The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989 08-28 & 08-31 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monda Au 28, 1989 and 4:30 P.M., Thursda Au 31, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Buildin Me'etin No. 89-19 A. CALL TO ORDER B* ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES D* APPROVAL OF AGENDA E* CONSENT AGE1,1DA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Bud Transfer - Computer Cablin 3. Final Pa - Project 89-14, Bituminous Resurfacin 4. Bud Chan for Donated Vehicle 5. Bud Chan for Nature Center 6. Bud Chan Nature Center, Additional Hours-Part Time Emplo PUBLIC HEARINGS 1* 7 :00 P*Mos Tax-Exempt Financin n Maplewood Care Center (1905 Cope Avenue) Go AWARD OF BIDS 1. Count Road C- -Keller Parkwa Water, Pro 88-10 H* UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Preliminar Plat Revision: Woods and Ponds 2. Preliminar Plat: Hillwood Oaks No. 2 (Hennen) 3. Code Amendment: Plannin Commission Procedure (2nd Readin 4. L 4 .L q uor License Ordinance (2nd Reading) I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Decision Resources 2. Environmental Protection Ordinance (1st Readin 3. Development Moratorium 4. Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87-32 - Reschedule Public Hearin 5. Count Road C, T.H. 61 - Hazelwood, Pro 89-04, Schedule Hearin 6. Larpenteur, I-35E - Ed Project 86-27, Schedule Hearin 7. Walter Street, Project 84-14, Chan Order No. 1 8. Sexual Harassment Policy--.- 9. Group Insurance Covera 10. Affirmative Action Plan J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS K COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 10 2* 3 * 49 59 6e 7* 81 90 100 Lo ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Adjourn to Closed Session to Discuss Labor Ne and Upcomin Arbitration 20 3* 40 0 M* ADJOURNMENT OF AUGUST 31, 1959 MEETING Agenda Number E -1 A action by Council: GENDA REPORT Endorsed_.._._ Modif i ecl.,�,..�.___... TO: City Manager Red -- -°-- -- Dat ..,.............. FROM. Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: August 21, 1989 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 623 $ 151,084.76 $ 774,295.77 Checks #4653 #4723 Dated 08 -01 -89 thru 08 -17 -89 Checks #1802 - #1931 Dated 08 -28 -89 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 173,128.49 Payroll Checks $ 33,117.27 Payroll Deductions $ 206,245.76 Total Payroll $ 980,541.53 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF : kaz 1 .. _ r... _.n. _...e --- . .M!rm ;';'. -rxrl aTra'e+ r . ,rc. naw _m ViN% .m.. +nua a:.RI `�t:v.Lr'w''•2wNC.`:.Ftl sQ{,C` 'Aw4"J^A'�a111iii."Y�' T• ttv'na ... . a 4 i i , VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEW PAGE 1 _. 08/21 13 : 36 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 08 �. VOUCHER/ 3� CHECK - VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 5I . J NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIP - C10N AMOUNT AMOUNT , 465; 080400 08/01/89 . GROSS BLUE SHIELD _.. _ HEALTH LIFE DENT INS .._ HCMA DED PA Y ....... _... 1988...97 _... _...._ .. _.......... __._.._..__... �� 'y IN's C U NT CO N 1,949'.0 74,E . 92 a 642. 4 9 s,A 4654 120500 08/01/89 GROUP HEALTH INC. HCMA DED PAY 19872.66 1 14 HEALTH LIFE DENT 7,679 . 14 , , INS C:ONT 534.65 10 ' j 0 8 6 s ; 4.655 810100 08/01/89 SHARE HCMA DED PAY 1 , HEALTH LIFE DEiVT 2 i1 m; INS CONT 285. 3 -465 501400 Ou / I 89 - . MADISON . NATIONAL LIFE LOT D INS 1 4657 660800 08/01/8' NORTH ST..PAUL CITY OF �._....:.._._.... _......_. _ _.__._ _..,M ..._..... UTILTIES s 1,�74.� - -..._ ___ ._._ _. -_. ___._.. .___..... _._..._ _ _._.. _ _ _ - 8 850600 08/01/89 SUPERAMER ICA FUEL. 01 L. 99.68 99.68 4659 _ ....., 541 ...,.... -.. MINNS STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LIC FEES 16 16 ' 4660 541400 08/01/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER .._ _ -__ ._ . _ , _ ST- DRI V LIC FEES 88.03 788. s� 4 6 6 742750 48/02/89 �, RACHk::E , RICHARD WAGES TEMP. 7 • 8 2 7• ISb! . .' 4662 541400 08102/89'' MI NN X . STATE TREASURER _ MOTOR VEH LIC. 1 . 75 ._Y...r_ — - 7 5 .._. ; _..._ ;4II i 4663 541404 08/OZ/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 619.54 i 3 4664 140400 08 /03/89 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC, FEES '' 11.44 181M00 40 41 , 4665 541400'' 48/08/89 MINN,' STATE TREASURER STATE ARIVERS_ LI.C.w- 409. R. D0....._-_......_--. .__._._._,...._._. ^.._.�D�.4O {{ 4666 541400 08/08/89 MI IAN . STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L 10 • 9, ! ` i ., 4667 510100 08/03/89 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN. UMPIRES 5 1 466.50 5 466 «50 4668 780475-' -_ .. 08/03/89*' _ SAFETY SYSTk M5 I NC . TRAVEL' TRAIN _. _ _ _ _ . .. ......... I15 00 . TRAVEL. TRAINING 115.00 254 -; M 00 4.66 X61100 08/44/89 FIRST 'MI.NNESOTA ___ _ F x,C.A _ 7 F »I.G.A. 19,715.67 FICA CONTRIBUTION - 34 4670 722ZOO 08/04/89 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERA DEDUCT ION .y � .� , 1 75 • 5•.., PERA CONTRIBUTION 11. 9 ? 95 21 161' �8 7E;j 5 467 560100 48/04/89 MN STATE COMMISSIONER STATE INCOME 7, 850.12 7 1 850,12 y d .U3 7t � 46 72 021700 08/04/89 AMOCO OIL CON FUEL OIL 3077 L 74 t < 467 51c��u0 " ' " t� /t��}/ I�AF` -E DEAF OFFICIALS ASSN A SSNS `YOUTH UMPi�E� 1,045 75 is VOUCHREC CITY OF MAP'k - EwOOD .PAGE 2 08/21/89 13 :36 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER . _.. ....._ .. _....._. _. FOR P E R I O 68 ! 3 VOUCHER/ 4 CHECK VENDOR _ _ CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 r,' 8 YOUTH UMPIRES87. 1 432 . D0 4 ,n 4675 190400 08/04/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE 164.00 4676 770310 08/04/89 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE TRAVEL TRAINING 120.00 120.00 16 4` 77 MI6 I 1S P1 M�_LE1 I�t. __ N 'E NAT I�AL TRAVEL TRALhtIhlG 138400 138.00 4678 151200 08/04/89 DANNER INC» CONTRACT PYM. ,o ,' 15. 9 48,215.49 7, ,,- 4679 181200 08/04/89 DANNER INC. CONTRACT PYM. 114 114,164.38 231 24 _�..___.. ._._.__ ._........._ ___. _ _..._. _ .. _ C _.__. 6 3 4 0 0 3 4 0 0 4 5 5 4IS NhT» SfiA 'E TREASURER _ _ TA 'E DR IiiERS � L I C .1 » ��5 �2G 127 08 /04/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L I C r �s 4681 541 400 10 402 10402 ....... .... 29 `;.3; 4682 541400 00/ MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC. 9 99851.00 30 o , 32 $ 4 - 0 - 131 - 07/19 1� 1V ■ fi �i.�` `,.._.' E �t l� R 51 rl 1 C D - RIVER L I C . 8 . t t� 33 35 f , 46£ 5 840225 08!07/89 ST CRO LX BO PA CKE T CO PR SUPPLIES..... -_._ . __.. :... v..._..__ ............:u......_. 650,50 650._50 36 37 4686 450120 08/08/89 L.M.C.I.T» INSURANCE 42 42,339.00 se 39 "'f)I 40 2 :439,s 2 , 39' i 4 11 4 14 4, 42 ` 43 4639 541400 08/09/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC. _ 1 »9 10 875 44 45 s 4s 4690 541400 08/09/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 768.00 768.00 47 48 T$ �4My'IO15..Y.ANDEIQIAC�I..E _- SUFPLIES ANITtI#IAL 4.65 4s !� SUPPLIES ANGE 2.65 50 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.01 52 __ _____ ' PROGRAM` SUPP LIES 21 . o 3 l TRAVEL TRAINING 4.00 40.65 55 � 1 T _ � .� D T CT U t T C 1� Y DRIVERS L 11.2 0 112.0 0 57 58 `i9 4693 541400 08/10/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEW LIC 12,646.32 1 2 t 646.32 so ; 4694 541400 08/10/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRI'EHS LIC. 432.00 432.00 63 1 4R� 60 09 71 X1 BEN�`_I.T. P` . A : N .__. _._. DEPOa I TS 1 1 000 00 f 00.00 f•5 67 4696 541400 08/11/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH L C FEES 13 13 Fa 69 k3; 4697 541400 08/11 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 708.00 708.00 70 72 �,; 4t98 1400 1 /89 OEIT Q►E NA�' URAL, RESOURSES DtR LI C FEES 120.00 120.00 73 5 I..IPPL I Es 6 n r+ n S UPPLY, r_+ n F F � C E 51 » 4 �"� - 7s 46 ., 515 7 5 __ 08/11/89 � Y � T E M � I N C. .� ' __.. - _.. .._...- .. ._.. _. _.__ .._...___._ ....__._......- ...�..�..._ I VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 �i �� . �� /6 08/x:1 /89 13. _6 FOR PER I O D VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER � - ._ . . _ 0 8 21 31 VOUCHER/ 1111.- __�..�.__._.... 4I C:HECK V ENDO R CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT (b e 1 1 _ 1111.._ _ 11 _ 1.. _1._ -.11....__ 11.11.._...._ ........._ . 1 1.._ _.11_..- 111 . 1. �� . 34 E SUPPLIES OFFICE 4�` ,�. SUPPLIES OFFICE 35.28 515►.0 I „{ y _ __..____ __ __ - -- _._ 1111._ ._ _�.�`__w__ ._-- 111:1- _..._..___ ___ _.� - ,i _ -__ .. 1111.._ 1111_. __ -. _ _ - ._ _ -_ .__ ...............____..___._ .._..._...________....._...__.. _ 1111. ___ - . 10 1111.. _51 1600 � - t�$ % 1 _ MASYS G�►RP E0UIPM.ENT' OTHER 3, 050.00 3,1050.00 'tai I } gal (121 4701 511600 08/11/89 MASYS CORP EQUIPMENT OTHER _ ----- 1111 ._ 171 1� ,.,1 4, 550.00 4, 550 .0V 4702 511600 08/11/89 MASYS CORP EQUIPMENT OTHER _ _ TRAVEL TRAIN 1 1 I, {i __ 1111_ - - _- 1111__ 551300 0 /14/8 MN PA SUPERVI A 80C. I i .111 181 4706 761 100 08/14/8 RO - SO CONTRACTING, INC. AWARDED CONST CTR 1 :� 551 . 89 19,551. 2ul '� � .. -.. . _ _ . _ 1111 _ ..- _.....,y- ., . _ . .._ ..._..._._ _ 1111__ - -- - ._ _ -1111 .- -.. _ . _� 1111. _ _�_.__ _ ._._..._.._...__._.__�...._.... 1111 _ ._ __ - ... _ -.. 1111 . - _ . _ �..,��.._._..._._..._...._._. 4707 430750 0$/15/8 KOHLMAN STELLA AMB 904585+ 31.1.x.. " _ 1111 Iltr_ 1111 4708" _-:: 15C1 0 .t -% 15/ COMERC I AL LIFE I N S U kANCE INC. LIFE I RAY 99.32 13 HCMA DED PAY 326.20 1 2,4 HEALTH LIFE D E N T A r �T.r _ . _ _ 7 3 4 ___._... 1111.._ ........_m.. _ ........,.... _ �.....- 1111.._ _....... ._.- .. -._. ., _ .. 1111 _ 1111 . , . , 1111- ,. _ _._ . _ _ _ 1111._. _.. �_ 12; A/R INS GONT 30,04 1 IZti I,> 4709' 541400 08 /15/89 MINN STATE TREASURER MTR VEH L I C FEES 1 0 , Z6 10, Z 2i 11-11 __ ._._....___.._ -.._ - __._.. _.__..._ �.. ..,._.._._._...,.�._......_..._ ..�... _._ ._ i s zy 4710 541400 08/15/89 MINN. STATE TRE ST DRIV LIC FEES 808.00 808.00 JO .. . . . . . .. .. '. . _ ...,.,.�.... 1111 . __....... _. 1 111_. 1111. - _,. ..-- .- �....... ,..� .... .........._._....Y_._� 1111 -.. 1 31 471 1 7150 REiST`AD RESOURCES, ..INC DES' FtiAYALLE 1.0 000.0? 13 GEN COVT ID FEES 6, 1Z0,00 3 _..__�... 1111 ...___._.. i �� 4 5 08/15/8 M ILAN. G.F. A. TRAV -& ' FRAIN 9.00 � TRAVEL & TRAIN 9.00 15.00: .......... !3 4T13 _ '--' 541400' 1111. 08% 15/ 8'7 -. MI NN. STATE T MTR . VEH L IC FEES 8 8,770.$5 ,'v' 4714 541400 08/15/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LTC FEES 867.50 867.50 _..........,.....___._:_.__..- ._.__. ___ _..._.._._____.....__..__�.._.. -- _. - au! 4715 541400 08/16/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MT VEH L IC FEE$ 9 9, 614.42 1 4,d 471r _ .. T V L I C +�7 0 6 541400 08/14, MI NN. STATE TRE ASURER S D R IV FE S _ 6. 676.00 Al 4717 510100 08/1 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN FEES FOR SERVICE � ,.;.,. .........�..._....__ - __,- _._..�..__._.._- 1111.., 1111._ ._ ..__.._....... .....__.. R._ __......_....._... ,.. .......__... _. _ ......... _........... 1111 1111 _...__.._�_..__...__..... _....,.._..�...._. ,_ . . ii...._..... _ -. _.. ....� ... .. 1111 1111 .. -1111 _ _ ... ......... ._..._.._..._ ......... -..- ._........_:._.......... 1111. .- 1111 -. .. _ ,... .. ,......... -_.. 11,11 ......... _. .. ._......... 1111 .. .. 1111 1111 1111 ....._.. .. - _ It 4718 7 20600 08 / 16/0:-+ POST POSTA 1 , :�.,0 .00 1 � r - ,_ .. ,., .. r. � .t. N ,� 5 471' 661750 08/16/89 NORTHERN STATES POWER UT Z62 1 .... LI WOOD '� c� � ' obi UTIL 25OZ LONDIN 3.90 i i; UT1L 200 ODAY _.. _.v 1111 _. 7 ........ .�_......__.._,___ _ _._ _ _ �... _ ........ _ _..___...._.___ _.... 1111_ ... -1111 - _ . - - . 5 _._ 1111 _. . _ 1:111 � . �n uTZ 54 ' UT' 1L 63 STERLING 6.37 fu UTIL 2100 LARD 91.60 r4• 111 UTIL 1401 GER 1 X31 U TIL ;2 146 ARCADE 4 * 5 UTIL 741 LARP 14.71 _ �. zf 1 :.,:. _- ....._.__ _.. _.. .. _...:...Y_ . 1111. _. _ . . -. _ ._ .._ - . .T_..... 1111 _....._... _ No VOUCHREG 08/21/89 13:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR 0 H Et K NUMBER NUMBER DATE I e-O'S 05T [31 ACE' 4720 722200 08/11/99 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERA DEDUCTION PBL. 91334.94 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 5.07 1806 16 .14 ANDERSON, Ut�.MENTINA PERA CONIRIBUTIONS 12,133o71 21,468 .65 MAINTENANCE 4T21 140400 08/11/89 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNT Y DRIVERS LICs - 148.50 148.50 SUPPLIES 20.46 4722 541400 08/17/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LICe 13 13,688.85 MAINTENANCE 4723 '54'1400* '08 /1 T/ 8 9 'MINN''- STATE 'TREASUArIlk' STATE DRIVERS LICi 420.50 420.50 1802 010465 08/28/89 A.T. T. COMMUNICATIONS A/R MISC i IP: 1809 070200 08/31/89 BECKER, RONALD UNIFORMS CLOTHING 239-80 TnspRolq� 135.59 1810 070300 08/28/89 BEHM LOIS PROGRAM SUPPLIES TELEPHONE 2.40 139.11 I e-O'S 05T [31 ACE' M A IN TE-N AIN 't--'- ... ... . .... ------- 14.22 08/28/89 MAINTENANCE 7.06 37,50 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 5.07 1806 16 .14 ANDERSON, Ut�.MENTINA MAINTENANCE 4.51 48.00 MAINTENANCE 180-7 040700 MAINTENANCE 67.53 K-9 CARE MAINTENANCE 152.99 SUPPLIES 20.46 08/31/89 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE 40,17 58.26 MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE 71.14 1804 010600 08/31/89 ACRD MINNESOTA SUPPLIES OFFICE 45.67 SUPPLIES OFFICE 5.97 51.64 1805 021200 08/28/89 AMERICAN FASTENER ------------ SUPPLIES VEHICLE 37,50 37.50 1806 08/293/189 ANDERSON, Ut�.MENTINA PROGRAM REG FEES 48.00 ..... .... . .......... 48.00 180-7 040700 08/31/89 ARDEN SHOREVIEW HOSPITAL K-9 CARE 168.30 168.30 1808 061900 08/31/89 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 58.26 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 108.11 SUPPLIES 'VEHICLE 156.41 322.78 i IP: 1809 070200 08/31/89 BECKER, RONALD UNIFORMS CLOTHING 239-80 239.80 1810 070300 08/28/89 BEHM LOIS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 41,69 .41 .-69 . ..... opuzs/mam 5v tERTHIAUME�, KIM VEH ICLE AL I.. OW A N C L E 62.14 62.14 1812 080300 08/31/89 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY SUPPLIES PHOTO 5.48 PHOT SO P PL 1 103.72 109.20 1813 080900 08/31/89 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OTHER CONSTRUCTION 297.00 i VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE.WOOD PACE 5 08 /2 1/89 13:36 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER. - _ FOR - .._•. PERIOD 08 11 I VOUCHER! _.. _._. _...._....._ _..._- ....._.... _ :._--- _._...._ ._.. _.._._ _.....__._........w:..__.....__ _.. __ .... . .....__._.. _.___ _ ----- _. i�� CHECK _ - VENDOR ...._.. __ CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 1 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT `7 UTILITIES 56.76 9 1 UTILITIES 31.56 ,,t UTILITIES _ 10 .80 � UTIL 13.20 11 10 UTILITIES 12.12 1; 1 ,? , ._..__ . - ._... _..._- _ . - _ _ _ _. _ ... _ _..._ ....... _ _ .. _ _ . _ ... UTILITIES _ .... _ . ............ __ ...... _._... _......_ ..... _ .._ 336.12 _ ... _ . _.. 757. __. _.... _ - - 13 1 : 1 1 1814 090575 08128/89 BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES OUTSIDE. ENG FEES 150.00 150.00 i81 , - �1U ,�� 115 0'1450 08/:1/89 BROWNING - FERRIS IND. FEES FOR SERVICE 304.50 304.50 � i« 1816 101400 08/31/89 BUILDERS SQUARE MAINTENANCE. MA I NT ' MATERIAL 42.72 150090 58.62 1817 101950 08/Z8/89 BYERLYS PROGRAM SUPPL ES 4 .ZZ 14.22 a z3, Isis 110390 08/28/89 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP C OMPANY SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE 6.10 9 15.20 31 ' 24' - -- - - -- ._ ._.._._ i.S.SI �6 1819 130900 08/Z8/89 CHILTON ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FEES FOR SERVICE 2$.12 1 zs _ - -- _ _ . 1520 __ -. __ _ .- _ _. __� ___. _ __ 140w05 t8/ - 3%9 �_ _.__..._ .- ..._......__._._- . ... _ Cl� - EwAN STEP RUGS - ._____ _ _ _ _ -- _• - - -_ _. __� .___.. _w._ _. -- - - -_ RUG CLEANING 13. zs RUG CLEANING 12 .35 Z5,70 q 301 31 .........- .,_._.... 1821 _.._..._15100_... 08/3 1/89 CONNELLY INDUST EL REPAIR MAIN uT IL.ITY 89.25 89125 ,y'i 3z, 1a:s1 33 1822 151800 08/31/89 CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER MAINTENANCE 210.87 {a = 341 TAX 11.8 146, TAX , 9 - 19 301 _ .. 18� _.. 152500 _ 08/28/89 - CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS, INC9 FEE F"OR ,'�E.RVICE _155,000 155,00 138 { 1824 160750 08/Z8/89 COUNTS MEDICAL . EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 19.63 19463 1525 180900 08/31/89 AAL.EY , PAT CONTRACT PYM. 495.00 498.00 j•i tl 1826 181300 - . 08 /ZS /8'9 DATA DISPATCH FEES FOR SERVICE _ . 2U .00 ':.,... SUPPLIES 25.00 45.00 1827 1 08/ ci /89 DEMCO PROGRAM SUPPLIES 18v 18.40 16 1828 200300 08/31/89 /89 DICTAPHONE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT Z 21 900.00 . bo 1829 230700 08/31/89 EAST SIDE G.T.C. SUPPLIES VEH. .. 6.93 i�3il url SUPPLIES VEHICLE: 13186 20 .79. 68 U1 . ...... ... ... .......... . ... 6b too 53 1830 250050 08/31/89 ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION CO LAND IMPROVEMENT 259.07 54 LAND I 17,254614 :» LAND IMPROVEMENT ZS, 199 40, 712.9 i ' ,; 1831 250300 08/28/89 EULLS MFG;., CO. 9 INC. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 150 «00 1 5040 �rc� VOUGHRtG C ITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 0S' /Z1 /�sq 13.36 VO UCH ER /CHEC REGISTER 8 r..� FOR PERIOD C$ 2 : 3 VOUCHER/ 14 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR. ITEM ITEM CHECK 5 s NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7 r 8 15 2 61 0 08 / 1 /89 FIRST 7RUS`t P'AY I KN6 AGENT'S FEES 1 , 161 , 55 1 , 161 .55 oi 1333 270250 08/28/89 FLEET TECH SERVICE CORP. REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 446.97 112) REPAIR MA I NT VEHICLE 276.71 723.68 11 ,4 15 1334 280440 08/Z8/89 FORTMEYER LANG PRINTERS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 61.50 ,s _ .... P_ RO GRAM .._ SUPPL.I E 65.00 ,r P RO GRAM S 40 PROGRAM SUPPL.I ES 40.00 201 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 45.00 1 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 40.00 PROGRAM SUPPLIES ZZ .00 11 PROGRAM SUPPLI 26,00 25 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 32.00 27 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 18.00 389.50 28 29 1535 280451 08/31/89 FOSS, JAN HONORANIUM 60 .00 60.00 �° 32 j--- ___- _._._._._,_...... __ . _..___ , mss . - --_ - - __.. __. _...__ ....._..- -- -- • - -- -- - ._.._.._ ._._....._.. ..� ._........ _ "mow � %' _ _ ERV GEW llNIF RM , 19.4 33 UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.42 35 UNIFORMS 19.47 36 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 45.42 37 UNIFORMS 19.47 38 39 ;o. UNIFORMS CLOTH 45,42 40 UNIFORMS 1. .4T 41 UNIFORMS : CLOTH 45,42 42 43 UNIFORMS 67.86 44 UNIF ORMS CL 34.3+ 45 UNIFORMS 54.61 46 47 UNIFORMS CLOTH 37.3 48 UNIFORMS 57. 49 r UNIFORMS. CLOTH 36.64 5 UNIFORMS 56.11 52 UNIFORMS . CLOTH 34.39 53 r UNIFORMS CLOTH 18 55 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 18.54 56 UNIFORMS CLOTH 18.54 57 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 18,54 71.45 58 59 i . .... . Pi w._. _:._.-- -.._....._........_.__...._�_ 00ek60 0/8'9 G.A. C. PUS INESS SERVICE JUDGEMENTS & LOSSES 3 . 1� 3 61 • 62 ;Ire 63 1838 30Z420 08 GERHOLTZ, JIM FEES FOR SERVICE 75.00 75 , 00 64 it i! M - 183 302600 08/31/89 GLADS`fONE LUMBER MART SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 11.26 1f`.�� 6s ' 68 3 �+� ........ LSD GLENiiii:fD 1NGLEi��ii�D I+►IATER CGL�LER ��+ .75 6'� .75 69 1840 70 1841 310650 08/28/89 GOPHER DISPOSAL FEES FOR SERVICE 6 6 72 73 1842 310715 08/28/89 GOPHER STATE -ONE CALL, INC. FEES FOR SERVICE 77 .50 7T .50 ;4 76 ► VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE.WOOD PAGE 7 08 / 21 / 89 ' 13 : 3�.� ''' VOUCi-iERlCf-lECirti REGISTER FOR. PE RIOD 0 {3 VOUCHER / CHECK VENDOR - __ - CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK s NUM$ER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7, r 154,E 320 00 r � DB /. 1IO�+ . GRACE, DUANE CONTRACT 495.00 49 5.00 91 9 1844 3Z0 3Z5 08/31/89 GREW-HAYMAN, JANET VEHICLE ALLOWAN _..___.__..___.___......__.._.. - . -- -_. 1 4.Z7 1z, fu PROGRA 4.13 18.40 I� 4 , 1845 340050 08/31/89 HEALTH RESOURSES MEMBERSHIP .3 57 ,�2 . MEMBERSHIP 14 MEMBERSHIP 14.33 I, MEMBERSHIP 57 . 3 2 ; L U � M 57 ._3.2_ „ MEMBERSHIP 57.32 ia4 MEMBERSHIP 109.82 367.76 b j 184b 340110 08/Z8/89 HEJNY RENTALS, INC OUTSIDE RENTAL 65.00 6 5. 1 0 0 � 1847 340408 /8 /kS HELGEaON 1 ALLENE PROGRAM REG FEES 2 0 - 0 26.00 zy s� IA, 11 1848 350500 08/28/89 HI LLCREST GLASS SUPPLIES JANITOR _ _ 15.00 - -- - - -- -_ - 15.00 -- - -__ 'z 6 1849 35 1300 08/31/89 HORSNELL, JUDITH VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 9.88 PR 7 4. z 1 7» 1 �u I 1854 351400 08/31 HORWATH TOM � CONTRACT PYM. 900. 900 �0 � . �3�{ j .io, 14 ;.:,;.. . ........... 1851 370 1 00 _ . D8 /89 HUTCHINSON, . ANN T PROGRAM SUPPLI ES ..• ...... _ __- ._,.._.. _ ._ -- --- -___ - - -- io PROGRAM SUPPLIES 9.00 CONTRACT PYMO 4.�. 1 9.20 i. ;�' .. .. _ ... - - __ . _. _ , __ _ _ _ - . _ . _... _ _.. _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ .._ _ . _ -_ _ _ _._.._. _ _...__....._ _ _._._ .�...__...._._. _. , ...___ _ _ 1852 370125 08/31/89 HUTCHIN ON, KENNETH PROGRAM REGISTRATION 15.00 15.00 1411 1853 400810 - 08/28/89 JANSEN, _ VEHICLE AL.L.'OWANCE...- 26,3 ' ;., 1854 401555 08/28/89 JOHNSON BROS. WELL DRILLING OTHER CONST COSTS 6 461 *04 f� 41 . 00 41 1 1855 41 250 08/31/89 K MART PROGRAM 19.92 19.92 �J ;•, 185 6 ELECTRIC INC* REPAIR 432 _ _ bl'i 1857 430300 0818/89' KNOWLAN ` S PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6.1 P_ G M R - S UP PL I E - S- ._.._...__. _..__.____ ..___._.__ .._.-.__....__._.._.__.._._.... R O . _A 18.3 2 4 .4 8 185.8 430400 08/31/89 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT MAINTENANCE 13.06 13 m 06 a ; F } + ... I .. ..... .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. ...... ... ._ .., .. ...,.. - _ ...... ... .... . .. .... . -. .... .. .. _.. .. ..... .. .... _.... .. ...,. ... ,... ... .._.. - , - - ._ .. _ I I Ian 1859 430600 08/28/89 KOKESH ATHLETIC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13306 133.6 18 0 440200 08/28/89 KREBS ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES VEHICLE 462 .13 462. -GJ 5:1 / ' I 1861 450120 08/31 /89 L.. M. C. I ■T r I N SU RANCE S 3 1 965.00 3 10 1862 460800 08 /28/8 9 LEONARD MICHAEL PROGRAM REG FEES 22 5.00 295 .00 1741 r� V VOUCHREG C CITY O OF MAPLEWOOD P PAGE 8 0 08/21/89 1 13: V VOUCHER/CHECK R REGISTER ' F FOR P PERIOD 08 : I VOUCHER/ CHECK V VENDOR C CHECK V VENDOR I ITEM I ITEM C CHECK NUMBER N NUMBER D DATE N NAME D DESCRIPTION A AMOUNT A AMOUNT MEMUER'S 8 8.04 ` `00 1864 4 490200 4 48/31/89 L LUGER LUMBER CO. M MAINTENANCE { . { . - - O OTHER G O N S 7 R U C �t I U N ... _ . _ . .. 1 � _ f Lill VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RAGE 9 � 1 _ 08/2 1:x:36 08/28/89 RAMS'EY EMERG. MEDICAL SERVICES VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 208. ty 1898 742775 08/31/89 RASMUSSEN, -KAREN F PERIOD. 08 5.00 5.00 l 8 + + 761200 08f31l8�� RUAI1_ . RE�'CUE E U - - O_TH .Hr _ -_° 375.03 1 161 10 3 VOUCHER/ EQUIPMENT OTHER 372.02 141 4 __ __�.._.. _ .._- ....__ CHECK __._ _ VEIdDC�R _... GHE.CK _.._:. ._.._ VENDOR I TEI -� ._. _ ..._..._ ITEM _ CHECK 1 �! 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT s - T 6 ,i 1882 E�60�300 08/28/89 NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF _ UTILTI Ems, _- ......- ....__......... 176..60 of 8 6 UTILTIES 128.1.0 304.70 lu >>) 1883 661800 08/28/89 __. _.. -. -- ------------- NORTHLAND IDENT - _........_ . SUPPLIES JANITOR 34..00 34.00 14 I15 l ,i 1884 662600 08/31/89 NORWEST INVESTMENTS SERVICES PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 5 036.56 5,036.56 }c , �... 1903 7 08/31 SCHWARTZ, PA I PROGR REGISTRATION 5.00 5.00 7<', 14� 188 670500 08/28/89 N UTES O N, LAVE'RNE TRAVEL TRAINI 232. 232.38 i1 l,6f __.- ___.____.__.__..._. SS6 ra4� - 4 acs /2 /S� GLGahI GEC+FF VEHICLE ALLt�WAhiCE 89 ru 28.86 18� ,......_ 1887 _- - _ ........ _ .... 700500 __ ....................._ ._.._ _ 08/31/89 .... _ .... ..... .... P.G. SOLUTIONS _ .... _ ...._ . _ _ _ _ REPAIR MAINT _ , ....... - - . 329.00 _ .. ... _.... _. _.. _..._._ . - - 329.00 . 115( 1 1888 701350 08/28/89 ,PAVEL, P A T R I C I A PROGRAM REG, FEES 6►0 .00 60.00 211 1 2. ._7 106 G t� / 3 1_x . $ . E -~ DE S I G I G ,_I NC . TRAVEL TRAINING i2b ..y 1 y 39a. 39a.ao 23 �� 1 30 13 1 1 1890 710800 08/28/89 PET CONNECTION PROGRAM SUPPLIES 18.71 18.71 i3,, 15 I. �26 1891 18192 711415 711500 08/28 08/28/89 PHILLIPS -KLEIN COMPANIES, INC, DEP PAY PHOTOS TO .._. 4 41000.00 '4 �a� '3q zsj 1 29 1 E. FOR SERVICE 9.00 9.00 o 1893 720450 03/28/89 PODPE.SKAR, KIM VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 7.02 7. a� f:321 I 1894 73 0050 08/31 QU I GLEY , ANN PROGRAM REGISTRATION 20 .00 2O .00 �•i.i 144 FC +C+A. ;I PROGRAM SUPPLIES 42.62 �C ! ... 4 PROGRAM SUPPLIES PROGRAM S UPPLIES 14 .76 19.31 �. ,a ` 37 ! iu51 PROGRAM S UPPLIES 3 . tag �y 9 i -fir s 18 1 � ___... �. } 11, _ .. .... .. ..... .. _......_ _•.•_.•_•__..._. 18'96 _... .._...._._._.F... 741704 ...._..... 08_/_3 .._ _ - _......_. ....... . ... .._.. -. .. RAMSEY COUNTY ......_. _. _......._ ... �.._._._. ..._ _ . .....- .. ..........__.. _._._._......_._w..._._.... _._.- ........._ ..i.........._....... -«........... rw..-._. �..._._.... ..._..+..... POSTAGE w.........-........_-,.........<-.».. r..w..+.- ._......_... «_.._...«_ r...+ wr.+.. ...wr...__.r.:.+.._.rr..,r.•r. 21.66 - - 21.66 �5 Lill i 1 _ 1897 _ 742110 08/28/89 RAMS'EY EMERG. MEDICAL SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIP _ 208. 208.25 5u 1898 742775 08/31/89 RASMUSSEN, -KAREN PROGRAMS 5.00 5.00 1 - -. {cur 8 + + 761200 08f31l8�� RUAI1_ . RE�'CUE E U - - O_TH .Hr _ -_° 375.03 1 161 10 147 EQUIPMENT OTHER 372.02 6 747.05 +b` 1900 762200 08128/89' ROSSBACH, GEORGE OTHER GONST COSTS .38.82 K. 38 . w . 8 , ? � KU uu 1901 770900 08/28/89 RYDER TRANSPORTATION OUTSIDE RENTAL EQUI PMENT $7.0t� of 8 6 _ _ sal 19oz 780500 08/28/89 SAWYER, CHERYL PROGRAMS 1 25.00 125.00 -. _....._ _. _ 21 , �... 1903 7 08/31 SCHWARTZ, PA I PROGR REGISTRATION 5.00 5.00 7<', ry � 1��r{ 19 04 300375 08/28/819 $ERGO O U TS IDE ENG FEES 197. 1?7. ; ..,.. m... erm.... L- zas- nasx--- ^"- �:r�•-- �- ^-^_'^Lm._� �_.^• < y ,-.,.- X _"........,tn,- ,...-n � - m•. �. .- 'y. ... . .r,.....,•- ^T*t�.**..- - R.*.. « ......nx«+p!: -, ante... r+ m*. y*!!. a !s^vearr^nx,*x _ _ ,. M'7�k'ms'xt'w�3 _DK i V OUCNREG C ITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 10 0 B+ /21 / '• 13a;� VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER a FOR PERIOD 08 2 3 VOUCHER/ _ VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK CHECK V�END'OR CHECK s ;11 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6� 8 - _. _ _ ..__. , ___ _,__ -..: _._....._ _. -._ ._.. _.. _._ ..__... _..__ _ .._._ - F'' R O Gr R A M 10 4 i 4 0 0 - f - 965 ------- . • ' 1 II � 1906 831500 08/28/89 SPECIALTY RADIO SUPPLIES VEHICLE 122.25 REPAIR & MA I NT /R 230.50 '' REPAIR & MAINT /R 55.30 REPAIR 3 MATNT /R ,.. � ,6 _ . ___.__ .... __..... _._- __ T._.._ _ _____.._. -_ ._.._..___ ..- .. ..... ._ .. _____ ___._- _.. _ _.__ .__ _.. _._. - ____. _ S U P P` L I E S EQ 68 491 17 19 190T 831600 08/28/89. SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES OFFICE 18.00 , o _ SUPPLIES OFFICE _ . 35.7; 21 �22 SUPPLIES OFFICE 35.73 23 SUPPLIES OFFICE _.._. _ _.__._. - _ -- -_ _ .__._ 50.16 2a SUPPLIES OFFICE 79.10 SUPPLIES OFFICE 82.58 ;r' SUPPLIES OFFICE 48.50 28 __.._........._ ... r� U F - ,.y.. 29 S BLISS OFFICE 25 1 ?, SUPPLIES OFFICE 4.58 30 SUPPLIES OFFICE 5 9.39 438 .89 31 - 33 1948 840340 08/31 ST.PAUL CA :� TOBACCO, INC. PROGRAM SUPPLIES x8. 68.85 34 .. �35 36 1909 6'4040 -D .. - -..._ _09/'2c I8'9 ST : PAUL CITY . CF PHOT OES 7.5u 37 FEES FOR SERVICE 147 .60 155.10 �9 40 7rE _ . , - - H O . f . - --- - 4 f. t S 4° 0 0 a1 42 43 1911 841200 08/31/89 ST.PAUL 'STEEL SUPPLIES VEHICLE 549.40 as PUC:HASE DISCOUNTS LOS 2.58 551.9 45 46 47 1912 841940 08/28/89 STANDARD REGISTER SUPPLIES OFFICE 85.56 85.5 48 ' 4 50i 1 918 842100 08/31/89 STANDAR SPRING ALIGNMENT REPAIR 4.4.48 4'94 48 1 � r ,, _ _......_...... ------ _ ..._. 52 1914 _ __851575... - ..._.4.8.%28789_. _ SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INS:. SUPPLlt S ..'' 0F �,. L . OE ...__ . 4.9D 5� SUPPLIES OFFICE 9.40 54 S U P P L. I E S O FFICE $_'.. 23.11 56 57 5R 1915 860100 08/28/89 T. J* AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 73.46 159 SUPPLIES VEH. 130.00 60 SUPPLIES VEH. 66. 270.11 62 63 1916 860125 0 8 / 2 8 / 8 9 T.A. S C H I F S K Y S O NS, INC MAINTENANCE MATERIAL _.__ _____...._ _.._._ - - -_ _ -.__ .. ___...._.....__..____.... __ 4_.9... Z 6 7 '_5_$..._ s� h A Y N` ENANCrE MATERIAL 2 005 45 46 2 03 s5 66 pt 67 1917 860305 08/31/89 T.J.T. - SHIRTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3.,9.80 se P RO GRAM SUPPLIES 108.24 478..04 69 70 71 OTHER CONSTRUCTION 27,'70.'97 72 1918 860315 0 8 / 2 8 / 8 9 T . K . D . A . _ . 6, - _ __ _ -- -- - - - - -- - --- 'OUTSIDE EiVG I 'NEER I NG -_ -. _ 54�. 73 OUTSIDE ENGINERRING 1 7, ; OUTS IDE ENGINEERING 3 .69 J76 .. _. _.... TELEPHONE ...._ ._ .._.... ._ _ _.._ - _ 168645 53 TELEPHONE 1 11 .90 rt i J 54 TELEPHONE 67.95 ;. TELEPHONE 81 4 80 56 TELEPHONE 50.94 5577�� TELEPHONE 1 1 Tt 9. ` -\ I VOU 50. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TOW V EH. _ PAGE 11 1zo.o0 l '61 08/21 13 :36 n VOUCHER /CHECI'� S REGITER 'TELEPHONE � i 3.1 . TELEPH 4 45.89 _. FOR PERIOD 08 TELEPHONE 4 46.56 3G T TE LEPHONE 4 44.75 { {; 3T T TELEPHONE � � ...... 3 VOUCHER/ 1 s 071 .90 TEL EP "NE $ »74 a CHECK VENDOR GHEC VENDOR _.._ ITEM I TEM CHECK ►' laz' NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT b T TELEPHONE; 4 41 •55 ± ±�a TELEPHONE 3 35,90 7 Iasi . TELEPHONE P'H ONE _ 3 . 6 6 i 4 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 3,$'9.3 38 »'90 ( E TELEPH 5 5;%.65 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 15.x7 39 , 00 i, 9 T 3 38,90 f f,E U; .. OUTSIDE ENGINEERI 1 3T,9 .57 , 10 (( „I 1919 54065.0 08/31/89 TARGET STORES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 23 .20 ' I, , PROGRAM SUPPLIES 15-87 !, 13 ._..__._..__.. ......___.. ......._.. P 1.i PROGRAMS SUPPLIES .. .. _ _ 19.9z ,4E 141 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.75. ,j,1 PRUGRAM S.UP PL, T ES 30,41 jz PROGRAM SUPPLIES 17.36 120.51 1920 860800 08/28/89 TEAM LAB CHEMICAL SUPPLIES JANITOR $1 .24 I °- z1 1 921 862100 21 22 1 $$OCi ►OTlO 08/2 8/89 , THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEV. CITY SAWEf�VIOE REPAIR & MAINT /V SMALL T OOLS_ 47.76 _ 77.7 47.7 77.70 2.3 13 241 1923 $8 25 00 08/31 TWIN CITY TES ING OUTSIDE. ENG 154.00 4 C 192. ,. 26 CONSTRUCTION Z59.00 I. lr CONSTRUCTION 105,00 1 3. ze OTHER CON ST RUCTION 160.00 870.00 3 .. _. _.... TELEPHONE ...._ ._ .._.... ._ _ _.._ - _ 168645 53 TELEPHONE 1 11 .90 rt i J 54 TELEPHONE 67.95 ;. TELEPHONE 81 4 80 56 TELEPHONE 50.94 5577�� TELEPHONE 1 1 Tt 9. 30 1924 882800 0$ /ZB /89 TWIN CITY TRANSPORT C CONTRACT PYM. 5 50. TOW V EH. _ _ . 70.00 1 1zo.o0 l 31 $9000 0$/2$/$'9 U » COMMUNICATIONS ; 'TELEPHONE ; 3.1 . TELEPH 4 45.89 35 T TELEPHONE 4 46.56 3G T TE LEPHONE 4 44.75 { {; 3T T TELEPHONE � � ...... �38 T T ELEP H ONE 1 1 s 071 .90 TEL EP "NE $ »74 4t,� T TELEPHONE 4 41 .54 i TELEPHONE 4 41.54 ► ►' laz' TE LEPHONE . .54 TELEPHONE 4 41.55 > > T TELEPHONE; 4 41 •55 ± ±�a TELEPHONE 3 35,90 Iasi . TELEPHONE P'H ONE _ 3 . 6 6 i 4 47 T TELEPHONE 3 38 »'90 ats! T TELEPH 5 5;%.65 TELEPHONE 39 , 00 50 T T 3 38,90 f f,E U; ... ....... _ TELEPHON 19650 _.,_._... _ _ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 08/15/89 CHECK #11053 - CHECK #11241 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY GREAVU, JOHN C. 477.58 ROSSBACH, GEORGE 399.42 BASTIAN, GARY W. 399.42 JUKER, FRANCES L. 399.42 ANDERSON, NORMAN G. 399.42 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 2 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 1 WEILAND, ELIZABETH.. 1 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 1 BEHM, LOIS N. 1 JAHN, DAVID J. 931.33 SWANSON, LYLE 1 CUDE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902..28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 2 TAYLOR, LINDA 1,050.28 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 1,083.88 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 1 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 1 LA MOTTE, MARLENE .105.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 1 SELVOG, BETTY D. 212.50 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 1 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 716.18 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 972.68 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 572.57 JAGOE, CAROL 732.68 CARLE, JEANETTE E. 933.97 OLSON, SANDRA 617.70 RONGSTAD, CAROLEE 185.50 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 2 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 1 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 1 NELSON, ROBERT D. 1 FULLER, ELAINE 721.14 OMATH, JOY 350.37 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 1 STILL, VERNON T. 1 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 1 FRASER, JOHN 909.48 NELSON, CAROL M. 1 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 1 STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 1 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 1 BANICK, JOHN J. 1 BOHL, JOHN C. 1 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 1 CLAUSON, DALE K. 1 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 1 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 1 YOUNGREN, JOHN 1 PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 11617.48 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 08/15/89 CHECK #11053 - CHECK #11241 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 1 WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 1 LANG, RICHARD J. 1 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 1 HERBERT, MICHAEL J. 1 DREGER, RICHARD C. 1 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 1 BECKER, RONALD D. 1 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 1 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 1 PAULOS, JR., PAUL G. 1 BOWMAN, RICK A. 1 KAKIS, FLINT D. 1 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 1 GRAF, DAVID M. 1 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 1 PALMA, STEVEN T. 1 VORWERK, ROBERT E. 1 BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 1 MEEHAN, JAMES 1 MELANDER, JON A. 1 SAUNDERS, SARAH 780.25 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 1 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 1 RABINE, JANET L. 1 BOYER, SCOTT K. 999.88 WALDT, CYNTHIA 804.68 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 1 FEHR, JOSEPH 910.52 NELSON, KAREN A. 1 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 1 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 502.73 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 2 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 1,087.88 MEYER, GERALD W. 1 KANE, MICHAEL R. 1 NAGEL, BRYAN 845.16 LUTZ, DAVID P. 1 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 1 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 999.40 HELEY, RONALD J. 1 OSWALD, ERICK D. 1 COLLINS, STEPHEN 350.75 FREBERG, RONALD L. 1 CASS, WILLIAM C. 1 ZACK, TODD 420.00 LINDBLOM, RANDY 1 ELIAS, JAMES G. 1 PECK, DENNIS L. 1 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 1 IRISH, BRUCE A. 1 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 1 METZ, TERRY 11049.76 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 08/15/89 CHECK #11053 - -CHECK #11241 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY LOFGREN, JOHN R. 950.86 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 1 BRENNER, LOIS J. 1 KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. 486.34 STAPLES, PAULINE 1 JONES, LUTHER 72.00 BOWES, WILLIAM 426.25 COKLEY, T. 366.00 TRAVERS, DANIEL 121.50 MC MANN, KEVIN 383.00 MARUSICH, M. JAMIE 345.00 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 1 LINDORFF,.DENNIS P. 1 GARRY, WILLIAM 992.68 HELEY, ROLAND B. 1 MARUSKA, MARK A. 1 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 818.28 AURELIUS, ERIC 412.50 BURKE, MYLES R. 1 BRENNER, JAY 452.00 BURKHARDT, DANIEL 345.00 MAYERS, JILL 146.25 AURELIUS, KIRSTEN 174.69 DOUGHTY, LINDA 448.00 BERTHIAUME, K. 125.00 SHELDON, LEO 70.00 HANNEGAN, ANDREA 40.00 MILLER, SHERRAL 148.36 DREGER, KARI 135.00 JORDAN, CARA 42.00 DAVY, M. 80.00 CLEVELAND, JENNIFER 85.00 HOLLAND, ANDREA 151.25 LEKO, ANNETTE 73.66 FORD, JENNIFER 80.93 GRAF, MICHAEL 293.75 CAMPBELL, D. 127.50 JANSEN, PAUL 291.25 PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY J. 267.50 CLEAVELAND, K. 102.30 HERBER, TODD 127.20 WILLIAMS, AARON 18.00 NARUSIEWICZ, MIKE 40.00 ANDERSON, CHRISTIE 211.20 BESETH -JR, RONALD 211.65 FALVEY, K. 80.00 NELSON, JACKIE 93.60 IKHAML, JENNY 36.00 IKHAML, JIM 150.00 DIEBEL, GERALD 315.50 RAHN, CARY 91.30 JORDAN, ERIC 82.65 DORNBUSCH, AMY 130.50 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 08/15/89 CHECK #11053 - CHECK #11241 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 1,372.68 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. 1 NELSON, JEAN 375.21 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 567.94 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 898.49 FISHER, LYNE 175.00 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 1 BARTA, MARIE L. 954.28 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 1 SUNDGAARD, L. 192.00 MISKELL, NANCY 328.59 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 490.58 ROBERTS, KENNETH 1 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 1,455.32 OSTROM, MARJORIE 1,563.08 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 1,187.88 LOFGREN, ROSANNE 31.50 WENGER, ROBERT J. 1 LA CASEE, TELLY 105.00 LA CASEE, CASEY 136.50 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 1 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 1 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. 1 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 1 EDSON, DAVID B. 1 MARTINSON, ERIC _ _ _ ___ - - - - -- -442.75 GERMAIN, DAVE 1,174_.28 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 1 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 1 $173,128.49 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 $ 7 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION 24,665.00 AFSCME 2725 476.30 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 160.00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC 18.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 191.00 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 505.41 $ 33,117.27 GRAND TOTAL $206,245.76 AGENDA REPORT 01101F Cit Mana FROM: MIS Coordinator, Elizabeth J. Weiland SUBJECT: BUDGET TRANSFER - COMPUTER CABLING DATE: Au 10, 1989 INTRODUCTION Action b Council.: Endorsed.- Modif ied Rejected Date.---. Several departments within the Cit are re installation of five additional data lines for access to personal computers and printers. Immediate nee exist for the followin departments: Communit Development, Finance and Parks and Recreation. Complete cablin g is al necessar for the proposed buildin addition re at least 12 data lines. A q uote of $5,750.00 has been received f rom. Peoples Communication S to install a 200 pair cable allowin an additional 48 communication ports. Included in the bid is installation of the five data lines mentioned above., BACKGROUND Durin the initial phases of construction of the Cit Hall, several conduit lines were laid under the entr wa fo for the purpose of wirin the computer s and peripherals. Durin construction the entr wa cement foundation was disturbed causin a collapse of one of the conduit lines terminatin further cablin to.outl areas of the Cit Hall, 41 Conse installation of the 200 pair cable is re to meet current and future computer needs. RECOMMENDATION It is therefore recommended that authorization to transfer $5,750.00 from the contin account to account 101-110-4730 be approved. ' � \, � � .~ \ __ �� ` AGENDA ITEM �- �° ~ Action by Council: AGENDA REPORT Endorsod~______' TO: City Manager Modlf iod�._�_� Rejected- FROM: Publ ic Works Coordinator ~---~�� D�t SUBJECT: Final Payment--Project B9-14, Bituminous Resurfacing DATEu August 22, 1989 Application for final payment has been made for the work accomplished on the above-named project. Bids were received for furnishing and placing 4900 tons of bituminous material on July 19, 1989 and a contract was awarded to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. on July 24, 1989. The amount of the contract was $85,946 or $17.54 per ton. The streets originally scheduled for reSurfacing required a total of 4934 tons of mix. A large patch, too large to do by hand, on Burke just west of White Bear Avenue required 78 tons at a cost of $1,368.12. Dorland Road from Boxwood to Carver was also included due to severe erosion and heaving of the mat. Approximately 407. of the existing roadway was washed down to Carver Avenue in a storm on the night of July 14, 1989. Resurfacing of Dorl and Road required 1007 tons of mix at a cost of $17,663.66. B,Ud Impact The total cost of the work accomplished by Northwest Asphalt, Inc. was $104,977.78. The cost of adjuSting rings and glue for sanitary sewer manholes and water valve boxes was $5,953.00. The amount budgeted for this project was $120,000. Action Re Uired Approval of the final payment in the amount of $104,977.78 is recommended. . WCC jw Attachment i h� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD 1=4 I"1AF'LEWOUD, MINNESOTA ._I ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL P( Estimate No , 1 Period Ending 8 -17 , 19 89 Sheet 1 of 1 f -'r. o, j e c t 1\1 o. 8 9 -14 ........ Project Bituminous Resurfaci n oi� i g i n a l Contract Amount 85 9 Total Contract Work Completed to Date :l 85 v 946.00 •� .Total Approved Credits -0- Total Approved E;•: tra VJork C.:omp l et ed 19 031. 78 Approved E;.; tra Orders Amount Completed :V- 19 031 .78 Total Amount Earned This Estimate 104, 977. Less Approved Credits $ -0- Less Percent Retained $- - 0 - Less Prev i outs Payments Total Lreduc t i on s $ -0- Amoutnt Erne This Estimate 104, 977.78 ContractorZl / l '' Date ' Z q Engineer^ 1:1 at e Ci. Engineer Date Agenda Number � —' AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: City Manager Finance Director BUDGET CHANGE FOR DONATED VEHICLE August 18, 1989 Action by Endorsed..., ...,��.;:,; „ Modified.... Rejected Dat The UPS has donated a 1968 van to the City for use in the Public Safety Department. The vehicle has a value of $1,100. According to generally accepted accounting principles (GAA ' P), which the City is legally required to follow, this donation must be recorded as receipt of $1,100 of revenue (account 101 -3803) and as a $1,100 capital outlay expenditure (101 - 402- 4b10). It is recommended that the Council approve corresponding budget changes to prevent the expenditures from exceeding the budget. DFF: kaz Agenda Number AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: BUDGET CHANGE DATE: August 18, 1989 Endorse Modif i ed.-.,.,__._.__r R e J e c t e d �....,..�_,_.. Date INTRODUCTION A budget adj ustment is needed to finance 1989 personnel costs for the Nature Center employees due to an oversight. BACKGROUND During the preparation of the 1990 Proposed Budget, it was discovered that the wrong pay rate was used for two Nature Center employees. The 1989 cost of personnel services for Nature Center employees should have been $80,190, requiring an additional $4,200 transfer from the contingency account to the appropriate accounts. ACTION REQUIRED Council approval of preceding transfer and budget changes. Action by Council:] DFF:kaz C-7 Act ion by Council : i Endorse dn..._, .�,..., Mo difie d._ MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, From: Robert D. Odegard, Re: Budget Change Da te: August 22 , 1989 City Manager Director o f Park & ReJected -., Date Rec rea t i o Introduction A budget adjustment is needed to finance 1989 personnel costs for the Nature Center employees due to an oversight* Background During the preparation of the 1989 proposed budget, plans f or the Nature Center included the expansion of the program to seven day service and additional hours in the evening to provide more pro- g rams ra.ms for the community. In the Spring of this year, we added an additional part -time naturalist to work Sunday afternoons and to sup the summer program with a limited number of hours during the week to take care of special programs. Our part - time hired 'naturalist is a full -time teacher in the St. Paul school system working with disabled students and brings a very special talent, not only in working with nature elements, but also with disadvan- d eo le. Her work has been exceptional and we would like to tage p p s ex continue this part of the program. We have al e by ten hours p er week the work of part -time Naturalist Ann Hutchinson to provide other weekend assistance and special programs during the week. our revenues from special' programs will cover part of the additional expenditure, but far more important is the service that is being provided. The alternative would be to cut weekend service and expanded revenue producing evening programs. A 1989 budget adjustment is needed as only part of the additional costs g � for the preceding were included in the budget requests due to an oversight. We, therefore, are asking that an additional $4,200 be transferred from the Cont ingency Account to the appropriate accounts. Ac tion Requ ired Council approval of preceding transfer and budget changes. F -/ Action by Council: Endorse - Mo difi ed W-0 I slow MEMORANDUM Rej e ct e d_,., Manager Date TO: City Y g FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Approval for Tax- exempt Financing PROJECT: Maplewood Care Center (1905 Cope Avenue) DATE August 21, 1989 INTRODUCTION VOA Care Centers, is requesting preliminary approval of tax- exempt financing for $4,300,000 in order to purchase the site occupied by the Maplewood Care Center from Volunteers of America Care Facilities. This is being done to refinance existing taxable debt with tax- exempt debt, thereb reducing their interest expense. The City would receive 22,606 in administrative fees at the closing. 'CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL The City Council approved criteria for tax - exempt financing on December, 1988. (Refer to the resolution on page 4.) There are several criteria that apply: 1. General Requirement #1: "The project shall be ,consistent with the City's comprehensive plan, zoning, Community Design Review Board standards and all other applicable ordinances." This project does not comply with the following ordinances: a. Section 36 -22(d) requires that "All parking lots shall have continuous concrete curbing surrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. " There is 'a bituminous curb around the south parking lot and curb blocks only around the north lot. b.. Section 36 -27(e) requires that "Trash container enclosures hall be provided around all trash containers and shall be 100% opaque. They shall be protected by concrete - filled steel ,posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure. In all instances, the enclosure must be of .a. design,, material and color compatible with the building and be kept in good repair. A gate that provides 100% ,opaqueness shall be provided. The Community Design Review Board may waive any part of these requirements if they find that the trash container would be hidden from adjacent properties and streets." There is an unscreened dumpster 'in one of the drives. A _single, partial wood screen is constructed in the parking lot. C. The Building Code requires that a building of this type be sprinklered throughout. The building is sprinklered only in the hallways and laundry area. The fire marshall stated that the hallways are the least important area for sprinklers in terms of safety to residents and fire protection. The entire building should be sprinklered, including the residents' rooms. 2. Commercial requirement 2.a.- states that: "The project shall involve an existing business that the City wishes to expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract. (1) Existing business criteria: Any expansion, relocation or rehabilitation of an- existing business may be considered for approval." This project is to refinance existing debt and does not include expansion, relocation or rehabilitation. 3. There are two other problems with this site: a. There is no specific requirement for a minimum number of parking spaces for nursing homes. There is, however, insufficient parking. There are 15 parking spaces alon g the entrance drive. 4 -5 cars park along the curb in the drive aisle in the north parking lot. When I viewed the site on July 19, there were eight cars parked on Castle Avenue next to the "no parking" signs Adding additional parking - spaces would probably require use of the land to the southwest, which is also owned by the Volunteers of America. Several years ago I recieved a proposal - to , develop this site with an apartment project . Before this adjacent property is sold off for another development or the existing nursing home is sold to another corporate entity for refinancing, the parking problem with the existing development should be resolved. b. The address assigned by the City is 1905 Cope Avenue. 1900 .Sherren Avenue is the address used by the nursing home. The City Clerk states that this causes problems with City mailings. Sherren Avenue is a private drive to Cope Avenue. DISCUSSION The purpose of tax- exempt financing is to promote the expansion of an existing business or construction of a new business that the City feels would provide a needed service, create new jobs or provide additional tax revenue. This project would produce no new services, tax revenue or employment. The only.public benefit would be the one -time $22.,606 administrative fee. If public money is going - to be lost by exempting this project from State and .Federal taxes, there should be a public benefit. Simply refinancing existing debt to lower interest costs is not consistent with the City's criteria. An existing business must .involve expansion, relocation or rehabilitation. In order to qualify, this project should involve rehabilitation to bring the site and building up to current code standards. In order to comply with City criteria, the applicant has agreed to the recommendations made by staff. (Refer to attached memo on page 8. RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution on page 10 giving preliminary approval to tax - exempt financing of $4,,300,,000 for VOA Care Centers, subject to including the following improvements to the building and site in the bond agreement: a. The remainder of the building must be sprinklered to meet the building code over a two - year period. b. 13 additional parking spaces shall be added, subject to approval of the Community Design Review Board. Concrete curbing shall be provided around the new parking spaces and the two existing lots. C. The trash enclosure shall be screened to meet'City Code. 1d. Change the address to 1905 Cope Avenue. MEM011 Attachments: 1. Resolution stating City's Tax- exempt Financing Requirements 2. Property /Zoning Map 3. Applicants memo 4. Resolution 3 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY APPROVAL OF TAX-EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE FINANCING Whereas., the following requirements for approval of tax mortgage revenue financing by the City of Maplewood, Minnesota have been established in order" to protect the public heal th 'safety and wel fare v and to ensure the r:i`/ic and financial wel] being 04 the City and its residents. Whereas, the following requirements for approval of tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing by the City :zf Maplewood, Minnesota has been established by great amounts of effort and research in the interest of its citizens, and Whereas, if any segment or portion of these requirements are rendered ~ roid by Subsequent action taken by governing bodies of superior status or the courts, the remainder of these conditions will not be voided or |' ' | affected. ' " NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following requirements are adopted for City approval of tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ~~_ The following requirements 'must be met for City approval of all tax- ex The project shall be consistent with the City's comprehensive -plan, zoning, Community Design Review Board standards and all other a.pplicable*. ordinances. Approval sfor a plan amendment, rezoning, conditional use permit, variance or site and building design must be obtained concurrently with or prior tco, preliminary approval for tax- exempt financing. Hearing notices shall be sent to all property owners within 350 feet of the construction site at least ten days before the hearing. 2. The project shall not require a significant amount of public /enditures for City improvements, such as roads, sewers and water mains, if the City Council determines that the site area is premature for development* 3. The notes or bonds shall be for an issue of not lessthan 4. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval. The City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is shown. 5. Contractors doing work on projects funded in whole or in part by tax-exempt mortgage revenue financing: a~ Shall not discriminate in the hiring and firing of employees ' on basis of race, color, creed, re*ligion national origin, ,sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. ' Attachment 1 4 ba, Shall compensate employees with wages and financial remunera- tion as provided under the United States Co---deg Section 276A, as amended through June 23 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.440 Shall be re eo% of the jobs crea e projec uired to employ Minnesota residents in at least ted b th' t and,, at 1 east 60% of the g roup shall be residents of the seven-county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categories shall be determined as of the date of the project's approval b the City Council . However, if the contractor can show that these q uotas are not +easibl e because of a shortage of q ual if ied personnel i. n tractor ma re the Cit COUncil for a specific sif.illsi the con release from the two residency re The re shall cont i nue + or the durat i on of the construct i on pro ect d Shall be active participants in a State of Minnesota apprentice programl approved b the . Department of Labor and Industrys All provisions of this tax%-exempt finance re shall apply to all subcontractors working on the projects 6 licant shall use a bond counsel designated b the Citys The app COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENTS The f o l l o w i n g add i t i oval re i rements shal 1 a pp 1 y to commerc i al projects: 1. Definitions: "Commercial project" is defined as an existing business or new business venture involving the manufacture, distribution,. sale, storage or rendering of an merchandise, real estate, produce, f ood 5 housing or services which will produce income for one or more individuals* bw "Existing businessil is defined as an operating industry or commercial enterprise with at least one y ear of operational histor within the Citys ca "New businessis is defined as an industrial or commercial enterprise which does not q ualify as an existing business. 2N Requirements: that the City i a nvolve an The project shall i existing business ashes to expand or a new business which the Cit wishes to attracts t 1) Existing business criteria: An expansion, re o cat ion or rehabilitation of an existing business ma be considered for approvals 5 (2) New business criteria: A new business may only be considered for approval if it: (a) 0++ers at least 400 hours per week of new employment opportundties on a year-round basis. or (b) Involves the rehabilitation of a vacant or ' scheduled to be vacated structure, or (c) Is within a designated development or redevelopment target area and (d) Possesses a low potential for creating pollution~ b. A written opinion, with supporting justification, =rom a qualified expert acceptable to the City shall be submitted with the ap' r lication to document that the proposed business will not adversely affect similar, existing businesses" This requirement businesses that w��uld be may be waived if there are no similar affected. c^ The project must exceed minimum code requirements by incorporation at least five of the following features into the p roject: - Bric:k - Building design should be a distinctive, nongeneric style . with meaningful details - A noticeable increase in the size and quantity of landscape plantings over *hat is normally required . - Underground irrigation of all landscaping - Open space, other than required sstbacks - At least 10% more parking than code requires ' Walkway along street +rontages ' Al l park ing stal l widths at l east ten feet ' Al l signsi shal l be at 1 east 20% smal l mer or fewer in number than al l owed by code \The +ol win dd* l requirement s shall apply ling � projec ._� � 1 Attachment 2 ►8� 1��89 17 23 IT0113 - VOLUN OF AMER r2 Z 002 To: Jeff Andersen Bros: Angel Sewall gub3ect • . pralipinary A p p roval of Maplewood Care Center for Tax Ixempt Financing Date: July 27, 1988 Eesponse to criter for approval = NNW Mal NO see attached bid). Y ' concrete the area along the south . question why the city didn et of a� halt curbing was installed) l .ot (approxi 3DO fa p sewer that was a part of the city asseesaeht for the water and se upiraade. • : The Kaintenance Department wi inotal a, 1OOx opaque, anchored s er. A enclosure around the du�ap ate of the sane material will t � also be installed. ; - rain comply with request (Gee urrent sprinkl syst includes the attached bid). The r smoking areas • the hallways, laundry, dieta", and g f � breakroos • we have 1$ stoke detectors thru o ut the building ( all are over 6 feet in diameter have smoke day lour�es that r e Also have beat detectors in our de tector*)@ "intenanco shop, and stairwell corridors. on July 25 1989, I Duf our, Maintenance Supervisor and Jim Exbertson, mo t w ith den DuL Fire Marshall to dfscusa this situat Jim st ated that he wouid be agreeable to a 5 year upgrade of the systee s S inaluding WSPI resident rooss, over a 2 year period 1 believe we would .r tat in the . doMunity l provide a safer snhance our reputati envfronmen t for our residents , and possibly reduce our insuran ce prestuns signifiosfttly. Wm {see attachment) we could 13 addst parking spots to " this areas The Fire Marshall ." ban w plan to ark cars dia0allY � instead of ltas no problem" w our p p pies and he - does not feel it is a hindrance to fires F parall e Q D ui pent (meets oode, etc). In all o f Maplewood of the years 9 's ex the c ity has never maintained the street Care Center xl + is that NO p l owing, re p ai rs,. ,- etc ) , A good Doe; ibi 1 ity swim ( sno w D 1 g � p and too . I v the street even though we have been told both y e t, re command that we p ress for a def answer regard this area an resolve th parkin problem I suggest. of Address - We are willing to change our address, t. Change �t bo �r ever rope is not a "better address sinco It i8 not a thru street, eta. 0IV3CII9x__ 46 Attachment 3 E'� �8� 10i89 17.23 VO l 13 -� VOLUN OF AMER Maplewood Tax Exempt Re- mlinancins Pate 2 change address affix str* *t sient. etc. Also , to conaider an address of Hazel or Castle streets (Area eap review may show Cope dross not better, etc) The addres is important to vendors, v isi tor s, etc and should be related to stree naps , . abi 1 i ty to loc=ate care canter. CC: Ken Dufour r� i i ^�� -_ � AGENDA ITEM =�-� ' Action by CounolI-V AGENDA REPORT EndozssdL___�~�� Mud1fied__�_~�~� T\]: City Manager Rejeoted_�~��~�_� FROM: Assistant City Engineer Dat SUBJECT: Keller Parkway/County Road C Water Main, Project 88-10 --Award of Bid DATE: August 21, 1989 Introduction Attached is a bid tabulation for the subject project. A resolution to award the bid to Danner, Inc. in the amount of $112,663.40 is provided. As of this date, no appeals of the assessments have been filed with district court. Appeals may be filed until August 24, 1989. Barring a significant number of appeals just before the deadline, i t A the financing for this projec t s se . war d of bid is appropriate. Reco It is recommended that Danner, Inc. be given award of bid for this project. BAI jw Attachments KELLER P MY /CWM ROAD C WATER MAIN, PROJECT 88 -10 DWIER INC. BRM & CRI S rNN��N RD-SO CEKTW CTING �f r �N�M�NrN�NN�►�N�� IT91 �� DESCRIPTI CHIT N�N�N�� QUANTITY UNIT PRICE �N�N��rMNrN�N�N�N��Nf��M� TOTAL PRICE WIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 Can. to Exi WM, HN/DOT 2504 Ea. 2 $350.00 $700.00 $220.00 $440.00 $9 1 000.00 $18,000.00 2 8' SJ DIP WM CI . 52, HWDOT 2504 L.F. 1518 $11.25 $26,185.50 $25.90 $39,316o20 $35.00 $53,130.00 3 8' RJ DIP WM, C1. 52, HWD0T 2504 L.F. 867 $20.25 $17 $2830 $25 $40.00 $34 9 680.00 4 6' SJ DIP WM, Cie 53, MUDOT 2504 L.F. 54 x20.00 $1 $41.80 $2, 257.20 $30.00 $i , 620.00 5 6' MJ Hydr. Assem., M!/DOT 2504 Ea. 5 $1 $5 $1,265900 $6,325.00 $1 $7 6 8' MJ Bate Val & Box, MN/DOT 2504 Ea. 4 $500.00 $2,000,00 $495.00 $1 $500.00 $2 7 6' MJ Gate Val & Box, Ml/DOT 2504 Ea. 5 $400.00 $2 $360.00 $1 $400.00 $2,000.00 8 MJ CIP WM Fittings, M!/DOT 2504 Lbs. 3050 $1.40 $4,270.00 $1.25 $3 $i.50 $4 9 Replace Ex. SS With DIP, M!/DOT 2504 L.F. 80 $30.00 $2, 400, G0- $21.00 $2 $35900 $2, 800.00 10 Pol Encase. , 6' do 8' ,M!/DOT 2504 L.F. 415 $0.65 $269.75 $1.40 $581.00 52.00 $830.00 11 Trench/BF /Pneuma, 1' Serv.,MN/DOT 2504 L.F. 703 $9.00 $6,327.00 $19.40 $13,638.20 $15.00 $10,545.00 12 Trench/BF, Air Vent, N1/DOT 2504 Ea. 2 $350.00 $700900 $425.00 $850.00 $500.00 $1,000800 13 Saw Cut Bit., MUDOT 2104 L.F. 2061 $1800 $2,061.00 $1.25 $2,516.25 $2900 $4,122.00 14 Coarse Aggreg. , hN/DOIT 2105 L.F. 250 $1.20 $300,00 $8420 S2 $6.00 $1 15 Gran. Barrow, pipe bed.,Ml/DOl' 2105 C.Y. 100 $8600 $800400 $9.70 $970.00. $8.00 $800.00 16 Agg. Base, Class 5, WDOT 2211 T. 1608 $8190 $14 $845 $13,748.40 $1540 $24 17 Bit. Base Course, M!/DOT 2331 /2332 T. 260 $15.00 $3, 900 A $14970 $3, 822.00 $38.00 $9, 880.00 18 Bi to Wear Cou Ml/DUT 2341 Ea. 350 $20600 $7 $19495 $6, 982.0 $38, 00 $13 19 Bi to Material for Mixture T. 32.7 $130.00 $4,25140 $137.00 $4 $140.00 $4,578.00 20 Bit. Mat. for Tack Coat, HWDOT 2357 Gal. 107 $1420 $128.40 $1.25 $13175 $2.00 $214o00. 21 Sign and Traffic Control, MIUTCD L.S. 1 $1 $1, 000.00. $1 $1, 300..00 $5, 000.00 $5, 000.00 22 Rmme 24' RCP, MW 2104 Ea. 1 $300.00 $300M. . $200.00 $200.00 $1 $1 23 2'Rigid Insulation S.F. 64 $2910 $134,40- $1.55 $99.20 $100 $192.00 24 Calcium Chloride, Ml/DOT 2131 T. 1.5 $300.00 $450.00 $416.00 $62430 $100000 $150.00 25 Topsoil Borrw, MW 2105 C.Y. 346 $8.00 $2 $9000 $3 $9600 $3,114.00 26 Sodding, MUDOT 2575 S.Y. 1300 1975 $2 1 275:00_ $1965 $2,145.00 $135 $2,27100. 27 Seeding, MN/DOT 2575 Ac. 0.56 200 $112.00. $520.00 $291.20 $200.00 $112.00 28 Seed, Mix, 500, MUDOT 2575 Lbs, 28 4 $ 11240, $4.20 $117960 $4.00 $112.00 . 29 Wood Fiber Blanket, MN/DOT 2575 S.Y. 1262 1.45 $1 $1.20 $1, 514.40 $1.25 $1 577.50 . 30 Mul ch, Type.1, M!/DGT 2575 T. 0.5 200 $100.00_ $420.00 $210.00 $200.00 $100400 31 Can. Fer t i l . , wN/D T 2575 T. 0.21 425 $89425 $415.00 $87.15 $400.00 $84400 32 Disc Anchoring, Mt/DOT 2757 Ac. 0.23 100 $23.00 $11530 $26.45 $100800 $23.00 33 Si l t Fence, Ml/DOT 2575 L.F. 413 2.25 $929.25 $235 $970.55 $2.00 $►826.00 34 Bale Checks for Erosion, WDOT 2573 Ea. 4 10 $40.00- $29.50 $118000 $10800 $40.00 35 Mechanical Street Sweeping Hrs. 4 65 $26030 $68000 $272.00 $7540 $300.00 36 Test & Flush Ex. Main, Pala Ct. L.F. 1 500 $500.00 $260.00 $260900 $500.00 $5 CA Total $112 $144 $212 1 599.50 TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the Ci±y Council of Maplewood was convened at 9 a.m., Friday, June 23, 1989. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read ` aloud bids for construction of Keller Parkway/County Road C Water Main, City Project 88-10. Present were: Dennis Peck, James Gessele Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read: BIDDER BID AMOUNT BID BOND Danner, Inc. $112 5% Brown & Cris 144,328.75 5% Ro-So Contracting 212,599.50 57. Pursuant to prior instruction of the council , the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation to the city council meeting. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, thatthe bid of Danner, Inc. in the amount of $112,663.40 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Keller ' Parkway/County Road C Water Main, City Project 88-10, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and di`ected to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. Action b council:, 0 Endorsed..... Modified MEMORANDUM ]Rej ected,..._____..W D at 'TO: Cit Mana FROM.: Director of Communit Development SUBJECT: Woods and Ponds Preliminar Plat Application -DATE.* Au 21, 1989 INTRODUCTION The Cit Council, on Au 14, tabled the Woods and Ponds preliminar plat, and referred it to the Soil Conservation Service . to determine what could be done to improve the q ualit y of both of the existin ponds. Council also wanted additional information to determine whether the soils under pond A would have to be removed. DISCUSSION * The first q uestion is whether the Cit can re that the ,developer retain pond "A", as was re in the Currie Street Addition. There are onl two situations in which cit Code prohibits the fillin of wetlands - where the wetland is proposed for pondin in the Cit draina plan or where the wetland is .ne for water q ualit y . Pond "All is not shown on the Cit stormwater plan. Determinin whether the pond is needed for water q ualit y is more difficult to determine, The Cit environmental protection ordinance defines water . in terms of the ponds abilit to remove nutrients from run-off that enters the pond. Section 9-191 (( prohibits fillin a wetland where the natural nutrient strippin capacit of the wetland would fall below the nutrient production of the wetland . watershed for its projected development When this plat was reviewed b the SCS in 1987, the advised us that pond "All was -needed for water q ualit y purposes. Since then, the SCS has advised us that new research in the water q ualit y field has chan their thinkin on what t of ponds best provide for water q ualit y . Previousl it was thou that shallow ponds with ve worked best. Now it is felt that deeper ponds with less ve work best. As a result, Tom Peterson,, the Conservation District Mana for the Ramse SCS, advised me that M r, Cave's .proposal. to fill wetl and ,"A" and excavate pond "B" would substantiall improve the water quality . over the current situation-* Maintainin pond "All and excavatin both ponds would have relativel little effect on the water q ualit y compared to .Mr.. Cave's proposal. Pond "All was not proposed as a storm water holdin pond in the Currie Street proposal. Therefore, the pond would have treated onl the minor run-off from the adjacent lots. The run-off from most of the lots and the street was proposed to be drained to pond "B". Mr. Peterson further stated that Mro Cave's proposal would meet the water q ualit y standards of the Cit environmental protection ordinance. The primar valu of pond "All is for esthetic purposes. The second q uestion from the Council concerned whether soils would have to be removed from the pond " A " site to build homes. The - SCS report states that the soils under lots 2 and 3 are poorly suited for development. These soils should be replaced with suitable mineral soils before these lots are used. These findings are confirmed by a soils report done:in 1986 for Mr. Cave that show that underlying the f ill in the area of pond " A " , there is a three -foot thickness of peat, which extends 6 -9 feet below the present fill surface. This ' material must be removed for construction of floor slabs or foundations or as a subgrade for pavements. The engineer who did the report recommended removal of the + peat. The subgrade should then be inspected by a qualified soil engineer prior to fill and /or constrction. A copy of the report is attached. As a result of the SCS and preliminary soils report, item l.b. on page 3 of the staff report recommends that "An opinion shall be submitted by certified soils expert which describes the soil correction procedures necessary.to prepare the areas proposed as building sites for lots 1, 2 and 3 of block one. These procedures shall be included in the developer's agreement." RECOMMENDATION Approve the preliminary plat as recommended in the July 24 staff report. MEMO5 attachments: 1 SCS report 2. Soils report 3. July 24 staff report 2 RAMSEY SOIL ANDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Dairy Center of Minnesota 2015 Rice Street Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Telephone: (612) 488 -1476 MINNESOTA 1 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT BAY0 Date : To From: Subject May 3., 1989 Geoff Olson, Maplewood City Planner Robert Johnson District Plat /Site Plan Review Committee Cave's woods and Ponds Addition Attention should be given to the soil noted in lots 2 and 3. As pointed out in Mr. Petersen's report, the Aquolls and Histosols soils are very poorly suited to development. These poor building soils should be replaced with suitable mineral soils before these lots are used. 3 Attachment 1 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Dair Center of Minnesota 2015 Rice Street Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Telephone: (612) 488-1476 MINNESOTA L SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT i" '1 4 1989 Date: Ai r - To: Robert Johnson, District Site Plan/1:11at Review Committee From Tom P. Peterson, Conservation District Manager- 0 , , `-- Sub Cave,�-�-. Woods and Ponds Addition I. lntrc�duction 1h.'e-1 proposa-2- is t(--) r_1Aeve1(DP 1 9 lots on approximately 10 a es. Tl-ip promosed site is located near the y tersect-,-)n c-� ... eur Avenue and McKniqht Road i1 S M -a i P The wa.s. prev iov.-isly platted as Cave's c ~ 1 -r Cq-�- t Additi J_ i n. -= r"he rea in question is within - .. fi tL.:; - - -i r . r - c: rshed District and .L -It J. _:aMZ.'J " -WaSh -_4Vt(-' letr ;qate does n) A WatLeg_ Resourl_.e.s i ts: .6 . Ttira Ramsey County Soils Survey indicates that .4- A- -1 1 i S Tr fiapi-J.LnQ Urlits ma be found on n f at n contained in th-* s report rnd Fc r 1-nd, use. pla.,nnin tDnl%p .--te , :jl -,n cited --hc)�_ild he cilia if ied by l .- -A- __L�._ Z6 =1 _L_ %_.ru!-,ijt.er ciener._7= t a c,)r. a A -4- • A. e. t_ H. a r- 112% 6 t - a ined Soil. it I.- A I t ed vel .. c, T 4.0p 'L 4r A. A t y T C- r7 -U-1er vary L) A :E7 very j I - - . , . ... _. -4-1 ! sites (see *1 -1 -t y 1.;) %::1 r 1. A A % Both t r. ec -tie D__,Nrz. e, - i t 1-- Soils i I Ue w J. t I AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER The proposed development will fill the smallest of the two, redirecting its very limited drainage area to the larger. All post development drainage will be directed via storm sewer into several.regional detention ponds to the south which eventually flow into Beaver Lake, Summary and Recommendations Mr. Cave has met with me to discuss his proposed development. The small wetland area he proposes to fill is l a ndlocked and is less than 1/4 acre in size. The lar wetland on site is presentl chocked with purple loosestrife and is of very little value, as a wetland ecosystem. What Mr. Cave proposes to do, is trade the smaller wetland for an improved lar wetland. Bein familiar with the site, it is my opinion that what is proposed is not unreasonable. However, I strongl recommend that the poor building soils be removed from lots 2 and 3 alon Larpenteur and replaced with suitable mineral sells . for- erosion and ' sediment control durin the construction ph,,:3se, I believe the proposed measures <._%hould be adequate with the exception that I would add a temporar rock entrance pad. Please call me at th District Office if y ou have an t v V * c 11-7 w F� V, WAWA em LT 1 A tiL long 14 P rf 3r jJ I k6 IL4 -A I %,hCA=. lean% e 1 5 1 'a a I. • I x : 1 161 e L� f4w ; "M y v 1 {� t� � wr U ff M��e $ ♦ _ fie' '�- �p � '' � ..� un new -A ra f-. epro*—x r" 'A *WIL U01 XIM tru, q R!'""! q p �' �.1' '� 7ff6 /lritiP tIGT w r 0 � � f 7 11 r upc "*XA k rv�-. � lF:� • r� ,ate �!"� ��ra '�M�ir � s-�'C� .�r ;.� � Ali ,FRI 616 0 P 17 OJ MP'O i N e V& lvols�� % I s I t *=W &NIL Ve MM A J.W%'A% •� � j ...�.d ¢ t � � � t"W JJ: A anew , # � 6 W OW %6, =6_ k 'q 14P tm I e!j %4 t a, Aar ALA -#-- "W I .L; % 1 c! t: b u 4 * 1 I PI lucr. a- on, r� +.v7.h R- � 2- 2. H rl A p It i rl Ir li T T7 &A s» am AWV T X-V ':%w'n T I M = =MR A= Aar v T IV &.* S Y MS rMUMMAWIMM Jos No, X -86242 PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SsEs OF EAST LARPENTEUR AVE, & MCKNIGHT ROAD MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA A REPORT PREPARED FOR ED CAVE k SONS, INC$ DECEMBER, 19 .7 Attachment 2 . i 4� R i Jos No, X -86242 PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SsEs OF EAST LARPENTEUR AVE, & MCKNIGHT ROAD MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA A REPORT PREPARED FOR ED CAVE k SONS, INC$ DECEMBER, 19 .7 Attachment 2 pin REPORT ON PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION E. LARPEIVT"E[JR AVE. & M(1CNIGHT RD. MAPLEvwD, MINNESOTA We were retained by Mr. Sam Cave of Ed Cave & Sons, Inc m . to perfor ro sed residential subdivision at East Larpenteur a soil on investigati for a proposed access problems associated with Avenue and McKnight Road. Du e to of the 4 proposed test holes were drilled S oft round and wet lands , only 2 P Po g at this time . The purposes of our work was to determine the general soil is site and to a preliminary report :.and roundwater conditions at this P including g eneral recomnendat ions for foundation design of our findings, ' test holes are and site d Two additional earned when the site P ' identify becomes accessible to further y the soil conditions. PROCEDM Cave two (2) soil test holes were drilled at a y g B reement with Mr. this tine. Ttie field work was pe rformed on November 28, 1986 using a truck- • were advanced with 3V i . d . meted CE drill unit . The test holes ' hollow which act as a casing to X 7 0.d. continuous flight ight h stem augers, prevent collapse of the sides of the hole. Standard penetration tests auger ti were performed ortned in advance of g P at 2 to 5 foot intervals of depth, • in ASTM D -1586. Periodic observations in accordance with procedures designated for groundwater levels in the to st holes were trade while drilling and after Cocnplet ion . • our laboratory, for examination All soil samples obtained were brought too and classification. The • samples will be retained for a period of at least ' ill be sue of this report, after which they w 9C days from the date of is discarded unless we are otherwise notified. showing .Drawing No-1 is a site the soil test hole locations. ' Detailed .soil descriptions together with a p lot of the standard penetration append letters Borehole s. The capital r foot are given on the appe .test blows . pe g . in appropriate rou symbols of the Unified letters parentheses represent the g P Pa • A chart explaining this system is appended. Soil Classification System. P SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. n 8 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 3 All elevations in this report are to geodetic datum, and were obtained using the bench mark noted on the site plan. SITE AND CBDIXY The property under investigation lies directly southeast of the intersection of East la nteur Avenue and � t Road in Maplewood , mesota• This is within the h si r Cities p y og aphis area known as the �n.n formation., that is characterized b irr e g ular surf y g ace topography and heterogeneous soil types. The Client indicates the site is roll to hilly. The maximum difference in surface elevation within the site is a roximat pp ely 32 feet, between the high point at the northeast corner elev. 1 ' C 048.5 � , and the low points at three individual de ressional ndin r P po g areas near the southwest corner, in the middle, and in the north - central rtions of t ' po he site (elev. 1016' 1017'). The major natural soil t in the area is sandy ' ' type dy glacial till related to the Superior ice lobe of the Wisconsin glaciation. After this soil was formed it was subsequently overridden b the ' � y y later Des Moines ice sheet, and thus was we ll consolidated. ida ted . The Des Moines ice sheet left _ a thin, discontinuous covering f silt and clayey soils, g y a YY A covering of topsoil developed in post-glacial times. In Pe p g low -lying areas with no positive drainage outlets,-deposits sits of t and ' g po pea organic soils have formed. . Some fill has been placed over portions of the ro rt P Pe . Y SOIL CONDITIONS Four basic soil types were encountered in our investigation. These are fill; topsoil; peat; and Superior sand g lacial till. Thin surf ace Y g patches of Des Moines clayey glacial till may also occur on the site, ,but were not encountered in our 2 relimina borings, P Y`y ®I low ow SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. M MINNESOTA 4 Fill Fill containing building debris has been dumped in the area directly south of larpenteur Ave., encompassing hole 2. At our boring location the fill is 6' thick. It consists of 1' of dark brown sand clay fill., l l Y Y , underlain by sand fill containing building debris. This fill was not ng ng compacted when it was placed, and is loose. 'Furthermore it was laced directl y over Wit, without its prior removal. The fill is unsuitable for foundation or floor slab sup port, Topsoi Test hole 1 is in a natural unfilled area. At this location there is a lk' , thick topsoil layer, which consists of black organic sand silt g Y containing roots . The topsoil is unsuitable for floor slab or foundation support or as a subgrade in pavement areas, due to its low load ca p a city and � Pa Y potentially high ty compressibility. This soil t should be re -used in landscape areas or as non - structural fill. I Peat Underlying the fill in TH -2 is a 3' thickness of black well decomposed peat. The peat extends between the 6 to 9 foot depths below the present fill surface. The peat is wet, s and ve ry soft in consistent P��Y rY . Y The peat is potentially highly compressible and has very low load bearing capacity. It is totally unsuitable for floor slab or foundation support, or as a subgrade below pavements. Superior Sandy Glacial Till u The major natural soil t at this site caamences directl below type y the t or topsoil, at depths of 1.5' to 9' below P� P p ground surface, and extends beyond the terminal depths of the borings, SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. �` 10 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 6 W, . This soil formation consists mainly f cl ' y y y f ine to medium sand with traces of gravel, with random thin lease s of clean sand and grey clayey i It The major clayey sand component of this soi 1 is non 1 - p as t lc , the grey clayey silt has medium . lasticit P y Standard penetration test resistances in the Superior glacial till range from 14 to 3 blows per foot.' "It is mainly in a median dense condition, and the low blow counts are due to soil disturbance when sampling below the water table. The Superior sandy glacial till has moderate bearing capacity and .very low compressibility, and is a good foundation subsoil. It also has very good compaction characteristics when used as fill. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Weasurements of groundwater levels and ice levels of ds in low�l pon areas were made by Subterranean Engineer personnel. On November ember 28,1986 the water levels were: UXATION D O: BE UM GRADE -( f t) TH-i tk TH 6 Rtd in Rxtim Ind in S.E. q�ec�arit GROUNDWATQt ELEVATION - (ft) 1014.7 1017.1 1017.3 1017.7 The recorded water levels at this site represent a perched condition P Pe dition wherein downward rcolati surface w aters Pe ng are retarded from downward percolation by relatively impervious soil layers be �� y law. Groundwater inf iltra- ton into shallow excavations during development should ng pme be relatively small in quantity and could be handled b g ravity ' y g y dra inage or pumping f ran a s ump . Excavations near existing on: - site ds would init i ail ' p y experience greater groundwater infiltration until some d dra inage occur P� g SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. MINNEAPOLI3 MINNESOTA 3 � REVEMPMENr PLANS It is proposed to construct a residential subdivision • on at this site, consistin ' of s famil dwellin internal g y dwelli along with the necessary „'roadways and underground utility 1 it lines. . t g y S tructures of the type proposed are one to twos for ies in height, with mason bear in ' , masonry g walls to first floor level or outside grade, and wood frame construction above. Structural loads on the footings are relatively iight, A definite grading /development plan for this p property has p pe y not yet been designed HUD - r11tt 1 W U1 n � • 1'S We unders t:and that this ro' ect: p will be f it�ae� - ed by the U.S. De pa r Lmen t of Housing and Urban lleve to nen t - Federal lious1 Administration, Illy - llUll Data. Skeet) " 9G entitled Laced Ueve lolxnetlt Witit Controlled Carttwrk" requires a Soil � to � ti a- t1 g i uee r ana lyze acid i fie Laves t i g ons and laboratory tests , re are soils ens icy • � p g ee r i��g reco»net�d� t �ocls , and observe and test tl ce rad in cons t *' , g g ruction work for any subdivision wbictt ltas foot oci Ii11 or if g the depW benea tit house or a ra a floor s g g labs exceeds those 'a l lowed b the Minim " Y " �u» Propert t S tac�da rd . In addition, , wl1et1 ttie project t Gc�p � ad lleve lorm»en t Plans are co» le ted a ' 1 0t - by - Lot Tabu la t ion" of existing a leva t ' g ions , proposed surface, slab and loot . • , ground water data, sate an es t i.��ia ted elevation . of suitable �d foviatioai suns -oils will be .. required in order to de to rini«e rl1e applicabil.it Of to Sly Y • eet 79G for each lot. Based ' on lire above data � - _ tine applicability of 111A 11UD Data Sheet 79C can be es tablished for each of the sub' - . ,1 l lots assessment is preluninary. Ilse fina a • p l ica b i 1 i l: y of Data S 1I lccet 79G should be de te rmined ac -- - Lot a WL by basis during eart o i peratiotis. goo . SUBTERRANEAN -- ENGINEERING CORP. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 7 .1 M)en ea operations ccxnuence in order to (urllier meet ltie requ o f- F11A - IIUD 1Jala Sly eet 79G, a qualified Soil ruigineer should: 1. Obse ttie base of excava L ions prior to fill p lacemeciL . Z. Qieck ot1 Llie amount of overs izin of excava ' lines . g ions beyond buil ld ic�g 3. observe Llie type of fill and its iieLbod of lacer �t p sec 4. Take field density Les Ls of each fill ' ope ra L ion layer duric�g Lt�e eart.t�woric S. Check Lh the basement slabs and Lhe roue w b g d ater level are se��arated y a distance of a t leas L 4 feel: . 6. 1'rov isle • eta inee r i« cogs � - .. • • 1LaLion, and observaLioc) and LesLic� st�f f icieciL • (jLf g g to state to warracl Ll is l• fill areas were graded in su � ' . g bs �ac�tial accordance wl Lli L! ie s pec i f ica L ions . 7. Sublui a repor sunnia rizic� L!� • g e results of the observation acid testis services at the conclu i.oci of radio .. g ANALYSIS AND REO"ffMATIONS . Based on our preliminary data, the soil conditions at this site appear to be satisfactory for a development of the type proposed. However, some oil correction work will be necessary in order to remove fill and upper PPe organic soils, and to dens ify loose or sof t zones exposed during earthwork opera tons... .: Although sane additional soil borings are recommended, it presently appears that there are no deep peat pockets outside of the three P resent pounding areas on the site. All obviously organic soil and fill should be removed from the building y g pads and appropriate oversizing strips. The exposed subgrade should be inspected by a qualified Soil ineer prior to fill and /or construction, � P If soft or loose sail zones are detected, they should either be additionally subcut, or thoroughly surface canpaeted, � .., r.., WON �•�•' SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. MINNEAPOLI3 MINNESOTA As indicated by our two test holes, the depths to suitable soils and corresponding elevations are: IDCATION DEPTM TO SUITABLE SOILS APEFCOCTE II.E CF E (feet) (feet) TH-1 A 1017.7 Tai -2 9 1014 The excavations should be oversized beyond the footing lines by a rninity m horizontal distance of 1 foot for each foot of vertical cut, or 6 feet whichever is greater. Excavations below elevation 1018 feet may encounter groundwater intrusion from perched groundwater lenses, or from adjacent ponds, and provision should be made for dewater ing . Fill necessary to reach design subgrade should be an approved inorganic soil, free of any foreign material or debris. It should be spread in loose lifts limited to 8" in thickness, moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90% Maximum Modified Proctor Dry Density, ASIM D -1557 and an overall average value of at least 92% Modified Proctor Dry Density. The upper 6 of the exposed pads below slab -on -grade including garage slabs, should be compacted to achieve at least 95% Maximum Modified Proctor Dry Density. The proposed buildings may be supported upon conventional, relatively shallow spread footing foundations founded on approved compacted .fill, or on approved natural inorganic soils. In cut areas, soft zones encountered duri ng grading should be surface compacted, or subcut and replaced with controlled fill. Where the natural sandy till or medium dense sand occur at footing grade, conventional relatively shallow spread footing foundations may be based directly on these soils. A net allowable soil bearing pressure of up to 2000 pounds per square foot may be used for the footing designs throughout 14 SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. MINNEAPOLI3 MINNESOTA if loose sands are exposed at footing grade, additional compaction is necessary to de y nsif the sand. The sand should be appropriately dewatered as necessary, and then compacted to achieve at least 92% Maximum Modified Proctor Dry Density, ASTM D . All Pe rmrne ter f oot i nS s in heated portions of the buildings must be ' o u tside finished grade for frost protection purposes. a nuns of 3 b elow ou sid g P Perimeter footings portions ti s in unheated such as the outside garage walls t least 4' below outside ings under should be a rade. Continuous strip foot S bearing ari walls should be at least 18" wide, for practical reasons. The clayey or sil soil lenses underlying portions of this site impervious and do not permit are relatively �mpe Pe good vertical. drainage of surface S in f ct created a rched waters . They have a perched groundwater condition. Therefore, S it is recamnended that a perimeter tile drain system should be installed in this develo around subgrade levels of all - buildin g s Pment , to avoid potential futu re p dames or problems with dampness groundwater intrusion into the basements. The site should be Sr aded to provide positive drainage of runoff away from the buildings in all directions. The fine - rained sand soils containing varying amounts of silt may g Y To inhibit potential problems due to seasonal freeze - be frost susceptible. p►o P tha w cycles. all exterior items that are not structurally supported including y ' ewalks a do slabs, etc. should be structurally independent sid � garage e S aprons, Pa of the buildings, and unrestrained in their movement. If grading is to take place during the winter months, prudent cold S � weather construction procedures should be followed. These include 1 imi t ing t workable dimensions and the size of excavations o protecting intermediate P cover of loose soil or ha layers of structural fill with a ng Y bales during off- hours to prevent ground freezing. ,.goii►' * www7 r7v%" SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 10 Dr iveways and Roadway Pavements Organic soils and fill material remaining below driveway and roadway areas should referabl be stripped, removed and replaced with approved � y ill. However in driveway areas on some buried organic soils compacted f Y Y lace provided that-they may remain in place, P Y are covered with at least 3V of -compa granular fill. The base of the excavation, and all subbase and course fill, should be compacted to a aainMUM of 95% Maxima Modif ied base cou amps Proc for Dry De it , ASTM D -1557 . Convent Tonal vement designs may be used above such a prepared subgrade . Pa � GENERAL The soil conditions have been established at our specific test hole locations only. Conditions between and around the borings are likely to vary, i or and extrapolation of the results is not warranted. p ' bori s.are recommended Additional soil ng , to better define the soil conditions. around the pond margins. During construction, all excavations, earthwork, fill placement and compaction, ion , and foundation i should be monitored and tested soil E We would be by a qual �.f red Eng leased to provide the necessary P f engineering f ield a ineer' observation and testing services. tions contained in this report are necessarily prelioainary �e recommends Po on the results of only two soil borings. We would in nature, and are based Y p lanning for this project progresses* to consult with y ou further as be pleased y P :•.1V1:rV:.: -.. To SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. MINNEAPOLI3t MINNESOTA SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING CORP. x 17 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA d ~8ENCH MARK: ELEVz 1023.7 TROP OF HYDRANT NW QUADRANT. E,, LARPENTEUR AVE., I !1 .49 O t� Z x v • TH.2 ELEV. = 102 .1� * T. ICE LEV.= 1017.3 1 11 /28 / 86 : 'r H/i EL EV 1019.2 . P • ICE ELEV, =1018, 11/28/86 o • 1 SU B T ERRANEA N EN CO SOIL INVESTIGATION HOUSING SUBDIVISION MAPLEWOOD I MN. REVISIONS FOR: ED CAVE 1% SONS INC. NO. DATt •Y ' DRAWN By M •CALL 1 «= 100 Joe. "o. 8624 18 1 CNK'D RWA OAT[ 12-2-8 DRAWING NO. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Ken FROM: Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Revision and Variances LOCATION: Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road . APPLICANT/OWNER : Ed Cave and Sohs , Inca PROJECT: Woods and Ponds (formerly Cave's Currie Street Addition) DATE: July 24 1989 SUMMARY 1rTRODUCTI0N The applicant is requesting the following: ' 1. A revision to an approved preliminary plat (Cave's Currie Street Addition) to increase the number of lots by four to create atotal of 19 single-family home sites. 2~ Variances to the zoning code to allow the construction of three single-family dwellings within the required rear-yard BACKGROUND The City Council approved Cave's Currie Street Addition preliminary plat, -for- 15 single-family lots on July 13, 1987, subject to seven conditions, On July 11 1988, the City Council proved a one-year time extension of 'the preliminary plat approval. DISCUSSION There are three issues with this plat: changes in wetlands, loss of trees, and additional lots" There are two wetlands on this site labeled "A" and "B" on the grading plan on page 12. Wetland A would be filled. Wetland B would be excavated to provide the capacity required in the City's drainage plan. The.environmental protection ordinance requires preservation of wetlands where they are needed to meet the City's drainage plan or for water quality treatment. Pond A is not needed for either purpose. Pond B will provide for storm water drainage needs and the Soil Conservation Service feels that Pond /A 'has little value for water-quality treatment. (Refer to the report from Schilling Environmental Consultants on page 14.) Excavation of Pond B will probably improve the water quality over the way it is now with two ponds. 19 Attachment 3 Tree Preservat i on In edd1tion to the issues with the ponds on the site, tree t s vation is a concern with the development of this proper t\/ pre erl The revised plat appears to have considered where trees as are " he site and should have as. small as possible impact on �r� on �� t There those that remain on the property. will be trees lost on f the site but careful Lots One and Two 1n the northwest corner cz specific lots grading and attention to site planning on these spec .c ' minimize the impacts of construction on the trees. ' The major change between the approved preliminary plat and the sed plan is t''= . addition of four single-family home lots" propo proposed for the area between McKnight The additional lots are bin� them front on Larpenteur A«enue Road and Currie Street y having ed meet City == 'nd McKnight Road. All of the lots as proposed anda� ds for street frontage and total 1 o area Lots d shown on the proposed s , 7 an 12 ' Block One ' as plat are ~'--' - proposed unique � i'' --''` --' f��ur. ion" City Code requires a rear yard setback t twenty percent ��»� �r single glfamily lots which is equal to a t least for homes on) t�°= lot depth" The housepads for these three tpreliminary grading and u tility plan do not lots as shownbac ��nk ne p These lots could meet the rear yard setback requirement meet this set requirement. if tne front of the house (facing McKnight Road) is constructed nearly next to the pond" This site lit�l usable front yard on each design, however, would leave r e f the site, staff recommends lot Due to the unique conditions o v t b ranted � �o the re e g that a variance z ar yard setback requirement that a 20_foot minimum setback from for Lot 7, Block One suc attachments Lots 8 and 9 be maintained when a house or any variance to the t ucted Additionally a � -�o thereto are constructed. for Lots 6 and 12 Block One, is rear yard setback requirement - to within 35 feet of recommended so that homes ma. be constructed d "' T u th«�rear property line" o ensure that these minimum rear yar d ble deed restriction for Lots 6, 7, and setbacks are maintained, ahou/o recordable submitted to the City as a 12, Block One, s �n u condition of final plat approval* Lots 6 and 7 Block One, would be double frontage lots as they t t frontage on both McKnight Road and the proposeo have s reer / fronS Section 30�8 (f) (6) of the City Code states that Currie Str�et~ ec itted except where "double frontage lots shall not be perm subdividing otherwise topographic or other conditions render su v has been The double frontage lot arrangement unreasonable." so that driveway access to these two proposed by the applicant St t not from McKnight Road" This lots would be from Currie Street, f ot wide strip of land alternative, however, creates a �� - o - Th e between Lots 5 and 8 of Block One For a common driveways hat 1 as shown does minimize the amount of driveway pavement c poan woul be required as the driving surface would be about 60 feet 20 shorter than would a driveway to McKnight Road. The Assistant CityEngineer recommends that the driveway for Lots 6 and 7, B1ock`One, be constructed as shown on the grading plan because: 1s Poor soils exist in the pond (which cause construction and stability concerns with the 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer under the driveway); . 2. The need to install a culvert under the driveway is avoided; :and 3. It minimizes the number of access points to McKnight Road. Based on the above analysis and the site conditions, it appears that the double-frontacge lots as proposed are warranted,, All driveways that are over 150 feet in length (Lots 6, 7 and 12, Block One) are required by the Uniform Fire Code to have a minimum of 12 Feet of paved surface with a minimum of a five-ton RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve Cave's Woods and Ponds Addition preliminary plat (plans stamped April 10, 1989), subject to the following c.onditions being met before final plat approvalx a. The plat shall be revised as illustrated on the map on page 11 to include the following: (1) The drainage and utility easement between Lots 6 and 7 and Lots 5 and B. of Block One shall be revised to include access in its description. (To al Iow for its use for the driveways.) b. An opinion shall be submitted by a certified soils expert which describes the soil correction procedure(s) necessary to prepare the areas proposed as building sites +or Lots 1, 2 and 3 o Block One. These procedures shall be included in the developer's c. The final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be approved by the City'Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: (1) A proposed building pad elevation and contour in-formation for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. ' Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, 21 provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. (2) The location of the four-inch and larger diameter trees to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan. The location and type of trees to be replanted (Condition e.) shall be shown in the grading plan. (3) The minimum distance between the building pads for Lots 6 and 12, Block One and the west (rear) property lines of Lots 5 10 and 11, Block One shall be dimensioned as thirty-five (35) feet on the grading plan. (4) The minimum distance between the building pad for Lot 7, Block One and the west (rear) property .I ines of Lots B and 9, Block One shall be dimensioned at twenty (20) feet on the grading plan. (5) In the grading plan, show the location of the driveway for Lot 13, Block One, including the area +or the re turn-arClUnd. (6) The grading plan shall maximize preservation of the hill and trees on Lot One, Block Two, as much as possible. (7) The use of a temporary rock entrance pad during construct ion d. Submittal to the City a 100-foot-diameter easement for the temporary cul-de-sac for the Currie Street right- 0+ -wa at e Submittal of a signed developer's agreement to the City Engineer with the required surety for all public, street, ponding and utility improvements required for this development. This agreement shall also guarantee: (1) That trees will be planted to comply with Section 9-191 (5) (b) of the environmental protection ordinance. (2) That the prescribed soil correction procedure(s) in Condition b. (above) will be followed. (3) Construction of driveway tmrn-arOUnds for Lots 1, 2 3 12 and 13, ]Block One. (4) Construction of driveways for Lots 6, 7 and 12, Block One, that comply with the requirements of Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. 22 (5) Construction of the temporary Currie Street cLtl- de-sac . f. Submittal of a recordable covenant to the Director of Community Development that restricts the driveway access to Lots 6 and 7, Block One, to Currie Street, 2. Approve the resolution on page 17 for a variance to Section 36-72 (a) of the City Code to allow the construction of a «single-family dwelling and its attachments for Lot 7 Block One, up to 20 feet from Lots 8 or 9 and for the construction of homes on _Lots 6 and 12, Block One, up to 35 feet from the :rear property line. 23 REFERENCE Site Description Area Size: 9.97 acres Existing land use: undeveloped Prom natural features: two wetl ands and numerous large aak trees- Onesmallwetlandwouldbefilledandthelarger one would be improved. The majority of the trees near the wetlands wouY'd be retained. .Surroundin land uses North: Laroenteur Avenue and a single-dwelling property (2300 Larpenteur Avenue) shown as the exception on the proposed plat. The applicant has indicated to staff that they now own this P roperty and intended to make some improvements to it. Across \~»arpenteur Avenue is Hillside Center. East: Four single dwellings on deep (300 feet) lots South: A single dwelling (1600 McKnight Road) on s 132 x 595- foot parcel West: McKnight Road. Across the street is Hill crest Country Cl ub. P-ast Actions 2-.16-78: The City Council denied arequest from the property owner at 2300 McKnight Road to create a 75-foot-wide lot, Council required at least 100 feet of width on McKnight Road to ensure a proper width corner lot at such time that a street would be constructed along the east property line. A lot division was approved for the property at 1540 McKnight Road. The lot split was conditioned upon a deed restriction . being recorded to run with the 100 x 150-foot parcel that stated .when an interior street is constructed (along the south property linnm) the driveway access to McKnight Road shall be located to the interior street." See the concept plan on page 9. Re 1:0 Section 9-191 (c) states that: "Filling shall not cause the natural nutrient stripping capacit of the wetland to fall below the nutrient 24 production of the wetland watershed for its projected 2a Section 9-192 (a) states that : "Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of healthy trees. This requirement shall not apply to diseased trees or where a forester certifies that thinning is needed for the overall health of s wood|ot; in which case, a specific tree removal plan must be approved by the City." Th�r�cr��c��d� the submitted The four-acre-foot storm p as shown on plans is in conformance with the City's drainage plan. (See the map on page 13)" Ramse Count Hi Elepartment McKnight Road is a 40-mph, four-lane roadway with an off-street trail along its west side. It is recommended that driveway turn- arounds be constructed for Lots 12 and 13, Block One, to eliminate the need to back a vehicle onto the roadway. Public Safe l, Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code requires afive-ton, all -weather, 12-foot-wide access roadway to be avail ableto within 150 feet of the farthest portion of every building unless the building is sprinklered. The house proposed on Lot 12, Block One would be at least 180 feet from the McKnight Road surface. The houses proposed on Lots 6 and 7, Block One, would be at least 220 feet from the Currie Street road surface. - 2~ A Wil1iams Brothers Pipeline is 16 feet north of Lot One, Block Two, running parallel to Larpenteur Avenue. ['ARMCPP.MEM jl Attachments 1. |Location Map 2 Property Line and Future Street Concept Mao 3^ 1987 Preliminary Plat 4^ 1989 Proposed Preliminary Plat 58 Grading and Utility Plan 6~ Drainage Plan Excerpt 7. 'Report: Schilling Environmental Consultants, Inc. a, Variance Resolution 25 !• .. F 1 �tt9 aws IN t /trttlt /111211 t 11� t111 tttltt t / /tti1t11t1 Ittltij /t11t 1 s RZ R2 �.,, Y ��,��Ittt11� R v so .00 r r 00 • t . so ... • .. � .r i �' � 111 / r r • ) w .. r I� w ~ 1t /riI /� ittiltttt/ /t //11�r� ;�IIIt /1h �ttt1 /1111 11 1111/ 1% Itilt�It11 /ttttr•1111111ue -� a �' r • r R 3' - • w .. L B. - .. s r _ w • .• w t e ; R : ` P V D ... r (� �IrIltlrtir /111 /1 /rti /Irr Ili 1� /fiitlirl// r1 1 tt 1 / /1 /t�f /Ii� /i/ / //if /i1 1 i /l1t /fa11t /It1tt / t11�j; . . F r i .�:•::;:::;:; R w w'F r 2 w r i - w - X111 /It /i �1� ' ,��i' I `i 4 0 N ' 11111!' : �.� ,. M Z t / :111 , • - ,�� `111� 1111 /IIr" s R3 0 0 0 w R 3 (,1 M I PW 0 u • r A Y E j te : R _ R c ., too Con F -I D IM R 2 �� N C on r •• C V01 1 ) *� 3 w to R { • l �� • r� •111111Ir111��It - .. go E an 1 14 LBC- r .. .. 11111/t. •• ; � " - R w s .rte • • R2 r . w f - • r ,• - w r 9 6 ,� N _ r �a� � • � fi w •. _ r r - • s w R TA . •� It1111t111i1 .r I gill BC w w r r . R 3 -Mom ' - BC - • a v•� = ��i ••..h 1 w LBC l v 04 it toA AV • 7� 1 1(� _ ..111 /1111 /1 / /1ttltt /11 /11� 11111111/11 tlii R3t B C ) .. LOCATION MAP N 26 Attachment 1 f 0 20 1 .. ..... -�f �+ • �Y f a.•w.i _ �.• •.r • w...+ Ott N.9h.681 r • _._..�— tpEh-TEUR __._.._a,.-......r.- I�S. 57' d >D r 99.76' 47 V S) g• �_ 1 i • •�•• •• •. ♦.•.. •IY1 340 0 L 0�1 (Z lie � - r l` :� ..: :: = tip:: +::••• :• �:• :. •:•: ' ' �::� :�::; ; ; ....; ::�•::• � :: ; i i _ -;••/ .':: i i : • • � �•: • i •: ai ; .�i :i :•••i �If. �i : • : • i • •:• : :. � •� • ••• . ••:.- t . .. ••Y•ON �•;;•�� - • • s• : : : : :. s� : : : ;• : • :: •• :: i : : : : :..' � !". W, �t OEM 2� IrA77 y , 4 0 .3 ........... x 1022.0 9 9 -qtv ( Cr ' .': 4 d(2-3) .'p: �� ate' •a. •. f, hf, • .,.f..h'i ::: :fh ":•':f•Y•f••r,• • •:♦•1•r •♦•••••• 1♦••1•• •..�.► ♦• •: .. • i % �••�.. ii - � ';•: ;i :: iii i� : :•• • : : • • • • • •;•; ;, :: • •��•.. • •' •' �iTw� T � • i: • . •i - • ••: -/: • • •:. i�: '•- : r i a • i s a - iTrs; ti•:. � f . •� J.G C' 2 •• •.;• ... •; � • • : • a� :•::: •• :: • : :: • •: • :.Ala •; • • • • • . • • f • • • • .,•��: :.; • ♦ 000� •.f• ;.•• •a• •• • ' �• S ��. J 3 40o 40000 • •. • •; a • ;:111•• •I r• •; . 6 _ 07 t •.. -Wx ..�- 4 tj x r1 2 C 6 0) ~ 0 4) t d1b { 1 l 0.2 { 5 .O 5' 104 % 7 o _ _ J7 OI o 0 C Lit - S (z 215 9.99' • x 1 Q 10'� o 8 ; �•� 103 '. r • • /� t /� } . I 1 � s � w T • • 0 0 `-�, • ,� 1 x i (A %5 m a 9 2 o a ' • • 1028 1 t . ► ` a fit„ 6Lr 1 .� • w ,� . • j. oho „_ • e o V4 5 / o 11 7.0 ` �: :. 7� •• p /oo too ��.�0 120• 7. Ly 14tv s o 0 1E w - "5 " $� a -� , 1 2 - Cs) +' �-� *� Z 3 7) G� ' X46} �'� .~, C �cr P4 3� <2 • 3 6. r . ,- ►7 O o loo It w ti •� 5; 4 15 F -3m 1 P 0 2 _ AV E • �s 7i motai i • C ONDO INt u N1 PROPERTY LINE AND FUTURE STREET CONCEPT MAP ....... Applicant's Site 27 Attachment 2 r� • hK N f► Set s 4, t 1 t A u .. .. .[AST 6S ft••— . • LARPENTEUR p boo W from a 100 -foot, setback pipplirif= l 0e, Ns, z _ + . .L Ln •�` s t r• s3 . i Ia 3 � OUTLOT 8 I 2 Ln 3 . to — -- w �. �-• — -- -- -� cr- x ' 7 Ln o� - -. --- �t�. ot•-- w &J AO,w w ( am, .. Lac IV bvw N I r' N K• wr M M "L i1 Cave's Currie Street Addition Preliminary Plat (As approved '7- 13 -87) 28 ,r • r Attachment 3 Q N WOODS 8 PONDS PRELIMINARY PLAT M irfrvt � f • •..618 K••• 1. ast 1 i i i i v a rj . t s I , i ;s s 9� OWNER- ---- l•A RP ENT EUR —= • -- AVENUE IM ITVCV 1 .. •o as 60016ww.t C **toot t" goes its feet of too wool �� ; t'• f»t of tM O+?t• see foot oil to totttvift ff. I •�•�: ' •.�. :. 1 a++.w w+tlfr trot twlo to. t oowtAe.tto. w . •. _ •• .. 1. .. •.•..� ar •rt f w 101V �Iat.t•* ►wt..•1•. -4 frot•w• tar•• W ♦ ►wr of tv •• ee M tl•ro«••s. r ................ t ...... •.....+. �. • .... *Iwo a. t• to MIDWEST t os • t l t I and Surveerort d Civil En jorwer�s, InC s • m u. - A_o t� •tt� 1 � t o - i - - weft %MMM �r •v o� me to I 1 2 3 • � _ I 2 • 2 c •. � �3�oO f/. t .: ♦ dun i1. t0.01 t 11. dM now • 1 _ i 3 X T 010o s1. � _ we • • • tr000 S1. 4 sJ U. �••••••� • mat• fWt.�I/t � • J to V bin L. ..... .,...... Gs 12 • 13 - OlsOO sl, tam V. b�•o v. o f .�• ..r t mat, S a' as S&L its v a rj . t s I , i ;s s 9� OWNER- ED CAVE B SONS. 94C. IM ITVCV 1%* u.. tt. of 9wor of t •. PoftA••ot Ove o f the "SCVkLL SMA SMu 60016ww.t C **toot t" goes its feet of too wool �� ; t'• f»t of tM O+?t• see foot oil to totttvift ff. t.•..•ta !�. two ». soveor tr..tt, wl••.•�t�. •�•�: ' •.�. :. 1 a++.w w+tlfr trot twlo to. t oowtAe.tto. w . •. _ •• .. 1. .. •.•..� ar •rt f w 101V �Iat.t•* ►wt..•1•. -4 frot•w• tar•• W ♦ ►wr of tv •• ee M tl•ro«••s. r ................ t ...... •.....+. �. • .... *Iwo a. t• to MIDWEST t os • t l t I and Surveerort d Civil En jorwer�s, InC s • m u. - A_o t� •tt� 1 � t o - i - - weft %MMM �r •v o� me to 29 Attachment 4 WOODS 8 PONDS PRELIMINARY GRADING 8 UTIi�I Y ALAN ••• •'J• w• +••• • -• IARPENTEVR �� VENVE. "Wawas t —; p• is ar _L w sell • w o Mr 100 a t •�•• t Wye. t• / rte. d. •�. ... .... , r •-- •. •_. �� •— , df r •� • r• • Imo• .r...�.r • I / •' /� • r - '.�.��'7 r appofto 4M4 ' VOW • I e .•r- wa fill C ej 0 • • 1 r ( O • (I 1 I 1A ... •►. ti �� r�i 1' 1 •l • Q Q �� ,�•• 00 0aft . roc ..., •... .... ..': 'w -- Au Law • .... . \ �� ' —_ • • • � ► • � 'mss • r �,. V • — •— •. .• I. :: r • O ' / so MEMMUM �- - a+' • ` 6. Ae i t • •• � `y � , . ! � .... •..• . fir of ♦ _ � • . I• •.Jj M � � ' • y .v ., — • 1 •ter• .. •:. — .. -- l+1t Ail j • ' . a--- �.1 .•?{ me. ' MISS W IV • qTr owe f was*ti �.. _ • �• r v ; 1, •� 1 WdV yr PR" r. t •. • i W • t • t f 01.A .. • .., • �+ 4r4 .... .. t 1 1 wgur )IPl ••lp" 0 4.4.40 0 *.w•1 ►+w*•• •r• Omega. Tse• will • •-* •• w w o* tt•+• •• 1 7"V o D CONT �t a vrr *t r°nt row r w I &" w.. . 1.1 • • T*H c P+ 1 OVR -- �. 11041460T •w+w 9"11 t•+ i •�� / • � •� g • M • •• • 14 ► >i l • t •[ t w l t ralw a• ti K VM • t f . t•w V10 119 / •. • 1%,V% • r •• t • t 040"#. • VT i my t WT • • f• 011 01 04.4 W a**** ••* l / of 006404 60 M w► [ R TO'T• pv"t• N 81016I,11 fwl b/tS w 19 4"•t160 •l1 e". �. & t f &" •+.im+ 00 0041 4/ . "aq, fora • 0.9 K911 apra r 1TtrRg • 9 to rt79 owl •rta • 9.91 ats 2"(10 ,1 Tvt• • l two's- l is • t C3" w ftw%xw " IN k I V16 U/ fi 113 V21111111 use za 0'4��Sr 315�-rs fpR vw-ww=�� rkw11y)L'011-n R E Iq e RD . 6 crenc -e J. 30 Attachment 5 10 0 M� 0 404,, * oo"�rA � :� ..; . � tip:.;. 'i•;l :.i'yti.i. � J '•' N ., .. a Yrt acv v MAJOR WATERSHED DIVIDE INTERIOR WATERSHED WATERSHED DIVIDES — PROPOSED STORM SEWER 4 2" EXISTING STORM SEWER - - - -- am. — OPEN CHANNEL STORM WATER STORAGE AREA INUNDATION AREA STORAGE AREA VOLUME 4 AF DISCHARGE IN CFS CITY LIMITS ••••••••••......•• ............ .... ..............:.... MAPL DRAINAGE PLAN 31 Attachment 6 4 N 0 *U'r 8 1989 Schilling Consultants, Inc. 2785 White Bear Avenue, Suite 210 • Maplewood, MN 55109 • (612) 777 -6606 .Februa ry .2 5, 19 8 9 Mr. Sam Cave, President Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. 2301 :Woodbridge Street Roseville, Minnesota 55113 RE: Preliminary Plat, CAVES CURRIE ADDITION :Dear Mr. Cave: in response to our meeting of February 20, 1989 I have reviewed the preliminary plat of the CAVES CURRIE ADDITION with respect to wetland impacts /mitigation and s ormwater requirements /treatment. The following comments and recommendations are presented as a result of these analyses. WETLANDS _MANAGEMENT There are three (3) wetlands on this nine (9) acre residential site. Outlot A is a 0.5 acre, Type II /III (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Circular 39) wetland. Outlot B is a 1.3 acre, Type II /III wetland along the east side of McKnight Road and - southeast of its intersection with Larpenteur Avenue. There is a small 0.2 acre, Type II /III wetland approximately 150 feet east of the south half of outlot B. It is my understanding that the presently approved preliminary plat is being revised to include additional residential lots which may significantly impact Outlot A. I have discussed the present status of the Outlot A wetland and this proposal with Mr. Tom Petersen, Conservation Manager - Ramsey Soil & Water Conservation District on :February 22nd. It was his opinion that this wetland has little value for water quality treatment. Also, from a wetland habitat perspective, its small size and A mmediate proximity to Larpenteur Avenue lessens its importance.. However., Mr. Petersen emphasized that the governing board of RSWCD has.a policy of discouraging -.any wetland elimination, regardless of size. I am in gemeral agreement with Mr. Petersen. In addition, there are apparently no existing or planned stormsewers which enter the Outlot A wetland. Therefore, its value for stormwater treatment is nonexistent, however, it has value as do all wetlands for purposes of groundwater recharge. Outlot A's wetland habitat value has to considered low from the perspective of closeness to a busy street and surrounding existing and planned residential hones. Some filling along Larpenteur Avenue with tree planting would be desirable to provide a buffer against the' street. The loss of the 0.2 acre wetland east of Outlot B is unavoidable with the approved preliminary plat layout. The Outlot B wetland was originally meandered with a small area immediately west of McKnight Road. The recent widening and improvements to McKnight Road resulted in an .additional loss of about 15 % of the'-Outlot B wetland to its current surface area. today this wetland is heavily infested with a useless wetland invader called: Purple 'Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria, L.) [personal communication: Mr. Cliff Aichinger, Administrator, Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District] . 32 Attachment 7 i SKr . Cave 890225 page 2 In addition, historical photos appear to indicate a inf illing of the wet land's open water area, presumbably from off -site sedimentation sources. Excavation of selected areas of this wetland would likely have benefits, WATER MANAGEMENT The City of Maplewood comprehensive stormwater management plan requires the storage of 4.0 acre -feet within Outlot B. Planimetric volume determinations based the existing two -foot contour map (Preliminary grading and utility plan, Midwest .Landsurveyors, 871030) indicate a present storage, at most, of 3.18 acre-feet: _CO= OUR ELEVATION AREA VOLUME Al 1019 (assumed 100 yr.) 1.52 acres - - A2 1018 1.39 if 1.45 acre -feet A3 1017(approximate) 0.80 it 1.08 " if A4 1016 0.15 " 0_65!', if Total: 3.18 acre -feet Extensive excavation of the Outlot B wetland is proposed for the following reasons: 1. Removal of historic offsite sedimentation. 2. Destruction of purple loosestrife population. 3. Recovery of required stormwater "live storage" (flood) of 4.0 acre-feet. 40 Addition of necessary stormwater "dead storage" for water quality treatment. For recovery of the Maplewood flood storage, it is proposed to excavate the pond to the 1016 elevation (1.25 acres) with 3:1 side slopes to the 1019 elevation. This would result in approximately 1,300 C.Y. of excavated material to be landspread around the proposed residential lots. The proposed stormwater water quality treatment follows U.S.E.P.A..Nationwide Urban Runoff Program criteria for "wet detention" pond design. C_ OUR ELEVATION AREA VOLUME A.5 1015.5 0.33 acres - - A6 1013.5 0.23 if 0. 5,6 acre -feet A7 1011.5 .0.19 if 0.42 " is Total: - 0.98 acre -feet The ":dead storage" provided is 115 % of the required target design and is based upon a contributing drainage area of approximately 10 acres, pervious SCS Curve No. 72 w* h an impervious fraction of 0.25. The excavation would result in approximately 1,600 C.Y. of material to be landspread around the proposed residential lots. Pond side slopes are based upon a 20 foot bench at 10:1 from 1015.5 to 1013.5 with 3:1 from 1013.5 to 1011.5. The permanent pool location is suggested to be located at the south end of Outlot B near the stormsewer inlets and far enough away from the proposed transverse sanitary sewer lateral. Pond design assumes a 20 year design .life for sedimentation. The enclosure is a sketch plan of the proposed improvements. 33 Mr Cave 890225 page 3 While the implemention of the above suggestions result in obvious wetland impacts, they must be balanced against both the habitat improvements on -site as well water quality protection to downstream water resources. In conclusion, the proposed improvements appear to clearly outweigh the impacts. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. S ince re l , a w oel G. Schilling Principal Enclosure cc: Mr. Lawrence Olson, Midwest Landsurveyors, Inc. Mr. Tom Petersen, RSWCD Mr. Jeff Olson, City of Maplewood Mr. Cliff Aichinger, RWMWD 34 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Maplewood City Council was duly called and held in the counccil chambers in said City on the day of , 1989 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The -following members were a WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. applied for a variance for the +ollowing-described propert Lots 6, 7, and 12, Block 1, Woods and Ponds Addition WHEREAS, Section 36.72 (a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum rear-yard setback equivalent to twenty percent (207.) of the lot depth (55 feet); WHEREAS,, 'the applicant is proposing a rear-yard setback of 20 feet requiring a variance of 35 feet on Lot 7 and a rear-yard setback of 35 feet requiring a variance of 20 feet on Lots 6 and 12. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on June 1 7, 1989. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on July 17, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood ' to consider this mailed pursuant to law. an opportunity to be he also considered reports Planning Commission, City Council held a public hearing on ` variance. Notice thereof was published and All persons present at said hearing were given ard and present written statements. The Council and recommendations of the City staff and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described variance be on the basis of the +ollowing findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to this propert 2. The granting of this variance will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Adopted this day of , 1989. Seconded by Ayes-- 35 STATE OF MINNESOTA � � COUNTY OF RAMSEY } SS. � CITY OF MAPLEWOOD � % the undersigned, being the dul y qua1ified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota do hereby certify that 'I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1989, with the original on file in aY office, and the same is a ful1 true and complete transcript therefrom inso+a\r as the same relates to Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal o+ the City this day of , 19890 Cit of Mapl ewood 36 PI anni.ng Commission Minutes 7 -17 .89 �6- All wood, snowmobiles, portable signs and miscel aneous junk shall be re / ved -from the sit prior to the sale of ehicles, There sh I be no exterior orage of t an p e r ou e 3e 0 r f e e sh 11 r t Ora v inoper\ablvehi.cles or par s of vehicles an o the propert 'n q uestion., except in a proved stora e /areas. ke As shown on t e attach d site plan, one hundred percen (100% opa screening shat I be provi ed ac oss the fronts of the storage areas a vi wed f rom White Bear Avenue. The sc e ing shal be subject to Cit staff rev ie and approval Screening around the remal er of the storage area shall be re d within sixt (60) da of the issuanc of a building permit for the propert mmedi tel y to the east of the site and shall e subject to Cit staff rev ie and app oval. is If an bU I ding remod I ing is to occur satisfac: ion of all re uirements of the Eau ildin Official and ire Marshal. me Submi tal to the Cit b the applicant evid nce that he has bee granted the I eg I right to' use the p k, ing area on the 6 e ,b i m d i n eg t h, a so th side of the park inpNgI r ot if it is to I b/used for the bod shop used car ales, 2a Aut orize an 11 stall reduction i the number of re off-street par[-..-ing sp es for the L 3 the , \e s b d shop, subject to reconsiderat on b the it in the future. Com issioner Sletten seconded A xdahl Barrett, Cardinal Fiol a, Fischer, Larson , Sigmundik, Sletten Ce Pre im inar Plat Revision: Woods and Ponds Ken Roberts, Asso Planner, presented the staff report for this re e preliminary plat revision to increase the number of I ots b four to create a total of 19 single-famil home sites and a variance 37 PI anning Commission -7- Minutes 7-17-89 to the zoning code to al I ow the construct ion of a singl e-+amil y dwel I ing within the re rear- - setback. Sam Cave, representing the applicant Ed Cave and Sons I Inc. . said he would I ike to have the Condition I . c. (3) changed from fift --five feet to thirt five feet for the minimum distance between the building pads for Lots 6 and 12, Block One and the west (rear) propert I ines of Lots 5, 10 and 11 Block One. Staff said this re change in setback woul re a variance. Mr. Cave also a I sked if Condition 1. e. (3) could be re at the time of issuance of a building permit rather than as a condition of approval of the preliminar plat. Staff said this re should be a condition of the preliminar plat to ensure that the drivewa turnarounds are installed. Mr. Cave asked staff whether this parcel had been considered for commercial development, since there is other comm development in the area. Secretar Olson said this propert was planned for residential development in the comprehensive plan., Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: in Approval of Cave's Woods and Ponds Addition preliminar plat, subject to the following conditions being met before final plat approval: The pl at shat I be revised as il I castrated on the map to include the +ol I owing: (1) The drainage and utilit easement between Lots 6 and 7 and Lots 5 and 8 of Block One shat I be revised to include access in its description. (To all ow for its use for the drivewa ba An opinion shall be submitted b a certified soils expert which describes the soil correction procedure(s) necessar to prepare the areas proposed as buildin sites for Lots 1 2 and 3 of Block One. These procedures shall be included in the developer's agreements we* Planning Commission Minutes 7-17-89 The -final grading, drainage ut i l it and erosion control plans shat I be approved b the Cit Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: P (1) A proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing st shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading pl a n ma be permitted b the Cit Engineer, provided that the intent of the overal I grading plan is complied with.. (2) The location of the +our-inch and larger diameter trees to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan. The location and t of trees to be replanted (Condition e) shall be shown in the grading plan. (3) The minimum distance between the building pads for Lots 6 and 12. Block One and the west (rear) propert lines of Lots 5 10 and 11 Block One, shall be dimensioned as thirt -five (35) feet on the grading plan, (4) The minimum distance between the building pad for Lot 7, Block One and the west (rear) propert lines of Lots 8 and 9,, BI ock One , shal I be dimensioned at twent (20) f eet on the grading plan. (5) In the grading plan, show the location of the drivewa for Lot 13 9 Block One, including the area for the re turn - around. (6) The grading plan shall maximize preservation of the hill and trees on Lot One , BI ock Two as much as possibl e . 39 'Planning Commission -9_ Minutes 7-17-89 (7) The use of a temporar rock entr%ance pad during construction. do Submittal .to the Cit of a 100-foot- diameter easement for the temporar c:0- de-sac for the Currie Street right-o+ -wa e Submittal of a signed developer's agreement to the Cit Engineer with the re suret for al I pub ic street , pond ing and ut i l it improvements re for this development. This agreement shall also guarantee: (1) That trees will be planted to compl with Section 9-191 (5) (-b) of the environmental protection ordinance. (2) That the prescribed soil correction p roc ed ure (s) in Condition b (above) will be followed. (3) Construction of drivewa turn-arftounds f or Lots 1 9 2 3 12 and 13 BI ock One . (4) Construction of drivewa for Lots 6, 7 and 12, Bl ock One, that compl y with the re of Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. (5) Construction of the temporar Currie Street cul-de-sac + Submittal of a recordable covenant to the Director of Communit Development that restricts the drivewa access to Lots ,6 and 7, Block One, to Currie Street. 20 Approval of the resolution for a variance to Section 36-72 (a) of the Cit code to al I ow the construction of a single-famil dwelling and its attachments for Lot 7, Block One, up to 20 feet from Lots 8 or 9 and for Lots 6 and 12, Block One,, up to .35 feet, from the rear propert I ine. 40 Planning Commission 10 Minutes 7-17-89 Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Ax dahl, Barrett, Cardinal Fiola F i scher Lar%son Sigmundik,, Sletten Do Code Amendment: Planning Commission Procedures Sec reta Olson presented the staff r port. A comet issio r asked staf to -comment n what decision the Cit Co ncil has made on modif n I g the size of the Planning Commission. Secretar 01 son said the C�t Council as decided not to k an changes in the size of th Planning Commis ion at this time .0 Commissioner C a inal moved t e Planning Commission recommend approv 1 of the or inance allowing the PI anning Commissi to elec its chairperson and designating a date f or it annual report. Commissioner Sletten se onded A dahl,, Barrett, Cardinal Fiola, Fischer, Larson Sig mundik, Sletten :E a Flu es of Proced e The staff rep t for the Feu es of Procedure was presented b ecretar 01 son The Commission added to the end f the f irst sent ce of Item C. 2. "and answer q ue ions from the Cit Council regarding the decision" added to item H. 2. "and submitted to the Cit Cou cil for approval." an add to the f if th sentenc of Item J. "two points to second choice". Comm i ioner Fischer moved the P anning Commission recommend approval of the Plann.i g Commission's Rules of Procedure as amendedu Commissioner Sletten seconded A dahl Barrett, Cardinal , Fiola, Fischer Larson S i gmu I ndik, Sletten Viiis UNFINISHED BUSINESS 41 /../- , c; 7,- Action. by Council Endorsed. MEMORANDUM Mo d.ifi ed.... TO: City Manager Rej ect ed--- ,,,,�,- FROM: Director of Community Development Dat . SUBJECT : Preliminary Plat -- ,, Hi l lwood Oaks No . 2 .DATE: August 21, 1989 INTRODUCTION the City Council, August 14, tabled action on the Hillwood Oaks No. 2 preliminary plat until the developer submits a plan showing bui lding pads, finished contours and how the tree line would be effected . DISCUSSION The requested plan is enclosed, :RECOMMENDATION _Approve the preliminary plat as recommended in the July 31 staff report. MEMO10 attachments: 1. Grading plan with trees 2 . July 31 staff report . MEMO10 U vV �,S O • 6 o F,�c . r y N o . Jf 012 CO _y i ss• z� � �- I - _ Q rX i d fl ..� 2 Attachment 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner <SUBJECTo Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Hillwood Drive, East of McKnight Road APPLICANT: Hennen Development Company OWNER: Robert Hennen PROJECT: Hillwood Oaks Number Two DATE: July 31 19B9 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting the approval of a preliminary plat for the previously approved second phase of the South Oaks Second Addition. The development is now proposed to be called Hillwood Oaks Number Two. The property in question is along Hillwood Drive east of McKnight Road and south of the South Oaks First Addition. It is proposed to have 11 single family lots, one outlot and a storm water holding pond when completed. Outlot A would be deeded to the City. The City could then deed it to the property owner to the south for better frontage. Lot 1, block 2 of the Hillwood Oaks No~ 1 plat would be included to form lots 5 and 6 of Hi]lwood Oaks No. 2 plat. ]BA�KGROUND March 23, 1987: The City Counc1l approved the final plat for the South Oaks Second Addition. (See the plat on page 9.) November 23, 1987: The City Council approved minor corrections to the approved South Oaks Second Addition. March 14, 1988: The City Council approved a preliminary plat� street vacation and a rezoning for Hillwood Oaks Number One addition subject to a number of conditions. March 27, 1989: The City Cpuncil approved a time extension and revisions to the conditions of approval for the Hillwood Oaks Number One prel, iminar pl at. DISCUSSION There are three issues with this plat: tree preservation, grading/erosion control and future sidewalks. Tree Preservat i on An important consideration with the development of this site is 3 Attachment 2 the preservation of its nat ral features. The property is heavily .woode and has a storm water pond proposed for the southwest corner. To maximize thenumber of trees to be saved on the ssite, the licant has noted on the plat plans that all trees outside of the grading ]imits are to be saved. Some preliminary site cirading has occurred in the area of the street and the storm water pond. If the areas for grading are' carefully limited to the inimum needed for the completion of the development, then the r`em�inder of the site can be left undisturbed until homes are constructed on the lots. Attention to site planning when the houses are designed will also help to preserve as many trees as reasonably possible. Grad /Ero=ion Control A revised grading plan will be required that shows the location and grades of the housepads on their respective lots prior to final plat approval . In relation to the grading for the project, the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District notes that soil erosion and sedimentation will be a problem on the site unless proper precautions are taken. It has been recommended by the (Conservation District that rock entrance pads, silt fences, and seed and mulch be used to control the potential problems. The Ramsey-Washington Watershed District suggests that the erosion control plan include a protected overflow swale leading from McKni'ht Road to the north corner of the pond. One of the revised conditions for Hillwood Oaks First Addition was a requirememt -for a cash escrow for the- constructipn of a five- foot_wide sidewalk along the north side of Hillwood Drive as it is designated a collector street. The sidewalk construction is contingent uoon the City Council's decision regarding the revised sidewalk plan in the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. A similar cash escrow requirement should be imposed for this plat so that if the- sidewalk plan is adopted, a continuous sidewalk could be constructed from McKnight Road on the west to Vista Hills Park on the east. RECOMMENDATION Approve the preliminary plat for Hillwood Oaks Number Two (plans stamped May 5, 1989) subject to the following conditions being met before final plat approval :. 1. The plat shall be revised as illustrated on the map on page 10 so that the lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block One shall be moved slightly to the east so that the rear corner of the lots matches the rear corner of Lots 5 and 6, Block One, South Oaks Second Addition. 2. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City if the owner to the south agrees to accept the land. If not, outlot A shall � be combined with lot 5, block 2. 3. Prior to any further grading on the site, the final grading, drainage, utility, erosion control , and street plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: (a) A proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for the construction of the streets and the storm water pond. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that have trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall gr^ading plan is complied with. (b) Each tree to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan~ These trees shall also be identified on the Site, (c) The use of rock entrance pads, silt fences and seed and mulch during construction to control soil erosion and sedimentation. (d) The erosion control plan shall include a protected over swale leading from McKnight Road to the north corner of the pond. (e) Submittal to the City Engineer of a signed developer's aagreement with the required surety for the above ' items. 4. Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grading or cu. begins, or final plat approval is given. ' This plan must illustrate the trees that are to be removed, those that are to be retained and those that are to be replanted. 5. Submittal to the City Engineer of a signed developer's agreement with the required surety. This agreement shall address, but not be limited to: (a) Construction of all public improvements, ponding, erosion control and tree planting required for this development. (b) 'Removal of the temporary cul-de-sac for Hillwood Drive, construction o+ . a permanent Hillwood Drive street section (curb, gutter, etc.) and restoration of the temporary cul-de-sac area outside of the per street section to an � acceptable grade with a grass surface. (c) The replanting of trees so that there are at least 10 trees on each acre (2-inch minimum diameter for new or 4-inch minimum diameter for existing) following all construction. Trees to be saved shall beappropriatel - ' f enced during grading and all construction~ (d) A cash escrow for the construction of a five-foot- widesidewalk along the north side of Hillwood Drive. Construction of the sidewa]k is contingent upon the City Council's decision regarding the revised sidewalk plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan. � CITIZEN COMMENTS .. Staff sent neighborhood surveys to 29 property owners within 350 feet o+ the site. Of the seven responses, one was in favor, 3 had no comment and 3 were opposed. ," r-^"^"= The road to McKnight Road (Hillwopd Drive) can be finished. �� 1. | obJe=ct to_the proposal only if it would in any way prohibit us from entering our property (# 95) from Hillwood Drive. Staff reply: See page 1 of the staff report regarding this concern. 2~ I believe that 10 lots on this land would require the removal of too many trees. I would agree with the proposal if fewer lots were proposed and concern for preserving as many trees as .possible are take� into consideration. I also obJect if this p/zs , development would require costs or assessments for me. Staff reply: The lots as proposed meet all City requirements for size and the project density is well within the requirements of the land u s e pIc i m. Through the use of the Environmental Protection Ordina.-rice, as many trees as.possible should be protected during the development of the property. All costs associated with this development will be paid for by the 3. I feel that at the present time it is rushing development to - go ahead with this project. I feel that the proposal should be delayed until other developments in the area have progressed a litt]e farther and a need for additional development is clear. Staff reply: The City cannot control development competition through its zoning Femmd regulatiOns. 7 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Gross Area: 4,85 acres Net area: 4.34 acres Exist�ng land use: Undeveloped ' SURROUNDING LAND USES N Single family lots around Teakwood Court East: Undeveloped land of the proposed Hillwood Oaks No. 1 South: Undeveloped property zoned F, Farm Residence planned for low'density residential development ' West Single family homes across McKnight Road in St. Paul PLANNING Land use plan designation: RL, Low density residential 'Propo density: 2.3 lots per acre Zoning: R1 Single family residential 1~ Vista Hills Land Use Plan 2~ property Line/Zoning Map 3. South Oaks Second Addition Final Plat 4. Hillwood Oaks Number 2 Preliminary Plat kenrmemo6 � y0 i m a o a E major arterial Lower At3on ----- R^N5EY Co. L'S C w oRK nou s I RM M minor it Ctor — • w j R m Ob.. O E Rh Rl I R inor collector �. dui a l l a n d_ I 11 P C Y .. p Os o > �r s 1 MMWrvW ,r, �• minor c Aleclor •� � c .. Rl - 1 w �m c 1 E O I t E Linwood ML v an major c llector v � 1 o � t 5 CL 1 C 1 VISTA HILLS LAND USE PLAN N 9 Attachment 7 ;1 1 A 4 0 ' 3 60 046 1 �w '�_- 1 R o p J. IV v P--% 1 O U H 4 w ;s I 54) N S ip �oS: 0.!A K'S TEA K W00D COURT r- 51f to �• g M A CI CI M1 S4 c 21 '� g 77 2 , 17 o r , o + � - � 75 .. L is - -- 4 ��03 a 1.. Y r� 14 Q 1 "71 q s % r -871 ; a• � IVs ll ' 1 v d 4_.28 ac, (3 OA R t DG E D f 1 2 Ir a rc QowO�NC, 93.9 9!' 9.1 90 9a df F L04. AGF- # 3 4 e a i E snrT �' S E 3 (37) 1 O * � At N ` O -12.5 3 (e. 3) � ) r S� l ' Z 3 3� 4 3 2� u� < t 3 , , t i 183 44 / PROPERTY LONE /ZONING 10 k-- 5.7 .-�' MAP Attachment 2 Q N 46f E r c t z; d ;;�) ; 1) 9 - . 2 t. 7 9 B 4-1 1 rLt! (4 -) 104 2O8 Gtr ?� s3 Cn rn 1 0 25 -, t (50) It q0 O 2 a a T A . ono � 03; � 3 53 p 2 's •1 �- 43. z�O. © - t 1.33 (2) ' - �' s ? ,� uo 0 22 - W •, � �,i� O 1 M 40 j O U H 4 w ;s I 54) N S ip �oS: 0.!A K'S TEA K W00D COURT r- 51f to �• g M A CI CI M1 S4 c 21 '� g 77 2 , 17 o r , o + � - � 75 .. L is - -- 4 ��03 a 1.. Y r� 14 Q 1 "71 q s % r -871 ; a• � IVs ll ' 1 v d 4_.28 ac, (3 OA R t DG E D f 1 2 Ir a rc QowO�NC, 93.9 9!' 9.1 90 9a df F L04. AGF- # 3 4 e a i E snrT �' S E 3 (37) 1 O * � At N ` O -12.5 3 (e. 3) � ) r S� l ' Z 3 3� 4 3 2� u� < t 3 , , t i 183 44 / PROPERTY LONE /ZONING 10 k-- 5.7 .-�' MAP Attachment 2 Q N i • N E$ W 39' 51' E cv x O O N �r t � i i • N E$ W 39' 51' E cv x O O N OC N 88�39�51" E O r WWWAM I � 4 Q O` r Q a� 1 a FINAL PLAT FIRST PHASE -- SOUTH OAKS 2ND ADDITION 11 Attachment 3 'u fl 49 B.0 4 3 t tj 114 fj ;�� "! 1 4 TEAKWOOD V COURT OAK:; No). � ' i� lb _ t . I A % • • i � - /{ I/O r 3 Vj gr 2 tl �� -vas► _ •.. � �� . ` � �. / / � : � h O it H 0 x\ 1 p �o r �' - �: +; 3' or 'LITLOT A w oll is 5; O 4 11 te Y L tt #� ( 1.�1.J `• / � � / +. � /. � . 41 1 .4 MAY 4 5 1989 HILLWOOD OAKS N0.2 Attachment 4 4 P1an..ning Commission Minutes 8 -7 -89 B. Preliminary 'na Plat: Hillwood Oaks No. 2 (Hennen) ' anner, Ken Roberts, Associate Pl , resented the staff P Mr. Roberts ,said sai.d that Outlot A would be report. _ , o the City and the City could then deed it deeded .to y to.the property owner to the south f or better street frontage. • Larry Samstad Itaska Engineering, 1221 4th Avenue nen Development East, Shakopee, representing Hen Company, said he wanted a time limit on.the outcome of out lot of A so that if it is not deeded to the property t , o the south it will be combined with Lot 5, Block 29 ' Cardinal moved the Planning Commissi recommend approval of the preliminary p on Commissioner C plat for ' wood Oaks Number Two (plans stamped May 5 • Hill 4 1989). subject ect to the f oil l ow.ng conditions being met before final plat approval: 1. The plat shall be revised so that the lot line between Lots 2 and 3 Block 1, shall be moved slightly to the east so that the rear corner of the lots matches the rear corner of Lots 5 and Block One, South Oaks Second Addition, 6, waiving radial requirement. t A shall be deeded to the City if the 2, Out10 owner to the south agrees to accept the land within a reasonable time designated by City If not, Outlot A shall be combined Council* with Lot. 5 , 81 ock 2 . • further grading on the site, 3 . Prior to any furth • g g the , final grading, drainage, utility, erosion control, and street plans shall be approved by g the City Engineer* These plans shall include, but not be limited to: building pad elevation and Cad A proposed contour information for ea ch home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for the construction of the streets and the storm water P ond. Housing styles shall be - illustrated which minim ize g rading on sites that have trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan ma y be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan lan is complied with. 13 .Planning Commission Minutes 8-7-89 (b) Each tree to be saved shall be shown on the grading plan. These trees shall also be identified on the site. (c) The use of rock entrance pads, silt fences and seed and 'mulch during construction to control soil erosion and sedimentation. (d) The erosion control plan shall include a protected overflow swale leading from McKnight Road to the north corner of the pond. (e) Submittal to the City Engineer of a signed developer's agreement with the required surety for the above items. 4. Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grading or construction begins or final plat approval is given. This plan Must illustrate the trees that are to be removed, those that are to be retained and those that are to be replanted. 50 Submittal to the City Engineer of a signed developer's agreement with the required surety. This agreement shall address, but not be limited to (a) Construction of all public improvements, ponding, erosion control and tree planting required for this development. (b) Removal of the temporary cul -de -sac for Hillwood Drive, construction of a permanent Hillwood Drive street section (curb, gutter, etc.) and restoration of the temporary cul -de -sac area outside of the permanent street section to an acceptable grade with a grass surface. (c) The replanting of trees so that there are at least 10 trees on each acre (2 -inch minimum diameter for new or 4 -inch minimum diameter for existing) following all construction. Trees to be saved shall be appropriately fenced during grading and all construction. 14 Planning Commission Minutes 8 -7 -89 (d) A cash escrow for the construction of a five -foot -wide sidewalk along the north side of Hillwood Drive. Construction of the sidewalk is contingent upon the City Council's decision regarding the revised sidewalk plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Larson, Sletten 15 . 11,3 ` Action b Cou MEMORANDUM Endorsed,....... Modifle � TO: City Managr _e~eJ eoted-___ FROM: Director of Community Development Dat SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Planning Commission Procedures jOATEo February 13, 1989 The attached ordinance would allow the Planning Commission to ochoose their own chairperson, as other commissions do, and would /change the date that the annual report must be submitted to the (City Council from December 31 to the second council meeting in February. Since year-end information is not available until December 31, more time is needed to write the report, get it approved by the Planning Commission, and scheduled for a Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the attached ordinance. .GO/MEMO Attachment s: Code Amendment ORDINANCE NON AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ELECT ITS CHAIRPERSON AND DESIGNATING A DATE FOR ITS ANNUAL REPORT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS (additions are underl i ned and del et ions crossed out) Section 1. Section 25-20 is amended as follows: Sec. 2.5-20. Chair 2 erson., Gha+immeft i The chairperson c-Aa+pffien of the Planning Commission shall be elected b the Planning Commission at the first meeting in Januar of each y ear from among the members of the Planning Commission. The chair ,person eha-irm&m shall be respo for calling and presiding at meetings and shall be entitled to an e vote with other members of the Commission. I Section 2. Section 25-22 is amended as follows: Sec . -25-22. Off icers meetings,, rul es of procedure publ i c attendance ; etc (a) The Planning Commission shall elect its own officers , establish meeting times, and adopt its own rules of procedure to be reviewed and approved b the Cit -Council. (b) All meetings of the adyi-smtw Planning Commission shall be open to the public. -pub 4-+e -atte"daftee Section 3. Section 25-23 (5) is amended as follows: (5) To review,, prepare and make a report to the Cit * Council b the second cond Cit Council meeting in Februar of each y ear regarding trlmve-e�t . +of" -icKarmejes -voh+eK-t he-eemm +ss +art-met -des +tmab 4-e-- the Commission-'s activities in the past_year . and major projects for the new y earN Section 4 Section 25-23 (8) is amended as +ol I ows: (8) To review and mak-e recommendations to the Ci_t Council on development a icat ions --.,. such as rezonings. conditional use ersn i t s variances, vacations.- preliminary plats and home oc'c at ion I i censes. (9). 4E3+ To accept such other and further duties as ma from time to time, be directed b the Cit Council including conducting hearings. Section 5 . This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , i 5 89 . Mayor ATTEST: City G1erk Ayes_. Nays -- r- Action b c ounoll! MEMORANDUM To.: Michael A. From: Robert D. Subjo, Maplewood Date: Au 22, Endorsed........ Modifi e*d..,.., Rejected.. McGuire, Cit Manager Date Ode Director of Parks & Recreation Residential Surve B Decision Resources 1989 0 Introduction The firm of Decision Resources has prepared the attached surve questions based on a series of two brainstormin sessions with staff. In addition to all departments participating in the dis- cussion, a re was sent to all members of Boards and Commis- sions in the cit to sug topics that the would like included in the surve Back On Ma 18, the Cit Council approved the concept of a Communit Survey and directed staff to meet with consultants to discuss the Cit needs and to have . a consultant present to the Cit Council their firm.'s process for a Communit Surve Four firms were interviewed b staff on June 2, and it was recommended that Decision Resources return for a second interview on Frida June 30, Dr. William Morris, President of Decision Resources, attended the Council meetin on Jul 10 and further discussed the method of surve the City,, costs, and to answer questions from the Council, The Council at that time approved the cost of the surve from a minimum of $5,400, with additional costs to be ap- proved b the Cit Mana but not to exceed $10,000. The present surve consists 109 units. The cost of the the items in the surve are a question with a number of affect the cost. However, cost would increase,, Council Action of 150 questions, which computes to present surve is $9,750. Man of interrelated and, therefore, reducin different parts will not adversel if more q uestions are recommended, the The Council is re to review the q uestions in the attached surve for additional topic input or reduction. Due to other commitments, Dr. M is not available for the Council meetin on September 2 8, From DRL ,DECISION RESOURCES r LTD . 312 8 Dean Court M . . , Minnesota 55414 Aug. 22. 1999 03: 46 Phi P01 MA PLE'WOOD RES IDENTIAL COMMUNITY CENTER ISSUES Version 2.1 Hello I of Decision Resources, Ltd., a nationwide p ollin g ollin firm located in Minneapolis We've been retained by the c ity of Maplewood to speak with a random samp le of residents about is sues g �' r facin the cit including a community center. The survey g is being taken because the City is interested in your , opinions and suggestions. I want to assure you that all individual responses will be held strictly confidential ,• only summaries of the entire sample will be reported (DO NOT PAUSE) 10 Approximately how many years have you lived in Maplewood? LESS THAN ONE YEAR..00001 ONE OR TWO YE,A►RS . 6 0 ..... 2 THREE TO FINE YEARS .. **e3 SIX TO TEN YEARS000606094 ELEVEN TO TWENTY YEARS . 5 OVER TWEN'T'Y YEARS ...... s 6 DON' T KNOW / REFUSED & i . • • i 7 20 In ghat city and /or state was your immediately prior residence iodated? As things now stand, how long LESS THAN ONE YEAR 0 6 4 0 .. 1 in the future do you expect to ONE TO TWO YEARS* ... *...,2 live in Maplewood THREE TO FIVE YEARS0000.3 SIX TO TEN YEARS.90 0.4.0 4 OVER TEN YEARS.i.......05 DON'T KNOW /REFUSED. 0000. 4 How would you rate the qual of EXCELLENT. 0 0 0 0 We . • . + . . . • 1 life in Maplewood -- excellent, GOOD* . . .................2 good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............3 DON ' T KNOW/REFUSED 0 0 0 0 .. 5 5. What do you like MOS about l iving in Maplewood? 60 What do you like LEAST about it? 1 From DRL flug.22.1989 ©3:46 PM 7. in general, do you usual spend. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES . 6 . 6 4 0 1 your l e isu re time in outdoor INDOOR ACTIVITIES • ...... 2 activities, weather permitting, BOTH....... + 6666. , 6666. . 3 or indoor activities? NO LEISURE TIME........ * 4 14. DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. • .. 5 8e Mould you f avor or appose an in-- FAVOR** * * I crease in city property taxes if OPPOSE,... * .............2 1 it were needed to maintain city DON' T KNOW /REFUSED...... 3 services at their current level? water and sewer? 1 9 Do you consider property taxes in t OMPARA VELA LA)W • . • • ... 4 5 Maplewood to be comparatively ABOUT AVERAGE 6 9 4 0.6 0 0 0 • . 2 low, a bo ut average, relatively RELATIVELY HIGH .........3 4 5 high or excessively high? EXCESSIVELY HIGH... • ....4 4 DON e T KNOW /REFUSED 6666.. 5 i0e When you consider the property EXCELLENT90400...460060.1 taxes you pay and the quality of 000D........t...»9......2 city services you receive, would ONLY FAIR ...............3 you rate the general value of POOR * ...................4 city servers as excel lent, good, DON'T KNOW /REFUSED6 only fair, or poor? As you may know, property taxes are divided between the city of Maplewood, Ramsey County, and local school. districts 11.. For caoh dollar o property taxes UNDER TEN PERCENT. , 0, 4 4 4 . 1 you pay, about what percentage do 10% TO.20 %000460.000004.2 you think goes to city govern 21% TO 3 0% . • ...... • ..... 3 ment? (READ CHOICES, IF NEEDED) 31% TO 4 0% ....... • . • .... 4 41� TO 50 %0000.0000000.05 51% TO 60 %.••9...s..•...6 OVER SIXTY PERCENT .sass . 7 DON'T K.NOW/REFUSED s ..... 8 For yo information the city percentage is about fifteen Percent . I would like to read you a list of a few city services. F o r each one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor? EXC GOOD FAIR POOR D . K . 12. Police protection? 1 2 3 4 5 139 Fire protection? 1 2 3 4 5 14. City street repair and maintenanc 1 2 3 4 5 15e, water and sewer? 1 2 3 4 5 16. Snow pl owing? 1 2 3 4 5 2 From : DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03:46 PM P03 24* other than voting, do you feel YES• ....................1 EXC GOOD FAIR POOR D • Vii. 17. Animal . control.? 1 2 3 4 5 is* Park maintenance? 1 2 3 4 5 19. ..Building and inspec- DON'T KNOW/ REFUSED.. a ... 3 featuring exhibits about the community? I would now like to read you a list of tion services? 1 2 3 4 5 - 20*, Community planning? 1 2 3 4 5 21• Deputy Registrar at City Ha ll, handling motor- vehicles licenses and permits? 1 2 3 4 5 22. Street sweeping? 1 2 3 4 5 IF "ONLY FAIR" OR " POOR" IN QUESTIONS *12-22, ASK FOR EACH 23 • why did you rate as (only fair/poor) 24* other than voting, do you feel YES• ....................1 that if you wanted to, you could No.......a,........w..•.2 have a say about the way the City ION T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 of Maplewood runs things? 25. How would you rate the general EXCELLENT0•060.9064•....1 sense of community among Maplem- GOODS ....... wood resident -- excellent, ONLY good, only fair, or poor? POOR • .... • .. • . • ......... 4 DON IT KNOW /R.EFUSED...... 26* would you favor or oppose th FA'V`OR • ..... 6 6 0 0 • • . • . • . . . 1 esta blishm ent of a Maplewood o��os�...........•.. Historical. Society center, DON'T KNOW/ REFUSED.. a ... 3 featuring exhibits about the community? I would now like to read you a list of recreatIona1 activities, First, for each one, tell me how often you or members of your household engage in that activity. Do you or household members engage in the activity four times a we ek or more often, once a week, once or twice a several times each year, or not at all. For seasonal activities, please tell me how often you or ho usehold members participate during the season. 3 From : DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM PO4 4+ TINES ONCE 1/2 SEVERAL NOT WEEKLY WEEK MONTH YEAR AT ALL 27. Baseball or sof tbal. l games? 1 2 3 4 5 28a Basketball? 1 2 3 4 5 29. Bicycling? 1 2 3 4 5 30. Racquetball? 1 2 3 4 5 31. Hockey? 1 2 3 4 5 32. Golfing? 1 2 3 4 5 33. Volleyball? 1 2 3 4 5 34. Jogging? 1 2 3 4 5 35, Dancing? 1 2 3 4 5 36, Cx cuusi Skiing? 1 2 3 4 5 37. Archery? 1 2 3 4 5 38. Horseshoes? 1 2 3 4 5 39. Swimming? 1 2 3 4 5 40. Tennis? 1 2 3 4 5 411 Hiking or Walking? 1 2 3 4 5 42* Soccer? 1 2 3 4 5 43. Fishing? 1 2 3 4 5 44. Indoor Ice Skating? 1 2 3 4 5 .45. outdoor Ice Skating? 1 2 3 4 5 4. Picnicking? 1 2 3 4 5 47. Exercising in a gym or health spa? 1 2 3 4 5 Turning to parks and recreational opportunities.... 48,v in general, how well informed are VERY WELL INF0RMED......1 you about the Maplewood park SOMEWHAT INFORMED....... 2 system and facilities. Would you NOT TOO WELL INSORMED... 3 may you are very well informed, NOT AT ALL XNFt'RMED, ,, ... 4 somewhat informed, not too well DON ♦ T KNOW /REFUSED.... , . 5 informed, or not at all informed? 4 From DRL Au - 22. 1989 03: 46 PSI P05 49. How would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT ................ reational facilities in Maple GOOD ..................,,2 wood -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR. .. . . . . . • • .. . . .3 f air, or poor? POOR ....................4 DON O T KNOW /REFUSED ...... 5 50. Do you feel that the current mix YES 609604.90.940.00•900 0 1 of recreational opportunities No ......................2 suff iciently meets the needs of DON'T KNOW /REFUSED ...... 3 members of your household? IF it NO r " ASK: 51. What additional recreational opportunities would you l ike to see the City of Maplewood offer residents? 52 . In th past year, have you or any YES ..................... l members of this household partici*- NO. # 2 gated in any park and recreat DON KNOW /REFUSED . . . . . . J programs? IF 'AYES," ASK: 53 Which canes? 54. Were you generally satis- SATISFIED...... ♦ ♦.��. fied or dissatisfied with DISSATISFIED............2 the program (s ) ? DON'T KNOW /REFUSED . , . 3 Changing focus.... 55. How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL* 0 * 0 0 a 4 6 0 0 0 0 # 4 1 a`hout the work of the Mayor and FAIR AM0UNT ............. 2 city council MW *AM a great deal, a .VERY LITTLE.......6.....3 fair amount, or very little? DON'T OW /REFUSED...... 4 56* From what you know, do you ap STRONGLY APPROVE ...... 1 prove or disapprove of the job SOMEWHAT APPROVE .. , , .. , . 2 the Mayer and city council are SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE.....3 doing? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) STRONGLY DISAPPROVE ..... 4 And do you feel strongly that DON'T KNOW /REFUSED...... 5 way? 57 Now much first -hand contact have QUITE A LOT .............1 you had with the Maplewood City SOME ...............,....2 staff ---m quite a lot, some, very VERY LITTLFj* * .. , .... , , .. 3 little or not at al NONE AT ALL .............4 DON'T KNOW /DEFUSED......5 5 From DRL Aug. 22. 1 999 03:46 PM P09 58. From what you have seen or heard, EXCELLENT...............1 DON'T how would you rate the job per- GOOD** 00 . . . 00 . . . 6* ♦ . . 2 NOT formance of the Maplewood city % . , ONLY FAIR.........,..,., 1 2 staff --�- excellent, good, only POOR ................ ....4 65. operat ID? 1 fair, or poor? _ DON'T KNOW /REFUSED . , .... 5 Let's talk about public safety in Maplewood.... 2 59. Do you feel that crimes against '1NCREASED............., . �. property in Maplewood have DECREASED ............ Program? 3 increased, decreased, or re-- ABOUT THE SAME .......... 3 ma ined about the same during DOS'' T KNOW /REFUSED ...... 4 the past five years? 609 Row about crimes against people, INCREASED........ 1 • . . .... 1. have they increased, decreased, DECREASED* 9 a a a w *2 or remained about the same during ABOUT THE SAME400.......3 the past f ive years? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 61. During the past year, have you YES i .................... �. b een invo lved i or observed a ND••.•.•..•. situation in which a member of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 the Maplewood Police Department was present? IF "YES," ASK: 62a Would you say the way the EXCti,LEIYT ....... ........1 police handled the situation GOOD ................ was excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR ...............3 f air, or poor? POOR* 9oo **o9**** ooe *** **4 DON'T KNOW /REFUSED......5 63. Would you say the time PROMPT..w........ +.+..1 it took the police to re NOT PpOMPT ..............2 spond was prompt, or not? DOW T KNOW /REFUSED...... 3 .I would like to read you a short list of prevention services provided by the Maplewood Publ Safe D For each on please tell me if you were aware of it. For those you know about, please tell me if you or members of this household have in the past or are currently using the service. .6 AWARE DON'T UNAWARE USED NOT KNOW 64, Neighborhood Watch? 1 2 3 4 65. operat ID? 1 2 3 4 6 Pol ice Paramedics? 1 2 3 4 67 Fami crime Prevention Program? 3 2 3 4 .6 From : DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM P07 AWAn DON / T UNAWARE USED NOT KNOW 6 8. police- School Liaison Program, ,� 2 3 4 590 DARE --- anti -drugs program in the schools? 1 2 3 4 70. During the past twelve months YES.......... have you contacted anyone working N06...8.9..64...49......2 for the City of Maplewood, other DON'T KNOW /R.EFUSED......3 than the police or fire depart- ments, Whether to obtain informamm tion, to get service, or make a complaint of any kind? IF "YES," ASK: i 71 What was the nature of your most recent inquiry; that is, what information or service did you need? 72. What department or official did you contact first about this inquiry? 739 In general, were you satis- fied or dissatisfied with the DISSATISFIED...... 2 way your inquiry was handled? DON f T KNOW /REFUSED...... 3 IF "DISSATISFIED, " ASK: 74* why were you dissatisf 75. During the past year, have you YES ...................... visited the Maplewood City Nth.... .................. Hall DON I T KNOW f REFUS ED ...... 3 IF "YES,"' ASK: For each of the following characteristics, please rate the Maplewood City Hall facility or Staff as excellent, good, only fair, or poor.... 7 From DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM P08 76. Conven of City Hall hours? 1 2 3 4 5 77. waiting time for service? 1 2 3 4 5 78. Courtesy of the sta ff? 1 2 3 4 5 79. Efficiency of the sta ff? 1 2 3 4 5 any of the remaining open spaces in the city are privately owned • 80* would you favor or oppose the City FAVOR .............. 0 1 acquiring the larger parcels of OPPOSE .................. 2 land to insure they are kept as DUN IT KNOT /REFUSED......3 .nature ar or dev for recreational purposes only? The acquisitio of these properties could require the passag of a bond referendum to fund the proj ect. .81. How much in additional property N0THING 0..0....0•.......1 takes would you be willing to pay? (START WITH RANDOM CHOICE) $5D0000• ................3 Let's clay, would you be willing $7� ..... . . . ............. � to pay $ per year? (MOVE UP $18 .................... OR DOWN DEPEN' DIN G ON ANSWER.. o * w $125 REPEAT THE PROCESS *) $1'50 .......... ..........7 $175•••• ♦.••••.•......8 DOW T KNOW/ RE FUS E D. 0 0 0 0 .9 82, Would you favor or oppose roving FvoR... ................�. the Deputy Reg istrar's Office at OPPOSE* 006* 499 , ... 2 C ity Hall to the Maplewood Mal NO DIFFERENCE or . does it ma no differe DON'T KNOW /REFUSED...... 4 Let's talk about future de velopment in Maplewood. I would 1 ike to read you a short list of types of development. For each one, please tell me if you feel the city has enough, too many, or too aittl.e.... o . BNOU MANY LITT D.X. 83. Retail shopping opportunities? 1 2 3 4 8 Commerci office build 1 2 3 4 850 Apartment and multi family buildings? 1 2 3 4 86 -. Starter homes for young families? 1 2 3 4 '87• senior citizen housing? 1 2 3 4 88. Light industrial plants? 1 2 3 4 89,* Open spaces? 1 2 3 4 8 From : DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM P09 Many communities across the Metropolitan Area have either built or are considering building a community Center. 90* i f Maplewood were to build a community center, what types of facilities do you think it most important to include? 91,. Are there any particular activities or programs and serviceii the center should offer to serve the needs of you and other members of your household? (IF "YES ASKO what are they? 92,v Do you favor or appose the comm- STRONGLY F"OR ..... , . ♦ . . 1 struction of a Maplewood Com- SOMEWHAT FAVOR..... * . . . .2 munity center? (WAIT FOR RE- SOMEWHAT OPPOSE ......... 3 SPONSE} Arid do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 4 that way? DON' T KNOW /REFUSED . . . . . . 5 X F "SUPPORT" OR "OPPOSE, It ASK: 9 3 . why coo you feel that way? I would like to read you a list of facilities that could be included in a community center. For 'each one, please tell zee if you would strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose its inclusion in a community center. STR SMW SMW STR D.K. FAV FAV ©PP OPP REF* 94. An indoor ice skating rink? 95.. An indoor competition or lap pool? 96, An indoor leisure fun pool? .97* Racquetball courts? 980 An exercise, fitness, and weight room? 99. A steam bath and sauna spa? 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1. 2 3 4 5 From : DRL Aug. 22. 1999 03:46 PM P10 STR BMW SNW 5TR • FAV FA.'V' OPP OPP RED' 100, An indoor running /walking facility? 1 2 3 4 5 101. An arts and crafts root for class and instructional programs? l 2 3 4 5 102. A gymnasium? 1 2 3 4 5 1030 A senior citizens drop -in center? 1 2 3 4 5 X44. A whirlpool bath and hot tub facility? 1 2 3 4 5 105• An aerobics and dance room? 1 2 3 4 5 Yob. Large community room for banquets, parties, organ - ization meetings, and other rental purposes? 1 2 3 4 5 307, An outdoor pleasure pool? 1 2 3 4 5 1.08 . An outdoor water slide? 1 2 3 4 5 109s A community theatre? 1 2 3 4 5 110. A teen center? 1 2 3 4 5 111. Snack bar, soda fountain., and coffee shop? 1 2 .3 4 5 1 would like to briefly re -read that list of p otential facilities for a community center. (READ LIST BELOW) 112 -. Please tell me which ONE you most strongly favor for inclusion. 113s. Which facility do you consider eecond in importance? `114. Is there any facility that you would PARTICULARLY oppose including in a center? MOST SEC OPP An indoor ice skating rink? 01 01 01 An indoor Competition or lap pool? 02 02 02 An indoor leisure fun pool? 03 03 03 Racquetball courts? 04 04 04 An exercise, fitness, and weight room? 05 05 05 A steam bath and sauna spa? 06 06 05 An indoor runninglwa.lk.ing facility? Q7 07 07 An arts and crafts room? 08 08 08 A gymna s iu-n? 09 09 09 10 From : 0RL Aug. 22. 1 989 03: 46 PM P11 MOST EEC OPP A senior citizens drop , -in center? 10 10 10 .A whirlpool bath and hot tub facility? 11 11 11 An aerobics and dance room? _ 12 12 12 Large c ommun ity room? 13 13 14 An outdoor pleasure pool? 14 14 15 An outdoor water s 15 15 15 A community theatre? 15 15 15 A teen center 17 17 17 Snack bar, soda fountain, and coffee shop? 18 18 is All equal 19 19 19 Non 20 20 20 Don ]Know/Ref 21 21 21 115. Are there any other fa cilities you would like to see in the Community Center? (IF "YES." ASK:) what are they? 115. If a proposed community center con -QUITE A LOT MORE 860.66001 tained the features you most fav- SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 0000 2 ored, how much more like would NOT AT ALL...... • . .. ♦ • . 3 you be to support its construc- DON'T KNOW /REFUSED... , : .4 t ion -- quite a lot more likely, somewhat more likely, or not at all? one room in the Community Center could be used for supervised child care, while parents are utilizing the facility, 117, How likely would your household be ALMOST CERTAIri100664.....1 to util ize this child care facii- VERY LIKELY.... w 0 0 0 0 . • . • 2 ity -410 almost certa very SOMEWHAT LIKELY . . , . . . . . 3 likely, somewhat l ikely, or not at NOT AT ALL LIKELY O. 0 0 0 0 .4 all likel DON'T KNOW / 5 N o . site has been selected since preliminary discussions are just un�erway, 1 How far --- in terms of minutes ftb- would you be wi lling to drive in order to use the Community Center? `used on our previous discussion of the facilities which could be of fered in the center, please tell me how many members of this hou sehold would probably.... 119. Vis it the Community Center on a frequent, at least weekly, basis? 120 visit the Community Center on an occasional, perhaps monthly, basis? If a community center were built, the City would face two choices on charging user fees. First, the City could subsidize the 11 From DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM P12 operation of the center through general tax revenue fees �.oww ar, second and keep user , the City could require the facility o -be self - sufficient, requiring much hig her user fees Y . 121 Which course of action would, you SUBSIDIZE. favor -- should the city subsi- DON , SUBSIDIZE, ... • ....... ` . • + �` � m • . • • • ,► r r G dixe operating costs through DON "T KNOW /REFUSED to .� /REFUSEI3......3 g x revenues or not. To cover the operating costs of the Community enter, the a moderate fees Y ► City charge es athletic facility users. In this way, operating expenses .incurred by the City could be decr 12 2,o Would the charge of a moderate fee for a dai pass to use facilities, such as the ice arena, swimming pooh. , and arts and crafts rooms, significantly decrease your use of those facilities, or net.? YES ......•..............1 N0 6 • • . • , • • • • r . . . • . . .2 DEFENDS CAN FEE.......... 3 DON 1 T KNOW /REFUS ED . 4 The City might also offer individual memberships to recreational facility users, Members would have unlimited access to all facil ities. 123 How much wou you be will pay yearly for an individual membership. Letts say, would be willing to pay $ (DEPENDING ON RESPONSE, CHOOSE THE NEXT HIGHER OR LOWER CATEGORY . ) How about $ ( RE PEAT PROLES S . ) t o NOTHING . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . 1. $2 %* . • . 00 00 . ♦ . . .. . . . . . 2 y ou $ 5O . . . . i . . . • . . . . r . • . . . . . 3 $ $12 . . • . . • s ♦ . . • * . • • 5 $1500*0*0 • • . a • . . . . • • • • • • $ 175 0 r • • • r r . • • r • • • r a • • • . 7 $2000***0*4 DON' T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 9 The City could also offer family memberships to recre facility users, The same access provisions would • ap 1 p y 124 • How much would you be willing to pay yearly for a family member- - ship? Letts say, would you be willing to pay $ ? (DEPENDING ON RESPONSE, CHOOSE THE NEXT HIGHER - OR LOWER CATEGORY.} How about $ ? • {REPEAT PROCESS. NOTHING ....•....... $50 4000 . • • • . . . • a . 00 t . . 2 $ZOO .................... $2500 000* *to a V 00 0 06 06 $ $350.......•.........•..8 DON ' T KNOW/REFUSED, 9 It might be helpful to discuss comparable fees. The family membership at the YMCA costs $720 yearly, while U.S. Swim and Fitness membership costs $328. Cities tend to charge less. Edon Prairie charges its fami $1 yearly, while Brooklyn Center yearly family membe fees are $228, 12 From . . DPL Aug. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM P13 125o would you pay $150.00 for a one YES ........ . year family membership to the .......... , . Maplewood Community Center? DON'T KNOW /RE FUS 1J . r • . . . 3 Mangy► community centers offer c • lasses and instruct on a variety of topics. Instruction in various arious sports exerc and fitness, crafts, and general courses on home management, current affa and other topics have been offered red in the past. 126. If the Mapl ewood Commun Cent VERY were to offer c � =�ELY.....•....•.•1 lasses on a variety soME'WHAT LIKELY... Of topics, hoer likely would y ou or NOT " ` 2 members -of TaC� LIKELY .......... 3 me of this household be to NOT AT ALL LIKEL enroll in them -- very ....4 y likely, DON'T KNOW /REFUSED......5 somewhat likely, not too likel or not at all likely? Moving on.... During the past year, there has been a major camp ' �, � p �gn to convince es i dents to recycle. 127. Do you currently separate recy- clables from the rest of your NO* a 0 4 0 02 g DON' KNOW REFUSED. IF "NO, ASK 128. Could you tell me why you don't currently recycle? To encourage recycling, a proposal has been made to base e arba g g hauling charges on the volume of trash a household g enerates. Hou seholds which recycled would pay less than similar households which did not. 129. Would you favor or oppose this FA�C�R 16 16 . • .............. ,1 approach? c�P�oE * • 1616. • ............ 2 DON , F T KNOW /REFUSED 16 16 .... 3 130. Do you reside in a single family house or duplex? IF "YES , " ASK: 131. Do you now compost your leaves and yard waste on your property, at one of the area compost sites, or dis- pose of them in your trash? YES * * ***** * * . . . . . . . • . ee DONUT KNOW /REFUSED......3 ONPROPERTY 16 0 4 .......... 1 AT AREA COMPOST SITE .... 2 DISPOSE IN TRASH........3 DON f T KNOW/REFUSED • ..... 4 13 From DRL Aug. 22. 1989 03 : 46 PM P14 132. What is your primary source of information about City government and its activities? 13 3. Does your household currently YES 00 0 ,...... ... receive ca b1A tele NO * .....................2 DON' KNOW /REFUSED...... IF 11 YES i It ASK: 134t If City council Meetings were televised, how like is it you would watch them very likely, somewhat l ikely, not too l ikely. or not at a ll l ikely? VERY SOMEWHAT LI ICE LY ......... 2 NOT TOO L1 SCE LY . + .. f ...... 3 NOT AT ALL LIKELY*, .....4 DON I T KNOW /REFUSED . . .... 5 13 9. Do you recall receiving "Maplewood YES.............,........ � in Motibn," the city's information NO .................. publication, during the past year? DON'T KNOW/rREFUSED......3 IF t'YES," ASK: 1369 Do you or any members of your YES.....................1 household regularly read it? ND ......................2 DON' KNOW/REFUSED. . e 4, * v 3 IF "YES, " ASK: How effective is the city newsletter in keeping you informed about activities . i.n the City**** 137 Would you say very effective, somewhat effective, or not at all effective? VERY EFFECTIVE6000......I SOMEWHAT EFFECT?VE...... NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE....3 DON T KNOW/ REFUSED 0 0 0 0 .. 4 NOW, just a few more questions for demographic purposes.... could you. please tell one how many people in each of the following age groups live in your household. Let's start oldest to youngest.... 138. First, persons 65 or over? 139. Adults under 65? (including yourself 140. High school. aged? (Grades 10 12) 14 From :. 0RL Au g. 22. 1989 03: 46 PM PIS 141. 311nior high aged? (Graders 7 - 9) 142 A Elementary school children? ( Grades K-6) 143. Pre schoolers7 _ 14 4,w Do you own or rent your p r e s ent res idences RENT. DON' XNoW /REFUSED. • .... 3 145♦ What is your age, please? (READ CATEGORIES IF NEEDED ) 25 - 34 55 ...64 . • • • a . • • • • • • • • • • • a • 65 AND 0 VEN••••a.•••••• • 6 REFUSED...... • ..... • ....7 '14 6 . What i the Occupation of the head of this household , 147. What is the last grade of school LESS THAN HIGH SOHOOL.. • 1. You Completed? HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE, RADUATE . • .. 2 Y.0-TE SCHOOL* • w a r r . • • • 3 SOME COLLEGE . • .. ♦ • . • . • • 44 COLLEGE GRADUATE* • • • . • .. 5 POSTa GRADUATE....... • ... 6 RE P USED • ! . . . . . . . . . . . • r . . 7 148. Could you tell me your approximate UNDE $x.2,500... •.,. •.. •�. pre -tax yearly household income • $12 5 Does the ln�com « , 0 00 .... • .... 2 e lies . s . $25, 001'x'$3 ! 50o. .. . r $37 1 501 - $50 000 0 4 $500 - $62 x 500 • ♦• O VER $62 j 500* **6*##*0### 6 D KN0W..••..a....0, 07 REFUSED ....•.r...•rr.•.8 1496 Sex - OBSERVATION: �O - NOT ASK} MALE + . • .................1 FEMALE /AT HOME, & 2 IF "FEMALE !t ASR: Do you work FEMALE Outside the home? WORKS OUTSYDE. , r , 3 150. ZONE 15 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE :INTRODUCTION Action by Counoil' p MEMORANDUM Endorse Modified ReJ ected City Manager Date Director of Community Development Code Amendment -- Environmental Protection Ordinance August 15, 1989 The City Council directed staff to revise the environmental protection ordinance to provide more protection for significant trees. Council also wanted a survey of other cities' tree preservation ordinances. DISCUSSION The proposed ordinance gives the City more authority to preserve significant natural features, especially large trees and woodlots. The following is a summary of major changes: 1. Section 9 -187: The ordinance would apply to anyone altering a significant natural feature. The current ordinance only applies to developments subject to Council or Community Design Review Board approval. 2a Section 9 -188 (definitions): Several definitions of significant types of natural features have been added. The size of significant or large trees is increased from 4 to 8- 12 inches in diameter. 34 Section 9 -189: The density guarantee would be revised to allow the City to reduce the maximum allowed density in the land use plan by 20% to preserve .a significant natural feature. The current ordinance does not allow the City to protect some significant natural features, particularly clusters of large trees, where their preservation would result in the loss of a developer's density. 40 Section 9 -190: A tree plan is required showing which large trees and woodlots will be preserved. The City may hire a tree expert, at the developer's expense, to evaluate this plan if needed. 5. Section 9 -191 would require a woodlot alteration permit to alter a woodlot. Currently, removal of a woodlot is legal and requires no permit. 5. Section 9 -193 (5): New standards for tree cutting and replacement have been added, as well as a fencing and signage requirement during construction. In to the proposed ordinance, a tree is included on page 10, the Eden Prairie tree on page 11 and an article from "Zoning News" ordinances on page 17. Staff is also handing on page 19,from "Lasting Woodlands" with each involving tree removal. preservation survey replacement policy on suburban tree out the attachment building permit .Several meetings were held with last spring on a. preliminary draft of this ordinance. Copies of this report will be sent to them preceding the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION .:Adopt the attached ordinance. kd \envir. ord ° .Attachments: 10 Ordinance 2. Tree Preservation Survey 3. Eden Prairie Tree Replacement Policy 4. Zoning. News 5. "Lasting Woodlands" handout 2 ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS the following revisions to Chapter 9, Article.IX of the City code- - Environmental Protection Ordinance (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1. Sections 9 - 187 through 9 - 193 (1) are amended as follows : Section -187. Applicability. This article shall apply to any person or use that would alter a signi ficant natural feature. ret.T r „ ti.,� ; ;: ' T r rzita- b Public and semi - public projects, such as streets, utilities and parks, whether built by a public ag_y_or private developer,. shall be subject to this article;, except that, the City Council may waive these requirements where there would be a greater public need for the project than to meet the requirements of this article. A public hearing shall be held before declaring such a waiver. The property owners within 350 feet of the site shall be notified at least 10 days , before the hearing Section 9 - 188. Definitions. Bl uff line: A line delineating a top of a slope with direct drainage to a protected water, connecting the points at which the slope becomes less than eighteen (18) percent. (More than one bluffline may be encountered proceeding landward from a protected water.) Critical area: The Mississippi River Corridor Area bounded by Carver Avenue, 1-4 and the city limits. Direct drainage: Drainage into a protected water without an intervening pond or wetland. .Drip line: The farthest distance around and away from the trunk of a tree that rain or dew will fall directly to the 3 Attachment 1 ground from the leaves or branches of that tree. Erosion: The general process by which soils are removed by flowing surface or subsurface water or wind. Gross soil loss: The average annual total amount of soil material carried from one acre of land by erosion. Large tree: Any healthy, tree that has. a trunk diameter four feet above the ground of at least 12 inches for trees with a mature height of at least 30 feet or at least 8 inches for trees that. have a mature height of 30 feet or less. Pipeline: An underground line of pipe including associated pumps, valves, control devices and other structures utilized for conveying liquids, gases, sewage or other finely divided solids from one point to another. Protected water: Formerly referred to as public waters, means any water defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section :105.3 7 , Subdivision 14. Retaining wall: A structure utilized to hold a slope in a position which it would not naturally remain in. Sediment: Suspended matter carried by water, sewage or other liquids. Significant natural feature a significant water body, larcae tree, a woodlot,_ a significant slope or a site of historical or archeological significance that has been recorded with the State. Significant slope: A natura s 1 ope of 25 percent or more grade over an area at least 200 feet .i -length (top to bottom) and 500 feet in width (side to side) Significant water body: A water body shown on the City Drainage Plan or a water body over one acre in.area. Slope: The inclination of the natural surface of the land from the horizontal; commonly described as a ratio of the Length to the height. Structure: Anything manufactured, constructed or erected which is normally attached to or positioned on land, .including portable structures. Substation: Any utility structure, other than lines, pipelines, Doles. or towers. Terrace: A relatively level area bordered on one or more sides by a retaining wall. 4 Utility: 0 I itu* lahlre- - 1 r'A I f-' i I i t i ckg nf- " .6. %... V &. &.& - &-- -a- %.1 N-1 El ectric , telephone, tele cable television, water, sanitar and storm sewer, solid waste, g as or similar service operations, Ve All plant g rowth, especiall trees, shrubs, mosses or g rasses* Water bod An lake, stream, pond, wetland or river. Wetland., An land which is seasonabl wet or flooded, includin all marshes, bo swamps or floodplains. Woodlot: A treed area of at least one-half acre of which at least 25% of the area includes large trees. Sec. 9-189* Pens-ia. t Effect on densit N t h d g -1 Ynp G.E16. nrenerty to the -mawiynign clnnrzity ;:;I Imiaod in tho M;;;in1 ft.0 N-1 %0 A 46 4 %.-0. A J6 A. 46 %.ALA L L if" A- %ftw i I In C3 ;4 t 0- � V %.- %.% %.- %-- a The city ma reduce the maximum allowed density where such reduction would save all or part of a significant natural feature. However, regardless of the requirements in this article, the maximum allowed density shall not be reduced below 800 of the allowed density in the citv's land use plan for multiple dwellin s. The minimum lot size shall not be increased above 12,,0 00 square feet for sin dwellin The Cit Council ma re the clusterin of dwellin in the form of town- houses, q uads, 4a-r apartments or similar uses, where it is necessar to preserve S* ficant natural features. 2ina]A f M- - %AO46 Y MS -iA6. 6 nN. F YA nL& eca e, a r- o GQnGida3--Aticjn as ,anu. i3nrlo= th i = A = t i A- DIVISION 2, SITE PLANNING REQUIRE ADMINISTRATION Section 9-190. Tree plan re A tree plan shall be required with any City application which would result in the loss of lar trees or all or part of a woodlot. This plan shall show the existing ,woodlot., identif the sizes and species of any lar trees and indicate which trees are to be removed. The applicant shall show on the tree plan and on the site, the limits of Proposed gradin activity near a lar ltree Lor woodlot to be P reserved. These -gradin limits shall not encroach upon the drip -1 ines.of the trees to be preserved in the woodlot. City staff may submit the plan to a tree expert for a recommendation. Any costs shall be paid for by the develo Sec 9 -19.1 Woodlot alteration permit. _ (a - ) A woodlot alteration application shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for any alteration of a woodlot that is not reviewed in another pplication The applicant shall submit . a t ree 4;e plan and any other information needed to determine compliance with this article. Specific requirements shall be stated on an application form in the office of the Director of Community Development. An application fee shall be established by the City Council by resolution from time -to -time. 1b) The Director of Community evelopment may approve a woodlot alteration permit which complies with this , article. The Director's decision may be appealed to the City Council in writing by_any effected warty within ten days of the Director0 written decision. Sec. 9 - 192. Conditions of Approval. The City may.reauire conditions of approval to insure compliance with this article. DIVISION 3o APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 9-191 193 , Approval �-° '^' �n arirr ^t�a standards Any request to alter a significant natural feature must meet th e followinca standards: (1) General standards. a. . All plans and the The conduct of all grading, landscaping, structure placement,, street routing shall be consistent with a .W.] "a °"t °„ _ °rte „ G° ^f the City's comprehensive plan, and for development in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area, the Maplewood Critical Area Plan. b. The proposed development shall not lessen existing public access to and along a protected water. C* The proposed development shall be designed, constructed and maintained to avoid causing: 1, 2. water 3. 4. I a=atad Erosion. Pollution, contamination or siltation of bodies or storm sewers. Flooding. Ground water contamination. 0 5* Alteration of significant natural features . d. Development shall not substantially diminish the scientific, historical, educational, recreational or aesthetic value of unique natural areas, a..Mad ' plants and animals, which are registered with the state as such, and shall not substantially alter their reproductive cycles. of tho cri G S. ee views of protected waters from buildings or public streets shall not be impaired by the placement of advertising signs. Section 21 The current Subsection 191 (5), now 193 (5),, is amended as follows: (5) Trees. a. Development shall be designed to preserve lar e trees and woodlots, where such preservation would not effect the public health, safety or welfare. ha-a 3l=hu The City may prohibit removal of all or part of a woodlot or large tree. This decision shall be based on, but not limited to the following criteria: 1. Size 20 Species, health and attractiveness of the trees, including: _(a) sensitivity to disease. fib) life span. (c) nuisance characteristics (d) sensitivity to site grading_ 3. Potential for transplanting. 40 Need for thinning a woodlot. 50 Effect on the functioning of a development. s. The public heal_, safety and welfare. b. If large trees are cut, the density of trees shall be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to raise the density above ten (10) trees per acre, unless part of a required planting screen. ter, .tx t=GG ram„ ==C3 to 7 Mha 4a • ner that c,bT If any large tree in a woodlot is cut, damaaed or the area within the tree's driDline has been encroached upon by grading equipment without City authorization, the City may reauire planting of a new tree and a fine. Thelfine shall be set by City resolution from time -to- time. In addition, if the City determines that a damaged tree will probably not survive, it shall be removed by the developer_ d.cr-w- Any trees required to be planted shall be varied in species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area, shall not include any,_species under disease epidemic and shall be hardy under local conditions._ Trees shall be at least 2 1/2 inches in diameter for deciduous trees and eight feet tall for coniferous trees, e.d-w- Any trees required to be planted shall be replaced if they die or appear to be dying within one year of planting f. Before anv construction or grading takes place, snowfencing or erosion control fencing shall be Dlaced around the borders, of woodlots or the driplines of larvae trees to be preserved. Sicans shall be placed along this fence line prohibiting grading beyond the fence line, Section.3. DIVISION 3. UTILITIES AND STREETS is hereby renumbered to DIVISION 4. Secs. 9- 192.utilities and 9 -193 streets are hereby renumbered to Secs. 9 -194 and 9 -195. There are no other revisions to these sections, Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication, v Passed by the Maplewood City Council,on 198 . Attest: City Clerk E Ayes-- Nays-- Mayor .Staff surveyed 26 suburban cities. Circle Pines was also included at the City Council^s request. Each city was asked for their tree ation requirements. Only two cities, Burnsville and Eden Prairie, have city-wide tree preservation ordinances. - Th e -fo llowing cities have no tree preservation ordinances: Coon R apids, Plymouth, Brooklyn Center, Fridley, Blaine, Crystal , New Brighton, New Hope, Apple Valley,, South St. Psul, Maple Grove, .Columbia Heights, West St. Paul, Shoreview, North St. Paul , -Dakdale Woodbury, Newport, Little Canada, and Circle Pines. The following cities have a limited tree preservation ordinance: Roseville requires aconditi`aluse permit to Cut trees with at last_ a 6-inch'diameter in ehoreland areas. Cottage Grove ihas ax similar ordinance to Maplewood, but it only applies to designated critical area land along the Mississippi River. The following cities have a city-wide tree preservation ordinance: Burnsvi has a similar ordinance to Maplewood, except that any tree with a diameter of at loaast 2-1/2 inches that is cut must be replaced, up to a maximum of 15 trees per acre. Vadnais Heights requires tree preservation, but has no specific m^e' 'irements or required replanting. Eden Prairie has the most detailed tree replacement policy of any of the cities surveyed. A copy is attached. It appears to be � if'iCult and time-consuming to administer because of its 1comp]exity. White Bear Lake is considering an ordinance to regulate cutting trees 6 inches or. more in diameter, 1 Attachment 2 TREE REPLACEMENT POLICY A. PURPOSE r ej."'. It is the intent and desire of the City to protect, preserve, and enhance the natural environment and beauty of Eden Prairie by encouraging the 9 9 - resourceful and prudent development of our existing woodland areas. 'To create an incentive for good planning, design, and development, the Tree Replacement Policy shall serve as a basis for project review in the promotion of tree preservation and/or determining the required replacement of in' significant fi c ant trees. When reviewing new development projects, either commercial or residential, City Staff attempts through design to preserve and protect natural site Characteristics such as wooded areas, hills, and ponds. However, it is not always possible and /or feasible to save 100% of any existing significant natural site characteristic. Because of this, a tree replacement been developed. of is has p y Be BACKGROUND In developing the Tree Replacement Policy, Staff had to determine the following items: 1. Define significant tree. A significant tree is defined as a tree of 12 inches in diameter or greater whose mature height will be greater than 30 feet (examples: oak, maple, basswood, etc.) or a tree of 8 inches in diameter or more hose mature • height is usually less than 30 feet (examples: ironwood, cedar /juniper, etc.). 2. Which species of trees shall be replaced%. Deciduous hardwood trees which shall be replaced includes oak, maple, basswood, ash, ironwood, etc.. In addition, coniferous trees shall also be replaced if they meet the specific size requirement. Diseased trees shall not be subject to tree replacement,, It i s the e re spon s i bl i ty of the developer to submit * a certified tree inventory depicting: a. The size, species, and condition of all trees greater than 12 inches, in diameter whose mature height will be greater than 30 feet (examples: oak, maple, basswood, ash, Colorado Spruce, etc.) . b. The size, species, and condition of all trees greater than 8 inches in diameter whose mature height is usually less than 30 feet (examples: ironwood, cedar /juniper, etc.). 11 Attachment 3 Based on this tree inventory, the actual tree loss will be calculated and the amount of replacement determined. To reduce the amount of tree replacement required, the proponent may opt to relocate those trees which are suitable. It will be the responsibility of the City Forester to make the final determination as to the number and types of trees which shall be replaced and/or relocated. 30 - At what point (percentage) is a significant wooded area substantially altered by tree removal. For a wooded site, short of acquisition by the City., some tree removal is probably unavoidable and reasonable to expect as a P art of development of the land. By only replacing significant trees, a substantial amount of vegetation under this size could be removed without replacement. This fact alone allows considerable latitude iii the reasonable development of property. Generally, the smaller the percentage of the overall wooded P ortion of the. site that is removed, the less the change in the character of this site; and therefore, the less the percentage of replacement P necessary to preserve the character of the site. The larger the percentage of removal of trees of the total wooded area the greater the change in the character of the site and the larger the percentage of tree replacement required to help mitigate the change in site ch aracter. Staff, therefore, suggests that for any removal of the significant trees on a site, a proportion of the trees shall be replaced on a diameter (caliper) inch for diameter inch basis. C. TREE REPLACEMENT The first loo caliper inches of tree removal from a site shall be replaced 1009 with the remaining caliper inches replaced on a proportionate basis. The proportion of tree replacement shall diminish, from 1009 replacement at 609 loss down at a constant rate to the 100 '"caliper inch mark. Trees removed outside of an approved construction plan would continue to be replaced at 1009 on an area inch per area inch basis. 1. Tree Replacement Calculations The amount of tree replacement is based upon the total amount of caliper inches of significant trees removed from the site divided by the total amount of caliper inches of significant trees on-site, General provisions of this policy include: a. The first 100 caliper inches removed from any site shall be replaced 100 percent. b. If the percent of caliper inches removed is greater than or equal to 60 percent, the caliper inch replacement shall be 100 percent. 12 4 2. Tree Replacement Formula Total Cal iper Inches RemoVPd .= Percent Caliper Inches Removed Total Cal iper Inches Percent Caliper Inches Removed x Tree Replacement Factor (1.66) _ .Percent Tree Replacement Total Caliper Inches Removed - 100 = Total Caliper Inches Replaced by Percentage (Total Caliper Inches Replaced by Percentage x Percent Tree Replacement) + 100 = Total Caliper Inch Replacement Examples ir a. 95 Caliper Inches Removed 400 Total Caliper Inches .95 = 23.75% Regardless of percentage, because the total amount of tree removal is less than or equal to 100, tree replacement shall be 100% or 95 caliper inches. b. 367 Caliper Inches Removed 743 Total Caliper Inches 367 = 49.39% 49-.39% x 1-.66 = 81.98% 367 - 100 = 267 (267- x 81.98 %) + 100 = 318.88 or 319 Caliper Inches Replaced c. 811 Caliper Inces Removed 923 Total Caliper Inches 811 = 87.86% Because the percentage of trees removed is greater than or equal to 60 %, the amount of tree replacement shall be 100% or 811 caliper inches. 3. `Replacement Locations Once the amount of tree replacement has been determined, the proponent will be required to submit a landscape plan detailing the location, type, and size of trees to be replaced. This plan will be required prior to first reading by the City Council. 13 ar Locations in which tree replacement shall occur are as follows: as Site restoration areas including steep slopes. bo Lot yard areas. C o Ou t l of s or common areas, d. Buffering between different land use and /or activities. e. Entrance monuments. f• Adjacent park or community open space (shall be coordinated by the Planning Staff and the Community Services Staff) . 40 Sizes and Types The minimum size of trees which shall b ' e given v en credit t for tree repl acement are a 3 deciduous tree or an 8' coniferous tree, except th in steep slope restorati usi ng 2 1/ 2 11 size trees credit will be given. No replacement credit will be iven for shrubs or n g ornamental trees. The attached list st describes the types of trees su itable to be planted i n Eden Prairie. Trees designated for. replacement shall be of a similar variety of the tree which were removed when applicable and /or available. 00 ENFORCEMENT hn Multi- , family, Office, Commercial or Industrial developments, the developer will be required to follow normal landscape bonding procedures as described in the City of Eden Prairie's Landscape /Screening Procedures and Requirements. In Single Family Residential subdivisions, the procedure shall be as fol lows To determin the cost of the trees to be replaced, the er develo s hould ei ther provide p p vie the City with a contract for the of the trees or two nursery estimates. If a developer fails to give nursery estimates or provide the City with a copy of an actual contract - for installation of the trees, then the City will estimate based on it s knowledge of the approximate price per cal inch to determine the total cost. 2. Proponent will be required to submit surety at 1 1/2 times the cost of the tree replacement. Surety shall either be a bond, letter of credit, cash, or an assurance of an escrow with a title company, Y 3. The City will provide one landscape inspection each y ear ( u sually P y in the fall) for each individual - project.. At that time, the amount of landscaping installed will be determined. One complete rowi n � i 9 g season after the 1st inspection a subsequent bond amount will be released if in compliance with the developer's agreement and City Code. The balance of the surety will be retained by the City as a guarantee for tree replacement and /or completion. .14 s ' Should any of the landscaping material not be installed, the City will retain the associated bond amount which shall be placed into a Natural Resources Fund. The purpose of the Natural Resources Fund shall include but not limited to the purchase of landscaping to be placed within the adjace ne ighborhood or community park. In addition to the number of trees being removed as art of construction, ion, the propone will also be liable for the replacement of those trees directly at or near the construction limits which may die as a direct. ..result of this construct activity. In order to protect the City and future homeowner against additional tree loss, the proponent will be required to bond for those trees which have been designated as being saved but due to their proximity to any construction activi may not survive. The number er of caliper inches of "questionable" trees shall be ca and a subsequent bond amount included as part of the tree replacement bond. At th time of final inspection for the replacement trees, these wil ue st io nab l e" trees 1 al b � q so a inspected. After this inspection, the proponent will be contacted regarding any additional tree replacement and /or timing for the bond release. 15 V SHADE TREES - large tree + ' s 30 feet mature hei ht Norway Maple - Acer pl atano i des cultivars 'Cleveland' Red Maple - Acer rubrum cul ti ears - 'Northwood'. ' Fi red ' ance S Queen Silver Maple e p ( seedless) - Acer sacchari num 'Silver Queen Sugar Maple - Acer saccharum cul i tva r "Green .Mountain' River Birch - Betul a ni gra flackberry - Cel ti s occidental i s -� Black Ash - Fraximus ni 9 ra .4reen Ash - Fra x i n u s penn syl va n i ca cul tivars - "Newport'. 'Berg 'Marshall all s Seedl Patmore, 'Summit' Ginkgo - Ginkgo biloba (male onl Honeyl - Gl endi tsia tricanthos inermi . s -- Kentucky Coffeetree - 1 Gymnocladus, dioicus Ironwood - Os trya virganiara . White Oak - Quercus al ba Swamp White Oak - Quercus bicol . Pin flak - � . Quereu s pa l ustri s Northern Red Oak - Quercus rub Q ra American Linden - Til i americana Li ttl el ea f Linden - Ti 1 i a - corda to cul ti ears ' Gl enl even' , '.Greens i r ' p e Redmond Linden - Ti 1 i a amer i ca na 'Redmond' loni fer Trees .Balsam Fir - Abi es balsa mea Whi Fir - Abi es concol or Eu ropean Larch - Larix decidua Black Hills Spruce - Picea lauca 'Den g sato ' Austrian Pine - Pinus nigra Ponderosa Pine - Pinus ponderosa 'Norway Pine - Pinus resinosa Scotc Pine - Pinus s Y l vestris White Pine - Pinus strobus Douglas Fir _ Pseudotsu a menz i es i i Hemlock - Tsu Canadian 9 ga canadensi s 16 A Tree Grows in Suburbia In Pinellas County, Florida, before the county adopted a tree Preservation code, builders would market new homes by showing off a model with extensive landscaping and large trees. Latcr, after all the home sites were sold off, builders would clear the remaining tracts, put up homes and tell stunned homebuyers that landscaping was their responsibility. Such clear- cutting practices are not unique to Florida. A recent study by Tree Atlanta, a conservation group, shows that the metropolitan area Loses the equivalent of up to 50 acres of woodlands per day during the prime building season. And the U .S. I)eptartment of Agriculture estimates that many of the Washington, D.C., suburbs have lost up to half of their woodlands over the last 30 years. (See .graph.) The continued loss of woodlands has forced many cities to adopt ordinances to protect trees; from indiscriminate clearing for land development. A large number of tree protection ordinances were enacted during the 1970s. However, many of these codes did not work out. Many cities did not have adequate staff to police the protection of trees. They required developers to identify large trees on site plans but were unable to determine whether trees were actually saved. Some cities also found that grading activities and utility excavations later killed those trees that were supposed to be saved. Many cities also discovered that it was politically infeasible to adopt strong ordinances that might stop development or require modifications of plans in order to protect trees. The second generation of tree protection ordinances simplifies es the process of tree preservations and gocs lurther than the 1970s codes. The cities featured below all have good tree preservation programs. They all conduct inspections, many have -staff or consulting arborists, and all have experience in the adminis of tree protection codes. Lake Forest, Illinois This affluent suburb on Chicago's North Shore has taken tree preservation seriously for a long time. For the last nine years, it.has been designated a "Tree City" by the National Arbor Day Foundation. In 1987, the city's tree protection gained national attention following a. fight between Mr. 'T`, the television actor, and the City council. Immediately after moving to Lake Forest, Mr. T chopped down over 100 oak trees on his estate, reportedly to relieve allergies. The city council condemned the action as "outrageous destruction." At the time, Lake Forest's tree preservation code applied only to new developments and, therefore, did not apply to Mr. T's property. The city's code now prohibits the mass removal of trees from all new building sites and controls the removal of existing. trees from front yards within 35 feet of the road right - of -way. The controls on clearing of construction sites apply to all of the city's buildable lots and to the protection of all trees at least 12 inches in diameter at breast height. Trees may be removed in a "construction area" that includes the building 17 envelope, driveways, and utility lines. Builders must stake out a building envelope plus 20 feet, accessways, and areas for utility trenches. All large trees outside of this area must be preserved. To protect existing trees, the city's code establishes a "preservation area" extending 3.5 feet in depth along any lot line facing a public street. Permits are required for the removal of any trees 12 inches in diameter or larger within this area. Pcrmits may be granted if the tree is discascd, dead, or dying, or if tree preservation would create an economic hardship on the property owner. Even if such permits are granted, the owner may be required, at the discretion of the director old parks, forestry, and public works, to rc:plac:c: those se trees reiiloved with others no less than four inches in diameter. Fulton County, Georgia The county board of commissioners adopted a tree preservation ordinance in 1985. The code applies to all new development except for single - family horde construction. According to Edward Macie, Fulton County Arborist, the ordinance has been highly effective in protecting thousands of existing trees and requiring the planting of tens of thousands of new trees. According to Macie, flexibility has been the key ingredient to the county's protection program. As cede administrator, lie Acres of Trees in Selected Areas of Suburban Washington 200 W11 100 50 Anne Prince Arundel Georges Fairfax County County County Source: U.S. Forest Scrvice Attachment 4 s t t,�.t► o 00 ° o 0 0 0 C\ C" O\ CIN I t ��A Wi has bcen'given discretion in negotiating which trees must be protected fleed wllic:h nu)y be rcinoved. Tilc code does nm require tlwt all trees be preserved, but, when trees are removed, they must be replaced. The tree protection criteria apply to any land- cicarin , g grading, or construction activities. Tree protection and Landscape plans must be submitted with other construction plans and must show which trees will be preserved, rllcthods of guarding trees during construction, proposed utility iretiches,. and areas to be graded or landscaped. The protection of trees does not end with the submission of plans in Fulton County. Construction activities must be altered to limit the amount of grading or clearing within the vicinity of .protected trees, These trees must be fatted off to keep llcavy .equipment from inadvertently damaging a trcc's root system. The.protected area includes all the area beneath the tree's canopy drip line. The drip line is a vertical line extending from the outer surface of a tree's branch tips down to the ground. . Hinton dead Island, South Carolina Hilton Head's ordinance is geared not only to preservin g trees but also to maintaining the diversity of tree species on the island. Developers are required to do a complete count of all trees on a site.and document their size and species. The results of the count are used to calculate the number of trees that must be preserved, based on a minimum standard of 900 adjusted caliper inches of trees per acre of pervious surface area. The ordinance also establishes the mix of species that must be retained on the site. The island's goal is to maintain the approximate composition of tree species that existed on the undisturbed.site. For example, a developer cannot destroy a stand of oak trees unless there are enough remaining hardwoods to provide the appropriate balance of hardwood trees to the other types of trees on the site. The town's code also addresses the problem of lots that were cleared of trees years ago but never developed. Dcvclopers of these sites are required to plant trees to meet a minimum .number of tree caliper inches per acre. Finally, the ordinance requires individual honlcowncrs to - maint yin the trees on their lot. Sally Krcbs, tllc town's natural resource coordinator, spends two days a week doing inspections of sites. "If a tree dies or is hit by a car, it's got to be replaced— period." Agoura Hills, California In response to the removal of vast numbers of oak trees in Los Angeles County, the city of Agoura Hills passed strict oak preservation guidelines that prevent evert the pruning of oak tree limbs larger than two inches in diameter without an oak tree permit. The ordinance also'requires a permit for the removal of any oak tree. Susan Kelsey, Agoura Hills' oak tree consultant, notes that the planning commission will approve rcmoval only when reasonable use of 111c site would be completely inhibited by preservation of the trces. Four new oaks must be planted for each oak that is removed. During construction, all oak trees must be surrounded by a five- foot -Iiigh chain link fence placed at least 15 feet beyond .:the trunk. If a proposed building or sidewalk encroaches into this protection zone, the city's oak tree consultant must be on the site. at all times that work in the protectcd zone is being .done. 111 �.t 'Jlllc` C. ISc`S, bollltll I1 :1ve had io tic' trides3g dUriilL construction in order to save oaks. Kelsey paints out that - over the last 100 years, there's been incredible, intentional devastation of the oaks. Now, we've recognized the 1111 porta ncc of s aving our natural resourc)cs." $ West Bloomfield 'I mice N►►%•i, Michigan Ii► Michigan. ct)nlnl) lities :►►c• t,)king "tells Io p1c..'C► ve Woodland arras. \Vcst Bloomfield 'l'ownshil) :ind Novi lim-c• designated woodland areas onofficial WOOLIland neaps. m Dcti•elopcn i t that takes place n thcsc areas must comply \% the woodlands protection ordinance. In NVcst Bloomfieid. the extent to which do \?cl()pinc:nt n1,1N• encroach into the woodland area depends mi tilt• ecc)I()gic,11 .tic•rtsiti� it }' t�1t1)(• aica. I:or cac'h prolwsetl tievc•it)l1111c►)t, 1110 township's L\•o )dland rc\'icw board deterinincs a •'tulcr,)nce point " —tllc number of trees that can be rcrllovcd Witlluut destroying the woodland character of the site. In areas that Have excellent soils and are 1)Opulate(I I)y f,)st- growing species of tree~, the bt):Ird Irl:►y pel tilt• rc•n)t�� of to 50 percent of the trees on the site. I lowcver, ill delicate ecological areas, the board may restrict this removal to dilly 10 percent of the total number of trees. Nori's protects %\ �dland areas 1)) rc.�(lucir)g required lot sizes and allowing cluster devc1opnle*111 \\•heel the majority of the property is within a bona fide woodland arc,►. For example, in the town's residential estate district • tilt.• required lot sizes can be rctluccd frmii onc• acrc to onc thi►(l acre \% \vooded area «'ill t)e preserved. Both the Nest Bloonlficld and Novi ordinanccs impulse monetary penalties on property owners found to havc violated the woodland protection regulations. `Vcst Bloomfield also requires that devclopers post a band equal to 60 per (rce on the site as a condition of sitc plan approval. If the dcvcl()1)cr dcstroys trees in excess of the number allowed, the bond moncyis devoted to supplcmcntal landscaping of the site. Toin Bird, planning director for West Bloomfield, says that this step is taken as a last resort. "The best enforcement illech 11 iS aIlisi ' , to maintain a vigilance on the property throughout the dcvclopmcnt process." In recent years, conlnlunitics have developed sc)phisticatc•tl approaches to protecting trees from both the bulldozer and the overly exuberant residential tree pruner. Recent curies denionstratc innov and flexiblity in land (lcvc•IOpi►)cnt rcgulatiOtls in the interest orpreserving trees. The tree ordinance in Bellevue. NVashington, perinks ill) it),., 1 U i)c•rcent reduction in the number of required parking spades for tllc retention of over 15 percent of the significant trees on site. In Orlando, Florida, the city council relay require a pro poscd subdivision to cluster homes in order to protect the ti oil site. Finally, Pleasant Ifill, California, has found that public relation techniques, such as the awarding of tree preservation plaques, greatly enhance public support for tree protection. Lake Comity, Ill., Adopts Perfori auce Zo uiiig Last month, Lake County adopted a new perfornialice Z011Ing ordinance for the 200 square miles of unincorporated iand ill the county. In a 20 to 3 vote, the county board endorsed the controversial ordinance that has been over five years in the making. The performance Zoning concept «•as irltr()cllrced ill County by Lane henditi, Ilse c•otrn(y*s f Ormer director of 1 The Il l'o.1cl virdirl.ince th it apivar: ill Kc nJ; %•'s 1"L bt,X)k, Performance Loring. was origi nall}� prepared for adoption in Lake County. Jio\c•cvcr, the count }• dcl,l }•cd approval of the nc%c• zoning code bccauSc Of the ()t)JCcti()I)s () f , number of muilic•ipalitics. LASTING WOODLANDS I�RESENTS: A Dozen Very Basic Things Which Developers. and Builders Should Know in Order to Avoid Killing Trees (and to avoid the lawsuits that would result from such killings) 1. ..The roots are the most important part of a tree. 2. Tree roots must have oxygen(!) in order to function. Covering roots with dirt or water can deprive roots of vital oxygen supplies, especially roots of oak trees. 3. The key feeder roots of most trees (especially of oak trees) are in the top 6 -12 in. of soil. The myth of "deep rooted trees" is just that: a myth. Even side roots from the short "iap root" of an oak slant upward to get to oxygen and rain water. 4. The feeder roots of trees are mostly in a large, shallow disc that is 2 -4 times the area covered by the crown. In other words, the roots usually extend far beyond the branches! S. Grading dirt over the feeder roots of trees anywhere under their branches (and often beyond) suffocates the feeder roots and kills all or most of the crown in 1 -3 years. b. Grading dirt away from the root zone of trees removes their feeder roots and does . great injury to the crown within 1 -3 years. It kills the nearly invisible hair roots. 70 If you can see roots of a tree which you have cut, you have already done considerable damage to the tree: it is like seeing a pulsing artery in a flesh cut on a human. 8. Compaction of soil .under trees (especially by bulldozers working an area, and by repeated parking of cars, pickups and trucks by construction people) is almost as deadly to trees as covering their roots with soil. The compaction deprives the hair roots of oxygen. 9. .Building a protecting "tree well" (e.g. a stone wall) around the trunk of a tree while covering the surrounding area with dirt is a fool's project. It does no good at all. 10. Trenching to install utilities cuts a tree's roots. Multiple trenches can sever most of a tree's roots. Remember, it is the roots of a tree, not its top, which are most important. 11. changing grades so that temporary or permanent ponding of water occurs usually results in suffocation of all roots in the pond due to lack of oxygen, and the trees die. 12. Wounding oak trunks and branches any time from early spring to late summer usually results in oak wilt infecting the tree in areas where oak wilt disease exists. The .infection will usually s pread throug grafted roots sterns to the whole clum of oak trees Y p g Y p surrounding the infected tree. Bulldozers and "Bobcats" easily create wounds in oaks. Prepared by Donald C. Willeke, Attorney at Law, Willeke & Daniels, 201 Ridgewood Avenge, Minneapolis, MN. Mr. Willeke is Chairman of the Minnesota State Shade Tree Advisory Committee. He is a Director of the American Forestry Association and of Lasting Woodlands. Inc. Lasting Woodlands, Inc. is a non-profit, corporation. Call Chris Siems, President, at 612 - 439 -3356. 19 Attachment 5 Construction Damage Prevention: On -Site Strategies 4 On this page we lay out a series of steps that are essential to construction site tree preservation. These steps should become an integral part of the building process. Unfortunately (fortunatetyfor usforest- lovers!), each woods is different and generates its own questions pertaining to individual tree- tolerances. For example: Which tree blocks should be saved? How should traffic be directed on the site? These questions are best answered by a qualified professional consultant. The help of a consultant often pays for uself by saving a builder's valuable time and by increasing property values. Tree preservation can be viewed as a jour step process. Each step should be integrated into every building project. 1. Develop a lot plan that pinpoints tree blocks to be preserved. The builder who says, "I'll try to save as many trees as I can" will inevitably see one tree after another damaged or destroyed due to "accidents" or "miscommunications." Know what you are trying to accomplish and which tree blocks you want to preserve before any portion of the construction project begins. The expertise of a consultant is especially valuable during this phase. 2. Partition off designated areas with snow fencing, flagging, and signs. s Block off the area you wish to reserve with snow. fencing and flagging. Post r ,Y P . signs that state that there is to be no filling, scraping, or trenching of the soil , and no drivin g or p arking in these des areas. This may seem somewhat severe but it is the P g g only sure way to let contractors and buyers know that you are serious about preserving those trees. A side benefit of your efforts .is the positive image it will project, it says that you are taking every precaution to preserve trees. 3. Explicitly communi instructions to every contractor on the site. Nearly every builder we've spoken to voices one common problem: It's impossible td be on the site every second, and it only takes one contractor to miss the signals and damage designated tree blocks. There are two ways to combat this problem. Conspicuous fencing and signage make acceptable traffic flow and on -site practices very clear to every contractor entering the site. Second, if possible, tree preservation practices should be a written component in the contract with each contractor. Once again this seems somewhat Po .harsh but it goes a long way toward getting the desired results. 4. Monitor the health and vigor of trees during and after construction. Even the most woodland- sensitive construction can place trees under some stress, and the effects of this stress sometimes aren't apparent immediately. Check the health of served trees periodically to make sure the have maintained their vigor. wilting le .pre. Pe Y Y leaves is the first sign of construction damage. If this occurs, contact a tree -care expert innmediately. Pnce again, this is a great way to make it clear to everyone that you are serious about saving trees. It is also one step you can take to avoid construction damage liability. These steps. may seem like they entail a lot of extra work, but when you integrate therm into your regular building process, they will become a routine part of each building project. What's what we're striving for: A network of builders for whom tree preservation comes as natwrally as g or sheathing. -- ote: Eachfuture issue of wi I contain an article that more t roughly develops the steps and ideas dressed in this piece. If you have any questions about construction damage, please call Christian Siems at 439 -3356. We can link you up with professionals that can help you. That's what our network is for! n 0 c 0 0 C� a� cro 20 . F�� Construction Damage UAW Straight tX * Talk . by Donald C. Willeke, Attorney and Counselor at Law ' -and a Director of the American Forestry Association Developers and contractors face a potentially expensive problem if they disregard the age which can occur when homes are built on wooded lots. Often nonsuspecting homebuyers purchase a newly constructed home on a lot containing what appear to be arge, healthy trees. Then, to their dismay, in a year or two some of the trees start to show .signs of distress: branches die, and sometimes whole trees collapse in mid - season. The homeowners' first impulse is to talk to their city forester or to call some tree care company. From such tree experts they get the bad news: "Your tree roots were buried with new fill, and the trees are `goners. The standard reaction of these homeowners is fast to get very angry at the builder who sold them the.home or did the construction, and then to go out, get a lawyer and sue. Liability of builders to homeowners for the loss is based upon several theories. ( 1) That the builder knew or should have known that damage would result to the trees from construction activities but acted negligently. It is no defense that the builders did not in fact know. General Motors was supposed to know that Corvairs could blow up. Building cars is its business, and it is supposed to know how to do the job right. (2) That the builder knew of the ge or potential damage and did not tell the nonsusp g buyers. This is, to use the unpleasant legal terns, simply "fraud." (3) That the builder breached the contract he or she had with the homeowners, wither to build the home properly, or to sell them an already constructed home with what appeared to be healthy trees on the property. (4) That the builder violated consumer protection laws in selling the homeowners a defective product, or "hoodwinked" the homeowners by neglecting to tell them that the produc had a latent defect that would only show up at a later date. Liability of the - builder (on any of the above counts) can be quite expensive, Several builders have had to pay sums equal to the price of the lot on which the home stood. some of the builders have been able to bring in excavating contractors and make them share some of the liability, but it is still the builder's primary responsibility to know how to "do it right" and then to follow through and actually see that it is done right. Failure to observe that simple rule can be very, very expensive. One lawsuit (and the legal :fees a builder has to pay for defense) can wipe out the profit on many homes. 21 A Shelter. Minneapolis S Saturday June 7/1986 11A ..N 64 ............ ,�a�„C' �• �..,��( ' + .Its^ ±'� 1 +fy`�•��ii�� , ♦ at��t�� Cr, .��/ •r ,•1 �A�'.• 'r•�''rb�1.�t•,•• "`ij�.�,Tt�•�1 +��. �l rF ♦ �` � , 'tf�l► tt� to, ,,•x.A ti� U��.'u.'�7!Y;�!��i �� }Grp ^: iril. �; rt. i■` �" ��k 'f;LfT�i�!�h`�'1��l'�►,�:.�ti�rf ti 1 /11 f I A T 4 4 L V is ZVW r,*;u 4 s V. P: :14 Staf Photo by Donna Terek Of the 14 trees that once shaded Andrea and Gordon Weber's lot, all that remains Is the woodpile on which their childron are pla i".uoni..airi can Kill UIU re U ti -in (by -leading ndverils The narrowin rate R ap added to her about misleading doubts. since she alread had a loan lenders or builders)," said Herschel Ilie rates dipped below 10 I)r[Tv" Ninrch, the lowest In neatl e • at 12k' percent — "not Dad she Elkin_ . chief of the consumer law I i smaye home buyers learn ... , "The nppy �A•lth ille were h "but some homeowners and surprisin disappointment. " "We he "It V 41, B In g rid Sandstrom the wide canopies of I 4'oa k and ash were heartsick," said. y trees with truW 18. to 30 Inches In was almost like a loss of a famil Staff Writer., "I haven't run across an complaints bou or refinanced homes when diameter, member when the trees came f Gordon and Andrea Weber had down. We lost their shade and we that lost our The trees went �1 �► 11YUry b4 Ll saved a lon time for their dream When the leaves came out privac house. The shopped carefull for a sprin their lot looked just as the across the back of our lot at the %1; , � "ttif d said It would — like a bottom of a hill. Now when we sit builder had lot that would g ive their three on our deck, ever behind us on room to pla with trees park, Gordon Weber said. But b v children " W : x T �,, the next sprin the beautiful trees the hill Is lookin down ri at us. bi enou to shade the house and b land r were dead, killed a y ard., What happened to the Webers Is not , " i. development contrn*ctor who, r% 1H If It, r % Y ..' ' on In the Twin Cities area. .1.4 The found just the ri spot In, .,exp erLs later determined, had plied uncommon '., four to six feet deep around tht I , %A the back When the Webers' house was under conRtruction, b fill dirt. Maple Grove and, In the winter of '.0 1981,.their house was b.ullt under� 'J�,.trees,,suffocatIng their roots.* I Trees continued on pa 2S had a row of lar trees all later killed ie would-be home bu refinancerl -in (by -leading ndverils The narrowin rate R ap added to her about misleading doubts. since she alread had a loan lenders or builders)," said Herschel Ilie rates dipped below 10 I)r[Tv" Ninrch, the lowest In neatl e • at 12k' percent — "not Dad she Elkin_ . chief of the consumer law I y ears. noted. But it's the cost of refinancin section of the state attorne g oner- • - and financing that IS discouraging al's office. "but I am hearin n lot of "The nppy �A•lth ille were h "but some homeowners and surprisin disappointment. " rates." he siid, points and of fees added so subs(anliall to • others. • lie has heard from people who "I haven't run across an complaints bou or refinanced homes when Fees continued on po 3S �1 �► 11YUry r-Ir-400,11% r ' u '� ••. , ar •• • , • ' .f r Lovcly town humes arc adjacent to park wll paths. Features 213R's, 2Vi baths, a•21k•out f d.< •, .• ;,,;`+ ; ' Y ^ • , • r� ` ^i tK •• garage. near Downtown on bus line. Priccd fro �:' •` * " , ;''� ��. ' tr' .;,•- �- .; Dlrcctlons: Cty. ltd. 18 to Mcdlcrnc Lk. Rd t:: a >» •,� •� ' ` y�. �'� •..4!L ► Hours: Opcn Sat. thru Tht Othcr times by appoint :':�° o • i •,. - ;.- r ^r `' (• ' Phi SA NT 2426 Ni Gi ♦ A4 �' ,� , <<.N•.•; � �' :: T•t'� �w'� , :.�;,� � ' :"•,•' ` ..y • yid ' " _ 7t ^^-•� • "��a~ �,� � � �• � `'_X"'T . _ y 7+A fit' t • +I � �• y �' ♦ . c •r :•'. " '7 j '" .. - GL Qll tti qty 111 �' • p; t r IY ~3 R•Z p f 1, ?. aw' }', ► !► • \ �• •► '� � 1 a ,.. •%:t l.r *7. t , 1� i�' Y � �'R � n �ZR• , t. �. 't <`�i • T +_ '�J'� i • i. � � J 7 !! .'�jy'`yS• • a +� ' � i j „ � +'�.f�1 v. ��..��,..� ��f.r,:f ."'" �' , �� • �' k ,,,r .. r : S ••� ,.�}� .. a� Yj ►�\ :F i(= � ` ,. '.'. r,5':; .M},. �IiM•� �� ''�.vI .t< i � i � y 4 4 1 a1J�s'''�„ ; 4• .�ii• j lZ��jt , lie { ;... *�}!'�.,.•' '.! • i � �'�"` �.+.4,� �. � .i +' r '� , • � , , � ��.. '� B _J Eff I if. f5 Ga A:. ✓ �<f 1,.lrlj�T< 1 W 1.� ■r��#�, ' ,� t •` r -•i f, � 1� v *. '• •••M`:) � •� �•� \ 1 ' �!• i � � Iii, �• ' »,;.� �. ,,,fir► 1s.. , Now ou can enjoy the relaxing atmospher ••.K': .. . �h.• .7 •�. Yi , :,.. a�;� i- •.:�•,,,,�L;., f1M,�,,,�,�y,r "' � � � � 'y too Y "'jt;�Y ;; *•'�`:i; a 14 ht Lakeside Court home built by Mary Anderson. ♦ lA, 1 I ; , / .. , ;,. 1 Mary Anderson homes are for discriminating buye 7777 ? ' '' 11 • li.�r•wi �' • v �i. • •+ • �.'•*••+'f' r ,,�, v •�.r.�. ^� �. t; :• , ,� t,'� ., ; ;� � ! I. s ; • �' to using only duality materials, And when it comes • ''� •' •'k "" r 1` "' �" ♦ Rheem Is the worlds largest makes of gas water hea • `,� + t +�t _ and quality learn up for a dependable, energy elf �►';• 1 ` �k' `'' ;,�: '"''; �S » *.ti• ;`�'j:y Models in Lakeside Courts, Plymouth, , � y : :y •v�..:�t•.�.1.: t • , ,•r . .. ~f,,...'�sd � '� .t. a Co u are op en 1 :1 �, �� Tr';r -�' %" •= - Monda throu h Friday. There are a few lake I. available, FROM $ 100,000. : • s . ''`�'a ° ''�:'i z - �'�- � c • '� , s , � ' .Pr': �'.,' ;1R -.� '.. ".,! �••"��+ • ..?' ' �yP�,"'T` - ' �` • � ` •Y.- /�•� . .�� y�,�. '"r , ►.�li','�3 • t '. ..��.� +� 4•�" ' �. ,.•+•�.. �`''' -..' .' i• •�� 4 . Call Mert Jacobson 553 -1101 a. • a �� : • i• +. 7• R1I ii .�' Y•r,1 ? •0 y� } 1•'C • �-, •l • �y.., ►. J' M • }' .' s• :s»u �{: %,� �� .�i�r +r�:fa �•?� r±'•)).�;`.Z••�' r` x+' -�� r�:,.�°"'"` ^ .�� tY. �� .;1 .,.•��i t .; �`• �ti': �•^•;�. �:c•....ti.y_''T; �''1. S �`-,� r ,�; :•� � .,:.r --- �.•��r.��• :`� LAKESIDE COURTS: Dir. 494 to Co. 9 East 1 V ., i ,• r T • •� ,� ;. s s.t ,,.,., i «. w e?^r. .�? r: , • -- ��;•�'' • s"1. ^- - "��,•:r .;v �. ,\ - �...• a r Lane, 1 mi. N. to Schmid >u�•• .,•�,�.. 1'•v.. + ' .rt J � • v. • .••��` ...�. t • �.► I '. a-►. • ti•. 'i i �• �"` ► ,r�'��.n r J• , .i - � • '.• '+ ♦ 1: �, i y • Lake Rd., left 5 blocks to Forest View Lane I Zach Stull Photo by Donald and Iell 4 h1r)cks to t akeside Court model, Black Mary Anderson Homes To save oak troos around this house In Bloomington, the developer made sure that old root systems wore not suffocated by new fill dirt. 0901 Lyndale Ave. S., Bloomington, Pho "Preserving trees becomes a very Trucks and other equipment Trees Continued from page 15 expensive proposition." Graham shouldn't be parked under trees said. "To save the trees. you're using because exhaust and hot g, ses can ' said Don Wllleke, a lawyer and Inches of soil over a tree's root more land, and then If you have to harm the trees, and the equipment The IS chairman of the state Shade Tree system, which spreads beyond the fence the trees, you're getting to a can compact the ground. Wounds or g fmss Advisory Committee. leaf line, usually will cause most point where people (With moderate scratches In oaks should be�1 mature trees to die within two years. Incomes) can't afford the houses on Immediately treated with a sealing, "I would say It's a very major Contractors often spread dirt to level them." compound. problem," he said. "I think It's done a sloped lot, but the compacted soil I' .��; ,;�. ; Cut all the time around the area, and I'd can cut off the oxygen supply to the Graham said his firm puts snow French and Shirley suggest calling In say we're losing millions of dollars tree's fine hair roots. Because trees fences around trees to protect them landscape architects or tree' �.. K worth of trees." can store a lot of energy, It can take from harm and to keep vehicles specialists to help determine which two to three years for them to die. from driving across the roots. If the trees are valuable and worth saving.\ \ �. I in the area have Armed with testimony from ground has to be graded near a Most communities a p rominent treespecialists and ■ Cutting roots for a foundation or mature tree his comp any builds a city foresters who can recommend P. nursery and forestry experts, the for sewer or utility lines may kill the well around the base of the tree to appropriate consultants, Shirley said. I Webers sued the land developer, part of the tree fed by those roots. If allow the roots to get the air they 1 advice Their case was resolved out of court the roots are heavily disrupted, the need. "People get profccs o na 1 a du c •. Ir . - ,,., and they received a cash settlement whole tree may die. I don't when they're g plans "' Wh th' making for their a , �o;�� • � , of about $20,000. recommend building a house very Some trees do have to come down homes for any number of things," • close to a tree, because without the because they are In the middle of a French said. "It costs a lot of money That paid for removing the dead root system, some or all of the tree lot, "but we try to minimize loss," to take a tree down, and It only takes trees and planting a few will die," French said. "Sometimes Graham said. "Still. It gives me an a professional a few minutes to give And at Kenwood Isles Condominturr replacement ones -- two ash trees, a people have actually built their eerie feeling to have to cut down a advice about saving one." Seniors, our home owners rejoice in Norway maple, a clump birch and house around a tree, or a deck r 200- year -old tree." ' • I ' freedom. Finding time, now for shoj an American linden -- trees • Around a tree. That's a poor Nome buyers should ask the and Calhoun Square, tNalks around I described by the Webers' lawyer as Investment." whips" with diameters of 2 to problem of construction• Wllleke and French. by siring the consultants for references and check �' j, .. etlness classes at.thc ad scent �'�V( "buggy killed trees, ,) the references. Minnesota lacks 3 inches. But because of Maple ■ In the case of oaks. which often "are holding up a rightful flag,;' said ., some sort of monitoring or minlmum i A move to KcnNvood Isles is well de: Grove's heavy clay soil, three of the, are Considered the most desirable Glen Shirley. who hrts been standards for this trade,", French... ' ) , ou think, ,just ask alt }'one who Ilvea trees died. So they keep planting trees on wooded lots, any kind of cut Bloomington's city forester for 14 said, • I And lac <E NW( :tiles to now ones. or nick In a tree can Invite the ; ..1 years. "There should be more ., . visit Our six Insects that carry oak wilt disease, t awareness on the publlc's a ccount,.,, It all , else falls. there are legal Dead trees often are passed off by particularly in May and June, ,� remedies tffcr>rnt models builders or developers as French said. "Bark beetles can feed Shirley, who was hired just as Dutch , unavoidable, caused by oak wilt or on even the healthiest elm trees, elm disease was moving Into , . "Minnesota courts have been other disease, said John Daniels, causing Dutch elm disease," he said. Bloomington, has since seen trees In conscious of the difference between Willeke's law partner, who ... "But a healthy oak can't be damaged his city killed by what he calls "cut a shade tree and mere timber," represented the Webers In their by oak wilt unless there Is a wound and fill" land - development work for Daniels said. "There nre cases going lawsuit. But In many cases the In the tree --- even the smallest houses. But the good word back to the I P70s that recognize that deaths are preventable, experts say, wound or broken branch." apparently Is spreading, he said, and a tree on a residential or lately he's seeing more developers commercial lot is shade and has a "I think the way building practices A home site dotted with mature trees spending time and money to save value that Is different from a certain have been In Minnesota, a lot of • )• usually is more expensive than a trees. 'x' number of board feel" trees have been lost due to ' : cleared lot, but unless the trees are ' t construction that didn't have to be avoided and protected, "You may Before buying a Wooded lot, airy would anyone want 10 save a lost," said David French, head of the just be buying a lot of very green , potential buyers should talk to the tree anyway? • ' , Plant Pathology Department at the ` firewood," Wllleke said. "It's sad land developer as well as the builder University of Minnesota, who was because you cannot replace a 100- to determine which trees are going "Trees soften the landscape and ' among (hose called In to confirm the year -old or 200 - year -old tree. Il It to be saved and protected. French make it more attractive. They diagnosis on the Webers' trees. dies, you'll never see Its like again, said. If the base of a tree trunk on provide wind protection, stinding and unless you live a lot longer than I the lot is not enlarged, or if no cooling In summer. t=rench said. "There are a lot of builders who do hope to." buttress roots can be seen. suspect a "In the tall. they drop their lenves ; take care, and with knowledge and %' . land fill. and we have to rake them and soy r . care. this doesn't have to happen," Thomas Graham. of Graham they give us exercise." • French said. Development Co., Is one of several The trees that are to be saved should , local land developers who be fenced — "And I don't mean a1 i The deaths of otherwise healthy consclously work to preserve trees putting a little piece of wire around • . f :.r trees can be attributed to several on home sitei. said French, who has the stem of the tree. . French said. , construction - related causes: 'advised Graham on tree "You could still bang Into that with a ' preservation for several year's. bulldozer." ■ Putting more than three or four ' T'- 3 Action b Council MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modif ied ,TO Cit Mana Rejected FROM: Director of Communit Development Date SUBJECT: Moratorium DATE: Au 22, 1989 INTRODUCTION The Cit Council, on Au 17, asked staff to respond to a .proposal for a moratorium on new plats. The purpose would be to s,tud whether the minimum lot size should be increased to save more trees, BACKGROUND The Cit considered a similar proposal to this in 1982. (Refer to the attached newspaper article on pa 3 and the t response from developers in the letter from Marlin Grant on pa 4. Subse an environmental protection ordinance was proposed b staff that would have allowed • the Cit to reduce densities to one dwellin for each acre of land. After lobb b develope rs, this provision was chan to g uarantee developers the maximum densi m, t allowed in the land use plan, DISCUSSION In some cases, increasin the minimum lot size ma help to save trees. In other cases, the g radin g re to develop a site ma have to be done re of the lot size. Streets and utilities still need to be installed and the site ma still need extensive '' for draina purposes or to g et the proper elevation for '4 sanitar sewer draina A. si increase in lot sizes would also unnecessaril raise housin costs for lots where there are no si natural features. The environmental protection ordinance is the best wa to save ,si natural features. The problem with the current ordinance is that the densit g uarantee se s ev e*re l 'restricts the Cit abilit to preserve trees I and other natural features. The proposed revision to this ordinance would allow the Cit to reduce densities b 20% to save si natural features. This means that the Cit could increase the minimum lot size to 12,000 s feet if needed to save si natural features This seems like a minimal densit reduction and the Council ma to allow more flexibilit to save si wish to increase i I natural features. The last concern with a moratorium is the le issues. Refer to the attached memo from the Cit Attorne on pa 6. J;%A;o NDATI4N Take no action on the moratorium. MEM08 Attachments 1. Newspaper article 2. Letter: Marlin Grant 3. Memo: City Attorney 2 - r VV ' d - - S G e f t Q 2 Section' . .. 0 lew oo d,, Minnesota WED., JUNE "16; 19 Single Copy 3 Ma < Y• • •• p - t Y✓ ` • .iirrw. -l and �. i •� yi •a _ - � ,Y lans 4. � • �r, •. _ :•4•�. . � . {' •ia "� .'�;,'•• mil. i'« af� ! a �. i _ •.y 3_ •- qZ - _SSA.. : Or d zi res rvation „ _ - ^[_:'fir' z - M`• - _ G . • }`•. � : i' Y• y � .+ AIM deecendir there lakes the chain ntal rotection with the least m vironme �.P w � JONATHON - CLYDE :GLASS . 1 effect on builders, according to a Phalen. 3' - financial en it -came to addressing the c - Staff Writer to evaluate = ti is -� Haider. It enables the city Wilt ' rob]t _` - ' r k y ; _ �� each development proposal on . an . ui - D ch Elm and Oak ,p _ took ho ever, the council cited Maple_ wood qty Council • dividual basis -and apply the en s several s at 'its June 19 meeting to nes a to —ideals—In—de #mating- h... *: .._ .. virownental guideliccord�n�lg y e.. I'S' , _ c. .j" preserve the city's unique environmental _ : r ' pia to finance Maplewood s dis • tY explained:. with M features abut_ xurned thumbs down on a din Mon the terrain, some. program. By 3-2, votes,, #i an to extend the diseased tree _ and Councilman Gary Bastian in _ r_ developments could have 10,000- square-; -.. - is while others could be required to in city, the council rjerted n . - �Y. -�-�• : - - -. � reanoval pro m._:_ •� � � -feet to ., r. % $� a 5 vote,: the council ordered city have 60 000- uare -feet minunums, added ' rec rx}endations to provide a tot,-, , , sq £: rs to -prepare an environmental an Ma Lee Maida, a strong 1104, in variuos farms of reside p�� councilwoman ry K. ass men to support : e progra- - � overlay ordinance designed to protect _ roponent of the environmental policy • ` r #lootiplains ' woodlands steep P �> 1982 a d 1983. wetlands # A , '•`�= ' exception to two statem , x w.3 slopes nd other specified natural 1Vlaida took exc ts P Hai r explained that the city's f rom improper development. in the staff report which recommended y r eased tree program has . .:� features to keep housing as . • .. , k< i ?, The ordinance may set important that the council try P highly uccessfui. From a peak of for the future development of affordable as possible and refrain from than 4, t.� c ut and. removed in - m' lot sizes just 10 r has steadil declined tt minimum J i since a major rtion of the land increasing 'the num Y J come_ neighborhoods. said dis la y t�' er in g 1 . he r ailiin n for construction ae create high than 500 in 198 , P �.�:. rem g � ti hv segment of the. -- � '. " r ial environmental characteristics. There is an important chart wi a steeply' dec inuig r ' ublic which can afford to ordinance should be ready for or council }souse- buying p once u drop the sanitation pry • rev by:eptember -or early fall. .pay higher home costs for the amenities .tthe euttin and removal of disea -" cton n �` the environmental of an open,.tvstic environment, she said. :.dead. trees)' that curve will jump uF ` lic originated , in ��i would hate to see Maplewood in a l • o ..the next yer, he said. development P y Feb when the council requested that reverse discrimination .type situation,'. One: of cider's recomrriend nuiarY ; •_ - -Stud the sibility -o she said. - t - the city 0 � -�.. assess in that a city survey of homeowners ` or ` 100 percent of `stablishing residential- estate zoning Maida also noted tyy// _ ,� - ' removal cos • on their property -• ° •_: t stricts 4tti.:�cii�nunum l sizes from -residents south of Lower Afton Road '' { . ,,.. bi e : _ t - - 20 000 :to "pip square . feet, for the hilly indicated support for arger other suggest than the council af_ land south 49 L i*er Af ton'Road. The lot size requu-ements there. Of 120 peop e ' a special lei on all homed t. '_ • ng X4. ' lannsng mm�esion and Haisuig and responding to the -ques, onnau�e, �r po - averagi household to . 'both recom- pressed approval of the residential-esta R_ ecevelopme.t� a Authority "; p PP the program dentlal g. Forty red :s i ; mended -that : -the 'Study . � resi zonin - vu est n Forty-two favo e „be expa - .0 `ever the square -feet minimums,. while 25 favored Mayor. John G ea qu io e t to zo 30 000 and 24 preferred 20 ,000: Despite the such a levy should only apply to el v �(# � .' •. rf � 1i01e 4� rt�.• .,�`��• � :'.�'�; � ;.�- - •'i ?► :. - Rt.... � � • .. .. ' ed #lie tnattI they public support #or residential- estate oak diseases. l Staff�+vievv 9'! As • 'e� =other �n 'Boris s` .besides Toning, Maids led the council in act ' why not {do it for 11 trees he ti id P ; resident al- estate zonusg 'Including 'the vocating the environmental overlay ,or- Councilxr an No Anderson w: _ Po • y t discrimina► inst .. a can' a ago, _ try ` iii • l.: nce and special dinance as a more workable tic tool. ta, rdma P� �,t ; _,. w - .. ti. said,o • ghat g rnment pry rnent regulations A -- H`- . planne knit �Develo ..� : � � • _ . . , .. . TO THE Ko L d - Y 'to. all . ]` +■ ijL��! p��•■ of bousin develop- . TURNING l a shoul a l �+i:. dens.lty - g '. , - - 4.` sensitive yeas. council unanimously approved E� 'Bastian tried to mak the levy P i nen t s m environmentally sensitive a area, be fa more sttra tl ending c ve b recd end' dential- estate zoning proposal Rams bounty s plans to 4. : Y .�. -"F .y • - �.A 1'A4." increases A • • en & {a •' .d 'b :es t -�. ` -,� f " `, _ .#he largest cost - a - ulslti easem r °• • ;" , �d - 7, �cTea rg c9 t 7C ' - 't:L .`nt=, +'�{� -�'- -v �l�°'. . -.i • • •t U,1. _ e liullders while failing to ' .12 land to P .. _ : or prpe"� - . ltie $ _ ' i ` �arttciailarly f - environmental features despite filtration Ys a _ meets the �Hi wa bl. P f or the installat a►�► F evy Pp? • 1knto Y _ - a dot size 8� .,� n ��n a ��!� �� # f, .... * r a�(��- :� : - . •�� : �r a ��•'�� - - -�/� •lan ��•_L prflg''a�► .. � 1IIt< S' •'. r 1r .. - .4.. .., ice/ = �,� � i' toneluded.,,�� -- < ��•� ._ �:� � � -�� :,�. - � c , ' . o - ,- - -, •y r o f d"s a other plantso to trees m the ity p ; _ ,, ?- panting o . • 7_ '' rt the silt nd chemicals � �`W need to do s th�. citl e for five ears : "= � YoU..7ANE the land to 90,000 absorb or di , n a on a new years, ` Y doesn't sa a to carried n dwater - Funding lie a ded, in argument w 'ch an �admin tration�► has square feet�that. Y nY bil e Reag about -how , many trees he for the ect, which will cov si acres, _ futil . _ , �tened to °veto the `,. -which it _ the developer ' D'uctor Ken and be completed this Wines _ W th the -2 votes, the 1VI must save,'u"bTic wo: , - ; federal s � : F- federal > Sov ehL was, e '` tree program in �ders unnecessary Raider #old the ... < Y entire #r°°m _ .» a r a hr 't - es rwuig water° vietun p'e'a PP o said. ewhat - environmental overlay o 8esid , it is ted to Perm.• ' nanc( nt� s district has changed sotn - festive en - I ohlman, P� '; - _ makes •possible the most of result of the - jecently approved S The - pl an fo w Y . , •trictin Muuiesota �� . , . _ - _ _ . � . - . awr * in* efill ineludes all a y _, r , - - _ _ V • 7 r°r" k '" s 4;,w i M .h. Anderson BETTER HOMES FOR BETTER LIVING MARVIN N. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY July 7, 198 2 111901 LVNOALE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 564E0 ;fir, John Greavu, Mayor Maplewood City Hall' .1380 Frost ,Avenue .Maplewood, r Minnesota 55109 Regarding; Land Preservation Ordinance Dear. Greavu: TELEPHONE 881 -2661 1977 , 25 From: city ?r. Refereed To: . Avlayo r council Cin` O : ^to r G trve r Date__ I read with interest the article in the June 16, 1982 Maplewood Review, entitled 'Council Plans Land Preservation Ordinance', I would like to re- emphasize to you the difficulty that home 0 buyers are experiencing in attempting to buy homes with interest rates .where they have been for the past 12 month period. 1 do not feel that we are going to see any sizable decrease in interest rates in the future and that current market rates are going to be something that we will have to live with from this point on. With this in mind, the ,difficulty in.-purchasing a home, I fear, will continue from this day forward. With that, I feel we all -- must do everything that we possibly can to help create a situation where new people can buy a home in every community including Maplewood and not be priced out of a given area. Unfortunately, any time that you begin to consider increasing mimimum lot sizes, it goes without , that saying, .Y g t the cost of the. lot will increase dramatically as will the house. Therefore, I would heartily urge you to consider this subject closely and to not create a situation which is going to inc the requirement of lot sizes therefore increas ing the cost of housing. We have not personally found a segment of the market which can or will . afford to pay higher home costs for the amenities of open rustic environment. Obviously, there is an exception to every rule and there certainly are some very well to do people Who perhaps can afford this. However, I would hope that. we are more concerned about that average person rather than that person who can afford whatever they want, 4 Attachment 2 Pag e 2 July 7, 1982 Whenever a survey: is made for reside th ' x housing, residents who already have . eI sing , the results always come out that t a lots they would prefer large and within larger er houses placed ed u on the and .Land around them or wi p eveloped In their community* Such residents r` look at possible increased ro ert values - p p y lues for their subject property which in many cases are not large to the g lots. However unfortunately Y do not concern themselves with other struggling homebuyers attempting to buy P g Y housing at costs nor do they take the time to. remember the . u struggle tha t they may have had to purchase a the home they presently live i Y n. Many times such existing - Property owners do not realize the difference In monthly housing expense- from the time h t at the Y may have purchased their home. As an purchased a ver y nice custom home 10 example : they may have ears ago a • per m Y g at a monthly cost of $200 to $300 p month. Wherein now the same exact home c easily cost $1,000 to $1,200 ermonth. I an person ahead - p In situation the p y living in a home versus the erso - . p n attempting to buy a home many times has the same income, however, as this example shows, it is then very ifficult if - the person who Y not Impossible for p o did not buy that same home 10 year a • :for it today. Y go to qualify. 1 would hope that we, as the residential - Identlal Industry, you, as public officials, and existing Maplewood ew g p ood res ldents would all share concern as to how people today can purchase new hom within our communities. es I heartily ask your sincere - consideration of this Item. I will greatly appreciate the opportunity o speak ' Y p k with you regarding this Item at the appropriate time. Sincerely, MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 0,000 Marlin D. Grant President JOG: mg - . 5 MEMO To: Geoff Olson, City Planner Michael McGuire, City Manager . � er g From. Patrick J. Kelly, Ys Co-City A ttorney Date. August 21, 1989 Re Moratoriums Minnesota Statute §462.355, Subd. 4 allows and authoriz • . s es interim ordinances. If a city i conducting studies, has authorized a stud y comprehensive y, or is in the process of adopting or amending . prehensive plan, the c� council may a g g a city y dopt an interim ordinance a li of its ;jurisdiction, pp cable to all or part fihe interim ordinance may regulate, Y gu , restrict, or prohibit any use, develop ' ' • for a period not to exceed one year from P , or .subdivision y om the date it takes effect. The cit ma additional periods as the council tY y extend it for • may deem appropriate, not exceeding t ' period of 1$ months. No Interim g total additional ordinance may halt, delay, or imp ede a • ' na a Y p subdivision which has had preliminary • nter ry pp . al prior to the effective date of the int ' ,, be noted that iim ordinances erim ordinance. It should nances are not subject to the procedural or extraordin requirements applicable to other zoning ary vote . g ordinances. Cities may find . it desirable Burin h • g the preparation of a zoning ordinance to ado • or .stop gap ordinance to reserve the pt an interim • ve zoning ordinance. Be p status quo of the city pending the adoption comprehensive g Pon of the Because zoning studies are time consuming, interim m ordinance can maintain some land use planning while the city s in the roce the ordina nice. ty p ss of adopting To support the validit f an interim 1 • ty and use control ordinance • follovwn suggestions when , a city should consider the g en drafting the ordinance: 1) The closer the roce -Bur � . p e complies with requirements for a a erm P Went zoning ordinance, the more likely a court will validate an interim ordinance. ' should use This means the cit a available land use information • commission. `follow n ,use the planning otice and hearing procedures, and adopt the ' 2/3 of all council memb ordinance by hers. :2) In a preamble or elsewhere , the ordinance should set out the cir cumstances requiring the interim procedure and p show that it is part of a continuin l effort that will result as soon as possible g planning p s ble in the permanent ordinance. 3) The more rovi . P sions of the permanent ordinance that the interim ordinance includes, the more likely the courts will sustain it. This ordinance . establish means that the should esta b sh at least a minimum number • provide the of use districts and p regulations that are applied to each. 6 Attachment 3 MEMO Page Two August 21, 1989 Courts have held a valid moratorium based on the following: 1) Enacted good faith without discrimination; 2) Limited. duration; 3) Study proceeds properly; 4) Ordinance expeditiously adopted. The courts will balance and weigh consideration as to whether or not the landowner has substantially changed his position in reliance on the existing ordinance and to whether or not the municipality has acted in good faith or has discriminated against a particular property owner, CONCLUSION Again, the courts will look at the following: 1) The closer the procedure complies with requirements for a permanent zoning ordinance, the more likely a court will validate an interim ordinance. 2) To proceed correctly the city should use available land use information, use the planning commission, follow notice and hearing procedures, adopt the ordinance gP P by 2/3 vote of all council members. SUGGESTION Questions of Planning: 1) Does estate zoning accomplish the preservation of trees? 2) Is the enforcement of tree preservation feasible? 3) Is the preservation of trees a problem in other areas and zones in the city? 4) Will an environmental ordinance be easier to enforce and regulate tree preservation throughout the city? 7 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: City Manager Modifi FROM: Public Works Director - � -- �t ' SUBJECT: Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87-32--Schedul e Public Hearing DATE: August 22, 1989 The hearing for Footprint Lake storm sewer was scheduled for September 14, 1989, at the last city council meeting. This was predicated on a September 17 trial date concerning the project. After discussion with the city manager and city attorney, it is felt that the hearing can be postponed until after the trial date. Since this is a large hearing, additional time to prepare would be beneficial for the engineering division. Since a number of other hearings for Ramsey County projects will be held in September and October, it is suggested that this hearing be scheduled in November or December. KGH jw 7 ~ �- AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: City Manage Eodors r eu-�~�~�-�~� Modified_.._____� FROM: Assistant City Engineer Reject ' Dat SUBJECT: County Road C--Trunk Highway 61 to Hazelwood Street, ---- Project 89-04--Schedule Public Hearing DATE: August 22, 1989 Introduction Ramsey County has had a consultant engineer prepare a feasibility report evaluating the recommended improvements and costs of the subject improvement. This report presents the city's financing of its costs based upon the estimates contained in the draft feasibility report. The final feasibility report will be transmitted separately. ` The recommended width of the reconstructed County Road C roadway is 40 feet measured from the face of concrete curb and gutter across to the opposite face. This is proposed to be with no ' parking allowed on either side based upon standardized Ramsey County design and practice. It is possible that the roadway . could have parking on one side or a reduced width which would conform to State Aid standards. The Highway 61 frontage road would be relocated to the east at a width of 36 feet. Other aspects of the proposed project are a new bridge across the DNR trail (Burlington Northern tracks). The new bridge would be s1gnificantly lower than the existing bridge. This would improve deficient existing sight distance. A sidewalk on one side is propose|. A storm sewer with outlet to Kohl man Lake is included in the proposal. The storm sewer would be routed through a proposed pond to enhance water quality prior to discharge to Kohlman Lake. The city share of roadway costs is estimated to be approximately $126,200 for excess roadway width over 24 feet and sidewalk. This includes 18 percent engineering and administration payable to Ramsey County and 7 percent for city engineering and administration. The estimated total cost to be paid by the city for storm sewer, together with curb and gutter, is similarly estimated to be $147 ^ Maplewood Project 89-04 -2- August 22, 1989 A review has been made of the amount recoverable from assessments ' under the standardized rates of $500 per RL or RM lot for storm sewer, $0.10 per square foot on all other uses for storm sewer, and $1125 for unit street costs~ The amounts recoverable are $90,000 and $53,625 for street and storm sewer costs, respectively. The excess cost above assessment recovery is proposed to be through an off-system expenditure of Municipal State Aid funds. General Obligation funding is also proposed to supplement the MSA off-system transfer for storm sewer expenses. If the sidewalk is deleted or if the street width is reduced, then the assessments do not change. The costs to be covered by a proposed MSA off-system transfer would be reduced. Recommendation It is recommended that a public hearing be scheduled for this project. jw Attachment LQ W.0 spy D/P NO. MWITY DECK LIST COL. 1) = STREET - UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SEWER - UNIT COL.-3)-=--sTORM-SEW1ER-.-=. S.F.- COL. 4) = SEWER SERVICE COL. 5) = WATER SERVICE f gw� A v. 0011-22-1989 PIN NO. COL I COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 �' 1.00 0.00 0.00 ____ 00 0.00 03-29-22-33-0044 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03-29-22-33-0045 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 - ------ ------ COL. 5) = WATER SERVICE &-29-22-,-53q048 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3- 29 -22-a " . 3 -0043_ -140 1., 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03-29-22-33-0050 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 03-29-22-33-0051 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10-29-22-22-0019 1.00 1.00 03-29-22-33-0054 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03-29-22-33-0055 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -03.- 2� 74733700&0 2.0(x 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 10-29-22-22-0002 1.00 1.00 0.00 03-29-202-34-0010 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03-29-22-34-0013 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.3-29-22-34-0014 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 10:3-29-22-34-0015 4.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 ---037297-22-34-0022 ----.-- 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-0022 1.00 0.00 32234.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-0023 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-0025 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-N26 1.06 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --04-29-22-43-0027 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-0028 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-0029 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-0031 1.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 04-29-22-43-002 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09 0.00 - ------- - - 0.00 0.010 09-6-22-11-0010 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09-29-22-11-0012 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09-29-22-11-0013 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----- - 0.00 09-29-22-11-0018 1.00 0.00 17386.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09-209-22-11-0035 2.00 2.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--- 09-29-"00-11 -@vie 2.00 0.00 24134.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09-29-22-11-0063 1.00 0.00 12000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0'00 0.00 10-29-22-21-0002 15.00 15.00 0.00 14.00 4.00 0.00 10-29-22-601-0006 0.00 0.00 54886.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10-29-22-22-0002 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10-29-22-22-0003 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 PROJECT NO. 89-04 CO RD C-TH61 TO HZLWD ST D/P NO. QUANTITY CHECK LIST PAGE 2 OF 2 08-22-1989 �' COL. 2) - STORM SEWER -UNIT COL. 3) = STORM SEWER - S. F. =.-SEWER,,.SERVICE-----.-- - ------ ------ COL. 5) = WATER SERVICE COL. 6) = PIN NO. COL I COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 1.0729-22-22-0017 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10-29-22-22-0019 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10-29-22-22-0020 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 a i1oz- --- 29:7227-22.70021 __400- 0.00 10-29-22-22-0002 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 4 0.00 0.00 41 171 GRANn TOTALS 80. eta 74.00 166246,00 21000 aloe oleo N W 60 a O Q 22 Q� V � Gervais Lgk .: , a co D 23 N J PAL C PALM Y CR :-BONN R G ON I ZA CiR :'CT _ TRADO DR LCREST DR ,UVILLE DR 22 W E HDIAN DR a 0 << II" RD too" Q 2S BURKE AV ELDRIOOE AN c ULMO SKILLM"M i .. KFNW GENERAL ASSESSMENT AREA ASSESSMENT AREA MAP PROJECT 89 -04 COUNTY ROAD C TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST i i S DEMONT AV cn 4 T AV a GE 2 W Y k/e Head L aj 4„RECR HARRvc SCALE N N/A MAkKH M POND Cpl Q - Q 10 29 -22 -21 ASSESSMENT AREA MAP PROJECT 89 -04 COUNTY ROAD C � TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST SCALE Vt :: 40OF N S . �j 4 C; 17 M M rn � •c� .'75' 31 '1 O 4 1 .,2,3ac: 23ac. •3? Sc. .5/ i Ipq � - ?g 5'�'sc. `. �1e • 15 �18� .So7,ac. � - pp• .. 5osatc. •8 ?ate. .. O - 39 61 '1 F o ( _ P-90 �, ,, 3 Z 3 h •0 •�. '� ' � - - �� 2 040 30 3/d 3 q �.. °° � X3 6 x .42 ac.' • 2� a 2c ul? �2Co� •25 ac. - 23? 3 r - 22t .s Ga mac. ' 273 . 124 130 _ 353' ( -309 ► _ ,p r` 37 SZ A .58 ac. (- 30� - Sao h C33 �., c- � t` - 'T • 96 ac. c . r0 --70 -5 ) T =». 58d �� - •3$ .tC. ♦40 S 2 a_ c. 37 Li E. TP. 94ac. •a4 0 .37 ac. � "'� p,rt.`, d 3� C Zg� X35) co . h cl- 44 -7) .93 ac . 1 (9) w o 090 3e6 1 .84ac• 4 Z 33' B7AC. (.Sal). ( } m �3 (5E4) ` 10 �- 1 �•)� R E `nL 0 1. ac. (ate n.. .83 o�c • GOO "�tt} . 69a" ly) 4 ` -771 00 1.2-1 M ( - 7m?.$) •91 c. t80• 1.8s ac. 3 45 - �13 .. r• (40) co •9 z a c. �o 93 8 t; 101 '1 3b 0RAIt41. S a r, t4� o .92 a. c. 15� 1 Doe.. -- * 233bt4e 6 1 �, ('6J ► ' i t Z ! ass mt4. (rG� . •`` (4Z) �� a ac. 1 -- .39 - ► 160• ' '35 ac . b -t 9 Qwm�Q O�29�22=�22 ASSESSMENT AREA MAP SCALE PROJECT 89 -04 COUNTY ROAD C 1' = TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST 400' ' ! (t !pl i 1 r`4 N ■ QO I I 1 six 1 7 I 70 'I' 9 ri .32x� 37 I I t S , �� U) 3� 34 35 ) oo I I 36 37 3 �4} 1 39 dip t �}� 42 tv 43 44 4 �' , O 21 L ( 57 ) Z 3.4 e I i I t 251 341 (7 (4j) 9!' � (53) W di 6,31 30 ,..29 28 27 26 25 2q 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 01 - 7, + II � O , 9 1va ' l[1 (6 1 1 I l In CD 8� 54 �q C8; 9 1 0 259 4 42.40 3 127 I r_ d- �� . 'u V N S , �� wAo 14 ? O+ 1 4040--- •�• 1 Q - Q 3 29 -22 -33 of m N ASSESSMENT AREA MAP PROJECT 89 -04 COUNTY ROAD C TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST SCALE 400' Q �J 1 2. a c. / 7 1 71 (2z 259. D S O •4 .40 Q- 3� !off 27 • X07 '�, eM 32� Q - Q 3 ASSESSMENT AREA MAP PROJECT 89 -04 COUNTY ROAD C TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST SCALE if/ = 400' M M cc O co m �o 33 N X /13 It - - , , -.- - 0 . I I I , I I 0 M , id I (7) N1 sz. Ir N J � .'_53 �zc � � � i I � O10 � - .� oLo �� I I � 77 QV =" � � � ! O . w o � 1 I VV %D 17 1 G 15 14 1 13 I i2 N _ �� 2.71x, ac . " � �,�� ,;�' 47 44., (3) 6 1 ( 2- • �� ,.�► (40) Dcc r 6o) N B. 94-ac /. P1 ILA 9 �. ►► � ` L C' 9,a (0 V o � I ice. .' .�h , ,' . �� - � i ?3.4 CD - —KO-HLMAN --AV _T 747 -1 0 c 0 'IF .30 Xc Z - 7 ) cli CF :8 80 (3 (1 2-) 0 9 4 + ,a� 6i, � J .30 IV 4!31 4 . 2 1-9 1831 1 Af 430 1 5 0 d rm I (n (43) .74ac.. So x en 1) . s: 4 oc c 1 3 '.. 4 V) 2 0 76 f L4 V NO + 1 40 E) a 0 up CO 10ji .11 1411 C 4.). 100 - 15 54* - 9 133L3,11 + 1 103. f& 1 3 Q —Q 4--29-22-44 ASSESSMENT AREA MAP SCALE (SCALE: PROJECT 89-04 COUNTY ROAD C 1 " _ 400' OW TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST 10 F r� t Z5 MAI-LtVitwdl -7 '75 oltio AcIce -75 1 �D .. i �$ � � t 0 0 ( �� ry (0-171) of 6 A-W rr o o12- o g I k 3 4(/ 0 'n S. 11 0 co --q- ( 180) .4-ac. ac, %-.. Z I 34 Q (0 134.5 <) Ila gg cil X dew% V) A 3 0) cl 4Z sa \0 t xOR it 3 o. S ooh— ' 20A 6. ot 2, XX L- il-;� z 0 Ivni < 0 –Z47) 14-1 'q�� (1 (76)- fv ( T) 1 0 Co. 1 � e co; (49) i 1� 3 ( n k Q (D (5 34 �} / 4-) j i Ln 1160 a pa. #2,1 I at \0 ::133 7"n 3 00 u " N (5) 60 1% 4- 3 (77) 3 Z, v 14-( 0 61 e . 1 6 4.9 - - - 74 .9 %q 13 .7 a 4 A .19 vi cc 0 Q NT \ V iq Ld k 0 's Fo Igo > 7) V 117 0 C POND I N 9 �7 1 �q 6) 9.2 106 1!� / fi ll 7r.3 1!0 iseo 63 7SO 17 �� 18, � C 9� 7;r. 35. th ( (') `7� i t- av 1.47az- S 0 7 > 0 = I P E N LA c F4 ED � 'T Z-4 - Qc D o's - 228865 (74) N em R "> too m 14 13s -AVE- -Q 9 oac.z 90 !l --85 v u A m , DRAINAGE • '71.44' ra AREA 3RDs, D p• s / a PO I NG 333 A3' 5 L9 Q OUTLOT A AREA D O. C. A/o. WET LAND WS, 723065 • -33 n 76-F—i i 539, 357 ► 175s 7 A. <�� <) /37) 14 ,, rq,-rA L- 8. 0 9 Q—Q 9- 29--22--11 ASSESSMENT AREA MAP PROJECT 89-04 COUNTY ROAD C TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST SCALE I ft :: 400f RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING b WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood h een authorized and directed to prepare a report with refer �� to the improvement of County Road C 61 t H ence o City Project 89-04 by construction of street with Hazelwood and gutter new bridge, storm sewer ' sidewalk and concrete curb and appurtenances, WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein desc NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on County Road c- 61 to Hazelwood by construction of street with concrete curb and gutter, new bridge, storm sewer, sidewalk and feasible and shOuld best be mad appurtenances is ' e as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will consider th e aforesaid accordance with the reports and the resaid improvement in e a� property for all or a portion f the of benefited o according to MSA Chapter 429, a t an cost of the improvement impro«ement of $1,1231000, n estimated total cost of the 3. A public hearing will be held in the council h b Of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Mond ch�mers day of September, 19 89, at 7:15 p.m to consider ay' � e 25th ^ improvement. The city clerk shal ^ i ons er said notice of said hearing and i / g ve mailed and pub1ished mprovement as required by law. 7r �� AGENDA ITEM Action by Council., AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager Assistant City Engineer Endors Re Date- SUBJECT: Larpenteur Avenue, Interstate 35-E to Edgerton, Project 86 Public" Hearing DATE: August 22 1989 Introduction Ramsey County has prepared a project development report, which is appended hereto, for the reconstruction of La p Avenue from Interstate 35-E to Edgerton. Detailed roadway, bridge, and right-of-way plans have been prepared. These are presented to the council with a request to schedule a public hearing~ BackgrOUnd The major features of the proposed improvement are shown in the attached copy of the typical cross section giv in the plans. Four 12-foot wide lanes with concrete curb and gutter would be constructed. The plans show a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk on the north side of the street only. A storm sewer system is proposed that will discharge to a proposed pond within St~ Paul near the Wheelock Parkway crossing of the Burlington Northern tracks (DNR trail). A new four-lane bridge is to be provided to replace the existing two-land bridge just east of DeSoto over the DNR trail. Attached is a copy of the draft cooperative agreement prepared by Ramsey County. A final cooperative agreement will be presented, along with concurrence of award of bid~ The estimated amounts payable to Ramsey County for storm sewer and related ponding easement acquisition costs is $128,385.06. The estimated amount payable to Ramsey County for roadway-related items (curb and gutter and sidewalk) is $40,775.64. When the costs of engineering and administrative work done by the city is factored in the total project, costs become $136,000 and $43,200 for storm sewer and roadway, respectively. A review of the amount of the required financing recoverable from assessments has been made. The attached table gives the appropriate assessment units by P.I.N. The amounts recoverable are based upon $500 per RL or!RM lot and $0.10 per square foot for all other property for storm sewer with $1125 per unit for RL Maplewood Project 86-27 -2- August 22, 1989 and RM and $15 per front foot for all other uses for street. The ' total recoverable costs are $59,219 and $22,875 for storm sewer and street, respectively. The balance of costs of $97,100 is proposed to be paid under an off-system transfer of the city's Municipal State Aid account ` funds under Number 138-020-07. If the sidewalk were to be deleted from the project, the proposed assessments would not change. In this case, the amount of MSA off-system transfer would decrease to $74 Recommendation It is recommended that a public hearing be scheduled f or this project. BAI Jw Attachments I State of Minnesota Department of Transportation and County of Ramsey Department of Public Works Project Development Report and Location/Design Study Report for Larpenteur Avenue (CSAH 30) from I -35E to Edgerton Street in Maplewood and Saint Paul Proposed Improvement - Replace Bridge 7231 over abandoned Soo Line Railroad tracks near Desoto Street with an arch structure; reconstruct Larpenteur Avenue between 1 -35E and Edgerton Street State Project: S.P. 62- 630 -21 Minnesota Project: BRM -M 5103 (1 Recommended: etoo!: ounty Engineer Reviewed and Recommended: District Aid Engineer / 2 � Date Approved: �11/� lvG� �1>ate✓ /�'7i �i�,/ ,�•-ZQ • $ 7 Director, Office of State Ai Date M /2 -/L - 8L Date TABLE OF CONTENTS pale Project Development Report Introduction 1 j Project Location and Description 1 Objectives of Proposal 2 Public and Agency Involvement 4 Environmental Study 5 Determination Statement 7 Project Path Selection 7 Project Manager 8 Location Study Report Location of Proposed Improvement 9 Location Alternatives 9 "Do Nothing" Alternative 9 Future Improvements 9 Design Study Report Design Standards 9 Design Elements 9 Bridge 10 Railroad Crossings 10 Traffic Volumes 10 Traffic Signals 10 Lighting 10 -Design Speed . 10 Alternate Construction Options - Road 10 Alternate Construction Options - Bridge 11 Approximate Costs 12 Detours and Disruptions . 12 Right of Way 13 Project Manager 13 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Project Location Map 14 2 Typical Section - Existing Road and Bridge 15 3 Recommended Alternative - Arch Structure - Elevation and Plan 16 4 Proposed Road Typical Section 17 APPENDIX 18 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REPORT INTRODUCTION This Project Development Report and Location /Design Study Report for Larpenteur Avenue from I -35E to Edgerton Street has been prepared in accordance with the State of Minnesota Action Plan guidelines by Ramsey County Public Works De y ty ar P The proposed project, 0.6 miles in length, will reconstruct Larpenteur Avenue and replace the bridge over the former Soo Line tracks with an arch structure. Sidewalks will be constructed for the entire project length. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Location The proposed action is located along Larpenteur Avenue (CSAH 30) from I -35E to Edgerton Street. Larpenteur Avenue is the border between Saint Paul and Maplewood. The length of the project is 0.6 miles. Its location is illustrated in Figure 1, Project Location Map, P Description of Existing Facility Larpenteur Avenue has a functional classification - of minor arterial and is a federal aid urban route. It connects subregions and activity centers within subr ions. Medium - to -short trips at moder t - - � • p a e to lower speeds are the characteristics of minor arterials. The speed limit on this • portion of Larpenteur Avenue is 35 miles per hour. Traffic signals are located at Its intersections with I -35E and at Edgerton Street. Other intersecting streets stop for Larpenteur Avenue traffic. The 1986 average daily traffic (ADT) count on Larpenteur Avenue from I -35E to Desoto Street was 7200. The projected ADT for year 2000 is 9900. East of the bridge at Desoto Street to Edgerton Street 1986 ADT was 7000. The projected ADT for year 2000 is 9900. Traffic counts were conducted by Ramsey County Public Works Department and traffic projections were made by Ramsey County Public Works Department. Right --of -way width varies from 79.5 to over 100 feet. The existin g road is 44 feet wide (see Figure 2, Typical Section) except at the bridge east of Desoto Street where it is 30 feet wide. The road is operated as four lanes, undivided, e narrowing to two lanes at the bridge. Parkin is � • .g. Parking allowed on the road west of the bridge or on the bridge; however, it is not prohibited east of the bridge. The surface of the road is bituminous. It was last surfaced in 1961. Bituminous curbs have been constructed alon g the road. The bridge east of Desoto Street (No., 7231) carries traffic on Larpenteur Avenue over the former location of the Soo Line Railroad tracks. These tracks were abandoned b the railroad and the rails have been removed. The Minnesota sata Department of Natural Resources will use the former Soo Line right of way as a nonmotorized trail. The bridge was constructed in 1959. It is a steel beam span with a deck width (out -to- out) of 38 feet and total length of 158 feet. A minimal sidewalk rovision P is made on the south side. The vertical clearance was 23 feet above the railroad rails. I Description of Proposed Facility The bridge on Larpenteur Avenue east of Desoto Street will be removed and replaced with an arch structure to provide grade separation between the nonmotorized trail under Larpenteur Avenue and the vehicular traffic on Larpenteur Avenue. See Figure 3, Arch Structure Elevation and Plan. The grade of the road at the bridge location will be lowered to improve sight distances. - Desoto Street will be realigned to intersect Larpenteur Avenue slightly east of its existing location. Larpenteur Avenue will be reconstructed between the east I -35E ramps and Edgerton Street with four through lanes to meet state aid standards. See Figure 4, Proposed Road Typical Section. - A sidewalk is proposed on at least one side of Larpenteur Avenue for the entire project length. The arch structure will be sufficiently long to accommodate two sidewalks. Because of the expressed interest of the cities in sidewalks along Larpenteur Avenue, a bicycle path is not proposed as part of this project. Additional right of way would be 'needed to construct bicycle paths on Larpenteur Avenue. Adjacent Area Land use adjacent to Larpenteur Avenue is primarily residential, both single - family and multiple - family units. Driveways of residences along Larpenteur Avenue have direct access to the road. The former Soo Line right of way beneath Larpenteur Avenue was purchased by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. This right of way will be used for a nonmotorized vehicle trail as indicated in the Gateway Segment Master Plan of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Discussion has occurred about the designation of the proposed trail right of way as 4(f) at crossings with roads. The Federal. Highway Administration has determined that Section 4(f) would not -apply to the use of trail right of way for transportation purposes. OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSAL Existing Deficiencies The areas of deficiency on the project are the road, the bridge, the bridge approaches and the intersection of Larpenteur Avenue and Desoto Street. Larpenteur Avenue between I -35E and Edgerton Street has higher than average maintenance costs. The pavement is in poor condition and requires frequent patching. The absence of adequate drainage provisions contributes to the deterioration of the pavement surface. The existing bituminous curbs are less stable than concrete curbs; they are damaged by snowplows and traffic. The width of the road is 44 feet except at the bridge. The width does not meet standards for county state aid highways. With the volume of traffic on Larpenteur Avenue, the road should consist of four 12 -foot wide travel lanes, rather than 11 -foot wide lanes. The bridge on Larpenteur Avenue is deficient in width. The 30 -foot width allows only two lanes of traffic. The two -lane road width on the bridge, with four lanes approaching the bridge from both east and west, creates a bottleneck condition. The amount of traffic exceeds the capacity of two lanes, yet the bridge width cannot accommodate more lanes. The constraint of the bridge requires drivers to maneuver into a single lane and resents a less safe condition than g P would continuing two through Lanes in each direction. K4 4 i The concrete bridge deck is deteriorating. The top of the deck has been overlaid with bituminous and patched. Steel reinforcing bars are exposed on the underside of the deck due to concrete deterioration. Transverse cracks show efflorescence. These. conditions weaken the structural capacity of the bridge. The federal standards for evaluating bridges are based on a sufficiency rating. A sufficiency rating of 100 indicates a bridge ' of new condition with a safe load capacity P Y compatible with legal vehicle weights. A rating of 50 or less indicates that replacement considerations should be made. Factors considered in the sufficiency rating are structural adequacy, safety, serviceability, functional obsolescence and essentiality for public use. The sufficiency rating of the bridge on Larpenteur Avenue over the Soo Line right of way is 38.4. The approaches to the bridge are cracked and have settled. Vehicles driving over the bridge consequently experience a bump at either end of the bridge. Desoto Street enters Larpenteur Avenue from the north, five feet west of the e. brid The intersection angle of Desoto g g Street with Larpenteur Avenue is skewed. Turning movements at a skewed intersection are difficult for drivers to negotiate and require greater distance for drivers entering the intersection than do 90 degree angle intersections. Drivers of vehicles desiring to turn onto Larpenteur Avenue from Desoto Street have sight lines restricted further by the crest of the bridge deck and . by the bridge railings which obstruct their view of westbound traffic. The grade of the bridge g was determined by the vertical clearance necessary to accommodate rail traffic under the bridge. The restricted sight distance from Desoto Street to Larpenteur Avenue has, according to accident reports received by Ramsey County Public Works Department contributed to accidents at this location. Shifting the alignment of Desoto Street to the east is prevented by the bridge. Shifting it to the west would be costly because of existing development located there and would impact several adjacent ro erties, P P Cost Estimate The work proposed is estimated to cost $902,400. The costs are divided as follows: Federal State Federal County Bridge Transpor- Aid State Aid Maple- St. Total Re 1. tation Urban Highway wood Paul Bridge Removal $ 25,000 $ 25 000 Construct Arch 181 144 $36,200 Construct Roadway 562,000 $358,000 196 $ 4 000 4 000 Storm Sewer 88 62 8,800 8 800 8 800 Sidewalk (two sides) 46 000 - - } 23 _ 23,000 Total $902,400 $144,800 $36,200 $420,000 $ $35 $35 This estimate is based on federal bri a replacement � P funds federal , ral i a d urban funds, state transportation funds and Ramsey County policy for cost participation. 3 } Users Who Would Benefit from the Proposed Action Those who drive or ride vehicles along this portion of Larpenteur Avenue would benefit from the proposed project. The current average daily traffic count is 7000 to 7200. Traffic is anticipated to increase, and therefore even more vehicular users would be benefitted in the future. Pedestrians will benefit if a sidewalk is constructed along Larpenteur Avenue. t Obiectives of PrODOSaI Reconstruction of Larpenteur Avenue will provide a safer, smoother roadway. The removal of the bridge and its replacement with an arch will also enhance safety at this location by providing a surface sufficiently wide for vehicles to travel on safely. The grade separation will eliminate potential vehicle conflicts with bicycle and pedestrian trail traffic under Larpenteur Avenue, PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT Public Meetings A meeting has been held with Saint Paul District 3 Community Council on the project. Maplewood may schedule a public hearing on the project. In accordance with Ramsey County policy, at least one public hearing will be held. Governmental Involvement The following agencies have been or will be contacted about this project: Board of Ramsey County Commissioners City of Saint Paul Saint Paul Water Utility City of Maplewood Minnesota Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Minnesota Historical Society Regional Transit Board Metropolitan Council Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Correspondence and summaries of meetings held with some of these agencies are contained in the appendix of this report. Permits Required No permits will be required for this project. Negotiations will occur with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources about right of way required. Prioritization The Board of Ramsey County Commissioners has approved a capital improvement program and deficient bridge program which include this proposed project. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 4(f) Involvement r � r There will be no use of any 4(f) land for this project. Section 404 and Wetlands Findin This project will not involve filling in any waterway, lake or wetlands. No 404 er ' p mlt from the Army Corps of Engineers will be required. Executive Order 11990 re ardin protection of wetlands will not apply and no wetlands finding will b g e necessary. g Coast Guard Permit Requirements This project is exempt from Coast Guard permit requirements. Right of Way Right of way needed to construct an arch structure would be 0.3 acres. This ri ht g of way would be acquired from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. No additional permanent right of way is anticipated to be needed for h Pa other proposed work on Larpenteur Avenue, Air Quality The air quality of the proposed improvement has been ro analyzed. The Y pro posed improvement is not anticipated to have significant air quality impacts and is considered to be consistent with the approved State Implementation Plan. Prior consultation with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, as required by FHPM 7 -7 -9 Air Q ualit y � Guidelines, and the detail of the air quality analysis, is considered to have been accomplished and is documented in and by the Memorandum of Understanding, the Minnesota Department of Transportation g ' Pa po ation and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Noise A noise analysis for this project was done using the Federal Highway Administration g Y tlon Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model adapted for the TI -59 calculator. Calculations were made assuming a peak -hour volume of 10% of the A DT with 5% trucks evenly divided between heavy and medium trucks. ' Federal design noise levels for the receiver in a residen teal area are less than 70 dbA (L10)• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards are less than 65 dbA (L10), This project will not have a significant effect on noise in the area. The r ' roadway �s now four lanes wide in front of all residential receptors and the amount of lane widening proposed will have a minimal effect on noise. The results of the noise analysis showed the present L10 noise levels ranged from 65 to 68 dbA for houses adjacent to Lar nt J pe a ur Avenue. The projected year 2006 noise levels for the same houses ranged from g 66 to 69. dbA, due mainly to the projected increase in traffic volume. No house would oul experience an increase of more than 1 dbA. Since the human ear cannot distinguish difference of less than 3 dbA, the effect of this project on noise levels is insignificant. In considering construction noise, Minnesota Standard Specifications for ' � Highway Construction will apply. Section 7, Subsection 1701, states in Pa rt that the contractor V shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees in the performance of the construction. This would include any local noise control laws. No unique noise receptors have been identified in the area that would be severely impacted by the proposed construction and the construction activity is not expected to generate unusual or excessive noise. Water Pollution s Potential for water pollution will come primarily f rom erosion of soil exposed during construction activities. Because of the nature of the soils and the steep slopes in the area of the bridge, erosion control is an important consideration. This project cannot be accomplished without some disruption to the existing vegetation during the required shaping of structure berms to stable slopes and the reconstruction of the approaches. There may be some minor soil erosion during the early construction stages of this project. However, construction specifications and special provisions will provide for temporary and permanent means to minimize soil erosion. These means shall include but "not be restricted to the use of silt fences, sodding and seeding. No body of water is in direct contact with the construction site, so proper erosion control measures should be effective in preventing adverse water quality impacts. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Requirements An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not required for a project of this scope. National Historic Preservation Act The State Historic Preservation Officer has been contacted regarding this project. Correspondence regarding this matter is contained in the appendix of this report. No sites of historical significance are affected by this project. Controversial Issues The disposition of the bridge over the former Soo Line tracks has been a controversial issue. Ramsey County originally proposed to remove the bridge and eliminate the grade separation between Larpenteur Avenue and the nonmotorized trail to be constructed. Discussions with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources have resulted in the alternative recommended in this report. A previous draft Project Development Report for this project was prepared in 1984 which recommended bridge removal and filling in of the gap where the bridge was located. That report was not forwarded to the Federal Highway Administration because federal funds were not involved in bridge removal and because the bridge replacement issue between Ramsey County and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources had not been resolved. The issue has now been resolved. Aesthetic Values The proposed action is not anticipated to have a significant aesthetic impact on the area near the project. 6 Other Effects 4 Traffic disruption will occur Burin the period o • e g � f bridge removal and road construction at the bridge location. A detour will be necessary. F loodpl ai n This project is not within the limits of the 100• -year floodplain, therefore, -the requirements of Executive Order 11988 do not apply. This determination Department of Housing and P is based. on D _ g Urban Devel flood hazard boundary maps Cities of Saint Paul and Maplewood. Y p for the , Endangered Species The proposed project is located within i thin the ranges g in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife .Service Red Book for the Arctic and American Pe dlife Peregrine Falcons. The proposed proj g ect would not affect the species or their habitats because ' it is not near any bluff areas that have been identified as potential nestin sites. Farmland Protection Policy Act Compliance On July 8, 1986, County staff visited the Ramsey y County field office of the Soil Conservation Service. A review of the 1982 National Resource Inventor p roject is entire Y (NRI) map indicated the P j entirel within a delineated urban area, and therefore co no prime farmland. The site contains unique ns no uni farmland contains Iand nor other farmland. DETERMINATION STATEMENT Based on the Environmental Stud and in actor • Study dance with the guidelines in 23CFR 77.1, Environmental Impact and Related Procedures, Part ores it is determined that the proposed action is unlikely to precipitate foreseeable • changes • on the quality of the human environment and is appropriately classified as a categ exclusion, g xclusion. PROJECT PATH SELECTION In accordance with the State of Minnesota Action • ment of Plan guidelines, it is proposed that P this project will the development follow a minimal level th as shown: pa combined project development report and location /design � j / gn study report January, 1987 plans, specifications, estimate October, 1987 advertise for bids April, 1988 Because the minimal amount of right of w . project is owned b g way necessary for the Implementation of this P y Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - believed that a minimal level path will ode � a single owner, it i s ro osed project, � quately address the concerns related to the P P P ct. 7 PROJECT MANAGER The project manager is Paul Kirkwold, Deputy Director, Ramsey ount y Y Public Works Department, 167 Courthouse, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, telephone 298 -4127. 8 LOCATION /DESIGN STUDY REPORT i LOCATION STUDY REPORT Location of Prop os d Improvement Ramsey County Public Works Department proposes the reconstruction of Larpenteur Avenue (CSAH 30) from I -35E to Edgerton Street. The bridge over the former Soo Line tracks will be replaced with an arch structure. Location Alternatives This is a minimal level project, therefore, no location alternatives will be discussed. "Do Nothing" Alternative The "do nothing" alternative was rejected because the existing road is narrower than standards specify and has deteriorated. The bridge is deficient in width and is also deteriorating. Future Improvements rr -.wii r An overlay of Larpenteur Avenue from Edgerton Street to Parkway Drive is scheduled in 1987 or 1988. From Rice Street to I -35E, Larpenteur Avenue is to be reconstructed, although a specific date has not been determined for that work. DESIGN STUDY REPORT Design Standards Design standards for this project are: - urban state aid streets IM 1984 A. A. S. H. T.O. Green Book 1- A.A.S:H.T.O. - specifications for highway bridges. Design Elements The proposed roadway width is 52 feet between curbs which consists of four 12 -foot travel lanes and two --foot gutters on each side. Roadway surfacing will be bituminous of nine -ton design strength. There will be a minimum distance of five feet between the street and the sidewalk except over the arch structure. The . boulevard width shall be reduced at the bridge s crossing to minimize structure length and resulting costs. The maximum inslopes and backslopes for the road will be three to one. A minimum of two feet will be provided between the face of the curb and fixed obstructions such as utility poles, road signs or f ire hydrants. 9 Design speed will be 40 miles per hour based on stopping sight distance for 3.5 feet height of eye and 0.5 f eet height of object. ' Sidewalk width will be five feet. Concrete sidewalks are proposed on the north and south sides of Larpenteur Avenue for the entire project length. The provision Pe pr 1 g p ova s� on of sidewalks, will, however, be negotiated with the Cities of Saint Paul and Maplewood. 3 Storm sewers shall be designed for 10 -year return period rainfall. There are no stream crossings along the subject segment. As the existing alignment of Larpenteur Avenue involves only slight deflection angles, there will be no horizontal curves which limit or govern design speed considerations. The abrupt vertical dropoff at the structure location will require the placement of a traffic barrier to protect the drivers of errant vehicles and to minimize structure barrel length. Bri The bridge will be replaced with either a precast concrete arch (Betio) or a multi -plate steel arch structure. Competitive bids shall be sought on each structure type with the award being made to the bidder providing the least cost alternative. Either structure will meet Minnesota Department of Natural Resources requirements for a 24 -foot horizontal and 12 -foot vertical opening for the nonmotorized trail below Larpenteur Avenue, Railroad Crossings There are no longer any railroad crossings within the highway section termini. The bridge east of Desoto Street previously crossed over Soo Line Railroad tracks which have ..been abandoned. Traffic Volumes Existing average daily traffic ranges from 7000 to 7200 on this section of Larpenteur Avenue. Projected traffic volumes are 9900 per clay. Traffic Signals .Existing traffic signals at the intersection of Larpenteur Avenue with I -35E and with Edgerton Street will be retained. No additional signal systems are proposed. No modifications will be needed as a result of this project. Lighting No new lighting is proposed. Existing lighting will not be modified. Design Speed The design speed is proposed to be 40 miles per hour. Alternate Construction Options - Road An alternate construction option considered for the road is its repair. The subgrade of 10 the road is not adequate, there are drainage problems and the width of the road is narrower than county state aid standards specify. Repair of the road with an overlay would be only a short -term measure to improve the pavement surface. That overlay would not correct drainage or width deficiencies of this section of Larpenteur Avenue: For these . reasons, an overlay has been rejected. Options considered of constructing a road narrower than the four lanes proposed would not provide sufficient width for existing or future traffic. Constructing a road wider than four .lanes would be disruptive to adjacent property owners. The recommended alternative of reconstructing Larpenteur Avenue to four lanes, 52- foot width, with concrete curbs and gutters and a sidewalk will provide adequate lane width, surface condition and drainage provisions for the road; will provide sufficient road capacity to meet existing and projected transportation needs; and will provide for pedestrian needs. Alternate Construction Options - Bridge The option proposed at the location of the existing bridge carrying vehicular traffic over the former Soo Line tracks is to replace the bridge with a precast concrete arch or a multi -plate steel arch. Other options considered were: 1. Removal of bridge; fill gap with granular material. With the abandonment of the Soo Line railway under the bridge, the bridge is no longer needed to separate vehicles from trains. The gap left by the bridge removal would be filled and a new four -lane road would be constructed where the existing bridge was located. Users of the proposed nonmotorized trail would cross Larpenteur Avenue at grade to continue along the trail. M- This option was rejected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. That agency believes that an at -grade crossing of Larpenteur Avenue by potential trail users would be unacceptable because of the volume of traffic on Larpenteur Avenue. 2. Replace bridge with a new bridge. Replacing the existing bridge over the former Soo Line tracks with a wider structure to accommodate four lanes of traffic, pedestrians and bicyclists was considered. Desoto Street would retain its skewed intersection with Larpenteur Avenue if a new bridge was constructed because of the constraint of the bridge location. This alternate was rejected because it would be more costly than using an arch to separate trail users from Larpenteur Avenue. The bridge replacement would not allow realignment of the Desoto Street intersection with Larpenteur Avenue without acquisition of additional right of way. 3. Repair existing bridge. Since this would not correct major deficiencies of roadway width and sight obstructions from Desoto Street, this option was rejected. r . 11 4. widen existing structure. This option would correct the roadway width deficiency but would not correct sight obstructions caused by the grade of the bridge. The low sufficiency rating of the bridge would preclude federal cost participation in its rehabilitation. This option has, therefore, been rejected. The recommended alternative of an arch would remove the bottleneck condition at the bridge by widening the road to four lanes; remove a deteriorating bridge that is costly to maintain; allow a grade suitable for access from Larpenteur Avenue to a proposed trail below Larpenteur Avenue; improve safety, on Larpenteur Avenue by realigning Desoto Street to the east of its existing intersection with Larpenteur Avenue and lowering the grade of Larpenteur Avenue at the bridge location; provide space for pedestrians along Larpenteur Avenue, Approximate Costs The work proposed is estimated to cost $902,400. The costs are divided as follows: Storm .Sewer Sidewalk (two sides) Total 88,400 Federal County Aid State Aid Maple. St. Urban High way wood Paul $ 25,000 $358,000 196,000 $ 4 $ 4,000 62,000 . 8 8 8,800 6 000 23,000 23,000 $902,400 $144,800 $36,200 $420,000 $229,800 $35,800 $35,800 This estimate is based on federal bridge replacement funds, federal aid urban funds, state transportation funds and Ramsey County policy for cost participation. Detours and Disrur)tions The contractor will be required to maintain a suitable driving surface for local traffic throughout the duration of the project. The bridge removal and construction phase will require* the detouring of through traffic onto adjacent county roads. To minimize the time of the detour to the full extent possible, as much of the new structure as practicable shall be completed prior to the removal of the existing bridge. The available vertical and horizontal clearances under the existing bride indicate that a substantial portion of the completion is feasible. A traffic control plan shall be included in the construction plan to provide for the safe and orderly movement of traffic in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and sound engineerin judgment. Upon the completion of construction, permanent signing in accordance with the MU TCD will be placed. 12 Federal State Bridge Transpor- Total Reel. tation Bridge Removal $ 25,000 Construct Arch 181,000 144,800 $36,200 Construct Roadway 562,000 Storm .Sewer Sidewalk (two sides) Total 88,400 Federal County Aid State Aid Maple. St. Urban High way wood Paul $ 25,000 $358,000 196,000 $ 4 $ 4,000 62,000 . 8 8 8,800 6 000 23,000 23,000 $902,400 $144,800 $36,200 $420,000 $229,800 $35,800 $35,800 This estimate is based on federal bridge replacement funds, federal aid urban funds, state transportation funds and Ramsey County policy for cost participation. Detours and Disrur)tions The contractor will be required to maintain a suitable driving surface for local traffic throughout the duration of the project. The bridge removal and construction phase will require* the detouring of through traffic onto adjacent county roads. To minimize the time of the detour to the full extent possible, as much of the new structure as practicable shall be completed prior to the removal of the existing bridge. The available vertical and horizontal clearances under the existing bride indicate that a substantial portion of the completion is feasible. A traffic control plan shall be included in the construction plan to provide for the safe and orderly movement of traffic in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and sound engineerin judgment. Upon the completion of construction, permanent signing in accordance with the MU TCD will be placed. 12 Ri.p,ht of Wa Right of way needed to construct an arch structure would be 0.3 acres. This right of way would be acquired from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. No additional permanent right of way is anticipated .to be needed for other proposed work on Larpenteur Avenue, Project Manager The project manager is Paul Kirkwold, Deputy Director Ramsey County Public Works Department, .167 Courthouse, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, telephone 298 - 4127. 13 _r .,.' .1.. .v .r ... alu h R/W VARIES 39.5 MIN. 40' MIN. SEE PLANS 8" 14' 12' 12 ' 14' S' 8' PROFILE — 0.54' GRADE —0.18' —0.42` . 02' /FT .0 4' /FT 02' /FT .015' / FT .015/'FT .0 2 %FT 3' SUBCUT B624 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 1"— BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MN /DOT 2361 4 WALK 1 1/2"— BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE MN /DOT 2341 4 1/2"— BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE MN /DOT 2331 6" COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" — AGGREGATE BASE CL -5 MN /DOT 2211 (100% CRUSHED) SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 2'— UNIFORM . COMPAC71ON TYPICAL SECTION LARPENTEUR AVENUE STA. 48 +95• TO STA. 76 +25 VARIES VARIES SEE PLANS 2 12 14' 8 14 1 ' I ES 2' 3' S' 8' F5 ^� i� .015' / FT . 0 15'/Fi . .02 /F RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MAPLEWOOD Agreement between the County of Ramsey City of Maplewood Agreement No. 89005 Bridge ' MINN. PROJ. NO. BRM- M5103 (1)and the S.P. 62- 630 -21 Bridge 62554 Right of Way S.A.P. 62- 630 -35 S.A.P. 138-020-10 Road 30 at DNB. Trail Corridor S.A.P. 62- 630 -36 S.A.P. 138 - 020 -07 Account No. 47392 Re: Larpenteur Avenue Estimated Amount fr Ma plewood: Receivable I -35E to Edgerton Street _ Reconstruction and Bridge g 0 Brid a Replacement g p Right of Way $ 2 2 18 6.0 0 at DNB. Trail Corridor C Concrete Walls ' 21,360.95 Storm Sewer 106,199.06 Attachm Curb & Gutter 19,414969 Right of Way Estimate Total $147,799.75 Bridg e Estimate Road Estimate /Breakdown THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the City f Ma lewood oration. her y p � Minnesota, a municipal cor . P , hereinafter referred to as the City," and R Count political subdivision of the State of Minnesota her y t� County a hereinafter referred to as the County "; W ITNESSETH: WHEREAS, The County and the City desire to construct and rebuild Larpenteur Avenue between I -35E and Edgerton Street from a point 545 feet west of the west line of Section 17, T29N, R22 W to a point 2587 feet east of • the west line of Section 17, T29N, R22W along the north line of said Section 17 a distance of 2042 feet and WHEREAS, Larpenteur Avenue from I -35E to Edgerton Street ' ' City of St. Paul; and g is partially �n the WHEREAS, the City of St. Paul and the Count h Agreement No. 89006; and County a sep ate Cooperative I t WHEREAS, the work contemplated under this agreement has • plans which g s been divided into three separate P provide for the bridge replacement, right of way acquisition and road reconstruction; and y ac 9 WHEREAS, g the replacement of Bridge No. 7231 with Bridge designated by the Minnesota No. 62554 has been Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the Federal Bridge identified as MINN. PROJ. � Replacement funds and No. BRM M5103(1), and 89005 Page 1 of 5 F WHEREAS, this bridge replacement project has been designated b the ' o g Y Minnesota Department of Transportation rtation as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the County State Aid Highway funds and identified as S.P. 62-630-21 Bridge No. 62554; and 630 WHEREAS, the right of way acquisition project has been designated b the' Minnesota Department of Transp ortation � g y as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the County State Aid Highway funds and identified as S. 630-35; and A.P. 6 2- WHEREAS, the right of way acquisition project has been designated b Minnesota Department of Trans g y the P Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the Municipal State Aid Highway funds and identified g y ratified as S.A.P. 138- 020 -10• and WHEREAS, this road project has been designated b the Minnesota De Transportation as y Department of Trans p eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the County State Aid Highway funds and identified as S.A.P. 62- 630 -36• and WHEREAS, this road project has been designated b the Minnesota D a y Department. of Transportation s eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the Municipal State Aid Highway funds and identified as S.A.P. 138 -020 -0 • 7, and WHEREAS, plans for this project MINN. PROJ. NO. BRM -M5103 1 S.P. 2- - 21 Bridge ), 6 630 dge No. 62554, S.A.P. 62- 630 -35, S.A.P. 138 - 020 -10, S.A.P. 62- 630 -36 - 020 -07 showing proposed align ,and S.A.P. 138 improvement of County State Aid Highway 30 with g P p ment, profiles, , grades and cross sections for the i in the limits of the City s a co project has been presented y county state aid highway pro J p ted to the City; and • • tion, WHEREAS, the projects include, in addition to other thins right acquisition grading, concrete things, g t of way g g, curb and gutters, storm sewer, storm water holding ponds bridge replacement, sidewalks, and City utili d' g y y a J ust m ents and /or improvements; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has determined credit for storm sewer outfall lines llowable es previously constructed prior to the project, and the resulting Municipal portion of this storm sewer system ' ici a Y • n D.V. Halvorson m eligible far County State Aid and • p 1 State Aid Highway funds as present i M N • Engineer, office memorandu /DOT Hydraulics um dated July 27, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS • FOLLOWS. 1. The County shall prepare the necessary ans specifications y P � p ions and proposals, take bids, and with concurrence of the City and the City of St. Paul, recommend award of a contract for the construction of Bride No. 62554 to b • Department of g e awarded by the Minnesota De P Transport`Ltion; the County shall perform the construction inspection. p etion. 2. Upon completion of Bridg the bridge; No. 62554 the Count shall • e• however, the Y 1 own and maintain g , Minnesota Department of Natural Resources shall be res onsib enin� P le for usage and operation of the trail o P � and shall provide normal mai�iitenanee and access for that usage. . 3. The County shall prepare the necessary plans, de ' • royal of Y p � scriptions and estimates and with the approval the City, the City of St. Paul and the Minnesota Department of Transportation acquire the necessary ' P nt y r fight of ways i n accordance with procedures for reimbursement from State Aid funds. 89005 Page 2 of 5 4. Right of way required for the roadway construction is estimated 10096 eligible for CSAH funds e' to be g un s r imbursement and this portion shall be paid by the County, Y 5. Right of way required for the storm sewer and storm water r holding ponds beyond the road right of way shall be paid for at the same ratio as the storm sewer cost participation. 6. All road project right of way and temporary asements will be ' of the Count and y in the name highway rights of way on the y, parking and other regulations will be controlled by the County., All hi project which are y P J owned or acquired by the City shall be assigned by the City to the County. All storm sewer and storm water holding pond 1 i right of way in the City of St. Paul beyond the road right of way shall be the Count to the g Y assigned by County City of St. Paul. 749 The County shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications and ro os take .bids, and with concurrence P a�' rrence of the City and the City of St. Paul, award a contract for the roadway construction; the County shall erform the construction ' P tion inspection. 89 The City shall assist the Count in the ins ' County i of the sanitary sewer and watermain adjustments. The City shall lead discussions with the City f St. Paul aul Board of Water Commissioners on interpretation and administration of the plans and specifications relating to the watermain modification within the City, Y 90 The storm sewer system as shown in the plans and specifications is ' P eligible for construction cost reimbursement of 60.90% by Count State Aid fund b hydraulics memorandum m orandu y s b ased on the Y m and this portion shall be paid by the County. 100 The City shall pay for 30.65% of the construction cost of the storm sewer system which portion is attributable to contributing area from the City uts' ht of way and not eligible Y ide the road right Y g le for reimbursement from County State Aid Highway funds. The remaining 8.45% shall be paid by the City of St. Paul g y . 11. Upon completion of the project the Count shall own and maintain County aintain the storm sewer catchbasins and leads and the City shall own and maintain the storm sewer trunk lines within the City. Laterals and drains servicing property ' g P p ty within the City outside the road right of way and storm water holding ponds shall also be owned a maintained by the City. and 12. The City shall pay to the County 75% of the cost of concrete curb and gutters constructed wthin the City except for replacement of existin concrete curb and gutters. 13. The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of the new w s�dewalit constructed within the City which does not replace existin g sidewalk. 14. Upon completion of the project the City hall own and sidewalks within the City. y maintain the 15. The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of City utili ex improvements Y y tensions or im P provided in the plan within the City. 16. Any City utiliti or facilities modified or added to ' those provisions presently made in the plans and specifications may be incorporated in the ' supplemental agreement p e construction contract b Y PP g ment and shall be paid for as specified in the supplemental agreement. pp 1 89005 Page 3 of 5 17. Upon completion of the work on the sanitary sewer and watermain systems within the City, the City shall own and maintain the systems. 18. All liquidated damages assessed the contractor in connection with the work performed on the project shall result in a credit shared by the City of St. Paul, the City and the County in the same proportion as their respective total share of construction work is to the total construction cost without any deduction for liquidated damages. 19. The City shall pay its share of the right of way acquisition cost, as determined by the amounts actually paid to property owners plus appraisal and court costs to the County. This cost participation shall be due upon notif ication by the County of the amounts actually expended by the County on behalf of the City. 20. The City shall pay 10% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the contract proposed to be awarded, to the County as a preliminary engineering f ee. This f ee shall be due of ter receipt of bids and prior to award of a construction contract. 21. In addition to the preliminary engineering fee the City shall pay 8% of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the final estimated contract amounts, to the County a construction engineering fee. This fee shall be due upon notification to the City of the estimated final amounts due to the contractor. 229 All charges for services such as inspection and supervision within the City by the city of St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners shall be paid for by the Cti . Y 23. The City shall not assess or otherwise recover any portion of its costs for this project through levy on County -owned property. 240 The County shall, when a construction contract is proposed to be awarded prepare a revised estimate and cost participation breakdown based on construction contract unit prices and submit a copy to the City. The City agrees to advance to the Treasurer of Rainsey County an amount equal to the City total construction cost share plus preliminary engineering costs. The contractor shall then be aid b the County, P Y 25. Upon completion of the work, the County shall .prepare a revised estimate of cost and cost participation breakdown based upon the. contract unit rices and the actual units of work estimated ated to have been performed and submit a copy to the City. The construction engineering costs to be paid the Count b the City shall be based Y Y y ase on this estimated final construction cost. The County shall add to the City estimated final construction costs the preliminary engineering based on the contract as awarded and construction engineering costs, make necessary adjustments for liquidated damages, q g , if Y Y . any, and deduct City funds previously advanced for the project b the Cit The City agrees to pay to the County any amount due, be it more or less than the estimated sum of the first revised estimate. In the event the calculations show that the City greater amount than •s has advanced funds in g � due the County, the County shall refund the amount to the City without interest. 26. Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and specifications are hereby in all things approved. 89005 Page 4 of 5 r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to executed, g be CITY OF MAPLWOOD, MINNESO'T'A THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY By By* f Chairperson Its Board of Count y Commissioners By F Attest: Its Chief Clerk -Count Board County Date Date Approved as to Form: Assistant County Attorney Recommended for approval: Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director Ramsey County Public Works Department 89005 Page 5 of 5 Estimate of Right of ' way Cast Larpenteur Avenue from 1-35W to Edgerton Street Ramsey County S.A.P. 62-630-35 Maplewood S.A.P. 138 - 020 -10 Premised on no cost to Ramsey County for use of DNR property at Bridge or City of St. Paul property. Parcel HE /TSE DE Total. 1 $5,400 $5,400 2 1 $200 1 3 1 1,920 4 678 678 5 630 630 6 622.80 622.80 7 234 234 8 360 360 9 750 750 10 1 50 1,100 11 960 960 12 7 5,000 12,068 13 240 240 14 480 480 15 2 800 3 16 4 4 17 47,584 47,584 18 6 000 5 000 11 000 $35,368.80 $58,634 $94,002.80 Appraisals 18 x 500 = 9 000000 $103,002.80 Rounded to $103,000.00 Ramsey County CSAH Funds $ 74,698 Maplewood MSA Funds 22 St. Paul Local F tends 6 1I6 Total 103 HE - Highway Easement TSE - Temporary Slope Easement DE - Drainage Easement LA RP ROW COS "r r Right of Way Estimate for Drainage PARCEL `CSE DE SUB TOTAL APPRAISAL TOT d AL 12 $6,000 $5,000 $11,000 $500 $11,500 15 800 800 500 1 0 17 47,584 47,584 500 48,084 18 6,000 � 5 11 000 500 1 Total $12,000 $589384 $70t384 $ 2 9 00 0 $72,384 $72,384 x .609* _ $-44,082 Ramsey Coun y 72,384 x .3065 = 22,186 Maplewood 72,384 x .0845 = 6 St. Paul $72,384 Right of Way Cost of Sewer Construction * Based on Hydraulics Memo 7/27/88 WRL:m 1/11/89 F r ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE - ROSEY r COUt �T`Y — SEN FILE N0. 88019 BRM —M- 5103.(1 to /3/8s N0. ITEM EST. - UNIT TOTAL , am �.- r �. •- rr� � •_• ww r- Orr- •w•r-rr UNIT QUANo PRICE EST. PRICE 0401.601 — — r mew STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION r w_sw w w_ L . s . � w r w� �► w w r• 1 r — t• — w r w w 1500U . 00 r rr w - � w� w r • w _ w 1500000 0401.602 REV. BATTER SURFACE S.F. 3199 2.00 5398.00 0401.604 BUSH HA HAM SURFACE S . F . 708 2.50 1770.00 0401.605 DAMP PROOFING S.F. 541 1. )5 946o75 04029603 DRAINAGE SYSTEI! L • S • 1 18000 18000000 2118.501 AGGREGATE SURFAC I NS , CL. 2 TON 131 7050 982.50 24019501 STRUCTURE CONCRETE 1A43 C.Y. 323 210.00 67830.0 0 401.501 STRUCTURE CONCRETE. 3Y43 C•Y. 576 250.00 144000.00 401.513 CONCRETE PARAPET RAIL 3X46 L• F• �. 290 3 5.00 10150.00 401.541 REINFORCEMENT' BARS LB. 127780 0.40 51112.00 401.541 REINFORCEMENT BARS EPDXY COAT LB* 14 570 0.55 8013.50 a01.583 OR NAMENTAL METAL RAILING TYPE S -1 L.S. 290 25.00 7250.00 445.509 CONDUIT. SYSTEM (LIGHTING) L.S. 1 1200 *0 • 0 1200.00 451.505 AGGREGATE SACKFILL C.V. ( ) C.Y. 418 12.0o 5016.00 481.501 THREE-PLY JOINT wATERPR00FING L.F. 579 5000 2895.00 503.511 30" REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SEWER L.F. 200 40900 8000.00 TOTAL 348 563 � .75 t DATE 01- Mar -89 'I RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PAGE 1 ENGINEERS ESTIMATE S.A.P. 62-545 -01 N.S.A.P. 147- 020 -10 LARPENTEUR AVENGE - I3SE TO EDGERTON .... ST. PAUL ROADWAY COST/BREAKDO COST _ DATE: 08 MARCH, 1989 { { I I I { { } I S.A.P. 62- 630 -11 { S.A.P. 138-010-07 J STORK SEVER j ITEM NO. CONTRACT ITEM UNIT } UNIT j I PRICE I ESTI QUANTITIES I ESTIMATED I { AMOUNT } QUANTITY I AMOUNT I { QUANTITY AMOUNT I QUANTITY { AMOUNT } 2029.501 NOBILIIATION - � - - - -� -- - -. t.S. j 50000.00 { 1 I ;50,000.00 I 1 $SO,000.00 I - •_.._ . } 2101.501 - CLEARING _ I 2101.501 CLEARING ACRE I 1500.00 { 3 } $1,500.00 I� _` _ _ { _. -.- 1 -- _ } 2101.506 GRUBBING TREE ACRE { SO I j 9500.00 j SO 3 { $2,SOD.00 I $4,500.00 50 } - { 2101.507 _ GRUBBING _ TREE I SO I S@ 2 500.00 I S, I 50 #2,500.00 } 3 #4,500.00 I } 1101.501 REMOVE GUARDRAIL L.F. { 2.25 j 438 { #985.50 j 438 $985.50 I I - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- I 2104.501 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. I 2.50 { 75 { T =187.50 { 75 $111.50 I } I } 2104.91 REMOVE STORK SEVER PIPE L.F. I 1.00 { 66 { ;511.00 i sa $510.00 I I { '• } 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE VALK . _ _ - S.Y.. - } 2.00 I _ _ _ 67 { $134.00 { 61 134.00 ; I I I ... ( 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S.Y. I 5.00 { 15 { 315.00 $ I 75 $375.00 I 2104.501 REMOVE CATCH BASINS EACH I 1 oQ.DO I 14 I $1,800.00 i 14 ;1,100.00 { I I 2104.509 REMOVE MAN HOLE EACH { 250.00 { 1 { $250.00 I 1 $250.00 { - { 2104323. SALVAGE CASTING ASSEMBLIES - _ EACH I 90.00 I 15 I 1 1,350.00 1S $ 1, 350.00 } j - I 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. i 3.25 { 5399 { 117,546.15 { 5399 ,350.00 117,546.75 } j I _�.; _.�_.: _ _. �• : -- - - - - - -- .__._.____� { 210S.515 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION (P) } 2105.507 SUBGIADE EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. I 3.25 I 4809 I #15,619.25 { I I 4809 j �IS,629.25 } I 2105.512 SELECT 61AMULAR BO RROV (C.V.) C.Y. I C.Y. I 3.25 { S.00 I 18639 { 7966 160 576.75 3! } $ I 18639 1966 60 51 .1 $ 6 5 I i ;39,130.00 { { I I 2105.535 SALVAGE TOPSOIL (L.Y.) { 2130.501 WATER, OUST CONTROL C.Y. { (N)GAL.{ 1.00 } 15.00 60 2 0 I 120,100.00 { 2600 120,100.00 { { { { } 2211.501 AG6..BASE CLASS S, 1001 CRUSHED TOM { I 4.00 { 100 { 5300 } =1 { 137,100.00 } 100 5300 11 I 137,100.00 I I I } 2232.501 PAVEMENT PROFILING S.Y. I 2.00 { 2594 I $5, 2591 S 188.00 I { { 2331.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR NIXTURE TON I 160.00 j 315 50 400.00 31 154 1 400.00 � I 2331.510 B IMDEt CO UR SE MIXTURE TOM I 16.00 j 1664 } $26,621.00 i 1664 $1 j I _ • I 2331.511 BASF COURSE MIXTURE TON { 15.00 } 4186 j $64 { 4216 $54,290.00 { I I } 2331.531 TEMPORARY LAME MARKING ROAD'ST{ 26.00 { 35 } 1700.00 { 35 1100.00 { { { 2101.513 SAWCBT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1' DEPTH F l .. It 2.QQ I 1210 I ; 1,42 0.0 0 i 1210 19,420.00 I 2361.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON I 160.00 I 69 { $11 I 69 111,040.00 I I _ } 1361.501 WEARI96 COURSE MIXTURE TON I 18.00 I 1110 { 119,980.00 { 1110 ;1!,980.00 { { { } 0:41.605 B IT aM IMOGS DRIYEVAY RESTORATION S.T. i 25.00 I 450 } =11 { 450 111,250.00 { I 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL. { 2.00 } 2884 { $5,166.00 I 2884 $5 I I { 0411.503-- COMC.-BLOCK RETAINING WAIL -- _ S.F. { 10.00 { 1915 I $19,150.00 I 1915 119 { { 2442.501 REMOVE OLD BRIDGE L.S. { 15000.00 { i { $15 000.00 { 1 25 000.00 ; { I I 2451.511 COARSE FILTEI AGGREGATE i 2504.511 36' CM PIPE CULVERT C.Y. I 6.00 { 150 { 1 50 $ ' 0'00 { I { 150 { - $1,500.00 { { 1501.515 11' RC PIPE APRON L.F. I EACH { 40.00 { 250.00 { 91 { 3 I $3,540 00 { ' $150.00 I { ( I 91 j .2581.515 15 RC PIPE APRON EACH { 350.00 { 1 I $350.00 { I I 3 150.0 $ 0 I I 2501 -515 11 RC PIPE APRON � { EA 300.00 j 1 { $600.00 I I I 1 $350.00 I { 2501.515 36 1 RC PIPE APRON EACH } 450.80 { 1 { $450.00 { { ) 1 $600.00 { { 2 1-515 48' RC PIPE APRON EACH { 100.00 { 1 { $100.00 I { I 1 $450.00 { { 2502.541 4' PERF. P.F. PIPE DRAIN J 2503.541 11' RC L.F. I 4.00 { 3600 { $14,400.00 I 3500 { 14 400.00 $ { I 1 $100.00 { { PIPE SEVER, DES. 3006, CL II � { 2503.541 15 RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL. II L.F. { L.F. 20.00 I 180 { $5,600.00 { I I 280 $5,600.00 I J 1503.541 18' RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, Ct. II L.F. { i 15.00 { 30.00 { 1513 ) 534 1 ;31,125.0 { $16,020.00 6 { } I { 1513 $37,825.00 I { 2503.541 11' RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL. III L.F. { .0 320 { 115 { ;3,680.00 { i I 531 $16,020.00 I { 2503.541 21' RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, Cl. II L.F { 34.00 { 191 { $6,494.00 I 115 $3,680.00 { { 1503.541 24' RC PIPE SEVER, DES. 3006, Cl. II L.F. { 35.00 I 405 I ;14,115.00 I i - � 250 3.541 21' RC PIPE SEVER, DES. 3006 Ct. III F l.. } 31.04 341 I 112,911.00 j I I 401 $14,915.00 { ., I 341 $11,617.08 I DATE 08 Mar - 89 IANSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PAGE 2 - .. ENGINEERS ESTIMATE S.A.P. 62- 645 -01 - N.S.A.P. 141- 020 -10 LARPENTEUR AVENUE - I3SE TO EDGERTON ST. PAUL ROADWAY COST /BREAKDOWN COST DATE: 08 MARCH, 1989 { { ( I S.A.P. 62.630.21 { S.A.P. 138-010-01 I STORM SEVER { I UNIT ESTIMATED I ESTIMATED I { ITEN NO. CONTRACT ITEM UNIT I PRICE ( QUANTITIES I AMOUNT I QUAN AMOUNT I QUANTITY AMOUNT ( QUANTITY AMOUNT } -- - } 2503.541 30 RC PIPE SEVER, DES. 3006, CL. II L.F. ( 40.00 I 131 1 1 $5,240.00 I I I 131 is 240.00 } - 2503.541- 36 RC PIPE SEVER, DES, 3006 CL. III - - E.F. { -- - 55 -00 { --- - 261 {- 114 { -- - - _ .. { _ { 266 ' . ;14,630.00 I_ - } 2503.541 42' RC PIPE SEVER, DES. 3006, CL. IV R.F. 1 75.00 ( 651 ( 1491350.00 65a $49,350.10 } - -- -- - - _ - - - - - - - - _- -- _- { 2503.511 48' 1C PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL. V L.F. ( 85.00 { 112 i ;14420.00 ( I I 172 114,620.06 1 - i 2506.506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN A _ L.F. 1 200.00 ( 76.9 ( $15,380.00 } I 1 ]6.9 ;15,310.10 ( . } 2506.506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN C L.F. ( 225.00 ( 9.1 ( ;2,115.00 I I i 9.4 $2,115.01 1 -' I 2506.506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN D L.F. i 250.00 ( 11 i $20,250.00 ( i { 11 120,150.00 ( I 2506.509 SPECIAL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH I 2000.00 I 1 1 $1,0@0.00 I I 1 �, 1 - { 2501.501 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN LP4 L.F. { 200.00 I 140.2 { $21,040.01 ( I { 140.2 $18,040.8! } 2506.501 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN 1C -2 L.F. { 200.00 ( 10.5 12,100.00 I I } 10.5 $1,100.00 I } 2506.501 CONSTRICT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN H L.F. I 200..00 i ts.4 i $ I I I 19.4 $ 3,t8 0.aa I I 2506.519 CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE 1 -1133 EACH { 150.10 1 15 I $3,150.00 I I 1 15 $ 3,]50.00 I I 2506.511 CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE 1.3061-1 EACH ( 251.00 I 2 ( $500.00 ( I I 2 MOM I } 2501.511 CASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE 1- 2502.8 EACH { 2S 1.00 ( ` S I $1,25!.00 _- - .- I I S $1,250.0@ } ( 1506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH { 100.00 1, 11 ( 1 3,200.00 16 3 200.00 _ _._._...__- ._- _-- • -�. -- . I ISOI.102 RECONSTUCT MANHOLE EACH { 1000.00 I 1 1 $1,000.00 ' f } 2S11.501 RANDOM 1IPRAP CLASS III C.Y. { 40.00 { 15 I 1600.00 ( { I i s =600.00 1 { 2521.501 } 2531.501 4 CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE CURB 9 GUTTER, DES. 8624 S.F. { L.F. 1.30 { $.So { 14521 1 $9!,186.40 { 603 $183.90 I 13925 $18 I I 1531.S01 9' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S.Y. I 25.00 1 6611 I I S11 I $ 43,400, SO 1 112 { 4146 511 ;16,945 00 ( 111,715.00 I ?531 ;16,451.50 I I 1 I ( 1531.601 ' PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP EACH 1 306.00 { 14 ( $4, 200.00 I 14 14,200.00 ( I I I 2554.501 TRAFFIC BARRIER DES 8 1307 L.F. i 13.00 i 125 { 2 !25.00 1 I 215 12 , 1 25.00 1 I I { 1554.523 TWISTED END TREATMENT EACH ( 500.00 I 4 } ;2,000.00 4 ;2,000.00 { ( 0551.603 CEDAR SPLIT RAIt FENCING t.F. ( 5.00 i 640 I $3,200.00 i 640 13,200.00 I I I { 0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. I 15000.00 ( 1 ( $15 1 i ;15 ( 0565.602 � � 100P DETECTOR 9 16 EACH I 300.00 I 4{ 11,200.00 I 4 $1,200.00 I I I ( 1515.602 LOOP DETECTOR 1' X 20' EACH { 600.00 I 1 { 1600.00 1 1600 I I I { 0565.601 RELOCATE HANDHOIE EACH I 15.01 I 1 I 115.06 ( 1 1 , $ 5 00 { 1 { 1 2S1S.501 ROADSIDE SEEDING ACRE } 200.00 I - 3 I ;600.00 I 3 1600.00 1 I I - - - -- ( 1515.501 { 2515.505 SEED NIITURE 5 SODDING POUND { 3.00 I 15@ { 1450.00 I I I 150 450.00 - -- ~V $ { - 2315.511 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 1 S.I s TON ( 1.25 { 200.00 ( 9223 I 3 ( $11521]5 1 , . 1600.00 9113 $11,521.15 I I f ._ -• -- -- { 1515.519 DISC ANCHORING ACRE { 50.00 { 3 1 1150.00 { { 3 $600.00 I ( 2515.531 FERTILIZER TON I 400.00 1 0.15 { $300.00 1 ( I 3 $150.00 { { 0504.601 RELOCATE HYDRANT EACH { 800.00 { i I 6 400. $ 00 { , 1 I $6,400.00 { { ( 0.15 $300.00 1 1 ( 6504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH I 250.00 I 2 I 1500.00 I 2 $500.0 I I { 1 1504,602 ADJUST VALVE Box EACH { 125.00 I 1 I $815.00 { 1 $115.00 1 { 1 1 4504.603 LOWER 8' WATER MAIN L.F. I 15 I 500 { $12,500.00 { 500 $12,500 00 I I 1 = I 52 8' WATER GATE VALVE EACH I 150.00 1 1 I 1150.00 { 1 $]50.00 } 004.60 3 LOWER 16' VATERMAIN L.F. } 15.00 I 550 1 $8,400.00 { 560 $5,400.00 I I 1 I 0504.605 2' RIGID INSULATION S.Y. I 11.00 { 133 { $4,194.01 { 133 $4,194.00 I NON - PARTICIPATING I I SUBTOTAL = { $943,018,40 { 1614,829.15 { $34,554.00 1 $293,635.25 1 0504.603 TRENCH i BACKFILL, 16' VATERNAIN EIT L.F. i 10.00 ( I 141 { I $1,400.00 } 1 I ( ( } { TOTALS = ( 1945,118.40 { 1614,129.15 { 134,554.00 1 1193,635.25 1 LARPENTEUR AVENUE • I35E TO EVGERTON PROJECT TOTAL = $945 ST, PAUIjMAPIfYOOQ ROADWAY COST/BREAKDOWN COST STORM SEVER SPLIT TOTAL = $293,635.15 S.A.P. 62-630-21 60.95 $178,823.87 S.A.P. 138.020.07 30.65% 199,999,20 ST, PAUL 8045% $2 #,812.18 1293,635925 - ST. PAUL COST BREAKDOWN PRICE z QUANTITY = COST ENGINEERING fCONSTRUCTION TOTAL CURB I GUTTER 75% OF $6.50 z 3302 = $16,097.15 $1,609.13 $1,287.78 #18,994.76 STORM SEVER 8.45% r a r _ _ w r _ _ - _ r • - - - _ r _— r _ - r - $2 #,812.18 $2,481.21 r _ • _ r _ _ r _ • w _ _ r r _ • r r - _ r _ _ • - r _ - w r r _ . w _ r • r w r _ w _ �. • _ r $1,984.97 w _ - r r r w - w • $19,278.37 w _ _ _ r ESTIMATED' CONSTRUCTION COST r _ _ w _ r _ r r _ w _ • $ #9,,273.13 " = STORM SEVER RIGHT OF WAY $6,116.00 - r_ w r r w_• w r_ r $5 #,389.13 MAPLEWOOD COST BREAKDOWN PRICE z QUANTITY = COST f ENGINEERING #CONSTRUCTION= TOTAL CURB I GUTTER # 75% = $16, #51.50 f $1,645.15 f $1,316.12 = $19, #11.77 SIDEWALK = #18,102.50 f $1,810.25 # $1,448.20 = $11,360,95 _ STORM SEWER 30.65% __ r__— w r r w_ w r w r w_ w_ w _• r r r— w w w r r r w r w� w w_ w w w r w w w r w w--- = $89,999.10 f $8,999.92 f w �. _ w r w—_ w_— r w w_• �. w r w r r r r__— w_ w w w w r w w r• �, r w w r r w w w w w— �_ r r w w w w w r w w w r w r r r_ r r w w w r r r r r r r w w- w �-- r r w w $7,199.9# =$106 r w• w w r w -- r w w r r w r r ' r w_ r_ r w- w• r_ r — r -- w w ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST _ w- -______ r w_ $125,611.83 _ STORM SEVER RIGHT OF WAY $12,186.00 #147,197.83 FROM PAGE 2 OF RIGHT- OF•WAY EStIMATE .. .. ............ ... .,.... ... � k.+ta .. :.. _. . . ... .��- '�w•�:ae:,.ua,:u:J::m .. �.mwrm•�;�a.,�e:,�'� e�sil�w - - «.e � :EO:u � - ...... ....... .. .,,.+:«.. , .ai �.v�sr .w.a.,. +a,.u.c. +u:�:s. ."_ - �......X.,.�.,� ..,.,....,,u�� .,.,... -.,. _.. � z,..o — i — ..� .♦; :w,..,bwa'• xU"�t' ' .+:wlw ate' fez: .. ..................�. _,�,. �—,._.�— .:.Z.. .�...__�......._a�: �.. �s.— ,�.— s...a —�� z: . .,_...y r .... .. PROJECT NO. .86-27. LARPENTEUR AV-35E TO EDS PAGE I OF 2 D/P NO. QUANTITY' CHECK : LIST I biL.- Wei I Ui COL. 2) .'STORM SEWER-RESI DENT I AL UN I TS.. COL. .:,= F . F .L::,�:..lw C01 - 4) ST S F W ER- CC3MME RC; TGL Sm Em PIN NO. COL I 'COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 0.00. -1.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 .., ..STDRM SEWER-RES I DENT IL - UNITS 0.00 • 0.00 _-0.00 33 2 STREE L F. F .: COL. -COMMERCIA ' ' 3 rnl� m Eli S F 4 PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 7 �17-29_22_33_0008 ... 0.: 00 1 00 0.00 0. 012 8 0.00 0.00 9 uft 010. woo 1. 00 . 10 17-29-22-33-0011 0.00 1.00 0.00 1-. 0 0 -4.11 12 17-29-22-33-0012 0.00 1.00 0.00 0. 00 J'a 171-29-22-33-0014 0.00 14 17-29-22-33-0015*:,�- 1 , 00 .: 1 r 00 0« 00 0.00 A -thi7l 4 IC - 1 17-29-22-33-0017 0.00, 1.00 0 . L 71 0 0. O 17 0.00 1. 0.00 0.00 zl 410 .17-29-22-33-0020 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 -.--.. ._ �.__._. `_.._. -. _ _ ..._..__. 20 17-29-22-33-*1021 ..14 1 -10 0.14 1.00 0.00 0.00 zi I .-%- a A% =_ Q Qa - - 1. 00 _0 r-0Q Z2 7-21:3-22-33-0023 0. 00 21.00 0.00 0.00 23 .17-29-22-33-0024 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 24 17-?P-2 1.00 1.00 X`r LL, A 0. V.0 25 1.00 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-33-0027 oi. 00 1.00 0.00 0.00 77 Z 2:: z 00 GL 17-29-22-33-0029 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 0w 00 -17-29-22-33-0030 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 30 - 0-9- 31 0.00 1.00. 0.00 0.00 .32 17-29 22-33-0033 0.00 1.00 0. 00 0.00 33 034 . __w 1.00 0.00 0.00 34 17-29-22-�33-0035 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 -_ _.. ... .__ _...._._. _.._.._ . _ _ ... ._ _.. _ . . as 17-29-22-33-0036 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 36 7- 1. _00 0.00 0.00 37 1. 1.00 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-33-0039. 1.0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 39 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.0 17-29-22-34-0038 0.00 0 0 . ..... 0* 0_______, ___ _._.._ . . _ ..._..___ --._ -_ _ _. __... _ ._.. _ .. _..._ _ . _ .... - -- . .17-29-22-34-0039 .1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 42 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 ,43 2 0r 00 1.00 0.00 0. 00 44 17-29-22-34-0045., 1.0.0 .1.00 0.00 0.00 45 1.00 0.0 0 0.00 46 17-29-22-34-0047 1.00 0.00 0 - 0 . 0 0 0. t' 47 .17-29-22-34-0056 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -22-34-0057 1.00 0.00 0.00 0. ('410 49 :, 17. 29 -22-34-0064, 1 . 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . ____ -- __ -- so 5 d 1 7- 2 9 -22 3 st 1-4-006 .1. .! 1.00 0. 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 18-29-212-44-00011 0.00 0.00 0.00 871 280. 00 18-29-22-44-0002 0.00 0.00 00 3 56 0 00 -- ... 53 18-29"22-44-0003 0r 00 0.00 0.00 43560.00 51% _18-a9-22-44--0004 55 0.00 0.00 0.00 43560.00 0 0.00 0000 18-- 29 - 22 57 00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 I a-jaa=22- Opoz .0 0 0 0.00 0.00 PROJECT NO., .86- LARPENTEUR AV•35E TO EDO PAGE 2 OF 2 08-22-1989 D/P NO. QUANTITY CHECK LIST I biL.- Wei I Ui COL. 2) .'STORM SEWER-RESI DENT I AL UN I TS.. COL. .:,= F . F .L::,�:..lw C01 - 4) ST S F W ER- CC3MME RC; TGL Sm Em PIN NO. COL I 'COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 0.00. -1.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 0.00 _-0.00 0.-, 00 bo co so ilt T zo k-9 -lp x. sa 17 -465.97 3. 4-1 0 Ji Q—Q 17- 29-22-33 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA LARPENTEUR AVENUE PROJECT 86-27 INTERSTATE 35E TO EDGERTON STREET 27 0 xx 2. %p vo) Q _ 6 fL I T 3 0 We "It ON W t hG to 0 01 0 30 4�. 31 K INGS TON 0 K I 0 AV E. 0 bi 443 0 7 ~ 07 . 8 1 t0 7 �s a 0 18 53 171 li O.Z.1 28 ftc. 17 ( �` rA � 0 tf 7 12 a 0 � I ( � .. - ac 3 - 9 OT 4 it z6b ac A, L 7 0 0 G — 0 ,r t- 3 1() 5 - Za ac 4 70) 13 17t. 3 1 z 45 5.5 Q o 0 (D ti r I •� -410.5ce a w to 33 tp - IQ I r C) [ -7 '3A3 i n T kA- 850 33* A 1 f ril 0 f f r— / SCALE lr': 400' Iri rJ 6 c 4A D D r "' z a L 16T. T, 77.50 77. 50 77.50 77.30 81.5o /0, _ J I co,-- 4 ,g ( 4 --m. -7-00 - - 0 .77 26C. 7 0 LA T-5 41co r 157 0 ,,, T.5. ZA) !P -157 ` _' <I } IS 4607 • .(.0- 57 co Z OF4T 15 61.041 z c 7 73 \191 0 44 CAe- (44) 0 /14 2. Z s Z .3 0 Ji Q—Q 17- 29-22-33 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA LARPENTEUR AVENUE PROJECT 86-27 INTERSTATE 35E TO EDGERTON STREET 27 0 xx 2. %p vo) Q _ 6 fL I T 3 0 We "It ON W t hG to 0 01 0 30 4�. 31 K INGS TON 0 K I 0 AV E. 0 bi 443 0 7 ~ 07 . 8 1 t0 7 �s a 0 18 53 171 li O.Z.1 28 ftc. 17 ( �` rA � 0 tf 7 12 a 0 � I ( � .. - ac 3 - 9 OT 4 it z6b ac A, L 7 0 0 G — 0 ,r t- 3 1() 5 - Za ac 4 70) 13 17t. 3 1 z 45 5.5 Q o 0 (D ti r I •� -410.5ce a w to 33 tp - IQ I r C) [ -7 '3A3 i n T kA- 850 33* A 1 f ril 0 f f r— / SCALE lr': 400' rJ voc. 1150303 c ti L 16T. T, (4 4B 0 ri 0 J I co,-- 4 ,g ( 4 *p 0 7 0 LA T-5 41co r 157 0 ,,, T.5. ZA) !P -157 ` _' • .(.0- 57 Z OF4T 15 61.041 z c 7 0 18S 5 71 of 5 bC 0 /14 2. Z s .3 CC 0 Ji Q—Q 17- 29-22-33 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA LARPENTEUR AVENUE PROJECT 86-27 INTERSTATE 35E TO EDGERTON STREET 27 0 xx 2. %p vo) Q _ 6 fL I T 3 0 We "It ON W t hG to 0 01 0 30 4�. 31 K INGS TON 0 K I 0 AV E. 0 bi 443 0 7 ~ 07 . 8 1 t0 7 �s a 0 18 53 171 li O.Z.1 28 ftc. 17 ( �` rA � 0 tf 7 12 a 0 � I ( � .. - ac 3 - 9 OT 4 it z6b ac A, L 7 0 0 G — 0 ,r t- 3 1() 5 - Za ac 4 70) 13 17t. 3 1 z 45 5.5 Q o 0 (D ti r I •� -410.5ce a w to 33 tp - IQ I r C) [ -7 '3A3 i n T kA- 850 33* A 1 f ril 0 f f r— / SCALE lr': 400' 1 1 r- - I—- )13.4 z 3 Z C6.7 5 co 0 10 q I M _,q 1 19 woo / A -4W Ri I t y 0 � 1154 .4 40 z 120. r co lZo. �4 1 Z0.7 143 33 no V *4 40 0 7 0 1 50 14 0A, 031 5 2 1* \,9 01 20 C o 7 r -1 11 rl 1 3 (�) y ry N 8 7 y A 25 1 4 3 - 5 TI 2 4 5 (8) co 7 to 12, 3+ 25 r WY 23 17 rat \.9 24 7 40 2 7(/0)l U � 1 � 1 M r 7 &c • ( 2 3 OPIN 15 �a�� 0 0 Qoj-Z JAO 4o Ir 14 SO Vo Z 2�_ u j s 20 71 1 rlA 4 T_ v c c ?I 0 _F ";(14 3 I I 10 L3): 1 "_ I' 20 ot I z (.31)19 2 17 C) 0 .1,? (7 9 0 J 11 0 A4- ( 24-) 10 4) O N lfb -3 1 1.) 1 -1- 0 10 s a 18 0 17 b 14 0 15 .33 . f 41, 4 14 ry 12 A 9Q— r* 010 ? - _-- K INGSTON -AVE. Lot A 3' - 3 9 �t�1} -) �o _ ^'► I I lb Lcl Teo 22 115 0 64 7) 0- 21 2(9 1 4,0 a 69) 0 6 7 0 Zo 08 _P) .5D 0 to 5 6. q1t (+-2- _r - -7 070 04r, - 74- ell — 23 (-77) G 0 4, L co :36 23 p '7 0 N �8/ or 3� 080 , I.tu � z I d 6 -):.7 >'- o !L 0 La zo 0 131:2 1 °„ �� L 7 Q 18 t 1 ' 'Cco3) 19__ I i (�oA) ' LO 40 _T a 40 9(41) 0 T 4 3 4— Li 33 45 4 4 04 u; r 0 0 �) `'�`� 1(0 - 17 14 o o I 11L 0 off S to 4 0 ce • zi v 17 g N7 _T7 Vj I D "t N of M.L_► I /.S` / 1 ^�` Q�Q 17�29�22�34 PROPOSED 'ASSESSMENT AREA LARPENTEUR AVENUE PROJECT 86-27 INTERSTATE 35E TO EDGERTON STREET SCALE " 0- 400" 1 wm - in � � ty Limits AVE* zo caw �. Q-Q 18- 29-22-44 �9 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA LARPENTEUR AVENUE PROJECT 86-27 INTERSTATE 35E TO EDGERTON STREET SCALE 1" : 400" I I low WE CANADA Y Lake.- . Calcium Bedj,.-: LLMAN AV MT VERNON AV a. _j DOWNS A g ROSELAWN A 13 BELLWOOD AV c SUMMER AV Iq cn 4. to w z 2 i_ C) U w GSTON r w 0 27 cl. i, co 6 w and \ L g ke .} �� fLah PA UL GENERAL ASSESSMENT AREA PROPOSED 'ASSESSMENT AREA LARPENTEUR AVENUE PROJECT 86-27 INTERSTATE 35E TO EDGERTON STREET SCALE N/A @) I �,� _ v_ / .. SAINr RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Larpenteur Avenue, Interstate 35-E to ' Edgerton, City Project 86-27, by construction of 52' wide street, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, bridge, ' utilities and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Larpenteur Avenue, Interstate 35-E to Edgerton, City Project 86-27, by construction of 52' wide street, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, bridge, Utilities, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,115,000. 3. A public hearing will be held in the cmuncil chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 25th day of September, 1989, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. _=~ AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Aotion}.V Councilv TO: City Manager End«ro Modified...., FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bej mnte --- Da" SUBJECT: Walter Street Project 84-14, Change Order One DATE: August 21, 1989 Introduction Attached is a proposed change order for the subject project in the amount of $1,250. A resolution to approve the change order is also attached. Back a r Q Und The hydrant at the corner of Frost and Walter Street was not located as shown in the records. It was necessary to extend the hydrant lead to avoid a conflict with the curb returns of Frost Avenue. An extension was also placed on the hydrant to rectify the minimal ground clearance of the nozzles. Recommendation It is recommended that Change Order One be approved. BAI Jw Attachments RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 84-14 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and ' WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 84-14, Change Order One., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order One in the amount of $1,250. Note: Fill out form and bring to clerical staff to type final copy on Wp501 Contract StatUS Original Contract: Net Change of Prio/ Order No. to Change This Change Revised Contract: ----` ----- ---------' ----' ----- ---------- Time Cost- r- � ' -D Change ~~~�. No.� Order: cr- Approved Approved . / Agreed to by lContractor by Its M o 2/ � i, r- �- En c3 in 4er Title CHANGEO.FRM CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ' MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Project Name: Change Order No,: /�«» Project No.: Date: 9 /7 1 /9,R Contractor: /io The fo|lowing changes shall be made in the contract documents: Unit Description Unit lotal �7A r�2 LY Contract StatUS Original Contract: Net Change of Prio/ Order No. to Change This Change Revised Contract: ----` ----- ---------' ----' ----- ---------- Time Cost- r- � ' -D Change ~~~�. No.� Order: cr- Approved Approved . / Agreed to by lContractor by Its M o 2/ � i, r- �- En c3 in 4er Title CHANGEO.FRM Original Contract: Net Change of Prior Change Order No. to No. : Change This Change Order: Revised Contract: Approved $43,768.75 -- 11250.00 $45,018.75 � Mayor Approved Agreed to by Contractor by M a?) L11A Its Title CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Project Name: Walter Street Change Order No.: One Project No.: 84-14 Date: 8/07/88 Contractor: Ro-So Contracting, Inc. The following changes shall be made in the cont/act documents: Unit Unit Quantit Price Total Move Existing Water Hydrant EA 1 $1250.00 $1250.00 Contract StatUS Time Cost Original Contract: Net Change of Prior Change Order No. to No. : Change This Change Order: Revised Contract: Approved $43,768.75 -- 11250.00 $45,018.75 � Mayor Approved Agreed to by Contractor by M a?) L11A Its Title Aotion by Counci:,:1 Endorsed,.,_,._ Modified.. Rej ecte . AGENDA REPORT Date TO: FROM: RE: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager Staff Services Coordinator �- SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY August 22, 1989 Attached is a copy of the City's Sexual Harassment policy. The policy outlines the definition and types of sexual harassment, and details procedures for handling a complaint. We will be continuing the training for employees that was started with Department Heads. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve the Sexual Harassment Policy* GJ B : kaz DISCRIMINATION /SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY POLICY The City of Maplewood is committed to providing a work environment that is free of discrimination. Any type of discriminatory action or harassment because of race, age, religion, sex, or' nati oval origin is a violation of City policy and is prohibited. This policy applies to all City officials and employees while performing their duties as employees within or outside th -e workplace. Guidelines issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under Title VI.I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 reaffirm that sexual harassment is an unlawful employment practice. In keeping with the City's policy of compliance with all laws prohibiting all forms of discrimination, sexual harassment in any form will not be tolerated. DEFINITION - SEXUAL HARASSMENT GUIDELINES The EEOC Guidelines state that unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute harassment when: 1* submission to such.conduct is made.either explicitly or implicitly as a term or condition of an individual's employment, or 2, submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual, or 310 such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an i n d i v i d u a l ' s work performance or creating an intimidating, h o s t i l e , or of fen s i ve working environment, Other behavior, whether subtle, overt, or otherwise, which constitutes sexual harassment includes, but is not limited to : 1, verbal harassment (epithets, derogatory remarks, or slurs); 2* physical harassment (gestures, assault, impeding or blocking movement, or any physical interference with normal work or movement) 3, visual forms of harassment (derogatory posters, letters, poems, graffiti, cartoons, or drawings); and 40 requests for sexual favors or unwanted sexual advances. 1 of 2 DISCRIMINATION /SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY PRACT.I C E Conduct that might be interpreted as sexual harassment can be perceived differently among employees. Anytime an employee feels that he or she is being subjected to sexual harassment in any form, or.who believes he or she has witnessed sexual harassment in any form, must bring this to the attention of the City. In order for the City to deal with the problem, employees must report such offensive conduct or situation to their Supervisor, Department Head, Staff Services Coordinator, or City Manager.. All supervisors and Department Heads are required to immediately report any allegations to the Staff Services Coordinator or the City Manager. PROCEDURES All complaints which are made w i l l be promptly investigated and resolved. .Every attempt will be made to maintain the employee's confidentiality and .provide protection against retaliation. A record of the complaint and the findings will become a part of the complaint investigation record and the file will be maintained separately from the employee's personnel file If the facts support the allegations, the perpetrator of the sexual harassment will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including discharge. Any official or employee found to have made a false complaint or found to have given knowingly false information during an investigation of such a complaint may also be subject to disciplinary action. 2 of 2 AGENDA N0. 1 ' `� AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Staff Services Coordinator -A 0-& RE: GROUP INSURANCE COVERAGE DATE: August 22, 1989 Action by Counc3,l, :1 Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date We have been notified by Blue Cross /Blue Shield that they are declining renewal of our employee health insurance plans (Hospital AWARE and AWARE Gold) unless they are the sole carrier for our October 1 renewal. We are in the process of obtaining premium rate quotes from two different options for replacing the Blue Cross coverage. I expect to have this information for the upcoming Council meeting. GJB:Inb AGENDA NO. )',/ AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: Endorsed - ..,, T0: City Manager M °difled--- -_..._ Re,jectec7 FROM: Staff Services Coordinator RE: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN DATE,: August-22, 1989 INTRODUCTION Attached is a copy of the City's Affirmative Action Plan which has just been certified by the State of Minnesota, Department of Human Rights. This certificate is valid for two years. � w 0%, 1i0% e%1^ ■ IaI� Recent legislation requires all political subdivisions with more than 20 employees to have a state certified affirmative action plan in order to be eligible for state aid, grants and contracts which exceed $50,000. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution endorsing the principle of equal employment opportunity and the Af_f�rmative Action Plan. GJ6:1 nb RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood endorses the principal of equal employment opportunity, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reaffirm its long-standing commitment to equal employment opportunity, and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that mere good intent and the lack of overt discriminatory practices does not assure equal opportunity in employment, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a positive, result - oriented equal employment opportunity program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council declares that it is the policy and intent of the City of Maplewood to provide equality of opportunity in employment to all persons and to prohibit discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, or age in all aspects of the City's personnel policies, programs, and practices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the Affirmative Action Policy and Program, and directs the City Manager to implement this program. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood. John C. Greavu, Mayor ATTEST: Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk S o��'fHE . S? g drr CERTIFICATE f FIANCE Tfie ��t,. of Maplewood is Fieredy certified b Y tfie Department of Human Rights, State of Minnesota, as affirmative actwnpfan approvedb tFie Commissioner. TFiis certification shalfextend for two years deytnning August 17, 1989 and is sub ect to revocation or suspension 6y tfw Commisstonerof Human Riyhts for faiCure to make agood rt to implement the affirmative actwnpfan. -- 1 x I 111 I �. . .% Commissioner of Human Rights CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM November 1988 Revised: 07/01/89 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. .EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT . 2 III. ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM 3 IV, DISSEMINATION OF POLICY • 5 V'* ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 6 VI WORK FORCE AVAILABILITY AND UTILIZATION /UNDERUTILIZATION , . ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0,0 . . 7 VII. GO A L S AND TIMETABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 VIII. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION . . . . . . . . . 13 I.X. MEASURES TO FACILITATE IMPLEMENTATION OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS . ..15 X. INTERNAL AUDIT OF REPORTING SYSTEM 20 XI. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS 22 XII, INTERNAL DISSEMINATION OF POLICY . . . . . . • 25 XIII. RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . • • 26 XIV. DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS 27 I PROJECT DESCRIPTION RELATIONSHIP OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Local 9 overnments in Minnesota are creations of the State and subject to the absolute sovereignty of the legislature. The Minnesota Constitution authorizes t Legislature he Minnesota to provide for the "creation. , org anization, administration, con-solidations division and dissolution of local government units and their functions. Maplewood , ewood o erates under the Council-Manager form of Tt�eCztyof P g government (called Opt ioT%al Plan R in State statute)* Under Optional Plan 8, the elected city council consists of a mayor and four council All of i s and decisions are the r e s p o n s i b i l i t y members. policy legislative of the city.council. The council delegates the administrative duties to a city manager. Within this format, the City of Maplewood acts as an agent of the State in the enforcement of statewide standards and 9 policies as defined in rule and statute . The City of Maplewood last received Federal Revenue Sharing Funds in T y P .. 1986. State and Federal Lawcon Funds were last received in 1987. State fun ding din since 1984 has included Municipal State Aid, Police Aid, Homestead Credit and Local Government Aid. Occasional grant funding is received from Co inty, Metropolitan Regional and State to carry out specific programs authorized by State statutes. -1- II. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY STATEMENT This is to affirm the City of Mapl ewood' s policy of providing equal n't to all e and a ap for employment in accordance opport y PP . with all applicable Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action directives and regulations of federal, State and Local governing bodies or agencies thereof, specifically Minnesota Statutes 363. The Ci ty of Maplewood will not discrimi against or harass any employee - or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, ag e , marital status or status with regard to public assistance. The City of Maplewood will take Affirmative Action to ensure that all emp loyment practices are free of such discrimination.. Such employment practices include, but are not limited to, the following: hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, selection, layoff, disciplinary action, termination, rates of pay or other forms of comp ensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The City of Maplewood will use its best efforts to afford minority and female business enterprises with the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in the performance of subcontracts for construction projects in which the City engages. The City of Maplewood will commit the necessary time and resources, both financial and human, to achieve the goals of Equal Employment Opportuni and Affirmative Action. The City of Maplewood fully supports incorporation of non- discrimination a nd Affirmative Action rules and regulations into contracts. The City of Maplewood will evaluate the performance of its management and supervisory i p ersonnel on the basis of their involvement in achieving p sor y p these Affirmative Action objectives as well as other established criteria Any employee of the City wh does not comply with the Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Procedures as set forth in this Statement and Plan will be subject to disciplinary action. The City of Maplewood has appointed Gail J. Blackstone, Staff Services Coordinator, to manage the Equal Employment Opportunity Program. Her responsibilities will include monitoring all Equal Employment Opportunity activities and reporting the effectiveness of this Affirmative Action Program, as required by Federal, State and Local agencies. The City Manager of the City of Maplewood will receive and review reports on the progress of the program. If any employee or ap plicant for employment believes he /she has been discriminated against, please contact Gail J. Blackstone, 1830 East County Road 6, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109, or call (612) 770 -45210 is ael A. McGuire., City Manager TwL l9 /989 Date � WM III, ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM The Ci Manager has the overall responsibility for establishment and i mplementation of the City's Equal Employment Opportunity Policy. The day -to -day responsibilities for the implementation of the City' Policy are delegated to the Staff Services Coordinator, who, as Equal . Employment d PP Opp ortunity/ Affirmative Action Coordinator, has the full s upport of top management, The Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator shall monitor all empl oyment .related activity to ensure that the City's Eq ual Employment 0 Affirmative Action policies are being P y ment PP ortunit y� carried out. The Equal Employment Opportunity Coordinator is responsible for. 1. The coordination of equal opportunity employment and affirmative action activities. 2. The dissemination of all policy information as outlined in Section Ili of this Affirmative Action Plan. 3. The conducting of all studies, surveys and job classifications which might be required in accordance with EEO /AA policies. 4. The development of g uidelines in the employment process that are required in accordance with EEO /AA policies. 5 g Serv as liaison between p rotected class groups and the City of Maplewood. and implementing the auditin 6. Designing ,P 9 g and recording systems that measure the Affirmative Action Program and is responsible for the preparation of all reports that are required. 7. Monitoring changes in Federal and State law and updating the City of Maplewood's Affirmative Action Plan to comply with changes. 8. The interpretation of the Affirmative Action Program to all employees, minority, handicapped, women's organizations, and other interested community and civic groups. 9. Maintaining, monitoring and measuring the City's progress toward meeting its affirmative action goals . 10. Providing information to employees or applicants alleging discrimination of their rights under provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of' 1972 and the Minnesota Human Rights Act; of legal options for registering a complaint; and investigation of all such complaints. 11. Receiving, investigating and attempting to resolve all Equal Employment Opportunity and /or Affirmative Action complaints. - 3 - 12 . Providing information to managers and supervisors so that they understand it is their responsibility to take action to prevent the harassment of protected class employees and applicants for employment. 13. Informing p rov i d i -n and applicable training for management and 9, Oepartment heads regarding developments . i n the area of Equal .Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action. 140 Ensu rin g p that department heads have the authority to discipline employees found to be deliberately harassing minorities, handicapped, and women employees, . or displaying conduct inconsistent with the provisions and intent of the Affirmative Action Program . -4- IV. DISSEMINATION OF POLICY A. INTERNAL DISSEMINATION 1. All department and division heads will be given a copy of the Affirmative Action Plan. All employees will receive a co y of the policy statement and have access to the P Affirmative Action Plan. This policy will be made availa ble to all. employees. - r 2. 1he designated Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Coordinator w i l l instruct, inform, and advise all department heads of the responsibilities of employers in promoting and effectuating the policy of nondiscrimination. The Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Coordinator shall have the authority and responsibility to monitor, audit, and review all books and. records of the City and departments of the City to ensure compliance in carrying out the duties and responsibilities required by the City Affirmative Action Plan. 3. Notices will be posted informing all employees and applicants of the policy statement and that access to the Affirmative Action Plan is available through the designated Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Coordinator. 4. The EEO /AA Coordinator will specifically review the EEO /AA policies with minority, female, and disabled employees and applicants upon request. B. EXTERNAL DISSEMINATION 11 The EEO /AA Coordinator will file copies of the Affirmative Action declaration with the State of Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Efforts shall be made to communicate this policy to local community agencies, schools, and community leaders. 2. The City' Finance Director shall distribute the Affirmative Action Policy to vendors and contractors who deal with the City on a regular basis and shall encourage them to follow similar practices. 3. The City will advertise available positions in a manner determined by the City to be most appropriate to reach.local minority, handicapped, and female residents. 4. The EEO /AA Coordinator will be available to discuss the City's Affirmative Action Program and nondiscrimination p olicy olic with any interested communities or civic groups within the City of Maplewood. 5. The City shall make readily available to minorities, handicapped persons, women, and protected class groups the current listing of job opportunities in the City offices. -5- V. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART zzz 151' >; . uGGGm u 0 ' F .j uw N N z zu UO v —W =W zzo -& - aL z z W (A co cx co3 W0- 0- !- t- <0-1-< z W Z- Z Z W= Z z V -wiv) r- � i N - - W t,7 J Al" _> O «. J :o JW W W -+ at �H Jo R::4c <u u� Z Vf �- N = ~ x < J a H o F N u V! W W _ OC J Wu W� NVtN r--z 4K w 4A uZ0 !■Z-�< r J uO — Z► -U. A. SCAO J JJWu■ - <mWu «�•- •uW�+ -V�NW ~ O O�JWOJ <� Q ' 3 V � W J Z � � v a. W �..'= 30- vi 04 uZ W Q � O 11-4 _ W Z < < V O i z J 0- W a- a < � W M � r V Z Z"i U.y W6 W Z .J o- z U' z qKw— �u0ZSz► �[�Z -Z .... QQ U-D < <ZWt at0 LAJ Oc 4A=o ui Z z 8 Wi u zzz 151' >; . uGGGm u W W -_ < < •a ^• Ml aL z z W (A co cx co3 W0- 0- !- t- <0-1-< z W Z- Z Z W= Z V -wiv) r- � i N - - W N O G N 9;; •+ N OK W at u �H X W in Vf< iOf � JWW uJ -- < u u orac ww $ , _ w g J >W °W a = u�nv via CORK F 4RCE AVAILABILITYs AND UTILI ZATION UNDERUTILIZATIQN ANALYSIS ' an Availability Analysis, and a i conducts a. Work Force is, minorities The C Analys to determine whether min ti 1 i zati on /Underut� 1 zat� on Anal 'thin the City U erutilized in any fob group and/or women are being and s wi problem s enable a the City ty to identify P nd -its operations. The result a p •es of action, develop goals, str ategies , areas, determine priorit� remedies, and measures of implementation* , WORK FORCE ANALYSIS • annual 1 Minority and /or force analysis report is prepared y contains A work fo y d� The work force analysis conta� tested coup status is m the lowest pro identified. within each department aob titles and wage rates w , ranked from a total . incumbents • t aid; for each fob title, th paid to the highest p listed by race and sex; and total incumbents listed by the total males and the total females. Job GROUPS• • analysis to determine the availabili for both minorities a are used in the availability y defined as JQb groups and females. Job groups are within the Ci is p laced in and each fob title w y P listed in this section, a job g rou for availability and utilization analysis. sus. These fob groups P • onl They have no meani for any are for affirmative action purposes y other purpose. AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS ' reties and total women for • data was developed for total minorities Availability a p rovided by the Minnesota h job rou using stati sti cal dat p s the eac 9 P • n • - This statistical cal data meet Department of Jobs and Training. al Regulations, 41 • p • s specified f i ed i n the Code of Feder g , minimum requirement P Paul Metropolitan Statistical and includes Minneapolis /St. Pa CFR 60 2.11, Labor Department provided and Ramsey County. The Federal L p the 1980 Area a y and the United States, based on statistical data for Minnesota census, which was also used. • n there are fewer mi norities or ut�l�zation will be declared when ed based Under than would reasonably be expect women in a articular fob group t P :upon their availability. • 'lization is determined annually for each job group within the Underut� City, • in an job group does not imply or declaration of underut�l�zation y The . admit any form of discrimination. _ 7 - JOB GROUP IDENTIFICATION Administrators: Occupations a. Officials and A in which employees set P road policies, exercise overall responsibility for execution of b these policies, or direct individual departments or sp ecial p hases o g f the. agency 's o P eraU p ns. (Middle managers include persons who .y plan, organize,, ani ze, staff, direct, and /or control activities at the - departmental or operational level.) rofessionals echnicians: Professionals are occupations which b. P lT require specialized al i zed and theoretical cal knowl edge which is usually 16 - acquired F ex through college training or throug h work experience and other training which provides comparable knowledge. Technicians are occupations which require a combination of basic scientific or technical knowledge and manual skill which can be obtained through specialized post-secondary school education or through equivalent P on -th -e -job training. c . Protective Service Workers: Occupations 'in which workers are entrusted with P ubl i c safety, security, and protection from destructive forces. Includes: sergeants, polic e p atrol officers, fire fighters, guards, deputy sheriffs, bailiffs, correctional • g g • officers, cers officers, detectives, marshals, harbor patrol of , g ame and fish wardens, P ark rangers (except maintenance), and kindred workers. d Administrative Support (Including Clerical and Sales): Occupations in which workers are responsible for internal and external communication, recording and retrieval of data and /or formation and other paperwork required in an office. Includes: information, fist stenographers, court bookkeepers, messengers, clerk yp s •, anscribers hearing eporters,, statistical clerks, dispatchers, tr. � • ' • g and computer license cense d i stri butors, payroll clerks, office machine p � P o erators telephone operators, legal assistants, sales workers, P cashiers, toll collectors, and kindred workers. e. Skilled Craft Workers: Occupations in which workers perform jobs � which req sp ecial al manual skill l and a thorough and P d in the work comprehensive knowledge of the processes involve c b training and which �s acquired through on- the -�o g experience or P through apprenticeship or other formal training programs. Includes: mechanics and repairers, electricians, heavy equipment � . operators, stationary engineers, skilled machining occupations, P carpenters, compositors and typesetters, power plant operators, water and sewage treatment plant operators, and kindred workers. Repairers: Includes occupations concerned f. Mechanics and Repair erned with the P adjustment, maintenance, part replacement, and repair of tools, equipment and machines. g_ 90 Service /Maintenance: Occupations 'in which workers perform duties which result in or* contribute to the comfort, convenience, hygi ene, or safety of the general. public; or which contribute to the upkeep and care of buildings, facilities, or grounds of public property. Workers in this group may operate machinery. Includes: chauffeurs, laundry and dry cleaning operatives, truck drivers, .bus drivers, garage laborers, custodial employees, g ardene rs,.and groundskeepers. _g_ vii. GOALS AND TIMETABLES Goals and timetables have been developed for each job group in which underuti 1 i zati on of minorities or females is present, based upon the Work Force, Ava i 1 ab i 1 i ty, Ut i 1 i zat i on /Underut i 1 i zat i on Analysis. A. GOALS It is the City of Ha lewood's intention to make a good faith effort to bring each job group in line with availability rates. The goal is to make a good faith effort to hire qualified minorities and women into those fob groups where underut i l i zat i on exists. Since goals are set based on availability and are only estimates and not rigid quotas, it is conceivable that circumstances may sometimes result in their not being achieved. When this occurs, the EEO /AA Coordinator will document all good faith efforts. B. TIMETABLES The City of Maplewood will analyze projected movement for each job g roup to estimate the time frame in which utilization will be attained. The City of Maplewood will consider expected expansion, contraction, and turnover. - 10 - DEP viosm. ; GENERAL GOVERNMENT DATA Its of 11 /01/88 WORKFORCE ANALYSIS (CURRENT 9Y DEPARTMENT) c CITY OF MAPLEWOOn ADDRESS 1830 E County Road B Maplewood, NN 55109 J09 TITLE(S) WAGE RATE OR SALARY PANGE TOTAL E"PLOYEES TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MALE FEMALE l�RNORItT EMPLOYEES !�1 MALE fE!!ALE AI/ B H IAN A/ PI � H All A/ AN PI Building Maintenance $8.42 - 10.53 /hr. 1 1 Secretary MIS Coordinator $8.88- 11.10 /hr. $2,250/mo. 2 1 2 1 ta Services Coordinator $2,917/mo. 1 1 .. City Manager $5,200 /mo. 1 1 TOTALS 6 3 . � 3 B - Black; _H - H A I /A • imerican IndlanlAlaskan Native; A /PI - Aaian /Pa ciric I31ander. DEPA o. m. v;ir FINAN DATA AS OF 11/01/88 WORKFORCE ANALYSIS (CVPRLNT BY OEPARTM,!:NT) comp"? CITY OF MAPLN00b ADDRESS 1830 E. County Road B .0- ammommomm Maplewood, MN 55109 WAGE RATE OA J0S TITLEt sI SALARY RANGE TOTAL EMPLOYEES MINORITY EMPLOYEES ( • 1 TOTAL 2 TOTAL MALE TOTAL, FEMALE 2 - m — MALE FLr!At,E Accounting Clerk $9.04 - 11.30 /hr. I AII AN A/ PI � � A/ AN Al PI Se cret a ry r $8.88- 11.10 /hr. 1 1 ssi Finance Director $2,529/mo. 1 1 a n c e Director $4,133/mo. 1 1 TOTALS 5 1 4 0 'm nlaCK j n 1� n " O "•- - lmerican Indian /Alaskan Native; A /PI - Aglan /Paciric Islander. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OE�A. 1 v DATA AS Or 11/01/88 I Cr WORKFORCE ANALYSIS ( CURRENT BY DEPARTM NT) toMPu+Y CITY OF MApLEW00D ADDRESS 1830 E. County Road B. Ma pl - 6wood,MN 55109 imerican.Indian /Alaskan Native; A /PI - Aslan /Paciric Islander. WA GE RATE OR TOTAL, E"PLOYEES MINORITY EMPLOYEES ! JOS TITLE(S) SALARY RANGE MALE FEXALS TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MALE FEMALE At/ A/ All A/ S H 0 N AN PI AN FI Secretary $8.88-1 1 1 Associate Planner $ 2 2 . Buildin Ins ector $11,87-14.83/hr. 1 1 I in Official $ 15 . 47-17 . 19 / hr. mmmwwmm� ommuni y uevelopment $3,810 /mo. 1 1 . Director Ono A TOT LS 6 4 2 t • % A _ Black: N - Hispanic; ALAN • imerican.Indian /Alaskan Native; A /PI - Aslan /Paciric Islander. t CITY CLERK DATA As or 11/01/88 WORKFORCE ANALYSIS (CURRENT BY DEPARTMENT) coMru�r ....CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ADDRESS 1830J. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RATE OR TOTAL ErPLOYEES KINORtTY EMPLOYE ES ! *t JOS TITLE(S) SALARY AANCE MALE !r'E'�'AL� TOTAL TOTAL. TOTAL MALE FEMALE All A/ I AI I A/ e N N 8 AN PI AN PI mmmmmummomm .Clerk $7.62- 9.53/hr. 2 mom 2 Receptionist/ B il ling Jerk ` 1 1 1 atary - 11.10 $8.88 hr. . / 1 1 • C lerk $ 3,815/mo. TOTALS 5 . (•) B - Black; H - Hispanic; AI_ • meirican Indian /Alaskan Native; A /PI - A31an /Pacirtc Islander. PARKS AND RECREATION DEt . • DATA AS OF - 11101/88 WORKFORCE ANALYSIS ( CURRENT BY DEPARTMENT) toM�u�Y CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ADDRESS .1830 E. County Road B._ Maplewood, MN 55109 JOS TITLE(S) WAGE RATE 00 SALARY RANGE TOTAL TOTAL EMPLOYEES TOTAL TO TAL MALE FEMALE MINORITY EMPLOYEES ! *1 MALE /'E'!!ALE' A All At I ATI / � H Y � N AN PT AN PI Secretary $8.88- 11-10/hr. 1 1 mom wiftm • Maintenance I $ 9,56-11,95 /hr , -- 1 tural i st $9, 58 -11.98 hr. 1 1 Maintenance II $10..36-12-95/hr. 5 5 ' Program Coordinator $ 12.82.14.24/hr. 1 1 ' Foreman $15.02 16.68/hr. 1 1 ss i stant par s an R ecreation Director $15*82 hr. 1 1 ar s an Recreation Director $3,834/mo. 1 1 TOTALS 12 . 9 3 Black; N NiApanlc; A • imerican Indian /Alaskan Native; A /PI — Asian /Paciric Is)ander. %T RUBL I C WORKS DATA As or 11/01/88 I m I WORKFORCE ANALYSIS (CURRENT BY DEPARTMENT) CoMPUY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AooRess 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 mom WAGE RATE ON TOTAL E"PLOTEES KINORITY EMPLOYEES 1 ..1 JOS TITLE(S) SALARY PANGE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MALE PEMAL E MALL FEMALE IAII A/ N All AI 0 N AN PI d AN PI Clerk Typist $7,62-9.53/hr,. 1 1 ' Maintenance Budding $8.42w10.53/hr. 1 1 Secretar $8.88- 11.10 /hr. 1 1 ' ena nc e I Street Main $9.56 - 11.98 /hr. 1 1 • j9,72e-12j5Zhr. 1 1 Maintenance II (Strt) $10.36- 12.95/hr. 6 6 Engineering Technician $10,38-12,98/hr,, 2 1 1 utilit y II $10.55 - 13.18 /hr. 5 5 Mechanic $1.1.01- 13.77/hr. 1 1 Lead Mechanic $11.37- 14.22/hr. 1 1 nvironmen Health Official $11.57- 14.46/hr. 1 1 Senior , Engineering chni cian $11,57-14.46/hr. 5 5 TOTALS ..•.. - -- Awerican IndianlAlaskan Natives A /PI — Asian /Paciric Blander. MONO • �•• PU6L I C WORKS (PAGE 2 ) DATA As or 11101/88. WORKFORCE ANALYSIS (CURRENT BY DEPARTMENT) toMpu+Y CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AooRess 1830 E. County Road B Mavlewood, MN 55109 WACE RATE OR TOTAL E"PLOYEES MINO RITY EMPLOYEES ( 0 ) . JOS TITLE( S1 SALARY PANGS MALE !'E!!AL! TOTAL. TOTAL TOTAL MALE rLWLE I AII I A/ N AT / A/ AN PI AN !I Foreman $15.02- 16.68/hr. 2 2 P ublic W or k s Coordinator $16.24- 18.05 /hr. 1 1 A ssistant Cit Eng ineer $17.74- 19.71 /hr. 1 1 . Public Works Director $4,130 /mo. 1 1 TOTALS 31 28. • 3 �•� - Black; H - Hispanic; AI/AM • _8 American Indian /Alaskan Native; A /PI - .Aglan /Paciric Blander. T PUBLIC SAFETY DATA As or ..11/01/88. WORKFORCE ANALYSIS (CUPPENT BY DEPARTMENT) coMpu+r CITY OF' MApLEW00D ADDRESS 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 VALE RATE OR TOTAL EMPLOYEES MINORITY EMPLOYEES ( J09 TITLE( S) SALARY RANGE TOTAL TOTAL. MALE TOTAL FEMALE MALE rt At,e AI/ A/ S N All A/ 0 N AN PI AN 'I Clerk Typist $7.62- 9.53/hr. 3 3 . Building Maintenance $8.42- 10.53 /hr. 1 1 Secret a r $8.88. /hr. 1 1 Dispatcher $8,88-11,10/hr 6 2 4 Poli Officers $1,784 28 2 8 1 Dep Fire Marshal $2,701/mo. 1 1 Po lice Se rgeants $ 7 6 1 ' l Fire Marsha $2,999/mo. 1 1 Police Captain $3 535/mo. 2 2 ` afet Director Public S y $4,266/mo. 1 1 TOTALS 51 42. - 9 - - - 1 -- -- - • - - - - - . V I i VW) n vat; n � � 4 aV4W4 %we - imerican Indlan /Alaskan Native; A /PI -. Aalan /Paciric Islander. ______ AVATI AQTi TTVA T7ATTnN /IINnrRIITTI T7ATTnN N * SOURCE OF AVAILABILITY %: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF JOBS' & TRAINING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA JULY 1987 FEMALES MINORITIES UTILIZATION NUMBER % AVAILABILITY NUMBER °y NUMBER UNDER- UTILIZED UTILIZATION AVAILABILITY NUMBER UNDER - UTILIZED JOB GROUP TOTAL NUMBER NUMBER OFFICIALS/ ADMINISTRATORS 18 5 27.8 5 2 8.4 0 0 0 0 293 0 PROFESSIONAL /. LCHNICAL 14 2 14.3 7 46.65 5 0 0 3.25 1 PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS 37 1 2 .7 3 8.4 2 1 2.7 2 4.4 1 OFFICE /CLERICAL 23 21 91. 3_ 18 77.59 0 0 0 .1 3.2 1 SKILLED CRAFT 18 1 0 0 1 3*66 1 0 0 1 3.42 1 MECHA N IC/ REPAIRER 2 0 0 moommomma 0 3.1 0 0 0 0 1.8 0 SERVICE/ MAINTENANCE 4 0 0 1 16.85 1 0 0 0 9962 0 SMALL COMPANY WEIGHTED AVAILABILITY- * SOURCE OF AVAILABILITY %: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF JOBS' & TRAINING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA JULY 1987 P ROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE A CTION Ali I I ._._._._ A summary analysis has been done to determine problem /deficiency areas in the following categories. 10 Work Force Composition .2. Applicant Flow Composition 3, Total Selection Process - 4, Transfer and Promotion Practices Company Facilities and Company Sponsored Activities 5. P � 5. Seniority Practices and Contract Prov isions for Same 7. Apprenticeship Programs 86 company Training Programs 90 work Force Attitude 10. Posters, Application lication Retention, and Subcontractor Notification The following is a listing of the problems and deficiencies which were identified along with corrective actions. o The work force composition is underutilized in several areas. Please refer to the Job Groups listed below. o Position descriptions were found for one (1) position which has a gender specific title (Foreman). This title will be changed in the next collective bargaining agreement* Op posters were not displayed. These o Equal Employment PP posters have been ordered from the EEOC and will be p osted at the public entrances to the buildings. o No other problem areas were identified. A. JOB GROUP: PROFESSIONAL /TECHNICAL rutilization for women and minorities in this job There �s unde but w�11 do not anticipate openings in this job group, b ..group. We P . a art -time select based upon availability. In January, 1989, p P Accountant will become a full -time position* achieve a targeted utilization of five (5) female s The goal �s to a g Achievement of one (1) minority in this job group by 1993. Achie and �t of et will be dependent on turnover and availability this tang P qualified ual i f i ed applicants. The City w i l l recruit q q p rotected group members from external sources. B. JOB GROUP: PROTECTIVE SERVICE WORKERS utilization for minorities and women in this job There �s under group. rou We do not anticipate openings in this job group but will select based upon availability. - 13 - The goal is to achieve a targeted utilization of two (2) women and one (1) minority in this Sob group by 1993, dependent upon turnover and availability. The City will recruit for qualified minorities and women from external sources. C. JOB GROUP: OFFICE/CLFRICAt There is underutilization. for minorities in this job group. We do not anticipate openings in this job group but will select based upon availability. The goal is to achieve a targeted utilization of one (1) minority by 1993. The City will recruit protected group members from external sources. D. JOB GROUP: SKILLED CRAFT There is underuti 1 i zati on for women and minorities in this job group, , We do not anticipate openings in this job group but will select based upon availability. The 9 oal is to achieve a targeted utilization of one (1) woman and one ( 1 ) minority by 1993. Achievement of t h i s target will-be dependent on turnover and availability of qualified applicants. The City will recruit qualified protected group members from external sources. E, JOB GROUP: SERVICE MAINTENANCE There is underutilization for women in this job group. We do not anticipate openings in this job group but will select based upon availability. The goals is to achieve a targeted utilization of one (1) woman by 1993, Achievement of this target will be dependent on turnover and availabilit y of qualified applicants. The City will recruit qualified protected group members from external sources. - 14 - IX. MEASURES TO FACILITATE IMPLEMENTATION OF E UAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY POLICY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS The City of Maplewood intends to facilitate implementation of our Equal Employment Opportunity Policy and Affirmative Action goals through the pursuit of the following personnel policies . . These policies are in place. ace. or w i l l be adapted for the purpose of adhering to the principles oaf Equal Employment Opportunity and the Affirmative Action program. All City written personnel Rol ici es and collective bargaining negotiations w i l l reflect equal employment opportunity principles. A. POSITION DESCRIPTIONS 1. A written position description will exist for all regular, full time positions at the City of Maplewood. 26 Position descriptions will include position title, department, person (or body) accountable to, primary objectives of the position, major areas of accountability, minimum qualifications required to perform the work supervision of others. 3. Position title and minimum q u a l i f i c a t i o n s contained in written descriptions will be used in all recruitment advertising. 4. The minimum qualifications of each position shall be periodically reviewed by the Staff Services Coordinator to determine if all qualifications required are related to actual job performance. B, RECRUITMENT 10 The City of Maplewood will advertise position openings in the appropriate media for its labor market. 2. All job advertisements shall state that the City of Maplewood is an "Equal Opportunity Employer ". 3. All job advertisements shall state the title of the position, a general description of duties, the minimum qualifications, where to apply or obtain an application, and other relevant information. 4. All job advertisements shall indicate the last day of filing of application for the position advertised. - 15 - s will be sent to organizations 5. Job vacancy announcement represent women, the labor market who specifically within minorities, and the handicapped. Conta cts will be ' with these organizations and documentation w i l l maintained be kept on contacts made and their response* f resource a enci es which can aid i n recruitment 6' a listing ° • •� g Department of Human efforts and is suppled by the 1��nnesota Dep • eketonfllefor Rights Contract Compliance Unit, will b p the p urpose of recruitment contacts. C. CITY PERSONNEL POLICIES i nator shall periodically i cal l iew and y rev 1. The Staff Services Coord P . City Personnel Policies so that it is consistent update the y with the Affirmative Action program. The . Personnel Policies ' employee benefits, terms and condit of conditi details employment, employer actions, employee obligations and rights, and privileges of employees. 2. Each department shall be informed of Affirmative Action goals and timetables, and EEOC regulations. personnel 3, To ensure nondiscriminatory olicies and actions, p P • the Staff Services Coordinator will0 all ap tests under standardized a, Administer and uniform conditions and provide for impartial evaluations of test results. b. Declare all job o P portuni ti es and vacancies open to male and female applicants unless any given J ob is proven exclusive for one sex on the basis of bona fide occupational q u a l i f i c a t i o n s set forth in Title VII and subsequent court decisions. • interviews with all employees leaving the C, Conduct exit � nterv� m e , employment* P to determine reasons for leaving e - City Identify and document possible sources of discrimination or underut i l i zat i on . procedures in job rep d. Implement uniform proce lacements, job , s and notices,.position descriptions, and posting Action advertising to conform with Affirmative program. • appropriate selection procedures in screening e. Utilize app p and determining applications and applicant eligibility. on of minority, disabled, and f. Encourage the promote female employees. - 16 - D. SELECTION AND HIRING applications for employment will be reviewed to 1. All app for. that determine i f applicants d meet minimum qualifications position. shall l make a "good faith" effort to meet its • 2. The City � � consideration to affi rrnative action goals by giving maxim those protected class candidates who possess minimum qualifications for City positions. 3. No applicant shall be prohibited from applying for a City position because of past criminal conviction. E, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ar p eriods for entry and promotional positions Y . All probationary P em . shall be uniformly applied. No protected cl ass employee y ee shall be subject P ub 'ect to a probationary period different in length from any other employee. 2. All performance evaluations will be based on actual. performance on the job. A 3. Included in performance evaluations for Department Heads and Supervisors will be an appraisal o Scrpe f their performance in regards to Affirmative Action principles. 1 s shall be in writing and shall be 4, Performance appraisa e reviewed with employees and made part of t heir permanent personnel record. F, COMPENSATION ion schedules for City employees s 1. All compensation hall. adhere to State and Federal laws and shall not discriminate upon of race sex, color, religion, national origin, the bass � veteran status, handicap, disability, age, marital status, and to public • P status with re political of f i 1 i at i on , or st a g assistance. fit schedules shall be equal for Z, �I1 fringe benefit members of both sexes and shall not discriminate against any employed member of a protected class. G. TERMINATION'- DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES • s shall not discriminate against any � . Disciplinary pl � nary procedure , on the basis of race, sex, color, religion, employee national origin, handicap, disability, age, marital status, veteran status, political affiliation, or status with regard to public assistance. - 17 - The internal grievance procedures shall exist through the 2 9 d will be equivalent. personnel policies or union contract an q employees have the benefit of disciplinary 3, Dismissed h ave measures as outl in the Personnel Policies. They the pp o ortunity to have their dismissal reviewed by the `� Staff Services Coordinator and the City Manager to determine g • if discrimination occurred, and to review the poss bl e remedies. H. TRAINING 1, All employees shall be informed of career opportunities and encouraged .to participate in applicable c areer related professional development. 2. Access to applicable training or career development is open to all employees and restrictions will not be made based on p race, color, creed, religion, national on gin , sex, disability, age, e marital status, or status with regard to public assistance* I. TRANSFER AND PROMOTION 1, All job openings shall be posted in City facilities. 2. Career advancement through transfer and promotion will be encouraged for qualified employees. Protected class employees who have improved their job skills and job • and compete potential shall be encouraged to apply for p promotion. J. DOCUMENTATION 1, The Staff Services Coordinator shall keep a written record of the efforts to achieve Affirmative Action goals as required by Section X, monitoring and auditing of this Affirmation Action Plan. 2. The Staff Services Coordinator will review and record "good faith" efforts to reach the goals and timetables according to this Affirmative Action Plan. K, COMPLAINT PROCEDURE 11 The.Cit y will receive, investigate, and attempt to resolve internal and external charges of alleged violations of its obligation under government regulations. 2, Posters will be displayed that advise complaintants of their rights to courses of action and the appropriate government agencies to contact. - 18 3. Complaints and actions to resolve them will be kept confidential* 4. No individual will be intimidated, threatened, discriminated .a 9 ai nst, or coerced by the City for part i ci pat i ng in any or all phases of the complaint process is who believe the City has violated ated its obligations S. Applicants Y ; . under overrment regulations may, file complaints either with City, the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, hts or the the Ci g , Department of Labor. The Staff Services Coordinator should be contacted to file with the city. 6. 'Employees who believe the City has violated its obligation under overnment regulations may file compl nts either with the City, the Minnesota Department of Human Rig , 9 Rights, or the Department of Labor. Employees may bring their concerns to their supervisor and /or Staff Services Coordinator. oordinator. Employees o y ees ray file written complaints with the Department of p Labor. - 19 - X. INTERNAL AUDIT OF REPORTING SYSTEM The Staff Services Coordinator is responsible for developing and ma i nta i n i n g an internal auditing and reporting system to monitor the y Cit s success in achieving Affirmative Action goals and principles. summary 9 data relating to the personnel process should be maintained and periodically dated. Appropriate records shall be those most useful in P y u P Department of preparing required compliance reports submitted to p Human Rights. As RECRUITMENT AREAS Data shall be maintained on media sources used to cover recruitment areas and all other recruitment methods for each City job vacancy. 6. APPLICANT FLOW DATA Data shall be maintained that indicates, by job classification: 1. Job Group Identification 2. Selection Procedures 3. The Total Number of Applicants Interviewed 4. Those Offered Positions 5. New Hires C. APPLICANT REFERRALS A file of all interested applicants shall be maintained in compliance with the Minnesota regulations related to Government Records Retention Schedule. This file shall be used to notify interested applicants when vacancies occur for which they would be qualified. D. PROMOTIONS Data shall be maintained b job classifications that indicates Da y those employees who are promoted and in which fob group(s) this movement has occurred. E. TRANSFERS be maintained ned re ardi n transfers and indicating, by Data shall regarding job classification, those employees who are transferred and in which fob group(s) this movement has occurred. - 20 - F. TERMINATIONS Data shall be maintained on all terminations by job classification and job group identification. Thi data shal 1 include the reasons a for termination* Records on exit interviews sh all be maint ined. G. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS r Documentation of all disciplinary actions shall be maintained. Docun�en . p This shall include actions taken. and the reasons for such action . H. DOCUMENTATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS Documentation shall be maintained on good faith efforts to reach the City's Affirmative Action goals in the recruitment, selection, and employment of protected class persons. I . REPORTING r emi - annual compliance ian required by �ce re orts will be conducted as requ S p P the Minnesota IDe►parrtment of Human Rights The records w . �11 be maintained on file. OR 21 - XI. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS A. DISABLED INDIVIDUALS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CLAUSE The City of Maplewood shall not discriminate against any employee P or applicant for empl oyment because of physical or mental • which ch the employee or d, sat�1 l i ty in regard to any r position on for w applicant icant for employment I s qualified. The City of Maplewood PP . agr too take: affirmative action to employ, advance in employment, and otherwise treat qualified disabled individuals without discrimination, fused .upon their physical or mental disabilit Y in all employment practices such. as the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The City of Maplewood agrees to comply with the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the 14i nnesota human Rights Act. The City of Maplewood agrees to P ost in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices in a form to be prescribed by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Such notices shall state the City of Maplewood's obligation under the law to take affirmative action to employ,and advance in employment qualified disabled employees and applicants for employment, and the rights of applicants and employees. The City of Maplewood shall notify each labor union, or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract understanding, that the - g 9 g City is bound by the terms of Minnesota Statutes, Section 363.073 of the Minnesota liuman Rights Act and is committed to take affirmative action to employ, and advance in employment, p hysically sically and mentally disabled individuals. B. SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW The City of Maplewood will review all physical and mental job requirements to the extent that these requirements tend to screen out ualified disabled individuals at the time positions become available. It will be determined whether t hese requirements uirements are q job related, and consistent with business necessity and the safe performance of job. C. PRE - EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAMS The City of Maplewood may require a comprehensive medical exam rior to employment, The results of such an examination will not be used to screen out qualified disabled individuals. Information obtained in response to such inquiries or examination shall be _ 22 _ kept confidential except that (a) supervisors and managers may be p � k or duties of disabled informed regarding restric ons of the work individuals and regarding accommodations, (b) first aid and safety may be informed where and to the extent appropriate, if personnel y � the condition might require emergency treatment, an d (c) officials, employees, representatives, or agents of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights or local human rights agencies investigating com' pl i aEnce with the act or local human rights ordinances shall be informed if they request such information. D. E. F. ACCOMMODATIONS TO PHYSICAL AND KEWAL LIMITATIONS OF EMPLOYEES The City of Maplewood shall make a reasonable accommodation to the p hysical sical and mental limitations of an employee or applicant unless such an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the conduct of the business. COMPENSATION In offering employment or promotions to disabled individuals, the City of Maplewood shall not reduce the amount of compensation offered because of any disability income, pension, or other benefit the applicant or employee receives from another source. OUTREACH, POSITIVE RECRUITMENT, AND EXTERNAL DISSEMINATION OF POLI The City of Maplewood shall review employment practices to determine whether the personnel programs provide the required affirmation action for employment and advancement of qualified disabled individuals. Based upon the findings of such review, the City of Maplewood shall undertake appropriate outreach and positive recruitment activities,, such as those listed below. 1. Develop internal communication of obligation to engage in affirmative action efforts to employ qualified disabled individuals in such a manner as to foster understanding, acceptance, and support among executive, management, supervisory, and all other employees; and to encourage such persons to take the necessary action to aid the City of Maplewood in meeting t h i s obligation, 2. Develop reasonable internal procedures to ensure that the obligation to engage in affirmative action to employ and promote qualified disabled individuals is being fully implemented. 3. Periodically inform all employees and prospective employees of the commitment to engage in affirmative action to increase employment opportunities for qualified disabled individuals. - 23 - 4. Establish meaningful contacts with appropriate . social service agencies, organizations of and for disabled individuals, vocational rehabilitation agencies or facilities for such purposes as advice, technical assistance, and referral to potential employees. 5. Review employment records to determine the availability of . promotable and transferable qualified known disabled Individuals presently employed, and to determine whether their present and potential skills are being fully u t i l i z e d or developed. _24_ ■ v XII. INTERNAL DISSEMINATION OF POLICY • ram is ineffective without adequate Realizing that an outreach prog • support . from su ervisor and management personnel and other internal suppor P y employees persons in the es who may have had limited contact with disabled order to ensure seater employee cooperation and • pasta In 9 this s of � c ar ici ation, the City of Maplewood shall disseminate policy P P internal as fol 1 ows include cl ude i t i n the p ersonnel policy ianual ; 1. to discuss policy meetings with employees, upon request, 2, schedule g p and explain individual employee responsibilities; • thoroughly in both 3, discuss the policy thorn g y e orientation and P management training programs 4. meet with union officials to inform them of the City of eta P 1 ewood' s policy, and request their cooperation* • es in all union 5. include nondiscrimination clauses agreements, and 9 review all contractual provisions to ensure they are nondiscriminatory; 5. include articles on accomplishments of disabled workers in City publications; 70 post the pol on Cit bulletin boards, including a statement Ci emp and applicants are protected fr om coerci • P Intimidation, Interference, or discrimination for filing a comp laint or assisting in an investigation under the Minnesota Human Rights Act; and 8, when employees are featured in employee handbooks or similar publications for employees, include disabled employees. - 25 - XIII. RESPONSIBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION • Services Coordinator, has been designated Gail J. Blackstone, Staff s _ S � 'vibes. • City of Ma 1 ewood s affirmative action act d � rector of the C y P internal and external communications Her identity stall appear on all inter • • wood's Affirmative Action Program. Gail 1 J . regarding Cit of Maple and staff to been given necessary top management support a Blackstone has b 9 . the following owin implementation ement ati on of this program, including g manage the P _ activities: cents affirmative ac ion programs, and 10 Develop pol i cY statements, 1 �d i n regular internal and external communication techniques, includ re 9 • managers, supervisors, sors, and employees to be discussions with local r g � � P d. In certa of Ma lewood s policies are being followed* certain the City P a � supervisors ervisors shall be advised that. . P (a) their work performance is being evaluated on the basi of- their affirmative action efforts and results, as well as other criteria; and of M is obligated to (b) t he city of prevent harassment p employees placed 1 aced through affirmative action effo . • n with line management and 2. Identify problem areas in con3unctio known disabled bl ed imp Y l o ees in the implementation of the Affirmative � Action Plan, and develop solutions. • 3. Design and i mplem ent audit and reporting systems that will: (a) measure effe of the City of Mapl ewood' s plan; (b) indicate need for remedial action; • objectives have been attained, (c) determine the degree to which obi employees have had the detemi a ether known disabled 0 (d) City-sponsored ortunity to participate in all • PP recreational, and social activities, educational, training, an 'nnesota at the City is in compliance with the M� (e) ensure that Y Human Rights Act. 4. Serve as liaison between the City of Maplewood and the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. • between the City 5. Serve as liaison betty y of Maplewood and organizations r disabled persons, and arrange for the active . of and for P community service involvement b City representatives in the y � y of local organizations of and for the disabled. programs . • latest developments in the _entire 6. -Kee management informed of the P of f i rmat i ve . action area* 26 _ XIV, DEVELOPMENT AND EXECUTION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS The Affirmative Action Plan for the City of Maplewood shall be developed and executed as follows: 19 Job qualification requirements reviewed shall be made available to all members of management. involved in the recruitment, screening, selection, and promotion process 2, The City of Maplewood shall evaluate the total selection process , including training and promotion, to ensure freedom from stereotyping n disabled persons in a manner which limits the i t yA 9 p access to all fobs for which they are qualified. 3-o All ersonnel involved in the recruitment, screening, sel ect i. on , P promotion, disciplinary, and related processes shall b e carefully selected and trained to ensure that the commitments in its affirmation action program are implemented. 4. Disabled employees shall be made available for participation in career days, youth motivation programs and related activities in their communities. 5. An effort shall be made to participate in work study programs with r e h a b i l i t a t i o n facilities and schools which specialize in training and educating disabled individuals. . 6. The City of Maplewood shall use available resources to continue or establish on-the-job training programs* Michael A. McGuire, City Manager G a i l J. V ckstone, Staff Services Coordinator Date Lj'U-1 5 1 4 S DateC) _ 27