HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 04-14 City Council PacketAGENDA
Maplewood City Council
7:00 P.M.,'Monda April 14, 1986
Municipal Administration Buildin
M 86-09
A) CALL TO ORDER
B) ROLL CALL
JQ APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1* Meetin 86-08, March 24, 1986
ID) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E) CONSENT AGENDA
10 Accounts Pa
2* Disposal of Old Financial Records
3* Amendment of Tanners Lake Partners Project 1982 .'R Note4eFinalPlat: Cave's En St. JAddi ti on5* Budget Transfer From Contin Transcriber6eRosevilleWaterService
7* Water Service - Little Canada
8,9 Accept Donation - Paramedic Fund
F) _PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 - PUD Revision Caves En Street Addition
20 PUD Preliminar Plat an Street Vacation:
Cave's En Street 2nd Addition
34, 7:20 - Code 'Amendment: Parkin (2nd Readin Votes)
4* 7:30 - Crestview Drive-Hudson Place Watermain (4 Votes)
5* 7:50 - Holida Inn: Li License
G) AWARD OF BIDS
10 Ambulance
H) --UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Condor Storm Sewer
2* Count Solid Waste Plan
3. Neighborhood Park Acquisition
II) NEW BUSINESS
1• Code Amendment: Home Occupationupaton Signs 1st Reading)
20 Reschedule May 26 Council M 'eeting
30 Art Contests - Ci Hall
4. Ramsey Co. 1986 Contract - Overlay Program
5 • White Bear Ave. Pavementement Reh ablitation
6. Frost Avenue Reconstruction - Project 83 -
7• Hazelwood Reconstruccton - Project 85 -27
80 McKnight Road Reconstructionn - Project 81 -20
9 - Purchase of Radio E uig preen t
VISIT -OR PRESENTATIONS
K) "1--1___ COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
CM) ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, March 24, 1986
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 86 -08
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present
Charlotte Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Meeting No. 86 -97 (March 10, 1986)
Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 86 -07
March 10, 1986) as submitted
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended
1. Beam and White Bear Avenues
2. English Street and Highway 36
3. Arts - Task Force
4. Delete Item I -8
5. Correct Item I -5
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Anderson moved, Seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - Mayor Greavu
Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian, and Juker, Councilmember Wasiluk abstained
to aDDrove the Consent Agenda. Items 1 through 4, as recommended:
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the Accounts (Part I, Fees, Services, Expenses Check register dated
March 12 through March 14, 1986 - $532,182.48: Part II, Payroll dated March
7, 1986 - gross amount $137,999.76; Payroll dated March 21, 1986 - gross
amount $133,883.74) in the amount of $804,065.98.
3/24
2 Land Transfer
Resolution No. 86 - 3 - 36
WHEREAS, Ramsey County gained fee title in 1924 to an alley -like parcel
in Block one, Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition to Lakeside Park for unknown
reasons;
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Land Commissioner has stated that Ramsey County
has no use for said parcel;
WHEREAS, on August 6, 1981, the City of Maplewood declared that the City
has no use for the said parcel except for the retention of a utility easement
over the west ten feet;
WHEREAS, each of the adjoining property owners has declared an interest in
obtaining the portion of said parcel that abuts their property;
WHEREAS, the City proposes to apply to the county pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 282.01, to acquire property for public purpose to convey portions
thereof to the owners of abutting land to create additional side and rear
yards;
WHEREAS, it appears in the public interest to combine said parcel with the
abutting property for the purpose of returning the land to the tax rolls and
to promote the continued maintenance of said parcel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that appli-
cation is hereby made to Ramsey County seeking conveyance pursuant to the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes 282.01, of the parcel herein described for
the purpose of transfer to owners of the abutting properties, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Ramsey County provides good and marketable title to Maplewood
at the county's expense.
2. Twenty -five dollars shall be escrowed with the City from each
abutting property owner to pay for the City Attorney's time to
prepare and record the necessary deeds. Any unused funds will be
refunded.
3. A utility easement shall be retained over the west ten feet of the
north /south portion of the alley -like parcel.
3 Tax Forfeit Land Transfer Program
Resolution No. 86 - 3 - 37
WHEREAS, there presently exists within the City of Maplewood certain
parcels of land which cannot be improved because of noncompliance with
the City's zoning code regarding minimum area, shape, frontage or access;
and
WHEREAS, three of said noncomplying parcels have been purchased from
Ramsey County by prospective developers; and
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has consistently denied approval of
2 -3/24
requested variances with reference to similar size parcels as homesites;
and
WHEREAS, judicial challenges of the City's denial of requested vari-
ances have been sustained; and
WHEREAS, the processing of these variance requests with reference to
noncomplying parcels is an unproductive use of the City's resources; and
WHEREAS, the City proposes to apply to the County of Ramsey pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, 282.01, to acquire property for public purpose to
convey certain of said parcels to owners of lands adjoining the tax - forfeited
parcels in question for the creation of additional side yards;
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to combine said parcels with abut-
ting property for the purpose of eliminating public nuisances and returning
to the tax rolls land otherwise unproductive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that appli-
cation is hereby made to Ramsey County seeking conveyance pursuant to the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes 282.01, those parcels of real property
hereinbelow described for the purpose of resale to owners of land adjoining
the land to be transferred hereby:
1. North 1/2 of vacated alley adjoining and Lot 1, Block 2, Pflueger's
Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota (12- 29- 22 -12- 0005 -9)
2. Vacated alley accruing and following, Lot 16, Block 5, Gladstone,
Ramsey County, Minnesota (15- 29- 22 -32- 0069 -1)
3. Lot 27, Block 1, Warren and Flints Addition to the City of St. Paul
15- 29- 22 -34- 0079 -2)
4. Outlot C, Maple Greens First Addition (25- 29- 22 -12- 0098 -0)
5. Lot 4, Block 1, Edgerton Highlands (17- 29- 22 -21- 0013 -6)
6. South 169 1/10 feet of North 392 1/10 feet of following described
part of Northeast 1/4 of Section 4 beginning on North line of and
5 feet west from the Northeast corner of Section 4 thence east 5
feet thence south 471 feet thence west 15 feet thence northerly
741 3/10 feet to beginning in Section 4, Township 29, Range 22
4- 29- 22 -11- 0001 -4)
7. West 33 feet of part south of highway of Southeast 1/4 (subject to
road) in Section 35, Township 30, Range 22 (35- 30- 22 -43- 0002 -4)
8. Outlot B, Maple Greens First Addition (25- 29 -22 -12 -0007)
Recording of deeds for each land transfer is subject to:
1. Receipt of cash escrow for each property to be transferred to
cover the cost of county fees and City Attorney preparing and
recording the necessary deeds.
3 - 3/24
2. Interior lots shall be split equally between property owners
along the same street, unless otherwise agreed to by the adjacent
owners.
4. Public Safety Dispatching Agreement With City of North St. Paul.
Approved the annual dispatching agreement between the City of North St. Paul
and the City of Maplewood as presented.
E -A SHORT PRESENTATION BY DIRECTOR OF EAST COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTER
Ms. Terry Anderson, Maplewood's representative to the East Community Family Center
introduced Ms. Cathy Jesperson, Director of East Community Family Service. Ms.
Jespersen explained the functions of this service.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. - Connemara /Condor Storm Sewer
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
proposal to construct a storm sewer from Londin Lane across the Connemara
property to Johnson's pond.
b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
C. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the proposal.
d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for and against
the proposal. The following explained their views:
Mr. Arnie Johnson, .2299 Londin Land
Mr. Dick Martinson, Connemara II resident
Mr. John Pecchia, Attorney representing Arnie Johnson
Mr. Jerry Johnson, Connemara resident
Mr. Gary Grant, Mary Anderson Construction
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Mayor Greavu moved to order the project.
Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the meeting of April
4, 1986, and direct Staf to contact affected owners to explain the proposal.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
g. Council established a shirt sleeve session to be held March 31, 1985,
at 6:30 P.M. to discuss the Connemara storm sewer.
2. 7:20 P.M. - Conner Avenue : Highway 61 to Maplewood Drive
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
construction of Connor Avenue from :Highway 61 to the east frontage road.
b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
4 - 3/24
C. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the proposal.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of a
street on Connor Avenue from Highway 61 to Maplewood Drive, a hearing on
said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on
March 24, 1986, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard
on the matter and has fully considered the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNE-
SOTA, as follows:
1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the City of
Maplewood construct a street on Connor Avenue from Highway 61 to
Maplewood Drive as described in the notice of hearing thereon,
and orders the same to be made.
2. The City Engineer is designated Engineer for this improvement
and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications
for the making of said improvement.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
3. 7:30 P.M., Cope Avenue - English Street Storm Sewer
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
proposal to construct a trunk storm sewer from Birmingham Street and County
Road B to Gerten Pond located north of Gervais Avenue.
b. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
c. Assistant City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the proposal.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard:
Mr. Sam Cave, Ed Cave and Sons.
Mr. Julius Loipersbeck, 2.156 English Street
Mr. Bob Hanson, 1384 Cope Avenue
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
5 - 3/24
g. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the Cope Avenue and English
Street Trunk Storm sewer project
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
None.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Crestview Drive - Hudson Place Water Main Project 85 -07
a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
ccF
WHEREAS, a public hearing was called by resolution for March 24,
1986, at 7:10 P.M. for the improvement of Water Service District 7
by construction of water main along Hudson Place and Crestview Drive,
City Project 85 -7, and
WHEREAS, proper notification was not given to all affected property
owners as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The public hearing called for March 24, 1986, at 7:10 P.M.
for the improvement of Water Service District 7 by construc-
tion of water main along Hudson Place and Crestview Drive,
City Project -85 -7, is hereby cancelled.
2. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 14th day of April,
1986, at 7:30 P.M. to consider said improvement. 'The City Clerk
shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and im-
provement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
2. Frost Avenue - Project 83 -1
a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
86- 3 -40
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on
February 10, 1986, plans and specifications for Frost Avenue recon-
struction from Adele to Birmingham, Project 63 -1, have been prepared
by the City Engineer and the Ramsey County Public Works Department,
who have presented such plans and specifications to the Council for
approval,
6 - 3/24
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed
on file in the office of the City Clerk.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk.
Nay - Councilmember Bastian.
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Hillwood Drive Petition for Public Improvement
a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
86- 3- 41
WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct street, sanitary sewer,
water main and storm sewer along the Hillwood Drive alignment from
approximately 155 feet east of Crestview Drive along the southern
boundary of Judge Kirby's property for approximately 583 feet and
to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of
the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer
for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with
all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as
to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it
should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other im-
provement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Juker and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Bastian.
2. Beam Avenue Reassessment - Project 78 -24
a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Wasiluk introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption
86 - 3 - 42
WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the
Council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of Project
78 -24 Beam Avenue Sanitary Sewer, and the said assessment roll is on
fil in the office of the City Clerk;
7 - 3/24
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 28th day of April 1986, at
the City Hall at 7:30 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assess-
ment and at such time and place all persons owning property
affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to
be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the
official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing,
and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected
by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and place
of hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the area
proposed to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll
is on file with the Clerk, and that written or oral objections
will be considered.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
3. Density Conversion Table (4 Votes)
a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
proposal.
c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission recommenda-
tion.
d. The following persons were heard regarding this proposal:
Mr. Gene Wilson
Mr. Sam Cave
Mr. Dick Schreier
Mr. Gary Grant
e. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption
86 - 3 - 43
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maple-
wood Comprehensive Plan to update the density conversion table on page
A -2 of the Plan.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March
24, 1986, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was
published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written
8 - 3/24
statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said plan amendment be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on
March 24, 1986. The Council considered reports and recommenda-
tions from the Planning Commission and City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis that:
1. Page A -2 of the Plan states that it will be the City's policy
to update the conversion table as new census figures are avail-
able.
2. 1980 Census figures are available and show a significant decline
in the birthrate.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker
4. Park Acquisition Charge for Neighborhood Parks
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the Meeting of April
14, 1986
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
5. Code Amendment - Parking (lst Reading)
a. Manager Lais presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Bastian moved first reading of an ordinance for an amendment
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson, Bastian and Wasiluk
Nay - Councilmember Juker
6. H.R.A. Reappointment
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to
sioner of the H.R.A. for a five -ve
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - All.
7. Bus Shelter - Beebe Road
a. The question of a bus shelter to be located on Beebe Road near the
senior citizens' building was directed to Staff for further information.
8. Metro East Study Funds
a.. Item deleted from Agenda.
Lorraine Fischer as a Commis-
9 -3/24
J . VISITOR PRESENTATION
None.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Beam and White Bear Avenues
a. Councilmember Juker questioned how many accidents had occurred at this
location.
b. Director of Public Safety Collins stated there had been 46 accidents since
1983.
C. Councilmember Juker requested information regarding the Burger King and
Rapid Oil exits on to White Bear Avenue and requested Staff to research the
number of accidents at these locations.
2. Highway 36 and English
a. Councilmember Anderson questioned why the red light on English at Highway
36 is so long.
b. Staff will investigate.
3. Arts Task Force
a. Councilmember Bastian mov that the "Appointment of an Arts Task Force"
be placed on the next agenda
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation - Child Safety Week
a. Mayor Greavu moved the following proclamation:
WHEREAS, the children of Maplewood are our most precious treasures, and
the number of lost or missing children in America is of growing concern to
us all, and _
WHEREAS, a record of every child's fingerprints can be invaluable in
tracing lost or missing children, in addition to serving as a major
deterrent to would -be criminals who would perpetrate crimes upon our
young people, and
WHEREAS, the safest, most appropriate place for such fingerprint
records to rest is with the parents themselves, and
WHEREAS, the Maplewood Mall Shopping Center during the period of
April 7 -13, 1986, has volunteered to take such fingerprints as its
contribution to the child safety movement.
10 - 3/24
THEREFORE, Z, John Greavu, Mayor of Maplewood, do hereby proclaim
Monday, April 7, to Sunday, April 13, 1986, to be Child Safety Week
in the City of Maplewood and urge the entire community to join forces
in a total effort to safeguard our children and to organize a positive
educational effort to teach our children the basic rules of safety.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
M. ADJOURNMENT
10:10 P.M.
City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
Action b Cou0
TO: City Manager Endorsed.......
FROM: Finance Director 4q2e_ odif ied-....
RE: Rej ecteDisposalofOldFinancialRecords d.....
DATE: March 31, 1986
Authorization is requested to make application to the State for disposalofoldfinancialrecords,
BACKGROUND
For the past several years, the City has been microfilmin its financialrecords, The may reason for microfilmin has been to conserve valuableceintheCityHall -- microfilmin results in a 96% reduction in the
spa
number of file cabinets and space re for records stora Oncerecordsaremicrofilmed, the ori copies are packed and sent to thePublicWorksBuildinforstora (The State Auditor re that theoricopiesbekeptforsix . years.) The mi ! cro copies are keptintheCityHallvault,
A few years a when the records i.n the City Hall • vault were reorganized,some ver old financial records were discovered. A few oft -recordsgobackto1947. All of these old records were packed and sent toPublicWorksBuildinforstoraDuetotheaoftheserecords 3, thenolonareofanuse -and have not been microfilmed However oftheinformationcontainedwithintheserecordshasbeensummarizedintheCitannualfinancialreportswhicharekeptonfilepermanentlThereforeqtheseoldrecordsshouldbedestroHowevergbeforetherecordscanbedestrotheCityisreblawtosubmittheattachedresolutionandapplicationforapprovaltotheState.
RECOMMENDATION
The attached resolution is recommended for adoption.
DFF: I nb
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, M, S . A .138.17 governs the destruction o •fWHEREAS c tY records •a 1i - st of record and
request in ds has been res ented to the cwritingthatdestruct" p
counc •n be approved b the
1 w1 th aYhe _council;NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCILMINNESOTA;
OF MAPLEWOOD
1• That the FinanceHance Director is hereMinnesotaState by directed to apply to thdestructionstoryca1Societ etructionoftheryforanordera •records as describ uthor'Z1n g
2 '
ed ?n the attached lThatuponaapprovalbtheFinancbState.of theceDirectorishere attached applicatdestroytherebyauthorizedand 'cords listed, directed to
n
PR.1 tRev. 73)
Application No.
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Date iReceved_
t 1500 MiS'S is s ippi Ste , St. Paul MN 55101
APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO DISPOSE OF ER CORDS
INSTRUCTIONS Make original and thr copies. Complete items 2.3, 4. 5, 6 and 9a b C. Use revers id fs • o form to continue records description. It more spatsisneeded, use while bond Paper similarity spaced. Send original and two copies to the above address. Retain one copy while Your application is being processedYouwillreceiveonapprovedcopyofyourapplication, which will be your authority to dispose of records. The approved copy should be retained ermanP ently.
NOTE: Laves of 1971. Chapter 529, - Section 3 reads as follows is the policy of the legislature that the disposal and eservat ion ofexclusrvelybyMinnesotaStatutes, Chapter 138 and by this act, thus, no prior. specie! or
public records be controlled
general statute shall be construed to authorize or prevent the disposal ofpublicrecordsatatimeorinamannerdifferentthanprescribedbysuchchapterorbythisactandnoneralorialstatutebeconstruedtoauthorizeorpreventthedisposal
unless t expressly
ensctd subsequent to this act shat!posal of public records at a time or in a manner different than prescribed in chapter 138 or in this act iexemptssuchrecordsfromtheprovisionsofsuchchapterandthisactbyspecificsreferencetothis P Ysection
I. TO: Minnesota Historical Society
2. FROM:
Agency or Off ice ubd ivis ion or Sect ion
3. Quantity of Records; cubic feet 19.38or linear feet
4. Location of Records:Maol_ewood PLbl , c Works B ui 1 rl, no
5. Laws other than M.S. 138.17 that relate to the destruction or safekeeping ofPg
the records : _ None to our knowledge
6 . 1 certify that the records listed on this application are accurately described,
and that they have no further administrative, legal, or fiscal value for this
agency
Authorized nanature
DANIEL F. FAUST - FINANCE DIRECTOR
am'e and - Title - I v ease or nt nr tvna
3/28/86
ate - "—
7. AUTHORIZATION
Under the authority of Minnesota Statutes
138.17, it is hereby ordered that the records
listed on this application be .destroyed,
except as shown belo w (item 8).
Director, Minnesota Historical Society
Legislative or State Auditor
Attorney General
Data
Date
D
B. Exceptions to Destruction tfor use by Direct iDirector, Legislative Auditor, State Auditor, and Attorney General only.
9. Description of Records • Describe each record series or type of record separately. Number a -- ••Y each series, begnning with 1 .
a. Item No
1.
b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement, original, duplicate, or microfilmed
FINANCIAL RECORDS
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original2656 -4835 & 1215 - 2048
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original1619 -2290 & 101 -1461 & 2342 -2682
g
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
01 -2372683 -2980 & 1494 -2525 & 6001 -6334
g
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original0238 - 150& 6802 -7599 & 1501 -1655
g
C. Inclusive Dates
1947 thru 1956
1957 thru 1959
1959 thru 1960
1960 thru 1961
Y
Serie b. Name of record, form numbers content usage, arrangement,FNo. original, duplicate, or microfilmed . c Inclusive Dates
G
1. CON'T • FINANCIAL RECORD S
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original1656- _2989 & 7600 -8416
1963
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents original2990 -4782
1965
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original8417 -9000 & 101 -435 & 4783-6382
1969
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original6383 -6563 & 436 -1446 & 6564 -7987
1962
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents
7988 -Original8539 & 1447 -2058 & 1 -569 & 8540 -9290ExpenditureVouchers & Documents Original9291 -9688 & 1 -1618 & 1619 -2763 & 138 -600
1965 thru
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original601 -8869
1967 thru
Cancelled Checks
Original2178 -2290 & _101 -2525 & 1-2100 & 2990 -3773CancelledPayrollChecks Original1618 -2980 & 6001 -7599
Cancelled Checks Original3734 -9448
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original7600 -9000 & 101-1446
Cancelled Checks Original9449 -9688 & 1 -2763 & 138-1675
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original1447 -2058 & 1-185'9
Cancelled Checks Original1676 -15163
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original1860 -6325
Sub- Ledger Reports Original
1961 thru 1962
1962
1963
1963 thru 1964
1964 thru 1965
1965 thru 1966
1966 thru 1969
1957 thru 1962
1957 thru 1962
1962 thru 1965
1962 thru 1965
1965 thru 1967
1965 thru 1967
1967 thru 1971
1967 thru 1970
1959 thru 1969
r
PR•1 (Rev. 73)
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
1500 Miss is s ippi S t e , .St. Paul MN 55101
APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO DISPOSE OF RECORDS
Application No.
Date Received
INSTRIUCTIONS: Make -original and three copies. Complete items Z, 3, 4, 5.6 and 9a, b c. Use reverse side of form to continue records description. If more spaceisneeded, use white bond paper simiiarily spaced. Send original and two copies to the above address. Retain one copy while your application is being processed.You will receive an approved copy of your application, which wilt be your authority to dispose of records. The approved copy should be retained permanently.
NOTE: Lava of 1971, Chapter 529.-Section 3 reads as follows: "it is the policy of the legislature that the disposal and preservation of public records be controlledexclusivelybyMinnesotaStatutes, Chapter 138 and by this act, thus, no prior, special or general statute shall be construed to authori:e.or prevent the disposal ofpublicrecordsatatirneorinamannerdifferentthanprescribedbysuchchapterorbythisactandnogeneralorspecialstatuteenactedsubsequenttothisactshallbeconstruedtoauthorizeorpreventthedisposalofpublicrecordsatatimeorinamannerdifferentthanprescribedinchapter138orinthisactunless ' xexemptssuchrecordsfromtheprovisionsofsuchchaterandthisactbs t expresslypyspecificreferencetothissection."
1. TO: Minnesota Historical Society
2 F ROM: •FinanrP PnartmPnt _Agency or Off ice S ubdivisiono Section
3. Quantity of Records; cubic feet 19.38or linear feet
4. Location of Records: •
5. Laws Other :than M.S. 138.17 that relate to the destruction or safekeeping of
the records: None to our knowledge
6. 1 certify that the records listed on this application are accurately described,
and that they have no further administrative, legal, or fiscal value for this
agency
3/28/86
ut ori=e nanature -- ate -- "' —
DANIEL F. FAUST - FINANCE DIRECTOR
ame and ease print or type
7. AUTHORIZATION
Under the authority of Minnesota Statutes
138.17, it is hereby ordered that the records
listed on this application be destroyed,
except as shown below (item 8).
W1W WUsvr, m591"RMvia MaTorlcal ,ocle'ty
Legislative or State Auditor
Attorney Genera
Date.
Date
Date
8. Exceptions to Destruction. (for use by Director, Legislative Auditor, State Auditor, and Attorney General only.)
9. Description of Records . Describe each record series or type of record separately. Number each series, beginning with "l
a. Item No F b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement, original, duplicate, or microfilmed
1.FINANCIAL RECORDS
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
2656 -4835 & 1215 - 2048
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
1619 - 2290 & 101 - 1461 & 2342 - 2682
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
2683 -2980 & 1494 -2525 & 6001 -6334 & 01 -237
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
238 -1500 & 6802 -7599 & 1501 -1655
C. Inclusive Oates
1947 thru 1956
1957 thru 1959
1959 thru 1960
1960 thru 1961
b. Name of record, form numbers, content, usage, arrangement,
original, duplicate, or microfilmed.
COWTJ FINANCIAL RECORDS
Expenditure Vouchers ,& Documents Original
1656-2989A 7600 -8416
Expenditure Vouchers '& Documents Original
2990 -4782
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
8417 -9000 & 101 -435 & 4783 -6382
E A V h R. D t 0 1xpenuireoucersocumens
6383 -6563 & 436 -1446 & 6564 -7987
rigi11C
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
7988 -8539 & 1447- 2058 &J-569 & 8540 -9290
1964
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
9291 -9688 & 1 -1618 & 1619 -2763 & 138 -600
1965
Expenditure Vouchers & Documents Original
601 -8869
thru
Cancelled Checks Original
2178 -2290 & 101 -2525 & 1 -2100 & 2990 -3773
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original
1618 -2980 & 6001 -7599
Cancelled Checks Original
3734 -9448
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original
7600 -9000 & 101 -1446
Cancelled Checks Original
9449 -9688 & 1 -2763 & 138 -1675
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original
1447- 2058 & 1 -1859
Cancelled Checks Original
1676 -15163
Cancelled Payroll Checks Original
1860 -6325
Sub-Ledger Reports Original
c. Inclusive Dates
1961 thru 1962
1962
1963
thru 1965
i 1963 thru 1964
1964L thru 1965
1965 thru 1966
1966 thru 1969
1957 thru 1962
1957 thru 1962
1962 thru 1965
1962 thru 1965
1965 thru 1967
1965 thru 1967
1967 thru 1971
1967 thru 1970
1959 thru 1969
M.ATTpw J. LEVIT'f DAVID J. SPENCER
COLA O .EHLER DANIEL J. COLE, JR.
4 RoHERT M. BOWEN DOU L. SHoR
FEANK HAMMOND MICHAEL H. JERONIMUS
LxON J,. KEYES R. SCOTT DAVIES
ROBERT G. SHARE J. PATRICK McDAVITT
BuBT E: SWANSON JOHN B . VAN DE NORTII, JR.
K, J. GALVIN, JR.RIcHAIR G. MARK
DAVID C. FOBSBERo ANDREW C. BECHER
JOHN J . MCNEELY JAMES E. NELSON
MCNEIL V.. SEYMOUR, JR.JEROME A. GEIS
JSBRY F. ROTMAN STEVE A. BRAND
TEBENCE N. DOYLE JOEL H. GoTTESMAN
RICHARD H. KYLE ALAN H. MACLIN
JOHN L. DEVNEY JEFFREY F. SHAW
RONALD L. SORENSON MATTHEW L. LEVIrr
PETER H. SEED DAVID G. GREENING
SAMUEL L. HANSON DAVID B. SAND
RONALD E. ORcHARV DANIEL M. COUGHLAN
JOHN TROYER JOSEPH P. NOACH
STEPHEN WINNncK CHARLES R. HAYNoR
AVRON L. GOBDON ANDREA M. BOND
JOHN R. KENEFICK TIMOTHY P. FLAHERTY
THOMAS A LARS MARTIN H. FISH
LAW OFFICES
BRIGGS AND MO RGAN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (612) 291 -1215
TELECOPIER (612) 222-4071
INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF
LEVTTT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE
Ms. Kathleen A. Drannen
Assistant Vice President
First Bank Minneapolis
First Bank Place
Post Office Box A512
Minneapolis MN 55480
ROBERT J. PRATTE Amw HUNTRODS
JOSH BULTENA TRUDY R. GAsTEA20EO
JAMES G. RAY ELrzAB J. ANDREWS
RICHARD H. MARTIN GREGORY J. STENMOE
TRUDY J. HAI.I.A CiuRLEs B. RooERs
MARY L. IPPEL TERRY L. SLYE
JAMES A. VOSE PAUL M. GALES
ROBYN L. HANSEN MARY M. DYRSETH
ROBERT E. WOODS KEVIN A. BERG
WILLIAM J. JOANIS MARK SCHROEDER
MARGARET K. SAVAGE MARIAN M. DURKIN
BEum G. BELIsLE NANCY D. ARNI
TONY STEMHERGEB MICHAEL J. MCELLISTBF M
MART E. SCHAFmzR PAUL S. JACOBSEN
MICHAEL H. STRE;ATEB TIMOTHY J. KEENAN
Josh H. LumsTRoM
RICHARD D. ANDEBsoN
SALLY A. Sc000ix
DAVID C . MCDONALD OF COUNSEL
BRUCE W MoOTY J. NEIL MORTON
ERIc NILSSON RICHARD E. KYLE
ANDREW R. Kn- rzzNoER JOHN M. PALMER
FREDERICK P. ANGST SAMUEL H. MOBGAN
ROBERT L. LEE FRAN N. GRAHAM
A. LAURENCE DAVIS
CLSRENCE G. FRAME
JOHN M. SULLIVAN
April 4, 1986 Act -ton by Counc ..l
ndorsed
odi3e
ected
Mr. Donald , Lai s
ej
Lais Banni &
Mr. Jerome P. Gilligan
Dorsey & Whitney
2.200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Ran
Ciresi, P.A.
409 Midwest Federal
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Ms. Lucille Aurelius
City of Maplewood
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, MN 55109
Mr. William N. Driscoll
President
Turnpike Properties Midwest, Inc.
3433 Broadway Northeast
Suite 401
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Re: City of Maplewood, Minnesota - $3,000,000
Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982
Tanners Lake Partners Project)
Ms. Drannen, Ms. Aurelius and Gentlemen ::
Enclosed for your review in connection with the proposedamendmentoftheaboveNoteareinitialdraftsofthefollowingdocuments:
2200 FIRST NATIONAL. BANK BUILDING
2400 I D S CENTER l
SAINT PAiTL, MINNESOTA 515101
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 584029121291 -1216 (
912) 339 -0681
MATTHEW J. LEVITT DAVID J. SPENCERCOLEOEHLERDANIELJ. COLE, JR.ROBERT M. BOWEN DOUGLAS L. SHOFiRNHHAMMMICHAELH. JERONIMUSLEONARDJ. KEYES R. SCOTT DAVIESROBERTG. SHARE
BURT E- SWANSON J. PATRICK MCDAVITT
JOHN B. VAN DE NORTIi, J8.M. J. GALVIN, JR.RICHARD G. MARKDAVIDC. FORSBERO ANDREW C. BECHERJOHNJ. MCNEELY JAMES E. NELSON.MCNEIL .V. SEYMOUR, JR.JEROME A. GEIsJERRYF.. ROTMAN STEVE A. BRANDTERENN. DOYLE JOEL H. GorrEsMANRICHARDH. KYLE Ai.AN H. MAcLINJoHN. L. DEvxEY JEFFREY F. SHAWRONALDL. SORENSON
PETER H. SEED MATTHEW L. UmTT
SAMUEL L. HANSON DAVID G. GREENING
DAVID B. SANDRONALDE. ORCHARD DANIEL M. COUGHLAxJOHNTaoYER
STEPHEN WINNICS JOSEPH P NOACH
CHARLES R. HAYNORAvxoNL. GORDON
JOHN R. KENEFICH ANDREA M. BOND
TIMOTHY P FLAHERTYTHOMASA. LAasoN MARTIN H. FISH
LAW OFFICES ROBERT J, pRATTE
B IR T1 S AND M ORGAN
JOHN BULTEN
JAMES G. RAY
ANN
Y R. GA T
ELIZA
R. Gn.ELIZIiHETH
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
RICA $.
TRUD J. HALL
J. ANDREWSANDREWS
CHARLEY J E
MARY L. IPPEL
AMES A. VOSE
CHARLES B. RO('E8SRomeRs
TE88Y L. SLYE
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANH
ROBYN L. Hexs
WILD
PAUL M. GALES
MARY M.
KEVIN RBUILDINGJJS
A BA. BERG
MASH SCHROEDE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 33101 BRIAN G. BEI.ISLE
K. SAVAGE
BRIAN MARIAN M. DUaHIx
TONY Sz'EMi3
MARY E. ScasF1xEB
NANCY D. AaNZSOx
MICHAEL J. MCELLISTBEM
TELEPHONE (612) 291 -1213 JOHNH LHINDS8
PAUL S. JACOBSEx
TIMOTHY J. KEENAN
TAI- ECOPIER (612) 222-40771 RICHARD D. ANDERSON
SALLY A. SCOGGIN
DAVID C. M
BRUCE W. MOOrr OF COUNSEL
INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF ERIC NILSSON
ANDREW R Kzx
J NEIL MOaTOSTJ- N ED E. KYLE
LEVITY, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & S HA RE FREDERICK
E
MOST
a
AxasT
ROBERT L. LEE
J M. PALMER
SAMUELSAMUEL H MORGAN
N. GRAHAM
A. LAURENCE DAvis
CLSRExcE G. FRAM
JOHN M. SULUVAN
April 4,1986
Ms, Kathleen A. Drannen
Assistant Vice President
First Bank Minneapolis
Bank PlaceFirstBa
p
Post Office Box A512
Minneapolis, MN 55480
Mr, Jerome P. Gilligan
Dorsey & Whitney
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Mr. William N. Driscoll
President
Turnpike Properties Midwest Inc.3433 Broadway Northeast
Suite 401
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Mr. Donald Lais
Lais, Bannigan &
Ciresi, P.A.
409 Midwest Federal
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Ms. Lucille Aurelius
City of Maplewood
1380 Frost Avenue
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: City of Maplewood, Minnesotasofa $3,000CommercialDevelopmentRevenueNoteof19TannersLakePartnersProject)
82
Ms. Drannen, Ms. Aurelius and Gentlemen ::
Enclosed for your review in connection with the proposedamendmentoftheaboveNoteareinitialdraftsofthef •documents: following
2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANg BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 2400 I D S CENTER
612) 291 -1215 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
612) 339 -0661
BRIGGS AND. MORGAN
Page Two
April 4, 1986
1. Resolution to be considered by the City of
Maplewood at its April 14, 1986 meeting containing,
as Exhibit A, the proposed form of amendment to the
Note;
2. IRS Election Statement
3. Amendment to Loan Agreement;
4. Certificate of Partners of Tanners Lake Partners
after Tax Issues; and
5. Form of Restatement of Guaranty
6. Release of Guaranty of Newel P. Weed, Jr.
7. Guaranty of Edward Chute
By separate letter I have sent ten copies of the enclosed
resolution to Ms. Lucille Aurelius, the City Clerk for
the City of Maplewood, so that the proposed form of the
resolution can be distributed with the agenda for the April
14, 1986 meeting. Since none of you has had a chance yet
to review any of the documents, much less the City's resolution,
prior to this distribution, I have advised Ms. Aurelius
that the documents are subject to some change but that
modifications to the resolution itself should be minor.
I would appreciate it if each of you would review
the enclosed documents and give me your comments as soon
as possible next week. You should pay special attention
to the following points, which reflect questions that, occurred
to me while preparing these documents:
a) I have provided for the payment of additional
interest annually on September 1. Although primary
interest on the Note is paid monthly, additional interest
is based on cash flow information which, I assume,
will not as readily, available on a monthly basis.
BRIGGS .&wn MORG.A.N
Page Three
april 4, 1986
b) The Amendment to the Note provides for the
payment of additional interest pursuant to a formula
and mechansim that should be reviewed carefully by
all parties. In addition, the parties should note
that the original note did not provide for any change
in the interest rate for the period following September
1, 1992. Therefore, under this amendment, the interest
rate will continue at 11.65% from that date for the
balance of the term of the Note.
c) The Amendment to Loan Agreement is intended
to contain two main points, the addition of the arbitrage
rebate provisions and the inclusion of reporting requirements
relating to net cash flow. As you can see, the second
of these new provisions has not been completed at
this time, but is intended to conform to the information
contained in the cash flow projections used by the
Bank. In light of the broad reporting requirements
already in the Loan Agreement, should consider
whether this proposed amendment is even necessary
should be reviewed carefully by both the Company and
the Bank.
d) I have made no specific amendment to the
Construction Loan Agreement since I assume that, for
the most part, its terms have been complied with.
e) It is my intention, in light of the amendment
format, to make the original note available so that
the signature page can be marked to show that the
note has been amended.
f) I have used the form of guaranty originally
executed by Newel P. Weed Jr. in preparing Edward
Chute's guaranty. Therefore, Mr. Chute's obligation
under that guaranty is limited to the same extent
that Newel Weed's original obligation was limited.
The Bank's instructions did not specifically direct
this result, and the guaranty shouldm therefore, be
reviewed carefully by the Bank.
W
BRIGGS -&wiD M
Pa Four
april 4, 1986
Please.note that some of the points that were included
in the bank term sheet that I have received are not included
in an of these amendments. An example is the sale of
the 49% of Turnpike Properties Midwest to its shareholders
which the existin do not prohibit.-
A please call when you have reviewed the enclosed
documents. I would like to have relativel final documents
to the Cit no later than Frida April 11,
Ver trul yours,
Rob Hansen
RH:j ' I.
Encl:osures
RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
WHEREAS,
a) On August 23, 1982,_ the City of Maplewood (the
City ") issued its $3,000,000 Commercial Development Revenue
Note of 1982 (Tanners Lake Partners Project) (the "Note")
pursuant to the terms of a Final Note Resolution adopted
by the City on August 9, 1982 (the "Note Resolution ");
and
b) The Note was purchased by First National Bank
of Minneapolis (the "Lender ") and is still held by the
Lender; and
c) In connection with the issuance of the Note the
City and Tanners Lake Partners,, a Minnesota general
partnership (the "Borrower ") entered into a loan agreement
dated August 23, 1982 (the "Loan Agreement ") pursuant to
which the City loaned to the Borrower the proceeds received
by the City from the sale of the Note to finance the
acquisition of land and construction thereon of a 115 room
motel (the "Project ") and required that the Borrower ap Y
directly to the Lender sums sufficient to repay the Note
according to its terms; and
d) The interest of the City in the Loan Agreement
has been assigned to the Lender pursuant to a pledge
agreement also dated August 23, 1982; and
e) The Borrower and Lender have negotiated a
modif iciation of the Note which, in the opinion of BriggsandMorgan, Professional Association, bond counsel to the
City, requires the participation of the City in order to
ensure that the interest on the Note does not, by virtue
of its amendment, become subject to federal income taxation;
and
f) The Borrower and Lender have requested that the
City consent to the amendment of the Note to:
1. Allow the Borrower to immediately prepay
up to $500,000 of the Note without penalty.
2. Reduce the primary interest rate on
the Note from 14% to 11.65% with payments of
interest only to be due from May 1, 1986 until
September 1, 1992,
3. Provide for additional interest to be
paid on the Note at the rate of 4% per annum
for the period from May 1, 1986 until September
1, 1992 provided_ that such additional interest
shall be payable only from (i) 50% of the net
cash f low of the Project after debt service and
on the Note and on a $135,000 loan to the Project
from Days Inn Corporation. The additional interest
will accumulate, without interest thereon, until
September 1, 19920 If the Lender has not received
4% per annum additional interest on the Note
by September 1, 1992, the Lender will be entitled
to receive the balance of such additional interest
in a lump sum payment from any proceeds received
from the sale or refinancing of the Project in
excess of $600,0000
4. The Lender will release the personal
guaranty executed by Newell P. weed, Jr. and
will add a personal guarantee from Edward Chute_;
and
g) The Borrower has represented to the City that
the representations on which the City relied in adopting
the Note Resolution and in entering into the Loan Agreement
remain true and correct as of the date hereof, and that
no Event of Default has occurred under the Loan Agreement
or Note and no event has occurred which, with the giving
of notice or passage of time, or both, would constitute
such an Event of Default,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota as follows:
1. The findings and representations contained in
the Note Resolution adopted by the City on August 9, 1982,
authorizing the Note, are hereby ratified, reaffirmed and
remain in full force and effect with respect to the Note,
provided that all references to the Note in the Note
Resolution shall, from and after May 1, 1986, be deemed
to refer to the Note as amended by this resolution.
2. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City are hereby
authorized to execute an amendment to the Note in
substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, with
2
I
such modifications or omissions as may be approved by the
city attorney for the City of Maplewood, and any other
documents (including an Amendment to the Loan Agreement,
an Amendment the Pledge Agreement, an IRS Election Statement
and a Form 8038, which in the reasonable opinion of Briggs
and Morgan, Professional Association, as bond counsel are
necessary to allow bond counsel to render its opinion that
the amended Note continues to bear interest which is exempt
from federal income taxation.
Adopted April 14, 19860
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3
AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT to Loan Agreement made and executed
as of the lst day of May, 1986, by and between the City
of Maplewood, a political subdivision in the State of Minne-
sota (the "City ") and Tanners Lake Partners, a Minnesota
general partnership (the "Borrower ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the City and Borrower have previously entered
into a Loan Agreement dated August 23, 1982 (the "Loan
Agreement ") pursuant to which the City loaned to the Borrower
the proceeds received by the City from the sale of the
3,000,000 Commercial Development Revenue Note of 1982
Tanners Lake Partners Project) .issued on August 23, 1982
the "Note "); and
WHEREAS the Note was initially purchased, and is still
held by First National Bank of Minneapolis (the "Lender ");
and
WHEREAS the Borrower and Lender have negotiated, and
the City has by resolution of its City Council adopted
April 14, 1986 approved, a modification of the Note which,
in the opinion of -.Briggs and Morgan, Professional Associa-
tion, bond counsel to the City of Maplewood, constitutes
a "new issuance" under Section 103 of the Internal. Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code ");
and
WHEREAS the City and Borrower have been advised that
in order for bond counsel to give an opinion that interest
on the Note, as amended, will continue to be exempt from
federal income taxation the Loan Agreement must be amended
to add certain new requirements that may become effective
with respect to the amended Note if H.R. 3838, currently
pending before Congress, is adopted with its now existing
effective dates; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to
enter into this Amendment to Loan Agreement to incorporate
into the Loan Agreement the changes that will be required
to maintain the tax exempt status of the Note under the
circumstances outlined herein, as well as certain changes
required by the Lender.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed by and between
the parties hereto as follows:
1. Article 1 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended
by amending certain of the definitions contained therein
to read as follows:
Guarantors Northco, Ltd., Turnpike Properties
Midwest, Inc.,, Dr. Arvid Johnson, Detlef Stroh, James
W. Beck, William M. Bracken, Bruce M. Carlson, John
D. Maney, Fred H. Chute, Timothy Adams, William M.
Driscoll, Edward Chute and William B. Cash.
Note: the $3,000,000 Commercial Development
Revenue Note of 1982 (Tanners Lake Partners Project)
issued by the City on August 23, 1982, as amended
by an amendment dated May 1, 19860
2, Article 4, Section 4.01 of the Loan Agreement
is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph:
In order to enable the Lender to calculate the
amount of additional interest due on the Note, the
Borrower shall, in addition to any other reports requir-
ed by the preceding paragraph, provide the Lender
with:
TO BE PROVIDED]
3. Article 4, Section 4.07 of the Loan Agreement
is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph.:
In order to assure that the interest on the
Note shall at all times be free from federal income-
taxation Borrower will, on. behalf of the City, pay
to the United States, as a rebate, an amount equal
to the sum of (a) the excess of (i) the aggregate
amount earned on all nonpurpose obligations (other
than investments attributable to an excess described
in this clause), over (ii) the amount which would
have been earned if all nonpurpose obligations were
invested at a rate equal to the yield on the Note,
plus (b) any income attributable to the excess described
in clause (a), at the times and in the amounts required
by Section 103(c)(6)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code,
all within the meaning of Section 103(c)(6) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Borrower or Lender shall main-
tain records of the interest rate borne by the Note
and the investment of the Construction Fund and earnings
thereon, in adequate detail to enable Borrower to
calculate the amount of any rebate required to be
made to the United States provided that the requirements
K
11
n
94
h
of this paragraph shall only be effective if H. R.
3838, currently pending before Congress, is adopted
and requires that the Note be subject to Section
103(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.
4. Except as modified herein, all the terms and
conditions of the Loan Agreement dated August 23, 1982,
and the representations contained in that Loan Agreement,
shall remain in full f orce and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their
hands on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Clerk
TANNERS LAKE PARTNERS
By Turnpike Properties
Midwest, Inc.
By-
Its
By Northco, Ltd.
a general partner
By
By
t3
D
w
TANNERS LAKE PARTNERS
By
Dr. Arvid Johnsen
By
Detlef Stroh
Amendment to Loan Agreement dated March 1, 1986, by and
between the City of Maplewood and Tanners Lake Partners
f
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Associate Planner -- Johnson
Final Plat
Ed Cave and S Inc.
Cave's English Street Addition
April 2, 1986
SUMMARY
Aution '- Council*
orsed.....
odif xed.,.-
ejecte
Dat -
Request
Approval of the Cave's English Street final plat for 23- singledwellinglots.
All of the final plat and platting - related lanned unitt developmentconditionshavebeensatisfied.
Recommendation
Approve Cave's English Street Addition final lap t.
BACKGROUND
Past Action
12 -9 -85:
Council approved:
1 • A conditional use 'permit for Cave's English Street Addiplannedunitdevelopment, tion.
2• Street and alley vacations and Caves English Streetpreliminaryplat, sub to.J .
a. Council approval of th •
same name,
a Planned unit development by the
b. Submission of final radi '
en
g ng drainage and utility planstothecityengineer, These plans shall be accom 'storm water ponding design calcula panted by.
allow for one f Lions. The easement shallfootofelevationabovethe100_ •elevation, year ponding
c. If the ponding easement must be 'the lots abutting increased in area, all ofgitshallhaveatleast7500-square farea, outside of the easement.
q eet of .
d. Submission of a signedgd developers agreement with therequiredsurety, to the cit engineerY • g neer for all required publicstreet, ponding and utility Im roYp vements.
e. Submission of a recordable u i t--c '
prior to
q lalm deed to, the cityengineerPrequestingfinalplatapprovaltPPoconvey a30-foot wide storm sewer easement to the c i ty, centered on thewestlineof .proposed Lot On 'One of Caves Cope Avenue AdditionbetweenCopeAvenueandthenorthlineofthissplat. I f thiseasementisshownontheCave's Cope A •P venue Addition and thefinalplatisrecordedbeforefinalplatapprovalisforthisquit-claimforproposal, a q m deed well not be necessary,Y
f. Revise the ro osed '
Thirt
P P utility easement over Lots Twelve,een and Twenty -three to a 30-footontheof wide easement,
line between the tie -in
ement, centeredProposedwatermain. The water main - sconstructedonastraight hall,be
iStreetanditsconnectionwiththe English
Circle. e Proposed main in
n En gu
McAfee
g• Submission of signed agreements withIth Northern StatesPowerandBellTelephoneonepriorto _final plat approval.
h. Recording the underlyingef . nderlying street and alley acatioorethefinalplatisrecorded.,
Y ns
2
Jc
Attachments
1. Location Map
20 Preliminary Plat (.8 1/2 x 11)
3. Preliminary Plat (separate enclosure
3
R rF. !
N R •
PUD
a 0
R
R . F MI F Q
EDGEHILE '
R F w M I
F (R2) DEMONT
j 4 M I R h C
R. a R ` I 9C F J
M I R 3 SEXTAN EAVE
R R w R LflC F
M I M I > ..:_._.. v 1
F`
M I
MI a • GRA Ay •
I R MI R
TR •
WAY
36
f C'
I R
R
Q • —•r R-3C ' • BCC
R
R = • —•
R OUNTY
4
v C
R 2 RD •ff..
R
LELAND '+
ST A C • I R
R ov ( 2)
o
fREF
wAVE R
euwcE R3 AVEAv MFR F •' .
1 I`
44
4
R' B C , R
00 ycL M I % F ; V
P
t wE 1 • F
o F ; E W 0 -_
RYAN
R 2 -.;'' ~ R j
2 - Rr S ROSEWOOD
N
C .. LBC
8C • RF
o
F 9 C BEN 4n L. 8 C '.,C l AVE. •
a I e._.._ . F .
c d . R
Q z a°r R L R 3 `'R
a ° 3 , S81E R v
R F s P ` R
o
W R F -
oRJR3 R EY
Y W AVEQR ,.
z
R
C
r \ SOP A AVE v a W
0 Y 3 A
aKE;PHALCIV Q = R R _
F - W R R
9 . , LAKE F ` •., R
2) + AvE o BC
w
All
R N
R R
NC -f
a TY OF ST. PAa v z %
LOCATION MAP
4
Attachment 1
l
N
jc PE - AVENUE p
I CA:'Ea
1 i . ice` , • i '` -°
I _ 1
o
U /
lip
r, .e x »e zoo
riP.
i 1 ` •, r
1
10L . Z
40
14 . v
1 . `
lzk
Ir
o '
1 . J6 r
Ar
Is t
r
w
qn
CAVES ENGLISH STREET ADDITION
PRELIMINARY PLAT
5 Attachment
i4N
E -5
Aotion b Courlall:
MEMORANDUM
Endorsed.......
Modif ied-,.,,-..
Rej ected...TO* --------City Mana DateFROM: City Clerk
RE: Bud Transfer/Lanier.Transcriber
DATE: April 9, 1986
It is. requested to approve a bud transfer from the ContinAccount -in the amount of $750-.00 to -purchase a Lanier TranscriberDictating /recordin . device . At the present time a small tape re .Pi-.corder is bein used for Council Meetin bu it is not producingoodcopyandisnotatranscriber,
MEMORANDUM
Action b Cl
TO: City Managerer odifi d.
FROM: City Engineer ej ecte
SUBJECT: R o s e v i l l e Water Service Date
DATE: April 7, 1986
The owners of a proposed auto service center on Rice Street are requesting
water service from Roseville. Maplewood will not be a b l e to provide service to
this location due to the high elevation.
It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution requesting
R o s e v i l l e allow the proposed auto service center to connect to their water
system.
Mr. Ken Haider
Public Works Department
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road "B"
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
RE: PROPOSED AUTO SERVICE CENTER
Dear Haider:
Enclosed, please find a copy of part of a surve indicates hYgthe locationoftheabovementioneddevelopment.
The owners of this development request approval from the City f M
of Roseville's - Y aplewoodtotheCitywaterline,.Iocated on the West side of RiceStreet,
Mr. Doug Strong, with the City of Roseville, has indicated to us that the.City would allow us to tie into their water line. However, the City cannotgrantformalapprovaluntiltheCityofMaplewoodrantsit's approval,g
Will you please start the gears in motion to et h'g this proposal before theCouncilforapproval.
If you have any questions or need additional information pleasee call.
Sincerely,
CONS UC N 0, INC.
Brent Krause
Project Manager
BK:baj
V 2'1
CONSTRUCTION 70 INCORPORATED / 1430 WEST COUNTY ROAD C / SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA 55113
TELEPHONE (612) 636 -4390
Y. v `v v v lam,y 121 E
i 1 T • • . , • 1p •
1 • .. i/ t.•. r . 1
U E R--w OR
A .•'. .• h. ,.` • • .. • - yam•
L . • • >.•1, • 61 . • • ,• L.' • r ••+, _ : tjam... • . i • I y rr t :aims • •..I TY F MAPOOD*
low o 4he. N W 14
COUNTY _ ,r- • ROAD
s - 4t • .., f*iry t * %c - Coos
So Sfo{ ior+
8 14. COG
34.0
r J 3 44. S&
LLJ
cn
24 s
Cub F
2 3.S.a
PARCEL
40 3(o.op -.1 ol. Jp
Jill 0
1- ••• • .. ' s G. "- •. .•• , • _. 111 { { {ll "! ..i • •
1!4•.0 1 t
V I i{I I l I{1 m
qSPc•o f oQdt. tots 10 { ! a t 'cQ
Umes t 1161{ A
1 233•o r
sqo
oi Sq 9 4-
1111 - .i 1111
11 11 • . • • . •. • _ . • _ 5ovt h tine. Orcc c i 8
c,;•
t
E 1 DQt,otQs C usi orn e
AP
Ovor 11" .•
f —.•
s -
5.0 N , ''' E•2 oenoias cosiom(
J C Acc E m9. Schroeder M o K
Co No Wca
el
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Construction 70 desires to build on Rice Street adjacent to theFoodssite;e Cub
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood cannot rovide water service to h •P t site,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood, Minnesota City CPy ounce 1
that the City of Roseville is requested to provide water service to the
auto service center proposed by Construction 70.
MEMORANDUM
t
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: Water Service From Little Canada
DATE: April 7, 1986
Lr - - -
Aot n by Council:
ndorsed.
Modified..,
Rejecte
Date
The Hilltop Shopping Center is proposed for construction east of the Cub Foodsssite. Maplewood cannot serve this location with city water.
It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution requestingqgLittleCanadaprovidingwaterservicetotheproposedHilltopShoppingCenter,P PP g e .
1
v
pink andpaul associates, Inc.
February 14, 1986 architecture planning . interior design
Mr. Ken Haider
City of Maplewood -
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Hilltop Shopping. Center
Commission No. 850540
Dear Mr. Haider:
Our client, Maplewood Acres, Inc. is proposing to construct a convenience 'strip'shopping center East of Rice Street and Cub Foods County
p
on ty Road.'B' in Maplewood. Thecenterwillcontain49,200 square feet of commercial retail space, and will lease spacetoapproximately23tenants.
Currently there is no available water source to this site other than through LittleCanada. We are requesting that water service be extended from the City of Little CanadaviatheCubFoodsline. Our client is negotiating with Cub Foods and the City f LittleCanada "at this time. We understand our client w'
Y
ill be assessed fees by Little Canada.
Please extend this request to the City of Little Canada and advise us on. this matter.
If we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at 871 -5615.
Sincerely,
PAUL PINK AND AS ATES, INC.
By Dennis Kroll
Project Architect
DK /bp
cc: Dan Oren
Bob Obermeyer
John Titus
Paul Pink
425 oak grove minneapolis, minnesota 55403 (612) 871 -5615
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Maplewood Acres, Inc, desires to ' Cub Foods• build on County Road 6 east of
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood cannot rop vide water service to the site;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b thee Maplewood Minnesota City Council thattheCityofLittleCanadaisrequestedtorovidew •Shopping Center site,
p water service to the Hilltop
Apr 11 9, 1986 Acti by C ®unci _j
MEMORANDUM Endorse
To: ModifieCiManagerDRe ° eFrom. Donaldd La i s cted.,,Chief of Police Kenneth V. C I3,te
medic Gift o]ins,
The family ofMal Hedv9 ohnsonpewoodPolip has donat
mem ramedic p $ in her h 'al be used to gram, Th onor to thepurchaseequipmentasa
y have
rei ted that. theq
I would recommend memorial t Mrs. d ohnendththec • y acCe
s:on,of appreciati .q t this generousbeSenttothe
acce
fame l . g ft and a letteIy ' rwouldfurtherrecommend _ that thisaccountnumberpl--4 i s move b e Placedaced i600 -43 for fut y
n paramedicramedisIsubmitthis
u re use.,
ap
f °r your nevi e w and submission to the City Cou nci l for
KVC: js
cc Paramedic File85 -01385
e
5
a
T0:
FROM
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
BATE:
Action by Council:
Enrdorsoc,„
MEMORANDUM Mo dif i ed„...,
City Manager
Rejected.....
DAssociatePlanner -- Johnson '
PUD Revision
County Road B. west of the Railroad Tracks
Ed Cave and Sons, Inc.
Cave's English Street Addition
March 10, 1986
SUMMARY
Request
Amend the conditional use permit for Cave's English Street Additionn
planned unit development.
Proposal
Build a double dwelling, rather than a single dwelling, on Lotgg, OneBlockOneofthisdevelopment. Refer to the map on P ga e 6.
0^mmnr4- rr
The proposal is consistent with the comprehensiveP plan and zoning code
requirements. The PUD contains substantially less density than
permitted, even after this change. The site is also surrounded byPropertyplannedforRM, residential medium density use that is underthecontroloftheapplicant.
Recommendation
Approve the resolution. on page 7 to revise Cave's English StreetAdditionplannedunitdevelopmenttoallowLotOneBlockOneto be
used for a double dwelling.
BACKGROUND
Site Description
Size: 14,400 square feet with 95 feet of frontage on Count . g y Road B
Existing land use: undeveloped
Easements: The east thirty feet of the site will be subject to a
tilit easement when the '
3 •
Y Cave's English Street Addition final plat is
recorded.
Surrounding Land Uses
North: undeveloped property to be platted (Cave's'En 'English Streetet
Addition) as the deep yards of single dwelling lots and a temporaryPYstormwaterpond. The area is planned for RM, residential medium
density use.
East: railroad right -of -way. Across the right-of-,way s undevelopedYplandplannedforRMuse.
South: County Road B. Across the street is undeveloped land plannedforRMuse,
West: undeveloped property proposed as a single. dwellin g lot in
Cave's English Street Addition. This property is planned for RM use.
Past Actions
12 -9 -85:
Council approved Cave's English Street Addition planned unit
development and preliminary plat. (See the map on page .) Final
plat approval has been requested,
Planning
10 Land use plan designation: RM, residential medium density
2. Zoning: planned unit development of small -lot, single dwellinglots, overlying R -1, single dwelling zoning
3. Policy criteria from the plan:
a. Page 18 -30: The RM classification is designated for such
housing types as single dwellings on small lots,
double dwellings town houses and mobile homes.
b* Page 18-8: Residential areas should be encouraged, plannedandguidedtoprovideavarietyofhousingtypeswithin
neighborhoods.
4. Permitted density: 22 people /net acre
2
y
50 Proposed density (Cave's English Street lanned unit develop-merit)
P elop
Presently: 12.7 p /na
Proposed: 1.3.3 p /na
1. Planning Commission recommendation
2. City council decision following a public hearing
Jw
Attachments
1. Sherwood Glen Neighborhood Land Use Plan
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
30 Cave's English Street PUD and Plat
4. Resolution
3
A
lb
NNW
W 4*
ill$ so •
or 16,111 •
a all 1 6
a S 1 .,/ 111 {11 11
40 or
61 Its
v
I
SN
a Lu
winwrr
110
Hfil lowiialma-M. .-ML
4F. v I UE c
B-24-8%9
7-23—RE
arterig
WAM I I1, W AmMOP, •
1 0 9M I:
M:4 ago
11 M 1111 , as
irr •fir, :: '.
Ii 'irt rrrrr. ~
ammo
UAUE'S ENGLISH STREET a
PUD AND PLAT (Proposed `, z r '
16 17 ^
z 8)for Recording Spring 1986)t+ I3 14 9 , st ; 93 34 ,,;
r• N lr l• ri r. r r. 4Q 4
O
OF LAURIE r
y _ ..
w... _ _
R OA D
1.7
D • fir' •
7
t k
14 13 ! 7
N
ro 4 .
r _ - - <
M
r, -t : :: • : 1 ME
Are
s 14a t7 18 t9 2a z =: . '::_: is ib th to aj ( 2201y • r . 9 . •:• •: !t3 rs
T _ ~ • .; • ; .
x, Div , ( t) j14) ' 15) (11'
t
I r
ae n •• 11 .• M Mf M 2197
2200 '.'. a .
SAN DH
1. . r, `•. „ •
a Go' 4
lel
2181
1407
M 13 14 r 19 2 L{ 3 i7 f14 r9 o r 12 t I jt4
r
di
SC H
L.
IN II
r „ y Vi
y
N t
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
5
Attach 2
4
N
s
73'
4
O ° 401
5&
110
53 iq laN
03) 0z)00
W433 ,gyp• g 1
Ile
40 ow Q
J
1 IL
10
alit a 6JL
V11
3E 33 I r3 14 i _.1 -r4 to st sre
2 2 i
2?K4
LAR K AVE.
5 2 1 9 6 ? 6 S
1h
t{ 10
1
r^
T
mr
UAUE'S ENGLISH STREET a
PUD AND PLAT (Proposed `, z r '
16 17 ^
z 8)for Recording Spring 1986)t+ I3 14 9 , st ; 93 34 ,,;
r• N lr l• ri r. r r. 4Q 4
O
OF LAURIE r
y _ ..
w... _ _
R OA D
1.7
D • fir' •
7
t k
14 13 ! 7
N
ro 4 .
r _ - - <
M
r, -t : :: • : 1 ME
Are
s 14a t7 18 t9 2a z =: . '::_: is ib th to aj ( 2201y • r . 9 . •:• •: !t3 rs
T _ ~ • .; • ; .
x, Div , ( t) j14) ' 15) (11'
t
I r
ae n •• 11 .• M Mf M 2197
2200 '.'. a .
SAN DH
1. . r, `•. „ •
a Go' 4
lel
2181
1407
M 13 14 r 19 2 L{ 3 i7 f14 r9 o r 12 t I jt4
r
di
SC H
L.
IN II
r „ y Vi
y
N t
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
5
Attach 2
4
N
r
t
1
1
1
I
i;
li
I 1
1 ,r
AVENUE _ o
f
0YIts
4 y .
O
CAVES ENGLISH STREET ADDITION
PRELIMINARY PLAT and
PUD( approved 12 -9 -85)
R''- tachment 3
6
J ,!
f
s
i
1
1 I
t
1 \
1 \
1
1
1 1
1
I
1 tip.
1 _
1 e
1
1 1
1
1
1 eb
1
I 1 _
1'
1 I{O
t
1
1
1
I
i;
li
I 1
1 ,r
AVENUE _ o
f
0YIts
4 y .
O
CAVES ENGLISH STREET ADDITION
PRELIMINARY PLAT and
PUD( approved 12 -9 -85)
R''- tachment 3
6
J ,!
f
s
i
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said city on the day f
p.m.1986 at 7
Y
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. initiated a conditional use
permit to revise Lot One, Block One of' Cave's English Street '
planned
g Addition
p ed unit development from a single to a double dwelling lot. Allotherlotscontinuetobedesignatedforsingledwellinguse.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use P ermit is
as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was initiated b Ed Cavey and
Sons, Inc-o pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances,
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the MaplewoodPlanningCommissiononMarch17, 1986. The lannin commissionPgan
recommended to the city council that said permit be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a ublic hearingg on
1986. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All
persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard
and present written statements. The council also considered reportsandrecommendationsofthecitystaffandplanningcommission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described conditional use permit revision be approved on the
basis of the following findings -of -fact:
1. The revised use is in conformity with the city's
comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of the zoningcode.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or g eneral welfare,
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operatedtobecompatiblewiththecharacterofthatzoningdistrict.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare,smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
7 Attachment 4
60 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access
or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7, The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8.0 The use would not create excessive additional requirements
at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the city,
90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural
and scenic features into the development design.
100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects,
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
Adherence to the original site plan, dated November 7 1985 as
revised herein and as required to be amended by the Maplewood CityCouncilonDecember9, 1985, unless a change is approved b tgPPy he city'scommunitydesignreviewboard.
Adopted this day of , 1986.
Seconded by Ayes- -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) Ss, I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify thatYy I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
1986, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a
full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate sealP of the citythisdayof , 1986.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
bw. ... ,t..k:.., :;•...._ »v. ..,.. ......•
A. Planned Unit Deve 1 o meat Revision--North of County .Road B F
E
Secretary Olson said the proposal is to amend thee conditional use permit topermitadoubledwellingratherthanasingledwellingononeofthe; lotswithinthedevelopment. Staff is recommend i n approval1 of the r
outlined in the report.
g PP request as
Sam Cave was present at the meeting ad i ndi Gated he had nothing further toaddtothestaffreport.
Chairman Axdahl asked if there was anyone rypresent ' who wished to comment ontheproposal. ,
No comments received.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the lanp Wing commission recommend the citycounciltheresolutiontoreviseCave's English Street Additiongdditionplannedunitdeve1opmenttoallowLotOne, Block One to be used for adoubledwelling .
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes--Commissioners Axdahl ,Barrett, Cardinal, El lefson, Fischer, Larson Si mun i •g d k, S 1 ette n, Whitcombtcomb
J'
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
City Manag
Associate Planner. -
PUD, Ri ht- _ Way Vacations
Johnson
E
g of
and •nglish, south of Count relimin platEdCaveandSonsr ..
Road g
s.Inc.Cave's En .gllsh Street Second •March 31, 1986 1 b
Endors@d.. .
SUMMARY -- ....,....Io di'iRequestsRejecto
l . A pprove a planned u development (pUD .g lots and 36 condo )
forsingle-dwell 1 Ve small.-llf _lunits of
2 (see page 11).Approve the vacationcation of existing streetreet and alley rights-Of-way,ht3 • Approve a prel
g s -of -way.plat (see Page lf)Comment
This proposal i s consistent widwellingsoEnEnglish th the Comprehens'g sh Street wo lve Plan. The singlebeacrossthestreetthmorecompatibleglethepreviousla
e with the homestownhouses,Y approved double dwellingsngs and
Lot 6 of the proposed plat cananarea-
p not be dwidestSealerdeveloped without conproSincethestruction ofprojectonMarch6shouldbwould24, Lot
e
cit council denied .Prohibit developme designated as an o .
this
would still lik without council a
utlOt• Thi -sethecondominiumsa
approval The developerw • approved, so th .single dwellings ill know wh to ex
at buyers of thethefuture. The p expect wh LUD• however , should of 6 i s developed icontractingforanare
be conditioned .t
n
a storm sewer on the cl tYProject.
Recommendati
1 • Approve the reso on pa 12dwellingsofuti
and 36 condominiu to approve a pUD for .cond . t i on that the
ms as shown on
r f i Ve singleecondominiumsshallpa11 subject to thcitycontractsforllnotbcon e
an area storm water structed until theproject,2. Approve the resolution on page 14streetrights-Of--way t
that cr
o vacate the obsolethirty_ foot wide utility •
oss this site, sub '
to alley andilitYeasementCent
JeCt to retaininSecondAvenueright-Of-way running from
centered on the
o
a
Center line of theEnglishStreet, 23APProveCave' s E l
feet east,
sub' English StreetSectto: Second Additio . re, 'P liminary plat,
a • Lot si shall beintention
men
designated as an ou tlottoallowdevelo . It is the ciSealerprojectiscontracted
p t of the outlot wh tY sfor , an area storm
b 'City engineer a
plans, pproval of final utili tY, grading and drainageWage
c• A panding Basemen
r
the city eng
t shall be shown on Lo 'Lot Six as requiredquired b Y
d. Submission of a signed developer'ssurety, to the city engineer
p s agreement,,with rutilityYgWeer. for. repair °f E equiredyconnectionsaremadeanEnglishshStreetwherdforconstructionwithintheriht- °n of sewer and
water services wit
g of -way,
e • Recording of the
rights-Of-way
e resolutions of Vacation for alley and streetaythatexistonthisisrequested, re finalsitebefo t
Plat approval
f. Increase the posed ten-foot •south line of Lot
proposed t wide easement runningwidth* e and part of Lot Six to along th
f i f teen feet of
g• Omit the utility easement not within the boundary of the lap th• Switch the •
accommodate proposed lot width Ofommodatethewiderutility
Lots Four and Five toityeasementrequirediin _condition f,
BACKGROUND
description3
Gross and net area: 5.16
2. Existing land use: undeveloped
A
f Surrounding Land Uses
North: single dwelling t •g 22 English and County Road B
East: Burlington Northern Rail 'Railroad right -of -way
South: Single dwelling t •g 2156 English Street and .city ark •Y P property
West: English Street. Across the -- •street are three single dwellin srangingfrom85to95feetin
ree
g width . Two of the th dwel 1 i nonEnglishStreet, g s front
Past Actions ,
7- 26 -82:
Council conditionally approved thehe English Manor planned unitdevelopment (page 8 for •g ) 72 double - dwelling and town hou 'That development included this site and Cal
se units.
veAvenueAdditionsnorthofCountRoadB
s English Street and CopeY
7- 25 -83:
Counc canceled the Engl Manor planned unit developmentrelgment aprelplatapprovals. The applicant
p
s'Pp nt had gone out of business ,
12 -9 -85:
Council approved:
1. Cave's English Street Addition, street and alley vacations and aplannedunitdevelopmentPUDsinglewidth ( ) of 23 si lots r •from 60 to 88 feet for interior g ranging In
corner lots, lots and 85 to 12 feet forRefertothemaponpage
2. A zoning code amendm ent to allow small -lot single dwellings (60 to75feetinwidth) as permitted es In R -2, double - dwelling districtsorRM, residential ,when planned f 1 medium use.
Planning
1. Land use plan designation: g ation: RM, res medium density,
2 • Permitted density: 22 people /nPt-
3. Proposed density: 16.6 eo •16 .6 people/net acre (five single dwellingng and36condominiums.
4. Density approved for the Englishgush Manor development: 12,9people /net acre (22 units).
C
5: Policy criteria from the plan:
a. Page 18 -8: Residential areas should be encouraged, plannedg
and guided to provide a variety of housing types within
neighborhoods,
b. Page 18 -9: Innovation in subdivision design and housingg
development shall be encouraged through the use of devises such as
cluster and planned unit development concepts
c. Page 18 -30: The RM land use classification is designed for
such housing types as single dwellings on small lots, double
dwellings, town houses and mobile homes.
60 Zoning: R -1, single dwelling
7* Compliance with land use laws:
a. Section 412 -851 of State Statutes allows a city o vacate any + • Yinterestinpropertywhenthecouncilmakesafindingthatit
appears be in the public interest to do so."
b. Section 36 -439 requires council approval of a conditional use
permit to develop an outlot.
i
Citizen Comments
A survey was sent to the owners of property within 350 feet of the
applicant's site, Of the fourteen respondents, seven were in favorthreehadnocommentandfourhadobjections. The concerns were:
1. Homes on sixty -foot wide lots will make the nei'g'hborhood look
tacky. (This property owner does not front directly on proposed Lots
One through Five)
2. The land should be left undeveloped or used only gforsingledwellings.
30 Increased traffic.
4. The smaller lots will depreciate the other homes in the area
5. Increased noise pollution.
6. Assessments to adjoining property wners for water, sewY , sewer, lightsandstreets.
7. Children will be endangered by the P and when it floods.
8. Condominiums will be incompatible with the existing neighborhoodgiventheirheight, exterior appearance and uncertainty whetherer theywillberentals. Also, the soils are too poor to support these largebuildings.
4
Procedure
1. Planning commission recommendation
2. City council decision following a public hearing
mb
Attachments:
1. Sherwood Glen Neighborhood Land Use Plan Ma P
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. English Manor PUD (1982)
4. Cave's English Street Addition (1985)
5. Preliminary Plat (8 1/2 x 11)
6. Site Plan
7. Resolution (PUD)
8. Resolution (Vacation)
9. Preliminary Plat (separate attachment)
5
or
13 i 14 I 'I 1 IG i1.7 1 18 I h t zol ti I t 2 31
Caves English Street
Addition
al ' I i I I ` _' • I i 1 114i3. zip sI41 X2.1 If ,o y 8 7 • Z, 1
i I
I I I I• 1 5 4 3
i
1S 17 !9 z . . z7r t ,,
220 7' ; 8 9 a Z1 1 z I I AI 3 a
N.'
to
Z;:. ::;:. :;t :' ° :i.?: '. •: ;: - fi + - . ' I .t::• •::'
12
l 4 t
13 I' 8 1 7 G 4 1. 3 r
Y . ; :; •::
6
28
31 Z417zo
14D. SrJiOOLIDISTINO. 212L.A 12,
A
0.0%AV E.
33
5 O L p
15 114 -
1,
Ic IS IZ 11 10 9 e T (
J L L L
I
T _ w•c.'.-1 f&• 2; • s _ 111» .i.o.I — _ — — 13136jZ - s1 1 I, 2-1 T1 T f12I .3 14 (Ci ty Park jz - V
IZ ( IR ( 02 21 I4 3 e-4 25I Z 2.bIZ.5 130
jL0. %
p BURKE •' VAC AE Doc
a
111. _ _ _ _ _
t9 X10 • 't." _.. Tt _ T !, _ .. _ _ ... . _ ... _ .. _ _ ......
N H L INei1s432 D
1
S.N.6iI1 I t7 Ir1 14 13 12 11 10 5 ! 6 5II I 4 7
itVATeo
I 1 12 3 14 15 1G 1 - II ? i6 19 w19 20 21 2 1•-r S
t . I 34I40
Zr
5,e J.1 .1.1.1VACATEDD +Doc '7.95 ....•.
a.
t — '
J1. a•L.• Ste' S Z. S of to „ • «
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
7 Attachment Two
Q
N
iTitITy
EASEMENT
560 _
E3 GK11 20 J- I — PK4I
1171 /6 t , 3 1 8 Q 1
2 i 3 s
i ( (
c0
4 $1 I I , 4 ' d 1 CO
16
51
I ,
3
1 ' -- '- 1
1 1 B p K 1 I ,: r I ,
i •
1 1 215118:1 / f;• ..• , I I , . ' ; ' .
t t 1 I -U ; -L -.L _ -;` 1 I I I I 1
T IL
CO
too' "' ,` "' r - T -- - - -}•. u_ 6 ... - -
F 2' . _ , t i r, 7 Virgo ,
ji
11 0
3
4
I Q 1 .r' r
Ac '
113 1 I .. L iT T
7 T I I
QQ
p I I w
C4
A . a' 121 W
t Ac
IT
I
I ••' s 1 0 a I SC
I i5 11 -1 t I ,• . ,.
I 1 I
t , '
g ' ?o •I t , 4
i -{• rT: - : - Q r -, _ r _ r -- Applicant's Site
r 3 ,
n1 X31411 I, ° .,I/
e 5 - r Y °
2 N
B K 1 '
I1i .. I
I _ _ v r-.1o . -
CO Z - • .... .. l-
K - • +• --oL , t
BLOTKaoo 0 '
t n r --71 1 C3'
31 1
4
r
1. .j.. A J`'' .Yi 1 2t' - TI
cc
T:- _ - N j - -T- '-
I i I 1 i I .• ;'
1 I I 1 i I t
L L , _ J.... 0 .L L2201
r --I t •:.. - T T -
i
EP .GL I SH '10,110IR TC #A.N F!p.USE PUD
Approved 7-27--32)
8 Attachment Three
4
N
V.r
PE
s
7
1
I
1 N •
I _j •ro .
f. i i
1 _ •
ice" .,: iso a
i 1
1 \ •s eo se
1 1 I 1
1 fie
j 1 140
1 1 ,
t ; t
140
AVENUE VO
7r F
W, ; _
r ry
i'
1
1 r,
Proposed Cave's English Street
2nd Addition
f
CAVES ENGLISH STREET ADDITION
PRELIMINARY PLAT
f
Approved 12 -9 -85)
9 Attachm F
w
CO
I '
w
w
F— •;
to -. •, ,
obio
C •. `
a 1 W o
U
c: } o N ,
ctt
LN I U ` do U
13EOCK 3
NO +
Co
fJ.-OF
7 _ (f) CO
Cl) o n
z
op
f
C i o CL
N '
CL OD C
0
cc . J ' ` U .+s I•J
N 3
Ot
Cu
f:
r
a $ITE PLAN
11
Attachment Six
Q
N
s 0
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in -the council chambers in said City on the day of
1986 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons initiated a conditional use permit for
planned unit development of five single dwellings and 36 condominiums
at the following- described property:
Lots 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 12, lying outh of Countyy
Road "B "; all of Block 13 and Lots 1, 2 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 20, all
in Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota and vacated
streets and alleys accruing.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is
as follows:
110 This conditional use permit was initiated by Ed Cave and
Sons, Inc. pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances,
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood
Planning Commission on April 7, 1986. The plannin g commission
recommended to the city council that said permit be
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
1986. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All
persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard
and present written statements. The council also considered reportsandrecommendationsofthecitystaffandplanningcommission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of
the following findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety or general wel f are .
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5* The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare,smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
12 Attachment Seven
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access
or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
80 The use would not create excessive additional requirements
at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be
detrimental to the welfare of the city.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's. natural
and scenic features into the development design.
100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan, dated February 18, 1986, unless
a change is approved by the city's community design review board
20 The condominiums shall not be constructed until the city
contracts for an area storm sewer project,
Adopted this day of , 1986 .
Seconded by Ayes --
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the Yda of
1986, with the original on file in my office, and. the same is a
full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city
this day of , 1986.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
r
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the CityCounciloftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held
in the council chambers in said city on the day of ,
1986 at 7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons initiated proceedings to vacate the
public interest in the following described rights -of -way located in
the Sabin Addition, Ramsey County:
1. Sandhurst and Second Avenues from the East right-of-way line
of English Street to the West line of the Burlington Northern Railroad
right -of -way;
2. The alley right -of -way in Block 13;.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows:
10 A majority of the owners of property abutting aid alley and
street rights-of-way
g Y
have signed a petition for this vacation;
2. This vacation was reviewed by the plannin g commission on
1986. The planning commission recom-
mended to the city council that this vacation be approved,
30 The city council held a public hearin g on
1986 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was publishedandmailedpursuanttolaw. All persons resent at this heariP ng were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
council also considered reports and recommendations of the c'i ty staf f
and planning commission.
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described street and
alley rights -of -way, public interest in.the property will accrue to
the following described abutting properties, all in the Sabin
Addition, Ramsey County:
Lots 15 -27, Block 12
Lots 1 -24, Block 13
Lots 1 -11, Block '20
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that
it is in the public interest to rant the above - described vacationgcation on
the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The alley right -of -way does not serve as a primary of
secondary access to the adjoining property.
14 Attachment Eight
2. The adjoining properties are undeveloped andd under oneownership, with general site access from Count Road B and EnglishStreet,Y gush
39 Replatting of the site is necessary to eliminate the P entres - -
substandard -sized platted lots.
This vacation of Second Avenue is subject to the retention noon of a
thirty -foot wide utility -easement, centered on the Second Avenue
right -of -way center line, from the east ri ht -of -li 'g ne o f EnglishishStreettotheNortherlyextensionoftheEastlineofLot7, Block 20SabinAddition, Ramsey County. '
Adopted this day of 1986.
Seconded by.Ayes--
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed ClerkoftheCityofMaplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attachedYPched and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
1986 with the original on file in my office and the same is a fulltrueandcompletetranscripttherefrominsofarasthesamerelates tothevacationoftheabove - described alle * and street rights-of-way.Y
Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal fPo the citythisdayof , 1986.
City Clerk
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
15
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Code Amendment -- Parkin g Action by Council:
DATE: March 5, 1986
Endorse
SUMMARY Modifi ,...
Rejecte
Request Date
10 Amendment of the parking requirements to permit nine -foot wide
parking stalls, rather than ten foot, for 90 degree parking
2. Amendment of the parking requirements to require hard-surfacedced
parking lots and striping.
Reason for the Request
10 The city council, at the joint council /planning commissiopgto
meeting of January 29, 1986, directed staff to draft a code
amendment to allow nine -foot wide parking stalls.
2 The recent amendment of the parkin code did not addres hard
surfaces or striping on parking lots.
Comments
Nine -foot wide parking spaces are the most accepted standardtandard today,based on the survey on page 4. Although there is a greaterpotentialfordentsincardoorswithnine -foot stalls the
still relatively safe,
y are
The city requires hard- surfaced arkin lots 'p g .and striping throughthesiteplanreviewprocess. This olic should be 'P Y put Into
ordinance to make it more enforceable. Hard - surfaced arkin lots.P garecleaner, more aesthetic, facilitate drainage better, are dustfreeandarelessofamaintenanceproblemsincetheyholduplongerthanthealternative- -dirt or gravel.
Staff considered whether future city park parking lots should be
exempt from the paving and striping requirement, and surveyed 21
area cities. (See page 5 .) Some of Maplewood's arks are notof
used during the winter, which may lessen the need for paving. The
majority (81 g0) of the cities survey, however, require paving, so
hard surfacing of the park parking lots would not be out of
character with these neighboring communities. Requiring av
0
andqgPgstripingoffuturecityparkparkinglotswouldavoidcomplaintsfromtheprivatesectorthatthecityusesadoublestandard,
Recommendation
Approval of the attached code amendment requiring minimum parkingstallwidthsofninefeetandrequiringparkinglotstohavehard
surfaces and striping.
e
BACKGROUND
Past Action
8- 26 -85:
Council amended the parkin requirements •g q to make one conciseParkingordinance. Part of this revision dealt with arkin
ui red that a
P g stalldimensionswhichrequiredall90- degree parking spaces be atleastten -feet wide. Parking stalls for owner -occu ied mu
diagonal s a
P multipledwellingsanddiagpces, however, may be only nine feet wide.
Sample of Car Dimension
Make Dimensions Width Le 'ngth in Feet)
VW Bug 5 x 13.5
Mercury Linx 5.5 x 14
VW Rabbit pickup 5 x 14.5DodgeAries5.5 x 14.5OldsmobileOmega5.5 x 14.5FordF100 (full -size pickup) 6.5 x 1695Fordvan6.5 x 17ChevroletCaprice6.5 x 17.5FordTorino6.5 x 17.5ChevroletKingswoodEstateWagon6.5 x l 8.5
Survey (Parking Space Dimension)
The most often required arkin stall 'P g 1 dimension is 9 by 20 feet.
Survey (Paving of City Park Parkin Lots)
Of the 21 cities surveyed, seventeen r •required paving, one did notaswellasMaplewood) and three encouraged it but h 'g had no specificficrequirement.
1. Recommendation by the community design reviewYgw board.2. First reading by the city council.
3. Second reading by the city council.
jc
Attachments
1 . Ordinance amendment
2. Parking space dimension survey
Paving of park parking lots survey
2
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MINIMUM P ARKI NG, REQUIREMENTS
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 36 -22 b i •s amended and Section 36_22 ffollows (all additions are underlined )
is added as
crossed out) : 1 ned and deletions are
Section 36 -22. Off- Street Parking,
b) Ninety- degree arkin sPgpces shall be at least nine -feet wide and twenty feet long, except '
s. All
g P for owner- occupled multipledwellings. other spaces, including ninety degree stallsowner - occupied multiple - dw g fordwellings, gs. shall be not less than nine feetdeandnineteenfeetinlength (measured parallel w istripinglines) , exclusive of
p th the
access aisles. If a parking spaceabutsacurb, sidewalk or landscaped area,the space may be re
P ea, the required leng ofYreducedbyonefoot .
s A11 parking lots - and associated .ciated drivew shall have ahardsurfaceofbituminoustumionusorconcrAllparkingspacesshallbestriped ---
Section 2. This ordinance - _shat -l- -take -- - - - -- - - -- --- -_ - - -- _and publication. offect upon its passage
Passed by the Maplewood
City Council this dayof1986.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Ayes--
Nays--
3 Attachment 1
4
PARKING SPACE DIMENSION SURVEY
8 -30 -83
City Parking Stall
Stall Dimensions when
abutting9 urb , sidewalkDimensionsmens.ons or landscaped area Aisle Widthth
Coon Rapids 9 X 18 9 x 16Eagan
Brookl n Center
10
8 8
x
x
20
19.5
10 x 18
g 8..x 18
2.4
24.
Vadnais Heights 9 x l8 9 x 16
24
St*'9 x 18 9 x 16
24
Burnsvillelle
8
9
x 16 compact)
20
Plymouth 9
x
x
18
18.5
no change
to
9 24
Fridley
Blaine 1 x 20 26
Crystal
9
9.5
x
x
20
20
25
24
New Brightongton 9 x 20 24
New H 10 x 0 22
old lley 9 x 20 24
No specifiedWhiteBearLake8 • 5 x 20 requirement
Applepp Valley 10 x 20 24
South St. Paul 9 x 20 24
Roseville 9 x 18ColumbiaHeights9x20
20
24
cottage Gg rove 9 x 20 22
Shoreview 9 x 20
No specified
requirement
No.,_ St. Paul 9 X 20 24
No specified
Oakdale 9 x 2 0 requirement
Woodbury 9 x 20 to
NewportP 10 x 20 24
No specified
requirement
4
i.
Attachment 3
5
SORVEY
PAVING OF CITY PARK PARKING LOTS
2 -27 -86
Requires Paving Paving Encouraged
City Paving Not Required but Not Required
Maplewood x
Roseville x
Plymouth x
Brooklyn Center x
Fridley x
Crystal x
New Brighton x
Apple Valley x
St. Paul x
Vadnais Heights x
Little Canada x
Woodbury x Paving may not take lace initially, buPy, t
would be added later.)
West St. Paul x
Cottage Grove x
Columbia Heights x Parking lots with over six spaces must be
paved.)
Maple.Grove x
White Bear Lake x
New Hope x
North St. Paul x
Newport x
Oakdale
Shoreview
x
x
Paving" in this survey refers to asphalt or concrete surfacing,g
Attachment 3
5
B. Code Amendment--ParkingdmentParking Stall Width •and Parkin Lot Pavin -
Thee discussed with Secretar
require minim y Ekstrand the proposed amendumparkingstallwidthsandreuir
amendment which wouldqeparkinglotsbehardsurfaced,Board Member Peterson moved the board recommend to the 'the code amendment rerrin e c i ty council approvaqgminmumparkingstallwidth
p 1 of
s of nine feet ahavehardsurfacesandstriping,
ndrequiringparkinglotsto
Board Member Kochs i ek seconded Ayes--alli1y .
VI VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
X• ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned a •t 8.03 p. m.
3 3 -11 -86
Aotlon by Counc$ •MEMORANDUM 1•
Endorsed.„
Modlfle
TO: City Manager R e j e o t e d,,,..,,,,.,,,
FROM. Assistant City Engineer Date
SUBJECT: Crestview Drive -- Hudson Place Water Main Extensionion
City Project 85 -07
DATE: April 4, 1986
A public hearing has been called by the council for the Aprilp 14meetingfortheabove -named project. The feasibility re ortP , whichhasbeenaccepted, was ordered in conjunction with the tax-incrementcementpackagetoprovideminimumfireprotectiontotheareasouth
Upper Afton Road of I -94andnorthofUPpThereportrecommendsatrunkwatermainalongHudsonPlacefromMcKnightRoadtoSterlingtreetservicemainalongCrestviewDrive
g and a
The estimate project cost is293,000 of which $97,600 is estimated to be recovered throughassessments. The remainingg is recommended as cityparticipationthroughtax- increment funds to offset the costs fortrunkmainandoversizing.
It is recommended that the council hold thee public hearing and orderplansandspecificationsfortheprojectbypassingheattachresolution. g attached
r `
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, after due notice of public hear i n •
improvements g on the constructionofwatermainimPntsonHudsonPlacefromMcKnightRoad.toSterlingStreetandCrestviewDrivefromHudson1,100 -feet south a hea
on Place to approximatelyringonsaidimprovementinaccordance
April
with thenoticedulygivenwasdulyheldonA ..
ersons
P 28, 1986, and the council hasheardall .P desiring to be heard on the matter and hasconsideredthesame; fully
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMINNESOTA, as follows: COUNCIL OF MA PLEWOOD,
1. That it is advisable expedient, .p nt, and necessary that the CityofMaplewoodconstructwatermainimprovementsonHudsonPlacefromKnightRoadtoSterlingtreetandgCrestvDrivefromHudsonPlacetoapproximately1,100 feet south asdescribedinthenoticeofheari"n thereon
same to be made,
g , and orders the
20 The city engineer is desigg engineer for thisimprovementandisherebydirectedtoreandspecificationsPparefinal plansforthemakingofsaidimprovement,
March 18, 18, 1986
tion by Council
MEMORANDUM
Endorse
Modif i e
To: City Manager Donald Lai s Rejected..
From: D of Publ Safety Kenneth v. Col i i n a.,,. Datete - - =-=
Subject: Liquor License Application of Morgan Patrick Nederhiser,
dba Holiday Inn
All background checks for the above applicant have been completed. We
have developed no information that would prevent the issuing of a l i q u o r
license to Mr. Nederhiser.
KVC: j s
cc City Clerk
Liquor File
86- 002222
LICENSE N0.
LICENSE FEE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD REC.
110EOTMGUQUORAPPLICiTIC111TFORINTCA
rS APPLiCA"ON SHALL RE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE.
Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be
deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly.
In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: Fora Cor-
poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. Fora part-nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership.
EVERY QUESTION . MUST BE ANSWERED
1, Morgan P. Ned rhiser as Individual -
Individual owner, officer or partner)
for and in behalf of Holiday Inn St. Paul - Maplewood --
hereby for any Sale Intoxicating Liquor Incenseya to be located at .., 780a
in the City of
Give address and legal description)
Maplewood County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No.
95 of Maplewood.
2. Give applicants' date of birth:
17 September 1QG
Day) (Month) (Year)
S. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows:
561 Grand Hill, St. Paul, MN. 55102
501 Ashland Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55102
814 Manon i n Str . , St. Paul, MN
Is the ap a citizen of the United States?Yes
4 pp
If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio
If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner.
r
I
b. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name an address.
Kaye Lynne Crampton 561 Grand Hi 11, St. Paul, MN 55102
6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past (ive years'!
Hotel Management - Holiday Inn Town Square, Hotel Management - Radisson Plaza
11 Mi nnesnta Strom_ St.Pau1 ; MN_.
Hotel Auditing Radisson Plaza,411 Minnesota Str,,St.. Paul, MN. sr%101.
Untp OrPrat inns - 0 ua1 to - Inn - St - _ Paul MN_
Nursing- Midway Manor Inc., 375 N. Lex. Prky. , St. Paul, MN. 55104
Banquet Operations- Radisson St. Paul, 11 E. Kellogg Str., St. Paul, MN.
f
do
7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner NO
If a corporation, date of incorporatio state in
which incorpora amount of authorized ca italizationP
amount of paid in capi
if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta
give purpose of corporatio
name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each:
Name) (Address) (City)
If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this
State? _______. Number of certificate of authority
If this application is for a new Corporation, in a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and
By -taws.
8.On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? _Ground
9.If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? BC
Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license?
Yes
10.Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church de or high school?gra g
N0 _. State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc
11.State name and address of owner of buildin •__- . T L -DOT 111 F n i j ng - - dp rc Plaza uart_f.Q'
Connect i cut 06 41 has owner of building n conne 'g y ton, directly or in-
j directly, with applicant ? — Man aa. er
12.Are the taxes on the above property delinquent ? - NO
13.State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an a licationPP
for a Liquor License rejected by any. municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details
NO
14.Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediatel
preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for
any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail
R a
16. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years
were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or
under Federal Laws, and if, so, give date and details NO
16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the
municipality in which this license is to be issued? N0 .. If so, in what capacity?
17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture,
fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details
I.T.L.-DOT, 111 Founders Plaza Hartford,Connecticut 06141 - owner, may
be refurbishing, '
18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment
in the State of Minnesota? . NO Give name and address of such establishmen
19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer-
enc Norwest Rank St Pahl Whit Beat 0_ener
nt
Mnnarrh _Fnnd Sprvice. mallMN
20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner
which will expire December 31st of this year? Give number of sam
21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the. consumer ? - NO
22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on
the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam -
bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei NO
23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive
from any other business establishment ? ._...Y.
24. State trade name to be u Hg idav Inn St._Paul- Maplewood
25. State name of person that will operate store. M o r o a n P. N e d e r h i s e r
26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number --58-165-1505
27. If off sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor b vehicle? IfY ._AAA.._... so,
state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner lor current year
a
28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is bean made le8aegmad
plans and specifications with this application.
296 Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows
0. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish .financial ste-
ment of each partner.
1. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock-
tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity b number of customersrs and any other .
pertinent data) Cocktail loung with recorded music and Restaurant seating 250.
2. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the
answer to No. 31 above _ Ho11day Inn Town Square -411 Minnesota Str. St-Pau l MN
Radisson Plaza -411 Minnesota Str. 'St. Paul, MN
ual it Inn-v W. 7th Str. St.Paul, M
E 83. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all t wYPYalas of the StateofMinnesotagoverningthetaxationandthesaleofintoxicatingliquor; rules and regulationspromulgatedbytheLiquorControlCommissioner; and a ordinances of the munici •andIherebycertifythatIhavereadthefore :municipality;
questions that th answe aid questionsaretrueofmyownknowledge. i
Subscribed and sworn to before me this (Si ature of Applicant)
d of 19. •
OMYWTAARY FU8LC- MINNESO'TA
WAS41NMON OOUIM
CM- ONO NOV. 90.1 1
Y
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK
FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD.
G , WAA911 I
Action by Counoi:L:
April 8, 1986
Endorse
MEMORANDUM ]Rejected
To: City Manager Donald Lais
From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collins
Subject: Ambulance
In reviewing the attached memorandum from Paramedic Coordinator Robert
Vorwerk regarding the bid opening for the purchase, of .a new modular
ambulance, I find several areas,.. of concern wi t the low bidder., As
pointed out in the memorandum, the warranties are quite different on the
modular unit itself and on the electrical system in the unit:
The floor insulation does not meet our specifications. The only floor
insulation is a sprayed —on coating of cork,
Officer Vorwerk's memorandum says that the Q2B siren is not included in
their bid. However, in checking with NCM, we find it is included..
One of our concerns is service availability. NCM does not have a central
service location. Road Rescue does:,.
In checking the compartmentalization of the unit, we find that some of
the compartments are not compatible to our equipment.,
We had occasion to inspect an ambulance manufactured by Mo.bile'Med and
sold by NCM -and found that it is a nice ambulance; but while on a test
drive, we did notice that it had a lot of road noise inside, which we
feel is due largely to the lack of i nsul ati'on i n . the floor..
Due to the areas of concern addressed in this memorandum, we recommend
that the bid be awarded to Road Rescue at a cost of $56,778,
KVC: is
cc Captain Nelson
Paramedic Coordinator Vorwerk
Paramedic File
Vehicle File
3
Ap r i 1 8, 1986
MEMORANDUM
To: Chief Collins
From: Paramedic Coordinator Robert Vorwerk
Subject: Ambulance Bid Recomme_n_dati on
The bids for a 1986 ambulance were opened on March 27, 1986, at 10:00 a.m. ,
in the City Manager's office. In attendance were:
Donald La City Manager
Robert Vorwerk Ma Pol ire 'De.partment
James Worm NCM
Craig Schauffert Road Rescue
James Embertson Maplewood Fire'Marshal
Two competitive bids were received at that time.. NCM Sales made a bid of
53,810, and Road Rescue bid $56,778.: Mr. Worm did not include in the bid
the cost of a Federal . Q2B siren or i nstallati on as. speciIf i.cati on called
for; and, therefore, this would pos s i b l y ' add on to the cost ($1,136) of t h i s
bid.
As to compl and /or comparison, it is di.fficult to note any differences
or variations between the two specifications, as NCM submitted a basic
standard ambulance design but did not address specific equipment or design
as our specifications do.
Mr. Worm stated at the bid opening the design died not meet our specifica—
tions, of the modular floor construction and wou d be. utilizing a different
alternator system than what we called for.:.
In reviewing the two specifications, several items should be noted:
NCM Road Rescue
Modular Warranty 15 years . Lifetime
Electrical Warranty 24 months/24,000-miles' 36 months /36., 000 miles
At this time, NCM did not have a demo available for vi and I cannot find
another service in the State of Minnesota that has purchased a rig.,..
I am concerned about availabili of serv.i!,ce.. As indicated in the bid from
NCM, they only have one person who does service work; and as the units are
actually built in Decatur, Indiana, service would be questionable.
Road Rescue has a proven service record on our six units, and they are local.
Because of these specific major concerns, as well as others,: I would
recommend awarding the bid to Road Rescue despite the difference i n b i d
prices. I feel that the difference can be easily justified:
REV; j s
MEMORANDUM
To. Action by Council:
City Manager
FROM: Director of Community DevelYpt En.dorseS ..,..._,,....UBJECT: Ramsey County Solid Waste Master PlanDATE: April 3, 1986 .e
Rejecte
Date
Council tabled this item from February 10 to April 14.
The current draft of Ramsey County's solid waste master lan 'P contains fouritemsthatareofi snteresttothecity:
1. The county intends to license all garbage 'g g haulers this year that
ioperate n the county. This should not affect our existing ci license fgarbagehaulers, g Y or
2. The county encourages individual cities •to start organizing privatecollectionofgarbage. Organized collection is a method b which '
specificif' Y the ctysetsuppisdistrictsandcontractsforthecollectioninthesedistrictswithprivatecompanies. A frees stem as we haveY now, allows the homeowner toselectanyprivatecompanytheywish. The.county may r a chanYq in statelawin1988givingthecountytheauthoritytoinitiateoranized '9 collection.Currently, only the city has the authority.
3. The county may enact a mandator recycling ordin '
1'
y y 9 nce i n 1988 i f voluntaryrecyclingingeffortsdonotmeetthecounty's established goals. The count w'take the lead in establishin Y illbishiacurbsiderecyclingprogram.
4. The county encourages cities to initiate theireir own in —house recyclingprograms, such as office paper, and expand our leaf composti n ram. ro9p 9
This plan goes to the county environmental services committee on Aprilpri1 21andthecountyboardonMay5. Any comments from the council should be madeattheApril14thmeeting.
V
C
N. - 3
MEMORANDUM
Aotion by CountTo: Don Lais, City Manager
From: Robert D. Ode and Directorrector of Parks & Recreatio Endorse
Subj: Neighborhood Park Acquisition Charge Moth fioAsAffectedByPlanAmendment: Density Conversion Change Re oDate: March 18 1986 cte
Date
The Maplewood Planning Commission will be recommending o the City Council9Y
a change in the density for the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the 1980 cen
sus. The attached staff report from the Director of Community DevelopmentYpindicatessomemajorchangesinthenumberofpeopleperunitinthediffer-
ent types of dwellings. Since the Neighborhood Park Acquisition Charge is
determined by multiplying th per person cost for development and ac q uisi-tion of parks in a community times the number of people per unit -any reduc-
tion in the people per unit reduces the P.A.C. funds.
The Park and Recreation Commission on March 17th discussed the effects of
the reduction in the people per unit and recommends to the City Council
that the Neighborhood P.A.C. Charge be increased to $95 per person.
In keeping with Maplewood Code Sec. 21 -56, it is recommended that the CityCouncilbyresolutionapprovetheaverageacreacquisitioncostbeincreased
to $5,000 per acre and the average acre development cost for Neighborhood
parks be increased to $9,000 per acre with the City financing 50% of the
development cost.
The effect of the $95 per person will affect the Park Acquisition Charge as
follows:
Type of Dwellin
Single Dwelling
Double Dwelling
Town Houses
Mobile HOmes
Apartment (3 -4 Units)
Apartment (5+ Units)
Apartment (elderly)
Present Present
People Unit $79.50 /Perso
4.1
4.1
3.7
2.5
2.9
2.0
1.1
326
652
295
200
230
160
88
Proposed Recommended
People /Unit 95 /Person
3.4 323
2.7 512
2.7 256
2.5 237
2.9 275
2.0 190
1.1 99
Ili fforonro
3)
140)
39)
37
45
30
11
RESOLUTION FOR PARK ACQUISITION CHARGE
FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
WHEREAS Maplewood Code Sec. 21 -46 recognizes the need for neighborhood
parks, establishes standards and improvement guidelines for such and
provides methods of acquisition and development, and
WHEREAS Sec. 21 -56 (a) states that the City Council shall act to adopt
by resolution the average acre acquisition cost and the average acre
development cost for neighborhood parks throughout the City, and
WHEREAS the intention the Ordinance is to provide for future quality
of life through the acquisition and development of park -open space, and
WHEREAS the costs of acquisition of property and the development of parks
has continued to increase, therefore
The City Council of Maplewood establishes that effective
the average acre acquisition cost will be $5,000 per acre, and the develop-P
ment cost w i l l be $9,000 per acre, with the. City financing 50% of the
development costs.
t
MEMORANDUM
To: Park and Recreation Commissioners
From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreati n
Sub j : P l a n Amendment: Density .Conversion Table
Date: March 12, 1986
Please find attached a memorandum from the Director of Community PDevelo ment
which discusses the density changes that are being recommended b the PlanninggCommissiontotheCityCouncil. As the report reflects, t h i s request is in-
tended to bring the City into conformity with the 1970 census which indicates
that there are fewer people per unit per acre in our City.
If the changes in density are approved by the City Council, the Parks and Rec-
reation income to the Park Acquisition Charge will be affected. As an example:at the present time a single dwelling home has 4.1 people per unit and when
this is multiplied times $79.50 per person, we receive $326.00 toward our P.A.C.
fund. Under the proposed plan, the number of people per unit would be reduced
to 3.4 for single dwellings, which would mean a reduction to $270.00 for P.A.C.
Attached is a Density Conversion Table indicating the effects of changing our
present $79.50 per person to other possibilities.
The present $79.50 per person is determined b adding $4,200.00 er acre forY9P
acquisition and 112 of $7,500.00 per acre for development and dividing the sum
by 100 people.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that we request that the City Council approve that the
average acre acquisition cost be increased to $5,000 and to increase the -develo
ment cost to $10,000 per acre with
p
p the City. financing 509' of the developmentcost.
The above recommendation will then increase our present $79.50 per person to
100.00 per person. As the chart indicates, the single family dwelling will
increase from the present $326 to $340, but the double dwelling will drop from
652 to $540, townhouses from $295 down to $270, but mobile homes will increase
from $200 to $250, and apartment houses will increase also. (See chart)
Type of Dwe l l i n
Single Dwelling
Double Dwelling
Town Houses
Mobile Homes
Apartment (3 -4 Units)
Apartment (5+ Units)
Apartment (elderly)
DENSITY CONVERSION TABLE
Present Present Proposed Present
People Unit PAC People /Unit 79.50 /Person Loss 90 100 110
4.1 326 3.4 270 56)306 340 374
4.1 652 2.7 430 222)486 540 594
3.7 295 2.7 215 80)243 270 297 31
2.5 200 2.5 200 0 225 250 275 4P 3 7 37
2.9 230 2.9 215 15)261 290 319 7 yS
2 .. 0 160 2.0 151 9)180 200 220 O 30
1.1 88 l . l 88 0 100 110 121 y1 j.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Plan Amendment: Density Conversion Table
DATE: February 26, 1986
Request
Gene Wilson and Clyde Fish requested, at the November 25, 1985
council meeting, that the city update the density conversion table
in the comprehensive plan to reflect the 1980 Census. The changes
proposed by staff are shown on Attachment Two. Attachment One is
the existing table.
Reason for the Request
1. Page A -2 of the comprehensive plan states that ".the city
intends to review these figures every five years, as census data
becomes available, and make such adjustments as may be considered
necessary." (See page 4 The current figures are based on the
1970 Census,
2. Developers would like to build more units per acre. This was
one of the concerns expressed to the council last October by a
group of developers.
Ef f ects of the Request
10 Except for mobile homes, there would be more units per acre
and less open space especially for town houses.
The 1980 Census shows a reduction in the number of people per unit
since the 1970 Census, because of a steady decline in the birth-
rate, Reducing the people per unit on page 5 , increases the units
per acre allowed. This is because the city bases maximum densities
on people, rather than buildings. All planned residential land is
designated as RH, residential high density (34 people /net acre) ,
RM, residential medium density (22 people /net acre) or RL,
residential low density (14 people /net acre). The number of units
per acre is determined by dividing the maximum people per net acre
allowed by the people per unit listed on the density conversion
table. If the people per unit is decreased, the units per acre
will increase.
The second table on page 5 compares the existing and proposed
number of units per acre. The most significant increase would be
with town houses. Town house units would increase by 34% compared
to 5% increase for apartments.
Increasing the density means less open space. To visualize this,
look at the existing site plan on page 7 of the recently completed
Lake Ridge Park town houses on White Bear Avenue, south of Radat z
Avenue. It has a density of 5.2 units per acre. Six units per
acre are allowed. The proposed change would allow 8.1 units per
acre or an additional 13 units. ( See the site plan on page 8 . )
Increasing density would provide more incentive for developers and
make Maplewood more competitive with other suburbs. The enclosed
survey on page 9 of the 20 cities closest to Maplewood in
population shows the maximum allowed number of units per acre
compared to Maplewood's current and proposed densities:
Survey Cities Maplewood- Current Maplewood- Proposed
units /acre) (units /acre) (units /acre)
RH (apartments) 17.5 17.0 17.9
RM (town houses) 9100 6.0 8.1
RH = residential high density
RM - residential medium density
2. Mobile home densities would remain the same.
The current maximum density in RM acres is 8.8 units per acre. The
1980 .Census would increase this to 11.3 units per acre. Current
mobile home park densities are as follows:
Rolling Hills (Century and Ivy) 5.1 units /acre
Beaver lake (Maryland Avenue) 6.3 units /acre
Town and County (Highway 61) 10.9 units /acre
English Street, south of Frost Avenue 19 units /acre
The only undeveloped land zoned for mobile home park use is the
adjacent parcel to the north of the Rolling Hills park. Allowing a
density of 11.3 units per acre would be inconsistent with the
density of the Rolling Hills park.
3. The new table omits bedroom units and establishes two
categories of apartments.
This is the format that the census information was given in. It is
simpler to use. A separate category for 3 to 4 unit apartments is
needed, since they are more similar to town houses in density, than
apartments.
4. A new table converting people /unit to units /acre has been
added.
It is easier to understand-density in units per acre.
59 The city's utility systems are adequately sized to handle the
proposed increase in units.
Ad vantages
1. The city will be more competitive with other suburbs in
attracting residential developers, particularly town house
developments.
2
20 The new format is easier to use and understand.
Disadvantages
1. There would be less open space, particularly for town house
projects.
2. If the birthrate significantly increases, the population in
neighborhoods constructed under the proposed density table may
exceed the maximum planned population designation in the land use
plan. Although, this will average out city -wide.
Recommendation
Approval of the enclosed resolution on page 13 updating the density
conversion table to reflect the 1980 Census. .
jc
Attachments
1. Existing Density Conversion Table
2. Proposed Density Conversion Table
3. Existing Site Plan- -Lake Ridge Park
4. Possible Site Plan- -Lake Ridge Park
5. Twenty City Survey
6. Adjacent City Survey
7. Resolution
3
To be amended
r
1 - •6
d•EXISTING
DENSITY CONVERSION TABLE
Single dwellings: 4.1 rsons u9pe nit /.
Double d we l I i ngs: 4.1 rsons uni tpe .
Mobi le horses: 2.5 . pe i t,!rsons /un •
Apartments:
A,
Efficiency: 1.1 person /unit
1 bedroom: 1.4 person/unit
r
2 bedroom: 2.5 persons uni t
3 bedroom: 3.3 rsonsP uni t /
4 bedroom: . 4 persons /unitr
Apartments for the Elderly:
C
1 bedroom: 1.1 erson uni t .p
2 bedroom: 2.0 rsons uni ! . k
s
Pe /
Townhouses:
1 bedroom:1.9 persons /uni t
J
r.'
2 bedroom: .. 3.3 persons/unit • .
3 bedro • 4 persons /unit
4 bedroom: 4.2 arsons unit
ofp /
The above figures ore not intended • •9 to reflect the actual people per unit of any specific
F project. They are an estimated maximum averag density f 'g ty or the City, .based on the
1970 Census and supplemented with studies •PP done by the Ci of actual condiMons in. •
lWbplewood at that time. The City intends to review these figures every f'F Y g . v ry eve years, as
dataata becomes available, and make such adjustments as may be consideredi . y
necessary .
Attachment 1
r
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PAGE A -2 OF THE PLAN
Numbers in parentheses are based on the existing densities. Theyareincludedforcomparisonpurposesonlyandwouldbeomittedon
the amended page.)
DENSITY CONVERSION TABLE
Type of Dwelling People /Unit
Single Dwellings 394 4.1)
Double Dwellings 2.7 4.1)
Town Houses 2 , 7 3 , 7) a
Mobile Homes 295 2.5)Apartments (3 -4 units /building)2.7 2.9 b
Apartments (5+ units /building)1.9 .2.0) c
Apartments (elderly)1.1 1.1
TABLE CONVERTING PEOPLE /UNIT TO UNITS /ACRE
Type of Dwelling
Single Dwellingl
Double Dwellings
Town Homes
Mobile Homes
Apartments (3 -4 U /bldg)
Apartments (5+ U /bldg)
Apartments (elderly)
Maximum Allowed Densit in Units /Acre
RL RM RH
42 3.4)
5.2 3.4)
5.2 3.8) a
5.2 4.8) b
7.4 7.0)c
12.7 12.7)
6.6 5.4)
8.1 5.4)
8.1 6, 0) a
8.8 8.8)
8.1 7.6)b
1.6 1190)c
20.0 20.0)
12.5 8.3)
12.5 19.3)a
12.5 11.7)b
17.9 17.0)
30.9 30.9)
Notes
1The maximumm a l l o wed density shall be determined by theminimumlotareasinthezoningode. If minimuminimum area lots foreachunitarenotplatted, the maximum number of units shall bedeterminedbydividingthenetprojectareabtheminimum 'ed lot area,
Y requir-
2The maximum allowed dens i. ty shall be determined by Staterequiredminimumlotareas.
The above numbers are based on the 1980 Census exceptpt for mobilehomes. Each of the three maximum population densities from thelanduseplanwasdividedbythecombinedeoleperPPpunitforeachtypeofdwellingreportedinthecensus. Mobile homes are at ht e
5 Attachment 2
F _ i
1970 Census figure to keep future mobile home arks consistents •P tent withthecharacterofthemostrecentlydevelopedarks. The 'Y P p e cityintends • to review all density figures after each Federal Census andmakeadjustmentsasneeded,
The following to be deleted when adopted)P )
aAssumes an equal1 •q mix of 2 and 3 bedroom units (source: FredHaas, Mary Anderson Construction),
bAssumes an equal mix . •q of 2 and 3 bedroom units,
CBased on a bedroom mix of 1.9% efficiencies, 43.4% one -
bedrooms, 52.1$ two - bedrooms and 2.6% three - bedrooms sou •rce.
Maplewood survey of apartment units),
6
r
J
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
p}piMr'J
MEMORANDUM
Anti by Council:
City Manager Endorse
Thomas Ekstrand -- Associate Planner Modified,..„
Code Amendment- -Home Occupation Signs
Counc i i member Anderson e te ""' "`°"'
April 2, 1986
SUMMARY
Request
Amendment of the sign code to increase the maximum allowed size of a home
occupation sign from two square feet to six square feet.
Reason for the Change
Councilmember Anderson.requested this revision on behalf of John Monette at 2060
Barclay Street: Mr. Monette is conducting a power tool repair shop at his home
and has been displaying a six square —foot sign on his garage. Council renewed
Mr. Monette's conditional use permit on October 9, 1985 for five years, subject to
compliance with the sign code by reduci the size of his sign to two square feet.
Comments
The intent of the home occupation ordinance is to allow unobtrussive home
businesses that preserve the residential character of neighborhoods. The two
square —foot sign allowed is not intended for advertising, but only for an
identification.
The enclosed survey (page 2) shows that nine of the 19 suburbs surveyed do not
allow home occupation signs. Of the ten who do, the median size is three square
feet. Only one city allows a six square —foot sign,
Recommendation (requires at least four votes)
Approve the enclosed ordinance increasing the maximum size of a home occupation
sign from two to three square feet.
mb
Attachments:
1. Survey
2. Amendment
t
Mu
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15,
16.
17.
18.
190
nic pality
Burnsville
Fridley
Golden Valley
Apple Valley
Maple Grove
Columbia Heights
No. St. Paul
New Brighton
Woodbury
MAPLEWOOD
White Bear Lake
Newport
Brooklyn Center
Blaine
Roseville
So. St. Paul
Cottage Grove
Plymouth
Crystal
Coon Rapids
HOME OCCUPATION SIGNAGE
4 -1 -86
Prohibit
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
2
Allow imum Size)
2 square feet
2 square feet
2 square feet
2.5 square feet
2.5 square feet
3 square feet
3 square feet
3 square feet
4 square feet
4 square feet
6 square feet
Placement
wall only
wall only
wa 11 or ground
wall or ground
wall or ground
wall or ground
wall or ground
wa l l or ground
wall or ground
wall or ground
wall or ground
Attachment One
f
ORDINANCE N0,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HOME OCCUPATION
SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 36- 316(2) is amended as follows additions are underlined,1ned,deletions are crossed out):
2) One fascia sign of not more than twe- 2- —three (3)square } feet
i area giving the name and occupati of the occupant of a b u i l d i n g
carrying on a home occupation as defined in the city zoning
ordinance.
Section 2, This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication,p p g pub i cati on.
Passed by the Maplewood
City Council this
day .of 11986.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk Ayes--
Nays --
3 Attachment Two
MEMORANDUM
Acti by Council:
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: City Manager Rridors a -- - pR-- ---r
RE : May 26 Council Meeting Reschedule Ikodifie
DATE: April 8, 1986 Rej ected.„
Date
Because Memorial Day wi 1 1 be observed on Monday, May 26, it w i l l be
necessary to reschedule the regular Council Meeting.
May.27 or May 29 are acceptable alternatives, Wednesday, May 28 is not.
i E
MEMORANDUM ,ration b
ndorsed,
Modifi ed.,...
TO: City Manager Rej ected...
FROM: City Engineer te
SUBJECT: Ramsey County 1986 Contract Overlay Program
DATE: April 7, 1986
Ll
Ramsey County is proposing to overlay the following roads in Maplewood during
the 1986 construction season:
Beam Avenue, Hazelwood — White Bear Avenue
Larpenteur Avenue, VanDyke — Beebe
Lydia Avenue, .25 miles east of White Bear Avenue — McKnight
The work will consist of milling the pavement adjacent to the curb and
adjusting manholes. A one inch overlay will be applied to the entire
roadway.
This project will not result in any cost to the city.
It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolutions approving
the series of proposed overlay projects.
March 19, 1 986
Ramsey County
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
3377 North Rice Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112
812) 484.9104
Mr. Kenneth Haider
Director of Public Works
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
1986 Contract Bituminous Overlay Project
Divisions of:
Engineering
Maintenance
Mobile Equipment
Environmental Services
Enclosed is a copy of a proposed plan for milling and overlay of bituminous pavements
on the following roadways.
County Road E - Snelling Avenue to Lexington Avenue, S.A.P. 0-615-11
County Road B - Cleveland Avenue to T.H. 51, S.A.P. 62-625-11
County Road B2 - Fairview Avenue to Hamline Avenue, S.A.P. 62- 678 -04
Beam Avenue - Hazelwood Street to White Bear Avenue, .S.A.P. 62- 619 -10
County Road C - Pascal Avenue to Lexington Avenue, S.A.P. 62- 623 -29
Larpenteur Avenue - Van Dyke Street to Beebe Road, S.A.P. 62- 630 -23
Lydia Avenue - .25 mile east of White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road,
S.A.P. 62-619-11
Also accompanying are the engineer's estimate, a sample of city resolution for plan
approval and a no parking restriction.
The total cost of the project is estimated to be $474,384.45. The cost for each
individual roadway is identified in the engineer's estimate.
Ramsey County will be requesting county state aid highway fund reimbursement for
100% of the costs. Pending state aid approval, we anticipate the work wilt be completed
during the 1986 construction season. However, the specifications prohibit the placing
of 2.361 bituminous wear after September 15. The plan calls for manholes and water
gate valves to be raised one inch to accommodate the overlay. The manholes will be
raised by welding steel rings to existing castings. The gate valves will be raised by
installing adjustable risers to existing castings. The work will be done by the contractor
with county state aid highway funds at no cost to the city. The city w i l l continue its
responsibilities for these manholes and water gate valves after construction.
Some of the existing cross sections do not provide driving lanes and parking areas
sufficient to meet state aid standards. Therefore, in order to secure state aid funding
approval, parking will have to be restricted along the route.
V f
Mr. Haider
March 19, 1986
Page 2 of 2
County Board procedure requires municipal concurrence prior to adoption of parkingrestrictionsonitsroadsystem. Therefore, it will be necessary for the city to pass a
resolution requesting the accompanying parking restrictions. The resolution is in
accordance with that shown in the Mn /DOT state aid manual. County Board action
will also be taken as part of the project plan and agreement approval process to meetthesestateaidrequirements.
Kindly review the proposed plan and parking resolution. If the city concurs with the
project, arrange for the appropriate signature on the title sheet and the council
resolutions approving the plans and parking restrictions. When you are ready, we willfurnishtheoriginaltitlesheetforsignature. If you have any further questions, pleasecall.
Wayne .Leonard,
Coor 'sting Engineer
DS /clm
Enclosure
RADATZ .
T 3
R22M, 36!31 R21w
16
t26N UIO
v 19 -
z " L -
DOD LYN AVE.
N
AVE. Ao
4
Q
J
4. MARY LANE
S. LAKEWOOD DR.
i 3t co
O u W Q n
H Y m cr Y AVE.
J
v w N v S ,pNDRIDGE
W
IE ( 2 t,n
N W MAPLE LAN 3 4)
w cr
AYM
W--- -- --- -
o MAPLEVEW AV C ' !
W 70
it
1. MAPLE LANE
FC68 2. CHIPPEWA CIRCLE
nr 3 . CHIPPEWA AVE.
NORTH ST. PAUL
W
14Q
cn KOHLMAN VE.
2W
W E DGE HILL RD.W
Z ; Q
Q J
J LJTu. AVE
W
tS lItn AVE.
65
GERVAIS AVE.
36
OPE AVE.
vs LARK p AVE. ' CL
N
c 2
p Z / Q
LAURIE a RD. x 2
a J Q'
s AVE.
W 54 Q 25
R K L 4 v oc" .)5
h I
W
Q
RIS
E Ir*0OD AVE
i J
MUNICIPALITY OF
MAPLEWOOD
F
ScAu
Soo' 0 1600' 3200'
I
I NORTH ST. PAUL
29
28 6 119 +
o Low AY
d
0
TI RN
cr 47
a
w M O ME4
m Ac W N ; q
P AVE
T- -
J t
Z9 to K!N T N AVE
J
c
i1 , 3 /_1 PRiL;E ZAVE W
a
wl
6) N.LAKEI+M' W OR.
1) ti,MEYER CT.
us sREml000 CURVE
0) E.BRENNER AVE.
j0) N.CHIPPEWA CT.
t ) N.BARTELMY LA
MARY -.CT.
w
J
Q
D
Y
a
0
i 20
z
Wloul
Q
z
3
J1120AVE
t
I
I ;
t
f
0
V
WHEREAS, plans for Project 62-619-11 showing proposed alignment, profiles,
grades and cross- sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County
State -Aid Highway No. 19 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved.
RESOLTUION
Dated this _, day of , 19
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of
C
City of
1 hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of
at a , meeting thereof held in the _ Minnesota, on the
day of 19 ._, as disclosed by the records
of said City in my possession.
Seal)
J s
Ala
r
Nos wooa AVE.
5
M
0 5
12
W
3 = J
AV E Q
T. PAUL
65
S
SCAU
0
68
LE.MARYLAND
31
Q
over
0
Lake °
W rr
sli
21
0
V
z
J
t`
C7
z
Z
urn
Q
W
N
Q
Ry W
vv
MARYLAKE RD.N
c
W '
Trailer Court
tPrivote) E
AVE
K
I RAN JI UM ST.l
ii MA NOLIA AVE. Q
11 Qi
t68d, a
D
Or 30-PLs ^
Z
0
W v Z HARVESTER
AVE
N
W W 1:
W LA. BRAND AVE t4 !t
I.- I RAND hp
a S T.
TM ST t E + T
J D
r Q T29N
r 2530R22W
t3
R21W -
7(0 E MINNEMANA AVE
E ISAARGARET ST.-
1 N
It sir, STIL
Vo
a,{EREwo NT AVE
NORTH ST. PAUL
i 29
ldi NOi- LOW AY [(
r •
i Rk
o ..:.1 F4
ats
R: PLEY AVE
SoNGST - ON1 AV E
PRICE SAVE
ID : 0
L A R P E N T E U R
r
9
i
kvr
Fir1VF • -:
aq
0
V
30
4vE,
IF
IDAMO AVE
W 2
T29NRZZW
oc t4113 p
t
23(24 0
MUNICIPALITY OF
MAPLEWOO
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the Cit y of
Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the
day of , 1986, at .
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COUNTY
TO RESTRICT PARKING ALONG A PORTION OF LARPENTEUR AVENUE
WHEREAS, the County has planned the resurfacing of Larpen teur Avenue
CSAH 30) from Van Dyke Street to Beebe Road; and
WHEREAS, the County w i l l be expending County State Aid Highway funds
S.A.P. 62- 630 -23) on the improvement of said street; and
WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum
standards as previously adopted for such County State Aid streets and that approvaloftheproposedconstructionasaCountyStateAidstreetprojectmust, therefore,
be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions, that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a County State Aid project in
the City, has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City requests the
County to restrict the parking of motor vehicles on the north side of Lar P enteur
Avenue from Van Dyke Street to Hazel Street.
Seconded by Ayes -
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood,Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached -and foregoing extract99ofminutesofaregularmeetingoftheCityofMaplewood.
City Clerk
RESOLTUION
WHEREAS, plans for Project 62- 630 -23 showing proposed alignment, profiles,
grades and cross - sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County
State -Aid Highway No. 30 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved.
Dated this day of _ , 19
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of
City of
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of
at a meeting thereof held in the Minnesota, on the
day of , 19 , as ,disclosed by the records
of said City in my possession.
Seal)
65
WHITE BEAR LAKE
L
f
RA
to N. LAKE OW WL
T) M. MEYER M68Is) ORE irw000 CURVE
0) E. I*CN %E It AVE.
410) ft. C,"lp EwA CT.
1 1) M. "RTZLMY LA.
tit) M. MAPV ET
r •`70
19 Ayr . .
A t')
w OOD LY F
WOODLYN
s
T)
IL . LYDIA
Y W
O 4` cr AV E . o
wtK v .'NOR IpGE
M 5 (2
W IWAPLELAN
3)
A )
JMAV -
MAPLEVi W AV (
1. MAPLE LANE 4. MARY
F 68 2. CHIPPE CIRCLE 5 LAKEF
I S. CNIPPEWA AVE
r
A r
J
4
C EDGE MILL RD.
Q
J
t v Z DEMONT AVEAJ W
BROOK a VE FE m ° _
or BROOKS
i to AVE E. ,
f SEXT T AV
65
Q ERvAS AVE.
co 4NDVIEW
Iy llk .IN DR. 3fi
SHERREN AVE.
AVE OPE AVE. •
SARK AVE i : t LARK c •vE. +- V)
ZJJLAURIFRD .
t LAURIE a RD.
Q _ a 1
NORTH ST. PAUL
pf
MUNICIPALITY OF
25 _ ,, i
L Q
8 , 64 _APLEVVOOD
Q AVE BU > AV
pRIpG AVE S* I
V 'J y
1 0E - AVE W b4 1600 1
0 1600 3200
KILL MA N o AVE _. MAR RIS
ROSE wOOp AVE
S, R Y A N y NORTH ST. PAUL
I ' eoll
y 28 i fib 19
ti o - 6* Lowl Ay
z t N
R W 4 M
O IW TI Rk fy
I
I • s R, oq
7 R PL E Y AVEWoktfla /of
r a
Li }
t ,
a ! t 29 K N T M AVE J
M1A{ ST i W
LOk i 3 _ : 1 __ .
T%.ONR22W
T29 *>
000,-
r o
r
AL
AVE. I W
M
N1
1
W
V'
RA
to N. LAKE OW WL
T) M. MEYER M68Is) ORE irw000 CURVE
0) E. I*CN %E It AVE.
410) ft. C,"lp EwA CT.
1 1) M. "RTZLMY LA.
tit) M. MAPV ET
r •`70
19 Ayr . .
A t')
w OOD LY F
WOODLYN
s
T)
IL . LYDIA
Y W
O 4` cr AV E . o
wtK v .'NOR IpGE
M 5 (2
W IWAPLELAN
3)
A )
JMAV -
MAPLEVi W AV (
1. MAPLE LANE 4. MARY
F 68 2. CHIPPE CIRCLE 5 LAKEF
I S. CNIPPEWA AVE
r
A r
J
4
C EDGE MILL RD.
Q
J
t v Z DEMONT AVEAJ W
BROOK a VE FE m ° _
or BROOKS
i to AVEE. ,
f SEXT T AV
65
Q ERvAS AVE.
co 4NDVIEW
Iy llk .IN DR. 3fi
SHERREN AVE.
AVE OPE AVE. •
SARK AVE i : t LARK c •vE. +- V)
ZJJLAURIFRD .
t LAURIE a RD.
Q _ a 1
NORTH ST. PAUL
pf
MUNICIPALITY OF
25 _ ,, i
L Q
8 , 64 _APLEVVOOD
Q AVE BU > AV
pRIpG AVE S* I
V 'J y
1 0E - AVE W b4 1600 1
0 1600 3200
KILL MA N o AVE _. MAR RIS
ROSE wOOp AVE
S, R Y A N y NORTH ST. PAUL
I ' eoll
y 28 i fib 19
ti o - 6* Lowl Ay
z t N
R W 4 M
O IW TI Rk fy
I
I • s R, oq
7 R PL E Y AVEWoktfla /of
r a
Li }
t ,
a ! t 29 K N T M AVE J
M1A{ ST i W
LOk i 3 _ : 1 __ .
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the
day of , 1986, at .
The following members were present:
The following. members were absent:
Counci (member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COUNTY
TO RESTRICT PARKING ALONG A PORTION OF BEAM AVENUE
WHEREAS, the County has planned the resurfacing of Beam Avenue (CSAH1
19) from Trunk Highway 61 to White Bear Avenue; and
W!- AREAS, the County will be expending County State Aid Highway funds
S*A*P* 62- 619 -10) on the improvement of said street; and
WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum
standards as previously adopted for such County State Aid streets and that approval
of the proposed construction as a County State Aid street project must, therefore,
be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions, that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a County State Aid project in
the City, has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City requests the -
County to restrict the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of Beam Avenue from
Trunk Highway 61 to White Bear Avenue.
Seconded by Ayes -
STATE OF MINNESOTA
1
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract
of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood.
City Clerk
La a
RESOLTUION
WHEREAS, plans for Project 62-619-10 showing proposed alignment, profiles,
grades and cross- sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County
State -Aid Highway No. 19 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved.
Dated this day of , 19 .
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of
4
City of
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of
at a meeting thereof held in the .. Minnesota, on the
day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records
of said City in my possession.
Seal)
T .
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager '
FROM; City Engineer
SUBJECT: White Bear Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
DATE; April 7, 1986
Aotion by Council:
Modified-
Raj
Date
Ram-se is proposing to rehabilitate the sections of White Bear Avenue
not recently reconstructed. Joint and crack repair will be the major
activitv. In addition the old railroad crossing north of Frost Avenue
will be ` replaced with oonorete'pavement~
This work will not result in any cost to the city,
It is recommended the city council adopt the attached resolution approving
the work.
r
March 20, 1986
Ramsey County
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
3377 North Rice Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112
612.) 484.9104
Kenneth G. Haider
City Engineer
City of Maplewood
1902 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
S.A.P. 62- 665 -29
White Bear Avenue
Pavement Rehabilitation
Divisions of:
Engineering
Maintenance
Mobile Equipment
Environmental Services
Enclosed is a copy of a proposed plan, an engineer's estimate, and a sample of City
resolution for plan approval for concrete pavement rehabilitation on White Bear Avenue
between Frost Avenue in Maplewood and T.H. 61 in White Bear Lake.
The estimated cost for this project is $443,484.15 as shown on the attached engineer's
estimate. Ramsey County w i l l be requesting County State Highway Aid fund
reimbursement for 100% of the costs. Pending State Aid office approval, we anticipate
the work to be completed during the 1986 construction season.
Kindly review the proposed plan and, if the City concurs with the project, arrange for
the appropriate signature on the title sheet and a copy of the Council resolution
approving the plans. When you are ready, we will furnish the original title sheet for
your signature. If you have any questions, please contact me.
In a companion project, the County proposes to construct a grade correction at the
old railroad crossing just north of Frost Avenue. Also included will be the construction
of left turn pockets for north bound White Bear Avenue at Monn Avenue and Belland
Avenue. We see these as separate contracts but anticipate submittal for your approval
within the ext two weeks.
Coordinating Engineer
R FP:m
encs.
RESOLTUION
WHEREAS, plans for Project 62- 665 -29 showing proposed alignment, profiles,
grades and cross- sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County
State -Aid Highway No. 65 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved.
Dated this day of 19 .
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of Ramsey
City of Maplewood
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Maplewood at a meeting
thereof held in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on the day of
19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in
my possess ion.
Seal)
I
f
c
t
RESOLTUION
WHEREAS, plans for Project 62- 665 -29 showing proposed alignment, profiles,
grades and cross- sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County
State -Aid Highway No. 65 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved.
Dated this day of 19 .
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of Ramsey
City of Maplewood
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Maplewood at a meeting
thereof held in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on the day of
19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in
my possess ion.
Seal)
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Reconstruction- -City Project 83 -1f
DATE: April 7, 1986
t
Aot'on by Council
Endorsed.,„
Re j ected..
The attached agreement between Ramsey County and Maplewood was
approved by the council and signed by the mayor and city c lerk on May161985. However, since the project had to be reheard this agreement
is not valid. A new agreement needs to be approved and executed. The
new agreement is identical to the attached agreement.
It is recommended that the council authorize execution of this
agreement by the mayor and city clerk by passing the attached
resolution.
c - AMENDED
Agreement No. 85004A
r Frost Avenue, S.A.P. 62- 628 -04
Maplewood
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT by and between the City of Maplewood., Minnesota, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the County of Ramsey, a political
subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County ";
W ITN ESSE TH:
WHEREAS, the City and the County desire to construct and rebuild Frost Avenue
County State Aid Highway 28) from Adele Street to Birmingham Street; and
WHEREAS, this portion of Frost Avenue has been designated by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs from the county
state aid highway funds; and
WHEREAS, this portion of Frost Avenue reconstruction has been designated as
project S.A.P. 62- 628 -04; and
WHEREAS, plans for Frost Avenue Project S.A.P. 62- 628 -04 showing proposed
alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the improvement of County State Aid
Highway 28 within the limits of the City as a county state aid highway project have
been presented to the City; and
WHEREAS, the project includes, in addition to other things, grading, storm sewer,
aggregate base, bituminous base and surfacing, concrete curb and gutters, and City
utility adjustments and /or improvements; and
WHEREAS, the grading provisions require acquisition of certain right of way and
temporary construction and slope easements prior to the construction; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has determined allowable
credit for storm sewer outfall lines previously constructed prior to the project, and
the resulting portion of this storm sewer system estimated to be eligible for county
state aid highway funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The County shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications. and proposals,
take bids, and with concurrence of the City, award a contract for the construction of
this project, S.A.P. 62- 628 -04; the County shall perform the construction inspection.
2. All Frost Avenue rights of way and temporary easements will be in the
name of the County, and parking and other regulations will be controlled by the County.
Any rights of way which cannot be negotiated will be acquired through eminent domain
proceedings and thereafter assigned by the City to the County.
3. The City shall acquire and pay for all rights of way and easements required
for the construction of the project within the City except those on County -owned
property.
Page 1 of 3
J
40 The storm sewer system as shown in the plans and specifications is
estimated to be eligible for 69-%41.73% reimbursement by county state aid highwaygY
funds and this portion shall be paid Yy the County. The City shall pay that portion of
the storm sewer system not eligible for reimbursement from county state aid highway
funds. The portion of the storm sewer cost to be paid by the City is estimated at
b9- %58.27%o
4M - - --
5. The- -city- shalt -pay -M%- ef- -the- -eesl -e€- the- hel -dig- pond- system ,- effusive
of- jApe- -work - hieed -in- -storms- -sewer - eosts; - mAh -of- -the - right- -of -way - at- - 'Statien
M Omitted in Agreement No. 85004A.
6. Upon completion of the project the County shall own and maintain the
storm sewer catch basins
L
and leads and the City shall own and maintain the storm
sewer trunk lines holding pond and laterals servicing property outside the road right of
way.
7. The City shall pay to the County 7596 of the cost of concrete curb and
gutters constructed within the City except for medians, replacement of. existing concrete
curb and gutters and. the portion on the north side of Frost Avenue along Flieek Park
between Adele Street and Frank Street.
8. The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of the City water
main extension at Atlantic Street. Upon completion of the water main improvement
the operation and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the City.
90 Any existing City utilities modified or adjusted which are necessitated by
the construction, as shown in the plans and specifications, shall be paid for by the
County when eligible through its county state aid highways funds.
10. Inspection charges by the City's water supplier, City of Saint Paul Board
of Water Commissioners, shall be paid for by the City.
11. Any City utility or facility improvements to those provisions presently
imade n the plans and specifications may be incorporated in the construction contract
by supplemental agreement and shall be paid for as specified in the supplemental
agreement.
12. The City shall not assess or otherwise recover any portion of its costs
for'this project through levy on County -owned . pro ertP Y
13. The City shall pay 5% of its share of the construction cost, as determined
by the contract as awarded, to the County as a preliminary engineering fee. This fee
shall be due upon award of the construction contract.
14. The City shall pay 5% of its share of the construction cost, as determined
by the final contract amounts, to the County as a construction engineering fee. This
fee shall be due upon notification to the City of the final amounts paid to the contractor.
150 The County shall prepare the partial payment estimates, approved by the
Project construction engineer, and notify the City of its share of the costs for the
City's items of work. The City shall pay its share of the cost to the Treasurer of
Ramsey County within fourteen calendar days, and the contractor shall then be paid
by the County.
Page 2 of 3
A/
16. The City shall pay to the Count all additional remaining costs for itsyg
share of the work , upon notification by the County of the final amounts paid to the
contractor.
17. Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and
specifications are hereby in all things approved.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed.
CITY MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
BY
omits
By w
Its
Date
THE COU Y O RA EY
By
Ch rman
B f County Co 'ssioner
l /
Attest G Q.
Chief Q erk- ounty Board fig',
Date
Approved:
Assistant County Attorney
Recommended for Approval:
Director of Public Works and
County Engineer
1-/-2-8j8 Rev. Page 3 of 3
RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the city council has previously approved plans and
specifications for Frost Avenue Reconstruction (Adele to Birmingham),
Project No. 83 -1; and
WHEREAS, an agreement has.been prepared defining project
responsibilities between the City of Maplewood and Ramsey County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
The agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby approved. The mayor and city manager are hereby
authorized and instructed to execute said agreement.
1
MEMORANDUM
Y
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Hazelwood Avenue Reconstruction
Avenue) City Project 85 -27
DATE: April 4, 1986
y
Actio by council..,:,
ndorsed....
Modified,.,,.,,, - . ..
Rej eted,,
Date ..,
County Road'C"TU Beam
Attached is the feasibility report for the above -named project. This
report was ordered by the council due to the deteriorated state of the
existing road surface and increasing traff is demands in the area. The
estimated project cost is $636,460, of which $575,116 is projected to
be recovered through assessments and state -aid funding. The remaining
61,344 is recommended as city participation. This amount is equal to
the proposed assessment against the park property north of the HRI
property (formerly Hazelwood School)*
It is recommended that the council accept this report and order a
public hearing for April 28, 1986 at 7:10 p.m. by passing the attached
resolution. If the hearing is ordered, the engineering staff will be
holding a public information meeting at the Hazelwood Fire Station on
April 24 from 3 to 6 p.m. for all interested property owners.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the. City .of Maplewood has been
authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the
improvement of Hazelwood Avenue from County Road C to Beam Avenue by
construction of street, storm sewer, bituminous path and. utility
se- rvices, and
WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report
for the improvement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
10 The report of the city engineer advising this council that
the proposed improvement on Hazelwood Avenue from County
Road C to Beam Avenue by construction of street, storm
sewer, bituminous path and utility services is feasible and
should best be made as proposed, is hereby received.
2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $636,460.
3. A public hearing will be .held in the council chambers of the
city hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 28th day of
April, 1986, at 7:10 p.m. to consider said improvement.
The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of
said hearing and improvement as _required by law.
Anti on by Council:
MEMORANDUM Endorsed
Modified,
TO: City Managerer Rejeoto
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Date
SUBJECT: McKnight Road Reconstruction -- Phase I (Beaver Lake to
Larpenteur Avenue) City Project 81 -20
DATE: April 4, 1986
Attached is the feasibility report for the above -named project. This
report was ordered on a request by Ramsey County to review preliminary
plans, The estimated project cost is $2,302,986, of whi.ch Ramsey
County is estimated to assume $1,756,130. The remaining $546,856 is
projected to be recovered through assessments and city participation.
It is recommended that the council accept this report and order a
public hearing for April 28, 1986 at 7 p.m. by passing the attached
resolution. If the hearing is ordered, the engineering staff will be
holding a public information meeting at the East County Line #1 Fire
Station on April 23 from 2 to 6 p.m. for all interested property
owners.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been
authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the
improvement of McKnight Road from Beaver Lake to Larpenteur Avenue byconstructionofstreet, storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer,bituminous path and concrete sidewalk, and
WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid reportfortheimprovementhereindescribed:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEW0O D,
MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that
the proposed improvement on McKnight Road from Beaver Lake
to Larpenteur Avenue by construction of street, storm sewer,
water main, sanitary sewer, bituminous path and concrete
sidewalk is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is
hereby received.
2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $2,,302,,986,,
3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the
city hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 28th day of
April, 1986, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The
city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said
hearing and improvement as required by law.