The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982 01-10 City Council Packet(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA tE) CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If discussion is desired, that item w i l l be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Accounts Payable 2. Interfund Transfers 3. Hi l l.wood ' Dr. - Dort and Rd. r Retai nage 4. Inflow /Infiltration Analysis 5, T.H. 61 - Easement 6. Special Exception Renewal - Pizza Time Theater 70 First Time Home Buyers Program 8, Final Payment N. Hazelwood Park .90 1983 Fee Schedule - Park Facilities (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS. 1. Code Amendment -. Shoreland Ordinance (7:00) 2. Beam Ave. Reassessment (7:15) 30 Code Amendment: Special Use Permits (7:30)_ 4. Community Development Block Grant (7:45)_ 50 Rezoning &Variances: English Street (8:00) (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Frost Avenue: Birmingham - White Bear i NEW BUSINESS 10 Special Exception: 1904 Maryknol l 2. Time Extension - Beam Lakeside Addition (Piletich) 30 Council Appointments a. Acting Mayor b. Official Newspaper c. Planning Commission Chairperson d. Rules of Procedure 40 Travel and Training 59 P.A.C. - Commercial & Industrial 6, P.A. C. - Residential 70 Ramsey County League (J) VISITOR PRESENTATION • . .,....:_.. _.-. ....... . . ...... ._.. . .___-.. :. ..., ...... ...• .._ ..... ... .. .. ACC CITY 0� NAPLEW000 O U N T S P A Y A B !. E DATE 01-1083 PAGE . _ ' . CHECK A M 0 UN T . . 1 C L A I M A N T 1.P . . U R P O S E . :A-. r :.. . fir :::_ . - 1... .:.. 00 129 �' ::: :-.. : . ::..:.::.:.... ... . IftLYCENsE S PYA ... . ...... . . ':.: 36 3.5 0 :.............. ... ,.... .: I. HN T T E : T REA SURER : ` r ., .:. . . . ., .. . .. . . . ::01298 ,:. {:.. :.. .::'........ ,. :. :..: .::>:::.: :: x.3.0. �3 ' :. ._ . ... ::..:.:.. ... :::. . �. ::..Lt STAGE' REASURER :: ::::::: :..:...... .. . ... PATE Dl. FEES PiAD,` -4. = - 0 01299 -� 47, 720.54 C RAE I +SONS INC ANARDED CONST CONTRAC . . ____� �� . . S R S T R 'aL IN E E :.: I. _ _ . E R C FE E S S Y s 1 u pec s .......... � � i�'I* �i •�� . :. 0 a1301 � :.1€� . 71. .' . ......_ S TACEREASU RER-PERA - �----___ _ _ _--- _-_-_.:- . CE3NTRI f-� IONS* _ PARA 0 03302 3,947.6b _ RA hN STATE TREASURER PE P. E. R. A. QED PAYABLE N ANO CONTRIBUTI 0 S , PE _ . .. .. :. .. :: • . . .. . .. 0 0130 3 . ... .. :.::_:::. . . ; :.. . � q 522. I.O ; .....: _. :. :. . ..... . . A SERER-PERA .. HN S TATE TRE . . _ _ . #.E,R.A. BED PAYABLE' :. ANS-CONuios, 1. _ __ _ 001304 1560 00 MtINN STATE TREASURER STATE 0/L FEES PA YAB1 . - __�_ :: 30 5 - 003 --- --------- - ._I ... STAVE TEA'SURE :. . - . i. C E SE' EE I Y A . - . .. ... •. :fib. 0 .... :�� ' . - ::::....:: 00i30 :.:........ :.:...:.........:. -:..:::::.:.:::::: . :: -: --- _ .. ::.• i4, 00 :::• : .: .:... 1. I. . Bu13.ock N ARR Y+ K A R E N- _ ..: OT NER�ACQUISITION. CC` ------------ . . 0.01307 7,186.41 CONTROL COMM METRO WASTE CON S.A.C. PAY ABLE _ . .. . :: .. ..., 0 0130 .. . ;: .. ..a. :: :: .i6.� Q0 . .. . ... _ ..' A E! GT ASSOC .• . METRO R .. . TR Aft EL f TRA IN.Y NC .. . . ... . . .... . - . _ _ 00130 9 � - :... -- a. . __-5, _�_ __ Y -_ .=-= SR i+CE 4ici olle ba Basketball , V y NAPLELEAF OFFICIALS ASSN _ ___ 503.00' 04133D -- 47.00 � DIST RAMSEY CO CLERK 0 __. CNTr D!L FEES_ P�YAg .. 1 . . __�- _ . .. . :. ...I ... .. : ' :. . .:,a�- 003311:..:: :... .I..I-.... ... :: ':: .. . ....... ;:896.00 . .: ..:.: . . .. NINA 5 SAT E REQ SURR .:. . . :- S ' PAY I.A . :. N�f LICENSE FEE . . ..._ ....:.: :.:.: . . ....... . ... ..a.* .. . .. .-II .�............:,.:. ....-.._X::. _ 0 01312 .....I . ... .... .... .. :.. . __ -- MILAN STATE TREASURER --- --_ __..--- - - STATE 0/L FEES P Y B . 60.00 0 01 313 1 s D 00. fl4 EhPLO�f EE SENEFIT A �!S .. L I DPOSiTS _ NITH PAYING m . . . .:>:>:::::- ::... • 3 4 .., 01 1 •:.. : :::.::....<... ' ..: ,: ......: T46.7. :: :. :.. ... . .. . ... ::ON GENERAL FE N S $ QvS CONTRI i�T NSURA - �� 001315 - -- -- LIFE INS CO CONN GENERAL L . _ A!R I NS CONT i 1V U N C I UTiONS,It� AND-CONTR B — 528.40 ..::. ...: ....: 001316 :: ..:: 677. 9 . LAIN STATE: R A -SUR TAS... . .. .::..:. .. .SU HARGE 3' .. . �: :.,:. . - .. ...... ...:.:...:.. ;:...I , 10J317 :.: :. ::.:.. . = _ B O 0 K S i0.95 PALMER ENTER PRI SES ' 0 01318 i 0 D. 0D DINNER THEA TR CNAN #�ASSEN D i SUPPLIES, PROGRAM . . . 1 - . .. .: . .. . . 9 ........:.: 3 0 0 i .. :..... DINT ...:... `: i5. 5 :.: . TRA U R F A E E S T . . EN S EE S SAY LIC .:.: I. 1 . . w - - . r.. y-...w_••_-+-wT..-.w.." _-_•.s.--.+� rT-- :s a .t.� S w yi >i >..0 >F . r . 't h.. i '� 57 ,7, t .. w..�.�'.ti ...:,iY_. ... n• L<. I .iqW '.w. :�%E_7�..... ,.,a..�, ...`.x_ .....0 ,� ��'�tY':'-�f �-M ! :�'h��?SF.�.� .:�=�a•�F.�*'. '! r';.. •�„ l; � i5 _�.��. �.i ol, r, . } CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ACCOUNT S PAYABLE DATE 011M10-83 PAGE CHECK* A M 0 V N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 0 01320 220 00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE OCL FEES P YA 81 O Q1321 120 00• MINN 'STATE -TREASURER. STATE C FEES PAYA81 001322 883.50 MINN STATE TREASURER MV LICENSE FEES PAYAI 001323 400* 00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 0 01324 _ __-. -- _-- .120* fl�...� _MINN STATE . TREAS€1R ER_ ... _ _ LIC E _L _ONR___..-_. ENS ---.FEES P�-a 0 0132 5 58.00 MINN STATE TREASURER DNR LICENSE FEES PBL 00132£ 100.00 MINN STATE TREASURER FEES -9 SERVICE Registration . 001327 434.24 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP DEFERRED COMP PAYA LI. AND -DEFERRED COMPENSi 001328 15 9 792.49 _MAPS. EWOOO STATE BANK_ FED INCOME_ TAX PA YA B1 - 04329 7, 445* 63 :.. STATE OF MN :. _ STATE INCOME TAX PAYS NN STATE RETIREMENT SYST DEFERRED COMP PAYASLf 001330 200.00 0 01331 297.43 AFSC ME LOCAL 2725 - -- UNION DUES PAYABLE . : ..... _ ~AND -FA IR ...-SHARE FEES I 001332 .. 24.00 . METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC UNICN DUES PAYABLE.. 001333 277.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS CO DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 001334 119 523* 50 ."CITY f CT CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION BED+ PAYI 001335 14'5* 00 ROSEMARY KA NE :: WAGE DEDUCTIONS S PAYA E 001336 122.50 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK WAGE DEDUCTIONS PAYAE 001337 MN BENEFIT ASSOC - ��^ NS,.-PAYAsL .. 276.90 0 Q133 8 2s 135- 45 MINN STATE -TREASURER. MV LICENSE FEES PAYAE 001339 212.00 MINN STATE TREASURER. STATE O/L FEES PAYA8.1 001340 190.00 :: MINN.. STATE TREASURER _--..- TRAVEL TRAINING __-----0.0134 i__ 1 163.50. MINN STATE. TREASURER MV LICENSE , FEES PAYAE 001342 279,600 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE D/L FEES PA YABI 001343 4* 95 TIPS ON SLAYING SLOWPTC# BOOKS .. . . . _ CITY .'OF M�APLEWOOD ACC 0 U N T S PAY ABLE DAVE 01-1D-83 PAGE R CHECK` A M a D N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 001344 Y LICENSE FEES PAYAE .0 tAMSEY CO CLERK OF DIST O OI 34 836 5.0 MINN STATE T REA SURER _ ` Mir LICENSE FEES PLAY AE 001346 212. 00 MINN STATE TREASURER STATE DSL FEES PA YA 8L F Q.0�.34' lWARDEi3 CONST CONTRA( I4, 700. 57 ... DREEI - SONS . INC .. 5 f 136,9285 50 HECESSAR1f_EXPENDITURES _SINCE LAST _COUNCIL _MEETING -� e'r .��en� �sy!r'�.Ra►K""i"' •, .r .'Jo'r{x�Y'J.: y� o,--r•,4��a �t �"°i-�.,�r+.�'n�.'v�i'. -' rr-,•: n e�x. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ACC 6UN T S PAY ABLE DATE 0.3.-10-83 PAGE � CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I H A N T P U R P O S E D 15 23 8` 1.80 ADVANCE LIGHTING- TLG I . SUPPLI ES,'. EQUIPMENT 0 1.5 23 g. T.?. AMERICAN TOOL SUPPLY. f C0- .. SMALL �O�LS_ - -- - ------- -5240 309.41 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE t- REP. + . MAINT., VEHICL 01.5241 60.00. ARTSJOWING :.. :.. - REFS, SERVI E __ _ _ _ -_- ._ •Reserve Reimbursemen=, 015254 2,124.50 DELAHUNT # VOTO CO - 0 5 42 94.64 _ BATTERY_*. :TIRES. WHSEr INC SUPPLIES s VEHICLE_, Audit 0 25255 250.83, AND -CHEMICALS 015243 58. 28 r . GERALD BENDER ICE FEES.* SERVRe FEES !._. SERVICE V I C __.. _ -- --- serve Reimbursemeni 015244 22': ... ... DOARD OF WATER COMM . .... UTILITIES 015 245 67.51 BILI. BOYER FCBD SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 015 24 6 139.18 BRAD RAGE N INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE. _ 015247 4. 4 ::.. . :.....:... 13RON N PHO D _ : .. FEES, SERVICE ND MAINTENA.NCE MA EF - r riw im Processing 015248 14.17 BURKHARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES, OFFICE 015249 ...`:44.x.40.:. CALL.AHAN STEEL SUPPLY .......:......MAINTENANCE NATERIALf 015250 2..18. 'CAPITOL SUPPLY • CG_� MAINTENANCE MATERIAL" oi5251 50.00 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP UNIFORMS + CLOTHING �^ 0 15 25 2. :. CORM iG-D ONOHUE :. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL % 6.3*00, 815 25 3 :: - ..53.32. ` STEVEN• DALT FEES SERV IC£ _ _.._ _ -- - ------ __ _ _ _ -_- ._ •Reserve Reimbursemen=, 015254 2,124.50 DELAHUNT # VOTO CO EEES,9 SERVICE Audit 0 25255 250.83, Im .DIESEL. SERVICE =. RSP. MA INS'.,EiC 015256 224 44 . � RICH ARD £ ASTIUND FEES !._. SERVICE V I C __.. _ -- --- ------------ -- -- Reserve Reimbursemen 01525 7 6.00 DANIEL F FAUST TRAVEL f TRAINING I MA-INTENANC£ MATERIAL. V 0f525 8T: Qfl FEDERAL LUMBER CO 0 i5 25 S ' 262. �2 __. _ FUER ST' EROS INC. - EQUIPMENT* OTHER ----- -- -- -- ----- 015260 181.04 JAMES FULLER FEES, SERVICE Reserve Re_imbursemen- --- O 15 263. 48.43 GENERAL TRADING . SMALL TOOLS is �" �IyY,'�. ,y`"•.r � � .� _ .�� Y ;x; 4```^' o : '..cam, C t?,�a. �. +D �.T c. C _... ��' :,8^r..: �Rf.k �S•+A44c.?iZ-. :.�.. $7'�C'�;"Rzs'."!t�„w^,•�Ga"�y'.....X;*dYY`;,....:.....�.t4�"r'�"',Y, .�'Y�i.''�R'.!fR�*:�CItS"'j'wlF�r'�,p,'�,! f+a�!n!'e�.r+d�t.4r11�..+9f, :d�G,'»�.��"A .•1Aw:,r•.i�Ww :'lft -'�_M�'�+`^:�, !�. - .`'�.1:� :. .. - CITY OF MAPLEW000 CHECK* A M 0 U N T ACCOUNTS- PAY ABLE DATE 01-10-83. PAGE . C L A IM A NT P U R P O S E 015262x.6.55... ::: b. 00 GOOD IK C : t3PPLIES, EQUIPMENT .. 0152b3: 32.58 B F GOODRICH CO SULIES-HIC_LE 64 37x.40 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORE REP. f PAINT., VEHICL 015 2 035255 ::: b. 00 GRUSERS HARDWARE :. HANK REP. # PAIN .VEMICI , 015266 161.20 MILLIAM JONES FEES, SERVICE -- - Reserve- Reimbursement 015267 164.02 KNOX LUMBER COMPANY SMALL TCOLS AND -MAINTENANCE MATEF" 01526 8 ;.: :.. ... 32.50 RICHARD J LANA :SUPPLIES, PROGRAM . 015269 219.48 MARIANLU $ A - -- - ---F E ES 9 SERVICE___._ Reserve Reimbursemen 015270 137.54 MELV IN MACFARLANE JR FEES,- SERVICE_ "•:. . iu men T . 01521 14.00' NAPLEWLOD REVIEW SUBSCRIPTIONS+MEMBER � MICHAEL J MAZZITELLO REP* + MAINT.,- RADIO ----_- 015 27 2 130.00 VOID r��.-5.2' -&�h S- _ r% Ill J* �S*r 5--1�I-t' . 015 27 4 .32e58 DANIEL ME TT LER SUPPLIES,. PROGRAM 015275 MIKE aSLP_ GAS SERVICE rHEATING - OIL -Y---- ---- 12.48 C 15276 1,_501.54 MINN MINING } MFG _CO - SIGNS _ }_SIGNALS _ 0152,9,o49 77' 2 364.49. , STATE CF HN ::.• :. EQUIPMENT, OTHER. 0-1527 8 1,408.20 _ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW FEES, SERVICE Data Processing 015 27 9 157.48 GEORGE MULWEE FEES, _SERVICE_ Res*erve Reimbursemen 015280 .11t 029. 00 HUNIC f PRIVATE SERVICE 4 -FEES, SERVICE Animal -`Control 015 281 300.00 NAROINI FIRE EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT, OTHER NATIO-NAL BUSINESS SYSTEM FEES; SERVICE 0 i5 28 2 40*20 . Microfiche Processin 0 1528 3 : :" X77. 98 :.: NORTHERN STATES. POWER CO UTILITIES 015284 20, 010. EO NORTHWESTERN SELL TEL CO TELEPHONE 015285 273,. T9 NORTHWESTERN BELL TEL, CO TELEPHONE - ."'•. - .r. '!-?�7R'=r•$Y'i�T; T{A'F.v�'^.:61�i pC,t•rc.9!1�r?�7`•7„-n►.�,:?..,;..t'7!�:"'�Z+'T�a�p�„q}'�'a :i.,;y{�yr,: ^; w-.S�T�i. "�',•:`.•'�1"�"L'i"� c�., �...:..r�v '-;y .. .. •+;a µ#; '. _:�"^'w �•.hF c_ •t�,�.t �tr+t.� - .. •4' ..y. ,y -f ..:, .:S.P". "�..�: c��. .. � .. _.: �'� V .-�'^.•,�.,.. - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK* A M 0 U N T ACC OUN.T S PAY ABLE C L A I M A N T DATE P U R P 0 S E PAGE 4 0 1528L6 ::9 . 24 OMARN 'OL SON J FECES', SERVICE esery R imb .... .....e e ursement 01528 ` 81.75 0SWAL9 FIRE --HOSE wlANTE,NANC AT iA „c 015288 536.25 RAMALEY PRINTING SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 015 28 9 15.bi RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER OUTSIDE ENGINEERING f 015 Z90 - 7.3 _ ROSEVILLtAREA _SCHOOLS � _E�EESi: SERVICE Election 015 291 54.60 ' RYCO SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL 015292 65.63 : -:SMI TESTING : :: :...: OUTSIDE ENGiNEERI NG. I 01529 370.71: S + T OFFICE PRODUC _� �SUPP#.IES,__OFF CE 015.294 68.20 WILLIAM! SCHMIDT FEES, SERVICE •:. __Re.s.erV.e.. _Re.imbur.s er�ent 015295. 158. 1 :" SEARS ROEBUCK CO :. :.. :. UHIFOR lS CLOTHING 01529b : 78* 82. _ - _ _NCE : C C _SHARROi�__C4^_INC...+ _ MAT ERI ALS ------------..-...tAI N'ENA_-----__ . - _ 161.20 GARY V ANNEL LI 015 297 .5 3.18 CHRISTINE SO UTTER SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL Reserve Reimbursemen 015308 75.50 AND -BOOKS .. 015309 : 34.9b Aht3-T V L �� R } TR N 015 29 8 6 0 0 ... CHRISTINE SO UTTER�� ::..:...:: :.::..:... ._ ... _ _ POSTAGE 015299 20.45 - ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC SUPPLIES, OFFICE WILLIAN STEARNSr . : FEES SERVICE 015300 2fl5.84 :.. . e m urse R i b mer. 01530. �` ._:244.71 TARGET_ STORES_..IN .eserve S P LIES,._ -PROGRAM 015302 370.00 TEXGAS CORP- .. _-HEATING OIL -_5303 01UC _ ::.155.00 iR UTILITIES FFG CO REPO + MAINT., YEHIC TURN QU 1ST PAPER C© SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL. D 15 30 4 164.20 015 30 5 469.96 DONALD TWEDT JR FE.ES,SERVICE ___ , •:. '.Reserve Reimbursemen D 0 30 b :. 37.5Q . ::. ;TWIN CITY FILTER SERV IN. :: FEESt. SERVICE 00307 161.20 GARY V ANNEL LI FE ES, SERVICE Reserve Reimbursemen 015308 75.50 VIRTUE PRINTING CO SUPPLIES, OFFICE_ 015309 : 34.9b ::: WARNERS TRUEVALLIE HOW SUP ' LIES , JANITORIAL !I vM l..t l r: �vyt`� A•n.,'�.�T'*/a-�, ^1T+Wl-:s-..'S4_w �• ,;Ay l,'(?. Tib.. e ., ... .. ,. '� - fce.f.S7;�?'4�oR�11�'nA�V�1R^"7E�sv"1�r'�+^4'.4�4T�c•`e�"''ue'Q'.'...��4,"�:.�'�fM'rs�':"!�!�!'rf"-"4f.i"a�'°�+rivti'!wv�►:xsr>:.l:s.}es'S'p*".....cr:-r��xY!qs:-.,w•;tS,�Pc�'.">^!xM!la.?c�il�.�Sy:-:' •'°`. bay• ,.�. �•... �. CITY QF l tPLEMtO D A C G U N T. $ P A ..Y A 6 HATE 01 -1a -g3 PAGE C HE CKA H O U N T C L A I H A N T P U R P 0 S E 015 310 19.50.. WEBER } .TRCS ETH INC FEES, SERVICE-Rechar Fire Extinguishers s ers 015311 5. 0__ _Z E�`-- MFG GO .. �:. SUPPLIES.s.._JANITORIAL 015312 ' 21.70 PARI LYN JOYCE G ALBRA.ITH MAGES, P/T f TEMP. MARY ANN ARTS. 0 015313 T 5.25 R E�f F. U _-N 01531 4- -- --- --- :. 23.50 CONN Y _ SLA IR R E- F U- N ---D 015315 15. 75 MRS DONALD BRIER R E F U N* 0 Y�~ 01531E BUCKS. UNPAINTED FURN SUPPLIES! EPMENT 149.95 ^ 015 31 7 8.25 MADE LYN OUFO UR = R E F U. N 0 015318 10. 50 ROBERT DAHNS R E E U N D t�i5319� -_. KATHY EL-KANDEL�Y---. E _F; --U_ N _0 .. . 10.50' :..�� . R- 81532 '� 3.0 0 ^ FU R S T R E. F _- -- 0 _�MARSHA 015321 5.25 LINDA F IR C H R E F U N 3 015 32.2 ;SHIRLEY GQSS ELI N� - � �R E- F� Ur N ._0 �. 25 � �..� 015 323 ` :. le 75 NAUGE GOULDI NG R E F U N 0 015324 18000 ROBYN HELTNE R E F U N 0 015325-_�____ RAE ANN�HILLEREN '� ... —t.-. -F. U -N: 0.____ - .. R E � 8.25 015326 9.* 00 LELIA HATCHER `. :.:: :. R E F U N 0 015327 3.00 DENISE JEWELL R E F U N 0 015 32 -- E F U N 9. Q0#RS NN #lO LL R 0 _ 015329 �`R 3.00 ER I N HOHS .......> .....: E F U N 0 015 33 0 5.25 PATRICIA HCC L ELL A N R E F U N 0 015331 3.75 PEGG Y MCCA RTHY R F U�N C 015;132 'A`. 00 :: ELIZABETH OFSTE1 R E F. U N D 0153-33 3. 00 JULIE RASNUSSEN R E F U N 0 015334 3.25 MRS SAUVA GEAR R E F U N D �. .-�.: •r��7�.��i!.t;• .�''. ..,+.sem. Yf,,s '#' h `!'� +t-;. .. •.,, , ._ •�r--� .��f7�?Yl r�"�• h,, .i1. Ni j:. ":1&�' .r _�r.. - '�"�"a' �. :�":'.'M.: :�"q. -.. y.. .,�..�. :y' _ ,1 r,. .y.t. .l..sw...• .r.^r: r .�-� --..� . . "`.'�"'.r�.^*,r,,:---A-rac..-'-, ^- - y. ,.< e.- R- r�+r_ : r:� • ,►.�, .. .,i, a . .. .. � _ ..._. � _ .<. rt _ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ACCOUNTS -PAYABLE. DATE 01-10-83 PAGE CHECK* A M 0 U N T C L A I N A N T P U R P 0 S E 01533.540 -: 8'S 5b.. :: QRS ELISSA SNANSON: R : PATRICIA A ALLEY N0 _ .... 6 :::..::: ..:...... . MRS.: JAMES SCHUI. TE _ --- --- _--_-_ 151.28 E FU FEES, SERVICE N: 0 01533 7 3.75 MRS STEOMA N R E F U N D 01533 . �+ 00 CYNTHIA SGHUMACHER R N D15.33�3. ' 7 LANA TOBIAS R E. F U� N .0. 015340 '� 5.25 KATHRYN TVEOT R E F U N D 0 i5 341 14* 20.. ...: :-: TARGET SUPPLIES, PROGRAM Y BRANCH �iATERSHED DST f EES SERVICE. 015342 _ 26 8.3 VL - _ _ + _ :. Assessments 015343* 5.50 BARBARA HASELHA N R E F U N 0 015344 -: 8'S 5b.. :: : OR LLE K ANDERSCN FEES f SERVICE. _:... :.. Reserve Reimbursemen 5.345 1,38. 88 :: PATRICIA A ALLEY F E E _. SERVICE Ss 'Re _ - w_----___ - eserve mbursemen 015346 151.28 LARRY R J ACOSSK I FEES, SERVICE Reserve Reimbursemer 015 347 :.-. 10.6o 64 ... . ....... ... ... BATH Y` J KNUTSON... :: FEES, SERI�LCE .. ....:::. R i b u mer 0 35 34 8 2 5 Vii. 6 8. - Jt SE P H MORIN R I �t E� E S f SERVICE .----_- --- - -- �� --A s e rve Re imbur s emer C15349 10.00 NORTH AMERICAN BLUEBIRD SUBSCRIPTIONS+MEMBER CHECK REGISTER: --�I 9.9913 CITY OF MA PLE YO OD TEM DE S # R IP TI ON K Np. pATE^ - AMOUNT VENDOR - _ - -CAEC ......._.._ solo_ MN WASTEWATER OPP AS DUES 2 i 011564 12/30/82 5.oa 3, 4� b 45.3 j pUMIC• FINANCE OFFIC SU BSGRIPTIOff of l 5s.a 1 930 /82 e igs 110 1 {J t t ' 1b0.�.0.:PROF..EN6I-- '?______ 011 b14-. — 12/•30 /82 -- - — . _ 3.60 *Do l 14 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MEMS: RSHIP "' . �.s 011618 12130 f82 45.I0� 45•� 0 — 1'9 �2t - 35.12 NO STAR CHAPTER IC MEMBERSHIP =Z: 23 411638 3,2130182 _ 35.10 * _ i« COMPUTIN6.___MrbersPERSONRL- 'hip 011693 1.230 /82 12x1 - '3. TWIN CITIES MUSICIAN SR/ADULT DANCE 32' 011923 12/30/82 133• • �34' ' != 12/30/92 1 -- — UNIvERSITT OF MINNES TRAVEL TRAINING �3;1 _ 011939 180.11.. ! 1 ��. r 4•--.. - C ._SAFE_ - Y- MEMBERSHIP--- :•,!!!: .a2 ... 1110 bl /3!? /82_ASSN--`PUBLi _ 1.. ...---•- 143 1 44 , .4t"CITY 10 .? D. ENS ASSN OF MN MEMBERSHIP ' 471 111154 12 / 30 /82 to .3.0. 149 s 10 oo�,��, EAST COMIMUNI TIES FAR CONTR iaUTi ON =2 111220 12 / 30 /82 � 10.000 •IO• _ *53 ` � •s,)___-il 11.98" EC-QNQ_M_I.� PRESS RSMIp - (s.-L- u.:252/30./3 - _ .. 4 ,_____ 111535 1-3-7 3.' t " G : !! t* * t* 12/30/82 _ 10.02. NN _M_F0 A MEMBERSHIP 10.7 A.. 111551 12/30/82 1983 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD !4Z 111551 12/30 /82 !42 12f30182 1 CHECK REGISTER L ±4= 140.1 A 1451 !*.>*>*• _ __ - ---_-- CHECK NO* DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DES: RIP TI OR 5.70. FUND 90 TOTAL 48 _ TOTAL 49j 11 9 489.9 S { -s0) 31� 52 93� 3r 111302 12130 /82 170.3) NENNEPI N COUNTT CMIE -.—TRAVEL i _TRA IN IW 170.78. C 8, - iol ( 111 111350 12130/82 329.70 - INTL CITY MGMT ASSOC MEMBERSHIP 12 32 9.7 0 _ * .6 111452 12130/82 14032 MAPLE WOOD REVIEY SUBSCRIPTION � 117! t ei !21 } 1114.6_6 12/30/82 S.nB. _METRO _ AREA_!!6T_AS$OC _. HE HOE RSH IP _ i22 t 23, 24. 26- 111469 , 12/30/82 100.32._ METRO LOSERS GROUP MEMBERSHIP 27, 100.75. j2Er j31 111524 12 30 /82 60030 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE MEMBERSHIP .32 i 60.1.0.. 33i _ ,_____ 111535 1-3-7 3.' t " G : !! t* * t* 12/30/82 _ 10.02. NN _M_F0 A MEMBERSHIP 10.7 A.. 111551 12/30/82 70.70. MN REC + PARKS ASSOC MEMBERSHIP !4Z 111551 12/30 /82 !42 12f30182 1 ,TO.O� _ _MH RE C _+ PARKS _ASSOC _ MEMBERSHIP— ±4= 140.1 A 1451 !*.>*>*• _ __ - ---_-- �46,-- - �47 i 1 484.9 5 FUN 0 01 TOTAL 5.70. FUND 90 TOTAL 48 _ TOTAL 49j 11 9 489.9 S { -s0) 31� 52 93� 3r CITY OF HAPLEW-COD PAYROLL REFORT V A li 145* 56 145o56 06143 REGISTER CHECK DATE 12-30-82CERTIFICATION CHECK 19i. 54 145*44 06144 GROSS PAY MET PAY fl 6i ANDERSON NCRMA N G ZUERCHER 181095 06135 71 BASTIAN GARY w .__..________ 275eOD 296o57 06136 GREAVU_ _ _. ----_ __ ----- _ _ JOHN c -- _ _ _ .-. __. 350*00 254*61 0 6137 JUXER FRANCES L 275*00 230*20 06138 NA IDA HARYLEE T 2T 5.00 239*04 0 6139 _.B E LOIS N 6111*46 426o6i 061,40 EVA . N S BARRY R to 8 17o .5 4 i, 237.89 06141, PELOQUIN ALFRED 06152 747023 505*84 061"42 SCHLEICHER JOHN 145* 56 145o56 06143 CUDE LARRY 19i. 54 145*44 06144 DOHERTY. KA T - H . L EEN N 319o77 227*33 06145 ZUERCHER JOHN L 115s39 115 3____ 06146 FAUST DANIEL F it 44 6.46 1,9069o86 06147 H . A . GEN ARLINE 8 88 0 9 2 611*06 06148 MATHEYS ALANA K ------- 677e54 06149 MOELLER MARGARET A 192000 17 3.12 0 6 . i . 50 V - IGCREN DECOKES A 586*.62 402008 06151 AURELIUS LUCILLE...._____ 1-9 358e46 862e35 06152 SELVOG 13ETTY 0 71te 23 464eC6 06153 GREEN PHYLLIS c 06154 SCHADT -__ JEANNE .._ _�_� �-.__ 215 *36 1 78e28 06155 VI,ETOR LORRA INE s 561069 .386o44 .. 06156 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 238*80 182e02 0615? KELSEY C N N I E L 67932 67*32 06158 FREDERICKSON RITA 123*00 123*00 1Tr U A'Ltw UUVATKULL '._.. KtrUK 1 to Ab c CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 12-30-81 CHECK _ - AHF_ G SS._PAY y .-NE-T.-PAX ..._ _ 06159 STOTTLEMYER EDITH G. 201.00 - 194:72 06160 BASTYR OE60RAH A 553.39 381.37._.. 0 5161 _ _-COLL I NS.. -.._------KEN NE TH Y _... �.: � O 4.52 -.- _9.63.•.4.4_1_.M_ 06162 HAOEN THOMAS L i, 42,4. 31 809.25 06163 ONATH JOY E 553.39 381.37 __..�.____-_0 616 ► RICHI E..._. CAROL-_ �•• _... . __5Q l..23. 349.48 06165 SVENDSEN JOANNE M 677.54 446.47 06166 ARNOLD DAVID L 119 182.92 790.73 06167 A TCHIS ON JOHN .H to 03 6.15 721.87 06168 BOWMAN RICK A - 828.90 590.32 _ -- 06169 CAHANES ANTHONY G It 216.15 800.50 06170 CLAUSON _ DALE K_ x1.9.036.1 __. 721.87 06171 D REGER RICHARD C 1, 23 4.73 8 30.64 06172 GREEN NORMAN L It 207.38 851.32 06LY3 HALWEG KEVIN R lv 075.39 743.42 06174 HEINZ STEPHEN J 871.38 561.06 06175 HERBERT MICHAEL i is 016.77 720.01 - _ - 0.6176 -_ - J A C U i T t� �__ .___ ._._ �. A N I E 1. w_ _ w_�... R _ ____ 1• ba..._ __- ___ _ _ . 5 7 i • ... _.__.__ -_.- ___ 06177 KORTUS DONALD V 101.68 89.87 06178 LANG RICHARD J 1, 05 6.00 720.97 61.79.-.. MCNULTY .W.19 20..§* 9_2-____-__06180 MEEHAN,JR JAMES E It 034* 78 611.05 -0.6181..___M•E T T L E R _DANIEL~ �----- _$_-1 4 9 8. g5 T 2 b. b T 06182 MOESCHTER RICHA RD H i 045.37 06183 MORELLI RAYMOND J 1, 016.77 730.80 •. ^'.n li'.; .:'T , .. yy,..r !.. . ... :.m.Y _. "ws..'w-[..r4w,. 4. "+c .reMt...+t .•',�.w..... :r. r.., •x. -.•i: _"'y ""t: 'tiw .M: .: TJ:rP :.; .%''bI?R _'....r. ...cr `y..yb-• ..y...-...++•-.•...yc.p._ w. .-a-. ,.+.sirtge. .+•<.1: li. isA`... .".Sy . .._q•A.. +►_... . _•. ;. -nr.. -• :.I ra •: i!':'nl" : '.T"•-. .,t_.1. ._+.n.. t 41TY OF MAPPAYROLL' IMPORT PAGE 3 --- CERT IFICAT ION REGISTER CHECK OATS 12.30_$2 _ - CH EC K NAME E . _.. OSS $AY NET PAY 06184 PELT IER WILLIAM. F 1,15 3.08 772.85 . - 06185 SKALMANDONALD 68 7.63 W i� 816.77 STAFNE GRE G Q R y -_- _ i, 0 3 i. OT _ _. 749* 8 2 _ 06187 sTFFFEN sco TT- _ 791012 . .. �. 613.14 06188 STILL VERNON T 997.38 588.76 0-b139 .__ .. STOCKTON _ ---------- OA RRE L! . _ ... __.. T is 816.0 8 699e.0,4 05190 _ ZAPPA JOSEPH! A 1, 208.77 T ia.40 .06191 _ 8 E C KE R RONALD 7 .31029 G R A F --- Q A Y I l] __ . _- ..-____ ----M-___------- _1...07 0.0 061 93 LEE . � . i�aG ER � t,104.DO 782.73 061 94 __ ... M E L A N D E R --- --- - J O N -- A __ :.:. _ __ 1, 065.23 ____._ - - -_. 702.46 _--D 61.95 NELSON - _ �.CAR01___---_ M 1 le 7 -2-0 _3 _ 9 3.4 8 .061.96 RAISKAIflFF MAZE E 19t28.32 685.44 0 f�197 . RYAN -- NIC Ct�A EL.. P ____--- -.- --- - 731.2 . 9 - i, 07 4. Tb _.. bi 98 vORWERK ROBERT E 8 84o..61 736070 0 619 YoUNGREN JAMEs. � , 1,06.54 . 655.78 0.6200 _ E M 8 E R TS 0 N .._.... __ _.__. __---J A M E S � �____----._ __._--_ H ---�-_.____`._-..____. -- _:__. i, a15. i3 .... - • __-.------ • 686.72 05201 - SCHADT _ A!F'RED _... . _. _ C i 12 7 *_5r4_ . _._ 76.0.30 06202 FLAUGHER JAYME L. 677.54 446.47 06203 . FULLER JAMES--- 4 7 t*48 647.92 -.-.------06204 _ _N A R T I N ------- _ S NA wR _ ._. _.. _ .. 6 8 2.5 5� 4 5 5.0 2 : . 0"62 05 NELSON KAREN A 545.23 428.46 . 06206 NElSO_N R O _ • 8 ?8. _6 _8 Z, 287* 24 � 06207 _ --RAA INE____ JANET ___.._. __.w 62 3.OZ 416008 0 62 08 WILLIAMS DUANE •� 19 05 5. 54 6 51.3 8 .�1� ~ - +- - - :.£,. .. v V ,� r 1177 - .... _ ._+.� :'"4�'tjfy7eP7�%'�•.5� ,,.T'`i:�R.x11/9!:!G�4r�71�2�..a.*a�aetCMnr�r.w�wnwe�.._._. CITY OF-MAPLEWOCO , PAYROLL REPORT R i` PAGE _ -CHECK 05209 - 0 6210 �_923.24 BARTA HA IpER CERTIFICATION MA R IE L KENNETH G REGISTER ER . _-ORO SS._. PAY _ _ 484.89 .19391008 CHECK DATE 1 2 3D 8r N E -T PAY 3 _ 0 6212 :NEGwERTH -- S WILLIA14 C 0. b2 --_ i• 157.08 352,009 714 .74 5213 F R-EBER6RONALO885480 --- _ 6-a-4 .i 9 � b2 i4 1�ELE Y ,.. _RONALD 8 8.5. $ 5 8 2 . b 0 06215 - _ ..... _ ... _. HflC H 8A N JOSEPH N 885.80 _ 514.98 -06216 - KAN�MICHAEL .. NI CHA EL R ..---.---.._ 548.63 06217 _ _ .KLAUSING _._----_ 887. $4 06218 MEYER GERALD M 921. T4 . 613 .10 6219 _'__ PRETTNER _ Jt� SEP H_i 2.5. s 1.20 -- .860.50.- 6220 _.._.._ REINERT _.._...DiARD__.:132.___ 00 4. - - 548*63.os221 TEvL��,JR . _ - MARRY . J $Z9.04 551.44 - 06222 ELIAS .DAMES G GEISS LER._ . TE R m 0.6224 GESSELE -JAMES T 935008 6 29.21 0 62 25 PECK 10 674.67 _..0b226 P.ILLATZKE-... .____. DA _ Vii. 157.08 _ 8 0 9.. 6 9 . 0 62 27 PR I ES E WILLIAM - - 973.42- - 579.16 06226 LUTZ DAVID p- �44.55 8 RE HE I M _ ROGER _.... _ _. N 5 18.3 3 08230 EDSON DAV IO D 842. T2 580.57 ._---MULWEE 06231 - _--.- C EO RG.E W 517.33 b2_32 __... NADEA iiARD _._ A 850.88 596098 06233 - NUTESON - LAVERNE 19088000 663.7 - -.. ,•,,.��`R.' .��7'. _•. .,�. �..~:. .r .'s.1:..��•.��"��gw._'1-S.'.�.t. ,'�11M'n!MJ�►+T.e °;� �.. ` ..'Sy:'.'llbdff•'4'51,2'??.Y'�•'!•r+�•+.V� tt"Y.^�`2�'!Ns'�_,'4�!?►r a.nar.-tf..rR^vas�m'w�. qw - ... .. ..... ti.-+ �"'sew^'+yw•qMi•3.+,�u:+�i+:asv.t.Iyk+14a4i:.::..J:y�Cc..•"-.'•-n+..•w++rn.�w!iy.Rs�,gnp••.nnstr•�r�y�,�. Al KO LL.- � � 5 - CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE E 12-30.82 _. _..._. CHECK NAM_. -GROSS PAY NET PAY 08234 OMEN GERALD C 840.00 . 589.86 06235 M A C D 0 h A L p JOHN QHN 908.80 50 7.51 06236 _--MULVANEY - . _.._.�.__. DENNIS _ .. �! 87 6.4 0 6 21.72 06237 BRENNER LOIS T15465 488.24 0-6238 .._ ....K R U IM ME L . S A R 8 A RA .. _ . --� _ _.�. _--------�-_._____..._.: 270.40 201.98 RO B E R Y0 -- 9 6 4.54 --------------- - 0 62 40 STAPLES - PAULI NE M 1,05602 689.95 ALAN 306.000b241 254e5? 54.5T -_-----_____06242 -_ BURKE MYLES .._ _..._ _ _. _ 6o.5 Q - O 6243 GERHA IN DAVID A824000 - 559.50 062 44 _ ..& US i N QA MEL VI.N.. 19, 2b i. 4 0 710e04 -------- -0,b245 MA TTH Ew . - 383000 0 _. _ -_- - - _ 3 8 3.0 -�- 06246 HELEY ROLAND a. 824.00 548.53 06247 HUNTER UNTERvTONY ` _.._ 100.80 99.78 - .---06248...- LIBHAROiTHOMAS _ D 118. _ 28 i_i 4.91.._.._. 05249 MARUSXA MARK A47 9 .60 637.08 .06250 ._�._.R A S C H f {E ALBERT - f T5.50 68.31 THO HA SJ 3b 1. 25 3 2 9.8 0 - 06252 SANTa . REED � 953.04 .. 57 8.81 06253 BUNKE RICHARD H 238.50 210.91- 06254 CERNIUS ----- AID _._._ C 154. 00 154.00 06255 G ALBRA ITS# MICHAEL 08 i 0.00 163.13 06256 tlERBER� � SCAR IM 145.55- 145.5,5 . 8 6257KORTUS - _-.M- - -- __-.. JAMES _ _ _ m _._ 134. 08 127.96 0 62 58 RASCHKE JEFFE RY58 J 2 .83 - 25 8.83 .. - -.. ,•,,.��`R.' .��7'. _•. .,�. �..~:. .r .'s.1:..��•.��"��gw._'1-S.'.�.t. ,'�11M'n!MJ�►+T.e °;� �.. ` ..'Sy:'.'llbdff•'4'51,2'??.Y'�•'!•r+�•+.V� tt"Y.^�`2�'!Ns'�_,'4�!?►r a.nar.-tf..rR^vas�m'w�. qw - ... .. ..... ti.-+ �"'sew^'+yw•qMi•3.+,�u:+�i+:asv.t.Iyk+14a4i:.::..J:y�Cc..•"-.'•-n+..•w++rn.�w!iy.Rs�,gnp••.nnstr•�r�y�,�. CITY OF _.MAPLEWOCO � TPAYROLL REPORT � PAGE 6 CERTIFICATION REGISTER CHECK DATE 12-30-82 CH EC K NAME G RO S S P A T_ RE T . _ P.A.-T,_06259 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS i 804.00 539.23 0 60 T O N N L E Y ---M I C HA E 1......_ .... _ F. 2 O 5, 4 4 2 0 5.4 0 0 62 61 K A LL A C E _ _ JON - ----__ _ _ -- . T ---- - ---- - �_a a a 6_- 86088 � -- 06262 WARD ROY G .328.62 253.25 06263 GREW .JANET M 684.92 448.59 0 62 64 S 0 U T T ER_ ----- _ _ ._. CHRISTINE.-------... :b84.9� __- - _---- _... 7fl. fly- 06265 CHLEBECK JUDY it 7 ii.23 476.63 _ t 62 bb OLSON - - GEOFFREY N 1s 340.31 912.8 0 06267 E K S T R A ND ' T H O MA S G 84.5.* 0 0_- 0 62 68 JOHNSON RANDA LL . . L 844.46 561.14 06269 OSTROM MARJORIE 1,9133o54 716o3O 0 62 70 WENGER ROBERT J 857o54 �_-49 2.03.. CHECK REGISTER TOTALS 10 69 965.77 72„ 979.57 1 MEMORANDUM RAJ TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director �~ RE: Interfund Transfers for Unassessed UtilityImprovements p rovemen is DATE: January 3, 1983 Transfers are made annually from the dater Availability Charqe Fund, Hydrant Charge Fund, and the Sewer Fund to the Snecial Assessment Fund to amortize the cost of unassessed water and sewer improvements over the term of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. (The attached Table 12 from the 1981 Annual Financial Report provides a schedule of these transfers.) When the tax levy for this year was adopted, reductions were made in the debt service tax levies for the anticipated transfers scheduled for 1982. Therefore, the following transfers (to be effective 12-31-82) are recommended: FROM TO Special Assessment Fund: $ 859312 W.A.C. Fund 1973 Bonds (#513) 719700 Hydrant Fund 1977 Bonds (#520) 69010 Hydrant Fund 1979 Bonds (#522) 29050 -$-1659072 Sewer Fund 1979 Bonds (#522) Total V9. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA DEBT -SERVICE TAX LEVIES - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS Last .Ten Years Through Maturity (UNAUDITED) Year. Scheduled Taxes Levy Per ]Payable Bond Register 1.972 $229,000 1973 283,600 1974 305, 700 .1975 376r600 1976 427,300 1977 4 95, 70 0 1978 639; 300 1979 666,400 1980 783j800 1981 793j400 1982 799, 300 1983 800#864 1984 8020400 1985 81.5, 600 1986 816,500 1987 8176100. 1988 818j700 1989 8148900 1990 806,800 1991 800,400 1992 813,400 1993 762,500 1994 62 0, 312 1995 239,300 1996 2 38, 2 00 1997 248,600 1998 1968500 1999 648000 Less Anticipated Interfund Transfers In* From W.A.C. From Hydrant From Sewer Fund Charge Fund Fund $ 52r031 62j625 67,875 72j750 72o469 82,100 81r281 85e312 89r062 91, 875 100,500 98,062 105,562 107,625 109,312 110e719 116, 812 122,250 127,219 - - $77r710 77,710 77,710 77,710 77,710 77e710 77, 710 77r710 77,710 77,710 77,710 77r710 77,710 77r710 77,710 6j010 6r010 6e010 6,010 6,010 - $2,050 21050 2j050 2, 050 2, 0 50 2, 0 50 2, 050 2, 050 2r050 2v050 2e050 2s050 2j050 2j050 2,05 . 0 2, 05 2, 0 50 2, 0 50 2r050 2,050 Net Tax Levy Anticipated $229, 000 283,600 305,700 324j569 364s.675 427, 825 566,550 593,931 621, 940 632,359 634,228 632j042 630,765 635,340 638,678 631-1778 631,315 625,828 616j321 603,828 611v390 555,521 540,552 231.e240 2308140 240,540 188e440 55,940 Table 12 Actual Tax Lew.*. $229,000 223,600 225, 000 247,250 293e800 378, 900 527e850 526t430 530, 000 521#400 514,400 * Transfers are made annually from the Water Availability ability Charge (W•A.C•) Fund, Hydrant Charge Fund, and Sewer Fund to the Special Assessor • P Assessment Fund to amortize the cost of unassessed water and sewer improvements over P the term of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. ** Actual tax levies are less than anticipated f • scheduled le er the P or two reasons. First, the levy p bond register is based upon estimated special assessment levies which often exceed estimates. Second inter special assessments and the investme • est on nt of monies from prepaid assessments exceed the rate of interest on the bonds. TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: December 22, 1982 SUBJECT: Hillwood Drive--Dorland Road Project No. 78-10 E IW3 Act- ion b7 Endc- 1 lid CIA I 1. rr 1 The project is approximately 90 percent completed. The work remaining to be completed in 1983.consists of constructing the final lift (1-1/2 inches) of street surfacing and a portion of the restoration (topsoil and seeding) around the storm water detention ponds. The contractor was instructed to phase this work in an attempt to provide a more cost efficient project and better finished product. The work completed has been approved by City inspectors and are currently in use. We have kept, during the course of the project, a value equal to five percent of the completed work as retainage,,as required by State law. Since the project is substantially completed and being used by the City we are recommending that the City Council authorize the retainage to be reduced to two percent of the amount constructed to date. This reduction in retainage will result in the City retaining $12,334.1.8 on the work completed to date and an estimated $43,000..00 for the work remaining. The City also has as surety a Performance and Payment Bond equal to 100 percent of the construction cost. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT ON CONTRACT Date Estimate No. ____Z For period froml0-2 3-82 to12- - P�- - 9 82 78-10 City Project No's,, Bid No's. _j Name and Nature of Project Hillwood Drive/Dorland Road Im . Proj No. 78-10 $ Completed After This Estimate 88,7 $ ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT .............................. $ 6 7 7, 84 0. 2 5 CHANGE ORDERS: No,, Date Approve A *iti.ons Deduction 1 8-23-82 5171143.65 TOTALADDITIONS..0606 ............................$ T7 SU B TOTAL . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ TOTAL DEDUCTIONS .................................$ CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE ...............................$ , . .TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE.000000........................$ 6165708.86 MATERIALSSTORED.... .............................$ TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED ............................$ 616 708.86 -LESS RETAINAGE 2 $...........................$ 12,334.18 TOTAL EARNED LESS FLETAINAGE ...........................$ 6045374.68 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS ...........................$ 570,707.08 Est, No., 1 Amt118,296.96 Est. No. Amt Est. No. 2 'Amt18i5866957yst. No. Amt .Est, No. 3Amt , Est. No. Amt Est. No. _ 4 Amt8 5 • TEst. No. Amt Est. No. Est • No. Amt _Amt Est. No. b Amt , Est. , No. Amt Est, No. Amt Est,, No. Amt Total Estimates 570-,-707.08 AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE.......•..•....•....•.........$ 33,667.60 Payment requested this day of Approved and recommended for payment r ,19 --2-2 this 17th day of _December 19 82 M„ol 3 l i n e P r, Contractor BY: Approved by City Council this d ay of L , 19 By: City Clerk SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. Project Engineer 9 r By.• Gee. R. Scott Harri APPROVED: City MEMORANDUM b kctian TO: City Manager End oL:� :'yi (moi �+. •. t 1 :' ..L,......,.e ��-n-...,e,,........ FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Infiltration/Inflow Analys-i s�� DATE: January 3, 1983.t��,�_,.T� t Attached is a .copy of the Final Infi l tra.tion/Inflow Analysis for Maplewood. This report was prepared using EPA, MPCA and local funding. The report provides information useful in determining future maintenance projects and schedules. It should be noted that the report findings do not mandate expenditures on the City's part. It is recommended the City Council accept the report and authorize its submission to EPA and MPCA for final review. mb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Action by C� FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE:Januar y 3, 1983 SUBJECT: T. H. 61 Frontage Road_.._ - Easement Acquisition _ ...�. .J Project No, 80-10 We proceeding with acquisition of the needed easements for construction of the above referenced project. Five parcels are affected by the easement acquisitions. Two have been settled as of this date and the remaining three are being pursued through condemnation, One of the property owners, Mr. John Mattson, is reluctant to meet with the court appointed commissioners and has not granted a right -of - entry which would allow construction to commence du:ri ng ' the proceedings, roceedi n s . The Minnesota Department of Transportation will not commence plan and specification review until the City has an actual date that thero ert can be entered for p p Y construction. Under the normal acquisition procedure this date is 90 days Y after the commissioners make their findings. Since Mr. Mattson will not acknow- ledge a hearing date and the commissioners will not schedule a mandatory date we are proposing to use the "Quick Take" procedure which will allow entrance onto the property 90 days after filing with the court. The filing must include an escrow account equal to the offered settlement. We are, therefore, requesting that to avoid any further delay in -'the project schedule that the City Council authorize the escrowing of $4,200,.00 with the court to allow for the "Quick Take" procedure, _ .- -� 7 1 •' ,,:ice" •• . IL pVN. q .. � • , � � _ r,J,7G'a y. � . „"F, 1� .- .. � ; a ,��, � ., tax � `'�� 1, i .. ,�, -, y�' ! — ` \ _ a_. Ar ui �1��..pc v ♦�:� .. '�a� Yir'. .- r .• ' i' � __ •ri - ,�' y<:' '�G' J+a p• ,�b `r ✓.< .rc 'Y F , ` _,.. .,ii: t ak• lc'* 1" . tfb r �l _ gF—ra:. �. _ �»• T. Y� gel .i .ray=.Jnr �..�.' "•'^^` .. �,• � �.� � 1T" lotW �. 1. � � ar#� + ri �"- • °- '�'` •"fie•---^. t st �� `� ,�V'"' !� _�`, ,i ;t.A' .^ji.`�e•-.n� • -! l ) J " '� ~^ 1'_. X n ri'R; h.�yF• _ ,x':yR, 1 _.—. - __ '.aiY g y.,�' . ' _ mit, � "-� `i1' , °.�' �'�'!«; t2 r � - y r. 'a.• . dr tX �` •3 a os �� , \ ,� j , L'thol �c h .� .. '� � ..� •x is •{^' r _ ,�- - _ � ,� - Sir �`��, • v � , 'V' J " "moi ,i� �V ^._. • + � '( C n� �- `�"'� .� 1�, .s I ;,, p ' � , _ ,. 1St?" �� • 'E` ;;� � do�,;,;��„� ./[ \ ,•�_.. fes: - �Q,r'R•+^-.—•.,..r' • . �. INN yam.._ �F 'A / 1 ` \ /� . ,�" :! •,;.•-�� _ • - ,,,,....r,,, i-, �;:Ji.- 'aVF• '�4C �,; �f�,'�„!, ,,� � p: .,;T,y�p+ . a � `` � �t� r ^�. i { (/1, � ` / {`\\\ �� r��.--- 1 •j .^� �•"1 � � •' ��^ � ,•: j J1 �;�"�'4 Y' �i Y �� rFf. - , � - '' L. i �Lam.. ' �_ _ r-. .__...- _', '' .Wv'.a'" _ �+.�i.-`�h� /i.r.� .AYx. _ .�. _,L_.._ _ _•1' _ ±'fie'-_ _ _ •�•-� .f,.'- .x ''_.x. irY ��$[: .. Jnr j'.,,. i'i� { ,,'b`' 'rs�:.•,�'a.,� ' .k.• - . .t .3�•_ Air- - '-_�_ ; .7 `� i �. _ ',`, 4a Af.T. - :fi:'"�:u�Yi. a... ` kl: .yY'r ,� -. ?:.,"',,..` - .�� "q y�, ♦t yd. •t a ! , �_ .mow......_ � t -,, ' '•S �sw��•m� , i v — • ,v Tr Y . Y Y�'•b 7-i Via. ,..1.- �. ,, l— .� a -� -� mac.' *" �'`' �.-- i- �'!rt VOW., �- '� r i �• ..+� <: _ _ r. � R;� ,>�"•. - _ .. \ \ ,e. ✓y ! ^%"r1C �`" s. < a+, �- •}{4ti _ C •• t _.' - 1. � ,. r —•-- /' ��+�. ,�=+r•� � _ _ '� ,. .-. .. -. ti _ :.• � v� .•its �" .. r , .ir•••mq -�-. �- _. 1 '. t+.. '� - •.i � Jam. \ ..� •uW �i � 1 - � � 'a�, 1 ' �l ,C�. 64 • � `•� : • � '� •h �� . .alp .� �.+ a 4W j I t !/ 1R•."' \ { ri nom` T::AA ,r 5 ...+ R'ra" t,. k �` f � (/(/P `yam, �y T• / � � ..+�•�* � '-1 y- -� � � r/ ' Pjr: - ' s •. £ f -'SrP' t"` . _ "ori a r , '1 a / , r r r ss. .►_ :�.� alr ' Nil— Molt (ff k lk_ 41 ,i+•• ` L � .� :n k o w - .f"-' �I t• 'Q`wra,S�,irb .�. -.J, ,•�_ Ms k. �... .�_ '' � * �.i �>. , :� - s 1►' fY ��.. c'�' ode. f- i1 . � �� ;1� i �' •^-- - " 7 s } y fit.!,�• y .tom^,_ p{ .k^Ar r` • d .CAS. "'�'1^'9i`_... .. • ' ?5• �` v � i r. t J ,r, •nom 1 \ `:.. �� % - •y w it � � arrt,��'��' � `'' MR . A.: i '•%`�• MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner Johnson SUBJECT: Special Exception Permit Renewal PROJECT: Pizza Time Theater LOCATION: Maplewood East Mall APPLICANT: Royal Development DATE: December 13, 1982 Action by Council: Endorsed- 1Ao dif y e d_ ___ Rejected—___ Dalu- Re uest Renew the Pizza Time Theater special exception permit to continue to permit token -operated games and amusements. According to the police chief, the presence of these video games has not resulted in any problems which are a concern of the city. As such, the permit should be renewed. 10-1-81: Council approved a speci al exception for. Pizza Time Theater to permit the operation of video games, subject to 1. All required licenses for operation shall be obtained from the city. 2. Thispermit may be renewed by the City Council. after one year of operation, provided there -have been no problems caused by the facility. Recommendation Renewal of the Pizza Time Theater special exception permit to allow token -operated games and amusements for a period of five years. Council may again renew the permit upon request provided there have been no nuisance problems associated with the game facilities. Jw Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3: Site Plan Map • 4. Resolution • r 5 WHITE BEAR LAKE " 68 ------------ COUNTY ROAD ! �0` 11 GALL AYEJ w00DLYNN A4) (4) = t1) FURNESS 13) t2� Si t6) CT. osA 4 AJYE LY DI A RID y wtSTAND 1 = J • LA BEAM • :; •.;.• ..• [-=lmApLEvIL,w (1.) MAPLE LANE 68 (Z .) CHI PPE WA . CIRCLE (3.) CHIPPEWA AVE. NORTH ST. PAUL IIEDGEMILL RD. z DEMONT ta_ AVE. z W •: LAE _ • v, UA �� !1 !h AVE. INT AV 92VAII AV 36 &15 TL Ft EN AVE.':•: OPE AVE. JLARK AVE. 1- ]... Z cc kAU RD a Z AVE. D Oki fi5 W ... IF_ 25 IJIU F�X MAP 1 LOCATION MAP ' n L Q• o.00 ,tic If .. s SS 1!_�LLYDIA • � I«f.tt•�s= R.•l7l1P sd •✓11.11' • A Apr• IJt - It. w tsa./f 8d.1� :;:� f.*_ o '.� t • 8.:• ob ., . ow/ $3 p o►.c_. .� Ohl ► R - 30.00- 90 y _ 16 • OITTLOT A • " ; ti� CONCOR_DIA ARMS tv ' - �. ,; P • -30.00' j � � 0 c _ ..... i � ' t . "t 1 . { r, �o Off. ias' ----------- .,d :r• . :titi :z:,•. ; • - ;�j..•:•i!'lJ-�►' er-sy B. 9% off. 14 SAPLE1�OOD h�ALL ,Wes. . ..... 7 _ -W LAG E OF MAPLEWC - CITY PARK - - :.:`� f - •_ _ 3 O W X Z E Le------------ i °� - �� =� • .,� UNDEVELOPED Cr - - - co tv CLI S tS'I7'PB+► mac, W *• ;w Az R ) '-' ellIIIIIIII'3 t - is "''° a '' �► BEAM AVENUE ---4:---- � 3 f •- ' A31 1 t Do DO 4�. A4 • j•. 1.G4eaG_ to. do .GBat•• S -t 3 Elf) - �• - - _ to3.8 � a aQ'�-• oto `- _ � )4 -40 5D 4 tD 50 - Out . t 0 OrC. • • MAP 2 PROPERTY LINE MAP • i • • mss' _ 6 %J ' t .. - 4aw - _ -00 • 1� at 41b 0 say 0 - do its _mac / ;rr � v•}' ;� }'' • ..4' -i - ' � U r7-.lcm da • _ : 1 - i lb rs 40. ui lb cc � �, i T %t- � —� � ice- ..•.. � :-�-•��••� 1 , al 77 it off 1. � ' • � �•_ ; • •_ • • � • •• -� 1 �� • w" � • • A. PIZZA • - TIME t • \ �1 , • �� >,- THEATRE rb ` ... '�' � . Jc• >� 1• ; � :� fly: romp 7 It op •� II • • • •• • I MAP 3 SITE, PLAN .... Action on by ccunc n - ANDUM • 0: Ci . FROM: Endorsed -.,— City Manager Mod -L -L .. . OM : Associate ..�..._. SUBJECT: P1 anner-- Johnson Rei ecied.�._. HRA Housing pro o s �`. DATE: DeCe P a1- . Fi rs t -Time Home Date_-�- ----------- December Z9, 1982 a Buyer Program Re uest Ratify the amount t o f local contribution program tion to the 9 as established b t Fi rs t- Ti me Home Buyer application, Y he City Mara er - � in the Program round On December 13, 19829 Council a r s submittal to the Mi pp 4Ved the FTHB program approval. Al Minnesota Housing Finan and authorized . so, to insure the co Finance Agency (MHFAj for contributions the Cit confidentiality of the amount of local o Council ratification zed to establish the on on January 1Q, 1983. a amount, On December 30, 19 The 1982,9 the FTHB a 1 i '- City Manager established PP cation was submitted 1 shed the local contributionted to the MHFA. ($191473,547) of ofdeveloper the proposed bond at .15.8 percent UP -front Bevel o er issue. These fund p t p and 1 ender commitment s are to consist to be generated b fees Y the two proposed seniors' and the tax -increment The Cit wit p s' Y 1 be notified on wood's program will or before Februar 1 tax- 1 recei ve a Portion Y1983 whether Ma exempt bonding authority.p on of the $27.5' m• .Ple-9million ion i n available abl e Recommendation Ratify a local contribution on to the 19 program of 15.8 percent 83 Maplewood Firs _ ' i$1,147,5.42First-Time Home Buyer , as establish Y ed by the C� ty Mana ger. jW . t • Oma` tE MEMORANDUM The remaining and final payment to U.D. Contracting, Inc. is in the amount of $11,743.36. The arbitration award was in favor of the City's position and we,therefore, recommend that the City Council approve the work as performed and authorize final payment. .Action b r ^ �:�'�. . Encu � � v. ,�.�..� ...«...:.........w TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer Re `,,v.,_:-.,, ~� DATE: January 3, 1983 Da J_ SUBJECT: North Hazelwood Park. Final Payment Project No. 80-2 The contractor, U. D. Contracting, Inc. , through arbitration, did claim $25,840.43 in extra work which consisted of the following: Equipment $189975.00 Labor 19651.62 Retainage 39006.31 plus interest Additional work for subgrade corrections on the parking lot 19,847.50 Subcontractor work 360.00 . TOTAL CLAIM 25,840.43 The American Arbitration Association awarded the $3,006.31 for retainage only. In addition to the retainage there is $8,737.05 for a portion of the bituminous work that has not been paid to date. A summary of the project construction costs are as -follows: Original contract amount $61,038.25 Amendment No. 1 + 65164.70 Adjustment of quantities from plan to actual + 19660.24 + 68 , 86 3.19 The remaining and final payment to U.D. Contracting, Inc. is in the amount of $11,743.36. The arbitration award was in favor of the City's position and we,therefore, recommend that the City Council approve the work as performed and authorize final payment. 91 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND ORDERING FINAL PAYMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to an amended written contract approved by the City on June 4, 1981, U. D. Contracting Inc. of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota has completed Maplewood Improvement Project 80-02 in • accordance with said amended contract, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA. The work completed under said amended.contract is hereby accepted and approved, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt i n ful 1. Action by Gou.nci Endorsed Modified_ MEMORANDUM REected--� T o: Barry Evans City Manager Dat e____��.�. From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Services Date : December 22, 1982 Subj : 1983 Fee Schedule for Reservation of Park Facilities The Maplewood Park and Recreation Commission at their Decem- ber 13, 1982, meeting discussed the 1983 Fee -Schedule for Reservation of Park Facilities. They recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed schedule at their January 10, 1983, meeting. The staff has refined phrases and clarified classifications. With the completion of the soccer facilities at Hazelwood Park, we are also including a new soccer tournament fee struc- ture. Upon occasion we have had requests for field rentals for leagues or games other than tournaments and we have therefore created a new section to cover these requests. See item #7. Changes for 1983 as compared to 1982 for softball tournaments include the following: 1982 1983 Marking Compound $3.00 $3.50 Light/Field/Hour 12.00 13.50 Garbage. Pickup/Field 10.00 Damage/Cleanup Deposit 35.00 100.00 Key Deposit 25.00 Community Services Staff (per hour) 5.00 7.00 For rental of our skating rinks or hockey facilities after our normal skating hours, the fees for lights and supervision are increased from $12.00 per hour to $17.50 per hour. We recommend that the fee for special puppet shows be increased from $60.00 per show to $65.00. Enc. (1) 1983 Fee Schedule 144 .. Am. A 1983 FEE SCHEDULE RESERVATION OF PARK FACILITIES 1) Daylight Athletic Field reservations, including rinks and fields, are free.. This does not include use for Tournaments or League games. 2) Light charge for use of lights at Wakefield and Goodrich Park will be $13.50 per hour. Light charge for use of lights at Hazelwood Park will be $.17.00 per hour.. Charge for use of rink lights will be $8.00 per hour/rink, except for the large rink at Wakefield Park, which gill be $13.50/hour. 3) Tournaments held in Maplewood: A. All Tournaments 1..Motorized vehicles are not.allowed on the park property. 2. All games must be completed by 10:00 p.m. with.all people out of the park by 10:30 p.m* 3. Rental fees must be paid one week in advance of the first scheduled date of the tournament. 4. Tournament flyer and rules must be turned into Community Services two weeks in advance of the tournament. 5. Maplewood Community Services retains the right to cancel any tournament due to field conditions or inappropriate conduct of Tournament Director or participants. 6. -Parking lots are to be cleaned along with the fields and surrounding grounds. B. Softball Tournaments: I. Must be sanctioned by MRPA or USSSA. 2. Maple Leaf Officials Association will have exclusive rights to work any tournaments held in Maplewood. 3. No games may start at Wakefield #1 before 11:00 a.m. on Sundays. C. Fee structure for State,.Regional or National Tournaments will be decided separately. 4) Classification of Groups Wishing To Use Facilities: Group A: City sponsored groups, local youth groups, athletic groups and local community service organizations Group B: Local private groups, teams or organizations' Group C: Outside teams, groups or organizations 5) Softball Tournament Fee Structure: Grou A Group B Group C a. Field Use (Per Field/Day) N/C $25.00 $40.00 b. Marking Compound (Per Bag) $3.50 3.50 3.50 c. Park Shelter (Per Day) N/C 25.00 25.00 d. Lights (Per Hour/Field) 13.50 13.50 13.50 e. Hollywood Bases (Per Set/Day) N/C 5.00 5.00 f. Field Liner, Drags, Shovels b Rakes N/C N/C N/C g. Garbage Pickup (Per Field Used) 10.00 10.00 10.00 h. Damage/Cleanup Deposit 100.00 200.00 100.00 I. Key Deposit 25.00 25.00 25.00 J. Community Services Staff (Per Hour) -7.00 7.00 7.00 6) Soccer Tournament Fee Structure: Grou A Group B GroupC a. Field Rental (Per Field/Day) 1�/C $25.00 $40.00 b. Marking Compound (Per Bag) $3.50 .3.50 3.50 c. Hazelwood Lights (Per Hour) 17.00 17.00 17.00 d. Lining of Soccer Field (Per IField) 18.00 18.00 18.00 e. Soccer Nets (Per Pair/Day) N/C 5.00 5.00 f. Garbage Pickup(Per Field Used) 10.00 10.00 10.00 S, Damage/Cleanup Deposit 100.00 100.00 100.00 h. Key Deposit 25.00 .25.00 25.00 I. Community Services Staff (Per Hour)7.00 7.00 7.00 J. Portable Toilet (Necessary if more than 8 teams) Fee to be determined. 7) All field rentals for leagues or games other than tournaments: A. !City sponsored groups, local youth groups, athletic groups and local community service organizations - No Charge B. Local private groups, teams or organizations* - $10.00/game Co Outside teams, groups or organizations - $25.00/game * To qualify as a local team, group or organization, at least at SOX of the- siembers of that group, team or organization must be Maplewood residents. Proof of residence must be brought to the Community Services Office by each individual; in addition a team roster must be brought in to us for our files. s 8) Rink permits will be granted to City groups.fors special skating p g or acts vi ties only during hours not normally scheduled for public skating at a fee of. $17.50/hour for supervisor and li ht.in p g g rental fee. 9) Puppet Shows for specs al 'showings by the C� t Traveling n Puppet Theatre $65.00/show.. y 9 pp AS PREVIOUSLY DAMSTATED,. ALL GROUPS, WILL BE REQUIRED' TO MAKE A$100,00 AGE DEPOSIT WITH THE.OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES. RENTING GROUPS ARE RESPON- SIBLE TO MAKE SURE ALL TRASH IS PUT IN TRASH RECEPTACLES FOR PARK CREWS TO COLLECT. IF PARK AREAS ARE LEFT CLEAN AND IN GOOD REPAIR, THE $100.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT WILL BE RETURNED. ALL GAMES UNDER THE LIGHTS AT WAKEFIELD, GOOD RICH, AND HAZELWOOD PARKS ARE SUBJECT `T.O LIGHT FEES AS PREVIOUSLY STATED. THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESERVES THE RIGHT EITHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE, TO OPERATE CONCESSION FACILITIES AT PUBLIC PARKS WHERE TOURNAMENTS AND SIMILAR.EVENTS ARE BEING HELD. GROUPS MAY PURCHASE CONCESSION RIGHTS FOR A FEE OF125.00 PER EACH $ THREE DAY TOURNAMENT. FOR THE SALE OF BEER, A TEMPORARY 3.2 LICENSE MUST BE .PURCHASED THROUGH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE IN.CITY HALL, IN ADDITION, EACH APPLICANT MUST HAVE ADEQUATE INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR ANY LIABILITIES THAT MAY BE INCURRED. ALL CONCESSIONS AT WAKEFIELD #1 MUST 'BE SOLD THROUGH THE "J . C. " CONCESSION NCESSION STAND, CONCESSIONS AT GOODRICH MUST BE SOLD. THROUGH CONCESSION STAND LOCATED IN THE PARK BUILDING. A -NY BEER WAGONS, VANS, OR TRUCKS MUST BE LOCATED IN PARKING LOTS 0 NLY, AND CANNOT REMAIN ON THE PARK PROPERTY OVERNIGHT. THROUGH THIS POLICY, THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE, AT THE APPLYING GROUP'S EXPENSE, THE ASSIGNMENT OF A COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF MEMBER TO BE PRESENT DURING THE DURATION OF THE EVENT. STAFF MEMBER WILL PREPARE THE FIELDS AT THE START OF. EACH TOURNA- MENT DAY ONLY. STAFF PERSON, IS ASSIGNED TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF COM- MUNITY SERVICES. FAILURE TO MEET ANY OR ALL OF THESE CONDITIONS WILL RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF THE $100.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT. ALL.GROUPS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAY IN FULL ANY AND ALL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THEFT OR VANDALISM TO ANY EQUIPMENT OR FACILITIES USED DURING THE RENTAL PERIOD. 4 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Shorel and. Ordinance DATE: January 3, 1983 Action by Council: Endorsed— Modified-.- R e j e c t e .%-'.- .._.., ----- Date- ., Council considered this ordinance on November 22 and tabled action until January 10 to notify affected undeveloped property owners and to receive a review from the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). This review is enclosed. Based on the SCS comments,staff met with the Department of Natural Resources (_DNR) and added new wording to section 36-566 (e) on page seven. This wording is general to accommodate changes in technology and specific adaptations. Staff will be meeting with the DNR and SCS in the near future to prepare a specific list of management practices that would qualify fora bonus. SCS letter Staff report cc: John Stine, DNR Tom Petersen, SCS RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINNESOTA SOIL ANDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS December 16, 1982 To: Geoff Olson, Director of Community Services From: Tom Petersen, Conservation Specialis Subject: Review of the proposed Shorela.nd Management Ordinance. Mid-America Bank Building 1827 North Saint Paul Road Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Telephone (612) 777-0127 Upon review of the proposed ordinance and from phone conversations with city staff, it appears that the proposed ordinance will improve the permitting process adjacent to protected waters. This ordinance in tandem with the new environmental ordinance should address the issues of soil erosion and water quality degradation. The major concern I have With the ordinance is that . of allowing bonus impervious area based on a stormwater treatment facility. At this point in time, there are very few proven effective measures to negate all of the pollutants associated with impervious area stormwater runoff. It may be appropriate to withhold this bonus procedure until standards and specifications are recognized by the DNR and other appropriate agencies to evaluate the potential effectiveness of a proposed treatment facility. At this time, I would.not consider a shallow detention structure a complete pollution abatment facility. cc. Ramsey -Wash. Metro Watershed District RSWCD Supervisors DNR, John Stine r �" AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Q�� 1 a MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner --Johnson SUBJECT: Shoreland liana ement Ordinance DATE: January 3, 198 _ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL 1. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has requested that the City comment on their preliminary shoreland classifications for -thirteen lakes and two streams in Maul ewood. 2. The DNR is requiring adoption of a shoreland management ordinance, based upon their Model Shoreland Overlay District Ordinance for Municipalities. CONCLUSION Analysis DNR's classification scheme and model ordinance were not conceived with the • metropolitan area in mind. With land use planning mandatory and sanitary and storm sewer systems common in the metropolitan region, some problems arise as to the applicability and public purpose of some of the model shoreland development requirements. The enclosed. ordinance represents several months of negotiation between DNR and City Staff. The ordinance has been approved by DNR. (See enclosed letter.) If Council wishes to make any revisions, DNR approval will be required. Significant revisions agreed upon between the DNR and Staff include: I. An expansion from three to five lake classification categories to take into account factors such as: public ownership, planned land use, and remaining development potential in shoreland areas. A provision for an impervious surface area bonus has also been included to add greater flexibility, where . developer is willing to construct on-site facilities for the treatment or reduction of urban runoff. 10 2. Relaxation of DNR's maximum thirty percent impervious surface a rea requirement for all development. A compromise was reached allowing increased impervious surface areas dependent upon the lake classification, and whether a water frontage or a back lot property. 3. Relaxation in development standards for properties that would be separated from a protected water by an arterial roadway. 4. DNR's definition of planned unit development was revised to eliminate their approval authority for multiple dwelling developments which -would not vary from the shoreland ordinance provi s i ons . 5. "Minimum lot area" was revised to "average lot area." Where only one -lot would be involved, the "average lot area" requirement would be the minimum allowable. This approach meets the intent of the .State legislation governing shoreland densities, while reducing the number of time consuming minor variance requests. The remainder of the development standards, with minor excepton, are as required in DNR's model shoreland guidelines. The changes outlined above would eliminate overly restrictive requirements relative to Mapl ewood' s shoreland areas, while maintaining the spirit and intent of the shoreland legislation. _ The. effect on developed properties would be minimal. Any lawful structure caused to be sub- standard, due to the enactment of the proposed shoreland ordinance, would be a-1 l owed to expand, provided that the substandardness would not be increased. Lots of record could be developed, provided the shoreland ordinance provisions would be met so far as practical . Recommendation I. Approve the following Department of Natural Resource (DNR) preliminary shoreland classifications for Maplewood's thirteen lakes and two streams that frave been designated as protected waters: Basin DNR Preliminary Classification (see background information) Beaver Lake NE Casey's Lake RD Carver Lake RD Gervais Lake- GD NE --Natural Environmental Keller Lake RD RD --Recreational Devel opme Kohlman Lake RD GD --General Development Lake Phalen RD - Oeh rl i ne' s Lake RD Round Lake NE Silver Lake RD Spoon Lake RD Tanners. Lake GD Wakefield Lake RD Battle Creek GD Fish Creek GD 3M Pond GD II. Approve the enclosed shoreland ordinance. .) - 2 - BACKGROUND a Purpose of Shoreland Management Shoreland management requirements were enacted by the Legislature to reduce the negative effects of shoreland overcrowding and uncontrolled development, such as: shoreland erosion, increased pollution, flood damages, and inadequate area for on- site sanitary facilities. Definition of Shoreland - and Applicability 1. By statute, shoreland is defined as: a. 1000 feet from the normal high water mark of a pond, lake, or wetland b. 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward side of a designated floodplain, whichever is greater 2. For administrative purposes, the DNR only requires shoreland regul ati ons for the fol 1 owi ng waters: a. lakes or ponds in excess of ten acres b. streams or rivers with .watersheds in excess of . two square miles Shoreland Management Classifications The three shoreland classifications are defined as follows (source: "Classification Scheme for Public Waters, DNR, April 1971"): 1. Natural Environmental Lakes and Streams (NE): to preserve and enhance high quality waters ' by protecting them from pollution- and to protect shorel ands which are unsuitable for development; to maintain a Tow density of development; and to maintain high standards of quality for permitted development. 2. Recreational Development Lakes (RD): to provide management policies reasonably consistent with existing development and use; to provide for the beneficial use of public waters by the general public, as well as the riparian owners; to provide a balance between the lake resource and lake use; to provide for a balance between the lake resource and lake use; to provide for. a multiplicity of lake uses; and to protect areas unsuitable for residential and commercial uses from development. 3. General Development Lakes and Streams (GD): to provide minimum regulations of areas presently developed as high densi ty,mul ti pl a use areas; and to provide guidance for future growth of commercial and industrial establishments which require locations on public waters. Hi story 1969: The State Legislature enacted the Shoreland Management Act, requiring each county to adopt a shoreland management ordinance for unincorporated areas. 7-1-73: The State Legislature amended the Shoreland Management Act (Statute 105.485) to require the regulation of shoreland areas within municipalities. 9-21-81: DNP, notified Maplewood that the existing zoning code did not meet the intent of the Shoreland Act and that a shoreland ordinance must be adopted by September 21, 1982. - 3 - 10-15-81: Council adopted DNR`s Model Shoreland Overlay District Ordinance for Muni ci pal i ti es, shorel and development guideline. 10-1-82: DNR approved the ordinance as proposed by Staff (letter enclosed) mb Enclosures: . 1. Map of DNR Proposed Shorel and 1 Management Basins 2. Table 1 --DNR Preliminary Shorel and Cl assi fi.cations 3. Table 2 --DNR Preliminary Classification Criteria 4. Proposed Ordi nan.ce 5. DNR ` s Letter of Approval _ 4 _ This rr%lr) is for planning purposes only and should not be, used where precise meast gement is required L-4 LITTLI! CANADA q 1 1 1 R.. DNR PROPOSED SHORELAND MANAGEMENT BASINS G I D General Development RD Recreational Development NE Natural Environment MAP I two now P'1VWCji(' �.ht •+t mft'"I 11,�� 3=t - - . - 4111- 14slope, fit 1 $2 10 0 ""0 qt too T"s tow LAW 11 U "fte 401" —_ 'a some I tow"" We RD NORTH 97. PAUL DI tA III . .2 3M r__. i Z=j fit 1 $2 10 0 ""0 qt too T"s tow lot 0."• f1lb"I list OEM qtr „tr F, t" L nL It fI 9"1 I too RI� rij A -3-,& Y tLy- 0 wAsNt�o�of1 co "twPowy TABLE I DNR PRELIMINARY SHORELAND CLASSI FI CATIONS Crowding 60 acres niN1ClPAI SI1ORELAND CLASSIFICATION DATA Potential City of _ MAPLEWOOD area per 1DL•l1TIFICATION BASIN CHARACTF-RISTICS EXISTING DF.YEMPHENT CLASSIFICATION INFO. winterkill- Ecological roughfish or Classification c o Z n 9 mz rm� mo 7D � o t� r c ir► n ti. Z� V!n y .. n mon La n c «. o� - cv�r ��Df�csf c g o r 9" O 4,rn pp n y or wet soil, rtee - � r 0zc-C Mir c t -i LOCJlTION ro SNORE i tOi� t- t�i - r- O ... to r- O .. «.. to g . - ry- n 7 l I:I ME 7O T It] SECTI ONS AREA MI LES Ira - i Silver 62-1 68A 2.1 18 0 0 9.5 32.3 RD - (a7 taseys 62-5 14 .6 6 17 0 0 N922/F925 28.3 23.3 RD Kohl ma+n 62_6 84 .6 6 20 0 O - N959/F963.6 33.3 140.0 RD (a) Gervais 62-7 234 2.8 41 70 0 0 H959/F963.6 25.0 83-6 GO 72 1.7 6 20(b) 0 0 N959/F963.6 11.8 42.4 RD Kel 1 er 62-10 ► 23 .8 8 15 0 0 19.8 28.8 RD Wakefield 62-11 • - i 23 .6 19 O(b) 0 0 N959.0/F963.6 -- 38.3 W Round 62-12 a193 Phalen b2-13 3.2 70 Otb} 0 0 N959.0/F963.6 --6003 RD 11 .6 -- 22 0 0 36.6 18.3 RD Unnamed 62-14 Oehrl fine's Lake - is weaver 62-16 65 1.3 7 10 - 0 0 N950/F952.2 7.7 50.0 HE 62 17 3M Pond 24 Unnamed - 1.1 -- O 0 4 N976.7/F979.9 3.6 21.8 GD N/A Spoon Lake (c) • (a)Tanners - 82-115 73 1.69 45 48 O 4 N963.1/F965.4 28.4 43.2 -&D a Carver 82-166 95 1.3 36 7 1 0 N906.2/ F910.i 5.4 73.1 RD . 4 STREAM NAME GD (a) Battle Creek _ _ (a) -.Fish Creek 5D (a)Water.body bordered by at least one other local unit of government, data given for the entire water body (b)No private riparian property (c)Included by DNR with the classification of Keller Lake • All rivers and streams having a total drainage area of greater than 2 square miles are assigned a shoreland classification of General Development TABLE II -- DNR PRELIMINARY CLASSIFICATION -CRITERIA RANK OF CRITERIA NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT 1 2 3 4 - S 6 under two under three Development dwellings dwellings Density per mile per mile between 3 under three and 25 dwellings dwellings per mile per mile of shoreline between 60 and 225 acres of water -per mile NOT winterkill- roughfish or bullhead- panfish over 1S feet deep sand or loam soil, decidious or coniferous veg., moderate to steep slopes over 25 between 3 and dwellings 2S dwellings per mile of per mile of shoreline shoreline greater than 225 acres of water per mile NOT winterkill- roughfish or bullhead- panfish over 1S feet deep sL -id or loan soil, decidious or coniferous veg., moderate to steep slopes less than Crowding 60 acres Potential of water area per mile winterkill- Ecological roughfish or Classification bullhead- panfish under 15 Lake Depth feet deep few trees Shore Soil shrub vege- i Vegetation tation, clay or wet soil, flat slopes between 3 under three and 25 dwellings dwellings per mile per mile of shoreline between 60 and 225 acres of water -per mile NOT winterkill- roughfish or bullhead- panfish over 1S feet deep sand or loam soil, decidious or coniferous veg., moderate to steep slopes over 25 between 3 and dwellings 2S dwellings per mile of per mile of shoreline shoreline greater than 225 acres of water per mile NOT winterkill- roughfish or bullhead- panfish over 1S feet deep sL -id or loan soil, decidious or coniferous veg., moderate to steep slopes ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO INCLUDE A SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS F-OLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances is amended to add _ Article IX as follows: ARTICLE I X . SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 36-561. Purpose and intent. (a) It is the purpose of this ordinance to provide for the wise uti 1 i zati on of shorel and areas, in order to protect water quality, the natural characteristics and visual appeal of protected, waters, the local tax base, and the general health, safety and welfare of community residents. (b) Enactment of this ordinance is to provide a mechanism to reduce the negative effects of shorel and overcrowding, such as water pollution, inadequate space on lots for drainage and sanitary facilities, flood • damages, and degradation of the aesthetic appeal and natural character- istics haracter- istics of- designated shorel and and adjacent water areas. Sec. 36-562. Establishment of a shorel and overlay district. (a) A shoreland overlay district, with its attendant regulations, is hereby established as part of the zoning ordinance. This district shall overlay existing zoning districts, so that any parcel of land lying in the overlay district shall also lay in one or more of the underlying established zoning districts. (b) Within the overlay district, all uses may be permitted in accordance with regulations for the underlying zoning district(s), if the uses meet the additional requirements established in this ordinance. Sec. 36-563. District boundaries. This overlay ordinance shall apply to the shorel and districts which are delineated on the official zoning maps. These maps shall be on file in the office of the director of community development for inspection and copying. Sec. 36-564. Definitions. Average lot area: The average of the lot areas within a single development or phase. For a single lot, the minimum allowable area shall be no less than, the average lot area requirement. Boathouse: A structure used solely for the storage of boats or boating equipment. Building of record: A structure which was in existence or for which a building permit was issued prior to (effective date of this ordinance). Lot of record: A lot recorded with the Ramsey County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles prior to (effective date of this ordinance) Multiple Dwelling: Any residential structure containing two or more living units. - Nonpoi nt source (NPS)..pollutant: A contaminant that enters water by washing g off the land or seeping into ground water, which alters the physical, chemical, or biological properties of water or the discharge into water of any substance that may create a nuisance or render such water detrimental o- injurious to public health, safety or welfare, Nonpoint source (NPS) pollutant treatment: Storm water management practices which will reduce nonpoint source pollution prior to reaching a protected water Ordinary high water mark (OHWM): A mark delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape. The ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. Planned Unit Development: A development planned as a unit which incorporates: 1. Residential and commercial land uses, or 2.Variation (s) from this shorel and overlay ori ' . _ ordinance or underlying zoning district regulations relating to, but not limited to, density, setbacks, height limits and minimum lot area which are permitted by negotiated agreement between the developer, the municiDality, and the commissioner of natural resources, Protected waters: Formerly referred to as public waters, means any water of the state as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, subdivision 14. Regional flood: A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred in Minnesota and that can be expected to occur on an average frequency of once every 100 years. Shoreline: Land abutting the ordinary high water mark. Shorel and: Land located within the following distances from a protected water: 1. 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water mark of a 1 ake,P and or flowage; and 2. 300 feet from a river or stream, or the landward extent of a flood plain on such a river or stream, whichever is greater. The practical limits of shorelands may be less than the statutory limits, where such limits are designated by the natural drainage divides at a lesser distance and approved by the Department of Natural Resources. 2 Structure: Any building, except aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph or gas lines, including towers, poles and other supporting appurtenances. Urban run-off: Storm water that flows over -land or through a man-made drainage system, that usually contains litter, organic, or bacterial wastes. Sec. 36-565. Shorel and classifications* (a) Criteria for classification (Percentages apply only to shoreland located in Maplewood) (1) Class I waters are defined as those DNR designated General Development waters in which at least 75% of the shoreland area is planned for commercial or industrial use, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Pian. (2) Class II waters are defined as those DNR designated General Development waters not qualifying for Class I status (3) Class III wafers are defined as those DNR designated Recreation Development waters having: a. At least 60% of the shoreline in public ownership, or b. At least 50% of the shoreland in public ownership, or c. Less than 10% of the shoreland remaining for development, excluding public open space, as of (date this ordinance becomes effective) (4) Class IV waters are defined as those DNR designated Recreation Development waters not qualifying for Class III status. (5) class V waters are defined as those DNR designated Natural Environ- mental waters, (b) Classification of protected waters (1) Class I waters. 3M Pond Tanner's Lake (2) Class II waters, Battle Creek Fish Creek Gervais Lake (3) Class III waters, Casey Lake Keller Lake Lake Phalen Silver Lake Spoon Lake Wakefield Lake 3 (4) Class IV waters, Carver Lake Kohlman Lake. Oehrline's Lake (51 Class V waters, Beaver Lake Round Lake Sec.36-566. district development standards. (a) Class I waters. With (1) Commercial Development. Sanitary Sewer a. Minimum building setback from. the OHWM (feet) 50 b. Minimum on-site sewage system setback from OHWM (feet) c. Maximum Impervious surface area(% ) 50 _ with bonus(°o) * 70 (2) Multi-ple Dwelling. a. Minimum building setback from OHWM (feet) 75 b. Maximum impervious surface area {'q,) 40 60 with bonus (b) Class II and III waters, (1) Commercial Development. a. Maximum building height (stories) 4 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 c. Minimum water frontage (feet) 75 d. Minimum on-site sewage system setback from -the OHWM (feet). e. Maximum impervious surface 40 area(%) with bonus * water frontage lots(%) 50 other lots (.%) 60 c Without Sanitary Sewer 50 50 50 4 75 100 50 40 (2)Single dwelling. a. Minimum water frontage 75 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 c. Minimum on-site sewage system setback from the OHWM (feet) d. Average lot area water frontage lots (sq.ft.) 15,000 e. Maximum impervious surface area O 30 with bonus* water frontage lots. (%) 40 other lots (%) 50 (3) Multiple dwelling. a. Maximum building height (stories) 4 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 c. Minimum water frontage per development (feet) 85 d. Maximum impervious surface area O 40 with bonus* water frontage lots (q) 50 other lots (%) 60 e. Average lot area per unit water frontage lots (sq.ft.) 109000 (C) Class IV and V waters. (1) Commercial development. a. Maximum building height (stories) 3 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 c. Minimum water frontage per development (feet) 75 d. Minimum on-site sewage system setback from, the OHWM (feet) 5 100 75 50 20,000 30 3 100 150 75 e. Maximv:m impervious surface area (%) 30 30 with bonus water frontage lots (q) 40 other lots 50 (2) Single dwelling. - a. Minimum water frontage and lot width at building setback line (feet) 75 150 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWR1 (feet) 75 100 c. Minimum on-site sewage system setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 d. Average lot area water frontage lots (sq.ft.) 20,000 409000 other lots (sq. ft.) 159000 409000 e. Maximum impervious surface area(%) 30 30 with bonus* water frontage lots (%) 40 other lots (q) 50 (3) Nu1 ti pl e dwelling. a. Maximum building height (stories) 3 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 c. Minimum water frontage per development (feet) $5 d. Maximum impervious surface area (%) 40 with bonus* water frontage lots (%) 50 other lots (%) 60 e. Average lot area per unit water frontage lots (sq.ft.) 159000 other lots (sq.ft.) 59000 * Refer to section 36-506(e)for requirements to qualify for an impervious surface area bonus. Impervious surface arealimits shall be determined using the total developable area of a parcel (above the ordinary high water mark and suitable for development), exclusive of streets and sidewalks. 6 (d) Roads and parking areas. (1) Roads and parking areas shall be designed and located so as to retard urban run-off. (2) Where practical and feasible, all roads and parking areas shall meet the structure setback standards from the ordinary high water mark specified in section 36-566 (a), (b) and (c). In no instance shall these impervious surfaces be located less than -fifty feet from the ordinary high water mark. . (3) Natural- vegetation or other natural materials shall be used to screen _ parking areas when viewed from the water. (e) Impervious surface area bonus. .To qualify for an impervious surface area bonus, as permitted in section 36-566 (a), (b) and (c),' significant man-made facilities shall be provided and maintained for the reduction of storm water flow or the treatment of urban run-off for nonpoi nt source water pollutants. The director of public works shall determine whether a proposed manage- ment practice(s) 'is adequate to warrant a bonus using criteria adopted by the city council and approved by DNR. The criteria will be subject to revision from time to time taking into account the most recent technology. A bonus may range from one to twenty percent for nonwater frontage lots and from one to ten percent for water frontage properties, dependent upon the practice (s) proposed. The director of public works shall forward a copy of proposed bonuses to the DNR for review and comment. (f) tater quality management plan. (1) All development within a shoreland area shall be subject to a water quality management plan, which is to be approved prior to construction by the director of public works, except single and double dwellings meeting the following criteria: a. The parcel is not part of a plat created after (effective date' of this ordinance) . b: The parcel does not have frontage on a protected water (2) A water quality management plan shall include, but not be limited to, a statement of the construction and effective maintenance of non - point source pollutant treatment methods to be used to reduce potential water pollution associated with: a. Urban run-off b. Soil erosion after construction is complete, and c. Soil erosion during construction. These methods shall be in addition to any significant man-made facilities proposed for an impervious surface area bonus as permitted by section 36-566 (e). 7 (g� Elevation of the lowest floor. Where no regulatory flood protection elevation has been established, no structure, except boathouses, piers and docks, shall be placed at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including basement, is less than three feet above the highest known water level. In those instances where sufficient data on known high water levels are not available, the ordinary high water mark shall be used. (h) Drainage. All development within shoreland areas shall be consistent with the intent of the Maplewood Drainage Plan, dated January 1974. (i) Exemption from setback requirements. Se,tback requirements from the ordinary high water mark shall not apply to boathouse, piers and docks. Location of piers and docks shall be controlled by applicable state and local regulations. (i) Reduc�,ion in development standards. Where a shorel and property is --a) separated from all protected waters by a principal or major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan, b) the area does not drain directly to a protected water, and c) the visual impact of the area from the lake surface is minimal, all applicable development standards may be reduced in restrictiveness by one protected waters classification. (i.e., Property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II development standards.) (k) Substandard lots and buildings. (1 } Lots of record, not meeting the minimum lot area requirements of this shorel and overlay ordinance, may be allowed as a building site, provided all other dimensional requirements of this shorel and overlay ordinance are complied with insofar as practical. (2) A building of record, which is caused to be substandard due to the enactment of this ordinance, may be expanded, provided that: a. The use and expansion are ' al 1 owed by the zoning ordinance. b. Where practical and feasible, the improvements will not increase the substandardness of the building relative to the requirements of section 36-566, except as permitted in section 36-566 (k) (2) (c), or c. The setback of the structure, if a water .frontage lot, is the average setback of adjacent residential structures from the ordinary high water mark or fifty feet, whichever is greater. 8 (1) Boathouses. Boathouses may be allowed up to the OHWM provided: (1) They do not contain sanitary facilities. (2) They are not used for human habitation. _ (3) They are no larger than -160 square feet in area and one story - in height. (4) They are designed to be aesthetically compatible with the natural setting insofar as practical. Sec. 36-567. Shoreland alterations. (a) Selective removal of natural vegetation shall be allowed, provided that sufficient vegetative cover remains to screen cars, dwellings and other structures when viewed from the water for aesthetic purposes. (b) Grading and filling in shoreland areas may be authorized by a grading and fill permit. Such permit -may be granted by the director of public works, subject to the approval of an erosion control plan. At a minimum, an erosion control plan shall require that: (1) The smallest amount of bare ground is exposed fora short a time as feasible. (2) Temporary ground cover, such as mulch, is used and permanent ground cover, such as sod, is planted., (3) Methods to prevent erosion and trap sediment are employed. (4) Fill is stabilized to accepted engineering standards. (c) Excavation on shorelands where the intended purpose is connection to a protected water, shall require a permit from the director of public works before construction is begun. Permits may be obtained only after the Commissioner of Natural Resources has issued a permit for any work on the beds of protected waters. - (d) Any work which will change or diminish the course, current or cross section of a protected water or wetland shall be approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources, and such approval shall be construed to mean the issuance.by the Commissioner of Natural Resources of a permit under the procedures of Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.42 and other related statutes. Sec. 36-568. On-site sewage treatment systems. (a) All on-site sewage treatment systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards (6 MCAR 4.8040). 9 (b) All existing sewage treatment systems inconsistent with the standards in } Section 36-568. (a) shall be brought into conformance or discontinued within five years from the date of enactment of this ordinance. Any noncon- forming sanitary facility found to be a public nuisance shall be brought into conformity or discontinued within thirty days . after receiving written notice from the Maplewood environmental health official. - Sec. 36-569. Plan review. (a) Subdivisions. (1) All plats which are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance shall be reviewed by the commissioner of natural- resources. Such review shall require that the proposed plats be received by the commissioner at least ten days before city council approval of a preliminary plat. (2) A copy of all plats -within the shoreland overlay district shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources within ten days of final approval of the city council. (b) Planned Unit Developments. .(,PUD) Altered zoning standards may be allowed as exceptions to the zoning ordinance for PUD's,provided that: _ (1) Proposals must be approved by the Department of Natural Resources prior to final approval by the municipality. The Department of • Natural Resources shall have thirty days from the date of written notification from the city to reply, after which time said proposal shall be considered approved. (2) open space is preserved, that would not have been preserved without the PUD. (3) Where a density bonus is considered, the following factors are evaluated to ensure the proposed density will be consistent with the resource limitations of the protected water: a. Physical and aesthetic impact of any increased density b. Density of current development c. Amount of public shoreland and shoreline d. Levels and types of water surface use and public access e. Possible effects on over-all public use of the protected water (4) Any shoreline recreation facilities, such as beaches, docks and boat launching facilities are centralized. (5) The development is consistent with requirements fora PUD in the City Zoning Code. 1 10 (6) An approved PUD shall not be modified unless approved in writing . by the Department of Natural Resources and the city council. The Department of Natural Resources shall have thirty days from the date of written notification from the city to reply, after which time, said request shall be considered approved. (c) Multiple family and commercial developments. Nonsingle dwelling detached developments which would disturb at least one acre of shorel and, shall be submitted to the Commissioner of Natural Resources for review and comment at least ten days prior to Community Design Review Board approval. (d) Reduction of development standards. Where standards would be reduced under section 36-5660), notification of the request shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources at least ten .days prior to issuance of building permit or Community Design Review Board approval, whichever would come first. Sec. 36-570. variances and amendments. (a) A copy of public hearing notices to consider variances and amendments to the provisions of this ordinance shall be received by the commissioner of natural resources at least ten days prior to such hearings. (b) A copy of final decisions granting variances or ordinance amendments shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources within ten days of final action. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be i n force after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of 1982. Mayor Attest: Ayes - Clerk Nays - 'J STATE OF UVUv��Q ., DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 DNR INFORMATION (612) 296.6157 October 1, 1982 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Commun i►ty Development City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: APPROVAL OF MAPLEWOOD'S SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE FILE NO. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the draft shoreland management ordinance submitted by Mr. Randall Johnson on September 9, 1982 for compliance with, the "Statewide Standards and Criteria for the Management of Municipal Shorel and Areas of Minnesota" (Minn. Regs. NR 82-84). The draft ordinance is in substantial compliance with the above -noted standards, except Section 920.060, D.2. In accordance with M.S. 105.485, Subdivision 6 I hereby approve Maplewood's shorel and management controls, subject to revision of the section to read as follows: 2. Where practical and feasible, all roads and parking areas shall meet .the structure setback standards from the ordinary high water mark specified in Sections 920.060, A, B, & C of this ordinance. In no instance shall these impervious surfaces be located less than 50 feet from the ordinary high water mark. The Department appreciates the effort and initiative taken by the City of Maplewood in developing an innovative and comprehensive management approach for its . shorel and areas. As a result of this effort, the natural resources of the lakes and associated shorel ands throughout Maplewood will be protected and enhanced for future generations. Please send two (2) published or certified copies of the "Shoreland Overlay District". Section 920 of the Maplewood Mun i ci pal Code after official adoption AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER OCT P, = Mr. Geoff Olson Page 2 October 1, 1982 to the DNR for our files. Also, notices required by the ordinance to be sent to the Commissioner of Natural Resources should be sent to the DNR Region VI Waters' Office at 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55106. In the future, staff from that office will be available should you need assistance in interpreting or administering your shoreland management controls. Sincerely, D I V ISI N .DF -.-WATER S 00r A L arr eym u r Direc or -LS/SP: j 1 cc: Randall Johnson, Maplewood Associate Planner Tom Peterson, Ramsey Co. SWCD City of Little Canada Region VI Waters 4076D • MI NUTFS OF THE MAPL EWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 1, 1982, 7:30 P.M*. 1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 1, CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioner Lester Axda.hl Present (Chairman) Commissioner Richard Barrett Present Commissioner Paul Ell efson Present Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present - Commissioner Dorothy He j ny Absent Commi ssi oner William Howard Present Commissioner Edward Kishel Absent Commissioner .Joseph Pellish Present • ' Commissioner Duane Prew Absent Commissioner S1 etten Present -Ralph Commissioner David Whitcomb Present 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Barrett moved approval of the agenda as. submitted. Commissioner Ell efson seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, Ell efson, Fischer, Howard, Pel 1 i sh, S1 etten, Whitcomb 5. PUBLIC HEARING 6, VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 7. COMMUNICATIONS 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Code amendment--Shoreland Ordinance Secretary Olson said the Department of Natural Resources has requested that the City comment on their preliminary shorel and classifications for thirteen lakes and two streams in Maplewood. The DNR is also requiring adoption of a shoreland management ordinance, based upon their.Model Shorel and Overlay District Ordinance for Municipalities, The ordinance as presented in the staff report, has been approved by the DNR. John Stein from the Department of Natural Resources is present -at the meeting to answer questions. 11-1-82 John Stein, DNR, said he has been working with the City staff on the proposed ordinance, The DNR obtains their authority through, state legislation. The Commission discussed with Mr. Stein how the proposed ordinance would relate to the federal water pollution requirements. He explained from what point the setback would be measured from for the streams 1 ocated in Maplewood. Mr. Stein said the DNR will be involved in the review process of plats that would be located within the shorel and areas, The lakes that are sensitive to development will have greater setbacks, greater lot areas required, Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment on the proposed ordinance. Don Christianson, 1111 E. County Road C, suggested using the minimum lot sizes, this would help protect the lakes. He also questioned if duplexes, quads would have to have only the minimum width_ lots of 75 feet. Mr. Stein indicated the City adopts minimum lot -width standards per unit. Ma ri lyn - Vars , 1140 Beam Avenue, also would like to see minimum lot sizes. The minimums must be very precise and established by ordinance. She thought the five classifications of protected waters unnecessarily complicates the ordinance. She suggested uniformity in the categories, throughout the state. She thought the property that is separated by an arterial should not be exempt. She wished the ordinance to be more restrictive on the amount of impervious surface being allowed. The Commission discussed with staff whether there would be a problem with the additional classifications when approximately 8 of the lakes in Maplewood also abut other communities. Staff indicated the City would only administer our regulations. The Commission suggested review- ing the classifications of the lakes in relation to where there will be development occurring under the Comprehensive Plan. Staff reviewed the land use categories ,as outlined in the -Compre- hensive Plan, that surround the lakes within Maplewood. He also indicated what lakes are . presently developed. Staff indicated the classifications presented by DNR are for more a state-wide basis and do not take into account some of the provisions needed for an urban area. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that _he City _ Counci 1 appro_ve_t-be_rproposed s-boreland_or_dina.nce-a..s_.out] fined aff' s report dated October_ 7, 1982. Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes--Commi ssioners Axdahl, Barrett, El 1 efson, Fischer, Howard, Pel 1 i sh, Sl etten, Whitcomb Commissioner Fischer moved to amend the definition of structure to read, "any_thi n manufactured, constructed or erected which is normally att.ache.d_to_or_�poatii onedun 1 and, incl udrtable _structures_." Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl, Barrett, Ell efson, Fischer, Howard, Pel 1 i sh, S1 etten, Whitcomb 2 11-1-82 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: January 3, 1983 SUBJECT: Beam Avenue Reassessment The attached assessment amounts for Beam Avenue Improvements represent a determination by the courts as to benefit. It is recommended the City Council adopt the assessment roll as presented. 11�e NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY 'GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood, Kinnesota will meet in the Council Chambers in the Municipal Building, at -1380 Frost Avenue at 7:15 p.m. on January 10, 1983 to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the assessment roll for Public Improvements No. 70-5A and 71-15 Beam Avenue Improvements, to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota -Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on file in the office of the City .Cl erk. Area to be assessed: Parcel numbers --57 00310 020 32 57 00310 020 76 57 00310 260 82 57 00310 280 82 57 00210 710 50 57 00210 550 50 All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing, No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing, An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Maplewood within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. Deferment of assessments: Under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years. of age or older for whoa it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available from the City Clerk, Dated this 13th day of December, 1982 Publish: Maplewood Review December 22, 1982 December 29, 1982 BY ORDER OF THE CITY CLERK Luci E. Aurelius, City Clerk .City of Maplewood, Minnesota Parcel No. 57 00310 020 32 57 00310 260 82 57 00310 280 62 57 00210 710 50 57 00210 550 50 New Assessment 12,150.22 5,496.53 .7,259.00 24,905.75 11,962.60 1,209.76 11520.62 1,320.00 EXHIBIT "A-1" BEAM AVENUE ASSESSMENTS PROJECTS 70 -SA AND 71-15 Project D,P. No. No. Utilit 71-15 DP 1594 San. S. 714-15 DP 1594 Water 71-15 DP 1594 Storm S. 70-5A DP 1593 Storm S. 70-5A DP 1593 Storm S. 70-5A DP 1593 Storm S. 70-5A DP 1593 Storm S. New Assessment 12,150.22 5,496.53 .7,259.00 24,905.75 11,962.60 1,209.76 11520.62 1,320.00 57 -00210 110 50 71=15 71-15 70 -SA 57 00210 55050 71-15 71-15 70-5A MMIBTT "Av-1" BEAM AVENUE ASSESSMENTS PPZJECTS ' 70-5A AND 71-15 D.P. Parcel Project DP 1581 No. No. 57 00310 020 32 71-15 Street DP . 71-15 57 00310 020 76 71-15 3.581 Street DP 71-15 Street DP 1581 70-5A 57 00310 260 82 71-15 1581 Street DP 70-5A 57 00310 280 82 71-15 DP 1581 Street 70-5A 57 -00210 110 50 71=15 71-15 70 -SA 57 00210 55050 71-15 71-15 70-5A MMIBTT "Av-1" BEAM AVENUE ASSESSMENTS PPZJECTS ' 70-5A AND 71-15 D.P. New Assessment 7,205.76 7,388.49 14,594.25 5,888.97 6,341.01 18,770.02 31,000.00 17,683.44 37,405.00 67,051.04 4,602.90 9,736.30 14,339.20 2,423.59 1,124.37 8,131.42 11#679.38 2,415.32 961.00 8,103.68 11,480.00 NO* Utility DP 1581 Street DP 1581 Bridge DP 1581 Street DP 1581 Bridge DP 1564 Street DP 3.581 Street DP 1564 Street DP 1581 Street DP 1564 Street DP 1581 Street DP 1581 Bridge DP 1564 Street DP 1581 Street DP 1581 Bridge DP 1564 Street New Assessment 7,205.76 7,388.49 14,594.25 5,888.97 6,341.01 18,770.02 31,000.00 17,683.44 37,405.00 67,051.04 4,602.90 9,736.30 14,339.20 2,423.59 1,124.37 8,131.42 11#679.38 2,415.32 961.00 8,103.68 11,480.00 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment --.Special Use Permits DATE: January 3, 1983 F-3 Action by Council: Enaorsecl- hyodElfie �.._... . Rej ectcd_ _._ Date--- The city council, on September 27, requested that staff prepare an ordinance establishing criteria for the approval of special use permits. Since that time, Counci 1 member Bastian prepared a draft ordinance with suggested revisions to the entire special use permit section of the zoning code. The enclosed ordinance is based on Councilmember Bastian's proposal as well as several staff revisions. The recommendations of the Planning Commission have also been included, except for mobile homes. The Planning Commission recommends that mobile home parks continue to be allowed by special use permit in any zone in the city, until a mobile home park zone can be established (p. 1 of the ordinance), Staff would prefer to delete mobile home parks as special use permits now, because recent court decisions have made deni.al of a special use permit more difficult than denial of a zone change. Staff feels that mobile home parks should be limited to specific areas of the city. The recent approval of a special use permit for Dick Pearson's mobile home park should provide ample opportunity to locate new mobile homes in the city until a specific mobile home park zone can be developed. Continuing to allow mobile home parks by special use permit in any zone seems like an unnecessary risk. The ,main affect of the proposed ordinance changes is as follows: 1. Specific criteria for approving conditional use permits are established. 2. Obsolete language has been revised to reflect current policy and recent changes in state law. The new state law (chapter 507) makes two important changes: a. Special use permits and special exceptions are called conditional use permits and have one procedure. b. A conditional use permit can remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed. 3. Mobile home parks are deleted. This would not affect existing parks, but would prohibit future parks. 4. Several requirements have been added to "tighten up" procedures for special use permits. Recommendation _ Approval of the enclosed ordinance r. jw enclosure: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 36 RELATING TO SPECIAL USE PERMITS 17 Section 1 Section 36=6 of the . Code . of Ordinances is amended 1,5y adding the - _following -defintion: Sec. 36-6. Definitions Conditional use: A use requiring a special use or special exce tion permit, Section 2. Chapter 36,Arti cl e V of the Code of Ordinances is amended as follows (additions are underlined, deletions are crossed out) : ARTICLE V. SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Sec.: 36-436. Geeeraiiy: Purpose and definition. Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular zoning district, • due to nuisance characteristics or incompatibility with permitted uses, ma under certain circumstances be permitted. The purpose of^this article is to rovi de the ci ty wi th di screti onary power to determi ne the sui tabi 1 i t of certai n designated uses upon the communi t . A conditional use is any use requiring a special use or special exception permit. Sec. 36-437. Conditional Uses Conditional Spee4ai use permits may be issued by the city council in an zoning district for any of the following: (1) Any of the uses or purposes for which such permits are required er pern14tted by the provisions of this chapter. (2) Public utility, public service or public building uses in any district, when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare. (3) EBRiHiere4ai-exeavatieg-ef-eaturai-Fflateriais-deed-fer-beiid4ng3-eee- struetiee-ef-iandseapieg Mineral extraction in any .district. X44 -Te-elass4fy-as -a-eeRferffl4 ng- use-; -a.iiy- iRstitut4eria4 -use-ex4stfiig- 411isting-ie aey-distri et-at-the-ti*Rie-ef-the-estabiishfept-ef-sweh-di str4et: �6�-deed-Ear-�et�: 46�-the-w�ee�ieg-ef-ad�e�e�iies-�e�-t��E�s;-}ee�e_d}eg-tbe-safe-of-b�e� �- Ears. =r 1 (4) 484 To permit the location of any of the following uses in a district from which they are excluded_ by-prev4siees-ef-this-ehapter helio ort library, community center, church, hospital, any institution of any educational, philanthropic or charitable nature, cemetery, crematory, mausoleum or any other place for the disposal of the human dead. (5)_ {94 An. :f -street parking lot as a pri nci pal use i -n ae�dst Eta a commercial -or industrial zoning district. sdbjeet-te-the-prev4s4ees -� ef-sect4ee-36-22--ef-this-ehapter, _ s (6), 418) The use of portions of an business uses, such as a dairy barbershop, doctor's, dentist's apartment building for commercial or store, drugstore, beauty parlor, or lawyer's office, etc.; and similar (7). �144 AR-eff4ee-er A warehouse in an M-1 Light Manufacturing District. Eede-1966-§-914-848;-Ord:4e:-224;-§-13 -Ne:-2743-§- (8) Planned unit developments (PUD) uses. See: -36-437:--Deu64e-Dwel14Hgs-ie-F-Farm-Res4denee-94str4ets-aed-R-T-Res4deeee Distr4ets-�Sieg4e-DweTl4eg4.- Twe-fafiiy-uses-in-ae-F-Fars-Residenee-8istr4et;-div}siee-2-ef-Art4ele-11 ef-this-chapter-and-�R-aR-R-1-ResidenEe=g�str4et-�s�egle-8we4l4eg43-divisiee-3 art4ele-1I-ef-th4s-ehapter3-}eElUdieg-all -struetures-aed-Iaed-eiemeets-that meet-R-2-Res�deRee-Distf4et-�Deuble-Dwellieg�-stapdards3-way-be-perFaitted-by a-spee4ai-use-peffit-issued-by-the-e4ty-EeURe+*1--SUGh-Use--s-pet-sUbjeet te-the-review-pfe.v}ded-ie-seetiee-36-444-ef-this-art4ele:--All-p-repe.ty-eweers with4e-thfee-hbedred-fifty-X3684-feet-shall-be-eetified-ef-the-pub44e-hear�eg it,-being-the-}eteet-ef-this-preeedure-te-allew-ae-eeeasiepal-iptevspe;Fs4Rg-ef deuble-dwe44Rgs-iR-R-i-aed-Farf-Res}deRee.Distr4ets-that-are-eeesisteet-with Sec. 36-438. Planned unit devel opments--generally; definition; purpose and intent; requirements; etc. ka4-A-spee4al-ase-permit-may-be-issued-by-the-e4ty-eewRe4l-ie-aey-Use d4stf4et-ie-the-e4ty-fef-a-plaReed-de4t-deve4epRieet: W44 A "planned unit development" is a development having two (2) or more principal uses or structures on a single parcel of land of at least five acres. A PUD and may include town houses, apartment projects involving more than one building, multiuse structures, such as an apartment building with retai 1 shops at ground -floor 1 evel ,and similar projects. A PUD may not be divided unless the density distribution approved in the PUD is assured. -�e3 It is the intention of this section and the other sections of this division relating to planned unit developments to provide a means to allow — flexibility by substantial. variances from the provisions of-Ahi s chapter, including uses, setbacks, height and other regulations. Variances may be granted for planned unit developments provided that: Certain regulations contained in this chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development.,8tieh-vaf4aeees3-4f-gfafited3-sheeld-be afu44y-eees4stent- w4th- the- gene-ra4-4nteRt- and- pUfpese-e-f-this-e4apter aed-shat I - be- gra-mted- 4ft 2 (2) They would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. {44 The planned unit development would produce a urban development and aR-dfbap-epY4reRiflept of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter; � �24--The variances w4}} nature to the property - owners or occupants of :health, safety, morals would not constitute a threat of a substanzi ve values.- safety, health or genefal wel fare of adjacent or nearby land, nor b7 detrimental or. general welfare of the peopre; and {3)-The-prepesed-develepmeRt-4s-ef-sueh-a-uR4que-Rature-as-te-re u4re £ .d q eRs� erat4en-upder-eeRd4t�eRs-ef-a-plaRRed-uR4-deveTopmeet;-and the to the X44 4t-shal4-be-determ4Red-that The variances are required for reason- able able and practicable physical development, aEEerd�Rg-te-a-p�aR; and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. (O-Sweh-O aRRed-uR4t-develepRients-Riay-be-exeluded-f rem-eeFta�R- reqeq u4remeRts of-th4 s-ehapter;-prev4di Rg {4}-A-prel4m4Rary-p4aR-4R-suff�e4eRt-deta}l-te-permit-apprepr4ate-eva4uat4eR ef-the -des 49R-eeReepts-ef-the -pre pesed-prejeet-shall-be-'subm}tted-te-the p4aRR4Rg-eemFfl4 ss4eR-wh4eh-sha4I-rev4ew-the-prepesed-prejeet- and -shaP pass-a-rese4ut4eR-4Rd4eat�Rg-}ts-appreval-er-d4sappreval-ef-the-prejeet: ARy-appreva4-shaI4-be-preI44Rary-aRd- subjeet-te-further-appreval-ef-a eeRip4ete-deta44ed-p4ae-- -• ��}-A-Eemp�ete-Beta}fed-p�aR-sha��-be-s�bm�tted-te-the-p�aRR�Rg-Eemm�ss�eR shew}Rg-the-Teeat4eR-of-ell-prepesed-structures;-dr}veways;-4andseap4Rg! park4Rg;-sefeeR4Rg;-s4dewa4ks;-aeeess-dr}ves3-Iand-bses-and-aRy-ether 4nfermat}eR-requested-by- the- eemm4ss_4811. �3)-The-e4ty-eewme44-upeR-rev4ew-aed-r eeemHieRdat}eRs-ef-the-pIaRR}Rg--- eeHiMss4eR3-shall- f4Rd-that-the-prepesed-develepmeRt-4s-fully-eeRs4steRt w4th-the-purpeses-ef- th4s-ehaprter: 444 The development shall conform to the plan as filed with the city. Any s.ubstanti ve variations from the plan shall require recommendation by the planning commission and approval by the city council after apublic hearing Se�.- for -&nrro�ta+ The -ewRer-of-aRy-tract-ef-laud-eenta0R�Rg-i }ve-�6}-er-mere-acres-4R-any . mse- d4str4et-4R-the-e4ty-may-apply- te-the-e�ty-eewHe4lfer-deVelepment-of-sa4d- �traet-as-a-p4aRRed-uRot-deve4epfeRt;-as-def4Red-4R-seet*eR-36-438-of-th4s v}s eR:--BuEh-appI4eat4eR-shal4-be-made-te-the-clerk-upeR-thi-ferms-suppled �y-h4ni-i-4R-the-nuffibef-ef-eep4es-requ4red-and-ean- be-FRade-by-th�-4.and-ewRer-e; by--aR-ept4eR-he4der;-if-a4l-eweers-ef-the-4and-s4gR-the-appT4C4t4eR---The-fee-te aeeempapy-such-app14eat}en-shaI4-be-4mpes'ed3-seta-estab14shed-and-foxed-by- the E��y-EeuRE��3-by-rese�ut�eR3-fres-time-fie-time:-�8rd:-P18--843§-8�§-9��:9�8-��A ; } 3 See:-36-448:--SaRie--preeedure: dpeR-reee4pt-ef-an-app44 eat4an-fer-develepflieRt-ef-a-tract-as-a- pl aRRed uR4t-deve4epHieht;-as-prev4ded-4R-seet4eR-36-439-ef-this -d4v4s4eR3-the-e4erk sha413-w4th4R-feurteeR-J144-days-forward-eep4es-thereef-te-the-pl-ahR4R9 ee 4ss4eR-and-te-the-eebRe44 --The-EeuRe44-sha4l-set-a-hear4R E[-date-wh4eh-w�h4 aIhew-the-p4aRR4Rg-eeHif4ss'e'-suff4e4eRt-t4fiie-fer- study- and-eefereRees-w4th .the-deve4eper-aed-aRy-ether- perseRs-4t-des4 res-te-eeRsu4.t. --Thi-GeuRe44-may- et-at-aRy-t4FRe-after-4t-reee4ves-the-eeRffiss4eRers' -re ert3-w�AEh-sha44-be Riade-by- the- p4aRR4Rg-eeRiF.ss}eR-Ret-Hiere-thaR-sixty-�69 -day s-after-the-date- the-6erk-deo}vers-a-eepy-ef-the-app4 4eat�eR-te-the-eemFR4ss4eR3-wR4ess-the-t4ie .is-exteRded-by-the-EewRe44:--WeariRgs-shall -be -bel-d-4e-the -same -maARer-as-Prev4ded- fer-ethef-spee4al-use-perHi4ts:-�8rd: -We: -3243-§-2�§-911--81e-X11)3-9-7-67� Sec. 36-441- 439. Outlots (a) No building permit w441 shall be issued for construction upon any lot in the City designated as an outlot upon any plat, except by spee4a4 conditional use permit. • (b) The city council w414 shall not grant a spee4al- conditional use permit . for building. upon any outlot, unless said outlot meets the following conditons: (1) It meets the minimum size and frontage requirements provided for in this chapter. (2) It is ready for development and has the requisite public improvements. (3) The permitted density under this Code has not been transferred to another parcel and is therefore, sufficient to accommodate the proposed con- struction. (4) The outlot is not used for permanent common open space. (5) The proposed construction can overcome or accommodate topographical - problems and peculiar site characteristics. (Ord. No. 481, § 1 (� 1'005.030)9 2-21-80) Sec. 36-442. 440.. _Appl i cati on. Abstraeter-s-Eerti f *Fate-, ' fee3-ete. Appl i cation for the-}ssuaRee- a spee4a4 conditional use permit shall be made 4R-wr4t4Rg to the e4ty-elerk director of commune yHevelopment upon the form supplied by the -City, SDeci fi c awl i cation requirements shall be as stated on this form. and-referred-by-the-e4erk-te-the-e4ty-eeuRe4I The-app44eat4eR sha44-be-aeeeFflpaR'4ed-by-an-abstraeter ` s-Eertff4eate-shew}Rg-the-Rafes-ef-ewRers ef-p-reperty-4eeated-wi*th4R- the- e4ty-94tuatee-w4th}R-twe-huRdred-X2094-feet-ef ige-beuRdary- I 4Res-ef- the-prepe;rty-upeR-wh4 eh -a -spee ial - use- pef%.4t- is -requested%.4t-is-requested. The applicant sbal l al so,at the time of filing such application; pay a fee to 4 to the e4ty-eler director of community level omment to defray the-expense-ef adveft4s4ng;-publ4e-hear4iig-aed-ether administrative expenses incurred bthe d y city i n the handling of sweh the applications cats on, which fee shall be 4mpesed3 -set, established aed-fimed by the city council, by reselwt4en Ordinance from time to time. �Gede-1965T-§-9117G29� The apll_i cation shall be considered as being official 1 - sut5i tted when it meets the requi remen s o e i rec or' o community eve opmen . Section 36-44-3-. 441.. Publie-hear4ng; pet4ee-by--publ4eat.iee-aed-13y-F.ia*I Procedure After an application has been submitted, the director of communi t develop-. ment shall re are a report and recommendation and submit it to the 1 a nn * n commission for a recommendation to the city council. The lannin commission's � g - recommendation and staff report shall then be forwarded to the city council for a public hearing . The City Council shall hold at least one publ i c hearing on each application for a spee4al- conditional use permit after a notice of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper at least ten *(10) days before said hearing. The city council shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property located within the city within 350 twe-huedred- 2894 feet of the boundary lines of the property upon which such use has been requested, which notices are to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least f4ve-(54- ten days before the date of the hearing (Code 1965., 9 911.030) Sec, 36-44-x#-. 442 Granting; vote of ._council ; condi ti ons; automa ti c peri od'i c review; new conditions upon review. .(a) After -the- pub I4e-hearieg-previded-fer-ie-seetiee-36-443-ef-th}s-divisiep, The city council may grant the -speeial-use -0erm�t-requested a conditional use permit by a majority vote_ ef-its-wefbers: (b) Approval of a conditional use permit shall be based upon the following findings: (1) The use is in conformity with the City ` s Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. (2) The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. (3) The use shall be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 14) The use shall not depreciate property values. (5) The use shall_ not be hazardous, detrimental or di sturbi nq. -to present and potential surroundin land uses, due to noises, lar smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water of l ution, vibration, general unsi hU,i ness, electrical interference or other nuisances, 5 The use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access parking ss or arkin needs that will cause inconvenience to the adjoi n.i ng propert` (7) The use shall be served by essential_public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8 The use shall not . create excessive additional re ui rem4nts at public cost for public faci 1. i ties and services; and shall not !)e detrimental - to the economic welfare of the city. 0) The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's important natural and scenic features into the development design (10) The use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects. ' l l The Cit Counci l may_wai ve any_of the above requi rements fora ubl i c building or utility structure, provided the council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between political subdivisions of the state would be best served by such waiver. (c)�b4 The city council, in granting a spee4a4 conditional use permit, may attach to the permit such conditions and guarantees as may be necessary for to the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. the-pdb44E;-the f4 ghts-ef-ethers-and-the- e4ty. (d) The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one ear of council approval or the eri{ii t shall become null and void. The council may runt an extension of the permit if Just cause is shown. This requirement shall not appl.y to PUDs with an approved hasi n l an. Such extension shall be requested in writing and filed with the director of community devel o ment at least thirty days before the ex i rati on of the original conditional use permit. There shad be no charge for filing such petition. Only one extension mV be granted and that extension shall be for an additional six months. The request for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attem t to complete or utilize the use permitted in the conditional use ermi t. The petit -ion shall be resented to the planninq commission for a recommendation and to the.citycouncil for a decision. (e) �0 All spee4a4 condi.ti onal use permits which do not have a specified indefinite_ approval, a specific termination date or provision 'for a periodic review, shall be reviewed within one year of the date of passage -of -the eeeRE4l-Rieasure-graRt4Rg-such-spee4a}-use-peri}t council approval and every five (5) years thereafter. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed u on are observed, but nothin in this section shall prevent the city from enacti_ng or amending official controls to chane the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets thea reed upon conditions and is later disallowed because of the cot = ena.c i ng or amending official controls shall be considered a 1 e al noncon ormi riy use. (f) The -council may, upon such review, determine that np .conditions shall be imposed or that the permit may be terminated if the -approved conditions have been violated or the use is no longer_ in effect, apd-tbat; i f-reaseRable-ander-the-EIrEbHistaRees--a-terFfl4Rat4eR-date-fer-said-speElal- use-pemlt-Riay-be-estab44shed;-and-further-that-where-the-use-sheeld-Ret 6 4Rvelve-the-eenstruet4eR-ef-aRy-spee4al-be}ld4Rg-er-strueture-a-f-a-%Retary . va�be-�R-exEess-ef-five-theesand-�e��a�s-��53888.-893-that-thc-spee�a�-bse peri}t-fay-be-tern iRated:- 12){e3 In the event the Council wishes in its review process decides to con- sider on- sider imposing additional eew conditions or termination of a speeial conditional use permit, --the city council shall hold at 'least one publ i (:- hearing on that spee4al-wse permit after a notice of the hearing has been-publ i shed in the official newspaper at -least ten (10) days before said hearing. The council shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property 4eeated-w4tMn-the-e4ty within twe-huRdred-2004 350 feet of the boundary lines of the property upon which such use has been established, which notices are to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least f4re-454 ten days before the date of the hearing (Code 1965, 911.040, 911.050; Ord, No. 4179 § 19 5-12-77) h Whenever an application for a conditional use permit has been considered and denied b the city council, a similar a l i cati on affecting substantial l the same property shall not be considered a ain by the city for at least one ear from the date of its denial, unless the council directs such reconsideration by at least four votes. Sec. 36-44-&.443 Speeial Conditional uses to conform to terms and conditions attached to granti n� of spee4al-ese permit. Any use permitted under the terms of any spee4al conditional use permit shall be established and conducted in conformity to with the terms of sweh the permit and of any conditions designated in connection therewith. (Cede- Any change involving structural alteration, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar chane not specifically permi tted by the conditional use permit issued shall require an amended permi t and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were bein issued. All uses existinq at the time of ado tion of this ordinance and .y.. vi r ue thereofgran _e * a, con° l ziona use perm1 '!; a e conred as having a conditional use p permit which contains conditions which permit the land use and structures as they existed on said date and -any enl ar ement, structural alteration, or intensification of use shall require an amended conditional use permit as provided for above, Sec, 36-44&.444. Records The director of community development shall maintain a record of all conditional use permits issued, including information on the use, location, conditions imposed b the council, time 1 i mi is review dates and other information as may be appropri ate, Sec. 36-444r". 445 Filing of hermit rr `1 A certified copy of any conditional use permit shall be filed with the count t-ecorder or registrar of titles. The conditional use permit sfal.l include the legal description of the property included, Section 36- 446-----36-460. Reserved. 7 4 Section 3. This ordinance sha.l l take effect after its adoption and publication. Adopted by the Maplewood City Council this day of 1982. Attest: City Clerk mayor --. s Ayes -- Nays -- a A. Code amendment-- Special Use Permits , Secretary Olson said the Planning Commissionrevi oust ' • P y reviewed w � e ed the s item • . It i s to establish specific criteria for special useP ermi ts. G The Commission discussed theoss' p ible establishment �f a moble home _ _ zoning district. -to provide for the parks. They su este' the el. imi nat . _99 � � on of mobile home parks from the special use permit not be done until they are provided for. 19 Commissioner Fischer moved that number .4 be added to the ordinance ermittin mobile home arks by conditional useermits Commissioner Ell efson seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl Barrett, Ell efson, Fischer, He jny, Howard, Pel l i sh, Prew, Whitcomb The Commission discussed the definition of PUD and possibly establishing shi n y 9 a PUD zoning district. They also reviewed the application aPP1 i cati on Procedures andd the criteria for approval of a permit. •• The Commission suggested the following owi n changes 99 g rages to the proposed ordinance:.. Page 4, Sec -.'35-440, line 3, eliminate "by him" . , Page 5, Sec. 36-442 (b) (1) , line 1, eliminate "Update" Page 5, Sec. 36-440, last paragraph, "The application shall be considered as being officially submitted when it meets the requirements of the Director of Community Development," Page 52 Section 36-442 (b) (3), line 2, .eliminate "existing or intended". • Page 6, Section 36-442 (d), line 8, change "shall" to "may". Page 7, Section 36-442 (h), line 4, change "renewal" to "reconsideration" Commissioner Whitcomb movEd the P1 anni_ng__Corini ss i on forward the ro osed ordinance amendment � -� - ___._._P _ .P to �r,E city_council 1 _ for approval_ as amended by the Commission. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl Barrett Ell efson, Fischer, He jny, Howard, Pel l i sh, Prew, Whitcomb MEMORANDUM TO:Cit Manager . y.Act cb-,7- FROM: Director of _Community Development 4 SUBJECT: .Community Development Block Gra(CDDDGEn�e�: DATE: January Grant j .�.-�.�.r�.-�....� nuary 3, 1983 Y! C) CDBG Program _... The CDBG program is a federal .grant program to benefit low and moderate .income persons, prevent ore ate threat eliminate nate slums and bl ht or • to health or welfare. Projects, g � al alleviate ate a facilities or .must relate. to housi npublic economic development, g Larger cit1es, such as St. Paul and Minneapolis, automati cal ly recei ve aspecific amount of this money 'Sma11er cities, such as Maplewood, mustcompete for the money left over. ProPosed Grant Staff is recommendingtwo art of a - part project. One part would a f P unpaid assessments for low and mod p y or all or public improvement erate � ncome property owners for projects ordered after March 1 19 would be a housing program, ram. 78 • The other part Assessment Subsidy Program There are twelve city projects that would be eligible. The B at t1 e Cr eekProJect �s also eligible. The Frost Avenue improvement project, betweenBirm1ngham Street and White gear Avenue, would be eligible ifordered by the before February 1. In order to qualifas a low or moderateincome family, the foil y eg maximum requirements must be met: Family Size: 1 2 Family Inco 3 4 5 6 Y me: $16,104 $18,374 $209645 $22,968 $24,394 $253,819 $27,298 $28,723 Staff has sent a questionnaire e to assessed property owners to det ' many people qualify. erm� ne how Housing Program This program would consist of three parts 1. Rehabi 1 i to ti onrants t 9 o moderate income owner -occupied. e p d home owners. 2. Grants to rehabilitate- rental buildings di ngs wi th low a . nd moderate income tenants. 3. A fund to acquire and demolish mol�sh a home that is beyond re ' then be sold for reuse. y pair. The lot would Recommendation Authorize Staff to prepare a a r grant application based on the above r • pp oval of the appl i cats on to be considered on JP oposal , w� th January 24. mb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand--Associate Planner -= SUBJECT: Zone Change (BC to. R-1) and Lot Area/Width=Variance LOCATION: 'English Street APPLI CANT/ OWNER: Ralph Nuebel - Action by Cou c it : -DATE: December 16, 1982 SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Ee j e c c ..��....... Request DOA. G e-�----.--........ 1. Approval of a zone change from BC, Business Commercial to R-1, Residence District (Single Dwelling). 2. Approval of lot width and lot area variances. Proposal 1. The applicant i s oroposi ng to build a single dwelling. 2. In addition to the zone change, -the following variances are needed to make the lot buildable: Lot Width Variance - . a. Lot Wi d,th--60 feet b. Code Requirement --75 feet of lot width at the thirty-foot setback line. c. Variance Needed --fifteen feet Lot Area Variance - a. Lot Area --9,300 square feet . b. Code Requirement --10,000 square feet c. Variance Needed --700 square feet . CONCLUSION Ls s ues Ttaff does not see any reason to deny the proposal . The site wetil d be compatible 'with the substandard residentially developed lot to the north and would meet -development goals of the Land Use Plan for this area. Recommendation I. Approval of the enclosed resolution rezoning the subject site from BC to R-1. Approval is based on the findings that: 1. R-1 zoning would be consistent with the Land Use Plan s** cesingle- r family dwellings on small lots are permitted. = - _ .2.- A -si ngl a dwelling would be consistent with the adjacent -development along English Street. 3. Density requirements,, as listed i n the Land Use *,P1 an would not be exceeded, II. Approval of the enclosed resolution granting a lot width and area variance on the basi s that: 1. There is a hardship since the property could not be put to reasonable use if the code requirements were strictly enforced. - 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. The city has approved comparable lot width and area variances in the past. MM J BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot dimensions: 60 by 1.55 feet 2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped -Surrounding-Land Uses flortherly and Southerly: Single dwellings Westerly: English Street and single dwellings Easterly: A metal pole buil. ding used for the storage of James Sabota s landscaping equipment n....& a_.L!_— - 6-71-79: Council approved a lot width and area variance for a 60 by 135 foot parcel on West Kenwood Drive. -12-6-79: Council approved a lot area variance for a 9,920 square footP arcel on Birmingham Street, south of Summer Avenue. 10-25-82: Council approved a lot width variance of five feet and an area variance of 550 square feet for a parcel on Lark Avenue. z DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS Planning 1.. Land Use Plan Designation: Rm, Medium Density Residential. This classification is designated for such housing types as single-family houses on small lots, two-family homes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The maximum population density is 22 people per net acre. 2. Zoning: BC 3. Section 36-485 of the Zoning Ordinance states that "in any instance where the city council or the planning commission is required to consider an exception or change in this chapter, including the zoning map, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the council or planning commission shall, among other things: a. Assure itself that the proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. b. Determine that the proposed change will not substanti a . injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the characer of the neigh- .borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. c. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interests and con- veniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. _ 3 _ d. Consider the effect of the proposed change upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. e. Be guided in its study,, review and recommendation by -s6und standards of subdivision practice where applicable. f. Impose such -condi tions,. i n addition to those -required,--as are necessary to - assure that the intent of this chapter is complied with, which conditions may . i ncl ude, but not be 1 imi ted to, =harmonious design of buildings, plant- ing lanting and its maintenance a sight or sound screen, the minimizing of noxious, offensive or hazardous elements, and adequate standards of parking and sanitation. 4. Statutory requirements State .law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under con- ditions on- ditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Public Works Sanitary sewer and water are available. mb Enclosures 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Petitions 4_ Zone Change Resolution 5. Variance Resolution r =W .001 N KONLMIAN AVE. ir 0 UN -Ty ROAD "c" Y r J H J t W - W so d t9 V V W. Z t cr V h Q DEMONT C ROOK AVE [.2' m QiSEX T JRJ AV GERVAIS AVE. G ANDVIEW AV � 36 VIKINGoa. z --i � SNERREN AVE F to OPE AYE. i � LARK rAvE� a� + ' 5 J LARK AVE Vim: T RD LAURIE R0. = aOr LAt ILELANn]� ,0 ZS = A a _, < J = o JUN TION [AVE. Q CSC U RKE AVE �- ou KE E ELDRIDG J AVE. O rL�ON T W �cotAVE. N 64 s s V'c mSKI LWA N m AVE. = NA RIS 'c aYAx W R. R. 2 f fie 28 FROST v 00 IL r 27 F F WON AVE. i � ag 3 0 < FRISSIE AVE. Q�. Lake ? 50 PM IA AVE h Pholen z i -� Z W 62 � ' 1L �" WLJA tpt NT 30 Q4g ROS =WO R Y Ad. Q � AVE ~ N t►' h as h su m R A-� W 4 W' Q � i o W Wakefield O ,� Z cr SOP AVE r` Lok e = PRI E A GJ AVE. F1 F1 n rl C r --- ST. t LOCATION MAP' r. 10 20 21 Jam, t .• It 14_�- Ile r r 8 --l0- 1 kr M 3 -- , evKC wa v' 20 21 -•r- - t 19 ` . I •♦fit t SSS �. 1 4 a e ' + � rt i R 1n v' g cc •r 15 e% LL) -, 2 2 co 1 21 6 N4A KI A C, j- 1 19 r %- 50 rr 4 a 9 �b - 47 - °� •i %lam 14 it J �,.,,,� �,,,,� {-•�. .S • •• Ic 1 414-1. '� t� 41 ! 7 1 9 Ag, ;�� 1`t•� t8 b 1 19PC ? C. ca 1 jg -' 0' 4 = rim�.j t1 12 w . ---own dom.n. da ac . ! •-4 Co `o t 83.1G' 15' 10n fvp 1:0 lb ' •.. 1 J •�9.:,c: SABOTA LANDSCAPING dD EQUIPMENT STORAGE ♦ r . S S 2t t � t 7 Ya • 1 C3 1 � . t OitG v� Ev , •i/�� 1 1 l ftooft 0 S,O ...1.�I. ..Leo 5AMR 14 fu /7 . U fj _ a PROPERTY LINE MAP. With Zoning r =:,tiff Ralph . Nuebel Property ADJOINING PROPERTY OW 1 REZONE PETITION " ( PETITION--y.�l.{,J a sa, 17, VM Fit 0% We, the undersigned property owners collectively r<Cpresent 50% or more of the adjoining .property owners within .200 f eet sof the reques ed rezone proper _ cribed on the attached -application in accordance with Section 915`.010�of the .Maplewood Municipal. Code. We7 petition the . Maplewood City Council for a change in official zoning classif icat on�. the attached described property fromzoning to t zoning, Our names can be verified, as legal constituted land owners, on the certified abstract (listing owners of land within 350 feet of the requested rezone area) which is requir( to be filed in conjunction with the rezone application and this petition. The written signature of any person's name on this petition is indication of that person's understandinp of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorse- ment for approval -of -such change. SIGNATURE ' I r PRINT NAME j,_l r � ► l• /,00't r AO L � j r o Fes• r . '.J E� i f•/ .r r� /r 0.0 i ZLI / ro i I xz- .47 ABSTRACT CERT LIST N0. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER REZONE PETITION ( PETITION r�� ( We, the undersigned property owners collectively represent 50% or more of the adjoining property owners within '200 feet of the requested rezone property described on the attached application in accordance with Section 915.010 -gf the Maplewood Municipal Code. a We Tetition the Maplewood City Council for a . change in of f icial zoning classif icati; on --!.the attached described property from , 1�,•��/�;; �dt,;1.,�,� „�r zoning to : ; - ,�---•,;, zoning, Our names can be verified, as legal constituted land owners, on the certified abstract (listing owners of land within 350 feet of the requested rezone area) which is require to be f sled in conjunction with the rezone application and this petition, The written signature of any person's name on this petition is indication of. that person's understandin�� of the proposed zone, the proposed location and an endorse- ment for approval -of such change, _ SIGNATURE ) V11) i r r . (.10VV l PRINT NAME Ir r LY_ ABSTRACT CERT. LIST NO, 17k 4 .f i� 1 � L RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVAL OF A ZONE=CHANGE WHEREAS, a rezoning. procedure has been initiated by Ralph - Nuebel for a zone _change from BC, Busi ness .Commercial , to R-1, Resi dence Di stri ct (Si ngl a Dwe11 i ng) for the following -described property: Lot Three and the South half of Lot Two, Block One, Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Such above property being located on the east side of English Street, south of Ski l lmn Avenue, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning procedure is as follows: 1. That a rezoning procedure has been initiated by Ralph Nuebel , pursuant to Chapter 36 of the Maplewood Code; 2. That sa-i d rezoning procedure was referred to and reviewed by the Mapl e - wood City Planning Commission on the 20th day of December, 1982, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezone procedure be approved; 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the 40 rezoning procedure, notice 'thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That all persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and/or present written statements, and the Council considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above-described rezoning be granted on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. R-1 zoning would be consistent with the Land Use Plan since single- family dwellings on small lots are permitted. 2. A single dwelling would be consistent with the adjacent development along English Street. 3. Density requirements as listed in the Land Use Plan would not be exceeded. Adopted this day of 19 �. s . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE WHEREAS, a variance request has been initiated by Ralph Nuebel for a fifteen -foot lot width variance and a 700 square foot lot area=v_ari ance for the -following-described property: Lot three and the south half of Lot two, Block one, Gladstone Ramsey County, Minnesota. Such above property being located on the east side of English Street, south of Skillman Avenue, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota: WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance request is as follows: 1. That a variance request has been initiated by Ralph Nuebel, pursuant to Chapter 36 of the Maplewood Code and Section 462.357 (g) of State Statute. 2. That said variance request was referred to and reviewed by the Maple- wood City Planning Commission on the 20th day of December, 1982, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the variance request, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That all persons present at said hearing were given an" opportunity to be heard and/or present written statements, and the Council cons i-dered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the above-described variance be granted on the basis of the following findings of fact: I. There is a hardship since the property could not be put to reasonable use if the code requirements were strictly enforced. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. The city has approved comparable lot width and area variances in the past. Approval of this variance is subject to the City Council rezoning the above- d'escri bed property to a zoning which would allow single dwel l i rigs . Adopted this day of 198.71 ATTEST: ' City Clerk Mayor 11 s -�_ B. Rezoning -and Variances --English Street(Nuebel) r Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting approval of a zone change to R-1, and approval of lot width and lot area variances. Staff is recommending approval of both requests. The applicant was not present Commissioner Fischer moved the P1 anni ng_Commi ssion recommend to the_ City. Council approval of the resolution rezoning the subject .site from BC to R -1.. -._Approval is based on the f i.ndi ngs that: 1. R-1 zoning would be consistent with the Land Use Plan since single- family ingle- family dwellings on small lots are permitted. 2. A single dwelling would be consistent with the adjacent development along English Street. 3. Density requirements as listed i n the Land Use Plan would not be exeeded. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, 'Whitcomb- Commissioner hitcomb- Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of w the _ resolution g_ranti ng_ a l of width_ and area a . variance on the basis that: 1. There is a hardship since the property could not be put to reasonable use if the code requirements were strictly enforced. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. The city has approved comparable lot width and area variances in the past. Commissioner Hejny seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El 1 efson, Fischer, Hejny, Howard, Pel l.i sh, Prew, Whitcomb =� S MEMORANDUM Action by Couno.1.1: Endors ^ d__,._..a_.�._..._ TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: January 3, 1983 SUBJECT: Frost Avenue, Birmingham to White Bear Avenue This item was tabled December 16, 1982 so the full Council could consider the matter. No new information was requested at that time. If the City Council does wish to proceed with the project it is recommended that staff be authorized to execute the attached agreements with the County. The financing for road and storm sewer construction would be through assess- ments, while the "Opti com" would be financed by the State -Aid Street Account. 0 J 47123, Frost Avenue, S.A.P. 62-628-03 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT by and between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the County of Ramsey, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the -1-county"; Im- WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the City desire to construct and rebuild Frost Avenue 21 (County State Aid Highway 28) from Birmingham to White Bear Avenue; and WHEREAS, this portion of Frost Avenue has been designated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs from the county state aid highway funds; and WHEREAS, this portion of Frost Avenue reconstruction has been designated as project S.A.P. 62-628-03; and WHEREAS, plans for Frost Avenue Project S.A.P. 62-628-03 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the improvement of County State Aid Highway 28 within the limits of the City as a county state aid highway project have been presented to the City; and WHEREAS, the project includes, in addition to other things, grading, concrete curb and gutters, storm sewer, detached bituminous paths and City utility adjustments and/or improvements; and WHEREAS, the grading provisions require acquisition of certain right of way and temporary construction and slope easements prior to the construction; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has determined allowable credit for storm sewer outfall lines previously constructed prior to the project, and the resulting portion of this storm sewer system eligible for county state aid highway funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The County shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications and proposals, take bids, and with concurrence of the City, award a contract for the construction of this project, S.A.P. 62-628-03; the County shall perform the construction inspection. 2. All Frost Avenue rights of way . and temporary easements will be in the name of the County, and parking and other regulations will be controlled by the County. Any rights of way which cannot be negotiated will bye acquired through eminent domain Proceedings and thereafter assigned by the City to the County. 3. The City shall pay for all rights of way and easements required for the construction of the project within the City except those on County -owned property. Page 1 of 3 4. The storm sewer system within the right of way and County park as shown in theP lans and specifications is estimated to be eligible for 75% reimbursement by county state aid highway funds based on outfall credits and this portion shall be paid by the County, except that system extended beyond the right-of-way line north of Station 54 for which the County shall pay 0%. 5. The City shall pay for that portion of the storm sewer system within the ' ht of way and Count ark not eligible for reimbursement from county state aid rig y Y P � highway funds. The portion of the storm sewer cost to be paid by the City is estimated af, 25% except that stem extended beyond the right-of-way line north of Station 54 � P system for which the City shall pay 100%. 6. Upon completion of the project the County shall own and maintain the storm sewer catch basins and leads and the City shall own and maintain the storm sewer trunk lines and laterals servicing property outside the road right of way within the City. 7. The .City shall pay to the County 75% of the cost of concrete curb and gutters constructed within the City except for medians, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutters and the portion on the south side of Frost Avenue along Wakefield Park between Hazelwood and Prosperity and on the east side of White Bear Avenue adjacent to County -owned property. 8. The City shall not assess or otherwise recover any portion of its costs for this project through levy on County -owned property. 9. The County shall pay for the detached bituminous path construction and upon completion the City and County shall jointly inspect the path and the City shall approve, b letter, the construction in conformance with the plans and specifications. PP • ' � �responsibilityhe Cit shall own maintain The City will then assume for the paths and t y , and operate the paths. 10. Any existing City utilities modified or adjusted which are necessitated by the construction, as shown in the plans and specifications, shall be paid for by the County through its county state aid highways funds. 11. Any City utility or facility improvements to those provisions presently made in theP fans and specifications may be incorporated in the construction contract bysupplemental agreement and shall be paid for as specified in the supplemental agree ment. 12. The City shall pay 5% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the contract as awarded, to the County as a preliminary engineering fee. This fee shall be due upon award of the construction contract. 13. The City shall pay 5% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the final contract amounts, to the County as a construction engineering fee. This � fee shall be due upon notification to the City of the final amounts paid to the contractor. Page 2of3 G 14. The County prepare shall are the partial payment estimates, approved by the P project construction engineer, and notify the City of its share of the costs for the City's items of work. The City shall pay its share of the cost to the Treasurer of Ramsey Y Count within fourteen calendar days, and the contractor shall then be paid by the County. ha a to the Count all additional remaining costs for its _ 15. The City shall pay y - share of the work upon notification by the County of the final amounts paid to the contractor. lfi. Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and specifications are hereby in all things approved. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY _ By _ BY Chau man Its Board of County Commissioners By _ Attest Chief Clerk -County Board Its Date Date Approved as to Form: Assistant County Attorney Revised 12/17/82 Page 3 of 3 AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS AND EVP SYSTEM WHITE BEAR AVENUE AND FROST AVENUE THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the . State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is considered mutually desirable to provide traffic control signals with street lights and provide w g emergency vehicle pre-emption system, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System," on White Bear Avenue (County State Aid Highway No. 65) at Frost Avenue (County State Aid Highway No. 28); and WHEREAS, the EVP System is for the sole use and benefit of the City; and WHEREAS, the County and City will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of said traffic control signals with streets lights and EVP System as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The County shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications and proposals and shall perform the engineering and inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute "Engineering _.and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service pole or pad shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. The County shall install or cause the installation of traffic control signals with street lights in accordance with State Aid Project No. 62-665-22 on White Bear Avenue at Frost Avenue at its own expense. 4. The County shall install or cause the installation of an EVP System in accordance with said project at the City's own expense. Estimated cost is $2,000.00. 5. The City has or will install vehicle emitter units on City emergency vehicles to pre-empt the EVP System; the emitters shall be at the sole expense of the City. 6. The County shall install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply 1 to the service pole including any necessary extensions of power lines. Upon completion of the signal and EVP System installations, necessary :electrical power for. their operation shall be at the sole expense of the County. In ---accordance with s Page 1 of 3 the Policy Lighting hting County Roadways, County Board Resolution 78-1394, the. County g shall pay energy costs of the integral street lighting. 7. Upon completion of the project, the County shall maintain and keep in repair the traffic signal and street lighting, including relamping, cleaning and painting at its expense. The County shall maintain and keep in repair the EVP System, and xp _ the City shall reimburse the County for the actual cost thereof. 8. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the County, thFe City shall advance to the County an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of its share of the cost based on the actual bid price plus six percent (6%) of such amount for the City's share of the cost for engineering and inspection. 9. Upon completion of the work provided for herein, the City shall pay the County the balance of its share of the actual construction cost plus six percent (6%) of such amount for the City's share of the cost for engineering and inspection. The County shallpay any remaining costs. 10. The County shall submit an invoice to the City annually, listing all labor, equipment and materials used to maintain the EVP System. Labor costs and equipment costs will be at the established rates paid by the County at the time the work is performed, and material costs will be invoiced at the actual cost thereof to the County. - TwentYfive percent (25%) of these costs will be added to the invoice, to cover the County's cost for supervision and administration, in accordance with the policy for Traffic Control Signal Systems, County Board Resolution 81-1001. The City shall promptly pay the County the full amount due. 11. Upon written request by the County Engineer, the City shall maintain a log g showin the date, time and type of emergency for which the EVP System was actuated. These logs shall be made available to the County. Malfunction of the system shall be reported to the County immediately. 12. All timing and related adjustments of the traffic control signals shall be determined b the County through its Traffic Engineer, and no changes shall be made Y to these adjustments without the approval of the County* 13. Except for the negligent acts of the County, its agents and employees, the City shall assume all liability for, and save the County, its agents and employees, harmless from any and all claims for damages, actions or causes of action arising out of the continuing uses by the City including but not limited to the operation, use and existence of the equipment for the EVP System. 14. Any and all persons engaged in the maintenance work to be performed by the Count shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that Y et of this State on behalf of those may arise under .the Worker's Compensation A employees so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of—any act or omission on the part of those employees so engaged on any of the work eonte m lated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. P t Page 2 of 3 C IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their signatures. InF resence of: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA By • Its By �• Its Date THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY By Robert J. Orth, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Approved as to Form: Attest: Harry E. Marshall Chief Clerk -County Board Assistant County Attorney Date Page 3of3 A • MEMORANDUM TO:, City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: SP P P Special Exception-.Home ti on--Home Occu ati on Action bar Coun. -i is LOCATION: 1904 Maryknoll Avenue _ r APPLI CANT: Kathleen A man En�:,rs.,d p Irio d r i ed- OWNERS: John and Kathleen Apman DATE.: December 15, 1982 Re j eeed. Date SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSAL Request The applI cant is requesting approval to operate a beauty shop in the basement . of 1904 Maryknoll Avenue. Proposed Use 1. Refer to the enclosed letter. 2. The shop would cover 268 square feet of the basement. 3. The basement is a walk -out with a separate exit from the upper level. 4. The house has a double -wide driveway and garage for parking. 5. The maximum number of vehicles during shop hours would be the resident's vehicle, the operator's vehicle and a customer's vehicle. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the enclosed resolution approving a beauty shop at 1904 Maryknoll Avenue, on the basis that it meets all, city code requirements. Approval is subject to the installation of one, five -pound -ABC fire extinguisher in the lower level. BACKGROUND Site Description A single dwelling in a single dwelling neighborhood. Past Actions - V1- 1-17-80; 1-17-80: The city. approved a home beauty shop at 2648 Fifth Avenue, subject z to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide off-street parking spaces as follows: 2 for' the single family dwelling, 1 for each shop chair in use and 1 for an outside employee (if applicable). This condition shall be met prior to the permit becoming effective; 2. The permit shall become effective only after the City certifies compli- ance ompli- ance with all Code requirements; 3. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be employed; 4. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises , 'or other visible evidence of the conduct of such home occupation other than one sign, not exceeding two square feet in area, non -illuminated, and mounted flat against the wall of the principal building; 5. Operation to be limited to one chair; 6. No expansion shall occur without approval of the City Council; 7. The permit is subject to revocation by the City Council upon violation of the above conditions. 4-5-79: The city approved a home barber shop at 2620 Keller Parkway. 4-6-78: The city approved a home barber shop at 1900 Sterling Street, DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS P1 anni ng 1. Zoning: R-1, Residence (Single Dwelling) 2. Section 36-66 (4)(6) of the Code of Ordinances states the following: Home occupations requiring a permit shall be subject to, but not limited to, the following requirements: i. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be allowed to en age in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than 20% of each level of the dwel i.i ng unit floor area shall be used i.n the conduct of a home occupation. 2 3. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building or premises, that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the require- ments of the city sign code. 4. Limited retail- sales o f . products produced off-site- may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity (i es) of the home occupation. z 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation .i n greater volumes than would normally be expected in a resi- dential esi- dential neighborhood. The need for off-street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces. for home occupation at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equip- ment or process shall be used which creates visual or audible interference in any radio or television 'receivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 7. No fire, safety or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal • combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, amuni ti on manufacturing or other objectionable 'uses as deter- mined by the City. Machine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than 120 volts of current. 9. Any violation of.these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. The City may waive any of these requirements if the home occupa- tion is located at least 350 feet from an adjoining residential use. 11. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of Section 826 of the City licensing code. Public Safety j The basement door must remain to meet a code requirement. Citizen Comments All of the surrounding neighbors have signed a petition in far►oor of the beauty shop. (See enclosed petition.) 3 ADMINISTRATIVE Procedure 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. City Council decision jw Enclosures location map property line map applicant's letter petition resolution 4 Jb 36FDR-E ,w, U VIK I ��s�1` SHERREN AVE H SER EN AVE. OPE AVE COPE AVE. LARK AvE. LARKAVE. LARK AVE. t - J � a H z Q RLJAURIE R0. z oar LAURIE RD (z O,G _ W aC 251AVE..�� 4N ® z D 65 JUM TION AVEJ Z�� ~ "g" °C Y 64 Q AVE 8U KE 1Z A U RKE - JI N t- ELDRIDG AVE. B `- � �� . bAP awdoo R- �,� • PUBLIC WORKS R . pN w SELMON T a AVE. W 64 > BLDG. _ v M AVE. SKILLIKA m = HAR RIS 0 J o[ VI w W Q ROS WOOD AVE. p RYA1A Q 5YdAN AVE 4 , R. Q �� o 29 FRO T v vs ~ � 0-: Z8 7t rON AVE.et d: SU R 4 ► of 49W r FRiSSIE AVE. z p 0 w5 ¢ : R I PLEY AVE. Z Wok a fi a /d 30 PH IA AVE �? i = I-- ' N T AVE =1 CokeIc s - 29 = r-- � SOP 41'c > Q = Z o z z 3 Z J [PRICE =AVE W 49 z PRI E AV GJv a > NiL ♦, L Alft�p NT AV 30r] FI[I C� 1@7 e -r n A I I I 65 9 _. LOC*ATION NEAP i IL 1p AL mw: ICA • +� o` �• co tn ow or � /44� `"D z Coo � 1, Ln+ � �♦fit t riy 1 C�C� t C --1 �► �'► }_=+�. IQC 4►' C: :C DC 00, 14 S i 1 •- � �j 9l - w - ` - rr +^ or K ` r w ter. .� �. �. �� v►�s ar• �r �� w .� r = L ! 7 �� .�. ��i w • C r � 'sc , ,.� _ ,,....;;; r 1� 1 q� �: : ,yam �.,.� „�, :►. OF J�A ol •, tr_ r, L J mac. l__ A � � Y .�•�� , r 4 � � r / 1 — { _• `T 4t • T / � a 1r 1 fa o PROPERTY LINE MAP APPLICANTS LETTER OCTOBER 26 1982 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A BEAUTY SHOP TO BE PUT IN THE BASEMENTF 0 MY HOME. THIS HAS BEEN .SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE WANTED TO DO FOR OUR ' DAUGHTER FOR YEARS. DO TO THE ECONOMY WE FEEL THAT THIS WOULD BE A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR HER TO * HAVE HER OWN BUSINESS. THE LOCATION BEING OFF OF FROST AVE. IS CONVENIENT FOR HER CLIENTS. NOW SHE IS PRESENTLY EMPLOYED IN N0, ST. PAUL, THE EQUIPMENT -THAT WOULD BE USED WILL BE HA i R DRYERS TWO. SHAMPOO ' BOAS AND TWO STATIONS WITH MIRRORS. THER WILL BE ONE EMPLOYEE . TAe J THE MAIN HOURS WILL BE 9AM TO 5PM MONDAY THUR FRIDAY AND SOME NIGHTS UNT I LL 7PM. SATURDAY HOURS WILL BE 8AM TO IPM. THE SUPP I ES WILL BE PICKED UP BY HER SO THERE WILL BE NO DELIVERIES. 1 rl WE THE UNDERSIGNED NEIGHBORS OF JOHN AND KATHLEEN APMAN HAVE -NO OBJECTIONS TO GWENDOLYN LORRA I NE APMAN�`HOMPSON T. PUTTING A BEAUTY SHOP IN THE BASEMENT OF 1904 Mi RYKNOLL THE APMAN RESIDENCE, z RESOLUTION NO. COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT T WHEREAS, a special exception permit request has been i ni-ti ated by Kathleen Apman to operate a home beauty shop for the following described property: Lot 3, block 1 Maryknol 1 Addition, except the north 88-9/10 feet Such above property being also known and numbered as 1904 Maryknol 1 Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota: WHEREAS, the procedural history of this special exception permit request is as follows: 1. That a special exception permit request has. been initiated pursuant to the requirements of section 36-66 of the Maplewood Zoning Code; 2. That said special exception permit request was referred to and reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on the 20th day of December, 1982, at which time said Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said special exception permit be approved; 3. That the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider the special use request, notice thereof having been published and mailed pursuant to law; and 4. That the Council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. DY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL, that the above-described special exception be granted on the basis of the following finding of fact: the beauty shop would meet all city code requirements. Approval is subject to the installation of one five -pound ABC fire extinguisher. Adopted this day of 19 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 0 A. Special Exception --1904 Maryknoll (Apman) - Secretary Olson said the appl i cant is requesting approval to operate a beauty shop in the basement of 1904 Maryknol l Avenue. Staff is recommending approval of the request as outlined in their report. The applicant was present and indicated she had nothing to add to the report. Mr. Apman indicated there is parking space for about 8 off-street spaces. Commissioner Prew moxed the._.l_anni ng Commission recommend to the - City Counci he_CityCounci l- _a.pprov.al -of the_ resol_u_ti on approvi ng_ a_ beauty shop at 1904 Maryknol l Avenue, __on_the_ ba s i s_ th_ at _i t_meets_al 1_ city code requi rements . Approval _i s subject_ to the installation _of one, five - pound ABC ive- poundABC Fire Extinguisher in the lower level . Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes --Commissioners Axdahl , Barrett, El l efson, Fischer, He j ny, Howard, Pel 1 i sh, Prew, Whitcomb. r '3 MEMORANDUM Action by Cf 1 • TO: City Manager E n a o r Se FROM: Associate Planner --Johnson _; moai- �cd—.--- SUBJECT: Time .Extension = --Re • ec Loa ___ LOCATION: Beam Avenue - u - Da.to�a,�.._._ APPLICANT: Voya Piletich 4 -OWE RS: Antler Corporation, Dusan Pi l eti ch, Voya and Vera Pi l eti ch - , PRWJECT: Beam Lakeside Addition DATE: December 30, 1982 Request _ Approval of a one-year time extension for the Beam Lakeside Addition preliminary plat. CONCLUSION Analysis Preliminary plat approval was granted to the applicant in December 1981. Council must honor preliminary plat approvals for one year. Once the one year expires, as in this case, Council is under no obligation to honor the preliminary approval. This request should be denied because the proposed plat is inconsistent with the updated subdivision requirements. The applicant also has made no progess in satisfying the requirements of preliminary plat approval. Recommendation Approval of the enclosed resolution, denying a time extension for the Beam Lakeside preliminary plat, on the basis that: 1. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the subdivision regulations adopted after preliminary approval was granted, which require water lines to be connected to a municipal system. 2. During the past year, the applicant has made no progress in satisfying the conditions of preliminary plat approval, particularly with regard to site grading. 3. Since substantial physical activity or investment have not occurred in reasonable compliance with the conditions of preliminary approval, the applicant will not suffer a substantial financial damage if a new - application is required. • BACKGROUND Plat Description 1. See map two 2. Net acreage: 33.3 — Past Actions = 12--17-81: - Council approved the Beam Lakeside preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building permits only to be issued in Area I and in Area I, deed restrictive covenants be included so buyer is aware -they will have to connect to city water when it becomes available. The restrictive covenants be reviewed and approved by staff. 2. No bui 1 di ng shal 1 be permi tted on remai ni ng areas of the pl at unti 1 _ such time- as city water is available. 3. Suitable documentation from property owners be presented, granting the developer the right to grade the adjoining property. 4. A final grading, drainage, and utility plan be approved by the City Engineer. 5. A developer agreement be entered into to provide all internal plat improve- ments, including water lines in the streets. 6. Grading around the existing dike be completed, maintaining past drai nage patterns.. 7. Payment of the deferred assessment and interest. 8. Filing of a deed combining a residual 25 foot strip at Beam Avenue and the east line of the plat, with the lot at 1185 Beam Avenue. 9. Deeding of Outlot A to the City. 10. Beam Avenue should be paid for by the developer and relocated within the plat or Council must order Beam Avenue as a public improvement project. 11. Submission of an erosion control plan, considering the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. 12. Grading of the entire site to grades approved by the City Engineer before .final plat approval'. No material may be removed until the entire site is -graded. This requirement may be waived by the Director of Public Works engineering data shows excess material on the site. Z 13. The phasing plan shall be revised to include the extension of Adele Street to the north .property line with phase II. Additional phases �MUst be approved by staff. Council also reduced Area I (Map two) from 21 to 13 lots. Council adopted, later in the agenda, an updated subdivision ordinance which requires water lines to be connected.to the municipal system. 2 DEPARTMENT CONSIDERATIONS a Planninq 1. Section 1005 (e) of the Subdivision Code adopted on December 17, 1981 (not included in the recodification) states that: - "For one . year following preliminary approval and for two (2YYears fol 1 owi ng fi nal approval , unless -the subdi vi der .and the city agree otherwise, no amend- ment to a Comprehensive Plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use,- Bevel opment dens ty, lot size, lot layout or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regul ati ons , the city may extend the period by agreement with the sub- divider ub- divider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and require- ments, or it may require submission of a new application, unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application". 2. Section 1012 (c) of the Subdivision Code adopted on December 17, 1981, states that: "Water and sanitary sewer lines must be connected to the municipal system. In the absence -of city water and sanitary sewer lines servicing. the applicant's property, the applicant may make special provisions with the city to extend such lines from existing mains." 3. Shorel and Management regulations --the preliminary plat is consistent with the proposed shorel and ordinance requirements for lot area, except for lot one, block three. This lot is classified as a water -frontage lot and is to be at least 20,000 square feet in area. As proposed, it is approximately 17,825 square feet in area. Public Works No progess has been made to satisfy the condition for grading of the entire site, as a precondition of moving toward final platting. Other Agencies On September 10, 1982, the Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District suspended its grading permit for the site, due to noncompliance with permit conditions. ic enclosures: 1. -.,,.Location Map - 2. -Beam Lakeside Addition Phasing Plan Map 3. Resolution 3 • T is VADNAIS HEIGHTS I 0 60 22 4, 0 -rvols .eke Q. 23 ...PALM CT db 22 EAU KON"m on L a A e 10 AVE. 0 0 KOHLMAN AVE. ROAD Z bU GERVAI . 3 AVE. 36 left -Am % SHERREN AVE COPE AVE. Kener 0- n LARK AVE. ~ LARK aVE ~ LARK]E— Loke LAURIE j RD. -QVNTY 40 [LAU RD 0 w- ---- --- - z ar 1 7 Q - 49 C�V Cc LELAND 25 newz SAND2 z 25 AVEA JUI!CCTION JEE. L 0 1. 4 -, SURKE v.at AVE. U RKE BU KE Ayf ElE AV. ELDRIDS AVE. ELMOKT w BELMON AVE. 44. > CA 49 linRes LLMAN ISKILL MA AVE. WAR 41 COUNTY ROAD TBONRZZW -34 3 T29NRZZW z lu n DEMONT AVE- t�RQQK AVE .2 • w EXT INT Ay SE EXT - : 17 C1 j - z G �JLNDVIEW FAVE, IVIKIPJC; )LDR. MAP I LOCATION MAP Sao I, 7 \V . to Vx C 114 .4 eJ7 !, 1p Ify— ?, 2L FA Zr IL IL Jr I rc '00! co IL 1 1-1 13 % V 'j3 + 00, '00P. / 41 .o v V A UZI .09 Cb % I 101) 4L .0000or dP 0 Jw 14 IO < 04P \ % 7- .. . .... . - . W. F-1 • e7. 4? 16 V/ r ow. 4.0 0 L BEAM LAKESIDE ADDITION Preliminary approval for PHASING PLAN buildable lots relying on private wells (see L 12-17-81 Council action) r (Note: Note for recording) RESOLUTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF .FACT AND DENIAL OF -A-w. TIME EXTENSION FOR PRELIMINARY PLATTING�� a6 - i WHEREAS, a one-year time extension has been requested by Voya Pi 1 eti ch for the Beam Lakeside preliminary plat,,. for the following described property: The SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 and the West 180 feet- of the South 350 feet of the SE 1/4 -of the NE 1/4, all in Section 4, Township 29N, Range 22W, except the East 175 feet of the South 183 feet thereof, subject to easement of record, containing 40,86 acres WHEREAS, the procedural history pertaining to this request is as follows: 1. On December 17, 1981, Council conditionally granted approval of the Beam Lakeside Addition preliminary plat as proposed; 2. On December 17, 1981, following approval of said preliminary plat, Council adopted a revised subdivision ordinance; 3. *A requirement of said subdivision ordinance is that waterlines must be connected to municipal systems; and 4. The applicant requested a time extension for said preliminary plat on December 6, 1982, pursuant to the requirements of Section 1005 (e) of the subdivision code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA that the requested time extension of the Beam Lakeside preliminary plat approval be denied and a new application be required on the basis of the following findings of fact: i . Said preliminary plat would be inconsistent with subdivision regulations adopted after preliminary plat approval was granted, 'which require water lines to be connected to municipal systems; 2. During the past year the applicant has made no progress in the form of substantial physical activity or investment in reasonable compliance with the conditions of preliminary plat approval ; 3.. Since no substantial physical activity o� investment have occurred, the applicant will not suffer a substantial financial damage if a new application is required. Adopted this day of 1983. Attest: City Clerk Mayor MEMORANDUM TO:. City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Commission Chairman DATE: December 27, 1982 0,rw JCM. Action. by c07 _Iny Endorscd Modi. Pei ected Date Section 25-.20 of the Code of Ordinances states that "The chairman of the pl anni'ng commission shall be designated by the city council at the first meeting in January of each year from among the members of the planning commission." Les Axdahl has been the chairman since November 11, 1972. He is interested in reappoi ntment.- The other members of the commission are as follows: Duane Prew Paul El 1 efson Richard Barrett Dorothy Hejny Lorraine Fischer William Howard (resignation pending ) Ed Kishel Joe Pellish Dave Whitcomb Ralph Sletten MEMORANDUM tion by O TO: City Manager ; .�,�-. �.,.� FROM: Al 1 Department Heads RE: Travel and Trai ni nq Reimbursement Policy DATE: January 3 1483 i - PROPOSAL It is proposed that the current reimbursement oolicy for out-of-state conferences be revised to provide that the employee Day 15t of the total costs for attending the conference. BACKGROUND On October 8, 1981, the Council adopted the policy that for out-of-state con- ferences the City would pay 100% of the registration fee, E7% of the airfare and $50 toward lodging and food. Prior to that date, the City paid 100% of these costs with some conditions (e.q., coach rate for airfare, $20 maximum per day for meals). The revised policy regarding a $50 maximum for lodging and food regardless of the conference length is not equitable as the percentaqe reimbursement of costs decreases as the length of the conference increases. Thus, an employee attending a one -day conference receives a greater percentage reimbursement than an employee attendinq a four-day conference. Another problem is that the lodginq rate for conference hotels usually exceeds $60 per night. Also, conference registration fees . often cover a varying number of meals. Amore equitable policy for out-of-state conferences would Drovide that the employee pay 15% of the total eligible costs for attending the conference. Eligible costs would include the registration fee, coach rate for airfare, lodging costs (up to the single room rate at the conference hotel) and up to $20 Der day for meals. This policy would ensure that all employees would Day thesane percentaqe of total conference costs. This reimbursement policy.is sti1 ll less than most other cities, which provide lnn% reimbursement of confer- ence costs. The proposed policy will not increase the expenditures for travel and training as deoartment heads will have to keep these expenditures within the budgeted amount. Also, the Council should note that City Manager approval is required for all travel and training. RECOWENDATI ON Ii is recommended that the reimbursement policy for out-of-state conferences ide that the loyee pay 15% of the total el �qIble costs for be revised to prow em P attending the conference. DFF:inb Action by Council: w K3 d, Iflc ...�...__ , MEMORANDUM Rejec e� ....�.�a.ar....._.. - To: Barry Evans, City Manager f.,010 From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Services Date : January 3. 1983 _Subj Park Availability Charge On Commercial and Industrial Property - Code Sec. 21-66 The Maplewood Park and Recreati on Commission discussed the Commercial and Industrial Charges for Neighborhood . Parks at their December 13, 1982, meeting. Last year the City Council increased the commercial and industrial property fee from 3-1/2% market value to 5% with a $12,000 per acre maximum. It is the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation that for 1983 the City Council approve an increase to 6/ of market value on commercial and industrial property in the City of Maplewood. Enc. (1) M MEMORANDUM To: Park and Recreation Commission ssion Members From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community S ervi ces Date: December 8, 1982 Subj . Park Availability Change on Commercial and Industrial. Property -Code Sec., 21-66 Please find enclosed a copy of Maplewood Code Sec. 21-66 which was passed by the City Council on July 22, 1976. You will note that this ordinance does not require an annual resolution stat- ing sta t ing charges for commercial. and industrial ndustrial property as does the ordinance for park acquisition and costs development paid d by .residentialp developers. In contacting other communities as to their industrial property charges, two phrases are expressed Assessed Valuation; Market Value. Assessed valuation of land is' the value established by the Tax ,Assessor's Department. Over the past few ears valuation • y aluat�on has increased, but it is still less than the full value of the property. Market value of the property i s the value that has — been established by appraisals or by negotiation between the owner and the City Coun- cil. Where appraisers have been required to establish sh the market value, e, the costs have been assumed by the developer. (See Sec 70210. o f the Maplewood Code The communities of New Brighton, Brooklyn Center Ros i HorthAcquisition-and � ev 11 a and S .y. St. Paul do not have Park Acquisition and Development Ordi- nances because the w p y were sufficiently built t up at the time that this. method of funding park acquisition and development was .started. It was reasoned .that it was not fair to new industries coming into the communityto have to g pay for local parks when previously estab- lished industries did not have to contribute. The following information was compiled In December 1982 by personal phone calls to communities that have Park Availabilit h Availability Charges rges on commercial and industrial property: 1Plymouth - 10% of assessed valuation or 10%" Oro of land - not to exceed $2200/acre 2 Cottage Grove - 10% of undeveloped land ifark is needed ' p eded �n area 3) Shoreview - 10% of fair market value 4) Maple Grove - 5% of gross ss land area or an equal amount �• n cash (This is basically 5% of fair market value 5) Brooklyn Park - 10% of assessed value of land ' d - maximum of $109000 6) Mounds View - 10% of assessed value of land j 7) Oakdale - 10% of land area or equivalent cash 8) Woodbury - 10% of fair market value of land not to exceed $120.0 industrial, $1500 commercial and $1800 office 9) Eden Prairie - 10% of land or cash in lieu .10) Maplewood - 5% of market value in cash or in land- area From the gathered information,. it would appear that the majority of communities are now charging 10% of either -.the fair market value or 10% of the assessed value. Enc. (1) I Action by Council: O:r. 6> Endorsed—.---- -MEMORANDUM ndorsed—.MEMORANDUM Msd.i. _1 ec_�..�_�..�...� Rei e c To: Barry Evans, City Manager Dat- From: a+From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Community Services Date: January 3, 1983 Subj : Park Acqui si tion Charge For Neighborhood Parks The Maplewood Park and Recreation Commission at its Decem- ber 13, 1982, meeting discussed the Park Acquisition Charge For Neighborhood Parks and made the following recommendation: It is recommended that the Maplewood City Council increase the average acquisition cost to $4,775 and the average acre development cost be continued at $7,,500,., whi ch ' wi 1 l establish a new price of $85.25 per person. The attached memorandum dated December 8, 1982, to the Park and Recreation Commission further explains information for the Park Acquisition Charge, the 1982 survey of other municipalities having PAC charges, the method of establishing the Park Acqui- sition cqui- sition Charge for Neighborhood Parks, and a Resolution for passage by the City Council. Enc. (2) MEMORANDUM To: Park and Recreation Commission Members From: Robert D, Odegard, Director of Community Services Date: December .8, 1982 Y v ces Subj: Park Acquisition Charge for Neighborhood Parks Maplewood Code Sec. 21-46 outlines the need for neighborhood arks and ''Council9 orhood . P the intention of the City to developand ,implement a park -open s P p pace .acquisition and development policy which assigns a function of neighborhood ark acquisition me P and ,development nt responsibility to all housing dwelling units." Section 21-56 (a) states: "The City Council� at. its first regu- lar lar meeting of each calendar year, shall act to adopt b e acre y reso- lution, the avera g c e acquisition cost and the average acre development cost for neighborhood parks throughout the ' g e City. In 1982 the City Council established the acquisition si ti on q cost per acre for neighborhood parks at $4,200, which was an increase from $49000 established In 1974, and the development P costs were continued from the 1974 amount of $79500. When the new figures were inserted in the formula as explained a i ned i n Maplewood P Code Sec. 21-47, the average cost per acre per person was$79,50. In . Sec. 21-48, the population per dwelling unit table is estab- lished and � g tab us ng the $79.50 per person per acre, the cost of a single family detached dwelling is $326.00 which must be paid at the time a building permit is issued. The cost of raw land in Maplewood over thea st seven hl appreciated P years has highly Y Pp eci ated but conservative value on one acre would be $7,000. If we were to increase our development per - o P costs to $15,000 p acre with the City assuming 50/ of the cost of development, P ' the formula would indicate cate that the cost per person per acre would be increased to $145.00 and the cost for a single family detached$594.,50,g ly dwelling would be survey in December 1982 of other suburban communities that have Acquisition tion Char es indicates cat Park � es that Maplewood has been falling behind. However, the main concern in calculating or costs f acquisi- tion - tion of park property is the raw land and this will varyi n cost from community y to community. To expect PAC charges to be increased from$326.00 to• $594.00 for a single residence is not realistic. It does however, indi- cate ver, �ndi- tate that there is a need to consistently update costs to stay relevant. with the present economy. 041. It is my recommendation that the Par • Park and Recreation Commission on consider recommending that the average acquisition acre 9 q cost be increased to $49775 and the average acre development - tin$795009 g pent cost be con- tinued at which will establish a new rice of$85.25 r P per person. per acre or $349.53 per single family detached dwelling, Enc. (2) ` December 1952 MUNICIPALITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT North St. Paul None New Brighton None Brooklyn Center None Roseville None Maplewood $326per lot Shoreview 0-2 units acre - ' / 3� of fair • market value of undeveloped land 2.1 - 3 units/acre - 4% 3..1 - 4 units/acre- 5% 4.1 - 5 units/acre . - 6% 5.1 - Over This fee usually comes to be around $300-$400 per single family lot Little Canada $300per lot $100 per apartment unit Cottage Grove $275 per single e fami 1 9 y Mounds View 0-2 units/acre no $100per acre 2.1 - 3 units/acre - $150 3.1 - 4 units/acre - $200 4.1 - 5 units/acre - $250 5 -Over units/acre- 10% of assessed value of land Oakdale Woodbury Eden Prairie Plymouth Maple Grove White Bear Twp, Apple Valley Burnsville Stillwater $275 per unit or 5% land dedication $22.0 per unit or 17X high density $400 per single family lot $200 per apartment unit Multi -family lot - based on density 10% of land or cash in lieu $390/per lot & Outlot 0-5 units/acre - 7h% fair market value 5-8 units/acre - 10% fair market value $150/lot or option of 10% of fair market value 10% on resident value & 5% ponding not to exceed 12% 10% of land area or cash based on value 10% market value of land w s December 1982 How To. Cal cul a to Park Acquisition Charges for Neighborhood P 9 9 arks (5-15 Acres in Size) f (Cost of 1 Acre + 1/2 Cost of Development) p ent) 100 People Cost per Person of Raw Land Per Acre t` Cost of development i said b(1/2)P y City and developer (1/2) Development includes such items as:la equipment, p ydiamonds, backstops, tennis courts, hard surface area, hockey rink, parking lot, small building, -Presently: Cost of 1 Acre 1 Acre People/Acre ($4,200 + $7,500 } 100 = $79.50 50/person/acre /p on/acre 2 Real Costs in 1983: ($7,000 + $15,000 ) -= 100 = $145.00/person/acre 2 Request for 1983: ($4,775 + $7,500 ) — 100 = 2 $85.25/person/acre What will be the costs to a builder? Persons/Unit Pre sently($79.50) 1983($85.25) Single Family Detached Dwelling 4.1 326.00 349.53 Mobile Home 2.5 198.75 213.13 Efficiency Dwelling 1 Bedroom 1.1 87.45 93.78 3 Bedroom 3.3 262.35 281.33 Townhouse 1 Bedroom 2 159.00 170.50 3 Bedroom 4 318.00 341.00 e fA RESOLUTION FOR PARK ACQUISITION CHARGE FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WHEREAS Maplewood Code Sec. 21-46 recognizes the need for neigh- borhood parks, establishes standards and .improvement guidelines fo.r such and provides methods of acquisition and development, and WHEREAS Sec. 21-56 (a) states that the City Council at its first regular meeting of each calendar year shall act to adopt by reso- lution eso- 1ution the average ' acre acquisition cost and the average acre de- velopment cost for neighborhood parks throughout the city, and WHEREAS the intention of the Ordinance is to provide for future quality of life through the acquisition and development of park - open space, and WHEREAS the costs of acquisition of property and the development of parks has continued to increase, therefore The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that effective January 10, 1983, the City Council establish the averaae acre acquisition cost at $4,775, and continues the. development cost at $7,500 per acre, with the City financing 50/ of the develop- ment costs. SEY 0 COUNTY LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Action by Ngor7i e.1 Dc.4-e January 3, 1982 CAPITOL COUNTY OF MINNESOTA T0: Members of the Ramsey County League of Local Governments Arden Hills Gem Lake FROM** Ellen A. Longfellow, Coordinator Little Canada The Executive Board of the RCLLG has decided to maintain the level of Maplewood dues that was charged in 1982 for 1983. Mounds View Enclosed is your invoice for the amount that your city owes for 1983. New Brighton The dues should be paid by February, 1983. We appreciate your North oaks consideration of this matter. N. St. Paul The League appreciates any comments and suggestions from its members for Ramsey County meeting subjects and issues of concern to its members. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Roseville St. Paul Shoreview Vadnais Heights EAL:rmm White Bear Lake Enc. White Bear Township RAMSEY 0 COUNTY LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CAPITOL COUNTY OF MINNESOTA Arden Hills Gem Lake Little Canada Maplewood Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks N. St. Paul Ramsey County Roseville St. Paul Shoreview Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Township December 30, 1982 City of Maplewood c/o Barry Evans City Manager 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 1983 RCLLG Membership Dues - $1,250.00 T ITITT^ T riIn Please submit payment of 1983 membership dues. attention to this matter. Sincerely, J4v Ellen A. Longfellow RCLLG Coordinator EAL : rmm Thank you for your