HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987 04-27 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, April 27, 1987
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 87 - 9
A) CALL TO ORDER
B) ROLL CALL
C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting No. 87 -6 (March 23, 1987)
D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E) CONSENT AGENDA
1. Accounts Payable
2. Plan approval - Bid Authorization - Beam Avenue water Main - Project 84 -12
3. Investment Agreement
4. Financing For Project 86 -04
5. Financial Transfer to Close Project 84 -10
6. Resolution Reaffirming - Beaver Creek Apartments - Revenue Bonds
7. Budget Transfer
F) PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M., Miggler Rezoning 2444 Maplewood Drive (4 Votes)
2, 7:10 P.M., Code Amendment Temporary (2nd Reading) (4 Votes)
3. 7:20 P.M., Upper Afton Road (McKnight to Century) - Project 86 -07
4 Votes)
4, 7 :30 P.M., PUD Revision Preliminary Plat and Rezoning Cave's Century
5th Addition (4 Votes for Rezoning)
5. Code Amendment - Smaller Single Dwelling Lots - 1st Reading
7:40 P.M., Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Lynnwood Terrace (4 Votes For
Rezoning Only)
G) AWARD OF BIDS
1. Hillwood Drive (Crestview to Marnie) Project 86 -05
2. Lease Purchase Financing For Computer System
H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Code amendment Freestanding Signs in LBC and CD Zones (2nd Reading)
4 Votes)
2. Code Amendment Exterior Siding (2nd Reading)
I ) NEW BUSINESS
1. Paratransit
2.. Order Public Hearin Water District 8 Improvements - Pro
3. Public Improvement Petition Me Street Water Main (Bush to Minnehaha)
Pro 87-13
4, Developer Pro Financin and Construction Report
5. 1986 Annual Financial Report and Audit
6. Council Approval Hire Permanent Part-Time Clerk T (Fill a Vacanc
7. No Parkin Castle Avenue
8. Bud Transfer Police Educational Incentive Pa Settlement
J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
2
30
40
50
6*
7*
80
9*
10*
L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
M) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, March 23, 1987
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 87 -6.
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the
Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order by Mayor Greavu
at 7:02 P.M.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Absent
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present
Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
1. Street Names
2. Remove H -1
3. Add Item I -8, South Oaks Final Plat
4. Informational Item - Community Development Block Grants
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGEN
Council removed Item E -2 to become Item I -9.
Mayor Greavu moved,_ seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Aves -
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the Accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check Register
dated 3 -11 -87 through 3- 13 -87, $717,432.85: Part II - Payroll dated
3 -6 -87, gross amount $138,960.47) in the amount of $856,393.32.
2. Policy Regarding Assessments on Parks
Discussed under Item I -9.
3. Federal Revenue Sharing
Approved the following:
1) the City Council appropriate the Federal revenue sharing
3/23
money received in 1987, plus accrued investment interest, to the
General Fund to partly finance the 1987 contracts between the City
and its three fire departments, and (2) that the City Council re-
quest that a financial plan, for the replacement of existing fire
trucks owned by the City, be developed and included in the 1988
Proposed Budget.
4. H.R.A. Commissioner Appointment
Approved the reappointment of Greg Schmit as a Commissioner of the
H.R.A. for a five (5) year term expiring in 1992.
5. Final Plat : Jefferson Fourth Addition
Approved the Jefferson Fourth Addition Final Plat.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M., Assessment Hearing - Arkwright Street, Project 86 -12.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
the adoption of the proposed assessment roll for the Arkwright Street
Construction Project 86 -12.
b. Acting City Engineer Chuck Ahl presented the Staff report.
c. City Attorney Patrick Kelly explained the procedures of the assess-
ment hearing.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
Mrs. Betty Hasse, 385 Eldridge
e. Mayor Greavue called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Cliff Sandmeyer, 410 E. County Road B
Mr. Ray Nadeau, 407 Eldridge
A letter of opposition filed by Mr. Richard Schreier, 2125 Desoto Street
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -3 -46
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to
the proposed assessment for the construction of Arkwright Street from
Eldridge Avenue to County Road B as described in the files of the City
Clerk as Project 86 -12, and has amended such proposed assessment as it
deems just,
2 - 3/23
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted
and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included
is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement
in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be paable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 20 years, the first of the install-
ments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January,
1988, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9) percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution
until December 31, 1987. To each subsequent installment when
due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid install-
ments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to
reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost
of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying
additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided
for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abut-
ting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties
abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the
improvement, when changed conditions relating to such proper-
ties made such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting
properties which may be served by the improvement when one
or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which
are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to
be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota
Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding
any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied
for any of such later extension or improvements.
5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the
property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall
be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson,
Juker, and Wasiluk
Nay - Mayor Greavu.
3 - 3/23
2. 7:10 P.M., Assessment Hearing County Road C Water Main, Project 86 -04
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
the adoption of the proposed assessment roll for the County Road C
Water Main, Project 86 -04.
b. Acting City Engineer Ahl presented the Staff report.
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the assessment hearing procedures.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. William Mitchell, 1003 E. County Road C
Mr. Donald McClellan, 961 E. County Road C, requested that the
number of water services he was given be reduced from 4 to 1.
Mrs. Rita Huot, 999 E. County Road C, stated she was over charged
by 4; feet.
Received a written objection from Edward and Frances Kath, 1011
E. County Road C.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Anderson moved to (1) reduce the assessm
HH 999 E. County Road C (04- 29 -22 -34 -0007) by 4.52 feet
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
87 -3 -47
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to
the proposed assessment for the construction of the County Road C
water main as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 86-
04, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof; is hereby accepted
and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein in-
cluded is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed im-
provement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
4 - 3/23
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual install-
ments extending over a period of 2M years, the first of
the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday
in January, 1988, and shall bear interest at the rate of
ten (10) percent per annum from the date of the adoption
of this assessment resolution. To the first installment
shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the
date of this resolution until December 31, 1987. To each
subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for
one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is her, - declared to be the intention of the Council to
reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost
of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levy-
ing additional assessments, on notice and hearing as pro-
vided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties
abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any proper-
ties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed
for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to
such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting
properties which may be served by the improvement when one
or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which
are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to
be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota
Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding
any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied
for any of such later extension or improvements.
5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate
of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on
the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as
other municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
Mayor Greavu recessed the meeting at 8:00 P.M.
Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 8:12 P.M.
3. 7:20 P.M., Variance and Preliminary Plat : Cave's Gervais Addition
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
request of Ed Cave and Son's to approve Cave's Gervais Addition prelimi-
nary plat and a corner lot variance to create eight single dwelling lots
and two outlots.
b. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Staff
report.
c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
Sam Cave, representing Ed Cave and Sons.
5 - 3/23
d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following expressed their
opinions:
Mr. LeRoy Tuil, 2352 Barclay
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
87 -3 -48
WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Incorporated, applied for a corner lot
width variance for Lot Seven, Cave's Gervais Addition.
WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 (f) (2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances
requires a minimum of 100 feet of width for single - dwelling corner lots;
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 87.17 feet, requiring a variance
of 12.83 feet.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows:
1. This variance was applied for on March 6, 1987.
2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
on March 16,1987. This Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said variance be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 23,
1987, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing
were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state-
ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City Staff and Planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to this property, because:
a. The variance would not alter the essential character
of the neighborhood. Existing corner lots in this vicinity
range from 84 feet to 90 feet of width.
b. Denial of the variance would be unreasonable because
Lot One would have an undesirable 33 feet of buildable
width, unless the developer voluntarily drops one lot.
c. A lot with only 33 feet of buildable width would re-
sult in a structure that is out -of- character with the area.
6 - 3/23
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to his property that were created by the City when
the trunk sanitary sewer was sited without regard to the
location of future lot lines.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the ordinances because:
a. The proposed corner lot would be compatible with area
development.
b. The interior lots fronting on Gervais Avenue would be
more compatible with existing development than if the vari-
ance were to be denied.
c. Council has approved similar variances.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes- all.
g. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve Cave'
met
a. City engineer approval of final grading, utility and drainage
plans. These plans shall include, but not be limited to, a drainage
swale along the west property line of Lot One. This swale is to
function as a positive overflow for the pond.
b. A signed developer's agreement and surety shall be submitted
to the City Engineer which shall include, but not be limited to:
1) Repair of Hazelwood and Gervais Avenues following
utility construction within the right -of -ways.
2) Removal of the dwelling and /or accessory structures
at 2411 Hazelwood Avenue, unless a survey is submitted
showing that the structures meet City setback require-
ments.
c. Submittal of recordable deeds to the Director of Community
Development to combine Outlots A and B with the properties abut-
ting to the west. The developer shall pay all costs of recording
these deeds. As an alternative, that plat may be expanded to in-
clude the area shown as Outlots A and B combined with a replat of
the two lots to the west.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
4. 7:30 P.M., Preliminary Plat : Cave's Nevada Addition
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
the request of Ed Cave & Sons for preliminary plat approval to create
55 single dwelling lots and five outlots.
7 - 3/23
R Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Juker moved to table this Item and to hold a new hearing
on April 13, 1987.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
5. 7 :40 P.M., Conditional Use Permit
Apartments)
Ayes - all.
131 No. Century (Brookview Manor.
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
request of H and I Investments for approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to demolish and rebuild an existing ten -car garage structure (the existing
garage is nonconforming since it does not meet the required five foot set-
back from the north lot line).
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report.
c. Board Member Don Moe presented the Community Design Review Board
recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
A representative from H and I Investments
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard..
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -3 -49
WHEREAS, H and I Investments initiated a conditional use permit
to reconstruct a nonconforming garage building at the following -
described property:
Lots twenty -six (26),Thirty (30) and thirty -one (31), Block six
6), Brower Park, all of Lot twenty -seven (27) except that part
described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot
twenty -seven (27), thence West along the Northerly line of Lot
twenty -seven (27), seventy (70) feet to a point; thence South in
a straight line to the Southwest corner of Lot twenty -nine (29);
thence Northeasterly along the Easterly line of Lot twenty -seven
27) to the point of beginning, all in Block six (6), Brower Park,
according to the plat thereof filed of record in the office of the
Registrar of Titles within and for said County, according to the
recorded plat thereof, and situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
8 - 3/23
This property is also known as 131 N. Century Avenue, Maplewood
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was initiated by H and I Invest-
ments, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood
Community Design Review Board on February 24, 1987. The
Community Design Review Board recommended to the City Council
that said permit be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on March 23,
1987. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law.
All persons.present at-said hearing were given an opportunity to
be heard and present written statements. The Council also con-
sidered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Com-
munity Design Review Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of
the following findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or distrubing
to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the
noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution,
water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic_ on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe
access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the
area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and
parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements
at public cost for public facilities and services; and would
not be detrimental to the welfare of the City.
9 - 3/23
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural
and scenic features into the development design.
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
11. The new structure would be safer and more attractive than
the existing one.
12. The new structure would be built entirely on the applicant's
property.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan, date stamped February 9, 1987,
unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design
Review Board.
2. Stop signs shall be provided at the apartment complex exits
to Brookview Drive and Century Avenue.
3. All bituminous drives and parking areas shall be patched as
code requires.
4. The siding shall be aluminum, so no future painting will be
needed.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker.
11 7:50 P.M., Code amendment : Free Standing Signs in LBC and CO Zones
1st Reading).
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
the proposal to increase the 80 square foot maximum area for pylon
signs in the LBC, limited business commercial and CO, commercial office
districts.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report.
c. Board Member Moe presented the Community Design Review Board
recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Jack Hillstrom, Maplewood State Bank
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
10 -3/23
g. Councilmember Wasiluk ance amendin
The maximum area of a freestanding business sign shall be as
follows:
6,000 sq. ft. or less
6,000 sq. ft. to 1 acre
More than 1 acre
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
G. AWARD OF BIDS
None.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Total Sign Copy Area
80 sq. ft.
150 sq. ft.
200 sq. ft.
Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Council -
members Anderson and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker
1. Code Amendment : Building Code (Second Reading)
Removed from Agenda
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Code Amendment : Banners (First Reading)
a. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading on an ordinance regulating
banners.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Juker,
2
and Wasiluk
Nay - Mayor Greavu
Consultant For Lighting of Goodrich Softball Diamond No. 1
a. Director of Parks and Recreation Bob Odegard presented the Staff report
b.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson Ayes - all.
11 - 3/23
3. Reorder Public Hearing - McKnight Road - Beaver Lake to Larpenteur,
Project 81 -20.
a. Acting City Engineer Chuck Ahl presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
87 -3 -50
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood has previously
held a public hearing on April 28, 1986, for the reconstruction of McKnight
Road from Beaver Lake to Larpenteur Avenue, City Project 81 -20, and
WHEREAS, a contract will not be let within one year of April 28,
1986, as required by Minnesota Statute 429.041, Subdivision 1, and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has revised and presented to the City
Council the feasibility report from the April 28, 1986 public hearing,
dated April 4, 1986;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The report, dated April 4, 1986, and revised by the City
Engineer, that advises this Council that the proposed recon-
struction of McKnight Road from Beaver Lake to Larpenteur
Avenue, City Project 81 -20, is feasible and should best be
made as proposed, is hereby received.
2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in ac-
cordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to MSA Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of
the improvement of $6,523,585.00.
3. A reholding of the public hearing will be held in the Council
Chambers of the City hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday,
the 13th day of April, 1987, at 7:10 P.M. to consider said im-
provement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law.
4. The council shall approve the letting of a construction con-
tract by Ramsey County for all or a portion of said improvement
no later than December 31, 1988.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
4. No Parking Ordinance - Ramsey County Overlay
a. Acting City Engineer Ahl presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved
it adoption:
12 - 3/23
87 -3 -51
WHEREAS, plans for projects:
Lydia Avenue McKnight Road to Bellaire Avenue
County Road C Oxford Street to Victoria Street
S.A.P. 62- 619 -12
S.A.P. 62- 623 -31
Larpenteur Avenue Edgerton Street to Parkway Drive S.A.P. 62- 630 -28
McKnight Road I -94 to Third Street S.A.P. 62- 668 -27
Old Highway 8 County Road D to Sixth Street N.W. S.A.P. 62- 677 -13
showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the
construction, reconstruction or improvement of County State Aid Highways
No. 19, 23, 30, 68 and 77, within the limits of the City as a State Aid
project have been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things
approved.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu Ayes - all.
c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -3 -52
RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COUNTY
TO RESTRICT PARKING ALONG A PORTION OF McKNIGHT ROAD
WHEREAS, the County has planned the improvement of McKnight Road
CSAH 68) from I -94 to East Third Street; and
WHEREAS, the County will be expending County State Aid Highway
funds (S.A.P. 62- 668 -27) on the improvement of said street; and
WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum
standards as previously adopted for such County State Aid streets and
that approval of the proposed construction as a County State Aid street
project must, therefore, be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions;
and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions, that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a County State Aid
project in the City, has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City requests the
County to restrict the parking of motor vehicles on the east side of
McKnight Road from I -94 to East Third Street.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
13 - 3/23
5. Cancellation of Park Development Projects and Addition of New Projects
a. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the following: (1
project and return the funds to their nronar
Project #321 - Lions Park Improvement - $7,100 returned to Neighborhood #89Project #335 - Gethsemane Play Equipment - $3,400 returned to Neighborhood89
Project #362 - Four Seasons Blacktop Parking Lot - $10,600 returned to
Account #94
Project #375 - Play Equipment at Four Seasons, Lions, Pleasantview,
Wakefield, Maplecrest and Robinhood Parts - $15,450
returned to Account #94
Project #381 - Afton Heights Backstop and Playground Equipment - $2,775
returned to Account #94
Project #385 - Goodrich Driveway' and Parking Areas - $1,920 returned
to Account #94
Project #388 - Maplecrest Grading, Trees and Shrubs - $2,000 returned
to Account #82
Project #389 - Maplewood Heights Exercise Trail - $3,500 returned to
Account #85
Project #393 - Western Hills Backstop - $1,000 returned to Account #81
Project #396 - Playground Equipment - $6,445 returned to Account #94
2) authorize the following expenditures:
600 for Playground Equipment for Maplewood Heights Park - Account #85
500 for Playground Equipment for Gloster Park from Neighborhood Account96
5,000 for Fencing at Harvest Park from Commercial Account #94
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
6. Order Assessment Hearing - Hillwood Drive, Project 86 -05
a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following rsolution and moved its adoption:
87 -3 -53
WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the
Council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of Hillwood
Drive, City Project 86 -05, and the said assessment roll is on file in
the office of the City Clerk;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of April 1987, at
the City Hall at 7:50 P.M. to pass upon such proposed
assessment and at such time and place all persons owning
property affected by such improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
14 - 3/23
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the
official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing,
and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected
by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place
of hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area
proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll
is on file with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections
will be considered.
4. Prepayment of each parcels' assessment shall be allowed,
without an interest charge, from the date of adoption of said
assessment roll to May 15, 1987. All unpaid assessments shall
bear interest at the rate of nine (9) percent per annum from
the date of adoption of the assessment roll.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.
7. Aerial Repairs
Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Wasiluk
Nay — Councilmember Juker.
a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Fire Marshal Jim Embertson spoke on behalf of the proposal.
c. Mayor Greavu
cover the cost o
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson
8. South Oaks Final Plat
Ayes — all.
210 to
a. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the South Oaks 2nd Addition
Final 'tat.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes — Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Wasiluk
Nay — Councilmember Juker
9. Policy Regarding Special Assessments On Parks
a. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
87 -3 -54
WHEREAS, parks are owned by and available to all citizens, and
WHEREAS, all citizens are benefited by parks, and
the aer
15 — 3/23
and
WHEREAS, parks provide physical, social and emotional outlets,
WHEREAS, parks improve the physical environment of the City and
enhance and preserve the overall quality and character of land develop-
ment within the City, and
WHEREAS, parks further the interest of the health, welfare and
safety of the people of the City, and
WHEREAS, this policy is intended and designed to provide equitable
and consistent benefits to all citizens of Maplewood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD that it shall be the policy of the City of Maplewood that
all assessments on lands purchased or presently owned or leased for
parks shall be financed by property taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson.
J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Mr. James Trapp
Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson
and Wasiluk
Nays - Mayor Greavu, Council -
member Juker
a. Mr. Trapp, representing Precision Tuning, requested Council's help
in resolving their problem of their building being constructed in the
wrong location.
b. Council directed Staff to work with the owners of Precision Tuning
to try and resolve the problem.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Street Names
a. Councilmember Juker questioned how streets are named.
b. Staff stated if the streets are within a new plat, the developer
provides street names and Staff tries to aline street's name with
existing street.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Community Development Block Grants
a. Acting City Manager Haider presented the Staff report.
b. Council directed Acting Manager Haider to apply for the block
grants by the deadline, March 31, 1987.
M. ADJOURNMENT
9:38
16 - City Clerk 3/23
092M0 t 04/ 14/87 %{ 1 MAPLEWD ATHL ASSOC PROGRAMS
t Ll
Action Gouncil
Endorsed
Rejecte
MANUAL CHECKS DATED THRU APRIL 10 ,1.9 8 7Date JP.;;.,g. .
a ... .. ». , _....... vs... a• ai:.+ oa:..«.riL.aii+t:inirsxi+FC!' 'it.YYV •wwu.Yr'.I.s .v.4•.ri.1.. .. - WIS': " ^.. .'.jSif'a. .:. • •V.v.21l.
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N0.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
091032 04/14/87 28.00 BLUEBERRY CO PROGRAMS
28.00
f sss•s
091128 04/14/87 52.80 PERSONAL — FOOL MN TEMP WAGES ~ -
52.80
09 1 A83 04/14/87 4 METRO MUNI COPAL MEMBERSHIP
4, 293.00
09! 812 04/ 14!87 49.96 BEST PROD SUPPLIES
49.9
sws•
091L30 04/14/87 46,146.00 L.M.C.I.T CONTRACT PYM
091L30 04/14/87 32,315.50 L.M.C.I.T CONTRACT PYM
76, 461 . 50 r
091 M69 04/i 4f87 386.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE
386.00 •
491P96 04/14/87 3,600.00 PU MGMT CONS CONTRACT PYM
3, b00. 00
092830 04/14/87 195.77 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE2B304/ 14/87 222.38 BLUE CROSS INSURANCE
092830 04/14/87 2 BLUE CROSS INSURANCEa ,
2'
2.515.42 »
092C40 04/14!87 128.50 CLERK OF COURT FILING FEE
128.50
1'
1 098978 04/14/87 1 ,163.08 CROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
09267 04/14/87 50 _81_3 . 27 CROUP HEALTH INSURANCE
Go 976.3S •
092M0 t 04/ 14/87 %{ 1 MAPLEWD ATHL ASSOC PROGRAMS
Page: 2
vy i ,.• " y.,1i•e! `g!i n.! riJ "r. +w. :'. i' +rte.:: K..asl.v . v t . y .. F 2 - -' -
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
CHECK NO.'DATE AMOUNT .
1,424.50 •
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
092M69 ' _04/14/87 _11 STATE TREASURER LICENSE
092"69 04/14/87 221.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE
ii.759.23 •
09P828 04/14/67 178.68 _SHARE INSURANCE _
092328 04/14/87 345.42 SHARE INSURANCE
092 04/14/87 2,788.30 SHARE INSURANCE
3.306.60
o
093024 04/14/87 15.00 ST ANTHONY CITY TRAVEL TRAINING
093024 04/14/87 34.00 ST ANTHONY CITY TRAVEL TRAINING
0.93024 04/14/87 68.00 _ST ANTHONY CITY TRAVEL TRAINING
093024 04/14/87 17.00 ST ANTHONY CITY TRAVEL TRAINING
093024 04/14/87 34.00 ST ANTHONY CITY TRAVEL TRAINING
168.00
093L45 04/14/87 61 .50 LESLIE ^ PAPER SUPPLIES _
093L45 04/14/87 98.34 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES
093L45 04/14/87 _146.66 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES
093L45 04/14/87 230.22 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES
093L45 04/14/87 885.33 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES
093L45 04/14/67 310 55 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES
093L45 04/14/87 73.33 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES
1,205.93
r
6 ,.393. 13 MINN - STATE TREASURER L_ICENSE
093MG9 04/14/87 6.941.33 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE
093M69 04/14/87 363.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE
131. 697.46 •
093N80 04/14/87 3.67 N.S.P UTILTIES
093N80 04/14/87 75.50 N.S.P UTILTIES
3 093N80 04/14/87 151.38 __N.S.UTILTIES
830.49
093P95 04/14/87 8.766.69 P.E.R.A.P/R DEDUCT
093P95 04/i t , 723. 19 P ._ . R . A .P/N DEDUC .
20,489.88
7;
Page: 3
04 /14/87 25.00 LK CNTY CHAPTR ICB TRAVEL TRAINING
25..00 •
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
096M15
CHECK REGISTER
50201.58 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FICA
096H15 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FICA
CHECK NO.DATE ___- ______.__AMOUNT._. _-T -_
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
096M15 04/14/87 5, 201.58 AAPLEWOOD ST BANK FICA
09GA05 _ -_04/ 14/87 ___ --429.65 AFSCME UNION OVER
429.65 «
UNION
METRO SUPERVISORY UNION DUES -
18.00 «
4` . _096M61
096A45 04/14/87 295.00 AMER PLANNING ASSOC TRAVEL TRAINING
04/14/87 13.85 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS
295.00 s
460.00 •
096C35 --04/14/87 --- - - -21 , 023.50 -- +CTY CNTY CREDI TUN - -- -CREDIT UN
SWT PB
21,023.50
1 '
096"68 04/14/87 110.84 MN ST RETIREMENT SYS
096115 _04/14/87 3, 804.57 ICMA DEFERRED COMP
DEFERRED COM
096115 04/14/87 1 , 7810 93 __ _._ _.__.
C WAS CA +
ICMA DEFERRED COMP
096L38 04 /14/87 25.00 LK CNTY CHAPTR ICB TRAVEL TRAINING
25..00 •
096M15 04/14/87 50201.58 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FICA
096H15 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK FICA
096M15 04/14/8T 287.50 MAPLEWOOD ST BANK SAVINGS BONOS
096M15 04/14/87 5, 201.58 AAPLEWOOD ST BANK FICA
26079.24 •
F
096M18 04/14/87 18.00 METRO SUPERVISORY UNION DUES -
18.00 «
4` . _096M61 04 446.MN MUTUAL LIFE INS_INSURANCE
096M61 04/14/87 13.85 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS INSURANCE
460.00 •
096M65 04/14/87 T, 671 .8!MN ST COMM /REV.SWT PB
096"68 04/14/87 110.84 MN ST RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP
096M68 04/1 46.16 MN ST RETIREMENT - SYS DEFERRED COM
157.•00
096M69 04 8,699 MINN STATE TREASURER LICENSE
r.r..4:.a:i'.' q;1'„1" SIC 'w':.t'Y,"t.l!!!/ICr7'Y,-
i{1 Lo" iMH.#J+.it'+w9r'I+M_Sw+J
Page: 5
i't.iN°5Rk•'iJ(i_r: -.-..- _ . , -. '
1967 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ss! **
099A07 04/14/87 193.21 ABRA REPAIR
099C40 04/ 14/87 - - -129. 00 CLERK OF COURT_ - --FILING FEE
129.00
099E64 04/14/87 1 EMPLO BE DENT I
1, 00 0.00
ss! *s
09.9M20 04/14/87 144, 159.10 M. W. C. C.SEWER SERVICE
144,0
099M69 --04/ 14/67 13,MINN STATE TREASURER LIDENSE
099MG9 04/14/8T 264.00 MINN STATE TREASURER LIDENSE
14 054. TT
099RO9 04/14/87 6,406.40 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM
6,406.40 w
10OM69 04/14/87 10, 851.39 MINN STATE TREASURER_LIDENS
OOMG9 04/ 14%87 370.00 MINN STATE TRE LIDENSE
11,221.39
10O 04/14/67 225.00_HENN CNTY CH PT TR TRAINING
225.00 s
204,164.68 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL
6,406.40 FUND 11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT
90, 952.60 FUND 63 TOTAL 86 -3 CENTURY AVE
145, 959.10 FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER F
1 FUND 94 TOTAL DENTAL SELF —INSI
61 , 783 FUND 95_ TOTAL PAYROLL BENEFIT
510,265.83 TOTAL
ter- ^- vy.- 1•-- ..- "•v•^'T w•v+r...w +•.+!!.+•.wr w
ACCUi1TS PAY DAT D. APRZ I9 8 7 Pa IY.M1 / mar JrRm iC'i.iitl[LMYvw'4. "'.'Y OV' L
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
i 117033 04/17/87 42.00 ENGINEERING MEMBERSHIP
42.00 •
1 117034 04/17/87 252.00 HERMANN MARKETING SUPPLIES
252.00 •
1 117035 04/17/87 3,014.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MEMBERSHIP
1 3, 014.00
117036 04/17/87 53.00 MILE SUPPLIES
53.00
117037 04/17/87 45.00 MINN TITLE CONTRACT PYM
45.00 +
117038 04/17/87 38.00 SKS ELECTRIC REFUND
38.00
f
117039 04/17/87 235.00 WILLETT PAULA REFUND
235.00
F
117042 -04/17/87 -1 PEOPLES ELECTRIC REPAIR MA INT
1,950.00 •
4'
117066 04/17/87 47.00 SI GFORD&JOHNSON SUPPLIES
47.00 *
r.
117078 04/17/87 480.00 CENTRAL RAMSEY WATER CONTRACT PYM
ry 480.00 •
117A01 04/17/87 ACE HARDWARE _ -+- - --SUPPLIES7.34
117A01 04/17/87 46.28 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
117A01 04/17/87 33.29 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
117A01 04/17/87 -
r
33.66 - --ACE HARDWARE - - --SUPPLIES
117A01 04/17/87 11.62 ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES
F 132.19 +
ij
Fi 1 - 17A 13 --04/17/87 90.00 ACCURATE ELECTRIC _ _- - - - -- -_SUPPL IES - ~_ - - - - --
f 117A13 04/17/87 87.50 ACCURATE ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
17 w
i
i
S
117A18 -04/17/87 136 -.36 ALLANSON BUS PROD SUPPLIES - - -- -
136.36
F %"
I
l
tt
AP
w..q,.: ... raf Tf: . t' 3': iza= • = !1.:•"us-r:.:t+1G -'.. .i.;...:,., ,•. .
a
Y
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK_NO . DATE AMOUNT VENDOR -- _ITEM DESCRIPTION
N *ss *
1 117A21 04/17/87 36.95 ACTION RADIO CTR SUPPLIES
36.95
117A53 04/17/87 299.35 ARI MECH SERVICES REPAIR MAINT
299.35
1 -
t 1 ?A55 04/17/87 179.07 . - _AMER I -DATA SYSTEM CONTRACT PYM117ASS04/17/87 59900000 AMERI DATA SYSTEM CONTRACT PYM117A5504/11/87 432.00 AMERI -DATA SYSTEM MTNCE CONTRACT11704/ 178T _87.13 ---..-I -DATA SYSTEM CONTRACT PYM
1#297.20 •
117A69 04/17/87 17.95 ARNALS AUTO SERV REPAIR MAINT117A69
117A69
04/17/87 _
04/17/87
1:52_. so - _ _._ARNALS AUTO SERV _REPAIR MAINT VEH
117A69 04/17/87
418.81
196.93
ARNALS AUTO SERV
ARNALS AUTO SERV
REPAIR MAINT
REPAIR MAINT
786.19 •
y 117A70 04/17/87 26.29 ATCHISON JOHN H TRAVEL TRAINING
26.29
s *wss*
117A75 04/17/87 3.55 A T 6 T —TELEPHONE117A7504/17/87 4.50 A T 6 T TELEPHONE "117A75 04/17/87_____T.__TELEPHONE
3E
117A75 04/17/87 2.25 A T i T TELEPHONE
23.05 s
a
1 17B0S 04/17/87 3, 187.50 BANN I CAN &KELLY P.A.CONTRACT PYM11790504/17/87 1,368.75 BANNIGAN6KELLY P.A. CONTRACT PYM -
4,556.25 •
117907 04/17/8 —1#481-05 . ____BAREFOOT LAWN SERV PREPAYMENT
1 , 481 .05 •
117914 04/17/87 51.00 BAILEY NURSERIES INC SUPPLIES
51.00 i
117915 04/17/87 307.00 BATTERY TIRE WHSE EQUIP
t -...w. r.i"''o!Fl4 rryw.eqll: :r_ ^4'•7ksAi.LAe+f. -. _.rMe.N+!
PAGE: 3
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK --NO.DATE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
307.00
117825 04/17/87 1,680.00 BEACON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES
117026 04/17/87 18 80 BERGERON JOSEPH TRAVEL TRAINING
18. +
117031 04/17/87 7.00 BLUE HERON BOOKSHOOP SUPPLIES
117935 04/17/87 BRACKE LOUIS UTILTIES
1*903.00
117B36 04/17/87 10.00 BRIGGS CASSIOP TRAVEL TRAINING
117B36 04/17/87 10.00 BRIGGS CASSIOPI TRAVEL TRAINING
20.00
117845 04/17/87 17.58 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILTIES
117B45 04/17/87 52.76 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILTIES
117B45 . .....04/17/87 25.64.BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILTIES
117B45 04/17/87 8.56 BOARD - OF WATER COMM UTILTIES
117845 04/17/87 120.12 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILTIES
117945 04/17/87 12.12 BOARD OF WATER COMM UTILTIES
128.78 •
117B94 04/17/87 30.47 BUILDERS 0 SUPPLIES
30.47
117C06 210. 00 CANTERBURY DOWNS PROGRAMS
210.00
117C13 04/17/87 85.50 CARX REPAIR MAINT
85.50 !
117C17 04/17/87 e13.45 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP SUPPLIES
213.45
PAGE: 4
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.DATE VENDOR _ _ITEM DESCRIPTION
117 30.79 CANANES ANTHONY TRAVEL TRAINING
30.79 •
117C31 04/17/87 27.85 CLAUSON DALE K TRAVEL TRAINING
27.85
117C37 04/17/87 14.40 CLARK BOARDMAN LTD BOOKS
14.40 w
117C38 04/17/87 33.75 CLEAN STEP RUGS RUG CLEANING117C3804/17/87 32.75 CLEAN STEP RUGS RUC CLEANING
66.50
s * * * *s
49 CLINTON 0 GORMAN PA CONTRACT PYM04/17/87 1,537.50
1,537.50 +
1 7C _ 0_4./_.J.7/ - 87 256.10 __. __-COPY DUPLICATING _ _DUPLICATING COST
y
256.10
117D30 04/17/87 4.29 DALCO SUPPLIES17D30. _04/17/87 70...56 _ _DALCOSUPPLIES11703004/17/87 13.35 DALCO SUPPLIES ~ -~117D30 04/1 7/87 85.73 DALCO SUPPLIES °1 17030 04/17/87 8.00 SUPPLIER117D30y04/17/87 125.521
DALCO
DALCO -SUPPLIES
291.45 +
I _
4 117D33 0 38.63 OREGER RICHARD C TRAVEL TRA I N I NC38.63 +
117D35 04/17/87 902.00 DALEY PAT CONTRACT PYM
902.00 a
117D37 DATA DISPATCHING DELIVERY04/17/87 20.00
20.00 +
117040 04/17 150 .00 DEP O PUBLIC SFTY MAIN - ;
Pa 5
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
DATE AMOUNT VENDOR
04/17/87
ITEM DESCRIPTION
6
150.00
SERVICES UNIFORMS117GIO04/17/87 ____9 K RSERVICES UNIFORMS117C10
I17D46 04/17/87 492.76 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY TAXES
SERY ICES UNIFORMS117910 -
492*76
50.80 6 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117C1004/17/87 50.80 9 i
117E07 04/17/87 39.90 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST.117E07
K
e6.60 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST41*117EO7 04/17/8?146.25 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST!117EO7 04/17/87 e52.60 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST!04/11/87 385.58 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATINIC COST!117E07
04/17/87
66.48 EASTMAN KODAK CO_'__DUPLICATING COST!117EO7 04/17/87 199.45 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST!
UNIFORMS
212.75 EASTMAN KODAK CO DUPLICATING COST!
K SERVICES'
It 329. 61
117010 04/17/87 37.80 G
117.GIO 04/17/87 12.60 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117GIO04/17/87 ____9 K R SERVICES UNIFORMS117C1004/ 17/87 so 6 K SERY ICES UNIFORMS117910 -04/17/87 50.80 6 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117C1004/17/87 50.80 9 i K SERVICES UNIFORMS117CI004/17/W 49*54 6 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS11701004/17/87 50.80 9 K SERVICES UNIFORMS
04/17/87 50.80 0 K SERVICES UNIFORMS11701012-60 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS1170I004/17/87 12.60 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117910
1701
04/17/87 37.80
7.8
G K SERVICES UNIFORMS
0 G K SERVICES'UNIFORMS11701004/17/87 37.80 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS117610 _______04/17/87
7/87
37.80 6 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117C1037.4 k SERVICES _____UNIFORM9117CI004/17/87 33.39 G 4 K SERVICES UNIFORMS14791004/17/87 33.39 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS11701004/17/87 33.1 t SERVICES UNIFORMS117CI004/17/87 30.56 9 4 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117CI004/17/87 33.39 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS11761004/17/87 6 i K SERVICES FORMS1170I004/17/87 18.00 9 K SERVICES UNIFORMS
17C 10. -0-4./1-7/87 18.00 .9 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117CIO04/17/87 18.00 K SERVICES UNIFORMS117c1004/17/87 18.00 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS11791004/17/87 12.60 9 K SERVICES UNIFORMS
solf 66
117CI8 04/20/87 31.64 GLIDDEN CO SUPPLIES11791804/20/87 31.64 GLIDDEN CO SUPPLIES11791804/17/87 lil ' 64 GLIDDEN CO'__-_____'__ ____SUPPLIES
SI
31.64
Page: 6
i... -...__ .:;,: •.w,.: ;.•io-w..:Avr .wfT.4. - "'-
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK N .. , DATE _ _ AMOUNT — _ _ _VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
11 7G25 04/17/87 5.00 GEISSLER WALTER NOTARY FILING
5.00 +
117G26 04/17/87 93.92 GLENWOOD SUPPLIES
93.92 i
117G46 04/17/87 35.52 GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES
li7C46 04/17/87 35.52—GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES
1 1.7G 35.5P MENU I NE PARTS — .SUPPLIES
117G46 04/17/87 10.37 GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES
117646 04/17/87 35.52 GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES
117G46 04/17/87 _ --35.52— — — ___GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES
g 45.89 •
117651 04/17/87 8.32 GLADSTONE LUMBER SUPPLIES
1.1765 0 _40.37 T —_—CLADSTONE LUMBER UP P L I E S
48.69 *
8 -- - - - -- ----- —
p 117655 04/17/87 120.00 C.F.O.A.MEMBERSHIP
120.00 s
117G58 04/17/87 4.65 CREW JANET MILEAGE
117G58 04/17/87 8.80 CREW JANET MILEAGE
117658 04/ 17/87 Z0 . T5 GREW JANET
Y 117658 04/17/87 24.23 CREW JANET
MILEAGE
MILEAGE
Y
i
58.43
i
j'
117H14 04/17/87 23.12 HALWEG KEVIN R TRAVEL TRAINING
23.12 •
i 117H70 04/17/87 20.00 HORSNELL JUDITH TRAVEL TRAINING
20.00 •
s --
117H71 04/17/87 480.00 HORWATH THOMAS CONTRACT PYM
x 480_.00
117190 - --04/17/87 _140.00 INTL - CONE BLDG OFL8 - -MEMBERSHIP
f
f..140.00 s
i:du•.w.w ., ...:.>+a +:_•• .. -.: ::. • _r.._-
3
1
L N _ s . rt/as G td
I
661 1
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DE8CRIPTION
i
r
117L09 04/17/87 18.58 LAWTON PRINTING SUPPLIES
r
117L21 04/ 17/87 70.56 - - -LAKELAND FORD - -- _ -_ -_ --SUPPLIES
70.56 +
117L85 04/17/87 LUCER LUMBER SUPPLIES
1 17LBS 04/ 17/81 *68.45 LUCER LUMBER SUPPLIES
117LSS 04/17/87 68045 LUCER LUMBER SUPPLIES
168.89
1 - 17M06
W-
04/17/87 215.00 - -MASYS CORP -_MAI NT
215.00 +
117M14 04/17/87 47.74 -_MAPLEWOOD REVIEW PUBLISHING
1 17M 14 04/17/87 152.68 MAPLEWOOD REV I EW - --- _-PUBLISHING
104.94 +
y' i17M16 04/ 17 /87 180..00 MAPLEWOOD PLBG i HTC SUPPLIE
180.00 •
117M21 04/17/87 9.35 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY SUPPLIES
117M21 —04/17/87 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY SUPPLIES
16.41 •
117M26 04/17/87 56.00 MC NULTY JOHN SUPPLIES
1.17M26_04/ 17/87 84.00 MC NULTY JOHN SUPPLIES
140.00 •
117M59 04/17/87 23.30-MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES
23.30
117M88 -04/17/87 MI DWE8rt ANIMAL SERV _ -- .ANI MAI. CONTROL -,b t S . 30 -
a
1,615.30
1'a. _. . „w._. .,q..r•• — ;
I , * - . .Q'„"'rr1+y :aMR'F6S/f'T!M.`.O1172•i•'
Page: 8
1 ., y:. , -.. • -... ..s r w. :..- rnw :ia.•aay.,rair•.3..r...w•• . r iA7 /•r1na'/iiJi+•..•- •'- .'{i.1 l•.*\' Mi' atrr•i.w+.MtiL:Yn•.r.1.•.• s:•a.s•.11 .'3..: ,
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO._ DATE _ _AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCR I PT 101
tstst
El 117"90 04/17/87 3,985.60 MOTOROLA INC CONTRACT PYM
3o985.60 _
sttttt
117"97 04/17/87 148.32 MUNICILITE CO SVPPLIES
148.38 s
Y .
4 142.50. _ _NELSON ROBERT UNIFORMS
117N15 04/17/87 12.57 NELSON ROBERT TRAVEL TRAINING
x.
155.07
17N30 ___04/20/87 122.00 NORTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES
117N30 04/17/87 66.00 NORTH ST PAUL CITY UTILITIES
188.00
117N31 04/17/87 6.72 NO ST PAUL WELDING SUPPLIES
6.72 t
t
p
f1 117N80 _04/17/87 478.02 _ --N.S.P.UTILITIES
117N80 04/17/87 5.45 N.S.P.UTILITIES
k 117N80 04/17/87 508.51 N.S.P.UTILITIES
17N80_04/178 84.49 r H. 8. P. - -- --UTILITIES__
1 1,076.47 t
it_tttt
j 117P08 04/17/87 167.20 PAYETTE GREGORY EMT INSTRUCTOR
167. «
i
117P12 232.80 PAYETTE JEAN EMT INSTRUCTOR04/17/87
4.
232.80 «
117Pe6 04/ 17/87 16 ___PEPSI COLA POP MACHINENE
161 . 05
F+
tttt-
f;
117P30 04/17/87 3 PETERSON BELL CONV RETAINER
30000.00 •
t
f33
E.w..rw... •Yt e. .p•^f .v.n . ...t's...rr•....+. -:ARM+. oealrM. w• RF++•' w. ... ..•+ 1' w"_ ... ,Nr•w..w.w :.w.
Page.: 9
1 .
w . .4 ..Y.:. -. .. r.. Jr .•iW.Ja7r.: `.+4 s- .Ci.N_ ~ _ ••` f / a4Gt'icwli_s.i......c W- ..::M.t:wlw' .... .
1987 CITY
t '
CHECK REGISTER
t .
f
CHECK NO.
41 >
AMOUNT
Page.: 9
1 .
w . .4 ..Y.:. -. .. r.. Jr .•iW.Ja7r.: `.+4 s- .Ci.N_ ~ _ ••` f / a4Gt'icwli_s.i......c W- ..::M.t:wlw' .... .
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
f
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
117P40 X04/17/87 28.15 PHOTOS TO CO SUPPLIES
117P40 04/17/8T -- - - -3.85 -PHOT08 TO CO - - - --SUPPLIES
32.00 •
s
z;
117P45 04/17/87 27.50 PITNEY BOWES METER AD
117P45 -04%20/87 66.00 PITNEY BOWES -- - - - -^LEASE
ii
93.50
J
I
E! 117 04/17/87 85.50 PROFESSIONAL PROCESS AMB BILLINGS
85.50 - -
wsss*
117R01 04/17/87 188.90 R.J.THOMAS CO SUPPLIES
188.90 •
Yi
k! 117R 09 -04/17/87 P, 076 .63 -RAMSEY COUNTY - - - -__. - -CONTRACT PYM
k' 117R09 04/17/87 12,965.40 RAMSEY COUNTY CONTRACT PYM
15 •
ss * **
1 17R 13 - -04/17/87 5.65 - -RAY DAVIS SONS SUPPLIES
117R13 04/17/87 24.43 RAY DAVIS SONS SUPPLIES
30.08 s
117R20 04/17/87 RAZSKAZOFF_ DALE TRAVEL TRAINING34' . 48
34.48 s
sisss*
117R23 04 /17/87 3.50 RAMSEY COUNTY DEPT ASSESSMNTS LIST
s * **s*
117R41 04/17/87 386.25 RIHM MOTORS REPAIR MAINT
117R41 04/17/87 755.88—RIHM MOTORS REPAIR MAINT
11TR41 04%1'1/87,477.57 RIHM MOTORS _.____ _____-REPAIR MAINT
2,107.94
117R49 04/17/87 46.50 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR MAANT _
117R49 04/17/87 i 5.25 ROAD RESCUE - - __.SUPPLIES
117R49
t
04/17/87 604.19 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES
q
r., - .. r - .s h'" , sv K: >.,. ..p"Kt .':'i?•nh.`tM.r«•.:tfi K"• . 711'l•t' Hsi- .b1"'rl`'`"_'fL`"ti ""., .. .. ,
Page: 10
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE ___ AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIONION
117R49 04/20/87 15.25- - ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES
1 ssls!!
25.81 •
r,
117S02 04/20/87 56.20- -- -8 6 D LOCK SAFE SUPPL IES ^117502 04/17/87 56.20 S i D LOCK SAFE SUPPLIESy117802 --04/20/87 _56.20 i D LOCK SAFE SUPPLIES11780204/20/87 182.52 8 i D LOCK SAFE SUPPLIES11750204/17/87 182.52 8 i D LOCK SAFE SUPPLIES11780204 /20/87 365.04-8 i D LOCK SAFE SUPPLIES11780204/20/87 1812.52 8 &Z LOCK SAFE SUPPLIES
238.72 +
117803 04/20/87 7, 96 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES11750304/20/87 78.50 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES1.17803 -_04/20/87 - - _
w 2T . 58 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES11750304/20/87 32.16 SPS OFFICE PROD11750304/20/87 25.66 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES11780304/20/87__56 19_OFFICE PROD PL IES11750304/20/87 199.00 SPS OFFICE PROD
SUP
SUPPLIES11750304/20/87 84.88 SPS OFFICE PROD SVPPLIES04/20/87 28. 11 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES11780304/20/87 26.21 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPL IES --117803 04/20/87 30.07 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES11 ?803 04/20/87 _80.66 8128 OFFICE.-PROD SUPPLIES11750304/20/87 37.11 SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIESy11TS0301/20/87 Be SPS OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES117803_04120/87 39.79 _SP8 OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES11TS0304/80/87 998.00 SPS OFFICE PROD11750304/20/87 771.30 SP8 OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES
205
117805
SUPPL IES -+04/17/67 470 84 8 i T
Ts
47.84 +
117321 04/25.8 SKALMAN__DON TRAVEL TRAINING
25.81 •
r,
117529 04/17/87 175.00 SIGN CENTER SUPPLIES
175.00 +
117530 04/17/87 59.99 SEARS 88412 SUPPLIES
59.99 +
117837
117537
04/17/87
04/17/87
SEVEN CRNERS ACE HOW ---SUPPL IES3i. 80 -
89.90—SEVEN CRNERS ACE HOU SUPPLIES
t
Page: 11
1987 CITY
i
OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DE8CRIPT10
2.90 +
11 7539 04/17l87 1,464.71 SHORT ELLIOT HENDR CONTRACT PYM
117S39-04/17/87 3,773.95 SHORT ELLIOT HENDR CONTRACT PYM
117839 04/17/87 1,057.22 SHORT ELLIOT HENDR CONTRACT PYM
6,295.88 •
i 17555 04/20/87 114.00 SPECIALTY RADIO SUPPLIES
11TS55 04/20/87 868.00 SPECIALTY RADIO EQUIP
982.00 •
I
1 17S57 04/20!87 - --862.00 - ---- ---STAG EQUIP
IIi
862000862.00 •
117865 04/20/87 20.00 ST PAUL RAMSEY NED EXAM
r
117568 04/20/87 110.00 ST PAUL SUBURBAN BUS PROGRAMS
110.00 •
117869 04/20/87 8.65 ST PAUL BOOK SUPPLIES
8 •
117S76 04/17/87 525.60 -_STAR SPORTS —
M --
SUPPLIES
117S76 04/17/87 284.00 STAR SPORTS SUPPLIES
809.6 •
117877 04/17/87 25.65 STOCKTON DERRELL T SUPPLIES
25.65 •
s +s•
117897 04/20/87 10.00 SWANSON LYLE ENC LICENSE
10.00 +
1 17T15 04/20/87 17.78 TELEX COMPUTER PROD CONTRACT PYM
117T15 04/20/87 35.55 TELEX COMPUTER PROD -CONTRACT PYM —
117T15 04/20/87 17.78 TELEX COMPUTER PROD CONTRACT PYM
117T15 04/ 20/87 88.89 TELEX COMPUTER PRO CONTRA PYM
160.,00 •
Page: 12
r:rt.. .sr.+r yNw:v:'C. ...;ew "::.:• r..:r -. r:'.c. 1,. .. iticwet - '.7': .. x..._, ._
1987 CITY OF.MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
117T29 „ _ 04/20/8.7_ _ 322.19 -_ _ T. A. SCHIFSKY SONS CONTRACT PYM
117730 _ 04/80/87 34.99 TARGET PROGRAMS
117T30 04/20/87 6..26 TARGET PROGRAMS
41.25 +
117TSO 04/20/87 -_ -.. _ -- -_ -- . _. - --- _ -__ -- 1 _- --- T - -_J_ AUTO PARTS CONTRACT PYM
19.60 + -
117759 04!20/87 41.01 TOUSLEY FORD SUPPLIES
117T59 41_._01_ - — TOUSLEY FORD SUPPLIES
117T59 04/20/87 41.01 TOVSLEY FORD - - SUPPLIES - - - - - -
41.01 +
117T65 y04/20/87 111.73 TKDA CONTRACT_ PYM —
111 73 +
117078 04/20/87 118.00 UNITED ELECTRIC CO SUPPLIES
118.00
117079 04/80/67 44.95 UNITED STORES UNIFORMS
3 44. +
117U86 04/80/87 23.40 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL OXYGEN
23.40 +
117V50 _04/20/87 _ 42 . 06 VIRTUE PRINTING _ PRINTING117VSO04/20/87 4.`28 VIRTUE PRINTING — - PRINTING
117VSO 04/20/87 10.51 VIRTUE PRINTING PRINTING
i f 7V50 el .03 _ VIRTUE PRINTING _ _ PRINTING
ti 117V50 04/20/87 84.12 VIRTUE PRINTING PRINTING
117V50 04/20/87 54.68 VIRTUE PRINTING PRINTING
117V50 04/PO /87 1e. -__ VIRTUE PRINTING PRINTING
117W21 0 80/87 10.00 WA
ip
RUE V 8 LIES117WP1 _ 04/ . 7 WA R E AL SUP IE8
117W21 04/ / 0. WA - -___ - - -- SUPPL
117W21 04 20/87 4 .9 WA RUE VALU SU IE
Page: 13
s . .r... ., .r.rr •i+b.w..r..r ar r.s . i.w..r Y I.4.f ^r .P L . v .I :F -r .ri i i -r.s r..i•.u. a .. r
w
1987 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE _ A VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP
117W2i 4/20 ! 4 WARNERS ALU SUP
117W21 __ __ 0 /87 _— t WARNS TRUE . PL I E8
f
117W26 04/20/87 35.00 WASH COUNTY TREAS TRAVEL TRAINING
35.00 •
117W27 04/17/87 1 WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL SUPPLIES
1,200.00
ss• *s
117X30 -- -_ - 04/20/87 - - —5 84 - XEROX CORP LEASE EQUIP
117X30 04/20/87 8.74 XEROX CORP LEASE EQUIP
117X30 04/20/87 25.68 XEROX CORP LEASE EQUIP
117X30 04/20/87 - -- - - - -- _ - -- 40.52 XEROX CORP _ -- LEASE EQUIP - -_
117X30 04/20/87 25.68 XEROX CORP LEASE EQUIP
i t 7X30 04/20/8_ T 5 - 0 . 1 52 XEROX CORP LEASE EQUIP
156.38
117Z30
i1TZ30
1 7Z30 --
04/20/87
04/20/87`
0420/87
11TZ40 04/20/87
143.30
54 54
194.75 •
ZEP MFG CO
EP .. MFG CO_____
ZEP MFG CO
LEASE EQUIP
LEASE EQUIP
LEASE EQUIP
Z I EGLE IN LEASE E IP -
77.05 •
295142 04/17/87 37.80-RECKTENWALD C UNIFORMS
295142 04 17/ 37.REC C U
3
41, 951.FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL
510.76 FUND 03 TOTAL HYDRANT CHARGE
681.66 _11 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT
12, 965.40 FUND 36 TOTAL 83 -1 FROST AV AD!
1,464.71 FUND 45 TOTAL 84 -12 BEAM W OF
t , 480.48 FUND 50 TOTAL 85 -7 CRESTVW DR -
3,818.95 FUND 63 TOTAL -86 -3 CENTURY AVE
1 , 057.22 FUND 73 TOTAL 86 -15 WTR D I STR f
801 .40_FUND 90 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER Ft
7 789.FUND 96 TOTAL VEHICLE i EQUIP F
71 , 827 TO
i N 1) 1 U AT.L b - 1 1` 1 1
r•
t
L
it
r
fl 0
m
xEi
f I'
DATE 04/14/87
PROGRAM PR10
C I T Y 0 F M A P L . E W 0
PAYROLL CHECK R Ppom
f'
y - 17 -87
CHECK GROSS
NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY
09282 01-0109 GREAVU JOHN c 400.,00-
0i a@ C'-*W^- Qi fn-urr E p
09284 01-1318 BAS*GARY W 3254 00
09285 01 JUKE FRANCES L 3255 00
86 01—SOSB P"DE IQ% CIA NORMAN aw 00—
I D v A. %NJ &ON 0i Sumw a %4%AIT 1 VE
t
09287 02-1812 LAIS DONALD 2239w20
09288 02-9671 BEHM LOIS N 852m,25
DIVISION 02 CITY MANAGER 3091 a 45
3
0-1 tO-4474 JAHN mAirlml ly' Xx AE)Zf f tan
09290 10- 6523L SWANSON, JRw LYLE E 1001.06
DIVISION 10 CITY HALL MAINT 1719m31
13
09291 12-0166 CUDE LARRY J 242a40
4
Mb A ZUERC-1 1EN If
4 r-ft INV 0%
1-%—J—r —a
15
09293 12-5905 OSTER ANDREA i 665v 05
DIVISION 12 EMERGENCY SERVICES.1085. 05
Iz
09294 21-1078 FAUST DANIEL F 1848. 28
DIVISION 21 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 1846.28
5.0 09296 22-4432 MOELLER MARGARET*A
v WNW
973a71
51 092297 22-4446
09298
MATHEYS
kl GNA69-
ALANA
D E.-
K 868a 25'
52
53
nf w how a ll w
ID i v i St I Got A 1% ) 1 T 1 1855
57
sh1q a It a4=1 %up %d2• 27
f'
y - 17 -87
1-
DATE 04/14/87
PROGRAM PRIO
C I T Y 0, F M A P L E W 0
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER RE PC
135
4
sz
55
56
57
1,
CHECK GROSS
t
NUM EMPLOYEE NUMDER NAME
1455m 26
09314
PAY
STILL VERNON T 1308a 68
f;3 15 Ar2-94557 SKALMAN,DONALE)
092' 9 31 —2198 AURELIUS LUCILLE E 1982m 28
1-09-33rklet–31-48'r.
09316
B D
RAYMOND J
09301 31-9815 SCHADT JEANNE L 745u86
1359u64
09319 42-1577
Ant . 11 '.1
BANICK
L/my A D
JOHN
L
J
1455a -ON.
1408u3g
09320
DIVISION 31 CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATION
JOHN
Mh,-Volr-t-
2976w14
1232.78
09322 42-1930 CLAUSON
f3my
DALE.K 1357a 48 i
09323
3 2.4
09302 33-0547 KELSEY COON IE L 349.63
42-2884
MATeHA
PELT IER
t I T rr Ir (n In
Hi
F
a 09
1455o26
09326 42-2899
09304 33-4994 HENSLEY PATRICIA A 594m12
0 9305 33 -6105 CARLE JEANETTE E 621v37
33-0389 GREEN PH r L.L- A %--j C
t
it
D i v i SIL J- Tw-R
09307 41-1717 COLLINS KENNETH V 2864n68
09 08 41-2356 RICHIE CAROLE L 706w65
L s N
2 91
0931.0 41-3183 NELSON ROBERT D 2502a 285028
09311 41-7636 OMATH JOY E 720u25
HSON f:
D irt I !ON 41 p Li B L i rz E T'ji—A D M 1 N CJ-;7 fim--6-7-4
135
4
sz
55
56
57
1,
1 09313 42-0130 ZAPPA JOSEPH A 1455m 26
09314 42-0251 STILL VERNON T 1308a 68
f;3 15 Ar2-94557 SKALMAN,DONALE)W----t%3.j5:F a
09316 42-0990 MORELLI RAYMOND J 1332o68
09317 42-1204
i 3 4
STEFFEN
r%
SCOTT
r%A4 IT
L 1359u64
09319 42-1577
Ant . 11 '.1
BANICK
L/my A D
JOHN
L
J
1455a -ON.
1408u3g
09320 42-1660 BOHLL JOHN
Mh,-Volr-t-
C 1232.78
09322 42-1930 CLAUSON
f3my
DALE.K 1357a 48 i
09323
3 2.4
42-2063
42—".LjL5
MOESCHTER RICHARD M 1407w52
09325 42-2884
MATeHA
PELT IER
jOHN
WILLIAM
Hi
F
a 09
1455o26
09326 42-2899 SZCZEPANSKI THOMAS J 1031.88
DATE 04/14/87
PROGRAM PRIO
CHECK
NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME
C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REPO
GROSS
PAY
DIVISION 42 POLICE SERVICES 35146u95
09339
A 0
09341
09342
09344
09345
w2r'g 3 4 6
43-0009
4 01-466 6
43-0918
43-1789
43-2201
43-4316
KARIS
149 arm_ I It IV17
NELSON
GRAF
HeMA 4
YOUNG REN
RAZSLKAZOFF
f-j li
FLINT
STEPHEN
CAROL
DAVID
JAMES
DALE
D 1430. 90
J—a n
M 1369. 18
M 1405.48
T 55r -G$-
G 1394. 19
E 1396,68
A-1 A aAr-
09347
09348
43-7418
43-7791
BERGERON
MELANDER
JOSEPH
JON
09327,42-3243 WELCHLIN CABOT V 1048. 18
13910.49
LAN8 R* inl 1pr , - , D J i?
4W 09329 42-4775 PALMA STEVEN T 819..08
FIRE PREVENTION
09330 42-4916 HERBERT MICHAEL J 1371.88
JANET
1--4 22! 6 119 E) R E G R Ir rl L i r%
46-02389
46-4801
09332 42-7686 MEEHAN, J JAMES E 1441. `8
09333 42-7887 GREEN NORMAN L 1455s26
6 -RY
09,..35 42-8434 BECKER RONALD D 1332u68
09336 42-8516 HALWEU KEVIN R 18166 9O
J RTWON DE-RREL--
09338 42-9867 BOWMAN RICK A 1295*70
DIVISION 42 POLICE SERVICES 35146u95
09339
A 0
09341
09342
09344
09345
w2r'g 3 4 6
43-0009
4 01-466 6
43-0918
43-1789
43-2201
43-4316
KARIS
149 arm_ I It IV 17
NELSON
GRAF
HeMA 4
YOUNG REN
RAZSLKAZOFF
f-j li
FLINT
STEPHEN
CAROL
DAVID
JAMES
DALE
D 1430. 90
J—a n
M 1369. 18
M 1405.48
T 55r -G$-
G 1394. 19
E 1396,68
A-1 A aAr-
09347
09348
43-7418
43-7791
BERGERON
MELANDER
JOSEPH
JON
E
A
A
0
1228u47
1381.*48
DIVISION 43 PARAMEDIC SERVICES 13910.49
bff
09350 45-3333
3 1 'bnf 0 '9
WILLIAMS D UA NE
T-r-
J
a
1256a 68
DIVISION 45 FIRE PREVENTION 2688m56
09351
5 2
46-0183 RABINE JANET L 852w25
A. r-3j
09353
09354
46-02389
46-4801
IF A H N K E
BUYER
RYAN
JUL f E
SCOTT
MICHAEL
A
K
P
28 78 'tuj
756s141431e261
DATE 04/14/87 C I T Y O F M A P L E W O
PROGRAM P R I 0 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER REP(
CHECK
w r 1% 4 % — %of
DENNIS
V i 1.... %0 %..j t T 1.j
L 1 36. 96:
PRIEBE
CROSS
NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME PAY
M
j 09 355 46- -5519 NELSON KAREN A 852o25
1*irltrv lot
093 46--7236 FLAUGHER JAYEE L 868u
y DIVISION
I
46 DISPATCHING SE RVS 5564., 57
f
09 3 51- -0267 BA RTA MARIE L 702, 33
09 360 51-8993
i
CHLEBECN JUDY M 884 * 25
DIVISION 51 PUBLIC WORKS ADM I N 3751.26
09 361 52--0547 MEYER GERALD W
d
1118s25
f
93 63 52 - 1431F L U T Z DAVID P 1013a 05
09 52 -1484 RE I NE RT EDWARD A 110 ., 65
mss
09366 55 --4037 HELEY RONALD J 1062 , 65
09369 52
f
J 09370 52- -8314
1341
1
DIVISION
t
39
01 09 372 53- -1688
Q19375 53 --4671
09376 53 --6109
t
7 i
DIVISION
49
1 5I
5Z
53
e
54-
1
55
i!
i;
n t T
JOSEPH
WILLIAM
J 1 V-10 C , COD
8 1424, 86
C 1470u46
52 STREET MAINTENANCE
PRETTNER
CASS
115 18s 36
PECK
w r 1% 4 % — %of
DENNIS
V i 1.... %0 %..j t T 1.j
L 1 36. 96:
PRIEBE WILLIAM 1159,45
AHL—Ij Me
GESSELE JAMES T 1181.85
GE I SSLE R WALTER M 1 '6:47, 55
53 ENGINEERING 7703, 68
r
DATE 04/14/87
PROGRAM PRIO
C I T Y 0 F M A P L E W 0
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER. REPC
09384 59-1000
CHECK
DENNIS M 1148,25
GROSS
4AC- NAL
Cl Cil- IT pVEHIddsS— %mR %.d J6 I— I I A" 1. INLFF
NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER NAME
09386 61-0389 ODEGARD
PAY
4
1723w08
0938_r 61-1066 BRENNER LOIS 1 868,25
0937$ 58-1014 NADEAU EDWARD A 1121a50
1590 w It*-3-039
J 7
09380 58-1720 NUTESON LAVERNE S 1424u86
ROBERT
09381 58-2563 BREHEIM ROGER W 1061 a 05
P MA-8-a-Z-30-t
cy
YUKER WALTER A
0938 3 58-5993 OWEN GERALD C 1 121:85
DIVISION 58 SAN SEWER OPERATION 6856o44
09384 59-1000 MULVANEY DENNIS M 1148,25
Z, 60
n t J T Qn T &L
4AC- NAL
Cl Cil- IT pVEHIddsS— %mR %.d J6 I— I I A" 1. INLFF
4 Q H 8111
T
09386 61-0389 ODEGARD ROBERT D 1723w08
0938_r 61-1066 BRENNER LOIS 1 868,25
09389 61-2618 STAPLES PAULINE 1387.28
DIVISION 61 COMM SERVICES ADMIN 4327013
0 62-3790 ANDERSON ROBERT s 919.29
l.k 5 LINDORFFF D N-18 P MA-8-a-Z-30-t
09392 62-4097 YUKER WALTER A 81, 00
MAR IQH A MARK t t
05 q MH Dt/ L: lwtvI cc In 11 -1 7 It -7
17
50
52
53
S4
55
56
t
09396 62-8182 GERMAIN DAVID A 1085m77
DIVISION 62 PARK MAINTENANCE,6518,w42
e-
09398 63-1808
09399 63-3495
09400 ew 2"t — 4ri2~ 6w
DON
LINDORFF TODD
JOHANEK TODD
lvmvl A R G olnu
B
m 76,o88
55.00
406mgotwe 40
PROGRAM PR10
CHECK
NUM EMPLOYEE NUMBER
w
09401 63-6422
y 09403 63-8158
DIVISION 63
09404 64-0508
09406 64-2163
09407 64-4624
DIVISION 64
1 .. ', i IMA A art.cwwe i
MsA Mri.ririMM
09409 71-0551
09410 71-3174
117:in l. It .1 Q *7 Is
J 1050.86
400&L
D 50800
1762u64
JANET, M
B R EtAR A L
CHRISTINE.
JUDITH A
892u25
94-i-52
446. 12
433n32
2063m2l
OLSON GEOFFREY W 1701. 48
WEBWERTH JUDITH A 420.47
Ir i G191 ism 106VIE; Ea",r----F+ MIN 31 -a4
094 72-7178
09413 72-8505
EKSTRAND
JOHNSON
THOMAS
RANDALL
G 1092u92
L 1212w641
DIVISION 72 PLANNING 2305*56
09-414 31-0677
09 73-1942
006TR M
CARVER
m INJJ1E
NICHOLAS N 1059n45
f
t
DIVISION 73 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2450m71 .
09416 74-0776
0 9 4 17 7 4 9ftf
WENGER
GIRARD
ROBERT J 1159.45
2-&:Zw &1
DIVISION :74 H rm A 6 T H 3 E— G—,- T I (00NS
LAW11"EiNl%we"m 7
1% shIIke. 30
FUNDAIr 0 N rl— 1: 1%
I 229m4
51410=0 IT I
to—% In k 1 r% Ir in Ir
1421912u!g
4 1. d"ol 4 -w% d"% &w
961 Ill rl IOILr-vyu
PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER. REPO
GROSS
NAME PAY
TAUBMAN DOUGLAS
WftRf)-
PADGETT MARCIE
RECREATION PROGRAMS
GREW
F-L- L/I
SOUTTER
HORSNELL
NATURE CENTER
1 1% GO 1 0 5 rl C7
w-
t —42—
alActionbyCouncil,
MEMORANDUM
E n d o r d
Modif
TO: Actin Cit Mana Re* ected..—,..-,.-
FROM: Actin Cit En Date
SUBJECT: Beam Avenue Water Main
Cit Project 84-12
Plan Approval and Authorization of Bids
DATE: April 17, 1987
The desi consultant for the Beam Avenue Water Main project has
completed the plans and specifications for the installation of this
main. Copies will be available for inspection at the April 27 council
meetin
It is recommended that the council approve these plans and
specifications and authorize the advertisement, receipt, and openin
of bids b passin the attached resolution,
mb
RESOLUTION
APPROVING PLANS, ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed b the cit council on
March 9, 1987, plans and specifications for the installation of a
trunk water main alon Beam Avenue from the railroad brid to
approximatel 1,300 feet west of T. H. 61, Project 84-12, have been
prepared b (or under the dire'ction of) the cit en who has
presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1* Such plans and specifications, a cop of which are attached
hereto and made a part hereof,. are hereb approved and ordered placed
on file in the office of the cit clerk,
2. The cit clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for
bids upon the makin of such t . tinderimprovement such approved plans andp .
specifications. The advertisement shall'be published twice, at least
ten da before date set, for bid openin shall specif the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be publicl opened and considered b
the council at 10 a.m., on the 28th * da of Ma 1987, at the cit hall
a-nd that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the
clerk and accompanied b a certified check or bid bond, pa to the
Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota for 5% of the amount of such bid.
3. The cit clerk and cit en are hereb authorized and
instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time
and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The
council will consider the bids at the re cit council meetin of
June 8, 19870
3
MEMORANDUM
T0: Acting City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE NVOstment Agreement
DATE: April 16, 1987
PROPOSAL
It.is proposed that the Council authorize execution of the
agreement with E . F . Hutton & Comp and that the Bank of
nated as an official City depository for transactions and
Hutton & Company.
BACKGROUND
Action by Council,
Endorse
Ifo1f ie
ejet
Date
attached investment
New England be desig-
deposits with E. F.
Prior to November, 1985 most City i nvestment: transactions were made without the
assistance of a paid "outside" investment advisor. On November.6, 1985, the
Council authorized investments i -n the Franklin U . S . Government Securities Fund.
This mutual fund in -vests exclusively in Government National Mortgage Association
G,N.M.A..) securities. The investments of this mutual fund are managed by profes-
sional portfolio managers., So, indirectly, the Ci has, been "using the services
of outside professional investment managers ". since ,November, .1985. In April, 1986
the Council authorized investments in the Vanguard G . N .M..A. mutual fund primarily
because it was a no-load (i.e., no sales charge) fund.
Recently, representatives of two firms have requested that the City consider des i g -
nati ng them to manage part of the City ` s investment portfolio. The primary advantage
to the City would be that they supposedly. could obtain a higher return on investments
because they are able to devote all of their time to investment management. These
investment services require the payment of a fee based upon the amount invested. The
primary disadvantage to. the City is that investment management firms cannot guarantee
a high yield and their service charges must be paid regardless of performance.
However, City does have the option of cancelling an investment agreement at any
time.
The firms that expressed an interest in providing services to Maplewood were Piper
Jaffray Inc. and E. F. Hutton. The.proposal submitted by E. F. Hutton was the most
persuasive because of lower fees and documented performance -. Attached is more
detailed information regarding Hutton Securities Management and their personnel.
The performance record .of the HGSM model portfolio has been better than the average
on City investments.. City.- investments would have a higher average yield ifyield
the investments had an average maturity of 1.5 to 5 years l i k e the HGSM Model
Portfolio. However,- many City investments have a shorter maturity due to cash needs
of the City.
The fees charged by E. F. Hutton are 0.6/ of the asset value of the account. This
is less than Piper Jaffray Inc.,, which charges 1.0/ on the. fi $ and 0.75/
on the next $2, I.f the Council approves the investment agreement with E. F.
Hutton, $1,000,000,(the minimum they would accept) , would be deposited with them for
one ar. If their performance is satisfactory, more. would be deposited with themy
depending on City cash needs.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Counci authorize execution of the attached investment
agreement with E. F. Hutton & Company and that the Bank of New England be designated
as an official City depository for transactions and deposits with E. F. Hutton & Company.
DFF :1 nb
EFHutton
HUTTON GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MANAGEMENT
Hutton Government Securities Management (HGSM) is a proprietary
portfolio management service dedicated exclusively to the management
of U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities. It comes under the umbrella
of Hutton Asset Management (HAM), a division of the parent company
responsible for managing over $20 billion of assets ranging all the
way from common stocks to treasury securities. The funds under HAM's
management have consistently achieved top tier performance . The
same government bond professionals who have very successfully managed
portfolios at HAM are also being used to manage the HGSM portfolios.
HGSM is a discipline. It employs a consistent, fundamental approach
to identifying trends in the economy and thereby interest rates. To
accomplish this it uses the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment
Index as well as fundamental indicators such as consumer demand,
business demand, and Federal Reserve Board actions, to name a few.
The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index monitors the
spending plans of consumers on a monthly basis. After four and a half
years of study, the people at HGSM found that this indicator has the
best long term track record (the index is 35 years old) of accuratel
predicting the future direction of the economy.
Based on this index and based on other fundamental information,
portfolios are constructed to reflect either a defensive, a neutral or
a positive position. The average maturities of such portfolios are
1.5 years, 3.5 years and 5 years, respectively.
The most important and number one objective of this manager is to
protect principal; the secondary objective is to beat the one year
T -Bill rate b 3%-5%. The HGSM Model Portfolio has achieved the
following performance record:
1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 * 1985 *1986
5.9 15.81 15.68 24.32 8.55 18.51 18.73 12.5
Actual Performance
The Hutton Government .Securities Management Personnel
Thomas A. Belshe, whose responsibilities include heading the
Hutton Asset Management Group, is an Executive Vice President
of E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. and a member of its Board of
Directors. A graduate of Williams College, Mr. Belshe joined
Hutton in 1957. In previous positions at the firm, he served as a
Pacific North Regional Vice President and as a Regional Manager
of the Municipal Bond Department. Mr. Belsh e is a former Vice
Chairman of the Pacific Stock Exchange.
James Conroy is a First Vice President of E. F. Hutton and the Port-
folio Manager of Long -Term Taxable Investments for the Hutton
Asset Management Group. Mr. Conroy graduated from Muhlenberg
College with a B.A. in economics. He began with Hutton in 1983 as
a Portfolio Manager. His investment background prior to joining
Hutton included two years with the Equitable Investment Manage-
ment Company in New York, a subsidiary of Equitable Life Assur-
ance, and four years with the Insurance Company of North
America in Philadelphia. At Equitable Mr. Conroy was a Portfolio
Manager and Vice President; at I NA he served as a Portfolio Man-
ager for Fixed Income Investments in the Property and Casualty
Division.
L. Robert Cheshire, a Vice President of E.F. Hutton andithe Port-
folio Manager of Hutton Government Securities Management, has
been with the Hutton Asset Management Group since 1984. He
joined Hutton six years previously in Government Securities for the
Taxable Fixed Income Department. Prior to joining Hutton, Mr.
Cheshire's experience included serving as a Vice President in Gov-
ernment obligations for Charles E. Quincy & Co. in New York and as
an Assistant Vice President in Municipal Securities for the Bankers
Trust Company. He holds a B.A. from Rutgers University and an
M.B.A. from Fairleigh Dickinson University.
Ellen S. Friedenberg, Administrator for Hutton Government Secu-
rities Management, joined E.F. Hutton In 1982 in the Marketing
and Training Division. She has been with the Hutton Asset Man-
agement Group as an Assistant Portfolio Manager for Taxable Unit
Investment Trusts since 1983. Ms. Friedenberg received a B.F.A.
from Windham College and an M.B.A. from Fordham University.
Robert L. Oleott, National Sales Director of Hutton Government
Securities Management, has been with Hutton's Consulting Services
Department since 1983 and, in 1985 was named Consulting Group
Associate. Mr. Olcott has extensive experience developing and
implementing marketing programs for non - profit associations, local
governments, and corporations. He holds a B.A. from Drake Univer-
sity and an M. A. from Glassboro State College. In 1982 he was des-
ignated a certfied assoc executive by the American Society of
Association Executives.
F HL10n Form No. 7012
HUTTON ASSET MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT AGREEMENT
HUTTON ASSET MANAGEMENT
E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY INC.
71 Broadway
New York, New York 10006
Gentlemen:
The undersigned (the "Client ") hereby retains the Hutton Asset Management Division ( "HAM ") of E.F. Hutton & CompanyInc. ("Hutton") to act as investment advisor and to manage the assets of the Client's account (the "Account ") in accordance
with the following terms and conditions:
1. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
Hutton is to invest and reinvest the securities, cash and /or other investments held in the Account. Investments may bemadeinUnitedStatesTreasurybills, notes, bonds, or other obli ations of the United States federal agency or repurchase or
e Ireverse - repurchase agreements for any of the foregoing as w as any other money market instruments or money marketfunds. Client understands that all or a portion of the assets in the Account may be held in cash.
In connection with the advisory services being provided to the Client, Hutton is entitled to rely on the financial and otherinformationsubmittedbyClient. Client agrees to inform Hutton in writing of any material change in Client's circumstances
which might affect the manner in which Client's assets should be invested and to provide Hutton with any such information asitshallreasonablyrequest.
2. CUSTODIAL AND OTHER SERVICES
Client (or its designated agent) will be furnished with an advice for Account transactions, periodic account statements,
and, at least annually, a monitor or the Account detailing account positions and activity.
Client directs that the Bank of New England (the "Bank ") be appointed custodian for the Account. Upon its acceptance of
such appointment, the custodian shall hold custody of property delivered to it under this appointment; hold registered secu-rities in the name of its nominee; collect income on property subject to this appointment; collect matured and called securities;
maintain records of all principal and income transactions; and render reports as specified above (other than the monitor whichwillbeprovidedbyHuttontoClientandHAMbutshallnotbeobligatedtoprovidereportsorinformationtoanyotherperson
or governmental agency. Custodial fees in connection with the above - referenced services provided by the Bank will be paid
by Hutton. Client acknowledges that additional or differing custodial services or services provided by a custodian other thantheBankwillrequireadditionalfees.
The custodian will have no responsibility whatsoever with regard to the investment performance of the Account and will
not be liable for any action taken in good faith in reliance upon oral or written instructions of HAM.
The Custodian may terminate its appointment as, and Hutton may terminate the appointment of, the custodian under this
Agreement at will upon written notice by either party to the other and termination will become effective upon receipt of suchnotice.
3. FEES
Client will compensate Hutton a quaterly basis in advance for its services. Hutton's annual fee will be % of the asset
value of the account.
The initial fee will be due in full on the date the cash, securities or other investments of Client are accepted by the custo-
dian for the Account (the "opening date "), and will be based on the Account asset value on that date. The period which such
payment covers will run from the opening date through the last business day of next full calendar quarter, and the fee will be
pro - rated accordingly. Thereafter, the quarterly renewal fee will be based on the Account asset value on the last business dayofthepreviousquarter, and will become due the followin business day. If additional cash, securities or other investments are
accepted for management in the Account, an additional ?ee, pro -rated for the number of days remaining in the fee period, will
be charged and will become due on the date of such acceptance. All fees may be charged to the Account.
If this Agreement is terminated by Hutton or by a client subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( "ERISA "),
a pro -rata refund from the date of termination through the end-of the billing period will be made. No fee adjustment will be
made during any fee period for appreciation or depreciation in Account asset value during that period, nor shall any adjust-ment or refund be made with respect to partial withdrawals by the Client or upon termination of this Agreement by a non -ERISA Client.
The fees described herein do not include transaction - related costs incurred in connection with the execution and /or set-
tlement of transactions such as wire or delivery charges. Client understands that securities for or in the Account are pur-
chased or sold on a net basis and that the executing broker may have retained compensation in connection with such
transactions. Client further understands that Hutton account executives receive compensation in return for introducing clients
to HAM and for providing supplemental advisory and client- related services.
4. TRADING AUTHORIZATION
Client hereby grants Hutton complete and unlimited discretionar trading uthorization with respectappointsHuttonasagentandattorney -in-fact with respect same
y 9 pact to the Account andacttodiscretionandatClient's risk Y P e. Pursuant to such authorzaton, Hutton may, in its sole
the Accounta w Purchase, sell, exchange, convert and Otherwise trade the securities and other investments inswellasarrangefordeliveryandpaymentinconnectionwiththeaboveandactonbehalfoftheClientimattersnecessaryorincidentaltothehandlingoftheAccount. Client rants Hutton full authorization
n all other
lions to, engage in such transactions with and execute an
g to issue such instruc-
n connection with the manag of the Account. Hutton
n
part
agreement with the custodian as may be appropriate
the custodian. g utton will not be responsible for any action or failure to act onthe art of
This trading authorization is a continuing ne and shall remain
pursuant to the revisions of p
g ' n full force and effect until terminated by Client or HuttonPpgaph8ofthisAgreement. The termination of.this authorization will constitute a terminationofthisAgreement.
Client understands that Hutton and its affiliates perform, among ther thin
in th
g 9s, research, brokerage, and investment advi-sory services for clients other than those
performanc
particip e HAM .program. Client recognizes that Hutton may give adviceandtakeactioninthepceofitsdutiestosuchclients (including those who may also be participants in the HAM
o
ro-gram) which may differ from advice given, or in the timing and nature of action taken, with resp i
p
Agreement shall be deemed to impose upon Hutton any P Cent. Nothing in this
for Client any security or other investment which Hutton g ations t o Purchase or sell, or recommend for purchase or sale,utton or its affiliates may purchase or sell, or recommend for purchase orsale, for its or their own account, or for the account of any other client.
By reason of its investment banking or other activities Hutton and its affiliates may from time to time acquire confidentialinformation. Client acknowledges and agrees that Hutton will not be free to divulrespecttoitsadvisoryactivities, including its activities as investment advisor
g a or to act upon, such information with
o to Client.
5. EXECUTION SERVICES
Hutton is authorized to place orders for the Account with such broker /dealers as it deems appropriate.
the x
In the selection ofsuchbroker /dealers, Hutton may consider all relevant factors, includingfamiliaritwithsourcefr
9 e ecuton capabilities required, the importanceofspeed, efficiency or confidentialit
Or sold, as well. other rel v
Y y s om whom or to whom particular securities might be purchasedasanyeantmatters. Hutton may select broker /dealers which provide it with research or other trans -action relatedservices and such research and other services ma be s
i
Y u ed for its own and for other client accounts to theextentpermittedbylaw. In connection with transa ct ons effected for the Account, Client authorizes Hutton to establish accountsinitsnamewithotherbroker /dealers, including "omnibus" accounts established for the oseur fthanOneclient, where it is appropriate to do s0. P P o combining orders for more
1n no event will Hutton be obligated to effect an transaction f r
ulation or f
Y o Client which it believes would be violative of appl +cablestateorfederallaw, rule or re g o the rules or regulations of any regulatory or self - regulatory body.
6. CLIENT AUTHORITY
If this Agreement is entered into by a trustee or other fiduciary, such trustee or fiduciar re riswithinthescopeoftheinvestmentsauthorizedursuanttotheI .
Y p esents that the HAM program
reement. If Client i
p pan, trust and /Or applicable law and that he is duly author -ized to enter into this A 9 s a corporation, the signatoryon behalf of such Client represents that the executionofthisAgreementhasbeendulyauthorizedbytiorateaapproriatecorcon. I'
or the r0 teat f P P C lent undertakes to advise Hutton of any eventwhichmightaffectthisauthoritYppyothisAgreement.
7. PROXIES AND OTHER LEGAL NOTICES
Hutton will not be required to take an action or render any advice with res ect to the votin of rintheAccount, nor wil! it be obligated to render advice or take an acti
P g pones for securtes held
y on on behalf of Client with respect to securitiesinvestmentspresentlyorformerlyheldintheAccount, or the issuers thereof, which become theings, including bankruptcies. subectofanylegal proceed-
8. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement ma be terminated at will upon written notice b either art to the otheffectiveuponreceiptosuchnotice. The termination of the A r
Y P y er a n d termination will become
custodian under the Agreement. Such termini i
9 eement will automatically terminate the appointment of thetonwillnot, however, affect the liabilities or obligations of the parties under thisAgreementarisingfromtransactionsinitiatedpriortosuchtermination. U on the terminate
ation whatsoevert r
P • on ofthis Agreement, nether HuttonnorthecustodianshallbeunderanyobligOecommendanyactionwithregardto , or to liquidate, the securetiesorOtherinvestmentsintheAccountanditshallthereuponbeClientsexclusiveresponsibilitytoissueinstructionsinwritingregardinganyassetsheldintheAccount.
9. BONDING
Client agrees to obtain and maintain for the period of this Agreement an bond re uired r
a of such
y q pu suant to the provisions ofERISAorotherapplicablelawandtoincludewithinthecovera
uired b I w.
g bond Hutton and any of its officers, directors andemployeeswhoseinclusionisre
such v
q y a Client agrees to promptly provide Hutton with appropriate documents evi-dentin g co erage upon request.
10. VALUATION
In computing the value of an security or other investment in the Account, each security listed on any national securitiesexchangeshallbevalued, as. oft a valuation date, at the closing price for such security on the principal exchange where it is
traded. Any other security or Investment In the Account shall be valued In a manner determined In good faith to reflect fairmarketvalue. Any such valuation should not be considered guarantee of any kind whatsoever with respect to the value oftheassetsintheAccount.
11, NON-ASSIGNABILITY
This Agreement shall not be assignable by either party without the prior written consent of the other.
12. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement is made and shall be construed under the laws of the State of New York, provided that nothing hereinshallbeconstruedinanymannerinconsistentwiththeInvestmentAdvisorsActof1940oranyrule, regulation or order of theSecuritiesandExchangeCommissionpromulgatedthereunder.
13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and may not be modified or amended except by awritingsignedbythepartytobecharged.
14. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this. Agreement shall be held or made invalid by a statute, rule, regulation, decision of a tribunal or
otherwise, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and, to this extent, the provisions of this Agreementshallbedeemedtobeseverable.
15. MISCELLANEOUS
Hutton reserves the right to refuse to accept or renew this Agreement in its sole discretion and for any reason.
For the purpose of referring to this Agreement, the date of this Agreement shall be the date of acceptance by Hutton.
As used herein reference to persons in the masculine gender shall include persons of the feminine gender. References
in the singular shall, as and If appropriate, Include the plural.
All paragraph headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only, do not form part of this Agreement and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
All written communication to Hutton pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to HAM at the above - referenced address.
All written communication to Client shall be sent to the Client address of record unless Client designates otherwise in writing.
Client acknowledges receipt of Hutton's Investment Advisory Services Disclosure Document, Notwithstanding anythingtothecontraryherein, Client shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without penalty within five business days of the
execution of this Agreement.
Agreed to this day of 119
ACCEPTED:
E.F. HUTTG *: & COMPANY INC.
By:
Signature of Client
Capacity of Signatory
Client Address of Record:
Date:
C . - /
MEM Act by C aunc -11, %I
TO: Acting City Manager - Moc7'*
FROM: Finance Director e°
RES Fina for Project 86 -04
DATE: April 20, 1987
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that the Council authorize a transfer of $102,473 from
the Hydrant Charge Fund to the Construction Fund for Project 86 -04
County Road C Water Main) .
RACKGMIND
On March 23rd the Cou.nc-i l adopted the assessment roll for Project 86 -04.
The assessment roll adopted was based upon, a. financial plan that included
the financing of unassessed .costs by tax - increment. fund . Upon further
revi ew i t has been determi ned that i t ' i s not feasi bi e to use the tax-
increment funds for this project because the improvements are not related
to pending. commercial or resi de.nti al developments from - whi.ch a tax incre-
ment could be captured
The most appropriate method of , f i n.anci ng the. unassessed costs for Project
86 -04 at thi time is by a transfer from the Hydrant Charge Fund. One of
the primary purposes of this - fun:d is to finance water improvements that
are difficult to assess. The unassessed costs to be financed consist of
21,470 for the park property .near Cypress Street and $81,003 for main
ov.ers i zi ng, difficult construction procedures and extension of the water
main past nonassessabl e property.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council authorize a transfer of $1-02,473 from
the Hydrant Charge Fund to the Construction Fund for Project 86 -04 (County
Road C Water Main).
DFF:l nb
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Financial Transfer to Close Project 84 -10
DATE: Apri'1 20, 1987
PROPOSAL
Actil on b Co
Endorse
e ecte
It is proposed that the Council authorize a transfer of $40,071.52 from
the General Fund to the Construction Fund for Project 84 -10 (Connor Avenue).
BACKGROUND
Construction of Connor Avenue east of Highway 61 was .compl last
August. The financing plan for this project provides that the developer
pay the City five eq.ua.1 annual principal installments with interest.
The Construct.i en Fund for this project now has a def i ci't equal to the
amount due from the developer.
It is not practical to keep the Construction Fund for Project 84 -10
open for five years simply to record one transaction. each. year. The
best alternative is to transfer money from the General Fund to eliminate
the deficit and close the Construction Fund. In return, the General
Fund would receive the annual payment with, Interest from the developer.
BECOMMENDATI.ON
It is recommended that the Council authorize a transfer of $40,071..52 from
the General Fend to the Construction Fund for Project 84 -10 (Connor Avenue).
DfF: l nb
570M
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING AUTHORIZATION OF A PROJECT AND
HOUSING PROGRAM UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C (MUNICIPAL HOUSING PROGRAMS)
AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGEE REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND
BONDS PREVTOUSLY ISSUED TO FINANCE
THE PROJECT AND PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Council has previously received a proposal
from Beaver Creek Apartments Limited Partnership, a Minnesota
limited partnership (the "Company ") that the City undertake to
finance a certain Project and multifamily rental housing
program for such Project as .herein described, pursuant to
Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes (the "Act ") and on
December 27, 1985 authorized such project and program and
issued its $8,500,000 Variable Rate Demand Purchase Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Beaver Creek Apartments
Limited Partnership Project) ( the "1985 Bonds ") , to finance
such Project. The Project consists of the acquisition and
construction of a multi - family rental facility containing 180
units and related improvements including parking facilities in
the City.
2 . The Company now desires to ref and the 1985 Bonds
through the issuance by the City of its $8,500,000 Multifamily
Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1987 (Beaver Creek
Apartments Project). The Project as described above will
facilitate the development of rental housing within the
community; encourage the development of affordable housing
opportunities for residents of the City, encourage the develop-
ment of housing facilities designed for occupancy by persons of
low or moderate income and assist such persons in obtaining
decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they can afford;
encourage the development of blighted-or underutilized land and
structures within the boundaries of the City; and will
otherwise further the policies and purposes of the Act; and the
findings made in the Preliminary Resolution adopted by this
Council on February 11, 1985 with respect to the Project and in
the final authorizing resolution for the 1985 Bonds on
December 23, 1985 are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved.
3. It is proposed that, pursuant to 'a Loan Agreement
dated as of May 1 , 1987, between the City as Lender and the
Company as Borrower ( the "Loan Agreement ") , the City loan the
proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to refund the 1985 Bonds.
The Basic Payments to be made by the Company under the Loan
Agreement are fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay
2
I ifs
the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds
when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its
rights to the Basic Payments and certain other rights under the
Loan Agreement to First Trust Company, Inc., in St. Paul,
Minnesota (the "Trustee" ) as security for payment of the Bonds
under an Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 1987 (the
Indenture") between the City and the Trustee. The acquisi-
tion, construction, operation and occupancy of the Project will
conform to the terms and conditions of a Regulatory Agreement
the "Regulatory Agreement ") dated as of May 1, 1987 between
the City, the Company and the Trustee and a Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants dated as of December 1, 1985 and amended
as of May 1 , 1987 . ( the "Declaration ") , both executed by the
Company and to be recorded as a covenant and restriction
running with the land on which the Project is located. .
4. This Council, by action taken on February 11,
1985, and after a public hearing thereon, adopted a resolution
giving preliminary approval to a proposal to finance a project
substantially the same as the Project; and on or about
December 19, 1985, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency gave
approval to the proposed financing program for the Project.
This Council, by action taken on December 23, 1985, adopted a
resolution authorizing the Project and the issuance of the 1985
Bonds.
01
i A
I -Ilk
5. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds,
forms of the following documents have been submitted to the
Council for approval:
a) The Loan Agreement.
b) The Indenture.
c) The Regulatory Agreement.
d) The Declaration (not executed by the City).
60 It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
a) the Project described in the Loan
Agreement and Indenture referred to above
constitutes a Project authorized by the Act and
the financing program for the Project is
authorized by the Act;
b) the purpose of the Project and the
program for the Project is, and the effect thereof
will be, to promote the public welfare by the
acquisition, construction and equipping of rental
housing facilities for assisting persons of low
and moderate income within the City to obtain
decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals they
can afford;
c) the acquisition, construction and
installation of the Project, the issuance and sale
12
I If
of the Bonds, the execution and delivery by the
City of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the
Bond Purchase Agreement and the Regulatory Agree-
ment (collectively the "Agreements "), and the
performance of all covenants and agreements of the
City contained in the Agreements, and of all other
acts and things required under the constitution
and laws of the State of Minnesota and City
Charter to make the Agreements valid and binding
obligations of the City in accordance with their
terms, are authorized by the Act;
d) it is desirable that the Company be
authorized, in accordance with the provisions of
the Act and subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agree-
ment and Declaration, which terms and conditions
the City determines to be necessary, desirable and
proper, to acquire and install the Project by such
means as shall be available to the Company and in
the manner determined by the Company, subject to
the terms of the aforesaid agreements;
e) it is desirable that the Bonds be issued
by the City upon the terms set forth in the
Indenture;
5
1 /
f) the Basic Payments under the Loan
Agreement are fixed to produce revenue sufficient
to provide for the prompt payment of principal of,
premium, if any, interest on, and the purchase
price of, the Bonds issued under the Indenture
when due, and the Loan Agreement, Indenture and
Regulatory Agreement also provide that the Company
is required to pay all expenses of the operation
and maintenance of the Project,. including, but
without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and
insurance against all liability for injury to
persons or property arising from the operation
thereof, and all taxes and special assessments
levied upon or with respect to the Project
Premises and payable during the term of the Loan
Agreement, Indenture and Regulatory Agreement;
g) as provided in the Loan Agreement and
Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from or
charged upon any funds other than the revenues
pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not
subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any
Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any
exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay
any of the Bonds or the interest or premium, if
R
r
any, thereon, or the purchase price thereof, or to
enforce payment thereof against any property of
the City except the interests of .the City in the
Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the
Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall not
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or
equitable, upon any property of the City except
the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement
which have been assigned to the Trustee under the
Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that the Bonds
are issued without moral obligation on the part of
the state or its political subdivisions, and that
the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable
solely from the revenues pledged to the payment
thereof and that the Bonds shall not constitute a
debt of the City within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation; and
h) a public hearing on the Project was duly
held by the City Council on February 11, 19850
6. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and
the provisions of Section 9 of this Resolution, the forms of
the Agreements and exhibits thereto are approved substantially
in the form submitted and on file in the office of the City
7
1 11
Clerk. The Agreements, in substantially the form submitted,
are directed to, be executed in the name and on behalf of the
City by the Mayor and the City Clerk. Any other documents and
certificates contemplated by the Agreements or necessary to the
transaction described above shall . be executed by the
appropriate City officers. Copies of all of the documents
necessary to the transaction herein described shall be
delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in said
Loan Agreement and Indenture.
7. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its
Bonds, in the form and upon the terms set .forth in the
Indenture . and this Resolution The Bonds shall ma t-»ra anri ha
subject to mandatory purchase as set forth in the Indenture.
The principal amount of the Bonds shall be determined by the
Mayor, the City Clerk, the Bond Purchaser and the Company, but
not to exceed $8,500,000. The rate of interest on the Bonds
shall be such rate or rates as the Mayor, the City Clerk, the
Bond Purchaser and the Company shall agree to, but the net
interest cost shall not exceed 9.5% per annum.
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated, the original Bond
Purchaser, shall purchase the Bonds for an amount not less than
95% of the principal amount of the Bonds and the Mayor and CityY
Clerk are authorized to enter into the Bond Purchase Agreement
in a form approved by the City Attorney, The Mayor and City
D3
i
RM
Clerk are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the
Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the
Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Bond Purchaser.
8. The Mayor and City Clerk and other officers of
the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to,
the Bond Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and
records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other
affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the
facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts
appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and
control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified
copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore
furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to
the truth of all statements contained therein.
9. The approval hereby given to the various docu-
ments referred to above includes approval of such additional
details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such
modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions
thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the
City Attorney and the City officials authorized herein to
execute said documents prior to their execution; and said City
Attorney and City officials are hereby authorized to approve
said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any
instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City
herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval
of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof.
9
In the absence (or inability) of the officials auth-
orized herein to execute any of the documents herein referred
to, the documents may be executed by any officer or member of
the City acting in their behalf.
Passed: , 1987
Mayor
Attest
City Clerk
SEAL)
10
MEMORANDUM
TO: Actin Cit Mana
FROM: Cit Clerk
RE: Bud Transfer
DATE: April 20, 1987
Action b CouI
Endorse
Modified
ejected.......
Date
A bud transfer of $1150.00 is necessar from the
contin account to cover the cost.of the appraisal of the
Northernaire Motel. See attached letter from Cit Attorne
Patrick Kell for details,
BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING
STH AND CEDAR
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612) 224 -3781
JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR.
PATRICK J. KELLY
Mr. Kenneth Haider
Maplewood City Hall
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: N orthernaire Motel, Inc.
Our File: 86 -5872K
Dear Mr. Haider:
April 1, 1987
L
JANET WILEBSKI
LEGAL ASSISTANT
On November 17, 1986 we received a letter from the State of Minnesota Department
of Revenue with respect to George Trudell. Mr. Trudell filed with the Commissioner
of Revenue an Application for Reduction in the Assessed Evaluation of Northernaire
Motel, Inc. The Tax Identification No. of the property is: 09-29-22-13-0007-10
The Application, according to the State of Minnesota, requested that the assessed
value for the following years be. reduced:
1) The assessed value for the year 1981, taxes payable in 1982 be reduced from
169,163.00 to $131,585.00.
2) Assessment year 1982, taxes payable in 1983 be reduced from $167,490.00
to $131,585.00.
3) Assessment year 1983, taxes payable in 1984 be reduced from $182,722.00
to $128,585.00.
4) Assessment year 1984, taxes payable in 1985 be reduced from $178,222.00
to $124,085.00.
5) Assessment year 1985, taxes payable in 1986 be reduced from $178,022.00
to $124,085.00.
The above - captioned abatement had been recommended by the County Board,
the County Auditor, and the County Assessor of Ramsey County.
As you know, Minnesota Statutes §270.19 provides that where the reduction in
assessed evaluation or any property exceeds $100,000 the City, School District and
County in which the property is located may request a hearing to object to the reduction. 1a
The request for hearing on the abatement application had to be completed within twenty
20) days from notice. If request for said hearing was not made, then, in that event,
the hearing will be deemed to be waived and the application would proceed on its merits
to the Commissioner of Revenue.
Our office was directed to proceed in order to protect the time limit and file
an objection to the ap I attended the hearing, representing the City of Maplewood.
Mr. Kenneth Haider Page 2 April 1 1987
The County of Ramsey had three individuals including, Mr. James F. Stasson, SRA,
AMA Real Estate Appraiser, and the State of Minnesota Department of Revenue had
two representatives. After extensive cross - examination of Mr. Stasson, the State
of Minnesota indicated that .the County .Auditor and the County Assessor may not be
totally correct in the recommendation of abatement. The State of Minnesota Commissioner
of Revenues representative requested that we obtain an appraisal.
The subject property consists of 6.04 acres of land and the improvements are
for buildings. One of the buildings contains a motel office, coffee shop, bar and restaurant.
The remaining three buildings are one - story motel buildings with a total of 32 sleeping
rooms. Accordingly, it has been the City's position to monitor all major abatement
actions, in addition, this particular area on Highway 61 will have further development
since the Maple Leaf Drive -In is presently for sale.
We proceeded with retaining John J. Kenna, SAA as the appraiser. Mr. Kenna
has done extensive appraisal work in these types of actions for both the State of Minnesota
and the County of Ramsey. .Originally the costs of appraisal was to be in the $300
to $400 range, however, there was difficulty with respect to obtaining comparable
sales and evaluations which had small hotels or motels and 6.05 acres. As a result,
the costs of the appraisal was more than expected.
The result of the hearing has not been determined, however, this may discourage
future abatements requests by hotels or industry within the City of Maplewood. The
uniqueness of the property was also placed in consideration due to the apparent lack
of maintenance, obsolescence in physical plant, equipment and fixtures, as well as
building configuration.
If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
PJK:ks
C: Lucille Aureliusx--
Daniel Faust
B NNIGAN &KELLY, P.A.
Patrick J. Kelly
L:7 . /
MEMORANDUM
TO:City Manager
FROM:Associate Planner -= Johnson
SUBJECT:Rezoning
LOCATION:2444 Highway 61
APPLICANT:City of Maplewood
OWNERS:Robert and Flora Miggler
DATE:February 19, 1987
SUMMARY
Request
Act by C l o
Endorse,,
111od 10f 10
Re j eete,
Date
Move the CO, commercial office /M -1, light manufacturing zoning
district boundary to line up with the east or west roproperty line ofPPy
Lot Two, Block One, and Lot Two, Block Two,. in the proposed Miggler
Addition.
Reasons for the Request
19 The present CO /M -1 zoning district boundary cuts diagonally
through the middle of the subject lots. The applicant would like a
clear understanding of how the city wants these lots to be used to
develop a marketing plan.
2. The applicant has requested the subject lots to be zoned for M -1
use. Refer to the letter on Page 9.
Comments
The. subject lots do not need to be zoned for CO use to protect
GertenI s Pond or the homes to the north and east from possible
incompatible development. Rezoning to M -1 would be consistent with
the intent of the land use plan. M -1 uses on the two subject lots
should also not be incompatible with the uses on the CO zoning portion
of the site. Incompatible uses would generally involve outdoor
storage facilities which require conditional use permits. Through
this approval process, council can control the character of the area.
The uses southeast of Gervais Avenue and English Street are not
representative of M -1 uses permitted under present code. Code
specifically prohibits junk, salvage or wrecking yards in a M -1
district. Staff is investigating whether these uses existed before
the present code was adopted. If not, appropriate enforcement action
will be initiated.
Recommendation
Approval of the resolution on Page 17 to rezone the easterly portion
of Lot Two, Block One, and Lot Two, Block Two of the proposed Miggler
addition from CO, commercial office, to M -1, light manufacturing, on
the basis of:
r
1. The four standard findings for approval,
20 . The area does not need to be zoned for Co use to protect the
surrounding property from incompatible uses.
3. The. planning commission had previously recommended the entire
Miggler site for M -1 zoning.
2
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Area: Lot Two, Block One: 2.6 acres
Lot Two, Block Two: 3.1 acres
5.7 acres
Existing land uses: Truck - farming accessory structures. These uses
w i l l continue-as nonconforming uses., They are proposed to be removed
as part of the Miggler's development.
Surrounding Land Uses.
North: Highway 61 frontage road and undeveloped land owned by Hess
Kline (Royal Nissan). Mr. Kline will be requesting a rezoning from R-
1, single dwelling, to a commercial district. An official from °DNR
stated that a small portion of this property is above the wetland. A
survey is needed to be more precise,
East: Undeveloped property proposed as Lot Three, Block One, and Lot
Three, Block Two, and Miggler Drive in the proposed Miggler addition.
This land is zoned for CO, commercial office use.
South: Undeveloped property zoned for M -1 use and a warehouse use.
West.: Proposed Lot One, Block One, Lot One, Block Two and Miggler
Drive in the proposed Miggler Addition. This area is zoned for M -1
use. Three single dwellings are on these lots. The dwellings will be
removed when the land is redeveloped.
Past Actions
Council approved:
1. A rezoning from R -1 to CO for the easterly three - fourths of the
site (page 7). The applicant had requested a rezoning to M -1.
Council wanted to protect the integrity of the pond that adjoins the
site to the east and rezoned the area to CO rather than the requested
M -1 district.
The planning commission had recommended that whole site be zoned for
M -1 use.)
2. An amendment to the comprehensive plan to designate a minor
collector street from Highway 61 through the site to Gervais Avenue,
30 The Miggler Addition preliminary plat was tabled to 9 -22 -86 and a
rezoning from M -1 to CO was initiated for proposed Lot One, Block Two.
9- 22 -86: -
Council conditionally approved the Miggler Addition preliminary plat
for nine commercial lots (page 8) .
1- 12 -87:
A motion to approve a rezoning from M -1 to CO for the westerly
portions of the subject lots failed for lack of four votes in favor,
1- 26 -87:
Council initiated a rezoning to adjust the CO, commercial office/M-1,
light manufacturing zoning district boundary to coincide with the west
or east property line of the subject lots,
Planning
1. Land use plan designation: BW, business warehouse.
2. Policy criteria from the plan:
a. Page 18 -31 states industrial uses found in the BW, business
warehouse classification., "include governmental and public
utility buildings and structures, storage and warehousing
facilities, wholesale business and office establishments, cartage
and express facilities, radio and television stations and other
industrial uses of a lower - intensity nature."
b. Page 18 -5 states "whenever possible, changes in types of
land use shall occur at center, mid -block points, so that similar
uses front on the same street, or at borders of areas separated
by major man -made or natural.barriers."
3. Compliance with land use laws: Section 36 -136 states:
a. The CO, commercial office district, is established primarily
to provide areas for the development of professional and
administrative offices, related uses together with supportive,
low intensity commercial uses in locations in close proximity' to
residential areas where such uses can conveniently serve the
public, and to create a suitable environment for such uses and
buildings specifically designed for their purposes, located on
sites large enough to provide room for appropriate separation of
uses, landscaped open spaces and off- street parking facilities.
b. The CO district is intended to be located primarily on
heavily traveled streets or adjacent to commercial or industrial
districts and is designed to lessen the impact of these uses on
residential areas."
c. Section 36- 189(b) states "No building or exterior use, except
parking, may be erected, altered or conducted ( in a M -1 district)
within three hundred fifty (350) feet of a residential district
without a conditional use permit." This provision would protect
the integrity of the property to the north of proposed Lot Two,
Block Two, in the event council were to deny a rezoning from R -1
to a commercial designation for that property. (See Surrounding
Land Uses - North.)
4
d . Refer to page 13 and page 14 for the uses permitted in the
M -1 and CO zoning districts.
e. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for approval of a
rezoning. Refer to the resolution on page 17.
Procedure
10 Planning commission recommendations
2. City council decision
Attachments
1. Hazelwood Neighborhood Land Use Plan Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Miggler Addition (property owner's desired zoning)
4. Property owner's letter
5o Letter from the Bergs (property to the south)
6. M -1 zoning district
7. CO zoning district
8. Area zoning map
90 Resolution
5
REVISED
3-25-85
4 -08 -85
8-20 -85
10 -09 -85
11 -08 -85
7-07 -88
9 -Ob - NO Interchange
Vadnals Heights i
EMMUNIUM
1.
i
i
major collector t
f '
d
M • • O`I • D i
i ptito
ltd. ?
A- SC ca
J
1Y%
C
t
u
C
a
W
0
lim
O
e
O
u
O
E
principal arterlsl 694
InlsrclnnQe
SC - 1-- Tr - -T
tits M t w 1 n W M M KMM M O ii M U M Intow " r
o. . D
I collector
RB 0 . _
DC "Ant"~ 0 `
O ;
s E A
cam ve -
Utter' erai
1 'SO
11 V r of
11 *
Or
0
ps 11
fill -
1 7 # fern
10 MAR
R V
S
os OS ro
xx - X,
SC
U I1
Mann RL
r
N ph a 3
In r ha ip•
CO
c
HAZELWOO
NEIGHBORHOOD'I AND USA PLAN
Council— initiated
Rezoning (M -1 to CO)
E Attachment 1 i
Hess Kline (owner of Royal Nissan)
will be requesting a rezoning to a
commercial use for this area.
OTE 19. 14, 17 AND 10
ADS ,GARDEN LOVE CONNOR AVENUE
1
aao 1 .• 1•
I 1 / 711-tANION G AND _ CITY OS
1 . O ANTO MAP%SWO00 I `• _-. •- -.• -
I ,, -- ''fir I' • _ , '
i Q "
LOCK 2
i . i • s ,.-
4
CITY OF
sou
0 J-1 pip %
300* 1 Ab SOW
a -- DRIVE - :•_ _ _ _
I • `---r •
BLOC I
somej1 • 1 I • J \ .I / • .
1 / : • STREET
1 T i ` • / f 1 r EXTENSION
SAM
4 •
CITY OR
06. MAPLEWOOD
6"a TORE IN
V. RICNAROP COMPANY - -004 • • - J.
3"t ASSOCIATES ,- I • I f • • 1
r
GERVAIS ---- ;AVENUE --r= =— - - -' - - -- -- % -
t • 1fPADLOCK
YINISTOR!L M
IOIIDTRMLE DTE GROUP W
l
W
N
T
r
PROPE LINE / ZON IN .G MaP
Zoning as amended on September 8, 1986.
Note: The Mi ggl er Addition Tot lines are shown only for `Y o illustration.The final plat has not been approved.
Attachment 2
lop
NS 0A11N11 l0T• CONNOII AWE Pour 1 a •'` y ' _
a.
US ...............
sOVAL " --- - --
log so at on A00
t1 J
I , •' • • 0/Nt /A114861 •.••- • -."- COT ff/ ; \ •, , •••:.• ••
17
It
y • • • ••. •••. •'••• •••• •
o;
0 or •
fir"
ti .. ...f.• •...••• ...•... t • /
yox • • •j • • to / • • • • - •o env OF
orI 1•
VCAl
I ••,, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ,/ ,/ • ; _'• ; mow •• +
w, ` , ; I• !
fI A • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I •- I 1 • •
1 • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • \ / • •ro . - D-1
1 ••• / • Io.•• — "DRIVE ,-- • • : t
4Z : : •.•: •: • Yip `. I •". '' ,••• ,• + .._rs.. i•_•Z. : 0 • :
a4 : •::::... •• :: -- • Or
1w
4a 7 e
1 ::. • • :ti •::..: :::... . ..•' . ' . .
3 :.•. .•.... .• • :. `.1 . :it' ` • '' i' • STREET -
1 • •: • : • : : :: :•• :: • •• •••• •J ..:t. :::.:.: ; !....... : { • t ; 1 i Ell ENSION
110 •
r 1 •: • • • 1 • \ GT• OI •
t . j ./ : ; ' .•• r •__ • -• •`, ` . i ; , YA/\,t *800 '.
1 .. • - • ,. : 0l0 TOIIttTN IMC./ , .
of
toi
11
AVENUE t _ T• - - - - -=
4,
Pact OCR ' • •
t•Mp !<Tp11AOE
h
r
s
s Taws tnit"*$
t
w
a
MIGGLER ADDITION
Preliminary Plat approved 9- 22 -86)
Applicant's desi red M -1 zonin r
8 Attachment 3
B. B. CHAPMAN AICP
365 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD, ST. PAUL, MN 55101 (612) 221 -0401
January 20, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Municipal Administration Building
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood., MN 55109
RE: Miggler Property Zoning
Site of September 22, 1986 Council Approved Preliminar Platat
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Miggler family has resided on the property for over 100 yearsanddeservestheopportunitytoredevelopthispropertyfora
sound new use. Orderly successful development requires the
coordination and cooperation of the City and the Owner.
Initially the Miggler owned properties of 32.44 acres were zoned
primarily R -1 Single Dwelling Residence District with the
westerly 400 feet zoned M -1 Light Manufacturing district. The
Migglers simply proposed rezoning the R -1 portion of their land
to M -1 and the Council, on September, 1986 zoned all R -1 land to
C -0 Commercial Office which severely limits developmentpotential. Present zoning in the vicinity is as shown on the
exhibit entitled PRESENT ZONING (Page 7),
On September 22, 1986, the Council'in'itiated zoning consideration
of the M -1 zoned Miggler property to coordinate the zoningboundarylineswiththePreliminaryPlatasadoptedbyCouncilon
the same day. A Council - Public Hearing in this regard was held
on January 12, 1987 and Council action was to expunge the
record.
This letter is submitted as an amendment that updates the extent
of M -1 as proposed in my letter of October 20, 19860
PROPOSAL
It is proposed that the Council amend the zoning district
boundaries in order that the following lots of the approved
Preliminary Plat be zoned M -1:
Lots 1 & 2 Block 1 Miggler Addition
Lots 1 & 2 Block 2 Miggler Addition
These lots have a total area of about 10.8 acres and are depicted
on the exhibit entitled PROPOSED ZONING (Rage $).
Urban Planning and
Development Services Attachment 4
9
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION
1. Frontage Road properties will
visibility, greatest opportunity
and very well may be the key to
area for both the C i t y and the 01
some land is important to the
public improvements,
have the greatest
for sound development
the success of this
wner. Early sale of
costly provision of
2. Our further review of the site in light of the
topography adjacent to the frontage road, parking
requirements and development potentials reveal the need
to have large lot development capability. Zoning two
lots in each block provides the opportunity for five
acre or six acre developments in each block. Many
potential business may require two lots to accommodate
their needs and would simply be excluded from
development if only one lot per block were zoned M -1.
3. District provisions for C -0 present a severe limitation
of the variety of uses compared to the M--1 provisions,
4. The original classification of frontage road property
is presumed to be well planned and intended to be more
or less permanent. It appears important for the City
to show either some mistake in zoning or that the
character of the neighborhood has changed to.an extent
that no reasonable use could be made of the M--1 zoned
land.
Reduction of the amount of M -1 zoned developable land
by the City would be a mistake. Zoning only a total of
two lots as M--1 amounts to a substantial loss to the
Owner of land available for the variety of sound uses
for this development.
5. we know of no private objection to M--1 Zoning of four
lots as proposed and seriously doubt that there would
be any objection at a public hearing.
It is recommended that the Council support the proposed M -1
zoning of four lots and cooperate with the Migglers in the
successful improvement of one of the few remaining large
potential development areas in the City of Maplewood.
Sincerely,
B. h man AICP
CC* R. Miggler
G. Rehnberg 10
LEONARD E. LINDOUIST RICHARD B. SOLUM
LAURESS V.ACKMAN
GERALD E. MAGNUSON
EDWARD M. GLENNON
MELVIN I.ORENSTEIN
ROBERT J. SHERAN
ISRAEL E. KRAWETZ
EUGENE KEATING
JAMES P. MARTINEAU
RICHARD J. FITZGERALE
PHILIP J.ORTHUN
JOHN A. FORREST
WILLIAM E. FOX
JERROLD F. BERGFALK
DAVID M. LEBEOOFF
JOHN H. S.TROTHMAN
DAVID G. NEWHALL
KURTIS A. GREENLEY
ROBERT V. ATMORE
PATRICK OELANEY
HOWARD J. KAUFFMAN
RONALD G. VANTINE
JOHN B. WINSTON
LAURANCE R. WALDOCH
THOMAS H. GARRETT =
DARYLE L. UPHOFF
DAVID J. DAVENPORT
MARK R.JOHNSON
RICHARD A. PRIMUTH
R. WALTER BACHMAN
JEFFREY R. SCHMIDT
TIMOTHY H. BUTLER
ROBERT G. MITCHELL, JR.
J. MICHAEL DADY
J. KEVIN COSTLEY
ROBERT J. HARTMAN
JOSEPH G. KOHLER
MARY E. CURTIN
RICHARD D. MCNEIL
DONALD C. SWENSON
BRUCE A. SONJOUR
JAMES P. MCCARTHY
STEVEN J. JOHNSON
RICHARD IHRIG
RODERICK I. MACKENZIE
THOMAS G. LOVETT IY
DAVID B. WESCOE
LINDQUIST & VENNUM
4200 IDS CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -2205
TELEPHO (612 371 -3211
TELEX 29 0044
TELECOPI ER (612) 371 -3207
CABLE: LIN MINNEAPOLIS
WAYZATA OFFICE
740 EAST LAKE STREET
WAYZATA, M I N N ESOTA SS391
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
LYNN M. ANDERSON ANN M. PARRENT
THOMAS E. GLENNON DAVID L. SASSEVILLE
RENEE J. SELIG DAVID A. DONNA
TERESA B. BONNER DENISE D. REILLY
JOHN R. HOUSTON JONATHAN M. BYE
DENNIS M. O'MALLEY TIMOTHY R. BAER
EDWARD J. WEGERSON TIMOTHY S. MCINTEE
DANIEL J. SHERAN J. ROBERT PAULSON, JR.DAVID A. ALLGEYER JOSEPH A. THOMSON
GREGORY P. MILLER JOSEPH W. DICKER
TERRENCE J. FLEMING ANN L. IIJIMA
N. ROLF ENGH ELIZABETH G. ABY
RICHARD T.OSTLUND KATHARINE N. HELMS
DEBORAH M. REGAN WALLACE G. HILKE
MARTIN R. ROSENBAUM CHARLES P. MOORSE
ELINOR C. ROSENSTEIN PATI JO POFAHL
ROSANNE H. WIRTH LUKE H. TERHAAR
DEBRA K. PAGE MICHAEL J. YOUNG
MICHAEL D. OLAFSON
SUSAN E. BARNES OF COUNSEL .
JOEL H. GREEN NORMAN L. NEWHALL
DAVID L. HALLETT
STEVEN E. RAU RETIRED
CHARLES R. WEAVER, JR.THOMAS VENNUM
January 13, 1987
City of Maplewood Office
of Community Development
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Miggler Truck Farm Property and Proposed
Rezoning Thereof
Gentlemen:
We represent Berg and Berg, a Minnesota partnership,
which owns the property to the south of the Miggler property.
The Berg property is legally described as the West 1020 feet of
the East 1320 feet of Lots 19 and 20, W. H. Howard's Garden
Lots.
Recently, Mr. and-Mrs. Berg, who are the partners of
Berg and Berg, were advised of a proposed rezoning of a portion
of the property located to the North of their property. The
Bergs first wanted me to advise you that their address is
Post Office Box 1150, Clearlake Oaks, California 95423. All
notices concerning their property should be.sent to them at
that address, and such notices should also be copied to
We have had a very difficult time receiving notices from the
City of Maplewood, as everything is addressed to an address in
Bloomington, and the Bergs have some difficulty receiving mail
when it is addressed in that manner. Again, therefore, for
future mailings please see that the partnership is sent notices
at the California address stated above, and that all such
notices are copied to me.
Secondly, as we advised the City Council in August, 1986,
the owner of the property located to the south of the Miggler
property does not want any action taken by the 'City which
would adversely im act the M -1 zoning of the Berg ro ert .
Attachment 5
L I N D O U I S T & VE N N U M
City of Maplewood Office
of Community Development
January 13, 1987
Page Two
We went on „record in _August of 1986 that we opposed the rezoning
of the Miggler prope_rtyrom, M -1 to 1CO3 and while we do not
believe that the recent rezoning request to change the balance
o"te:'Mc:cier property _ f rom M -I: to CO a verseiv impacts _the
Berg proPert , .we take this opportunity_ to ag ^ n n state- the ^ „
opposition of the Bergs to any change from the M -1 zon inch .y..++v.vlrar'.wP y:.+..:iaac ;. w. r. •..wk e_- .w:......:. ..-. ..:: +..... n4^ .... ... ... ,. _..... -. ...... ., Grt'r. . ..,.. ...- .w ia ... .....*r.- .`^wc.te .m..wO1 . . d' t% ' R 'SOYlA4'N3iV1aA71CWYCQlSJt'+ M. +OF /.rY.'L^ F•Te'w•
We request that this letter be made part of the City's
files, so that the position of Berg and Berg is clearly set
forth in the City's records
Sincerely,
LINDW SST & TENNUM
John `B . Winston
Jsw /dmc
cc: Berg and Berg
12
1 .
DIVISION 9. M -1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING - FACZ UItIN( DIS I ftlC *
Sece . 36 -186. Permitted uses
The following uses are ermit •p ted in the M -1 District, providedthattnousewhichisnoxiousorhazardousshallbeer 'p milted.
a) Any use listed as a permitted use in •a $C Business andCommercialDistrict, if the property is not des'p y designated forLSCLimitedServiceCommercialorRMResidentialMe-dium density use on the city's comprehensiveP plan.
b) Wholesale business establishments.
c) Custom shop for making articlesg or products sold on thepremises.
d) Plumbing, heating, conditioning, •g, itioning, glang, pantng, poperhanging, roofing, ventilating Anil eledrical o • •
carpentry,
c " t cblacksmithshop, soldering or welding shop.e) Printer's shop.
0 Place of amusement, recreation or asse
g) Bottling establishment.
h) Manufacturingg assembly or processing of
O Canvas and canvas products.
II) Clothing and other textile roductsIII) Electrical e
P .
1 equipment, appliances and su lies exceptppeptheavyelectricalmachineryIV) Food products, except meat, volt orpry fish.V) Jewelry, clocks or watches.
VI) Leather products.
VII) Medical, dental or drafting •VIII) Musical inst g quipment, optical goods.ruments.
IX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical roducts
n
p rubber productsandsyntheticthetictreatedfabrics.
X) Small products from the following ev'g p lonely preparedmaterials: cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair Bornpaper, plastics or shells. '
XI) Sporting goods.
X11) 1'00! dye d pattern making or similar small ma-chine shops.
s (XIII) Wood products.
f (i) Carpet and r •p rug cleaning.
0) Laundryy, y cleaning or dyeing plant.
k) Laboratory, research experimental or testing.s .
I) Offices,
m) School.
n) Warehouse.
o) Accessory use on the same lot Zvi t.li •Ait Cl19toinitt lIy i11Ct-dental to any of the ; above ermi tted •p uses, including anapartmentforsecuritypunpases_
13 Attachment 6
DIVISION 6. CO COMMERCIAL OFFICE DIST111c'1' -
Sec. 36 -136. Purpose and intent.
a) The CO Commercial Office District is esaal • •established PrimarilytoprovideareasforthedevelopmentofProfessionalandadininis-
trative offices, related rises together with sui > )ortive 'low itit etgrt
commercial uses in locations iii close Proximity to residential areawheresuchusescanconvenientlyservethepilblic, att(l tc) c.rent:e asuitableenvironmentforstickusesacidbuildhiss ec•inll c es'K 1 v ! ., rf,rieclfortheirpurposes, located Mi Rites large enough to provide rootcc for
appropriate separation of tiseq, lands ca )ed c e.tt s ric•rg ntic c,t E ! If
street parkitig facilities.
h) This district is intended to he locntecl tritcrrt ' c .•t rely ti lit ,r rlvtraveledstreetsoradjacenttocommercialcarhidiist.rial dititriog,and is designed to lessen the impact of these uses uti resid
areas. (Ord. No. 380, § IUU, 1.16.75)
errlril
Sec. 36 -137. Pertnitted uses.
In a commercial office district, unless otherwise rovidec '
ti or tiq
p 1 tai t.lscltatiter, no building a of laird shall be. erecte st.rtic• mrnllyalteredorexjmnded, except for one or more of the followit, gr •t* .
a) Professional offices;
b) Administrative offices;
c) Medical and dental offices and clinics;
Sav
d) Financial offices, stock brokerages, hanksg nricl iiigs andloads, real estate offices and other eneral 'g business offices;rces;
e) Related commercial uses:
Incidental services, such as restaurants pharmacies midretailsaleswhichserveprimarilytheoccupantsandpn-Irons of the permitted office use, when conducted withinthesainebuilding. Related commercial uses stroll ticit ex-ceed twenty -five (25) percent of the total net floor arethebuilding.a of
Supportive commercial uses:
The following free standing uses iiin lie) •y errirrt (c cl trpotiapprovalbythecitycouncilofnspecialexePI)tio n: S ,e_cialty or gift stores, office supply, t.ic:ke
t
t netic.y, f.rsivE.i
service, otiticinns acid sin filar uses. The rises provided forinthisparagraphmaybethesoleuseofaparticular
property or building, or may be cotnbitied wit.li nriy per-mitted or conditional uses allowed iti the district uponccilnWiancewiththenecessaryystiecin1exr.ctittcti or spe-cial use procedures. (Ord. No. 380, § 101 1-16-75)
Sec. 36 -138. Conditional uses.
The following uses are permitted in a CO District sulisecttietit toreviewandapprovalofaspecialusepermit:
Attachment
i
i •
ZONING a1, t aft
a) Medical and dental laboratories, not - including the mattuble-
ture of pharmaceutical or other product for g sales
and distribution;
b) Public and quasi - public rises appropriate to the dist.rict., sttrlt
as hospitals, convalescent hospitals, and professional, busi-
ness and technical schools;
c) Public utility and service buildings, structures mid uses ap-
propriate to the district:
It is the intent of this parngraph to I)rc)vi(le f'()r rises whicic
sut)ply public or quasi - public services wliich are ()f in smb.
stantially automated nature or require only periodic t)vam-
tenance, such as water pumping stat.imis, tele0tcftte r
or switching facilities and similar u.Res. it ig not ititetl(le
that office facilities, maintenance. disWatching clepols or
any use which generates regular daily use or traffic wmild
fall within this definition.
d) Rectarirants:
In keeping with the intent and put of the Co District,
a restaurant use does not include a drive -itt or tatty res -
taurant commonly referred to as "i'nst f od "' or "f ra ii -
chise" wherein the emphasis is on autc)t»c)bile c,riet)1 t -d
clientele or where any sizeable prc)f)c )rtic)tt ()I* the total
activity is involved in takeout order; intend fi)r cmt -
sumptio n cutter than within the building. (jttestimis ()f'
the amAicability of this definition to an ittclividtt;tl pro-
posal shall be reviewed by the planning cote missic)tt, which
shall forward a recommendation to the city council f'()r
final determination.
e) Any other office use which is determitied to) be the s: ims
general character as the above uses. (Ord. No. 38% § 102
1- 16 -75)
i
I
15
C
arr of
F
F
e•
E
R
t
o
1 t
W
R
IUll
V •r IUNT r
L--" •.J
4116 R 2)
V F 44
F
r +
w
N
i N
L C
S
i `E N • a C
all 1
tee
A F
8C
Lot M I R Puo 1 1
R tr
4oaa . R2 ..._2
a2 R F
W x'
r.
F 1T
or
f
J
r
R N
R cof-A Q L
R z
R -, Ml
R [ Y
MI
I
M - 1
MI
R2.' R = R
P ._.
L
R
ei.4KE R j L
R orZi
MI
R2 R
4
R2
I F
wt t
ems•
S
AREA
ZONING. MAP
Miggler Property
Fi
r 16
t
fl r •
r •- . w . ..,.. r . -. . a.: .,.y -v+.. a .. • y.
Attachment 8
s
1
l
r
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the day of
1987 at 7 p.m. _
The following members were present:
w
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from CO,
commercial office, to M -1, light manufacturing, for the following -
described property:
The easterly portions of Lot Two, Block one, and Lot Two, Block
Two, Miggler's Addition.
This property was known as 2444 Highway 61, Maplewood, prior to
platting as the Miggler Addition.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows.
1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article
VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on March 2, 1987. The planning commission recommended to
the city council that said rezoning be.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
1987 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above- describeO rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public
welfare.
Attachment 9
17
4. The proposed change would have no- negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools.
5. The areas does not need to be zoned for CO use to protect the
surrounding property from incompatible uses.
6. The. planning commission. had previously recommended the entire
Migler site for M -1 zoning.
Adopted this day of , 198.7o
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of
1987 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full,
true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to
this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1987.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B.MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MARCH 2, 1987, 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
i
4
i
Chai rman Axdah 1 called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL F
E:
Commissionerx,Lester Axdah1 Present (Chairman)
Commissioner Richard Barret Absent
Robert Card i 1 PresentCommissioner
Commissioner She Fi of a Present
Commissioner Lorai ne Fi cher Present
Commissioner Je rey Ha son Present
Commissioner Den i s La son Present
Commissioner Geor a Ro sbach Present
Commissioner Ralph S1 tten Present
Commissioner Marvin igmundik Present
Commissioner David i tcomb Present
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTE
A. February 2, 1 87
Commissioner Fi cher mov d approval of the minutes of February 2, 1987
as submitted.
Commissioner L rson secon d Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Cardinal
Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Rossbach
Abstain--Commissioners Axdah 1, . Fi of a,
Sietten, Sigmundi k,. Whitcomb
IV. APPROVAL OF/AGENDA
Commissioner Cardinal moved app oval of the agenda as submitted.
Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes - -all
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
to
VI. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
VII. COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Rezoning: 2444 Maplewood Drive (Niggler)
Associate Planner Johnson said the applicant is requesting to move the CO,
commercial office /M -1, light manufacturing zoning district boundary to line
up with the east or west property l i n e of Lot Two, Block One, and Lot: Two,
Block Two, in proposed Migglee" Addition.
The applicant, Flora Mi gg 1 er, 2444 Maplewood Drive, spoke regarding the
12 years the. rezoning has been pending and the considerable cost involved.
She stated her desire to have a decision made on t h i s request.
Gal a Rehnberg, marketing consultant, spoke in behalf of Robert and Flora
Miggler.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved approval of the resolution on Page 17 to rezone
the easterly portion of Lot Two, Block One, and Lot Two, Block Two, of the
proposed Mi gg l er addition from CO, commercial office, to M -1, light
manufacturing, on the basis of:
1. The four standard findings for approval.
2. The area does not need to be zoned for CO use to protect the surrounding
property from incompatible uses.
3. The planning commission had previously recommended the entire Miggler
site for M -1 zoning..
Commissioner Sletten.seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Cardinal,
Fi of a, Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Sletten,
S i gmu nd i k, Whitcomb
Nayes-- Rossbach
B. Street Plan: Highwood to Mailand Road
Chuck Ahl, Acting City Engineer for the City of Maplewood, presented the
street plan concept.
A commissioner questioned why it was the city's obligation to contruct
Sterling Street rather than a developer constructing it. Mr. Ahl responded
that because of the heavy emphasis on development in t h i s area, it is felt
that the city will have to provide the water or eliminate development in
this area. In order to provide this water, the connection must be made
between the pumping station and the water tower. Various means of funding
the project were discussed with the commission.
Ken Gervais spoke on behalf of constructing Sterling Street through to
provide for the new development in this area.
Commissioner Rossbach moved to recommend approval of the preliminary
plat as presented for feasibility report.
Commissioner Sletten seconded
Commissioner Cardinal moved to amend the motion to put a cap on the amount
of money and with a due date not to exceed one year.
Motion died for lack of a second
Voting on motion: - Ayes -- Commissioners Axdahl, Fiola,
Fischer, Hanson, Larson, Rossbach,
Sletten, Sigmundik, Whitcomb
Nayes -- Commissioner Cardinal
1 -2 -R7
1 d'
Action by Council.
MEMORANDUM Endorsedd
Modified
Re ected ...
Date
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Temporary Signs
DATE: March 26, 1987
SUMMARY
Requests
Council requested that staff review the ordinance. regulating banners
and streamers.
Staff Proposal
Banners and streamers are not specifically regulated, but fall under
the regulations for temporary signs. The ordinance limits them to 1160
days or until completion of project." -This wording causes enforcement
problems - how many 60 -day periods each year are allowed? What is
meant by completion of a project? Could a banner for a closeout sale
that. never closes go on forever? The staff recommendation for 40 days
each year for each business is consistent with the time limits
established for portable signs. A survey of. other cities is attached.
Please note that certain temporary signs, such as real estate,
political and portable signs, may not be covered 'by this ordinance
since they are specifically regulated in other sections of the sign
code.
Recommendation (At least 4 votes required)
Approval of the attached ordinance.
kd
Attachments
1. Ordinance
2. Survey
R.i,7'; .4N SYVp!fa :;n. p . y:; yF. r ;;F'TYiR'ct- : "4'' ,- .. ";t }'y.'7x
ORDINANCE NO .
AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE REGULATIONS
FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS
The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Section 3.6 -278 is amended as follows
additions are underlined and deletions are crossed
out) :
Sec. 36 -278. Temporary Signs
This section applies to all temporary_ signs, including
streamers, except where -- specifically re ulated under
sections 36 -279 and 36 -307.
a) - o- -t- empe- r- eEy --S- ft - -s IA- A temporary s i 2n o f
non-rigid material shall not exceed 100 square feet in
area. Temporary signs of rigid material shall not
exceed thirty -two (32) square feet in area or eight
8) feet in height. Temporary signs may remain in
place for a period not exceeding -9y-- {- - -s-
co-rr-un t i -1- -e6emp4 -e -ie --cif -' -a' a -. forty ( 4 0) day s
each year for each business.
A sign displayed for part of a day shall be
considered as having been up for an entire day for
purposes of administering this ordinance.
c) , No temporary sign sha l l be__pl aced on or over
public property or obstruct the visibility of drivers
at intersections.
d) The city council may approve exce2tions to this
section if unusual circumstances are documented by the
applicant.
b) T- he-- f-a - g-- a- re- 4- t_t- ec --t_c 'C7 - y- -i- s-V
pa -gam- s5 1W
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
y 1
Passed by the Maplewood City Council
this day of , 1987.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes--
Nays--
S U RVE_Y
7 -25 -86
HOW DO YOU REGULATE BANNERS?
Community
Maplewood
White Bear Lake
Oakdale
Newport
Shoreview
Little Canada
Golden Valley
Eagan
Columbia Heights
W. St. Paul
New Hope
Maple Grove
Apple Valley
Brooklyn Center
No. St. Paul
Fridley
Blaine
Woodbury
New Brighton
St. Paul
Code Provision
Not regulated
Prohibited
Ii
Permitted, but regulated
Grand opening only -7 days maximum
One per business per year -10 days
each
15 days per year
2 10 -day permits per year
3 times per year -10 days each time
3 nonconsecutive 10 -day permits
per year
30 days per year
30 days per year
Twice per year -30 days each -90
days in between
90 days per year
Coon Rapids
Cottage Grove
So. St. Paul
Vadnais Heights
Roseville
90 days per year Permits issued
in 15 or 30 day increments with
15 days in between,
3 per year -30 days each
90 days per year - special events
only
No limitations
Grand opening only - policy require-
ment (no code regulations)
V l .. .r
w .r , s .dLS .6G. 'W4. R i v - ...t .7G., .,r1t
6. All requirements of the fire marshal l shall be met to maintain proper
clearance from buried tanks and vent pipes.
7. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the following requirements of the
11 -8 -84 variance approval must be met:.
a. Striping of the parking spaces in front of the In "N" Out Market.
b. Posting a "no parking" sign, painting the curb ellow or any
other means acceptable to the city that would prohibit parking on,
the easterly side of the south half . of the building.
Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes- -all
E. Conditional Use Permit - -H and I Investments
Dave Carlson, contractor, was present representing the applicant. He
questioned Numbers 1 and ' 5 of the staff recommendation regarding the bike
path and the requirement for stop signs at the apartment complex exits.
The applicant agreed to stipe the bicycle /pedestrian trail but also stated
that he believed this land was a state right -of -way. The q uesti on was
raised by the board whether this trail would need state approval. The
applicant stated that conforming with conditions 3 and 4 of the staff
recommendation would cost him an additional $4,000 to $5,000. The
board discussed alternative materials to use on the garages.
Board Member Deans moved adoption of the resolution approving
a conditional use permit for the reconstruction of anon- conforming garage
structure at the Brookview Manor apartments. Approval is based on the
findings required by code, and also since: (1) the new structure would be
safer and more attractive than the existing structure; and (2) since
the new structure would be built entirely on the applicant's property.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Stop signs shall be provided at the apartment complex exits to
Brookview Drive and Century Avenue.
2. All bituminous drives and parking areas shall be patched as code
requires.
3. The exterior walls shall be decorative concrete block except at
the south side, which can be lap siding,
Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes--all
F. Code Amen dment-- Temporar Snsg
The board discussed the ordinance and specific examples of signs in the
community,
Board Member Marlow moved approval of the sign code amendment regulating
banners.
4
2 -24 -87
9 `
Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes ---all
VII... VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
IX. STAFF.PRESENTATIONS
X. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 9:18 p.m.
5 2-24-87
MEMORANDUM Ac U-on by Council
E1amd1Fi!
Acting Cityty Mana er
Modli f TO: g
FROM: Acting City Engineer ..-..
SUBJECT: Upper Afton Road -- McKnight to Century Date
City Project 86 -07 -- Public Hearing
DATE: April 20, 1987
A public hearing has been called for April 27, 1987 at 7:20 p.m. for
the reconstruction of Upper Afton Road. All affected property owners
have been notified of this hearing, and an informational session was
held on April 23, from 3 to 6 p.m. at the East County Line No. 1 Fire
Station at Maryland and Century.
Attached is the feasibility report for the reconstruction of Upper
Afton Road from McKnight Road to Century Avenue prepared by the city's
consultant. The consultant has determined a design of a state -aid
design standard street 44 feet in width (2 driving, 2 parking /turn
lanes) with a storm sewer system conveying water to designated
outlets. Minor water main and sanitary sewer adjustments are
proposed, but no new service is being provided. The total project
cost is estimated to be $1,309,000. This cost includes loo for
contingencies and 28% for indirect expenditures.
The following f i nanc i ng proposals considers assessing benefited
properties with frontage on the roadway and with drainage to the
proposed storm sewer. City policy on state -aid streets is to assess
the frontage at $35.00 per front foot with the remaining cost paidfromthestate -aid account. Storm sewer costs are estimated to be 750
eligible for state -aid reimbursement with the remaining storm sewer
costs assessed against benefited parcels.
Ramsey County Parks Department has requested the construction of a
pedestrian /vehicle underpass as part of this project. The entire cost
of this underpass is to be paid by Ramsey County, Approximately 65%
of the frontage along this segment is Ramsey County open space.
Assessment of Ramsey County by Maplewood can only be accomplished bypermissionofRamseyCounty. It is proposed that Ramsey County be
assessed the cost of the underpass and the Battle Creek Regional Rark
frontage from McKnight to Afton Heights Park (leased by Maplewood) as
a package. This represents an assessment of 1,500 front feet at
35.00 per front foot or $52 plus the underpass at $85,650.00
for a total of $138,150.00. Negotiations with Ramsey County would
begin immediately upon project ordering by the council. Maplewood's
portion of the project cost is proposed to be paid with state -aid
monies. The city's state -aid allocation is currently over
2,000,000. which is approaching the maximum allowed w i th no
further allocations until funds are expended,
SUMMARY OF FINANCING
Totals $170,310 $138,150 $1,000,540 $1,309,000
It is recommended that the council hold the public hearin and order
P reparation of plans and specifications b passin the attached resolution*
This is a council - initiated project and re four (4) votes for
ordering*
Asmt Asmt Cost Ramse Mplwd Project
Description Units Rate Recover Count Portion Cost
Street 3 FF 35*00/FF 108,080 52 $843, 100 11003y680
Underpass 0 EA 0e00/EA 0 85,650 0 85,650
Storm Sewer
RL 249,726 SF 05/SF 12 0 145,900 20 8
SC & S 497,438 SF 10ISF 49,740
Water Main 0 FF 0900/FF 0 0 7 7,040
Sanitar
Sewer 0 FF 0.00/FF 0 0 4,500 4
Totals $170,310 $138,150 $1,000,540 $1,309,000
It is recommended that the council hold the public hearin and order
P reparation of plans and specifications b passin the attached resolution*
This is a council - initiated project and re four (4) votes for
ordering*
12 .oo
Z
Q
2 'i
Ir 2 a
UPPER A F TON RD ' ""! ". u '"""'
low
NA
GENERAL ASSESSMENT AREA
PROJECT 86 -07 ece
UPPER AFTON ROAD IMP. NSA
Tonners
Coke
12
94
N
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearin on the reconstruction
of the street and storm draina s on Upper Afton Road from
McKni Road to Centur Avenue, Cit Project 86-07, a hearin on said
improvement in accordance with the notice dul given was dul held on
April 27, 1987, and the council has heard all persons desirin to be
heard on the matter and has full considered the same
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
10 That it is advisable, expedient, and necessar that the Cit
of Maplewood reconstruct the street and storm draina s on Upper
Afton Road from McKni Road to Centur Avenue, Cit Project 86-07 as
described in the notice of hearin thereon, and orders the same to be
made,
2* The cit en is desi en for this
improvement and is hereb directed to prepare final plans and
specifications for the makin of said improvement.
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
r
1987 MUNICIPAL STATE 1D SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
rv UPPER AFTON ROAD
FROM McKNIGHT ROAD TO CENTURY AVENUE
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
L
COMM.NO. 8839
MARCH 27, 1987
TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
1 AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292 -4400
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSONTKDA. AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
k' SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ,5510155101
612/292 -4400
March 27, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Maplewood
1E30 East County Road 6
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: 1987 - Muni c i pa I State Aid Improvements
Maplewood, M.i n nesota
Commission No. 8839
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Enclosed herewith is our f e a s i b i l i t y report for the proposed Improvement
project which has been prepared at your request. The report details the
engineering f e a s i b i l i t y , associated costs and financing . for this project,
Our studies Indicate that Upper Afton Road between McKnight Road and
CenturyCery Avenue i s i n need of improvement, and that the improvements
proposed In this report are feasible. The total estimated project cost Is
1,304,500 with an estimated $1,069,950 to be MSAS cost e l i g i b l e , The
remaining X234, 550 w i I l be financed by a combination of assessments and
County participation.
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance and comments b our CityYYY
Engineer, and other staff members In preparation of this report.
We w i l i be av a i l a b l e to discuss the report with you on April 13, 19879
Si ncerei y yours,
Larry D. Rohrer, P.E.
LDB:adh
TCLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCH I TECTS - PLANNERS MARCH 27, 1987
FEAS I B I L .l.1Y_.. P.
1.987 MU N I C I PAL STALE I D SYSTEM, _I MMO-V EEMEN, TS
UPPER AFTON ROAD
FROM MCKN I GHT ROAD ,?.Q.S ATV RY AVENUE
MAPL EW.,_._OD,,MINNESOTA
DOMMISSION NO, 8839
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a du I y registered Professional Eng i neer under the
I aws. of the State of Minnesota.
Larry D. hrer, P.E.
Registration No. 12120
3
4
5
5
6
7
7
8
8.
9
9
9
9
10
I
Existing Conditions
t
s
Proposed Improvements
1. Street Reconstruction and Widening
2. Sidewalks
3 Pedestr i an /Ve h i c le Underpass
t 40 Storm Sewer
5. Watermai n
f
s 69 Boulevard Trees
Estimated Costs
Project Cost Summary
j Feasibility
f
Right-of-Way and Easements
t:
Approvals
Pro Initiation
Proposed Pro Schedule
t
e ,
F igure No. 1
Figure No. 2
Appendix
P r e l i m i n a r y Cost Estimates
is Preliminary Pavement Design
Letter from City of Woodbury
t;
C
is
Ii
ii
3
4
5
5
6
7
7
8
8.
9
9
9
9
10
I
Upper Afton Road is located In southern Maplewood, about one -half mile south
of l - 94. It Is bounded by McKnight Road ( CSAH 68) on the west and by
Century Avenue ( TH 120) on the east. The western h a l f of the project area
Js park and open space. The eastern half of the project area Is a mixture
of residential development on the north and open space on the south. The
eastern 400 feet at Century Avenue Is commercial In nature with two gas
stations, a clinic, office space, and Carver Elementary School.
The street was last surfaced In about 1962. The r i deab i I ity Is poor,
e s p e c i a l l y -on the eastern h - a l f , which has had numerous patches over the
years. This indicates the pavement strength Is i nsuf f i.c i ent for present
traffic, which Is estimated at 5,,100 vehicles per, day . Traffic on this road
Is expected to increase at an average annual rate of 3.5 %, or a doubling of
the present traf f i c i n 20 years. Th is street i s a i so a route for MTC and
school buses which required special pavement strength,
Drainage is also inadequate, especi a1 I y on the eastern half of the road, In
which the drainage runs along the edge of the roadway or In sha l low ditches,
Poor drainage Is one of the reasons the road has required frequent patching..
There are no sidewalks or pedestrian crosswalks. The entire elementary age
population from the residential area north of Upper Afton Road walks to
Carver Elementary School and crosses Upper Afton Road. Use of the Ramsey
County Regional. Park will increase. No provisions exist to guide
pedestrians or vehicles from the park on the north side of Upper Afton Road
to.the open space on the south side of the road.
Sanitary sewers and waterma i ns In the street are determined to be adequate
for the future. The easterly 400 feet of Upper Afton Road contains a City
of Woodbury waterma i n. wh i ch - was extended to Ca rver E I ementary Schoo I i n
1 957 , prior to water being a v a i l a b l e from Maplewood. The commercial
development between the school and Century Avenue has connected to t h i s
waterma i n over the years.
3- 8839
Pgposed I mprov_ements
J
The proposed improvements w i I l be designed and constructed In accordance
with MSAS standards and consist of street reconstruction and widening, storm
sewer drainage improvements, s i d e w a l k construction, pedestrian /vehicular
underpass at the Regional Park, optional beaut i f i cati on of boulevards and
slopes with trees and plantings,, and the incorporation of that portion of
the City of Woodbury water system In the street into the City of Maplewood
water system. The improvements are s pe c i f i c a l l y described as f o l l o w s :
10 street Reconstruction and Widening
It is recommended that the street be reconstructed to an. urban design
width of 44 feet with concrete curb and gutter. The typical section of
th Is street is shown In Figure No. 1 . This width wi I i al low for two
through lanes and two paral lei parking lanes. However, park i ng ' shou 1 d
be proh i b i ted f rom the easter I y 400 feet between Mayh i I I Road and
Century Avenue to accommodate the special needs of the Century Avenue
Intersection, At this intersection, Upper Afton Road would consist of
three driving lanes; an eastbound right turn lane onto southbound
Century Avenue, an eastbound middle lane for through traffic. into
Woodbury or left turn onto northbound Century Avenue, and a westbound
i ane. MnDOT Is p l ann i ng to construct turn Ianes and instal I traff is
signals on Century Avenue and Upper Afton Road intersection in 1988.
Ramsey County has no improvements planned for McKnight Road in the near
future.
A portion of the Countyts property which the City leases for Afton
Heights Park and its adjacent parking lot are much higher than the
street, W l den i ng of the street w i l l requ i re that a concrete reta i n i ng
w a l l be built on the right -of -way l i n e from the ba I If i e I d driveway to
the west en.d of the b a l i f fi e l d parking area. This w a l l w i l l be
approximately 420 feet long and have a maximum height of 7 feet. The
top of the w a l l w i I I be fitted with a chain link fence to prevent
ch i I dren from sitti ng or pi ay i ng on the wa I I . The s I ope beh i nd the
wall w i l l slope up to the b.a l i f ieI d park i ng area at a rate of 1 foot
vertical for every 2 feet horizontal (20). Opti ona I plantings, such
as Sumac, could be planted on this slope for beautification.
Concrete dr i veway aprons w i I I be constructed to each dr i veway .
Residential driveways are limited to 24 feet wide and commercial
driveways are limited to 32 feet wide, This Is important at Atmos
Travel and U n i on 76 station where presently access Is not defined and
customers frequently drive across the paved boulevard.
The existing bituminous surface and aggregate base w i i I be salvaged and
replaced to the greatest extent possible.
Disturbed turf In lawns or where erosion Is a concern will be restored
by sodding. A l l other areas w i l l be seeded and mulched.
Design speed of the reconstructed road would be 40 mph.
A l I construction costs for street reconstruction and w i den i ng are
anticipated to be e l i g i b l e for State Aid reimbursement.
4- 8839
20 Salo
F i.ve ( 5 ) foot wide concrete s i d e w a l k s are recommended at certain
locations along Upper Afton Road to guide elementary age school-
children to Carver Elementary School, The locations are shown on
Figure No. 2 and described as f o l l o w s :
a. North -SI de
Sidewalks should be constructed on the north side of Upper Afton
Road between the bal If 1e I.d driveway and Mayh i I I Road. Designated
school crosswalks are at Farrel I Street and Mayh 11 I Road.
b. mouth S de
S i d e w a l k s should be constructed on the south side of Upper Afton
Road between Farrel I Street and Century Avenue,
AI I construction costs for s dewaI ks are anticipated to be e i 9 I le for
State Aid reimbursement.
3. Pedestr I an/Veh i. I g, Underpass
Ramsey County Parks and Open Space requested that an underpass be
considered which would allow pedestrians and maintenance vehicles 'to
cross Upper Afton Road without interfering with traffic. A 9-foot high
by 12-foot w.1 de precast concrete box culvert be the minimum size
required to pass the County maintenance vehicles. Upper Afton Road 1s
suf f i c ent I y e l evated above the ad j a c e n t groan d at a p i n
approximately 200 feet east of the existing park entrance to allow th i s
underpass construction.
This underpass would require that the existing waterma i n located on the
south s i de of Upper Afton Road be of fret to the south so that i t w i I I
remain ac ce s s i b l e for maintenance.
The south end of the underpass w i I I be adjacent to a small wet I and . A
storm sewer In I et w i I i be constructed adjacent to the wetl and to
control the high water level.
I t I s ant i c i pated that Ramsey County Parks and Open Space w i I I pay the
entire cost of the Pedestrian/Vehicle Underpass and related work.
5 - 8 gi 9
I
40 -StorM Sewer
This portion of Upper Afton Road Is tributar to the Battle. Creek
watershed.. The -Upper Afton. Road draina area is divided Into four
areas and will be served b storm sewers as shown i n Fi No. 2. The
storm sewers and .inlet spacin have been desi for a 10- return
storm -interval, which desi the avera period of years In which a
storm .of a certain ma Js expected to occur once*. For storms of
greater Intensit emer overf low paths are desi to avoid
dama b floodin The Individual storm sewers and draina areas are
described as follows,
a. Cantu ry' Aven
Dral na area I s that porti on of Up pe r Afton Road f rom Ma h I I I
Road to Centur Avenuel, Catch basins w I I be constructed in the
low point In front of the 01 Vnic buildin Storm water w I I be
conve to Centur Avenue In 21-Inch RC The existin storm
sewer In Centur Avenue is Inade consistin of shal low 18-
Inch corru metal culverts which have been extended and
connected over the years. MnDOT Is plannin to replace these
pipes with their widenin pro in 1988. The Cit pro will
re that about 140 feet of 21-Inch RCP be constructed north
alon the west side of Centur Aven to an existin catch basin
for a temporar connection Into the Centur Avenue S This
con nect I on w I I I be rev I sed b MnDOT In 19889
bo E ag t Ce n tra I
Draina area Is that portion of Upper Afton Road from O'Da
Street to Ma hI I I Road. Catch basins w I I be constructed at the
low pot nt between Dennis Lane and Farrel I Street, at Ferndale
Street, Dennis Lane a.nd at the Carver School drivewa This
storm sewer wl I I consist of 1 8 -inch, 21-Inch and 27-Inch RCP and
will dischar southerl onto the Count open space propert
C* West Qeatral
Draina area Is that portion of Upper Afton Road from west of
0t Da Street to the proposed pedestrian underpass. Catch basins
will be constructed at the ballfield entrance and at the west end
of the proposed- retainin wal I This storm sewer w I I consist of
12-1 nch and 1 8-Inch RCP and wi I I di schar souther I y to an
existin pond In the Count open space propert In accordance
with the Cit Draina Plan.
do McKntabt Bud
Draina area Is that portion of Upper Afton Road f rom the
proposed pedestrian underpass to McKnI Road. A storm sewer
In I et wt I I be constructed at the south. end of the underpass and
catch bast ns w I I I be constructed alon the street at
approximatel 500-foot Intervals. This storm sewer w I I consist
of 12-Inch and 18-Inch RCP and connect Into the existin 42--inch
RCP at McKni Road.
883 9
It Is estimated that 75% of the storm sewer construction costs are
e l i g i b l e for State Aid reimbursement,
50 WateMa i n
The City of Woodbury is wi I I i ng to relinquish ownership of the 500±
f eet of . 6- i nch C 1 P waterma i n i ocated i n Upper A f ton Road between
Mayh i I I .Road and Century Avenue. It Is recommended that the City of
Map 1 ewood accept th Is waterma i n, 'connect. It to the. Map l ewood system at
Mayh i I I Road and disconnect it from the Woodbury system at Century
Avenue I n th Is, way, the City of Map I ewood w i I I. have contro I over a I I
of the waterma i n f a c i l i t i e s within its right-of-way.
It Is anticipated that the entire cost of th i s waterma i n work w i l l be
paid from the Hydrant Fund.
6 Boulevard Tres (Optional)
Boulevard trees can be planted for beautification of the project and
Are e I i g i b I e. for _State Aid reimbursement. Many disease resistant
species are a v a i l a b l e such as Maple, Locust, Linden, Hackberry,
Ironwood, a d Ash. Generally, boulevard trees could be planted
wherever there Is not a con f I i ct with i n p lace ut i I i t i es .. For the
purpose of this report, it was ' esti mated that up to 50 boulevard trees
could be planted.
7- 8839
Imated Costs
The esti mated costs i n the f I I ow i ng cost summary i ncI ude 10$ for
contingencies and 28% for engineering, administrative., legal and other
Indirect costs. Municipal State Aid funding on indirect cost, is I imited to
18% for engineering, therefore the remaining 10% for administrative, legal
and other indirect cost Is shown as a "local" cost. Detailed estimates of
construction costs are Included i n the appendix.
Protect Colt Summary
Dggcr1pt_lon
Total
Cost
MSA
El foible
Countyty
Share
CI t y
Sh-are
1. Construction Cost
with Contingencies
Street Reconstruction 596, 900 596,900 0
Retaining W a l l 142,400 142p400 0
S i d e w a l k 23., 200 23, 2 00 0
Underpass 66 0 66, 900 0
Trees (Optional 13, 800 13 0
Storm Sewer 162,600 121, 950(75 %)40, 650
Wate rm a i n S_ 5.5 00 0 S 5
Subtotal 1, 011, 300 898, 250 66, 900 46,150
2. Indirect Costs (28%)2 8, 200 161,700 (18%)14 750 102, 750
3. Easements 1 QQ,Q 1%0 00 S 0 0
TOTALS 1,304,500 1,069,950 850650
1
148900
2
This cost to Ramsey County is for the Pedestrian /Vehicle Underpass. There
may be other costs to Ramsey County for the special benefits received from
the other improvements.
2City share to be paid by special assessments against benefitted property.
8- 8 83 9
Feasibiitty
The project i s f e a s i b l e from a construction standpoint, and should best be
made as proposed. The economic feasibi11ty must be determined by the City
Council and the property owners Involved.
Rght- f -Way and Easem mss,
A 66 -foot wide right-of-way exists and Is sufficient for the permanent
improvements. Permanent easements w i I 1 be required for two storm sewer
outlets on County property. Temporary slope and construction easements w i 1 1
be req u i red a I ong the enti re project to properl y match exi sti ng yards and
property, It is anticipated that the easements w i 1 I be obtained at no cost,
however, for the purpose. of this report, an al iowance of $10,004 has been
included for easement acquisition The cost of easements Is State Aid
eligible.
App r.gya.l s
The following plan approvals are required.
1. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) - State Aid Division
2 St. Paul Water Utility
3. Ramsey County Highway Department for connection at McKnight Road
40 Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District
A . permit to connect to storm sewer In Century Avenue w i l I be required from
the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Protect initiation
This protect was initiated by the City and a 4/5 majority vote of the
Council is required to order this protect.
9- 8ffi9
PROPOSED
i.
EROJ ECT SCHEDUI F
Counc i I Rece i ves Feas i b i I i ty Report and
Schedules Pub l i c Hearing Apri 1 13, 1987
2.Pub I i c I nformati on Meeti ng Apr 11 23, 1987
Public Hearing April 27, 1987.
4.Council Orders Plans and Spec i f.i cati ons or
Abandons Project April 27, 1987-
59 Council Approves Plans and Specifications and
Orders Bids; Plans Submitted to MnDOT for Review June 8, 1987
6.Ad for Bids Pub I i shed In Legal Newspaper June 10, 1987
7.Ad for Bids Published In Construction Bulletin June 12, 1987
8..Bids Received July 7, 1987
99 Council Considers Bids and Awards Contract July 13, 1987
109 Assessment Hearing August 24, 1987
11.Substantial Project Completion November .15, 1987
12.F i n a l Bituminous Wearing Course and
Project Completion June 1, 1988
10- 8E5 9
IrL -
J I A .
L. V`.V MVV• VMJL
r ,
BIT. WEARING COURSE MnDOT 2361 (3/4
TACK COAT
BIT. BINDER COURSE MnDOT 23310-1/2"
TACK COAT
BIT. BASE COURSE MnDOT 2331
TYPICAL SECTION
UPPER AFTON ROAD
FIGURE N0.1
fi .
D
U)
tT1
n
0
c
Z
0
rn
z
D
n
rn
C
0
m
D
O
Z
O
D
v
1
0
Z
nD
00
QD
G)
U)
v
m
D
r
STERLING ST.
I
O'DAY ST.
I
McCLELLAND ST.
I
FERNDALE ST.
DENNIS LN.
1
I
I 0
nano anowamu
400M mummm
D
rn
c
0.
c
z
0
rn
z
D
n
rn
C
m
D
O
Z
O
D
v
McKNIGHT RD.
1
i
l .O
i
O
Z
C
rn
Z
O
O
Z
O
D
D
m
1
1
1
111
1
1 1
1
rn
G)
DENNIS LN.
i,
FARRELL ST.
jo
IJ
r MAYHILL RD
CENTURY AVE
O
Z
O
D
D
m
1
1
1
111
1
11
1
rn
G)
PREL
1987
I M I N ARY CO ST E ST I MAC
MSA Improvements -.Upper Afton Road
Map I ewood, M i n nesota
Commission No. 8859
V STREET RECON S'i`RU CT, ON, AND I. DEN_I NGW
Item Unit
No.Description Quan±lty Price
1 Clear and Grub Trees 30090 EA 100900 30, 000.00
2 Remove Bituminous Pavement 21, 00.0 00 SY 1.00 21, 000.00
3 Remove Concrete Pavement 2650 SY 5.00 1,325.00
4 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter 100.0 LF 3.00 300.00
5 Remove Existing CW 190.0 LF 2.00 380.00
z -; 6 Remove Existing RCP 50.0 LF 3.00 150.00
7 Common Excavation 15, 250.0 CY 3.50 53, 375.00
8 Granular Borrow (CV)6, 200.0-CY 8.00 49 600.00
9
10
C I as s 5 Gravel
Bituminous Base Co 2 33 1
2%600.0
3, 63 Q 0
TN
TN
6.00
11.0
126,000900
ur se 0 3 9, 93 0.0 Q
11 Bituminous Binder Course 2331 2 TN 11.00 24, 200.00
12 Bituminous Wear Course 2331 260.0 TN 14.00 3, 640.00
13 Bituminous Wear Course 2361 1,100.0 TN 20.00 22, 000.00
14 AC Material for Mix 41090 TN 165.00 67,650900
15 Tack Coat 2, 400.0 GA 1.00 2, 400.00
16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 10, 650.0 LF 5.00 53, 250.00
17 Concrete Driveway Apron 6"475.0 SY 24900 11, 400.00
18 Adjust Existing valve Box 13.0 EA 150.00 1, 950.00
19 Adjust Existing Casting 22.0 EA 300.00 6, 600.00
20 Topsoil Borrow 450.0 CY 10.00 4,500.00
k .21 Sodding 4,SY 2.50 1010 000.00
22 Seeding 4.5 AC 2,000900 9,000.00
Remove s
Subtotal 542, 650.00
10% Contingencies 54
Estimated Construction Cost 596 900.00
PREL 1
1987
i RY COST EST ! MATE
MSA Improvements - Upper Afton Road
Maplewood, Mi. n nesota
Commission No. 8E59
RE T =
item
No.
NING WALL CON ST U CT i_ ON_
De.sr,-r 112-tl.Qn Quantl
Unit
Amo
1 Concrete Mix 1A43 235.0 CY 190.00 44 50.00
2 Concrete Mi x 3Y43 235.0 CY 225.00 52, 875.00
3 Reinforcement 2 8, 500.0 LB 0.50 14, 250.00
10,560.004StructuralExcavation1,760.0 CY 6.00
5 Fence 416.0 LF 10100 4,160.00
lMoO EA I-3&Q 0Plan±inas
Subtotal 1290495.00
10 % Contingencies 12.905.00
Estimated Construction Cost 142,400900
S_I,QEWALK CON STRUCT I ON
tem Unit .
Nos s
e
Subtota 21,060900
10% Conti n 9 enc i'es
Estimated Construction Cost 23, 200.00
883 9
PREL-I.i! I NA-kY COST E ST i MATE
1987 MSA Improvements - Upper Afton Road
Map I ewood, Minnesota
Commission.No. 8859
PEDESTRIAN /VEHICLE UNDERPASS
Item
No. Deggr.-Ijaflon
Unit
Quantity Pzlre Amunt,
1 9 x 12 Precast Box Culvert 84.0 LF $ 450.00 37, 800.0:0
2 Precast End Section 290 EA $ 8 000.00 16, 000.00
3 Granular Bedding 37590 CY $ 8.00 3, 000.00.
4 I Watermaln Relocat.I.Qn.1,aO LS I-AOQOOaOQ S*42QOOoOD
Subtotal 60, 800.00
10% Contingencies A 100-000
Estimated. Construction Cost 66, 900.00
BOULEVARD TREES (Optiona
Item Unit
No. Ducr-lPtIon Quantit Pr-1- cp. &g u n t
u Jrges UsO EA 1 250000 S 12000&0
Subtotal $ 12, 500.00
10% Contingencies $ 1
Estimated Construction Cost $ 13, 800.00
PREL J M I.N : RY QO ST E ST I MATE
1987 MSA Improvements - Upper Afton Road
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 8ffi 9
STO
Item
No.Deacr. I -pt I on QUantity..
Unit
ft-192--
1 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer 390 EA 300.00 900.00
2 12" RCP CI ass 5 2,035.0 LF 27.00 54, 945:00
3 15" RCP CI ass 5 340.0 LF 30.00 10,200900
4 16 RCP CI ass 5 77090 LF 33.00 25, 410. 0
5 21" RCP Class 5 665.0 LF 36.0.0 23, 940.00
6 24" RCP Class 3 50.0 LF 40.00 2, 000.00
7 2711 RCP Class 3 3090 LF 42.00 1,260900
8 30" RCP Class 3 1590 LF 45.00 675.00
9 Manhole 0 -8' Depth 5.0 EA 1,000900 5,OOO9OO
1.0 Shal low Catch Basin 12.0 EA 900.00 10, 8Q
11 Standard Catch Basin 11.0 EA 950.00 10, 450.00
12 15" .Apron 290 EA 300900 600.00
13 27 Apron w /Trash Guard 1.0 EA 600.00 600.00
14 30 Apron w /Trash Guard 1.0 EA 750.00 750.00
15 Typ e A - R - fp R 6aQ CY 50-* 0 0 3
Subtotal 147, 80900
10% Contingencies 14.7700O
Estimated Construction Cost 162
s •lr
PREL 1 WARY COST EST I MATE
1987 MSA Improvements - Upper Afton Road
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 8ffi 4
WATERMAIN - Connection and Disconnection
Item Unit
1 Disconnect at Century Avenue 1.0 LS $2, 500.00 2,5001000
2 Connect i on at May h i I I Road 1.0 LS $2, 000.00 2, 000.00
3 Fittings 175.0 LB $ 1.60 2-8D * 0 0
n R-1 P.-JOsO LF 1 2200 S 220*90
Subtotal 5, 000.00
10% Contingencies 500.00
Estimated Construction Cost 5, 500.00
TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292 -4400
Project Comm No Sheet of
Computations for' -'' B y Date
Chkd Date
TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS- 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
r 612/292 -4400
Projects Comm N S ofNoeet
Computations for ' By Date
Chkd Date
DA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
612/292 -4400
Project Comm No hS eet of
Computations for - Se . 6y Date
Chkd Date
Arrual 9rowI Cackor 3.5% => 20
zsErk dul Nla = IOU.coB
18) 20 2.8) 10392400
rvam -51E 7 -5.D3J
23co1 \(earnq Course 3 /41
2331 3,noy Corse - -Z
4.1
G , = 2. = all 2331 a
cm. 5 = g y : CLA55
OR Class
3/4 2.3 Cp I W r-5 Co v-.
Z _II Z B Co
1 Z CI ass 5 Ac3cre.ae_
u
i CD I C)'a
a a s rlaaar!liililr /rAafar! raiiiia !=itiat! aiillialrtratar aleiflst!C C C
0 C
i!lalalAlirai!!laal!!ir!!!a!a!!! aiia! !laai al!!!a!!! ®ia !!!!!!!!a!!!!!!aa!!1!!!!!!!MEN
Ron cc C cn r
QD
U; 19 Not
t , 1 fj rl r
aa L ii'/iw wi' /otiitai7silatJia /!>I
MOM :raaaat,aralaa.l'i aAilE/aa//!liaa //
a !!!!
1 /!aiia /Ii!// a / /!!`'i !!!!/ /!!i/
iii o ii es es r r es Sri ii i pis r,t i aiailk7 /aiaa' eti7' / ?Jir' /!ate! ar /!! /!!/iMo :=l yir aiirfl aflfririatftltrar il!
6 . !=fit! ®!,'J'ii iCi.! ! %!! /llii ®I! / /!
t!@Sol; '
0
PAorst •. wwir •.. i .i - .ec: -.w wriw. siwaiialiiaii laa!` SA VA=== l. raw ia!l! liili aa!'AMa1w!!!! /! a aA'!.wAIA rll A'I„ OA'./!! A:!!!!! /I!!riii:eiiWiiYYiirYiili:iiiiir iiliiYiir'i i ilra Itr A`lia / /'
ra!!!a!ar a!!s llmmsa! ire wow UNIMI v NIEWWW WWWOww• •e:sw MPFA wt MwrILPiM twwww wwtt
a!!!!!! wow wllrMMIKOWWWAME wowalis!!!!r!aaora!!!r
OVA
aiia!! !!! a /!/ice!! /I !!/ ll.f!!!! /aiia!!a!!lll,i''!! /. / / /. /!!!!!: %!talimonologIssal
PAP
1111
111111IN1111121 ./,, - a- >_
ltiitiata! uli! iritt i !! ®a wwsrslaa wwi'ata!!a !!!s! !! l; lal aliris ! ail ! !a!!ilif =a .• !!'A! aiia!!N Aa! man w aav! 1 w !%w Y!!I!! !!aiiaMEN as mom OWE I M UNW U!a!! aiiawec sswn+n ® .mow ow r Sri wwwr w! r!! rwilwwN4alc :i !i! near! !li! r. laat taa! ! !ialallaaalE3Dam4! !alai l1aa11!!laaa aiia!!U lam lIM! son 01101M I NN !!E t !a R!! !aria!W !A a mom NOME 1 WE !M UNI1! aiiaIMINEINIEWNOWmomMMEMNIMENIMInNIINK
nH
e, a e ••
a a!m
a!!! !!a Sam !! a !!A! 1 ! !! Ai iii !aiia!a! a !!! m m !t ! 11 /! 011MIF111MINIMMIaiia! MEN mom mom aNI NIM I M IMER 11!11 MEMOii"' w w. w>.......... .....o... ...... w.wi w.....aiia! !!! ir '.1l.aiial!!!lieiaiiii !aiia!
MINIM!!!!!! mom
ta1!la! aluardmra a1aialri!! 11
1100§01 moo
eee
ee
i -W6 `-'' P BLIC WORKS
R24
s
Mr Larry B. Bohrer, P.E.
To.Itz, King, Duvall, Anderson Q;w of
and Associates, Incorporated 0W"Lm
2500 Aiierican National Bank Building
R
0 - firJUAGSt. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Vwffz 0 Mtic
Re Uppe Afton Road Imo rovement
Maplewood, Minnesota
Termination of U"ater Main
Alm r-cu
Dear i Bohrer: ACCO 0ifs ;
I an writing in response to your February letter and our
earlier conversatin regarding the existing Woodbury water mainwhich
serves an area in 1aplewood near Century Avenue and Up er Afton Road.
wee discussed the A-e Ca. . is agreeable to the termination of the
existing water main at Century Avenue. We propose to turn over the
se9 ent of water main in 1aplewood to the City. of Maplewood for their
operation and maintenaizce. The City of Maplewood should h .sicallpY Yterminatethewater :: ain at Century Avenue and plug both the Woodburystub -end an; i :iapiet,iO0 stub -end to insure that the two eater systems .
are not inter - connecter: and that neither system is contaminated byground- water infiltration.
I have enclose G . ist of the nine estab? ishments in MaplewoodWhicharecurrentlyservedbythiswatermainfromWoodbury, In each
case these establishmentSL have purchased water meters frog, the City, I
would suggest teat you . contact each of these establishments and notifythe:: of the pendin , Cnange in water service. You also may want to
ins;pec t the grater meters to insure that they are compatible with those
used b 1 the Cite of Maplewood. At the . time the water main is termi-
nate J, we wiesh to be notified so that we can slake a final readin g of
the water meters for billing purposes.
Please keep sae informed regarding the termination of the water
main from Woodbury. Call me if you have an further questions .Y
Sincerely,
David R essu
City En neer
DRJ /lf
enclosure
ec: James V. Lacina
Howard Radle
Tora V r ight
MAPLEWOOD WATER UTILITY ACCOUNTS
Account Number Account
1 -1424 Carver School
3 -242b Century Mall
3 -2430 Superamerica
3-2435 Afton Road Clinic
3 -2440 Atmos Travel
3-2450 Tom Thumb
3-2465.Big A Auto Parts
3 -2
3 -2445
R & J Investments
Century Avenue Service
Ar:
Action b
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Associate Planner --- Johnson
SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development, Revised
Plat, and Rezoning (F to R -1)
LOCATION: Century and Ivy-Avenues
APPLICANT /OWNER: Ed Cave and Sons, Inc.
PROJECT: Cave's Century Fifth Addition
DATE: March 27, 1987
REQUEST
Endorsed
Mods f ed
ej eete
Date
Preliminary
10 Revise the conditional use permit for the Cave's Century planned
unit development.
29 Revise the Cave's Century Fifth Addition preliminary plat to
substitute 20 double - dwelling units for 32 town -house units. (Refer
to the site plan on page 10 and the letter on page 11.)
3. Rezone the site from F, farm residence, to R -1, single family
staff proposal),
ISSUES RAISED BY NEIGHBORS
The owners of the 48 properties located within 350 feet of this
property were asked their opinion of this proposal. Each mobile home
owner within 350 feet was included in this survey. Of the ten
responses received, five were in favor, two had no comment, and three
were opposed.
Those in favor had the following comments:
10 Needs better landscaping and drainage. Staff reply: The site
plan, drainage and landscape plan must be approved by the Community
Design Review Board (CDRB) before a building permit will be issued.
Affected property owners will be invited to attend the CDRB meeting.
2. Where is the park they told us about when we bought our home?
Staff reply: The city has never proposed a park for this site. The
Geranium Avenue Park was recently acquired on Geranium Avenue, west of
Ferndale Street.
Those opposed to the proposal raised the following concerns:
1. It will create too much traffic. The area is already over
populated. Staff reply: This proposal would reduce future traffic by
decreasing the number of planned units from 32 to 20. The overall
density of the PUD is within the limi of the comprehensive plan.
Ivy Avenue is designated as a minor collector street to handle more
traffic than the average residential street.
2. We need a convenience store in the immediate neighborhood. Staff
reply: In May, 1986, the applicant withdrew a proposal that included a
convenience store because of neighborhood opposition and a planning
commisssion denial. (See the past action section.)
STAFF SUMMARY
This proposal would. reduce the number of units approved for this site
and provide a style of housing more consistent with adjacent single
and double dwellings. All city codes -and policies would be met.
The. rezoning from F to R -1 would eliminate any farm- related uses that
could be a nuisance for nearby residential uses.
RECOMMENDATION
I. Approve the resolution on page 12 to revise the northeast corner
of the Cave's Century planned unit development (PUD) to
substitute 20 double - dwelling units for 32 town -house units
plans stamped 2 -6 -87) on the basis of the ten standard findings
for approval.
Approval is subject to the following conditions (obsolete
language is crossed out and new language is underlined) :
1. Footings for the double - dwelling structures shall be pinned
by a registered surveyor to insure that the party walls are
constructed on the common lot lines.
2. Deed restrictions shall be recorded against the title of
each lot or a home owners' association agreement shall be
recorded concurrently w th the Cave's Century Fifth Addition plat
to include, but not be limited to, the following requirements
required by Section 30 -16 b of code) :
a. Each double - dwelling structure shall have a uniform
exterior appearance in terms of color, design and
maintenance
b. If one unit is burned or destroyed, it shall be
reconstructed in a uniform appearance, and if both units are
burned or destroyed, minimum lot widths hall then prevail
for a single -dwell i home, double dwelling ma be
rebuilt meeting the original conditions of this section.
c. Any disputes shall be submitted to binding arbitration
according to the rules of the Minnesota Arbitration
Association
II. Approval of the revised preliminary plat for Cave's Century Fifth
Addition (plans stamped 2 -6 -87) , subject to the following
conditions being met prior to final plat approval:
1. Final approval of drainage, utility and grading plans by the
city engineer.
2. Submittal of a developer's agreement, with required surety,
for the required public improvements.
2
u
u
III.Adopt the enclosed resolution (page 15 ) , rezoning the entire site
from F, farm residence, to R -1, single dwelling. (At least four
votes in favor are necessary for approval.)
This rezoning is proposed to eliminate the possibility of any
future nuisance complaints associated with the uses permitted in
a farm zone, such as the raising of livestock.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Size: 5.1 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Rolling Hills Mobile Home Park
East: Century Avenue and a large undeveloped parcel in Oakdale
fronting on Century Avenue. It is planned for "community commercial"
use. This classification is similar to Maplewood's SC, service
commercial designation.
South: Century East Apartments
West: a double and five single dwellings
Past Actions (relevant to the Fifth Addition)
2 -7 -80:
Council conditionally approved Cave's Century Addition planned unit
development (PUD) and preliminary plat.
5 -15 -80 and 9 -4 -80:
Time extensions were approved for the preliminary plat and PUD,
subject to the original conditions:
6- 14 -82:
Council conditionally approved an amendment to the Cave's Century
Addition PUD and preliminary plat for the subject portion of the site.
Ref er to maps on pages 8 and 9 a) The amendment changed the s i t e ,
plan from 32 quad -style dwelling units (eight structures) to 32 town-
house units, consisting of four, eight -unit structures.
The original conditions of the PUD were deleted and the following
condition was added: "No Parking" signs being placed on the private
drives to maintain emergency vehicle access.
7- 25 -83:
Council approved a two -year time extension for the undeveloped
portions of the PUD and preliminary plat.
8- 12 -85:
Council approved a one -year time extension for the undeveloped portion
of Cave's Century Addition PUD and preliminary plat.
5- 19 -86:
The planning commission recommended denial of a request for a plan
amendment and an amendment of the PUD and preliminary plat to develop
4
Y
f
U
the Fifth Addition with convenience shopping uses, including motor
fuel sales. The applicant withdrew the proposal following this
recommendation.
8- 11 -86:
Council approved:
1. A one -year time extension for the PUD on the basis that the
applicant is making satisfactory progress in the phased development of
this site. Approval is subject to the condition of the 6 -14 -82
amendment to the PUD.
2. A one -year time extension for the preliminary plat to be
designated as Cave's Century Fifth Addition, subject to the original
conditions, as amended on 6- 14 -82. _
Planning
1. Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density
2. Zoning: F, farm residence, with a conditional use permit for a
PUD
3. Net area: 3.6 acres
4. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre
50 Proposed density:
a. Previously approved for entire PUD: 21.7 people /net acre
b. Present proposal for entire PUD: 21.2 people /net acre
6. Section 36 -442 requires ten findings to approve or revise a
conditional use permit. Refer to the resolution on page 12 for these
conditions:
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Rebecca Niedzielski of the MPCA stated that, based upon noise ievei
monitoring conducted on April 23, this site is consistent with state
requirements for maximum permitted noise levels in residential areas.
Procedure
1. Planning Commission recommendation
2. City Council decision following a public hearing
5
J y
N
Y
jl
Attachments
1. Beaver Lake Neighborhood Land Use Plan
20 Cave's Century Addition Planned Unit Development
3. Existing Preliminary Plat /Site Plan for Cave's Century Fifth
Addition
4. Proposed Cave's Century Fifth Addition
5. Letter of Request _
6. Resolution (PUD)
7. Resolution (Rezoning)
8. Preliminary Plat (separate attachment)
i
Mow
I
c:
ra
Lo
o
SC :G10
Larpenteur
Maryland Ave.
In
Stillwater Road
SC
414888961 Harvester
y S
t
Si.
A ,
0
Sc
Minnehaha
Bearer Lake
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
Attachment 1
Rolling Hills
mobile home park
o z o
Double dwellings •
io
Us""T . M^PMW000 Doc, • zzo ! - 4s f
3! avow y
r
17 • w I \N ~ • 1 ' ! 3 , Z 1 • , \300
Subj proper119
4 , 3 : 2t >> M z '1292 j . P Pe Ly
2 > > ( Proposed Cave' s
vvk - - -- - - -- 3(•y F .. ,.6} 3» x:1282 'rm s -,; (z ,, ' Z - ;;;,Century 5th Addition)
Quads 10*44 ,< 1
u) 7 /y V L A T L.0 r... —
f s 4 12 7 2 " , aM& rV ,
6 D r-1262- r - 1 1 I J • , = :
12 0411 10)7
11 137) CAN) $ V 2 1 '/• i..
6,, w G 9 '
1 Is X 6) V - 2 ).1248
r _ 3 .lid . ...,... .. 0
u) °' IS ,9.s
39) » c /4
3 1244 '}
2 0 v X19 '''
Q ~1 Toe 3 mX408 J
3.,21.7 ` 5 44 a!
2
22
o
u » 3<23 s Z M - 2; " ' W , 3 Century East j ,
t 0
J r
14 Single dwel l i n se OV s apartments 7
7 )
a 4 ti 0
27 "
a
43) ....,.., (g 's) 6
job
29 1606,30 '^ (lam) ' i . ; (x) 7
373 - .OS)t -76 Fw)
a 11 >t
0 (3 'rwaU Lt' 32 ° '31 c
S
S 4 - W - - -
570"
133 .° 34 (ioo (,• (yes) (•)
10 , {„ „ a1 , 22 23 24 .VEt( e•4 _ own housesll
a r ! s u' 3 S
V42 _i oo (KJ ) o
60A a os
MYHRA5.r Tow 37 3• 39 40 12 M 14 t -'•+' q 10 II 12 13
IVO
O < 79 ' ice' (5 E54
w (
S, : • 7' S!;. t, Ue r.; r2j ice: INJ
174610 - 3
j
S Ss
i
94 . 9Z' 9 5' DS' 49.5 33
82 goo
A
2G 1.4 33 33
4
N
W pT AIN
kir„ LwE , v r .44r Se At a - ni SE 1 A I T S R r- A c" ' •.. i
F)(I T /Nh Q, C 6AN . All
Aji (2
o
DRA/UAGE VTU i r t5
y 10I
OD
4L , Zo ,.
3
or
r T-
ly
Q g I tiUT11 -1 RA 1 £ CAM
r -
O Z 46 v }
OF
A .0 • 3 r - h ,n
A I YIN
rg
Low ' _ t '+ ,
p• hPD I
1100 eif
lo L - - -
i
z
C f-•-3 =- - ter lCCd
INV. i w• pN '
1UT1U•TY r^:5F -mF -r '
It
ot b !
le
Q - _ _. ; Tom- - ., i '
jou - ....
r_ ,..,,; ' .00h --- - . - __- - — 4 a , . •
1
I Pr, 6LD6.
PItELIMIltkRY .PLAT NTH ADDITION
Approved' 6-14-82)
r Attachment 3
9.
r
J 1
V
Ir
11
w
PREUMINARY GRADING PLAN PRE IMWARY PLAT
n
s
PROPOSED PRELIMINARY.PLAT
REVISION FOR 5TH ADDITION
10
Attachment.4
d
4 ,
p
ED CAVE & SONS, CAVE
S. GENERAL CONTRACTORS
2301 WOODBRI -DGE ST. SUITE 202 NEW HOMES
ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 LAND DEVELOPMENT
RENOVATION
COMMERCIAL
SAM CAVE, PRESIDENT
482.9667
February 2, 1987
Written statement concerning Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. PUD
application.
The parcel is currently approved for 32 Quad type townhouse
units. It is our request that you allow 20 twinhome units.
We believe the City should approve it because it is a use
permitted within the RM land use designation.
Attachment 5
11
L;.q -:. ue.m+'ta' =nor:. . „ r . :r.:.: ., : -: non:; wesw. :. L+ n. -,; N ,,tzr.,_.:t,:.,.r,M6.:c..tr.. xac+( nrarac. . rsu... :..-.:..: r ,c:.•xra._.._:,..r _:e.?t:€. .. . r .,_','tcv ,na.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the
City. Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was -duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the day of
1987 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. initiated a conditional use
permit to revise the Cave's Century planned unit development at the
following - described property: That part of the East 420.00 feet lying
northerly of the South 795.87 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 22 West of
the 4th Principal Meridian, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as follows:
10 This conditional use permit was initiated by Ed Cave and
Sons, Inc. pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
29 This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood
Planning Commission on April 6, 1987. The planning commission
recommended to the city council that said permit be .
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
19874 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All
persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard
and_present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of
the following findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive planandwiththepurposeandstandardsofthischapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
39 The use would be located, designed, maintained and opera
I
ted
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare,
Attachment 6
12
d
r
1
0
smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular-traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access
or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties,4 p P
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and P arks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements'
at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the city.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural
and scenic features into the development design.
109 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
10 Adherence to the site plan, dated February 6, 1987, unless a
change is approved by the city.
2. The footings for each double- dwelling structure shall be
pinned by a registered land surveyor prior to pouring the foundation
to insure that each party wall will be constructed exactly on the
common lot lines.
30 Deed restrictions shall be recorded against the title of
each lot before issuance of a building permit or a homeowners'
association agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Cave's
Century Fifth Addition plat to include, but not be limited to, the
following requirements,
a. Each double - dwelling structure shall have a uniform exterior
appearance in terms of color, design and maintenance.
b. If one unit is burned or destroyed, it shall be
reconstructed in a uniform appearance, and if both units are
burned or destroyed, minimum lot widths shall then prevail for a
single - dwelling home. A double dwelling may be rebuilt meeting
the original conditions of this section.
c. Any disputes shall be submitted to binding arbitration
according to the rules of the Minnesota Arbitration Association.
Adopted this day of , 1987.
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESOTA }
COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD }
13
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day f
1987, with the original on
y
file in my office, and the same is a
full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the citythisdayof , 1987.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
14
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the day of
1987 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm
residence, to R -1, single dwelling, for the following - described
property: That part of the East 420.00 feet lying northerly of the
South 795.87 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 24, Township 29 North, Range 22 West of the 4th Principal
Meridian, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article
VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances,
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on April 6, 1987. The planning commission recommended to
the city council that said rezoning be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
1987 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public
welfare.
15
Attachment 7
4 . The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools.
5. This. rezoning would eliminate the possibility of any future
nuisance complaints associated with uses permitted in a farm zone,
such as the raising of livestock.
Adopted this day of , 1987
Seconded by Ayes--
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of
1987 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full,true and complete transcript therefrom insofar. as the same relates to
this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the citPYthisdayof , 19879
City Clerk
City of Maplewood.
16
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. PUD Revision, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning: Cave's Century
5th Addition
Associate Planner Johnson discussed the request.
Sam Cave stated he hoped construction could begin by July.
Commissioner Fischer moved:
I. Approve the resolution to revise the northeast corner of the Cave's
Century planned unit development (PUID) to substitute 20 double-
dwelling units for 32 town -house units on the basis of the ten
standard findings for approval.
Approval is subject to the following conditions (obsolete language
is crossed out and new language is underlined):
fe4ete4e- emergeney.veh4e4e- aeeess7
1. Footings for the double. - dwelling structure) shall be pinned
by a registered surveyor to insure that the party walls are
constructed on the common lot lines.
2. Deed restrictions s.h.al 1 be recorded against the title of
each lot or a home owners association agreement shall be
recorded concurrently with the Cave's Century Fifth Addition plat
to include, but not be limited to, the fol lowi n re ui remen
required by Section 30 -16b of code):
a. Each double- dwelling structure shall have a uniform
exterior appearance in terms of color, design and
maintenance.
b - , If one unit is burned or destroyed, it shall be
econstructed in a uniform appearance, and if both units are
burned or destroyed, minimum lot widths shall then prevail
for a s i n l e -dwe.l i i n home. A double d w e l l i n g may be
re.bu'i 1 t meeting the o r i g i n a l conditions of t h i s section.
c. Any disputes shall be submitted to binding arbitration
according to the rules of the Minnesota Arbitration Association.
II. Approval of the revised preliminary plat for Cave's Century Fifth
Addition, subject to the following conditions being met prior to
final plat approval:
10 Final approval of drainage, utility and grading plans by the
city engineer.
2. Submittal of a developer's agreement, with required surety,
for the-required public improvements.
2 4 -6 -87
C
III. Adopt the enclosed resolution, rezoning Cave's Century Fifth
Addition from F, farm residence, to R -2, double dwelling.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal,
F i of a, Fischer, Hanson, S1 etten,
Whitcomb
B. Preliminary Plat: Cave's Nebraska Addition
Secretary Olsn discussed the request.
Sam Cave asked 'at what time contracts would .e signed with the county
which will allow for the additional lots o er 28. Chuck Ah1, Acting
City Engineer, es i mated J u 1 y 1st. Mr. A estimated complet of
the McKnight Road p oject at November 198. Mr. Cave asked that the
commission cons i der ' s costs and allow im the additional time to
complete all of Phase. of ,the b u i l d i n g . -
Commissioner Hanson move approval of ave's Nebraska Addition
preliminary plat, subject to the foll wing conditions being met before
final ' plat approval:
1. All necessary contracts ust be/executed by the county for the
construction of a trunk water ain within McKnight Road before final
plat application will be accep d or more than 28 lots. The
remaining lots in Phase .I may b final- platted after contracts are
signed for the McKnight Road con ruction.
If water is not available in Mc nig t Road, proposed Phase II shall
be platted as an outlot. A fin 1 pla for these lots can be applied
for once the McKnight Road wat r main 's functional.
2. Outlot A shall be expanded to includ the area agreed to between
the city and developer for a /park. Outlo A shall be dedicated to
the city for drainage and pqMk purposes.
3. The cit y w i l l pay for the additional par land and the cost of
paving the trails in the p rk from PAC funds. The developer shall
provide the grading ands surface materials f r the trails. If the
developer and parks di rector cannot agree on a ri ce for the two lots,
the developer shall pay f'r an appraisal, which hall determine the
price of the lots.
4. The ponding easement may go outside Outlot A. provided that all
lots have at least 10,00 square feet of area outside the easement.
5. A signed developer's agreement, with required surety, shall be
submitted for all required public improvements. This agreement shall
include, but not be limited to:
3 4 -6 -87
if
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
T0:
FROM
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
Endorsed.
Modified.,
Acting City Manager Re j eoted
Associate Planner -- Johnson Date
Rezoning ad Preliminary Plat
Lydia Avenue, East of Ar i el Street
Gerald Mogren and Richard Schreier
Lynnwood Terrace
April 1, 1987
SUMMARY
Request
Approve a rezoning
a preliminary plat
properties.
Proposed Homes
from F, farm residence to R -2, double dwelling and
to create fifteen smal 1- lot single-dwelling
Refer to the drawings on pages 13 - 16 for typical designs of the
proposed houses. Woodlynn Homes is proposed to be the builder. These
houses should range in price between $85 and $100,000. They have a
similar development under construction on Eldridge Avenue at 3rd
Street in North St. Paul,
Area Property Owners
Fifty property owners within 350 feet of the plat were surveyed;
twenty -five responded, fifteen were opposed, two had no comment, and
eight were in favor.
Those opposed to this project gave the following reasons:
1. The lots are too narrow. They should be the same size as the
others in the area,
Staff reply: This property has been designated RM, residential medium
density since the first city land use plan was adopted in 1973. This
designation allows for multiple dwellings and smaller -lot single
dwellings.
2. Multiple dwellings would be preferred to small -lot single
dwellings.
Staff reply: There are mixed feelings on this issue. The property
owners to the north prefer multiple dwellings so that a future
rezoning of their land for multiple- dwelling use will not
jeopardized.- If single dwellings are approved, they want their
property zoned for multiple dwellings now, so future single - dwelling
owners cannot object. Some residents prefer multiple dwellings
because there would be more open space and the design would be more
attractive. Other residents feel that smaller -lot single dwellings
would be more compatible in design and scale with the surrounding
homes.
3. The houses would be cheaper than we would like to see and would
not fit with the neighborhood.
Staff reply: Each house must be approved by the community designg
review board. See the planning section for the. requirements of
approval. The neighbors will be invited.
4. Fifteen additional driveways will worsen the traffic congestion
along Lydia Avenue. Limit drives to one for each two houses.
Staff reply: Lydia Avenue is a County road. Don Soler, the county
highway engineer, states that the average daily traffic (ADT) is low
enough, ( about 3 , 000 ) , that the proposed driveways will not be a
problem. The ADT along McKnight Road in this area is 6,000+ and there
are numerous driveways onto it.
5. This project will increase the current flooding problems on Lydia
Avenue at Furness Street and Beebe Parkway.
Staff reply: The engineering department is investigating this problem
to see if it is caused by a downstream blockage in the pipe, an
undersized i
P P '
pipe or lack of upstream ponding. The recommended storm -
water pond and pipe will help, by providing an overflow and duringgflooding. There will, however, be additional run -off from lots 9 -15.
Whether the pond will compensate for the additional run -off, cannot be
assured. As a result, plat approval should be contingent on the cityengineerresolvingthisproblembeforefinalplatapproval,
Of those in favor, several conditioned their approval on resolving the
drainage problems on Lydia Avenue and making sure that the new houses
are compatible in design with the existing homes.
Recommendation
10 Approve the resolution on page 17 to rezone this site from F,
farm residence to R -2, double dwelling. Approval is on the basis of
the four standard findings of approval in the resolution and the
following:
a. Small -lot single dwellings would be more compatible in
design and scale with surrounding development than multiple
dwellings.
b. This rezoning is consistent with the city's comprehensiveplan.
2. Approve the Lynnwood Terrace preliminary plat (plans dated 1-15 -
87) , subject to the following conditions being met before final plat
approval.
a. Reconciling the inconsistency in the north -south dimensions
of the site between the preliminary plat, the county base map,
and a certificate of survey completed by North Land Surveying
Company on 3/4/87.
f
b. Show a storm water ponding easement on the plat in the
vicinity of the north portion of Lot 14 or acquire a compensatingPg
easement on the property to the north and transfer it to the
city. The location of either easement shall be approved b thePPYcityengineer. If an easement is shown on one or more of the
proposed lots, these lots shall contain at least 7,500 squarefeetabovetheeasement,
c A twenty - foot -wide storm sewer easement shall be shown from
the ponding easement to Lydia Avenue. The location shall be
approved by the city eng i nee r.
d. Final grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans
to be approved by the city engineer. If a compensating drainage
easement is acquired to the north ( Condition Two) , the
compensating easement must be graded. Filling of the north partofLot14wouldthenbeallowed, but be subject to city engineerapprovalviathedeveloper's agreement.
e. Submittal of a developer's agreement and surety for
constructing separate water and sanitary sewer stubs to each lot.
fe Amending the subdivision ordinance to allow 60 -foot wide
lots in R -2 zones.
g. The city engineer resolving the drainage problem on LydiaAvenueatFurnessStreetandBeebeParkway.
3
BACKGROUND
Site tion
Gross area: 3.7 acres
Existing land use: undeveloped
Surrounding -Land Uses
North: Four undeveloped parcels. The westerly parcel has been
approved as part of the Salvation Army church site. The next lot to
the east is a 56 x 264 -foot land - locked parcel. It is not included in
the church site or the proposed subdivision. The owner wants to sell
it to the church or the applicant. Two two easterly lots are planned
for RM, residential medium density use.
East: A single dwelling on an 88 -foot wide lot.
South: Six single - dwelling corner lots, each with 135 feet of
frontage on Lydia Avenue. Each dwelling fronts on a side street that
intersects Lydia Avenue,
West: Ariel Street. Across the street is the back side of the Plaza
3000 shopping center.
Past Actions
12 -9 -85:
Council approved Cave's English Street Addition preliminary plat and
planned unit development (map on page 11 ) . This development includes
an-85 -foot wide corner and three 60 -foot wide interior lots. There
are conventional single dwellings across English Street,
4- 28 -86:
Council approved Cave's English Street 2nd Addition preliminary plat
and planned unit development. It includes five small -lot single-
dwelling
g
d ng properties. These lots ranged from 60 to 74 feet of width
and front three R -1- zoned single dwellings.
Planning
10 Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density
2. Zoning: present: F, farm residence
proposed: R -2, double dwelling
3. Net area: 2.8 acres
4. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre
5, Proposed density: 22 people /net acre
4
6. Policy criteria from the plan:
a. Page 18 -8: Residential areas should be encouraged, planned
and guided to provide a variety of housing types within
neighborhoods.
b. Page 18 -30: The RM land use classification is designed for
such housing types as single dwellings on small lots, double
dwellings, town houses and mobile homes.
7. Compliance with land use laws:
a. Section 30 -8 (f) (1) (d) of the platting code permits single -dwelling lots with "not less than 7 square feet in area it
designated as RM, residential medium density on the city land use -
plan."
b. Section 36 -90 states each single - dwelling lot with less than
75 feet of width shall have two side yards of not less than five
feet of width, but a total side yard area of not less than 15
feet of width. Only ten feet of side yard area is required in
standard single- dwelling subdivisons.
c. Section 30 -8 (f) (7) states "lots abuttin g uponon a water
course, drainage way, channel or stream.shall have additional
depth or width, as required, to assure house sites that are not
subject to flooding. Minimum lot areas shall not include
drainage easements."
d. Section 36 -485 requires four findings for approval of 'a
rezoning. These findings are listed in the resolution on eaPg
17.
e. Section 35 -67 states:
a) The community design review board shall have the powertodeterminewhetherornotsingle- family dwellings in
residential subdivisions containing seven thousand five
hundred (71500) square -foot lots are similar in exterior
design and appearance for the purposes of subsection (b) of
this section:
b) In all residential subdivisions allowing and
containing seven thousand five hundred (7 square -foot
lots, single - family dwellings having a similar exterior
design and appearance shall be located at least five hundred
500) feet from each other.
c) Dwellings shall be.considered similar in exterior
design and appearance for the purposes of this section, if
they have one or more of the following characteristics:
1) The same basis dimensions and floor plans are used
without substantial differentiation of one or more
exterior elevations.
5
2 ) The same basic dimensions and floor plans are
used without substantial change in orientation of the
houses on the lots.
3 ) The appearance and arrangement of the windows and
other openings in the front elevation, including the
appearance and arrangement of the porch or garage, are
not substantially different from adjoining dwellings.
4) The type and kind of materials used in the front
elevation is substantially the same in design and
appearance as adjoining dwellings."
Procedure
1. Planning commission recommendation
2. City council decision following a public hearing
mb
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Neighborhood Land Use Plan
4. Preliminary Plat (8 1/2 x 11)
5. Cave's English Street Additions
6. Excerpt from drainage plan
7 -10. Proposed house designs
11. Resolution
12. Preliminary Plat (separate attachment)
C
r
1 •
R3 a [3C; F
B C) R3 Av8C
R2 ......8 R2FF
R
Lyu R R
LYD A :
F a ft RL8C - AYi R
BC R .+ R - R
sc.
SC t• cr,N C C .
LBC LL Bum
R2 8 C(M)
R eR 3
PU0 R 7
F o • LaC ? R_ 3C
R2
F L._
PUS R • _
t x
R
OCR2
i
F R N
R
90 ` F R
EOGEHLL R
OE T
N 8 C F or
R o LBC 49
SEXTAN 2 F
r
R LAC 1
AV FE
AVE jj M ! R.
WAY
M t ~'C ' M! R
SO Cz
LR-
R
R 0
T 4 L_.J ar
R
1
j - LOCATION MAP :.
r
tk
N 7 Attachment 1
f
i
1 I.'30
a
y
r
WOODLY
3 s s .
TitOl
g
J V
S 6 7
1.4oc M o (3,41 (30) r
Proposed Salvationo e :
s
Army Church R - 4 C2 9
14
O Vti
000 _ o za oao 3021
Plaza 3 PLandlockPropertya67 ) ,6
41 r1979532(03 (03' 21 1
vS .got &C _ 14 z
4
25 3
3 I FT Ir
i'11 ------ -rl.6? p ot3t
MM _ rf -
t C
Zr4 G r r4 7 r GO ref G o ijS
13 ° Q y' o ' 0 2
2997; 3 29982995 Y ,
J ,
2994 = - (7) o
241 ` -- a 1 , 2146 a
Ix
J 3X75)
W h
i
rZ23) o , a m
Concordia Arms = DCoV LL. s _ t c
w
l s Z' ' 4 r
7 4 .-s4 4 (7 -7 )t 4 • (I Z; (9) a 5 • d 1
t0,
J _ 134-9 1,7. 5
C s ° d ti s A 5 , p ( o
w d (I v) o (3J • 1 6 0
134. +1 C,32 Z . l9
1 1
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
r
t
1
i
I
REVISED
1 12-30-8
Interchan
19--
Beim Avel
w
cc
4W
1•virl"'pul Paul At
3
M APLEWOOD HEIGHTS _ .
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
Attachment 3 19-13
Imo. J• + '1
0
N
White 84ar lake
ter..- .......r .. ». .WIF .'r• i."RM.. h••.. Y. s +.r„-- r.- .- .- ..- ........ -. r....,w- rv...r... ... -. «i- r .... -- ..- ... «.: -rc ..- .- +..'.. ... ,.. I. . Yxr. . e.¢!< YM .'v ? ^'..iTTr .vm- m' ..b , r>Mn. . <• "YY " R^fR ' " TY '^ tln 'nl.vv'.'-,m . '! 12 ::H.r -,w+ , s- I ^,^rt .. mrt .+- ^i ,,-. ti . *.e^- ra<,m- 1c . +n,•r.H.r .. ., ... :. .... ..w.,... ,.. ._• _ . - __._ :_,. c.._.. z c.. --•`------ t__. _._----`- -- - --- - -_..__ __.__.::._ _ ._ . ____ — ^.__ . - t__I: .... - :. __::.L__... . --'-- LL:.: Y_ _ T..L - __$^S°w "'+ _. 1 ImYlrm' .... mot' aw+.t?m _ . . .1•°q + sa^+ atr '°mxTMa• °amaa•ntm+•+
w
h my
uad 1 Apea N
4%
1 ; ? 3
Oy
e14 a>
3
e'siv
1
J 3
c
W. i w 2 11,680 Fit
Mo
b 1 _.
Y
a t L1 ^ 1 sv
O
ty
O • •
r
TTTiii • ` _ '
o NS9se3 f ,'. .•,
1 '
N
8aeck Mark.
ft Ca . d: • Ara. isa4w*:94 char Av&
Ek.. 930.17
t
b:..eb Ms.•k 1
Top y ran
So-,-^ Side Lpli&A6we•s t a * ,* rw sr. ROBERTa ##Ss.
3
D
C+
NN
Mr
V
L Y
uVI
ItQ
0x
a
xV
PRELIMINARY PLAT
OFfDL
C- LYNN WOOD TERRACE
DATEO: do m. 15, 1987
ra
VA
1% / 1 / 7 r-
1
r 1
Mole: dose n arc 1n A
3sa..w+lr srsilowl
s i,.y can 16.e.
liOtiS Osir.sit j1tiranwj'14'f Sp.1/s./lvavoon
A Cew /@%.r a w A we o.+
ro a is • .T . d .0c. -a S /tt, /? o JI. X7
A-.,.. Li•.I us•: /s 5. /e Fs•/ ; Res.•Ie.1,L: s./ t.fs
Mors: 46 en -s :le ralr -1 wJ // At a6ns J6 f/rs a'.ve/s0er, 14jra.ISn7 wnr ar Aan1 Ay ;,vW vid4Wi/ /s iF 4v-- Ws of
tP.we 1:r ho"A• t -v jyracs.4isn .
1_
Prepared For: Prepared By:
RICHARD SCHRE(ER BRUCE A. FOLZ & ASSOC.
JERRY MOGREN 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVE.
f
N
ST.. PAUL, MN 55109 telex 439 -8833
W
3 Z
Lff"L OeicRlp'nam%
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows:
W
Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 48 seconds West, assumed bearing,.along the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a
3 I
loo
degrees 36 minutes OS seconds West slong,said south line 812.79 feet to the 'Scale In F«t
r M
N
w 0,4Z
w .Y (o°o)3`Zgrtiwye
O
vai . *i
w to
di o 0
v<
4s ct 4t
1 W
Z
7 I WW /a
O
Toos T/l10 -oft 2 t •
It
ct
41600
MA
131t.
as
N
s . ,,. `
a R ` •.!t 4.war of w
3 NW1'11 •t Na. Nsiy e0
L.
y't
1 8•nc Mark
r eAv%1t7
op
Mi Ek +. iSS.67
n-h Mar
w
1
Too Wdrafti
W Caw Late a A.e.
awl Mrk.:Sa• aEh., 446."
t 0
1
as a t
i
Prepared For: Prepared By:
RICHARD SCHRE(ER BRUCE A. FOLZ & ASSOC.
JERRY MOGREN 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVE.
2582 WHiTE BEAR AVE. STILLWATER, MN 55082 N N
ST.. PAUL, MN 55109 telex 439 -8833
Wtele: 777 -2734 M
Lff"L OeicRlp'nam%
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 48 seconds West, assumed bearing,.along the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter adistanceof164.47 feet to the south line of the North 1321.33 feet of said
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter as measured at a right angle to thenorthlineofsaidNorthwestQuarteroftheNortheastQuarterthenceNorth09 • ss s°loo
degrees 36 minutes OS seconds West slong,said south line 812.79 feet to the 'Scale In F«t
north line of the South 5.16 acres (north line of the South 170.38 feet) of saidNorthwestQuarteroftheNortheastQuarterasmeasuredatarightangletothesouthlineofsaidNorthwestQuarteroftheNortheastQuarter; thence South 89degrees54minutes43secondsWestalongsaidnorthline177.14 feet to the eastlineoftheWest329.21 feet of said Northwest Quarter of .the Northeast QuarterasmeasuredatarightangletothenestlineofsaidNorthwestQuarterofthe
Northeast Quarter;. thence South OO degrees 1S minutes 41 seconds East along saideastline170.38 feet to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds East along saidsouthline989.98 feet to the point of beginning, containing 3.81 acres, more orless.
WO i INJI M AVE:.MWv
see tea«, j I.
ft -
Ii V
1 • • 4
AV E0 was
o .. ,
is
sT! 6
14 1r f At 7 • "
oft a
Cave's English Street Addition
Approved 12 -9 -85) -
r
1 t4 2 t 51 Rr
11
v
M » t •
ItoROAD
1
r
1IM es=J • •
or Ille
K
Im Aw a • .•.. .
fir.._•' ..+.. .... ,
a 1 l$ » 19 T s Cave s En Street 2nd Addition
I 4 • ; (Approved 4-28-k ' t
4934
0 d% 0
f
I -- _ SEC1&0 .00 * -
m ell"*
Ae 04.
C 7
E
ill 0
ei > t
Note
Caves English Street •9 eet Additions
Small —Lot Single — Dwelling Lot
o R -1
9 s
fronting Zoned Property)
Attachment 5
l
s
7
fei
r
I
20 AF
130 _..._..mw..m ._..._ ..../
i
f
1
t -- --- f
so
0000...
41
f
r '
5 AF
v
0000 — .
J
l
MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE
INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES
PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42..
L -=- = EXISTING STORM SEWER
OPEN CHANNEL
STORM WATER STORAGE AREA
INUNDATION AREA
STORAGE AREA VOLUME.4 aF
DISCHARGE IN CFS
CITY LIMITS .
i
W
D
CL
C+
2 .- .. ..4.- ti - a:'. r..,d'. yi - +;r.ls. ..'y .s '; .._a+K'.. .' . _.. ..,.. .. "a« ., _....:: -:, r....:.:::r "+. •rR- r +...ti..(...« a..B -. .„.. .._ hs' -, ..iii'.. _ >.. .W_,.t%.i:`.rttL{• +.. •rr .::friic , M - :Iwi'+r IYL. i:9sa
r .. - ,... ... - ..i :,...... ., ri •<.•,riR -: d. . -.. , _ia , . .<... o. ., .x,: Y .C ^+„.^.:= wt.`. -.rrr r , ..-e: •n -a ...'."''.. , , _ -: -r. ,. a ... _.,
j !jr!j
to Now
I!! : ' yea,«• ic ;...',L'A'i'..,.a. '6RK.: vR_C.L•A;;:K YZ:,!...ri .fi
7'Y,$ tac+id'el.k . . x' :F . iP.. ":fLL ..... y: .
s . .,.ice •'':,fl} i:. ' ,rt'wr.n •_. „,.. .... ... r , 'rH . ;. < 4 " ^. - v ., .... - • x+uYwry. -. .. •7tMs;::+iii.iril'f' i". .`i4:+:ek.xs:.wa'i:iwrnr ,;:,.: ,,, T`" ""-a",: -
r.-
r.,. .. . ya:+c*a .. ,}rrss;,•sM'e+n^r:r`'t . ` .w x: Me K w - li
W.- ^ ..•.w .tim 'a:...'.w:.1 %..dL41+,AW
MOO
Na•,<aq.+r+rn` -. . ar+MleYr -a•. 7 ,fir;¢
i'.:.: f oia• -.a.l ,af: i c:- r...s: - - .. , . ., r "'a`C , c' - iriroi„,. oe:, :.Sa:.....: =... ,._
i °•'1M T, P r . ; . -:, 4y., i.
5:_... :Si};'•F:'Y. " Not
1M
kx
r ._: Y•fin b ': 1
P
1 .... -_. .• - -
e....., ....Y.'µ_
t .::
e11LP *w .._ .. .+ -^ •. .,.- .. .... _ •.. _• ,... _ .. .... - _ yw.. ` ...... . ...... - •
mM•, ..`fir.• -. :t•K.r .. ... - ... .+. -r.. - ..,
w ti
r
Q" '.. . ,.: _.r. ... A^..: 4 Rr '4' , s.. y -... ... .. .;www ..' ' - _ _ • .. . a,.. ....... a ... . y.:. - . . .. _ .. w . _
T. +•,.,.yr<. _ - ..sa..,. .. ',< 'iY ..•M7'FM+MN.' .:lr.L 'in:t•'... o.:r`: *..
f ' - • ,A.eiCt ivr:,, 13 .? y a .¢,t. i` f .. y ' .. a
y + } 3
dill
R tom' f
e .
r ^ - . r ,*, . _ ,. .
rlb kY+m !"'+'k ' ' ' '4 r s
t ; ` ..•
e
J . ` , > , d 4` ,, t ' ' b •Iria- +IW - ". "- , ' y <.A ' ^ y i • ' ^ '7 '•
r.w• -• ,."_ .. .;i4w -. .. q +M : ijS•t`;i '
r s -- _ - -- -
r
M . 'n- i .
Y '
t'i 4 f i...r'f wR*i [n.s F• ' - /
r - •'"'"'R!"t.e.4 + W.y ' .kr ' y'.: r'a,1f -' t'a'r . i.:'.RS"e • ..n' c'f'ti
S h' IL ` =.x . • . , ter. ... -. _.. . .. :
r ..s'' u •:z `. .- ti.` "' '
7 + ` _- S
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the day of
1987 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Gerald Mogren and Richard Schreier initiated a rezoning
from F, farm residence to R-2, double dwelling for the following-
described property:
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota
described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 17 minutes 48
seconds West, assumed bearing, along the east line of said
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 163.47
feet to the south line of the North 1321.33 feet of said
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter as measured at a right
angle to the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds
West along said south line 812.79 feet to the north line of the
South 5.16 acres (north line of the South 170.38 feet) of said
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter as measured at a right
angle to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds
West along said north line 177.14 feet to the east line of the
West 329.21 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter as measured at a right angle to the west line of said
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South 00
degrees 15 minutes 41 seconds East along said east line 170.38
feet to the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds East along
said south line 989.98 feet to the point of beginning, containing
3.81 acres, more or less.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezonign is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article
VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances,
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission can April 6, 1987. The planning commission recommended to
the city council that said rezoning be
17 Attachment 11
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
1987 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given. an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission. _
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above- described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public
welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and
facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools.
5. Small -lot single dwellings would be more compatible in design
and scale with surrounding development than multiple dwellings.
Adopted this day of , 1987.
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of
1987 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full,
true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to
this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 19 8 7,
City Clerk
City of Maplewood,
IN
E. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat: Lynnwood Terrace
Gerald Mogren, 2855 Frederick Street and Richard Schreier, 2125 Desoto
Street, applicants for the requested project, were present.
Mr. Mogren questioned the acting city.engineer about the area assessments
and what the area would be for the holding pond. Mr. Ahl, acting city
engineer, said the area would be approximately 500 square feet of this
parcel. Mr. Mogren and Mr. Schreier questioned the cost of the storm
sewer easement being assessed totally..to them.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved:
1 . Approval of the resolution to rezone t h i s s i t e from F, farm
residence to R -2, double dwelling. Approval is on the basis of the
four standard findings of approval in the resolution and the following:
a. Small -lot single dwellings
design and scale with surrounding development than multiple
dwellings,
b. This rezoning is consistent with the city's comprehensive
plan.
2. Approval of the Lynnwood Terrace preliminary plat, subject to the
following conditions being met before final plat approval:
a. Reconciling the inconsistency in the north -south dimensions
of the s i t e between the preliminary plat, the county base map,
and a certificate of survey completed.by North Land Surveying
Company on 3/4/87.
b. Show a storm water ponding easement on the plat in the
vicinity of the north portion of Lot 14 or acquire a compensating
easement on the property to the north and transfer it to the
city. The location of either easement shall be approved by the
city engineer. If an easement is shown on one or more of the
proposed lots, these lots shall contain at least 7,500 square
feet above the easement.
c. A twenty- foot -wide storm sewer easement shall be shown from
the ponding easement to Lydia Avenue. The location shall be
approved by the city engineer.
d. Final grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans
to be approved by the city engineer. If a compensating drainage
easement is acquired to the north (Condition Two), the
compensating easement must be graded. Filling of the north part
of Lot 14 would then be allowed, but be subject to city engineer
approval via the developer's agreement.
e. Submittal of a developer's agreement and surety for
constructing separate water and sanitary sewer stubs to
each lot.
6 4 -6 -87
f. Take no position on the payment of the construction of
a storm sewer to outlot the pond required in Condition Two,letting the city council make a decision on assessments baseded
on past policy.
g. Amending the subdivision ordinance to allow 60 —foot wide
lots in R -2 zones.
h. The city engineer resolving the drainage problem on LydiaAvenueatFurnessStreetandBeebeParkway,
Commissioner Hanson seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal
Fiola, Fischer, Hanson, Sletten,
Whitcomb
F, ational Planning Conve ion
Commis ioner Fiola said s e is considering attending the convention.
IX. UNFINISH BUSINESS
A. Annual eport and Work Program
Commissioner ische moved to table this item.
Commissioner Wh 't omb_ seconded Ayes- -Axdah l , Barrett, Cardinal,
Fiola, Fischer, Hanson, Sl etten
Whitcomb
X. COMMISSION PR ENT TIONS
A. Council eeting: March 23, 1987
XI, STAFF PRESVNTATIONS
A. Coun i l Meeti ng- -Apr ' 1 13, 1987: Dennis Larson
B. The Metro East Coaliti n
X I I . ADJOU MENT
Meet ng adjourned at 10:37 p.m.
7 4 -6 -87
9-/
by (,ouncil .-I
MEMORANDUM Endorsed
A'o ri !J i f i el d—,
Rejlected..—...
TO: Actin Cit Mana Date
FROM: Actin Cit En
SUBJECT: Hillwood Drive Construction (Crestview to Marnie)
Cit Project 86-05
Award of Bids
DATE: April 20, 1987
On April 13, 1987, the cit council held an assessment hearin on the
Hillwood Drive construction project. There were no appeals filed,
either prior to or at the hearin
It is recommended that the council award the bid to the low bidder,
Danner, Inc. in the amount of $100,961,85, b passin the attached
resolution. Danner, Inc. has worked several projects within the cit
in the past years and the work has been good quality and completed in
a timel manner,
mb
Attachment
RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
that the bid of Danner, Inc., in the amount of $100,961.85 is the
lowest responsible bid for the construction of Hillwood Drive
from Crestview Drive to Marnie Street, Cit Project 86-05, and
the ma and clerk are hereb authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city,
6 cz
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City, Manager
FROM Finance Director --
Award of Bids for t e Lease - Purchase Financing
of a Computer System
DATE: ,April 21, 1987
Action by Council
Endorse
Mod-f'e
at e - - - --
PROPOSAL
It is,_proposed that the Council award the bid for the lease- purchase financing
of the new computer system to Norwest Investment Services, Incorporated.
RAUr,POIINn
On December 8th the City Council authorized staff to enter into contract
negotiations with NCR /Eden Systems for the purchase of a computer system.
These contract negotiations are in the final phase and it is planned that a
contract proposal will be ready for Councia approval on May 11th.
The 1987 Budget provides that the computer. system wi l 1 be financed by the
Capital. Improvement Project. Fund using proceeds . from the sale of the old
City Hall. During. budget meetings with the Council last sep.tember i t . .:was.
agreed that, if the old City Hail was not sold in 1987, the ._:,new- computer
system would be financed by a lease - purchase contract. On April 20th, bids
were opened for. l ease- purchase financing and a tabulation i s . attached . The
low bid was submitted by Norwest Investment Services at 6.73/ on a five -year
l ease- purchase contract. Council award .of this bid on April 27th is neces-
sary in order to "lock -in" this rate as it expires on April 30th.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council award the bid for the lease- purchase
financing of the new computer system to Norwest Investment Services,
Incorporated.
DFF:lnb
BIDS FOR THE LEASE /PURCHASE OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM
4/20/87
Bidder Bids
5-Year 3 -Year
Lehigh Municipal Leasing and o8.75/08.24/Commercial Lease Fund
Maryland National Leasing. Corporati 6.85 6.82
NCR Credit Corporation Hardware 8.15 7.15
Software.13.00 13.00
Norwest Investment Services, Inc.6.73 7.10
Marquette Lease Services , Inc .7.10 7.10
Monthly PaymentsSecurityPacificMerchantBanksngGroupSemi - Annual Payments
7.59
7 -3 9
7.54
7.24
Chrysler Capital 7.34 7.18
J /
J
j .
Action by Council..
Endorsed
ORDINANCE NO, od.ifi od. ,
AN ORDINANCE INCREASING THE SIZE OF Date
PYLON SIGNS IN LBC AND CO DISTRICTS
The Maplewood City Council does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Section 36- 330(2) is amended as follows
additions are underlined):
2) The total area of a freestanding sign shall not exceed eightygY
80) square feet on a lot of two acres or less or 120 square feet
on a lot with more than two acres.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and
publication.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council
this 13th day of April, 1987,
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes- -
Nayes --
n
s
J
VAN :Maplewood
State Bank
WHITE BEAR AND BEAM AVENUES
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 (612) 777 -7700
February 25, 1987
Thomas Ek'strand, Associate Planner
Office of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 E.' County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Proposed Sign Code Amendment
Dear 'Mr. Ekstrand:
Thank you for reviewing our sign code amendment proposal at the Maplewood
Community Design Review Board meeting on February 24, 19870
We understand that no action was taken, which in effect denied the request.
Therefore, we would l i k e to appeal their decision to the City Council as
soon as possible.
After listening to the discussion from the various members of the Design
Review Board, we would like to change our proposed amendment so that the
following become the maximum areas for pylon signs in the CO and LBC
districts:
Lot Area Maximum Sign . Copy. Area
2 acres or less 80 sq. ft.
more than 2 acres 120 sq . ft.
We woul wel me your comments, Thank you for your courtesy and consideration.
1 e y urs,
G. Jack illstrom
Presid t
GJH /pm
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
City Manager
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Sign Code Amendment - Freestanding signs ing
LBC and CO Districts
Maplewood State Bank (Jack Hillstrom)
February 18, 1987
SUMMARY
Request
Increase the 80- square -foot maximum area for pylon signs in the LBC,limited business commercial, and CO, commercial office districts.
Proposal
1. The applicant is proposing the following maximum areas for Py lonsignsintheCOandLBCdistricts:
Lot Area Maximum Si n Copy Area
6 sq. ft. or less 80 sq, ft.
6,OOO sq. ft, to 1 acre 150 sq. ft.
More than 1 acre 200 sq,. ft,
2o Refer to the applicant's letter (page 3.)
Reason for the Request
The applicant feels that the sign requirements for LBC districts are
too restrictive, especially in comparison to the BC; business
commercial, zone.
Alternatives (from most to least restrictive:)
1. Take no action.
2. Approve a variance.
3. Increase the maximum sign to 120 square feet to allow the
proposed sign.
4. Increase the maximum size as proposed by Mr. Hillstrom
5. Rezone the site to BC (M) , business commercial modified.
Comments
Maplewood State Bank is proposing an amendment to allow them to
enlarge and upgrade their electronic sign and message center to a
total of 118.5 square feet. Their proposal. would allow signs of up to
200 square feet for sites over one acre. Thirteen other cities were
surveyed. only three allowed signs over 80 square feet in office
districts. of these three, the largest is 140 square feet. The
median s i z e is 64 square feet, (,See the survey on page 5 ) . The
other four banks.around the Mall were also checked. They are zoned
BC, business commercial:
Midwest Federal
First Minnesota
Norwest Bank
Maplewood State Bank
Twin City Federal
no pylon sign
no pylon sign
63 square feet
78 square feet
100 square feet
The LBC zone is designed to be a buffer between residential and
heavier commercial districts. We should be cautious about enlargingggsignareasinthesedistricts. Based on what other cities allowow andthesignareasoftheotherbanksaroundtheMall, it does not appearthatanincreaseinthecurrentmaximumsignareaisjustified,,
Recommendation (at least 4 votes for approval)
Take no action.
kd
Attachments
1. Letter
2. Survey
2
E
r
Maplewood
State Bank
WHITE BEAR AND BEAM AVENUES
MAPLEW000, MINNESOTA 55109
December 3, 1986
612) 777 -7700
01111 _
9 -W-eAA4U...W -tx&Aovtyk;olult un ii
City of Maplewood
1902 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: MAPLEWOOD ZONING CODE
Section 36 -330, Requirements. Subdivision 2
Gentlemen /Ladies:
We would 1 ike to request a change in the sign code portion of the
ordinance as it relates to LBC zoning. We are presently restricted
to 80 square feet of s ignage . B C Zoning as stated in Section 36 -352
Subdivision 2 permits freestanding business sign bearing from 150
square feet up to 300 square feet.
We want to upgrade our identification sign that incorporates an
electronic message center display. The unit we wish to install is
approximately 6 x 17 a total of 110.5 square feet. In addition,
we have a small instant cash sign on the same standard which contains
approximately 8 square feet. This new unit will allow us, to display 12
twenty one inch high characters at a time whereas we are now limited to
9 The new display would let us. do a better job of communicating with
the public. Many of our messages are public service or community
messages or announcements. With our existing sign, we have to use the
travel" mode too much of the time and it is difficult to read. The
new matrix w i l l allow u s. -to use other modes of changing the messages
that are quicker to change and easier to read.
We request that Section 36 -330 Subdivision 2 be changed to read as follows:
The maximum area of a freestanding business sign shall be as follows:
Lot Area Total Sign Copy Area
6,000 sq. ft. or less 80 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft. to 1 acre 150 sq. ft.
More than 1 acre 200 sq. ft.
3 -
Mayor John Greavu
City Counc i 1 members -2- December 3, 1986
We feel that asking for a change in the * ordinance is a fairer
thing to do than to request a variance or to apply for a special use
permit. Please place our request on the agenda the next city council
meeting an notify us of the schedule. If any further information is
req d, ease do not hesitate to contact us.
S er .ours,
G. Jack Hillstrom
President
GJH /pm
4 -
r
J
SURVEY
PYLON SIGNS -- MAXIMUM SIZE PERMITTED
2 -12 -87
4
Municipality
Maplewood
General Commercial District Office District
Woodbury
North St. Paul
150 sq.ft. (lot under 6,000 sq.ft.80 sq. ft.
250 sq. ft. ( lot 6,0 00 sq. ft, to 1 acre)
100
300 sq. ft. ( lot over 1 acre)
80 sq. ft.
ft,
Fridley
80 sq. ft.
Combined area for all signs -2 sq.ft. /lineal
20%of wall surface area
sq.
foot of bldg.
up to 200 sq.ft,
36
frontage up to
i
5-
24 sq.ft.
Burnsville 150 sq. ft.100 sq,ft.
Plymouth 96 sq. ft.64 sq,ft,
Fridley 80 sq. ft.48 sq.ft.
Blaine 140 sq. ft.140 sq.ft.
New Brighton 64 sq, ft,36 sq.ft,
Golden Valley 2 sq. ft. of sign area /lineal 40 sq,ft.
front foot of the building
example: a building being 100 wide
could have a 200 sq. ft. pylon)
Apple Valley 125 sq. ft.40 sq.ft.
Eagan 125 sq, ft.125 sq.ft.
Maple Grove 70 sq. ft.70 sq.ft.
Columbia Heights 32 sq. ft.32 sq.ft.
Oakdale 80 sq, ft.80 sq. ft.
Median Size:64 sq.ft.
i
5-
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1987 7 P.M.
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
I. CALL.TO ORDER
Chairman Moe called the meeting.-to order at 7 P . m.
II. ROLL CALL
Donald Moe Present
Tom Deans Present
Bobs Peterson Absent _
Jim Kochsiek Present
Earl. Marlow Present
Marvin Erickson Present
III.. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. January 13, 1987
Board Member Kochsiek moved approval of the minutes of January 13, 1987
as submitted.
Board Member Deans seconded Ayes- -all
B. January 27, 1987
The board amended the minutes on page 1 to read west instead of north
regarding the location of Mai nstreet at the Maplewood Mall,
Board Member Deans moved a roval of the minutes as amended, PPP d, of
January 27, 1987.
Board Member Marlow seconded Ayes - -all
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Board Member Marlow moved approval of the agenda as submitted.
Board Member Kochsiek seconded Ayes- -all
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Sign Code Amendment -- Maplewood State Bank
Jack Hillstrom, President of Maplewood State Bank, was present,
Mr. Hillstrom gave a presentation of Maplewood State Banks proposal. He
disagreed with the recommendation and again requested the change in the
ordinance. He noted the present sign size is just under 80 square feet
and the new sign would be 118 square feet.
e .
4
The board questioned whether there had been comment from the traffic engineer
or police as to their impression of how the proposed sign would affect traffic.
Secretary Ekstrand stated he had not had any response from them. The board
questioned.whether any property had a similar request in the past. SecretaryEkstrandstatedvarianceshadbeengrantedinthepastforsignheightbased
on a proven hardship. The board discussed the history of the sign ordinance
and the p o s s i b i l i t y of reviewing it again in the future.
Board Member Deans moved to take no action on the proposal to amend the
sign code.
Board Member Kochsiek seconded Ayes - -all
B. B u i l d i n g Exterior Review--NAPA Auto Parts
Jim Newell attended as a representative of NAPA Auto Parts. Mr. Newell
explained NAPA Auto Parts' request, The board stated their concern that
this proposal could set a precedent. Various methods of restoring the
concrete block were discussed.
Board Member Deans moved denial of the proposal on the recommendation of
the staff.
Board Member Moe seconded Ayes - -Moe, Deans
Nayes -- Erickson, Kochsiek
Marlow
Board Member Marlow moved denial of the proposal based on conditions 1, 2
and 3 of the staff recommendations.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Board Member Marlow moved for denial of the request by NAPA Auto Stores - for
a blue store front at the Plaza 3000 north annex, on the basis that:
1 . The blue s tore f ront det racts from the b u i l d i n g ' s uniform design and
appearance.
2. Approval of this request would circumvent the function and purpose of
the community design review board, which strives to attain attractive building
design.
3. Approval would set a bad precedent, making it difficult to deny similar
requests in multi- tenant strip malls.
The applicant shall restore the concrete block store front and the lower
fascia to their original color by June 1, 1987. This shall be done by sand—
blasting, or any other process other than painting, which would expose the
original materials of the facade.
Board Member Kochsiek seconded Ayes --all
2 2-24-87
1 rwl
iy
Action by Counci ir
Endorse
ModIIf i e
e j ected. ,
Date
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Exterior Siding
DATE: April 6, 1987
The city has received citizen complaints regarding homes in their areas
that have never had the exterior finished. These homes exist with black
tar paper, insulation board or unfinished plywood which creates an aesthetic
problem for the surrounding homeowners trying to sell their homes. We do
not have an ordinance which addresses this problem and, therefore, have
not been able to respond to these complaints.
We recommend that the council adopt this ordinance.
j1
En.cl osures: 1. Ordinance
2. Letter
r
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE COMPLETION OF THE
EXTERIOR FINISH OF RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 9 -7 is added as follows:
Section 9 -7. Exterior completion: The exterior finish on all residential
d w e l l i n g s and their accessory buildings shall be completed within six months of
the date the permit is issued. Refinishing of existing buildings shall be
completed
P
Pl eted within six months of the start of the work. Any owner of a dwelling
that does not comply with this code, at time of the code's passage, shall have
P
six months from the date of written notification of such to bring the dwelling
into com P l i ance. Tar paper, unfinished plywood, fiberboard insulation, foam
insulation., brown coat or scratch coat of stucco, plastic sheeting and other
s imilar materials not designed to be an exterior finish shall not be considered
Panacceptable exterior finish. The building official may grant a 90 -day _
extension if there is an unusual hardship, such as bad weather. Further time
extensions must be approved by the -city council."
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and
publication.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council
this day of 9 1987 •
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes- -
Nayes--
i
N yi . • • ..• . .. ..rte. . ._. w_.. _. s_.r -._. _ _ _ _.w_. _._..._._...._.__ .A+V. 1 ..MiJ^r..._.._.•_ - M._. ...w .•• _ .__. .r. _.. .. _- _
OWL- ._ELM ^4 (?V
L
lhb
to
4pAc- .Oz
4.
Koo--
i -,4 / 1-0011 '40
Ar
tie-
r
a
a
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
APRIL 14, 1987
7B. Code Amendment — Exterior Siding
Commissioner Connelly moved and Commissioner Carlson seconded to
recommend that council approve the proposed code amendment requiring
the ext of d w e l l i n g s to be completed within si of the
start of work, subject to adding the following language: "any owner
of a dwelling that does not comply with this code, at time of the
code's passage, shall have six months from the date of written
notification of such to bring the dwelling into compliance." Motion
carried unanimousl
y
k
t
MEMORANDUM
TO: Acting City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Paratransit
DATE: April 21,198 7
r -i
Action b ouncils
El ndcrse
Mod. " if i ed
Rejecte ..
Date
Request
1. Authorize staff to enter into the attached joint powers agreemen with
North St. Paul and Oakdale to study the feasibility of developing a para-
transi t system.
2, Approve a budget transfer of $600 from the contingency account to
have a grant application prepared.
Background
Representatives from Maplewood, North St. Paul and Oakdale have been studying
the feasibility of providing a paratransit service - a door -to -door dial -a-
ride subscription service using two 15- passenger minibuses. (See attached
project description.) Counci lmember Wasi 1 uk is representing Maplewood.
The committee sent out 14,000 surveys. (See attached survey.) Eight percent
were returned. Sixty -five percent of those returned were in favor of t h i s
project.
The committee's next step is to form an organization to submit an applica-
tion for a grant from the regional transit board. This grant would pay
for 60% of the operating costs. Refer to the budget on pages 7 -9 of the
attachment. Note that Maplewood's share of the first year's cost is
projected to be $16,471. This request would be submitted to the council
at budget time.
Recommendation
Approve the request.
kd
Attachments
1. Paratransit Proposal
2. Survey
3. Joint Powers Agreement
Gregory L. Andrews, Executive Director
Regional Transit Board
Suite 270 - Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Mr. Andrews:
The Cities of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale, in a joint powers
agreement, are making plans to provide a paratransit public transportation
service within their city limits. The service would be a door -to -door
dial -a -ride and subscription service, using two 15- passenger mini_ buses .
The Cities of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale believe this proj Ect
provides a solution to the public transportation problems which many
citizens experience with the existing MTC fixed route service. The
proposed paratransit service would complement the existing MTC service
by providing a "link" to the MTC fixed route service, as well as
providing local transportation within the three cities.
If you agree that this project merits further consideration, we would
like to submit a more detailed proposal We realize, of ' course, that
funding of such a proposed transportation project depends on the
outcome of the current legislative session. However, we believe our
proposed paratransit project coincides with the Regional Transit Board's
plans for improving public transportation in the Twin Cities' metro
area.
we look forward to hearing from you on the advisability of our pursiling
the pro i ect further. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
f
NORTH ST. PAUL- MAPLEWOOD- OAKDALE
PROPOSED PARATRANSIT PROJECT
Submitted to REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD
May 1987
Judy Hutchinson
COMMUNITY SERVICE MANAGEMENT, INC.
2561 Crestline Drive
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
612) 770 -2447
DESIGN OF PROPOSED PARATRANSIT SERVICE
The design of the proposed paratransit service may be slightly
altered as the need arises. However, the proposed service would
include the following:
Two mini -buses (15- passenger)
Door -to -door service
Dial -a -ride and subscription service
1 $1.00 fare per passenger ride
Area served: Cities of North St. Paul., Maplewood, Oakdale
e Service days: Monday through Friday (Sunday morning service
may be considered but would probably replace a weekday morning
service time)
9 Service hours: 7:15 A.M. to 5:15 P.M.
I Dispatcher hours: 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M.
0 Phone reservations necessary at least two hours prior to
desired pickup time
0 May possibly go out of service area to Hillcrest Shopping
Center and Sun Ray Shopping Center in order to meet
MTC transfer points
1- -
r
BACKGROUND
The Cities of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale, having formed
a joint powers agreement, request consideration of a proposed paratransit '
program to begin C.Y. 1988. The program would provide public transportation
primarily for citizens of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale who are
unable to utilize the existing MTC service. The paratransit program
would provide a "link" with existing MTC service for those c
who have indicated a desire to use existing MTC service if they could
reach the MTC fixed route via the paratransit service. The paratran
service would also provide public transportation for those citizens who
are not certifiable for Metro Mobility (scheduled to serve the area in
January 1988), but who are not close enough to an MTC fixed route to
use the MTC service.
A survey taken in the months of January through March 1987 indicates
pub is support for such a proj ect . ' The key results of the survey, to
date, are as follows:
1. Responses - Of 14,000 surveys mailed in the three cities,
1,040 were filled in and returned. This is a response rate
of 8% and is high for this type of survey, thus indicating
a high level of interest in the proposed paratransit project.
2. Results - Both direct and indirect techniques were used in
the survey to obtain an indication of whether the respondent
was favorable or unfavorable to the paratransit project,
On direct questioning, 65% were favorable to the project.
An additional 2% were indirectly favorable to the project.
2_
a
This latter group responded unfavorably to the question Of
interest in the project but went on in their returns to
answer how they would use the service, thus indirectly
indicating . interest in the project.
3. Reliability - By all standards of statistics, the results
are significant. A high response rate, coupled with definite
positive direct question ' results and supported further by
indirect positive responses, requires little formal analysis
and answers the primary questions, "Will the service be used ?"
Who will use the service ?" and "What major categories of use
will the service be put to ?"
4. Relevant conclusions - A survey of this type, i.e., mailing
to every household in the three cities, is useful in obtaining
an indication of interest by the general population and in
determining whether the citizens perceive a use for such a
service. This type of survey is less useful in quantifying
the volume of ridership likely to be obtained. However,
experience in neighboring communities who have a similar
r _
paratransit service provides a relatively reliable guide to
probable ridership after the service is established.
Public meetings were held in each of the three cities involved
in the proposed project. Total attendance was approximately
50 people, and the response at the meetings was definitely
positive toward the project. An estimated 20 phone calls
to the coordinator of-the project were also positive.
3-
II
In fact, the few negative responses among the surveys
returned indicated a fear of "exorbitant tax increases"
as the only reason for the negative response. Many
indicated that they were favorable. to the ° concept of the
paratransit project, but voted negatively on the concept
to avoid a tax increase.
According to the survey, the main use of the paratransit service
would be for shopping needs, followed by medical /dental appointments
and transportation to /from place of employment. Survey results
indicate the strongest interest and probable use by citizens in
the age range of 35 -64 years. General statistics in the State of
Minnesota indicate a stable and predictable income level 'for the age
range of 35 -64 years, so it may be possible to operate the paratransit
service with fares higher than $ per passenger ride after the
service is established. There also is the possibility of soliciting
financial and advertising support from the local business communities
based on the survey results indicating "shopping" as a main reason to
use the paratransit service. There are several major shopping areas
within the three cities' area which would serve as "hubs" for the
paratransit service. The shopping areas would also provide natural
links to existing MTC service routes.
The neighboring communities of Birchwood, White Bear Township and
City of white Bear Lake, under the joint powers agreement of White
Bear Area Transit, have a population considerably less than the joint
4-
w .
con nunities of North St . Paul. Maplewood and Oakdale. (White Bear Area:
31,140; North St, Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale area: 55,153.) The
North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale area is larger geographically
than the White Bear area. However, the population is denser and there
are considerably more community areas drawing large numbers of people.
The statistics for the White Bear Area Transit service indicate an
average of 5 passengers per hour on each of their two vans. Because
of the geographic similarity of the White Bear area to the North St. Paul ,
Maplewood and Oakdale area, and considering the density of population
and amount of "hubs" in the latter area, an estimate of 5 passengers
per hour seems probable. Ridership of 5 passengers per hour, on two
vehicles per 10 -hour day, with 256 days of service in 1988, brings the
estimated number of passengers on the proposed paratransit proj ect to
28,000.
Administration of the proposed paratransit proj ect would be by
two elected officials from each of the three cities, with day-to-day
management by an independent contractor coordinator and service
operation by an independent contractor service provider. The management
coordinator, reporting directly to the elected officials, would provide
office space and equipment, and wo.bld represent the cities as spokes-
person for the service. The service provider would provide all vehicles,
drivers, dispatchers and staff, and wauld absorb all costs of insurance,
fuel, taxes, vehicle cost and upkeep and miscellaneous operational costs.
The cities would have no capital expense, nor would they incur any
personnel costs .
5-
Accessible public transportation is an integral part of any
community. The citizens of North St, Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale are
aware of the opportunities for . involvement in their communities and
are eager to participate in them. For many people, accessible public
transportation makes the difference between community participation
and isolation. The Cities of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale
are no exception. The interest in the survey and public meetings
on the subject of the proposed paratransit project indicates their
interest in their communities and desire to play an active part in
their cities' projects. Therefore, - the Cities of North St. Paul,
Maplewood and Oakdale urgently request your consideration of this
proposal and offer to assist the Regional Transit Board in planning
the proposed paratransit service. The Cities of North St Paul,
Maplewood and Oakdale will, of course, comply with any and all rules
as set forth by the Regional Transit Board and would appreciate any
assistance by the Regional Transit Board.
6-
PROPOSED BUDGET C.Y. 1988
Administrative Charges
Administration
Part -time coordinator,
20 hours /week. @ 16:00 /hour)
Advertising, marketing and promotion
Office Supplies
Other Direct Administrative Charges
Other Indirect Administrative Charges
Mileage @ $.21/mile)
Total Administrative Charges
Personnel Services (not applicable)
Vehicle Charges (not applicable)
Operating Charges
Purchase of Service
Insurance Charges (not applicable)
Taxes and Fees (not applicable)
TOTAL OPERATING CHARGES
16,640* **
3,500*
600*
200
250
21,190
0-
0
128,.000 **
0-
0-
149,190
Charges likely to be higher in first year of operation than in
continuing years.
Charges are negotiable.
7_
A
BUDGET SUMMARY
I. Capital Expense
II. Operational Expense and Deficit
A.. Operational Expense
B. Less Anticipated Revenue
TOTAL OPERATING DEFICIT
III. Funding Provided by Applicant
A. 0% of Capital
B. 40% of Total Operating Cost
IV. Funding Provided by Regional Transit Board
A. 0% of Capital
B. 60% Total Operating Cost
Less Fixed Local Share Amount
TOTAL OPERATING CHARGES
8-
0
14.9,190
28, 000
121,190
0-
59,676
0-
89, 514
149,190
LOCAL SHARE COSTS
Total Local . Share Responsibility -:
under 60/40 plan
Less revenue of fares @ $1.00 /ride, with
estimated 28,000 passenger rides
Less cities contributions, based. on.
population
Popul at ion % of Total
North St. Paul 12 22%
Maplewood 28,775 52
Oakdale 14,168 26
55,153 100%
NOTE: Local tax dollar contribution, based on
population, averages $.57/person annually.
59,676
28.
31,676
6,970
16,471
8,235
0-
9-
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SURVEY RESULTS
March 31, 1987
MAPLEWOOD OAKDALE NORTH ST. PAUL TOTAL .
01. Are you interested in an improved public
transportation system in Maplewood, North
Yes: 207 Yes: 102 Yes 338 Yes: 64 7
St. Paul and Oakdale?
No: 139 No: 30 No: 154 No: 323
373 SURVEYS 132 SURVEYS 493 SURVEYS 998 SURVEYS
2. , How many persons in your household would 1: 91 4: 12 1: 43 4: 5 1: 157 4: 16 1: 291 4: 33usethesystemeitherregularlyor
occasionally?
2: 97 5: 1 2: 49 5: 0 2: 147 5: 5 2: 239 5: 6
t
3: 23 6 +: 3 3: 7 6 +: 1.3: 30 6+: 3 3: 60 6+: 7
3. What would be the age ranges of the
persons inP your household who would
Under 18: 57 Under 18: 30 Under 18: 68 Under 18. 173
be using the system?
19 - 35 yr 73 19 - 35 yr 25 19 - 35 yrs: 117 19 - 35 yrs: 215
36 -64 yrs: 122 36 -64 yrs: 65 36 -64 yrs: 166 36-64 yrs: 35365+ yrs : 69 65+ yrs : 27 65+ yrs : 113 65+ yrs : 209
40 Is there a handicapped person in your
household?Yes: 29 Yes: 9 Yes . 43 Yes: 81
Number: 34 Number: 10 Number: 48 Number: 92No: 222 No: 83 NO: 357 No: 662
5. What type of transportation do you
currently,use?
Own Car: 322 Own Car: 111 Own Car: 963 Own Car. 829MTCBus: 104 MTC Bus: 32 MTC Bus : 121 MTC Bus: 257Taxi: 8 Taxi: 8 Taxi: 16 Taxi: 32Friends/Friends/Friends/Friends/
Relatives: 42 Relatives: 27 Relatives: 84 Relatives 153
6. What is your Zip Code?55119: 51 5511 099 55119. 0 5511 141
55117: 148 55117: 0 55117: 1 55117: 149
55109: 1 .47 55109: 35 55109: 460 55109: 642
55105: 0 55105: 0 55105: 1 55105: 1
55103: 1 55103 0 55103 0 55103: 1
7• What activity reas wouldY you probably
travel to?
1: 190 5: 126 1": 85 5: 50 1: 286 5: 233 1: 561 5: 409 _2: 46 6: 82 2: 42 6: 40 2: 160 6: 149 2: 248 6: 271
3: 80 7: 88 3: 59 7: 81 3: 145 7 123 3: 284 7: 2924: 53 4: 24
1 4: 75 4: 152
8. What would be your main reason for using
the survive?1: 96 3: 186 1: 56 3: 93 1: 176 3: 283 28 : 621: 3 3 52: 34 4: 61 2: 22 4: 42 2: 75 4: 105 2: 131 4: 208
Question 7:
Question 8:
1: Maplewood Mall/ St Johns N E 5:2: North St. Paul Business District
No. St. Paul Target Store 1: Medical /Dental
a
6:
3: Oakdale Nall /K --Mart 7:
Hillcrest Center
Sun Ray Center
2. Visiting Friends
4: Senior Citizens Activities 3: ShShShopping
4: FroToFro Work
A 40APPy people in addition to those above were indirectly favorable to the project.
The figures above and contained in the survey andguaranteed. Community Service Management, Inc.
accompanying reports are believed to be compiled accurately1y but are notassumes
consequential damages. This report is for the sole
no responsibiliy or liability on the subsequent use of the information or any r
use of the Chambers Commerceinternaldecision — making purposes.of of North St. Paul Maplewood andP OakdalE for ;f
i
J ~ TTJ.ww.....w wbr fi.4vdLZ ..H «r...ro4wr... - "n'..:Aw. .. -.. :w -.: ;v; :. .. ..rL""`""'w . 'f.......w....."' j".'.. . w....u«:. :.:f..1 ;:.0 x,...,.'. I -.,.. ,:;:....:(_,.:.1>1- .= ..-..» ..,:..:....:1 _.......:.:.. a _...__... ...... >.._a . -.]. _........ _.. ...... .._a.l - ..... _.. _. _...._..._ _ _ .- _.....r.: -_ ,....._... ._ . ..».. -...> .,.,... ..w........_._,....,.., u, ..._..... _....._._...._- ..,..c.. =.—.. . ...r::..
s
CODES FOR "OTHER" FIELDS
7•
1 DOWNTOWN ST. PAUL AREA 24
2 ROSEDALE 25
3 HAR MAR MALL 26
4 LAKEWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE 27
5 MAPLEWOOD ARCADES 28
6 SAINTS NORTH ROLLER RINK 29
7 MTC BUS LINK 30
8 PLAZA 3000 31
9 GERVAIS LAKE 32
10 LIBRARY 33
11 RESTAURANT AREAS 34
12 CO. RD, E AND WHITE BEAR AVE.35
13 694 36
14 HWY, 120 /DWTN. ST. PAUL 3?
15 DOCTOR ON COPE 38
16 MA PLEWOOD CLINIC 39
17 CHURCH 40
18 AIRPORT 41
19 JOHN GLENN MIDDLE-SCHOOL 42
20 MINNEAPOLIS 43
21 MERIT CHEVROLET 44
22 YWCA 45
23 KNOWLANS 46
1 SCHOOL 15
2 YOUTH RECREATION 16
3 CAR TROUBLE 17
4 EN 18
5 VET SERVICES 19
6 STUDY /RESEARCH /LIBRARY 20
7 CONNECT WITH MTC 21
8 AIRPORT 22
9 BANKING 23
10 LIBRARY 24
11 CHURCH 25
12 AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES 26
13 916 NE METRO TECH 27
1 t f%0 & E So 28
s., f.._r .. 'i '_ _. _.... .._: '.. .. s.. ........,_ _. _.._. .. ... .. ... ..._ ... a.+. -'.. a.......o..•,cf.S.xrr..T..4 r. .x a..'7 , .....<.J, a-1. ,. , - "
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITIES OF NORTH ST. PAUL,
MAPLEWOOD AND OAKDALE
This Agreement made and entered into this day of ,
1987, by and between the Cities of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale,i
municipal corporations in Ramsey and Washi 'p p y g Counties, Minnesota,
al pursuant to the Joint Powers Act, Minn. Stat. Section 471.59.
1. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish an organization which
b _
will study, make recommendations, and, if feasible, operate a transit system
within the three municipal corporations parties to iprppethis Joint Powers Agreement. _
2. The parties hereto shall appoint elected officials to the joint
transit commission, as follows:
Y
a) City of North St. Paul, two members;
b) City of Maplewood, two members;
c) City of Oakdale, two members.
3. Members of the commission shall choose a chairman and a secretary
and shall meet, from time to time, as they deem appropriate. The commission
shall keep minutes and shall periodically provide copies of said minutes
ti to the parties to this Agreement.
4. The-commission shall conduct a study to determine the feasibilityF
of establishing a transit system within the municipal corporations parties
to this Agreement, which system will supplement the existing transit system
1 r
provided by the Metropolitan Transit Commission and Metro Mobility. Said
study, along with the recommendations of the Regional Transit Board, shall
be completed forthwith and shall be filed with the governing bodies of each
of the parties to this Agreement.
S. Upon resolution of each of the governing bodies of the parties to
this Agreement, the commission may be authorized to implement its study
i
and recommendations and do all things necessary to operate a transit system,
including authority to: apply for federal, state and local grants;
i.
t'
r!
s
i
t'.t
C
i'
ii
F
e
t,
o .. w!
To: Cities of North St. Paul, Mapl and Oakdale
From: Judy Hutchinson, Coordinator of Proposed Paratran i 'p s t Prot
Date: April 20 1987
G
Enclosed is a copy of the joint powers agreement between the Cities of
North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale, for the purpose of establishinga "governing body" . to stud and make re
g
Y commendations, and, if feasible,implement a paratransi.t system within the three cities.
The North St, Paul council meeting is later today, and after...the - sign. Y y gn theagreement, it will be passed on to Maplewood and Oakdale, respectively.In the interest of time, a rough draftg copy is enclosed for the CitiesofMaplewoodandOakdaletoreadbefore. the original agreement isdeliveredtothemforsignature,
After all signatures are made on the original 'point powers agreement,appointments of elected officials (2 from each city) to the transit
commission can be made. At that point, the transit commission's six
members will act as representatives from each of the three 'h ee cities andwilldetailtheproposaltobesubmittedtotheRegionalTransitBoard,
Thank you for your assistance in the ro'ect. PleaspJ a cal if you have
questions, 770 -2447 or 777 - 1872, at any time.
JH:sJf
jl
f!
i!x
i'
w _ a+ -.) S' _ "iT r • ..: tF rr... G'l P ^> ^ pr y ..
mot.; ....... ......_. J.'. ..hw: .. .. L x Y a •Ct Yl.+ .5Y .bSc 5
purchase or lease equipment; employ employees; and incur other reasonable
and necessary obligations for the operation of the system.
6. Expenses of the commission, over and above operating receipts and
grant monies, shall be borne by the parties in the same proportion that
each of the parties' population bears to the total population of the parties,
based upon the most recent census data.
7. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year of the commission, it
shall submit its proposed budget for the fiscal year to each of the parties
to this Agreement. The parties shall have 30 days in which to approve or
disapprove the budget. In the event the budget is disapproved within the
30 -day period by any of the.parties to this Agreement, it may not be
implemented by the commission.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be executed by their proper officers.
CITY OF NORTH ST. PAUL
4
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
By
Its Mayor
By _
Its City Manager
CITY OF OAKDALE
r "-
MEMORANDUM Action y Council
c o, x , eico, x r
TO: Acting City Manager Hodd1 f1'e
FROM: Acting City Engineer R o
SUBJECT: water Service District 8 Improvements,
City Project 86 -15 Date
Order Public Hearing
DATE: April 20, 1987
The feasibility study for the water system improvements in the
Mailand- Linwood - Highwood area (water District 8) as well as the
sanitary sewer, storm sewer and street improvements associated with
the construction of Sterling Street from Mailand to Highwood is being
finalized. In order to proceed in a timely manner, a public hearing
should be held at the second meeting of May. Due to the Memorial Day
weekend, this meeting has been rescheduled to May 21. To properly
publish notification of a hearing and mail notices to property owners,the council should order the public hearing at the April 27 meeting,gReview. of the final draft of the feasibility study will be at the may11meetingwithapublichearingonMay21.
It is recommended that the council pass the attached resolution which
orders a public hearing for May .21, 1987 at 7 p.m.
mb
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the cit en for the Cit of Maplewood has been
authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the
improvement of Water Service District No. 8 and Sterlin Street from
Mailand Road to Hi Avenue, Cit Project 86-15, b construction
of trunk water main, water tower, sanitar sewer, storm sewer and
street, and
WHEREAS, the said cit en is preparin the aforesaid report
for the improvement herein described; and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid report will be presented to the council
for review on Ma 11, 19870
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
le The report of the cit en advisin this council that
the proposed improvement on Water Service District No. 8 and Sterlin
Street from Mailand Road to Hi Avenue, Cit Project 86-15, b
construction of trunk water main, water tower, sanitar sewer, storm
sewer and *street shall be presented to this council for review at the
re meetin of Ma 11, 19870
29 The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in *
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited propert
for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement accordin to
M.S.A. Chapter 429,
3* A public hearin will be held in the council chambers of the
cit hall at 1830 East Count Road B on Thursda the 21st da of
Ma 1987, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The cit clerk
shall give mailed and published notice of said hearin and improvement
as re b law,
3'"on by Council,-1
MEMORANDUM !--,'.
n d o r s e
IV.7 o di f i
Re J e ct e
TO: Actin Cit Mana e
FROM: Actin Cit En
SUBJECT: Petition for Public Improvement
Me Street Water Main--Bush to Minnehaha
Cit Project 87-13
A petition has been received from the five residents on the west
side of Me Street between Bush and Minnehaha Avenues for the
installation of a water main. Cit polic has been to re
petitioners to guarantee pa of costs throu the public
hearin with pa to be made onl if the project is not
ordered. It is estimated that this feasibilit report will cost
4,000.00 to prepare. An escrow of $6,000.00 ($4,000.00 x
1500) would be re
It is recommended that the council order the preparation of a
feasibilit stud on the water main contin upon the
petitioners establishin a cash escrow (either letter of credit
or certified check in the amount of $6,000.00 b passin the
attached resolution,
mb
Attachment
ers i,fined,do hereby.petition the Counci 1 of the Ci t of Ma ewood toYP
1
4-.1 UL4r4
and that the said improvement be undertaken by the Village Council in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and that the cost thereof be assessed
against benefitted property as provided by said Chapter 429
OWNER STREET ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FfONT- DATE
it r
E
t .i
r
I a I have witnessed the above signatures, a eme is ewecertifythatgs, nd the proposed m rov n
i i s cus sed with the signers.
FATE) JSPONSORf1 .
Y.
nit
1
00,
oAr
2
76 9 r 7s5 A
7 r) OF / X119 PA
a
w
a
a
1
J
1
I
1
it r
E
t .i
r
I a I have witnessed the above signatures, a eme is ewecertifythatgs, nd the proposed m rov n
i i s cus sed with the signers.
FATE) JSPONSORf1 .
Y.
A '
0.
X8.04
4 00
625.6
d• I r1ao2c33vi $
33t • _ 60 O 66.1
M Z50. _33_ _ _33F+.. Nicjhway E!+•.. Z Z51N, 6ti8.9 _ 14440 ` r ^ C <,rej1 $ Ve Sy C
IC). , 16 SE 's E P4- f -'3'-- - _ ga. 3 - _ - - - - - - -- _ -7 5 7 S. 4 7 .t3J 34 4 ` 3.8S i9 2
5" 0 1 ., 0 , d 135 30 30 ) 100 1 O itg..15 30 t• , 161.434 T TS 5 100j i g S S ,, (s4-) , z) 1 (S Z
i
6
C.E 13e1 <on 0 4._'! 3 = 2 ao s , ) (4j (3)
124 .E r `' N
I too ,a I vu>, • • 6 sr '
s 98.61Jin
SO
rod) o (s) •' 3 ., = i X0`9'
15in \XW
Go 30.6a t' ` per6X43) ( ) R (7) 14
41
3p, ---• --
3qooy - p - 4 s
6 fv5) t : ` _ ` V 1 ? t • b 7 , 3ay3co . s`s) - t
1615.49 _ 4 1 fix)
Ito y
b 9. 4 V 1101r \ ` 3
924s , ,
129B.•F n
r -- S t 2f1d7 ( 13o -,Z a So) • e ,
1
3.as ( j ) ` N r 6 s9) (63) a Z\a 23 / '' opp1
N7 )
4.tt
v
X60) 1 (3 t) 46) 'T l
UPI (7- In
0 '
O 10 O
o (4-7) , 3 y .
30'30 1 1010 (9 — r - / y , yap /
a; cy (
a
Xy,
BUSY, :i •:1
1s.5___ r1l C Z3a .sso 3h (ao) , ) J /
ys 4
31" CO rvb 54 , e, e N .e 7S' t , 5 i 2jS l a 5 C33 moo. a
I l a 6,c7 u• () () ! (`7e ` ,pc s ) C> 19 c, a
2 /Pa 1 4 ,• so
12 t / 7 i I . • 110 S ) >! ) 5
1 f— tl a ? rs X12.4I 4v
3o s 90 b1 4 N N IO . s.• Buda o t2 + )dl i _20 { 1 r 10 6 5 3 2 1 r 9.8 (8t) , ,t_ 6 i[s G 1
0 17
i ! 0 (,)X1.1 / `; • Q j- -
L Z ? '
12 08 _ . 59 11 t t IO 114
o + t ) ( (
j
Y Cs 3) - , _ z ,: m 127• 3 ° 'lac g 9 ( e` / 23) ; r
A:) g 9 Ili
4 c 2i 4 4 I N 1 1 3_r '
1t 2tt - ,t I
r
N _ .. 24)I ? ., , .$ GAG 59 1 - %n2d - ° toIqd. °
n a •'' 9 rI
NkT _ ,r . -) 7)t3 19 21 2 Z 3 2 z ti `°`; , r O 7 J . _ + 8 ILL - - -- -- - ,
159 n
1 3B) 4 ui - lS u t
1 - 1 ! 14 F I clew,
x.83 a i 1t. • 10
1 to C 3 40)
I ` 40
N
to _ ) - I .t
1 DIc
X ) _
o ,
1 ( 3 , 0) (3 i / z 33) 34-1 i ! a /3B 1 r ! 3 90 Oti - T 12 -- - t J
i an + J
16670 ; ,6 ,. .. ti8 - S
ti
ito.% • 3p tq t . 30 30 i2 oa 7t3
t 11.75 n. r .n
r E c i ?_. 3 _ _ - - -- - - _ 1 311 . - - - - -- `-- - 15 1AV ; I 7623.5
12,
t
wry
itTi o N M
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS., a petition has been received to construct a water
main on Me Street between Bush and Minnehaha Avenues, Cit
Project 87-13, and to assess the benefited propert for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA:
1. That the proposed improvement be referred to the cit
en for stud and that he is instructed to report to the
council with all convenie speed advisin the council in a
preliminar wa as to whether the proposed improvement is
feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or
in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated
cost of the improvement as recommended*
2. That this stud shall not be until the petitioner
establishes with the cit a cash escrow in the amount of
6,000,00. This cash escrow shall guarantee the pa of the
feasibilit stud preparation costs with pa to be made onl
if the p ' roject is not ordered and is e to 1500 of the
estimated preparation cost. The cash escrow shall be either a
letter of credit or a certified check,
1— y
MEMORANDUM
TO Actin Cit Mana
FROM: Actin Cit Engineer
SUBJECT: Developer Project Financin and Construction
DATE: April 13, 1987
Iction b Count i 3. lel
Endorsced
Modif-
Re,3
Date.
Th staff over the past three months has been reviewin the ,proceduresforconstructinandfinancinpublicimprovementswithindeveloperprojects. The ori review started with a petition from the
developer of the Budd Kolb Second Addition, Castle Design and
Development Compan Inc., ?% re that the cit install the plat'sinternalutilitiesandstreetsatcitexpenseandassessthecosts
back to the propert over a five- period. The developer proposedtopostaletterofcreditguaranteeingthefirstyear's assessment
pa and a that each lot's assessment would be paid in full
prior to the .lot bein sold or transferred.
A meetin was held on Januar 15, 1987 with the cit council, plannincommissionandhousinandredevelopmentauthoritwherethestaff
presented a proposal that included two options for financin of theinternalimprovementsofdevelopmentplats. ats, Under both options it wasproposedthatthecitendepartmentwouldtakethe
responsibilit for the utilit and -street desi biddin process,hirin of a contractor, construction stakin and construction
inspection as a method of workin toward hi quality improvements.The first financin option proposed as a "pa as you go" approach,where the developer would provide a letter of credit e to 150% oftheprojectcostestimateandthecitwouldinvoicethedevelopermonthlascostswereincurred, The second financin option proposedwassimilartothatproposedbCastleDesiThecitywouldinstalltheimprovementsandassessthecostsbacktothepropertovera
five- period with the developer providin a letter of credit
guaranteein the first year's installment and a to pa eachlot's assessment prior to transferrin the lot.
The finance director indicated a possibilit of a propert taxincreasetocoverbondpashoulddevelopersbecomedelin on
asse payments past the first year's installment. In response tothisconcern, staff indicated a possibilit of a three- assessperiodandthedeveloper's letter of credit bein e to 100% of 'the •
eyntirethreeears' assessment, which would reduce the cit riskfactortonearzero. Input from some members of the council andcommissionsindicatedthatthisriskwasminimalandthatthecitshouldassumesomerisktoachieveahiqualitydevelopment,
The communit development director proposed that with cit f:inancinthedevelopershouldprovideanabove-avera project, as defined bthecitcouncileS'pecific standards would be established such asl5rOOO-s foot avera lot area, more trees planted, dedication ofparkland, etc. Certain members of the council and commission feltthattheminimumrequirementsasestablishedbordinancewere
ade that cit financin was not a
include these specific standards. However,
cit financ'in should be offered onl to
a proven "track record,,
lar enou inducement to
most members f elt that the
established developers with
A -second meetin on this subject was held on'Februar 25, -1987 betweenthestaffand15ofthecitcurrentdevelopers. 'The'devel'operswere.,.unanimouslyopposed -to Option One the " as . -90 financinapproach. The indicated that the possibl slower time schedulei
increased cost and lack of control to sta plattin and const-ructiomadethisoption.totall unworkable. The abilit
n
to proceed privaty elon.a project was extremel important t some - developers,0 of the
especiall the lar firms. The felt that their abilit to make a
0 0project. profitable is tied directl to timin of the project. Thequickin - quick out"approach is necessar to their profit line,Option Two, the cit assessed approach, was acceptable to thedevelopers. The did indicate some reluctance to th 0
e lon time.schedules, however felt that tradin time for the financin approachwasagoodcompromise. Questions, asked about a private approachwithcitassessedfinancinStaffindicatedthat'the le ofassessinwithoutalowbidwasverquestionableandthatifthecit
U
offered the assessed approach, all engineerin and contractadministrationwould-be done under the direction of
I
the cit engineer
Since the Februar 25 developer meetin we have continued to receiveinputfromthedevelopersaswellasmeetinwiththecitattornereleoptionstotheproposedapproaches. The orioptions.as proposed were le acceptable, however, the attorneexpressedproblemswithaswherethecityprequalifiedengineersandprovidedalisttothedevelopersoffirmswhocouldperformengineerinservicesinMaplewood. He felt that with the statelicense (the professional en registration an en must beallowedtoperformprivateserviceswithinthecitandanexclusionbthecitycouldbeconstruedasarestraintoftrade,
Based upon the input from the cit council, • plannin commission,housin and redevelopment authorit and the Maplewood developers, thestaffhasconcludedthatOptionOne, a "pa as you go" approach, or
an modifications thereof, is probabl not feasible for the developersandthuswouldnotbeutilized. The construction quality issueremainsaproblem, but will have to be addressed with additional timean ' d periodic inspection b the cit engineerin department, orthrouofferinofafinancinpacka (Option Two in which the cithascontroloverdesiadministrationandinspection. Two optionsarestillproposedtobeoffered, however, Option One is the currentapproachasallowedbtheplattinordinance. Option Two is the citfinanced, cit constructed approach ori petitioned for bCastleDesiandDevelopment,
The two options, as, proposed, ,and the articular steps that will beinvolvedareasfollows:
2
Option One
This option is the-current approach allowed b the plattin ordinance.'
The ordinance states that followin prelimi plat approval and
prior to final Plat approval the developer must arran for the
installation of all public utilities. The developer must either have
all the streets and utilities installed and -.accept b the: cit
en or must escrow 150% of the construction cost'- ;of the street
and utilities. All costs for en contract
administration, project inspection and cit review and inspection are
borne b the developer.
There are no chan proposed to this approach. The construction and.
en quality problem, where certain developer-hired. consulta nts
are not.producin the same hi quality construction as the cit
en department or cit consultants, will be addressed
with the existin staff dedicatin more review time. and inspec
time to the lower quality work. The resultin increased time will be
billed to the developer in the usual manner, . Conditional occ Y
permits for newl constructed homes will not be granted b the cit
until the concrete curb and gutter and the first la of bituminous
is'installed.
Option Two
This option is similar to that petitioned b Castle Desi and
Development. The particular steps involved in this process are as
follows:
Step 1: Developer submits a preliminar plat with preliminar grading
and utilit plans as well as a le petition re the cit to
install the internal plat improvements.
Step 2 Cit council grants preliminar plat approval with conditions
for final plat approval. One of the conditions would be enterin into
developer's a with suret e to first year's installment of
five- assessment for construction of the internal improvements,
Step 3: Cit en prepares an estimate of the total project cost
25% for indirect costs , the installments of a five- assessment
and the cost to prepare plans and specifications and receive bids.
Step 4: Developer and cit enter developer's a where cit
a to prepare plans and specifications and developer establishes a
cash escrow account with the cit e to 125% of the cost to prepare
plans and specifications,
Step 5: Cit council orders preparation of plans and specifications
b cit engineer land authorizes receipt of bids. Low bid is used to
update total project cost estimate.
Step 6: Developer is - allowed to cancel the project up to this time
with an funds in escrow account bein refunded. Costs incurred to
date would be forfeited,
Note: It should be noted that this process applies only when the lapyplat
requires internal streets and.utilities. The reasoning being that
when a petition is received signed by 100 percent of the landowner s
or in this option, the developer) , the council may , order the
improvement and plans and specifications without a ublic hearip ng.
However, if off=-" improvements are required and consideration is
given to assessing off -site benefited .properties then u onp
prelimi-nary plat approval, the developer's petition would be treated
as :a,-.public improvement petition and in pl.ace the city engineer'sestimateofthetotalprojectcostandannualinstallmentsof
assessment, a feasibility report and public hearing would be
substituted.
Step 7: Developer and city would execute a new developer's agreementpgBementwherethecitywouldagreetoconstructtheproject; assess the cost
over a five -year period and guarantee a date that conditional
occupancy permits would be allowed, while the developer would post appletterofcreditorcashescrowequaltothefirstyear's installmentoftheassessment,
Step 8: Upon receipt of the developer's letter of credit the coststSforpr- eparing the plans and specifications would be charged to theassessableprojectcostsandtheoriginalcashescrowandaccruedinterestwouldberefundedtothedeveloper,
Step 9: City council would hold the assessment hearing and levy the
assessment against the developer's property. Following the hearing,if no appeals are filed, the city ouncil
g
y , at the same meeting, wouldawardaconstructioncontracttothelowestresponsiblebidderand
providing all preliminary plat conditions had been met
final lat. • approve the
p
Step 10: Developer could finalize ro'ect site rou h 'p J g gradingaccordingtotheapprovedgradingplanandbythedateareed upon i nthedeveloper's agreement in Step 7.
g
Step 11: City administers the construction and inspection of thestreetandutilityimprovements,
Step 12: Following placement of the first lift of bituminous or attheguaranteed °date as established in the developer's agreement.'whichever is earlier the c'
g `
city would begin approving conditional
occupancy permits for newly constructed dwellings provided they met''all inspection provisions.
The developer's agreement, in addition
costs if canceled by the developer and
first year's annual installment of the
each lot's assessment would be paid in
tr - ansferred plus would establish a date
would be based upon the following plat
plat approval,
to guaranteeing payment of city
guaranteeing payment the
assessment, would state that
full prior to the lot being
of conditional occcupancy that
size and date of preliminary
4
1. Plat size - -2 - 20 lots; requesting August 1 conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval October 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow)October 15
City receives bids January 15
Developer supplies letter of credit March 1
Assessment hearing March 15
F na1 - -- -Plat - approved - - -- - - - =-M -ate -ch - -1 -5 -
Rough grading complete May 1
Construction start May 15
Conditional occupancy August 1
2. Plat size - -2 - 20 lots; requesting November l.conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval January 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow)January 15
City receives bids April 15
Developer supplies letter of credit June 1
Assessment hearing June 15
Final plat approval June 15
Rough grading complete August 1
Construction start August 15
Conditional occupancy November 1
3. Plat size - -20 - 80 lots; requesting September l conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval September 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow)September 15
City receives bid January 15
Developer supplies letter of credit March 1
Assessment hearing March 15
Final plat approval March 15
Rough grading complete May 1
Construction start May 1.5
Conditional occupancy September 1
40 Plat size - -20 -- 80 lots; requesting November 1 conditional
occupancy:
Preliminary plat approval November 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow)November 15
City receives bid March 15
Developer supplies letter of credit May 1
Assessment hearing May 15
Final plat approval May 15
Rough-grading complete July 1
Construction start July 15
Conditional occupancy November 1
59 Plat size -- greater than 80 lots:
Preliminary plat approval September 1
Developer's agreement (w /escrow)September 15
5
Cit receives Ibid Januar 15
Developer supplies letter of credit March 1
Assessment hearin March'15
Final plat approval March 15
Rou complete Ma 1
Construction start Ma 15
Conditional occupanc .:November 1
6. An preliminar plats-receivin approval after Januar 1 or :final
plats receivin approval after Ma 1 would not receive a guaranteeddateofconditionaloccupancuntilthenextyearbecauseassessments
could not be certified for collection if the hearin were held pastJul
Thi.s option would re the cit t o bond for the project's cost..
The dollar amount of developer construction for 1984, 1985 and 1986has .been estimated with indirect costs of 2.8%, which assumes all
ease are dedicated with the plat, as follows:
1984 Estimated Developer Construction Cost 810,000
En Fiscal and Le 230,000
1984 Total 1
1985 Estimated Developer Construction Cost $1r335
Engineerin Fiscal and Le 375,000
1985 Total $ 1 710 000
1986 Estimated Developer Construction Cost $1 r590,000EngineerinFiscalandLe450,000
1986 Total $2,040,000
Option Two staff comments:
The finance director has responded to the implication ' of this optionasfollows: The proposed cit financin of improvements could
increase the cit bonded indebtedness b 25%. In addi properttaxegwouldincreaseifthespecialassessmentsto.finance theimprovementsarenotpaidwhendue.
Re the increase in cit bonded indebtedness, the 25% was based
upon the assumption that bonds would be sold annuall for developerprojectsetotheaveraamountofthetotaldeveloperconstprojectsfortheyears1984throu1985. This amount
wa .calculated to be $lr600,OOO. If this - amount of five- serialbondaresoldannuallat, the rend of the fifth year the, total amountoutstandinwouldbe $4,80.0,000. The' -followin tableillustratesthis:
Me
As of December 31, 1986, the cit total bonded indebtedness is
19,920,000. The additional $4,800,000 of bonds for developer
projects would increase the cit total bonded indebtedness b about
250. This chan alone would not cause a decrease in the cit
credit ratin with either Standard and Poors or Mood 's Investors
Services* The reason is because the cit total debt now is at a
moderate level and because total debt is one of several factors that
determine our credit ratin However, if other factors chan to
make the cit credit ratin a borderline case, the additional debt
could become a determinin factor.
Re the possible propert tax increase this is based upon the
possi bilit of a developer not pa the annual installment on
special assessments after the first - guarantee. Under current law,
nonhomestead propert has three years to pa taxes and assessments.
If not paid b mid-Au of the fourth year, the propert owner would
lose title to the propert Thus, if a developer does not sell lots in
a new subdivision with cit improvements-, the taxes and
assessments would p robabl become delin Under the proposed
Option Two, the cit could recoup the first year's assessment
installment but would be forced to lev propert taxes to cover the
subse years' installments.
In the finance director's opinion, the bi problem with Option Two
is the possibilit a propert tax increase.to cover delin
developer assessments. To eliminate the risk, the cit could re
a letter of credit to guarantee all five years of special assessment
installments. However, a representative of First Minnesota Sa-vinBankhasindicatedthatitprobablwouldbeimpossiblet,o obtain a
letter of credit for a period greater than three y ears * Therefore,consideration should be given to financin the public imrpovements b
a three-year bond issue with special assessments levied over a
Cor-respondin three- period,
As discussed earlier, the risk factor involved with the scenario the
f.inance director elaborated on is probabl low. Council staff
and developers a that platted propert With improvementsinstalledthatcouldbepurchasedforthepriceofthe final three or
four years of a five- assessment (approximatel 50% to 80% of
project cost)
0*
would be extremel attractive in any market. In
addition, it is anticipated that not all projects b developers will
Bonds Outstandin Developer Projects
000 Omitted)
Year
Bond Issue One Two 'Three Four Five
1 10,600 $1,280 $ 960 640 320
2 1r600 1,28 960 640
3 1,600 1,280 960
4 1,600 1,280
5 1,600
As of December 31, 1986, the cit total bonded indebtedness is
19,920,000. The additional $4,800,000 of bonds for developer
projects would increase the cit total bonded indebtedness b about
250. This chan alone would not cause a decrease in the cit
credit ratin with either Standard and Poors or Mood 's Investors
Services* The reason is because the cit total debt now is at a
moderate level and because total debt is one of several factors that
determine our credit ratin However, if other factors chan to
make the cit credit ratin a borderline case, the additional debt
could become a determinin factor.
Re the possible propert tax increase this is based upon the
possi bilit of a developer not pa the annual installment on
special assessments after the first - guarantee. Under current law,
nonhomestead propert has three years to pa taxes and assessments.
If not paid b mid-Au of the fourth year, the propert owner would
lose title to the propert Thus, if a developer does not sell lots in
a new subdivision with cit improvements-, the taxes and
assessments would p robabl become delin Under the proposed
Option Two, the cit could recoup the first year's assessment
installment but would be forced to lev propert taxes to cover the
subse years' installments.
In the finance director's opinion, the bi problem with Option Two
is the possibilit a propert tax increase.to cover delin
developer assessments. To eliminate the risk, the cit could re
a letter of credit to guarantee all five years of special assessment
installments. However, a representative of First Minnesota Sa-vinBankhasindicatedthatitprobablwouldbeimpossiblet,o obtain a
letter of credit for a period greater than three y ears * Therefore,consideration should be given to financin the public imrpovements b
a three-year bond issue with special assessments levied over a
Cor-respondin three- period,
As discussed earlier, the risk factor involved with the scenario the
f.inance director elaborated on is probabl low. Council staff
and developers a that platted propert With improvementsinstalledthatcouldbepurchasedforthepriceofthefinal three or
four years of a five- assessment (approximatel 50% to 80% of
project cost)
0*
would be extremel attractive in any market. In
addition, it is anticipated that not all projects b developers will
f
use the city financing option thus reducing the -city's projected
bonded indebtedness and allowing the city the flexibility to borrow to
pay bond costs should developer payments become delinquent, with the
costs for borrowing charged back to the property.. A property tax
increase under these circumstances is ver unlikelY Y
Other: Considerations
1. The following survey, conducted in 1985 , shows the approach used
by other cities in the metro area:
Pp
2. The implementation of these options will not require an immediate
increase in city personnel. The increased workload in the e engineeringdepartmentcanbehandledthroughtheuseofconsultants. However, itisanticipatedthatanadditionalengineeringtechnicianwillbe
requested again for the 1988 budget. This position was requested in
1987 to allow the department to apply additional time to noncharg eable
Additional temporary employees to serve as projectYp ect
inspectors may also be requested for the 1988 budget. The additional
technician and. any temporary employees would be 7 usti ied in the
budget - through additional project billings.
3. As an example of the workings of this option, three recent
projects were analyzed as follows:
0
Responsibilit
Hire
C De s _i n Contr .In P F i nanc i n g
Columbia Heights Dev,Dev,CityY ev. Amt. ( LOC )lg ( )Vadnais Heights Dev.or city City City Dev. Bond (150x)
Golden Valley Devor city City City 5-Year Assess. 3
Plymouth Dev.or city Dev.or city City 5 -year Assess.
Shoreview Dev.Dev.Dev,Dev. Amt. Bondg (Bond)Maple.Grove City City City Assess. (LOC) 3
Roseville Dev.or city Dev.or cityY CiY Assess. LOC 3'C )N. St. Paul City City City 5 -year Assess.
Crystal Dev.Dev,Dev,Dev. Agmt. (LOCOakdaleDev.Dev,Dev.10 -Year Assess.White Bear Lake Dev,Dev.Dev,10 -Year Ass 3Asse
Burnsville Dev.Dev.Dev.Dev. Agmt. (Bond)Brooklyn Center Dev,Dev,Dev,Dev. Agmt. (Bond)Fr Cityty City City Assess,
Woodbury City City City 5 -Year Assess.
1 LOC =letter of credit required
2 Design engineer prequalified by city
3 Surety required on assessment
2. The implementation of these options will not require an immediate
increase in city personnel. The increased workload in thee engineeringdepartmentcanbehandledthroughtheuseofconsultants. However, itisanticipatedthatanadditionalengineeringtechnicianwillbe
requested again for the 1988 budget. This position was requested in
1987 to allow the department to apply additional time to noncharg eable
Additional temporary employees to serve as projectYp ect
inspectors may also be requested for the 1988 budget. The additional
technician and. any temporary employees would be 7 usti ied in the
budget - through additional project billings.
3. As an example of the workings of this option, three recent
projects were analyzed as follows:
0
a.Cave's Lakewood Addition--City Project-85-05
Project Construction Cost = $263,500,.00 ( assumed equal if
city had
constructed)
Indirect Costs at 25% - 65 , 87 5.00
Total Project Cost $329,375.00
Given: 34 lots; sold: '15 in 1985., 16 in 1986, 3 in 1987
Constructed in 1985; Assume May 1985 - Assessment interest
rate - 10%
Assessment per lot - $329,375 : 34 = $9,687.50
Five Year Assessment Payment Plan
Yr.Principal Princ.Pymt ` Int.P mt. Paymentr. w
85 329 65,875 $54 $120,771
escrow amt.)'
86 263, 500 65 26 92
87 197 , 625 65 , 875 19 , 763 85 r 63 8
88 131,750 65,875 13 79,
89 65,875 65,875 6,588 72
Actual Payment With Lot Sales
Yr.Principal Lot Sale Prin.P mt. Int.P mt. PaymentA•r rir.rrgr. r.rir irA r..+...
85 329,375 145,313 $36,812 $35,521 $72
86 147,124,000 5,812 2,325 8,137
87 17,438 17 0 0 0
88 0 0 0 0 0
89 0 0 0 0 0
b.Carsgrove Meadows Additions I and II- -City Project 81 -13
Estimated Project Construction Cost = $750,
Indirect @ 25% = 187 200.00
Esimated project cost $937,200.00
Given: 88 lots; sold: 1.0 in 82, 12 in 83, 10 in 84, 10 *in
85, 15 in 86; Construction in 1982; Assume Ma y --1982
Assessment Interest Rate 10 %.
Assessment per lot - $937,200 88 = $10,650
r
Five -Year Assessment Payment Plan
Yr*Principal Prin, Pymt.Int. Py t.Payment
82 937,200 187,440 156,200 343,641
escrow amt.)
83 749,760 187,440 74,976.262,416
84 562 , 320 187,440 56 , 232 243 , 672
85 374,880 187 37,488 224,928
86 187 , 440 187,440 18,744 206,184
Actual Payment With Lot Sales
Yr.Princi al Lot Sale Yrl .Prin. Prin.P mt.Int.P mt. Pa ment
82 937F200 106,500 $830, 7OO 166,140 138 $304
83 664,560 102,240 562,320 140,580 56,232 196,812
84 421,740 63,901 357,840 119,280 35,784 155,064
85 238,560 42,6OO 195,960 97,981 19,596 117,576
86 97,980 31,950 66,O3O 66,030 6 72,633
c.Crestview Third Addition- -City Project 85 -22
Water, Sewer and Street Cost =237,899.20
Indirect @ 25% =59,475.8.0
Estimate Project Cost 297, 375, OO
Given: 39 lots; assumed sales:12 in 86,12 in 87 12 in
88, 3 in 89;Construction in 1986;Assume May 1986 -
Assessment With 10% Interest Rate.
Assessment per lot = $297,375 39 = $7,625
Five -Year Assessment Plan
Yr.Principal Prin. Pmt,Int. P mt.Payment
86 297,375 59,475 49,563 109,038
escrow amt.)
87 237,900 59,475 23,790 83,265
88 178,425 59,475 17,843 77,318
89 118,950 59,475 11,895 71,370
90 59,475 59,475 5,948 65,423
Actual Payment With Lot Sales
Yr.Principal Lot Sale Yrly* mt.Int.P mt. Pa ment
86 297 91 $205,875 41,175 34 313 7 5 488.87 164,700 73,2OO 91,500 22 9,150 32886854,900 13,725 4,575 1,373 5
89 9 9, 150 0 0 0 0.
90 0 0 0 0 0 0
10
le A. three-month review b staff on construction and financin
proceduresocedures on developer projects revealed that a "pa as you go"
was not feasible for the developers due to hi costs from,
C . .city -restrictions and time dela within the cit administra-tion of
pro
20 The developers, especiall the lar firms, indicated that
private construction is extremel important to their-business approachandremovinthatoptionwouldforcethemtoreview .their'develo p mentinMaplewood,
3* Option One is the current approach (privatel administered
allowed b the plattin ordinance with no revisions. Under the
ordinance the developer must either have all the streets and utilities
installed and accepted b the cit en or must escrow 1500 of the
construction cost of the street and utilities to guarantee the
construction,
4e option Two-is a twelve-step approach in which the cit preparestheplansandspecifications, administers and inspects the pro and
assess . es the project costs a the property over five years,
5e Option Two re a set timetable dependent*upon the size of
the plat. The conditional occupanc permit date will be guaranteed to
be issued b the cit if the developer meets all conditions.
The finance director indicated that the increase in the cittotalbondindebtednessifallprojectswerebondedforwouldnot
cause a decrease in the cit credit ratin because total debt is one
of several factors that determine our credit ratin 0
7. The possibilit of a propert tax increase to cover bond pashoulddevelopersbecomedelinonassessmentpapastthefirstyear 's guaranteed installment is considered minimal due to the
saleabilit of a platted subdivision with all improvements installed
and at least 20% of the cost paid,
8* A 1985 surve of fifteen suburban communities showed that ninehaveproceduresforassessindeveloperprojectimprovementsbacktothepropert
90 - An increase in cit personnel is not re to implement the
proposed chan The increased workload could be handled throu theuseofconsultants,
Recommendations
1.. The current approach,to'developer project- construction and
finandin a private basis should be retained.
20 A second option to the private construction and financin shouldbeofferedasamethodofaddressinqualityproblemsindeveloperfinancedimprovements. This second option should be a citadministered, cit approach,
11
3. , The city -- administered approach should include city responsibilitylitYPYforplanandspecificationpreparation, receipt of bids, levy of
assessment, construction administration and construction inspection.
4 . 0. The options should be administered and timetables adhered to -asas
outlined in this report.
5 . I f the council agrees with th-is .change in of is Y , the staf fP
should be directed to draft a revision to the platting ordinance and
begin procedures f or adopting the revised ordinance.
7C
cc: Acting City Manager
Finance Director
Director of Community Development
Director of Parks
City Clerk
Engineering Techs
Associate Planners
Developers_
12
1 - S_
a MEMORANDUM
T0: Acting City Manager_
FROM Finance Director
RE: 1986 Annual Financial Report and Audit
DATE: April 21, 1987
d d
lJo iff e
eiecte,
t
Recently the City's 1986 Annual Fi nanci a.l Report and audit were completed.
Three documents have been prepared:
1) General Purpose Financi Report - .:contains data extracted
from the Comprehens*i ve Annual Financial Report and provides
a concise summary of the City's financial condition. Copies
of this report have. been distributed to the City's advi
boards and . commi ssions . Also, a limited supply will be
avai to the public.
2) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report - contai detailed
financial and statistical information to provide complete
information o.n all financial transactions during the yeas.
Copies of this report have been distributed to the Counci
State Auditor, Moody' Investors Serv Standard and - Poors ,
bond investors and the Maplewood Library.
3) Management Letter - contains the audi comments and
recommendations regarding financial. management. Copies of
this letter have. been to the Council and-Finance
staff,
It is recommended that the Council schedule a meeting with the auditors to
discuss. these reports. Last year a special meeti ng was held to allow more
time for discussion and review of the reports,
DFF : I nb .
i
Act on b Co
MEMORANDUM Endos sd
Modif
To: Ken Haider, Acting City Manager Re iFrom: Robert D. odegard, Director of Park & Recreation
Subj Council Approval To Hire A Permanent Part -Time .Clerk - Typist Date.
For The Nature Center
Date; April 15 1987
We have received a resignation from Barb Flick, our permanent part -time clerk-
typist at the Nature Center, that effective May 15, 1987, she will be resigning
and leaving the State of Minnesota. She has done an excellent job as a clerk-
typi and has relieved the naturalists from many of the office r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s .
Request
It is requested that the City Council permit the posting of the Clerk - Typist I
position for the Nature Center and approve the hiring of a new permanent part -
time Clerk- Typist.
V/Ccs City Clerk
S'
7
r ,
MEMORANDUM
ACtion by .,
s,
U
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Public Works Director
SUBJECT: No Parking -- Castle Avenue
DATE: April 20, 1987
In the last couple.of years parking along Castle Avenue by the nursing home
has become more extensive. The street is narrow and of particular concern
is the lack of sight distance around the curve. Several citizen complaints
about parking situation have been received by the city.
It is recommended that a no parking zone be established on the south side of
Castle Avenue in the vicinity of the curve.
jc
TF11P't •7 u
1.
e r ,
p Y ! iy •rs ,r b 3' . • ri 1 .7Str ) Fr' t
f. r... , , r r . rY4 t r
t ,.
4 r. 57 ''•
4, ,. Y: .:y. '' J1r I Jy.a !' •' t' li ..0 `t. h '
t ,i 1 xf.L.
s AYt• r,
r
i1iS •• I !'f}
r.
J
t ' - i ;f: 1, : -r t .t. .t `E,i r 1 ,, Z ".' ,' 1 rt tt!'t.'1' , 4 1 .Qi a4iyy i,,
t 'Y a. '` 71• r.f .x 1tt ,
Za
htcf) f sr• Ir
hh `
rf• r7Arir.J'r1 • f. ,Y • (
y
r :ti1ri:a A 7l • > R 't Pi AG r f fi
1 f h'pf t
i
4 7 rJ't 1• • `v1 {t 1 7 rr 71' y1fA r y1x <'TA •' 1 • nnr1:w rt Jt tiifs !, ,i t .I w . °11r1 '. YF
tlY41T
t
I ,
r. - 5t :i• . , r
r -',,i •7':. ,a.,,, ',73 :. ?' .,., : ( • r, ',J ? ,••,< 1 fa' + 1.
ri,a iL.ti1
a t,• F 'M ,•tt y
r trabr itt
j
t r yP4rGsk .i t r •Y.. fr ay
r
t ,i•r'1, r r1.ll ,rJ:r p(f 4 `= r'1R „r,a .1t
a 1 .x 1
w•' Y y I •' J , r: 1 aG. = ra
yp '
4'- 1 -jrF '' y t ' •tilt •e
A,. rt .,. } aka r1 r, r j i
1 ' I :• t.,,h
Y I Fryy iS4Far
t11t
r t t.bA Irtr.Yk: 1I rStti
r
t
4'rh`c..'3'v (f ..-: ,. ,. } Xt,:., t . t'i t. : - >:,r '>: y, ;•- i ,. i. , i t ''.. •R r .x. '{'
y. , '.! f f ,, # Y a :sP.'I a ' / .. per• i ,ptin ' 4 t. '- ' . ; . :; ',., .:n, • -' F r F, t ,: { f *i t bf. , i. e2
f i . .l,G,q,. H3 t L !t' {-. rt < ;k- . : .f, f .a, '' ,i. 4 "
I {, .y "F_ - Icy •' :(
k,{a' .yL- "1, .y i .I; vr4 ,. J ,,<1•. t.. • t' r
1 '
f':
FfA+a ':fit ' :v •'!d'' •,• -. ' ) 7 +t!- t ,Ts Fi'r ''l+ •" •1 .
u ,' r s : "' 'i' r '! w:. ;4 Sf y , G 1 b ! .
a 4 7 .. 7it'•h1 t ..i I ,
u ;' S tr : ta7T .,p ! al e•'fit.
y' :. • .
r
Ile {r «^ : ,f
v t 'allittr' •a. 'Y •? ;- !
i ' } t •sA' e: a7'' t' ft'
k V4fY r frI ?t-
4 h , .t• '
1 1 7. y :+ 1. .,tl t. .. t i • Y , 1
y r1 ,ww
1
1 •,
e. :G YI:f I`• uw «
ZA
Of
n .r
3'. - j v:8ar ,Yr '1R: • ,' i I ,/ _ 1: ' i r, . .. h, '. }' :I e. r 1 ly. ;! J ,.
in M
R ,t n r 'R•d , I'. t•r:i tlwf4'
4 :
t• • r 7 '
1 r n 2' +Iy4dJ •, .i ea •f'
r ?p r ' , r r F .y • ' a _ 1 r {.r 4: '.<r` r : f , i
i t 1,1
a
r. •;t • i. ! ' 1 ' ,1.,, i - f: yyl ,; 't. rY r'I' '' .1 1;. J .^ ,', ? i :7' `t ) •. 1I• >1 t
w ° 'fir J • Y: i - ,,t4
y. f r {' /.' ae ". ?' 4. t,'}i •-.f.1t' 1P 14. '• . • 1.,4 "a. Y '2 - f,: Y 1+ 1 J '+1iF; :' i 'Y. . M1 :at r '! r. • ' ' ' , .,i..0 r t , 7
les ;V '. !1" .x ` J,r '1 1Ji1 `,', .xy a:! •,.• i,' ryy ,(.
1 : t .lW' ' `j I ,, { nL'' :,. }.. ri T! 't'F t ,. y
P I 1I
1
iK
5I }
e "• j 7 F
i' • J I V]' , 4' t , 'r 1
t
r. .
y f M •11' •S
4G6. n• 1. '•1j- ! ;! 1, ,j•.
IN
t'i y r' .Jr• "
r 4
fi a_ 7•
r
f i ,1iFS•r e
1 R`af9 r 1 71.
L.
s R• • ' • I .4 ifRf Sr •r rrfF• i y1 -'
y
r
1, i4 tit t{1 15^ K i 1t.•f )l)y1 4r:Njj .
1A' /
f
a
1 t"ttit^ t 'ta. u'yG.w
I 1'J 1'f ,q7J ,r. Ry
t rr
I
Ld(
tr ,7
w ny
a :;: '• •'° ,'' fi
y .I ab a$1 :Y'r re7 tY.11d r:rk. .'LY
r
k
q
XE 1 i rii4H..ti Y• I •J- tV \• ( , t,t tirt } fl •.b-rt wrrr•A 1• /t q r1 f
t ,
dl° it . •„ Y . ` : '+.r, r. i. i ' 1a jR ,'a •.r ' ,. i. fi •t
1 1 3 JIM }r 1 ii• rrirw4Isrr t
i
4'
lr+ 1 t t1ft,1 a
t,rY: rA• I F F fr•rf i :f ,•.K f.'Ir t.p I 1f1Y , a" •M J . . tb3 CIEqrd,LAi
wM t f1 (
f'f LFi. D .! rt • <1 Vi y1S-t Y7I ,M
s4r kVr
Jtx ; tt{ }ytiF '1 I' '1 tk itr
a
i i '•r' w.4 5 1 7itiM' '4y
H
yy
itt J
r r •
j itSt
i TIa'E'i l1'Y1 =1' 14 ' t7 ti.Y Tr I ' x NY, F
FF
t *1 9rY . i ,.tx Ir.i; {. x
i
r i , kg
Nt'I k1 • i.r 'tv' 2iirrrI M :
a
y7r
4 1Gt'k ,r
d
i _, it' •JY
r
fi` r vt.' -ei l ' NI elt.• •,.Y-. ,r'Y,''• a ':.,' , #, . :,
rt.
r: `iiS+' : -<' r,' .:,, a ..., I «• . } 1,. A` .,. %_:r
r
t. -'!' •, .. y ''a' Sir 'v
1 . G: ' " /:. .' !• F ' y , iy' tb.. (r 'L'! .0 t .ter .i
t
f :•7
Y I I % r r {!r•1 f
h y 1
41 F '.r 9'Iw"it • It - ,', ..r •.r: i
o t. •. ,Y •t
y :t
TU
N ,rt``('
I J 69 e.r'S s t:1 t s f NtrrH.ry 3.J. , i ,,, n 1.' , L. r. ft
f a1Lr I 'i• , Yi! 4"! I '•i - . l ., L.. ,:le r 7• i. 1 • r ''P' ., .a 1
t t i A
5 I t dnl• f
99 , : ' 1, . ' e', tt .k ; . •:+ y °1'1t't +: i F y. ' 71t . ^ i t r :' J !
1 '.,i. .V}' ,t.. »,. .: t1,. F h T y 'Fttr h - ,i" 7r f '1. y ril . '. !' '. ` ry- , • . {. 1
Sy '. , 'j( - .` . ,' F+ ,. :,t.. > •y -r r .. RJ•,, i,. ,' Ir. . ° Ay. `' 1l; 1'} 'i .y ,
f
r+'f. t
L ,i t . ^ -s, .•d' , .I Si.. 's.. ', . +: ''kl• ` '; ' +
11
r, r - ::
G Z:, i ' :t y } '• fff. ' .4 :,: ik •/r { i^t, ', - r Y , ,' ,'•
i r 4t ''1
7r 1: y J, a Gi' •1e :Q` r '7_..aJ • ^:f " a .111 :,, If .t +.
ti arR•r tYr.
fie ,{ :,n Tl ".+ '' P , +',
tfr • l " .p V' i5 IV ' ,} jj*iy/_•K i '` l
y -' -
Y.-
Y{y,. 'ry • .,H7 rY ^ /.
h .
ff •L.1 ' .1: _ t - j: '
1 t
r
tF ' ,. .1 '; ?( ;., :. r • 'i. •t r jf i. ; ` "r 'r. c' T,'.t .; . 4., , , ' ,, t.dY t,
X. '1 .:. i • ..
a Ya >:' : a< t 't It
Yr' 1o2.r: ,F, ' 'C , , : i'•tt IY'. +} !t' ''. t Y e. ,d ! ..t. r _ }r.! !/ ti
r<r. i !! 'oF 'i A i' Yk 'I t.d l .1. f„ ,1 f •ar1 )r 7 .f'r'
k y - 7J,1. . {' j 1 ) 1t1,.J r• ' •• • ':t r!f L•
i ' fr•'' f rf7'.1
hrt ,. 7•t . .ti,.t •EIf•FI' f1'•IA1J1JtN•n a Yv7-y l rhr o .`Y , ri 'Y' {' i,' •' #'r i 1 '.,," .il 1 rl /
a • ti' Y.. v 'T', •.tr ' ,i'
f { t• f .ftR •:'V #A n J , fr + ? Yfi it •di', {• /may /.,
s i;
tcr.t,rX • Ns•
1,f w.
a 1 J
t '
st• r R 1Sj
4'
a
Rf" ) 1 y tl • M1
5 ry
4 a'w .t' Y ! `
j :b s > • K. R. ``fitI'-
r L' . S r ' •G •+
s t • 1I'fit?• : •<a , c t. 1 k r. i.J4 I
c J f.4 f Y r.,y ;l.iI 71 `F I •-,1 tt AiI >fe 'ir'R. n
uY
J 1 fj
a , 'e T r ! r i , Ir •
Y 4 „r
f
4. NMI !, F
1 ' ' ^ , h '
F jt' } t 7•li: .R' , t 5
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: Budget Transfer -- Educational Incentive Pay
DATE: April 21, 1987
Action by Council:i
Endorsed
Modifi.e
Rejected
Date
Five police officers became eligible for educational incentive pay under their
contract within the last few years. These employees, however, did not request
the. additional pay until some period of time after they became eligible. The
contract implies payment will commence when an employee is eligible.
The city has calculated the cost including retirement and insurance to be
8,400.006
It is recommended that $8,400.00 be transferred from the General Fund
Contingency Account to the appropriate. personnel account to fund this item.
mb