The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987 08-10 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday,,August 10, 1987 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 87 - 16 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. Final Plat : Cave's Nebraska Addition 3. Final Plat : Hasse Addition 4. Final Plat : Huntington Hills 2nd Addition 5. Time Extension : Carver Heights Plat 6. Senior Citizen Deferment - Water Service District No. 6 Imp., City Project 86 -03 7. Change Order No. 3 - Water Service District No. 6 - City Project 86 -03 (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M., Frost Avenue -_. Assessment Hearing - Project 83 -01 2. 7 :00 P.M., Tax Exempt Financing - Healtheast, 3. 7:10 P.M., Markfort Addition a. Preliminary Plat b. Rezoning C, Public Improvement Policy, 4. 7 :20 P.M., Cave's Junek Park : Preliminary Plat (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H)" UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1, Building Setback to Pipelines - 2nd Reading 2. Commissions Recognition 3. Council Salaries Ordinance - 2nd Reading (I) NEW BUSINESS 1, Purchase of Mini Park - Nebraska 2. Easement Agreement - Frost Avenue Reconstruction - City Project 83 -01 3. Solid Waste Committee Report 4, 5. 6, 7. Suburban Rate Authority Membership N.A.P,A, Drainage Problem — Leigh Property_ Geranium Trails 8. Rules of Procedure (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2 3. 4, S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT MANUAL CHECKS.. DATED THRU JULY 3 l 9 l 9 8.7 Page: 1 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER AMO U NT VENDOR 1 TEX DESCRIPTION ` 198316 3 s R 07/31/87 20.00 HILL HURRAY PROGRAMS 198395 g 07/31 /87 385.00 EDDIE TOL EN BAND -` -- PROGRAMS j 385.00 • PROGRAMS 198396 07/31/87 1 001 .86 FUN SERVICE - �_- -- - PROGRAMS 1,001.86 1 98NO 0 07/31/87 lyL._.:E_� !lT 1_TI -- 198r1b� 07/ /87 19SM69 07/31/87 9- ?! .2Q MANN STATE -. -T tEAS ENtSE -_ - - - -- UTILITIES 07 1 /8 ? 616.50 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE - 198N80 07/31 /8T 8,587.70 �.$ t N, 8.P TIL.I__T_TES 198NSO 07/31/87 2.50 N.S.P UTILITIES - - 148�l x 03L.0 30 00 198"95 07/31/87 24.00 .-A M. R.P.A OO�lTB11CT__e YM--- - PROGRAMS 154.00 1 98NO 0 07/31/87 lyL._.:E_� !lT 1_TI 198N80 07/31/87 9.76 2.50 N.S.P N.8.P UTILITIES 07 1 /8 ? 2 so N UTILITIES - 198N80 07/31 /8T 2.50 �.$ t N, 8.P TIL.I__T_TES 198NSO 07/31/87 2.50 N.S.P UTILITIES _ - -! 9.8NaQ 0_71.311 r 4r UTILITIES 198N80 07/31/87 123.12 N.S.P 198N80 07/31/87 103.85 N.S.P UTILITIES IES 07/31 130 �6 UTILITIES 198N80 07/31/87 108.06 N H.$.P U T_I �-�-E' -- - 198N80 07/31/87 34.43 N.$.P UTILITIES we UTILITIES 198N80 07/31/87 .3 5.45 - � - $_p N. S . P UTILITIE- UTILITIES 198N80 198N8.0__ 07/31/87 6.26 N.S.P UTILITIES 198N80 -__071311_ OT/31 /87 2E9.57 12.09 A,I N.S.P T T __U IL_I_. L.ES _UTILITIES 19SN80 07/31/87 .288.45 N.S.P _ 1 T UTILITIES 198N80 198N80 07 /31 / 07/31/87 94,37 N.S.P a rl-Lja UTILITIES UTILITIES 07/31 /87 299.44 X 76 59 N.S.P 19iNi• 07/31/87 54.63 N. $� N.S.P --UTI.LLTIE 198N80 07/31/67 9.50 N. $.P UTILITIES 07/31 /BZ 3s 93 UTILITIES 19SN80 07/31/87 72.62 N _Q a N.S.P .0 ?ZLI ? IES UT 198N80 07/31/87 137.16 N.S.P UTILITIES 7Z3.1 / 6 � $� UTILITIES 198N80 07/31/87 ..� 153.24 N.S.P �4l_TLL UTILITIES 3#134.3T l _ Page: 2 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER "TE .- _ T YE NiII _ Z.TE!!. DE 8 CRIPT I0t s P01H71 .07/31/87 E 840.00 HORWATH T CONTRACT PYM 9rM�i9 4 5.0 .-0 0 - BEJ�l1l- E�- -LK.- P01M20 07/31/87 8,975.00 METRO WASTE CONTROL .SAC PBL y 201"20 07/31/87 89.75- METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC P8L 40 .00 * ---- __ -. -_ -_ ti 202D24 07/31/87 07/ sss *s� DEPT NATL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE 1 201M69 07/31/87 5,661.78 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE y L'01M69 - -- - - -- 07/31/87 488.00 _ 60149 - 78 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE 202"69 07/31/87 7,527.76 z 201"9s ;; 3 07/31 /87 100.00 M.R.P.A -- - CONTRACT PYM LICENSE 100.00 • 7 933.26 - --- - - - - -- 9 4 5.0 .-0 0 - BEJ�l1l- E�- -LK.- :9 450.00 * -- J - - DOE 9. Q3_!_311_$ 40 D I MAIN !lM 'DREY L 40 .00 * ---- __ -. -_ -_ ti 202D24 07/31/87 07/ 72.00 DEPT NATL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE 1 1612 00 1)EPT_ lr1ATL .__RESQ.UB DNR_.l-ICEN$E- Q 234.00 -- J 202"69 07/31/87 7,527.76 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE 4 -05, AllN _ STA_TE'__.TREA$.- LICENSE 7 933.26 - --- - - - - -- fl� 202M71 07/31/87 1,395.8E MN ST TREAS SURTAX SURTAX PBL 07/211x7 89 �T— MN S T TREAS S, URTA - .SURT�_. L_— __ 10366.55 • — _ 2 3 203422 07/31/87 .50 ANDERSON CAROLE PETTY CASH 203422 07/31/87 6.30 ANDER _.CAgOLE _ ANDERSON CAROLE .PET.L�__CA$l•L_ PETTY CASH _ 203AEL 07/31/87 9.29 ANDERSON CAROLE PETTY CASH Page 3 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NQ. DAT ^- . -__ -. - _AMOUNL -- __ -- �E!!t0 -QQ 1 TEN -DF.-BCAZPTIO.N. - 203A22 07/31/87 5.30 ANDERSON CAROLE PETTY CASH 2 0 31122 ---- ^203r6��_.- ..2...- l .� -- J�t+IDERI�QW - D of --- PZT -T-Y -- 203A22 07/31/87 .75 ANDERSON CAROLE PETTY CASH 203A22 07/31/87 2.00 ANDERSON CAROLE PETTY CASH 203A22 __ Q?!_ 32187_-- _ - -__- — _ 3 -. :_.____ANDERS0ft.. C.Ait E - PETTY CASH - - -_ 203A22 07/31/87 5.75 ANDERSON CAROLE - -- PETTY CASH 203A22 07/31/87 .25 ANDERSON CAROLE PETTY CASH - - 2 03�A22 - -- n 71-31 ! 2. - - -A ld _ CARol FEE T_ T-Y-..:. CASH -- -- DRIVER LICENSE 45.12 121.00 _ 203C22 07/31/87 12.23 COMM /REVENUE FUEL TAX 20 3 C22 1-9,9. - - -- CO.MM/R.EV IEN UE _ F UF_L-_ _TAX 203C22 07/31/87 8.22 COMM /REVENUE. FUEL TAX 203CRE 07/31/87 10.74 COMM /REVENUE FUEL TAX 203G22_ -._� _071311$Z� _ 1_ 0z C Ol1M /REVENU - FUEL - _TAX____ ' 203C22 07/31/87 .01- COHN REVENUE _______ FUEL TAX 203CE8 07/31/87 T-34 COMM /REVENUE FUEL TAX _ = - -- 203CP_2:.- 07 /3 -tZ pilot� - TAX ` 203C22 07/31/87 13.33 COMM /REVENUE FUEL TAX 203022 07/31/87 12.47 COMM /REVENUE FUEL TAX x.. c MM.LR EV.EN.U E FUEL-J X - 120.48 * I -- -- .2 - 0 4!"18.9: , 07/31 /e 7 MINN RTAI T REAS LICENSE 204M69 07/31/87 169.00 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE 7,636.53 + - -- 204P 07_23iLBT 3 .6000.00 p08 THAST ER -POSTAGE----- 3 3.000.00 • 204P95 07/31/87 45.00 P.E.R.A P.E.R.A POL 203"69 07/31/87 5 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE ---- ^203r6��_.- 03t31L8 329 , 54 _M�1ML�L_ $T TREAS LI -CEN 6.021.75 s ' 203512 r; 07/31/87 82.50 STS NORTH RINK PROGRAMS - a *�ss• 204C40 07/31/87 121.00 CLERK OF COURT DRIVER LICENSE 121.00 I -- -- .2 - 0 4!"18.9: , 07/31 /e 7 MINN RTAI T REAS LICENSE 204M69 07/31/87 169.00 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE 7,636.53 + - -- 204P 07_23iLBT 3 .6000.00 p08 THAST ER -POSTAGE----- 3 3.000.00 • 204P95 07/31/87 45.00 P.E.R.A P.E.R.A POL Page: 4 1 .1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD • CHECK REGISTER �...._ _- CHEF - NOrf. n T AMOUNT VEhiDQR I T.E!!. DESCRIPTION z 3 45.00 • 091 00 M,P.� . - i ELt QOQ_ -_ xM 3 1,091.00 • ` 205M69 07/31/87 5,151.39 MINN STATE TREAS LICENSE 7/31 /AT 432__ -0.0 —� MI NN - ITA TEAS I. I CEN 5,583.39 • 2OSP95 07/31/87 7,775.58 P.E.R.A PERA POL ------ _- ._2Q5Pl 07/31 /B7 � � m 31 6 33 P E - _R A PER A PBL _ id, 091 .9.1 • . 208397 - 07/31/87 34.00 34-00 LEMIRE CHERYL REFUND *s * * *s 20SA05 9 07/31/87 422.40 AFSCME 02725 UNION DUES _ 422.40 5 � 20,364.50 _ UNION a " 208115 e8 I 1 c 07/31/87 -D-T13 � i�� 4014.08 i -1 .3L ICMA I-CI�- P/R DEDUCT p � e 5,895.34 + > ,FD IC- T z 808M15 07/31/87 5,416.48 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL - - -- - 2- 0811 - - 0U�31 87 15..5 3.. 2T t- MA PLEWOOD ST ellhtK FuT .B BL 208M15 ' 07!31/87 287.50 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK SAVINGS BONDS 1 20dM15 - -- 07/31/87 5,416.48 26.64= 73 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FWT PBL s* ** *s 208.M18 07/31/87 14.00 METRO SUPERVISORY UNION DUES 14.00 • Page: 5 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER -___- CI•tECK . DAT AMOUNT VENDOR ___I_T Elrl_ DESCXLPT 10h 3 311.70 • _ 20$!!61 QT /3 1 b O -Q.L !'� �TUAL_. - LIFE INS INSURANCE_ a 160.00 • ' 208M65 07/31/87 7,594.43 MN ST COMM /REVENUE P/R DEDUCT - - - -,.— -7- SSA -4.3_ 20SM68 07/31/87 110.84 MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP 208M68 s 07/31/87 46.16 MN ST RETIREMENT DEFERRED COMP -- 1 57 00 • 808M69 07/31/87 7 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 2 0 7/ 31/ 87 07/ 306 lloLlk.. &a LIC EJtSF.-- 3 7,316.81 + 208N95 — _ 07/31/87 253.92 S53 SE • MUTESON LAVERNE TRAVEL TRAINING # #•••# J . 208R10 2 07/31/87 144.00 RAMSEY CNTY COURT AMD RUNS 208R10 — 07/31/87 16.00 160 - • RAMSEY CNTY COURT AMD RUNS 2084125 07/31/87 144.15 WI SC DEPT OF REV SUPPLIES 144.15 • _ *ii•ii - 2 .. - - -- 20$wSQ_ 0 71311 87 _ 230-70 - WEBER-ZRO 230.70 • 209044 07/31/87 39.80 F&L CONSTR BLDRS DEV REFUND E090.4 --- 07/31 .- /87 ' 4 00 F.&L-- _CON$.T1t._BL.DR8 - .D EV____ 209044 07/31/87 384.00 FEL CONSTR BLDRS DEV .REFUN REFUND 209044 - 07/31/87 326.00 1_a24 120 • F &L CONSTR BLDRS DEV REFUND 2 209M69 07/31/87 9,461.04 MILAN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 209M69 07/31/87 446.50 MINN'STATE TREASURER LICENSE Pa 6 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER ___Vv ND On _I_TEft DESCRIP CHECK NO - . DATE-- _A"OultT 9.907.54 210400 No STAR_ BOOKS 210400 07/31/87 572.00 NO STAR RISK BOOKS 1,716.04 210 D24 DEPT. *ATL- RESO UNR LIC 21OD24 07/31/87 36.00 DEPT NATL RESOURSES, DNR LIC 191.00 62,302 12 _LAS _-REHREI N INC CONTRACT PYt 62o302-12 BIOM69 07/31/87 7o826.72 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 21 -3-14-00 ___.NlNk...STATE_ TREASU`ftFJt__ SlI60.72 • 211398 07/31/87 200000.00 BULK SERV CORP CONTRACT PYt 204000.00 211399 07/31/87 180.00 C&N.W.TRANS CONTRACT PYt 180-0-0 211 C40 07/31/97 95.50 CLERK OF COURT DL FILING Fa 95.50 • 2.1 I M6 9----ITZ3-1-187 TATE.. TREASURER___ - .L_ICENSE 21IM69 07/31/87 135.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 8, 080.50 -7 1 21221 a— 07/31 Z87 1 . f 4 l 2 _A.AXE__AREA__UTIL -- C0NT8ACT_._ P_Y 16,451 .26 2 eleBoa 07/31/87 13o101-82 C.M.BARRY CONSTR 1-3-4-LOL IL - 82 CONTRACT PY Pa 7 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER .- - - - -- CH_ECK,_dI'l_,L_ DATE A!'lQ No -I TE? - DESCRIP 4.3 2.121% - 3 f-/•&7_ 538. -84- XINK STATE TR ] EASI s 212M69 07/31/87 9,441.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE 9,979.00 + �` 9 169, 865.59 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL ` - 22�! . _A.5 F— lima- 03-- "TA.L-- -- HYII1 AlilT- CHIi1RCE_ . , 326.00 FUND 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMEN' 20, 000.00 FUND 33 TOTAL 81 -E0 MCKN I CH T/I FUND -.38_. TOT 8 _ BEAVER__ CRK �� 6g, 482. f P FUND 63 TOTAL 86 -3 CENTURY AVt . r 16x451.26 FUND TO TOTAL 86 -12 ARKWRIGHT F ljhln. 90- TOT .- S.AX_LTA&Y_.SEWER_J ' 1T 560.29 FUND 95 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT .s 120.48 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE i EQUIP . : 23 - pt+ � 302, f ?3.39 TOTAL �b 29 E 32 •S 1 .g, L l J ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATED 8-10-87 Pa 1 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION - _ 222018 _.___ 2220 �_ 07/29/87 0787 10.00 JUKER FRAM - TRAVEL TRAINING 14 I-L EA GE, 20.19 7 Ee2019 7/ 30/87 1 5. 0 0 0 — MCFO A A L CHESLEY MEMBERSHIP 8 Is.0 0 P-2203T P.P.2037 07/30/87 07/30/8T 9!1 S. 00 les.00 MINN TITLE CONTRACT PYM 4 00.00 1 - '-' MINN TITLE- CONTRACT- P E22046 07/30/87 163-74 GOODYEAR REPAIR MAINT 163.T4 2E2069 07/30/87 9.00 U 8 WEST 1 9.00 • RENTAL 7 25 00 &NEJRl-CAWJWT"A ATE 25.00 07/30/87 4.00 BATHKE CO SUPPLIES 4.00 5 252150 07/29/87 25.00 EMER MEDICAL SERV MEMBERSHIP 25.00 07/30/87 6.29 NORTHWOOD HDW SUPPLIES 6. 8! 97 .07/3 0/87 00 - SHISEK MYRA PROGRAMS 16.00 E22216 iale . 2,81-6 07/30/87 97/3-0 94. 4 COTTER CHGE CARD SUPPLIES 222216 07/30/87 37.19 18 .39 COTTER--C.N-GE CARD CARD -8--U F - I E 222216 07/30/8? 39.85 COTTER CHGE CARD COTTER CHGE CARD SUPPLIES 222216 07/30/87 07/30/04� 10.70 COTTER CHGE CARD — C' -- 'H -- 'C'E SUPPLIES $UP PLIES 21•96 C 0 T T lEt C A * 0 SuPpi ' 152.93 Page: 2 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHECK__N0..___0ATE _ _ AMOUN VENDOR IT EM DES 000000 222370 07/30/87 8,E0o.00 MIDWEST FENCE b MFG. EQUIPMENT 222370 0 7/30/87 5 650. 0.0 _MIDWEST FENCE_ i _MFG, EQUIPMENT _._._ . 282371 _ _ - _---- _5.7. 34f8� Psg . 04 NE. .WPOR -- CITY _ C ONTRACT �PYM- 2se.00 « 222372 _ _ 07/30/8T 98.40 NORTH8IDE RV _INC EQUIPMENT 198.00 * --- - - - - -- 222373- 6.0-0 ESON REFUND a 222374 _ _ 07/30/87 3,96 PIPE SERVICES CO CONTRAC PY M 0 7_ /3Q -1$ 6.00 R ANG �T8CHE!'t IL. REFUND - 6.00 « 222376__ 07/30 6.0 SCH IELE NANC REFUND 6.00 * -- _ 8.823 0 12191.60 T . 8 . R . LIGHTING 8VPPL IE i 1,101.60 s _ _222378 07/ 10.00 UNIV OF L TRAVEL TRAINING 8.22379._ 07 f30r87 18.00 JOURNAL._CIVIL_ OEFNSE MEMBERSHI 12.00 « _ - -- 222380 07/30/87 2 0.00 KO OPER_ LU REFUND 80.00 + _. 2EF381 07/ 30/87 6.00 LAND T R EFUND 6.00 « - - - - -_ 222382_ __ _07/30/87 _ 1 2. so MARQUE PLBC REFUND Z 223 83 0 200.00 MCALLI C PYM 200.00 « - 222384 _ 07/30/87 _36 7.30 CA O SEVE S UPPLIES 357.30 0 ---- - - - - -- - - -- -- -- - -- _ 22E385 0 1 COLE _PUB S UPPLI ES 139.00 « 2:22386 _ 07/30/87 6 _ COHR KELL SUPPLIES 6.40 * _ -- - - - -- _._ - - - -- ___ 22238 07/ 30/87 6.00 HEN H SUPPLIES Paged 3 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD tHECK REGISTER NO, DAT AMOUN V NDOR ITCH _QE$CRPrON 6.00 Z22388 " 4 07/30/87 5.43 JORDAN ERIC SUPPLIES 6 S.43 - £22389 3 07/30/81 7.00 AMERICAN RED-CROSS HEPATITA8 TEST 7.00 222390 07/30/87 16.00 ASCHENBRENNER I REFUND - 16.00 522391 07/30/87 12.00 BERON DEBORAH REFUND - -- 12.00 # s 222392 07/30/87 12.00 BRIESE BRUCE REFUND 12.00 2ZA4 07 f S . 61 ADVAN ST SU IE; 3 15.61 « i 222A15 07/29/87 3,264.50 AEC ENGINEERS CONTRACT PYM _ 222A52 07/29/87 32.25 ARDEN SHOREVIEW NOS ANIMAL CONTROL ' 32.25 222A 0 7/30/87 800.00 AMERI - DATA SYSTEM REP AIR MAI 800.00 � -- -- �- 222A69 07/29/87 3T3.63 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT z ZZZA6_ O /8 _ 3_5.73 ARNALS A UTO SERV REPAIR MAIN 46 9.38 * - - - - -- - - -- -- - -._. 222805 07/30/87 40.00— BANNIGAN&KELLY P.A. CONTRACT PYM 222605 07/3 6, BA NN IGAN&KEL LY P.A. C ONTRAC T PYM 222805 07/30/87 1425.00 BANNIGAN&KELLY -P.A. CONTRACT. PYM 222805 07/30/87 18.73 BANNIGAN&KELLY P.A. CONTRACT PYM ... _22Z 07/30/87 f59 00 BANNIGAN& P.A. C PYM 6,666.83 2242911 07/29/87 35.00 BANICK JOHN CANINE ALLOWANCE Page® 4 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER CHEC NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDO ITEM DESCR PT IOiy 3 07/29/87 3s. 00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES o� i 5 ?z 2 22B13 07/29/87 3� 798.16 BART J AME S C - - COPY EQ UIPMENT INC CONT PYM 8: 29.8s 3,7�8F16 SUPPLIES 5! 5' -_ 84.41 '' 222CS9 07/29/87 15 . 00 _ CORPORATE RISK MGM CONSULTING SERV c 222B15 z; 07/29/87 43.75 BATTERY TIRE WHSE SUPPLIES - - 43.75 i 222 C67 3 07/29/87 166.14 t .3 r5 PUBLISHING , 166.14 22 07/29/87 1i,550.00 BOARD OF WATER COMM CONTRACT PYM ''i 222B45 07/29/87 2,271.50 BOARD OF WATER COMM CONTRACT PYM _ 22213 9 07/29/$7 2,376.00 BOARD OF WATER C OMM CONT PYM 197. so ,�. ` 2i 222E66 07/29/87 5.50 EMERG SERV SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 3 ' 5.5 0 3; 222008 , 07/29/87 169.70 C C SHARROW CO INC SUPPLIES 169.70 :6 * * # * ** $i 222C39 191 07/29/87 392..47 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES o� 392.47 ?z 2220 07/29/87 54<. 56 COPY EQ UIPMENT INC S U PP LIE S 22205$ 07/29/$7 29.8s COPY EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES 5! 5' 84.41 '' 222CS9 07/29/87 15 . 00 _ CORPORATE RISK MGM CONSULTING SERV 9' I5#. 00 i 222 C67 3 07/29/87 166.14 CHAP PUBLISHING PUBLISHING 166.14 6 222D30 07/29/87 178.44 DALCO SUPPLIES 8 178.44 2i 222E66 07/29/87 5.50 EMERG SERV SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 3 ' 5.5 0 222E70 07/29/87 E3 EAR I CA FISH MED BOOKS Page - 5 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 3 222K33 07/29/87 700.00 CHECK REGISTER CHECK _NQ-_DAT _.AMOVNT_ V NDSR I'- .IfDE SCR I'T_ION 222L21 222!.21 07/29/87 07/29!87 533.10 LAKELAND FORD SUPPLIES 07!29!87 88,52— 3 3-6 1! LAKELAND FORD SUPPLIES 2C2G2b 07/2 9/87 51.10 CLE WAT ER ER 3 - -- — 51 .10 s s 222!28 07/29/87 35.00 222G57 07/29/87 583.00 GRACE DUANE CONTRACT PYM - - - -- _ s� j 222!85 5 2c2J30 222130 07/29/87 07/29/87 30.00 J&J TROPHIES - SUPPLIES 8 .g22J30 _ _ — 07 /29! 87 30.00 9.0.4. J&J TROPHIES SUPPLIES J J&J T S UPPLIE S 15 0.0 0 OT /29m _ _ -. 222M14 07!29/87 866.40 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW! PUBLISHING 40 « 222M23 07/29/87 15.00— METAL DOCTOR -- - PL I o TlZ� /aT SuPPLiEB 222M23 -- 15.00 METAL DOCTOR SUPPLIES 3 222K33 07/29/87 700.00 KENNA J OHN J _ APPRAISALS - 700.00 222L21 222!.21 07/29/87 07/29!87 186.96 LAKELAND FORD SUPPLIES 07!29!87 88,52— 3 3-6 1! LAKELAND FORD SUPPLIES L A KE LAND FORD SUPPLIES _ 132.06 - -- — Mai• * *♦ s 222!28 07/29/87 35.00 !ANC RICHARD CANINE ALLOWANCE -- 35. 00 • j 222!85 S S r UPPL I OT/29/87 24.77 LUGER LUMBER 2 24.77 • OT /29m 1 v0. op M�A�_�UEEI..+�._EQUIP _8UPPLIE ------ . _ 222M14 07!29/87 866.40 MAPLEWOOD REVIEW! PUBLISHING 40 « 222M23 07/29/87 15.00— METAL DOCTOR -- - PL I o TlZ� /aT SuPPLiEB 222M23 -- 15.00 METAL DOCTOR SUPPLIES 222NSO 07/30/87 102. OS NORTHWESTERN SELF. TELEPHONE 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER ' C H E C K N D ATE AM OUNT VENDOR ITEM bESC R 1 PT I Oh - - 2 ` .3 + 222M23 0T/29/87 15. 0# METAL DOCTOR - -- SUPPLIES - -- 15 . 0 0 � 7 ±. $ 22EM31 07/29/'87 13t.84 MANPOWER TEMP CONTRACT PYM 131-84 " 222M32 222M32 07/29/87 07/29/87 189,04 MAPLEWD SCREENPRNT UNIFORMS `- - 22M ZM 32 --- - - - - 0729l87 42.00 42 .00 MAPLEWD SCREENPRNT UNIFORMS MAPL SCRE ENPRNT --- ---- -- UNIFO 273.00 � - - - - - -- i '' s' 222M48 07/24/87 31516-40 METRO INSP SERVICE CONTRACT PYM 3, 516.40 * 22 ; 43 ; 222M72 07/30/87 10.00 MINN C . F . 0 . A MEMBERSHIP a; 10.0 :_. 222M79 0 7/29/87 73. 03 MN iC FUND AM8 RUNS .9 73.03 1l �z 222M94 07/29/87 3,355.76 M.R.SICN SIGNS '_ -- 2 2 2M94 -- 07/2 9/87 683. M.R SI GN S IGNS 4, 038.86 7 22027 22 27 07/30/87 07/ 30/4 T 197 00 NCR CORP CONTRA PYN - ' 222N27 07/30/87 5 6.58 10.50 —" NCR CORP NCR CARP C ONTRACT PYM 2' 243.00 CONTRACT PYM 222N30 07/30/87 1 40.24 NORTH 8T PAUL C3TY UTILITIES -7 1,403.20 31 3; * # * * ** ' 22EN41 222N41 07/30/87 07/30/8 7 NORTHERN HYD SUPPLIES • 4` . NORTHERN HYD SUPPLIES 3; 127.24 222NSO 07/30/87 102. OS NORTHWESTERN SELF. TELEPHONE Page 7 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER 2 ' 3 ~ °' 6, 8 1O y 2: .` -- ' ;�: • ° 16! ,7 222N50 07/30/87 _D t X34 -- 222N50 47/34/87 222NSO 47/30/87 22N5 47/34/87 222NSO 07/30/87 222N50 07/30/87 222NSO 07/30/87 222NSO 07,/34/87 2 22NS O 4730/87 222N54 07/30,8? 222NEQ 07/30/87 38.94 NORTHWESTERN BELL 38.40 1y dRT11i.lEgTFRi�i 38.90 NORTHWESTERN BELL 38.90 NORTHWESTERN TERN HELL 379.99 NORTH 'ESTER�y HELL 39.00 NORTHWESTERN BELL 18.50 NORTHWESTERN BELL. 18.00 NORTHWESTERN BELL 113.97 NORTHWESTERN BELL 67.95 NORTHW BELL _ 8 # . 80 NORTHWESTERN BELL 53. $7 NORTHWESTERN HELL ERN: BEL 1,171.07 .TELEPHONE TELEPHO IN- TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEP N - - E TELEPHONE TELEPHONE Tyl TELEPHONE ------- TELEPHONE T ELEPHON E _ TELEPHONE TELEPHONE p 2, 222N95 07 /30 /87 6 .00 NUTESON LAVERNE TRAVEL TRAINING ?2: 24 'S' - s 2E8029 2E�029 07/30/87 0T30r87 10.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH - MAINT VEH '- 2 O7 /3+�r8T 20.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH MAINT VEH 'e' ' 222029 07/30/87 25 .00 24.00 OCTQPUy CAR M OCTOPUS CAR MASH l�AiNT Y EH MAINT VEH , 222029 07/30/87 30.00 OCTOPUS CAR WASH MAINT VEH -- t, 339.00 4 222P40 07/30/87 14.83 PHOTOS TO 60 MAINT VEH 6! BEEP40 p +. 222P40 f 07 /30/87 07/30/87 8.18 PHOTOS TO GO MAINT VEH 26.46 PHOTOS TO GO MAINT VEH s' 49.45 J! t ' 2? 222P45 07/30/87 118.00 PITNEY BOWES MAINT VEH 3 c.22P45 07/30/87 66.00 PITNE BODES LEASE 184.00 ..i i 1 31 222R03 07/30/87 95.00 R.L.POLK CO SUPPLIES PROS 222R03 2228 O3 07/30/87 07/30/97' 47.50 R.L.POLK CO � S UPPLIES PROS 4 R . L . POLK CO SUPPL IES PROS 190.00 =' 2 22ROS -- 07/30/87 145.00 RAMSEY CLINIC FEES SERV 145.00 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 222.00 CHECK RESISTER OFFICE PROD CHECK _N DAT AMOUN VENDOR IT DES CRIPTION 3 - 222R 0.9 - - = -- 7/ate --- 03_0 / . _ R.AMB.E C_O: N .CONTRA �T P Ylr l 222RO9 07/30/87 431.33 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM ' 222RO9 07/30/87 230.04 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM - 222- R09..__ 07 ✓30/8 632.62 RAMSE C OUNT Y CONTRAC P Y M 222RO9 07/30/87 57.51 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYPt 222R09 07,/30/87 262417 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM � PROD 1.630,28 3; 222 S03 07/30/87 46.84 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES ` 222203 0 7/30/87 3 222R15 07/30/87 80.00 RAMSEY COUNTY RECORDING FEES 222803 07/30/87 80.00 SPS OFF ICE - PROD OFF I CE - SUPPLIES 462.9 22ER27 07/30 95.84 REE S SERVICE SUPP P 95 .84 * * * * ** 3. 222 R39 r. 07/30/87 26.22 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PROG c22R 07/30/87 10,13 RICH SUP PL_IE_S PROS s 222R39 O7r30 /87 1.82 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PROG- EEER39 OT/30r87 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PRQG '- - - - -F :R39 07/30187 1 5.83: R S UPP LIE S P ROS y' 222R39 i OT/30/87 7.14 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PROS 9; MEER39 07/30/87 19.83 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PROS _ ^ MEER3 4 7/30/87 6.61 RICHA SUPPL IES c22R39 07/30/87 00.48 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PROS - 2E2R39 07130/87 43.07 RICHARDS SUPPLIES PROD 3.; _ 172.07 3. i 5 '! 222R49 07/30/87 434.00 ROAD RESCUE EQUIP 434.00 2� S22S_o 07/ 36.50 S & D LO CK S AFE CHEMICA 3 ' CC2S02 07/30/87 5.50 S 6 D LOCK SAFE CHEMICAL _TOIL TOILETS 4- 42.00 222503 07/30/87 222.00 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES ' 222S03 07/30/87 19.75 SPS OFFICE PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES 222 S03 07/30/87 2.11 SPS OFFICE P OFFICE SUPPLIES 9 222S03 07/30/87 40.32' SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 222803 07/30/87 9.44. SPS OFFICE PROD OFFICE SUPPLIES - -- 22S_0 07/30 ST. 3f SPS OFFICE PROD S 222503 07/30/87 17.52 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES 3; 222 S03 07/30/87 46.84 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES ` 222203 0 7/30/87 10.02 S PS OFFICE_ PROD_ OFFICE SUPPLIES 222803 07/30/87 45. 2E SPS OFF ICE - PROD OFF I CE - SUPPLIES 462.9 Page ° � 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK_ NO. DAT CHECK REGISTER 222883 07/30/87 528. o ; 0 8 1 _ STATE OF MINN TREAS LICENSE FEE 528. 0 222584 07/30/87 35.00 STEEPEN SCOTT 3 CANINE ALLOWANCE 4 ` 35.00 R 2730 / 0 f 4 TAROT: T S PPL PR -- -- -- a . ..... A 2 5 ° 282505 2cES0.5 07/30/87 07/30/87 5 , 09 8 8 T OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES ' - 222SOS 07/3Q/87 2 .118 33.10 S Al T OFFIC 8 C OFF F X E__ S .___ U PPLIES 8 ' 59.17 T OFD' I CE OFFICE SUPPLIES �9 r -- 12_____22280 ' 3 222509 07/30/ 07/30/87 74.00 225. SATELLITE INDUS CHEMICAL TO --- 14: 222EO9 07/30/87 73.0.a SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS ' 2 / SATELLITE - ES CHEMICAL TOILETS 16 "± 222509 222809 07/30/87 07/30/87 73.00 - $ SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMI CAL 3I CHEMICAL TOILETS '$' -- 222SO9 07/30/87 73.00 73.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS i9 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CHEMICAL TOILETS 20; ' 665.00 22 23 ' 24 222858 22 2558 07/30/87 0 7/30/87 42.08 70.30 ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIR EQUIP s 22CS58 07/0/87 8OI .98 ST PAUL CITY OF ST. PAVE. CITY OF REPAIR EQUI %fi ' 2.5 58 222558 07/3087 07/30/87 2 4' 1 . OE 3g ST PACE. CITY OF R REPAIR EQUIP REPAIR EQUIP �$ 222858 07/30/87 47.00 ST RAUL CITY OF ST PAUL CITY OF REPAIRlIP 29 30 1.293.41 REPAIR EQUIP 31 * ** 32 33. 34: 2 22565 07/30/87 # 5f 00 ST PAUL RAMS PIED TEST I NC 3s 166.00 36: 37: 222S66 07/30/87 30.50 ST PAUL DISP PUBL ISHING 30.50 _ i 1 .2 222S68 Crib 07/30/87 07/30/87 150.00 ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS PROGRAMS � _222868 222 Sb8 07!30/87 96.00 9b.4�0 ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS - _ ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS PROG _ . 222SGS 07/30/87 78.00 8T PAUL. SUBURBAN BUS PROGRAMS PROGRAMS i 420 .00 222883 07/30/87 528. o ; 0 8 1 _ STATE OF MINN TREAS LICENSE FEE 528. 0 222584 07/30/87 35.00 STEEPEN SCOTT 3 CANINE ALLOWANCE 4 ` 35.00 R 2730 / 0 f 4 TAROT: T S PPL PR Pa. g e 10 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER f CHEC NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR IT EM DESCRI z 222T30 ;; 07/30/87 7.27 TARGET SUPFLIE2 PROC -- - - - -- ..227 07/ A 0�. TA RCET 4i g i 222730 07/30/8? 8.02 TARGET LIES $�iP_ PR E1C SUPPLIES P ROC 222T30 07/30/87 4.20 TARGET SUPPLIES LIES PROC - ' 222_T3 07/30/87 i... X64 TAR GET SU PPLIES PR OC____ a ` 222730 07130187 7.`2 TARGET SUPPLIES LIES PROD` 222T30 07 /30/87 12.06. TARGET SUPPLIES PRO C 10! 242.50 * PP PRQ !3 ' Q. 222750 07/30/87 47.12 T J AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES _ -.. .:. s 222793 07/30/67 100.32 TWIN CITY FILTER CONTRACT PYM too. 4 1 5 ; 22 2U50 07/30/87 96.15 UN IFORMS UNLIMIT UNI s 222U50 07/30/87 _ 184..28: UNIFORMS UNL iNI TEa UNIFORMS 228Us 07/ 30/87 187 UNIFORMS UNLIMI UNIFORMS 8 1 228U50 222050 07130/87 X5 .60 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED. UNIFO �j 222050 07/30/87 47/30/87 420.00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 71.90 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 222050 07/30/87 111.42 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFOR - 99 2i 4 i sI 222US6 07/30/87 54.60 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL OXYGEN e 222U 07/30/87 136.93 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL OXYGEN I9t.53 222V50 07/30/87 76.50 VIRTUE PRINTING PRINTING 3. 3~ 222 V50 07/30/87 192.20 VIRTUE PRINTING PRINTI 4; r 'l 222W19 07/30187 27.50 WARNING LITES SUPPLIES 27.50 - cccwo v v rf .3ufa r 1 02.80 WESCO SUPPLIES 3 1 222W60 07/30/87 105.65 WESCO SUPPLIES ; LIES 209.45 Page e 11 1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER z CH N DAT A MOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESC�RLPT I flN 3 - -- -22: 073187 .... 36 .4 o Ua�F$. BUPP f 36.00 - s 222X31 07/30/87 79.60 XE' ROX CORD SUPPLIES X SUPPLIE 212.80 # ?3 a 222 Z70 07/30/87 8.32 ZUERCHER JOHN TRAVEL TRAINING g' __ -- 9 35, 419.12 FUND 0 1 TOTAL G 730.00 FUND 03 TOTAL _ HYDRANT CHARGE 7, 850.00 FUND 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT 243. 04 FUND 13 TOTAL C :3 25.00 FUND 17 TOTAL C 0 BOND 1967 � 225.00 FUND 36 TOTAL 83 -1 FROST AY ADi : g 1 FUND 44 T OTAL 84 -1 1 SOUTH OAK 6 2 - FUNO 5T TOTAL;. 86-26 CAVES GERV! 31513.29 FUND 63 TOTAL 8b -3 CENTURY AVE 6; 78 .62 F'# lN3 64 TOTAL -TT' RD Cd� . 19 2o433.51 2, 433.51 FUND 70 TOTAL 86 -12 ARKWR IGHT ; 477.17. FUND 73 TOTAL 8b -15 WTR DISTR 1 _ 351. FUND 76 TOTAL 8 6 - 22 HILLC 2 3, 994.88 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER F1 3 ' T3.03 FUND 95 TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT 41 589.95 FU ND 7 TOTAL V b EQUIP f s 6`. b 0 , 529.21 TOTAL 9 f ti r F T l\T O t i i 2 1 3 4 5' 6i 7 3 2; i 3! 5: i DATE 07/22/87 PROGRAM PR10 C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO LjlvlZ31ulN NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME LARRY J PAY 10322 01-0109 GREAVU JOHN C 400. 001 10323 01-0480 1I a m A 31 WAS ILUK !t ^ lk CHARLOTTE P 325w 00' 10325 01-7538 L M114 JUK FRANCES L 325s 00 10326 01-8088 ANDERSON 'NORMAN 8 325. Oe DIVISION 01 LEGISLATIVE 184►s28 1700* Oe I ^ dad Wc. bj , m A 250835 1 A-03 ti.i t:p i;.0 d - 14 4 b 10328 02-9671 BEHM LOIS N 852a25 DIVISION 02 CITY MANAGER A L 852025' 3182s84 10329 10-4474 JAHN DAVID 1 674. 39 AMEL—OL-201- HNSON , 0 L. Y Lr. —'-E-993-a-37— LjlvlZ31ulN 10331 12 - '0166 CUDE LARRY J 242e40 4 0332 12 t A --ft. ZUERCHER OSTER JOHN ----------- Aim L 157. 60 u m A- ;T 665-8 3- Et'rm1 =KL;=14LrT Z=KV.LUr. 10334 21-1078 FAUST DANIEL F 1846n28 DIVISION 21 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 184►s28 10335 22-4432 p 0 on MOELLER MARGARET A 250835 1 A-03 ti.i t:p i;.0 d - 14 4 b MR1 R L H N H K bbb e� 10337 22-7550 VIGNALO DELORES A L 852025' 10338 22-8777 THELEN u On RS1011V CARL J J 600. dd0v bld- pq I Illij I v I Z:� I urq 9.-: d HuuuuN I ay (%,b L L 7 —a - 87 ._.r. NUM EMPLOYEE NUMB NAME PAY z 10340 —' -' " 31 2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 1705 ,w 48 3 10341 31 -9815 SCHADT ,TEAiViVE L 773a 30 31 CITY CLERK . ADM INISTRATION 2478n78 MCL..3C T V I E TO R LO R RA I EVE S 760 s 06 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 531.51 on S GREEN PHYLLIS C 963.37 33 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 3305w5 `s DIVISION 9 41 --1717 COLLI KENNETH .L , 2 r l 13 10343 33- -4435 JOANNE 10344 3►``_ ,� 4534 .y %ri— �� 10346 33 -8389 i D DIVI 31 CITY CLERK . ADM INISTRATION 2478n78 MCL..3C T V I E TO R LO R RA I EVE S 760 s 06 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 531.51 on S GREEN PHYLLIS C 963.37 33 DEPUTY REGISTRAR 3305w5 I , 1 41 --1717 COLLI KENNETH V 1917s48 8 10349 41 -2934 SVENDSENr JOANNE M s 868o25. 1 0350 41-3183 NELSON ROBERT D 1675n88 103 52 t 41 -9263 MART I NSON CAROL F 619m45 DIVI 41 � { PUBLIC SAFETY ADM IN N 6507. 9 6 10353 42-0130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1455. E6 ..I 2. 10355 42 -0457 SKALMAN DONALD W 1357, 48 1 0356 Z7 42 -0918 NELSON CAROB. czkia M 14e e. 06 10358 - 42-1204 STLFFEN SCOTT L 1335o27 10359 42 -1364 y ARNOLD DAVID L 1455.26 10361 42-1660 BOHL JOHN C 1296063 r ..� 10362 4 CAHANES ANTHONY G 1675888 10364 42 -2063 MOESCHTER RICHARD M 1357.48 10365 m!m A a 48- -2115 ATCHISON JOHN H 1396.68 i �. —�. Hil 145D. 10367 48- -2859 S Z C Z E PANSK I THOMAS J 1064o 98 I , Aii, 4,qj"' DATE 07/22/87 C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 :� PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO I 1 1 w I'S %OF %of low NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY - r +f � j J468 42-3243 WELCHLIN CABOT v 1011.46 10369 42-3591 LANG RICHARD i 1371o88 m H 5 5) 33� 1 N Ulu %l2mmvLumz 10371 42-4916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 1371u88 110372 42-6119 DREGER RICHARD C 1455.26 —42 76- 2688u56 10374 42-8226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1332 : 68 10375 42-8434 BECKER RONALD D 1332.68 3 L. U r% r. v 11*4 K I OW wi 0 1. 10377 42-9204 STOCKTON DERRELL T 1308s68 14,; .10378 42-9499 PAULOS—JRW PAUL 0 398. 00 t 0 �303% -7 7 a :7007 .1 3 T 4 1 T 016 g% A V %-a A Li VOL &qw% It r% 70 1e380 43-0009 KARIS FLINT D, 1332e68 low 10381 43-0466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 1332u68 13 1 17' IM *2 4 3 -052 m 16 A 40 ' 48 L 53 55 56 57 i 10384 10386 10367 43-22el 43-6071 43-7418 YOUNGREN VORWERK BERGERON UHV I U J14MES on-Aft-2- AIML ROBERT JOSEPH G E A 1594, 23 1405u48 1454. E t A N 1) rm R Moil JUN m H 5 5) 33� 1 N Ulu %l2mmvLumz 10389 i e,390 45-1878 45-3333 EMBERTSON WILLIAMS JAMES DUANE M J 1431s88 1256o68 DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTION 2688u56 10392 10393 91 ift i C34 46-0322 46-0389 A K H a I IN STAHNKE BOY J HP4t-. I JULIE SCOTT .. E: A K. "Ilz S a 0 949s49 819s05 Lw 94 10395 ,� 8 &+ I= -v w 46-4801 HARAF01 A 164- RYAN 0 , J U L. i !" MICHAEL A P ON p"A" go - t.')'J f a b 1 1537a22 DATE 07/22/87 02 3 7 8 i I , JI za 3( 3, 41 4� ' 4; 4� 4s 5. 5( PROGRAM PRIO C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 10396 46-5919 NELSON KAREN A 1028.45 10397 PISMO" 8 46-7030 on ow so we OR 4m— MARTIN �lm- loom SHAWN w m 4 0- -om M 936, 09 Oft - 19Vbn i %15'V 1 =%50 j H y rqr U A+ UN 140 t.0 Ml 1140 RV -7-300-0-41 10399 51-0267 BARTA MARIE L 739, 45 1 10400 51-6872 N� A 'm em P-% HAIDER KENNETH 8 1795. 08 : so .2%y %juwT X im ms wft • 10402 52-0547 MEYER GERALD W 1158s30 10403 52-1241 KANE MICHAEL R 1219801 10405 52-3473 KLAUSING JDAiv* i ID HENRY L b F 1107s3 10406 52-4037 HELEY RONALD J 1073n57 10 4`0 8 52-4847 THURN PAUL E 480.00 10409 if 52-6224 TEVLIN, JR. HARRY J 1082s65 A W A V.4 ID a 10411 52-8314 CASS WILLIAM C 1470w46 � DIVISION 52 STREET MAINTENANCE 10158m46 10412 53-101 e ELIAS JAMES 8 1292a67 A US "I& L moo- —Ar%L�Jol%a A ffmlory lir.1141M L 0 10414 53-2522 P R I EBE WILLIAM 1256a11 10415 53-3970 AHL—JR. RAY C 1489.66 fw " A %;;p 10417 f ►3-15069 COLLINS %fpillltm%-.7 STEVEN T A 258. 76 10418 53-6109 GEISSLER WALTER m 1248.06. DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING 8248a1 1 it 9M L 4 91=2 A A mom L %VWUJ A. ;7 151V 19% A a dm 64A I 9 b I= A A go QJLLJI cat" • DATE 07/22/87 C I T Y O F M A P L EW01 PROGRAM PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPOT � 3 -- --- _.. NUM EM PLOY EE NUMBER NAME u KU55 P AY e �I e 5 1 10420 58- -1014 NADEAU EDWARD A i 1148.81 ' n 10421 58 --1590 i%1ULWEE GEORGE W 11 '29 * 7 7 3 10423 58 0M-2563 BREHE IM ROGER W 1061m05 i 3 10424 58 -258E EDSf, N DAVID 8 107 . 87 d .4r % s i { f t I ' is a: r 3 1 t r r ; d 1 10426 59-1000 MULVANEY DENNIS tai 1154 .33 �# DIVISION 59 VEH & EQUIP P MA I SIT 1164. 33 j 10427 61-0389 ODEGARD ROBERT D 17E3. 08 # �. J S —:- ` 10429 61- -1993 N.RUMMEL BARBARA A , 59s 7E 10 30 61-2618 STAPLES PAUL I NE 1367,s26 DIVISION 61 COMM SERVICES ADMIN 4318.31 � 1 E i j � fi . 33 10438 �" r 6� —� 111 TRAVERS DANIEL L 1100 50 fl E 10433 6E -3790 ANDERSON ROBERT S 913. OS 31 F i 104 35 t 62- -4097 YUKER ID NNI WALTER A • t..d� 81s001 10436 62-412 1 HELEY ROLAND B 1075. 13 10438 J 62-6943 f SCHNE I DER i GREGORY W 498. 75 3 ,� 104,9 .� 6 7.19 BURKE MYLES R 1102u65 i` WARREN d • 10441 62 --7568 TURNER GARY D 432o50 1044 62-81 GE RMAIN DAVID A 108E. 65 :s t , ... ofte a- i i sm -4 s • • DATE 07/22/87 40 PROGRAM PR10 .0 I T Y O F M A P L E W 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPOI 1 0462 63-799 ANDERSON CHRISTINA M 328. 70 10463 63-8277 BESETH --J R. RONALD L 312s00 10465 63- 9138 8 I ERSCHE I D SCOTT R 174. Oft 10466 63-9185 I KHAML JAMES R 308 10 J �'7 10468 63 --9660 HAWN JEFFREY T 2 � i 1 0 � 46- �_ x..36, �'�' 9 63 9718 DORNBUSCH AMY L 102.00 i DIVISION 63 RECREATION PROGRAMS 7540. 19 abet i i 10471 64 -2163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 454.5E 10472 64 --4566 ORR JAN I CE K 211821 AM- .,. t i 10474 71 -0124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 745.85 _ 10475 71 -0551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1701.48 104 men 5 5 1 s F a; NUM EMPLOY E.E NUMBER N NAME { {SAY . 0 4 5 10444 63 --e170 S STRAUS L LAURA r J 2 r 6 1 .,� J DOUGHTY L LINDA R R 3 355, OO 71 L LED 10447 63 - 2 543 M MARVEL D DAVID H H 7 76. 5e 10448 63 --2689 K KORL I N PATRICIA E E 3 343. 10450 63 5 73 T THOMPSON J JENNIFER S S 3 354. 00 y....__. 10451 63 -3628 G GRAF M MICHAEL J J 2 279. 10453 63-4246 WARD R 11 Lommrt G 4 406 s 40 ! 1 10454 63-4605 C CASSEDAY ELIZABETH J J 3 322.5e 3 ' La.w.F. 1 19-m-40- 10456 63 -5480 P PODPESKAR K KIMBERLY J J 3 322.813 f 10457 63 -6422 T TAUBMAM D DOUGLAS J J 1 1056a86 :.. } 1 10455 63 -6786 C CLEAVELAND K KATHERINE 2 M _ 2Z a _ : 1 10460 63 --6984 H HERBER T TODD F F E E5E. 00 ;. '~ 0462 63-799 ANDERSON CHRISTINA M 328. 70 10463 63-8277 BESETH --J R. RONALD L 312s00 10465 63- 9138 8 I ERSCHE I D SCOTT R 174. Oft 10466 63-9185 I KHAML JAMES R 308 10 J �'7 10468 63 --9660 HAWN JEFFREY T 2 � i 1 0 � 46- �_ x..36, �'�' 9 63 9718 DORNBUSCH AMY L 102.00 i DIVISION 63 RECREATION PROGRAMS 7540. 19 abet i i 10471 64 -2163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 454.5E 10472 64 --4566 ORR JAN I CE K 211821 AM- .,. t i 10474 71 -0124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 745.85 _ 10475 71 -0551 OLSON GEOFFREY W 1701.48 104 men 5 5 1 s F 10477 71-8754, L I V 11. DIVISION 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADM IN 332aa 2* 10478 72-7178 EKSTRAND i j* 31 J',4 Viz! li I v I i U14 oil THOMAS 1150w38 L 1`L 1048e . 73-0677 OSTROM 10481 73-1942 CARVER 6 JOYCE L 323.24 MARJORIE 139lo26 • DATA 08/04/87 C I T Y O F M A p L E W t . PROGRAM PR 10 ' PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REI ...._� � �#U�1 EMPLOYEE + C � �, GRtaSS EEU�1E�ER i�Aj�E PAY- ro j 1 x' el` --1801 McGU I RE MICHAEL A •- 33 5 10489 02- -9 BEHil LC IS ill 852 { J DIVISION aT.. ,.._ •b.•......_..o... _w 0` CITY MANAGER -� •- 3 182. 84 i 1 049 1 1 x r SWANSON J R. DAVID LYLE J E 674839 •=� S`0. 48 { :; DIVISION 10 CITY HALL MAINT 1594n87 r 5 t 1 049 12-0188 CEDE LARRY i 242 40 � li L . 1, 60 + 1 12- 5 - 305 OSTER ANDREA i c C G65 v 05 { 4 s DIVISION y; t 12 EMERGENCY SERVICES •� c 106,. 05 - 1 "1495 `1--1 078 FAUST DANIEL F 1846. �.8 2 DIVISI 21 FINANCE AD }ii I N ISTRAT ION 1846.w a 10498 22--4438 MOELLER MARGARET DA RE T A �_� -� 25e is 35 j = 10497 82••• - 4446 MATHEYS ALAiVA K • -+ 868. 25 �1 0498 7550 i - 4 - -- -8 7 V I GN THELEh! _ DELORES - A 85�:'. �::5 CARL 1 600800 10 �-i �� -- 9267 ANDERSON CA ROLE J 1164. �.:' 4 • f DIVISION 88 ACCOUNTING . �735 s O5 iJ i _ f ... � 1 1--' 1 S8 AUREL I US LUC I LLE E 1705s48 f2 --4 10503 31 -981 LVOG SCHADT PETTY JEANNE D L 1.890 00 4 745885 f 0 DIVISION 31 CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATION i 2637 ol • DATE 08/04/87 PROGRAtl PR 10. DIVISION 33 DEPUTY REGISTRAR � : � CHECK Ati- I t I f 41-2356 41,2934 DULL. INS RICHIE SVENDSEN KENNETH CAROLE JOANNE V L GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME ROBERT D PAY W :"J 10504 - 33-0109" 47 KELSEY CONNIE L 346. 15 10505 33-4435 - -4 VIETOR LORRAINE S 726s65 5S4 LEY P4T CIA A 415. 83 10507 33-6105 CARLE JEANETTE E 607,o45 10508 33-8389 GREEN PHYLLIS C I T Y 0 F M A P L E k PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP 3025u13 a # 1 7 ., - V., -:2 1051e, 10511 Ati- I t I f 41-2356 41,2934 DULL. INS RICHIE SVENDSEN KENNETH CAROLE JOANNE V L 1917a 48 706w65 956u36 41 —31 NELSON ROBERT D 1675.88 W :"J 10513 41-7636 OMATH JOY E 72Ou25 10514 41-9263 MART INSON CAROL F 61 9. 45 DIVISION 41 PUBLIC SAFETY ADMIN 6 O? 10515 42-0130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1455m 26 1 0516 42-0,251 STILL VERNON T 13018,w 68 10517 42-0457 SKALiMAN DONALD W 1357u48 10518 42-0918 NELSON CAROL 146ein 17 10513 42-0990 IN10RELL I RAYMOND J 1357.24 -1 0520 42-1204 STEFFEN SCOTT L 1444n96 10521 42-1364 ARNOLD DAVID L 1455a 26 1 0522 42-1577 BAN I CK JOHN J 1428w7l 10523 42-1660 BOHL JOHN C 1158.28 1 '7 F 24 10525 42 —1899 42-1930 CAHANES ANTHONY G 1675.88 CLAUSON DALE K 1357u48 10526 42-2063 MO,ESCHTER RICHARD M 1 357. 48 i 40 H I utITSON—o- ............. .. �H — 1 �6w 6.9 4 . 10528 42-2884 PELTIER WILLIAM F 1455m 26 10529 F 4— 855 - S SZCZEPANSKI THOM 1v88 J 103 0 Z�32432 W5 C RL v 1 00, 28 10531 42-3591 LANG RICHARD J 1371m88 1 10532 42-4775 6 PAL MA STEVEN T 819408 10 33 42-4916 HERBERT thl I'CHAEL J 1371 u88 4.7 10534 42-6119 DREGER RICHARD C 1455u26 i 10535 42-7686 MEEHAN, JR JAi&11ES E 1308*68 �i 10536 42-8226 STAFNE GREGORY L 1332o68 1151 4 157, 015c, 157 a DATE 08/04/87 PROGRAM PR10 CHECK glum Et IPLOYEE NUts'llBER NAME GROSS PAY EMBERTSON JAMES M 1431 113552 45-3333 W I LL I AMS DUANE i 1256m 68 f. 1-31 DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTION 2688 ■ 56 0 10537 42-8434 BECKER RONALD D 1332n68 10538 42-6516 HALWEG KEVIN R 1697u72 L --4 2-- 8 kl 4� ----- - - 75TOU 114 1:K To, DERRELL T 1308. 68 JULI E 10540 42-9499 PAULOS-JR* PAUL G 396*00 BOYER 10541 42-9867 BOWMAN RICK A 1283. 88 46 -2990 SARAFOLEAN JULIA A 665s05 t DIVISION 42 POLICE SERVICES - iil — I C H A E L P 35383m 40 10558 46 -5919 NELSON KAREN A i KARIS FLINT D 1332. 66 all, s 10543 43-0466 HEINZ STEPHEN J 1332a 68 JAYME 10544 43-1769 GRAF DAVID M 1405. 48 5 '+,:"'tw� J� TRmll DAB! ID J 1547u54 46 1 05 1 46 43-22ei 1 YOUNGREN JAMES G 1669w 24 10547 43-4316 - RAZSKAZOFF DALE E 1495, 41 8 6 7T RK tBERT E 145. 46 10549 43-7418 BERGERON JOSEPH A 1317w21 10550 43-7791 ti"IELANDER JON A 1398w 46 DIVISION 43 PapampnTr PP Pk) T r9Z Q .1 rn l*% A 4 1% EMBERTSON JAMES M 1431 113552 45-3333 W I LL I AMS DUANE i 1256m 68 f. 1-31 C I T.Y 0 F M A P L E W PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTION 2688 ■ 56 0 10553 46-0183 RABINE JANET L 8648041 6-0322 STAHNK JULI E A 3' 10555 46-0389 BOYER SCOTT K 782u4 10556 — f - 05 46 -2990 SARAFOLEAN JULIA A 665s05 t .46-4801 - iil — I C H A E L P 1457. 75 10558 46 -5919 NELSON KAREN A 868n25 10559 46-7030 MARTIN SHAWN m 852u25 S JAYME L 868,w 25' 47 1 -'D I V"T Sl 46 DISPATCHING - SERV 7196n 93 C I T.Y 0 F M A P L E W PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP DATE 08/04/87 PROGRAM PRIO C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W PAYROLL. CHECK REGISTER REP ECK -GROSS Num EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 10561 51-0267 BARTA MARIE L 734881 10562 51-6872 HAIDER KENNETH G 1795s08 CRL __ SBECK JUDY M 449s051 sir 2978n94 10564 52-0547 MEYER GERALD W 1244o36 10565 52-1241 KANE M I CHAEL R 1360.58 L DAQIb P 11..5.45 10567 52-3473 KLAUSING HENRY F 1105s77 1 ellu-5 68 5u:-i— 4 0 37 HELEY RONALD J 1105a 1 t e 1 4 5 0 0 OSWALD ERICK D .511u75 0570 52-4847 THURN PAUL E 477w25 10571 52-6224 TEVLIN,, JRw HARRY' 1 1190889 105072 52-6254 FRESERG RONALD L 1066.55 10573 52-8314 CUSS W I LL I Al'i C 1497m66 DI.VISION 52 STREET MAINTENANCE 1 e,689a 37 10574 5 l3f 10 1 ef ELIAS i A rl"ll El S 6 1471m 11 1 0 - 575 3-1 5688 PECK DENNIS L 1203v45 10576 53-2522 PRIELSE WILLIAM 1309881 10577 53-3970 AHL—JR. RAY C 1489.66 1 0578 53-4671 GES LE JAMES T 1488w45 10579 53-5069 COLLINS STEVEN A 457u2O 10560 53-6109 FEE ISSLER WALTER M 12013, 45 r dpi DIVISION 53 ENGINEERING 8 6 2,3` 13 10581 54-3775 LOFGREN JOHN R 857,s 05 DIVISION 54 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG MAINT 857, 05 1 10582 58-1014 NADEAU EDWARD A 1206m 06 10583 58-1590 "11ULWEE GEORGE W 1051.05 Yz • DATE 08/04/87 C I T Y 0 F til A P L E W P RUG RA114 PR10 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP, CHECK GROSS NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY 10584 58-1720 NUTESON LAVE RNE S 1530, 34 10585 58-2563 BREHEIM ROGER W 1 1 oon 32 1 5 58 2 - 5 - 92 EDSON DAVID 0166 B lllgw96 10587 58-5993 OWEN GERALD C 401v85 DIVISION 58 SAN SEWER OPERATION 6419w58 10586 59-1000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1161w85 DIVISION 59 VEH & EQUIP MAINT 1161u85 4 105 U DEGAWD— SRT 10590 61- -1066 BRENNER LOIS i 912w3l 10591 61-1993 KRUt-IMEL BARBARA A 430m28 STAPL PAS. T Wit=lin--S-ER V I CES iti1 i N 4 10593 62-1301 THURIK SCOTT 360800 10594 62-2111 TRAVERS DANIEL L 97a75 =0 ROBERT S 993805 10596 62-3915 LINDORFF DENNIS P 1059» 93 10597 62-4097 YUKER WALTER A 811600 -4121 HELEY ROLA•D B 1062. 65 10599 62-5506 MARUSKA MARK A .1175s45 10600 62-6943 SCHNE I DER GREGORY w 420. Oet 19 ___B_URKE MYLES— R 1102w65 10602 62-7762 SB RAG IA WARREN 1 420. oe, 10603 62-7968 TURNER GARY D 360v00 10604 62-8182 GERMAIN DAVID A 1088W89 10605 62-8762 BRENNER JAY 294a00 DIVISION 62 PARK MAINTENANCE 8515w37 10606 63-0170 STRAUS LAURA i 273w38 J i • DATE 08/04/87 C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W C PROGRAtl PRIet PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP HECK I WHM cwm GROSS m � �0 1 0% 6684. 38 6 .-.; I' RECREATION PROGRAMS _'; 10631 � � c�Urr,DE R r�Ar�E JANET M •892u25 PAY 64-2163 10607 10608 63-1245 63-1518 DOUGHTY LINDA R 250v00 JANICE K — 1 _0 - 8 i- 14 63-2689 SHELDON KORLIN LEO B 75. 18 DIVISION 10610 63-2887 HOLLAND P.ATRICIA E M 308m 55' 1 77- 106il -- - --- 63-3573 THOMPSON JENNIFER S 252moo 279800 10613 63-3744 GRAF VASQUEZ MICHAEL 212w63 10614 63-4246 WARD MICHAEL • 236sOO 63 4 Y ROY G 1 406*40 33 6 4 10616 10617 63-5298 63-5480 JANSEr4 PODPESKAR PAUL R v.50 238m65 jr-v, A KIi MBERLY -------------- • 235*20 86 10619 63•6462 RHODA a A, lly E a 119820 10620 63-6786 CLEAVELAND KATHERINE M 252a 00 10622 63-7042 EfME WARD 1062.3 63-7991 - ANDERSON KERI CHRISTINA L M 101* 85 215,oOff 10625 6z 63-9132 ST14 TH IRLD L 223e18 0626 63-9138 FISCHER BIERSCHEID PATRICIA R 258v30 - lk'Y S� �7 - I KH A �ML SCOTT JAi %IES R • 248. Oet 2 62 10626 10-629 63-9634 63-9660 JORDAN ERIC s 8 248a 00, .., - s 6 4i 6 HAWN DURNbOgN JEFFREY A V, y T • 210,00 L 1 06. 00 m � �0 1 0% 6684. 38 6 .-.; I' RECREATION PROGRAMS _'; 10631 64-0508 GREW JANET M •892u25 10632 64-2163 SOUTTER CHRISTINE 454w52 10633 64-4566 ORR JANICE K 145,ft 31 le,634 64-4624 HORSNELL JUDITH A 433w32 DIVISION 64 NATURE CENTER 1925u4O 10635 71-0124 DOHERTY KATHLEEN M 745n85 10636 10637 71-05:51 71-3174 SON GEOFFREY .... W 1701n48 10638 71-8754 WEGWERTH LIVINGSTON JUDITH JOYCE A 415u84 L 323,24 DIVISION 71 COMM DEVELOPMENT ADM IN 3186.41 134 yEj -------------- - - - - DATE 08/04/87 C I T Y O F M A PROGRAM PR 1 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REI 4 0 40 NUrA E NUMB NAME GROSS } PA 10639 72-7178 EKET RA iD THOMAS G 1092 1 06,40 72 -8505 _..�__..._ _. JOHNSON RANDA L L L 1 2 1 x. 6 4 . ; - .. ..... DIVISION ._._. .. 72 PLANNING 2305 u 56 3 j y l j i f � i lk 41 i . 1 064 7G -1 S42 CARVER NI CHOLAS CHOLAS `6 N 1 055.45 6 l .: DIVISION 73 BUILDI I _ r. •�• 71 +450. � f 10643 74-0776 WEMGE R ROBERT .3 11 :. 7� m 1. Lho ION 74 - HEA�.TH I INS ECTIOS 13 45 3 3 i FD . OT Oil FILE 14342 GRAM? TOTALS �►� • -, 14.�425a 82 3 f 't i t v t T .x t ' w 3 4 0 40 The applicant is requesting final plat.approval to develop the 28 -lot first phase of the Nebraska addition. Refer to the final g tat ma on x page 6 p p Discussion The f i nal .plat reflects a proposed change in the preliminary plat. A plat revision request has been submitted to replace Nevada Court with two single - dwelling lots that would front on McKnig Road (page 5 T h g his change is in response to the U. S. Arm Corps of En in ' Y P g eer s wetland preservation requirements. Consequently, the adjacent outio Y � t , to be deeded to the city i for park and drainage, s nearly twice as large as originally proposed, Recommendation Approve.the Cave Nebraska Addition final plat. MEMORANDUM r TO: FROM: City Mana `'' . b Counci�,«1 '!I. Asso ciate Planner Randall Johnson SUBJECT: Final P 1 a t �n�-Q rse ,,. ---- LQCAT I ON: Currie S treet and Montana ' Avenue difle OWNER: PROJECT: Ed Cave and Sons Cave's Nebraska Addition DATE: August 3 , 1987 Date SUMMARY introduction The applicant is requesting final plat.approval to develop the 28 -lot first phase of the Nebraska addition. Refer to the final g tat ma on x page 6 p p Discussion The f i nal .plat reflects a proposed change in the preliminary plat. A plat revision request has been submitted to replace Nevada Court with two single - dwelling lots that would front on McKnig Road (page 5 T h g his change is in response to the U. S. Arm Corps of En in ' Y P g eer s wetland preservation requirements. Consequently, the adjacent outio Y � t , to be deeded to the city i for park and drainage, s nearly twice as large as originally proposed, Recommendation Approve.the Cave Nebraska Addition final plat. REFERENCE Past.Action 4- 13 - 87: Council approved Cave's Nebraska Addition reliminar subject ect o � P Y plat (page, 4 ) , 3 t the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval: 1. All necessary contracts must be executed b the count fo r the construction of a trunk water main within McKn • y y McKn Road before plat application will g e final . PP be accepted for more than 28 lots. The remaining lots in Phase I may be final-platted after contracts are signed for the McKnight Road construction. If water is not available in McKnight Road, ro osed Phase II .(Nevada cul -de -sac shall P P • be platted as an outlot. A final plat for these lots can be applied for once the McKnight Road water main is functional (cul -de -sac to be deleted). 20 Outlot A (now referred to as Outlot E) shall be expanded to include the area agreed to between the city nd developer for a Y p park (now referred to as Outlot D) , Outlot A shall be dedicated to the city for drainage and park purposes. 30 The city will pay for the additional park i paving the trails n the park from PAC funds. provide the grading and subsurface materials f developer and parks director cannot agree on a the developer shall pay for an appraisal which price of the lots. land and the cost of The developer shall or the trails.. If the price for the two lots, shall determine the 4* The pond i ng easement-may go outside Outlot A ( now referred to as Outlot E) , provided that all lots have at least 10,000 square feet of area outside the easement. 5. A signed developer's agreement, with required surety, shall be submitted for all required public improvements. This agreement shall include., but not be limited to: a. The construction of trails on Outlot A (now referred to as Outlot E) as required by the director of parks and recreation. A grading plan shall be submitted for approval. by the city engineer g and director of parks and recreation. b. The provision of a water and sewer service in Currie Street for 1464 McKnight Road with Phase II (Nevada cul-de-sac). If the city collects a cash connection charge within five years, it will revert to the developer. 6. Submittal of final grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans for approval by the city engineer. Procedure City council decision kd Attachments 1e, Location Map 29 Preliminary Plat 3. Proposed Revisions to Preliminary Plat 4. Final Plat (8 -1/2 X 11) 5. Final Plat (Separate Enclosure) 2 j c ti i r. a II I F h low O t I tt . t!•,t_ tom:.:' �—+w •~ w.. . * w .0 •/• 1 to ' W ►+ • i *4 « _ CAVES NEBRASKA ADDITION. dr '• s so, 7 _ '. AS PROPOSED FOR REVISION � o as the Caves • Z (referred t "� Addition) Nebraska Second sell e: d` o • n. w ;� . a 4 WHO ..w q s» a•. boo t .•.•rr •.•.' ..err,•+ sin k ( -- •,r t1 — • •t•r, ,r•♦ . « I• .•. •••.•« rru u.• M $we • Nw •. N . r•..• ••••w•• • I•• J 1 i' - so go 0148 ma p seat - Mi s 0 694 O « p f �_ t f += C W ORAM III• �� 1 1 -..�� - �� ..0/3 s - =�� rN�.00 i M • 0. ..... - -" SIR•• «•!•! • ; • .'• ..•r 1 •••r••. • += i W OO Ties r• • •• • 04 wy 0. L' i A A L, L8 N E Sp I A Z K 3 13 23 t = _ 12 u •.►.• . - • r• r I me .f • twA .. 11i1 ob .••mow• f " • ~ .. ;. .. ' Sam ' M• i - 14 j t _ _ / _•• • niz • '► I. �" t j OT A 1 do 001 / V 11 `� f r 2 yw- •w..wwr1 1 -� � fog r i __ '" +a ' AREA OF MAJOR REVISION �' -•,.: —''�;- •,,,, to 1 .01 L ob. i M, all w!•l,'t I•w N . -• 1 lip �/i1►/, �i ir/i �� RIMS © OW— ••I A IN 'PiZOPOSE'D REVISION TO CAVES NEBRASKA ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 Attachment 3 SOUTHERLY PORTION OF CAVES NEB RASKA ADDITION PRELIMIN— ARY.pLAT AS APPROVED* 4-13-87 i amp � s h • Out 1 of A Acorn Gr zi eenhouses It cc » - �taQK�- MA'ft'!T'w • l ease p` — « ..w « w r ro, s w.w, t.,• ..., ale M w Q ' 1 arm r t = r.. 0 40i4W►w Nw ap" ( M• M« iiw J ttao ♦t ssr' y► - :a - i 41 j I _ 2 3 s 4 5 6 YJIJ SWISO V. of � � I s � : w, .T.. — --,— >,! �� ' 7T.3' .�"•'r!. sew.► ? � �� _ ' Nor" s!•w � t �� . "irs: e s• .-� .€: • . � d3oo s•e.�.arss �-._ � $ __^ • 4 � 12 s - OC not-so � w� r Mt!•fI'w 1 � c P"� �•? t * e . � y � «p+-ss s :•w � L3ss � �l o vtto ��- / J = s+ / O J►b'f1'w tt' a `�Or�r'IMI.NrLeftnew ; ( / an r sVt .► AM .r sew \ , • s _ , f s L •' /` ;# r wl•sr r+�w «ftc14,t ft. it at `loll. ss it t Out 1 of s A B and C to be developed once city w ter � is available in McKnight Road j Outlots D and E are to be owned by the city for a mini park and storm drainage. i Final Plat Cave's Ne r • b aska Addition t f v Atta -hman+ d • TO: City Manager FROM: Randall Johnson — Associate Planner SUBJECT: F i n a l P l a t APPLICANT /OWNER: Betty Hasse LOCATION: County Road B and Arkwr ' �ght Street PROJECT: Hasse Addition DATE: July 28, 1987 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION e J '14k. ;. � d.i f i ed.�.. - -- — �, o Re j ecte : ?4 D ,.4 The applicant is requesting final plat approval for a fiv e lot subdivision. COMMENTS Council approved the Preliminary p lat P y p on June 8, 1987, Each of the conditions of the approval has been satisfied. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the Hasse Addition final plat. ATTAruM 1. Preliminary plat 2. Final plat (8Z x 11) 3. Final plat (separate attachment) = ' . . - . . . . . . . . . .' . . . - . | ' | " COUNT Too _.. . � in . [---- � - ! W. 00 ' . Note: Four foot sliver required to be part . . . | . of the I ot to the south. Ap / . . .. v ~| 04 --~-- ' �^| . . ux -~~ / | ( Ile �oa�roxvf / HA33E PRELIMINARY PLAT ' Attachment l "� 288.99 S 89055 1 W 32440 +t I; t t r,� •, f r ttt �. f t lip w t �4 ( t ht- %' 1,x-1 of �t ►c•. 1 7 r - 'T" ` J 1 _ . iJ L -- I M • r 1i., NV' t '•1 I Se r , 1 7 M n, ;ter Y � 1 • to _ N 9 E 162.00 M � o t CO COUNTY -- ; ROAD ROAD B o— N89053'09 E 0 112.58 0 ♦.... -.mss r ':..r. ..... err .. �. (D �; , 10 ti 1• DRAINAGE AND ILITY EASEMEN _,,r I� T - - - - - - -- - - y� - - - - -- - - 520.5- — . w 1 cr ai Z ' W . CD J 00 i M - N 89 41" E 14700 N 89 + 27 "E 1 50 } 109.27 - - -yL - 373.5 - -- 0 h 2 ice"' { Oh .0 _ 1-- "E . �0 N 89 ° 5527 254.281 0:0 cr O N 1 Q) sow z 00 3 i 3 .,,,,, ... _ I N E �,��'• .. l a . 252.35 lit + , M �° C) (D - - •333.0 -A N 89 °55 + 27" E I .. = 290.92 _ O F- 2 x DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT Z o 0 5 o OD ' �, o . o 1� cn 288.99 S 89055 1 W 32440 +t I; t t r,� •, f r ttt �. f t lip w t �4 ( t ht- %' 1,x-1 of �t ►c•. 1 7 r - 'T" ` J 1 _ . iJ L -- ti MEMORANDUM TO: City Mana FROM: Associate Planner.-Johnson SUBJECT: Final Plat LOCATION: Marnie Street and Hillwood Drive APPLICANT/OWNER: Good Value Homes, Inc. PROJECT: Huntin Hills Second Addition 0 DATE: Jul 31, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction r - /' Action b Councl.1 Endorse 4. d___....,. M odified,....... Re ected..... The applicant is re final plat approval for ten sin dwellin lots. (Refer to the map on pa 6. Comments All of the conditions of preliminar plat approval have been satisfied. Recommendation Approve the Huntin Hills Second Addition final plat, REFERENCE Past Action 5-22-86: Council approved the Huntin Hills preliminar plat (pa 4 subject to the followin conditions: 1. Blocks Three and Four shall not be final platted until contracts 0 are si for the construction of Hillwood Drive alon the South boundar of the site. The final plat for these blocks shall conform with council's chosen ali for the Hillwood • Drive right-of-wa Blocks One and Two ma be developed as a first phase, provided Teakwood Drive is constructed* (Both phases 2. Submittal of a si developer's agreement�.. with 're suret for the construction of re public improvementso The suret shall include the construction of an eight-foot-wide trail to Vista Hills Park within the proposed walkwa (First phase) 3. Recordin of a resolution to vacate the south three feet of the Mailand Road right-of-wa adjacent to this site approval. (First phase) , prior to final plat 4a The vacated three feet of Mailand Road right-of.'wa to with the seven feet shown on the preliminar plat • to be dedicated for Mai land Road right-of-wa shall be shown on the final plat as part of the proposed adjoinin lots and as part-of proposed Huntin Drive. (First . phase ) 5* Chan "Huntin Drive" to I'Marnie st Street. (Both phases 6. Final gradin draina • and utility plans shall be approved b y the cit engineer prior to final plat approval. (Both phases 79 Eliminate the draina easement and storm -sewer . orm-sewer pipe from Lots Two throu Five, Block Three* The draina outiot s area shall or • thi all be to an existin storm sewer in Hillwood Dri've, (Second phase 9-22-860 Council approved the final plat for the ' phase of the Huntin Hills preliminar plat (pa 5). 4- 13 -87: Council ordered the construction of Hillwood Dri y ve as a cit ro4 j ect, 5-11-87:* C ' ouncil granted a one- time extension for the second phase (pa 4 of the Hunt in Hills preliminar • plat (Huntin Hills Second Addition , jl Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Preliminar Plat 3* Final Plat--First Phase 4e Final Plat--Second Phase (8 1/2 x 5. Final Plat (separate enclosure) C- V /LL 4 G OF F NE'Wfo1 r LOCATION MAP '• 3 Attachment 1 4 N �"" �� ' • I � .. I • .MAN • •, ♦� •. , � � ,, . w w -, I-- a ::: == �. VIKSL t o f, i 4 I f t� A • woo • goo e v 0 - TI L Je SOL 0 C+ )a Rib CL 1 • 1400 p ._.._. T Of f a. ao 9 M, .00 , 1 . •, ' 4 , Aoo MAOO* �w PIL , ~•� *,••. O •. I ' ' '••• ' t o so CL I I •.1009 000 ♦ •' � C+ -- � 111 , 10,0004 inks rA �...t �A •1A , . r 10. i Note: The alignment of Hill wood Drive was required to be revised, as necessary, t4 conform with an ali gnment to be chosen by the city, The city's alignm the southeast 9 ent curves to r Huntington Hills Preliminary Plat (approved 5- 22 -86) 4 Attachment 2 4 N i N N88 ° 4!'481 F i 249. 76'-. . 1.3 ---- I lh� tcd GbT Orlin b0 ' .. I a and v&-4 MAIL AND Ul;l�t MAj1 AW / ROAD y Rc� �•,�l �6 £asernenf D C.A6. v c 252.3c" �v w 178.86 Q � E i a 2 4 D' 2. 33' ,, ao Q 6� ' 39 �'•'�' Go � 9.5 9 /.� E o � %�'E 3 Its •• _ _ ( � � ! �' 250. 66 'v1 , v 179.61 4 W f :•� O gam.... i /189 s .,� N N6,9 y 4 o � ,11 AI'89 /3'E O c o 5 °28'49" g cV 'G `�' ._ _.. e = ,� ova �; h � 5 /8 86 �60 `� T `_' -- -- .'� 6 • /fit n W g 7 • 569 ' ' : ,30. /8 8 11 /7.0 '• �� 99.77 -C ds2•'4 51" wALKwAr 88.00 ' ' 32 /3-00 4 . iR 7. Gl M N89 "E TEAKWOgp , ►. . $o d 43.525 - .- ._....,. r, �. a 09 0 9 , / j o Is 90.00 � �U I 100.33 L 4 0 . r- . Z 320. 93 �6 r 59'13 T 'S , •,; p � if �'• � �$ � ca �• =� 1�t L O p Q S :.9i0. OO 144 g/ V ,c, boa " 283. 910 $ a _ ..:::� 1 e �., / _ _ Z,5Z 51 (,4 S "� "89 "E A/89 ° 39' l3''E N 82 X24 0 O W i N Q1 i C ..,., M. •.• o , OUTLOT A . -. �� I cz tfj r L �, t proposed to be p latte d P ed as a `° �' ; Hunt ington Hills Second Additio 301, 6B " HIL L W*Oco C.R V. ... 579.62 ... S 88 * 4, 7 44 'W :•. . AL HUNTINGTON HILLS Final Plat (First Phase 5 Attachment 3 N Proposed Huntington Hills lls Second Addition Final Plat 6 Attachment 4 N . 89 pS j t Z o Z4 OD Z3 /. S/ 4. ,. �;- 283.90 "...- 90 . - - -- - - -� " - J _ _ - j 04...'j - lJ- 4 °Z34Z�� 29.29' ,. � • . •• 4.4 ° 29.55 "•2.5. /P'..�' o w '9 �, 20.5.36 Nc 9°.5.9 "E 2 3 ti = 90.04 �.. 90. � 1j'9 50 /99.92 N89'.5 9' /3''E ' J o rI 7 g•s 6 o ,y 00 13 , 9 .50 ' _ 1 4= 9 � 80 ,�,�, � o 9 6' 9 � �9a � o � j �0 4 4. 3 s =4j °4, -so �� v ��i ti /i17e O,!' /TiOl r9 45 59 � � too r�V Proposed Huntington Hills lls Second Addition Final Plat 6 Attachment 4 N MEMORANDUM TOO FROM:. SUBJECT: LOCATION, APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Cit Mana Associate Planner--johnson Time Extension--Preliminar Plat South of Carver, West of 494 Walter Ebertz Carver Hei Jul 31, 19.87 SUMMARY Introduction Action b Co Endorsed-,,-. Z� Mod:Lfi Re ected...... The applicant is requestin a time extension for the approval of the Carver Hei preliminar plat. (Refer to the m 5. aps on pa 4 and rnmmgm-n4-t-_ The site gradin is nearl completed. Construction • of the utilities should be later this summer. The applicant has • also petitioned the cit for the storm-sewer improvement re to obtain a pondin easement on the propert abuttin to the east. Recommendation Approve a one- time extension for the Carver • Hei preliminar plat, REFERENCE Past Actions 8-11-86: Council approved the Carver Hei • preliminar plat subject to the followin conditions bein satisfied before final plat approval: le Submittal of a developer s a r with re suret to the cit en for the re public improvements* This a shall include the construction of a temporar cul-de-sac for the street stubbed to the east propert line, off-site storm sewer, an pond construction that will not be a public project, • detailed specifications for the excavation of the steep slope on the westerl boundar of the site and removal of the above-ground utilit lines Y and poles. 2. Acquisition b the cit or developer of a public pondin easement and accompan storm-sewer easements for the three-acre-foot pond planned on the adjoinin propert to the east. The applicant shall construct a storm sewer from the Carver Heights plat to the proposed pond* Dependent upon the size of the pond in easement obtained, construction of a pond ma be deferred until the area surroundin the wetland is developed. The city engineer may waive the construction of the planned storm sewer from this pond to Fish Creek t . if the applicant and will , can document that the p not need an outlet until l the drainage nage area is more fully developed. 3 , An easement shall be submitted- for a 108- foot - diameter tem o p nary cul- de- sac for the street to be built to the east ro ert line. p P Y 4. The streets in the plat shall be named as follows: a. The north -south street shall be named Dorland Road. b. The permanent cul -de -sac shall be named Overlook Circle. C4, The street built to the east property line shall be named Heights Avenue beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 11, Block I as the street is required to be realigned in Condition 5. 5. The alignment of the street to be built to the east ro ert p p y line shall be revised to be consistent with the area street concept map on page 12 of the staff report dated 7 6. Water quality management and erosion control plans must be approved by the city engineer. These plans shall comply with the following sections of city od P Y (b)* Y e: 9 -191 (1) (c) , 36 -566 (f) and 36 -567 7e The radius for the permanent cul -de -sac shall be increased from 50 to 60 feet. 8. City engineer approval of final radin drainage ' g g, ge and utility plans. The proposed storm sewer from the north -south street to Fish Creek shall be eliminated. Site drainage shall be directed.to the planned pond on the property to the east. A ten -foot -wide stor rm easement shall be shown along the east property line of Lot 15 Block 1, as required to be revised i n Condition 5 , ck . Planning Section 30 -5(e) states "For one year following preliminary g p ary approval • . . of unless the subdivider and the city agree otherwise no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall �a or affect the use development Pply to lopment density, lot size, lot layout or dedication or platting required or ermitted b th P y e approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations the city extend the period by agreement with the s may subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements or it may ' y require submission of a new application, unless substantial h sica ' p y l activity and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial inanclal damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application." jl Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Area Street Concept 3. Preliminary Plat 2 r ' i �i L y i6 pug F Q SIN AV �.. R , _._....._ . J v F y • I7 • R � • F NI won AVE MAMIE •„ BC R R F to F R R F F "YEA $WE 19 ol F R ITICAL A • 20 F � F V14 CE - OF NEWPOR " j L OCA TIO N . Attachment 1. • I rj L 1 .. -- 01 7�4 ------ j rte. ,',,....� j"_`^""a 0 i ip. It x ❑ I -- - T -AT jv 880 4.41 e 4C t C Jkl —,-bln IkIj,'� 001: t CY 1 - �-' , **M: c; 7f 19 790 02 • �2) x e6T3 ... .... . ... S OO x ... r x 839.0 an 894 a 0 el z 110 ams w Brothers' X Pipelines �' ' .-- - . ��. :•r:•.�•;.; ;:,:; :;:;.,. :�:�::ti�' ` � it X 0 865 0 -411 x :X IX J:- ft I* IL C X . .... 860 ...... ; . X- f 0 00 \ 75.0 ---------- )06 176 A CD S A, Q) Ar x t 22.C . ck 4 �p doe CO 0 ....... APPLICANT'S SITE AREA STREET CONCEPT 4 Attachment 2 o Z CARVER �" A v E -1 ------- I E St u / 4*7M Snr OA TE YALYE Ito Ito APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BLUFF LINE SETBACK Street required to be consistent with the Area Street Concept on a e p g 40 LIMINARY PALT 5 ' Attachment 3 ii A Number � °" �o AGENDA REPORT Action b Counoll.o Endorsed.....- TOO Cit Mana Modifie FROM: Assistant Cit En Re ected- SUBJECT: Water Service District 6 Improvements Cit Project 86-03 A and B Senior Citizen Deferments DATE: Au 3, 1987 INTRODUCTION The assessments levied for the Water Service District 6 Improvement allowed for the deferment of pa for an homestead propert o wned b a person 65 y ears of a or older for whom it would be a hardship to make pa Four of the 17 propert •owners who filed objections re senior citizen deferment returned the application forms. Council approval of the deferments is re BACKGROUND On Ma 11, 1987, the cit council held an assessment hearin for Cit Project 86=03, the Water Service District 6 Improvements, and at that meetin 17 propert owners filed objections re that senior citizen deferments be considered b the cit council. At the Ma 20, 1987, objection review meetin the cit council allowed the deferments accordin to Minnesota State Statutes providin the followin information was provided documentin homesteadin and hardship: 1* Application form, 29 Copy of most recent income tax return, 3. A sworn financial statement showin all assets, liabilities, sources of income and expenses,, 410 The option to defer the pa of special assessments will terminate and the amount to with the accumulated interest, will become due and pa if an of the followin events occur: a. The death of the owner, provided that the spouse is otherwise not eli for the deferment, bo The sale, transfer or subdivision of propert or an part thereof, C* If the propert should, for an reason, lose its homestead status, d. If, for an reason, the taxin authorit deferrin the pa shall determine that there would be no hardship to re immediate or partial payment, Attached are copies of the four applications received from the following property owners: Property Owner Address Tax Return Fin State Homeste Recommend Regina Flipp 2682 E. Geranium Doesn't Pa Yes Pay Yes Yes Julia Lepschke 5216 Taylor St.NE No N N No Minneapolis Esther Lobinsky 2523 Stillwater Rd. YeS Yes Yes Yes Paul Carrizales 2466 E. 7th St. Yes Yes Yes Yes RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council pass the attached resolution which approves the deferment of the assessments for properties at 2682 E. Geranium, 2523 Stillwater Road and 2466 E. Seventh Street and disallows the deferment of PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0042 owned b Julia Lepschke. The Lepschke property i y P P p y s not homesteaded and does not qualify under Chapter 435 of the Minnesota State Statutes. jC 1 y r APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZATION FOR DELAYED PAYMENT OF TAX /41 ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS' HOMESTEAD { LAWS 1974, CHAPTER 435. • s STATE OF MINNESOTA ) . County of Ramsey ) - Date _ -5� � � �( ,�. 19..�� To: Department of Property Taxation, Ramsey County, Minnesota I, the undersigned, declare under penalties of er ur P j Y i That I reside at That I am not less than 65 years of age and that th elate of my birth is That I am the owner of the property legally described as: Property Identification No. - r That my interest in the ownership of the above property was acquired on and is as follows: 42 ,_1 c i 19 1. Sole ownership (Enter yes, Vi applicable) Z. Joint tenancy, held with *, 3. Other undivided interest (Speci y) That on January 2, 19 or June 1, 19 I owned and occupied the above homestead and such occupancy. began on _ p property as my That the installments for improvements on the, special assessments dul adopted in ordinance by the of which have been allocated against the subject as of 19_ j property would create undue personal hardship on my b ehalf and I respee tfuily request that payment be delayed and that such installments be so def erred f or the years 19 to 19_ Signed �"�` ' �.� ��- �.,� . a - - - - - - - - Owner - - I ' , Clerk of the in of County, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the application of above named, has been dul reviewed and that in accordance with the minutes of official record in said chambers was duly DENIED of Y I9 _ APPROVED or That in accordance with approval granted, the special assessmen subject property levied for annual collection in the amounts andforste below sh on the affiants defetred with interest at the annual rate shown until such time as ittis nears shown be so no longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility, deemed the applicant Years of Name of Auditors D/P Total Collection Interest Assessment Number No, Amount (Inclusive) Rate r 4 Dated 19,�____ -_ (Clerk or Authorized Deputy) APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZATION FOR DELAYED PAYMENT OF TAX ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS' HOMESTEAD LAWS 19 74 , CHAPTER 4 - U . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) Date 19 To: Department of Property Taxation, Ramsey County, Minnesota I. the undersigned, declare under penalties of perjury: That I reside at ,,� Lai That I am not less than 65 years of age and that the date of m birth I Y is That I am the owner of the property legally described ass -C. ---I 'es A -.04 - 14. ze t 6 ( Property Identification No •'- ^r r 3 That my interest in the ownership of .the above property was acquired on 19 and is as follows: 1. Sole ownership (Enter yes, if applicable) 2. Joint tenancy, held with 3. Other undivided interest (Specify) C-T That on January 2, 19,� 4 or une 1, 9 1 owned and occupied the above homestead and such occupancy began on, r P property as my That the installments for improvements on the,s ecial assessments / P ssments duly adopted in ordinance by the of as of which have been allocated against the subject property would create undue personal hardship on my behalf and P l I respectfully request that ' so deferred for the years 19 to 19 payment be delayed and that such installments be Signed Owner Clerk of the of �p in County, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify application of Y y the above named, has been duly reviewed and that in accordance with the minutes of official record in said chambers was duly APPROVED DENIED as of 1 Y VED or That in accordance with approval granted, the special assessmen subject property levied for annual collection in the amounts th years below sh on the affiants deferred with interest at the annual rate shown until such time as it'is deemedown be so no. longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility the applicant Name of Auditors D/P Total Years of Assessment Collection Interest ' � • Number ---_ No . Amount &Inclusive) Rate Dated 19 (Clerk or Authorized Deputy) i 1 bON APPL ICAT AND AUTHORIZATION FOR DELAYED PAYMENT OF TAX ON SPEC ASSESSMENTS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS' HOMESTEAD " LAWS 1974, CHAPTER 4M A' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) '�- �' 95.7 E Date To: Department of Property Taxation, Ramsey County, Minnesota I, the undersigned, declare under penalties of perjury: • i: That I reside at 1 } j r Th at I am not less than 65 years of a ge and th at h -e___date_ -of- my birth is y �- y � f Z ' That I am e owner of the property legally described as: • the P P Y $ Y S eGi i d 24 _ 2._ � 7� w h _ . A Property Identification No. That my interest in the ownership of the above property was ac and is as follows: P Y acquired on h� ,� z 19= 1. Sole ownership (Enter yes, if applicable) r 2. Joint tenancy, held with �� s 3. Other undivided interest (Specify) F That on January 2, 19 50 or June 1, 19 �1 I owned and occupied the ove property as my ` homestead and such occupancy began on a �� 19 ,) That the installments for improvements on the, s ecial assess by the P ments duly adopted in ordinance as of which have been allocated against the sub ect v� < f 0 19'`� � ,� property would create undue personal hardship t �rpn1test that rz * ho �o�, o a P on my behalf and I respectfully so deferred for the years 19 9l7 to 19 q) r ` n ' `- -_Y_d nd that such {r�= t3?�a =rts be Signed � - - - - 40 do Owner I ' Clerk of the in of County, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that th application of above named has Y e r. accordance with the minutes of official record in said chambers was duly reviewed and that in ______DENIED as of was duly APPROVED or r That in accordance with approval granted, the sp ecial asses listed bel or the Years shown be so subject property levied for annual collection in the amountsandow on the affiants deferred with interest at the annual rate shown until such time as . no longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility it is deemed the applicant x Name o f Auditors D/p Years of. Total Collection Interest Assessment Number No. Amount -(Inclusive) Rate ~_+ i • r , Dated 19 (Clerk or Authorized Deputy) 1 APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZATION FOR DEIAYED PAYMENT OF TAX ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS' HOMESTEAD - LAWS 19 74 , CHAPTER 435. s , STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of Ramsey ) Date To: Department of Property Taxation, Ramsey County, Minnesota I, the undersigned, declare un er penalties of perjury: That I reside at That I am not less than 65 years of age P.nd that the date of my birth is That I am the owner of the property legally described as: Property Identification No. r That my interest in the ownership of the above property was acquir 1 and is as follows: Y q ed on. 19r I. Sole ownership (Enter yes, if ap licable) 2. Joint tenancy, held with 3. Other undivided interest (S e �e� pecify) That on January 2, 19 June 1, 19� 1 I owned and occupied the above ro ert P P yasmy homestead and such occupancy began on :!/ /i/T 19 That the in ailments for improvements on t assessments dui a o ted fn b`y the c -c�t � Y P ordinance -" o f - _P c_ c which have been as of '�-a� ,� llocated against the subject r 0pa: ty would create undue ers � - � 19 �� on my behalf and I respectfull request that P anal hardship so deferred for the years 19� to lg�c at payment be delayed and that such installments be Signed - - - Owner i in , Clerk of the of County, State application of of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the t • above named, has been dui r • accordance with the minutes of official chambers was record in said chb Y eviewed and that in _ DENIED as o f s du ly __ APPROVED or 19 ______ ' That in accordance with approval granted, the special asse subject property levied for annual collection in the amounts and for st the e bears shown on the affiants deferred with interest at the annual rate shown until such ears shown be so no longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility h time as it is deemed the applicant Name of Auditors D/P Total Years of Assessment Number N; of Collection Interest (Inclusive) Rate 7 s i ( Y Dated 19 (Clerk or Authorized Deputy) RESOLUTION APPROVING SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERMENT WHEREAS, the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood has previousl levied assessments for Water Service District 6 Improvements, Cit Project 86-03, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, three propert owners have returned documentation of homestead and financial statements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. That approval of deferment of assessments for Cit Project 86-03, Water Service District 6 Improvements, is hereb g ranted to the followin a., Re Flipp, 2682 E. Geranium Avenue be Esther V. Lobinsk 2523 Stillwater Road C* Paul Me Carrizales, 2466 E. Seventh Street 2. That the option to defer the pa of special assessments will terminate and the amount to with accumulated interest, will become due and pa if an of the followin events occur: a. The death of the owner, provided that the spouse is otherwise not eli for the deferment. be The sale, transfer or subdivision of the propert or an part thereof. ce If the propert should, for an reason, lose its homestead status, do If, for an reasons, the taxin authorit deferrin the pa shall determine that there would be no hardship to re immediate or partial pa 3* That propert described as PIN 25-29-22-33-0042, owned b Julia Lepschke is nonhomestead and therefore shall not q ualit y for deferment, A Number E - 7 AGENDA REPORT Action b Council.9 Endorserl TO: Cit Mana Modif ierl FROM: Assistant Cit En R e J e c t e d SUBJECT: Water Service District 6 Improvements to Cit Project 86-03A Chan Order 3 DATE: Au 4, 1987 INTRODUCTION Attached is a letter from the cit en consultant detailin a chan order for modifications to the control s for the Stillwater Road.water tower and Beebe Road pumpin station to provide a smaller alarm li panel in the police dispatcher's office. Council approval of all chan orders is re BACKGROUND Monitorin of pump failures and hi and low tank levels is re on a 24-hour basis. Current monitorin is provided b the St. Paul Water Utilit at McCarrons Lake water treatment plan. However, since the cit is contemplatin switchin to its own water s the current improvements are providin for future monitorin b the cit at an inexpensive cost within the cost of the project. ALTERNATIVES i's Approve the chan order, 2* Reject the chan order and stop work on remote telemetr to the cit offices, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council approve this chan order b passin the attached resolution, BUDGET IMPACT Chan order costs can be incurred within the project's bud jc -' 7.2 ".'87 AW AAW ENGINEERS N ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS Jul 23, 1987 Mr, Chuck Ahl, Cit City of Maplewood 1830 East Count Rd. Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Ahl: 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272 RE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SERVICE DISTRICT, 6 ELEVATED TANK CITY PROJECT NO* 86-03 SEH FILE: 86151 En B Please find enclosed for y our review and approval, five copies of Chan Order No. 3 for the above referenced project. This chan order is for modifications to the Service District 6 control system. Because of the relativel lar size. of the remote telemetr unit (RTU) to be placed in the police dispatchers office, the cit requested that this RTU • be placed in the buildin space above the dispatchers office with a smaller alarm li panel located in the Police dispatchers office. A proposed alarm li panel is to be wall mounted . and has a size of 14" hi b 12" wide b 6 deep. The contractor's • price for this work is $1,093, The Proposed work under this chan order can not • be accomplished within the contract time* However, this RTU is not necessar for start-up and operation of the new Service District 6 s This is because a similar set of alarms is provided at the McCarrons Lake water treatment plant and will be monitored in accordance with the ci S—contra-c-t— 9 4- I%& ---th- -e t. .___Pa,ix1------Wa-ter Utilit Accordin we recommend that the contractor be g iven a 60 da time extension from the execution of this chan order to complete the work under this chan order • onl This time extension is spelled out in the chan order. We recommend approval of this c . han order • and the time extension. If you find this chan order satisfactory, the a please have all five copies si b ppropriate city officials and returned to US for distribution. SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN a SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON INC. , CHANGE �R�ER - DATE: July 9 . 1987 LOCATION: 1 MG Tank Service Dist. No. 6 CHANGE ORDER NO. �. OWNER: _ City of Maplewood PROJECT NO. 86-03 FILE NO.: 86151 Nature of Change Description and Cost: Change location of the Autocon Remote Telemetry Unit (RTU) the city hall to a room adjacent to the Police Dispatcher's p er's office. Furnish and install smaller alarm panel in the Dispatcher's office. Installation 0 of this modification basically consists of mounting he alarm panels in g P the Dispatcher's office and handwiring between the Autocon RTU in the adjacent room and the alarm panel in the Police Dispatchers' office. Alarm anel in Dispatcher's office shall be 14" high x p g 12 " wide x 6 " deep, For this Change Order an*add to the contract of $1 093.00 CONTRACT TIME - The time of completion of the work in this Change Order No 1 is extended to 60 days following execution of the change g order. This time.extension pertains only to the work in this change r g order* . The CONTRACT TIME provisions of the Agreement remain in effect f all other work on the contract. Is Cost Actual or Estimated? Actual This authorizes Contractor to perform this work as part of Base Contract when signed b all p artie s. Y p s. Recommended for Approval: Short - Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Agreed Eby Contractor, am Hydro Storage, Inc. Contractor 2 Owner Approved for Owner: CONTRACTING ENGINEER By..____.. ...Title B Distribution 1 Resident En,;ineer 1 Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. 222 East Little Canada Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55117 Mayor Clerk St. Paul Office RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86-03, Water Service District 6 Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessar and expedient that said contract be modified and desi as Improvement Project 86-03, Chan Order 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the ma and cit clerk are hereb authorized and directed to modif the existin contract b executin said Chan Order 3. A Number MEMORANDUM Action b Council'. Endorsed-....._- TO: Cit Mana Modif3ed_.0-p-, FROM: Assistant Cit En ej ected_______ SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Reconstruction (Adele to Birmin _ m pate Cit Project 83-01 Assessment Hearin DATE. Au 2, 1987 INTRODUCTION An assessment hearin has been called for Au 10, 1987 at 7 P .m. All propert owners proposed to be assessed have been notified of the hearin the amount proposed to be assessed a their parcel, and their ri to file objections to the council to appeal to the district court. The hearin should be conducted and all propert owners should be informed that the must file an objection either written or oral prior to the close of this council meetin if the intend to file an appeal to district court. In addition, the cit attorne will want to state each propert owners' ri of objection and appeal and procedures for the hearin BACKGROUND The final phase of the Frost Avenue Improvement between Adele Street and Birmin Street is substantiall complete and final costs have been identified. Pa has been made to Ramse Count in the amount of $265,342.73 for the cit share of the construction cost. Additional construction pa of $14,896.21 are anticipated prior to finalizin the project. Easement and right-of-wa ac costs totaled $218,724.75, and indirect costs for le fiscal and en costs are estimated to e $76,416.31 for a total project cost of $602,380. The ori estimate of the total project cost at the public hearin was $399,940 includin an allotment of $50,350 for right-of-wa and easements. The lar difference between the actual cost and the estimated cost is due to the acquisition of the Gloster Park pondin easement. It was estimated at the public hearin that this easement could be ac throu the plattin process with an a with Burlington-Northern's Real Estate Division, Glacier Park Compan A len ne process y ielded a settlement, prior to a condemnation hearin e to the cit appraiser's estimated value. Pa of $206,440 was made to Glacier Park for the purchase of the easement, It is proposed that the municipal street construction fund, which currentl has a balance of undesi fund, be revised to include a pa of $175,000 to this project. In addition, the cit state- aid draina account has appropriated $31,650 for project costs. The total assessable cost is, therefore, proposed to be $395,730, The costs are divided according to storm sewer ad curb and gutter for assessment, The curb and gutter cost is $61,535 while storm sewer is $334,195, I t em Curb and Gutter Storm Sewer RL RM and SC Units 5 , 763.86 FF 418,313.00 SF 1,937,673.00 SF Cost $ 61,535,00 334,195.00 Rate $10.676/FF 09078/SF 0.155/SF The storm sewer was calculated based on the 1 • and use plan with the residential light (RL) rate one -half the residential • idential medium (RM) and commercial rate. Municipal Property as calculated Within this assessment Y ated at the RM rate. of , municipal property included 432.0 front fe curb and gutter and 52,931 square feet of et of $12, 816.34. Attached is the proposed storm sewer for a total assessment roll applying these rates, ALTERNATIVES 1. Adopt the assessment roll with ' revisions based upon the objection filed at or prior to this hearing, 2, Reject the assessment roll, instruct s • staff as to revisions and re -order the assessment hearing. DISCUSSION Alternative One is consistent with city Y policy and closely resembles the proposed financing plan from the feasibility report. The ma' exception is the $175,000 transfer from the street major to cover the high easement reet construction fund costs. The storm sewer rate is high, especially for residential medium ( RM) r . ( � P operty. It is anticipated that a number of appeals will be filed to reduce these The council may wish to consider addition al fund assessments, transfers from the street construction fund to reduce the RM /S utter / C assessment rate. The curb and g and RL assessment rates are comparable to assessed on other projects within the city P rates . BUDGET IMPACT The street construction fund has an adopted budget fund balance of $994, OOO for 19870 This fund balance has slowly ecreased du Y since 1984 when the balance was $1,192,059 j ects and e e to the lack of state -aid street projects expenditures on overlays, seal coats and traffic affic signals. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council adopt the P assessment roll by passing the attached resolution. All e ob should uld be referred to staff for review and will be returned to the council for decision at the August 24 meeting, jc � r �` / W MAF.'K� /►7 4 46 Gar KoA/m�on Lake e a POND Late Ar .J 44 k l�r 0 Q '!� K OHL OMAN d AV C t i o -� Co RD "C W / -� o Co .� 23 N W 2 � W 3 j PALM cr 3 a C fc. dp Ova W W �• ~ E DG E H I L F� 44 W Z I • CONNOR OON R o LL ` CT DE- btpN A V C O g (' DE MONT AV m H 8 0 o A 22 f "W gA �1 Q J Q xTAN T AV ' 60 11z GERVAIS AV GERVAIS u GRANDVIEW AV Z PKWY W .� VIKING DR Y now COP E cT COPE AV Knuckle Heod Lok* do COPE Keller Lake � R 0 , O LA K AV ♦. �. p. Er4 —j N M RD o i 2 25 ai Cr r tElAND AD AND N R57 A ago= . t ` ' i JUN TI N ST m x CO RK[ W / q E AV RK o AV � DOE AV ° , �C) (1) CHAIM ST N o (I) m � A, DG _ u / ELDRI AV � ti 4 In N A ,� K I W 4 R1 C'9 �-. V l AV SK IL l AA Al+! AV ` �Q` A R R I S~-- ."',•,r,,,� N W Kf NA A OO 0(0) « t.� Q q O N ROSEWD i • N AV . �' i HNON AY A � RY N A/ S P vo so 10D iW %n AV 28 (60 (27 ••• '� X14 t•{ �N:•% tv :•:•:•:•:•:•::•::•:•::•::•:•:• :•:•:•: •:•:•:• 4i vw W 49 o•• • .•.•.•.•::.•.•.•.•:.•: •.•.•.• .•:: . w '• ' •••:.•.•.• .•.•:.•:.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. •.•.•.• .•.•: ►Pit A AV SUM +� R rii O h J o t 1 4 - - . I t O ♦" or 4 W or ..-..' W O W 6 2 v R IPL E Y z �-� �► a an R. Y A _ QL 27 a Ai' W a WaK�f'IELD Y Y J Round �^ HIA AV �� Y — W •� � � .. � a o LAKE a \�... 'D U65y + Q� L aks Pho /en A UR •v Q i -' tt ' 114 \t l �\� p 30 E � , �7 PA UL 62 64 65 • 61 Storm Drainage Area IMP 83- Hearing Notification rlviap 14 Jan 1985 PAGE 1 F 1 cog — 0 --1 #3 7 .4 PROJECT NO. 83 -01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM - ADELE PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- I5- T- 29- R- 22 -90 -23 s:=ss:=:: =m= = = =: :s = :s= .ITEM QUANTITY STREETS *f ff f 1, 0.l1.100 STORM SEWER (Rl) fffff* *f }0.040 STORM SERER (RN/SC) f* #f92, 459.000 SEC- 15- T- 29- R- 22 -90 -32 :sa�assat :r,= :ssa :aes= :s : aa : ITEM QUANTITY STREETS ff*f#1,081.400 t STORM SEWER IRLI ** #220,087.000 STORM SEWER (RM /SC) }**301 SEC- 16 T 29 R 22 - 00 - 14 ITEM QUANTITY STREETS f* ** *1 100 STORM SEWER 1RLl # * *ff# **09000 STORM. .SEWER IRM /SCI fff254,275.000 SEC 160WT 29 R 22 - 00 - 41 ITEM QUANTITY STREETS * * *f *1 STORM SEWER (RL) f**ffffff0.440 STORM SEWER (RM /SC) #1 SEC-. 1 b- T-- 29— R- 22 -00 -42 ssa;�erar=s= rs�aeaaaraarssss ITEM QUANTITY STREETS f* #f *1 STORM SEWER (Rl) **#198 STORM SEWER (RM /SC) f* #263,285.000 14 PARCELS ASSESSED PER RATE ASSESSMENT Fe Fe AT f# 0 10.616 EA. = f #* 410 1 800.91 SQ. FT. AT *f *f #0.078 EA. = *ff *f * * # $O o 00 SQ.FT. AT #*# {40.155 EA. = # *f414 26 PARCELS ASSESSED PER RATE F.F. AT ***410316 EA. = SOFT. AT ffff #0.078 EA. = S9,FT. AT f *# #$0.155 EA. = 20 PARCELS ASSESSED PER RATE F.F. AT * ** 410.676 EA. SO.FT. AT f *ff40.078 EA. = SQ. FT. AT f* ** 409155 EA. = 1 PARCELS ASSESSED PER RATE F.F. AT * *010.616 EA. = SQ.FT. AT f*ff #0.078 EA. = SQ.FT. AT M00.155 EA. = 21 PARCELS ASSESSED PER RATE F. F. AT HOIO.676 EA. = SD.FT. AT #ffft0.078 EA. = SQ.FT. AT #***40.155 EA. = GRAND TOTALS 62 PARCELS ASSESSED sssa�sssessa ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE STREETS f *f *#5, 763.860 F.F. AT #*0 10.616 EA. = : STORM SEWER (RL) f * #418 SQ.FT. AT ## ##40.078 EA. = STORM SEWER (RM /SC) 41,937 SQ.F1. AT * * *f40.155 EA. = TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = ASSESSMENT ------- - - - - -- f# {411 03 f *#417,166.79 f#046 ASSESSMENT # #014,787.33 * *f *f *f *40.00 ** #439,412.63 ASSESSMENT f *f ;13 f *f*ffff$0 f *4159 ASSESSMENT ------- - - - - -- f# *311,395.14 *#*415 ** *440 ASSESSMENT *H$61 *# 032 f *4300, 3188 39 * *43941481.77 PAGE 1 OF 12 08-04-1987 PROJECT We 83-01'FROST AVE IMP. B I RM — ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT 15-29-22-23-0007 msmmwww=w==w=wmn STREETS * * * * * * * **O o O OO F.F. AT ***$10m676 EAU = ********$O STORM SEWER (RL) *********OwOC.)O SQ. FT. AT * * * *$ 0. 078 EA. = ********$.C),C.)o STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****9 SCE! wFTm AT *****0m155 EA* = ****$1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$1 15-29-22.-23-0008 STREETS *******134oO()6 FwFu AT ***$1 Oo676 EA" 430 a 5E3 STORM SEWER (RL) *********OsC)OO SOwFT. AT * ***$0w 078 EAR = ********$OnOO STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****19 SO.FT. AT ****$0.155 EA" = ****$3, TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *****4 15-29-22-23--R00 STREETS *******124oOOO F&F. AT ***$l0w676 EAR STORM SEWER (RL) *********0 o 000 SO . FT AT ****$0.078 EA, STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****13 SQuFT* AT *****0m155 EAR ****$2 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$3,380 a ^ 6 15-29-22-23-0010 STREETS *********C)oOOO F.F. AT ***$lOs676 EA. ********$C) a or.) STORM SEWER (RL) *********C)uOOO SO. FT. AT ****$0,076 EA, 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****9 SO. FT. AT ****$0.155 EAR ****$l 9 5 37. TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$1, a 60 STREETS ********35oOOC) STORM SEWER (RL) *********C),m 000 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****•(-****C), 000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 15-29-22-23-0018 F a F a AT **,*$l0w676 EAD ******$373. 66 SQwFTm AT ****$0w078 EAR 00 SQuFTm AT ****$(:),155 EA, 00 15-29-22-23-0019 STREETS ***** fit` *25aOC)O F.F. AT ****10s676 EA. = *******266m91 ) STORM SEWER (RL) a 000 SO. FT. AT ****:t.C).C)78 EA. = STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********-0, 00(--) SCI.. FT. AT ****:t.(--).155 EAR TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *******266,90 15-29-22-23-0020 STREETS ********25oOOO F.F. AT * * *$10. 676 EA. = * * * * *- *$2 66.90 STORM SEWER (RL) .********• *OoOC)O SQ. FTm AT ****$OeO7B EA. STORM SEWER (RM/SC) SCI.. FT. AT *****0m155 EA. TOTAL .ASSESSMENT = ******$266,90 08-04-1967 PROJECT NO.9 63-01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM a- ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER STREETS .STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM /SC ) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *** 000 F a F a *********0v00lr-) SQsFT. *********0s000 SCE. FT. RATE ASSESSMENT 15-29-22-23-0021 AT.****l0w676 EAU = ******$266x90 AT ****$0.-078 EA. = ******** AT ****$0m155 EAU ******** 15-29-22-23-0022 STREETS * *******34m000 FmFm AT ****10s676 EAU ******$362m98 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0v000 SQuFTw AT ****$0,078 EAR ********$C) a 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0u000 SQ,FT, AT * ** *: acs, 105 EAR ********$Ono0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *****-*$362w98 15-29-22-23-0023 STREETS *******144s000 F.F. AT ***-$l0u676 EAR 53Z17 a 34 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0m000 SCE. FT. AT ****$0v078 EAR = * *******$Os00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0w000 SQmFTs AT ****$0,155 EAU ********s0, 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$ 9 537e34 15-29-22-23-0038 STREETS *******l88s700 F,F, AT ***$1 On676 EAU *****2 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0R000 SL-.)..FT, AT ****$0,07B EAU (.) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********ou000 SGT ,FT, AT ****:t-0v155 EA, = ********$0 a 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *****2 56 15-29-22-23-0051 STREETS 00 FmFu AT ***$10s676 EA, STORM SEWER (RL) ******-***-0m000 SQ.FT. AT *****0.078 EA, STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *-m-**20 SQ,FTx AT *****OsI55 EA, TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ***** 1 191 a 60 15-29-22-23-0052 m= =m=w=ww=wmwmmn` STREETS' ********80m000 F.F. AT ***$ its. 676 EAU — ******$G54-08 STORM SEWER (RL) *****-****0v000 SQ,FT, AT ** * * :V-0, 1.78 EAR — STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****9 SQsFTm AT *****0m155 EAU *****1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 395m 25 STREETS *******197s000 FwFw STORM SEWER (RL) *********0w000 SQmFTs STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****.9 SQ,FTm TOTAL ASSES 15-29-22-23-0053 AT ***$10*676 EAU AT ****$0m078 EAU )a or-) AT *****0,155 EA. *****1 ****$3 9 55 2, 217 I PROJECT NO. 83-01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM ADELE PAGE . 3 OF 12 08-04-1987 ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STREETS *******127*000 STORM SEWER (RL) ****14,506w000 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0&000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT F. F. AT ***$lOn676 S0wFTU, AT ****$0w078 SQUFT. AT ****s0ml55 15-29-22-32-0001 EA = ****$1j355w85 EAU EAU 00 X-1487m48 15-29-22-32-0002 STREETS *********0u000 FwFe AT ***$10m676 EAU, = *********0, 00 STORM SEWER (RL) *****9 SQmFTw AT ****$0.078 EAU *******773.76 STORM .SEWER (RM/SC) ** ***** **0. 000 SO. FT. AT ****$0.155 EA* ********$on00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * ** *:773.76 15-29-22-32.-0003 STREETS *********0 a 000 F a F a AT ****10o676 EAU = ********$0a00 STORM SEWER (RL) *****9 9 920w000 S0-.wFTw AT ****$0,078 EAU = ******$77:3w76 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *** ******O u OOO SQ,FTu AT *****0.155 EA. = ********$().00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$77/3u76 15-29-22-32-0013 STREETS.- ********87U,000 FuFm AT * * *$1 0.676 EAU *******92E3we1 STORM SEWER (RL) *****9 SGT. FT. AT ****$C)n07B EAU ******$744w74 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) **-*******0m000 SO FT. AT ****$Ou155 EAU = *********0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$1 56 15.-29-22-32--0029 STREETS *****-****0w000 F.F. AT ***$10w676 EAU STORM SEWER (RL) ****10,720m000 SGT. FTw AT ****$0.076 EAU = ******$87"'6,16 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0u000 SQwFTv AT ****$0.155 EA. = *-*-*******0,00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 16 15-29-22-32-0030 STREETS *********0w000 F.F. AT **-*$1 Om676 EAU STORM SEWER (RL) ****10,720m000 SQ,FTm AT ****$0w078 EAU STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********C)&000 SO. AT *****(-.).155 EAU 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ******$E)-36 a 16 15-29-22-32-0031 STREETS *********0w000 FmFu AT ***$10m676 EAU = ********$%.),00 STORM SEWER (RL) ****10 SC-).wFTw AT ****:t-0w078 EAU ******$836el6 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****-X-***C). 000 SO. FT. AT ****$0. 155 EA. 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******:te3 6. 1 6 PAGE 4 OF 12 08-04-1987 PROJECT We 83-01 FROST AVE IMP@ BIRM ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STOR SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT *********0s000 F.F. ****10 SO! wFTv *********0w000 SQwFT& RATE ASSESSMENT 15-29-22-32-0032 AT ***$10v676 EAU = *********o a 00 AT ****$0x07.8 EAU * * * * ** *836. 16 AT ****$Ool55 EAU = *********0,00 15-29-22-32—►036 STREETS *********0m000 F.F. AT ****10.676 EA. = *********0.00 STORM SEWER (RL) .****16 SO. FT. AT ****$0,078 EAU. ****$l 1 254-24 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0, 000 SO. FT. AT ****$0.155 EA** ******"**'$o. 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$1 15-29-22-32-0037 STREETS *********0m000 F.Fm AT ***$lC)n.676 EAU STORM SEWER (RL) ****16 SD..,FTo AT *****0.07B EAU 1 t 254 a 24 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0a000 SO, FT. AT *****0w155 EAU = ********$0 a 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *****1 15.29-22-32-0056 STREETS *********0u000 F.F. AT ***$10.676 EAU — a 00 STORM - SEWER (RL) ****38 Ski .FTm AT ****$C)oC)76 EAU — ****$3 i 003 .62 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0w000 SOoFTw AT ****$0,155 'EA, = * * * * * * **$0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 003 a 62 15-29-22-32-0058 STREETS *********0u000 FoFm AT ***$1 Oo676 EAU = ********$OuOO STORM SEWER (RL) ****14 SC!. FT. AT ****$-(.')w076 EAU = ****$1 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0,000 SO. AT ****$Ool55 EAU ********$()v00 --, ,2(-) TOTAL ASSESSMENT 12:7 151-29-22-32-0076 STREETS- *******373,500 FmFs AT ***$1 Oo676 EAU = ****$3 STORM SEWER (RL) *********rJm000 SO. FT. AT ****$0.078 EA, = ********$0,0(__) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****66 SQwFT, AT ****$C)nl55 EA, = ****l0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT M ***$14 15-29-22-32-0077 STREETS ********.*0 a C)00 F. FU AT ***$lOo676 EA. = *********osc)o STORM SEWER (RL) *********0m000 SGT. FT. AT ****$0.078 EA. * * * * * ** *Ltd ?. 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****49 SO AT *****0ul55 EA. ****s7 7 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$7j65/w78 ro-mut. Z) ur i z Oe-04-1987 PROJECT NO. 83-01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT 15-29-22-32-0078 STREETS *********0m000 FaFe AT ***$,10s676 EA. = ******** STORM SEWER (RL) *********0m000 SG?. FT. AT * * * *$0m 078 EA. = STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****::---4 SQ.FTu AT *****0.155 EA. = *****59296s35 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *****51296m35 15-29-22-32-0079 STREETS *********0a000 F,Fe AT ** *x:10.676 EA. = * * * *4 * * *$O a OO STORM SEWER (RL) *********0w000 SO. FT. AT ****$0m078 EA. = STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****l SQwFTa AT ****$0s155 EA. = ******$289,85 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = a 65 15-29-22o-32-0080 STREETS *********0m000 F.F. AT ***$l0w676 EANS STORM SEWER (RL) *********0u000 SO. FT. AT ****$0.078 EA. STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****15 SOuFT. AT ****$0m155 EA. = ****$2 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * *$ ,429.6: 15-29-22-32-0081 STREETS *********0u000 F.F. AT ****10.676 EA. = *********0w00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0w000 SO. FT. AT *****0u078 EA. = * * * * * * * *V:), 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****12 SO. FT. AT ****$0.155 EA. = ****$1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$1 15-29-22-32-m0082 STREETS *********0v000 FwFu AT ****10s676 EA. STORM SEWER (RL) *-********0v000 SO. FT. AT * * * *V), 078 EA, . 0 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****14 SO. FT. AT ****$0. 155 EA. = ****$2 7 294. 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *****2 00 15-29-22-32-0083 STREETS *********0a000 FaFe AT ****10m676 EA. STORM SEWER (RL) *********0w000 SO. FT. AT ****$0v078 EA. STORM SEWER (RM/SC) 18 9 720 a 000 SGT. FT. AT ****$0 a 155 EA, = ****$2 9(-.)1, 60 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$2 901.60 15-29-22-32-0088 STREETS *********0w000 FuFs AT ****10s676 EA* = ********$0'00 STORM SEWER (RL) ****18 SOvFT. AT *****0e078 EA. = ****$1 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *******i(-*0w000 SO. FT. AT *****-0v155 EA. ********$Qm00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$1 01 08-04-1987 PROJECT NO. 83a--01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM — ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT 15—m29-22-32--0090 STREETS *******ll5u9OO F.F. AT ****10.676 EA. = *****19237s35 STORM SEWER (RL) *******i(-*OoC)(.)C) SG?. FT. AT *** * ::c f. EAU 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****19 SCE!. FT. AT.****$Ool55 EAU : 4 1 969,96 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$41207.30 15-29-22-32-0091 STREETS **-******9ooOOO F.F. AT ***$IC)m676 EAU = ******$960.84 STORM SEWER (RL) *********C).00C) SO. .FT, AT ****$0,078 EA, = ********$0 a 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****15 SGT mFTw AT *****0w155 EAU = ****$2 TOTAL ASSESSMENT W ****$7t 9 434 U 64 15-29-22-32-0092 STREETS *********OaOOC) F.F. AT ***$10.676 EAU = ********$C)nOO STORM SEWER (RL) ****29 SD-..FT. AT ****$0,078 EAR ****$2 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********C) a 000 'SO, FT AT ****$*t --),155 EA, 0C) Q.m a:- 94 96 a TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$2 9 on— 15-29-22-321-0038 STREETS - *******144,OC)O F.F. AT ***$lOo676 3 EAU ****$1 STORM SEWER (RL) *********C) a 000 SO. FT AT ****$0w076 EAU = ********$ S"T"ORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****26,398. 000 SQ. FT. AT ****$0. 155 EA. = ****$4, 091, 69 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 5, 6229. C)'-:* .15-29-22-32-0028 STREETS *******144oOOO FaFe AT ***$10m676 EAU = STORM SEWER (RL) *********OoOOO SQ,FT, AT * * * *:.O, C)78 EA" = STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****26 Std. FT. AT ****sOU155 EAU ****$4 -r TOTAL 40- ASSESSMENT ****$59629. 0 16-29-22-14-0070 STREETS ********BOuOOO F.F. AT ***$10m676 EAU = ******SB54.08 STORM SEWER (RL) SC). FT. AT ****:t.C).C)7L:t EAU = STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****1 0 0 9 640.00 SQwFTs AT ****:V.C) ,, 155 EAU = ****$19649 a 2C) TOTAL ASSESSMENT STREETS *********08000 STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****5 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 16-29-22-14-0071 F.F. AT ***$10.676 EAU SQwFT, AT ****$C).C)7E3 EA, ONO. 00 SQ.FTu AT ****$0,155 EAU = **** **4:84.60 t-'AUL / ut- I z 08-04-1987 PROJECT NO. 83-01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM R- ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL I TEM QUANTITY PER RATE . ASSESSMENT 16-29-22-14-0072 STREETS *********OoOOO FwFw AT ***$1On676 EAU ********$0 STORM SEWER (RL) *********C)sc)oc) SQmFTv AT ****$OoO7B EAR 4w. ********$On 0 c) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****5 SQsFT"- AT ****$0sl55 EAR = -******$824m60 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *******B"74 a 60 STREETS *********C)Ooo(D STORM SEWER (RL) *********C)aoc)o STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****5 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 16-29-22-14-007 F. F . AT ***$10m676 EAR = ********$OUOO SQwFTw AT * * **$O. C)78 EAR Or) SQxFTu AT ****$ 0. 155 EA. ******4;824o6o *******824 16-29-22-14-0077 STREETS *********OaOOO F. mFw AT ****10s676 EAR = *********0noo STORM SEWER (RL) *********06000 SQuFTw AT ****:t.C)aC)78 EAR = ********$C),C.)O STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****33 SQ. FTw AT *****0.155 EAR 5,115moO TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$5,115 a 00 16-29-22-14-0078 STREETS ********90aOC)O FsFu AT ***$10a676 EAU � ******$960oB4 STORM SEWER (RL) *********t.-)nOt.-)C) SQv FT. AT ****:V.0,078 EAR — STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****l(:),BC)OaOOO SQ. FT. AT ****$0.155 EAU = ****$-1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 6 3 4 .8 4 16-29-22-14-0079 STREETS ********75nOO(:) F.F. AT ***$10.676 EA. = ******$800*70 STORM SEWER (RL) *********C).00)O SQ..FT. AT ****$0.078 EA. = **-******$(:)aC)o STORM SEWER (RM/SC). *****9 SQnFTw AT ****$0.155 EAR = ****$1, TOTAL ASSESSMENT 195.70 STREETS ********55oOOO FoF. AT ***$109676 STORM SEWER (RL) *********O.00)C) SQmFT. AT ****:t.OuO7B STORM SEWER (RM/SC) **-***6 SQ.FT, AT ****$k-)ml55 TOTAL ASSESSMENT � 16-29-22-14-0080 EAU EAU EAR *-***$I 9 610m 18 16-29-22-14-0081 .mss =��s�ss�� STREETS *******lt.OaOOO F.F. AT ****10a676 EAU = ****$1 STORM SEWER (RL) *********C)0000 Soo.FT*, AT ****:t.C)*078 EAR = STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****26 SQ. FTu AT ****$0,155 EA, *am *****4 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$5 9 .2-66, 36 rRut d ul- i:e 08-04-1967 PROJECT NO. 83 01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM — ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER. I"" — �_ . � ter. � — � mw 400• ft go. — "_ am- .m "m go. — � STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (FPM /SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * * * * * *60, 000 F.F. *********C)uOOO SO. FT. *****7 Std. FT. RATE ASSESSMENT AT ***$lOn676 EA. *******640 a 56 AT ****:V.C) a 078 EA. *****.***$C) a 00 AT * *** :O. 155 EAU = ****$1 9 116,00 ****$1 16-29-22-14-0083 STREETS ********85oOOO FuFs AT ***$10n,676 EA. _ ******$907*46 STORM SEWER (RL) *********C),000 SQwFTw AT *****0.07e EA. — ********$0000 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****9 SOuFTv AT ****$0.155 EA. = ****$1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****Vg2l 1 302. 46 16-29-22-14-0084 STREETS *********OaOC)O FaFs AT ***$10*676 EA, = ********$OoOC) STORM SEWER (RL) ********,*0 a 000 SO. FT. AT EA. = -0.00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****5,400m000 SO.FT. AT *****0u155 EAs = *******837*00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ******$837m00 16-29-22-14-0085 STREETS * * * * * * * * *O s OOO FmFm AT ****10.676 EA, ********$OoOO STORM SEWER (RL) ***.V.*****(:).C)OC) SO. FT, AT ****tC_).078 EA. STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****5 SQ,FTm AT ****:t.C)ol55 EA. = **-****$B"r7 a 00 I TOTAL ASSESSMENT (30 16-29-22-14-4486 STREETS *********C),00(--) FwF, AT ***$l0x676 EA. STORM SEWER (RL) *********C)o Cat )O SGT. FTm AT *****0,,076 EA* STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****5 a 000 SO. FT AT *****0. 155 EA. = ******$-6'_-7.0C TOTAL ASSESSMENT — ******$83%7, 16-29-22-14-0087 STREETS' *******ll3a570 F.F. AT ***$10,676,EA. = ****:V-1 STORM SEWER (RL) ********-*Ou 000 SQ. FT. AT ****:V.O,(-.)78 EA. STORM SEWER (RM/SC) **-**2(--) SOuFT, AT ****P_-),-155 EA, = ****V.s TOTAL ASSESSMENT *A: 4- STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 16-29-22-14-0088 ********5C) a Oc 0 F.F, AT ***$10.676 EAm *******.**-0, C)OC SO .FT, AT ***V *-.)v078 EA* C) 1 . *$ 1 . 7 4 3% 3 0 9 157 a 0 S 0 , F T, AT ****$0,155 EAU %-!. 14 PAGE 9 OF 12 08-04-1987 PROJECT NO. 83-01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL I TEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STREETS *******146u430 STORM SEWER (RL) * * * * * * ** *cam), rjoc) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ** TOTAL ASSESSMENT -- F. F. AT ***$l0m676 SQ.FT, AT ****$0,076 SQ,FTv AT ****$C)al55 EA. = ****$1 EAU = ****.****$C) EAU = ****$4 16-29-22-14-0091 STREETS 155 a 000 F a F a AT * * *$1 0.676 EAU = *****l STORM SEWER (RL) * * * * * * * * *o' o00 SQuFTv AT 078 EAU ********$C) a 00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****18 SQmFTm AT ****$C)ol55 EAU ****$2 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$4 16-29-22-14-0092 STREETS *******125s000 F.F. AT ***$1 On676 EAU ****$1 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SQ.FTU AT *****0.078 EAU = ********$0w00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****15 SQnFTm AT ****$Oal55 EAU ****$2 TOTAL ASSESSMENT *****3 16-29-22-14-0094 STREETS *******240ul00 FaFs AT ***$1().676 EAU ****$2 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.000 SQUFT. AT * * * *$C). C)78 EA. = ********$Omc)c) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *-***l5 SQaFT. AT ****$0.155 EA, = ****s2 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = . . ****$4 60 16-29-22-41-0031 STREETS *****l FaFs AT ****10w676 EAU ***$13 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0v000 SQ. FTm AT ****$0.078 EAU = ********$0w00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *1 9 025 9 947m000 SQsFTa AT ****$0ml55 EAU **$159, TOTAL ASSESSMENT -- * *$17 , 0 8 a 36 16-29-22-42-0001 STREETS *******1309000 F.F. AT ***$10.676 EAU ****$1 v 387w88 STORM SEWER (RL) *********OUOC)O SQmFTv AT ****$0m078 EAU ********:t.c)uc)c) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****77 SCE.. FT. AT ****$0.155 EAU = ***$11 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * *$13, =39.78 16-29-22-42-0002 s= s =aa=aar�ss =a :cress STREETS ***-****.l3OaOOO F.F. AT * * *$ 10.676 EAU STORM SEWER (RL) *********0w000 SO..nF AT ****$0,078 EA, = ********$0w00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****25 SQsFTm AT ** * *:$0u 155 EAU ****$3 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$59279,78 PAGE 1Q OF 12 08-04-1987 PROJECT NO. 83-01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM -- ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL I TEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STREETS * * * * * ** 17.o w 000 STORM SEWER (RL) * * * * * * * * *C). 00c) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****51 TOTAL ASSESSMENT FwFe AT ***$10s676 SO. FT. AT ****$0m078 SOwFTm AT *****0xl55 16-29-22-42-0003 EAU = EAU = ********$C) EAU = * * * * *7,920w 96 ****$9q3OBw84 16-29-22-42-0004 STREETS *******l40s000 F.F. AT ****10.w676 EAU ****s1 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0e000 SOuFTw AT ****$0w078 EAw = ********$0m00 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****14 SOuFTw AT *****0s1 55 EAU ****$2 9 .?78.97 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ***-*$-7.-,,773.60 16-29-22-42-0005 = `_= =� = =�= =sus= STREETS *********0 000 F . F' AT ***$10m676 EAU .********$O000 STORM SEWER (RL) *********On 000 SC. FT AT ****$0.078 EAU = * * * * * * * *$O, o0 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****lC) SGT ,FT, AT ****$C)ul55 EAm = ****$1 q 612m00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ***-*$1 9 612 a 00 16-29-22-42-0006 STREETS *********0wC)0o F.F. AT ****10m676 EAU STORM .SEWER (RL) *********0w000 SQUFT, AT ****$0w076 EA. = *********0Uo0 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****7 j 800, 000 SO, FT, AT ***.**0,155 EAU *****1 9 209, 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$l 9 209 u 00 16-29-22-42-0007 STREETS *********OaOOO FaFe AT ***$IC)u676 EAU 00 STORM SEWER (RL) *********0m000 SQ.FT. AT ****$0,078 EAU ********$C) a 0c) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *****7 SO- ,FT, AT ****$C),155 EAR = ****:t. 1 9 209 a 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT — ****:t. 1, 209 a 00 16-29-22-42-040e STREETS. *********0x000 F.F. AT ***$10,676 EAU ********$Ono() STORM SEWER (RL) ****** * **0a C-)00 SO, FT, AT ****$0,078 EAU = ********$C)U0c) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****10 SQ,FTU AT ****$0,155 EA, ****$1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT * ** *$1,612. 16-29-22-42-0009 STREETS ********94s1 00 FoFm AT ***$l0u676 EAU = ****$1 STORM SEWER (RL) ****l0 SO- oFTm AT *****0w078 EAU = * * * ** *$787. 18 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0,000 SO. FT. AT ****$0.155 EAU = TOTAL ASSESSMENT *****1q79lo79 PROJECT NOs 83-01 FROST AVE IMP. B I RM ADELE ASSESSMENTtROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER STREET STORM SEWER (RL) - STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = *********OaOOO F.F. ****lOsOBOoOOO SQwFTw *********09000 SQmFTs STREETS STORM SEWER (RL)- STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREETS STORM- SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT I STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT — STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT -- STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREETS STORM SEWER (RL) STORM SEWER (RM/SC) TOTAL ASSESSMENT rHul= 1 1 ur I z 06-04-1987 RATE ASSESSMENT 16-29-22-42-0010 o mmummmmmmmmummm AT ***$lOo676 EA. = ********$ AT ****$0,m078 EAU = ******$7B6n24 AT *****0w155 EAU = ********$O *******766,24 *********OaOOO F.F. AT ***$lOa676 EAU ****10,060,000 SQ,FT, AT ****$O.C)78 EAU *********OuOOO SQwFTw AT * * * *$(), 155 EAU FoFs AT ****10.676 EAR 19 9 200 a 000 SO a FT a AT ****$0,078 EA& *********08000 SQwFTs AT *****0.155 EA* *******123a1OO F'. F. AT ***$10,676 EAR ****13 SQ,FT. AT ****$C)nC)76 EAU *********OuOOO SQ,FTa AT ****$0.155 EA* *******l60aOBO Fa Fe AT ***$10.676 EAU ****34 SQ.FT. AT ****$O.C)78 EAR *********O,OOC) SQ.FT. AT ****$0*155 EA* ** F.F. AT ***$l0w676 EAU ****12,006.000 SQ,,FT. AT ****$(:)oC)76 EAR *********OeOOC) SO..nFTs AT ****$(--)nl55 EAU *********OoOOC) F. uFs AT ****10a676 EAR ****12 SQ.FT,, AT ****$0w078 EAR **-*******OaOOO SQ,FT, AT ****$Oal55 EAR 16-29-22-42-0011 ********$OU 00 *******786,24 ********$0 a 0C.) * * * * ** *786.4 16•29-22-42-0014 ********$OSC)O ****$l, ********$0 a 00 *****1 16-29-22-42-0015 ****$l ****$1 1 058. 6. ********$0 a 00 X- 9 372a 83 16-29-22-42-0017 1 ,7(:)9.01 7,A-:--'B, 75 16-29-22-42-0018 ********$C) , 00 ******$936,47 *** * * *$9 %6.47 16-29-22-42-0019 ********$0000 ******$936, 47 ********$0000 * ** * *$9'6,47 PAGE 12 OF 12 08-04-1987 PROJECT NO. 83--01 FROST AVE IMP. BIRM — ADELE ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT 16-29-22-42-0057 STREETS **.*******0w000 F.F. AT ***$lOn676 EAU ********$0U00 STORM SEWER (RL) ****51 SQwFTs AT ****$OoO78 EAU = *****3 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0s000 SQuFTu AT ** EAU TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$3j986v03 16-29-22-42-0065 STREETS *********0m000 FaFs AT ****10.676 EAU = ********$0wo0 STORM SEWER (RL) ****10, OOO S0..FTw AT ****$0,078 EA* = ******$811v20 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *********0w000 SQmFT. AT ****$On 155 EAU = ********$0.w00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * * * *$811r20 16-29-22-42-0066 STREETS *********0w000 F. F. AT ***$l0e676 EAU — *********OsoO S TORM SEW (RL) ****14 SQuFTw AT ****$0.078 EA. = **** STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *.********OnOOO SQmFTn AT ****$Owl55 EAU = ********$0w00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * ** **1,146.8 16-29-22-42-0079 STREETS * * * * * ** l 60 a O8O FaFt AT ***$10w676 EAU = ****$l STORM SEWER (RL) *********OsOOO SQwFTs AT ****$0,078 EA, ********$0,00 STORM-SEWER (RM/SC) ****37 SQwFTm AT *****0.155 EAU = *****5 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 7 9 5'42-7 a 4 C) 16-29-22-42-0080 STREETS *********0, 000 F. F. AT ***$10.676 EAU STORM SEWER (RL) *********0.0(.-)0 SQwFTu AT ****$0.07B EA, = ********:t.C)nC)O STORM SEWER (RM/SC) ****21 SQ,FTm AT ****$0,1'55 EA, = ****$3 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ****$3 a 07 82 PARCELS ASSESSED GRAND TOTALS STREETS *****5 F.F. AT ****10.676 EAU ***$61,534.9/ STORM SEWER (RL) ***418 SQwFTw AT ****$(.-).C)7E3 EAU ****32 STORM SEWER (RM/SC) *1 SQxFT, AT ****$()ol55 EA. **$300 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = **$3949481m77 40L4 1.1 6� 30 tool. 4 y lxq ion � � r Z 2 � �° LA 0 "CL 17 o57r V" V) 3 to 3 � W t 4 3t ui 15 IZ4 g off •,• � ... fi 2 q `-11 -- � __ etb.1s 114 ...g ; g Zg .3 � ,�• - k I N 0 TAT -� _ 17 M1 0 RYAN 0 • $8 ec (35) 40 6 1 ''O 02 '�jy �j11 1 � I 30 � _' •t Z7 2re 25 (30 4 ( G G' g 3 4( 1 ,) V 1 0 w 1 Q �� J 1. p -1--j?. s - - - _ sc Noo L, . J Ta E- 1 st . ec. 6 "� � a3 �� X1.1 14 2 7 rar0 i ., is � r 3 ► 1a p ' 1 ► u 1 'S r4 : S c - A Q/Q 15 29-w-22- 23 ASSESSMENT MAP IMPROVEMENT 8 FROST AVENUE (Adele St. to Birmingham St.) SCALE N N/A 4 3� 1 ' r ( 44D) 3 46 . 1 t� , u i w. I ` ('5) 11 t � .� 1 04) r p • 15 �•' / 14 I 0 • 3 (51 24 = 1 23 1 5 22 , ti 1O 10 W it p t F- C--- It(53) -- t 13 ;!4c 1 • 14 K 40L4 1.1 6� 30 tool. 4 y lxq ion � � r Z 2 � �° LA 0 "CL 17 o57r V" V) 3 to 3 � W t 4 3t ui 15 IZ4 g off •,• � ... fi 2 q `-11 -- � __ etb.1s 114 ...g ; g Zg .3 � ,�• - k I N 0 TAT -� _ 17 M1 0 RYAN 0 • $8 ec (35) 40 6 1 ''O 02 '�jy �j11 1 � I 30 � _' •t Z7 2re 25 (30 4 ( G G' g 3 4( 1 ,) V 1 0 w 1 Q �� J 1. p -1--j?. s - - - _ sc Noo L, . J Ta E- 1 st . ec. 6 "� � a3 �� X1.1 14 2 7 rar0 i ., is � r 3 ► 1a p ' 1 ► u 1 'S r4 : S c - A Q/Q 15 29-w-22- 23 ASSESSMENT MAP IMPROVEMENT 8 FROST AVENUE (Adele St. to Birmingham St.) SCALE N N/A i w 4 6 O LS �• •. 5 In L • -- -- '�'' °Q mot, 15 t4 is tj 130 3,0 V-1 4 , ..__. 0 6 O ' 1 7—(13 30 o ar q- I . Z + Z'.! 12 a 2 T 2 5 •r H o � 2 � � 61.55 s3 — ---�- +f_ � ____ -- — r o 20 a� (3� 8 8 ._........� 9 1 1 .--- ______ i A— _ 1 0 . 23 r s-IN (- 1 O _ ... -- _ ' z2 1 20 s �— . 2 � is q�. � � � � 9 �' � ` (32.) 12 35), 1 (10 1 j , - �-- y�-- ,t —.____ _.. 19 i v 4 D6TO e�,� i 4• • 13 �8 r • 1 � 1$ �i i Z4. 2 13 a 1 5 1 0 0 —� 4 ` .4 15 t6 g cb SUMMER 4 r9 N ti If v 1 zt�s9 +Q� -- c 9; C .� _ r 1 30 ° 0 �° � ■ "f 27 + = 4 ♦ 2 �` ' c N �' 2 ' 29 30 -4 .� Ass- , - � � �! 39 2 I 2 9 �51 • 2 �� x''( 29 = � 2 7 = 6 , �x • - V� i 4 �~ (85) to ., 12 i ____ 14 -` -`�' 00 P) i 26 V _— �141 Do Z5 i 6 Ny Nunn Z4 _', Z 4 u 77 — �(?A 2 Q --- �42� (' 22 9 (tb) Z2 IL 0 20 12 (-I 1 � 1 �j : � (mil 12 19 + j �--- I • 1.` - 0) 1 I ! 9 1 (45 3 I (47) - -- -- y0:1- 17 14 o 17 � I 17 14 p SC $D 30 i 3 s �� 4 f�7 ONION' —r , 40 I CS „ v &o i�4 I I 1 16 �� I rob M '/4 C/1 1 ♦• ^ FKA � _ 0 Q/Q 15 32 ASSESSMENT MAP SCALE IMPROVEMENT 83 -01 FROST AVENUE N/A (Adele St. to Birmingham St,) e f fro % (4 8) �4-� r n • 29�. a C a 1a - ) $ i p 9 3 0 5 o r . 1I� (n <�1 4 r0 M t 4 IS 31 (Y* 13 (.3.) 2 <) (-) C) a 22 W 12 (Xc) J� 1 ♦. e0 �2) 3 6A s ( • 32 s � Is Cam) o s ° R C 1 5 6 3) \e 4 N 40 r s (a \ A- 3 3 5 03T: , (, 9 a 7 9 3 - 20 (47) 2ja i lot Ion 18 19 3c D 17 C&I r 35 = 10 3° (od) 1 S 1 d (� In 4-) -- ' 51 0 _. 0 1 13 14 (2� !� o ,To r 3 6 o Z �} „13 o .0 1 (b2) RYAN •. � 50 g 37' z� O 47 4WOO-10, 481 . o ti 42 43 I6 ( '� z) 41 1 , ... 3a 40 N . M M l • Vol 1 wo�o� 14 - I CY - { ,n • l 0 1 S 10 10 (74) I too 10 loll 000- t os Z a X to �� 1693 2— j �• •u= 03 feeffew g o 70 _ ., �.- _.......- 1 _ 4 = . ..- , s • to _.,_.,. _ _ 1 C 2 s v.. • , r - 1 1 Z _ l efeeff " , S 1 g 7 — Q om , •• 1 ° J 8 '7 G 4 1A - - - 2 ! ---- -- ?64 .32 n • -� 08 M ? ' 1 1 �•Ob- Q/Q C 1 V i • 7 1 t •• .. �_. ASSESSMEN M AP .- IMPROVEMEN SCALE N 83 - - 01 FROST AVENUE N/A (Adele St. to Birmingham St.) — 1 1 1 Y >' of LI L J 4 4 • G O „ .. .. 13 A 31 L illblwbfim 3 o 7 i n • • 5 r • qq f. r�wa 9 Iwo r do N I � O r r — i 1 0 . t 30 30 2 60 40 1 3o � 14, IZ t 1 10 9 1 G 5 4 5 oi Ib 111 I IG Ll 5 1 13 IZ 11 to 15 b 7 5 , VI r I / 3) AO 14 � ' r � E � � D D � 1 - - _ ._ I AAftw '4 •� - - • %3 14 15 1G 11 16 19 2.0 21 122 •19 20 ZI Z2., 23 P-4 Z 2GI 21 I 28I t= Z (2) Ll o (u� Gz3� 19 f�1 �t, c� M g !SO « N N N r • 1 0 �� N N �� •� 0 Z 30 i a oft lk fm r " • M � _ O. 1015 ro 0 155 W4 TA 0 34 1 2. 45 - i S m (9 ) .I Cruel (40) 16�29�22 Q 41 Q e • 4 SCALE N/A P "' ► rr so 10 Coo 27: Go tn 0 12 I or! O 2 -- --- �.1„ E 30 _.... I 9 � 12 � 9 rL 13 14 a A 13 64 — -7 (10) 14 '7 14 1 15 I�5 S —; ! L ? - 17 4 A Aj O S ? $00 FENTON 11 ,o AVE, 3 (110 •.3 (40 1 Z 13 8 a 1 9 g 1Z 9 ' a 4 T 7 G�1 I---- L .�, -- 1 � IG 1 IG N t S r0 (44.) 1 cr I -- -- 3 W ) 19 2�3) • w ` SO 9 I I o 1 30 A 40 1 tl�� q I 30 O """'.. O � .. v c� r - 5 4 f, < 0 �j r Ir ✓ 04 0 3 Z { t 2 ' Z t IS (73) 2-q G c �- "J ( 3 1 1 14� �2) 3 14 • Go t ��>� Q t R D 13 to 1.4 4 o � T � i — _..._ . — ;G (31) �3 t)�9 . �' - - 4� 40 4o a. l 5 / 12 Po 5 12 t tj >!6) 5 ) s• 4 I I 14 j 11 �7I) G { 1 • 1z o E 4 (3s�2 3� o <4 )I S� 60 = (5') 7 t ID i 10 31)11 2 ►, 3 ��, (0o a-' A s Q r o G 9 om/ Z .°RIPLE Q 4 1 O p � 1 LOOKOUT AV E . N V SO (30) i ��}� PARK 40 i I 1co o c olo ) t g 5o .-..- � 0 3 1 j ' D -7;� AY) L...� A /o . F Q/ Q 16 42 ASSESSMENT MAP SCALE IMPROVEMENT 83 FROST AVENUE N/A (A dele St, to Birmingham � _ gham St,) RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city counc i 1 has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the reconstruction of Frost Avenue from Adele Street to Birmingham Street with street, curb and gutter and storm sewer as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 83- 01, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual install- ments extending over a period of 20 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1988, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution, To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1988. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420,051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. A Number AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM* Assistant Cit En Frost Avenue Reconstruction Cit Project 83-01 Easement A DATE: Au 4, 1987 INTRODUCTION Action b Couftei1o.1 Endorsed Modified Rejecters-.- Date A final a has been reached with Glacier Park Compan for the pond easement ac for the Frost Avenue reconstruction project. Council approval of pa is re BACKGROUND On October 27, 1986, the cit council approved the pa of $206,440 to Glacier Park Compan the real estate division of Burlin Northern Railroad Compan for the purchase of the pondin easement. This pa e a $1.00 per s foot settlement which was the cit appraiser's estimate of value. The settlement was reached prior to a condemnation hearin On April 7, 1987, the cit attorne received notification from Glacier Park's attorne that the Frank Street easement, which parallels the Glacier Park propert on the west, did not allow for public pondin purposes. The Glacier Park attorne also claimed that le precedence existed such that b constructin the pond the cit had, in effect, vacated the easement back to Glacier Park because the intended use of the easement, taken in 1959, was for street, water lines or sewer lines. Glacier Park claimed a value of $1.00 per s foot for the 30 feet accruin to them or a total pa of $27,843, The staff response to Glacier Park's claim was that the value paid in 1959 for the easement e to a public use of Frank Street and that an current value attached would be si reduced based on the 1959 pa Glacier Park r that the entire q uestion includin the $206,44► settlement be returned to the district court for consideration and that three independent appraisers be appointed as commissioners to determine Glacier Park's interest from the takin The cit staff countered with a proposal to attach a 25% value to the pondin purposes easement which would involve a $7,000 pa to Glacier Park for revisin the easement on Frank Street and avoidin futher liti The cit attorne research indicated that similar cases have established values of 45% to 100% althou differin circumstances applied in certain cases. A meetin was held on Jul 21 with Glacier Park to attempt to ne a settlement prior to incurrin liti costs. Followin a number of exchan involvin prices, values and le precedences, it was a that a settlement price of $17,500 would be presented as compensation for revisin the Frank Street easement and the ori $1.00 per s foot settlement would not be reopened. Since that meetin the Glacier Park Compan has notified the cit the will accept the $17,500 settlement, ALTERNATIVES 1.0 Approve the a settlement pa of $17,500 and finalize the easement a 2. Reject the settlement and order condemnation proceedin and liti to determine Glacier Park's interest in the propert and Frank Street,, DISCUSSION Alternative One ma be the least cost approach. Reopenin the condemnation proceedin for the Frank Street q uestion could be the approach used except Glacier Park has notified the cit that the will not execute the ori settlement of $1.00 per s foot (the $206,440 pa without an a on Frank Street, The difficult with reopenin the entire proceedin is that there is the potential for the court appointed appraisers to return a condemnation award hi than $1.00 per s foot. The cit on this project has approved and executed easements for $1.50 to $2.00 per s foot for other easements. An unfavorable jud b the appraisers could easil cost the cit $100,000 even if nothin was awarded for the Frank Street easement. Thus, it appears the costs and chances of losin far outwei the cost of this settlement, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the council approve pa of $17,500 to Glacier Park Compan to clarif the Frank Street easement b passin the attached resolution, BUDGET IMPACT The cost of the $17,500 settlement have been included as project costs for the assessment hearin earlier on the a If the council rejects this settlement and an unfavorable decision is returned b the appraisers an costs above the $17,500 would probabl be incurred a existin cit funds because assessment rates are near or at the maximum sustainable levels, jc RESOLUTION APPROVING EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the council has ordered made City Project 83 -01, Frost Avenue Reconstruction, and WHEREAS, the council has levied assessments against benefited property for all.or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, easements are required for the project on property owned by Burlington- Northern, Inc, through its real estate division, the Glacier Park Company, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that payment in the amount of $17,500 is hereby approved to Burlington - Northern, Inc, and the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to execute an easement agreement for acquisition of said easements. MEMORANDUM TO: City Mana FROM: Director Of Communit Development SUBJECT. Tax-Exempt. Financing-HealthEast DATE: Au 3, 1987 Introduction 1 47 -C-7 Acti b Ct) Un()jI # . 0 Modified..... Re"i ected.- Date HealthEast has requested cit approval for $160 in tax-exempt f inancin Most of this mone would be used to ref i-nance current debt, $10,000,000 of this mone would be used to renovate and expand Ste John's Northeast Hospital at Beam Avenue and Hazelwood. Emplo would increase from 275 to 460 full-time and 145 to 350 part-time* Construction would start in October, 1988 and be completed b October, 1989, Back Council previousl approved tax-exempt financin for Ste John's Northeast Hospital in 1982, Discussion This project meets all the cit requirements for tax-exempt financin except one. Desi review board aproval is re prior to or concurrentl with preliminar approval for tax'-exempt financin HealthEast will not be read for desi review board approval for several months. Staff recommends waivin this requirement, • because: 1. Most of this financin is to refinance current debt, 20. The desi review board has alread reviewed the main hospital, 3. The proposed expansion would not affect ad properties. HealthEast feels that the cannot wait with their financin approval until buildin plans are drawn and approved b the • desi review board, because the complexit of this project re certain time schedules to be met. (Refer to the article on pa Recommendation Approval of the attached resolution (pa 2 ) and consent a (pa 10 ) to allow the St. Paul HRA to issue an approximate amount of $16,0 in tax-exempt revenue bonds, of which $6212OOrOOO applies to Maplewood. Approval is subject to compliance with the cit tax- exempt financin criteria (pa 18 } . kd Attachments is Resolution 2e Consent A 3. Cit Re for Tax-Exempt Financin 4, Newspaper Article 567N HealthEast THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLIEWOOD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL-FOR A PROJECT AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT (HealthEast Obligated Group Project) It is hereb found, determined and declared.: (a) Under the enactment b the Minnesota Le lature of Chapter 474 of the Minnesota Statutes, which is cited as the "Municipal Industrial Development Act" (the "Act "), Minnesota Laws of 1980, Chapter 595, the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "Cit and The Housin and Redevel- opment Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul, Minnesota (the "HRA") are authorized to issue health care facilities revenue bonds to finance properties, real or personal whether or not now in existence, used or useful in connection with a revenue- producin enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, en in providin health care services; and (b) In enactin the Act the Legislature found that the welfare of the State of Minnesota re the active promotion, attraction, encoura and development-of economicall sound industr and commerce to prevent, as far as possible, the emergenc of blight and areas of chronic unemplo and to prevent economic deterioration; that new areas of emplo opportunit for educated y outh of the communities in those communities should be retained and created; and that the welfare of the State of Minnesota re provision of necessar welfare and health care facilities, to the end that ade health care services be made available to residents of the state at reasonable cos (c) Actin on the basis of the common powers of the Cit and the HRA conferred b the Act HealthEast (the 2 Attachment 1 "Borrower") has proposed that the Cit and the HRA enter into a consent a under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 pursuant to which the HRA, actin pursuant to the Consent 'Agreement, would issue health care facilities revenue,bonds (the "Revenue Bonds") to (i) finance the ac and construction of hospital and related health care facilities, includin land, buildin improvements to buildin and e and other movable personal propert to be ac b Borrower or a wholl subsidiar or affiliate of Borrower, and located at, or used in connection with, existin facilities maintained b Borrower or a' wholl owned subsidiar or affiliate of Borrower in the Cities of Maplewood and Saint Paul (ii) to dischar certain indebtedness previousl .incurred •b Borrower or a wholl owned subsidiar or affiliate of Borrower with respect thereto and (iii) to refund the HRA's Medical Facilities Revenue Notes, Series 1980 (Bethesda Lutheran Medical Center Project), the HRA's Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982, Series A (Bethesda Lutheran 'Medical Center Project), the HRA's Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982, Series B (Bethesda Lutheran Medical center Project), aportion of the HRA's Hospital Facilit Revenue Refundin Bonds (Carondelet Communit Hospitals, Inc.), Series 1985-A. a portion of the HRA's Hospital Facilit Revenue Bonds (Carondelet Communit Hospitals, Inc,) ,Series 1985-B, the HRA's Hospital Revenue Refundin Bonds (Baptist Hospital Fund Incorporated -- Midwa Pro Series 1982-A, the Cit of Maplewood's Hospital Revenue Bonds (Health Resources Hospital Corporation), Series 1983, the Cit of Maplewood's Tender Option Hospital Refundin Bonds, Series 1985 (Health Resources Hospital Corporation), the Port Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul's Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1984-D (St. Joseph's Hospital Project), and the Port Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul's Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1984 (Bethesda Lutheran Medical Center Project); and (d) The Borrower has proposed that the HRA issue one or more series of its Revenue Bonds in one or more series for the purpose of financin the Project, includin certain incidental expenses thereto, in an approximate maximum aggre principal amount of $160,000,000; of which it is presentl estimated that a maximum aggre amount of $62,200,000 in Revenue Bond proceeds will be expended on hospital and related health care 'facilities within the Cit and the proposal calls for the Borrower to enter into a revenue agreement wherein the Borrower and/or subsidiar or affiliated or related corporations of or to the Borrower will be obli to make pa under the revenue agreement at 3 the times and in the amounts sufficient to provide for the I prompt pa of principal of, premium, if an and interest o n the Revenue Bonds and all costs and expenses of the Cit and the HRA incident to the issuance and sale of the..Revenue Bonds; and . (e) . The undertakin of the.proposed Project and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance the cost thereof will further promote the public purposes and le objectives of the Act by providin substantial inducement for the continuation of the health care operations of the Borrower in the Cit and the Cit of Saint Paul; and (f) Neither the full faith and credit of the Cit nor the, full faith and credit of the Cit of Saint Paul or the HRA will be pled or responsible for the Pro 0 j ect or for the pa of the principal of, premium, if an and interest on the Revenue Bonds; and (g) The Cit pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 474-01, Subdivision 7b did publish a notice, a cop of which with proof of publication is on file in the office of the Cit Clerk of the Cit cit Hall, Maplewood, Minnesota, o f the public hearin on the proposal of the Borrower that the HRA, actin pursuant to the Consent Agreement, finance the Project and the Cit did conduct a public he pursuant to said notice, at which hearin all persons who appeared at the ,hearin were given an opportunit to express their views with respect to the proposal which notice, publication and hearin are hereb in all respects approved; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b the Cit Council of the City of Maplewood,, Minnesota (the "Cit Co, uncil") as follows: 1. The Cit Council hereb gives preliminar approval to the proposal of Borrower that the HRA, actin pursuant to the Consent Agreement, issue the Revenue Bonds in one or more series pursuant to the Act, and pursuant to a revenue agreement (the "Revenue Agreement") between the FIRA and Borrower (and/or related or affiliated .corporations to the Borrower) upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessar so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pa when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the total maximum aggregate principal amount of approximatel $160,000,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the Project; 4 2. On the basis of information available to this Cit Council it appears, and the Cit Council hereb finds, that the Project constitutes propertie real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producin enterprisin en in providin health care services within the meanin of Subdivision Ic of Section 474.02 of the Act;- that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the availabilit of the financin under the Act and willin of the HRA, actin pursuant to the Consent A to furnish s uch financin - was a substantial inducement to Borrower to undertake the Pro and that the effect of such financin if undertaken, will be to assure that ade health care services will be made available to the residents of the state at reasonable costs and will otherwise further those other purposes set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.019 3. The Project is hereb g iven. preliminar approval b the Cit subject to the approval of the Project b the Minnesota Commissioner of Trade and Economic. Development, and subject to the final approval b the HRA, Borrower and the purchasers or underwriters of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financin of the Project* 4. In accordance with Subdivisions 7a and 9 of the Section 474.01 Minnesota Statutes, the Cit hereb authorizes and re the HRA to submit, pursuant to the Consent A the proposal for the Pro to the State Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development re approval; and other officers, emplo and a of the Cit are hereb authorized to cooperate with the HRA in closin and to provide the Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development with such preliminar information as he ma re 5. Borrower has a and it is hereb determined that an and all costs incurred b the Cit in connection with the financin of the Pro whether or not the Pro is carried to completion and whether or not approved b the State Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development will be paid b Borrower, 6. The ori purchaser of each series of Bonds, and Bri and Mor Professional Association, actin as bond counsel, are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessar documents relatin to the Project, to consult with the attorne of the HRA, the Borrower and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and 9 as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessar documents and to submit such documents to the HRA for final approval; 7. Nothin in this resolution or in the documents pre- pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of an municipal funds on the Pro other than. the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the Cit for this purpose or authorize issuance of the Revenue Bonds on behalf of the Cit The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a char lien or encumbrance, le or equitable, upon an propert or funds of the Cit the Cit of Saint Paul, or the HRA excep , nor t the revenue and proceeds pled to the pa thereof shall the Cit the Cit of Saint Paul or the HRA be subject to an liabilit thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the ri to compel an exercise of the taxin power of the Cit the Cit of Saint Paul or the HRA to pa the outstandin principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce pa thereof against an propert of the Cit the Cit of Saint Paul or the HRA. The .Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds includin interest thereon is pa solel from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the pa thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the Cit the City of Saint Paul, or the HRA within the meanin of an constitutional or statutor limitation; .8. The actions of the City's staff in causin public notice of the public hearin and in describin the general nature of the Project and estimatin the principal amount of the Revenue Bonds to be issued to finance the Project and cooperatin with the HRA in preparin a draft of the proposed application to the State Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development, for approval of the Project, which has been available for inspection b the public in the office of the Cit Clerk, Cit Hall Maplewood, Minnesota, from and after the publication of notice of the hea.rin are .in all respects ratified and confirmed, 9. The Ma and Cit Clerk of the Cit are hereb authorized and directed to enter into and execute on behalf of the Cit a Consent Agreement for the Project in substantiall the form presented to the Cit at this meetin Adopted b the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, this 10th da of Au 1987, R EXHIBIT A Maximum Aggre Governmental Unit Amount Havin Jurisdic- of O to be Obli - tion ver Area In Initial 0 - S Which Facilit is-- or Located Address of respect to Ope ator Facil Facilit 'Cit of Saint Paul i City of Saint Paul lCit of Saint Paul 'Cit of Saint Paul ,Cit of Maplewood Baptist Hospital Fund, Inc. Bethesda Lutheran Medical Center and Bethesda Lutheran Hospital, Inc, 1700 W. Universit Avenue St. Paul, MN 559 Capitol Boulevard St. Paul, MN 69 West Exchan St. St. Paul ,.MN 403 Maria Avenue St. Paul, MN 1575 Beam Avenue Maplewood, MN $37 $21,100,000 $34,500,00 $4,400,000 St. Joseph's Hospital St. John's Lutheran Hospital Association St. John's Northeast Communit Hospital $62,200,000 567N CERTIFICATE, I, Lucille J. Aurelius, the dul appointed/elected, q ualified and actin Cit Clerk of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereb certif that the attached Resolution was dul adopted at the re meetin of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood,. held on Au 10, 1987, and is a true and correct cop of the Resolution adopted at said meetin and on file'and of record in the official Minutes of said Cit Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m hand and the seal of said Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota this da of r 19870 I do further certif that I am dul authorized to execute this certificate. Lucille J. Aurelius [SEAL) VIIJ 509X HealthEast CONSENT AGREEMENT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF HEALTHEAST THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 1st da of Au 1987, b and between The Housin and Redevelopment Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul, Minnesotai, . (the "HRA") a bod corporate and politic organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota a r municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1. Statement of Purpose and Powers.to be Exercised. Under the enactment b the Minnesota Legislature of Chapter 474 of the Minnesota Statutes, which is cited as the "Municipal Industrial Development Act" (the "Act"), Minnesota Laws of 1980, Chapter 595, the HRA and the Cit of Maplewood are each authorized to issue revenue bonds, to make all con- tracts necessar or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted to it under the Act and to enter into inter mental agreements relatin to, amon other thin the financ- in of projects under the Act and the refundin of bonds previousl issued under the Act at or prior to the maturit date thereof, 10 Attachment 2 In enactin the Act the Le found that the welfare of the State of Minnesota re the active promo- tion, attraction, encouragement and development of-economical- l sound industr and commerce to prevent, as far as possible, the emer of bli and areas of chronic unemplo and to prevent economic deterioration and that the welfare of the state re the provision of necessar medical and health care facilities, to the end that ade health care services be made available to residents of the state at reasonable costs,* Factors necessitatin the active pro'motion and development of such medical and health care facilities within the Cit of Maplewood and the Cit of St. Paul are the in- creasin concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidl risin increase in the amount and cost of medical and health care services re to meet the needs of the increased population. In accordance with the Act, HealthEast, on behalf of itself and other members of the Obli Group (collective) y , the "Borrower") has proposed that the HRA and the Cit of Maplewood enter into a consent a under the Act pursu- ant to which the HRA would issue one or more series of revenue bonds (the "Revenue Bonds") to (i) finance the ac and construction of hospital and related health care facilities, 11 includin land, buildin improvements to buildin and e and other movable personal propert to be a c q uired b Borrower or a subsidiar or affiliate of Borrower and located at, or used in connection with, existin facilities maintained b Borrower or 'a subsidiar affiliate of Borrow- er in the City of Saint Paul or the Cit of Maplewood (ii to dischar an indebtedness previousl assumed b Borrower or a subsidiar or affiliate of Borrower with respect thereto; and (iii) to refund certain outstandin issues identified in the Indenture (hereinaf defined) previousl issued b HRA, the Port Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul and the Cit of Maplewood, under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 for the benefit of the Borrower or a subsidiar or affiliate of Bor- rower (collectivel the "Project"). The undertakin of the Project and % the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance the cost thereof will further promote the public purposes and legislative objectives of the Act b providin substantial inducement for the continuation and improvement of the health care operations of the Borrower in the Cit of Saint Paul and the Cit of Maplewood, The powers to be exercised b the HRA-under this Agreement are those identical powers conferred upon the HRA and the Cit of Maplewood in the Act and in particular the power of the HRA to issue the Revenue Bonds to finance the Project, 12 2. Method by Achievi Purpose; M anner of Exercising Power The HRA and the City Council of the City f.Ma lewood Y P have each adopted a resolution approving the proposal and authorizing the issuance of the Revenue Bonds by the HRA pursuant to a joint powers agreement, in an amount not to exceed approximately $160,000,000 to finance the Pro The HRA shall.exercise the powers of the Act b adopt a ro Y P g, PP - v ing and executing such resolutions documents and agreements g nts as. shall be necessary or convenient to issue and sell the Revenue Bonds and such other resolutions, documents and agree- ments as shall be necessary or required in connection with the issuance of the Revenue Bonds and the ivin effect to g g or carrying out the provisions of the agreements and other docu- ments under which the Revenue Bonds are issued and/or secured. d. Said Revenue Bonds shall not be deemed issued on behalf of the City of Maplewood, and .accordin� l the HRA shall g y 11 be solely responsible for the issuance of the Bonds as herein P rovided and may take such action as if deems appropriate without further action being taken by the City f Maplewood; provided Y P P , however, that the Revenue Bonds issued for the ur p pose of discharging (i) the City of Maplewood Hosp ital Revenue Bonds (Health Resources Hospital Corporation), Series 1983 and (ii the City of Maplewood Tender Option Hospital Refunding Bond , Series 1985 (Health Resources Hospital Corporation) shall be 13 deemed issued on behalf of the Cit of Maplewood, under the provisions of the Act and Minnesota Statutes section 471,59, 3. Source and Contribution of Funds* Allocat I ion of Funds. The source of funds to finance the Project-shall be the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds, certain mone held in debt service reserve funds or similar funds created in connection with the bonds to be refunded b the Revenue Bonds, and, if necessar a contribution to be made b the Borrower. These funds shall be deposited and applied as provided in that certain Indenture of Trust and Pled (the "Indenture") b and between the HRA and Mar Bank Minn eapolis, N-AO, Minneap- Olis, Minnesota, as trustee, dated as of Au - 1, 1987o 4. Nature of Revenue Bonds. The 'Revenue Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of the HRA pa solel from proceeds, revenues and other amounts pled thereto and more full described in the Indenture. The RpvPniip nnnAi= =nA interest thereon shall neither constitute nor give rise to a pecuniar liabilit general or moral obli or a pled of the full faith or loan of credit of the HRA, the Cit of Saint Paul or the City of Maplewood, within the meanin of an Constitutional or statutor provisions, 5. Term of Agreement Termination. Unless otherwise provided b concurrent action of the HRA and the Cit of Maplewood, this Agreement shall terminate upon the retirement 14 or def easance of the last o Revenue Bond, and this Agreement ma not be terminated in-advance of such retirement or.- defeasance, 6 Amendments. This Agreement ma be amended, b the HRA and the Cit of Maplewood 'at an time, No amendmen"E. ma impair the rights of the holders of the Revenue Bonds, unless the have consented to such amendment in the manner provided for an amendment of the Indenture. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housin and Redevelopment Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul, Minnesota, has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf b its Chairman, Secretar Executive Director and Director of Finance and Mana Services and the seal of the HRA to be hereunto affixed and dul attested; the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf b its Ma and the seal of the Cit of Maplewood to be hereunto affixed and dul attested b its Cit Clerk; all as of the da and y ear first above written. 15 THE F10USTNG AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA (SEAL) B Its Chairman B Its Secretar B Its Executive Director B Its Director of Finance and Mana Services Approved as to Form: Assistant Cit Attorne Consent A for the Issuance of Revenue Bonds for .HealthEast, 'Inc. dated as of Au 1 1987 b and between The Housin and Redevelopment •Authorit of the Cit of Saint Paul, Minnesota and the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, 16 (SEAL) THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA By Its Mayor Attested: By Its City Clerk Consent Agreement for the Issuance of Revenue Bonds for HealthEast, Inc. dated as of August 1, 1987 by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. 17 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY APPROVAL OF TAX - EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE FINANCING . Whereas, the following requirements for approval of tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing b the City P y y of Maplewood, Minnesota have been establ in order to protect the public health safety* �an d welfare,, and to ensure the civic and financial well being f the city and ' g y its.. residents. Whereas, the following requirements for approval revenue financing PP al of tax- exempt mortgage nancing by the City of Maplewood, i n .the interest of Minnesota. has. been established by great amounts of effort and research it n ch citizens, and Whereas, if any segment or portion of these requirements q rements are rendered void by subsequent action taken by governing bodies of superior status or the courts, the remainder of these conditions will not be . e voided or NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following g requirements are adopted for city y pproval of tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The following re u i rements m • q must be met for city approval of all tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing: 1. The project shall be consistent with the ' • city s comprehensive plan, zoning, community design review board standards and all Ap provals other applicable ordinances. A PP for a plan amendment, rezoning, conditional use permit, var i - ance - or �s i to and building obtained concur rent 1 - _ �design must be -- . --�� ; -,-- :V-..__.— _ .. ,. __.._._ y w Y t o r p r i o r_ .. ..o. _. Pre i m i n a r y a p p r o_v a o r tax = 1 financing. _ _ exempt _..a x.,...,. ... _ n.9 •.e cons . Hearing notices s h a 11 b e sent ` --- ..��._ _ - _- -__ -__ -- - -- ._ -_ ... _ ...�._� t �`ee� of the �° a Property owners wit - Kin 350 construction site at least ten days before the hearing. Baring. 2. The project shall not require a significant • q g i f i cant amount of public s expenditures for city y improvements, such as roads, sewers and water mains if the city council determines � that the site area is premature for development. 3. The notes or bonds shall be for an ' $•300,000. Issue of not less than 4. Construction must begin within one • grant .year of preliminary approval. The city council may g nt a time extension i f just ca use is shown 5. Contractors loin work • 9 on projects funded in whole or in art b tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing: P �' a. Shall not discriminate in the Kirin o ' on .the bas i s of race col 0 9 r firing of employees • r, creed, religion, national origin, sex marital status, status with regard to ubl' age. P is assistance, disability or 18 Attachment 3 ■ w b• Shall compensate employees with • wages and financial remuneration as provided under the United States Code ' h June 23 . Sect on 276A, as amended through , 1986 , and under Minnesota Statutes 1985 Sections 177.41 - 177.44. c. Shall be required to employ Minnesota residents 80% of the j obs created b the ro • in at least Y P sect; and, at .least 60$ of the grow residents of the metropolitan area P shall be r seven- county metro .status under both of the above P � Resident � categories shall be determined as of the date of the project's approval by the city council . the contractor can show tha r However, if t these quotas are not Feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel, in specific ' may request the city P skills, the contractor • y counci 1 for a release f rom the two res idenc y requirements. The requirements shall continue Y. construction project, for the duration of the d. Shall " be active participants in a State e of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of P Labor and I ndustry , e. All provisions of this tax-exempt finance requirements equlrements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the project. 6. The applicant shall use a bond counsel designated by the city. COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENTS The following additional requirements • projects: q shall apply to commercial J 1. Definitions: a. "Commercial project" is defined as an existing Y xi,sting business or new business venture involving the manufacture, distribution, sale, storage or rendering of any merchandise real ! estate, produce, food, housing or services which will produce income for one or more individuals. "Existing business" is def i ned as an operating ' ter rise w' P rating industry or commercial en • P with at least one year of operational history within the city. Y c. "New business" is defined as an industrial • enterprise which does Y trial or commercial not qualify as an existing business. 2. Requirements: a. The project shall involve an e • existing business that the city wishes to expand or a new business which ch the city wishes to attract. (1) Existing business criteria: An expansion, xpansion, relocation or rehabilitation of an existing business may be considered for approval. 19 (2) New business criteria: A new business may only b considered for approval if it: y y e (a) Offers at least 400 hours per week of new, employment opportunities on a year -round basis or (b) Involves the rehabilitation of a vacan o scheduled to be vacated structure, or (c) Is within a designa development or red target area P evelop- ment tar 9 , and (d) Possesses a low potential for creatin pollution. b. A written opinion, with supporting justification, ert acc , p g from a qualified expert acceptable to the city shall be submitted with the application to document that the ro ose ' � P p d business will not adversely affect similar, existing businesses. This requirement ma be waived if there are no similar businesses that would be affected, c. The project must exceed minimum code requirements incorporating at least five of t q eats by he following features into the project: Brick - Building design should be a distinct nongeneric style with meaningful details A noticeable increase in the size and ua plantings . over what q ntity of landscape is normally required Underground irrigation of all landscaping Open space, other than required setbacks At least 10% more parkin than cod ' 9 e requires Walkway along street frontages All parking stall widths at least ten feet t All signs shall be at least 20% small • smaller or fewer in number than allowed by code 20 Firm plans expansion at other area hospitals By Walter Parker Staff writer St. John's Eastside Hospital, a fixture for 76 years on the bluff overlooking downtown St. Paul from the east, will close by Dec. 1, hospital officials announced Thursday. The hospital at 403 Maria Ave. becomes the second on St. Paul's fast Side to be closed in a month by ■ Neighborhood reacts to loss of hospital. Page 4A HealthEast, a company that operates six hospitals in St. Paul. Mounds Park Hospital, 200 Earl St., will close sometime this summer. The announcement did not come as a surprise. Com- pany officials, in fact, had hinted that the HealthEast board was even pondering closing two hospitals in an effort to shore up sagging occupancy levels. That didn't happen, however, though some observers said Thursday they believe more consolidation could occur in the system within two years. In addition to announcing the closing of St. John's Eastside, company officials unveiled plans for spend- ing an additional $25 million over the next two or three years to expand or upgrade some of its other hospitals. 'They also plan to buy expensive new medi- cal equipment, including new devices for heart catheterization and radiation therapy for cancer 21 Attachment 4 aA F /FRCM THE ONT PAGE St. Paul Pioneer Press Dispatch Frida Jul 10, 1987 HUsp�l/ CI i os g n after 76 years on city s East Side ' Continued from Page 1A treatment. HealthEast was formed last fall by a group of four community hospitals and now includes St_ Joseph's, St. John's Northeast, Midway and Bethesda Lutheran hos- pitals in St. Paul. About 30 percent of the company revenues come from non - hospital operations such as nursing homes, home health and ambulance services and outpatient surgery centers. Officials also said Thursday they are close to an agreement to take over management of yet another hospital, Divine Redeemer Memorial of South St. Paul. Like most Twin Cities community hospitals, Di- vine Redeemer's occupancy levels have been anemic in recent years, averaging 24 percent of licensed ca- pacity in 1986, according to a new report by the Met- ropolitan Health Planning Board. HealthEast co-presidents John Reiling and Nick Huger expressed a commitment to Divine Redeemer, N however, which they said is located in a strategically N important growth sector and has strong support from primary care doctors in the area. HealthEast hopes to sign an agreement within 60 days to manage Divine Redeemer on a sublease from its current operator, American Healthcare Management, Inc_, of Dallas. Divine Redeemer is owned by the Sisters of the Di- vine Redeemer. HealthEast's formation last year in St. Paul sig- naled the start of a series of dramatic moves to shrink hospital capacity in a market health planners say had roughly twice as many beds as it needs. Competitive pressures, coupled with insurers' growing resistance to paying for costly hospital care, have forced hospi- tals to search for ways to reduce overhead and dupli- cation. The closure of Mounds Park and St. John's Eastside leaves St. Paul's vast East Side without its "own" hos- pital. although St. Paul- Ramsey Medical Center, St. Joseph's and Bethesda hospitals are within a mile of St. John's. Still, the closure Will prove inconvenient for resi- dents, especially those who don't have cars. Last year, for example, there were 12,040 walk -in emergency room visits to St. John's Eastside. And St,. Paul Fire Department paramedics sometimes bring critically ill By Walter Parker Staff Writer The other shoe finally dropped Thursday for many East Siders who had feared St. John's East - side, the mustard - colored hospi- tal on the bluff with the million - dollar view of downtown St. Paul, was on the critical list. "It goes back to when they were planning to build St. John's Northeast in Maplewood. We knew then that if service levels did not stay up they'd eventually have to close," said Ron Wagner, community organizer for the Dayton's Bluff neighborhood. "In many ways it's like losing an old friend," Wagner said. "They've been in the neighbor- hood a long time. Even when you know something like this is com- ing it doesn't make it a lot easi- er." Mark Miesen, a roofing con- tractor and president of the Payne - Arcade Area Business As- sociation, called the closing of the 76- year -old hospital "another • p assi ng blow to the East Side. Its not good news." He and other East Siders ex- pressed more concern about the long -term economic impact of closing the hospital than on ac- cess to emergency medical care. St. Paul- Ramsey Medical Center, he noted, "is just a hop on the freeway and you're there in two minutes." St. John's EasWde Hospital employs about 830 people, many of whom are part- tuners, and many of whom live in the neigh- borhood. Layoffs resulting from closing the hospital will be shared with the other five hospi- tals of HealthEast, but the loss of traffic generated by the hospital will hurt surrounding businesses, Miesen said. But he said activity at the hos- pital, which employs only about half as many people as it did five years ago, has slowed considera- bly anyway. He said HealthEast officials have maintained close contact with neighborhood groups and patients there simply because it's closest. Layoffs will result from the St. John's move, but Reiling and Hilger said they won't have a firm idea of how many for several weeks. The company, which also operates ambulance services, nursing homes and home healthcare programs, employs 5,000 people. Ef- forts are being made to reduce the job -loss impact with early retirement offers, selective hiring freezes and the planned use of attrition. St. John's Eastside, a 120 -bed hospital that employs 830 persons, many of them part -time, Won't bear the mourned have made it clear they have a commitment to the area. "It's not the kind of thing where they're going to sell to the highest bidder and wash their hands of the whole affair," he said. Company executives are scheduled to hold an open meet- ing with area residents at 7 p.m. Monday in St. John's School, 951 E. Fifth St. Hospital workers, meanwhile, have many questions about their futures, said Cindy Olson, a criti- cal -care nurse and representa- tive of the Minnesota Nurses As- sociation. Former Mounds Park Hospital nurses, who moved to St. John's when their hospital became a mental health and chemical de- pendency treatment center last year, are particularly worried, Olson said. They lost seniority with the previous move. Mounds Park nurses were not unionized, unlike their counterparts at St. John's. full brunt of its own closing, however. Company offi- cials said layoffs will be spread over all their hospi- tals on the basis of a single seniority list, or as labor contracts allow. "We can't give you a specific number right now," said Hilger. "We're not dodging it but we just don't know." Some hospitals, for example, will need to add work- ers to handle additional patients who would have gone to Eastside. And other hospitals, such as St. Joseph's, will be expanding their activities in heart surgery and catheterization and radiation therapy for cancer pa- tients. St. Joseph's has done a relatively low volume of cardiac care and open heart surgery in the past. The vast majority of cardiac care in the eastern metropol- itan area has been done at United Hospital, which will now face increased competition in the lucrative cardi- ac area from hospitals from which it once received referral patients. Hilger stressed that doctors, not hospitals, make re- ferrals. The same heart specialists who work at Unit- ed also work at St. Joseph's, meaning the key question will be where the specialists choose to work. Metro- politan Health Planning Board volume guidelines sug- gest hospital's should do at least 125, preferably 200, open heart surgeries and 150 to 200 heart catheteriza- tion a year to maintain maximum quality standards. Among the other changes announced are plans to: ■ Establish a "regional geriatrics center" at Bethes- da Lutheran Medical Center. ■ Purchase a linear accelerator to expand and up- grade the mega - voltage radiation therapy unit for cancer treatment at St. Joseph's, which is already the metro area's largest radiation therapy center. wwww ■ Expand the two-year -old St. John's Northeast in Maplewood in the areas of obstetrics, emergency and gastrointestinal services and kidney dialysis. e Blend the hospitals' physicians' staffs, so doctors with admitting privileges at one HealthEast hospital have them at all the company's hospitals. Officials said primary care doctors on HealthEast advisory task forces placed a premium on that feature, which will enable them to have greater ability to monitor patients they refer to other doctors. Hilger said no plans have been made yet to use the St. John's and Mounds Park buildings. Company offi- cials have been consulting with neighborhood groups and said they would prefer to see at least one of them used for social service purposes- H os��tal's MEMORANDUM TO: Cit Mana FROM* Associate Planner--Johnson SUBJECT: Preliminar Plat, Rezonin (F to Public Improvement Project LOCATION: Desoto Street, South of Roselawn APPLICANT/OWNER: Leo Markfort 0 PROJECT. Markfort Addition DATE: Au 3, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction Action b Council!- Endorsed Modif , Re Date k i ti) and Avenue 1. The applicant has re preliminar plat approval for 24 sin lots. He is proposin to develop the site in two phases. (Refer to pa 12 .) Phase Two would not be final-platted until the construction of an area storm water project is guaranteed, 2. Cit staff is proposin the rezonin from F, farm residence to R- 1, sin dwellin to avoid an potential nuisances that could -arise from farm uses, such as the raisin of livestock, in a residential nei 3. Cit Staff is also recommendin that council initiate a public improvement project to ac ri for Riple Avenue, west of this plat, Discussion This proposal is consistent with the street plan concept prepared b staff on pa 10 and the cit subdivision and zonin codes. The development of the site must be phased, as proposed, due to lack of an ade draina outlet for this area. The main issue to be resolved is whether Riple Avenue should be a throu street. A public improvement project is needed to ac the right-of-wa to extend Riple Avenue west of this plat to McMenem Street. If the cit does not ac this right-of-wa the owner of 1774 McMenem i intends to build on the north side of his lot. The cit approved a lot division in 1978 that has not been recorded. This would prevent the street from g oin g throu and Riple Avenue would have to be a cul-de-sac. Staff's reasons for preferrin throu streets to cul-de- sacs are listed on pa 4. Recommendation I. Approve the Markfort Addition preliminar plat (plans date- stamped 7-2-87) subject to satisfaction of the followin conditions before final plat approval: A. Final-plattin shall be limited to Phase I until a construction contract is si for a storm water project to drain this area to Round Lake. Phase II must be platted as an outlot u ntil this contract is si B. The Riple Avenue right-of-wa shall be moved five feet south, at its intersection with Desoto Street. The len of the west propert line for each corner lot need not be altered. CIO A draina easement shall be shown on the outlot or ,buildable lots for Phase II for an portion of the planned two- acre-foot pond that will encroach upon this site, The location of this pond must be approved b the cit en All future lots that will adjoin this easement shall have at least 10,000 s feet of area above the easement, Do A twenty-foot-wide draina easement . shall be shown on Phase II from the south propert line to the north propert line, endin at the future two-acre-foot pond in easement. This storm sewer shall be constructed b the developer as owner of the o utlot when the outlot is platted into buildable lots. The cit en shall approve the location of the easement to insure that it is properl located to drain the propert to the south and this site to the future pond* E A recordable quit-claim deed shall be submitted to the cit en for a 100-foot-diameter temporar cul-de-sac bulb for the west end of Riple Avenue. F.a Before final plat approval for Phase II, the owner of the multiple dwellin propert to th.e north must be g iven the opportunit to document his preference to route sanitar sewer for his propert throu the applicant's site, rather than to McMenem Street. This documentation shall include the depth of the proposed multiple dwellin service connections and the depth of the sanitar sewers that will be available to,the propert If this information cannot be provided before final- plattin of Phase I is re a twenty-foot-wide utilit easement shall be shown on the outlot between future Riple Avenue and the north line of the outlot. The cit en must approve the location. The elevation of the sewer in Phase I shall accommodate this re sewer. The owner of the outlot shall deed to the cit a five-foot-wide temporar construction easement alon each side of the permanent easement, if the outlot will be platted before this sanitar sewer will be constructed, The propert owner shall pa for this sanitar sewer if the cit en determines there is a public need to route it throu the applicant's site. If there i's no public need, then the easement shall be vacated unless the propert owner to the north guarantees its construction and the owner of the outlot and the cit en a to the routin G. The cit en shall approve final g radin g , utilit draina and erosion control plans. A construction . easement (s 2 shall be obtained for an off -site. g radin g . The draina plan shall include a temporar pond if Phase I is developed before the area storm water project is under contract. This temporar pond must limit storm water dischar from the site to current levels, H. A si developer's a shall be submitted to the c it y en with the re suret for all re on-site public improvements, includin 1. A storm water pond 2. Storm sewer 3. Street and utilities I. If council does not initiate a public improvement project to ac right-of-wa for Riple Avenue, west of the plat, Phase .II must be redesi as a permanent cul-de-sac, Ho Approve the resolution on pa 13 to rezone this propert from F, farm to R-1, sin dwelling, CITIZEN COMMENTS Twenty -eight persons who own property within 350 feet of this si to were asked their opinion of this proposal. Of the thirteen respondents, eight are in favor, three have no comment and two are opposed. Although in favor, four of the respondents raised the following concerns: 10 "I am in favor of the proposed 24 lots, but I am opposed to running a road between my house and my mother's house to the west of this site (1774 and 1780 McMenemy Street) ." Staff comment: The alternative to a through- street is a cul -de -sac of approximately PP y 885 feet. The advantages of a cul -de -sac are that there would be no through traffic and the garage at 1780 McMenemy Street would not have to be removed. The disadvantages are: a. Less efficient traffic circulation for the neighborhood. This would be the only street connecting McMenemy and Desoto Streets, between Roselawn and Larpenteur Avenues. (See area street plan on page 10 . ) b. More city time for snow removal. C41 Police patrols tend to avoid cul -de -sacs. In general, cul -de -sacs are an advantage for the people who live on them, but a disadvantage to the rest of the neighborhood and the city. As a result, city code requires cul -de -sacs to be as short as possible. City staff generally recommends a through street whenever r practical. The connection to McMenemy Street would not be built until one or both of the adjacent land owners is ready to develop, "Cheap, small homes may be built with the intention of building ilding a Hmong community next to the proposed church. Staff comment: Each of these lots exceeds the city's minimum lot dimension requirements. The applicant estimates that the homes should sell for at least $85,000 to $95,000. THe city does not regulate who buys them. 3. "Is it possible to serve the multiple dwelling property to g P P y the north with sanitary sewer through the applicant's site? M site will be difficult to develop f it must be Y P served -from McMenemy Street." 4 Staf f comment: A condition of approval will be to provide an easement if the cit engineer concurs with the person's concerns, 4 . "What will the exact location of the pond be that is proposed to be north of the applicant's site?" Staff comment: A condition of approval will be the completion of an area storm water feasibilit stud This stud will recommend the most practical location for the pond. No decision has been made as to whose propert it will be located on, 5. "Will the pond be fenced? How deep will it be, and will the g rade of the land be chan for this pond?" Staff comment: The pond will not be fenced. It is the cit po licy to construct ponds with g entle side slopes. The depth of a pond depends on the area that it will cover--the smaller the area, the deeper the pond. This pond, however, is desi to store water primaril after stron rain storms and durin rapid snow melt. The natural depression in this area has been partiall filled,, It is possible that some of this fill will be excavated and other parts of the depression filled. The idea is to locate it in an area that will be the most beneficial to the future development of this area, I The two persons who object to the proposal raised the followin concerns: 1* "The increased traffic on Desoto Street in li of its current condition." Staff comment: The cit en reco that Desoto Street is in need of bein upgraded. However he states that the traffic from this development, particularl in li of the recommendation to phase the development, will not significantl affect the street. There are no plans to up the road, other than its intersection with Larpenteur Avenue, which should occur shortl 2* "Will there be a need to up roads or sewer?" Staff comment: This plat will not re the upgradin • of area street or sanitar sewer• (See the previous comment* An area storm water project is needed to complete development of this area, as planned in the cit comprehensive plan, 3. "Will this addition affect our taxes?" Staff comment: Burt Reinich an appraiser for Ramse Count stated that there is ver little chance that the taxes for adjoinin properties would be increased. Taxes would onl increase if the value of homes increases. An adjustment would not be considered for at least four to five y ears. However, this development is conditioned upon the., development of an area storm water project. If this project is ordered, propert owners in a 2.5-square-mile area from McMenem to Arcade Streets, between Skillman and Larpenteur Avenues, ma be assessed, 40.. "What P ublic schools would kids attend?" Staff comment: This site is located within the Roseville school district. Children in this area will attend Edgerton Elementar School (Edgerton Street and Roselawn Avenue), Kello Middle School and Ramse Hi School, REFERENCE Site Descri Gross area: 7.42 acres Existin land use: undeveloped Surroundin Land Uses North: An undeveloped single-dwellin lot and a partiall developed propert that is planned and zoned for multiple dwellin use, East: Desoto Street* Across the street are sin dwellin and a corridor proposed for the future construction of an east/west street, (See pa 9 o South: A sin dwellin (1801 Desoto Street) and the site of a proposed Hmon church. West** Two single-dwellin properties which can be subdivided • into six single-dwellin lots* (See the area street plan concept on pa 1.0. Past Action Propert adjoinin to the south: 11-24-86: Council approved a conditional use permit for the construction of a church for a Hmong.congre A condition of approval was to provide on-site storm water pondin if construction had not be on an area storm water project. The attorne for the church states that the intend to appl for a buildin permit in the near future. He also stated that once the congre becomes established, the ma want to expand the church and/or parkin area to the east of the approved church location. �01 Plannin 1* Land use plan desi RL residential low densit 2. Zonin F, farm residence 39 Densit Plannin people/net acre Proposed--16.6 people/net acre ( 5..93 net acres) There is no re in the subdivision or zonin codes for sin plats to compl with the densit maximums in the land use plan, 4. Compliance with cit code: a. This plat meets or exceeds all lot dimension re b. Section 30-8 (b (3 states that "cul-de-sacs, when used, shall be held to as short a dista as possible 0 0 CIO Section 36-485 re four findin for the approval of a rezonin Refer to the resolution on pa 13, do The intersection of proposed Riple Avenue should be moved five feet south. This adjustment is needed to provide at least 100 feet of width for . future corner lot on the Tor propert to the east of Desoto Street (pa 1.0 ) 0 Public Works On March 25, 1985, council ordered a feasibilit stud to construct a si portion of the downstream storm water pond and accompan storm sewer s The applicant has submitted a petition to expand this stud to include his propert jW Attachments lo Location Map 2. Propert Line/Zonin Map 3. Area Street Plan Concept 4. Draina Plan -5. Preliminar Plat (8 1/2 x 11 6. Resolution 7. Preliminar Plat (separate 7 t � C/TY OF a • w.rn� C OUN , OF L /TTLE' Catie nA r Olt M t L� C/ rY OF R- 2 ST. PAUL LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 n V R � F e R -4 . ML t Q- N 13 vy 4 17 r 14 17 14 MJA t0l!==j" 15 > j(kn---1 L la lali—Jo _L3�..7�} 2 . �� .... 76 7'1 7•, - �� ■�..a ■� ■ ■� ■ ■ 0m, ■ I No wn,an E**P—L AWN' 1 AV E. T 7 7 5 U40. t 2 7 Is 3. jr, 7A 7 .j r C 0 4. < 4.1 1 atc) 21. z (7 U) r--e- 10 Ggnc. 6 631) 49 JR 10 1 Ci v I .54 CHURCH OF 'T JEROME 77 0 In I fl* )lf"r ip tM. 1 1 rio 46 ja ID I o to M co v Wtf 0 77 ;R COBS-. 4 I SO) 7 gr pl 03AC, 73 ;4 C64 (3.4! tv X (54) 0 15 Q n WOW' o-51 d I.t4ac ZS4 The rn to .• � ► � � (02 _ __ L.? - T mac. R 3 Proposed pond 1 Z j i 1 U� � 4q !Rx LA Z %* • T -mX Xov^ Ira's .37nc IS ......... . ......... ...• ....... (4 . 1780 ......... i 11 41 4 4 .0.6. • - • ................ .............. ... ------ T i; 9 1 V % 1774 ...... V.-NOW" ev% r... • !X 1, .4 -wi vx% � � ; % x M . • • tty N W. X K .: ' .... ...... F . .. ....... X ho • - - — — F - 1801 L7 ] a rl A cc 30 Proposed Hmon church I 'D Fr 4 (0 1 It _ 11.1 1 .1 L l t 7 j r A.- Fca .27 v 4 7 — A 25 t 24 (v) Gil— 140 �.' 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 44 jv 4 L J (0 vac. I I S _V3 N ry 13 Is 7ar- I 14 -7 � 0' - — .._�._� _ ..`�� .[( I,li�, .f_ .._- N � w� 1.3 r1� N 1 04 r P � __. ._ t;11.�1) O � li T 5 zAj -157 we T S 414 r 141 al to 4L. % 5 Io 14o ) w -MAE" 5 to lb -- 7 1 tv. JIM 9w, S61 - Rim wl�tww 1 16 F' '?.I r6c � ( O _ �� 1 C 0 14.1 tA 1 Q �- 10 12 ac. iZ) \ r06 3 0 < 4t. 4 > 3 0 KINGS TON 06 0 Cole AVE A z M60 bi 4 c_ 7 7 A— O t t 'Z 1w PROPERTY LINE /ZONING Z MAP Attachment 2 �, ' � } ,_ - - -- - - - - T ta -fit- M 'W Zj or 64) 0 � � �� LtS' +►....�_ - - ..../tw ..rte. -"--'Y __, ('v rr _ 17 -'. •_- -..-- : .r..- , •. .� , (` fi I { I ��. 1 7►c� 4.'11 aloe l J r h :✓ � ,• °�3 I x 1�: -�bg ac '�.,) i zg '� „ == '"" : 12 u W . ; PROPOSED FOR SCHOOL ANDS _T- , -- _ ..54 .�. ❑t,�, I "PARKING LOT EXPANSION Ij+ 'w' " rij _ 1..-� ► OD 1► •� r* n s, ct _ V 1 ID _-LAG f , ., . �,{/� • 1 + ,r,f 1 � I J � 1 It' � ,� h.r.v CL) y 3 � c 4 7 �s S7 Q'h' ;D r .. _..' t r ; ' '• r ? 1 l 1 ( (49) �5p) O •� -4 j [� 1 - c i .' 4 S 7 of 0 o 1 8 (7 ❑ 13 r 1 ' , ►f, v �` x 'I . �03aC• ' rJ y '' �` 0 3C,I�y `) 644 7tt 3 l .e>tas I �oz� �Z) J � i ,� �d .� ,, (53) i h9 ,� ( - •-- «L .l___1 9 , (14) 2 „.► U g 1 { `5 .sob a. _ tom) �+ �'" v 6 � 3 2 1 'tt)�1' 1 ) of ► 4 m ^ / e•so Too 7s 7l I 1 z•±... dw tn — U. act 'R �) j' ► t. --- Loo ' POND �.z,ro,�, �J) 'r -e • '' . �.': ► -� TORGERSON PROPERTY . 1780 .. 1- • I ;� �- - - y• ' 1 J 10 1 144 , � _ ;�.. 3 RI PLEY AVENUE <Z1 .� • , -�� ''. � omwo�,.l 0 got �0 1 - 1`7 1'. 7 KC ,� I ' S �'� �s I •�.7�1 �n �'.1�9t � Z � j L: w 1 i , (r C) i . 4 r ' ( PROPOSED HMONG CHURCH SITE �` ' - ' - ;�,� 1 841 1 ,o • ,�� L 3 ax_ Q^?a,, 04 POSSIBLE 30± FOOT �' a L . _.� l Rc�)' CHURCH EXPANSION III ; �w : , ,. , I > qn J 1 4<`�a �� ►• r m 1-- ( 9 (t4� -11'11 1 ..L a 7 1 1 7. ' T R, \r0 + ' �;/ X 1 24 , CL � � • s ' • ` • • 4Q I jr �r . i �"' �, 00\ ,1 et 1 �{•t e .17 POND. In. 1! I J + � 1, 1 S 1 ; ma y ~ $n ' ►I�t) c r �t� Ic �� ' s , 5'. r t �' , ` r ` . -- • i "`rte _ i `�, f►1 o q o f ,w I N G S T— .�_ I o ` a O a ° � {` lla,►,7z p ` �' izzo fu S c�) ^ 1 " t C 41 TQht �� 15ee °_ h , - row .,, („)1� �► SS j' t o '^ .' (�e) .� (at `;e r .59�� 1 It► a ° x ►1� r 0 x 8 � ��)'� ----- ' It - to � +r. �] � 10 i. r o 7.88 � ► � � � g r � S �6 1 V-4. 'y I JB/► , s c _ ec ' 33 90 as . 1 tL c ��o 0� ro (r� o+ n 3 r h �Q P. ,,. G ,� •i o aj N •, 0 / • t ' 1 �) ' Y X1141 ► +' ,,� 9 �' �.. ' ff .• p M,, -� 7 \` �✓ Bl t ` I I �S A !t 1 j ° Cis) '� � 4 fi 6 " , k cc 1 o n 173s lo I o� = - s ► L .A R PENT -- .. AREA STREET PLAN CONCEPT 10 Attachment 3 MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42" EXISTING STORM SEWER OPEN CHANNEL STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME 4,4F DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS A* r EXCERPT FROM THE DRAINAGE PLAN 11 Attachment 4 s i 246 M ICY N PHASE I I PHASE I 77.�V 77t! s71 77,• 77 a font a GARAGE THAT MUST 7R I p 0 / 7><f 771 7M 1 h' 78 12 11 10 9 8 BE RELOCATED ,s 5 4 3 2 I � J4 7 // f� J� a st.a J —.. i.. .�. .: Riflla nRt /tf6,1 /Rifler Il,srlai t1 1..�r naww /IRtfl,.r N,tlfli N.t to ARtfrfv //,7�s.1 043Ar R uJ lit •� n H .N.v�►.v 7lrjwnnw�N f� ffr�altf a.w �„' .r... _ ! C A ^ ;� __.. _ --� $ . RIPLEY =:-- _ -_ - = RIPLEY AVENUE - - - -. N �-- ` 2 7z. > �. a, ..._�z, A— •� , p— -�- — ._____� S � �i.• L �_..._ ._:•.Z anw+ row rrw.eMn � 3 W .. � r ni """r MAW t f�• �„rl,�, a — ...�.. � � _ filth. /lfr•N y I, 1 a a I mo► I w r 12 11 10 a a r �.a.! /i : �... / R: �o /v �t t]v ,f., /o sss ,� /e : a.... /yt: ai ,�,� /w i s. i 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ' I !' �• 2 S aM N /y it w r alv fJt w N fs M! f R� ff w Ali 1 i _ s ♦s•r. •.r fv I . ! RIPLEY AVENUE Sa So' � PROPOSED PARKING AREA L i PROPOS ED 1 ` CHURCH I ` PROPOSED HMON CHURCH 1 I G SITE I --- -- -.�.:� 7 MARKFORT ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 1? Attachment 5 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a re meetin of the Cit Co'uncil of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota was dul called and held in the council chambers in said cit on the da of r 1987 at 7 p.m. The followin members were present: The followin members were absent: WHEREAS, the Cit of Maplewood initiated a rezonin from F, farm residence to R-1, sin dwellin for the followin propert The East 3/4 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 17, Township 29, Ran 22, subject to the ri of the public in hi accordin to the government surve thereof. WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this rezonin is as follows: 1. This rezonin was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances* 2. This rezonin was reviewed b the Maplewood Plannin Commission on Jul 20, 1987. The plannin commission recommended to the cit council that said rezonin be approved. 3. The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearin on 1987 to consider this rezonin Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearin were g iven 'an opportunit to be heard and present written 'statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the cit staff and plannin commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezonin be approved on the basis of the followin findin of fact: 1. The proposed chan is consistent with ' spirit, purpose and intent of the zonin code, 2. The proposed chan will not substantiall in-jure or detract from the use of nei propert or from the character of the nei and that the use of the propert adjacent to the area included in the proposed chan or plan is ade safe 3. The proposed chan will serve the best interests and conveniences of the communit where applicable and the public welfare, 13 Attachment 6 40. The proposed chan would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire'..protection and schools, 5 The proposed chan would avoid an potentiall nuisances, that could ould arise from farm uses,' such as the raisin of livestock, in a residential neighborhood. Adopted this da of 1987* Seconded b A - STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SS. CITY. OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersi bein the dul qualified and appointed of the Cit of clerk Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereb certif that I have carefull compared the attached and fore extract of minutes of a re meetin of the Cit of Maplewood held on the da of ,.1987 with the ori on file in my office, and the same is a full,, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezonin Witness m hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the cit this da of , 19879 City Clerk City of Maplewood, 14 page 2 VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Preliminary Plat and Rezoning: Markfort Addition Greg Brick of Probe Engineering Company, was present representing the applicant. He said he has had extensive meetings with staff and did understand the conditions stated in the staff report would like P He said they i ke to go ahead with phase I ,th i s year. He a l s o stated that he was in agreement with the conditions.of the staff report. Commissioner Fischer moved: 1. Approval of the Markfort Addition preliminary plat, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions before final plat approval: a. Final- platting shall be limited to phase I until a construction contract(s) is signed for a storm water project to drain this area to Round Lake. Phase II must be platted as an outlot until this contract is signed. b. The Ripley Avenue right -of -way shall be moved five south at it ve feet s intersection with Desoto Street. The length of the . west property l i n e for each corner lot need not be altered, C. A drainage easement shall be shown on the outlot r b u i l d a b l e lots for phase I I for o P any portion of the planned two - acre -foot pond that will encroach upon this site. The location of this pond must be approved b the city y engineer ft All future 1 ots tha . t w i l l adjoin this easement shall have at least 10,000 square feet of area above the easement d. A twenty --foot -wide drainage easement shall be shown on phase II from the south property line to the north the f - property l i ne, ending future two-acre-foot pondi ng easement. This storm sewer shall be constructed b the developer eloper as owner of the outlot when the outlot is platted into buildable b e lots. The city engineer shall approve the location of the easement to insure that it is properly located to drain the property to the south and this site to the future P ond. e. A recordable quit -claim deed shall be submitted to h t e city engineer for a 100 - foot - diameter temporary u 1 -de --sac Ripley Avenue bulb for the west end of y . f. Before final plat approval for phase 11, the own le dwelling owner of the multi P g property to the north must be givenothe opportunity to document his preference to route sanitary sew h er for his property through the applicant's site, rather than to McMe nemy Street. This documentation shall include the depth pth of the proposed multiple dwelling service connections and the depth of the sanitary sewers that will be available ble to the property. 720 -87 page 3 If t h i s information cannot be provided before f i nAl— platting of phase I is requested, a twenty — foot —wide utility easement shall be shown on the outlot between future Ripley Avenue and the north l i n e of the outlot, The city engineer must approve the location, The elevation of the sewer in phase I shall accommodate: 'this' requested sewer. The owner of the outlot shall deed to the city a five — foot —wide temporary construction easement along each side of the permanent easement, if the outlot will be platted before this sanitary sewer will be constructed. The property owner shall pay for this sanitary sewer if the city engineer determines there is a public need to route it through the applicant's site. If there is no public need, then the easement shall be vacated unless the property owner to the north guarantees its construction and the owner of the outlot and the city engineer agree to the routing. g. The city engineer shall approve final grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. A construction easements) shall be obtained for any off —site grading. The drainage plan shall i ncl ude a temporary pond if phase I is developed before the area storm water project is under contract. This temporary pond must limit storm water discharge from the site to current levels. h. A signed developer's agreement shall be submitted to the city engineer, with the requ surety, for all requ i red on —site public improvements, including: 1. A storm water pond 2. Storm sewer 3. Street and u t i l i t i e s 2. Approve the resolution to rezone this property from F, farm to. R -1, single dwelling. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fi of a, Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Sletten, Sigmundik B. Preliminary Pyat: Cave's Junek Park Mr. Junek, owner of he projec property, was present representing Sam Cave. He stated r. Cave aid the conditions of the staff report were acceptable to him. Commissioner Fischer mov pproval of Cave's Junek Addition preliminary plat, subject to the fol 1 i ng conditions being met before final plat approval: I .1. The plat shall be r�vised�as illustrated on map. The required changes include: / a. Mary Court s all interse t with Idaho Avenue at a right angle, with Ida Avenue bei n the through — street. The c i t y shall approve t e radius of th's curve. This alignment shall allow for a ro of lots south o the extended street, with each lot having at east 10,000 squar feet of area above the easement for the requ i ed two — acre —foot po d. (Refer to Condition Four.) 7-- -20 -87 TO: FROM: SUBJECT* LOCATION* APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Introduction Johnson Sterlin Street Inc. SUMMARY Action b Councilp Endorsed, Modif ieA- Rejected Date The applicant - icant is requestin preliminar plat approval • for 21 sin dwellin lots. (Refer to the map on pa 14 The record g of this plat would also create a five-acre remnant parcel to-be developed at a later date (pa 10 0 . p Back On Jul 13, 1986: Council approved the Cave's Sterlin Addition preliminar plate (Refer to the map on pa llo) The easterl y portion of the present proposal includes the part of the Sterlin .Street Addition that has not been final platted, (Refer to pa 10. ) The dimensions of the lots are similar to those proposed in the Sterlin Street Addition, Discussion-Issues to be Resolved . Street Alignment: The st alignment of Idaho street plan concept on pa 13 Street Addition was approved. Lot 17 must be dropped and Lot corner lot width requirements, 150 Sterlin Street Pond: Avenue is not consistent with the area that was presented when Cave's Sterlin To comp with this concept proposed 16 must be expanded to conform with These chan are illustrated on pa Another concern is that the grading plan proposed with this plat would retain about 3000+ s feet less pond north of Idaho Avenue than approved for the same area in the Sterlin Street Addition gradin plane The preservation of this pond has been a concern of the nei Allowin more of the pond to be filled would also be inconsistent with a findin made b council when the land use plan was amended from Os, open space to RL residential low densit use* That findin was that "preservation of 51 percent of the existin pond and the creation of a storm sewer detention pond on the south end of the site, constitutes the preservation of a reasonable amount of the wetland area." The present proposal would result in onl 42 percent of the ori pond area bein saved, MEMORANDUM City Mana Associate Planner Preliminar Plat Idaho Avenue and Ed Cave and Sons, Cave's Junek Park Jul 15, 1987 Re commendation Approve Cave's Junek Addition preliminary plat (plans stamped ' p p April 20, 1987), subject to the following conditions being met before final plat approval: 1. The plat shall be revised as illustrated on the m The required changes include: i nclud . m ap on page 15. a. Mary Court shall intersect with Idaho Avenue at a rig angle, with Idaho Avenue being he - g shall g through street . The c ity approve the radius of this curve. This alignment shall allow for a row of lots south of the extended street with lot having at least 10f • h each , 000 square feet of area above the easement for the required two-acre-foot pond* ( Refer to Condition Four.) b. Drop Lot Seventeen. ce Expand Lot Sixteen to comply with corner lot dimension requirements. The width of Lots Twelve through Fit 1 i cant , g teen may be adjusted by the applicant, , provided that minimum width and area requirements are complied with outside of the req ' easement (Condition q ed ponding Four). d. Extend the Idaho Avenue right-of-way o the northeasterly ortheasterly extension of the revised northwest ro ert line p p y of Lot Sixteen, e. Revise the west line of Lot One, Block One to provide perpendicular driveway � p ide for a ndicular y intersection with Idaho ..Avenue. The driveway shall be twelve feet wide, with at leas ' t five feet of setback to each side property line. f e Amend the plat boundary to conform with the above ' revisions. 2. An opinion shall be submitted by a certified soil ' s expert which describes the soil correction procedure (s) necessary . to fill the areas proposed as building sites for' the lots west o*f Mar Co procedures shall be included Y Court's These in the developer's agreement. 3 A ponding easement shall be shown on the plat at and below the 1004 contour elevation for the pond north of Idaho tan for Avenue, as approved with the grading p r the Sterling Addition. 4 • A pond ing easement shall be shown on the la p t along the rear portion of Lots 13-16 (as revised in Condition One) e This easement shall include one foot of elevation above the 101 - • 100 -y ear pond design. Each of the adjoining lots shall have at least 10,00 ► P1 square feet of area above this easement, 59 A recordable, quit -claim deed shall be'submit ted to the city engineer for the portion of Outlot A, Sterling treet ' g Addition that will be located east of proposed Lots Seven and Eight, Block Two. The applicant may also include this area in this plat and dedicate It to the public for drainage purposes. 6• A twenty- foot -wide storm sewer easement shall be shown between Mary Court and the pond to the west, The location shall be approved by the city engineer. pp 2 7 . Increase the s i z e of the pond i ng easement proposed to encroach on Lot Two, Block One to that shown on the grading plan with Sterling Street Addition (received 6- 9-86) . In that radin la g g pla the south 87+ feet of this lot was outside of the ponding easement. The building pad shall also be reduced in width to that approved pp with the Sterling Street Addition. The spoils located within the -re uir q ed easement area shall be removed, 80 The final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be approved by the city engineer. These plans shall i but not be limited to : p include, a . The location of the four-inch and larger diameter trees be laved shall be shown on the to grading plan. The location and type of trees to be replanted (Condition 10A) shall be shown the grading plan. in b. The distance between the building d for g p Lot One, Block One and the west property line shall be dimensioned as 27 feet on the grading plan. (A rear yard setback ordinance to allow a 27 -foot setback was approved for this lot as art of the ' • � roval p Cave's Sterling i ng Street Addition approval.) . ) The proposed 1002-foot contour elevation shall not be moved to the east. C9 In the grading plan, show the location of the driveway Lot one, Block One to be consistent for tent with the requirements stated in Condition 1E,. d. The north -south storm sewer on Lots 12 and 13 shall be eliminated. 90 Submittal to the city engineer of a recordable le quit -claim deed for the portion of the required two - acre -foot and ' p (Condition Four) that w i l l be located on the property adjacent to this plat. The le al description shall be approved by the city engine g On page 13 shall be used Y g, eer. The lotting plan to establish the limits of this easement. As much of the natural wetland as possible shall be ' easement. included in the 10. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement engineer g to the city ty with the required surety for the public improvements ' the p meets required for this development, including storm water pond that straddles the west line of the plat. This agreement shall also uarant g ee that. a. Trees will be planted to comply with Section 9-191 (5)(b) rote of the environmental protection on ordinance . b. The prescribed soil correction procedure in Condition Two will be followed, 11. Submit a recordable covenant to the director of ' communa�ty development that restricts the driveway access to Lot Sixteen as revised) to Mar Court unt ( Y 1 Idaho Avenue is constructed west of this plat. 3 CITIZEN COMMENTS Twent two persons who own propert within 350 feet of this site were asked their* opinion of the proposal. Of the seven respondents one is in favor, one had no comment and five are opposed. Those opposed raised the followin concerns: 10 'The lot sizes, as with the Sterlin Street Addition, are for .smaller than the existin neighborhood lots. Staff comment: Each of the proposed lots meets or exceeds ' mnimum lot re for single-dwellin development. The proposal is also consistent with the planned densit for this area, 20 "Near clear cuttin of trees leaves a near wasteland. He (Mr. Cave)..should clear onl enou trees for the house and leave some of the natural beaut I believe that what he (Mr. Cave has done to the land is dis to Maplewood. It is about time some unintimidated .council members look to values of openness instead of the buck. Where's the cit planner involved in this?" Staff comment: When developers be lookin at this site in 1985 cit staff informed them that cluster development (town houses, etc. should be considered to preserve as much of the rid line and trees as possible that ran north/south throu this area* Conse a developer proposed a town house development that would have left the pond and essentiall the southerl one-half of the rid intact* Due to much neighborhood opposition, that proposal was withdrawn, - It was explained at that time that the hill would probabl be significantl altered to subdivide the site into single- dwellin g home sites. A condition of approval for the Sterlin Street Addition re trees to .be planted, as re in the cit environmental protection ordinance, to compensate for the mature trees lost to g radin g . This ordinance re that at least ten mature trees per acre must remain on the site or be replaced 3. Provide an access to Larpenteur Avenue between Sterlin Street -and Lakewood Drive. Staff comment.* The area street plan concept on pa 13 was accepted b the cit council for this area. Accordin to the cit en the traffic which will be generated In this area will not be heav enou to justif the cost of another street to intersect with Larpenteur Avenue, 4. 1 am opposed to an assessments to m propert for this development. Staff comment: The developer will pa all of the costs of the improvements to be constructed on his site. Assessments for a trunk water s y stem have been levied. Assessments for a trunk sanitar sewer are pendin These projects were ordered before Mr. Cave be the Sterlin Street Addition. These projects are needed to allow development. planned in the cit comprehensive plan for the area .,between the railroad tracks and Larpenteur Avenue and between Centur Avenue and McKni Road. 4 5. Wh propose more- development when what is started ,has not sold or been completed? Staff comment: There is no le basis t . o den this second phase of development if it.complies with cit re 60 Stop the nois e on Sunda Heav e doin i site g radin g at 9:30 a.m. on Sunda s outra Staff comment: The applicant's contractor and the cit contractor do-not work on Sunda An area propert owner is apparentl doin this work. There is no code that directl prohibits gradin on Sunda The cit nuisance code ma be able to be applied. The cit en will investi the matter, 7* Clean up the mess in the street on a timel basis. Control the dust! Staff comment *9 The cit contractor for the construction of Sterlin a Street caused the ma of the dust and street problems, due to the substantial amount of fill that was re The fill portion of the cit project is completed, 8* Repair what dama is caused to neighboring propert M front y ard (1590 Sterlin Street has been dama Staff comment: The cit en stated that a written claim should be submitted to him. He will review the content of the problem, a . ssi responsibilit and decide how to correct the dama 90 How can Cave start gradin on this project if the plat has not been approved? Staff comment: A g radin g permit is routinel issued for developments before plat approval is received. An gradin is, however, at the developers risk in the event the plat would be denied or altered. The exception is where there is a significant stand of trees. Gradin is generall held up until council decides whether to re clus.ter development. In this case, cluster development is no lon an option. Council accepted the concept of the proposed Mar Court cul- de-sac when the.Sterlin Street Addition was approved. REFERENCE Site Description Grass'Area: 7.87 acres Existing Land Use: Undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses North A single- dwelling lot and undeveloped p property .planned for low density residential use. East: A storm water pond, five single - dwelling lots and Sterlin Street, g South: Undeveloped land planned for open space and low density residential use, West: Undeveloped land planned for a two-acre-foot cre foot storm water pond and low density residential use. Past Action 7- 14 -86: Council amended the land use lan from P OS , open space to RL, , residential low density, approved three a rear- nd setback r oved the S y ck variances and ' PP Sterling Street Addition preliminary plat with 17 lots and a large outlot for future development. R page P ( to the map on Approval of the OS to R L plan amendment ' to fell in a portion of the pond north of proposed Idaho Avenue was ranted on the ' g e bas i s that "1. Since the comprehensive plan was approved, adopted an environmental plan � the city has ado P onmental protection ordinance. This ordinance requires that a wetland be preserved when it is needed for drainage ponding or water quality treatment ur os P P es. The pond on this site is not needed for either purpose. "2. Preservation of 51 percent of the existing nd g p and the creation of a storm water detention pond on the south end r of the site, constitutes the preservation of a reasonable amount of wetland area. "3. The proposed density would be 14 ercent less than n permitted in low density residential areas. Requiring a furthe ' to q g er reduction in the density preserve more of this pond would be unreasonable and inconsistent with the density guarantee provision of the environmental a protection ordinance." 9- 8--86: Council approved the final plat for the f + rst phase of Cave's Sterling Street Addition (Refer to the property line map on pa a 10 for the lots included in the first phase.) g 7-13-87: Council approved a one- time extension for the unplatted portion of the Cave's Sterlin Addition preliminar plat (the area that makes up the easterl portion of this pro posal subject to the ori conditions of approval. Planning 1 Land use plan designation,: RL, residential low densit and OS, open space (two-acre-foot storm water pond), 20 Zo R1 sin dwellin 30 Permitted Densit 14 people /net acre 4. Proposed Densit 13.0 people/net acre (6.6 net acres 5. Compliance with land use laws: a. Section 30-8 states: "The arran character, extent, width and location of all streets shall conform to standards for street construction on file in the office of the director of public works, includin relation to existin and planned streets, to reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographical conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safet and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the area to be served." Comment** The alignment of proposed Idaho Avenue should be adjusted to conform with the area street plan concept for this area (pa 13). bo. Section 30-8 states: "Lots abuttin upon a watercourse, draina wa channel or stream shall have additional depth or width, as re to assure house sites that are not subject to floodin Minimum lot areas shall not include draina easements." Comment: The proposed gradin for Lots 13-16, Block Two results in less than 10,000 s feet of area (minimum permitted above the re pondin easement, c * Section 9-191 (5 states: Ila. Development shall be desi to preserve the maximum number of health trees. This requirement shall not appl to diseased trees or where a forester certifies that thinnin is needed for the overall health of a woodlot in which case, a specific tree removal plan mu be approved b the cit vlb. If trees are not cut, the densit of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be re to raise the densit above ten ( 10 ) trees per acre, unless part of'a re plantin screen. An trees re to be planted shall be varied in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not include an species under disease epidemic and shall be hard under local conditions. Tree diameters shall be'at least two ( 2 ) inches.. VIC* The applicant shall demon ' strate.that all g radin g which takes place will be conducted in a manner that preserves the r * o zone areation and stabilit of existin trees and provides an ade waterin area e to at least one- half (1/2 of each tree's crown cover," Public Works A two-acre-foot storm water pond is 'planned for the vicinit of - the west line of this development.. (Refer to pa 12 ) . .'This.-pond will be need when the applicant's site develops, kd Attachments 10 Location Map 20 Propert Line/zonin map 3* Cave's Sterlin Street Addition Preliminar Plat A0 Excerpt from the Draina Plan 54, Area Street Plan Concept 6. Proposed Preliminar Plat (Junek Park)' 70 Revised Plat Concept Proposed b Staff 8. Preliminar Plat — separate attachment RIP L_E ' Y LW riF. W' , LOCATION MAP .Q .'jif ;; Attachment 1 n 99.1x' 0" 99.7p' 47.z3�sz.� - , • I L4 bd _ g�,� . I 31. 33' o 9 7' // o t� a . ; o,v a � 5 /�) �$) ,41 / ,n 1 .39 ' 33' 75.' • 1/ 1 O �3) �� /// �� h (J) �( P�� r ^ �43) 00 C ^ ~ I n z o 12 � •a7s.�• � �i.'.�,�' o I � � 3 � f I 3 I $ f + 1 N' .91 at. " C (44) m p �� a N 4b.�c. Q 4 9 8 ., _. Q4 D c In '19.90 88 S (45) -j O o I ■ `^ 1 •o — s 299.45' ��) 2 v o � zo +. Aso' m ~ <s) o o i - 3 ,! 1 r Ian � �t � �'4 (e) ' 9 3.0 (23; o — 4— — 041 — Q � _ - �7� � .� I' d DRAINAU 0 ( of ::' N 1 fi ' : � :; • •• :�7 1 '�'X: � •• ' - 34rAe. 106 (221 m 299.48 - 4 1 _ .....;::•:.,::• ' ��.:: �::: IQ C11 II q s� Remnant Parcel • •��r••:�x y , - -- — — ?;;;:;i;w� : — .. rM '•'� 0 •'••�•:•'•:• :• :' :•• •:•• :' :' • • • • • • • • . N �I m 9 r oo' �') i r34. s 2' 2 (►a�6 I JJJ111 �1• • : :.► •: •::.: _ 93.0' --°- 5 �, . ......... j4 70 4 33 ) 'r �O 03 :•'••••• •1 � : • :'� '•' :• •'• 71 it l � P `11, ( f ••�•'• • i • i • : : : i•: • ': :�•�•::� . • �r : ♦ r • — s ..•.:•.•.•:..•:. :•: .•. :•:•: •�.�:�: —(R-- . .• fa . 299.$9' 0 (49) l •.�•: •ra♦r r• •♦r.r � 1 10 Cz � O ;, •'•• ::• , : r :rrl,••s•• r i n (L7) .• • 1•••� ••:•rr ' \ i / ' S p l i t Line I ' • • /•'�• •:•:a7'i z �': • ;o ,i:; :,: ';;;;; '•'iS 2 �S o} O ..+. _ m. • • . • • frh.•r • ;r • • • . ♦ a r • ♦ ' ':• ::'. r • • r r;•� ay : • �• • • :► • 111 Lit .299. 6 �. � ►'•'•'•'• ..� ,. +. :�.'C•..:. .•. ..:.r •r W � .I ►: :: , i:' + • i f',� ••• t1�: LR•� .'' �� O 4th `/t ++� :•: :': ••,•�Sr••��••• • '*•!: :•:: r :•' — — :� •:• ••:•• : ♦� •�.•f: : N � 14 ° � ;.:;:' ..:..• :: •:•� •:.: tire... 33' 14 AO 7n C0.1� / ••.•i �: r: •: r • •r"' : 1 11 + / V v J er r • 1• 30 3 /do s310 / G 4 . BS _ _ 3 ' 'r,�,5� .•: •. •.. E H C rzo. I 1 _. a o 2 O ("; i Y Ij 1,.. 1d ' 090 a E 2 QO� , I o 0 N N i(s 0 100 7 /20.03 •'►zlob4 °� PJ AV E. z 7s 7 7f 1 S r O NO. L { 2 C A1"eAvp r•. ^�) (7 1 N V c� O HOUSES r po P, U2 ° �• TLOT a f4� 3 -- .o V_7 z 73 7 " d es 75 101.71 d N u39.70 R1 cc i 15 DRAWAG E Es!! t 11G .3G oc,. T LOT G / 1 W 1 -f G3 .84 j ■ ■■ 1 T am mummmummumm 191 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Proposed Cave's Junek Park Addition Attachment 2 10 N I® In ..,`, , Al '��a- �"'�""_'•.+._ //I ��i I 1 I le, • io. - — r t , •• � 1. ,�' , - ....ter. t1� W !1 0 F — f o � :w0 � :,, �t,, roa1 ' wo 1 P 1 for IDAHO A W , VENUE - N . \ M oil LL r V wo f j , o C Cave's Sterling Street Addition. Preliminary 'Plat (Approved 7- 14 -86) Attachment 3 • 11 i i z t 1 rn rn z -+ I -c� MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE -- --r•�� INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES `---�- PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42" EXISTING STORM SEWER ---- - - - - -• OPEN CHANNEL STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME �i -- A - F - -✓ DISCHARGE IN CFS -- CITY LIMITS .................. .EXCERPT FROM-THE-DRAINAGE PLAN 12 Attachment 4 4 N ( ` LARPENTEUR AVE, f7 fry ;j E4. to t3 AAU Ali 5 ) N uj 46 1 � 4 F0 3) ot x 10 LLJ 01 �10 op Uil Z' 't. A �)�7V lolt,o, CA IX opk J jj oil C: b _ji 1 20 L T �. Q� IS 13. _______01LMONTANA AVE CU X10390 0-C, A ll -)L- bi 7 10 9 8.4 PROTECTED WETLAND ILAN AVE'S NEBRASKA ADDITION Tfl 77, low ' v Cave's Junek Park Addition ` �lmm�' . ^. ',�� - � �r��e d with a l f nce pprova o Cave's Sterling Street and Nebraska Additions ]3 Attachment 5 .' 296 0D • 25 76 a NS io to to I I I I i I � iI I 2S 76 so I re rot //s 1 10 ISO ID AVEN o r r NI 30 30 136 �o To 130 V ( ( n I ( :, � � W I ( ' 1 I .I __ /80 _r r 0 � I FA rd _I I IUD 30 30_ I 136 - 129 _. 145 - I / IOU 1 \ I ( �� ` Iro 10 r / CD IV N ir0 160 5n o {' /.I. 411 V4 or ..rec 21 Proposed Cave's Junek Park Preliminary Plat 14 '1 iry N ti A n ti 't (n MI --I Attachment 2 � 1 6 LA • 25 76 LA i I I 76 e a , i/ - 5 41 — ,c _ IDA AVENU 136 130 30 30 � � N ,l, { { D � I � 'r� $ o� ieo• n I ° •r 1 A I _l I I 1 1i tA rq 30 30 { 136 +Y/ Ate. i 1 + iYr yi► . i I � . 1 �- -� M Ql r —52F 145 I ' I F •' I w� 10 I 60 `• OD �1 i 60 50 ovtt /ii►,- o!' rA. NE K or See. 21 Revised Plat Concept Proposed by Staff 15 Attachment 7 4 o k � . •1 �;u m 4 N page 3 If t h i s i nformat ' on cannot be provided before f i na 1 — P 9 1 atti n of phase I is reques d, a twenty — foot —wide utility easement shall be shown on the ou lot between future Riple Avenue and the north line of the outlot. The city engineer mus' approve the location. The elevation of the ewer in phase I sha l accommodate this requested sewer. The wner of the outlo shall deed to -the city a five— foot —wide tempo ry construction easement along each side of the permanent easeme t, if the outl t w i l l be pl at.ted before t h i s sanitary sewer w i l l be construct d. The property owner shall p y for th ' s sanitary sewer if the city engineer determines there s a pub is n eed to route it through p the applicant' site. If t ere i no public need, then the easement shall be vacated u less he property owner to the north guarantees its construction nd he owner'of the outlot and the city engineer agree to the r ng. g. The city engineer shall rove I is developed before the ve final grading, uti lity, drainage and erosion con ans. A construction easement(s) shall be obtained for ansite grading. The drainage plan shall include a temporary f orar p area storm water project de contract. This temporary nd must limit storm water d y P from the site to current levels. h. A signed develope/*ncludi agreemen shall be submitted to the city engineer, with t required s rety, for all re q u i red on —site Public improvements, I. A storm Ovate pond w 2. Storm sewer 3. Street and utilities 2. Approve the reso 1 t ion to rezone this i s p opert from F, farm to R--1, single dwelling y Commissioner�S1ette seconded Ayes - -A dahl, Barrett, Cardinal Fi of a, F* scher, Hanson, Larson, Sletten, Sigmundik Be Preliminary Plat: Cave's Junek Park Mr. Junek, owner of the project property, was present representin ' P g Sam Cave. He stated Mr. Cave said d the conditions of the staff report were acceptable to him. Commissioner Fischer moved approval of Cave's Junek Addition reli ' p urinary plat, subject to the following conditions being et before final la approval: 9 plat 1. The plat shall be revised as illustrated on Ana P q . The required red changes include: a. Mary Court sha -11 intersect with Idaho Avenue at a right angle, with Idaho Avenue being g g he through — street. The city shall approve the radius of this curve. This alignment shall allow for a row of lots g south of the extended street, with each lot having at least 10,000 square feet of area above the easement for the required two —acre —foot pond. (Refer to Condition Fo ur.) ) 7- -z0 -s7 page 4 b. Drop Lot Seventeen. C, Expand Lot Sixteen to conipl y wi th corner lot dimension requirements. The width of Lots Twelve through Fifteen may be adjusted by the. applicant provided that minimum width and area requirements are complied with outside of the required ponding easement (Condition Four). d. Extend the Idaho Avenue right —of —way to the northeasterl extension of the revised northwest property line of Lot Sixteen. e. Revise the west line of Lot One, Block One, to P rovide for a perpendicular driveway intersection with Idaho Avenue. The driveway shall be twelve feet wide, with at l east five feet of setback to each side property line. f. Amend the plat boundary o conform with the ' y above revisions. 2. An opinion shall be submitted by a certified soils expert which describes the soil correction procedure(s) necessary to fill the areas proposed as building sites for the lots west of Mary Court. These procedures shall be included in the developer's agreement. 3. A ponding easement shall be shown on the plat at and below the 1004 contour elevation for the pond north of Idaho Avenue, as approved with the grading plan for the Sterling Addition, 4. A ponding easement shall be shown on the plat along he rear p ortion on of Lots 1 — g �► P 3 16 (as revised in Condition One). This easement shall include one foot of elevation above the 100 —year pond design. Each of the adjoining lots shall have at least 10 square feet of area above this easement. 50 A recordable, quit—claim deed shall be submitted to the city engineer for the portion of Outl of A, Sterling Street Addition that will be located east of proposed Lots Seven and Eight, Block Two. The applicant may also include this area in this plat and dedicate it to the public for drainage purposes. 6. A twenty— foot —wide storm sewer easement-shall be shown between Mary Court and the pond to the west. The location shall be ap by the city engineer. 7. Increase the size of the ponding easement proposed to encroach on Lot Two, Block One to that shown on the grading p lan submitted with Sterling Street Addition (received 6- 9 -86). In that radin p lan th g g p e south 87+ feet of this lot was outside of the ponding easement. The building pad shall also be reduced in width to that approved with the Sterling Street Addition. The spoils located within the required easement area shall be removed. 7 -20 -87 is page 5 8. The final grading, drainage, utility it and erosion y control plans shal.1 be approved by the city engineer. These plans shat 1 i ncl ude but not be limited to: ' a. The location of the four -inch and larger diameter trees to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan. *The location and type of trees to be replanted (Condition 10A) shall :beshown in the grading plan. b. The distance between the building d for Lot One 9 P Block One and the west property line shall be dimensioned as 27 feet on the grading plan. (A rear yard setback ordinance to allow a 27 -foot setback was approved for this lot as art of the Cave's Sterling Street as p art eet Addition approval.) The proposed 1002 -foot contour elevation shall not be moved to the east. C. In the grading plan, show the location of the driveway for Lot One, Block One to be consistent stent with the requirements stated in Condition 1E. d. The north /south storm sewer on Lots 12 and 13 shall be eliminated. 9. Submittal to the city engineer of a recordable uit -claim or required q m deed for the portion i on of the two - acre -foot pond ( Condition Four) ) that will 1 be located on the property adjacent to this lat, The legal description shall be a p P approved by the city engineer. The lotting plan shall be used to establish the limits of this easement. As tau c h of the natural wetland as possible shall be included in the easement, 10. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement to the city engineer for the y 9 eer with the required surety public improvements required for this development, including the storm water pond that straddles the west l i n e of the plat. This agreement shall also 9 uarantee that: a. Trees will be planted to comply with Section 9- 191(5)(b) of the environmental protection ordinance. b. The prescribed soil correction procedure in Condition Two w i l l be followed, 11. Submit a recordable covenant to the director of community ty development that restricts the driveway access to Lot Sixteen (as revised) to Mary Court until Idaho Avenue is constructed west of this plat. Commissioner Sletten seconded A es-- Axdahl Barr y ett, Cardinal, Fi of a, Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Sl etten, Si gmundi k IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS X, COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS A. Council Meeting--July 13, 1987 7-20-87 ti 1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Code Amendment -- Building Setback July 2, 1987 S UMMARY I ntroduction City staff is recommending the adoption o • designed ne P f an .ordinance to require bu ildings 9 d primarily for human occupancy o be se least 10.0 feet from a major or pipel y t back at 7 Background 10 The state passed the Pipeline Safety • p ety Act during the 1987 session. This act requires each city in which a • ' pipeline is located to adopt a pipeline setback ordinance by August 1, 1989. 2. This act also directed the state to adopt a model pipeline ordinance. Local ordinances will have to be at least as restrictive as the model ordinance, 30 The two pipeline corridors that thi ' shown on pa e 4. s ordinance Hance would apply to are J Discussion Need for an ordinance before 1989: If the current development pace Conti • Hues, the majority of developable land along the pipelines in Maplewood ' P will have been developed by August, 1989--the deadline for Maplewood to adopt a ' ordinance. There are at least P pipeline setback ten expected developments adjacent to pipelines, (See map on page 4.) . Since the Moundsview incident Bevel • • . developers have cooperated with the city's request to design plats around a • • 100-foot minimum setback from pipelines, wherever practical. With the 1 • large amount of additional development expected, it is lik ely, however, that some developers will not have the latitude, or possibly not the willingness, lingness to design around this setback, unless required to do so. Finally, even where a developer has P cooperated and designed a development to accommodate the larger s • s may g se tback, the location of the future dwellin g y have to be restricted to maintain the se Without an ordinance, the city's right tback, be challenged. y ght to Impose this restriction may Y Action by Council:, Endorse adodifie --- �.._... Rejecte Date f rom - P ipel i nes 1 Appropriate setback distance: There are many variables to consider in defining relatively ' g safe setback from a pipeline. Homes that are uphill from a pipeline, on porous soils, on a cold day, with no wind require 1 1 0 homes that are downhill- on q less setback than. non- porous soils, on a hot day, with a wind. A bill introduced at the federal level proposed 150 feet of setback for the installation of a new pipeline-from habitab official of the Environmental le structures An ronmental Quality Board believes this requirement will probably have to be reduced to at least 100 feet . to be passed. The fire marshal believes 100 feet of setback is real not be reduced unless the reasonable and should e testimony to be taken by the state establishes that a lesser distance is in the ublic interest, est. Finally, to maintain consistent with previously Y p usly approved developments, the present policy of requiring 100 f should be continued, q g feet of setback Recommendation (Three votes in favor for approval pp ) Adopt the ordinance on page 5 to establish a i el i n ordinance, p p e setback 2 REFERENCE Effect on Subdivisions In the situation where a pipeline runs alon a rear propert line, adherence to a loo-fo setback would re a minimum-depth 75-foot- wide lot to be increased in depth about 22 to 28 feet. This assumes a 30-foot front.- setback and dwellin of 26 to 32 feet of depth. In other words, lots with depths. of 156 to 162 feet would be -re Lots of this depth are not uncommon, particularl in the more difficult to develop areas of southern Maplewood, Past Actions Council has approved several plats for sites in which staff has requested developers to maintain at least 100 feet of setback from the Amoco or Williams Brothers' pipelines. In onl one case, • the Hi Sec.ond Addition, was the 100-foot setback found to be impractical. However, in that case, the developer proposed an oil y s s tem which council accepted as an appropriate miti circumstance, Procedure i's Plannin Commission recommendation 20 Council: first readin second readin and adoption j 1 Attachments is Location Map 2. Ordinance 3 rnr n WAR / •� � I • I Pull I -M 8-N a 0 0 a a uLCw.is KiBarY �.� ("� ■r.rr�Yr.rl.lr.rr ■. ■■ ir■ ■■ .. Amoco Pi j pe l i n e Ir Ei NORM BL- VMS CANA04 ,✓� y 1 C� Y�*rrrrrr Y C� t. � a+i►{M. � �. C�'1 • � / Mme► + � tnesx,n � � � � - � r � a � �•, — 'Brothers �,,, �Ir I all ' , PAUL C N Development Sites: #1 Maplewood Meadows #2 Multiple dwellings #3 Multiple dwellings #4 Multiple dwellings #5 Cave's Currie Street Addition #6 Single dwellings #7 Single /multiple dwellings #8 Multiple dwellings #9 Huntington Hills South #10 Single dwellings. #11 Single dwellings #12 Highwood 2nd Addition #13 Highwood Estates #14 Single dwellings #15 S ingle dw ellings ♦ _ e' 4 r . » » i� Larpenteur 5 6 /r • 0 _ _ w .ns of0 $pACe '3M ' E• j -__. r� 3M �-- w Park— Pa rk ■ c ! f ` �9 L 1 nWOOd 12 Highwood 13/� Park ' -- -14 - ; -15 1 1 ' Pending and Expected Development along pipelines subject to the Pipeline Safety Act of 1987 4 Attachment l ORDINANCE NO-, An Ordinance Re Development Near Pipelines Section le Article XI is hereb added to Chapter 9 of the Maplewood 0 code of ordinances, as follows. ARTICLE .XI * PIPELINE SETBACK ORDINANCE Sec. 9-215* Purpose It is the purpose of this article to protect the public from the hazards of a pipeline leak b re that new buildin desi for human occupanc must meet a minimum re setback. Sec. 9-216. Applicabilit This article shall appl to an new subdivision, buildin or addition proposed to be located within 100 feet of a pipeline-. Sec. 9-217. Definitions Pipeline: pipe with a nominal diameter of six inches or more, located in the state that is used to transport hazardous li but does not include pipe used to transport a hazardous li b gravit and pipe used to transport or store a hazardous li within a refiner stora or manufacturin facilit or (2 pipe operated at a ptessure of more than 275 pounds per s inch that carries g as, Buildin An structure desi primaril for human use or occupanc includin but not limited to, businesses, offices, residences and institutions* Decks, overhan porches, or an similar attached structures shall be considered part of the buildin Sec. 9-218. Buildin Setback All buildin subject to the provisions of this article and all newl created lots shall be desi to accomodate a setback of at least 100 feet from a pipeline. This setback be reduced, where the cit finds that: a the buildin would be protected from the radiant heat of an explosion b bermin or other ph barriers, and b) a 100-foot setback would be impractical or unnecessar because.of existin geograph streets, lot lines or easements, and Attachment 2 c) there will be g uaranteed construction of oil containment s or other miti facilit where the cit en finds that a leak would accumulate within the setback area. The desi must be approved b the cit engineer. Sec. ✓ 9-219. Pipeline Location At the time of application for a building permit, site plan review or preliminar plat, the applicant shall provide a scaled site plan that shows the location of an pipeline�within 100 feet of their site. This location must be based upon field data, .provided b a re land surve usin government surve monuments. The elevation of the pipeline shall be shown in the site plan and on a gradin plan, when such plan is re to be submitted. Sec. 9-220. Lot of Record A proposed buildin on an undeveloped lot of record that cannot be constructed because of this article, shall be allowed to be ,constructed if the buildin is located so to compl with this article as closel as possible. The cit ma re an oil containment s to be approved b the c I it engineer. An existin lot of record in an existin residential area is exempted from this ordinance. Secs, 9-221 - 9-230. Reserved Section 2* Section 30-8 of the subdivision code is amended b addin Subsection 12 as follows: (12) Pipelines. The cit ma re additional lot width or depth to provide enou buildable area to meet the pipeline setback ordinance in Article XI of.Chapter 9. Wherever practical, subdivisions shall be desi with an existin pipeline alon rear lot lines. Section 3* This ordinance shall take effect upon its passa and publication. Passed b the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, this , da of , 1987* Attest: Ma City Cler - A Na kd I page 3 Commiss ner Fischer moved approval of the esol ' ution which approves the PUD ub ject to the following cond i ti s: 1. Adheren a to the site plan and cond' ions approved by. the communi de i gn review board. Future changes to the site "'I ; a,, may be - approv by the board. 2. All uses sha 1 conform with the BC M. b • ( ). bu siness commerc (modified) zoning district-require ents . 3. External speake s shall be d •rected away ay from the dwelli � ng units and the sound hall not a ceed fifty decibels norm � al conversation level) a the res• ential y propert line. 4. The maximum bui ldin hei t shall be one story. 5. There shall be no ex t r or s torage or sale of goods or merchandise. 6. The proposed constru io must be substan i t ally started within one year of coun 1 ap rova 1 or the ermi P t shall become n u l l and void. A six— nth ti a extension may be requested as allowed in Section 36— 42(d) o cit y code. 7. There shall be n vents for a underground de ground fuel tanks within 200 feet of existing re i dence or h 1 t o buildable area of the p lanned unde eloped lots in he Currie Street Addition, south of Larpenteu Avenue, 8. The type and nchoring of undergr nd storage tanks must be approved by the ity fire marshal. Th tanks shall be strapped to a concrete slab. Commissioner WVitcomb seconded Ay s-- Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Han on, Larson, S i gmund i k, Whi t omb Be Acquisition to Harvest Park The commis on and staff discussed the propose acquisition. Commissio er Whitcomb moved that the commission ma ke a findi that the roposed acquisition is consistent wi ' s comprehe sive plan. - th the city's Commiss over Fischer seconded A es - -A y xdahl Barrett, Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Si gmund i k, Whitcomb C. Code Amendment: Building Setback to Pipelines �pelines Secretary Olson explained the staff report • tin P t and necessities of adopting g an ordinance. Commissioner Fischer moved adoption of • P he following ordinance to estab a pipeline setback: 7 -6 -87 page 4 . ORDINANCE NO, An Ordinance Regulating Development Near Pipelines Section 1. Article XI is hereby .hapter 9 of the Maplewood p d code of ordinances, as follows* ARTICLE XI . PIPELINE SETBACK -ORDINANCE Sec. 9 -215. Purpose It is the purpose of this article to: (1) Protect the public from the hazards of a i el ine leak b P P y requiring that new buildings designed for human occupancy must meet a minimum required setback. P y (2 ) Comply with the requirement of the Minnesota Pipeline ine s P Safety Act to adopt a p ip el ine etback ordinance. Sec. 9 -216. Applicability This article shall apply to any new subdivision or building uilding proposed to be located within 100 feet of a P P i eline. Sec. 9 -217. Definitions Pipeline: (1) pipe with a nominal diameter of six inches or more, located in the state, that is used to transport h ' P hazardous liquids, but does not include pipe used to transport a hazardous liquid b avit pipe q y gr y, and, ner i e used to transport or store a hazardous liquid within a refinery, quid Y• ge, or manufacturing facility: or ( 2 ) pipe operated at a pressure of more than 275 square inch that ca pounds per carries gas. Building: Any structure designed primarily for human occupancy, ' but not limited to businesses, P Y• including, ' ., esses, offices, residences and institutions. Buildings designed primarily or non-human anc Y uman occupancy, y, such as warehouses, are exempt. Decks overhangs porches, or any similar attached structures � g tunes shall be considered part of the building. Sec. 9 -218. Building Setback All buildings subject to the provisions of this article rticle and all newly created lots shall resigned to accomodate a setback at least 180 feet from of a pipeline. This setback may be reduced, where the city f i nds that: 7-6 -87 page 5 a) the building would be protected from the radiant heat of an explosion by berming or other physical barriers, and b) a 100 -foot setback would be impractical because of existing geography, streets, lot lines or easements and c) there will be guaranteed construction of an oil containment system or other mitigating facility where the city .engineer. f. i nds that a leak would accumulate within the setback area. The design must be approved by the city engineer. Sec. 9 -219. Pipeline Location At the time of application for a building permit, site to plan P . review or preliminary plat, the applicant shall provide a scaled site plan that shows the location of an pipeline within Y P P. 100 feet of their site. Th i s location must be based upon field data provided by a registered land surveyor. The elevation o Y f the pipeline shall be shown in'the site plan and on a grading plan when such plan is required to be submitted. Sec. 9 -220. Lot of Record A proposed building on an undeveloped lot of record that cannot be constructed because of this article, shall be allowed to be constructed if the building is located so as to comply ith this article as closely s ossible Y • Y P The city may require an oil containment system, to be approved by the city engineer. An existing ot of record � i g 9 in an existing residential area s 'exempted from this ordinance. Secs. 9 -221 - 9 -230. Reserved Section 2. Section 30 -8 of the subdivision code is amended by-adding Subsection 12 as follows: (12) Pipelines. The city may require additional lot width or depth to provide eno -ugh buildable area to meet the i el ine setback ordinance in Articl P le XI of Chapter 9�. Wherever practical, subdivisions shall be designed with an existing rear to Y g pipeline along t lines. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage a publication. P P g and .Passed the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1987. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Ayes- - Nayes -- 7-6 -87 page 6 Commissioner Si gmundi k seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Sigmundi k, Whitcomb a D. Pre l i mi n y Plat: Cave's Currie Street Add i t i oA Secretary Olson"qiscussed the staff report with tpe commission. Commissioner Whitc mb moved approval of Cave's urrie Addition preliminary plat, s b ject to compliance with t e following conditions before final plat ap oval: 19 City eng appr al of final grad i n drainage, utility i t and Y erosion control plans. The grading plan hall maximize preservation, of the hill and trees on of One, Block wo, as much as P oss i b l e, 2. Submittal of recordabl deeds to a city e neer t r y g o transfer ,title of Out 1 ots A and B to the City f Maplewood or dedicate them to the public on the plat for d ai nage and utility purposes. 3. Submittal of a 100 — foot —di me er easement for the temporary Currie Street right —of —way. 4. Provide a twenty —foot drai a easement over the north twent feet of Lot One, Block One. 5. Submittal of a signed d vel oper s agreement and required red suret y for the following items: q as Construction of 11 required ubl i c street and i n and P 9 utility improvement . b. Construction�6f a driveway turnaround for Lot Eight, Block One. / c. Constructi n of a driveway for Lo One, Block One that complies wit the requirements of Sect on 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. his driveway shall be cons ructed as far to the east of th property as possible and be ligned to retain as many matu trees as possible. d. Con ruction of the temporary Currie treet cu 1 —de —sac. 6. Revis'on of the lots in Block.2 to maximiz preservation of the trees an hill on Lot One, Block 2, and provide room for a 100 —foot setback o the future house. 7. S ow the existing, small triangular piece of r ' ht —of -wa a g Y by t e county at the corner of Larpenteur Avenue an McKnight Road. Co mi ssioner Hanson seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, arrett, Fischer Hanson, Larson, Sigmundik, Whitcomb 7-6-87 ORDINANCE NO. ° An Ordinance Regulating Development Near Pipelines Section 1. Article IX is hereby added to Chapter 9 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances, as follows: ARTICLE XI. PIPELINE SETBACK ORDINANCE Section 9 -215. Purpose It is the purpose of this article to: (1) Protect the public from the hazards of a pipeline leak by requiring that new buildings designed for human use or occupancy must meet a minimum required setback. Section 9 -216. Applicability This article shall apply to any new subdivision, building or addition proposed to be located within 100 feet of a pipeline. Section 9 -217. Definitions Pipeline: (1) pipe with a nominal diameter of six inches or more, located in the state, that is used to transport hazardous liquids, but does not include pipe used to transport a hazardous liquid by gravity, and pipe used to transport or store a hazardous liquid within a refinery, storage, or manufacturing facility; or (2) pipe operated at a pressure of more than 275 pounds per square inch that carries gas. Building: Any structure designed primarily for human use or occupancy, including, but not limited to businesses, offices, residences and institutions. Decks, overhangs, porches, or any similar attached structures shall be considered part of the building. Section 9 -218. Building Setback All buildings subject to the provisions of this article and all newly created lots shall be designed to ccomodat a setback of at least 100 feet from a pipeline. This setback may be reduce , w ere t e city finds that: a) the building would be protected from a radiant heat of an explosion by berming or other physical barriers, and b) a 100 -foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary because of existing geography, streets, lot lines or easements, and C R c) there will be guaranteed construction of an oil * containment system or other mitigating facility where the city engineer finds that a leak would accumulate within the setback area. The design must be approved by the city engineer. Section 9 -219. Pipeline Location At the time of application for a building permit, site plan review or preliminary plat, the applicant shall provide a scaled site plan that shows the location of any pipeline within 100 feet of their site. This location must be based upon field data, provided by a registered land surveyor. In addition, the City may require a Registered Land Certificate. The elevation of the pipeline shall be shown in the site plan and on a grading plan, when such plan is required to be submitted. Section 9 -220. Lot of Record A proposed building on an undeveloped lot of record that cannot be constructed because of this article, shall be allowed to be constructed if the building is located so as to comply with this article as closely. as possible. The city may require an oil containment system, to be approved by th y engineer. An existing lot of record in an existing residential area is exempte for this ordinance. Sections 9 -221 - 9 -230. Reserved Section 2. Section 30 -8 of the subdivision code is amended by adding Subsection 12 as follows: (12) Pipelines. The city may require additional lot width or depth to provide enough buildable area to meet the pipeline setback ordinance in Article XI of Chapter 9. Wherever practical, subdivisions shall be designed with an existing pipeline along rear lot lines. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota this day of , 1987 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk TO: Michael McGuire, City Manager From: Patrick J. Kelly, Co -City Attorney Date: July 27, 1987 Expenditures I. Authorized Expenditures .Action by Counoily Endorsed., - Modifie Rejecte Date To sustain the legality of municipal expenditures, three questions must be answered affirmatively: (1) Is the expenditure for a public purpose? (2) Is it within the City's statutory authority? (3) Has it been properly authorized (approved) by the Council? In general, an expenditure will be for a public purpose if its results will be beneficial to the inhabitants of the community as a whole and if it is directly connected with the government of the city. Cities have a very wide range of statutory authority y permitting them to take actions and to spend public funds. The following have been held for public purposes and proper reasons for expenditures of City funds: 1. Payment necessary expenses; 2. Pensions; 3. War memorials; 4. Concerts, lectures. Please see attached addition examples. Summary I believe an expenditure for volunteers sufficiently justifies the following: g I. Beneficial to the inhabitants of the community; 2) Connected with the government of the City. N PJK a )RATION LAW l5 s Y to the chapter on prop •e is additional discussi rents have been peirmjtt$ { rdw G r f limitation— promo tia ; overnments in adverb lging industry and Comm, cases, most were decided -pose, but rather on lac, iat the expenditure of pi municipality was not f ourt ruled that the local .mproperly paid for such held unconstitutional a )rivate purpose the purct proprietary ventures, of it, theorizing that the pu til, and unless, the use' rivate parties . r , )f commerce has been a. _ the p ublic p .ere p P P . r .. McRae (1932) 174 Ga 590, If 701; State v. Cape May (19C NJL 544; Anderson v. San Al (1934) 123 Tex 163, 67 SW 2d 3 Kiel v. Frank Shoe Co. 04 Wis 292,14 NW 2d 164. r 4 Chase v. County of (1976)195 Neb 838, 241 NW 5 Sacramento Ch am ber 0( merce v. Stephens (1931) 2J 60 7 , 299 P 728; Dennis v (1960) 253 NC 400, 116 SE . Count Douglas v. Y of Doug 195 Neb 838, 241 NW 2 d`` 6 Atlanta Chamber of COO v. McRae (1932) 17 Ga E%PENDITURES § 15A .15 � o ur are somewhat inclined to find public purpose in , er indirect ways I of advertising local communities such as rwnting and appropriating money for - conventions.' con - • g expositions and fairs,$ and sending exhibits to exposi- N t5A,15 The public - purpose limitation —care of the poor and ill nding by local governments for the relief of the poor and unemployed is overwhelmingly held to be a proper public nose.l This includes the provision of food and housing. Kcal governments can also spend to provide hospital facili- for the community. While acknowledging considerable ra authority, the North Carolina Court held in 1973 that expenditure of public funds raised by taxation to finance, acilitate the financing of, the construction of a hospital L: Waters v. Bonvouloir (1899) 172 a 286 52 NE 500; Ketchie v. He- cc (1923) 186 NC 391,119 SE 767; ;qtr er v. Chamber of Commerce of Oi gton (1950) 231 NC 440, 57 SE k789; Ruggeri v. St. Louis (Mo 429 SW 2d 765. -State ex rel. American Legion on Convention Corp. v. Smith 40 ) 235 Wis 443,293 NW 161. But ,�e b v, Jacksonville, N 2 supra. axle v. Dade County (1926) 92 '432, 109 So 331; Minneapolis v. y (1902) 86 Minn 111, 90 NW nbor v. Hadley (1928) 291 Pa 140 A 347. elb County v. Tennessee Cen- Exposition Co. (1896) 96 653, 36 SW 694. Comment, L Rev 104. r ' Francisco v. Collins (1932) 187,13 P 2d 912; McNichols v. Denver (1938) 101 Colo 316, 74 P 2d 99; Fox v. Board for Childrens Home (1932) 244 Ky 1, 50 SW 2d 67; Muskegon Heights v. Danigellis (1931) 253 Mich 260, 235 NW 83; Jennings v. St. Louis (1933) 332 Mo 173, 58 SW 2d 979; Kitch v. Middle Coal Field Poor Dist. (1938) 329 Pa 390, 197 A 334. But see State v. Ozawkee Township (1875) 14 Kan 418; Barde v. Funk (1933) 144 Ore 233 24 P 2d 334. 2 Cf. David Jeffrey Co. v. Mil- waukee (1954) 267 Wis 559, 66 NW 2d 362. 3 Aven v. Steiner Cancer Hosp. (1940) 189 Ga 126, 5 SE 2d 356; Craig v. North Miss. Community Hosp. (1949) 206 Miss 11, 39 So 2d 523; Burleson v. Spruce Pines (1931) 200 NC 30, 156 SE 241. (Re1.35 -8 / 83 Pub.020) I 4 y 11113-0 15A.16 MUNICIPAL, CORPORATION LAW Fff Py privatel o perated, -mana and facilit to,be Cori I larg a re basec not in its, j ud g ment, an :expenditure fora e loc al g over was forbidden b the -State'constitution.4LOc . ..... .... e b etter vi t with power -under state law, can raise and s Nnd such spendirIg de ambulance se service provi e as a proper public p 0 UP have a W to h Maine Court held this is so even if ambulance n th the o pportul communit are alread met b a private comp en ed in the at stands to lose part of the value of its business Com Unicati( competition from the local g overnment. 5 i on broadca There is some authorit sustainin the public P expenditures of local g overnment funds to providen." . . . . Th e public-1: peutic or elective abortions for indi women.6 . . vernMe. g o - 15A.16 The public-purpose limitation—recrei g overnments ha and entertainment t l 0 G ove rnmen Spendin for. recreational facilities and act ivities"' d o ther loci. es an larl been sustained as within the public purpose Ur pose doctrine Illustrativel the Minnesota Court in 1978 found spen y other g overnort a sports stadium to be for a public purpose. 2 Howeve have invalidated, as not within the public purpose, p authorities, mental subsidies to private or providin JLV13) 88 Ohio St 71, tional facilities .3 :co mmo nweal V. There are cases den the propriet .of local g over = 21 Pa Super 286; 1-1 ( 1879) 1-2 R1 32 4 5 expenditures for celebrations, entertainments, and a U 4Foster v. North Carolina Medi- 51 Cal 2d 423� 333 P 2d 74510.�` veland v. Artl ( 1939y 23 NE 2d 525. cal Care Comm!n (1973) 283 NC 110, 2- Lifte.au v. Metropolitan 210, 195 SE 2d 517* Facilities Comm'n (Minn 197 V. L N 4 su,- 5Ace Ambulance Service, Inc. v. NW 2d 749. ret (1899) 119 Mic Au (Me 1975) 337 A 2d 661. 3 Da Beach v. King 660 Kennedy v..Ne, Mo A p p 459, 281 SW 6Zurvsk v. Asta (1977) 116 Ariz 132 Fla 273, 181 So 1. ) Pa Assn v. Pi 473, 569 P 2d 1371; Stam v. State (1980) 47 NC App, 209,267 SE 2d 335. 4New London v. Brainard (1 18) 260 Pa 447, 103 A 22 Conn 553 Hood v. Lynn (1861) � 1 Bradenton v. State (1924) 88 Fla Mass 103; Hod v. Buffalo (l v. Teuton Hubbard ; 5 NE 167 381, 102 So 556 Koscis v. Chica Denio (NY) 110; Love v. Park Dist. (1935) 362 Ill 24, 198 NE (1895) 116 NC 2969 21 SE 503. 467, cal Bd. v. St- Lou 514, 11 SW 2 d 104 r 847 Brumle v. Baxter (1946) 225 NC 691, 36 SE 2d 281 Ca en v. Port- 5Law v. People (1877) 87 Ill H (1923) 236 NY land (1924) 112 Ore 14, 228 P 105• Gamble v. Watkins (1879) 7 Los An v. Superior Court (1959) (NY) 448; State ex rel. Tol ( Re1.35-8/83 y. +w. it :.r�r iF x f 'iox raw , iged : and controlled :)r a Publi ic purpose a )n.4 Local government le and spend njoney. er public purpose. .mbulance needs of rivate company whit business because of C1t. � the public purpose Is to provide non - tner, 6 ,nt women. Cation —: and activities hs fi Aic purpose 11lnitatl 1978 found spending rpose. However, co )ublic purpose, gov ions providing rep �f F A: - .y of local governme rtainments, 5 and 2d 423, 333 P 2d 745. , f' `eau v. Metropolitan S as Comm'n (Minn 19' 749. 4 ytona Beach v. 273, 181 So 1. v London v. Bra 553; Hood v. Lynn (1 '3; Hodges v. Buffalo (1 NY) 110; Love v 16 NC 296, 21 SE v. People (1877) 87 v. Watkins (1879) .18; State ex reL` (R "5.41Y3 : , t 6 Most are based if not solely,, upon the absence €k P o wer in the, local. government.' If local power is present, iat seems the better view is. that the public purpose is r esent in such spending. A local government was held by a � rida court to have a valid public purpose —to "provide its fens with the opportunity to obtain a better life by being ire enlightened in the areas of political, cultural, social and ucational communication" in the construction and opera- ''of television broadcast translator stations. 9 ►.17 The public- purpose limitation —aid to other 3 governmental entities deal governments have been permitted to spend to aid the )ral Government,' as well as the states. AS . ,ties and other local governments have also, under the Lc - purpose doctrine, been able to extend financial aid to ous other governmental bodies, including: r port authorities; (1913) , 88 Ohio St 71, 102 NE T ommonwealth v. Gingrich 21 Pa Super 286; Austin v. (Ieshall (1879) 12 RI 329, 34 Am ft �e and v. Artl (1939) 62 Ohio 210, 23 NE 2d 525. V_ . L ynn, N 4 supra, Black 04 0K (1899) 119 Mich 571, 78 Kennedy v. Nevada 1926 r 4 0 F App 459, 281 SW 56; Histori- t Ass'n v. Philadelphia Pa 447, 103 A 824. ubbard v Ta uton (1886)• 140 4 6 7 , 5 NE 167; State ex rel. Vk1 Bd. v St. Louis (1929) 321 ' lI SW 2d 1045; Schieffelin Aft (1923) 236 NY 254 140 NE s 689; Sambor v. Hadley (1928) 291 Pa 395, 140 A 347; Stegmaier v. Goer - inger (1907) 218 Pa 499, 67 A 782; Goodnight v. Wellington (1929) 118 Tex 207, 13 SW 2d 353. 9 Cable- vision, Inc. v. Freeman (Fla App 1975) 324 So 2d 149, 154. 1 Sommers v. Flint (1959) 355 Mich 655, 96 NW2d 119, overruling Younglas v. Flint (1956) 345 Mich 576, 77 NW 2d 84. 2 Vrooman v. St. Louis (1936) 337 Mo 933, 88 SW 2d 189; Briggs v. Ra- leigh (1928) 195 NC 223,141 SE 597. 3 Camden v. South Jersey Port Comm'n (1950) 4 NJ 357, 73 A 2d 55; Visina v. Freeman (1958) 252 Minn 177, 89 NW2d 635. (Re1.35 -8/83 Pub.020) r q "t a t J i, �Y.. f '• i 4. t 7 4 t f Y { q r R y 3 1 _ k' v . a :k r. t fit`; 15A,23 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION L ed: claim&. is upheld. 22 "41 15A.23 The public-purpose limitation ---o emplo Local governments can, within the public-p tion, expend public mone for pensions to off! plo I However, state constitutional clauses ha prevented the pa of pensions retroactive local government emplo who had alread Delaware Court, in a well-reasoned opinion, has'.1"' ". local government can make increased payments sion plan to e the pensions of those alread those to be retired after the passa of the enab Local governments can pa g roup insurance p er . emplo 4 Municipal pa for workmen's corn covera is similarl valid. 5 An occasional case'" municipal spendin for contributions to emplo ee 22Morris v. Tatum (1935) 50 Ga 2d 348. App 315, 178 SE 167. 2 Bul v. West (1.. 1 Adamson v. Little Rock (1940) 426, 125 P 2d 404; State 199 Ark 435,134 SW 2d 558; Fessier berlan v. Love (1912) 89 v. Campbell (1935) 2 Cal 2d 638, 42 P NW 196 Mahon v. Bo • 2d 1020; McNichols v. Denver (1950) New York Cit (1902)'" 121 Colo 45, 215 P 2d 303; Voorhees 63 NE 1107. V. Miami (1941) 145 Fla 402, 199 So 3 Fraternal Order of ' 313; West v. Trotzier- (1938) 185 Ga Shaw (1963) 41 Del Ch 794, SE 902; People ex rel. Kron 734. • er v. Abbott (1916) 274 Ill 3809 113 NE 696; Board of Trustees v. Schupp 4 Opinion of the Just (1928) 223 K 269, 3 SW 2d 606 249 Ala 88, 30 So 2d 14; N M Bowler v. Na (1924) 228 Mich 434, buquer (1921) 27 N . .4 .0 200 NW 258; Vicksbur v. Chrich- 373; State ex rel.'TholnPw low (1944) 196 Miss 259, 16 So 2d phis (1923) 147 Tenn 6 749; Emanuel v. Sproat (1948) 136 Riddlestorffer v. RahweY" NJL 154, 54 A 2d 765• Hammitt v. NJ'Super 36, 196 A 2d"_1 Ga (1913) 144 NYS 127; Thomp- cases). son v. Marion (1938) 134 Ohio St 122, 5Macon v. Benson 16 NE 2d 208 B v. Dallas (1928) 502, 166 SE 26; Hartford. A 118 Tex 28, 6 SW 2d 738; A v. dem. Co. v. Morris ( Tej ( ':. Tacoma (1940) 6 Wash 2d 545, P 1950) 233 SW 2d 218. x (Ra3 kE A q s x ; EXPENDITURES § 15A.24? 1 a , it rn y7 <n r . w 'S iFt aV e at times doubted the public purpose in spending 3 � 7 47 tic government personnel to conventions, but rea- R: 4 . ��` � � �, r �� f f or this penditures of government f o s z � : roper 8 as does spending for local government member- $; * Ice state and national leagues of municipalities and d. h��: � o "icers. There is some judicial opposition to local p` is f l.yp"t;yy� kv; ent spending for investigative trips by municipal per re toys ; 6 ax yty,;• w � , active pay increases to local government, employees ,; u n sustained, 11 as has the payment of such extra com — i r. L ti necessary to ke government employees onr; on as was y p g 1 f p ,4 to public-purpose The limitation— donations to ¢� charity 1 _> weight of authority refuses to find a proper public pur- r local governments using tax funds for contributions to g g y' .. `tees, l although there is a little authority allowing the fi l nditure of government funds for such purpose.' , t a specific state constitutional clauses prohibiting gifts by f { • Wilmington (1926) 3 rel. Schlaeger v. Bunge Bros. (1946) i , zt L parr (Del) 238, 134 A 694. 392 Ill 153, 64 NE 2d 365. - Mars v. Bon 10 vouloir (1899) 172 McCaffrey v. Mayor of Boston ` ?. 286, 52 NE 500• Smith v. Ho- (1925) 254 Mass 50 149 NE 659. - ` _ fr . er (1917) 101 Neb 248, 162 11 Timmerman v. New York City 630 r (1948) 69 NYS 2d 102. w v. Teale (1895) 106 Cal 477, . a 12 Christie v. Port of Olympia r 948; Farmington v. Miner (1948) 27 Wash 2d 534, 179 P 2d 294. 133 Me 162, 175 A 219; Tous- r 3 f - 1 t • Leach (1930) 180 Minn 293, Community Welfare Chest v. 1Fy , t XW 788 Easton (1939) Pitt I J 372, 31 Mun y , F 3 20, 27 North 26.` Glendale v. White ( 1949) 67 Ariz` y ' F 194 P 2d 43 2 Shepherd's Fold v. New York ,t- 5, Phoenix v. - Mi (1884) 96 NY 137. State constitu- 61 Ariz 238,, 148 P 2d ; ;.- OSeville v. Tully (1942) 55 Cal tions at times may specifically au- R F 2d 6 01, 131 P 2d 395; People ex thorize such contributions. 4 , s (Re1.35 -8/83 Pub.020)` s q. S N 2Xtii i r :r I } I i v Y; e 1 § 15A .20 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION LAW "The Constitution does not prohibit the Legisla doing in behalf of the State what a fine sense of ' equity would dictate to an honorable individu ,' Y The Minnesota Court states: `This court has frequently stated that the legisla satisfy an obligation which is not legally binding but, nevertheless, has a basis In justice and equity. Thy = ` situations in which courts have found a moral oblige j where labor or materials have been furnished to, or for the benefit of the state or municipality without sation; where someone has been injured through the; negligence of a public officer; or where states have ized soldier bonuses or fireman benefits. No moral tion, however, was found to justify the reimbursem'` k defeated alderman for expenses incurred in an elect, count, or to justify the payment of bounties to sugar,. manufacturers who relied on an unconstitutional state M Under the eneral rule allowing local government e � g n. tures for moral obligations, municipal corporations have permitted to spend: (a) to pay persons who suffered losses caused by the ernment' 8 y -y, to reward persons who performed heroic acts in sa (b) p p lives at the request of municipal authorities; (c) to compensate persons who furnished materials local government; o to a owners of animals destroyed by local autho,i (d) pay , s AuSable Chasm Co. v. State (1935) 266 NY 326, 194 NE 843, 845, followed in Opinion of the Justices (1968) 354 Mass 799, 238 NE 2d 855. 4 Arens v. Rogers (1953) 240 Minn 386, 61 NW 2d 508, app dism'd 347 US 949, 74 S Ct 680, 98 L Ed 1096. 5 Fuller v. County of Morrison (1886) 36 Minn 309,30 NW 824; Min- neapolis v. Janney (1902) 86 Minn 111, 90 NW 312. 6 Castner v. Minneapolis (1904) 92 Minn 84, 99 NW 361. 7 Minnesota Sugar Co. v. Ive (1904) 91 Minn 30, 97 NW 454. 8 New Orleans v. Clark (1877y. US 644, 24 L Ed 521; In re Salu+ (1937) 34 Hawaii 79; Wrought -U Bridge Co. v. Attica (1890) 119 204, 23 NE 542. ro' 9 State v. Rusk (1931) 37 Ohio 109, 174 NE 142. 4 10 State v . Milby (Ohio App 1{ 119 NE 2d 97. (Re1.35 -8/83 PJ { 4 . • �Y. I I I ►RATION LAW _ fi EXPENDITURES § 0 � 15A 2 ohiblt the Leglslat necessary health .measure, t a fine sense of ju ' ° �� t c ompensate persons injured b in the line comp p J y P . » .orable individual, a r �:to 4 ut . 12 and .=ofd y; F i s Y a owners of land taken by a local government by P ted that the le ' gislatu ; condemnation, when damages could no longer be t le g all bindin bu p y g t . 13 eCured from the municipality in an action at law. Mice and equity. The . hold that it is primarily for the legislative body of the h found a moral obll een furnished to or , government to determine the extent to moral =t ' unicipallty without co satisfied d b the e of public funds. should be satis e y p p ,n injured through the r where states ha ve a the weight of authority, local government payments of f n benefits. No moral a obligations will not be violative of the constitutional tify the reimbursemen ` ' fts of ublic mone 15 upon � p y • in in an ele s inc Ctic nt of bounties to sugar,. . g :: Court held in 1957 that local governments, � Wisconsin Cou g , unconstitutional s ns tai n unto u • absence of legislative authorization, could not apply 1 g overnment e� g iota g F �ubh funds to the payment of claims or obligation ' cl al corporations have are founded upon moral or equitable considerations � hich are not enforceable against the municipalities b g p Y i ''• caused b th+ ed losses y rocess. It should be encouraged to re- examine its pose rformed heroic acts In "' I .I. J �nici al authorities, p v; ew cases have resisted local government decisions to k �{ ' c- medical or hospital bills of citizens inured b police. p J Y p Fho furnished materials: ` `shoul opportunity d be repudiated at the earliest -' �a p 1lestroyed by local auth . Payne v. Jones (1924) 47 SD 1s People ex rel. Central Trust Co. p xr :. NW 472; Kilpatrick v. Com- v. Prendergast (1911) 202 NY 188,95 7 Minnesota Sugar Co. V. Un Claim Bd. (Tex Civ App NE 715; Matter of Borup (1905) 182 c t; =1904) NW ; z , 91 Minn 30, 97 259 SW 164. NY 222, 74 NE 838. 8 New Orleans v Clark Cl ' v. Berry (1933) 262 NY 16 Pubnier v. Ramharter (1957) NE 203. 275 Wis 70, 81 NW 2d 38. HJS 644, 24 L Ed 521; In re _Pinion 5� • . , w ,1937) 34 Hawaii 79, of the Justices (1968) 17 Tompkins v. Williams (Tex 3ridge Co. v. Attica (1890) 6 -.. ?99 238 NE 2d 855. Comm'n App 1933) 62 SW 2d 70; ?04, 23 NE 542. V Milb A Caudill v. Pinsion (1930) 233 Ky 12, y (Ohio pp 1953 ) Y 2d 97. 24 SW 2d 938. , 9 State v. Rusk (1931) 37 ...: a "L09,174 NE 142. :v 10 State v. Milby (Ohio APp x'119 NE 2d 97. S (Re1.35 Re1.35 -8/83 Pub.020) ! I si a Z l cM1 2o- { ,! CITY OF r- � bAAP EWOO 1830 EAST CO. ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 on oy ounc 'vj PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 61 2-7704570 Modifi erl..,., Rej ected.,,.,�..., MEMO D TO: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager FROM: Robert D. Odegard, Director Parks and Recreation ti SUBJECT: Purchase of Mini Park in Cave's Nebraska Second Addition DATE: August 4, 1987 Introduction A search for a Mini Park in the area between McKnight and Century and south of Larpenteur i s a part of the park devel opment pl an . The Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed 2 lots in Cave's Nebraska second addition which meets the criteria for such a park. The Planning Commission on August 3,1987 approved the cap-itol expenditure and found the proposed acquisition to be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Approval of this purchase and the expenditure of PAC funds is requested. Background The City has required that out lot A in Caves Nebraska second addition be dedicated to the City for park purposes and drainage. The developer also is required to grade a trail around the pond and place rock as subsurface for the trail. The City has agreed to purchase 2 lots adjacent to each other and the pond for a Mini Park Site, The Mini Park site is a specialized area trail, play equipment, etc. for a service The trail is in place at thi time and is adn Recreation Commission recommended the Block 3. The two lots will be a total of negotiated Price for these buildable lots that will provide access to the area of� approximately 1/4 mile. about 1/4 mile in length. The Park purchase of lots 10 and 11 in .150' x 136' or 1/2 acre. The is $20,000 each. Alternatives 1. Reject the present mini park site and look for other areas. 2. Purchase the two lots adjacent to the pond as part of a mini park site that would include a pond and trail. Discussion 1 . A v a i l a b l e land in this area still exists due to future development of the Hillcrest properties. Since it is difficult to determine when their development may happen, and the ava i 1 a bl i ti ty of proerty, it is preferred to take the present site. 20 The pond, park and trail make a definite statement ' to the community that we are interested in preserving the environment and providing recreational facilities, We are not a City that has been aggressive in obtaining Mini Parks because of their special use, but this is an opportunity to combine a number of elements into a good .community park. We have examined other land in the search area and recommend this purchase. The Park and Recreation Commission on July 20, 1987 approved the acquisition of the 2 lots at a price of $20,000 per lot. Recommendation it is requested that the City Council approve the acquisition of two lots in Cave's Nebraska Second Addition and approve the expenditure of $40,000 from the PAC Commercial account a • r a s F R3 R3 PUD AVE N R2 F F R 3 Soo AVE . R' R R L Fj MI 2) t Pu o • ml ;r►¢ •::•::• • c. M40LAXE RO R3 R3 SPUD) to M ;*� F R 3 ° m .I *0000 R R Z y Q IF MG •R3 W Q . ?U RZ R3 (PUD) MA RYLAND R AvE R t PU �) R v� R Ota N � BC F f LBO•'• R I AVE wo BE AK R EP C(M) (• .. tw Q - 41 R P MRVES T A C WE F � � ' R R T Lew c� AV DRANO AVE • • W R . _. 3 F ' R 0 r R V , � � . •�� .......... ......... V V VU �" w vv� ' U u uu u0 This map is for pro PAX)m a* and gum al be used where pmcm JIM viol a revered An Ulm C am MP MIM Pwk NP n.g nao.nooe Pw CP Canmwo Pwk CPF convemot pm SU 1-50•�W Use sit.. • cap . EN • I, SIA aw 3m so .1.7.Z i 04 4 44" NP 0 ju . . 8 u go fteme o p to top em ammumso I CAVES NEERASKA. SECOND ADDITION ""Goo INS or. ED CAVE 8 SONS INC. SAW wommosirs IL Irmo 402-964F 91 a Pa I's 0 jdmb 0 - 0 0 of* off to a amm" le IN Allwo ';* 2 z lakl" 3 or now too co L; a ft 11.1 IN. to so" go" oftemmumn 400 omega me ON a .1 Iry 03 "ft" W 41011060 Wal an 9 *Dow's InD ftweamomm smummig IN, 14 sow 6,09 am soma as as Fr:. as db 1 -0419 0 060 (0 —Gave$— as"*$ rol"00 9 of IN 1 010, owl~ moo New now oft son lot Immix quou� 40 ImININNIoNp N seas -w &SV INOM VFW MW so" ft Af 3 A- 13 13 Al !r wowft I slow am 40 aw 40 gave al 40 0 "IN TLOT A flop 1 .0 cl � IN SON SOW fto.0 "Oft -00 10 Oro .00, F13 op IN NNNINN ON IL Is, 1% 01041 Of lb*roll Ad 100e INWOOD` Imm INWOOD wmw "Some -=mono -0-000 sommovae 40 40 so INWOOD 4110 "low INWOOD ~~^` ' SO . ^a"." ~ ~. ~ -. " ^ � � . � r ' , ^ � �^ � " '. ^ ' AGENDA ITEM .� MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & Counci members FROM: City Manager RE: Solid Waste Committee Report DATE: August 3, 1987 INTRODUCTION ,kotion by CounOil tl Endors a - Modifte ]Rej ect = - Dat - - - On December 8, 1986 the City Council requested the Recycling /Slid Waste Committee to consider the options for Solid Waste Collection including Organized Collection. RorvrQni imn The Mi nnesota Legislature passed the Waste Management Act in the 1980 session., It defined local responsi i n controlling solid waste generati and implementing a process of waste reduction, landfil abatement and resource recovery. The Waste Management Act was amended in 1984 and 1985. It was amended again in 1987, empowering counties to require a city to organi its solid waste col l ecti on . The Ma p l ewood Sol i d Was to Commi ttee has been revi ewi ng the opti ons avail abl e and has met on numerous occasions, had input from the local haulers, other governmental agencies and surrounding ci ALTERNATIVES The Committee report l ists three alternatives for the Council 's consideration: . Alternative No. 1 is organized garbage collection in conjunction with curbside recycling* Al ternative No. 2 is staying with the same open hauling system. If the Counci chooses this option, we wi not be able to meet the waste reduction goals set forth by the Metropolitan Council and Ramsey County. Alternative d o. 3 I (City run collection) is not really a practical option because of the cost factor. RECOMMENDATION The Solid Waste Committee recommends Al ternative No. 1. In order to try to meet the City's waste reduction goals, I concur with their recommendation* ACTI REQUIRED Accept the report and request that the Committee work out a detailed plan for implementation, including a time table and public hearing dates . MAM : l nb FINAL REPORT TO: Cit Council Cit Mana FROM: Rec Waste Mana Committee SUBJECT: Or Collection DATE: Jul 30, 1987 Back In 1980 the Minnesota le passed the Waste Mana Act, thereb definin count and local municipalit responsibilities in controllin solid waste g eneration and implementin a process of waste reduction, landfill abatement and resource recover In 1984 the state le amended the WMA re the Metropolitan Council to stud or collection as a wa for municipalities to meet WMA g oals, In 1985 the le a amended the WMA, settin 1990 as the tar date for meetin mandated waste abatement g oals: 16%-19% abatement throu source separation. ( That tar date has since been amended to 1992. As of that date, all waste must be rec composted or sent to a resource recover facilit In 1987 the le empowered the counties to re a cit to or g anize its waste collection the count ma then re separation and collection of rec and other specified materials (e. y ard waste, hazardous materials, etc.. Introduction On December 8, 1986, Councilman Gar Bastian re the Rec Waste Mana Committee to do a research stud of or collection of trash as a reasonable means of meetin waste mana abatement g oals for the Cit of Maplewood. Since that date, this committee has studied reports from other metro cities currentl stud or implementin or collection and studied the Metropolitan Council Solid Waste Mana Guide/Polic Plan viewed the video tape of the Lea of Women Voters panel discussion (March 1985) on or g anized collection-featurin Count Commissioner Robert Orth, Metropolitan Council Representative Chuck Wi Councilman Bob Bennis from White Bear Lake, and Chuck Kutter (Minneapolis)' and Mar A (White Bear Township), representin the refuse haulers met with cit mana of three nei cities that now have or collection met with and discussed this concept with local waste haulers licensed in Maplewood. This final report is presented for y our information as y ou choose the direction Maplewood will take in meetin le g oals in waste management/disposal, Alternatives Considerin the le mandates, the count waste mana master plan and the rec abatement g oals for Maplewood, we present three options for y our consideration. 10 Or Collection: or collection is a solid waste collection s where one hauler services households in a specific area (no overlap) and in which services can be defined and controlled (e. volume based fees, curbside rec and y ard waste pickup The cit assumes collection control and responsibilit and contracts for the service throu bid or ne contract, a. Or collection should include volume-based g arba g e fees, rec and compostin fees. Accordin to fi in the Ramse Count Solid Waste Mana Master Plan, it will be si less costl to meet cit compostin rec and waste reduction g oals with or collection. For the individual homeowners, those who rec and composte their wastes will pa less than those who do not, b. Based on MnDOT research, road wear due to refuse collection trucks could be reduced 40%-50%. Road surfaces are particularl affected b heav wheel loads. The number of refuse trucks on an one Maplewood street on trash collection da varies from 2-10 the effect on the roadwa of one of these trucks is the same as that of 1,500 cars, co With or collection, all homeowners will have g arba g e collection resultin in less ille dumpin reduction in odor and rodent problems, and reduction in potential safet hazards possible when such vehicles are present. Reduction of the number of lar refuse trucks in residential nei would result in less noise pollution, do Cit control of waste disposal standards and licensin is possible throu bid or contract re The cit could control/ne specifics: uniform collection re use of containers, method of disposal, uniform volume-based fee structure, reportin re determination of collection routes, y ard waste and rec e. Administrative and ne responsibilities would be handled throu the cit mana office, f. A consortium of existin haulers could be formed as a ne and communications bod with the cit Service standards, collection routes, rec services, etc., would be ne b this g roup and the cit mana g o Cit billin usin the current utilit billin s is deemed the most efficient. Delin char could be handled as are such fees for sewer and hydrant, 2e Present open haulin s Open haulin means each homeowner arran with a haul-er of . choice for waste pick-up and is billed directl b that hauler. This s does not normall include source separation ( rec y clin g , compostin Some haulers ma currentl do some source separation. The open haulin s in its current form is onl le until 1990, when, b le mandate and Ramse Count master plan, Maplewood will be re to g ive documented proof that we are rec 120 of the residential waste we g enerate. In order to meet this 12% g oal, curbside rec is necessar ( it is estimated that 3%-4% abatement is realized b a rec drop-off center, and 4% abatement is possible with a compost drop-off site. To q ualif y for count fundin aid for curbside rec ( onl to 1990 Maplewood must show that we've made plans and pro in implementin or collection or manditor source separation. B 1990, Maplewood must have a curbside rec pro in place. Count fundin is available until 1990 to aid in establishin such a pro but the cit must provide for continuin operation of curbside rec pickup for homeowners. Accordin to 1987 Waste Mana le Ramse Count is authorized to re its cities to or g arba g e collection. In 1988, the count will decide if an ordinance makin or collection mandator is necessar At the present time, the count is providin technical assistance to cities to help them plan an efficient refuse collection s with economic incentives to residents for compostin and rec 3. Cit operated refuse collection: This s means the cit bu the trucks and hires the personnel to provide trash collection service to each residence in the cit The potential purchase, maintenance and mana costs of this s should be available throu the department of public works and the cit mana Due to the hi bud outla as well as continuin maintenance and personnel costs, this option is not recommended, Recommendation In consideration of meetin mandated waste abatement g oals and strivin to provide cost efficient, environmentall sound waste disposal for the cit and its residents, this committee recommends alternative number one, or collection. Due to impendin compliance with state and count re alternative number two, . present s "as is", is not recommended. Should this option be adopted, implementation of curbside rec and other abatement methods (e. y ard waste pickup, volume-based incentives, etc. will be necessar Due to the hi initial bud outla as well as continuin maintenance and personal costs, 'item number three is not recommended. This committee accepts the responsibilit to work with the council, cit mana and licensed haulers, to work out a process of implementation. Table 1 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE SERVICE RATES PER HOUSEHOLD WITHOUT COMPOSTING AND RECYCLING YEAR OPEN HAULTNG ORGANIZED 1987"' $128*70 $103*90 1990 $150*50 $121e90 1992 $165e60 $134.00 Table 1 shows the expected costs for g arba g e collection for the next five y ears. These costs assume g arba g e service simila to service currentl provided b most g arba g e haulers (i. e. no rec or separate y ard waste collection), As Table 1 shows there is a 20 percent savin when comparin or collection versus open. haulin colleption, Ad ina Rec 1 in and Compostin Curbside rec and y ard waste collection and compostin are pro which will be necessar for Maplewood to meet the 16% waste abatement g oal. At best rec can achieve 7 to 10% residential abatement dependin on the service public education and other factors. Costs for the rec service were calculated at a 1987 cost of $3.67 per household per y ear, escalated 5% annuall Compostin will abate from 6 to 9 percent re' side.ntial waste dependin on service and other factors, Costs for separate y ard waste collection durin the g rowin g season will. cost $11.42 per hou per y ear. Table 2 shows the costs for curbside rec and separate y ard waste collection under an open haulin s and under an or g arba g e collection s The cost, differences under these two t of g arba g e collection are caused b 1. A 20 percent savin under the or s which is due' to g reater efficienc in g arba g e haulin .(300 households serviced dail under /or g arba g e collection as opposed to 250 households serviced dail under an open haulin s ; 2. Disposal fees at the Resource Recover Facilit are avoided with materials that are composted and rec 3. Garba collection costs are lowered because less waste is collected in g arba g e compactors, These savin are not realized without or collection. This is showin in Table 2 TABLE 2 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE COLLECTION, YARD WASTE COLLECTION, AND CURBSIDE RECYCLING SERVICE COSTS WITH AND WITHOUT ORGANIZED COLLECTION PER HOUSEHOLD. YEAR- OPEN .HAULING ORGANIZED 1987 $143e79 $104o94 1990 $167*66 $122982 1992 $184e87 $135e25 For the City I of Maplewood, the annual cost savin of or versus open haulin collection are shown in .Table 3,o For 1987 Maplewood residents can save approximatel $400r000 per y ear and be serviced with weekl g arba g e service., curbside rec service and separate y ard waste collection and composting. TABLE 3 ANNUAL COST SAVINGS FOR THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WITH ORGANIZED GARBAGE COLLECTION, CURBSIDE COLLECTION AND YARD WASTE COLLECTION SAVINGS WITH ORGANIZED COLLECTION PER PER HOUSEHOLD $38o85 44984 49e62 TOTAL FOR MAPLEWOOD $399,770.00 493,240.00 578,570.20 it is also interestin to note that with or collection, rec and compostin costs are similar to the open haulin s without rec and compostin provided* NUMBER OF YEAR HOUSEHOLDS 1987 10 1990 ilr000 1992 11r660 SAVINGS WITH ORGANIZED COLLECTION PER PER HOUSEHOLD $38o85 44984 49e62 TOTAL FOR MAPLEWOOD $399,770.00 493,240.00 578,570.20 it is also interestin to note that with or collection, rec and compostin costs are similar to the open haulin s without rec and compostin provided* SOLID WASTE COST A14ALYSIS MARCH 1987 0 14APLEWOOD Gone are the da of a' sin service for g arba g e collection and disposal. . In the he future, rec compostin and waste reduction must increase substantiall in order to meet state mandated g oals for landfill abatement, Since man of these pro are still in the developmental state,, -we have the opportunit now to affect the desi and cost of the future s The desi of the future s will be determined in part b the Ramse Count Solid Waste Mana Master Plan, Future costs will be affected b the approach used for the collection s Two main approaches are possible, open g arba g e haulin as is currentl done, and or collection, Or g arba g e collection can reduce costs si b increasin efficienc The current avera or collection cost for the three cities in Ramse Count that use this approach is $7.53 per household per month. The current avera open haulin cost in Ramse Count is about $9.50 per household per month, with man people pa $10.50 and more. Accordin to a stud prepared b Gordian Associates for the Cit of St. Paul in 1980 a sin g arba g e truck with no increase in c osts can service 20% more accounts per da in an or collection s as opposed to an open haulin s This increase in productivi reduces the per household cost for g arba g e collection, In addition to the collection efficienc savin noted above, or collection allows avoided costs of disposal to be factored into residential g arba g e bills. The followin situations cause lower fees for waste disposal. 1. Disposal costs are less per ton for wastes rec or composted as opposed to those wastes processed at the Resource Recover Facilit 2. Garba collection costs are less with a y ard waste and rec pro because less g arba g e is hauled, 3* If residents perceive or actuall g et an economic incentive for participatin in rec compostin and waste reduction pro the participation increases and further increases-the costs savin mentioned in number 1 and number 20 Summary f Waste Management Act Amendments!, 1987 June, 2, 1987- o ge Chapter. 348 -- HF 794 (Long); SF 708 (Merriam) Page 4 Sect 34 e xtends P xt nds the special al P of i ce officer powers of the Department of Public � Service, Division of weights and Measures inspectors, authorizing them to arrest without formal warrant, retai of motor oi and automotive batteries if i n violation of the si gnage requirements of sections 37 and 380 roh i bi is the Department of Public Service from ,charging f ees to Section 35 p p recover the costs of enforcing sections . 36 to 380 Sectio 36 re quires the Division of Weights and Measures to produce and distribute the signs required in sections 37:and 38 and-to inspect retailers of .motor oil and automotive batteries to insure compliance with those sections. Section 37 specifies g ci f i es l an ua a .for signs requ i red at retail outlets . of motor oil to direct customers . to coll ection tanks for used oil. eq Section 38 r e q uires wholesalers and retailers of automotive batteries to accept used batteries for recycling and requires retailers to post a specified notice of coll ections , ORGANIZED COLLECTION (Se ction 27) Section 27 g rants city or town the authority to organi collection of some or a nts a y -all of the solid waste released by generators for col 1 ection as a municipal service or by ordinance, franchise, license negotiated or bidded contract or other means. The loyal government unit may not impair, through' organ zed collection, the preservation and development of recycling and markets for recyclables, and must exempt recycl abl es if shown that the materials a s will be source separated, collected and delivered for recycling0 nt un i n prop i n pla i n and establishing an organize * d The local governme p P 9� P 9 collection system, must follow an orderly process. At 1 east 90 days before proposing the means of organizing collection the city or town must pass a resolution of intent to - organize -col l ecti on and invite interested persons to participate ate in the establishment.of the system. A two week advance public notice and a public hearing must preceed passage of the resolution. Duri the 90 day p eriod, the city or town. must develop, or supervise the development of, pl ans for the organized collection system. The local government unit may employ the assistance of solid waste haulers and others i n .devel oping the plans and establ the organized coll ection system. If organized collection is done by contract or as a municipal service, a ' waste faci lity may be designated as long as i n conformance to any designation ordinance adopted under section. 115A.860 Counties are g i r ranted the authority to require cities and towns to . organize collection. The county ordi nance may requi (a) separation and collection of rec cl abl es; (b) specific material to be separated; and (c) cities and towns to Y meet source separation standards in the county plan. If the city or town does 4. not comply, the county may organi collection for it. A Ult-Y 01' M,')I)A-ev�ood Solid Waste Nianav g ement Task Force - Januar 1987 hathl.een Jue-nemann, Chairman Teacher/homemaker/Communit Volunteer 1- ?71-367 721 N't - Vernon Ave E Maplewood 55117 CharIotte Wasiluk, Council Rep. Allaplew'ood. Cit Council 776-nm%7183 1740 Fra hk.. St Iv.'a.p 1 e w o o d 551.09 Robert Wen ,C-it Commp Serv, Environmental Health. Official, Maplewood 770-4560 bus, 1019- 93rd Lane NW Coon Rapids 1 757--7888 home Rita Brenner Maplewood Parks Comm*/#622 Comm. Ed. Adv.Bd, 2673 Upper Afton Rd.. Maplewood 55119 Colleen Halpine Ramse Co. Environmental Be*alth 10 10 010 Wo Co. Rd. B Roseville 55113 G re y Juenemann Sr-Tecb.Serv.Rep, 3M Co. 721, Mt-Vernon Ave. E. Maplewood. 55117 Judith Z. Ro Homemaker /Communit Volunteer 711 Skillman Ave. E. Maplewood 55117 Chuck Wi Met. Council 2892 q. kiar Lane Naplewood 55109 739-0625 633-0316 736-0329 bus. 771-3670 home 774-0604 483-1313 bus, 770-0283 home AGENDA NUMBER,J AGENDA....REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director SUBJECT: Suburban Rate Authority Membership DATE: July 31, 1987 INTRODUCTION Action by ounoil Endors e . odifie Rejectec7 Date Maplewood's 1987 membership fee for the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) has increased to $2,100 from $1,200 in 1986. A budget transfer of $860 is needed if the Council wants to continue its membership. RAr_KrRn1IND Attached is financial information for the SRA for 1986 -1988. Most of the SRA expenses are for legal costs related to drafting and negotiating franchise agreements and for reviewing uti rates. In 1978, the Counci adopted ordinances provi ding for gas . and electri franchises with Northers States Power. These franchise agreements were drafted by the SRA. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve an $860 transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account to finance the increase in SRA membership fees. 2. Discontinue membership in the SRA, nT Th.e.. basic issue is whether the City receives $2,100 of benefits per year from its membership in the SRA. Since the Minnesota Public U t i l i t i e s Commission regulates utility rates, it is questionable if the SRA is needed for this area. Regarding franchise agreements, if new ones are needed, the City could request the utility to send copies of those i n effect with other cities. eased upon this, it i s doubtful the City receives $2,100 of benefit per year from its SRA membership. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City terminate its SRA membership effective September 1, 19870 ACTION REQUIRED Motion to approve termination of SRA membership effective September 1, 1987* DFF:1nb LeFevere Lefler Kennedv O'Brien K Dri>lwz 2000 First Bank Place West Minneapolis Minnesota 55402 Telephone (612) 333 -0543 Telecopier (612) 333 -0540 Clayton L. LeFevere Herbert P. Lefler J. Dennis O'Brien John E. Drawz David J. Kennedy Joseph E. Hamilton John B. Dean Glenn E. Purdue Richard J. Schieffer Charles L. LeFevere Herbert P. Lefler III James J. Thomson, Jr. Thomas R. Galt Dayle Nolan Brian F. Rice John G. Kressel James M. Strommen Ronald H. Batty William P. Jordan Kurt J. Erickson William R. Skallerud Rodney D. Anderson Corrine A. Heine David D. Beaudoin Paul E. Rasmussen Steven M. Tailen Mary F. Skala Christopher J. Harristhal Timothy J. Pawlenty Rolf A. Sponheim a Professional Association MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: SRA City Managers SRA Counsel July 16, 1987 1988 SRA Budget and Assessments At its July 15, 1987 quarterly meeting, the Suburban Rate Authority Board of Directors adopted the budget which was proposed by Board action at the April meeting and which was distributed to SRA city managers by memorandum dated May 18 1987. A copy of the one -page budget is enclosed. The budget calls for assessments at $350 per vote, which is the same as last year's assessment. The second enclosure is a tabulation of SRA membership, votes and assessments prepared by the treasurer to show the status of 1987 assessments. This list can also be used, of course, to determine the 1988 assessment for your city. Your continuing support of the Suburban Rate Authority is appreciated. Invoices for the second half of 1987 dues will be out in August. Questions or comments can be referred to John Wallen, Finance Director at Edina and SRA Secretary- - Treasurer; to John Anderson, City Manager of Shakopee and SRA Chairman; or to me. 1988 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BUDGET 1987 N Assets: ' Cash and Investments (3/31/87) Receivables (assessments) Interest Income Less Adjustment (uncollected assessment) TOTAL Anticipated 1987 Expenses: 1987--88 NSP Electric Case SRA Uniform Electric Franchise r Mi.nnegasco General (Fees and Disbursements Northwestern Bell Telephone Case MWCC, Miscellaneous TOTAL Anticipated Year -End Position ! 1988 t { Assets: f Carryover E Membership Assessment (at $ 350 /vote) TOTAL Expenses: General Matters Fees General Matters - Disbursements e eats a 1987 -88 NSP Electric Rate Case `! MWCC , Other Projects Gas Utility y Rate Case Telephone Case Northwestern Bell Tele P 1988 NSP Electric case /Contribution to Municipal Pumpers pers Contingency Fund 71 TOTAL RESERVE $ 10 , 000 1,000 10 , 000 10,000 10 , 000 2,500 $ 13,000 3,600 20,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,430 GE p $ 38,100 52,500 2,500 1,000 $ 94,100 $ 43,50Q $ 50,600 $ 50,600 51,100 $ 101,700 $ 61,030 $ 40,670 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY STATUS OF ASSESSMENTS RECEIVABLE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA As of June 30, 1987 BALANCE VOTES ASSESSMENT PAID DUE Bloomington 17 $ 5950900 $ 5950900 $ 0900 Brooklyn Park 9 3150.00 1575.00 1575.00 Burnsville 8 2800900 1400 .00 1400.00 Champlin 2 700.00 350900 350.00 Circle Pines 1 350.00 175.00 175.00 Columbia Heights 5 1750.00 875.00 875.00 Deephaven 1 350.00 1754.00 175.00 Eden Prairie 4 1400.00 700.00 700.00 Edina 10 3500.00 1750900 1750.00 Fridley 7 2450.00 1225.00 1225.00 Greenwood 1 350900 04,00 350.00 , Hasting 3 1050.00 525900 525900 Hopkins 4 1400.00 700900 700.00 Lauderdale 1 350.00 175.00 175.00 Maple Plain 1 350.00 175900 175.00 Maplewood 6 2100.00 1050900 1050.00 Minnetonka 8 2800.00 1400.00 1400.00 Minnetrista 1 350.00 175.00 175.00 New Brighton 5 1750.0 1750.00 0000 North St. Paul 3 1050.00 1050.00 0.00 Orono 2 700900 350900 350.00 Osseo 1 350.00 350.00 0000 Plymouth 7 2450.00 1225.00 1225.00 Richfield 8 2800900 1400.00 1400.00 Robbinsdale 3 1050.00 525.00 525.00 Roseville 8 2800.00 0.00 2800.00 Shakopee 2 700.00 700.00 0100 Shoreview 4 1400.00 700.00 700.00 Savage 2 700900 350.00 350.00 Spring Park 1 350.00 175.00 175.00 St. Louis Park 9 3150.00 1575900 1575.00 Wayzata 1 350 900 175 .00 175 .00 - s t--St . - -4 - -1- 4-98 -:-80- --0 :f}0 #9 1�,, --14 -06:00 vt/'� 1 Woodland 1 350900 0.00 3 50.00 ` 146 $ 52 500.00 S 28700.00 $ 23800900 � 1 1116 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN CASH BALANCE SAINT LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA _ FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1986 Balance at January 1 1986 $ 10 321.66 ' Additions Interest income $ 4 , 616.73 Sale of investments 65,860948 . Donations .100000 Special Assessments - 1986 - See Schedule attached for details 30,200.00 .Special Assessments - 1985 2, 576.70 Special Assessments - NSP Rate Case 28,720.90 132,074.81 $142,396.47 Deductions:. Accounts payable: LeFevery, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien and Dr awz $ 4 6 , 58 3.61 Dahlen and Hoedeman & Co. 41, 806.00 Board of Water Commissioners 7, 500.00 Dinner guests 40.00 95 929.61 • Balance at December 31, 1986 $ 46, 466.86 Note A: The breakdown of legal costs are as follows: General $ 9 , 7 56.0 7 Metropolitan Waste Control 225.75 SRA Electric Franchise 1, 998.50 Northwestern Bell 3 , 744.34 Intrastate Access Tariff 1 MPUC Legislation 2,488.20 NSP Electric 23 , 915.51 NSP Gas Rate 2 489 .'ll $ 4 6 , 58 3.. 61 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY STATUS OF ASSESSMENTS RECEIVABLE SAINT . LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA As of December *31, 1 BALANCE VOTES ASSESSMENT PAID DUE Bl oomington 17 $ 3400.00 $ 3400.00 $ 01000 Brooklyn Center 7 1400.00 1400.00 0.00 Brooklyn Park 9 1800.00 1800.00 0.40 Burnsville 8 - 1600.00 1600.00 0000 Champlin 2 400.00 400.00 0000 Circle P ines 1 200.00 200.00 0.00 Columbia Heights 5 1000000 1000 01000 Deephaven 1 200.00 200.00 0000 Eden Prairie 4 800.00 400.00 400.00 Edina 10 2000.00 2000 00 01900 Fridley 7 1400.00 1400.00 0.00 Greenwood 1 200900 200.00 0000 Hasting 3 600.00 600.00 01000 Hopkins 4 800.00 800.00 0000 Lauderdale 1 200.00 200.00 0000 Maple Plain 1 200 900 200.00 01000 Maplewood 6 1200.00 1200.00 0.00 Minnetonka 8 1600.00 1600 "000 0004 Minne ista 1 200000 200 . o0 0000 New .Brighton 5 1000000 1000000 0000 North St. Paul 3 600.00 600.00 0000 Orono 2 400.00 400.00 00 00 Osseo 1 200.00 200.00 01000 Plymouth 7 1400.00 1400900 0000 Richfield 8 1600.00 1600.00 0000 Robbinsdale 3 600.00 600.00 0.00 Roseville 8 1600.00 1600900 0000 Shakopee 2 400.00 400.00 0.00 Shoreview 4 800.00 800.00 01000 Savage 2 400.00 400.00 0000 Spring Park 1 200.00 200.00 0.40 St. Louis Park 9 1800.00 1800.00 0000 Vadnais Heights 2 400.00 0000 400.00 Victori 1 200.00 200.00 0000 Wayzata 1 200.00 200.00 0900 Woodland -1 200.00 0.00 200.00 $ 31200.00 $30200.00 $ 1000900 w.w.�www 10 w City City City City City City City Sain SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -- NON MEMBERS NORTHERN STATES POWER - RATE CASE For Year Ended December 31 1986 of of of of of of of t P Maple Grove St. Paul Sartell Forest Lake Waite Park Mahtomedi West St. Paul aul Public Schools TOTAL COLLECTED TO DATE $ 1,026.25 20,000.00 171.35 229.80 174.60 192.55 926.35 6,000.00 TOTAL 28,720.90 $ 34,705.00 ------ - - - - -- OWING 1985 ASSESSMENT City of Vadnais Heights City of Woodland $ 736.20 368.10 $1,104.30 Action by Council:, Counci lmember Bastian asked that the council consider amending the condition requiring the restoration of NAPA's store front, Background Prior to occupying the Plaza 3000 north annex, NAPA painted their store front blue to coincide with their national image and color scheme. On February 24,1987, the design review board required that NAPA restore the concrete block store front and the lower fascia to the original color. This was to be done by sandblasting or any other method, other than painting, which would expose the original materials of the facade, On April 13, council considered an appeal by NAPA of the board's requirement; a motion for approval of the appeal failed by a tie vote, and the board's recommendation remained. Alternatives 1. Sandblasting and refinishing NAPA only. 2. Sandblasting and refinishing the entire building front. 3. Repainting NAPA to match the rest of the stores, 4. Repainting the entire building front. 5e Allow the blue facade for NAPA, Discussion 10 Sandblasting NAPA only would take off the fine -sand aggregate coating with which the building is finished and expose the concrete block underneath. This would leave NAPA looking noticeably different from the remainder of the building. Refinishing the block with a similar coating, such as stucco, may get close to the original texture, but a color match would be no better than that obtained by painting. 2. Sandblasting the entire building front and then refinishing would attain uniformity but would be expensive. 3. Repainting to match would be difficult s i nce the building is finished in a two -tone color of light and dark brown. However, MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modified TO: City Manager Re j ected„ FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Amendment of Design Review Board Requirement LOCATION: 2029 Woodlynn Avenue APPLICANT: NAPA Auto Parts OWNER: SBF Associates PROJECT: NAPA Auto Parts Store DATE: August 5, 1987 SUMMARY Introduction Counci lmember Bastian asked that the council consider amending the condition requiring the restoration of NAPA's store front, Background Prior to occupying the Plaza 3000 north annex, NAPA painted their store front blue to coincide with their national image and color scheme. On February 24,1987, the design review board required that NAPA restore the concrete block store front and the lower fascia to the original color. This was to be done by sandblasting or any other method, other than painting, which would expose the original materials of the facade, On April 13, council considered an appeal by NAPA of the board's requirement; a motion for approval of the appeal failed by a tie vote, and the board's recommendation remained. Alternatives 1. Sandblasting and refinishing NAPA only. 2. Sandblasting and refinishing the entire building front. 3. Repainting NAPA to match the rest of the stores, 4. Repainting the entire building front. 5e Allow the blue facade for NAPA, Discussion 10 Sandblasting NAPA only would take off the fine -sand aggregate coating with which the building is finished and expose the concrete block underneath. This would leave NAPA looking noticeably different from the remainder of the building. Refinishing the block with a similar coating, such as stucco, may get close to the original texture, but a color match would be no better than that obtained by painting. 2. Sandblasting the entire building front and then refinishing would attain uniformity but would be expensive. 3. Repainting to match would be difficult s i nce the building is finished in a two -tone color of light and dark brown. However, painting a comparable color would at least rovide a closer color r match than the present blue facade and would uphold the purpose and intent of the ordinance. .4. Allowing the blue facade to remain would set a bad precedent that may, encourage other stores in shopping centers to act without city approval. Recommendation Denial of the request by NAPA Auto Stares for a blue store front at the Plaza 3000 north annex, on the basis that: I. The blue store front detracts from the building's uniform design and appearance. 2. Approval of this request would circumvent the function and purpose of the community design review board, which strives to attain a uniform and attractive design in shopping centers. 30 Approval would set a bad precedent, encouraging other tenants in shopping centers to act without city approval. The applicant shall repaint the NAPA store front a brown color comparable to the original building color by September 15, 19870 Painting is being allowed as a restorative measure since the unique coating on the concrete block could not be reapplied if removed by sandblasting. • - Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 40 Applicant's Letter 5. Letter from James Arbuckle 6. Letter from Hemming Bernina 2 ■m k IN (\I C OUN T Y ROAD T30NR22W 34 3 V29NR22W 13) BR IENWDot) (4) E. BRENNER BEAR LAKE (3) N CHPPE *A (6) N. GARTIE N. &A A Fty R. 19 GALL_ W AV 4) (4) AM FURNESS -2- CS) CT rp A 4 AY E LYDIA 9�- - - rffif A (3) -� j M =AP VIEW'Aw (I.) MAKE LANE (2 A CHI PPE WA C114CLE (3.) CHIPPEWA AVE. NORTH ST. PAUL DEMONT I-L > w w KOHLMAN AVE. N, A J 2640 No EDGENIU. Ito. do AV "i If f AVE. do AVE. :: 2400 N _ . F n36 LOCATION MAP' Attachment 1 4 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N vira lot Z .53.x, h v O Z'6 M 46 - r v C• 3 4 0. k �;- - 0 4 C� � 3t� M NORTH 3 0 1 M . o o.�c . (`) CST) _ ,, ° 00) :+ ri - v' CrPOP � 1 op Pot so 4. it lo 29 -.911 10 -amp MEOW AL- _ u - --• — — — — — — — ,• 114.E -.,1 N - . Y Fl. • 1 p E NNY S �. - - � �r a m ' - out � so t A 1•tpf , PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N - r r oe s PLAZA 3000 NORTH 3 0 1 ANNEX ! 0 s� FIRESTONE v v' � 1 op Pot so it lo 29 -.911 10 Fl. b A 40 -n c. , 0 o4- PLAZA 3000 tool • �, ; 29.31 197.95 13 s ' 0 Co s ~ I a jr ►70, ;C vi ,r s � ... ... .... _ ._ .,_ _ _ ,_ . s 2D4-6Z so t al _ Q 1 Poe. N. MMr7l♦ �1 11 �M 1� 8 'So 2. 5 r ,�: �•� '^ '!M /.lac ? �- 10 rid 1 z 9r 2 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N • r • NAPA WOODLYN AVENUE am — — W rl 11 VIT7T� ml do- GPM i ru t s s W 0 PLAZA 3000 r i 3 -- — d- — 20 + 1 W � W I M- a 28 2 7 all f 2d W 2 s 23 ac 24 1 2 4 e s ie 0 10.11,12,13 14M i1 rI' _ 1 ' {.YD IA STREET SITE PLAN 5 Attachmen+ 3 4 N M ul tri tio �er�fnr Minneapolis x.12. Distribution Center June 11, 1987 7400 West 27th St. P.O. Box 26347 Minneapolis, MN 55426 (612) 929 -1635 Tom Ekstrom City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Tom, enclosed you will find a letter from Arbuckle Construction on the subject of removal of the blue paint that was applied to the front of our Maplewood location. As you can see, the contractor is concerned about the end result being as contrasting as the current color scheme. We did not in the beginning knowingly paint the building without permission, as we had permission from the owner's agent and were not aware of restrictions by the city. As you know, we operate in the whole of Ramsey and Hennepin County, and have not run into regulations concerning our store. fronts before. Our concern at this point is twofold. One, if the resulting sandblasting leaves as large a contrast as the current color, we don't see where that will be a distinct improvement. Our other concern is that, at the original planning meeting, there was one committee member missing and the committee was tied two for, two against. After some deliberation, it was decided (primarily in the interest of being able to close the meeting that evening) "this is the type of decision the city council is there to answer" and then given a unanimous vote as to no, so as to pass onto the city council the decision. Tom, as you know, when we went before the city council there was also a member missing and at that time, the city council was split two for, two against. Therefore, because of the split decision at the city council, they reverted back to the original decision by the planning committee, which was not really a decision on the store front, but simply a decision to give city council the-opportunity to make that decision. 6 Attachment 4 "The Best and Getting Better" i June 11, 1987 Tom Ekstrom Page 2 I think you would find that Genuine Parts. Company NAPA is as interested in the community and the development of the community as an y business you might have. We came into the city of Maplewood because, not only was there a need and an opportunity for bus Ines s , but at the same time we felt your community would welcome a new business ess that met the demands of the community* We think our point was well stated in comparisons of other major business that have been brought into the community and their signage, and we would ask that we have the opportunity to, once again, talk with the cit y council members (we are in the process of contacting those members now) to possibly reconsider our original request. Your thoughts and ideas concerning the problems facing us would certainly be appreciated. Best regards, Jim fewell Local Division Manager JN/gm Enclosure CC: Fran Juker Charlotte Wasiluk. John Greavu Gary Bastian Norm Anderson 7 ARBUCKLE CONSTRUCTION INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 7808 WEST 99TH STREET BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55438 612 941-0136 Tom Ekstrom June 3, 1987 City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 RE NAPA Auto Parts Store 2025 Woodlyn Avenue Maplewood, 'MN Dear Mr. Ekstrom; We have been contacted b NAPA Auto Parts to assist them in the removal of the blue paint that was applied to the front of the above named store. In researching the methods of removal we have found no acceptable solution* Painting over the blue to match the existing block is impossible since the • g 1 asti n the building is of multicolored block. Sandblasting paint off is possible p but will take a layer of the block with it. It is questionable what the texture and color results might be. I am convinced that short of replacement of the block itself there is no way to bring the building back to it's original condition. • m not interested i n getting involved in a task I have informed NAPA that I a 9 that cannot bring the desired results. For more information please call me. Sincerely, James N. Arbuckle g Attachment 5 L. �i February 4, 1987 Hemmings "Home of fine sewing machines" 2019 Woodlynn Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 770 -4130 Robert and Marctne Hemming - Owners Thomas Ekst rand Ci of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Napa Application Mr. Ekst rand : My retail store is located next to the Napa store in the Plaza 300O.complex. It would ld be my opinion that the pa inting of the front of the bu i 1 d i ng i n uest i on is m objectionable and is a determent q m ost rment t o my business. Therefore, we would not be in favor of Napa bung allowed to have the blue paint on the outside of the building. g. • When we first moved into the complex back in October of 1984 we had inquired into having a different size of letters on the outside of the building n lus a different t placement. I was told by the staff of Maplewood that ' there were established rules on the complex that were drawn up at the time of the plans being approved. Fo r r my own protection, it should apply to all parties. Si r ly, Z / Robert J. Hemming Hemming Bernina ERNINA El Stepping into the Future with the Quality of the Past "quality sewing machines from a quality dealership" 9 f When rate Remy 1br an sus• VIKING Husqvarna Attachment 6 MEMO Action by co ncll TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Ted Leigh — 2594 English DATE: August 5, 1987 Endorsed Reieete Date T NTRnni 1rT T nni Mr. Leigh has requested to appear before the City Council to discuss a drainage problem on English Street South of County Road C. RAr.Kf-.Rnimin Several years ago English Street South of County Road C was constructed b y the City. Most of the street and adjacent property drains south to catch bas in a cul —de —sac. The catch basins drain into Gierton Pond. In front of Mr. Leigh's house the street grade changes to a flatter 9 rade. When the grade changes, flowing water slows down and material suspended in the water tends to settle out. For the last several years home construction in the area has res.uited in more than normal dirt on English St. This material is washed down the street and deposited in front of Mr. Leigh's property, ALTERNATIVES ( 1 ) Take no action, (2) Install an additional catch basin in front of Mr. Leigh's lot. (3) Change the street grade to a more uniform slope. nT'�rI Tnni Alternative #1 maintains the status quo. However, one condition will change rather dramatically in the near future. The last house upstream from Mr. Leigh w i l l be completed this year. Once a lawn is established, the exces— sive dirt on the street should be eliminated. When.the source of the dirt is removed, Mr. Le i g.h' s s i t u a t i o n wou l d be no different than Any where el y se in town where street grade changes exist. Alternative #2 would be a more positive step in eliminating the problem, An additional catch basin would remove the water from the street and allow it to flow through a pipe to the pond. Th alternative, however, i s q ui to costly and would require tearing up a permanent street in good condition. Alternati #3 is also a positive solution to the problem. It is extremel costly, however. In addition, other home in the area would be adversel affected due to changes in driveway grades. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that no action be taken on this item. AGE ITEM MEMO RAN DUM Acti by Council TO Mayor, Ci Council and City Manager Endorse - F - - - - -- - - -- Robert D. - - -Ode 9 ard, _Di rector_ of Parks & Re_ creatio- fie • M ode -fied SUBJECT: Trai and Development Funding for Geranium Park �ecte ,�__�.._ DATE: August 5, 1987 Date INTRODUCT The City has entered into an agreement with School District 622 to improve Geranium Park, including a trai through the park to Beaver Lake School in exchange for a water tower *s i to . It is req that the City Counc authorize the expenditure of $10,000 fro PAC neighborhood funds for excavation, trail and improvements to Geranium Park, n w nvnnnI IKIM In November of 1986 the City Council approved a joint powers agreement for recreational faci between . Independent School Di strict 622 and the City. Westwood Pl anning and Engineering Company was hired as a consultant to work with both the Schoo Di and the City i the design of a park and l a round facility with special emphasi on trails. The purpose of p J!9 the trai was to provide suitable walking s for elementary students to Beaver Lake School and. wi l l eliminate the cost of busing for ol der .children. The-plan has been reviewed and approved by the Park and Recreation Commission. RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the City Council approve the expendi of $10,000 for excavation, trail and improvements to Geranium Park. Funds are authorized from the neighborhood PAC account. RDO:1 rS) 4.. Rules of Procedures A. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 87 - 1 - 18 RULES OF PROCEDURE Section 1 MEETINGS Regular: Action by Council:j Endorsed,,.. Modif Re ected,_... Date The Cit Council shall hold re meetin on the second and fourth Monda of each month at 7:00 P.M., provided that when the da fixed for an re meetin falls on a da desi b law as a le holida such meetin shall be held at the same hour on the next succeedin Thursda not a holida Special. The Ma or an two members of the Council b writin filed with the Cit Clerk at least twent hours before su meetin ma call a special meetin Notice of such meetin shall state the purpose or purposes thereof and shall be personall delivered to each member or'be left at the members usual place of residen with a person of suitable a and discretion then residin therein., or written notice thereof shall be left in-a conspicuous place at the residence if no such person can be found there. The notice shall be delivered twelve hours before the meetin time. Except for trivial matters, business transacted at a special meetin shall be limited to that mentioned in the call. Emer meetin ma be called at an time providin all members of the Council si waivers of notice to such meetin and said waivers shall be filed with the Cit Clerk. ' Place.: All meetin shall be held in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Buildin unless there is a published noti desi another location. Presiding Officers: The Ma shall preside at all meetin of the Council. In the absence of the Ma the Actin Ma shall preside. In the absence of both, the Councilmembers shall elect one of their number as temporar chairman. Quorum: Three members of the Council sh con a q uorum at an y meetin of the Council, but a smaller number ma ad from time to time, Order of Business: .At the hour appointed for meeting, the members shall be called to order by the Mayor, or in his absence by the Acting Mayor, or in the absence of both, by the Clerk. The Clerk shall call the roll, note the absentees and announce whether a quorum is present. In the absence of the Clerk, the Mayor shall appoint a secretary P P rotem. Upon the appearance of the quorum, the Council shall pro- ceed to business which shall be conducted in the following order: A. Call to order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes D. Approval of Agenda E. Consent Agenda F. Public Hearings G. Award of Bids H. Unfinished Business I. New Business J. Visitor Presentations K. Council Presentations L. Administrative Presentations M. Adjournment Curfew: No additional agenda item will be discussed after 10:30 P.M. No discussion will continue past 11:00 P.M. Meetings adjourned under this policy will be continued to the next Thursday at 7:00 P.M. The continued meeting will start at the point on the agenda where the adjournment occurred: No new items will. be added to the con- tinued. meeting -agenda. First Regular: At the first regular Council meeting in January of each year, the Council shall (1) designate the official newspaper, (2) choose an Acting Mayor from the membership of the Council who shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the disability or absence of the Mayor, and (3) review the Rules of Procedure of the City Council and make any necessary changes if such changes are desired. Section 2. A f:FNT) A FOP REGULAR MEETING (1) All matters to be submitted to the Council shall be filed. not later than 12:00 Noon on the Monday prior to the Monday Council meeting at which con - sideration is desired, and shall be delivered to the City Manager, or in his absence, the City Clerk. In unusual circumstances and when the matter -- does not require investigation, an item may be accepted after the deadline upon the approval of the City Manager. (2) Except for trivial matters, no item or business shall be considered for action by the Council which does not appear on the agenda for the meet - ing, except that an item or urgent business which requires immediate action and is so determined by'a majority of the Council may be considered by the Council whether or not there is a full membership present. The Council will hear all reasonable citizen petitions, requests and statements how - ever, suoh items which do not specifically appear on the agenda shall be deferred to a future meeting for more careful consideration and study if Council action other than filing, is required requested. SW 9 1. 1/26 The Mayor and each Councilmember shall be provided with a copy of the agenda, minutes of the previous meeting, and any other reports and in- formation pertinent to the agenda at least seventy -two hours prior to each regular Council meeting. _ No matter may be submitted for Council action by any administrative official, department head, or employee unless it has first been pre- sented to the City Manager for,inclusion on the agenda. Section 3. LIMITATION ON COUNCIL ACTION The Council shall only take action at regularly scheduled meetings, or special meetings, called pursuant to section 1, unless all Council mem- bers are present at the time the action is taken. Regular meetings do not include meetings with public bodies in joint or cooperative sessions. All Council actions shall conform to the requirements of the open meeting law. Section 4. MINUTES (a) The City Clerk shall keep a record of all Council meetings. (b) Unless a reading of the minutes of a Council meeting is requested by a member of the Council, such minutes maybe. approved without reading if each member has previously been provided a copy. (c) The Council may, by motion carried by a majority vote, amend the minutes. Such amending motion shall become a.-part of the minutes of the subsequent meeting. Section 5. . DUTIES OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER: The presiding officer shall preserve strict order and decorum at all meetings of the Council. He shall state every question coming before the Council, announce the decision of the Council on all subjects, and decide all questions or order,subject, however, to an appeal to the Council in which event a majority vote of the Council shall govern and conclusively determine such questions or order. He shall vote on all questions and on a roll call vote rotate the order in which votes are cast . Section 6. RULES OF DEBATE: (a) The Mayor or other Presiding Officer may move second and debate from the their, subject only to such limitations of debate as are by - 10 1/26 the rules imposed on all members and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges of a Councilmember by reason of his acting as the Presiding Officer. (b) Every member desiring to speak shall address the chair, and upon recognition by the Presiding Officer shall confine himself to the question under debate avoiding all personalities and indecorous language. _ (c) A member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it be to call him to order or to vote on a motion to close a debate, or as herein otherwise provided. If a member, while speaking, be called to order, he shall cease speaking until the question of order is determined and if in order, he shall be per - mitted to proceed. (d) A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Council must be made at the meeting at which such action was taken or at the next regular meeting of the Council and must be made by a member of the Council who voted with the prevailing side, provided that if such motion to reconsider is passed,then the parties entitled to notice on the action shall be notified, and the reconsideration of the original action shall be taken at the next regular meeting following passage of the motion to reconsider. (e) A Councilmember may request,through the Presiding Officer, the privilege of having an abstract of his statement on any subject under consideration by the Council, or the reason for his dessent from or support of any action of the Council, entered in the minutes. (f) The Clerk shall enter in the minutes a synopsis of the discussion on any question coming in proper order before the Council. Section 7. ADDRFSSING THE COUNCIL: Any person desiring o address the Council first secure the per- g mission of the Presiding Officer* Each person addressing the Council shall give his name and address in an audible tone for the records, and unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer, shall limit his address to five minutes, except at a public hearing when the limit shall be ten minutes. All remarks should be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any member. No person other than the Council and the person - having the floor, shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Council, without the permission of the-Presiding Officer. No question shall be asked a Councilmember or any member of the Administrative Staff except through the. Presiding Officer. - 11 - 1/26 Section 8. GENERAL RULES OF ORDER: Robert's Rules of Order and Robert's Parliamentary Law shall be accepted as an authority on parliamentary practice on matters not specificall y covered and in case of a conflict these rules shall govern. Section 9. DECORUM AND ITS ENF ORCEMENT: The Council members, while the Council is in session, must preserve order and decorum, and a member shall neither, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the peace of the Council, nor disturb any member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Council or its Presiding Officer, except as otherwise herein provided. No smoking shall be permitted in the Council Chamber while the Council is in .session. Sec tion 10. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, MOTIONS AND REPORTS: (a) Ordinances, resolutions, and other matters or subjects requiring action by the Council shall be introduced and sponsored by a mem- ber of the Council except that the City Manager or Attorney m Y present ordinances, resolutions and other matters or subjects to the Council. (b) Every ordinance and resolution shall be presented in writing and read in full at a Council meeting; provided, however, that the reading of an ordinance or resolution may be dispensed with by unanimous consent. Upon the vote on ordiinances, resolidtiomns sand motions, the ayes and nays shall be recorded. The vote shall be by roll call of all members of the Council as provided under DUTIES OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER in this resolution. A majority vote of all members of the Council shall be required for the passage of all ordinances, motions and resolutions except as otherwise pro - vided by law and except that amendments to the comprehensive plan shall requre at least four votes in favor. (c) Every ordinance other than emergency ordinances shall have two public readings as provided in Subsection (b) of the Section, and at least fourteen days shall elapse between the first reading or waiver thereof and the second reading or waiver thereof. (d) An emergency ordinance is an ordinance necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, morals, safety or wel- fare in which the emergency is defined _and declared, passed by a roll call vote of at least four members of the Council, as recorded by ayes and nays. No.prosecution shall be based upon the provisions of any emergency ordinance until the same has been filed with the - 12 - 1/26 City Clerk and posted in three conspicuous places in the City and twenty -four hours after such filing and posting shall have elapsed or until the ordinance has been published, unless the person, per- sons, firms or corporations charged with violations thereof shall have had notice of the passage thereof prior to the act or omission complained of. Section 11. CONDUCT OF CITY EMPLOYEES: (a) The City Manager may take part in the discussions of the City Council and may recommend to the Council such measures as he may deem necessary for the welfare of the people and efficient adminis- tration of the affairs of the City. He shall have all the rights powers and duties prescribed by Minnesota Statutes in regard thereof; however, it is recognized that the City Council is the policy making body for the City and the City Manager shall confine his discussion at Council meetings to.statements of fact, recommendations based on his knowledge and experience and explanations of the reasons for the same, and any matters pertaining to administration. (b) No City employee, other than the City Manager or Attorney, shall __enter into discussions of the City Council except to answer ques- tions directed to such employee, or to present factual information. (c) The above regulations of City employees shall not be construed to limit the appearance before the City Council of any City employee when such appearance is made as a taxpayer or member of the public for or against some particular issue under discussion by the Council when such employee has an interest in the outcome thereof. WAIVER: By 4/5 consent of all Councilmembers, these rules may be waived. Section 13. A T1 TnT VD MMPMIr • A motion to adjourn shall always be in order and decided without debate. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.