Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 05-12 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 12, 1986 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 86 -11 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL IC) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting 86 -10, April 28, 1986 (D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Accounts Payable 2. Time Extension - Hazel Ridge Planned Unit 'Development 34 Change' Location - Spark Liquor 4. Ripley Avenue Water Main (E-A) COMMISSIQN APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Design Review Board (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 16 7:00 - Code Amendment - Motor Fuel Sales 2. 7:00 - BC(M) District Motor Fuel Sales (4 Vote): i 3. 7:10 Conditional Use Permit: Southlawn & Beam (G) AWARD OF BIDS 16 Diseased Tree Removal (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Reconsideration - Code Amendment: Parking (4 Votes) (I ) NEW BUSINESS 1. 1985 Annual Financial Report & Audit ,2. Tax Forfeited Properties 3. Metro East Study 4. Service District No. 6 - Trunk Water Main & Tower .5. City -- Hal 1 Change Order No. 2 69 Century Avenue 7. Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce Proposal for i Economic Development Promotional Program (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS � K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS CM) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 28, 1986 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 86 -10 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 86 -09 (April 14, 1986) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 86. 9 (April 14 1986) as submitted Seconded by Councilmember Juker. . Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended 1. Meeting with Building Inspector 2. New City Hall Opening 3. Reconsideration 4. Letter from Mr. Behr 50 Reconsideration 6. Police Training Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Consent Agenda Item E -4 to become New Business I -16. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1 through 3 and 5 through 8 as recommended Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all, except Councilmember Bastian voted "Nay" on Item 2. 1. Accounts Payable Approved the accounts (Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses Check register dated April 16 through April 18, 1986, $744,517.15: Part II - Payroll dated April 18, 1986 in the gross amount $132,922.05.) in'the amount of $877,439.20. 4/28 2 2. Budget Transfer - Insurance Consultant Approved a budget transfer of $1,560 from the Contingency Account in the General Fund to cover the additional cost to the insurance consultant Cor- porate Risk Managers, In,c. , contract. 3. Investment Authorization Resolution No. 86 - 4 - 62 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Vanguard Fixed Income Securities Fund G.N.M.A. Portfolio is hereby authorized for investment of City monies, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that monies in the above fund may be withdrawn and wire transferred to any other official depository of the City by request of the City Treasurer or Finance Director. 4. Selection of Insurance Agent Discussed under Item I -16. 5. Revenue Bonds - Hazel Ridge Elderly Project Resolution No. 86 - 4 - 63 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE TO THE INDENTURE OF TRUST RELATING TO THE $4 , 395, 000 RENTAL HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (HAZEL RIDGE ELDERLY PROJECT) WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") issued its $4,395,000 Rental Housing Revenue Bonds (Hazel Ridge Elderly Project) pursuant to an Indenture of Trust between the City and First Trust Com- pany, Inc. (the "Trustee ") dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Indenture") and a Loan Agreement dated December 1, 1985 between the City and Hazel Ridge General Partnership ( the "Company ") ( the "Loan Agreement ") ; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Indenture the rate of interest on the Bonds shall be converted on May 1, 1986 (the "Conversion Date ") from the initial rate to a fixed interest rate to remain in effect until December 1, 2000; WHEREAS,, the Indenture currently requires the Company to deliver to Juran & Moody.. Inc. ( the "Remarketing Agent ") and the Trustee prior to the Conversion Date, a mortgage, assignment of rents, disbursing agreement, declaration of restrictions and covenants, and a title insurance policy; WHEREAS, the Company desires to add additional partners or change its composition in ways which will provide security for the Bonds and in a manner which was not contemplated on the date of issuance of the Bonds and therefore the Company has requested that delivery of the security documents required prior to the Conversion Date be postponed to such time as the com- position of the Company and the complete security package for the Bonds has been determined; -_ 2 - 4/28 WHEREAS, the Company shall not be entitled to withdraw any of the pro - ceeds of the Bonds from the Construction Fund until such time as such se- curity documents have been delivered in form and substance satisfactory to the Remarketing Agent; WHEREAS, the City has agreed to amend the Indenture to permit the secur- ity documents currently required by the Indenture to. be delivered at a later date. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Maplewood as follows: 1. The proposed form of First Supplemental Indenture is hereby approved in substantially the form submitted and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the First Supplemental Indenture in the name of and on behalf of the City along with such other.documents as bond counsel considers appropriate in connection therewith upon approval of all documentation by the City Attorney. 2. All other terms and provisions of the Indenture shall remain in full force and effect except as modified by First Supple- mental Indenture. Adopted April 28, 1986. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Its Mayor By Its City Clerk 6. Budget Amendment - Compost Site Monitor Approved to increase account 01- 4020 -74 in the environmental health budget by $2,860 and increase the corresponding revenue account by the same amount to cover the hiring of a part -time site monitor for the corpost site. 7. Final Plat - Budd Kolby Addition Approved the Budd Kolby Addition. final plat. 8. Building Consultant Fee Increase Approved the increase of the fee rate for the building consultants from $20.00 per hour to $22.00 per hour. E -A COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS 1. Planning Commission Appointment a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. - 3 - 4/28 b. Ms. Mary Susan Fiola was introduced to the Council. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to appoint Mary Susan F ola to the Planning Commission Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Park Commission Appointment (Richard Bennett) . a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. b. Mr.'Richard Bennett was introduced to the Council. c. Councilmember Anderson moved to appoint Richard Bennett to the Parks and Recreation Commission Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., McKnight Road Reconstruction Project 81 -20 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed construction of street, storm sewer, pathway, sanitary sewer and water main improvements on McKnight Road from 400 feet north of Larpenteur Avenue to Beaver Lake. b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. c. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the improvement. d. Mr. Wayne Leonard, Ramsey County Program Coordinator, explained the County's proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Paul G. Honi, 1600 McKnight Road Ms. Dorothy Otto, 1897 No. McKnight Road f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 86 - 4 - 64. WHEREAS,, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of street, storm sewer, pathway, sanitary sewer and water main im- provements on McKnight Road from 400 feet north of Larpenteur Avenue to Beaver Lake, City Project 81 -20, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on April 28, 1986, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; - 4 - 4/28 r NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct street, storm sewer, pathway, sanitary sewer and water main improvements on McKnight Road from 400 feet north of Larpenteur Avenue to Beaver Lake, City Project 81 -20 as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement in conjunction with the Ramsey County Public Works Department. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk. Nay - Councilmember Bastian. Motion passed. 2. 7:10 P.M., Hazelwood Avenue - Project 85 -27 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the construction of street, pathway, sewer and water services and storm sewer improvements on Hazelwood Avenue from County Road C to Beam Avenue. b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. c. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the proposed improvement. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Mr. Ronald Erickson, 2673 Hazelwood Mr. Erickson presented a petition signed by the area residents e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to deny the Hazelwood Avenue Project Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Wasiluk Nay - Mayor Greavu. 3. 7:30 P.M., Beam Avenue Reassessment - Project 78 -24 a. Acting Mayor. Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the reassessment of three properties on Beam Avenue for the Sanitary Sewer Project 78 -24. 5 - 4/28 b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. C. Mr. Andrew Engebretson , attorney for the three property owners (Mahnke, Roy and Keene) spoke in opposition to the reassessment, d. City Attorney Patrick Kelly explained the background of the assess- ments. Mr. Kelly also stated the hearing notices were properly published and mailed. e. Mr. Engebretson stated he had no objections to the hearing notices. f. Mayor Greavu asked if anyone wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None came forward. g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 86 - 4 - 65 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly -'!.'given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Beam Avenue Sanitary Sewer as. described in the files of the City Clerk as Project Number 78 -24, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE- SOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof , is hereby accepted and shall con- stitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be bene- fited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it, 2. Such assessment shall be _payable in equal annual installments ex- tending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1987, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1986. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. _ 3. • It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reim- burse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions re- lating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 6 - 4/28 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are . made , but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Sta- tutes 420.051, to reimburse the'City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements, 5. The Clerk shall-forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker Nay - Councilmember Wasiluk 4. 7:40 P . M. , Rezoning and Street Vacation : Burke Street ( Gear) (4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the rezoning of the south half of the Burke Avenue right of way lying west of the storm water , pond together with the north 11 feet of 2124 Barclay Street from R -1, single dwelling, to R -3, multiple dwelling; and to vacate the Burke Avenue right of way between Hazelwood and Barclay Street. b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. c. Commissioner Ralph Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Mr. Stanley Sommers, 2107 Hazelwood Mr. William Gallagher, 2125 Hazelwood Mr. William Gear, owner of the apartments Mr. Ronald Monson- 2081 Hazelwood Ms. Kathy Elkandelgy, 1476 Eldridge Mr. P. E. Walek, 2068 Barclay Street e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 86 - 4 - 66 WHEREAS, William and Bonnie Gear initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in Burke Avenue right of way between Hazelwood and Barclay Streets, 7 - 4/28 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street right of way have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 7, 1986. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on April 28, 1986, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con - sidered reports and recommendations to the City Staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described street right of way, public interest in the property will accrue to the following described abutting properties: Lots 16 through 30, Block 17 and Lots 1 through 15, Block 24, Sabin .Addition, Ramsey County NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis: 1. The storm water pond covers the middle third of this right' of way. 2. All adjoining properties can be accessed without construction of this street. 3. Vacation would eliminate the nonconforming setback from this right of way of the adjoining uses. This vacation is subject to the retention of: 1. Retention of a 30 -foot wide drainage and utility easement over the north half of this right of way between the east right of way line of Barclay Street and the northerly extension of the east line of the west 15 feet of Lot Nine, Block 24, Sabin Addition. 2. Retention of a 30 -foot wide drainage and utility easement centered on the center line of this right of way between the west right of way line of Hazelwood Street and the northerly extension of the west line of the east 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 24, Sabin Addition. 3. Retention of a ponding and utility easement over the entire right of way between the northerly extension of the west line of the east 2 feet of Lot 3, Block 24, and the northerly extension of the east line of the west 15 feet of Lot 9, Block 24, Sabin Addition. a� Adopted this 28th day of April, 1986. Seconded by Counci lmember Juker. . Ayes - all 8 - 4/28 g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 86 - 4 - 67 WHEREAS, William and Bonnie Gear initiated a rezoning from R -1, residence district (single dwelling) to R-3, residence district (multiple dwelling) for the following - described properties: The north 11 feet of the West half of Lot Eight and Lots Nine through Fifteen, Block 24, Sabin together with the South half of the vacated Burke Avenue right of way abutting to the north. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by William and Bonnie Gear, pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 7, 1986. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 28, 1986 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state- ments. The Council-also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh- borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in- cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, \ efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this 28th day of April, 1986. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. - 9 - 4/28 5. 7:50 P.M., Variance : 2060 Barclay Street (Monette) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mr. John Monette for a four - square foot variance for a six square foot home occupation sign at 2060 Barclay Street. b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following voiced their opinions: Mr._Bruce Jordan, 1460 E. Belmont Mr. P. E. Walek, 2068 Barclay Mr. James Lancette , 1463 Eldridge Ms. Judith Monette, 2060 Barclay d. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. e. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption 86 - 4 - 68 WHEREAS , John Monette applied for a variance for the following- described property: Lot 4, Block 1, Wakefield Manor. This property is also known as 2060 Barclay Street, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36-316 (2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a maximum sign area of two square feet for a home occupation sign; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a six square foot sign, requiring a variance of four square feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was reviewed by the Community Design Review Board on . April 8, 1986. The Board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 28, 1986, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Community Design Review Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved. Adopted this 28th day of April, 1986. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk Councilmember Bastian Abstained. 10 - 4/28 1. Telephone System a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. b. Mr. Bill Simon, representing William E. Schultz and Associates, Consultant, presented the specifics of the proposed telephone system for the new City Hall. C. Mayor Greavu moved that the low bid from Telexecoms, with the exc U tion of cable and installation, be accepted and that a contract be authorize ' d with them in the amount of $53,030.00; Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Bastian. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. P.U.D. Preliminary Plat and Street Vacation Cave's English Street 2nd Addition a. Director of Community Development Geoff Olson presented the Staff report. b. Commissioner Sletten presented the Planning Commission recommendation. c. Mr. Sam Cave, Ed Cave and Sons, spoke on behalf of the project. d. The following area residents spoke regarding the proposal: Mr. Julius Loipersheck, 2156 English Street Mr. Ray Willett, 1282 E. Junction e. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the following as requested by Ed Cave and inn e _ Tn r• l . Approve a planned unit development (PUD) for five small -lot single- dwelling lots and 36 condominium units, 2. Approve the vacation of existing street and alley rights of way. Y 3. Approve a preliminary plat. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Wasiluk Nays - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker Motion failed. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Budget Transfer for Data Processing Study -- 11 - 4/28 a. Mayor Greavu t transfer of $7,000 from the General Fund Contingency Account be approved to finance the costs of a data processin study, g Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - all. 2. Tax Increment Bond Projects a. Mayor Greavu moved that the following projects receive financing by the City's 1986 Tax Increment Bonds: Estimated Planned Total City Tax Increment Project Cost Bonds Portion $1,630,000 $1,000,000 Water tower south of Larpenteur Ave. 293,000 195,400 Hudson Place water main 1,167 205,000 Southlawn Drive from Beam Ave. to Co.R d. D 546,860 230,470 McKnight Road from Hwy. 36 to Conway Ave. 73,000 73,000 Hazelwood Park acquisition 225,000 75,000 Hazelwood Park devleopment 250,000 100,000 Lydia Ave. /McKnight Rd. park development 125,000 110,000 Acquisition of Harvest Park 200,000 200,000 Traffic lights at Hazelwood Ave. and $4,509,860 $2,188,870 Southlawn Ave. on Beam Avenue TOTALS Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Code Amendment Motor Fuel Stations { 1st Reading) g a. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Staff re p ort. b. Councilmember Anderson moved first reading of an ordinance amending the Code to update the motor fuel station requirements. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 4. Code Amendment - BC (M) District Motor Fuel Sales (1st Readin a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report b. Commissioner Sletten presented the Planning recommenddtio n . C. Mr. George Rossback stated he was in opposition to the ro osal. P P d. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance amending the BC (M) � ) Code to allow motor fuel pumps with convenience stores as a conditional use. Seconded by Councilmember Was i luk . Ayes - Mayor Greavu Councilme tubers Anderson, Bastian & Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Juker - 12 - 4/28 5. Solid Waste Task Force a.. Councilmember Wasiluk presented five names of people to serve on the Solid Waste, Task Force. She stated Environmental Health Officer Bob Wenger has agreed to act as temporary chairperson and she will act as an observer. b. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to appoint the following • Task Force: g o the Solid Waste Robert Wenger, Temporary Chairperson Gregg and Kathy Juenemann Rita Brenner Coleen Halpine Judith and Bill Rojas Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 6. Hudson Place /Crestview Drive Water Main, Project 85 -7 a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 86 - 4 - 69 WHEREAS, pursuant resolution passed by the City Council on Aril 1986, plans and specifications for Hudson P P 14 , Place-Crestview Drive Water Main, Project 85-7, have been prepared by or under the direction of the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications cations P to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof , are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, pening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at - 10.00 a.m. on the 22nd day of May, 1986 at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied p ed by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City f Maplewood, Minnesota, for 5% of the amount of such -bid y P d, . 3. The City Clerk and the City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract at the regular City Council meeting of May 22, 1986. 13 - 4/28 Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. 7. North Beaver Lake Storm Sewer Project 83-7 Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, Juker and Wasiluk. Mayor Greavu abstained. a. Mayor Greavu introduced the f011owipq resolution and moved its adoption p on 86 - 4 - 70 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on February 10, 1986, plans and specifications for North Beaver Lake Storm .Sewer, Project 83 3-- 7, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the City Engineer, Y g who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans-and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved pp plans and specifi- cations. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 a.m. on the 21st day of May, 1986, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 5% of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to recieve, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and lace herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. ved. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city Council meeting of May 22, 1986. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. 8. Connor Avenue, Project 84-10 Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson , Juker and Wasiluk Nay - Councilmember Bastian. a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 86 - 4 - 71 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on March 24, 1986, plans and specifications for Connor Avenue, Project ect 84 -10 have e been prepared by or under the direction of the City Engineer, who has r - sented such plans and specifications to the Council for approve l P e . -.14 - 4/28 NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEW0QD MINNES 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk, 2, The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official cial paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the. making of such improvement under such a P approved plans and specifi- cations-, The advertisement shall be published twice,, at least ten days before date set for bid opening,. pening, shall specify the work to be clone, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 a.m, on the 28th day Y y of _ May, 19 86 , at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, pay- able to the City o Maplewood, Minnesota for 5% of the amount of such bid, 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open and read aloud bids received at the time and lace herein noted, and to tabulate the ' bids received. ved. The Council will consider the ' bids , and the* award of a contract, at the regular cit Council meeting of June 9, 1986, Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - Mayor Greavu,. Counci lmembers Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk . Nay - Counci.lmember Juker 9. Castle Design a. Manager Lais stated Cantle Design has constructed a l 000 foot trunk water main extension as part of the.' Beaver Creek apartment project. e P p . � ct, This pipe was oversized from an eight inch to a sixteen inch to meet the City's need for adequate capacity in Service Area Six. Y It is recommended the City Council approve an expenditure of $16,106.85 from the hydrant fund to pay Castle Design for the oversizin g- b. Councilmember - Bastian moved to approve ' the expenditure of 16 106 $ w85 from the hydrant fund to paX Castle Design. . for the*oversizing of the water main Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes all. .10. Battle Creek Park Site a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. 15 - 4/28 10. Battle Creek Park Site a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved informal approval of the purchase of the 3 -1/2 acre site in Battle Creek Park subject to the following: 1. Maplewood is to purchase the 3 -1/2 acre site and lease it back to the County. 2. The County will apply for and obtain Met Council funding or di s s- - ,bursement in 1989 and purchase the site from the City for the City's out -of- pocket expenses , except interest, y 3. The County will lease an acreage o f approximately 10 acres in the Fish Creek area lying east of 694 and north of Carver Avenue, and land in the Hazelwood Street area just south of Beam Avenue amounting i g to approximately 10 more acres under long -term leases. The County approve of this plan and prepare the detailed agreements, in- g , cluding land descriptions and authorization to turn over to the City materials that the County has dealing with the 3 -1/2 acre site . Seconded by Counci lmembe r Anderson. Ayes - all. 11. Tree Removal Specifications a. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 86 - 4 - 72 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on April 28, 1986, plans and specifications for Diseased Tree Removal Project No. 86 -6 have been prepared by (or under the direction of the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THE REF ORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA: i. Such plans and specifications.. a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof , are hereby approved and or- dered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an adver- tisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 2:00 p.m., on the 12th day of May, 1986, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certi- fied check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood., Minnesota, for 5% of the amount of such bid. - 16 - 4/28 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids re - ceived. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of May 12, 198649 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson, Ayes - Mayor Greavu, CounCi lmembers Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk Councilmember Bastian abstained. 12. Radio Tower a.. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the bid of Northern States Tower Service in the amount of $22,320.00 for the purchase and installation of a 120 foot radio tower to be located adjacent to the new City Hall. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 13. P.A.C. Funds for Playground Equipment a. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the expenditure of $21,000.00 from P.A.C. Funds for the acquisition of the following layground equipment: PARK Afton Heights Bike Rack - Mexico Forge - 10' Double Face $ 245.00 18 Openings Maplewood Heights Garbage Containers Goodrich GAME TIME Western Hills 15 Picnic Tables - 8' #768 - P.92 @ $175 2,625.00 Heritage Center Robinhood Four Seasons Buck -a -Bout - P.63 - $619 ($200) 3276.00 Lions ' Wakefield Four Animals - $800 - ( $200) 41000 Maplewood Heights Picnic Table #794 - 6' Single Post $438 ( $100) 1,076.00 Afton Heights ' Lions Snail Climber - P.26 - $1,226 - ($400) 3 252.00 Wakefield $6738 17 - 4/28 MIRACLE Kohlman 2 Benches - Miracle #1206, P.115 - @$160 Robinhood $ $ 326.40 Four Seasons Whirl (Jr) P-514300 - $575) - ($175) Goodrich 2,256.00 Lions Maplewood Heights Mexico Forge - $1478 ( $500) 1, 978..00 $19.r 034.00 am 18 - 4/28 Plus Freight $ 2, 000.00 TOTAL $2 1, 034. 00 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 14. , P . A . C '.;. Charge. Funds . Capital Iimprover..ient Projects a. from Mayor Greavu moved to approve the following Projects the and ro ' p vide $75,0.00.00 P.A.C. Funds to a for the pay proposed projects 1. Curb Goodrich Drive and #1 Parkin g Lot 2 @ $2.50 $ 5,000.00 2. Curb Main Parking Lot at Edgerton on 3 Sides 400' @ $2.50 1,000.00 3. Pave Entrance & Parking Area, Curb Parking Area at Heritage Center . 61000.00 4. Curb Lower Afton Heights Parking Lot 900' @ $2.50 21250.00 5. Sherwood Excavation 5,000.00 - 6. Maplewood Heights Parking Lot on Beam (140' x 40' 622 Sq. Yds. 3,500.00 7. Ballfield Improvement - Flicek, Harvest 6 ,000.00 8. Geranium Excavation 10,000.00 9. Fill Cracks & Resurface Tennis Courts Afton (2 Courts & Basketball - $3,100.00) Four Seasons (2 Courts - $2,400.00) 5 10. Hazelwood Soccer Development 30 ,000.00 TOTAL $74,250.00 Seconded by Councilmember J'uker. Ayes - all. am 18 - 4/28 8 15 . F.B.I. National Academy a. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the following temporary appt Ken Collins is atte ointments Police Department while Director of Public Safe in the F.B.I. National Academy from June 29 through September 12, 1986, nding the 1. Acting Chief 2. Two Acting Captains and that the individuals filling these positions be compensated • P aced accordingly. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all 16. Selection of Insurance Agents a. Councilmember Bastian moved to select Ekblad, Pardee and Bewell Forest Lake Insurance Agency, � Inc,,, g y, and the W. A. Lang Com an as Age nt s and to assign insurance companies to them as recommended by the _� letter dated April 28, 1986. consultant i n his Seconded by Juker. Ayes all J. VISITOR PRESE NTATION 1. George Supan, 3050 Hazelwood a. Mr. Supan questioned why Metropolitan Transit buses can use Haz elwood Street when they have been P r load limits. Also, the commercial trucks hauling dirt are using Hazelwood Street, He stated he has this and nothing has been done, repeatedly reported b. Staff to investigate. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Meeting with Building Inspector a. Councilmember Juker suggested that the Council have a meeting with reviewing g the building inspector regarding g the present building codes. 2. New City Hall Opening a. Councilmember Juker presented several ides to promote the new City Hall. 3. Reconsideration a. Councilmember Juker discussed the possible reconsideration of the motion regarding hard surfacing of parking lots. b. No action taken. 4. Letter from Mr. Behr a a. Councilmember Juker discussed a letter from Mr. Behr concerning o cerning the traffic and parking problems at Century and Upper Afton P Road. 19 - 4/28 5. Reconsideration a. Councilmember Anderson moved reconsideration amendment as ado opted 4, ideration of the parking ordinance code p by Council on A ril 1 1986, by re uirin 50 sites to be 10 feet and 50 o to be 9 feet. q g Of parking Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Y s Mayor Gre avu , Counc i lmembe r s Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk . Nay - Councilmember Juker. 6. Police Training a. Council stated they had heard about the St. Paul Firing Range on Linwood Avenue and would like to view it. b. Council was invited to tour the facilities on May 1. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. M . ADJOURNMENT 10:59 P.M. City Clerk 20 - 4/28 MEMORANDUM T0: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: City Manager Associate Planner -- Johnson Time Extension -- Planned Unit Development 2696 Hazelwood Avenue Health Resources, Inc. Hazel Ridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) May 1, 1986 SUMMARY Action by Council: Endorsed Modified Re j ected_�„ Date Request Approve a time extension for the Hazel Ridge PUD (a senior housing project). Comments The applicant has made a good faith effort to begin construction of the seniors' residence within the first year. As explained in the enclosed letter, financin for this project should be secured shortly. Recommendation Approve a one -year time extension for the Hazel Ridge planned unit development ( to begin construction of the Hazel Ridge seniors' residence, subject to the J riginal conditions of the PUD as approved on May 13, 1985. mb Enclosures: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Letter r a • low Un sc • MI • F M Iw sc- Beam Avenue MI IF Nit • - - fir—• --r �, •C p �r �� • l.s C R� ' IF It N R JWTr -R R _ R ri • • n R • P U O qp M � EooE �a„L R R f � F � • Ml �' � t R Lac SC sc R L s lk w1 �+ R s R l•MC } MI ` i MI • MI Highway 36 M1 got AW J ® R t r R R (R LL ` o MI ON f or s R ' • t► • r _ F LaC f R fpc • 1W : #4 4% • C Avg ri L Sl LOCATION MAP 2 Attachment One 4 N - � �� �► � fie. M' _ '� � � ) 'i raw► ;-- _�. r k �►•,� _ _ $ rra dr W, a� ' �-� ��►0( q ►.► � .'• as EXISTIN NRI BUILDING f f �A ,r 41 !i r . of dOW .lam a • ----r i HAZ E L RIDGE • ' PUD Attachment Two 3 4 N � b , �IEALTH ■ ��RESOURCES April 29, 1986 Mr. Randall Johnson Associate Planner City of Maplewood 19 02 Fast County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Johnson: Please consider this letter as a request for an extension of the Conditional Use Permit for the Hazel Ridge Planned Unit Development issued to Health Resources on May 13, 1985 by the Maplewood City Counci 1. Subsequent to the May 13, 1985 action by the City Council, Health Resources has achieved the following objectives toward eoumumencing construction: ° A competitive bidding process was conducted in late October 1985 among four general contractors with Bor -Son Construction Companies selected as the general contract by virtue of its lowest bid; ° A final bond resolution for issuance of tax -exept housing revenue bonds was received from the City Council in late December; ° Several meetings with the Fire Marshal and building inspector have been held since December resulting in numerous additions to the design of the building; and ` ° A general partnership was formed in December 1985 for purposes of syndication, The partnership referred to above was formed for purposes of obtaining the necessary equity to close on the project and cco ence construction. The necessary private placement documents for marketing .the partnership were completed in February 1986. Due to the nature of a general partnership (versus a limited partnership) and the ambiguity surrounding tax law because of the various tax reform bills before Congress, we have not generated sufficient interest in the general partnership to obtain the required equity to close on the project. 2696 Hazelwood Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 612/779 - 4535 4 Attachment Three Randall Johnson C ity of Maplewood April 29, 1986 Page -2- Accordingly, we have - decided that closure will require organiza- tional equity and credit versus partnership equity and credit. To achieve this objective, we have entered into a letter of intent with another major health care and housing provider. This agreEment will provide the necessary equity and credit as required by the under writing firms to close the financial aspects of the project and ccmmence construction, If you have any questions please call me at 779-4535. We would appreciate this request being scheduled for the May 12, 1986 council meeting, Sincerely yours, F ohn Hurley Director, Housing ervices os 61 E W00*3 0 ,ketion by Council* MEMORANDUM Endorse Modif Re j e ct e Date- TO: Cit Mana FROM: Cit Clerk RE: New Location for Existin Li License (Off-Sale) DATE: Ma 6, 1986 Mr. Ra Streeter, Spark Li Inc., 3000 White Bear Avenue, has re permission to relocate his business in the Maple Rid Mall, 2515 White Bear Avenue. The new location meets the Code requirements. City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Ave. Maplewood MN 55109 Dear City of Maplewood Please accept this letter as a formal request for a license transfer from our current location of 3000 -White Bear Avenue to the new location of 2515 White Bear Avenue. We will close at 10 : 00p. m. Saturday, May 10,1986 and wish to open at the new location Monday morning., May 12, 1986. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Raymond P. Streeter Spark Liquors President (612) 296 -6430 STATE OF MINNESOTA � � PS 9068.03 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION ST. PAUL, MN 55101 APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OFF -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE Whoever shall knowingly and willingly falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a partnership one of the partners shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. For a corporation one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. PART BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER L�,_,_ APPLICANT'S HOME PHONE NUMBER I, 1 / �' , for and in behalf of Name of: (individual) (partner) (officer of corporation) or (names of partners) or (name of corporation) make application for RENEWAL of Off - Sale intoxicating liquor license located at: J000 _,eA7 f street address — or — lot and block number) City of Zip Code �� ,�� _ , County of , commencing 19 &> , and ending '® y 19 Check ( ✓ ) box if no changes since last applying for renewal of license. If there has been a change; that is, change in owner - ownership; addition of partner; administrator or administratrix to an estate named; change of officers, directors or stockholders in corporation; change of location; or new liquor establishment, then form PS 9136, Application for Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License, must be executed instead of this form (see your city clerk for form PS 9136). Will applicant be granted On -Sale Sunday On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License in conjunction (Yes or N o) (Yes or No) with the Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for this location? , trade name (name of individual) PART II FOR CORPORATION: (names of ficers, directors and stockholders) r d-e- S - die A) '� - (Over) PART 111 a. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a liquor license rejected q J t by any city or State authority; if so, give date and details A b. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details /lJ c. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the past five years were ever convicted f o any Liquor Law violation or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws; if so, give date and details A), Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Director; and all ordinances of the City; and 1 hereby certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,19�. (Notary Public) My commission expires REPORT ON APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the applicant, or his associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or City Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as hereinafter stated (name of city) Approved By: POLICE DEPARTMENT TITLE (If you have no police department, either the Marshal or the Constable shall execute this report on the applicant.) MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Ripley Avenue Water Main -- Edgerton to Bradley Proj 85 -4 DATE: May 5, 1986 .Action by Council: Endo reed.�.,. Modify. e i e c t e d,13,w D ate ��- •�..�.�... The above -named project has been substantially completed and is scheduled for assessment this year. It is recommended that the council order the preparation of the assessment roll by passing the attached resolution. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have presented the final figures for the improvement Ripley Avenue Water Main, City Project 85 -04. _NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the c i t y clerk and city engineer sha l l forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable . lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection, FURTHER, the clerk shall, upom completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. MEMORANDUM Action by Council, Endorsed Modified. , TO: City Manager Ike j ected,„ FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Appointment -- Review Board Vacancy APPLICANT: M. Earl Marlow DATE: May 5, 1986 On April 22, 1986, the review board recommended.the a oin pp tment of Mr. Marlow to fill the vacancy on the board. The current membership roster and term expirations P are as follows: Members Term Expiration Date Donald Moe 4th term expires 1 -1 -88 Robert Peterson 2nd term expires 1 -1 -88 Vacancy term expires 1 -1 -88 Thomas Deans 3rd term expires 1 -1 -87 George Rossbach 2nd term expires 1 -1 -87 James Kochsiek 1st term expires 1 -1 -87 Mr. Marl ow' s application is enclosed. Jc Attachment: Application for the review board position . MA6PLEWOOD BOARDS & COMMISSIONS APPLICATION FORM pAME M. Earl Marlow Date 02/06/86 ADDRESS 1930 Jackson St . , Map 1 ewood 55117 Phones Home 489- Work AGE 5 3 �i0ME0WN]�t s YES X X MINIPUMP Number of Years ae a Homeowner 14 Y e a r s No MEMO Number of Years as a Resident sa me Would regular attendance at meetings be difficults Yee No X X On which board or commission are you interested in eery ing on? List 6 number 1 being first choice. COMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PARK & RECREATION CO MISSION MOUSING do REDMLOPMENT AUTHORITY X X X PLLMNG COMMISSION HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION If this is a Renewal Application total number ber of meetings held on your board or commission this past year? How many have you missed? MEMNON Education BS Bus Adm, Southern I l l i n o i s University Edwardsv i lle Present Occupation and Employer S e l f employed G en Contractor, specializ in maintenance repairs. Number of Years 4 ye a s New Applicants onlys Previowe ob experien � xp ce and employers. list last three). Development � Specialist, Ramsey Count for 9 ear County y s. Coordinated plannin desi n f nd' • Nursing Nome, County -wide Municipal 110-- - Courts and a great many arks & park - i es. p p k List Organizations or Clubs in the Community which you have been, or are an active participant North Surburban Chamber of Commerce, Setter Business Bureau Minnesota Metroland, Minnesota Regional Touri Commission. Background experience in any of the Boards or Commissions, If any. : Maplewood Human Relations Commission for 6 years. Why would you like to serve on any of these boards or commissions? I would l i k e to be active. i n civic vi c affairs again and feel that m experience .and continuing business y the work of the P lanning Commissi activities can be of value to . Commission, Additional Comments. I n t e l l i g e n t rnaster p 1 ann i n of th • a healthy mix of 9 e 1 and areas of our city, to rovide • industrial, commercial, residential and p opportunit1eS for our corporate citizen recreational to. al > Of us, and I b s s of continui importance believe i eve i t must., be deve 1 oned and a.dmi n . i ctArad with f. Action by Council MEMORANDUM i e TO: City Manager Mod `y FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Rejected, SUBJECT: Code Amendment (Motor Fuel Stations) �� DATE: April 2, ' 1986 .SUMMARY Request Update the motor fuel station sections of city code. Reasons 1. The motor fuel station code was adopted in 1967 and is out —of -date. Since it was adopted, the industry has shifted from full — service gas stations to convenience retail stores with self— service gas sales and no repair facilities. Newer city ordinances and community design review board standards also make this section obsolete. 2. There are three pending applications for convenience 9 rocer y stores with gas sales. The code should be updated before these stations are built. Comments Changes to this ordinance would only apply. to new motor fuel stations or exist— ing stations that expand or replace equipment. Existing stations that do not change would not be effected. The only significant changes are to require leak detection and containment facilities, and odor reduction facilities where residential property would be effected. Recommendation (at least four votes needed for approval) Approve the ordinance on page 3 to update the motor fuel station code require— ments. BACKGROUND Department of Health Section MHD 217 (c) (dd) of the State water well construction code requires water wells to be: Fifty feet (50 ft.) .from a buried sewer, septi tank, subsur— face disposal field, grave, animal or poultry yard or building, pri vy, _petroleum �stor4gg. tank, or any other sewage.or l wastes that may drain into the soil. Fire M arshal The National Fire Code will permit an underground petroleum storage tank to be located within three feet of a property line. Minnesota Pollution Control A enc MPCA Air Quality Division 1. There are currently no rules to control the emission of gasoline. va ors from P The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency submitted a report to Congress in December 1985 that recommended the development of rules for these vapors, in particular those from benzene. Benzene, a principal component of gasoline, is a known cancer — causing substance. Two options that are being looked at are charcoal absorption systems to filter the vapors emitted when the underground tanks are filled and requiring the vent for the underground tank to be connected to the fill truck. This closed —loop system is presently required in some states. 2. An official from the MPCA estimated that, under normal wind and humidity conditions, vapors from an underground tank vent should not be detectable 200 to 250 feet from the source. Vapors from the dispensers are generally enerall not detectable beyond the vicinity of the pump islands. Water Quality Division 1. Where the water table is accessible by a petroleum roduct leaking from P g a tank, contamination has been detected up to 800 feet from the source. Leaks that migrate only through soil are generally not a P roblem.be Y and 200 to 250 feet 2. New regulations are being written b the MPCA to r such Y q uc things as leak detection systems, double— jacketed tanks and tanks within vaults to reduce the risks associated with underground petroleum storage at gas stations. These regulations are anticipated to take effect in 1987. jw Attachment Proposed ordinance 2 ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CO AND BC ZONING DISTRICTS REGARDING MOTOR FUEL STATIONS ..THE MAPLEWOOD CITY. COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -141 to 153 are amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Seer -36-141r--Ref e f ey4ew eeefd Wee � e � �e �ttdgmee�-- ��e ��- at�t�4eg eemm� ee� ee de�e�m4�ee ��a� - ae�r eens4defat4 -eef efe- 4t- eeeeefe+e a- GO -d4stf -et- w444- ee -eeeef fitted -ey a- fev4 ey- the- eemfflen ty deerge- fev4ew- eeafd -- fit- eha4l- ee- empewefed -te ma erred fefea� aed- s- ese� ette -- �-e- deb-- eeaee- �edg- ete- e�-ew- {�8�d - -Pde: 8eee: -36- x-42 -36 -x-69: -- Reeefved- 9T�T�TB� -�: Fete - e -fit �eeee -e - fie -d�- � -epee - e- e�-�- ewe -eg -we de - terffle- aed- phfaeee she - hare - the - fed- 4ew4 feepeet4ye- mea"4"ge- aeef+bed -te -them :- eee� - e� - ewe �� ma�e� e���r ��e�ettg��a�ee-- a� ��e �- e�e�eee�� eta - e� - ewe the e+ty eeg4eeef -ee- the- e4ty -mes- to -r- e -t-ree -t- pTati- P�ae� - mee� - tee ea4 ee�-- A - mee� - tee-- ear ee- Teeaed -w44e- 4ye ea -fie -e -me et- eel - a -aed -w �-e - - e- a�- ee- eegaged- - e- et����- y4- eg- geeds- aed- serv4ees geeefa fege4fed -4n- the- eperat4ea -aed- ma4"teeaeee -ef - metef- yeh4e4ee-- -T6eee may- 4ee4ude- aa4e -ef - petfeTeum- pfedueta-- ea4e- aed- eefvte- -tag -ef - t4ree ea��e��- ee-- atr�eme�4�e- aEeeaee�� -ee - we�Taeemee�- �a��e - wae��- eg- aed- �ee��ea- t4ee- eefv4eee and- the -peff ermaeee -ef - m4ftef -at emee - Te -me4a eeaeee -aed repa --r: Metef Etter etat4ee ee"vee4eeee- etefe-: - - -A- stare- epefated- 4e -een jene -tree -w4-t-h a -ma jer meter - Etter- etat4ee- er- tfee4- step -f er- the- pefpeee -ef -ef f efz-eg -f of eaTe geede t�e� eeeee�4a� �e ��e- e�etca�4et�- e�- ae- at��emee�-- �e- e�- �e -��e Attachment 1 ��ret e� ��ee��eg �eem�-- eee= �- eeate��-- w�- ���- e— i= �- �e— �ttee�e�— ��g8�- �ee� —e� -the— fight —ef -- way - ef — e- dee4 gtietee — etate tfuo4 hzighway — - f ede- e44- y —e4ded 8��-- }� - -�-8- �- �-- 4�-- et - �e$ ; eeeempeey tie �� et —���e �e}-- ��e e� ty- Ee��E� -�-- miry �tt�m�t t�e�e �� ee� �e�- ee���- de�et�ee - eed �eeemme��et� e�� — te — tie ��- eee� eg eemm� -��� -eta btrs4ness— aftd— eefflfflere4al— d4str} et— wk► 4eh— w4ll— best— sefye— the— geftefa4— we4fafe at�d— �e�►e #��- e�— ��e— et�� #�e— e }�� - -- f 6e�e— �- �b�-- §— �B� —A�A� Secs. 36- 141 - -36 -150, Reserved, DIVISION 7. BC BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, Sec. 36 --163: 151. Use regulations, In a BC Business District , 4fi_ the — e4ty, the follow— ing regulations shall apply: (1) Permitted uses: A building may be erected or used, and a lot may be used or occupied, for any of the following purposes, and no other: (a) Apertme"t A dwelling unit for one family in combination with business use. (b) Hotel, motel, tourist home, rooming house or boarding— house, (c) Retail store, restaurant, office, agency, studio, bank, personal service.and craftsmen's shop, or mortuary, (d) Automobile sales agency that sells new cars or new and used cars eye— �eeete�— eel— e4�— �e��� -ee�— aye— eeeettete� —ee— tie —�-e� 4 (e) Newspaper publishing or job printing establishment. (f) Theater. (9) Wafid- er aut eriat4e Self-service laund (h) Bakery or confectionery shop, for the production of articles to be sold o n l y at retail on the premises. (i) Public repair garage or motor fuel etat4e ; - reyz-ded -teat a �- �- eeeee- te- epe�ate- et�E�- �tte�eeee- �- e- ��- ���- e�ta�- eed -��em tie- E�-ty- Ferree- i- 4- p��ette�t- te- e�a�te�- �- �- e� -t��- a -Gene: - -A��- ���� �- e- ga�agee- ae�- r�ete�- �tte�- etat�- et�e- mt�e�- �e- ee- 4edated 4iies- k4iide -ef et:Ieh - bUS4' neee sales, provided that the l i c e n s i n g require- ments in chapter 17 are satisfied. ( j) Parking lot as a principal use. _(k) Car wash. {j4 CNG com ressed natural ( p gas) and LPG (liquid petroleum gas) dispensing facilities, except those whose primary purpose is to produce power and light for nonvehicle uses, such as at A NSP's facility on Century Avenue and for temporary use in construction sites. Tanks shall not exceed a water capacity of 1500 gallons. The l i c e n s i n g requirements in Chapter 17.3 shall be complied with. X44 Any use of the same general character as any of the above uses, provided that no use which is noxious or hazardous shall be permitted. (2) - Spee4a4 - ex Conditional uses: The following uses are a 11 owed whee atither4 ed- by- tbe- e4t- y- eettee4- -- ee- a- epee4a- -- a *eept-4ee by conditional use permit: (a) All uses permitted in R -3 Residence Districts, except the construction of dwelling houses permitted in divisions 3 and 4 of t h i s article, R -1 and R -2 Residence Districts. (b) Processing and distributing station for milk-or other beverages, carting or hauling station, .(c) Place-of amusement, ,recreati on or assembly, other than a theater,- when eeedtiet4eg conducted indoors. (d) Yard for storage, sale and distribution of i ce coal wood fuel oil or building materials, when enclosed within a fence of not less than six (6) feet in height, but not including junkyard, salvage, automobile or other wrecking yard. 9 (e) Used car lot. (3) Setback from property zoned residential: The All building or accessory structure(s), except trash enclosures, but including fuel pump islands and canopies, shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard set— back of thirty (30) feet. These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy —five (75) feet, subject to the most restric— tive of the followi requirements: (a) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty— five (25) feet in height. (b) Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residentially zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. Secs. 36- 152 - -36 -153. Reserved, Section 2. Sections 36 -156 to 36 -170 are amended as follows (additions are underlined and deletions crossed out): Seeti -en-36 —x-56: -- Metef— fee4 ei✓at4eee-- Geeera44yr �- e�— te— ��e— E�aeeee— eed— �e�t�— �- e— �ee��- ee— �6— �- ��-- e�— t��- e— d�- �� -e�et� —eed e�a�- �— �e —��- aced — epee a — e�te k�a��- e�— ��e— a�ea— aed— ��ea�meei✓— ae —��e�� -deb Sec. 36-158'156. Motor fuel stations- -Site design and operation. The following provisions shall apply to any motor fuel station. .4e aey— bee4eeae -- and— eemmere4al —d4stf -et -4n— the—e4ty Motor fuel s t a t i o n shall be defined as the site of any business which includes the sale of motor fuel, except the sale of comp ressed natural gas or liquid petroleum gas: (a) The setback of any overhead canopy or weather protection, free standing or projecting from the station structure shall be not less than fifteen (15) feet from the street right —of— way line nor less than twenty (20) feet from any adjacent property line, is (b) The total height of any overhead canopy or weather protection shall not exceed twenty (20) feet. (c) External Open, —dead storage of motor vehicles, other than motor vehicles for rent, shall not be permitted for a period of more than forty —eight (48) hours. 0 �e�-- �e- �ee�e -�e� eat -e - �y- metes- �tte�-- etat ee- eee�ee�- eeee- e�e�ee- et�e�- tae t�eee- geee�a�- �y- �e �e� -�e�- tie- e�e�at�- e e - ae� ma4n teeanee- ef- ffletef- yeh4e4ee-- ehal4- be-d+sp -ayed- eete4de -ef the- pf4"e4 pa4 meteia ue- -- etat4ee etfuetufe sha44- be- eene4defed- ae- ffent- #aee- f er- afeh4teet-ttfa4-app-repf }a-teeees- �9�-- R-► ��t�} r��rr�- �et�- ��A�- �ee�- �at��sea�e�- �+a��- �I�a��-- �e- ��at��ed -at�d �a} t��a��ed- �el�} �d- ��e- p�epew��+- ��� ►e- a�e+�$- a��- ad�aee�►�- �t�b�fie s�a��- �e- �a} t��a�t�ed- a�et�g- e��e� }e�- ��e�e���r- � }�es�- e�ee�� -a� df -+'veway- eot-iaaoeee- te - � - ae�eea��- e� - ae� ettet�ett��es - e�a� �-- �e - �t���aee�- w�t�- eeee�ete �44--Resefyedr eeee- e�- eem�aet- e�e��� eee- �e��e- eet - eee - tae - qty- {-�8 - etQeete� - ae�- may- etas- ee� -a�- eel- tie- e��e- ae�- t°ea�- �- et- �- �- ee- t�i�rt meta- et�e�- �ee�- �eet�- a� �tae�e�ty; - ��e�t��e�- that-- etre�- ee�eee- �- e�- e�a��- ete� at �- eaet -��- eeee- ��-��- feet- e�e�t -e�- tie -��eet �} All trash, waste materials and obsolete parts shall be stored within a separate, at Qeb4t- eetttr-a- - -Ty- eempat- 4b- le- etfttetu -re - beh4od tie �taeepa�-- ettetttQe - e - tie metetc tte�-- etat� -ee : trash enclosure. This trash enclosure shall comply with the requirements of Section 36 -27 (e). {-�-} �- eter� etQ- etttc�e- e�a��-- be- eeeettQttete�- w�- t��-e- tie- �tQepe�ty -te ett�metteta�� a - �ee� -fie: All rental campers, trailers or motor vehicles shall be stored within the rear or side yard not adjacent to -the a street. These rentals shall not be stored within the front yard setback, oef the side yard adjacent to the street or adjacent to residential zones. �. �fi4 A44- eets4de- pafk4flg- spaees- sha44- be- leeated- te- the- s4de- ef-feaf ef- the- pf}fie4pa4- stftrettrfe- No outside parking. space(s) shall be located within the line of vision between self- service fuel pumps and the attendant's window. {e4 Al outdoor illuminati shal l be provided with lenses, re— flectors or shades which will concentrate the light upon the premises so as to prevent undue glare thefefrom being directly visible o n any adjacent street-- feedwaty or pf4vate- pfepeft4ee eeet p4ed- 1=er-- fes- +dettt.-a- -- ptffpeees residentially zoned property. LhJ A maneuvering area with at least twenty feet of width shall be provided along each side of a fuel pump island. If an underground petroleum storage tank would be within 800 feet of a ground water well used as a primary source of potable water, or within 200 feet of a residential zone, leak detection and containment facilities shall be required.. The type of facilit ies shall be approved by the ci ty fire marshal and be consistent with the "best available management practices' recommended by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ( MPCA). If the vents to the underground petroleum storage tank(s) would be within 200 feet of a residential zone, vapor odor reduction facilities shall be.required. The type of odor reduction facilit ies shall be approved by the city fire marshal and be consistent with the best available management practices' recommended by the MPCA. If adjacent to a residential zone, external speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal conversation level) at the residential property line. 1 Whenever possible, a building housing a principal use of the site shall be located between residentially zoned property and fuel pump islands and associated fuel storage tanks. �et�a� t�etared� eg eeyt�� eg - te - tie eet�t�arry �- e et�e� eeEt� et�e - ef - t�� - e Cede -- tie- 1 =e�-�- ewe- e�- �e�tt�- �emeet�- e�e��-- be- e�ee��ed- �e�- e��ee -f e� -metes �t�e�- etar��- eee- �- e- at�y- beereeee- eed- eemr�e�e� e� d��t� yet - � - e - tie e� �a�-- Pde�- r�e�e- �I�ar�- eye- pede��a�- s��t �-- �e� }�► e�eess e # �we�►�y �� � - ��g� t�e�- �e��- �I�a�- ���e- ���- �ee�- �re�- a- ���aewa�r a� }�� �ea�e�� �e } �►� - �tre#�- � }g�- ��a��- #�a�e- tie- r�e�e- ��a�► - �� e* eeed- fflefe- thaft- erne- htrnd wed- �;BA4- sqttefe- feet-4fl- area- pef kb4-- 4-}fttef na4- ffletsf- ftre�- ��a��et�- �a� -1�a�e - ewe - f �a��- ��g��- �I�a��- �a�re- tie- r�ere- �#�a� saes - f _ e*eeed- fflef e- feet- #"- area - der- faee - = - The Aep - e#- any- streh- s4gict- sha-14- iist- be- fflefe- ��at�- �aae���r- {�8}- �ee� - �t� eye- �ede��a�- ��+ �e-- �t�s�t�ess- �- det�����ea��st�- s�gt� �te� �e e�eeed ��i4f ty- f 4ye- �3-64- feet- 4n- be4ght-- ereeted- w�th4"- any - e*eept pfepef��- ���► e- �east��e�- �e���e��a���=-- �ar�d- s }g+�- slaa�� #�a�e - r�e� fflefe- thaft- three- 4- 34- faees =- fled-} n- e*eess- ef ene k►undwed € } f ty4158 4 n o shale -he -4 eee tha+i - eo* -t eee - 4-64- -feet vefti- eaa-- d-i staeee - fem e�a�- �- -he- eel -�- eee- ��ae- ��- �e- �6�- �ee�- ��e� -- aed.- d��- �ewa� d� -�-�e �d�-- P4a�e� r�e�e� �tre� ��a��e�► � a+�d �wtre� ��e�� �a�r -k�a�e - ewe - f �� ��gt�- ��ia��- t�e�- e�eeed- �we�►�� -��8�- #eel- ��t- �e�gf��- fee: - �6- �- 68--- .�ar�e-- �e�-- �a�d-- �e�hee� -- eke:-- �e$t��•�er�et��e: Pdetw�- ����aed�t�g- aed- eee��a�� ��e��- e�•et�e- �- e- ���- e- d� -��-e� -eta; � tag r��t��- r�ttr�- tie$ ��- �e�ee��- e��r�- �-- he- eh�e��ed- �et�- �- e��-- �a�d�- aed- �e��ae�� �e� �e�e� ��e�-- ��a��- eea- �- t�- ht�e�eeee- aed- ee�r�e�e�- a�•- d�- ����- ��e- � -e -��e e4ty -!- 94de -Yafd eee Aeee Adre Pear- Pump W -idth Y-a r-d -Ya -rd Se-t- h-&e-k- tee - -eaee �6g -' 68 26! fu - 1- 200' -6(' �ee�a�•�- e�- ��e�e� ���-} See-- 36 --16 -- game-- Aeeess- df4veways- A44- aeeess- df+vewa,ys- •a�- d� ����e�e �e ��e e��� ��a�� - - he -deer geed - aed- eee���tte�ed- aeee�d�- tag- �e -��e ee���- ee- e�- ��e- �e�e�� eg- �tth�•�e :- e� de- � � ee e�- ��e- d��- �e�ra��- •�e�e��ee�e- a�� -��- eee- d- ��e�e���- -��-ee le aey ease whefe- tie- e4ty- eeg4ft detefm4ees- that- pfeseet -eta f ttttife - -tr-af f - e - eeed 4 eee- fege4r a - gfeatef d�- etaeee-- eeeh -d4s- taeee-- ae -he- ' pee4f 4es- eha;4- he- fequ4fed_ h - - the- ����- �a�r�- d�. s�a�ce_ hey. �ceer�_ d��. �ce�ca�cs _shall_he_�hi�tu_L3�1.� ter • E -E-�}--44 am g -to--0re --�- twee -t - S kraa�--- k�e-- �- o-r��r-- f -�-rfe �454-degfessr-ufi-less - ethefw+se- de�e�m4fted- ��- ��e- e���+- et�g #�ee�w. �d�-- P4�► ���trr�- d�s�at�ee- ��er�- ���- �ewa�- �s- a��aeet��- ��epe�ty- s}de -;et 4-&1 f _ . nieaetrred- a-leiig- t-he- piaepert-y- 4-+tie- bet-weeti- etrrb- #aeee- i Secs. 36 --1g2 157 - -36 -170. Reserved, Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publica- tion. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of 1986 Mayor ATTEST: Ayes- - City Clerk Nays -- 10 �. Uode Amendment -- -Motor Fuel Stations bons Planner`` Johnson said the r • � proposal is to update the current cit code as the i ndustry has shifted from full —servi y ce stations to convenience retail stores with self— service gas sales and no rep facilities, p aci 1 ities. Jim Embertson, fire. marshal, said two —way communication is required from the Pump s to the dispensers according to state l aw. P1 anner , : , Johnson .-sa i d -the main • n concern is-keeping a separation so it is not a. nu i s ance. I nthe BC: may be no rob l em - . h y p with this, however, in the di stri c.t. there shoul be a setback, to - r p event a nuisance.. Mrs- er tson said the eak r • , p a could be situated so the back part of the s eaker would be facing the res i dent i a l property, P The commission uestioned q if the tanks are inspected when installed. Mr. Embertson said the tank • s are tested prior to' shipment from the manufacturer and after installation an air test is also r • re qu i red i red by the ci ty, EPA i s proposing a requirement that in the future tanks be installed above ground. He commented on where there was a problem ' P with .fuel tanks leaking. . Commissioner Whitcomb moved the planning comet ss ion recommend to the city council approval of the ordinance to update p e the motor fuel station code requirements as outlined in the staff r • eport with the f o l l owing: 1. Division 7, BC, Business s Commercial District, Section 36.151 a should - state. A dwelling ( � unit for one fami in combination with a business use 2. Clarify under (e) if the words "and/or" �� ds and /or should be used in lace ' p of or. 3. By keeping in Section 36.156 (k) the city may be in violation of state law. This section should be modified Commissioner Barrett seconded The: commissioner said the con i • d ti on regarding the speakers sh.ou 1 d be stated SO it is more restrictive than what is required by the state agency, Voting on the motion: Cardinal, Di Ayes--Commissioners Barrett, Ditch, Fischer, He j ny, Whitcomb TO: City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson SUBJECT: Code Amendment (Gas.pumps in a BC —M zone) APPLICANT: Richard Schreier (North Suburban Company) LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Beam Avenue and Southlawn Drive. DATE: April 2, 1986 SUMMARY Request Action by Counoil n Ehdorsed...,v, Rei eoted.,,„ Date Amend the BC(M) commercial district (modified) zoning district to allow gas pumps in conjunction with a convenience shopping store. Reason for the Re The applicant wants to include four gas pumps as part of a neighborhood convenience .center, proposed at Beam Avenue and Southlawn Drive. The site is zoned for BC(M) use. Gas pumps are only allowed in BC, business commercial zones. Comments Of 25 cities similar in population or adjacent to Maplewood, 23 allow retail stores with incidental fuel sales to be located adjacent to residential uses. When properly screened from residential uses and where safeguards would be imposed to protect against passible airborne and underground pollution, incidental fuel sales facilities would be no more obtrusive than other BC(M) uses. Recommendation (At least four votes in favor for approval) Approve the ordinance on page 5 to amend the BC(M) zoning code to allow motor fuel pumps with convenience stores as a conditional use. BACKGROUND Survey of Other Communities Of the 25 cities surveyed (see,Attachment One), 23 allow neighborhood — oriented c- onven;i ence shopping facilities with- accessory gas sales to locate adjacent to residential uses. Maple Grove and Eagan prohibit fuel sales with convenience stores. Two of the 23 (Oakdale and Shoreview) classify this type of use as a permitted use, provided the sale of fuel is incidental to the sale of other goods or services. Opaque screening is also required and outside displays are restricted. The other 21 communities require a conditional use permit for the fuel pumps. Conditions of approval generally consist of in setbacks, opaque screening and restrictions regarding canopy size, location and signage. Procedure 1. Community design review board 2. Planning commission 3. City council, public hearing and first reading, second reading and adoption mb Attachments: 1. Survey 2. Ordinance COMMUNITY SURVEY Regulation of Convenience Shopping with Gas Pumps (No Repair Facilities) Permitted in Neighborhood Shopping Districts Adjacent to Residential Uses How Re Apple Valley 'Yes CUP for the pumps Blaine Yes CUP Brooklyn Center Yes Not permitted to abut single dwelling g or town h ouse districts. Requires a CUP when abutting other residential uses. Burnsville Yes CUP - -No canopies for pumps in neighborhood 9 ood convenience shopping centers. Gas must be a secondary use. Columbia Heights Yes CUP -- Canopy must meet a fifteen—foot front yard setback. Landscaping and screening between Pumps and residential uses. Coon Rapids Yes CUP- -Fuel must be a secondar y use. A maximum of two pumps. per neighborhood center. Cottage Grove Yes CUP Crystal Yes CUP Eagan No Fridley Yes Golden Valley Yes Little Canada Yes Maple Grove No New Brighton Yes New Hope Yes North St. Paul Yes Oakdale Yes CUP CUP for the pumps CUP - -Pumps must be set back at least twenty feet. CUP -- Canopy must comply with front and building etback r y 9 requirements, gas must be secondary use. CUP- -Gas must be a secondary use CUP Permitted Use. Limited to four self—service f service pumps. 100% opaque, 10 —foot high screening when within 75 feet of abut abutting residential denti a 1 property. Gas must be a secondary use. 3 Attachment One Permitted in Neighborhood Shopping Districts Adjacent to Residential Uses How Regulated Plymouth Yes CUP Roseville Yes CUP Shoreview Yes . Permitted Use, Twent y foot landscaped area ''and outside displays. South.St. Paul Yes CUP--Pumps must be screened ed .from residential uses. Vadnais Heights Yes CUP -- Greater s • setbacks than normal, limit mi t the hours of operation. West St. Paul Yes CUP White Bear Lake Yes CUP 4 ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOTOR FUEL SALES IN BC(M) COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (MODIFIED)ZONING DISTRICTS THE MA:PLEWOOD CITY 0OUNCIL,HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1,, Section-36-155 (c), (d), (3) and (f) is amended as follows (language to underlined and language to be deleted is crossed out): (c) - Spee4a; Conditional use permit, The following ses m a y be all g y al when authorized by the c i t y council by means of a spee4a -- conditional use P ermi t: (1) All uses permitted in R -3 Multiple Dwelling Districts except pt .the construction of houses permitted in R -1 and R -2 Districts. (2) Laundromat or similar automatic self— service laundry, y (3) Restaurant, where there are no drive —up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences. (4) Place of amusement, recreation, or assembly, other than a theater, eater, where there are no outdoor activities. (5) Motor fuel sales in con 'unction with a convenience store, that comp y with section. 36-156 .provided there are no more than four conventional _ nal fuel um s ei ht dis ensors and two specialty fuel um s fou dis ensors (d) Prohibited uses: (1) Drive —in theaters or drive —in restaurants. (2) Commercial or fee parking lots where such use is the only a given parcel or where such use provides for general rather than specific use parking, p (3) Uses that involve the exterior storage of equipment, goods or materials. (4) Car wash. (5) Public garage (6) Compressed natural gas or liquid petroleum gas dispensing facilities. (7) Motor fuel sales not in con 'unction with a convenience store (e) Definitions: "Drive —in restaurant" means a restaurant with a drive —up order window or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. (f) Setback from property zoned residential: The all buildings or accessory structures, except trash enclosures, but includin fuel pump islands and canopies shall have minimum side and rear yard setbacks of fifty (50) feet and a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet. 5 Attachment Two These minimum required setbacks shall be increased, not to exceed seventy— five (75) feet, subject to the most restrictive of the following requirements: (1) Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot the building exceeds twenty —five (25) feet in height. (2) Exterior wall area; Where an exterior wall faces a residentially— zoned property, the wall setback shall be increased five. (5) feet for each one thousand (1 -,000) square feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of 1 9 1986. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- 0 I ... ..-. - ...�.... ... ..... ... .. .. ...... .. ....._.. ....... ... ... ... ...... .. ....... .. ..... . .......ww.wlM.w1Y.V. AIM- •.....A.•.N.[..u,tiy.ry,. ..+Mrww1. wr.. ... ... ...... ....... __ - ...� .... .... D. Code . Amendment - -BC (M) District--Motor Fuel Stations Planner Johnson said the ap i cant is • PP requesting the BC (M) district be modified to allow gas pumps in conjunction with a convenience shop i n center. Commissioner Ditch moved the plannin commission t ' g e c i ty counc � 1 ...approve. the ordinance. to amend the BC (M)- ..zoni ng code . to al low motor fuel um s wit p p t conveni store& as . a .:condi.t ona 1. use. Commissioner Cardi nsal seconded ' Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Card.i nal, D i tch, Fischer,, He jny Whitcomb 6 76 • r � Action by Council: S MEMORANDUM Endorsed TOO City Manager FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Rejected-.. SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permits Date - - - - -- LOCATION: Beam Avenue and Southlawn Drive APPLICANT: North Suburban Co. OWNER: Richard Schreier, James Lennow and Fred Plessel PROJECT: Bonanza Family Restaurant and Shopping Center DATE: April 17, 1986 SUMMARY Request 1, Approval of a conditional use permit to allow a restaurant in. a BC (M) , business commercial (modified) district. 2. Approval of a conditional use permit to allow the sale of motor fuels in a BC (M) district. Proposal A one -story Bonanza Family Restaurant fronting on Beam Avenue. South of the restaurant, with direct access to South lawn Drive, would be a 15,470 square foot shopping center with motor fuel sales. (See the site plan on page 8 .) Comments 1. Restaurant: The proposed restaurant would meet all of the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, provided that all cooking odors are controlled so not to be noticeable by adjacent residents. 2. Motor fuel sales: Council must approve a pending code amendment to permit motor fuel sales in BC (M) districts. If the code is amended, the applicant's proposal would be consistent with city code, provided the site p l a n is amended to show the pump island and underground tanks to the north of the shopping center. This change is needed to comply with one of the proposed performance standards that states "whenever possible, a building housing a principal use of the site shall be located between residentially zoned property and pump islands and associated fuel storage tanks." Compliance with the other proposed performance standards for pollution avoidance and site design would adequately protect the public health and safety. These requirements would include the installment of gas leak detection and containment facilities and gas odor reduction facilities on ' the vent from the underground fuel storage tank. The proposed performance standards were developed with the assistance of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Health Department officials in response to the concerns revised by area residents. Recommendation 1.0 Adopt the resolution on page 9 approving a conditional use permit for the Bonanza Family Restaurant in a BC (M) district, based on the findings in the resolution. Approval is subject to all- cooking odors being controlled so not to be detectable at the boundary of the residential zoning district to the south. 20 Adopt the resolution on page12 to approve a conditional use permit for the sale of motor fuels as part of a convenience shopping center in the BC (M) district at the southeast corner of Beam Avenue and Southlawn. Approval is subject to: 10 Council approving proposed amendments to the motor fuel sale and BC (M) sections of the zoning code as recommended for approval by the planning commission on April 7, 19860 2. Community design review board approval of revisions to the site plan dated 3 -26 -86 to: a. Relocate the pump islands and underground fuel storage tanks to the north side of the proposed shopping center. (This change is required to comply with proposed Section 36- 156 (1) of the proposed amendments to the city's motor fuel sales zoning requirements.) b. Reduce the area of the shopping center as necessary or add additional parking spaces. Approval is recommended on the basis that if the above conditions are met, the following findings required for approval of a conditional use permit would be satisfied: . 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter because where . properly screened (as required) from residential uses to protect against possible airborne or underground pollution, incidential fuel sales facilities would be no more obtrusive than other BC (M) , business commercial (modified) uses. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. of 25 cities similar in population to Maplewood, 23 allow retail stores with motor fuel sales to be located adjacent to residential uses. 30 The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the zoning. district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. (Refer to finding one.) 2 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances because the use would be subject to performance standards to avoid possible air, water, soil and noise pollution. These standards were developed with the assistance of off icials from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Health Department. 69' The use would generate only.. minimal vehicular traf fic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties, 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. (Refer to findings one and five.) 3 BACKGROUND Site Description 1. Lot size: 2.4 acres 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Beam Avenue. Across the street is Maplewood Movies II. Southerly: single and double dwellings Easterly: an undeveloped lot proposed for a Merril Lynch office building and the rear yard of 1815 Radatz Avenue, Westerly: Southlawn Drive and undeveloped property zoned for BC (M) use. Past Action 9- 17 -81: Council denied a conditional use permit for a. Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Theatre restaurant for property zoned for BC (M) use to the west of this property in the Hirshf ield building. There are no findings for denial in the minutes. Planning 1. Land use plan designation: LSC, limited service commercial. 2. Zoning: BC (M) , business commercial (modified), 3. Ordinance requirements: a. Section 36 -155 (c) (3) , conditional uses in a BC (M) district, allows restaurants where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences. b. Section 36 -442 (b) requires ten findings for approval of a cond i t i.ona 1 use permit, Refer to the resolution on page 9 . C* Section 36 -442 (f) states that the council may, upon review, terminate the permit if the approved conditions may have been violated or the use is no longer in effect. Where the construction .of a special building or structure of a monetary value in excess of twenty -f ive thousand ($25,000,00) has been permitted the council shall provide for a period of amortization of not less than five (5) years. Where public health, safety and welfare concerns are threatened the five year amortization period is not required and the council may determine the amortization period, if any, to be allowed. 4 Citizen Comments Staff surveyed the surrounding property owners within 350 feet. Of the . 12 respondents, seven were opposed, three were in favor and two had no comment. Those in favor stated. that "it would bring some needed services to our: neighborhood" and "the area needs more family 'restaurants" and "as a whole, the development would create more jobs and that it is certainly a convenience." Those who.opposed, objected to the motor fuel sales because: 116 Of the danger of a gas leak that could contaminate the water supply for the homes on Radatz Avenue. These homes rely on wells . for their water supply. 2. The annoying smell of gas. 3. There are enough gas stations close by. 4. If gas stations would have previously been allowed, I would have sold my property years ago. 5. Late hours of business not compatible with a residential neighborhood. 60 Increased traffic. 7. We fought for three years on rezoning proposals for this area to keep such things as gas stations away from our property. 8. Beam Avenue businesses should be clean looking. jc Attachments . 11 Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4o Resolut i on ' ( restaurant ) 5. Resolution (motor fuel sales) i .......... F IL-1 AVE Ct mi R = R LE)C M I M I 17-t Ll� t� M I TRUNK %- -41-- - . - F WAY r A r - --. -� (R 3 C --77-4 T-77 R -)uN T Y LAUIU TR 7-C R E A :) fic vi L AV ST AV' (R2) r �4 R AVE =R C____ C' J U ^ a� ( -RK_ VE- T' R3 Z-A R 1-4 (R Cr A" K F F-.Av- ki oncrIjun7kA L BC � C R 2 -- R R R • PUD I R F I R z L F . ........ . . L' HIL t R DE AVE Cr M I R L- i __, BC ca i • iL IRA- n I R R 3 BC (6C) F F Ml FR2 F Ml Ml BC BC BE: A AVE j mi 8 F Ga �� ' j F / / KOHLMAN u R Cn Lr R ROAD r F12L.- F :p R 2 LBC) ............. (T 27 j-, F F l. LOCATION MAP 0 Attachment One 4 4 E x Movi es at Maplewood I I SO. 4• a 87s o Z)OC, w0. /e 76566 •- % • . . _ 569 -0 3 - ISO ©/3 T, CO UA r --••y G ti►• r61 Few • 4--- N � i t , /[, e' .wo. y M 11 t T^KS'M trOl4 BERM ^\IC. .f C.T p1l rL �Z•fylli3O ; 11 -9t :*. . L. '• � O A 6 •• : .r : . ✓ .:...... �.•:.....:..•..:. ..•• . ro osQ f ce ;� •f••• L • ••• •.• ✓ }••. •• to • ••• •••. 1 ., :•. L• . �,.• � •�.; .•�, .... r. r,,r .: ..... � ' . r: .... y . .. ........ .• ..... .. t ` ............._ r •f. • . • .••:'•.••I. �� .• • f••• :• :• • : •• ••• • L- XON :•: :.�.•,;. • �.5�1r': •r:• o:•:.::r•.C:• Z 8 4 ac, C ` U VIP r •.. • . •.......•.;• .. :•;::.. 3 a ...: •... . •. M Ok ... .: •. • ••:: • Y :• ::�'✓:• •::• :::: :: • i • :: • i• Yr• f J n . ........:............�.:..: are C` ' n i c �, sQ OD X 1 .•:.... r .... . � .... .. ...::..: • r�r.• •.•: �.• • :•••••.• :•r .•.• :• :• : `r .}. ::...: •. ::irshfields hefti X :1 v S MAO -� 28380 l.o �za �o a Tso . o 90 rr 2. 2 0 5 o so (� } l � 836¢ ac. � so kn d 4 t Vse- 2832 1795 ��1809 1815 1825 1 loo 100 goo• 100 oa' Ipo' 1 tb ' t t C"J 85 t o 1 ' t .283 c - ��. �.• TZ r : ISO' too 100 100• 20' •�, AVE �� rs• ? 5s' '13' 7S' .34�c ;, 4 •34�a�. - 34•a • •2lac..34 ac • .34 sc. • 69 ac . .46 s C. -46&c. 146 ac. %n In 4 >t * 9 U) � r �.. + t t + v q) 04 00 190 i8o too 090 170 / 33) so 52 2 52. 52 . lot mad t (37) ^ ' --- `0 04c210?ctti M t oll, PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Attachment Two Q N V A"A' / 3•E � ; 7m. 7�7 y .0 BON ' -,� RESTAURANT ., If I - or sail t rc �f ry' •/ / ,• / /� /, % % , % r % /' % / J• �' '• ' , �' /� / ' I / f /; ' � % ' ' • If OA DHOPPINO CENTER / I / , O rd , / r % I �• / , ,• , I - I ' i If 4 v cW4 If i SITE PLAN v 3 -26 -86 8 Attachment Three 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council'' chambers in said city on the day of 1986 at 7 p.m. The following members were present; The following members were absent. WHEREAS, North Suburban Company initiated a conditional use permit for a restaurant in a business commercial (modified) district at the following- described property: North 391 feet of the East 100 feet of West 350 feet of part of Southwest 1/4 lying North of Radatz Avenue (subject to road) in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, and East 100 feet of West 250 feet of North 390 feet of Southwest 1/4 (subject to road) in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, and Except South 235.2 feet; the West 150 feet of part of Southwest 1/4 lying North of Radatz Avenue (subject to roads) in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 116 This conditional use permit was initiated by North Suburban Company pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This -conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 21, 1986. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 30 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1986. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 10 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 9 Attachment Four 30 The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, - odor, fumes, water pollution, -water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not ,create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated March 26, 1986, unless a change is approved by the city's community design review board. 2. All cooking odors shall be controlled so not to be detectable at the boundary of residentially zoned property. Adopted this day of , 1986. Seconded by Ayes -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY RAMSEY ) SS. CITY OF MA P L EWOOD ) I., the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1986, with the original on file in my 10 off ice, and the same is a full, true and complete transcr ipt therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19869 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 11 Pursuant to die call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1986 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, North Suburban Company initiated a conditional use permit for motor fuel sales in the BC (M), business commercial (modified) district at the following- described property: North 391 feet of the East 100 feet of West 350 feet of part of Southwest 1/4 lying north of Radatz Avenue (subject to road) in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, and East 100 feet of West 250 feet of North 390 feet of Southwest 1/2 (subject to road) in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, and . Except South 235.2 feet; the West 150 feet of part of Southwest 1/4 lying north of Radatz Avenue ( subject to roads) in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was initiated by North Suburban Company, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on April 21, 1986. The planning commission recommended to the city council that said permit be 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1986 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff.and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings-of-fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter bec -ause when properly screened (as required) from residential uses to protect against possible airborne or underground polluting, incidental fuel sales facilities would be no more obstrusive than other BC (M), business commercial (modified) uses. 12 Attachment Five 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Of 25 cities similar in population to Maplewood, 23 allow retail stores with motor f uel sales - to be located-adjacent to residential uses, 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4* The use , would not depreciate property values. ( Refer to finding-one.) 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances because the use would be subject to performance standards to avoid possible air, water, soil and noise pollution. These standards were developed with the assistance of officials from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Health Department, 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 70 The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. ( Refer to findings one and five.) Approval is subject to the following conditions : 1. City counc i 1 approval of the proposed amendments to the motor fuel sales and BC (M) sections of the zoning code as recommended for approval by the planning commission on April 7, 19860 2. Community design review board approval of revisions to the site plan dated 3 -26 -86 to: a. Relocate the pump islands and underground fuel storage tanks to the north of the shopping center, ; N b. Reduce the area of the shopping center as necessary or add additional parking spaces. 3. Adherence to the approved revised site plan unless a change is approved by the community design review board. Adopted this day of , 198 Seconded by Ayes -- 13 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the under's i.gned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have caref u l ly : compared the attached and foregoing ex tract of minutes. of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 19,86, with the original on file in my off ice, . and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate.seal of the city this day of , 1986. City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 14 V I I I. NEW BUSINESS Z/- . _V / -- X�6 A. Conditional Use Permits - -Beam Avenue Secretary Olson said the request is for a conditional use permit to allow a restaurant and sale of motor fuels in a BC (M) zoning district. Staff is recommending approval of the request as outlined in the report. The commission requested the applicant show where the pumps and underground tanks will be located on the site. They also questioned if there would be doors on the south side of the shopping center. Richard Schreier, 2125 DeSoto , said he has not tal ked formal ly to the architect w reference to the pumps and tanks, however, he i s workin g on..relocati them in front of the building. They do have to be careful in relocating them so the pumps are not near the main traffic lane coming in from Southlawn. The tank locations are prett y well monitored by the state. The site is somewhat deeper than normal, and the tenants do want as much visibility to Beam Avenue as possible. The proposed layout moves the building further .away from the residential property. The parking along the south property line is intended for employee parking. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the lannin commission recommend the P g city council adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permi for the Bonanza Family Restaurant in a BC (M) district, based on the findings in the resolution. Approval is subject to all cooking odors being controlled so not to be detectable at the boundary of the residential zoning district to the south. The planning commission also recommends the city council adopt the resolution to approve a conditional use permit for the sale of motor fuels as a part of .a convenience shopping center in the BC (M) district at the southeast corner of Beam Avenue and Southlawn. Approval is subject to: 1. Council approving proposed amendments to the motor fuel sale and BC (M) sections of the zoning code as recommended for ap b the PP y ,planning commission on Apri 7, 1986. 2. Community design review board approval of revisions to the site plan dated 3 -26 -86 to: a. Relocate the pump islands and underground fuel storage tanks to the north side of the proposed shopping center. (This change is required to comply with proposed Section 36 -156 [1] of the proposed amendments to the city's motor fuelsales zoning requirements.) b. Reduce the area of.the center as necessary or add additional parking spaces. Approval is recommended on the basis that if the above conditions are met, the following findings required for approval of a conditional use permit would be satisfied: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter because where properly screened (as required) from residential uses to protect against possible air- borne or underground pollution, incidental fuel sales facilities would be no more obtrusive than other BC (M), business commercial (modified) uses. - 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Of 25 cities similar in population to Maplewood. 23 allow retail stores with motor fuel sales to be located adjacent to residential uses. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of the zoning district. 4. The use would not deprec i ate ro ert values. (R to finding P P y one. ) 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration., general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances because the use would be subject to performance standards to avoid possible air, water, soil and noise pollution. These standards were developed the assistance of officials from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Health Department, g y 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The, use would not create excessive , additional requirements at P ublic cost for public facilities-and services; and woudl not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, (Refer to f i nd i ngs . one and five.) Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Cardinal, Ditch, Ellefson, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten, Whitcomb .B. Hazelwood Avenue Reconstruction Secretary Olson said the state,law requires the planning commission review a-1 1 capi tat - .improvement projects - to determine whether the project complies with-the comprehensive plan. Director of Public Works Haider explained the proposed project. He said the street would be centered on the right —of —way. The new storm sewer would outlet into County Ditch 18 which is designed for a 100 —year storm sewer. He further explained the approximate assessment would be for a typical —type lot (minimum size). Commissioner Ditch moved the planning commission recommend the city council find the proposed Hazelwood Avenue reconstruction is consistent with the comprehensive plan, since it is the plan's objective to assign a high priority for arterial street planning, development and maintenance. Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Cardinal, Ditch, E1 lefson, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundi k, Sletten, Whitcomb B. McKnight Road Reconstruction Secretary Olson said the state law requires the planning commission review all capital improement projects to determine whether the project complies with the comprehensive plan.. Director of Public Works Haider said the proposal is a 52 —foot wide, four lane arterial street to. be consistent with the plan. Ramsey ount is i y y the agency n charge of construction. The project starts in the area south of Maryland Avenue. Another phase will straighten out the curves in the Stillwater Road /Stillwater Avenue area. It is intended that the bridge construction will begin first. Commissioner Sletten moved the planning commission recommend the city council find the proposed McKnight Road reconstruction is consistent with the comp re— hensive plan, since it is the plan's objective to assign a high priority to arterial street planning, development and maintenance Objectives Section 85, Subdivision 2). Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes -- Commissioners Barrett, Cardinal, Ditch, E l l of son, Fischer, Larson, Si gmundi k, Sletten, Whitcomb C. Mining Permit--North of Beam Avenue The commission indicated that it was-the complete commission that requested a report on the conditions of this mining permit, not just Commissioner Barrett. G. .0. / MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: Diseased Tree Removal Bids DATE: Ma 5, 1986 Action by Council: Endorsed Modif ied______� Rejeoted._____-~_ Date Bid will be received May 12 1986 for diseased tree removal, Project 86-6~ A recommendation for bid award will be presented at the council meeting, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner SUBJECT: Code-Amendment -- Parking DATE: May 1, 1986 SUMMARY Request ,fiction by Council.; Endorsed Modified, Rejected. Date 10 Amendment of the parking requirements to allow half the parking stalls to be nine -foot wide and half to be ten -foot wide, for 90 degree parking. 2. Amendment of the parking requirements to require hard - surfaced parking lots and striping. Reason for the Request 10 The city council, at the joint council /planning commission meeting of January 29, 1986, directed staff to draft a code amendment to allow nine -foot wide parking stalls. 2. The recent amendment of the parking code did not address hard surfaces or striping on parking lots, r nmmAn i- c Nine -foot wide parking spaces are the most accepted standard today, based on the survey on page 4. Although there is a greater potential for dents in car doors with nine -foot stalls, they are still relatively safe. The city requires hard - surfaced parking lots and striping through the site plan review process. This policy should be put into ordinance to make it more I enforceable. Hard — surfaced parking lots are cleaner, more aesthetic, facilitate drainage better, are dust free and are less of a maintenance problem since they hold up longer than the alternative- -dirt or gravel. Staff considered whether future city park parking lots should be exempt from the paving and striping requirement, and surveyed 21 area cities. (See page 5.) Some of Maplewood's parks are not used during the winter, which may lessen the need for paving. The majority (810) of the cities survey, however, require paving, so .hard surfacing of the park parking lots would not be out of character with these neighboring communities. Requiring paving and striping of future city park parking lots would avoid complaints from the private sector that the city uses a double standard. 1 Recommendation Approval of the attached code amendment requiring minimum parking stall widths of 50% nine feet and 50% ten feet and requiring park king lots to have hard surfaces and striping. 2 BACKGROUND Past Action 8- 26 -85: Council amended the parking requirements to make one concise parking ordinance. Part of this - - revision dealt with parking stall . dimensions which - required .that all ...901 degree .parking spaces be at least ten -feet wide. Parking stalls for owner - occupied -multiple dwellings and diagonal spaces, however, may be only, nine feet wide. Sample of Car. Dimension Make Dimensions --- (Width /Len th in Feet g ) VW Bug 5 x 13.5 Mercury Linx 5.5 x 14 VW Rabbit pickup 5 x 14.5 Dodge Aries 5.5 x 14.5 Oldsmobile Omega 5.5 x 14.5 Ford F 100 (full -size pickup) 6.5 x 16.5 Ford van 6.5 x 17 Chevrolet Caprice 6.5 x 17.5 Ford Torino 6.5 x 17.5 Chevrolet Kingswood Estate Wagon 6.5 x 18.5 Survey (Parking Space Dimension) The most often required parking stall dimension is 9 by 20 feet. Survey (Paving of City Park Parking Lots) Of the 21 cities surveyed, seventeen required paving, one did not (as well as Maplewood) and three encouraged it but had no specific requirement. Procedure 1. Recommendation by the community design review board. 2. First reading by the city council. 39 Second reading by the city council. jc Attachments 116 Ordinance amendment 2. Parking space dimension survey 3. Paving of park parking lots survey 3 . ORDINANCE NO AN AMENDING MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -22 (b) is amended and Section 36 -22 (f) is added as follows (all additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) : Section 36 -22. Off - Street Parking. (b) Fifty percent of ninety- degree parking spaces shall be at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long and f i f t percent shall be at least nine feet wid a twenty_ f eet long except for owner- occupied multiple dwellings. All other spaces, including ninety degree stalls for owner - occupied multiple dwellings, shall be not less than nine feet wide and nineteen feet in length (measured parallel with the striping lines), exclusive of access aisles. If a parking space abuts a curb, sidewalk or landscaped area, the required length of the space may be reduced by one foot. (f) All parking lots and associated drive shall have a hard surface of bituminous or concrete. All parking spaces shall be striped. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council this day of , 1986e Mayor Attest. I City Clerk Ayes-- Nays-- 4 5 • � Q f- f a r� hr,� o � + 7 .PARKING SPACE .DIMENSION SURVEY 8 -30 -83 . S tall: D imensions when Ci Parking- Dimensions abutting cur • b, sidewalk . or landscaped area A isle ' Width Coon Rapids Eagan g n 9 x 18 9 x 16 24 Brooklyn Center 10 8 x 11 x 20 19.5 10 x 18 8 ' 8 "x 18 24 Vadna is Heights g 9 x 18 9 x 16 24 St. Paul 9 X-18 9 x 16 24 Burnsvi l le (8 9 x x 16 compact) 18 20 Plymouth 9 x 1805 no change it 24 Fridley 10 •x 20 ,o 26 .Blaine Crystal 9 x 20 „ 25 24 New Brighton 9.5 9 x x 20 20 �� �� 24 New Ho Hope 10 x 20 ' 22 Golden Valley 9 x 20 �� 24 No s pecif ied White Bear Lake 8.5 x 20 �� requirement A Apple Valley 10 x 2 0 �, 24 .South St. Paul 9 x 20 24 Roseville 9 x 18 20 Columbia Heights 9 x 20 �� 24 Cottage Grove 9 x 2 0 �� 22 No s pec i.ed Shoreview 9 x 20 � requirement No. St. Paul 9 x 20 �� 24 . No specif ied Oakdale 9 x 2 0 �� requirement Woodbury 9 x 20 20 Newport 10 x 20 24 No specified requirement 5 • � Q f- f a r� hr,� o � + 7 SURVEY City Maplewood Roseville Plymouth Brooklyn Center Fridley Crystal New, Brighton Apple.Valley St. Paul Vadnais Heights Little Canada Woodbury .PAVING OF CITY PARK PARKING LOTS 2 -27 -86 Requires Paving Paving Encouraged Paving Not - Required but Not Required . . r West St. Paul Cottage Grove Columbia Heights x :i x x x x x x x x x x (Paving may not take place initially, but would be added later.) x x x (Parking lots with over six spaces must be paved.) Maple Grove x White Bear Lake x New Hope x North St. Paul x Newport x Oakdale x Shoreview x "Paving" in this survey refers to asphalt or concrete surfacing, Attachment 3 i 2r �� l 13a a eig hteen—foot d.ee p arking stalls, exce t * for those ab.utti n curbi or g P P g P g g s i dewa shall be increased to nineteen f eet. ` 14. The nine oot wide parking spaces are permitted, pr�ovi di ng council amends the ordinances allow that width. 15. - The -site plan sh l ° be rev ised .t.o P y : o went —f oot wide service lanes on both , s ides of the p i s 1 ands. 16. - . -of ;coed ti ona l se permi ..t by-the city council to allow the proposed restaurant and gas pump faci 1 i in BC (M) district. 17. The applicant shall provi d a m etary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% f the es *mated costs of any site improvements that are not completed by ccupancy. 18. Stop signs and ha icap parking signs sha be provided. 19. Fire lanes s 1 be marked in accordance to the ire marshal's requirements, 200 The driv ay to Beam Avenue shall be 26 feet wide as a county requires, The rev' w board does not support the concept of g as pumps in t location. This atter is a land use issue subject to council approval. and Member Peterson seconded Ayes - -all. B. Code Amendment -- Parking Stall Width and Parking Lot Paving The board discussed with Secretary Ekstrand the ro osed amendment which would P P require minimum parking stall widths and require parking lots be hard surfaced. Board Member Peterson moved the board recommend to the city council a p p roval 'of y PP .the code amendment requiring minimum parking stall widths of nine feet and requiring parking 1 ots to have hard surfaces and striping. Board Member Kochs i ek seconded Ayes--all, L, VISITOR PRESENTAMNS IX. MFF PRESENTATIONS I X. ADJOURN.NT M�ot:i ng ad jour�rej� at 8:03 p.m. Z -/ M E M O RA N- D U M .Action by Couno.1 Endorsed Modif R.o j cctod_.. Date. T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director /e-ez�ea� RE: 1985 Annual Financial Reports and Audit DATE: May 5, 1986 Recently the City's 1985 Annual. Fi nanc.al .. Reports and audit were completed. Three documents have been prepared: 1) General .Purpose Financial Report - contains data extracted from the Comprehensive Annual Fi nanci.ai Report and provides a .concise summary of the City's f i,nanci al condition. Copies of this report have been d.$i stributed to the City's advisory boards and commi:ssi Al so, a - l imi ted supply wil be avail . to the public.. 2) Comprehensive annual Financial Report - contains detailed financial and. s tatistical information to provi complete information on all financial - transactions - during the year. Copies of this report have been distributed to the Council, State Auditor :, Moody's Investors Service, Standard and Poors, bond investors and the Maplewood Library. 3) Management Letter - contains the auditors' comments and recommendations regarding financial management. Copies of this letter have -been distributed to the Council and Finance staff. It is recommended that the Council schedu.l e a meeting with the auditors to discuss these reports. Last year a special meeting was held to allow more time for discussion and review of the reports. As an alternative, the meet- ing with the auditors could be held in conjunction with the regular Council- Staff meeting on Thursdays. DFF:amc MEMORANDUM Action by Council: Endorse TO: City Manager - Modified"....... FROM: Associate Planner -- Johnson Reieoted„�., -- SUBJECT: Tax - F orfeited Propert Date.,, DATE: April 15, 1986 u SUMMARY Request Authorize use -deed applications to be made to Ramsey County for the transfer of six tax - forfeited properties to the city for drainage purposes. 1. Refer to the enclosed map on page 4. 2. A drainage pond and open ditch are located in 0utlot C. These facilities are part of the required drainage facilities for this area. (See the map on page 4 . ) 3. Outlot B is a substandard parcel originally platted for a private Y P P walkway. A storm sewer is located in this parcel. 4. Lots 17 -20, Block One, Maple Greens 3rd Addition were platted for a quad -style town house structure. According to the city building official and the developer of the adjoining property, necessary remedial soils work would cost. too much to build on these lots. They should be combined with Outlot C (Item Two above) for use as part of that ponding area. Recommendation Approve the resolution on page 6 to authorize an application to Ramsey County to transfer title of Outlots B, C and Lots 17 -20 to the city for drainage purposes. (The planning commission should make a finding that since drainage ponds are not included in the Comprehensive Plan, there is no conflict with the plan.) BACKGROUND Planning Section 462.356 of the state law states "after a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly -owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired Y q . until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acqu i s i t i on .. , and repor ted i n wr i t i ng to the govern i ng body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition...with the comprehensive municipal plan." Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Storm water Drainage Facilities 4. Resolution (request transfer to the city) 2 LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment One qr sAl,.vr pA 29 HALOtAY AN OAV A LA P AV MAI Rum 14113 1440111 IVY lilt 1200 N. I Nwow"d 6 1i t AV v Uhp 960N. Aff A T " 3 ��AwD 32 32 7 10 M4. N. M AV 68 MAIISARE TH ��J 5M 490N. JL AV U LJ caa 240N. ilia^ 13 oo-- 14 al 2408. 15 (1) MS AV 4803. wwAw co LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment One qr • Outlot C Needed f or a pond A few L _Now% lift 27 4r 0 is") aw 6,0.*3 74-71 xiiv,>%. Z4.4f 60-03 40.03 T A 0 lur Tt. 0 q > 4. 4.. ! V �*vr, #�x AA I N A A 13 16 •- - 9 b 9 • ZA ! �:;.,. . +•r• :i.;... �: toy Outlot B: L ots 17720: retain for . `! ��••• • •' ;• i mil •• fd`�.� ..1 •. ♦ � - ' `', L d raina g ez-area -(poor soils . ;�:;:. :....,,,�;., ♦, ,} ...., •::.. r�:�.• :•:•:; • f a N (5 ( eeded for a s torm for'deveJo ment) (3 4) 1 7 18) sewer easement f I 4 15. C O j A ** . S To t, elm 39� R 0 S E v E* 1,10 13 I '61-89 lip.-SP all 3 W4 do% 4u 2 3 6 iW. 5 23 0 (4) tZ �� A 2 - � 4 (") : <#ri� - 1) A W ow i 104-. L2. *x. 3 3 490 . I- 4 0!� L I - 6; 7) h P 7 M)i Z6 25 C* 7 U 5 8 9 12 1-09 "-3 4R-35T 6Z.3S 6 5- 0. 0 135 IQ +.; h S" 67 2 0•) 2 61) 14 . TO Mg% aip • 2 � ► V, 4 3 A 0 �s R 136 tj 493) 58, Lu S qC4 4 2 5 A% 3 S .0 u 135 It. E RANIUM 4 cn • Z%9 o o (� 4 Ljj 76 -74.9 Z. 5. 3 7561- 4-40 6 ,to W ( 1�� �150) Ira 6 3 �L3) 13ru-1 Vs) M 4 U .3-1 7.S 74 ftch (IF _), C ie+ ) 3 43 4 33 16 0) 0 1 r', 09 ( , S s) 75— 15 6 d �0 0*) W(iA ofir&.) 1 9 13 14 3 4 39 3 8 11 13 (33) r- 7eo .8 1 - Z3 lo, 4 7 Z T 74 01 7 & 43 60 2.5 6Z,5 Id 1 a 2 0 4 G P, Ce") 02 C *t w) (I ell) rq a 17\ 2 w 1249 8 5 t� 0 P a) AC ji b :a X3.0 4135 it 0 1111 A 3 > ( 3 '103 (0 1 Z..9 4 0 AV 0 1 7 40 E IV 'b D D -2 6 ' W 11 (3 9 k13 ao cam) • 2 0. <,zo� , 4M oTr F to - Zb A- 93, -63 kzll ixf-5 Q 24 JESSAMINE kg ti t 4 22 3� t 4 1. 7 .6 72, PIS MAI) 0 6' t1tv 35) 4 O (,3a) a 9 18 0i t, 15 14 11 1 1­ 1 N 21 e, as % IS 61Z.6 1 0 En (130) 20 1 16 13 8(70,) Ar tal C- 1 0t . 7 729 Az.5 evz. S 8 I A­ OM 11C .% '77 oao Z '�1� } M f 13 go dt 99 l SCMoo � 14-8 sn" A N 6 •6: 1 -.0 - 0 - , kn C _ I V (_90V PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP �'' Tax-forfe Parcels 4 Attachment Two 4 ••• •• •. ♦ ........... .. ... r w ....wNYM.r •.. .• •. ... .. .• .ti. w...� w ., • .^ .w♦..w..... w ...... .... .. .................. .. w » w v.•.wvw... .. .r .r . .. ... �...... .. .�r...30 . .. . ... . r •. .... i•. '� y ». ".......... . »...• ................ Pm 962.5 N ' j Yy.: T .:::IAA . _..�.� ....: Jlt ...... .......... on ^ .... {10.. i.(...........� �. ?.�...... �:�.., r . .. .............i .. 2 a Q Ir W ti �.... `! ... ., .." • ......1.: ��..: �:� .. ............ ' 'I POND 961 N U. - h :3 4. x, 3 x t ti w fie 'a , 4 . M A R Y } -' �. �� `.: :�....:«� , Mir •i rte' .wig:. i... �.( w s M �. .... ..... .. .......... .. ,�, +....... .. :T: .. w.. .... ..,...., r ♦.w.w...w�w..w w wv....w..u...w w . «........ ............ : 9.�..:: •. '.� � , ..... ..... »:....,, ....... ».....' ». .. .......... v� Q' {..Y.4 T %'.t�'a� �„ GI ... .. - .............. :7 ` A.. �.k:,.......... (.. . i .'.a � ' � A • • I . , � . 111,+y�Y':, + ?•(. r ' ' 4 A� + , ,k,,. I ,Y { � �: t •< j � � .. is '►••��, � n�..l ...�t�..:... °... -�.. �: �:' .: �'::..i.I..T� ��� %i �� y� .� \:i �q afsj �' .. w: .. � aj r ' • �.. .w..'�~ .... ••, .•... .. '..�...........iY...... ~:.... •• ~ .. J.• Aj ♦ aJ yI•�6•M }W }:v W' .....w... ::....• -. , w� S+ at • <, �•>.. . <w Y,r. % .. +�Y,�;•vn••�A .. ...v . :� • { .r f, � ♦J ;. M: ♦' : %: :�ia��: ` JG�/'• > ;: . 7Y, vJ 7 '.:. ^ + :t 5� � - • • 7+ � •J Y a. J� t ...F 7 j jYi !f ''Xr; w.ti: ey. ;�^i... .• 2...' r .... r V �l , i'' : �� • i Y •r .. '� ''�[• �•.. ''�i'. '�: .�.' r a f r'+' r'' ;:;� •- • r .A+ r � '� A , \ � 4 . ... :�•. � � l: •3f; `r �:' • S'�. •Y' :...: .�; +'.�•'• r:` , � f!f r <.: f J J� � � •i • r'r. .fir �`�;, ^' ^ter �' +.� �X 'L � Y•a r % {•�♦ �r r ' • • •' • ' / r + Y 4 AA W . • 1',= _� .......... � w nr::K; T. ;� f•. r \ •'. a: na, . f n •_ .. Y , /, n .r ... , /�;\: ;+..::Yt ♦,S .`" ' /.. j� ' ,� 7 Y }.. y r. ...... • •• +y • •' ' fir ! + •: -: ,• .t, , .. ':�,., .. ... z;.� . .. ••+r.(t ` Yin: ti,-.i :�: �.., .. ... ....... ....... .. .. ....... , ' •, � ..............w►.:.. `y- .. ..::. :......... .. ....... ,, �•' •r v, ... ..... 4. i• , :..........�.........s . _ ' ` s ».. .............. } ............... ............. s............................. yr '' F ... . mot ....I..... .Y r ... .............. ,.................�. »_......... ... .. » ....... ...� :.....•....,�.'; ..�'::: ..... wa »: T �:'4 ::. ♦ "a•I•...w.. I ..i'. «..w.. .......r ^ �' ti S.• . .,(.;... + , ` ....`.. .... .. .. +y1 r , •.�: ON }: •i.... ::.nf .. :)Y` ':: ?. ,,••• V • M1... i•,.; rrr {`' , , •.? [• �•... .. ... rjWNAAYf4VN.My�' • I r , .. •. L • . ,•• A v. !_• ` •!w wtiYr 8R j +.';.• r . , .. •. r r ... ..r' r•' /r �...... : S 7!T .. ` Dy > ,`. • .. ( :i. r A , a r w. Ja/ ; ;\ YJ,' a a. Y , {� � � ,.: .•. ,; r •. Y ; , STORM WATER .,DRA,rNAGE FACILITIES 5 Attachment Three 4 N RESOLUTION Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said city on the day of , 1986 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that the following described tax - forfeited land is required for drainage purposes: Outlot B. Maple Greens 1st Addition. (PIN: 25- 29 -22 -12 -0007) Maple Greens 3rd Addition PIN Lot 17, Block 1 (25-29-22-12-0022) Lot 18, Block 1 (25- 29 -22 -12 -0040) Lot 19, Block 1 (25- 29 -22 -12 -0039) Lot 20, Block 1 (25- 29 -22 -19 -0021) Outlot C (25-29-22-12-0008) WHEREAS, acquisition of the above- referenced parcels would be consistent with the city's drainage plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the proper city officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax- forfeited land for drainage purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax - forfeited land in the office of the land commissioner. Adopted this day of , 1986. Seconded by Ayes- - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. C I-TY OF MAPLEWOOD ) 6 Attachment Four I the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting - of. the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1986, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as. the same relates to this request for conveyance of tax - forfeited lands. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 19860 City Clerk City of Maplewood, Minnesota 7 MEMORANDUM T4: City Manager FROM: D of Community Development SUBJECT: Metro East Study DATE: May 5, 1986 R °Acti by Council; Endorsed ..._._..� Modified., Rej ecte Date Transfer $250 from the contingency account to pay for the city's share of the Metro East Study, Comments St. Paul and several east —side suburbs recentl y contracted with the. University of Minnesota to study the east —side area and develop ideas to capture more development and increase cooperation between St. Paul and its suburbs. Each city was asked to contribute part of the cost. A summary of the study is enclosed. Meetings with east side elected officials are being scheduled within the next five weeks to present the findings of .this study and discuss ways we can work together to p romote the east side. g Recommendation Approve a budget transfer of $250 from the contingency account to account 01- 4480 -71. jc DRAFT: METRO EAST MARKET STUDY Summary April 1, 1986 INTRODUCTION The Metro East Market Study is, a product of the common economic development concerns of planners representing several communities in the eastern half of the metropolitan area, In January 1986, the Metro East planners' group contracted with Humphrey Institute faculty Barbara Lukermann and the graduate planning workshop to study the character and image of the Metro East Area (MEA) compared to the metropolitan region as a whole. Specifically, the study's purpose was to propose a marketing strategy to promote devel opment opportunities in the MEA .and create a stronger sense of cohesion among the constituent communities. 'The Metro East Area, for the purpose of the study, includes all of Ramsey County, all of Washington County, a small portion of southeast Anoka County, and northern Dakota County, TNF PppnPTC The study results are presented in two reports: 1. Metro East Inventory -Profile This volume contains data on area socio- economic . characteristics, level of recent public /private investments, and land supply and demand projections, compared within the metropolitan regi on . The Inventory - Profile also contains the responses of "key informants" - individuals who influence economic development in the Metro East Area regarding their attitudes and .perceptions of the MEA' s growth potential, 2. Metro East Strate i c 0 ti ons. This report summarizes key findings from t e Inventory-Profile and recommends strategies for capturing a greater market share of economic development for the Metro East Area, The Strategic Options report is attached to this summary. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The statistical analysis and responses of the interview and focus group :.partici pants - revealed the following major points: 1 1. The MEA is a collection of uni ue communities with a diversity of charac- teristics and potential . The inventory presents data by the sub -areas of (1) St. Paul, (2) northern .Ramsey County, (3) Washington- southeast Anoka Counties, (4) St. Croix Valley, (5) west - central Washington County, and (6) northern Dakota County. These - boundaries are mapped , i n the attached report. While the report draws conclusions applicable to the Metro East in general , the sub -units display very distinct characteristics. Clearly indicated is the relative strength of recent growth in suburban Ramsey and northern Dakota Counties. More detailed review of the statistics reveals the particular strengths of each of the sub -area. The variations in demographics and development throughout the MEA are of particular interest for devising specific strategies. 29 The Metro East's share of regional devel o ment has been di s ro orti on- ately 1 ow, with recent rowth indicators achi evi n - onIX the traditional one -third share, or less The MEA accounts for: * 32% of 1980 regional population * 209 of 1970 -1980 regional population growth * 30% of 1970 -1980 regional urban land development * 31% of 1984 regional employment * 23% of 1980 -1984 regional. growth in housing units * 12% of 1980 -1984 regional growth in office construction value * 25% of 1980 -1984 regional growth in retail sal es /service construction v al ue * 32% of 1980 -1984 regional growth in industrial construction value Between 1971 -1984, two - thirds of MEA cities with over 9,000 population were fiscal disparities net recipients. This compared to just over half of l i k e non -MEA cities during. that period. .3. Metropolitan Council forecasts anticipate no significant shift in east vs. west growth patterns P roj ected. , sl ow down i n the pace of met ropol i tan growth wi 11 1 imi t, i n absolute terms, the amount of ,new 'devel opment. Growth patterns w i l l result not from increasing demand, but from shifting demand. The forecasts make no provision for such a shift in favor of the MEA. However, these projections are not intended by the Metropolitan Council to be predictors of growth. Rather they are seen as flexible, requiring regular monitoring and adjustment. 4. There are several positive statistical indicators for devel o ment in the MEA. * The MEA age pyramid is almost identical to the metropolitan region's, indicating a competitive labor force. Occupational - patterns are reflective of those of the region, * The average income of. the MEA is 4% higher than the regional average. * The MEA has approximately the same of higher income households as the region. * The MEA has 42% of the 1980 -1990 developable land supply of the metropolitan region (excluding St. Paul and Minneapolis). * MnDOT travel time projections to the year 2000 show reasonable accessibility of the MEA to both downtowns. 5. The MEA suffers from a negative image Interviews with real estate brokers, lenders, developers , business executives, and public officials reveal diverse, often contradictory, perceptions of the development potential of the Metro East Area. Those interviewed reported that development decision - makers not operating in the MEA, have at best, an ignorance about the eastern market and confusion over the MEA' s attitude toward development, or, at worst, a prejudice based on past anti-growth sentiment and failed economic development efforts, and a perception of the MEA as backward, unpresti gi ous, inaccessible, and lacking natural , cultural or entertainment amenities. 6. The MEA has several attractive qualities and opportunities for development. Countering the negative perceptions are the positive perceptions of individuals in the eastern development community. They include: A good quality of l i f e centered around family, schools, and recreational, cultural and entertainment facilities, * Available, affordable and accessible land for development, with I -94 and I -494 specifically cited as key to new development. * Pro - growth and cooperative local governments. * The potential for economic development including a good industrial base, employment opportunities, reasonable taxes and development incentives.. J., The MEA communities could attract a greater share of future growth by working together, while capitalizing on each community s particular assets 3 The key informants agreed that cooperative organization and strong leadership in the MEA is needed to aggressively promote economic development. - Just as important is the identification and marketing of the strengths of the individual communities . Cl ear communi cati on of a posi ti ve, prof essi onal atti tude toward growth was seen by the, development interests as essential i n order .to dispel negative perceptions . The regional policy makers also stressed developing a communi ty of interest and putting competitiveness aside. The regional policy-makers see themselves as market neutral and will not promote growth in one part of the region. It is incumbent upon the MEA to promote itself and demonstrate its potential, SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings and conclusions of the inventory-profile report, the study suggests several strategies. These are detailed in the attached Strategic Options report, In summary, the study recommends 1. Leadership and organization the community and MEA levels. 2. Aggressive marketing of the positive attributes of the MEA to developers, businesses and home buyers, 3. Cooperation between the suburban communities and St. Paul in sharing employment opportunities, housing markets, and professional and financial expertise. 40 Indentification and redefinition of study area sub -units according to compatible development goals.. 5. Exploitation of unique characteristics within the Metro East Area for targeting specific types of development. 6. Development of new financing mechanisms such as a joint nonprofit development corporation and public /private ventures. To achieve these broad recommendations, the report lists more detailed actions for marketing, networking, building community alliances, lobbying, and improving relations with developers, The study concludes .that, "It - is essential that the Metro East Area strike now to attract new d.evel opment i n , view of the- -slow growth projected for the Metropolitan Region." 4 Z -� MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Service District No. 6 Trunk Water Main and Tower City Project 86 -03 DATE: May 5, 1986 A ction by Couri a Endorsed, ___ 14odJ_f1'ed , R ejected, Date Attached is the feasibility report for the above —named project prepared by the city's consultant. This project was originally ordered as the Century Avenue Water Main and Tower Project, however, the consultant has, . fou-nd the Century Avenue alignment to be nonfeas i bl e due to conflicts with gas and electric mains and a lack of right —of— way, plus'. potenti for assessment was li The recommended alignment in this report is along 'Sterling Street through the Hillcrest property to the Beaver Creek Apartment comple and connection to the 16 —inch main in Ivy Avenue. The proposed water tower is unchanged from that proposed in the McKnight Road feasibility study that was presented to the council in April 1985, As an additional part of this study, the consultant studied the Beebe Road pumping station and the entire water service district's operation. The St. Paul Water Utility identified an inadequate source of supply to the pumping station that will require the 'construction of a supply suction main from the Hillcrest Reservoir. This construction will involve work in the City of St. Paul and w i l l cross private property in St. Paul, Two estimates for the construction of the suction main have b een prepared. Alternative No. 1 for construction across City of St. Paul property and private property, while Alte rnative No. 2 provides a longer route across o n l y City of St. Paul property. The final finding of the consultant's study was that with the addition of the recently approved McKnight Road project, the discharge main from the pumping station was not of adequate size to serve design flows. A parallel main from the pumping station to Larpenteur Avenue has been proposed to eliminate excess system pressures and to provide redundant service when repairs-or maintenance is needed. The total project cost has been at $2,091,000 for Al ternative No. 1 and $2,130,000 for Alternative No. 2. These costs include 10% for construction contingencies and 32% for indirect expenditures. In addition, it is estimated that 9 water services will be required to service abutting properties at a cost of $16,200 for a total project cost for Alternative 1 at $2,107,200, PROPOSED FINANCING The following financing proposal considers assessing benefited properties adjacent to the water main improvement on a front foot basis, benefited properties in Service District No. 6 on a unit charge basis, and city participation. The city participation would offset the cost of oversizing the 16 -inch diameter water main, p.umping.station improvements and a portion of the cost for the elevated tank, This participation would be by means of tax - increment financing. Water Main Lateral Assessment The proposed 16 -inch diameter trunk water m a i n would d i r e c t l y . serve the abutting properties along Sterling Street as a lateral facility. Assess- ing the total cost of this trunk water main to the abutting properties would not be equitable nor justifiable. We, therefore, have proposed to use a front foot assessment rate $25.00/F.F. which is considered to be compatible with current assessment rates for lateral water mains, and with the benefits received from a lateral facility. In addition to the front -foot assessment, any properties receiving water service stubs would be assessed the actual.cost of the service. Unit Charge Assessment Benefit from the construction of an elevated tank is proposed to be assessed on,'a per -unit charge basis. The unit charge is based on the anticipated water consumption within the highest and best use of the-property. This use is considered to be the current designated land use, as established in the adopted "Maplewood Comprehensive Plan." The base -unit charge has a flow equal to that from a single-family dwelling. For example, a typical multiple dwelling (duplex) is estimated to consume twice the flow of the single-family dwelling, and therefore the multiple dwelling is assigned 2 units while the . base unit, the single-family dw,el l i ng, is assigned 1 unit. Attached to this report is the computation data which uses population. density data, estimated per capita consumption rates and estimated acreage flows for various types of land uses to formulate the "unit charge." City Participation The cost of the city's portion of the project i s estimated. to be approxi- mately $1,000,000. This cost would offset the overs i z i ng of the 16 -inch water main, the pumping station improvements and a portion of the cost of the elevated tank. This participation is proposed to be by means of tax - increment financing, Alternative No. 1 is being used for this financing proposal . It is recommended that. if Alternative No. 2 must be pursued, that the. additional $39,000 be paid from the hydrant fund. 2 SUMMARY OF FINANCING Assmt Assmt Cost City Description Unit Unit Recovery Portion Sterling Street Trunk Main 2,6.50/FF Suction Main -- Elevated Tank and Federal Main 5, .321 /U. Discharge Main -- Water Services 9 EA. Total Project Cost Project Cost $25wOO/FF $ 66 $370. $ 437 000 — 0 113,000 113, 000 $192.50/U. 1,024, 383, 250 1 -- 0 133 133 $1800/EA., 16,200 0 16,200 $1 $1,000,000 $2,107, It is recommended that the council accept this report and order a public hear— ing. It is anticipated that there will be a large turnout for this public hearing due to the large area affected. The preliminary. date of Wednesday, May 28 has been set at a site to be determined. The council should confirm this date or set a new one. jw Enc. 3 UNIT CHARGE COMPUTATION DATA SHEET 1. CLASSIFICATION POPULATION DENSITY - Low Density Residential (RL) 11 Persons er Gross A P Ac M di e um Dense ty Residential al (RM) 20 Persons per. Gross Acre High Density Residential (RH) 34 Persons per Gross Acre 20 Population Densities for Residential Uses CLASSIFICATION DENSI Y T Single Dwelling 4.1 Persons /Dwel 1 i ng Double Dwelli n:g 4.1 Persons /DwelIin 9 Townhouse 3.3 P • Pe rsons/Dwellin g 9 .Apartment 2.2 we Persons Dl1i / ng . 3. Basis for Estimating W a t er • 9 ter Consumption on Undeveloped Land TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL USE PER CAPITA. CONSUMPTION RL RM 75 Gallons per Day _ _ RH per 75 Gallons p Day .70 Gallons per . Day TYPE OF NONRESIDENTIAL USE PROJECTED AREA FLOW OS P 0 Ga per Acre per Day Commercial 100 2000 Gallons p Acre per Day Gallons er er Acre e per Day 4. Basis for Determining g Water Consumption for D evelop ed Properties p . _ CLASSIFICATION CONSUMPTION. , S C � � A ._ ctual Consumption * NC Actual. Consumption ption ... R esidential 310 Gallons per Day B Dwel 1 i By 'Dwel Type Commercial Actual Consumption * Actual consumption based P on sewer billi • i ngs UNIT CHARGE EQUIVALENTS a. Currently Developed Parcels Land Use Ini Charge ' Single Dwelling = 4.1 eo le dwell. _ 1 P p / x 75 gal /p /day 31Q gal /dwell /day - 1 un Double Dwelling 4.1 peo 1 e /dwell . x 7 P 5 gal /p /day 310 gal/dwell/day - 1 uni Townhouse = 3.3 people /dwell . x 75 al = .. 9 /P /daY 250 g/d /day (250/310) - 1 unit Apartment = 2.2 people /dwell. x 70 al = � 9 /p /day 100 g/d /day (150/310 j - ; un t Business, Commercial, 1985 water usage Schoo and Church 365 x 310 X units b. Undeveloped Parcels wi ll b • e based on projected land use flows RL = 11 people /acre /4.1. eo 1 e = • . p p /unit 3 dwellings/acre 1 i ngs /acre • 3 units /ac RM = 20 people /acre /4.1 people /unit 5. dwe11 i _ ngs. /acre - 5 uni is /ac. RH = 34 people /acre /4.1 peopl /unit = 8. dw ell� ' ngs /acre = 8 units ac "Park = 100 gal /ac /day /310 dal/ unit/day 1/3 unit Nonresidential = 2,000 al acr 9 / e /day /310 gal/unit/day 6 unit/ac RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improve— ment of Water Service District No. 6 by construction of trunk water main, pump station improvements, and water tower, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1 . The report of the c i t y engineer advising t h i s council that the proposed improvement of Water Service District No. 6 by construction of trunk water main, pump station improvements, and water tower is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,107,200,00. 3. A public hearing will be held at a site to be determined by the city engineer on Wednesday, the 28th day of May, 1986, at 6 p. m. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law, Z"_ 5 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: New City Hall DATE: May 5, 1986 Change Order 2 The attached Change order 2 relates to city requested changes, contractor requested changes and code compliance issues. A- more detailed description of the work is included in the attached Project Directives 8 11, The total change orders are less than one — half -of one percent of the total contract. It is recommended the city council approve Change Order 2 in the amount of $9,875,00, CHANGE ORDER Project Maplewood City Hall/ Number 2 Public Safety Facility .Date May 1, 1986 Commission No. 8467 Owner City of Maplewood Contractor Knutson Construction Company 1380 Frost Avenue 5301 East River Road Maplewood., MN 55109 Minneapolis, MN 5542 It is hereby mutually agreed that when this Change Order has been signed by the contract'i ng parties, the following described changes in this Contract shall be executed by the Contractor and shall change this Contract as herein stipulated and agreed. Project Directive No. 8, dated January 29 1986 (Widen stair; add i. ti onal securi. ng of concrete sills) Project Di recti -ve No. 9, dated February 20, 1986 (Ad'ditional fire extinguishers. Increase curta n wall height at Rooms '230 and" 301) Project Directive No..10,. dated March* 3, 1986 (Code related improvements and deletions. Additional el ectri cl work) Project Directive No. 11, dated March 20, 1986 (Hardware revisions, closet ceilings., millwork revisions) Revise water service - to be 4" D. I . P, is n lieu of 2 " copper TOTAL CHANGE (ADD) $ 1,982.00 1,912.00 472.00 3,609.00 1,900.00 $ 9,875.00 The on gi nal Contract Sum was ............. ............................... $ 2,574,100.00 Net change by previous Change Orders ...... ............................... $ ' 3 035-00 The Contract Sum prior-to this Change Order was .......................... $ 2, 577,1.35.00 The Contract Sum - will be (increased) k*WMWR � by this Change Order .............................. .............................$ 9.875.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be ................. $ 2,587 1 010.00 The Contract Time w i l l be (unchanged) by ......... ( - ) Days The Date of Completion, as of the date of this Change Order therefore is July' 3., 1986 APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: ACCEPTED BY: Architect Contractor Owner Date Da to Da to THE ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE aWClifmn Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55W3 612/871-5= Pro ect Directive In i tiated Number of By: X Owner --�-- Architect Co ies: 2 P _______ Owner Haider, de r , Ostrom ' Contractor 2 ---- Architect Ketcham V � esterhoi t ---- Other __ 5 Contractor 1 Other MBJ 1 Other (LWSM) PROJECT: Map City Hall/ COMM ISSION NO: 8467 Public Safety Facility OWNER: City of Mapl ewood ARCHITECT: Architectural i C c tectural Ailiance 1380 Frost Avenue 400 Clifton Avenue Maplewood MN 65109 South Minneapolis, MN 55403 CONTRACTOR: Knutson Construction DIRECTIVE NO: 8 East River Road Bus, Ctr, 5301 East River Road #101 DIRECTIVE DATE: January 29 1986 Min y s nea of i s MN 55421 You are hereby directed to execute t rom • p ply this Dir ective ve why ch interprets the Contract Documents or orders changes in the Work. If requested by this Directive, please submit an i temi zed r p oposal to Architect- ural Alliance for the Work described below. If your proposal i s found to b 1 a author p p e sat satisfactory a nd i n proper order, you will be to proceed with the Work. If required, this Directive will be incorporated into a future e Change Order. Description and Additions to Attachments: 1. Submit itemized cost adjustment w breakd - onto Architectural Alliance for the work described. 2. Refer to Directive No.. 8 Description. Attachments: Listing of attached do • currents that support description. Y 1. Project Directive No. 8 Description. 6 -2. Project Directive Drawing P.D. 8.1 By: Date: January 29, 1 986 ec u raay)AI Arc Da nce 400 Clifton Avenue South. Minre,1r)0hS. Minne "ta 5.S4M 19. Interchange doors 116 and 306. Locate so the swi n against y g g inst walls. 2. Widen stair C14 to be 2' -6" wide out to out. Cut recast concrete p o Crete plank as required to make this change. Install masonry wall ties as required to locate north walls of Interview Rooms further to the south. 3, Accomplish securing of precast-concrete lintels n 1 ' . 9 P to s along grid line 6 per attached Drawing No. P.D. 8.1. GuRT& iN wA-L.,L Z GtA-LV /8 4:v4 . STL . STOPS @ !(o" O.G, W/ 2"t )C14. 5 /8' � SRO /r'• T. Ga,vG PLAIV PIES �AtE O SELL • Architectural Alliance ce •'°"`• T•`• M�EwooD G r 1'`( Date � 2 q biv Revised Tel 612/871-5703 h 4p WOM H COMM. No. Dravin No. 0 lD Title GANG - � I U� 1, 4/P IV I / SEAt-^VT boo fstttM / r�R�itST coNC. I c. s� CI-fp ms's r" FAS PpLTS. (27 BoLTs ?e LEAr re OF kftLe IN Vae S/t74LL BG— Z /¢ F ROH BoTT. OF L . 4 *4* 4 RErrovc J2" WIPB7 PM Tt 0 &r OF Z" 9 1 C-1--ID INS,. P 3 6 " atc /�JA�D f'OVP CpB�' P« . �r, S pre, . Initiated Number of By: X ' Owner Copies: 2 Owner Haider, Ostrom Vo _X Architect � Architect Ketcham, Vesterhol t Contractor _ 1 Contractor Other 1_ Other (MBJ) Wi ehl e 3 Other AWSM) Gow, Corker , y Potvi n PROJECT: Maplewood City Hall/ Public Safety F a c i l i t y OWNER: Ci of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 COMMISSION NO: 8467 ARCHITECT. Architectural Alliance 400 Clifton Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55403 CONTRACTOR: Knutson Construction DIRECTIVE NO: 9 , East River Road Bus. Ctr. 5301 East River Road #101 DIRECTIVE DATE: February 20 1986 Minneapolis, MN 55421 You are hereby directed to execute promp this Directive which interprets the Contract Documents or orders changes in the Work. If requested by this Directive, please submit an itemized proposal to Architect- ural Alliance for the Work described below. If your proposal is found to be satisfactory and in proper order, you will be authorized to proceed. with the Work. If required, this Directive will be incorporated into a future Change Order. Description and Additions to Attachments. 1. Submit itemized cost ad justment breakdown to Architectural Alliance for the work described. 2. Refer to Project Directive No. 9 Description. Attachments: Listing of attached documents that support description. 1. Project Directive No. 9 Description. By: Date: February 20, 1986 u Architectural Alliance 4 00pihOnAvent ,e$pufh.MinreaDOkS.Minnesota 55403 MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL Project Directive No. 9 Description February 20, 1986 GENERAL WORK L Provide (1) additional fire extinguisher and ' . g Cosmopolitan tan 1039 - F10 cabinet for Room 414, 2. Provide (5) additional fire extinguishers and 9 Cosmopolitan 1037 - F10 cabinets for Rooms 205, 213 217 310 and 325. 30 Revise fire extinguisher cabinets for Rooms 107 and 122 to be Panorama 1035 -C71. 40 Revise curtain wall height at Rooms 230 and 301 t b " i o e5 -4 in lieu of 4' -8 ". A w•:.,.. .:. . .....c .:,,<. ,..; :. ... ._,: .. -... .... :_.:._:- .:a..rz n.... .. ,esr'T .r. ,,3.., v,.+...sa.. u ir. ..ra.ewx.: a. c _ _.xu•_ +.++c..w.: -° :awcc r.. ... -r+ w. :�.. _.- ...>4 .. :. ;..i;.,. ,.:l:..i.. '.. _ _ _ _._. 1.rL;:. Y+sbL2t..iw'SS.9a' Z'w...i r i,.A SY.r MOD roject D t _ _ _ _ ,+ttF2'S b.w .ti ... _._ • , ,,...... Initiated Number of Sy: owner Copies: .._._Z..�. owner . Hai der, Ost Architect � Architect Ketcham, Vesterhol Contractor _5 Contractor x other (State Code Review) 1 Other (MBJ) Wiehle 3 Other (LWSM) Gow, Corkery, Potvin PROJECT: Maplewood City H all/ COMMISSION NO: 8467 Public Safety Facility OWNER: City of Maplewood ARCHITECT: Architectural Al l fance 1380 Frost Avenue 400 Clifton - Avenue South Maplewood, MN 55109 Minneapolis, MN 55403 CONTRACTOR: Knutson Construction DIRECTIVE NO: 10 East River Road Bus. Ctr. 5301 East River Road #101 DIRECTIVE DATE: March 3, 1986 Minnea of i s , MN' 55421 You are hereby directed to execute promptly this Directive which interprets the Contract Documents or orders changes in the Work. If requested by this Directive, please submit an itemized proposal to Architect- ural' Alliance for the Work described below. If your proposal is found to be satisfactory and in proper order, you will be authorized to proceed with the Work.. If required, this Directive will be incorporated into a future Change Order. Description and Additions to Attachments: 1. Submit itemized cost adjustment breakdown to Architectural Alliance for the work "described. 2. Refer to Project Directive No. 10 Description. Attachments: Listing of attached documents that support description. 1. Project Directive No. 10 Description. 2. Project Directive No. 10 Drawing P.D. 10. Architectural Afl*iance 4000Iifton Avenue South. Minnea0dis. Minnesota 55403 Date ,__ March 3. 1986 MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL Project Directive No. 10 Descripti March 3, 1986 GENERAL WORK 1. Refer to Room 405, Booking. The two column enclosures shall be of 2- hour rated construction in order to maintain Building T y p e e II -FR rating. Refer to attached drawing P.D. 10/4/A8.10 2. The shaft south of Room 110 conference shall be 1-hour « " � u rated. Use .type X gypsum board both sides of studs around shaft. ELECTRICAL WORK 1. The lighted sign shall be relocated from north exterior wall near door 335 to center of north exterior wall (notched area) between grid lines 13 and 14, Provide flush mounted J -box in wall. Provide 1/2 «C and 2 #12 to .exterior soffit type «T" lighting fixture circuit (approx. 10' away). Verify sign J -box l ocation, Abandon J -box and conduit previously installed at existing 1 ocati on. Cover opening pe ing with matching exterior finish. 2. Delete exit signs and assoc. conduit and wire shown on east side of door 310, at door 323 and at north end of hallway 321. Provi a single face exit sin (relocated from hal lwa g y 323 o ) n ceiling on west side of door 336. 3. Provide duplex receptacle and 120 volt circuit connections to serve electric water coolers in hallway 211 and hallway 321. Verif y receptacle mounting height with Mechanical Contractor. ARIA OBC . UtYEe CT Or ff �TYP �D STL C OZOO . -7 ft, lob of/ N STUDS S67.fi�eE STvos � PBR y�c VIPF PY&,iFF 4AFJAr�j Ut S. of ? PtAAAC . ,cEF. E 7A- /L ......................... too# • Architectural Alliance "°" Yh'ft -tom Date z z8 8(0 ������.� MPrPLE W00D G/T Tel Revised Comm. No* Drawin No. ntu GOLUilN ENG� -. DE'T'L . BOOM 9 j'•D. /O ¢�f(S, / r oject Directive t 1 i t i a ted Number of By: x Owner Copies 2 Owner, �iaider, strom Architect 2_ Archi Ves terhol t Contractor 5 Contractor Other 1 Other MBJ 1 LWSM. PROJECT: Maplewood City Hall/ COMMISSION NO: 8467 Publ Safety Facility OWNER: - City of Maplewood ARCHITECT: Architectural Alliance 1380 frost Avenue 400 Clifton Avenue South Maplewood, MM 55109 Mi nneapolis, MN 55403 CONTRACTOR: Knutson Construction DIRECTIVE NO: 11 East River Road Bus. Ctr. 5301 East River Road #101DIRECTIVE DATE: March 20, 1986 Minneapolis, MN 55421 You are hereby directed to execute promptly this Directive which i nterprets the Contract Documents or orders changes in the Work. If requested by this Directive, please submit an itemized proposal to Architect- ural. Alli for the Work described below. If your proposal is found to be satisfactory and in proper order, you will be authorized to proceed with the Work. If required, this Directi w i l l be incorporated into a future Change Order. Description and Additions to Attachments: 1. Submit itemized cost adjustment breakdown to Architectural Alliance for the work described. 2. Refer to Directive No. 11 Description. -- Attachments: Listing of attached documents that support description. Y 1. Project Directive No. 11 Description. By: Architectural Alliance 400 Cldton Avenue South, Minneapoks, Minnesota 55403 Tel 612/871-5703 Date : March 20, 1986 PROJECT DIRECTIVE N0. 11 DESCRIPTION: March 20, 1986 City Hal l IPubl .i c Safety Facility Maplewood, Minnesota Commission No 8467 A. GENERAL WORK 1. Provide door closers for the. (6) toilet entry doors 105, 106, 209, 210 319 and 320. 2. Revise door closer type for doors 335, 335A and 414 to be No. 5030 in l i e u of No, 2030, 30 Revise steel stud gauge in south wall of Room 101 to -be 16 au e in l i e u of 20 gauge. 9 9 4. Provide gypsum baord ceilings at 8'-0" A.F.F. in closets, Room 109A 215A 229A 312A and 322A. 5. Revise cord length in City Council table to be 24'-3" in lieu of 20 , i.e., counter to consist of (9) in l i e u of (7) equal ' spaces. Increase raised portion behind Council table accordingly. 60 Provide in Room 405 a plastic laminate faced storage cabinet, wall hung. Overall length 12'-0", clear inside height V-2% , depth 18" Cabinet to have (3) vertical partitions and (8) adjustable shelves. No doors or hardware. 7. Delete specified cabinet hinges and magnetic catches, Provide concealed, self - closing Grass 1000 series hinges (or similar ) in lieu. B. ELECTRICAL WORK 1. Provide and install two additional P22 light fixtures in City Council table. 2. Delete (2) exit signs at northern portion of Room 211. MEMORANDUM TO: City manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Century Avenue DATE: May 5, 1986 Action by Council Endorsed..-.__.. Mo di f Rejected. -., The City of Woodbury recently contacted Maplewood to discuss upgrading of Century Avenue from Lower Afton Road'to south of I -494. Woodbury has approved additional development and road construction in this area. Maplewood is also experiencing requests fore additional development south of Lower Afton Road. The results will be increased traffic on Century Avenue from both cities. Ramsey and Washington Counties' the agencies responsible for the subject roadway. Neither county includes this section of Century Avenue on their 5 --year C.I.P. at this time. The Woodbury City Council has adopted a resolution requesting the counties to include upgrading in their 5 —year C. I . P. ' so It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution. WHEREAS, Century Avenue serves as a major transportation facilit y in the Ci of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, Century Avenue is in a deteriorated condition and needs to be upgraded to a higher design standard to meet projected transportation needs; and WHEREAS, Century Avenue, County Road 72, is under 'the joi � t jurisdiction of Ramsey and Washington Counties; and WHEREAS, Century Avenue is not currently included in Ramse y and Washington Counties' capi tal improvement programs., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the C y of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: Ramsey and Washington Counties are hereby r q uested to inc lude the reconstruction and upgrading of Century Avenue, County Road 72 from Lower Afton Road to south of I -494 in their five —year capital improve ment prog K ' F . , MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: City Manager RE: Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce Proposal for Economic Development Promotional Program DATE: May 7, 1986 1- Aoti on by, C ounc i 1: K. Endors \9 ..- o dif i e Be eete at This has been under di scu.ss i on and is. presented for your consideration, DLL: Inb ^o 'b 0 �te� ° o► 0 of C4 Division of Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce 2489 RICE STREET • ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 TELEPHONE: 612/483-1313 April 25 1986 Donald Lais City of Mapl 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Lai s Attached is the final, proposal of the No. St. Paul /Maplewood / Oakdale .Chamber of Commerce for a six month trial program to promot economic development in our area. This program proposal. and the proposed funding arrangement has been approved by the Chamber Board for presentation to the Cities and the School District for approval and funding. s Please schedule this matter on a City Council agenda as soon as possible. I have taken the liberty to draft a resolution for your use (attached to the proposal) . Please let me know when this item is scheduled to be presented to your City Council. The Chamber President and I plan to attend to answer any questions. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 779-2207. Sincerely, Cli ton J. Aichinger Vice President Elect Division of Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce 2489 RICE STREET • ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA. 55113 TELEPHONE: 612/483 -1313 PROPOSAL for ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM SPONSORED BY NO* 5T . PAUL /MAPLEWOOD / OAKDALE CHAMBER Off` COMMERCE e. =i NU.'S'T. PAUL /MAPLEWOOD /OAKDALE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BACKGROUND The No. St Paul /Maplewood /Oakdale Chamber of Commerce has had a long standing g goal to help the three Chamber communities expand commercial and industrial development. In an effort to implement . a program designed to achieve this goal, the Chamber has developed this proposal. The Chamber Board believes strongly that there are excellent development opportunities in the three Chamber communities that are not widely recognized y gnized by the Twin Cities business community. There are social, educational economic, transportation and governmental benefits to be offered to businesses locating in our area. These benefits need to be extolled and promoted. This proposal is supported by the Chamber Board of Directors as a reasonable initial program scope and cost. This proposal suggests a shared cost for this program to be split between the three Cities, the School District and the Chamber. The program budget and proposed cost share by each is presented below. The initial proposal is for a six month trial program. This proposal suggests that the project costs be shared among the e Cities , School District, and the Chamber since all are benefited by the project. Future support from the Real Estate Agencies and Brokers will be solicited following implementation of the program. Any support from Realtors or through advertising revenues will apply toward the continuation of the program or be refunded to the contributors to the project. OBJECTIVES o To expand industrial and commercial development within the three Chamber cities. o To increase Twin City business community exposure to the economic development opportunities in the Chamber Division area. o To increase awareness of the business and social benefits in the area. o To publicize our desire for business growth. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This proposal includes a two phased promotional program including media advertising and a newsletter. 1. A monthly Business Development Opportunities Newsletter. This 4 to 6 page g newsletter would list currently available property, buildings and businesses for sale or lease in the area. Each listing would be keyed to a map of the Chamber Division area. Z. An advertising program would be developed for Twin City Business Publications. The ad would be designed to draw attention to the division area, our desire for business growth, and the available newsletter. The ad would prompt readers to call for a copy of the newsletter. NEWSLETTER FORMAT o SIZE: 8 1/2 x 11 - 4 to 6 pages depending on number of listings and advertising. o Two columns per page. o One color printing with possible second color header and logo on top of first page. o Folded to fit in #10 business envelope. Other Chamber, City or School District materials could also be included. Use Chamber Division envelopes. o Mailed first class to individuals or companies requesting information. A mock -up newsletter is attached to this proposal. This is a rough layout only. Suggestions for modification are welcome. A final layout would be presented to the Chamber Board for approval prior to printing the first issue. BUDGET All cost shown below are estimates: 1. One time costs Ad Design /Keylining $250.00 Newsletter Layout Boards /Header Design 200.00 Map Drafting 75,00 Sub Total $525.00 2. Monthly Costs Front page article writing /solicitation /editing $ 50.00 Ad Placement Costs (paid to Business Publications) 500.00 Obtaining listings /contacts /newsletter ad sales 100.00 Mapping 50.00 Word Processing 50000 Layout 75.00 Printing 150.00 Responding to newsletter request, mailing, postage 50 * 00 Sub Total $1,025.00 Six Month Program Cost (Approximate) $6,675.00 FINANCING It is proposed that this project be sponsored by the North St. Paul, Maplewood, Oakdale Chamber of Commerce, the three member cities, and the Independent School District #622. The costs of the project would be underwritten by these entities in the following percentages: City of City of City of Indepen Chamber No.. St. Paul 15% Maplewood 25% Oakdale 25% dent School District 622 25% of Commerce 10% $1,000 1,670 1,670 1,670 6 $6,675 2 PROPOSAL Organization Management Services (OMS), a local ,business service firm, member of the Suburban Area Chamber and Local Division Board Member, would be authorized to administer and complete this project for the local Chamber division for a fee based on expenses as itemized above, under a six month trial contract. OMS would develop the advertising layout, newsletter layout, obtain real estate listings and ads with the assistance of city staff and Real Estate agents, publish the monthly newsletter, place business publication ads, and send the monthly newsletter to interested individuals and businesses. The mailing list would be developed through responses. to the business publication ads, and from lists available through the Cities. All revenues from the sale of ad space or line listings in the newsletter would be paid to the local division for use in extending the program if supported by the financial supporters. The financial supporters would transfer funds to the Chamber of Commerce upon approval. The Chamber of Commerce would pay monthly claims presented by OMS. 3 O lewo O m POIR 7 -.--I E_. .;;'" �046) -�d''+b - -_ - N.S( -. pail- tv1�91ewx J- p�lcd Cho�.. � (�,,,m�,. Diviswn off' SACG . C6�z) 483-1319 - MO�thI- - Fc,��,xe.— � lil 1 .__�• •• - '' ► . 'f �• Lt.�l.� iL:t;t '/f�� ii !/' , /,t! �rl�t ;,f '; ► t f t • • !r! �� r t ! �. �_ ___ _• � _...: .. _.:r. r ._ • - _:. �at� _� j, t l 1 ��� ? t : t t r t t �.• — t ! - - f , . l '�:� —t. Lc�tA� l�.l�lJ �,,`.l.t.:t� Lt.t.cu.(t. � '11 ' �•�C(.�•�c„! `` �. � -- ._.i_____ 1 t off �. A t.t _ ,. rt t ���! 1 �'�'�.U.Jt �: (.�.� •. --- - - - -'— — n. "'_ r`� ./'W •�♦.•l/t U V" �`_� �I'��1�� 1/�I� 1 f • •' / ♦. �;�` ,• -._+�. ` •- .-M..� r.__.- .- _._.r.- ..__�._•_......��s7. -- _- -r.... ___r Jq t A- --- �i�L: "�'��.L,,,�� ._�•.__;'�� E •'.� -:�' �, .t � !� `'• �. r � fit- . �.. •.t, ►l �`t r� "��. i�. •. _��t ' r•' t .�,t '• I J.A. A ' r r C! i WAA t.v I�l .t �. �,c ,C. �. t•u 1 J lw 1, u, t,ut, . _ !j.! ._ ti• ' '•- -� r�_s�r. i,l t.! -�.t,t i..�•. (. ,�, >> ! t....._ ! ti�� J± � t ► _•( .! !.- L► t �.t t_.. t ;.. �. ,. - ---- - - t. ., t.v (A -W. �l�(,{_ l�vv ��• tn�t�,t� tit. - :rt/l!t_ .�___ t .L'i/S�,r - __ __ _ �..� .���.�.�.� � `•a..i.�._ -. '„! ��___ �•�l. 1. C.�•. l � �. t .� t� �t� � r �/ "_���_ ILI t�� U` t t ,lt,� x . �. �' t� '� -'4��. t t �I�c (. V �, -- �.. I�.w ��..c�: ��.r �, t t�••�l, c - ``, � 4JO, UL �Ul G l Vic% (• s t �• t • :, r ��.. ( A - 1.�.t, �., Uf -- _. t t t�.� •LV ht.cu,c� w t."UA �. lv t: ( 40 . 00000000000, iN 'IN 1 al%lwmw� JQ� R WE maw iRry For Rejm4w/ L seso MAP LA A I J.000.w A. UJ A..o L LO AA 40 . 00000000000, iN it Busl NE OPPORTUN (TIES f to U) .40 U-,I-u V-U-u Ujj-u UI.-Luj Uju LLUJ Ujjjjv Luj L) U, Lot, i s JJJ L UU Ua-A kk" 1- _) LA.& Udk t, uA uLA UJJ UAU LA-u VvIJt.� ULAA- VjA.Aj kII" L" t �j U.AAJ LUAA� LkA.,$J V.-AAJ WA,,t VAAJ VJ-4) Vlow LMu U-w U-kv-) W% tool"W Ik LTV Ukkow I LAW Lol Lw u UAI 11At (] -- L %.A• 0 10 , L-�- 1 1 J-0 Uu-) �J_uuj k .*.* -JO I j..j.t I J ij) I I ,I if ' • Lk.k." Wild t .tef . U ,L U LA Lw V-A-v �ukj LL4V � G4 UJU U,4.A.; ol wo u V%A..AJ UA.,)- LW U_Aj ULAJ, w-W W.AJ V _iAL U A-L "Ij_) `;_tom _AA.A,' ; U U.-j-u I ',,.'Aj t 1 l 1 t 1 fill #I f A. A. LW k J A_XU k 1A kJ (Ai !AAA) (Illf I fie 3 1 s if U-,I-u V-U-u Ujj-u UI.-Luj Uju LLUJ Ujjjjv Luj L) U, Lot, i s JJJ L UU Ua-A kk" 1- _) LA.& Udk t, uA uLA UJJ UAU LA-u VvIJt.� ULAA- VjA.Aj kII" L" t �j U.AAJ LUAA� LkA.,$J V.-AAJ WA,,t VAAJ VJ-4) Vlow LMu U-w U-kv-) W% tool"W Ik LTV Ukkow I LAW Lol Lw u UAI 11At (] -- L %.A• 0 AREA -MAP 0 00 PC i Lim I c • 40 leow cAfta rA 014 WOO A @A 13 UA, SRI L c Hi' MAP L.&Vz Orit Pit Ce-..,, Di v i .5 i 0 &n 0 �. -�"_�. V7 -7 70 0000 f ((Piz) qb ____ _ _ _- ___ �, k. r ,� Avc -C, hL 0 1 DRAFT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood desires to increase industrial and commercial development in the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood will benefit from additional development through increased revenues, employment, and secondary economic benefits; and, WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood recognizes that a joint program sponsored by the City of Maplewood and the City of No. St. Paul, City of Oakdale, and the ISD #622 would be a cost effective and mutually beneficial approach; and WHEREAS, The No. St. Paul /Maplewood /Oakdale Chamber of Commerce has developed an Economic Development Promotional Program to be jointly funded by the Chamber, the member cities, and the ISD #622. The Chamber is requesting that each of the entities share in the cost of a six month trial program at a total cost of $6,675; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood participate in funding this program by providing 25% of the project cost, or $1,670, and that these funds shall be immediately transferred to the No. St. Paul /Maplewood /Oakdale Chamber of Commerce.