HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987 05-21 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7 :00 P.M., Thursday, May 21, 1987
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 87 - 11
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
(C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting No. 87 - 9 (April 27, 1987)
(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
(E) CONSENT AGENDA
a
1. .Accounts Payable
2. Extension - Beaver Creek Revenue bonds
(F) PUBLkIC HEARINGS
1. 7 :00 P.M., District 8 water Tank - Project 86 -15
2. 7 :10 P.M., Off -Sale Liquor License - 1347 Frost Avenue - Thomas Hopkins
�G) AWARD OF BIDS
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
I. Waive Escrow Requirement - Meyer Street Water Main (Bush to Minnehaha)
Project 87 -13
2. Developer Project Financing and Construction Report
(I) NEW BUSINESS
1. Billboard Lease Renewal
2. HRA Annual Report
3. Planning Commission Annual Report
4. Metropolitan Council Survey
5. Noise Ordinance
6. Travel and Training Reimbursement Policy
(J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
(k) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
(M) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, April 27, 1987
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 87 -9
. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present
Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting No. 87 -6 (March 23, 1987)
Councilmember Bastian moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 87 -6 March
23. 1987) be aooroved as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
1. Recycling
2. Dirt Track - Motorcycling
3. Add Item I -9 - Castle Ridge Addition - Plat
4. Court Consolidation
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Council removed Items E -3 and 4 to become Items I -10 and 11
Councilmember Bastian moved, seconded by Councilmember Juker. Aves - all. to
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts, Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses, Check Register
dated April 14, 1987 through April 20, 1987 - $582,093.39 Part II,
Payroll dated April 17, 1987, gross amount $142,912.96) as recommended.
4/27
2. Plan Approval - Bid Authorization - Beam Avenue Water Main - Project 84 -12
Resolution No. 87 - 4 - 69
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on
March 9,1987, plans and specifications for the installation of a trunk
water main along Beam Avenue from the railroad bridge to approximately
1,300 feet west of T.H. 61, Project 84 -12, have been prepared by (or
under the direction of) the City Engineer, who has presented such plans
and specifications to the Council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered
placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved
plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published
twice, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be pub-
licly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 A.M., on the
28th day of May, 1987, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be
considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied
by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maple-
wood, Minnesota, for 59 of the amount of such bid.
3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and in-
structed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the
time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received.
The Council will consider the bids at the regular City Council
Meeting of June 8, 1987.
3. Investment Agreement
Discussed as Item I -10.
4. Financing for Project 86 -04
Discussed as Item 1 -11.
5. Financial Transfer to Close Project 84 -10.
Council authorized a transfer of $40,071.52 from the General Fund to the
Construction Fund for Project 84 -10 (Conner Avenue).
6. Resolution Reaffirming - Beaver Creek Apartments - Revenue Bonds
- 2 - 4/27
Resolution No. 87 - 4 - 70
RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING AUTHORIZATION OF A PROJECT AND
HOUSING PROGRAM UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C (MUNICIPAL HOUSING PROGRAMS)
AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGEE REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND
BONDS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED TO FINANCE
THE PROJECT AND PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as
follows:
1. The Council has previously received a proposal from Beaver Creek
Apartments Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the "Com-
pany") that the City undertake to finance a certain Project and multifamily
rental housing program for such Project as herein described, pursuant to
Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes (the "Act ") and on December 27, 1985
authorized such project and program and issued its $8,500,000 Variable Rate
Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Beaver Creek
Apartments Limited Partnership Project) (the "1985 Bonds "), to finance such
Project. The Project consists of the acquisition and construction of a multi-
family rental facility containing 180 units and related improvements including
parking facilities in the City.
2. The Company now desires to refund the 1985 Bonds through the issuance
by the City of its $8,500,000 Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 1987 (Beaver Creek Apartments Project). The Project as described above
will facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; en-
courage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within
the boundaries of the City; and will otherwise further the policies and purposes
of the Act; and the findings made in the Preliminary Resolution adopted by this
Council on February 11, 1985 with respect to the Project and in the final author-
izing resolution for the 1985 Bonds on December 23, 1985 are hereby ratified,
affirmed and approved.
3. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of May 1,
1987, between the City as Lender and the Company as Borrower (the "Loan Agree-
ment"), the City loan the proceeds of the bonds to the Company to refund the
1985 Bonds. The Basic Payments to be made by the Company under the Loan Agree-
ment are fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of,
premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed
that the City assign its rights to the Basic Payments and certain other rights
under the Loan Agreement to First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul, Minnesota
(the "Trustee ") as security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of
Trust dated as of May 1, 1987 (the "Indenture ") between the City and the
Trustee. The acquisition, construction, operation and occupancy of the
Project will conform to the terms and conditions of a Regulatory Agreement
(the "Regulatory Agreement ") dated as of May 1, 1987, between the City, the
Company and the Trustee and a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated as
of December 1, 1985 and amended as of May 1, 1987 (the "Declaration "), both
executed by the Company and to be recorded as a covenant and restriction run-
ning with the land on which the Project is located.
- 3 - 4/27
4. This Council, by action taken on February 11, 1985, and after a public
hearing thereon, adopted a resolution giving preliminary approval to a proposal
to finance a project substantially the same as the Project; and on or about
December 19, 1985, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency gave approval to the
proposed financing program for the Project. This Council, by action taken on
December 23, 1985, adopted a resolution authorizing the Project and the issuance
of the 1985 Bonds.
5. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds, forms of the following
documents have been submitted to the Council for approval:
a. The Loan Agreement.
b. The Indenture.
c. The Regulatory Agreement.
d. The Declaration (not executed by the City).
6. It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
a. The Project described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred
to above constitutes a Project authorized by the Act and the finan-
cing program for the Project is authorized by the Act;
b. The purpose of the Project and the program for the Project is, and
the effect thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by the
acquisition, construction and equipping of rental housing facilities
for assisting persons of low and moderate income within the City to
obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they can afford;
c. The acquisition, construction and installation of the Project, the
issuance and sale of the Bonds, the execution and delivery by the
City of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agree-
ment and the Regulatory Agreement (collectively the "Agreements "),
and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City
contained in the Agreements, and of all other acts and things re-
quired under the constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota
and City Charter to make the Agreements valid and binding obliga-
tions of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized
by the Act;
d. It is desirable that the Company be authorized, in accordance with
the provisions of the Act and subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement and Declara-
tion, which terms and conditions the City determines to be neces-
sary, desirable and proper, to acquire and install the Project by
such means as shall be available to the Company and in the manner
determined by the Company, subject to the terms of the aforesaid
agreements;
e. It is desirable that the bonds be issued by the City upon the terms
set forth in the Indenture;
- 4 - 4/27
f. the Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to
produce revenue sufficient to provide for the prompt payment
of principal of, premium, if any, interest on, and the pur-
chase price of, the bonds issued under the Indenture when
due, and the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory Agree-
ment also provide that the Company is required to pay all expenses
of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but
without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance
against all liability for injury to persons or property arising
from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assess-
ments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises and
payable during the term of the Loan Agreement, Indenture and
Regulatory Agreement;
g. As provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not
to be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the revenues
pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any lia-
bility thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the right to
compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of
the Bonds or the interest or premium, if any thereoq,or the purchase
price thereof, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of
the City except the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which
have been assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds
shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable,
upon any property of the City except the interests of the City in the
Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under the
Indenture; the bonds shall recite that the Bonds are issued without
moral obligation on the part of the state or its political subdivi-
sions, and that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable
solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof and that the
Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of
any constitutional or statutory limitation; and
h. A public hearing on the Project was duly held by the City Council on
February 11, 1985.
6. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the provisions of
Section 9 of this Resolution, the forms of the Agreements and exhibits thereto
are approved substantially in the form submitted and on file in the office of
the City Clerk. The Agreements, in substantially the form submitted, are directed
to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City
Clerk. Any other documents and certificates contemplated by the Agreements or
necessary to the transaction described above shall be executed by the appropriate
City officers. Copies of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein
described shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in said
Loan Agreement and Indenture.
7. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and
upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and this Resolution. The Bonds shall
mature and be subject to mandatory purchase as set forth in the Indenture. The
principal amount of the Bonds shall be determined by the Mayor, the City Clerk,
- 5 - 4/27
the Bond Purchaser and the Company, but not to exceed $8,500,000. The
rate of interest on the Bonds shall be such rate or rates as the Mayor,
the City Clerk, the Bond Purchaser and the Compnay shall agree to, but the
net interest cost shall not exceed 9.5% per annum.
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated, the original Bond Purchaser, shall
purchase the Bonds for an amount not less than 95% of the principal amount of
the Bonds and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into the Bond
Purchase Agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Mayor and City
Clerk are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as pre-
scribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication
and delivery to the Bond Purchaser.
8. The Mayor and City Clerk and other officers of the City are authorized
and directed to prepare and furnish to the Bond Purchaser certified copies of
all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other
affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to
the :.legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in
the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such
certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore fur-
nished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all
statements contained therein.
9. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above
includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and
appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions
thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the CityAttorney
and the City officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to
their execution; and said City Attorney and City officials are hereby author-
ized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any
instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein author-
ized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accor-
dance with the terms hereof.
In the absence (or inability) of the officials authorized herein to
execute any of the documents herein referred to, the documents may be exe-
cuted by any officer or member of the City acting in their behalf.
Passed: April 27, 1987.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
7. Budget Transfer
Approved a budget transfer of $1150.00 from the contingency account to
cover the cost of the appraisal completed by John Kenna in regards to
the property described as 09- 29- 22 -13- 0007 -1, 2441 Maplewood Drive.
- 6 - 4/27
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M., Miggler Rezoning : 2444 Maplewood Drive (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
proposal to move the CO, commercial office /M -1, light manufacturing zoning
district boundary to line up with the east or west property line of Lot
Two, Block Two, in the proposed Miggler Addition.
b. Associate City Planner-Randy Johnson presented the.Staff report.
C. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommenda-
tion.
d. Mr. Bill Chapman, Consultant for the Migglers spoke on behalf of the
Miggler's request.
e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against
the proposal. The following were heard:
Mr. Gale Rehnberg, Rehnberg E.R.A. Realty
Mr. John Winston, Winston and Bernett
Mr. George Rossbach, 1406 E. County Road C
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -4 -71
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from CO, commer-
cial office, to M -1, light manufacturing, for the following- described
property:
The easterly portions of Lot Two, Block One, and Lot One, Block
Two, Miggler's Addition (as revised by the City Council on April
27, 1987).
This property was known as 2444 Highway 61, Maplewood, prior to
platting as the Miggler Addition.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII
of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood:Planning Commission
on March 2, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 27,
1987, to consider this rezoning. Notice there, was published
- 7 - 4/27
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing
were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state-
ments. The council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of
the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to
the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveni-
ences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services
and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire
protection and schools.
5. The area does not need to be zoned for CO use to protect the
surrounding property from incompatible uses.
6. The Planning Commission had previously recommended the entire
Migler site for M -1 Zoning.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
2. 7:10 P.M., Code Amendment - Temporary Signs - Second Reading (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
the proposed ordinance regulating banners and streamers.
b. Associate City Planner Johnson presented the Staff report.
c. Councilmember Juker moved second reading of an ordinance regulating
the use of banners and streamers.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian,
Juker and Wasiluk
Nay - Mayor Greavu
d. Mayor Greavu at this time allowed audience participation.
e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
- 8 - 4/27
f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Bob Duncan, Topper World
Mr. John Schmelz, Countryside Volkswagen
Mr. M. Morgan, 35 Sterling
Mr. Ronald Haven, Signworks
Mr. Duane Hejny, Hejny Rentals
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Anderson moved to rescind the previous motion.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
i. Councilmember Bastian move to table the matter and to reauest Staff
using such si
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
3. 7:20 P.M., Upper Afton, McKnight Road to Century, Project 86 -07 (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
proposal to reconstruct Upper Afton Road from Century Avenue to McKnight
Road.
b. Acting City Engineer Chuck Ahl presented the Staff report.
c. Mr. John Davidson, Consultant for Toltz, King, Duvall and Anderson,
presented the specifics of the proposal.
d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or agaisnt
the proposal. The following expressed their concerns:
James and Jacquelyn Sullivan, 2647 Upper Afton Road
Ronald Haven, 2663 Upper Afton Road
Donald St. Germain, 2555 Upper Afton Road
Edward Erickson, 41 Ferndale
Rita Brenner, 2673 Upper Afton Road
Gerald Smith, 48 No. Ferndale
Wayne Pislulka, 2567 Upper Afton Road
Vern Fischler, 2689 Upper Afton Road
Ed Vitak, 2587 Upper Afton Road
Judy Smith, 48 No. Ferndale
James Swedenburg, 2511 Upper Afton Road
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the Upper Afton Road reconstruction
Project 86 -07.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
- 9 - 4/27
Acting Mayor Wasiluk called a five minute recess at 9:50 P.M.
Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 9:55 P.M.
4. 7:30 P.M., P.U.D. Revision, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
request of Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., to revise the conditional use permit
for Cave's Century Fifth Addition preliminary plat to substitute 20 double
dwelling units for 32 town house units; and to rezone the site from F,
farm residence to R -1, single family.
b. Associate City Planner Johnson presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
87 -4 -72
WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., initiated a conditional use permit
to revise the Cave's Century planned unit development at the following —
described property: That part of the East 420.00 feet lying northerly of
the South 795.87 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 22 West of the 4th Principal
Meridian, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Ed Cave and Sons,
Inc., pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood
Planning Commission on April 6, 1987. The Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 27,
1987. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law.
All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity
to be heard and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above — described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of
the following findings —of —fact:
— 10 — 4/27
1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises,
glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run —off,
vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access
or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area proper—
ties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as
streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the,site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
10. The use would cause - minimal adverse.environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan, dated February 6, 1987, unless a
change is approved by the City.
2. The footings for each double — dwelling structure shall be pinned
by a registered land surveyor prior to pouring the foundation
to insure that each party wall will be constructed exactly on the
common lot lines.
3. Deed restrictions shall be recorded against the title of each lot
before issuance of a building permit or a homeowners' association
agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Cave's Century
Fifth Addition plat to include, but not be limited to, the following
requirements:
a. Each double — dwelling structure shall have a uniform exterior
appearance in terms of color, design and maintenance.
— 11 — 4/27
b. If one unit is burned or destroyed, it shall be reconstructed
in a uniform appearnace, and if both units are burned or de-
stroyed, minimum lot widths shall then prevail for a single -
dwelling home. A double dwelling may be rebuilt meeting the
original conditions of this section.
c. Any disputes shall be submitted to binding arbitration according
to the rules of the Minnesota Arbitration Association.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
g. Mayor Greavu moved approval of the revised preliminary plat for Cave's
Century Fifth Addition (plans stamped 2- 6 -87), subject to the following
conditions being met prior to final plat approval:
1. Final approval of drainage, utility and grading plans by the
City Engineer.
2. Submittal of a developer's agreement, with required surety, for
the required public improvements.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
h. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution--and--moved its
adoption:
87 -4 -73
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm
residence, to R- 2, double dwelling, for the following - described property:
That part of the East 420.00 feet lying notherly of the South 795.87 feet
of the southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township
29 North, Range 22 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII
of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
on April 6, 1987. The Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 27,
1987, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing
were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City
Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
- 12 - 4/27
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of
the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to
the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately
safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveni-
ences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. This rezoning would eliminate the possibility of any future nuisance
complaints associated with uses permitted in a farm zone, such as
the raising of livestock.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
5. Code amendment : Smaller Single Dwelling Lots - First Reading
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
the proposed code amendment to the subdivision ordinance to establish
the minimum lot widths for smaller single dwelling lots that were pre-
viously adopted in the zoning ordinance, 60 feet for interior lots and
85 feet for corner lots.
b. Associate City Planner Johnson presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recom-
mendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Gary Hook, 2146 Lydia
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of
er
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Bastian and Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and
Juker
- 13 - 4/27
5A. 7:40 P.M., Rezoning and Preliminary Plat - Lynnwood Terrace (4 Votes for
Rezoning Only)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
request of Gerald Mogren and Richard Schreier to rezone property located
on Lydia Avenue, East of Ariel Street from F, farm residence, to R -2
double dwelling and for approval-of a preliminary plat to create fifteen
small lot single dwelling properties.
b. Associate Planner Johnson presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recom-
mendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
Gerald Mogren, the applicant
Letter from S.B.F. Management, Inc. (Maplewood Plaza 3000 Shopping
Center)
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Gary Hook, 2146 Lydia
Mrs. Susanne Hoyt, 2993 Furness
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until the meetin
May 11, 1987, for further informati regarding drainage, etc.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Hillwood Drive (Crestview to Marnie) Project 85 -05.
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
87 -4 -74
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the
bid of Danner, Inc., in the amount of $100,961.85 is the lowest responsi-
ble bid for the construction of Hillwood Drive from Crestview Drive to
Marnie Street, City Project 86 -05, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and
on behalf of the City.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
2. Lease Purchase Financing for Computer System.
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
- 14 - 4/27
b. Councilmember Anderson moved
financing of the new computer sys
Seconded by Councilmember Juker.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
for
Ayes — all.
1. Code Amendment ; Freestanding Signs in LBC and CO Zones (2nd Reading —
4 Votes)
a. Discussed later on the Agenda
2. Code Amendment - : Exterior Siding (2nd Reading)
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 603
AN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE COMPLETION OF THE
EXTERIOR FINISH OF RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 9 -7 is added as follows:
"Section 9 -7. Exterior completion: The exterior finish -'on -all..
residential dwellings and their accessory buildings shall be completed
within six months of the date the permit is issued: Refinishing of
existing buildings shall be completed within six months of the start
of the work. Any owner of a dwelling that does not comply with this code,
at time of the code's passage, shall have six months from date of written
notification of such to bring the dwelling into compliance. Tar paper,
unfinished plywood, fiberboard insulation, foam insulation, brown coat or
scratch coat of stucco, plastic sheeting and other similar materials not
designed to be an exterior finish shall not be considered an acceptable
exterior finish. The building official may grant a 90 —day extension if
there is an unusual hardship, such as bad weather. Further extensions
must be approved by the City Council."
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and
publication.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council
this 27th day of April, 1987.
Attest:
City Clerk
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
Mayor
Ayes — 5
Nays — 0
Ayes — all
— 15 —
4/27
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Paratransit
a. Councilmember Wasiluk updated the Council regarding paratransit.
b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved the following:
1. Authorize staff to enter into the attached joint powers agreement
with North St. Paul and Oakdale to study the feasibility of de-
veloping a paratransit system.
2. Approve a budget transfer of $600 from the contingency account to
have a grant application prepared.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker.
2. Order Public Hearing Water District 8 Improvements - Project 86 -15
a.. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
87 -4 -75
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been
authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the
improvement of Water Service District No. 8 and Sterling Street from
Mailand Road to Highwood Avenue, City Project 86 -15, by construction
of trunk water main, water tower, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
street, and
WHEREAS, the said City Engineer is preparing the aforesaid report
for the improvement herein described; and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid report will be presented to the Council for
review on May 11, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The report of the City engineer advising this Council that
the proposed improvement on Water Service District No. 8 and
Sterling Street from Mailand Road to Highwood Avenue, City Project
86 -15, by construction of trunk water main, water tower, sanitary
sewer, storm sewer and street shall be presented to this Council
for review at the regular meeting of May 11, 1987.
2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance
with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all
or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A.
Chapter 429.
- 16 - 4/27
3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Thursday, the 21st day
of May, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. to consider said improvement. The
City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing
and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all.
3. Public Improvement Petition — Meyer Street Water Main (Bush to Minnehaha)
Project 87 -13.
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -4 -76
WHEREAS, a petiton has been received to construct a water main on
Meyer Street between Bush and Minnehaha Avenues, City Project 87 -13, and -
to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer
for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council
with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary
way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as
to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the im—
provement as recommended.
2. That this study shall not begin until the petitioner establishes
with the City a cash escrow in the amount of $6,000.00. This
cash escrow shall guarantee the payment of the feasibility study
preparation costs with payment to be made only if the project is
not ordered and is equal to 150% of the estimated preparation
cost. The cash escrow shall be either a letter of credit or a
certified check.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — all.
4. Developer Project Financing and Construction Report.
a. Councilmember Juker moved to table until May 11, 1987.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes — all.
5. 1986 Annual Financial Report and Audit
a. Council to meet with auditors at 6:00 P.M., May 11, 1987 to discuss
report.
— 17 — 4/27
6. Council Approval : Hire Permanent Part -Time Clerk Typist (Fill a Vacancy)
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to authorize Staff to post the Clerk - Typist
position for the Nature Center and approve the hiring of a new permanent
part -time Clerk Typist.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker
7. No Parking - Castle Avenue
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -4 -77
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL that a
"No Parking Zone" be establsihed on the east and south side of Castle
Avenue south of T.H. 36 from Sherren Avenue to approximately 700 feet
north and east.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian and Juker
Nay - Councilmember Wasiluk
8. Budget Transfer - Educational Incentive Pay
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve a budget transfer o
General Fund, Contingency Account to the appropriate
fund the five police officers for educational incenti
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
9. Castle Ridge - 1st and 2nd Addition - Final Plat
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Castle Ridge First Addition Final Plat and
the Castle Ridge Second Addition as recommended.
Seconded by.CouncilmembQr Jukezi, Ayes - all.
10. Investment Agreement
a. Councilmember Anderson authorized the execution of the submitted in-
vestment agreement with E. F. Hutton & Company and that the Bank of New
England be designated as an official City depository for transactions and
deposits with E. F. Hutton & Company.
- 18 - 4/27
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued)
1. Code Amendment : Freestanding Signs in LBC and CO Zones (2nd Reading -
4 Votes) (Continued)
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Bastian moved second reading of an ordinance increas
the size of free - standing pylon signs in LBD and CO zoned districts.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Bastian and Wasiluk
Nays - Councilmembers Anderson and Juker
Motion defeated.
1 . NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
11. Financing for Project 86 -04.
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to authorize a transf
Seconded by Mayor Greavu.
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker
J. VISITOR PRESENTATION
None.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Recycling
a. Councilmember Wasiluk stated there will be a meeting with the recycling
committee and the area rubbish haulers at 7:00 P.M. on May 5, 1987, in the
Council Chambers.
2. Dirt Bike Path
Councilmember Bastian instructed Staff to investigate the dirt bike path at
Woodlyn and Abel. The constant use by motorized bikes, etc., is causing
dust, dirt and noise problems.
L. ADMINISTRATIBVE PRESENTATION
1. Court Consolidation
- 19 - 4/27
a. Acting Manager Haider stated the
into two suburban courts has passed,
committee.
ADJOURNMENT
11:27 P.M.
bill concerning court consolidation
and now will proceed to conference
City Clerk
— 20 — 4/27
Action by, Council l
Endorsed.
Mod.if i ed,�.�__,__,
�' T .�
MANUAL
CHECKS DATED
THRU MAY 11 -19 8 7
Rej t
. . . . . .
. �
D to
1 987 CITY
OF MAPLEWOoD
CHECK
NO .. DATE
CHECK
REGISTER
__ _
_ AMOUNT'
_ VENDOR
# 21830
05/12/87
_
k .....__...__._ ...._...ITEM DESCRIPTION
2I530
121
_ .....05f 13/$ . _..._...
a 5/12/87
195.77
_._. j • 0 12-46-,
BLUE CROSS
SLl3
_ E CROSS
INSURANCE
#2 #B0
05/ # 2/87
1,192
BLUE CROSS
�.:.._ _.__..... I NSURANCE - ......__-
1X1830
05/1 2 /8T
# • # 2' 20
BLUE CROSS
_._....
INSURANCE
121 B30
_
OS /� 2/87
Gee . 38
BLUE CROSS
INSURANCE
#2#830
05/ # 287
3, 784.74
BLUE CROSS
- _...... _ . INSURANCE ._ -.
. 097.2?
BLUE. CROSS
INSURANCE
7jS7e. 10
INSURANCE
# �y ^^ 6
G #i0�8
121G78
05/#2/87
OS/12/87
#,#se.94
CROUP HEALTH
5, 545.96
GROUP HEALTH
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
1 21 MS 9
# c # N59
051 C /8T
05 12/8?
10, 63C . 85
_
MIND STATE TREAS
, .
_._.. _..1.._21 _ . _
MS 9
. . 05/1
-_ 2/8 _
9.35 #.25
42600
MINN STATE TREAS
LICENSE
LICENSE
121M69
OS/12/8?
_..._.__ _. .
3f 3.00
MINN STATE TREAS
.. LICENSE
204723.10 *
MINN STATE TREAS
_
LICENSE
# 2# NSO.
� 2# N80
.. ..
OS/ # 2/87
OS/ #2'/87
......... .. .... _.. 6 9. 1 7
NSP _
# 2 i N80
05/12/87
95.2$
Ill-68
_
NSP
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
_.._... _ ._
27b. #3
NSP
UTILITIES
#C#P95
121P95
OSf 12/87
OS/12/87
8.248. b3
P . E . R . A
�..
10, 953.85.
P ' E ' R ' A
PERA pBL
_. 1 9. 199. 89
PERA PBL
121 Sea
05/14 /87
#35/12/87
SHARE
11 Se8
a5/12/87
370.42
C , 763.30
SHARE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
3s306-60 *
_ _
SHARE __.
INSURANCE
24AOS
OS/12/87
436.90
AFSCME
UNION DUES
4
124C14
OS/12/87 _
05/12/87
988.96
7S1.
-
ROLL ANN R _...._ ._......__.__�.__.
CAR
_.__.__.__ _.._ _ :....__ _ _ ..._ ..._
CONTRACT PYMt
__ _... _ .. _.
1
_ 740. 9 1
CARROLL ANN R
CONTRACT PYM
* * * * **
� -.. _
51v .y�.,f ,3N N S '� S 'Y'`r✓^yh. _'S *�,C'_: rn_•f?z�{K45,,,�,wy Ry�"�Y a
Y'
'.3 F ,h.;v "',.:_'.
•- .
G
} 4 ,.' n.tlk 7.,. , �„ ,:.,.�?��� _:'`' �,. v' 7 '�:�•.t,,,at,��,"= ',�c..�r,_� _..,,.r....
`k b •.'C x•:7.95 . •.1,
... -fir':
. :c ..
v: -i .Y . e Y 1 .:.:.1... `
;,. -..
r { {1v7tt✓< ;i.
fl.: :(. . :S , H.j 'S• rg,+i'�!`'s f l+..kYS v' :' ..
°•, 1. -� ,:,,. e.a �'•: '..;, -... -. ..:•. ", � -�' �',•�. _'
v 4'
r.. ..e ...a. ... ,� fix .. ... .. .... ...:.:. .. ...' ,.... ..... ... ,,,.. ': -., :�
A,:.>..a c R :rev. • k :
..
t
,:::
..� f
:<s
,.r ,,'�+ y. a ... -.,s. ; «.x, ++.:,� .....rig:. ..,, . . , .... •...
J
...:: ..:.: � �,'...•- __... - �. -:..
-
:..Y . rs¢,
Ir
i
1'387 CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD
3
CHECK
REGI STER
__:... CHECK ND ..DATE :.
AMOUNT.
_
.......
3
-
, ....__. _.... ._� . _.
.... Eli... �
124C3.5..... . ..::w_ 05/12/87__ _....
_._.:_. :_ . 2 #., 054.51k
CTY_ CNTY`.: CRED UNION,
21, os0 . s0
_,�
alft
124LQ4 OS/12/87
#40 .803.23
Ld8 REHBEIN INC
CONTRA
124M1S 05/12/87
# 24M 15 85/ 12/87
S, 27 S . SS
_
MAPLEWD STATE BNK
FUT PIE,
_.: 24M 15 45 12/87
17, 71 4.47
MAPLEWD T
S ATE BNK
FWT PBE.
_.. _ _
# 24M 15 OS/12/87
_. _.. -.._. , 287. SO _ _. _
5, 275. SS
_ . MAPLEWD STATE BNK
_,.. SAil.I1lCg B
MAPLEWD STATE BANK
F PBl
2$ SS3.07 * T
METRB SUPERVISORY,.....-.__..,..
:.MEMBERSHIP!
18.00
124161 45 12187
OS/f2/87
448.15
MN MUTUAL LIFE INS
INSURANCE
.
13.85. , _ _ . _
:._ MN MUTUAL_ LIFE INS
INSURANCE
460. 00
124M65 05112187
8,445.55
MN ST COMM/REVENUE E
CWT PBL
_..., _
8.4'09.59
124168 45/12187
#24168 05112187
110.84
MN ST RETIREMENT
INSURANCE
46,16
MN ST RETIREMENT
INSURANCE
157.00
1241 75 05112187
746. ?5
MN TEAMSTERS
UNION DUES
706.75
124N14 _ 45/12!87
29.75
NELSON. CAROL_ M_ _ ..,
REFUND ..__.
29.75
.
1 25168 45112/87
160.40
8REN2 MARIE
SUPPLIES
160. 00
125169 45112187
455.00
KNOWLAN SCOTT/JUDY
Y
CONTRACT YM
,
/ �.-, `�'3� �'P`h'�YX!"`rR�c»q�ie;ecl •'�f�$.•rF �'Nr�..(�'IT.�# �s'r l�q�* *�YS �' r�i �. 'e'
n
'.
�`.x1:^`Aet�Sx.Y5�ir:
�•Q$,h p.lwr. K
-
'
Ty 7.. .'qt.t.. ;�TA�.S' a(g f2 �y�� ��';�r��' y '�}�z4 "Y K i��J! �Y�f�"
1957 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOO
CHECK =
_ _ REGISTER
4"OU" T ,-,
ND
:.
...,.YE
455.00
1 25024 _... -_._ .__..,..
1 25024
05/12/87
05/12/87
4.00
533.00
_.._..__.. -.. DEPT NATL RESOURSES
�_._ -. DHR L CENs
DEPT NATL RESOURSES
DNR LICEN
537.0 0
_ , ...._ 1
05/ 12/87.. _. _ ..
_- _ 400. 00
FIRE MARSHALS - -
-- - --- IAL
�
400.00
-. ..MATER
12511
05112'87
3,886.11
ICMA
----- w.___.
�.�_.. # ,. 7E5.93
IClrlA.
DEFERRED COQ
5, b 12. 0�4 *
- ...:__... _ . _.. .._ ......_ .. -- _
aEFERR
- E0_ COW
125M69
O5/12/87
# 2# 4.09
MINN STATE TREAS
,.... ...•,.- ....w.....y..v..- _,_.... ..... ..: nYw..k .tJrr�e
LICENSE
t 4. u t('
469. 00
. _ . ill NN . STATE TREAS
LICENSE
10,683.09 *
I I
t d i i
i 25R# S
a5/# 287
3a • 00
RMSY CNTY RECORDER
RECORDING FEES
30. 0 0
.............
A7 T
t
f
126A77
O S/12/87
QSJ 1 287
3.47
_-._..,- .•.........-
A T 6 T
._....•....,..,_... -.._. _". _._....,.._....,,, - .- .:,�wc.... _ ra.c::r'�
TELEPHONE
•�1�q�� k�,.,�
.�
A77 ...
OS/1 2/a7
62.60
# 97
A T 6 T
A T 6. T
TELEPHONE
S ��� ,I
J lc x
126A77
0sr1 287
_ .......
37.89
__. ,
A T 6 T
TELEPHONE _ ,.- .,.....
3 ��a
'
10S.93
TELEPHONE
{ 4Ik., � �.. �i 1' u � ��
'
� � � � � �
_... _. .._....... .w....._- ,_...r.,...._. -._ -__ . _._ .,. .... .___.- .+___....,._ ..-_ ......ww.
_._.. _,.a.. .... ........,...,.__ .r, •,. --.••, _....w ry w....w -. v.v...•we.+I.
�
t•.4. �� 1
j
� I
- .,I4._
0sf1 2/87 _. _
85 . 00 ,
J�3HN$QN E I LEEN_ . _ __..
CONTRACT Py".
Y•
Ss • a a *
_
126M69
OS/12/87
7, O52 . 17
MINN STATE TREAS
L 1 CENSE
�Y *�
:1.25M69....___.__.
- ..._,._ 355. OQ
Ml. Nw . STATE TREAS
L I CENSE. ......... .....«...w.�•w... .n�.::�r%.
r
4. b >� T �' L t ��5
.... ..�...,.. _.- .__....
.- .._.... .:... _.,.
} •^�"'1' i 1.
Y
T
# 26s9a
asp# 2187
6.86
SUPERAMER I CA
FUEL OIL
-- h
f
126890
2/57 _. �..._..__
asr# 2/87
29.43
U
.._.�._$ PERAMERI CA ._._ ._...,. ......... ....a,_w _._- .-
r
...•.- «- .._...r ✓r. FUEL,.. � I L . _,m•..r,.. �..aur •,.,Y.�� � � Y � �� �� .
1 26 S 90
a5' # 287
2.28
SUPERAMERI CA
FUEL OIL
10-126
SUPERAMER I CA
FUEL OIL
s
Yea
_:. _,.
>.:...w,' ... l; tN�+ Ti � ' <sie'r- n�b:r:vM�.w'.4ir av: wlak++h.w .:.4..:+etl�Ae..Y
va•.:•.Y J +w.•..c.- � � - ' - :
+ r�4�Nri. x�avr '.Mkr.Wa.aM..MNWkowvri�vr+Wx AsM�M!!*):wltMs LY. " iw ".a,.,•.�.•,yy,�yy�bkn<.1Y:..�.
� - '
>..a.f:n.•e..,.. -a++ wen. wr. ro-md. �...-,, weM. w: a, ae++ w•. n_ sro• �: rn *.- .e:w•;a.n:..:..e�.r.•...r•• w •r_.•,..,.,.�..»�.rrn,^r' :.,w«. '�� �
n -_
_ ..f1 ,. x K•
... :.x. H. t.�.n,.. ... f. �kkr� ;�.. ..,
tlt. .. ....�. .. .,.1f ..tea.....
, ,... ... ._ ..n -.
_._ .. :� �"'� r. -•
a .
,.. .. . -,.. o,. ._C �.. t, .., r. -..-r- ..; 3�,. T
� r = =Xu _"x'c.
, ON
�' • "Sr � -T
• .TtF !'•t.F_. 1., . 1 !' i W .:• t.s .r. 1. .� vN. �: i• , ':N,.. L..• � h C
.x. P �,rhy_ .. ,.. :;;fi ', .7. � Sow t + -�. ... _,�� f ,. lr ,.: ;} ', ; A 4." x. L r .s -:i .: ( 5..: ..
.' .. - r .. y _ •' s- >t x..7.J •. 'r: r`lr tit . t . {.;:. <:k� t3'�' ifYft t .Yp,. :.} TC 4 . <Y ♦ •.-. _�. ; ••," `
w } _. ' .. , ..•� ...ar u. .t.s.�,. ".4 .. �' k' ..0 ..:U Y. y' I.n�- rt•,., .1'F
, ..:.z ,b ?uai. .+r5 .._;, ..., . .,.. w -..y .�Y.. _,e.. •2 ....._.. ���,� , ::,t , ; , . a... �•y.• :.: -iAV.. 's<..: � -
.-
.... .4 ...... 2�... -c ._ . ...:,....,.....�r.; .. +ate t -
,
.. I.r., .. .. .: :. ....:..:. . . . ....: ... . .: ,., ... -...
..
,...
-.
�'YEew uyid"1�xiw. fiv ,spa .ipi"•4 4 T �
:., ..:. ....-
..
�.
..
��"" TdT °`"ftnh'S•�. �y Y •Ctrc,• :�� 1 t ...
....,. 1
-
j F
P ag e °
,!
..'. : -.. .u. .� >il Yr. ->✓'• Y:s 'M. na<Yiv v - ,= ".ltc.., ¢y -:J'
S y "yy. i.:
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
CHEck
NO. DATE.
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
... _.__..,..___.__..... VENDOR _..... _ ..._ _.
_ ._.... ITEM DESCRIPTIU
48.83
1 78?4_
05/.12/87
127B94
127B94
OS/12f87
18
4.41 x ' . 41
BUILDERS S+Q .
BUILDERS so.
SUPPLIES
9.4
BUILDER$ $O
SUPPLIES
,
SUPPLIES
127C2S
OS/12/87
-
1 #673-83
!,673.83 *
CANADA LIFE
INSURANCE
127C40
O S/12/87 _
122 50
.
122-SO
_ CLERK. OF CURT
COURT FILING FE
OS/12/87
127C42.
127042
OS/ 12/87
OSf12/87
6.63
9 .68
COMMERCIAL LIFE
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INSURANCE
127
OSf 12/87
303.70
S16.87
COMMERCIAL LIFE
_ INSURANCE
INSURANCE
_ _
918.88 *
COMMERCIAL LIFE
INSURANCE
127M69
127M69
OS/12/87
0S 12/87
1 1, 345.18
MINN STATE TREAS
_
180.00
t *
MINN STATE TREAS
LICENSE
LICENSE
128M20
OS/ 13/87
144, 159.10
_ _.. _
.W.C.C.
144,1S9.10 *
SEXIER RENTAL
12SM69
1 2SM69
OS/ 13/87
05/13/87
6.066.94
MINN STATE TREASURER
577.00
6.643.94 *
MI NN STATE TREASURER
L ENSE
LICENSE
..........
12SN52
OSf13/87
30.00
_ _ .. _.
30.00 *
-. NORTHWOODS AUDOBON._
_TRAVEL, TRAINING `
131 CS6
OS/ 13/87
3,031-3S
COLLINS ELECTRIC
SUPPLIES
I
3 Ci -sc. ...LCt stir.. •R.::
..i Yr: .,,,- i•.' ... .. ._ ...:, .. .r ..
1987 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER
ER
_ CHECK N0 .
QATE _.. ". _ .._......_.._
AMIOUMT . _.._..,_ ...
_ " . .. VENDOR ... - . ... _ ..._
.__.ITEM DESCRIPTION
131 C,58 _...
_._. OS /1 3/87..._ _. _
_ . 109.34
EQUIPMENT-
109-34
131E64
OS/13/87
10000.00
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
DENTAL. CLAIMS
131JOS
OS/13/87
28.80
J.
.PROGRAMS .
28.80
131M69
131M69
OS/13/87
OS/13/87
11,449.SS
_ MINN STATE TREASURER
L
LICENSE
39S.00
MINN STATE TREASURER
LICENSE
11,844.SS
131099
OS/13/87
22.60
OXYGEN SERVICE
SUPPLIES
22.64
146,097.S2
FUND Of TOTAL
GENERAL
100o803-83
FUND 63 TOTAL
86 -3 CENTURY AVE
4SS.00
FUND 64 TOTAL
86 -4 CTY RD CdHW'
144, 1 S9. 10
FUND 90 TOTAL
SANITARY SEWER F
1
FUND 94 TOTAL
DENTAL SELF —INSUI
34.496 ,.7
_FUND. FUND. 9S . TOTAL
PAYROLL . BENEF IT
427,012.17
TOTAL
�.
NECESSARY
.'°
EX'PENDITURE- S__ "_-
SIN -CE __ LAST aOUN . C_LL___MEE- TING-- o _ .,_..
nirncy"7t?:-..ta- +Fic, %.k ,• err; ry _c?` c
...... -..,, .... .y;.'.i s' .,
''tia.•'a('( �k d C'kw..� �Tg .l.+S +s ,. _
iN _<r- st L _
1987 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
- CHECK " REGISTER
_ CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
_ .. - _ _ _
..__ ...ITEM DESCRIPTION
141042
1
OS/14/87
260.00
PEOPLES ELECTRIC
REPAIR MA INT
.. ....
260.00 *
141046
OS/14/87
305-S6
GOODYEAR
REPAIR MA I NT
305.56 *
1410S2
OS/14/87
15S • 00
METRO SALES INC
MAINTENANCE
155.00
141069
OS/14/57
27.00
U S JEST
PAGING LEASE
27.00
141 074
0S/ 14/57
4.00
BATHKE CO
OXYGEN
4.00
41 132
05/ 14/87
20.18
FLICK BARBARA
MILEAGE
20.18
..._.
_
141156 "
05/14/87
1,896.20
STAR SPORTS
PROG SUPPLIES
1"896.20
141170
OS/14/87
275.18
AMERICANA INN
TRAVEL TRAINING
275.18
. 141171 .
05/# 4/87
_
48.00
CAREER TRACK
TRAVEL TRAINING
48.00
141172
OS/14/87
77.92
GLENS REPAIR
REPAIR MAINT
77.92
141173
05/14/87
58.20
GREAT NO AMER CO
SUPPLIES
58.20
141 174
05/14/87
19.39
GUY SPEAKER
SUPPLIES
141174
OS/14/87
25.38
GUY SPEAKER
SUPPLIES
14117 -
0 S .1 /1 4/87_ ,
_ _...._. CS . 38- ...,_ ._
.�._.µ_. GU.Y SPEAKER __ _......__
SUPPLIES
19.39
.. _..._. M
W.._
1 4 1 1 1 7 5 .11
051 # 4/87
9.04
HANSEN DOUG
REFUND - ,
9.00 *
.- __ .._..._...._ __..._ .___._...._..
_..
1411 ?' i
.05/14/87
, •...
34.65
^ :?1 i -- taa. vct Ysw+?T.¢+a„
HIL#.CRE$T GOLD EMGR,E
SUPPLIES
S
c
1:
s
'
w,} .T'.� ci'..5+'!?'R.•tat`.t vtt. .4. ....S::il
Page: 8
"'C .. .a i_ .., ..
1987 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
. . .. ..r _. . -
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
34.65
I
1 41177
OSlf 487
10-SO
KISHEL ROSE
# 0.50 «
141178
OS/ 14/87
1 2.00
1tROLL MICHAEL
REFUND
12.00
141179
03/# 4/8?
10.00
MN MAYORS ASSOC _ ...._..._.
MEMBERSHIP
#0.00
1
OS/t4/87
16.65
NORTHWOOD HOW
SUPPLIES
16.65
I. 41 181
OS/14/87
394.00
MILLER PRINTING
PRINTING
394.00
141 182
141 182
05/14/87
05, 1,4/87
276.50
R. C. IOENTIFICATIONS
SUPPLIES
576.50
R.C. IDtENTIFICATIONS
SUPPLIES
8S3.00
141 AO t
141A01
OS/t4/87
OS/14/87
20.89
ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
ES
14 t AO t
OS/14/87
21.80
8.49
ACE HARDWARE
ACE HARDWARE..
SUPPLIES
141 AO t
141AO
OS/ 14/87
2.35
_:
ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
141 AO t
OS/t4/87
OS/14/87
3.53
31.09
ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
141AO1
OS/14/87
2 8.1b -
ACE HARDWARE
ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
141AOt
05/14'87
28.16
ACE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
88.15
# 4# A02
141A
OS /# 4/87
05 #4,x$7
82.81
ACRO MINN
SUP PLIES
8 2.$#
ACRD MINK
SUPPLIES
16S.62
141A53
OS/14/87
247.49
ARI MECH SERVICES
REPAIR
247.49
14# ASS _
14 1ASS
05/14/87
05/14187
179.07
._ . AM ER I -DATA - SYSTEM - .....__
CONTRACT PYM
# 4 # ASS
OS/14/97
59 9.00
87 # 3
AMERI -DATA SYSTEM
CONTRACT PYM
.
AMER I -DATA SYSTEM
CONTRACT PYM
865.20
14 1A59
OS/14r87
28. 16
AMERICAN FASTERNER
SUPPLIES
28.16
�.
Pa g e:
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK NO DATE
. 05/14/87 .
141A6j9
0
# 4# A6'9
OS1 14187
14 #A69
051 14187
# 4 # A6 9
0
AUTO
SERA
1 4 1 A76
051
1 41A76
OS/ 1 4/87
141A76
OS/
4# A76
0511 4/87
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT _
_ .VENDOR
_.
ITEM DESCRI PT ION
26.83
_ ARNALS
AUTO
SERA
REPAIR MAINT
100.00
ARNALS
AUTO
SERV
REPAIR MAINT
29.70
ARNALS
AUTO
SERV
REPAIR MAINT
655.66
ARNALS
AUTO
SERV
REPAIR MAINT
934.49
ARNALS
AUTO
SERV
REPAIR MAINT
1,746.68 *
PROGRAMS
-
3.55
A T & T
TELEPHONE ,
4.SO
A T & T
1 4 1 B4S
OS/
TELEPHONE
1 2 . 75
A T & T
1 4 1. 84S
03/
TELEPHONE
2.2S.
A T A T
141 B4S
05/14/87
rot cnunaa--
14
051
3, 491 .2S
BANK IGAN&KELLY P.A.
CONTRACT - PYM
# S 5
05/14/87
.206.25
GANNIGAN&KEL P . A :
CONTRACT PYM
#41805
O51 #4187
806.85
__.._ .__
BANNICANSKELLY P.A.
CONTRACT PYM
3,903.75
14 1B36
OS/ 14/87
10.00
BRIGGS CASSIOP I
PROGRAMS
10.0+
1 4 1 B4S
OS/
1 07.60
BOARD OF WATER COMM
UTILITIES
1 4 1. 84S
03/
53.36
BOARD OF WATER COMM
UTILI
141 B4S
05/14/87
1S.04
__.
BOARD OF WATER COMM
UTILITIES ,
14
OS/14/87
24.24
BOARD OF WATER COMM
UTILITIES
14
0 5/14/87
24.24
BOARD OF WATER COMM
UTILITIES
14 B4S
05114187
71.70
BOARD OF WATER COMM
CONTRACT PYM
141 B45
05114187
776.91
BOARD OF WATER COMM
CONTRACT PYM
----1 l 41 B45
OS/ 14/87
_
BOARD OF WATER COMM!
CONTRACT PYM
141844
05
44.70
BOARD OF WATER COMM --
CONTRACT PYM
141843
OS/14/87
22.35
BOARD OF WATER COMM
CONTRACT PYM
141 B4S
OS/ 14/87
89.40
BOARD OF WATER COMM
CONTRACT PYM
141 545
051141$7
47.25
BOARD OF WATER COMM
CONTRACT PYM!
141845
OS/14/87
89.40
BOARD OF WATER COMM
CONTRACT PYM
I, 4S5. S9
14 1C 13
051#4'87
164.90
CARX
REPAIR MAINT
#64.SO
14 049
05114187
648.08
CLINTON 0 GORMAN PA
CONTRACT PYM
648..08
_.._
-
.. - ..
$ -v .. '" "P�.'•�.. r s��4?' ra-_ ' .a.L« ;. ..f' -. ,.._ y_
..
_.:_ ... v. "i. NCt ^•. c.z_x 1.- n � � :VY wF. A .'.Cf .�a.e Aw
1987 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER.
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
141 CSS
OS/ 1 4/87
233 . S#
_.........._...COPY DUPLICATING
DUPLICATING
_ ._._.
141 CS8
OS/14/87
4 6. 44
COPY EQUIPMENT INC
EQUIPMENT
46.44
11062
OS1 1467
1,113.60
CONTINENTAL SAFETY
EQUIPMENT
1,;13.60 w
14170
OS1 14187
220.08
CONSOLIDATED CNTR
SUPPLIES
220.40
141C97
OS/14/87
279.65
CURTIS 1000
SUPPLIES OFFICE
279.65
r
# 41 D30
OS114f87
8.00-
DALCO
SUPPLIES
141D30
05114187
139.88
DALCO
SUPPLIES
131.88
141035
OS/1 4/87
S24.
DALEY PAT
CONTRACT PYM!
S24.00
x#51 1 4187
# , 114.43
DONS PAINT BODY
REPAIR
1.114.43
.... , d.._.....
141D76
05 114187
267.01
DOYLE LOCK CO
LOCKS
267.01
# 4# EO?
45 f4/87
_..
149.63
-_ .. .. _._.
EASTMAN KODAK CQ___ ...___..
DUPLICATING
141E07
0S114/87
6.28
EASTMAN KODAK CO
DUPLICATING
4
O S/_#4/ 8
_..._. el 7.02
EASTMAN KODAK CO
DUPLICATING
141E07
05114187
213.46
_...
EASTMAN KODAK CO'__.
DUPLICATING
141EO7
05114187
280.28
EASTMAN KODAK CO
DUPLICATING
141E07
05114187
239.58
EASTMAN KODAK CO
DUPLICATING
4E07
051 14187
250. 15
EASTMAN KODAK CO _.._..._ .
DUPLICATING
-
- -
1,356.40
'': •hC.- •.eY._ri 3 X55°.'.PY�SZJ�T.�-`�o.'�
aaataww .sue rse.
°
-4�+a r "� -�R"r5
Page: 11
_ :,..._ . -. -.: ;. ......... _ ....+v. !- •
t.::•'..,.. 1 ...7�Gr- .sates. '1sE ' ��x'��+r tlt � f`' ° ,,.c. h R
t987 CITY
OF MAPLEUOOO
CHECK
REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT.
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTI0h
141G#4
t41G 10
051#4187
051 14187
tE.60
G 6 K SE
SERVICES
UNIFORMS
t41G10
05/14/87
tE.60
50.80
G 6 K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
141C #4
05114187
49.54
G d K SERVICES
G d
UNIFORMS
t4
t4tC #0
05114187
OS/t4/87
49 .54 _
K SERVICES
G 6 K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
14tG10
fl5114187
12-60
tE.bO
G 6 K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
14tG1
flSi481
50'80-
C d K SERVICES
C 6 K
UNIFORMS
141GIO
05114/87
50 "80
SERVICES
G d K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
141C10
1 41GIO
05114/87
OS/t4/87
37.80
G d K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
_
1 4 1 GIO
45114187
37.8 Q
37.8#
G 6_K SERVICES
_ . _ .._...__. - UNIFORMS
141GIO
4511487
30.56
C d K SERVLCES
G 6 K
UNIFORMS
14 #G#0
4S1t4187
30.
SERVICES
G 6 K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
141GIO
05/14/87
30.S6
G d K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
UNIFORMS
14tG 10
451 #487
30
18.00
G 6 K SERVICES
_
UNIFORMS
1r4tG10
05114187
18.04
C 6 K SERVICES
G 6
_ UNIFORMS
14 #C #0
OS/t4/87
18
K SERVICES
G 6 K SERVICES
CES
NIFORMS
14tG1 0
fl511 4187
t 8.fl0
G 6 K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
507.9E
UNIFORMS
t4tGE6
OS/t4/87
5t.60
�LENWOOD
51.60 *
WATER COOLER
t 4 t G40
0511 4187
137-40 _
GOODIN C a
137.40
SUPPLIES 4,
1
t 4 t G
OS/t4/87
OS/t
7.99
GENUINE PA
PARTS
. _
SUPPLIES
t4tG46
051141$7
11.27
11.27-
GENUINE PARTS
GENUINE PARTS
SUPPLIES
t41G46
141G46
45114187
451t41$7
11.27
GENUINE PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
141G46
OS/ t4/87 418c7
36.04
10.61-
GENUINE PARTS
GENUINE PARTS
SUPPLIES
141646
14164
fl51t4187
05114187
36.63 _
GENUINE
E PARTS
UPPLIES
SUPPLIES
t4tG46
45/14187
28.53
12.22
GENUINE PARTS
GENUINE PART'S
_ ...
SUPPLIES
14tG46
051t4187
5 . 3 �
GENUINE PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
t4tG46
05114187
.
8245
50.34
MENU
GENU PARTS
SUPPLIES
t 4.t C4G _
4511 4157
32.86
GENUINE PARTS
GENUINE PARTS
SUPPLIES .
1
t4tG46
051 # 4187
45114187
43 • c8-
GENUINE PARTS _ .- _
-- _. __- SUPPLIES .
SUPPLIES
_ 141G46
05114187
85.38
28 . 2 #
GE
GENUINE PARTS
GENUINE
SUPPLIES
. 141646
45114187
33.75-
PARTS
GENUINE PARTS
SUPPLIES .
269.17 *
SUPPLIES
Pa
2
_ .. ... .....i;F a.e .r_,�� ' v. 3sw�W�' e" 4.. adr:si- �ra:.u'�Y:.[s��u::.� %�#r �w�.�..:�t� r. �e�':�'�S .rst ox+�Sw• -s,•ys ..W ...!'� «.s ..... .ri u... >: -s w _,.. r,- ur ___ �.
1987 - CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR -
ITEM DESCRIPTION
141G517
OS/14/87
341.00
GRACE DUANE C
CONTRACT
PYM
341.00
141GSS
OS/14/87
S.40
GREW JANET
PROGRAMS
141 GS8
OS/14/87
17.9S
GREW JANET
SUPPL IES
-
141.GS8
OS/14/87
17.19
GREW JANET
MILEAGE
40.54
. 141H29
OS/14/87
80.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141H29
OS/14/87
1,3S9.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141H29
05/14/87
80.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141H29
OS/14/87
23.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141H29
OS/ 14/87
70.00
HE RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141H2.
OS/ 14/87
58.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141.. H2'
- os/ 14/87
24 .00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
- PYM
141H29
OS/14/87
r._._ _
3S.00
HEALTH RESOURCES. _ .......__ a - -•
CONTRAST
PYM
141H29
OS/14/87
35.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
141H29
OS/1 4/87
35.00
HEALTH RESOURCES
CONTRACT
PYM
1,799.00
141JSO
OS/14/87
903.00
J THOMAS ATHLECTICS
PROGRAMS
903.00
141K33
OS/14/87
1 , 1 SO. 00
KEN NA JOHN J
CONTRACT
PYM
1,150.00
_ . 1 L21
OS/14/87
1 S6 . SS ..... .....
LAKELAND FORD
SUPPLIES
VEH
_ _..
1 4 1 L37
OS/14/87
675.00
LENFER TRANSM
SUPPLIES
VEH
679.00
- 141 L75
OV 4A37
839.S6 _
LONG Lk FORD TRACTOR
REPAIR VEH
839 -S6
- 141LBS
OS/14/$7
27.60
LUGER LUMBER
SUPPLIES
141LBS
OS/14/87
18.45 _
LUGER LUMBER _ _ _ --
SUPPLIES
141L8S
OS/14/87
79.SO
LUGER LUMBER
SUPPLIES
'. .- "'•c � :??r.{.. : -.,'�. w`- '"`,. . N1."+`. •".ES.':j_,a - .:t- ;..�
7t"' "' 4 "�: :ea.Z•.v° =4 :^4 ..
'fJ v:: .'
-
i
i
_.
,.:. _ r r
,::.. _ , .. -., ..- ... ., * .•a? -.. :x«T :
+' 7nt Y fin*• s �'
.ray'" . _ , ,... , ,�, -:py • g ,. ;r`.t?'xi *^^:;_ �. .. , _. � .... ..
Page: 13
.. ..,_ - .. . ; - .._ ... ._
1987 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
_ VENDOR -
ITEM DESCRIPTION
141MOb
OS/14l87
100.00
MASYS CORP
REPAIR MAINT
141 MO6
OS/14/87
21S.00
MASYS CORP
MAINT
31S.00
1 141 M 14
OS/14/87
183.63
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
PUBLISHING
141M14
OS/14/87
35.32
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
PUBLISHING
141 M1 4
OS/14/87
31-40
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
PUBLISHING
1.41 Ml 4
OS/14/87
41.21
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
PUBLISHING
141 M1 4
OS/14/87
11.77
MAPLEWOOD REVIEW
PUBLISH
303.33
141 M2S. _
OS/14/87
_ _ 250. 0.0
MCQUIRE MICHAEL ...
AUTO ALLOWANCE
250.00
141M31
OS/14/87
S27.36
MANPOWER TEMP
PT WAGES
S27.36
141Ma8
05/14/87
1,263.13
MIDWEST ANIMAL SERV
ANIMAL CONTROL
1,263.13
141M90
OS/14/87
1,389.00
MOTOROLA INC
SUPPLIES
1,389.00
141
OS/14/87
128.10
NORTH ST PAUL CITY
UTILITIES
141N30
OS/14/87
12.20
NORTH ST PAUL CITY
UTILITIES
141N30
OS/14/87
66.00
NORTH ST PAUL CITY
UTILITIES
206.30
141 - NSO
05/14/87
S3.28
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
141NSO
OS/14J87
1 .
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
141NSO
O5/ 1 4/87
67.48
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
05/14/87
, O7 t . bO
_NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
141NSO
OSf 14'87
271.10
NORTHWESTERN BELL _
TELEPHONE
141NSO
OS/14/87
51.80
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
051487
51.80
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
1.41 NSO
05/14/87
S1.78
NORTHWESTERN BELL
T ELEPH ONE
141NSO
OS/14/87
_
51.78
-_ _ .mss-_. ._ ..
...
NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
•Th.
-. !w.�. .• 'T!w'.1!° 'xe. kFy.rgf- TEf ;1.� i�:.v9 Ax'rF� L.�'x: �
-.,
- -. ..:.
._;. . ,. . ._ .;_:..., :, ...:... - ;,. , .. : ": ".
v ..•rr'.x
. - � -! .� .stn= tt'.*- .eyY3�G. e;1Lr .. mss. -:a nv_ f;r' <E .y .r ,..,,R;: r,. ,,. 3.,:=
Page: 14
.'<:_.__ ...r .. ..., .._ ..
1987 CITY
OF MAPL EWOOD.
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
141NSO
OS/14/87
S1 . $0
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
3,412.19
141NSO
Q��' # 4 87
6.17
-
iV . � . P'.. _,.. _ __,. . _....._ ..._..._
UTILITIES
141NSO
OS/14/87
2.50
N.S.P.
UTILITIES
141NSO
OS/14/87
3.67
N.S.P.
UTILITIES
141NSO
OS/14/87
2.54
N.S.P.
UTILITIES
141NSO
OS/14/87
478.89
N.S.P.
UTILITIES
141NSO
05/14/87
S. 4S
N.S.P.
UTILITIES
141N80
OS/14/87
37.28
N.S.P.
UTILITIES _
141NSO
OS/14/87
S3S.09
N.S.P.
UTILITIES
1,071.SS
141 N9S
OS/ 14/87
6.00
NUTESON LAV
TRAVEL TRAINING
141 N9S
08/ 14. 87
14.00
NUTESON LA
TRAVEL TRAINING
20.00
141029
05/14/87
23.00
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
SUPPLIES
141029
OS/14/87
15.00
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
SUPPLIES
141029
08.1487
170.00
OCTOPUS CAR. WASH
SUPPLIES
141029
OS/14/87
24 .00
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
SUPPLIES
141029
05/14/$7
15.00
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
SUPPLIES
247.00
141050
OS/14/87
311.86
OLSON GEOFF
TRAVEL TRAINING
311.86
14
OS/14/87
15.56
OSTER ANDREA J
SUPPLIES
#5.56
141P25
OS/14/87
2,500.00
PEAT MARWICK
CONTRACT PYM
2,500.00
141P26
OS/14/87
97.45
PEPSI COLA
CONTRACT PYM
97.45
_14tP30
05/14/87
3,000.00
PETERSON BELL CONY
RETAINER
141P30
05/14187
148.SS
PETERSON BELL CONY
CONTRACT PYM
3,14$.55
_
�y .�J may, qg. .p. y.�. 1�.I 5� ,�y r y.^ •:::
.MR+S`,.S4TT.. *�wh .'.0.7°[y %y : fM14b 'ST�C1 :k
Paaze:
15
1 987 CITY
OF MfAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR _ . _ _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
141P40 «
05/14/87
7.89
PHOTOS TO Ca
SUPPLIES
141 P 4 0
05e l 4/87
29.70
PHOTOS TO CO
SUPPLIES
37.59
141P63
05/14'87
33.75
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS
SUPPLIES
_
33.75
141P64
OS/14/87
14.00
PRETTNER JOSEPH
TRAVEL TRAINING
14.00
141P67
OS/14/87
85.50
PROFESSIONAL PROCESS
CONTRACT
PYM
85.50
* * * * **
141P76
OS/14/87
2.07-
PRENTICE -HALL INC
CONTRACT
PYM
144 P76
OS/14/87
36.S7
PRENTICE -HALL INC
CONTRACT
PYM
34.50
141RO6
OS/14/87
28.00
RAMSEY CNTY
TRAVEL TRAINING
28.00
141 R09
05/14,x87
280 . SS .
RAMSEY COUNTY
CONTRACT
PYM
141 RO9
OS/14/87
10.00
RAMSEY COUNTY
CONTRACT
PYM
141809
OS/14/87
59.72
RAMSEY COUNTY
CONTRACT
PYM
141RO9
OS/14/87
39.59
RAMSEY COUNTY
CONTRACT
PYM
141809
OS /14/87
15.84
RAMSEY COUNTY
CONTRACT
PYM
141809
OS/14/87
S9.72
RAMSEY COUNTY
CONTRACT
PYM
141 RO9
OS/14/87
23.75
_. RAMSEY COUNTY_ :.
CONTRACT
PYM
429.17
141R13
OS/14/87
6.78
RAY DAVIS SONS
SUPPLIES
141813
OS/14/87
523.71. -
RAY. DAVIS SONS _ - _ ...
SUPPLIES
230.49
141 R1 S
OS/14/87
6.00
RAMSEY COUNTY
RECORDING FEES
141R47
05/14/87
24.20
ROADRUNNER
CONTRACT
PYM
24.20
.c r
1987 C I T Y
OF MAPLEWOOD
Page:
16
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
1987 C I T Y
OF MAPLEWOOD
16.47
SEARS
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
_.. _ -_ - .VENDOR _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
*8412
SUPPLIES
# j41 S30
05/1 4/87
1;26-92
# 4I R49 �-
OS/14/87
S0. 00
ROAD
RESCUE
SUPPLIES
# 41 R49
05/14/87 87
47.96
ROAD
RESCUE
SUPPLIES
# # R�49
05
80.82
ROAD
RESCUE
SUPPLIES
#78.78 *
# 4# S37
OS/14/87
20.07
SEMEN
CRNERS
# 4# SO3
OS/1 4/87
82.21
SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
141 SO3
OS/14/87
11.20
SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
# 41 503
OS/14/87
83.88
SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
# 4# SO3
OS/14/87
97. -
_ _ SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
# 4 # S03
OS/14/87
_
26.40
SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
# 4 # SQ3
OS/14/87
146.68
SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
# 4 # SO3
OS/14/87
190.00
SPS
OFFICE PROD
OFFICE SUPPLIES
H END, R _,_._........_...._
CONTRACT PYM
568.34
..._._
20,431.79
14 1SOS
05/14/87
45,76
S S
T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
# 4 1 505
OS/14/87
47.04
S S
T OFFICE
SUPPLIES
92.80
# 4# S# # r. OS /1 4/87 # , 00# .50 S 6 S CRAFTS SUPPLIES
1.41511 05/14/87 190.60 S 6 S CRAFTS SUPPLIES
1,198.10
# 4# S30
OS /1 4/87
16.47
SEARS
#841
SUPPLIES S;
# 4# S30
OS/14/87
36.81
SEARS
*8412
SUPPLIES
# j41 S30
05/1 4/87
1;26-92
SEARS
#8412
SUPPLIES
# 4# S30
OS/14/87
20.00
SEARS
#8412
SAFTY SHOES
200.20
# 4# S37
OS/14/87
20.07
SEMEN
CRNERS
ACE HOW
SUPPLIES
20.07
141S39
OS/ 14/87
S3.23
SHORT
ELLIOT
HENDR
CONTRACT PYM
141539
05/1 87
x,857.24
SNORT
ELL IOT
HENOR
CONTRACT PYM
141539
OS/14/87
10,855.50
SHORT
ELLIOT
HENDR
CONTRACT PYM
# 4# 539
O /87
4 o 665. _..._.._
. _ SHORT
E LLIOT
H END, R _,_._........_...._
CONTRACT PYM
..._._
20,431.79
# 4# SSS
OS/1 4/87
31.00-
SPECIALTY RADII?
REPAIR MAINT
c
Page: l 7
1957 CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
141SSS
O5/14/87
21.50
SPECIALTY RADIO
REPAIR MAINT
141 SSS
OS/14/87
75.00 _
_ SPECIALTY RADIO _ _ _ __-
REPAIR MAINT
141 SSS
O5•/14/87
C95. OO
SPECIALTY RADIO
SUPPLIES
422.50
141 SSS
05/14/87
21.26
ST PAUL CITY OF
SUPPLIES
141 SSS
OS/14/87
10.00
ST PAUL CITY OF
SUPPLIES
31-26
141S68 rti
OS/14/87
153.0.E _ _ ...
__ ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS
PROGRAMS
123.00
141T29
OS/14/87
1,215.23
T.A.SCHIFSKY SONS
REPAIR MAINT
141T39
OS/14/87
242.75
TERRYBERRY
SUPPLIES
242.75
141T6S
OS/14/87
5,079.87
TKDA
CONTRACT PYM
5,079.87
141U50
OS/14/87
3,2$O.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
3,250.00
141U77
OS/14/87
48.50
UNITED BUSINESS MACH
SUPPLIES
45.80
141U78
OS/'14/87
30.39
UNITED ELECTRIC Co
SUPPLIES
30.39
141U86
05/14/87
39.00
UNIVERSAL MEDICAL
MED SUPPLIES
39.00
141V22
OS/14/87
108.00
VASKO RUBBISH REMOV
RUBBISH REMOVAL
141V22
05/14/87
15.00
VASKO RUBBISH REMDV
RUBBISH REMOVAL
141 V22
05/14/87
8.00
VASKO RUBBISH REMOit
RUBBISH REMOVAL
141V22
05/14/87
165.00
VASKO RUBBISH REMOV
RUBBISH REMOVAL
j4,0
1987 CITY
OF MAPLEW000
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR -
ITEM! DESCRIPTION
296-00
141W62
OS/14/87
60.00
WESTERN FIRE CHIEFS
MEMBERSHIP
60.00
141W64
OS/14/87
46.St
WHITE BEAR DODGE
SUPPLIES
46.51
t 4 t W77
09/14/87
34.99
WINDSOR
SUPPLIES
34.99
141W90
05/14/87
5.14-
W W GRAINGER
SUPPLIES
14.1W90
OS/14/87
9.96
W W GRAINGER _ _.. _...... _
SUPPLIES
141W90
OS/14/87
5.09
W W GRAINGER
SUPPLIES
9. 9t
141X30
OS/14/87
5.24
__. XEROX CORD
DUPLICATING
141X30
05/14/87
8.74
XEROX CORP
DUPLICATING
141X30
OS/ 14/87
25.68
XEROX CORP
DUPLICATING
t 41 X30
05/14/87
40.S2
XEROX CORP
DUPLICATING
# 41 X30
OS/14/87
2S.68
XEROX CORP
DUPLICATING
141X30
OS/14/87
50 . S2
XEROX CORP
DUPLICATING
156.38
141240
OS /.14/87
11.29
ZIEGLER INC
SUPPLIES -
44,70S.00
FUND 01 TOTAL
GENERAL
680.74
FUND 03 TOTAL
HYDRANT CHARGE
3S.32
FUND 33 TOTAL
81-20 MCKNIGHT /H'
53.2... _ _..__..__.
_ FUND 45 TOTAL
84-12 BEAM W OF
71.70
FUND 50 TOTAL
85 -7 CRESTVW DR -1
t6,S81.37
FUND 63 TOTAL
86 -3 CENTURY AVE
245.84
FUND 64 TOTAL
86 -4 CTY RD C&HW.
146.45 _
FUND 6S TOTAL .. _...__......�.. _
86 -S H I LLWD OR-E
5..091.64
FUND 66 TOTAL
86 -7 UPR AFTON - M"
44.70 _ ._.
__,r........__. FUND 67 TOTAL
86 -9 HUNT'INGTON
22.35
__..._._... .
FUND 68 TOTAL
86 -10 JEFFERSNS
S9.72
FUND 69 TOTAL
86 -11 HIGHWOOD H(
_
319.40
FUND 70 TOTAL
86 -12 ARKWRIGHT
47. 25
FUND T t TOTAL -
86 -13 CAVES STER' .::
;'.•... 'i
4
'.y. 'tom_ -; f s 4:'7".,u.p4Ty[�ax:y. - c �+uc. i'L?."YP6�
FUND 73 TOTAL
}'w%N ,
86-IS WTR DISTR- -
a rrc_ -.c
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR - ITEM DESCRI PT I OF
89.40 FUND 86 TOTAL. 87 -3 - CASTLE ROO
_
1,471.47 FUND 90 TOT AL _ - SANITARY SEWER F
1 FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE .& EQUIP
t
75,926.78 TOTAL
�� INDICATES ITEMS FINANCED BY RECREATIONAL FEES
DATE 05/12/87
PROGRAM PR 1O
ol N UM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME
C I T Y 0 F M A P L E 0
PAYROLL CHECK REGlSTER: REPO
PAY i t
��, � 09555 02-1801 McGUIRE MICHAEL A 1482n88
-1812 DONALD 2239a20
09556 02 LA
17 -BEHI-I i S N 85; -:-w 2 5
G -TY—MANAGE-R-
JAHN DAVID J 668=25
SWANSON, JR. LYLE E 939a67
CITY HALL MAINT
ZUERCHER
OSTER
12-1 EMERGENCY SERVICES
1607v92
LARRY j
JOHN L 157m60
ANDREA J 412*71
812. 71
09558 10-4474
DAN I EL
09559 10•6523
0;
t IJ 6r 1 % 3 =1 1 AM-T- 1 6N
DIVISION
0 ii-R-10166
09561 12-0908
0.9564 22-0614
09562 • 12-5905
ARLINE
1
;� t
7.7
L
DIVISION
JAHN DAVID J 668=25
SWANSON, JR. LYLE E 939a67
CITY HALL MAINT
ZUERCHER
OSTER
12-1 EMERGENCY SERVICES
1607v92
LARRY j
JOHN L 157m60
ANDREA J 412*71
812. 71
FAUST
DAN I EL
S 10N 21
—FlNAl?%l9'%n"#%E= MADMI6
t IJ 6r 1 % 3 =1 1 AM-T- 1 6N
0.9564 22-0614
HAGEN
ARLINE
1
1168 fa 06
09565 22-4432
MOELLER
MARGARET
A
1214.83
- 66r .22-a 4 4 4 6
09567 22-7550
MATHSYS
VIGNALO
DELORES
K
A
B68n--.
852w25
DIVISION 22
ACCOUNTING
4103m3g
09568 31-2198
AURELIUS
LUCILLE
E
1816. 20
09570 31•9815
SCHADT
MITY
JEANNE
L
A;
752.71
DIVISION 31
CITY CLERK
ADMINISTRATION
2692*91
DATE 05/12/87
PROGR.RM PR 10
10%1 lr�
35
36
37
39
Ll. 0
41
42
-7
49
5.0
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
"I..
C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0
PAYROLL CHECK, REG'ISTEK R8 0C
U., U-1 V.
t J f ? v 5 5
NUM EMPLOYEE,
NUMBER NAME
PAY
09571
33-0547
KELSEY
CONNIE
L
260w59
09572
33-4435
VIETOR
LORRAINE
S
726u65
09
HE y
PAT-R-1-C-14
4 .1 fa %J
09574,
%733-6105
CARLE
JEANETTE
E'
610..23
09575
33-8389
GREEN
PHYLLIS
C
963w37
DIVISION
33 DEPUTY REGISTRAR
2971..36
IN in e —A-4—
lcx;il - Vic - .T — —T X Ao 9
T ki
L I it %sj
i is k s , 4 T+ 4
4
09577
41-2356
RICHIE
CAROLE
L
708. 65
09578
41-2934
SVENDSEN
JOANNE
M
1036. 46
Q �9 5 - 11 "Or
4 1 — W3.46 %0. 0 '3%f
ma
%.Fse
0 m r-- T
I% w ra &.of .. D ---- 5-8- 8---�
09580
41-7636
OMATH
JOY
E
7200-25
09581
41-9263
MART INSON
CAROL
F
619..45
DIVISION
41 PUBLIC SAFETY ADM IN
6676. 17
-A
jr%r-%rw H
09583
42,0251
STILL
VERNON
T
1308w68
09584
42-0457
SKALMAN
DONALD
W
1357s48
0.7%-owj--4a
%Jadf
NELSON
6 Al I % LIU.-
m
i
09586,
09587
42-0990
42-1204
MORELLI
STEFFEN
RAYMOND
SCOTT
J
L
1406. 35
1323w08
I
09589
42-1577
BAN ICK.
JOHN
J
1371.83
09590
42-1660
KOHL
JOHN
C
1174o24
9
'%33RIANES
^61 1"rk ling ,
MIN 1-nul
095.92
42-1930
CLAUSON
DALE
K
1357.48
09593
42-2063
MOESCHTER
RICHARD
M
1557o64
09595
09596
42-2884
42-2899
PELT IER
SZCZEPANSKI
WILLIAM
THOMAS
F
J
1455w26
1031.88
9597
42-3243
!r t'
-C OT
— t
Q"E --- 8-
09598
42-3591
LANG
RICHARD
J
1371: 88
el 9
47 75
PALMA
STEVEN
T
819808
09600
HERB -- -----
cs
t -321 ?.L 8a...
09601
42-6119
DREGER
RICHARD
C
1455m 26
09602
0960;3
42-7686
MEEHAN, J
GREEN
JAMES
E
1308s68
f ww v
N Ew) 10% Im, I A 11. Pl 11
L
14550
` DATE / 2
� 1 x/87
f PROGRAM PR 10
z�
NUt�9 EMPLOYEE NUMBER r
R NAi �E
f
_• 09604 42- -8226
09605 42
STARVE
GREGORY
L
133E.68
--8434
a
DECKER
RONALD
D
�`
13,��..68
P
1 2-
+ . • •Erff
"k- L•
~
09607 42-9204
STOCKTON
DERRELL
T
1308. 68
09608 42- -5867
BOWMAN
RICK
p
� �'•�
1307. 52
DIVISION
42
POLICE SERVICES
36764w28
`8
I
is�
s
1 33EN
09610 43 --0466
HEINZ
STEPHEN
-J
1332. 68
ft ; 7 05611 43- -1785
GRAS'
DAVID
M
140 C
,x. 48
Tw
>; 09613 43-2201
YOUNGREN
JAMES
G
1481.7 1
• i 09614 4, �- -43►16
RA Z SKA ZOFR
DALE
E
139 . +68
09616 43 --7418
3
BERGERON
JOSEPH
A
1 ? 17. •�'
2l
` 09617 43 -7751
MELANDE R
JON
A
1, 81.48
= { DIVISION
43
PARAMEDIC SERVICES
ICES
=�
1.668. 46
i
s t
,
i �
3
JOL
i
3 i 7 (3-
z 615 4 —3333.
W IL LL I AMS
DUANE
J
1251.38
= t
33
!3 5 DIVISION
45
FIRE PREVENTION
•a •�. j
2.72,. 26
37
i
-
- 39
09620 46-0183
RAFT I NE
JANET
L
852a25
40
09622 46• -0:85
80YER
SCOTT
K
L •
745.85
►sL
OS6�3 46- -48�t1
RYAN
MICHAEL
P
1448a92
_
d°
09615 46 -7030
•��
.,, SON
MARTIN
KAREN
SHAWN
��
85 L�. 5
2_ s 46-7236
FLAUGHER
JAYME
L
868. 2 ~ :5
e
_
37
{
DIVISION
46
DISPATCHING SE RV
6447w22
Gy
1
2
52
MCI
53
55
U57
I '
1
I
DATE 05/12/87
PRDG-�RAM PR 10-
C I T - Y 0 F M A P L E W- 0
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO
•i
[71
01 .
rn
I--V N =2
Num
EMPLOYEE
NUMBER NAME
-83--
09640 53-1010
PAY
JAMES
G
1203w45
09641 53-1688
PECK
DENNIS
L
1203w45
09628
51- -687'x'
HAIDER
KENNETH
G
1942s 92
AHL—JR.
09629
51-8993
CHLEBECK
JUDY
M
884w25
T
1557. 95
4- L%
1109
1 vl- 91 Al L.- Tj E, R
It'll
i 214�8-5-%j
ISIGN
DIVISION
51 PUBLIC WORKS ADM IN
3520s23
LOFGREN
JOHN
R
832u25
DIVISION 54
PUBLIC WORKS BLDG
MAISIT
832a25
5-47�-
-R
GERAL W
A
09631
52-1241
KANE
MICHAEL
R
11 13a 61
09649 58-1720
9 6 3 2
52-1431
LUTZ
DAVID
P
1013a 05
ROGER
WL
mff T110
ED W44R. E5--'
09634
52-3473
KLAUSING
HENRY
F
11828 62
09635
52-4037
HELEY
RONALD
J
1062. 65
In ca r-
HARI`% wl
09au- 45- i
o f 4
09637
52-6254
FREBERG
RONALD
L.
1056o65
,
09638
52-6755
PRETTNER
JOSEPH
8
1477. 60
vv-4
1*70-8-4&-
•i
[71
01 .
rn
I--V N =2
M$*l k I ENANCOE
-83--
09640 53-1010
EL I AS
JAMES
G
1203w45
09641 53-1688
PECK
DENNIS
L
1203w45
PRIE
or 0% &,A
W I-L-t-
&-oft
t-t-59 —a-4- Q
09643 53-3970
AHL—JR.
RAY
C
1563u58
09644 53-4671
GESSELE
JAMES
T
1557. 95
4- L%
1109
1 vl- 91 Al L.- Tj E, R
It'll
i 214�8-5-%j
ISIGN
09646 54-3775
LOFGREN
JOHN
R
832u25
DIVISION 54
PUBLIC WORKS BLDG
MAISIT
832a25
09647 58-1014,
NADEAU
EDWARD
A
1084.43
9'9648 51-90
MULWEE
r_% r!w fn rn f"—% r!
I I
A 4 m ank -Z
09649 58-1720
NUTESON
LAVERNE
vv
S
%.0 a ujl�
1424a86
09650. 58-2563
BREHEIM
ROGER
WL
1061m05
DATE 05/12/87
PROGRAM PR10
C I T Y O F M A P L E W 0.
PAYROLL CHECK RAG I ST E R: REPO
09657 61 -1993
KRUMMEL
BARBARA
A
••
09658 61- -2618
NUM EMPLOYEE
NUMBER NAME
1-367. 26
PAY
s
0
096 58-2582
EDSON
DAVID
8
1100w32
58-5993
OWEN
GERALD
C
1121. 85
}
DIVISION
58 SArd SEWER OPERATION
ROBERT
2 ?
689c. 8,r.,
91 3. 05
09661 62 --3915
L I NDORF F
DENNIS
P
1081w85
' 1 1
f
"j 1
vviALTER --- ----
--
09663 62 --4121
HELEY
i
;" i
K ti.f LwJ .....�_. i 'i•' �••.
- __.._.- - , MU T ` i, 7 ir• Y i•I fir• is
09664 62 -5506
rJ
0-9654 59- -9750
MACDONAL.D
JOHN
E
1161, 85
f
13
k +arm
M a+rw•aNwr`swr�swp�e
-
SB RAG I A
WARREN
J
210s00
DIVISION
5 9 VEH & E
EQUIP P MAIrdT
DAVID
A
'rJ :� C
`356, 50
DIVISION 62
PARK MAINTENANCE
7128.81
t
.
tf
i 3 I
09669 6
SHELDON
LEO
B
S9
t
Z_=
09655 61-0389
ODEGAR D
ROBERT
D
1
17 .3. 08
0967 63 --6482
WARD
TAUBMAN
ROY
DOUGLAS
13
J
1056.85
09657 61 -1993
KRUMMEL
BARBARA
A
s c. Sx
408w23
09658 61- -2618
STAPLES
PAUL.INE
1-367. 26
s
DIVISION 61
COMM 'SERVICES ADMIN
4366w82
S
1
C �' rS
0 � ._ _ ,fir
AURE US
Ti ' 1 %zwo S
E
1 09660 62-3790
ANDERSON
ROBERT
S
91 3. 05
09661 62 --3915
L I NDORF F
DENNIS
P
1081w85
vviALTER --- ----
--
09663 62 --4121
HELEY
ROLAND
B
1066. 17
09664 62 -5506
MARUSKA
MARK
A
1175.45
09666 68 --7768
SB RAG I A
WARREN
J
210s00
F 09667 62 —8182
GE RM A I N
DAVID
A
1098u64
DIVISION 62
PARK MAINTENANCE
7128.81
t
.
09669 6
SHELDON
LEO
B
46. 31
09670 63 --1808
L I NDORFF
TODD
M
93u75
r
0967 63 --6482
WARD
TAUBMAN
ROY
DOUGLAS
13
J
1056.85
DIVISION 63
RECREATION PROGRAMS
16 f 3 w , 2
DATE 05/12/87
4
4i
PROGRAM PRIO.
C. I T Y O F M A P L E W
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER- REPC
��E
'EMPLOYEE
JOHNSON
RANDALL L. 1099s 96
DIVISION 72
PLANNING
2212403
NUM
NUMBER NAME
MARJORIE 1391026
hl z M M I ta
H OuLm 59-s- 4
-7 4
09685 74-0776
09686 74-9223
DIVISION 74
PAY
f
FUND NOT ON FILE
141650m02,
GRAND TOTALS
141650* 02
09673 64-0508'
GREW
JANET
M
892o25
09674 64-0989-
FLICK
RA,
BARBAS-T-
L
270, 52
t '3675 ---64— -16 %00
CH�1 1
*54 a-
�
09676 64-4624
HORSNELL
JUDITH
A
454e64
DIVISION
64 NATURE CENTER
807 93
09 677 71 —01
DOHERTY
KATHLEEN
M
745.851
7%j f W551---
Ot P#
%Eaqf"�m O F R E 701-1
0967'9 71-3174
WESWERTH
JUDITH
A
415s84
09680 71-8754
LIVINGSTON
JOYCE
L
323624
DIVISION
71 COMM DEVELOPMENT
ADM IN
3186* 41
�i
l e i
lei
09682 72-8505
JOHNSON
RANDALL L. 1099s 96
DIVISION 72
PLANNING
2212403
09683 73-0677
In A
Q I InLI
OSTROM
L r) . 9 GeV —1—NS P
MARJORIE 1391026
hl z M M I ta
H OuLm 59-s- 4
-7 4
09685 74-0776
09686 74-9223
DIVISION 74
WENGER
GIRARD
HEALTH INSPECTIONS
ROBERT J 1234e63
LAWRENCE M 210000
1444. 63!
FUND NOT ON FILE
141650m02,
GRAND TOTALS
141650* 02
MATTHEw J. LEviTT
COLE 0ZHLER
ROBERT M. Bowxx
FRANK H&mxoxD
LEONARD J. KEYES
ROBERT G. SHAR
BURT E. SwAwsox
M. J. GALv3w, JR.
DAVID C. FonsBERG
JOHN J. MCNEELY
McNium V. SEYMOUR. JR.
JERRY F. RoTx"
TERENCE N. DOYLE
RICHARD H. KYLE
JOHN L. DzvNmy
RoxAim L. SonEwsow
PETER H. SEED
SAMUEL L. HANSON
RONALD E. ORcrwin
JOHN TROYER
STEPHEN WINNICK
AvRoN L. Gow)ox
JOHN R. KzxEncr,
THOMAS A. LARSON
DAvill) J. SPENCER
DANIEL J. COLE, JR.
DouGL&s L. Sma
MICHAEL H. JBizommus
R. SCOTT DAMES
J. PATRICK McDAvITT
JOHN B. VAN DE NORTH, JR.
RiCHAB G. MARK
AxDREw C. Szij)EN
ANDREW C. BECHER
JEFFREY J. MYES
JAMES E. NELSON
JzRoxz A. Gnis
STrvE A. BRAND
JOEL H. GOTTESMAN
ALAN H. MAc=N
JEFFREY F. SHAW
MATTHEW L. LEviTT
D,wm G. GREENING
DAVID B. SAND
DANIEL M. COUGHL&W
JOSEPH P. NoAcR
CHART.1r,s R. ITAyxoR
ANDREA M. BOND
TIMOTHY P. FL&Hmm
MARTIN H. Fisir
Roinw J. PR&TTE
JOHN BuLTENA
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS AND MORGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
JAMES G. RAY
RICHARD H. MARTIN
TRUDY J. H&LL&
MARY L. IPP.RL
JAMES A. VOSE
RoByw L. HA-wsEN
ROBERT E. WOODS
WIT.T.TA J. JOAN-IS
MARGARET K. SAVAGE
BRI.A.w G. BELISLE
TONY STEMBERGER
MARY E. ScnAwwma
MICHAEL H. STREATER
JOHN H. LUMSTROM
RICHARD D. ANDERSON
SALLY A. ScoGwN
DAVID C. McDoNALD
BRUCE W. MooTy
Duc Nussox
ANDREW 1R. KixTziNeER
FREDERICK P. ANGST
Romm L. LEE
ANN HuNTRoDs
ELIZABETH J. ANDREWS
GREGORY J. STENmor.
CHARLES B. Roexits
TERRY L. SLYE
MAUREEN E. WARnzw
MARY M. DyRsETH
PATRICiK M. GARRY
TIMOTHY E. MARx
CHERYL A. THOMAS
KEVIN A. BERG
MARK SC HROEDER
M. BRxGi.D McDoxouGH
MARIAN M. DunKiN
CHRISTOPHER C. CLEVELAND
NANCY D. ARmsoN
MICHAEL J. McELLIsTREy
PAUL S. JACO13
NEAL T. BUETHE
TIMOTHY J. KERwAN
CARLOS R. CARRAs
KRISTIN S. MELBY
ELENA L. OsTBY
KEVIN J. HiNiKER
ROBERT D. Sicom:
RUTH J. KELxAm
VINCENT A. THOMAS
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL,, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (612) 291-1215
TELECOPIER (612) 222-4071
INCLVDIWO THE FORMER FlIEZ24 OF
LEVITT,, PALMER,. BOWEN,. ROTMAN & SHAPE
A . Dy
Ma 15, 1987 Act 'on "'-- Counall'i".01
Endorsed..._..... .
Modified,
Ms. Lucille Aurelius Re
Cit of Maplewood Date
1830 East Count Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: $8,500,0.00 Cit of Maplewood
Variable Rate Demand Purchase
Multifamil Housin Revenue Bonds,
Series 1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments
Limited Partnership. Project-).
Dear Lucille:
OF COUNSEL
J. NEIL MORTON
RICHAR E. KYLE
JOHN M. PALMER
SAMUEL H. MORGAN
FRANK N. GRAHAM
A. LAuRExcE DAvis
CjARENcE G. Flumn
JOHN M. SULLIVAN
Enclosed in connection with the above-referenced matter
is s a cop of a Resolution to be acted upon b the Cit Council
at its meetin on Ma 21, 19870
The Resolution authorizes the extension of the Disbursement
Date from June 1, 1987 to December 1, 1987. The Disbursement
Date is the date on which disbursements ma be made from the
Construction Fund in .accordance with the provision of Section
3..05(4) of the Loan A entered into in connection with
the above-.referenced Bonds. Attached to the Resolution is
a re for extension b Beaver Creek Apartments Limited
Partnership and an opinion of Bri and Mor that the extension
to December 1, 1987 will not 'impact on the tax exempt status
of the Bonds.
Also enclosed is a certificate of Beaver Creek Apartments
Limited Partnership settin forth the facts and circumstances
necessitatin their re for an extension.
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 2400 IDS CENTER
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(012) 291-1215 (012) 339-0661
BRIGGS -A-WID MORGA1+-T
Ms. Lucille Aurelius
Ma 15, 1987
Pa Two
In the event that the Cit does not approve the extension
from June 1'. 1987 to December 1, 1987 the Trustee is re
to redeem the Bonds and therefore, the project if undertaken
b Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership will be from
a source other than tax exempt financin
If y ou have an q uestions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Ver trul y ours,
ZZ,
Mar L. Ippel
MLI:jms:016
Enclosures
D10 /016
RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION
REGARDING THE DISBURSEMENT DATE
IN CONNECTION WITH
A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS:
(a) The City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") issued
its Variable Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue
Bonds, Series 1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership
Project) in the principal amount of $8,500,000 on December
27, 1985 (the "Bonds "), in connection with which the City
entered into an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture ") dated
as of December 1, 1985, by and between the City and First
Trust.Company, Inc., as Trustee, and a Loan Agreement (the
"Loan Agreement ") dated as of December 1, 1985, between the
City and Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership (the
"Borrower ") ;
(b) The proceeds of the Bonds were loaned to the Borrower
for the acquisition, construction and equipping of a multifamily
housing development (the "Project ") approved by the City,
..all as further described in the Indenture and the Loan Agreement ;.
(c) Section 3 -1(8) of the.Indenture requires that the
Disbursement Date must occur on or prior to December 1, 1986,
unless the City, at the request of the Borrower, extends such
date at the request of the Borrower and upon receipt by the
City and the Trustee of an opinion of Bond Counsel to the
effect that -such extension will not adversely affect the tax
exempt status of the Bonds;
(d) The City Council previously extended the Disbursement
Date -from December 1, 1986 to June 1, 1987;
(e) The Borrower has requested, pursuant to a Request
for Extension attached as Exhibit A hereto, that Disbursement
Date be extended by the City, as Issuer of the Bonds, from
June 1, 1987 to December 1, 1987; and
(f) Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, Bond
Counsel, has advised the City and rendered an opinion, attached
as Exhibit B hereto, that granting such extension for the
extension of the Disbursement Date will not, by itself, adversely
affect the tax exempt status of the Bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to Section 3 -1(8) of the Indenture, the
City hereby approves the Request for Extension and extends
the Disbursement Date f rom'June 1, 1987, to no later than
December 1, 1987.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota this 21st day of May, 1987..
EXHIBIT A
$8,500,000 City of Maplewood Variable Rate
Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds,
Series 1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership Project)
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership (the "Borrower "),
hereby requests, pursuant to Section 3 -1(8) of that certain
Indenture of Trust dated as of December 1, 1985, by and between
First Trust Company, Inc. and the City of Maplewood and Section
3.01(1) of that certain Loan Agreement dated. as of December
1, 1985, 'between the City and the Borrower, that the Disbursement
Date ( as defined in the Indenture) be extended from . June 1,
1987 to June 1, 1987. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is an
opinion of Bond. Counsel dated May 25, 1987, stating that such
extension will not adversely affect the tax - exempt status
of the Bonds.
Beaver Creek Apartments Limited
Partnership
MATT HEW J. Ls viTT
DOCOLAs L. Sxo
COLE OEHLER
MICHAEL H. JESo Nixiis
RosERT K. BOWEN
R. -SC DA VI ES
FRANK HuaxoND
J. PAT RIc x McDAviTT
LEONARD J. KEYES
JOHN B. VAN DE NORTH. JR.
ROBERT G. SHARE
RICHARD Co. MARK
BURT E. SWAxsox
ANDREW C. S ELDEN
M. J. GALVIN. Jet.
J C. BECHER
DAVID C FORN
JE FFREY J. KEYES
JOHN J. McN EELY
JAMES E . NELSON
MCNEIL V. SEYMOUR. JR.
cJE ROME A. Cpsts
JERR F. RoTxA
S TEVE A. BRAND
TERENCE N. DO YLS
JOEL H . Go rmsMAN
RI CHARD H. KYLE
ALAN H. MACLIN
JOHN L. DEVNET
J EFFRET F. SHAW
RONALD L. SORENSON
MATTHEW L. LEVITT
PETER H. SUED
DA VID G. GREENING
S AMUEL L. HANsov
DAVID B. SAND
RONALD E. ORCHARD
DAN M. COUGHLSN
JOHN TROYER
JOSEPH P. NOACK
STEPHEN WI NNICI[
CHARLES R. HATNOR
AV RON L. GORDON
A NDR EA M. BOND
JOHN R. KENEFIC
TI MOTHY P. FLAHERTY
T HONAs A . LA RSON
MARTIN H. FISK
DA VID J. SPENCER
Ro inirr J. PRATTE
D ANIEL J. COLE, JR.
JOHN Bv LTENA
LAW O F I I CE S
J,&%fFS Co. RAT
TYR RY L, SLYx
Ric"ARD H. MAR TIN
MA I:REEN E. WARREN
` \
R I G G S 13 NI OF (I
THI;OY •f. H A LLA
MARY M. D YRSETH
.F3 .� N ' ' . N
MAKY L. IPPrL
PATRICK M. GARRY
•IAXHS A. VO SE
TIMOTHY E. MARX
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Ro IIYN L. HA NSEN
CHERYL A.TH OMAS
R our.RT F. W<xm
KEvtN A. Bt:Ro
W ILLIAM .1. •IOANIS
MA RK SCHROEDER
MAWURET K. SAVAGE
M. BRzoin MCDONOtiGH
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK DUILDING
B RIAN G. Br. I.1SLE
MARIAN X.Dosxi.N
TONY STEMAERGKR
CHRISTOPHER C. C LSVELAND
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
M ARY E. Sc HAFFNER
NANCY D. ARNiSON
MICHAEL H. STREATER
MICHAP.L J. MCELLISTRF.M
JOHN H. LINDSTROM
PAITL S. JArossim
RICHARD D. ANDERSON
NEAL T. BU ETHE
TELEPHONE )4312) 291-12145
SALLY A. CCOOCiIN
TimOT11 J. KEENAN
DAVID C. MCDONALD
CARLos R. CARRASQUILW
BRUCE W MOOTY
KRISTIN S. M ELBY
TELECOPIER (012) 22:.'.-4071
ERIC NILSSON
ELENA L.OsTBY
ANDREW R. KINTZINOER
KEVIN J. HINIxER
FREDERICK P. ANGST
ROBERT D. SICOLI
ROBERT L. LEE
RUT J. KELNAN
ANN HUNTRODS
VINCENT A. THOMAS
INCLUDING THE FORIKER FIRM OF
ELIZABETH J ANDREWS
GREOORT J. S TENMOB
LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE
CHARLES B Roo
OF COUNSEL
J. NEIL MORTON
RICHARD E. KY LE
May 5 19 8 7
JOHN M. PALMER
y r
SAMUEL H. M ORGA.
FRAxx N. GRAHAM
A.I.AURENCE DAVIS
C LARENCE G. FRAM
EXHIBIT B
JOHN M. SULLIVAN
City of Maplewood
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
First Trust Company, Inc.
First National Bank Building
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Re: $8,500,000 City of Maplewood Variable
Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily .Housing
Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Beaver Creek
Apartments Limited Partnership Project)
Gentlemen:
We acted as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance
by the City of Maplewood (the "City ") of its $8,500,000 Variable
Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series
1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership Project)
(the "Bonds ") on December 27, 1985. The proceeds of the Bonds
were loaned to Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership
(the "Company ") to acquire, construct and equip a multifamily
housing development located within the corporate limits of
the City (the "Project ") pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated
as of December 1, 1985 (the "Loan Agreement "). The Project
will be owned, operated and maintained pursuant to the pro -
visions of a Regulatory Agreement (the "Regulatory Agreement "),
dated as of December 1, 1985 by and between the City, the
Company and the Trustee (as defined below) The Bonds are
secured by an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture ") between
the City and First Trust Company, Inc., in St, Paul, Minnesota
(the "Trustee ") dated as of December 1, 19850
We have been requested by the Company to deliver our
opinion to the City and the Trustee that the extension of
the Disbursement Date (as defined in the Indenture) to December
1, 1987 will not adversely affect the tax - exempt status of
14200 FIRST NATIONAL RANK Bi;II.DINO 2 IDS CENTKE?
SAINT 1 XINNFSOTA 55101 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 35402
4312) 201-1.'.1:5 Riles'.) 3:30 - OHfi1
13ItIGC;S u N1 0RGAN'
May 25, 1987
Page Two
the Bonds. In this regard, we have examined various documents
that were considered necessary as the basis for this opinion,
including a Certificate of Company of even date herewith
On the basis of the foregoing, it is our opinion that
according to present laws, regulations, rulings and judicial
decisions, the extension of the Disbursement Date to December
1, 1987 will not impair the tax - exempt status of the Bonds.
In rendering this opinion we have not independently
verified or conducted any independent investigation of factual
matters, but we have re lied upon the information and .facts
reflected in the documents which we have examined.
BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A.
By - - - - --
Brian G. Belisle
BGB /bl /12
$8,500,000
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
VARIABLE RATE DEMAND PURCHASE MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING REVENUE BONDS,
SERIES 1985
(BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT)
I, Kenneth D. Gervais do hereby certify and declare
that I am the. managing partner of Knights Group, a. Minnesota
general partnership, the general partner of Beaver Creek
Apartments Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership
(the "_Company "), and that:
1. This Certificate relates to the $8,500,000 Variable
Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series
1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership Project)
( the "Bonds ") , issued by the City of Maplewood (the "City" )
on December 27, 19850 The proceeds of the Bonds were loaned
by the. City to the Company to acquire, construct and equip
a multifamily housing development located within the corporate
limits of the City (the "Project ") pursuant to a Loan Agreement
dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Loan Agreement " ). The
Project will be owned, operated and maintained pursuant to
the provisions of a Regulatory Agreement (the "Regulatory
Agreement"),, dated as of December 1, 1985 by and between the
City, the Company and the Trustee (as defined below). The
Bonds are secured by an Indenture of Trust (the. "Indenture ")
between.the City and First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul,
Minnesota (the "Trustee ") dated as of December 1, 19850
2. In accordance with Section 3 -1(8) of the Indenture,
the Company has requested that Briggs and Morgan, P.A., as
Bond Counsel, deliver an opinion to the City and the Trustee
that the extension of the Disbursement Date to December 1,
1987 will not adversely affect the tax - exempt status of the
Bonds.
3. The development of the Project and its construction
have been proceeding with due diligence from the date the
Bonds were issued, however, due to circumstances that we did
not reasonably anticipate, construction of the Project and
satisfaction of. the underwriting criteria necessary to remarket
the Bonds have been delayed substantially and, consequently,
it is necessary to extend to December 1, 1987 the Disbursement
Date and its concomitant preconditions. The following circum-
stances have caused construction of the Project and remarketing
of the Bonds to be delayed:
a. Access to the Project site is provided
by a 1000 foot street that was constructed by
the Company. Access to the Project site is
limited to travel on this road and construction
of the Project buildings could not proceed until
its completion.. The road was completed in late
October, 1986. Construction of the road was
delayed because: (i ) subsurface preparation
could only be done during winter. because of
water problems and substantial delays occurred
as a result of severe weather conditions; (ii)
more peat removal and sand fill was .required
than originally planned; (iii) the Company decided
after the Bonds were issued that it would dedicate
the road to the City rather than maintain it
as a private road which caused delays as a result
of the City's involvement in design specification
and public hearing.
b. After the Bonds were issued the
City activated a storm water and sewer project
which involved the Project site. The Company
was actively involved in negotiating. its involve -
ment in that project, including the granting
of easements and attendance. at public. hearings.
The City's storm water project precipitated
by the Company's development of the Project
and which is part of the Project's development,
involved the construction of storm water retention
ponds on the Project site at an expenditure
by the City of in excess of $300,000.
C, Because of the sensitivity surrounding
the payment of "prevailing wages" by nonunion
contractors on projects such as the Project
financed by tax - exempt obligations of the City
of Maplewood, the Contractor selected by the
Company withdrew in June of 1986 and a. new
contract was renegotiated with another contractor,
Kraus Andersen, the. original second -low bidder.
Kraus Andersen was required, in turn,. to relet
many of its subcontracts.
d. Additional. soil testing and a study
was required because of soil settling problems
on land adjacent to Building B. The study,
which was recently completed, determined that
this land should be presettled by surcharging
the soil while constructing Buildings A and
C.
2
e. In addition to devoting substantial
time and effort to the foregoing, Washington
Service Corporation, as the general partner
of the Company responsible for the active
'development of the Project, had encountered
additional management .problems competing with
the development of the Project. Washington
.Service Corporation attempted to mitigate this
problem by seeking the assistance of another
developer. on or about April 1, 1987, Washington
Service Corporation transferred its entire.
interest in the Company to Knights Group which
is now acting as substitute general partner
and developer. This change in developer has
also caused delays in proceeding with the
Project' s completion.
5. The Company has, since the Bonds were issued, paid
or incurred f rom its own f unds in excess of $400,000 in
developing the road to the Project building site and in bringing
water and sewer lines to that site. The Company's,total
investment in the Project to date is in excess of $1,00
.The Project is part of a planned unit development which limits
construction of the Project site to the Project as designed
at the date of closing. Failure to proceed with the Project
as planned will cause the Company to incur a substantial
economic loss that is not set of f by arbitrage earnings
6 . The Company will, within 60 days hereof , commence
site grading and the surcharging of overburden on the site.
Such overburden must be. monitored for up to three months to
determine settling of loose soil located subsurface at the
Project site. Also, at or about the same time, site work
will occur in completing a water main on the Project site
to. complete the City's system and permit connecting the Project
to the City's water main. Construction of the Project will
take approximately one year to fully completeo occupancy
of portions of the Project might : occur earlier.
7. Potential permissible arbitrage profit has not
been a consideration in the timing of the development and
construction of the Project. The arbitrage profit earned
to date of approximately $70,000 will not offset the in excess
of $1,000,000 of costs incurred to date by the Company.
8. As a result of bringing in Knights Group as a
substitute general partner of the Company, the very recent
withdrawal of a general partner in the Knights Group partner-
ship, and the addition of certain underwriting criteria, the
Company must obtain a credit enhancement and liquidity letter
of credit. The Company was unaware of these additional
underwriting criteria because of certain miscommunications
by Glaser Financial Group, Inc., the firm which is reviewing
the Project's feasibility and underwriting requirements.
V
9. It is reasonably expected that the Company will
obtain before November 1, 1987, the credit support necessary
to permit use of the proceeds of the Bonds for construction
of the Project. Further, it is anticipated that because of
the .demand for rental units within the City, occupancy of
the Project will occur much faster than the 2 years assumed
in the Project's feasibility studies.
100 This Certificate. is made to induce the issuance
by Briggs and Morgan, P.A. of its special tax opinion of even
date herewith and the statements herein are representations
of the Company as to the facts recited therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
day of May, 1987
BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
A Minnesota Limited
Partnership
By Knights Group, a
Minnesota General
Partnership, its
General Partner
By
Kenneth D. Gervais,
Managing Partner
4
1'
I C,
k
J
f � '
Agenda Number
er
Action by Co'lxnc
AGENDA REPORT
Endorsed.
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant Cit Engineer Rejecte
SUBJECT Water Service District 8 Improvements With Sterlqq �}
and Schaller Drive Construction
City Project 86- 15-- Public Hearing
DATE: May 13, 1987 -
INTRODUCTION
A public hearing has been called for 7 p.m, on May 21, 1987 for the
Linwood Road area water tower and water system improvements which also
includes a report on the construction of Sterling Street from south of
Mailand Road to Highwood Avenue. In addition the report recommends
that the collector street north of Highwood Avenue (preliminarily
called.Schaller Drive) be constructed from Sterling Street to the
Jefferson Fourth Addition in order to provide sanitary sewer and storm
sewer service to the properties that the new Sterling Street frontage
would create. All properties within this water service district have
.been notified of this hearing.
BACKGROUND
In August 1986 the city council initiated a feasibility report to study
the improvement of Water District 8. This initiation was in response
to staff recommendations to limit development until water pressure
problems were resolved. In February 1987 the planning commission and
city council adopted an alignment for Sterling Street between Mailand
Road and Highwood Avenue and authorized the expansion of the
feasibility report to include the construction *
f trunk water mains,
sanitary sewers and storm sewers and the street section associated with
Sterling S treet .
ALTERNATIVES
1. Reject the improvement.
2. Order only the tower and trunk
3. Order the project as proposed
water mains,
in the attached feasibility report.
DISCUSSION
10 Option One is the reject the project approach. This option would
seriously deter or halt development in this entire area. Fire fighting
capabilities are quickly approaching deficient and approval of
additional plats w i tho-ut appropriate action to remedy the water
deficiencies would possibly open the city to a liability situation,
2. Option Two considers addressing only the water deficiency
problems. The Sterling Street right -of -way would be used for the trunk
mains to connect the booster station to the water tower and the
Highwood Avenue water system. Easements would be needed along the
alignment and the clearing, grubbing and rough road bed grading would
need to be completed for the water main construction, which are costs
usually associated with roadway construction. The sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and street construction under this option would.be
completed by the developers of each parcel. The size of each
development and the looping of water main and sanitary and storm sewer
gravity flow requirements greatly restrict the options available for
development other than a_-joint development project by the four affected
property owners. In addition, Sterling Street and Schaller Drive are
proposed as collector streets and should be designed to carry a higher
level of traffic. As development of the area continues, these
collector streets will be needed to insure a smooth flow of traffic
through the area. Additional consideration should be given to .
potential assessments under this option. In addition to higher unit
costs the lateral frontage rate may be more difficult to sustain
because sanitary sewer and street would not be available.
3. Option Three is the approach proposed in the attached feasibility
study. The water tower, booster station and trunk water main
oversizing would be constructed on a system -wide basis. The trunk
mains would provide lateral benefit along the proposed roadways and
would be assessed to the developers. Sterling Street would be
constructed as a state- aid street and financed accordingly. Schaller
Drive would be constructed due to the need to provide gravity sanitary
and storm sewer systems along Sterling Street. The costs of Schaller
Drive are proposed to be paid by the property developer. This option
provides for an orderly development of the area and should insure the
existing area residents that their utility service and street system
will remain adequate while surrounding properties develop. A proposed
project schedule is attached to this report to indicate that this
entire project could be operational by August 1, 19880
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the council order the improvement as proposed
under Option Three by passing the attached resolution. Construction of
the water improvements will address pressure and fire- fighting
deficiencies which currently are approaching serious levels. The sewer
and roadway improvements are a solid foundation for the area to develop
on and are also needed to insure continuation and adequate service to
the existing residents due to the pending developments
BUDGET IMPACT
The costs listed within the report include construction costs,
contingencies and indirect costs without- right -o f -way and easements.
The following financing summary includes the right -of -way and easement
costs as part of the total project cost:
Total
Recovery
Cost City
Item Cost_
Units
Rate Recovery Partic,
Tank.,
Booster Station,
1,060 Units
$100 /Unit
Main oversizing $829,500
1 1 705 Units
$250 /Unit $532,250 $297,250
Sterling Street $868,100
8 FF
$ 35 /FF $287,000 $581,100
Schaller Drive $ 84,000
1 FF
$ 70 /FF $ 84,000 $ 0
water Main $282,000
9 FF
$ 30 /FF $282,000 0
San. Sewer $322,400
10,400 FF
$ 31 /FF $322,400 $ 0
Storm Sewer $414
4,600,000 SF
$0.09 /SF $414,000 $ 0
Total $2,800
--
-- $1,921,650 $878,350
The proposed assessment area,
as shown on
the attached map, for the
tank, booster station and main oversizing
is from Lower Afton Road on
the north to Boxwood Avenue
extended to L
-494 on the south. The area
between Londin Lane and Hillwood
Drive was
previously assessed for the
booster station in 1979 at
a $450.00 per
acre rate. It is proposed
that these parcels receive
a $150.00 per
lot credit for this
assessment. All frontage
along the proposed
Sterling Street and
Schaller Drive is proposed
to be assessed
for street, water main at
lateral rate and sanitary
sewer. In addition,
the sanitary sewer
frontage along Linwood Avenue
between Dorland
Road and proposed
Sterling Street is proposed for sanitary
sewer assessment. The storm
sewer area proposed for assessment
is as
shown on the drainage area map
in the feasibility report.
City participation is recommended to offset the $150.00 per lot credit
issued for the booster station and trunk main oversizing. This amount
($297,250) is proposed. to be financed from the city-Is hydrant fund.
Participation is also recommended for the street costs along Sterling
Street as a state -aid street. It anticipated that this section of
Sterling can be designated a part of the city's state -aid street
system. The $35.00 per front foot rate is the accepted rate by city
policy for a state -aid street, with the remaining costs ($581,100) to
be paid from the state -aid allotment. The balance in the MSA allotment
is currently $2,633,000 with the annual allotment decreasin g because
the city has not expended its funds in recent years.
ACTION REQUIRED
10 Conduct public hearing.
2. Pass resolution ordering project and authorizing preparation of
plans and specifications.
]c
Attachments
WATER SERVICE DISTRICT S IMPROVEMENTS
AND STERLING STREET AND SCHALLER DRIVE
CITY PROJECT 86 -15
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
1. Council approves feasibility report May 11, 1987
2. Council holds public hearing Ma y 21, 1987
30 Council approves plans for:
a. Tower June 22, 1987
b. Utilities June 22, 1987
c. Booster station June 22, 1987
d. Streets April 11, 1988
4. Bids received and opened:
a. Tower July 17, 1987
b. Utilities July 17, 1987
c. Booster station July 17, 1987
d. Streets May 10, 1988
5. Assessment hearing (special meeting) August 13, 1987
610 Council awards bid for:
a. Tower September 14, 1987
b. Utilities September 14, 1987
c. Booster station September 14, 1987
d. Streets May 23, 1988
7. Start of construction:
a.
Tower
b.
Utilities
c.
Booster station
d.
Streets
8. Construction complete:
a.
Tower
b.
Utilities
c.
Booster station
d.
Streets
October 5, 1987
September 28, 1987
July 1, 1988
June 6, 1988
July 15, 1988
June 1, 1988
August 1, 1988
August 1, 1988
_1
UPPER AFTON RD N o a
c
i -
39
LOWER
r, y
ti
LONDIN LA
' cr t
DA 39
LA
( I) POND AV
{ ■ o o A I Q 0' `■
I ,
b o (54
WOOD OR i
Y � ■
OAK t;RIDGE OR
O W,
OR ■
c r
1' �.o
• pRINGSIDE OR V
S SJ
1 � J
2
o INWO D ' q
r. 28N.R.22w
S. I I 1 S.12 • p�`L .AV
S. ♦ t — DAHI CT 7Z
� 13
' o
J rw
P T IMFJER
mP�IS CT
r"
IOH 74 ,
JL ■
74 4 •
r IE AV
NEM -Z ITZ AV
SOU-2 THCREST AV
y �
■
. 1
� o vei
•••ti,••.� ■ r ■�■� I� ■ ■ ■■�t ■ - Lake
68 O
ARV R AV
1. . 43
72
HEARING NOTIFICATION AREA
4� l
E
E'
•GALE
N/A
1.4
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction
of. street , storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water mains , elevated tank and
Pump station improvements on Sterling Street from Mailand Road to
Highwood Avenue, Schaller .Drive from Sterling Street to Jefferson
Fourth Addition and in Water Service District 8, City Project 86 -15, a
hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given
was duly held on May 21, 1987, and the council has heard all persons
desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MTNNESOTA as follows:
10 That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City
of Maplewood construct_ street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water
mains, elevated tank.and pump station improvements on Sterling Street
from Mailand Road to Highwood Avenue, Schaller Drive from Sterling
Street to Jefferson Fourth Addition and in Water Service District 8,
City Project 86 -15, as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and
orders the same to be made.
2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this
improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and
specifications for the making of said improvement.
April 30, 1987 _A
.Action by Council ..:
MEMORANDUM
Endorsed
To: Acting City Manager Kenneth Haider Modified.,
From: Chief of Police Kenneth U. Collins Rejected ,
Subject: Background Investigation Date
An extensive investigation has been done into the background of Thomas C.
Hopkins, who is the owner of and w i l l be doing business as Hoppy Rides
Again Liquor Store at 1347 Frost Avenue,
I am unable to find any reason that Mr. Hopkins should be denied an
off —sale liquor license by the City of Maplewood*
Mr. Hopkins has had experience in the liquor business, which included an
on —sale establishment known as Hoppy's Saloon in Hugo, Minnesota, from
1977 to 1980. Most recently he worked as daytime manager at the Fort
Road Liquor Store in St. Paul. It should be pointed out that Fort Road
Liquor Store i s owned by Mr. Hopkins' brother, W i l l i a m ,
During the times that Mr. Hopkins has been involved in the liquor business,
he has had only minor contacts with the police that did not result in any
arrests or complaints being issued.
I submit this for your review and handling.
KUC: j s
cc Liquor File
87- 004351
City Clerk
sp
t
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
APPLICATION FOR INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
nO APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE.
Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be
deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly.
In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: Fora Cor-
poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part-
nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership.
O
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED
1, h THOMA C. . HOPK INS OFFICER
as
as
(Individual owner, officer or partner)
for and in behalf of IIOPK INS LIQUORS OF MAPLEW0OD , INC.
hereby apply for an _ Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at
1347 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109
in the City of
(Give address and legal description)
Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No.
95 of Maplewood.
2. Give applicants' date of birth:
7th July 1951
(Day) (Month) (Year) .
S. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows:
2116 North -Barclay
Maplewood, AMN 55109
4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? Yes
If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio
If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner
Only one (1) Officer and that is Thomas C. Hopkins
5. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address
Single
6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years?
Spring 19b2 to Fall 1982 -- maint enance man - L & H Trucking Co.. Inc.
1982 to 1964 - maintenance man - City of Maplewood Parks & Recreation
Department .
1984 to 1987 - Liquor Store Man ager, Fort Road Liquor,
-
261 West 7th Street, St. Paul, MN 55102
7. If Partnership, state name and address of each partner. N/A
If a corporation, date of incorporatio 4- 7-8
state in
which incorpora Minnesota amount of authorized capitalization
25 shares $6,000.00
amount of paid in capi
If a subsidiary of any other corporation, so stat
give purpose of corporatio gen eral busin purposes
name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each:
Th C. Hopkins 2116 No rth Barclay Maplewood, ,MN 55105
(Name) -- (Address)
(City)
If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this
State? N A . Number of. certificate of authority
If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and
By -Laws.
8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? Main Floor
9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified?
. Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license?
Yes ,
10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school?
N_ State the approximate distance •
PP tance of the establishment from such school or churc
1 mile or more;Gladstone School, 4 blocks away, but no longer is
U-sed as .
11. State name and address of owner of building, John Miller, 1350 Frost Avenue,
Maplewood, 11N 55109
has owner of building any connection, directly or in-
directly, with applicant? No ,
12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? No
13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application
for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details
No
14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately
preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for
any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail No
15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years
were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or
N
under Federal L$ws, and if so, give date and details
16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the
municipality in which this license is to be issued? __N _. If so in what capacity?
17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture,
fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details
None
18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment
in the State of Minnesota? No Give name and address of such establishmen
19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer-
ence .
_ apl ewood State Bank --- Ila exooa. Mai.. —M rk Nn,1 t 2ki — lei - Of fi Cer
Ed Phillips & Sons Liquor Co. ( Marty Kouri) , 2345 Kennedy St. Mpls. ,:1iN
00 408
East Side Beverage Co. (Lonnie Kruge 1260 Grey Fox Rd., Ardens
.113.11s 104 55112-
20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner
which will expire December 31st of this year? Give umber of sa Applied for. and_
this application shall be supplemented when num is rece ve .
21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? Vo
22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on
the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam-
bling dOvIce and apparatus, %&' P Y gambling e e1 ermit an amblin th r ' No
..
23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive
from any other business establishment? Yes
24. State trade name to be used sloppy Ride Again Liquor Store
25. State na a of rson that will oper t sto e _ Thomas C. Hopkins, under the corporation
name % Liquors of ap�ewoo , --inc. -.-
26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number Applied for and sh all provide
when number is received.
27. If off sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? No___. If so,
state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year
28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is. being made, please
submit plans and specifications with this application. N/A
29. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows:
N/A
' t
80. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state-
ment of each partner. { SEE ATTACKED )
31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock-
tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other
pertinent data) . N/A
1.
82. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the
answer to No. 31 above N/A'
33. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State
of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations
promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and
I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions
are true of my own knowledge.
JEANNE SCHADT
140TARY Krj jC „_ MINNESOTA
RAMSRY COUNTY
MV C0 *xp#rei 12-22-W
(Signature of Applicant)
Subscri an swo this
..- day of -� I
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK
FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD. '
J
do ,
REPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT
This is to certify that the applicant, or his associates named herein have not been convicted with-
In the past live years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances
relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as hereinafter stated.
MAPLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Approved by:
Title.
REPORT ON PREMISES BY FIRE DEPARTMENT
This is to certify that the premises herein described have been inspected and that all Laws of the
State of Minnesota and Municipal Ordinances relating to Fire Protection have been complied with.
MAPLEWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Approved by:
Title.
APril 13 1987
To:
City or Maplewood,
Personal Financial Statement
Thomas Charles No
2116 Borth Barclay
Nap].ewood Ninn *so ta 55109
Total cash in accounts as Mapl State Bates do 0
19
Zbtal cash on hand
� 2
Total cash value - Life Insurance 5
Iffoua d Furnishings,
S 1
Clothing P er$onal Effec
S 4tOW*00
Mist ell an eouus I tems
1
1.97'8 Q.M. Ce Van C Conversion
Typ � 59000000
1976 Arti c 'Cat Showmobil, e
S 1 , 000000
19?4 Arti c Cat Snowmobile
. 800
Annual. Income - See Projected Yearly Statement tt c
A a h ed
2 0 947040
wwww�. �rwww+. rww .r�wwwww�wwwwrww�wwww�rw�r�r�►w wwrrw�. �„ �ww�„ ��. wr w�. wa�rww�r� ...rrwwwww...w�...i.... wwwww
Total
�r
72 9 2 7 0*00
*MOW r►�r►r w ww wr aft w w��w w w ww�w �.w w.w �r�www w wAw AM w ww� �rw w w www w w w�w� w� w w�ww w w w w w w r w.� w r� ww ww wr
Sign eds
Thomas c Hopkins
P.S. All Figures Caculatod To The Ntaurest One Hundred Dollars ( Above
Hopkins Liquor's Of MapleWOOd Inc. -. p Minnesota Corporation
Amount of Authorized Capitalization - 25 Shares
Itmount of Paid In Capita]]. - S 6,000.00
Present Total Personal C Includes Projected Yearly Statement ) $ 74270900
PreasMt Incorporation Zbtal S 6
Total
8 789270000
OWN"
ofs ;AIX
�or✓�it %d P�OJ�C��'b /
p �'i�iS�S �l�os !col �;���) �� /u'C?, Doo. �O
440
Ise
���
P�
Al
4w coMp.
Al
Sip dollp
0 W) 11 Oro
an e � L11
GPM 10
( o ttnL
0,0,09 oa
.3l0. -°
/Nod
� r,�rsS - x.300. �o
rofqL ��i�4e �'xp�iO4S — �3�i�, 130, o0
P o
Z,10, d 40 0 Jo
ViA
��R Oar ; �R/o
ONO 000 op ;w
/C rto ji� ; 1�� emu*
A L
Af /se jeXp4&1S6CS 0 * Or dp
do
/I��Y f. �l lb .fJ�n0. �0
rCef — x`300,
00
9s 0 00
�f�q�G A�isc. XAf11,61eej601?y - X 1,370. ��
j
0,06v/ / /!� �� /�(�o2U 'f� /c��000. �n
r � �i4KoFt fi b, 000. =° YV //fib � 000. ° —° 000. rn
O il
1
ISO# ° °i��.crrs�
IWO ss
,, � ��o,��`'/►/b " Oss PRn�;�'��/�, �DO, oo
/Soo
"l1/0f " ��,v(RiKi� C/{�ii�/{L �.Ca✓ �Nd) � D, / 0. a'
Mom.
ZaA e
it
ii d1b
i Oj 4cc tz�-6 ff &o f d 4 f 0
ti
Z e, &
c so�(:s C0 r f,�
!{nfy ;�f,E'R,�sf w/�Rfso� ✓,E'R , b;lra iA4o li ee. � � ,
i✓ !�n/ o f'/t,�iQ .Cigc�o�{ �'sigLtlis/����f W er4t
srqtA OAO Aj,1wtyerdtq I#t er4O 'P�{�IZA(�
t
� r 1
/T .� s' - •J �j .� - s • s 3 y
.�' �. �,1
. ...r.!►�.... .. N
`�•w�•. �i� it.•�i•W�M'.w.:�.S+•••'•..rA. :'•i•.s".•: r•.l�iM lr _ . ..:.,.• +Yu�.:.. .. .. .�.� .., .v• . ... , . .. •• .. .�... r
!{nfy ;�f,E'R,�sf w/�Rfso� ✓,E'R , b;lra iA4o li ee. � � ,
i✓ !�n/ o f'/t,�iQ .Cigc�o�{ �'sigLtlis/����f W er4t
srqtA OAO Aj,1wtyerdtq I#t er4O 'P�{�IZA(�
t
� r 1
/T .� s' - •J �j .� - s • s 3 y
7 Agenda Number
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Coun.ci.1.1
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant C Engineer Endorsed
SUBJECT : Meyer Street Wa ter .Mai n (Bush to M i nnehaha ) Mod i - I
City Project 87 -13 a
Feasibility Report Escrow Amount
Re�ec�te
DATE:
May 13, 1.987 date
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
On April 27, 1987 the city council followed the staff recommendation
and ordered a feasibility report on a water main on Meyer Street from
Bush to Minnehaha Avenues. The preparation of the report was
contingent upon the petitioners establishing an escrow amount of
$6,000 to guarantee feasibility report preparation costs. Past policy
of the city has been to require that developers escrow the preparation
cost of the feasibility report until the project is ordered. The
petitioners are five single- family homeowner's with no potential lot
splits. The petitioners have indicated that the escrow amount would
be difficult for them as property owners.
ALTERNATIVES
19 Allow the original resolution to stand and require the
petitioners to guarantee the feasibility preparation costs.
2. Revise the original resolution and waive the cash escrow
requirement.
DISCUSSION
The policy of the city was misinterpreted by staff in the original
resolution recommendation. Option One would therefore be contrary to
city policy. Option Two would allow the report to be prepared without
the cash escrow.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the council revise the original resolution and
waive the cash escrow requirement by passing the attached resolution.
3c
Attachment
WHEREAS, the council has previously ordered the preparation of. a
feasibility report on the construction of a water main along Meyer
Street between Bush and Minnehaha Avenues, City Project 87 -13,
contingent upon the petitioners of the project establishing an escrow
amount of $6,000 guaranteeing preparation costs, and
WHEREAS, city policy is to require the escrow amount for
potential developers only,
WHEREAS, the petitioners are single- family homeowners with no
potential lot splits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY. COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
.That said feasibility report for City Project 87 -13 shall be
prepared as originally proposed and the cash escrow amount of $6,00
guaranteeing preparation costs is hereby waived.
Action 13
Endorse
MEMORANDUM Modif 1 e
�eieete
Date
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Acting City Engineer
SUBJECT: Developer Project Financing and Construction
DATE: April 13, 1987
The staff over the past three months has been reviewing the procedures
for constructing and financing public improvements within developer
projects. The original review started with a petition from the
developer of the Budd Kolby Second Addition, Castle Design and
Development Company, Inc., requesting that the city install the plat's
internal utilities and streets at city expense and assess the costs
back to the property over a five-year period . The developer proposed
to post a letter of credit guaranteeing the first year's assessment
payment and agreed that each lot's assessment would be paid in full
prior to the lot being sold or transferred.
A meeting was held on January 15, 1987 with the city council, planning
commission and housing and redevelopment authority where the staff
presented a proposal that included two options for financing of the
internal improvements of development plats. Under both options it was
proposed that the city's engineering department would take the
responsibility for the utility and street design, bidding process,
hiring of a contractor, construction staking and construction
in as a method of working toward higher qua 1 i ty improvements,
The first financing option proposed as a "pay as you go" approach,
where the developer would provide a letter of credit equal to 150% of
the project cost estimate and the city would invoice the developer
monthly as costs were incurred. The second financing option proposed
was similar to that proposed by Castle Design. The. city would install
the improvements and assess the costs back to the property over a
five -year period with the developer providing a letter of credit
guaranteeing the first year's installment and agreeing to pay each
lot's assessment prior to transferring the lot.
The finance director indicated a possibility of a property tax
increase to cover bond payments should developers become delinquent on
assessment payments past the first year's installment. In response to
this concern, staff indicated a possibility of a three -year assessment
period and the developer's letter of credit being equal to 100% of the
entire three years' assessment, which would reduce the city's risk
factor to near zero. Input from some members of the council and
commissions indicated that this risk was minimal and that the city
should assume some risk to achieve a higher quality development.
The community development director proposed that with city financing
the developer should provide an above - average project, as defined by
the city council. Specific standards would be.established such as
15,000- square foot average lot area, more trees planted, dedication of
park land, etc. Certain members of the council and commission felt
that the minimum requirements as established by ordinance were
adequate and that city financing was not a large enough inducement to
include these specific standards. However, most members felt that the
city's financing should be offered only to established developers wit h
a proven "track record."
p
A second meeting on this subject was held on February 25, 1987 between
the staff and 15 of the city's current developers. The developers
were unani p mously opposed to Option One, the "pa as you o" financing
Y Y g g
approach. They indicated that the possibly slower time schedule,
increased cost and lack of control to stage platting and construction
made this option totally unworkable. The ability o proceed privately
Y p p tely
on a project was extremely important to some of the developers,
especially the larger firms. They felt that their ability .to make a
project profitable is tied directly to timing of the ro 'ect. The
" uick in - quick " p � •
q q out approach is necessary to their profit line
Option Two, the city assessed approach, was acceptable to the
developers. They did indicate some reluctance to the long ime
schedules however, felt h g
, that trading time for the financing approach
was a. good compromise. Questions were asked about a private approach
with city assessed financing. Staff indicated that the legality of
g Y
assessing without a low bid was very questionable and that if the city
offered the assessed approach, all engineering and contract
administration would be done under the direction of the city engineer,
Y g .
Since the February 25 developer meeting, we have continued to receive
input from the developers as well as meeting ith the city attorney
g Y Y
regarding legal options to the proposed approaches. The original
options as proposed were legally acceptable, however, the attorney
expressed problems with a system where the city prequalified engineers
and provided a list to the developers of firms who could perform
engineering services in Maplewood. He felt that with the state
license (the professional engineer registration) any engineer must be
allowed to perform private services within the city and any exclusion
by the city could be construed as a restraint of trade.
Based upon the input from the city council, planning commission,
housing and redevelopment authority, and the Maplewood developers, the
staff has concluded that Option One, a "pay as you go" approach, or
any modifications thereof, is probably not feasible for the developers
and thus would not be utilized. The construction quality issue
remains a problem, but will have to be addressed with additional time
and periodic inspection by the city's engineering department, or
th rough offering of a financing package ( Option Two) in which the city
has control over design, administration and inspection. Two options
are still proposed to be offered, however, Option One is the current
approach as allowed by the platting ordinance. Option Two is the city
financed, city constructed approach originally petitioned for by
Castle Design and Development.
The two options, as proposed, and the particular steps that will be
involved are as follows:
FA
Option one
This option is the current approach allowed by the platting ordinance.
The ordinance states that following preliminary plat approval and
prior to final plat approval the developer must arrange for the
.installation of all public utilities. The developer must either have
all the streets and utilities installed and: accepted by the city
engineer or must escrow 150% of the construction cost of the street
and utilities. All costs for engineering design, contract
administration, project inspection and city review and inspection are
borne by the developer.
There are no changes proposed to this approach. The construction and
engineering quality problem, where certain developer -hired consultants
are not producing the same high quality construction as the city's
engineering department or city -hired consultants, will be addressed
with the existing staff dedicating more review time and inspection
time to the lower quality work. The resulting increased time will be
billed to the developer in the usual manner. Conditional occupancy
permits for newly constructed homes will not be granted by the city
until the concrete curb and gutter and the first layer of bituminous
is installed.
Option Two
This option is similar to that petitioned by Castle Design and
Development. The particular steps involved in this process are as
follows:
Step 1: Developer submits a preliminary plat with preliminary grading
and utility plans as well as a legal petition requesting the city to
install the internal plat improvements.
Step 2: City council grants preliminary plat approval with conditions
for final plat approval. One of the conditions would be entering into
developer's agreement with surety equal to first year's installment of
five -year assessment for construction of the internal improvements.
Step 3: City engineer prepares an estimate of the total project cost
(25% for indirect costs) , the installments of a five -year assessment
and the cost to prepare plans and specifications and receive bids.
Step 4: Developer and city enter developer's agreement where city
agrees to prepare plans and specifications and developer establishes a
cash escrow account with the city equal to 125% of the cost to prepare
plans and specification-s.
Step 5: City council orders preparation of plans and specifications
by city engineer and authorizes receipt of bids. Low bid is used to
update total project cost estimate.
Step 6: Developer is allowed to cancel the project up to this time
with any funds in escrow account being refunded. Costs incurred to
date would be forfeited.
3
Note: It should be noted that. this process applies only when the plat
requires internal streets and utilities. The reasoning being that
when a petition is received signed by 100 percent of the landowners
(or in this option, the developer) , the council may order the
improvement and plans and spec i f icat i ons 'without a public hearing,
However, if off -site improvements are required and consideration is
given to assessing off -site benefited properties, then upon
preliminary plat approval, the developer's petition would be treated
as a public improvement petition and in place of the city engineer's
estimate of the total project cost and annual installments of
assessment, a feasibility report and public hearing would be
substituted.
Step 7: Developer and city would execute a new developer's agreement
where the city would agree to construct the project, assess the cost
over a five -year period and guarantee a date that conditional
occupancy permits would be allowed, while the developer would post a
letter of credit or cash escrow equal to the first year's installment
of the assessment.
Step 8: Upon receipt of the developer's letter of credit, the costs
for preparing the plans and specifications would be charged to the
assessable project costs and the original cash escrow and accrued
interest would be refunded to the developer.
Step 9: City council would hold the assesIsment hearing and levy the
assessment against the developer's property. Following the hearing,
if no appeals are filed, the city council, at the same meeting, would
award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder and
providing all preliminary plat conditions had been met, approve the
final plat.
Step 10: Developer could finalize project site rough grading
according to the approved grading plan and by the date agreed upon in
the developer's agreement in Step 7.
Step 11: City administers the construction and - i nspecti on of the
street and utility improvements.
Step 12: Following placement of the first 1 i f t of bituminous or at
the guaranteed date as established in the developer's agreement,
whichever is earlier, the city would begin approving conditional
occupancy permits for newly constructed dwellings provided they met
all inspection provisions.
The developer's agreement, in addition
costs if canceled by the developer and
first year's annual installment of the
each lot's assessment would be paid in
transferred plus would establish a date
would be based upon the following plat
plat approval,
to guaranteeing payment of city
guaranteeing payment of the
assessment, would state that
full prior to the lot being
of conditional occcupancy that
size and date of preliminary
4
1. Plat size - -2 - 20 lots; requesting August'l conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval October 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow) October 15
City receives bids January 15
Developer supplies letter of credit March l
Assessment hearing March 15
Final plat approved March 15
Rough grading- complete May 1
Construction start May 15
Conditional occupancy August 1
2. Plat size - -2 - 20 lots; requesting November 1 conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval January 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow) January 15
City receives bids - April 15
Developer supplies letter of credit June 1
Assessment hearing June 15
Final plat approval June 15
Rough grading complete August 1
Construction start August 15
Conditional occupancy November 1
3. Plat size - -20 - 80 lots; requesting September 1 conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval September 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow) September 15
City receives bid January 15
Developer supplies let.ter of credit March 1
Assessment hearing March 15
Final plat approval March 15
Rough grading complete May 1
Construction start May 15
Conditional occupancy September 1
4. Plat size - -20 - 80 lots; requesting November 1 conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval November 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow) November 15
City receives bid March 15
Developer supplies letter of credit May 1
Assessment hearing May 15
Final plat approval _ May 15
Rough grading complete July 1
Construction start July 15
Conditional occupancy November 1
5. Plat size -- greater than 80 lots:
Preliminary plat approval September 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow) September 15
5
City receives bid January 15
Developer supplies letter of credit March 1
Assessment hearing March 15
Final plat approval March 15
Rough grading complete May 1
Construction start May 15
Conditional occupancy November 1
60 Any preliminary plats receiving approval after January 1 or final
plats receiving approval after May 1 would not receive a guaranteed
date of conditional occupancy until the next year because assessments
could not be certified for collection if the hearings were held past
July.
IH
This option would require the
city to bond
for the project's cost.
it"
The dollar amount of developer
construction
for 1984,
1985 and 1986
has been estimated with ' indirect
costs of
28 %, which
assumes all
t;
easements are dedicated with
the plat, as
follows:
g
1984 Estimated Developer
Construction
Cost
$ 810,000
fr
Engineering, Fiscal and
Legal - -28%
230,000
I
`
1984 Total
$1,040,000
1985 Estimated Developer
Construction
Cost
$1,335,000
t�
Engineering, Fiscal and
Legal - -28%
375,000
1985 Total
$1,710,000
1986 Estimated Developer Construction Cost $1,590,000
Engineering, Fiscal and Legal - -28% 450,000
1986 Total - $2,040,000
Option Two staff comments:
The finance director has responded to the implication of this option
as follows: The proposed city financing of improvements could
increase the city's bonded indebtedness by 25°x. In addition, property
taxes would increase if the special assessments to finance the
improvements are not paid when due.
Regarding the increase in city bonded indebtedness, the 250 was based
upon the assumption that bonds would be sold annually for developer
projects equal to the average amount of the total developer
construction projects for the years 1984 through 1985. This amount
was calculated to be $1,600,000. If amount of five -year serial
bonds are sold annually, at the end of the fifth year the total amount
outstanding would be $4,800,000. The following table illustrates
this:
LA
Bonds Outstanding for Developer Projects
(000 Omitted)
Year
Bond Issue One Two Three Four Five
1
$1,600 $1,280 $ 960 $ 640
$ 320
2
1,600 1,280 960
640
3
- 1,600 1,280
960
4
1,600
1,280
5
1,600
As of December 31, 1986, the city's total bonded indebtedness is
$19,920,000. The additional $4,800,000 of bonds for developer
projects would increase the city's total bonded indebtedness by about
25 %. This change alone would not cause a decrease in.the city's
credit ratings with either Standard and Poors or Moody's Investors
Services. The reason is because the city's total debt now is at a
moderate level and because total debt is one of several factors that
determine our credit rating. However, if other factors changed to
make the city's credit rating a borderline case, the additional debt
could become a determining factor.
Regarding the possible property tax increase, this is based upon the
possibility of a developer not paying the annual installment on
special assessments after the first -year guarantee. Under current law,
nonhomestead property has three years to pay taxes and assessments.
If not paid by mid- August of the fourth year, the property owner would
lose title to the property. Thus, if a developer does not sell lots in
a new subdivision with city - financed improvements, the taxes and
assessments would probably become delinquent. Under the proposed
Option Two; the city could recoup the first year's assessment
installment but would be forced to levy property taxes to cover the
subsequent years' installments.
In the finance director's opinion, the biggest problem with Option Two
is the possibility of a property tax increase to cover delinquent
developer assessments. To eliminate the risk, the city could require
a letter of credit to guarantee all five years of special assessment
installments. However, a representative of First Minnesota Savings
Bank has indicated that it probably would be impossible to obtain a
letter of credit for a period greater than three years. Therefore,
consideration should be given to financing the public imppovements by
a three -year bond issue with special assessments levied over a
corresponding three -year period.
As discussed earlier, the risk factor involved with the scenario the
finance director elaborated on is probably quite low. Council, staff
and developers agreed that platted property with improvements
installed that could be purchased for the price of the final three or
four years of a five -year assessment (approximately 50% to 80% of
project cost) would be extremely attractive in any market. In
addition, it is anticipated that not all projects by developers will
7
use the city financing option thus reducing the city's projected
bonded indebtedness and allowing the city the flexibility to borrow to
pay bond costs should developer payments become delinquent, with the
costs for borrowing charged back to the property. A property tax
.increase under these circumstances is very unlikely.
Other Considerations
10. The following survey, conducted in 1985, shows the approach used
by other cities in the metro area:
Responsibility
Hire
City
Design
Contr.
In
F i nanc i ng
Columbia Heights
Dev.
Dev.
City
Dev. Agmt. (LOC)
Vadnais Heights
Dev.or
city
City
City
Dev. Bond (150 %)
Golden Valley
Dev? or
city
C i ty
City
5 -Year Assess, 3
Plymouth
Dev.or
city
Dev.or city
City
5 -year Assess.
Shoreview
Dev,
Dev,
Dev.
Dev. Agmt. (Bond)
Maple Grove
City
City
City
Assess. (LOC)3
Roseville
Dev, or
city
Dev, or city
City
Assess. (LOC) 3
N. St. Paul
City
City
City
5 -year Assess.
Crystal
Dev,
Dev,
Dev,
Dev. Agmt. (LOC II
Oakdale
Dev,
Dev.
Dev.
10 -Year Assess.
White Bear Lake
Dev.
Dev.
Dev,
10 -Year Assess.
Burnsville
Dev,
Dev.
Dev,
Dev, Agmt. (Bond)
Brooklyn Center
Dev.
Dev,
Dev,
Dev. Agmt. (Bond)
Fridley
City
City
City
Assess,
Woodbury
city
C i ty
City
5 -Year Assess . 3
1 LOC =
letter of
credit
required
2 Design
engineer
prequalified
by city
3 Surety
required
on assessment
29 The implementation of these options will not require an immediate
increase in city personnel. The increased workload in the engineering
department can be handled through the use of consultants. However, it
is anticipated that an additional engineering technician will be
requested again for the 1988 budget. This position was requested in
1987 to allow the department to apply additional time to noncharg eable
projects. Additional temporary employees to serve as project
inspectors may also be requested for the 1988 budget. The additional
technician and any temporary employees would be justified in the
budget through additional project billings.
39 As an example of the workings of this option, three recent
projects were analyzed as follows:
0
a.. Cave's,Lakewood Addition--City Project 85 -05
Project Construction Cost $263,500.00 ( assumed equal if
city had
constructed)
Indirect Costs at 25% = 65,875.00
Total. Project Cost ..$329,375000
Given: 34 lots; sold: 15 in 1985, 16 in 1986, 3 in 1987
Constructed in 1985; Assume May 1985 - Assessment interest
rate - 10%
Assessment per lot - $329,375 34 = $9,687.50
Five -Year Assessment Payment Plan
Yr. Principal Pri nc.Pymt. Int.Pymt. Payment
85 $329,375 $65,875 $54,896 $120,771
(escrow amt.)
86 263,500 65,875 26,350 92,225
87 197,625 65,875 19,763 85,638
88 131,750 65,875 13,175 79,050
89 65,875 65,875 6,588 72,463
Actual Payment With Lot Sales
Yr. Principal Lot Sale Prin.Pymt, Int.Pymt, Payment
85 $329,375 $145,313 $36,812 $35,521 $72,333
86 147,250 124,000 5,812 2,325 8,137
87 17,438 17 0 0 0
88 0 0 0 0 0
89 0 0 0 0 0
b. Carsgrove Meadows Additions I and II- -City Project 81 -13
Estimated Project Construction Cost = $750,000.00
Indirect @ 25% = 187,200.00
Esimated project.cost $937,200.00
Given: 88 lots; sold: 10 in 82, 12 in 83, 10 in 84, 10 in
85, 15 in 86; in 1982; Assume May 1982 -
Assessment Interest Rate 10 %.
Assessment per lot = $937,200 88 = $10,650
9
Five -Year Assessment Payment Plan
Yr.
Principal
Prin, Pymt.
Int. Pymt.
Payment
82
$937,200
$187,440
$156,200
.$343,640
.(escrow amt.)
83
749,760
187,440
74,976
262,416
84
562 , 320
187
56
243,672
85
3741880
187
37,488
224,928
86
187 , 440
187,44-0 .
18,744
206,184
Actual Payment With Lot Sales
Yr.
Principal
Lot Sale Yr1y.Pra Prin.Pymt.
Int.Pym Payment
82
$937,200
$106,500 $830,700
$166,140
$138,450 $304,590
83
664,560
102,240 562,320
140,580
56,232 196,812
84
421,740
63,900 357,840
119,280
35,784 155,064
85
238,560
42,600 195,960
97,980
19,596 117,576
86
97,980
31,950 66,030
66,030
6,603 72,633
c.
Crestview
Third Addition- -City
Project 85 -22
Water, Sewer and Street Cost =
$237,899.20
Indirect @
25% =
59,475.80
Estimate Project Cost
$297,375.00
Given: 39
lots; assumed sales:
12 in 86,
12 in 87, 12 in
88, 3 in 89;
Construction in 1986; Assume May 1986 -
Assessment
With 10% Interest Rate.
Assessment
per lot = $297,375
39 = $7,625
Five -Year Assessment Plan -
Yr.
Principal
Prin. Pymt.
Int. Pymt.
Payment
86
$297,375
$59,475
$49,563
$109,038
(escrow amt.)
87
237,900
59,475
23,790
83,265
88
178,425
59,475
17,843
77,318
89
118,950
59,475
11,895
71,370
90
59,475
59,475
5,948
65,423
Actual Payment With Lot Sales
Yr.
Principal
Lot Sale Yrly.Prin, Prin.Pymt,
Int.Pymt. Payment
86
$297,375
$91,500 .$205 , 875
$41,175
$34 $75
87
164,700
73,200 91,500
22,875
9 32,025
88
68,625
54,900 13
4,575
1 5,948
89
9
9,150 0
0
0 0
90
0
0 0
0
0 0
10
Summary
1. A three -month review by staff on construction and financing
procedures on developer projects revealed that a "pay as you go"
approach was not feasible for the developers due to higher costs from
city restrictions and time delays within the city's administration of
projects.
_20 The developers, especially the larger firms, indicated that
private construction is extremely important to their business approach
and removing that option would force them to review their development
in Maplewood.
30 option One is the current approach (privately administered)
allowed by the platting ordinance with no revisions. Under the
ordinance the developer must either have all the streets and utilities
installed and accepted by the city engineer or must escrow 150% of the
construction cost of the street and utilities to guarantee the
construction.
4. Option Two is a twelve -step approach in which the city prepares
the plans and specifications, administers and inspects the project and
assesses the project costs against the property over five years.
5. Option Two requires a set timetable dependent upon the size of
the plat. The conditional occupancy permit date will be guaranteed to
be issued by the city if the developer meets all conditions.
6. The finance director indicated that the increase in the city's
total bond indebtedness if all projects were bonded for would not
cause a decrease in the city's credit rating because total debt is one
of several factors that determine our credit rating.
70 The possibility of a property tax increase to cover bond payments
should developers become delinquent on assessment payments past the
first year's guaranteed installment is considered minimal due to the
saleability of a platted subdivision with all improvements installed
and at least 20% of the cost paid.
8* A 1985 survey of fifteen suburban communities showed that nine
have procedures for assessing developer project improvements back to
the property.
94, An increase in city personnel is not required to implement the
proposed changes. The increased workload could be handled through the
use of consultants.
Recommendation
1. The current approach to developer project construction and
financing on a private basis should be retained.
2e A second option to the private construction and financing should
be offered as a method of addressing quality problems in developer
financed improvements. This second option should be a city -
administered, city - financed approach.
11
30 The city- administered approach should include *city responsibility
for plan and specification preparation, receipt of bids, levy of
assessment, construction administration and construction inspection.
40 The options should be administered and timetables adhered to as
outlined in this report.
50 If the council agrees with this change in policy, the staff
should be directed to draft a revision to the platting ordinance and
begin procedures for adopting the revised ordinance,
jc
cc: Acting City
Manager
Finance Director
Director of
Community Development
Director of
Parks
City Clerk
Engineering
Techs
Associate Planners
Developers
12
1
f
I `
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner
.SUBJECT: Billboard Lease Renewal
LOCATION County Road D and the BN Tracks
APPLICANT: Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
OWNER: City of Maplewood
DA TE: May 4, 1987
SUMMARY
Request
b Cour
Erg , ,:1 cr s 6;d
e
Y
e ' � e�:te
Date
Renewal of a lease to permit a Naegele billboard on city property for
ten years. Refer to the attached letter, lease and maps.
Comments
This billboard is a legal nonconforming sign. It does not comply with
P
all of the requirements of the billboard ordinance. The sign i s
located on property zoned R -3, multiple dwelling residential, which is
not a permitted zoning district for billboards. Also, it is 1,160
feet from another billboard. Code requires a minimum spacing of 2,300
feet between billboards unless a conditional use ermit is approved,
P PP
Recommendation
venial of the request for the renewal of a billboard lease at the
southeast corner of I -694 and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks.
Denial is based on the finding that the billboard does not comply with
P
the city's sign code and should be removed.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Lot area: 4.19 acres
Existing land use: a storm water holding •
g p nd and a Naegele billboard
Surrounding Land .Uses
Northerly: I -694
Southerly: County Road D
Easterly: a dwelling on a large lot zoned R-
dwelling residential 3, multiple
Westerly: Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way
g y
Past Actions
8- 24 -71:
The original billboard lease (a 15 -year lease ) was e •
entered into with
Clarence 09 Labathe, the previous owner.
3- 26 -76:
The subject property was obtained by the City f Maplewood as
Y P a result
of condemnation proceedings in Ramsey County District Court
date January 28 1976 (court
PLANNING. CONSIDERATIONS
10 Section 36-292 (a) of city code states that "billboards
may only
be located in the following zoning districts: SC shopping pp g center,
BC, business commercial, M -1, light manufacturin g and heavy
manufacturing zones."
2. The property is zoned R -3, multiple dwelling.
9
3. Section 36 -292 (c) states:
"Billboards shall not be located closer than the following
distances, unless the council
approves a special use permit:
(1) Two thousand three hundred (2,300) feet to another
billboard on the same side of the same street.
. VV
Attachments:
10 Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Applicant's Letter
4 Proposed Lease
2
�/
9F
j
(6c) kna) IL
BC .8, r
B C C R 2
M I
L B C T • Ml BC e<
BC Ci F
L C j HEAM
14
a C
A2
F R
R 3
PUD
LAX .1 R2)
• or ��AC F F R- 3C
R I z
P u r
COW Y R
• a5 •
R
• F
R
Ml t j
I:p
�Fr Ca
sc
Ml Ml
F
ul
L:
(R2)
F
F
L A
173 F
R
ROAD C' P U
Fj
PUD F IR C •
Ml K 2 R F
J FL4,F141 L R
UEW)NT 4�
• L
LBC
LAYL-1 9 (; I
R F
C 0 Awb= qA_ R C13 & -- __ _. _...__..� 0
fWTANT _.AVF
Ml R F
LOC
R
R
M 1 —71
Ml
M I
TRUN►( - -- `__ �
' WAY
SHER AVEI
C IA!
Ml
A * Ml
r
POD R2f
Rl
D
LL&__TAW___l AVE
A
R
k4
%lk
R2
4
............... .
03
W -94f4
n
F
L
R ��-� 1 f I �
LR-3c '=71
Q U�9
.._
66
X
LB0
R
C f R
R
R
8C
F
LOCATION MAP
3 Attachment 1
4
r"1 •
•
• - -_ - it -' C7 V E R K L C Z e 4 4
r• - �, 3
C/) , o - r. s 4 ,
q
LL �
GO
RD. i f
2 j I
2.37
oil
3 411
fu
IL
WOE ti.
ji ft 4.&A
4
2L All!
�: s4 1 0 � e �rr�•
. y c lT y OF MAPLE o0O N� a Y' i G Ir1 ,
.• ._... - � � 080 � 044 i
_ ,� _ • ,_- V% 1%
t . (3) ( AmNE 2C0 ,
• .ma y .
To 4 74
• / R3
M A P LE- WOOL
,
/l 4 -16 74
w -
- - � s� ■ ��� � • -- - ■ s s ■ ■ � � --s � s - s -sue i •-
�/
c-- �..
R L E f•
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q
4 Attachment 2
EGEL__ E
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
of the Twin Cities
.February 26, 1987
Mayor John Greavu
City . of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mayor Greavu and Members of the City Council:
The enclosed lease, prepared by Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company,
will extend our use of City owned property on I -694 east of the
Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way. This new lease replaces
our former lease which expired in November of 1986. The lease
provides for payments to the City of $600.00 per year over its ten
year life. These terms are comparable to those offered and accepted
for this type of outdoor advertising display in this area.
We propose no physical change to the unit, it will remain as it was
built in 1970. Our continued use of the parcel has not and does
not interfere with the public purpose of the parcel, providing for
stormwater runoff,
We respectfully request the Council direct the City Staff to enter
into an agreement extending our use of this property.
I will be attending the .,.4987 City Council Meeting and will
be able to answer questions and respond to comments.
If you have any questions or comments prior to that time P l ease call
me at Naegele, 869 - 1900, Extension 222.
Thank you!
Sincerely,
Roger T. Loe
Real Estate Services
RTL /emo
Enclosure
cc: Thomas Ekstrand
City of Maplewood
1700 West 78th Street • Minneapolis, MN 55423.612/869 -19(X)
Zapnet: 612 - 869 -3897
5 Attachment 3
i'i!" ` • ' '+M!t.�. � t!�+•....lsan.V.w;. nl.w .s . _: - .r - f.,� v.. - • - 1k:rw:. - • , �, ....:.. *CK V 01 W - .� .. �• ..�.
to s ..
Lease No. 09494
LEASE AGREEMENT
Agreement made February 9 19 87, by and between
City of Maplewood t "lessor ") , and Naegele Du '
aegel eeDu r 1d vd erti si ng,
I nc. essee
1. Premises The Lessor, as owner or agent of - the owner, of the following
premises:
Street Address: S/S I694 E/0 B.N.R.R.
City of Town: a ewoo
Legal Description: See ac a xhibi - �'—
in the County /PAuceaix of Ramse State of Minnesota ,
doe hereby lease and gran t exclusively to the" lessee that porti on� premises
necessary to construct (1 ) outdoor advertising structure w with sufficient access to
allow Lessee to service and maintain such structure(s).
2. Term. Thi lease shall be for a term of ( 10) years beginning on n d irimrcccc
Q*)W i U KPAIN)WX March 15 , 1987 whr �o xocxmt4 o txxxxk)ettal&xxxxxx
Owl tx*hocxxx erxiccngc*bot *hecxxxxx
t wec�c cXk)4x
Year1` rental shall be
3. Rental, y Six Hundred and No / - - - - --
($ 600.00_ -_-) Do11 ars payable a cb�x�r year y rom �.he�� ce of Lessee.
Lvw= '
ledgm &x* x&xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx�cacxci� � cXfArkAM x
' �ocbcxlbdxic�cxka�ccx�txisxx�dxackk - -- - cxU9djcxd lxxgd6cxrx9d"x�cIC
&WWx
OdX' cx*Wxk* ckk c p�cki cx c�x�c��k ��
oC&Ad=X)63=.
4. Property. As between Lessor and Lessee all structures, equipment and
materials the premises shall remain the property of Lessee and Lessee
is granted the rightto remove same from Lessor's premises within a reasonable period
of time after the expiration of this Lease or any renewal thereof.
,5. Hold Harmless. Lessee shall save the Lessor harmless from all damage to
persons or property by reason of accidents resulting from the negligent acts of its
agents, employees or others employed in the construction, maintenance, repair or
removal of its signs on the premises.
6 xxbrx*mx weoUx*xxxxk KxWx- xxxxxxcoaaeod 4xmx free xxxle(Axxxcxxxx
xageaW i xbeCAA)d'E cxbeWWXkXX xwxk c*weycAxxxgoec)egrAKXXAXXX oAcXxxxxxlxrnry x x xx
�x �dt�ec �c�erc�eet�cb�c�o�c�taec�oorxieaac�emc�orx�c�bud�cx��ecot�cx�c�xix ,c�dxxxxx
)ckmxWx)M)Ex x)tfcM)ec w)d(A)e0000xxxy)emAxxtobt�cxxxxxxx
7. Cancellation of Lease. Lessee If the view of the premises or advertising
sign or signs er ected�tFe - Fe - 6 *is partially or wholly obstructed, or their advertising
value impaired or diminished by reduced vehicular circulation, or the use of such
signs is prevented or restricted by law, the Lessee may immediately, at its option,
cancel this lease and receive all rent paid for the unexpired term hereof, by giving
the Lessor notice in writing of such obstruction, impairment, prevention or
restriction of use.
8. Lessor's Representations. Unless specifically stated otherwise herein, the
Lessor represenEs and warrants that Lessor is either the owner or the agent of the
owner of the premises above described, has full authority to make this lease and
covenants that Lessor will not permit any adjoining premises owned or controlled by
Lessor, to be used for advertising purposes or permit Lessee's signs to be obstructed.
In the event of any transfer of Lessor's interest in the above described premises,
Lessor agrees to promptly give Lessee notice of such transfer to deliver to Lessor's
transferee written notice of the existence of this lease and a copy thereof.
9. Entire Agreement. It is expressly understood that neither the Lessor nor the
i
Lessee s oun y any s - tipulations, representations or agreements not printed or
written in this lease. This lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon
the personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto, provided
however that this lease shall not be binding upon any secured party until delivery of
written notice to the parties hereto by such secured party.
10. Miscellaneous.
Accepted this day of
LESSEE: Approved by:
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
By:
its GeneraTW6i er `-'—"
Agent of Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
By •
Its Leasing - Agent - --
, l9--.
LESSOR:
(PrFi nt Name j - -_- - -- -. - - - --- - - - _ - --
('Signature)
• __ -__ 1830 East County Road - B
Maplewoo M 55109
Social Security of Fed. IDN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT " A "
That part of Section 34 Township
p 30 N, Range 22W, according to the U.S.
Government Survey thereof, lyin south of Truck Hwy •
follows g y #694 described as
.That part of the SE 1/4 - SW 1/4, •
I , Secti on 34, lying east of the
right of way line of Burlington - Northern ail
-west 400 feet of the Inc., � Way. and the
e SE 1/4 -.SE 1/4, Section 34, containing
4.48 acres more or less,
7
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson
SUBJECT: HRA Annual Report
DATE: April 29, 1987
Act by Council
Endorse
Modif i e r7�.�.0,.�.
Rejected....,,
Dat
The HRA's annual report is enclosed for council's acceptance.
Recommendation
Accept the HRA's annual report for March 1986 through February 1987.
mb
Encl.
CITY O F
IL MAPLEWO.OD
1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD Ii MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
WEWOOD H0U5ING ffh07 AlRfiOtITY
770 -4560
April 7, 1987
City Council
Maplewood City Hall
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, NN 55109
HRA 1986-7 AMNM REPORT
The following is the Map I ewood Housing and Redevelopment 1 ment Auto
g oP h rity s
Annual Report for the period March 1986 through February A c of
the attendance report is - � copy
• p enclosed as Exhibit A (page 4) . The member a -
pointed in 1986 (Clemence Kwa i.ck of the H P
•P Hu Relations Commission) has
not been able to attend meet i.ngs , and the HRC is in the ro cess
tin the name P of submit
g e of a replacement for him.
Program Participation
During the year we participated in three prog administered b th
Metro HRA and � - Y e
f administered by local lenders (Exhibits B and C es
5 thru 8) . Through h these p pages
g p grams 50 3 units have received rental assist-
ance , and loans were made to 11 households, We have no explanation wh
' sec � Y
the number of existing tion .8 assisted households .has draped from 169
to 140 over the past 3 years (Exhibit C, page 7
g ).
Housin& and Planning Items Considered
As you can see from Exhibit D (page 9), compared to past ears this a
slow � P years, has
been a
_ 1 year, with only four meetings. We have discussed hous
needs and opportunities for older adult d
• is with a group of experts, and
the effect of 1986 Federal tax legislation on housing development with g p h the
city bond counsel. We met jointly with the City Council and Planning -
mission in January regarding the financing of residential streets and
utilities --a -a matter we again discussed at our February . g F ruary meeting, along
with the Ramsey County Housing Assistance Plan (HAP),
In addition to the above, Canmi.ssinners Carlson and Fischer
have served
on the Home Share Task Force Commission Home Share has applied for
$7 of CDBG money • �
• n y from Ramsey County to assist in funding next ear's
p rogram. Con ni ss i.oner Fischer is also Y
P o serving on the Ramsey County I.nng -
Term Care Work Group and on the Living at Home Advisory Canmit tee $
19 8 6 - 7 HRA kmual Report - cont inued
Items of Concern
Page 2
Two items of concern noted for the last two years continue to plague us,,
The first is the lack of resolution of the complaints registered with the
Council b area housing contractors regarding the effect of the city's de-
ve lopment standards on the cost of housing in the city . The second is the
continuing erosion in the number of acres of land in the city available for
RM and RH development. While our goals state we will plan for . the necessary
mix of units for life -cycle housing , our current land use practices seem to
be heading us away from a realization of these goals. Further egos i.on of
areas P lanned for RM and RH use may seriously impair our ability to achieve
these units,
At the present time it appears that we will be able to meet our 1980 to
1990 regional fair-share goals for the production -of modest cost and low/
moderate income housing. This is primarily due to tax - exempt financing
(Exhibit , P a E and whether we can continue this pace with the changes
� 10 �
in the law remains to be seen. _
1987 Work Program
1,
Appointment of a fifth member to bring our commission to full strength,
2. Continue to participate in the Metro BRA and State NHFA programs,
3. Continue to facilitate cooperation between the City Council and area
developers to resolve complaints that Maplewood's development requirements
are overly restrictive.
4. Attempt to ascertain why the continued decline in the number of house-
holds assisted by the Section 8 Existing Housing program.
5. Continue to review ordinance /policies relating to housing housing costs
6. Encourage and facilitate the provision of life -cycle housing, and con -
tinue to work toward the establishment of alternative housing options for
the city's older -adult population* These efforts are to include, but not
Y P�? rim
be limited to, participation in the Older Adult Home-Share Steering Commis -
s i on and on the Metro Council's long-term care student group , as well as
evaluating the need for senior group homes,
7. Asa ppP appropriate, seek out partnerships with local lending institutions
to deliver home improvement and home loan programs at no expense to the
city other than normal up - front staff t ime .
8. Monitor any subsidize housing proposals for consistency with the
housing plan and the guidelines for tax-exempt financing.
9 Keep members informed on current trends and changes that will influence
the provision o f affordable housing.
10. Utilize Maplewood in Motion, the Maplewood Review and the Northeast • Area
Section, and o f availability
sewer bill inserts to keep. the public aware
the y
of various housing- related programs and developments.
1986-7 HRA Annual Report - continued Page 3
I10 Revise the housing section of the comprehensive plan to reflect current
programs, housing needs and conditions,
12. Be alert to possible blighted areas. and work on solutions to these
problems if they occur,
13. Hold a joint meeting with the city council to review the year's
performance and outline a work program for the coming year.
Comrmic ation with the Council
As in the past. we will attempt to keep current on what is happening in
the -field of housing, and actively pursue ways. to facilitate affordable
housing in our city, in accordance with the conprehens ive plan. If at any
time it is felt that additional input or guidance from the council is de-
sirable for the proper functioning of the HRA, a request for a shirt-sleeve
session or a presentation under the "Visitor Presentation" item on your
agenda will be made
o-
LORRAINE FI SCHER
Chairman
Maplewood Haus ing and Redevelopment Authority
ATTENDANCE
4
Commis
Carlson
Connelly
Fischer
Kwapick
Schmit
10/14/86 11/18/86 1/15/87 2/10
(HRA /PC /CC)
x x x x
x x x x
X X X X
x
X X
4
EXHIBIT A
HRA
COMMISSIONERS
Name
Appointed
Term Ex Tres
Dale Carlson
1/84
3/88
/ 8
1890 Barclay (55109)
Thomas Connelly
1/84 3/85 /
3/90
1193 E.. County Road B (55109 )
Lorraine Fischer
4/75, 3/81,3/86
3/91
1812 North Furness (55109)
Clemence Kwapick
1/86
3/89
773 Bellwood Avenue
(HRA /HRC Liaison)
Greg Schmit .
3/82, 3/87
3/92
2369 Linwood (55119)
ATTENDANCE
4
Commis
Carlson
Connelly
Fischer
Kwapick
Schmit
10/14/86 11/18/86 1/15/87 2/10
(HRA /PC /CC)
x x x x
x x x x
X X X X
x
X X
4
EXHIBIT B
ACTIVE HOUSING PROGRAMS IN MAPLEWOOD
1. Administered by Metropolitan Council HRA
a. Rehabilitation Loan Program—Owner-occupied F
P ( by MHFA) :
Two loan applications pending (12 -15 -86
Maximum.loan amount per application:
$7,500
Households with an adjusted annual income of $7,000 or less are
eligible for this assistance. The
e program offers. 3� interest
and deferred payment loans A' loan may be total
. dependent applicant's 1y or partially
deferred, de
p upon an applicant s income and ability to
pay.
The purpose of this loan program is to assist eligible
their home lglble applicants
in repairing s to correct deficiencies directly Y
affecting safety, habitability, 9Y usage and, handicap
accessibility. The maximum grant amount available is
applicant. $ 7 ,500 per
Location of Dwellings:
1700 block of Edgerton Street
500 block of Ferndale
b. Section 8 and Section 236 Rental Subsid
HUD) : y Programs (Funded by
Eligible tenants pay a maximum of them •
Y percent of their gross
income toward the monthly rent payment. The difference between
the tenant's affordable rent and the total •
rent is the Section 8
subsidy paid to the landlord. In December
1986, 503 Maplewood
households (201 senior and 302 family) ere '
Y) receiving rental
assistance* See Exhibit D for the income and rent limi
2. Administered by Local Lenders
a. Home Improvement Loan Program (Funded b MHFA -
Y )•
Phase 12, ,June 86 to present - -2 loans totalling $14,950)
Average -- $7,475 per applicant
Households with an adjusted annual income of $27,000 or less may
be eligible for home improvement loans of u to 1
p $ 5,000• Loan
interest rates of between 3 and 9 percent are set dependent upon
the borrower's income. P p
b. Home Energy Loan - Program (Funded b MHFA •
Y )-
Phase 3 -- August 1985 to March 1986
7 loans -- $19,555
Average -- $2,794
5
Homeowners with incomes above $24,00 could be eligible for loans
at 9 percent interest rate; with incomes of $24,000 or below they
could be eligible for loans at 8 percent. Loans of $1,000 to
$5,000 were available for energy efficiency - related improvements
only, under this program.
c. MHFA Home Mortgage Loan Program (funded by MHFA):
- This program is for first -time home buyers. To qualify, an
.applicant s adjusted gross household income cannot exceed $35,000
. for a new - dwelling unit or $31,000 for an existing- dwelling unit.
The mortgage money is available for purchase of single- family
units, townhomes, condominiums, or existing duplexes.
1986 program - -No mortgages purchased for property in Maplewood.
d. Housing Assistance Fund (Funded by Legislature)
Through this program,, qualifying lower- income MHFA home mortgage
recipients could receive downpayments and monthly payment
assistance. No loans were purchased for property in Maplewood
during 1986,
0
EXHIBIT C
Section 8 and Section 236 Rental Assistance
EXISTING UNITS (Section 8)
MArcher Heights has 121 Section ection 8. units, 33 Section 236 units and
14 market units. Section 8 and 236 rent and income uid ellnes are
the same* ( See next page.)
g
( total of 63 units, eight of which h are .market rate.
WA total of 6 units, two of which
are market rate
MA total of � •
68 seniors units, four of which are market rate.
7
Household Types
Unit Type:
Family Elderly
Total
otal
One bedroom
4 13
17
Two bedroom
116
116
Three bedroom
__
6
Four bedroom
1 --
1
127 13
140
Of the 140 units,
127 are in multiple
dwellings,
P gs, three are
'
in double
dwellings and four
i
are n single
dwellings.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
(Section 8 and
Section 236 -- Archer H ��
He
Family Units
Unit Type:
Archer Heights
Lundgren Maple Knolls
Total
One bedroom
30
3
33
Two bedroom
55{2)
13 2
3
100
Three bedroom
4(
16 20
40
Handicap
_
_ 2
2
89
29 57
175
-
Elderly Units
Unit Type:
Archer Heights
Concordia Arms
Total
One bedroom
64(
124
188
MArcher Heights has 121 Section ection 8. units, 33 Section 236 units and
14 market units. Section 8 and 236 rent and income uid ellnes are
the same* ( See next page.)
g
( total of 63 units, eight of which h are .market rate.
WA total of 6 units, two of which
are market rate
MA total of � •
68 seniors units, four of which are market rate.
7
EXHIBIT C. (Continued)
Section 8 and Section 236 Income and Rent Ceilings
Household Size Maximum Annual Gross
ss Family Income
(persons) --
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 or more
Unit Type
One bedroom
Two bedroom
*Includes utilities
Maximum Allowable Rent*
$405 /month
$480 /month
$12,300
14,050
15,800
17 , 550
18,950
20,350
21,750
23,150
E:3
EXHIBIT D
HOUSING AND PLANNING PROPOSALS CONSIDERED
Meeting Date Item
10 -14 -86 Housing needs and opportunities
older adults -- discussion with
group of experts
11 -18 -86
1 -15 -87
2 -10 -87
Action Taken
Accepted study
objectives to
evaluate the concept
of older -adult group
homes.
1. Effect of 1986 Federal tax
Discussion with city
legislation on housing
bond counsel
development
2. Income certification require-
ments for tax - exempt
None
financing
3. Work program for. 1987
Accepted
Joint meeting with the planning
commission and city council
None
regarding the financing of
residential development
1. Archer Heights
No action
2. Public financing for resi-
Accepted concept
P
dential streets and utilities
No concessions
required.
3. Annual report exhibits
Accepted
4. Ramsey County HAP
No action
5. Older adult group home study
No action
0
EXHIBIT E
Rental Housing Developed with
Tax- Exempt Financing
SECTION 1
-
No. of
Occul2acy
Project Name
Units
1986
Maple Ridge Apts,
100
Co. Rd. B east of
Hazelwood
1986
Silver Ridge Apts,
186
Stillwater Rd. and
Stillwater Avenue
1987
Century Ridge Apts.
75
Century Avenue, south
of Battle Creek
1987
Hazel Ridge Seniors Apts,
75
2730 Hazelwood
(Construction
start proposed
for 1987)
Beaver Creek
180
Ivy Avenue and Ferndale
Street
Handicap Amount of
Units Bond Issue
5 $ 3.8*
8 4.8*
3 3.75*
3 4.0*
9 8.5*
TOTAL . 616 - 28 $24.85
*Subject to pre -1986 federal tax - exempt financing requirements
(See next page.)
10
EXHIBIT E (Continued)
SECTION 2
Federal Tax- Exempt Financing Restrictions
1-0 Bond Issues Prior to 1 -1 -86:
- 20% of units must be occupied by housholds with adjusted
gross income of 80% le of the area median ($28,080 in
1986).*
Households of one to four persons all were subject to the same
household income requirement.
One -time income certification for each household. Once certi-
fied, a household could remain and be counted as low - income
household even if income increased about the maximum.
Complaince with these rules was required for ten years.
No state bond issue volume cap for multiple- family housing.
-,Cost of issuance could not exceed 3% of the issue.
2. Bond Issues After 12- 31 -85:
20% of units must be occupied by households with adjusted
gross incomes 50% or less of the area median or 40% of the
units must be occupied by households with adjusted gross
incomes 60% or less of the area median.*
The city elects which of the above tests it wants, dependent
upon its housing needs. This decision cannot be changed.
An income adjustment is required for household size.
Maximum allowable rent cannot exceed 30% of the annual low -
income ceiling for the units subject to the quotas,
Compliance with these rules is required for fifteen years.
A state bonding volume cap applies to all residential bond
issues. All issues are subject to state -wide competition.
Cost of issuance cannot exceed 2% of the issue (SFD under $20M
am 3.5 %, over $20M - 2 %)
*Adjusted gross income is calculated by subtracting $750 for each
adult and $500 for each child from a household's gross income. This
income ceiling is periodically evaluated by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD).
11
EXHIBIT E (Continued)
SECTION 3
In June 1986, the city revised its requirements for approval o t financing. Pp f tax -
exem
p i. ng . HRA Commissioners Connelly and Schmi t Vere among
the members of the committee that developed these revisions.
Additions to the previous requirements included the following:
1. Provisions for the residence and wages of the construction
g onstruction
workers.
2. A requirement that these projects must significantly exceed
minimum code requirements. The following sixteen design g g upgrade
options were identified from which at least eight must be included in
a project:
Brick
Building design- should be a distinctive, nongeneric style with
meaningful details. _
A noticeable increase in the size and quantity f landscape
e p
plantings over what is normally required.
Underground irrigation of all landscaping.
Usable open space provided above code minimums
Electrical outlets adjacent to at least half the parking
stalls for car heaters.
- A children's play area.
- Deadbolt locks.
Security system.
Swimming pool, tennis court, indoor multi- activity room or
outdoor multi- activity building.
At least 10% more parking spaces or garages than code requires,
g q es.
Underground parking or parking under the dwelling unit.
Setbacks above code minimums.
Floor areas above code minimums.
- All parking stall widths at least ten feet.
Recreational walkways or sidewalk.
12
1 -3
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
TO: City Council
Endorse
FROM: Planning Commission Modifie
SUBJECT: Annual Report Re j ecte
DATE: April 28, 1987 Date
The Planning commission's annual report consists of three P arts: the
.comprehensive plan, 1987 work program and attendance record.
I. Comprehensive Plan
Section 25 -2.3 ( 5 ) of city code states that one of the duties of
the planning commission is: "to review, prepare and make report
to the city council by December thirty -first of each year
regarding the city comprehensive plan, along with recommendations
for changes which the commission may deem desirable."
Our main concern with the comprehensive plan is to get approval
from the Metropolitan Council of the revisions to the density
conversion table. Met Council is holding this up until the city
completes its sewer plan. our engineering department should be
requested to give this highest priority.
The comprehensive plan should be significantly reduced in size so
it is easier to use. This may require a consultant, due to lack
of staff time.
II. Work Program
A memo was sent to the council and planning commission requesting
suggestions for a 1987 work program. Three replies were
received. The commission reviewed all suggestions and ranked
them in three categories:
1st Priorit - -ver im ortant, should be done soon
1. Refer to the city manager's office:
a. Improve neighborhood and city identity and communi-
cations
More signs
Park days (one day per park)
Publicize a map of the park
Survey residents to see if they want Maplewood post
office
Is there a downtown?
Publicize the neighborhood maps
-Update Maplewood's population on highway signs
- Move city signs on boundary streets
Lobby to get the new county library headquarters in
in Maplewood
Large colored city map in city hall lobby with
community facilities and pending developments
Informational handouts in the city hall lobby with
information on city activities and operations
A city hall bulletin board
More information on city activities and. operations
in the - Maplewood in Motion; possibly routine
surveys
- Cable TV coverage of council and commission
meetings
b. Do a study with the Met Council on.why Maplewood's
taxes are so high, with a high level of commercial
development.
2. Continue planning for streets on undeveloped property before
a developer comes in.
3. Springtime- -plan outings for council, staff and commissions
to review sites.
40 Get Met Council approval of the density conversion table.
5. Continue study on changing assessment policies for new
development.
2nd Priority -- important, but no rush
10 Edit and reduce the size of the comprehensive plan and
follow -up with appropriate rezonings.
2. Review permitted uses in each zoning district.
3rd Priority -- desirable, do when there is time
Form an economic development commission to:
1. Encourage commercial and industrial development.
2. Take a closeup look of the west mall area for future
development. Survey the effected residents to see what needs and
uses are desirable and undesirable. Actively recruit
businesses, services, etc. that we would like to see develop this
area.
III. Attendance Record Out of 18 Meetinas
Les Axdahl
16
Lorraine Fischer
17
Richard Barrett
16
Dennis Larson
17
Mary S i gmund i k
16
Bob Cardinal
18
Dave Whitcomb
18
Ralph Sletten
14
2
K
Appointed During the Year
■1 i �
George Rossbach 1
out of 1
. ..Sue Fiola 11
out of 13
Jeff Hanson 1
out of 1
1986 PLAN
AMENDMENTS
Amendment
PC Act
Council Action
1.
Density Conversion Table
Approved
Approved
(The Metropolitan Council will
not approve
this until
our engineering department
completes a .sewer study)
2.
Mailand Road (Kirby Property)
Approved
Approved
School to RL
3.
Century and Ivy (Cave)
Denial
Withdrawn
RM to SC
4.
Harmony School
Approved
Approved
LSC to RM
5.
Upper Afton Road
Approved
Ap
SC to Park
6.
Beaver Lake Water Tower
Approved
Ap
School to Water Tower
70
Geranium Avenue Park
Approved
Ap proved
RL to P
8.
Cave's Sterling St. Addition
Approved
Approved
Open Space to RL
90
Cave's Barclay Addition
Approved
Approved
RL to RM
141,
Minor Collector St. for Miggler
Addition
Approved
Approved
.11.
1768 McMenemy (Hmong Church)
Approved
Approved
12.
Radatz and White Bear Avenue
-
Dental Clinic
Approved
Approved
RM to LSC
13.
Woodlynn and Ariel
Salvation Army
Approved
Approved
K
Z - S'
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director Community Development
�'SUBJECT .Metropolitan Council Survey
DATE: May 6, 1987.
Introduction
Action. by Council:
Endorsed
ti Modif1ed�- �
Re j eeted....
Date
The Metropolitan Council is requesting that cities identify the five
most important issues facing the region. The Metropolitan Council
would like this information to assist them in settin g future
priorities for planning the region. (See attached letter.)
Background
The planning commission ranked the five most important issues of the
thirteen issues identified by the Metropolitan Council ncil and added one
more on improving.communications:
1. Strategic planning (Metropolitan Council's item 13)
2. Improve communications with cities and the eneral public
g p
3 . Vitality of the regional economy (item 2 )
4. Fiscal planning to pay for long -term infrastructure before baby
boomers reach retirement age (item 4 )
5-a Transportation (item 8 )
Recommendation
Identify five issues
kd
.. Attachment :
- Metropolitan Council Letter
R
t
J6
Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel, 612 291- 6359/TDD 291 -0904
March 27, 1987
TO: Metropolitan Ar Local Officials and Citizen
FROM: Steve Keefe, Metropolitan Council Chair
SUBJECT: An Invitation to Participate in Planning for the Region's Future
Decisions about our physical systems and human services are being ade right
nS g t
now that will shape the region we live in by the year 2000 and beyond* When we
make these decisions - -about water quality, transit, long -term care, housing.-we
are affecting our future. Solving today's problems requires g
P q es that we have a
better idea of where we're going in order to know what we should do now.
As a result, the Metropolitan Council has stepped up its strate is planning
B p ng
work this year. Our aim is to develop, with your help, a broadly shared vision
of the region's future, and to use, it as a framework for making today's
decisions without precluding our future options. This "vision" doesn't mean a
planned city of the future or anything like that. It's not to plan how eo le
P P
will live their lives, but to keep our options open and be prepared for
different contingencies. This approach has kept us strong and versatile in the
past,
To work, a regional vision must be shared broadly. It must reflect what many
different segments of our population want. If our aim is to ensure that the
government services people want are there in the next 20 to 30 years, we need
to know now what kinds of lives we'll want to be living then.
• An important part of the Council's work over the next few ears will b
Y e to
work with others in the region to discover and present various possibilities
and options* What kinds of jobs will be needed? What kinds of li fest Y les wil.i
people want? What kind of education? We plan to work with many citizens of
the re ion including local
g � g governments, business, labor, nonprofit
organizations, civic groups and groups with special needs. As we develop a
shared concept of just what it is that people want for the region, we can make
decisions aimed at creating it.
At a strategic planning retreat earlier this month, the Council raised a number
of potential long -range concerns for the region. The list is broad, coverin
6
everything from our prized quality of life -- especially as it affects the
regi human resources -. - financial resources for the. - infrastructure, to
preparing for .another energy crisis. : e hope you and your organization will
take time to gi the Council feedback on this initial list of concerns
identified at the retreat (which are not-in any special order:
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL NEED
S YOUR IDEAS -- PLEASE- CONTACT US
We like to talk with a Council member about
our ideas.
Ve would dike. to present - some -ideas at, a Council committee meeting.
We would be interested in attending a meeting somewhere in our area to
talk about these issues.
We would like to be placed on your strategic lann
planning mailing list.
Name
Organization
Address
MN,
Phone Number -- Work
Home
We think the five most important issues facie the region •
8 8 are:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
WB07 3A O PROTX3
i
�..I �w.t' Mw�L..•�r�•i.. I M�e 4 ' a.. L�. +.- .✓.�It'l.Yirw+.rs.�..�.i�.: at Zi L+L'e..Ke� . ..
o�z
4 �
,� Metropolitan Council
-� 300 Metro •
� o Square Building
0 Seventh and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
•� ��� Telephone (612) 291 -6359
April 10, 1987
T0: LOCAL OFFICIALS IN METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DISTRICTS 3 AND 7
The Metropolitan Council would like o �
organization to participate y ur help. We'd like to invite your
process a p e in the Council's current strategic
n effort to develop a broadly hared g planning
y vision for the future of the
Twin Cities Region. We intend to open a dialogue that will bri
io n8 together the
ideas of many citizens of the re nonprofit g n, including local goverrm�ents busines
p organizations , civic groups and rou ' es ,
labor, non
g ups with special needs,
The enclosed invitation explains o ur aims and lists a number of potential
range concerns for the region the Council , ldng-
give us f has identified. We hope You'll �tak
6 feedback on the list of concerns. We e
the time to impo need to know whether
You think these concerns are
focus is shay future regional issues, whether our
f p enough, and whether we may have missed some
important areas
together.
To obtain your ideas we
Please call G ' are available to meet with you in April or
uy Peterson of the. Council staff at p May.
arrangements. If you refer ' 2 9 1 '8527, to make
P , you ears communicate with us by comp leting nel closed short questionnaire and returning it to the C the
paid envelope that is a Council in the posta
e e-
lso enclosed. ta
e.
cerel ,
Chuck Wiger
Council Member Mary Hauser
District 3 Council Member
. District 7
Enclosures
• An Equal Opportunity Employer
z
+f
: � i:.>. ��wiM: Lti.+ A► ruS. R Iw. M�: �.. � f. y+. 3• Ji. �O.... Sakti. w ..QJ.::rr+cA • :
l
f
-2-
1. Quality: of, life, especially as it the region' human resources.
:Seen as one of the. region's greatest assets now and into the future.
Possible areas of focus:
Health services.
- Services to older people.
Arts offerings, services and programs.
Effective delivery of human services, including less fragmentation
among services, clearer access points, and coordination with physical
systems; e.g., low -- income housing and transportation.
Increased family expectations for schools and pressure for schools to
assume new roles.
2. Vitality of the regional economy.
Possible areas of focus:
Implications of service sector - oriented economy.
Productivity issues, especially in view of demographic trends.
dw Coping with global economic competition.
Anticipating the impacts of technology.
3. Amore systematic,.long -range look into social ills.
Possible areas of focus:
Analysis of the cost effectiveness of various integrating strategies
for dealing with social ills considering the effects of all government
systems from education and training to income maintenance to health
care to economic development.
Approaches to cost control based on roblem
p prevention.
u. Fiscal planning to pay for long -term infrastructure before baby boomers
reach retirement age.
Possible areas of focus:
Financial resources for infrastructure may be more available during
next 20 years than after 2010. ' .
Need to promote maintenance vso expansion given likely slowdown in
regional development,
Helping communities plan more integrated, long -range strategies to
address infrastructure issues. g
5: Water management ( ground and surface . water),
.:Possible .areas of focus:
- Nonpoint sources of pollution (e. urban runoff, agricultural
... .runoff): ,how much is the public to pay?
Impact on the Turin Cities of potential water shortages in the
southwest.
Issues associated with federal water quality permits and ossible
P
impacts on development. p
Y
it r
•
•l
Groundwater.pollution from solid waste disposal, including impacts
beyond!: the metro, area.
- ..Jurisdictional issues amon&.Public agencies in water management.
Effect .of cultural values in the way.. different age groups use water
( e.g., for lawns, showers).
6. Affordable housing.
Possible areas of focus:
- Evaluate what works and what doesn't (e.g., Section 8 subsidized
housing voucher program).
Monitoring of housing programs, such as private sector compliance with
federal requirements for tenants with lower incomes.
Affordability for "working poor" with incomes just above subsidy
levels.
Changing housing demand and market conditions related to demographics
and other factors.
7. Long -term care costs for the baby -boom population.
Possible areas of focus:
Fiscal planning, given future large elderly population.
New strategies to reduce future demands on long -term care system.
8. Transportation.
Possible areas of focus:
Attitudes regarding tolerable levels of congestion and the costs to
reduce that congestion.
What are the real development and life style goals the transportation
system must achieve?
• - What impact congestion has on the achieving of those goals.
Impact _in the Twin Cities of increased energy costs in event of a
shortage.
Importance of international travel via the airport.
Alternative technology solutions to transportation issues; e.g.,
.substituting telecommunications for transportation.
9. Coming energy crisis.
A
Possible areas of focus:
Anticipating when and how large an energy crisis the region may face.
. ,Contingency planning, especially related to � regional systems.
-
Impacts on development; i.e.,:current development decisions do not
include consideration for a potential energy shortage.
Impac on suburbs.
10. Job retraining.
Possible areas of focus*.
1
What works /what doesn't.
Who's providing retraining in public and private sectors, and how much
of need is being met? Coordination? Overlap?
9
- Spe,cial:issues related to disadvantaged populations.
Concept of investment in ; human capital,
What will the need be' over :the :next 20_ .years?
11. Disintegration of communities.
Possible areas of focus:
Who is moving in and out of the cities, and how are the moves related
to changes in household formation?
Impacts of transiency and the resulting breakdown of informal support
systems for elderly, children. Possible demands -for increased formal
services to compensate.
Impacts of magnet schools and busing.
Growing- scarcity of volunteers due to transiency, two - worker families ,
single- parent families.
When will central city problems show up in first -ring suburbs?
12. Segregation of people in communities. Possible areas of.focus:
Elderly housing,
Concentration of minorities in certain neighborhoods.
Concentration of low- income populations.
1 0
13. Strategic planning. Possible areas of focus:
Long -term viability of the region.
Value differences among generations and their impacts on people's
attitudes and behaviors; 1 e.g. , different demands for services.
Urban design issues; e.g., planning for reuse of buildings, designing
facilities for an older population (especially in inner -ring suburbs),
designing transportation as well as buildings for extreme climate,
changes in development patterns to reflect different economic /energy
conditions.
Anticipating technological change and its impacts, such as new
telecommunications technology.
Other items discussed at the retreat and possibly related to one or more of the
above concerns include:
Heroic medical care.
AIDS.
Twin Cities issues in relation to the , rural crisis.
Creating /maintaining a stable tax base.
Governmental financing - incentives and disincentives to solve '` ublie policy
.
P P Y
problems.
. about solid waste policy direction given undeveloped parts of
system such as recycling and composting.
DC2392
POADMI
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Mana
SUBJECT:. Out-of-State Travel and Trainin Polic
DATE:. Ma 14, 1987
Aci®n b Council:,
,
Endorsed--....
Mod if
Rejected......
Date.......
INTRO DUCT IOW
.The- re is to amend the Out-=of_State TraveT and Trainin polic so' an
emplo woul:d be -reimbur-sed.f -costs associated with conference or.trainin
fees; transportation; and meals and lod
BACKGROUND
The c Cit polic is:
"For out-of-state trainin approved b the Cit - Mana the Cit
, y
wil.1 pa for the conference fee, two-thirds of y the transportation
cost and Up to $50.00 -per da for meals and lod
I) Pzri VZ4Z TONI
The City should encoura emplo to keep current by.attendin occasional
trainin sessions, Most of the is offered locall however, a national.
conference is an opportunit for a lar of people, i lar profes-
n simi
sion.s. to share information and 'learn from "experts" in their fields.
It is anticipated.that there is one such conference per y ear, per department,
BUDGET IMPACT
.None
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the current out-of-state travel and trainin polic be
amended as follows:
."For out.-of-state trainin approved b the Cit Mana the Cit
will pa . for the conference fees, transportation costs, and reason -
eason-
able costs for meals and lod
MAM: I n