Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987 12-14 City Council Packet
AGENDA MOLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday, December 14, 1987 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 87 - 27 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1, Minutes of Meeting No. 87 - 18 (September 14, 1987) 2. Minutes of Meeting No. 87 - 19 (September 28, 1987) 3. Minutes of Special Meeting, Parkside Fire Station (October 19, 1987) (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. Approval of Plan Document for Self Insurance Dental Plan 3. Budget Transfer - Finance Dept. and City Manager's Office 4. Elimination of Special Assessment Fund for Public Improvement Projects 5. Custody Services Agreement for Investments 6. Ordinance to Increase Hydrant Charge Rates (1st Reading) 7. Acorn Greenhouses Assessment Cancellation Project 86 -03 8. Fish Creek - Carver Avenue Stormwater Pond - Feasibility Study 9. Hillwood Drive, City Project 86 -05 - Reduction of Retainage 10. Highwood Addition, City Project 86 -11 - Final Acceptance (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1, 7 :00 P.M., Cottages of Maplewood (Woodlynn Avenue) PUD Reduced Parking Curbing Variance Setback Variance (west-lot line) Setback Variance (south lot line) Tax - Exempt Financing Tax - Increment Financing 2. 7 :10 P.M., On -Sale Liquor Licenses: Days Inn, 1780 E. County Road D Chesters, 3088 White Bear Avenue 3. 7 :20 P.M., Code Amendment: Metal Storage Buildings (2nd Reading - 4 votes) (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Hardship Ordinance (2nd Reading) 2. Code Amendment: Townhouses (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment: BC (M) District - Pumps (1st Reading) 2. Beam Avenue Watermain, City Project 84 -12 - Change Order #2 3. Beam Avenue Watermain, City Project 84 -12 - Change Order #3 4. Appointment - School Boundary Criteria committee 5. Policy on Alcohol /Drug Abuse, A.I.D.S. and Sexual Harassment 6. White Bear Avenue /11th Avenue Redevelopment 7. North /Tartan Band Boosters 8. Council /Staff Workshop �J) VISIT'OR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 14, 1987 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 87 - 18 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amend 1. Visitor Presentation 2. Larger Lots 3. Composting Hours 4. Add I -11, Recognition Dinner 5. Development Committees 6. Receptionist 7. License Department 8. Survey Lots 9. Manager Evaluation 10. Board of Water Commissioners 11. Senior Citizen Advisory Committee 12. Delete I -7 13. Request to Install Utilities before preliminary plat approval. I -12 14. Approval of Plans and Specifications - Mailand Road, I -13 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Greavu 1. Accounts Payable. the Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses check register dated August 26 thru September 02, 1987 - $479,003.16 : Part II - Payroll dated 9 -4 -87, gross amount of $140,726.42) as recommended. 9/14 2. Gloster Fence Approved the expenditure of $1500.00 for a chain link fence for Gloster Park with funds provided through the Commercial PAC charge. 3. Furniture Bids Approved the purchase of the following described furniture as authorized based on low bidder: Council Chairs Manager Desk, Seating, Etc. Reception Area Police Chairs Park & Recreation chair Division 01 $6,611.00 Division 02 4,756.49 Division 02 450.44 Division 46 807.00 Division 61 413.00 4. Time Extension : N.E. Metro Area Approved a five -year extension for the conditional use permit issued to the Northeast Metro Alano to hold meetings at 1955 Prosperity Road. 5. Tax - Exempt Financing : Beaver Creek Apartments (Final Approval) Resolution 87 - 9 - 164 RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING AUTHORIZATION OF A PROJECT AND HOUSING PROGRAM UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C (MUNICIPAL HOUSING PROGRAMS) AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGEE REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND BONDS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED TO FINA -NCE THE PROJECT AND PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council has previously received a proposal from Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Company ") that the City undertake to finance a certain Project and multi- family rental housing program for such Project as herein described, pur- suant to Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes (the "Act ") and on December 27, 1985, authorized such project and program and issued its $8,500,000 Variable Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership Project) (the "1985 Bonds "), to finance such Project. The Project consists of the acquisition and con- struction of a multi - family rental facility containing 180 units and related improvements including parking facilities in the City. 2. The company now desires to refund the 1985 Bonds through the issuance by the City of its $8,500,000 Multifamily Mortgage Refunding Bonds, Series 1987 (Beaver Creek Apartments Project). The Project as - 2 - 9/14 described above will facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportuni- ties for residents of the City, encourage the development of housing faci- lities designed for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income and assist such persons in obtaining decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they can afford; encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and will otherwise further the policies and purposes of the Act; and the findings made in the Preliminary Resolution adopted by this Council on February 11, 1985, with respect to the Project and in the final authorizing resolution for the 1985 Bonds on Decem- ber 23, 1985, are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of Sep- tember 1, 1987, between the City as Lender and the Company as Borrower (the "Loan Agreement "), the City loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to refund the 1985 Bonds. The Basic Payments to be made by the Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its rights to the Basic Payments and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee ") as security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of September 1, 1987 (the "Inden- ture") between the City and the Trustee. The acquisition, construction, operation and occupancy of the Project will conform to the terms and condi- tions of a Regulatory Agreement (the "Regulatory Agreement ") dated as of December 1, 1985, and amended and restated as of September 1, 1987, between the City, the Company and the Trustee and a Declaration of Restrictive Cove- nants dated as of December 27, 1985, and amended and restated as of Septem- ber 1, 1987 (the "Declaration "), both executed by the Company and to be re- corded as a covenant and restriction running with the land on which the Project is located. 4. The Council, by action taken on February 11, 1985, and after a public hearing thereon, adopted a resolution giving preliminary approval to a proposal to finance a project substantially the same as the Project; and on or about December 19, 1985, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency gave approval to the proposed financing program for the Project. This Council, by action taken on December 23, 1985, adopted a resolution authorizing the Project and the issuance of the 1985 Bonds. 5. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds, forms of the following documents have been submitted to the Council for approval: (a) The Loan Agreement. (b) The Indenture. (c) The Regulatory Agreement. (d) The Declaration (not executed by the City). 6. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) The Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred to above constitutes a Project authorized by the Act and the financing program for the Project is authorized by the Act; - 3 - 9/14 (b) The purpose of the Project and the effect thereof will be, the acquisition, construction a lities for assisting persons of City to obtain decent, safe and afford; and the program for the Project is, to promote the public welfare by id equipping of rental housing faci— low and moderate income within the sanitary housing at rentals they can (c) The acquisition, construction and installation of the Project, the issuance and sale of the bonds, the execution and delivery by the City of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Regulatory Agreement (collectively the "Agreements "), and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City con— tained in the Agreements, and of all other acts and things required under the constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and City Charter to make the Agreements valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act; (d) It is desirable that the Company be authorized, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement and Declaration, which terms and conditions the City determines to be necessary, desir— able and proper, to acquire and install the Project by such means as shall be available to the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, subject to the terms of the aforesaid agreements; (e) It is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture; (f) The Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to pro— duce revenue sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, interest on, and the purchase price of, the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory Agreement also provide that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, in— cluding, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory Agreement; (g) As provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the reve— nues pleged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of the Bonds or the interest or premium, if any, thereon, or the purchase price thereof, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Inden— ture; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the — 4 — 9/14 Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that the Bonds are issued without moral obligation on the part of the state or its political subdivisions, and that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof and that the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; and (h) A public hearing on the Project was duly held by the City Council on February 11, 1985. 6. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the provisions of Section 9 of this Resolution, the forms of the Agreements and exhibits thereto are approved substantially in the form submitted and on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Agreements, in substantially the form submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Clerk. Any other documents and certificates contemplated by the Agreements or necessary to the transaction described above shall be executed by the appropriate City officers. Copies of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein described shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in said Loan Agree- ment and Indenture. 7. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and this Resolution. The Bonds shall mature and be subject to mandatory purchase as set forth in the Indenture. The principal amount of the bonds and the rate of interest on the Bonds shall be such rate or rates as the Mayor, the City Clerk, the Bond Purchaser and the Company shall agree to, but not to exceed 9.5% per annum. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated, the original Bond Purchaser, shall purchase the Bonds for an amount not less than 95% of the principal amount of the Bonds and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into the bond Purchase Agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to prepare and exe- cute the bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the bond Purchaser. 8. The Mayor and City Clerk and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Bond Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be re- quired to show the facts relating to the legality of the bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 9. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be - 5 - 9/14 necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the City officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said City Attorney and City officials are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence (or inability) of the officials authorized herein to execute any of the documents herein referred to, the documents may be executed by any officer or member of the City acting in their behalf. 6. Time Extension: Miggler Addition Approved a one -year time extension for the Miggler Addition preliminary plat subject to amending the September 22, 1986, conditions of approval as follows: 1. Submittal of a 66- foot -wide right -of -way easement to the City Engineer for the extension of proposed Miggler Drive to Gervais Avenue. The applicant shall pay all costs for acquring this ease- ment, including any costs for acquisition by condemnation. This easement shall not encroach upon the City's property abutting to the east. 2. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with requirdd.;surety for required public improvements, including the construction of the street and water main extension to Gervais Avenue and to guarantee removal of the truck farm structures that are in conflict with ordi- nance requirements based on plat lines. 3. The water main to be constructed in proposed Miggler Drive shall be looped to the water main in Gervais Avenue. 4. Delete Lot Two, Block Two and renumber Lots Three through Five to Lots Two through Four. Lot One, Block Two shall be enlarged to include the west 185# feet of the former Lot Two. The former Lot Three shall be enlarged to include the easterly 115± feet of the former Lot Two. 5. Phasing of the plat may be permitted provided: a. Development is limited to Lots One, Two and Three of Blocks One and Lots One and Two of Block Two (as revised in condition four) until street and water main are extended to Gervais Avenue. The area not being developed in the first phase shall be shown as an outlot. b. A developer's agreement shall be submitted with the required surety for all public improvements needed to serve the first phase and to guarantee the removal of any truck farm structures in violation of setback requirements. This agreement shall include the submission of a temporary 108 -foot diameter cul -de -sac ease- ment to the City and construction of a 100 -foot diameter temporary cul -de -sac. The bulb of the cul -de -sac shall be constructed to the east line of Lot Two, (as revvsed in condition four), Block Two. - 6 - 9/14 c. Fire flows in proposed Miggler Drive must meet the fire code. 6. Miggler Drive shall be a 66- foot -wide right -of -way. 7. "Miggler Drive" shall be renamed "Brooks Avenue." 8. City Engineer approval of final grading, drainage and utility plans. 7. Increase: 1988 Ambulance Rates, Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 165 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the length of time services are provided between arrival at the scene and arrival at the hospital or clinic. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective January 1, 1988: CHARGE LENGTH OF TIME S RENDERED $ 174 Over 50 minutes $ 116 31 - 50 minutes $ 58 11 - 30 minutes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge for services rendered when the length of services is 10 minutes or less, when the patient is not transported, or when the patient is transported to the detoxification center. 8. Increase: 1988 License /Permit Fees and Services Charges Approved the following 1988 fee schedule: Proposed 1987 1988 Fee Fee Amusement Park License $118 $123 Bench Permit: First Bench 36 38 Each Additional Bench 21 22 Bingo License: For One Night /Wk, for 52 Wks. 118 123 For Two Nights /Wk, for 52 Wks. 237 248 One Night 15 15 Christmas Tree Sales: Regular 113 118 Non - Profit Organization 88 92 - 7 - 9/14 Cigarettes & Tobacco 31 32 Coin - Operated Amusement Devices: Per Location 118 123 Per Machine 31 32 Dog Kennels: First time 31 32 Renewal 15 16 Gambling License 118 123 Gambling Investigation & Administration Fee 250* 250* Golf Course 119 124 Motels: 1 - 15 Units 48 50 16 - 35 Units 75 78 36 - 100 Units 117 122 Over 100 144 150 Restaurant and /or Bakery: Food Establishment 129 135 Catering Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 67 70 Each Additional 31 32 Fleet License 180 188 Itinerant Food Establishment: (Limit 7 days) First Day 31 32 Each Additional Day 16 17 Non - Perishable Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 30 31 Each Additional 21 22 Fleet License 82 86 Potentially Hazardous Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 93 97 Each Additional 46 48 Fleet License 268 280 Special Food Handling Establishment 46 48 Tavern License 237 248 Taxicab License: Base Charge 31 32 Each Driver 11 12 Theater License: Indoor 118 123 Outdoor 237 248 Contractor's License 64 68 3.2 Beer License: On -Sale 100* 100* Off -Sale 30* 30* Temporary Food & Beer 16 /Day 17 /Day LICENSES DUE JULY 1st: Used Car Dealer 237 248 * Fee established by State. - 8 - 9/14 LICENSES DUE AUGUST 1st: 300* 300* Motor Vehicle repair 43 45 Service Station: 200* 200" First Pump 48 50 Each Additional Pump 7 8 Trailer Rental: 900 940 First 5 Trailers 16 17 Each Additional Trailer 5 6 LICENSES DUE NOVEMBER 1st: Club Liquor License 300* 300* On -Sale Liquor 4,595 4,800 Off -Sale Liquor 200* 200" Sunday Liquor 200* 200* Beer and Wine: Seating up to 25 900 940 Each Additional 10 Seats 118 123 Maximum 2,390 2,500 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES: Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Commercial Base Charge (9 of Bond Issue) 1% 19 Minimum 5,150 5,380 Maximum 20,600 21,530 Amount Paid With Application 2,000 2,000 Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Multiple Dwellings Application Fee 2,000 2,100 Liquor License Investigation Fee 360 375 Block Party ,License 16 17 Carnival License 117 122 Solicitor License: Base Per Company 64 67 Additional Per Solicitor 32 33 Auctioneer License: Annual 59 62 Daily 16 17 Pawn Shop 59 62 Pending Assessment Searches 6 7 Police Accident Report Copies 5 5 Cat and Dog Licenses: Male 6 7 Female 6 7 Neutered /Spayed 3 4 Tax Increment Financing Application Fee (escrow) 5,000 5,200 Building Relocation 117 122 Community Design Review Board 64 67 Sewer Connection Permit (Per Connection): Residential Connection 32 33 Non - Residential Connection 48 50 Moving Permit 64 67 Wrecking Permit 32 33 *Fee established by State. - 9 - 9/14 Driveway Permit 64 67 Wrecking Permit 32 33 Driveway Permit 7 7 Property Owner List +3.70 /Name +3.90 /Name Mobile Home Permits 37 39 PUBLICATIONS (Includes sales tax Zoning Code 6.25 6.50 Platting Code 3.25 3.40 Sign Code 2.75 2.90 Comprehensive Plan 10.25 10.70 Zoning Map 3.75 3.90 City Map 3.75 3.90 Section Map 3.75 3.90 Planning Commission: Minutes 0 7 /yr. Agenda Packet 0 82 /yr. Approved first reading of an ordinance approving an increase in Planning fees. 9. MTC Bus Changes Approved the following MTC Bus Changes: New Bus Route Segments - MTC Route 11 -B ON: County Road D between North Entrance to Maplewood Mall and Hazelwood Avenue. ON: Hazelwood Avenue between Co. Rd. D and Beam Ave. ON: Arcade Street between Co. Rd. B and Roselawn Avenue. ON: Roselawn Avenue between Arcade St. and Edgerton St. The following segments of streets will no longer be used by MTC buses: ON: County Road B between Arcade St. and Edgerton St. ON: Edgerton Street between Roselawn Ave. and Skillman Ave. ON: Hazelwood Street between Frost Ave. and Co. Rd. B. New Bus Stops Route 11 Southbound: ON: County Road D AT: Best Buy Company In front Maple Ridge Apartments In front ON: Hazelwood Avenue AT: Hazel Ridge Apartments Across.from ON: Arcade Street AT: Roselawn Ave. Nearside Route 11 Northbound: ON: Arcade Street AT: Roselawn Ave. Farside ON: Hazelwood Ave. AT: Hazel Ridge Apartments At Driveway ON: County Road D - 10 - 9/14 AT: Maple Ridge Apartments Across from AT: North Entrance to Maplewood Mall Nearside 10. Planning Commission Resignation Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 166 WHEREAS, David Whitcomb has been a member of the Planning Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota, since March 20, 1980, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience, insights and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compen- sation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has con- sistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that David Whitcomb is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated ser- vice and we wish him continued success in the future. Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 167 WHEREAS, Jeff Hanson has been a member of the Planning Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota, since November 24, 1986, and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience, insights and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consis- tently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Jeff Hanson is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him continued success in the future. 11. Reschedule October 12 Council Meeting Approved the rescheduling of the October 12, 1987, Council Meeting to October 15, 1987, as the 12th is a holiday. - 11 - 9/14 12. Budget Transfer - Election Supplies Approved the transfer of $8,000 from the Contingency Fund to the Election Supply Account to purchase support equipment and supplies for the new Optech III P voting system. 13. Change Order No. 3 and Final Payment (Crestview Drive - Hudson Place Water Main) Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 168 WHEREAS. the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 85 -07, Crestview Drive - Hudson Place Water Main and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 85 -07 Change Order Three, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Three, and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE- SOTA, that the project is completed and accepted and final payment on the construction contract is hereby authorized. 14. Change Order No. 2 - Arkwright Street Improvement; City Project 86 -12 Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 169 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minneota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86 -12, Arkwright Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 -12 Change Order Two. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Two. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: 2675 Stillwater Road (Ader) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Daniel Ader for a conditional use permit for a home occupation to construct and sell patio furniture at 2675 Stillwater Road. - 12 - 9/14 b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Commissioner George Rossbach presented the Planning Commission recom- mendation. d. Daniel Ader, the applicant, spoke on behalf of his request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9 -170 WHEREAS, Daniel J. Ader initiated a conditional use permit to operate a patio furniture construction and sales home occupation at the following - described property: Lot 21, Block 5, Midvale Acres No. 2 This property is also known as 2675 Stillwater Road, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 3, 1987. The Planning Commis- sion recommended to the City Council that said permit be ap- proved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1987. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con- sidered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. - 13 - 9/14 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run- off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the requirements in Section 36 -66 (4) (b) pertaining to the operation of a home occupation. 2. A fire extinguisher with a minimum classification of 2A lOBC shall be provided in the workshop. Dust shall not be allowed to accumulate so as to be an explosion hazard. 3. The house shall have its address clearly posted on the house as required by code. 4. The only signage allowed shall be a two - square -foot wall sign mounted on the house. 5. Only one set of patio furniture shall be displayed in the rear yard. No furniture shall be displayed in the front or side yards. 6. There shall be no parking on Stillwater Road. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Joker. 2. 7:10 P.M., 2650 White Bear Avenue (Former Harmony School Building) a. Plan Amendment (4 votes) b. Conditional Use Permit - 14 - 9/14 Councilmember Juker moved to delay this item until after Item F - 6. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. LTD Insurance a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to (1) award t wai six iates. (2) revise Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Authorizing Issuance of Citation (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 609 AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE I OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO ISSUE CITATIONS FOR CODE VIOLATIONS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1 -26. Issuance of Ordinance Violations Summonses. The persons hereafter named, as employees or agents of the City of Maplewood, shall have power to issue summonses with complaints incorporated therein (citations), in the form adopted by rule of the District Court, but such issuance by those named shall relate only to offenses involving the City Code; building construction, operation or maintenance; fire and fire prevention; public health and sanitation; animal control; and zoning. No such employee or agent hereinafter authorized to issue said summonses shall be authorized to arrest or otherwise take a violator into custody or to secure a promise to appear in court in lieu of arrest. Those authorized are as follows: Fire Marshal and Deputy Fire Marshal Director of Public Works Code Enforcement Officer' Building Inspector Plumbing Inspector Reserve Police Officers Community Service Officers Environmental Health Officer Animal Control Officer Other employee:, or agents of the City of Maplewood specifically designated in writing by the City Manager shall also have such authority. Nothing - 15 - 9/14 herein shall limit the Minnesota P.O.S.T. Board licensed Maplewood City Police Officers from performing their sworn duties. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. 2. Organized Garbage Collection a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson established a date of 10 -5 -87 at 7:05 P.M., to discuss organized garbage collection. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 3. 7:20 P.M., Conditional Use Permit — 1560 E. County Road B (John Glenn Jr. High) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of N.E. Metropolitan Intermediate School District No. 916 for a conditional use permit to construct an addition to John Glenn Jr. High to hold classes in special education for severely handicapped children. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: Brian Buchmayer, School District 622 Mrs. Stanley Sommers, 2107 Hazelwood Mr. Stanley Sommers, 2107 Hazelwood Mr. Don Muchow, 2081 Hazelwood Representative of District 916 N.E. Metro e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until a storm sewer feasibility report is received. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — Councilmember Juker Nays — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: — 16 — 9/14 87 -9- 171 WHEREAS, N. E. Metropolitan Intermediate School District #916 initiated a conditional use permit to add onto John Glenn Jr. High School at the following- described property: Membrez Addition, Vac Sts accruing and fol with 66 ft esmt to Prosperity Rd the W 139 9/10 ft of Lot 3 and all of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Sabin Garden Lots and all of sd Membrez Addition This property is also known as 1560 East County Road B, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 17, 1987. The Planning Commis- sion recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1987. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an oppor- tunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run- off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. - 17 - 9/14 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use -would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 11. There would be no significant affect on the development of this parcel as zoned. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated July 16, 1987, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board. 2. No occupancy permits shall be issued until construction con- tracts have been signed for the development of a new storm sewer system, or until on -site ponding is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Juker 4 7:30 P.M., Keller Parkway (Kath) a. Flood Insurance Rate Map Amendment - 4 Votes b. Variance 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Cynthia Kath for rezoning to revise the City's flood insurance rate map and a shoreline setback variance to construct a single dwelling on an existing parcel adjoining Kohlman Lake. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the request. 4. Cynthia Kath, the applicant spoke on behalf of her request. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. A letter of opposition was read, sign by Harold, Robert and Alice Kohlman Don Christensen, 1111 E. County Road C expressed his views. - 18 - 9/14 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Anderson site ana a 15 toot butter Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker Nays - Councilmembers Bastian and Wasiluk. Motion failed. 8. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item for further investi- gation. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and Wasiluk. Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson. 5. 7:40 P.M., Brooks Court (Morris) a. Variance b. Lot Division 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Dave Morris for approval of a lot division and the following two variances: 1. A 1,270- square -foot lot area variance. The proposed area of Lot 21 would be 8,730 square feet. Code requires at least 10,000 square feet. 2. A 7 -1/2 foot lot width variance. The proposed lot width, at the setback line, would be reduced to 67.5 feet. Code requires at least 75 feet. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner George Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons for or against the proposal. The - 19 - 9/14 following expressed their views: Dave Morris, the applicant Peter Dey, 956 Brooks Court Resident of 964 Brooks 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Mayor Greavu moved to ove the lot division t Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 8. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9 -172 WHEREAS, Dave Morris applied for a variance for the following - described property: Lot 21, Block 4, Carsgrove Meadows First Addition WHEREAS, section 36 -69 and 30 -8 (f) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires single - dwelling lots to have at least 10,000 square feet of lot area and 75 feet of lot width at the building setback line; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 8,730 square feet of lot area and 67.5 feet of lot width, requiring a variance of 1,270 square feet and 75 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commis- sion on July 6, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1987, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the home to the west has a sideyard setback of approximately 20 feet. Therefore, a house on Lot 21 would not appear crowded, even though the lot width would be less than required. 2. The character and appearance of the neighborhood would be maintained. - 20 - 9/14 3. If the lot split and variances were denied, Lot 21 could not be put to reasonable use. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 6. 7:50 P.M., Parkway Terrace (County Road B and Stanich Court) a. Street and Alley Vacations b. Preliminary Plat 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Sherman Boosalis Companies for approval of a prelimi- nary plat for 36 single dwelling lots and vacation of three streets and two alley rights -of -way. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission recom- mendation. 5. A representative of the developer spoke on behalf of the proposal. 6. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None were heard. 7. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 8. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9 -173 WHEREAS, Sherman Boosalis Companies initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described properties: Alley right -of -ways in Blocks 17 and 32, and the following street right -of -ways: Laurie Road, Sandhurst Avenue, and Lark Avenue between Ariel and German Streets, all in Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul, Section 11, Town- ship 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley and street right -of -ways have signed a petition for this vacation; - 21 - 9/14 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 31, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1987, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the CityStaff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described alley and street right -of -ways, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lot Two, Block One, and Lots One and Two, Blocks 16, 17 and 32, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The street and alley right -of -ways are not needed. 2. The proposed street alignment would preserve more desirable mature trees than would otherwise be possible. 3. Construction of the east /west Sandhurst Avenue right -of -way would require additional driveways onto County Road B. The proposed north /south right -of -way alignment would reduce or totally eliminate this undesirable situation.. Seconded by Cuncilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 9. Mayor Greavu Terrace a. Public Improvements must be guaranteed for Lots 9 -16, Block 1 and Blocks 2 and 3 or they must be platted as an outlot. b. Approval of a sewer plan amendment and obtain a commit- ment from North St. Paul to allow the lots east of those fronting on German Street to be served by North St. Paul water and sanitary sewer. c. Construction of a permanent storm sewer outlet must be guaranteed. The proposed temporary pending shall not be permitted unless found to be acceptable by North St. Paul. The design specifications must be approved by the City Engineer, Ramsey County and North St. Paul. - 22 - 9/14 If permanent, on -site ponding will be constructed, the plat shall include an outlot which includes one foot of elevation above the 100 -year storm design. The outlot shall be dedicated to the public for drainage and storm water ponding. If a temporary pond will be permitted by North St. Paul, a recordable drainage easement shall be submitted to the Maplewood City Engineer for approval and recording. The applicant shall also pay the recording fees. Any lot(s) that will adjoin a temporary or permanent pond shall have at least 10,000 square feet outside of the easement. d. City Engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. The grading plan shall indicate the number, location and type of four- inch - and- larger- diameter healthy trees to be retained. These trees shall be identified for retention on the site. Evidence of North St. Paul's approval of the construction plans that affect them shall be provided. e. The center line of Stanich Street shall be moved west to line up with the center line of Stanich Court. All lots must comply with minimum lot requirements. f. Submittal of a temporary easement for a 100 -foot cul -de -sac bulb for the end of Stanich Street, if homes will be oc- cupied before the construction of Ariel Street is guaranteed. g. No lot that would front only on Ariel Street shall be platted until the construction of Ariel Street is guaranteed. h. The east /west portion of proposed "Stanich Curve" shall be changed to "Laurie Road" or such other name acceptable to the Director of Public Safety. i. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement and required surety to guarantee, but not be limited to, the following items: 1. Construction of all required on -site public improvements. 2. Repair of the service trenches, cut into German Street. 3. Planting of trees. At least 92 mature trees must be growing on the site when construction is com- pleted. Trees shown on the final grading plan to be retained shall be credited toward the total number required. j. Deed restrictions shall be recorded with the lots abutting County Road B stating that driveways will not be allowed on County Road B without City approval. - 23 - 9/14 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 2 7:10 P.M., 2650 White Bear Avenue (Formerly Harmony School Building) (Continued) a. Plan Amendment - 4 Votes b. Conditional Use Permit 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of School District No. 622 for a land use amendment from RM, residential medium density and RH, residential high density to S, school for the former Harmony School site. A conditional use permit is also requested to use the existing facilities for non - profit, education - related and child -care uses. Maplewood and North St. Paul would also continue to be allowed to use the northeasterly portion of the site for recreation programs. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission recommenda- tion. 5. Brain Buckmayer, representing the school district, spoke on behalf of the request. He also answered questions from the Council. 6. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: Linda Olson LaPitz, 2005 E. County Road C 7. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 8. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9- 174 WHEREAS, the North St. Paul- Maplewood - Oakdale school district initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, residential medium density and RH, residential high density to S, school for the former Harmony School Site, northeast of White Bear Avenue and County Road C. This property is more commonly described as 2650 White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 31, 1987, to consider this plan amendment. Notice - 24 - 9/14 thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City council considered said plan amendment on September 14, 1987. The Council considered reports and recom- mendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The school has decided not to reoffer this site for a housing development. The first sale fell through. 2. The proposed community education and day care uses for the site and the decision to hold this site for the possible reuse as an elementary school are in the public interest. 3. The city has attained substantial compliance with adopted housing production goals for 1980 to 1990. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 9. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9- 175 WHEREAS, the North St. Paul - Maplewood- Oakdale School district initiated a conditional use permit to use the former Harmony School site for nonprofit, education - related and child care uses. The legal description of the property is: Unplatted land beginning at inter- section of White Bear Avenue and S. line of SW 1/2 thence northerly on said center line 420.55 feet, thence east par. with said south line 311 feet, thence northerly par, with said center line 140 feet, thence due N. 107.07 feet, thence east 391.55 feet to point 658.95 feet north from said south line thence to said S L at point 200 feet west of said 1/4 corner, thence west to beginning, subject to roads in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22. This property is also known as 2650 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning commission on August 31, 1987. The Planning Commis- sion recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood Citr Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1987. Notice Thereof was published and mailed pursuant to - 25 - 9/14 law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above — described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings —of —fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run —off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of a dimensioned striping plan for the existing parking spaces. 2. Council may require additional parking spaces as a condition of permit renewal, if the existing parking lot is found to be inadequate. — 26 — 9/14 3. Maplewood and North St. Paul shall have continued use of the athletic facilities in the northeast portion of the site until that part of the site develops provided the use of these facilities does not interfere with the applicant's use of the property. 4. The nonprofit uses shall be restricted to health and wellness programs, special and community education, office, worship and other similar uses. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued) 3. Preliminary Plat: Maplewood Meadows a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Maplewood Meadows Addition preliminary Dlat (plans dated 5 -19 -87) snhiert to .cnti.efartinn 1. District Court approval to release the City park land that was previously vacated, subject to retaining a ponding easement over Outlots C through I. 2. Any portion of the former park that will be combined with property to the south shall be designated as an outlot. A recordable deed for each outlot to be transferred shall be submitted to the City. the City will record the deed(s) once the plat is recorded. A check for the recording costs shall be submitted with the deed(s). The property owner to receive the deed must agree to accept it. 3. Any of the former park land that is not included in condition two must be combined with the adjacent lots to the north. Lot lines shall coincide with the proposed lot lines to the north as much as possible. 4. Redesign the plat for Staff approval to provide for at least a 100 -foot setback from the pipeline or provide at least a six - foot berm to protect the homes within 100 feet against the radiant heat from an explosion. If berms are provided, the homes may not be constructed within 80 feet of the p.i_)eline. 5. Omit Lot 21, Block Two, if the adjacent park land to the south is not included. Lots 18 through 20 may be redesigned for double - dwelling lots. 6. The pipeline easement must be clearly labeled and designated on the plat. The easement must be included in the title for each affected property. 7. Submit recordable deed restrictions for each double- fronting lot to prohibit access from County Road D. - 27 - 9/14 8. City recording of the previously adopted resolutions to vacate Lakewood Drive between Brenner Avenue and County Road D. Re- cording of these easements is subject to the submission of the developer's agreement to guarantee compliance with the condi- tions of vacation. 9. City Engineer approval of the final grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. 'Phe portion of the grading plan within the Amoco and NSP easements must also be approved by these respective corporations. The grading plan shall be revised as follows: a. If the property owner to the south of proposed Outlet C will receive proposed Outlot C, then the pond shall be shifted to the north and west to minimize its encroach- ment on this outlet. Grading of this outlot area shall also be minimized. b. The pipeline's elevation and location shall be shown on the grading plan. c. The erosion control recommendations made by the Soil Con- servation Service in their letter dated June 29, 1987, shall be complied with. d. A skimming device shall be provided at the pond outlet to prevent an oil leak from going downstream. 10. The portion of the plat located east of proposed Lot 21 shall be named "Bellaire Avenue ". 11. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, to include but not be limited to: a. Enlarging the pond, as directed by the City Engineer, west of Lakewood Drive and constructing storm sewer from this site to that pond. b. Construction of all required on -site public improvements. c. Removing the Lakewood Drive street surface north of Gall Avenue and seeding the vacated right -of -way. d. Replacing the asphalt curb at Brenner Avenue and Lakewood Drive with a concrete curb. e. Adherence to the erosion control procedures outlined on page four of the Soil Conservation Service's letter dated June 29, 1987. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Noise Ordinance - 28 - 9/14 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved first reading of an ordinnce providing noise controls within the City. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk Councilmember Bastian abstained. c. The following residents voiced their complaints about the noise, dust, etc., that is resulting from the St. Paul Water Department operations: Resident of 91 E. Skillman Ted Leigh Mrs. Peterson, 1999 Jackson Glenn Peterson, 1999 Jackson Resident of 94 E. Skillman d. Councilmember Anderson moved to establish a meeting date for Council to me with the St. Paul Wa ter Dep artment, area residents, Senator Hughes, Repre- sentative Vento, Osthoff, etc., and the meeting to be held at the Parkside Fire Department. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 2. Assessment Ordinance - lst Reading a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance that allows partial payment of assessments before certification. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 3. Plan Amendment - Park Plan - County Road B a. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report. b. Director of Parks and Recreation Odegard and Park and Recreation Com- missioner Don Christiansen spoke on behalf of the proposal. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9- 176 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to delete a neighborhood park search area from the area east of German Street and north of County Road B. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning commission held a public hearing on August 17, 1987, to consider this plan amendmenC. Notice - 29 - 9/14 thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on September 14, 1987. The Council considered reports and recom- mendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The projected area population is significantly below that desired to support a neighborhood park. 2. The development of Sherwood Neighborhood Park (Cope Avenue and Kennard Street) was not anticipated when the parks section of the comprehensive plan was adopted. Sherwood Park will be able to adequately serve the neighborhood park needs of the residents in the subject area. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Proposed 1988 Budget a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to set a public hearing on the 1988 Budget for October 5, 1987, and that a review of the proposed budget be on 9 -21 -87 at 5:00 P.M. and 9- 22 -87, 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. Expand Feasibility Report (Markfort Addition) Edgerton /Roselawn Storm Sewer City Project 85 -08 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9- 177 WHEREAS, it is proposed to expand the feasibility report of the Edgerton - Roselawn Storm Sewer, City Project 85 -08, to include the outlet and ponding system to serve the Markfort Addition and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improve- ment, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, - 30 - 9/14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. 2. That said report shall not be prepared until the project petitioners establish an escrow with the City equal to 150% of the estimated report preparation cost. The escrow amount shall be $4,500 and shall be refunded only upon ordering of a project. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. Order Public Hearing - Southlawn Avenue (Beam to County Road D) City Project 85 -17. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Coucilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9- 178 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Southlawn Drive between Beam Avenue and County Road D, City Project 85 -17, by construction of water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and street improvements, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engi the proposed improvement on nue and County road D, City water main, sanitary sewer, is feasible and should best ceived. leer advising this Council that Southlawn Drive between Beam Ave - Project 85 -17, by construction of storm sewer and street improvements be made as proposed, is hereby re- 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in ac- cordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $912,400. - 31 - 9/14 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 28th day of September, 1987, at 7:20 P.M. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. Order Public Hearing - Mayer Street Watermain (Bush to Minnehaha) City Project 87 -13 Deleted from Agenda 8. Street Light Petition a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve Alternative No. installation of the street lights and incur the costs of the Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson and Wasiluk Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Bastian and Juker. Motion failed. c. Councilmember Juker moved Alternative No. 3. Councilmember Bastian moved to table until the shirt sleeve session on the budget. Councilmember Bastian withdrew his motion. Councilmember Juker withdrew her motion. d. Councilmember Anderson moved to refer the matter to Staff for detailed costs. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 9. Change Order No. 1 - Beam Avenue Water Main - City Project 84 -12 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9- 179 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore on March 9, 1987, ordered made Improvement Project 84 -12 and has let a - 32 - 9/14 construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 84 -12 Change Order No. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 1. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 10. Presentation - James D. Kerrigan /Drainage Problem a. Mr. Kerrigan informed the Council of his drainage problems that he is experiencing at 2620 Carver Avenue and requested their assistance. b. No action taken. City Attorney Patrick Kelly stated the problem was not the City's responsibility since the driveway (where the problem is located) is on private property. 11. Recognition Dinner - Budget Transfer a. Councilmember Anderson ssions Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk from Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Bastian 12. Utilities Improvements prior to plat approval. a. Mr. Jerry Mogren requested he be allowed to construct utilities within the Kohlman Overlook Addition prior to plat approval. b. Mayor Greavu e Mr 1. Permission to initiate construction of streets and utilities does not guarantee and warrant plat approval. 2. Mr. Mogren will not hold the City of Maplewood responsible for claims, demands, causes of action, suits, losses, damages, claims of damage, liabilities, expenses, liens, costs or attorney fees, which directly or indirectly are caused by or resulting from plat denial. 3. City of Maplewood does not represent by granting permission for placement of street and utilities that said Mogren plat will be approved and any expenses or costs incurred are at Mr. Mogren's expense. Mr. Mogren will hold the City of Maplewood harmless from any claim of reliance from the City's action. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. - 33 - 9/14 13. Approval of Plans and Specifications — Mailand Road a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9 -180 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on June 8, 1987, plans and specifications for Mailand Road Booster Station Modifica— tion, Project 86 -15, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction bulletin an advertise— ment for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 A.M., on the 1st day of October, 1987, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 59 of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and in— structed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. J . Visitor Presentation 1. Mr. Ted Leigh a. Mr. Leigh requested the Council correct the drainage problem at the end of his driveway. b. Staff to investigate. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Visitor Presentation a. Councilmember Wasiluk suggested Visitor Presentation be placed earlier in the Agenda. b. No Action taken. — 34 — 9/14 Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 11:45 P.M., to reconvene at 4:00 P.M., Thursday, September 24, 1987. Mayor Greavu reconvened the September 14, 1987 Meeting at 4:17 P.M., Thursday, September 24, 1987. Present: Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Wasiluk. (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS (Continued) 2. Larger Lots a. Councilmember Wasiluk commented on the need for larger lots in the south end. 3, Composting Hours a. Mayor Greavu requested Ramsey County be contacted to see if the com- posting site could be open one day during the week. b. Staff to investigate. 4. Recognition Dinner Discussed under Item I -11. 5. Development Committee a. Councilmember Anderson stated he feels there should be a development committee established to encourage quality "commercial development. 6. Receptionist Deleted from Agenda 7. Licensing Department Deleted from Agenda 8. Survey Lots a. Councilmember Anderson stated the building inspector should be verifying where survey stakes are located when building permits are granted. b. Added to 10 -15 -87 Agenda. 9. Manager's Evaluation. a. Councilmember Bastian stated a meeting should be established for the Manager's evaluation. The present documents for evaluation should also be reviewed. - 35 - 9/14 10. Board of Water Commissioners a. Councilmember Bastian stated legislation should be initiated to obtain representation from municipalities on the Board of Water Commissioners. b. Added to 10 -15 -87 Agenda. 11. Senior Citizen Advisory Committee a. Councilmember Bastian requested that Council be made aware of what functions are provided for senior citizens. He feels there should be a senior citizen advisory committee that could help in way of housing, transportation, shopping, parks and recreation, medical, etc., for the seniors. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOURNMENT 4:48 P.M. City Clerk _ - 36 - 9/14 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 28, 1987 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 87 -20 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 87 -14 (July 13, 1987) was held in the at 7:02 P.M. by Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 87 -14 (July 13, 1987) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 87 -15 (July 27, 1987) Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 87 -15 (July 27, 1987) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Meeting No. 87 -19 (September 21, 1987) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Special Meeting No. 87 -19 (September 21, 1987) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Bastian. Councilmember Wasiluk abstained. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Highway 120 Development 2. Billboards 3. Petition - 1897 Birmingham Street 4. 694 and County Road D 5. Add E -12, Election Judges 6. Add L -1, Planning Commission Appointment Procedure Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson approve the Consent Ae Juker, Ayey - 1. Accounts Payable. Approved the accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses, Check Register dated September 15, 1987, through September 23, 1987 - $704,623.05: Part II, Payroll dated September 18, 1987, gross amount of $140,577.40) as submitted. 2. Renew - Employee Insurance Contracts Authorized that the existing one -year contracts for employee insurance be renewed with Blue Cross /Blue Shield, Group Health, Employee Benefits Plan and Commercial Life. 3. Time Extension: Crestview Third Addition Approved a one -year time extension for the remaining unplatted portion of the Crestview Third Addition preliminary plat, subject to the 10 -9 -85 conditions of approval. 4. Time Extension: 2696 Hazelwood (Healtheast) Approved a two -year time extension for the Hazel Ridge planned unit develop- ment, subject to the original May 13, 1985 conditions of approval. 5. Final Plat: Lynnwood Terrace Approved the Lynnwood Terrace final plat subject to the condition that a signed developer's agreement must be entered into prior to signing the final plat. 6. Final Plat: Gonyea Oak Heights First Addition Approved the Gonyea's Oak Heights First Addition final plat. 7. Final Plat: Parkway Terrace Approved the Parkway Terrace final plat of eight lots fronting on German Street. 8. Final Plat: Maplewood Knoll Approved the Maplewood Knoll final plat. 9. Rotary Membership Authorized the Manager to join the Maplewood Rotary Club. - 2 - 9/28 10 11 Final Payment - Cope Water Tank Painting Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 181 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL that final payment for the Cope Water Tank painting be made for a total contract amount of $59,189.00. Final Payment: Bituminous Overlay, Project 87 -26 Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 182 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that final payment for the bituminous overlay, Project 87 -26 be made for a total contract amount of $125,234.87. 12. Election Judges Resolution No. 87 - 9 - 183 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1987 General Election, Tuesday, November 3, 1987: Precinct No. 1 Precinct No. 5 Agnes Allen, Chairman Elsie Wiegert, Chairman Orpha Getty Emma Klebe Karl Biebighauser Phyllis Erickson Evelyn Axdahl Annette LaCasse Irene Ling Precinct No. 6 Precinct No. 2 Kathy Supan, Chairman Patricia Thompson, Chairman Gunborg Mowchan Kathleen Dittel Linda Prigge Bea Hendricks Judy Widholm Florence Stella Sandy Jones Helen Jean Dickson Precinct No. 7 Precinct No. 3 Margaret Wolszon, Chairman Barb Leiter, Chairman Betty Haas Charlene Arbuckle Armella Podgorski Doris Broady Joan Cottrell Alice Miller Mildred Burke Precinct No. 4 Precinct No. 8 Caroline Warner, Chairman Lorraine Fischer, Chairman Betty Eddy Betty Berglund Joyce Lipinski Rita Frederickson Marjory Tooley Mildred Houck Thelma Ling - 3 - 9/28 Precinct No. 9 Mary Johnson, Chairman Dolores Mallet Margaret McDonald Theodore Haas Precinct No. 10 Pat Werden, Chairman Richard Lofgren Mary Lou Lieder Diane Golaski Anne Fosburgh Precinct No. 11 Shirley Luttrell, Chairman Maxine Olson Delores Lofgren Helen King F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Gonyea's Third Addition a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Street Vacation c. Preliminary Plat Precinct No. 12 Mary Libhardt, Chairman Deloris Fastner Mildred Dehen Frances Davidson Precinct No. 13 Jack Arbuckle, Chairman Donald Wiegert Gladys Hervig Kathy Haynes Precinct No. 14 Grace Locke, Chairman Marilyn Wold Kathleen Tracy Marjorie Lee Elsie Anderson 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Dennis D. Gonyea for preliminary plat approval for 19 single dwelling lots and vacation of an obsolete portion of Lakewood Drive right of way. The City is recommending a land use plan amendment to move the alignment of a planned minor collector street. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 3. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedures of the public hearing. 4. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 5. Director of Public Works presented the plans regarding improvements. 6. Commissioner George Rossbach presented the Planning Commission recommendation. 7. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: James A. Fisher, 2406 Highwood Avenue Arnie Esterbrooks, representing Mr. Gonyea MaryLee Maids, 2322 Highwood Avenue — 4 — 9/28 8. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 9. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (Plan Amendment). 87 -9 -184 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to shift the location of a north /south minor collector or street on the south side of Highwood Avenue from Schaller Drive to Lakewood Drive. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 31, 1987, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All per- sons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Com- mission recommended to the City Council that said plan amend- ment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on August 31, 1987. The Council considered reports and recommenda- tions from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The present alignment is inconsistent with the intent of the Environmental Protection Ordinance to preserve significant steep slopes wherever practical. 2. An acceptable alternative alignment exists. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 10. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (Street Vacation). 87 -9 -185 WHEREAS, Dennis D. Gonyea initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in: Lakewood Drive street right -of -way lying north of the westerly extension of the south line of Lot Nine, Block Seven, Pleasant - view Park No. 2 and south of the westerly extension of the south line of the north fifteen feet of Lot Five, Block Seven, Plea - santview Park No. 2. - 5 - 9/28 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street right -of -way have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 31, 1987. The Planning Commission recommendbd to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 28, 1987, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and pre- sent written statements. The Council also considered re- ports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described street right -of- way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lots Five through Nine, Block Seven, Pleasantview Park and, except the north 295 feet, the following part of Lots 1, 5 and 6 lying easterly of a line running from the southwest corner of the east one -half of said Lot Six to a point on the north line of and twenty feet from the northwest corner of said Lot One, Highwood Heights. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: , 1. This right -of -way is obsolete. It was granted before an area street plan concept was available. 2. Vacation would eliminate the potential of double- fronting- lots which are prohibited, unless no other alternative is available. This vacation is subject to the retention of the south ten feet for a storm sewer easement. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 11. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve GonN a. The construction of Lakewood Drive to Highwood Avenue must be guaranteed. b. A contract for the water tower must be signed before any of the lots can be created. A plat may be recorded to dedicate the right -of -way for Lakewood Drive before the water tower - 6 - 9/28 construction is guaranteed, but the land on either side of the right -of -way must be platted as outlots. c. Contracts must be signed for the construction of sani- tary sewer from this site to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's trunk sewer in Carver Avenue or to the City of St. Paul's sewer in McKnight Road. d. Calculations must be submitted to guarantee that the proposed ponding easement to the southwest of this site (required for phases 1 -3) and the pond's outlet will be adequate. This easement shall be of record before final plat approval. e. Final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans must be approved by the City Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: (1) The street plans shall provide for an on- street trail. (2) The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain desirable mature trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this approved grading plan for each lot may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. f. Submittal of a temporary 100 - foot - diameter cul -de -sac bulb easement for the north cul -de -sac. g. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with required surety for all required public streets, utilities, erosion control and tree replanting, if necessary (see Condition k). h. The right -of -way for Southcrest Court shall be curved, as necessary, to the northwest to provide at least 100 -feet of depth between the south property line and the future cul -de -sac bulb. i. "Dorland Curve" shall be changed to a name acceptable to the Director of Public Safety. j. The east boundary of the plat shall,include the west fifteen feet of vacated Lakewood Drive right -of -way. k. A plan, prepared by a qualified expert, shall be submitted for the removal of diseased trees and any other necessary thin- ning required for the overall health of remaining trees. This plan shall include the location, type and size of the mature trees to be removed due to disease or grading and the mature - 7 - 9/28 trees that will be retained. The plan shall specify the location and type of trees to be planted, if required, in accordance :with the provisions of Section 9- 191(5)(b) of the Environmental Protection Ordinance. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. 7:10 P.M., Alley Vacation - Between Fenton, Walter and Gordon a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of John Rawson, Jr., for partial vacation of an unimproved alley right of way that is located northwest of Gordon Avenue and Walter Street. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission recommendation. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption• ' . WHEREAS, John Rawson, Jr. initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described right -of -way: 1. The alley right -of -way in Block Four, Lakeside Park, lying north of the north line of Lots One through Four and the westerly extension of said line. 2. The alley right -of -way between the easterly extension of the south line of Lot Twenty and easterly extension of the north line of Lot Eleven, Block Five, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley right - of -way have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 31, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. - 8 - 9/28 3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 28, 1987, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WIIEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described alley right -of -way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: 1. Lots 1 -20, Block 5, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone. 2. Lots 1 -5, Block 4, Lakeside park All in Section 16, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. This right -of -way is the result of obsolete platting that occurred prior to the establishment of the City. Maplewood's policy has been to vacate alley rights -of -way whenever possible. 2. This alley does not serve as a access to any of the adjoining properties 3. The grade south of Fenton Avenue is too steep to construct the alley. This vacation is subject to the retention of a utility easement over the following described areas: 1. The north ten feet of the alley right -of -way in Block Four, Parkside Addition. 2. The west ten feet of the alley right -of -way in Block Five, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Gladstone, lying between the easterly extension of the south line of Lot Twenty and the easterly extension of the north line of the south thirty feet of Lot Sixteen. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. 3. 7:20 P.M., Southlawn Drive —Beam Avenue to County Road D, City Project 85 -17 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the construction of Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. -9- 9/28 c. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. Te following voiced their opinions: Robert Hajicek, 1700 E. County Road D Wayne Beckman, representing Joseph Co. J. Scott Walters, representing William Korstad Bob Ringler, Maplewood Holiday Inn (Days Inn) e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -9 -187 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of street improvements on Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on September 28, 1987, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct street improvements on Phase I of Southlawn Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is designated Engineer for this'improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all. 4. 7:30 P.M., Tax Increment Financing Plan Revision. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request to revise the City's tax increment financing plan to allow the City to spend the tax increment from the Mainstreet Store and new addition to the Maplewood Mall to several public improvement projects as listed in the report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Mary Ippel, bonding consultant, Briggs and Morgan, explained the revisions. -10- 9/28 d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: M W MEE RESOLUTION ENLARGING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RELATING THERETO, AND ADOPTING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO WHEREAS: A. It has been proposed that the City of Maplewood enlarge Development District No. 1 and adopt a development program with respect thereto and create Economic Development District No. 1 -2, (the "Tax Increment District ") within Development District No. 1 and adopt a tax increment financing plan with respect thereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179 and Sections 469.124 through 469.134 (Collectively the "Act "); B. The Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be pre- pared a development program and tax increment financing plan for Develop- ment District No. 1, and has caused to be prepared a proposed tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District. C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the creation of Development District No. 1 and the Tax Increment District and the adoption of the proposed development program and tax in- crement financing plan relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 and Special Intermediate School District No. 916 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the Tax Increment Districts, a review by the City Planning Commission of the proposed Development Pro- gram for Development District No. 1, and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD as follows: 1. Development District No. 1. There is hereby extablished in the City of Maplewood Development District No. 1, the initial boundaries of which are fixed and determined as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Development Program. The development program for Development District No. 1, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Manager, is adopted as the Development Program for Development District No. 1. - 11 - 9/28 3. Tax Increment District. There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a tax increment financing district to be known as "Economic Development District No. 1 -2." If CPI agrees to subdivide Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition into two parcels reflecting the existing Maplewood Mall site and the site the mall addition will be constructed on, Economic Development District No. 1' -2 shall have the initial boundaries as shown on the attached Exhibit B incorporated herein by reference. If CPI does not agree to subdivide Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition in the manner described in the foregoing sentence, Economic Development District No. 1 -2 shall have the initial boundaries as shown on the attached Exhibit C incorporated herein by reference. 4. Tax Increment Financing Plan. The tax increment financing plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Financing District, and the City Council makes the following findigns: (a) Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is an economic develop- ment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 the specific basis for such determination being: Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is being created so that the tax increments derived therefrom can be used to fund the public improvements set forth in the development program which will stimulate additional develop- ment in Development District No. 1, thereby creating new jobs and expanding the City's tax base. (b) The proposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The development activities within Development District No. 1 to be financed by tax increment financing are not financeable using traditional methods of municipal fi- nancing. Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within De- velopment District No. 1. (c) The tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons for supporting this finding are that: (i) The Tax Increment District is properly zoned; (ii) The tax increment financing plan will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's com- prehensive plan. - 12 - 9/28 (d) The tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Tax Increment District by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: As previously stated the development activities, consisting of public improvements, to be financed by tax increment financing are necessary so that additional commercial development by private enter - prise can occur within Development District No. 1. 5. Public Purpose. The development program for Development District No. 1 and the adoption of the tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to pro- vide employment opportunities to improve the tax base, and to improve the gen- eral economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 6. Certification. The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original assessed value of the Tax Increment District as described in the tax increment financing plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original assessed value has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Manager is authorized and directed to forthwith trans- mit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the Tax Increment Districts for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. 7. Filing. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the development program and tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District with the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development. 8. Administration. The administration of Development District No. 1 is assigned to the City Manager who shall from time to time be granted such powers and duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the City Council may deem appropriate. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker & Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Bastian. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Keller Parkway (Kath) a. Floodplan Map Amendment (4 Votes) b. Variance - 13 - 9/28 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 2. Director of Community Development presented the specifics of the proposal. 3. Cynthia Kath, the applicant, spoke on behalf of her request. 4. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. 87 -9 -189 WHEREAS, Cynthia Kath initiated a rezoning to amend the August 5, 1986, Flood Insurance Rate Map from Zone A to Zone C for a portion of the following described property: Lot Six, Kohlman Division, except the northeasterly tri- angular part measuring 25 feet on the east line and 208.15 feet on the north line. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Com- mission on August 17, 1987. The Planning Commission recom- mended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 28, 1987, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present writ- ten statements. The Council also considered reports and recom- mendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is ade- quately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and con- veniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. - 14 - 9/28 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. The proposed filling within the 100 -year flood plain of Kohlman Lake will not obstruct flood flows. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 5. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LYAEW f WHEREAS, Cynthia Kath applied for a setback variance for the following- described property: Lot Six, Kohlman Division, except the northeasterly tri- angular part measuring 25 feet on the east line and 208.15 feet on the north line. WHEREAS, section 36- 566(c)(2)(b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum building setback of 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake ordinary high water mark; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 50 feet of setback, requiring a variance of 25 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on April'23, 1987. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commis- sion on August 17, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on September 28, 1987, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was pub- lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, because: - 15 - 9/28 a. The property cannot be put to a reasonable use under the conditions allowed by the official controls be- cause the property is too narrow to permit compliance. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to their property, not created by the land- owner. This property was created before a building setback was required from the lakeshore. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. If approved, the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality because: a. Eight existing dwellings are located less than 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake OHWM- -three of which have similar setbacks to that proposed. b. This is the last lot of record on this lake that cannot be put to a reasonable use if this setback requirement were to be strictly enforced. c. The vegetation located along the shoreline and on the northerly two - thirds of this property would not be disturbed during construction. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Noise Ordinance a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. City Attorney Kelly explained the proposed ordinance. c. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until the October 15, 1987 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Schedule Meeting, St. Paul Water Department a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to establish Monday, 7:00 P.M. to meet with the St. Paul Water Board at F Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Councilmember Bastian and Wasiluk Nays - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. Motion failed. 4. Assessment Ordinance - Second Reading a. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: - 16 - 9/28 ORDINANCE NO. 610 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO COLLECTING ASSESSMENTS The Council of the City of Maplewood does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 32 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended by adding the following: "Sec. 32 -18. PARTIAL PRE - PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT. Whenever any property owner desires to make partial pre - payment of any assessment to the City for improvement, such property owner has the right to make partial pre- payment of the assessment to the City Clerk at any time within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council." Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Land Use Legislation Study a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson explained the study. c. No action taken. 2. Estate Lot Rezonings a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson answered questions from the Council. c. No action taken. 3. Reschedule - October 5, Solid Waste Meeting a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to reschedule the October 5 Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. City Hall - H.V.A.C. Modifications a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize a budget transfer of $8,075.00 from the contingency account to install the following modifications to the City Hall H.V.A.C. System. - 17 - 9/28 1. Boiler Controls 2. Circulating Pump Controls 3. Modifications to dispatch room 4. Modifications to telephone /electrical room 5. Modifications to upstairs equipment room Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Highway 120 Development a. Councilmember Juker questioned where the storm water run -off was going to go from the Oakdale storm sewer project. b. Staff to investigate 2. Billboards a. Councilmember Bastian questioned why a billboard was placed on the golf course property at Beam and Highway 61 and now it is being dismantled. b. Staff to investigate. 3. Petition - 1897 Birmingham a. Councilmember Anderson stated he had received a petition from the neighbors of 1897 Birmingham requesting that the house be either brought up to code or be condemned. b. Council directed the Manager to instruct the health and building inspectors to inspect the dwelling. 4. 694 and County Road D a. Councilmember Anderson commented on the ramps at 694 and County Road D. L. ADMINISTRATION PRESENTATIONS 1. Planning Commission Appointment Procedures a. Commissioner George Rossbach explained the procedures. b. Councilmember Bastian Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. s and - 18 - 9/28 c. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Michael Avers and Albert Goins and Dave Whitcomb. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. M. ADJOURNMENT 9:36 P.M. City Cler — 19 — 9/28 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PARKS I DE FIRE STATION October 19, 1987 The meeting was called to order by Mayor John Greavu at '7 :00 p.m. Present were Mayor Greavu; Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Was.iluk; Cit y 9 y 9 Manager McGuire; City Engineer Haider; City Attorney Kelly; Chris Nicosia; President, St. Paul Water Board, Thomas Mogren; General Manager, St. Paul Water Utility; and Roger Mohror, Water Production Engineer. _ Mayor Greavu welcomed the residents and explained the purpose of the meeting, which was to review the neighborhood concerns regarding the St. Paul Water Board's Water Treatment Plant. Ken Haider, Maplewood Public Works Director reviewed the concerns of the nei 9 hborhood that had been expressed at two previous neighborhood meetings. Tom Mogren, General Manager of the St. Paul Water Uti 1 i ty, reviewed the planned for the future. ,Lime and discussed what was operation of the plant P re- calcifitratin 9, centrifuging centrifu in and filter presses were discussed as ways of reducing the 9 lime sludge. e. Mr. Mogren stated that filter presses have a potential of removing 90 to 95/ of the solids. He stated that Minneapolis is installing i filter presses and if it is successful he will recommend this to the Water Board. ' Mr. Mogren then addressed some of the concerns - Oust He stated that dust control was not as good as it should have been this year ear and assured the residents that it will improve in future years, even if they have to do it themselves. : Noise - The contractor may have been abusing the starting and stopping times This will be more closely monitored, Dama e - He requested that any claims for damage should be sent to the Water Utility in writing and they, in turn, w i l l forward it to the contractor. Unsi ghtl - They w i l l consider impruvi ng the looks of the site, i ncl udi n 9 the erection of a barrier - but only if the neighborhood wants it. Sylvan Avenue Concerns - He stated that he was aware of their concerns and would work to address them. He also stated that they are considering a settling pond across the street, He stated that this, if approved by the City, should alleviate the concerns. Questions "Is there a health hazard from the lime dust ?" Mr. Mogren stated none that he was aware of, however, the St Paul Health Department has agreed to study the potential hazards and he will * share their findings with the City. "How long before the f i 1 ter presses could be constructed ?" Approximately five years, "Why does Maplewood have to pay 20/ more for water ?" That is by contract, which is in the process of being renogiated. "Where would the filter presses be built ?" That has not been determined, but must likely at the current site. "Which contractor will the claims be sent to ?" The current one. "Will there be a mosquito problem if the new pond is built ?" Mr. Mogren said that he did not think so, but they would - consider it. "How long would the Minneapolis filter presses have to be observed ?" Probably about six months. , "How many yards of the lime are hauled each year ?" Approximately 60 trucks per day. Mrs. Carolyn Peterson presented the City Council with a petition signed by over 200 residents requesting suburban representation on the Water Board. "Why does the dirt storage area have to be located so close to the homes ?" The material is used for the dikes, but the location of the storage area - . wi i 1 be reviewed. "Why does the traffic have to go down Roselawn ?" It has shifted to County Road B now that the contractor has shifted to the north end. Kathy Juneman stated that she lives one and one -half miles away from the site and experiences the dust problem. Mayor Greavu thanked Mr. Mogren for coming out this evening and listening to our concerns. Mr. Chris Nicosia stated that he w i l l take this information and the concerns back to the full Board . State Representative Don Val ento stated that he would sponsor legislation that would give representation on the Water Board to the areas that are receiving service outside of the City of St. Paul . Councilmember Anderson asked how many acres west of the railroad tracks are they considering buying. Mr. Mogren stated a maximum of eight (8) acres. Councilmember Bastian asked why the P.C.A. shut down the pumping into Trout Brook. Mr. Mogren stated he did not know for sure. Mr. Bastian also asked if there were any advisory corimittees to the Water Board. Mr. Mogren stated that there were none. Mr. Bastian suggested that this should be considered. Mayor Greavu adjourned the meeting at 8:42 p.m. t E dorsea ...''� r-Wej eVtel.L. - �.- ..,... •`=�.0 tea. - . . • .. . • • .. MANUAL CHECKS _. .� . . _ ...-. �...►. ...• r• is... DATED THRU NOV. 30 � a- te- _Page �p1 �.lAi�.�sr.li- 7!•r.idi +.r.i.:a v.r.t�MsVir . A:..v^ .y... :.. . '. .. , t 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER - _ CHECK NO DAT AM OUNT VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION . 31OC14 12/01/87 900.00 CARROLL ANNE R CONTRACT PYM = 90.0.00 • ___ - -- - - - -- - - _ _._. _ _ _ _ 310M69 11/30/87 8,592.75- — - MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE �a 31OM69 11/30/87 418.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 31 OM6 9 - 1 1/30/87 573-00....__ — _..MINN STATE - TREASURER _ _ L I CENSE - 9,583.75 -- 310S59 " 12/01/87 154.02 STAPLES PAULINE PROGRAMS - -� -- - — - -- 154 - - 1 • J - 45.00 LABOR RELATIONS — � TRAVEL TRAINING 12/01/87 313632 �- 45.00 # _ 23 : .313 1 2 /0 1/87 —_ 144, 159.10 _ M . W . C . C . _ _ SEWER RENTAL _ �= 144,1159-10 Z3 =� 313MSS 12/01/87 59.90 3 M CO. EQUIPMENT 5 9.90 - -- - -- - 313M69 11/30/87 10,913:50 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE := 10,913.50 .. 3135.65 _ 1 2/01/87 1 • .750.00_.__ CITY OF_ PAUL _TRAVEL TRAININ _ 1,750.00 + � 314D24 11/30/87 256.00 DEPT NATL. RESOURSES LICENSE FILING F 314D24 11 /30/87 54. 00 _ _ _ _ DEPT NATL... RESOURSES _ LICENSE FILING F =� _ 314024 11/30/87 12.00 DEPT NATL. RESOURSES LICENSE FILING F »; 322.00 3G 31.4M69 _..__ 1 271 .0. .. _ __ _ _ MINN STATE TREASURER _ LICENSE .� 314M69 - 11 - /30/87 11/30/87 _ 607.50 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE : 3 111878.50 + - 314NS 11 /30/8 7 2 067.8 4 N U TILITIES —__ _ Page: 2 1967 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER C.HECK NO . __.DATE —. AMOUNT ___ __ _ _VENDOR _ —___ __ ____ _ _ITEM DESCRIPTION 314NSO 11/30/87 3.67 N.S.P. UTILITIES 314N80.._ -__ __11/30/87 _ _- - - --- -- 8.50 N.S.P. _ -- _ UTILITIES s 314N80 11/30/67 147.02 N.S.P. UTILITIES s 314N80 11/30/87 67.99 N.S.P. UTILITIES' 314NSO 11/30/87 --- -_ -_ -- 91.21 _.._. N. S. P. _ _ _ _ _- UTILITIES - --- • 314NSO - 11/30/87 _ 121.00 N.S.P. UTILITIES 314NSO 11/30/87 15.29 N.S.P. UTILITIES 314NSO .._ -- _A 1/30/87 5.45. -- -- . - - -_ S.P .— _ UTILITIES _ - 314NSO 11/30/87 21.68 N.S.P. UTILITIES 314N80 11/30/87 252.17 N.S.P. UTILITIES - 314N80 - 11/30/87 84 . 97 ---- - - ---- .__ N. S ..P ._ - 1-- - -- - -- ^-- UTILITIES - 314NSO _ - - - -- 11/30/87 -------- - - - -.- 27.76 N.S.P. UTILITIES - 314NSO 11/30/87 36.46 N.S.P. UTILITIES "- 314NSO -- - - - - - - -- _ 14.00 _ _._N.S.P. - -- -- -- UTILITIES - _ °- 314NSO _11/30/87 11/30/87 14.54 N.S.P. UTILITIES - 314NSO .11/30/87 804.87 N.S.P. UTILITIES _N.8 -P. ___ UTILITIES = 314NSO 11/30/87 276.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES = 4,230.47 z *ssss« 314S65 12/01/87 _ _ — — 201.00 _ _ _ST PAUL MED _ EXAMINTIOM _ = 201.00 314W70 12/01/87 197.04 WINFIELD POTTERS PROGRAMS = 1 97.04 + — - - -- ------- - - - - -- - -... ' 314Z10 12/01/87 150.00 ZAPPA JOSEPH AUCTION - 150.00 ' 3 _J L SHIELY_ — — - _ - _ - SUPPLIES - 316J32 12/01/87 10.88- J L SHIELY SUPPLIES 836.27 316M69 11/30/87 — __-.9.,557.50 _ _ MINN STATE TREASURER _ - _ LICENSE _ 316M69 11/30/87 _ 326.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE z 9, 88.3.50 * 316NSO 1 /30/87 _ 9.88 _ - - -__— N. S. P_ _ - UTILITIES _ -- - - 316NSO -__1 _._....._ 11/30/87 2.50. N.S.P. UTILITIES 316NSO 11/30/87 77.46 N.S.P. UTILITIES 316N80 1 1 /30/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 316N80 -_ - !1/30/•87 _ -- _ 2.50 _ N.8.P. — UTILITIES 316NSO 11/30/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES Page: 3 f r • yr ... -.! s'Y • --. r �: 4v« �. r+':.� .4& ftM.w• I. r.,a►.+ - .1 .yam+ �.::.4 . •._ �� ✓ 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD �.n��n e«va�•�� HECK NO . >-. - - - - -C .. _ _. DATE -- - - - - - AMOUNT _ ^ _ -_ VENDOR _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION 2 316NSO 11/30/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 316N80 11/30/67 _ _ . ___ _ 125.58 _ _:_ 96.74 - -- N. 8. P,____ - -- N.S.P. UTILITIES* UTILITIES 316N80 s 316N80 11/3.0/87 11/30/87 6.483.17 N.S.P. UTILITIES a 316N80 __ 11/30/87 _ _ 109.61 _ _ N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 316NSO 11r3o/87 127.65 125.-58 N.S.P. N.8.P. UTILITIES S 316NSO 316NSO 11/30/87 11/30/87 96.93 _ _.. N.S.P. - -=-- -- _. UTILITIES 316NSO _ - - 11/30/87 - - -- - - -- - - 133.22 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 316N80 - 11/30/87 97.07 65. 18 N.S.P. N 8 P ._ UTILITIES ____ - -- 316N80 316NSO .11/30/87 - 11 /30/87 - - -_ _ -- -_ .- -_r_.. 31.86 • • N.S.P. - UTILITIES 7,592.43 317M69 11/30/87 7 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE _ - 317M69 11/30/87 - ___ __ _ _ _ - 755.00 _ _ - MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 8.408.75 3 s 317N80 _ 11/30/87 - - - - 11 - -- - - - -_- _ 35.96 N.S.P. _ - -- __ -- - -_ UTILITIES UTILITIES - - - -_ 317 N 8 0 - --- /3 0 /87 8.47 5.45 N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES = 317N80 317N80 11/30/87 T - - - -- - N.S.P._ _ . - -- UTILITIES _ ._. = 317N80 _11/30/87 - -- 11/30/87 - -- - - - --- 6.29 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 317NSO 11/30/87 20.22 117.11 N.S.P. N.S.P. . UTILITIES _._317NSO 317N80 1 1/30/87 -__ _ 11/30/87 -- -__ -- 22.13. _ -- _- - - - -- _._ - - -- N.S.P. UTILITIES = 317N80 11/30/87 26.87 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES ' ' 317N80 - -- - -- -- .- 1 1 /30/87 -- - - - -.- -- ___ -- _._._._ 6 • g -._ 37.98 ... N.S.P. -_ -- N.S.P. UTILITIES - 317N80 317N80 1/30/87 11/30/87 192.84 N.S.P. UTILITIES . 317N80 - -' - 11/30/87 _- 6.83 _ N. S. P UTILITIES UTILITIES '- -- - 317NSO - 1 1/30/87 194.14 13.75 N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES 3 317N80 317NSO 11/30/87 6 8. 0 6 -- - - - -... N.S.P. ..,--- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - _.. UTILITIES . _ = 317N80 . _ .11/30/87 _ 11/30/87 . _. - - - - - - - -- ..._ ___ - -- 123.95 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 317N80 11/30/87 .75.55 12.15 N.S.P. N 8 P ' - - -- 317NSO - 317NSO - 11/30/87 ... 11/30/87 . -- - - - -- - -- _ _.- 30.97 ___ . . . -- - - -_,- __.______._- . - - -_- - -- N.S.P. NSP ..UTILITIES TILITIES - 317NSO 11/30/87 15.38 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 317.N80 157.93 _ - -- _ ._ . N.S.P. .. . - 1 , 258.01 317P95 11/30/87 80010.05 P.E.R.A. P/R DEDUCT DEDUCT 317P95 1 /30/87 - -- -- 10, 626.59 ----_ -- - - - -- -- -1 18,636.64 320630 12/01/87 85.00 BRIGHTNOSE TERRY PROGRAMS Page: 4 = 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE _ , _ __ _ . _- AMOUNT _ _ __VENDOR _y_ _�— ITEM DESCRIPTION -85.00 + 32063_ 3 /87 - - -- - - - _ _75.00 - _.__- __._...WEBER SANDRA - - _ - _ _._._... PROGRAMS • _._ _12/01 75.00 32 0 634 12/01/87_ _ _____ _129.67 _...__ _ . _- RAB I NE JANET _ _ �._ -P /R CK ___ __.•__ = X 320634 . 12/01/87 7.20 RABINE JANET P/R CK - 136.87 + = 320A05 1 1_/30/87 -'- -- --- .. - - -.._ 416.95 - - -_AF SCME - - - -- UNION DUES - - - 416.95 K 320C35 11/30/87 19,862.00 CTY CNTY EMP CREDIT UNION _ 19,862. 00 *- - - --- - -- -- - - -- - - - -- - - - _ _ _ - - -- - - =- -- - - 320I 15 11/30/87 -- + 3, 838.60 - - - ICMA - - - -- - - - -- DEFERRED COMP 320I15 11/30/87 1.811.31 ICMA DEFERRED COMP - -- --- - - - -- -- — - - - ---- - 5, 650.1 1_ '* - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - _ - -- --- - - ---- - -_ _ 32OL03 11/3.0/87 523.58 — LAW ENFORCEMENT P/R DEDUCT _ 523.58 + 320M15 5,113.07 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK P/R DEDUCT ____11/30/87 320M15 _ _ '*- 11/30/87 15,410.65 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK P/R DEDUCT - 320M15 11/30/87 337.50 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK SAV INGS BONDS SAVINGS — _11/30/87 _ �__. 5, 113.07 _ _ MAPLEW00D __3T - BANK P/R DEDUCT _ .320M15 25,974.29 - 320M18 11./30/87 20.00 METRO SUPERVISORY UNION DUES 20.00 320M61 1 1 /30/87 -- - - - - - - - - "^ -- 160. 00 - -- - - -- - MN MUTUAL LIFE INS - -- - - INSURANCE _ 160.00 • 3 11/30/87 7o561-06 _ _ MN_ ST_COMM /REVENUE P/R DEDUCT _ __320M65 _ __ Page: 5 1967 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK- NO . DATE . -T _- - - -- - - -- AMOUNT VENDOR_ _ITEM DESCRIPTION - 11/30/67 _ _._ ________.117.S _ MN ST RETIREMENT _...___ DEFERRED COMP DEFERRED COMP • 32OM68 11/30/87 78.47 MN ST RETIREMENT " 196.00.* -- 1 320M69 11/30/87 6, 228. TS -- - - MINN STATE TREASURER ___ 320M69 11/30/87 653.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE _ -- _ - - - -- - -6 881 ssssss - - - - -- - 321 M6 9 11/30/67 -- - -- - - 10 , 123.49 - MINN STATE TREASURER - LICENSE 321M69 11/30/87 661.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE - - - -- -- _ - - -- - _ _ _ -- - - _10 s - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - ssssss — 322E64 11%30/87 — 18000.00 _ EMP BENEFITS CLAIMS DENTAL CLAIMS - 1,000.00 ssssss - 3 • 322M60 12/01/87 _9.00_ - - -- _M.0 ^F.O.A_— - - -- -- T RAVEL TRAINING - -- _. - - -- 9.00 • s sssss —__ -- - - -- — ----- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - 322M69 11/30/87 8 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 32EM69 11 /30/87 _ 319.00. - -+ -- - MINN STATE TREASURER ---- - - - - -• - - LICENSE .- -- - - - - - - -- - -- - -- 8; 529.91 = 22N80 3 11/30/87 3,064.43 N.B.P .UTILITIES UTILITIES - 322N80 30 1 1//87 8.47 . -----. - -- -- - - - N . S. - - __ —_ - - - - -- - -- -- - -- - - - - - -- -- - - -._ . - - - - -- - s 3 + 072.9 0 ' 323C40 11/30/87 97.50 CLERK OF COURT CLERK OF COURT LICENSE FILING F LICENSE FILING F 323C40 11 /30/87 115.50 213.00 *... 323F5.0 12/01/87 381.30 FREBERC RONALD L VAC CHECK .30 • ♦sssis 11/30/87 - - � 5,065.00 - — MLNN STATE TREASURER -• LICENSE 3 323M69 11/30/87 276.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE — - - -- - -- - - - - -5 ' 341 .0 0 _ ! _ _- - - -- -- - -- -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - ssssss wwAt -r,w wlrw..Mn � +'.v..A �+�•R"..r•�- .+r/w.� w+r...• .+ . . - ..._....: ��, .�_..�_,.�._�..�......_......t . ._.. Page' 6 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR DESCRIPTION _ _ . _ _ -_ _ _. _ _ _ 30 -. 00 _. __ _.___ _. UN IV. OF_ MINNESOTA __..._ .---- .__TRAVEL TRAINING -� 5 30.00 324631 12/01/87 914.76 FOX 4 HOUNDS DINNER = - -- �324M20 - -- - - 12/01 /87 - -- - - - -_- M300-00 METRO WASTE CONTROL. - SAC PBL - 324M20 12/01/87 273.00 - METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC PBL =____ — _— c .__ - - - -- -- - -- - - - -- -2719 027.00 - ssss:: - 324M69 - 11/30/87 8,455.25 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE = 324M69 11/30/87 3,000.00- MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 324M69 . _ ._ _.__ 1.1/30/87- __.. _ -_ - _ 477.50 _ -_ _ -_. -MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 5,932.75 = 324N80 11/30/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 32 4N8 0 11/30/87 - — _ ._ -- - _..3.6 . -- -- - - -- N.S.P..__ _— -- -- - -- - _ UTILITIES _ . __ 324N80 _ __.. 11/30/87 .2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 3 324N80 11/30/87 494.34 N.S.P. UTILITIES _UTILITIES 324NSO 11/30/87 56.48 N.S.P. UTILITIES = 324N80 11/30/87 6.29 N.S.P. UTILITIES '..__— __324N80 _. _ --___11/30/87 _ _ _ 435.52 N. S.P, _ --_ — __ _ UTILITIES - 1,006.75 - ssss *s = 327C22 12/01/87 3.79 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX 327 C22 ! 2/ 01 /87 _ ._- ._...12.34 ._ COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX . ._ . -- 327C22 _ 12/01/87 22.99 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX 327C22 12/01/87 11.07 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX /87 9.81 , ___ __ _ COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX ____327C22 _ 327C22 _ -_ -12/01 12/01/87 __ 7.86 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX 327C22 12/01/87 12.74 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX 327C22..- 1 /87 ____ _ - -_ -- - -- .13 , 56. � _ __....COMMISSIONER . . COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX __ -. 327C22 -- -12/0 ____ - ----- 12/01/87 17.23 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX 32X22 12/01/87 9.88 COMMISSIONER REVENUE FUEL TAX 121 .27 •ssss: 327D24 11/30/87 3.00 DEPT NATL RESOURSES LICENSE FILING FE 327D24 11/30/87 90.00 DEPT NATL.RESOURSES LICENSE FILING FE 327D24 1 1 /30/87 _ 156.00 _ ___DEPT NATL RESOUR SES LICENSE FILING FE 249.00 . - • . - _ _ .....�. r , wr..I�..+. 1.• +a .'� ��. M �ti'�•�f -' - -- A �.' Page: 7 1987 CITY OF.MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO . r -- -DATE _ _ - _. AMOUNT ,_ ! VENDOR _____I_TEM DESCRIPTION 327M69 0/87_ ____.8, 127.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 327M69 -1-1 .. _ 11/30/87 339.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 8.466.00 • 3 327P95 - -__ 11/30/87 - - - - -- - - - -- - -- 45.00 _ -- - -- P E . R. A . . . - - -- - P/R DEDUCT - _ _ _ 45.00 • = s *•s•* 328635 12/01/87 1,622.50 SOFTWARE CLEARING SOFTWARE 1 s 0 - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - 328M69 12/01/87 - 10.466.45_ MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 328M69 12/01/87 297.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE - ..... .... 329C40 - - -- - 12%01 /87 -- ---- - - - - -- -- —_ - -- - 65.0 0 —. _- CLERK OF COURT - - - - -- __ FILING FEE - - -- - _ 65.00 • _ 329 M6 9 12/01/67 11,392.46 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE _ — _ _ 329M69 _ _ - 12/01/87 _ _ 243.00 _ MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 11,635.46 • 329P95 12/01/87 7,930.74 P.E.R.A. PERA PBL -- 329P95 -- 12/01/87 - - - y - � - - - � - 77 - - - -• - PERA PERA PBL 18,466.51 • 334AOS 12/01/87 416.95 AFSCME UNION DUES 3 334C35 12/01/87 20,324.00 CTY CNTY EMP CR UN CREDIT UNION - M324.00 *. -- - -- - - -- -- _ - - - -- - __ - - - -- -- - - - -- -- = 334115 3 ICMA - DEFERRED COMP 12/01/87 334115 12/01/87 1,788.23 ICMA DEFERRED-COMP 5, 410.33 • _ - --- -- - ---- - -_ --- -- _ _ Page: 8 1987 CITY CHECK REGISTER OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK NO . DATE _ ___ . _. AMOUNT VENDOR_ _ _ _, _.._ .... __._._..ITEM DESCRIPTION '. _ 334M15 �_ 12/01 /87 5.430.37 _._. _ _ MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL FWT PBL 334M15 12/01/87 15,631.56 5,430-37 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL 334MI5 12/01/87 26,492.30 s �tsss = 334M18 - 12/01/87 18.00 — METRO SUPERVISORY P/R DEDUCT 18.00 = 334M35 - ._...____ /87 _ -_ _._. _.___._ _ _ 31 1..70 _MN BENEFIT ASSOC _._CONTRACT PYM _ - 31 1 .70 • 334M61 12/01487 / 1/87 160..00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE 160.00 _.. 334M65 - - - - 12/01/87 -- - - - - -- - 7, 632.33 - - - -- - -- - � - MN ST COMM /REVENUE - - SWT PBL . 7,632.33 � a 334M68 � _ 12/01/87 _ 66.7b _ _ _ MN ST RETIREMENT MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP DEFERRED COMP 334M68 T 12/01/87 69.24 136.00 334M69 12/01 /87 9 MINN STATE TREASURER MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE LICENSE • 334M69 12/01/87 516.00 10, 345.69 * --- - -. _- - - - - -- - - . - - 334N27 12/01/87 2,789.00. - - - -` NCR CONTRACT PYM CONTRACT PYM 334N27 12/01/87 7,519.00 NCR NCR CONTRACT PYM - 334N27 12/01 /8T __ - -- - - 1 8 020. 0O .. -�._. - - - -- - - - _ _ - - - 1 1 , 328.00 � ., 334W2S / 1/87 12/0 153,18 WISC DEPT REVENUE SWT PBL 153.18 . #wssss 30 0 038.84 FUND 01 TOTAL - . . _ - ' _ _ GENERAL - -- - - -- - - , __ - -_ 1,498.23 _. _ FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHARGE 12,950.50 FUND 13 TOTAL FUND 90 TOTAL C.I.P. SEWER F� SANITARY - 146,046.13 10000.00 _ ___ __ _ FUND 94 TOTAL DENTAL SELF-INSU 35,453.05 FUND 95 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT Page:9 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER -.- CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _______ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 121.27 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE a EQUIP ! L 497,108.02 TOTAL RF S TN T-.- .L�A�T_�.�L __MF�ETTT�G_. t . .. _ .� . ,� ... ...,� ...�.+. -w..s� ••r-�w•..� . �...M rr• v- ►tirwr�ar �.•av r�.«aw.iv.•.� r .• - - - Page: 1 Ar - . .- . .. _... � .. .. �- .. �y r•++ .•.•rr. � •.r. .sue ._ -.� • �..�- _ - 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER - CHECK NO.,_. DATE _ __ ________._AMOUNT „__ VENDOR_. ITEM DESCRIPTION • = 48022 3 12/03/87 29.11 MEEHAN JAMES TRAVEL TRAINING s _ .. __ - -- ------- - - ---- -- --- --_ --89.21 * •_ ___ - --- -- ____ - ___- ___ - - 348028 - - - -- - - - -- 12/03/87 — 180.00 - - - - -- - - - — CHICAGO LEASE _ 180.00 - - -- - - -- - - 348029 - - ` - - jg7 12/03 15.0 0 FREDR I CK DAVID DAVID - - -- - MA I NT VEH MAINT VEH ' 348029 12/03/87 15.00- FREDRICK goo *ss *ss 348042 1 2 / 03/87 — 227.86 - PEOPLES ELECTRIC CONTRACT PYM 227.86 348 046 _ 12/03/87 _ 424.64 _.._ _ GOODYEAR _ __ REPAIR VEH REPAIR VEH 348046 12/03/87 782.41 116.58 GOODYEAR GOODYEAR REPAIR VEH - = 348046 12/03/87 _ 1,323.63 * — = *sssss 348157 ~� 12/03/87 - _ — 5.11 ^ u SZCZEPAUSKI THOMAS J TRAVEL TRAININ 3 5.11 = 34817 0 12/ 03/87 _._._ . . _ ____ _ _ 35.52 AMERICANA I NN _ -.TRAVEL. TRAINING 35.52 3 4 8 403 12/03/87 115.00 P.C.SOLUTIONS CONTRACT PYM CONTRACT PYM _- 348403 . 12/03/87 _ 140.00 _. 105.50 __P • C • SOLUTIONS_ P.C.SOLUTIONS CONTRACT PYM = 348403 12/03/87 .. 360.50 •= -348428. 12/ 03/87 _ _ —___ 21.00 _ _ ATTITUDE DEVLEOPMENT__ TRAVEL TRAINING_ . 21.00 • - - 348440 12/03/87 87.00 FLOWER AFFAIR SUPPLIES .. 87.00 _- - 4 65 - _ _ - - -- 34846S_ -- - 12%03/87 • � - -- - � i - 0 . 00____ -•- - FISHER LYNE FISHER LYNE - SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 348465 12/03/87 10.00 Page: 2 1987 CITY 12/03/87 _ ________ _11.7s 891 , 05 _ _. _ . M I NN- KOTA__ EXCAVATI _.__ CONTRACT OF MAPLEWOOD q CHECK REGISTER 117,891.05 - _ -- - CHECK NO. DATE _ _ -- AMOUNT_._ _.._ VENDOR -ITEM DESCRIPTION f 20.00 • 348638 12/03/87 15.00 A BETTER PHONE CTR REPAIR S . - -. 15.0 0 . •...... - - - - -- 348495 _- 12/03/87 __ _____ ___ 0.00 ._______ -- BUSINESS RECORDS. INC__- __ SUPPLIES _ 5 ACCOUNTEMPS INC 1,610.00 PYM 12/03/87 _ 192.20 _ ACCOUNTEMPS IN -- C ONTRA CT PY M 691.30 348508 12/03/87 3.68 MIKISKA WILLIAM TRAVEL TRAINING 348508 12/03/87 _- -10.60 -- MIKISKA.. WILLIAM__ IAM__ __ TR.AVEL. TRAINING - - 42.00 14.28 • , 12/03 -- - - - -- _ 235.00 C -MATIC REPAI 348511 %� 12/03/87 91.00 RYDER TRANS TRAVEL TRAINING -- - -- -- - — 9 1- 00_0 DIESEL_ -INJECTION __ -- SUPPLIES__ == s♦ *� #s 155.14 - 348513 12/03/87 16.69 CONNERS U KIM MILEAGE PYM 348643 16.69 • 2,330.66 _ EDEN SYSTEMS INC. _ CONTRACT PYM. 4,130.66 34853o __ _ _ __ 12/03/87 _ ________ _11.7s 891 , 05 _ _. _ . M I NN- KOTA__ EXCAVATI _.__ CONTRACT . PYM q 117,891.05 - sss��• 348638 12/03/87 15.00 A BETTER PHONE CTR REPAIR - - - - -. 15.0 0 . •...... - - - - -- -- - — _ - '' 348639 12/03/87 499.10 ACCOUNTEMPS INC CONTRACT PYM 12/03/87 _ 192.20 _ ACCOUNTEMPS IN -- C ONTRA CT PY M 691.30 • _.. __ __348640_._ -_.12/03/87___ ___42. _ ANDERSON .._JOYCE ._ i REFUND 42.00 • ' 348641 -- - - 12/03 -- - - - -- _ 235.00 C -MATIC REPAI 235.00 -- -- - - -- . DIESEL_ -INJECTION __ -- SUPPLIES__ 155.14 348643 _ 12/03/87 1 * Soo 00 EDEN SYSTEMS INC ._ _ CONTRACT PYM 348643 12/03/87 2,330.66 _ EDEN SYSTEMS INC. _ CONTRACT PYM. 4,130.66 + _ 348644 .12/03/87 21.00 JENSEN VELMA REFUND 21.00 _ 348645 12/03/87 29.95 JEM8 MEMBERSHIP 29.95 • Page: 3 1987 CITY OF . MAPLEWOOD CHECK NO. DATE _ _ AM _._.- __ AM OUNT-- VENDOR _ — - - — _LTEM DESCRIPTION - 348646 - - - _2/03/87 - - - --- -- _ 3 58.00. _ - ___. -_ JOHNSON.. WELL_ _ CONTRACT PYM 358.00 * _ - 348647 12/03!87_ _ -- 21 .00 ---- _.._ -_ _ J OURNAL _DIVISION -__. -- _. - —. MEMBERSHIP 21 .00 348648 -- 12/03/87 . -- — f 0.0 0 __. -- - - _ — KUEHN ROSE MAR. I E -- REFUND := 10.00 _ 348649 12/03/87 - 10.00_ LUXEM PAUL _ REFUND - 10.00 1 .L = 346650 �• 12/ 03/87 _ _- -- - - - - -- -- - 130.35 _ -__ _ _____.MAPLE HILLS GOLF ___- ____ MAPLE HILLS GOLF -- PROGRAMS PROGRAMS 348650 12/03/87 50.00 - 180.35 * - -- "- 348651 - - - 12/03/87 6 460.00 o MIDWESTERN MACH CONTRACT PYM 6,460.00 - 348652 12/03/87 360 . QO - - -- MICF STILLWATER - -_ MCF STILLWATER - SUPPLIES SUPPLIES = 348652 12/03/87 7.50- _ 352.5 0 - -- — — --- —_ - -- --— - 348653 12/03/67 117.00 MN PREVENTION RESRCE SUPPLIES - 117.00. !�.. - - - --- - -- - - - -- - - - -__ - -- -- _ 348654 12/03/87 10.00 MORGAN ARLENE REFUND 10.04 -* - - -- - - - -- - — - -- - -- _ _ _ - - 348655 12/03/87 76.65 MPLS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 76.65..* ...... - 348656 12/03/87 17.84 PALMA STEVEN T TRAVEL TRAINING 17.84 - -- - - - 348657 � 12/03/87 3 13,.26 PANSECRAU EDWARD ADVERTISING _ 313.26. ! 348658 12/03/87 10.00 RUSINAK BARBARA REFUND - - - -- -1.0. 0 0 - - —_ _ - 348659 - - -- -- - - - - 12/03 /8T -- -- 497.30 SEWER EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR MAINT 497.30 !! .. __------ - --- -- -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - 348660 12/03/87 24.00 SUNQUIST WENDY SUPPLIES - 24.00 - _ - 34866 f f 2! 03/87 225.00 SYMPLEX SOFTWARE CONTRACT PYM • - ! — - 348662 12/03/87 12.00 WASH - CAPITAL NEWS MEMBERSHIP _ -i 2 ' Q r 348663 N 12/03/87 375.00 KRAUS ANDERSON REFUND SURTAX _� —:_ •••w•s Page: 4 348B11 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BANICK JOHN CHECK REGISTER �__ ._____ _ CHECK NO.- DATE __ �. _ — AMOUNT _._ _ _____._._:__ _ _ - VENDOR __ _ _____ —___ I TEM DESCRIPTION 375.00 • 348664 12/03/87 325.00 r PROGRAMS CONTINUING TRAVEL TRAINING . 12/03/87 35.08 325.00 • SUPPLIES VEH - 12/03/67 29.84 BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEH ' 348A15 __._A2/03/87 _ ._.. _____ _____L54. 65 _ _ AEC ENGINEERS - -.- _CONTRACT PYM 254.85 • 348BSS 12/03/87 56.85 !� BLACKS PHOTO 34GA69 12/03/87 191.35 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR VEH 34SA69 __. I2/03/87_..____ ...,___ 340.10 _ __ ___ _ ARNALS AUTO SERV.-.----..---- REPAIR VEH 348A69 12/03/87 255.84 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR VEH 34SA69 12/03/87 453.61 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR VEH .._- 348A69 __..___.12/03/87 , —i 119.65 ARNALS AUTO SERV _ REPAIR VEH 1.360..55 • 34BA81 12/03/87 70.99 ARNOLD DAVID UNIFORMS - 70.99 • •ss••• ' 348A84 12/03/87 + 2.80 _ -_ -� - —_ AMERICAN TOOL SUPPLIES -- _- -- . —..__ ' 2.80 • _- 348B05 12/03/87 _. 4.941 .25 _ BANNIGAN6KELLY P.A. _ _ CONTRACT PYM ' 348B05 12/03/87 253.13 BANNIGAN&KELLY P.A. CONTRACT PYM ' 348805 12/03/87 168.75 BANNIGAN&KELLY P.A. CONTRACT PYM 348B05 - 12/03/87 - -- . . _. 135.00 BANNIGAN&KELLY P.A _.... CONTRACT PYM ------ - - - - -- . •____ 5.498.13 •••w•s 348B11 12/03/87 35.00 BANICK JOHN CANINE ALLOWANCE 35 • ;. 348B15 . 12/03/87 35.08 BATTERY TIRE WH8E SUPPLIES VEH 348B15 12/03/67 29.84 BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES VEH ' 64.92 • ••�sss 348BSS 12/03/87 56.85 !� BLACKS PHOTO SUPPLIES ~~ 56.85 • _.. 34BB94 _________ _12/03/87___ _. _ 34.54._-.. __ BUILDERS_0_ _ _+ SUPPLIES_ _ Page: 5 J 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE _ _ _ NT AMOUNT _ ._ _ _VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION - 340B94 12/03/87 19.18 BUILDERS 0 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 3 - - -- -- ..12/03/87 - - - -- - - - -- --- .18.12 - - - - -- BUILDERS a___. ----- - - - .348B94 71.84 + 348C33 12/03/87 64.85 CAPITOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 64 . ' 111111 348C39 - - -- - - -- - - -- - 12/03/87 _ � - GEMSTONE PRODUCTS - -- - -- - GEMSTONE PRODUCTS - SUPPLIES - -- -~ - - -- . SUPPLIES - 348C39 348C39 ._..__._12/03/87._ 12/03/87 __ 3.78 - 171 .9T _ -__ __- _GEMSTONE PRODUCTS -. _ _ 8UPPLIES_ - -_ 341.82 • 1: =- 348C45 12/03/87 123.33 CHIPPEWA SPRINGS IPPEWA SPRINGS WATER 348C45 ___ ._.12/ 03/87 -- 25.26- ._ ---__ _..- CH- _WATER -- _ 98.07 + - 348 CSS 12/03/87 239.31 COPY DUPLICATING DUPLICATING -- - - -- -- - - -- =-- - -- - - - - - -- __ 239.31..-P- - - -- - -- - - - - -- :, +ttss* 348C58 12/03 X87 — 64.13 - COPY EQUIPMENT INC -- SUPPLIES -- - : 64.13 + °- - - -- . 9 3 48C5 I50.00 - - -- - CORPORATE RISK MGM - - -- CONCULTING FEES 150.00 + -- 348 C67 12/03/87_._ - -_ -_ -- .___.__ -- _149.76 _- _ -_ _ CHAP IN N PUBL I SH I NC _ PUBLI - 3: ._ 34SC95 12/03/87 9.85 CODE LARRY CUDE LARRY SUPPLIES TRAVEL TRAINING 348C95 -. _ 12/03/87 _ - __ __ 3 •_08- _ _ 118.45 . _. _ CODE LARRY TRAVEL TRAINING s- 348C9 5 34SC95 12/03/87 12/03/87 43.31 CUDE LARRY TRAVEL TRAINING TRAVEL TRAINING =` 348C95 - -- - - - -- 96.72 _ _ _CUDE LARRY — - -- - - -- - 2 b 5.25 + -' 34SD20 12/03/67 - or DAVI8 ECTRONIC SUPPLIES — = 0 -0- - - ttssts - Page: 6 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER - __ _ . CHECK NO. DATE __._.._____ __ AMOUNT ..._-- _...____- - VENDOR _ -_ITEM DESCRIPTION - .. - - -- 12/03/87 ____._ - -- _.___ 8.00- _____.. __.. DALCO SUPPLIES 348D30 12/03/87 159.79 DALCO SUPPLIES s' 34SD30 12/03/87 184.31 DALCO SUPPLIES 34SD30 __.. 12/03/87 __..- _.__ -____ 35.65 ________ DALCO SUPPLIES 348D30 12/03/87 173.46 DALCO SUPPLIES 645.21 34SD35 ___.__12/03/87. 12/03/87. __ -556. 00 - .. -_ -._. - DALEY_.PA CONTRACT PYM - 556.00 34SD37 12/03/8 7 42.11 DATA DISPATCHING SUPPLIES .- _ - --- ----- - - - - -- - - -- -42.1 1, - - - -- ^. ___. -_ _. - . -- -- -- - - -- :: sswss� - 348D69 12/03/87 35.65 DONS PAINT BODY SUPPLIES - = 35.65 348E 15 _ .1?-/03/87- - - 42.79 . ___ r__.__ .. EAST .4 $ I DE._ _C . L. C _ ..SUPPLIES-.--. . 42.79 34SE70 12/03/87 21.90 ENRICA FISH MED SUPPLIES 21 .90 _lp -- t - *�s�s• 348045 12/03/87 - GOODYEAR TIRE CO - REPAIR ^ MAINT 5.00 - 5.00 2 348657 12/03/87 _. .- -- 429.00 GRACE DUANE C ONTRACT PYM_ .. . _ . _ 429.00 '! 348068 12/03/87 413.50 GOLDEN VALLEY CONTRACT PYM 413-50 * - -- - - - -- - - 34SH13 12/03/87 851.71 HALE CO SUPPLIES 851.71 • _ __ .348H16 .__ y__.._12/03/87- -__ _173.7 HARMON. CLASS - CONTRACT PYM .._____ a �-_ �,..._.. L>N�_CY o., . Page: 7 1987 CITY OF MAPLEW00D CHECK REGISTER - - - - -CA CHECK NO._ DATE. .AMOUNT _ VENDOR _ ._ _ITEM DESCRIPTION = 34SL70 12/03/87 173.71 • LOGIS CONTRACT PYM *s�sss •__ 1 776-33 ____. --- - - . _ _ - -- - -- - - - -- __ _ - 348H 19 __12403/87 273.95 _ -- - - -_ -- _ -HANDY - HITCH. WELD INC . ___ ! ._EQU I PMENT 348M14 12/03/87 -- 273.95 • - - MA PLE W OOD REVIEW -- - PUBLISHING -+ - 34SM14 12/03/87 30.09 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING - 34SH29 12/03/67 79.00 HEALTH RESOURCES CONTRACT PYM = 79.00 * - -- -- - - - = _ 34SH70 - 12/03/87 .44.04. HORSNELL JUDITH MILEAGE - E - 44.04 • - 348J01 12/03/87 _183.00. _ ._.._ ..___J. D. M. MAINT - -- SUPPLIES -- 348J01 _ -- _-- .---- 12/03/87 ..____ -- 183.00 J.D.M. MAINT SUPPLIES - 366.00 _ - ••s *�s 34SJ35 _ 12/ 03/87--- __ -_ -- -.__ -- 133.50 __ -- - _ _ _. JI M HATCH _.SALES..__ _ _ __ —_ -- SUPPL I ES - -- -- _ - 133.50 348J45 12/03/87 12.40 JOLLY SUPPLIES ___- -- -- - - -- - - -- - — - -- - - - - -- - - -12.4 0 P - - - ... - - -- - — -- -- -- - --- - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - = 348L30 12/03/87 — -- 1,180.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES CONTRACT PYM - 1 • 34SL31 _ +12/03/87r - 80.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 800KS 80.00 • �-_ �,..._.. L>N�_CY o., . LLOWANCE 34SL33 12/ 7 - - - - -CA = 34SL70 12/03/87 1,776.33 LOGIS CONTRACT PYM •__ 1 776-33 ____. --- - - . _ _ - -- - -- - - - -- __ _ - 348M14 12/03/87 -- ---" - -- ' 40. 1 L -...._ - - MA PLE W OOD REVIEW -- - PUBLISHING -+ - 34SM14 12/03/87 30.09 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING Page: 8 0 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. _ DATE.__ .—__ _ .AMOUNT_-___ _ _VENDO ITEM DESCR I PT I Oh =. 3 70.81 •. i�r�fM 348Ml25 _._1-2/. 03/87 , MI CHAEL. _TRAVEL TRAINING. ' 729.86 • lo t 34SM31 12/03/87 252.68 MANPOWER TEMP TEMP WAGES ._ _. 348M31 __ _ __.- 1 2/03/87___._ - ____.__MANPOWER TEMP ___TEMP WAGES _ - 505.36 • ''. 34SM48 12/03/87 1,453.20 METRO INSP SERVICE CONTRACT PYM =- •�ss�* - 34SMSS 12/03/87 113.20 a MPLS STAR 6 TRUBUNE r PUBLISHING 113-20 • 348M94 _._ _ 12/03/87 ______— __ _.49.00 _. _..__ .. _. M. R. SIGH______ __ SUPPLIES 348M94 12/03/87 425.70 M.R.SIGN SUPPLIES 9 474.70 348N27___. __ 12/03/8.7_.___ _____796.00_.. _ _..._._ NCR CORP — _ _._ CONTRACT PYM____ 796.00 �ss•ss _ - 34SN30 12/03/87 128.10 NORTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 34SN30 ___ _____ _ 1.2/ 03/87 __..._ _ �_.____.__. 1� 207_.64 _ ____.___._ _ NORTH ST PAUL CITY____._,__ ; 34SN30 12/03/87 66.00 NORTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 1,401.74 • 12/03/87 _ ._ _ _.1 .45 NORTHWESTERN BELL_ _ TELEPHONE. __348N50 •j �_ 340NSO 12/03/87 52.53 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 1 34SN50 12/03/87 102.05 NORTHWESTERN BELL- TELEPHONE _ 57 NORTHWESTERN BELL--- TELEPHONE ._348N50 -.-.-.12/03/87 348NSO 12/03/87 ___ _.___ 1,671.12 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 34SN50 12/03/87 38.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 34SN50 _ _ 12/03/87__ — _______ 53.23. BELL_;__ __. _ TELEPHONE 348N50 12/03/87 38.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 348N50 12/03/87 38.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 348N50._ 12/03/87_- 1 • 071 .60 ,� _ NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE_ - 348N50 _ _ 12/03/87 19.50 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 348NSO 12/03/87 270.02 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 0 Page: 9 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER NT V ENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION_ CHECK NO. DATE 348NSO 12/03/87 53.23 NORTHWESTERN BELL BELL TELEPHONE 3 348N50 __ _- 12/03/87 38.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL _..TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 348N50 348NSO 12/03/87 12/03/87 51.03 NORTHWESTERN BELL 4 TELEPHONE a 348NSO 12/03/87 __._._ 51 .03 _ NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN BELL _ BELL _ _ TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 348NSO s 348NSO 12/03/87 12/.03/87 51.03 .51.03 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 348N50 -49.67 .. -. __.._NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN. BELL. BELL TELEPHONE 340NSO . 348N50 12/03/87 12/03/87 17.76 51.03 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 348N 50 N ORTHWESTERN 113.08 _ NORTHWESTERN BELL_ _ __ __ BELL __ _ TELEPHONE TELEPHONE = 348N 34SN50 12/03/87 12/03/87 53.60 81.80 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE __. 5 0 _ 348NSO _ .__12/ 56.45. _ _ _ _ NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN BELL. ._ ____TELEPHONE BELL TELEPHONE 348N ' 348N50 12/03/87 12/03/87 38.60 67.95 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE -__ 348N50 _ 12/03/87_ _ __ 89.05 _NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN BELL BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE - 348NSO 12/03/87 53.23 _ 4 .348N80 12/03/87 -__ _ 9.56 _ N. S_. P. _ UTILITIES UTILITIES - 348N80 _ 12/03/87 41.86 2.807.62 N.S.P. N.B.P. UTILITIES 34SN80 348N80 _. - 12/03/87 - - - -- 12 _---------- - - - -.. ; _ 463.5b _... - - -- - - - - -_. N. 8. P .------- - - - - -- _ __ __- UTILITIES - - -- - UTILITIES - - - -- 3 48N80 12/03/87 463.56 3.67 N.S.P. N.B.P. UTILITIES 348NOO 12/03/87 N 8 . P .__ UTILITIES _ _ 34SN80 3 48N80 12/ 03/87 .._ 12/03/87 _2.50 _ _ - - - -- 2.50 __ . N.S.P. - -- UTILITIES = 34SN80 12/03/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES = 34SN80 _ _ __ 12/03/.87 - - -- - -- 3.67 - - - 2.50 - -- N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES 34.SN80 348N80 12/03/87 12/03/87 100.77 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES _ 348N80 12/03/87 228.91_ _ 103.35 _ _ N.S.P. N.B.P. - -- - UTILITIES 348N80 = 348N80 12/03/87 12/03/87 74.74 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 12/03/87_ - -- - _.W91_.OS_.._ 125.11 --- .�._N..8.P N.S.P. - - -_ -. -- UTILITIES 348N80 ' 34SN80 .12/03/87 12/03/87 6,340.41 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES -- 348N80 - - 12/03/87 93.63________ 91.51 _N.S.P. N.S.P. _ UTILITIES - 348N80 34SN80 12/03/87 !2/03/87 29.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 348N80 • 12/03/87 _ _ _ - - -- __. _ 65.71. _ _ ___ N. S. P . - - - - - --UTILITIES UTILITIES s ^ 348N80 12/03/87 67.92 70.55 N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES 348N80 34SN80 12/03/87 12/03/87 - _ _- 44.12- -_.__. ___. N.S.P. �� UTILITIES - ! - UTILITIES -_ 348N80 -_- . 12/03/87 40.70 6.21 N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES 348N80 = 348N80 !2/03/87 _ 12/03/87 - - - -- - __ -_ _ 13.04 - - _ -- - N. S. P.._ _ _ _..- UTILITIES UTILITIES - - .. ___ = 48N80 3 _ 12/03/87 33.94 11.03 N.S.P. N.S.P.. UTILITIES 3 34SN80 348N80 12/03/87 12/03/87_ 6 N .. S. • P . __. UTILITIES _ _ -� - 34SN80 _ 12/03/87 -r - _ f 5.45 N. 8 • P • UTILITIES UTILITIES 34SN80 12/03/87 15.81 N.S.P. Page: 10 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER �- _CHECK N0._ DATE AMOUNT ____ _VENDOR_ -_ .ITEM DESCRIPTION '. 348N80 12/03/87 29.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES _3 -_ - 348N80 _- - -• - - -- 12/03!87 _- __- -._- 36.03 ...- ._ . 136.48 �__- N.8.P N.S.P. UTILITIES ' 348N80 34SN80 12/03/87 12/03/87 92.66 N.S.P. UTILITIES .- s 348N80 _ _� 2/03/87 _ 3T • 31 -. --- _ ^...N • 8 •P __UTILITIES -_ - -- UTILITIES ' 3 348N80 12/03/87 20.57 25.38 N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES .4 348N80 348N80 12!03/87 !P/03/8T _____..__- 6.65 _ __.___ H.B.p UTILITIES - = _ __ 348N80 __ 12/03/87 767.62 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES 348NSO 12/03/87 149.48 70.93 N.S.P. S P._ - -- UT I L I T I E8 -- - - UTILITIES `_ `- 340NS 0 348N80 12/ 03/87_. _ -- 12/03/87 . _ -. -..._- 28.84 -.N . . N .S.P. UTILITIES 348N80 12/03/87 78.37 N.S.P. UTILITIES UTILITIES.-------- _`._- 's __.348N80 --- -_ -_ -- 12/03/87.. _ 1.08 _ --- 199.90 _i__H.B.P - -- N.S.P. UTILITIES . '' 348N80 348N80 12/03/87. 12/03/87 249.48 _ N.S.P. UTILITIES e _. -- 348N80 _._..__ -1 c/03/8T_.. __ _ __ 12. _ N. S . P . UTILITIES -- -___ -- UTILITIES 348N80 12/03/87 63.02 b3.0E 93.92 N.S.P. N.S.P. UTILITIES -= �. -- 348N80 _348N8 0 12/03/87 _ UTILITIES. _ _-- =- 23 13.744.58 348029 12/03/87 20.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH CAR WASH MAINT VEH . MAINT VEH `- ='. 348029 348029 12/03/87 __.15.00 _ _._ 130.00 _-OCTOPUS _ OCTOPUS CAR WASH MAINT VEH = 348029 12/03/87 35.00 00.. OCTOPUS CAR WASH CAR WASH MAINT VEH MAINT VEH _ 348029 348029 12/03/87 - 1.2/03/87 . -__15. __ - 220.00- -.- _..__.00TOPUS OCTOPUS CAR WASH MAINT VE =� 348029 12/03/87 5.00 2 OCTOPUS CAR WASH OCTOPUS CAR_. WASH MAINT VEH _ MA I NT VEH '3 .348029 _ 12/ 03/87 - ____________- _._ _._ __. _ _ -._ 3i 220.00 • 34SPOS 12/03/87 162.38 PALEN KIMBALL CO REPAIR MAINT - 34SP30 PETERSON HELL CONV RETAINER 12/03/87 3.000.00 •- 34SP30 12/03/87 103.27 PETERSON BELL CONV RETAINER _� - ----- -- - - - - -- - -3.� 103.27._ *.....----------- ---- -- - - -� - - -- r.__r ;6 .�_ - - - - -- ------ 171 -° 348 P40 12/03/87 43.86 PHOTOS TO CO SUPPLIES ._ 43.86 348P41 _ !2/03/87 - 198.00 r - -!_ - - � -- PIONEER RIM SUPPLIES 198.00 • - fps *w• - ' __.348P45_ ._._., 2/03/87 _ _6,.00. PITNEY BOWES LEASE __ Page : 11 1987 CITY i OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.. DATE..__- AMOUNT VENDOR_ _ITEM DESCRIPTION - - RESCUE 66.00 + REPAIR MAINT - 348R49 �sM�ss _.________ 21.85 ROAD RESCUE . 1 2/03/87_ 12.00 PRIEBE WILLIAM SUPPLIES - ,_.34SP65 z 12.00 • 34SR49 12/03/87 43.47 -_ . RESCUE _ - SUPPLIES 348R49 ' 34SP67 12/03/87 85.50 PROFESSIONAL PROCESS AMB BILLING • = == 85.50 � _ - - -- -- -- - - - - -- - --- - - - - -- - -- = 34SR09 12/03/87 111.64 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 34SR09 12/03/87 589.32 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM - SUPPLIES 700.96 * 12/03/87 - --- _ SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES = 348SO3 12/03/87 75.52 348R47 12/03/87 37.20 ROADRUNNER CONTRACT PYM - _108.13_ - 37.20 OFFICE . PROD_ -_ 34SR49 12/03/87 79.01 . ROAD RESCUE REPAIR MAINT - 348R49 12/03/87 _.________ 21.85 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR MAINT -= 34SR49 12/03/87 27.90 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR MAINT 34SR49 12/03/87 43.47 -_ . RESCUE _ - SUPPLIES 348R49 _ 12/03/87 __ __ ___ 518.00 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES == 603.29 348SO3 12/03/87 30.00 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348SO3 12/03/87 _ _ 19.54 _ SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES = 348SO3 12/03/87 75.52 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348S03 12/03/87. _108.13_ - _ SPS OFFICE . PROD_ -_ , __ SUPPLIES. .. __ 348SO3 12/03/87 _ 25.68 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES •' 348SO3 12/03/87 111.00 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348503 12/03/87 14.28 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES . ______ __ _ = 348SO3 _ 12/03/87 _ _ _ _ 25.28 _ SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES - 348SO3 12/03/87 30.00 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348SO3 12/03/87 _r__ .... SPS OFFICE PROD =; 348SO3 _. _ 12/03/87 ___.. _ .25.10 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348SO3 12/03/87 75.52 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348803 12/03/87 1 1 .28 SPS OFFICE PROD _ _ _ SUPPLIES 348503 _ 12/03/87 ___ - 23.20 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348SO3 12/03/87 101.50 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348S03 12/03/67.. SPS OFFICE PROD _ _. _ 348503 _ _ 12/03/87 75.52 SP8 OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348803 12/03/87 66.80 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIE8 348SO3 12/03/67 75. SE SP OFFICE PROD __ SUPPLIES -- 3 48S03 - - -- 12/03/87 - _ 136.26 __ __ SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 348503 12/03/67 75.52 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES •. . .. .. . i .... _.., ` ..•- ..t..:w•'.r..•�.�.vw..t� �f �n�+�.. aI�1 •..rtr•/�+t...�..`�..- J'*�i' .rte ..•. PacTe • 12 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER `...____.. CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT.. -__- -_ VENDOR __ITEM DESCRIPTION +` 348S03 12/03/87 54.85 BPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES ' 348SO3 - - -- ._.12/03/87 __.____._ -- - 56.39 .... _ _ ...._.. BPS OFFICE PROD _ __ -._ __ SUPPLIES ._..._- ° 348503 12/03/87 45.92 BPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES ' 348503 12/03/87 82.48 BPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES _ 348503 _ ---.-.12/03/87 250.00 __.__ .828 OFFICE- _PROD._ SUPPLIES _ 9 1,686.97 + " 348537 12/03/87 54.63 SEVEN CRNERS ACE HDW SUPPLIES = 54.63-0 '~ •sssss _ '6 348542 - - -- 12/03/87 a 42.25 - - -_ SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN -- - SUPPLIES '+ 34SS42 12/03/87 44.77 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN SUPPLIES = ssss•s =' 348554 12/03/87 93.00 STREICHER GUNS REPAIR MAINT =- 93.00 • = ssssss 348SSS 12/03/87 -._� ______170.50 $T PAUL CITY OF _ REPAIR MAINT __._ -= _ 348S58 __ 12/03/87 74.75 ST PAUL C1TY OF REPAIR MAINT - =' 348SSS 12/03/87 2,847.72 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT 348558 12/03/87 722.49 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT ' 348558 _ ___ -- 12/03/87 260.15 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT '= 348S58 12/03/87 203.67 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT 348SSS 12/03/87 ___. _- _____66.00 _____ _.. -_ ST PAUL CITY OF _ REPAIR MAINT _ r 348S58 12/03/87 47.50 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT 348S58 .12/03/87 1 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT __. - ,_ -_ - - -- - -- - -- 6 t 352.. 64 _w - •sssss 348565 12/03/87 20.00 ST PAUL RAMSEY MED EXAMINATION '' 348S65 12/03/87 90.00 ST PAUL RAMSEY MED TESTS . 2 1 10. 00 + - 348S66 12/03/87 .02 ST PAUL DISPATCH PUBLISHING `..___. 34SS66 12/03/87 __ __ 53.00 --- ST PAUL DISPATCH PUBLISHING 34SS66 _ 12/03/67 46.60 ST PAUL DISPATCH PUBLISHING �i 99.62 + - ssss•s • 348S70 _._ 12/03/87_ _._. 244.13 STANDARD SP_C_ AL I GN _REPAIR MAINT _ - 3 244.13 + - 348S84 12/03/87 35.00 STEFFEN SCOTT CANINE ALLOWANCE Pag • 13 CHECK REGISTER 1987 :CITY OF MAPLEWOO 0 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CHECK _ NO . DATE -- AMOUNT - - - _ 35.00 a s ssssss 20.00 . 8WANSON_.- l.YLE_ UNIFORMS 6 _- 7 34859 _ -- _12/03/87. —___ 20.00 ' 34ST29 12/03/87 123 .41 T.A.SCHIFSKY SONS SONS REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT _ _ 348T29. __ 1 2/03/87 __— ______722.83 ___ ____ -___T 1,367.91 T. A.8CHIFSKY ___ - -- - T.A.SCHIFSKY SONG REPAIR MAINT CONTRACT PYM 348T29 12/03/87 12/03/87 200.00 T.A.8CHIFSKY SONS ,.: 348T29 _8.414.15 ! _ - -- - - - - -- '� ♦sssss - _- - -- --.. __ 586 .25 TERRYBERRY SUPPLIES 348439 12/0 3/87 . 586.25 =� 22 •sssss TE SEED _— ES SUPPL I _ • - -- _ _34ST43 __— / 03/87 12 - .440-00 440.00 - SSMAN - - 51. 23 T J AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES ;s .348T50 12/03/67 S 1 . 23 = = sssss • 2.85 ____ TWIN CITY SAS! SERV —_ - -- - - -- - - -- SUPPLI - -= 348T86 12/03/87 2.85 s 1 0 0 CITY TESTI -NC _ C CONTRACT PYM =- _.. 48794 — -- 12/03/87 _--- - -- --- _. .0. - - -_ 110.00 -- - -_TWIN _ - -- -- - ... - . - - - -- _ - -- -_ -- -- 51 -- UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS - •.._ 34BUS O 12/03/67 .15 28.70 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED . - - _ ._- UNI FORMS UNIFORMS -- 348050 _._.__12/ - 348050 3/87 - 12/03/87 ________. 130.30 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS �.. 1 348050 / 3/87 12 0 260,00 1 18.05 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED _ _ UNIFORMS UN IFO =' - 348050 34SUSO - -__ 12/03/87 _,___.___._ 12/03/87 ._.— 119.55 _ UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS ` 34BUSO 12/03/87 170.57 878.32 — - -_- - -- - _ --- - -- -- - 17.6 0 11N I VER SAI. � SIGN ^CO SUPPLIES -- - 34BUSS 12/03/87 17.60 • • 1 ;f 4 Page: 14 • 1 � •..J •i► r � "• r. M.f._•i:... �i' r aj„/� W(r�r" 4 1 .�+M'F r:71 a;,jWr. �.:.� *E..".y �...�.! w.t � ►�� • � .. . 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER ,____ K . NO .. . _ DAT E - _A MOUNT_ - - - - - V ENDO R I TEM D ESCRIPTION 5 348086 / 7 12/03 8 131 .P4 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL - UNIVERSAL MED I CA SUPPLIES SUPPLIES._-- ' 348086 __..12/ 03/8?_ __ - -- _131.. 24 ___-UNIVERSAL. .___.- . __ _ 262.48 • 3 348V22 12/.03/87 47.00 VASKO RUBBISH REMOV VASKO RUBBISH REMOV RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL.- ___ 348V22 _.______.12/ 03/87 .___ __1 35.00. _— 181.00 _.._._. - . -- - -. RUBBISH VASKO RUBBISH REMOV REMOVAL _ A 348V22 12/03/87 363.00 � � • +�sss - _12/ 03/87 g4 , TO VIK.INC .SAFE R UBBISH REMOVAL- _348V49 . ___ 89.70 • 348V5 0 _ _ -12/ 03/87 _ ____ - 28.05 ._. -. _ _______VIRTUE PRINTING____ VIRTUE PRINTING __PRINTING_ _ SUPPLIES 348V50 12 /03/87 24.60 -3 .58,65 • :, - 7 348X30 __.. _ _ - i 2/.03/87_ _.____ - 5,, 24 -.---.----.-.XEROX CORP _ . - XEROX CORP _DUPLICATING ___ .. DUPLICATING - 348X30 12/03/87 8.74 25.68 XEROX CORP DUPLICATING . 348X30 12/03/.87 . 40.52. CORP - _ DUPLICATING..._ . 348X30- ._ /87 _ 12/03 .__ -- ___._.____XEROX 25.68 _ XEROX CORP DUPLICATING 348X30 12/03/87 50.52 XEROX CORP DUPLICATING _ 348X30 12/03/87 -- -- -- - -� -- ' - - - -� 348Y50 - --- �� - -_- - 12/03/87 16£.43 YOCUM OIL DUPLICATING , 162.43 f �^ :,. s••sss 68,333.79 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL HYDRAN CH ARGE :2 _ S3 1 -• 68 0 . _ 3 _ - - -- -.F FUND 13 TOTAL C•I•P. EAM W OF E 78 B s 253.13 FUND 31 TOTAL FUND -24 MC KNIGHT /H1 - 110.00 .33 FUND 63 TOTAL .81-20 86 -3 CENTURY AVE DR -E 168.75 FUND 65 TOTAL FUND 70 TOTAL 86 -5 HILLWD 86 -12 ARKWRIGHT f .� ` ' _135.00 - 149.76 - FUND 73 TOTAL 86 -15 WTR DISTR 86 -22 HILLCREST f 118 .091 .05 FUND 76 TOTAL - 9 0. TOTAL_ SANITARY SEWER Fl - j 12 z 495.75 _ _ 1.607.87 __FUND FUND 96 TOTAL _____ VEHICLE i EOUIP - - -- :3 195_, 920,_.35 TO TAL :E s�` -� IN DT CATER TTFM� F�I�IATJ.f;FT v .I:t ! .. ::.! t.:... ... ; 1 c; FUND NO. DEPT. NO. DIV. NO. - - - CUTOFF DATE - PAGE 101 0101 00000000 CITY OF MAFL.EWAOD 11 / 0 /87 1 �, PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS /EARN F' R E M OTHER 1 FWT F' E N U E r� C..: Iii A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M .' O T H E R: S T x T k P E r� R S T G F C M G R U N U N I CI N L- 0 N D'S' MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - -� A�A . r r r • -, , r L. IZ,F= 1) R A, GREAVU , J. I , 1 , + 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 ; - 911' 4 + 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 1 1 1 I I t `t 10 4 1 0109 , 1 1 1 I I 1 40��U - ) - 1 9 3 1 t l I 1 1 1 Z9rJll ` " > 0 0 A 0 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' I ' f ' t ' I ' I ' 1 ' I ' , I i PEF'AL DF C P 1 1 1 I I > WEEKS 2 ST OV i i i t i t t i i t i i t t t FLS C1 WASILUK, C. 1 , 1 , + I 1 , I , 1 , 1 I 1 , 1 t t i t t t t 5 320 0 101 04 $0 3c 5.0 t t t t i t 32gO y5�� t t t t t 30515+ >_ 1 S . 0 1 I + 1 1 1 + I + > DAYS 10 ANNUAL t t t t t t i i i PENAL DF d MF' > WEEKS 2 ST OV I I I t + 1 1 + > FL S 0 + I I 1 + 1 ( + BAST IAN, G. I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 + t 1 + I 1 1 + 1 1 3204 0 101 1318 325.0 t t ; t t t 32 1 0 ; i i t t t . 30117 >- M 4 M A— . O 1 �.:�, 1 1 ..- I ,. 1 :. 1 , t I 1 + t , 2 1 t 1 1 1 I I t + + 1 t 1 1 + 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I , I , + 1 PENAL 1 DF GM P 1 + + t + + + > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ( t I I I + I I I I t 1 I I 1 t I I 1 + I t 1 I + ;> F L-S 0 JUKER, F. t t t i t i t 1 1� =169 1 i t t t i t. i 325O 0 101 7538 3Z5.0 i t t i i t i 32 753 t i i t t t 2755 )":.M O M .at:.. .;..,� .. _ _ ._y .._. ....�._. t 2 2 4 t t t t 1 + t 1 ► 1 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL t t t t t i i t i i P I DF dMP + 1 t f� > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 FLS U ANDERSON, N. 1 1 1 .1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 + I I ' + 32 0 50 0 101 8088 325.0 1 1 1 , ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 32 10 I , I I 14830 1 1 1 1 + + 1 1 + 1 � 153+ 1 4"1 14 2 - 44.. ..., 1 - - ' .. 1 ..._... , 1 �. 4.. .. ., 21 24 t t i t t > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I + + 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 PE4L I DF G MP 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV t i t t t t t t t t t t FLS G I 1 1 1 I I ► 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 + + + 1 1 1 1 I 1 - + 1 1 1 I 1 1 t I 1 1 I 1 1 1 + + + + 1 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 + 1 1 1 , i "�.i'.,`h►�'.�':. =ra .:.;p'R. a:. �11:. :. .,wf�.r�.. .. .. 1 .ti i.rtr.:. 1 .. .. 1 I .. .,r. .. ... •�.. +.�L+ 1 1 ....:r �: .. i 1 1 _.:.e....,- 7...... 1 1 .. 1 ,. .. 1 1 , �.., 1 1 .. 1 + t . 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 + 1 t 1 I 1 I . • "'. ` .. ... . _., .. . ,..y: i ,- .. .. � -::. 1 I 1 , . 4 � f I 1 � I 1 t I , � , ...- ( 1• I 1 1 1 + 1 I ",, . ' 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 ( , ( 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I -A- 1 + + 1 I � 1 1 I ++ 1 + + + 1 1 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN F' R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C: M A EGG ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PREMZ OTHER4 STATE PEN RE STDF CMP CR UN UNION 00NDS MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELL I - S 0 r r' l OR 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 - I _ 1:. �_� U l I I I 1 t I l 1 I I 17 0 0:0 0 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 70 d 0 t_ fj 02 I 1 4 :1 .30 1 1 I 1 1 133 7 PERALF DF C:MF' FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. u 1� 2 DIV. NO. 000 CI CJ F M A P LE ' W I.11: I D CUTOFF DATE 1 1� C1 � 7 PAGE ` � PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN F�iEM iC'ITHE�t1. FWT PEN DEIt-jC:MA EL C: ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PR E M 0 T H E R - f A T E P E N R D F C: t+' f= C k U N U N 10 N P 0 N D S M BA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I i c• r F T - 1 - r• r•. McGUIRE, M. 7 00 1�9 d8 ; ; ; ; ; 1 �:1 i , y�22 :�:��; t� i i i 233CJ:5`� 102 1801 27.690C 0 00 221;52 1 ! 1 1 13(171 i o o0 300',00 1248 :74 > M 1 2 M12 0 i i i : 11 139 1 : i i i i 425 > DAYS 10 ANNU ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; PEF A1_ DF C;MP > WEEKS 2 ST VV :' F L S G BEHM, L. 7400 75156 i i ; 57;13 3409 21;11 852:25' • 10.480C 10 4671 X00 $84 + , ' , ' , I , .�7;. - �4 '- .� l i r�'' S i i i i i 4 7 $1,5 2 )K,- M 0 M 0— 0 i i 1$ 59 i i i X0 0 i 14,88 i > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; PEAL DF C;MP 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV I 1 I ( ! 1 I I I 1 I 1 ► I FLS 0 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I + 1 I ( 1 I I 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ! ! I ! ( 1 I + + I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I ! I 1 + I I I 1 ! I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ! I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 + I + I + + I + 1 1 1 1 ( 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I + 1 1 + + :ycti;.,:, ., sF.• L +.:.:.. _ 6is':, . ,. ..•. ....:r..,; : 1 1 I ...... 1 . I I 1 { 1 ♦ t I 1 I ! 1 i _ .. + I I 1 ( ., .... 1 ..,. { I I t 1 i 1 I I I ( ' .. I 1 1 I + t ! 1 + 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I + I 1 I 1 1 + I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I + + + + I + 1 1 1 1 I + 1 1 I I + 1 1 1 1 1 �ii�iw ;::,a.tti•w'_.r�'.t- r.:.. .... >�;:.. .. ! 1 1 1 ...:.. /.. ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ... ,.::1 I 1 1 1 1 I ( ... + ..,. I ( I ( 1 1 1 ... ,. •�.•. x,.. • I I 1 + 1 t I .., .- t• .., . 1 1 1 I 1 I I ,air..... 1 .. I 1 I ! + ( .. 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 t 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 f 1 + + I + + + { I { 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + 1 t + 1 1 1 I • Ws A: m . �..,. er I t 1 1 1 I 1 f 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I t I I + 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ( 1 t 1 I I I I •1 1 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 I ( + I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I , ! 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 t + I + 1 + I I + 1 I t { 1 I , 1 1 + 1 I 1 t 1 1 ( 1 1 + 1 t 1 I HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT P EN D E D H C: M A EGG ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PREM OTHER2 STATE PEN RES I DF C:MP C:R UN UNION E:ONDS ME-: A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I - r .1 • r- r - � RT - im uipty Pn EE. DRAW 14 274824 i i i i i 2 41 7; �: -•-''. 1 r, •�; 1 �, �,, 1 311'2,'C.4 , 1 1 400 301 , I , , 16 -I �? 5 1 ,�= 5 1 F, � (1 („�( o I 1 I 1 1 7G.71F�' - -: F4 PFRALF• DF CMP FUND NO. 1 DEPT. NO. 01 1 G DIV. NO. . 0 00 00 0 00 CITY O F �� A P L E I+I 1.1 ! I D CUTOFF DATE 1 1/ t_I / ;� 7 PAGE PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL 4 LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN F' R E M 0 THE R 1 FWT PEN D E Fi C. M A E E-; C: ADJ. GROSS GROSS ADJ. NET EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME EM VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME F' R E M O T H E k' S TA T E PEN k ;:; O F C- tr! F C� R UN UNION BONDS, MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - - r - r `� '' ' J AHN D. T * 58 -996 I 1 1 I I 3 7 7;..�4 � :t 3 ��a7 . ;,74 1 I I I i 1 , I 1 �6�� 5 110 4474 $.150 1 I 1 , BOG b�44 I , I 1 ' 1 I , .�!� 4 ..� I 1 I -4I 7 2 J ( I , I 4648 } S' 1 S 1 0 i i i i i i 47;n0 i i i i i PENAL DF dMP > DAYS 10 ANNUA ` r WEEDS 2 ST O Y 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 r, F L S CJ ±i+Ix,.:.• . c t I I 1 I I I 1 I ��...�:,_ - :« -_.___ .: A:..a • -.:, ., .�.. 1 I 1 ....• t 1 I I / 1 1 ( ....... � .. I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I t 1 I , 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t t 1 t 1 ..?.i .. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 '' � ....+ - .. . _. _ ._ �::,sr.;�:,• 1 ...... . ._. t ..,1. t 1 I 1 t 1 i,�f...% ...i.s�:i� : r. <;�t':��:�i.9.�•Y�C.:+.:: {.x� ..:..x..... �... .. I 1 1 ... 1 I 1 t . 1 I ( 1 I 1 { 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I t I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I t I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 ( I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I t I I I 1 I I 1 1 I t I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t I I I HOURS /EARN H O HOURS /EARN EARN HOURS / EARN FF(EM1 OTHEF� FWT FEN DED HCMA E E. C ADJ GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME Z F Fi E M .. O T H E Ft S FEN F� E 1 li f" C: M P C R UN UN E-; 0 N D 3 M A NET VACATION SICK HOLIDAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - r' `= - '= ' r- '=' N ILI n I I I I rP7 DRAW -• 7200 5896 -:0 1 1 1 1 ' t 7 7i :_i 4 7 =� - A 7 4 I 1 t i . 6 G _42 5 I ' 4 �'�'� :OG X1 44 `��4•- i i i l�:_E� F'ERALF DF C:MF' FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0112 DIV. NO. 0 00 0 0000 CITY OF MAPLEWOCID CUTOFF DATE 11/2 PAYROLL JOURNAL i u: _A! PAGE 4 - INITIAL 6 LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 10 T H E:: R 1 FWT FEN D E hi C M A E D C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M _ 01 HER' `. 1 A T E F' E N Ft � D F t; M C: P UN UNION D 1:) N D S MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - r • ;- I N 10 1 _ S - r Aw CURE, L. ; ; 1 I t 1 1 , I 1 I 1 , , -_ -� -�44 t I70 1 , 1 I ! , 1 1 1 , 1 , r ,t 24 44 112 0166 3.030 I I ' I ► I I , I 1 + 1 I , 71 95 1 1 I 1 ! t , , 17�_'';� > S O S 0 0 17,03 I DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEDAL DF C;MP I 1 ! 1 I > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 C 24:40 f FLS S 0 ` ZUERCHER 9 J. 5j47 430 i i i i 157;6 0 112 0908 1.970C i i i i i 456, i 30100 i i i i i 10 2 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' + ' 1 ' I ' 1 ' I ' I 1 , , , i PE�AL DF C',MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 8800 157,60 �• FLS 0 OSTER, A. ! 600 ► 5Zg96 1 1 I 1 , 1 ! 1 1 1 1 + 1�8 , I , I 7. = q3 I I 2,60 ! I t ! t , ! 1 , 1 + + , 1 I + ' + 665117 11Z 5905 8.140 ; ; X00 6glZ ; i i 3gg9 i i 7;25 ; ; ; 465+;3" > rS 1 '. S 1..... 0 :_ $00' 6412 1 , 1 �. I I 1 .... 1 I 1 1 , , 4755 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' ! ' 1 ' I ' I ' I ' t 1 1 ' 1 I I I I PENAL DF I C.MP I ! ! I 1 1 + 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 + I > FLS 0 I , 1 1 I , I ! I , 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 !• , A2..:.h.,. .rii:l.. ..:.W.... .. 1.-. . .. . .l .. . ,. .:.. _ ......., :w_.. 7t- , r. - _.l.J.: ' ..b•... I t ... , n I ' .:1 ....• y , I � • .. . .. 1 , , 'r :.i':.X- s'�+.' ._.�.�Y .•!'Yi K.'. .Si.]h •. 1 r....l ..._ .i 1 _, >.r. 1 '- .. . .y .., 1 ,• 1 �,.. I ., ..a. I , 1 I , 1 1 1 1 I I 1 + I 1 1 1 1 I • ..••' ... .11. :�N .. .. '. /iK •.i ♦ - ♦M: .a. w t .. .. , ..rSrf, I 1 A ...f.. , s r I ! , 1 t .'ad1.: _, .., I I , I 1 , 1 + 1 I I , 1 t , 1 1 ,:. l'••' 1 t 1 t t •r, 1 I 1 t fJ" + 1 ' 1 1 � I ' 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 + I 1 1 1 I 1 t HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN U E D H C: M A E D C ADJ GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME i P R E M 2 O T H ER 2 . O T H E R STATE r ` PEN R E ., D E= C M P C R EJ N UNION L'+ u N D S M [-.' NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 17 Sl F7 T rh IND TAS r_ '= A I, 1 I 1 I I 5 1 64 ��0 5 L 1� r 7� 6 1 1 1 t 1r;. , 1 1 :J :. � 4 Nr } i,) 1 1 1 `�- 1 I t 7 5 0 ,'3 0 ' U 0 �' r ..� 1 L 4 r� 5 C� I 1 1 .� 01 I i 7i:. 5 I -,. 1 1 F 1 1 PERALF DF GMP FUND NO. 1 1 DEPT. NO: o` o 1 DIV. NO. 00 CITY OF M A P L E W +-+..0 D CUTOFF DATE 11 / Z' 0 / , 7 PAGE J PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS /EARN P k E M O T H E Fl FWT PEN D E. i -� C M A E L� G ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME �' R E M 0 T N E R I A T E P E N �; D F C. r� F (Ft U N U N I �� N L': �J N D M G A NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. M ISCELLANEOUS - tj •_ �. R ,- RR V r, , FAUST, D 7400 164 . � ' f 1 1 1 , f f 1 1 I , t .: 1��,�1 -�r.5 7•�,_.� t..— � 7; ! , l I 1 I f 1 t 1 1 1 1 (r r 1$4 2 1078 22. 790C X00 1824 32 i 111;4 132 5+ > M 9 M 9 0 i i i i 2A0 ; 12 :176 i i i 400 i : 62 � > DAYS 10 ANNUA , , 1 I 1 1 � 1 � i PENAL DF C;MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV , , t I 1 1 1 1 1 4 50 > FL8 0 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ( 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 I { t 1 I ( I 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 •. ' ,.' oc .. ... a , .a. _ ir . ..:., .. ,•.yr�,.... .':ts - -.a ... r.l'.. _. -. .a 1 1 _ 11 1 1 I t 1 I 1 ._.- _,' .. I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 .. _.x t n. r.. 1 I 1 I t { 1 I 1 I 1 1 .. .., ! I 1 1 .. ; I 1 . r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . .. j - .::5. I 1 1 1 .. 1 I 1 I I 1 { 1 .. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 { { ... I 1 1 I I t I t I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 n 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I { 1 I 1 1 1 t t t 1 1 t t t t 1 1 1 1 1 t t 1 ( 1 I 1 I 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 t t I I I t 1 1 1 1 Y: ,� .; , ..,bt�i ,�.. - .•.a.:;... _..„::. ,x• , : • .._:. ,y,;;. „�.:. 1 1 1 ..i:.,;,� .. l 1 � 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 ;.•.• ., .... 1 1 1 ,_ -, ..:: I ... t 1 I t 1 I 1 1 .. _ ,. I 1 1 .. 1 1'' I 1 { t 1 1 1 .• r „t .... I 1 1 r . _ ..z, .... I .:+" ., I I 1 I 1 1 1 •.,,..,..• .t ,.... 1 1 1 .,... << f 1 1 1 1 1 1 I .. 1 1 ( ( 1• 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 .,. t ..._.. I I t 1 .: t 1 t ( t t t 1 .... 1 I 1 1 .. ,. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 ' t - I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( t 1 1 t 1 t t t t 1 { I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 .. I t t t 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 t 1 I ... 1 ...::�.,:...- .:max- ...c�.= ,......-_ • .�r.i;+ 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I t 1 I 1 t 1 1 I , 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 I 1 I t t t ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 I I 1 ( 1 ( , I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I t 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 t I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t I f 1 ! 1 1 t t I t I t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I t I 1 1 t t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN P R E M 1 OTHER FWT P E M D E D N C' M A E t a ADJ GROSS . NET GROSS REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME PREM& OTHER STATE PEN RE IDF CMP C = R LlN UN I I .) N L- 0 N 1) S ML-.A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - _ r , �� _ r ' 7 00 lo4C� I t 14•�Z'1 7:� P5 t7.: 1 t 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 G0 I , •'� r r 1���• :/� 1 I I 1 1 I 1 ( 1 — .r I t 1 I .� 11114 . ,I 1 1 1 � -� :: :al +��� I 1 1 I I 1 1 t. I i 1�.�4&ZL 1 3 2 5 5 PERALF DF C IIP FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0`Q2 DIV. NO. 00000000 CITY OF MAPLEW1 OD PAYROLL JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 1 1 / 421 0 / . PAGE 6 16 15 INITIAL 3 LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 10 T H E R 1 FWT PEN D E H t:: M A E D C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PREM 2 "EjTATE FEN R' DF CM CR UN UNION BONDS, MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I - 1 ri A n I I I r� S r. 2 MATHEYS, A. 72,00 76 96 ; ; ; ; 1 '$ 7 ,70 :;71e � 1;55 ; ; i ; i g32+'3• 2 02 4446 10.680 10 0 8844 10 0 6100 ; ' 1 47,x,5 i i 536;�J0 7,25 163;06 > S 5 • S 5 0 6 5 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' 1 ' I ' I ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 i i i PEF�AL DF C;MP t! > WEEDS 2 ST OV ` FLS 0 V IGNALO, D. 6800 71- i i ; 9 {J,30 34109 ; $5Z',2 202 7550 10.480 i 000 8 1 84 i 3c),87 1 �; 10, 85 1 7;25 t , , 505195 >• .M 0 !M O 0 400 4192 I lse 6 DAYS 10 ANNUAL I I 1 1 I I 1 1 PEF AL DF C' > WEEKS 2 ST OV i i i - i i 1qoO i > FLS 0 ANDERSON, C. 4$00 67480 ' ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' ' 1 1 I r 4N86 12;? 4 , 1146;4 20� 9267 14.100 1 1 X00 1180 ' , ' , 1 1 ' 1 6106 , 1 X 46 , X00 , , , 809'14 > M 3 !11 .3 _ 0 200 • 3340 :s- :r. 1 ..: , 1 _ .... I , 104 , 1' > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 PE AL DF C MP 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 > FLS 0 I I 1 I I 1 ',�:...:, i.: ...._ . r ^ t:•.,�e.: ti_ . - ...._ .. ,.... ... � :.::., ...«t --. . :tom ., ..,.., f ..,i. ...• . ,. 1 1 1 t o...i,,;,. ....,. 1 1 • 1 1 r,1?,..if.::+r �. �.. f+ fi�IF ..3r'..'Ya:x.•s.::c... °y.�' ,,... 1 .. c:a.�a .�..Y:,.. 1 1 ,•:�< . ., ,: -. I 1 ..3+t,..♦ . .. I 1 ....:,b r..:,�:�: 1 1 .,._. .� .. .. 1 1 1 ,. .... 1 _ 1 1 1 .. , 1 t 1 t I 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I t 1 I 1 1 ,•t+.t.s.. 1 I 1 / >, i 1 1 .r...a.,. �. 1 1 �, «... , 1 �.c ._i:.M ... ..r'k .yl:�r: ire.%..\�M... �... .n,....; ey,� 1 +:G'i. }..s �_i.:.i• 1 1 _ . r..- ` .s.. I t < =,.1 .N �,.. .. 1 t .. tllr rl _... 1+ .I• ... t .... •i: t. .. ., 1 1 , 1 I . . ... ' I 1 - 1 1 1 ..• , 1 1 t I. 1 , 1 1 1 , i.... I 1 .!.- rY.►+ 1 1 . -... , .. . 1 1 .. ... .. ... • 11 1 1 .. ... ._. t 1 ( 1 t 1 ,c s t, 1 , .... 1 .. , ... I t 1 1 I , 1 1 t , 1 f t ( 1 i .at.,..' 1 , 1 ; 1 as � .. •n,,...,• =i... i'. ioe,..'. v:.:/t4U`••`.a v:.. >.:, ; , . �. Y •.. � .... _.. t .. I _..,, . , 1 .,. 1 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C M A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR. VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PREM OTHE STATE PEN REST DF CMS' CR UN UNION BONDS MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - � 1�• �' ' ' 293174 _� 18 00 215 + =�40 ' I I !1 � J I 1 1 6408 X4,017 1 1 �; , Z. a-2:` ;: ) F ' F 1 •_��,_�8 117,:._ ' I 1 4it:1'' 7. I 1 " ..- 1 .:� �'� 1)o ' F 1 6150 ' 1 1 1 147L►�0 1 L - r1 U V zn;,I 1 t - fj F 1 I 1 I I 1 I I r r.nwL r �r L.F - J ' FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0 3 0 1 DIV. N 00000000 C: I T Y O F M A P L E W O O D CUTOFF DATE i I/ -' 0/ J 7 PAGE 7 PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN P R E M 1 U T H E R t FWT FEN D E H C' M A EEC' ADJ. GROSS GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M .- 0 T H E R S T A T E PEN RSTDF C: M F* C: R UN UNION BONDS M B A ADJ. NET NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PA C MISCELLANEOUS - �- r - �y , -. , , - W , AUREL I US, L. 6800 143gO4 i i i i ' 4 69 4 1 5,;44 2'4'91 i i i ' I ' I 17 � 1 514 8 301 2198 Z1.030C 400 81 1 dO() 16 24 ; ; 1 ; 11-165 2ZJi08 258'100 1 i i i 9 '%-:4� > M 1 M 1 0 i i i i i 2 -10 i i i i i i > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i i i i PEOL DF GMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS U SELVOG, B. i i i i i i i i 411 i i i i i i i 6200 801 4816 7.750 1 , 1 , t I 1 t I I I t 1 I I t ' 93 I t I f 1 , f 56 -9 > S 0 S 0 d > DAYS 10 ANNUAL r i i i i i i i i i PENAL DF CAMP > WEEKS Z ST OV i i i i X00 6 ,. �•y FLS O 1. SCHADT, J. 6400 58�60 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 t 1 ! , , 10494 1 2583 1 1 1 1 1 t I t 1 f 1 t 1 745t1F 301 9815 9.150C 400 7 12 0 Q 400 7120 i i i i 4411 i 1385 i 7i25 i i i 49454 > S 0 S 0 0 1 I 1 t 1 t 1 r 1 1 1 r Ilse t 1 5:33 1 t I r 1 t 1 t 1 + I 1 1 t I 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i i i i i i PE41 F DF 1 d MP t 1 f > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 t t 1 1 1 I f 1 I 1 1 I t I 1 1 ��yy r FLS V 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ! 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 t ! 1 1 1 I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 r 1 1 I 1 ! 1 1 1 • ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I ! I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 ( I 1 , I 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 f I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 I t 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 t 1 ( . 1 •r_,. 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I t 1 I I 1 t 1 I 1 t I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 ( 1 ( 1 I I 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 t I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I t 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 t I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 OTHE 1 FWT PEN D E D H C:11 A E L3 C AADJGNET S GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M� O T 11 E R• STATE PE R E :� T D F C: M P C: R UN U N I CI N FON D S ME: A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - g �• �, - �, ''� 13,300 201 464 i i i . i i i 35* :��_ i :�` 1 1 1 1 � i �5 1 �► %3 -� 1,3 0 0 I 15 I 16 I 2 4 114 4 1 1 I t I 1 .I _ rd 1 1 r =� t =� �� -� I �. r� -� �, �. _, -� t t=� 7t ._ . 1 I 1 14 7 3-9 G AA oe1 7A A PERALF DF C11P FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. it C; 0 2 DIV. NO. 00000000 CITY OF M A P L.. E W 0 O D CUTOFF DATE 11 PAGE S PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN F' R E M i 1J T H E R 1 FWT PEN D E H C: M A E t� C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME F'REM • `1_1THE.R STATE PEN RATDF CM CR UN UNION BONDS MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - r-\ - � 1 - _ R A ! .! -------------- r HOSCHKA G. i - --------- i -------------------- ------ i i i i 1' 3 i i i i i i i 4;5U t 3 3405 6 .700C C`j J7 i i i i 1 i i 1 . 0 4,7 1 > M o M 0 0 DAYS 10 ANNUAL FEF�AL DF C:MP 7 WEEKS 2 ST OV 3500 23450 j F L S O 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 ( 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 t I 1 I I 1 t I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 l . \., .:.....: l . ._ ra.. .. • . -. .. 1 ..- 1 .. 1 I 1 I ...• 1 . • • I .... 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 � I 1 1 1 1 i t 1 ; . 1 i + ; 1 � 1 I � 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 { 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t t t ��+ -.d 14 v., •'M...si:. r,•'51.. �..,i :.r:. y., .r.k•. 1 .. ..' n• 1 a I 1 1 r .. 1 1 1 I 1 .. i .. ... . I I I 1 w. I, .:.L. 1 I .. .1 . ... 1 1 •. -. 1 1 I I ., 1 1 I 1 t:l I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I nrl. - ....l,.. .. 1 1 1 1 . w.•. 1 t 1.. 1 1 I ` - 1» 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I . .. ..•.:�.,:.:s.:..: ;� .. -... ti ..,..:... . el:.;... • 1 1 ..• .; : ,. 1 ... 1 1 I 1 .,c { ,u 1 I 1 1 _..• � ... I I 1 1 . , .. � I 1 t 1 .... t :. I 1 1 t .. I I 1 { 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I I I 1 ..v.. I 1 ( 1 I .1 ....:. 1 1 I ...�.....•:.. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t • • I ( 1 1 i I 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 1 HOURS /EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS / EARN F R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT FEN D E D H C*. M A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M ' 0 THE R STATE PE R E% 1 D F C M P C R UN UNION BONDS MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS c i hi c` r' k 4 b 0 1 I I 1 I 1 1 cw� 471 I 1 ( t I 1 I I 657 I I 1 I I F'L.KALI llr L -Mr FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0303 DIV. NO. 0000 CITY OF M A F L E W I D CUTOFF DATE 1 1/ ._ cj 7 PAGE 9 PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN F' R E M 1 I� T N F. k 1 FWT F' F N D E i r� C M A E B . G ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M ± O T H E R '� �� 1 A T E P F_ N R 1 D F +_ M F C R U N UNION L--' O N D S MBA NET NO. REPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - �_ �� : �: -� . 1 T C'97 nRAW KELSEY, C . ' �� ' 4: 3 : 111 U : : : : : : 52 7:4 3 1 303 0547 8.40 1 , 1150 6430 , 1tl,.;::; ►. ; =;: 1 15::00 ,F'�4a i i 2345 0 ; ; : : 7 1 DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 PEOL DF 1 C I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 5 50 457132 F L S V VIETOR, L. 6� 50 61034 1 joo : 91',23 3Ci j - Z - 07 , 141 i odo J : : 7;25 : 1 : 13100 : I 726:66 , 402',97 303 4435 $ .910 1 71i?$ : i I I �.. M 0 M 0.... 0 150 31:19 : : : : : : : : 1 d$ : ' 51�a:3 ' : PE4L - DF C : MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL : : 1 , 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I t > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 FL. - i U I 1 1 7Ci17 1 3 : : : I : ; 41 5:8 3 HENSLEY P. 30x3 495+4 8.490C 1144 9113 200 6792 : : i : 1F;05 : &31 : d45 1 : I 26514 )l S 0 S 0� -• .0 2956 24A47 : : : : 3 : 2 7:j F'EFGAL DF G:MF' > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 1 I I I 1 ' ' ' > WEEKS 2 ST OV �-y > F L S - 3 V CARLE J. 71:00 526`:$2 77'.28 i50 27:19 i 21 :19 ���5 : 1 L5 :�JO : 7:25 � I 6790 32845 303 6105 7.420C 1:00 7.42 200 5536 6:50 735 i : 3 1 I ly,_ M - - 0 PE4L DF G : MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OV > F L T GREEN, P. �' 7200 82468 8 li 64 — 37:16 1 6 : : : 7it : : : : : 92905 595;42 303 8389 11 .440 + 1 20 9 L52 1 1 : : 4"54 694 92'135 ' I 0 I 1 1 1 1 I PE 4AL DF dMP ` > D AYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST UV S > FL 0 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 ( 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN P Fi E M l OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C: M A E F � C ADJ. GROSS GROSS ADJ. NET REGULAR VACATION 'FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M 2 O T H E R Z STATE PE N R E � 1 D F C M P C: R Ll N UN 1 CI N D ON D Si �' MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 I - r` � r _1 _ '-' ' "' I 1 1 ' , DRAW. ' r �' 7 ' -' : 7 7 -� I .'� t. I 21 150 1 6 car 4 1 1; 44 104 55 : : I 39 0 351188 1 1 I r I,� F r� S0 7:'35 : I 1 : I 1 37 ca 71 I 14:7 7 1 1 :1 5 1 � �, ; _I��.� ;w::: �_.� - -r F' :: 1 .._��ICJ -' ,i 1f�-�F ' I _ 1..I�. o ,_ , _ _ 1 1r�.`..�I f� r.. h A.L. r- I) I- I'1 r ;rlF F(t 4R7 =' _ 1 ' a FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0401 DIV. NO. 00000000 CITY OF M A P L E' W 1.1 D CUTOFF DATE 11 2 O/ PAGE 1 c� PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN F' R E M 1 �� T H E FI' 1 FWT F' F N D E H C: M A E L3 C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M 1 _ 0 T F -1 E R' STATE F'E'N R� T D F C i': F C: R U N UNI BONDS MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 171 c l r , 2 - i •, D COLLINS K. 5400 132f 08 i i ; � '1 ; 19 _j ,5 15 _-: 4 1 C�:�2 i , , , , 1917;4$ 401 1717 23.680 1 400 37q;38 SO U 18V 1 1 C14 ' 17: ;0 go_ 1150'00 13' 105 8 > M 4 M 4 0 i i , i , i 20 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' I ' I ' ( ' 1 ' 1 ' I ' + ' 1 ' � PEF�AL DF C';MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV r+ F L O RICHIE, C. 7400 62 452 i i i i i ; 8'tiI1 2C'�27 1'44 i i i i i 706;65 401 2356 8.660 ' ' 000 65 28 ' ' ' ' 3G 1 1 :�8 5 98;00 7;25 9 ; 376;03 > M 0 MI 0- 0 .. 11$ 5(442 1 400 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; '1 '1 '1 '1 , ; ; i PEF�AL DF C MP , WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS O SVENDSEN, J. 6400 66416 i i i i i ; 105 3473 9 i , i i i 868,25 401 2934 i0.6Ci0 ' 1 ' 1 400 81 44 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' , 5 � 2438 � r. 7;�5 1 1 1 9,50 1 , 2 1 56[113 > S ! S 1 -• 0 1000 10684 � ' , - -� ' ...,.. � . ' .. , ' 1 14$. i 61 '138 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 , I , I , I , I , 1 , 1 , I , I , 1 , PEkAL DF 1 C.,MP 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV ' FLS O + NELSON, R. 7400 14$752 1 1 1 , 1 1 I , 1 1 I , 21D'141 r) 1 134107 r rl 3aOT I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1675 3 401 3183 20.660 ' 1 ' 1 d00 16 28 i i i i 107'139 i 2208 304100 i i 13;00 i 850'18'6 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL , , , , , , I , 1 , I , I 1 1 PEkAL DF 1 CA MP I 1 , 1 + 1 + + > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 I 1 I 1 I I t 1 '> FLS CJ DOLAN R. i i i i i 49 ; 7153 5,97 i i i 1 '1 I 249120 ' 7 401 3654 6.730 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r) x,93 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 + 1 1 I + 1 210195 1 �.. _.S Z . , S ..Z. �.. - ..: O > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 ..„ ._. ,..�.... I , 1 ... .r:..j..., ._.... , ( ...: , ... , , � ..�:.. , ;,;, , 1 , .. , . 1 , _ .. , .. , , 1 1 :.... , , 1 It, 82 , , 1 + PEFULFDF 1 CI MP ► 1 + 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 34 00 2442$ FLS O OMATH, J. 5400 4 9 448 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IdS 1 1 1 8484 2 r. — E41 81 10 115 1 1 1 1 + � 1 � 1 � + 72025 401 7636 8.830C 100 7064 d00 7064 i , i i 37'179 i i i 7,25 50100 , 1 44E•164 !4 0 ... > 0,.::. ,.0 d00.. -.. 7064 , .. , . , , 1 , 577 1 I 1 1 1 + > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i , , i i i i PEF�AL DF CAMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 + . FLS O MARTINSON C. 7400 60d52 i , i i 131$ 5 72'29 27,47 1 :85 i , i i , i i 68665 401 9263 8.410C d00 028 i i i 3110 i i 20:00 7,25 13 '100 458`3 M I m 1.. 0 1 1 1 •�.., . , , , , _ , 406 r 1 ► 1 � 1 + ' > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i i , i PER:AL DF C:MF' > WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• , 1 I I 1 1 1 i ' 1 HOURS /EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN P Ft E M 1 OTHER FWT 1 PEN D E D H , .. l M A E D C ADJ ADJ. GROSS NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE OVERTIME TIME PREM:: 0THhFt `' STATE PEN RES l�F CMF' CFi UN UNION BO NDS MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS r r r� ? 41 61 A Y 39000 r F ��L(j► 51 I 1 1 1 t i ' ' ���'�,� ' , ' 7F�F���1 41 C,1 .:. ; ��-'� ; ;'c 157:�%��a': . _� �_ 5c�,,c,C, 57, 1 6��4�� -y r. 301 2� 2400 44'452 4 4100 64713E 1 I 37 c =�10 I 1 I PERALF DF C:MP FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0402 DIV. NO. 00000000 A: I!::.- CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CUTOFF DATE 1 1 PAGE PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 O THE R 1 FWT PEN D E H C M A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME 4. PFtEM _ OTNER'- STATE PEN R� DF CM CR UN UNION BONDS MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 1 - An m - A T N n T N - > ZAPPA, J. 7ti00 129412 i > 00 14168 ; ; i ; i ; ; ; 14:x-',04 71;u7 11442 6441 i , tiC;46 , , ; : 10,50 , 1455:'2 $�LhS 402 0130 17.960 > M 0 M O 0 i i i i i i 14 ' i ' i i PENAL DF GMP i i > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i > WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS . O + ' ' 94;70 , 104+69 71:26 + + + 1 30 r+5 8 STILL, V. + i + i + i + i i i 6 1 3102 65100 i i i i 87 {� 40"' 0251 16.070 � > M 5- M 5 0 i 8400 i 128160 i i i i 210E i i i i 2 ANNUAL > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i , ► + � � PENAL DF GMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS 0 SKALMAN D. 7 00 i'zod96 i i i i ; 16 "'59 10&'60 7137 i 6523 i i 1200 i 135714 9144 402 0457 16.680C d00 1344 i i 8"'45 M O M O 0 i i 2d0 i i i i PENAL DF G MP > DAYS 10 ANNUA i i i i > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS " N C NELSO , C. 5900 97.,72 171,77 11420 1749 i &'46 i i 1475 10557 402 091$ 17.370 i i d00 13196 i i i i 85'105 2 I >-s 5 . -. S-6- . 0 -.1400 2 T � 9 2 i i i i i i i PENAL DF GMP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 400 6�4$ J- FLS 01 M �]RE LL I R. 7 00 117 6 4 i i i i i ; i T 02 44190 106:61 54+63 i 323108 5iE5 i 13326 71 C'�5 9 4 02 0990 16.370 i 400 13496 .., i 2 0 � r i M3._ ,:. M ... 3...... 0 ...1.�..,.., .., .:., . , , :. , . _ .. , .. i .., . f. i , i i i i i PERIAL DF GMP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i + > WEEKS 2 ST OV ' FLE 0 STEEPEN, S. 7 00 i 117d00 i i 400 i 13000 i 450 i Sd31 i i 1 i 191166 9 11 $2 9i25 i i 2308 35:'00 i 1 i i i 149717 7 102246 402 1204 16.250 to .. -.1 , 425 210 14 1 M 1,. _. o l �; PENAL DF GMP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 450 7J13 J ;- F L S 0 " D. I 4J50 I 76d30 : i I ' i ` , . '" . d 2264 i i i 4932 116+42 + i + i + i i ' i ' • 1455+ta ARNOLD, 402 1364 17.960C 2400 431104 d00 1468 i i i 8906 i 15146 89700 700 5206 550 PE4L DF C+MP I f DAYS 10 ANNUAL 9478 + , : > WEEKS 2 ST OV " FL 0 8 AN I CK J . 1 7 00 117400 ' ' ' ' ' i 1 8� 45 _ 119'82 31+43 ' + ' ' + ' + ' + + ' + ' + ' 1497:77 ' 101744 402 1577 16.250C i i 800 13400 450 109'69 9435 2303 25�0U 120 i > M i M 1 0 + ' 230 : I i i PEF�AL DF CAMP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 400 6500 El 01 HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN FWT ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS kui!_ .111:!_,_._.. 1 1 . 1 . FUND NO. 1 o 1 DEPT. NO. �� 4 (,1 2 DIV. NO. 0 0 0 0 0 I) O U C I TY O F M A P L E W O O D CUTOFF DATE 1 1 � ` : 0� 8 7 PAGE 1 PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 O T H E R I FWT PEN D E H C M A E B C ADJ: GROSS GROSS ADJ. NET EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME R UN UNION BANDS MBA VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME F'REM '- EITHER'- �'TATE PEN RS DF CMFC: NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY CO MISCELLANEOUS I - r' BOHL J. 4g00 -� 709 ' ► , , , ' , ' , 14T28 �� '54 ,,-. 1 11,54 - 9,�2 1394e- 402 1660 15.760 2100 37824 100 12408 2,00 47,n8 0 3 ; 23108 50;00 ; i 4 942 :145 > M 2 M 2 0 q00 47428 4 4 1 i 23,'0 i 4 i 4 4 2100 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i PEF�AL DF C;MP > WEEKS 2 ST OVI l00 6404 ' FLS 0 CAHANES, A. 5400 115496 4 4 4 4 4 1 137,74 89,65 134107 317 12 08 5+54,00 1 , , 1f�75i88 204158 402 1899 20.660 1.400 33856 000 16128 , , 1 , , M 5 M S 0 , ' , ' , ' ' ' ' 210E 4 PENAL DF C;MP 4 4 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS O CLAUSON, D. 3800 50 40 4 1 1117 650,58 1040 5475 1 4 47;00 117;00 ; ' 4 ' , 1 12,00 ; ' , 1357'4 , - ; ��, $3: -�-►8 402 1930 16.680 4000 667120 104 13144 , ; , y. M 4 M 4 O x00 3 43 6 , 1 210 4 4 4 4 PEaAL DF CMP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 ; 4 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 - 4 4150 4 1 4 4 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 1 ,• FLS O MOES CHTER R. , 1 700 120196 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 17016 8V105 , , 117194 49438 4 1 308 5904 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 1 1474124 411163 402 2063 16.680 , , X00 13144 X00 5104 , M 1 M 1.8 . 0 ...... , :. , , 1 , 1 210 1 4 1 1 PERIAL DF C1MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 4 00 6472 > FLS 0 PELT IER W. 6400 1149 44 1 1 8,25 2 ` - 6 ' 1 1,42 49195 , 1 100100 215; 1 , 18,75 , 7400 1455 79237 402 2884 17.9'6 0 � 00 14168 � 00 14168 1 1 ' PEF�AL DF C4MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS 0 SZCZEPANSKI , T. 700 102168 , , , I , I , , , , 200,57 , I 100,51 9 ,65 1 4 i 1 1 1 4 1 i 1257161 8442 402 2$99 14.190 4 4 100 11152 2'100 4y57 4 1 7C;98 23403 PEFIAL DF d MP 1 4 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 400 5476 FLS OT WELCHL IN, C. ' 6400 ' 881,2$ 1 1 4 1 4 , 1 124124 99'13 4 22.157 4 , , 4 1 4 4 1241173 ��, 861.5 - 402 3243 13.770 X00 l l di 6 X00 1 116 X00 6297 , 6C,38 , 43+08 1,00 ' 437 > M 2 M 2-- 0 4 4 1 1 1 PER:AL DF CAMP + > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 4 > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 400 5dO8 > FLS U LANG, R. 400 80928 4 4 1 1 4 1 14t43 117417 46402 4 4 4�'0 4 1464461 2 5:3 3 402 3591 16.860 2400 404;64 doO 1341$$ 1100 2'5'12 9 1 1 873 i X9423 74 3ic�0 h50 > M 2 M 2. 0 4 i i 4 4 i 4 i 4 2�io 4 i 1 i 4 4 PE4LFDF CiMF' 4 DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OVT 400 67144 HOURS /EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS / EARN FWT ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME NET VACATION SICK HOLIDAY CO OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS ' , ► , , i � ' i i 1 , 4 , i i DIV. NO. CUTOFF DATE PAGE FUND NO. 1 01 DEPT. NO. 04 0 CI 00000000 CITY F MAPLEWC.10D 13 , PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 T H E R 1 FWT PEN D E ! i C M A E D C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME - - M G A NET VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME F R E M 0 T H E R • `; T A T E PEN R D F C M C' R UN UNION B NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - 1 7T 17 T A T KI rl T KI r : C P ALMA, S. 7 * 771112 IT ' 1` 7 , F5+ Ji:iS� I 7� :: c-1 1 6 ' I I I 1 I 1 1 1 �_ 8 8 7 `! IP r 6 0 6 402 4775 10.710 X00 8168 ; ; , 41; 5 E, 2 0;3. , �' •�, I , , 1 , ,� 14 S 3 S 3 0 ; ; 210 8 i 1'; 44 ; ; I PEkAL DF C;,MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; i i ; i ; i - -�t_► > WEEKS Z ST 0 1 ; ; ; i ; �! i i i ; `- FLS 0 HERBERT, M. ; 71100 ' � ; 118120 ' � ' I � ' , � � ' ' , r � ' ; � - ' 1 %.',04 ' 71:00 I I 1 I 109175 53,88 i 73108 I 1 727 ;0 , , i i , i i 'r i3711� 8 61463 40L 4916 16.860C I I X00 1388 ; ; ; + 2do r ;�o . 0 � M 3 . M 3 � 00 3I72 � ; � � � � PE DF C 1 0 > DAYS ANNUA > WEEKS 2 ST OV ��yy FLS V DREGER, R. 4 0 8 6 �-'� 8 i i ; i i i 18g69 116 2 - : 3 5 i 5000 i 278 i i i i 18;00 i ; 145 Fi2 6 688 402 6119 17.960 2400 431,04 1100 14468 r r 91:42 ? M 0 M 0 - 0 I PERIAL DF C1MP 1 ' > DAYS 10 ANNUAL , , I 1 , , 1 , 1 1 , > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS G ME J R J . 7u00 1157;04 i ; i ; 1 55 3 . 92 104169 4 1 41 i 3308 124100 ; 2500 , I 13003;6 74711 402 7686 16.070 ; ; 1100 121156 ; i 2 10E i 70;47 } M 0 M 0 0 ...... t ,.. I ._... i ; ; i i ; i i PE4L DF C:MP DAYS 10 ANNUAL ` D � i 1 , 1 , 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS U 7�i00 120G�96 i ; i i IO-e.38 10':6 53175 i i i ; , 1369 9 ItFNE 8. ST , i i 11 00 13J44 150 1 51 , , r 7u�02- ter' , 2. 08 ' 94100 ' I 1 I 40 i 9076 402 8226 16.680 r 1 I I r I i ; ; . 240 i 1 I PERiAL DF CiMF' , , r , > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i � r I I 1 1 _ , I 1 1 1 I > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS O BECKER , R.. ..� 71100 1 17360 ' 1 1 ; 1 i , .,i 2811 1 1 c.1 1 1 ; i _ 1 13121 46��? i 73+08 r 344100 , ; + i r ; i 1415 ;1$ 445+8$ ,. 40� 8434 16.340 ' I t r r $00 I 13040 I I , r I , , . ' 230 7u58 r ' 1 1 i 1 ; 1' 0 >,--M 4 M - 4 .. ..1.0 ,. ,. ,.z... , ... , 1 ,: i 1 i 1 i i i PEkiAL DF Ci MF' '•> AN NUAL DAYS 10 AN 1 i > WEEKS 2 ST OV `= FLS 0 HALWEG, K. 4000 71440 1 ' 1 120'65 12396 42101 r , i i f ' ; ; ; ; i ; 1549 5 915 $ , 402 8516 17.5+60 300 i 57 ' 472 i 8 00 i 14468 J50 9429 i 194 $u i 9 9 ; 3&46 i ; 22400 1 ; r 1 1 1 1 1 M b M 6 0 - 1 PE4L DF C,MP DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS O STOCKTON D. s ' 5600 ' 8959'2 ; � ; � ' ; 1 , , I I I , I , 56 , � l 1 r 10 4169 2 1 ' I � ' 67500 , 1 I � ; 1 r 130$163 ,34 `-, 402 9204 16.070 800 , 12$56 I , I , r 1 67165 � 23�11�- 1 1 , S 7 S 7 0 1600 20 ' r i � ' 210 PER:AL DF CIMP I I DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I I 1 , I > WEEKS 2 ST OV - c Qi HOURS / EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS/EARN F1NT ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS A FUND NO. 1 DEPT. NO. 04 DIV. NO. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CITY O F M A P L E h! � � 0 D CUTOFF DATE PAGE 14 ' T PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL b LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS HOURS / EARN REGULAR VACATION SICK PAY HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOLIDAY CO HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS p �; E M 1 1 _ r F R E M " - T H E Fi 1 _� O T H E R 2 r FWT r S T A T E FEN D E r � _ FEN R j T +, H C: M A D F C M FL C R UN r UNION B E L ' C MBA ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS NET �1 PAULOS -JR. , P. ; ; . ...... I ............................. ... 1 , I I -A , 1 ` °5148 6E40 6 t 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 850 3 n 40Z 9499 9.950 I , f , I 1 1 '00 1 1 i '`l3 ' 1 ' 1 5 1.' /7 ,� ; ; ; ; ; : ; 593►58 > s 0 s 0 0 ; ; ; ; ; ; 1434 ; ; > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' ' ' ' ' ' ; ' ' ; PEF�AL DF C:MP > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 40 0 `QOO 7900 FLS 0 BOWMAN, R. 7400 1134 ; � � � ; ; 147;58 1143 48;97 ; ; + i 1 1417;$4 402 9867 15. 760 ; ; 000 i 2 X00 7092 ; ; 8� 82 208 40 99776 M 2 �1 2 0 210 ; PEkAL DF CiMP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i ; ; ; I , > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 400 610 1 1 1 + 1 � 1 FLS O KARIS ' F.. ; 7200 ; 117064 ; ; ; i ; ; ; ; + i ' 1 ; 1 - 85;57 ( 110154 1 37;13 1 ; 1 i 1 ; 1 ; 1 ; 1 13$17 9 403 0009 16.370 ; ; 400 13196 X00 49;11 , ' , 6T29 , 2 :08 762100 : : : 292;18 M 7 M .,, O t I 1 I I I I 1 1 PER,AL 1 DF C,MP I > DAYS 10 ANNUAL , , , , , , , , , I > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS 0 HEINZ $ . 7 00 117 64 ' , ' , ' , ' , ' 1 ' , 165,04 { ' 121168 I '�r 4E3 1 1 I 1 + 1 + + + i 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1520194 403 0466 16.370 ; ; 8 0 13096 51'00 12'4.•,78 ; ; 9t+dL i 1 23;03 1 : 1 : 1 1 i 1 1 1065+;15 1 " N L 2_ 0 + 1 ( 1 w I , I ... I 1 f ; 1 1 ; 2 (J ; 1 I ; I 1 ; w..'. t ; 1 PERIAL ,• I DF CiMP 1 , .._.. 1 .• -. , > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; ; ; > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 400 6 FLS 0 GRAF, D. 7.00 124416 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I i 1 , ; F 17,.,, 07 67;04 f 112144 i 50 119 283108 1 , 123;00 ( 1 : + + i 1 1 10,`85 1 1 : 1 1405+48 583181 403 1789 17.280 + + 8100 13dZ i + + ' llb,. S 0 8 . pa..:.. _p _. , _. ,.. , , . , a. -, .... , 2d0 PE DF C ; P > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST O V 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ` FLS O f THOMALLA D. • 7400 117464 1 1 I 1 I I I f I I 1 1 2 2691 1 130!68 : 37'152 I 1 ` 410 1 + 1 + 1 1633148 88 3 403 2052 16.3700 ; ; dOO 1 13496 1 12:25 1 300 80 1 i i 1 l u 56 I 1 23+08 1 180 1 1 + + + 1 + 1 1 1 ( 1 1 PER;AL DF C;MF ' > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS O YOUNGREN, J. 56;00 93152. 1 I 1 - 19 a 5 rl 1 54 1 111 1 9 R 1$7 1 41Z0 1 1394119 754 4 �3 r201 16.670 1 600 2 S00 13J36 1150 37i51 I I 7:181 1 :.48108 f 1 + > S a S a 0 1 f 1 1 2 I I I PERIALFDF C�MF DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I I I 1 1 1 I , I I I 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST 01/ FLS O RAZSKAZOFF, D. 6200 1167;56 1 1 1 1 1 ; , ; 17160 117192 ; 16161 23;08 I ; 1 ; + 1 3:'30 1 1473195 105513 4 a3 4316 17.170 ; ; Boa 137136 300 77i7 ; ; 8431 1 i 1 1 S 5 S 5 0 1 i 4;00 68:68 I 2J0 1 I PERI ALFDF CIMP DAYS 10 ANNUAL I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 , , 1 I > - WEEKS 2 ST OV F 9 . rill HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN FWT ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME NET VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 1 1 t I I , FUND NO. 1 DEPT. NO. 04 U.` DIV. NO. 00000000 C I T Y OF MAPLEt+l O D PAYROLL JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 1 1`. C) 8 7 PAGE 15 INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN �' R E M 1 fj T H E F� 1 FWT FEN D E I-i C: M A E Ii G ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M . - O T H ER ; T A T E PEN R ':J' T D F C M F C: R UN UNION D O N D S. M L' A . GROSS NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - - r - r - r� , -, -� �. VORWERK, R. 61 00 110592 2 1 00 1 1 X4 4 2�50 JW 14 4 403. 6071 17.'80 dOO 13124 i '1 074,9 '1 3C ,'O8 503100 '1 '1 ISi00 '1 42'j'154 > S 2 S 2 0 100 131? '1 '1 ; '1 210E- > DAYS 10 ANNUAL '1 i '1 '1 i '1 '1 i '1 PENAL DF C'1MP ` WEEKS 2 ST OV F L S U BERGERON, J. X00 3988 '1 '1 '1 i i � 2101 1 1E44 0 2, i i i i i 1455::4 403 7418 16.370C 4400 78 11 00 131196 100 1 UIt43 LZ 5!5 1 1 > S 2 S 2 0 1 I I 1 + 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL '1 '1 '1 '1 '1 '1 '1 '1 i 1 PENAL DF I GMP 1 1 I I 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV F L S U MELANDER J. TOO 1205'58 '1 i '1 '1 i i 247;77 134+46 1.566 '1 '1 '1 '1 i 16801'7 , 403 7791 16.980C 1100 13184 1175 222 i i 111'154 i 57:70 88 Vi00 9120 + 224:4 M 0 °- M .0` 0 1 1 l 1 1 L00 14 98 I t 2J0 I I 1 t 1 I + 1 t + + I 1 DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I I , 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 t t PE9AL DF 1 I GIMP I 1 1 I 1 I 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 I > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 450 741 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 t I 1 1 I ( .% FLT 0 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 ( I 1 I I 1 + 1 1 1 1 I 1 I ( 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I + 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I + 1 + 1 1 KBE.:. ,. i:..,, . . ss;.,. t+. i,;:6;QL,.,.:cs . •w±F�`� . .. 1 1 . _ _ , � . _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. ., .,. + .: ,.:. I 1 1 f I I .. + I I I 1 1 I � ..... 1 1 1 I I 1 ,., t ... _ I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 + ( I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I + 1 I 1 I + 1 1 1 .: ►•-• ..�; .ti. aKw,: i._..i :..• . �. • 1 1 1 1 t t 1 I 1 1 t ..., . 1 _ 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I + 1 I 1 I 1 1 t 1 . �,_...1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I , 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I t 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I + I 1 1 1 1 I I + 1 1 1 1 I I 1 + I 1 1 1 1 ' HOURS /EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS/EARN Fi E 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C: M A P M E C� O A J. GRO S GROSS REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M 2 OTHER STATE P EN R E �, - D F C: M N C: Fi U N U N 1 C� N 0. O N D M E--' A NET c - c I ipp P;T I I SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS UNG r� r F 20 450 rr 1 �• f 33 ,6 L � I 1 I 1 1 ��L� -y 5 tiT 7 ��J� ' ii ��J. :�h. I 1 :_. i �l 1 _.(,� I 1' 0 1 1 ` 1'5 13 - y I 4 89L 2 164 ry �y[y 5 26 400 r r 45ZJ7 r _I . j — 26400 r 437JU4 _ _ • r J 50 1 1547'1'x+1 ( i i 1 2741�I6 — 1 I ( _- �30 9z _ : = :r� I J , 1 _ 1 :.1 I 1 �ti �I -5 I — I I 244��;. 1 550 9878 PERALF DF CMF' 4900 76138 8000 796,00 - Q1►r "1 FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0405 DIV. NO. 00000000 C OF MAP L.EW I_IOD PAYROLL JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 1 1 / ZO 87 PAGE 16 INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 O T H E R 1 FWT PE D E H C: MA E P . C Abi- GROSS GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME F' Fi E M 2' O T H E R .- STATE PEN R S D F C M F C: R UN UN ION L -' O N D M G A ADJ NET NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - ,7 1 - ,_ ,-, i im L. I F , A44 EMBERTSON J. 7400 1267192 ; ; ' ' ' 2 `'c) 1 14;55 - . , - . , . - 3307 - ; - - - I- - - ; - - ; ; 1431;5 405 1$78 17.610 , 1 �00 14088 1 1 , 5511 1 i 4416 i i i 13,OU , 8943 1 > S i S 11 .0 I 1 I 1 I 1 20 I I I I t 1 I 1 1 I > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i , 1 i PEF AL DF C;MP , > WEEKS 2 ST OV > F L S u WILLIAMS, D. 5$00 56152 i i i i i 107,14 104153 53 125616$ 405 3333 15.420C X00 12136 , , 1 1 5E 00 1 1039 130:00 1 1 13;00 ; 65459 1 M 2 M 2 - 0 f t 1 I f ► 1 1 t f t t 2 10 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1400 24872 , , , , , ; , ; PER�AL DF C1MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS O I 1 t 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 • 'W.: .•..... ... r : J. .w ... ..r. 1 _, t I ( 1 t a t • I 1 t I t 1 .. 1 I 1 1 t f 1 I I 1 t 1 .. .,. 1 t I 1 t I ( 1 t .. I t 1 t I 1 1 t .. I t ( t. ... I I 1 1 I I � 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 t t f I f t I I 1 t 1 1 I I 1 I f 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t I I t f I f t t 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 f I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 y '`..r .. V •i•ia'. t •+�v Y ... r " if ...... ...... -. -. ... I . ... ". .. 1 . r.. 1 I I t t .. , ,' � _ t t I I 1 . _ t I I 1 t 1 .... a..... . 1 1 t t I t � 1 I t I 1 I I 1 1 t I I . I t I I I .. .. I .. I I I I 1 Y . t .. t I I I 1 . ... .....� . .. I I I I 1 � .. 1 I f t 1 t t'..i..._ 1 1 I t 1 I t I t t I t 1 1 f I 1 { , , 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1_ �Lu�j1{..Li .. +- w:.�i0.. .'.CLt+..1V.sla .: �. • I4'AS.. • +iiAJf ,•.N. �:. .x� ►..... .,. ....ticr � .+ .w.b .., .. •'� .. r ,....K . ., y ,.. ... I I 1 .n M. 1 I I I 1 r, t ... I 1 . � 1 1 f t 1 ,.. .,' t 1 1 1 f I 1 •. 1 1 1 I 1 � ,Y 1 I 1 1 t t I 1 I 1 I 1 ... 1' A 1 .. .... t 1 I t + 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I .. t 1 1 1 t ._ I 1 t I I I 1 1 .. I 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 I .. 1 1 I 1 1 . . t 1 1 1 1 1 1 nn .. t I 1 1 1 c•.._ t I ( .. ., t ( 1 1 I I 1 1 1 t I 1 t 1 I 1 I •, .. I 1 1 1 ..t 1 • . 1 1 •..f. a •.: 1• .. ., 1 1 I I ... I I 1 1 t ..... I 1 t I I I I v •_ 1 I 1 I 1 t .., : a:. *;,. 1 I t , V i . t 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 t 1 1 t I t 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 , 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN PF,EM1 OTHERI FWT PEN. DF_D HCMA EGC ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P RE M O T H E R* STATE PEN R E S D F C M P C R U N UNION ION BO N DS M P A. NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 171 ^ c P c 1200 21rj1' 44 ' I i i i i i '�4,_� I 2 ::: Ia SG 10 i i i t 1 1 '�'68 _,� , ` I I �C1" 1 _0 I• 26424 I i I i I i :1 i 14711 1 i 1 8 1 55 I 13 (-,O j 1 1 1 1 �:r'' .,t_i0 1 - 155 1600 24672 PERALF DF CMP FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0 4 1 6 DIV. NO. 0000000 CITY OF MAPLEWI-_ Ot) PAYROLL JOURNAL 1 CUTOFF DATE 11/2 PAGE 1 INITIAL 6 LAST NAME HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME F ' �; E M 1 O T H E R 1 FWT PEN D E H C M A EF� G ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M 2 O T H E R r S' T A T E PEN R S D F C M F C' R UN UNION BONDS MBA NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS 1 1 7 1 N C4 n _ r �. RAB I NE J. 7 00 . 7556 1 , 1 , , , I , 1 44 8• 1 6 7 6 r , 1 ' 44,15 1 1 1 1 1 I. 3j l 110 .aT7 406 0183 10.480 ' 1 ' I �00 8184 ' 1 � I i ; 74423 : : : 7ic:5 i25ti67 1 i 5 c�7 : > S 1 S 1 0 ; ; : : : : : ; 71 92 1 DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 ' ' 1 I ' ' i I PENAL DF 1 d MP 1 1 1 1 I I > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 4400 8 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 ' FLS 0 STAHNKE, J. 5100 X00 60103 5085 1 600 1 8136 + 000 , 124404 I , 1 9 91 4 37 3Tt98 1 9174 33 85 1 126100 1 7125 i + 1 + 94949 525120 406 0322 10.170 > M 2 -M 2 0 $00 81;36 : : : : 1�$ : 6719 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL : : : : : : : : : : PEAL DF GMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV I 1 I I I I 1 1 ; FLS YER S BO , 24'00 23790 1�S 12449 3ci : : : 406 0389 9.150C 46 00 42 600 71 20 ; ; : : 51160 : : 1 7;25 1 1 ; 1 1 54 t ?... s p s :.p...:,.. p 1 1 1 : I : 1 � t � 1 t � I : 1 PENAL DF C:MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL : : + ' > WEEKS 2 ST O V `-� 2100 7J20 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 FLS 0 SARAFOLEAN, J. 7600 5$448 : : : : : : 906 30118 9174 i � � � � + 7545 491154 406 2990 8.140 : : 600 65'12 200 24:4 - 1 : 4u66 I 2$135 1 1 1 1 1 + t , ' 1 > S 0 S 0 0 ._ 1 _ , . 1 t , I 1 , f 1 , 1 I , + I , 1 1�8 1 1 1 1 7 51276 1 1 t I 1 , 1 PEgAL DF , , GMP , + ,.. . 1 �.. ,' I >. x , 1 , > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 1 1 , + 1 + + 1 ' > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 600 612 ' F L S 0 1 RYAN M. 1. 7 1 127 L52 ► : 1 : 1 : I : 1 : , : I 17`- 79 1 120115 I 45116 1 1 I 1 + 406 4801 17.660 1 1 6 00 141;28 : i : : 9 -05 :. 3492 38:3:00 : : : : 640 p I 1 I I t I I I 1 1 1 FERIAE DF 1 GMP 1 I + + ti DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 600 7064 I ! 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 ( I 1 FLS O NELSON, K. 1 42100 1 44456 32040 1 I 1 600 1 1 8444 1 + 1A00 1 I 1924 + 1 I 1 ,1 14659 6461 r .1 42i42 + 1385 487100 1 7:25 , 1 � 1 1 � , + 1060'4 ry , Zt 1194 406 5919 10.680C. 3000 l �s. - 793 I :...d 1 1 1 > Is 2 .. s. .< y . 0 .•... , ..: � _... , � , � � t � : : : : PEgAL DF d MP > DAYS 10 ANNUAL � I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 t FLS Cj THaLEN, S. 7200 1 756156 : 1 800 : 11100 17�9Z , 1 : + 1 32i ' 41 61110 41 :01 1 6:75 I 23135 1 400100 Ti2 ; : ; : : 10c5117 279198 406 7030 10.480C SJ84 138 1 t TA82 > S 2 S 2 0 , , , , 1 + PE4L DF CAMP % ;11 DAYS' 10 ANNUAL WEEKS 2 ST OV F L zj 01 FLAUGHER, J. 5A00 55536 : : : + + , r 138 , : 121:58 3815 , 165 , , 50+00 ► , 712:5 t 1 I 1 1 , , 1 + 1 1 1 95 369 1_ 6106 406 7236 10.680 1 1 8 85 1 1 1 , 57166 I 1 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 1 > S 2 S 2 0 2400 21d60 1 1 t 1 t 1 , 6,4 14 1 1 1 PE9AL I DF C+MP I ' > DAYS 10 ANNUAL I I I I I I , 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 600 8544 HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN P F� EMI G T H E R 1 FWT FEN D E D H C M A E B C AD GRO S GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PREM OTHER STATE PEN RES" DF CMP CR UN UNION BONDS MBA NET SICK .1 -� �y J 4 6 110 0 5 2 d 5 T COMP. I I MISCELLANEOUS 1 I - I 4 1 ,C -� - 1 V ,01:: '7 1 0 7��t7 r` ,- _ 1 - - 3E. E. _.I 1 - 2. 7 ej (, r' I 1 1 1 1 L i8 1 Oi 5 () -, 8 1o0 7 -�:) 15 -• ' 6 400 69 5 A 57 - F ' 3 -A 51 1161 ' 1 '= 1 1 •1 ;� : '! '' 1 1 :j !t 3 2 l 145 1 : 4 25 U 1 1: 9 : 6 7 1 � 1 oi 3 9 :- PE:RALF DF L-Ml -' 0 0 717P74 ` FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0 5 0 1 DIV. NO. 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI O CITY OF MAPLEWtI %iD CUTOFF DATE PAGE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 PAYROLL JOURNAL PEN D E D H C M A 11/20/37 E B C it SICK INITIAL & LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME F P E E M 1 O T H E R 1 WT PEN D E H C M.A C:R UN UNION BONDS ML A ADJ. NET NET ADJ. GROSS ' ' NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M ' O T H E R S T A T E PEN R S T D F C: M C R UN U N I O N O N D S, E B C M 8 q ADJ. NET GROSS BARTA M. 50 1 0267 8.490 7400 611 ' ' ' I ' 000 67'91 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 c i r' 27172 r. ^ 21'66 T I I POP T 11M -A Vp 1 1) A b, I t T F I n R A III NET 1 6 } M 1 M 1 0 i i r ' i �1 '' 1 r 1 , ?t — ` 1, ' Z 5 1 � 2 7'170 19 7;25 i i 1 � 7 :7I'�5 2 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; ; ' ' 49 +AL X00 ' > WEEKS 2 ST OV PE DF C 1 ,> FLS 0 RAIDER K. s 501 6872 22.150 y 7:00 159180 ; 000 171,20 ' ' ' 18: 82 ; I 71,80 1 51' 50 .I I 1795,0 } S 9 S 9, ... 0 ; - +� 1 I 1 20 10� 12 ' 12467 ; 2 ,. 08 ' 812 00 1 t t , - 1 424,09 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 , PERIAL DF CAMP ` FLS O CHLEBECK, J. 7000 761;60 ' ' 1 10'x162 35 1187 501 8993 10.880 O } M 111 0 0 ' I ' 000 21;76 8 871 04 1 1 r 1 I , I ' t 51,59 1 13185 ' 143;00 ' 7,2 5 ' ; 1 i 1 i 884'125 458161 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL+ t' ' I I 1 18 1 6109 1 i I > WEEKS 2 ST OV PEkAL DF C'MP I 1 I 1 1 1 � FLS 0 1 1 I t 1 • ' ' ln± s+i++"43••;'4r9ca':e.: ':.:.. i,:.w.. �i.,,t .:, ° ... .o. • •e.. . ! , 1 1 1 1 � 1 I ' t . ... I ..... f ....,.z:.. • .. ,.. 1 1. 1 ( f 1 1 I I 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 1 � 1 a � � 1 I � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t t 1 ......�; .. .:�s�Lf :...•sfi`x•'r :..;,,,a4,..... 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 1 f ;• f . I 1 t 1 f + 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I + I 1 1 1 1 .. , ,....1 I 1 1 1 1 I ..: I I 1 ! ..,,a., .1 �,. . 1 1 { 1 I 1 1 1 ! 1 I ... ..,:- •'x :s ...ti•,e.. - .. .t.sa::a.:.. ..:.�., .. ....r. 1 w ... • . 1 ! 1 1 .. , 1 1 1 1 ' 1 t 1 I 1 ! I I 1 1 .. 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 • + 1 1 1 I I , + I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HOURS /EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS /EARN FWT REGULAR VACATION FAMILY DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 O T H E R 1 PEN D E D H C M A E B C GROSS GROSS SICK HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS PRE ML 0THER- Si STATE' PEN RES DF CMP O C:R UN UNION BONDS ML A ADJ. NET NET 21 400 2967;68 ' ' c IF 2 'Qi t") 0 ;� --' 3 � 16 I 1 i 1 3 6 : i' 7 I , i i i 181 � 13 41%.- r 5 6 )' � ' ' 1 I ' ' ' ' ; 1 3372,8 _ + I , I 96 1 U4r6.� 1145100 141'5() i i i 116718 PERALF DF 'CMP I FUND NO. DEPt. NO. bIV. NO. 101 ( 00000000 - INITIAL 3 LAST NAME HOURS /EARN EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR CUTOFF DATE NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY MEYER, G. 54 T 707,72 502 0547 13.610 ' > M 1 M 1 0 t OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS > DAYS 10 ANNUA ' , > WEEKS 2 ST OV I ' I ( I FLS 0 KANE , M. 6,00 1001,'88 502 1241 14.520 d00 4 > M 1 M 11 . 0 ' 1 1 , > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 13 -MO 6543 1 '1� FLS 0 ; 56• ,0 0 ' 1 LUT2 D. 7400 9292 542 1431 12.860 23 24 r M 1 M 1a p _ ; > DAYS 10 ANNUA 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 204161 I > FLS 0 ; KLAUSING, H. 700 97592 502 3473 13.610 DF d MP } m 0 M ' 1 . > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 108'9 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 137',04 7.r'�19 I FLS CJ , $6100 HELEY, R. 5400 73416 502 4037 13.110 1 1 -- S 0 -- S 0 0 1' 866 : > DAYS 10 ANNUA t• c10 J ; > WEEKS 2 ST OV 7081 > FLS 0 1 OSWALD , E. 6400 591;36 502 4501 9.240 1 ' k S 1 S 1"... p � ) �'�' 1' Oy�S > DAYS 10 ANNUAL : > WEEKS 2 ST OV 115;65 552 1 FLS 0 : 4151'00 TEVLIN, JR.., H. 4d00 641;2$ 50 L 62 13.360 1 , > M 0 M 0 0 7;'36 . I > DAYS 10 ANNUA goo 1008 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 , • FLS O � I I , FREBERG, R. 5400 7211'05 502 62 54 13.110 1L00 14421 > M 3 M 3 0 �00 2922 DAYS 10 ANNUAL; : ; :y WEEKS 2 ST OV c ' 1 HOURS/EARN HOURS / EARN REGULAR FAMILY VACATION HOLIDAY SICK COMP. C I T Y O F PAYROLL M A P L.E 141- I U D JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE PAGE HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOLIDAY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 G T H E. R 1 FWT FEN D E H C M A ADJ. GROSS E L-s C: COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M = 0 - T H E R f2 STATE PEN R S D F C M C R U N U N I 1 1 N D O N D S ADJ. NET GROSS M G A -n I e - _ _- r+ n NET I 400 10088 �� 13 -MO 6543 44174 � 1,25 1�`-s5 ; 56• ,0 0 1 1 1� 7;c.5 , � 1 1 �5 1 X00 23 24 1 8. ; 75 sq ; 1 204161 1 1 4 00 -1 5/ -8 I I 1 PEkAL DF d MP d00 114 16 1 :5 108'9 137',04 7.r'�19 47!64 i 1 20182 33j46 , $6100 �' ' i ; I I19tJI'�►F 1 d4 1' 866 : : t• c10 J ; ; 7081 PER:AL DF C:MP � ) �'�' 1' Oy�S : 115;65 552 1 4 11 1 1' 30166 231 : 4151'00 : : 7iL5 : ; ' ; � 104C1� L 7;'36 . I : I 2100 I 1' 1 1 274 96 PER1'AL DF C:MP X00 i � ' $ ' : ; 13G44 641 :2 $$121 1 28:66 1385 215:00 :L5 1 t r 1' 110 I 1 , 1 d8 �.. 4 1 , 7 , , 1' 555102 PEgAL DF C : 1 00 ) 0488 � ; 1 1 I 1 18 : 6 43 43+01 1 311'61 131'85 : ; ?;..5 ; 1 1 1 , 1075113 .,.. 1400 222 1 �$ , T. 61 �.. ; 1' 1 ,� ; 1' 2 f 7 d�51 PEgAL DF CM d00 7492 : 1 : I : 87;90 : : 42 41 30137 : 6:75 2G00 : : 7 i� 5 ' ; : 1 r 7591'2 9 I gl Op $0116 I 13 8 I 1' <,:. 5 X1 81 .... s ...:: 1 1 , 1 51 1.:7 9 PER:AL DF C:MP ' ' 800 10688 1 1 I 188 E 14Ch'82 I .� 431'$1 10 1 , 1095113 ' 1600 22b1'24 ; : Cl 1' i 1' ( ` 1' 1' 1 1 1 745 0 1 , PER1'AL DF CI'MP 1 , , 1 I 800 10488 1 + , 1 1 , , ; , , 1 I 1 991 15 1 1 5711 1 , 42 1 1 6175 I 3318 : 1 350100 I 1 71 5 381130 1 I : ; I 106 L 5,77 '- ' 41'00 5456 13>3 1 751'72 : ; � � 1 , 1 1 � K) 1 PERiAL DF CiMP I I I HOURS /EARN FWT DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS MISCELLANEOUS NET 1 FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0502 DIV. NO. 00000000 CITY OF MAPLE -*I !!D CUTOFF DATE 11 /20/87 PAYROLL JOURNAL PAGE 2 0 4 INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS /EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN HOURS /EARN , ", F F� E M 10 TH E Ft 1 FWT PEN D E H C M A E D C ADJ. GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE FAMILY OUBLE TIME ADJ. NET GNOT NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS .- P - OT ,, '- S. TATE _ 't PEN R � TDF C:MPC:R UN ' UN UNI ti BONDS M S CASS W. 74,00 133 1:2 8 i i i i i 1 2:::71 c, /.91 366 :32 1497��6 502 8314 18.4900 dOO 141,92 19 i 16:346 300 ZOU i i i 6 0 05 8 ? M 3 M 3 0 t 10449 i I I I l 1 1 I > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEF4AL DF CI'MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV I 1 I 1 1 I 1 F L S 07 I l 1 1 I l 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 l l I I I t I I 1 1 l l I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I t 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I ! l I l I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I l l 1 1 I I 1 1 I t ! 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 l l 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 t I 1 I I 1 t 1 1 ( I • ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 A Y. l I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 • . R.J I 1 I ( I I 1 1 I , 1 I ! I I I ( 1 t 1 .1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I ! 1 1 I 1 I l I I I 1 1 1 ' I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 t l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 l l l I l f 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 4 1 I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I •1 1 1 I HOURS /EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M I OTHE 1 FWT PEN D E D H '- Il A E D C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M 2 0 THE R r STATE PEN R E T D F C: M P C- R Lf N UNION L-: O N D � M D A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS n r - , _ r - , , , 5601 7634 7 ' 1 1 1. ' - I 11 6 l_ 1 4.1�:,�'I 17 - : 4 ��T I t t I 9947tic0 1400 18 -4,77 7,2 9751'2 8 :50 11313 � i � J 7 1,17 1' 3 li'o0 54i7� 3:3. 1 0 i i 4273, r;l - .- •� .- - l 1 1 - �s 11Jb�i� 400 5788 PERALF DF CMP FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 051 8 DIV. NO. 0 0000000 CITY OF MAPLEWCICID PAYROLL 'JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 1 1 / 21 0 / 1 7 PAGE 1 INITIAL d LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R L M 1 11 T !-i E Fl 1 FWT PE N D E H C: M A E L-. C: ADJ. GROSS GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS F'REM '-OTHER'' L Q N CA ADj4 ':, , ATE PEN R�TDF C'MFC - .R UN UNION PONDS, MP.A q DJ. NET NET ELIAS, J. 6100 9655 ; 1111 4. =;55 10;15 I 121 416 503 1010 14. 870C 700 10409 _ dOO 1106 1 1111 1 ; 6 c'_ j ''l:30' S i 712 I $67161 > M 4 M 4 0 8412 .r DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; PEF4AL DF dMF' 1 1 1 WEEKS 2 ST OV I 1 , ., FLS OT 1 I 1 1 1 f - PECK, D. 4100 59480 1 1 1 I 1 1 I � 14: 1 ' 4E414 1 141 1 i , i , i 1 i ► i , ,1 120345 503 1688 14.870C 3;00 471814 d00 1 1 d96 1 1 1 1 766 1 27170 100100 7195 1 1 1 71550 M 1 M! 0 i i i i i i 1 �$ I r I 81�Ct? f 1 I I 1 1 1 1 f DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEF= L DF C > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS G PRIEBE, W. 4E�00 68T36 1 ' I I � 1 1 1 I ' 1 1 195:31 47167 ' 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1191167 503 2522 14.320C 2400 34J68 d00 11456 1150 3 22 i i 7T '' -, +t�� f 384' L'.5 -: 1521V0 7125 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 58 416 1 1. S 1 S i_ p 820 DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 PE4L DF C1MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV f FLS G 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 IRISH, B. 7u00 119 1 60 L 1 I I 1 I 1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 17;13 I 53'70 I 21'14 1 I 1 ' ' I ' ' I ' 1342 503 3185 16.550C 300 13u40 i i i i 7b32 i 19100 1 210 i i i 958170 > M 5 M. 15-.. ,.. 0 + + ( 1 1 1 d 4 1 I 9 1 I I 1 + + 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I PE4L DF CI MP I 1 I 1 I I WEEKS 2 ST OV �y 1 FLS d GESSELE, J. 74.100 1 1051120 1 1 i i i i 71184 52153 16'00 i i i i i 1313125 503 4671 14.600 I I I 3 00 1 11680 400 ' 13L40 + 1 1 ' I, _ 6d33 1 1 I 7685 1 7''25 1 i r 930170 ? M 8. M 8.-.--.0 _... � _. � � � ,.. � 1 138 i 9':175 � 1 1 300 i 1 i 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PERI AL I DF C:IMP I 1 1 1 1 WEEKS 2 ST O1/ > FLS 0 GE ISSLER, W. 6400 t 95L68 I 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' 14 149 1� 55128 301 77 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1381189 503 6109 14.870C 400 + 11496 1 400 11d96 800 17844 I 1 7c10 i 163'E,5 1 7125 50'00 13100 i 74584 p , 1 1 ( 1 +...: 1 - +. 1 , i J�7. 1 t 9 461 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL + 1 1 i i i ► i i i PE4L DF c :i MP �+ > WEEKS 2 ST O V I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 FLS G T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 ) 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 + 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P Fi E M 1 0 THE R 1 FWT FEN D E D H C: M A E C• C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS VACATION SICK HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R EM 2 0THF. STATE PEN R E'::j DF C:MP C: UN UNI POND:= ML•A NET COMP. MISCELLANEOUS r-+ r �- r� , 1 36 1;0 71;00 I 1 5 :119 104' 57 I I 1 4..100 1 1 �. 7 r 1;164 1 I �- 10+a 1 1 :j ., 1 I ' 1 1 1 , 7 c•_:J �. 1 : _. 4 •' �+ - . i — :1 �:i 10 _ :` 5 i 1j 0 �� : =i I ;:: �i 5 lair G I :.1��i 1 DI a ` t - i 764713: 4 0 '�:ir� F, PER ALF DF C:MF=' 1 , 1 FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 05 Div. NO. 00000000 C I T Y O M A P l._ E W 0 i _I D CUTOFF DATE 11/20/87 PAGE 2` , PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & -- � LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS / EARN HOURS /EARN EARN P R E M 10 T H E 1 1 FWT PEN D E H C: M A ADJ. GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME E B C ADJ NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME F' Fi E M - LI T H E fi '� T A T E PEN R S T D F. C M C R U N U N I C1 N$ O N D S M C� A MISCELLANEOUS NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. - , ,.• r- Q LOFGREN, J. 7400 75048 ; ; ; ; 74; 4 3ti 30: ; I I I I f 504 3775 10.540 ! , 00 r. 8432 450 3' 53 t ' 1 1 , r - - 4::.00 I 1 � 13 S I 327,00 t 7 5 I , , I 89F.rt'S$ 30 0 id 4 > M 3 M 3 0 , 1 I 1 i i 1 8 61'93 i i i i i 3'�5 i } DAYS 10 ANNUAL I 1 + I PERyAL DF C'MP ? WEEKS 2 ST OV > FLS 0 � � � � i � � � i - � i i i i � i I i 1 i 1 • I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 F I 1 1 1 I I •J 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • , , ! 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 �c�.:<- .xw�•.:. ..::mow:.:.: ,.ry., .:.._, _: • . .,».,._,_., �,.W. r. S: ._ .,.,y .:.�.. ... . • I 1 ..,.:... 1 .. I + 1 + + + 1 I I , I 1 1 I � 1 + + ( 1 + I I 1 I + + 1• I I + I I + 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 ( 1 1 I 1 •1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I ! 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 , I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ! 1 1 I 1 I ( I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 OTHE FWT 1 PEN D E D H C M A E F. G ADJ GROSS GROSS VACATION SICK HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M: OTHER STATE: FEN R E D 'T D F C: M P C R UN UNION BONDS MPA ADJ. NET NET COMP. MISCELLANEOUS r -, Kin r . r, ti 7400 I 75F;; -, 1 I ( 1 1 7 "�f :r - , r : -� 6 .- , (..�1 �� 1 1 r�, 8 9 6 b :+ 1 I r' =loo A^I � � yy � '11 3L �1 o J � +, �} 3 I 1 ( 4 I -I �J U I .:1' =� 3 Z 7 0 0 7 1" 5 + 1 1 r 3 0 Oil 4 .. PERALF DF C:MP FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 06 01 DIV. NO. 00000000 CITY OF M A P L E W CI CID CUTOFF DATE 11 121 0 /$ PAGE J PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL 3 LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E. M 1 Ij T H E h� ]. FWT F' E N r) E +-i r�. M A EEG ADJ. GROSS GROSS NO. REPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P K E IYI 6 " O T i E: R'� r T' T• E PE N I% :� T D F C: ICI .( •.. ; . : R UN , UNI B O N D S MBA A ADJ. NET NET ODEGARD, R. 37;00 78c 7 5 1 1 I 1 1 r " t1c ,` J r'' ,. �'� -�''`' 4 A ,� �, S �' .�la , hl I'l 1 ' 1 1 1723:01 601 0389 21.250C ; ; >a00 I 17100 1 I I 1 1 2. l) �f 113 Ut0 > M 3 M 3 0 3400 T4175 , 1 , ' I ' 1 ••- �0 2 DAYS 10 ANNUAL PENAL DF dMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 1 F L U $RENNER, L 7 00 76 96 '1 i '1 ; 7';6 9 3�O 1 141 '1 9 0 &Z •c 601 1066 10.660 1 1 400 8 X00 2 3y04 ' I 1 , ,. 1 �c,79 I ! ,, 1r�5 r . I _ cSI�,UO 7125 1 1 I 1 1 I o 26219 E > M 1 M 1 O i '1 '1 i '1 '1 18 1 6 4 3 4 i i 1 1 t 1 1 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PENAL DF GM t 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV I I 1 I 1 5 (JI o I.) FLS 0 7 I 1 t 1 KRUMMEL, B. 1 I 31;54 14157 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 i 1 ; , i 1 36411 601 1993 8.820C 400 3d28 i i '1 '1 1 d63 '1 3492 75100 5145 16 3 > M 0 M 4 0 492 2404 . ..:,.. DAYS 10 ANNUAL PE4L DF GIMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 1 1 3c 50 321193 %� FLS G STAPLES, P. 7 O0 121 d . �5t i 87 '1 54+69 9 5 '1 I '1 1 1 1 '1 1367124 601 2618 16.8617 1 1 d00 13488 i i 9: 23 i 18146 197'100 2100 i 1 1 63 9120 > :.g 11. g .1.._ t, O 1 d4 i 97;n6 '1 '1 1 1 .. , . :n..•...1 :;.:. t i DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I I I I I 1 1 PERIAL DF GI MP 1 1 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV ' FLS d 1 I 1 o�..+ .:.c :9.. ; . +..�.4;.� . .e. .JY. , ryf,.•.. ♦ ... .. • ... .,.. •. .... t 1 .�., . S. I 1 t I 1 1 1 .. f _ t I 1 I 1 1 1 t I 1 ... 1 I t I I 1 t 1 1 1 1 � . . v . •.. f I ! I I 1 1 I .. f 1 1 1 I I t 1 I 1 ... f I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I f t I 1 I I 1 t .• .. f�•,_ 1 1 1 ! I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 :•.•1 .. f ... 1 1 I I 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 f I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 - f .. I I I 1 I 1 1 f 1 I 1 I 1 I ( I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I ... ' I 1 I I 1 1 t I I 1 ! 1 I ! 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 . ' 1 I 1 1 1 1 .. f 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I ( 1 ' 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 I I 1 I t 1 1 t I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I j 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 .. 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 F I I i 1 ' 1 I 1 I I t 1 1 1 I I 1 { I t 1 1 t 1 1 I I I I 1 I t 1 1 t 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 t t I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 t 1 I 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I t 1 I 1 1 i I 1 t 1 I 1 I t 1 1 1 ! I 1 1 ! 1 f.. 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 f 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t ...:.. 1 t I t I 1 1 t 1 t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 ...r...;«_ f I I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 f t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... + 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I 1 1 1 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P k E M 1 LI T H E Ft 1 FWT PEN D E D N i�: M A ESC ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION SICK HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M L O T H E R n STATE P E: N R E � IMF r;� C M P C: r R U N •, - , UN I fa N BONDS , M A NET Is 100 I 27E%A 13 1 I 5 17.111 9 11• DRAW 43541 1... ( 6 1 1 2 �.. 4: I :JO0 1 • y i � :� 0 4 I I I r• 1 � I 1 I 2 5446 �� r - �� 1 1 1 '� :.j •� 1 I 5 � ...1 �_� ...._I ._I t i I 1417 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 219 611 3 I PERALF DF C:MF' FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 060 DIV. NO. 00 CITY OF M A P L- E hl I) CI D CUTOFF DATE i l /LO /87 PAGE 24 PAYROLL JntlRNAl INITIAL b LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS /EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN FAMILY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME F R E M 111 T H E R 1 FWT PEN D E r H C: M A E B C ADJ. GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M r tu r� 0 T H E R. S T• A T E PE N R � T D F C: M P C: R U N U N I O N B O N D S MLA ADJ NET GROSS NET SWANSON, JR. , L. 600 66560 I I I ; ' =>S 3.7C; 1191 1 1 1 10 65 3 10.400 $00 8 464 400 I' 4 -q 4.- 1 C' 1 =' 5 : + 7;25 + : : : 84414 < > M i M 1 0 : I : , 1 6(124 6( I I : : 5$ l t > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PER'AL DF C,MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS c U 1 1 I WILLIAMS, M. 3 7 602 1998 4.750C ' ' ' ' ' 1 I I ; - -, , ; ; + 1 34210C [91A5 > S i S 1- O ; ' + + I 9/,1� + 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PE DF CiMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 7. 34,00 FLS 0 TRAVERS, D.- t 1 'y 4.250C 60�. 2111 9 & C > S 1 S 1,.. p 11 36 ; ' ' :.� L• 9114 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEkAL DF C :MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV 200 950 FLS 0 - ANDERSON, R. 5100 6607 ; ; ; ; ; ; 1 16;66 40152 68;63 ' 1013105 602 3790 12.490 110 237,31 d00 9992 : : : : 5%-'S 6 : &.5 : T125 1 1 632:75 1185 67',53 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEkAL DF C'MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV ' FLS 0 L I NDORFF, D. 500 636199 117;38 40165 10 : : : 1 t : 1 1016:17 602 3915 IZ.490C 1X00 21 3 000 99{92 6 13:35 3500 7 : 7b0 : 639197 > - Q..A .. p . ; ; .... f,:. ..:. 4 00 - 508 131$ ; 71;9, : : ..:.. ;.. . ,__ ; :.::_ : Mi S•�12 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEF�AL DF CiMP ' ' '`� > WEEKS 2 ST OV FLS O MULVIHILL, M. 1 { 1 120:00 602 4074 5.000 1186 1,74 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL I I I 1 1 PER:AL DF CiMP > WEEKS 2 ST 0V 2400 12d00 1 1 1 FLS 0 YUKER, W. 1'104 : : : i : : : 81:00 602" 4097 4.5000 1 1 I : : : : ; 1;5(l : : : : : : : 77 9 > m 0 m 0. 0 1117 :. > DAYS 10 ANNUAL t 1 1 I FERIAE DF C MP : r .. > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 1400 81 1 , 1 F L S 0 T l I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 HELEY, R. 6400 83904 �85 1 1 4Z'51 : : : : 1 1 : I 1062:65 602 4121 13.110c d00 10488 d00 10488 6 v2 7i25 744$ > M i N 1 0 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 1 1 I : PE DF Ci > WEEKS 2 ST OV c 1 1 1 HOURS /EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME FWT ADJ. GROSS GROSS VACATION SICK HOLIDAY COM OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS ADJ. NET NET I 1 t 1 I 1 ( 1 ( 1 1 1 1 FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0 0 olv. N o. 0 0 0 0 0 �� G 0 CITY O F M A P L E W 1.! I :I D CUTOFF DATE 1 1 0/ 87 PAGE J L PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST. NAME HOURS /EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 O T H E R 1 u F W T P E N D E D F I C M A E E--' C ADJ. GROSS GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M 2 0 T H E: R- i " A T E f= E N R T ti F C: r� F �_: R U N U N I U N F N D S M G A ADJ. NET NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - C - 41 : ,:. • - -. - , : , P MARUSKA, M. 7' 00 104 44 q ' 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 , 1 x'71 1 - . - - 47;20 _ 10.1'k - ''901 �- i i � i � 11$�a�� 6vc: 55 G6 14. 5 2 0 ' , ' , X 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 , I I 1 I I 7 'x' ._. 7 ��- ; 4 4 6 i 2i0 i l .--.1 I r' 74•x,61 " .0 M 0 0 ' 1 I , ' 1 ` 1 ' I ' I 1 4 ' 1 x '30 `- i i i i i 4:50 I 1 DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' 1 ' I ' I ' 1 ' t ' I 1 ' I ' I PENAL DF dMF' > WEEKS 2 ST OV �> FLS O I 1 I I I I I I BURKE, M. 7`00 97 92 i 1 $ i 13 1112 44;1 1 341 i i i i i 1 10A6 60 7219 13.610 i i 40 0 10$88 i i i 6: = ;�;�; i i 62(x00 7;25 i 13;00 i 5+50 7 ,? M1 O N 0 0 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 76 i i i i i 4;5 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i PENAL DF GMP > WEEKS 2 ST O V 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 t 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I ( 1 > FLS 0 GERMAIN, D. 6400 8504 i i i i 1 8 i 137;21 4: 56 2r ,'25 i i + i i 10$S+8 . 602 8182 13.360 ' I ` { 400 10488 i i i i 6� i :33 I 1 I 1 1 13dOO 7 I I 1 1 4120 1 1 1 594+2 M 0 M O- 0 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 I doo 11112 I 1 I 1 7.5'$4 I t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I > DAYS 10 AN NUAL 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 , 1 1 I I I I I 1 I PENAL 1 DF CaMF' 1 1 1 1 1 { I I t { > WEEKS 2 ST OV > F L S O Ap� • ,7F.. i,:,.,t�e;w..... _.... y tcs:a,:... ... .. ... ., I 1 1 1 1 I t I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 �. _. I ., 1 I I I I 1 t ! 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 t 1 I ► I 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 . ..•� 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t t I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I t I I { t I 1 1 I I I ( 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t .. 1 1 I { 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I ( 1 1 I t I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 , . 1 .. 1 I I ( I 1 1 ! 1 1 I I ( 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 .. ....1 1 t I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 ( I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I ( 1 1 ... 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I I I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I .. 1 I 1 1 1 ( ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I t 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 t I 1 I I 1 1 1 { 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 { { 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 { . 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 ! 1 ! ,. 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I f I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 ! 1 I 1 1 I I I t 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 I t I I I I 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 t 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I ! I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 t 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I t 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 { 1 1 { { 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 - • 1 1 1 r { { ( 1 1 1 { I 1 I { { { { 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 { 1 I { 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT FEN D E D H C M A ED C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M 2' O T H E R Z STATE PEN R E S D F C M P C R UN UNION E-: 0 N D S ME: A. NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS r• 1-_+ 97 c 0 1 1 '- 44000 56 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 4 115 ) I ill 163 -I .. ..� ;�'��:1 ::• 1- , 17.E "3 r 1 I t 1 I 7 944 1 46 5 00 63 36 5(a��0 71 { i i i i 451]63 i ':�'aU1 7; - 45 ' 5 i .I_ %;6 0 1 I 1 4617:81 PE:RALF DF C:MP 1 FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0 603 DIV. NO. 00000 C I T Y O F M A P L E W O O D CUTOFF DATE 1114 / PAGE t 87 C �� PAYRC)LL .inn lPhiAl INITIAL 3 LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/ EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 10 THE R 1 FWT P E N D E H C: M A E B C ADJ. GROSS GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M '- - O T H E R A r '' STATE - A r= E N R 't D F != M P r+ r - C R UN q . UNION �; O N D S MBA ADJ. NET NET STRAUS L. ' ' ' ' ' i i ' : -n I - F I ; i I , , , DRA , 44163 603 0170 5.250 ' ; ; ; 44,63 > S O s 0 0 : : : : : i : : : : : : > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEF�AL DF C'MP I , , > WEEKS 2 ST OV ' , I 1 ' I ' , q50 ti 4163 i ' FLS U SHELDON, L. ; i : Fi 1)0 381x+30 603 1518 4. : 33:14 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; PEFc;AL DF C'MP > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 8 0 3._'80 1 = FLS OT - HANNEGAN A. 603 2012 9.00010 63: 00 ,, 62:09 > ...S 0 S 4 0 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ,91 PEF�AL DF C I MP > WEEKS 2 ST Ovi 1100 6100 : FLS OT COLLINS A. r ' I ' r r I ' , I , I r I , ; , ; r 3 010 603 2981 4.000 ' r ' r ' ' ' ' ' I r r r , 2 9 6 >.. s 0 s Q... 0 I > DAYS 10 ANNUAL I 1 44 I I PE 'A RI L DF C,MP I ..,.. +:.. _ -.�. > WEEKS 2 ST OV ; ' I ' ' ' I 1,50 3000 r FLS O J OHANEK , T. 1 603 3495 5.100 1 a�o ).: -o -,s o o • .i• :: °'3..•� n rt .M - •!.H I.. . +T N.• r , L. r .. • . r .. r 9 i 4 • • . t ... � ... r .. • .. I • r r I , .: : .t. .. ...: w+ .a +Jf•Ii1'1.� : > DAYS 10 ANNUAL r I PERIAL . f DF C IMP , rtt. , r r.. .. . r. •i..... � ... . , > WEEKS 2 ST O : i : : 400 1 020 r I 1 '• FLS 07 WARD, R. : : : : : : : 4 17 1426 406:40 603 4246 5.080 1 ��3 : : i : : : : 30 2:6 8 N M 0 M 0;--.1. 0 _..> .,, '. 1 . ... 29(06 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEIuAL DF C :MP > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 81100 40440 ' FLS O �TAUBMAN D. t 7 00 934156 : : : : : � � 94212 '� 42 :2 � I 3' 307 � : � : ' : ' , � r 10566 603 6422 12.980c d00 10184 : : : : 55� 3. 4 : 1814 675 2;00 : : : 59130 > N-3 M 3 0 ; i : ; ; 146 ; 7:20 : : i 1150 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL : : : i i i : ► : PERiAL DF CiM > WEEKS 2 ST OV • ;- FLS O , I I I I I I i i i i : : � i : : ADAMS, N. : : : : : : : ' 1 r I r : 35:00 603 9694 5.000 34:49 > s 0 s 0 a r r r r r , > DAYS 1.0 ANNUAL i i i i i i : ' I ' I ' I ' PERIAL ' DF C l > WEEKS 2 ST OVT C - 00 3.51'00 I 1 , HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS /EARN FAMILY H OURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 OTHER 1 F1NT PEN D E D. H:MA . E D C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M` G THE R2 STATE PEN R E � r D F C: M P tC R U N UNION BONDS C A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - r•� l r_ C _, , I T 179: nRAW 700 C L 73 56 , 1 I I I I �1 1443,?) `- '_'I •- -' �-{ ��, � � 7 I I 1 I 1 , I , 1 1 • ` -. 16 � 41�.! 9 I I 1 1 q 1004 i i i i 7 1 12 3 i 1 ;46 x51 t:00 : : : 5 76) d I I I 1 I 1 , I I 1 PERALF DF C•MP I e I r FUND NO. DEPT. NO. DIV. NO. CUTOFF DATE 1 1 / 0 / S 7 PAGE 7 ` 101 0604 00000000 CITY OF MAFLEI�Ii II 1) PAYROLL JOURNAL _ INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME F fi E M 10 T H f k 1 FWT FEN D E I E� C: M A E E• C ADJ. GROSS GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M LI T H E R' 'S T A T E PEN R DF CMF C:Fc UN UNION Dr�ND � MGA AOJ. NET NET NO. DEPS MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I - r _ r_. F 1 T GREW, J. 7 00 79056 1 1 1 1 1 U ; 1 t)�y '5 j�69 1 i i i � i 8 9225 604 0508 10.980 1 X00 81, 84 1 1 ; 5,:146 1 1 1 7;`5 1 I I 62 7180 > S 2 S 2 0 6180 I t I I ( 1 1 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' I ' 1 ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' F'EF�AL DF CI MF t t 1 1 1 I 1 I I > WEEKS 2 ST O U 1 ► 1 1 I I 1 , 1 � I I I I I FLS 0 I 1 CONNERS, K. i i i i i i i 1(: 69 ld56 i i i i i i 263193 604 2560 6.590 i i 400 2436 i i i � 4;�6 i 11'54 i i i i i 20ab i > M 1 4 ,1 O i i i i 49 1 i i i i i i i i > DAYS 10 ANNUA 1 I , I , I , I 1 , I , I , 1 , 1 I PENAL J DF GMF 1 I 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 t 1 t I 1 1 1 r 3� 00 23065 > FLS 0 1 1 I HORSNELL, J. i i i i i i i 4435 17iS4 i i i i i i 446:12 604 4624 10.980c 1 463 1 16:9 i 0 5 45 i i i 309:03 >:' M 0 M O.. 0 1 :.. 1 1 , I 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 49 1 I 1 31,90 I 1 1 I I (� 1 I 1 f > DAYS 10 ANNUA 1 I 1 I 1 ( t I , 1 , 1 , 1 , I , 1 1 1 PEFLAL 1 DF dMP 1 I I 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 I t 44100 43y20 > FLS 0 HUTCHI NSON, A. i i i i i i 619 1 37161 1429 i i i i i i 382E 4 604 4942 8.530 1 1 1 I d00 6424 1 1 I 1 I t t 1 1475 1 t 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 , I 1 28C: �6, S.. . s ...1... -. 0 I .� �.o.. 1 .... R 1 ., ��, f f � ... 1 .. _., t 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 2 (1 3 S 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ( 1 t 1 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUA 1 1 1 1 1 I , 1 I 1 I 1 1 I , 1 I 1 1 I PENAL I DF GIMF 1 1 1 1 I > WEEKS 2 ST OV1 341 30718 f FLS O 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 X ..: .. - v .:+.:C• _.EMI"J�... .r wYN." J.+•.. ::. J U: . .- ..?•v:' , ..::.. �e4• . .: ., , 1 i .. , i✓it�'•r., v'C. 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 I x:... I .. 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 s!`. ., .r.t • s,-k 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 . " , _ ».� .. 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 .. . w �. I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ....1 .. , . 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ... ... . 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 f 1 _ .. 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 .N:' :I . .. 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I ......1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,..:-.. t .... I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I ( I .. ..-.. .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 .. 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 t 1 t 1 I t 1 I I 1 1 t I 1 I 1 I I I f 1 ., . 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 f 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 .. I 1 1 I 1 1 ( I I 1 1 I t 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 11 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I . .. ' I 1 ( 1 � 1 1 1 t t I 1 1 t , 1 1 1 .. 1 t 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS /EARN DOUBLE TIME F R E M 1 C1 T H E R 1 FWT PEN LI E D N C: M A E C C: ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME F R E M 2 OTHER' STATE PEN R E c D F CMF' C: R LI N UN I ON E 0 N D S M E-• A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS , - r rr 7 00 I 79056 I I 1 I I I I I 21 7 I 1 J_ I9L *A J1) 7 , I 1 1 1 1984154 2G00 18 I 1 1 1 e_ 71 10 + 1 ._d4 6 I I _I 1 :_1 70 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ,_I 14 +1 U 1 PERALF DF C:MP FUND NO. 1 DEPT. NO. 0 DI V. NO. 0000000 CITY OF M A P I— E N I'.I I] D CUTOFF DATE 11/20/87 PAGE 23 PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL & LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 O T H E R I FWT PEN D E H C: M A E B C ADJ. GROSS GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS PREM 20TFIER — I r- Ull S TATE ,—. ,_ PEN R�TDF TMn CM r r CR UN r UNION BONDS MBA ADJ. NET NET DOHERTY, K. 71;00 T3424 i i i i i ; 1 cj (;f 7 %- 2 I 8656 5 701.01 24 10. 170C X00 81,36 45 0 38 ; 4'= 42 ; 38'05 393,0 7;25 1 1743 5 > S 1 S 1 0 i i i i ; ; 1 $ 61,'D' 9 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; PEAL DF C;MP I I 1 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 I FLS 0 OLSON, G. 7(150 147909 i i i i i 'r'�'�r54 6e.,'O6 2 ' 17 01,4 8 701 0551 20.980C 1;50 31;47 0 167,84 ; 124,6 3 2:08 1076;15+ > M 0 - M 0 0 ; ; ; 2106 121,4 c > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEF�AL DF C;MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I > FLS 0 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 WEGWERTH, J. 2, 237,72 ; i , , , 2524 15('27 i i i ; i 3817 701 3174 8.490C 800 6 1 i i , X45 1 96100 ; 5,45 i i i 199:66 > M 0 M 0 0 ,_� 00 67,92 1 , 1 1 1 I I >� t , 27;30 1 1 1 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUA , I , I , , , I , I , I PER,AL DF Ct MP 1 1 I 1 1 > WEEKS 2 ST uV > FLS O L I V I NGSTON, J, , , ; ; ; i ; 3 89 14;52 363;0$ 701 8754 7.4ZOC 400 5,36 i i i i 11 , 2492 i 5,'45 1 246;'4 4 92 2.196 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1 I I I I t I I 1 I �-,I PEkAL DF C,MP 1 1 1 I > WEEKS 2 ST OVI 4U00 29480 > FLS 0 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I t t 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( f 1 1 ( 1 1 ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 • `iw .:rdw;:.. •.+.�••+.: - :..•:s.`i ..: axt ,.v..: _. .., 1 ....L• � .•.L:r 1 ..'... ,.• .+ . I ' - I ...:.,nr..l 1 .•., .. f 1 .... 1 .. I .. , , 1 ... .. 1 1 1 ..... ' ... .. 1 ... .. 1 ..a... ...va 1 .., ( ' ' I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 I 1 HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C: M A E C' C ADJ GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME PREM2 OTHER STATE PEN RED DF CMP CR UN UNION BONDS MC'A. NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS — n r+ r� C , 17450 2445 ; i i i i i 451134 130 47 50 3 3 1 2J) 2 150 31;47 3:;00 37448 2050 3 14 i , 19:16 , 1 _'4'85 i 1815 i i i 1694,E I F f-1 PERALF DF C:MP FUND NO. 101 DEPT. NO. 0702 DIV. NO. 00001 000 CITY OF . MAPLEWC11ID PAYROLL JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 1 1/ t 0/ 8 7 PAGE INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN FAMILY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 O T H E R F1NT 1 PEN D E I H C M A E B C ADJ. GROSS GR OSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M 2 O T H E R ; ST A T E PEN Rl.: D F C: Irl F C_: R UN UNI BON D S .MBA ADJ. NET NET NO. DEPS MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - 1 , _ . lW cF,7, wAQr _ EKSTRAND, To 6gOO 86836 ; ; ; - 1 1- ; 11 07;59 4 5�06 OR A 1126;44 702 7178 1 2. 770C l00 51;05 400 10 1 175 9099 1 ; 62 4 1: �5 151;00 7;25 633;3 K 3 M 3 0 DAYS 10 ANNUAL PENAL DF C;MP > WEEKS 2 ST O `l �- ��y FLS O 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1, 1 I i JOHNSON, R. 44 � 700 1 901,44 ( I ( , , , ( , 1 $ � , �- 1�7;�5 4Ca62 e45 ; ; ; 10145 702' 8505 12.520 i i 4 00 10416 i i i i 6 Z 5 i 15 0 0 45i'00 7125 i i i 63; 38 >- " o m a - o 7Z'00 400 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i i PEFt,'AL DF C:MP ? WEEKS 2 ST OV I 1 I 1 1 I ! I I ! 1 I I 1 I 1 1 �. FLS 0 f I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I ! 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 ( 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I ( 1 t 1 I 1 i 1 1 I I 1 ! I I I 1 I I t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! 1 I I t -. A � u,.'.. ;.,t �„. %� I ! I :a:•,.. I .... •.;.:hs..:.• � 1 1 1 1 :- �_ _..... f ' •..,... i 1 ( I I t . i I I I 1 ,,. 1 ... ' 1 I I 1 •e I ' I I 1 1 I I ! I I 1 1 .. 1 I I 1 1 t i 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 f I 1 1 I t 1 ' I I I I , I I 1 1 I I 1 1 ' 1 1 1 I I 1 ' 1 1 ., 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' � 1 1 . . :...:.:t„ . :pis .•:.., +�.+,..:; . +,:: - :.3 _.ita::r.:...a •+�:.� . ce.rs.f . . y . , i .. .. .1:+:.:� :. 1 ,.. I 1 l 1 1 I I , . �,. ..+:.w . . . , 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ... ,1 ( I 1 ( ! I 1 .... , . .. .. /: 1 1 ( 1 1 I I . 1 I 1 ( 1 1 I 1 .. .. .. f 1 1 I 1 t I 1 1 ! f 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I t 1 + I 1 1 ! I t .. 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ! HOURS /EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME P F{ E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C: M A E G C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M OTHER .- S T A T E PEN R E S D F C M P C: R UN UNION D O N D S M P A NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - 5 1� , 2 R -� 41 � +0 0 1 4 (.1 1 7 6 - 1 - 80 1 ' I 1 t I t 1 �� 1 1 2 t _ _ ;_; ._I �� �_� _ �: 7.1 c� I 1 1 I , 1 I 1 1 } 1 141 9 �� ��IO F J 110 1 /J��O j � �J 32 4 75 r 9 (� 9 I ( �y 1 � '�!� 7 I �, .: _I --'5 fi �y 1 '� 50 0 1 '�I_�I_) I_ _ I 1 I 1266, � V 8 PERALF DF C.MP . 11111111 to M, FUND NO. i O 1 DEPT. NO. 0703 DIV. NO. 00000,000 C I T Y OF M A P L E W i I O D PAYROLL JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 1 1 / *91 () / 8 7 PAGE 3 j INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS / EARN HOURS/EARN . %* F E E 14 1 G T H E R 1 FWT PEN D E I-i C M A E B. C ADJ. GROSS EMPLOYEE NO. RATE VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME P R E M 220 T H E R Sp T A T E PEN R _J D F C:111 C R UN UNION D O N D S MBA ADJ. NET GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I - ,- -. ,- ,, NET OSTROM , M. 7 00 1255j52 i i i i i 1 15 5 '65 1.2 1 1 i 1 i 1591;26 703 0677 17.160C ; ; X00 151,25 ; �• ; 9`51 1 F-; 6 40o 13:00 91 8'Z 7 > M 1 m 1 0 1� 4 I I --_ `� ' -1 I 5 7 I t I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I > DAYS 10 ANNUAL F'E�AL DF G;MF' I 1 1 I > WEEKS 2 ST OV F L S OT 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 CARVER, N. 7 00 941;04 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I ' I 1 5 1'70 `- I 4 38 $ 8' 1 4 i I i 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 I 105 703 1942 13.070C qOO 10456 4� 16 i 5000 i 7;25 7502 > M 7 m 7 0 .1 7.- 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ; ; PEF4AL DF C;MP > WEEKS 2 ST OV I I I I I I 1 t I > FL �+ S 07 ,;;.: ., ,.,..r .. •...., ._ .'... , ..� 1 ... f 1 I .. .. 1 1 I 1 I 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 i✓ s.r.4•!:. .• "...Jw .,- ..t..s . <a... _ . .. 1 1 1 1 1 t .. .:•, �a f.l '.: k 1 1 I 1 1 1 : ,,. .. �...... 1 1 1 1 I 1 . t I I 1 1 I 1 f ..• 1 1 1 t 1 I ., ., ..1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .. .... ' I 1 I I 1 t ' 1 1 1 1 1 .. ' I 1 I I 1 ' 1 1 1 I 1 ' I 1 I 1 I ' I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 t 1 1 I t 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1• 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 I t I 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 t 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 t I I 1 1 I I 1 t 1 I 1 I t t 1 t I 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C:1+1 A E E , C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P OTHER STATE FEN RE DF CMP C:R UN UNION E-'-0NDS MDA. NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I A D r+ I C A T N n T . E r WAY— 1 2 176' ( 1 I 1 I I 2:� it ���:J 9 1 1 1 F - , I I I I 1 24501 1 C 14 00 2 41, 0 4 i 13 6,16 1 ���; 7 =y4 i .. li : � 1 3, ' 0 0 i 16 I J I 1 I 1 - 1 I ( 1 1 I 1 I PERALF DF CMP 1 � FUND NO. 1 01 DEPT. NO. 07 04 DIV. NO. 0 0 0 0 01) 0 0 CITY O F M A P L E 14 1111_) D CUTOFF DATE 11 / '41 0 B 7 PAGE r PAYROLL JOURNAL INITIAL a LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS / EARN DOUBLE TIME F F, E M 1 l l T H E k 1 FWT PEN D E H C M A E B G ADJ . GROSS GRO S NO. DEPS. MARITAL S TAT US VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS PREM :0THER - ,� TATE - FEN R_ ThIn DF C:M r r� _ C:R UN UNION BONDS MBA ADJ NET NET WENGER , R. 6100 934' ; ; ; ; ; ; 1 1 "l f 4')90 1;44 i i i 1247 704 0776 14.600 $ 00 11 80 � � Ott 11c�B0 � 00 6 7U 1 i ; 6105 � f � 6-000 ; -� 7it5 1 1 1 72616E > M 2 M 2 0 8 t 1 I I ! t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ? DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i i PENAL DF C*P 1 ! t > WEEKS 2 ST OV I F L S 1 1 1 ( I 1 I I 1 1 I ( I 1 I 1 LA CA SE, C. I 1 1 t 1 1 t I r 7,94 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 , 1 23 5:OC 704 6255 5.000 190 i i i i i i i 217i7� > M ! M i .. 0 41 ! 1 ' A I 1 1 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL i i i i i i i t i PE F� L DF CIMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV I I 1 1 1 I 1 , 47;00 rr �3 a00 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 •. C :• FL..r 0 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 •— 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ..:.i....,.LV.... .'.:, '...,, ':.:. : .... I t .. ... •. 1 1 1 1 I 1 f I I . t 1 1 1 .. I 1 .. I 1 1 1 1 1 .. I I 1 I 1 1 f .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 t 1 t ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 - _ .wl. `. • ', .LV. f � . ..: . y ... 1 f: t1:. � _'K. I I ... I 1 1 I I 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 ... ... '. 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • N _..Ji]q :/ M'.F� +K..f/t :. JfF:1•. .1"•: V f1A'!-hiY...l I..• .,a•>:: _ ... bw�3,:.t ., . 1 1 -.. • - r..._ 1 .. .. 1 1 ao•s'. 1 1 .—, •.. . 1 .. f 1 1 _. ,a . I I ' _. ": f 1 1 s.» 1 • il... l.Lr. f• .. ! 1 �..�..,: I :4 .l. 1 f 1 1 I - /. I 1 I 1 1 ! f • f 1 1 1 1 • f ! I I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 �. �....: 1„ . 1 1 1 1 1 I f .. I 1 1 I 1 .A. rr •'.1.. .. fr' 1 1 1 1 1 f ... 1 1 1 1 1 .... Il .n' -t. t 1 1 1 .. 1 <•:.w f :. 1 1 1 1 1 .'.'K',4'...y_ f .. 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1. . A.ai I 1 ! •, .•,: I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I t .� .. I I 1 I 1 I t 1 I I 1 1 f I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 t , I 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 t f t 1 1 I 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 OTHER 1 FWT P EN D E D H C: M A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M _ O T H E R STATE PEN R E S D F C M P C: R UN UNION BONDS MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS �-, � �, ,, , A 61 6 93440 I 1 I I 1 1 � 1 Z I_ 4'�' -�i► I 1144 1 I t 1 1 , 1 1 I I DR =, I 14 %t55 u �' d00 '�� 11F.� a0 r-' 800 I, 116180 r .�00 FJ 70 b.a 1 1 I 1 I 6495 I 1 1 'lalatl0 1 I 7125 1 1 1 944140 FERALF DF C:MF . - r, �, �• ry � n rr 1 FUND NO. 6 DEPT. NO. 05 DIV. NO. 00 CITY OF M A P L E W i i O D CUTOFF DATE 1 1 2 0 $ 7 PAGE PAYROLL . CMANAI INITIAL d LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS / EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME P P E M O T H E k 1 FWT PEN Q E E1' G M A E B C ADJ. GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M - - 0 T H E R - Y ' T A T E f= E N F1' T D F C' M F r f'• - - C R U N r- UNION F O N D S MLA ADJ. NET GROSS NET N ADE AU E. 508 1014 13.350 4.100 ' 56070 ' ; 0v ; 10 30 ; .100 i 4t��15 ; ; 1 4 �_ F 71;75 4x9 1 L :a27 1.185 8�'II00 ' 7;25 ' ; ' A iii 114 0 > M O M O O I ! 1$8• 7'),68 I i i i ; ; 1;25 ; ' 666:8 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ; ; 3QOO 42430 ; I I 1 I PENAL DF dM P > WEEKS 2 ST OV ;> FLS 0 MULWEE, G. 5 100 69 477 ; ; ; ; ; ; 19 .132 41;92 266 104719 508 1590 13.090C 1000 13Q90 000 10472 i ; 6448 2 85, 7125 ; I 616 > S 0. S O 0 $00 10472 ; - 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PENAL DF dMP 1 1 I > WEEKS G S T O V > FLS O NUTESON, L. 700 12676 191175 1199 ; ; ; ; ; ; 1424;8 508 1720 17.580C 000 14064 i ; 74' 1 5 i 21 046 19'00 ' ; 9150 ; 614101 >.. _g 1 ..f 6 : ,.,..,,. 0 ; ..... �., _ 1' _. - .. ,.,.. 1' . 1' + 1' 1 �4 1 1 ; ; 11'00 DAYS 10 ANNUAL f , , , , , , PENAL DF dMP > WEEKS 2 ST V V I ~' FLS O I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I t I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 CiREHEI M, R. 5050 6605 1 1 14.94 I 42.44 1 311'66 { ! 1 1 1 ; 1 146110 6 508 2563 13.090 1 J50 174'72 000 10472 i ; ; ; 6';86 ; 42.85 74100 7.25 ; ; ; 1- I g 41 . 0 .,:... $400 10472 .....1 1'_ :. 1 1 �8 1 7' 60 1 1 1 100 1 1 _ ... 57214 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL PENAL DF dMP > WEEKS 2 ST OV • FLS EDSON, D. 7200 94 48 1' ; ; ; ; ; 174109 4J44 8:50 1061b 508 2582 13.090 000 10472 ; i ; ; 6444 ; 1 85 184;00 7125 ; 13'00 ; 47512 .M p.. - .s4..p....x... 0 t 1 1 1d8 1 1 7Fa26 I 1 ' 1100 �. t 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUA ; ; i ; i ; i ; i ; PENAL DF dMP > WEEKS 2 ST O 1 1 i ,�-yy FLS V OWEN, G. 4400 60540 ; ; i ; 18. I i I 2459 1 16;OT 1 ; l ; 1 ; 1 ; I ; 1 720100- 1 401:8 508 5993 13.850 1' ; 000 1148 1 1' ; 1' 9155 I 1 1 1 ' I . 5 , 7;t.x. 40 Z' 3 1 I I 27914 .O : ,:_.2s�00 8780 ; :..... , 2073 I I j DAYS 10 ANNUAL PEFOAL DF CaMP > WEEKS 2 ST 0t ! 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 �Vyy FL � S V 1 1 I � I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 ( ! 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 t I 1 ( 1 t I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 f 1 I 1 1 I 1 HOURS /EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS /EARN DOUBLE TIME P R E M 1 O T H ER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C: M A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS VACATION SICK HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M 0 T H E R .- STATE PEN F1' E S D r F C M P C R LI N UNI P DS MBA NET 33 Su 473 16 2 307162 ' 4dOO I 67 40 uU0 4(1fj!5 i I i 87 35J23 ti l) a T ; - 10 ;�.� :i C,1 : 8 6 I , 54 1100 1 , 3025 7 I 401': =3 1 I :2150 1 7.1 '00- ; 1 8 614414, 4400 F 1 I 1 1 _ 3221161 3000 42630 PERALF DF C:MP FUND NO. 70 DEPT. NO. 0 509 DIV. NO. 05980000 C ITY OF. MAPLEWI IOD PAYROLL JOURNAL . 1 CUTOFF DATE 11/20/87 PAGE 34 INITIAL & LAST NAME EMPLOYEE NO. RATE HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME PREM 10 T H Er R 1. FWT PEN D E H C: M A E 1 4 C ADJ GROSS GROSS NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS VACATION SICK PAY HOLIDAY COMP. OVERTIME MISCELLANEOUS P R E M 2 - �• O T H E R" S S T A T E FEN R S T E) T Nc D F C M r , C R UN UNION BONDS MBA ADJ NET NET MULVANEY, D. 4a00 57100 ; ; ' ' 118E 1 49 4447 31 '77 ' ' :- • 1161�Y 509 100th 14.350 3400 `� 459 20 000 11130 6� 1 -- 7 1 t , ; 344 71' 1 1 455,[ M 4 M 4 0 3C137 1 > DAYS 10 ANNUAL 1' PEF�AL DF AMP } WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 t 1 FLS 0 SPRE IGL, G. 7"00 76420 10 34;47 301'T7 $ 61'3 509 2123 10.600 ' I ' t 000 $ 48 0 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ! , 471'01 1 1 1 �s�5 I I 7;25 1 1 ; 1 ; I ; 2 567,02 > M O 1. " 0 0 1 1 1 1 I t 1 I sl a I , rj � 4 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I > DAYS 10 ANNUAL ' t ' t ' t ' t ' t ' 1 ' t , , ' 1 PEF�AL DF GMP 1 t 1 I 1 > WEEKS 2 ST OV 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 + > FLS 0 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 f • ::►�:, ...ca.... .�.�, ...: ii3t.:::., . _ ..�'f.. .. 1 I 1 ! 1 . � . ;:o . ' I 1 f I I 1 I .. i . + . ' 1` I 1 1 1 I 1 1 .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. .. 1 It t I 1 1 I ! 1 f .. 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 w I , . 1 1 1 1 1 1 t . « I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ... 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 t .. w 1 . 1 1 ( i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 , .,, Y - .. ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .a. � •.:.w,... I 1 t t 1 t :lQ:.#�J►•� .. t t 1 f 1 1 ,... s::. � �.,:.ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. 1 1 61�s... :�:.rc� ...:.;:�..•.::- .LU.'X.�.._ .l-- .i.,:. _..' ., ... �- '�,... ' I 1 ..4' .1 -...' ,.. .. .t 1 I 1 -., 1 s 1 I 1 . . ... 1 H ... ! 1 ,.... ' 1 1 ( 1 . . «. f 1 1 I ..... .. I I 1 1 ! . . ' I I t t 1 1 I 1 1 .. , 1 r 1 1 ( 1 1 1 I ...;ud s..• 1 ! 1 1 . ., .. I 1 1 1 .. •J• .. + :c1 :1'1'.'.. I 1 ,''i. ; C:S . ; 1 1 t I . .b..v .-.. -. .' .. .:..i: 1 1 1 1 ..l ... 1 .. I 1 I <.�:..�•.::�« :... ., .� .. .r;•,�i..•:r.jew :. ..... -.. I 1 I 1 r><..,,.. 1 ..�:. 1 I 1 I 1 1 .., 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t . + .. I I 1 { 1 1 1 .. I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ... ... I 1 I I I 1 ... ' { t 1 1 1 1 ' .. 1 I I 1 I 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ! I �. t I I f •. 1 1 I 1. 1 t 1 � 1 sa.t:.: 1 I .�i..b: I ...t►:':; 1 1 t 1 _.. .. t . 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I I I I 1 1 j 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 t I 1 I I t 1 1 1 1 1 I HOURS/EARN REGULAR HOURS/EARN FAMILY HOURS/EARN DOUBLE TIME PREM 1 OTHER 1 FWT PEN D E D H C M A E B C ADJ. GROSS ADJ NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME PREM? OTHERr STATE PEN RES DF CMP CR UN UNION BONDS MBA. NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS I - c 1 1 X00 13020 i i i i 1 �� i 2U��;5 C,la'14 61iF�4 i i � i i 202370 1 3 45. -t20 16100 195 60 i i i i 11 (17.2 i 1::J,8 5 3441'00 141'50 i i i 1052► 1 I - r;. t I 1 1 I 1 t I 1 PERALF DF CMP FUND NO. DEPT. NO. DIV. NO TOTAL CITY OF M A P L. E W O I I D PAYROLL JOURNAL CUTOFF DATE 11/20/ PAGE 35 1 7 � INITIAL & LAST NAME HOURS / EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 10THER FWT FEN DED H C: M A E L C ADJ. GROSS EMPLOYEE NO RATE REGULAR FAMILY DOUBLE TIME ADJ NET GROSS VACATION HOLIDAY OVERTIME P R E M 2 ri T E P A STATE FEN R S D F C M C R UN UNION BOND • M L-C A NET NO. DEPS. MARITAL STATUS SICK PAY COMP. MISCELLANEO r_. r � r ., • • •�,c.... r,.•.. =.:,sue ,.: . •: ,.,,:... ,.: a._::._ »_• 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 .. 1 I f I 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 ( 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I t 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 ( 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t I 1 1 I 1 ( 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 . .. 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I t 1 I 1 t 1 I I 1 1 i I I t 1 t 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! I I I I ( 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I t 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 f 1 f I 1 1 1 I I I I I I ! I 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 t I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 t 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I w :•�anw, e b: • ea, . •... +.-i .: .r.• iR• .. .•ra:.. a.L ai•ts.tr'li. a -..,_ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 'L'�d.rf ='... t ,.4 1 1 1 1 1 ... 1 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 ....:•>:A ry {. 1. ..t.:. I 1 I 1 .. 1 .. I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ._ _.. 1 .•.. 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. .L.n�'.... .w I 1 1 1 I .- 1 ... I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 •.X. •:. . I 1 1 1 1 .. I I t I I 1 ! I I I t . K.... .. 1 ( 1 I .. ( I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I .. I 1 1 t 1 .. f I 1 t 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 ... 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 t 1 ( I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I ( t I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I ( 1 1 I I I I I 1 ( 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f I I 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I 1 I ( I t ! I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I t 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I t 1 I 1 1 1 I f 1 1 I f 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I t 1 I 1 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 ( 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 ( I ! I I 1 1 1 t I I 1 :. �.;.-.. a1.+ �s�y.►:. X„ nsiz..�:..�ri�•�.�k.3..,ti�ttdw ..... I .:.17w..:.. i ...�. I I I t 1 1 , .: -..; .::,. -:� .,,• I 1 1 1 1 1 :s.: �:, .. t I I I 1 1 I . ,r�r,.. ,., 1' I 1 1 1 1 t ..a.:.. f .......... I I 1 t I I 1 ....,c.. .. 1" I I 1 I 1 1 ... 1 . 1 I I I I 1 I ,. -. 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 � .. t I 1 I I 1 I .. _ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I ., 1 t t I t I 1 1 ..... '• 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • .�.,.: ... wy.. ;.:...,raar,.►�::.:..:.ni : -:._ y- • ;.�i.�' . _.. t.... . ,. .. -.... :,:.., ,... .. •_ ! I I 1 1 .�a..d: r - 1 . , 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ! .. .. � .. 1 I 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 :.•.:a.. .n:+,• f - • 1 1 I 1 ( 1 1 1 t 1 1 I ( 1 1 t 1 I 1 I }! 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 .,.....� .... 1 I 1 1 I f 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I t I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... ,n..r.�_.♦ ... ,.. I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 ( 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 t 1 t .:.., � .,_ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I t 1 I 1 t I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 .. i.:.,.. 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 t .. .. f I I 1 I 1 I t 1 I t 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 t I I I 1 I I I I i I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 . _ . _ 1 I 1 I t 1 ( ! I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 t I t 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I ( 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 f 1 t I t 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 t t 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 I f 1 I 1 f ( I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 t 1 1 I I 1 1 f I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 ! I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I . . t 1 I I I 1 I ! I 1 1 • I t f I I t f 1 ( 1 I I I I ! t 1 { 1 1 1 1 ( I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I t I I I I 1 ! I 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( HOURS /EARN HOURS /EARN HOURS/EARN P R E M 1 OTHER FWT FEN D E D H C: M A E E -. C ADJ. GROSS ADJ. NET GROSS REGULAR VACATION FAMILY HOLIDAY DOUBLE TIME OVERTIME PPEM _ OTHER STATE PEN PrS DF C:MP CF UN UNION BONDS MBA NET SICK COMP. MISCELLANEOUS - jj � C - r W A -. - CA B R A 14 F,>,5' 00 90417+47 i i i i 3�4 :�jFj 15L,:tiliSG 7���'� 4 :�1a1 :_�50 7�c��00— 109471:85 5�J`�44 $C. � i7 911;50 i2�1jL:if 14�� 5 20 51 i 171ji:�ili 77CIi; � ; F�r�a -,`� U: _40o 4 �+'='S o�� ;'�5 11i'70 7 7834 5 r1 r 2 . J 0. . -I (- r. iJ F . _ I 1 1 2 + I _ I 2950 45� 38 3400 41410 PERALF DF C:MP 8500 1 139 2 F;r:a500 52:x=:729 1 r A' MEMORANDUM., TO: City Manager b ra e� y er 9 FROM: Finance Director RE: Approval of Plan Document for Self- Insurance Dental Plan DATE: November 23, 1987 The attached master plan document has been prepared by the administrator of our self - insurance dental plan. The purpose of this document is to formalize the policies and procedures that they have used for the past several years so that there is a document available for reference. The benefits outlined in the plan are those presently in effect. It is recommended that the Council app,.rove this document and authorize the appropriate City officials to sign it on page 21, DFF:lnb • r MASTER PLAN DOCUM= OF DENTAL BENEFITS FOR THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Effective October 1, 1986 i TABLE OF CONTENTS � Page ARTICLE - DEFINITIONS ... ............................... 1 _ ARTICLE II - GENERAL PROVISIONS ........................... 3 ARTICLE III - SCHEDULE OF BENEFITS ........:.. .............. 9 -. ARTICLE IV - BENEFIT PROVISIONS ........................... 10 ARTICLE V - C LAIM PROVISIONS......... 13 ARTICLE VI - COORDINATION OF BEI�F'ITS ..................... 14 ARTICLE VII - SUBROGATION ... ............................... 17 ARTICLE - RIGHTS OF RECOVERY ........................... 18 ARTICLE Ix - Fv� �zr�c ....... ............................. 19 ARTICLE X - AMENDY= AND TE IINATION .................... 20 ARTICLE XI - MIS OUS . ............................... 21 EMPLOYER: The City of Maplewood providing employment to the Covered Employee, EXPENSES IN CURRED: An expense will be considered to be incurred at the time the service or the supply to which it relates is provided: Any treatment, procedure, facility, equipment, drugs, drug usage or supplies not yet recognized by the Plan and any of such items requiring Federal or other governmental agency approval not granted at the time services were rendered. MEDICAL NECESSITY Medical necessity means that the service a patient receives is required to identify or treat an Illness or Injury which a Dentist has diagnosed or reasonably suspects. To be MEDICALLY NECESSARY the services must: 1.0 be consistent with the diagnosis and treatment of the patient's condition; 2. be in accordance with standards of good dental practice; 3, not be solely for the convenience of the patient, Dentist or supplier;. and 4. be performed in the least costly setting required by the patient's dental condition. Just the service is prescribed by a Dentist does not mean the service is YMICALLY NECESSARY. In an effort to make treatment convenient, to follow the wishes of the patient or the patient's family, to investigate the use of unproven treatment methods, or to comply with local Hospital practices, a Dentist may suggest or permit a method of providing care that is not Medically Necessary, MONTH: Means one (1) Calendar Month, NAMED FIDUCIARY The person who has the operation and administration of the Plan. the City. authority to control and manage the The Named Fiduciary for the Plan is REASONABLE AND CUSTCMARY CHARGES The most frequent charges which an individual Dentist charges to the majority of his patients for a given procedure. These charges must be within the range of fees charged by most Dentists of similar training and experience in a given geographical area for this same procedure, with consideration given to unusual circumstances involving dental complications requiring additional time, skill, and experience. a 2 PD139 ARTICLE II GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Eligibility The following persons shall be eligible to be covered under the Plan: Employees All active, full -time employees will be eligible for coverage in accordance with the rules established by the Employer, An employee who applies for individual coverage beyond thirty -one (31) days from, the date he becomes. eligible must suhmi.t, at his own expense satisfactory Evidence of Good Health to the Claims Supervisor's office. Dependents The following dependents of a covered employee will be eligible for coverage: 1. the employee's spouse or an eligible former spouse as defined by Minnesota law; 2, the employee's unmarried natural, adopted child, or step -child under age 19, residing in the employee's home and dependent on the employee for majority support and maintenance; 3, the employee's unmarried dependent child age 19 to age 25 who is a full -time student enrolled in -and attending a recognized course of study or training in a public or private secondary school, college, university, or licensed trade school. For the purpose of the plan, full -time student status continues during: (a) regularly scheduled school vacation periods; or (b) absence from classes in which enrolled for up to four months due to physical or mental disability (this does NOT include termination of student status for personal reasons),, If both a husband and wife are eligible employees, they may both be covered as a dependent of the other and any eligible expenses will be considered as described In the Coordination of Benefits provision of this Plan. Any eligible dependent children may be covered as a dependent of. one or both parents (if covered under both, eligible expenses will also be considered as described in the Coordination of Benefit provision) B. Effective Date of Employee Coverage Coverage with this Plan will become effective on the employee's eligiblity date, provided application for enrollment is made, the employee is actively at work. 3 PD139 If the employee is not actively at work, the effective date for the family will be deferred until he or she returns to active, full -time work, Co Effective Date of Dependent Coverage Coverage will become effective for an Eligible Dependent as indicated below, provided the Eligible Dependent is not Hospital confined on that - date; otherwise, his effective date will be deferred until he or she receives final medical discharge from such confinement. An Eligible Dependent's coverage date will be determined as follows: 1. The date on which the Eligible Employee becurnes covered if he has one or more Eligible Dependents on that date, 2, If the Eligible Employee is without a dependent on the date he becomes covered, he shall become covered for dependent coverage on the date he acquires an Eligible Dependent., 3e Each Eligible Dependent will be covered on the above effective date provided the covered employee has made application for dependent coverage and has made the required contribution, D, Effective Date of Coverage for Newborn Children A child born to a Covered Employee or a Covered Dependent spouse will automatically become covered as a Dependent. The effective date of coverage for the child will be the date of birth. Coverage will be to the same extent as is provided for other covered dependent children, E. Effective Date of Change in Amount of Coverage Any change in the amount of coverage of a Covered Person by reason of a change in classification, change in benefit structure and /or schedule, or for any other reason, will become effective on the first of the month following the change provided the Covered Person is in Active Service on that date, otherwise the effective date of the change will be deferred until his return to Active Service, F. Termination of Employee Coverage I Coverage under this Plan will terminate on the earliest of the following dates: 1. The date of termination of the Master Plan Docunent; 2. With respect to any specific benefit provision, the date the contract is amended to change or exclude that provision, or at the time the maximum benefit has been paid; 3. Upon failure to make a required contribution; 4e When the employee's employment terminates. 4 PD139 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN City of Maplewood. (the "City ") hereby establishes the Employee welfare Benefit Plan ( "Plan ") effective, It is the City's intent to maintain such plan pursuant to this document. The purpose of this Plan is to promote the health and welfare of all Covered Persons through dental benefits. The Plan is hereby established under the following terms and conditions: ARTICLE I Tl + TNTrPTnNTC The terms' set out below, wherever used in this Plan shall be construed as follows: BENEFIT YEAR One (1) Calendar Year, ,CALENDAR YEAR The period of January 1 through December 31 inclusive. 2OVEPED DEPENDENT Any Eligible Dependent whose coverage became effective and has not terminated. EMPLOYEE Any Eligible Employee whose coverage became effective and has not terminated. COVERED PERSON Any Eligible Employee or Eligible Dependent whose coverage became effective and has not terminated. DATE OF ISSUE The date this Plan took effect. DENTIST: A legally qualified Dentist practicing within the authority of his license, and a legally qualified Physician authorized by his license to perform the particular dental service he has rendered. DENTAL HYGIENIST: A person who is currently licensed to practice dental hygiene by the governmental authority having jurisdiction over the licensing and practice of dental hygiene and who works under the supervision and direction of a Dentist. ELIGIBLE DEPENDENT The lawful spouse or an eligible forneer spouse as defined by Minnesota Law of the Eligible Employee and an Eligible Employee's unmarried child fram the child' s date of birth to age 19, or to age 25 if the child is financially dependent on the employee for support, and is enrolled as a full -time student in an educational institution. ELIGIBLE EMPLO The term "Eligible Employee" means a full -time employee of the Employer who is in Acitve Service on the effective date of the Plan; excluding in any case part -time employees, temporary employees, and employees who work less than 20 hours per week. 1 PD139 G. Termination of Dependent Coverage 1. on the date the coverage of the Covered Employee is terminated or extended under the Continuation of Coverage provision; 2. If the Covered.. Employee ceases to make the required contribution for the Covered Dependent, coverage will terminate at the end of the period for which contributions are made; 39 on the date the dependent no longer meets the Plan's definition of an Eligible Dependent; 4. On the termination date of the Plan. A disabled child age 19 or older may remain a dependent so long as the child is physically handicapped or mentally retarded and disabled as a result, and financially dependent on the employee. The disabled person's disability must have come into existence prior to age 19 (or age 25 in the case of a full -time student) AND the employee's coverage must have been continuous since the disabled dependent's 19th birthday (or 25th, for full -time student). Proof of continued disability ma y required periodically. y � H. Continuation of Coverage All covered members of the Plan are entitled to elect to remain in the Plan at their own expense, after coverage would otherwise terminate as follows: 16 QUALIFIED PERSONS: The following persons qualify for continuation: a) An employee (and their covered dependents), whose coverage would otherwise end due to (1) termination of emplolu ent for a reason other than gross misconduct; or (2) a reduction in the employee's work hours; and b) an employee whose coverage would otherwise end due to termination of employment because of total disability as defined by State law (MSA 62A.147); and c) an employee's former spouse ( and any children) , whose coverage would otherwise end due to divorce or legal separation; and d) an employee's surviving spouse and /or children, whose coverage would otherwise end due to the employee's. death; and e) an e loyee's spouse and /or children, whose coverage would otherwise end due to the employee' election to drop out of the dental plan upon the employee's entitlement to Medicare; and f) an employee's child, whose coverage would otherwise end due to ceasing to be a dependent child under the generally applicable requirements of the plan. 5 PD139 EX(_77EPTION: Continuation is not available to any employee or dependent who is eligible for Medicare or who is covered under another group dental plan. 2. REQUIRED MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION: A person who elects continuation will be required to pay the entire cost of the continued coverage. A 2% surcharge will be added to each monthly contribution to help defray the administration expenses. 3. CON'T`INUATION PERIOD: Continued coverage will end after coverage has been continued for 36 months with the following exceptions: a) for qualified persons described in 1. (a) above (pertainirLg to termination of employment or reduction in work hours), the date coverage has been continued for 18 months; or b) for qualified persons described in 1. (b) above (pertaining to termination of employment or reduction in work hours), the date coverage has been continued for 18 months. However, under state law (MSA 62A.147),, coverage can be continued beyond 18 months for the period the total disability continues, c) for qualified persons described in 1. (c) above (pertaining to termination of dependent coverage due to divorce or legal separation), the date coverage has been continued for 36 months. However, under state law (MSA 62A.21) if the divorce decree requires the plan member to provide continued coverage, the coverage may be continued until the earlier of the following dates: (1) the date the insured former spouse becomes covered under another group dental plan, or (2) the date coverage would otherwise terminate under the plan. d) for qualified persons described in 1. (d) above (pertaining to surviving spouse and /or children) the date coverage has been continued for 36 months. However, under state law (MSA 6 2A.14 6) , coverage may be continued beyond 36 months until the earlier of the following dates: (1) the date the surviving spouse becomes covered under another group dental plan, or (2) the date coverage would have terminated under the plan had the plan member lived, e) with respect to each qualified person, the date that a person becomes covered under another group dental plan as a result of employment, re- employment or remarriage; or f) with respect to each qualified person, the date that person becomes entitled to Medicare; or 6 PD139 g) the end of the contribution period for which the required contribution is made, if the required contribution is not paid on a timely basis or h) the date the Employer's health plan is terminated for all • employees. 4. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS: If a dependent qualifies for continuation due to divorce, legal separation or ceasing to be a dependent child, either the employee or the dependent rust so notify the employer (Plan) . This notice should be given before the qualifying event, or as soon as possible thereafter (but not more than 60 days after the qualifying event) . The employer must give qualified persons written notice of their continuation rights, obligations and contribution costs within 14 days after receipt of the notice described above, or within 14 days after any other qualifying event (termination of employment, death of the employee, etc.) becomes known to the employer. 5. KLECT REQUIREMENTS: The qualified person must make written election within 60 days after the later of (1) the date coverage would otherwise end, or (2) the date of the employer's written notice. The election form must be returned to the employer within the stated 60 -day periods otherwise, the continuation option expires. The initial contribution must be included with the election form. However, if election is made more than one month after the date coverage would otherwise end,. an arrangement may be made to delay (for up to 45 days) payment of that part of the initial contribution that applies to the contribution period PRECEDING the election. I. Termination of a Coverage or the Plan This Plan shall continue in effect. until terminated by the City pursuant to the terms of this section. The City may terminate any coverage in force under this Plan at any time, without the consent of any person, by written notice. J.' Miscellaneous Except for assignments of reimbursements payable for coverage for Hospital, surgical, dental or medical charges, no assignment of this Plan shall be of any force, I 7 PD139 To the full extent permitted by law, all rights • l g and benefits occurring under this Plan shal • be exempt from execution, attachment, garnishment, other legal or equitable g , or process, for the debts or liabilities of an employee. bil Y Section titles are for convenience of reference only, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Plan. This Plan is not in lieu of and does not a • e by Worker's ffect any requirement for covera g e s �nsation insurance. Any provision of this Plan which is in ' conflict with the law. of the state or other jurisdiction which governs this Plan shall • be deemed amended to conform with the min imam requirements of the law. No failure to enforce any provision of this Plan shall affect the right thereafter to enforce such provision nor shall all such failure affect its any other provision right to enforce n of this.Plan, If the Schedule of Benefits provides separate ' ndents p benef anwunts for employees and de Pe ., then the amr�unt reimbursable under the Plan shall hall be the amount applicable to the ual undergoing the treatment. 8 PD139 ARTICLE III DEN'I'AL BENEFIT SUMMARY DEDUCTIBLE . CUSS I SERVICES - Preventive and Diagnostic Care CLASS II SERVICES - Restorative Care CLASS III SERVICES - Prosthetics CLASS IV SERVICES - Orthodontics YJAXIMLJM BENF.,FITS Class I per calendar year Class II per calendar year Class III per calendar year Class IV lifetime maximtun NONE Paid at 100% Paid at 800 Paid at 50% Paid at 500 $500 $500 $500 $500 PD139 ARTICLE IV DESCRIPTION OF DENTAL CARE BENEFITS If you incur eligible nses for sere' dentin exile ices recommended and performed a _ t or licensed dental hygienist working � Yg g under the supervision of a dentist, for dental care and treatment, benefits will be payable for eligible shown in the Benefit S All minimum g e expenses as • time intervals will be strictly enforced unless, in EBP ' s j ud nt dental heal � , a special need i spawn for maintenance for th, ELIGIBLE EXPENSES The reasonable and customary fees for the following awing services and supplies will be considered eligible when they are necessarily a dui licensed lY sncurred upon recommendation of Y dentist. A dental service or supply will be considered in curred on the date a service is actually rendered or trea tment is received, except: (a) with respect to fixed bridgework, crowns, g . � n s, inlays, Inlays, or gold restorations, the services will be considered incurred on e • re the day of tooth preparation; (b) with respect to partial or full dentures • the services will be con- sidered incurred on the date the ression was s taken; (c) with respect to endodontics, the service • swill be considered incurred on the date the tooth was opened for root canal therapy, CLASS I - PREVENTIVE AND DIAGNOSTIC CARE 10 Routine examinations once eve 6 months, ths. 2 Prophylaxis once every 6 months. 3. Topical fluoride and sea • sealant applications once every 12 months for dependents under age 15). 4. Oral hygiene instruction as required each 6 but not more frequently than once mdonths , 5. Bite wing x -rays every 12 months. 60 Full mouth or panorex x -ra s eve 3 Y every years, 7 • Enmergency treatment for relief of ain p • CLASS II - RESTORATIVE SERVICES 1• Regular restorative services (other • than gold fillings),, 2. Oral surgery, 30 Endodontics (including root canal and pulpal therapy), 10 PD139 4. Periodontics(diseases of the gums and mouth tissues). 5. Extractions, 6. Space maintainers. CLASS III - PROSTHETICS 16 Inlays, onlays, gold - fillings and crowns. 2. Complete and partial dentures. 3. Fixed bridgework. CLASS IV - ORTHODONTIA (for eligible dependents under age 19) Treatment necessary for the prevention and correction of malocclusion of teeth and associated facial disharmonies to the maxinmun shown in the Benefit Sunuary. DENTAL LIMITATIONS Dental benefits are not provided for: 10 Dental services which are perfon ed primarily for cosmetic purposes.. 2. Hospitalization for any purpose, 3. Anesthesia required for dental services unless it is administered by a dentist. 4. All orthodontic services in excess of the benefit specified. 5. Orthognathic surgery (surgery to reposition the jaws) not s cif' Po specifically provided for under the Plan, 69 Investigative experimental procedures, or dental services not other- wise clinically accepted. 7• Procedures, appliances, or restorations that are necessary o alter,, ter, restore or maintain occlusion, including but not limited to: increas- ing vertical dimension, replacing or stabilizing tooth structure lost by attrition, realigning of teeth, periodontal splinting and th- ologic recordings, mandibular orthopedic appliances, and bite p lanes. 80 The repl acrnent of any prosthetic or orthodontic ap P l i ance which is misplaced, lost, or stolen. 9. Charges for programs of treatment, including prosthetics, which g p , began . prior to a plan member's effective date. 10. Items intended for sport or home use, such as toothpaste,, mouthwash Water -Pik, mouthguards, etc. 11 PD139 11. Any charge in excess of the least costly lternate service e which produces a professionally satisfactory result. 12. Dental services, dental supplies, and dental devices not r exp essly covered as a benefit under the Plan. - INTEGRATION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL BENEFITS If a plan n m ber should incur charges for a dental rocedure considered an eligible pro- P which would be g tense under both the medical and dental expense visions of the eli Employer- sponsored lan, those char es w' • P g ill be considered first as a medical expense, with the remaining (reasonable and customary) under the balance considered u Dental Care Benefit. However, the combined medical and dental benefit payments cannot exceed the actual expense incurred 12 PD139 ARTICLE V TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING CLAIMS All claims must be submitted within five (5) months of the date _ charges are incurred to be considered eligible for g payment. A charge will be deemed incurred on the date .services or supplies are actually rendered or received, Failure to submit such claims within five (5) months shall not ' �.nvalldate or reduce any claim if it was not reasonably possible to submit thEm within the five (5) month period, In no case will a claim older than 24 months be considered eligible for payment. 13 PD139 ARTICLE VI COORDINATION OF BITS Application If any Covered Person covered under this Plan, which includes this Plan and any other group Medical or Dental Care Expense Benefits provided through or by the Employer, is also covered under one or more other Plans, the benefits payable with respect to him under this Plan will be coordinated with benefits able with �y respect to him under all other Plans. Coordination will apply in deternlining the benefits payable with respect to a Covered Person for an y Claim Determination Period if, for the Allowable Expenses incurred during that period, the sum, of : 1. The benefits that would be payable under this Plan in the absence of coordination; and 2. The benefits that would be payable under all other Plans in the absence of provisions for coordination in this Plan, would exceed. those Allowable Expenses. Except as provided in the following paragraph, when Coordination of Benefits applies to the benefits payable with respect to a Covered Person for a Claim Determination Period, the benefits that would be payable for Allowable Expenses incurred during that period under this Plan, in the absence of Coordination of Benefits, will be reduced to the extent necessary so the sum of those reduced benefits and all the benefits payable for those Allowable Expenses under all other Plans, including the benefits that would have been payable had a claim been properly made for them, will not exceed the total of such Allowable expenses. If, in coordinating the benefits of this Plan with those of another Plan, the rules set forth In the following Order of Benefit Determination paragraph would require this Plan to be the primary payor and the other Plan, according to its rules, is the secondary payor, then the benefits of that other Plan will be ignored for the purpose of determining the benefits of this Plan, If, in coordinating the benefits of this Plan with those of another Plan, the rules set forth in the following Order of Benefit Determination paragraph would require this Plan to be the secondary payor, and the other Plan the r' p �mary payor, the benefits of this Plan will be reduced so that they and the benefits payable under the other Plan (s) do not total more than those Allowable Expenses, In the event a Health Maintenance Organization (HVj0) would be the primary carrier for a . claim submitted under this Plan, Allowable Expenses will not include any expense for otherwise covered services or supplies which are covered by an HMO, or would have been covered by the HMO had the Covered Person availed themselves of the services of an HMO Participating Provider. Order of Benefit Determination The rules establishing the order of benefit determination are: 1. The benefits of a Plan which covers the Covered Person for when claim is made other than as a dependent will be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers that Covered Person as a dependent; 14 PD139 2. The benefits of a Plan which covers the Covered Person for whcxn claim is made as a dependent of a male will be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers that Covered Person as a dependent of a female; or (a) when the parents are separated or divorced and the parent with custody Y of the child has not remarried, the benefits of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent with custody f the child will be determined ore the benefits of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent without custody. (b) When the parents are divorced and the parent with the custody f the child has remarried the benefit • is of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent with custody shall be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers that child as a dependent of the step - parent, and the benefits of a Plan which covers that child as a dependent of the step- parent will be determined before the benefits of a Plan which covers that child as a dependent of the parent without custody. (c) Notwithstanding (a) and (b) above, if there is a court decree which would otherwise establish financial responsibility for the medical, dental or other health care expenses with respect to the child, the benefits of a Plan which covers the child as a dependent of the parent with such financial responsibility shall be determined before the benefits of any other Plan which covers the child as a dependent child; 3. when rules (1) and (2) do not establish an Order of Benefit Determination the benefits of the Plan which has covered the Covered Person for whom claim is made for the longer period of time will be determined before the benefits of the Plan which has covered the Covered Person the shorter period of time. 4. Benefits of a Plan which does not contain a Coordination of Benefi Provision will be determined before the benefits of this Plan. When Coordination of Benefits operates to reduce the total amount of benefits otherwise payable during any Claim Determination Period with resp to a Covered Person covered under this P � Pl an, each benefit that would be payable in the absence of Coordination of Benefits will be reduced ro rtionatel and the reduced amount will be p � y ' charged against any applicable benefit limit of this Plan. Release of Information For the purposes of determining the applicability f, and lementin Y �p g the terms Of the above provisions of this Plan or any similar rovision of another p lan lan, the Claims Supervisor may, without the consent of or notice of an Covered overed Person, release to or obtain frcam any other insurance c an organization or individuals Y or other is any information, concerning any Covered Person, which the Claims Supervisor considers to be necessary r those �'Y purposes. Any Covered Person receiving benefits under this Plan will furnish to the ' Claims Supervisor the information that may be necessary o lenient th Provisions. �Y � e above 15 PD139 P a�,inent to other Carriers IN payments which should have been made under this Plan in accordance with the above provisions have been made under any other Plans, this Plan will have the right, exercisable alone and in its sole discretion to pay to any organization making those payments any amounts it determines to be warranted in order to satisfy the intent of the above provisions,. and amounts paid in this manner will be considered to be benefits paid under this Plan and, to the extent of these payments, this Plan will be fully discharged - from liability. Reco very i Whenever payments have been made by the Plan, at any time, for Allowable Expenses in a total amount in excess of the maximum amount of pant necessary at that time to satisfy the. intent of the above provisions, the Claims Supervisor will have the right to recover these payments, to the extent of the excess, from among one or more of the following, as the Plan Supervisor will determine: Any individuals to or for or with respect to whom these payments were made, any insurance companies or other organizations. Definitions "Plan ": Means Any of the following types of coverage providing medical or dental benefits or services: (1) group, blanket or franchise insurance coverage; [(2) any group hospital service prepayment, group medical service prepayment, group practice or other group prepayment coverage;] (3) group coverage under labor - management trusteed plans, union welfare plans, employer organization plans or employee benefit plans; (4) overage under governmental programs or coverage required or provided by any statute, except Medicare and State Mandated Automobile coverage. Refer to the Effect of Medicare and Effect of State Mandated Auta obi.le Insurance provisions for treatment of these coverages under this Plan. The Plan will be construed separately with respect to each contract or other arrangement for benefits or services; separately with respect to that portion of a contract or other arrangement which reserves the right to take the benefits or services of other Plans into consideration in determining its benefits, and separately with respect to that portion which does not reserve that right. "Allowable Expense ": Means any Reasonable and Customary item of expense at least a portion of which is covered under at least one of the Plans covering the Covered Person for whom claim is made, When a Plan provides benefits in the form of services rather than cash payments, the reasonable cash value of each service rendered will be considered to be both a Allowable Expense and a benefit paid. "Claim Det ermination Period ": Means a Calendar or Plan Year or that portion of a Calendar or Plan Year during which the Covered Person for wham claim is made has been covered under this Plan. 16 PD139 ARTICLE VII SUBROG In the event any benefits are paid to an Employee under this Plan the Plan to the extent permitted by law,. shall be subrogated and. succeed to the 1 ' Emp ogee s right of recovery for medical or dental expenses incurred against ' par and the Employee - g any third • Y Emp y e shall pay over to the Company all sums recovered, b suit, settlement or otherwise on account of such Y , ch medical or dental expenses incurred, but not to exceed the amount of benefits paid under this Plan. As a condition to paying any benefits under this Plan th t e Company may require the Employee o assign to it any such recovery or right thereto from an third art e extent that benefits its are payable le and Y party to the p Y under this Plan. For purposes of this provision, a recovery which does not specify the matters covered there by shall be deemed to include a recovery for medical or dental expenses incurred to the extent of any actual loss due to the disability involved. The 1 take such action furnish oY ee shall h such information and assistance, and execute such assignments and other instruments as the Company may require to facilitate � � litate enforcement of their rights and interests hereunder. The Employee shall take no action prejudicing � Y 11 also p �udicing such rights and interests. 17 PD139 ARTICLE VIII RIGHTS OF RECOVERY In the event of any over payment of benefits - b this p y s Plan, the Plar� will have the right to recover the overpayment. If an Employee is reater aid a benefit P g than allowed in accordance with the provisions of the Plan, the oy 1 ee will be � requested to refund the overpayment. If the refund is not received from the employee, the amount of the overpayment will be deducted fran future benefits S imi lar ly , if payment is made on the Employee's behalf to a Hospital, Physician, . p ysician, Dentist, or other provider of health or dental care, and that nt is found to be an overpayment., the Plan will �� �y ll request a refund of the overpayment from the provider, 18 PD139 ARTICLE IX FUNDING The procedure and method for funding the Plan is for the Plan Sponsor (the City) to pay benefits, administrative fees and any stop -loss insurance prep - d uns from the Trust established by the Plan Sponsor, and to which contributions shall be made by the Plan Sponsor. The eoplcyee may be required to contribute to the cost of the Plan for individual and /or family coverage through payroll deduction. 19 PD139 a w t , ' AMEND= AND TERMINATION Amendment and Termination The Plan shall be subject to amendment at any time hereafter by the Claims Administrator with the approval of the City in the event the Claims Administrator and City are not one in the same. The Plan may be terminated at any time hereafter by action. of the City Council, which action shall be caurunicated in writing to the Claims Administrator in the event the Claims Administrator and City are not one in the same. The amendment, termination, or discontinuance of this Plan shall not adversely affect any right of any Covered Person to benefits under the provisions of the Plan arising prior to such amendment or termination. 20 PD139 J i :l CILE XI ARTI MISCEII ANEOUS Indemnification The City shall indemnify any Employee to whom it has delegated fiduciary duties against any and all claims, losses, damages, expenses, and liabilities arising from responsibilities in connection with the Plan, unless the same is determined to be due to gross negligence or willful misconduct.' Riqht to Terminate no _Iloyment The establishment and maintenance of the Plan shall not confer upon any Employee the right to continue in the employ of the City, and the City expressly reserve the right to terminate the employment of any Employee, whether or not a Covered Person, whenever the interest of the City in this sole judgrrient., may so require. Law Governing Construction All questions pertaining to the interpretation, administration, validity, and effect of the provisions of the Plan shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota 'except for such laws as pertain to the. doctrine of the conflict of laws) to the extent they are not preempted by federal law. Headin s Not a Part Hereof Any headings preceding the texts of the several Articles and Sections hereof are inserted solely for convenience of reference and shai 1 not affect the meaning, construction,.or effect of such texts. Agent for Service of Legal Process The Plan Administrator shall be the agent for service of legal process. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council has caused this Plan Document to be executed by a duly authorized Officer of the City. ATTEST: BY: TITLE: BY: TITLE: 21 PD139 Agenda Number Action by Counc*110 E ndorsed Modified eJ ected:�, Agenda Report TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Budget Transfer - Finance Department and City Manager's Office DATE: December 4, 1987 The 1987 Budget for our shared secretary anticipated that she would spend approximately 50% of her time working for each of us. However, to date the split has been 31% for you and 69% for me. Consequently, adjustments are needed in the budgets for our respective departments. (It should be noted that the last few months have been closer to a 50/50 split.) Therefore, it is recommended that the Council approve.a transfer of $4,700 from the City Manager's Department budget to the Finance Department budget for the revised allocation of the secretary's time. Agenda Number Action by Cou oijBy Modlo d—_ e j e Gt e d ,.,, Agenda Report Da. TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Elimination of Special Assessment Fund and Budgeting for Public Improvement Projects DATE: December 4, 1987 The special assessment fund type has been eliminated due to a change in generally accepted accounting principles. Consequently, when the 1988 Budget document was prepared, a new capitol project fund was included titled Public Improvements Projects Fund. The purpose of this fund is to account for public improvement projects, previously accounted for 'in the Special Assessment Fund, that are wholly or partially financed by Special Assessments. Attached is additional background information regarding this change. It is now necessary to establish policies and procedures for budgeting related to the Public Emprovements Projects (P.I.P.) Fund. Since the feasibility report for each project contains a financing plan, it would be appropriate to use the plan as an initial budget for the project and establish the budget at the time the project is ordered. Since many projects extend over multi -year periods, the unspent portion of each project's budget should automatically be carried over to the next year in order to complete the project. Attached is a proposed resolution which would establish these policies and procedures. It is recommended that the Council adopt this resolution. cc: Public Works Director 0" Resolution WHEREAS p the Special Assessment Fund type has been eliminated due to a change in generally accepted accounting principles,.and ti n and budgeting WHEREAS, accounting rocedures need to be modified to p conform with the change in generally accepted principles. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Special Assessment Fund Debt Service Accounts be eliminated and reclassified as Debt Service Funds. 2. That the Special Assessment Fund Construction Accounts that are developer projects be reclassified and included in the Developer Projects Agency Fund. 3. That the Special Assessment Fund Construction Accounts that are p ubl i c improvement projects be reclassified and included in the Public Improvements Projects Fund in the Capital Projects Fund type. 4. That the Finance Director shall establish a budget for each public improvement project when the Council orders the project. 5. That the budget for each project i n i t i a l l y be recorded at amounts specified in the feasibility study for the project. 6. That the unspent portion of each budget should automatically be carried over to the next year at year end for incomplete projects. 7. That a 1987 budget is hereby established for each public improvement project in progress during 1987 at amounts equal to the original financing plan less previous year expenditures. 8. That change orders approved by the Council shall cause automatic budget changes in the same amounts. TO: City Manager Public Works Director FROM: Finance Director RE: E l i m i n a t i o n Of Special Assessment Fund DATE:. July 17 1587 INTRODUCTION In January, 1587 the Governmental Accounting St andar Bc,ar r,e 1 eased Statement E, Accounting and F i n a n c i a l Report i ng fo Special As sessment s. This Statement establishes accounting and f i n a n c i a l r �r i ng standar-ds fo r capital i mpt- ovement s and ser %vices financed by special assessments. The special assessment fund type is e l i m i n a t e d for ter financial r port i n g p ur poses effective in 1587. This has a significant impact on the City of Maplewo id's method of acc� � unt i n g for p u b l i c i m prl _)v ement pr j ect s and bonds issued to finance t hese pr -o j ect s. The Special Assessment Fund coast r - %uct i on projects we have rilust now be accounted for- as Capital Pr o j ect Funds. In a d d i t i o n , the Special Assessment Fund debt service acco writ s we have must be accounted for as Debt Ser i ce Funds. We do not have any alter-natives to this beca►_tse state law req u i r that we follow genera 1 1 y accept ed accounting p r i n c i p l e s (GAAP) . This ch ar,ge in GAAP req u i r that an immediate dec i s i on be mi rz g ar i n g our 1988 Budget. Since we pr pane budgets for% all other Capital Plr-o j ect Funds, should we pr -e par a 1988 Budget f or" our" new Capital Plr- o j ect Funds that w er e prev i � us 1 y Special Assessment Fund c� �nst r%uct i c =in pr =1.j ect s? ALTERNATIVES 1. Prepare a 1988 Budget fo all C 1 Plt-o j ect Funds except those •se t hat were previous 1 y Special Assessment Fund coast r-uct i on projects. Discontinue pr�epar i ng a budget for any Capital Pr-o j ect F Und s. 3. Pr-epare a 1988 Budget for all Capita 1 Pr -o j ect Funds i n c l u d i n g those use t hat were prev i Ous 1 y Special Assessment Fund coast r-uct i on projects. 4. Pr-epare a 1988 Budget for- all Capita 1 Pr-o j ect F Ur,d s i nc 1 ud i n g those that were prev i o us 1 y Special Assessment Fund coast r -uct i n n pr-o j ect s with the exception of deve 1 oper pr ect s which would be c l a s s i f i e d as Agency Funds. DISCUSSION The first a 1 t errr,at i ve would be easy t do for bud get i rig. However, it may be d i f f i Cult for people to and e rst and wh the Cit budgets for some but not all Capita 1 Pr%o j ect Funds. A greater prob 1 em would be the impact of this on the city' anneal financial report. In the report is Exhibit A -3 that is a Combined Statement of Revenues, E x pend i t ur and Changes in Fund Balance-Budget and Act ua 1- Genera 1, Special Revenue arid-Capital Pv %o j ect Fund Types. It would not be p o s s i b l e to prepar-e a statement l i k e Exhibit A--3 that did not include all Capita 1 Pr o j ect Funds because the a mount s in the actual co 1 umn must be for- all Capita 1 Project Funds. Thus, if a budget was pr-epared for only some funds, the budget versus actual compar i son would be f 1 awed. The second a 1 t er i ve would be the easiest to do for budgeting. Also, GAAP does 'not require budgets for Capital ProjeotFunds. f financial Th1s alternative would also be easy to implement or reporting.. However, the major disadvantages are that the Council may not accept it and it would decrease the level of financial management and' control over Capital Project Funds. Without a budget what would limit the amount of expenditures? What financial planning would be done if a budget wasn't prepared? The only.possibls* way this Could work is if the city had a formal five-year Capital Improvement Plan. Alternative three Would be the most difficult to do for budgeting. Each time the Council orders a feasibility report or project, they would have to adopt a budget. Large change orders probably also would require a budget changes Unspent budgeted amounts would have to be carried over to the nsmt year. (This is done automatically for Park Development Fund projects.) Budgets for developer projects would require a lot of guessing. The primary advantages of budgeting for improvement projects are consistency with present accounting and budgeting procedures for Capital Project Funds, would provide useful information on the status of projects, would help to highlight miscodings of transactions and could be used to quickly determine if a project needs more financing. The fourth alternative offers all of the advantages and disadvan- tages of alternative three except it eliminates the budgeting problems. for developer pro'eots. These projects would be classified as Agency Funds and would have a separate series of fund numbers. No budgets are required for Agency Funds. RECOMMENDATION The fourth alternative is recommended because it has the greatest number of advantages, Agenda Number 3 - c11111 by Co unc -1 I Endov e I Ie�a.� Agenda Report D at TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director ` RE: Investments Custody Services Agreement DATE: December 7, 1987 Past practice has been to purchase investment securities - onl from reputable Y p financial i nstitutions and broker dealers. The securities p urchased . are generally held in safekeeping at the company they were purchased from. To improve the safety of City investments, consideration should. be i ven to having he securities transfers g 9 transferred to and held by a trust company. I have reviewed the fees and services provided by th trust comp anies: First Trust, Marquette Trust, and Norwest Trust. First Trust has the most comprehensive services and the lowest fees. Annual service charges will be about $1,400. g It is recommended that the City Council approve the execution of pp a custody agreement with First Trust and the establishment of the appropriate accounts to- implement the agreement. Agenda Number w Act by Council Endorse ej eeted Agenda Report )0aite T0: City Manager FROM: .Finance Director RE: Ordinance To Increase Hydrant Charge Rates (First Reading) DATE: December 4, 1987 The 1988 Budget adopted by the council includes a provision to increase hydrant charge rates by 20 %. The reason for the increase is to finance higher water system operations costs and to finance future unassessed water system improvements. Operations costs have increased due to repainting the exterior and interior of a water tank and due to addition of two more water tanks to the system. Also, there are large amounts of unassessed water system improvements that need to be financed such as the County Road C water main and two new water tanks. The attached ordinance w i l l implement a 20/ increase in rates 'and will increase revenues annually by $32,680. Also, this ordinance will increase rates an additional $.60 per quarter for condominiums* and mobile homes so that their rates will be the same as a single - family dwellings and be consistent with sewer rates. It is recommended that the Council approve the first reading of the attached ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO HYDRANT CHARG R ATES BE IT ORDAINED BY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 35 -52 of the Maplewood Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: There shall be levied a hydrant charge against all properties benefiting from fire protection created by the availability of water. - Such charge shall be imposed only within the St, Paul Water District service area where water mains are located, The hydrant charge shall be levied whether or not the property is connected to water mains. The rates shall be as f o l l o w s : (1) The quarterly residential rates shall be: Single Family Dwelling $3.00 Townhouse 3900 Duplex 6.00 Apartment 2.40 Condominium 3.00 Mobile Home 3900 (2) Non - Residential rates shall be $.11 per 1,000 gallons but no less than $3.00 per quarter. (3) The rate for properties used jointly for residential and commercial purposes that are not metered separately shall be billed at non- residential rates. (4) Users in excess of 25,000,000 gals. /month shall be charged based on the following formula: Projected Future Peak Day Usage of Customer X Annual Cash Projected Future Peak Day Usage of City Needs of $166,060 Section 2 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force beginning January 1, 1988.1 n AGENDA ITEM ^ MEMORANDUM by Coznkc"I:' TO is City Man��er �ndo sed_______ FROM: City Engineer "PVT d d_____ SUBJECT Acorn Greenhouses Assessment Cancellation RejeotedL__� Project 86-03 Dat DATE: December 7, 1987 Ou±lot C in the Acorn Greenhouses plat is covered by an easement for drainage and utilities. The owners cannot improve or build on the property due to the easement. This property was mistakenly assessed for the Stillwater Avenue water tower. The owners promptly paid the assessment of $237.50~ Subsequently, the owners requested that assessment be canceled and the amount paid refunded~ It is recommended the city council cancel the assessment of $2375.50 on Outlot C, Acorn Greenhouses and refund the amount paid. J STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT PROJ. NO. 86-3 W/TER SERVICE DISTRICT 6 IMPR0VEMENT YOUR ASSESGMENT |OR PARCEL NUMBER 24 IS A8 FOLLOWS: 1 WATER TANK UNITS AT $***237.50C) EACH = $****237.50 0 WATER MAIN F, F. AT 5, 000 EACH $* ^ V WATER SERVICES AT EACH ^ YOUR TOTAL ASGESGMENT .OR THIS PARCEL IS ' -------- $****237.50 PLEASE SEE ATTATCHED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND INGT�RUCTIONG. ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLFWOOD,MINNESOTA 55109 770-4550 N 0 T I C E O F P E N D I N G P U B L I C I M P R O V E M E N T MAPLE WOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME : WTRTNK86 3 I.MPROV.EMENT NO _ 5655 PROPERTY some DESCRIPTION -- ACORN GREENHOUSES SUBJ TO ESMTS TRACT C PINS ID SEc_Ik H_8dS_9 @I - - -IIl- 24 29 22 23 0037 ACORN ASSOC C/O E LOESCH 2376 MONTANA AVE ST PAUL MN 55119 (W a 10 -1111, fi nliff N Seat* . t,sch • 50 lost *DENOTES IRON MONUMENT PLACED 0 so too •EARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM SCALE IN FEET �' -. �� . ° ' � ` `� 1 . ri L_`r oat N I /s,sW m4,wrw -s" �. �.. N. LINE N us. NI/s. SWJ14AW 3 0 7 E Cr (rES7 OE[p) - Ntf•s7�O�E 71� l - — — M —" i/tM oo MM 9&70 ww �t M 20(100 x= 100.00 �VMW G � ! t LINE M. 8/2, x:/s.iN'fN,N /", SEC. l4 T � . 'Zi . v z �-S L WE N I/2. S VZ, N I /2, Ss/ 1.4 Mow I/4 �s7 CaIIM[Jt NII�I/1stC.l�.T.s1,RSt RGY.IUW r �'! LIME [ t/ s. sYS, M1 /s. =1r!/S,NOrI/1,sECS�T.lI.R.Zs Mfr conA [R NMW, sEC Ys, =tf,rt. s2 w' ACV tG'AA.I 1 { t Y i' u ' .�r�' AW Cie. sw l/y , N W I/4 « !3 ~ r12 vTIL r E 7 � 1 X10. i» j at 3C.4b � v "10) i 23 (cAsT : x 08 E 179.00 R ITSAS � • • t O w � I10.s1 w •1 14059 (W a 10 -1111, fi nliff N Seat* . t,sch • 50 lost *DENOTES IRON MONUMENT PLACED 0 so too •EARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM SCALE IN FEET �' -. �� . ° ' � ` `� 1 . ri L_`r oat N I /s,sW m4,wrw -s" �. �.. N. LINE N us. NI/s. SWJ14AW 3 0 7 E Cr (rES7 OE[p) - Ntf•s7�O�E 71� l - — — M —" i/tM oo MM 9&70 ww �t M 20(100 x= 100.00 �VMW G � ! t LINE M. 8/2, x:/s.iN'fN,N /", SEC. l4 T � . 'Zi . v z �-S L WE N I/2. S VZ, N I /2, Ss/ 1.4 Mow I/4 �s7 CaIIM[Jt NII�I/1stC.l�.T.s1,RSt RGY.IUW r �'! LIME [ t/ s. sYS, M1 /s. =1r!/S,NOrI/1,sECS�T.lI.R.Zs AGENDA ITE AGENDA REPORT -- U TO: City Manager ~ FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Fish Creek--Carver Avenue Storm Water Pond Modifleld_____� DATE: December 7, 1987 Dat INTRODUCTION Storm water detention ponds to serve the drainage area west of Interstate Highway 494 centered on Carver Avenue are identified in the lewood Drain PI an as being requisite to extensive development within their tributary drainage areas. The accompanying resolution directs the preparation of a feasibility study to determine how to implement the required storm water detention volume. BACKGROUND One of the conditions stipulated by the council for plat approval of Carver Heights Addition, City Project 86-19 was acquisition of pondinc.; and storm sewer easements for the referenced storm water pond. The developer was not able to secure the ponding easement on the adjoining property to the east. It was thereby necessary for Lots 9 and 10, Block 2 of Carver Heights Addition to be designated as a temporary pond with no outlet. The development of the storm water detention pond to serve the entire drainage area would allow for the conversion of these lots to residential lots and would facilitate other development within the drainage area. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing. 2a Order a feasibilit stud DISCUSSION 1. Do nothing will result in restrictions to development or damage to Fish Creek from excessive run-off rates. There is presently erosion damage in the downstream segment of Fish Creek~ The do nothing alternative is unacceptable. 2. Order feasibility study--the means for limiting storm water run off consistent with development and protection of Fish Creek will be evaluated. It is recommended that a +easibil it stud be ordered, jc RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS,itis proposed to establish astorm water detention pond to serve the drainage area roughly bounded by I-494, Carver Avenue, Dorland Road extended and Fish Creek and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended, i ^ _- AGENDA ITEM /- -2. AGENDA REPORT � ±������oz���I�. TOx City Manager �1 FROM: Assistant City Engineer Mc di f i��_____� SUBJECT: Hillwood Drive, City Project 86-05--Reduction of Reiected_____�� Retainage Dat DATE: December 7, 1987 INTRODUCTION Hillwood Drive, east of Crestview Drive, City Project 86-05 is essentially complete except for some tur+ establishment. The contractor, Danner, Inc., has requested a reduction in the retainage amount from 5% to 2% of the work completed. BACKGROUND Turf establishment for this project cannot be completed until spring 1988. A reduction of the retainage amount from 5% TO 2% is consistent with protection of the city's interest. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that a reduction in the retainage from 5% to 2% be authorized ft jc U � «, RESOLUTION REDUCTION OF RETAINAGE WHEREAS, th City Council a+ Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered the construction of Improvement Project 86-05 Hillwood Drive-east of Crestview Drive and has entered into a contract with Danner, Inc. for the construction of said improvement project. WHEREAS, the contractor has formally requested a reduction in the retainage percentage. WHEREAS, the state of completion of this project is such that a reduction in retainage fram 5% to 2% of the work completed is not adverse to the interests c»f the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD that reduction of retainage for City Project 86-05 to 2% is hereby authorized. 0Y. c000no��� / 0 1 f 10 ed___~__�~ �0 10 0 te�-----~�� bat AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROMx Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Developer Project, Project 86-11 DATE: December 7, 1987 Project86-11,Highwood Addition, has been certified as complete in accordance with approved plans and specifications and has satisfied the engineering department's requirements. It is recommended that the council pass the attached resolution which certifies as complete and accepts the public streets and utilities constructed under this project for maintenance and ownership. jc .� � RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITIES FROM DEVELOPER WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore entered into a contract for public improvements for City Project 86-11 described as Highwood Addition, and WHEREAS, said project has been certified as completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is completed and the Utilities are hereby accepted as part of the distribution systems. SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting the following. 1. A conditional use permit for a planned unit development ( PUD ) for a 60 -unit senior citizen housing development. 2. Approval for fewer parking spaces and garages than code requires. a. Two spaces per dwelling unit are required or 120. spaces. Only 87 spaces are proposed. However, an additional 34 spaces are provided in front of the garages, primarily to accommodate guest parking. b. Code requires half of the 120 required parking spaces to be garages. Only 40 of the 60 required garages are proposed. Spaces for eight additional garages are shown on the site plan (page 13). 30 A variance from the curbing requirement: Code requires "continuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot (parking) and, drives . . ." (Section 36-22[d]) No curbing is proposed. 4. Two setback variances. Section 36 -27 (a) states that "A landscaped area of not less than twenty (20) feet in width shall be provided where: (2) A multiple dwelling abuts property zoned for single or double dwellings." a. The abutting land to the south is zoned R -2, double dwelling. The setback to the driveway would be seven feet*. A variance of 13 feet is required,* b. The abutting land to the west. is zoned F, farm residence. The setback to the driveway would be 6 -1/2 feet. A variance of 13 -1/2 feet is required. Action b Council, MEMORANDUM Endor sod . Modi T0: City Manager of octo.. FROM: Director of Community Development Date — SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development, Approval f o'r' ' Reduced Parking and Three Variances LOCATION: Woodlynn Avenue, East of Ariel Street. APPLICANT.: Arkell Development Corporation OWNERS: Mathilda Howlett, A. Thomas, Joseph Jansen, Mary Hennemann, Cecilia and Michael Jansen and Leslie Hause PROJECT: Cottages of Maplewood DATE: December 1, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting the following. 1. A conditional use permit for a planned unit development ( PUD ) for a 60 -unit senior citizen housing development. 2. Approval for fewer parking spaces and garages than code requires. a. Two spaces per dwelling unit are required or 120. spaces. Only 87 spaces are proposed. However, an additional 34 spaces are provided in front of the garages, primarily to accommodate guest parking. b. Code requires half of the 120 required parking spaces to be garages. Only 40 of the 60 required garages are proposed. Spaces for eight additional garages are shown on the site plan (page 13). 30 A variance from the curbing requirement: Code requires "continuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot (parking) and, drives . . ." (Section 36-22[d]) No curbing is proposed. 4. Two setback variances. Section 36 -27 (a) states that "A landscaped area of not less than twenty (20) feet in width shall be provided where: (2) A multiple dwelling abuts property zoned for single or double dwellings." a. The abutting land to the south is zoned R -2, double dwelling. The setback to the driveway would be seven feet*. A variance of 13 feet is required,* b. The abutting land to the west. is zoned F, farm residence. The setback to the driveway would be 6 -1/2 feet. A variance of 13 -1/2 feet is required. niscussion The PUD is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan and should be a good neighbor to the adjacent homes. Seniors are quiet neighbors and the building is only one story with a residential style. Lot Division: The proposed site plan .includes 20 feet of property to the west of the property that the applicant controls. Approval of the lot division will require a revision of the site plan for the Salvation Army Church development. Required parking for the church is located within.the subject 20 feet which must be relocated. This site plan assumes a lot split will,also be approved for a small, land - locked parcel along the west property l i n e . ( Refer to the map on page 12.) There is room on the Salvation Army site to revise their plan.. Storm Sewer and Curbing: Code requires findings that a variance (s) is not required solely for financial reasons and that if approved, the project would not present a substantial threat to the general safety and welfare of adjoining property owners. These findings cannot be made if storm sewer and curbing are not constructed. The applicant is requesting these waivers on the basis of financial considerations. They are attempting to keep the rent in a particular range. Secondly, if this site is allowed to drain overland as proposed, localized flooding could result. The catch basins in the area streets are not designed to accommodate overland drainage from a site with as much impervious surface area as proposed. A street flooding problem already exists on Lydia Avenue to the southeast of this site. This existing problem could be intensified if this site is not storm sewered. Finally, each of the other subsidized housing. developments (Concordia Arms - seniors, Hazel Ridge-seniors, Knoll-family and Lundgren Apartments - family) approved in the past ten years has provided storm sewer and curb. In all but one.case (Hazel Ridge) , each of these projects is intended to serve a similar if not a lower- income population than that of the applicant's proposal. Recommendation I. Approve the resolution on page 28 to approve the Cottages of Maplewood planned unit development for one year, subject to the following conditions: A. This development shall not be converted to nonseniors housing without revision of the planned unit development. For purposes of this permit, seniors housing is defined as a residence occupied by persons that are 50 years of age or, older. B. Trailers and vehicles that are not required for day -to -day transportation needs shall not be parked on -site, unless the city determines that there are excess parking spaces available. C. If council determines that there is insufficient on -site parking after one year of 95% occupancy, additional parking may be required D. Adherence to the site plan date - stamped October 1, 1987 the floor plans date - stamped September 29, 1987, with the changes required by the community design review board. Future changes may be approved by the community design review board. II. Authorize 87 parking spaces, including 40 garages, rather than the code requirement of 120 spaces, including 60 garages, on the basis that A. The parking -space requirements contained in the zoning code .do not realistically apply to the proposed development, because these requirements are designed for family housing and do not consider the fewer number of cars per unit needed for senior housing. Be The city has approved a reduced number of parking spaces and garages for all previous senior developments. Co The reduced number of parking spaces has proven adequate for a similar project in Stillwater. III. Deny the concrete curbing variance, on the basis that: A. Omitting the curbing would not produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the ordinance. Curbing adds to the aesthetics and drainage of a site. Curbing also provides a definitive boundary for the parking spaces and the driveways that prevent roll - ups onto the yard area, as well as significantly .reduce the potential for yard damage from snowplowing. Be The variance is not required for reasonable and practicable physical development of the site. Rather, this variance is proposed solely on the basis of financial considerations. Co Each of the other subsidized seniors residences has provided concrete curbing.. IV. Approve a 13 -foot setback variance from the south lot line and a 13 -1/2 -foot setback from the west lot line, provided screening is included along the south lot line that meets the screening requirements of Section 36 -27 (c). Approval is on the basis that: 1. Senior housing creates less traffic noise than a conventional multiple- dwelling project. 20 . The building is only one - story. 3. The setback along the west property line is not needed since: a. The adjacent use is proposed to be a parking lot for a church. b. A 20 -foot setback and screening is required between the church parking lot and lot line. 40 Requiring screening along the south property line would compensate for the reduced setback. 3 5. The most common setback used by other cities is five feet. (See the survey on page 32.) 6. Certain regulations contained in this chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature - of the proposed development. 7. The variance would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 80 The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. 910 The variance would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people. 10. The variance is required for reasonable and practicable physical development and is not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS Twenty -five property owners within 350 feet of this site were asked their opinion of this proposal. Of the six.responses received, three were in favor and three were. opposed. One of the persons in favor stated that they are concerned about the drainage from the site i f concrete curb and adequate storm sewer are not constructed. Staff comment. Staff is recommending denial of the curbing variance and installation of storm sewer. The three persons opposed raised the following concerns: 10 I reject it because of the variance from required underground drainage (storm sewer) for all 60 units, because flooding on Woodlynn and Lydia Avenues will result. Staff comment : Staff i s recommending that storm sewer be required, 2. I object because my land-locked 56 X 264 foot parcel ( page 11 ) adjacent to the west property line is not included . "We are open to letting either of our neighbors (the applicant or Gerald Mogren, the developer of the 15 -lot Lynnwood Terrace plat to the south) purchase this land at a reasonable price. If Arkell Development were to buy our property, perhaps they would have sufficient square footage and would not. need the requested variance." Staff comment: This parcel was acquired after it went tax - delinquent. It would be desirable to have this parcel combined with an adjacent parcel. It would, however, be unfair to require the developer to acquire it. 30. See the letter on page 23.. The respondent questions the need for the project and opposes: a, less parking spaces, b, less garages, co less minimum site area for each unit, d. waiver concrete curbing and storm sewer, and e. the construction of more than eight units in each structure. Staff comments: Need for this development: 1. According to the market opinion that was prepared by Gary Stout of Public- Private Ventures in 1985 for the Harmony School Seniors Residence, Maplewood could absorb 156 new senior rental housing units 5 for occupancy in 1986 and up to 43.5 units each year thereafter through 1990, without causing a vacancy problem for existing seniors residences. 20 Only 75 of the 199 units projected to be needed through 1987 have been constructed: Assuming this 60 -unit project would be occupied. in 1988, a need would still exist for 107 units (199 + 43 minus 75 + 60). 30 The waiting lists for the existing senior residences are a. Archer Heights - 9 people b. Concordia Arms - 400+ c. Franklyn Park - 300+ TOTAL 709+ people Refer to the beginning of this report for comments on the variances. REFERENCE Site Description Gross area: 5.1 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North: Woodlynn Avenue. Across the street undeveloped property planned for RM, residential medium density use. East: Four single - dwelling homes South: Nine single - dwelling lots (final plat approval was granted on September 28, 1987) West: Two undeveloped parcels. The north parcel is part of the proposed Salvation Army Church site. The south parcel is a 56 X 262 foot land - locked parcel. The land - locked parcel is planned for RM, residential medium density use. Past Action The city has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for each previously approved senior development: 1- 03 -80: Concordia Arms 4- 11 -83: Hazel Ridge 5- 19 -86: Casey Lake (abandoned) Conditions: 1. "If council determines that there is inadequate on -site parking during its review one year after 95% occupancy, additional parking spaces may be required." 2. Areas shall be designated on the approved site plan for future parking spaces. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density 20 Permitted density: 22 people /net acre 3. Proposed density: 20.0 people /net acre (5.1 net acres) 4. Zoning: F, farm residence 5. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 36- 438(b) states: "It is the intention of this section and the other sections of this division relating to planned unit development to provide a 7 means to allow flexibility by substantial variances from the provisions of this chapter, including uses, setbacks, height and other regulations. Variances may be granted for planned unit developments provided that: " (1) Certain regulations contained in this, chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development. "(2) They would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. "(3) The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. "(4) The variances would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people. 11 (5) The variances are required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. b. Section 36- 442(b) requires ten findings to approve a conditional use permit. These conditions are listed in the resolution on page 28 . 6. Housing policy: In 1982, this site was one of seven sites within Maplewood evaluated by' Gary Solomonson Associates for its suitability for seniors housing. This site was determined to be the best among the seven sites. This study was undertaken as part of a city- sponsored effort to promote the development of owner - occupied seniors housing. The owner of this site wanted to develop rental units, hence, the site was dropped from consideration. A finding of the 1982 study was that area seniors would prefer a variety of housing styles and types to be made available in addition to the conventional apartment building (i.e. owner- occupied and rental townhouses, home sharing and senior group homes). Given these study results, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority has adopted an objective to promote a wider variety of senior housing opportunities within the community. This proposal is consistent with that policy. 7. Parking spaces and garages: Section 3.6- 22(a)(2) of city code requires at least two parking spaces for each multiple dwelling unit. One of these spaces must be • enclosed. Section 36 -22(a) allows the city council to authorize a different requirement. E? The city has approved a reduced number of parking spaces for all of the previous senior projects. Most other senior projects in the metro area have fewer parking spaces than two spaces for each unit. According to the attached survey on page 20, the median percentage of parking spaces to the number of seniors' units in suburban cities was 47% in 1979. A 1985 city survey of three local projects further confirms this finding: Archer Heights has added 7 -8 parking spaces since the above survey was done because of complaints from the residents of inadequate or inconvenient parking. This proposal is different from the seniors residences that have been constructed in Maplewood. It will be marketed to persons 50 years of age and up, many possibly still working. The existing residences require their residents to be 62+ years of age. For these reasons, the large parking variances. granted for Archer Heights, Concordia Arms and Harmony School (project dropped) may not.be directly comparable to this proposal. The approval of a 50% parking space variance for Hazel Ridge also may not be directly comparable. Hazel Ridge is marketed to persons 62 years of age and older. The rent also includes wellness programs which will probably result in a less automobile - oriented population than this development. So far, of the 39 units rented, only eight have an automobile. A similar development to which to compare the validity of the parking variance requests is the developer's Cottages of Stillwater development. That was, the first. of the "cottages" senior concept in the metro area. The 62 -unit first phase has had 59 units lived in since May or June of this year. Each of the units has one bedroom, and there is a garage for every two units...Five of the 59 (8.5 %) households do not have a car, three of 59 (5,,l%) have two cars and the rest have one car for each unit. Three or four units park recreational vehicles or trailers on site. The states that they rely upon on- street parking for guests (During the marketing of that phase, a strong demand was realized for two - bedroom units. About 80% of prospective two - bedroom households want a garage,,) On -site parking of trailers and recreational.vehicles is proposed to be banned. E No. of No. of Project No. of Units Parking Spaces Spaces Used Ratio Concordia Arms 124 100 50 810 Archer Heights 69 42 30 61% Franklyn Park 117 54 44 46% Hazel Ridge 75 75 - 100% Harmony School Project 62 62 100% Proposed Cottages of Maplewood 60 87 145% Archer Heights has added 7 -8 parking spaces since the above survey was done because of complaints from the residents of inadequate or inconvenient parking. This proposal is different from the seniors residences that have been constructed in Maplewood. It will be marketed to persons 50 years of age and up, many possibly still working. The existing residences require their residents to be 62+ years of age. For these reasons, the large parking variances. granted for Archer Heights, Concordia Arms and Harmony School (project dropped) may not.be directly comparable to this proposal. The approval of a 50% parking space variance for Hazel Ridge also may not be directly comparable. Hazel Ridge is marketed to persons 62 years of age and older. The rent also includes wellness programs which will probably result in a less automobile - oriented population than this development. So far, of the 39 units rented, only eight have an automobile. A similar development to which to compare the validity of the parking variance requests is the developer's Cottages of Stillwater development. That was, the first. of the "cottages" senior concept in the metro area. The 62 -unit first phase has had 59 units lived in since May or June of this year. Each of the units has one bedroom, and there is a garage for every two units...Five of the 59 (8.5 %) households do not have a car, three of 59 (5,,l%) have two cars and the rest have one car for each unit. Three or four units park recreational vehicles or trailers on site. The states that they rely upon on- street parking for guests (During the marketing of that phase, a strong demand was realized for two - bedroom units. About 80% of prospective two - bedroom households want a garage,,) On -site parking of trailers and recreational.vehicles is proposed to be banned. E If these characteristics hold true for the Maplewood population, the following parking space availability should occur: a. Five units (8o5%) should not have a car b. Three units (5.1 %) should have two cars c. Demand for resident parking spaces ( 60 - 5 + 3 ) = 58 cars P d. Available code-compliant spaces for visitors (87 proposed - 58 needed for residents) = 29 spaces e. Available guest parking in front of garages = 34 f. Total on -site parking spaces for visitors = 73 Public Works A two-acre-foot e -foot storm water and is planned by the city for the southeast corner of this site ( page 15 ) . This pond may not be needed P dependent upon the drainage plan proposed for the site. If the P existing low area is not eliminated, a storm -water pipe should be constructed to Lydia Avenue to drain this area. kd Attachment 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 39 Site Plan 4. Drawing of the Project 5. Excerpt from the Drainage Plan 6. Project Description /Variance Justification 7. Parking Survey 8. Letter from Raymond Hoyt 9. Letter from Ramsey County - -CDBG Funding 10. Resolution (PUD) 119 Setback Survey 12. Site Plan (Separate Attachment) 10 D - IC Ly) A n � R PUD R2; F ��BC 1 i m, i PJC R s LT' I F. R .� z r . R r k� D N R ` g�, ji F R Q 9!'- F F. R -'TWA ' L8C v c v ! 9 C _F I R lB Ln .� F LDC i t M I R M 1l�cj_. M I R � L LB C) • ? R i LA I a C -� R O . A WE F �.. J B . 0 F v • a- . M i Q! W, + ^ .7 LOCATION MAP ' 11 Attachment 1 'mss- Attachment 1 • dup 4; A • 4 OHO do V Y � f V N - ] � �mwww - WOOD LY �w r �. r r —• T _ r r -m -m rr r i _ -proposed . sp I i t line . land—locked parce 1 w 01.0 Nof V4 215 4' .•O• f�0 (�z 7 0 9 (30! �9) I 413 S e �� :..;: 4 9 MY5 :':: : f� ;�.;.. � : ::mil :• �...Y � :Y :;: :::: :.:� ' SALVA ION AR �•.: :.::::.ti 2 • t •.ti : •. •::•Y: �.. . :.. •. ' • :. . S : �• lyS.Y`..t• �~►1�• •:Y::. ; �;;,;,�. , 1f 1~ • . 4 • G / G rfi : • '�:i: • ?' •.ti ;. •.} :Lti -. {�; f} :ti• -.Yrr� � {.��1 :ti ::':•: ti..•::. ' 1, :u49 i 1 1 2 j t 4 214 ! _ _ ,. � - -- -- ,� —�j••� � Esc = i'TOl�f� Doc' 17 OL A A44 7 97 ` $ 2 ` 2 116 2'� 3 •O 29 Mr •. E 1 } 2� N tz 3: L 0 10 1 � _ _ k CL 01 07 Q 2 3 o Q ` 14� d 2 (1) 2 Z� ; �� w ° (12. t� « 6 �� r _ 14 J , cc 1 h in • _ 3 Af-A PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 12 Attachment 2 dip • 1 • f •, • t •• '�. ' • 1 001 dop 40 P ` / . • ++ ` so rk it r •. u . \ I ♦ I -AL — -- -- — --* - — INNEVANWAMEMM -- • r SITE PLAN Possible future Attachment � 3 3 garage space 4 N 4 h•f.. . f N 00 It �lf •�� • • •t • '' " •. • .�: ! Ste. y'� Carl tV Jl IF owl jt Im )�• * r ;., ; .�. •� �.� '�'` ,. ,` R ; !� • ��. �fe , : .`�,J 1. . ��� �. v j �y ... �I'� '.•,• 1 ' , �• .'Y. �' �� Ry,� ti. f' f • .�. '_F..��� •.J r ' •13 ���•�� - 4 F a ,.spa. r • � • �. It ! '`• , .• .,• • �.,�i • � h • . 40 A A ot � � ARC • �' 1 1I: • • - A � '• / � � � • •� ; � { '�y�♦ 7 •t � •..: � � r \ � � •rte'' t �• ./. 1 it , •+ � • � , • I . 1 4r r ` 10 i, Or COUNTY RD D" .............. ............................... .......................... 0000....... 0000....... ............... ... .............. ............................... ........................... .......................... . ......... • . ........ ............................... 0 0 0 0 .. . -. 11 . 0000.. 0 • ...................... • ... • . • • .. 1 ..! .�� .r = =l.. .�� /� �� .. . . moo O r 1 7AF Woodlynn Ave,- _ s AF N'.000- 1 / .. 2 A Applicants Site l 2 , 1 � Z I 1 . - - - - -- Lydia Ave. - .+. - ___.. - ____ ,.,4 i l i j 20 A F .3 t t ... t L � ♦ t 30 0,0 �--- ---- � � _0000_ ---- ---- --� ` t oi . M AJOR WATERSHEO DIVIDE .. .. .... .. ................... .............. ............................... . INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES -= PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42~ ' +•-"'•" Mote: The - :,wo- acre-foot pond is not EXISTING STORM SEWER . needed for the property north of OPEN CHANNEL Wood .Ave. Adequate storm sewer STORM WATER STORAGE ARE exists in Woodlynn Avenue The pond may INUNDATION AREA also not be needed dependent upon the STORAGE VOLUME _4 .4r proposed drainage for this site. DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS .................. EXCERPT FROM THE DRAINAGE PLAN Attachment 5 15 4 N THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE INTRODUCTION d Project is on a 60 unit housing The proposed Cottages of Maplewoo ] tract . project roposed construction on a 5.0 acre for construc for the elderly. p ] p approximately .of land lying south of Woodlynn Avenue and app Y 400 feet east of Ariel Street. EXISTING CONDITIONS rolling open land with a cover The land is now r 9 of wild grass and P very little tree growth.-The adjacent lands on the north and south are similar in app earance� i. The adjacent land to the west 'is the site Salvation Arm Church and for the proposed a Y Community Center and the land to the east is densely wooded residential area. • n Woodl nn Avenue to the north where water, The site has frontage, o Y -of - sewer, and storm drainage.lines exist in its right wa y . PROPOSED USE OF FACILITY �0 The applicant intends to develop the property into a 60 unit housing for the elderly project creating rentable. homes for people years and over With emphasis on independent living. Twenty (20) 1 bedroom _ homes and Forty (40) 2 bedroom homes will be co�rlstructed beginning in 1987 completing in late �go# I Pa ce.,% L er The one bedroom units are 650 square feet including Living Room, Dining Roomy and Kitchen equipped with stove and refrigerator and Laundry Room with hook -ups for Washer and dryer. Each unit has separate heat and hot water systems and each bedroom features a full length storage and clothes closet. The carpet shall be FHA approved and each unit will have Anderson double hung windows. The exterior is maintenance free with extensive use of aluminum siding and brick. Landscaping shall be professionally done and features 13' high Black Hills Spruce trees. Garages Will be available on a optional basis for residents of the project and site amenities include garden plots and gardens and a horseshoe pit. The Cottages of Maplewood are located in close proximity to the shopping facilities located at Maplewood Mall and are immediately adjacent to the Church and Community Center proposed by The Salvation Army. In additions an abundance of restaurants and other retail faciltities are in the immediate area and bus transportation is excellent only two blocks away. The City of Maplewood has an extremely high population of seniors. The concept of the Cottages of Maplewood is to provide the best possible living unit for the lowest rental dollar. There currently exists a void of seniors rental housing in the City of Maplewood in the $350 -$400 per month range for a one bedroom unit. The proposed Cottages of Maple- wood is targeted to fulfill that need currently existing in the City of Maplewood. j1) Option on site not acquired unitl August 19870 (2) Persons 55+ years of age made up 17.17. of Maplewood's population in 1980. 16 Attachment 6 THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS Variance No. 1 , -Code requires two parking spaces -per unit or.120 spaces. Only X are proposed. • 87 Justification • The City Code does not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of elderly housing. Most elderly residents have one vehicle per couple - and many elderly residents have - no vehicles at all. The applicant believes that the proposed parking count for this project would be consistent with the purposes of the City Code. The applicant-believes that the planned unit development proposed would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from - .ztrict adherence to the provisions of the City - Code. The applicant that the variances would not constitute a threat of a subjective nature to the property values, safety, health, or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land nor be detrimental to the - health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public. The applicant believes that the variance is required for reasonable and practical physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. Variance No. 2 Code requires one garage space per unit or 60 garages. Only 4 are proposed. Justification The City Code does not realistically apply to the proposed development be of the unique nature of elderly housing. Most elderly residents have one vehicle per couple and many-elderly residents have not vehicles at all. The applicant believes that the proposed parking count for this project would be consistent with the purposes of the City Code. The applicant believes that the planned unit development proposed would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of the City Code. The applicant believes that the variances would not constitute a threat of a subjective nature to the property values, safety, health, or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals of general welfare of the public. The applicant believes that the variance is required for reasonable and practical physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. 17 Variance No. 3 o f 7 Code requires 4,000 square feet of lot area per unit. only square feet per unit are proposed. Justification - The applicant believes that the regulations contained in the City Code do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the Cottages concept. The Cottages -concept is that of ' an apartment building with separate exterior entrances creating .a.living environment similar to a single family home environment many of the, elderly residents of-this'project would be accustomed to. The applicant believes that -this project would be consistent with the purposes of the City Code. The applicant. believes that the planned unit development would produce a development of equal superior quality which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of the City Code. The applicant believes that variance would not-constitute a threat of a subjective nature to the property values, safety, health, or general welfare of - the owners -or occupants adjacent or nearby land nor be detre mental to the health, safety, welfare, or general - morals of the public. The applicant believes that the variance is required for reasonable and practical' and. physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial requirements. Variance No..4 Code requires concrete-curbing around All-driver and parking spaces. None is proposed. Just i f i cat ion The applicant believes that the requirement for concrete curbing around all drives and parking spaces is cost_ prohibitive and inconsistent with the rural nature of the proposed Cottages development. If concrete curbing is required around all drive and parking areas, extensive and costly underground storm drainage piping will be required along with the costs for the concrete curbing and will require increases 'in the proposed rent structure which may inhibit leasing activities and jeopardize the financial success of the project. The applicant believes that the variance would not constitute a threat of a substantial nature to the property values, safety, health, or general welfare to the owners or the occupants of the adjacent or nearby land nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the peoples 18 Variance No. ,� ' � ... .. .... , .. :.. .. .., ....... .. _ .. :. _ ... .. .:.. Code requires that there -be.,no more than eight townhouse units per building. Justification The applicant believes that the regulations contained in the City Code do not realistically apply to the proposed development because -of the ` unique nature of the Cottages concept.. The Cottages concept -is that of an apartment building with separate exterior entrances creating a living environment . similar to a single family home environment many of the elderly residents of this project would be accustomed to. The applicant believes that -this project be-consistent with purposes of the City Code. The applicant believes that the planned unit development would produce. a development of equal or superior quality which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of the City Code. The applicant believes that the variance would not constitute a threat of a subjective nature to the property values, safety, health, or general Y 9 welfare of the owners or occupants adjacent or nearly land nor be detri mental to the health, safety, welfare, or general morals of the P ublic. The applicant believes that the variance is required for reasonable and practical physical development and are not required solely on the basis of financial requirements. ' 19 • 1 • ' PARKING SURVEY -- ELDERLY HOUSING Done in 1979 by Franklyn Park Associates & Weber's Investment Corp. DENSITY AND PARKING ANALYSIS SENIOR CITIZENS' HOUSING TWIN CI'T'IES SUBURBS I. MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGEN DEVEL OPMENTS Units Percentage Per Acre Parking ' 1. Richfield Seniors East 78th St. & Chicago Ave. So. Richfield, Mn. 2.61 acres 150 units 60 spaces, surface '' 57 40% 2. Robbins Landing 39th Avenue No. & W. Broadway Robb insdale Mn. 1.26 acres 110 .units 52 spaces, surface 87 .47% 3. Northeast Seniors Housing 39th Ave. N.E. & Stinson Columbia Heights Mn. 2.91 acres 85 units 30 spaces, surface 29 35% 4. Bridge Square Apartments River Avenue and Monroe Street Anoka, Minnesota 1.19 acres 101 units 30 spaces, surface 85 30% 5. Franklyn Park Apartments lst St. N.E. & Seppala Blvd. No. St. Paul Mn. 3.77 acres 117 units 54 spaces, surface 31 46% 6. Roseville Seniors Housing • 1045 West Larpenteur Roseville Mn. 4.56 acres 127 units 63 spaces, surface 28 50% 20 Attachment 7 Stories 7 7 3 M 4 Units Per Acre 7 . Bloomington Elder Housing 82nd St. & Knox Ave. So. Bloomington Mn. 4.69 acres 212 units 134 spaces, surface 45 8. Brooklyn Park Elderly 74th & Zane Ave. No. Brooklyn Park Mn. - 1.58 acres 110 units 46 spaces, surface 70 9. Boardwalk Central Ave. & Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata Mn. 77 units. 1.789 acres 38 spaces, surface 43 10. Dover Hill 2500 Rhode Island Ave. No. Golden Valley Mn. 234 total units of which 122 are Elderly Total 14. acres (including 3 acres on lake) Elderly portion less. than 1/3 of site- less than 5 acres 74 spaces, surface & garage, for Elderly 24 *Parking utilization less than 50% of spaces available ' 11. Fridley Apartments Mississippi & 7th St. NE Fridley Mn. " 9.8 acres - Elderly portion less than 1/3 of site - less than 3.3 acres 49 spaces, surface, for Elderly 31 12. Coventry 2800 North Snelling Ave. Roseville Mn. 195 total units of which 103 are Elderly 5 stories 8 acres - Elderly portion less than 1/3 of site - less than 3 acres 49 spaces, surface for elderly 34 Percentage Parking 63% 42% 49% 61%* 48% 48% Stories 15 V� 4 7 5 5 21 I II. FEDERALLY FINANCED & ASSISTED DEVEL•OPKENTS 22 Units Percentage Per. Acre _ Parkin_ Stories 13. Hopkins Village Apartments ' 9 Seventy Ave. So. Hopkins Mn. 166 total units— 907.+ are Elderly 11 stories 1.65 acres 166 spaces, surface 101 100 %* 11 *Less than 25% of Elderly tenants have cars. 14. Hamilton House 2400 Nevada Avenue So. St. Louis Park Mn. 110 units 2.5 acres 29 spaces, surface 44 26%* 4 *90% of parking spaces utilized — parking sufficient 15. Yorktown Continental Apartments 7151 York Ave. So. Edina Mn. 264 units Approximately 6 acres approx. 120 spaces, 112 surface & 8 garages 44 45%* 12 *Approximately 80% of parking spaces utilized. . Average 49% Medi an 47% 22 F S Properties Management FBS Properties Management, Inc. 1700 Soo Line Building P.O. Box 522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480 June 16, 1987 Mr. Geofe Olson; AICP Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road 8 Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson, CONCERNED CITIZEN After reviewing the proposed development for "THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD WOODLAND AVENUE", I am disturbed by the overall attitude of the developer in his concept of the City codes and how they should apply to him or better yet, how they should not apply to him in this particular project. The one statement that the developer did make that I fully agree with, is that the City of Maplewood has an extremely high population of senior citizens and this popoulation continues to grow with each new development. However, the residents that eventually move in to this development do not necessarily come from the City of Maplewood. A closer look at the latest population survey will give you a better overview of the age distribution that exists in the City of Maplewood. With the latest addition of the Salvation Army Church and the future development of St. Johns hospital, along with the present nvvaaber of senior citizen developments, I wonder very seriously if additional senior citizen housing projects are necessary in the City of Maplewood. In response to the variances requested by the developer, I offer the following comments for your reviews 1's variance on number of parking spaces. The statement made by the developer that senior citizens residents only have one vehicle per couple or many of thew do not have any vehicles at all, is a broad and a non - factual statement. This project is proposed for individuals 55 years and older with an emphasis on being independent. Where does it say that at 55 you have to turn in your drivers license or that you can have only one car? Also, where will the friends of the individuals who live in this complex park when they come to visit ?, or will they be prohibited from having friends who drive? The amount of off street parking requested is totally un- acceptable and this code should be upheld.. (continued) • , Attachment 8 Member First Bank System • 23 The developer has contradicted himself on this request. First he says that he will be only able to build 40 garages as the project is presently designed. Then he states that garages will be available on an optional basis. What happens if everyone wants a garage? Is he going to provide garages on a first come, first served basis until he reaches 40 and then put everybody else on a waiting list? Anyone who has lived in Minnesota through one of our average winters realizes that a garage is becoming more and more a necessity rather than a luxury especially for senior citizens who may not be able to brush the snow off their cars or who will have problems starting their cars after they have been sitting outside in below zero temperatures. 3. Variance on square feet. I have no problem with the proposed change to just under 4,000 square feet . per unit. However, not having seen the interior space layout for these units, I cannot comment on just how practical this development will be in regards to usage of interior space. 4. Variance on curbing. The applicant admits that the only reason why he does not want concrete curbing is because of the cost factor. He is not concerned with storm drainage or maintenance that will be necessary at a later date. He seems to believe that it either does not rain in Minnesota or that the streets will make an adequate drainage surface.. The request for concrete curbing, and I emphasize the word concrete is a must in Minnesota, with snow plowing and extreme temperature changes that take place, it is imperative that only concrete curbing be used in order to insure that they will last longer than one or two years. This, to me, is a definite must. 5. Variance on storage per unit. I see no problem with granting this variance and it seems to me he is complying with the code. 6. Variance on number of townhouses per unit. The builder is strictly putting this :project together for monetary reasons and thus trying to get as much as possible on this site and attempting to cover this situation with the idea of the concept of the development and as he uses the term "cottage concept ". This is strictly a monetary decision and has no basis as it regards to the overall concept of the project. 24 AL ..:. t* 7. My overall opinion of the project is that the idea of providing first class housing for senior citizens is an outstanding idea.. However, the developer is waving the senior citizen flag in the hope that you will not see the real reason for this proposed project development . and that is for him to snake money. If he was trying to impress sae with his proposed garden plots and a horse shoe pit, I was not. The statement that the applicant continues to make that he believes that the variances would not constitute a threat of a subjective nature to the property values, safety, health, or general welfare of .the owners or occupants adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, welfare, or general morals of the public, I am in complete dis- agreement with the developer on this statement. A closer look at the site plan indicates that this project is the next thing to being a maze. He has crowded as many senior citizen cottages into this space as possible. He has left very little greenery and has turned this project into one big maze. The artists rendering of what the elevation will look like is very impressive however, I don't believe there will be any particular place on this site that you will be able to stand back far enough to get the particular elevation view as shown on his drawing. The artist has done an outstanding job of showing plenty of greenery and the white picket fences in order to help sell this project. However, when you look at the overall site plan, such a concept is hard to visualize. My initial recommendation would be to first verify the need for additional senior citizens housing in the City of Maplewood and if the need did exist then proceed with the proposed project following the existing codes that are now in existence and were in existence prior to the developer putting this project together. Should you want any additional input from me in regards to the development of the project, I would be glad to sit down with you or any member of the planning commission. Sincerely, x� na c. Hoyt 299 Furness Court Maplewood, MIId 55109 25 AL- RAMSEY COUNTY Office of the Executive Director 286 Court House 15 W- Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 298.5980 Terry Schutten, Executive Director County Commissioners Diane Ahrens John T. Finley Ruby Hunt Duane W. M(-Cflrty I IaI Nottlaid Donald E. Salvercia Warren W. Schaper September 10, 1987 Mr. Geoffrey Olson City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Geoff: The Community Development Advisory Committee continues to view the proposal for the Cottages of f-laplewood favorably and expresser a desire to fund the activity at its meeting today. I3owever, the information which HUD confirmed only last week with respect to what we can fund leaves us with uncertainty regarding the viability of the project. In order to bring a disposition to this matter the County will tentatively allocate $252,500 for the project until November 30, 1987. This figure includes the cost of the land and an allowance to secure an appraisal on the land which will be required by HUD. In the interim the following steps should be taken: 1. Financing for the entire project should be solidified. This includes the City's affirmative response to the Developer's request for a tax exempt bond issue and confirmed clarification as to how the shortfall from the requested $400,000 and the actual $252,000 which we can offer will be net. Tile County takes no position on how the shortfall should be met. An actual bond sales need not take place* 2. A new proforina showing an updated budget for the project including all of the sources of revenue as they actually are anticipated. This proforma should be coinp1eted at tale t ilne all sources of revenue are pinned down for the project. 3e A statement from the City of Maplewood that the project has met all of the requirements of the City, including any citizen participation or public hearing requirements wh ich the City may have. t�':l� l:��OL a -- rip SL. ilia � ��: � ?: ' N '> � ^ f: -; . t���1 •.�•� G"��F�' 3 �1 �'�• Zr1 1�. �- �.� �'.. r �i A..� re 1S requested on or before October 30, so we may remain up to date 26 Attachment 9 q 1 � '� �► ML ': Should you have questions or need assi stance. during thiS ti me, please do not hesitate to contact me. Ile are very enthusiastic about the potential for this project and look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, -C-1 0 ' � Judy A. Raron, Director Community and Economic Development cc: Commissioner Norgard John Bossardt Charlotte Scott - HUD 27 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1987 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Arkell Development Corporation initiated a conditional use permit for the Cottages of Maplewood planned unit development at the following- described property: The south 662 -87 feet of North 1325.74 feet of East 263.63 feet of Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of Section 2, Town 29, Range 22 g , and; The West 263.63 feet of East 527.26 feet of North 1321.30 feet of Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of Section 2, Town 29, Range 22, and; The East 20 feet of the following parcel, the East 263.634 feet of the West 790.902 feet of the North 1265.7 feet of the NE 1/4 in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, and; The East 20 feet of the following described parcel, the south 5.5.6 feet of the North 1321.3 feet of the East 263.634 feet of the west 790.902 feet of the NE 1/4 in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 110 This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) on October 6, 1987. The HRA recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. 2 The site plan and building elevations for the proposed development were reviewed by the.Community Design Review Board (CD RB) on November 24, 1987. The CDRB recommended to the city council that said permit be approved, 3. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on November 16, 198.7. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved, 28 Attachment 10 .40 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on December 14, 1987. Notice thereof was published mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved for the Cottages of Maplewood. planned unit development, subject to the following conditions: A. This development shall not be converted to nonseniors housing without revision of the planned unit development. For. purposes of this permit, seniors housing is defined as a residence occupied by persons that are 55 years of age or older. B. Trailers and vehicles that are not required for day -to -day transportation needs shall not be parked on -site, unless the city determines that there are excess parking spaces available. C. If council determines that there is insufficient on -site parking after one year of 950 occupancy, additional parking may be required. D. Adherence to the site plan date - stamped October 1, 1987 and the floor plans date - stamped September 29, 1987, with the changes required by the community design review board. Future changes may be approved by the community design review board. Approval is on the basis of the following findings of fact: 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter, 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3e The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness., electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public f a c i l i t i e s and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 29 910 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval includes a 13 -foot setback variance from the south lot line and a 13 -1/2 -foot setback variance from the west lot line for a driveway. Approval of the variances is on the basis that: 1. Senior housing creates less traffic noise than a conventional dwelling project. 2.. The building is only one - story. 3e The setback along the west property line i s not needed since: a. The adjacent use is proposed to be a parking lot for a church. b. A 20 -foot setback and screening is required between the church parking lot and lot line. 4. Requiring screening along the south property line would compensate for the reduced setback. 5. The most common setback used by other cities is five feet. (See the survey on page 32.) 6.. Certain regulations contained in this chapter do not realistically apply to the proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development. 7. The variance would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 8. The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. 9. The variance would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people. 10. The variance is required for reasonable and practicable physical development-and is not required solely basis of financial considerations. 30 Adopted this day of j - 1987* Seconded by Ayes - -. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 198 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same. relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 31 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS MULTIPLE DWELLING ADJOINING SINGLE OR DOUBLE DWELLING PROPERTIES Setback to Side or Rear Property Lines Private Open Parking Dwelling Ci Driveway Space Garages Structure Coon Rapids 5' 5' 5' 25' Roseville 5' 5' or 20' from a 15' side principal struc- 30' rear ture on the ad- - joining lot whichever is - greater & within - 300 from the dwell- ing entrance Plymouth 15' 20' No 20' detached garages Brooklyn Center 15' 15' 15' 15' or twice the height of bldg, which- ever the greater Fridley. 15' 5' 5' Sideyard: 15' + l' for each 4' over 35 o f bldg height Rear yard: 200 of depth with a min. of 25' & a max, of 40' Blaine 15' 25' 20' 20' Shoreview 5' 5' 5' side .30' 10' rear Crystal 15' 15' 5' 15' side 40' rear White Bear Lake 5' 5' 5' 15' side 30 rear Woodbury 10' 10' (Same as for 20' side structure) 35' rear + 1' for ea. 1' over 35' 32 Attachment 11 c 0 to 25 0 to 50 2 to 50 10 to rI L Oakdale 5' 10' S' 10 20' N. St. Paul None None 3' 20 50 1 Vadnais Hgts 5' 10' S' 15' or the height of the bldg whichever is greater Little Canada 5' 15' 15' 30' to 50' (ease -by- ease) Eagan 5' 10' 10' 30' + 1, for each ft. above 35 Apple Valley 5' 5' 10' 40 1 Maple Grove 5' None 15' side 15' side 40' rear 40' rear Golden Valley 25' 25' 50' 50' New Brighton 15' 15' 30' 30' South St. Paul None None 2 -5' 9' side 25' rear West St. Paul None 10' 10' 40' + 1/2' for each ft. above 50' Cottage Grove (T.Hse) 5' 25' 25' 25' (Apts) 5' 50' 50' 50' Burnsville 5' 15' 10' 40' New Hope 10' 10' 20' side 20' side 35' rear .35' rear Columbia Hgts 1' 10' 2 -10' side 1/2 bldg hgt, or 10' whichever greater 3 -20' rear 1/2 bldg - hgt or 20' whichever greater. Range 0 to 25 0 to 50 2 to 50 10 to 50+ Most Common 5 10 10 25 to 40 Maplewood 20 20 20 20 to 75 33 F1___/ MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Tax - Increment and Tax - Exempt Financing LOCATION: Woodlynn Avenue, East of Ariel Street APPLICANT: Arkell Development Corporation PROJECT: Cottages of Maplewood DATE: November 10, 1987 Introduction The applicant is requesting $2.8 million in tax- exempt financing and $275,000 in tax - increment financing for the 60 -unit Cottages of Maplewood development for older adults which is proposed south of Woodlynn Avenue and east of Ariel Street. The purpose of this financing request is to reduce the rents of this project to be affordable to low and moderate income seniors. The tax - exempt financing would reduce the developer's interest costs. The tax- increment financing would pay for site improvements , such as curbing, sidewalks, landscaping and utilities. Background 1. Tax-increment financing uses the increase in taxes from a new development to finance projects with a public purpose. These taxes would normally go to the city, county, school district and other agencies that are funded by property taxes. One of the justifications for tax - increment financing is that the project would not be built and taxes generated without this financing. 2. The city council adopted the original tax- increment financing plan on October 28, 1985 and modified it on June 23, 1986 and September 28, 19870 3. Tax - exempt financing reduces the interest rate for the developer's financing. This is money that normally would have gone to the federal treasury. 4. The city has approved tax - exempt financing for two previous senior housing projects - Hazel Ridge and the Harmony School project. The city also approved tax - increment financing for two senior housing projects and a first-time home buyers program in 1982. This project was dropped. 5. In 1982 and again in 1985, the Housing Authority conducted surveys that asked seniors to indicate their preferred type of housing. A number of the respondents chose housing types other than the conventional rental apartment (i.e. condominium /townhouse, home sharing, senior group homes) . On the basis of these surveys, the HRA has adopted an objective to promote the availability of non conventional senior housing options within the community. This townhouse style development is unique to this area and is, therefore, consistent with the HRA's policy of promoting a wider variety of senior housing options. 6. Based upon previous market studies and the present waiting lists for area senior residences, there appears to be a need for this housing, 7. Ramsey County has authorized $252,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for this project. Discussion There is a need for senior housing in our area, - al though the HUD office reports that there is a surplus of higher income senior housing in the metro area. There are long waiting lists for existing projects in the Maplewood area and a projected need of 43.5 units each year through 1990. As the baby boom generation ages, there should be a continuing demand for this type of housing. Providing lower rents for older adults helps to fill a public need. (See article on page 12.) This problem is compounded by the cutback in federal housing programs. 1. Financing The tax- increment. financing makes. sense in this case. This project would cost the city $385,000 ($275,000 to the developer and $110,000 in financing costs) . The project would generate $150,000 each Y ear in increased taxes. The project would pay for the city's costs in 2.6 years. It is unlikely that this site could be developed by another project within this time, if the Cottages project did not develop. Requiring that the city receive a percentage of the sale of the property in proportion to the city's investment of tax - increment funds over a five percent * appreciation each year will allow the city to i share n any windfall profit. 2. Design Improvements In 1986, council adopted a policy to require eight of sixteen design upgrade options on page 6 to be incorporated in a development in exchange for city approval of tax- exempt financing. Thi s is the first proposal to be considered following the adoption of the design upgrade policy. The problem is that the list Pg P st of design options does not give credit for many of the amenities that are particularly important to older adults. These amenities include: a. A superior site location, readily accessible by public transportation and very close to medical and shopping f a c i l i t i e s ; b. A one - level patio home concept with separate entrances and grassed, "private -- appearing" yard area outside their door and windows; C* flower or vegetable garden plots next to their entrance; 2 d. hook -ups for a full- -sized washer and dryer in each unit; e. garage or parking space (s) readily accessible from each unit; f. large windows in the living rooms and bedrooms of each unit for as much natural lighting as possible. The project does include four of the design options in the city's criteria: 10 distinctive, non- generic style 2, dead bolt locks 3* all parking spaces at least ten feet wide 4, recreational walkways or sidewalk The reduction of the number of design upgrade options from eight to four is acceptable on the basis that: 1. Several senior - citizen -- oriented design amenities will.be incorporated in this project. 2. This development would provide a senior housing opportunity that does not exist in this area. A policy of the HRA, since 1981, has been to promote the availability of a wider variety of senior housing options. Recommendation I . Approve the resolution on page 13 to grant preliminary approval of tax -- exempt mortgage revenue financing and the housing program for one year for $2.8 million to construct the Cottages of Maplewood. Approval is subject to the city's requirements for tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing, except that only four of. the eight design upgrading options shall be required. In addition, the project shall comply with the following income requirements: A. 20% of the units shall be occupied. by households that have an adjusted gross income of. 50% or less of the metropolitan median . income, unless the developer elects to provide 40% of the units complying with the 60% of median income requirement• Be 75% of the units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110% of the metropolitan median income, and C. 51% of the units shall be affordable to households which have adjusted gross incomes of no more than 80% of the metropolitan median income. 3 II. Approve the resolution on page 24 revising the city's development program and tax - increment plan to include $275,000 for land acquisition and on-site improvements and $110,000 in financing costs for the Cottages of Maplewood Seniors Development, subject to receiving a percentage of the sale of the property in proportion to the city's investment of tax - increment funds over an annual appreciation of .5 %0 The actual amount to be approved of the development is determined submitted to document the amount rents affordable to the average years of age. The person chosen approved by the city, will be decided once the total cost and once an independent appraisal is of public financing needed to achieve Maplewood resident between 50 and 70 for the appraisal work shall be 4 REFERENCE Past Actions 10 Tax - Exempt Financing -- Seniors Housing .1- 14 -85: Council granted preliminary approval of $5.8 million of tax - exempt financing for up to 100 units for the Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. (Final approval has been granted and construction is complete.) 11- 25 -85: Council granted preliminary approval of $6.5 million of tax - exempt financing for the 116 -unit Harmony School (Casey Lake) Seniors Residence ( County Road C and White Bear Avenue), subject ' ec t to construction beginning within one year. (This approval has expired and the project has been abandoned.) 2. Tax - Increment Financing -- Seniors Housing 'In 1982, council gave concept approval to using tax - increment financing to assist with the development of a seniors housing project. The project would have used approximately $150,000 of tax-increment funds for each of two senior housing developments (Hazel Ridge and Bennington Woods) . Those developments were proposed to be owner - occupied. The program also included a first -time home buyer component financed with tax - exempt financing. Interest rates fell and the program was abandoned. Housing Policy and Requirements 10 Tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing: a. The following requirements have been adopted by council for approval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing 'for multiple dwellings: (1) The development shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) The development will not have a negative impact on the vacancy rates of existing multiple dwellings .in' the city. (3) There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the federal low-to-moderate income requirement over the life of the bond issue. (4) The bond indenture agreement shall require: (a) The developer to annually certify to the city and trustee, on the anniversary date of the bonds, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. (b) The program trustee, as approved by the city council, shall inform the city of any noncompliance trends. 5 (5) Payment of an annual program participation fee. (The formula is established at the time of final approval.) (6) Prevailing wage requirements the construction workers* (7) Design upgrading options which must include eight of the following items: (a) Brick (b) Building design should be a distinctive, non - generic style with meaningful details. (c) A noticeable increase in size and quantity of landscape plantings over what is normally required (d) Underground irrigation of all landscaping (e) Usable open space provided above code minimum (f) Electrical outlets adjacent to at least half the parking stalls for car heaters (g) A children's play area (h) Deadbol t locks (i ) Security system (j) Swimming pool, tennis court, indoor multi- activity room or outdoor multi- activity building (k) At least 10% more parking spaces or garages than code requires (1) Underground parking or parking under the dwelling unit (m) Setbacks above code minimums (n) Floor areas above code minimums (o) All parking stall widths at least ten feet (p) Recreational walkways or sidewalk 2. Housing bond plan amendment: Council's adoption of the housing bond plan in October, 1982 authorized the use of tax - exempt financing for multiple dwellings.. This plan, however, did not include specific development programs. As a result, each time a development is approved for this.financing, council must adopt a specific housing program for that development. The program must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council before the developer's request for the tax-exempt p financing can be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. CG 3. 4. Need for this development: a. According to the market opinion that was Stout of Public- Private Ventures in 1985 for Seniors Residence, Maplewood could absorb 156 housing units for occupancy in 1986 and up to year thereafter through 1990, without causing for existing seniors residences. prepared by Gary the Harmony School new senior rental 43.5 units each a vacancy. problem b. Only 75 of the .199 ( 43 -and 156 ) units projected to be needed through 1987 have been constructed. Assuming this 60-unit project would be occupied in 1988 , a need would still exist for 107 units (199 + 43 minus 75 + 60)0 c. The waiting lists for the existing senior residences are: (1) Archer Heights 9 (2 ) Concordia Arms - 400+ (3) Franklyn Park - 300+ 700+ Required Income and Rent Limitations Market rate units -Rent (includes utilities) $324 (1 bedroom) $511 (1 bedroom) $484 (1 bedroom) $575 (2 bedroom) a. Federal law requires one two income limitations to be enforced for 15 years to qualify for tax- exempt financing: (1) At least 20% of the units must be occupied by households with adjusted gross incomes of .50% or less of the metropolitan median income, or; (2) At least 40% of the units must be occupied by households with adjusted gross incomes of 60% or less of the metropolitan median income. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOMES FOR 1987 Percent of Median Income One Adult Two Adults 50% $12,938 $14,438 60% $15,525 $17,776 b. The county is requiring that 51% of the units must be affordable (not more than 30% of gross income) to households with adjusted gross incomes of 20% or less of the metropolitan median income. For one- person households, the 80% ceiling is $21,300. For two - person households, the 80% ceiling is $24,301. In 1987, monthly rent, including utilities, would have been limited to $532.50 a month for a one - bedroom unit or $607.50 for a two- bedroom unit. 7 c . The applicant is proposing 1988 rents of $385 plus $60 (heating /cooling and electricity) = $445 per month for a one - bedroom unit and $485 plus $70 (heating /cooling and electricity) = $555 per month for a two - bedroom unit. d.. The city should also require that at least 75% of the units must be occupied by households with adjusted gross incomes of 110% or less of the metropolitan median income ($30,038 for a one - -adult household and $34,.914 for a two - adult household) This restriction was required with. each of the previously approved tax - exempt financing requests. This requirement is more justifiable in this case because of the additional direct subsidy with tax- increment funds. 5. Competitiveness With Existing Senior Residences: The rents for the proposed units would not be directly subsidized through the Section 8 or Section 202 programs, as with the Archer Heights and Concordia Arms residences: The design of this development will also attract persons generally younger and more independent (transportation and socially) than the Archer Heights and Concordia Arms residences. Archer Heights and Concordia Arms require their residents to be 62 or older. This development would be marketed to-persons 50 years of age and older. Archer Heights and Concordia Arms also have congregate areas which this proposal w i l l not have. This project also should not compete directly with the Hazel Ridge units. Hazel Ridge's rents range from $575 to $795 for one bedroom and $795 to $1,600. for two - bedroom units. These rents include wellness programs that will not be available at. the proposed development. 6. Suitability of the Site for a Seniors Residence: In 1982, a site evaluation of potential senior housing sites was conducted for the city by Gary Solomonson Associates. That study considered seven sites, including this site. This site was found to be the best suited for senior housing. kd Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 40 Newspaper Article 5. Resolution (Tax - Exempt Financing) 60 Tax- Exempt Financing Plan 79 Resolution (Tax - Increment Financing) 80 Development Program and Tax - Increment 90 HRA Minutes Financing Plan 0 R 3 •ru _ _ • 8C GALL ..,. Av _ dM R i F R z R R _ r f _. �• R C1 • r • � C r 9C '� ...��� . .Art • R -� R R 8C 8 C g rim Roof _ olliftc LBC 4101�� — -.fi,;— Fat;; I I 1. Q i act R2-4- "DAtt _• RC(M) PUO R2 s L8C + - f F o F � .,� R 3� .• � PUO t• R U 73.j F i R CR . 2 PV0 a F R R F R s ' r J LAC 9 C� F � n I R o L8� Is R Lac � F E,V MI R -- — M I R ' t L80 �... r R - 3C - ._ a d J ; V • •�� R r C7 C R o R � 1 •- F _._ sc • a • MI W u . -i I r r' � • • � T I � �� ,r � • LOCATION MAP '• 9 _Attachment 1 4 N 7N T 293 &As LW Lor 1/4 JL43 L63 63* ' A4 3,43 0 s p 13-30 &C. 7 31 rs• 00 di C10 y 0 0 �1 4w 40 _ _____ __ _____________ _ OW u dw 4w mm 4ft qw 40 -W _______ _ ____ _ ____ v a Y • p l 4m 4w dab dw am 4w 4w w IN proposea . 9p i i t line - -• : .. land—locked parcel Z < II •: •.::.: tiff X :f f •:,,•.. :.•f;: % �'' 1' 4 2 ' 154 :�:: ;:vti.v: :.{r'rt• � : ti� "v: :.•.•: v s' {:� :rr.; �f{:'v. ?i+• :• . .. r .. {: {::.vti•.... . e ' SALVA ION ARM Y5) a c � S T E •.v.; :.i►•::.�•rwr.�ti% ' �v::r ?: i �'�'r,' rid i •.w:.: }•r % 81 if:'r: •i C : ' ,•'•. .. f ir` %:•: •, ti . 1 Q •::�:• : ° . %�•f. r •i: r: r r .•.'r r, :4::::: • \,� ,• ,•; f 0 (M M 'i :' . % •l:.:. J rt't: ::. ., {. K�,X {ri .`� 1... �Y.•r.1 No Ito t %4 214 ;. s2 • •• its i j I+4 7 40 , poc '?1of 97 8 2��5, co 21'6 . 20 3 .0 29 lo�.w' �o�• EI ) 3 I o. 1 2 1 13 • • 10.91 L � i w • Z 9 ��7� a �14� (7) CL J + • w , ftff CL �• 14 ;� h _ 1.44 ' • PROPERTY LINE* ZONING MAP 10 • Attachment 2 3 ' � • 7TH • / � � I • • Possible future ga space IF SITE PLAN 11 Attachment 3 MMMOMMOW Ct N • W06Pl.YN N avr� Aar Dakot C t Y o P fin hin r fo �enior g s By Jim Adams -West St. Paul can have an income of Staff Writer � up to $24,300 for a couple, Erickson Dakota County residents for the first time next year will pay a small part of their property taxes into a housing fund for lower - income senior citi- zens. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) will levy a tax to help make up for cuts in federal funding for senior housing, said Mark Ulfers, HRA executive direc- tor. Ulfers noted that a study done this year for the county estimated that about 2,300 of 3,400 lower- income seniors need help in finding low -cost housing. The county is assisting the other 1,100. Ulfers said the waiting • period to get into one of the county's eight subsidized buildings for seniors is one to four years. Residents pay 30 percent of their income for rent. Within three years, the HRA expects to have collected enough taxes to build a 65 -unit building and offer subsidized rents for seniors, Ulfers said. The county board last month unani- mously approved the HRA's propos- al to levy one -third of 1 mill that will raise about $616,666 in the first year for senior housing. This is the first time the HRA has used its taxing ability, Ulfers said. The board approved the HRA levy because there is such a pent -up de- mand for housing for 'seniors in the county," said Chairman Steve Loed- ing. "Most people think of Dakota County as predominantly a young county. But we have a great number of seniors in West St. Paul and South St. Paul: We are also seeing greater "Most eople think ofDakota . County as predominantly a young county. But we have a great number of seniors. in West St. Paul and .South St. Paul. - Steve Loeding, chairman, Dakota County Board needs of the aging population in the western suburbs, and we need to plan in advance to provide for senior housing. About 15,000, or 6 percent, of county residents are seniors, and that num- ber is growing rapidly, Ulfers said. The number of county residents age 65 or older increased 59 percent dur- ing the 1970s, compared to 27 per- cent in the metropolitan area, accord- ing to census information. About 1,120 county seniors receive housing assistance. About 430 of them live in apartments or homes and - receive rent assistance, which restricts income to $13,500. for one person or $15,450 for two seniors, said Kan Erickson, HRA deputy di- rector. Seniors living in the HRA- managed Colleen Loney Manor in 12 People looking 'for moderate - priced senior housing call several times a month to Dakota Area Resources and Transportation for Seniors (DARTS), said Janet Woodhull, manager of DARTS volunteer home services program. The HRA's proposed 65 -unit project will be a welcome addition that will reduce waiting lists for senior hous- ing, Woodhull said. "I think we will see a need for more and more low - income senior housing," she said. Woodhull said she often sends vol- unteers to visit and help seniors liv- ing in large apartment complexes. Because there are so few older peo- ple now in the western part of the county, there are no services yet. No grocery stores deliver. It is really tough for those people." She said there also is a housing need "fora people in the middle who are not eligible for subsidies" and can't afford expensive market rate housing for seniors, which can cost $1,000 a month or more. A study done in March by Health Planning Management Resources looked specifically at senior housing needs in three cities, as well as coun- ty -wide. The study found that Eagan needs 287 units for low- income sen- ior §, Burnsville needs 250 units and Apple Valley needs 69 units. The three suburbs now have - no subsi- dized senior housing. Two senior housing projects being built in West St. Paul will provide 86 subsidized units and 102 units priced at market rates, Erickson said. But those two buildings and the HRA proposal "won't make a dent in the number of units needed, especial- ly by the time ours is built," Erickson said. "It will definitely be an im- provement, but they won't begin to meet the needs, according to our waiting lists throughout the county." The waiting list has more than 450 seniors on it, she said. About 300 people have expressed in- terest in the 60 -unit subsidized build- ing, Mt. Carmel Manor, being built in West St. Paul, Ulfers said. The 128 -unit Westwood Ridge Apart- ments will have about 26 subsidized units, said Erickson. Attachment 4 597Z' RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI- FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF FINANCING PROGRAM FOR APPROVAL TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF.NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM (THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act) confers upon cities, or housing and redevelopment authorities or port authorities authorized by ordinance to exercise on behalf of a city the powers conferred by the Act, the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one"or more multi- family housing developments within the boundaries of the city; (b) The City has received from The Arkell Development Corporation (the "Developer ") a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds obligations (in one or more series) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) The City desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing f acilities.designed for occupancy by elderly persons; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and 1 Attachment 5 !3 the Project wi.I ]_ assist the City i n achieving these objectives. (d) The Developer .is currently engaged in the business of real estate development. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the.acquisition, construction and equipping of a 48,000 square foot (approximately) multifamily rental housing development of approximately 60 rental units located south of Woodlynn Avenue & East of Ariel Street, in the City of Maplewood, and consists of the construction and equipping of buildings thereon which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons within the community; (e) The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible, (f) A public hearing on the Project and.the financing program therefor was held on December 14, 1987 after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, subd. 5, at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted and considered; (g) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the ,Project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:. 1. The City hereby gives prel i.mi.nary approval to the.proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and.the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the acquisition and construction of multi - family 2 ) OL rental. housing facil. i.ties w_ith.i.n the .Ci Ly pursuant to the Devel.oper's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in the total principal amount.of approximately $2,800,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition and construction of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest -of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City, acting by and through the City, hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue it.s bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions;. 20 At the option of the City, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of., the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be consented to by the Developer. 3. On the basis of information available to the City it appears,'and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multi - family housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C._02 of the Act; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish s.ch� inancing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the. Project, and that the effect of the. Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi - family senior rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, and to.promote more intensive development and use of land within the City; 4. The Project and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval. by the City subject to the_.,, approval of the financing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ( " MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the ......Developer and the purchasers of'the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the project; 5. In accordance with subdivision 5 of Section 462C.05, Minnesota Statutes, the .City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to submit the program for financing - the project to MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, and employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide MHFA'with preliminary information as it may require; 3 6. The Developer has agreed and 1f_ 1s hprehy determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the - project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer; 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or .trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates.and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval , 8. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not consitute a charge, lien or encumbrance,.legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City, except such property as may be expressly pledged for the security of the Bonds. The Bonds shall recite in substance that Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. .9....In anticipation of the approval by MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project., and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short-term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 4 ( jo 10 . The actions n F City Sta f f in causing the not i.ce of public hearing to be published in the Maplewood Review are hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted. 11. The Developer shall enter into various agreements with the City which shall impose the following restrictions on the Developer and the Project: (a) Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval on the Project (December 14, 1987). The City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is shown. (b) Contracts entered into with Contractors doing work on the Project shall provide that: (i) the Contractor shall not discriminate in the hiring or firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. (ii) the Contractor shall compensate employees with wages and financial remuneration as provided under the United States Code, Section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.440 (iii) the Contractor shall be required to employ Minnesota residents in at least 800 of the jobs created by the project; and, at least 600 of the group shall be residents of the seven - county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categories shall be determined as of the date of the Project's preliminary approval by the City Council (December 14, 1987). However, if the contractor can show that these quotas are not feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specific skills, the contractor may request the City Council for a release from the two residency requirements. The requirements shall continue for the duration of the construction project. (iv) the Contractor shall be an active participant in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. 0 17 (v) Al.1 pro i s i ons of these tax- exempt f i. nan,ce requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the Project. (c) A written opinion, with supporting justifica- tion from a qualified expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application requesting tax exempt mortgage financing to document that: (i) The Project will not adversely increase the vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the City that are existing or have received preliminary City approval over the metropolitan average. There is reasonable assurance that the Project will be able to comply with the federal, county and City low -to- moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. (d) The bond indenture for the Bonds shall require: (i) The Developer to periodically certify to the City and trustee, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. The frequency of certification shall be determined on a case -by -case basis. (ii) The trustee is to inform the City of noncompliance trends with federal low -to- moderate income requirements. (e) As a condition of approving the Project, a Jump-sum fee at Bond closing or an annual fee over the life of the Bond will be required. The City reserves the right to choose the fee option that will be the most beneficial to the City. This choice will be made when the final resolution for the Project and the Bonds is . ...adopted. Factors to- be.taken into account will include, but not be limited to: (i) The s i z e of the Bond JSSUe. Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request. The number of requests. 6 v) Feclera l a rb r k rage cans I(ler. at_ . i ons . (f) The formula for each fee option is as follows: (i) Annual fee: (1) Full_ bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and.one- quarter of one percent of the Bond issue shall be paid at Bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restric- tions. (2) Prepayment of Bonds: The same as the full Bond maturity requirement, except if all of the outstanding Bonds are prepaid prior to final Bond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump -sum fee equal to the present value of the remaining annual fee payments, from the date of prepayment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (ii) Lump -sum fee: At Bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert, acceptable to the City. (f) 200 of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of 500 or less of the metropolitan median income, unless the Developer elects to provide 400 of the Project units complying with the 600 of median income requirement; (g) 75% of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than .1.10 0 of the metropol i tan - med i an income; and (h) 510 of the Project units shall be affordable to households wh ]"_ch have adjusted gross i n -omes of no more than 800 of the metropolitan median income. Adopted by the C i t y Counc i .l . of the C i t y of Maplewood, Minnesota this 14th day of December, 1987. Fh 1 9 STATE OF MTNNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office and that the same is a full,'true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, y d Cit dul called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes related to a resolution granting preliminary PP approval to the Cottages of Maplewood Project. WITNESS my hand as City Clerk this day of December, 1987. City Clerk 8 Zv 5972 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD; MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE PROGRAM THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT This program is for a multifamily rental housing develop- ment located south of Woodlynn Avenue and East of Ariel Street, in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. The Development (as hereinafter described) will be financed by an issue of revenue bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, issued by the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City "). The Development will be undertaken to further the policies and goals stated in the City's Housing Plan, as amended. The Development will consist of the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 48,000 square foot (approxi- mately) multi - family rental housing development of approxi- mately 60 rental units. The Development will be undertaken by The Arkell Development Corporation. Not less than 20 percent Of the dwelling units in the Development will be occupied-or held for occupancy by persons or families whose income does . .not exceed" 50 percent of the median income for the area which includes the City of Maplewood as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Since the Development is located in a "targeted -area" as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.02, Subd. 9, no state law Z ( Attachment 6 limitations on tenant income will apply. However, the City will impose certain limits on the income of tenants and these limits are on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Development will be available for rental to the general public, and will be operated. .only as a rental housing facility for the term of the revenue bonds. The City will issue revenue.bonds to finance the Develo merit in the approximate amount of $2,800,000, The p owner of the Development will be required, pursuant to a revenue agreement, to make payments sufficient to pay when due. the � inci al of premium, if any, and interest on all such p p revenue bonds. The revenue bonds may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available or necessary and are permitted by law to enhance the security for and marketability etabilit of the revenue bonds. Substantially all of the net proceeds of the revenue bonds (the initial principal amount thereof, less amounts deposited in a reasonably re- q aired reserve or paid out as costs issuance of the revenue bonds) will be used to pay the costs of.the Development, including y functional) related and subordinate facilities :. The Development will be operated as a multifamily rental housin g deve ment within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, and as a "residential rental project" within the meaning of Sectio n 103 4 (A) of the Internal Revenue Code. ( b ) ( ) 2 ZZ The owner of the Development will enter into agreements requiring com liance . throughout the term of the revenue bonds g P or for such longer period as may be required by law) with the. requirements of federal and state law and the City income limit policies. Acquisition of the Development will be carried out in accordance with applicable land use.and development restric- tions and construction - of the Development is subject to applicable state and local building codes. The is consistent with the City's Housing Plan under Minnesota Stat- utes, Chapter 462C. The owner of the Development will be required to operate the project in accordance with state and q P local anti - discrimination -laws and ordinances. The City has adequate existing capacity to administer, monitor and supervise the - Development, although the City has reserved the right to contract with other public agencies or private parties for these purposes. p The costs of the Development and the program of financing including specifically the co the Development, g P . sts of the City .,generally P enerall will be aid or reimbursed by the owner of the Development or from the application fee paid to the City by the owner. 3 Z3 e 556X EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: DECEMBER 14,.1987 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meetin g Y of the c it y Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held on the 14th day of December, 1987, at o'clock p.m. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CREATING HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 - AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM RELATING THERETO WHEREAS: A. It has been proposed that the City of Maplewood create Housin District No. 1 - (the "Tax District ") cr g within Development District No. 1 and adopt a tax increment financing P lan and development program with respect thereto under the P rovisions of Minnesota Statutes,. Sections 469.174 through 469.179 and Sections 469.124 through 469.134 (collectively the "Act "); B. The Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be re ared a development program and a. proposed tax P P increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District. � �� Attachment 7 C. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the creation of . the Tax Increment District and the adoption of the proposed development program and t ax increment financing plan relating thereto, including, but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 and Special Intermediate School District No. 916 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the Tax Increment District, a P ro p y of the* proposed review by the City Planning Commission osed P P Development Program for Development District No. 1, and the holding of a public hearing upon p ublished and mailed notice as required by law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City .of Maplewood as follows: 1. Tax Increment District. There is established in the City of Maplewood within Development District No. 1 a tax increment financing district to be known as "Housing District " Housing District No. 1 -3 shall have the initial No. 1 3. g boundaries as indicated in the tax increment p lan relating thereto. 2. Development Pro Tax Increment Finan Plan The development program and the tax increment financing plan are adopted as the development program and tax. increment financing plan for the Tax Increment Financing District, and the City Council makes the following findings: a) Housing District 1 -3 is a housing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 4.69.174 the specific basis for such determination being: Housing District No. 1-3-is being created to assist a housing development to be undertaken by The Arkell. Development Corporation who will be developing a 60 unit senior housing complex and the units will be intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defined in Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended. (b) The P roposed redevelopment in the opinion of the City Council, would . not occur solely through private investment within.the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of.tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The reasons supporting this finding are that: The Arkell Development Corporation has represented to the City that it would not undertake the senior housing development but for the use of tax increment financing. The tax increment financing proceeds and the community development block grants to be received from Ramsey County are necessary to keep the rents affordable to the senior residents of the housing complex. (c) The tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons for supporting this finding are that: (i) The Tax Increment District is properly zoned;. The tax increment financing plan will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan . d The tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of pp Y► Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Tax Increment District by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that: As previously stated the development activities, consisting of land acquisition and /or site improvements, to be financed by tax increment financing are necessary so that additional senior housing development by private enterprise can occur within.Development District No, 1. The City Council has previously stated that providing senior .. housl.ng is a City priority. 5. Public Purpose The development program and the adoption of the tax incre ment f inanci ng - . plan for the Tax Increment District conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a' need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to p employment provide em to ment opportunities to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. 6. Certification The Auditor of Ramsey County is re q nested to certify the original assessed - value of the-Tax Increment District as described in the tax increment financing plan and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original assessed value has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Manager is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the Tax Increment Districts for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. 7, Fi 1 ink . The Ci ty Manager is further author i zed and directed to file a copy of the development program and tax increment financing plan for the Tax Increment District with the Commissioner of Energy and Economic Development. 8. Administration. The administration of D evelop evelo ment District No. 1 is assigned to the City Manager who shall from time to time be granted such powers and..duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.130 and 469.131 as the City Council.may deem appropriate. 9. Notice of Public Hearin 2. The actions of City staff in causing the notice of public hearing to be published in the Maplewood Review are hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted. The motion for the adoption of the resolution - was duly seconded by member upon vote being taken thereon, the following thereof: and the following voted against the same: foregoing and voted in favor r �% Whereupon said resol tit i.on was declared dul passed a adopted. a STATF OF MTNNFS.OTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLE` OOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Manager of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, PO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same i.s a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, Y dul called and held-on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the. establishment of Housing District No. 1 -3 in the City. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of , 19870 City Clerk (SEAL) Cz9� MLI: 11/11/87 MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM for DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 (Zantigo and Maplewood Square) HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 (Maple Ridge Apartments) HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 (Maple Ridge Estates Apartments) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 (Mall.Addition and Main Street Store) HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 (Cottages of Maplewood) for CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA December 14, 1987 This document was drafted by: 570M BRIGGS AND MORGAN 2200 First National Bank Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Attachment 8 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN Based upon the statutory authority described in the Modified Development Program attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City's development objectives as set forth in the Modified Development Program, the City Council has created, established and designated Development District No. 1 pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.1260 The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith: October 28, 1985 The Program for Development District No. 1 was adopted by the City Council. June 23,_1986 The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying the Project Costs. - September 28,.1987 The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by enlargement of-the geographic Project Area and increased Project Costs. December 14, 1987 The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying the Project Costs. The following municipal action was taken with regard to the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within Development District No. 1: Economic Development District No. 1 -1 (Zantigo and Maplewood Square): October 28, 1985 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 - 1 was adopted by the City Council. June 23, 1986 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -1 was modified. Housing District No. 1 - 1 (Maple Ridge Apartments): October 28, 1985 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -1 was adopted by the City Council. 3� June 23,1986 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -1 was modified. Housing District No. 1 -2 (Maple Ridge Estates Apartments) : October 28, 1985 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -2 was adopted by the City _ Council. June 23, 1986 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -2 was modified. Economic Development District No. 1 -2 (Mall Addition and Main Street Store): September 28, 1987 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1 -2 was adopted by the City Council. Housing District No. 1 -3 (Cottages of Maplewood): December 14, 198 7: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3 was adopted by the City Council. 2 32 SECTION I DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0, 1 1.1. Definitions The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan, have the meanings herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires: " City " means the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. The City has a Statutory City -Plan A form of government. " Comprehensive Plan means the City's Comprehensive Plan submitted to the Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 473.173, which contains the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. " Council " means the City Council of the City, also referred to as the governing body. (See "Governing Body" below.) "Count " means the County of Ramsey, Minnesota. " Development District Act of Minnesota Statutes, Sections amended and supplemented* means the statutory provisions 469.124 through 469.134, as " Development District means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is created and established hereto pursuant to and in accordance with the Development District Act, and is geographically described in Exhibit A. " Development Program means this Development Program for Development District No. 1, initially adopted by the Council on October 28, 1985 and modified on June 23, 1986, September 28, 1987 and December 14, 1987. As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 3, a development program is a statement of objectives of the City for improvement of a development district which contains a complete statement as to the public facilities to be constructed within the district, the open space to be created, the environmental controls to be 3 33 applied, the proposed reuse of private property and the proposed.operations of the district after the capital improvements within the district have been completed. " Economic Development District_ means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of any project, or - - portions of a project, not meeting the requirements found in the definition of redevelopment district or housing district, but which the City finds to be in the public interest because: (a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state; or (b) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or (c) _It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the _ municipality. " Governing Body means the duly elected City Council as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 8. " Housing District means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 11. " Municipal Industrial Development Act means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended. " Municipality " means any city, however organized as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 2. " State " means the State of Minnesota. " Tax Increment Bonds means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds issued and to be issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with Development District No. 1 as stated in the Development Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1.. The term "Tax Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds. " Tax Increment Financing District means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in Development District No. 1. " Tax Increment Financing Act means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended. " Tax Increment Financing Plan means the respective Tax Increment Financing Plan for each Tax Increment Financing District located within the Development District. 1.2. Statement of Public Purpose The Council (the "Council ") in and for the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") has determined that there is a need for housing, development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City to provide employment opportunities, to enhance development opportunities for the private sector, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the City, the County of Ramsey and the State of Minnesota. It is found that there are certain parcels of property within the Development District which are potentially more useful, productive and valuable than is being realized under existing conditions, is less productive because of the lack of proper utilization, and, therefore, are not contributing to the tax base of the City to their full potential. In addition, it is hereby found that there is a need for public improvements to encourage development. Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Development District of the City to provide impetus for private development, to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City. The Council has also determined that the proposed developments would not occur solely through private investment in* the forseeable future; that the tax increment financing plans proposed herein are consistent with the Development Program; and that the tax increment financing plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole,.for the development or 5 redevelopment of the Development District by private enterprise. The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives. 1.3. Statutory Authority THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACT. The Development District Act, authorizes the City, upon certain public purpose findings by the Council, to establish and designate development districts within the City and to establish, develop and administer development programs in regard thereto, all for the purpose of creating funding for the financing of necessary activities and improvements within the City. In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District Act, the Council hereby establishes Development District No. 1, as described in Exhibit A, for the purposes of enhancing the environment in which existing businesses are located, thus helping to secure their continued existence and potential additional development within the City, and promoting new and on -going development in Development District No. 1, both of which will provide employment opportunities,, improve the tax base of the City and contribute positively to the economy.of the State. THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ACT, The Tax Increment Financing Act, provides the procedure for the establishment of tax increment districts for the use of tax increment financing authorized by the Development District Act for the funding of qualified public activities and improvements. Within the Development District, the City plans to establish three housing districts as the types of tax increment financing district described in Section 469.174, Subd. 11 for Housing District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -2 and Housing District No. 1 -3 and plans to establish two economic development districts as the types of tax increment financing district described in Section 469.174, Subd. 12 for Economic Development District No. 1 -1 and Economic Development District No. 1 -2. 1.4 Statement of Need The Development District is established by the City of Maplewood for the purpose of promoting the redevelopment of existing commercial areas and 6 the development of new business opportunities within the community. The City has found that the area within the Development District has not realized its greatest development potential due to a variety of factors. Included in the development barriers identified by the City are:. inadequate public improvements, improper land use and utilization, and - lack of investment. The City has found that the creation of the Development District and the utilization of tax increment financing is needed to remove these barriers and to promote development of the community. 1.5 Statement of Objectives The Council determines that it is necessary, desireable and in the public interest to establish the Development District in the City, pursuant to the authority of the Development District Act. The Council finds that the creation of the Development District is necessary to give the City the ability to meet certain public purpose objectives that would not be otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without intervention by the City in the normal development process. The City intends to satisfy the following objectives through the implementation of the Development Program. (a) To provide safe, decent, sanitary housing for all residents of the city and in particular low and moderate income residents. (b) To provide an adequate housing supply for all residents at a cost they can afford. (c) To provide housing choices for low and moderate income residents who find housing opportunities are not available to them because of economic conditions. (d) To provide project activities which will assist in making possible the construction of a planned apartment for low and moderate income residents, as well, as improving health, welfare and convenience of citizens residing in the Development District. (e) Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in the Development District, necessary for the 7 �7 orderly and beneficial development of the Development District and adjacent areas of the City. (f) Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City. (g) Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the City. (h) Secure the increase of property subject to taxation by the City, Independent School Districts Nos. 622 and 624, Ramsey County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. (i) Promote the concentration of new desirable residential, commercial, office, restaurant, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City. (j) Encourage local business expansion, improvement and development, whenever possible. (k) Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District through quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings. 8 C36) (1) Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment of existing areas and structures which are compatible with the Development Program. 1.6 Boundaries of Development District The area within the Development District is set forth in Exhibit A. 1.7 Development Activities Development activities within the Development District must be financially easible marketable and be compatible patible with long -range development strategies of the City. The following recommendations represent the options that satisfy community development objectives for the Development District while taking advantage of opportunities which are currently available. The City will perform all project activities pursuant to the statute and in doing so, anticipates that the following may, but are not required to be undertaken: (a) The making of studies, planning, and informal activities relating to the Development Program. (b) The implementation and adminis- tration of the Development Program. (c) The construction or reconstruction of streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other public improvements including but not limited to: (i) the water and sewer Southlawn Drive County Road D; construction of improvements on from Beam Avenue street, to (ii) the construction of street, water and sewer improvements on McKnight Road from Highway 36 to Conway Avenue; (iii) the construction of a water tower on Stillwater Road east of Sterling; (iv) the construction of water main on Hudson place; 9 a (v) the installation of traffic lights at Hazelwood Avenue and Southlawn Avenue on Beam Avenue. (vi) acquisition of land and - - improvement of Hazelwood Park located at County Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue; (vii) improvement of Playcrest - Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight Road; (viii) acquisition and expansion of Harvest Park located at Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36; (ix) the construction of water, street, sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements within an area North of Beam Avenue, South of the Northern City limit, East of Highway 61 and West of White Bear Avenue; (x) acquisition of the abandoned Burlington Northern railroad right of way running from Larpenteur Street to Highway 694; (xi) acquisition of the land that the Cottages of Maplewood will be developed on and the payment of certain site improvements for the Cottages of Maplewood project. (d) The acquisition of property consistent with the objectives of the Development Program. (e) The preparation of property for use including demolition of structures, clearance.of sites, placement of fill, and installation of utilities. (f) The resale of property to .0 developers. 10 �c� (g) The provision of relocation assistance to businesses and homeowners as may be required by this Development Program. (h) The issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance public costs of the Development Program or to evidence the City's obligation to reimburse developers for all or part of the public costs of the Development Program incurred or to be incurred by it pursuant to a Development Agreement. (i) The use of tax increments derived from a Tax Increment Financing District within the Development District to pay debt service on Tax Increment Bonds or otherwise pay the public cost of the Development Program. 1.8 Payment of Public Cost It is anticipated that the public cost of the Development Program will be paid primarily from the tax increments to be derived from the Development District, either directly or indirectly by payment of project eligible expenses, by reimbursement of Developers for items of public paid directly by developers, or by some combination of these methods. The City reserves the right to utilize special assessments, general property taxes, utility revenues, and other sources of revenue which the City may apply to pay the public cost. 1.9. Environmental Controls The proposed Tax Increment Financing Districts within the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental standards. 1.10 Park and Open Space to be Created Park and open space within the Development District No. 1 will be created in accordance with the zoning and platting ordinances of the City. The City may undertake the following park improvements: (a) the acquisition of land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at County Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue; 11 E , if LP) (b) the improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight Road. (c) the acquisition and expansion of Harvest Park located at Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36. 1.11. Proposed Reuse of Property The Development Program does not contemplate the acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and /or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It shall be the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a part. 1.12. Administration and Maintenance of Development District 'Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Manager who shall serve as administrator of the Development District. The administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Section 469.131 of the Development District Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Council. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the above - mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Council. 1.13. Rehabilitation Owners of properties within the Development District will be encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of properties who purchase property within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties as condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from federal, state or local sources. 12 -q DZ 1.14. Relocation No person will be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of the Development Program. The City accepts its responsibility for providing for relocation pursuant to Section 469.133 of the Development District Act. 1.15. Amendments The City reserves the right to alter and amend the Development Program and the tax increment financing plans, subject to the provisions of state law - regulating such action. The City specifically reserves the right to change the size of the Development District and the Tax Increment Financing Districts, the public cost of the Development Program and the amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such cost by followi'n.g the P rocedures specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4. 13 ( 43, SECTION II TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 HOUSING DISTRICT-NO, 1- 2 - - [Adopted October 28, 19851 [Modified June 23, 19861 2.1 Statement of Objectives - See Section I, Subsection 1.5, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 2.2 Development Program See Section I, Subsection 1.3, Development Program for Development District No. 1. _ 2.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in the Tax Increment District are described in Exhibit B. HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 - 1 Housing District No. 1 -1 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in Housing District No. 1 -1 are described in Exhibit C. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 Housing District No. 1 -2 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in Housing District No. 1 -2 are described in Exhibit D. 2.4 Parcels to be Acquired At this time the City does not intend to acquire and reconvey any parcels to specific developers of property within 14 q� the City. The City intends to acquire rights of way in connection with the construction of certain public improvements within the Development District. The City intends to acquire two parcels of land if it undertakes the expansion of Hazelwood Park. These parcels are described as follows: - The Fee Owners of the north parcel are Bruce M. Mogren, Eugene F. Arndt, et al. Legal description: That part of the west 408.8 feet of the E+ of the SE -1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey Co., Minn. lying North of the South 1,243-00 feet of said E+ of the SE -1/4 and South of the North 912.00 feet of said E+ of.SE -1/4, according to the U.S. Govt. Survey thereof. Size: 4.11 acres. Fee Owners of the south property are Lawrence S. Dotte and Donald A. Kainz, Trustees of the profit sharing trust of the Donlar Corp. and Contract Purchaser Eugene F. Arndt. Legal description: The North 400 feet of the South 1,243 feet of the West 408 feet of the SE -1/4, of the SE -1/4, Section 3, Township 29, Range 22 and The North 200 feet of the South 1,043 feet of the East 510 feet of the West 558 feet of the SW -1/4 of the SE -1/4, of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, except the North 30 feet of the East 100 feet of the west 408 feet thereof, all in Ramsey Co., Minn. Size: 4.06 acres. 2.5 Development Activity in Development District No. 1 for which Contracts Have Been Signed (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road is being developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc. on County. Road D, West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor is William Kranz Construction and the cost of the project is $260,000. 15 y� (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center is being developed by Curt Johnson and Joe Weis - Weis Builders, Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Weis Builders and the cost of the project is $2,318,383. (c) Maple Ridge Apartments is being developed by Podawiltz Development Company on County Road D, west of _ White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Avon Lumber Company, Inc. and the cost of the project is $2,800,000. (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments is being developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor is Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project is $3,999,000. 2.6 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within Development District No. 1. (a) the construction of Century Ridge Apartments on Century Avenue south of Battle Creek; (b) the construction of Hazel Ridge Apartments at the intersection of Hazelwood Avenue and County Road C; (c) the construction of Beaver Creek Apartments at the intersection of Ferndale and Ivy Street; (d) an expansion of Maplewood Mall; (e) the rehabilitation and renovation of Keller Lake Shopping Center. It is anticipated that the above projects will be started within one year. 2.7 Estimated Cost of Project Costs and Supportive Data The estimated costs of certain of the public improvements and park improvements set forth in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed by tax increments to be derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -1 Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 within Development District No. 1 are $2,188,870. 16 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS & PARK IMPROVEMENTS [Section 1.7(c)(i) through (viii)] LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY BOND DISCOUNT INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST LESS INTEREST AND INCOME DURING CAPITALIZED INTEREST PERIOD EARNED AT 60 TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD $2,188,870.00 $ 33,644.35 $ 47,310900 $ 236,511.79 ($ 16,336914) $2,490,000.00 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ITEM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BASIS FOR ESTIMATE Estimates by City Staff Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance, bond issuance costs, planning provided by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf- MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet .scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 17 0 4-7 7 2.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the amount of $2,490,000 will be incurred with respect to this portion of Development District No, 1. 2.9 Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to pay the costs associated with Development District No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds, state -aid funds, special assessments and park funds. 2.10 Original Assessed Value and Fiscal Disparities ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -10 The original assessed value of all taxable property in Economic Development District No. 1 -1 as most recently _ certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1985 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1985, for taxes payable in 1986 is estimated to be $278,560. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 1, requires that the original assessed value in economic development districts be adjusted on an annual basis. -The rate of adjustment is equal to the average percentage increase in the assessed value of all property in the Economic Development District No. 1 -1 during the five years prior to certification. The rate of adjustment for the District is approximately 1.0840. The City hereby elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause (b). HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 The original assessed value of all taxable property in Housing District No. 1 -1 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1984 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1985, for taxes payable in 1985 is estimated to be $3,160. 18 HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -2 The original assessed value of all taxable property in the Housing District No. 1 -2 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1985 with respect to the Assessed Value of such property as of January 2, 1985, for taxes payable in 1986 is estimated to be $37,440. 2.11 Estimated Captured Assessed Value Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City of Maplewood. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation iri Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 above the original assessed _ value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the original assessed value was certified, the amount the original assessed value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court - ordered abatements* ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Economic Development District Noe 1 -1 the City estimates the assessed value of the Property within Economic Development District No. 1--1 to be $1,822,566. 19 C,/ The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $1,233,838.73° This amount will be captured for up to 8 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The city requests 72.83390 of the available increase in assessed value from Economic Development District No. 1 -1 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan (the balance of the increase being used to pay the fiscal disparaties contribution of Economic Development Distruct No. 1 -1.). HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -1 Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Housing District No. 1 -1 the City estimates the assessed value of the property within Housing District No. 1 -1 to be $794,750. The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $791,590. This amount will be captured for up to 25 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The City requests 1000 of the available increase in assessed value from Housing District No. 1 -1 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan. HOUSING DISTRICT N0, 1 -2 Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Housing District No. 1 -2 the City estimates the assessed value of the property within Housing District No. 1 -2 to be $1,300,500. The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $1,263,060. This amount will be captured for up to 25 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The City requests 1000 of the available increase in assessed value from Housing District No. 1 -2 for - repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 2.12 Type of Tax Increment Financing District ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1 Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act, the City finds that Economic Development District No. 1 -1 qualifies as an "economic development district 20 Ste' 1. Economic Development District No. 1 -1 does not meet the requirements to qualify as either a housing or a redevelopment district. 2. The creation of Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is in the public interest because it will preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and it will result in increased employment within the City. HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -1: and HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2: Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Act, the City finds that Housing District No. 1-1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 each qualify as a "housing district" because a portion of each project is intended for occupancy, in part, by persons of low and moderate income as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. 2.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -1: The Act allows "economic development districts" to remain in existence for a. period of 8 years from the receipt of the first tax increment or 10 years from the approval of the tax increment financing plan, whichever is less. Based on these limitations it is anticipated that Economic Development District No. 1 -1 will remain in effect until eight years from the receipt of the first tax increment. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -1: and HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -2: The Act allows "housing districts" to remain existence for a period of 25 years from the receipt of first tax increment. Based on this limitation it is anticipated that Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing No. 1 -2 will remain in effect until June, 2012. in the District SI 2.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financing ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 The estimated impact of Economic Development District No. 1 -1 on the other taxing jurisdictions within - - Economic Development District No. 1 -1 is set forth on Table I. HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 The estimated impact of Housing District No. 1 -1 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Housing District No. 1 -1 is set forth on Table II. HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -2 The estimated impact of Housing District No. 1 -2 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Housing District No. 1 -2 _ is set forth on Table III. 2.15 Cash Flow Analysis See Table IV. 22 ECONIMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. -1 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPAC ON TAX BASE o � r W DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED COUNTY OF RAMSEY 31.867. 50 CITY OF Map lewood 17.747 32 OTHER (1' 6.310 11 SCHOOL DISTRICT #622 59.453 108 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include ORIGINAL DISTRICT AS FUTURE DISTRICT AS ASSESSED PERCENT OF ASSESSED PERCENT OF JURISDICTION TAX BASE VALUE JURISDICTION VALUE JURISDICTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3 s 278 90087% 1 90569% CITY OF M a p lewood p 263 278 .1059% 1 .6926% SCHOOL DISTRICT #622 376 278 .0740% 1,822 .4842% o � r W DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED COUNTY OF RAMSEY 31.867. 50 CITY OF Map lewood 17.747 32 OTHER (1' 6.310 11 SCHOOL DISTRICT #622 59.453 108 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include HOUSING DISTRICT NO, 1 -1 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX BASE (�V\\ 0 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED COUNTY of RAMSEY 31.867 25 CITY OF Maplewood 17.747 149104 OTHER ( 1) ' 6.310 59015 SCHOOL' DISTRICT # 624 59.453 47 ob r H 1. other taxing jurisd include : DISTRICT AS ORIGINAL DISTRICT AS FUTURE ASSESSED PERCENT OF ASSESSED PERCENT OF JURIS DICTION TAX BASE VALUE JURISDICTION VALUE JURISDICTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3 3,160 40001% 794 .0247% CITY OF M APLEWOOD 263 3 .0012% 794 .3020% SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 227 160 3 , .0014% 794 .3490% (�V\\ 0 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON MILL RATES POTENTIAL JURISDICTION CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES GENERATED COUNTY of RAMSEY 31.867 25 CITY OF Maplewood 17.747 149104 OTHER ( 1) ' 6.310 59015 SCHOOL' DISTRICT # 624 59.453 47 ob r H 1. other taxing jurisd include : HOUSING DISTRICT NO* 1 -2 DEVELOPMENT DISTRI IMPACT ON TAX.B Q� POTENTIAL .If IRT CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES . GENERATED F RAMSEY 31.867 41,443 COUNTY O . p CITY OF M 17.747 239080 OTHER (1) 6.310 89206 SCHOOL DISTRICT STRICT # 622 59.453 77 ' e 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: . ab r H H H ORIGINAL DISTRICT AS FU U10 1 - 1 no ASSL•eSSED PERCENT OF ASSESSED PERCENT OF JURISDICTION TAX BASE VALUE JURISDICTION VALUE JURISDICTION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3 220 409 041 s , s 37,440 .0012% 1 .0404% CITY OF Maplewood 263 146 550 s 37 .0142% 1 .4942% SCHOOL DISTRICT # 622 376 434 995 37.440 00099% 1 .3455% Q� POTENTIAL .If IRT CURRENT MILL RATE TAXES . GENERATED F RAMSEY 31.867 41,443 COUNTY O . p CITY OF M 17.747 239080 OTHER (1) 6.310 89206 SCHOOL DISTRICT STRICT # 622 59.453 77 ' e 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include: . ab r H H H e a city of Ma a l ewo -oa, M i nne a Casn Flaw Anaivsls .io��s'ng 1 - 2 Economic 1 Total Caaitilized Pri ncipal C4uoor� Interest Total Dent Seance Cumulative 8i:ance Coverage Factor • Lat Kevenue Revenue n m ousi ng Revenue I nteres t 4 _ . Jr lose s 7��• 162,885M 162, 885.88 162 885. N 1. - - ��3.. 54 124.88 9 89 258.21 13, 626.79 ley e1e N 588 ®% 162, 885.80 158, 26x.88 162, 885.08 343, 268.00 se ll 17, 784.18 185% -- ; yby 9 l • 56 � � id � .956.6y :45 9x.69 � '42 3, 5..3.53 121 36e, 964.78 358.456. '4 , . 190 808.80 . 5,25a% 148.647.58 641.50 338 , 647.,50 5 31 5:3.53 3 7, 116% �� ;; 91 4 1�. 56 , �� 1 � 5 , 9C 6. b• 1 B - X05. 1 5 355 , 737.00 208, 800.9 5.500% 6. RU 138, 168.88 126, 360. a0 338,160.08 336.369, 01 55, @98.53 71,519-87 :85% 05% 5% - 1116 q. , � 7 4.56 145.956.69 4 4 , C ,' 89 .. J, .s58 . . 352 78934 349.594.87 210, 808. 226, 006.00 6.200% 113, 240.08 333, 240.86 87.873.94 105% . - . 3 • - . ,, 4'4..16 _ 9, a l �. 6 1 45, 5.11,. 69 a 45,156.69 112, 16�. 108, 699.15 3+6.1 aa. 4a _ 238, 008.00 SAW 9y, 0�. 6a 329,168. � N4 1 85% 186% :1 9 ., y 14.56 ,, �� . 14, 9_:.69 4 104.9 4. ,.3 340,35978 7 240, 600, 00 155, 000, as 6, M4 7.0?0% 83.660.08 78,195-09 323, 666. M 225,195. N 123, 6b0. :2 135 : a5% .� -� — � :, � • , :�; �•, - 1 X14. �6 V �L e�.I, q J�. 69 �- 237 43:.25 a 237 431.25 165, ON- e•0 7.263% 58 223, 8389 CI 149, 497.62 106% ; 9'..414 .56 91, 414 e��, 9�a. E9 14_ 9 237 431.25 9 i da, 8061 as 7.400% 46, 230.86 226, 230.80 160 105% 1 665% . �8 . 6 e 1:, 474. _�6 ,y 1 956.69 237 431, 25 ' 195, 000. a8 a0 79 6@8% 7.180% 32,160.80 lE 1 665.00 227,16x.80 226,665. ti8 171, 970.12 181,736. 37 .105% 9; , 4 r 4. v6 145, 950.63 � c37, 4,x1. 231, 431. ^c5 X18 8889 111, 0x0.08 7.880% � 88 4, 2.0. 114 29q.6® , 384 877.62 � 298% ?00: 9 ► y7a. 56 145, 95b. 69 -r-r ------r-- a '• ' Q e &1c23,702-6 ------r.-w -...r- 7 36. "a l 1 # 65 ,4 --- --------- 858,753, 15 - -------�0�� 3 6 979,893,33 236 511.79 2 498a 000.80 1, 421, 527.56 3 91 i, 527.58 364, 871.62 rN� �.���e��• ____ vOS�M��s�MO OO�O��..�M.��� 0��� �M.I.N�O O��Nr��M�� �� �� .t 1. � � •w�ww��r �.wwr�ww • :.:�.i� :Gre of the cove `actor G not inc .ude .� -i ,tenet ea rned on ne oa,. arnce. dfeparea Mi i l Soroecer Fina 6/13/85 2.16 Use of Tax Increment The City hereby determines that it will use 10.0% of the captured assessed value of taxable property located in Economic Development District No. 1 - 1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 and 100% of the tax increments to be derived from the Economic Development District No. 1 -1. The tax increments derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 shall be used for the following activities: 1. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds. 2. To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of Development District No. 1. 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 4620, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469, or both. 5. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 6. To finance other purposes as may be allowed by the Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Act. 2.17 Prior Planned Improvements The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties wthin Economic Development District No, 1 -1 Housing District No. 1 -1 and.Housing District No. 1 -2 for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval'of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor 23 �7 shall increase the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 or Housing District No. 1 -2, as the case may be, by the assessed value of the improvements for which the building permit was issued, excluding the assessed value of improvements for which a building permit was issued during the three (3) month period immediately preceding said approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan as certified by the assessor. 2.18 Limitation on Qualification of Tax Increment Development on a parcel located within the Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four (4) years of the date of certification of the original assessed value. For the purposes of this - section the term "development" shall mean including demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to the parcel. Development shall not include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1, or Housing District No. 1 -2, as the case may be. If the City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences development, the City shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the affected Tax Increment Financing District. 2.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be 24 acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a Tax Increment Financing District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the. date of certification of the original assessed value by the county auditor. Economic Development District No. 1 - 1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 districts may therefore be expanded until 1990.. 2.20 Limitation on Administrative Expenses In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.178. Administrative expenses includes amounts paid for provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. 2.21 Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of.certification by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public impr°ovemewnts within the district..." The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by 1988 or the County Auditor may dissolve the applicable Tax Increment Financing District. 25 s� 2.22 Limitation on of Property in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd . 6 , " if , of ter four years f rom the date of certif ication of the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not installation of utility _ service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or - renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. 2.23 Excess Tax Increments. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61 Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount toe 10 prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or 26 �G 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their mill rate. In addition, the City may choose to modify the financing plan as described in Part II, 2.18, in order to provide further public improvements within the development district. 2.24 Administration of Tax Increment Financing Districts Administration of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -2 and Housing District No. 1 -2 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager. The tax increment received as a result of incre.ases in the assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -1, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No, 1 -2 will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the Tax Increment Finance Plan. 2.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or before July 1, an annual financial report for all Tax Increment Financing Districts. The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report shall as nearly as possible: 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing District; 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and financial reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, including a single Tax Increment Financing District that is part of a multidistrict project or that is funded in part or whole through the use of a development account funded with tax increments from other Tax Increment Financing Districts or with other public money; and 27 �r 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the report shall contain the following information. 1. The original assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of any captured assessed value shared with other tax districts; 3. The outstanding principal amount of bonds issued or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the duration of the Tax Increment Financing District, the amount budgeted - under the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories:' A. Acquisition of land and buildings through condemnation or purchase; B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and D. Administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the City and the price paid by the developer; 6. The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under clause (3), that were issued - on behalf of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. 28 GDZ- SECTION III TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 1 -2 [Adopted September 28, 19871 - 3.1 Statement of Objectives See Section I. Subsection 1.5 Development Program for Development District No. 1. 3.2 Development Program See Section I, Subsection 1.3, Development Program for Development District.No, 1. 3.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financ DiRtrint. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 Economic Development District No.o 1 -2 is made up of certain arcels located within Development District No. 1. P The specific parcels contained in the Tax I ncrement District are described in Exhibit E. 3.4 Parcels to be Acquired In connection with Economic Development District No. 1 -2 the City does not intend to acquire and reconvey any parcels to specific developers of property within the City. The City intends. to acquire rights of way in connection with the construction of certain public improvements within the Development District. 3.5 Development Activity in Development District N o. 1 for which Contracts Have Been Signed (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road is being developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc. on County Road D, West of White Bear Avenueo The contractor i is William Kranz Construction and the cost of the project s $260,000. (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center is being developed by Curt Johnson and Joe Weis - Weis Builders, 29 Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Weis Builders and the cost of the project is $2,318,383. (c) Maple Ridge Apartments is being developed by Podawiltz Development Company on County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor is Avon Lumber Company, Inc. and the cost of the project is $2,800,000. _ (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments is being developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor is Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project is $3,999,000. .(e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being . developed by CPI. The contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000. (f) A Main Street Store at Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated Department Stores. The contractor is Sheehy Construction and the cost of the project is $2,000,000. 3.6 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within Development District No. 1 (a) The expansion of St. John's Northeast Hospital on Beam Avenue; (b) It is expected that additional development may occur in Development District No. 1 in the future. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at this time. 3.7 Estimated Cost of Project Costs and Supportive Data The estimated costs of certain of the public improvements set forth in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed by tax increments to be derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -2 (together with any available tax increments from Economic Development District No, 1 - 1, Housing District No. 1- 1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 within Development District No. 1) are $845,000. 30 G� PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS [Section 1.7(c)(ix) and (x)] $ 689,000 LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY $ 33,450 BOND DISCOUNT $ 16,550 INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST $ 106,000 TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD $ 845 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRA ITEM BASIS FOR ESTIMATE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Estimates by City Staff PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance,* bond issuance costs, planning provided by'Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf - MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 31 G� 3.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the amount of $845,000 will be incurred with respect to this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1. 3.9 Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to pay the costs associated with this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds and special assessments. 3.10 Original Assessed Value and Fiscal Disparities ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2: The original assessed value of all taxable property in Economic Development District No. 1 -2 as most recently - certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1986 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1986, for taxes payable in 1987 is estimated to be $151,113. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 1, requires that the original assessed value in economic development districts be adjusted to the average percentage increase in the assessed value of all property in the Economic Development District No. 1 -1 during the five years prior to certification. The rate of adjustment for the District is approximately 2.500. The City hereby elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause (b ) . 3.11 Estimated Captured Assessed Value Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of Economic-Development District No. 1 -2 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City of Maplewood. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -2 above the original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in Economic Development District No. 1 -2 declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. 32 66 The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the original assessed value was certified, the amount the original assessed value has increased or decreased as a result of 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court - ordered abatements. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICY NO. 1 - 2 Upon completion of the development expected to within Economic Development District No. 1 - 2 the City estimates the assessed value of the Property within Economic _ Development District No. 1 -2 to be $1,903,363. The captured assessed value upon completion is expected to annually approximate $1,752,250. This amount will be captured for up to 8 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The city requests 700 of the available increase in assessed value from Economic Development District No. 1 -2 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan (the balance of the increase being used to pay the fiscal disparaties contribution of Economic Development District No. 1 -2). 3.12 Type of Tax Increment Financing District ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act, the City finds that Economic Development District No. 1 -2 qualifies as an "economic development district ": 1. Economic District No. 1 -2 does not meet the requirements to qualify as either a housing or a redevelopment district. 2. The creation of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is in the public interest because it will preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and it will result in increased employment within the City. 33 �7 3.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2: The Act allows "economic development districts" to remain in existence for a period of 8 years from the receipt of the first tax increment or 10 years from the approval of the tax increment financing plan, whichever is less. Based on these limitations it is anticipated that Economic Development District No. 1 -2 will remain in effect until eight years from the receipt of the first tax increment. - 3.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financing HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 The estimated impact of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Economic Development District No. 1 -2 is set forth on Table V. _ 3.15 Cash Flow Analysis See Table VI. G9 TABLE V ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IMPACT ON TAX BASE: Jur isdiction County of Ramsey City of Maplewood School District No. 622 F(_nM nF.VF.T.nP DT99P I ON MILL RATES: Jurisdiction County of Ramsey City of . Maplewood Other (1) School District No. 622 Current Mill Rate 32.225 18.387 6.843 59.110 61,336 34,997 13,025 112,508 l Other taxing jurisdictions include: Metro Council, Regional Transit Commission, Mosquito Control District, County Library District and Metro Watershed Area Potential Taxes Generated District as Percent of Jurisdiction .0580% .6929% .6400% Original District as Future Assessed Percent of Assessed Tax Base Value Jurisdiction Value 3,283,594,890 151,113 .0046% 1 274,691,365 151,113 .0550% 1,903,363 297,420,326 151 .0508% 1,903,363 F(_nM nF.VF.T.nP DT99P I ON MILL RATES: Jurisdiction County of Ramsey City of . Maplewood Other (1) School District No. 622 Current Mill Rate 32.225 18.387 6.843 59.110 61,336 34,997 13,025 112,508 l Other taxing jurisdictions include: Metro Council, Regional Transit Commission, Mosquito Control District, County Library District and Metro Watershed Area Potential Taxes Generated District as Percent of Jurisdiction .0580% .6929% .6400% TAX l NCREMLN T CASH N LUW : iUl"ImAky KLpuR * TABLE VI CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MAIN STREET STORE PROJECT 1------------ - - - - -- REVENUES ------------ - - - - -1 I ----- - - - - -- EXPIENSES ----- - - -r -- I ' YEAR END LOWEST TAX BOND INVESTMENT PROJECT DEBT ANNUAL CUM. CUM. YEAR wr -wwr- INCREMENT - r- wwr - --- PROCEEDS INCOME -- .ter -- - -r- wry.--------------------------------------------- OTHER COSTS OTHER ---------------r------------ SERVICE BALANCE ------------- BALANCE BALANCE r--- -- - -- -r 1988 0 405, 000 U 0 329,250 25. 9 000 .14, 204 36,546 36,546 36, 5 46 1989 0 0 0 0 0 24 (24, 350) 12, 1 1990 71 0 0 0 0 24,350 46, SSO 599 076 2 1 1991 70 , 9 896 0 0 0 0 63, 7 66,672 6, Sol 1998 70 0 0 0 0 66. (3U, 73:2) 35 101 547 1993 70 U �� 0 0 0 63, 6 42. 16,333 333 1994 69 0 0 0 0 0 65,735 4 47,169 19, 351 1995 69 9 562 0 0 0 4) 62. 6. 54, 2 987 1996 69 9 228 0 cl 0 0 0 64, 505 4 890 59, u53 28, 339 1997 68 0 to 65, 880 3 62-' , 234 29 1998 0 U 0 0 0 0 61,980 (27,533)' 34, 701 34, 701 0 560,496 405,000 0 0 329,250 25 1 000 00 576, 545 TAX INCREMENT ASSUMP I lUt\:3-* bUjyljyjkHy HE I CITY ®E MAPLEWOOD so MINNESOTA . MAIN STREET S M RE PROJECT ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF ASSESSED VALUE BASE = 2.50 TOTAL D. 00 0 ASSESSED VALUE ($000) X TAX AVERAGE LEVY COLT. MILL INCRMT INVEST, YEAR YEAR TOTAL BASE RATE ---------- AVAIL, RATE -------- 1987 1988 135 135 1190210 70m00 00 000 1988 1989 138 138 119.210 70.00 0000 1989 1990 99► 141 1190210 70, 00 00 000 1990 1991 995 145 119V210 70* 0 osoof) 1991 1992 995 149 1190210 70w 0 . 0 010000 1992 1993 995 153 119-4210 70oOO 0' co 1993 1994 995 157 119w210 70w00 01000 .1994 1995 995 161 119,v210 70.00 010000 1995 1996 995 165 119m210 70,00 On 000 1998 1997 995 169 1190210 70noO 0 0000 ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF ASSESSED VALUE BASE = 2.50 TOTAL D. 00 0 I lNGREMENT 8UND ISSUE SUMMARY REPURf CITY ®F MAPLEWOOD.-MINNESOTA MAIN STREET STORE PROJECT BONDS -------------- I 405, INTEREST START DATE FIRST INTEREST DATE BOND YEARS AVERAGE LIFE AVERAGE COUPON 171. 576 Jan-88 Au 2 6.886 YRS. 6,151 % PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT SERVICE YEAR PAYMENTS WAND r.� am" (%) PAYMENTS & INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO 1988 0 5w25th 14,204 14, Cap Int 1989 0 59250 24,350 24 Cap Int 1990 0 5m250 24, 24,350 Cap Int 1991 40,000 5,25o 23 63,300 112-53 1992 45, 5. 500 21, 66,013 107.40 1993 45. 5,70o 18,493 63, 111,13 1994 50,000 5,900 15, 65, 73 5 106,84 1995 50 6. l00 12,735 62,735 111,41 1996 55,000 6. 200 9, 64, 505 107.84 1997 60,000 6,s400 5, 65,880 105.08 1998 60, 68, 600 1. 980 61.v 980 111,16 405, INTEREST START DATE FIRST INTEREST DATE BOND YEARS AVERAGE LIFE AVERAGE COUPON 171. 576 Jan-88 Au 2 6.886 YRS. 6,151 % 594 [ =____,_ _.____:______.- _...___=- .:�__�_ 359-p 750 25, 0010 6281 I. r� ' TABLE VI CITY OF MAPLEWOOD n MINNESOTA TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW '.;UMMARY REPORT MA]PLEWOOD MALL ADDITION PROJECT I _______.___._.____ -- REVENUES ------------------ I I ----- - - - - -- EXPENSES -------- YEAR TAX INCREMENT BOND INVESTMENT PR PROCEEDS I NC INCOME OTHER PROJECT YEAR END CUM. LOWEST CUM. -- ------------ - - - - -- •- - - -- - - -- ----•-----------_------------_------------------- COSTS OTHER •---- _-- SE. CE - - - -R_ I ---- BALANCE - - -- BALANCE BALANCE 1988 1989 0 U 440. 000 � t j D to 3`,9, 7SV �:5 ��t) � U 15, 4.._ ,; 3�, 796 - ?9', 7'96 - - -- 39, 796 1990 749426 u �� n �� 0 26 49� ( 6, 49;?) 13, 304 13 1991 749410 D t.� U to G 26,492 47. 619238 SA 1992 749360 ra D tj 70,311 4 65 337 99 1993 74,326 to to 0 V 67, 893 (3u, 713) 34 624 � - . 8. � 7:: 1994 74 u - c) V tj 70, 231 4 :� 11 �. 38, 736 ' 10 1995 74 9 2 4 2 D c j t.) U u ' 331 6 972 45,708 16,496 1996 74 �� 0 o 69 , 178 _ 5 5U, 791 19 ' -- `20 19'37 74 , 160 tj t.) t C � I 0 , 64c:) 3, 6 •-• t. )._, -. 54,3 2 1 9 662 1998 0 0 t_) 0 t -� % 1, 7i3c 2 56, 894 22,124 2, 31 lU (35- 21 21, 664 r 594 [ =____,_ _.____:______.- _...___=- .:�__�_ 359-p 750 25, 0010 6281 I. r� I TAX INCREMENT BOND .ISSUE SUMMARY REPORT • ,CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA MAPLEWOOD MALL ADDITION PROJECT BONDS -------------- 440, 188,032 6F-08 032 INTEREST START DATE jars—as FIRST INTEREs-r DATE ALi BOND YEARS 37051,667 AVERAGE LIFE 6e936 YRS. AVERAGE COUPON 6.162 % PRINCIPAL RATE INTEREST PRINCIPAL DEBT SERVICE YEAR PAYMENTS ----- (%) -------------------------------- PAYMENTS & INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO -------- ...... 1988 5,250 15,454 15 Cap Int 1989 0 5o250 26, 26, 492 Cap Int 1990 1991 0 45. 000 5o250 5o250 26 25 26,492 70 Cap Int 1992 45,00o 5. Soo 22 8'93 6-7 105o85 109,60 1993 50,000 5, 700 20 70,231 105.88 1994 5o.000 5,goo 1-7, 331 E5 7, 3:; 1 110.38 1995 55, 000 61 100 14 69, 178 107*38 1996" 60, 9 0oo 6.200 10,644) 70,640 105.10 1997 65. 0(--)C) 6. 400 6, 71, 700 103.55 1998 70,000 60600 2 72 102.56 440, 188,032 6F-08 032 INTEREST START DATE jars—as FIRST INTEREs-r DATE ALi BOND YEARS 37051,667 AVERAGE LIFE 6e936 YRS. AVERAGE COUPON 6.162 % TAX INCREMENT ASSUMPTIONS SUMMARY REPORT - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA MAPL-EWOOD MALL ADDHTXON PROJECT ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF ASSESSED VALUE BASE = 2w 50 TOTAL = 0. 00 ASSESSED o VALUE • ($000) X TAX AVERAGE LEVY COLL MILL INCRMT INVEST, YEAR YEAR TOTAL BASE RATE AVAIL, RATE 1987 1988 16 16 -119m210 70,00 00000 1988 1989 16 16 1190210 70eOO 00000 1989 1990 909 17 119,210 70sOO 00000 1990 1991 909 17 119s210 70s00 00000 1991 1992 909 18 119.210 70.00 0.000 1992 1993 909 18 1190210 70,00 01000 1993 1994 909 19 1196210 70oOO 01 000 1994 1995 909 19 1190210 70.00 0 1995 1996 909 19 119m210 70,00 o,()()(--) 1996 1997 909 20 1190210 70.00 06 000 ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF ASSESSED VALUE BASE = 2w 50 TOTAL = 0. 00 3.16 Use of Tax Increment The City hereby determines that it will use 1000 of the captured assessed value of taxable property located in Economic Development District No. 1 -2. The tax increments derived from Economic Development District No. 1 -2 shall be - - used for the following activities: 1. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds. 2. 'To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of Development District No., 1. 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters, 462C, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469, or both. 5. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 6. To finance other purposes as may be allowed by the Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the nor for other oses ur prohibited b Section P P P y 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Act. 3.17 Prior Planned Improvements The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties within Economic Development District No. 1 -2 for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor shall increase the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -2, by the assessed value of the improvements for which the building permit was issued excluding the assessed value. of improvements for which r. P a building permit was issued during the three (3) month eri p od 35 76 immediately preceding said approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan as certified by the assessor. 3.18 Limitation on Qualification of Tax Increment Development on a parcel located within the Economic Development District No. 1 -2 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four (4) years of the date of certification of the original assessed value. For the purposes of this section the term "development" shall mean including demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to the parcel. Development shall not include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -2. If the City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences development, the City shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -20 3.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the' geographic, area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1 increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a Tax Increment Financing District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original assessed value by the county auditor. Housing District No. 1 -2 may therefore be expanded until 1992. 36 77 3.20 Limitation on Administrative Expenses In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.1789 Administrative expenses includes amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative - expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. 3.21 Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property ithin the district; or 3 the Y ( ) authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvemewnts within the distr.ict..." The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by 1988 or the County Auditor may dissolve the applicable Tax Increment Financing District, 3.22 Limitation on Qualification of Pr2pert in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 6, 'if, after four years from the date of certification of the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of 37 parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not installation of utility service .including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. If authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or _ renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. 3.23 Excess Tax Increments Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax .i increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, .Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount to: 1. prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their mill rate. In addition, the City may choose to modify the financing plan as described in Part II, 2.18, in order to provide further public improvements *within the development district, M 29 3.24 Administration of Tax Increment Financing Districts. Administration of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the assessed value of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the Tax Increment Finance _ Plan. 3.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or- before July 1, an annual financial report for all Tax Increment Financing Districts. The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report shall as nearly as possible: 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing District; 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, including a single Tax Increment Financing District that is part of a multidistrict project or' that is funded in part or whole through the use of a development account funded with tax increments from other Tax Increment Financing Districts or with other public money; and 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the report shall contain the following information: 1. The original assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of any captured assessed value shared with other tax districts; 39 3. The outstanding principal amount of bonds issued or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the duration of - the Tax Increment Financing District, the amount budgeted under the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: A. Acquisition of land and buildings through - condemnation or purchase; B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and D. Administrative costs, including the _ allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the City and the price paid by the developer; 6. The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under clause (3), that were issued on .behalf of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. 40 C� SECTION IV TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR HOUSING DISTRICT N0. 1 -3 [Adopted December 14, 19871 - - 4.1 Statement of Objectives See Section I. Subsection 1.5, Development Program for Development District No. 1. - 4.2 Development Program See Section I, Subsection 1.3, Development Program for Development District No. 1. 4.3 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District. HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 Economic Development District No.. 1 -3 is made up of certain parcels located within Development District No. 1. The specific parcels contained in the Tax Increment District are described in Exhibit F. + 4.4 Parcels to be Acquired In connection with Housing District No. 1 -3 the City intends to acquire from The Arkell Development Corporation and reconvey to The Arkell Development Corporation the following property: that portion of the following parcels south of Woodlynn Avenue: South 662.87 feet of North 1325.74 feet of the East 263.63 feet of NW Quarter of the NE Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 West 263.63 feet of Fast 527.26 feet of the North 1321.3 feet of NW Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 [an exact legal description will be supplied to the City by The Arkell Development Corporation upon adoption of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -31 41 Le, i., )- 4.5 Development Activity in Development District No. 1 for which Contracts Have Been Signed (a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road was developed - by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc. on County Road D, West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was William _ Kranz Construction and the cost of the project was $260,000. (b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center was developed by Curt Johnson and Joe Weis - Weis Builders, Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Weis Builders and the cost of the project was $2,318,383. (c) Maple Ridge Apartments was developed by Podawiltz Development Company on County Road D. west of _ White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Avon Lumber Company, Inc. and the cost of the project was $2,800,000. (d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments was developed by Maple Ridge Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The contractor was Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project was $3,999,000. (e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being developed by CPI. The contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000° (f) A Main Street Store at Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated Department Stores. The contractor is Sheehy Construction and the cost of the project is $2,000,000. 4.6 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within Development District No. 1 (a) The expansion of St. John's Northeast Hospital on Beam Avenue; (b) The development of a 60 unit Senior Citizen housing complex (known -as the Cottages of Maplewood) is being proposed by The Arkell Development Corporation; 42 02JP-3 (c) It is expected that additional development may occur in Development District No. 1 in the future. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at this time. 4.7 Estimated Cost of Project Costs and Supportive Data The estimated costs of the land acquisition and site improvements set forth in the Development Program to be made within Development District No. 1 and financed by tax increments to be derived from Housing District No. 1 -3 (together with any available tax increments from Economic Development District No. 1 - Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -1 and Housing District No. 1 -2 within Development District No. 1) are $275,000. LAND ACQUISITION AND /OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS [Section 1.7(c)(xi)] $275,000.00 $275,000 >00 LEGAL FEES, PLANNING FEES, COSTS OF ISSUANCE & CONTINGENCY $ 15,312°50 BOND DISCOUNT $ 8,000 <00 INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCREMENT TO FULLY FUND PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST $-101 TOTAL AMOUNTS OF BONDS TO BE SOLD r $400,000.00 SUPPORTIVE DATA FOR ESTIMATED COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ITEM BASIS FOR ESTIMATE LAND ACQUISITION AND Estimates by City Staff SITE IMPROVEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Estimates of Project Costs for legal assistance, bond issuance costs, planning provided by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. INTEREST ON BONDS PRIOR The amount of capitalized interest 43 G� TO RECEIPT OF TAX INCRE- will be equal to an amount suf- MENT TO FULLY FUND ficient to pay interest on the PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST Tax Increment Bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increments to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 4.8 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. It is anticipated that Tax Increment Bonds in the amount of $400,000 will be incurred with respect to this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1. 4.9 Sources of Revenue It is anticipated that the sources of revenue to a P y the costs associated with this portion of the development activities to be undertaken within Development District No. 1 are Tax Increment Bond proceeds. 4.10 Original Assessed Value The original assessed value of all taxable property in Housing District No. 1 -3 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1987 with respect to the assessed value of such property as of January 2, 1987, for taxes payable in 1987 is estimated to be $62,737. 4911 Estimated Captured Assessed Value Each year the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3 to calculate the tax increment payable to the City of Maplewood. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in Housing District No. 1 -3 above the original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in Housing District No. 1 -3 declines below the original assessed 44 valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the original assessed value was certified, the amount the original assessed value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court- ordered abatements. Upon completion of the development expected to occur within Housing District No. 1 -3 the City estimates the assessed value of the Property within Housing District No. 1 -3 _ to be $1,322,631. The captured assessed value upon completion is estimated to annually approximate $1,259,894. This amount will be captured for up to 25 years or until the Tax Increment Bonds are retired. The city requests 1000 of the available increase in assessed value from Housing District No. 1 -3 for repayment of Tax Increment Bonds and current expenditures authorized by this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 4.12 Type of Tax Increment Financing District Pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 12 of the Act, the City finds that Housing District No. 1 -3 qualifies as a "housing district ": 1. Housing District No. 1 -3 qualifies as a "housing district" because a portion of each project is intended for occupancy, in part, by persons of low and moderate income as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. 45 TABLE VI HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 - IMPACT ON TAX BASE: Original District as Future Assessed Percent of Assessed County of Ramsey 3,283,594,890 62,737 City of Maplewood 274,691,365 62,737 School Dist. #622 297,420,326 62,737 HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 - 3 IMPACT ON MILL RATES: Jurisdiction County of Ramsey City of Maplewood Other (1) School Dist. #622 District as Percent of Jurisdiction .0019% 1,322,631 .0403% .0028% 1,322,631 .4815% .0211% 1,322,631 .4447% Current Mill Rate Potential*Taxes Generated 32.225 42 18.387 24,319 6.843 9,051 59.110 78,181 Other taxing jurisdictions include: Metro Council, Regional Transit Commission, Mosquito Control D istrict, County Library District and Metro watershed Area �j TABLE VII $ G.O. Taxable Tax I ncrement Bonds of 1988 City of Maplewood, Minnesota Sources: Par amount of Bonds. LESS: Discount (1.96%) $4002000.00 ( 8,000.00) $392,000.00 Uses: Project Cost .Estimated Cost of Issuance Capitalized Interest Balance Total Uses $2759000.00 12,500.00 101,687.50 2 t812.50 $3929000.00 G� $ 400, 000 G 0 Taxable Tax Increment Bonds of 1988 City of Maplewood, Minnesota .Debt Service Schedule. Issue Date: 2/01/88 Settlement Date: 2/01/88 First Coupon: 8/01/88 Date Principal Coupon Interest t • Debt Service 8/01/88 2/01/89 0100 0 0.000 -___- 18, 337.50 -- 18, 337. 50� 8/01/89 .00 . 000 0.000 0.000 18,337.50 18 337.50 ' 2/01/90 8/01/90 0 .00 0.000 18,337.50 18,337.50 18,337.50 18 337.50 ' 2/01/91 0.00 50 000 • 0.000 8.600 18,337.50 18,337.50 8/01/91 0.00 0.000 18,337.50 16,187-50. 68 337.50 ' 2 .8/0.1/.92 50 0.00 8.800 16,.187-50 16, 187.50 .66,187.50 2/01/93 0.00 50 0.00 0.000 9.000 13,987.50 13,987.50 8/01/93 2/01/94 0100 000 01000 13,987.50 11,737.50 63.987. , 50 11,737.50 8/01/94 50 .00 . 000 9.150 0.000 11,737.50 61,737-50 ' 2/01/95 50 000. 00 , � 9.300 9,450.00 - 91450,00 g , 450.00 8/01/95 2/01/96 0 .00 50, 000.00 00000 71125.00 59, 450.00 7 125. � 00 8/01/96 0 .00 9.400 0.000 7,125.00 57.,125.00 2 /01/97 50, 000.00 9.500 41775.00 4 775.00 4177 5.00 8/01/97 2/01/98 � . 01 00 50, 000.00 0.000 , 2,400.00 54 , 775.00 2400 2 00 9.600 2,400.00 52,400.00 TOTALS 400,000.00 241 0 641,350.00 Accrued Interest to 2/01/88 = Total Bond Years = Gross Interest . Cost = $ Average Coupon NIC = Average Life Discount @ 98.0 OXAMUS am 241, 350.00 9.283% 9.590% 6.50 Years 8 File: maple.dbt Prepared by MILLER , & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 12/04/87 �9 2. The creation of Housing District No. 1 -3 is in the public interest because it will. preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and it will result in increased employment within the City. 4.13 Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts The Act allows "housing districts" to remain in existence for a period of 25 years from the receipt of the first tax increment. Based on these limitations it is anticipated that Housing District No. 1 -3 will remain in effect until December, 2012. 4.14 Estimated Impact of Tax Increment Financing The estimated impact of Housing District No. 1 -3 on the other taxing jurisdictions within Housing District No. 1 -3 is set forth on Table VI. 4.15 Cash Flow Analysis See Table VII. 46 � io) 4.16 Use of Tax Increm The City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the captured assessed value of taxable property located in Housing District No. 1 -3. The tax increments derived from Housing District No. 1 -3, shall be used for the following - - activities: 1. To pay principal and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds. 2. To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of Development.District No, 1. 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters, 462C, 469, or both. 4. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 462C, 469, or both. 5.. To finance project costs described in this Tax Increment Financing Plan. 6. To f inance other purposes as may. be allowed by the Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the1City nor for other purposes prohibited by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Act. 4.17 Prior Planned Improvements The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district enlargement with a listing of all properties wthin Housing District No. 1 -3, for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan by the City. The County Auditor shall increase the original assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3, by the assessed value of the improvements for which the building permit was issued, excluding the assessed value of improvements for which a building permit was issued during the three (3) month period immediately preceding said approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan as certified by the assessor. 47 ( if 4. Li.mi. tat i.on o Q ual.i.N ca tlo n of Tax Tncrement Development on a parcel located within Housing District No. 1-3 by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with this Tax Increment Financing Plan shall occur within four ( 4 ) years of the date of certification of the original assessed value. For the purposes of this section the term "development" shall mean including demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property, or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to the parcel. Development shall not include the installation of utility service including sewer and water systems. If development has not commenced within this period no additional increment shall be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3. If City or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences development, the City shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently .certified by the Commissioner of Revenue and add it to the original assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3. 4.19 Modifications of Tax Increment Financing Districts In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of Development District No. 1 or Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination or capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original tax increment financing plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a Tax Increment Financing District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the .or igina_l assessed value by the county auditor. Housing District No. 1 -3 may therefore be expanded until 1992. ;1 � Z- 4.20 Limitation on Adm Expense In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the district, relocation benefits paid'to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 4699178. Administrative expenses includes amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative' expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. 4.21 Limitation on Duration of Tax Increment Financing Districts Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three -year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Sections 469.152 through 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvemewnts within the district..." The City must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by 1988 or the County Auditor may dissolve the applicable Tax Increment Financing District, 4.22 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment Financing Districts Not Subject to Improvement Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 6, "if, after four years from the date of certification of the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district..., no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of 49 parcel or other site preparation including improvement of a street adjacent to a property but not instal .1 at ion of u tt, i l..i. ty service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original assessed value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the assessed value thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original assessed value of the tax increment financing district. 4.23 Excess Tax Increments Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the City shall use the excess amount to. 1. prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; 4. repay any loans including interest on these loans; or 5. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their mill rate. In addition, the City may choose to modify the financing plan as described in Part II., 2.18, in order to provide further public improvements within the development district. 50 4.24 Administration of T Increment Financin Districts. Administration of Housing District No. 1 -3 will be handled by the Office of the City Manager. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the assessed value of Housing District No. 1 -3 will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the Tax Increment Finance Plan. 4.25 Annual Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 5, the City must file with the State Auditor on or before July 1, an annual financial report for all Tax Increment Financing Districts. The report shall also be filed with the school board and county board. The report shall as _ nearly as possible: 1. Provide for full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in each Tax Increment Financing District; 2. Permit comparison and reconciliation with the City's accounts and financial reports; 3. Permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of each Tax Increment Financing District, including a single Tax Increment Financing District that is part of a multidistrict project or -that is funded in part or whole through the use of a development account funded with tax increments from other Tax Increment Financing Districts or with other public money; and 4. Be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the report shall contain the following information: 1. The original assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District; 2. The captured assessed value of the Tax Increment Financing District, including the amount of any captured assessed value shared with other tax districts; 5 qs° 3. The ou t.stand inq Dri ncri.pal amount of bonds i.ssuPd or other loans incurred to finance project costs in the Tax Increment Financing District; 4. For the reporting period and for the duration of the Tax Increment. Financing District, the amount budgeted under the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and the actual _ amount expended for, at least, the following categories: A. Acquisition of land and buildings through - condemnation or purchase; B. Site improvements or preparation costs; C. Installation of public utilities or other public improvements; and D. Administrative costs, including the _ allocated cost of the City; 5. For properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the City and the price paid by the developer; 6. The amount of tax exempt obligations, other than those reported under clause (3), that were issued on behalf. of private entities for facilities located in the Tax Increment Financing District. 52 nw 0 o � 1� J y , NMI one �M/ f•fwy N , r • w C r 0 r � WE ' ' DOOR w �� �•� / —12001, } f, � • Ow AA e -��— •"ll 10 T �r� V � .10 ' It J II Exhibit A ol,rr ; ' If 13 - 00 ------- t -oo 14 N r • w C r 0 r � ' ' DOOR w �� �•� / —12001, } f, � • e -��— •"ll 10 T �r� V � .10 ' It J II Exhibit A ' If 13 - 00 ------- t -oo 14 14 e000. —2009 I• 13 1• 0 � 1® • : 3 MIS 4 4w • 0 IY 0606 . �o 1 1• l 1!006 ®� s /m 9 • � 1 1 rI 111 1 1 • ' to � •�ws 6 I Exhibit B Zantigo: The easterly 145 feet of that part of Lot 1, Block 3, Viking Development Addition, according to the recorded - - plat thereof which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of on an assumed bearing of West, along said Lot 1, a distance of 285.00 feet the line to be described; thence on a distance of 236.91 feet, to the north and said line there terminating. Maple Ridge Square: said Lot 1; thence the south line of to the beginning of bearing of North a line of said Lot 1 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying east of the West line of the Northeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 and lying south of the North line of the South four (4) acres of the West Half (1/2) of the North Half (1/2) of the East Half (1 /2) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (torrens property); together with that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Maple .Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying sough of the South line of Lot 1 of said Block 1 and the westerly extension thereof except that part of said Lot 2 lying east of the West Line of the Northeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 and lying south of the North line of the South four ( 4 ) acres of the West Half (1/2) of the North Half (1/2) of the East Half (1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (abstract property); together with that part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof lying west of the West line of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (torr.ens property); together with that part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Maple Ridge Mall, according to the recorded plat thereof lying PS east of the west line of the Northwest Quarter. (1./4) ,of the Southeast Quarter (1/4 ) of the Northwes Quarter (1/4) of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 (abstract property), �9� Exhibit C Maple Ridge Apartments - County Road De That part of the w 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 lying south of the right -of -way of U.S. Highway No. 694, all in _ Section 34, Township 30, Range'22, Ramsey County, Minnesota containing approximately 5.06 acres. Exhibit D Maple Ridge Estates Apartments - Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue: Beginning on the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 29, Range 22, at a point in the center of the Stillwater Road, which is 227 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South along the Easterly line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the Southeast corner of said. Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Westerly along the southerly line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the centerline of Stillwater Road; thence Easterly along the centerline of Stillwater Road to the point of beginning; except therefrom the following: That part taken for Registered Land Survey No. 21 and also except part taken for Registered Land Survey No. 137, and also except that part lying Southeasterly of State Highway No. 212, and also except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South right -of -way line of Stillwater Avenue, a /k /a Stillwater Road Connection, and the West right -of -way line of State Highway No. 212; thence westward along the south right -of -way of Stillwater Avenue a distance of 50 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Nest right-of-way line of State Highway No. 212, which point is 50 feet Southwest of the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning. Subject to all easements of record. FXITTBTT E Main Street Store - Maplewood Mall That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 7, Block 1, _ Maplewood Mall Addition; thence on an assumed bearing of S 3 degrees 32' 27 W, along the easterly line of said Lot 7, a distance of 258.25 feet, thence on a bearing of East, 44.08 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence N 3 degrees 32' 27" E., 282.72 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the right for a distance of 304.55 feet, radius of said curve is 654.67 feet; thence on a bearing of East, not tangent to last described curve, 220.00 feet; thence on a bearing of South, 27.90 feet; thence on a bearing of East, 64.97 feet; thence on a bearing of South, 543.50 feet; thence on a bearing of _ West, 390.00 feet to the actual point of beginning. Subject to easements, if any. Mall Addition - Maplewood Mall That portion of Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition on which the Mall Addition will be constructed. A separate legal description for the Mall Addition will be established. xr1 T B 1*'P. F Cottages of Maplewood that portion of the following parcels south of Woodlynn Avenue: South 662.87 feet of North 1325.74 feet of the East 263.63 feet of NW Quarter of the NE Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 West 263.63 feet of East 527.26 feet of the North 1321.3-feet of NW Quarter of . Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 [an exact legal description will. be supplied to the City by T:he Arkell Development Corporation upon adoption of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -31 Li - O!-;o MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND RElDEVELOPMLN'T' AU`T'HORI'T'Y October 6, 1987 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Fischer called the meeting to order at 2:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners: Dale Carlson Present Thomas Connelly Absent Lorraine Fischer Present Clemence Kwapi ck Absent (resigned, but 'no replacement) Greg Schmit Present 3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Carlson moved, and Commissioner Schmit-seconded to approve the April 14, 1987, minutes as submitted. Motion carried, ayes all. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as submitted. 5. NEW BUSINESS a. Cottages of Maplewood (PUD /Variances /Tax- Exempt and Tax - Increment Financing) John Bossardt (Bossardt and Christenson, developer), Gary Tucci (Tucci - Montgomery, architect) and William Bissonett (Arkell, site manager) attended. Barbara Kilbourne (Walker Methodist, Hazel Ridge manager) also attended. PUD /Variances: Commissioner Schmit moved, and Commissioner Carlson seconded to recommend that the city council approve the recommendation presented in the staff report to: (1) Deny the storm -sewer waiver request (2) Deny the concrete -curb variance request (3) Approve the PUD and five associated variances less than variances ( less parking spaces and one garage per unit, less than 4,000 square feet of site area per townhouse unit, more than /o`f� Attachment 9 eight townhouse units in a townhouse structure, and less than 20 feet of landscape buffer along the south property line) , subject to the conditions presented in the staff report. Motion carried unanimously. Tax Exempt- -Tax Increment Financing: Commissioner Schmit moved, and Commissioner Carlson seconded to recommend that the city council approve the recommendation presented in the staff report for. the Cottages of Maplewood to. (1) Grant preliminary approval of about $2.8 million in tax- exempt financing. (2 ) Grant concept approval for about $200,000 in tax - increment financing. Approval was subject to the recommended conditions. Motion carried unanimously. Barbara Kilbourne, representing Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence, supports the HRA's recommendation to restrict the occupants of 75% of the units to 110% of the area median income. She believes this is an important safeguard to insure that this development will not have a negative effect on Hazel Ridge's ability to rent up and keep the more expensive Hazel Ridge units rented. b. HRA /HRC Liaison Commissioner Appointment, Commissioner Carlson moved, and Commissioner Schmit seconded to recommend that the city council appoint John Pre y as the liaison commissioner between the HRA and HRC to replace Clemence Kwapick who has resigned as the liaison. 6. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Fischer adjourned the meeting at 5 p.m. � 5") Planning Commission Minutes 11 -16 -87 — 3 — B. Code Amend nt.: Setback to Residential Zones The. main concern w'th this ordinance was whether the equired 20 —foot landscaped area shoNd be allowed to be reduced to 0 feet if screening was provided. Commissioner Ayers move the planning commissi n approve the ordinance, with the exception . of sec ion 3, which would allow a 10 —foot landscaped area with screening. Commissioner Cardinal. seconde Commissioner Goins moved the fol owi g amendment: "The community design review board may allow the 1 ndscaped area to be reduced to ten feet if it includes the scree g requirements in Section 36-27(c)." Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes -- Fischer, Fiola, Barrett, oins, Sletten Na s-- Sigmundi k, Cardinal, Ayers, Axd bl, Larson Motion failed. Voting on the origi al motion: Ayes - -Aye Card i na 1, S1 etten, Sigmundi k, arson, Barrett Nays -- Axdahl, iola Abstentions: Goins, Fischer Motion ap( roved. C. PUD, Approval for Reduced Parking and Variance: Woodlynn Avenue (Cottages of Maplewood) Secretary Olson gave the staff report. John Boss ard, . from Bossard— Chri sti anson Development, answered questions on the project. Commissioner Goins moved the planning commission recommend: .I. Approval .of the resolution to approve the Cottages of Maplewood planned unit development for one year, subject to the following conditions: A. This development.shall not be converted to nonseniors housing without revision of the planned unit development. For purposes of t h i s permit, seniors housing is defined as a residence occupied by persons that are 50 years of age or older. Planning Commission — 4 - Minutes 11- 1.6 -87 B. Trailers and vehicles transportation needs shal determines that there are C. If council determines parking after- one year of be required. that are not required for day —to -day 1 not be parked on —site, unless the city excess parking spaces available. that there is insufficient on —site .95% occupancy, - add i ti onal parking may D. .Adherence to :the si to plan . date= stamped October l,''1987 and the floor.plans date — stamped September.29 with the changes required by the community design review board. Future changes may be approved by the community design review board. II. Authorize 87 parking spaces, including 40 garages, rather than the code requirement of 120 spaces, including 60 garages, on the basis that: A. The parking —space requirements contained in the zoning code do not realistically apply to the proposed development, because these r-equi rements are designed for family housing and do not consider the fewer number of.cars per unit needed for senior housing. B. The city has approved a reduced number. of parking spaces, and garages for all previous senior developments. C. The reduced number of parking spaces has proven adequate for a similar project in Stillwater. III. Deny the concrete curbing variance, on the basis that: A. Omitting the curbing would not produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the ordinance. Curbing adds to the aesthetics and drainage of a site. Curbing also provides a definitive boundary for the parking spaces and the driveways that will prevent rollups onto the yard area, as well as significantly reduce the potential for yard damage from snowplowing. B. The variance is not required for reasonable and.practicable phys i cal development of the si te. ' Rather, t h i s variance is proposed solely on the basis of financial considerations. C. Each of the other subsidized seniors residences has provided concrete curbing. IV. Approval of a ten —foot setback variance from the south lot line, provided screening is included that meets the screening requirements of Section 36- 27(c). Approval is on the basis that: A. There is a need for senior housing. B. Senior housing creates less noise than a conventional multiple— dwelling project. C. The building is o n l y one — story. Planning Commission - 5 - Minutes 11 -16 -87 D, The configuration of the bu i.l di ngs is unique. E. :Certain regu 1 ati ons contai ned i n thi s chapter do not real i sti cal l y apply tothe proposed development because of the unique nature of the proposed development. F. The variance would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. G. The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result. from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. H. The variance would not constitute a threat of a substantive nature to the property .values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of adjacent or nearby land, nor be detrimental to the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people, I. The variance is required for reasonable and practicable physical development and is not required solely on the basis of financial considerations. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes -- Goins, Fischer, Ayers, Barrett, Fi of a, Si ground i k, Sl etten Nays -- Cardinal Abstenti Axdahl, Larson D. Tax - Exempt and Tax - Increment Financing: Cottages of Maplewood. Secretary Olson e x p l a i n e d the staff report. Commissioner Goi ns moved the planning commission adopt the-following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THE CITY'S ADOPTION OF THE MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR HOUSING DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 'TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN OF THE CITY WHEREAS, the City's adoption of the modified Development Program for proposed Development District No. 1, as enlarged and Tax - Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3, has been submitted to the Maplewood Planning Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134; Planning Commission Minutes 11- 1.6 7'87 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed modified Development and Tax - Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3 to determine .the consistency of .the Development Program and Tax-- Increment Financing Plan to the .. P l a n of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Maplewood Planning Commission that the modified Development Program and Tax— Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1 -3 i s .consistent with the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. Adopted: November 1987. Attest: Chair Secretary. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Fi of a, Fischer, Goi ns, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten E. Planning Commi sion Appointment Commissioner Slette moved t t the vacancy created by the election of Commissioner Ross ach be advertised and interviews.held according to the rules of proce ure. !j .Commissioner Goi ns seco ed. Ayes -- Axdahl ,. Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Fi of a, Fischer, Goi ns, Larson, Sigmund i k, Sl etten IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS X. COMMISSION PRESENT IONS A. Council Meeti g: Nov embe XI. STAFF PRESENTATI NS A. Council Me ting -- November 2 X I I . ADJOURNMENT Meeting ad j u rned at 10:40 p.m. 9, 1987 1987: Albert Goins MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 1987, 7 P. M. .1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Present .Tom Deans Absent Bob Present Jim Kochsiek Present Earl Marto Prest Marvin Erick on Pres en , t y III. APPROVAL OF MI UTES A. J u l y 28, 198 The minutes of J u l y 28, 19,$7, were tabled due to lack of a quorum. B. October 27, 1987 Board Member Peterson mo ed approval of the minutes of October 27, 1987. Board Member Erickson seconc3'Qd Ayes - -all C. November 10/ 1987 Board Member ochsiek moved appro al of the minutes of November 10, 1987. Board.Membir.Erickson seconded Ayes- -.all IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Board ember Kochsiek moved approval of the agenda as submitted. _ Board Member Peterson seconded Ayes - -all. U. UNF IS BUSINESS VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Plan Review -- Cottages of Maplewood John Bossard was present representing Arkell Development. He discussed the project with the board. Gary Tush, architect for the project, was also present. Community Design Review Board — 2 — Minutes 11 -24 -87 ..� Board Member Peterson moved approval of site and architectural plans date — stamped. October: 29, .1987 -for the Cottages of Maplewood, subject to: 1. Approval of plans by the Community: Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 2. All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden. gate and shall be a color and material compati bl e with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by concrete — filled steel posts, or the equ ivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosed is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. 3. Any exterior building or roof —top equipment shall be decoratively screened and . hi dden from view. 4. If construction has not begun with 18 months of approval, board review shall. be repeated. 5. Site security lighting.shall be provided and shall be directed or, shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 6. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 7. The landscape plan shall be submitted for review board approval. identifying the placement, quantity, size and species of all planting materials. Landscaping and screening shall comply with Section 36 -27. 8. Reflectorized stop signs shall be placed at each exit. 90 All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this.construction shall be restored and resodded. 10. Any waiver of the parking code shall be subject to'council approval. 1.1. The applicant shall construct an eight—foot—wide asphalt sidewalk along .their entire north property l i n e on the boulevard. This sidewalk shall also abut the east '20 feet of the Salvation Army Church site if that portion of land becomes incorporated into the Cottages' site. The sidewalk shall blend to meet all driveway crossings to avoid any severe drop in grade.. The construction specifications are subject to staff approval. 12. The applicant shal proof of ownership of the 20 feet of property (the Salvation Army Church site) along the west l i n e of his property or revise . the site p l a n to fit the existing lot lines. If the easterly 20 feet of the Salvation Army site is used for the Cottages development, the Salvation Army plan must be revised and approved by the Community Des i qn Review Board. Community Design Review Board - 3 — Minutes 11 -24 -87 13. Approval of. drai nape, uti 1 ity, - grading and erosion .control plans by the city engineer. . These plans shall include, but not be 1 i mi ted to . construct'i on . of on —site storm sewer. If the site wi l 1 drain south, a pond must be i ncluded i n . the southeast corner of the si to and. , an outl et pi pe � from the pond to the storm sewer pipe in Lydia Avenue. 14. The driveways shall be posted for "No Parking - -Fire Lane ". 15. Submittal of a letter of credit and developers agreement for: a. The restoration of Woodlynn Avenue. b. The pond and outlet pipe, if needed. 16. The west north /south driveway shat 1 be named "Frederick Lane" and the east north /south driveway shall be named "Beebe Lane ". The names of the center driveway and the east /west driveway shall be approved by the director of public safety. 17. The address for each of the units shall be posted to be readi visi from the driveways. The location and s i z e of the numerals shall be approved by the director of public safety. 18. Provide concrete curbing as required by city code. 19. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. Board Member Kochsiek.seconded Ayes - -all B. Ordinanc X orage Buildings Board Member ed the board recommend adoption of the ordinance. to allow metbuildings in an M -1, light manufacturing zone, and also in BC, bmercial zones by conditional use permit Board Member 1 .econded Ayes - -all VII. VISftOR PRESEN TIONS VIII. BOARD P ESENTATIONS IX. STAFF PREXNTATIONS X. ADJOURNME Meeting fidjournecl\ at 7:45 p.m. AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Col 1 f ns Subject: Application For Liquor License Dilio d..� Date: October 7, 19$7 t ecGedd _ -� D ate Introduction Deborah D. Snyder. Ronald L. Ri ngl i ng, Robert S. Snyder and Del vi n D. Junker have made application for an intoxicating liquor license.at 1780 E. Co. Rd. D. The establishment will be operated. under the nave , of Days Inn (formerly Holiday Inn). Background i Investigations have been on the four individuals; and they have no known contacts with the police, nor can we find that they hold a 1-iquor license in any other establishment in the state. Recommendation After careful background investigations on these individuals and discus— sions with them, I do not find sufficient reason to deny their applica tion for an intoxicating liquor 1 i cense. Action Required Application for intoxicating liquor 1 i cense for City Council review and approval or denial, KVC:js cc City Clem Liquor File 87- 012139 gas . cin of MnrLew000 APPLICATION FOR EWOXICATING ][IQUOR LICENSE THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part- nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUE 'ION MUSS' BE ANSWERED 1. I Deborah Dorrian Snyder as Officer , ' (Individual owner, officer or partner) C or Maplewood Hotel Corporation, Inc. �• for and in behalf o h eb a 1 for. an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at 7 y PP Y 1780 E. County Road D, Maplewood MAP LEWOOD (Legal Description per at exhibit) in the City of (Give address and legal description) Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No 95 of Maplewood. 2. Give applicants' date of birth: 26 Seatember i952 (Day) — (Month) (Year) 3. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: Deborah Dorrian Snyder, 28 65 Maplewood Rd., Wayzata, Mid 55391 (3 yrs.) 2316 Lafayette Rd., Wayzata, MN (7 yrs.) pp 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? Yes ' If naturalized state date and place of naturaliz atio If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship .including naturalization of each officer or partner. Deborah Dorrian Snyder, U SA 1:4 Robert S tephen Snyder, USA Ronald Lee Rin ling, USA 1 Del Junker, U. S. A. 5. The person who executes this appucation snali give wuG b yr JLU0U"JJJU D lbl iacaa +v .... �.••••� ��'�• • Robert Step Sn der, 2865 Maple Rd., Wayzata, M 55391 Husband. _ p Y 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years? Real Estate Investments i O C'" 1 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner If a corporation, date of incorporatio May 6 , 1987 - state in which incorpora Minnesota - amount of authorized capitalization 1,000,000 shares @_ $.01/share par amount of paid in capi $700, 000.00 if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta NZA give purpose of corporatio to own and operate hotels name. and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each: Deborah Dorrian Snyder, 2865 Maplewood Rd., Wayzata, MN 340 shares (Name) (Address) -- (City) Robert Stephen Snyder, 2865 Maplewood Rd., Wayzata, MN 50 shares Ronald Lee Ringling, 4238 Crocker'Lane, Edina, MN 390 shares Delvin Dean Junker, 21102 Sandal wood,Wildwood, FL 32785 220 shares If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? ___._. Number of certificate of authority If this application,, is for a new Corporation; include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. 8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? First 9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, .how is the location of the building classified? BC Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? Yes 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school? State the approximate distance of the establishment from sucli school or churc —.— of owner of building r- 11. State name and address g Maplewood Hotel Corporation, 13911 Ridge dale Dr.,, Minnetonka, MN 55343 has owner of building any connection, directly or in- directly, with applican Applicant is a sh areholder, Officer and Director a t ? •12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? No 1987 taxes paid in advance 13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details No 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail No 15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details No 16. Is applicant, or a n y of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality i in which this license is to be issued? _N_Q__ If so, in what capacity? 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details Norwest Leasinq, Lease dated 5/83, coverina tables and chairs in restaurant only. Address: Norwest Leasing, NorthwestemBank, Minneapolis, MIV 55480. Lease is bein 'bou ht out. No lour a fu rniture or equipment is leased. • r directly 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, Y or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota ? N o Give name and address of such establishmen 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer - Kell S '. Vice President, Shelard National Bank, St. Louis Park ence Bank: Mike Y , Monarch Food service, Minneapolis, MN , Maplewood State Bank Attn: Jack Hillstrom, 2866 White Bear Ave., Maplewood, MN 55at 20. Do you possess a retell dealer's identification card issued. by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 31st of this year? Give number of sam Current #3320, NO -app iu a intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? No 21. Does applicant intend to sell g 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, ung device an d a pp gam - b apparatus, or permit any gambling therein No R P 23. Are the remises now occupied, or. to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive he are contiguous to the Maplewood Holiday from any other business establishment?-- Inn Hotel, soon to be changed to "Days Inn" 24. State trade name to be use Days Inn - S Paul , Ma_plewood Mall _ 25. State name of person that will operate store_.._ Deborah Dorrian Snyder 26. Give Federal Retail it Li uor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number 58- 165 -1505 27. If of sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? N If N state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year 28. If you are building a .new building for the purposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows: $0. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- ment of each partner. 31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock - tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other pertinent data). Cocktail lounge of 175 seat adjacent to restaurant of 120 seats, both included in a. hotel of 120 rooms. 32. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the answer to No. 31 above Have owned and operated hotels since 1982. 33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations. promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. ' cl JEANNE SCHADT NOTARY PUBI IC — MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY My commission expires 12 -22 -82 ' ( Signature of Applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD. REPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the applicant, or his associates named herein have not been convicted with- - in the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as hereinafter stated. MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved by: - -- T Me. REPORT ON PREMISES BY FIRE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the premises herein described have been inspected and that all Laws of the State of Minnesota and Municipal Ordinances relating to Fire Protection have been complied with. MAPLEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT Approved by: _ Title. a . TRISTAR MAPLEWOOD HOTEL CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET (as of 8- 12 -87) ASSETS CASH IN BANK $505,000.00 PREPAID CLOSING COSTS $ 32,000.00 FIXED ASSETS,AT COST 1,800 TOTAL $2,337 LIABILITIES LONG TERM DEBT $1,6321.000.00 SSHAREHE TIDERIS EQUITY $ 705,000.00 • TOTAL $2,337,000.00 ' 4 1987. Attested to this � day of Au , T TLE ThStar Hotel Corporation 13911 Ridgedale Dr. Suite 249, Minnetonka, MN 55343 (612) 542.3220 OF CREDIT — CHECK THE -APPROPRIATE SOX (Nome of Lender) Individual — If yuu check this box, provide Financial Information only about yourself. Joint, with _ Relationship If you check this boot, provide Financial Information about , ourself and the other person PERSONAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF NOTE: Any willful misrepresentation could result in o violation of Federal Law (Sec. 18 U.S.C. 1014) Birth ' f p i- Date 3 '� 3 U 19 Statement Dote �" �' d 19 ess a 0 — City � ��9r d State /Zip /17 Social Sec. No Phone a 'Z �" �' a L No. of Oependents Bus. or Occupation ��� S ¢ r It/.0 & .9 5 414 . �' Bus. Phone 2 It- % - 7J NOTE: Coln let* all of Section It BEFORE Section 1 ccrTln►1 1 • ASSETS r"aNWAN Wjr.*0q% cwus LIABILITIES r """"" NiNi°f c ""' Cash On Hand & in Banks Sec. II -A Z- ov 0 0 1 2 1 Note Due to Banks Ins Premiums G' 0 0 ... Cost. Value of Life Insurance Sec. 11 -8 L o o O — 22 N tes Due to Relotives & Friends Sec. II -H _Re Othe Expenses /�/ t? •� U. S. Gov. Securities Se 11 _ S -- 23 Notes Due to O thers Sec. 11 - H / O 4 0 0 0 Other Marketable Securiti Sec. I II-C 4) .... 24 Acco & Bi ll s Payable Sec. 11 -H S Bankers Systems, Inc., St. Cloud, Minn. Form PS - 15 Note b A ccount s Rece ivoble - G ood Sec. 11 -D O ther Assets Readily Convertible to Cash - - - I - T — . _._ _ _ _ _25 Unpaid Inco Taxes Due - M Federal ❑ State 26 Other Un paid Taxes & Interes _ 27 Loans on Life Insurance Polic S ec. 11 -6 28 Contract Accounts Payable Sec. II -H 29 Cash Rent Owed TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 30 Other Liabilities Du withi I Year - Itemize Real E state Own ed Sec . II -E tMortooges b Contracts Own Sec. 11 -F v 0 31 32 N &_ Accounts Recei - Doubtful S ec. 11 - 33 TOTA CURRE L IABILITIES N otes D From Relativ & Friends Sec. 11 -D 34 Real E state Mo rt�aq es Payable Sec II -E I . Other Securities - Not Reader M arketable Sec. 11 - C 35 lie & Ass essments Payo Personal Property Sec. 11 - Q � �� ��nOr.� rf' they Ass - Ite mize c k / W A S 1 16 f ovo !nb O DOO 0 0 0 ""' --"- 36 Other Debts - Itemize 37 .� r �'�1C u 4 rrt7 I j ? 1 ' 38 Tot al Liobilities — ZOO G -�' ?.'�G,D d ej _ 39 Net Worth (Tot Assets minus To tal Liobilities) " 7-01 e" 0 0 TOTAL ASSETS 1 �sC ---- 40 TOTAL LIABILITIES &NET WORTH O Dad �~ ANNUAL INCOME Type of Account ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL EXPENSES On Deposit 3 ry, Bonuses & Commissions S O_ 00 •----' I ncome Taxes As Endorser, Co -m or Guarantor S SU_ O �l� ..-- idends & Interest $ 1 .rr Other Taxes On L eases or Contract -_ - -_ —,, Legal Cloims - "T --- _ C.7 0 t al & Lease I (Net) S -� D tJ U -�-- Ins Premiums - $ _ "any. child support, or separate maintenance income need not be revealed it do not with to have it considered as a basis for repaying this obligation. 'k_ Income— Itemize S Mortgage Payments _ _ Payoble SECTION p•'bp f _ tide the following information only if Joint Credit is checked above. ,er Per Sala Bon uses &_Co mmissions S _ _ pony, chill support, or separate maintenance income need not be revealed if do not wish to have it considered ac a basis for repaying this obligation, :_� Inc of Oth Pe rson— Iternize TOT AL S P/lo 1 0 0 0 _Re Othe Expenses /�/ t? •� S _ S -- ---- ----- TOTAL S D O v GENERAL INFORMATION Type of Account CONTINGENT LIABILITIES On Deposit any Assets Pledged? 19 N ❑ Yes (See S 11) As Endorser, Co -m or Guarantor S SU_ O �l� ..-- _yQV o Defendo i any Suits _or L e_aoi Actions? �._& plain): - N o ❑ Ye - -- !�- r On L eases or Contract -_ - -_ —,, Legal Cloims - $ $ r ve you ever been declar Bankrupt in the last 14 years? No ❑ Yes plain): Fed - S In come Tax S _ Other - S SECTION II -. fb.. ru e ♦ M&OC • ►ith tuni•re rnt to T^ o A LILIC 11 :.t -11 D_ -1 C.L-L� 1 CeP &i...% 11 -G1 NA,b1E OF BANK Type of Account ,, Type of Ownership On Deposit Notes Due Banks COLLATERAL (if Any) & Tyoe of Owner s hip r a lC l.�trs r) !� Cash on Hand slete Rest of Section 11 on Reverse Side) TOTALS i s S Bankers Systems, Inc., St. Cloud, Minn. Form PS - 15 1 / "l_ OUD S joim. 401 ' N../.:. � L. v:... R.{. I.. 1�NA��. 4M.. Y.. Y.►. I.• 1... L. r. IY✓. �M... r".. 1 :rL.• �M.4_r.�....n�/w.r w.. «.- ......�J..rtit. ... w... ... ..�. ..... .... .. 1... .. ._•. .•. �:.5. ..-.- - _ .. ..i .-.. ..v _. .._.. � _- ._..._�•�... - _-- ._._.. .... _�..- _ SECTION I I Continued a t Iec IMC11DA , t :.r< wit., &k..a. ann.-i. &!~,.s .,r.,, ewnl COMPANY Policy of Policy Cosh Surrender Value Policy Loon from InsuronceCo. Other Loans Policy asCollot') BENEFICIARY M"r "r' %W..: "�� �"" R stc Amount Pledged No. of Shores Stock Indicate those Not Registered in Your N ome Owners S U.S. Gov, Sec. M'ktoble Sec. vil o. • to Secure Loons L . �e pt ► r• M+ r) 1 /r T fA� GIP TOTAL S I 4 , e a ' S� 1 . /p. 0-0 0 _- _ _.. .•tt.ArO j "I "d1 fu•N s,.. t Li., sat F MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS OWNED (Indicate by a ✓ If Others have an Ownership Interest) 1 0. 0 0 a � � r• r r • I 1 1 0, 0 Do I e S — " � a O 1 ..nnta �' �e+ •� .. Z V U elej ZD tJVO TOTALS S S It r CVr11DITIG1_q nWNFD !In•lurlinn U - 9 - Gnv't Rnnde anA all nther SEnelce and Bnnde` Face Value -Bonds DESCRIPT ION Type of COST Market Value Market Value M"r "r' %W..: "�� �"" R stc Amount Pledged No. of Shores Stock Indicate those Not Registered in Your N ome Owners S U.S. Gov, Sec. M'ktoble Sec. vil o. • to Secure Loons L . �e pt ► r• M+ r) 1 /r T fA� GIP TOTAL S I 4 , e a ' S� 1 . /p. 0-0 0 _- _ _.. .•tt.ArO j "I "d1 fu•N s,.. t Li., sat F MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS OWNED (Indicate by a ✓ If Others have an Ownership Interest) 1 0. 0 0 a � � r• r r • I 1 1 0, 0 Do I e S — " � a O 1 ..nnta �' �e+ •� .. Z V U elej ZD tJVO ?. v j1 �: r H C It C A d JOB - -- – ovv D to 40 -- O 17,10401 ►v o 0G o - tic 13o-1a _ TOTALS l s ms, V v S n NnTVC ANn Arrn11NTC Dr C !►rfnw...D...�l,l.... A....a j.. Yom„ InaS..:�.,allv�.�lndiral..6.► a �✓ :� t�tl. 6..r. a t�wn.rel,in In�.rw :tt - MAKER /DEBTOR W When Due Original Am't Balance Due Good Accounts Balance Due Doubtful Acc Ots Bal. Due Notes Rel. & Friends SECURITY (If Any) 1 / ct ' S Ze S J2.< o o U S /� S V o♦ �' /.S�utk� /�,� �, / S S S $ A l oof G. �e pt ► r• M+ r) 1 /r T fA� GIP TOTAL S I 4 , e a ' S� 1 . /p. 0-0 0 _- _ _.. .•tt.ArO j "I "d1 fu•N s,.. t Li., sat F MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS OWNED (Indicate by a ✓ If Others have an Ownership Interest) _ TOTALS $ TOTAL S — " E REAL ESTATE OWNED '"Indicate by a ✓ if Others have an Ownership Interest) TITLE IN NAME OF I ✓ i Description b l ocati o n Dote Acquired Original Cost Present Value of Real Estate Amount of Ins. Carried MORTGAGE OR CON P 8a f�a . Due yrnent_ - Maturity r 'fo Wh Payable Homeste 00 4^ 04 1 / ct ' S Ze S J2.< o o U S /� S V o♦ �' /.S�utk� /�,� �, / S +l "' -$ L / �e pt ► r• M+ r) 1 /r T fA� GIP TOTAL S I 4 , e a ' S� 1 . /p. 0-0 0 _- _ _.. .•tt.ArO j "I "d1 fu•N s,.. t Li., sat F MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS OWNED (Indicate by a ✓ If Others have an Ownership Interest) TOTALS $ Cant, Mt g ✓ MAt.tk ----• • -- - -• • Nomc _ Address - - - -- PROPERTY COVERED Storting Dote p a ent �" Maturit Y Balance Due COLLATERAL (If Any) / cY S 2 to c +a �� S �, V .0 S +l "' -$ L / — 7 -1 , . I TOTALS $ TOTAL TOTAL i5 G PERSONAL PROPERTY • I 6 v a ✓ il: ON..re have an C>wn.reMn int.rwetl (tow s... t s:.. III DESCRIPTION ✓ Dote When New Cost When New Value Today LOANS ON PROPERTY _ Balance Due Ta WkCwn Po�1e Automobiles i. � .� '� r � �r COLLATERAL (If Any) / cY S 2 to c +a �� S �, V .0 S +l "' -$ L / — 7 -1 , TOTALS $ TOTAL S — " U N nTCC rnt.l..• & R .. L _ mrtrtnan. inrl Ine...�w�w rw.ti.wwwv 1 n�wr1 ArrnifUTC ANt1 Q6 1 C Aun r^uTnArTC nAVAQI C PAYABLE TO Other l)bl;gors (If An When Due Notes Due To I, R & Friends Notes Due 'Oti►ers' (Ivnt Banks) Accounts & Bills Payable Car tracts Poyoble COLLATERAL (If Any) S — 7 -1 , TOTALS $ For the purpose of procuring credit from time to time, IMe furnish the foregoing as a true and accurate statement of my /our financial condition. Autl+orizalionis hereby given to the Lender to verify in any monne it deems appropriate any and all items indicated on this statement. The under- signed also ogre e to notify the Lender immediately in writing o a y sign'ficont ac erse change in such financial condition. r Date Signed / 1��.•:r =. Signature _ ! Signature 1 tOrt�t+ Peetw /� � d pLclDle) .•.. .r Yrwv . .... .w ._ +.p'. .Nrt r •. .•-. -, ... ,- .r•.;.M- aw- ••- s.^_Trw w.r .,...*.r. «r -•'� •.'C .. ... _•_ .. -� .. . - . . -.. _ ..... .... -- .... � { PERSONAL P!to.Smk ftaknol Jlaockrtiatj - Lake, ao.r.tw � ••�• ,,,,, • • •• r .. • FINANCIAL STATEMEN k a w *u may appy f o r g extension o f credit 4xiividually or joirrth► w i t h 3nWw app . Thie t�tatm n wm d and any app�icabie schedules may be cortap�eted jointly by ca - If their assets and aab*bw can be msaningfu�y and fairly presented on a myna w basis atherwise aepa kfe statenmus and sctwdubs must be provided. if you are applying for an unsectxed separate loan you do w used b oompiete any intr MM*)n a joint applicant or other person unless you wish the j&" applicant's or other perscon'ri kworne to be roiled upon as the bads for repayment. For the purpose of obtaining credit from time to time with the bank me foilowirx; statement and kftIIWbW@ar9 furtwstwd as a coMplete, true, and accunde statiemsrd of tiw finanaal condition of the undersVi9a AM amounts are muMW to the nearest $100. . APPLICANT CO- APPLICANT So" Addr.as � C.3 S"M Admen ah► �� GtYvBr.rzb SStiic, orr a e+rth t � 1 r. o.w of ea+ d soar+ smam y Number Soar) Sow" M~ 7 - So - /3D.to • TWO T.�.phorr Ems. �► • 7 1 Poa+eonrrm. U_A.<j 1� 9rM ngmnde mWWookoft Sod MarRai Stisua• l p YA jwM i0''S�EPI�A Mental Sam* t J aaED Ci uED r? r1 . "P1aaw �snih thin rtiorn��Iron onh► A Your spo�ra rn/ ua� or bo WiDM br this acs�otsM. ASSETS LIABILITIES — Carr+ (SCheduie t) / O Ob Shod Tw m Now Ow FW wwoal kw ftAww (SdmAft 6) vt*! Seumfws (SduKk" 2) 3 0 oao oNs Ow n Owe (Sdoduto d) Short Wm N th Cash %WW Schadttla 3) Crew AUWWU and Oft Ow (SaMdtr. 7) Iwortgmgn and Contracts Mold by *u (Sdiadtd.4) (Z OO, komm Uww ( 1) NormsomM (SChMA 5) 8 OGb . boom ant Loam and Contras (S&oukAa e) i ter Aso Emaim (Sch@dLde 5) S � oo I wigapas on Nom. (SchadWe S) 128 oij ftA gwwv (Pftt a tom) G C MWXPQ a on Othw Poo Estatr (Schadute S) Psrmm wW AA*rwwnt Acwurft kwltida Mil► Acoomm x � �. Z o•• 01m tla agm (Detlor6e) AmIo ooisa tCMaa . ► $1 E�.4s.bG. � o • w ? 1 L o00 Pwaonal plepwy '� •00 Ottw Ars1r (Orwnba) N yG v era o o o 0 ov TAW J� l e� -'• I o0o v V6 ! p v� oo 't • d • a r = 3 y 9G coo (� An" Um m L,.e� W81 "m wart+ .• o C%: PIoase cV-ttW your Banker if you no( 351stanc• with completing ;here schedules. Rr I all amounts to the nesresi $100. ANNUAL INCOME* APPLICANT [ CO-APPLICANT PLEASE ANSWER EACH OUESTION (YES or NO) APP. CO -AP►' $° Y "� Are you • Co- Mskar, Enowser, or Guarantor of � Other person s ooe�? 6orw�ws.Comm�ss+ons .. �. R� A L � STATC t O � po Are you a defendant in any suit or Ia9aI =100 Z .� Orvie.rx::.sttVsst r-^ � f' co 0 , coo Not Reef Estate Rent C o t g O o o TOW S a he d µd +any Mr+slyou - -� Other ( ua)' Cb Haw you "woo a wdl? �� �o�� mfa.•r a'Z o co Total .30 0 0 00 • ac aws nom am" vw swown o► owe~= owwms n.M pm w so woo wriew pr +w.. omwwre •. w•s w. fsorw4m SCHEDULE ! / CASH nu NANn Alan IN 8Amsoc Nam. of Bar* at Fumv cw IrtawAutwn Type d Account Account ealancc fisted C Currant �. Z TOW S - -� scHFnw F 91 -Qvrttam nwhism Par \Owue or D Descnptwn R Regisared f fisted C Currant �. Z SCHEDULE 3 ; LIFE INSURANCE V, 1 ° Sem 4 RECEIVABLES DUE ..J ME ON MORTGAGES AND CONTRACTS i N •j 1 Narrw of Deb Desuwtion d pre FNq Lien a Second Lion Date d Matunry RepaynwM i Tenn. Batar+c�e 5 t Due Repayn+erit Terrns • �� (/91 lf aa W ! LAZ •j 1 Narrw of Deb Desuwtion d pre FNq Lien a Second Lion Date d Matunry RepaynwM i Tenn. Batar+c�e 5 t Due Repayn+erit Terrns • �� (/91 lf aa W ! LAZ pair ow 0 - p --- Pair G — a a Pair per 417 PW TWO • ' C io TS 0 o 0 So orciA�' t►O o�: y A S s 612 1 `/o b 50 Pair ISO o o 0 - A,� 5'p,�a 3 N 0" pe ! o 0 0 N T1 ►q�G .. ., 2 % SCHEDULE S / REAL ESTATE OWNED Oescr>ptron of Property ltiar b Purchase prce Msund Mortgage Balance Date of Maturity Repayn+erit Terrns current Martiet H�krt o« p« � pair ow 0 - p --- Pair G — a a Pair per 417 TWO • ' ti. rh ► So orciA�' t►O o�: y A S L---. L- l f 1 `/o b 50 o alp Der ISO o o 0 N pe ! o 0 0 N T1 ►q�G .. ., 2 % /Oo oe o00 warn AALA f � • mow° -rw• •° r �° . �•uA�i� flu A r% r ns C t1i tc 07 S a �7Lf7GYY�.� v 1 f7w1v ". . r.vw. •wv • �•+ �. -- -- Name of C"Mmor - -- - -- Collateral Dos a Mataty Eiepay+nw�t Teens Balance Due f �I • o« p« � pair Pair - p --- Pair PW p ova per 417 TWO • p+r L---. L- l f � 00& yZ.,o• Nam. of Eon+par+y TOMIG D Der p« Pair - p --- PW POW TWO • The undersigned certify that the information provided by this statement is true and correct. So long as the undersigned owe any sums tc the Bank, the undersigned agree to give the Bank prompt written notice of any material change in the undersigneds' financial conditici i The Bank is authorized to retain this personal financial statement whether or not credit is approved and is further authorized to verify tt.t understgneds' credit and employment history or any other inform ion contained herein. App+scarn s S"ture ` Oats Co- AMIocant s Sgnature . r F NAME 1 AOORLSS C i t y TELEPHONE D OBERT S. SNYDER 28fi5 Mdp]eWnnd Rd. Way7ata MN (612) 47 �1JifNESS ACOcESfb OTT TEL•ERHONE fee tae purpose N pocutme .no aslaprtshrnI trallf troop lithe to bmw with "W the wadruttne/ furn1ahfts the follovral Intermebeft Itndmiling !M osta oa tM re.e•se aids n.rr . bee re Nesenu and Watteau that sort tnfeirrtaoraa N 0 true and Lemplete 6100"tent of the l+rrattal saa/ltron of the underulne/ on the 1st DAY OF f? 1987 WETS AMOUNT LIABILITIES A «aunt► Parable• AM© UNT • 2 100Q Cash to Hank ay i ng & r bar i na Cash In either hinkl (Dviall 1 i`i +te • 1'arahll 2 Iona Com mission j2ue nrtf piv ahlt S evolving LinelCr 44 Amount% Recrivahle --- G(iod P.lrahle III lntilvtdualo - 1`ntes Resctvah1v — Gtm) securuv Interem', lef&A+t:&#e.age Ctraiiel Mon a es. etc t Merchandise _ Incnmr Tax Pat•ahlu L lstrd Smtlrltl (Item) :c on Rever•r) Other 1 - nnaid Trim and lnter"t - TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS A ag n 00 Other bibilitles linitltri..' Securities (Itemise on Reverse) Installment Car Loan. 12 4 Real E state 111des .See attached 6 6 70 286 00 Mftrtcaees be Trust Deeds — Ist Mortcaces do Trutt Det-is — 2nd TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 6 01 4 00 Automobiles NItlrtcacec t a r Lfrm on Rr21 E state 3 37 000 Due tram Relatives I.nans Piv ihlr after unr vt:ar Cash Surrender Value — Life Insurance Imam un Lift- Imurance• Other A tptets Ho u eho l d 100 C ars Boals 50 000 00 TOTAL LIAMU'r1ES 397 1 4 0 t; NET WORTH t 1 1 1 7 TO TAL - 00 - TOTAL 909, 17 ANNUAL INCOME ANNVAL EXPENDITURES f Saiar,• 1986 Act. Earned Inc. S 150, 000.00 s Securtttes S \I.irtcact• 1'm-nit•nt .tnd lntvrt• c , 0 • Rentals Received S Other Catntrict PAvint•nl, 27 9 000 - - Business S Insurance ar 5 1 e 1 t 0 7 - ; Other Income Non Cash 1986 s 2,951,000-00 R ent S Est. 1987: Wages, ect. 200,000 (hhe� c 1tILCf aZoto L7:r,000J I TOTAL INCOME S 495 9 000 . 00 TOTAL FXPEIDITI'RF.S c What was vour full {J - r tai on l•ami to ittairmirtil d:ett•- S 0 11111Vh N.r♦ 11.1191 ern f01111.11111 r1•111M% fit tt tle"'wnI CIA# - Fixed Leasehold oblicatlnns S - N/ L - ,• %VI1r, itr ti•1 cl 1 rnlr tlrtti•tmr• t.1 we- mm ,, __ What .odditional last-%. tf an%. art• claimed h. thr Fp , 4# -r..l ti t stale- Gtnrrimictits' None Conuneent Liabiburs (Lnoorsements Guarantres. Suits. etc. 1 — Too M•hism • n } Tasrs on heal Estate ant!. other Nrentem paid tit whit Hair, 11/1/86 Are ve.0 a parmpr to any fim , Lxpl.itr. Litr Insurancvl f 1 it twin chi I r 1re n 1 w if n Alm- Lsah111r. Imuran• Frwitr� 111111n a 1'r,mr rte 11.1rr1.1r• - c. G ' It ;. a &DOwIID41. LAOAL 6911C111rT1014 AND TTPa Or •YIL01046 tp�� •MO O��I�at1�T1014 �At�twT YpwTwLT �10ATObOa• income OUT. Nava YAw14aA Or PAVOINT afOwTO &Ois �..,, -2316 Lafayette Rd. Land 50 000 850 80,000 mo 2010 1st Fed Wayal 8uildl 1351,000 60 000 14 mo 5 he lar d A of Bid# Yr of Purc De preciation N/A Parr Insurance = NET VAL'N J 6-5 OQO Land 1 00 1 mo 1989 Rizer Wa MN- Building 2 50,000 — Age of Blds_.__.___Yr. of Purchas Depreciation N/A Pam Insurance : 300, 000 NET VAL'N 350,000 ai 1 Run Resort Land TSO 51/ Building 309000 Age of Bldg S h — Yr. of Purchas Depreciation Fire insurance = NET VAL'N A Lind ' Building Alte of Bldg —Yr. of Purctmob Depreciation Fire Insurance = NET VAL'N s frnm attached sheet Land net e Building 6 ., 12 S - 28 6 Afire of Bldg Yr. of Purchase Depreciation Fire Insurance = NET VAL - N d Land Building Age of Bidg..._...._Yr. of Purchase Depreciation Fire Insurance = NET VAL'N 7 Land ' Building .� Ante of Bldg —Yr. of Purchase. Depreciation Fire Insurance S NET VAL'N e Land Building _ Age of Bldg—Yr. of Purchas Derreciation _._. Fire Insurance s NET VA:.W GRAND TOTAL 8 3 . Title to Number i above recorded in name of RSIDD Sn Describe fully all mortgages and trust deeds owned b5 Title to Number 2 above recorded in name of RSjnD Sn see attached li sting Title to Number 3 above recorded in name of Title to Number 4 above recorded in name of Title to Number S above recorded in tame of c1 Describe fully all leases cabling Tour sianatute u Ir_ Title to Number 6 above recorded in name of va se g armtor: lease t o Tr 1 Sta . Title tc Number 7 above recorded in name of ..Hotels , I . ' - 400 S . ft • Title to Number 6 above recorded in name of office Minneap S1 600/ Are all taxes vaid to date ? gross until '/ 90 If am• Real Estate has been homesteaded. indicate parcel b%• number STOCKS. BONDS AND INVESTMENTS ItaSUED TO Oq STANDING iN NAME of rAnr�lr -u��r Kure ...n �nun� ���wrn ure�u taranrr�t:. ao or 90140. OR 6"Awas or •TOGK FULL DESCRIPTION WNEnE LISTED? ISTA19 OF UNLIaT901 poesa14T wAnney bALu Pr operties. Inc. Purchase Price unlisted 5,000 _ 00 Cred it - Ass oc. Central Florida NYSE 8 1 , II '0 1 . LARG ACCOUNTS PAYABLE as of date of this statement arc: 3. i �. Visa = 1.,000 approx.. _ 2 Masterchar e j 1,000 approx. — _ REAL ESTATE AND FINANCIAL PAPER EQUITY SUMMARY ROBERT'S. SNYDER I. REAL ESTATE OWNED $ 257,890 II. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS 1 III. MORTGAGES OWNED 2,783,760 IV. DEFERRED COMMISSIONS 1,773,156 $ 6,125,286 V. POTENTIAL (CONTINGENT) COMMISSION 775,000 TOTAL $ 6,900,286 A Of ISSUE DATE (MM /DDNY) 7 - 2+2 -8(7. PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, John H. Crowther Inc. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 3600 Multifoods'Tower 33 S. 6th St. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE ' Mpls., MN : .55+02 COMPANY A LETTER- Transcontinental COMPANY B INSURED LETTER Maplewood Hotel Corporation COMPANY DB'A: Maplewood Days Inn LETTER C i .13911 Ridgedale Dr., #249 COMPANY D Mt k a., MN .' 55343 LETTER COMPANY E LETTER Y THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOU1REMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MMIDD/YY) DATE (MM/DDNY) EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL LIABILITY BODILY COMPREHENSIVE I" INJURY $ $ PREMISES/OPERATIONS P UNDERGROUND DAMAGE $ $ EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE HAZARD PRODUCTSJCOMPLETED OPERATIONS CONTRACTUAL BI a PD COMBINED $ $ INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS k. BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE z PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $ M AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BOOT :Y ANY AUTO INJURY (PER PERSON) >t• ALL OWNED AUTOS (PRIV. PASS.) eoOl :v ALL OWNED AUTOS OTHER THAN INJq Y DENT, $ x 4 PRIV. PASS. J HIRED AUTOS PROPERTY NON -OWNED AUTOS DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY ' BI 6 PD � COMBINED $ " EXCESS LIABILITY ?� ., UMBRELLA FORM coMS°,ED $ $ r n OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM r STATUTORY • n, WORKERS' COMPENSATION $ (EACH ACCIDENT) AND $ (DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT) EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY $ (DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER A Liquor Liability CCP 180 41 .45 7- 1 -87 1 -1 -88 See Below $1,000 S P001 B ea ch erson DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS /LOCATIONSNEHICLES /SPECIAL ITE 1 B I each common cause � Location: 1780 E. Cty, Rd. D* $1 PD each common cause Maplewood,. MN X1,000,000 Loss of means of support each commo z' City of Maplewood SHOULD ANY OF THE A DOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- 1830 E . Ct y . R d . B PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE c r Maplewood, MN .'55109 LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY O THE C MPAN ITS AGE TS R REP ESE TATIVES. AUTH I7,F,Q, „P .. N E CO W � r �''"�'' .0 � , � c s ha fth °il' s imam 4 0 September 28, 1987 Ms. Lucille Aurelius City Clerk City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Lucille: Per our conversation, please be advised that the following is the information you requested. Names, addresses and birthdates of the shareholders other than Deborah Snyder are as follows: Ronald Lee Ringling SSN # 479 -50 -1320 4238 Crocker Avenue Birthdate 1 -11 -40 Edina, Minnesota 55435 Delvin Dean Junker SSN # 474 -28 -9588 Route 8, Box 60 Birthdate 5 -13 -30 Brainerd, Minnesota 56401 Robert Stephen Snyder SSN # 522 -60 -3165 2865 Mapelwood Road Birthdate 11 -25 -46 Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Attached you find affadavits of Ronald Ringling and Robert Snyder. Del Junker's affadavit, in the same format, will be sent to you directly from Brainerd. If you have any other questions you can contact me at the hotel. The number is 770 -2811. , Wit best regards, ROB RT S. "TR P" SNYDER RS : lkc MAPLEWOOD HOTEL CORPORATION DBA Days Inn - St. Paul /Maplewood Mall 1780 East County Road D • Maplewood, Minnesota 55109.612/770 -2811 r AFFADAVIT DELVIN DEAN JUNKER, being first duly sworn,.swears as to the following: 1. He is an officer and shareholder of MAPLEV100D HOTEL CORPORATION, INC. 2. He does not now have any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota. 3. This statement is made in conjunction with the application of Deborah Dorrian Snyder for an Intoxicating Liquor license for the property currently known as the Maplewood Holiday inn which will become known as the Days Inn - St. Paul /Maplewood Mall on or about November 1, 1987: Further your affiant sayeth not. Dated this d� day of , 1987. �--� mac/ � �-J State of Mi a County of , /9 S this - day f C , .1987, v Y j cc pt� appeared before me and acknowledged his signature above to be by his own hand and will. e(eJ NOTARY P IC IOU cAfifende7 -:' „;.- ` s • NOTA ' MOM — MINNESOTA r .r,4.... RAM E Y S COUNTY {�•lr�$1• My commission expires 11 -25 -91 AFFADAVIT RONALD LEE RINGLING, being first duly sworn, swears as to the following: 1.. He is an officer and shareholder of MAPLEWOOD HOTEL CORPORATION, INC. 2. He does not now have any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of"Minnesota. 3. This statement is made in conjunction with the application of Deborah Dorrian Snyder for an Intoxicating Liquor License for the property currently known as the Maplewood Holiday Inn which will become known as the Days Inn - St.-Paul/Maplewood Mall on or about November 1, 1987. Further your affiant sayeth not. Dated this � � day of 1987 4 State of Minn County of A� / J.r - A .� a this - - da f C�, 1987 e t o b_= L_ y � , iv appeared before me and acknowledged his signature above to be by his own hand and will. t NOTARY PLIDLIC ��► .' f L OU c ( Ci ''" "'Q2� t eR e7 "Zt••►; NOTAXY ►UsLIC —MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY My commission exp ires 11 -25 -91 ..y ,; tip: ;r • � � ..r,; , . . t R 11 AFFADAVIT ROBERT STEPHEN SNYDER, being first duly sworn, swears as to the following: 1. He is an officer and shareholder of MAPLEV400D HOTEL CORPORATION, INC. 2. He does not now have any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota. 3. This statement is made in conjunction with the application of Deborah Dorrian Snyder for an Intoxicating Liquor License for the property currently known as the Maplewood Holiday Inn which will become known as the Days Inn - St. Paul /Maplewood Mall on about November 1, 19870 Further your affiant sayeth not. Dated this � A45( day of ����tc11 � State of Minn County of O N S e On this day of , 1987 . - �,q Iappeared before me and acknowledged his signature above to be by his own hand and will.. NOTARY PUBIC CAI L?zy f cMi ref2dez NOTARY PUILIC - M{NrIESOTA RAMS COUNTY my commission expires 11.25•y1 r y CITY OF -A Z.7 MAPI EWOOD 1830 EAST CO. ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 w , DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE. 612-770-4530 September 24, 1987 Chief Ralph Hi tchens Brainerd Police Department Law Enforcement Center. 304 Laurel Street Brainerd, MN 56401 Dear Chief Hi tchens: The following persons have, applied for a liquor license in the City of .Maplewood: NAME DATE OF BIRTH Deborah Dorrian Snyder 09 -26 -52 Ronald Lee Ri ngl i ng 01 -11 -40 Robert Stephen Snyder 11 -25 -46 Delvin Dean Junker 05 -13 -30 We would appreciate it if you would check your records for any and all contacts you may have had.with these individuals (including ownership in. any establishment serving liquor). .Thank you for your attention to this matter. i Very truly yours, Kenneth V. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department KVC: js cc L.i quor F i l e City Clerk 87-012139 CITY rJ� AA EW0.0 P IL-A 1830 EAST CO. ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNES(7TA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE 612 -770 -4530 September 24, 1987 •1 SEP 9 9 . l98 7 Department of Public Safety State of Minnesota '�.�, - Liquor Control Di pa�� ... 333 Sibley Street ° St. Paul, MN 55101 Gentlemen: The following persons have applied for a liquor license in the City of Maplewood: NAME DATE OF BIRTH Deborah Dorrian Snyder 09 -26 -52 Ronald Lee Ringl.ing 01 -11 -40 Robert Stephen Snyder 11 -25 -46 Delvin Dean Junker 05 -13 -30 We would appreciate it if you would check your records for any and all contacts you may have had with these individuals (including ownership in any establishment serving li quor). Thank you for your attention to this matter. Y Very truly yours, enneth V.. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department KVC:js cc Liquor File r City Clerk 87- 012139 AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth v. Collins Subject: Application For Liquor License Date: December 7, 1987 ,j`.l,, ;f ,1 ... �F.,J .. .��. .�.i 1•J `..i �.,1 (...�. .fit✓ O tit . d -i I e RLeliec_ e��,.: Dat e.M ;I�v . .Introduction David M. Ryan made an application for an intoxicating liquor license at 3088 White Bear Avenue. The establishment will be operated under the name Hoof —N— Sipper (formerly Chester's ). Background An investigation has been done on Mr. Ryan, and it has revealed no known contacts with the police, nor can we find that he ,holds a liquor license in any other establishment in the state. Recommendation After a careful background investigation on this individual and a discussion with him, I do not find sufficient reason to deny his application for an intoxicating liquor 1 i cense, Action Required Application for intoxicating liquor license for City Council review and approval or denial. KVC:js cc City Clerw Liquor File 87- 010411 r • September 28, 1987 MEMORANDUM To: City Clerk Lucille Aurelius From: Chief of Police Kenneth V.:. Col 1 i ns ) C/ Subject: Liquor License Application for Chester's Restaurant The background investigation has been nearly c.ompleted'on David Michael. Ryan, who has applied for a liquor license at the above location-. The. only item remaining is a personal interview with the-subject. In view of the fact Mr. Ryan does not wish to obtain a liquor license unti 1 after the first of the year, I will not conduct an interview or complete this .report until a public hearing is set. Please advise me when this is done or if Mr.-Ryan changes his mind. KVC:js cc Liquor Fil� 8T- 010411 CIT O F MAPLEWOOD f7 A ¢� APPLICATION FOR INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as. follows: For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part - nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. - EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED • 1. I, Davi Michael Ryan a s of f ice. (Individual owner, oMcer or partner) for and in behalf of DM Enterprises .% Inc. . _ hereby apply for an _ on Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at ' 3088 white Bear Ave. • Ma lewood MIn. 55109 in the City of (Give address and legal description) Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. Z. Give applicants' date of birth: David Michael Ran 1 June 1948 (Dar) (Month) (Year) 8. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: 4128 15th Ave. So. Minneapolis. Mtn. 55407 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States?- Yes If naturalized state date and place. of naturalization - If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner. 6. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address.._.. -. Applicant unmarried/s ingle .6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years? Li t� a 9"Op ow "*Nxaft Q Oft.... - -••w., t f rrr.rrr..r'•rrwi+_rr — - .1rYr. - '_ -- riirnrr.orrMri.ri - - - - - r��.rrrrrr+rr.�wr. 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner. None If a• corporation, date of incorporatio December 4, .1980 _ state In which Incorporat Minnesota amount of authorized capitalization •10,000.00 amount of paid in capi If a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta t None give purpose of corporatio �.. name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each: David Michael Ran 4128 15th Ave. So. Minneapolis Minneapolis Mn. .55407 (Name) (Addma) (City) The above -- 100% If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this .State? Number of. certificate of authority If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. 8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? Ground S. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? Commercial Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? Yes 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school? No • . State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc _._..____ 11. State name and address of owner of building B ennett Goldberg, 9908 Oak Rid Tra ils Minnetonka., Mn. 55343 ; has owner of building any connection, directly or irt- directly, with applicant? No 12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? No 18. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details No 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; it so, give date and detail No 1 , ww�wMwl_. r. �rgwl. .w1.� I 1. r.�f.rlw�Yiww.rr.w� •w .. 16. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details N° 16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license is to.be Issued? o . If so, in what capacity? 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details No 18. Have applicants any Interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment In the State of Minnesota? N. Give name and address of such establishmen 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer- ence Co nti neat l MI nnesota - 1 09 2ane A - %ze - - N (1- Mi.IlY2e i S - Nhia St. Anthony Nat'l Bank, 2401 Lowry Ave. N.E. St. Anthony, Mn. Norwes t Banks, Maplewood, Mn. 20. Do you possess a retail dealer's Identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 81st of this year? Give number of sam No 21. DoevappIicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? No 22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam - bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therein No 28. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment? .. Y es -- - 24. State trade name to be us ed+ _ oo —N--S . —P9 r- -- 2b. State name of person that will operate store.,._. Na J- D. Ibrahgm 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number - tY 27. If off sale license is bein applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor b vehicle? If Boo state number of motor vehicle permits issued b Liquor Control Commissioner for current year 28. If you are buildin a new buildin for the purposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. 29. Financin of the construction of this building will be as follows: None • 80. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- ment of each partner. 31. Give description of t of operation if this is an on-sale license application ( i.e. whether cock- tail loun nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity b number of customers and an other pertinent data). -Fam:Ll oriented- r servin breakf-ast - lunch and dinner with cocktails available. Seatin capacit 32. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business 'described in the answer to No. 81 above Sole owner of Chester's Famil Restaurant in Owato with li that closed December 31 1983. • 33. Appl]CRnt, and his associates in this application, will strictl comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota g overning the taxation and the sale of intoxicatin li rules and re promulgated by the Li Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereb certify that I have read the foregoing q uestions and hat the answers to said q uestions are true of m own knowledge. (Si of Applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this da of 19_.•__6 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD, ti • ' REPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the applicant, or his. associates named herein have not been convicted with - In the past five years for any violation of Laws of the,' State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as hereinafter stated. MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved by • -- - - Title. REPORT ON PREMISES BY FIRE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the premises herein described have been inspected and that all Laws of the State of Minnesota and Municipal Ordinances relating to Fire Protection. have been complied with. MAPLEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT Approved by: Title. Al 1 . r MF STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEP I N ) i a David M. Ryan, having been first duly sworn and on oath, states and deposes as follows: l That your of f iant is a resident of the City of Minneapolis, County of Hennepin,.and is the sole shareholder, director, and of f i of DMR Enterprises,, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. 2. That DRM Enterprises, Inc*, is engaged in the owner - ship, management, and operation of restaurant facilities in the cities of Roseville and Maplewood, Ramsey Count , Minnesota. . Y 3. That your affiant neither owns, controls, nor has any interest in any partnership, corporation, or other entity which owns or controls any liquor licenses, whether issued by any r municipality, county, or state agency. .49 That DRM Enterprises, Inc., neither owns, controls, nor has any interest in'any partnership, corporation, or other entity which or controls any liquor licenses, whether issued by any municipality, county, or state agency 5. That your- aff rant makes this Affidavit in support of the application of DMR Enterprises, Inc . , for a liquor license to be issued by the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. 6. That your aff iant makes this Affidavit in good faith t and for the purpose set forth herein. Further aff iant sayeth not. t D VID M. RYAN Subscribed nd sworn to before me this day of August, 1987, Notary Public • �► KIM F, gN pERs NOT �N A RY P118t1C � M�NkESO tq NENNEPlN COUNTY UNTY 8+1 Juft OL Im 1 r SECTION I 1 Continued B LIFE INSURANCE Wst only those Polices that you own) Fucot of Cosh Surrender Policy loon fr:. Of her Loanss COMPANY Pal ;c Value • Irnurance Co, Polic asCollat I s . _._... s - _• ..,.__rte._...._. .... ...._. .�._ AFNEFICIAPY TOTALS s $ (Ulm to. 11,110 2i A' CEOI1ni - ri e Awucn I C R..w.l• amol all M-har stnrLe anA Bnni42' F ace Volue -bonds No. of Shores Stock DESCRIPT ION indicate those Not Registered in Your Nome T ype of Ownership COST Mar .et Value U.S. S Goy. Sec. Market Value 1 11'A4617 VA if ' M ktoble Sec. ti,.�iK: Amount Pledged to Secure Loans SECURITY (If Any) When Due Notes Due To Rel. d Friends NotesDue'Othersj nk Not Bo! s s s DNR Enterprises ., ._ . Inc P TOTALS $1 000. s E REAL ESTATE OWNED (Indicate b a ✓ if others h ave an Owners 1 11-W s". 1 lion "I "I"W 1". 1 um 141 hi Interest) TITLE IN NAME OF Description b location P Date Acq uired Original Cost Present Value of Real Estate Amount of iris. Carried _MORT go OR CONTRACT a ment Mo� to PAYABLE o W porn oyo�1t ni Hoesteod- S $ TOTALS Ls e . o. I.■■.w M.. as • 1. .�... . .w+ �� • j.w.wr A� A. 11■"w ■aIF D NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (Money Payable or Owed t You Individually - Indicate y a ✓lf Others have a Ownership Interest MAKER /DEBTOR ✓ When Due Original Am't 10 8 °lance Due .good Accounts Balance Due Doubtful Acc is Sol. Due Notes Rel. d. Friends SECURITY (If Any) When Due Notes Due To Rel. d Friends NotesDue'Othersj nk Not Bo! s s s s DNR Enterprises ., ._ . Inc P TOTALS $1 000. s E REAL ESTATE OWNED (Indicate b a ✓ if others h ave an Owners 1 11-W s". 1 lion "I "I"W 1". 1 um 141 hi Interest) TITLE IN NAME OF Description b location P Date Acq uired Original Cost Present Value of Real Estate Amount of iris. Carried _MORT go OR CONTRACT a ment Mo� to PAYABLE o W porn oyo�1t ni Hoesteod- S $ Dav i Ran$ -� t e . o. _ s .__._ 9�5 9.,�5Q _. _ 9 _ 534. _.._ . F ouble. -Bun .__ g _ ._ __._ _._ 9 2, 5 0_ _ �. - -- - 4 , 2 _ N�.nne s o tam TOTAL � 5 7 2 2 ��� _ _U" TOTAL 01 • (I"W t«. 1 f It thin. $a. 1 1,1" 341, F MORTGAGhS AND CONTRACTS OWNED (Indicato by a ✓ if Other• have an Ownership Interest) Cont. Mfg*. 0 __ _ - r , - ; . . _._....._...._._ _.._ _ ..�: PRO COVERED tODc�eg Payment Maturity Balance Due i 0 r s s s TOTAL • G PERSONAL PROPERTY (Indicate by a ✓ it Others have an Ownershi p interest) t ``' :" ' ' UM I n DESCRIPTION Dote When New Cost When New Value Toda LOANS ON PR ERTY ^'T a eve _ � ._ o .... Po .. ale ._____.. A.ut,mabiws- Ca as _ S s _�_ _0000 _ 03 c s nin 1977- � . She le t P ickup _ 1976 2 000. JgRelr�.u m isc. .0.0.00_...___ _4� _ ..- O �. TOTAL 4� QO_ L''`-•!:_ 2112.- , &. �N E Other then Banc Mortgage and Insurance CofflE Loans ACCOUNTS AND BILLS AND CONTRACTS PAYABLE . PAYABLE TO Other i ors If An When Due Notes Due To Rel. d Friends NotesDue'Othersj nk Not Bo! Accounts & bills Po ble C ontracts Po obie COLLA TERAL (If An y) f TOTALS �A.A ice.■ • ....t f t / '0 w.. ■ www _. I . � R. �.. ■ ..� ■■-■ . mow. .._.. . _.- __ For the purpose of procuring credit from time to time, IMe furnish the foregng as o true and accurate statement of my, /our financial condition. Au ►hotitotionis hereby given to the Lender to verify in any manner it deems appropriate any and all items indicated on this statement. The under- signed also o ee: 1,c, ratify the lender Immediately in writi gro odvr a in such financial condition. Dote Signed _.. ,�_19_e Signature ._._ ____..._.. ..._.___.. _._.... Signature_.___._. 9 -- - -- �tt;�l�. Pew► � /�►plK�bit� Y. ���... �• .+..q.s - EMI... MI_w.r..�_.-.....�.....r1..._r/ M •.IH...... • .NY.e._.. _. _lr..�•M .... -. M► . ♦ ..F.1 ......rr.r... .. • . .Y --1.. •.. . .a. ...1..a __ ..- _.1.. 1... ._.__. M � N .-.. • • __._....r._._...... ..._......_O.r.- ilk_ "YPE Of CREDIT CHECK THE APPROPRIATE SOX (Nome of lender) Individual -- If yuu check this box, provide Financial Information only about yourself. Joint, with __,.____.. Relationship - - if you check this box, provide Fi nancial Information obovt yowsolf ond.the other person. PERSONAL. FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF NOTE: Any willful misrepresentation could result in a violation of Federal Low (Sec. 18 U. S.C. 1014) firth ,Tune 12 8 June 24 19 87 ,me Tavid Michael. Ran 19�'_____Statement Date o Minna 9li tat JAN 55407 Social Sec. No 470 -56 -5368 %ddres= 412 8 15th Ave e S . Cit P . _ Ss e�z 5 e ; n Restaurant (timer Bus. Phone -6125 fart Phone o. o g 2 7 528 S Nf Dependents .gus. or Occupot o MOTE: Complete all of Section 11 BEFORE Uclion I A S S I T S i Cosh On Hand a 'in donks Sec. 11 -A rh«r+.W+ ►+,..looAl 02 coal$ . L I A B I L I T 1 V S t �_s P ut 12 8ar„ Se - r*.r.«w "W6600 Can" ----- 2 Cash Volvo of Life Insurance Sec 11 -8 .3 V -.S. Gov. Securities_ { -�_ i ncl. a in a OvF . Ili.so>1. 4W 0*041 . W se►«�• �sewa wce h"eme need not w revee� a _ � — Mortgage Payments._._y 22 Notes Due to Relatives & Friends_ Sec. II -H _23 Notes Due to Others _- Sec. 11 -H 24 Accounts & bi lls Po oar bole Sec. 11 -H _?5 UnQ_i_d Taxes Due - �Federol — ❑ State incl. in 8 o *ens do wN W" h %"a k « • rests for reHyMy tug e10900". S _ _ Other Expenses_ —. ^_ ....... __....___.__. __.._..._. _ 12., 000 q 00 _�e�_1 � 4 Other Morkeabie_ Securities Sec. 11-C 5 Notes 8< Accounts Receivable - ood Sec. i! - _. �.._ _._.__. _. .. M ^Immv, rr s+rt, « Wqp�wl! wnMlewewee 1068+we VM 4sr 00 wbb to So" W eewslisrer es a hook for revefMN d&k 014youe". 6 Other Assets Readily Conv to Cash - Itfmlze i_._ 26 Other U id Taxes b Interest _..___...___............_.__ __.... _..�.._._._..__... _... ._. TOTAL _ _._. ....r_._ S �•{ /�j. UD O AL s J� 27 Looni on lift Insurance Policies Sec, 1 1 - 1- �28 aD,R Enterprises s . Inc* 3 1 0 Contract Accounts P otable Sec. 11 -H 9 29 Cosh Rent Owed .�..Qs__..r.�.l�r_ r RR Nj. ASSETS .._._ 11 Real Estate Owned Sec it -E ,12 Mor „fi cgntr act s Sec. 11- 13 Notes a Accounts Receivable_ - Doubtful M - _ Sec. 11-D 14 No w e From Relatives & Friends �~ Sec. II -D 15 Other Securities - Not Re Morketo Sec. _odilY ble S 11 -C 16 Personal P► rt Sec. II - `. - -_. -- _. _ �� _.. _ _ _ 0 - 30 ' Other liabilities Due within 1 Year - Itemize __._.._ . _ _. _. ....._.______.. 33 . TOTAL CURRENT LIASILIVE5 _ 34 Real Estate Mo+tgoges Potable _ _ Sec. 11 -E_ .35 Liens Assessments ,Potable__ Other Debts - itemize _ ' ��� -- Q As t- Itemize _36 37 -17 .38 Total liabilities 2� L.7 D nterprises, Inc. ..._.._ ---- 39 Net Worth (Total Assets minu Total Liabilities) _ .40 TOTAL LIABILITIES & NET WORTH 1 671 1 64Z- --272, _ __.._ _ 20 - TOTAL ASSETS 67 ,5 0 522 .00 ANNUAL INtoMI ar+AAn OF ArNwru WaOU Salary, Bonuses d Commissioro s 3 L T .7v e v . Income Taxes __... _ -- - --- - ----- Taxes Real Estate S._ $ - Dividends b Interest -9 - 140 e Rental & lease Income (1`40t) « S Oth _._. Inwronce Premiums � ._i�o_ S i ncl. a in a OvF . Ili.so>1. 4W 0*041 . W se►«�• �sewa wce h"eme need not w revee� a _ � — Mortgage Payments._._y incl. in 8 o *ens do wN W" h %"a k « • rests for reHyMy tug e10900". S ._. .�.._ ..._.._._-- ..._..._.._. Rent Pale__._...._.._...._ Other Income -- Itemize _. _.._.____... -__. -_ Provide the following information only if Joint Credit is checked above. Other Expenses_ —. ^_ ....... __....___.__. __.._..._. s 12., 000 q 00 Other Person$ Solar , Sorwses & Commissions S _.._ _. �.._ _._.__. _. .. S_.._ ^Immv, rr s+rt, « Wqp�wl! wnMlewewee 1068+we VM 4sr 00 wbb to So" W eewslisrer es a hook for revefMN d&k 014youe". i_._ O thwOncorne of 0 Person— Itemire S 64 _..___...___............_.__ __.... _..�.._._._..__... _... ._. TOTAL _ _._. ....r_._ S �•{ /�j. UD O AL s J� 00141 W44MofT LIAMIL"M . Assets Ple ? No ❑ Yes See Sect ion II) -- As Endorser, Co -moker or Guarantor _-- ..� --- .,,ece m a Dtkadwt In gnx 5vin 4i -tegai Actions? s No 0 Yes On leases or Contracts Le 1 C laims M ._. - ._n......__..... .... _. _.`_��. may..._.._. Move m ever been declared bankrupt in the lost 14 years? I0 No Yes Federal - Stole Income Taxes tE�lein�f Other - s SECTION 11 l CASH IN BANKS AND NOTES DUE TO BANKS (Us* all Real Estate Loans in Section 11 -E) NAME OF BANK Type of Account Type of Ownership On Deposit Notes Due banks t thont Nat t! 8k l Checki In ivf e, s 2 0e _. 19 0 "OUD (Cwn0e% Rest of Section 11 on Ravara Side) Cosh on Mond s ..._._... - -- 22 - TOTALS . COLLATERAL (If Any) & Type of Ownership J w , CITY OF PLEWOOD i 1 1 J 1830 EAST CO. ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - OFFICE OF CHIEF OF POLICE 612-770-4530 August 20, 1987 Chief James D. Zel i nsky Roseville Police Department 2660 Civic Center Drive .Roseville, MN 55113 Dear Chief Zel i nsky: The individual listed below has applied for a liquor 1 i cense in the City of Maplewood. David Michael Ryan DOB 6 -12 -48 4128 15th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 We have information that he owns or owned a restaurant in the City of Roseville under the name of DMR Enterprises, Inc. We would be interested in knowing whether any liquor licenses have been issued under the name David Michael Ryan or DMR Enterprises, Inc,, or whether any liquor viola— tions have taken place under either of those 'names. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very tr ly yours, K nneth V. Collins, Chief of Police Maplewood Police Department KVC: js cc City Clerk Liquor F i 1 e 87- 010411. r3 MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City rsanager Director of Community Development Metal Storage Buildings November 17, 1987 Endo A 1 - m Pea e t LCh Council approved an ordinance on November 9 to allow metal storage buildings in an M -1, light manufacturing zone. Council also gave first reading to allowing metal storage buildings in BC, business commercial zones by conditional use permit. Recommendation Adopt the attached ordinance. kd Attachments 1. Ordinance 2. Letter 3. Survey ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING METAL STORAGE BUILDINGS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 9 -6 (a), metal pole buildings, are amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Sec. 9 -6 Metal storage buildings. (a) It shall be unlawful to erect a metal storage building in the city which is of a design commonly referred to as a "pole barn" or "agr i- building" , unless such building_ 1) wo.uld be located in a F, farm residence district, 2) 4-9- be a metal storage building commonly used as a back yard storage shed, 3 ) Is- would be located in a M -1, light manufacturing or M- 2, heavy manufacturing district and -i-e- would be substantially screened so as to be 80% opaque as viewed from residentially -zoned land or streets. If the screening is removed or dies and is not replaced, the city council may require removal of the building. If the value of the building exceeds $25,000, the city council shall allow at least a five -year amortization period, or 4) would be located in a BC, business commercial district and approved with a conditional use permit as required in Section 36 -153 ( 2 ) ( f ) Section 2. Section 36 -153 (2) is amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out):' (2.) gf- ec -i-a- exe i-e-as Conditional uses: The following uses are allowed when authorized by the city council as a s e - i-a -l-- a -xe -a- conditional use: (a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts. -eLe --tom (b) Processing and distributing station for milk or other beverages, carting or hauling station. (c) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater, when c t - erg conducted indoors, (d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of ice, coal, fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard. 2 Attachment 1 (e) Used car lot. (f) Metal storage buildings, provided that in addition to the general findings required for a conditional use, the following additional findings must be made: 1) The building would be substantially screened so a to be 8�% opaque as viewed from streets or residen zoned land. 2 ) The . bui ld in would not be of lesser qualit than surrounding development. If the screening is removed or dies and is not replaced, the city council may require removal of the building. If the value of the building exceeds $25,000, the ci t counci 1 shall allow at least a five -year amortization period. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1987 Attest: Mayor City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- 3 ff L r October lb,. 1987 City of Maplewood _ Geoff Olson, AICP Director of Community Development 1830 East County Road B. Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: re I own and operate an auto body air business in the Mpalewood area P and would like to construct a metal structual building behind my present location. The metal building would be used to store auto parts and vehicles which are currently being stored outside and are targets r vandalism. The metal building would be located behind of theft and/or my present shop in a commercial area and would not be visible from the street or the neighboring residential area. I understand that before this type of construction can be approved, the Busines s / Commercial code sections must be amended. I would like to work with Y ou and the City of Maplewood to obtain the necessary approvals. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. I would very m uch like to start construction in 1987 and would appreciate any recommendations you may have. Sincerely,. 1. v George M. Hirsch c/o Georges Body Shop 1225 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 4 Attachment 2 a SURVEY 2 Do you have any special restrictions on metal buildings? Coon Rapids No ordinance, but. reviewed by the planning commission Roseville Burnsville Plymouth Brooklyn Center" " " if of of of 't 2 Fridley No ordinance .Blaine Yes, restricted to farm zones Crystal No ordinance New Brighton of " Golden Valley Yes, metal buildings not allowed Apple Valle No ordinance, but reviewed by the planning commission Valley So. St. Paul No ordinance, allowed in industrial districts by the planning commission Columbia Hg ts. No ordinance Cottage Grove Yes, restricted to farm zones Shoreview No ordinance, but reviewed by the planning commission Oakdale No ordinance Woodbury Little Canada Restricted to light industrial. Vadna i s Hg is . of St. Paul No ordinance Attachment 3 7 it Community Design Review Board - 3 - Minutes 11 -24 -87 13. Approval o drainage, uti 1 ity, grading and erosion control plans by the ci ngi veer. These plan shall include, but not be 1 i mi ted to const ucti on of on -site torm sewer. If the site will drain south, a and must be inc uded in the southeast corner of the site and an ou let pipe fro the pond to the storm sewer pipe in Lydi Avenue. 14. The driveways shall be po ted for "No Parking - -Fire Lane ". 15. Submittal of a l ette credit and developers ag reement for: a. The restoration o ood l ynn Avenue. b. The pond and utlet ipe, if needed. 16. The west north/ outh drive ay shall be named "Frederick Lane" and the east north/ outh drivewa shall be named "Beebe Lane ". The names of the cent driveway vi s� bl e from he driveways. The 1 oc ti on and size of the and the east /west driveway shall, be approved by the i rector of publ i safety. 17. The addre s for each of the un 'ts shall be posted to be readily • � numerals shall be app oved by the director of ublis safety. 18.. Provi a concrete curbing as requi r d by city code. 19. / improvements applicant shall provide a moneta guarantee, in a form acce e to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any that are not compl by occupancy. Boar ber Kochsiek seconded Ayes - -a 1 B. Ordinance - -Metal Storage Buildings Board Member Marlow moved the board recommend adoption of the ordinance to a 11 metal storage buildings in an M- 1, l ight manufacturing zone, and g also in BC, business commercial zones by conditional use permit. Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes- -all UII. VI TOR PRE NTATIONS VIII. BOARD RES NTATIONS IX. STAFF P SENTATIONS X. ADJOU MEN Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. i 0 E.. ORDINANCE NO, y L '�' " v Providing for applications for installment payments of charges due to hardship. Section 35 -26 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is to add the following language: "Section 35 -26. Applications for Installment Payments Due to Hardship. Any person financially unable to pay a cash connection charge may make application to the City Manager to provide for installment payments for such connection charge. Such application shall include the following information: 1. Name and address of applicant; 2. Owner and legal description of subject property; 3. Reason and proof of financial hardship of applicant. 4. A copy of the most recent income tax return; 50 A sworn financial statement showing all assets, liabilities, sources of income and expenses. If the. ' : Manager finds suf f icient f inancial hardship to the applicant,:. the Manager may provide for payments of such charge in annual installments for a period not to exceed five years, and collectable with property taxes due on the subject property. The applicant may appeal the Manager's decision to the City Council," Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , .1987. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk S i �r MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment- Townhouses DATE: October 27, 1987 Introduction i J . +t o Staff i s recommending that the following changes be made to the requirements for townhouses: 19 Delete the minimum lot area requirements. 2. Revise the units per structure requirement. 3. Delete the construction requirements. This amendment. is needed by the Cottages of Maplewood senior project proposed on Woodlynn Avenue. Background Mini Lot A rea The minimum lot area requirement is obsolete - it was part of the original zoning code. The city amended the zoning code in 1978 to regulate the maximum density based on the city land use plan. Units Per Structure This requirement was intended to avoid a "row house" appearance and limit the spread of fire. Staff is recommending a revision to allow the community design review board to. approve more units per structure if the design is varied enough to avoid a "row house" appearance. There is no requirement in the Uniform Building Code or Uniform Fire Code that restricts townhouse structures to eight units. Construction Requirements These requirements are superceded by the State Building Code and cannot be enforced. Recommendation Approve the attached ordinance. kd -% . 1 1- ORDINANCE N0. An ordinance revising the requirements for townhouse units. Section 1. Section 36 -124 (2) is amended as follows (additions underlined and . deletions crossed out) : (2 ) Dwelling units for each structure and density. area .arid -f..i r_e- r-e q u-i rrefne-n t-s ; " -n& -to-wr-h a us a -s t r t*c*. u-r e -s - -ce n6 t-r -u at ed- i-n -the- c -i -t Y- &n-- a-n -a-rea -off -land -1 es-s -then -f au-r -th-o�u sa ftd- (-4 r -09 0� -sq u-a r-e- feet- P�e r - dwel -li-ng - urti -t.- No more than eight (8) dwelling units shall be included in a single structure, unless the community design review board finds that the design is varied enough t0 avoid a "row house" appearance, w i - t h- -s e a r-a t i en - o-f -ea eh - u-a i - t -by -at- -lea ene -h au-r -f i r 4R ra*. ed - m-a t-e r-i-a 1- and,, -w i•th -e y- see o-nd d iry i d-i n-g -w,a 1 -1 -be i-ng eo-n st-r uc t-ed &f- at -l-e a-s t a - two - -hour- f -i r-e- rated tenet -e r -i al- that- e-x t-e-nd6 -two- { 24 -f ee t abe v-e -the- rzoe f- and - �-2 y -f -e ut - f-r ova -the- f re n-t -a-nd- laae k- wa 1-. s - . The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 1987. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- Planning Commission — 2 — Minutes 11 -16 -87 V. P LIC HEARINGS A, an Amendment and Rezoning: Century and Highwood (Madland). Dan Madl d (applicant) and.Bill Carver ( rver General Repair) spoke in vor. Rita and Stev Schorr (2660 Highwood Joann Altman and Tim Malaney (2365 Century) bjected on the basi of traffic and preserving the residential char ter of the area. They also felt that changes to the comprehensive plan should not be ade without more notification to residents. Commissioner Fischer mo ed th planning commission recommend: 1. Denial of the land use lan amendment on the basis that: A. There have been o cha ed conditions since the plan was adopted to justify change. B. The property o the west, n th and south is planned for single dwelling . C. The prope y can be developed in ccordance with the land use plan. 2. Denial of a rezoning on the basis that t e rezoning would not be compatible ith the land use plan. Commissione Goins seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Fio Fischer, Goins, if Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten r VI. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS VII. COMMUNICATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Code Amendment: Townhouses The commission 'discussed the need for more objective criteria for the design review board to use in deciding whether a townhouse building with over eight units was varied enough to avoid a "row— house" appearance. Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend approval of the ordinance to ' amend the code amendment for townhouses. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Ayers, Barrett, Fiola, Fischer, Goins, Sigmundik, S1 etten Nays -- Axdahl, Cardinal., Larson J ✓ � a 9 s ikotion r MEMORANDUM. Endor r-d ,�, TO: C i t Mana er �� ecte `����=� - . y g FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT : Code Amendment (Gas Pumps in a BC -M District) APPLICANT: City Staff DATE: December 3, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction Staff is requesting that council amend the BC (M) , business commercial (modified) zoning district to allow gas sales with no more than two pumps on a single island, Background le 4-28-86:. Council moved first reading of an ordinance to amend the BC (M) zoning code to allow motor fuel pumps with convenience stores as a conditional use. 29 5-12-86: Council denied the above amendment . at second reading, Richard Schreier *had requested the amendment for a convenience shopping center at Southlawn Drive and Beam Avenue. His proposal was for two pump islands. 3. 7- 27 -87: Council amended the LSC land use plan designation to allow "gas sales with no vehicle repair or ' maintenance and with no more than two pumps on a single island to service up to four vehicles at one time." 4. Section 473.865, Subdivision 3 of State Statutes states that: "If an official control conflicts with a comprehensive plan as the result of an amendment to the plan, the official control shall be amended by the unit within nine months following the amendment to the plan so as to not conflict with the amended comprehensive plan." Comment: No zoning district that is compatible with the LSC designation allows motor fuel sales. The deadline to amend the zoning code is April, 1988. T) i cr4 Iicc i nn The BC (M) zoning district is the most appropriate district to amend. It is the most intensive of the districts compatible the LSC land use designation. Also, each of the BC (M) districts is planned for LSC use. Recommendation Adopt the ordinance on page 6. REFERENCE Community Services The results of a 25 -city survey regarding the regulation of convenience fuel stations is on page 3. Twenty -two of these 25 cities allow convenience fuel sales in neighborhood commercial districts that abut residential districts, generally by conditional use permit. However, only one of these communities, Coon Rapids, limits the number of pumps, such as proposed for the Maplewood code. Areas Affected A map of the location of each BC (M) zoned parcel that is planned for LSC use is . on page 5 j 1 Attachments 1. Community survey 2. Map of BC (M) property planned for LSC use 3 . Proposed ordinance 2 COMMUNITY SURVEY Regulation of Convenience Shopping with Gas Pumps (No Repair Facilities) Permitted in Neighborhood Shopping Districts Adjacent. to Residential Uses How Regulated Apple Valley .Yes CUP for the pumps Blaine Yes CUP Brooklyn Center Yes Not permitted to abut single dwelling or town house districts. Requires a CUP when abutting other residential uses. Burnsville Yes CUP - -No canopies for pumps in neighborhood convenience shopping centers. Gas must be a secondary use. C o l u m b i a Heights Yes CUP -- Canopy must meet a fifteen—foot front yard setback. Landscaping and screening between pumps and residential uses. Coon Rapids Yes CUP- -Fuel must be a secondary use. A maximum of two pumps per neighborhood center.. Cottage Grove Yes CUP Crystal Yes CUP Eagan No Fridley Yes CUP Golden Valley Yes CUP for the pumps Little Canada Yes CUP - -Pumps must be set back at least twenty feet. Maple Grove No New Brighton Yes CUP -- Canopy must comply with front yard building setback requirements, gas must .be secondary use. New Hope Yes CUP- -Gas must be a secondary use North St. Paul Yes CUP Oakdale Yes Permitted Use. 'Limited to four self — service pumps. 100% opaque, 10 —foot high screening when within 75 feet of abutting residential property. Gas must be a secondary use. 3 Attachment One 0 Permitted in Neighborhood Shopping Districts Adjacent to Residential Uses How Reg ulated Plymouth Yes CUP Roseville Yes CUP Shoreview Yes Permitted Use. Twenty—foot landscaped area and no outside displays: South St. Paul Yes CUP- -Pumps must be screened from residential uses. Vadnais Heights Yes CUP -- Greater setbacks than normal, limit the hours of operation. West St. Paul Yes CUP White Bear Lake Yes CUP 4 W E p • - �-_— _M . _ 1 :.1: 1 — - -- y — : •F R S te - +„� ; !C = — �as�c _' _ • -- _.�__ . ': .' -�_ --`• —_ � s � _. �' N l.0 10,11 OA opt ac Or Beam Avenue �.7F ^/_. Y1 1 - It Jaw- • t I f r _.J or oe YI L. " ti �oC IF Lac a us us Ll 1 M 1 rl i (7lt/GL � Y 1 �• � 1 — - .���"`... +w Y1 �••�- lY' ..1.LJ'C. —. _yi ---- — �\ � Imo` i•� ' an Lk Aj OFF Be cr � 1r DIY if — — �� N s Frost Ave ., �.. j� r' M f; " R 1i � lyrl , I " t f •`; •� �I .�� R IPlA) 4 R ' R �'� +I l J ' f ( i �/, : oC 1 R i F r 1 coo f "3 as 112 f f I 11 3 ST PAM 4J R J f rl 1rua1 f t..�..� Re (� an •. •� 113 +� I ". LLJ Mc 0 q pull �Uuua[ I I< i•- ` R t f �• a -— R L ; 1:. •� ° Lam' -i ICIM u Cri " •�U� . f •1 = �. k •+•...eu. J►t 3M ~I � "� . - - {.�• .Conway Avenue Y! ; Undeveloped Property Zoned. BC(M) and planned for LSC uses 5 Attachment 2 4 N ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOTOR FUEL SALES IN BC (M) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (MODIFIED) ZONING DISTRICTS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -155 (c) , (d) , (3) and (f) . is amended as follows. ( language to be added is underlined and language to be deleted is crossed out) : (c) Sew -i-a -1 Conditional use permit. The following uses may be allowed when authorized by .the city council by means of a spee-i-a-1 conditional use permit. (1) All uses permitted in R -3, Multiple Dwelling Districts, e• a -t - tie --tee ,.�- �� i-es -- - -}� s- e-�m -t-t- - 4- n- -R-- -- and- --2 (2) Laundromat or similar automatic self- service laundry. (3) Restaurant, where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences. (4) Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly, other than a theater, where there are no outdoor activities. (5) Gas sales, with no vehicle repair or maintenance and with no more than two pumps on a single_ i s 1 and . (d) Prohibited uses: (1) Drive -in theaters or drive -in restaurants. (2) Commercial or fee parking lots where such use is the only use of a given parcel or where such use provides for general rather than specific use parking, (3) Uses that involve the exterior storage of equipment, goods or materials. (4) Car wash (5) Public-garage (6) Compressed natural gas or liquid petroleum gas dispensing facilities. (e) Definitions: "Drive -in restaurant" means a restaurant with a drive -up order window or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. 6 Attachment 3 (f) Setback from property zoned residential: 44 e& All buildings or accessory structures, except trash enclosures, but including fuel pump islands and canopies shall have mini , mum side and rear . yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements. (1) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet _ for each one foot the building exceeds twenty -five ( 25) feet in height, (2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially -zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1987. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- 7 Action by Councill.- Endoroed_______ Modified_______ / y Re'J eoted_______' - Date AGENDA ITEM -�--=�-' MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Beam Avenue Water Main, City Project 84-12--Change Order Two DATE: December 7, 1987 The contractor for City Project 84-12, Terra Builders, Inc. has submitted to the project engineer, Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc., documentation in support of the referenced change order. After conferring with city staff, the project enginewwr has recommended approval of Change Order Two in the amount of $26,693.59. BACKGROUND Change Order Two is comprised of several items. An error was made by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. in specifying the correct class of ductile iron pipe in conformance with the governing specification of St" Paul Standards for the Installation of Water Mains The required revision of pipe class (1.e. wall thickness) totaled $15,472.06. An omission was made by Short-Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. in that a bid item for water service trench excavation was not included with the specifications. The labor and equipment required to assist the St. Paul Water Utility with the installation of water service trenches totaled $4,379.65. An omission was made by Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. in not specifying restrained joints for the installation of water main within casing pipe crossing Highway 61 as required by the St. Paul Water Utility when there is not enough space for access by a maintenance worker. Providing restrained joints in lieu of slip joints cost $2,546.55. The balance is primarily comprised of the costs to provide polyethylene wrapping of the water main to prevent corrosion. The need for additional corrosion protection arose from unanticipated soil conditions. This change order does not include costs associated with the inability to insert the 12 inch diameter water main in the existing casing pipe as initially planned. These costs are included within Change Order Four, which is yet to be submitted. RECOMMENDATION The existing. Beam Avenue water main contract is recommended to be modified by acceptance of Change Order Two in the amount of $26,693.59. J ~° �. v RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACOT Wl-iEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 84-12 and has let a coxnstruction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 84-12 Change Order Two. MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Two. On by Cour.cil 0 ` ^ , -� � ���oz�e�_______ I-Aod e�______. Re' ected______� J�2± ABEND�o AGENDA REPORT TOx City Manager' FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Beam Avenue Water Main, City Project 84-12--Change Order Three DATE: December 7, 1987 INTRODUCTION This change order covers the temporary restoration of the west end of Beam Avenue as necessary to allow for winter maintenance of access~ The change order is in the amount of $6 BACKGROUND Due to construction activities primarily associated with the construction of the referenced projectv the existing driving surface of the west end of Beam Avenue significantly deteriorated. The deterioration of the driving surface was not due to the fault of the contractor~ Rather, the road was originally in poor condition that was easily aggravated. To maintain a plowable surface, a temporary overlay was placed as required. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the existing contract be modified by executing Change Order Threell j(s , ° �^ � RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore order made Improvement Project 84-12 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 84-12 Change Order Three,, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPBWOOD MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Three. -1 NORTH ST. PAUL-MAPLEWOOD-OAKDALE SCHOOLS OAPL 'ek -INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622 2055 East Larpenteur Avenue o Maplewood, MN 55109 s ti Action by Coumcil DIV November 30, 1987 Endorsed Modified. 0 Re ected..—.-. Date John Greveau, Maplewood Ma 187 Crestview Drive Maplewood, MN N 55109 Dear Ma Greveau: At the November 19 meetin of the North St. P aul-Maplewood- Oakdale School Board, it was su that a representative from each of the three municipalities serve on the School Boundar Criteria Committee. I am askin y ou to recommend to our office the name of a person who could represent y our municipalit on this committee* Attached is a char statement for this task force. Thank y ou for y our cooperation. Sincerel y ours, Kathleen R Hu Director of Instruction KRH: I z Attachment cc: Dr. St. Germain r r TASK FORCE ON BOUNDARIES CHARGE STATEMENT A. Purposes /Objectives: Al. to to criteria to be used by administration for establishing boundaries. B. Scope of Responsibility: B1. Review boundary issues B2. Provide input from constituencies B3. Develop boundary criteria to be used by administration B4 Recommend boundary criteria to the superintendent C. Level of Authority: Cl. The task force has the authority to recommend boundary criteria to the super . intendent.. D. Communication Linkage: Dl, P Oral report and copy of task force minutes to the executive Council Minutes of meetings distributed to the superintendent, D2. principals and parent advisory co mmittees. D3 P End report to superintendent, executive council, administrative council, and school board. E. Timelines: El. January 6, 1988 E2. Jan. 7 to Feb. 2 E3. February 3 E4. February 11 Initial meeting to review boundary issues Gain inpVt on boundary issues from constituents Develop criteria and make recommendations Make presentation of recommenda- tions to School Board if requested F. Results desired: F1 Recommend boundary criteria to superintendent by February 4, 1988 G. Resources needed: Gl. Coffee and rolls for two meetings G2. Duplication costs AGENDA # -� " Action by Counci-IL.-, MEMORANDUM Emdorsed. 0, C E) d.� Date . ...... TO: Ma and Cit Council FROM: Cit Mana RE: Polic on Alcohol /Dru Abuse,'AJ..D,.S4 and Sexual Harassment DATE: December 7, 1987 INTRODUCTION At the last Council meetin there a discussion on Cit Policies relatin to Alcohol/Dru Abuse, A.I.D.S., and Sexual Harassment, There are no formal written pot icies on an of these. 'Nowever, there has been discussion at t-he staff level over the past couple of months.. I have attached information on A.I.D.S.. and Sexual Harassment for your review. ACTION RE Staff will be level o policies and recommended ordinances on Alcohol/ Dru Abuse, A I ' D.S. and Sexual Harassment and will 'keep the Council informed on the status. No action is re at this time. MAM: I n C- �1 l r` c i� s= • r j;. 6' y , r4Z - :x .f "V i fj / A 1. T,y I7g6 . American U.S. Public Red Cross Health Service i:. _.. ,.. \ �.. of ....,,.:v.a, +..r...:.s_i,r.s.: ,.tee ;�.• .,..,c .-:�_ ..+..,;.: .. . � ..,. ......., .. e .'as k a4"K.SuEr`vi.>_ Sl:i%b��.i7j:l+�SJaG - 'w2'3� A:••S:. •• L�.. inlyl 5�3ibGn .x'i�iiia�Lr.:+nl:i= +sRlc4. .•,•'. o � - ✓. tv Z� 4 .. L r 4 4V J A K: j . . t fi . Y: l., A IDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is a frightening disease, but no one should be afraid of catching it at work. AIDS is caused by. a virus* that does not survive well outside the body. The virus is not spread by casual, nonsexual contact. This means that you can't catch AIDS from a cough, a sneeze, a handshake, or a hug. Nor can you catch it from the food you eat, no matter who P repared or served that food. You won't get AIDS by working closely with a coworker who has the disease. Nor will you get it by having coffee, going to lunch, or sharing toilet facilities with that person. careful studies have shown that doctors, nurses, and medical technicians who have taken care of AIDS p atients have not contracted the disease from them. Scientists have not found a single instance in which the AIDS virus has been spread through ordinary nonsexual contact in a family, work, or social setting. AIDS in fact, is a very hard disease to catch. Yet recent surveys have shown that almost one third of the American population believes AIDS can be spread by casual contact, in spite of all scientific evidence to the contrary. Fear of the unknown may help to explain why some people react in this way, since peo- ple tend to fear what they do not understand. The purpose of this brochure is to give you facts about AIDS —facts that can save you needless worry about catching AIDS from coworkers. If Is Spread by Casual Contact, How Does It Spread? The two main ways the AIDS virus is spread are sex- ual contact and sharing of contaminated needles and syringes among users of illegal intravenous (IV) drugs. The virus can also be passed on from infected mothers to their babies during pregnancy, at birth, or shortly after birth (probably through breast milk). In a small number of cases, the virus has been 'Tbe virus that causes AIDS and related disorders has several different names: HTLV - 111, LAY ARY and most recently HI K In this brochure, it is called Wme AIDS virus. spread through blood transfusions and through blood products (clotting factors) used to treat patients with hemophilia and other blood clotting disorders. But today the chances that anyone will get AIDS in this way are extremely small, for these reasons: • Blood collection centers screen donors carefully to prevent people at risk for AIDS from donating blood. • All donated blood is now tested for antibody to the AIDS virus. (Antibodies are substances produced in the blood to fight disease organisms.) When donated blood tests positive for the AIDS antibody, it is discarded; it never enters the blood supply. • Clotting factor products are now heated or treated chemically to destroy the virus. About 98 percent of all AIDS cases reported in this country to date have occurred in the following groups of people: • Sexually active homosexual and bisexual men (or men who have had sex with another man since 1977) (65 percent) • Present or past users of illegal N drugs (17 percent) • Homosexual and bisexual men who are also N drug abusers (8 percent) • Persons who have had transfusions with blood or blood products (2 percent) • Persons with hemophilia or other blood clotting disorders who have received clotting factor prod- ucts (1 percent) • Heterosexual men and women (these include sex partners of persons with AIDS or at risk for AmS, and people born in countries where spread of the virus by heterosexual sex is thought to be more common than in the United States) (4 percent) • Infants born to mothers infected with the AIDS virus 0 percent) About 2 percent of AIDS patients do not fall into any of these groups, but scientists believe that the virus was spread to them in similar ways. Some patients could not be followed up, or died before complete medical histories could be taken. The Virus and Its Effects was first reported in the United States in 1981. AIDS p B Y Se p tember 198 had 6, the Public Health Service received reports of more than 24,000 people w AIDS , 54 percent of whom had died. No one has recovered from the disease. The virus that causes AIDS damages the body's nat- Ural immune defenses against disease and can also infect cells in the brain. People who have AIDS develop unusual, life - threatening illnesses that do not de p affect people with normal immune systems. It is the appearance of these unusual illnesses that makes pos- o of the illnesses most sible the diagnosis of AIDS. Two t , • often seen in AIDS patients are Pneumocystis carznii pneu monia ( a parasitic infection of the lungs) and si's sarcoma (a rare type of cancer) , although gyp° patients may develop other kinds of cancers and infections as well. infection with the AIDS virus does not always lead to AIDS itself. Some infected persons have developed a condition that scientists call "AIDS- related com- lex" (ARC) . Symptoms of ARC include fatigue, ever, p , loss of appetite and weight, d iarrhea night sweats is lymph nodes in the neck, armpits, or and swoll en coin. Anyone with one or more of these symptoms g y for more than two weeks should se e a doctor. fi Public Health Service scientists estimate that 1 to 1 1 /2 • ' on Americans --in addition to those known y; to have AIDS- --have been infected by the AIDS virus and car ry it in their bodies. Many of these persons • know the carry show. no signs of illness and do not y Y • wever, the can read it to others in the the virus, ho Y p { s that have already been explained. The Public ways Health Service has urged persons at high risk for ' infection b the AIDS virus (see box) to consider tak- y t in the test for the AIDS antibody so that, if the test is g P y positive, the can take appropriate action to prevent r further spread of the virus. A p ositive result on the antibody test does not x that a person has AIDS or will necessarily go mean p n to develop DS - related illnesses. It ° p either AIDS or A ted b the does mean that the person has been infec y virus y ca and may be able of transmitting it through - P out his or her lifetime. T: k- x Information about where to get the AIDS antibody test is available from private physicians, health clinics, and state and local health departments. AIDS and YourJob A it should be emphasized that a fellow employee who has AIDS or who carries the AIDS virus does not Po se a danger you. Remember, the - virus is not g er to y spread in the air you breathe or the food you eat; nor is it spread by routine, nonsexual, everyday contact. For workers in general, then, there is no need for worry or special precautions. Following are guide - P lines and answers to some questions that may arise for workers in particular occupations. s Food. Hand1m Because the AIDS virus is not transmitted in food, people who work with food, such as cooks, caterers, waiters, bartenders, airline attendants, and others, should not be restricted from work because they have AIDS or have been infected by the AIDS virus. All food service workers, including those with AIDS, should, of course, observe good personal h 'ene and sanitary food- handling procedures. They should take particular care to avoid injury to their r hands while preparing food. Sanitation guidelines require .that any food that becomes contaminated with blood from a cut be thrown away. Food service workers with AIDS or AIDS virus infection should be restricted from work if have open sores or skin lesions or illnesses for they p .. which any other food handler would also be s restricted. 3' krvice or m pmotwl Beauticians barbers, cosmetologists, electrologists, manicurists, and similar personal service workers { routinely observe procedures that protect them and their clients from bacterial and viral infections. The s risk of spreading the AIDS virus in these settings is t { r t very low, but when instruments that could draw blood are used, sterilizing equipment is important. • Instruments that penetrate the skin, such as ear - piercing iercin devices and needles used for electrolysis, tattooing, and acupuncture, should be discarded after one use, or thoroughly cleaned and disin- fected between uses with a chemical germicide. • The same procedure should be followed for other instruments, such as razors or cuticle scissors. • A personal service worker with open sores or weeping sores should refrain from direct client contact until the wound is healed. All instruments used by personal service workers should be sterilized or disinfected between uses. Information on commercial germicides may be obtained from the Disinfectant Branch, Office of Pes- ticides, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW, Washington, DC 20460. Workers Withjobs Reqult7ng Special Precautions Police personnel, firefighters, emergency medical workers, and prison employees may be exposed to blood or other body fluids of people with AIDS or AIDS - related disorders because of accidents, fires, or violence. Fortunately, by observing a few simple rules, workers can avoid infection. • Avoid wounds from weapons and punctures from hypodermic needles used by drug abusers. Blood on these articles could cause infection. • Use disposable gloves in handling contaminated articles. • Place contaminated articles in a cut -proof evidence bag to be taken to a laboratory for examination or disposal. • Clean up blood spills promptly with freshly diluted household bleach --one part bleach to 10 parts water. • If mouth -to -mouth resuscitation is necessary for a person with AIDS, use an "S- tube" or a hand- operated resuscitator bag. • Wash your hands after exposure to any possible source of infection. Hand washing reduces the chance of spread of infection. • Wear protective masks, gloves, gowns, and shoe coverings, if there is a chance of exposure to blood or other body fluids of someone with AIDS. For More Infomatim 0 0 . More information about AIDS and AIDS-related illnesses can be obtained . f rom— • Your union representative or personnel department. • Your doctor. • Your state or local health department. • The Public Health Service's toll-free hotline: 1- 800 - 342 -AIDS. • Your local chapter of the American Red Cross. Persons at Ind Risk of Infection by the AIDS Virus Persons in the following groups are at increased risk of infection by the AIDS virus: • Homosexual and bisexual men (or men who have had sex with another man since 1977) • People who inject illegal intravenous drugs or who have done so in the past • Persons with symptoms of AIDS or AIDS- related illnesses • Persons from Haiti and Central African coun- tries, where heterosexual transmission is thought to be more common than in - the United States • Male or female prostitutes and their sex partners • Sex partners of persons infected with the AIDS virus or at increased risk of infection • Persons with hemophilia . who have received clotting factor products • Infants of high -risk or infected mothers AIDS -20 woo Oct .1986 TRAINING TERMS q.s Ic n'Li2c Sexual Harassment: Much More Than the Obvious Bzv Ralp Pn . A t first glance, sexual harassment does not seem a difficult con- cept to define. After all, reasonable people know what constitutes of- fensive sexual behavior in the work- place, right? Knowing it's illegal should take care of the problem for all but the most odious perpetrators, shouldn't it? If that were true, the issue wouldn't be causing such headaches for em- ployers. Sexual harassment is an in- Creasing]) complex issue. As court awards and damage amounts in- crease, it's becoming very costly for employers to be unaware of how far beyond the obvious the definition of the term extends. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of sex. How- ever, only since about 1976 have the courts considered sexual harassment to be a form of sex discrimination; in fact, the term was not even widely recognized before then. Most early cases involved supervisors who retal- iated against employees who refused their romantic overtures by firing or not promoting them. Now, the term has evolved to include a broad range of individual behavors and organiza- tional attitudes. • The reason sexual harassment is a major concern for employers —or should be —is that under current inter- pretations of Title VII, an employer is responsible for the discriminatory acts of its supervisory and nonsuper- visory employees. A written policy that explicitly forbids sexual harass- ment will not necessarily protect an employer against liability. In the case of supervisors, an employer can be held liable even if the employer was unaware of the supervisors' acts. That last issue is causing the most organizational consternation these days, although gray areas in the law provide plenty of other pitfalls. The Supreme Court heard arguments in March on its first sexual harassment case. The case is expected to result in a watershed ruling on several sexual harassment issues, employer liability among them. Numerous studies have shown that sexual harassment is far from a mani- festation of 1970s liberal zeal, as some observers have cynically suggested. Sexual harassment is a real issue that affects both men and women. A few examples: Nearly nine out of 10 re- spondents to a 1976 Redbook maga- zine survey said they had been sex- ually harassed at work; in a study conducted by Working Women United, 70% of the respondents said they had been N ictims; and in a two - year study of federal employees con - ducted by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 42% of the women and 15% of the men reported that they had been sexually harassed. Most definitions of sexual harass- ment begin with the Equal Employ- ment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines. As the federal agency charged with enforcing Title VII, the EEOC attempted in 1980 to reconcile conflicting court opinions on the issue* by defining sexual ha- rassment under the law. Although widely distributed, the guidelines ap- parently are still unknown to many employers, and they deserve a spot on every supervisor's wall. The EEOC says: "Unwelcome sexual advances, re- quests for sexual favors, and other verbal and physical conduct of a sex- ual nature constitute sex harassment. when 1) submission to such conduct is made a term or condition of an in- dividual's employment, 2) submis- sion to or rejection of such conduct is used as the basis for employment decisions, or 3) such conduct unrea- sonably interferes with work per- formance, or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environ- ment." Common sense, right? Numbers 1 and 2 say don't hire, fire, reward or assign people based on sexual favors demanded or offered. The legal term is quid pro quo considerations (liter - .ally, "one thing in return for an- other "), and alleged instances of these behaviors form the basis for the ma- jority of harassment cases. But the number of complaints made under Number 3, so -called "hostile environ- ment" cases, is growing. It also ac- counts for increasingly inclusive defi- nitions of sexual harassment. According to some legal interpreta- tions, a "hostile environment" can be created by other employees' sexual in- nuendos, whistling, leering, sexual patter, or casual touching of the sort that comes from people who say they're "just a touchy -feely type." Even if the people toward whom such behavior is directed don't mind it, maybe even participate in it, others around them who don't care for it may, under the EEOC guidelines, have grounds for a sexual harassment complaint. And if a supervisor is nai eted in a complaint, the employer can be liable even though unaware of the alleged harassment. if the complaint names only nonsupervisory workers, the company still may be liable if it knew or should have known about the ha- rassment but didn't take prompt ac- TRAINING 101 J f• wl. w •:� l.. . Y rt �� ..4.. 1 �.• .r � Ct. ) 1.?'J� I� j ', . . ., , -. � a -_ _. .. ,. ...� .. .-� .- . � .. .•.:• < C I T � ti .._y i_ � - �"L�- L.l�• -..1 — � •_y _L • r t ' •" "" YN�i1M�R Customized, Cost - Effective Training /Development Video Modules • Sales Training • Behavior Modeling • Management Training • Role Play Vignettes • Technical Skills • Skill Modules Exciting Computer Animation/Video Graphics Call 1. 800 - 524 -2619 ARKAY VIDEO PRODUCTIONS, INC. 25 Van Zant, E. Norwalk, CT 06855 (203) 8663352 25 So. Main St., Manville, NJ 08835 (201) 5608373 tion to remedy the situation. The extent to which people see their own behavior as harassment varies all over the map, depending on the individual. Sexuality is, of course, present to some degree in virtually every setting where human beings of either (or any) stripe mingle. Depend- ing on the amalgam of individual at- titudes in the workplace, some work- ers may feel that sexually- oriented interchanges are natural or even ex- pected. How many victims of sexual harassment have heard, "What's the matter, can't you take a joke?'.' But the law is not so relaxed about the context in which sexual harass- ment occurs. Often, people named in a complaint are shocked that anyone would consider them sexual ha- rassers. Susan Webb, president of the Seattle -based Pacific Resource De- velopment Group, which helps orga- nizations learn how to prevent sexual harassment, presents the EEOC guide- lines and then adds her own def- inition. "There's a lot of behaN for between what "s inappropriate and what's ille- gal," Webb says. "For instance, there's a lot of `Hi Honey, Hi Toots, Hi Sugar Puss' that drives people nuts." She tells her clients that. sexual harass- ment is also "deliberate and /or re- peated sexual behavior that's not asked for, not welcome and not re- turned. When I say that, eyes open and heads start nodding." Barbara Gutek, author of the re- cently published Se_x and the K brk- place (Jossey -Bass, 1985) confirms that, not surprisingly, men's and women's views on what constitutes sexual harassment are generally quite different. According to her research findings, men tend to see a sexually - oriented remark directed at them as flattering; the majority of women, while believing other women would find it flattering, are insulted. She also found that the more sexually charged women perceived their work .environments to be, the less job satis- faction they reported. . The case now before the Supreme Court, Mentor Saiings Bank v. Vin- son, may have many repercussions for employers who aren't vigilant about preventing sexual harassment. It in- volves a female employee who sub - mitted to her supervisor's sexual at- tentions under what she says was coercion. It will be a test of the "hos- the environment" thesis because, her attorney argued, the work atmosphere was pervaded by the super-visor's sex- ual aggression, causing Vinson and other female bank employees emo- tional harm. It also will test the issue of liability: Because Vinson did not complain to the bank during the course of the af- fair (she cites threats to her life), the bank's management maintains it couldn't have known and so should not be liable. Many employers fear that if the court rules in Vinson's fa- vor, it will leave them liable for "every office romance that goes sour," in the words of one corporate advocate. Other observers disagree. "The company has put superi•isors in that position because it believes they're ca- pable of supervising responsibly," says Peggy Crull, a research associate with the Working Women's Institute in New York, a research, training and consulting firm that specializes in women's issues. "It's the employer's responsibility to make sure that what's going on there is supervision and not something else." It would seem' that increased em- ployer liability for sexual harassment is almost inevitable. "The trend has been to impose greater liability on companies," says Shelley Kostrinsky, a New York -based labor attorney. "Only 10 years ago sexual harassment wasn't even interpreted as sex discrimination under Title VII. Now we're seeing awards of $20,000 to $30,000 that only three or four years ago would have been $1,000." That, and the fact that sexual ha- rassment hurts everyone involved in- cluding the company, is why you need to be aware .of what it is and how to prevent it. Stopping sexual harass- ment can easily stand as much atten- tion as recognizing it. Perhaps a good .place to begin is with this simple rule of thumb: "If in doubt, don't do it," says Gutek. "Sex at work, in general, tends to have negative effects on women." (For a copy of the EEOC guidelines on sexual harassment, write Publica- tions Unit, Equal Employment Op- portunity Commission, 2401 "E" St., Washington, DC 20507.) Ralph Pribble is a Alin neapolis- based free -lance uniter, Write No. a on Roador Inquiry Card 102 May 1986 - / J _ , TJ I ■ Imprinted . Super Rigid Vinyl ■ BINDERS at =1.89' ■ i _ ■ ■ i ■ +► Pnce etch for 1.000 pc quanbh One coia custom impr mi ■ reduded Qwntn es from 100 paves and up are avariabk ■ Customcraft offers 30 years of experience , in manufacturing binders with hi -tech facilities and competitive pricing. ■ Our expertly trained staff will help tailor ■ your binder needs to your training pro- grams. Deliveries can be coordinated ■�, with your specific seminars. ■ CUSTOMME binders with clear overlay t pockets for insertable sheets are another Customcraft specialty. ■ ■ Ca for complete inf rmation and catalog. ■ C%i S.to m to t � ■ BINDER CORP. ■ P.O. Box 284-TR. 21 Addison La, Greenvale. NY 11548 , t (800) 428 -0934 ■ In N.Y. call 516- 484 -4020. &MOM■Eo■I■■� ■■Ei Write No. ZZ on Reader Inquiry Card Customized, Cost - Effective Training /Development Video Modules • Sales Training • Behavior Modeling • Management Training • Role Play Vignettes • Technical Skills • Skill Modules Exciting Computer Animation/Video Graphics Call 1. 800 - 524 -2619 ARKAY VIDEO PRODUCTIONS, INC. 25 Van Zant, E. Norwalk, CT 06855 (203) 8663352 25 So. Main St., Manville, NJ 08835 (201) 5608373 tion to remedy the situation. The extent to which people see their own behavior as harassment varies all over the map, depending on the individual. Sexuality is, of course, present to some degree in virtually every setting where human beings of either (or any) stripe mingle. Depend- ing on the amalgam of individual at- titudes in the workplace, some work- ers may feel that sexually- oriented interchanges are natural or even ex- pected. How many victims of sexual harassment have heard, "What's the matter, can't you take a joke?'.' But the law is not so relaxed about the context in which sexual harass- ment occurs. Often, people named in a complaint are shocked that anyone would consider them sexual ha- rassers. Susan Webb, president of the Seattle -based Pacific Resource De- velopment Group, which helps orga- nizations learn how to prevent sexual harassment, presents the EEOC guide- lines and then adds her own def- inition. "There's a lot of behaN for between what "s inappropriate and what's ille- gal," Webb says. "For instance, there's a lot of `Hi Honey, Hi Toots, Hi Sugar Puss' that drives people nuts." She tells her clients that. sexual harass- ment is also "deliberate and /or re- peated sexual behavior that's not asked for, not welcome and not re- turned. When I say that, eyes open and heads start nodding." Barbara Gutek, author of the re- cently published Se_x and the K brk- place (Jossey -Bass, 1985) confirms that, not surprisingly, men's and women's views on what constitutes sexual harassment are generally quite different. According to her research findings, men tend to see a sexually - oriented remark directed at them as flattering; the majority of women, while believing other women would find it flattering, are insulted. She also found that the more sexually charged women perceived their work .environments to be, the less job satis- faction they reported. . The case now before the Supreme Court, Mentor Saiings Bank v. Vin- son, may have many repercussions for employers who aren't vigilant about preventing sexual harassment. It in- volves a female employee who sub - mitted to her supervisor's sexual at- tentions under what she says was coercion. It will be a test of the "hos- the environment" thesis because, her attorney argued, the work atmosphere was pervaded by the super-visor's sex- ual aggression, causing Vinson and other female bank employees emo- tional harm. It also will test the issue of liability: Because Vinson did not complain to the bank during the course of the af- fair (she cites threats to her life), the bank's management maintains it couldn't have known and so should not be liable. Many employers fear that if the court rules in Vinson's fa- vor, it will leave them liable for "every office romance that goes sour," in the words of one corporate advocate. Other observers disagree. "The company has put superi•isors in that position because it believes they're ca- pable of supervising responsibly," says Peggy Crull, a research associate with the Working Women's Institute in New York, a research, training and consulting firm that specializes in women's issues. "It's the employer's responsibility to make sure that what's going on there is supervision and not something else." It would seem' that increased em- ployer liability for sexual harassment is almost inevitable. "The trend has been to impose greater liability on companies," says Shelley Kostrinsky, a New York -based labor attorney. "Only 10 years ago sexual harassment wasn't even interpreted as sex discrimination under Title VII. Now we're seeing awards of $20,000 to $30,000 that only three or four years ago would have been $1,000." That, and the fact that sexual ha- rassment hurts everyone involved in- cluding the company, is why you need to be aware .of what it is and how to prevent it. Stopping sexual harass- ment can easily stand as much atten- tion as recognizing it. Perhaps a good .place to begin is with this simple rule of thumb: "If in doubt, don't do it," says Gutek. "Sex at work, in general, tends to have negative effects on women." (For a copy of the EEOC guidelines on sexual harassment, write Publica- tions Unit, Equal Employment Op- portunity Commission, 2401 "E" St., Washington, DC 20507.) Ralph Pribble is a Alin neapolis- based free -lance uniter, Write No. a on Roador Inquiry Card 102 May 1986 - Sexual Harassment in the. Workplace by Jonathan J. Downes Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik &Webster ITLE VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act forbids discrimination in the workplace based on sex. Although Title VII does not specifically refer to sexual harassment, in November, 1980, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued permanent guidelines which con- firm that sexual harassment constitutes unlawful sex discrimination. The EEOC guidelines identify three situations in which "unwelcome sexual advances, re- quests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature" would constitute unlawful.sexual harass- ment: 1. When an employee must submit to such conduct as a condition of em- ployment; 2. When decisions about an employee's job such as promotion, demotion, benefits and wages are based on his or her submission to or rejection of such conduct; and 3. When such conduct "unreasonably interferes" with his or her job per - formance and creates an "intimidat- ing, hostile or offensive" working en- vironment. The first two categories are commonly referred to as "quid pro quo" sexual harassment in which acquiescence to sexual advances or some type of sexual consideration is required in exchange for a tangible job benefit. The third category prohibits sexual harassment based on a "hostile or offensive" work environment, even where there has been no conditioning of employment benefits for sexual favors. Such harassment typically involves work- place conduct such as lewd or explicit sexual remarks, innuendos, jokes, ges- tures, touching, discussions of sexual activity, and display of obscene or sug- gestive pictures or cartoons. It is these "hostile environment" cases which ac- count for a significant expansion of potential employer liability and of which employers must be especially cognizant. S. Ct. 2399 (1986). In Vinson, the Court held that sexual harassment in the form -of a hostile work environment was action- able under Title VII even where the claim did not involve an economic or tangible effect (other than an unsavory working environment itself) on employment. This holding was not especially surprising in light of the fact that the EEOC had by regulation recognized such claims under Title VII and the courts of appeals had uniformly held that a hostile work en- vironment even in the absence of eco- nomic consequences was actionable. The Vinson case involved the claims of a female employee who alleged that her supervisor, the manager of one of the bank's branch offices, had .made repeated sexual advances towards her, fondled her in front of employees, exposed himself to her, followed her into the women's rest- room, made lewd remarks, and forcibly raped her on several occasions. . Vinson: The Key Holdings First, the Court stressed that for sexual harassment to be actionable, it must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive work environment. The Court cited with approval earlier decisions of courts of appeal which indicate that "mere utterance of an ethnic or racial epithet which engenders offensive feelings in an employee" would not be sufficient -- to affect the conditions of employment to such a degree as to violate Title VII. Second, the Court addressed the issue of whether a defense in such an action can be based on claims that the plaintiff's participation in sex - related conduct was "voluntary" in the sense that the plaintiff Sexual Harassment: The Supreme Court Decides The United States Supreme Court in a recent decision resolved many of the ques- tions which have surrounded the increas- ing number of actions being filed under Title VII involving allegations of sexual harassment in the workplace. The case was Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 146 JUNE, 1987 __ ......... .- , HU was not forced to participate .against her will. The Court held that it was not a de- fense. Instead, the Court said the focus was on whether the alleged sexual ad- vances which were the basis of the harass- ment were "unwelcome." Thus, , a victim of sexual harassment may "go along" with a supervisor for fear of job security or as a condition of obtaining equal em- ployment opportunities and still prevail on a sexual harassment claim. However, the Court noted that, in determining the issue of whether alleged sexual advances were "unwelcome" the defendant may intro- duce evidence of a complainant's sexually provocative speech or dress. Third, the Court declined to specifically define the appropriate standard for em- ployer liability for the acts - of sexual harassment of supervisors or other em- ployees due to the lack of a developed record in the case. The Court suggested that in subsequent cases employers and employees should look to common law principles of agency to the extent they were consistent with the purposes of Title VII. The Court rejected the view of those courts which had held that employers are always automatically liable for sexual harassment by their supervisors while carefully noting that the absence of knowledge or notice on the part of the employer concerning the occurrence of the harassment does not necessarily insulate the employer from liability. Finally, the Court's opinion rejected the view that the mere existence of a grievance procedure or a policy on the part of the employer prohibiting discrimination would defeat the sexual harassment claim, even when the complainant failed to utilize the grievance procedure. Such facts would be relevant but not dispositive ac- cording to the Court. The Court made special note of the fact that in the griev- ance procedure involved in the case, the first step was to the supervisor, who, in the Vinson case, was the perpetrator of the sexual harassment. Justice Brennon wrote a concurring opinion in Vinson. The language of the concurrence makes it clear that it will like - ly be a rare case when an employer will not be held liable for the acts of the super- visor whether the sexual harassment has tangible economic effects or not. As the concurring opinion notes, "in both cases it is the authority vested in the supervisor by the employer that enables him to com- mit the wrong: it is precisely because the supervisor is understood to be clothed «lith . the employer's authority that he is able to impose unwelcome sexual conduct on subordinates." Aleritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, supra, is a private sector case but contains con- cepts equally applicable to the public sector. The action was brought under Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000 et seg which is applicable to public sector employers. An employee can state a cause of action under Title V11 for sexual harassment which creates a "hostile environment." Actual economic impact is not a requirement. For sexual harassment to be actionable, it must. be sufficiently severe or pervasive "to alter the conditions of the victim's employment and create an abusive working environment." The fact that sex - related conduct is "voluntary" in the sense that the plaintiff was not forced to participate against his/ her will is not a defense to a Title VII sex harassment suit. The correct inquiry is whether plaintiff, by his /her conduct, in- dicated that the sexual advances were un welcome. The Eleventh Circuit stated in Henson v. City of Dundee, 682 F2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982), that sexual advances are unwelcome "in the sense that the employee did not solicit or incite it, and in the sense that the employee .regarded the conduct as undesirable or offensive." Elements of proof necessary to show hostile work environment in post- Vinson cases include: 1: Repeated comments or conduct of an abusive nature. 2. The working conditions created must have interfered with job performance. 3. The working conditions created would seriously affect the "psychological well being" of a reasonable person sub- jected to similar conditions. 4. Plaintiff was actually offended and in- jured by the environment. In determining whether working condi- tions give rise to a sexual harassment claim, a court will consider subjective and objective factors such as nature of con- duct, background, and experience of plaintiff, his /her co- workers and super- visors, the physical environment, existence of obscene language, etc. prior to plain- tiff's employment and the reasonable ex- pectation of the employee upon volun- tarily entering the environment. Rabidue v Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir. 1986). The decision of Bohen v City of East Chicago, 41 FEP 1108 (7th Cir. 1986) held that nominal damages are not available under Title VII. This is the prevailing view, but there are exceptions. For ex- ample, Henson v City of Dundee, 682 F2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982), held plaintiff can recover nominal damages and thereby be- come eligible for award of attorney fees. Actual damages, nominal damages to sup- port attorney fee awards, and punitive damages are available under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Damages for mental suffering or emotional distress are not available under CONTINUED /PAGE 15 MODEL VILLAGE TRAFFIC AND .GENERAL OFFENSES CODES • Patterned After Current State law • Model Ordinances Included • logical Arrangement of Material • Ohio Revised Code Sectional Histories • Chapter and Code Analyses • Cross References • Comprehensive Index • Graphic, Clear Printing • Practical, Transparent Covers • Reasonably Priced • Assistance In Adopting Codes The Wafter H. Drone Co. Tower East — Suite 180 20600 Chagrin Blvd. Cleveland, Ohio 44122 Telephone (216) 752 -1022 CODIFICATION BY jUSTINIAN Serving 180 Ohio municipalities with new Codes, Replacement Pages (Supplements), Model Ohio Municipal Codes, utilizing the latest in Computer Technology. THE )USTINIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY 2940 Noble Rd. Cleveland, Ohio 44121 Ph. (216) 381 -6400 12 Ohio Cities and Villages } MINOR M� M 3�1 11ARAtititilEAT IRO M PAC"NE0 12 Title VI1; however, it might be actionable under state clainls. In Bohen, the Court held that sexual harassment of fcmalc but not of male employees constitutes sex discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the X IV Amendment, which is actionable under 2 U.S.C. §1983. The Court held that the employee must show intentional sex discrimination or con- scious failure of the employer to protect harassed employees. "Quid pro quo" discrimination, as stated earlier, has been defined as condi- tioning direct economic benefit to the giv- ing or withholding of sexual favors. It is not clear whether an employer is liable per se following the Supreme Court decision in Vinson. Vinson was a "hostile environ- ment" case, not a "quid pro quo" case. A district court in Kansas, in a post Vin- son case, has held that in a "quid pro quo" case, the employer may be held strictly liable for sexual harassment by a supervisor even if the employer had no knowledge of the supervisor's conduct. (Schroeder v. Schock, ?? FEP ? ?, Daily Labor Report 1/21/87 at A -2 (D.C. Kansas 1986) ). Employers must realize that the liability for sexual harassment will in most in- stances rest with the employer. Employers must also realize that employees who sex- ually harass other employees, either by creating a hostile environment or by de- manding sexual favors for favorable job considerations, may be disciplined. Numerous instances of discipline for sex- ual harassment have held that sexual harassment constitutes failure of good behavior. Under the Ohio civil service scheme several decisions of Ohio Courts of Appeals have upheld removals of em- ployees for sexual harassment failure of good behavior. The decisions address several factually different scenarios. These fact patterns in- clude direct and indirect comments, touching, lewd stories and comments, and hostile environments. It is not necessary that the harassing employee work in the same area or be a superior to another employee to create a hostile environment. Also, an employer should be cognizant that some employees may use allegations of sexual harassment to avoid or to re- spond to disciplinary action. That is, an employee may allege he /she was subject to sexual harassment and that disciplinary action against them is in retaliation for fil- ing a claim of harassment. Likewise, an employee may claim that he /she was con- structively discharged due to the sexually harassing work environment. Such a claim was made in the Rabidue case. The Court in Rabidue dismissed the employee's claim of constructive discharge after the em- ployer established that the employee had been discharged for cause. JUNE, 1987 Thcrcfore, although all claims of sexual harassment must be investigated, it is equally important that the totality of the situation be reviewed in an investigation. Development of Internal Policies Steps which a jurisdiction /employer should take to avoid claims and /or liabil- ity for sexual harassment include: 1. Development of a clear policy state- ment on sexual harassment; 2. Establish or expand an existing griev- ance procedure specifically for sexual harassment and perhaps other forms of discrimination which procedure does not start with the immediate supervisor; 3. Train supervisors and management personnel; 4. Immediately investigate sexual harass- ment claims and, when necessary, take appropriate disciplinary action; and /or 5. Help complainants to respond them- selves to situations of sexual harass-. ment. Conclusion Sexual harassment cases will continue to be filed. The obligation of employers is to assure a good working environment. Employers should not posture for the de- fense; rather, employers should attempt to address the problems. before complaints are filed. Counsel the employee who is harassing other employees and do not be afraid to discipline that person. Remem- ber, the ultimate liability will in most in- stances rest with the employer. The Governmental Systems Pledge I pledge that our Computer Systems will provide the same level of training and support for Governmental Agencies as is now being accomplished in more than 60 state - approved installations. Your Agency, too, can benefit from our computerized systems for... • Budgetary Accounting • Fire • Payroll • Utility Billing • Police • Cemetery Records Governmental Systems has applied 12 years of experience in meeting the needs of governmental agencies. We have been developing practical, reliable. systems with all the features necessary to meet State Auditor requirements. For Further Information Call: Gregg Stark Alan Harding Columbus Columbus 614 - 8917325 (home) 614 7 885 -6502 (home) Governmental Systems 691 E. Dublin Granville Road Columbus, Ohio 43229 614 -436 -8080 Looking Forward to Meeting You at THE 36TH ANNUAL OHIO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE CONFERENCE 15 Gregg Stark, owner of Governmental Systems At B o SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY I. Purpose A. The purpose of this directive is: 1. To establish department policy concerning allegations of sexual harassment. 2. To establish proper reporting procedures for reporting instances of sexual.harassment. 3. Define instances, happenings and occurrences of sexual harassment. II. P o l i c y It the policy of this department to provide a businesslike work environment free from all forms of employee discrimination, including incidents of sexual harassment. No employee shall be subjected to unsolicited and unwelcomed sexual overtures or conduct either verbal or'physi.cal. Sexual harassment will be treated as misconduct with appropriate disciplinary sanctions, III. Definitions A. Employee - All department personnel, both.sworn and non — sworn. B. Sexual harassment — The deliberate or repeated behavior of a sexual nature by one employee to another that is unwelcome, unasked for or rebuked by the other employee. The behavior can be verbal, non — verbal or physical..in nature. Examples of sexual harassment could include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. .Sexual comments of a provocative or suggestive nature. 2. Jokes or innuendos intended for and directed to another employee. 3. Suggestive or demeaning looks or leering. 4. Creating an intimidating, hosti l e or offensive working environment. 5. Making acceptance of unwelcome sexual conduct or advances or requests for sexual favors of any nature a condition of employment or continued employment. Iv. Reporting Procedure A. An employee who believes he or she.has been sexually harassed shall.contact either the immediate supervisor or the next highest ranking officer able to handle this complaint A report w i l l be prepared and forwarded to the Chief of Police. B. Al l egati ons ' of unwelcome sexual harassment shall be reported by the employee immediately. C. Until the complaint is found to be valid, the identi— ties of the involved shall be kept confidential. V. Command and Supervisory Personnel A. Command and supervisory personnel shall: 1. Be responsible for reporting instances of sexual harassment in writing to the Chief of Police. 2. Be responsible for initiating immediate disciplinary action if the situation warrants same. 3. Take immediate action to l i m i t the affected employees. from any further work contact. Z' By 1991, there will be 54,000 new cases of AIDS per year in this counby. Savvy employees are dispelling the myths and confronting the fears now, before the problem hits home. AT �IIORK F ighting the Fear By Dale Feuer case of AIDS in the workplace spells big trouble for most em- plo Not because the dread dis- ease will spread to others in the of- fice —it won't, according to all the available evidence —but because it will spark fear and dissension at com- panies where workers are uninformed and managers are unprepared to deal with the situation. New England Telephone & Tele- graph Co. learned the hard way when an employee by the name of Paul Cronan told his supervisor that he had AIDS The supervisor allegedly passed the information along to some of Cronan's coworkers, who com- pounded his misery by leaving him threatening messages, Cronan sued his employer, charging handicap dis- crimination, breach of privacy and other violations of Massachussetts .state law. Although the case was settled out of coui t and Cronan was reinstated, New England Telephone still had done nothing to enlighten its employ- ees. When Cronan returned to his old position, albeit at a new location. all of his coworkers - to - be promptly walked off the job. It wasn't until after the company convened the workers, their families and medical experts from the Boston area for a frank dis- cussion about the disease and how it is transmitted that employees came back to work. In another widely publicized case, Todd Shuttleworth sued his former employer, Broward County, FL, for firing him from his job as a budget analyst four months after he was di- agnosed with AIDS. Shuttleworth is seeking $15 million in damages, charging defamation, among other things. At Bank of America, a manager made a serious, if well - intentioned mistake when she called her employ- ees together in hopes of allaN ing fears about the return of an AIDS- stricken coworker after an extended sick leave. Armed with few facts, the manager created panic rather than instilling calm. The eventual outcome: Two pregnant women who refused to work with - the AIDS v ictim had no choice but to quit their jobs, and Bank of America decided it was time to draft a clear and comprehensive policy on the disease. Even when an employee with AIDS is treated justly and compassionately by management and coworkers, the situation can still evolve into a major workplace disruption. Consider the following excerpt from the February 1987 issue of tlorkino lfbinan, in which the editor -in -chief of an un- identified national magazine tells the story of how her cope editor's struggle with AIDS took a toll on the produc- tivity and morale of the rest of the staff': 'During the spring and summer, Paul spent. mor time in hospitals or at home, less time at Kbrk. His absences had resulted in chaos at the tnagacine, and eler vi-as on edge. The free- lance copj- editors were missing too many errors in manuscripts. and the articles editors were upset about find - ing mistakes still in gallos as well as hai-ing to work oie rtim e to do proof reading theinselies. The art assistant vi-as hai trouble keeping track cif proofs the frt e- lance cops editors hrre TRAI 61 misplacing theme ... It was becoming clear that eivrtlone was at her or his breaking point. Our short tempers weren't due so much to all the extra work; we xyere halving a great deal of trouble dealing x;ith our bottled -up emotions, accepting the fact that our coworker was dying. " Newspapers and business publica- tions are filled with features on AIDS - related strife and tension among em- ployees. A maximum- security prison guard was fired for refusing to do "pat searches" without gloves on inmates known to have AIDS; a telecommuni- cations company suspended an in- staller for six months because he wouldn't put in a phone at the home of an AIDS patient; a hospital in San Francisco transferred two nurses against their will when they insisted on wearing masks and gloves when caring for AIDS patients even though they did not perform invasive proce- dures (i.e., incisions or insertions of medical instruments). Lawsuits filed by AIDS victims abound, and recent court decisions will likely bolster complainants' cases. Furthermore, with the Centers for Disease Control ,(CDC) in Atlanta projecting that the incidence of AIDS will skyrocket from the 34,000 cases counted today to 270,000 cases in just five years, no company should con - sider itself immune from the host of negative repercussions of AIDS in the workplace. Education about the medical, le and ethical ramifications of AIDS ma`. be the only way for organizations to abate the conflicts and legal skin- mishes that arise over the issue. So why have only a tiny fraction of them done anything to edify their em- ployees? A great many employers cling to the illusion that "it uill never happen here," according to experts on AIDS, including Dr. Alan Emery, a clinical psychologist and consultant to the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. "They assume that no people who work for them have AIDS," Emery saes. "They say, `we don't employ those queer people,' or "We don't em- Prevention simply can't happen without educatiom ploy those drug users.'" This kind of denial reflects the common miscon- ception that it is group affiliation, rather than specific behaviors, that puts people at risk for contracting the AIDS virus, he adds. Most companies would rather ' not draw too much attention to the AIDS issue. "Senior -level management is concerned that if they do something, employees will think that someone inn the company has AIDS. And they worry that if they take too public a stance, it will hurt their image in the community,". Emery contends. But as the .AIDS epidemic worsens, so do the workplace traumas and the negative publicity from lawsuits. While the CDC projects that between 20% and 30% of the estimated 1.5 million Americans now infected with the virus will develop the disease within five years, it offers no predic- tions as to hove many of the remain- ing 70% to 80% will get sick after five more years. That's because no one really knows how long the incubation period may be. How'ev'er, the Ameri- can Medical Association states in its ,11onographs on AIDS (April 1987) that "as the epidemic progresses, the du- ration of the incubation period for AIDS will probably increase beyond the already observed six years." With .AIDS researchers apparently years, if not decades, away from a vaccine, not to mention a cure, the fu- ture death count from the lethal dis- ease depends on how well we prevent its spread. And prevention simply can't happen without education. There are those who contend that business is ideally suited to provide that education, and further, that it has a social responsibility to do so. Cait- lin Rvan, a clinical social worker who left the AIDS program at the, Whit- man- Walker Clinic in Washington, DC, to start her own company spe- cializing in AIDS policy and program development, is one of these people. "Corporations have an opportunity to provide a public- health service," she says. " They have the resources, can reach all levels and all classes, and can do it in a way that doesn't impli- cate anyone." Pioneed4 Efforts Given the high incidence of AIDS in the San Francisco Bay area, it's not too surprising that large.comparues in California are leading the way in terms of employer- sponsored AIDS education. While several East Coast companies, including CBS, Citicorp, Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. and The Boston Globe, have made some at- tempts to get basic information to their employees, they typically have attacked the problem on a much smaller scale. With a few notable ex- ceptions, AIDS education in the work- place in the Midwest and the South is nonexistent. A standout in the education arena has been Levi Strauss & Co., which recently donated $ 30,000 to the San Francisco AIDS Foundation for the development of a generic training . package on AIDS in the workplace. In keeping with Levi's long history of community involvement, the San Francisco -based company's CEO. Robert Haas, has rallied area busi- ness leaders around the AIDS educa- tion cause and participated directly in his company's in -house program. When a group of gay Levi's em- ployees embarked on an internal in- formation- dissemination venture, "Bob was down in the lobby handing out pamphlets, attests Roberta Rich - Johnson, a company medical spe6al- ist. That kind of support is critical, she explains, because it provides good visibility for AIDS education and shows that it is not "hidden away in the employee assistance program.'' ,.Back in 1982, Levi began bringing in medical experts on AIDS to speak to employees about the disease and answer quf stions during noontime (Cowinued on tagr b 7) 62 June 1987 w• AIDS. . .(from page 6 2) sessions. The company videotaped some of the sessions and made the tapes available to facilities in other parts of the country. More recently, articles on AIDS prevention, AIDS an- tibody testing and AIDS and children hav started appearing regularly in the company's quarterly health -and- fitness newsletter. What's more, indi- vidual and . group counseling for em- ployees afflicted with AIDS (and their coworkers and families) is offered through the company's employee as- sistance program. Today, the educational program at Levi's company headquarters is far more comprehensive than it used to be. It features the package put to- gether by the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, which consists of a 23- minute video, informational bro- chures for employees, a manager's guide, and a guide for policyrnakers, medical specialists and human re- source professionals. Small ses sions, usually lasting about 90 min- utes, address the company's phi- losophy, health benefits, the disease and its transmission, as well as a medical update and a question -and- answer period. "The [sessions] have been extremely well - received," says Rich- Johnson. "'People are hungry for information. We have full houses." Currently in the process of rolling the program out to the field, the com- pany will have to do some major tweaking of its present program, judg- ing from the early returns. "We showed the video to a group of re- gional personnel managers in Knox - NUe and got a lot of ... ah . 'con - structive feedback,' ' Rich - Johnson chuckles. "The video features inter - views with three white, gay, white -col- lar males. That contributes to the per- ception that AIDS is isolated to San Francisco and to specific groups. We are working on a new video that ad- dresses people with different educa- tional backgrounds and cultural prej- udices. The personnel managers told us they wanted to see more Southern accents, more minorities and more families that had been affected." `People are hungry for the infornzation. We have full houses. "San Francisco is a pretty sophisti- cated place," says Pam Rudd, a psy- chologist involved in Le AIDS ed- ucation and support programs. "The population here is more open and ac- cepting than most. The real challenge will be getting people in places like Tennessee, Arkansas and rural Texas to understand that AIDS is not a gay disease." overcoming Resistance Getting through to people requires that they listen to what you're saying. If Frank Marmo's experience in edu- cating 8,000 employees of the city of Atlanta about AIDS is any indication, achieving this first step can be a ma- jor feat. "When you start talking about sex, homosexuality and AIDS, you encounter a great deal of resist- ance, especially in the Bible belt here," says Marmo, manager of the city's employee development and braining division. "It's been an Inter- esting study in developing and imple- menting a training program that no- body %% ants." Atlanta's pioneering effort at AIDS education for its employees dates back to December 1985, when Mayor Andrew Young approved an ordi- nance proposed by the city council to fund an AIDS education project origi- nally intended for employees of the city's public safety department (po- lice, fire, correction and emergency personnel), about 1,000- people in all. The target audience eventually ex- panded to include all city employees, and the initial funding of $10,000 out of the city budget gre%% accordingly. "A.ndN saw a need and went after it.," Marmo recalls. "It was a very bold step on his part. He has been very strong, very forceful and very sup portive of the project from the start." Marmo and his colleagues tried t use a variety of different media and methods to get the information out. With the help of AID Atlanta, a non- profit organization that offers coun- seling and other services to AIDS vic- tims, the project team produced a 35- minute videotape and brochures ad- dressing sexually transmitted dis- eases in general, AIDS in particular, and antibody testing. But the major thrust, Marmo says, was "direct, hands -on training. And that was the monster." The plan called for one massive train - the - trainer session and two ca- ble TV broadcasts of a live presenta- tion titled "AIDS 101, Information for City Employees." To accomplish the first goal, Marmo assembled a "re- source team" made up of 48 training and safety coordinators, several from each of the city's 10 operating depart- ments. After the training, these peo- ple were supposed to go back to their departments and show the videotape, answer basic questions, provide refer- rals upon request and pass out the printed materials. Everybody on the resource team at- tended what Marmo refers to as a "one day, full-blown, heavy -duty, train- the - trainer session," an undeni- ably intense experience for all. "You've never seen so much exagger- ated machismo and rigidity," he ex- claims. `'People who were normally war and friendl and kidding walked in like John Wayne. People were calling me names and telling me y the y had better things to do than lis- ten to this `fag di stuff.' " Thanks to the professionalism of the experts from AID Atlanta who conducted the training* Marmo says, only one person walked out. "They made it clear that they weren't going to put up with people's inhibitions. They could have come in waging gay liberation flags, and it could have got- ten into a screaming match between the fundamentalists and the gays. But they were there to do the training." Apparently, the trainees eventually settled do«�n and listened to %vhat the experts had to say; while nobody o touched the three gross of condoms TRAINING 67 and safe -sex kits left on a table at first, the goods had disappeared by mid- morning. The live broadcasts turned out to be equally fraught with turmoil. "Just plain homophobia was our biggest problem," Marmo says. "Instead of worrying about who they had been sleeping with or who their spouses had been with in the last eight years, people focused their anxieties on fear and hatred of gays. They did a lot of transference. They wanted to hear a condemnation of homosexuality or at least of free sex, but that isn't what AID Atlanta was gonna give them. . "I emceed the live sessions and in- troduced the AIDS patient. When people I knew saw me shake his hand, they were visibly shaken: They came up at break and told me they wanted to go out and get me a washcloth to clean my hand. But they admitted they now understood this wasn't nec- essary and a few even gave fh;, patient a hug afteer it •ice over." All in all, does Marmo consider the AIDS education project a success? Judging from the results of a true/ false AIDS quiz he administered be- fore and after both the train -the- trainer and the live program, he has little doubt that employees who at- tended the sessions learned a lot. As for sienificant changes in atti- tude, Marmo says, that's harder to claim. But when it does occur, women tend to be more open about it, while men, "especially in this part of the country," are more likely to hide their real feelings. "They feel that they can't appear to be too sympa- thetic because by association they'll be implicated. Men seem to be more at peace just having the knowledge." The Medium Levi Strauss, the city of Atlanta and a handful of other U.S. organizations are leaders in the AIDS education cru- sade because of the strong, public stance taken by their top officers and the amount of resources they have thrown at the problem. By contrast, most American businesses have, as yet, turned a deaf ear. Striking the Stand-up training is the best way to approach AIDS educatiom balance is the small but growing con- tingent of companies that have re- cently launched limited, often single - pronged campaigns. With little in the way of budgets and staff, these em- ployers have managed to develop rea- sonably effective information and support programs. Last winter, for instance, Dayton - Hudson Corp. of Minneapolis video- taped a question- and - answer session hosted by a renowned medical expert on AIDS from the University of Min- nesota Hospitals. The panel of ques- tioners consisted of five employees, one from each of Dayton's compa- nies. "We had a cross- section of folk -s, including a floor supervisor, a food - service worker and a personnel man- ager— people right out there on the front line who would be likely to run into a situation," explains Gladys Westberg, Dayton's health resources manager. "Initially we used the tape to train management and personnel people, because the need to be comfortable with the subject," she elaborates. "Then we left it up to the individual companies as to how far they wanted to go with it. We recommended that they use it if they had an incident [of an-employee being diagnosed with AIDS]. Whenever we did show the video, we had someone with a medi- cal background on hand, a person who knows what's going on, not a per- . sonnel person, for a five exchange." When possible, it helps to have a credible authority present at the showing of a film or when booklets are distributed. "Nothing replaces a stand -up trainer who can answer questions'on the spot," consultant Ryan asserts. "If someone's wonder- ing about a Coke can and [the video saes] you can't catch AIDS from a cof- fee cup, then we haven't answered their question. That person is going to continue carrying that question around. You've got to keep in mind that people have been saving up those fears and concerns for six years." The consensus among consultants and in -house practitioners alike is that stand -up training is the best way to approach AIDS education. "You can't ask a question of a mailing or a video, though they are wonderful as supplementary materials," says Ryan. Levi's Rich- Johnson concurs: "In our experience, direct training is essential because people have questions that require immediate answers. Audiovi- sual materials are better than printed materials, though. The problem with printed materials is that people don't read them if they don't perceive the information as pertaining to them. And that's one of the big prob- lems— people thinking they don't have to be concerned unless a co- worker has AIDS." NNIen workers are wer lied about catching AIDS on the job, they'll prob- ably pay attention to any official com- munication on the subject, written or otherwise. This was the case at CBS Corp. when news of the AIDS epi- demic stirred panic on Hollywood sets over kissing among actors. San- dra Spangenberg, director of health services at CBS, explains the compa- ny's response to the crisis: "Since we're a large, nationwide company, having seminars would have been im- possible. We didn't have the money or the staff. Besides, we had tried hold- ing seminars on drug abuse and other sensitive topics before, and people didn't come. "What we did was to devote one is- sue of our quarterly newsletter to AIDS. We provided basic facts about the disease and its transmission, and we included the company policy that we do not discriminate in emplov- ment because someone has AIDS. Since it was a popular newsletter that was part of a good wellness program, we figured it would be a good vehicle for getting the information across." Using existing in -house conimuni- 68 Jum 1987 cation vehicles to inform workers about AIDS is a good strategy for a couple of reasons. Not only are peo- ple generally more. comfortable with things that are familiar, but anything out -of- the - ordinary in terms of cor- porate communication is likely to raise suspicions that company em- ployees have been stricken with the disease. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. in New York plans to feature AIDS in its company magazine this September, when it embarks on an ambitious pro- gram to educate its 10,000 employees via "a large number of small discus- sion groups," according to company medical director William Schneider. The company also put up posters from the CDC that Est local resources and confidential numbers to call for more information on AIDS, thereby providing a non- incriminating way for people to get the facts. The M essage Regardless of the medium employ- ers choose to carry information about AIDS, the most important message to convey is that. according to both the U.S. Public Health Service and the CDC, the disease is transmitted only through sexual contact, injection of contaminated blood or blood prod- ucts. or the exchange of bodily fluids between an infected woman and her babe in utero. That means that AIDS is not spread through the air by coughing and sneezing or by sharing a desk. drinking fountain, typewriter or toilet seat with someone who has AIDS. While the AIDS virus has been found in tears, saliva and urine,. there have been no documented cases of transmission `ia this route. Typically, specialists in .AIDS edu- cation say, it takes several go- grounds to drive this point home. Sometimes, it also requires getting pretty techni- cal, sa Levi's Rich - Johnson, who has a background in infectious dis- eases. "I don't like to pander to peo- ple," she informs. "If I say you can't get it from a desk. I like to tell them why you can't. And that gets into how viruses wort: and why this one can't 7fl say you can't get it from a desk, I like to tell t hem why.' live outside a human cell and why cells won't stick to your desk." Ryan stresses the importance of approaching the audience with an "informal, down -to -earth manner," whether you are addressing senior management or members of the cleri- cal staff. "I am really respectful of the basic fear people have. I don't ap- proach it as a know -it -all or an expert, but as an equal," she says. It also helps to know what kind of situation you'll be wall:ing into, Ryan ad ises. Recalling a diverse, bilingual, bicultural group of employees she trained at a maximum- security psy- chiatric hospital, Ryan says, "A pa- tient had already been diagnosed and one employee had been fired and two others had quit. There was a good deal of paranoia among the workers. I spent two weeks in the setting before the training and asked management about how far I could go and what terms I could use. I had to be very careful and direct in what I said. I couldn't afford to. use fancy language." Beyond telling workers about how the disease is and is not transmitted, many programs include information about symptoms, prevention, epide- miology, antibody testing and com- munity resources. Typically, medical information is preceded by a state- ment of the company's policy or phi- losoph } - on AIDS, spelling out doc- trines of fair and accommodating treatment for employee afflicted with .AIDS. No educational program on AIDS is complete, experts say, without a separate curriculum designed for per- sonnel specialists, human resource professionals and anyone *Aith man- agement responsibilities. These are the people who need to know how to treat .the employee who has AIDS fairly and legally in terms of hiring, firing and making reasonable accom- modations. These same people also need information on the rights and concerns of coworkers of AIDS vic- tims. Finally, they require coaching on how, to provide effective support and guidance in the event that a member of the work group is diag- nosed as having AIDS. Fair employment practices. On March 3, 1987, the Supreme Court is sued a decision that is expected to have broad implications for the legal rights of employees with AIDS. In School Board of Nassau County, Flor- ida v. Arline, the high court ruled that a person with tuberculosis, a conta- gious disease, is considered "handi- capped" and therefore protected against discrimination under the fed- eral Rehabilitation Act of 1973. While the Court specifically stated that the ruling says nothing about whether AIDS is covered as a handicap, most legal experts are confident that the de- cision will extend to AIDS victims. Although the Rehabilitation Act prohibits only those emplovees re- ceiving federal funds from discrimi- nating against handicapped individu- als, most states have similar, if not tougher, laws. What al] of this means to the indi� making the person- nel decisions is that it is against the law in most instances to fire or refuse to hire someone because he or she is known or suspected to have AIDS. What's more, employers are obliged to make reasonable accom- modations to employees suffering from AIDS so that they will be able to work as long as possible. However, as explained in the April 1987 issue of The EEO Rei "An employer need not incur more than minimal costs or minimally disruptive measures... . Non- burdensome modifications may include providing more frequent rest breaks, .allowing the employee to work at home, allowing for time off for medical appointments, starting the work day later, gi-v ing sick leaves as necessary for treatment and re- structuring the job." TA Lm.,& 1027 • • •r • i� •.0 ti • 4 0% r • At what Int does "Bank of America recognizes that . i i employees with life -threaten in g self - concern 9' lve nesses including but not limited to I,UQ to em Qt�1 ? p � cancer, heart disease and AIDS may � ' h t c ontinue to engage in as man zs o o gag Y of their normal pursuits as their con- dition allows, including work. As long Covwrkm " rights. People who work as these employees are able to meet with AIDS victims have the right to acceptable performance standards, refuse to work under unsafe or haz- and medical evidence indicates that ardous conditions according to provi- their conditions are not a threat to sions of both the National Labor Re- themselves or others, managers lations Act and the. Occupational should be sensitive to their conditions Safetv and Health Act. However, and ensure that they are treated con- . since working with someone who has sistently with other emplowes." AIDS is not deemed dangerous ac- cording to current medical evidence Does It Work? (except in certain health -care situa- Is it possible to evaluate the efI'ec- tions, where specific precautionary tiveness of an AIDS education pro - measures are recommended), the few gram? If you're strictly interested in lawsuits filed by coworkers have re- information gain, a supple pre. /post - sulted in victon for the employer. test ought to do the tuck_ But if you'd The same logic applies to whether like to show that, through education, employees have a right to know if employees become less fearful and someone they work with has AIDS: more compassionate about coworkers Since casual contact in the workplace who have AIDS, you won't find much is deemed no threat to health or proof in the test scores. safety, there is no justification for dis- Levi Strauss judges the success of closing an indi%v idual "s diagnosis. In its program by the things that hauen't fact, doing so would constitute a come to pass at the company despite breach of the AIDS victim's right to the fact that at least a dozen of its privacv and confidentiality of medi- 1,500 San Francisco employees have ca] information. fallen victim to AIDS: lawsuits, em- Pro1•iding emotional support. Expe- ployees shunning or refusing to work rience has shown that keeping a de- with .AIDS victims, demands for reas- partment or vvo k unit running smoothl\• after members find out that si€n;nents and other disruptions. But \\ hat of compassion? At what one of their ca\t•orkers has .AIDS often point does self - concern give wa to is nearl impossible. Fear and aliena- empathy for coworkers who are vic- tion set in, communication breaks tims of AIDS? down and morale suffers. If people Alan Emery of the San Francisco _ take on extra work to cover for their AIDS Foundation has an answer; sick coworker, stress levels can rise UWhen it stops being something that dramatically. Some companies, like has to be whispered about., and when Levi Strauss, offer special support- people finally understand that it can't g rou p meetings for affected depart- be casually contracted. That's wher ments in an attempt to alleviate the people start realizing that we're talk. problems. Organizations that don't ing about a human life." C have mental - health experts on staff can either bring in specialists or fur - nish referrals upon request. A simple statement of company policy on AIDS like the one below from Bank of America, may help employees for- mulate their personal responses to the ______ � — --- - ---- -- - Dale Feuer is contributing editor c situation: TR41YING. ORDINANCE NO . "NS- AN ORDINANCE TO ADD CHAPTER IV TO DIVISION B13 OF TITLE B OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO AIDS ANTI- DISCRIMINATION Sum r This ordinance prohibits discrimination against persons suffering from AIDS or related medical signs or symptoms in the areas of employment,, real property transactions , and business practices.. This ordinance also prohibits the required testing of persons for AIDS and prohibits discrimination in the use -of County facilities. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, do ordain as follows: SECTION 1 . Chapter IV (commencing with Section B13 -62) is added to Division B13 of Title B of the Santa Clara County Ordinance Code to read as ..f o l lo`as : . CHAPTER IV, PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCR:IMI- NATION BASED ON AIDS OR ASSOCIATED MEDICAL SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS RELATED THERETO SECTION 1313 -62 Purpose It is the policy of the County of Santa Clara to eliminate discrimination against persons with AIDS or any medical sign or symptoms related thereto. Towards this end, the County of Santa Clara hereby adopts anti - discriminatory ordinance provisions affecting employment, real property transactions, business establishments., and AIDS testing. SECTION B13 -63 Definitions A. AIDS: The term "AIDS" means Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), AIDS related conditions (ARC), or any other medical condition which a person contracts as a result of having AIDS or ARC. B. Condition Related Thereto This prase P ,spa 11 mean any perception that a person suffering fro . g m the medical . condition i AIDS, any of the conditions described above, or the erce P ption, E E. real or imaginary, that a person is at .risk for any of the conditions described above. C. Business Establishment: stablishment This hrase shall. hall. refer to _ any entity., however or anized which ' g furnishes goods or services to the general public. An otherwise ' lse qualified . establishment which has membership requirements is considered to furnish services to the general ublic if ' P its membership requirements: (a) consist only of payment of fees; o r (b) consist of requirements under which a substantial portion of the residents of this County could qualif ., q Y • D. Employer The term "employer" refers to every P erson, including any public service cor oratio p n and the legal representative of any deceased employer which has any ny natural person in service. E. Real Property Transaction Any transaction affecting real property including, but not limited to, the sale, lease, rental, or financing of real property, F. Person: This term shall mean any natural P erson f irmit corporation, partnership, or other organization, association or group of persons however organized. SECTION B13 Employment - A. Unlawful Fm loyment Practices It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an em to er Y P Y employment agency or labor organization or any agent or employee thereof -2- to do or attempt to do any of the following: 1. Fail or refuse to hire, or to discharge any person; or to discriminate against any person with respect to compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, including promotion, on the basis .(in whole or in part) of the fact that such person has AIDS or any condition related thereto. Z. Limit, segregate, or classify employees or applicants for employment in any manner which would deprive or tend to deprive any person of employment opportunities,. or adversely affect his or her employment status on the basis (in whole or in .part) of the fact that such person has AIDS or any condition related thereto. 30. Fail or refuse to refer for employment any person, or otherwise to discriminate against any person on the basis (in whole or in part) of the fact that such person has AIDS or any condition related thereto. 4. Fail or refuse to include in its membership or to otherwise discriminate against any person; or to limit, segregate or classify its membership; or to classify or fail or refuse to refer for employment any person in any-way which could deprive or tend to deprive such person of employment opportunities, or otherwise adversely affect his or her status as an employee or as.an applicant for employment on the _3_ basis (in whole or is part) of the fact that such person has AIDS or any condition related thereto. 5. Discriminate against any person in admission to, E F or employment in, an y program established to provide apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including any on- the -job training program on the basis (in whole or in part) of the fact that such person has AIDS or any condition related thereto. b. Print, publish, 'advertise or disseminate in any way, or cause to be printed, published, advertised or ` disseminated in any way, any notice or advertisement with respect to employment, membership in, or any classification or referral for employment or training by any orgaai nation, which indicates an unlawful discriminatory act or preference. B. Bona Fide occupational Qual if ication Nothing contained in this Section shall be deemed to prohibit,, selection, rejection or dismissal based upon a bona fide occupational qualif ication. A . "bona fide occupational qualification" shall include but not be limited to the capacity of a person to perform his or her duties without endangering his or her health or safety, or the hearth or safety of others. 1. Burden of Proof In any action brought under this section, if a party asserts that an otherwise unlawful discriminatory practice is justif ied as a bona fide occupational qualification, that party shall have the burden of proving: (1) that the _4_ discrimination is in fact a necessary result of a bona fide occupational qualification; and (2) that there exists no less discriminatory means of satisfying the occupational qualification. Ce Exceptions 1. It shall not be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to observe the conditions of a bona fide employee benefit system, provided such systems or plans are not a subterfuge to evade the purposes of this Chapter; and provided further that no such system shall provide an excuse for failure to hire any person. 2. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any act specifically authorized by the laws of the State of California or any actions taken by or under the direction of the Health Department . of the County of Santa Clara in order to protect the public health. SECTION B13 -65 Steal Pr02erty Transactions .A, It shall be un- lawful for any person to do any of the following acts as a result of the fact (in whole or in part) , that a person has AIDS or any of the associated conditions covered by this Chapter: 1. To interrupt, terminate, or fail or refuse to initiate or conduct any transaction in real property, including but not limited to the leasing a rental unit; to require different terms for such transaction; or falsely to represent that an interest -5- in real property is not available for transaction; 2. To include in the terms or conditions of a transaction in real property any clause, condition or restriction; 3. To refuse to lend money, guarantee the loan or moaney, accept a deed of trust or mortgage, or otherwise refuse to make available funds for the purchase, acquisition, construction, alteration, rehabilitation, repair or maintenance of real property; or impose different conditions on such financing; or refuse to provide title or other insurance relating to the ownership .or use of any interest in real property; 4, To- refuse or .res -trict facilities, services, repairs or improvements for any tenant or lessee; 5. To make, print, publish, advertise or disseminate in. any way, or cause to be made, printed or, published, advertised or disseminated in any way, any notice, statement or advertisement with respect to a transaction or proposed transaction in real property, or with respect to financing related to any such transaction, which unlawfully indicates preference limitation or discrimination based on AIDS. B. Exceptions 1. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any act specifically authorized by the laws of the State of California or any actions taken by or 1i under the direction of the Health Department of the -6- County of. Santa Clara in order to protect-the public health. SECTION B13 -66 Unlawful Business Practices A. It shall be an unlawful business practice for any person to deny any individual the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services facilities, privileges, advantages and accommodations of any business establishment, including but not limited to, medical, dental, paramedical, banking, financing., health care and convalescent services of any kind whatsoever, on the basis (in whole or in part) of the fact that such person has AIDS or any condition related thereto. B. No person shall make, print, publish, advertise or disseminate in any way any notice, statement or advertisement with respect to -any business establishment or public accommodation which indicates that a person is doing or will do anything this section prohio bits. Exceptions 1. Nothing in this. section shall apply to any blood bank, blood donation facility, sperm bank, sperm donation facility, organ donation facility, surrogate mother or surrogate mother facility, or to any like service facility or establishment engaged in the exchange of products containing elements of blood or sperm. 2 - 0 Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any act specifically authorized by the laws of the State of California or any actions taken by or under the direction of the Health Department of the -7- County of Santa Clara in order to protect the public health. SECTION B1e3 -67. AIDS Testing No person shall require another to take any test or undergo any medical procedure designed to show or help show that a person has or does not have AIDS, the AIDS antibody, or any condition related. thereto. A. This section does not apply to an employer who can show that the absence of AIDS. is a bona fide occupational qualification. B. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any act specifically authorized by the laws of the State of California or any actions taken by or under the direction of the Health Depar-tment of the County of Santa Clara in order to protect the public health. SECTION B13 -68 Counter Facilities A. it shall be an unlawful practice for any person to deny any person the full and equal enjoyment of , or to impose different terms and conditions on the availability of any of the following except as necessitated in County medical .facilities by accepted standards of medical practice: 1. Use of any County facility or County service on the basis (in whole or in part) of the fact. that such person has the medical condition AIDS or any condition related thereto. 2. Any service, program or wholly or partially funded or otherwise supported by the County of Santa Clara, on the basis (in whole or in part) of the fact that such person has the medical condition AIDS or any condition related thereto. This subsection shall not apply to any facility, service or program which does not receive any assistance from the County of Santa Clara which is not provided to the public genera l ly. SECTION B13 -69. Association and Retaliation A. Association It shall be unlawful for any person to do any of the acts described in this Chapter as a result of the fact that a person associates with anyone who has AIDS or any of the associated conditions covered by this Article. E. Retaliation It shall be unlawful for any person to do any of the acts described in this Chapter to retaliate against a person, because a person: 1. has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this Article; 2 has supported this Chapter and its enforcement; 3. has filed a complaint in any court; 4. has testified, assisted or participated in any way in any investigation, proceeding, or litigation under this Chapter. SECTION E13 -70. Liabi.lity Any person who violates any . of the provisions of this chapter or who aids in the violation of any provisions of this • chapter is liable for each and every such offense fo'r the actual damages thereof, in such amount as may be determined by a jury, or a court sitting without a jury, up to a maximum of three times the amount of actual damage but in no case less than one thousand dollars ($1, 000.00) , and such costs and attorney's fees as may be determined by the court. In addition, punitive damages may be awarded in a proper case. SECTION B13-71 Enforcement A. Any aggrieved person may enforce the provisions of this chapter in a civil action° B. Injunction: Any person who commits, or proposes to commit an action in violation of this chapter may be enjoined therefrom by a court of competent jurisdiction. C. Non- Exclusive Remedy: Nothing in this chapter shall .preclude any aggrieved person from seeking any other remedy provided by law. SECTION 813 -72. Limitation on Actions Judicial actions under this Chapter must be filed within two years of the alleged discriminatory act. SECTION B13 -73 Non- WaiverabilitY Any written or oral agreement which purports to waive any provision of this Chapter is against public policy and void. SECTION B13-74. SeverabilitY If any part or provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, including the application of such part or provision to other persons or 0 -10- circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this chapter are severable. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara., State of California on by the following vote :. AYES: Supervisors NOES: Supervisors ABSENT: Supervisors DIANNE McKENNA, Cha i r'person Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Donald M. Rains, Clerk Board of Supervisors APPROVED"AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Robert J. Men'fee Deputy County. Counsel RJM/ nlw 3781q i L1- . .. .��.... . •. .. .�wTR..�.�T Iy.. rX•.y.�Ti+�R.w•A.Y.• . . • .� w .��... • --...r .'�.. .. ., . .. .. � r +w• ^. ♦ r• ... � � � ... i 4 I. a. MEMORANDUM Rm Rejected..� TO: City Manager Date FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: White Bear and 11th Avenues Redevelopment DATE: December 4, 1987 The City Council requested that the realtors trying to redevelop the White Bear and 11th Avenues neighborhood into commercial use be invited to a council meeting to discuss their plans. Tami Skweres and Mike Jansen, from Merrill Lynch Realty will be at the meeting. mb � :�: a." North-Tartan Band Boosters 828 North Greenwav Avenue Oakdale, MN 55119 November 16, J. Mr' John Greavu. Mavor City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 551 9 Dear Mr. Greavu: Re e c te�_______ Dam t e- North St. Paul Round-Up Days, Oakdale Summerfest, Crazy Days, Centennial Ce1ebration, Ice Cream Socials, Christmas celebrations, Veterans Days, football, basketball, hockey, and soccer are all local events that for years and years have been promoted and attended by our local high school bands. Our community identity has also been promoted in countless numbers of other events such as the State Fair, Grand Avenue Days, Kapoosia Days, White Bear Avenue Parade, Pavne-Arcade Days, Rice Street Festival, and many more. Out of state performances have included Washington, D.C., Los Amgeles, Nashville, and Chicago. Now for the first to represent our Colleqe Bowl qame time in our history, community and state i to be held in Tampa, we have been selectec n the Hall of Fame Florida on January 1, 1988. Students from North St. Paul and Tartan High Schools are now getting ready to compete and perform in the half-time show. Expenses for this type of trip are more than what we would normally encounter. For example, we.find ourselves having to rent an indoor marching facility to rehearse. This cost alone will amount to more than $2���. In addition, there are contest fees of $1��A, airfare and lodging expenses of over $5C Each student is paying his or her own way, but they need help to keep the trip affordable. Please help them feel proud of the community they represent. Any contribution that your organization could make would be greatly appreciated. Band Booster Club North and Tartan High Schools For more information, pIease call: Bruce Bodelson, Director, Tartan High School Band, 77�-4647 Terry Grill, Director, North High School Band, 77()-4624 NORTH -TARTAN HIGH SCHOOLS Band Booster. Club 828 Na Greenway Avenue Oakdale ,, MN. .5511 4 � Agenda #� T0: Mayor & City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Council /Staff Workshop DATE: December 3, 1987 Thmnf%n 1PTTf%1.1 so A ct 0 0-n by 4,, 0 ,,,-nc s Endorse eieote D@ ' During the past months there has been discussion about the need to discuss and establish short and long range goals for the City of Maplewood. Due to our busy schedules and . long agendas, we have been unable to sit down for an extended period of time and accomplish this. n T C f%l lee Y I%K1 Private industry and more recently governmental organizations have found an effective way of increasing the effectiveness. of their organizations is through workshop sessions where time is specifically allocated for improving communications and for developing goals. The purpose of the workshop for Maplewood will be: To enhance communication between the policy makers and Professional Staff; To discuss and define the roles of Policy Makers and Professional Staff; To fine tune leadership and management skills; To develop a consensus on major issues facing Maplewood; To draft a 1988 Goals Statement for Maplewood; To discuss a five year goals program for Maplewood. BUDGET IMPACT Money was budgeted for 1988 for this. The cost will be $159.50 per participant which includes the use of the meeting rooms, all meals and overnight accommodations. The cost of the facilitator will be $1400 for the two days. This includes preparatory and follow up as well as the workshop materials. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that January 8 and 9, 1988 at Riverwood Conference Center be established as the date and place - for the 1988 Council /Staff Leadership Workshop.