Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1987 09-14 City Council Packet
SI EN (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 14, 1987 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 87 - 18 (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 87 - 14 (July 13, 1987) (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. Gloster Fence 3. Furniture Bids 4. Time Extension N.E. Metro Alano 5. Tax - Exempt Financing Beaver Creek Apts. (Final Approval) 6. Time Extension Miggler Addition 7. Increase 1988 Ambulance Rates 8. Increase 1988 License /Permit Fees and Service Charges 9. MTC Bus Route Changes 10. Planning Commission Resignation 11. Reschedule October 12 Council Meeting 12. Budget Transfer - Election Supplies 13. Change Order 3 & Final Payment (Crestview Drive - Hudson Pl. Water Main) 14. Change Order .2 - Arkwright Street Imp., City Proj. 86 -12) (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit 2675 Stillwater Road (Ader) 2. 7 :10 P.M., 2650 White Bear Avenue (Former Harmony School Building) a. Plan Amendment - 4 Votes b. Conditional Use Permit 3. 7 :20 P.M., Conditional Use Permit 1560 County Road B (John Glenn Jr. High) 4, 7:30 P.M., Keller Parkway (Kath) a. Flood Insurance Rate Map.Amendment - 4 Votes b. Variance 5. 7:40 P.M,, Brooks Court (Morris) a. Variance b. Lot Division Parkway Terrace (Co. Rd. B and.Stanich Ct.) a. Street and Alley Vacations b. Preliminary Plat (G) AWARD OF BIDS T. LTD Insurance (H) -UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Authorizin Issuance of Citation - 2nd Reading 2, Or Garba Collection 3. Preliminar Plat Maplewood Meadows (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Noise Ordinance - 1st Reading 2. Assessment Ordinance - Ist. Reading 3. Plan Amendment Park Plan - Count Road B 4. Proposed 1988 Bud 5. Expand Feasibilit Report (Markfort Addition) Ed Storm Sewer- Ci y Pro 85-08 6. Order Public Hearin Southlawn Avenue (Beam to Count Road D) Cit Pro 85-17 7. Order Public Hearin - Me Street Watermain (Bush to Minnehaha) Cit Pro 87-13. 8. Street Li Petition 9. Chan Order No. I Beam Avenue Water Main - Cit Pro 84-12. 10. Presentation -.James D. Kerri Proble (JJ VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4, 5. 6, 7, 8, 90 10. 11. 12. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M)- ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 13, 1987 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 87 -14 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:03 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 87 - 11 (May 21, 1987) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 87 -11 (May 21, 1987) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Meeting No. 87 - 12 (June 8, 1987) Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 87 -12 (June 8, 1987) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. July 4th 2. Commissioners' Recognition Dinner 3. Final Plats 4. Council Salaries S. T.H. 120 6. N.E. Suburban Transit 7. Upper Afton Road 8. Open Space 9. Frost and English 10. Traffic Reserves Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 7/13 E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Item E -3 from the Agenda to become Item I -10. Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - n y as suomittea ana recom- 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses check register dated 06 -25 -87 through 07 -02 -87 - $570,213.74 : Part II, Payroll dated June 26, 1987, gross amount $147,421.53) as submitted. 2. Time Extension Approved a time extension for the undeveloped portion of the Sterling Street Addition (Outlots A & B) for one year or until the proposed Cave's Junek Addition preliminary plat is acted on by Council, whichever comes first. 3. Time Extension : Jefferson's Fifth Addition Discussed under I -10. 4. Change Order No. 1 - Arkwright Street Improvements - City Project 86 -12 Resolution No. 87 - 7 - 124 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86 -12, Arkwright Street Improvement and has let a construction contract therefore pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 -12, Change Order One. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Engineer are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order One. 5. Easement Agreement - McKnight Road Reconstruction (Beaver Lake to Lar- penteur) - City Project 81 -20 Resolution No. 87 - 7 - 125 WHEREAS. the Council has ordered made City Project 81 -20, McKnight Road Reconstruction, Phase I (Beaver Lake to Lazpenteur Avenue), and WHEREAS, the Council has levied assessments against benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, easements are required for the project on property owned by Bulk Service Corporation - 2 - 7/13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that payment in the amount of $20,000.00 is hereby approved to Bulk Service Corporation and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an easement agreement for acquisition of said easements. 6. Sale of City Hall Authorized the Manager to enter into a six -month contract with Edina Realty as outlined in their proposal with the following additional con- ditions: 1. Prior to the acceptance of an offer, parking arrangements for Gladstone Fire Station be worked out; 2. The vacant land across from the Old City Hall not be sold individually until the building sells. 7. P.E.R.A. Resolution Resolution No. 87 - 7 - 126 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has hired Paul Gregory Paulos to serve as part -time police officer, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood desires that Paul Gregory Paulos be classified as a basic member of the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that pursuant to M.S.A. Section 356.64 subdivision 4, the part -time police officer position held by Paul "Gregory Paulos is a police officer position. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Safety shall hereby cause employee contributions to be deducted from the salary of Paul Gregory Paulos according to the provisions of M.S.A., Section 353.27, subdivision 4. 8. Budget Transfer - City Manager's Contract Approved a budget transfer of $1200 from the General Fund Contingency Account to finance the Manager's relocation costs. 9. Schedule Public Hearing - HealthEast (Tax Exempt Bonds) Resolution No. 87 - 7 - 12Z WHEREAS, City Staff has received a proposal from HealthEast that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (the "HRA ") issue tax exempt bonds, the proceeds of which would be used (i) to finance the acquisition or construc- tion by it or any affiliate to acquire or construct) health care facilities including improvements to buildings and equipment and - 3 - 7/13 other movable personal property to be acquired by HealthEast or an affiliate and located at, or used in connection with existing faci— lities maintained and operated by HealthEast or an affiliate in the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, or the City of Maplewood, Minnesota; (ii) to refund certain outstanding bonds issued by the HRA, the Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul or the City of Maplewood; and (iii) to fund a reserve and pay certain costs of issuance of the bonds, including the discount; and WHEREAS, in connection with the issuance of the bonds, it is necessary for the City of Maplewood and the BRA to enter into a Consent Agreement, which agreement provides that the HRA will be the issuer of the bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. A public hearing regarding the proposed project shall be held on August 10, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. City Staff is authorized to publish notice of the public hearing in accordance with law. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute a Consent Agreement to be entered into with the HRA in substantially the form submitted to the City Council. E —A. PARK ACQUISITION 1. Purchase of 4.8 acres at Brooks and Barclay for Park Purposes a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved the acquisitio to Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes — all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Beam Avenue Water Main (W of T.H. 61) City Project 84 -12 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the adoption of the proposed assessment roll for the Beam Avenue Water Main Project 84 -12. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. City Attorney Bannigan explained the procedures of the assessment hearing. d. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the assess— ments. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. — 4 — 7/13 f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Art Manke, 1210 Beam Avenue Mr. Pat. Keene, 1190 Beam Avenue g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -128 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objec- tions to the proposed assessment for the construction of Beam Avenue Trunk Water Main (W, of T.H. 61) as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 84 -12, and has amended such proposed assess- ment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA; 1. Such proposed assessment,as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be bene- fited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual install- ments extending over a period of 20 years, the first of the install- ments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1988, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assess- ment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1988. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying addi- tional assessments on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the im- provement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the im- provement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. - 5 - 7/13 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk. Nays - Councilmember Bastian. 2. 7:10 P.M., Preliminary Plat : Cave's Currie Street Addition a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., for preliminary Plat approval to create sixteen single dwelling lots. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Commissioner Dennis Larson presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mr. Sam Cave, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. S. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. i. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Cave's Currie Street preliminary plat_sub_ject to the following conditions, except No. 2- developer does not need to transfer ownership of Outlots A & B to the City but shall provide easements. Motion failed for lack of a second. Councilmember Juker moved approval of Cave's Currie Str4 conditions before final plat approval: 1. City engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. The grading plan shall maximize preserva— tion of the hill and trees on Lot One, Block Two, as much as pos- sible. 2. Submittal of recordable deeds to the City Engineer to transfer title of Outlots A and B to the City of Maplewood or dedicate them to the public on the plat for drainage and utility purposes. 3. Submittal of a 100- foot - diameter easement for the temporary Currie Street right -of -way. - 6 - 7/13 4. Provide a twenty -foot drainage easement over the north twenty feet of Lot One, Block One. 5. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement and required surety for the following items: a. Construction of all required public street ponding and utility improvements. b. Construction of a driveway turn - around for Lot Eight, Block One. c. Construction of a driveway for Lot One, Block One that complies with the requirements of Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. This driveway shall be constructed as far to the east of the property as possible and be aligned to retain as many mature trees as possible. d. Construction of the temporary Currie Street cul -de -sac. 6. Revision of the lots in Block 2 as shown on Page 9 to maxi- mize preservation of the trees and hill on Lot One, Block 2, and provide room for a 100 -foot setback to the future house. 7. Show the existing, small triangular piece of right -of -way ac- quired by the County at the corner of Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Wasiluk Nay - Mayor Greavu. 3. 7:20 P.M., Easement Vacation : Maplewood Mall a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of the developers of the Mainstreet Store at Maplewood Mall to relocate a twenty -foot wide utility easement. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -129 WHEREAS, Suburban Engineering initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following described utility easement: - 7 - 7/13 That part of the dedicated utility easement shown in Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, the center line described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition; thence on an assumed bearing of East, along the south line of said lot, 34.94 feet; thence on a bearing of North, 725.77 feet; thence N 44 degrees, 47 feet, 25 inches W., 79.25 feet; thence on a bearing of North 266.08 feet; thence on a bearing of West, 169.46 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence on a bearing of North 419.75 feet and there terminating. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said utility ease- ment have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 15, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on July 13, 1987, to con- sider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered re- ports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described utility easement, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lot 5, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The portion of this easement to be vacated runs through the building site for the proposed Mainstreet Store addition to Maplewood Mall. 2. Relocation of the easement to the west, as proposed, would have no effect on the provision of utility services to Maple- wood Mall properties. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. 7:30 P.M., Preliminary Plat, Cave's Barclay 2nd.Addition a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., for preliminary plat approval to create fifteen single dwelling lots to be known as Cave's Barclay 2nd Addition. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 8 - 7/13 c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Because of the questions raised regarding the proposed park property, Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item for two weeks. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 5. 7:40 P.M., Maplewood Knoll a. Preliminary Plat b. Rezoning (4 Votes) 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Nue-bel Homes, Inc., for approval of a preliminary plat to create 11 single dwelling lots. Staff is requesting a rezoning from F - Farm to R -1, single dwelling for this property. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner Dennis Larson presented the Planning Commission recom- mendation. 5. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. 6. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. a. North St. Paul approval of the sewer and water service connections within Sterling Street and their approval of the construction plans for the sanitary sewer and water main within the cul -de -sac. b. Revising Lots Seven through Ten, as necessary, to increase the width of Lot Seven to at least 75 feet at the building setback line. Each of the revised lots must comply with all lot dimension requirements. c. The Knoll Circle right -of -way shall be moved south to provide at least 30 feet of setback for the existing dwelling. d. The proposed storm -sewer easements between Lots Five and Six, along the west line of Lot Eight and running east /west across Lots Seven and Eight shall be increased to 15 feet of width. - 9 - 7/13 7. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. e. City Engineer approval of final grading, erosion control, drainage and utility plans. f. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, for all required public improvements. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 9. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -13.0 WHEREAS, Nuebel Homes, Inc., initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence, to R -1, single dwelling, for the following- described property: The South 482 feet of the West 452 feet of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 13, township 29, Range 22. This property is also known as 1810 Sterling Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commis- sion on June 15, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on July 13, 1987, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is ade- quately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and con- veniences of the ocmmunity, where applicable and the public welfare.. - 10 - 7/13 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 5. Rezoning would eliminate the potential of nuisance probelms associated with farm - related uses, such as the raising of livestock, in a single- dwelling neighborhood. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Painting Cope Avenue Water Tower a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve a budget transfer of $8,04 from the Water Availability Fund to the Water Maintenance Fund for the amount over budget to paint the Cone Avenue Water Tower. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -131 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Rainbow,Inc., in the amount of $59,189.00 is the lowest responsible bid for painting the Cope Avenue water tank and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 2. Tractor /Loader a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -132 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Carlson Tractor and Equipment Co., Inc., in the amount of $20,291.00 is the lowest responsible bid for furnishing one and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Tractor /Mower a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. - 11 - 7/13 b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -133 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Carlson Tractor and Equipment Company, Inc., in the amount of $22,489.00 is the lowest responsible bid for furnishing one tractor/ mower and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City.. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Order Assessment Hearing - Frost Avenue Recon2truction (Adele to Birmingham) City Project 83 -01 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the proposal. The proposed rates are as follows: Curb & Gutter Storm Sewer (RL) (RM and SC) $10.676 per front foot 078 square foot 155 square foot c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -134 WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of Frost Avenue Improvements between Adele Street and Birmingham Street, City Project 83 -01, and the said assessment roll is on file in the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of August, 1987, at the City Hall at 7 :00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with refer- ence to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk, prepayment and interest charges information and that written or oral objections will be considered. - 12 - 7/13 4. Prepayment of each parcel's assessment shall be allowed, without an interest charge, from the date of adoption of said assessment roll to 30 days past the date of adoption. All unpaid assessments shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from the date of adoption of the assessment roll. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Juker. 2. Alternate Tower Site and Linwood Avenue Water Main - Water Service District 8 Improvements - City Project 86 -15 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve Alternate 2: Order Staff to investigate the alternate tower site with a feeder main located on Linwood Avenue from the proposed Sterling Street to the tower site and the completion of the water main on Linwood Avenue from the existing main east of McKnight to Sterling and the proposed tower feeder main to Century Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following rsolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -135 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has previously prepared a report with reference to the improvement of Water Service District 8, Sterling Street and Schaller Drive, City Project 86 -15, by construction of water tower, streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer, and- WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has recommended the relocation of said water tower and additional water main construction along Linwood Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed water tower be relocated to north of Linwood Avenue and that water main be constructed along Linwood Avenue is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,900,000.00. - 13 - 7/13 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 27th day of July, 1987, at 7:20 P.M. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Recreational Vehicles - Ordinance (2nd Reading) a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table second reading of this ordinance until the Meeting of July 27, 1987. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. Councilmember Bastian stated he is meeting at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, July 16, 1987, with motorcycle groups. 4. Primary Elections a. City Attorney Bannigan updated the Council regarding the proposed legisla- tion for primary elections. b. No action taken. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Conditional Use Permit Renewal : Highwood Avenue (Cellular One Tower) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian stem r.Si Lo /u hi gnwooq Avenue for tlye years suol� replacement of two dead evergreen trees. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Code amendment : Building Setback from Pipeline a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff review. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Councilmember Anderson moved to table Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Metropolitan Council Survey a. Councilmember Bastian moved to rank the five most important issues out of the thirteen identified by the Metropolitan Council: 1. Strategic Planning 2. Vitality of the regional economy - 14 - 7/13 3. Fiscal Planning to pay for long term infrastructure before baby boomers reach retirement age. 4. Transportation 5. Water Quality Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Tax - Forfeited land Sale a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 - 7 - 136 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County, by resolution dated April 6, 1987, classified as non - conservation land, certain land lying within the City of Maplewood, and; WHEREAS, the subject lands are described as Lots 3, 4 and 5, Castle Acres (PIN 11- 29- 22 -31- 0015); and WHEREAS, a copy of Ramsey County's April 6, 1987 resolution (No. 87 -181) and the legal description of land therein classified as non - conservation were received by the City of Maplewood on April 10, 1987; and WHEREAS, state law requires the City of Maplewood to: (a) act on the County's classification of this property as non - conservation and (b) find that there is no public use that the property can be put to before Ramsey County can offer this property for public auction; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has no use for this property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the classification of the land described above as non - conservation land and the sale thereof be and hereby is approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution in the Office of the Land Commissioner. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 5. Easement Agreement and Improvement a. Manager McGuire stated a lot split at the Maplewood Mall has allowed the City to acquire a segment of Southlawn Avenue north of Beam Avenue as identified in City Project 85 -17. The right -of -way has been dedicated and the City should consider the purchase of the existing roadway and utilities. - 15 - 7/13 b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7- 13.7 WHEREAS, the Council has ordered made City Project 85 -17, and WHEREAS, said report identified the need to acquire the existing Mall road entrance drive as Southlawn Avenue right -of -way, and WHEREAS, right -of -way has been acquired for the project on property owned by Corporate Property Investors, Inc., and WHEREAS, purchase of the existing roadway and utilities within the right -of -way is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that payment in the amount of $40,000 for the existing utilities and roadway from the Municipal State -Aid Maintenance Ac- count is hereby approved to Corporate Property Investors, Inc., and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an easement agreement for acquisition of said roadway and utilities. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. McLafferty - 1673 Lark Avenue - Flooding Problem a. Mr. McLafferty explained to the Council the flooding problems he is experiencing. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to instruct Staff.to investigate the problems and install an additional "flap gate" if necessary Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 7. Harvester Storm Sewer Request - Feist a. Manager McGuire stated Mr. Feist owns two lots on Sterling and Har- vester. A drainage ditch crosses the property. Only one lot can be used because of the ditch. The requested storm sewer would allow both of Mr. Feist's lots along with others in the vicinity to be developed. b. Mr. Peter C. Feist, 950 Ferndale, spoke on behalf of his proposal. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 87 -7 -138 WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed that the area described as: Surrounding Harvester and Sterling be improved by construction of storm sewer. - 16 - 7/13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engi- neer, who is hereby instructed to report to the Council with all con- venient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 8. Cope Avenue Improvement Petition - Anderson a. Manager McGuire stated within the last year a feasibility study for the petitioned improvements was prepared by the engineering staff. The City Council, however, did not hold a public hearing. It is recommended that a feasibility study be ordered. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the - following resolution and moved its . adoption: 87 -7 -139 WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed that the area described as: Cope Avenue and Castle Avenue be improved by construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street with concrete curb and gutter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the es- timated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 9. Footprint Lake Storm Sewer a. Manager McGuire recommended that Council request Staff prepare a feasibility report for Footprint Lake Storm Sewer proposal. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 -7 -140 WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed that the area described as: Tributary to Footprint Lake be improved by construction of storm sewers. - 17 - 7/13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer, who is hereby instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recom- mended. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 10. Time Extension : Jefferson's Fifth Addition. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Council directed the Staff to notify the property owners affected by the changes in the preliminary plat. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve a one -year time extension to son Fourth Addit 1. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, for all required public improvements. This agreement shall include the construction of temporary cul -de -sacs as required in Condition Three and a ten - foot -wide bituminous trail (eight feet wide, if no fencing) along the southwest line of Outlot B. The ten -foot corridor for the trail shall be designated on the plat as a pedestrian way. If fencing is to be constructed, the type, location and height shall be approved by the Parks Director. 2. Drop reference on the plat to the temporary cul -de -sac on the north end of "Lakewood Court." 3. A quit -claim deed(s) shall be submitted with the developer's agreement to deed 100 - foot - diameter temporary cul -de -sacs to the City for: a. The north end of "Lakewood Court." b. The west end of "Valley View Drive." c. The east end of " Dorland Curve" or the south end of "Lakewood Court." These easements may be located on adjoining property. 4. Change the street names as follows: a. Show "Lakewood Court" south of Dorland Curve. - 18 - 7/13 b. Change "Lakewood Court" north of Dorland Curve and south- west of Lot One, Block Two, to "Lakewood Drive." c. Change "Lakewood Court" between the west line of Lot One, Block Two and the east line of the plat to "Timber Avenue." d. Change " Dorland Curve" to "Schaller Drive." e. Change "Valley View Drive" to Valley View Avenue." 5. Lot One, Block One, shall be increased to at least 100 feet in width at the building setback line and 100 feet in depth. 6. Eliminate reference to the vacated 100 - foot -wide drainage ease- ment that crosses the southerly portion of Blocks Five and Six. The proposed storm sewer easement shown along the north line of Lots Twelve and Fifteen, Block Six, shall be retained. 7. Eliminate the proposed ponding easement on Lot One, Block Four. The grading plan shall be revised to restrict the ponding area to Outlot B. The storm sewer easement shall be retained. 8. A quit -claim deed(s) shall be submitted with the final plat application to: a. Deed Outlot A to the City for park purposes. b. Deed Outlot B to the City for drainage purposes. 9. The east property line of Outlot B shall be moved east to coincide with east boundary of the proposed drainage easement. Reference to the easement shall be eliminated. 10. A storm sewer easement shall be shown on the final plat in the southeast corner of Lot Five, Block Five, for the proposed storm sewer facilities. The location of the easement shall be approved by the City Engineer. 11. Eliminate Outlot C. 12. City Engineer approval of final utility, grading and drainage plans. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Traffic Reserves a. Councilmember Bastian stated he had been asked what duties the Police Reserves perform. - 19 - 7/13 b. Staff responded. Councilmember Juker moved to extend the meeting past the deadline. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. Councilmember Bastian moved to suspend the Rules of Procedure and extend the meeting to finish the Agenda. Seconded by Mayor Greavu Ayes - all. 2. July 4 a. Councilmember Anderson extended a thank you to all the volunteers who worked to make the 4th of July celebration a success. 3. Commissioners' Recognition Dinner a. Councilmember Anderson moved to instruct Staff to investigate costs for providing a recognition dinner for the Citv's Commissions and Board Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all. 4. Final Plats a. Councilmember Anderson feels that developers, when they file for plats, not be allowed to plan for walkouts. b. Staff to investigate. 5. Council Salaries a. Councilmember Anderson moved to instruct the legal department to investigate procedures for increasing Council salaries. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 6. T.H. 120 a. Councilmember Anderson stated he had read an article in the REVIEW about the upgrading of T.H. 120. b. Staff answered Councilmember Anderson's questions and stated a report should be forthcoming by the end of the year. 7. N.E. Suburban Transit a. Councilmember Wasiluk stated the N.E. Suburban Transit Committee between Oakdale, North St. Paul and Maplewood are requesting more money and that money has been set aside by the Chamber of Commerce to promote cities. It is requested this money be expended for the Para Transit. - 20 - 7/13 b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to suspend the Rules of Procedures to make a motion regarding Para Transit. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to authorize the money held by the Chamber of Commerce for p romoting the cities be transferred to the Para Transit Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 8. Upper Afton Road a. Councilmember Wasiluk stated Upper Afton Road had to be improved and requested Staff look into the options available. # Councilmember Juker left the meeting at 11:00 P.M. 9. Open Space a. Councilmember Wasiluk moved that a "Search" committee be established to designate open space areas. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. M. ADJOURNMENT 11:05 P.M. City Clerk - 21 - 7/13 Action by Co=ed.. MANUAL CHECKS-DATED AUGUST 31 19 8 7 � 2 ej g0 ted - ~ • Page: 1 �.: v.., hrv�e'.5 > E^ r. +!- .•x- �rd,i..- k..- .ri,::�.... Date :x.r`a.i r..: _ 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO . __ DATE..____.__... _ AMOUNT _.... ._ - -- ..._ _� - -_ - -_ .__VENDOR .._._.- __.._. __. ------- _- - - - -__ ITEM DESCRIPTION 2.24M69 08/26/87 11 0 000.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 24M69 - - -- 08/26/87 __ _ _ 6-, 096. 00-- _ _ MINN. STATE _TREASURER LICENSE 224M69 08/26/87 424.00 MINN STATE TREASURER _ _ LICENSE 17,520.00 225C40 08/26/87 _ -_ __----- - --- _.120. OQ_ _ - ---_CLERK OF COURT .._. __.___.__ .__.---- .-- - -__ -. CONTRACT PYM 120.00 * y 225M69 0S/26/87 8,167.18 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 2 . 25M69. _ - _...__ 08/26/87_. 412.50. _ - _. _. -__- - MINN STATE... TREASURER-_ _- -_ _. _ LICENSE 8, S79. 68 _ 226422 08/31/87 120.00 BAKER JAMES J PROGRAMS - - .. -- - - -- - - - - - - - - -_ 124'. 0.0_ _ - * ...... - - - - - - -- - - 226423 08/31/87 48.00 CAREER TRACK INC TRAVEL TRAINING 2 26423... _ __._ - .._08/31 /87 .CAREER _ TRACK I.NC TRAVEL__ TRAINING 96.00 226C94 08/26/87 42,150.00 CUSTOM FIRE EQUIP 226M13 ;; 08/26/87 4,278.25 MAPLE -LEAF OFFIC UMPIRES 226M13 08/26/87 24.00 MAPLE -LEAF OFFIC UMPIRES 226M13 - - -- - - - - -- 08/.26/87 . -- _ - - - -._ ._- 485. 00_ - - - -- -._ _ .MAPLE- LEAF.. OFF I C..- UMPIRE$ 226 08/26/87 529.00 MAPLE -LEAF ._- ..-------- - - OFFIC - - -- - - - - -- UMPIRES 6,316.25 - - - - -- - -_ -- -- - -- - - -_- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - -- 226M69 - - -- _____.._ _ 08/27/87 7 -------- _--- - - - - -- _ __.. 5.08 ,_ 69.____ STATE_ TREASURER---- L I CENSE 226M69 08/27/87 591.50 - MINN STATE _.___ TREASURER - -- __ ------------___-- LICENSE 8,100.19 226NSO 08/26/87 - - -- - - -- -- - - -. 9.87.- - N . S . P _ 226NSO 6/87 08 /2,478.78 2 ._ ... - - N.S.p - - -- -- - _ - - - - -- .UTILITIES UTILITIES 226NSO 08/26/87 26.87 N.S.P UTILITIES 226N80___ 08/26./8.7 -- _ __- - - - -- - --- - - -___ . 2 . SQ ---- __-- _ - - - -- - -N.. S_. P 226NSO 08/26/87 103.72 N.S.P UTILITIES 226NSO 08/26/87 105.31 N.S.P UTILITIES 2261180_ 08/26/87. - -. _... _.. 6 :366.73 -- - -- -- -. N.S.P UTILITIES 226NSO 08/26/87 90.95 - -- - - -- N. S. P _._____ . UTILITIES 226NSO 08/26/87 83.01 N.S.P UtILITIE$ Pa 2 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 2.50 CHECK REGISTER CHECK. NO,_ DATE_ AMOUNT.. 229N80- ITEM_ -DESCRIPTION 226NSO 08/26/87 123.22 N.. S. P UTILITIES 226N80 08/26/87. 08127/87 85.03 UTILITIES 226N80 08/26/87 26.27 N.S.P UTILITIES 22080 08/26/87 60.98* N.S,P UTILITIES 226N80, ______ .......08 /26/87__ 229N,80.__ -- ----- - ------ UTILITIES.. 226NS0 08/26/87 52.32 N.S.P UTILITIES 226N80 08/26/87 22.00 N.S.P UTILITIES 226NS0 08/26/87 9.40_ N. S, P - --------- UTILITIES _ - _ _ -- . 226NSO 08/26/87 6.29 N.S.P _ UTILITIES 226N80 08/26/87 82.50 N.S.P UTILITIES 226N80 08/26/87 e10.48 N.S.P UT I L I TI ES 226NSO 08/26/87 220.09 N.S.P UTILITIES 08/26/87 20.16, N.S.P UTILITIES 226N60 e29N80 ------ t-4& 00- 5.45 N.S.P e29N8,0, 10,491.32 2.29N80 229633 08/27187 08/27/87 229M69 08/27/87 .. . ....... GERMAIN DAVID A 7,286.53 MINN ST TREASURER 480.00 MINN ST TREASURER 229N80 08/27/87 2.50 N.S.P 229N80 08/27/87 2.50 N.S.P 229N80- 229N80 08/27/87 2.50 N.S.P 229N80 08127/87 85.03 N.S.P 5.45 - N.. 18, P.__.__,___ 229N80 08/e7/87 141.66 N.S.P ee9N80 08/e7,/87 155.86 N.S.P 229N,80.__ ee9N80 08/27/87 141.87 N.S.P 229N80 08/e7/87 150.32 N.S.P eP.9N80 08/e.7/87 11. 4.54 .. N 8 p ee9N80 08/e7/87 125.45 N.S.P 2e9N80 08/e7/87 156.69 N.S.P 2e9N80..___ ---------- 08/P.7./87._____. P.e9N80 08/e7/87 e10.48 N.S.P ee9N80 08/27/87 48.98 N.S.P ee9N8.0__ ee9N80 08/27/87 19.45 N.S.P e29N80 08/e7/87 5.45 N.S.P e29N8,0, 5-1.. 2.29N80 N.S.P 229N80 08/27/87 115.19 N.S.P 229N80 I... 48/27/87 --- _111.4 �. 42 N.S.P 229N80 08/27/81 87.01 _ - -- - -- N.S.P 229NSO 08/27/87 39.49 N.S.P VAC CHECK L ICENSE L ICENSE UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES -- I L IT XES, UTILITIES UTILITIES .--.U-T I LI-T I ES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES __.._U_T_I,Ll T I ES___ UTILITIES* UTILITIES UT 11, 1 T I UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES - ,.UTILITIES --- , UTILITIES UTILITIES -. . , ... ....._ _ ......... - .... . ':.r a: r..._...,. yu ...W �, ,: a'•�..x�:. ......� , i .,.� .era .. _, ,: ...�.:..i: •. _: .. �- .,. Page: 3 ... .. 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 585.00 CHECK REGISTER LICENSE _ CHECK. NO. DATE __._._ ___.. _ - _ AMOUNT:.._ .__.. _. _ _ _.. __. __. _VENDOR .._.____ .___.. ... .... . _ -_ __..._.... ITEM_ DE.SCR I PT I ON 229N80 08/27/87 303.23 N.S.P UTILITIES 229N80 08/27/8 _ 7.02.. _ __ .. N.S.P_ . __ -- _ -._. _ UTILITIES. 229NSO 08/27/87 215.14 N.S.P UTILITIES 229NSO 08/27/87 11.15 N.S.P UTILITIES 229 N8 0 _ _ _ ...__ _ 08!2.7/87 _ 381 .59 ._ .. N . S . P - -- _ -.- ..___ UTILITIES.... 22.9N80 08/27/87 280.74 N.S.P UTILITIES 229NSO 08/27/87 13.09 N.S.P UTILITIES _ . 22.9 N8 0 233424 08/31/87 38.40 JOHNSON ROBERT A REFUND 5, 043.44 229U75 08/27/87 687.50 UNITED ARTIST PROGRAMS PETTY CASH PARK Ip_':_ 233A22 08/26/87 4.00 ANDERSON CAROLE SUPPLIES 230A85 08/26/87 - - 50.00 AURELIUS LU PICNIC 50.00 _ 230FOS 08126/87 _ _.__.. _._ 100.00 - - -- ._ -_ -- FAUST DAN... 100.00 230M69 08/26/87 8,054.15 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE ___ _23OM69__._ _____ -- - - - -- 08/27/87 - - - - -_ 639.50 MINN- STATE_ TREASURER _. LICENSE 8,693.65 231M69 08/26/87 585.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE ___- - -- - - - - -- -- _ - - ------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- ---------------- - - - - -_ _ ____ -- - - - - -- -- 585. 00 - -'�` ---- - -__ -_ 232C40 08/26/87 106.50 CLERK OF COURT CONTRACT PYM f 106.50 _ 232M69_. 08/27/87.__.- __ _ -- -- _-- __ - -. -._ 9, 806..8.8.-..._- -__ -- �CENSE__------ ._------ 90806.88 - - - - -- 233424 08/31/87 38.40 JOHNSON ROBERT A REFUND 233A22 08/26/87 1229 ANDERSON C AROLS PETTY CASH PARK Ip_':_ 233A22 08/26/87 4.00 ANDERSON CAROLE SUPPLIES Page: 4 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK. NO.. DATE_.. AMOUNT_ . -- __. _ _VENDOR :_LTEM. DESCRIPTION` 233A22 ,� 08/26/87 3.17 ANDERSON CAROLE SUPPLIES 233A22_ _ :08/26/87 ___._ _ __.... _1...49__.... _ANDERSON.` CAROLS -__ ___ _ __.___ __._ MAINT SUPPLIES_ 233A22 08/26/87 1.09 ANDERSON CAROLE TELEPHONE 233A22 08/26/87 4.15 ANDERSON CAROLE TRAVEL TRAINING 233 -A22 _ 08/26/87 _ 8.99 _._ _ _ . ANDERSEN CAR OLSSUPPLIES_.. 35.18 * * * ** 233C22 08/26/87 7.53 COMM OF REVENUE FUEL TAX 23 3.C22 - _ 08126/87 6. 74...____,_, _. ___.. COMM OF REVENUE _ FUEL. TAX. 233022 08/26/87 5.89 .. - _._._ _ COMM OF REVENUE .. FUEL TAX 233022 08/26/87 6.36 COMM OF REVENUE FUEL TAX 233C2.2 08/26/8.7 __ _ _. - .- __--- ..... 1.4. t t-- ._.--- __..._._ - - -' -- _ - COMM._. OF.. REVENUE _.- ._.__.._____.__-- '- __ - -__ FUEL_. TAX- 45.63 233L15 08/26/87 400.00 I.C.M.A TRAVEL TRAINING -------- . 400-. 0 Q _ - — - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- 233L03 08!26/87 526.50 LAW ENFORCEMENT P/R DEDUCT 526.50 ------- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - _ .. _ .. -- - -' - C33M2 - -" - ------- - -- __- 21., 000. 00... METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC PHL 233M20 08/26/87 420.00 - - METRO WASTE CONTROL _ - - - -_.. SAC PSL 20,580.00 .233 M6 9 - 08/27/87 - -- -- - -. 7 , 464 ._76 _ -- - - - -- MINN STATE TREASURER_ 233M69 08/27/87 457.50 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 7+922.26 233N80.1... _..08/25/87 _ - - - _ 3. 67 - - - -- - -_ _ N. S.. P - - -- - - - - -- - - UTILITIES 233NSO 08!26/87 2.50 -- -- - - -- N.S.P - - -_._ UTILITIES 233NSO 08/26/87 2.50 N.S.P UTILITIES 233N8.0 _ _ --- - - -- 233NSO 08/26/87 11.74— N.S.P UTILITIES 233N80 08/26/87 77.96 N.S.P UTILITIES 233N80 494o28 - - - -- -- -- N. S. P - - - - -- - -- - .. - -------- 233NSO 08/26/87 42.95 N.S.P UTILITIES 233N80 08/26/87 11.74 N.S.P UTILITIES 233N80.._ _ 08/26!87.....__._._.._. _ -------- - -__.- .-- ..- - - - - -- 6 . 29 N. S_ P_-__.__-___. ___._________________________ -_ UTILITIES.____._._._ 233NSO 08/26/87 5.45 N.S.P -.._._ UTILITIES 233NSO 08/26/87 494.31 N.S.P UTILITIES Pa 5 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 08/27/87 CHECK REGISTER MAPLEWOOD ST CHECK NO.. DATE AMOUNT-..--...--. ------- - --- - ----------- - DESCRIP710 233P95 08/26/8,T FWT PBL 236MI5 PERA, PBL. 233P95 08/26/87 45.00 P.E.R.A PERA PBL 233P9S 08/26/87 10,298.24 P.E.R.A PERA PBL 233V66 08/26/87 19.50 VORWERK ROBERT E P/R DEDUCT METRO SUPERVISORY UNION DUES 19.50 14.00 236042- PYt .08127/87 311.70 615.29 ASS 311.70 236AOS 08/27/87 429.65 AFSCME UNION DUES 236C35 08/27/87 20,087.50 EMP CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION M087.SO -- ------ ------- ...... 23611S. RETIREMENT_ DEFERRED COMP 236115 08/27/87 1o799.78 ICMA RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP Ss913.80 .................... .. 236M13 . . .... __ 31 023.75 MAPLE—LEAF OFFICIALS PROGRAMS 3, 023.75 236MI5 08/27/87 5o494.64 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL 236M 15 08/27/87 15, 619. MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL 236MI5 08/27/87 287.50 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK SAYINGS BONDS 236Ml5 08/27/87 S#494.64 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL 236MI8 08/27/87 14.00 METRO SUPERVISORY UNION DUES 14.00 ----- -- ---- 236M35 .08127/87 311.70 BENEFIT ASS 311.70 P age: 6 1987 CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0 . -. DATE _ AMOUNT -. _ _. _ _ . VENDQR.. ._...- .---- .._- ._ - - _ - - - -- __...ITEM. DESCRIPTION _ 236M6 1 _ 08/27/87 160. 00. _ . _ . _ - ... - - - -- _ MN- -. ,14UTUAL_. LIFE_ INS _ __ __ ----- - INSURANCE 1 60.00 * 236M65 08/27/87 7 MN ST COMM /REVENUE SWT PBL 236M68 236M68 08!27/87 08 / 27 /87 116.99 MN ST RETIREMENT - -- ___ - -- - DEFERRED COMP 60.01 MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP 0.0... � .__. _. - - - -- -- __---- _- ___--- - - - - -- --- __---------- - - - - -- --------------- - -._._ - 236M69 236M69- 08/31/87 0901/87 9l742.E6 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE ___ .._ -_.. 236M69 _ 08/31/87 _ 51s008.62 548.50 MINN TREASURER.__--- LICENSE__ _ --___- _ 236M69 09/01/87 422.00 MINN STATE TREASURER MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE LICENSE 36W25 08/27/87 175. 00 -, WISC DEPT REVENUE SWT PHL 175.00 237D24 08/31 /87 _ -__ - 08/31/87 -. . _ - - - - -- - ._ ._ T . 00 DEPT_ NATL RESOURSEB. _ -_._. __ -.- . DNR:. LICENSE 237D24 08/31/87 153.00— 153.00 DEPT NATL RESOURSES DEPT NATL RESOURSES DNR LIC DNR LICENSE DEPT.. NATL._ RESOURSES. -_ DNR.._ LIC__ .00 - - -_ -- 237E64 08/27/87 28000.00 EMP BENEFIT CLMS DENTAL CLAIMS 237J32 237J32 - 09/01/87 09101!87 -- -- - - -- - -- - _ - - - -- -- 722.37 - __ -- _ - - . _ - _ . _ _ _ . _ - ------ -- - - - -- _ J L SHIELY . -- - - -- - - _- CONTRACT PYM _ 237J32.- _ _..__ 09/01 /87 __- . -- 9.41" _3, 72 i . 9t__ J L SHIELY L... SHIELY_ DISCOUNT 237J32 09/01/87 48.18— ____.._ J L SHIELY CONTRAC.T_. PYlt- .. - -_ - -. _ -_ CONTRACT PYM 4.386.69 237M69 237M69 08131!87. 08/31/87 - _ -_ - -_ _ 69434.10.. MINN.. STATE_ TREASURER_ -___ - 599.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 7, 033.10 238425-. 08/31_/87___ . _ __- __ .___.._ 335. QQ__._. - __.__PEDERS -ON. BROS_CONTR_..- __ - - - - -- CONTRACT- _PYM._- ._-- .__. - - -. _ _....._.....`-.._.-..__._.........—,......-... ..+-. w.... n.... n..+,«......._........ ...-.. w.. v.. e.. w.. �.. ..... -........ w..-.. .. ua. .....»..+•. w1.+.,' ws....... m... Page : 7 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD wm........... a.. a>.. w. .w.ww..a.wy.u.nwwwe.wwMww...tiaa _ CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE_ _ _ _ _ AMOUNT_ _..VENDOR__ __ _ - - -..__ ___.. _.------ _------ _- - -_... ITEM DESCRIPTION 335.00 238845. _ _ __08/31187 _ _ 19.44 _ _ BOARD OF 19.44 238M69 08/31/87 7,087.75 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 238M69 08/31/87 . .. _- - - _ _.. 503. 00 -.. -_ _ - ...._..._. _ MINN STATE_. TREASURER 7,590.75 239C40 08/31/87. 122.00 CLERK OF COURT DL FILING FEE 12 239M69 08/31/87 308.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 239M69 08/31/87 8,347.85 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 8 240436 09/01/87 9,240.00 VARS DENTON CONTRACT PYM 9,240.00 -- - - __ - - -- - - -- _ ...... _ _.. - -- -- - - - - 240M69 09/01/87 - ._ ._ ._ -_ -._ __._.._- ___..7, 099.2:5 _ --------- _.___._ MINN . STATE TREASURER___._ LICENSE 40M69 09/01/87 681.00 MINN STATE TREASURER _..__ LICENSE 7 # 240N80_ 09/01./87 240N80 09/01/87 3.67 N.S.P UTILITY 240NSO 09/01/87 3.67 N.S.P UTILITY 24 0NS0__._ _. __ 09/01/87 - - 81.14 UTILITIES 240N80 09/01/87 78.83 N.S.P . -- UTILITIES 240NSO 09/01/87 108.31 N.S.P UTILITIES 240NSO - - -- _._. _ 0 9 / 01 /87 _ _ - -- _ _ ._ ._ . - 134. 9 ! _ - - __ -. -- - - - - - -- N ._S .__P _ - -__- _.UTILITIES 413.03 312,483.08 FUND 01 TOTAL. GENERAL 2,875.85 FUND.03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHARGE 4, 386.69 --- - _ ---- _FUND - ! t TOTAL_. - - - -_ PARK DEVELOPMENT 9,240.00 FUND 47 TOTAL 84 -14 WALTER ST 1,790.45 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER F' 20000.00 FUND 94 TOTAL DENTAL SELF- I.NSUl- 17,652.67 FUND 95 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT 54.62 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE 8 EQUIP ACCOUNTS PAYABLE :.: _,. DATED SEPTEMBER : ...... �Y. 14 9 1987 Page: 1 _� _ u... _. 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE - ------ AMOUNT - ----- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 257012 09/02/87 41.49 BRUDZINSKI PAUL CT APPEARANCE PS7042 350.00 257069 09/02/87 -- -. - - - - 75.00 U S WEST PAGER RENTAL 75.00 257074 09/02/87 4.00 BATHKE CO OXIDE CYLINDER coo 257216 09/02/87 7.01 COTTER CHGE CARD SUPPLIES 257216 ;; 09/02/87 5.44 COTTER CHGE CARD SUPPLIES 257216 09/02/87 —_- - COTTER CHGE CARD SUPPLIES 2S7216 09/02/87 !__.- _..5. _._.. _ _ 3. DOTTER CHGE CARD — SUPRL IES -- 21.35 257236 --- -- -- 09/02/87 22.94 O RR JANICE K MILEAGE 22, 9 * __ -- -. - -- 257311 09/02/87 132.50 FEDERAL EXPRESS DELIVERY 132.50 25731 6 d' 09/02/87 80.00 _- �- - - - - -- HILL - MURRAY ----- __�_ - - -- PRO CRAMIS---- _ - -._. ____ 80.00 257329 09/02/87 28.66 SNAP —ON TOOLS SUPP 28.66 257336 09/02/87 10.00 BURLINGTON NORTHERN CONTRACT PYM 257336 09/02/87 10.00 BURLINGTON NORTHER CONTRACT P YM 20'.00 si.kn "' ..r_s. .'tir'i"4 n; ^i.:2 - u._$' ✓.e.. - Page : 2 . _... nr._..- �- .:.. w+ v. o.... a.. sn+ a�. x:..:. usa• wr+... asia... 1987 CITY v... ay. w ..o.wa: <c.w..c.r..rs.+n*=e:.v :..w...w.re....++ymw....e OF MAPLEWOOD . wr.. vwcauum +ww.ea..a-+e.ra�sw'.s'aw wra�sArwt- CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION. r. 257338 09/02/87 16.64 LASSIDAY LIZ MILEAGE 257338 09/02/87 _ _ _ 27.04 CASSIDAY LIZ MILEAGE 79.56 257345 « 09/02/87 122.46 JENSEN PAUL MILEAGE 122.46 257396 09/02/87 -- - - -- - - - - -- - -... 58. 00 FUN . SERVICE RRQ6 SUPPLIES ..._..._ 58.00 257403 09/02/87' 200.00 P.C.SOLUTIONS SUPPLIES 200.00 257426 09/02/87 18.00 BAKER DEBBIE REFUND 18.00 257427 09/02/87 18.00 BAKER LUCILLE REFUND .18.04 257428 09/02/87 99.23 HAYDEN MURPHY SUPPLIES 99.23 . _:._ 257430 09/02/87 13.00 _ - -------- - - - - JOVCNOVICH ROBERT .- _ -_ ..._.__._.--- _.__--- -.- -_ . RE .F.UND . __ -. - j 13.00 257431 0942/87 63.44 MN PLAYCRt�UNI' - - -- T_ - - -- - SUPLIES -- - -- 63.44 257432 09/02/87 515.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS CONTRACT PYM 515.00 257433 09l02�87 - - - -- - --- ' - - - - -- - -- __ - - - - -_ t -- 0.0 - '------ - - -.__ TRtINSEM BARDARA - -___ _ - - - -- --- - - - - -- REFUND - - - - - -_ . - -- 13. 00 . -- ------ 25743409 f02/87 i - -- - -- --"- 5.00 - -_- TSCHIDA_ JAMES ---- ____ -. REFUND - __.._ - - - -- 5. 00 257438 09/02/87 222: 4S____------ - - - - -- TURB'EV'ILLE- 222.45 257A02 09/02/87 5.88 ACRO MINN SUPPLIES _ ____----- - - - - -- 257A42 09/02/87 -- 1.0.3__ . _ - - - - - -- - - -- ACRD MI NN- ___.___------ - - - - -- - - -_ -__ SUP PL IE� 257A02 09/02/87 10.35 ACRO MINN SUPPLIES 91.86 Pa 3 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 26.57 257AI5 09102/87 228.00 AEC ENGINEERS CONTRACT PYM Z5 7AI5 09102/87 3,170.70 AEC ENGINEERS PYM 3o398.70 257A45 09/02/87 35.00 AMER PLANNING ASSN MEMBERSHIP 35.00 * _ 257AS5 09/02/87 179,07 AMERI—DATA SYSTEM CONTRACT PYM 257ASS 09/02/87 599.00 AMERI—DATA SYSTEM CONTRACTI---,P-YM-.. 257AS5 09/02/87 ..- . 87.13 AMERI—DATA SYSTEM _,_,_______ CONTRACT PYM -,---,.-., - 865.20 257A59 09/02/87 86.70 AMERICAN FASTERNER SUPPLIES 86.70 2STA69 09/02/87 200.76 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT 257A69 09/02/87 75.10 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT 278.86 257B4S 09/02/87 57.96 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 257845 09102/87 27.72 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 257B45 09/02/87 �80.32 --- BOARD OF WATER COMIf -- U T I I 257845 09/02/87 12.12 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 257845 00/02/87 25I.32 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 257845 09/02187 12.12 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILITIES 441.56 257C55 09/02/67 60.00 COPY DUPLICATING DUPLICATING COST. 60.00 257C57 09102/87 143.47 COLLINS KENNETH UNIFORMS 257C57 09/02/87 205.67 COLLINS KENNETH TRAVEL TRAINING 257C57 = 09/02/87 2.01— COLLINS KENNETH TRAVEL TRAINING 347.13 257C58 -l---------.--------- 09 /02!8 7 - . - 9 - 1 .86 6 COPY EOUIPMENT 91.86 257E70 09/02/87 19.90 ENRICH FISH MED SUPPLIES asltl 0 0 2 / 272.32 ENRICA FISH MED_'______'__'_SUPPLIES 292.22 257E87 09!02/87 885. 00 ESS BROTHERS 6 SONS 7o885.00 257F26 09/02/87 52.89 FIRE SAFETY SUPPLIES REPAIR MAINT Wig a a 4 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD .......... CHECK REGISTER CHECK - ------- DATE AMOUNT ------ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION' 257C59 09/02/87 --------- I50.0 - , CORPORATE RISK MGM CON'SULTING.— 5O.0 0 257D22 09/02/87 32.50 DAVIES WATER EQUIP SUPPLIES 32.SO 257D30_ 257D301 09/02/87 ULM- 09/02/87 141.12— 8.00— DALCO DALCO SUPPLIES 257D30 09/02/87 "--,--,-DALC-O-*- .... SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 1 66-30 894.00 . ...... ...... - DALEY PAT CONTRACT PYM 894.00 257D43 09/02/ 255. 00- DIAMOND RADIATOR SUPPLIES 255.00 257EO7 EAST HAWKODAK CO-------- Su pp L I ES -- 257E07 09/02/87 3,29, 29.59 EASTMAN KODAK CO SUPPLIES 09/02/87 . .. ......... 65.76 EASTMAN EASTMAN KODAK KODAK CO SUPPLIES 257EO7 257E07 09/02/87 42.74 EASTMAN KODAK CO SUPPLIES 257E07 _____.__._09/02/87 49/0218' 0 9/ 02/87 26.30 98 EASTMAN KODAK CO SUPPLIES 257E07 09/02/87 0 9/02/87 42075, EASTMAN KODAK CO SUPPLIES 257EO7 09/02/87 ' 19.73 19. 73 EASTMAN EASTMAN -- KODAK - KODAK CO SUPPLIES 328.80 * - ES 257E70 09/02/87 19.90 ENRICH FISH MED SUPPLIES asltl 0 0 2 / 272.32 ENRICA FISH MED_'______'__'_SUPPLIES 292.22 257E87 09!02/87 885. 00 ESS BROTHERS 6 SONS 7o885.00 257F26 09/02/87 52.89 FIRE SAFETY SUPPLIES REPAIR MAINT P g e : . 5 _ .r:rravw !w.. font ..ww -�'Tnr .. a l;' fYi t." pllp�lpm.;:'. i• YPYrtwri�Rfe. �a�fae' f�•^ Jlw /!asfw! *1m1�LEa4_:a7ifa^1Maw.YY �. yip WO�Wa'i.Mn.MA 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 52.89 # CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 257F32 09/02/87 72.50 FIRESTONE STORES TIRE REPAIR - 72.50 * _ ..___- - - - - -- ---- -- 257G10 09/02/87 12.60 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257G10 -- 09/02/87 _ _ _._._ - - - -- ..__...__. 12. b0 G S K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257810 0 9/ 02/87 -- .-- -__.__ ' . Q4 __. _ - -- SERVICES __ -.. _--- ___UNI FORM$_.__._ 257G10 09/02/87 40.74 G 8 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 0 9/02/87 47.04 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257G 1 0 09/02/87 47.04 G 6 K -_ -_.- 257G10 09/02/87 40.74 G S K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257G10 09/02/87 12.60 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257410 09/OE�87 12e 6-0 - - -- - -- __ __K SERVICE& -___ __ _ - -__ UNIFORMS___.___.__ -__ 257E10 09/02/87 37.80 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS 2574 10 09/ 02/87 _._..._._ - -__ ._.__ 37.80 G 8 K SERVICES - UNIFORMS 257G 1 0 09/02/87 37.80 _ _- _._ ._ G 6 . K _ SERV ICES - -- UN I FORM S ______ -- __.- . - - - -- __ -- 257G10 09/02/87 37.80 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257410 09/02/87 37.80 G S K SERVICES UNIFORMS 7 G 10 09/02/87 3 7 . 8 4 __._ -___ -_ -_ _ SE RVICES _ -__._ U N I FORMS - - - - - -- 257GIO 09/02/87 37.80 G 8 K SERVICES UNIFORMS _. 2574 10 , 09/02/87 _ __. -_ -._ _ _._._ _.. 37 . 8 4._ G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257G 10 09/02/87 _ .., - . - -..____ 30.56. C & K SERVICES 257G10 09/02/87 30.56 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257G10 .. 09/02/87 30.56 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS 2574 10 09/02/8 7 3 . ._. _____..______ 8 - SE I CES . _._.___ -- - UNI FORMS._. _____ -_ 257G10 09/02/87 30.56 G 6 K SERVICES. UNIFORMS 257G 1 0 - 0 .. 9 / 02/87 9.00 G & K SERV I CES UNI FORMS 257G1 0 09/02/87 9.00__- - _ __...G d_...K SERVICES_ ..------ ._.- ------ - - ---- UN IFORMS ._ - - -- - - - - - -- 257G10 09/02/87 9.00 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS 257G10 09/02/87 9.00 G 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS _ _ _ 257G42 09/02/87 149.50 GENERATOR SPECIALTY REPAIR MAINT - - - - - - - -- - -- - _ - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - 9.5 0 * -- --- -- - -_ - -- -- 257G45 257G45 09/02/87 116.58 GOODYEAR TIRE CO REPAIR MAINT 257G45 0 65.64 GO ODYEA R TIRE C R EPAIR MAINT 334.50 * ..----- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- ..____ 257G57 09/02/87 473.00 GRACE DUANE CONTRACT PYM -- - - _ - -- -_ _ - -- -- _ - -- .. - -- 473.00 ' M. l�? L1': sFNM `•t;e;:K`Y.:i«s�:P'RS'M": df'�iY"- +` \ a[S }Y'Y`- •_ -..a« .. . - ....._ ... .... _ Y. - ..._.....+s +.wti...w «...a... - .xm...::.zv+ct .. _ ..... _. _. .... .. ''- . _ t J .t >o . air y4'h yr ^.� t'': -$ uf: ' ih9.( t. L -:i.41 UfS. ..ti_Ys WI: ♦'n7. Page: 6 . y v. s+ crcrx+,- p ' 1987 CITY 4 +....a-•ewmara.:.,+rii. snRw.- nar. s« .- a-,. rn•... awa, r. wvrnw+ ' OF MAPLEWOOD v.. a. . urm...-.. n .+rwruwMVw.oaocra......VOS+rer WanJlwvrr•f _ o �__ _ _ +r.e .rw.arwavw�.oa CHECK REGISTER E' CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIGN 257G60 09/02/87 14.00 GRUBERS HDW HANK SUPPLIES 257G6 0 09/02/87 19.95 GRUBBERS HDW HANK_ S UPPLIES r 257G60 09/02/87 5.99 GRUBERS HDW HANK SUPPLIES ' 39.94 f • j 257HOS 09/02/87 24.50 H.C.O. FUEL OIL 24.50 4' 257H29 09 / 0 2/87 _.--- -_ -.__ - -- - 118.00 HEALTH RESOURCES TESTS 257H29 09/02/87 , 593.00.___. _ -__ ____.__ HEALTH RESOURCES - -- ___---- - - -_ -- TESTS-- - -_ -__ __- _---------- _..__.. 2S7H29 09/02/87 118.00 HEALTH RESOURCES TESTS _ 1,829.00 1 257H41 09/02/87 - 20.26 -- - - - - -- HI RSHFIELD3 -_— SUPPLIES - - - -- - _ -- 20.26 _ 257J30 db 09/02/87 _._ _ .__ 671.00 J8J TROPHIES SUPPLIES 257J30 0 .__._.52.00_ .. J &J _ SUPPLIES _ i 723.00 257K21 09/02/$7 - -- - -_ 20.00 - -- KANE MICHAEL CONTRACT PYM 20.00 i 257K33 09/02/87 775.00 KENNA JOHN J CONTRACT PYM 775.0 - 257K7 0 - 09/02/87 - - -- 257070 09/02/87 253.60 KREBS'ENTERPRISES SEWER 1,266.79 257L08 . - -- - -- 09/0Ef87. 8 ._ 0 . 0 .- -- _ - -- LARRYS LIVE_BAIT -- ------------- SUPPL -IEg— - - - - - - -- 8.00 257L16 09/02/87 38.16 LINDAHL CABINETS SUPPLIES r - _ .,. , - _,, ,... [ .v..,•'r - .:....- .a._ ;..,,.. - .c...:cn- :i?_^•r ,+n...,r_t pv�,�.�o - Hu..no.... «.z�wA.:vi��._v;_. 4�es.' sA� `es<bC•f04Y�'iP: ^vµ�`aM*2'IYf. m^ �w. gaMw. e.. tvwsrnR.' ee�fM. 3: n' M�:: �. ��baM1''_! �MMe�. M�l 1l I.► sY'^. M. �: �Yf4ar�N 1M. E lmY�.Kalmsryy9sL'TtY'wlb`RSrnO. Pa 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 659.20 ]t- +•�Y Ofi.lYtl�ibtY'.04 ®��6 ;w�r.+F��wr CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR I TEM DESCR 1 PT I ON _ 257L70 _ _ 4.05/87 _ _ -- -__. -- - . _., 036.51 2 , 0 3 6 . 5 1 257L95 09/02/87 1,307.25 LYNDE SUPPLIES 3 _ __ - ES7M1 t _ ...--------- - _ 10 ?. 6? MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT -- - - -- 8UPPLIES 257MS8 09/02/87 107.67 # MPLS STAR 6 TRUBUNE PUBLISHING - - _- __---------- .---- -___ —. _._ ----- . - -_ 1 18.86 � 257M21 09/02/87 9.45 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY SUPPLIES 9.45 * * * * ** 257M31 09/02/87 659.20 MANPOWER TEMP CONTRACT PYM ... ..... ... 257M31 ........ ... 09102/87 329.60 MANPOWER TEMP SUPPLIES 2S7M48 09/02/87 3,218.00 METRO INSP SERVICE CONTRACT PYM 3 �i 257M58 09/02/87 - 73.58 - NPLS - STAR & TR UBUNE — �____.__ PUBLISHING 257MS8 09/02/87 45.28 MPLS STAR 6 TRUBUNE PUBLISHING 1 18.86 t ..._ _- _..__..... .. .......__.. ._ .__.___..____-- 257NO9 __._._ .. . .. 09/02/87 45.15 NATL FIRE PROTECTN - SUPPLIES 45.15 257N18 09/02/8 _ 13.50 - NATL- REG PK ASSOC > BOOKS - f 257N27 09/02/87 25,486.95 NCR CORP CONTRACT PYM 25,486.95 t , q' 25 7N3 f 09/02/87 128.14 NORTH ST PAE1L GI TY ___._. UTILIT - - -_ -- 257N30 09/02/87 66.04 NORTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 21 N. - UTILITIES - 2S7N80 09/02/87 9.98 N.S.P. UTILITIES 7N8.0 _._ 0 9/ 02/87 - - 6 04 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 2.50 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2 5 7 N 8 0 09/02/87 2 .5 0 -- .. -- - N . 5 . p . __ _ _.__. _ _._ ._ -- - -� -- ____ - ._.� _ ^____ _ - - - -_ . V T I L T! ES -- ----- - 257N80 09/02/87 2.SO N.S.P. UTILITIES 2 7N8 0 ..- .____--- - - - -- 09/02/87 93.67 W.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N 09/02/8 7 123.07 - - - - IV . S. P. �__ 257N80 09/02/87 157.94 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 -- 09/02/87 - 164.64 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09102/87' 1 1 48 N. S. p. - ._. - - -. _ - - -__- _ - - -... __..... -__- UTILI TIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 98.S8 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 31.23 N.S.P. UTILITIES N80 09/02/87 80.49 - _..__ -- N. S. P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/02/87 6,377.68 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/02/87 81.83 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 0 9/ 02/8`7- - - - -- -- - - - - -- ___173.3 -- 257N80 09/02/87 167.48 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/02/87 105.52 N.S.F. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 89. OS UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 43.80 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 389:.36 N.S.P. UTILITIES 45 -- __--------- - - - - -- N . 5 ... �.. - -- UTILITIES - - - - -- 2S7N80 09/02/87 6.32 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09102/87 79.79 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/0 22.S7 N.S.P. _,. IL _.._ . - -- UTILITIES ITIES 257N80 09/02/87 35.67 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 - 18.88 N.S.P. UTILITIES 7N80 - - - -- 09/02187 - - -- - -- . _._ - 17. 74 -- - ._ __._. -N. S. P' . UTILI'fI. S - - -- - 2S7N80 09/02/87 60.69 N.S.P. UTILITIES - 257N80 _. 0 9/02/87 _ __ -- .._ - -- -- 'o -- - - - - -- -- -- -- 11.77 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S 7 NS 0 9 / 02 /8 7 15.32 -.. - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -_- - - -.. _ N.S.P. -- - -__._ - -_ -.. _. ` -U T I L I T I ES - - - - -_ --- . - - -- 257N80 09/02/87 SAS N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/02/87 -- 12.51 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N84 - -_ _______ 0 910287 _____ $3.4.8_ -- _ - ___-- ___.__ N . S . P_.- _- ______ ---- _______----- _ - - -UT I LI T I E$ - ----- .__ - - -. -- 257N80 09/02/87 13.20 N.S.P. UTILITIES N80 09/02/87 859.04 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 0902/87 37./3 N.S.P. UTILITIES 2S7N80 09/02/87 3.72 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/02/87 131.17 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/021$7 14.96 -- - __ -- -. - - -- N, 5 .- .-- _------- -_____ ._ _�__._____�_____ UTILITIES._ - -__ -_ 257NSO 09/02/87 162.34 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257NSO 09/02/87 317.74 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 O 257NSO -' 09/02/87 9.84 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257N80 09/02/87 68925 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257NSO 09 / 02/87 7 ...... - -- - - ____ N. S _. P _- ,---- _.- __ - - - - -_ -- 2S7NSO 09/02/87 526.80 N.S.P. UTILITIES 9 P a ase • 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER __.'_.._ CHECK ._.N_0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 257N80 257NSO 09/02/87 220.47 N.S.P. UTILITIES 257029 257029 09/02/87 9.49 N. S . . P REPAIR MAINT 257NS0 09/02/87 173.10 N. S. P. - _ _UTILITIES UTILITIES 257029 09/02/87 11,S33.Se OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT 10.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT 228.00 * - --- - - -- - - _- __ _ _. _ 2S7N9S 09/02/8 .6. _ .__ __ __ - - -..- NUTESON LAVERNE TRAVEL TRAINING* 257061 09102/87 6.00 OSTER ANDREA J MILEAGE 257025 09/02/87 158.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 2S7 02S 09/02/87 ISS.00 . ........ --- --- - - ---OFF ICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 316.00 ...... ..... .. 257029 257029 09/02/87 .09/02/87 5.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT 2S7029. --- 09/02/87 --- 170.00 -- 2 - s - . 00 . - - -. OCTOPUS CAR WASH -- OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT 257029 09/02/87 18.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT 10.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT 228.00 * - --- - - -- - - _- __ _ _. _ 257061 09102/87 4.03 OSTER ANDREA J MILEAGE 03 257P31 09/02/87 4.42 PECK DENNIS TRAVEL TFtAI'I 4.42 2S7P4S .... ..... 09/02/87 PITNEY BOWES LEASE 66.00 257R05 09/02/87 43.00 RAMSEY CLINIC PHYSICAL 257RO9 -0 _9_/'02!87 2.57RO9 09/02/87 6.67 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 358.41 . RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 2S7809 09/02/87 S9. 99 RA .. MSE . Y COUNTY -- C . 0 . N , TRAC -- T PYM - _ . __ 2S7RO9 09/02/87 716.81 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM 1,158.54 „._. . �rlY sit c 15i ^ "� e. .?... cv M'Y ++ wa :E`. .1al.d �... .t . ',:19� s^ . .�J. 4-1 .^t..._ ,.0 . _� ".:.. _ _ � ..0:. .. . _ .. .-.. ava+c �• ,.+ + u 'eera.r. ,. �r. mar a twmn . .• awueenR. merw..^. rvsw- .wwe�eisua�.we+e..n4e�....,�,wx .+ai:xr..aNre.. � V 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER K CHEC NO -.- _ - - -- DATE AMOUNT VENDO IT EM DESCRIPTION 257814 09/02 504.00 RANDOMEX INC DISKS 257R47 09/02/87 504.00 ROADRUNNER REPAIR MAINT 257R23 09/02/87 12.53 RAMSEY COUNTY DEPT ELECTIONS 257823 09J02J87 2.85 RAMSEY COUNTY DEPT S UPPLIES . 1 5.38 * 69.04 257839 rti 09/02/87 70.12 RICHARDS SUPPLIES - - 257839 09/02/87 15 !7 ------ RICHARDS SUPPLIES 257R39 09/02/87 5.56 - RICHARDS SUPPL IES_ - - � - w. 257R39 09/02/87 76.92 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 257R39 09/02/87 82.07 RICHARDS SUPPLIES = 39 09f 02f8T 24 : 4� ____------- -_ - -_R I Ci�iARDB ._____--- .________. _ _ _ . _ ...___ _._. _____- SUPPLIES_- 257R39 09/02/87 51.51 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 257839 -- 09/02/87 62.11 RICHARDS SUPPLIES 387.92 257R47 09/02/87 37.20 ROADRUNNER REPAIR MAINT 69.04 21257 09/02/87 40.48 RY CO SUPPLY C SUPPLIES 257R92 09/02/87 750.00 RUFFRIDGE- JOHNSON SUPPLIES 750.00 ___-- 2S7So2- _.._._ S 6 Q LOCK - SAFE 26.60 spa 4 PRO D - -- "SUP'PLTES__ - _ ^_ 257SO3 09/02/87 90.00 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 257 03 09 ___._- 45.31 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 257303 r; 09/42%87 4 7 ..26 - - - -_ SPS OFFI� - CE PROD -- - _ - REPAIR MA I 257SO3 09/02/87 16.70 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 2 T303 09/02187 45.31- SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 2 SO 09/0287 - - - - -- - - -- - ---- - - 45 - . 3t_ SPS OFFICE hRtI1 - - - -_ _ - SUPPLIES------ -- 257503 09/02/87 30.40 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES g e 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CITY CHECK REGISTER 09/02/87 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 257503 .09/02/87 225.00 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 257503 09/02/87 13.64 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 257503 OF REPAIR OFFICE PROD* -, * ---,-,- ' -- " - ' - ' - 257503 09/02/87 27.21 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 5.99...l... 1- 6. — ------ 257505 09/02/87 b0. 1 8 S 8 T OFFICE SUPPLIES ____ 60.18 257S9 09/02/87 INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 257509 09/02/87 73.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS, 257509 09/02/87 132.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 257509 09/02/87 74.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES RUBBISH 257509 09/02/87 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES — '. CHEMICAL TOILETS' 425.00 __,00/bie/s 09/02/87 9oS71.90 SHORT ELLIOT HENDR CONTRACT PYM 257S39 ' 1 2*0 0'. 77 .SHORT ELL 10 T HEN DR CONTRACT PYM Z57S39 09/02/87 15,0090.38 SHORT ELLIOT HENOR CONTRACT PYM 09/02/87 4s732.09 SHORT ELLIOT HENDR CONTRACT PYM 257S39 09/02/87 1.091S.94 SHORT ELLIOT .. . HEN DR CONTRACT PYM 31.511.08 178.00 STREICHER GUNS SUPPLIES 257S54 09/02/87 3S2 00 STRETCHER GUNS A EP A - 10 - MAINT - -- - S30-00 2S 09/02/87 25.00 SPECIALTY RADIO - .. - - . --- .- - -. —_— REPAIR M 257SSS 09/02/87 1 s.00 SPECIALTY RADIO REPAIR MAINT 257555 09/02/87 - 22.00 SPECIALTY RADIO REPAIR MAINT 62*00 2S7S66 09/02/87 57.84 57.84 257S68 09/02/87 20.00 ST PAUL CITY 257S58 09/02/87 446.04 ST _0 PAUL 83 257S58 09/02/87 163.96 - 257S58 09/02/87 38.83 REPAIR 1,627.66 2S7S66 09/02/87 57.84 57.84 257S68 09/02/87 20.00 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT ST _0 PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT REPAIR MAINT ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR MAINT ST PAUL DISPATCH PUBLISHING ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS CONTRACT PYM Page: 12 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION . ..... 20.00 257575 09/02/87 13.54 SOUTTER CHRISTINE POSTAGE . __.... 857575... - -- - - -- .__._ 09% 0217 .- 4 . 40 -- __... __ SOUTTER CHRISTINE - -__.._. _..__.___ - - -- POSTAGE_ 257575 09/02/87 4.40- SOUTTER CHRISTINE POSTAGE 257S75 09/02/87 4.40 8OUTTER CHRISTINE POSTAGE 257S75 09/ 02/87 101.34 -, SOUTTER - CHR I ST I NE -- MILEAGE 119.28 257T29 09/02/87 562.55 T.A.SCHIFSKY SONS REPAIR MAINT 5 6 2.55 . 257T30 09/02/87 109.28 TARGET SUPPLIES 257T30 09/ 02/8 7 23.6 tARGBT _____ .._---------------------- - - - - -- SUPPLIES-------_- _- __ - - -- - 257T30 .09/02/87 9.53 TARGET SUPPLIES 25.7T30 09/02/87 33.43 TARGET SUPPLIES 175.89 257T43 09/02/87 600.00 TESSMAN SEED SEED 600.00 257T60 - - - -- -- 09 /02/S� 145. 145 .00 257T65 09/02/87 3,20$.43 TKDA CONTRACT PYM 3, 20S S . 43 257T80 09/02/87 17.60 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG SUPPLIES 17.60 257T94 - -- - - - 09/02/87 - -- - -- 6007.27 07.27 TWIN CITY TESTING -_- - CONTRACT PYM 257T94 09/02/87 6,672.80 TWIN CITY TESTING CONTRACT PYM 12, 780.07 257020 ,.= 09/02/87 9.50 U.S. GOVT PRINTING MEMBERHSIP 9.50, * 257050 09/02/87 1 U NIFORMS UNL UN 2 57W 6 0 09/02 9.88 257W60 09/02/87 - 9 __ se 0 257W60 09/02/87 93.57 113.33 WESCO Wtltdd WESCO SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES a -13 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 09/02/87 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 257050 09/02/87 8.33 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS XEROX CORP LEASE 257X30 UNLIMITED - - -- - -40. S2 257050 09/02/87 288.20 _.__ UNIFORMS. UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 257U50 09/02/87 7.80 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 76.35 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 257U50 09/02/87 49.40 UNIFORMS' UNLIMITED- FORMS 257USO 09/02/87 51.45 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS ----- ---- ___627. 66 09/02187 133.22, UNITED BUSINESS SUPPLIES 133.22 257081 09/02/87 32.91 UNITED SUPPLY CORP SUPPLIES 32.1 257086 09/02/87 42.65 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL MED SUPPLIES 257086 09/02/87 16.78 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL MED SUPPLIES 59.43 257V22 09/02/87 47.00 VASKO RUBBISH REMOV RUBBISH REMOVAL 257V22 09/02/87 313.00 VASKO RUBBISH REMOV RUBBISH REMOVAL 257W41 09/02/87 100.00 WENDELL RINGHEIM CO REPAIR MAINT 100.00 257W50 09/02187 --- E B E__R_ T k - d _S" E__ t H I N_C - S U_ P__ P L - I - - E_ - 14.00 2 57W 6 0 09/02 9.88 257W60 09/02/87 - 9 __ se 0 257W60 09/02/87 93.57 113.33 WESCO Wtltdd WESCO SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 257X30 09/02/87 5.24 XEROX CORP LEASE 257X30 09/02/87 8.74 XEROX CORP LEASE 257X30 09/02/87 . _ _ _- 25.68 XEROX CORP LEASE 257X30 09/02/8T. - - - - - -- - -40. S2 E-j- L KSE— 257X30 09/02/87 25.68 XEROX CORP LEASE -volt "m . _ .'_i.._. '. k .. :.. ; ..'_. •... t.Y: ., ... . 4- ...+er 1 - tl7t]!7' O- C^b'w>SI.p .L ...wM- Yxil"P .. /.. wA0. .✓ ..._ J. . r. l.. .. Page: T4 _] ._.. .t.t n .- r.. . . _ .. 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO.. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP 257X30 0.9/02/87 50.52 XEROX CORP LEASE 156.38 36, 7 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL 1 , 133.. 89_ - -- --------- __.__.- FUND 03 _ TOTAL HYDRANT .CHARGE 7 FUND 12 TOTAL STREET CONSTR STi: 13 TOTAL c, I. P. 36.66 FUND 36 TOTAL 83 -1 FROST AV ADI 9,578.57 FUND 45 TOTAL 84 -12 BEAM W OF 181880.25 -- - - - - -- FUND 63 TOTAL 86 -3 CENTURY AVE. . $1 . - - -_ _ _----------- - -..__ FUND 64 TOTAL 86 -4 CTY RD. _ C&HW' 3,208.43 FUND 65 TOTAL 86 -5 HILLWD D.R —E _- _- -...._ _ ___.- ___.______ . .__ ----- 1 _a.J. 83 9. 36 FUND 73 TOTAL 86 -15 WTR D ISTR I` ; 8, 588.74 FUND 76 TOTAL _ 86 -22 H ILLCREST 2,206.11 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER Fl 3072.46 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE 6 EQUIP I 128,519.80 TOTAL aT4 b INDICAT - -- - - - -___ -- - - ' s I i I I I I - I S - -I T F M J_ - FIN N��iN E I� � E _ -_ R � �_ 7, C a; �' _T Q�:.�.�L__-=E_ DATE 09/01/87 PROGRAM.PR10 NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBE NAME 4 C I T Y O F M A P L E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP pay\olL PAY � I a 10816 02- -1801 Mc GU i RE _ 10817 02--5671 BEHM MICHAEL A 2330. 59 LOIS - N 852,o25 , DIVISION 02 CITY MANAGER 4 1 O � - 44 7-4 r1 �-- - -- 7 • �' 10819 10-6523 SWANSON, JR. LYLE E 893u63 t DIVISION 10 CITY HALL MAINT 1583.35 108:0 12 -0166 CURE LARRY J 2 •r• �.4�.4O 10822 12-5905 OSTE R ANDREA J 665w0 DIVISION j { i T 18 EMERGENCY SERVICES 1065.05 1082 21--1078 FAUST DANIEL F 1846n28 DIVISION 21 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION f : !M. , 10825 22 --4446 MATHEYS ALANA K s 868' 25 1082.6 22-7550 V I GNALO DELORES 1"7 A •1 25 8 5 L... L L.� EL- 1 108 :8 22- -9267 ANDERSON CA ROLE J 1146. 46 1 DIVISION 22 ACCOUNTING NT I NG �� ,�.�67. 31 10829 31-2198 AU REL I US LUC I LLE E 1705w48 R JEHIMIM t: 8148 40- r L i i 3 182a84 DATE 09/01187 C I T Y O F M A P L E W 0 ' PROGRAM P R 1 0 _ PAY ROLL CHECK REGISTER REP NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY_ 10831 33 -0547 � KELSEY caNN i E L .� 387a _ 1083x:: .�3 -1614 BROWN BARBARA E 67w VERNON T 1308. 68 4" .10834 33- 4394 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 415w83 10835 33 -6105 CARLE JEANETTE E 8136 - ----- �iQ -- 8r� �n�-- MORELL I RAYMOND J .I 3 i i i t -'1f-- ixtE - Ljj` T' f'�. ... L.. 4 42-1364 ARNOLD -- i 10837 41 --1717 COLLINS KENNETH V I 1917w48 10838 41 -2356 R I CH I E CA ROLE L 716s39 j our 1-2934 Leo A.A 10852 10840 41 -3183 NELSON ROBERT D 1675a88 t 10841 41 -7636 OMATH JOY E ?20.25 - -.%-- L 3 ins MeESLorT I L. FN I I.On"nu 4 i 1 i r 10843 42 -0130 ., ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1455. 26 10844 10845 42 -02 51 STILL VERNON T 1308. 68 4" DON . x 10846 4 2 — �. 0 318 NELSON CAROL M 1408. 06 10847 42--0350 MORELL I RAYMOND J 1,32. 68 ( I 10845 ... L.. 4 42-1364 ARNOLD DAVID L 5J Q . 1455. 26 10850 42 - 1577 DANICK JOHN J 1518.08 4 2 Eq0l a' Leo I 8 : 2 10852 42-1899 CAHANES ANTHONY G 1675.88 10853 42 CLAU50N DALE K 1357a48 L 3 ins MeESLorT I L. FN I I.On"nu 19 - 5 10855 42--2115 ATCHISON JOHN H 1396v68 10855 42- - P ELTIER WILLIAM F 1455o26 _ atc- Q0979 Z €fitK T� 10858 42 -3243 WELCHLIN CABOT V 1075.72 10855 42--3551 LANG RICHARD J 1435.11 10861 42 -4516 HERBERT :M ICHAEL J 1574.20 1 0862 42-6119 D REGE R RICHARD C 1455o26 i i DATE 09/01/87 C I T Y O F M A P L E W 0 PROGRAM PR1 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPi 4 NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME. PAY 4 :5, 133Er68 10864 4�.�-8L�c6 STAFNE GREGORY L 10885 4E --8434 BECKE R RONALD I3 133E. 68 8�-- _ _j � 1.067 42--9204 STOCKTON DERRELL T 1308.64 10883 42 --495 PAULOS --JR. PAUL G 557 2 . J# t f 10470 4 3--0009 ._ 133. 68 KAKIS FLINT D 1 108? 1 43►- -04f�6► HEINZ STEPHEN PHEW J 1541.40 E &A 3— 117a t " µ , 10873 43- x.:'05` THOMALLA DAVID J • 1541.40 t ! 10874 43--2201 YOUNG REN JAMES G 1441 r ? 1 1 0476 43- -6071 VO RWE RK ROBERT E 1405 44 1- 4 I _ e 10877 43 --7418 - � SE RGE RON J JOSEPH A 5 1350 48 _ . is 0 i i I ;t { JAMES M 1431 r 88 1 0879 45--1478 EMBERTSON s: � M 10880 45-3333 WILLIAMS DUANE J e 1 256r 88 y DIVISION $` 45 FIRE PREVENTION 2 x.684. �C ,6 1 9, %.j %-I 1088 =' 46--032 1048,E 46 --0389 STAH�IKE JULIE A 827 t 4 ' DOYER SCOTT Irl K 745. 85 ` 10885 46-- 4801 .. E - m RYAN Ila MICHAEL. P im =A r 1457o75 5 .a 10486 46-5919 J. V.1 ca 4 CY NELSON KAREN A 868r 25 t v0 ' 47 vi 10888 46--7:36 FL.AUGHER mrlrHwlm ...— — JAYME - L a 868r 2 �5 r R DIVISION 46 DISPATCHING SERV 7145 R 26 53 5.3 5 F i DIVISIUN 5E STREET MAINTENANCE 10475 ■91 10902 53-1010 10904 .' 3- -25``2 � 10905 5- -3570 E 10907 53- -50£9 10908 53-6109 ELIAS P R I EBE AHL—,JR. COLLINS GE I SSLER DATE (01/87 G C A M C I T Y O F M A P L E W O PROGRAM PR10 8.1�5 ■ 89 PAYROLL CHECK REGI REP( i E RK j 3 NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME i 10910 58- -1014 10911 58-1590 NADEAU MULWEE PAY AL W 1119. 38 1021 ■ 78 716w25 10889 51- -0267 BARTA MARIE L 10890 5 1- -6872 HA I DER KENNETH G 1795.08 8V i 4 y + 1 ' f "f z , 13Y t .1 0892 52 --0547 MEYER GERALD W 11 Esc. 79 { 1089,E 52 -1241 KANE MICHAEL R 1175o 10895 52-3473 i:LAU I NG HENRY F 1119m03 10896 52 -4037 HELEY RONALD J 1064 ■ 99 y } ` s ir �i �. i.r Mr • w - ---- - FA , . 10898 ,5t�. -4847 THtJRN PAUL E 464. ,� 1 j 3 S 1 0899 52 -6224 TEVL I N J R. HARRY ,J 1133u35 ' `• ,_,......:_# 1 .r���.�5� -'' �..,.- - -- - - ff ; : 1 J r, f la� a t -- 1090152 -8314 CASS WILLIAM C 1497v66 DIVISIUN 5E STREET MAINTENANCE 10475 ■91 10902 53-1010 10904 .' 3- -25``2 � 10905 5- -3570 E 10907 53- -50£9 10908 53-6109 ELIAS P R I EBE AHL—,JR. COLLINS GE I SSLER JAMES WILLIAM: RAY STEVEN WALTER G C A M 1 203s 45 � 2 1�.0�...41 1489n66 663n58 13 59. 59 DIVISION 53 ENGINEERIN f YV 8.1�5 ■ 89 i i E RK 87d ■ i 10910 58- -1014 10911 58-1590 NADEAU MULWEE EDWARD GEORGE AL W 1119. 38 1021 ■ 78 i I• DATE 09/01/87 C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 1 4 ------- 4 . 013X PROGRAM PR10 f% Earl, MIT! MT PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP! • 10918 61 - 10656 BRENNER Ltd IS GR05S NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME BARBARA A 359n721 L -%3 7-4-24& PAY- eemr, - EET -1-L. 9- 1091 58-1720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 142410 86' 360000 10922 10913 58-2563 BREHEIM ROGER W 1110 14 --fose362-337f 90 AND ON, 58 -EDSO N DAV iD 10924 62-3915 :3 10915 58-5993 OWEN GERALD C 401.85 .; DIVISION 58 SAN SEWER OPERATION 810 00 I JLL ff.1 Q 6 6178o33 = Y .... inr.Lr. T 109L1 59-1000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1161 85. f :: DIVISION 59 VEH & EQUIP MAINT' 1175u45 10928 1161u85 1 4 ------- 4 . 013X 6 1 9 f% Earl, MIT! MT • 10918 61 - 10656 BRENNER Ltd IS 10919 61-1993 � ;�'� ---- '-'- fj j Y KRUMMEL BARBARA A 359n721 L -%3 7-4-24& LEJ i eemr, - EET -1-L. 9- 10921 62 -1301 THURIK SCOTT 360000 10922 62-2111 TRAVERS DANIEL L 110u50 --fose362-337f 90 AND ON, rx u JD r. rRx T jeI3 oa 10924 62-3915 LINDORFF. DENNIS P 1024,s23 10925 62-4097 -- - lr_ & YUKER 2 WALTER A 810 00 I JLL ff.1 Q 6 ;R era.-&tl r. i = Y .... inr.Lr. T ROLAND El -1068ndg 10927 62-5506 MARUSKA MARK A 1175u45 10928 62-6943 SCHNEIDER GREGORY W 420,nO@ 7rL2"19 BLJRKL- - %-a 10930 62-7968 TURNER GARY D 250m00 10931 62-8182 GERMAIN DAVID A 1082a65 62 in -7 1- --s vs in= k I k 1 r-, Ir Jet %L.0 %J rl T I Ir LT - v - z left P A Rm rwr r. NFt 08; 10933 63-0170 STRAUS LAURA J 231.75 10934 63-1245. DOUGHTY LINDA R 25.00 • DATE 09/01/87 PROGRAM P R 10 C I T Y O F M A P L E W U PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP( NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 10935 63-1 DE MARS SANDRA L 72,x 10936 63 -2015 EAU RASH DONNA F 72m50 T- 0 - 93 - 7 2 - --- 8,� � 5 -, RVE RHODA AMY 10 938 63- -2685 KORL I N PATRICIA E 221. 85 10939 63— •x.:`887 HOLLAND ANDREA M 1368 50 10550 63.5-9 3 all F I SCHE R 10541 63--3628 G RAF MICHAEL J 238u 10542 63-- 3.744 VASQUE Z MICHAEL A 405. 6 JANET 46- -.--- —WAR o n_ v - - -- -- G S-4 a-- 10544. J ..LM ) now 63--4605 CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J 257. 00 A V.1 -1-r.1 Q�-- ui al C2IL WUUFMZDMHK Kit' BERLY J 2 05 u 8@ --� 63 -�--- --. T MAN— - Ate ---_� ,�--- 10547 63-6462 RHODA AMY E 78. 80 10548 63-6786 CL.EAVELAND KATHERINE M 24-8 10550 63.5-9 3 F I SCHE R PATRICIA R 237.80 t DIVISION � i 63 RECREATION I Uhf P ROG RAMS 4066n32 r i 10551 64.0508 GREW JANET M 892u2 64566 ORR 10553 64• -4624 � HO RSNELL JUDITH A 689.16 DIVISION 64 NATURE CENTER 1726.72 10354 71--0124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 74 5. 85 t5r 7t-055t OLSON .. # 10956 71-3174 WEGWERTH JUDITH A •-� 4�0. 47 i 10557 71 -8754 LIVINGSTON JOYCE L 270852 t DIVISION 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADM I N a i 3138a ., 7 2-7178 1 0555 72 -- 8505 JOHNSON T Mom RANDALL L �. . 1161.0@ DIVISION 72 PLANNING 2397.58 DATE 09/01/87 PROGRAM PR10 C 1- T Y O F M A P L E. W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP 0 w lmw 1� lmw NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME. PAY 10960 73-0.677 DST ROM MARJORIE 1391s26 10961 7►-1942 CARVER NICHOLAS N' 1059n45 DIVISION 73 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2450m71 a s i 1- 52 '153 �4 5-:5 56 57 J F 10963 74-5873 X-xr� IL, I vvrlv R rx T GRANGER GREGORY t A 180m00 I DIVISION 74 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 1361.85 FUND NOT ON FILE GRAND TOTALS 140726o42 140726a42 • . Action by C6uncil:it MEMORANDUM Endorsed-,--.__ To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Modifie From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio Re eoted Subj: Gloster Fence Date. Date: September 8, 1987 Introduction At the time of the renovation of Gloster Park which created a new soccer field and holding ponds, it was discussed with the City Council that suitable fencing should be placed between the home. on the south of the park and the soccer field. Our purpose for installing the fence is to keep the soccer balls in the p ark and secondly to protect the home which is very close to the lot line. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council approve the expenditure of $1,500 for a chainlink fence for Gloster Park with funds provided through the Commercial PAC Charge. AGENDA #—Z:7 MEMORANDUM TO Ma and Cit Council FROM* C ity M a n a g e r RE: Furniture Bi,ds DATE: September 2, 1987 INTRODUCTION Action b Counci Endorsed...., Modif ied Rej ected Date Bids were solicited for fifteen. .(__15) cbafrs for. the Council Chamber, one (,1) for Parks and Recreation ...two (.2) for the Police Department and a table and. ch.ai-r's for. the reception area as wet I as a desk, credenza and sea for the pity Mana office.. Mc:n I (Zq TM Six bids were received. B takin the low bid for each sub -�-.total,, the total cost will i s be $13,057,92, Thle mone Included fn the 1987 Bud and would be char as follows: Council C4airs, Mana Desk, Seatin Etc. Police Qhairs Parks & Recreation Chair Reception Area RECOMMENDATION Dfvision 01 $65611,00 Division 02 4,756,49 Division 46 807,00 Division: 61 413.00 Division 02 450,44 it is recommended tha the purchase of the above described furniture be authorized based on low bidder. MAM: 1 n Tabulation of Furniture Quotes - 9/1/87 Bidder: S &T Office Products $3,434,70 $1,413.90 $619.90. $8,704.20 $494,20 $1 $500.80 $16,216.80 Pink Supply 3. 1 543.64* 7. 535.93 884,55 430.00 14 Metro Systems 3 1,571.05 594.00 8 494.35 1 463.00 15 General Office Products 3 1 588.56 7 .4.71,59 No Bid 447.00 13,839069 Business Furniture Inc. 3 1 573,00 6,611 *00* 450 *44* 807.00* 448.00 13,502.44 P. M. Johnson, Inc. 3 1 565 *00 7 536.00 870800 413.00* 14 * Low Bidder 3,012,85 1 543.64 .6 450.44 807 413.00 13,037,93 Maplewood City Hall Bid Quotation Summary Sheet Due Date: August 28, 1987 by 1:00 PM Do not bid any alternate to these specifications. The award of this bid may be split among bidders. An vendor may y choose to offer no bid on any part of the specifications. It is the responsibility of the vendor to set all furniture in place at the job site. Pricing on this bid must remain valid for thirty days (September 2 8) . Ins tructions: Write unit pricing on product specification pages and write the extended pricing on this summary page. Add any freight /delivery /installation on a separate line and submit these figures with the total cost. DO NOT ADD SALES TAX. Enclose copies of each product's specification page with this summary sheet. Bids are to be returned to: Mr. Mike McGuire Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood , MN 55169 Specification by Manufacturer and Location: JOFCO / Manager's Office (includes item codes M1, M2 M3 M4 ) Total Extended Price: $ Freight /Delivery /Install $ Grand Total JOFCO $ Estimated Delivery on Site BERNHARDT / Manager's Office (includes item codes M5 and M6 ) Total Extended Price $ Freight /Delivery /Install $ Grand Total BERNHARDT , $ Estimated Delivery on Site I 4 TAYLOR / Manager's Office (includes item code M7 ) Total Extended Price Freight /Delivery /Install Grand Total TAYLOR Estimated Delivery on Site VECTA / Council Chambers (includes item codes C1 and C2 ) Total Extended Price Freight /Delivery /Install Grand Total VECTA Estimated Delivery on Site S S S NATIONAL / Manager's Reception Area (includes item codes R1 and R2 ) Total Extended Price $ Freight /Delivery /Install $ Grand Total JOFCO $ Estimated Delivery on site ALL STEEL / Police Department (includes item code P1) Total Extended Price Freight /Delivery /Install Grand Total ALL STEEL Estimated Delivery on Site 5 S 9 'I VECTA / Parks and Recreation Director (includes item code D1) Total Extended Price $ Freight /Delivery /Install $ Grand Total VECTA $ Estimated Delivery on Site Grand Total of All Items Bid $ Signed: Date: (Name) Co. Name Address (City / State / Zip Item Quantities/ Description%Modei Number/ Cade vacations Dimensions/Fabrics/Colors anager' s Off j Manufacturer NNENOMMOM M1 1 Jofco 3500 Series Medium Oak Finish on American White Oak Model # F3572 •36 x 72 Desk with recessed back panel, 3/4 peds: Box /File left Sox /Box /Box right Standard with Locks M2 1 Jofco 3500 Series Medium Oak Finish on American White Oak 73 7/8" x 18" x 72" high Custom Credenza /Hutch consists of: 1 Model # TU3573 - H Modular Top 2 Model # 2F3522N Double File Unit 1 Model # HU3574 Hutch Unit 1 Model # KBCD -30 Computer Keyboard Drawer Pedestals on each end with center kneespace. Keyboard . installed center of kneespace. .Grommet located at center back of modular top must be special ordered. Item Quantities/ DesctiptioctiModel Number/ Code Locations Dimensions/Fabrics/Coiois M3 1 � M4 1 2 M5 1 1 M6 1 1 anager ' s Office Manuf acturer Jofco 3500 Series Medium Oak Finish on Americ White Oak Model # ST3528 Square Occasional Table 28" x 28" x 22 3/4 It High Jofco Medium Oak Finish on American White Oak Model # 5080 Sled Base Side Chair 23 x 26 1/2 x 33 1/2 High COM: 2 1/2 yards Maharam Wool Jaspe - Color # 5 Tango Bernhardt Columbia.Series Model # 5755 Two - seater short sofa 57 1/2" x 33" x 29 High Fabric 3020 - 060 Color: Amethyst, Bernhardt Columbia Series Model # 5752 Chair, 32 1/2" x 33" x 29 H Fabric 3020 - 060 Color: Amethyst Item Quantities/ Description/Model Number/ Code Locations Dimensions/Fabrics/Colors olice Department Manufacturer 'I P1 3 k1l Steel ask Chair Penta Series odel # P271 -005 ingle Action Posture Control Prong Base onochromatic Arms, Base, Shell olor: Chocolate (SO2) abric: Wollaby #WY480 of or : Shrimp arks and Recre ation Director D1 1 ecta Model # 752267 High Back swivel tilt onference Chair on Is tandard dual wheel arpet Casters ectamatic Ht. Adjustment abric: Grade 4000 owns #326 Black olished Aluminum 5 Prong ase I F Item Quantities/ Description/Modei Number/ Cade Locations Dimensions/Fabrics/Colors ouncil Cham Manufacturer l C1 13 Vecta Model # 752267 High back swivel tilt Conference Chair on - Standard dual wheel Carpet Casters Vectamatic Ht* Adjustment COM: 2 1/2 yds Maharam Wool Jaspe Color #5 Tango Polished Aluminum 5 Prong Base C2 2 Vecta Model # 752271 Management back swivel tilt Conference chair on Standard dual wheel carpet casters Vectamatic Ht. Adjustment COM: 2 1/2 yds Maharam Wool Jaspe Color #5 Tango Polished Aluminum 5 Prong Base x . � s MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Permit Renewal LOCATION: 1955 Prosperity APPLICANT /OWNER: Northeast Metro Alano DATE: September 3, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction r -� .Action by Council Endorsed.. Mod.ifie R ejecte Date The applicant is requesting a renewal of the conditional use permit to use the structure at 1955 Prosperity Road for A.A., Alanon, and Alateen meetings. Discussion There is no record of any complaints having been made to the city regarding the operation of this facility. All conditions of the permit have been complied with. Recommendation Approval of a five-year extension for the conditional use permit issued to the Northeast Metro Alano to hold meetings at 1955 Prosperity Road, REFERENCE Past Actions 11- 20 -80: Council approved a conditional use permit to use 1955 Prosperity as a meeting place for Northeast Metro Alano Society. Ap was subject ect to: Y PP � 1. Review by council after one year of operation. If of ter one year no substantial problems have arisen from the Alano Club, the permit may be renewed for another five years. 2. The applicant shall provide the. city with written permission from the church approving the use of their parking lot. 3. Inspection by the fire marshal for compliance with fire and safety codes, 4. Security lighting to be provided in the parking lot as required by the director of public safety. 1 -7 -82: Council renewed this permit for three years. Planning Section 36 -442 (e) : "All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by .the council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one year review, the council may specify an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the ermit at the time of the initial P t al or subsequent reviews. A conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses..." j 1 Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Letter of Request Z CQUYTY R OAD F � l •C" < IL W = E DGEHILL MD.. ca t 6S h = DEMONT AVE. W C ROOK AVE. � _ 3 61 �'• ac AV �� I{ fA S E X '! GERVAfs AVE.QERVAIJ AV © Ev- OV .� - - -- �VIKIIM DR. AST 1- ` C OPE J LARK AYE. wi 25 Co T R [ LELAN] j ° 25 0 �+ o JUN TION I AVIE. v l U RKE � �, � ELORIDG h pN > EL YON t v KILL 1rA � H � J o RYAN- R. A I n• 28 E+ " 4 ri FROST v .� ! ! 27 �� t w Fri N AVE. 62 g 3 a W • a FRISSIE AVE. 3 b AV Wok efie/d Q $ 0 PH IA AVE Lake PRI J E A GJ : - P/�o/en n - 62 b. o W A P IL NT EU SHERREAVE S A EN AVE. OP AVE. -JF LARK -AVE M : ~ LARK AVE. t~ h M t � LAURIE R0. cc LAURIE RO 49 z Y J Q _ W = z AVE pq Z t AVE. 8 KE AVE AVE. wZaWOID r W (AA) W PueLIG WORKS AVE L� 1 . _ . o AV E. = NA D 00 ) AVE. Soo . t 28 1� W • 2 29 SIM 3 z PRICE N • I - '� 5 LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 4 N 4 ri h A M s a W • W Wok efie/d SOP AVE ,. Loge ws z PRI J E A GJ : - V Soo . t 28 1� W • 2 29 SIM 3 z PRICE N • I - '� 5 LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 4 N rr O� �a 0 .may 1 .,, .. y 4 f 5 _ •� 1 Z 2 ! • 3i - cc e s; s 1� -- G 0 1 O 4 O w ,r O .. Q J L E4�.1 v =' �s a � � r IVE lit s / v� t f O ' ' G 1 7 � PROPERTY LINE MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N 4A J -ft I .. S ZO 31 I �• ie z s� � � � Z fy ;; ata 030 � w S'�• '`2��� .` i fift /S5 X fa J zi - Ll a xr o Z 1 Zb wo o a] 3 � L w1i 14 t r t 122 22 r •'• . • _ + ! �III-`rte _• 4 I . 41M 4� IL i a mom dl II-Al / �t w 40 1- . PROPERTY LINE MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N 1955 Prosperity - St.Paul,Mn. 55109 612 -777 -0405 _ August 24, 1987 City of Maplewood 1830 .past Co. Road B Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Mr Geoff Olson Director of Community Development We would like to request that the City of Maplewood renew our conditional use permit. Our non - profit organization provides a -place for the meetings of A.A. , Alanon, & Alateen. This facility serves persons from the Maplewood area as well as other close in areas, We have been aware of the residential setting and as such, we have taken care to make fir_ ouse fit in to the surroundings. r x Jame sue' land President Northeast Metro Alano 5 Attachment 3 ,s s A 1 is i MEMORANDUM Act: -On by Coun TO: City Manager Mod- tfi.ed FROM: Director of Community Development Rejected..,.. SUBJECT: Tax— Exempt Financing -- Beaver Creek Apartments Date DATE: September 8, 1987 Introduction Final approval of tax — exempt financing for the Beaver Creek Apart— ments is being requested. Background Council gave preliminary approval to this financing on February 11, 1985. Discussion This proposal will meet all of the city's criteria for tax— exempt financing. Recommendation Approval of the attached resolution giving final approval for tax — exempt financing for the Beaver Creek Apartments. jw Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Resolution ��. ,� � • • • � � � • • , �i • • 570M RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING AUTHORIZATION OF A PROJECT AND HOUSING PROGRAM UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C (MUNICIPAL HOUSING PROGRAMS) AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE'OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGEE REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND BONDS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED TO FINANCE THE PROJECT AND PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Council has previously received a proposal from Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Company ") that the City undertake to finance a certain Project and multifamily rental housing program for such Project as herein described, pursuant to Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes (the "Act ") and on December 27, 1985 authorized such project and P rogram and issued its $8,500,000 Variable Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership Project) (the "1985 Bonds ") to finance such Project. The Project consists of the acquisition and construction of a multi -Tamil rental facility containing Y y taining Attachment Two J t 180 units and related improvements including parking facilities in the City. 2, The Company now desires to refund the 1985 Bonds through the issuance by the City of its $8,500,000 Multifamily Mortgage Refunding Bonds, Series 1987 (Beaver Creek Apartments Project). The Project as described above will facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities.for .residents of the City, encourage the development of housing facilities designed for occupancy by persons of low or moderate income and assist such persons in obtaining decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they can afford; encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and will otherwise further the policies and purposes of the Act; and the findings made in the Preliminary Resolution adopted by this Council on February 11, 1985 with respect to the Project and in the final authorizing resolution for the 1985 Bonds on December 23, 1985 are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved. 3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of September 1, 1987, between the City as Lender and the Company as Borrower (the "Loan Agreement "), the City loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to refund the 1985 Bonds. The Basic Payments to be made by the Company . 2 f G under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to roduce revenue e sufficient to pay , the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its rights to the Bas' • 9 is Payments and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee ") as security for r .payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of September 1, 1987 (the "Indenture ") between the City and the Trustee. The acquisition, construction operation and occupancy of the Project will conform to the terms and conditions of a Regulator Agreement the " Y 9 ( Regulatory Agreement ") dated as of December 1, 1985 and amended and restated as of September 1, 1987 between the City, he Company Y P Y and the Trustee. and a Declaration of Restrictive ov C enants dated as of December 27, 1985 and amended and restated as of September 1, 1987 (the "Declaration"), both executed by the Company and to be recorded as a covenant and restriction running with the land on which the Project is located. 4. This Council, b action taken on Y February 11, 1985, and after a public hearing hereon ad • g opted a resolution giving preliminary approval to a ro osal to finance ' P P a protect substantially the same as the Project; and on or about December 19, 1985, the Minnesota Housing Finance inance Agency gave approval to the proposed financing program for the Project, 3 N This Council, by action taken on December 23, 1985, adopted a resolution authorizing the Project and the issuance of the 1985 Bonds. 5. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds forms of the following documents have been submitted to the Council for approval: (a) The Loan Agreement. (b) The - Indenture. (c) The Regulatory Agreement. (d) The Declaration (not executed by the City), 6. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) the Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred to above constitutes a Project authorized by the Act and the financing ro ram for the P 9 Project is authorized by the Act; (b) the purpose of the Project and the program for the Project is, and the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by the acquisition, construction and equipping of rental housing facilities for assisting persons of low and moderate income within the City to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they can afford; 4 0 (c) the acquisition, construction and installation of the Project, the issuance and sale of.the Bonds, the execution and deliver b Y Y the City of the Loan.Agreement the Indentu ► re, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Regulatory g y Agreement (collectively the "Agreements ") and the performance of all covenants and agreements g s of the City contained in the Agreements, and o g f all other acts and things required under the constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and City Charter to make the Agreements valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act; (d) it is desirable that the Company be authorized, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement and Declaration, which terms and conditions the City determines to be necessary, desirable and proper, to acquire and install the Project by such means as shall be available to the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, subject to the terms of the aforesaid agreements; 5 0 (e) it is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture; (f) the Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenue sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, interest on, and the purchase price of, the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory Agreement also provide that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against-all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory Agreement; (g) as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not 101 subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any Y exercise by the City of its taxing powers to a P pay any of the Bonds or the interest or remium if P , any, thereon, or the purchase price thereof, or to enforce payment thereof against an property 9 y p p rty of the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance legal or equitable, upon any property f the City y except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee e under the Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that the Bonds are issued without moral obligation on the part of the state or its political subdivisions, and that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are a able solely P Y y the revenues pledged to the payment thereof and that the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation; and (h) a public hearing on the Project was duly held by the City Council on February , 1985. Vh t 6. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the provisions of Section 9 of this Resolution, the forms of the Agreements and exhibits thereto are approved substantially in the form submitted and on file in the office of the City Clerk. The Agreements, in substantially the'form submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Clerk. Any other documents and certificates contemplated by the Agreements or necessary to the transaction described above shall be executed by the appropriate City officers. Copies of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein described shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in said Loan Agreement and Indenture. 7. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and this Resolution. The Bonds shall mature and be subject to mandatory purchase as set forth in the Indenture. The principal amount of the Bonds and the rate of interest on the Bonds shall be such rate or rates as the Mayor, the City Clerk, the Bond Purchaser and the Company shall agree to, but not to exceed 9.5% per annum. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated, the original Bond Purchaser, shall purchase the Bonds for an amount not less than 950 of the principal amount of the Bonds and the Mayor U t s and City Clerk are authorized to enter into the Bond Purchase Agreement in a form approved by the City or Attorney, The Mayor Y and City Clerk are authorized and directed to re are and P P execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Bond Purchaser. 8: The Mayor and City Clerk and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to p rep are and furnish to the Bond Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and P P 9 records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may required uired to show the q facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore .furnished, shall constitute representations of the City y as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 9. The approval hereby given to the various docu- ments referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the City officials authorized herein. to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said it C y 9 i i A. Attorney and City fficials Y are .hereby ,authorized to approve said changes on behalf o ' f the City. The execution of any instrument by the-appropriate • officer or officers of the Cit Y herein authorized shall be c • conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents- - in accordance ce with the terms hereof. In the absence (or inabilit y) of the officials auth- orized herein to execute an of t • Y he documents herein referred to, the documents may be executed b • Y any officer or member of the City acting in their behalf. Passed: September 14 1987 Mayor Attest City Clerk (SEAL) 10 r T f MEMORANDUM Acti.o.n. by Counc f:, pl Endorsed TO: City Manager Mo d i f y. a d,.., .., FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Rejected.,.., SUBJECT: LOCATION: Time Extension--Preliminary Plat Ds.te Highway 61, North of Gervais APPLICANT /OWNER: Robert and Flora Mi ler PROJECT: � gg Miggler Addition DATE: August 14, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting a one -year time extension for the Mi le gg r Addition preliminary plat. (Refer to the letter on a e 6. P g ) Background Council approved the preliminary plat on September 22 1986 but did not.resolve the zoning issues until April 27, 1987. (Refer to Past Actions.) Discussion To resolve the zoning issues, the applicant agreed to r a dro Lot Two Block Two and enla .the adj oini P • •g � ng lots, as shown on page 5. The conditions of preliminary plat approval should be amended accordingly. gly' There have not been any other changes to city code or with nearby land uses. to justify any other changes in the approved plat conditions, PP p onditions. A t extension is justified because the applicant could not develop a marketing plan during the first seven months of reliminar Y plat P approval. During this time, council was debating how the site should be zoned. An illness in the applicant's family as delayed ayed their progress this summer. Recommendation Approve a one -year time extension for the Miggler Addition relimin p ary plat subject to amending the September 22, 1986, conditions of approval as follows (additions are underlined, deletions are crossed out) : 110 Submittal of a 66- foot -wide right -of -way easement to the city engineer for the extension of proposed Mi P P ggler Drive to Gervais Avenue. The applicant shall pay all costs for acquirin this g easement, including any costs for acquisition by condemnation. This easement shall not encroach upon the city's property abutting to the east, 20 Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with required surety u i red p for required public improvements, including the construction of the street and water. main extension to Gervais Avenue and to ua g rantee removal of the truck farm structures that are In conflict with ordinance requirements based on p lat lines-, 30 The water main to be constructed in proposed Miggler Drive shall 11 be looped to the water main in Gervais Avenue, 40 Delete Lot Two, Block Two and renumber Lots Three t- hrnilgh F; S ,A t o Lots Two through Four. Lot One., Block Two shall b_ Pnla y,pr7 to include the west 185+ feet of the former Lot Two. The former Lo Three shall e enlarged to include the easterly 115+ feet of the former Lot Two, 540 Phasing of the plat may be permitted provided: a. Development is limited to Lots One,,Two and Three of Blocks One -ate -Twe- and Lots One and Two ate- Llr e- of Block, revised in condition four) until street and water ter main are extended to Gervais Avenue. The area not being developed in first phase shall be shown as an outlot g p the . b. A developer's agreement shall be s • submitted with the required surety for all public improvements needed to serve the first phase and to guarantee the removal of an truck farm structures ctures in violation of setback requirements, This agreement shall include the submission g 11 n of a temporary 108 -foot diameter cul -de- sac easement to the city and construction of a 100-foot diameter temporary cul -de -sac. The bulb of the cul -de -sac shall be constructed to the east line of Lot Tree T fas revised in condition four), Block Two. c. Fire flows in proposed Miggler Drive must meet the fire code. 6. Miggler Drive shall be a 66- foot -wide right-of-way, g y 70. "Miggler Drive" shall be renamed "Brooks Avenue." 80 City engineer approval of final grading, drainage and ' plans, g g utility 2 REFERENCE Past Actions 9-8-1860 1". Council rezoned the easterly two- thirds of the site from R -1, single' dwelling, to CO, commercial office. The applicant had requested M -1, light manufacturing zoning. 2 Council amended the land use plan to designate the proposed street connection between the Highway 61 Frontage Road and Gervais Avenue as a minor collector street. 9-22-8 6 Council conditionally approved the nine -lot Miggler Addition preliminary plat. (Refer to the recommendation for the conditions.) 4 -27 -87 1. Council amended the plat to drop Lot Two and adjust the property lines for Lots One and Three as shown on page 5. 2. Council adjusted the M -1 /C0 zoning district boundary to coincide with the east line of revised Lot One, Block Two and the east line of Lot Two, Block One. '1 J Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Revised Preliminary Plat and Zoning District Boundaries 30 ,Letter of Request 3 7TY OF R / �.�� . � R COUNTY R F 7LF R . 1! , F R R 4 Ml o . 8C YFF R ' Mt MI F� F M i ' COUNTY DEL A NC v F.• A ° �v � F 4; F '• !11 i / M WW 0 � P AVE 6C BC R2-4• R P' F o �� • M • `M I F R R c WA HILL R 1J)C R 0 a 2 L Y R 13C M 8C .. MI ..J...•_ 6-0.0-«. r A7 W. j � 'Oel f R • o RoL R �j LOCATION MAP � FF 1 ! 1 Miggler Addition property• 4 Attachment 1 • r 44U ' NOVA& men Duff • •• -• , V r•A A10 . • , ; s • , " ,a • 61An.tw000 / -.. • ••• - 1 � i —_'•— `„�, *mi - -•. • o• •+� ` ^10 • �.. • - r _ • .. ♦ � • 10 00 ♦- :� /- • • .�, •, `�. •y • I •• •- .• �• - •, t x 111 CK 2 t r • V .• •• Ir • • • 1 _ �••. ��..�, do •, ' ``•�• Y • ' 10 , x', • ` • • + •10'101♦ , 1 _ '•10 .01, or 40 1 • 1 , • , . i c SOW Aft WOOO 00 I 1 • i 1 / I • l • , • 1 1 / , , / s / R ,1,I 0 I '� -- .. .J'.� • ' �r� • •• -�' • i • : O • I ••� •�,• • I (• • ' �i- - J. 0 300 6 � [ ,• • ♦ . I -' 10 • // •. ���� w ...". ± • ••• i t / •� • • /. I • f o `_�l "" BL OC 1 •f - ,i.- ��' • j ..,J , . -.� .0 • d�i� •. 1 : • �•, �•••.•_.�N 0100 10 - , -' • , 11 • !1010 ••. � I 0 ♦ � � � � � ; � • .�''- .''•mss ✓10,•10 l � . • �• e / /a / . .• I i • `�• • �•.•.•�, • •�, »• • ; I •� / •• • • N• �• , , • give • 1 . -•' = 1 • . CITY or t lb NAPLAW008 10 • / • • , • _ •�,___� �,�,_ 1 . ' 446 Tonsil" IMC..% I -' • ,I , V. 111CMA110� COY►ANl ••�••��• •M• • • • ' 1 dp 14 do • ` r I • , • s• 1tA000eIA/cs �� , / 1 •�. f � • . . • • • . 10 .- .•. _...,� • 1 t :- ! AVENU E. . • -- ---- -• .._._. • c PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONING DISTRICT BQUNDARIES (as revised 4/27/87) 5 Attachment 2 Q N Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miggler 2444 Highway 61 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. August 6, 1987 Honorable Mayor and Council Municipal Adminstrat ion Building 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Miggler Addition Plat Ladies and Gentlemen: On September 22, 1986 the City Council approved a preliminary plat of the 32 acre site which includes our residence. Rezoning was a continued issued which was finally resolved by a zoning Amendment adopted by Council on April 27, 1987. We are not prepared to complete the final plat by the one year time period ending September 22 1987. Section 30 -5(e) of the City Code authorizes extension of the Preliminary Plat approval. We understand that there has been no changes to the Comprehensive Plan or official controls and none are under consideration that relate to the site or the present approval. Please extend the period of the Preliminary Plat for a year which would expire on September 22, 1988. If you have any questions in this regard, please contact Mr. B. B. Chapman A1C P at 221 - 0401. Sincerely, i �9 Mr. Robert Miggler :dmn cc: B. B. C hapman A I C P Gale Rehnberg 6 Attachment 3 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST UNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDA MARCH 2, 1987, 7:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axdah 1 called the meeting to order at 7:30 m p. . II. ROLL CALL Commissioner Lester Axdahl Pr sent (Chairman Commissioner Richard Barrett A ent Commissioner Robert Cardinal P esent Commissioner Sue Fiola resent Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present Commissioner Jeffrey Hanson Present Commissioner Dennis Larson Present Commissioner George Rossbach Present Commissioner Ralph Sletten Present Commissioner Marvin Sigmundik Present Commissioner David Present III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 2, 1987 Commissioner Fischer moved pproval of he minutes of February y 1987 as submitted, Commissioner Larson seco ded Ayes —C • y Commissioners Barrett, Cardinal Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Rossbach Abstai -- Commissioners Axdahl, Fiola, letten, Sigmundik, Whitcomb IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Cardi 1 moved approval of the a ends as submitted. Commissioner Ross ach seconded Ayes - -all V. PUBLIC HEARINGS VI. VISITOR PRESEN ATIONS VII. COMMUNICATIO VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Rezoning: 2444 Maplewood Drive (Miggler) Ass-6c i ate Planner Johnson said the app 1 i cant i s requesting n q g to move the CO, commercial office /M -1; light manufacturing zoning district boundary o line n y e up with the east or west property line of Lot Two, Block One, and Lot-Two Block Two, in the proposed Mi gg 1 er Addition. Mr. B. B. Chapman, p l a n n i n g consultant . for the Robert and F'l ora Mi ggler, was present and explained their request. The applicant, Flora Mi gg 1 er, 2444 Maplewood Drive, spoke regarding the 1 P 12 years the rezoning has been pending and the considerable cost involved. She . stated her desire to have a decision made on this request. Gale Rehnberg, marketing consultant, spoke i n behal f of Robert an F Miggler. P d Lora Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the resolution on Page 17 to rezone the easterly portion of Lot Two, Block One, and Lot Two, Block Two, of the proposed Miggler addition from CO, commercial office, to M -1, light manufacturing, on the basis of: 1. The four standard findings for approval, 2. The area does not need to be zoned for CO use to protect the surrounding P property from incompatible uses. 3. The planning commission had previously recommended the entire Mi 99 ler site for M -1 zoning. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Commissioners A xdahl, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Sletten, Sigmundik, Whitcomb Nayes -- Rossbach B. Stree P 1 an : H i ghwood to Mai and Road Chuck Ahl, A ti P ng City Engineer for the City of Maplewood, resented the street plan co cept. A commissioner qu stioned wh it was the city's obligation to contruct Sterling Street ra . er than a developer constructing it. Mr. Ah 1 responded that because of the eavy mphasis on development in this area, it is felt that the city.will ha e t provide the water or eliminate development in this area. In .order t rovi de this water, the connection must be made between the pumping sta ion and the water tower. Various means of fundin the project were discu s with the commission. Ken Gervais spoke obehalf�of constructing Sterling Street through to provide for the new development in this area. Commissioner Ross�ach moved tocommend approval of the preliminary plat as presenteA for feasibilit report. Commissioner SXetten seconded Commissi/ Cardinal moved to amend emotion to put a cap on the amount of money a due date not to ex ed one year. Motion dor lack of a second Voting motion: Ayes - -Co issioners Axdahl, Fiola, Fischer, son, Larson, Rossbach, Sletten, Sigmundik, Whitcomb Nayes -- Commissioner Cardinal '� 7 Agenda Number,.. -� AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Increase in Ambulance Rates DATE:. June 18, 1987 Introduction Action by Cou Endorsed— Uodified Re j ect -. Date. . It is proposed .that ambulance rates be increased by 20% effective 1 -1 -88 to provide additional reven to finance the Paramedic Di of the Public Safety .Department. Background The last i ncrease i n ambulance rates was effective 1 -1 -87 Prior to that, there had not been an increase si 1 -1780. The reason that there was not . .:an i ncrease for seven .years was because the special tax l evy, authorized by voters on 6 -1 -76, comb.i ned with ambulance service charges, had been suffi- cient to cover the cost .of city ambulance services., During budget meetings with the Council l ast year, it was decided that the city should decrease i is special tax levy for ambulance service and increase service charges by 20/ 'i ns tead . This year, the Legislature has revised the tax l evy limit law. The new law 1 imi is the ci ty's taxi ng power to a greater extent than before. Al so, the Legislature did not increase l ocal government aid which i s one of Maplewood' s major revenue items .(i . e . 21/ of the General Fund revenues bu.dg-eted for 1987). These actions by the Legi slature provide an extra i ncentive for cities to in- crease service charges (like ambulance charges).. The cost of providing ambulance services i as follows 1986 1987 Actual Budg Cost , of P armedi c service $349 $403 less ambulance fees - 45,925 - 53 Services paid by taxes $303,454 $3493,690 A 20/ increase in ambu.l ance rates wi 1.1 provide $10,760 of additional revenue . The change in-rates would be as follows: Length of Time Current Proposed Services Rendered Rate Rate Over 50 minutes 31 - 50 minutes 11 - 30 minutes $144 $174 96 116 48 58 Charges for services are based upon the length vi ded between arrival at the scene and arrival Even after a 20% increase, Ma.pl ewood ambu ance the City of St..Paul, and will compare favorab list of current rates) . Recommendation .of time s ervi ces are pro. at the hospital or clinic. rates will be. less than at ly wi th others (see attached It is recommended that ambulance rates be increased by 20/ effecti ve I '.1 -88 to provide addi-ti onal revenue to finance the cost of paramedic services. Acti on Regui red Council adoption of the attached resolution. a t Current Rates for Amb Service City of St. Paul (298-41-18) Hennepin County (347 -5678) No. St. Paul ( #76) Cottage Grove ( #66) White Bear Lake (429 -3383 Kay) District Memorial Hospital (Forest Lake 464 -3341) Health Central Ambulance Active -Ride (Brooklyn Center, 421 -6550) Medibus Ambulance (Mpls. 870-8300) Midwest Olsen Med -Kab (827 -6221) Medplus (227 -9556) 6 0 ' -i 8 -& -? Basic - $191 Advanced - $318 Emergency - $240. - Base Rate - $110 Basic Life Support - $110 Advanced Life Support - $225 $4.00 per loaded mile (one way to hospital) Basic - $75 Outside of area (Forest Lake, Stillwater, h7p1 s . ) - $$ Advance Life Support - X125 ALS - $278 ALS bled Care - $355 ALS Trauma - $395 ALS Cardia Arrest - $420 Basic Life Support - $198 ALS Scene Treatment - $105 ALS Transfer (from one hospital. to another) - $220 ALS Basic - $450 per loaded mile Base - $78 &.$3.50 per mile (scheduled run) Base - $1.45 & 3.50 per mile (unscheduled run) Base - $65 & $2.00 per mile Paramedic Rig - $150 & $4.00 per mile Basic Life - $75 & 3.00 per mile Basic Life - $78 & $3.50 per mile A.S.A.P. - $145 & 3.50 per mile After 8:00 pm & weekends - $18 + $78 & $3.50 per mile RESOLUTION WHEREAS , the .City of _ Maplewood. i s authorized to impose reasonable charges for emergency and .paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978) ; and WHEREAS, it is fair and -reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon .the length. of time services are provided between arrival at the scene and arrival at the hospital or clinic. NOW., THERE FORE., BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective January 1, 1988: CHARGE LENGTH OF TIME SERVICES RENDERED $17.4 Over 50 minutes $1.16 31 - 50 minutes 58 11 - 30 minutes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge for services rendered when the length of services is 10 minutes or less, when the patient is not transported or when the patient is transported to the detoxification center. action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endo used Modified Rejected,_..., TO: City Manager Date FROM: Finance Director, City Clerk, Community Development Director RE: Increase in License /Permit Fees and Service Charges DATE: June 19,'1987 INTRODUCTION I t i s proposed that the attached license /permit fees and service charges be increased by 4.5/ for fees and charges due after. January 1,. 19880 RAU /rRlIIND It has been past practice to raise miscellaneous service charges annually to keep up with inflation. The proposed increase will generate approxi- mately $8,000 of additional revenues for the General Fund. Attached is a listing of present and proposed fees. It should be noted that revision of the pl.anni ng- related fees requires adoption of an. ordin- ance which is also attached All of the proposed fees represent an approx- imate 4.5% increase. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council increase license /perm.it fees and service charges by 4.5% effective January 1, 1988 to keep up with i nfl ati on, ACTION REQUIRED Council approval of the attached fee schedule to be effective for fees and charges due after January 1, 1988, and approval of. the first reading of the attached ordinance. PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance) Proposed 1986 1987 1988 Fee. Fee Fee ...Zone Change $146* $150* $157* Conditional Use Permit 146* 150* 157 Planned Unit Development 146* 150* 157 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 146 150 157 Variances: R -1 42* 43* 45* All Other Districts 83* 85* 89* Vacations 47* 48* 50* Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created) 31 32 33 Preliminary Plat 146 150 157 F nal Plat 31 32 33 Home Occupation Permit: Initial 42 .43 45 Renewal 16 17 18 Sign Erection Permit:. 1 - 10 Sq . Ft. 11 11 12 11 - 25 16 16 17 26 - 50 26 27 28 51 -100 62 64 67 Over 100 114 117 122 1986 1987 Proposed. Fee Fee Fee Bi llboard Erection Permit: First 5 Sq. Ft. 9 9 10 Each additional Sq. ft. 49� 50¢ 52¢ Billboard License 213 219 229 *Plus $12 for each affected property to pay for the County's new filing fee for resolutions. LICENSES DUE JANUARY 1st. 115 118 123 For Two Nights /Wk. for 52 Wks. 230 237 Proposed One Night 1986 1987 1988 Christmas Tree Sales: Fee Fee Fee Amusement Park License $115 $118 $123 Bench Permit: 85 88 92 First Bench 35 36 38 Each Additional Bench 2o. 21 22 Bingo License: For One (Night /Wk. for. 52 Wks. 115 118 123 For Two Nights /Wk. for 52 Wks. 230 237 248 One Night 15 15 l Christmas Tree Sales: Regular 110 113 118 No Organization 85 88 92 Cigarettes &Tobacco 30 31 32 Coin - Operated Amusement Devices: Per Location 115 118 123 Per Machine 30 31 32 Dog Kennels: First Time 30 31 32 Renewal 15 15 16 Gambling License 115 118 123 Gambling Investigation & Administration Fee 250* 250* Golf Course 115 119 124 *Fee set by State 1 aw Proposed 19:86 1987 1988 Fee Fee Fee Motels: 1 - 15 . Uni is 47 48 50 16 - 35 Un i:ts 73 75 78 36 -100 Units 114 117 122 Over 100 140 14.4 150 Restaurant and /or Bakery: Food Establishment 125 129 135 Catering Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 65 67 70 Each Additional 30 31 32 Fleet License 175. 180 188 I ti.nerant Food Establishment: (Limit 7 days) First .Day 30 31 32 Each Addi ti.onal Day 15 16 17 . ,Non- .Peri`shabl:e Food-Vehicle: First Veh i c 1. e 30 30 31 Each Additional .20 21 22 Fleet License 80 82 86 Potentially Hazardous Food Vehicle: First Vehicle 90 93 97 Each Additional 45 46 48 Fleet License 260 268 280 Special Food Handling Establishment 45 46 48 *License fee set by State law Proposed 1986 1987., .1988 Fee Fee Fee Tavern License $230 $237 $24 Taxicab License: Base Charge 30 31 32 Each Driver 10 11 12 Theater License: Indoor 115 118 123 Outdoor 230 237 248 Contractor's License 62 64 67 LICENSES DUE JULY 1ST 3.2 Beer License: On -Sale 100* 100* 100* Off-Sale 30* 30* 30* Temporary Food & Beer 15 /Day 16 /Day 17 /Day Used Car Dealer 230 237 248 LICENSES DUE AUGUST 1ST Motor Vehicle Repair 42 43 45 Service Station: First Pump 47 48 50 Each Additional Pump 7 7 8 Trailer Rental: First 5 Trailers 15 16 17 Each Additional Trailer 5 5 6 *License fee set by State law Proposed MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue 1986 1987 1988 ,Financing - Commercial Fee Fee Fee LICENSES . DUE NOVEMBER 1/ 1/. 1/ Club Liquor License $300* $300* .$300* On -Sale Liquor 4 4 4 Off -Sale Liquor 200* 200* 200* Sunday Liquor 200* 200 200* Beer and Dine: Seating up to 25 875 900 940 Each Additional 10 Seats 115 118 123 Maximum 2, 2 , 390 29500 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue ,Financing - Commercial Base Charge (/ of Bond Issue) 1/ 1/. 1/ Minimum 5 5 ,150 5 Maximum 20 20 9 600 2.1 Amount, Paid With Application 2 2 2 Tax - Exempt Mortgage Revenue Financing - Multiple Dwellings Application Fee 2 2,000 2 Liquor License Investigation Fee 350 360 375 Block Party License 16 16 17 Carnival License 114 117 122 Solicitor License: Base Per Company 62 64 67 Additional Per Sol i ci tor' 31 32 33 *License fee set by State law Proposed 1986 1987 1988 Fee Fee Fee Auctioneer License: Annual $ 57 $ 59 $ 62 Daily 16 16 17 Pawn Shop 57 59 62 Pending Assessment Searches 6 6 7 Police Accident Report Copies 5 5 5 Cat and Dog Licenses: Male 6- 6 7 Female 6 6 7 Neutered/Spayed 3 3 4 Tax Increment Financing Application Fee (escrow) 5 5 5 Building Relocation 114 117 122 Community Design Review Board 62 64 67 Sewer Connection Permit (Per Connection): Residential Connection 31 32 33 Non - Residential Connection 47 48 50 Moving Permit 62 64 67 Wrecking Permit 31 32 33 Driveway Permit 6 7 7 Property Owner List +3.60 /Name +3.70 /Name +3.90 /Name Mobile Home Permits 36 37 39 PUBLICATiONS (Includes sales tax) Zoning Code 6 6.25 6.50 Platting Code 3 3.25 3.40 Proposed 1986 1982 1988 Fee Fee Fee Sign Code $ 2.50 $ 2.75 $ 2.90 Comprehensive Plan 10 10.25 10.70 Zoning Map 3050 3.75 3.90 City Map 3.50 3.75 3.90 Section Map 3.50 3.75 3.90 Planning Commission: Minutes 0 0 7 1yr. Agenda Packet 0 0 82 /yr ORDINANCE N0., PLANNING FEES Section 1, Section 36 -26 of th.e Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is, hereby amended as follows: Section 36 -26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development Comprehensive Plan Amendment Variances: R -1 All other districts Vacations Lot Divisions Prel imi.nary Plat Final Plat Home Occupation Permit $157 157 157 157 45 89 50 33 for each lot created 157 33 45 for the initial permit and 18 for an annual renewal *This fee shall be increased by $12 for each affected property.., to pay for the County's recording fee. Section 2. Section 36 -258 of the sign code. i s amended as follows: Sec. 36 -258. Fees. (1) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be paid.. in accord'once with the following schedule: Square Feet Fee 1 - 10 $ 12 11 - 25 17 26 - 50 28 51 -100 67 over 100 122 (2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $10.00 for the first five square feet, plus 52¢ - for each additional square foot. (3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $229. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 19884P Passed by the Maplewood City Council on Attest: Mayor Ayes-- Nays-- Clerk .A.ctlon by Coun.cij : - Endors Modified MEMORANDUM Re j ac .t e Dat e TO: City Manager FROM Director of Community Development SUBJECT: MTC Bus Route Changes DATE: August 31 1987 The MTC is requesting approval to change several bus routes. They are also requesting that the city install several bus stop signs. Recommendation Approve the proposed route changes. mb M E 'T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S I T C O M M l 5 5 I O N 560 -6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 -4398 612/349 -7400 August 19, 1987 Mr. Geoffry Olson City Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MM 55109 Dear Mr . Olson: The Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) Service Planning & Scheduling staff will be making substantial improvements to most MTC bus lines serving the northeastern S t. Paul metropolitan area beginning October 3, 1987. The goals of the improvements are to, wherever possible, 1) increase efficiency, 2) simplify routes for more effective marketing of service, 3) increase service coverage in developed areas, and 4 P ) increase speeds, create more convenient transfers. The purpose of this letter is to obtain your permission for MTC buses to operate on the segments of those roads within your jurisdiction shown on Attachment I. MTC buses have an average axle weight of 9 tons. Bus stops should be posted with a red and white "T" bus stop sign. Posted stops make bus operation safer since motorists are aware at what points buses will be stopping. Posted bus routes are usually more successful routes. The red and white "T" signs are available from MTC free of charge* We request that your staff install the signs at the locations (at least those marked as high priority) listed on Attachment II. If additional sign posts are required for the bus stop signs, MTC will reimburse you for the capital cost. A minimum of two complete bids are required for MTC review first. Please respond to this request promptly. At least two months lead time is required when planning new bus routes. If you have any questions about this request, please call me at MTC Service Planning and Scheduling Section at the telephone number on the letterhead. Thank Y ou for your assistance. Sincerely John Dillery Transit Planner ' Service Planning and Scheduling Section JD /kal/6548 ft 8.260 at Attachment - I - New Bus Route Segments MTC Route 11 -B . ON: County Road D between North Entrance to Maplewood Mall and Hazelwood Avenue. ONO* Hazelwood Avenue between Co. Rd. D and Beam Ave. ON: Arcade Street between Co. Rd. B and Roselawn Ave. ON: Roselawn Avenue between Arcade St. and Edgerton St. The following segments of streets will no longer be used by MTC buses: ON: County Road B between Arcade St. and Edgerton St. OTT: Edgerton Street between Roselawn Ave. and Skillman Ave. ON: Hazelwood Street between Frost Avenue and Co. Rd. BO JD /nj h/3 922 w JD /nj h/3922 Attachment II - New Bus Stops Route 11 Southbound: _ .... ON: 'County Road D' AT: Best Buy Company In front Maple Ridge Apartments In f ront ON: Hazelwood Avenue AT: �ON: Ha zel _ Ridg e Apartment Across from ArCade Street Mw AT: Roselawn Ave Nearside Route 11 Northbound: ON: Arcade Street - AT : Rose lawn Ave, Far s i de ON: Hazelwoo Ave. AT: Hazel Ridge Apartments At Driveway ON: 'County Road D' AT: Maple Ridge Apartments Across from A T: Nor th Entrance to Maplewood Mall ..................... .__. Nearside Metal "T" bus stop signs are available from Mr. Glenn Peterson - MTC Senior Transit Supervisor for St. Paul area. Call him at 642 -2666. We will be happy to assist your staff with sign installation. w JD /nj h/3922 R o ti I le w o0 Pteec-bpvc = ^ • 3 ! 9 g A : k,, R-i d. e. Leo 4-5 h e c n k r of y PO ;,q I! T r C e . t Co. Z Rd.D Q Row�7es:9 - �tl -ZO -3 _ 4� ALE: 4l �.► l o SP / `t R �g 7n e vm r � N Rose��n � . Fe- A ve . - 3 r,� Pn xowa Are . 9- I!- 1141 V -, : 4v .„ Rf , f • V �„ • Ca Se A/r . .a+ m� •Ql r v . I va .l,a A/e . ' 1• tie S . S l� k" q �c�c1 � o s d � Action by Counoil , Rejeote Date TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Commission Resignations DATE: August 6, 1987 Dave Whitcomb and Jeff Hanson have resigned from the planning commission. They are moving to Woodbury, A letter from Jeff Hanson and resolutions of appreciation are attached. Advertisements to fill their positions have been placed in the St. Paul paper and the Maplewood Review. Unsuccessful applicants from the previous process have also been notified. Recommendation Approve the resolutions. jl Attachments 2 resolutions letter I ;OIN7 R6SOLl17IUN OF fPPRECIA7IUN G1KE/2EflS, Day-id Glh.itcom& h" ?.epn a mern2.¢a oZ .tfi¢. P2anre.inq Comnu.zeioz ol !'Iap.2gwood, l'linnehota .6.ince l'Jaach 20, 1980, and h" aewerl lai in #hrrt. capacity to .the pa"ent .t.ime; and G/KFi2£AS, the Planning Commis.6.ion hU.s appaec.iated- hi.6 Qxpea i.Qnce. .inzigh#h and good judgment; and G1XF-/2(SAS, he has lAzely given ol h.c;.s time and energy, without compen.3cct.i.on, boa the oZ the C_i.fy o/ l7ccpigwo od; and 41KFa2EA.S, he ham .6hoi..vt a.inceice. derUcatiore to hi,6 dint i.ee and hae corxs.i s .y eon.tA.i.A� /u:h .eeud.��/up, time and e//oaf /oa .the &ene,Git o/ thz city. NOV, 7KF.RUURE, 13£ 17 KEREBy RESOLVED boa and on 2eha" o/ the City oZ Nap2¢ wood, /7.inn.ezo.ta. and iii c i tizvr..s, that Dav-id Gllz.i;tcom.& .is heae4 extended ouic hexvrt.-AP.t gza.t.i,fude and appAe.ci.at.i.ort Zot him dedicated zevwice and we wi sh him con,t.uu.eed .6ucc." s in the Pws sed 8y the Counci.Q o� the U4 ol Ilap.Pewoad #Jue cry oZ , 1987* ;ohn C. slzeavu, rra /'as.6erL 8y tJze /'2ann.ing Commi..6,6.ion OZ .th.e City 0,1 l7aptwood ffws 17#h day 0,1 Ruqu-A, 1987. L".t eA AcduhQ, Chcc.& man r Luc4"e E. ,s, Cie,4k ;OIN7 i26SULL17IUN OF fPi iVCIR7I0N , G1K£/2FAS, ;e" flcu,3on hays teen a memle-4 o,L the Planning CommiA-3.ioR o� I'1ap2viood, l7.innea0.tri h.ince Nou¢m2.e.4 24, 1986, and hris eewed la-ithluiiy .in that capacity to the p4e svn t #..ime; and WhEIREAS, the At ann.ing Comm i,3.3ion hays appneciut ed hips ex�e�ee, .iutzi and good judgment; and WhEIRERS, he hays kzze4 given o� hips time and enzzgy, without comperLSa t ion, ZoA the 0,1 the City o/ Mapietwo od; and GJKVV-AS, he h" •sh.ol..vz a.ince/%e dedication to /u..6 dutize arid has con.6.i.s#.ztt.4 cont .ed hips .Qeade�uhip, .time and alo'Itt X02 the 8.en.el-ift, OZ the city. NOW, 7KEREtUi2£, LM 17 KDREAY RESOLVED Zorc and on 2.eha.2,-** o/ the City ol l'lapiewood, l7.inneao.t.a, and .items cif izen s, that ae" Kan son..i�s h,¢az4 extended ou4 lzeat.t1x-& gaa.ti ticde and appaecia.t i.oR X02 h i.�s dedicated �e�%u.ice and we w.i.3h him corn ti�uierL 3ucc_e sus in the lutuvm. /'"aed 9,y the Coune..i..P o,Z the City oZ flaptewood #h.i.h day oZ- , 1987. ;ohn* C. gacavup Ila l'azsecl gy .the /'&uvung Commi�,s.ion ol .th¢. City ol I1ap.2ewood #Jziz 17#h day . o Auya-A, 7987. Lzzt eA Acdah.t, Chailtman R.tfeh.t t Luck &P s, Cienk r� .• p 3 rgr • PRO GA�' SS July 28, 1987 a k WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.Q. BOX 8 • STIILWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 -0008 8121779 -5401 Mr. Geoff Olson Maplewood City Planner Ma plewood City Hall Maplewood, MN 55119 Dear Geoff:. As a "former" Maplewood Planning Commission member, I would l i k e to thank you for your help while I served on the Commission. Charles J. Swanson - County Administrator Virginia Dirksen Erdahl Deputy Administrator R Jerome Turnquist Deputy Administrator Jeff Hanson Intergovernmental Relations Sheila Neubauer Office Manager It was with deep regret that I submitted my resignation to the commission last week. I found my tenure on the commission to be interesting and very rewarding. My hope is that Maplewood will continue its strong planning efforts. You and the rest of the Community Development staff do an outstanding the citizen - i job i n serving g s of Maplewood, and are to be commended. I am sure our paths will cross again ... If there is ever anything I can do for you, please don't hesitate to ask. Sincerely, eff Hanson Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator Washington County JH:pr Washington County does not discriminate on the basis of racgk color, national origin, sex, religion, age and handicapped status In employment or the provision of service& � Page 7 Planning Commission minutes 8 -17 -87 H. Planning Commission Resignations Commissioner Rossbach . moved ' approval of the resolutions of appreciation for Dave Whitcomb and Jeff Hanson, who have resigned from the planning commission. Commissioner Cardinal second A es -- Barrett Cardinal na 1 ' Y Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach I. Cha a of September 7 Meeting Date Commissio er tem r Rossbach move to recommend the Se ' September 7 Planni Commission meeting which tills on Labor Day be rescheduled to August 31, nless staff ancels. Commissioner Fiola sec nded Ayes -- Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola Fischer, Larson, Rossbach I.X. UNFINISHED BUS NESS . X. COMMISSION PRES ATIONS A. Counc i 1 Me i g: August 10, 1987 XI. STAFF PRESEN TION A. Counci Meeting — August 24, 1987: Dennis Larson X II. ADJOURNM NT Meeti adjourned at 10:1 p. e low AGENDA # � """ f� MEMO RAN D-UM TO: Ma and Counc'ilmembers FROM: Cit Mana RE: Reschedulin October 12th Council Meetin DATE,, September 9, 1987 October 12th is a holida therefore it'is recommende that the Council meetin be rescheduled to October' 15, 1987 (Thursda at 7:00 p.m. Action b C 6uncjj: ., Endorsee........ Modified,...,... Re eote Date MAM: 1 nb Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorse Modified TO : City Manager 4ichael McGuire Rej ected.,,. FROM: City Clerk D DATE: August 10, 1987 RE: Election System It is requested that $8,000.00 be transferred from the Con - tingency Fund to the Election Supply account. This amount is needed to purchase the supplies that are required to use the Optech IIIP Voting system. $120,000 was placed in Capitol Outlay to urchase the system, p y $96,483.00 has been expended for the following: 17 Optech IIIP Tabulators @ $4 70 112 Voting Booths @ 163 18 9 256.00 .17 Data Cartridges @ 225 3 42 Transfer Cases @ 65 2 17 Protective Cases @ 40 680.00 $96,483.00 The following support equipment and supplies are still needed: Demonstration Box Plastic $140.00 ea x 3 = 420.00 Battery - Auxiliary Power 85.75 ea x 7 = 600.25 Cable - Auxiliary 48.00 ea x 7 = 336.00 Rechargers 29.00 ea x 2 = 58,00 Handicapped extenders 25.00 ea x 14 = 350.00 Anti Static Mats 115.00 ea x 14 = 1610.00 Chips - E Prom 8.00 ea x 34 = 272.00 Anti Static Bag 6.75 ea x 17 = 114.75 Ribbons - Printer 3.00 ea x 17 = 51.00 Printer Tape 33.50 (24) 33.50 Light Bulbs - Voting Booths 3.00 ea x 112= 336.00 Light Bulbs - Optech IIIP 3.00 ea x 17 = 51.00 $4232.50 Legs for 112 Booths $25 per set = 2800..00 $7032.50 Seals - Padlock A Number - E - /..i AGENDA REPORT Action by Cou_ncil: TO: Cit mana Endorsed FROM: Assistant Cit En Modified___,_.... SUBJECT: Crestview Drive-Hudson Place Water Main j f . Re ected Cit Project 85-07 i l --.. Chan Order Three and Final Pa Dot DATE: September 4, 1987 INTRODUCTION Attached is a chan order recommended b the cit en consultant adjustin the final project q uantities to those actuall constructed. Council approval of the chan order is re as well as approval of final pa to the contractor, BACKGROUND Construction of the water main alon Crestview Drive and Hudson Place and the associated restoration has been satisfactoril completed b co W. Houle, I►c., the cit contractor. The contractor has supplied lien waivers, affidavits for settlement and final inspection reports to document final pa ALTERNATIVES le Approve the chan order and final pa 2. Reject the chan order and final pa Instruct staff to have contractor correct council identified deficiencies. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council approve the chan order and final pa b passin the attached resolution,, BUDGET IMPACT The cost incurred on the construction contract for this project is $202,644.59 which is $3,203.44 above the ori estimate. Indirect costs for le fiscal and en costs are below that estimated for assessment so the net result is the total project cost is sli below that assessed. Additional indirect costs should balance the cost incurred with the amount assessed,, jc TOLTZ , KING, DUVAL L, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Eng i n eers -Arch i tects -P I a n ners 1105 Change Order No., St. Paul, Minn. —May 19--E, Comm. No. 7922 To _ C.W. Hole. Inc tov.140070100f == • • o ►�••� V [!= • • You are hereby to make the f o l l o w i n g change to y our contract dated ._. J_ u-I y_. 4 , 19 .$,�. The change and the work affected thereby is sub to a l l contract stipulations and covenants. Th Is Change Order w i l l (increase) the contract sum b Three H .0 r e d ___- __ -___ Dollars ($ _319.25 _ ) This change order shows the actual quantities Instal I ed at the unit price bid amounts (see attached Itemization): Net Change Amount of Original Contract Additions approved to date Deductions approved to date Contract amount to date Amount of this Change Order Revised Contract Amount (No so 1 ) $ + (Nos (Add) $� $_2 Ap proved C I_TY OF MAPL EWOOD .- MN Owner By Approved Date Contractor Date +$319.25 TOLTZ , KING, DUVAL L, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED B � Y .LagWy D. Bohrer, P.E. White - Owner* Pink - Contractor* Blue -- TKDA* Yellow - Field Goldenrod - Department Green - TKDA Main File RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 85 -07, Crestview Drive - Hudson Place Water Main and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 85 -07 Change Order Three, and WHEREAS., said project has been certified as completed, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Three, and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the project is completed and accepted and final payment on the construction contract is hereby authorized. A Number !e / V AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: Assistant Cit En SUBJECT: Arkwri Street Improvements Cit Project 86-12 Chan Order Two DATE: September 8, 1987 INTRODUCTION 4c+1.:1Lon b Council 10 , Endorsed-__ Modif ied..--- Rejected-_ Date Attached is Chan Order Two for Arkwri Street Improvements, Cit Project 86-12, for consideration b the cit council. Approval is re b the council prior to pa to the contractor,, BACKGROUND Construction of a six-inch water main was authorized b council between Count Road B and Eldrid Avenue as part of the Arkwri Street Improvements, Durin construction of the main, an existin cross and corporation needed to be repaired to make the new main operational. The contractor, Lake Area Utilit Contractin Inc., was ordered to repair the dama items on a time and materials basis pendin a review to determine whether the dama was pre-existin or caused b construction operations. Tests of the dama indicate that the dama was due to pre-existin conditions and the contractor's operations were not the cause* ALTERNATIVES 1* Approve the chan order, 2* Reject the chan order, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council approve this chan order b passin the attached resolution. The work has been accomplished and tests indicate that the repairs would have been necessar without the construction on Arkwri Street, BUDGET IMPACT The costs incurred b this chan order can be handled b the construction contract since the actual construction units are less than ori estimated, jc CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA September 8, 1987 Project 86 -12 Change Order Two TO: Lake Area Utility Company, Inc. FOR: Arkwright Street Improvements FOR: City of Maplewood You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated May 13, 19870 The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. This change order will increase the contract sum by Two Thousand Four Hundred Sixty and 29/1.00 Dollars ($2,460,29). Add r 1. Work itemized on attached Invoice 2579 $1 20 Work Itemized on attached Invoice 2580 1,340.14 Total $2 Amount of original contract $94 , 206.60 Additions approved to date 500.00 Deductions approved to date 0000 Contract amount to date 94,706.60 Amount of this change order (add) 2 , 46 O.29 Revised contract amount 97,166.89 Approved Mayor Date Approved Contractor Date Date Approved Engineer Date Date I - J tr,7i�4nf 9x4�,+,4�1 �`p.? (�4+r•� I[;�.. • r ✓ x . 4 ie Q r i j 1 ;j. 1� - •q�..� nv °•nom v.N1vyH �t , t m z. - - ' LA KE AREA 25 NTRACTIN INC � 95 2 Ave hue 20th I1Ue + f t r 1.. SOUK JOB PH E ONE . DATE OF ORD R ,E ; Ir •� �.••� HUGO MINNESOTA 5 .; 5038 June 1 5 t ,• i . .. E f , It d. • r Vii, i (f • �N R JOB NAME /LOCA N Ma pl ewoo r'1. , .. " .. ' . (612) 426 -4103 Minneso to r:':•1 he flange on existi / • ,'� • crass had to-replac cross Y . , i ;• TO ................�ltv Of Mallewood , x . �. r • Mr Bill Priebe .../../ ......................./......../..... N..... ...,....N....,,......,..... / .,. - ............ , _ , , l N. »,.,. .,.. "C L. un t ..................... Y....... load.... B . p H O N E,, ,...,,,.,/,,,.,.,/,,,,,,,,,, „,,,,r,,,,,,,,,, /,,,, • . �- �•. , � . 1• ....................... .. /.........,,,:.,..,..... /.... WpleWood Mi nnesota ...................»/................. , 55109 /,........................ /.. /. ,,... � ......... - ..... /,, .. ,,,,. /.,, /,,,, ,. - ,..,. . .................. /, /, /, ORDER TAKEN By s �' • . ............... ............ /,................. ,...,,.....,,,... „,.,,,.,,,.,/„». r,/,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,.,,.,,.,.,,, TERMS-. „,r,,,,.,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, Ott Q ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,/./,,,,,,,/,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/, ..... /..,,,...,.,...N /N.... / r •l /,,. -III YM Y ro 4 { > 1 A \ � \ > t e„ fi , .`kA y<f , ti CRIP'TIO °� , ; i.' •? � � e 11 ' > .......... ............ 7 BaCkhoe f .n 3y AUI�;s AM .F$p' ,•i b .. 7 hr ............... / /.,.... /.. /, ../../.................. ...... /. /........,...... /. /..,. @30, 00 /.N ...................... • Fl ckup Truck ,.,. ..,.N......N............... ...., , ........ ' 2 hr s . Tam ...... r ............................... ., N..NN,N,.N per ..N...................,.... ..,,.........,.,... /,...... 63 00 •. t .......................... N.. .......,........... /// , .,...,Ni.....I.NN • .N.N..N..r...N... ». ,,,.,.,.,, . NN./,• ............. NNNNNNNN.. i/..... .N.........rnN..vrN.r..N...NNii hr Water N.. N .. ............N /..,- ...NN.rN.N... 5 nl . . ..... /....,....... ................ /..... - r ... Pwnp (3 ►�) ..N.N.NN.MV...,.N., ....../ ...... N. .. 00 , sf T tt • , , /,.,,,,,,,... ........................................................................................ .......................... /,,,� „ /.r.10 0 .......... N .. ............................... or ./ ................................... ............................... ........,.,............. x r / ........................... .................. ,...........� III. /. /. /.II/ ...I...,» �•' � 7 r .................../ r...... N.......... NN.................. ............... ..........,.................... ....,..... /NN /r, N/N/ /III.I /I./rWIN.,NI.N .III /IIINi.,III /N / /., / /N.,» /., ...... . - .....NII.N.NN /........N........ - . ../......../....../,.........,. • ........................ 1 N.. ..... N,. t f ♦.. • .....' ....,... ....,.,... /.,.,.,.,.,.......... ....N+ .................. .................... .. .... ,,............ //. ..rN......../ ..i.. N,.r.. ............ •� • 1r • � 1 ............. .. ... ....,.....,i. ., . . N N .. r..........................r. ... .i.. .............. •'yh L . • , x F ..,..... ......,..,.., ...........................r... ,.......................... ,,,......,....,......,;. „,...,........,... ..,..,............,,,,.. r.,.,,......,. ..... ., N....... / .............. i '_i• it •- .. , + •L ..../... ...,.....N../ .................. ....................... .........r.......N,....../...., ............................................... ............................... ., .».N ..................I,.,,.INN ..... . I.. ......... , ...,..,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ............... ....................N..... ... ....... +...N.....n • t� - ' • ' M ` . f i N.N. f ....,..NNN....N.NN..N.NNN .. N .r............r„ ... , �. �� .. ...................,.. /.....,.. N...NN /......... C r„ u �'. � 4 w •'�✓./. 1y # .�_ ... . �f l t ..... ................,,............N N /,...N.NN„ ............................./..........,.................., Ni..... f ... ....... /.....N. /,.. /../ ..,..,..N.......... 1 4. N..., /..,............,......,....... -- ------ ..../..i....N .. N. ... ...I /....NINi.II.,.. .III,,.II.II. • ....III.... ............ .....N..., ................... ..... . r ......... N.. I. Nr... N.. N.. ..... ii. N.... I... N . ....... ........ ..... .......N/...INI.I .iN. ♦ / >. �..yyT +� i 7 f . r• �� f _ LABOR .iir >m..>.NN. . ............ /../..... iN.N � /.....i..i../...i........ . r.. / /,Nr. .N ........ .........i., '.r: �,K � t } ' R H OURS RATE AM OUNT : ..: {, z Laborers TOTAL MATERIAL 1�4 27. oa 378.. Foreman o TAL e LABOR $822 1 1��. • • . � ;. ... . 1 .. 1• .M r 1 �' . i > k: 31, 22 3 30 aperatar -- Equipment 00 d- fy i 3� x .;• , , t y 7 31.55 • 220 $ WORK ORDERED BY 5 ” ,1 , ° > �. • �� DATE COMPLETED TOTAL —8 n : 3 F LABOR 2�nt I Thank Gam TAX f PAY l0u THIS S AMOUNT �► `-""" y $19 120 15 SIGNATURE I h ere acknowledge ' ,�, �� ' /• .. r ; „ .t, com the satisfactory pletion o the a ove described work.) y 7 . 2580 LAKE AREA • UTILITY CONTRACTING INC. � 6995 20th Avenue South JOB PHONE I .DATE , OF ORDER HUGO, MINNESOTA 55 038 J= e 16.., 198.7 0 1.7 JoB NAME /LOCATION Maplewood( Co. Rd.B & Arkwri t (612) 426 -4103 Fixod corp I T °.. clt of ra plod . ................ .... ............................... Bill _Priebe .........................................././....................../........ ... /.............. /............ ... PHONE ........................ ............ /..............,. // ......., . /..:...:.,Q.2.:.Ea at:....County,,..... Road..... B ......... .......... /.. /. /.... /....... Maplewood Minn esota 55109 /// ................................... //..,./.../,..../..... ...... .: ........ /......... / / /...... ORDER TAKEN BY ..,. b ./..... N..... N/ ......................... ............................................................ ........................................................::................... w........... N ............. ......:...............:.....:............ ....... /........... ......... ... Scott 0 /..... :..../ ...... ./.... /......• t . TERMS: / .. .. .. ... /. .... ..,.... ... $.. , .. \ ` vim, \ � (,,•. ..... ..:.. ... ..... .... .:.. ....... ... ............. ,>+ . •• .l` `•Z:> ••Rik . > \ M". ' � � UNT ' ....::�.. .,a•a. i / •. `,i`Y: ^,'• � � > ,4:'v:�:�: , 7 hrs . Backhoe (179 .. ....... ............................................../......../...................................................../................................../...................... @30 .00 $210 00 R, .. /1 N......................................./......./../................................. N. . /................. /........... .. / ................9 hrs . • Pickup Truck ..............r................................................................../..................................................../ @ 9 - ............................... 00 .................................. ......./ .................//.../....... N.................... � 81 00 r a . Water..... Pump..... ....:....�....... @10.00 . ....... .. hr ....... (3" ..... N ................................ r.......... r..../...... i..... i./. i..... i............................ ...........NN......../ ------ NN. . N.... ..N. ......... ....... ................ 10 ....................... /....... /......, 00 Tra.�.ler .. ... /.. /.........N1....hr . ......... (Lowbo . ........................................................................................... ................ ............... ............................................................................................................................................................................. .. ................ .................................r.................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................../................................................ .... / /.//........./......../... ...... ....................... ./.. N..... N ...................... ............../..//.//. I .I. /I / /. / /I.II /I..I /. / /II. /. //. .. . ./ ................ .. ................................................/.. ......................./....... 25 .............. ....I /.I.... /.I /.... /........ /.... ...........,,.... //. 001 ....,.... /.,,. /. .....r.... /......I /. , • . , ............................................................................................ . ............ . ........................................................... N /. II /I.I.... ./ III// I/ IIIIN/. IrI.... N. r/ N./..•/...../.. / ..................I......I..N. III.......I.... NN. I../ I........./ I../.... I. I.. I../..... N./// II//....../..// .....I. //.... /. /.. NNN..../........ r....../......././.....// N . /.... /N..........NNN.N........ NNN....//. N.. N/. I....... rl.....///////.// /.........N.....• /...... /...... .............. ............... ................... . N..... .....N................/........ .............. ..../... N . . ... . I.. I II / IIIr./. I/.. I/. II.../ I.. I.. .....I.......I.........II// /... .I........ / ... N... I..... i.. I.... I. II. I./.. IN. I. N. W.. I/. I.., NI NN.. NN..... II. N. NNI. . .... . .. . ... . ......... . ....... II../ I... II. I// IIIIN/ . / / /. / /I..I /II / /IIIII /I / /IIII // III.../// I... ... / /.. / /I.I. /. /II /I / /..I / / /.II /III. /I /II /I /N... .I / / /N / /. / /. / /I /I /. /. / /N.N. NNN/ Ni... 1 / /II.I/ / /NII.. / /...... /..NN. // NNN.. I. /.NNN. / / /......... /N...... /./ / . NN /N....NINNN.IN /iN/iI...I...I.. INN. .......... /................/... I.I. /II...N.NiN.NN.N../I /I/.. /I. NN+ NNVi. NNiNN ........ ........ .................. .. /...I / /// . /. / /. /. / / / /. /// ....III.I.N.... /.NN.N... /... /N... ........... / /I / / / /.. ......I....... /iI. /i • � • �M •. • a � j"�Y�.' •'•Er M. �,..,, a,:_ ....... .. - 1 • � ' ' • ' ,.. /NI.W.yNN.i/NNN /INHHN/NN.. III.. I....... I.I /II//....../..I / /I.iIIIII..III../. I/...N . . AMOUNT TOTAL MATERIAL I.I.✓..I/.I..I.II.I.I./.... /... I.I.II /..../I....I //. 9'T ' , I , • , LABOR HOURS RATE $156 t q Foreman 6 31 .90 191 0 = TOTAL LABOR $ 657 1 7 t Superintendent 3 32.90 98 G - Equipment $32 6 00� , Operator 6 1 31 .55 205 7 WOR O RED BY �11� DAT �Q �Q P - -1G—� � • T OT A L 65 7 TAX y . r . i LABOR `?'hank `You ` PAY THIS AMOUNT -)0- -)0- ]. • I IJ F ', _ SIGNATURE (I he by acknowledge the satisfactory r • completion of th bove described work.) (j ' 1 • , ` n mo - , s r 1 �. t` ,.,� - ^: • .- ,. r _ f d 'i'• T��' . ��•. + y r.. t . y 7 + 1 r.. ,f: r � i• rim•: � . '!, ..t F '• �f ' ?.1, I I �`;/ '� . , ! "9� . +'. .5:. ..�� 1 - i k i `Fl '1 < `. r .. a} »i i I2. .+ f, .. .v w •: 1 • i�' f 4 ' s' ' t � �'• 1 •{F� a, � � ^ ' ' ' '.i � t,, .� 3 � 1, A a +a'. { , {,� � t5� ' , ice__ ��_ L / �• t �� ' r ' ' • l I ' A) f. ({y ♦ ��' �� ff J�� •, � ti p- • � • I � i' ;� 1. ', � .? j 1 {'... - r i• i,1 i 1 • - .� / 1 1 . i j � 1 . v \ � l 1. . ' 1 I ', ' . ' , zi RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86 -12, Arkwright Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 -12 Change Order Two, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEW00D , MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Two. F -/ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: .PROJECT: DATE: Introduction City Manager Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit for a Home -Occupation 2675 Stillwater Road Daniel Ader .Action by. Counci1a Patio Furniture Sales and Construction August 5, 1987 En,dorsed�... SUMMARY Modifie Re . Date The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a home occupation to construct and sell patio furniture. The furnitur would be built in Mr. Ader's basement workshop. One to three items would be displayed for sale in the front yard and some stored in the back yard. This home occupation would be seasonal, running from mid - April through August. Discussion -- Outside Display of Furniture Section 36 -66 ( 4 ) (b) ( 3 ) of city code states that there shall be no change in the outside appearance of the premises that would indicate the conduct of a home occupation. The applicant would like to display P Y his lawn furniture in the front yard. This would not be consistent with normal residential usage and should be prohibited as violating city code. One set of furniture should be allowed in the rear yard on the basis that this would be consistent with normal usage. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 10 approving a conditional use permit for one year for a patio furniture construction sales hom occupation at 2675 Stillwater Road. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to: 1. Compliance with the requirements in Section 36 -66 (4) (b) pertaining to the operation of a home occupation. 2. A fire extinguisher with a minimum classification of 2A 1OBC shall be provided in the workshop. Dust shall not be allowed to accumulate so as to be an explosion hazard. 3. The house shall have its address clearly posted on the house as required by code. 4. The only signage allowed shall be a two - square -foot wall sign mounted on the house. 5. Only one set of patio furniture shall be displayed in the rear yard. No furniture shall be displayed in the front or side yards, 6. There shall be no parking on Stillwater Road, 79 Installation of a looped driveway or driveway turn - around. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the . surrounding property owners within 350 feet of this site. Of the eleven replies, one neighbor had no comment, five were in favor, and five objected. The objections are as follows: 1. This would cause an unsafe driving condition with cars parked along the road. There is only two feet of shoulder. Staff comment: The applicant will be installing a second driveway connection to Stillwater Road to create a looped driveway in the front of the house. Cars can then pull off of the street and re -enter without backing out onto the road. 2. The previous owners had frequent garage sales and their customers often turned around in adjacent neighbor's driveways. Staff comment: The looped driveway should eliminate this concern. Also, garage sales tend to attract a higher volume of customers in a shorter amount of time, making it more likely to create this p roblem, 30 "There is no room on the front lawn to display any sale items." "There is enough commercial clutter in the neighborhood." Staff comment: The display of furniture would be limited to one set in the rear yard. 2 REFERENCE Site Description 1. Lot area: 30 square feet 2. Existing land use: Single dwelling and accessory building g Surrounding Land Use Single dwellings Ordinance Requirements 1. See Section 36 -66 (4) on a e p g 9. 2. Section 36 -442 (b) requires that council make ten ' findings for the approval of a conditional use permit. See the resolution on page 10. j 1 Attachments 1. Land. Use Plan 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Site Plan 4. Applicant's letter .50 Home Occupation Questionnaire 6. Home Occupation Ordinance 7. Resolution 3 Bearer lake LAND USE PLAN 4 Attachment 1 , L a r p e n t eu r ia —LL _. �., ,._. . t' It I , RM W 4 , y ! .•... M RM S R LSC M . - -- - major col lector Mary Ave . • .. . ._. �1, IRI m Stillwater Road 3 SC i - s o s - ._ } ., — m or collector if 11848191 Harvester IL Ell III i l A C Rfi, P _ ..P E ago RI 1 E SC SC ..1 u— _aa ma or arteria i Minnehaha J 4 c, h ma or collector o Conway -.� Bearer lake LAND USE PLAN 4 Attachment 1 L s 1� Z iW C� !%I 051) its m E a F . fll� a � Y � S 3Am • ' • . - \Z4) .... ) t 15 �� �• 4� *TAG r i a (30) of l � C3+ .� ` • .'. ` , r Off) r 4 - 0e 3 43) j k 4000 • Nww• / ;w•• •N fN � S ` .•- C73 • #• - _ _ 2s (S97 M EMO da PROPERTY LINE / MAP 5 Attachment 2 4 N SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 0 existing driveway fl . i 33 �4yt ••�h • • N proposed driveway loop N ~ `w• ::: "' Ilk " "• Je 1 i •• � • V w � • l l e. Y Air, SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 2675 Stillwater Road Maplewood, Minn. 55119 To: City Of Maplewood My name is Daniel Ader. Recently I have purchased property in the city of Maplewood located at 2675 Stillwater Road. My intentions in relation to applying for a Home Occupation Permit are as follows. I plan to build and sell picnic tables and patio furniture. All of these things will be done in my basement workshop. I consider this a seasonal occupation which ussually runs I eA from mid-April to the end of August. I have Sing this type of occupation for the past two summers in another city. I feel I have a good product that people will be very satisf ied with. Si , erely, t .•''I r Daniel J. Ade 7 Attachment 4 r U)d e. applicant's name address o home occupation HOME OCCUPATION QUESTIONNAIRE 1. How many persons, other than members of the family residing on the premises, would be engaged in the home occupation? 1 (Only one other person is allowed) 2. What percentage of each level of your homes' s floor area would be used in conducting the home occupation? (20,% is the maximum allowed) 3. Describe any changes in the outside appearance of the building or premises, other than one wall mounted sign of not more than two square feet? (No other changes allowed) 4. Describe any retail sales of products produced off-site, NO f (Such sales must be subordinate to the principle activities of the home_ occupation) 5. How many customer cars would be parked on the premises at any one time? (Max i.mum o three al lowed ) 6. Describe any vehicles to Ae used in_ the home occupation. 7. Describe any equipment or process used which would create noise, vibra tion, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off your property. No J1 6- (None allowed) 8. Describe any fire, safety or health hazards ( None allowed) 9. Does this home occupation include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shop, machine shop (places where raw metal is fabricated using machines that operate on more than 120 volts of urrent) , weld - ing ammunition manufacturing or similar uses? (None of the above are allowed) Note: The city council may waive any of the above requirements if the home occupation is located at least 350 feet from an adjoining residential use. F , r 8 Attachment 5 Sec. 36 -66 Home. Occupations (4) a. Home occupations shall require a special exception permit for any of the following activities which would occur more than thirty (30) days each year: - 1. Employment of any person not residing on the premises. 2. Customers visiting the premises. 3. 'Manufacture of projects on the premises. 4. A vehicle(s) used in the home occupation, and parked on the premises, which exceeds a one -ton payload capacity. Home occupations which do not involve any of these activities may be permitted without a permit. b. Home occupations requiring a permit shall be subject to, but not limited to, the following requirements: .1. Not more than one person, other than members of the family residing on the premises, shall be al- lowed to engage in such occupation. 2. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20) percent of each level of the dwelling unit floor area shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation. 3. There shall be no change in the outside appear- ance of the building or premises, that would indi- cate the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign meeting the requirements of the city sign code. 4. Limited retail sales of products produced off -site :may be permitted, but only when subordinate to the principal activity(ies) of the home occupation. 5. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupa- tion in greater volumes than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. The need for off - street parking shall not exceed more than three off - street parking spaces for home occupa- tion at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the resident occupants. 6. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference de- tectable to the normal senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment or process shall be used which creates visual or au- dible interference in any radio or television re- ceivers off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off the premises. 1 7. No fire, safety n or health hazard shall exist. 8. A home occupation shall not include the repair of internal combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding, ammunition manufacturing or other objectionable uses as determined by the city. Ma- chine shops are defined as places where raw metal is fabricated, using machines that operate on more than one hundred twenty (120) volts of current. 9. Any violation of these requirements shall result in the denial or revocation of the home occupation. 10. The city may waive any of these requirements if �r the home occupation is located at least three hun- dred fifty (350) feet from an adjoining residential use. 11. Approval shall be for a period not to exceed one year. Renewal shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 17, article II, of the City Code. 9 . Attachment 6 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day f 1987 at 7 p.m. y The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Daniel J. Ader initiated a conditional use permit to operate a patio furniture construction and sales home occupation at the following- described property: Lot 21, Block 5 Midvale Acres No. 2 This property is also known.as 2675 Stillwater Road, Maplewood, p , WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Ma p , 1987. The l g lewood Planning Commission on planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 20 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1987. Notice thereof was published and mailed ursuant to p law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive lan f this chapter. and with the purpose and standards o p . 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated of that zoning district to be compatible with the character p . 40 The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbin g to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, lare smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, - g p , water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 10 Attachment 7 60. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the ' e rea properties. 70 The use would be serviced by essential ublic services, es, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and P arks.. 80 The use would not create excessive additional requirements q irements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the requirements in Section 36 -66 (4) (b) pertaining to the operation of a home occupation. 2. A fire extinguisher with a minimum classification cation of 2A lOBC shall be provided in the workshop. Dust shall not be allowed to accumulate so as to bean explosion. hazard. 30 The house shall have its address clearly posted on the house as required by code. 4. The only signage allowed shall be a two - square -foot wall sign mounted on the house. 5. Only one set of patio furniture shall be displayed in the rear yard. No furniture shall • 1 be displayed in the front or side yards. 6. There shall be no parking on Stillwater Road. 11 .Adopted this day of , 1987. Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS* ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed i nted cl l ewo od Min PP e r k o f the City o f Maplewood, , nesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1987, with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the • corporate seal of the city this day of , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 12 Page 2 Planning Commission minutes 8 -3 -87 VIII, NEW BUSINESS A, Conditional Use Permit: 2675 Stillwater Road A r ( de ) Secretary Olson explained the staff report. Daniel Ader, h P the applicant of the project, was present and.answere_ d questions from several Commi s s i oners, Commissioner Rossbach moved adoption of the resolution approving a conditional use permit for one year for a patio furniture construction /sales home occupation at 2675 Stillwater Road. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to: 1. Compliance with the requirements in Section 36- 66'(4) (b) pertaining to the operation of a home occupation. 2. Afire extinguisher with a minimum classification of 2A lO6C shall be provided in the workshop. Dust shalt not be allowed to accumulate so as to be an explosion hazard. 3. The house shall have its address clearly posted on the house as required by code, 4. The only s i gnage allowed shall be a two- square -foot wall s i 9 n mounted on the house, 5. Only one set of patio furniture shall be displayed in the rear yard. No furniture shall be displayed in the front or side yards. 6. There shall be no parking on Stillwater Road, 7, Installation of a looped driveway or driveway turn - around, Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal Fi of a, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach, Si gmundi k Nay-- Sletten Be Conditional Ne, Permit:,/ 798 N. McKnight Road (Mosner) Secretary 0T son exp 1 i ne the staff report Jam applicants P es and Kathy Mosner, a PP of the prod , were present and stated their objections to the driveway turn -a nd requirement, J ons Commissioner Cardin a move adoption • pt on of the resolution to approve a conditional use rmit for a beauty salon home occupation ht R d, A P n at 798 N. McKnight pp rov 1 is based on the findings required by ordinances, su 'ect to: The John Glenn Jr. High School site was rezoned from M - to R -1 . light manufacturing, , single dwelling residential, on September 12, 1983. The school was a permitted use in the M -1 district. Since the change to R -1, a condition ' al use permit must be obtained to expand the building. Discussion (storm- water runoff) Storm -water runoff control is the main issue with this ro flop p posal, due to the recurring flooding ng behind the Hazelwood Avenue homes in Footprint Pond. On July 13, 1987, council directed ' the city engineer to prepare a feasibility stud four a storm- sewer ' Y project in this area. This project is tentatively scheduled for council review by the winter of 1987. No construction should take place until contracts are signed to build the new storm -sewer system • g • y or on -site ponding is provided. This is to ensure that the added impervious surface created b negatively effe Y this project will not ne g y ect the properties along Footprint Pond, Recommendation Adoption of the ,resolution on page 11 approving the building addition to John Glenn Jr. High.School, based on the findings g required by ordinance and subject to the followin g conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated July 16, 1987, unless a change is approved by the city community design review board. 2. No grading, paving or building permits shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for the development of a new storm sewer system, or p y , until on -site pondi.ng is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels, ..s MEMORANDUM Aotion by Counoll l TO: City Manager FRO M: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Endorsed SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit . Modified LOCATION: 15 E . County Road B Ro j ode APPLICANT: N.E. Metropolitan Intermediate School Date District No. 916 OWNER: Independent School District No. 622 PROJECT: John Glenn Jr..High School Addition DATE: August 11, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional nal use permit .to add onto John Glenn Jr. High School. The ro osed 8,664 p p square - foot on e-story add' •� , y ition would be used for holding classes in special education for severely handicapped children. Refer to the applicant's.letter on page 8. Background The John Glenn Jr. High School site was rezoned from M - to R -1 . light manufacturing, , single dwelling residential, on September 12, 1983. The school was a permitted use in the M -1 district. Since the change to R -1, a condition ' al use permit must be obtained to expand the building. Discussion (storm- water runoff) Storm -water runoff control is the main issue with this ro flop p posal, due to the recurring flooding ng behind the Hazelwood Avenue homes in Footprint Pond. On July 13, 1987, council directed ' the city engineer to prepare a feasibility stud four a storm- sewer ' Y project in this area. This project is tentatively scheduled for council review by the winter of 1987. No construction should take place until contracts are signed to build the new storm -sewer system • g • y or on -site ponding is provided. This is to ensure that the added impervious surface created b negatively effe Y this project will not ne g y ect the properties along Footprint Pond, Recommendation Adoption of the ,resolution on page 11 approving the building addition to John Glenn Jr. High.School, based on the findings g required by ordinance and subject to the followin g conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated July 16, 1987, unless a change is approved by the city community design review board. 2. No grading, paving or building permits shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for the development of a new storm sewer system, or p y , until on -site pondi.ng is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels, CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the surrounding property owners within a 350 -foot radius for their questions and comments concerning this proposal. 78 questionnaires were mailed. Of the 29 replies, eight had no comment, nine were in favor, and twelve objected. Comments in Favor 1 . If there is a need to improve the facility to educate our children, I am in favor. 2. My children belong in the boundaries of John Glenn and would benefit. 3 I'm in favor if the school is in need of more room. 40 It saves breaking more ground for another school. objections 1. Five property owners commented that the do not want their tax Y property es to go up i f this s addition would be built. Staff comment: The applicant's letter on page 8 explains ' ,p g p that in February, 1987, a bond issue was passed by the voters approving the construction of this and several other facilities. Property taxes, could be effected since the Northeast Metropolitan Intermediate School District has levy authorit Y 20 Five property owners commented that no construction should take place until something is done to correct the flooding problem behind their homes in Footprint Pond, and also, the occasional overflow of the drainage ditch along Hazelwood Avenue. Staff comment: Staff is recommending that the construction of this project not begin until contracts are signed for a storm - sewer improvement project in this area or unless adequate on -site ponding can be provided. 30 "With empty schools available it seems wasteful doing more building." "With the opening of Maplewood Sr. High, I feel there is sufficient room to provide for any special education." Staff comment: According to Brian Buchmayer of Independent School District 622, federal laws and court interpretations require special education children to be educated with their peers. Maplewood Jr. High is not a feasible alternative since: a. 4 ,;. There are only -two or three rooms available, which are needed for anticipated growth. 2 b. The ,john Glenn addition would provide the long -term commitment of space needed for special education. c. The John Glenn location fits within the service boundaries established for special, education.. 4. Refer to the letter on page 10. Staff comment: a. It is unknown if damage to Hazelwood Avenue would occur due to the movement of heavy equipment during the construction of the addition. Typically, there is not any damage caused city streets by the normal operation of rubber-tired trucks when there are no load limits on the roadway. b. With the exception that the addition will be only one story, it will be the same as the existing building in materials and design. c . Refer to the staff comment under item two concerning storm runoff and flooding, REFERENCE Site Description 1. Acreage: 15.66 20 Existing land use: ,john Glenn Jr. High School and playgrounds (ball fields, tennis courts) Surrounding Land Uses The school property is surrounded by single dwellings and the Motech Machine Shop at the southeast corner of the property. Past Actions 10- 13 -77: Council approved plans for a 59 by 23 -foot storage -room addition to John Glenn Jr. High School, 9- 12 -83: Council rezoned this property to R -1. Land Use Plan Designation S, School 3 Ordinance Requirements ■ rrrr�r r 1. Section 36 -66. R -1 district permitted uses. In the R -1 residence district, no building or land, shall be used, and no building shall be erected, converted or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided herein, except for one or more of the following uses: (3) Churches, public, parochial and private schools, or other schools by special permit from the city council. 2. Section 36-17(e) of city code states that: (e) No existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the district in which such building or premises is.located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless: (1) Required by law or government order; or ( 2 ) There would not . be a significant affect, as determined by the city through a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned." 3* Section 36-442(b) requires that council make ten findings in order to approve.a conditional use permit. Refer to findings 1- 10 on page 11, 7 Attachments 1. Location Map 20 Property Line /Zoning Map 3* Site Plan (reduction) 4. Applicant's letter dated July 31, 1987 5. Letter from Joan and William Gallagher dated July 21, 1987 6. Resolution 7. Letter from Brian Buchmayer dated August 11, 1987 4 1 vt . K ONl 1 .�..__ 23 :., ROAD •C• t L„� 04EIitt1. A0. J � CS! Z 1� •� O � M ; �M � i W u t 25 : E A V. :E Av. r r.o 4. J Q t o JuqjTloN w REC A O ' '� f R0 T L w . - . eR•i�.is Lek f 62 �� � AVE R.[ it PRI 30 I II 11 I I II II II 11 III /�0 of ' F lo A K _ J W N s �l NA'l.t� rv *I am. s ['� • l 1 28 LOCATION MAP - 5 Attachment 1 j • . y • aft' 11 • ' • • �. y ' � 1 � •. s.a 411• ... LAURIE ROAD i , (0) (A a - j { 1)T (:SL) 1 1: Cj s 1a as •• � i 9. (14) ( $t) (�) (!6� (!+� _� �: .� (T) f i fib) " •� . a� �'s • � � oo to • If IOU w ;. �, `mot. W ss.., _ � . (So1 • (�1) ( � �� o t _ vow' • N • i ' �, CI, ,. . w• SAND H ST AV E . �'• _ k . • a 1 (t�11 ( ): • (3') (�) . ( aC� i bo I �° • � la � , ✓i • goo !4 � �( • a � �b � , o r _ t .• 1547 ) 565 - 1583 -- - -. - - •- _ ,at dbs 1 t � •� la• t� M • 't , � .' --7= ` ! • : �� • 40 010 �' p '° .• tC is µ) t . t7� + pl ism 155 1575 1593. Na a .� ....... _- — f�)f •' • I ..a '� � O � 4 i , t a � � � � 1 •�" It It . l..l. ( I • , 7 • s 4 3 j =. , 1 a �, S T •I'! 11 i qr�c ., R IV o i APARTMENTS 14 Is ICi �� I 1 ' �` i �' I �+' ) I •t' �� `� ION , � I z+ � � s• sl � I u u M rU I u • ITS • 7f. �'r .. . • • • . • Q M 3 R K E , AV E �o• 8 . C .wwv �..1 2125 la T T - JOHN GLENN JR. HIGH 2115 �+-- •.L ---� •.}_. ,_...,� _.._ c`� h) x • 1 _ is 14 G IT ) 1• is u Zi ss 1 1. • f ss Q1 00) (� >e O �s _..... � X21 7 � � M .� Itil) ~1A'1`�1 (40) r t .- to • •o .: - � ■ �, oft •t ae PROPOSED ADDITION I c r.,..__.._ A. CO • S • 2 s leaf O F OOT PRINT POND .� ,ell I re Co 1 O 111 � • O4j V. . •fit►) _� y Mw •�.. E M 7 01 ' • •� i ' : • t•` . ! t•�� as '•' dRtJ►T LA K C! pc 1 04" & (3) p n 01) - (4a s x� s �+ 4 3 s w 24 .. a i Q 1 '1 1 0 is .(act �,, s ROSEWOOD —� Igo Ir ' i4 �) X 4 t� �� s � A ._.__.,.• fit, • `� .>6>� � 1 s 1 • • PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N • 1 1 `• .1 •1'� Ir '' A r .. , 1: 1 ' . t : .t J 1 �•. r - 1. • • t. • MINNESOTA Q v z z W Y SITE PLAN • 1' OF ' i Attachment 3 N ORTHEAST METROPOLI'Ti INTERMEDIA1 SCHOOL DIS7 6 a 4'87 0 'Learning for the future . . . • July 31, 1987 Mr. Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Tom: Bill Martin recently spoke to me regarding ou we uestions re receivi n q you rel ated to the John Glenn addition. It is my understanding hat g y ou have received several inquiries y qu i ri es from area residents dents with regard to the use and cost of the facil The construction project has been developed and is n o by Northeast Metro - pol i tan Intermediate School District 916. As an intermediate district authori similar 1 ar ' w e have l evy Y y to that of an independent school district. In February 1987, a bond issue was put to the voters of nine area h sc ool districts including: Centennial, Spring Lake Park, Mounds View North St Paul /Mapl ewood /Oakdale, Roseville, White Bear Lake Mahtomedi South W � � ash i n g ton County and Stillwater. The purpose of the bond issue was to construct educational facilities for severely handicapped children in the northeast metro area. The bond issue passed and construction has begun, .Y We are presently building in three different school district s on four separate sites with construction planning underway in an additional two districts on three different sites, with long range. planning to build an additional four buildings in three other school districts. All total the c p roject � con p sect will include 100,000 square feet of new instructional space for the severely handi ca ed nd p • pp a valued at $13,500,000. No new additional costs wi be borne by res idents of the North St. Paul/Maplewood School Di st Distri ct aside from those approved by all nine previously listed school districts in the February bond election, I also understand that several questions have been received related to the use of. the existing John Glenn f a c i l i t y by students in the sp ecial education program. The integration of educati programs for the severely handicapped with regular education students is man dated by l aw. The nature and extent of that integration is determined through cooperative planning of arents teachers and administrators ' rs i n the cooperating districts, 8 Attachment 4 .i AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 3300 CENTURY AVENUE NORTH, WHITE BEAR LAKE MINNESOTA 55110 (612) 77 0 - 2351 2351 • Mr. Tom Ekstrand July 31 1987 Page- two I hope this an some of the questions that you have been asked to address. _ I would be happy to talk with anyone who has questions regarding the construc- tion if you simply refer them to me. Thank you for your help in this matter. Respectfully, Tom Tapper Director of Planning, Development and Facility Operations TT:Iz 9 s c n William L. Gallagher 2125 Hazelwood Ave. �7_a'.�97 t V� Maplewood, MN 55109 • C�tE� ce.a`'u -`° AA- P AAJ� 4 (1 9ILa AO 04f X0 x.¢4 LJ U - O `�- c -n-v. -+.off �✓+ �, Ctxc.a v- n-...r o-cu� �aw.,C. AAA-�... W L � 117 f /�"v`-e� -' �°'`�,�,,a �. /� -✓tea.. uo L�+-e, a�� d 3 = 14' •Attachment 5 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1987 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, N. E. Metropolitan Intermediate School District #916 initiated a conditional use permit to add onto. John Glenn Jr. High School at the following - described property: This property is also known as 1560 East County Road B, Maplewood; WHEREAS, , the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 1987.. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be . 2. The Maplewood City Council held a , 198 Notice thereof pursuant to law. All persons present at sa opportunity to be heard and present written also considered reports and recommendations planning commission, public hearing on was published and mailed id hearing were given an statements. The council of the city staff and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter, 29 The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present,,eand potential surrounding land uses., due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 11 Attachment 6 60 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traff i c on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area ro ert ies . P P 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and P arks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional re uirements at public cost for public facilities q P sties and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 1119 There would be no significant affect on the development o f this parcel as zoned. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated July 16, 1987 unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board, Y g 2. No grading, paving or building permits shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for the development of a P new storm sewer system, or until on -site ponding is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels. Adopted this day of , 1987. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 198 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city. this day of , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 12 NORTH ST. PAUL w MAPLEWOOD - OAKDALE SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT CHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622 S (612) 7 7 0 - 4 6 0 3 2055 E. L arp enteur Ave. Maplewood MN 55`109 August 1 1 , 1987 Tom Ecks t rand Planning Department City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN.. 55109 RE: John Glenn Addition Dear. Mr. Eckstrand: Given the nature of questions, which have been asked on the addition to John Glenn Middle School, I'd like to place the following information in writing so that you can share this information with interested persons. Facility Need During the last two years, the nine school districts which make up the special education cooperative of the Northeast Metro- politan Intermediate School District No. 916, (NMI 916) conducted an in depth study of facilities required to house special education programs for Trainable Mentally Retarded (TMR) children from these nine districts. The conclusions of that report stated that there was not adequate space available to house these children and space should be located for them. Through further contacts with the nine school districts it was determined that districts could not make a long terra commitment for the needed space; therefore, the building of space became the best solution. Placement of Space Federal regulations and court decisions have placed further restrictions on where special education space can be provided. Those restrictions require TMR children be placed at age appropriate levels: We are, therefore, required to have special education children of middle school age at a middle school. The nine district cooperative has determined that in the middle school these TMR children can best be served in the North St. Pau,k Maplewood- Oakdale Schools. We have determined that, because of population growth patterns and building configurations, John Glenn is the best location. 13 Attachment 7 Ali 1 t 1981 i Lt r , BCB to TE , City of Maplewood, 8-11-87, Subject: John Glenn Addition -- Continued I Additional Funding - On February 3, 1.987 , a successful bond election was held in the nine cooperating school districts. That election provided .monies to build the needed facilities. Immediate Need The need for this space is immediate. During the 1987 -88 school year, part of the TMR children will be housed in three classrooms at John Glenn. However, those rooms will not be available in 1988 -890 The new addition is scheduled to be complete by September of 1988 and will solve this immediate problem. S t o rim Sewer Delay To delay this project, at this time, because the City does not have a storm sewer improvement plan in place, will cause delays in our plan to provide adequate space for special education programs* Those delays 'affect the education which is provided to these TMR children. We do not believe a separate ponding area on school district property is the answer. This is an unnecessary expense. The solution to the problem should be determined by the City of Maplewood in the appropriate manner. In the meantime, the holding of this project hostage, pending study and action is not in the public's best interest. The cooperation of the City staff, and appointed and elected officials, to insure timely implementation of this project is appreciated. Sincerely, &UM c_ Brian C. Buchmayer Director of Business Affairs BCB:sc 2 . 14 Page 2 Planning Commi ss i n minutes 8 -17 -87 Mario Cocch i are l a, a partner in Sherman -Boosa is who i.s develop i ng property on Germ n Street, requested the hou on the North St. Paul side of German St eet be changed from a dou e- fronting lot. Commissioner Rossb ch moved approval of a resolution to delete the 9 nei hborhood park s arch area at German. treet and County Road B from the parks secti n of the comprehe sive plan. Approval is on the basis that: 1. The projected area opulation is significantly below that desired to support a neighborho d park. 2. The development of S rwo d Neighborhood Park (Cope Avenue and Kennard Street) was not a ti ipated when the parks section of the comprehensive plan was ado ed. Sherwood Park will be able to adequately serve the neigh rhood park needs of the residents in the subject area. Commissioner Cardinal conde Ayes -- Barrett, Cardinal, F i o l a, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach VI, VISITOR PRESENTATIO VII. COMMUNICATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Alley Vacafion: Between Fenton Walter and Gordon Tabled unti]/a later date. B. Conditional Use Permit: 1560 Co. Rd. B (John Glenn Jr. High) Brian Buchmayer, Director of Business Affairs for School District #622.9 B i l l Martin, architect for the project, and Dave Ki ewatt, Special Education Administrator for district #916, were present and discussed the project with the commissioners. Bill Gallagher, 2125 Hazelwood Avenue, discussed the past problems with flooding he has experienced on his property. Commissioner Cardinal moved adoption of the resolution approving the building addition to John Glenn Jr. High School, based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. ,,.' 2. No grading, paving or building permits shall be issued until construction contracts have been signed for the development of a new storm sewer system, or until on -site pondi ng is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels. Page 3 Planning Commission minutes 8 -17 -87 Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes -- Barrett, . Cardinal, Fiol a, .Fischer, Larson, Rossbach C. Floodplain\Map Amendment and Variance; Kell Parkway (Kath) Commissioner Cardinal moved: I. Approval of t e resolution to revise /atna Flood Hazard Overlay District Map to c nge the building site 15 —foot buffer. strip around the buildin from Zone A to tone ne A is within the 100 —year flood plai and Zone C is outsf the flood plain. (At least four votes in favor are requir r approval.) 2. Approval of the r solution to appro e a 25 —foot setback variance to allow a dwelling to be located 50 f et, rather than 75 feet, from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) f r Kohlman Lake, on the basis that: a. Strict enforceme t of the oning code would cause undue hardship because of c rcumst ces unique to the individual property under conside ation because: 1) The property cairn t be put to a reasonable use under the conditions allo d by the official controls because the property is too arrow to permit compliance. 2) The plight of he landowner is due to circumstances unique to their oper not created by the landowner. This property w Great d before a building setback was required from t e lakesh re. b. The variance w u 1 d be in k ping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. If approved, the variance would not alter the essential ch racter of the 1 ca 1 i ty because: 1) Eight xisting dwellings 1 from the ohlman Lake OHWM - -t setbacks to that proposed, re located less than 75 feet ree of which have s i m i l a r 2) Th s is the last lot of reco d on this lake that cannot be pu to a reasonable use if thi setback requirement were to b strictly enforced. 3) The vegetation located along the shoreline and on the n therly two — thirds of this property would not be disturbed ring construction. Commissio er Larson seconded Ayes - -Barre t, Cardinal, Fiola .-" Fischer, Lar on, Rossbach MEMORANDUM action by Coun T0: City Manager FROM: Associate Plann SUBJECT: Flood Insurance LOCATION: Keller Parkway, APPLICANT: Cynthia Kath OWNER: R v D.. and J. D . DATE: August 12, 1987 Endorsed,.. Modified ,„ �e� ec er -- ,Johnson Date Rate Map Amendment and Variance North of County Road C Investment Company SUMMARY I ntroduction The applicant is requesting a rezoning to revise the city's flood insurance rate map.(pages 9 and 1� y ) and a shoreline setback variance to construct a single dwelling on an existing parcel adjoining Koh � g lman Lake. The shoreland ordinance requires a setback of 75 feet. The house can only be set back 50 feet because of insufficient lot depth. (See the site plan on page 7.) Background The applicant has received approval from the Corps of Engineers, gineers, the Department of Natural Resources and the Watershed District to fill portion of this property to create a building pad, a Discussion Flood Insurance Rate Map Amendment: The elevation of the proposed building site would be raised to the established flood protection elevation for this area, Once the grading is completed, the Department of Natural Resources will request the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA letter of flood hazard map correction �� ) to issue a " to the property wner. Flood be filled, l led y d .hazard areas may , provided the fill l l wi l l not obstruct flood flows, The Watershed District has made this finding Setback Variance This variance meets all the criteria for a ca PP ro that the property nnot be built on without a and intent of the ordinance would be met since complied with as much as possible the setback character with adjacent homes, and there would feet of the shoreline. Recommendation val. The hardship is variance. The spirit the setback is being would not be out -of- be no grading within 40 1. Approve the resolution on page 11 to revise the Flood Hazard Overlay District Map to change the building site and a 15 -foot buffer strip around. the building from Zone A to Zone C. Zone A is ' within the 100 -year flood plain, and Zone C is outside of the f lood la ' least four votes in favor are required for approval.) p in• (At 2. Approve the resolution on a e 13 to approve P g pp ove a 25"-foot setback variance to allow a dwelling to be located 50 feet rather feet, from the ordinary high ' ra er than 75 y g water mark (OHWM) for Kohlman Lake, on the basis s i s that: a .. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, because: 1) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use under the conditions allowed by the official controls because the property is too narrow to permit compliance. 2) The plight of the landowner is due to ' circumstances unique to their property, not created by the landowner. This property was created before a building etback was s required from the lakeshore. b. The variance would be in keeping with the ' P g e spirit and intent of the ordinance. If approved, the variance would not alter h t e essential character of the locality because: 1) Eight existing dwellings are located less than 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake OHWM- -three of which have similar setbacks to that proposed. 2) This is the last lot of record on this lake that cannot be put to a reasonable use if this setback requirement we enforced q re to be strictly . 3) The vegetation located along the shoreline and on the northerly two- thirds of this property would not be disturbed during construction. REFERENCE Site Description Gross lot area: 2.73 acres (118,800 square feet) Area above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) : 37, 800 s uare _ q feet (Refer to the Planning Section for the definition of OHWM. Shoreline: At the OHWM, this site has about 700+ feet of shoreline Existing land use: undeveloped Prominent vegetation: numerous hardwood trees with at least six inches ,.of trunk d i ameter . Refer to the grading plan on page P p g 7. 2 Surroundin g Land Uses North: A single dwelling East and South: Kohlman Lake West: Keller Parkway. Across the street is Gervais Lake, Planning 1. Zoning: R -1 single dwelling 20 Compliance with land use laws: Section 462.357, Subdivision 6 requires that the following findings be made before a zonin g variance can be granted: a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship. because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. b. The variance would be in keeping the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. Section 36 -566 (c) (2) (b) of the Shoreland Ordinance requires single dwellings to be set back at least 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake ordinary high water mark (OHWM). 4. Section 36 -564 defines OHWM as "A mark delineating the highest water level which has been maintain g • maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape. The ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial." The Department of Natural Resources has established the 859.5 contour elevation as the OHWM for Kohlman Lake* ( Refer to the pages maps on a es 6 and 7.) 5. Section 36-497(a) of the Flood Plain Ordinance states: The Flood Insurance Rate Map for the city, dated August 5, 1986, developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is hereby adopted by reference as the Official Flood Plain Zoning District Map and made a part of this ordinance (zoning code), 6. Section 36 -505 states "all amendments (to the flood plain) ordinance, including revisions to the Official Flood Plain Zoning District Map shall be submitted to and approved by the commissioner of natural resources prior to adoption. The flood plain designation on 3 the Official Flood Plain Zoning District Map shall not be removed unless the area is f illed to an elevation at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation and is continguous to lands outside of the flood plain. " . Comment: The building site is proposed to be filled to comply with the first floor flood protection elevation of 864.6 feet. The applicant's grading plan (page 7) is acceptable to the Watershed District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Department of Natural Resources will accept it, provided the ground elevation within 15 feet of the structure is increased to an elevation of at least 863.6 feet. (See Public Works comments.) Public Works 10 The 100 -year flood plain for Kohlman Lake includes property below the.863.6 contour elevation. 2. The regulatory flood protection elevation is defined as an elevation of not less than one foot above the 100 -year flood plain. In the case of this property, the lowest floor must have an elevation of not less than. 864.6 feet. Section 36-499(b) (4) also requires the finished fill elevation to be no lower than one foot below. the regulatory flood protection elevation extending 15 feet beyond the limits of the structure. 3. Sanitary sewer is available. j 1 Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed Site Plan 4. Letter of Justification 5. Flood Insurance Rate Map (present) 6. Flood Insurance Rate Map (proposed) 7. Resolution (Flood Hazard Map) 8. Resolution (Variance) 4 a ry OF F / Cr R '� - • W F U Y w F _ - Ml R o CO R 8C • �• F MI � 1 '_J R MI MI • MI M� F - - • TRVwt _. MI _ F Ml SOPE r R Q c Tr �� PUO . R # v R (�" �- F ,, u+ Q► ( R DEL A NO r � A 9. RE of „~ R R- A VAE 4 si ric I.- %All •�E • ! • I MLMON T ,+• AVE- 1 �. F . a2 • uJ i i ! RYAN s AVE L X4 _. Si 0 1R f a a R Rw� Rl RI l"op IV 3 J LOCATION MAP '� 4 5 Attachment 7 a i • 1 '. + 1 0 1 • r 3S -was L r � ` #4 1L1 • # 5 OWN :�-,) : ,..„ . �. • 06 Approximate Location of Ordinary ter 4 , High Water Mark (OHWM) Ai \ ADA w • f , r• . . fir.' .9t r 1 �q0 h) lr t (, C) !r1 dq lNJ f3i I . «.... ,ar. # AOV 'f - e i LOT :. ,► • LAS..+ 4.41.ie.• i ';► • \ .Proposed building site y �� o e q p ■ a116aaaraaEaEa� ar•■ no asaaaRaaaMIaar >� moo All R1 I isle • - --_ _ '3-_ Ct�UN TY - -- ROAD""'. , f•: . Dwellings with less than 75 feet of setback to the OH .. WM: (See dwelling numbers above.) #1 — 60 ±' #3 — 50 ±' # 5 _ 60+ # _ 50 +' #2 — 55 ±' #4 — 65 ±' _ ' #g _ 5 +' #6 60� 0_ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 N / / too � dOo -red bvf•2 � / � �� � � e,.* jo, ` 1W L AV f in ji ( lb- INN r • • 4/ 2 Flood Protection Elevation 864.6 feet r' PROPOSED SITE PLAN ••• :--•••� 75 —foot building setback l i n e from the ordinary high water elevation • 7 Attachment 3 April 14, 1987 Cynthia Kath 610 Capitol Boulevard Saint. Paul, Minnesota -55103 Appeals Application City of Maplewood j 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 To Whom it May Concern; This letter is in request for a zoning code variance, reguarding lakeshore setback. I am designing a home for the property legally described; Lot 6, Kohlman Division, Maplewood, Minnesota. This property is located on Kohlman Lake. I am in need of this variance because without it, there is no other way to use this property, I would like to note that the setback of 50 feet is not out of character with the other homes on Lake Kohlman. Since ely y Kath 8 Attachment 4 _County Rood - D Explanation Zone A - 100-Year Floodplain Zone C Areas � of minimal flooding ( shading) Source Federal Emergency Management Agency ' 40 40 • . • • • : . : • . .. - - _,_ ............. .....•....... . ................ 40.40............ • • . '. . . . . . . .. 00.0 . . . . . . . . • . . . . -. . . . . .•.: : : •: . • ......40.40 .. .... .. - • . . ."�""'.� . . .'.•.'.'. -. • .'. - . : • . • . •00• 40 40 • • • • • : loft . •'•••'•'•'•'•'•••'•'•••••' :.'.40.40 : ♦.. . . ZONE C 40.40•••- 4040.•::.............•.: -. .... ............ .... - .................... ... . .... . . . .40.40.•. ... . . . . . . . .- 40 . . • 0 . 6 0 . 0 . 000.0 ..... 40 40.•.•.:. ; ...'.- :.:•.- .40.40.•.•....• ....... ...• .....'.•......... . ".'o . . • . . . . . . . .• • .:. -... .........- .•.- .:- ...... ...:.- ..•..............- .4040•.:. . ..... ...... ................... i .• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. • 40 . 40 .•.•.• . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • -:•: -• 4040 - 4040•••• -4040. 4040•- •- •- •- •- •�.�.•.••... . . . . 0 40 40 40 0 . 40 . • • • • • . . . . . . . . ......•.z• .......... 40...• •. ..... ......40.40 - •�.•...... -....• . • 40.40.._ ............ . .•. -: . 40 . 40 . '•• : •: 40 - . - : • : 40 : 40 :•: • : •: :.•: : . • •... -.'.'. •.•.•.•.•••.••• :..... ;. .'.40::.:.40. -.• ... 40....40.'.'.•. -.•.- .40.'.40.- ................... ................ . • • • • 0000.0."::: • ••:•'••' - •- • • • - •. . • :40.40• -4040. •- • • • • •- • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • �• • • • • . . • • • 4040 • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •.•�•� 40 40 • • • • • s • •. 40 40 40 40 • • : :: 4040 • • - ' .•`••••40400 40 • • • : :40 4040•' • • • 0 � - 40 ZONE' ..•...' 00 .- .....'.- . -.'.• ' • • 'ZONE• .40.40. - 4040.•.•.- .40.. ..............• .40.40 . . • - 40 ' 40 • 40.40• ;. - •0.0.040.400.0•.400.0.0.0.0.0. 40 40 • • • • 4040• -4040•: : : • ; : 4040 �• ;� •40•• - : ' 40 0 : ' • • : •••• '• • • • x •••• • • • • '�••'•• 40 • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • 40 •- 4040. -.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . • • 4040.•.'•••- 4040• 4040 ••� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40• . • • • • 40 • •: • :.0: • • • • • 4040•',' •••••• '040,•• • • • 40 • 0 • • • • • • . - •• • • ' • ♦ . • • • • • • , - • • • • • • • • • 0 * • • • • .0.. • • • • • • • • • •': 4040••:: . • • • 40 • ••-• 40, :4040 -4040 • • • • ' 40 • • � `'••••�• • • • • • • • • • •• . 0 40 40 .• '.4040•.'• • • • . • • • • 40 • • • • • • • • • • • .'• • • 40 • •- • • • • •' . • • •0••0•: ••• 'Va • . • ••• • • • 40 • • . • . ♦ 40 - 40 • • • • • • • • •,•••, 0 • • •••••• • 0 . 0 ••• 0 . 0 •'•• • • • • • • • : • - • ' • • • • • • • • • • 40 i • : 0.0. 0• • • • • • • • .4040 • • - • • • • • • • • 40 • • • • • • ;40 • . • • • • • •'�'• 40 ••i 4040- • - - - -: • 4040• • 0 • : 4040 4040.'•'• 40 40 • • • • • • • • a 0 0 . • • • • • • • •.. •••� 4040 • • • • • •�• • • ;40 • • • 4040 40 00 40 • • • • . -•' -:• • • :40 • • • • -• : :.•••••••4040 • • • . • • • - • •. • • • 0 . • 0 • .0.0.0• .0• ;•.40.•'.'•'.0••••.• • •00. • 40 40 0 0 •0•.•'.•0'.' • . 0 r • 4040 •..••••'•'• • 40 - 40 4040•••• • • • 40 - • • / • - 40 40 • • 40 40 • • 40 `4040 :4040 40 •00.00•, '•,•••� 40'40'• - 4040•`••• • •.- • • • • 40 40 • • 40 •. • - • • • • •�•'•'•40•' 40 40'40 40'40 4040••• :, 4040 • • •`. ••••••••••- •• 0 •40 '••40••••••••• • -4040 : • :0 :: -•0• • •• 0.0 :. -• -- - • : •••'.•40 -:.' • • •••'•'� • • • • 40 40 - 40 , 40 4040••'••• •0•••- 40'•- ••••••40'0'••40••'40'•. '••.`•'.•40'•••0••1•.••'.`•••••• ♦ : • •••••••040••'•'•••• • 40 • • � • �• 40 • • • • • • . ' • • • • 40 40 40 • • • • • 40 • • • • • • • • • • • 40'40 ••.'.�••• :• • • • • • • • • • -40'.•• ••40 40 40 40 • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 g• • • • • • • • • • 40 • - • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • G • • • • • 4040•' • • • • • • • 40 40• •. • . .40:40 .• •. . . . . . . . . U k,• . . . - • . . • . . . . . . • .'. . . . . . .• • • •.- :• 4040•• • 400• ` • • • ' 0 � �� � • • • 40 - � • • :. - : • 40 40•' 4040••••`- •••••••• • 40 '• 40 - 40 .�• 4040. 4040••••- •••••••••'• • 0.0.0.0••• • • • _ �_ 40 - : : - : - •40•• -• - • - :. ' • • . • • 0 • • • •40••••••4040•••• • 40 40 • L • , 4040•• 440.0.0 -40.40. 4040•• ;0.0••••.•• •40'40••'••• -• 4040. - 40 •• • • 0• ' • • • 40 •'40•N ♦•0.•• 40 • ` 40 - 40 • - • ••••�• ♦0 •••0.'.000. • :• :•'. -40'40• -• .••••�♦•.• • • • 40 • 40 • • • • 40 • • • • - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '0 • • • • '. •. • • • • 0 . 0 • • • • • • • •: • • 4040• • -• • 40'40 • • ♦ ♦' • • • 40 . 0 • • • • • • • • • ::• :0: •40• • • • • • • • • • • • • •400x 40 • • • • 40 • • 40 • :• •0.0• -4040• • • • • • • JJ0• •' • • • • • • • 40 00'40'.• • • 40 • • • • • 4040:•'•• • • • • •'• • •• • 4040• • • 40 • • • • • ::.: ` • • 40 - .. :�.• ;• ;• •� - • : ; • ♦4040 : . : : : : : : ' : •40 ' 400 •••••••••�••-� ♦ :': :• : 40 • •40•• •••••••••• -� -• •': •i - • 40 ' 0 • •• - � • � : ♦ : 40 : : ♦': 40.40 ♦ 4040• • • : : • •... •...... •....... ..... 4040••....•.. - 40 . • • . •'.'.'.'. •. . . . . . . ... . . 40 • • . . • • . . . . . . . • . . .'.•: •- .'.'.•.': . . . . • • . '.'.'.' . ' ♦ • • . . . . .' • • • o' . .. . . . . . •. . . . . . - . .'. .'• . . .'.•.'. •.'.'.': .'.'.'.'.. . . . .'.'.- .'.•.' :. : -. •.'.• : ..40 . . . 0 . . . . . .. •0- •40.•40400• . . . . .'.'.•.- •- 40'::0. . . • • . . . . . . . . . • ♦ . . . . .. • • . 40 • . ... -0 . • . ..'.•.'.': .40.'.40.• . . . . . . . . 40 ... . •'. 40.. 40 ...'.'.'•'.'40'.'.'.•.'.':.' .•.•...'.•.••'.'.'.'.'.'.•.••': • . .. • . • • 'D • ♦ . ...•.' • • .......' ...... .'- •`•40.0• 40 • .•.'.'.'. •.'.'.' ..•400• • 40 0 40 0 • • 40 • • - 40 ' :40: '.'•'!••••.•,••40 . • •••••0• :'•- 40'40' : :• :• 0 • 40 4040••••• • •�. 40 ; . . • • - 40 40 . • . . ••0.0.0 . :'. •.'.: '.'•'••40••'•'.••'40'40'40•••: : :•.'.'.'.'. - ;•, •••••••• -.'. : :40.40.: '•': 40 - . ;•; ::: •'' •� . 40 . .. . . . . . ... .. . 40 .'.4040. .. . . . ♦ .. ♦ . .'.'..•. .. .. . . . . .. • .. •• - .•.•.'.'.'. 4040 . • 40 .. • . • . •. •.'.'. 40..40. . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . • • . . . . . • . . . • . . .. . . . . . . .... .....40.. ....... •... ♦.40... 40 .........40.... •.. '.- .'.'.'.•.' • :: •'.'. .. • 40.40- •••�•�•••�•�• •-••. •.•.•.�.�.•........••'•'.'.'.•: 4040.'.'.'... • .:'.'. , ....... • . • 40 • ....•.... . .4040... •.. 40 .......40.... �•. • . • • • • . . • • . . . • . • . . . . . • • • • . .••40 • 0 • . -: ♦'.'.4040. . ♦ r •. 0 0•x'••40'40• . . . .•.'. :•. • .... •...'... 40. .. 40 ......•..... ♦40 4040•. • • • X . .... ...�.•.•.�... • ....... :. :'. •.•.•••.•�••.... . • • • • • • • . • • • • • 40 40 • • • • • • i • • • • • 40 . : :: •: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 �•� -,��• • • • • . • • • • • • • • 40 • • • • 000 • • • • • : ::0:�:♦ - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••0:: 40.40 :• • • • • • • • • • • • 40 • • • • • • • • • 40 • ::. •••40.0•• • 4040 - ♦ • 00 • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 • • • • • . • 00. • • • • :: • :•: • :4040• • • • • • • • • • • • . • • 40• : :::: • • • • • • • • • • • 40 • •••••••,• • • - �• 40- •� 40 • • 40 • • • • • � • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . 40 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - • • • • • • 4040•`.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • : :. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • 40 : - X • • • 'a • • • • • • • • 40 40 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • f • •�• :� ♦- • • • • :':• : :': :: 4040••••:• •••0••40 • • :40• - •••040' • •:• '• :':.': 40 40 ' 0•: • • : • :• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ♦ • • • • • 4040•••- • • • • • • • • • 40 • :• • • • • f • • • • • • ,•,• x • 40 40 ,40: .• • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • : :• • • • 40•.•40: 0•.,• : • • • • • • • ♦ �• :: 4040••• ::•: • • 4040 :•':::40 • ••4040••• -�' ♦4040 • • : • 4040 ♦ 40 ..40.......40: .. ' ...•........ �... •.......•.•.•.•.•. 0 • 0 • •.'.•.•.•.•.• .... •.. . :• ........40.40. t Road •: Coun R° C 40.•.•.• • Z C. ON E .......... .......... . . • • 711 FLOODPLAIN MAP (Present) 9 Attachment 5 IC N '".county Rood Q Expl anation Zone A - 100 Year Floodplain Zone C - Areas of minimal flooding (No shading) Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency age 4040 • 4040. . 4040 4040. 4400. 4040.. 4040... 4040... 4040.... . 4040.... • 4040..... 4040.... 4040.... 0 o' . . • • .......... ........... ........... . ........... 4040. ........•. 4040- .......... . 040 . 4040. ..�.. �► .•.•.•:::.•::.•.•.•.•.•.•. ................ •••• . • • . 40 : :. .• ♦•.•.•.•: • . .•.•.'.•.'.•.'.' .•.•.' :.' :.•. . . . . . .•. •.••''•.'• .212 M_ •........... . . . ....... 4040.. 4040..■ ......•........•...... 4040. 0 •...............•..... 4040•♦ T .• .................... 4040. ZONE C ••0 ............. 4040.. 4040 . . • • . . • . . . . . . . . . 40 •. . . . . . . . 4040. . . . . . . . 0 . . ......... ........• .- 40'40.'.. 4040.. . . . . . . . . • . . . 4040 4040. • • . . . • • . . . • . . . .. - . - . - 4040 . . . 4040 . . . . 4040 • . • 4040. . . 4040 . . • ♦ • • . • . 4040.. . . . . . . 40 . 4040. . . . . . . . . . • •'• . •.• . • • . . : • a . • . • . • . • : • : • : • : • . • 0 . 0 4 0 • ................. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • 0' •• • 4 4 •'• • • • • . • • • • • a - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • . • • • • . * 0 0 . 0 . 0 . • • • • . • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • •'• • • • • '• • .w • • • • • • • • • • • • - • . a, . 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 . • • • • •. . 0 0 % • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * 0 • . • • ••�. ♦ . ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 40 • • ' • • • • • • • 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • :•: : ♦ • •••••0.0.0• • . • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • 0 • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 ••••:••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • . • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • ••: • •.••'• ::•••. • • 40 4 4 4 0 04 •4 •••• • • • • • • • • • . • • � • • �� • �•� .� 0 • . • • • • ••••••.•••••••••••••••_40 .0 •••••••••••• • ♦••••.•.'.• :•- . • • • • • • • ••• : •.4 :•. :'••.•.: �••• :•:� • � 4040 : 4 •4040::•: •• • • • • 'r • • • • • • • age • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • 4044• • • • • • • -. � • � 00000000 404,0- .'.'.•.•.•.�.•.•.•Z JNE� q ...................... a .. 4040•. 0.0 WN EA • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4040. . .•.•.•.• .- ........... 4040.... ...................... 4040. . . . . . 4040 4040. . 4040. . . 4040 . • . . . 4040 . 4040. . . 4040 4040 . . .•.•.•.•. .• . . . . . . . . . . . 4040 • . . • 0 • • • • • 4040 4040 . . . . • . 4040 . 4040 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.• . . . . . . . 4040. 4040 . 4040 . 4040 0.•40.0• . . • • . 4040. . . • • . . • • . • 0 . . . . .0. . . . . . . . . . . ♦ . 4040 • 4040 . . .• •. 4040 4040 . 4040 4040 . .•.•.•.•. 4040 . 40 40 40 •: 40.40 . . . 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •. •' . . . . . . 4040.. ........ ......... ••.•.•.•.•,•,• 4040..... •......•.........•.•.•.•.•.• 4400.... •' 4040..... 4040 4040 .........•.•.•.•.• ''.... 40 40 •. •:-:a:- •••.•. 4404.• • • • , .. . . . 40 . . . . 4 40 4 . . . . • . . . . . . . . 4, 0• ;. 4;. 4,40• • •• •• • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • ♦• • • 4 :• • • • • • • • • • ' • • '• • • • • ♦• ' 0 ► • • • • • • . • • • ••• • . •'• • • • . . . • • • • • • • • • 0 • ' •• • •• . ♦ • • • • 0. •• • • �• •'• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • • • . 4, . 0 :4 • • • • • • • ' • . - ••• • - • • • •• :• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • 4044 0 . 0 0 0 ' . . 6 • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • • ••• • • :• •• • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • . • • • 4 •• • • • • • • •• • : :�. • . • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • 404 • • • 4,4,44 . . . .0, • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • 4040 • • • • • • 4040 • •• 'r•0••• •' .• ' • • •'••.•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40 4 • • • • • • • • 4 • 440 • • • • • • .• • • • 0 � 0 • • • • .. 04, • 4, • • • • • 4 4 4 0 4440•: ••••.•.•.•1. 1 ••• •.•.•.•. •• • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • •: 4 40 4 . ' . 4 4 4 4 .••4 4404 4 ••• • ••• .' • . •0• • • :. • . 4, :::. • ::. • :: • • • • • :*:*:a:.::::::: • • • • • 4404 0 ••• ••••••••••••••••0• • • • • • • • . ' • • s • • • • • • • • .4.�• • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • 40 .• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • .• 4 • •• • • 40 ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .�.• • • : 40 • ••• • • • • • • 00.00000.0-6. 4 • • • • • •' • • • 4 • • : • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • - • • . • • • • •• • • • • . • • '. •• • • • • • •.. . • ♦ ••• • • . • • ♦ • • • • • ♦ • • • • 40 . • • 4400 40 ���•�• • • •• •• • • • • 4 • • • • • . • ♦ - • • ��••• -� • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• ......�.,ka�N�on ...•. ....... .................•.•.•.•.•�•.•� 4040 4040. ' •..........•.'.•. -- ........ : ••:.•..... .................. • 4040. 4040.. 4040.4040 4040 • ••' ...........•.• •.•.• �•.• :...•..........•.•. :.•.•.4,. ..................•.• 4040.... . ••�: , 40 4 0 ., 4040 40 . . 40 ••. • . • i ••••.••• • • • • • . . . • • • . . •.•.•.•.•.•:.•..•.•. 4040 . . . ♦ .•.4.•.•:•,•.•0...= 4400 ,4040.• 4040- .............. ........ 4040. 4040 ........ 4040. •. •.•.•:.• 40.0. •. 4,400. -4040... ...•..• ..............•... ...•.•.,.............�• 4040... 40 40.. . . 4040. 40 4040. .� . . . . . . . . . . 4040... 4040. . 4040 . . . -. 4040. 4040 . . . . . 4040 40 .•.•..,.... . 4040 • . . . .•..'.•... • • • • • ••• • • • • • 4404 • 4040 • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • • • 4 • • • • •- • :. ' ::• • • • 0 • • ' • • 0 • • •• :r • • • 0 • • • • ••• • • • 0 • • • • .•0•..0 :� • • • 4, ••• • • . • • . • • • • • .•••.•0•r• 4 :• • • • • • • • * • • • • • • • • • .• . • • • • • • • •'• • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • 4 �.•• • • • • • • • • • • . • • • ••• • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • •: 4 4 4 4: ' • • • • • • • • • 4 •�• : 0 .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 •x• 0 . 0 • �•�.•• 4 4 4 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • •4040 . .•••••.•.•.'••.•�•0•�•••�• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • . •• • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . . . w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • 4040• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• : : • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • 0 0 • . 0 • • • • 0 • • . ♦ • • ♦ • • • 0 0 • . 0 • 0 0.0� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • 0 • • • • • • • • • • - 40 . • 4 •. •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . f • • • • . • • • • • • • • ••• 4 •4.0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 • :0 40 • • • • • • • :. : : 4, . • • • . • .�• • . • • • 0 • • • • . • • • � 4 ,. • • ••�•�•�.••�•�•� • �•••••�••• • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4.40. :•• • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • 0 • • g 40• :• 0 . • • • : ::•: • 0 • r 4 • . • • • • • • 40 40 400 • • • -• • • • • • . . • . • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 40 • • 4404 • • • • • • • • . • • • • ♦ • . • • • ••••� • • • • • • . • . • • • . • • • • • • 40 • • 4 • . • 4: •.•.�: 4 • i 4040 : ••• • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • . . 0 • • • • • • • • . • • • • •• • • • • . . . • • • • • • • • • . • • • : ♦ 4040 •: : • • • • • • • 4 • • • • • • • • • • . • 4404 • • • • • • • • • 9 • 440 • • • . • 4 4 4 4 • • • • • • • • • . • • • f • s • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 404 : • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • * • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • . • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ . • • • • • • • • 4 4040 • • • • • • • • 4404 • • ••.•••••• •••••••••••••• •• ••• •• 4440• •••::::•:• ••••••••• 4440•• 440 • ••4•.• :.'. �••• • �• •••••••• •••••••. 4440 • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 4040 i•♦' X-0 • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 4040 • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • w • . . • • • • • • • • • • ♦ . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • .• : • . • • • • • • • •••• ♦�• • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • •�•i 4040: 4 4 • X4.•.•.•••4• • • • • • • • • • . • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • : •: ••• 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • 4040. • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . . • C �, ♦ • • • • • • • • • ::::::.44 ••:.:•.• • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4040 :•.• �•K` �• • Count Rood C ZONE C -=w,,/ � 4040•..•• • • • ♦ • •, : i 4040•• or FLOGDPLP,IN MAP (Proposed) N 10 Attachment 6 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1987 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Cynthia Kath initiated a rezoning to amend the August 5, 1986, Flood Insurance Rate Map from Zone A to Zone C for a portion of the following described property: Lot Six, Kohlman Division, except the northeasterly triangular part measuring 25 feet on the east line and 208.15 feet on the north line WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36 Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on August 17, 1987. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1987 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was ubl i shed and mailed pursuant to P p law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following g findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent.with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. 'The proposed. change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property i ad • acent to the area 7 included in the proposed change or plan s adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare... 11 Attachment 7 49 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. ' 5. The proposed filling within the 100 -year flood plain of Kohlman Lake will not obstruct flood flows. Adopted this day of , 1987. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA } COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } I. the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 1987 with the original on file in my off ice, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning to amend the city's flood insurance rate map. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood. 12 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of g g the City Council.of the City of Maplewood Minnesota was s duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day f P 1987 at 7 .m. Y The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Cynthia Kath applied for a setback variance for the' following-described property: Lot Six, Kohlman Division, except the northeaster) triangular Y part measuring 25 feet on the east line and 208.15 feet on the north line, WHEREAS, section 36 -566 (c) (2) (b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum building setback of 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake ordinary high water mark; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 50 feet of setback i l requiring uirin g a variance of 25 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on April 23, 1987. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning August 17 1987. The Commission on Au g , e planning commission recommended to the city council that said variance be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearin g on 1987, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was ublished and mailed pursuant to law. All p • persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and resent written P statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city taff and planning commission, Y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the zoning code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual 1 property under consideration, because: a. The property cannot be put to a reasonable use under the co�fiditions allowed by the official controls_ because the ro ert P P Y is too narrow to permit compliance. 13 Attachment 8 b. The plight of. the landowner is due to circumstances unique to their property, not created by the landowner. This property was created before a building setback was required from the lakeshore. - 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. If approved, the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality because: a. Eight existing dwellings are located less than 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake OHWM.- -three of which have similar setbacks to that proposed. b. This is the last lot of record on this lake that cannot be put to a reasonable use if this setback requirement were to be strictly enforced, c. The vegetation located along the shoreline and on the northerly two - thirds of this property would not be disturbed during construction. Adopted this Seconded by STATE OF MIN14ESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) day of , 1987. SS. Ayes -- I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1987, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to shoreline setback variance. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood 14 Page 3 Planning Commission minutes 8 -17 -87 Commissioner Rossbach seconde Ayes--Barrett, • . Y Cardinal, F�ola. her, Larson, Rossbach • C. Floodplain Map Amendment and Variance: Keller Parkway (Kath) Commissioner Cardinal moved: 1. Approval of the resolution to revise the Flood o d Hazard Overlay District Map. to change the b u i l d i n g site and a 15 -foot buf . from Z er strip around the building one A to Zone C. Zone A i s within n the 100 -year flood p 1 a i n, and Zone C is outside of h • 1 east t e f lood pl a� n. (At four votes in favor are required q d for approval.) 2. Approval of the resolution to approve a • PP 25 -foot setback variance to allow a dwelling to be located 50 feet, rather than 75 feet, h water from the ordinary Y g e mark (OHWM) for Kohlman Lake, on the basis that: a. Strict enforcement of the zoning ode would b g cause undue hardship e ause of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, because: 1) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use under the conditions allowed. by the official controls because the property is too narrow to permit compliance. 2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to their property, not created by the landowner. This property was created before a building setback was required from the Lakeshore. b. The var iance would—be i �nAee_pj �h- _ • i • -ng� sp-a � a -e-n -t o the o rd i n ance. If approved, the variance would not alter the essential character of the localit Y because: 1) Eight existing dwellings are located less than 75 feet from the Kohlman Lake OHWM- -three of which have i ' s molar setbacks to that proposed. 2) This is the last lot of record on this lake that cannot be put to a reasonable use if this setback requirement were to be strictly enforced. 3) The vegetation located along he shoreline e and on the northerly two - thirds of this property would not be disturbed during construction. Commissioner Larson seconded A es - -6 rr • r; y a ett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach r-S MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: Introduction City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Variances and Lot Split Brooks Court Dave Morris Action, by Council: Endorsed......... Modified.,.... Re* eoted. Date Roberts Properties and Peter Dey (Contract Owner) August 20, 1987 The applicant is requesting approval of a lot division (page 6) and the following two variances: 1. A 1,270-square-foot lot area variance, The proposed area of Lot 21 would be 8,730 square feet. Code requires at least 10,000 square feet. 2. A 7 -1/2 foot lot width variance. The proposed lot width, at the setback line, would be reduced to 67.5 feet. Code requires at- least 75 feet. Background This house was mistakenly located five feet onto Lot 21 by the homeowner ( Peter Dey) and the builder ( Dave Morris) . The house is now occupied. Lot 21 was owned by Roberts Properties. When they were informed that the house encroaches on their lot, they insisted that Mr. Morris purchase the lot. Alternatives 1. Divide the lot with a V- shaped line. (See map on page 6.) This would maximize the lot frontage and area, but would require an additional variance - code requires that lot lines sha l l be substantially at right angles to the street. It may also cause lot line problems between the adjacent owners, such as grass cutting and landscaping, because of the irregular line. Fencing would define the line, but it would make the unusual shape more apparent and appear out -of- character with the neighborhood. 2* Approve a straight line, five feet from the house. ( See page 7.) The applicant favors this plan. This would eliminate the diagonal lot line variance, but would increase the lot area and frontage variances. Recommendation Approval of the lot division shown on page 7 and adoption of the resolution on page approving a 1,270- square -foot lot area variance and a 5 -foot lot width variance for Lot 21. Approval is based on the findings that : 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the house to the west has a sideyard setback of approximately 20 feet. Therefore, a house on Lot 21 would not appear crowded, even though the lot width would be less than required. . 2. The character and appearance of the neighborhood would be maintained. 3. If the lot split and variances were denied, Lot 21 could not be put to reasonable use. REFERENCE Surrounding Land Uses 1. A developing single - dwelling neighborhood on the north, west and east. 2. Southerly: Undeveloped property planned RL, low density residential, Code Requirements Section 36 -69 "Every building designed. and erected in an R -1 Residence District for the housing of one family, together with its accessory buildings, shall be located on a building site of not less than 10,000 square feet in area. The minimum width of the lot shall not be less than 75 feet at the building setback line. No existing lot shall be subdivided unless all the resultin g lots comply in size with the provision hereof." Section 30 -8 (f) (1) (a) "The minimum lot dimensions to subdivide in an F or R -1 zone shall be: 1. 75 feet wide at the established building setback line; 3. Not less than 10,000 square feet in area." Section 30-8 (f) (5 ) "Side lines of lots shall be substantially at right angles or radial to the street line." Statutory Requirements Section 367910 Subdivision 6 (2) of the state law requires that the followifig findings be made before a variance can be granted: Z a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the.property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. kd Attachments 10 Location Map 210 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Applicant's Proposal 4. Alternative Two (Staff Proposal) 50 Resolution 0 19 o BEAM A 609 X .: �� J; ... ,�,,.... 22 W Geraroia:: I roh /Mm Lake KOHLMAN d AV Q YJ CO RD n C " W � � 23 `u . J aft C y W C - � PALM d ° W ..... >' CR U pv W �- C�T R G R --4 DE- MON'� AV p O 22 Q k. 60 < <� l 12 GER AIS AV �- GRANDVIEW : _ m VIKIN0 58 N AV COPE �,. CT COPE AV ....:... e/%r La *e K �p LARK AV F- .::::.:: G �., N ARK RD y Q, ..:. rn Q / CO o RD a LAURI �-- H ° Q N ,�Q' Q,• Q 25 LELANO RD 25 n SAND- H URST m y J C CO a RD .11 18 11 } z o JU NCTION ST I � ELDRI AV ° ,1 � (f) CHAMBERS ST F- P (I) AV Cr ° E AV CMr CC _j �1 OAE 4i N °° ELDRIDG E AV Q Oehr /��e ao ar � T co Lake NT a � = co A kN AV N E RGE AV F. S KI W Y SKILLMAN ? AV ILLMAN AV W KNW o A O ac 3 LA W RY � RY- AV U a N � MT V RNON ERNON AV Z 26 W AV 26 �. �- 26 a -' o � g y FROST F / F- N V y BELLW000 AV BELo 000 NW gp 2T H � _ ac o o W FE ON AV C ° 3 ° �� y . Q W to ace LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment 1 4 N VADNA HEIGHTS 19 s ......... CS E v r S 19 o BEAM A 609 X .: �� J; ... ,�,,.... 22 W Geraroia:: I roh /Mm Lake KOHLMAN d AV Q YJ CO RD n C " W � � 23 `u . J aft C y W C - � PALM d ° W ..... >' CR U pv W �- C�T R G R --4 DE- MON'� AV p O 22 Q k. 60 < <� l 12 GER AIS AV �- GRANDVIEW : _ m VIKIN0 58 N AV COPE �,. CT COPE AV ....:... e/%r La *e K �p LARK AV F- .::::.:: G �., N ARK RD y Q, ..:. rn Q / CO o RD a LAURI �-- H ° Q N ,�Q' Q,• Q 25 LELANO RD 25 n SAND- H URST m y J C CO a RD .11 18 11 } z o JU NCTION ST I � ELDRI AV ° ,1 � (f) CHAMBERS ST F- P (I) AV Cr ° E AV CMr CC _j �1 OAE 4i N °° ELDRIDG E AV Q Oehr /��e ao ar � T co Lake NT a � = co A kN AV N E RGE AV F. S KI W Y SKILLMAN ? AV ILLMAN AV W KNW o A O ac 3 LA W RY � RY- AV U a N � MT V RNON ERNON AV Z 26 W AV 26 �. �- 26 a -' o � g y FROST F / F- N V y BELLW000 AV BELo 000 NW gp 2T H � _ ac o o W FE ON AV C ° 3 ° �� y . Q W to ace LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment 1 4 N Oft. L 60) lX ` t A 11 k� s to X ONNOR i s A WE VOW is coot tAS � t b? 44 to 2 S 7B 7� t4Q is 14 o 13 4 12 (sj 3 9 IU 11 (H E0 7 7 3 DEMONra. cn I q a-�•' ° 8. ' 2 S 3 a� 7s 72 . 31. � ' �'• U. (4 CIC (AP) t4 (Ml • V o goo 436-15 S�. �,,; (,I 971 a s 7 $ _ 955 13 o AVF 2462 �p • BROOK3 I x 7 1 60 Under Construction 948 ' ' g s• e9 os• �, 38 • . Under Construction PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 4 N 4 cA o0 ono Q � 81 �Z N 11,111111111110000 1. 6% 4012 OC 1;7.4z -- Q =�1 o Q ~ 2C. o • r '.. FROND'.: 4 0 SETBACK. � LINE apo 2- fr rch • e 6 d r. PROPOSED i ; iro '�,,,!• o > LOT SPLIT s� . LOT 21 LOT 20 .. 85. A/8 .9 • 45•rr - 9 " E 75, 83 I11 •�S "59''� - .. LOT 21 Fxi sti ng Area-10,030 LOT 20 Pro Sq. Ft, Proposed Area— 8,975 S . Ft Existing Area– Sq. Ft q Proposed Area--11 • • 1, 2�0 Sq. Ft. SITE PLAN 'ALTERNATIVE ONE 4 N �y 00 1 � 4 0 o pp 00 0 1 lz 75 . 00 0 at = 4. 1 2 06 1 1 , 2C. N ( 0 7 . v o FRONT o SETBACK {' Z ,. o LINE • �• �p o • C v 2• S�ar fr a rr�C • y • v LOT SPLIT A M r cwh J � �►1• n - o v io oll i 21 LOT 20 LOT to � . ........ 0 o g5. Z1 n181 4SX5'9 +� .. ••- .... 75.89 n�e�'4s "59 "� ! • • LOT 21 LOT 20 Existing Area-10,030 sq . ft, Exis Area--10,225 sq . ft. Proposed Area -- 8,730 sq ft, Proposed Area - -11 =.525 sq , ft, T r ��r SITE P ALTERNATIVE TWO t 7 Attachment 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof , a regular meeting n g g of the City Council of the City of Maplewood.,. Minnesota was duly alled and held in the council chambers in said d city on the day of 1987 at 7 p.m. The following members -were p resent: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Dave Morris applied for a variance for the followin described property Lot 21, Block 4, Carsgrove Meadows First Addition WHEREAS, section 36 -69 and 30 -8 (f) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires single-dwelling ots to have g at least 10,000 square feet of lot area and 75 feet of lot width at the building setback line; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 8,730 square feet of lot area and 67.5 feet of lot width, requiring a variance of 1 270 s and 75 feet; square feet WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on July 6, 1987. The planning p ning commission recommended to the city council that said variance be . 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing n g , 1987 . to consider this variance. Notice thereof was ublished and d mailed pursuant to law. All persons p resent at said hearin g were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since the home to the west has a sideyard setback of approximately 20 feet. Therefore, a house on Lot 21 would not appear crowded, even though the lot width would be less than required. 20 The character and appearance of the neighborhood would be maintained. 3 0 0 " I f the lot split and variances were denied, Lot 21 could not be put "to reasonable use. 8 Attachment 5 Adopted this day of 1987. - Seconlded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS* CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk erk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that Y y t I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1987, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full,, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to these variances. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate t of p to seal of the city his day , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood D Page 4 Planning Commission minutes 8-17-87 D, variances and Lot Split: Brooks Court ' (Morris) Dave Morris of Granada da Home Builders, 5440 Hilltop ven p ue, Lake Elmo, discussed the proposed lotsplit and.variances with the commissioners. Commissioner Rossbach moved approval of the lot d i v i s i on and a • a 1 27 _ �_ adoption of the resolution approving 0 square foot. lot area variance and a 7. 5 - foot lot width variance for Lot • s that: 21. Appro is based on the findin g 1. The spirit and intent of the r ' side and o d � Hance would be met. since the y setback requirements could still be • satisf�ed. Z. The character and app earance • P of the neighborhood would be maintained, 3. If the lot split and variances • were denied, Lot 21 could not be Put to reasonable use. Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes -- Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola Fischer, Larson, Rossbach E. Preliminary Plat: �efferson 6th Additf` ion Kent Jefferson of Jeffers n Homes • 453 Highway 61, White Bear Lake discussed the project with the commis ioners ' mss . Commissioner Larson moved ap roval f the Jefferson 6th Addi ition � 1 ]owin preliminary plat, subject to he g conditions being satisfied before fina plat approval: 1. Recording of the Jefferso�F'fth Addition plat. 2. Submittal of a a develo 's a all p ublic i c P 9 ement for the construction of P improvements.. 3. Move the cul-de-sac ulb to minimum of 10 0 est to reduce lot seven to the 00 squa feet of area The south lot of line for Lot Two and the westerly t line ne for Lot Three through Five shall shifted to correspon with the a 1) be staff. a revi sed .lotting plan proposed by city Y 4. .City engineer approval of final • erosion grad � g, utility, � ty, dra i na a and control fans, g 5. Revise th name of the cul-de-sac " �� "Lakewood �� sac from akewood Drive to Co t , .= Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes - -6a rett, Cardinal, Fiola Larson, R ssbach Nay -- Fischer T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Aotlon by Cour NDUM Endorsed dr.. Modi.� i ed ...... _,.Y�...,�.... }.� Red eoted,� Date -- Johnso " and Alley and Street Vacations Stanich Court Companies SUMMARY of a preliminary plat for 36 three streets and two alley Introduction The applicant is requesting approval single- dwelling lots and vacation of rights -of -way. (See page 11.) Discussion - Issues to be Resolved 1. Storm Sewer: The applicant is proposing to temporarily pond water on this site (Lots 8 and 9, Block 2) to restrict runoff to the predevelopment rate. Once the downstream storm sewer system is constructed, this pond would be eliminated. The city of North St. Paul, however, wants a permanent down- stream storm sewer system constructed before this site is developed. They believe that there is potential financial exposure to their community if the storm sewer is not constructed at the time of development. They are also not convinced the existing ditches along County Road B are adequate to handle the runoff from this site. 20 Sanitary Sewer: The sewer plan anticipates that the westerly portion of this site will be served by the existing sewer in County Road B, at German Street (page 13). However, the applicant has determined that this sewer is located at too high of an elevation to serve the easterly two- thirds of his site. He is, therefore, requesting a sewer plan amendment to connect to North St. Paul's system. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) must determine that there is adequate capacity in the regional interceptor line that outlets the North St. Paul sewer. Construction plans are needed for this determination. These plans will not be drawn until the applicant is reasonably assured that this plat will be approved. A capacity problem is not anticipated. The city engineer will be recommending approval of the sewer plan amendment once the MWCC d$termines adequate capacity exists. MEMORA City Manager Associate Planner Preliminary Plat County Road B and Sherman Boosalis Parkway Terrace August 27, 1987 Recommendation I . Approve the resolution on page 14 to vacate the existing street and alley right -of -ways that cross this site. Approval is on the basis that: 1. The street and alley right -of -ways are not needed. 20 The proposed street alignment would preserve more desirable mature trees.than would otherwise be possible. 3. Construction of the east /west Sandhurst Avenue right -of -way would require additional driveways onto County Road B. The proposed north /south right -of -way alignment would reduce or totally eliminate this undesirable situation. II. Approve the Parkway Terrace preliminary plat (plans stamped 8 -12- 87) , subject to satisfying the following conditions before final plat approval: 10 Public improvements must be guaranteed for Lots 9 -16, Block 1 and Blocks 2 and 3 or they must be platted as an outlot. 2. Approval of a sewer plan amendment and obtain a commitment from North St. Paul to allow the lots east of those fronting on German Street to be served by North St. Paul water and sanitary sewer. 30 Construction of a permanent storm sewer outlet must be guaranteed. The proposed temporary ponding shall not be permitted unless found to be acceptable by North St. Paul. The design specifications must be approved by the city engineer, Ramsey County and North St. Paul. If permanent, on -site ponding will be constructed, the plat shall include an outlot which includes one foot of elevation above the 100 -year storm design. The outlot shall be dedicated to the public for drainage and storm water ponding. If a temporary pond will be permitted by North St. Paul, a recordable drainage easement shall be submitted to the Maplewood city engineer for approval and recording. The applicant shall also pay the recording fees. Any lot (s) that will adjoin a temporary or permanent pond shall have at least 10,000 square feet outside of the easement. 4. City engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. The grading plan shall indicate the number, location and type of four - inch - and - larger- diameter healthy trees to be retained. These trees shall be identified for retention on the site. Evidence of North St. Paul's approval of the construction plans that affect them shall be provided. 5 The center line of Stanich Street shall be moved west to line up with the center line of Stanich Court. All lots must comply with minimum lot requirements. 2 60 Submittal of a temporary easement for a 101 -foot cul -de -sac bulb for the end of Stanich Street, if homes will be occupied before the construction of Ariel Street is guaranteed, 7. No lot that would front only on Ariel Street shall be platted until the construction of Ariel Street is guaranteed., 8. The east /west portion of proposed "Stanich Curve" shall be changed to "Laurie Lane" or such other name acceptable to the director of public. safety. 9. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement and required surety to guarantee, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Construction of all required on -site public improvements, b. Repair of the service trenches, cut into German Street, c. Planting of trees. At least 92 mature trees must be growing on the site when construction is completed. Trees shown on the final grading plan to be retained shall be credited . toward the total number required. 10, Deed restrictions shall be recorded with the lots abutting County Road B stating that driveways will not be allowed on County Road B without city approval. 3 CITIZEN COMMENTS Forty -eight persons who own property within 350 feet of this site were asked their opinion of the proposal on page 12. Since that time the applicant has withdrawn the initial proposal and requested approval q Pp of the plan on page 11. The first request was withdrawn because of title problems-with the part of the plat in North St. Paul. Nearly all of .the comments below also apply to the revised proposal. Of the 19 respondents, nine were in favor, seven were opposed and three ' PP said i d they are neutral, but added that they would like as many of the trees as possible saved along County Road B. Staff Comment: The proposed tree plan shows that some trees w i l l be saved near Count Road B and German Street. The remainder of Y the trees along County Road B will be lost to road construction or, if allowed, temporar P Y storm water pond. The developer will, however, be required to plant replacement trees. Respondents in favor of the proposal listed the following comments: 1. It seems development has already begun (house at corner of Count Road B and ), why ask my opinion. German Street Y ? Staff Comment : A building permit was issued for an existing "lot -of- record ". The city cannot deny a permit when the lot and ro osed use comply p p p y with city code. The proposed plat consists of four "lots -of- record" that have improved street access. Construction of more than four homes would require city subdivision approval. 2. I want Lark Street vacated, as proposed, between German and Ariel Streets, 3. There are less roads with this proposal (than if the existing right -of -way were to be constructed), 4. Traffic congestion and speeding,will become worse p roblems, Staff Comment: County Road B is designated as a major collector street. The Ramsey County highway engineer states that this s roadway is designed to safely handle an average of 7,000 cars each day. The present average count is 4,600. This development will increase the count to between 4,726 and 4,744 assuming . ' 6 g 5 to 4 vehicle trips per day for each of the 36 proposed homes. This would be well within the P design specifications for this road. The public safety director has stated that he will have radar set up to investigate this concern. If it is shown to be a problem, it will be targeted for radar surveillance. 5. "German Street" should be renamed before this property s to eliminate the long-standing develops -stand in confusion " p 9 g ion between German and "Derma i-fi" streets. 4 Staff Comment: Street names can be changed by city council resolution. Staff is surveying the effected owners to determine if there are any objections to changing the' name to Luella Street . Those opposed raised the following concerns: 10 . " We object to the narrow lots along the east side of German Street. All of the lots on the west side of German Street are 100 feet wide and have a sense of openness. The proposed 75- foot -wide lots would give a crowded effect." Staf f Comment: Three of the six lots on the west side of German Street are 100 to 107 -feet wide. The other three lots ( south of Craig Place) are 80 to 89 -feet wide. The applicant's lots are minimum required by city code. The city does not have the authority to require wider lots. 20 "Something has to be done to keep the speeding cars of f of the street. If Maplewood wants to make this area residential, then make it safe for us to cross County Road B without fear for ourlives. The majority of the cars drive at least 45 to 50 miles per hour. With development, the level of traffic will increase tremendously. We are sure that Maplewood could make money on these speeders." Staff Comment : Refer to comment four under those in favor, 3. "It is too bad that we cannot keep some open space for wildlife and park in the city of ours. We have seen all of the open space in this area slowly being taken over - our neighbor's land was condemned to make room for Maplewood public works. Go ahead and build up the entire area--it just means more tax dollars for all of the politicians, etc. Why don't you use some of those new funds to increase traffic control in the area and maybe save some lives in the process." Staff Comment: This area is included in a "neighborhood park" search area. The parks and planning commissions, however, have determined that an additional park in this area is not needed. Unless this site is purchased by the city or county for park and open space, the owner must be allowed to develop it for single- dwelling use as it is planned and zoned. 4. I am concerned that the single dwellings will be changed to multiple dwellings, which would devalue my property. Staff Comment: This property is planned and zoned for single dwelling use. Any change requires a public hearing and city council approval. No such change is proposed. 5. "I am opposed to any assessment to the current (area) property owners." (2197 German Street) Staff Comment: The developer will pay the cost of all improvements, except for possibly a portion of Ariel Street which may be assessed to the owner in North St. Paul. No property owner in Maplewood will be assessed for the proposed development. 5 REFERENCE Site Description Gross area: 11.66 acres Existing land use: 'a single dwelling (under construction) Easements: Undeveloped right -of -way running east /west through the site for three streets and two alleys. (Refer to the ma on a P page Surrounding Land Uses North: The north half of undeveloped - Lark Avenue right-of-way and a single dwelling on a large lot (2230 German Street),, East: Unimproved Ariel Street right -of -way. Abutting to the east are two large parcels located in North St. Paul - -a 3.5 acre parcel zoned for single - dwelling use and an 8.8 -acre P arcel zoned for multiple- dwelling use. A single dwelling is located on the 8.8 -acre parcel. North St. Paul will be considering a petition to rezone this parcel for single - dwelling use. South County Road Be Across the street are single dwellings, West: German Street and a single dwelling on a large parcel 2236 German Street), Past Actions On August 17, 1987, the planning commission concurred with the P ark commission's recommendation to delete this area from a "neighborhood park" search area. Environmental Summary About 25 percent of this site i s wooded, according to the applicant's data, with mature trees (four inches or greater in trunk diameter). } There are approximately 365 mature trees. The predominant species are poplar (29%), black locust (22%), and oak (20%). Other species include basswood, boxelder and willow trees. Nearly all of the oak and basswood trees are located along the existing Ariel Street and the proposed Stanich Street s. ri ht -of -wa g Y Environmental Regulations 1. Section 9 -191 ( 5 ) (b) of the Environmental Protection Ordinance states: "If trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise the density above ten (10) trees per acre, unless part of a required planting screen. Any trees required to be planted shall be varied 'in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not include any species under disease epidemic and shall be hardy under local conditions. Tree diameters shall be at least two (2) inches." 6 (Comment: A total of 92 desirable trees must be located on site wh en construction is complete.) 29 Construction of Stanich Street would save more trees than if Sandhurst, Laurie and Lark Avenues were to be constructed as platted. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: R -1, residential low density. This entire site is also within a neighborhood park search area. P See past actions.) t 2. Zoning: R -1, single dwelling 3. Planned density: 14 people /net acre 49 Proposed density: 15.9 people /net acre under the current density conversion chart and 13.2 people /net acre under the revised chart that is being held up pending completion of the city's sewer plan, (Single- dwelling developments may exceed the planned density, provided. each lot complies with minimum lot area requirements. In this case at least 10,000 square feet are required. An average of 11,167 square feet is proposed.) Public Works 1. Section 29 -179 of the city code states: "Any borderline streets or portions thereof, which are newly constructed, shall be constructed by the city from which the request for construction emanates. This provision is intended to mean that, if, because of a development in one or the other of the two ( 2 ) municipalities to which this article pertains, it becomes necessary to construct a portion of a borderline street, that portion of the borderline street shall be constructed and maintained by the municipality in which the development requesting the Said- construction is taking place; provided, however, that at the request of either municipality, this matter shall be subject to review and reconsideration so that the portions of borderline streets required to be maintained by the respective municipalities shall be kept fairly equal in number of total lineal feet maintained by each. (Comment: The North St. Paul city manager has agreed to maintain Ariel Street. City Council approval is required.) 2. Storm sewer from this site should be routed east to North St. Paul along County Road B. The city engineer doubts that there is adequate capacity in the Maplewood system to the south, unless supplemented by permanent ponding on the applicant's site. If, however, connection to the Maplewood system is chosen, it should be routed south along the unimproved Ariel Street right -of -way. Routing along Stanich Court should not be considered, because the street would have to be torn up. These repairs would lead to future maintenance problems. 7 30 This site was assessed for a Maplewood water tower improvement. However, the applicant has determined that the cost of looping, if connected to Maplewood's system,.would be significantly more expensive than connecting to North St Paul's system. North St. Paul would own and maintain the 'water main in proposed - Stanich Street, but the street would be maintained by Maplewood. This situation is a common occurrence throughout the northeasterly portion of the city, in particular the Tilsen subdivisions. North St. Paul's manager has agreed to the proposal. 40 There are no utilities within or planned to be' located within the alley and street right -of -ways to be vacated. North St. Pau 1 The applicant originally requested approval from North St. Paul and Maplewood for the plan on page 12. This proposal required North St. Paul's approval to transfer some property to the City of Maplewood and to vacate the east one -half of Ariel Street. Due to title problems with the parcel in North St..Paul, North St. Paul's attorney has recommended that no council action (vacation, detachment or rezoning . from multiple to single dwelling) be taken until the law suit is settled. The applicant does not believe that this issue will be resolved this year, so he withdrew that proposal. The revised proposal to construct Ariel Street is acceptable to the principal owner of the North St. Paul parcel. j 1 Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Area Street Concept /Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat (8 1/2 x 11) 4. Withdrawn Preliminary Plat Proposal 5. Excerpt from the Drainage Plan 6. Resolution (vacations) 7. Preliminary Plat (separate enclosure) r • PUO ml R • W . � • F W F Q � J J c0 MI L jR c sc Ap ' •_ R 3 s e1F soft A VIE LOCATION MAP i i_ J �. MI* Y 111111ij All • t+ - - -- - - - - -- • Planned for �• • 3 , s t u ra°' is L •• t - All • - �•bl.. 8 � i �. ZIA ) Business Warehouse • Il 16 L� 18 19 20 5 27 29 .,. ,,, _. _ ! 29 _ [• �.. y , (4) (7) , 7.f - - 71 - U! 21) .v It ji A T �t L 7 j�:t 98� a&+&C J / • V I I to a to 40 317 C3 ,•• r• , ; _ ..._. ' 1 15 t4 IgI 12 11 10 9 7 - ' 1 3 i 15 s r3 12 i Water - Tower r _ f - - - - r .G�ae. _ M 71 16 11 1819 20 2 3 2 - • -� _ 4e �r� • ' + . —3 Cope Avenues ___ .�.,�,�:.«� Un Street ■.`�st C (3t) r , � t o•� I OIL �` ..•` f `` !' -• e Os • x Z? - A 98 r 33 O �. 2 U CX[ 2: s . r � � 9 � •• � • 4 � _w II _ -.- . •. • rj4•: • : • �"• 7�V � r � �`� ro �lj" 15 V r %� •. • s � r +y :•�•�•� - Ij'. • • •te r• :: �i • , �/+ � LJ , I \ • • • • ri r ��. y fir..•. r C� fr � 0 y 'V _• ICY• � �:�i ♦ ♦ •; • ;•••: : �fi i• � � � � . 4 1 .•fir /"`"'� ;r :•.: •: ••: ••.•y�• � t ••.♦ •♦:r•• ••••• • • r il p. 34 • :•:• :•• ; •••••• 96_ T' 0 4�) 1 , ; .fir ••};.v ;:.�• . ♦�I; .; •: •:; .;;.; , �. 4� , e rr r ;•::::;� . •••::• :: r. ;.•:::.•. .• ::..:. North St. Paul r CC Id 4n in JAIN eUN •�'�� I J t � : r:U••:•: • •;• f :• :: rte• i�• • :• :.• •%; •�••� r r•; ti «i t t � } t 1 • : : : ::: • �� - • i • :4.1.9 : : • •• •!�•• ••• • • ti : • • ••♦♦•: • •••• •• � —` • r� ✓:ti •; hjr ::rr: •♦tiV :: ••• • • : •Y:•w• ': •i : :.ter • • � � ! � i • 011 _ � is i :• • , �..• ` . '' � • � � � � ' " � • •: • r • •; : •�•• �; � mss ' :: • • • • i r rf �,. � • � N A - � y c ) i O V t U •r C • �d 4J t/7 AREA STREET CONCEPT MAP f: Applicant's Site 10 Attachment 2 2256 ' ` 2236 0 cis A i 2230 ? ,f •---- �, � ' • . / � 1 \ .. .S 411 I . is 1 . _ ., _ •' �; �,. a f _. � y \ Q ! 1 Y W f N _. 12 r Z W= t Cr Cr. a. rt J — �p Qi t � ssl � ost w o + I g :N I 3 in ti ++ s.. , • •= zo ` 3_ Div ` I1 N f� J -r 1. I osl In fn 1 ge al ; , � emporary . Storm Water Pond Q ►II t • f _ ts �• avow A '}- Z N l8 la Cc 1 t 'o is 98i8 '3 8 PARKWAY TERRACE PRELIMINARY PLAT Alley and Street Right —of =Way to be Vacated 11 Attachment 3 4 N s; SSI se I { ti I •• t 7i z INS dI.. :.:• Y .... .......�.••• •:. IX If cc co lop SL CD .. . ...:... .. . ... ..... .. •••• S: : •••• ••• :: :• •i :: i ••: 133 _ _ .. ; • :. :•:: :.. ::• i•: 0/ Ir MNVS cJ tY b . •....; • :• :;.•::. ❖r::•�� r o •:•: `ti$ :•:•:•:•:•: �.• S o 4" . 4•r r ,t fr •. .�. 0 q , r � oo� � r ..•� -� -.•. �. � -- -� - ice.}..► . aboa.^_f — — k.tNno3 - ---_ ____ --_ t �zcc `' `o �► s:f 9a 8NN38 ':D 'J Withdrawn 8 -14 -87 Right —of —Way to be Preliminary Plat Pr vacated y P z•r. • Area proposed to be annexed from (Sent to Neighbors) the City , of North St Paul r.• 12 Attachment 4 _ 1 • fit• H I T B E A K � a .- Golf Course • --.- O WNITF fiFAP •i� • PQ(•a S 7 • • • • • •� it •..7fr J �. • •1• • . .....•.. ...._ . .:.•:i: _w_�� �_� :�:...• .. - . - •• __i.. �.•. .. •. ...• • ��_•.�: "1•:�y.'a`._. - . - ._ �. a . • 1 _ • • Q� {t k P �" - - •.M.._ i ! BE i .r .• A ✓F 11► :iL ii3L+.,• .Z • •`SC _�j.. . ' • 4 (� 4i- • 1 ` � • , '' ._'-"r• . rai•ii�ii••. �. � ! Rte• • : • vrd�t'1 P. �•._�_ , -.tom a • � • _.- ___--- .'�''nf � ',��"'. /'- ;` - / � • /t '-`' • _ .. ■ �(ISCb ner Lake _ Park ^� L oh S. T' -- a /� • i s • �'7 ' fi " :. - fir- J r— -o - 77- " � g • i • • '( • ::•� .: ::_• • i• 'i: • • • ' �)� 4 rf . : �v!)CL!' .t f' .or :+chi • f i / r •.:• • •�'• «.• •.:� • - 11 t - _:� .ary O AVf. „i. •• , 'i• �'� •::• ^ ; � • i ce • _._._ -.--- ; � •: • • • • • �• • ..fir • :• .,• •: M T Aa 803 •+— ..... Al i••• •• •i ts •;• • `a, .�,�. �3 r M Oil El l....��� �• •:i •—• • --- �R • Wimp XI it • A ; --� .� - • • '/ • •"• L. /tom '! _ —. 4. if z; hh •• ••• • •N••1: L • • •• ��. ' • • Hi ghway 36* - .. - Z EI i 4 " •• 1 / '' SL' , '� !'1 = tom •t _ if • • • " • •� • i :� c f 0 . • :.=:::Count y Ro B 4 -:ate •.•■ , • •• • :•r••••: i t • .r., • N•, • s !rN • 1'£ ? �; •:: `. ft � •• '• Q • �:` i •i '••• • • • .. , � iEL�_ � � �. r • •. • • . ••• w► 3• �(!rC!!1` � • • a 0 It Is ,'• ••• .1 - • ■ --� 1 j • 1 sa• w •!.�•' �. • •• '�_�'' �!at2r Tank • • {r? CIO _ :•• a • - 1 a �•�/.�� • ' 1 N • iiiwN ■■N••� .v,� • :� • • • i ;y !! :i is !_ 1 ' � , . • •••ii• it •� r . - 0 .1 �� ��. % �i `��i • � :4'rhrirr :'� ••w• • w� y • i? AL : 'y � v i1 7 li ,:. t ti'n.• f ` ry Gi:ds ne ` v Us r / r:'y }l4;RlQ _ 1 w • • •- •• _ .«� i�•• .N.• »• • - F • !age H all �•,.` E �� � - 1Li �� • � � y v , - • V • •• L C /�] • ' '• • It .i ; is V • • �i OJL � , a :' . tai • . Jr Ni �- � T • .. ur:g "i ':i .•• • AVE 1 6 • • • • • • � IN evE �y �,..y _.._.__ • a Tank • _ - -- - -- - to • • (' � -- - - \/ \) I; EL�iFttPi �'�j •. ..'! � \ .. ,(.: " v •• • , : • _ s�rC� 1'1pp muirraV. ��-- -' •".. •�. _ _ — Ac `_\ !r`_ ici` r�+ a�` v lt!liLl \.- 1��,'a- .r�..`,..,■•r. _ a� '� S• s - . — lR.�• •- `� Jl� � _ • .��y��� . +• ���. �.i. fir• • • • • a : /� :"•`_� t s •ai • � < •,. :r% � ,� pa�r'N rE • • .`t^^.: 4 yE x\X e.• ; • 4 116T io t • . • t �o _r 'e I Par`s 10-. - � ._ . - i 'r r• Y f ? • -'• . -, .. = - -� � _ A4j - V y t4 - A. I s its . '_ -- - _. • Sri `1. �� /- `? .• � 1 ' • Fi�t•�rr• Flrr�tht - -. _.. .. rt; � I t �.. •' _*. ...__.- r- m ft 04 EXCERPT FROM THE t SEWER PLAN 13 Attachment 5 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of 1987 at 7 p.m. , The following members were present: The following members were absent: .WHEREAS, Sherman Boosalis Companies initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest i,n the following described properties: p Alley right -of -ways in Blocks 17 and 32, and the following treet right -of -ways: Laurie Road Sandhurst A g ' venue, and Lark Avenue between Ariel and German Streets, all in Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said alley s have signed g y and street right-of-ways g ed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed b the planning Y P g commission on August 31, 1987. The planning commission recommended to the city council that this vacation be 3. The city council held a public hearing on September 14 p , 1987 to consider this vacation. Notice tice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present.at this hearing ere given a g g n opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The e council also considered reports and recommendations of the city y staff and Planning commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described alley nd street right-of-ways, Y • public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lot Two, Block One, and Lots One and Two, Blocks 16 17 an Taylor's Addition d 32, Smith and Ta Y to North St. Paul, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City ouncil that the public interest to ran Y t it is in • grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: le The street and alley right-of-ways are not needed. 2. The proposed street alignment would preserve more desirable mature,. , trees than would otherwise be possible. 14 Attachment 6 3. Construction of the east /west Sandhurst Avenue right-of-way would require additional driveways onto County Road B. The proposed north /south right -of -way alignment would reduce or totally eliminate this undesirable situation. Adopted this day of , 1987* Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a ,regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1987 with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of said alley and said right -of -ways. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1987. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 15 — 5 — Planning Commission Minutes 8 -31 -87 VI. VISITOR PRE NTATIONS VII. COMMUNICATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Alley Vacation: Between Fenton, alter and Gordon John Rawson, Jr., the plicant re esting the alley vacation, was present and requested t city re ve a diseased elm tree on the city's alley property. e comm'ssion suggested this matter be addressed to the city coup it f r their direction. Commissioner Sletten moved a royal of the resolution to vacate the alley right -of -way, subject retention of a ten - foot -wide utility easement along the north h f the east /west segment and the west ten feet of a portion of e no h /south segment. The basis for approval-is: 1. This right -of -way 's the result of obsolete platting hat occurred prior to the estab 1 i s m g• ent of the ci y. Maplewood � s policy has been to vacate alley righ s -of -way wheneve possible. 2. This alley does not serve as an acce to an of the a djoini ng y propert 3. The grade s uth of Fenton Avenue is to steep p o construct the alley. Commissioner igmundik seconded Ayes- Barret F' y t, Fischer, Rossbach, Si gmu.n i k, S1 etten B. Preliminary Plat, Alley and Street Vacations: Parkwa y Terrace Mario Cocchiarella, a partner in Sherman - Boosalis Companies, commented on the recommendations in the staff report concerning the storm sewer construction guarantee. A commissioner asked staff for North St. Paul's or past policy on escrow guarantees. Staff explained Maplewood's ast policy and reFerred Mr. Cocchi ar p ella to the Cit of North St. Paul for their policy. Commissioner Rossbach moved: I. Approval of the resolution to vacate the existing treet and alley that Gros g y rights-of-way s this s s i te. Approval i s on the basis that: 1. The street and alley rights -of -wa y are not needed. ,,.2. The proposed street alignment would preserve more desirable r mature trees than would otherwise be possible-, 3. Construction of the east /west Sandhurst Avenue rig ht-of- way 9 y would require additional driveways onto County Road proposed .B. The rig ht-of-way • north /south alignment would reduce or totally eliminate this undesirable situation. Pl anning Commission - 6 Minutes 8 -31 -87 He Approval of the Parkway Terrace prel plat, subject to satisfying the following conditions . ons before final plat approval: 1. Public improvements must be guaranteed for-Lots 9 -16, Block 1 s and Blocks 2 and 3 or they must be platted as an outlot. 2. Approval of a sewer plan amendment and obtain a commitment from North St. Paul to allow the lots east of those fronting on German Street to be served b N orth y o th St. Paul water and sanitary sewer, 3. Construction of a permanent storm sewer outlet must be guaranteed. The proposed t emporary ponding shall not be ermitted nless found to be acceptable p b e by North St. Paul. The design . spe c-i f icati ons must be approved by the city engineer, neer, Ramse County, and North St. Paul, g y If permanent, on -site pondi ng wi be constructed, the 1 at shall include an outlot which P i ch i nc1 udes one foot of elevation on above the 1.00 -year storm design. The outlot shall be dedicated to the public for drainage and storm water pondi ng. If a temporary pond will be permitted by North St. Paul, a recordable drainage easement shall be submitted to the Maplewood city engineer for approval and recording. The ap i cant h pp s also pay the recording fees. Any l ot(s) that will adj a temporary or permanent pond shall have at least 10,000 square feet outside of the easement. 4. City engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control fans T • p he grading plan shall indicate the number, location and type of four inch - and - larger- diameter healthy trees to be retained. These tree n s shall be identified for retention on the site. Evidence of North St. Paul's approval 1 of the construction ' P uct�on plans that affect them shall be provided. 5. The center line of Stanich Street shall be moved west to line up with the center line of Stanich Court. All lots must comply ply mini mum lot requirements. 6. Submittal . of a temporary easement for a 100 -foot cul-de-sac b u l b for the end of Stanich Street, if homes will be occupied r� el Street i s guaranteed before the construction of A . 7. No lot that would front only on Ari e l Street s h a l l be 1 atted el Street �s guaranteed until the construction of Ari P . 8. The east /west portion of proposed "Stanich Curve" shall be changed to "Laurie Lane" or such other name acceptable to the director of p ublic safety. P Planning Commission Minutes 8- 31 -8.7 _7_ 9. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement an required P 9 d eq u i red- .surety to guarantee, but be limited to, the following items: an Construction of all required on —site ubli q p c, improvements, b. Repair of the service trenches, cut into German Street c. Planting of trees. At least 92 mature trees must be growing on the site when construction is completed. Trees shown on the final grading plan to be retained shall be credited toward t h o total number required. 10. Deed restrictions shall be recorded with the lots abutting g County Road B stating that driveways will . not be allowed on Count y d Roa B without city approval. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Barrett, ' y Barrett, Fischer, Rossbach, Si gmundi k, Sletten IX. UNFI ISHED BUSI SS X. COMMI ION PR ENTATIONS A. Co 01 Meeting: August 24, 1987 XI. STAFF PRE S TATIONS A. Coun it eting-- September 14, 1987: Ralph Sletten XII. ADJOU MENT Meet n ad 'ourne at 9 :38 . 9 J p.m. ter' 40 r AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director SUBJECT: Award of Bids --Long-Term Disabil Insurance DATE: September 2, 1987 Agenda Number --,/ .Action br c o unci3 Endorsed Mod.ifi ec ,„--�- ]Rej ecte Dat e I concur with the attached recommendation from the City's insurance consul nt that the bid be awarded to Schools Insurance Fund. A supplemental report on which of the six benefit options should be selected will be distributed b September 10th. y M A ^' rporate R k Managers, co s lnc. 7525 mitchell road • suite 109 • eden prairie, minnesota 55344 * (612) 937 -8942 August 27, 1987 Mr..Daniel Faust Finance Director Maplewood City Hall 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Long Term Disability Bid Proposals Dear Dan: Enclosed is a bid tabulation sheet outlining the bids received by the City for its Long Term Disability program. All proposals have been converted to a premium rate per $100 of benefit for easy comparison. The incumbent carrier, Canada Life, has submitted a bid 6.5% higher than the present rate. This is probably due to the existence of an active claim and anticipated future costs. All provisions of the Canada Life policy remain unchanged. The lowest bid was submitted by Equicor and is underwritten by Equitable Life. I have verified the rate structure with the company and-they are very low for a group with Police Officers and Street Maintenance. There are some differences between the Equicor and Canada Life, with the advantage being n the latter's g favor. For example, Equicor will provide rehabilitative benefits for only a maximum 12 month period whereas Canada Life will-go to 24 months. The Canada Life plan does not exclude coverage for pre - existing conditions for new hires. Equicor does have such an exclusion and requires 12 months of coverage before benefits become payable. With respect to payment of claims, Equicor does make a presumption that a claimant will be eligible for Social Security disability benefits (and probably also for PERA) and deducts that amount, as calculated from tables, from their LTD benefit payment. This "presumption" is made even though the employee may not have filed for Social Security and /or PERA. The end result could be that an employee could have a significantly reduced income even though Social Security or PERA benefits may not be actually received. There is a possibility that this situation could be avoided through a reimbursement agreement nego- tiated between the City and Equicor. However, this would commit the City to reimbursement to Equicor if overpaid LTD benefits could not, for any reason, be recovered from the employee or family. Equicor will, however, assist with the filing for other benefits and, if necessary, aid the claimant in the appeals process. Mr. Daniel Faust August 27, 1987 Page 2 a Based on Equicor's bid, it appears that the City ould save approximately annually Life's PP y $ ually over Canada Life s proposal. Premium rates are conditionally guaranteed for two years. The next lowest bid was submitted by the Schools Insurance Fund and underwritten by Madison National Life. This plan is equal to the. Canada Life and is actually somewhat better with respect to rehabilitative benefits because there is no time limit for payment. Also, it appears to be somewhat more flexible in the area of "eligibility" in that employees who work 600 or more hours ear er P Y can be automatically covered. Special arrangements can be made for those working less than 600 hours. SIF typically includes a cost -of- living adjustment in their plan. Because Canada Life does not have it, SIF did not include it in their proposal. This is, however, a negotiable item and might be obtainable at no additional premium cost. Madison National Life is not a Best highly g Y rated company., being only a C +. However, Schools Insurance Fund, as adminis- trator, seems to have been quite successful I have no problem with their program. The premium savings under this plan would be approximately $4,500. Mutual Benefit Life is slightly more expensive than SIF. However, there are three areas in which-they do not satisfy specifications, Employees must work 30 or more hours per week to be eligible for coverage. There is no survivors' benefit as -with Canada Life. Also, Mutual Benefit imposes a 24 month lifetime benefit limitation for nervous /mental and. chemical dependency conditions, when non - hospitalized. Canada Life.treats these conditions as any other illness. -AMEX Life has similar nervous /mental and chemical dependency limitations to Mutual Benefit. They also have a pre- existing conditions limitation and a one month waiting period for coverage for new hires. Premium rates are higher than the above carriers. Premium cost through the Group America proposal is significantly higher than Canada Life's new rates, so I see no value in serious consideration of that proposal. Summary and Conclusions Equicor, Equitable Life, presented the lowest bid which could yield substantial savings to the City. Technically, however, their plan is not the same as that which has existed for the past four years. Also, the presumption of Social Security /PERA benefits availability could create claim problems. For these reasons, I cannot recommend acceptance of the Equicor bid on price alone. The City would have to be agreeable to the non - conforming provisions of the plan, w Mr. Daniel Faust August 27, 1987 ' Page .3 Schools Insurance.Fund is the second lowest bidder and their lan does equate P Q with the existing program. If the City wishes to continue present contract provisions, save benefits levels and /or length of elimination P eriod, I recommend acceptance of this proposal, Other proposals are not satisfactory based on cost and in most cases non- - compliance with current plan provisions. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, CORP RATE RISK MANA RS , _ INC . ha les Je inek Benefits Manager Enclosure CJ /lb August 20, 1987 Premium rates are based on each $100 of benefit payable. Benefits payable are 60% of payroll to the maximum benefit shown above CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Long Term Disability Insurance Bid Tabulation Canada Ca nada Plan., Life L ) Li Equicor AMEX Equitable Life Gr out America Mutual Benefit Life Schools Ins. Fund 1. 180 Day Elimination Period $1,200 Maximum Benefit $1923 $1.31 $0.72 $1.08 $ 1.58 1 $ .03 $1.02 $19500 1.40 0.78 1.07 1952 1,03 1.02 $1,700 1050 0.83 1.03 1050 1.03 1.02 2, 90 Day Elimination Period , $1,200 Maximum Benefit 1962 0.84 1.38 1198 1.33 1.17 .$19500 1.97 0091 1.37 1997 9 1.33 1 x 17 $19700 2.05 0.95 1.37 1.95 1.33 1.17 Premium rates are based on each $100 of benefit payable. Benefits payable are 60% of payroll to the maximum benefit shown above AGENDA S u p p 1 e m e n t MEMOR.ANDUM. TO: FROM: SUBJECT. DATE: INTRODUCTION Cit Finance Director f. Award of Bids Lon Disabilit Insurance September 9 , 1987 Lon disabilit (L.T,D.) insurance bid specifications. re bids on s-ix different benefit opti-ons. This report contains detailed information on each option. State law re that g roup insurance contracts be bid. at .'least. on ev four y ears. To compl with this re bids . were * opened on Au 20th .for L.T.D. ins-urance. Bids were re on six benefit options in order to determine the cost of improvin benefits.' Currentl Canada Life has the contract for L.T.D. insurance and the a is Bob Martin and Associates. Benefit's are paid on total. disabi Ti ties caused by sickness or injur after a 6-month waitin period. The current benefit amount is, 60% of an emplo monthl compensa -to a maximum of $1,2000 This benefit rate has been in effect for the past four y ears.- A.surve of suburbs with a population o 10,000 indicates. that about half of the cities have a 6-month waitin period -and .half. have a 3-month waitin period, The majorit of the cities have benefits e to .60% of the monthl salar The monthl benefi ti maximum ran from $600 to no maximum. The avera maximum is $2,124. ALTERNATIVES The six benefit alternatives are as follows: Waitin Monthl Period Maxi,mum' In Da Benefit 1 180 $ 1,200 20 180 1,500 3, 180 1, 7 00 4. 90' 1,200 5. 90 1 6 * 90 1,700 G -/ Alternative one is the current benefit rate, r TO: Ci Manager RE: Award of Bids Se.tember 9, 1987 DISCUSS rnv - . L.T. D. Insurance A key factor in deciding on an alternative is the remi um cost. ' The ' p h following is the annual cost of each alternative for current full- employees: The above indicates that ; op-tfons 1, 2 and 4 are less than the current of i c y costs. p The first deci s -ion that .needs to be made is whether or not to change the waiting n riad. Current on � _ g g p e , . ly ly 21/ of the Ci ; s fu.11 time employees have enough s i ck leave (i.e 1040 hours) to cover a s i x -month wai ti ng peri oa However 50% of the employees have enough s ick l eave (.i.e., 520 hours) to cover a three -month wai ting period. Therefore, the waiting period should be decreased to three months to more adequately cover employee needs . This eliminates the first three alter- natives, all with -si -month wai tin g ,peri.ods , from further consideration. The remai ni three al ternatives involve different monthly enefit maximums. C u.r y rentl y 26% of the Cit s full - employees have monthl sal of l ess than $2,000 that woul not benefit from an increase in the monthly. maximum. The monthly maximum benefit is 60% of an employee monthly sal ary.) Thus i f the ma ximum benefit were increased, 74% of the City's full-time employees would benefi from the increase. Since. most ful employees would benefit i f .the monthly. maximum were increased, alternati five and six should be considered. Alternative six woul ra the mi nimum monthly benefit from $1,200 to $1,,700. Even after this increase the. maximum would still be 1 less than that at other cities in the survey cited earlier where - the average maximum was $2,124. However, alternative six would increase the annual cost by 18/, which is in excess of the budget. Alternative five would i ncrease the annual cost by 11% or approximately. $2,000, wh.i ch could be financed within the 1988 Budget, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council (1) award the L.T.D. insurance contract to the Schools Insurance Fund through Bob Martin and Associates, (2) revise the waiting period from six months to three months and (3) increase the maximum monthly benefit from $1,200 to $1,500. DFF:Inb Annual Alternative Cost 1 $ 15 , 33l 2 17 3 19,011 4 17,586 5 20,519 6 21,807 Current Policy: 18 The above indicates that ; op-tfons 1, 2 and 4 are less than the current of i c y costs. p The first deci s -ion that .needs to be made is whether or not to change the waiting n riad. Current on � _ g g p e , . ly ly 21/ of the Ci ; s fu.11 time employees have enough s i ck leave (i.e 1040 hours) to cover a s i x -month wai ti ng peri oa However 50% of the employees have enough s ick l eave (.i.e., 520 hours) to cover a three -month wai ting period. Therefore, the waiting period should be decreased to three months to more adequately cover employee needs . This eliminates the first three alter- natives, all with -si -month wai tin g ,peri.ods , from further consideration. The remai ni three al ternatives involve different monthly enefit maximums. C u.r y rentl y 26% of the Cit s full - employees have monthl sal of l ess than $2,000 that woul not benefit from an increase in the monthly. maximum. The monthly maximum benefit is 60% of an employee monthly sal ary.) Thus i f the ma ximum benefit were increased, 74% of the City's full-time employees would benefi from the increase. Since. most ful employees would benefit i f .the monthly. maximum were increased, alternati five and six should be considered. Alternative six woul ra the mi nimum monthly benefit from $1,200 to $1,,700. Even after this increase the. maximum would still be 1 less than that at other cities in the survey cited earlier where - the average maximum was $2,124. However, alternative six would increase the annual cost by 18/, which is in excess of the budget. Alternative five would i ncrease the annual cost by 11% or approximately. $2,000, wh.i ch could be financed within the 1988 Budget, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council (1) award the L.T.D. insurance contract to the Schools Insurance Fund through Bob Martin and Associates, (2) revise the waiting period from six months to three months and (3) increase the maximum monthly benefit from $1,200 to $1,500. DFF:Inb ORDINANCE N0. �/ • AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE I OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO ISSUE CITATIONS FOR CODE VIOLATIONS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1 -26. Issuance of Ordinance Violations Summonses. The persons hereafter named, as employees or agents of the City of Maplewood, shall have power to issue summonses with complaints incorporated therein (citations), in the form adopted by rule of the District Court, but such issuance by those named shall relate only to offenses involving the City Code; building construction, operation or maintenance; fire and fire preven- tion; publ i c health and sanitation; animal control; and zoning. No such employee or agent hereinafter authorized to issue said summonses shall be authorized to arrest or otherwise taken a violator into custody or to secure a promise to appear in court in lieu of arrest. Those authorized are as follows: Fire Marshal and Deputy Fire Marshal Director of Public Works Code Enforcement Officer Building Inspector Plumbing Inspector Reserve Police Officers Community Service Officers Environmental Health Officer Animal Control Officer Other employees or agents of the City of Maplewood specifically designated in writing by the City Manager shall also have such authority. Nothing herein shall l i m i t the Minnesota Pe-O.S.T. Board licensed Maplewood Cit y Police Officers from performing their sworn duties. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of 19 . Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes - Nays - AGENDA #_' —A MEMORANDUM TO Ma and Cit Counci I FROM: C it y Ma n a g e r RE: Or Garba Collect* ion DATE. Au 25, 1987 Action b Council Endorsed-..... Modified -.... Rejected..... Date At the City Council meetin of A 1987, City staff was directed b Coonci-1member Anderson to draft an ordinance on organized g arba g e col lection The proposal for are 11 ord inance is included as Attachment A. Please note that .a certain se of events and time frame must be.followed as re b th.e State West Ma,na t of 1980 (Attachment C) .... This procedure must be followed prior to the Council en.actin an ordinance, Attachment B i s a proposed time table that the Council ma use to follow these state re The fl-rst step fn the procedure fs to order a publi- c hearin on organi.,zed,collectim, 1 recommend that a.public hearin date be set for�_.th,e re Council meetin g of October 12,-1987, I t ma be of interest to note that the Cit of New Hope h a publ i c hearin on or collection on August 24,, Champ-li n on Au st 25, and Cr has one.scheduled for September 150, MAM 1 n attachments PROPOSAL FOR AN ORDINANCE: ORGANIZED REFUSE COLLECTION Maplewood's current ordinance requires that each resident, .business or industry dispose of their solid in a sanitary manner. Most people within Maplewood use a licensed refuse collector to dispose of their solid waste. Although the refuse collector is licensed by the city, it is the responsibility of each person to contract with an individual hauler to collect his waste. According to 1987 Waste Management legislation, Ramsey County is authorized to. require its cities.to organize garbage collection. In 1988, the county will dec.i de if an ordinance making organized collection mandatory is necessary. At the present time, the county is providing technical assistance to cities to help them plan an efficient refuse collection system with economic incentives to residents for composting and recycling. In addition to providing technical assistance on organized collec— tion, Ramsey County is providing. funding for curbside recycling. In order to qualify for t h i s funding in 1988, the county grant guidelines require cities to investigate organized collection. Adopting a resolution of intent for an organized collection system, as prescribed by state law, would satisfy this guideline require— ment. The system of organized collection being considered by the city would continue with the existing private refuse haulers providing the service. The city would organize the entire community into districts or routes with an individual hauler being assigned a specific area. The hauler would provide service to all 1, 2 and 3 residential dwelling units within that area. Instead of each individual property contracting with the hauler for this service, the city would contract with and pay the haulers. Each resident would pay the city for the service. This organization would only apply to single family, duplex and triplex dwelling units. It would still be the responsibility of residents with greater than four units, businesses and industries to provide for thei=r own refuse collection. An organized system of refuse collection can most effectively be coordinated with the collection of recyclable materials and yard waste. If the city council makes a decision to adopt an. organized collection system, further study will be required on the type of service (curbside, bac k door, etc.) which would be provided. A PROPOSED TIME TABLE FOR ORGANIZED COLLECTION �. September 14, 1987 - -City Council Meeting. City staff submits a proposal on organi collection. Council sets a public heari date of October 12, 1987. Staff sends written notice to refuse,haulers at least two weeks before the ublic hearin 9, notifying them of the public hearing. 2. October 12, 1987--Publ Hearing Date. Council holds P ubl i c hearing on organized collection at their regular council meet— ing. Comments from the haulers and residents are presented, 3. October 26 1987 -- Resolution of Intent. The city ouncil m y pa a resolution of intent which instructs the city manager to contact all licensed residential refuse haulers, requesting that they, as a group, negotiate.a contract with a specified list of services .for organi collection. 4. January 25, 1988. The city must have waited the mandator y 90 days following the resolution of intent during which time the haulers and other concerned parties may submit written comments. The council then may act upon a final ordinance after this date. June 1987 8, 2 � •��y WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1980 AND RELATED ACTS AND LAWS As amended to date* Reprinted by: Legislative Commission on Waste Management Senator Gene Merriam, Chair Kim Austrian, Director Room 85), State Office 6ui ;ding St. Paul, Minnesota 5 515 5 ( 612) 297 - 3604 C *Underlined and. crossed -out portions are 1987 amendments from Chapters 348, 384, 404 and 1st Special Session Chapter 5. .y t, i preparing solid waste for reuse shall be exempt i �.mpt f rom one half the amount of the fee imposed by a count under this ' y section it there is at least an 85 percent volume reduction in the solid o waste processed. Before any fee is reduced, the verification procedures of section 473.843, subdivision 1, ara ra h mus t be followed and sub • P g c p ( � ' mi t ted to the appropr .i.ate county, 115A.921 [CITY OR TOWN FEE'AUTHORITY ] A city or town may eharge impo a fee, not to exceed 1-5 and of waste _ 2S cents per cubic Y or its equivalent, of se��e� -waste �ceeeptee - arid -d epesee�_ef on land; -te operators of facilities ' for the disposal of mixed municipal solid waste located within the .,.city or town. The revenue from the e fe�s sh$l} - ge must be credited to the city or town general fund and used only purposes of iandf il l abat for ement or for urposes of mitigating and compensating for the local risks, costs and other ther adverse effects of facilities, Waste residue from energy and resource recovery facilities at which solid waste is roc P essed for the purpose of extractin g, .reducing, converting to energy, or otherwise separating and preparing olid waste for r t from one- g reuse shall be exemp half the amount of the fee imposed by a city or town under this section if there is at least an 85 percent y volume reduction in the solid waste rocessed. Before ' P o e any fee is reduced, the verification procedures of section 473.843, subdivision 1, paragraph (c), must be followed and submitted to the appropriate city or town. [115A.94] [ORGANIZED COLLECTION.] Subdivision 1. [DEFINITION.] "Organized collection" a system for collecting solid waste on means in which a s ecified collector, or a member of an or anization of collectors, authorized to collect from a defined is eo ra hic service area or ..areas some or all of the solid waste that is released b generators for collection. Subd 2. [LOCAL.AUTHORITY.] A city or town ma y organ collection, after ublic notifica iz� t.ion as required in subdivision 4. A count may or anize collection as provided in ` ' 5 subdivision Subd. 3. [GENERAL PROVISIONS.] (a) The local over unit ma or anize collection a - 9 nment s a munic1 al service or b ordinance, franchise, license, ne otiated or bidd other means, using on ed contract, or e or more collectors or an organization of collectors, . (b) The local overnment unit ma not-establish administer orcianized col y or lection in a manner that impairs the preservation and development of recycling and markets-fo recyclable materials. The loca l overnm ent unit shall exem t recyclable from or aniz • ed collection upon a showing b the generator or collector that the materials ' are or will be 90 se arated from mixed municipal solid wa by the Qenerator, separateiv collected, and delivered for reuse in their on ' anal form or for use in a man ufacturin process, L(c) The local overnment unit may invite v i te and em to the ass �.s of interested ersons inch ' • ,• udin e rsons ope ratin g solid waste collection services in developin laps and ;roposals for or anized collection and or anized collection s in estab ishln the ystcm. (d) Organized collection accompl b municip service ma incl contract or as a ude a requirement that all or an p ortion of the solid waste exc ept ( recyclable materials and (2 ) materials that are rocessed at a resource recover f ' A&- at t he capacit in o eration at the time that the r acility e uirement is im osed, be delivered to a waste faci lit ed .... b the local overnment unit . In a list r ic.t or �- recover facilit has been cou11 where a resource deli nated b ordinance under section .� a 115A.86, or nized collection must conform to the re uirements of the desi nation ordinance. Subd. 4. [CITIES AND TOWNS; NOTICE• PL least 90 da s before � ANNING.] {a) At r oposin an ordinance, franchise, license contract or other means of or anizin colle town, b resolution o ction,.a cit or � the overnin, bod ,shall announce its intent to or anize collection and invi to the artici at.ion of interested ersons in lannin and est ' collections stem. abllshln the or anized (b) The resolution of intent must be ad • hearin The hearin m opted after a ublic ust be held at least two weeks after ublic notice and mailed notice to erso ns known b the cit or town to be o eratin solid waste collection or .town. The failure to 1V m services in the clt ailed notice to persons or defect in the notice does not invalidate the • o proceedin s, rovided a bona fide effort t com 1 with notice re uirements has been made . (c) During the 90 intent, and before ro the city or town shall plans or proposals for (d) Upon request, notice of subsequent p collection in the city d a . iod followin the resolution - of osin a method of or anizin collection, develo or su ervise the develo ment of or ani zed collect i.�.. p t he cit or town shall rovide mailed roceedin s on the or anization of or town. Subd. 5. [COUNTY ORGANIZED COLLECTION b ordinance re uire •] (a) A county may cities and towns within the count to organize collection. Or anized collectio ' counties may: n ordinances of (1) require ci ties and towns to re t ' • separate collection of r e the se arat.ion and ec clable materials; 91 j . MEMORANDUM Aotibn by C6Un Endorsed.... TO: City Manager Mod.iflecl.... . . FROM: Director of Community Development Rejecte SUBJECT: Power Lines Date DATE: September 9, 1987 Introduction The city council tabled the Maplewood Meadows plat to get more information on the health hazards of living adjacent to power lines. Background The most recent study on this subject is called Effects of Power Line Fields ". This was a five research program conducted over five years that the New York State Department of Health to stud electric and magnetic fields from power lines. conducted in Denver. "The Biological million dollar was administered by y the health hazards of The study was The most serious finding from this report suggests that children with leukemia and brain cancer are more likely to live in homes where there are elevated 60 -Hz magnetic field levels than are children who do not have cancer. Under similar circumstances as were found in Denver and assuming that magnetic fields can cause cancer, the findings of this report wo�u mean that ten to f percent of all childhood cancer cases are.`attributable to magnetic fields. Although much more research is needed before the question whether the magnetic fields actually cause or promote cancer can be resolved, the basis for such i an hypothesis s now established. At this time no risk assessments can be made because only four studies of this question have been made and the two which report an association are from the same geographic region. More research on cancer as a function of magnetic fields is needed, both in homes and for on- the -job exposure. (Refer to the non- technical summary and executive summaries of the New York study starting on page 3 . Also, refer to an article from "Health and Safety Report" on the New York study starting on page 13 . 60 -Hz magnetic fields are generated by home appliances as well as power lines. The chart on page 21 was taken from the New York study. Y It compares the relative strengths of magnetic fields from various sources. The chart on page 22 is from NSP and also compares relative magnetic field strengths. The chart on page 23 shows the readings g taken by NSP at the power line adjacent to the Maplewood Meadows plat. Note that the field- strengths of the power line are relatively low compared to most household appliances, The map on page 24 shows the distance between the proposed homes and the closest power line. The map on page 25 shows the remaining undeveloped land along the power line. . Discussion The New York study is too inconclusive • ive to take any action, particularly, considering the relatively ow field y strength of power lines compared to household appliances. Recommendation Approve the plat as previously.recommended. kd 2 MOM- EXCERPT FROM THE NEW YORK STUDY I. NON - TECHNICAL SUMMARY In our industrialized society everyone is exposed to 6.0 -Hz (50 -Hz in Europe) electric and magnetic fields which originate from electrical wiring, appliances and a variety of other conveniences of modern life. The New York State Power Lines Project was established to conduct research and to review the scientific literature to determine whether health hazards of these fields are possible. Particular attention was directed to the fields generated by 765 -kV overhead transmission lines. The research program, supported by contributions assessed from all New York State electric utilities, provided support to 16 different research groups studying human, "animal and isolated cell sensitivity to electric and magnetic fields. Most of the research studies reported no effects of concern. Of the few effects, some warrant further consideration. No e f f.e cts- -were_ _ found- -on -rep r oduot i-on -, - -- growth-- --or development-.-- _ S eve r a 1 - - - -s tud i-es- - showed no evidence of genetic or chromosomal damage that might lead to inherited effects or cause cancer. While most measurements of behavior and brain function did not demonstrate changes, some did show changes that were small but consistent. Some of these appear to result from changes in body rhythms, and might interfere with normal sleep patterns. There were also changes in pain responses and in the ability of rats to learn. A more serious concern comes from a study of cancer in children suggesting that children with leukemia and brain cancer are more likely to'live in homes where there are elevated 60 -Hz magnetic field levels than are children who do not have cancer. Although much more research is needed before the question whether the magnetic fields actually cause or promote cancer can be resolved, the basis for such an hypothesis is now established. At this time no risk assessments can be made because only four studies of this question have been made and the two which report an association are from the same geographic region. More research on cancer A as a function of magnetic fields is needed, both in homes and for on -the -job exposure. 3 Attachment 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Under a negotiated agreement between the New York State Public Service power Authority of the State of New York (now the New Con�nl. s s i on and the Pow y York Power Authority), a five million dollar research program - has been conducted over the pas y t five ears to determine whether there are health hazards associated with electric and magnetic fields produced by 60 -Hz power • fines. The project ransmission (especially 765 -kV) 1 has been administered P 7 by the New York State Department of Health. Scientific direction came from • identified priority a el of nine experts who identify p Y research areas, evaluated project applications, selected those to be funded, monitored the course of research and prepared this final report. Sixteen research projects were ' ' funded and completed, plus two extension projects solicited by the panel and after : performed at contract laboratories completion of the original projects. co nsiderable resources were allocated to construction of exposure facil and dosim y ( See etr Ap pendix 1), because a frequent problem in ppe previous work has been poor definition of the actual fields studied. 'n the dosimetr was provided by a contract from the US Assistance i Y Department of Energy, which was used to secure the services of experienced personnel from the A erospa ce Corp (now at W/L Associates) and the Po National Bureau of Standards. Detailed dosimetry was done at each exposure facility at leas beg inning t at the be innin and end of the study, and usually more frequently. The panel decided at the onset of the project to investigate and monitor both magnetic and electric field effects. Dose- response • relations were investigated ted in the general range of 10 micro Tesla (pT) to 1 mi lli Te sla ( mT) (0,1 to 10 G and 1 to 50 kV /m, because these levels } bracket those existing under a 765 -kV line. a t r s; is S E, 4 f The research was undertaken in general subject areas as follows: 1. Genetic, pytogenetic,.teratogenic and re roductive studies: Three studies were performed in this area: one in which two strains of mice were exposed either to fields of two different intensities or control (unexposed) conditions for three generations (Carsten, ndix 10 ape ) and two .projects in which human lymphocytes (Cohen, Appendix 4; Livingston, 9 • Appendix 6) and Chinese hamster fibroblasts (Livingston, Appendix 6 g pp ) in tissue culture were exposed. The Carsten studies revealed no significant effects in the incidence in mice of dominant lethal mutations, fertility as measured by impregnation, gestation time, litter loss, litter size, weight gain or average generation time. None of the studies on sister- chromatid exchange, chromosome breakage, mitotic rate, cell -cycle duration, rate "z of cell proliferation, DNA content or reproductive integrity as measured s4 a by a standard colony assay (clonogenicity) showed significant differences between exposed and controls. 2. Cell biology studies Investigations were performed on osteoblastic cell lines (Rodan, Appendix 13), because electric and magnetic fields have been reported to alter bone growth. However, no effects of fields were found on rate of growth or ligand- receptor interactions as measured by parathyroid hormone activation of adenylate cyclase. Small but significant stimulation 3 ' gn t of H- thymidine incorporation into DNA by electric fields was observed. Because of the exposure of the eyes to the environment and known effects of other forms of electromagnetic irradiation on ocular tissues, a study was done on corneal and lens cell and organ cultures (Basu, Appendix 5). Little effect was found on DNA and protein synthesis, 5 • vi ability or ATPase activity, cell a y g rowth characteristics, lens 9 hydration or corneal wound healing. In a study of cells of the immune system, canine and human po leukocytes in culture exposed to fields did not show significant changes in functional responses to g mito ens levels of DNA, RNA or protein • surface li and receptors and i�oglobulins synthesis or levels of cell surfa g P (Winters,.Appendix 9). 3. Proliferation of can cer cells in culture: Although not a part of the original contract, Winters ( A p pendix 9) performed studies using soft agar cloning assays to assess the proliferative response of normal cells and human colon carcinoma cells to fields, and reported that for the cancer cells, but not the normal cells, magnetic or combined magnetic • reased cell and electric fields caused inc proliferation, increased P n ferrin receptors, numbers of surface tra tors, increased resistance to s P • and increased natural-killer-cell activities expression of tumor cell- a P • surface antigens. The obs ervation that normal cells did not grow in sift . agar is consistent with the conclusion that exposure to the fields did not cause cells to become cancerous. The observations with the cancer cells, however suggested to the investigators the possibility that magnetic fields stimulate the rate of cancer cell growth. Even if this observation were confirmed, however, extrapolation to the behavior because behavior of cells in humans it is not justified of cancer cells in soft agar ar is not predictive of their behavior in the whole organism. extrapolate between growth of cells no basis to extra Furthermore, there is P malignant which are mali ant and initiation or promotion of cancer in the whole organism. CG h Because this experimental design was not part of the original contract (which was to perform in mmologic studies), outside consultants expert in this research area were asked to site visit and review the experimental design and data (Drs. J. Trent and R. Buick, Appendix 18). In their report these experts indicated that the conclusions drawn by the contractor were not justified by the experimental data. However, because the reported results generated consideration attention and concerns, the panel solicited a replication of the study by Cohen and Hamburger (Appendix 18). Using the same cell lines as Winters ( but a slightly different field geometry) , Cohen and Hamburger concluded that neither magnetic or magnetic plus electric fields affected clonogenicity in soft agar of either cell line. Attempts to demonstrate altered oncogene expressions were not successful ( Trent, Appendix 18). 4. Neurobiolo : Three projects investigated various nervous system effects. To rsue reports from other laboratories that fields cause pu po specific and severe pathological changes in the cerebellum of developing animals, Gona (Appendix 11) performed studies in which rat pups were exposed pre - and postnatally to electric or magnetic fields or both. He found no significant morphological or ultrastructural changes of the cerebellum or cerebrum, no differences in DNA, RNA, protein or cerebroside content and no differences in time of eye opening, motor activity or body weight between exposed and control animals. The cerebellum of the developing animal is a sensitive structure whose development and maturation in many animals and humans are similar. A lack of morphological and biochemical changes argues against major direct effects of the fields on the processes of cell differentiation, 7 migration or s yn p 9 a to enesis. Specific questions of neuronal connectivity are not answered by these studies, but the apparently normal behavior o offspring f the offs rin suggests that major connections are intact. Gundersen (Appe ndix 5 ) found no effects of 60 -Hz electrical fields of up to 30 kV /m (air equ ivalent ) and circularly polarized magnetic fields, of 100 pT (1 G) on calc i efflux from dissociated spinal cord • o 26% neurons, but did find small (up t ) but statistically significant increases es in of miniature end plate potentials (events • release reflecting spontaneous transmitter ) induced by linearly but not • magnetic fields. Gundersen and colleagues circularly polarized gn speculate that the changes han in frequency are related to alteration of � intracellular calcium concentration. Wolpaw and Seegal (Appendix 17) studied a variety of elect rophysiological and neurochemical indicators in awake monkeys • exposed to fields for prolonged period s of time. No significant effects • well-being, demeanor, weight, blood were .found in measures of general 9 c performance chemistries or of a simple motor task.. There were no mid-latency components effects on early or mid cy of the auditory, visual and potentials, somatosensory evoked although late components of the ' r somatosensory evoked potentials were decreased, as has been reported by po others. Exposure to combined electric and magnetic fields were • associated with a significant decrease in the concentration of two , neurotransmitter metabolites, homovanilic acid (HVA) and 5 hydroxyindol eacetic acid (5 HIAA) in cerebral spinal fluid. There was a n eventual return of HVA to normal while there was a long -term suppression of the 5 -HIAA levels. The mechanism and significance of f, C S • this effect is unknown, but the investigators believe that the changes in somatosensory evoked potential in the absence of alterations of auditory or visual evoked potentials could be due to changes in central opiates. Both the 5 -HIAA and the somatosensory evoked potential results point to spinal cord localization of the effect. 5. Behavior Four studies were principally behavioral (Ossenkopp, Salzinger, Sulzman and Thomas). All studies demonstrated significant alterations of behavior. In his original project Ossenkopp (Appendix 12) looked for effects of magnetic fields on susceptibility to seizures in rodents. Magnetic fields at some [100 -150 vT'(1.0 - 1.5 G)], but not all flux densities significantly reduced mortality from drug - induced seizures, and in kindled animals there was a significant decrease in the duration of the after discharge in exposed animals. At the request of the New York Panel this contract was extended to a study of effects of magnetic fields on morphine- induced analgesia, studied in rats. While no significant effects were observed on daytime analgesia levels, there was a significant reduction in the analgesic effect of morphine at night in exposed animals which was a linear function of field strength. Additional studies showed that magnetic fields function as a weak environmental cue which could gain stimulus control over the expression of tolerance.to morphine administration. These observations implicate effects on circadian rhythms, and this assumption was documented by the studies of Sulzman and Murrish (Appendix 7) who studied the circadian rhythms of squirrel monkeys and found that electric fields altered free- running circadian periods in an intensity dependent fashion. At higher intensities the alterations were D magnetic fields were held constant in these studies. 5alzin • ger s study (Appendix 14) focused on behavioral alterations of • the first rst e i ht days of life. He found rats exposed in u_tero and for 9 the ._groups conditioned on the multiple random interval schedule to show • rate relative to controls after a significant reduction on response exposure to electric magnetic tric lus ma etic fields. The difference in performance was maintained and even increased with further conditioning designed to measure one kind.of test is one desi and extinction. This 9 memory, and thus the results may be important. gn Thomas (Appendix 8) found no significant effects of 60 -Hz electric fields on several behavioral tasks or magnetic fi , and on the behavioral effects of amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide. He did find, however, a • low level 60 -Hz magnetic field with a si.gnif scant effect of combining a low level static magnetic field. Animals so exposed consistently g exhibited changes in rate and pattern of responding to the same tests which were applied above suggesting that static magnetic fields of the order of those of the earth may alter the effects of superimposed 60 -Hz f ields . • of huma ex 6. Multidisciplinary studies sure: Graham and co- workers po ( Appendix 2 developed a system for controlled exposure of human volunteers in electric fields of 0 -16 kV /m and /or magnetic fields of 0 to 40 NT (0. 4 G ) g . The investigators first determined human perception of fields and found that individuals varied in their ability to detect fields, but 90% had thresholds above 9 kV /m. Perception was dependent upon body position, sition but not time of day. The second part was a double-blind stud of healthy male volunteers in whom a variety of physiologic and behavioral tests were done before and after exposure to 10 fields at various intensities for 6 -hour sham and actual exposure periods. No significant effects were observed on vital signs except for a small but statistically significant.lengthening of the cardiac interbeat interval. Sleep, appetite, sexual activity, cognitive and physical functions were not changed, nor were several monitors of mood. There was.a reduction in amplitude of late components of the evoked potential to a signal detection task and an attenuation of the normal reduction in amplitude of late components of the evoked response in the auditory oddball task. While most performance tests were unchanged, several were altered in small but significant ways. 7. Epidemiology of cancer incidence: Because Wertheimer and Leeper (1979; 1982) reported an association between residential exposure to magnetic fields and incidence of cancer in children and adults in Denver, Colorado, two epidemiological investigations were done to a) study incidence of cancers in children in the Denver, Colorado area ( Savitz, Appendix 15) and b) study the incidence of adult nonlymphocytic leukemia in Seattle, Washington (Stevens, Appendix 16) as a function of residential exposure to electric and magnetic fields. In the Savitz case - control study, all cases of childhood cancer (ages 3 -14) between 1978 and 1983 were selected. Controls were identified through random digit dialing and matched by age and sex. Exposure was estimated by determination both of wiring configuration outside the home, as developed by Wertheimer and Leeper (1979), and by direct measurement of the fields. Wiring configuration was found to correlate with the field measurements, and the major factor contributing to magnetic fields was found to be distribution lines. There was a positive association between wiring configuration and increased cancer 11 risk. This held for all childhood cancers, especially for leukemias, and to a lesser degree, for brain tumors. There appearea Lv VU d dose response relation, in spite of the inexact measures of exposure. The relative risk was above 2 for the highest exposed.group. No sources of bias were identified to explain the results although the somewhat, limited response rate remains a concern. In the study of adult non- lymphocytic leukemia (Stevens) similar procedures i n general were used but no association between cancer and magnetic field exposure, as measured by wiring configuration, direct field ld measurement or an engineering -based code, was found in the 164 cases and 204 controls. In conclusion, results of the New York funded projects document biologic effects of electric and magnetic fields in several systems. The variety of effects of magnetic fields have not been previously appreciated. concern for Several .areas of potential co public health have been identified, p but more research must be done before final conclusions can be drawn. Of Particular concern is the demonstration of a possible association of residential magnetic fields with incidence certain childhood cancers* t gn Further rther stud of this possible association and mechanisms to explain it are important. . The variety riet of behavioral and nervous system effects may not major i to or constitute a ma hazard because most appear to be reversible, but they may temporarily impact ct tem raril on human function. Further research should also be done in this area. 12 y 1 Y S c Analysis Media Hype Surroi NYSPLP Scientific Final Report ends Release of Advisory Panel's by Thomas N. Duening Managing Editor A flood of .articles. and commentar- ies in the popular media accompa- nied the July 8 release of the New York State Power Lines Project (PLP) Scientific Advisory Panel's final report. For the most part, the popular accounts focused on the Panel's interpretation of the child- hood cancer study conducted by David A. Savitz, PhD [see page 7]. Specifically, the attention has cen- tered on the Panel's estimate that 10- 15% of all childhood cancer cases in the United States may be attribut- able to the magnetic fields associ- ated with distribution lines [see page 8]. Among the national publi- cations that have picked up on this report are Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times. In addition, an Associated Press article was run in numerous newspapers around the country. The article in The Wall Street Jour- nal is probably the most accurate and thoroughly - researched of the three, although somewhat inflam- matory. Included in that article is a quote from David O. Carpenter, MD, New York State Department of Health and head of the PLP: "'The State's findings are sufficiently worrisome that we should begin to change the way we wire our homes and not delay for another 10 years for additional epidemiological stud - ies." We contacted Carpenter to verify the accuracy of that quote. He said, "The quote is accurate; that is what I have been saying to the re- porters that have been contacting me. However, most of the popular accounts have overlooked the many remarks within the Panel's report which urge a cautious interpretation of the data." Carpenter emphasized that the Panel specifically recom- mends that individuals not begin taking action to protect themselves. Nevertheless, he said, "The Panel really believes that there is some- thing going on even though the mechanisms of interaction remain unclear. We just feel that, rather than waiting another ten years, the weight of the evidence is strong enough that we should get our engi- neering together to lessen the mag- netic fields in homes." Carpenter said that the PLP would like to see the EMF health effects issue be- come the concern of a Federal agency such as the National Insti- tutes for Health. Carpenter added that he is distressed by the fact that most of the articles that have appeared in the popular media have focused on the Savitz study to the exclusion of the other PLP projects. He said, "Of the 16 studies, only three have reported no significant effects. Most studies reported some small changes. Per- haps as disturbing as the Savitz find- ings are the reported nervous system effects. There are some potential serious problems in this area." We asked Carpenter why some of the recent articles have pointed to an apparent discrepancy between the Panel's report and comments made by Michael L. Shelanski, MD, PhD, the Panel's chair, at the PLP's annual meeting last April [April TDHSR, p I]. At that meeting, Shelanski had said that there appears to be a very low if any —cancer risk from living near transmission lines. Carpenter said that Shelanski's comments at the meeting were being misinterpreted as indicating no health risks. Actu- ally, he said, Shelanski's comments were intended to prevent individual action —much as Carpenter's own comments are now —and that there is no disagreement between Shelan- ski and the rest of the Panel. Part of PLP's original man- date was to make suggestions con- cerning electric and magnetic field limits for the New York Public Serv- ice Commission (PSC). Although the Panel decided not to address the regulatory issue in its report, the PSC will be examining the possibil- ity of setting standards. In a tele- phone interview, the PSC's Daniel A. Driscoll, PE, PhD, told us that an internal task force is being formed to review the Panel's final report as well as the research reports from the - individual PLP projects. He said that he expects this group will come up with some recommendations in about a month. In 1978, the PSC had imposed a 1.6 -kV /m edge- of -right- of -way limit for transmission line electric fields as an interim measure until the results of the PLP's re- search were in. Meanwhile, in North Caro- lina, Savitz has been deluged with telephone calls from concerned landowners. In a telephone inter- view, he told us that he has received approximately 75 such calls in addi- tion to about 25 calls from the me- dia. In fact, Savitz said, some re- 2 Transmission/Distribution HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 a 0 • 13 Attachment 2 porters had tracked him down at his hotel while he was on vacation. We asked Savitz if he con - sidered the Panel's interpretation of his findings to be accurate. He said that he agreed with their assessment and algebra that --if his observed association is causal and if the fre- quency distribution of wiring con- figurations observed in Denver is representative of the United States as a whole -- residential magnetic field exposures could account for 10-15% of childhood cancer cases in the United States. However, he emphasized that "the media has inappropriately latched on to that figure, losing sight of the important uncertainties attached to it, which the Panel had acknowledged." Nonetheless, Savitz considers his findings solid enough to urge addi- tional research. Savitz had recently re- ceived the last of PLP's funding to further analyze his childhood cancer data. He said that this work is "well along" with a manusctipt expected soon. He pointed out that, for the most part, the additional analyses corroborate his initial assessment of the data. C Investigators Interpret Savitz Results Cautiously As distinct from the media, the Savitz project investigators have been interpreting their results with considerable caution. Savitz himself, in the abstract for a paper he presented at the Society for Epi- demiologic Research in June, wrote: "This study provides some support for the suggestion that long -term low -level magnetic fields may promote cancer in chil- dren. The incomplete response and uncertainty about the historical predictiveness of the exposure measures limit the study conclu- sions." Concern over the validity of the exposure measures also underlay a paper presented by one of Savitz's co- investigators at the Bioelectromagnetics Society an- nual meeting, also in June. Howard Wachtel, PhD, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing, University of Colorado, Boul- der, discussed the relative merits of "wiring configuration" (WC) ver- sus "point -in- time" 60 -11z mag- netic field measurements under low house power conditions (what Wachtel termed "MAGLO "). According to the abstract: "It has been previously suggested that WC might be a better indica- tor of `long -term' ELF magnetic field dosimetry and this purport- edly is why it shows higher odds ratios than MAGLO. If true, this would support speculation of a causal link between ELF mag- netic fields and childhood cancer. However, if it were to turn out that MAGLO is actually the better long -term indicator of ELF do- simetry, then the interpretation becomes completely reversed and the results of this study would argue against that speculation. Thus aclear resolution of which is the better `historical' ELF field indicator (WC or MAGLO) is critically needed in order to fur- ther interpret the results of this study." [emphasis in original] The Savitz study had found a strong association using wiring configuration: an odds ratio (OR) of 5.4 for VHCC ( "very high current configura- tion," which presumably pro- duced the highest exposure lev- els) residences, versus a very low and non - statistically significant OR of 1.3 for the highest MAGLO residence group (?2.5 mG). In his talk, Wachtel said of these find- ings, "We were well aware that each of these [two surrogate meas- ures of long -term exposure] had certain advantages and certain dis- advantages. We did not expect the results to concur completely, but I must say that I was surprised at the correlation we got... They differ quite markedly." The disparity might be ex- plained by what Wachtel charac- terized as some "Factor X." Ana- lyzing the measurements compo- nent of the Stevens study which had been conducted by William T. Kaune, PhD, formerly with Bat- telle Pacific Northwest Labora- tory, Richland, Wash. [Nov/Dec 86 TDHSR, p - 10] Wachtel observed that MAGLO was a somewhat bet- ter predictor of Kaune's 24 -hour measurements than was WC and that the number of service drops also resulted in a better correlation. Number of service drops alone is also related to housing density —a potential confounder that was not considered in the Savitz study and, Wachtel argued, is therefore one plausible candidate for Factor X. ❑ Transmission/Distribution HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 3 14 Transmission /Distribution 0 ET 4Dt HEA A LT &S F Y RliE_ Ri a monthl�� rev',., of rAsearch and regulatory d ev e 10 1 T ,-, n t s VOLUME 5, Number 6 June /July 1987 IN THIS ISSUE New York State Media Hype Surrounds 2 Release olNYSPLPSCIentlfJc Power Lines Project Issues Long= AdvlsoTlPara:'S Final RepOft Awaited Final Report Investigators interpret 3 saviaResurrs Cautiously Engineering measures to reduce background A BtletNYSPLPHistory 4 residential magnetic field levels recommended IN BRIEF 4 ALBANY, N.Y. The widely- anticipated final report of the nine- member New England/Hydro QuBbec Scientific Advisory Panel to the New York State Power Lines Project (PLP) Phase H project hits unexpected was released by the New York State Department of Health on July 8 [see certification snag in Canada; BPA publishes second report on NEW pUBLICATIONS]. The 153 -page document (not including appendi- agriculture study; People; and mss) represents the culmination of PLP's five -year $5 million program to induct research and review the literature concerned with the potential n7ore"' health effects of power-frequency electric and magnetic fields [see page 4]. In their report, the Panel wrote that most of the PLP- sponsored studies "have NYSPLP Research Reports y Q reported no effects of concern." However, the Panel did identify "several areas of potential concern for public health" that require further study. SPECIAL REPORT 11 The Panel's report was submitted to its oversight board consisting of 1.986 Contractors' Review three state agency heads: State Health Commissioner David Axelrod, MD; Technical Summary (Part 7) Power Authority Chairman Richard Flynn; and Public Service Commission Del L. Lessor; Charles Graham; (PSQ Chainnan Peter Bradford. The Panel declined to make any regulatory Timothy E. Aldrich; M. Granges recommendations, but the PSC will review the study results and the Panel's Morgan; David E. Janes report to determine whether any policy changes are warranted [see page 21. The PLP research program had provided funding for 16 research CALENDAR 16 projects studying human, animal, and isolated cell sensitivity to 60 -Hz electric and magnetic fields. PLP- sponsored research was undertaken in NEW PUBLICATIONS 16 seven general subject areas: 1) genetic, cytogenetic, teratogenic and repro- ductive studies; 2) cell biology; 3) cancer cell proliferation in vino; 4) neurobiology; 5) behavior, 6) multidisciplinary studies of human exposure; and 7) epidemiology of cancer incidence. READER ALERT• 'Qn August The Panel report represents a major contribution to the field, 13 between B:OQ and 8:30 AM EDT, including not only an extensive evaluation of all the research projects con- NBC's TODAYsfioWis sdheduled to ducted under PLP auspices but also a review of the world literature con- EPRI's Leonard A. Sagan, corned with the power- frequency EMF health effects issue. Because of this ko feature epidemiologist David A. Savitz and P �A'8 Richard Q. P New York State/to s The editors welcome oo -,-vs contributions. Call the Newsl ",-_ • + 1 (612) 623 -4646 15 New York State earth geomagnetic field and The Panel Scientific 60-Hz fields. Findings 3. The determination of the exis- comprehensiveness, and because of fence of thresholds for biologic � the well- reasoned articulation of its effects of magnetic flux dense- The following is a topic - -topic findings, the Panel's report will ties should be p ursued. P summa the Panel's report. W summ of p e i undoubtedly become a very mpor- 40 The experiments on field effects stress that the report covered the font document to those concerned on learning ability should be PLP- sponsored studies as well as with this issue. replicated. the ertinent world literature. p �rerall the Panel's find- 5. The possible association be- However, only PLP - investigators ings —in particular, its focus on tween cancer (especially leuke- are cited b name see y [ box on page magnetic fields— represent a sig- mias) and magnetic fields must -10 for the 16 research roects ' . P � � ni ficant d from departure ro the findings be further investigated. Several of earlier literature reviews: "Re- avenues of stud should be ur. y P Reproduction : and Development: n p p e t salts of the New York fund funded pro,- sued: The Panel explained that the ues- 9 ects document biolog effects of g a. There should be further epi- tion of interest in this area is whether electric and magnetic fields in sev- demiolo 'c stud of residential � y l l or not electric and/or magnetic d! greet c stems. The variety eral systems. a ety of effects exposure, conducted at more fields disrupt ormal reproduction � P magnetic fields have not been than one site with careful mess- and development, thus increasing previously appreciated. Several urement of exposure. Po . the background abnorma b g ality rate. areas of potential concern for public b. Attempts should be made to Under this eneral heading, three g g' health have been identified but correlate cytogenetic and diag- specific areas were considered: more research must be done before .. nostic subgroups of cancers Ps chromosomal (cytogenetic) dam- final conclusions can be drawn. Of with exposures. age, including ister chromatid ex- 8 particular concern is the demonstra. . . . c. Further investigation of oc - change cell c y cle (g enerition ) g y tion of a possible association of rest- cupational exposure and cancer time; and terato enesigrowth and g s, � dential magnetic fields with inci- � incidence should be conducted • •ty. development, and fertility. dente of certain childhood cancers. with improved documentation P Investigation of c m g hro - 0 r Further study of this possible asso- of actual exposures. somes from cells exposed in vitro ciation and mechanisms to explain it P d. Animal models should be de- was undertaken because previous are important. The variety of behav- velo and laboratory investi- P� ry studies had shown that agents 8 coral and nervous system effects gations designed to P� explore - e known to cause chromosomal dam- may not constitute a major hazard sible mechanisms of field -in- age in vivo (e.., ionizing adiation g $ g ) because most appear to be revers- duced carcinogenesis. If an will also show evidence of e dams g ible, but the may impact tem rar- y y P po effect is documented, then the in vitro. The chromosomal end - ily on human function. Further re- dose-response relationship P p points chosen b the Panel f or i po y o is search should also be done in this should be investigated. investig were sister chromatid g area." 6. Further research on the biologic exchange (SCE) frequency, chro- The Panel stated that its effects of electromagnetic mosomal aberration and micronu- findings do not readily translate into fields is very important. It clef formation. SCE is a well- estab- concrete regulatory recommenda- should be administered b an t' lished assay for muta ens and car- y g tions. However, it did make the agent preferably Federal, y P y cino ens. Micronuclei formation g follower recommendations g mendations which is credible by virtue of has been correlated with exp to � (quote): being clearly independent of established clastogens. 1. There should be a major re- partisan influence. Three different PLP re- : .search effort on means of power • Copies of the Scientific Advisory rY search projects (Carsten, Cohen P J and Livingston) investigated SCE g ) g free - delivery and use that would Panel's report and all the PLP indi- � and found no effects of q uenc y e � .reduce magnetic fi eld expo- vidual research project reports are Hz fields. The Panel.vvrote, "SCE sores. 2. Further available. See the box on page 10 for can be said not to be induced b y study should be made of prices and ordering information. electromagnetic fields at the levels the interactive effects of the tested. This is reassuring nd 8 su8 - 6 Transmission/Distribution HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 16 c■ gests that further SCE testing is not required." In addition, micronuclei concentrations were not increased in experiments using Chinese ham - ster ovarian (CHO) cells, and chro- mosomal aberrations were not de- tected in either human or CHO cells. The Panel concluded, "These results suggest that it is unlikely that elec- tromagnetic fields damage human chromosomes." No field- related effects were found on cell cycle (genera- tion) time. While the Panel con - ceded that the Carsten study- - which investigated the possibility of effects on cell cycle —had a small sample size, it concluded, "This does not support the hypothesis that cell growth is affected by chronic exposure." Livingston studied cell cycle in CHO cells and observed no exposure effect. In Carsten's study, two strains of mice were utilized to in- vestigate effects on fetal develop- ment and fertility. The Panel re- ported that no effects were found and concluded that "der testing of mice is not indicated on these endpoints... The fact that no dam- age has been detected in two strains of mice is reassuring even if this does. not constitute definitive proof that humans are similarly vulner- able to these fields." Cancer: This research category was broken into two more specific areas: in vitro studies and human epidemiology. The Panel pointed out that the research conducted by Winters regarding clonogenicity of tumor cells in soft agar was not part of the original PLP research protocols. Nevertheless, because PLP funds were used to construct the exposure apparatus and to support Winters's research, and because the findings that were reported caused some public concern, this research was discussed in the final report. Briefly, Winters had claimed that magnetic fields stimu- late growth of tumor cells in soft agar [April 84 TDHSR, p 3]. The Panel's report emphasized that "these investigators did not find evidence of transformation of nor- mal (non- iymphocytic) cell lines after electromagnetic field exposure as measured by soft -agar clonogen- icity." A site review of this work subsequently attributed the findings to "lack of rigid quality control" [ Oct 84 TDHSR, p 1 ] . The Panel agreed with this review and decided to fund a replicate study. This study (Cohen) was completed and re- ported no consistent pattern of expo- sure effects. Childhood Cancer Study: In their discussion of the epidemiologic studies that had been conducted prior to the PLP program, the Panel said that those studies had often been "criticized for using crude and operational definitions of expo- sure." In contrast, the Panel wrote, "One of the prime concerns of the Powerlines Project has been to have well- documented exposure in the various studies... The Panel also decided that field exposures for animal and human studies should include both electric and magnetic fields." The objective of the Savitz study was to replicate the 1979 Wertheimer and Leeper childhood cancer study in the Denver, Colo., metropolitan area. The results of Savitz's PLP - sponsored study were first made public at the 1986 Con- tractors' Review meeting [Nov/Dec 86 TDHSR, p I). Two methods of exposure assessment were employed in this study: direct point -in -tune meas- Transmissio n/Distribut ion HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 urements within homes and coding of the wiring configuration of nearby electric power distribution systems. This combination was in- tended to support evaluation of the •controversial Wertheimer - Leeper wiring configuration coding scheme against actual measure- ments. The Savitz study did find an association between magnetic field measurements and wire code. The Panel concluded that "the study by Savitz confirms the results of the previous studies to some extent and adds to the credibil- ity of the hypothesis that exposure to extremely- low - frequency magnetic fields might be a cause of childhood cancer." A few cautionary notes were appended to this conclusion: "Although we [the Panel] basically interpret this study as being posi- tive, it is important to note that there are some internal inconsistencies." The Panel wrote that the results "seem to depend" upon the exposure measure utilized. For example, no association was found with high - power magnetic field measure- ments, and there are considerable differences between the results based on wire coding and those based on the low- power - condition measurements. In addition, the Panel noted that basic research has not revealed any mechanism that explains the role of magnetic fields in the etiology of cancer. Further- more, the magnetic field levels ob- served in the Savitz study were so low that "one might be exposed to such fields almost anywhere in the environment." One very interesting and media captivating — computation in the Panel's report concerns the pro- portion of childhood cancer cases attributable to magnetic fields if the Savitz findings are correct. The Panel reasoned: "The incidence rate t4 17 of childhood cancer is approxi- mately 1 per 10,000 per person year. If the association with magnetic fields seen by Savitz is causal with a relative risk of about 2, then, de- pending on level of exposure, the incidence rate for the exposed group would be increased to 2 per 10,000 per person year. With the wire -code distribution that Savitz saw in Den - ver(the figures at other localities are unknown and may vary), and the assumption of a causal effect, this would mean that 10-15% of all childhood cancer cases are attribut- able to magnetic fields." Adult Cancer Study: An adult cancer study (conducted by Ste- vens) was also sponsored by PLP [Nov/Dec 86 TDHSR, p 11. Thi s was a case- control study of acute non- lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) among adults in the Seattle, Wash., metropolitan area. ANLL was cho- sen as an endpoint because of the occupational studies that had shown elevated leukemia risks among workers employed in "electrical oc- cupations." The Panel wrote, "As for the major results of this study, re- gardless of how exposure was char - acterized, no relationship with leu- kemia incidence was disclosed." Coll Biology: Specific parameters investigated in many different labo- ratories include: synthesis of DNA, RNA and protein; rate of cell growth; cell shape; direction of cell growth; genetic alterations; and re- sponsiveness to various stimuli. The Panel stated that it appears that "biological effects can be induced by both DC and AC magnetic and electric fields." PLP investigations showed no effects of exposure on rate of bone growth or ligand receptor in- teractions. However, a small but statistically- significant stimulation of 3 H- thymidine incorporation into DNA by electric fields was ob- served. Immunological studies (Winters) found no changes in syn- thesis of DNA, RNA or protein in normal canine leukocytes in re- sponse to electric, magnetic or combined fields. The Panel wrote, "These findings argue that no nor- mal immunological functions were perturbed by the fields." It cau- tioned, however, that further study is indicated. A study to detect field ef- fects on ocular tissue (Basu) was also conducted under PLP sponsor- ship. Little effect of 60 -Hz fields was found on DNA and protein synthesis, ATPase activity, cell via- bility or growth characteristics, lens hydration or comeal wound healing. After reviewing the world literature in this area, the Panel stated, "While far from established fact, it is likely that membrane con - trol of ionic calcium levels, whether from the extracellular medium or from intracellular stores, might be an important way in which electrical and magnetic fields affect cells." Neurobiology and Behavior: Three PLP projects investigated a variety of nervous system effects. Gona and his colleagues examined the effects of 60 -Hz fields on the development of the rat cerebellum [April 86 TDHSR, p 31. No changes as a result of exposure were ob- served in weight, motor activity, or eye opening time between the con - trol and experimental groups. In addition, electron microscopic ex- amination of cerebellar neurons showed no abnormalities. The PLP also sponsored studies that examined the sensation and/or perception of 60 -Hz fields. The Panel explained that the asso- ciation between sensation/percep- tion and 60-Bz fields is actually two separate problems. "Sensation" refers to the proximal detection of a stimulus while "perception" refers to the response to a sensation that is based upon the leaming or condi- tioning history of the organism. Given these definitions, a stimulus may be sensed but not perceived. . Human exposure experi- ments conducted by Graham [see page 11 ] showed that electric field detection --as defined by verbal report— occurred at or above 9 kV/ m when the subjects were seated. No detection of the magnetic field was observed when it was presented alone. According to the Panel, the only significant physiological change detected in Graham's study involved the P300 component of the evoked potential measure. The ef- fect of the field was to maintain the detection of the mismatched stimuli. Ossenkopp's research dem- onstrated that magnetic field expo - sures can block the analgesic effects of morphine. Mice exposed to vari- ous intensities of 60-Hz fields dem- onstrated an intensity- dependent effect of the magnetic field expo- sures on morphine. After reviewing the litera- ture and these PLP project findings concerning brief (<10 hr) 'expo- sures, the Panel concluded: "1) accurate detection of the presence of an electric field by subjective means begins around 9 kV /m but the threshold is quite variable; 2) 60 -Hz fields can influence pain thresholds, particularly if the noxious or no ciceptive experiences occur during nocturnal periods; and 3) 60-Hz fields do not radically alter cogni- tive activities in a manner that is obviously associated with processes that might affect higher intellectual functioning." The Panel said that a 8 Transmission/Distribution HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 i CI flu r4 C0 caveat to these conclusions is ' that they apply to "normal subjects." Cellular Neuroscience and Calcium: Much of the literature concerned with electric field effects on the nervous system has focused on the physiologically- important calcium ion. Several studies have reported the reduction of calcium efflux from chick neonatal cerebel- lum exposed to electric fields. The PLP - sponsored study conducted by Gundersen found no effects of 60 -Hz electric fields up. to 30 kV/ n and circularly - polarized magnetic fields of 1 G on calcium efflux from dissociated spinal cord neurons [Feb 85 TDHSR, p 31. However, Gundersen also found that linearly - polarized magnetic fields increased the frequency of miniature endplate potentials at the neuromuscular - junction. The physiological implications are not clear, however, if this were a perva- sive phenomenon, an increased cel- lular synthesis of acetylcholine would be required. Biological Rhythms: Three major types of dysfunction can occur in biological (circadian) rhythms: 1) alterations in cycle duration; 2) shifting (lagging) of the cycle peaks; and 3) an uncoupling between cycles. These dysfunctions are important to examine because they can have profound erects upon psy- chological and biochemical proc- esses. The Panel stated that "the major results of studies concerning the effects of power -line fields on circadian - related systems suggest that long -term exposures to electro- magnetic fields can shift or induce a lag in intrinsic rhythms. These shifts may be chronic once they appear. On the other hand, power - frequency electromagnetic fields tend to affect melatonn synthesis . within minutes; however, the effect is transient and reversible within a few hours to days." Seizures, Evoked Responses and Neurochemistry: The Panel pointed out that there is now a long list of physical and chemical agents that can alter seizure likelihood and expression. Ossenkopp's research has indicated that magnetic fields need to be added to that list. These investigations showed that field exposure changes seizure suscepti- bility even after exposure had been terminated. The Panel said that this "argues for a mechanism involving alteration by the fields of brain hormones." The data from this experiment do not suggest a hazard to people with or without seizure disorders. Wolpaw and colleagues examined the effects of 60 -Hz elec- tric and magnetic fields on pig- tailed macaques Macacca nemestrina and found no significant effects on measures of general well being, demeanor, weight, blood chemistries or performance of a simple motor task. Auditory and visual evoked responses were nor - mal. The only consistent effects were significant decreases in con- centrations of both homovanillic acid (HVA) and 5- hydroxyin- doleacetic acid (5HIAA) in the cere- brospinal fluid. These substances are major metabolites of dopamine and serotonin. After a recovery period, HVA concentrations re- turned to normal, but 5HIAA levels remained depressed. , The Panel concluded that this study "leaves unresolved the important question of whether effects on biologic amine metabolism corresponds to abnor- malities in learning or other behav- ior." Learning and Memory: In regard to 60 -Hz field effects upon learning and memory, two questions have been asked: 1) Can these fields affect learning ?; and 2) Can they be integrated into a learning sequence? Three PLP- sponsored projects ad- dressed these questions using rats. The Thomas study examined the effects of brief exposures on adult learning, the Salzinger study exam- ined the effects of prenatal expo- sures on adult learning and the sec- ond part of the Ossenkopp study de- termined the efficacy of the field as a learning cue. The Panel concluded: "Power- line - intensity electromag- netic fields do not appear to influence even the most complex operant schedules during adult learning situations. However, interactions between background geomagnetic field conditions and the 60-Hz magnetic component can influence behavior. The effect is transient and reversible. On the other hard, prenatal exposure to these fields produces more or less permanent changes in response activity. The meaning of the effect is obscure and its onset requires a long history of testing. Finally, 60- Hz fields can become cues that control the occurrence of behaviors, including those that involve tolerance to drugs." Nerve Regeneration: Research has indicated that axonal growth may be regulated by electrochemical phe- nomena. In addition, axonal and/or neurite growth can be modulated by artificially- induced electromag- netic, especially DC fields. Based on their review of the pertinent cel- lular growth literature, the Panel concluded: "Static and .pulsed elec- tromagnetic fields do affect cell growth, differentiation, survival and directional migration. Further- more, .calcium ions play an impor- Transmission/Distribution HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 19 tart role in this phenomenon. However, much more research needs to be conducted before the issue of mechanisms and hazards, if any, can be rationally discussed." The Panel also pointed out that interest has recently developed concerning the possibility of en- hancing peripheral nerve regenera- tion by exogenous electric fields including extremely -low- frequency fields. El PLP Research Reports (investigators listed by current affiliation) The following reports can be purchased from the New York State Department of Health. Contact: David O. Carpenter, MD, School of Public Health Sciences, Wadsworth Laboratories, Room E297, Empire State Plaza, Albany, N.Y. 12201. Telephone: +1 (518) 474 -7888. Make checks payable to `Health Research.' Biological effects of power line fields` New York State Power Lines Project Scientific Advisory Panel final report 1987. 153p. First copy free; additional copies, $42.00. Prasants K. Basu, MB, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Ontario. Biological Effects of Extremely Low Frequency Electric and hiWetic Fields on Ocular Tissues:. art In vitro Study. 1986. 112p. $28.00. Arland L Carsten, PhD, Medical Department, Brookhaven National Laboratories, Upton, N.Y. lttag►eniaty and Toxicity of Electric and ftgnetk Fiekb. 1987. 186p. $49.00. Maimon M. Cohen, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. In vitro Genetic Effects of Electromagneddc Field& 1986. 100p. $25.00. Maimon M. Cohen, PhD, The Effects of Low, Level Electromagnedc Fields on Cloning of Two Human Cancer Cull Lines (COL0205and COLO 320). 1967. 36p. $8.50. Amo* G. Gona, PhD, Department of Anatomy, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark. Effects of 60-Hz Electric and Aftnetic Fiekls on 09 Developing Rat Brain 1987. 40p. $9.00. Charles Graham, PhD, Life Sciences Department, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Mo. Influence of 60-Hz Fields on Human Behavior,, l!hysiolooy, and Biochemistry. 1985. 102p. $25.50. ' Ross W. Gunderson, PhD, Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Parkside, Kenosha. Effects of 60 -Hz Electromagnetic Fields on Calcium Efflux and Neurotransmitter Release 1986. 46p. $11.50. Go# K Livingston, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City. Reproductive Integrity of Mammalian Cefls Exposed to 60-Hz Electromagnetic Fields 1986. 45p. $11.25. Klaus -Peter Ossenkopp, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London. ELF Low Intensity Magnetic Fields and Epilepsy. Part 1, 1986. 31 p. Part 2, 1987. 31 p. $13.00. Gideon A. Roden, MD, PhD, Department of Oral Biology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington. Effect of 60 -Hz Electric and Magnetic Field on Neural and Skeletal Cells in Cultura 1987. 39p. $10.00. Kurt Salzinger, PhD, Department of Psychology, Polytechnic Institute of New York, Brooklyn. Behaviora/Effects of ELF. 1987. 137p. $34.00. David A. Savitz, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chilc hood Cancer and Electromagnetic Field Eitposure. 1987. 178p. $45.00. Richard G. Stevens, PhD, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Wash. Epidemiological Stucles of Cancer and Residential Exposure to Elec"magnedc Fields 1986. 50p, and William T. Kaune, PhD, Reskbntiai Magnetic and Electric Fields Measured over 24- hr Periods, 1987. 109p. (159p. total) $40.00. Frank M. Sulzman, PhD, Space Medicine Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. Effects of Electromag- netrc Fields on Primate Cacadian Rhythms 1986. 65p. $16.25. John R. Thomas, PhD, Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, W. Investigation of Potential Behavioral Effects of Exposure to 60 -Hz Electrwagneac Fields. 1986. 75p. $18.75. Wendell W. Winter's, PhD, Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio. Biological Functions of Immunologically Reactive Human and Canine Cells Influenced byin Vitro Exposures to Electric and Magnetic Fields. 1986. 105p. $26.25. Jonathan R. Wolpaw, MD, Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, Albany. Chronic Effects of 60-14z Electric and Magnetic Fields on Primate Central Nervous System Function 1987. 109p. $41.25. y Transmission/Distribution HEALTH & SAFETY REPORT : June /July 1987 20 91 C is' I1 MAGNETIC FLUX DENS (60 Hz) Ambient Background Within Homes ' Away from Appliances . Next to Appliances ' Electric Blankets . Distribution /Sub Trans. Lines Edge of ROW 4 ' Within ROW . High Voltage Trans. Lines Edge of ROW ' Within ROW . Occupational Environments . Office 1 ' Specialized, High Exposure KEY .01 .1 1 10 100 1,000 Rare - 71 microtesta Common Exposure Potentials .35 microtesta at the easement line .14 microtesta at Gail Avenue Figure 2. Magnetic flux densities measured in various locations (Adapted with permission from WEST Associates, 1986). - 21 Attachment 3 1. 1� f} ` � r � • TABL I, 11-2 500 -1000 microtesla 1 -1 mi r 0 c otesla 5 - 10 Gauss 0.01 - 0.1 Gauss Can opener 140 Watt Soldering Gun Fluorescent Desk Lamp Kitchen Range Electric Shaver LOCALIZED 60 -HERTZ MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITIES PRODUCED BY ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES 1000 -2500 m i c rote s l a 10 - 25 Gauss 1 -100 mi crotes 1 a 0.01 - 1.0 G auss 325 Watt Soldering Gun To Auto .Trans Toy ormer Magnetic Stirrer Garbage Disposal Power Feeder Cable Clothes Dryer Hair Dryer Black /White Television Set ' Vacuum Cleaner Heating Pad Electric Toaster Bell Transformer 100 -500 m i c rotes 1 a 1 - 5. Gauss Bench Grinder Arc Welder Food Mixer Power Transformer Induction Motor Color Television Set .Food Blender Electric Drill Portable Heater }tome Electric Service Unit Kitchen Fluorescent Lamp Dishwasher Laundry Washer Phonograph Calculator Electric Iron .1 -1 mi crotes 1 a 0.001 - 0.01 Gauss Refrigerator Maplewood power line (outside easement) Source: Bridges, 1975 '(from Miller, D.A. 1974 "Electric and Magnetic Fields Produced b Commercial Power S ystems , " y Llaurdo, J. G. et al., Biolog ic and Clinical Effects of Low- Magnetic and E ectri.c Fie s , C ar es C. omas, Springfield, . F t II -15 ' 22 Attachment 4 r ISO N —.. � ... _ _ _.��._Y�S_ ._ ,__L,____ _ .- __- _— _— ____...- ___.__... _I_— __._.__._. ._ _ - _ _ e tyr � .:�'h1 1 , . ••.n «v.+- cmF.».vm , RVn+^'.. .rn.'n+T I . >mwv. M.tw :r rv:wnr�- Mmaz. 1 _� —._ —. _L- �. —.tl_ _ - -.: ,I. — :'__—� =__ ( r..,., rwrm^•, ��1 "�.'I�lil�- ?r M n � - rR .g1 .I�s��..r��rMe.,�FrH rvp- �. ^r- ,e.- ... , ,,1 r,n. �e.�.. ,....,.,,,.1 -""" . - " � - - ..< _ .� =.pa <�.r�a «..wn. I �r.s�....r+�..+r�l w r? 4 3 FA 1 Magnetic Field Microteela D c+ c+ 0 Feet From Center Of Tower MAGNETIC FIELD FROM NSP POWER LINES AT COUNTY ROAD D AND BELLAIRE .36 1 � .3 I 0 I I I I ;I Proposed Gall Ave Proposed location of houses relative to NSP power line and Amoco Pipeline 24 Attachment 6 4 N UNDEVELOPED LAND ADJACENT 'YO HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSITION LINES 25 Attachment 7 4 N MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Preliminary Plat Bellaire Street and County Road D Bruce Mogren Tilsen Homes, Inc. Maplewood Meadows July 29, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction 1�12 1 �y Council: Endorsed Modified..., Rejected ,.. Date The applicant is requesting approval of a 36 -lot preliminary plat. Ref er to the proposed plat on page 15, Background The city approved a planned unit development (PUD) and preliminary plat in 1983 for 18 double. dwellings and one single dwelling. The city also approved the vacation of Lakewood Drive and the ark" south of the lat p p This PUD and preliminary plat approval has expired. In 1985, council rezoned this site to R -2, double dwelling. Council amended the subdivision code on May 7, 1987 to allow lots with a minimum frontage of 60 feet and a minimum area of 7,500 square feet. Discussion -- Setback to the Pipeline Lots 1 through 12 and 21 would be within 100 feet of the Amoco Pipeline. The city's past policy has been to require a setback of 100 feet, unless berming or some other mitigating device is provided. Recommendation Approve the Maplewood Meadows Addition preliminary plat (plans dated 5- 19 -87) subject to satisfaction of. the following conditions prior to final plat approval: 1. District court approval to release the city park land that was previously vacated, subject to retaining a ponding easement over Outlots C through I. 2. Any portion of the former park that will be combined with property to the south shall be designated as an outlot. A recordable deed for each outlot to be transferred shall be submitted to the city. The city will record the deed(s) once the plat is recorded. A check for the recording costs shall be submitted with the deed (s) . The property owner to receive the deed must agree to accept it. 4 3. Any of the former park land that is not included in condition two must be combined with the adjacent lots to the north. Lot lines shall coincide with the proposed lot lines to the north as much as possible,, 4. Redesign the plat for staff approval to provide for at least a 100 -foot setback from the pipeline or provide at least a six -foot berm to protect the homes within 100 feet against the radiant heat from an explosion. If berms are provided, the homes may not be constructed within 80 feet of the pipeline. 5. Omit Lot 21 Block Two, if the adjacent park land to the south is not included. Lots 18 through 20 may be redesigned for double - dwelling lots. 6. The pipeline easement must be. clearly labeled and designated on the plat. The easement must be included in the title for each effected property. 7. Submit recordable deed restrictions for each double- fronting lot to prohibit access from County Road D. 8. City recording of the previously adopted resolutions to vacate Lakewood Drive between Brenner Avenue and County Road D. Recordin g of these easements is subject to the submission of the developer's agreement to guarantee compliance with the conditions of vacation. 9. City engineer approval of the final grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. The portion of the grading plan within the Amoco and NSP easements must also be approved by these respective corporations. The grading plan shall be revised as follows: a. If the property owner to the south of proposed Outlot C will receive proposed Outlot C, then the pond shall be shifted to the north and west to minimize its encroachment on this outlot. Grading of this outlot area shall also be minimized. b. The pipeline's elevation and location shall be shown on the grading plan. c. The erosion control recommendations made by the Soil Conservation Service in their letter dated June 29, 1987, shall be complied with, d. A skimming device shall be provided at the pond outlet to prevent an oil leak from going downstream. 10* The portion of the plat located east of proposed Lot 21 shall be named "Bellaire Avenue ". 119 Submittal of a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, to include but not be'limited to: a. Enlarging the pond, as directed by the city engineer, west of Lakewood Drive and constructing storm sewer from this site to that pond, b.' Construction of all required on -site ublic improvements, P c. Removing the_ Lakewood Drive street surface north of Gall Avenue and ' seeding the vacated right-of-way, d. Replacing the asphalt curb at Brenner Avenue and Lakewood Drive with a concrete curb. e. Adherence to the erosion contro procedures outlined on e a p g four of the Soil Conservation Service's letter dated-June 29 19870 3 CITIZEN COMMENTS 51 persons who own property within 350 feet were -asked their opinion of this-proposal. Of the 25 persons who responded, eight were in ..favor, three have no comment, and 14 are opposed. Those in favor generally preferred single dwellings to the previously approved town house and double - dwelling development proposals. Those opposed listed the following concerns: 1. The lots are too narrow. The lots should be at least as wide as the lots on Brenner Avenue. The density is too high for the neighborhood. Existing homes would be devalued by the homes to be built on these smaller lots. Staff comment: This proposal is consistent with the land use plan. This property is planned for RM, medium density residential use. The respondents' properties to the south and west are planned for RL, low density residential use (10,000- square -foot lots). In areas planned for RM use, 60- foot - wide, 7 single - dwelling lots, double dwellings, town houses, and apartments are permitted. 20 More car traffic. (Property owner on Brenner Avenue.) Staff comment: There will be no increase in traffic on Brenner Avenue due to this proposal. Also, according to Dan Soler, the county highway engineer, traffic at McKnight Road and County Road D is 6,900 ADT (average daily traffic) . McKnight Road is designed to safely handle upwards of 11 to 13,000 ADT. Assuming that 3.5 to 4 vehicle trips per day would be generated from each of the 37 proposed dwellings, the ADT would increase to only 7,048- -well within the design limits for the area streets. 3. It has been designated as a park. Also we tried to build here and were told we could not because of the power lines. What has changed? Staff comment: No portion of this site is designated for park. A narrow parcel that lies along the south line of this site was g iven to the city for park use in 1978. However, because no practical park use could be made of this "park property ", the city council vacated the public .interest in that land. It is to be combined with the adjoining g property for additional rear -yard area. A 225 -foot -wide NSP easement does cross this property but none of the dwellings would be built within the easement area. 4. I would like to see some natural habitat kept in this area. Staff comment: The southerly 200+ feet of the site will be left as open rear -yard area. Two storm water ponds will be created and the easterly third of this area, along the south property line, is not proposed - to be graded, 5. Where is the water supply going to come from? The present system is under - pressurized. Are there plans for a water tower in this area? 4 Staff comment: North St. Paul supplies the city water to this part of Maplewood.. The city engineer for North St. Paul states that the pressure at the hydrants in this area is between 40 and 50 psi. This is an acceptable pressure. About 20 to 25 psi is .considered the minimum acceptable for fire fighting. Persons with homes on the higher lots this area will have a lower pressure, but this pressure difference occurs at similar elevations throughout the water supply system. The 37 proposed dwellings will not have a noticeable effect on existing pressure levels, according to the city engineer for Maplewood and for North St. Paul. Construction of a water tower is not planned. 6. We are opposed until we have more information including home sizes, selling prices and lot sizes. I suggest a minimum of 1,200 square feet of living area, attached double garages and only single dwellings to maintain a similar value with existing homes. Staff comment: Code requires each dwelling to have at least 740 to 1,040 square feet of area, dependent on the number of bedrooms. Floor .area, in addition to these minimums, cannot be required. City code does not require garages for single or double dwellings. City code does, however, require the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) to approve the exterior design and appearance of the dwellings. Approval requires that no two dwellings, within 500 feet of each other, shall have the same basic floor plan, type of front elevation or arrangement of windows and other openings. If this plat . is approved, the Community Design Review Board will review the design aspects of the structures. Adjoining property owners will be invited to attend. 70 Sound barriers should be constructed along I -694. Staff comment: A Minnesota Pollution Control Agency staff person believes that the proposed 210 -foot setback from the closest traffic lane of I -694 will be adequate to comply with the state's guidelines. The noise level at this location will be monitored to confirm that belief, 5 REFERENCE Site Description Gross area: 11.78 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Existing easements: A 225 - foot -wide NSP transmission easement for high voltage power lines and towers, a 50 -foot -wide Amoco Oil pipeline easement within the NSP easement, and a 20 -foot -wide sanitary sewer easement Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: County Road D. Across the street is I -594. The east bound line is located approximately 180 feet north of the north line of this site. Easterly: Bellaire Avenue. The property east of Bellaire Avenue is owned by the state ( tax - forfeited) . South: 14 single- dwelling properties West: Lakewood Drive and Gall Avenue right -of -way. Lakewood Drive, north of Gall Avenue, is constructed but it is a substandard street surface. South of Gall Avenue, Lakewood Drive has not been constructed. Both sections have been approved for vacation. (Refer to past actions.) Past Actions 7- 25 -83: 10 Council approved the Robert Tilsen Maplewood Heights #11 planned unit development (see page 14) subject to several conditions. 2. Council approved the Robert Tilsen's #11 preliminary plat, (page 14) , subject to conditions including: a. Council authorizing the vacation of Lakewood Drive from Brenner Avenue to County Road D. Final plat approval shall not be granted until a developer's agreement is submitted for the easterly extension of Gall Avenue and the removal and reseeding of Lakewood Drive north of Gall Avenue. b. Council ordering the construction of a storm sewer, west along all Avenue • g prior to final plat approval. If the project is not ordered, approval must be obtained from the city engineer for a drainage plan to enlarge the existing facilities, including the pond west of Lakewood Drive at Brenner Avenue. (The latter option was authorized. See Public Works comments.) c. Submittal of an acceptable erosion control plan before any building permits are issued, which considers the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service. D d . The easterly 50 feet of Lot 25 Block 2. shall be shown as "Bellaire Avenue" right -of -way on the final plat. e. The park lying south. of the proposed plat shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. f . The "park" property lying to the south shall be included in the subject plat. That part of the "park" property to be combined with the single dwelling lots to the south shall be platted as outlots. The remainder of the "park" property shall be included as part of the lots in the proposed plat. g. Prior to final plat approval, deeds shall be submitted to the city for recording for the combination of any of the "park" property with the abutting single- dwelling lots to the south. All costs associated .with the land transfers and combination shall be borne by the developer and included in the developer's agreement for Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #11. Each of the deeds shall include a deed restriction stating that "separation of the properties described in this instrument shall not be permitted unless authorized by the City of Maplewood . " 3. Council approved the vacation of Lakewood Drive, between Gall and Brenner Avenues, subject to the retention of a drainage and utility easement over the entire vacated right -of -way. The following conditions must be satisfied before the resolution may be recorded a. Enter into a developer's agreement and post a 150 percent surety for the removal of the temporary asphalt curb and gutter and to install a permanent curb and gutter along the north line of the intersection of Lakewood Drive and Brenner Avenue. b. Deeding the parcel, lying west of this right -of -way and north' of the "park" in Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #9, to the landowner to the north or to the city to be included with the park property to the south. A public utility and drainage easement shall be granted over the easterly twenty feet. 4. Council approved the vacation of Lakewood Drive, between Gall Avenue and County Road D. The following conditions must be satisfied before the resolution for vacation may be recorded with Ramsey County: a. Removal of the existing asphalt and reseeding the right -of- way. In order to assure the satisfaction of this condition, a developer's agreement with a surety for 150 percent of the estimated cost, shall be submitted to the city engineer. b. The first layer of asphalt must be laid for the extension of Gall Avenue to the east, as proposed in Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #11 preliminary plat. 7 8 -8 -83: Council authorized the vacation of the park located along the south boundary of.this site, subject to the property being combined with adjoining private property and retention of 'a drainage easement (for the ponds to be constructed when the subject property is developed), 4- 24 -84: The Community Design Review Board approved the building elevation and landscape plans for the 11th Addition double dwellings. 9- 24 -84: Council approved a six -month time extension for the Tilsen's #11 PUD and preliminary plat. 2- 24 -85: The PUD expired. The preliminary plat was conditioned upon the PUD. Therefore, it also expired. 5 -6 -8 5 Council rezoned this site from F, farm residence, to R -2, double dwelling. The property owner chose to rezone this site rather than apply for a new PUD. The rezoning eliminated the construction -start deadlines imposed for PUD's. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density. This classification allows single dwellings on small lots, double dwellings, town houses and mobile homes. 2. Zoning: R -2 double dwelling. The R -2 zone allows single dwellings on 60- foot -wide, 7,500- square -foot lots and double dwellings. 3. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre 4. 5. Proposed density: 14.5 people /net acre Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 30 -8 (f) (7 ) states that "double - fronting lots shall not be permitted except where topographic or other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable. Such double-frontage g lots shall have an additional depth of at least twenty feet in order to allow space for a protective plant screen along the back lot line." (Comment: The existence of the NSP easement over the southern portion of the site justifies the use of double- fronting lots. The site could not otherwise be efficiently utilized for single or double dwelling's. The neighboring property owners are opposed to multiple dwellings.) b. Section 9 -218 states "all newly created lots shall be designed to accommodate a setback of 100. feet from a pipeline:" (Comment: Proposed Gall Avenue should be moved north to provide more building depth for at least Lots Two through Seven, Block Two. If the street is not relocated, these lots would have from between 18 to 25 feet of building pad depth.) Lot 21, Block Two, should be eliminated. There would be insufficient buildable width beyond the 100 -foot setback from the pipeline. Legal The city has held a public hearing and vacated its interest in the subject "park" property. The resolution has been sent to the county for recording. The city has also sent a deed to the county to quit- claim its interest in this property to the property owner. These actions are all that is required of the city for the court to consider a petition for vacation. The law does, however, require the property owner to petition for a court- ordered vacation. The city also cannot participate in the property owner's expense to file petition for park vacation. Environmental 146 The soils are generally well suited for development. 2. There is a wet area in the middle of the site that is proposed for reshaping and excavation for ponding. 3. There are no significant stands of trees on the site. Public Works 1. When Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights #9 was platted, the sub - watershed boundaries for this area were revised. A 4-AF pond shown in the drainage plan (page 13) was shifted to the west of Lakewood Drive making additional ponding in the applicant's site necessary. The city engineer has determined that it would be more efficient to drain the applicant's site, as proposed, to pond west of Lakewood Drive, rather than west along Gall Avenue, as shown in the drainage plan. This revision will have no effect on the outlet volumes shown in the drainage plan for the. next pond downstream - -the 5 AF pond east of McKnight Road. (The drainage plan is not part of the comprehensive plan. Therefore, a plan amendment is not necessary for the proposed revisions.) 2. The pond west of Lakewood Drive must be expanded to accept the additional flow from the applicant's site. D Procedure 1.. Planning commission recommendation 20. City council decision - 3. CDRB approval '1 7 Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Drainage Plan 4, PUD /Preliminary Plat 50 Preliminary Plat (8 1/2 x 11) 6. Excerpt from Soil Conservation Service letter 70 Preliminary Plat (separate attachment) 10 ofte"000 CUM N) E. �REMNEA AAIt. WHITE 8 E A R LAKE s� M. tr war CT. u►. Li 0 M • vt. . t . s 2640 N. 2400 N. i fl E - L CAT1 MAP . 11 Attachment 1 @ (2.) CNWKM C acut (3L)CWPIE AWL (M SSA81 AVE T NORTH ST, PAUL j 19 Q N Lakewood Drive between East Brenner' Avenue and County Road D approved for vacation . r� .'•'tip -' '.. _ `'`,,. � �• ', ' *►. �« 2636.35 — (4 » O • 1' {a :: ?i '�.: • ;•Yi • •,► • •' '► a ♦•• •: _ - 010 O4O ••• •••• • ••. •• •L •• • Rim E5,14T. 4' AV E4L ••' h• •h•• �• • •' ♦ • ; •� • yy � •••• • • T •• • � Wo ROM . ��t • • �� f. �• .T � �••••• }••►• :: • }} f i i •� :••••h• � • , ••• � •;i ��;�i4 : •a t• �• } af•� 07Q :• , . ' � • • : a tea:::'- 4ti:.: :.• • ..:: • Y..� ` • ,.jZ ir;. :: ::: •:•:•Y•:•:•:•ii•} •:�; :� �i :f:�•�;` :l : :•:� :••.l❖••e••,:•:hj•• • :i • �• ••� 1� • �yh '1 °. 0 29 s• an r1�t��� 1 a � � ,: •:.,� .... .., : - • .:;.:: •.:.:.•.. .•t�. = ;1. : -T.. ---. --- °• oio rsc. c , 9•Z U U 2 vacated ark . 7 44 -- . - vACMIh M R � � a• s 6 � ♦ • •• Plat inc ludes the park a =r :J . EAST �' N ' , AVE = LA31 BRE NN£R pond o � , � ,= AVE �, 1 +�'►i mss) !11 ' . a•.,v Cat) %+ Vt - s�) cj zz MAs to 5 27 ay � • p ` �) } �, .. ►: • , • tcs) giro) ss ? Cw) < �4) , 31 « CC �Za 3 2 . _- 3 '�c s O 7 9 °��' m ` 2• • 1 ' 7 • • • �4s) 0 ( 44) tW1 ' s CNI (�s) �s) i) 'op (;.) z I'A C 1 � i (3) C2 +��N►•1 /Al /I K STATES POW LIt CO. ■�t!!l���i�lf�. fool 1OW0015LYN N �s 3 :16 An 16 a . PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Applicant's Site °`-- •" °.•• -� Approximate location of Amoco Pipeline Attachment 2 17 .TY RD D•• •• 0000••• • ••••� X7 i.�n• �+r 7F • r • LYDIA AVE °� ma � '� .�. �- L.�' �l�' -_ ,u "�! `•�• „�► f ti. �� 9M � n y �! -, w i.e. .. 000 .-' ..�.�.� �� _-.+♦ . t 4.:..r��{ '+ �"' `� 'x`. '�•e • -�; ..r.... _.. -... 00 00 10••...•.0000000.000•.00•.• ... •. . .. . ,• ••. 0000• • a•• 00••00`` •1••• 0.000•• 0••0• • 00 •• • - . ..••.....•.••000.0....•.•.. .... ..• •Y•ti0.1•• •••S i ....... . .. - ._ b `. �'lf - 4- '���•� .�: ` H "+� .P > x•. b'7Tvbi IiY v. ... u _ _. 1.. Gr ..c1 r .eu. .J•.n. . MAJOR WATERSHED 01V�IDE_ �� •�•: ` INTERIOR WATERSHED . .,DIVIDES ` '_'�"' PROPOSED STORM .SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER`-= _= :•_.•_: OPEN CHANNEL. STORM WATE STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME " .:4 ,AA i } to .g,,..�, •i.r t 3`.iwati k' �ti ' «:�,;, - DISCHARGE I N C CITY L `p t i. 1. 0 ..• 0 .0•.•... ;; . " .mss gip„ s.�x_ s a ••.........•... •.1 Excerpt from Drainage Plan Attachment 3 11 ♦ r f 0 000 '.00.00'00.••.0000 �:..._ NTER •�:::•::� :�: • S Ta rjr u ti QED —A- ' Z9 J 41 — Oft lie Z/1 v0swr—O t t7; e asement SP/ Pi elAne % lk Robert Tilsen's #9 Tr Robert Tilsen's.Maplewood Hei #11 Preli-minar Plat/PU-D for 18 double dwellin (36 units) and one sin dwellin (approved 7-25-83) Attachment 4 14 4 srA HIGH INAf NO _ 6,94 •ti M as 14 sla • j a _ 10 9 - •• _ double—fronting 1 ots \ a •, a a 5 - 4 3 - ? y „ \ OMW - � - - _� - r•_ � � �- r- _ tor. • r- r- �� -. r -r- - _ - — • � . — ..: J � issue y, � � %VOIF as M. GA i 1 - ti t�ti lti 1 w■■ .0 a llii iiii istaAi ii!!i .W 14 , , 14 irks is4msar isa *ss ssl<t_ ll s. i13 ttf\•_s 3 t 10 2 1 S B 7 t t S 11, 12' -� �.. .as w -&stow .w•. ANO W Flow ` w•w•r 1 .siw .1�•iar ~W ~10 2 - -- wasp fsss .s=:p sss s &as� Knauss .sss� Go T re Go 40 CvROT K !st CIunar C (. OUROT O I. Ounm K AALO'T F ( OuROT N OUVLaT 1 SOT L J� sss sii�•lslssl ' _ � OT K 1s.�ls.iils llssia.�s s�larslis Ad •� •1 �• - •' !s =!!ii isifii liif� iiii llii • Kz,.. sv - -- �� - s is�lil ills !i� �iis!}'lisis is! S'i��' ss_ L ♦ • irr s ?Standard— sized lots PM sctww asssa E.tt =a sass ■ ss� =�rs�ia= .■ aaasA4 a[i go OUMM L � lasssss s �•. isssl�a� i ss aae�l - — - -- —. -- -- -- — — - - - - -- G BE R T T vS uA p , — - . OM HEIGHTS NO• 9 �isll_lisi 100 —foot setback l i n e Location of Amoco Pipeline ,s__siiilisli• 100 —foot setback l i n e Preliminary Plat 15 Attachment 5 Q N s� . .,u . .o • •o - - e i iu c co W W c co w w % %a • Kz,.. sv - -- �� - s is�lil ills !i� �iis!}'lisis is! S'i��' ss_ L ♦ • irr s ?Standard— sized lots PM sctww asssa E.tt =a sass ■ ss� =�rs�ia= .■ aaasA4 a[i go OUMM L � lasssss s �•. isssl�a� i ss aae�l - — - -- —. -- -- -- — — - - - - -- G BE R T T vS uA p , — - . OM HEIGHTS NO• 9 �isll_lisi 100 —foot setback l i n e Location of Amoco Pipeline ,s__siiilisli• 100 —foot setback l i n e Preliminary Plat 15 Attachment 5 Q N by enlarging the trenches. Septic tank absorpt ion fields function well on the Maht omedi soils. However, there is hazard of pollution of underground water supplies and nearby lakes and streams unless sys ems . s designed. Specially designed septic • _ are p Y systems are needed on the Kingsley tank absorption ; sails to overcome the moderately slow permeability. A hazard of s idehi ll seepage may exist on the steeper z g slopes. Vegetation is fairly .easy to establish and maintain where the surface layer is loam. Soi is that sandy or gravelly surface may need to be have a s Y 9 topdre_ se d wi th loamy material to insure su rvi,vAl a f ive cover. The Mahtomedi soils are a good the vegetative . source of sand for construction purposes • ; r Under resent con W Resources: di t i has there are A . s ite. The proposed hydraulic • no water resources an incl c rest i ng two detenti basins that will nutlet to an exi stir:g 18++ RCP. = ,�tinR�3r y and B. � r_!RiRtE'�1'id 3t 2 n�� • osed site should prove feasible The soils of the prop. d development. Erosion potential, if one for the propose is not excess ive considers only s�oi 1 texture � and slop e , • • However sediment control for this site for this sites ' 1 appear that soil may present a problem. It would PP Y excess will be moved f r -om east to west too create a grade site and if I assume rough geode, drainage will follow the exist i.ng pattern which is also ' not ha - west the proposed s ii.t +:.�ir•t a� rl will i�� t east t� f 1. orfr• silt cur•t31r, �1•:31:ia E aril '., ►'_ t r�� 1 _� the pr g - C� '+ t� ': '2 r not a L 1. 1:v w �. C 1 �• IT' c: i•� t �'i r i t Z.r � i _ - � behind any givers silt fence. I a s r, r � i•a i Iia g e pr esent an inconvenience ence to the grading contrac but I - end that g rading begin f rom the east and Rove recommend g • i red as they go. Straw mulch. . West, with the site stabil medium. The will be a suitable temporary stabilization R� u properly nstalled and maintained silt curtain 'use of a Y and be laced lust down hill of should also be required A the grading as it progresses* Excerpt from 6 -29 -87 letter from the Soil Conservation Service 16 n Attachment 6 Page 4 Planning Commission minutes 8 - 3 - 87 D. Preliminary Plat: Maplewood Meadows Secretary Olson discussed the project with the commie ' s s � oners. Bruce Mogren was present representing he applicant 9 PP Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the Maplewood _ P ood Meadows Addition on prel imi nary plat, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions prior to final plat approval: 1. District court approval to release the city p ark 1 y p k and that was previously vacated, subject to retaining a pondin easement v Outiots C through I. g over 2. Any portion of the former park that w i l l be combined to h ed wi th property t o south shall be designated gnated as an outl ot. A recordable deed for each outlot to be transferred shall be submitted tted to the city. The city will record the deed(s) once the tat i P s recorded. A check for the recording g costs shall be submitted with the deed(s). The property owner to receive the deed must agree to accept it, 3. Any of the former park land that is not included i n ' Condition Two must be .combined with the ad 'acent lots to the - i � north. Lot ]ones shall coincide de with the proposed lot lines to the north as much as possible. 4. Redesign the plat for staff approval to rovide for P o at least a 100 -foot setback from the pipeline or provide at least a six -foot berm to protect the homes within 100 feet against the radiant heat from an explosion.. If berms are provided, the homes ma not be constructed within 80 feet of the pipeline. 5. Omit Lot 21 Block Two, if the adjacent acent ark land � P d to the south is not in cl uded. Lots 18 through 20 may be redesigned for double- d w e l l i n g lots, g e 6. The pipeline easement must be clearly labeled ed an ' y d designated gnated on the plat. The easement must be included in the title for effected p roperty , each 7. Submit recordable deed restrictions for each double-fronting r lot to p rohibit access from County Road D. 8. City recording of the previously adopted resolutions y P to vacate Lakewood Drive between Brenner Avenue and County Road D. Recording of these..easements is subject to the submission of the developer ' s agreement to guarantee compliance with the conditions of vacation 9. City engineer approval of the final radin utility, ' g g+ ity. drainage and erosion. co ntrol plans. The portion of the grading 1 an within ' the Amoco and NSP easements m P must also be approved by these respective corporations. The grading plan shall be revised a - s follows. Page 5 Planning Commission minutes 8 -3 -87 a. If . the property owner to the south of proposed Outlot C will receive proposed Outlot C, - then the pond shall be shifted to the north and west to minimize its encroachment on this outl ot. Grading of this outl of area shall also be minimized. b. The pipeline's elevation and location shall be shown on the grading plan, c. The erosion control recommendations made by the Soil Conservation Service in their letter dated June 29, 1981, shall be complied with. d. A skimming device shall be provided at the pond outlet to prevent an oil leak from going downstream. 10. The portion of the plat located east of proposed Lot 21 shall be named "Bellaire Avenue ". 11. Submittal .of a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, to include but not be limited to: a. Enlarging the pond, as directed by the city engineer, west of Lakewood Drive and constructing storm sewer from this site to that pond. b. Construction of all required on —site public improvements. c. Removing the Lakewood Drive street surface north of G a l l Avenue and seeding the vacated right —of —way. d. Replacing the asphalt curb at Brenner Avenue and Lakewood Drive with a concrete curb. e. Adherence to page four of the June 29, 1987. Commissioner Cardinal E. Park Acquisition: the erosion control procedures outlined on Soil Conservation Service's letter dated seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sletten Cave's Neb rayKa Addition Secretary Olson, a ng with a tuber of the parks commission. discussed this propos wit he commission. Commissioner Cardi nal m e approval of the capital expenditure for the purchase of o lots Cave's Nebraska Second Addition and find the propo d acquisiti to be consistent with the city's comprehensive pl . Commi ss i onerAossbach seconded A s-- Barrett, Cardinal, Fiol a, Fis er, Larson, Rossbach, S i gmu nd i k, S l etten. Nay- -Axdah l ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE FOR NOISE CONTROL Endorsed.... Modified ..... Dei ectecl�.„ Date THE -MAPI:Ew40D CITY- COUNCIL HEREBY U.K DAINS'.AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 19--48 is added - as' follows: ".A. Section . Noises Prohibited. , General rohibition. N p No - person shall make or cause to be made any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonabl annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property or affects their property's value. This general prohibition is not limited by the specific restriction of the following g subdivision. B. Horns, audible signaling devices, etc. No person shall sound any audible signaling device on any vehicle except as a warning of danger. (M.S. §169.68)0 co Exhaust. No person shall discharge the exhaust or permit the discharge of the exhaust of any steam engine, stationary internal combustion engine, motor boat, motor vehicle, or snowmobile except through a muffler or other device that effectively prevents loud or explosive noises therefrom and complies with all applicable state laws and regulations. D. Defective vehicles or loads. No person shall use any vehicle so out of repair or so loaded as to create loud and unnecessary grating, grinding, rattling, or other noise. E. Loading, unloading, unpacking. No person shall create loud and excessive noise in loading, unloading, or unpacking any ' vehicle. F. Radios, phonographs, paging systems, etc. No person shall use or operate or permit the use_: or operation . of any radio receiving. set; muscial instrument, . phonograph, Action bar Council:, paging . system,.:: machine, or other: device for: the :production or .reproduction of .sound in a. distinct and. loudly audible manner as to disturb the peace, quiet,-and comfort of any person nearby. Operation of any such set, instrument, phonograph, machine, or other:: device between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a. m. in such a - manner as to be plainly: audible at the property,. line'. - of a the. structure or building. in: ;Which it is ;.located, in'Ahe hallway or apartment- adjacent,, or at! a: distance of 50 feet if the - source is located outside. a structure or building shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section. G. Participation in noisy parties or gatherings. No person shall participate in any party or other gathering of people giving rise to noise, distrubing the peace, quiet, or repose of another person. When a police officer determines that a gathering is creating such a noise disturbance, the officer may order all persons present, other than the owner or tenant of the premises where the disturbance is occurring, to disperse immediately. No person shall refuse to leave after being ordered by a police officer to do so. Every owner or tenant of such premises who has knowledge of the disturbance shall make every reasonable effort to see that the disturbance is stopped. H. Loudspeakers, amplifiers for advertising, etc. No person shall operate or permit the use or operation of any loudspeaker, sound amplifier, or other device for the production or reproduction of sound on a street or other public place for the purpose of commercial advertising or attracting the attention of the public to any commercial establishment or vehicle. I. Animals. No person shall keep any animal that disturbs the comfort or repose of persons in the vicinity by its frequent or continued noise. J. Schools, churches, hospitals, etc. No person shall create any excessive noise on a street, alley, or public grounds adjacent to any school, institution of learning, church or `hospital when the :, noise unreasonably , :interferes with..the working of the institution . .or: distrubs � or unduly:: annoys its occupants or : residents and When conspicuous signs indicate the presence of such institution. Section 2. Section 19-49. Domestic power equipment. No person shall operate -a power :lawn mower, , power hedge clipper, chain saw, mulcher, garden tiller, - edger, :drill; :..or. other :similar domestic r�power maintenance . e_quipment : except between the of - 7:0.0 . a.m. .:.and l 0:0 0 p. m. on any : weekday or between :the, hours of ` 9 : 0 0 . a. m. and 9: 0 0 p.m. , on any weekend or holiday. , Snow removal equipment is exempt from this provision. Section 3. Section 19 -50. Refuse hauling. No person shall collect or remove garbage or refuse in any residential district except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on any weekday or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on any weekend or holiday. Section 4. Section 19 -51. Construction activities. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of any kind of electric, diesel, or gas - powered machine or other power equipment except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on any weekday or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on any weekend or holiday. Section 5. Section 19-52. Enforcement duties. The Maplewood Police Department shall enforce the provisions of this ordinance. The Maplewood Police Department or its members may inspect private premises other than private residences and shall make all reasonable efforts to prevent violations of this ordinance. A. Civil remedies. This ordinance may be enforced by injunction, action for abatement, or other appropriate civil remedy. B. Noise impact statements. The Council may require any person applying for a change in zoning classification or a permit or license for . any structure, operation, ] process, installation. or, alteration or .proj that may be considered a .potential noise source , ao submit, a noise impa statement on a form prescribed by the council. It shall evaluate each such statement and take 1 its evaluation, into account in. approving or disapproving the license or permit applied for or the zoning change requested. C. Criminal penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this ordinance p is, guilty ... of a misdemeanor. -- and.: shall upon conviction, . .be.. subject: to.: a f ine of not more than $700 :`or.:�imprisonment :�for:; term' of���� note :�����to���exceed�'.90.-days, or, �� both - . , :plus, -�� in. either ::.c se ;the � costs :.of prosecution Each act of., violation:, and each .. a ;. - -violations occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication." Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 19 8 7. Mayor. ATTEST: City Clerk ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO COLLECTING ASSESSMENTS The Council of the City of Maplewood does hereby ordain as. follows: Section 1. Chapter 32 of the Maplewood Code is hereby amended by adding the following: action by Council., It Kodified Rejected. Date "Sec. 32 -18. PARTIAL PRE - PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT. Whenever any property owner desires to make partial are- navment of anv assPSSmPnt tr) the city- fnr imnrn- rmmnnt c„rh property owner nas tne rignt to make partial pre - payment of the assessment to the City Clerk at any time until October 1, of the assessment year without assessment of interest on the amount paid to the City Clerk." Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner - - Johnson Plan Amendment. ( Parks Section) County Road B and German Street Parks Commission Sherman- Boosalis Companies, Inc. August 4, 1987 SUMMARY ot:ion by Council: Endorsed Modified Rejecte Dat Introduction The parks commission is recommending that the search area for a neighborhood park at County Road B and German Street should be deleted. Refer to the map on page 5 and the enclosed memorandum f rom the parks director (page 7). Background 10 A preliminary plat application for 12.9 acres of land north of County Road B and east of German Street has been submitted by Sherman - Boosalis Interests, Inc. The single- dwelling development, to be named Parkway Terrace, is proposed for an area designated in the comprehensive plan as a search area for a future neighborhood park (pages 5 and 6) . 2. On July 20, 1987, the parks commission recommended that the city should delete this search area from the comprehensive plan. CommPnt-s The planning staff concurs with the park commission's recommendation to delete this park search area. Neighborhood parks are intended to serve a population of 3000 to 5000 persons within a 1/2 -mile radius of the parks. An estimated maximum of only 668 Maplewood residents can be expected to reside within 1/2 mile of this site. (Refer to the map on page 6.) If the North St. Paul population within 1/2 mile' of this site is included, the park could possibly be justified. However, the parks director would prefer to avoid the joint development and maintenance of a park. The North St. Paul parks director is neutral on this issue -- whatever is decided by Maplewood will be acceptable. North St. Paul has a small park near McKnight and North St. Paul Roads. They also have the P otential of a park east of 6th Street, south of Highway 36. The parks commission believes that, although the Maplewood residents within this search area are farther than 1/2 mile from future Sherwood Park (Cope Avenue and Kennard Street), Sherwood Park will be able to adequately meet their neighborhood park needs. At the time the P arks plan was adopted, Sherwood Park was not anticipated. If it had been, een, the subject area would have been allocated to Sherwood Park. The parks commission also discussed the possibility of changing the planned park designation from a neighborhood park to a mini-park r p k (tot lot) . The four acres north of the Sherman- Boosal i s site were considered. This notion was dropped because most of the ar ' y ds in this area are large enough to provide for the play need's of younger children, because of the noncentralized location of the ros p pective site and because of the planned development of Sherwood Park. Recommendation (at least four votes in favor to approve) Approve the resolution on page 10 to delete the neighborhood ark g p search area at German Street and County Road B from the parks section of the comprehensive plan, Approval is on the basis that: 1. The projected area population is significantly below that desired to support a neighborhood park. 2. The development of Sherwood Neighborhood Park (Cope Avenue and Kennard Street) was not anticipated. when the parks section of the comprehensive plan was adopted. Sherwood Park will be able to adequately serve the neighborhood park needs of the residents in the subject area. 2 REFERENCE Parks The comprehensive plan defines a neighborhood park as havin a service ce area that. should not exceed 1/2 mile, a service area population of between 3000 to 5000 persons and an area of at least five acres. Procedure 10 Planning commission recommendation following a ' g public hearing, 2. City council decision. jW Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Neighborhood Park Concept Map 30. Planned Park Service Area 4. Memorandum from the Parks Director 50 Resolution f . .J P } - 19 vs O z < A z O g RIDG BLVD W ' STAB- Q d 5 4* ] _ � AP Q m 3 � fy r, MAPLE VIE a LOCATION MAP •' Attachment 1 AV N _MAN AY _ RADAT TV AN N ROSEV1000 RY- /�/ AV .• lu MAX M .,.,.. ,(2► - -; SA /NT PAUL POND 28 29 68 !I9 HOLLO AY 2) Pro /VATS STREET W H MAN AV :: (ANSS.4B/ AV) W ° NORTH SA IN T PA UL W Ix Y 9 2 Co > RD (23) 1 li AV R ! PL AV w Z T29N,R22W W Q to ��C't J INf3S7 N A _ W 1 3 2 — te ~ 0 E _ _ HILL RD If PRICE A ti = J OE MONT AV W ~ R m � It SEXTANT z H E[ Fu f '4 P H AV XTAN T AV 0 a Ai R1A IS "ER k G RANDAEW ag AV s CT m VIKING DR Y rt AV 36 AV Knuck le Hood L ilk `E AV COPE Gp LA K » N L AURIE t W _j ,r Y f: w n AN - H W Y Co �I v .. r: . R D Zt arc R AV k ELORIDG AM LOCATION MAP •' Attachment 1 AV N _MAN AY _ RECREAT /pay ° R RI 'f�p►1L "`� N ROSEV1000 RY- /�/ AV .• .,.,.. NORTH SA /NT PAUL 28 29 68 !I9 HOLLO AY ME R ASV � su W '- x 121 >- G Ix Y z Z 2 AV R ! PL AV � ��I��►lC �IE W Q to ��C't J INf3S7 N A _ LAKE — te 0 3 PRICE A ti = o Z w Y LOCATION MAP •' Attachment 1 1 6 w i wa KOHLM, LAI GOAL: I Park/ 3000 Residents and Parks Within 1/2 Mile of Residents • 0 Existin Neighborhood Park and Service Radius le Mini - Parks Proposed Nei Park and Service Radius Future sites are search areas onl %0 1 0000fes cdou 4MOOM As ST. PAUL Park site proposed to be dropped from the compre. hensive plan Count Road B :21 lid '110 is Neighborhood'.1, Park Concept Attachment 2 4 L 1 4 WC not NI 1% 110IN01110 ...... DRAVI 1 . .............. a 36 L P-17 too I .5.0 7161 *SHERREN M ti 10 • 12 to 0 3 2 A PLE .iii . • z t I It water tow 4 0 In -0 .j z 1 AM ' COPE s4ffiat"tw gralamwang So AVE % a U L46 A I.; F- LARK 44 Estimated Service *4 Area Population Of �. }- _ _" ; = �`' 668± persons owl © •~ _ w H•.`: • { < LAURIE 3 7 _5x__ a f IA61 > 'Maplewoodm JUL— SANDHURST Moll elo. Z-0 Z N > %01 7W :XAZZ. T H. 36 36 hway 404.1.49— as— Lud (10 w T" (•) M me J ur I 600 4 % _ Tor to) do •♦ #A111m. d h M Alailese \O 23 11111111b Potential 22 acre ark* North St. Pau Ilk 01 C2 Substantial wetland 1j'13 - 24 area, Permission to x T fill the entire site is unlikel If a &waft portion can be 0 =� ' : filled, it still ma be found to be cost— (01 m ill prohibitive for W Dark purposes 1 '2 ., count K R 9 Sri F_ Nil ric - 4%,, � I - Ill 3 a. ft*. I S jr LOP BURKE Wal 4 " 00 B !. a I A 00 I V, V.. 10 .0 A is A N orth St. Pau 1 does J. - C" 1 *J11 Nor I-' ELDRIOGE not have a defined W7 ro crry OF mooftryv000 /a-29.7 EAW 00 service area radius ME A QOWqPq ■ 0 -, or population for n M1 t ool' , their parks $1.6-13 W:1 Ll 0 5 I's 3 1 1 v—p— F -L- OWWWWW's 7 7r. SHRNIER F F Go AWp. 11 PLANNED 'PARK SERVICE AREA Proposed Parkwa Terrace Development Other potential undeveloped park propert within the park search area Attachment 3 a 4 MEMORANDUM Director f Community Development To : Geoff Olson, o C y p From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks and Recreation Subj Neighborhood Search Area Date July 23, 1987 The.Mplewood Park and Recreation Commission discussed the Search Area for a Neighborhood 'Park in the area bounded by County Road B north to Highway #36 and from the City border at Ariel west to Whi "te Bear Avenue at their July 20th meeting. Motion by Commissioner Hawkins, second by Commissioner Bennett, to recommend to the Maplewood Planning Commission the deletion of the Search Area from County Road B north to Highway #36, and from Ariel west to White Bear Avenue., as a Neighborhood Park Search Area. Motion passed. In making their decision, the Park and Recreation Commission discussed the popu- lation that could be served by a Neighborhood Park and the amount of land that would be necessary for providing a park. Due to the configuration of the land where the present population resides and the Open Space still available for a c - q u i s i t i o n , their decision was that there there was neither space available nor a population sufficiently large to justify a Neighborhood Park. Recommendation It is requested that the P l a n n i n g Commission consider the action of the Park and Recreation Commission to delete from the Comprehensive Plan the Search Area for a Neighborhood Park in the area from County Road B north to Highway #36, and from Ariel to White Bear Avenue. 7 4 Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM - .To: Park and Recreation Commissioners `From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreation Subj: Neighborhood Park Search Area, County Road B To Highway #36 and Ariel To White Bear Avenue Date: July 15, 1987 . Introduction The Maplewood Comprehensive Plan indicates a Search Area for a Neighbor- hood Park in the area bounded from County Road B north to Highway #36 and from City border at Ariel west to White Bear Avenue, Background The question of a Neighborhood Park in the discussed area was brought to the attention of the Park and Recreation Commission in June and July of 1985 when the Hi Development Company requested that their property be used for Light Manufacturing and the southlerly area of their property for double- dwellings. The Park and Recreation Commission at that time went on record as wishing to continue to have a Search Area for a Neigh- borhood Park, At the June 1987 meeting, a housing development for single family homes was presented by the firm of Sherman Boosal i s Company indi- cating thei r recommended configuration for large home sites. A request has also been made to the City Council on July 13, 1987, requesting a F e a s i b i l i t y Study for vacation of an al.l ey -way on Smith & Taylor's Addi- tion to North St. Paul and to proceed with necessary review for a street, water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc.,to extend Cope Street from Craig Place to Ariel, and German Street to Cope, so as to enable property owners to improve their properties. The Council requested staff to update infor- mation and to proceed with a Public Hearing. It would appear that the amount of property available for a Neighborhood Park in a centralized locality i s not feasible. The area that is avail- able continues to be in the northeast corner of the Search Area, which includes one of the City's water towers. The area between the water tower and Highway #36 is owned by Hillcrest Development Company and is zoned for Commercial use. Alternatives 1) Continue to search in the area for property that can be purchased at a reasonable cost for a Neighborhood Park. 2) Recommend changing the designation of Neighborhood Park Search Area to a Mini -Park and continue searching for property. 3 ) Recommend that the area no longer justifies searching for a park. Discussion 1) Finding an area of suitable size for a Neighborhood Park does not appear to be realistic, nor does the population in the area appear to be sufficient to support a Neighborhood Park (Neighborhood Parks are at least five acres, may be up to fifteen or more acres, and will service a population between 3,00i to 5,000 people). 2 ) Consideration could be 9 i ven to purchase of two to five acres for a Mini - Park. Mini -Parks are usually considered specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or a specific group such As tots or Senior Citizens. They are often located in such a reas as apartment complexes, townhouse developments, or commercial centers. 3) Consideration must be given to the location of available property at this time, the population of the area, the zoning and land use, and the size of the present home sites. Recommendation .In reviewing he three alternatives, it is my recommendation that the • g land that i s still Commission strongly consider Alternative #39. From the available for acquisition, the location is extremely poor to those more than one block away, and the people who are in the immediate area have sufficiently large home sites to provide the equipment and play facilities that would normally be in a small Mini -Park. 0 PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City o f Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to delete a neighborhood park search area from the area east of German Street and north of County Road B. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 17, 1987 to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said plan amendment be 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on 1987. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The projected area population is significantly below that desired to support a neighborhood park. 2. The development of Sherwood Neighborhood Park (Cope Avenue and Kennard Street) was not anticipated when the parks section of the comprehensive plan was adopted. Sherwood Park will be able to adequately serve the neighborhood park needs of the residents in the subject area. Adopted this day of , 1987. Seconded by Ayes -- 10 Attachment 5 1 Staff stated that this ormation would proceed to he Planning mmi ' so they are aware t a mini - ark 9 o ss on p i s planned f the area. They will re- view the acquisit on in regard to - the Compr nsive Plan. B) Park Search Area - Count Road B and German S taff displayed map of the proposed deve o ment in this area. a i P The gener a 1 area s residential with the exception being a Nursing Home off White Bear Hillcrest Development property is zoned M -1; the area next to their property is zoned R -2 (residential multiple-dwelling A water tower is also situated in this area. B The Park and Recreation Commission discussed the population that could be served by a Neighborhood Park, the Open Space available for acquisition and the amount of land that would be necessary for providing a park, Commissioner Piletich MOVED that the Park and Recreation Commission recom - mends continuing to leave the area as a Search Area in the Comprehensive Plan for a Neighborhood Park; second by Commissioner Christianson; Ayes: Commissioners Piletich and Christian y Christianson; Nayes: Commissioners Brenner, Chegwyn, Schneider, Bennett and Hawkins; Motion defeated. Commissioner Hawkins MOVED that the Park and Recreation Commission recom - mends deleting the Search Area for a Neighborhood Park in the area from ounty Road B north to Hi hwa 36, and from Ariel to White Bear Avenue from the omprehensive Plan; second by Commissioner Bennett; Ayes: Commis sioners Hawkins, Bennett, Schneider, Chegwyn and Brenner; Nay es: Commis - sioners Christianson and Piletich; Motion carried. 9 ) NE US I NESS - None 10) COMMIS ON REPORTS Commissi er Schneider expressed her satisfaction with t he ,.pse of the ball - fields at Berton Park, Commissioner nnett commented on all the . undeveloped arks in Maplewood. P p He requested an up to on Playcrest Park. (Staff stated the Park Department did the desi n f Playcrest Park Public Work g Y and the Works Depar ent was requested to do the rveying and construction drawings - their pre nt workload has made the unavailable able for this proj Staff will r � � unava P Ject. request hir ng consultants to do t construction drawings.. Staff also noted that t Geranium trail � be com leted when school p er temb . ) starts in Se P Commissioner Schneider MOVED hat the lark and Recreation ' ion Commission recommends that the City Council approve a use of PAC Funds to hire consultants to wor on n ineering drawings for the evelopment of PIaycrest,Sherwood Geranium and Hazelwood arks second by Co issioner Hawkins; Ayes: All. Commissioner Piletich recommended th the Park an • d Recreation Commission con- tinue to pursue buying park l and prior o development of the e areas ; the pri would be more reasonable and would also low more time to develop ark p lan . He requested an update oaf K h P P p o lman Park. (Staff sai d the f abri had been installed on a back • stop; more repair work �s necessary before it. completion. Water lines c tinue to be installed on County Road C. To -date nothing has been done on a trail extension or infield.) e d.) Staff stated that top priority proj for the main Y P J Hance crew are the entrance off Frost Avenue into Gloster Park, installation of pl round equip ment at Four Seasons: -Park and the q P trail l and infield i e 1 d at Kohl man rk . Trees w i l l be planted at Kohl man Park depending upon the water tab 1 e -th i Fall r. The. response letter from Engineer Ken Haider was noted re and . � oner Christianson stated that he was thoroughly g g County Road C. Comm" P.ireworks si im resse with the Jul 4th Display, Y P y Commissioner Brenner-di the trail plans for Battle Creek Park,: MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 1987 7:30 P.M. I. CALL TO DER Chairman Fi cher called the meeting to or r at 7:30 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioner Le er Axdah 1 Absent Commissioner Rich rd Barrett Present Commissioner Robe Cardinal Present Commissioner Sue Fi la Present Commissioner Lorrai Fischer Present (Chairman) Commissioner Dennis L rson Present Commissioner George Ro sbach Present Commissioner Marvin Sig undi Absent Commissioner Ralph S1ett n Absent III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. August 3, 1987 Commissioner Rossbach oved ap roval of the minutes as submitted. Commissioner Barret seconded Ayes -- Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach IV. APPROVAL OF AGEND Secretary Olson tabled Item 8A.— Alle Vacation: Between Fenton, Walter and Gor on. Commissioner Rossbach moved approval of e agenda as amended. Commissio r Barrett seconded Ayes — Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fisch r, Larson, Rossbach V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Plan Amendment: Parks Plan Ruth Nickelby Lang, who lives on German Street, requested that the name of German Street be changed due to the problems of being confused with Germain Street. r • Page 2 Planning Commission minutes 8 - -87 Mario Cocch i arel l a, a partner in Sherman -Boosa l i s who is developing property on German Street, requested the house on the North St. Paul side of German Street be changed from a double - fronting lot. Commissioner Rossbach moved approval of the resolution to delete the neighborhood park search area at German Street and County Road B from the parks section of the comprehensive plan. A pproval is on the basis that: 1. The projected area population is significantly below that desired to support a neighborhood park. 2. The development of Sherwood Neighborhood Park (Cope Avenue and Kennard Street) was not anticipated when the parks section of the comprehensive plan was adopted. Sherwood Park will be able to adequately serve the neighborhood park needs of the residents in the subject area. Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes -- Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Rossbach VI. VISITOR PVSENTATIONS VII. COMMUNICATIONS VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Alley Vacati Between Fento Walter and Gordon Tabled until a late date. B. Conditional Use 4rmit: )�60 Co. Rd. 6 (John Glenn Jr. High) Brian Buchmayer, Di recto Business Affairs for School District #622, Bill Martin, architect f o the project, and Dave K i ewatt, Special Education Administrator o district #916, were present and discussed the project with the co i ss ' oners. Bill Gallagher, 2125 azelwoo Avenue, discussed the past problems with flooding he ha experience on his property. Commissioner Card* al moved adopts n of the resolution approvi the building addi do to John Glenn Jr. High School, based on the findings required by ord' ance and subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence o the site plan, unless change is approved by the city's commu i ty design review board. ogle 2. No gr i ng, paving or building permits hal 1 be issued until construc on contracts have been signed for he development of a new sto sewer system, or until on -site ponding is provided that limits the rate of discharge to current levels. AGENDA # MEMORANDUM TO: Ma and. Cit Council FROM-* Cit Mana RE: 1988 Bud DATE: September 9, 1987 Action b C6Un0jj: Endorsed..... Modified....... Rejected. Date The 1988 Bud was distributed to the Ci t C on September 4� 1987i, At the. last meetin a special Council meetin was scheduled to review the Bud in detail on September 21s 19879 startin at Noon, It 1's recommended that a public hearin be scheduled for October 5, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council'Chambers to review, the 1988 Bud MAM : 1 n A Number _l-,-5 AGENDA REPORT Act-".Ir�)n b Counc---`L1,* TO: Cit Manager Endorsed- FROM: Assistant Cit Engineer Modified. SUBJECT: Edgerton - Roselawn Storm Sewer ]Re- Cit Project 85-08 Dat Expand Stud for Markford Addition DATE: September 8, 1987 INTRODUCTION Attached is a petition from the developer of the Markfort Addition to expand an existin feasibilit stud of the storm sewer in the Edgerton - Roselawn area to include the draina and pondin re in his development. Council approval to expand the stud area is re BACKGROUND The ori stud was council initiated. to investi the draina and pondin problems at the Ed ponds between Riple and Roselawn Avenues, The outlet for these ponds is throu the pond located at the Maple Hills Golf Course at Parkwa Drive and Larpenteur Avenue and eventuall pumped from this pond into Round Lake, The Markfort Addition preliminar plat was approved b the council for a phased development approach. The first phase is approximatel one- half the platted lots with an on-the-plat pond without an outlet. The second phase cannot be final platted until an adequate pondin s with a storm sewered outlet is constructed. This outlet drains from the Markfort Addition to a pond on the south side of Roselawn Avenue at DeSoto Street and then throu an existin storm sewer in Belmont Avenue to the Edgerton ponds, The.proposed report would stud the feasibilit of constructin the s from the Markfort Addition to the existin s in Belmont Avenue. The estimated cost of this additional report is $3,000, ALTERNATIVES 1. Order the expansion of the existin stud to investi an outlet and pondin s to serve the Markfort Addition, 2. Order a new feasibilit report to stud the outlet and pondin s and re the developer to escrow 150% of the report's preparation cost to guarantee pa of the costs if improvements are not ordered* 3. Reject an expansion of the feasibilit report until the ori report is complete. 4. Reject the expansion and cancel the preparation of the ori report, DISCUSSION If the council decision is to continue with the development of the area, Alternative Two would be consistent with past Policy within the cit Alternative One would be expandin the ori stud which was council initiated. Re the developer to escrow for the stud under Alternative One would not be consistent with the report's intent to stud the entire draina s Alternative Three would, in effect, table the decision on Phase II of the Markfort Addition until the costs and procedures for construction on the Ed Ponds outlet are known. The hi water in the Edgerton Ponds is such that add additional flow to the ponds should be avoided without considerin an outlet completed to Round Lake. Alternative Four would can both studies. Under this option, it is recommended that all de in the area be limited to run-off at undeveloped rates and volumes, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council adopt Alternative Two which orders a new feasibilit report contin upon the developer escrowin $4,500.00 to guarantee preparation costs, she undersigned, do hereby petition the Council'-of the Ci ' ty of .ti 1 e w o od to: Consider the storm sewer project necessary to allow development of m p rop e rt y Yp � y into single family lots, and that the said improvements be undertaken b ' the city t council 1 i Y y n accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 • an P , d that the cost thereof be assessed against benefited property as provided by sai d Chapter 429. I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed improvements were discussed with the signers. , Date Petition onsO RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to expand the feasibilit report of the Ed ton.-Rose lawn Storm Sewer, Cit Project 85-08, to include the outlet and pondin s to serve the Markfort Addition and to assess the benefited propert for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That the proposed improvement be referred to the cit en for stud and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advisin the council in a preliminar wa as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended, 6 2. That said report shall not be prepared until the project petitioners establish an escrow with the cit e to 150% of the estimated report preparation cost. The escrow amount shall be $4,500 and shall be refunded onl upon orderin of a project, A Number AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: Assistant Cit En SUBJECT: Southlawn Avenue (Beam Avenue to Count Road D) Cit Project 85-17 Order Public Hearin DATE: September 8, 1987 0 o-, -I -,, c , , . 0 "Cl la ;,-, , I by Endorsed. Modif ied Rej ecterl Date The final copies of the feasibilit report with a staff report are bein finalized and will be available for Thursda jc A Number AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: Assistant C SUBJECT: Me Street Cit Project Order Public DATE: September 8, t En Water Main (Bush to Minnehaha) 85-13 Hearin 1987 0 Action b Council, Endorsed Modif-ied..,.-. Re ected- Date The final copies of the feasibilit report with a staff report are bein finalized and will be available for Thursda meetin 3c A Number AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: Assistant Cit En SUBJECT: Street Li Petitions DATE: September 8, 1987 INTRODUCTION V Action by Councilb Endorsed.....-... Modif Re. ecte Date Attached are two petitions to install street li at Skillman and Bradle and at Frisbie and Atlantic* Li at these intersections is not justified based on traffic needs as re b cit polic The areas, however, are q uite dark and the residents wish to have li installed. The residents re that the council consider this issue, BACKGROUND Each installation would probabl re two street li Northern States Power Compan will install, own and maintain the li at a cost to the cit of $12.70 per month per street li This monthl char would be for as lon as the li is in use. There is no installation char for the initial construction and no additional ri or easements re The four li would cost the cit $610 per y ear* ALTERNATIVES 19 Order the installation of the street li and incur the costs in the bud 2e Reject the installation of the street li based on past cit polic 3* Order the installation of the street li after the creation of a street li utilit which would bill each resident within 150 feet of.a street li on a q uarterl y basis, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Alternative 3 be investi The residents feel that street li are necessar in their nei however, street li costs to the cit are steadil increasin The investi of the utilit approach could possibl be accomplished next sprin dependin on staffin and project assi BUDGET IMPACT The cit bud $104,840 in 1987 for street li and traffic si The $610 for the four li re b these petitions could be incurred within this bud however, the precedence set b this action would re dramatic increases over the next few y ears, jc We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the Council the City of Maplewood tQ: 1�'Jher'e O � and that the said improvements be undertaken b the city ' y ty council in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statut Chapter 42 9 • P and that the cost thereof be assessed against benefited property s provided b Chapter 429, Y P y said w M Street Addrana T_on = 1 T1e�• o%%* ; w%A- Fronta a Date � L L '/VA. i -/G" 6 j ' S Date � i��tion_Sponbor zz�. 25 I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed improvements were discussed with the sign ex We the enders i ned do hereby petition t i on the Council 1 of the City t y of - '- g y P 0 and that the said improvements be undertaken by(.tXe city council in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed against benefited property as provided by said Chapter 429. Owner Street Address Legal Description Fr Date BIC- 4 E" 'q/ CIO 11 ' r _ c� - 9 7 v� 2 I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures and the props ed improvements were discussed with Mt e signers. Date Petition Sponsor A Number T- q AGENDA REPORT Action b Counc TO: Cit Mana Endorsed FROM: Assistant Cit Engineer Modified ied... SUBJECT: Beam Avenue Water Main . ReJ ected..... Cit Project 84-12 Chan Order 1 Date-- - DATE: September 9, 1987 INTRODUCTION The casin pipes under Hi 61 that were to be used for the water main crossin for this project cannot be used as ori planned. The casin pipes were installed in 1981 as part of the sewer project to west Beam Avenue. The 1981 casin contractor attempted the crossin three times prior to achievin a casin pipe that was acceptable for sanitar sewer construction. It was determined in 1981 that one of the first two casin could possibl be used for a 12-inch water main crossin Upon investi with the water main contractor, 'it was discovered that the 12-inch pipe would not fit throu the casin A revision is bein investi to install an ei water main in each casin to attempt to e the flow of the one 12-inch main. The contractor and en are investi this option. The alternative is to attempt an entirel new casin pipe crossin for the 12-inch main. A complete report on the situation will be available for Monda council meetin with a recommended chan order so the contractor can continue operations. jc T o August 31, 1987 Mi chae -1 McGuire, City Manager 1830 East County Road .6 Maplewood, MN 55119 Dear Mr. McGuire: Action by Council.. Endorsed.. Modified, Re J ected.,,, „ Date I would like to appear before the City Council at the September 14th meeting to discuss a drainage problem I have been experiencing at my property at 2620 Carver Avenue and to request City assistance in deal- ing with this matter. I have enclosed eight packets of information which I would appreciate your disseminating to the Council members. If you have any questions prior to the meeting please call me at 935 -8474. Si n r ly, r 7 James D. Kerrigan 2620 Carver Avenue St. Paul, MN 55119 a. 390.24 I 'fi . . .. .. .. /•, .0, ole O _. �O. 10� 00" pro 0 ,0 000P %o /0'S2 "� 79.9 _ C ,> 32 05 �o �� . • - 56 977.94 A// °/0'52 "W 12. 05 66.4 9 - (/f ' _ _•_ 220. y s /01 �� o s zz 622.52 � si 0 io 1 52 1 46 Ila1 %L ,.,.n�� Al / 008 , 04 ',, w ,s '7 3g 4 57 N� oB o9 �3 04 /40. �. / �� Q) � 175.40 3p oo �s ? oo,� cr 5 / 0 0 1 Was � W d �b• . �_ .. .. ,v, 08 09 w 352 d -�_ X60 00 =I Al I ° 08' 09 fit/ tv fo l Dri" Ara 't/ / 06 6 74f 95 - • - I August 31, 1987 To The Honorable Mayor & Council of the City of Maplewood: .In early 1984, I purchased a vacant piece of property in the southeast corner of the City of Maplewood (2620 Carver Avenue). This lot is part of the Carver Lake Estates Subdivision which contains a City easement for d.raina e g purposes. Prior to executing the purchase agreement, I met With the City to discuss the easement and determine if there was any major run -off problems in this area that might be difficult to address. From the information I received it seemed there was nothing of any major concern. After completing my purchase, I began the process of constructing a 400 foot gravel access road into the interior of the site. Fifty feet of the road immediately off of Carver Avenue was to cross the easement (see attached map). During the planning stages of this project, I again talked to the City to determine any permit requirements and how to deal with crossing the easement. I was told that I could not obstruct water flow and that this could be accomplished by installation of a 28 inch culvert. At the time I secured a permit from Ramsey County for access onto Carver Avenue. Their staff also agreed the 28 inch culvert was adequate based upon the Maplewood drainage plan. It was not until the summer of 1986 that I began to experience problems. Following a fairly heavy snowfall in April, the small creek running through the easement swelled to ,approximately 30 to 40 foot wide , flowing over the road, and washing out a large section of the road located within the easement. I reconstucted this area incorporating a number of measures to improve stability including a 40 foot retaining wall on the downstream side. In July the same section of road was again washed out to even a worse degree than had occurred previously. In undertaking the repair, I intensified the stabilization measures performed in April. Following another washout in .September, I decided to undertake a number of major improvements to the design. Two 12 inch culverts were installed, the retaining wall was substantially upgraded and 30 tons of limestone rip -rap were added to stabilize the banks of the road. Although I felt comfortable that I would have no more problems, the July 23, 1987 storm undermined all my Work. During this storm, the creek swelled in a very short time period to over 60 feet wide, flowing with such intensity over the road that the two new culverts, the entire retaining wall and all of the rip -rap (many pieces of Which were 12 inches in diameter and weighing close to 100 pounds) were completely washed downstream. Along with this damage, several tons of silt were washed from upstream and deposited on my property. Because of the uniqueness of the July storm, if this had been the only time I had experienced a problem, I would have not complained. However, the previous washouts seem to ,indicate there is a drainage problem of a greater magnitude than originally suggested by the City. Shortly after the last storm, I met with representatives of the City Engineering Department to discuss the problem I have been encountering over the last year. During a site visit they agreed that the amount of water flowing through the easement appeared to be much greater than originally anticipated. The Maplewood drainage plan details a maximum water flow at my -property of 5 CFS (cubic feet per second) on a ten year event rainfall, , However, after our meeting, the Engineering Department undertook a study of the drainage .occuring through the easement. From the information they .have now gathered, it appears that the actual flow is around 70 CFS, more than 15 times what is shown in the plan. They further estimated that the July storm produced close to 140 CFS. At the present time I am just totally frustrated with this situation. I even question now if I would have purchased this property if I was aware of the magnitude of the problem. In the past, rather than complain, I have tried to deal with the problem as best I could on my own. I realize it is easy to say that I crossed the easement at my own risk. However, I feel that the City of Maplewood has a certain responsibility to deal with this situation. I built the road across the drainage easement in a manner prescribed by the City. The actual design was built to standards which far exceeded what was required to meet the flow detailed in the drainage plan. If this information is not accurate it should not be my responsibility to completely rebuild to some new standard. Also, by securing an easement for drainage, the City has accepted certain responsibilities. Preventing erosion, maintenance of creek and creek bank, construction of necessary holding ponds, cleaning creek bed of debris, and anything necessary to ensure that drainage is maintained which is not detrimental to the property owners within the area and the residents of Maplewood as a whole. In the case of the subject easement, I am not aware of any maintenance being Performed by the City to date. Nothing has been done to slow the amount and velocity of water down to bring it into closer compliance with the City drainage Plan. At the - present time the Maplewood Engineering Department is working on a design for where my road crosses the easement which will be able to withstand the large volumeof water. At this time I would respectfully request Council authorization for the City to undertake these improvements as detailed. Res tfully submitted, James D. Ker igan 2620 Carver Avenue St. Paul, MN 55119 s August 31, 1987 To The Honorable Mayor & Council of the City of Maplewood: In early 1984, I purchased a vacant piece of property in the southeast corner of the City of Maplewood (2620 Carver Avenue). This lot is part of the Carver Lake Estates Subdivision which contains a City easement for drainage purposes. Prior to executing the purchase agreement, I met with the City to discuss the easement and determine if there was any major run -off problems in this area that might be difficult to address. From the information I received it seemed there was nothing of any major concern. After completing my purchase, I began the process of constructing a 400 foot gravel access road into the interior of the site. Fifty feet of the road immediately off of Carver Avenue was to cross the easement (see attached map). During the planning stages of this project, I again talked to the City to determine any permit requirements and how to deal with crossing the easement. I was told that I could not obstruct water flow and that this could be accomplished by installation of a 28 inch culvert. At the time I secured a permit from Ramsey County for access onto Carver Avenue. Their staff also agreed the 28 inch culvert was adequate based upon the Maplewood- drainage plan. It was not until the summer of 1986 that I began to experience problems. Following a fairly heavy snowfall in April, the small creek running through the easement swelled to approximately 30 to 40 foot wide, flowing over the road, and washing out a large section of the road located within the easement. I reconstucted this area incorporating a number of measures to improve stability including a 40 foot retaining wall on the downstream side. In July the same section of road was again washed out to even a worse degree than had occurred previously. In undertaking the repair, I intensified the stabilization measures performed in April. Following another washout in September, I decided to undertake a number of major improvements to the design. Two 12 inch culverts were installed, the retaining wall was substantially upgraded and 30 tons of limestone rip -rap were added to stabilize the banks of the road. Although I felt comfortable that I would have no more problems, the July 23, 1987 storm undermined all my work. During this storm, the creek swelled in a very short time period to over 60 feet wide, flowing with such intensity over the road that the two new culverts, the entire retaining wall and all of the rip -rap (many pieces of which were 12 inches in diameter and weighing close to 100 pounds) were completely washed downstream. Along with this damage, several tons of silt were washed from upstream and deposited on my property. Because of the uniqueness of the July storm, if this had been the only time I had experienced a problem, I would have not complained. However, the previous washouts seem to indicate there is a drainage problem of a greater magnitude than originally suggested by the City. Shortly after the last storm, I met with representatives of the City Engineering Department to discuss the problem I have been encountering over the last year. During a site visit they agreed that the amount of water flowing through the easement appeared to be much greater than originally anticipated. The Maplewood drainage plan details a maximum water flow at my property of 5 CFS (cubic feet per second) on a ten year event rainfall, However, .after . our meeting, the Engineering Department undertook a study of the drainage occuring through the easement. From the information they have now gathered, it appears that the actual flow is around 70 CFS, more than 15 times what is shown in the plan. They further estimated that the July storm produced close to 140 CFS. At the present time I am just totally frustrated with this situation. I even question now if I would have purchased this property if I was aware of the magnitude of the problem. In the past, rather than complain, I have tried to deal with the problem as best I could on my own. I realize it is easy to say that I crossed the easement at my own risk. However, I feel that the City of Maplewood has a certain responsibility to deal with this situation. I built the road across the drainage easement in a manner prescribed by the City. The actual design was built to standards which far exceeded what was required to meet the flow detailed in the drainage plan. If this information is not accurate, it should not be my responsibility to completely rebuild to some new standard. Also by securing an. easement for drainage, the City has accepted certain responsibilities. Preventing erosion, maintenance of creek and creek bank, construction of necessary holding ponds, cleaning creek bed of debris, and anything necessary to ensure that drainage is maintained which is not detrimental to the property owners. within the area and the residents of Maplewood as a whole. In the case of the subject easement, I am not aware of any maintenance being. performed by the City to date. Nothing has been done to slow the amount and velocity of water down to bring it into closer compliance with the City drainage plan At the.pesent time the Maplewood Engineering Department is working on a design for where my road. crosses the easement which will be able to withstand the large volumeof water. At this time, I would respectfully request. Council authorization for `the City to undertake these improvements as detailed. Res tfully submitted, James D. Ker igan 2620 Carver Avenue St. Paul, MN 55119