Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988 07-11 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M,, Monday, July 11, 1988 Maplewood Administration. Building Meeting 88 -1.5 A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA �E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. 1988 Labor Settlement 3. Time Extension: Cave's Currie Street Addition 4, Final Plat: Maplewood Meadows (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1, 7 :00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Renewal and Revision: (Skon) 2. 7 :10 P.M., Code Variations: South of Fish Creek a, On -Site Sewage Systems b, Gravel Shoulders C, 24- foot -wide Streets 3. 7 :20 P.M,, Variance: 1281 Kohlman (Kruse) (G) AWARD OF BIDS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. 2280 Stillwater Avenue (Lincoln Park Seniors) a. Variance - 4 Stories b. Variance - Area /Unit C, Reduced Parking J d, Conditional Use Permit - 4 Stories 2, Code Amendment: Shoreland Overlay District - 2nd Reading (4 Votes) 1201 Frost Avenue 3, C.D.R,B. Appeal: Finamart (County Road B & White Bear) 4. Dege Garden Center (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. "Garbage" Houses 2. Cottages of Maplewood 3. Appointment To East Community Family Center 4. McKnight Road Phase 2, Project 87 -04 - Schedule Public Hearin g 5. Ferndale Street Storm Sewer, Project 87 -20 - Approve Plans 6. Sterling Street Water Main, Project 87 -45 - Approve Plans 7. McKnight Road Phase 3, Project 87 -05 - Approve Plans ; .8. Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (4 Votes) (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7, 8. 9. 10. 11. 12, (L) ADMINTSTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT A Number � '"' AGENDA REPORT r . arai TQ: Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director RE* Approval of Claims DATE: Jul 6, 1988 Action b Couno 9 Endorsed — Modified Rejected_ Date It is recommended that the Council approve pa of the followin claims: Accounts Pavable: $4139571*11 Check #2474 - 2499 and # 7801 - 7865 Dated 6/14/88 - 6/30/88 2109,248.39 Check #3368 - 3522 Dated 7/11/88 $6235819950 Total Attached is a detailed listin of these claims. DFF/ch 8 8 ..... . MN REC. & PARK ASSOCIATION 6 GIRLS SOFTBALL REGISTRATIONS 130.00 BOYS SOFTBALL REGISTRATIONS --VGU CKRE-G- 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 575.00 �`' PAGE 1 05/88 10:07 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER UPDATES FOR CHEM.IDS 20.00 20.00 60 "u 7814 530500 06/22/88 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR PERIOD 06 574T 4607-0-6722 N S T ATE R - E A S U RE R.- DR #149 VOUCHER/ , 743 . 14 -____ - - -- � JJ tA CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK Ill-50 111.50 NAME DE,3CRIPT ION -- A M 0 U N T AMOUNT 24►8 140900 06/20/88 COLLINS KENNETH TR. REWARD MONEY 200.00 200.00 - ------------- w 0* 2499 541400 06/20/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DR #149 5 5 TREASURER DL #849 533.00 533 7802 710525 06/21/88 SCNITTEN FIREWORKS . . . ........ JULY 4TH CELEBRATION FIREWORKS 1 ...... 1 7803 541400 06/21/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DL #849 451.00 DL #849 451.00- DL #84.9 415.00 415.00 7804 541400 06/21/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DR# 149 5 5 li� 1: 7806 101925 06/21/88 BUTTERWORTH LEGAL PUBLICATIONS BOOK 45.00 45.00 TOM'' EES) 988.00 988.00 1' 00 06T217T8-8--H`O-RW-ATH 7808 722200 06/22/88 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE P/R DEDUCTION 63.00 63.00 7809 460475 06/22/88 LEARNING RESOURCES COMPANY WORD PERFECT TRG 47.50 3, WORD PERFECT TRG 47.50 95.00 7810 141300 06/22/88 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE STREET FLUSHER 52.35 FORD LN8000 DUMP 17.78 #:: FORD L N80 0 0 DU MP' 8. .. 44 STEAM CLEANER 6.26 FORD LN8000 DUMP 3Z.79 FORD LN8000 DUMP 7.15 SEWER CLEANER 12.08 ss FORD LN8000 DUMP 8.19 4u 41 FORD LN8000 DUMP 4.00 156.60 8 8 ..... . MN REC. & PARK ASSOCIATION 6 GIRLS SOFTBALL REGISTRATIONS 130.00 BOYS SOFTBALL REGISTRATIONS 65.00 195.00 7 1 CAT I NG COSTS 575.00 575.00 �`' 7813 042350 06/22/88 ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RRS UPDATES FOR CHEM.IDS 20.00 20.00 60 "u 7814 530500 06/22/88 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN MAINTENANCE COSTS 282.00 282.00 574T 4607-0-6722 N S T ATE R - E A S U RE R.- DR #149 6 , 743 . 14 -____ - - -- � JJ tA 7816 541400 06/Z2/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DL#849 501.00 501.00 ko 7817 140400 06/23/88 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT COUNTY FILING FEES Ill-50 111.50 POSTMASTER REUNBURSE POSTAGE 39000.0-0 I Vi�UGHf G CITY OF . M APL.EWOOD 07/05 10:07 VOUCHER /CHECK: REGISTER I- FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM _ NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME _ DESCRIP'TION 7819 541400 06/23 MINN. STATE TREASURER DR #149 7820 541400 06/23/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DL #84a► DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES REFUND f ; I I 782 630900 06/24/8 NATIONAL YOUTH SPORTS CO ACHES COACHES CERTIFICATION !I ,J 7823 8 10925 06/24/88 PETER SIMONS REFUND BLDG PERMIT ` REFUND BLDG PERM 7824 144700 06/24/88 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR. LICENSE REC #5498 _T82 5"� 2 --- 7 6 - 7 - CT - $ - S - `"' P'l: O YE E ._.. E N E F _ __.. R . L . A N y ..__ ...._ _ _. PAYMENT - .. r 782 63 06/ 24/88 N.S.P. ELECTRIC P M T ELECTRIC PMT k `! ELECTRIC BILL GAS BILLING t ! ELECTRIC BILL ' ELECTRIC REACTIVE USE --- - - - -- MPING ('I ELEC. MUNICIPAL CTR PUMP ; ELEC . M U N I C I P A L CTR PUMP I: 541400 06/24/8$ MILAN. STATE TREASURER DL #349 i 782 541400 06/24/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DR #149 7829 722200 06/24/88 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE P/R DEDUCTION 6!10!88 P/R DEDUCTION 6/10/88 iu 7830 520480 06/27/88 MC:DONALDS r I Fu�D PMT 7/88 MAPLEWOOD STATE LANK P/R DEDUCTION l: ' P/R DEDUCTION P/R DEDUCTION %ol i, 7332 340125 06/27/88 RONALD HELEY S SAFTEY SHOES -Au 7833 030400 0627/88 - ANDERSON CAROLE U PETTY CASH REI NBURSEME'NT ' PETTY CASH REINBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REINBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT <<s PETTY CASH REI NBURS EMENT PETTY CASH REINBLIRSEMENT PETTY CASH REINBUR ;EMENT PETTY URSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PAGE 2 _.._. _ ITEM CHECK AMOUNT AMOUNT _ .. 6 6, 439 .50 i 317.00 317.00 58.00 58.00 735.00 785.00 54.00 1.50 55.50 357.00 3 57.00 1 1 90.94 137.86 , 88.47 83.37 5.95 665.71 210.29 [ N G 163.0 ING .97 1 636.50 636.50 ; 4 I 4 8,537.06 11 19 32.30 32.30 �. t" 6, 495.83 17,087.27 �. 6 .83 _ ._... 304078.93 20.00 20.00 7.80 1.05 1.10 I 2.50 1.25 4.00 r, 3.69 t 4.00 4.00 Z.75 32.14 i� ' VO CITY O F M A P L. E W O O D _ .._.. __ -,. _._......._ - _._ ___ .. __._..w. _... _.__..._. _.�, . __._._. _ .�.- .... __ - -- 07/05!88 10:07 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER PAGE FOR PERIOD 06 a VOUCHER/ CHECK _____..__ VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM N UM PER NUh��EFt ._._._._.DATE __ NAME . _ _ - . _ __ . DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 7 54 06/27/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DL #849 499 .50 499.50 7836 560250 06/27/88 MN STATE COMMISSIONER P/R DEDUCTION 5 8 _7z 7 18 S___ 1� - 7 LA N E S �ifi A D E N E F I `fi ASSOCIATION p% F� D E but T I C� hl 510 ,__..._ / I .5._ ~. 10 . 50 -; 7 838 9 45500 06/27/88 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE P/R DEDUCTION 148.64 148.64 7539 510900 06/27/88 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK; P/R DEDUCTION 287 ( ■50 287.50 DR #149 5, X45 25 -- .._. . 59245.25 7 841 8 40700 06/27/88 ST. PAUL /MAPLEWOOD - .RECEIVED C 10U� RE C# F '�' 6 7842 520480 06/28/88 MCDONALDS PMT LINDA AS NEEDED 32 F" ■30 32 ■3 0 78 4 7 3 ---1 520480 TrTCDOfYALDS- _ _- � ��;�..._,�� PAY A83 NEEDED 32 32.110 : -i 7844 9 1015 0 0 VALLEYFAIR .. .......... .... VALLEYFAIR TICKETS 1,04 .00 'i 7045 541400 06/28/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DR X149 8 8 M "NN . STATE T R E S U R E R D 8 4 b 4 1 4_0 0 �T67ZE 7 486.50 486.50 7847 530 500 0 6/29/88 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN MAY 198: . � I LESS 1 Cj "l. .. _. _... - . � .. _ �53.00- 25 7848 5 414 04 06/29 MINN. STATE TREASURER WASTEWATER OPERATOR CERT 15. 15.4 7849 551500 06/29/88 MN POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT REVIEW FEE 140.00 140.00 .' OF HEALTH .__._ F'rF(M I T REVIEW FEE 150.00 150.00 7851 540800 06/29/88 MINN. DEPT OF HEALTH PERMIT REVIEW FEE 150.00 150.00 7852 541400 06/29/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DR #149 8 8,778.72 T R E A S U R E k DL 0 - 499.00 499.00 -� 7854 140400 06/30/88 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT COUNTY FILING FEE REC .5576 _.. 110.50 110 7855 540875 06/30/88 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFTEY CHGS FOR i PHONE DROP MINI COMPUTER ADDITIONAL. �• 150.00 ._..._.__ _...._..�__ ... . WORKS 390.00 540.00 7856 700500 06/30/88 P.C. SOLUTIONS SOLUTION XT TURBO 20 SYSTEM 19121.00 SO LUTION XT TURBO 20 SYSTEM PC 1 2 130 , 00 7857 542200 06/30/88 MINNESOTA TWINS 47 TICKETS @7 EA332 �: 3 2 � . .00 .- � 3 32.00 7858 551 700 � r „ -, .16/ jtj /a�a MN F{E:G■ & PARK ASSOCIATION TOURNAMENT ENTRY FEES 2 , 200. 21 200.00 0 CITY _..,..__..... OF MAPLEWOOD �.. �;, PAGE 4 a ' V�]UCHREG 07/05/88 10:07 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER . FOR PERIOD 06 D _ _._.._ ... _..... _..._. _.._..... _ . _ .M..... . ___ __ _._.... _ . _....__ ' jo VOUCHER/ . CHECK VENDOR C K CHECK E VENDOR E ITEM I ITEM _.. _ ...._.._... CHECK _._ _ .- -- ___.. - --- - - -.__ NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7859 940550 06/80/88 WEHRMAN SERGLY AS INC SHERWOOD _._. 1,271.00 G ER AN r U M 1 HAZELWOOD 29 982.60 PLAYCREST 2 8'77 .60 8 9 251.20 7860 541 175 06/30/88 MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION TOURNY ENTRY FEES 225.00 225.00 -. 7T&T 5 / �.G h�hl_: Tf�EASUREa DR1 9, 225 .70 99225.70 1.. �. 7862 54 1400 0 6/80/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER DL #8 282.00 _._ 2$2 ".44- _»___.___.____ 5 7868 280500 06/30/88 EAST COUNTY LINE FIRE DEPT. CONTRACT PAYMENT 5 j CONTRACT PAYMENT 58, 157.50 63 4'97.50 7864 320600 06/30/88 GLADSTONE FIRE DEPT. CONTRACT PAYMENT 6 CONTRACT PAYMENT 66, 875.00 72 7865 701100 06/80/88 PARKSIDE FIRE DEPT. CONTRACT FEES 5 CONTRACT FEES 43,302.50 __. _ _ .... 48 642 . TOTAL CHECKS ___36$,_10 .20 , o t it f. �r ~4 sa i; vou~*nsu - ozry OF mxpLEwoon PAGE / 06/30/88 14v12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR psnzoo 06 2476 541*00 06/14/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER 2477 541400 06/14/88 MINN. STATE rnEAounsn STATE nmzvsno LIo FEES PAYABLE m*o.00 560 .00 MOTOR ' m�� v�� �zc ���o p�vmmus xo,�*o.mn �o,z*o.�o ] - [ 4N 'l / 2479 oao*uo 06/15/e8 xwmsnoow cmmuLE 2480 843200 06/15/88 STEFFEN SCOTT ~ I TEM TRAVEL & TRAINING 7.25 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR NN ITEM CHECK 35.00 WN NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT TRAVEL u TnAzmIwa 2474 803431 06/14/88 NOWICKI DONALD S. A/R A #803431 43.50 43850 ---o-UPPuES-- =JAN.ITOR--IAL_ ouppLzEa - oFrzcs '.-_ 2.73 pnoanAm ouppLzsa � NN � __-_---'--------pnuaoAm-Suep-LzEo----'- ' -- .--u���S.URANCEeAYAL-LE'-------su��--------------L @0 urzLzrIEa ' - --------^*. pnoanxm ouppLzso 35,00 urzLzrzEa � nomA nEnuoTzom PAY N0 / pnoanAm ouppLzEo 35.00 105.00 HEALTH LIFE oswrAL zmou*xmcE - - - -urz.LzTzEs '--------- -- --------�,���. - . urz�zrz�s e�� .22 2476 541*00 06/14/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER 2477 541400 06/14/88 MINN. STATE rnEAounsn STATE nmzvsno LIo FEES PAYABLE m*o.00 560 .00 MOTOR ' m�� v�� �zc ���o p�vmmus xo,�*o.mn �o,z*o.�o ] - [ 4N 'l / 2479 oao*uo 06/15/e8 xwmsnoow cmmuLE 2480 843200 06/15/88 STEFFEN SCOTT ~ |JwN . � TRAVEL & TRAINING 7.25 NN T _ _ TRA ____ 35.00 00 ouPpLzEa oppIcs 9. 9 7 2483 630050 06/15/88 N.S.P. - ' --' ' ^~~ 531.91 TRAVEL u TnAzmIwa _.- NN oupPLzEo - oFpzos NU -uTzLz-T zsa ---o-UPPuES-- =JAN.ITOR--IAL_ ouppLzEa - oFrzcs '.-_ 2.73 pnoanAm ouppLzsa ' � __-_---'--------pnuaoAm-Suep-LzEo----'- ' -- @0 urzLzrIEa ' - --------^*. pnoanxm ouppLzso 35,00 urzLzrzEa � '_PROCIRAW -o���� ........... _'—_--- N0 / pnoanAm ouppLzEo 35.00 105.00 |JwN . NN 2482 081150 06/15/88 JOHN BOHL PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.00 35.00 2483 630050 06/15/88 N.S.P. - ' --' ' ^~~ 531.91 uTzLz7zEa NU -uTzLz-T zsa urzLzTzEo 2.73 ' uTzLzTzEa z. @0 urzLzrIEa ' - --------^*. ' urzLzrzEa 2.73 N0 urzLIrzEo 10. - - - -urz.LzTzEs '--------- -- --------�,���. - . urz�zrz�s e�� .22 ^ �� UTILITIES mZ. ~ -- - ---- - urzLzrI E�'- ---- ------- -----------� x�2. ~ ~ urILzrzEa urzLzrzsa 85 +o^~- «� `' UTILITIES - ------ - -----------'��. ` urz�zrz�o � �/ ^ x� pon , ~^ V� ~ , - o4/1o/aa MINN. STATE TREASURER 'moTon vcW Lzc Fsso pAvmaLE 4 ----------�,���.m�-`-----� � - 1 4 I ji� I VOOCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 06/30/88 14:1'7 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER-/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 00 NU NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 2485 541400 06/15/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 507.50 507.50 _2436*1 - 140400 061-16/88 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 1`9.00 129.00 Z487 541400 06/16/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYAI-:'.L.E 5 5 2488 541400 06/16/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 435.50 4%3 5 . 50 a3jaiMO .0-6116/8-8 ANDERSON CRAIG FEES FOR SERVICE 250.00 250.00 2490 401750 06/16/88 JOHNSON TOM FEES FOR SERVICE 250.00 250.00 2491 2:50175 06/16/88 ENGSTROM RICHARD FEES FOR SERVICE 250.00 250.00 ___06-11-6/88 -HAFNER'S. RESTAURANT TRAVEL TRAINING 38,95 4 9 3 741500 06/17/88 RAMSEY COUNTY PARR REC FEES FOR SERVICE 145.00 145.00 2494 144700 06/17/88 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 199.00 199.00 -Z4L9_a_ �•-4_Clal3b _____04 x.1--7..1. 8 8 -N.ELSON--ROBERT,_ TRAVEL & TRAINIXG, : 00 ,-- ' 30 woo 2496 541400 06/17/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 662.50 662.50 2497 541400 06/17/88 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 8 8 2 _� ;;a i O iU _. _.._ ,1.1,033 T %TER_ - _ _-_ _.. XAS _-SER_V.ICE CALL ..MAIN. SEWER- 33,50-- - -33- 5 3369 020200 07/11/88 AEC ENGINEERS FEES FOR SERVICE 74.00 74.00 3370 020840 07/11/88 ALDY GRAPHIC SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE 64.80 64.80 _a7-1 1 -1 / -S, -AMATEUR RADIO. -SCHOOL KB6MT .-PROGRAM SUPPLIE*S 3372 OZ 1 150' 07/11/88 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC. SUBSCRIPTIONS MEMEBERSHIPS 295.00 295.00 3373 021800 07/11/88 A M TECH PRINTER REPAIR 62.50 62.50 ANDERSON CAROLE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 3375 030475 07/11/88 ANDERSON DIANE PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 1Z.00 1z .00 •:376 040800 07/11/88 AR MECHANICAL SERVICES COIL CLEANING 194.33 194.33 /&8 - ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR &--MAINT/VEHICLE -18.95 REPAIR MAINT/VEHICLE REPAIR MAINT/VEHICLE 725.45 280.01 REP-A 1 R .-.& MAINT/V.EHI,CLE - 3370 061000 07/11/88 BANICK JOHN CANINE ALLOWANCE 35.00 35.00 ' -- ---. r:=-. �^ �^ �z�c�- ^",'_t- `°- 'e ^- "' °- r_"a" --=-_ . _._�°.L..� -:r' :^�... ..,,.., ._. _ ^ ^. - - r._""_ -_.. _ ._ _ -, _,� �. , ...,�..,tw�•4,..rt _ �"'.°""�.� x �_�*w sww <en ,a.. R•nyMr'e:'l�•;.�..vr- ..TV,...- :,. :�rrnx :.�!etznt+<+n,ea - rn» _ mee . .a, _ 0v UC:HREG CITY OF MAPLEI {IDOD FADE 3 06 /30 /88 14:12 VOLIC:HER /C.HECK REGISTER FOR PER'10D 06 j.� 3391 101400 07/11 BUILDERS SQUARE GLASS - HAMMER AXEHANDLE SAW- LUMBER 46.54 78.83 125.37 ' CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRI PTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 3379 061100 07/11/82 BANN IGAN S KELLY P.A. LEGAL & FISCAL 89. 25 .' LEGAL & FISCAL 2 81.25 LEGAL . Z.. FISCAL X62-.50. � FEES FOR SERVICE 10, 410.41 LEGAL. & FISCAL 135.00 !, MAY LE G AL . _ --- - -- ' MAY LEGAL 393.75 MAY LEGAL 281.25 M AY LEGAL i MAY LEGAL 56.25 ' MAY LEGAL 56.25 21 , 666.02 ' 3380 061900 07/11/88 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 52.42 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 188.10 i ;.. ' MA I N.T_E NAN C , -- MATER SUPPLIES k_. i -- VEHICLE 87.02 367.44 , `` 3R 1 0 T l os 07 / 1 i � 8... .ERS 'RO.M ..C.R.A..LIa . _.__ _._...- ___.. ___._._...._ .__....._ ._._FRQGRA.M,.- ..SUP'PLIES -- - - - - -_ .- ___ -._ --.-� � ` PROGRAM SUPPLIES 10.95 . 't PROGRAM SUPPLIES - POSTAGE 1 ; 25 19.15_ 3382 071850 07/11/88 BJERKNESS MARGARET M. PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 3.00 3.00 _ 33 - 9 - 3 071950 -0711 1.488 JUNE _RENTAL _ ...___ _ _._ _ _ _ __. _ __ _._ __ _._.__._ - ..._ __ Ts w 6_T.___ JUNE RENTAL 45.33 zn JUNE RENTAL 40 .00 _ JUNE --R ENT AL- ...- . -_ -._. --- .__.--- _____.�..__.________. _.__ ____..__ ._.. __. __.__..�___ _- ._4.0_„ p RENTAL 2 8.0 0 ' s JUNE RENTAL 28.00 260.00 3384 072000 OT/11/88 BLUEBERRY COMPANY +~ - _. STROLLING CLOWNS 80.00 80.00 , :. '' '' S 5 t1. SQ9.I1.�_.�Z! 1_11$ .8. -_ _ _ .I� 0 A R D -_ 0 F .. I S S L O N E R S _._ _ _.._. ___ WATER,. P R O J __ 81- 2 0 _ .. !' PROJ #5738 14 14 3. 3.$ 6______.4 ao_q_5.0 0 T / h l� 8 $ . T 0 B _l L. E.L1V._., _ &__ -A S. S.O C _._._ ._ _ _ . _. _ _. _ .. M A I N T E N A N C E __.. M A.T E R LA L. -___ -.. - ._.._ -.__ _. -..___ _ _ .__. _ _.- _ - - - - -_ ..__. _ .._ -- 1-, ._ 6 8 ... _.._. __ _ _ _ - _ _ .. __Y__ --1 -� -0 2 5-..6 8 - -- 1 3387 081150 07/11/88 JOHN BOHL CANINE RETAINER 35.00 35.00 ,s 07/11/88 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CABLE 148.34 148.34 3383 081300 t^ y •. - 3-329 .___0_9_0_55.0._ 0L7_/...11J.8.8 -- ..._BRAD..- ,RAGAN.,.L REPA I R.o. & _MAINT /VEHICLE _ . -- -- _ .._._._.._. ___ __._ __. - - -_._ .. .- 3.1_.._ ._...___-- _- .__._.___.___- jG 17 REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 1 ; REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 421.12 R E F' A I R -- &_.. -MAINT 1 V E Hl C: L E - .__... -_ __ __ __ _..._. _ -___ _._ _.__ _ -_ 7 7 .0 © .- . _._..._.._ ____.. __ . _. _._.... _____. �_ga0_� g � ___ All _ __ s.. 3390 090553 07/11/88 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING AUGER BORINGS 1 1 rr, F' j.� 3391 101400 07/11 BUILDERS SQUARE GLASS - HAMMER AXEHANDLE SAW- LUMBER 46.54 78.83 125.37 VOUCHREG 06/30/88 14:12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 PAGE 4 -- NUMBER CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 3392 101950 07/11/88 BYERLYS, PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2.95 2.95 33a3 - - -- x. ---.-OL7-1-11188----.CA-TL,IN--JDSETTE PROGRAM REG123TRATION FEES . ..... 3394 130130 07/11/88 KATHLEEN CHAMPION DANCE LINE 12.00 12.00 3395 130300 07/11/88 CHAPIN PUBLISHING LEGAL & FISCAL 173.40 LEGAL & FISCAL 170.00 343.40 �' 3396 130550 07/11/88 CHEMLAWN SPRING LAWN APP 363.00 363.00 �,' I 1 3090 0 - .---C-H-LLTGU-ACCG-"..T.3.-RECEI.-VAD-LE A/R-AMBULANCE BILLS #708249.-- ESTIMATED UNCOLLECTIBLE A/R 80606 �.,; ESTIMATED UNCOLLECTIBLE A/R 16.00- --.FZES -FOR . SE RV 4 . , 3398 131225 07/11/88 CHRISTENSEN CURT PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 24.00 24.00 ' f 3399 COLLINS KENNETH MEALS 061588 27.00 27.00 140900 07/11/88 0- 0- 1 A 1 -3 --..CLF.- ..TRA.NSP--GR TAT..I ON R EPAI R -S -_ 3401 141850 07/11✓88 CONSTRUCTION TIMES POSTAGE-HANDLING 12.00 12.00 �:.:: 3402 142400 07/11/88 COPY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 57.10 PRISM POLE BASE 26.00 83.10 ;,,t 3403 142500 07/11/88 CORPORATE RISK MANAGEMENT INS CONSULTING 150.00 150.00 a�� 3 4 0. 4 ---- 4— 142715 0- 2 1 i 1 I ra 8_ R06 R A 14 - E-S PROGRAM SUPPLIES 41.60 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 41.61 • PROGRAM SUPPLIES- 3405 143600 07/11/88 CXL SYSTEMS CABLES/SWITCHBOX 48.74 _.___.CABl_LEcS/SWITCHBOX. 74 --- --- PARALLEL PRINTER 20.52 118.00 DALCO SUPPLIES JANITORIAL. SUPPLIES JANITORIAL .205.,9,6- - .... -_._ __...__.. 8.00- -.__._ — -_ - ..__.._.._.. __. _- 197.96 � ` A 4 E 0 A 07VI 1 . .. .... SKAL-L_ TOOLS--.-- . - ------ x,. - 3408 145900 07/11/88 DONS PAINT BODY MIRROR REPLACEMENT 101.90 R EPA I R S 340.,,6 to 3409 202005 07/11/88 ADVANCE CORPORATION ENGRAVING 36.70 ENGRAVING '� ,,� 3410 230400 07/11/88 EAST COMMUNITY FAMILY FEES FOR SERVICE 12,500.00 12,500.00 • lo I ' d Lis*- VOUCHREG _^.�.^ _..._. :_rc..... =: r.;.,,..,..T.� +. .- ....,.,,. -. -+,L .,.. .._.. -.. ...., ;._- .- _., -.._ " < .... i... .h., +,w,,.m...- .....,t -.... CITY _ � yi+.'tl.!!n^T -"7x ; '.• «o• e• » ;�a!rr,..ax:n^ nrwnerr»rs .,rra!+e*e OF MAPLEWOOD - PAGE 5 06/30/88 14:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK ' 1 10 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT ' r 3411 230500 07/11/88 EAST COUNTY LINE FIRE DEPT. FUEL OIL 57.16 57.16 0. .__34.1Z______2 3 07_0 _07_11.4 /88.__. _.EAST _._S.I DE -- G. T.G. _.... _ ------ - . _._. _ SUPPLIES . - VEHICLE , _ .._ ...__. ____ _._. - _.. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE ___ _ .36.TZ._�_ 30.44 67.16 ( , 3._4._ 2 3 05taO 0 7_!_l.l ./_.$_8---r__._ EA S.T MAN_ . KODAK CO*-..--.-- D U P L I CAT I N G -L' O S T S 1 O 9 _,..4 Z . __ DUPLICATING COSTS 46-89 &a '� DUPLICATING COSTS 93.78 liz _ ....... . ..... ... .. -...D UPL..I CAT_I NG - -- COSTS__ __ _ ____.._ _ .__... ___- ___ ._____ ._ __ __ .. - ____. - -__ - 234., 4 , DUPLICATING COSTS 203.20 DUPLICATING COSTS 312.62 t5 ^ DUPLICATING COSTS r 265.72 } DUPLICATING COSTS 296.99 1 } ._.3 14 _.23 .1.50.0_._ - __0.71. 1 1185---- ..EDEN._..SYSTEMS._INC._ __ __ SUPPLIES OFFICE. - -- _ . _ _... 188.? -2_ .._. _ ----- 3415 231750 07/11/88 EKSTRAND JUDY PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 9.00 9.00 ` 3416 260350 07/11/88 FASTNER VICTORIA PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 9.00 9.00 FAUST. DANIEL__ ._____..__ _ _ _. _. _ VEHICLE ALLOWANCE _.. _ __ _-- ._....__ ____ 10...24 ; 3418 270300 07/11/88 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 99.36 MAINTENANCE._.MATERIAL 461.96. I 3419 290330 OT /11/88 FREEMAN STEVEN PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 13.00 13.00 i 3420 291200 07/11/88 FUN SERVICE JULY 4TH PROGRAM 1 1 _E GENERAL _REPA,1R. __._.- .. _ PUMP REPAIR._ _ __ . 1 Q4�. Q3 , 1,- 048 -.Q3_. 3422 302400 07/11/88 GEOTECHNICAL ENGNEER PROJ #87 -44 4 4 3423_ 310175 07/11/88 GOAR JEANETTE PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 6.00 6.00 _.....REPAI.R_...x MAINT /VEHICLE _. _ __.. _ _.._7..50 _.._.. __..._ ___.._ ._.7.50 { 3425 320525 07/11/88 GRUBER' S POWER EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MA INT /EQU I PMF_NT 7.95 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL _ _ _ _ _ 11 . 9 4 3426 320900 07/11/88 GUTKNECHT MARY ELLEN PROGRAM SUPPLIES 90.00 90.00 7 ____'___ 33 _ 330201 07/11 KEN H SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 52.00 TRAVEL TRAINING 13.50 65.50 F. 3428 ' 330225 07/11/88 HANDY HITCH x WELDING CO. INC. WIRING TO CODE 13.95 I TAX CUFF PRE INVOICE 2.97- 10.98 t � f r 342 9 i �- : J 3 0400 07/11/ r r+ HARMON GLASS r� REPAIR & MA INT /VEH I C:LE 54.14 54.14 , ?. _ -_3430 _ 3400.70 07/11/88 HEALY -RUFF COMPANY JUNE SERVICE 7Q .00 70.00. 8 VOUCHREG 06/30/88 14:12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 PAGE 6 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 3431 341715 07/11/88 HERLUND RICK PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 3.00 3.00 _343ZI 1 .1 tga,._ .-HEWLETT..- _P ACK AR 0 - CO. EQUIPMENT OFF.ICE. ------ PAINT PRINTERF 934-65 2 3433 _15082.15- 07 o 0__ ,U 3434 351300 07/11/88 HORSNELL JUDITH VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 11.18 11.18 3435 401080 07/11/88 JENSEN PAUL TRAVEL TRAINING 16.48 16.48 3A36 A C1 1 5 5 5% 07.11-IJAR -f-EES .... FOR-SERVICE 250,00 ____________ _x.58.- t��- _.___ -_..� 3437 401800 07/11/88 JOLLY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 15.57 15.57 u 3438 430605 07/11/88 KOLLMER LAURA PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 6.00 6.00 1. f 4 A -32 A 3 A ASE n 0 0Z11 118-8 KCIKESSH 3440 440225 07/11/88 KRINGLE VICKI PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 6.00 6.00 ------ -- --- 3441 460620 07/11/88 LEIDL GAIL H. PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 9.00 9.00 3442 4- 2 0 0111 SUPPLIES OFFICE__ SUPPLIES OFFICE 2.67 SUPPLIES OFFICE 5.33 SUPPLIES OFFICE 11.56 SUPPLIES OFFICE 17.78 41 4.;, S.-U-P-P.L-I-ES OFF I Ali SUPPLIES OFFICE 16.89 88.90 :714 4 lf" 470700 0- 7 LL L SUBURBAN .-NEWSPAPERS..---..--.--.--- NOTICE-- OF HEARING NOTICE OF HEARING 40.99 198.55 24444-480600 07,11 1 IRS 3445 500100 07/11/88 M.R.SIGN SIGNS & SIGNALS 744.85 S-IGNS & SIGNALS 79-6 3446 500500 07/11/88 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 26.85 UT1 I BLADES 12:3,84 at LIFT REPAIR KIT 82.72 233.41 3447 -Z00750 1-41-88- ---MALLORY ROCHELLE 'PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 1." 3448 501100 07/11/88 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 167.09 FEES FOR SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 211 a ' ." o TEMP SERVICES 215.60 TEMP EMPLOYEE PAY 215.60 3449 510250 OT/11/88 MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA FABRICS SUPPLIES OFFICE 19.00 19.00 MAPLEWOOD_. BOWL- FEES ..FOR SERVICE-.,- 67.50 FEES FOR SERVICE 24.75 92.25 3452 520800 OT/11/88 MEEHAN JAMES TRAVEL & TRAINING 92.21 92.21 3453 521800 07/11/88 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 1 1 MAY 36.95- 1 3456 541975 07/11/88 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL ADVERTISING 480.00 .480.00 3457 550900 07/11/88 MN MAYORS ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTIONS.& MEMBERSHIPS 10.00 10.00 _2A5 A N5 1 3459 5TO100 OT/11/88 MOGREN BROS. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 75.00 75.00 3460 570500 07/11/88 MOTOROLA INC EQUIPMENT 1 k REPAIR MAINT/RADIO 882.15 2,343.15 3461 610400 07/11/88 MUNICILITE CO. HYDRAULICPUMP 917.05 917.05 3463 630025 07/11/88 N.C.C.E.M. MEM ASSESSMENT 5.00 5.00 3464 630050 07/11/88 N.S.P. JUNE ELEC SERV. Z01.03 SIREN SERVICE 4.01 JUNE ELECTRIC S ERV 90.52 JUNE ELEC SERVICE 105.75 JUNE ELEC SERVICE 410.70 JUNE ELEC SERVICE .02 JUNE. ELECTR _17,30 JUNE ELEC SERVICE 90.02 SIREN SERVICE 2.73 JUNE-ELECTRIC SERV -138-15 06/30/8e 14:12 vouC*sn/C*EcK nsersTsn N� FOR pEnzoo na ' ITEM ITEM ^ NAME nEocnzPTzom Amouwr ^ TEMP oEnvzoEo 215.00 ` rsmP EMPLOYEE PAY 215.60 TEMP -SERVICES. --- -_---'-- 7o.*0 ------ -- '| Tsmp smpLovEs PAY 202.40 i ��'| rEmp oEnvxcEs '60 1 '6e0'5e |' 3449 510250 OT/11/88 MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA FABRICS SUPPLIES OFFICE 19.00 19.00 MAPLEWOOD_. BOWL- FEES ..FOR SERVICE-.,- 67.50 FEES FOR SERVICE 24.75 92.25 3452 520800 OT/11/88 MEEHAN JAMES TRAVEL & TRAINING 92.21 92.21 3453 521800 07/11/88 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 1 1 MAY 36.95- 1 3456 541975 07/11/88 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL ADVERTISING 480.00 .480.00 3457 550900 07/11/88 MN MAYORS ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTIONS.& MEMBERSHIPS 10.00 10.00 _2A5 A N5 1 3459 5TO100 OT/11/88 MOGREN BROS. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 75.00 75.00 3460 570500 07/11/88 MOTOROLA INC EQUIPMENT 1 k REPAIR MAINT/RADIO 882.15 2,343.15 3461 610400 07/11/88 MUNICILITE CO. HYDRAULICPUMP 917.05 917.05 3463 630025 07/11/88 N.C.C.E.M. MEM ASSESSMENT 5.00 5.00 3464 630050 07/11/88 N.S.P. JUNE ELEC SERV. Z01.03 SIREN SERVICE 4.01 JUNE ELECTRIC S ERV 90.52 JUNE ELEC SERVICE 105.75 JUNE ELEC SERVICE 410.70 JUNE ELEC SERVICE .02 JUNE. ELECTR _17,30 JUNE ELEC SERVICE 90.02 SIREN SERVICE 2.73 JUNE-ELECTRIC SERV -138-15 1 A VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOO.D PAGE 8 � 06 /:0/88 14:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 0r�, ,,,_ - V O U 4r E-1 E R / _ CHECK: VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK { NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT JUNE ELECTRIC: 15-56 I JUNE ELEC . SERVICE 92.34 � JUNE ELECT SERVICE 16.2:: - - ` JUNE ELEC SERVICE 5.95 f AUT PROT LTG 15.81 41630.80 I 3465 630800 07/11/88 NCR EQUIPMENT - OFFICE 204.48 REPAIR : MAINT /EQUIPMENT 15.00 -.._ REPAIR & MAINT /EQUI PMENT - .15.00 REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 15.00 REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 15.00 + REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 15.00 REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 15.00 I REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 15.00 REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT _. _ 15.00 IBM PRINTER SERV 46.90 IBM PRINTER SERV 46.92 , IBM PRINTER SERV 46,92 __ _ . __ - _ .. _. ------ IBM PRINTER SERV 46.92 IBM PRINTER SERV 46.92 � IBM PRINTER SERV IBM PRINTER SERV 46.92 IBM PRINTER SERV 46.9Z 699.82 : 8466 631200 07/11/88 NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSION SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS 208.00 203.00 j..._.._.�_. - -;34e I --- W-350 . .__._NEE -NAH FOUN.DRY.. CO. _._ _ ...._ MA- INTENANCE MATERIAL__ :468 640820 07/11/88 NEWTON MARY PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 13.00 13.00 1 !.! 3469 640822 07/11/88 NEUDAHL SANDRA PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 3.00 3.00 1 - ---- --x, 70-- -___ -_ ' _ ' __ __._07 / 1. 1/88 NORTH ST. PAUL. CITY OF U T I L I T I E S 66.00 ' UTILITIES 128.10 UTILITIES 1 1 I � 3471 662300 07/11/88 NO RTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 102.05 ...__... . .._.__...____._ ____ __.. .. Vii! TELEPHONE 38.90 'TELEPHONE _ ... . :313 , 9 0 TELEPHONE 38.90 TELEPHONE 52.65 TELEPHONE �` TELEPHONE 38.90 - TELEPHONE 19 .50 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 110.68 1� f� i TELEPHONE 67.95:' ... _ .._ .. TELEPHONE . .. _ .......... - _ 81-80 .._ ._. -.. - ._... -_. ._...- __._...... .. �._._ .._,___- _- .__._._. __...._._ ..L i I ,s TELEPHONE 28.99 < } TELEPHONE 47.37 TELEPHONE 10+6.84 1 � - _- _.- ' --� --- : ": ...- .,�.:. ; -.•,° T- " IUCHREG C I T Y OF MAPLEWOOD - �... r>» �` ._+ a «; ,F�a�.w.�y�m,- nr,^m'a?xafi's.. VC PACE 9 06/30/88 14:12 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FO PERI 0 I y CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT TELEPHONE 50. 5 52.40 ;. NORTHWEST INVESTMENT - PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS _- 5, 036.5, _ 5, 036 -t56- 3473 691150 07/11/88 O'NEILL AND BURKE EXCH ZONE /PLAT CODE 2.92 7 EXCN_ ZONE /.PLAT _CODE._, M " 3474 710350 07/11/88 PELTIER MARY M. PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 3.00'i , 3.00 � ?1 13 3475 710435 07/11/88 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 1,848.60 1 -' 34Z6 710455 $R ..PROGRAM._ REGISTRATION FEES._ i 3477 711100 07/11/88 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA PROGRAM SUPPLIES 15.50 15.50 3478 711500 07/11/88 PHOTOS TO GO 12 EXPOSURES � N 5 19 5.19 z, N.EY____B 0-W E.S-. -- -- b ____.__ _ ___ S.0 P P L.I F_S_ . - -___. OFF_ L -C E . -- .._ Z OUTSIDE RENTAL - EQUIPMENT 66. 189.00 '3 761 __a480 140500 3481 741300 07/11/88 RAMSEY CLINIC FEES FOR SERVICE' 43.00 27 ` ____._._..... FEES FOR SERVICE' 4 3.0 0 r �� p PHYSICAL EXAM EMP 5.00 134.00� 3482 741700 07/ 11/88 RAMSEY COUNTY UTILITY INSPEC 124.23 ` POSTAGE 65.93 190.16 i 33 �' 1 3483 751350 07/11/88 R I CHARDS KOOA I D , CUPS , COOKIES 16.87 16.87 .1 '> 4 T .1.1..x.88 .ROGER HERNANDZ -. BAND __._._..__.__ .____..__ .__...___ _ ___._ - -JULY _4TH ._SINGER _ 3485 770900 07/11/88 RYDER TRANSPORTATION RIDES TO TWINS GAMES 125.00 125.00 ,3 10 3486 780300 07/11/88 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 12.80 5 , X31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.97 R° . C1 F F I C E ._..SUPPLIES O FFICE SUPPLIES 100.00 139.13 3.487 A 1_7 _8�___ SEH_.w _._ ____�__.__.._._ ___..... .L.. ___._.__._._ ._........___.___.__.__.THRU.,. MAY__.. _1..4___..SEF�VLCES__._...____. _;_�.--- ___._..__.__.... _......__. .5.,. . , 3 _.._- ___._.__- .__.._.__ _.-.- 4 t. ` 1r 5x 3488 800610 07/11/88 SIDE SHOW PRODUCTION JULY 4TH CELEBRAT 650.00 650.00 ' Fyi 3489 830500 07/11/88 LEE SOMERS CANCEL TENNIS LESSONS 12.00 12.00 f _- 2-4.9-0-A _..-.. ---- S- PS ....... OFF_ICE_..- .P_RO DUCTS ------ _..___._._ ..__.._. __.._._- __._T- SQUARE_ PURCHASE _._._.- _- _ -_..__ _. _ _______ - - - --- __._ �g SUPPLIES - OFFICE 60.36 1 ! SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.87 11 SUPPLIES - OFFICE { j :n i r vouoVREo 06/30/88 1+x12 C CK VENDOR CHECK HE NUMBER NUMBER DATE czTv OF mApLEw000 PAGE /m voucxEn/oxEcu nsezo7En FOR PE*zon oa VENDOR ITEM I ITEM C CHECK NAME DESCRIPTION A AMOUNT A AMOUNT SUPPLIES - OFFICE 2 25.52 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 1 132.36 SUPPLIES OFFICE 3 35.88 SUPPLIES OFFICE 5 56.65 SUPPLIES OFFICE 8 8.40 SUPPLIES OFFICE 1 14T.49 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 8 82.08 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 5 56.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2 25.08' PAPER 3491 8+0400 07/11/88 ar.rAuL nzTv OF LAB wonn 111.90 |]' � ~ � |1 _ TRAVEL & TRAINING 1 ; MA — '.� 515.14 ',._-''- ~� - -P_l,owsEw--'– w ---------------------��.T 3493 841900 07/11/88 STANDARD REGISTER OFFICE SUPPLIES 400.02 SUPPLIES OFFICE 226.17 Jv ADDED COSTS 88.65 734.05 A 3494 842260 07/11/88 STAR TRIBUNE PUBLISHING 103.80 103.80 LESS TAX PEN PENETR OIL 74.70 287.46 3496 843200 07/11/88 STEFFEN SCOTT CANINE ALLOWANCE 35.00 35.00 3499 860075 OT/11/88 T.S.W. INDUSTRIES, INC. ARTWORK 48.50 48.50 3501 860400 07/11/88 TAMMARACH BAND JULY 4TH BAND PERFORMANCE 325.00 3Z5.00 3502 860500 07/11/88 TARGET PROGRAM SUPPLIES 16.65 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 33.70 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 61.32 PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES OFFICE M w`. _ VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD 06/30/88 14:12 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER . FOR PERIOD 0 , __.,V,llU.C � HZR! CHECK - - - - -_ VENDOR _.___.__... _.__w...____ CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK AMOUNT NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT �! CUPS CANDY 7.98 i BALLOONS, PLATES 26.77 BLACK . FLAG _ - 25 M I S C ITEMS 9 .7 0 !. MARKERS KOOLAID 52.72 j ........ _ .._._._ - K0OL- AID 5 , j PLAYTEX 17.44 375.03 i 1_/_8 TARGET__ _ _ _PAPER: PLATES -E CT _. __.._. _ _ ._.._ ____ ._ _ ..23......7 S. _ , °j 3504 860700 07/11/88 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS MILEAGE PAY 20.70 20.70 3505 860725 07/11/83 LINDA TAYLOR CLASS REGISTRATION 76.73 76.73 4 35. 0--6._... ._.__8.6- t.ZOQ.__.____071.1. -1- 1.8.8.. - - -- ._TELEX . C.OMPUT.ER..__PRODUC.T_S, INC...___ MAINTENANCE CONTRACT. _ _ _.. _ -.._.. _.__.__. 545.79_ _.__.. _. _.. ___._.___.. __._..__ _ 45.7g_._ 3507 862100 07/11/88 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEV. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 6.00 REPAIR MAINT /VEHICL.E _ 165.28_ '= REPAIR MAINT /VEHICLE 5.87- 165.41 j 3 5 0.8._._._..._8. Z.L?- S Q__.._...0_.7__7..i_i!_. 8 8 _____. T 0 T A L _TOOL . _ _ _ . _ . ...... _ . _ MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 175.2:0. __ .. - ---- ,E 3509 871600 07/11/88 TOUSLEY FORD SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 47.02 HUBCAP SOLENOID 95 7f� 97 , j 3510 871550 07/11/83 TOWKINSON TED LAND IMPROVEMENT 80.00 80.00 3511 881100 07/11/88 TURNQUIST PAPER CO. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 290.16 290.16 CITY ...MUSICIANS JULY 4 BAND 7 6.0 0 __ 76.00 3510 900100 07/11/88 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 112.35 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 38.65- SHIRTS 7 ZIP 178.55 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 100.65 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING _ 156..30_ ' UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 26,05 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 85.00 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 143.75 HATS WHI STLES, WANDS 134.30 E COVERALLS 78.15 COVERALLS /SHIRTS 72,75 1 3514 900150 07/11/88 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES MAINTENANCE 80.00 . MAINTENANCE REPAIR °x MAINT /EQUIPMENT 48.00 REPAIR MAINT /EQUIPMENT 1423.00 REPAIR MAINT /EQUIPMENT 191.00 ; REPAIR S: MA I NT /EQU I PMENT 4; = . 00 REPAIR MAINT /EQUIPMENT 48.00 i _ REPAIR : MA I NT /EQU I PMENT 143.00 I 1-1 VOUCHREG CITY OF* MAPLEWOOD + -- - --- --- ------- --------- PAGE I 'Ll 06/30/88 14:112f V 0 L) CHER/CHECJ-': RECi101_jTER FOR PERIOD 06 _VJU.0 C H E R CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT REPAIR & MAINT/EQUIPMENT 48.00 REPAIR & MAINT/EQUIPMENT 96.00 REPAIR- & MAINT/EQUIPMENT- 72.00 REPAIR & MAINT/ELQUIPMENT 120.00 REPAIR & MAINT/EQUIPMENT 48.00 REPAIR &-MAINT/EQUIPMENT 48.-o'o RIBBON, TAPE 90.93 SHARP RIBBON 31.36 1 3515 901300 07/11/88 UNITEDF SUPPLY CORP. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 84.90 ► SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 209.34 294,24 3516 912100 07/11/88 VIRTUE PRINTING BUILDING PERMIT 162.40 SUPPLIES OFFICE 22.80 185.20 V.W.EIMICKE ASSOCIATES SUPPLIES OF510E 86.48 86.48 3517 921100 07/11/88 3518 931450 0711 8-8---W.Al-L-Y—IIC—CARTH.YS-PONT.IL-AC--..-.-----.,-,----..--., REPAIR_ -& --MAINTENANCE - --- -- ---- LESS TAX 3.60- 281.73 _2549 9 31 85 0 07 1 8.____WARRE1►t --MARY.-.J PROGRAM_REG I STRATI-ONL-_.--FEES---"--- -" 3520 934750 07/11/88 WEBER PAM PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 9.00 9.00 3521 960600 07/11/88 XEROX CORP. SUPPLIES OFFICE 20.90 20.90 :35:7Z 9 -15% - off 1-1 Agenda Number It C-- — J 4) P,10,4AN!" w-FINC -IxT-m. 01 , 1410'ry Modif ied- Re AGENDA REPORT TOO Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director RE: Bud Chan - 1988 Labor Settlement DATE: Jul 5, 1988 INTROD.CTION Durin the past month the Council approved bud ad necessar to finance the 1988 labor settlements. An additional bud adjustment is needed to finance these labor settlements due to an oversi Rarwapniimn Thlk-.--cost of 1.988 labor settlements for AFSCME should have been $88,830, re qu .,irin g an additional $5,260 'transfer from the contin account to the appropriate department accounts. ACTION RE Council approval of precedin transfers and bud chan DFF/ch E 3 MEMORANDUM Action by. Council;' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT/OWNER: LOCATION: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager ---rse a........... .. . Randy Johnson, Associate Planner Modif imd~�..,.. Time Extension ReJ Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. Currie Lar Avenue and McKnight Road Cave ' �� C ie Street Addition June 17, 1988 SUMMARY Re t The applicant is requesting a time extension for Cave's Currie S treet Addition preliminary plat. (Refer to the map on page 4.) The applicant has graded the site and is waiting for approval of the ut ilit y p l ans r �t from the � . Paul Water Utility. He plans to begin ~� -- cons tr uc tion of the street and utilities this summer. There have |een no changes in city code or to the land adjoining - i this site that would warrant revising the con ditions of preliminary approval. Approve a one-year time extension for Cave's Currie Street Addition preliminary plat. REFERENCE Past Actions 7-1 " `'' � : Council approved Cave's Currie Street Addition t t the following conditions being. g preliminary plat, subject o o satisfied before final plat approval: 1 City engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. The grading plan shall maximize p of`the hill and trees on Lot One, Block Two, as much . po� sible. ` 2 Submittal of recordable deeds to the city engineer to transfer title Outl�ts A and B to the City of Maplewood or dedicate them t th e public on the plat for drainage and utility purposes. , 3. Submittal of a 100-foot-diameter easement for the temporary Currie Street right-of-way. 4~ Provide .a twent drainage easement over the north twenty nty feet of Lot One, Block Ones developer's ement and required 5. Submittal of a signed ��gr�e surety forthe following items: a. Construction of all required public street ponding and utility improvements. d b. Construction of a driveway t urn~aroun for Lot Eight , Block One. c. Construction of a driveway for Lot One, Block One., that complies with the requirements of Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. This driveway shall be constructed as far to the east of the property as possible and be aligned to retain as many mature trees as possible. d, Construction of the temporary Currie Street cul-de-sacig 6 Revision of the lots in Block Two as shown on page 4 to " ti f the trees and hill preservation o e l qn Lot One, Block . Two, and provide room for a 100-foot setback to the future house. 7 Show the existing, small triangular piece of right-of a by the County at the corner of Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road. Jl pittactiments 11 Location Map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Letter from the applicant � RI R N c J i R tk O [ sco � w v -- o IC sec LOCATION MAP }� 3 Attachment 1 4 N Cave's Currie Street Addition Preliminary Plat (As approved 7- 13 -87) . 4 Attachment 4 N • .. , . R M C. ?u A cif L�K M Nw M � t , L •-- LSO. N -- LUT •• LARPEHTEUR AVE* All f I W 100 -foot setback from pipeline Ln 1 � ; •• ��� . z - co .. t Q • �s ML 3 =3 1 � s : OMOT 0 ! 2 s . • • 4 � • �. �s Ln !- --- — — — --_ W Ix X M �o �'. 33 . JIM -- — — — - 00 �0 ' &M I Ww IA I MW N M /N M M iii. u Cave's Currie Street Addition Preliminary Plat (As approved 7- 13 -87) . 4 Attachment 4 N 6.16.'88 ED CAVE &SONS, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS 2301 WOODBRIDGE ST. - SUITE 202 ftOSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 SAM CAVE, PRESIDENT June 14, 1988 Mr. Randy Johnson City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Mn 55109 SUBJECT: Caves Currie St Addition Dear Mr. Johnson: CAVE NEW HOMES LAND DEVELOPMENT RENOVATION COMMERCIAL 482.9667 Please ask the City. Council to extend the approval of the subject Plat for another year. The closing of McKnight and Sterling have slowed our sales so that we will need more time to get to this plat. We have completed the grading and are prepared to build the utilities as soon as the market demands. Sincerely Yours, Samuel S. Cave, President Ed Cave & Sons, Inc 5 Attachment 3 J ' TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Final Plat — Maplewood Meadows DATE: July 5, 1988 Action by Modifie ej ecte -- at -- Councilmember Bastian added this item to the last agenda. Council tabled it until July 11. Conditions 1, 7, 8 and 11 of the preliminary plat approval have not yet been met. .(See attached minutes.) 11T nnl inn T^RI The uncompleted conditions are administrative in nature and do not require Council review. RECOMMENDATION Approve the final plat, subject to completing the preliminary plat conditions before the plat is signed by the City. 0 IN T aTE — HIO Nyya Y ` _ 1 NQ • - 6 94 1? .. 13 + \ + • _ 1` '° 1 - doub -f ront i n 1 ots 9 r , 1 d 4 1 3 Z j .� , , .�I 1 w• Nr �.. �Ir •.-r •..ire , • •� .. M ( as 60 64 416 60 40 10 AJ* 14 comb Saw 0 r - 'Standard-sized 1 ! : lots �9• sas •psi• weld! '����• •ss! sa.! •�.�a is •ass�i sass! sswsssss •si! !!ss !ss• ! l�js alss ,rtils.l!! 0060400 � -- -� -r.r ��� �� r --• --- --- - -•• -- -r-r -- .. '_ -- -- -•��- --mow• r .- Ana a � Ama.r•bI r• Imo•.•• rr �' _.. J r r .0 .L~ 1 C�IM� • dtftaT C k aw" # W �Al� ! �� � � � � � dI11OR„ alR�O"► I dlR+/7 I • to a R06ERT TILSE - L S , HEIGHTS .� M No. 9 ---- - - - - -• 100-foot setback line Location of Amoco Pipeline 100 -foot setback l i n e Preliminary Plat Attachment 4 N r / ,r 3. PreliminaryPlat: Maplewood Meadows y a. Manager:McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Maplewood_IIeadows Addition nreliminar plat (plans dated 5- 19 -87) subject to satisfaction of the � I ef" A e, f llowinp conditions prior to final plat approval: 1. District Court approval to release the City park land that was previously vacated, subject to retaining a ponding easement over Outlots C through I. 2. Any portion of the former park that will be combined with property to the south shall be designated as an outlot. A recordable deed for each outlot to be transferred shall be submitted to the City. the City will record the deed(s) once the plat is recorded. A check for the recording costs shall be submitted with the deed(s). The property owner to receive the deed must agree to accept it. 3. Any of the former park land that is not included in condition two must be combined with the adjacent lots.to the north. Lot lines shall coincide with the proposed lot lines to the north as much as possible. 4. Redesign the plat for Staff approval to provide for at least a 100 -foot setback from the pipeline or provide at least a six - foot berm to protect the homes within 100 feet against the radiant heat from an explosion. If berms are provided, the homes may not be constructed within 80 feet of the pipeline. S. Omit Lot 21, Block Two, if the adjacent park land to the south is not included. Lots 18.through 20 may be redesigned for double - dwelling lots. 6. The pipeline easement must be clearly labeled and designated on the plat. The easement must be included in the title for each affected property. b , \ � Submit recordable deed restrictions for each double- fronting lot to prohibit access from County Road D. - 27 9/14 r 0 �l 80 City g recordin of the previously adopted resolutions to vacate Lakewood Drive between Brenner Avenue and County Road Re- cording din of these easements is subject to the submission of the developer's agreement to guarantee compliance with the condi- tions of vacation. 9. City Engineer approval of the final grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans. T.he portion o the grading plan within the Amoco and NSP easements must also be approved by these respect corporations. the grading plan shall be revised as follows: a. If the property owner to the south of proposed Outlot C will receive proposed Outlot C, then the pond shall be shifted to the north and west to minimize its encroach- ment on this outlot. Grading of this outlot area shall also be minimized. b. The P i eline's elevation and location shall be shown on the P grading plan. C, The erosion control recommendations made by the Soil Con - servation Service in their letter dated June 29, 1987, shall be complied with. d. A skimming device shall be provided at the pond outlet to prevent an oil leak from going downstream. 10. The p ortion of the plat located east of proposed Lot 21 shal be named "Bellaire Avenue". � 7 �C 11. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, to include but not be limited to: a. Enlarging the pond, as directed by the City Engineer, west of Lakewood Drive and constructing storm sewer from this site to that pond. b. Construction of all required on -site public improvements* c. Removin g the Lakewood Drive street surface north of Gall Avenue and seeding the vacated right -of -way. d. Replacing the asphalt curb at Brenner Avenue and Lakewood DAve with a concrete curb. e. Adherence to the erosion control procedures outlined on page four of the Soil Conservation Service's letter dated June 29 19 87 . . . Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. . ' .. , " < . ) Action by I: (' Endorse ' Modlf ied__~_~_�_� MEMORANDUM , ReJeoted-~_~�~�_� TO: City Manager Da FROM: Thomas Ekstrand-Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal/Amendment: LOCATION: 1201 Frost Avenue APPLICANT: Jonathon and Timothy Skon OWNER� John Blake, Jr., PROJECT: S and G Auto DATE: June 14, 1988 Introduction SUMMARY �� � � ��� The applicants are requesting renewal of their conditional use permit (CUP) for used car sales. They are also requesting approval of a revision to the CUP to allow them to sell cars, but not display them, before the blacktopping is installed. Back ' On April 13, 1987, council granted this CUP subject to: a. No more than two automobiles shal1 be displayed for sale at any one time that would be visible from Frost Avenue. b. No more than four vehicles shall be offered for sale at any time. c. A portion of the gravel parking lot shall be blacktopped and striped as determined b the*communit design review board, d. No cars shall be within fifteen feet of the right-o+-way, unless the community design review board approves a parking lot with a closer setback. e.. Vehicle parts are not to be stored outside. 2. A paving plan has not been submitted to the review board for approval. I Discussion The reason for requiring paving was for the display of cars for sale. If the cars are not displayed, there would be no need to require paving as part of this permit. Recommendation Renew the permit for one year and adopt the resolution on page 7, which amends the conditional use permit at 1201 Frost Avenue to sell used cars" Approval is subject to (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): 1 No vehicle shall be disp-l---a for sale until bituminous Pav-in no more. than two automobiles shall be displayed for sale at any one time that would be visible from Frost Avenue. 2 " No more than four vehic1 es shal l be offered for sa1*m at any time . 3 ' ,arw, d t The communit design review board shal 1 approve theAa p-avin - and strip_in plan 4. No cars shall be /within fifteen feet of the right-of-way, unless the community design review board approves a parking lot with a closer setback. 5. Vehicle parts are not to be stored outside. � Site Description 1. Site size: 1.02 acres 2. Existing land use: a single dwelling at 1201 Frost Avenue. Behind the house is a metal building containing S and S Auto, Arna1's Auto Repair, and Blake Excavating, SUrr0Undinq Land Uses Northerly: aDNRtrailway (abandoned Soo Line) Southerly: Frost Avenue Easterly: Map lewood Dairy Westerly: Blacktop Driveway, Inc. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Land Use Plan designation: SC, service commercial 2. Zoning: BC 3. Section 36-153 (2) (e) allows used car lots in a BC district by conditional use permit. 4. Section 36-442 (b) states that approval of a conditional use permit shall be based on the findings in the resolution on page 7. 5. Section 36-442 (e) states that all conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval , unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. 6. Section 36-442 (g) states that in the event the council in its review process decides to consider imposing additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit. . . mb Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Applicant's Letter dated March 30, 1988 4. Resolution 3 • v R' F R couNrY R F R• F • �, R . L.� W W F J R v • M I' R 8c M i MI M I C .RN • , LEL A N O (R2) � o � v F .,....� . 1, � • JtU IRXE AVE V F AV • j� F o � z R AV / • �n � � LBF ® a � R3jR c W •� F� �R 13 C �� F JH4LEN Q R-3C' I/ LAURIf Cr sr� 0 T' N /' ON MAP LOCATI i ,. 4 • Attachment 1 0 K R PUD R s z r- _ R � i •. RoAo . R2 — R ' • PUO I F R Rz 1 11 a MI W EDGEm • F W F T • or a R l9C J � �• R R • 0 `�• •��• SEXTAN AVE Q Ml R R Y R M1 Q V► iM 4V MI ® R M 1 R T"x WAY M I � oc • A i c: • • • I i I 1 I a TY of ST. PAa �o ■ S & A u : p •IT � loo Park �4 .�t, _ ..•� c s a s is ,y • or `o :'Q• •' �e ,�� 3 1187 fN I �> 1221 40 U we 1n �p ° 9 Undeveloped Land �• — !4 R3 4 g 2 r ■■■ 33 on to PROPERTY /ZONING MAP 5 Attachrt I 4 N 3/30/1988 To: Mayor Greavu, City Council Members From: Jonathan Skon S &S Auto 1201C Frost Ave Maplewood MN. Subject: Conditional use permit /S &S Auto This letter contains current status of S &S Auto's request for a conditional use permit to sell used cars. I would like to propose terms to allow said permit to be awarded. S &S Auto will be able to comply with all the conditions set forth by the City Council on April 13, 1987 except for one; blacktopping of its location at 1201 Frost Ave. The recommendation was that the property owned by John Blake and rented by S &S Auto (1201 Frost) be black- topped for 120 feet back from Frost Ave. The cost of this blacktop would be aproximatly $10,000.00. Since S &S Auto is a very small automotive business (that is trying to diversify by selling a small amount of used cars each year), I , as owner, can not possibly afford to fund the blacktop. on the property I rent. Relocation would be less costly. My landlord, John Blake, does not wish to spend $10,000.00 to keep one tennant. He feels that since he was assessed over $4000.00 in 1987 for improvements on Frost Ave, in addition to a tax increase of $1500.00, he could not afford to pay for blacktop until late 1988, or 1989. I propose that S &S Auto be granted a conditonal use permit prior to blacktopping the property with one limitation: S &S Auto will not display any cars for sale until the blacktopping has been done. Cars would only be sold through individual newspaper ads and shown by appointment. I realize that the 5 different businesses at 1201 Frost as a whole are not attractive when viewed from the street, so I will continue to keep my section of the property neat. I would like very much to be able to keep my place of business in Maplewood and therefore hope that. you and the City Council will give my request consideration. Sincerely Jonathan Skon Owner: S &S Auto 6 Attachment 3 MAR 3 0 190 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Jonathan and Timothy Skon initiated a conditional use permit to sell used cars at the following-described property: Lots 1-9, Block 4, Lincoln Park and the west half of vacated Duluth This property is also known as 1201 Frost Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was approved by the Maplewood City Council on April 13, 1987 subject to the following conditions: a. No more than two automobiles shall be displayed for sale at any one time that would be visible from Frost Avenue. b. No more than four vehicles shall be offered for sale at any time. c. A portion of the gravel parking lot shall be blacktopped and striped as determined by the community design review board. d. No cars shall be within fifteen feet of the right-of-way, unless the community design review board approves a parking lot with a close, setback. e. Vehicle parts are not to be stored Outside. 2. This conditional use permit amendment was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on June 20, 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Counci1 held a pub 1ic hearing on v 1988 to consider the amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law" All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations 0f the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be amended on the basis of the following findings-o+-fact: I The use is in conformity with the city~s comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. ' 7~ The usa would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. ' 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be de�trimental to the welfare of the city. 91 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development desi*gn~ 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental e++ects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. No vehicle shall be displayed for sale until bituminous paving and striping is provided for the vehicle sales area. After paving i id d than t t displayed s prov e , no more an wo automobiles obil ee s h l a l b e f or sale at any one time that would be visible from Frost Avenue. 2. No more than four vehicles shall be offered for sale at any time. 3. The community design review board shall approve the paving and striping pl / 4. No cars shal l be within fi+tee» feet of the right-of-way v unless, the community design review board approves a parking lot with a closer setback. E001 5 Vehicle parts are not to be stored outside. Adopted this day of , 19880 Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAI SE Y ) ) CITY CE MAPLEWOOD I , the undersigned , being the dU1 y qual if ied and appointed cl erk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held can the day o+ , 1988, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a f ul 1 , true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such cl erg: and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988 City Clerk City of Maplewood it P1anning Commission -2- Minutes 6'20-88 VII%. NEW BUSINESS A. Conditional Use Permit Renewal and Revision: 1201 Frost Avenue (S & S Auto) The staff report was presented to the commissioner�" Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission renew the permit for one year and adopt the resolution which amends the conditional use permit at 1201 Frost Avenue to sell used cars. Approval is subject to (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): , provided for the vehicle sales area A-fter ,_iavin is vided,. no more than two automobiles shall be displa for sale at' an one time that would be visible from Frost AvenUen 2. No more than four vehicles shall be offered for sale at any time. 1P -ed the it design review board 4. No cars shall be within fifteen feet of the right-of-way, unless the community design review board approves a parking lot with a closer setback. 5. Vehicle parts are not to be stored outside. Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes--Axdahl Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempseyv Fiola, Fischer, Goins B, Lot Width riance: 117831 h1man ) The staff report w'P-. present to the commissioners b Rand Johnson, Associate nner and discussion followed. V. e commission approve the ' and that he not b� lot -width variance "' variance, and amendment" Mr" required Kr use said he felt he reqLti ed findings for approval a+ .m variance have, in his case .een met. The commissio and applicant di ussed the history and dimensions o other lots in the ea. F . C2 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Randall Johnson, Associate Planner ,SUBJECT: Code Variations LOCATION: South of Fish Creek, West of I-494 APPLICANT: Lawrence D. Anderson (Contract for OWNER: Kenneth G. Duclms DATE: June 14, 198e SUMMARY Action b Council. Endorsed Modif ie Raj eote Dat Deed Theapplicant eventually plans to submit a preliminary plat application for a 9.8 acre parcel in Maplewood's "critical area". Before incurring the expenses to prepare a preliminary plat, the applicant is requesting approval of three variations from city code: A. Subdivision code variations: 1, To develop seven, 40,000 square-foot lots with on-site sewage disposal systems. The Critical Area Plan recommends a minimum lot area of three acres (130,680 square feet) with on-site sewage disposal systems. City code requires a minimum 10t area of 10 square feet with sanitary sewer in all new streets. Therefore, a variance would be required for on-site sewage disposal systems. 2. To substitute ditches and 3- to 5-foot-wide gravel shoulders along new streets for storm sewer, curb and gutter. City code requires storm sewer, curb and gutter in al new streets. A variance is required. Finding needed to approve a variance from the subdivision code: Section 30-11 states that the city may approve variations from the requirements in specific cases which do not affect the general plan or the intent of this chapter. B. Street design variation: To build 24-foot-wide streets. City code requires residential streets to be 31-36 feet in width. Finding needed to approve a variation from street design standards: Section 29-52(b) states "the city council may permit variations from the requirements of 29-52(a) (Street Design Standards) in specific cases which, in its opinion, do not affect the general purpose of this section." Refer to the applicant's letter on page 14 and his development concept plan on page 11. Discussion The critical area and sewer plans include policies that distinguish this area from the remainder of the city by allowing on-site sewage disposal systems, rather than public sanitary sewers. The applicant is also requesting council to distinguish this area from the remainder of the city regarding street design and storm sewer requirements. Development of the applicant's ten acres will set the tone for the remainder of this area. Any variations granted to the applicant would 'probably have to be granted for the owners of the adjoining thirty ± acres, if requested. Minimum lot area and sanitary sewer variance: Sufficient data is not available to determine if the requested 40,000- square-foot lots would safely support on-site sewage disposal systems in this' area. Soil type and steepness of slope are the two critical factors that determine whether an on-site system will function properly for a particular lot area. This data will not be available until a grading plan is approved for this area and soils data is obtained for each proposed lot, based upon the approved grading plan. The Soil Conservation Service's soil survey indicates that the soils in this area may not be suitable for on-site sewage disposal. The Environmental Health Official believes the present three-acre minimum lot area requirement will adequately compensate for the poor soils. Lot areas of less than throe acres may be acceptable, provided the number of on-site systems is not greater than can be handled by the soils. Too many on-site systems could result in improperly treated sewage effluent entering the ground water, Fish Creek, the planned six-acre-foot pond or possibly pooling on the ground surface. If ditches are allowed to be substituted for storm sewer, soil moisture will be increased, which could also add to these problems. Since improperly treated effluent from on- site sewage disposal systems poses potential environmental and public health hazards, council should require a thorough evaluation of these concerns before reducing the three-acre minimum lot area for unsewered developments in this area. The alternative to on-site sewage disposal systems is the construction of sanitary sewer. Unfortunately this solution presents two serious problems and, therefore, should not be pursued. First, sanitary sewer would result in smaller lots and the potential for twenty to thirty additional families in this neighborhood. Since access to the area is restricted to an excessively long dead-end street, the Director of Public Safety could prefer the density to be kept as low as practical . Long, dead-end streets reduce public safety's ability to guarantee delivery of timely emergency vehicle services. Second, a permanent lift station may be required. Lift stations should be avoided whenever possible, because they are costly to operate and maintain. Street width variation: 2 The minimum local street width presently required is 32 feet from gutter to gutter. This is considered to be the narrowest width that allows the safe passage of two vehicles, without restricting on-street parking~ The applicant contends that there will not be a need for on-street parking with 40,000 square-foot lots; hence, a 24-foot-wide street will be adequate. There are several problems with this argument. First, unless the dwellings and garages are set back significantly deeper than thirty feet, this development would have the same potential for on- street parking as a conventional subdivision. Second, even if ade off-street parking area is provided, some people may prefer to park on the street when several cars are involved, so as not to block someone in or get blocked in themselves. This situation constitutes a potential public safety hazard. If a car(s) is parked along a narrower than standard-width street, timely emergency vehicle access cannot be guaranteed. This is of particular concern because this neighborhood would be located on an excessively long dead-end street, at the outer reaches of the service area for the nearest fire and paramedic station. Posting the street for no on-street parking would not guarantee that on- street parking would not occur. Finally, no less than a 28-foot-wide asphalt road is justifiable for either "rural" or "urban" street sections, according to MnDOT design standards. The applicant has proposed a 24-foot-wide asphalt road with 3- to 5-foot-wide gravel shoulders. Gravel shoulders are unacceptable due to unnecessary maintenance costs. Recommend at i on I. Table the variation and lot size request to allow on-site sewage disposal facilities, rather than sanitary sewer, south of Fish Creek until: A. The city approves a grading plan for a preliminary plat. B. Submission of an analysis by a qualified expert as to the suitability of each proposed lot for an on-site sewage disposal system. This analysis must be based upon the approved grading plan and show that the proposed lot dimensions will be adequate to treat the effluent from each on-site sewage disposal system, so as not to have a negative effect on the water quality of Fish Creek, the planned storm water pond or pose the threat of a health hazard for any area resident. II. Deny the requested variation to substitute ditches for storm sewer, curb and gutter, on the basis that approval would be inconsistent with and adversely affect the spirit of the subdivision code because: A. Ditches would cost more to maintain than storm sewer. B. Streets with ditches and resultant culverts have less aesthetic appeal than streets with curb and gutter. 3 C. _ Streets without curb and plow and, therefore, have the which results in unnecessary, D. Concrete curb and gutter broken 'pr cracked which prolo/ maintenance expenses. gutter er are more difficult to snow potential for more boulevard damage time consuming and costly repairs protects the pavement edge from being igs the life of the street and reduces E. I Approval would set an undesirable precedent for � other undeveloped areas that may be subdivided into estat lots n III Den th . y e requested variation to construct a street less than 32 feet wide, on the basis that: A. On parking could hamper or eliminate public safety's ability to guarantee the delivery of emergency services This is particularly of concern in this area because the only vehicle access would be from an excessively long dead-end street and this i located at the r '' area � s e ou er reaches of the service area for the - - - - fire and paramedic station, e nearest B. There is no guarantee that posting the street for "no parking" would eliminate all on-street parking. 4 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staf f not i f i ed the f our property owners within350feetofthissite" Ramsey County open space is one of the owners. Their comments are presented in the letter~ on page 16. The other~ three adjoining owners are opposed to this development because: 1. This plan (page 11 would cost us a fortuns» in assessments. 2a Far too man homes where no sewer and water is available. Staff reply: City water will be required if this property is subdivided. 3. This is suppose to be critical area--three homes per ten acres or three~acreminimum lots. There is no sewer or water. Staff reply: If on-site systems are permitted, any reduction from the three-acre minimum lot size must be approved by the Environmental Quality Board, as well as the city. Substantial technical Justification is recommended to be submitted before the c ity acts on this request. 5 REFERENCE Site Descript-.ion Gross area: 9.8 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Easements: A sixty private access easement running southwesterly across the entire site, (See the map on page 1O.) Surrounding Land Uses North: A farmstead located on an 8"4 acre parcel v that is planned for RL, residential low density use. East: Undeveloped property, planned for RL use" A six-acre-foot parcel is also planned for this site. South: Ramsey County Open Space West: A single dwelling on a 9.7 acre parcel On January 25, 1988 council authorized the parks director to negotiate for the purchase of the applicant's site, as well as the adjoining 30 + acres'. No funding is available. — Environmental 11 This site and the adjoining thirty + acres is open field with few trees. _ 2" A significant portion of the applicant's site consists of slopes in 3, The Soil Conservation Service (GCS) has mapped ten different soil groups for the forty-acre area" According to SCS information nine of � these soil groups consist o sands and gravels suitable for construction purposes" Due to their fast permeability, these soils present a potential hazard of pollution for any nearby underground water supplies and to Fish Creek, if used for on-site sewage disposal " The tenth soil group, which is located on the easterly portion of the applicant's site is a poorly drained soil that may also not be suitable for on sewage disposal. It is also subject to frost heaving, which can cause � structural damage to streets and utilities. Tom Petersen., with the Ramsey County Soil Conservation District, has also stated that he believes that there may be a problem with the effluent from existing on-site systemoz in this area running into Fish Creek without being adequately treated. More data is needed particularly if on-site ��site systems are to be permitted" « / R I. Land use plan designation: RL, residential low density 2' Zoning: F. farm residential 310 Policy plans: a. Critical Area Plan (1) Page 34: "Three-acre minimum lots and no central sewer shall be allowed for those future lots south of Fish Creek'" (Refer to the map on page 12.) (2) Page 38: "The city shall notify the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) prior to any amendments or discretionary actions relating to the Critical Area Plan or Regulations." (3) Page 37: The plan will be adopted . . . so that it is an official policy and decision-making guide that (the city) is committed to implementing. (Comment: The Critical Area Plan was adopted by council on 3- 1~79. This plan pertains to the area south of Carver Avenue and west of I-494. It was required to be adopted by the State of Minnesota to protect the bluff line of the Mississippi River. All communities abutting this bluff line were required to adopt such a plan.) b. The sewer plan identifies this area as the only area in the city that does not "have ready access to existing sewage collection facilities" and that the city "may allow on-site systems on a permanent basis for large, estate-lot development. 4. Compliance with city )and use plans: a. Section 30-8(b)(3) states "In no case shall cul-de-sacs exceed 1000 feet in length, unless no other alternative is possible. Comment: The applicant's proposed cul-de-sac would be about 3100 + feet from Carver Avenue. Once a future east/west street is - constructed north of Fish Creek , the cul -de-sac length would be reduced to 1900 +� feet. There is no other alternative to access this property. b. Section 30-12(a) states "The minimum necessary required land 1mprovemente ithin dedicated street rights-of-way in new final plats shall c1ude: (1) sanitary sewer facilities (2) storm sewer facilities (3) street, curb and gutter 7 (c) Section 29-52(a) (Street, Sidewalks and Public Grounds) states: 4) ". . . Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed at the same time as street surfacing; except that, where a permanent `rural' street design 1s approved by the city council, curbs will not be 8) "Residential streets shall normally be 31 to 36 feet in width, measured between faces of curbs." 1. Extension of sanitary sewer to this site may require a lift station, unless a feasibility study shows that a gravity line ca n be run along Henry Place or along they I-494 right-of-way. 2. A six-acre-foot storm water pond is planned to the east of the applicant's site. (Refer to page 13.) The southeast 1/3 of this site drains to this pond. The northerly 1/2 of the site drains to Fish Creek. The remainder of the site drains to the Mississippi River. ` The Director of Public Safety is opposed to development that must rely upon a 3100-foot-long dead-end street, particularly because this site is not otherwise accessible. The density should be kept to a minimum. An east/west should be constructed north of Fish Creek to reduce the length of the dead-end street as much as possible. kd 1. Location Map 2, Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Area Development Concept 4. Excerpt from the Critical Area Plan 5. Excerpt from the Drainage Plan 6" Letter from the Applicant 7. Letter from Ramsey County 8. Letter from Soil Conservation Service �01 LOCATION MAP Applicant' Site 9 Attachment 1 vii t qG'E OF NEWi9vi4T M y � w A N 1 ' I • ' � M�.�� -+rte • • ` Z��� 1 M J CR 1 1 x.74 mss. M 1 / h 1 � I 1 1 I 1 boe 4 i l'• -vR va. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 10 Attachment 2 � ail 4 .ti I f ' • ti t ; ' 1 � J 1 1 !t + +� . i •/ l 4 N d ' CJ v ' 1 / . ,/ RAMSEY Cal 1 ' - OPEN CL i m P C Q O ; z 0.1 .0 1 .. P • •• - .° 44, amsey Co i t ' Planned 3 AF storm water pond 1 • ,' �" ^' ....., • t i t ^ I''/ Planned future stree 4 `F Cre ek' - , •%� �`; -� �! D 2300 feet from - '- Carver Avenue �---- %to rm w � ter Pond - - �-` :., 1 3100+ feet. from , Carver Avenue. Once -� an east /west street, north of Fi sh Creek is constructed, this cul- de -sac would be reduced to 1900 feet of length, There 'is no other access alternative. / DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT (Submitted by Applicant) 11 Attachmen 3 4 N J G�•KY�R AVc:t1UL 1 i i .. �' s anda 4 Ilk In 4 0 UnIA • Cos -tie,. [VIS10 • .� - .. •..y • Ck IL 3 J acre Minimu r lo j �I Applicants Site Ir a ON �7 r 0 e r41W -W jr Aiv, ILI north 7 ,� 7 ' • L �✓ %7.", it ✓ �:.• fir ;, 1 '.� � � �. t'r,'•�. �.• t ' • sewer all Pt le %F 0.400 IL conce MOP A. 514 in I I G o i'fiSW Y'O r-I'(' c on-site OPEN SPACE Excerpt from the Critica Area Plan 1 2 Attachment 4 4 N • • CD 1 .. N •:• U ••� •.� T— •• r N ••• ;•; J r • .. . 0 •. . ;. ••• .00 •000 . . • 0 t o ... 0 0 4 0 .. • ... • ... • 0000..: • 0000 . * 0 0 0 460060*009 ttz 0 i MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE INTERIOR WATERSHED DIVIDES — PROPOSED STORM SEWER 42 ro EXISTING STORM SEWER a *V1 OPEN CHANNEL l STORM WATER STORAGE AREA l INUNDATION AREA - ... ....: .......................... STORAGE AREA VOLUME 4 AF DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS .................. .................. .................. �1 Excerpt from the Drainage Plan Applicant's Site (About 10 Acres) 13 Attachment 5 LJ N DAVID E. HANSING, P.E. Civil Engineer r `7 (' t t �, of Maplewo 1 P"M !'P,. Co. Rd. R 51(» R L)eve1_o fernerlt ;;r_?u t o f_ Fo x (re ( en t; , „lo 'are applying for a v,i ia.nce from your-- Sub - d Lvi.sion 0re1tna.nce LY.) regards to developinent of 10- a c „ rr�s o.f t(and in the most 1 3:vuther_ l.y tip of your City. . T}?e Own ers/ Dpvelo per of the property propose to ri.evel.0 the proper_ t,y in Low Density Sinwl_e Faniil_y s t we Fropo se a m I_n i lot size of �C), C)t�0 squ..ixe f. En” e t:, ro=ad width of A>4 feet, rural streets (w/ ditches):, no sewer (on -site systems), water, and underground l..If 11_ lties. The sketch plan we have subrn it k,ed shows seven lots on our 10 -acre piece. It also shows how the . area West and North of our property could be, deve 1- oped ustng this concept. City staff has determined that the development niust; t)e served with City wa. (for fire protection and health) . The present zo ning would :req 3 (mire.) lots, and would. not be developable if munic L- i_ ? -. 1_ w.Z t s req u ire d . Tb i s area is not readily served by sewer. T rte clo sest available :sewer is in Carver_ Avenue. Tile e1._- evat ton of Henry Street and. the creek make gravity sewer service difficult for everything south of the rre?et� . Nluch o )f the property in - this part of town is Ramsey County open- space, which will probably never be devel_o pPd, Tf sewer is made available to the property, then sma.1_*1er_ lot sizes would probably be appropriate. The property can only be accessed by one street OTenry Street). Whether to run another road across the creek is the City's decision, Suite 138. 11975 Portland Ave. So. • Burnsville, MN 55337 t Tel. '33C0-0C�a8 14 Attachment 6 Page Tbi.s urea could be an extremely beautiful level_ - opir)ent, wi Ii - ian,y o — the homes being walkouts with a fribljlou s view of the creek and/ or rives.. There is a vp:r_y goad market for this kind of development at this t tree. Your staff ba.s requested that we submit this ap- plication to order to get some of these policy de- c is tons made. Respectfully Subrni_tte(i, David L ,. Sian s inc , re F; . 15 N9 RAM COUNTY April 11, 1988 RAMSEY COUNTY PAR KS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2015 N. Van Dyke Street Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 -3796 Mr. Randall Johnson AICP - Associate Planner City of � �apl ewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Anderson Development Proposal Dear Mr. Johnson: Telephone (612) 777 -1707 Gregory A. Mack, Director Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed development south of Fish Creek. In general, we would certainly support the city's effort to purchase the property for open space. As we have indicated in earlier conversations regarding this matter, the remaining county open space funds are committed to acquire remaining parcels i our approved sites. If the development were to proceed, we would have the following concerns regarding the specific variances that have been proposed. 1) on site sewage disposal system - One acre lots seem rather small for on -site systems. Therefore, we would request the city to look very careful at this to insure that there is no impact on the adjacent open space property. 2) Streets without curb and gutter - Due to the steep topography on the open space site surrounding the site, it would be desirable to direct as much of the run -off toward the storm -water ponding area east of the site adjacent to the freeway. It would seem difficult to accomplish this without street curb and gutter and storm s$wer system. If the storm -water is not contained we would have very strong concerns about erosion on adjacent open space steep slopes, 16 Attachment 7 Mr. Randall Johnson April 11, 1988 Page 2 3) long .cul -de -sac - The length of the cul -de -sac does not directly affect the open space. However, if the develop- ment were constructed as proposed, we would request the city to provide a public right -of -way along the east side of development to access the open space south of the development site. This portion of the open space has some recreational potential, and should be accessible to residents of the area. Concerning the other question in your letter, we have no concerns regarding the east -west street between Henry Place and Dorland Road. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please keep me informed regarding this development. Sincerely, Gre g o ry A . M a' k` Director 17 . 31 �8 ST ATE OF MINNESOTA RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT DATE: May 26, 1988 TO: Randall Johnson, Maplewood Associate Planner FROM: Tom Petersen, Conservation District Manager SUBJECT: Soil Assessment for Anderson Development.Proposal Introduction The following report is a brief summary of inherent soils suitability for on site septic s at the proposed Anderson site. The interpretations are based on data contained in the Ramsey County Soil Survey. When selecting a specific location for an on site septic system, it is recommended that a q ualified Soils and Septic S Specialist be consulted to insure adequate design* II. Soils The following soils mapping units ma be found on site, 1558 (Chetek Sandy Loam 0 TO 6% slope) and 454 B, C, D, F (Mahatomedi Loamy Sand 0 TO 40% Slopes)* All 5 soil mapping units have limitations for on site septic s Limitations range from moderate to severe depending upon slope. All of the soils units have underlying material that is a mixture of sand and g ravel. Sand and g ravel will have rapid permeability and thus present an extreme potential for the contamina- tion of g round water and/or adjacent surface water resources* III* Recommendations Due to the potential limitations as cited by the Soil Survey and the proximity of Fish Creek, I recommend that the City require a detailed environmental assessment before allowing s to be established. Please note that there is existing evidence of septic system seepage into Fish Creek* AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 18 Attachment 8 Page Two I will be happy to assist the City in developing an environmental assessment.or in any other capacity relating to this site, /mb f ,. i i 19 Planning Commission -3- Minutes 6-20-88 ' The commissioners discussed several considerations of a« �� possible code amend..'= ^° Commissioner Fischer planning commission table the request for a lot-width e until either findings fqr a variance are met or a ndment is approved which would solve the problem. Commissioner Goin onded s_-Axdahl , Barrett, psey, Fiola, Fischer, ^� n�zzns Nays--Ayers, Cardinal C. Variances and Waivers: South of Fish Creek (Anderson) Secretary Olson explained the staff report on this project. Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish commented on the financing for the Ramsey/Washington Watershed District improvements. David Hansing, consulting engineer on this project, commented on the lot sizes of other communities and the street construction costs. Mr. Hansing said the project would not be feasible with only three lots. Mr. Hansing said he did not have grading plans and had not yet had the preliminary studies done -for this project. The commission discussed the lot sizes which will be proposed in this development, the soils, and environmental issues which will impact the area. Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission recommend: I. Table the variance and lot size request to allow on-site sewage disposal facilities, rather than sanitary sewer, south of Fish Creek until: A. The city approves a grading plan for a preliminary plat. Be Submission of an analysis by a qualified expert as to the suitability of each proposed lot for an on-site sewage disposal system. This analysis musi be based upon the � approved grading plan and show that the proposed lot dimensions will be adequate to treat the effluent from each on-site sewage disposal system, so as not to have a negative effect on the water qualit|, of Fish Creek, the planned storm water pond or pose the threat of ax health hazard for any area resident". Planning Commission -4- ' %I. Deny the requested variance to substitute ditches for storm sewer, curb and gutter, on the basis that approval would be inconsistent with and adversely a+fect the spirit of the subdivision code because: A. Ditches would cost more to maintain than storm sewer" Be Streets with ditches and resultant culverts have less aesthetic appeal than streets with curb and gutter. C. Streets without Curb and gutter are more difficult to snow plow and, therefore, have the potential for more boulevard damage which results in n time a c r u unnecessary, me consuming and costly repairs. D. Concrete curb and gutter protects the pavement edge from being broken or cracked which prolongs the life of the street and reduces maintenance expenses. E. Approval would set an undesirable precedent for other undeyeloped areas that may be subdivided into estate lots. ITI, l]eny the requested waiver to construct a five-ton road, rather than the required nine-ton design, on the basis that the street would be unnecessari7y susceptible to damage from the delivery of basic urban services such as school buses, garbage trucks, maintenance trucks and fire engines. IV. Deny the requested waiver to construct a street less than 32 feet wide, on the basis that: A. On-street parking could hamper or eliminate public safety's ability to guarantee the delivery of emergency services. This is particularly of concern in this area because the only vehicle access would be from an excessively long dead-end street and this area is located at the outer reaches of the service area for the nearest fire and paramedic station. B. There is no guarantee that posting the street for "no parking" would eliminate all on-street parking. Commissioner Dempse seconded Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission divide and vote each item of this question separately. Planning Commission Minutes 6-20-88 Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Dempsey, Ficxla Fischer Nays-'Cardinal , Goins Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission recommend: I. Table the variance and lot size request to allow on-site sewage disposal facilities, rather than sanitary sewer, south of Fish Creek until: A. The city approves a grading plan for a preliminary p|at. B. Submission of an analysis by a qualified expert as to the suitability of each proposed lot for an on-site sewage disposal system. This analysis must be based upon the approved grading plan and show that the proposed lot dimensions will be adequate to treat the effluent from each on-site sewage disposal system, so as not to have a negative effect on the water quality of Fish Creek, the planned storm water pond or pose the threat of a health hazard for any area resident. Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Goins Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission recommend: . II. Table the requested variance to substitute ditches for storm sewer, curb and gutter, on the basis that approval would be inconsistent with and adversely affect the spirit of the subdivision code because: A. Ditches would cost more to maintain than storm sewer. Be ' Streets with ditches and resultant culverts have less aesthetic appeal than streets with curb and gutter. Co Streets without curb and gutter are more difficult to snow plow and, therefore, have the potential for more bcYulevard damage which results in unnecessar time consuming and costl\, repairs. D. Concrete curb and gutter protects the pavement edge from being broken or cracked which prolongs the life o+ the street and reduces maintenance expenses. Planning Commission � Minutes 6-20-88 E. Approval would set an undesirable precedent -fop other undeveloped areas that may be subdivided into estate lots. Commissioner Dempse seconded Ayes'-Axdahl Cardinal Goins Nays--Ayers, Barrett, Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer The motion to table Item I% failed. Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission recommend: III. Table the requested waiver to construct a five-ton road, rather than the required nine-ton design, on the basis that the street would be unnecessarily susceptible to damage from the delivery of basic urban services such as school buses, garbage trucks, maintenance trucks and fire engines. Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes~—Axdahl , Barrett, Cardinal, Goins Nays--Fischer, Fiola, Dempsey, Ayers The motion to table Item III failed for lack of a majority, Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning commission recommend: IV. Table the requested waiver to construct a street less than 32 feet wide, on the basis that: A. On-street parking could hamper or eliminate public safety's ability to guarantee the delivery of emergency services. This is particularly of concern in this area because the only vehicle access would be from an excessively long dead-end street and this area is located at the outer reaches of the service area for the nearest fire and paramedic station. B. There is no guarantee that posting the street for "no parking" would eliminate all on-street parking. Commissioner Dempse seconded Ayes--Cardinal Goins Axdahl Nays--Avers, Barrett Dempsey, F'iola Fischer The motion to table Item IV Faileds Planning Commission Minutes 6-20-88 Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend: II. Denial of the requested variance to substitute ditches for storm sewer, curb and gutter, on the basis that approval would be inconsistent with and adversely affect the spirit o+ the subdivision code because: A. Ditches would cost more to maintain than storm sewer. B. Streets with ditches and resultant culverts have less aesthetic appeal than streets with curb and gutter. C. Streets without curb and gutter are more difficult to snow plow and, therefore, have the potential for more boulevard damage which results in unnecessarily, time consuming and costly repairs. D. Concrete curb and gutter protects the pavement edge from being broken or cracked which prolongs the life of the street and reduces maintenance expenses. E. Approval would set an undesirable precedent for other undeveloped areas that may be subdivided into estate lots. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Fiola, Fischer, Dempsey Nays--Cardinal Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend: III. Denial of the requested waiver to construct a five-ton road, rather than the required nine—ton design, on the basis that the street would be unnecessarily susceptible to damage from the delivery of basic urban services such as school buses, garbage trucks, maintenance trucks and fire engines. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--A.%.dahl, Ayers, Barrett, Fiola, Fischer, Dempse Nays--Cardinal Commissioner Dempse moved the planning commission recommend: `� Planning Commission Minutes 6'20~89 ' %V. Denial e requested of th �ted w aiver to construct a street less ' than 32 feet wide, on the basis that: A. On-street parking could hamper or eliminate public publio safety's abil to guarantee the delivery of emergency services. This is particularly of concern in this area because the only vehicle access would be from -an e�ceseivel�\/ long de`d-end street and this area is located. at the outer reaches of the service area for the nearest fire and paramedic station. Be There is no guarantee that posting the street -for "no ' parking" would eliminate all on-street 'parking. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes~-Axdahl, Ayers, ` Barrett, Dempseyv Fiola, �ischer Nays--Cardinal 8 U Abstentions- IX. X. COMMI A, Co ncil eting: June 13 , 1988 XI. '%OTAFr FPRE A. 27 188: Michael Ayers B. Secr ary Olson commented on the Development Fair which was hel d t th Civic Center the previous week. XII. ADJOURN ENT �\ MeetinoLadJourned at 9:58 p.m. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DATE: . ^ City Manager Associate Planner--Johnson Lot-Width Variance 1281 Kohlman Avenue Mary L. Kruse June 15, 1988 SUMMARY Introduction Aotlmz by OoumzoiI: Endorsed.-____ Modified____~__ Re1emted_.�_____ l, The applicant is requesting a lot-width variance of nine feet to build a single dwelling on a 66-foot-wide lot. (Refer to the a'plicant's letters starting on page 8 and the map on page 2. Section 36-69 of city code requires at least 75 feet of lot width for interior single-dwelling lots. Back round In 1968, council authorized the issuance of a building permit for this lot. State and city code, at that time, required approval of 'a variance after consideration at a public hearing. No evidence can be found to prove that a hearing was held. The city attorney, therefore, contends that "the 1968 approval is not binding on the city and that the applicant must at least apply for a variance." The applicant is unwilling to pursue the option of purchasing the required additional nine feet of land on the basis of this 1968 approval. Section 462.357, Subd. 6 of state law requires that the following findings be made before a zoning variance can be granted: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Undue hardship as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 2" The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent a+ the ordinance. Discussion This request does not satisfy both of the required findings. This lot is not unique. It is not the only undeveloped 66-foot- wide lot in this area~ There are at least three other such lots. (Refer to map on page 7.) One dwel1ing on a 132-foot-wide lot al so is not unreasonable, given the three dwellings across the street and a fourth dwelling abutting to the west are located on 132-foot-wide lots. Hence, the findings for a variance cannot be Staff concurs with the applicant that construction of a dwelling on this lot would probably not be detrimental to the essential character of the neighborhood since 12 of the 29 homes along Kohlman Avenue are constructed on 66-foot-wide lots. The four previous variances granted to build on substandard-width properties in this neighborhood were considered before the state law was revised to define undue hardship in terms of reasonable use and economic considerations. If council wishes to allow this lot to be built on, a'code amendment should be initiated. According to a recent survey, (page 11) many communities allow improvement of substandard-width lots-of-record without obtaining a variance. Recommendation Deny the requested nine-foot lot-width variance to construct a dwelling on a 66-foot-wide lot at 1281 Kohlman Avenue. Denial is on the basis that: l . Strict enforcement would not cause an undue hardship because ' of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration because: a. One dwelling on a 132-foot-wide lot is a reasonable use of the property, given that there are five lots with 132 feet or more of frontage within 350 feet. b. The plight of the landowner is not due to circumstances unique to this property. At least three other undeveloped 66-foot-wide parcels exist in this neighborhood. c~ Economic considerations are a principal basis for this request. 2. An undesirable precedent would be established. � CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed 34 persons who own property within 350 feet uf this'property. Of the 20 rsspondents, seven are in favor, five have .np' comment, and eight are opposedU ' One of the persons in favor that `new homes will tend to keep the neighborhood from deteriorating". This person suggested three conditions for approval : a) require a ten-foot-sideyard setback on each side, b) require the garage to be behind the house, and c) require the house to be deeper on the lot than neighboring h Th diti should alleviate omes, These conditions s ou any appearance of overcrowding. Those opposed raised the following concerns: 11 Only permit 75-foot-wide lots, as required by law. 2" The openness of the neighborhood lots would be ruined. It would put the houses too close to each other. 3. The only acceptable thing would be to put a house in the middle of the site and remove the old house. 4. It provokes higher-density housing. I'd rather see a bigger house built on the whole site, rather than see it chopped in half. P 3 REFERENCE Size: 132 x 638 feet (two pl atted 66-foot-wide lot ) Existing land use� A single dwelling and accessor structures on the east lot. The subject west lot is undeveloped. (These lots are presently combined for tax purposes. Their separation does not require city approval because they are platted lots of SUrrOUnding Land Uses North: Porche-Audi automobile dealership East: Single dwelling on a 66-foot-wide lot South: Two single dwellings, each centered on 132-foot-wide lots ' West: A single dwelling centered on a 132_foot-wide lot Past Actions T site: 10-17-68: Council authorized the applicant's father to build on the subject lot. (State law at that time required public hearings for approval of a variance. No hearing was held.) Other property in this neighborhood. (Refer to the map on page 7. ): 3-16-72: Council approved a lot division creating 1384 and 1390 Kohlman Avenue. Both of these lots are substandard in frontage- with 70feet. 12-19-74: Council approved a lot-width variance requested by Tony Oswald to develop the 66-foot-wide lot located at 1429 Kohlman Avenue~ 4-2-81: Council approved a lot-width variance to build on a 86- foot-wide lot east of 1389 Kohlman Avenue, Approval was on the basis that: i . There are houses on 66-foot-wide lots at 1417 and 1423 Kohlman Avenue and a variance was granted (to build on the 66- foot-wide lot) at 1429 Kohlman Avenue. 2. The intent of the zoning code would be satisfied. 3a Allowable densit Would not be exceeded. � m 2 . 1 Land Use Plan Designation: RL, residential lo w densit 2. Density: Present neighborhood density is 5.3 persons/net acre due to excessively deep lots. Assuming development of all three undeveloped 66-foot-wide Iots and the app1icant~s lot, the neighborhood density would increase to 5.7 people/net acre. 14 persons/net acre is permissible. 3. ' Zoning: R-1, residence district (single dwelling) Public Works Sewer and water are available. jl Attachments 1. Location Mao 2, Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Letter of Request 4. Survey 61 P i taxatr R - F .� R _ .J V) I W g F V R • MI BC GER M MA F MI R 3 ' ri � B � (BC) kR B( .RI F I M� I BC ! I BC M I r _B._ ..d) � F R b • 2 PUl ar F r • F 0 PUD R Lr- z z J 1 W aoao R2 c • R • • PU D F R R • R 2 MI R EDGEHILL R u DEMONT . _.,... F W F cr Q p LBC J N • ' R o Co c R. o �. Q SE X7A N WE Cr MI R W R ' Loc R #rt i M i < _ GRANDviEW A MI M I R , � R TRUNK WAr .. , i >t.F ca r. AJ, ]rr7 LOCATION MAP 6 Attachment 1 FN I t• 87. 71 0 t a • y4 PAR .w • ~_ ,� T Of ' r: ` X20 1 ` • z ' `� oo NUB 0 ROADCASTIN INC. o/ ! . � 5 9 ee S � , t o r * i 1` I oo k I ��� 355 2 3 8' t1:' ' M ' / - , ' ' 1 3 e �J • 9'�.. c o �, ' j 92 6) To MCA c� a + P SI ; 7 0 -' e► ZZ. , •1 t A`. t 2.13 (2 ,,�) ( ;���ac ev Q 77 78 79 80 8 g2 95 b 75 / - 0 IL NO 1 97 /. Applicants site i to to I » 2 ' ■' 6 �O •:: h•'.• { 9 . - ; . „ r� 3' 71 13 : ` . • „ - ,� „ :•. :: 0► (4) Se 0O i ° C • • ' 1i • • 1 �� - . • � .:' . Y 1 ; 1 1 s} r. 110 +5 14 5 12 • ::.:: 58 •::: `70 ris . � 7 t . 70 'fa -fo•t` - - o � 65 (,4 ^ 6 3 . � e2 0 61 G :� 4 to rj X. SF +o I { I � �q I s F• 1281 -NCO H L- q _ o b , t k3i 1389 K . •.•. ++ 33 , �' fib • - _ -- KOHLMAN AV E. 1429 I'M E sc 2 10a t r- _ a two 11i 't �• 1 ' 9 k Z' - c �a j ,o° s 6 ) � ` ' u ' � I - i t h • j ! 1 itl S � 1 7 � � � t i I H Z X21 " 5 e 4 •' .1 0 �. o -ask { { 8 i 9 II 3A 34 35 3G 37 3,5 1 3D 110 4► 42 43 44 4 K 10 O o a .�•.� o ::. :o I ,�� f I C;�) Ic+ 1 cs ►� 1384 1390 I j ry 4 �. 40 w 1 � !SO a k b '•o � � 1 ' .y.. .L�i. �) I � � 1 1 r �. 4 ^ i . �. -t��� �) • tyl r �� - 14 90 5 1 ►• Q I 25k co + 1 I.oeat 416 o , J" 11 •fit > 2 0 18 �? 16 I S; C Q 3 Z ' t .30 -29 28 27 26 2� z4 23 _2 21 9 _ A l - t4 t3 t2 xi �' •LS I ■ 41• �+ s 1 { 1 f y l to 1 �+ / { �wt11�� w.�■ to 1 "� _ v l � � a r � S' 4 ;mss' ''�•: :�� .;w` �.4�; t "s�� a' (>ri f (� - � I �► i ,�1 W SO 2 33 32 H2 tj2 kA�e• 4� .. 6G i,� !. 2 •• • "�t �L' �•, r IT p Lot —width variance or lot division ::�•�'<': Undeveloped 66— foot —wide lots approved by council. (See Past •:<•::: Actions.) PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 /-- Z /- jS" Ray Kruse 1257 WEST COUNTY ROAD 6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631 -0606 RAY KRUSE 854 Palm Court Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Johnson: My mother Mary L. Kruse purchased 1281 Kohlman Ave. in 1932. When I was a child we operated this property as a small farm growing vegatables and raising animals. The neighbors raised pigs, cows and other animals. Obviously the property has no longer any value for this purpose. My mother is presently in Maplewood Care Center and will no longer be able to occupy the property. It is her desire to sell the property before her death. As stated in the accompaning letter from Jack Halverson of Edina Realty, the value of the vacant lot as a building site makes it extremely difficult to sell the proper ty as a package. It will be much easier to market as two items . fly mother has record of attending a Maplewood council i - neeti.ng of Oct. 17, 1968 where she requested that a building permit be issued for lot 15. a Mr. holm mad the motion and it was a Pp rovea and entered into the minutes. She has mentioned this a number of times in her latter years feeling confident she could sell this lot separatly when she needed to. I also agree with 11r. halversons statements that it would only improve the area and utilize the property in a more realistic manner, providing reasonably priced properties for young families. Please give this matter your support and attention. Thank you, 8 Attachment 3 x.19. '88 Ed Re I North Suburban Office INC. 4570 Churchill Street, Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 • (612) 483 -8500 January 18, 1988 Variance or Appeals Application Board City of Maplewood 1830 E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Attn: Randall Johnson AICP Dear Mr. Johnson: I write this letter in hopes that the request for lot split for the current property at 1281 Kohlman Avenue - Maplewood will be approved. The purpose for the split would be to build a new construction single family dwelling for a young family, Donald & Susan Ayers and son, Donald, Jr., 2 years. The current status of the property owned by elderly Mary L. Kruse and managed by her son Ray P. Kruse is a 1926 built 2 bedroom stucco bungalow of 800 sq. ft. on a lot dimension of 132 x 638. The property has been actively marketed for 4 months unsuccessfully at $82 The current status of the property is functionally obsolete. Buyers who can afford 80K price point for a property want more house. The land, which is irregular in dimension poses a limited value at best adjunct with the existing home as farming in this area are of days gone by. Bottom line the value of the land from a building standpoint exceeds the ratio it should for the existing home. This occurred primarily because of the healthy growth and demand Maplewood has as a great metropolitan suburb. This point brings the benefit to the community for this lot split. The .immediate neighborhood, while offering moderate density, has predominently older structures with a few new builds in the 70's -80's range. The Ayer's new house would help elevate and freshen the neighborhood for new growth and young families. As the property sits now, the best functional use for its current owner , Mary L. Kruse, who is elderly and in need of R o REALTORS m, MLS 9 Edina Re alty the sale of the property to subsidize her health care, would be to sell the house on a 66x638 lot for the high $50's and sell the vacant lot (proposed split of 66x638) to.the Ayers. In summary, the proposal for this lot split would be a win -win scenario for all concerned parties. At present the property has not sold due to its obsolescence. This in turn creates a hardship for its current owner and prevents anew family from the opportunity to grow and strengthen the neighborhood. My opinion is based as one of the Top Twin Cities Real Estate Agents for the past 7 years. Sim ely, , ack D. Halver s n Jr.' cc: Ray P. Kruse Denny Aubin JDH /js 10 Edina Realty COMMUNITY SURVEY Question: Can a lot -of- record that is narrower than required by present code be used as a residential building site without obtaining a variance? No 10. CODE REQUIREMENTS 4 Yes 11. Golden Valley I Yes Separate All Setbacks Minimum Width /Area Allowable C Permissible Ownership To Be Met (7 of Standard) Other 1. Apple Valley Yes ► New Hope X X 60 feet (757) 2. Blaine Yes North St. Paul X X Oakdale 3. Brooklyn Center Yes i Plymouth No l i X 40 feet (537) 5.000 square feet (527) 4. Burnsville Yes 1 Yes X South St. Paul 5. Columbia Heights Yes Vadnais Heights Yes 24. 60% 6, Coon Rapids No White Bear Lake Yes 26. Woodbury 7 Cottage Grove Yes X 709 Minimum of 40 feet of frontage on an improved street 8. Crystal i R No 9. Eagan No 10. Fridley 4 Yes 11. Golden Valley I Yes 12. Little Canada No 13. Maple Grove Yes 14. New Brighton No 15. New Hope No i 16. Newport No I 17. North St. Paul Yes 18. Oakdale Yes 19. Plymouth No l i 20. Roseville No 21. Shoreview Yes 22. South St. Paul Yes a 23. Vadnais Heights Yes 24. West St. Paul Yes 25. White Bear Lake Yes 26. Woodbury Yes X 55 feet wide (737) 7,500 square feet (839) X 759 X X 75% X X 709 709 609 Water and sewer stubbed to property line Cannot exceed 309 lot coverage with all roof area Minimum dwelling area must be met 4J a) E U Q r— r-- Plamning Commission -2- Minutes 6-20-$8 ' VI%%~ NEW BUSINESS A Condition 1 Use Permit Renewal and Revision: 1201 Frost n ,=`'"e `^ 8( S A re The staff Commissioner Ca rdin moved the pl ning commission renew the permit for one y ear nd adopt the esolUtion which amends the conditional use permi. at 1201 F st Avenue to sel used cars Approval is subject to (additio are underlined and deletions are crossed out) i n No vehicle shall be is aved for sale until bitUMinOUS p,_-:ivin and stripi-n is -prNv ed for the vehicle sales are-A. A-fter paying _is_p more than two automobiles shall be displa for sale at an e time that Would be visible from Frost A venue. __ No mo t __ an time. ~ '' r ~' ^~~'' ~' -' It --b- the c MMUnit design review board .. Yhal rove the piv 4. No thin fifteen y, unless the COMMU itY design review bo d approves a parking lot with a clo ser s back. 5, Vehicle p rts, are not to be stored UtSiden Commissioner '�empsey seconded Ayes-- ahl , Ayers, �- ' Barrett Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Goins Be Lot Width Variance: 1281 Kohlman (Kruse) The staff report was presented to the commissioners by Randy Johnson, Associate Planner, and discussion followed. k�� that the commission approve the Ray Kruse, the applicant., as lot-width variance or the 1968 variance, and that he not be required to wait +or the approval of a code amendment. Mr. Kruse said he +el t the required findings for approve( of a variance have, in this case, been met. The commission and applicant discussed the history and � dimensicms of other lots in the area. Planning Commission -3- Minutes 6-20-89 The commissioners discussed several considerations of a possible code amendment" Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commAssion table the request for a lot-width variance until eithor findings for a variance are met or a code amendment is ap ' oved which would solve the problems Commissioner Goins seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Barrett, '`Fiola Fi«xcher, ��mpsey' ' ' Goins N.ays--Ayers, Cardinal C. Variances andWaiversV South of Fish Creek (Anderson) Secretar Olson explained the staff rep t on this project. 9/t � Assistant City Engine r Bruce Irish co mented on the financing for the Ramsey/Washing � Watershed '[�trict improvements. David Hans this project, commented on the lot size s and the street construction costs. Mr. in id the proJect would not be feasible with only three l . . Hansing said he did not have grading ��lans and had t t had the preliminary studies done for this project. � � The commission discussed the t sizes which will be proposed in this development, the soil and environmental issues which will impact the area. Commissioner Cardinal move'( theVlanning commission recommend: I. Table the variance d lot request to allow on-site sewage disposal facilit s, rathe than sanitary sewer, south of Fish Creek until: � � A ^ '7 The city ap�� oves a gradi plan for a preliminary '`� Be Submission of an analysis b a qualified expert as to the suitability of each prop for an on-site sewage disposal system. This analysis be based upon the approved grading plan and show th he proposed lot dimensions will be adequate to tr effluent �fluen� frnm each on-site sewage disposal system so as not to have a negative effect on the water quality of Fish Creek, the planned st?rm water pond or pose the threat of aa health hazard +o/ any area resident. MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: City Managaer FROM: Director of Community Development �uoo�aeo-�-~-'�� SUBJFCT: Lincoln Park Seniors' Building Modifie DATE: June 29, 1988 ReJecte ' Dat ' The city c�uncil approved a plan amendment and rezoning for this pro Ject at the last meeting. Council tabled two variances, a request for reduced parking and a conditional use permit unti? Ju 1 y 11. Councilmember Rossbach was to meet with the architect to see if the bui�ding height could be reduced. mb MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner, Randy Johnson SUBJECT: Land Use Amendment (C to RH and RL), Rezoning (R-1 to R-3) , Building Height and Shorel and Density Variances, Authorization for Reduced Parking and a Conditional Use Permit for a Four-Story Buil ding LOCATION: 2280 Stillwater Avenue APPLICANT: Community for Affordable Senior Housing (C.A.S.H.) OWNER: Beaver Lake Lutheran Church PROJECT: Lincoln Park Manor Seniors Residence DATF: April 27, 1988 SUMMARY I . The applicant is proposing to construct an 86-unit multiple dwelling for older adults. This project requires the following approvals: a, A land use plan amendment from C, church, to RH, residential high density, and RL, residential low density. b. Rezoning from R-1, single dwelling, to R-3, multiple dwelling. c. A variance or code amendment to construct a four-story structure that is one story taller than permitted in the shoreland of Beaver Lake. d. A variance or a code amendment to allow 1,520 square feet of area per unit, rather than the 5,000 square feet per unit required in the shoreland of Beaver Lake. e. Approval to allow 111 fewer park1ng spaces (74 open and 37 garage) than generally required for multiple dwellings. f. A conditional use permit to exceed three stories of building he1ght. (Refer to the applicant's letters starting on page 19.) 2. A plat or registered land survey to separate the senior development site from the church property will be applied for once the zoning approvals are granted. A density transfer from the church to the senior project will be required, since the proposed site is too small for the number of units proposed. 3 . Staff is proposing a code amendment (separate report) to waive the shorel and requirements for maximum building height and minimum unit area (items 1 (c) and (d) above) for this and similar sites where the development will have, at best, a negligible impact on a protected water. The applicant would receive fee title to a 1.9 acre site. (Gee page 15.) This area, by itself, iS too small to support the proposed 86-unit building. Beaver Lake Lutheran Church does not want to deed fee title to the applicant for more land but is willing to give them a "density ea ement" for the additional 1.1 acres of site area needed to comply with density re/uirements. The 1.1 acre area is totally encumb` ed by a MnDOT ' rainage easement. The applicant is requesting a plan amendment from C to RHfor the 1.9 acre building site and all of the drainage easement (page 15) except the storm sewer corridor to McKnight Road. This corridor would be changed from C to RL. The church would then transfer the unusable density from the drainage easement to the 1.9 acre building site. Land use plan amendment: This proposed amendment from C to RH and RL use is consistent with the land use transition and housing policies set forth in the comprehensive plan. Building height and minimum-unit area variances: Two findings required to approve a variance cannot be met--a three-story structure instead of the requested four-stor structure would be a reasonable use of the site and the need for the variance would be self-imposed rather than due to a unique circumstance of the site. However, review of this project pointed out that the subJect provisions of the shor~eland ordinance are overly restrictive. This project, at best, will have a negligible effect on the aesthetics or use of Beaver Lake. As such, a code amendment (separate report) is proposed to waive these requirements for proposals such as the applicant's. The variance requests have been addressed in this report to allow the applicant to proceed should council prefer to approve the variance instead of the Proposed code amendment. Parking space reduction: The applicant has agreed to site plan revisions (page 17) which will result in 61 spaces (49 garage and 12 open spaces for visitors) to be initially provided for 86 units. If a lack of visitor spaces is realized, the applicant's plan shows an additional 19 open spaces that could be added for a total of 82 spaces (49 garage and 33 open spaces). � The applicant's initial ratio of .71 parking spaces and potential on-site ratio of .95 spaces for each unit is above the average of .49 spaces for each unit available at 15 similar senior housing projects in the metro area (Refer to page 24.) The .49 spaces for each unit average is based on older projects with predominately open parking rather than garages. The largest demand for parking at a senior housing project generally occurs in the first year or two. After that, the residents age and car demand decreases. There is room to add additional spaces on-site or Joint use of the church parking lot for overflow parking ma y be an option. Conditional use permit,, Code requires a conditional use permit to exceed three stories of building elevation. The applicant contends that the fourth story is necessary to make the project viable. This code is assumed to have been adopted to insure that tall structures were not located too close to single-dwelling structures and to insure that appropriate fire fighting precautions were observed. Since this cod� was adopted in 1968, stricter setback requirement� �ave been adopted to require taller, more massive structures to be set back up to 75 feet from a property line. This structure complies with the requirements. Also, present day uniform building and fire code requirements, which include installment of sprinklers adequately address the public safety issues associated with this type of structure, whereas the city's building code that existed in 1968 did not. From the perspective of land use transitions, this site is well suited to the proposed structure. To the east are three-story apartment buildings~ These buildings will not appear significantly lower than the proposed structure because their first-floor elevation is about ten feet higher. To the south is a ponding area planned for high-density residential use. The closest dwelling to the west would be about 400 feet away. The closest dwelling to the north would be 500± feet away. l . Approve the resolution on page 29 to amend the land use plan from C, church, to RH and RL as shown on page 14. Approval is on the basis that a. Beaver Lake Lutheran Church has declared this area as excess property for church purposes. b. The RH, residential high density designation, is compatible with the existing RH development to the east (Silver Ridge Apartments), the planned RH development to the southeast and the church use to the west and northwest. It 3 C . The RL designation along the McKnight Road frontage would be compatible with the single dwellings across the street. d. The proposed structure would be at least 400 feet from the nearest single dwellings. 2. Approve the resolution on page 30 to rezone the area amended I: o RH, residential high density, from R-1, single-dwelling, to R- 3, mu1tiple dwelling. 3. Approve the resolution of page 34, authorizing -a reduction in parking spaces from 172 to 61 spac` (49 garage spaces and 12 open spaces) initially with an addition�l 19 "fu±ure" open parking spaces that cou7d be provided, if necessary. Approval is on the basis thato a. The proposed parking space to unit ratios of .71 initially and .95 if each of the "future" spaces is constructed, are greater than the averag®r of .49 spaces per unit found among 15 developments outside Maplewood that atL; act residents of a similar age. b. Council has approved a reduced number of parking spaces for each of the previously approved senior residences. c. The code was adopted to regulate apartments designed for families and does not address the reduced parking need for senior housing. Approval is subject to: a. A perpetual , recordable easement for use of the 23 parking spaces on the church's property, adjacent to the seniors project, shall be submitted to the city. This easement shall be recorded against the church property if the city council determines that there is insufficient parking. The easement may be released by the council one year after 95% occupancy of the building or anytime thereafter. If the church parking proves inadequate, or the church refuses to grant an easement, the city council may require the construction of additional on-site parking spaces. b. Any spaces to be used on the church property shall be posted as such c^ Conversion to non-seniors housing shall be prohibited, unless additional land is obtained to comply with density and parking requirements. 4. Deny variances from the shoreland ordinance to allow a four- story building--one story more than allowable by the code and a site density of 1,520 square feet per unit, rather than the 5,000 4 square feet per unit called for by this code. Denial is on the basis that: Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hards'hip because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration because: a. A three-story building, rather than the requested four- story building, would be a reasonable use of the property. b. The plight of the property owner would be self-imposed. 513 Approve the resolution on page 32 to approve a conditional use permit for an indefinite time period to construct a four- story multiple-dwelling structure on the basis that the findings required by code would be met. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed 55 persons who own property within 350 feet of this site. Of the 25 respondents, fourteen are in favor, nine JA re opposed, and two have no comment. Those in favor had the following commentsx 1. I am in favor as long as the building is used for seniors, as ]ong as it exists. Since Silver Ridge was built, we have had a lot of trespassing. Staff comment: This building could not be converted to family housing without enlarging the site to provide more parking and to comply with density requirements. 2. We need senior housing in this area. It will give seniors in this area an opportunity to stay in their neighborhood close to friends, church and relatives. 3. I am in favor, however, I need to know that area residents will be able to afford to live here. From what I've heard its going to be too expensive. I would like some assurance in the way of subsidization for those who qualify. Staff comment: The applicant's goal is to have at least 44 of the 86 units priced to be affordable by low-to-moderate income I The 1987 ceiling for moderate cost rent, including utilities, was $532.50 for a one-bedroom unit. Maxfield Research Group, Inc. has prepared a feasibility study for this project. They found that the following unit mix and rent range could be successful: 5 Source: Maxfield Research Group, Inc. The applicant has stated that some of the units listed in the table will be marketed at lower rents than indicated to make the project affordable to more persons. Section 8 rent subsidy vouchers could also be used by those who qualify. The city cannot impose rent ceilings unless directly involved in the financing, which at this time it is not. Those opposed had the following concerns: 1^ It would lower the property values of the existing homes on McKnight Road." Staff comment: There is no evidence to staff's knowledge, that senior citizen apartments* lower property values of nearby single dwellings. In the recent past, the following senior apartments have been constructed next to or across the street from single dwellings within the city: Concordia Arms (seniors) and Hazel Ridge (seniors). 2" "The units will end up rented half by elderly and half by handicapped or people on welfare. Profiles on television show that seniors and these others do not Staff comment: The applicant is designing the building for occupancy by senior citizens. They are striving to have the rents start at about $500 per month. They do not have a funding source, such as Section B Rent Assistance, to subsidize any person(s) on a monthly basis including seniors. At least two handicap units must be provided to comply with the Uniform Building Code. If state and federal building and financing requirements permit, these units may be rented to non- senior handicap persons if they would otherwise be vacant. 3^ "I don't believe that a variance from the shoreland ordinance should be granted for a four-story building. The building is very large and bulky. Three stories would be adequate." 4. "I am not in favor of any more development of the open space in my neighborhood. I feel this, like the Silver Ridge Apartments, is being shoved down our throats. I am also pro- union and recall the pickets of my fellow brothers protesting M Size Rent Tvoe (S feet) (1987) 34 407. 1 BR 600 - 650 $500 - 525 22 257a 1 BR 700 - 750 525 - 575 17 20% 1 BR/Den/1 Ba 825 - 875 625 - 650 13 15% 2 BR/1-3/4 Ba 950 - 1,000 700 - 72 5 ---' 86 ---' 100% Source: Maxfield Research Group, Inc. The applicant has stated that some of the units listed in the table will be marketed at lower rents than indicated to make the project affordable to more persons. Section 8 rent subsidy vouchers could also be used by those who qualify. The city cannot impose rent ceilings unless directly involved in the financing, which at this time it is not. Those opposed had the following concerns: 1^ It would lower the property values of the existing homes on McKnight Road." Staff comment: There is no evidence to staff's knowledge, that senior citizen apartments* lower property values of nearby single dwellings. In the recent past, the following senior apartments have been constructed next to or across the street from single dwellings within the city: Concordia Arms (seniors) and Hazel Ridge (seniors). 2" "The units will end up rented half by elderly and half by handicapped or people on welfare. Profiles on television show that seniors and these others do not Staff comment: The applicant is designing the building for occupancy by senior citizens. They are striving to have the rents start at about $500 per month. They do not have a funding source, such as Section B Rent Assistance, to subsidize any person(s) on a monthly basis including seniors. At least two handicap units must be provided to comply with the Uniform Building Code. If state and federal building and financing requirements permit, these units may be rented to non- senior handicap persons if they would otherwise be vacant. 3^ "I don't believe that a variance from the shoreland ordinance should be granted for a four-story building. The building is very large and bulky. Three stories would be adequate." 4. "I am not in favor of any more development of the open space in my neighborhood. I feel this, like the Silver Ridge Apartments, is being shoved down our throats. I am also pro- union and recall the pickets of my fellow brothers protesting M that construction by a scab work force. I have nothing against convenient, affordable housing for the elderly, but I fee this proJect would be unfavorable for this neighborhood." Staff comment; The church has declared the easterly portion of their site to be excess property. Neither the city nor the coUnty has plansto buy the high-ground portion of this site for use as park or open space~ An easement has been acquired which will retain the 1.1 acre low area for drainage and open space. A reasonable use of the land must be allowed. 5, "Traffic on Stillwater Road is too heavy now. The driveway proposed to Stillwater Road is at a bad spot and will cause traff1c accidents." Staff comment: Stillwater Avenue is designated as a major arterial roadway and it is a county road. In 1990 a portion of this highway is scheduled to be reconstructed on either side of Lakewood Drive to lower the intersection and add turn lanes. It is currently designed to safely handle an average daily traffic (ADT) count of 7,000+ vehicles. The most recent count showed an POT of 3,600 vehicles. All site distances will conform to design standards and all driveways will have adequate separation between intersections. Dan Soler, the county highway engineer, states that the proposed driveway will have no adverse affect on the safety of this roadway. 6. "This is not affordable senior housing." Staff comment: Refer to the response to Item Four under those in favor. 7. Refer to the attached letter (page 27) from the St. Faul Public Housing Authority. Staff comment: A market study, completed in 1985 by Gary Stout, shows a market demand for senior housing in Maplewood. Several hundred persons are also on the waiting lists for existing facilities. The applicant is not re q uesting financial assistance from the city, therefore, the city has no basis to dictate the type of housing or the rent received. REFERENCE Site Descriptio Gross acreage: 3.39 (Includes .39 acres density credit for underground parking.) Existing easements: MnDOT has acquired a drainage and utility easement that is 1.1 acres in area. (Refer to page 16.) 7 bUrrOUndin Land Uses North: Still water Avenue. Across the street are single dwellings and a water tower. East: The 86 Unit Silver Ridge Apartment complex. South: A 33 parcel of land attached to the Silver Ridge property. This strip of property increases to 66 feet of width at McKnight Road, West: Beaver Creek Lutheran Church grounds zind parking area a nd McKnight Road, Northwest: The edge of the Beaver Lake wetland is 700+ feet from the northwest wall of th Cake e proposed structure Church is located directly between the proposed bui^ Beaver ding and the lake. Past Actions 11 Parking spaces: Parking space variances have been approved as part of planned Unit developments for each of the following senior housing developments: - Early 1970s - Archer Heights 21 spaces for 69 units (.30 spaces/unit) were ere approved. No garages were required. Note: The property owner has expanded the number of open parking spaces to 50 (.73 spaces/unit). In a survey of Archer Heights residents that was conducted in May, 1976 the HRA concluded that: "the types of garags» and parking variances given for this project should not be allowed again. While the elderly might not need one garage and one parking place for each unit, they should include some garages and adequate parking spaces within a reasonable distance of the building. Adequate parking is defined as ample, not only for the needs of the tenants, but also for visitors." 1-30-80 Concordia Arms 100 spaces for 125 unit ( B0 units � were approved. No garages were requi '`eu. unzts are rented. They generally have 60 cars parked on the premise. 4-11-83 Hazel Ridge 75 spaces for 75 units (1.00 spaces/unit) were approved. 55 100� of these spaces are garages. The manager stated that 62 units are rented and there are 25 resident cars. The average resident age is 80. 1-27-86 Casey Lake Development (abandoned) 56 spaces for 52 units (1.08 spaces/unit) were approved. 26 of these spaces were garages. 1-11-88 Cottages of Maplewood 86 spaces for 60 units (1.43 spaces/Unit) were approved. The site plan also showed an additional 33 spaces in front of garages primarily to accommodate guest parking. 42 of the 86 total spaces are to be garages. Note: This development is designed to attract younger and more mobile seniors than the previously approved developments. As such, more parking spaces will be provided. Conditions common to each of the above approvals, except the Archer Heights project, were: 1. "If council determines that there is inadequate on-site parking during its review one year after 957. occupancy, additional parking spaces may be required." 2. Areas shall be designated on the approved site plan for future parking spaces. 1. Land use plan designation: C, church 2. Zoningu R-1, single dwelling 31 Planned density: 34 people/net acre (proposed plan amendment) 4. Proposed density: 33.2 people/net acre 5. Compliance with land use laws: State law: Section 367.10 Subdivision 6 (2) of the state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: It �11 a~ Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as Used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the ' official controls. The plight. of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. City Code: a. Section 36-485 requires four findings for the approval of a rezoning. (Refer to the resolution on page 29.) Variance One b. Section 36-566 (shoreland ordinance) restricts residential development on this site to a maximum of three stories. The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a four-story structure. Variance Two c. Gection 35-566 (c) (3) (e) requires property within a shoreland district, but which does not have lake frontage, to have not more than one dwelling unit for each 5,000 square feet of the site. This proje. t would have one unit for each 1,520 square feet of the site. d. Section 36-22 (a) requires at least two parking spaces; for each multiple dwelling unit, one of which must be enclosed, unless otherwise authorized by the city council. 172 spaces are required for this site, of which 86 must be enclosed. The applicant is proposing a total of 61 parking spaces, 49 of which would be enclosed. e. Section 36-122 (h) states "No R-3 B multiple dwelling (17 units or more in a structure) shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed a height of three stories or 35 feet, whichever is greater, measured from the front or side of such building, 10 unless granted a special use permit by the city council ." The applicant is proposing a four-story,' 45-foot high building. f. Section 36-442 (b) requires ten findings for approval of a conditional use permit. (Refer to the resolution on paqe 32.) in A policy of the HRA is to encourage housing options available to the older adult residents of the community. 2. In October of 1985, Gary Stout of Public Private Ventures prepared a market opinion for the 52-unit Casey Lake Senior proposal (County Road C and White Bear Avenue). Mr. Stout's conclusion was that the demand in Maplewood for senior housing could support "112 new units in 1985 with a demand in the years of 1986 - 1990 for an additional 43.5 units per year." 3. Of Mr. Stout's estimated demand for 330�+ new senior housing units between 1985 and 1990, only 75 units (Hazel Ridge) have been constructed. An additional 60 units (Cottages of Maplewood) are proposed for construction in 1988. 4. In Mr. Stout's market opinion, he also addressed the issue of the appropriate number of parking spaces for a senior ckevelopment: "I recently had the opportunity to review the parking statistics of a large development firm that specializes in senior housing (IDM Corp.) in automobile-oriented southern California. Their experience is that the parking ratios required are about 1 car per unit at opening, which decreases to .5 and then eventually .3 cars per unit when the project "matures". In the average unit at prpJect maturity generally only a widow remains in residence and she tends not to drive. "The experience of local units such as Croixdale (with 41 units and parking demand of 20 to 25 cars, and Sutton Place (with 20 units and parking demand for 8 to 10 cars) tend to bear out those statistics." The survey of the parking spaces available for 15 other area senior housing developments is listed in Attachment 8. An average ratio of parking spaces to units found among the surveyed complexes was .49 parking spaces to each unit. The range was .26 spaces to 1 space per unit. Public W-orks 11 As part of the McKnight Road Realignment Project, the 11 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) acquired the ponding and storm sewer easement shown to the west of the building site (page 17). 2. The city engineer believes that extending city water to the building from Stillwater Avenue, without looping it to McKnigh t Road, may not provide adequate fire flows, particularly for a four-story building. This issue will be further investigated when the utility and grading plans are Submitted~ 3. The proposed building will L-\iith Maplewood's sanitary sewer. require a force main to connect The fire marshal recommends that a second entrance to the garage be provided. In case the drive is blocked, vehicles would have an alternate way to exit. The building, as propose� , com�lies with the Uniform Building Code for pedestrian exiting' fro the garage area. - o~.-.'r-I..~. 1. planning Commission recommendation. 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority recommendation. 3. City Council decision following a public hearing. 4. Approval of the shoreland code variances by the Department of Natural Resources. Ii Attachments I . Land Use Plan (existing) 2. Land Use Plan (proposed) 3. Property Line/Zoning Map (existing) 4. Proposed Zoning Map 5. Site Plan 6. North elevation relative to church 7. Applicant's letter of justification 8. Parking space survey 9. Letter from St. Paul Public Housing Authority 10. Resolution (land use plan) 11. Resolution (rezoning) � 12. Resolution (CUP) 13. Resolution (parking space reduction) 12 cc an W Y i Maryland Ave. in � ow Stillwater Road 0 - l,,....., Harvester A SC A . 0 A 0 S C Minnehaha Conway LAND USE PLAN (Beaver Lake Neighborhood) (Existing) 13 Attachment 1 . m IF 1 _ W � I 1.1 mum ° Maryland Ave. � Stillwater Road Sc ���••..., Harvester A A A e CO S c Minnehaha i� Conway Bearer Lake NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAII (Proposed) _. 14 Attachment 2 I o ze . 24 :.,L . 1;6 7. b — ,L 38+� 2 Q0' 12 61 T 5 �,,,., 4 o 0 ell - - - - - 1 30 ` ASt AVE; — 02648.4 N1 � 5 ?� 103.0 �' (n. f3 13 dD. 13 153.3 153.31 3.3 89 101.9 121.35 1013 aT -t 34 F + 0 AT tit � � v t Ln 1 0 = S4 N 020 Q1 r 3 _ V o k,:5 LA ul _40 Aj + + I''! N 6 0 30) V . 5 2 a� 0 a� _ 3) # / ll _ �9 04t I D O� L� 7O p j p 0 2 0 0 1 O t 2+ (2 Z) LA �r�1 5(o J 5� s S S5 / C ? ! > 20 oa o1� " 0 A .2 � += Z� °° 10 Water Tower A .0- ' ` 2 , n , t. r e m � � ��► 0 o� coop Ar 0 Ad - i 1 oP� V irS$. 24 * 30 }�- _ 1 -518 (3-75 •) O/ o r (4- ? Beaver Lake Gj A , Rid A artments LAKE 'TH. CH � Silver Rid p �• Lutheran Church N i�- % l CO t ' •.:.. :: .• •: . CD 4t; WAR a � 30 - ` 4 !)o / O 42 0 ''.1 l 0 in 5 Lf) I i 4 Undeveloped Land 5 . co ( +3) 2 43 L Density Transfer to Lincoln Park Manor Site (1.1 Acres). All but the ditch corridor to McKnight 'would be rezoned from R -1 to R -3 R -1 to R -3 rezoning AAt the request of the applicant but not part of Lincoln Park Manor Site) PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP (Existing) 15 Attachment 3 o Lincoln Park Manor Fee ownership (1.9 Acres) v� ��►_ 4 N nA �us rn .J 3 3� •3 Z _ _ 2 ibo , 652.2 R I t ' L OO 0 _ •. O, 2048.4 M � , 3 3� 'o,•►j b. t3 1346. 153.3 � t 53.31 3.3 89 to 1.9 # 3� u+ 4) 13' , � 109. s • � o �b cA v ( ^O <2� -^ ( 1 N c effWEF� 4 N � t \ ap S in C6 S + _ Q N -,./ I (� eZ0 0 V w t! . fj ` 0 � ♦ � '� Q .� 101.9' -- 12 ♦ t N S 3 52 r olo U V 2.7- 2d A Al C7 0 oj0 4 92 q oto 56 5 . if .23ra � A to j BEY Q 5 art. Q cit of 5t• P" ' 1Q � t .23.& � per. r- `� � 0 � '• :.� . t 1� O t .4 • Z4. 3O i 3 ► .e Of • ; � tv A .� Cu 4 i a ` rr 1 Del ✓ j ( � o m I 'V: g 0 Gbb�c,: 30 N 33 - ► 2 s - VAc 3 t .SoaLc . 13 . 044 .98ac 4 1t^ i C. E . Ne! son 043 -- 00 oc 0o ;n dOMW ... r 2.3S ac. ro (4-3) 4 Aw /3 0 5 t 3� 00 2 5 4 4 56.3!0 1 261 1.00 AC. v PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Q (Proposed) N 16 Attachment 4 1 L . ti .•�•, 1 `•� ♦ J _fi ;'�.` ."r"�� �.. - 3 '��.•..�� �r'�.- • .f"' .. M� . E w �" 777 AN E w • 1'. J I ! rf f J• �.�•'"' ✓��� > •w,•~ � •'s S�T., . ..••.• vr. • f age 4P AO -1 • • -- ' r �~' i 1 ' ° 1 "''�• , ' , Driveway to be moved 2' . to ' the east f �•'•.�........ �• w. _ njV • \ Provide 24 feet of • widt fior ,� C .1 -- •= r.-.,� • •• all driveways. dP • I / � •r+ ; i VA ,'r a �. • •.; r• ,;; • =: ;: �,, - Nine 9 -foot spaces to be ten , 1 ��� •' Beaver Lake Lutheran Church !� G �� 10 -foot spaces 1 '• 1 M lE +,�- � -mil - - - - -_4 . �.� •_ .-� — .. ._.. f `� t`, � j A • 4r , 1. fir" ' - cam• _ y IL t YY I �•• Three 9 -foot spaces to be three 10 -foot spaces • • i �` r • ` , -�• ;• , Actual building site t 1 �' > �• �, •. _ � 0.9 acres) , '-7 :„ Replace all 9- foot -wide spaces 1.1 acre drainage easement. =��= .. -with 10 -foot -wide spaces • Density credit to be transferred ; / '�" r Yr z Proposed for a land use -z �, .. /.}.- , ..1 i= to the building site, '�`��r..• � { •, % '�1 ��-- �� p lan amendment to RL. `.� ' , • %. 1 '\ `'.: v :• �J' =•':' - ;•r•! i ` - •'"'•, '� •; '` ` 1 1 ' t c :. - ' Replace nine - foot - wide spaces =(�: V •. `� "� iCC� -� •.� / - - r with eight 10 -foot -wide spaces -� 1 • 70 •1 . = . that meet setback _requirements. �" � • � r .• - .... - • • ` � ♦ 1 • • ° ° J�. � I t � • � ♦ � J � - 1. s r �• I I Se`3'1+6{8_W '`� ` �° °• `�" • 1 � ' ~• ~_ L�° <<,` • �!\; { ♦ �.•.r��- t." - -r • 4 ,gyp I ��•• W ` • \ \�' 1 � , s� 19 1II1 416 ••• %;` \ � =r {{ • • °•�° - Revised Parking Space Mix • • 32 ten and 12- foot -wide spaces 52% •• 29 nine - foot -wide spaces 48% ' • ' • ' • w 1 LINCOLN PARK MANOR SITE PLAN (The indicated revisions will be shown on the final site plan to be reviewed by the 't community design review board.) ATTACHMENT 5 (1� 17 �o owl SILVI RIDGE _APTS. . _ LINCOLN PARK MANOR c+ c+ n C t- 5b w /Fiu icyArchiteM ky. Yl`''• � Sum ".No � �� q-«-� _LINCOLN ..P:ARK__MA_NOR,... m� __Nt_ILi IVIIO M/NNtf07/1 "- r fLN /�rt�i 00VO /n0 I - BEAVER LAKE LUTHERAN CHURCH __... SITE SECTION — ELEVA11ON ATTACHMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION This application requests a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a tract of land now owned by Beaver Lake Lutheran Church. The land is comprised of two adjacent parcels: Parcel A contains 1.9 acres of land that Beaver Lake Lutheran Church will sell to the COMMUNITY for AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING ( "C.A.S.H. ") . Parcel B contains 1.1 acres of land. The Church plans to deliver to C.A.S.H. legal control of this parcel through a perpetual easement or a 99 -year lease or such other mechanism as the City and its attorneys find acceptable. y The subject property will be developed to provide much - needed affordable rental housing for elderly residents of the Beaver Lake area of Maplewood. The development (to be known as Lincoln Park Manor) will be operated on a non - profit basis and will offer an appropriate housing alternative for lower- and moderate - income senior citizens whose housing needs are not now bein g served adequately. The proposed use of the property meets the HRA's published objective No. 4 for 1987, which states (in part) that the HRA shall "encourage and facilitate the provision of life -cycle housing, and continue to work toward the establishment of alternative housing options for the city's older -adult population. of In addition, we understand that the subject property was designated for Church use in the Comprehensive Plan because of the property's ownership b a Church ert use not by a desire to restrict the property's y P P y s to a Church facility. PROJECT INITIATION, SPONSORSHIP and OWNERSHIP The concept of Lincoln Park Manor was initiated by senior citizens of the Beaver Lake area who want to remain in the neighborhood but whose housing eeds are not now being served adequately. In res on g response to the concerns expressed by their senior members, five churches in the neighborhood joined together and J g created the COMMUNITY for AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING. C.A.S.H. is in effect a coalition of the five neighborhood churches (Beaver Lake Lutheran Church, Geth- semane Lutheran Church, Holy Cross Lutheran Church, St. Thomas the Apostle Catholic Church and Transfiguration Catholic Church). P The COMMUNITY for AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING is the sponsor/developer of Lincoln Park Manor and will be the project's owner. By owning the development, C.A.S.H. will be able to ensure: 19 Attachment 7 - the long -run affordability of the project for lower- and moderate- income seniors; --- the provision of management and supportive services that are a PP ro- priate to meet the needs of elderly residents; and the continuing maintenance of the development as a safe, secure and responsive housing environment for senior citiens. C.A.S.H.'s ownership of the project is expected to be er etual. Because P P se Lincoln Park Manor will be operated on a non- profit basis, rent increases will occur only in response to actual increases in the costs of operating nd main- taining the development and in serving he changing g g anging needs of residents. The rent schedule will not include any profit to be paid to the owner. LOCATION and NEED There is no other housing in the Beaver Lake area (or elsewhere in the "le "'of Maplewood) that is designed to meet the needs of senior "'of citiens. By providing housing that is appropriate and affordable to lower- and moderate-income seniors, Lincoln Park Manor will enable long -term residents of the Beaver Lake area to remain in their community. In response to a mail survey conducted among elderly members of five churches in the Beaver Lake area, 243 senior citizens indicated an interest st in a housing alternative in their community that would be designed to meet their needs. HOUSING ENVIRONMENT In addition to quality housing, Lincoln Park Manor will provide sensitive and responsive management, social and supportive services designed to ensure e a healthful, independent - living environment. Residents will be offered responsive p save services that will enable them to maintain independent lifestyles for as long a period of time as possible. Y g A wide range of intellectual, social, cultural and. community experiences w' Y P i11 be offered to residents. Emphasis will be placed on activities that are r p oduc- tive and utilize the experiences and expertise of the elderly. Y Services may include nutritional counseling, a telephone reassurance ro ram programs and other counseling in- building meals for residents, educational e eling services. In addition, the COMMUNITY for AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING is committed to developing a large volunteer program involving churches of all denominations and other community groups. Opportunities for the elderly to serve as v olun- teers will also be pursued. - 2 - 20 RELIGIOUS SUPPORT Each of the five member- churches of C.AoSoH. intends to maintain a long-term commitment to Lincoln Park Manor. Each church appoints two members to the board of directors of C.A.S.Ho and plans to provide supportive services o PP t residents. By pooling their efforts and resources through C.A.S.H., the five churches will be able to offer residents a higher degree of supportive services than is t yP i- cally available at projects of this size. Being in daily contact with elderly residents of the Beaver Lake area, the five churches are in a unique positio n to be able to identify and address appropriately the needs of senior citizens in their community. SUMMARY Lincoln Park Manor will provide an appropriate housing alternative for senior citizens of Maplewood. It will enable long -term residents of the Beaver Lake area to remain in their neighborhood, which is now "under- served �� compared to other areas of the Ci The development's ownership and operation on a non- profit basis will ensure its continuing operation as a housing opportunity hat is affordable - y e to lower and moderate- income people. Lincoln Park Manor will be a high- quality project that will be an asset to the City of Maplewood and a credit to all those who artici ate in P p its development. i mm 21 ATTACHMENT to VARIANCE APPLICATION This application requests a variance for height so that Lincoln Park Manor can be four stories tall, rather than three stories as required by the zoning g 1. Our primary purpose in requesting this variance is to increase the number of people who can be served by Lincoln Park Manor -- people whose housing needs are not now being served adequately. Without the variance, Lincoln Park Manor would contain 63 dwelling units; with the variance, 86 dwelling units can be constructed. An intense market study performed by the Maxfield Research Group indicates that there is a current demand for 231 additional housing units for senior citizens. The requested variance would allow the construction of four floors of dwelling units rather than three. This would enable us to serve an additional 23 senior households who can live more independently in ap- propriate housing than they can in their single family homes. The larger number of dwelling units would also enable us to provide manage- ment of the property in a manner that is more appropriate for meeting the needs of senior citizens. For example, the economies of scale of the larger building would enable us to hire a full -time manager for the building rather than a part -time staff person. The need for the requested variance is generated by the requirement that 1.1 of the 3.0 acres that will comprise Lincoln Park Manor must be main - tained as open space. This requirement is unique to the subject property. The Minnesota Department of Transportation ("MNDOT"') owns a "ponding ease- ment" across the 1.1 acres which prevents any structures from bein g placed on this acreage. If the MNDOT easement did not exist, the "footprint" of Lincoln Park Manor could readily be increased to accommodate 86 dwelling units in a 3 -story structure. Because the MNDOT easement does exist, how ever, 86 dwelling units can only be built on the 3.0 acres if the structure is allowed to contain four stories of dwelling units rather than three. 2. We believe the requested variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The building will have a "pitched" roof, the peak of which would be 36 feet above ground level. The roof will not substantially increase the "massing" of the building because its slope diminishes the effect of the height of the roof. With a pitched roof, the eye tends to travel to the eave line, not to the peak of the roof. 22 By contrast, the three -story Silver Ridge Apartments are situated on an adjacent tract of land that is substantially higher than the subject pro - perty. Although the flat roof on the Silver Ridge Apartments will be rough ly 17 feet below the peak of Lincoln Park Manor's roof, the Silver Ridge roof will be approximately 2 feet lower than the eave line on the four- story Lincoln Park Manor. In addition, the peak of the roof of the proposed building would be about 17 feet higher than the roof peak of the adjacent Beaver Lake Lutheran Church but approximately 15 feet lower than the steeple on the Church. From both Stillwater Avenue and McKnight Road, Lincoln Park Manor should give the impression of being shorter than the Church and insignificantly taller than the Silver Ridge Apartments. Please also note that, as a neighborhood -based organization, we are particular- ly concerned that Lincoln Park Manor fit well into our community. We intend to snake every effort to assure ourselves (as well as our neighbors) that Lincoln Park Manor will be compatible with the surrounding structures. - 2 - 23 Units Percentage Per Acre Parking Stories 7 Bloomington Elderly Housing 82nd St. & Knox Ave. So. Bloomington Mn. 4.69 acres r a! 212 units 134 spaces, surface 45 63% 15 8. Brooklyn Park Elderly 74th & Zane Ave. No. Brooklyn Park Mn. 1.58 acres 110 units 46 spaces, surface 70 42% 7 9. Boardwalk Central Ave. & Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata Mn. 77 units 1.789 acres 38 spaces, surface 43 49% 4 10. Dover Hill 2500 Rhode Island Ave. No. Golden Valley Mn. 234 total units of which 122 are Elderly Total 14.8 acres includin acres ( including 3 acres a a on lake) Elderly portion less than 1/3 of site - less than 5 acres 74 spaces, surface & garage, for Elderly 24 61%* 7 *Parking utilization less than 50% of spaces available 11. Fridley Apartments Mississippi & 7th St. NE Fridley Mn." 9.8 acres - Elderly portion less than 1/3 of site - less than 3.3 acres 49 spaces, surface, for Elderly 31 48%- 5 12. Coventry 2800 North Snelling Ave. Roseville Mn. 195 total units of which 103 are Elderly 5 stories 8 acres - Elderly portion less than 1/3 of site - less than 3 acres 49 spaces, surface for elderly 34 48/ 5 25 II . FEDERALLY FINANCED & ASSISTED DEVELOPMENTS 13. Hopkins Village Apartments 9 Seventy Ave. So. Hopkins Mn. 166 total units - 907.+ are Elderly 11 stories 1.65 acres 166 spaces, surface *Less than 25% of Elderly tenants have cars. 14. Hamilton House 2400 Nevada Avenue So. St. Louis Park, Mn. 110 units 2.5 acres 29 spaces, surface *90% of parking spaces utilized - parking suf ficient 15. Yorktown Continental Apartments 7151 York Ave. So. Edina, Mn. 264 units Approximately 6 acres 120 spaces, 112 surface & 8 garages *Approximately 80% of parking spaces utilized. Average Median Units Per Acre 101 44 approx. 44 Percentage Parking 100 %* 26%* 45%* 49% 47 %' Stories 11 4 12 26 F o; PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL PHA 350 Gilbert Building . 413 Wacouta Street • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 •Phone 1612) 298 -5668 December 23, 1987 Geoff Olson, Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Lincoln Park Manor Dear Mr. Olson: Because the Public Housing Agency of the City of Saint Paul (PHA) owns property near the Beaver Lake Lutheran Church site, we received your December 3 letter about the proposed Lincoln Park Manor. I am writin�to sh are th vi ews- on ne w subs houG for the e lderly . Based on our extensive experience housing the same population, we question the need for additional subsidized housing for low income elderly in Saint Paul and surrounding communities. However, there clearly is a need for housing specifically designed for persons who are not capable of living independently, with on -site congregate social and medical services provided. The PHA owns 2 units of low rent public housing for the elderly in 16 hi- rise buildings scattered throughout Saint Paul. The last two hi -rises were constructed in 1976. Since then HUD and the City of Saint Paul have approved development of 834 units of Section 202 elderly housing, units which carry identical eligibility requirements and rents as our public housing apartments. Many similar developments have also been constructed in suburban ' communi ties in the last 10 -15 years, We have voiced the PHA' s concerns frequently during that period; and our position is well known by the staff at the Department of Housing and Urban Development Area Office The PHA' s hi -rises offer quality housing at affordable rents to Saint Paul's low income elderly. However, the buildings are older and we cannot compare with each new development which offers amenities which we cannot. It has been necessary for the PHA to engage in extensive marketing efforts over the past few years jus to attract elderly to the PHA waiting list. An approved elderly applicant for publi� housing may have to wait only 30 -60 days for an offer of a unit today, a far Ery from the 1 -5 year waiting list that existed when these units were constructed. We sought and received HUD's authorization to admit single persons who are not elderly or disabled to some "elderly" hi- rises. Also, since 1984 an increasing number of non- elderly handicapped /disabled applicants have been housed in the PHA's hi -rises as required by HUD. 27 Attachment 9 Geoff Olson, Director of Community Development December 22, 1987 Page 2 ' The PHA suggests that the City of Maplewood ive careful eful consideration to future proposals for subsidized housing for the elderly that come before you Statistics from the Saint Paul Department of Planning indicate. - ears � g a��i economic Development that the "62 y f age and older" in Saint Paul will be gradually decreasing between now and the year 2010. y What's more, the data indicate that those same elderly persons will be better off financially in th coming years and will likely have more housing alternatives y e g a tive s than exist today, Tax dollars for low income housing hould f g be used to meet the needs of large non-elderly f amilies who require three, four and five bedroom units has suspended taking applications for four The PHA ur and five bedroom dwelling units because these is no expectation of our being ble t g o house applicants within a reasonable period of time In fact, families in these bedroom categories ma face a wait of 3 -10 years before receiving n offer y g r of an available unit. ,!mother underserved group is that of the elderly nd require . special housing design y younger persons who g g and extensive supportive services to live outside of medical institutions. We understand that the Communi ty ' for Affordable Housing has not yet applied for any subsidies for the Lincoln Park Manor, but that it could still do so. If no subsidy is involved, presumably market forces and construction costs will require Lincoln Park Manor to target t a different population than that served by public housing and other subsidized projects. Never er an � Nevertheless, we encourage the developer d the City of Maplewood to look for ways to meet what as the most critical needs: large u the PHA sees designed g nits for non - elderly families' specially housing with supportive services to serve frail elder y 1 handicapped persons. y and Sincerely, n M. Gutzma Executive Director FAH:bwe cc:File:Route(DD:ARH):FAH W PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Community for Affordable Senior Housing (C A �� H > initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from " " church, to RH residential v for the undeveloped land on the o" t/' � west sides of the Beaver Lake Lutheran Church property. This property is more commonly described as 2280 Stillwater Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 11 The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 2 1988 to consider this plan amendment. Notice there of was published and mailed pursuant to law. w a All persons present at said hearing were given ''' ven an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The planning commission recommended to the c it // that said plan amendment be y council 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on , 1988. The council considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Beaver Lake Lutheran Church has declared this area as excess property for church purposes. 2. The RH, residential high density designation is compatible with the existing RH development to the e (Silver Ridge Apartments) the planned RH development to the southea t d the ' west and northwest, , an e church use to the 3. The RL designation along the McKnight Road frontage would be compatible with the single dwellings across the street. 4. The proposed structure would be at least 400 feet from the nearest single dwellings. Adopted this day of , 19884 Seconded b 29 Attachment 10 REZONING RESOLUTION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Community for Affordable Senior Housing (C.A.S.H.) initiated a rezoning from R-1, single dwelling to R-3 multiple dwelling for the following-described property: (Legal description to be filled in once an RLS or plat description is available. The area to be rezoned is shown on page 16.) WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances~ 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said rezoning be . 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1988 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and the comprehensive plan. 2^ The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded" 3^ The proposed change will serve the best interests and ' conveniences of the community, and the public welfare because additional senior housing opportunities will be provided, for which a 30 Attachment 11 4~ The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical , efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. ' ' Adopted this day of , 19888 ' Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS, ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1988 with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as' such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988. City Clerk City of Maplewood 31 Conditional Use Permit Resolution Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Community for Affordable Senior Housing initiated a conditional use permit to build a four-story senior building at the following-described property: (Legal to be determined.) WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 11 This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 2 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on , 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city stL and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings-of-fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3^ The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 32 Attachment 12 / 50 The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 60 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties~ 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 91 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Adopted this day of , 19880 Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1988, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988. ' City Clerk City of Maplewood 33 PARKING RESOLUTION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the 27th Clay of June, 1988 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Community for Affordable Senior Housing has requested a reduction of required parking from 172 to 61 spaces (49 garage spaces and 12 open spaces) at the following-described property: (Legal description to be filled in after a plat or RLS is prepared.) WHEREAS, the procedural history of this request is as follows: 1. This request was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 2, 1988. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said request be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 27, 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the above-described request be following findings-of -fact: THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT on the basis of the a. The proposed parking space to unit ratios of ~71 initially and .95 if each of the "future" spaces is constructed, are greater than the average of .49 spaces per unit found among 15 developments outside Maplewood that attract residents of a similar age. b. Council has approved a reduced number of parking spaces for each of the previously approved senior residences. c. The code was adopted to regulate apartments designed for families and does not address the reduced parking need for senior housing. 34 Attachment 13 Approval is subject to: a. A perpetual , recordable easement for use of the 23 parking spaces on the church's property, adjacent to the seniors project, shall be submitted to the city. Thio» eaeement shall be recorded against the church property if the city counc:il determines that there is insufficient parking. The easement may be released by the council one year after 95% occupancy of the building or anytime thereafter. If the church parking proves inadequate, or the church refuses to grant an easement, the city council may require the construction of additional on-site parking spaces. b^ Any spaces to be used on the church property shall be posted aS.; such. c. Conversion to non-seniors housing shall be prohibited, unless additional land is obtained to comply with density and parking requirements. Adopted this day of v 1988. Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of m1nutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 198 , with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full , true and complete transcript insofar as the same relates to a parking space reduction. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 1988. City Clerk City of Maplewood 35 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY R OAD B, MAP.EWOOD, MINNESOTA MAY 2 1988 I. II. III~ IV, CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axda `1, called the meeti� g to order at 7:30 p.m. � ROLL CALL \ Commissioner � Lest Axdahl . Present Commissioner Michael Ayers Present Commio //' Richar Barrett, ' resent Commissioner Robert 'Cardi ' Present Commi ss ioner Frank Dempsey Present Commissioner Sue Fiol` '' Absent Commissioner Lorraine F i scher Present Commissioner Albert Goins Absent Commissioner Dennis Present Commissioner Marvin Sig ` ndik Absent Commissioner Ralph ' Sletten '. ` Present ' ' \ APPROVAL OF MINUTES ` APPROVAL OF AGENDA � \ / Commis r \ Fischer moved z-App of the agenda, as amended adding It em 8-C, Resolution of `Aopreciation. � ' Comm i��ioner Gletten seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2280 Stillwater Ave. (Lincoln Park Seniors Residence) PI an Amendment Rezoning Height Variance Area/Dwelling Variance Conditional Use Permit Parking Space Reduction . . The staff report was presented and discussed by the commissioners. Mary H lund of Community for Affordable Senior Housing qave a presentation and background information on the proposal . Harry Olson, architect, gave a description of the project. Muffie Gabler of Westminster Management gave background information and experience in management. Planning Comm iss;ion Minutes 5-2-88 -2- Joe Boland, Vice President of Community for Affordable Senior Housing, addressed the concerns of the number of units, building'height and economics of the project. He saidbuilding height is lower than buildings to the east, yet has more stories because of the difference in elevations. Charlie Killich asked about the drainage area. Ed Flauten asked about the rental rates and what would be included in the rates. Bill Robbins, a neighbor, spoke in opposition to the project. He said he was in favor of three stories, instead of four. Several other people spoke in favor of the proposed housing. ' Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend: I. Approval of the resolution to amend the land use plan from C, church, to RH and RL. Approval is on the basis that: a. Beaver Lake Lutheran Church has declared this area as excess property for church purposes. b. The RH, residential high density designatinn, is compatible with the exisLing RH development to the east (Silver Ridge Apartments), the planned RH development to the southeast and the church use to the west and c. The RL designation along the McKnight Road frontage would be compatible with the single dwellings across the street. d. The proposed structure would be at 7east 400 feet from the nearest single dwellings. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend: 2. Approval of the resolution to rezone the area amended to RH, residential high density, from R-1, single dwelling, to R- 3, multiple dwelling. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischt*r, Larson, Sletten Planning Commission -3- Minutes 5-2-88 Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend: 3. Authorization of a reduction in parking spaces from 172 to 61 spaces (49 garage spaces and 12 open spaces) init with an additional 19 "future" open parking spaces that could be provided, if necessary. Approval is on the basis that: a. The proposed parking space to unit ratios of .71 initially and .95 if each of the "future" spaces is constructed, are greater than the average of .49 spaces � per un^t found among 15 developments outside Maplewood that attract residents of a similar age. b. Council has approved a reduced number of parking spaces for each of the previously approved senior residences. - c. The code was adopted to regulate apartments designed for families and does not address the reduced parking need for senior housing. Approval is subject to: a. A perpetual, recordable easement for use of �3 parking spaces on the church's property, adjacent to the seniors project, shall be submitted to the city. This easement shall be recorded against the church property if the city council determines that there is insufficient parking. The easement may be released by the council one year after 95% occupancy of the building or anytime thereafter. If the church parking proves inadequate, or the church refuses to grant an easement, the city council may require the construction of additional on-site parking spaces. b, Any spaces to be used on the church property shall be posted as such. c. Conversion to non-seniors housing shall be prohibited, unless additional land is obtained to comply with density and parking requirements. Commissioner Barrett seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten Commissioner Ayers moved the planning commission recommend: ^ 4. Denial of the variances from the shorel and ordinance P1 an n i n Commission -4- Minut es 5-2-88 to allow a foUr-story building-_one story more than allowable by the code and a site density of 1,520 squar feet per unit, ratheim than the 5,000 square feet per unit called for by this code. Denial is on the basis that: Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances uni to the property under consideration because: an A three-story building, rather than the requested four-story building, would be a reasonable ' use of the property. b. The plight of the property owner would be self- imposed. Commissioner Dempsey seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten The parking space reduction item was tabled until after Item VIII-A. VIII. NEW BUSINESS �~ .` A. Code Ameridgient : Shoreland Overlay District The staff report �as e�p.ained and discussed with the commissioners. .` Commissioner Fischer moved the planning commission recommend approval of the ordinance to exempt nonwater frontage developments that would not be visible from the lake from the height and density l imitat�ions . ' \ ~` Commis r Larson seconded `` Ayes--Barrett, Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten Nays--Axdahl v Ayers, Cardinal V. PUBLIC H ARINGS a. 2280 Stillwater Ave. (Lincoln Park Seniors Residence) Parking Space Reduction Commissioner Cardinal moved the planning recommend: Planning Commission Minutes 5-2-88 -5- 5. Approval of the resolution to approve a conditional use permit for an indefinite time period to'construct a four-story multiple-dwelling structure on the basis that the findings required by code would be met, if the shoreland overlay district amendment is approved by city council. Commissioner Fischer seconded Viiia NEW BUSINESS Ayes--Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten Nays--Axdahl , Ayers Be Conditional Use Permit: Gervais Ave~ (MnDOT) Dick Sullivan ca d Blaine Himmelmann were present at the meeting representing +h pplicant. Background information was presented and th�« answered qLWstioned about the facility. ` Commissioner Card o Yd e planning commission recommend ^ adoption of the re i proving a conditional use permit for the proposed l to nd research center. Approval is based on the findin req d by code and subject to the following conditions� 11 Adherence to the e plan, date-stamped 1988, unless a change is approved by Ve city's community design review board. 2. A building permi all not be issued until the city has ordered the constructYor of Gervais Avenue. 3. There shall be o od rs or noises from this site that are detectable at the e st pr erty line other than those normally associated. with th�� ingres�� and egress of trucks and cars. Commissioner SletYen secondkd C. Resolutiony of Appreciati Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten - George Rossbach Commissioner moved the ning commission recommend approval of ee r�solut�om of a ciation for George s on the planni g commissio n Rossbach's Commissioner Larson seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, Sletten // - C2 Acti b Coun 4 Mod 1-ti '~ _a TO City Manager FROM: Randy Johnson, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Code Amendment--Shoreland Overlay District APPLICANT: Committee for Affordable Senior Housing (CASH) DATE: April 27 1988 The applicant is requesting an amendment'to the shor n elad ordinance to exempt nonwater-frontage developments that would not be visible from the lake from the height and density limitations. The �pplicant is proposing to construct a four-story 86-unit apartment building for senior citizens. (Separate report.) This building would be significantly screened from view from Beaver Lake by Beaver Lake Lutheran Church. The applicant had initially applied for variances from each of the subJect requirements. Although the intent of the sho�eland code can be complied with, the state law findings for a variance cannot be met. The requested code amendment is theonly alternative to proceed with proposed four-story building. r.~~..+- Maximum bui7ding height: A building- height limitation is imposed on shoreland developmen� to insure that the natural beauty of a protected water is not compromised. The �roposed code would waive this requirement where a structure would be at least 80% screened from view from a public water. Molly Comeau, from the De part m=nt of Natural Resources (DNR) concurs that this amendment is Justifiable. Minimum area per unit: This reqUirement is imposed primarily to safeguard against overuse of a public water. Its intent is to minimize the number` of persons that would gain access to a lake through private docking facilities. The second purpose of this requirement is to insure an appropriate amount of open space on each development site as viewed from the protected water. The proposed amendment would waive this requirement for non lake-frontage developments that would not have private docking facilities and which meet open space requirements. Recommendation (At-least four votes re for I approval.) A.pprove the attached ordinance. REFERENCE 1. Planning commission recommendation 2. City council first reading' and public hearing 3. City council second reading and adoption 4. DNR approval jl Proposed ordinance It 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING REDUCTIONS IN SHORELAND DISTRICT STANDARDS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (language underlined is added): Section 1. Section 36-566 (J) is amended as follows: (j) Reduction in development standards: (1] Where a shoreland property is: (a) separated from all protected waters by a principal or major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan, (b) the area does not drain directly to a protected water, and (c) the visual impact of the area from the lake surface is minimal , all applicable development standards may be reduced in restrictiveness by one protected waters classification. (i.e., Property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II development standards.) Section 36-5?6'-)6 Q:)) and (c) shall not -acco to structUres that WOUld be at ' . least _ v iew from at least 80% of the (3) 1%linifflUM area--per-Unit rpa in Section 36-566 L l y to devel-onments that are at least 80% Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed b the Maplewood City Council on , 198893 Mayor Attest: � City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- � Planning Commission MinUtes 5-2-88 -4- al I owabl e b fie code azin a site densit of 1 - called for b his cod ~°. De//^a» is on cn : Strict en+orceme of the code would not cause undue hardship because cirCUff1stanceS uniqus to the property under dbecause: H t ree-s building, rather than the re d +Our tory building, would be a reasonable of Lt the prop rty. b. he plight the property owner would be self- imo��sed. \ Commi ioner Dempsey se onded 'Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fischer, � \ Larson, Sletten h e parking space reductio em was tabled until after / VIII-A. � \ VIII. NEW BUSINESS ` A' Code Amendment: Shore] and Overlay District The staff report was explained and discussed with t��e commissioners. Commissioner Fischer moved the plannin� commission recommend approval of the shoreland ordin�nce to exempt non water fron�age developments that would not be visible from the lake from the height and density limitations. Commissioner Larson seconded Ayes--Barrett, Dempsey, Fischer, Larson, S|etten Nays--Axdahl, Ayers, Cardinal V. PUBLIC HEARINGS ck . 2280 Still Ave. (Lincoln Park Seniors Residence) Parkin Space Reduction , ��` " Commissioner Cardin moved the planning commission recommend: • p S � r r fL r 7 � f � r .l TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: ELATE: Intr odUCt ion MEMORANDUM 3 Action by C 0'1,1,L'a,o iI Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date e Ci Manager Thomas Ekstrand , Associate Planner Appeal of Design Review Board Condition 2168 White Bear Avenue Sam McGee Fina Oil and Chemical Company F i n smart Jane 22, 1988 SUMMARY The applicant is appealing the design review board's requirement that the westerl y curb cut on County Road 8 be cl osed . (Refer to the applicant's 1 e tt er on page 3 a) Back ground On. May 24 1988 , the board conditionally a pproved plans for the new Finamart fuel station/convenience store. Condition number ten required that "the ex isting westerl y' drive on County Road 8 shal be omitted. The proposed easterly driveway along County Road B shall be relocated - to the .•.est to line up with the Hostess Thrift Store's driveway." Refer to the map on page 5 . El i sc us s i on (driveway access) For traffic safety, staff would prefer to have the two curb cuts nearest the intersection closed. This would be a recommendation for approval i+ the entire site was to be redeveloped. S the pump islands are to remain in their present location, however , staff does not feel the applicant should be required to close both access points. . .In an attempt, though, to lessen traffic congestion at the intersection, the westerly curb cut on County Road P should be eliminated. The proposed easterly curb cut, -furthermore, should be relocated to the west to l i n e LIP with the entrance to the Hostess Thrift Store on th South side of County Road B. As proposed, this easterly driveway aims directly at the dwelling at 1800 County Road 8 which would cause a headlight glare probi em. Recommendation Take no action. Sta -finds no reason to revise the board's decision, based an the reasons g iven in the staff reports k d Attachments in Location Map 2m Propert Line/Zoning Map 3m Site Plan 4s Applicant's Letter Dated June 1,, 1988 5 m Review Board Motion Dated Ma ' 44, 1988 9 O Af 4 9AW/ ar SAM y,4Kt FIELD v z LAKE i W.P) r6 4) AV r 0 6%Av z J Us Cc x own& Ck: NORTH SA IN r PA UL low%L /%*, - LOCATION MAP '� Q 3 Attachment 1 .. u,& A A If I (I dft 10 12 1 PRIVA rE srgrrr AV (MTSSAOI AV) NORTH SAINr PAUL 74 _� amw tQ; L•' 1 • ••1 ' i s o 1vnc � r �• i LARK ' M dw • p 016 C 2 C Z ( 31) Az A-Ilk LAUR os3 • so � U i t t 1 3 �9. $41-L-4% -AMe 4� 4� Y1� I tp o �- Z •'s � - - - - - - - i - -•• • ' Uj m • 2200 (34) / ,rte ... -; • 4 1 0 ..� i�? 7 S . • • • • 41M 4w w t • SANDHUR;ST 11 �s 4 a 40mo 41) .� ;• - 4ft.i i .....::.: ' •... '' ��� t� 3 r 1 Qi• 2 30 Ir t > �O • lot ............... 74 -_ - - 3 .. Div:. •'�' �:�:- '' :�' ;�;:; � ..... 0 M S ��. 21 ti•: .J:. -- --coin ALMPW ROAD— Z •� IQ - wj Ful k Manuf actur i ng •; • - IGO 1800 Cz1 . lot 10 to Hostess Thrift , Store l r AM • a ' i •• ,....... cool + PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP n 0 4 Attachment 2 • W Q CC Q W m W 1— 2 3 O h h • JC4UAW • 1 2�" fiO4oJP"F-* �/(D (a) 4400 Proposed Driveway Relocation COUNTY RD. '6' . SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 3 AOP 4 N �1 � �j Fins Oil and Chemical FINA Com P.O. Box 2159 Dallas, Texas 75221 (214) 750 -2400 June 1, 1988 Mr. Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood MN. 1830 County Road Maplewood, MN. 55109 .Dear Mr. Ekstrand: Fina would like to request an appeal of the decision -made on 5/24/88 by the Community Design Review Board. F ina would like to further discuss item #10 on the list of requirements, concerning the west access on county roadw We feel a great need to maintain this access for maximum circulation and would like the city council to review this request. Fina intends to comply with all other listed requirements as passed by the Community Design Review Board. Please inform me of the earliest date available for city council agenda. Sincerely, Sam G. McGee Architect SGM:gh It Attachment 4 • . Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes 5 -24 -88 200 The exterior building colors shall be submitted to staff for approval and shall be earth tones to avoid bright or contrasting col ors . Board Member Erickson seconded Ayes --al 1 vie DESIGN REVIEW A. Plan Review - F i n amar t 2168 White Pear Avenue Sam McGee was present at the meeting representing the a p p l i c a n t s Mrs McGee said he was not in agreement with Item 10 of the staff recommendation regarding omitting one driveway on County Road B and relocating another dr iveway. Board Member Deans moved approval of plans date - stamped May 10 1988, for the new Finamart facility at 2168 White Bear Avenue subject to: 1. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 2e All trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the b u i l d i n g s Enclosures. shat 1 be protected by concrete -f i 1 1 ed steel P � osts or the equivalent anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. If th enclosure is masonr Y, the protect posts may be omitted. 3. The roof -top equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view as proposed. 4. An erosion control plan acceptable to the city engineer shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a b u i l d i n g permit for erosion control during constructions 5 s Parking a reas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 60 If construction has not begun within , two years of approval . , board review shall be repeated 70 Site lighting shal 1 be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue gl are onto adjacent properties or roadways. 7 Attachment 5 • 8 . The fascia on the southeasterly side of the b u i l d i n g • shall not be illuminated if a glare problem results for the residents south of County Road B. 919 The fascia material on both buildings shall be applied to all sides of the structures* 10. The existing westerly drive on County Road B shall be omitted. The proposed easterly driveway along County Road B shat 1 be relocated to. the west to 1 ine up with the Hostess Thrift Store's driveway., 11 . The app 1 i cant shat 1 obtain permits f rom Ramsey County for the new curb cut on County Road B and for c 1 os i ng the existing access. 12. Screening shall be provided to block headlight glare north of the seven parking spaces and north of the entrance into the car wash as shown in the staff report . The screening shall be subject to staff approval. 13 . An address shat 1 be cl earl y posted on the bui 1 d i ng , subject to the approval of the fire marshal. 14. Any work performed involving the fuel tanks shall comply with local and state laws and be subject to the fire marshal 's approval, 15. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant, 16. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the city engineer's approval, 17. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained, 18. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owners within one year. 19. Ref 1 ectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided, 20. Al l' pub 1 is boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded . 21,o The applicant shall provide a monetary' guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff in the amount of 150.0 of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. 22, S ignage is not part of this approval* . Board Member Kochs i ek seconded Ayes - -&l 1 8 p 1 1 June 22, 1988 MEMORANDUM To: Director of Community Development Geoff Olson From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. CollinsJ co. Subject: Accidents — County Road B and White Bear Avenue A review of our files i ndi cates that from January 1, 1987, through June 12, 1988. there were 14 accidents at County Road B and White Bear Avenue. Of the 14 accidents. 2 involved persons actually entering or leaving the gas station on the northeast corner of that intersection. Approximately 6 of the remaining 12 accidents were attributed to other vehicles entering or leaving the gas station at this location but who were not actually involved in the collision. There is an increased volume of traffic on County Road B. Based on t h i s increased traffic the potential is much greater.for accidents with vehicles pulling in and out of the Fina station located on the northeast corner of County Road B and White Bear Avenue. Because of this potential, I would recommend that the curb cut on County Road B entering the Fi na gas station be moved farther east to help eliminate the potential hazard of vehicles entering or exiting this station. KVC: j It n Pak �j Ac by Council Endorse 'Modif i e Rejecte Date GARDEN CIEWER 612-m739=8314 831 CENTURY AVE. NO. SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA 55119 June 20, 1988 Mr. Jeff Olson; I would like to be put on the agenda for the council meeting of Monday, June 27th., to clarify what storage is in regards to the special use permit at 831 N. Century Ave., St. Paul, Mn.. The reason for this discussion is because of a complaint from Ery Dryer and the subsequent letter sent by the Maplewood Staff. We firmly believe storage should be defined as any item or vehicle left in one place for two weeks or more. We do have used parking area, not parking spaces to.outfit our R,V's for the trip we are about to take. I would also like to have defined at this meeting the compromise worked out in regards to the fence between our south neighbor, and Dege Garden Center. I believe the councils decision -was 80% bused on the trees and fencing between the two properties. I do not want to be put in the position of taking down the $10,000.00 building and having my neighbor bring the fence situation up after it is down, and.then not have the backing of the council. I would like this compromise agreed upon before the garage comes down. I apologize for having to take this back to you again, but apparently the neighbor is always looking for fine points for further harassement . Thank you in advance for your cooperation. LAWN and GARDEN CENTER George S. Dege — Ge0WER'S SUPPLIES CITY • MAPLEWOOD I I r 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612 -770 -4560 June 20, 1988 Mr. George Dege 2636 Harvester Avenue Maplewood, MN 55119 RE: DEGE GARDEN CENTER This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation that the RV vehicle in the Dege Garden Center parking lot will be removed. The conditional use permit states that: 1. The parking lot may only be used for parking for the garden center building. 2. No portion of this site or parking lot shall be used for truck or trailer storage. The city council will consider the request in your June 20 letter on June 27. The meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. r GE F OLSON, AICP — DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT kd TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Director.of Community Development Garbage Houses July 5, 1988 Actioft by oun-0,11f E dorsed ModifI Rejecte Dat Councilmember Bastian asked for a report on "garbage houses ". A report is attached. RECOMMENDATION Take no action. MEMORANDUM TO: Director of Community Development FROM: Environmental Health Official REV Garbage Houses ses DATE: June 22, 1988 The recent incidents with the garbage houses in St. Paul have called attention to a reoccurring problem fo~cities. These situations are not common, but we do see them occasionally and there are, no doubt others that we do not know about. The most common outward symptoms of these places are reoccurring nuisance complaints, messy yards, a severely deteriorating house, and all windows in the house totally covered. We investigate these situations when we receive a complaint or report from another official such as police, fire, welfare, or another reliable person who has seen the interior of the house. The first step after receiving a report is to visit the house and ask to look inside to see if e problem does exist. If we are denied entry, we would have probable cause to obtain a search warrant. If the owner of such a house would not voluntarily clean out the garbage, we do have the option of contracting the work and assessing the cost to the owner (with court order). The housing department for the City of St. Paul handles these situations in about the same way, except that they make an effort to get into houses where there is only suspicion of a problem. If they do not have grounds for obtaining a search warrant, other methods are used to get ca look at the inside of the house. As I previously indicated, we have only been investigating places where we have direct knowledge of a problem. To go beyond this, as does St. Paul, poses the philosophical question of where you draw the Iine between the privacy of an individual 's home and public health concerns. At what point do we knock on someone~s door and ask to inspect the house? % recommend that we maintain the current policy' kd T .T ,.. ,- 2 M J. LEVITT JOHN B. VAN DE NORTH, JR. T.A OFFICES ROBERT E. WOODS COLE OEHLER RI C HARD G. MARK WILLIAM J. JOANIS ROBERT M. BOwEN ROBERT G. SHARE AxD RE w C. SELDEN ANDREW C BEcim BRIGGS AND M O R G A N MARGARET K. S AVAGE BURT E. SWANSON JEFFREY J. KE YES . JOHN K. ELLINOBOE BRIAN G. BELISLE M.J. GALvI JR. JAMES E. NELSON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION TONY STEMBEROER DAVID C. FORSBERG JEROME A. GEIS MARY E. SCHAFFNER JOHN J. MCNEELY STEVE A. BRAND MICHAEL H. STREAT'HR MCNEIL V. SITYMOUR, JR. JOEL H. GOTTESMAN JOHN 11. LINDSTROM JERRY F. ROTMAN KA R1.N L . W ILLE 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANH BUILDING R 1cHARD D..AN DF.RlCON TRRmNOE N. DOYLE ALAN 11. MACLIN SALLY A. S( 000IN R ICHARD H. KYLE JOHN L. DEvNEY JEFFREY F. SHAW MATTHEW L. LE VITY SAINT PAUL. , MINNESOTA 155101 DAVID C. MCDONALD BRUCE w MooTY RONALD L. SO RENSON DAVID G. GR EENING ANDREw R. KINTZINOER PETER .H. SEED DAVID B. SAND FREDERICK P. ANGST SAMUEL L. HAN SON JOSEPH P. NOACH TELEPHONE 1612) 291-1215 ROBERT L. LEE RoNALD E. ORC HARD CHAR LES R. HAYNOR ANN HUNTRODS JOHN TROYER ANDREA M. BOND GREGORY J. STENMOR STEPHEN WDM CH TIMOTHY P. F LAHERTY TELECOPI ER 812) 222 - 4071 CHARLES B. ROGERS AVRON L. GORDON MARTIN H. FISH TERRY L. SLYE JOHN R. KE NEFICH ROBERT J. PRATTE MA UREEN E. WARREN THOMAS A. LARSON JOHN BULTENA MARY M' DYRSETH DAV ID J . SPENCER JAMES G. RAY PATRICK M. GARRY DANIEL J. COLE, JR. DouoLSs L. SKoR RICHARD H. MARTIN TRUDY J. HALLS FORMER FIRM OF TIMOTHY E. MA MICHAEL H. JERONIMUS MARY L. IPPEL LEVITT� PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE CHERYL CHERYL A. T HOMAS KEVI A. BERG R. SCOTT DAVIES JAMES A. VOSE MARK SCHROEDER J. PA TRICK. MCDAVITT ROBYN L. HAN M. B RIom McDoxovoH July 6, 1988 Action by Council: En dorsed.. M odified Mr. Geoff Olson ..�.a. Planning Director ReJec'ec City Hall dal® 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: City of Maplewood, MN - Cottages Lifestyle, Inc. Project Dear Geoff: MICHAEL J. GRIMES MARIAN M. DURHIN CHRISTOPHER C. CLEVELAND NANCY A ARNIsoN MICHAEL J. MCELLISTRZK LAUREN A. FITHIAN PAUL S.JACOBSEN CO LLEEN V. SHORT DIANA J. V ANCE -BRYAN NRAL 'r. 13URT11C SUSAN B. THOMAS TIMOTHY J. KEENAN ROBERT L. STERUP MICHAEL THOMAS MILLER CARLOS R. CARRASQUILLO KRISTIN S. MELBY ELENA. L. OsTBY KEvIx J. HINIKER RUTH J. KELMAN VINCENT A. THOMAS MARK J. F RENZ NANCY J. WOLF DENNIS L. HALL ANDREA M. MA CHMEIER PATRICK. T. S HELLY DIANE B. LITTLE OF COUNSEL J. NEIL MORTON RICHARD E. KYLE JOHN M. PALMER SAMUEI. H. MORUAN FRANK N. GRAHAM A. LAURENCE DAVIS CLARENCE G. FRAME FRANK HAM MOND LEONARD J. KEYES JOHN M. SULLIVAN The City is expecting to receive a Community Development Block Grant from Ramsey County in.. the amount of $252,500. The grant will be used by the City to provide the developer (Cottages Lifestyle, Inc.) money to purchase the real property on which a senior housing project will be constructed. The'HUD requirements and the agreement to be entered into between Ramsey County and the City provide that the City, upon demand of HUD, must repay HUD the $252,500 if the project is not constructed and* 51% of the units not leased for a five -year period to tenants with income levels required by HUD. The City will not provide the $252,500 to the developer until the construction and long -term financing are in place and all conditions precedent to the disbursement of construction loan funds have been satisfied. City staff, the. City's bond counsel and fiscal consultant met with- representatives of the developer on Friday to discuss with them the Community Development Block Grant financing. The representatives of the City indicated to the developer that a letter of credit in the amount of $252,500 must be delivered by the developer to the City which would be returned when construction of the project is complete and 51% of the project leased to tenants with income levels required by HUD. Presumably, 2270 MN WORLD TRADE CENTER 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 2400 IDS CENTER SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 58402 (912) 241-1215 (812) 281-1215 (912) 339-0661 BRIGGS Aawx� MORGAN Mr. Geoff Olson July 6, 19 8 8 Page Two 'the project: will. be - constructed and ceased because the developer s;.'ob wining construction :financing and has obtained a market study indicating that the project is viableS However, there still is risk to the City until the project is in fact constructed and initially leased. Therefore, because the City can be required by HUD to pay back the grant, it was thought that the City should be in a secured position. Because the construction of the project has been proceeding slower than initially represented by the developer, the amount of the tax increment bonds has been reduced because the amount of capitalized interest has been reduced. Attached is a recent bond schedule prepared by Miller & Schroeder. The payback period has been increased from 2.7 years to 4.3 because the tax increments are presently anticipated to be lower than originally anticipated. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippel MLl:jms:090 VIA MESSENGER City of Maplewood, Minnesota General Obligation Taxable Tax Increment Bonds of 1988 Issue /Settle: 10/1/88 1st Coupon: 2/1/89 as =: a -.asxs :.- ca= =aza =asa = =a = =acaaz= mesa= s= asters= ar rraaamassa s =aaase =sasseaaaaaassaae= seas== a= as sa =ss_ax == z =_asa =srsssa =sa =sasa D/S INCREMENT ESTIMATED DEBT TAX INCR. DATE COL. 'YEAR PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST SERVICE AVAILABLE COVERAGE = =�;_ =� �. a = = = =� sa:= :acs asaazes:s:ssaaa = = =sts:assas:sa: sa= aaa== aa===3 zzsa= sagas: =s.._= = = = =sz =ris=er= =rite =a==aa = seer =asserts: =nun 2/ 1/89 1:0 1,0, 528.33 2/ 1/90 31,.585.00 3 t ; 585.00 2/,1/91 '1990 25, 000.00 8.500% 31' 56 68 ;.000.00 120.1173% 2/ 1/92 1991 35,000.00 8.700% 29 64,460.00 :80 124.108% 2/ 1/93 1992 35,000.00 8.900% 26,415.00 61,415.00 80 130.261% 2/ 1/94 1993 40 9.100% 23,300.00 63 80 126.382% 2/ 1/95 1994 45,000.00 9.200% 19,660.00 64,660.00 80,000.00 123.724% 2/ 1/96 1995 50 9.300% 15,520.00 65,520.00 80 122.100% 2/ 1/97 1996 55 9.400% 10,870._00 65,870.00 80 121.451% 2/ �wwwwwwwwww 1/98 1997 wrwwww�w rwwrwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 60,000.00 9.500% wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 5,700.00 65 80 121.766% w w w w w w w www wwwwwww ww ww www ww ww w www w w ww w www 345,000.00 wwww wwwwww ww wwwww ww wwww www w w www 204 wwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwww ww w w w w w w w w w w 549 rwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww�w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ww 628 ww w w w .� w ww w w ww w Total Bond Years Gross Interest Cost Average Coupon NET INTEREST COST TRUE INTEREST COST Average Life Discount 2 1.96% 2,210.00 204,623.33 9.289% 9.565% 9.672% 6.41 years 6,762.00 Par Amount of Bonds LESS: Discount a 1.96% 345,000.00 t 6,762.00) assss =s:s:s = =sc =s: 338,238.00 NOTE: 1990 Increment pays 8/1/90 interest and 2/1/91 principal & interest, etc. Total Sources of Funds Project Costs Issuance Costs Capitalized Interest Balance Totat Uses of Funds 275,000.00 20,000.00 42,113.33 1,124.67 338,238.00 Prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financiat, Inc. Financial Consulting Department: 6129/1988 y • C1. 11095 TX4to,@� e5 w1a,300 55344 July 5, 1988 To The Honorable Mayor John Greavu and City Council Persons. Norman Anderson Gary Bastian Fran Juker George Rossbach RE: Cottages of Maplewood, Minnesota It appears that we are at long last about to be in a position to start construction on this most meritorious project. During the process that led to the agreement reached regarding the development criteria, it was agreed that the need for this project in the Maplewood Community is strong. Since that time, our assumptions have been substantially bolstered by the tremendous market response that we have received from only two ads in the St. Paul Dispatch newspaper. We have 73 people who have already put their name, on a list indicating a strong interest in renting, 19 of whom have put down a reservation deposit of $100. And this is prior to having the Mayor even turn the first shovel full of d irt. Both the formal market study and the appraisal have shown strong support for the project. The market study indicated a need for only 1% market penetration for success for this endeavor, wherein the Stillwater project, done by Arkell Development Corporation, needed a 3% penetration. As we know, that project (124 units) is doing very well on occupancy. When we add the benefits of serving the needs of those citizens most responsible for the solid and steady growth of this community to the improved tax base and the opening up of many homes in the area to young families with children, there 'is, no question but that this project meets the criteria set forth to determine eligibility for tax increment and grant assistance. However,. even with. that. tremendous potential, assembling the financial package f or the project has been a very_ dif f icult undertaking . As you. know, due to problems. l experienced by the , previous. developer, I took the project over :recently . to :add the. f i:nancial - strength necessary to complete , the financing . ' To insure continuity for the.project, I hired the development team that has successfully completed 196 Cottages units. We have been successful in assembling the financing package for the project. The financial requirements of that package are very difficult and have caused our credit limits to be stretched to the limit for this type of an endeavor. 0 page two Just recently, the Maplewood City Attorney advised us that we would also have to acquire an- additional letter of credit in the amount of $252,000 to give the city , additional comfort that the project will, in f act, be completed and be :occupied by qualifying tenants so'the - terms of the Community Deve lopment Block ..Grant will be met as specified. We ` ! that your. attorney and city staf f members- would like to see :the c t Y - rot.ec�ted :in the most s:ecur:e manner. possible. . However , this put us in a P very ` difficult .position as it puts us past. the credit limits for this project. Further, we are of the opinion that the city is well protected by the structure of the financing and agreement covenants that were set up in our previous meetings with you. First, we have solid financing commitments from 1st National Bank of Anoka for construction financing, and from Juran & Moody, Inc., for long -term permanent financing. Second, prior to construction, firm prices will be secured from reputable contractors by the well respected construction management company, Bossardt Christianson, Inc. All contractors will be required to post a.per- formance bond insuring the full completion of the project for the stated price. Third, Ms. Judy Karon, Director of Community and Economic Development at Ramsey County has told us that our projected rents are well below the levels required for compliance* Finally, even if some "glitch" can overcome the above safeguards and happened to allow the project to not be completed (something that has never happened in many successfu y y P ears of m development experience) , the strong market will attract other developers to step in and take over. With the covenants that are in P lace, another developer would have to comply with the same requirements that we would, which would satisfy the requirements of the CDB Grant and, therefore, eliminate any negative exposure for the City of Maplewood.. In summary, we can appreciate the concerns of your attorney and staff members. However, we feel that you are more than adequately protected against the possibilities of financial problems by the above referenced safeguards. Further, as much as we want to proceed with this very meritorious project, we will be. unable to do so if this extra financial burden is placed upon us. We are hopeful that you will agree with us in the near future as time limits on our financial and land option commitments will be expiring soon. If you have any questions, please contact me at any time. Sincerely, COTTAGES.LIFESTYLEt INC. Ot "Frederick J. Schwartz :vs cc: Mr. Bill Bissonett Mr. J. Patrick Brinkman Mr. John Campbell Mr. Dwight Harvey Mr, Jerry Hertel AGENDA AGENDA REPORT TO: Ma and Councilmembers FROM: Cit Mana RE: East Communities Famil Center DATE: Jul 6, 1988 Action b GQunoil ; Endorse Modifi ReJected,-, Date Councilmember Gar Bastian announced his resi from t he Board of the East Commun,iti.es Famil Center at the last City Council Meetin The Council s-hould appoint another member to serve. on this board, MAM: 1 nb AGENDA T 7 '" AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager ation by ouncil: FROM: Assistant City .Engineer gUBJECT McKnight Road, Phase 2 City Project ect 87--04 Endorse Schedule Public Hearing Modifie DATE July 5, 1988 Rai eete Date The feasibility report for the subject improvement is hereby transmitted . The attached resol ut ion schedules a publ is hearing for August 8, 19889 is RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING .WHEREAS, the cit engineer for the Cit of Maplewood has been authorized and .directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of McKnight Road between Larpenteur Avenue .and Hollowa Avenue, Cit Project 87-04 b construction of street with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, utilit reconstruction and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said cit engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW,, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: lot The report of the cit engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on McKnight Road between Larpenteur Avenue and Hollowa Avenue, Cit Project 87-04 b construction of street with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, utilit reconstruction and appurtenan is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereb received. 2a The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited propert for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $73,752.63. 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the cit hal I at 1830 East Count Road B on Monda the 8th da of August,, 1988, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The cit clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as re b law. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT - Action by CouncJllv TO: Cit Manager FROM: Assistant Cit Engineer Endorsed.- SUBJECT: Ferndale Street Storm Sewer, Project 87-20 Modif i ed Approve Plans Re DATE: Jul 5. 1988 Date_-, The plans for the subject project are complete . -The are recommended for approval b the cit engineer. The attached resolution authorizes advertisement for bids. dc RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed b the cit council on . Ma 23, 1988, p I ans and spec i f i cat i on f or Fern dal e Street Storm Sewer, Project 87-20, have been prepared under the direction o f the cit engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to th council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA: in Such plans and specifications, a cop of which are attached hereto and jade a part hereof , are hereb approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the cit clerk. 2 . The cit clerk shal 1 prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten da before the date set for bid opening, shall specif the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicl opened and considered b the council at 9:30 a.mi, on the 5th da of August, 1988, at the cit hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied b a certified check or bid bond, pa to the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3a The cit clerk and cit engineer are hereb authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. AGENDA ITEM .r— 4 TO: Cit Manager FROM: Assistant Cit SUBJECT: Sterling Street Approve Plans DATE: Jul 5, 1988 INTRODUCTION AGENDA REPORT Engineer Water Main Project 87•45 Action b Counoil:if Endorsed.. Modified Re ecterl Date The plans and specifications for the construction of water main from the existing southerl termination of Sterling Street to the elevated tank site at Hill wood Drive and associated grading are complete and are recommended for approval b the cit engineer. A resolUtion is attached to authorized advertisement for bids. BACKGROUND The proposed project is a part of the Water District G/Sterling Street, Schaller Drive improvements. Due to difficult in securing right-of-wa and construction easements from the propert owner north of Highwood Avenue, it is not possible to initiate construction of the entire Sterling Street, Schaller Drive project at this time. However, contracts have been awarded for construction of the Water District 8 elevated tank and ,associated Mail and .Road pumping station modifications. To enable the .Water District 8 improvements to become functional b the completion dates re for the ongoing construction contracts, it is necessar to begin construction of the water 'main that connects the new elevated tank to the existing high pressure one water distribution s at this time. The majorit of proposed improvements on Sterling Street and Schaller Drive will be included under a subse contract after re propert ac has been completed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. i c Attachment RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, plans and specifications for grading / and water main to the elevated tank on Sterl ing Street, Project 81-45, have been prepared under the direction .of the cit engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval,, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: in Such. plans and specifications, a cop of which are attached hereto and made a part h are hereb approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the cit clerk. 2. The cit clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and sp I ecifications. The advertisement shall be published twice., at least ten da before the date set for bid opening, shall specif the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicl opened and considered b the council at -9 a.m., on the 5th da of August,, 1988, at the cit hal I and that no bids shat I be considered unl ess seal ed and f i I ed with the c erg: and accompanied b a certified check or bid bond, pa to the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid 3a The cit clerk and cit engineer are hereb authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a c at the regular cit council meeting of August 8, 1988 a Action by Council, Endorsed , . 0 . 0 Modifier-1--_ Rejected Data AGENDA ITEM MEMORANDUM TO: Cit Manager FROM: Assistant Cit Engineer SUBJECT: McKnight Road Between Conwa Avenue and 1200 Feet North of Stillwater Road--Approval of Preliminar Plans DATE: Jul 5, 19138 INTRODUCTION Ramse Count has re Maplewood to give formal approval to the preliminar plans for the referenced project . A resolution of approval of the plans is a prere for review b MnDOT funding our BACKGROUND The plans for McKnight Road between Conwa Avenue and 1200 feet north of Stillwater Road, Cit Project 87-05, have been prepared b Ramse Count with input from the Maplewood Department of Public Works., RECOMMENDATION I The plans have been reviewed b the engineering department and are hereb recommended for approval, i c RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLANS WHEREAS, Ramse Count has prepared plans for reconstruction of McKnight Road within Maplewood from Conwa Avenue to 1200 feet north of Stillwater Road, WHEREAS, the cit engineer has reviewed such plans and presents said plans to the council for approval., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: The preliminar plans for reconstruction of McKnight Road from Conwa Avenue to 1200 feet north of Stillwater Road, State Project 62-668-26, Cit Project 87-05, are approved. This approval is independent of proposed cooperative agreements for the construction of this project, Agenda Number -- AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan DATE: June 21, 1988 4 Action by Council: E nd o r s e d..,... Modified.... Re j ected...aw"wmmw Date The five -year Capital Improvement P l a n is a 1 anni n tool for City staff and p 9 elected officials. It contains major capital outlay and improvement projects for the period of 1989 -1993. Projects included for 1989 are planned to be included in the 1989 Capital Budget for the City. The new CIP is designed to replace the 1980 -1985 CIP within the Comprehensive Plan. Since the CIP is part of the Comprehensive Plan it requires four votes for adoption. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the five -year Capital Improvement Plan at its June 6th meeting. DFF /ch