Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989 07-06 & 07-10 City Council Packet
AGEMA MAPLEWWD CITY COUMCIL 4:30 P.M., Thursda Jul 6, 1989 and 6:30 P*Mo, Monda Jul 10, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Buildin Meetin No. 89 - 16 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES D o APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims 2. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation 3. Chan of Mana - Red Lobster 4. Conditional use Permit Renewal - Crestview Forest PUD 5. Final Plat - Hazelwood Hei Fe AWARD OF BIDS 1. Front End Loader 2. Front-Mounted Rotar Mowers Go UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. 1990 - 1994 CIP (4 Votes) 2. Geranium-Ferndale Assessment Appeals Pro 87-20 3. Revocation of Permit: Hause 4* Variance Versus Variation 5. Off-Street Parkin Ordinance - Code Amendment - (2nd Readin t Votes) 6. Gof f Homes a* Plan Amendment (4 Votes) be Rezonin (4 Votes) 7. Cond3tional Use Permit: Count Road D (Coins) 8. Plannin Commis s ion Survey—. He NEW BUSINESS 1. Bituminous Overla - Project 89-14 2. Beam Avenue Si - Pro 89-15 3. Mana Salar Adjustment 4. Plastic Ordinance 5. Preliminar Plat Revision ~ C Little Addition 6. Cotta of Maplewood Financin Chan I. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 20 30 4e 50 60 7* 80 90 100 Jo ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1 Code Review - R-3 District A 30 4 * 50 K* ADJOURNMENT OF JULY 6.9 1989 MEETING Lo RECONVENE: CALL JULY 10* 1989 MEETING TO ORDER M. ROLL CALL NA PRESENTATIONS 1. Decision Resources N* PUBLIC HEARINGS lo 7:00 P. M• - Code Amendment - conditional Use Permits 0• VISITOR PRESENTATIONS PIS ADJOURNMENT OF JULY 109 1989 MEETING AGENDA REPORT TO : City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE. June 30, 1989 Agenda Number E -1 F Action by Counei:L : Endorsed, Modified Rej ected Date It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 667,985.81 $ 195,079.60 $ 863,065.41 PAYROLL: $ 173,600.39 $ 33,825.66 $ 207,426.05 $1,070,491.46 Checks #4456 - #4530 Dated 06 -15 -89 thru 06 -30 -89 Checks #1354 - #1486 Dated 07 -06 -89 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF: kaz VOUCHREG r - j. - -- G 6-/ 294 8 9- 1 - 5 - -.-4,6- - __ __ CITY OF MAPLE:WOOD _ __ _ _ - - ------ - - . -• -- �1 i� #���1E �tl RE-{;3-Si-� _ PAGE 2; F OR PERIOD 06 3 °. S 7 t CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM i 44 15! NUMBER NUMBER s DATE NAME DE S CR IPTI O N ITEM CHECK "s' , r fi -- --�— 6� 140 4 04.. X _ : 06;115/8 - CLFR ... .: _. K- T IC T {. NTY DRIV AMO AMOUNT ! ` .._. .. •. ..... S ,. .. ..... LI 11 L1 7T -` " �lYT L7�Zr' ��� 4458 231500 06/15/8' EDEN SYSTEMS INC. EQUIPMENT OFFICE i 3i �'4� c 240.00 15 t4 ... : .. , E QUIPMENT OTICE'; .3z 00 1 e 45' n,14 — ° --��. �r�{� ---� -I - -�-A• r� � -g -N -T �� *� 17 ! 18� SURCHARGE TAY PDL • . 0� "' 36 36,432.00 19t ... ^�3 5--�- - Pict l- 5 l s�"- -N-.- S-. -{�- ■ . 23 # ..: — IT3 - _ Y 2 2117 1, n ': _ U TILITIE S - UTILITIES ,, ?6 1 - t 23' T3- LIT -1 F S . - izs UTILITIES 113 so r t24! UTILITIES . 14 . r 1251 26 3 -� 32; 1 27 : UTILITIES 1 94 .78 : :26 UTILITIES 8 1 34; - U . T; L-I fi8 - 8 .35; 36 3' 3� UTILiTTIES 184.16 `3i UTILITIES ^ ,_. : 86 --.-7 9 4� ;r 3 UTILITI E S .. . UTILITIES - 7Z . 48 ;4 ' y T 1 15. 2 ; 42i 43' UTILITIES 1 ''" ` � 45 :3u n UTILITIES -- 75,.: r .. :. ' , J• S4 145: 4,i . r 4461 541400 R s ;. - -- -- 06/15189 MINN. STATE TREASURER -- -- OR V MOT EH.LIC. _-- —_ : 48 { 4p; ... 8, 282 - 50 8 282 5 1 -44-62 541 -4s3.4 4° -- 064 - .-5 x-5-9 M-I-N N-.=-S T�4 ' - ''R F-l� eft f R-- _STAGE - DR- I -VERS; .. f 4463 60900 i a2 06/16l89 NATIONAL YOUTH SPORTS COACHES MEMBERSHIP 15 . - } 4464: 630050 06/16!89 N.S.P. 33 0.00 -- _ '- 0 6: ;� r444 > ` UTILITIE 229,.65 UTILITIES s . 53 146 fi r: - -- - - - UT� L I T T E S - -- - - _- _ - _S - �..�._ ? 63. -J ; .r 48 UTILITIES ■ J !st _ _____ UTILITIES 543 �: 5 ;E2 . 163; UTILITIES 8 J UTILITIES 6.31 OFF, ` iifl UTILITIF `' 788.:::�� ,ss UTILITIES 179.87 - 660225 = 06/16/89 NO. ST. PAUL WELDING CONTRACT PYM. - 4465 6 S • 4. 65 .43 1 5; . , `� 44 .Z 140 00 --_ -_ __.�-_-_.___. - -----. __ '.-_-_-_-'_---._"--._------------.-_------_-_-._'-_---_-.-".__"-.-._.."--".._---'-__-.'-----•--"----......._-'----'___ -.----------------.-----------._._"._---- ------ - 5. IV�UCHREG 1: ,.:;:'.- .. . R.EFUND _._WAG ;:, 1481 : a .-0 a t50 as '' ;: 5 : 4s 5U s r 4ITY GF MAPLEf��OD .. PAGE `' `' r --V { !1; , . ..-vit/--� � f-8-9-----1-5 : -46---___ .. .. -" : .. . V 3t:1 C 4�f E f !'G H E C �'•:- ,REG 1S T E R'------ - _----- --"._ --. - 1.1.- 1 ' ��'' 44:►5 : - .. ., "` a6/ZZ/39 MINN. STATE TREASIlRER ". .. . .1. - 1. ,1. :, _ FOR PLR'IOD �N . .. :... ,. . , . 43 ... _ _ .i.. z, �: 1.. .' ."'°� 0 _r ( n. ,_ �... _ . _. t. r .. k .... ... .. ....,.. ... .. .. .... ... > r.. .:,.. .:.. ... .... ... ........ ... b f... :., .. b w __ � s .. ., ''1:1 � . .,. .. ': .. :. .. .. .:: .. ,.. -:. �., .. e „ ,... -: .. .:, .e:.. .... ., :,. , ..,. .F. _. ...... ... .. ,. .. ... .... .::-.. , ., .. ., .., , .... .. ... , .. :.r .... ., . .. .. -. .... ...... .... .. .. .. ... ..... ...... ..... ...,. , ;. ... ... .. ... 3r . i �N ;t,:- t- • v 1..;,.. .tom. tP: , 'i x , roY: ... =' .. . ., r "... :. ..... :. :. 4 . ,t . . ; - 4 �:., --� �Z-Z 2-D(}- , m-,' 4#S /- Z �$-5�-- -1 i - y r M P' - - i F C� --� t S - .r = -- - 5 $t r�i .�W�"" �`. X62 14� S 471. ��+�, ;' CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHEuK ;5 T:: 51 ; , •o NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME n DE�Cfi I�'T ION AMOUNT AMOUNT j 7 1 '-': •' ;S, 7 :. _ - --- .. 1. 4466 . - -..; 0..1700 , _. - _ a6/16/S9 ::AMOCO £1IL CG.I.1.1. - ... ' ,: FUE:L..4IL : 6 0 a 66 :` to a . g -. r- . . . ... .. . .': :, .. .. 06/Ga/3'� MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS i_IC. 798.50 : 79 .50 ', - � 1, ir I, s : . : .: ,9 0 4 O 0------0.6-1-1-6-f -84 --DE F- T . -$-E--�i �4 fi H h l;rL-;-RES GU R J`E-C C N �Y-1} R �1�E { S- -L_�C : •� 4 6 t ; ► 3" 'w 3 s i 12. 1 3' '101 _.. . ,.. _ -... . :. . , .. .... . , t . 'r, ., . •347.40 14i 75i _. 5. ,. : , , L 449 Z - �14{ DNR LICE N3E - " ' zt1` 4474 541440 06 / I c�IS9 M I NlV . STATE TREASURER STATE DRI VERS L"I C . S72 •00 ST2 .00 (}b' :1� ;. �# 471 5 1 440 r ad ! 1ld9 MINN .: STA.TE ':TREASt1Rl=Ft MuTOFt VEH L I:C . _ �3w�� .,'.:�a 6 FS3? .50 171 tai j1t 15 . .' -4 -7-2------s*f-44)30 06-/-1'.Q-/-eP:�--- 'M-I-N"N-.-- S-TATE_ -TINEA-SUR-ER---- --& A-T-E-DR-F-V--L-f G -F E�E-S _ ?S 1 :-5-^ ^9 _ �-1- i-ae ----sol - - 21! . ,161 : 18` 4475 '541400 06 / 19/d9 MINN . STATE TREASURER Mt�TGh VEH LIG � �.E� � , 451 . 16 9 , 053 . i c� - 22; ; , . . . ... .. ;,s: 1 . :. :. _ , :. 4474 6x0'00 -- _� .: COACHES SUBS :ME MI�Efr _ 46fZ4/9 : NATIQNAL _YOUTE4 , SPf}RTS GGA . .: : _. .�15.�Jt3 3 S.Ot . 1 251 zs; ,. z7, fix., 1 , z o.. . - . .. , ,; . , _. .... . . . .. .. ., . ' 28i .21: ,� �� T }� f / ,An 7' ice+ �r A � T p�/� � �� � h� !,' A nr� /- �•►p� -�• �+-�• 1= i d E1 4�v-----0�3-145er---0&i-Z-048---.,AaU7tR-.I-LUL?^--A- -l'NG-`f"� 'Yt�1-G � 1Kf 1-,'1)�--D--"GGN-S--C-r 1`•R 4_ ��_�_ I`.�; Ts�'T_�" j , + 7"� •'*-`� G91 " 1221 : 4476 541404 0;/ZO/S9 MI N!V . STATE TREASURER MO1•UR VEH LIC FEES 1301 iat, . !241 I 1'.y .2J1.: :;.:lq ... . 44T7 541400 _, . . : '°} re 061 /..0/d � . MINN ..:STATE : TREA�t1RR ____ _ 1. . ......STATE -DRIV t..I.C'..�EIF_,., '. . - .., . ` s ':.: ; . ..::.......:7-aLr'.•'.SV-7aZ"..54`�. ::;:'.34i 1331 +.r. *. r 1 201- ..: .. .:. _ .9.9 ,. : .: .::-: _ . .. : .. _ :, . . d. .:. . >:....., , >: . . '.' ` 35' I- 361 v _i' z i , . .. h 6 T h -�• n t ,� � ,I. � A, -Te ---� '+.c a-�S'a-irlr--06 -f-zo-%�-9- G --t-M-A7S - . -, -O-ST-A-GE - r- D: ^- 0 ' 1 S"���� ; 137, 25j , I '29j 4479 541400 06 /Z 1 /89 MINN . STATE TREASl1RER MOTOR VEH LIC FLF_S . 7, 7 . .75 7, 79$ .75 ;381 ias: 1301 '_ Y,. I 4 ' i' .::, 311 , .:. _„ _ 44.8 a 5 414.00 - .._ _ . - ,, .. . :. :.... .... .. .: ; :> 06/..1:/S. M INN . STATE >.TREASURER; :>. _.: - . _. TATE. DRI LIC FEES .. _ 17_..50 - ...._,,:_ _. :17.0 91 '''4z 1 i i 2 _,:;., �!: i. 1. _ ,.. ,. _: . _.: _ . _. ...., . :.: _. ^:�`C' 43i d4j .' 13..I: , :':.; . _. . ;d �" s71 is:.:' '::.'. .. .::-. �-.'.�' l] .LZ_i�C1tLL2'� . .. .. L� mak! P• ll �i_�1i-i��-U-.� :.. .. ?- 'i' .. . �c��}-�t A - M- ': ` :. � . �•T�f? � `��" � e;i 1 5; . , `� 44 .Z 140 00 46/2Z/�9 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC. 14 .50 144.50 X47; . . . , 36' 1 _. ,...... ,. ... , ....... at ..: _ 1 _ 44$3 I 4, :. ... , . . $ 1..50 i. r Z! 9 ZtlERt�HEE MAR C i4C:E T '. a6/Z d _ ,... ,.. . ,.:;:'.- .. . R.EFUND _._WAG ;:, 1481 : a .-0 a t50 as '' ;: 5 : 4s 5U s r r _% 38t1. .- �. .. .-. _ . _._ . .. _.. .._I,J _. .: ... ..,. . . .... 'r ... 3 , , t /y 1 1F.'� _4 Yl��4l -` "".�:/Ei f f: -f f'f S t�ftiF .�T�Y t'fl Fiittr�'1t -�• h r 1 E- S 1-E��S`Y [• �.7 _ ry _� • _�T�1"a` 1 ' ��'' 44:►5 : - 541404 a6/ZZ/39 MINN. STATE TREASIlRER ". .. . MOTOR VEH LIC. 6,630.54 ::.. :` 6:63.34 s4 I;.", ss ' . .. :... ,. . , . 43 ... _ _ .i.. .... - .. ... ... ,. .... .. .. .. .... ..,. ...., ., ..o -,,:i. . .,.. .. .. .,yt: Acv>.. .. . r. 4/., .. .. .. .... ,::. : .: .. r 3 :, :.ti: ,fir _..a�.'h.-?1. tirlb .. x. .. .. .. :... .... .::. ..., .. ... , ,. ... ....x �., ..., Y 'c8. .. , ,: .> .. .. .. .,. ,. ... , ::., ... .. .. . ... ... .,. .. ,r,. .. ., - is ..:.,•s :,. �$:S 1.f, t ..� ��i _ .._ _ , : r ,.,t .,, 63.. �. E Y E W A:G D E UCTION ,. ' U R K M s L C s ... ,, , .: _ i �5 456 1 ... 11 , 0 _r ( n. ,_ �... _ . _. t. r .. k .... ... .. ....,.. ... .. .. .... ... > r.. .:,.. .:.. ... .... ... ........ ... b f... :., .. b w __ � s >. ,:� .. .... .... .. ... .. _ ... ,. - ,. ... ... s .. .. a :.. � . .,. .. ': .. :. .. .. .:: .. ,.. -:. �., .. e „ ,... -: .. .:, .e:.. .... ., :,. , ..,. .F. _. ...... ... .. ,. .. ... .... .::-.. , ., .. ., .., , .... .. ... , .. :.r .... ., . .. .. -. .... ...... .... .. .. .. ... ..... ...... ..... ...,. , ;. ... ... .. ... 7 s. t<,, .. .. .. r:. ...� -. ... .. �N ;t,:- t- • v 1..;,.. .tom. tP: , 'i x , roY: ... =' .. . ., r "... :. ..... :. :. 4 . ,t . . ; - 4 �:., --� �Z-Z 2-D(}- , m-,' 4#S /- Z �$-5�-- -1 i - y r M P' - - i F C� --� t S - .r = -- - 5 $t r�i .�W�"" �`. X62 14� S 471. - ='' P/R DEDUCTION 9, 063.48 : I I- 63 . 4488 . 148! .. -..-. ,. ., ..., ..... T22200 _- 06/2a/S9 PULL7L•IG EMPI..OYEE -T. D : _. .:.. _ ... . ,> , - .. _: _:... __ <.. , .: >, .:ii� .. .. ., ,. .. ..... .. .�.. ,. ...,, ... .... ...1.. :, - r, z �> �� s s .. ,�. .. .... .. . ...., ... .. .. ... 4 <. .. <.... .. - ... 9 < .. _.. -. -: .. .. .. .. a, , r .. .z. 11 � .., ... .. .. .. ... ..... ., .. .s. '. .. ...... ... .. .:, ... .. ... .: ,... , .... ... .. .:: , .. .. ... -. ..... -. .. 2 _ .. -_ ,., �.... -.. ,.. 2.. ,... .,.�.,. .n:, . ... .. _. .. ... .. .. :. .. .. ,.. .... .. „ ..::. , . , Z .A -... . .. y. .> .. ... :: -. ... ... -: ,. ice, , ..: .,.. .. .:. : .. .:. ... a. -�Y . S . :.<x F via. t:. .,, , : Ma -gip. '� 66 r , . . ..-, 7.4459' _ _. S4I400 _.. .... r.. :", ....:, _ ,._ 06/Z31S9 MINN w :::.STAT.Ew .<:TREASURE:R _: .._ MOTOR .,-, .. ,C. FE. 7 1.4 �8a ? , .I _.. ,. .: ..:. :::ti s, �:. 6e I. ,. 1e. ... _., _. _ „ 691 152! 4490 '5 ;' 541.400 06/Ga/3'� MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS i_IC. 798.50 : 79 .50 ', - � 1701 711 40 _. 4-9-1 5 40 6T 5------a ' 6--/-Z-3-/-3.9- --M•-F R-�-.4r-----�--- I , .• _�__ T R R lfi'R'A M $;. -____.___-_--______-_,.-__-_"_-_---__-- - ,�tl-: 0 a - a- V-3D-� 1D----rii72i % ;.. _. a, • . . __ 5 �. . ... .1. _.. . ,.. _ -... . :. . , .. .... . , t . 'r, ., . •347.40 14i 75i _. 5. ,. : , , L 449 Z 1'90404 06lZ3l89 REPT. `.EiF <NATURAL 'kEB�►URSES DNR LICE N3E - " . 347.00 . 76� t5r� -.. ., ,. _. ^ ,. .._ _ , t 4530 i f "' 1355 !Ali 7:50 0 06l2 9189 AEDD tNG �THt?1 A5 r f i a. +i rvv i" 4G,f-1'�7` f�"` ...r:.-f"l t ilk G ■ 010200 OT/06/89 A.E.C. ENGINEERS i:i`., `' S '' 7757"77,777 2r:. .r; _777, { RAL`:BOARD 0 EXAM. . ' 150.0 ;150 ..00 50 ,Y 52 53 54 OUTSIDE ENG FEES 195618-50 19561.50_ 55 56 VOUCHREG CITY. OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 UeHER-fCHECK-.-RE.GI-S -ER._.��__ " FOR PERIOD 06 is , J _ , CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK s' 6. NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT . 4515 _. 1404?0 :, __ O6/�9,/B CLERK:. OF: CNTY: DRI:V :LIG FEE _ , .: , ,, f...7.00 17.00 , 4 o, • �1 --�- � 55---- o f.. / —P*D- ELF�A E A�-%W ;-I Nom---F��s-- F-GR--SeR-V- r r c�0-----�-! 3 4518 400600 06/Z9/89 J.L. SHIELY CO. MAINTENANCE: MATERIAL 21003.76 21003.76 4519 T51870 X36/ 9/89 RIC:HMAR ,GONSTR:UCTI N LNG. - 'AWARDED CONST GTR 31,060.To 31 060.76 1�8i . - iso -5 FEES -F k Ft ERV"I CE— : 00 =6+� : t}tr , 4522 541400 06/29/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 256.50 256.50 231 8; 24( , -" --. - 45 8 .: 54f 400 2 ;:;c R USURER .,:;, ;_06!..9/8 .:';MINN:�' ,.S ATE:. T E MOTOR EH LIC. V . � 10 �4 .00 10 646.00 X61 20 ,� -}� /+� { { {� r+� "'f_�J it7`C�7�+TtJf'*? � try �� / �7 �� Q Jy Q �/ �s '(� � � '�' Q � �'j T_ .T lYiCiC.TrIiG T`t(CE` -Tl�iQT ■ .. �y c �y �} `� r �ZTIG-'Ti► ['�Ei��kN-�i ,., ,,. 2„ FIRE PROTECTION 477Z43.75 519480.75 ;301 231 :241 rf r. �777 C 32i ... , FIRE PRdTECTLON 578.50 .75 _ 5.0b 33 31 4 .. n i ;271,.. —�T5 ---- '8 0 �*O t? r1 i f fS t'1 T V E t Mi Q T / R '---E'A ST-- O N's ---ter ��fiI RE ISE rT. C .� Q -. E_ - P #ZO E �t� N � --4 �, D-; F}�j-' j36, �21 29 FIRE PROTECTION 60! 877 .00 1381 ; .. ' '3u. SUDS MEMBERS 44.00 66s381.00 X391411 -~ i .7 ,90015 , ,0�/80�� ...__UNITED .ARTIST. THE/ETRE_ 45 .,. .,. ..... ,.:..,....: E3RL�GRAMS : jj 431 +33' _ _ d c 8-- fJ # rD---�� -9-/ £f' --- -5 I -M M-9 ? S ,sa-�E�Eb E� Pry- �9� �4�D –��f arM I N E R f � 0 : ao - 5 0 . t�1451 44( 134i 34si 35; 4529 848520 06/29/89 STONEIKEITH ORAL BOARD EXAM 150.00 150.00 �'! f481 i t 4530 i f "' 1355 !Ali 7:50 0 06l2 9189 AEDD tNG �THt?1 A5 r f i a. +i rvv i" 4G,f-1'�7` f�"` ...r:.-f"l t ilk G ■ 010200 OT/06/89 A.E.C. ENGINEERS i:i`., `' S '' 7757"77,777 2r:. .r; _777, { RAL`:BOARD 0 EXAM. . ' 150.0 ;150 ..00 50 ,Y 52 53 54 OUTSIDE ENG FEES 195618-50 19561.50_ 55 56 a1363 050350 OT/06/89 AURELIUS9 LUCILLE TRAVEL 11.6$ , IG 115LLOWANG 59,$0 71.43 ! ` a_ . .. ._ .. ,.:IfiE::._. _.. ___....,, ..,:.:..._ . _ .,... ,.. _ HLCtEESNi£BATTERY ULI..F.. : -.._..... , ,r 77 8 d f ts{ 74 , F17 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 19.32 {21� 22 � °' ,8 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 28, 00 X23+ _. E j �` { F' 77 124 f. 2, ... .. .,... ... .. ... ... -.. .. ... ... . .... ..:. . ...... v... .., .: �+ Pi £S VEHI CLE 471:25 ;261 i !22 ENT -1#-T( �--- R flI�I3'G T C +L+ t L-3�N-'r—=, : '' ;: ,. K ti+ _--� 4— 4 r • i r. `-moi. "+` i2T _ _ �' .. 128; 23Oi;: i29 l {so -' 24 1366 080900 07/06/89 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS UTIL 2659 E,7TH 24,5+4 11 :, ; ... _ _ OUTSIDE EN :..:_... �. a 2-, UU,TSIIfG~:. ENG..,�'EE., , = rG .t'� 4. 135' 2S: ,> .... OUTSIDE ENG BEES 184.73 137 35! ,33; OUTSIDE ENG FEES 84.86 139 �&04-80� �4 01 3, C 0 U G � '{� E S. TSiDE, £N 80,74: .142, OUT S.ID . ENG FEES -10 ...79.; :43' —z 3`38 : 8 r44: 3� OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 54.08 !45 146 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 30.7' 47 _ f_` N ' 1 -N -E rtf�i i48 ,.. . OTHER CONST: COSTS : 1 j 150 � _ OTHER" CONST OUSTS 200.51 HERtNST` t�SS s52 OTHER CONST COSTS 95.56 49189.74 153 154: � VSs: ' t i ( u T �` ! S'UP-P--.���Y-EHi- E:: 4 �y 155. 1368 04'147., 07/06/£�.l DRUNS�GN INSTRUMENT CO. EQUIPMEN?' OTHER r�_ ;,_roo 59 ,> fic y00 13-69 101400 07/06/89 BUILDERS SQUARE MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 79.36 sa` 162 MAINT MATERIAL 17.96:3. .: - --- — -- — - S -UPS' -1 -:3 -E -S --V£ H3-C--L-� `� -- _ ✓f; MAINT MATERIAL 153.38 290.60 s -- --- I ;-T-0---�--"4-0-1--5 5 0 ____ _ 0-7 /" 4)-,6.-/ .8 9-_-- PURE' -A U---C-R-I-M 3 -NAL -A -P -P- R E H-E-N-S-1-C4'N DAJ T S, -IDE-_, R -C- N T _ _E -Q U, I P _ — _ _ _ _ —_ --_ 15 0 0-0 3 OUTSIDE RENT EQUIP 450.00 600 .00 s, '70 S . . - ---- - . - 8 r I,.Ci'I.-x.75 0�'-/-O C.-/ �, �+---•- C` S .. BUJ -I MESS ---EDL!{ A-3 I-ON--.SER"'V 7-G'�S----T'P%AVEL-..&----I'h'A"I 1V ------____--- _.-_.-_—^-------- 94-,-0"0— r - 1372 110360 07/06/89 CANVAS PRODUCTS REPAIR SUPPLIES VEHICLE 16.50 16.50 - `-' LAND IMPROVEMENT - 35,803.83 ' F70 LAND IMPROVEMENT 269468.62 999631.15 171 p do: da AW;-,?sup-lAES 173 �32.�oo 1 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 VOUC-HER-n-BECK-REGISTER T. 2 FOR. -PER -LOD-:0.6 --V-G7U-CH-E R 4 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 1373 110390 CAPITOL R:UBBER STAMP COMP SUPPLIES -OFF A &.25 23625 —1-1-0-4-9, 0-4T10-61 8�� C-kR-L-P.-xGN--T-R:A-C-T-GR UI P' 'VE Hl 3.1 Q6 a 0-8 :112i ' SUPPLIES VEHICLE 13.28' 1131 49.36 &-F+SC-A- 13; ;14 PUBLISHING 57.60 .117! LEGAL & F LSCAL191 115 .'z0 351.00 16� 1376 131100 07106/89 CHIPPEWA SPRINGS FEES FOR SERVICE 14.05 211 14-05 1221 .17'. :23i 1141 401 a0 0 -7 0, 8 9 Q L- A- R K -B G Pr R F) *A �'D M FE t+B -E H-1- -,5 : 241 2 R,75 sm. 1261 1378 150900 07/06/89 COMMISSIONER :OF TRANSPORTATION REPA' R: N T/E 10 44: 10.4 4 '271 1281 22! 23' 1379 15Z500 OT/06/89 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS, INC. FEES FOR SERV I CE 155.00 ;29! pot 155.00 po! j241 131' 1 cl A i321 12 b 33; 2% ;27' 181300 OT/06/89..,�DATAIDISPATCH .�,�FEESS'-f --,,--$ERV.lCE .15.00 35! �c i281 291 1382 1818 07/06/89 DAYS INN TRAVEL & TRAIN 113.8z i75 :37i ;381 : ri 130i TRAVEL TRAIN ..Z.65- I 1391 i . 3 Q A T KI 2 wo l 32", "1.90045 ' `8E : 421 1383 07/06!89 ..DEAN R R Y-- A SS 0 C I; AT ES VEL 43i 0 33f -a 1341 . ..... TAA ..'s. 1441 1451 35i TRAVEL TRAIN 390.00 31785.00 461 !47; 36 m kf A 1PKF*r 1 137f W�t�00-7-7- E-Rl*A-J-E-l4E EPA4 !48! 38, 1385 :QT /06/89 • .210050 u i6l t t; H. N LCALCORP.:�,, .. .... ....... . i0i 39! �suf $21 401, jai;SUPPLIES OFFICE .SUPPLIES 4 W .-63.60 .63.60 531 541, 129.45 55 10 421 561 431 -.;,ZlooT 1441 Vl 14 146162 14 7 14811 1387 2 3 1525 07/06/89 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC EQUIPMENT ��:PURCHASED. 543.T5 61 543.75 63 , LAND IMPROVEMENT - 35,803.83 ' F70 LAND IMPROVEMENT 269468.62 999631.15 171 p do: da AW;-,?sup-lAES 173 �32.�oo 1 r 0• 76 5-. &0- 10 4ti... Ul/06/gV HENSL.EY, PATRICIA CITY OF MAPLE_WOOD 25 HEALTH LIF : DEN„ INS 60.04 " c 0.00 TRAVEL & TRAIN 6.31 6831 �I PP TESD- fil�-aR3 1i -84.9 - :t TAl. _ Y 1.06- 104.95 }45 147' 36i 1404 400815 07106./89. DANT �. Tai C�+.._ . " . r SMALL tL Taa�.s _ 53.. 8 �3 r�'',�.'.45 j48 ,49 ,.a 4C� > - ---1-43'5--�-^'1-c.�ti�.•--�-#� � /-f, �-----�!•�`M-•—HA-�-G-H---S-A-�::E-:�-----'---' SM , ..: `521 ,.{-_{ , 42 1405 401900 07/06/89 JOLLY TYME FAVORS PROGRAM SUPPLIES �. 1� .43 .: 07!06/89 KEM i0480ASSOCIATES' OUTSIDE -.EEROING ENUIV Z4E..75 5.1 246.75 ;55; 1,5fi, 57I4 145i591 . 651.00 4s! i�-A4D74-0.61-L i '-� ±47 PROGRAM SUPPLIES r 1'� ` 5 I61i 4s - -- PROGRAM SUPPLIES . T7 — 16.92 �j •'�::.. t62 t by b4i 4 s �. 1409 406119/89 30800 06! 19/8 9 KO KESH ATHLETIC _ c r : PROGRAM SUPPLI E� __. 165; 75.16 75.16 5F SERVT{-E-S. 153 1411 470700 07/06/89 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLISHING 42.00 42.00 1412 500800 07/06/89 M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 93-25 �: SUPPLIES VEHICLE 89.57 n .t, :21 141' ,46 S,.rt7 555 07/06/8 + ..MERO - -. iV PATRICIA _.... ,. t FEES _ _ PROGRAM REG FEES 25.00 3 22 z; VOUCHREG{r 530650 07/06/8+ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MAINT MATERIAL 41.00 41.0 0- —14S, F E QF GN- ELRVI GE.-- ----, EES--F0 R SERV -*1-G E- r iVOUCHER-/-CHECK----REGESTER PAGE 8 777 77: FOR _RIOD 06 14� 540340 ?/ 0 06/8 _: ML.DWEST LAID :. SURI�E.YtiRS INC >; .. _ _ - C NT O RACT:'PYM. _ 00.:.0 C ;2s+ �� 2si 1423 540350 07/06/89 MIDWEST SIREN , SERVICE REPAIR °x MA INT/E 2 � 5�.�0 5Z.Z 33; ;. '-$� 4--�'--�-�t3-'�ti►',�"'_-'---�J-�-�}iy �G',3Z-�t't-�-NN_. _'-G--r-�-�-r-A-- .. ; — '�` .-y - 'r CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM 5.145 s; NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CHECK s AMOUNT ?a 3PROGRAM, 1501.2.50, 4130cf8. MAGOSKEY _ - REG FEES _ ( s 1-4-1-4 F`ti: Thi i J t��t�� �i �r A fY [i �Ti�- �T'I ITIiT,UN-I-F OR - 1121 131 t2 1415 510600 07/06/89 MAPLEWOOD BOWL FEES FOR GE _ . _ � tAt 15 .� --FOR--SE RV -I CE F-EE�`o ; .. -. •, tv; 1416 510900 07/06/89 MAPLEWOOD '"STATS. ;BANK: FEES FOR SERVI GE 126 00 1 Z6 ,: ,til ,, 1417 511700 07/06/ 9 MATHEYS, ALANA TRAVEL TRAINING 4.00 _ !n! '2 4.00 21 --- - A -I ---5-a+-0 :21 141' ,46 S,.rt7 555 07/06/8 + ..MERO - -. iV PATRICIA _.... ,. t FEES _ _ PROGRAM REG FEES 25.00 22 z; 1420 530650 07/06/8+ METAL DOCTOR MAINT MATERIAL 41.00 41.0 0- —14S, F E QF GN- ELRVI GE.-- ----, EES--F0 R SERV -*1-G E- r 777 77: ,. 14� 540340 ?/ 0 06/8 _: ML.DWEST LAID :. SURI�E.YtiRS INC >; .. _ _ - C NT O RACT:'PYM. _ 00.:.0 C ;2s+ �� 2si 1423 540350 07/06/89 MIDWEST SIREN , SERVICE REPAIR °x MA INT/E 2 � 5�.�0 5Z.Z 33; ;. '-$� 4--�'--�-�t3-'�ti►',�"'_-'---�J-�-�}iy �G',3Z-�t't-�-NN_. _'-G--r-�-�-r-A-- .. ; — '�` .-y - 3it. 5.145 3 . ,.. ; _ 54iS5 ,..: Q710f89 MINNESOTA CELLULAR ;,. ,: , • ,- ,-, :'TELEPHONE :. { i .2_: _ 3 137! '1381 i2& i29 143E 662600 07/06/89 NORWEST INVESTMENTS SERVICES PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 51036.56 VOUCHREG f: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 9 gl ------ 0,64-2-94-89-'-'--4-5-e-46, 0U-&H£-R-l-C--H-EC-K--R-E-G3•S T -E -R--- j , E 2 _ _ _ , .... OR C IQD 0& ..., ! 3�+L-i� 3 0I ^ 2 I 3 lao 4 j4 CHECK VENDOR CHECK i E5` VENDORITEM ITEM.. CHECK s NUMBER. NUMBER DATE " NAME DESCRIPTION,- AMOUNT:: AMQUNT 7 ` n -T I - ` . E-U-P'-�-�.-� E S-'--h-�i� I-t�-M�E`Ni' , :. a ,. ... .. ,e ..... .. , ._ ... .. , .,. :.v ... v. ♦v. v. v w . ., a..M , , . .✓..,1.LT.IL... ��5�+ .7TH , 3i ;4 . 44� n .. .t. ., .,.. ... .... ,. ., ... .. ,. .. ,. r". L. ...,. s.:. ... .... .. .0 .. .s rte.: 12 10 UTIL 1695 BEEBE 1.3 731.56 114 13 Y' , 121 - UTIL. 1995. COPE 18.94 1s 16 r _._.,., ,y �. L�-L-W�A3E l . . y. ... •: -x _ .i 113 < _ UT3L.. 513:: CENT 38 1440 710669 OT/06189 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC. ! :.._ UT.IL., , =;1' a35 " .. • 1�8 i 2a i16 ►, ---vii" -1` C'� � !21 UTIL 1:00 STERLING 3..90 22 h8l UTIL 1600 MYRTLE 3.90 231 1�s; UTILt '1_'_' CZ T j24 4 a' 41 LIT I L 1 . 0.. CORDT� . 525 „ <. ;26 4,153.20 i" ; ;s4: UTI �' i S I*� • 1 �• r 27 , _. -4-6-94- -.-ART122! 29 123'1 UTIL 3-45 CENTURY 85.33 30, ;24 UTIL' 1501 GENEVA 13.20 311 I -- 12, < "UTIL'. . i 33 �, � , - 2 IL�5fi CONWAY .. : 3..34 ='1341 ;46 .7 .. Ar_ ....UTIL ��7f� WH Bs• AR a � 1 �7 T A• 0 0Q - _ 3.3-.-{? .2_: _ 3 137! '1381 i2& i29 143E 662600 07/06/89 NORWEST INVESTMENTS SERVICES PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 51036.56 5,036.56 iia j , 3�+L-i� 3 0I ^ R EA PP fi 3 i-l�S Ar i Aim F i — lao ,32 EPA R IR: MAiNT EQUIPMENT 6' . 00 :<•d»1f 247 x3 : :3� 1-43.-8 0-3-1 -�-I -E =!-H :�• -- 71-5____07 - -E /-0 / 3'31 D R0-- -0t 4�fi1 -S - ` . E-U-P'-�-�.-� E S-'--h-�i� I-t�-M�E`Ni' :r .'�`4-�,�-�—' �-�-: C� 3i ;4 . 44� ss n� 1439 710360 07/06/x.9 PELTIER, WILLIAM F. HEALTH LIFE DEN INS 60.00 60.00 45' X46 {4;' � ---- _.� _ ' 38 1440 710669 OT/06189 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC. ! CONTRACT PYM . 10.50 102.50. =:5a 157 1444-----7-4-1-3 4 5.--- -P-E T E R S 0 N -, -D E L -L: ,-C O fii � E �t 1�-� J,£ -N -S -E -N-•. - F E-E'S---F-O R---- S -E RVJ- C E - -4-0-00-.O0 1�s; r 4 a' 41 FEES FGR SERVICE 153.20 4,153.20 i" ; ;s4: 14 J. ' -44 ,� - - t 0-7 5 5- -- - 06 14 9 I-�-- - -P 0 W-4�A E-� ; S -U -S-A- "; ------ - -. .. ,... .. :. -- Pft C� � fi A M -R£ �i 3'S 3-R�1 fi-Ia� fii ....: : .... -i � -�3 -- �-4--t� 0-�--�56 t, - i45i 1443 7%`07 ,9 8 BUSINESS. X50 17710/PRECISION BU�ILVE�,S SYSTEMS - EQUIPMENT OFFICE _ 50.0059 si .. ;46 L -I S-UPP--E S---QF-F-1-C - _ 3.3-.-{? , C�=- - , 611 i47,,, 3 8 S S � S �'' 1444 7G1.:�00 07/0G/C'� PROFESSIONAL PROCESS FEES FOR SERVICE r 10�..�3 8 3 106.0,E js2� i 1631 ,ds► , ,4 L. ug r} .— 9 _ 1. _ 1445 7400 06/19./8RAINBOW FOODS �. ,, .... PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.0 165, s6 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 14.54 J3 SALES TAX 170! r PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12.79 171: =".0 -_ f'-RO G R•A M -S U P+ -L_ 1- F_ S --- PROGRAM PROGRAM SUPPLIES 15.9Z �. PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3.87 3 ----_-----------'------------------'--------.____.--------__._.. ._.- ______----------_.___----»___ ROGRAM- SUP PLI-ES__. 1.4.8.9- -, .... .. ... .. .. . .n lam. ., S .. :. :: .. ... ,,.. .. ... .., v, ?' .n.,. ..#..... . ,. ..... : .:.v. :..... , .. .... .. : ,.. , , '. 9Y y,ON A r.. . •.. . Y v...�............ ,.. . , s, .., ' " 146 .. „>:, ;,, .. :. , . , , . , ... _. _ 1455 i' .770740 47/06/89;.;'.;RYAN, MIGHAEL ; .: HEALTH LIFE DEN INS Er0.00 fii 0. 6 00 sz ,4.f i 1 11 � n 7 hl !� L'+ ,.. - �-�-$ ,..E I UIP E T E M N i <:- •fro j ,,7 ,:OFFICE , , E ULA ENT OFFI ' - fi � �z; SUPPL�L-S=8F-F-1-C E — -: �-_ --------=84- ss� -- 1457 790500 07/06/89 SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA TRAVEL TRAIN 180.00 180.00 ;`a ti 1.452' , 804 X75 07/06/89 .,, . , A S. _..:SE R :.. .: _.:. _ ,. :': ,.. 2. , . �;:.SUF FLIES JANITOR T . �-- „ IES :JANITOR � . .� �� x.:88- -ar 7 s :. a _ R-�C R A-M=-S-URP l -E S�--_-_-_-_— ;11 s� L /I'-- I9 . I � I I _,� ,CNI 1 ; ; - . t ` y6 VOUGHREG CITY OF MAPLE�iOGD RAGE 11 , -,-- --- a 6 f� / 5 9 : 1-5 � r. _- . > -.:. t f E -R -n H EG-�K-TRE--G3-S-T E-R�--- , :_ . .: .: . ---,-.,1-n' 2 -: .. _ . e :.. , , . ... :. "., :.:. . P'E R {� _. FGR: IOD f� ..,. _ „. , r < .:::. :.>. :: ... ., . . _. _. _ _ _.. _ ._. _. � . 1 2c '"' ) -�F G {JiE Rte- �� : _ _. _ . _ . ,. i t51 CHECK VENDOR CHECK . VENDOR . . ITEM. _1. ITEM CHECK ! 's I6i .NUMBER. NUMBER DATE -. NAME DESCRIPTION;_ AMOUNT AMOUNT 7 6 -r --}----W, .-.. ... 1. .: '.. ... .. o .,-a:. .. .. . /yam �/j �j�{jy� .... ...... ..> " : ..,:', .: : ,. .. .. ...,. ,. i 45 I `Y I I. P , $ 225 > 0 19 8 S M LE :, _... / I X TIME..-,.:RECORD.E..{�..:::. �_... z ....Sii1`Pi.. t]F, :.:C _ . _ ,.....,.. _ R ,�.. , r, _. ... � ES . F3 E ,�. ,a 5a � 81 <, 10 r, .a 51 81 �. .. ... .. ,. ,�. ...... ..... .,:... .. ..: ... .:... ... .. .. ,. :. T. �y t z .. ...., ... w .. f... v . ....,.. . ..:.. .,.: .. ..•....... .. .. ,. 4 . , �`� e.�..I [� 4 z.♦ h, a r.. N �{ 7 <<,.�. wk, r, C.. 2 , � r m. ... -.. . ,.., .... ,,,,... -.. ... .. ... .. .. ... ,. I •- L G� , --.`�+�'v--'�'-`-v-v�,-�}'�..""-""{��"7"�`t}�"'-S�'T`�"t�t-Trti-" n` .,r. <. ...x.aS., .i'{'.� .t. ... L7 L` f1t�?!� Cftff'st11tY�^i' .. :,... :.:...._ ,, ..,,..t_+it ��"'f.r+.�.,.�.,.. <...:.,;y;. •,.�. .,,. :..... .� 'P'P'�."�'E'I' .... ..:: - _ ,< ;:... .,... .. �+ ; i10, .: �,1 . , SUPPLIES ,OFFICE 1. 13 , 19 13, 11I 1,5; t 12j SUPPLIES OFF.IGE Ott r 90 08 (t s ,. PFS ......... .... ... ... .. .. i ... ,. r-7 , . , . .... ., , . .. .. .... r. - ; ... -. .. ,.,r. .. ,... .. s ,. > ..... ..\. 1 .. . ,.: 3 is r ax , e.. .. . .,.. . }yam ..: ,,. ..: ..v .,.. ,,.. .... a: ; .,... ,..... .. . .. ......... .. .. ,....... .. .....- :. .. ...... .. .... , .t. .. .., 2 .. ... -... -. .. :. U LES<:.EiF�IG > 8:. 04 ...:............. ..... ... I - ,.' r. .,' ..... J ..... ..: .. ,_..__ , . , -.. r �, ..: ., . ... ..:... . ,. .. .. v ...... , .:: .. :,_. r .... ... :.. .. .. ... .:. .., .. .. .... ... .t- ..., ..:.:. w�:,.: t:, ... \ . _.:..... ., , .... >:: , ..,_, ,:. . .. f > .. . .. „ .. .. ... . .. .... ,. .. .. .... ...'.. ,: 1 .: ......... .. :.. .. ..r:..: .:. ,.. ,, .,.. .. t :.:, SUPPL: ES .<t F:3C.E::,t F i :-, ... 7.9.., , . -... __ . _ .. .. , _ . ,._ »..• ,:; < _. , _..... .. ... __ .. , r� . jys` 7' SUPPLIES OFFICE 156.80 ,2, ler , !z3. r) SUPPLIES OFFICE 62.x,2 _. < :, , _ _: , ,. ,:. :; _. ...: _ ,: ,..;, ..: :,. . ,. -. .. : -. ' 14t�1 £i4040 . .. .. .... .... _: ,, ;..: ... .-,. ,.,.,. .. e.>,.' .. r:.:.... ..-..::.,:.. .:.:. :.:. ..:.:. .:. .., .. :,. :. .. ..:.,. ,.E, -., t .: . .. >. ,. T. :r.1.. r :.�..� X26 1 l ?27i F 0 . - .- ..> - I t771G6./ 9 8 .... :.. , A , .. _ EP _..: _. _: S P UL CITY OF R AIR:,_IA.;iNT..,< ,..... ;..., ;: >. , .....,.... .--, .:,..NR 2�b.04 � . 22' .. . :.. __ �-EP-A-I-R-�l�4-r-N'T'=- L-00 :0 REPAIR MAiNT 125.66 301 9;; REPAIR MAINT• 420.00 f31 '. . 124 . ._. _. . ,. ---- �"-#t EP A R. N .. ...,. t.:'. ;. u .. 3{ .:Gam- '331 �. _.::.: . ,...... _... ..... .. .. _..... , >: _ _ FEES..:FGJ ..SERV,ICE 15.0 .4 a 34i _ _. _ _6 .. . _ ___ _ :._ _ .. . ,. .. .., ,... ,.. r. .., ..:. . ..:,.... . ....... , . , :. :.. .... ... , ..; : . ... / .. I. _.:. ... .. �: . .:: . e. ,. : . iIz i-4-62 - 8 41-� G O--4 .20.. 4-/-1-?94- 9-9 -ST -AN #4 �`-R-E A T S T E R r' %3 E "- �'-I-� 23-5 99 . ce -3-55.9--8-7 - --3-59--8-7-,3723. ; 37 I 1zs'. i36 ' C) 1463 54257. J G7I0�I89 STATE OF MINNESOTA BOOKS 21 .00 21 .00 i3sa . {30, 40 . _.: .. . . ,} _ 1 64 843200 _._ 07/06/89 .:> ",. .,.. ..., STEFf"EN �GGTT TRA -V �::T.RAIN " .I,I 10r�8 - 10.28. i 4r f) . . .. �� . ... .. " ... . " . . :d �1 . -- '4 ----- iYf� 1-0 ?- ,. -G7-/-4 • S ,•----r-.-�#�- - !i� - P-AR�3 %_1-1 F�'-�-E-'7"' EZ -H3 --E '4th ; � 4-6 :-X47---` - ,,4F . ;,4 � 14616 860305 133.50 146' _%:--3 47iJ 3 _ -' - - .. . -..1iIFt�F.MS--C1=U���IN(x . , ... .' .. _ ., ..; . i3 �5i��:t3{ 46 .� ;.4 . -; 1467 8610650 ' ,c ., - 07/06x/89 TARGET STORES PROGhA'M SUPPLIES �, ' . _.. . . _____.,_ .. .. 32.47 . 32.07. III3 ;50 - ,. 11' � . 152' e0 146.8 £64800 07/G6/�,9 _ TEAM LAB CHEMICAL SUF'PLIEC JANITCiR 127.50 ;53 54 D, 4 SUPPLIES JANITOR 200.00 32T.50 `55' =2 U `, 146.9 8612100 . 07106189 . --. .. ..' ,:. ... THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEV r REPAIR: MA INT/i! _ _ 15. , c 9 - 92 i5.. -.: , is 156:' ..: . . 1 . , >., . . .. ,__ .. .. ., _ _. _ . ., . .. ."� I s 4y -- 1 I t�--,S742-0.0 .:' --074-G� -/ B 9 --T-3L�L--�C:O-NP--A.NY- , ,; _-MA4-N-T-�--N-AN,C-E--M-AT'-�-R-1-A-L .�,25_ i F 1' q . 40: MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 177.09 62' 48 REPAIR & MAINT/V 16..00 218.21 163! `w 164! -- 4 g; . 1471 882500 061/19/89: . . TWIN CITY TESTING .` OUTSIDE... ENGINEERING` 530.00 ... . ;661 . _- :. :. : .:. .. ,-.. :: .. OUTSIDE ENG 1 NEER INC �,, 020 r 0U ; . :)< --------------- --+3UIDE- ENGIPIEEF:3.fi}G_ r ___ �_--___ . ----X24-:{ -0 5; T54- -0 E6. ,t9 - 1472 890100 G7/G6�189 U S WF3T TELEPHONE 1,458.47 _0 '� . -T--EL E -PHONE - -- - -- --__ 5 G-, ,�-4---- ------ ---_. . . TELEPHi�NE I r- 50.94 ... :. -..- -'_ TELEPHONE 50- 94 ; , 1,. _ ---_.-__...-_--____.__.__--___.-.__-__..--__._ . -._._-_-___._._.. . . - T-�E, E -PHONE_ ____-r�,__-_-_....----.-_------.-.-._Y_-__----._278_-,..9.0___._ _ _ _,_.___ __ �. l VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 12 , V GU C HE R-,/ G HE C K --REG "f -E T E -R - ----- - -. FOR PERIOD 06 1,2 :, V 1.Ifi HE R-/--- CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT ti TELEPHONE. 1:1,071 W90 ; ; TELEPHONE - 4:3.? 4 921 TELEPHONE 48.74 ;,3i ` TELEPHONE 40 .74 TELEP-H-GNE - - -- :-4 : 4- 7; TELEPHONE .05 14s - TELEPHONE 83,E0 qi ---T- E L -E -P H-kjNE TELEPHONE 38.90'z<, TELEPHONE 52.65 8 u� - _ 241 TELEPHONE38 .90 26 . -. 2c. _ TELEPHONE 39 &:.00 , ,�• .2� _ TEE E -P H-GNE - z8 22 TELEPHONE 111.90 s9; 23 TELEPHONE 67.95" 2i '.24 - 2, TELEPHONE 50.9 ,33' : - - TELEPHONE 19.5 V T-ELEP-H-GNE 7 39 3& 23 f 231 TELEP14ONE 109 .0 41449.22 ssi 30' -- --/-6-L---te -4T------ - - 391 ;4Q� 41 3 1_ �: TELEPHONE 8.4 i f 4. 3 1` 3 3 , ---14 T-41-0-R-14-S--SNL—I-M-I-TE" 17 +_.__918 44 4si -- -35; UNIFORMS CLOTHING 72.75 '45i UNIFORMS 3e CLOTH 1T6.10 147' 3&1 ►;� tr c� — — NO !481 a 9' , 38 1475 _.:. 9085 06/19/8 UNI1tERaIT:Y : F:.:.MLNNEaO:TA TRA/EL ::TR.AI'NING.' L 5 ..00 ;>: 85 ..0 0 51, I < : 52 !4r 1476 910050 07/06/89 V.W.EIMICKE ASSOCIATES,INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE 59.28 `53 !s4! _ 1 SUPPLIES :.OFFICE 98.81. 158.04 ., ssi .._ 42' ss 1 ._.....,1477 ...:.., 911.300 :.; 0.7 /46 89 , VIETOR J� . - . i..COBRA t . ,. .,. ...:. VEH,I.:CLE.;..�tL Q►�ANCE.. _ i ... ... .. 14&� .. ,.. .. { .,. ... -....' .. . ,. .:.--. is ,,. n fit 14 1473 911500 07/06I89 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER UNIFORMS CIOTH 69.7'!,9.T6 i621 `481 . .. , . 5�------.-�-�-2 - o �a - 1� I S -I FPfQ I I -E S rf - -R'�N N� a�> F-�� 4 .. 164 .t ,. . 9�t�..,00 07l46/ 9 8 - C WEBER 'TROSETH INC. _ - :.. : 661 s,. �5 a.4zL+ES�E�t�—�f? :-5,W6 056 8! 77 53; ... 1481 940550 07/06/89 WEHRMAN BERGLY ASSOCIATES INC FEES CONSULTING a 151..14 '7,'; » _. a9 . '731 .:., . PEES 'CONSULTING 4 o " T6 S 711 :. 5,: 1 4 bre ----a 4 #-EGD-- —9 7-�Ey 6 / S �f - --GSH � Ot�FL-�; Bf t �--- .---R-EN-T_ : �. �.� :-$�?-- _ tr6i 12. 0 - ,_: ;2b 129; ---- 137i 138 ,3n, t :3:; f40 s. :32 a42; - i41 i34 ;G4i 145` 1a6 :35 1471; —._ �:. 38, +. 60! 5j :3;: , 15Z '4n 154: i55 i56! .. 157, r 44: i59% !46; } 1611 i6? 163!: j64{ 48'; - -- — 65i 166! gg 167� ram' r. ;tk 171 L 521 ?74: 76. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/16/89 CHECK #10193 - CHECK #10180 EMPLOYEE NAME IGROSS PAY GREAVU, JOHN C. 477.58 ROSSBACH, GEORGE 399.42 BASTIAN, GARY W. 399.42 JUKER, FRANCES 399.42 ANDERSON, NORMAN 399.42 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 21634.46 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 11510.90 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 11004.50 BEHM, LOIS N. 11034.10 JAHN, DAVID J. 848.86 SWANSON, LYLE 976.24 CUDE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902.28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 21033.30 TAYLOR, LINDA 11050.28 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 11083.88 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 11083.88 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 11243.88 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 182.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 11878.90 SELVOG, BETTY D. 238.00 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 11029.48 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 633.39 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 972.68 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 562.01 JAGOE, CAROL 732.68 CARLE, JEANETTE E. 918.34 OLSON, SANDRA 644.31 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 21084.50 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 954.28 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 11178.48 NELSON, ROBERT D. 11800.50 FULLER, ELAINE 366.34 OMATH, JOY E. 972.68 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 1,082.29 STILL, VERNON T. 1,378.28 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 1,449.27 FRASER, JOHN, 509.36 NELSON, CAROL M. 11511.08 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 11355.20 STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 17581.56 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 11561.48 BANICK, JOHN J. 11410.13 BOHL, JOHN C. 11537.18 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 11800.50 CLAUSON, DALE K. 11403.88 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 11403.88 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 11403.88 YOUNGREN, JOHN 11706.96 PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 11561.48 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 11327.08 WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 11382.17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/16/89 CHECK #10193 - CHECK #10180 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY LANG, RICHARD J. 11481.55 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 11454.28 HERBERT, MICHAEL J. 11454.28 DREGER, RICHARD C. 11561.49 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 11462.22 BECKER, RONALD D. 11588.46 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 11561.48 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 11378.28 PAULOS, JR., PAUL G. 11111.84 BOWMAN, RICK A. 11327.08 KARIS, FLINT D. 11390.28 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 11415.88 GRAF, DAVID M. 11467.08 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 11403.10 PALMA, STEVEN T. 11350.36 VORWERK, ROBERT E. 11521.23. BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 11390.28 MEEHAN, JAMES 11601.05 MELANDER, JON A. 11480.62 SAUNDERS, SARAH 756.58 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 11538.10 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 11354.90 RABINE, JANET L. 11029.48 STAHNKE, JULIE A. 325.00 BOYER, SCOTT K. 11009.04 WALDT, CYNTHIA 815.67 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 11619.17 FEHR, JOSEPH 887.03 NELSON, KAREN A. 11077.53 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 11087.47 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 553.93 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 21084.50 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 11087.88 MEYER, GERALD W. 11213.29 KANE, MICHAEL R. 11342.28 NAGEL, BRYAN 819.96 LUTZ, DAVID P. 11132.68 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 11205.88 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 992.68 HELEY, RONALD J. 11154.28 OSWALD, ERICK D. 992.68 COLLINS, STEPHEN 230.00 FREBERG, RONALD L. 11177.80 CASS, WILLIAM C. 11704.68 ZACK, TODD 210.00 LINDBLOM, RANDY 995.08 ELIAS, JAMES G. 11334.28 PECK, DENNIS L. 11395.74 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 11262.28 IRISH, BRUCE A. 11635.08 GESSELE, JAMES T. 11499.45 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 11310.28 METZ, TERRY 11195.56 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/16/89 CHECK #10193 - CHECK #10180 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY LOFGREN, JOHN R. 933.94 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 11878.90 BRENNER, LOIS J. 11067.88 KRUMM E L , BARBARA A. 486.34 STAPLES, PAULINE 11642.28 JONES., LUTHER 72.00 BOWES, WILLIAM 365.00 TRAVERS, DANIEL 103.50 MC MANN, KEVIN 400.00 MARUSICH, M. JAMIE 400.00 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 11100.68 LINDORFF, DENNIS P. 11132.68 GARRY, WILLIAM 992.68 HELEY, ROLAND B. 11175.88 MARUSKA, MARK A. 11342.28 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 818.28 AURELIUS, ERIC 396.00 BURKE, MYLES R. 11197.48 BRENNER, JAY 452.00 BURKHARDT, DANIEL 200.00 MAYERS, JILL 135.00 AURELIUS, KIRSTEN 131.81 DOUGHTY, LINDA 350.00 SHELDON, LEO 88.75 HANNEGAN, ANDREA 50.00 MILLER, SHERRAL 107.90 DREGER, KARI 177.75 JORDAN, CARA 62 DAVY, MARY 40.00 CLEVELAND, JENNIFER 105.00 HOLLAND, ANDREA 171.25 LEKO, ANNETTE 112.05 FORD, JENNIFER 111.01 THOMPSON, JENNIFER 97.50 GRAF, MICHAEL 214.55 DALEY, MICHAEL 90.00 JANSEN, PAUL 156.25 PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY J. 70.00 CLEAVELAND, KATHERINE 113.93 HERBER, TODD 124.80 WILLIAMS, AARON 72.00 NARUSIEWICZ, MIKE 66.00 ANDERSON, CHRISTIE 81.60 BESETH-J R, RONALD 131.73 FALVEY, KAY 45.00 NELSON, JACKIE 112.80 IKHAML, JENNY 60.00 IKHAML, JIM 197.50 DIEBEL, GERALD 132.00 RAHN, CARY 109.98 JORDAN, ERIC 115.28 DORNBUSCH, AMY 171.83 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/16/89 CHECK #10193 - CHECK #10180 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 11372.68 GREW-HAYMAN, JANET M. 11157.48 NELSON, JEAN 375.21 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 567.94 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 886.34 FISHER, LYNE 159.25 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 11095.53 BARTA, MARIE L. 936.68 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 11878.90 MISKELL, NANCY 330.91 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 490.58 ROBERTS, KENNETH 11010.28 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 11467.71 BERNIER, SHAWN . 180.00 OSTROM, MARJORIE 11563.08 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 11187.88 LOFGREN, ROSANNE 31.50 WENGER, ROBERT J. 11286.28 LA CASSE, TELLY 105.00 LA CASSE, CASEY 136.50 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 17279.22 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 11152.68 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. 11706.96 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 11217.45 EDSON, DAVID B. 11217.45 MARTINSON, ERIC 230.00 GERMAIN, DAVE 11174.28 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 11288.68 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11053.48 $170,786.13 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 $ 61925.84 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION 24,295.00 AFSCME 2725 491.36 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19-3988 160.00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC 18.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 238.00 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 514.91 $ 32,643.11 GRAND TOTAL $203,429.24 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECK ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/15/89 CHECK #10403 EMPLOYEE NAME ------------- OMATH, JOY E. PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK #1 MN STATE COMM OF REVENUE ST FIRST MINNESOTA(FICA) FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA) GRAND TOTAL GROSS PAY 2,814.26 2,814.26 562.85 197.00 211.35 211.35 ------------ $ 1,182.55 $ 3,996.81 Agenda Number Action by Council: AGENDA REPORT Endorsed Modified..... Re j ectea - Date TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: AMBULANCE BILL - APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION DATE: June 26, 1989 An application for cancellation of an ambulance bill has been received from Richard Claeson. This individual was taken to St. John's Northeast Hospital and was suffering from chest pains. The ambulance bill was $90 and he has paid $50 of it. DFF:kaz I i APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES NAME OF APPLICANT: kI e LA -12- 1 ' ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:�a e- • �J"/� CITY STATE %%%.C.J ZIP PATIENT'S NAME; DATE OF SERVICE: J�r `�l ��Zli TOTAL CHARGES: �`%. DDUlm /�l[�� WSJ • � s REASON FOR REQUEST: J Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): .2. Other: I certify that the income information I have supplied on this application is true .and accurate. Si ned : Date* INCOME INFORMATION "INCOME" means any amount receivad froin the following sources by any Resident:. 0 Any Public Assistanc.e, including but not 0 Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, limited to Welfare, AFDC,, SSI, and overtinic pay and tips Vneniployni6nt Coniliensatioti 9 Interest and Dividends 0 Pensions and Annuities, including PERA 9 Rental income and Social Security 0 Business Profit — for self-employed • Estate or Trust Income individuals, including Farmers .0. Gains from the sale of property or •Payments received from properties being securities sold on Contracts for Deed • 0 VA Educational Grants List all -residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any): 1) income listed shouid inciude all income which your household can reasonably expect to receive during the next 12 n7onths. ''11I2� "RESIDENT means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of •the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME OF. -AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME (per month) (including employer's address, if applicable) $ fry � � d- � - ;��-� ��!�-� '' IOLA %V Jew-;7t� • TOTAL INCOME: per month per year i i AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth U. Collins Subject: Application For Liquor License Date: June 30, 1989 Introduction Action Py Council . n o s e d- Re J e 1,t e t j Rodney W. Palmer has made application for an i-ntoxicating liqucir license at 2925 White Bear Avenue (Red Lobster), Background An investigation has-been done on Mr.. Palmeri He has no known contacts with the police, nor can we find that he hol ds a liquor license at any other establishment in the state. Recommendation After a careful background investigation on this individual and a discus— sion iscus— sion with him, I do not find sufficient reason to deny his application for an intoxicating liquor 1icense. Action Required Application for intoxicating liquor 1icense for City Council review and approval or denial. KVC: j cc City Clerk Liquor File 89-008200 Action by Council Endorsed....... ,.. MEMORANDUM Modif ed, ,,, Rej ecte TO.City Managers Date FROM Ken Robents i Assoc i ate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit. Renewal LOCATION: Sterl ing Street, south of lea i l and Roel AI~" PL. I CHAT / OWNER . Mary Anderson Construction PROJECT: Crestv.i ew Forest PUD EIATE:. June 21, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting the renewal. of the conditional use permit for the Crestview Forest planned unit development ( PUD) N The PUD was approved for^ 132 townhouse units of which CCS are currentl y constructed . BACKGROUND The City approved Council � roved this PUD in 1979 and on April 24 o+ this year approved a minor revi ion to the original third addition as, part o+ the f i nal plat approval for Crestview Fourth Addition. (See the map on page 6.) ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36-442 (e) of the City Code states that "all conditional use permits shall he reviewed by the Council within one year o+ the date of initial approval m . At the one year review, the Council may specify an indefinite term or a specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, , for subsequent reviews." DISCUSSION The only change in surrounding land uses is the proposed Seth Heights Addition adjoining the project to the south. There have been no changes to City Code or in the other~ surrounding properties that warrant revision of the original conditions of approval. Since 77 units have yet to be constructed in the level opment , staff is suggesting that a five year renewal of the conditional, use permit be granted. RECOMMENDATION Approve a five-year renewal of the conditional use permit for^ the Crestview Forest PUD I subject to the original conditions of approval. 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Project Plat and Phasing Plan 4. Fourth Addition Final Plat krcrforpud LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 OUTLOT C N'Dfy WP F-97/ POND UD40 ! 1 A- CREST VIE -r C RES -TV 1EW ;,, ,1L;4 FOREST, 3RD. A .h 73' i FOREST aa> ,'Q, u T L O T,�,;�: 74, ' PART CF C�ti'MC N 7,0 • �3 9 AR E Pomp 4 d0 'Ow SEE PLAT COPS' I, FOR DETAILS FU7-C)*RE 6E'.Al H461o!5#75 ftDr0I7'�o_n/ PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 PHASE#2--=16 UNITS, MARE SOLD PHASE#3=--28 UNITS, .18 ARE SOLD PHASE#4---24 UNITS TO BE STARTED IN FALL 1989 PHASE#S---32 UNITS FUTURE STARTS • DENOTES SOLD UNITS �RTVIEW FORE�T PROJECT PLAT AND PHASING PLAN 5 Attachment 3 Crestview Forest Fourth Addition FINAL PLAT (Approved 4-24-89) 6 Attachment 4 City Council City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B. Maplewood, MN 55109 r8ETTES vnderson HOMES FOR BETTER LIVING MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 8901 LYNDA.LE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55420 JUN 2 TELEPHONE 681-26 61 �'�3`3j 7th Anniversary ,,,-4AZV .Tune 19, 1989 Dear Council Members: We wish to renew our conditional use permit for our planned unit development of Crestview Forest. Enclosed is a map showing the various phases of this (PUD). Phase number 4 will be planned for this fall. We have many additional sales which are not shown for they are contingent on buyers selling their homes. Thank you for your attention on this matter and for your support on our development. Sincerely, MARVIN ANpE S CONSTRUCTION CO. Fred H as Vice President/Land Development FH: s jh MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Final Plat --Hazelwood Heights LOCATION: Hazelwood Avenue and County Road C APPLICANT: Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. DATE: July 3, 1989 lotion by Council: INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting esting approval of a final plat for Hazelwood Heightsis BACKGROLIND Endorsed.... Modif ied..., R e J e c t e Dat Counc . il approved the preliminary plat on June 12, 1989, subject to the following conditions: Approval of final grading, utilityg drainage, erosion control and street plans by the City Engineers 2a The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street constructions Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with* 3a Submit a signed develaper' s agreement with required surety for all required public improvements9 the off-site storm sewer, erosion control and tree planting to the City Engineer. 4a The provision of drainage easements as may be required by the City Engineer. 5a Approval by the Director of Parks and Recreation of the of+ - site grading and location of the storm sewer to the pond. 6a Revise "Hazelwood Court" to "Germain Court". 7w Payment of a deferred sanitary sewer assessment of $19284. DISCUSSION All conditions should be completed by the Council meetings RECOMMENDATION Approve the final plat . it Hazel hts .mere Attachments in Property Line/Zoning flap 2w, Final Plat (reduction) 30 Final Pl at (separate attachment) 2 ids 07 j • i his -• • �. I C Sh 'SS •'1 i �� d 2Ms � - . r• . fit C a ; • 1 fir• c• nr •fyy • .� J fr ;; � 2 7 .►t N 1 h tv • 6 Ts��is4t �OU, •• O aDv. r 4 39de, 00 .47aG. V - • R �. •.— •� .� .— � � � « ~'' �i. ' it • . .30 1 •1•• Ac 1 00 Oh/ 'L• )' . I p 0 .1. •� '• leo' 1��' A a lie. CROAP = .: •� OUNT Y -F •� 4 T 43 ! 3 r 3z 31 30 t4.� 2a N �--- ! t (2� 33 p /. 2 34 Z� -• S� SJ Z74 ..« •:� ��z c . • ns �:5) 241 O� Q" r• 1'. ....�..• .�...... �--' = � t . � S . , iii `�•'-' � �, � -O - (i; r v ..✓1 i t ti 9 411. ilk I / • 25 P% 0 1 � ;; Q 011 43 ID PROPERTY.LINE / ZONING MAP • 3 Attachment 1 '[ -3•q li rIl Sri wl 1. 1.il A%$ 1• 1>61 M YM•Z MU 1. 1>•i 949 156M 10 >•"1 1693 ZI , IF CM 0C lei( tic •• V N �s %N • 40 b P- O I rl 1 wJ �_ ._ _ _ •► i w �/ •2Zi 00'06 lt'►• qTJ 1 •r V 0 90.0tT - Z • v 1 • 77��. � ►/l K 1• ►/1 Mf 1. 1••1� � • w w �O'O«! •92 11•N► 1• a" 1493 � 5 i i • •- ZO'0� �� 20'06 . •w... - N I i • w w • j i w g ; g g O Co cc �l ; ♦ ( e� all 4 lot - ft N N• •+ `e, 1i www. �...+ �� •i C,,.... �•w.C,0.0ou a w w "w 3rW3AV 000M13ZViAUPOSOXON ^- 90'091-- a� •sti t +es r ►n �s N «� r•M J " j 4 Attachment 2 c F4 W r y ogre y C. • L .. • w O •. • C • p 6 •12 �+ • M M r / • - Y• V • Li A `•` • • CC • w- • • M Ar w1, w� h e ML rA CO•t v w„ y O •�.�. A•~O C O O \ • M ,s v • • • a 9 •••• e 1 w A • w -OX e w C •. • i t e•�1 tl ✓ • e •. e C L • r V 6 O M • Si ••• L • w i • 1A. C of • • •• .Y. e+ rte t> so • a e p '• • ••i 1.0•C O ✓ O 1. •! w •u Cw O • • t• AV tl e a • t4 ✓ r Y 0. • C • • L • a iir ^ o ✓ ) i r N V Oc 34 Op A L t r� • •41 0 ! vtr 1. 40 l w/� . 0 0 a :/ i A f u • • r A i•O• * i t h •O 60 R C O• > \•a••' M Z • C Y XC tM• a do YS . r3% • C 14 L •• i• • r • • O •• • C *- L C •f ✓ r ri■ •w r A G t p �_ • 1 • n• 8 e e< Orr ! ► n Y N >. •O c Crc q w • r • Y e • N• • ► n• C V v� V 0 t• o• ] 0 h +•� 1 • n • • • •� t3 r.• • W O •1 • N.0 • 1 t • • ♦ L ■ r w o w V. >• • u O • i h i • 1 Cww J ' • >ae • ►• r S • •. .Ci • • .• A N • 9 • • •O w. 40 4 016• w • •+ t O• ^ Z • u •• • • r A • r • n ] • • • •• • / A C • •!C 0Crr Co C. O O 3 • w M ✓ O • C - t C > 1 • •• V C • A r a W > • • w 0 t 1 • n s• 4 ✓ L • •.l • n •: • • • C t r �= • YI >• C Y O Y O w e ..A C • r • • 1 1 w 1 • e / +• C` • ]• • t \ • , • • • w • N O C • go • Y • w • o ] > n • • L t ut NO W • a Y� w +nw a• ✓n • • yt �C •� -11.b •• �S /. O 4. 6 11 ww • ✓ r 1.� is C wr •• L - a n • i w` >. • Y a ••C • r VwOCr \•fO. •w • p Y• \JYY•1 L s. tuY if I L •• / L rRt C. • • ON % C 16 4r ~i•0 1•1 VO✓i^wL• • wLS• r l•• • • NVS V• Nx A+ . 8Zw 0iL• \^✓• W 1.0 w• i i r s V C •r 1•r 2[ to C w pwu 03 r_tn• Vrt1A .r••n. ' •' r - IL•• 0• w0 Mt••• L• wN • t w\rJ to 16 • ` ?. C C • O t t ] = CCC0/• /wL, L O • L Y ✓ • Y tso wii 0o 4 40C e • = y • • • �/ • ••• r / • ] ] Sr • i•t rjr • • • • • t V %O •• • Y• Cu M Y w C n r A N : • t CO •• t A •]r V ] A • Yq.h, O • Y • • Y •� LID t Z r .. JC N 0. w •Y • ['w N -w •` a > • • ✓]1 4• 9 0 4 O• •• w.► a� Y Y • .0 Y r • 16 • w AN ✓ N• C u (w O MO 1 C C. • r•O Y 7 t t ]• f h • O L• •• -000 t h 7• • C• • •• • Y C • • . ✓ • • C • C 1 •L • is 3 • S • O • • ! t t �. i • r C • • w ` a t r t r 1 • ••• \ v Ol A• •✓n •orC 1 • w • n 1 • i r V C I •+ • • L 1 Y ✓ ✓ C h•• • • • r • t•• V •• e w rOd • C w r Y C✓ ** t• Y i • Y r p y O . 0 C w y �• _' . a C 4 r t t •• L• C r >•t O • • Y • • •r• •w 1►ry .1� •w • 1 A • w • A • C e M w C V O • w itC r . c• w . • t V L t • • •.✓ t /A • a t tao • < r C Y. • • iV _ < ✓• ✓ CSL iL \ O •n•t ••w • t r q r• r w O•• w < l w A. 4M w • w t o L L 4 • r ✓a i c c ]• C s O• r w d 1] O • I •t.w •w OC • n C ✓. t N • r • t Y r t t • O• r• .• • r o r• Y • • r > C• • L • 0 • Y r ✓ •• N • •� > r .. t Y r •• t w O>• C O ) N W w r tl .d 1C Y O• •! >• •• NW C� C i 1 17 a r • w 1- • • w •r C C ] O u �•� w • Y •■ n •• • O 00 a s.` L. • O L O u )w a 7� \• 0 r. O t t • ••• t h. 1 9 - •. ••■ O ✓ L O 1 l\ 0 ••• C el r 1+ .• w •tea C • ]0 awn o r V N t r O �• V . w• r u t L l Y • 0 0 2 r A • 2< C V i C •• +• w r ++ I •• J a [• •\ • a0 • u • w 2< C Y N •"• r; w w • i' Y) \ a " " r i� t 2 t O _ • Y •" O C C V Z >a C. >• O • + • [ a• p u ,.0 r• V N M t C 4 �+ v t • • O Y �.. : •• w L 0 0 • • O <•/ ✓ 0. 1 Y i! • nL • • t > 9 O • Y w M• w L O • t A • t • O ♦ t S t O •. •••" •^ ► • A O> tl G Y •1w ♦w Y Lo >` • w^ •• O V•• V C 0' > ♦Y C • y•• w .• Y • cMc 46 M i ] • rr t aC w C C • .71 t Y 0S•• • r • C •+ > ,= C . 0 •[ Y •� 2r • C. Y•• C h d O w •• o N ] r C • L• Y • Y✓ w w Zw w • NY • • O t O •> L .• C} 1•• w wu I-uIs < � ••* 0u I- t ` • A 4 • Y r < • C P. 14 v a►i Nu 1- 0 i C 4 n a• • O L VA r C Z SO '[ -3•q li rIl Sri wl 1. 1.il A%$ 1• 1>61 M YM•Z MU 1. 1>•i 949 156M 10 >•"1 1693 ZI , IF CM 0C lei( tic •• V N �s %N • 40 b P- O I rl 1 wJ �_ ._ _ _ •► i w �/ •2Zi 00'06 lt'►• qTJ 1 •r V 0 90.0tT - Z • v 1 • 77��. � ►/l K 1• ►/1 Mf 1. 1••1� � • w w �O'O«! •92 11•N► 1• a" 1493 � 5 i i • •- ZO'0� �� 20'06 . •w... - N I i • w w • j i w g ; g g O Co cc �l ; ♦ ( e� all 4 lot - ft N N• •+ `e, 1i www. �...+ �� •i C,,.... �•w.C,0.0ou a w w "w 3rW3AV 000M13ZViAUPOSOXON ^- 90'091-- a� •sti t +es r ►n �s N «� r•M J " j 4 Attachment 2 c F4 W r y ogre y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Award of Bid, Front -End Loader DATE: June 30, 1989 AGENDA ITEM /:: —/ Action by Council: Modified- Rej_--_~ft~�~�~��. Date— All major manufacturers of front-end loaders have introduced new models in the last one to two years, therefore, information relative to performance and reliability is not readily available. In light of these facts, it was deemed advisable to solicit bids based on the total cost of the equipment for a five year period. Two bids were received, both well within the amount budgeted. Results are as follows: Item Case Power EgLtiP__Wll Inc. Z.ieQl er , Inc Bid Amount $76,765 $817559 Trade In -18 a, - Net Bid $58,764 $63,559 Guaranteed Maint. Cost* + 21500 + 41000 Guaranteed Buy Back** `-3 1. 3 800- -4�����' Net Cost** $29,465 $25,559 *City to pay up to this amount in first five years or 5000 hours, whichever comes first. Dealer/manufacturer to pay any additional repair costs. **At end of five years or 5000 hour period, whichever comes first. Award of the bid to Ziegler, Inc. is recommended. WCC jc Attachments TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., Thursday, June 29, 1989. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for one front-end loader. Present were: W. Cass and J Chlebeck Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read: ' Item Case Power Equip_.., Inc. Zi-eg-ler, Inc Bid Amount $76,765 $817559 ' Trade In ' - -18 -��10� Net Bid $58,764 $63,559 Guaranteed Maint. Cost + 2,500 + 4,000 `^- Guaranteed Buy Back - - _~_--- Net Cost** $29,465 $25,559 All bids were accompanied by a bid bond in the amount of 5 percent of the bid. , Pursuant to prior instruction of the council , the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of July 101 1989. .. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m. . '. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD of B I EIS BE IT RESOL.V o BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OF MAPL EWOOE1 , MINNESOTA, that the bid of Ziegler, Inc, in the aMOUnt of $63,559- is the lowest responsible bid for one front-end loader, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city, . AGENDA ITEM MEMORANDUM Action by Counoij: ' TO City Manager ' Endorsed ---- Modified, FROM: Public Works Coordinator ReJeoted-_�~�==� ..Dat SUBJECT: Award of Bid, Front -Mounted Rotary Mowers ------'~� DATE: June 30, 1989 ^ Fol lowing publication, bids. were received for furnishing two front -mounted rotary mowers with fixed angle brooms and one winter cab. There was $26,000 budgeted for this purchase. The bid from Minnesota Toro, Inc. in the amount of $26,421 less $1800 trade in was the only bid received. The city has had good experience with these units, and all attachments (blowers, cabs, etc.) presently owned by the city fit the units bid. Award of the bid to.Minnesota Toro, Inc. is recommended. WCC jc ` Attachments TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for.a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10:30 a.m.., Thursday, June 29, 1989. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for furnishing two front -mounted rotary mowers. Present were: W. Cass and J. Chlebeck Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read: BidderTrade InNet BidBid Bond Bid Amount Minnesota Toro, oro, Inc. $267421 $1,800 $24,621 5% Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of July 10, 1989. Meeting adjourned at 10:45 a.m. ' RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Minnesota Toro, Inc. in the amount of $24,621 is the lowest responsible bid for the furnishing of two front - mounted rotary mowers, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. PLEASE NOTE: .Action by Council: Endor�ed,�, _ This item has been carried over from the June 12, Meeting. Modified-,..,, Rej ect e d„....., Please refer to that packet. Date AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by CommI3..-41 Endorsed,... TO: City Manager Modified FROM: Assistant City Engineer R®j ected............. Date SUBJECT: Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer, Project 87 -20 -- Review Assessment Appeals DATE: July 39 1989 Copies of the appeals received at the subject assessment hearing are attached. All of the appeals request cancellation of the $500 per unit assessment. In general, the requests for cancellation of assessment are based upon the assertion that the property did not benefit, personal. financesq and/or the propriety of the events that initially necessitated the project. The general assertion that the property did not appreciate in value is not confirmed by the findings of the independent appraiser retained by the city. The assessment of $500 per unit is within the limits of accuracy of an appraisal of before and c �-x+ter market. conditions., Therefore, the $500 unit assessment is appropriate The owners of PIN (29) and (42) made a specific comment that storm water does not flow out from their property. The attached aerial topographic map confirms that there are depressions on both of these properties. A copy of the proposed storm sewer shown in the initial feasibility report is attached. It shows the depression on Lot 49 PIN *(29). I.t was pl anned to extend a side drain from the catch basin on the south side of Geranium to provide drainage for this area. This part of the project was denied with the street and water main improvements and was not built. However., the downstream pipes that were built as part of this project and previous projects are compatible and provide the means by which this may be done in the future. PIN (42) also has a depression located upon the property. However, the surrounding terrain is such that this depression may reasonably be filled. Then water should flow along a swale on the 1 of 1 ine between Lots 4 and 5 to the side inl et previousl y discussed. The storm sewer installed under this project and previous projects will appropriately convey this water, The owner of PIN (22) states that the property partial I y drains toward Century Avenue. This is correct as shown on the aerial 87-20 Assessment Appeals page 2 Jul y 31 1989 topograph. It is not possible to determine a precise percentage of ,the parcel draining west into the project tributary area without a detailed site survey. From observation, it appears that a majority of the property is tributary to the project. It is appropriate to "square off" assessment boundaries to avoid future confusion due to assessing the same parcel two times with Partial assessments. Therefore, the parcel should be fully assessed at the unit rate of $500 at this time. BAI jw Attachments June 12-1989 To City Council ofMaplewood, Minnesota. From Mr. h Mrs. William DeMouilly. 2645 E. Geranium Ave. Maplewood Mn. 55119. Parcel ID 25-29*22-11-0017 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT D/ -P NO. 5847 PRO--TECT NO. This is a written notiCe to challenge the above project. I cha-Ileng.e this project, it is not a PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT OR A S -1r -ORM SE EE PROiECT. It is a private improvement on rri'va to lands. T challenge this project, as being of any IMPROVEMENT TO ANY OF THE ASSES E --FED LAND, in fact it's only help is to the lands that were purchase at a greatly reduced cost because of problems that this project may reduce. I challenge this project, as being caused by the ILLEGAL ACT OR ACT'S OF SOME OF THE OWNER'S OR FORMER OWN", S of lant--il's that created this problem, it is difficult to it A. W believe that they should be rewarded for their actions. J I challenge this project, as being of no value to the land that I cawx-i at 2-16,415 E. Geranium ave. That in no way will it increase the value of this properties. i B%e-cat-Ise o rT ' the FOL.I.F.- CHALLENGE listed above, I believe only those tt.--:at benefit froLlrt this project should be held responsible for it's cost. This cost should not... be the responsibility of the s-rurround.i;.. rig ho -fie owner'sor THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD. YOUR CONFrUSED PROPERTY OWNER AND TAX PAYt"-:.R. Wi I I i am D Mo 11 y ASSESSMENT ` HEARINS APPEAL FORM ^�� PROJECT M[]. ��' Address of Assessed Parcel -.424C Flas. Property Identification Number: 4 g. - A I - - r _ .0- -0L L (12 digit number) %]o -you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise.or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close.of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city Council consider (check one): Deferral of assessment b. �--) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) Cancellation of assessment d~ �--) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: :r VA 6, Aal� 0 - - ff- - , A - 1 1 Z" AANUIA0 - Am MALL Oe 29;~((Frint Ni�W6_) (Signa Ure) a (Address of Property Owner) (2j__ it) zo�qj� -- Telephone Zip"111 ELIZABETH M. HANSEN ' 265T East Geranium Avenue " Maplewood. Mtnneaota 55119 T39-0483 June 9, 1989 Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Ms. Aurelius: RE: STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT D/P N0. 5847 Project No. 87-20 Geranium/Ferndale (Revised) PIN 25-29-22-11-0018 Assessment $1,500-.00 I appeal (and protest) the assessment against my property at 2657 East Geranium Avenue as identified by PIN 25-29-22-11-0018. This appeal is based upon the fact that. the entire project was a landscaping and beautification project a few properties on Maryland and Ferndale Avenues. The project simply enclosed a spring -fed flowing creek and the landfill was then sodded by the City of Maplewood. .There is no storm sewer or other man -.made project involved. Further, the disruption of natural wet -lands and the open creek have created standing water problems. Earlier enclosure of the creek, where it flows through my property, and landfill was accomplished at the property owner's expense. This is what should have been done now if the other property owner's wanted the creek enclosed. I previously detailed my opposition to this assessment in letters sent to Maplewood's mayor and all City of Maplewood council members. Sincerely, Elizabeth M. Hansen EMH:srb c• Mayor, City of Maplewood City of Maplewood Council members 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STATEMENT fly' ASSESSMENT D/P NCI. 5847 PROJECT. NO. 87-20 GERAN IIIM/FERNDALE (,REVISED) THIS.IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE A FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS I T I S IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND .CONCERNING THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT f iEAR I NG. YOUR ASSESSM ENT FOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 25-29-82-11-0018 IS AS FOLLOWS: *3.000 STORM SEWER UNIT AT **$500L.000 EACH YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS WHEN REQUESTING INFORMATION OR CORRESPONDING ABOUT THIS STATEMENT, PLEASE REFER TO PAR CEL -IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 25-29-22--11-0018. • TIONS TO THIS ASSESSMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE MOTE. OBJECTIONS ASSESSMENT HEAR ING. ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS CORAL OR IN WRITINGS TO ANY PART OF THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY CLERK OR THE MAPLE WOOD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING1E/12/89 DETAt�; AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYNDT D/P NOm 5847 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT NO. 87-20 GERANIUM/FERNDALE (REVISED PIN 25-29-22-11-0018 TOTAL ASSESSMENT **$1, 500.00 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - $ PARI AL AL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHOR I ZED. � T a 0 F • P u 3 I l M P RJ V E M E N T IA.PLEwJJD 1 0KOv m NT NAAr. t GRNUMb7-1J lMP RJV EM�+iT No _ til PI D Z� Z9 ZZ ii 00-1 8 ELILAoETH M NAN-5)EN 2z27 E GERANIUM AVE �T PAUL MA 5ii193634 Pit OPE.RTY 'DES "RIPT101 -_ MID'VALE ACRES oto. Z LOTS 17 TAR U LOT 19 BLK 6 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. Address of Assessed Parcel - _7771 Property Identification Num er: S - - a. t 2 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form i.f you intend to appeal to the city 'I to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form councl must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city cbUncil assessment hearing. Your request w i l I become part of -the public hearing record. request that the city Council consider (check one) as Deferral of assessment be Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C Cancellation of assessment do Revision of assessment Reason for the request: (Pr:*Lnt'Name) (Signature) (Date) (Address of Pr perty ¢caner) Telephone 4%r�,cvr zip �J.S � 1,� ASSESSMENT HEARING AF*EAL FORM FGFMJECT NO. �- �- a Address of Assessed Parcel :Z 7 0 Property Identif ication Number: .(12 dig -it nUmber) Do you wish to address the city COUncil tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if You intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancelYOUr assessment. This form must be completed and +iled*with the city clerk no I ester than the closeof tonight's city council assessment hearing. YOUr request wil I become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city Council consider (check.- one) Deferral of assessment b Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C (17^) Cancellation of assessment d Revision of assessment Reason for the request� �t: t Y V 17 CW_V�2 CIL IV RY HARSANY, LN 2, (SignatUr't=) (Print Name) Liatd) (Address of Property -Owner) Telephone Zip j4o C& 10 =ZA-10- XA ' . � ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM � ^�� PROJECT NO. ~~�`' ��' ' Address of Assessed Parcel Z, 76 2____ & Property Identification Number: ~L 9~_ �� �, _ � � _ 61 0�, �� --' —_, '�' -�- _:� _�� _~�., (12 digit number) %]o You wish to address the City council tonight? �--) XYe No � Please complete this form if You intend to appeal to the city council to defer,, revise or cancel Your assessment. This form must -be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's City counc:il assessment hearing. Your reqUest wil1 become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a, () Deferral of assessment b° �--> ^Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) xc. Cancellation of assessment /000(cj, ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: Al7) �j 6fj j 61V ��515&,SS_ o0W4;-x-/ a 5 �22' �*' IfVi .7 , rint Name) "***S707 �E (Address of Property Owner) (Date) .' 357 _' Telephone zip �7� / ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM r PPOJEC-r NO.-Aq--70W7W0 Address of Assessed Parcel y F'rop ert y Identification Number: ,� - � � ter. S".•' � t / �r'` +" ✓'' �. (ice digit number) Do You wish to address the city council tonight? (.) ( > Yes No w M ease complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be comp 1 eted and f i I .ed with the city clerk no ]afar than the close of ton i ght - s city council assessment hearing. Your req nest w i 1 1. become part of the pub 1 i c hearing record. x request that the city council consider (check one) Deferral of assessment ba C ,,) Senior C i t i � en deferment ( over b' years of age) 0 C w C, Cancel 1 at i on of assessment do C , ) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: i �'' f`i.✓�.y� �� �,/ 'fa.,.+ � _ p i, 8 ..,tt. h .. ' r, y ..Mr y .� y: J, f. 1 i. ,,s f 1 /// `I+p .. .4. all .YYr r J 41 IL 4 s.. yf q,c� T R,..,ow,� r^J, �• �•T •S ,, .l ;'7 - s0'• f• s "a. r .yf w �e ♦ 1.. . j C Print (Name) (Signature) (Date) ':2 6: (Address of Property, owner) Telephone ... p r ,%,A j % 10 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO Address of Assessed Parcel B P 5W 4 -7 - Property Identification Number: c 1 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes N Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer,,, revi-se or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and +iled with the city clerk r,!,o later than the close of tonight's city councilassessmenthearing. Your request w i l I become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city Council consider (check, one) D,eferral of assessment b Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) ce (YA Cancellation of assessment do Revision of assessment Reason for the request: IVA- A4. r. ---L LF'70 I (PrintV- / rinName) Signature) 0' (Date) (Address of Property Owner) 07 - Telephone zip ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT ��O~7dPPZ0 ' Address of Assessed Parcel ot" ' Property Identification %dentifiration Number: (12 di�git number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ' Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight"s city council assessmenthearing. YOur request will become part of the public hearing record" I request that the city council consider (check one): all �--) Deferral of assessment .be �--) Senior Citizen deferment Cover 65 years of age) --' c" (X) Cancellation of assessment ` __. . cJ " (y Rewis,ion of assessment - Reason for the request: a -a . n,, _- .e — -. - , ' it (Print Name) (Signature) (Date) -- (Address of Property Owner) Telephone Zip %55//9 ASSESSMENT HEARING AF'PEAL FORM PR0,JECT.NO, 'Address of Assessed ParceI Property Identification Number: 1001 9 t 1 digit number) Do you wish 'to address the City Council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel Your assessment . This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonights, city Council assessment hearing. Your request w i l I become part of the public hearing record, request that the city Council consider (check-. one) Deferral of assessment ba Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of f age) C a (Z) Cancellation of assessment d a Revision of assessment Reason for the request: #4 //0111 se/ (Print, Name) /Signature) Wat e) AP 00 9(idi6ress, of Property Owner) Telephone zip.�� ;1 It's almost a year and a half now since you first started this project and w Y A �1 e .are still as bitter about it now as we were then. First of all, two unrelated projects were tied together and called storm sewer. This wry we could be charged for both, since you say your policy in to only charge a property once. Neither part of this project was sc tual ly a storm sewer. The part on Maryland and Ferndale was a lanrlscapinKiro,je•ct, because. s©meeo I e P P didn't like an open creek on .their property au.d otherP eo le were allowed to p Improperly landscape their property and in so doing causing destruction of v another's property. The second part of the project, Hennen' s property on Ferndale, was done to ereate buildable property out of a swamp. We. have r o argument with the fact that he be allowed to build on his property, but -it should be made buildable by his before permission is given to build - not wait until after the house is built and sold and then the neighborhood pays for his mistakes and his benefits. I oleo have .a piece of swamp property. Do you think you could talk my neighbors into paying to upgrade this piece of property so I can build on it and stake out like a bandit as Hennen did. We are not arguing; the fact that we have to pay $100 or. $500 or $1000 or $5000. The argument is that. this is not a storm sewer and does not benefit ne It us. Why didn't you call it what it really was and assess the owners* Then see how anxious they would have been to have the work done. We were also 'told that in order to be assessed it had to improve your property. I am still waiting for someone, anyone, to show me how this improves or upgrades sty property. My water stays on my property anti does not drain into any of your so-called storm sewers. My property is lower than the storm sewer. This information was also told me by your Engineering Department. They told we there vas no way my water went anywhere but on my property. And the landscaping project certainly doesn't improve my property either. What we are getting down to is a project that was bungled time and time again and on both aspects of it. Many of you have admitted this yourselves. You obviously vent someone to .pay for it and we are your scapegoftts , Some 0 fn�a that t w e have -2 -- talked to .. an the Council, also feel you have been "stuck' with assessments in the ha t, and seem to know how we feel. Anti others of you feel because you had to pay we should have to pay, whether or not it i s fair. You don't even want to try to is understand our position, After the last meeting, several of you camp out to see the project, for which we are most appreciative. We appreciate the concern some of you have shown, We hope all of you will realise that what we ares . arguing here is not dollora, 'hitt rather fairness and ,justice for all citizens of Maplewood and not only the so-called "big gays". Above all, we hope you will make an honest and ,just decision in our favor for what we have been fighting for for ove r a year.. Thankou . Y µ ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM ` �=� PROJECT NO. ��' Address of Assessed Parcel. OrV .Property Identification Nu���������/u���«� ( 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if You intend to appeal to the city Cc/uncil to defer, revise or cancel Your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city c1erk no later than the `close of tonight,~s city Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): ' Deferral of assessment tn` �--) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) ~�� C (»u� ) Cancel lation of assessment ^ ~_- . d" <) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 12/ 4! �- (Print Name) (SignatUre�' (Date) w Zile, -_ (Address of Property Owner) Telephone Zip DATE: Ma9 31 , 19 89 T0; Maplewood City Council Members FROM: John and Bernadine Mortensen .2638 E. Geranium Avenue Maplewood, MN 55119 'SUBJECT: Parcel I . D. # 25-29-22-11-0031 Public Improvement ProJect 87-20 - Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer My wife and I purchased our home and property at 2638 E. Geranium on February 1, 1959. Since that date we have raised four children, cared for many foster children and hosted foreign exchange students i n our home. My wife did not work away from the home for twenty years as she had much to do at home along with in the summer time she would can about 1,000 quarts of vegtables, fruits, jams and jellies, which were mostly grown in our own backyard. You see our back southern property ad joi nes the property which had been owned by Bradfords until Robert Hennen purchased it in the lute fall of 86. Because of many underground springs in this lower area, it has always been swampy to the point that mallard ducks made it their home and raised their young. Al ong *wi th this many deer used to favor this area. After Mr. Hennen purchased the Bradford property he sectioned the l and into 3 parcels of property and brought in al of of Land fill to cover up the swamp area. I work shift work and during the Spring of '87 when I arrived home from my night shift about 8:00 a.m., I saw two men in our back southern property walking between my back land and Hennen's newly acquired land. I went back to see what was taking place, and after some conversation, Robert Hennen stated 110 0 . you and your neighbors wi 11 be paying for this drainage problem one way or another in the future." Well, I guess this is what he was referring to. Only you are trying to pawn this drainage problem caused by underground spring water as a "Public Improvement Project. 87-20, Geranium/Fernadale Storm Sewer." .May I close by saying I strongly urge each of you to turn down this proposal and make Mr. Hennen pay for his own beautification project of his Purchased properties, as there would be -no need for this assessment if Mr. Hennen Mould not have tampered with the terrain. 'ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO, 7wp?wO TI'fiTEP., Address of Assessed Parcel L( F'roperty Identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city Council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if You intend to appeal to the city council to defer,, revise or cancel Your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's City Council assessment hearing. Your request w i l I become part of the public hearing record. I request that thea city Council consider (check one) Deferral of assessment b Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) CU Cancellation of assessment du Revision of assessment Reason for the request: -7, N r� C 001".o- 4- 12 fry I---- C10Y ,C/ � /1 / i �'� �OS e /1� G �. 0 ..100 e I - (Print Name) (Signature) (Date) f (Address of Property Owner) Telephone �- o6c� /��% AA Zip- 5 1�� ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO, 7'w?wO Address of Assessed Parcel- kjhIreA2A f� �7�/GG- Property Identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (J-) Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city .council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form mutt be compl eted and f il ed with the city cl erk. no I ester than the 'close of tonight ,'s city Council assessment hearing. Your request w I I become part of the public hearing record . I request that the City Council consider (check one) Deferral of assessment ba Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C (,�4 Cancellation of assessment -do Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 114 AF /x%55 "fZ aAllt .. 11 S S7"BsR of CooeL= 401& rArdE Z,4,14 r,�c, r�i� t ra�.u�s "4 Taffl.-W OW00too e .tea ^01 AMP®RW41A p�'i ff 'a4_44w", W W___- W (Print Name) (Si tore) (Date) �V4 STi l t w A roe %�d' c �/ Z > 4� �9 7Z_. (Address of Property Owner) TO e_ phone J. ��__TOYIII� zip 4 A A Samuel Waggerman 2695 Stillwater Rd 8t, Paul Mn.55119 6-10-89 To whom it may concern: my name is Sam Waggerman.I live at 2695 Stillwater Rd. St. Paul, Mn.and have for the last 25 years,In that 25 years % have had water in my back yard in the spring when the snow ' melts,in the summer when it rains,and in the fall when it rains. .Refering to project no.87-20 andparcel no. 25-29-22-11-0042 states that the area in the statement of assessment receives water run off from my property. That "s i mpossi bl e! Because, I get water from ' my neighbors on both sides of my property and in no way can the water ` run of+ my property.i+ i have to pay 500.00 because of mr. henning who in some way talked the mayor and city council out of a building permit and didn't live up to his agreement to. tat. --.e care of the water problem on his land,and which of course was a swamp that is fed by an underground creek,and he alone should be responsible for . If i understand the assessment regulation a property owner has to benifit from the project to have to pay for the assessment, two of the coucil members looked at my property and agreed that my property could not in any way drain in to any one elses property. i am de+inatly concerned about how these people li�-.-e Mr.Henninq can manipulate our coucil into giving him a permit and having the ne1ghbors pay for the council"mistake. As a home owner,I am 100% against paying the 500.00 assessment. sencerly Sam Waggerman ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM '�� PROJECT NO..��' �~ Address ofAssessed Parcel 2-;�(Oyg Srt1tWA1zk |Prop,erty identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city Council tonight? Yes No 1 Please complete this form �f You intend to appeal to the city :zouncil to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's City council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the cit)/ council consider (check one): ' ~-- a. �) Deferral of assessment b~ (--) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C ^ ) Cancellation of .assessment `d. �) Revision of esse*ssment Reason for the request: »' (Print Name) (SignatUr-/e) (Date) 6�fVS -S *71 -LW 4 7E K X. b q ac**/ (Address of Property.Owner) Telephone -& 4.. Mit/ . Zip 4.551)7 � � _•�.• r •`. ..ti r "'KaR+":• .I� �� -t: � '��tw.♦`�i: �?`~ l 't.};,,}• ��` ¢ � 1+� �� • �^ Av�; - �� j t��4��,•? ,� rt Z �j'� t { ^ �, �,: :( $., �,' �- ,r ..; � is q''i ,,r •'• �'•� ; •. �.�t. r i -r . } t ♦ e } a► � � '1 .lF9M!• tt..r � + ..i ,�. ,ri''�, , t, 'y }_•.:A ''ij �:•'r y.. � ! ��`+. ;;,�;�i. {'}:� ,i.l,�;� r1. V• i �' +'q'�3 1 .- r �Yi�, 1 ./.;4�v •�:, ,���.�, rd,r -i}'ti '� ^..�. �, .�-`'.(:r f, `�'��• 't� '�t. j±'�r � v• �. '! •7i, #' R,{, a '?a + ,.,• cC `fir t�; + A R '1i� 'N '! '�4"{� �' a � •t�vi" • �` aw► r,u f ; _:r�• ° s`� w q` i..a,: ,.• {� �Jy�i ,1 R '�,�. �' )aspB s ' "*y �,. T'� � r, -'� :�M r k: •'.� � ;r•8y tiei. R.8 � � � .ii r. • i's:.... �•� �i' "y� „� •i y��((� '�. �r +y_/'� 'r,L es ••s .- r .y�*y y�r •• w :11r. -.. �. �• � :'6 �'p. ) y ♦. K. ��-p�''a ,'Y.an r i^,"a!`" 'S' ar ^r, y1{;, �.41f•n.• .� +'.+;�. :.,rtjMy. ,! .. i •'ti..' ♦,. ,.,�:�r)�'�LC `iYx 'r�r '♦+j, ti .♦Yw�,�� ,r 4 . - .v.Mi�. i` ,bEp , ►- • � w �d� �.. ♦• �_9 t a �'�j�' ,� --tt �i ��•ita. .rd�`�'.3ii•- S 'S'�tF'� "�"v . -.8� i .r u�� + • ; �. {�-,1,r � .� �� � . • _ `� t.' ,�.a - . K:•• .'d'Y`'., � ,...rbtt'� � _ `��*iY r.�i ` �si £' r Y5 �t'�'�`. '„ r., '� � t .:'9(,,:,.. r: i' .i.,.r . .�; ' R. :♦ � �, .....wi. )t„�.r ,� "ar�"•`•i-�.' i91,_,A, " ,W -w�, �,�r y ✓. 1 _;�T�h `r,.. l� � �, r r ,. �.. .� M..' Y / '�'�+ : • ��! ria' JI 1 � � •� . �`' ���� J' • r :•• �> pr` �� � � �. r} 4�4 'ny !' a• ,��'' `r �+ "�' • R, ,r •a` ,,il ' � Fdf : t,. .,r �- �- i,' ♦:• �. �'.•`s 'ii'- .,�n. ��:: '-'sit � � r' - 1 �• �? •i j'' � r"',• ` S '�rt. � T�:��t' -,J,♦ pr � {�, ,,� may ~ T. .. _ :�' _ .�'i' i ,• arir « ' t y'•4) I. IV:+ `"= - .♦a ' • GB IN��[r '� a {rr rr SIM. / ` 1 t r' !� 8 a, / .!1.'h. .A rr ♦rO.y[ *',, ,.^ i �y i,7 F'; .�:. R.t. id •♦1,�-.''.� �� Ci f: • 1 R-� • rfr ,}� .. r i! y;' ;a_{+' >�-� . '!. y �e + '2• � .i , �»"+• ��'_ i» is •: �^'�1 >. .il ?� r• L��" ..:;,J' . .. J��y,- pyo _ 4F „ +T. y > 'h'...�• �3.y+� rr'� •5.�. 't' r �' � F. `�. -+ �5.. �•.•"' ,i "�\' A� •_,r_ r5"K � ,y•' •X A, ... N s- �'c"C ..�>er si�t`...ti•�(, t`,,..._ :,4 .�S'N'•4„ ..., y ,i 9c, . � • '1' �i r f v � �'t7( -. . _.rr+• y. . �:::.Y 1SH, � _ , ). •�Y �N +i - . iri. �' '�.�. :� � . it . ?t! a.'• �" �� ;a+, r. a ,a *' x .. ~` �� :� r.g ala Ty t�QyT �a ). � y w \.. '; p Vt Ia air ` s * � ..A-.,, ;,;IK•.� .;, H_ �•7 .. 7 a r_ •(!r, - •� � r .. ` Yyy r' �• 1, , �, �i ,>-� a/ � f , � {. •► -- .t . �} �,�:� "" - . �>.• A a 3'r. ,' ; rf -' i 0 }/. ro, rM.B' � `'vT ?. .y ,' ,s'. `• d. ``'i .. '~ \ •t .���. - •�a.�(� ♦ , �. - rW;. 1. ,/ ""a• � - . r ��: _ K` _ tr ,� I� _ fa Sri I � r j;� � N �5 �n•'9. • '� � r�t(t� / \Y •;:v '* t3+�:''J.:, ^�t;•.a�aa�R•r"^ �� :>.. > J J'" >)R., t' .. \ .-. rl I. Y �:':X` i r t�4,�i� •1'.rZ>'.,ir J , • _,� t `� ♦ of .N x • 1 r7 •'q •I 14 \ ,}• a r 1,, a •� ♦ I • 1•\ w 71 r `i ' } ,4�ry �w 4 i ' p�1 �. • s :1' �, •• .�'A . ` r X S y vii 1 'n` ±...''t•iY z :ff 1 ' y , r - •! 3 '�, �, f e • 7 _ ,y t::ii L• 1: -'4�: .�-�y'i:�,��• l; : � • `�', .�1�`;L'i ` :♦ " \":,:, t %j3I ,� wp W �,� v,.. •9s � ".� 7.J � �` •��A i � r.._ :� '' � :1•i o �. 2" 'r' " 11, M r '0' Y' . • z t 'AC y°C'� T 's+..i,r.,, o.� • 7 "r �. -'.d� ` - . +,� yy_•Alt �`: 'W^Nta;'. +tiwJ�. ..a ►. ,� A '�SS,r'. �t♦ a'"r"i'�: , �,r" t.. 'o � .{, �' L x '�' 1 -'�y fr h `;• �•,,.i'. .;•..'{. ll'-.. '' ,`�•1•r-• , , •J,r ` Ka r- 'Y.' .V4'31 1F j v w• 1�.•. � a �. n` � .-•4 •'' �`�♦ T �'F ' ISS � « �riaM.s• •y �.},_ •V, '♦.. ''`�• - ^ J.. �.i." •r ' ' i •1+ ve;, .. .Y' ,)' f ''M •i:''.� "� ,Q •♦• -t,''�'- .s ..�. �,<�, * � • gyp• .,F �'-::1... :E i= •; ..�' a � �' - ��c+.=:• ••F.ti..?tf A .:�:. � :t .r •. J -�. > r ,Fc.T�': �' LM}++�^� .fir t.• — _ ,.�•'�'• y a^ - 'r .i♦ t Y • ,... ♦* �. "t y4 T y` pr r�' ' i :'7. i _ _ :S ` _-i . . - ... `� . �_ .r•'� ••,ir. !�;''s+r � �...� 'J` s. t• J. n' .� 3 s: •ar. _ .":�:•- '� -. ..F � � ti' r � 4' .Rr d`: • i- {'t ,•, ' { C ��, Ji - r ' � a j - a . +: FM _ �4 •` ai�T" -- , ..� - •*. l'. ti• _'9"r. -'>'•• .� y�,� L � �. •,�e, .}• •K •.rod' .i, •6.:..Yyr. : )-• ♦. rBO, {,: . ` .;t'- 1' � 1;� ` \ , .a: "3?�. _ •a;°�... ♦♦..'� - ;!� sQi: f1aa.Y � v. of ^{ ' T ..y,,. ` ♦ r .�• .. � `k`-. - ;k„��'.�^. .;'SiW'. ..� ,.•... Vii.' `(";""T:- _'. ,'' r *::mak: � "�, :l', S.. r� .. •)` :a -7. -. �+•i. r 'r"*.+•.) _ - -. t- �A*'.i:{-.. '? ., Lex,. _. t r••�'' _ r' :Y' �,��` •iJii'. � 'L 1' _ +.• w-. ✓�• �..1T i Y k� a- 4•~ ', 1 _t A+ w�.. 'iC'-' S •.T'.: 4 { � 1.tYA �»• .Z ),-: Y .iei ii �`' .T.t• ,L"T f� ,. ti •}'- y�:i � . 1 R7a`. w�K• � �y r .`C.RW s+i��' ,�rsF • � t�. � r' ••r i w ti '�•• :h.. ,a:r " 'i:�d'' �' ;f.= ,4 • j, •� .,..,£i a 'P.. , E ;'? 3 1, - - .t'� t' u. 1• ' • � I s i . _ . ,a. •w. i*�t ' .. '''�,`a..d. E( ':.f,". t. .. � x•,:+A•�%� a" '-_'!T .:Z Cr �'. -..r. ya.°�:> r r+�► ,' /'.r. ^ �f ^''' _ v "i. t .: tr..f� `1'. rr. .^[ry ` ,uar \ s�i: ,. :t ' •�_ •�,�d'w �.�� _ y 'sa _� ;..�, r r � � - � -� r� � Y. ! .S •' +T . ft,T ' 'j � 3 !.. i 1 •�¢�'�. ,.{ '�C. � R.: • -^5 ,P»'� t � _: • ;♦ ' ''�. - 4f..: 1 -,r'� ��'.{ , .� ,r �'�` � .w s � � /I/�•��� _ y•-•�•n\' 'W 'aR;. ;�+tS;f °_`di. -„F +Y Lj 1: ')•. 4.,.- ..'Z .�" Y'S• :�-''i ar ^,S 4r`. ,irr r..:"s• 'i�` ;� *,, � T .•y .e r ;may ?� '-�-' � y. ,�"r fibra, J � i� r; �,&�. ,( •,,,. `t ry ••I 'rf � � i ,:� s -fi.��•'{ � Sy.ai}�`_if y✓ t F ,r �,.,�'i(`. z �:, Aw _ }!Tu, _ ��' '-) ad• . p•�,. '+'t �tA'_ .•'• >' �� jf •'t r'' Y _ `'1!i''i �/'+.:�' 9"'. :Y `�. ..�i!r 1,� f' -+R `.JM1O � i� �.yy��,,, 4 �i:� .}r.v�,,,. .1 .a,. •a:, ,,,i, +• k " 9 95, a x: + � a �, �rvr, r1.3°. ''{ _ _ syr' ��- ' � a '• •''• ; t .t' ? - t,.! .,k :..• �,j `-..w i+ "ir ti :�'.;63�i :'�`- n =:. .a+rl.i '> t� _ , • Ag r A1r- .ar^ �' `?. - ', ,,::;� �S,y�� •,L�+� rYi�+' yy } Sr, .i5• :"1• •"� } T� `� ..A� •'L"y, ' �+'� .♦. ✓.37 O 7 J' �, '.1 .� + S�'>:•s S • A . .*"} l L3 i 7 <' •}�� :. �� �, . ) •F a \` Z ,;'Ly r .'(i¢ 9S,_ . - syn �4�: _ y :�;.o; ay r..y: ;� �- J. i♦ r :,fir*+Zi ` ,, _ -,, .r .�• J�',`•{:.t' -� P .f M � .ate' ,ti t. '1.r. f� ,,\. �.^y } . 4 �. .z, .r ♦. hf'� _¢ se; ev . 'i'1�'.fY` �Y k .. � ti ! . ' r '�"' �- '.c;-•• t^' ,:,.,,, vr+. r' • i� : � ,.+°`dc . .y�r�p\ +14--.. w.=�.:7s' dt +r_ •r � � ,`� •il.-aG:. .ti.I'' .;F'''a' "'�. a , L„� }' .d. '+:'6 3.-k,-a�, ';'}' / r _ '� v1 d''$•.t-T - 4. Sr' ^.Jy .i', . L:;•. a t�t •^o•, 4r .., .� ro 4+:j.' y, �-.. "tea ` z• ..rl- :�j' r ,4r. ' , , t r f� Y • `� , a ,.,�'. , •r r . .a� S; :•di ' < i• ; tl' ; ' • ,w � M = +)�.: _ 'i .ate -R¢r I. -,�`.. •f►,_^,t� �'w.6`w.•.- (�,,,.,�..a_�i `h r •:f�v :a a - .•.�'� � r. + .'� Y - E, a:x a:�. ..0, _,.T *-rr.,,' 'vr •T . „{ ,yam .'r r,:... ?1;: .: ., :ar::� � ati F.:” 1 � `;�. "1;. - r $.y :.� R 'c... T.li _:rJ,; �+ 'pA" 'i •vF u� � s <. "+ a:.•rF :c -.a, . ry M,••: ;,;e/!? �' '2 :h l:`F, � `'° • `�' s. 'J_.Y' �,`;«� .�.' ~' ��tiy :. ,5� •yy,�,';ay"�'. M�i ,-1s ..-ta' �>�► f�' �y''�• gid-,•• ..�,:�r; a;J�'-T '♦VK•`, �.a �i - -`a _ '''< •��\ s�'27�;>'":'-+"m' `�•�' •3�f "a. .n• r'a•, .r t`'±\,. ,'r S' ''" y''4,.'..;• \ '3- �`��.v.-Y: ♦1_` e• :'( _ ^' `'- r�,••�: `y(.r`rr. :;,:x•-:hiE ti :i ..r �. r .i,. �♦a6RLC:; .t�� ,r,♦s � ^yYL )-. r �� � 1` •i �...! ��,�� � �r+ •4.wr'f'r.- _ >, L•b>. �• tic.' ,t..gr�.r{1y3•�^ice AY• ♦.�•• .;"+'� ,rf-'r.� Air•, .� .. • iWIF .,,"r • -a `.r.!. .. .ti;•_: y:,'` , ._ .. 1 r a.� .9 �` "`' '-'�r"'k "g"•: ' `�' -ri - '\ ,r,. _ i•!�"tiS�,. X .�)rr,' >�� \. �i ^•'ri 'n- '1s !a,_ •�� ir, „r T1^'-. ;� ,y.{. .+ .�5. ,.'• t. .� �•;;,qi �•,,;_' a. .� Y .a1 a .. tif!rl•s� '*.r, •,e,»srs _ 'r.... 1.6 7 •�., #K }a ys:_ n.:' `" r. `+ C �+�*'{' °_-.'�, w� 6 il.' t' .� `� '1Hi '# �rIC• r i.-`.�.'J't• 3<.♦„+v' s � .i 4 _ �c:, � :r f d••t k ;. x _ i ''� y !�$.a�, v t ?'.,• .� +ir. x ,�; '�� ` � _ ♦ 7� I:, aJr'; ,- _ \;:. • �t. r - �. �. .S-.i'i�'�+`r�✓ ` r•./r. k.� br ..a ' ) � :. r,.. rte' - ;.'n�w �`' _ ,1' _, 4.'. , ri' t� -°� i2j1, Y,.7 r � '� '•'a r- - r�;a' :)�, a !• s ,,�,,• �- • Z'r r i, ,J ` "Z +ems .fir »!C 4, .'�” ,s __ � ^•� .y. _' 'a LTJ .T_r' .'t. i'+ '«y; -5 . :v;`s,..:t'c.♦ R> ',.�ja�' t• _ ; :3'• x 'r•Na` �, 1-` ` ° ii Ol'��� •ti,}d 'z �v:` ♦ `�{' i ��, .s�: [':.'L f �l +3 'b. [ ,a, .t. •. * - - y. - � 'f. �: � �:. s r ,{_ {• > .t 4t a . `3. Y +r.s '���wT. t.. ' l,, ..b 1 ; - L a" � `tr'a'p• 's .;:�► t"� `r3. _. � � ;� .'. - ., . _ �.y�.!•_ "{. -\. -�,R,�-. A. :�. tr � '.,�_✓ �, �'r: t•,* _ i -e+l�. .d.• ,•l. P S +,�. ,�k /'BF.�, �\. � �,�} 9 . :f,�'y�•s'+Ifi' c + tr ' v gt .r w ; r%a1 j. a t,77 v, ►• i -•ate !>� ;.,iy _ _ ;), .. ..y:� T' ';i �iy.aR{•. 3, r`•`''W 7N ) • I.w� � ,'•� ,tom r�r •a-.� ,�t .� »ryb K• Y ...r .c. . r\ "'� � i'��SrT�f �,ya; -a ,y,. - � s ...� .-�iiY'�• 3 r 47 ,.?Yt9k•. °\ t aha ; ' :► sal - r t 1 r ° 9 t F- ♦: 'Ff. E• ` \ w c j., .mat a.), yt.'a. '�'' >. ✓, .� _Y. y �¢-• T,,.. ,.,.. jp;�.�T,(y� v 'Sr ,•" z' _ .+;••:'•- .1' fa +, ria. '�`' y .+"• _ "-�� .J!' 16,�•..st'. .v. :'ra vr.r` -i+r•+-.:.aY, .ir +Iyq,,��' •,.s. s. ♦, '.• - .'�. t "fir �'•'r ,'t. '`•t ..�:."w•' ••�16 _E� .� :� ? _.,i. ✓-. �1: '. 3.`a- r�. _•-'r ��> 'S' + M .h.,r._. 'y+: S. r�, :> r`.-y7F ,r�C�•'r; •,:i i r _ r. ..z } • �, r. _`. C.- '`,y � a�17 :t it -/• _ sf T�.. ,4 t y • wti�. tir`.. rt� :a �'� - :. ti T - .♦ - � �y;, - r:• ?.� - �w:t�.:''+ �. +� •r.., _ - ♦ .�i: ''r' •� �'�'""i xjy" �t�` -. is 'e. Y, ►S� • y ?�; 4i i' - - Sal •. �N`?. *-. .� :�r>R y,i• .i- `1. i�s _ �. �;♦• ' AY)p ^ ♦' _;�, . ��'�..• ,� . ^rr'1 � , .:'r•.-. 1" t= � _ ; _""y�E. ���`��iw ta' .Y 5:• 1",,,, a:{ r . ',Jy: `''"' < d: E K .Nr ! _ •^�,;;Y 'CG.,' _ ;.Ir E�'»•v2' 1...'• .,3 .r.. ,�!: • r fl., \ 'Y. .� •� •,i .. e. :'a<'' ;,�!. ,JMY:.7- �:. fY��r- y7M�.� -t.'. .t,• '"� _ >,k •s• .r .k w. _ ''♦ w "..,� �! � ��. �� ,a ,.r♦..,,IGas .i<i^ t � a: � - .`r: �. .�} jYr` .'A. .•P + wl - a '.♦ jt . ';' ' ,, ♦ f• . .. . , T h, _ ♦ 'dOr ♦. a`1.:. _ .(' ' ir: �ss►..e-0 :a�7' > ;�1 • •Y�'i..P4f'- ^ .r i} .,,. ,+� a. �, i _,* ,p. • t. .K• .adz t. 's_ T i � .��"T�/• .:�^v"c. t r:' r.• s•'' '\ Tyir:-. „�' �.y. 4', � '•: - �+y�.a.y S -t �- :} "�4:- y'. y�,� ,r '` ..♦. '-.A+''�.o R ♦'r �. �/h[�`[�%a ,. •.'i":`i'.!t•_. .:� �`ti ��;'y`.� I-� ,{` .:)r5C x-..i'���• . �5- � 1 � .v • - - rL,�sS�• - � '• r" 11' � - }-�• �`i, ^,• 9 - � .y., 5 ,IR. •♦V`" \ r tir}'S,r_ �#�+ it -) a ^� , .a •� )>%�.,. �• _` '�..�. 4. �. .}�,i.�� 11l' t,)� .Tl� � s.• r: ti'#� i��L Y, 'ii t - s. _. _""♦mr'`a..� ,�>1 � "�`•`r'': .,�-,_. +; .4-' t, ••, ^''� rA'�n v- •.) - i�r� /�y`�°' .�('� :- r �'`r.��1 .�+s}.• _ •* `+ .� _./•" ,��: � 'alrl- ex.r .1 .aL �'_, :�, !, i . �.•^5aT` �•••.L"- „r. •;;, [{�',. 'S.:a-ice• rl•., .a. (f ,t•• n .v�S..'� - .. ' 1 - "-� "a C ♦ '� . ,'t�,�ySr►•S�,, ? "ij-fii( _ ;rsa` s yri.l zre^ �_ _ ___ - _ Y.P' ` ,}•' J ,�, • x ,� .v11••!fi '( .,•Vl. - 13Prai' :r.- f.^ ;"=?`'t..•r _ j - �,� .:�. ...�..dr•' ;s'�r°�:•. ^,�. a• � Y � 'a �' •-*,. "�;sTa 41:' i �:: �� 't^'� - r ...j• _ �,t� i.. �' .'�... A �fisw p•' -. _._♦ Vii'.- ", - W-<`. .T + �'".'v-±a. Y.,',.A '_�". _,"• b ,'�F ``i. i +\y.�'� a s. +r'" ��` • � .,r„ - -r'•..r�._ eMd� '� a; --x � ,� ';.••r.. �� •r` "'a, .� 31 j.' ,,.,, . r ,i.X _ err �ri�: �, �, -^x` < r .r 9' r_ '+, t� Z. .�L A •f6 mss . _ .i y�' } '� �' r �' •4 h •�l.t-� Jf~ .S.>� *af'q 1•� r . _ :8►�x"') "�` - "�*,,..r..;� /'+ � Jam.- .,�^ s-�.-r,• '.: ) A.4�` ��.� -iV, ."' �'�:'�`�, .'L^" .iy.. r.. \- \.'7 si-r,�(,' `. _.4 i0 i", ..•i\.,I`,'-.:�l.'-�.. �R.`r.+�' •a.'4.. ,r r�..,.y'�' �_ •i �. .� .'�• �.�, �� ti,� •r/r. _i'r+ ,r4�df r,�..'•� VW �>•: •yp� r r �• y� :r. .a --4r ����. K ,•*,i -''� .t',s"'i. � ,. i+i' '-•vi �j « '�,� F �'S; 7' -_.� 7 �r �.�Z' i. 'i i � .)• "17e " - �:1:- �-j". YL'y.. A •S..n w r r ^� ' ♦ - .;'ir ` 4.1E ,x � '7, tg� � i .+f• _ ,,: � �, `'. iS .����, ' (-^ " :,'f.F . tir r; �' i- t,.,,a ♦j «:• y F rc ,, `, s �.. t ry ♦` • r'� � s l O' ��� {'o 'ti' � - �_, •r�:° >i .� ,,.N « ,r�°a �Y,s'P•' '• y ®:i • °i �"i' •� '' i..a; .�♦ .,�X`r,' ',ti*r �., ? �. ` ► .>;" y�`'4^, .�xF �' :';� w 2Z` �_,oyC a :f � YO•- � 0��� al's •�, ��a►i�� .+�' �t�iy1�.�; .�' .�� '1( - y��' `\ a'. � nim s! • \ \ ' ��� 'a�v 7� �T.s' ��i �h 1 V �. Jl •AC'S- •�� h-A';v�'. �r �` a''♦*y 7- i� t ;if I` ...• ; �1['. /.. •• . • Yr►•.�IPA, : , -•y .via ;alb_ h r� `!, )v•`1�.F �'F �' V r*•if'. c �A O _ ..Y,s,♦ e; tiW'- t'y,'.a�i.�7'�'�J' •�• 1�. ♦, .�►••'�`f, �Ya7> _�1:ft:"V^a^`:''s }�:•f '� °���. -�' r •� to ..'tL' ��fr• t.. �• ;•int' '. ,'•ti'r" �5+ 1"�1 •'r �'S _ ��•'r�. aY•+ .i .J'� - t ..r r"t' 4 ('�}. rs.Jt'•' 4:`Ylr;,+,^��°'�ip. 'Y ��-,i�� � Y? a �� "'� -.�.� "�^ �'l �"` �•2� .,'YI .� ./ +.• t._t`.. '�.,- -. ' t'H iE +?�`� ,- ' \i �V- �°T� ,7s �F�S': YjT � • r : ;, 'tcw. % �,•,y` a '•i�.Ji� t sem. ��`� �t'� i ~ R ,ry' G t`•� .� .r .b(, _s i v >W,'ry �1jr►, '�� 'S.. .ttr•L .�sy��r r Z-yYi►• • � �� �i• T y.! ) � ^j."•, �� '.c'• !'": �: � t R `�" r•-'�'s{-�'��� � 3j �. i .,��� ,�• ♦.i.. »t '' 7!• rt � ,' ,{7NA� Al �L1 M J'� ''-ta'y;t�a•" T ' iil:i1.:' 1. ''a �S•�, 'z 0._ .� p!�:""�-���- ' ,i • ry'���L"-" •-���. �� .+'-^ :�• _ ' •.& `��. e-: • i :_, ri Y�"'�� t � •t `�j:.' ' +%a'" `°�i� •r: to :t�^' . ' .�r .� rr - ra.r' -. �M -." . Nt C :.N i7. t� • '. I'�' }` .ii1...D.��a.q •F _ 9;,; �,�y,z ,�-r• r .�`.. - 4a •_ y 'a♦ " s, r?r �: F ' •'' ` 4!'1��4«u;t`�� ��'t� ` `:"�.' A7_ _ ♦ _ h - '•1 _ '� 11 �' � t ��1 N i,�. i `�JY:�-Y M,. "S ,�T •N )> J� is ,,i r : e �y7 ".: • �♦ � if.. •` '�:, �" � • -. " "' _ _ _ ..tit. "4 ,d .1-tr_ �•JL.'c'a •.,.. •��`� C . • 4._ r .r:. • �i•{i,. Vii• .. - . ... . . . . .. . - .. .� ' .. .......wrac.:n....a•�rw..•u..ia....+�n+rr.a:.w•eu....« ..,. ... . . ..... .. .. . .. .... ,. ....._ ... iislNiWgMWi�r.'ti.�r . ,' aYt%Yrf�w��.�wiM+.•1M,a•s.Yw.�. �u w+W�wnIWYY.W+w+wF r►UrwN:rwea • . •.• ..` .. ... _ ..!>.. .,....... ....... .... ,.....a, �+< t♦.... t.Ys�-�_._�: mow."__. +uii'•.ill�Ra �.Wirfw'.:—"—.....Lfr�lla..L.w✓+�GY.•aL••�•1•hMwa •.. .+.ei-r :.1:.—��i(ifi'Li'a. 1L�8•;�.:LH.'tiw .: . -•i'•iN�RM.G!M.4�i�NA�s.N•�T.•va4itAY �•:Cw..a.u..✓... u...s4:.a.. ... .. ..... ...,:L.. ,.-.....•.. .. • 1 FERNDALE ST. EXISTING STORM SEWER C cn B ' rn At I 22 i rn � A 2 21 2 LOW AREA 20 3 3 BLOCK 6 .h rn 19 4 r- v LOW h zv �2,, PROP ST SEWER 4 161 ,p BLOCK 5 . i 8 5 rn ,A o f .5 LOW �z•• 17 GERANIUM ST. 6 MAPLEWOOD9 MINNESOTA 7 COMM• NO. 9136 - ____ STORM SEWS R 8 w l00 200 SCALE=1 =100• FIGURE NO. 2 * .. � . - �. � � .. • • n � w • .. ' 1w. ol.-wM•� ..w_. �•--. w•�. -1r• w�r...www F ...... ..1N•*� 4 Revocation of Permit (Hause) PLEASE NOTE: G-3 Action by Council:, Endors e d .....� .�.;w�� Mo d i i' Rejected. -- Date -- Councilmember Bastian has contacted the neighbors regarding the.revocation of this permit. He will report his findings at this meeting. MEMORANDUM Action by Council: Endorsed -- TO: City Manager Modif I ed FROM.: Director of Community Development Reje'eted...".. SUBJECT: Variances and Variations Dat DATE: July 3, 1989 t Variances and variations were discussed by the Council on June .22. Council asked for an example of each and the advantages and disadvantages, The differences between a variance from Chapter 36 in City Code on zoning and a variation from Chapter 30 on subdivisions are ex . plained in the attached memo of June 19. As an example, Chapter 30 on subdivisions requires that newly divided corner lots have 100 feet of width. Chapter 36 on zoning does not require 100 feet of width for a corner lot. Chapter 36 on zoning only requires a lot width of at least 75 feet at the building setback I ine. Therefore , a request, to sub -divide a corner I of with E35 feet of frontage would require a variation, but no variance. A request to subdivide a corner lot with 73 feet of frontage would require both a variance and a variation. The findings for a variance are more restrictive than findings for a variation. Therefore, it is more diff i c u l t to get: approval of a variance. On the other hand , it is more d i f + icul t to deny a vagi at ion . . Since the findings for a variance are mandated by state law, they .Cannot be changed. Therefore, if Council wishes to make a change, Chapter 30 on, subdivisions would have to be amended to change the term "variation" to "variance" and require the findings for a variance. RECOMMENDATION Initiate a code amendment to substituting "variance" for findings for a variance. it var&var.mem Section 30-11 of City . Code , "variation" and requiring the MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Variances and Variations .TE: ' June 19, 1989 Councilmember Juker asked at the last -meeting for an explanation ' of the difference between variances ,and variations from the Code. Both variances and variations are deviations from the requirements of the Code. A deviation from the zoning chapter is called a variance. A deviation from the subdivision chapter is called a variation. There are separate findings required to approve each one. The findings for a variance are determined by State law. Section 367.10, subdivision 6(2) of State law requires that the following findings be made before a variance to the zoning chapter can be granted: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. ' 2, The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Un|ue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his Property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. There are no findings required in State law to approve a variation from the subdivision chapter. In this case, findings are detennined by City Code and are found in section 30-11: "The planning commission may recommend variations from the requirements of this chapter (subdivisions) in specific cases which, in its opinion, do not affect the general plan or the intent of this chapter. Such recommendations shall be communicated to the council in writing, substantiating the recommended variations. The council may approve variations from the requirements of this chapter in specific cases which, in its opinion, do not adversely affect the plan and spirit of this chapter." If Council finds the use of these two terms confusing, they should initiate a code amendment to change the word "variations" in section 30-11 to "variances". The difference in names is only important in drawing attention to the fact that different findings are required for each. As you can see from the above, the findings for a variation from the subdivision chapter are much less str i ngent than +or a variance +rom the zoning chapter. Council may wish to have one set o+ f i nd ing s +or% both. In this case, t hey should initiate an amendment o+ section 30-11 to require the same + hidings. +or� a variation +r om the subd ivisioi••� chapter a are r�equ i r ed + or� a var� i ance from the zoning chapter . MEM06 MEMORANDUM TO City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Off-street Parking DATE: June 19, 1989 INTRODUCTION` Action by X Endorsed,~__~_~ ~"~dif^� The recent variance application for 3M brought a problem with the City's parking design requirements to Dur at-tention - stall sizes are top large for employee parking and too small for high turnover uses, such as retail stores. DISCUSSION Several changes have been proposed to the parking design standards, based on the standards of the Institute of Transportation Engineers for mid-size cars. The major change is in regard to parking stall si zes. Public parking st all widths have been increased from half nine -foot and half ten -foot -wide stalls to ten feet for high turnover uses and 9.5 feet for low tutrnover uses. Employee spaces have been decreased to nine feet Stall lengths have b 0 been reduced from 2to 18 feet. The current requirement has proven confusing for developers and resulted in insufficient width. The wider width is particularly important for high turnover uses, such as retail , where people need to open their car doors wider to get packages in. On the other hand, employee parking is for longer periods of time and a narrower width is acceptable. When this ordinance was given first reading on June 8, Councilmember Juker questioned whether apartments should be considered high turnover uses, such as retail centers. Based on the standards of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, apartments would generate significantly less traffic per acre than retail centers. A high density apartment project on one acre in Maplewood (17.9 units/acre) would generate an average of 99 trips each day. A retail center on one acre would generate from 268-787 trips each day, depending on the size of the center. Apartments, therefore, should be considered a low turnover use. Approve the attached ordinance. Pel EMO12 Attachment: Ordinance ORDINANCE NON .AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITYS PARKING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (additions are underl i ned and del et ions crossed out) Section 1. Section 36-22 (b) is amended to read as follows: (b) The following minimum ----- arking--module dimensions shall be r.eguired NN. 90 degree park: -ing- (in. feet) Refer to - diagram below .S El S D . A Use. Stal I width Stal I I en2th Aisl e width customer h-igh ----- turnover 10 18 24 15u6 Customer, -1 ow turnover 9u5 18 24 22 Employee only 980 18 24 60 decgree park in (in feet) - Refer to. diagram- -bel ow .S El A Use Stal I width Stal I I en.9-th Aisl e width Customer. - --high turnover 10 15u6 22 -Customer, low turnover 9v5 15u6 22 Employee only 940 15w6 22 45 d eSLree p ark i n 9 ---- ..(in +eet) - Re+er to dia2ram below 0 1= S 031 S 00 t E S c 60 D=18' A D=18 D 0-1• A D 900 Parking 600 and 450 Parking Parking stall lengths may be reduced by .5 feet for 90 degree parking and two feet for angle park ing where I the parking space abuts a curb --.--sidewalk or landscaped area. All overhang. (o) areas shall be.a hard surface or crushed rock. "Customer. high turnover" uses shall include p i n-gshon centers - retail sal es.- fust food restaurants-,_ convenience centers and NNN similar uses. "Customer low turnover" uses shall include o++ ices, industrial school --s.,,,- churches. research , mul t ipl e- dwellin2s, motel -s, ----sit-down restaurants and similar uses. An questions on def inin these uses shall be referred to the Community Desi -2n Review Board for a dec*I sion. Empl-pyee---park: ing-with reduced stall widths must be sisi!]ed for MNWM employee park in2- onl-y-,_ meta- degree-parit fmg- Spec es-sh a 4-+-b Le p+e-dwe++f mgsv --A++ ot-her- Spec es;- fMc+"d+Mg-Mf S D 'A Use. Stal I width Stall length Aisl e width Customer.- h-igh turnover 10 1.. 22n6. Customer. 1 ow turnover 9w5 12e6 22w6 Employee only 900 12w6 22w6 0 1= S 031 S 00 t E S c 60 D=18' A D=18 D 0-1• A D 900 Parking 600 and 450 Parking Parking stall lengths may be reduced by .5 feet for 90 degree parking and two feet for angle park ing where I the parking space abuts a curb --.--sidewalk or landscaped area. All overhang. (o) areas shall be.a hard surface or crushed rock. "Customer. high turnover" uses shall include p i n-gshon centers - retail sal es.- fust food restaurants-,_ convenience centers and NNN similar uses. "Customer low turnover" uses shall include o++ ices, industrial school --s.,,,- churches. research , mul t ipl e- dwellin2s, motel -s, ----sit-down restaurants and similar uses. An questions on def inin these uses shall be referred to the Community Desi -2n Review Board for a dec*I sion. Empl-pyee---park: ing-with reduced stall widths must be sisi!]ed for MNWM employee park in2- onl-y-,_ meta- degree-parit fmg- Spec es-sh a 4-+-b Le p+e-dwe++f mgsv --A++ ot-her- Spec es;- fMc+"d+Mg-Mf *a+ -_A++~ by-access-a+sfes. 0f-thc-fof+ewinq ' (z) 'fdf- All parking Iots, shall have continuous concrete curbing c BUrrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. Park parking lots, that are not used in the winter, and parking lots having twelve (12) spaces or less are exempt from this requirement, unless required by the city engineer for drainage control., (d)fef All parking lots shall be continually and properly maintained. (e) f++ All parking lots and associated driveways shall have a hard sVrfacee of bituminous or concrete. All parking spaces shall be marked with a +our -inch -wide "hairpin" striping pattern. (-f) The City -.-may reguire a ten-+oot-wide planter or median strip every --three or four park ing.--bays- to prevent hiSih-speed movement dj.a9onall__y______acrosS the parkin!3 lot and to improve esthetics.-, (Refer to diaSiram below.) |4(31 () 0 0 Or,? 0 0 0 0 00 t|5 --mi / / 1-1--i /I V IS) Landscaped divider 1�0 510 � logo 1 0 MENEM ON � parking- closest to the build-ing shall. be oriented with the parkin2- drives p-erpendicular to the building +ace whenever (h) Parking stalls shall not be allowed in +ront--o+ a buildin Lmntrance,, i+ there is no sidewal'k in +rant a+ the buildi (i) Interlocking or "herringbone" designs shall not be allowed in public parking lots. (Re+er to the +ollowinq diagram. I 4 &�Wwwm , 43 Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes 6-13-89 ' lanting l 1 , 80��' from the e west _ edge ' all ./r. DESIGN A~ Sign Plan Revie Western Bank 1740 Rice Street. was present at the mr:-3,et i rig Mr. Prcha- said this; proposed miqn was reqUested L)` se it ult Lo identify the building w n approac ing f rom the north. Holder move approvc-_Al of the sign plan, dated M 19, 1989, for oposed wall siqn on tl-ie no herly elevation o the Western Bank Bu ld . ` Boadmember Anitzberger secor ed Ayes --all Be Parking Code Amendment Boardmember Anitzberger moved the Review Board recommend approval of the amended parking ordinance for off-street parkinq. The Board recommends, though, that the lannuage pprmittinq 8.5-4-oot (:-tall widths be deleted from the proposrd amrndment. .. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes --all VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS X. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at _ --- Endorse' ' -''--- ` Modifl T[]: CityManager Rejected. - FROM: ' Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Dat SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoninci - LOCATION: S. W. Corner of County Road C and Duluth Street APPLICANT: Goff Homes Inc. OWNER: Rehbein~Husnick Development Co. PROJECT: Goff's Mapleview 2nd Addition DATE: June 14, 1989 ` SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting approval of: 1. A Comprehensive Plan amendment from SC, service commercial center to RM, residential medium density. 2. Arezoning from R1, single -dwelling residence district to R3, multiple dwelling district. Description of the Project The proposed development consists of two 6 -unit condominium buildings ("manor homes") on a 1.18 acre parcel (Lot 1, Block 2) . 1. The plan amendment is requested because the SC designation does not allow the construction of condominiums. 2" The rezoning is required as the site is currently zoned R1 single family residential and the construction of 12 condominium units requires an R3, multiple dwelling zoning. BACKGROUND On August 7, 1980, the Maplewood City Council approved Goff's Mapleview PUD subject to a number of conditions. This approval,, however, did not include Lot 2 (the parcel now in question). It was felt at` that time that the "frontage" road (Duluth Street) should serve as a divide between the commercial development to the west and the residential land to the east. Since residential uses were initially proposed by the applicant for this lot, it was not included in the 1.980 PUD approval* CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL There are no''specific criteria for a plan amendment decision. Changes in the land use plan should be consistent with the g'oals, policimss and obi ectives in the City's comprehensive plan. Section 36-4,85 of the City Code requires that the approval of a rezoning shall be based upon four findings. (Refer to the findings in the resolution on page 16). DISCUSSION Land Use Transition This property is currently designated SC, Service Commercial in the land -use plan. This land -use designation is intended for commercial activities which function on a local or community -wide 'scale" A wide variety of commercial facilities are permitted in this district, provided that the proposal is compatible with the character and development of the neighborhood in which it is located. In review of the site and the surrounding land uses, staff has some reservations about the suitability of commercial development on this corner.Allowing this property to be used for commercial activities, while there are single-family homes on all sides, would probably cause more disruption and negative impacts for the residences than would the proposed residential development. One of the reasons that this parcel was not included in Goff -s PUD was that the City felt that Duluth Street would serve as a dividing point between the commercial land uses to the west and residential land uses to the east. While using a street as a dividing point for different land uses may be appropriate in some locations, it does not appear to be the best alternative in this portion of the City. The policies in the City's land use plan states that: "Changes in types of land use shall occur at center, mid -block points, so that similar uses front on the same street...". The proposal to construct 12 condominium units in this location is consistent with this design objective, as similar uses would end up fronting on Duluth Street and a land use changsn would ocCur at a mid -block point along County Road C. One of the concerns expressed by the nearby property owners with this proposal is the traffic that it will generate. The 1987 average daily traffic count for County Road C east of Highway 61 was 3300 vehicles. According to the Ramsey County Public Works department, this volume of traffic is below the functional capacity of the road. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) estimates that 1.18 acres of suburban condominium development will generate 73 trips per day on average. The ITE estimates that 1.18 acres of suburban office development will generate 352 vehicle trips per day on average. Thus it appears that the existing road system can, handle the level of expected traffic from the condominium proposal and the amount of traffic thattheproposal would generate is significantly less than would be generated by office development on the site. ' RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the resolution on page 15, which amends the land use plan.from SC to RM.Approval is based on the fbllowing findings: a. This parcel appears to be well suited for medium density residential development and the proposal is consistent with Comprehensive Plan development policy for having changes in land uses at mid -block and for having similar uses fronting the same street. b. This project would have no adverse effect on surrounding properties: (1) The condominiums will have screening on all sides with the proposed vegetation thus minimizing the visual impacts of the buildings to nearby homes. (2) There would be no adverse effect on adjacent property values attributable to the proposed multiple dwellings. In addition, the Ramsey County Assessor's office has stated that it is possible that residential properties directly adjacent to commercial development may not increase in value as quickly as those lots that are farther away. C. They traffic that would be generated by the proppsal can be adequately accommodated by the existing street 2. Approve the resolution on page 16 approving the rezoning of the property in question on the basis that the four required findings of fact would be met. 3 ' ` CITIZEN COMMENTS Citv.staff surveyed 40 property owners within 350 feet of the site. Of the 19 replies, one was in favor, one had no comment, and 17 were opposed" The principal objections were: 1. Goff's first Project is not finished. 2. Goff had made promises that similar types of housing units would be built on the remainder of his property. 3. It will decrease property values in the area. Staff reply: See attached memorandum on page 13. 4, It will increase the possibility of crimes because of the lower-income families. 5. The buildings would be too large for the area. Staff reply: All City ordinance requirements for setbacks, building height and overall density would be met with the proposal. 6. I object to rental property. 7. There already is too much traffic on County Road C. Staff reply: This concern is addressed on page 3 of the report. 8. I would like to see the natural habitat preserved. 9. The added demands to the local utility systems may be too much of a burden on those systems. Staff reply: Adequate streets, sanitary sewer and water serve the property in question for the proposal. 10. There is a lack of recreation areas in the neighborhood (children are playing in the streets). Staff reply: According to the Parks and Recreation Director, no additional parks are planned for this area of the City. Existing parks are located at County Road C and Cypress Street (Kohlman Lake Park) and at Hazelwood Avenue and Barclay Street (Harvest Park). 11. I chose this area to get away from apartment -type dwellings. 4 ~ REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION ' The subJect property is 1.19 acres with approximately 425 feet of frontage on Duluth Street and 188°32 feet of frontage on County _ Road C. The subject property is undevelopedand has an area of higher ground along the west property line. There is a mix of vegetation an the site includingscrub and mature trees and shrub -type plants.. SURROUNDING LANEI USES Immediately to the west of the subject property there is a single- family dwelling.' Farther to the west there are three other single- family hompsand Lakeview Lutheran Church. To the southwest, behind the single-family homes, is the site on which is proposed a one-story office building for the headquarters of Rainbow Cleaning Systems. Directly to the south of the site is Duluth Street, Edgehill Court and Phase Three of the Maoleview PUD. Duluth Street is also immediately to the east oft-he ��ubiect property. Farther to the east of the subject property are Phases One and Two of Goff -s PUD. To the north of the site is County Road C and single-family homes on the north side of the road. PAST ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommended, on July 16, 1979, approval of a plan amendment for the realignment of the Highway 61 "frontage" road. The Commission also recommended that the plan should reflect the separation of land uses by the road alignment. The City Council approved the above amendments on July 19, 1979. The Council also held a hearing at this time on the proposed Highway 61 frontage road and English Street. Council ordered English Street as a cul-de-sac but took no action on the frontage road . Goff's Mapleview PUD and the commencing of building on the three lots along County Road C were approved in 1980. The PUD approval , however, did not include the subject property as the proposal for residential development on it was not consistent with the land use plan. Phase Two of Goff -s PUD (around Hilltop Court) and Phase Three (around Edgehill Court) have subsequently been approved. 5 MrRXiMUmallowed density: 22people/net acre Project density: 21.69 people/net acre. Land Use Pol icies. Land use plan` designation: SC, service commercial center. An amendment to RM, residential medium density has been requested. TheRM land use classification is designed for single-family homes on small lots, duplexes, townhouses, and mobile homes. The proposed project is in compliance with Maplewood's Comprehensive Plan housing balance and mix policies for the following reasons: 1, The comprehensive plan states: "The City shall encourage transitional land uses, with medium and higher -density residential development located between low-density residential and commercial or service land uses." The proposed site serves as a transition between the commercial/manufacturing land uses to the southwest and west, and the lower density residential areas to the north and east. 2. In Section 74-5, comprehensive plan policy should. . . "Accomplish transition between distinctly different types of residential land uses in an orderly fashion to avoid creating a negative (economic, social or physical) impact on adjoining developments." Conflicts are minimized between single-family residences to the east and west and the proposed multi -family housing because of changes in site topography and the applicant's own proposal for additional berming, screening and buffering. 3. In Section 74-9, comprehensive plan policy states that the City shall utilize the following: . "Residential neighborhoods shall be protected from encroachment or intrusion of nonresidential uses by adequate buffering and/or separation." �01 The existing residential character of this area will be further enhanced by the addition of more housing units. This will help prevent further intrusion from as well as the negative impacts of commercial or manufacturing development which are conceivable land uses for this parcel with the SC land use designation. 4. In Section 74-12, "High-density residential areas.should be located adjacent to or in close proximity to collectors ' and arterials." The applicant's proposal can be considered medium -density residential development. Even as such, it is important to note that the site is located adjacent to a collector street (County Road C) and is in close proximity to a principal arterial (Highway 61). HousiDa Goals There are two criteria for evaluating a project against the City's housing goals - affordability and diversity. Affordability: 1. The housing plan calls for the provisionof 620 new housing units to be made available to low -to -moderate income people between 1980 and 1990. Low -to -moderate income is defined as affordable for households that earn 80 percent or less of the area median income. In 1988, the area median income for a family of four was $40,700. As of October 31, 19887 888 new low -to -moderate income housing units had been made available in Maplewood. The excess of 268 units has been applied to the City's modest cost housing goal that is described below. 2. The housing plan also calls for the provision of 785 new housing units to be made available to modest -income households between 1980 and 1990. Modest income is defined as affordable for households that earn 110 percent or less of the area median income. As of October 31, 19889 411 new modest -cost units had been made available in Maplewood. These units, together with the excess low -to -moderate income units, leave 106 additional modest cost units to be provided in Maplewood by 1990" 7 Housing Diversity: The housing goals and objectives in the comprehensive plan state: 1. "The City should continue to encourage and plan for a wide variety of housing types"" 20 "The City should continue to use planning principles for housing areas which encourage planned and developed open These goals should be accompanied by a policy of planning for a certain percentage of the City's housing stock to be something other than singlewfamily dwellings. In 1985, the Metropolitan Council adopted a goal that called for each metro area. communit\, to plan for about 41 percent of its housing units to be something other than sing1e-family dwellings. As of September 8, 1988, 35,6 percent of Maplewood's housing units were nonsingle family dwellings. If the City were to be fully developed under its present land use plan, about 44 percent of Maplewood's housing unitswould be something other than single-family dwellings. Thepremises for this policy is that the long-term stability of the community's tax base depends, in large part, upon its ability to attract and retain residents of all ages. To do so, a diversity of housing styles must be available to accommodate households in each stage of the life cycle of housing n«seds. In summary, this project is consistent with City housing policies encouraging a diversity of housing types. f d �o pu amen Attachments 1" Land Use Plan 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Staff Memo on Property Values 6. Plan Amendment Resolution 7. Rezoning Resolution 'Poo [SC_. —Service Commercial RM —Medium Density Residential M. —Municipal Facility RL —Low Density Residential LAND USE PLAN LSC —Limited Service Commercial OS —Open Space .• P —Park BW —Business Warehouse i .-MMMOOMM00 mom I f al am !MM C — Church 9 Attachment 1 :. GQFF' ,APLEV1EW.- ADD. r• ' ��� tA ` ?5- • 75, ' '75 *. N O A c& a 1f �-- #i a .•o. 4 �. _ of 010 t t o •`-s� Q ;'' Lutheran ti s. _ 93 140 Church 3a� til• • �1 '' . �� ;��-i p' r Wit- 2oa s.. H Pro o s e d ::- � • • Q' °° ��.�, RainbolwP •• r ' .4 ca 3cc *218Z 0 I 4 Q '► do Q Q `7' r 1 IIJ oil) Ir 7 It t 0 5 9 tom► {%©� .�'♦�, j , ;r +► 7 ? 2 Z S r.^ 1 t w -r4. l s• ��� 44.1 .� 11x1 f3C + t� % . , • ?` 9 tT D JA ., 1715 4 i b 3s i 1403CP Oil 14 -G0NN0R --- -AVE � _ y p�a�Ft3L .x IZ� t a. � 3RD' D p too- , 90 ► ; .- C,• ' 'VSs '940 OUTLOT A .� hi WEA •— a► - - - • S o t 72 3 lam, 14 ,,g v y f .•� PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP R-1 — Single—dwelling residential PUD — Planned Unit Development — — ig u ac urin 10 Attachment 2 ' 1 ' NM 47 (A N'T Y F?oA d G • 1 • x 1 1 i KAWK- a 9464T 0 vWiw hN4 -- "IDACS LoT t7tvtooN wHO. u. � its Y. `.. ,,, � . tr � � � I p}�q.v�ti(s WPt•4. IkM .: :. �►s ` � / � � 3 � 6tt�f GHrfERr.taC • � - ..- •— -- • � '' ! ! }--� irKit►1(s' Std sGWGx i ( 1 • `� ` t' r0-- �-- — i1t►STirYi tlt7�•1 SEtR � , Er �s11►ali CQNTON � , � • ' .� � �� � � ` _ � '^4i>!4 — rte' �+'�,vx�` 1 v eA +� . moi' r G7�► t�J.ri1�1 I01 WP Th I 4' Ns st:wt� I •. � ' M.� NoMs � ANN idtV. j /�1 �.MM a000un< Ai fof ��; ' . w�wrs sr • •. /,, �spsfs %IiRC 13LOGK 1 Z4. �'/I � I ' M r+OP�11► Aa/W±� ^yid/ !nr / r L. aT aNg w Z4 • ag& of " �, . �, . •,� r . L4 T1No v Z-7. b45 jF o, t.3 ,AC J' • • . -,p• � V Tpf/(. DwCt.L.rN(� uNtTti IZ vN• so.,(' • • • '� . ' �. NGT PSM41M 010.2 ON •. • . j moo, � �t � -A*-- g!!2 JOLN*r MM r� aw• -'� �� � �.�i.8 �N��l4�•O� • i ! �o •o i •tNr rf /b•+O tOrG�f•�►PN'! qy M►u+ii� w G►�.i I I Asca. jJ&V rN. MW'! w -Sr r.•Wu. , MN 55112 (vrZ) 4b4- 3;01 ' • f��� HER9456f C,�T)f•f TKAf TNIAf PLAM WA4 ta4PAAer7 Pr► MO "Ar �► pR HNCCR. M'1 Otatvf ftAlfOPL KiOM AW S NM fidGr9t D t w"t?V. ft f►RGMIT=T Lfur;e TlHd L- W6 CO r" STkrs Or MtNNe4ora . rza& No I?A31 eo SITE PLAN 11 Attachment 3 COOLA % M /► i D1f6A r1 1 P IO T M Is R L D _ lop r : '� ► 1 y i fi f • �noWt�r� ' ' �� � ' � � L' 3 uD SRgNcut JA- ' a f sn+wcs fo&ui SpIcrAC$ ; ;. i uNG6N VW / \ GAS i !'i0pcwv►•I " i I 'Dt�fis A4M NOM .;•,,.. � ' �� � ro ga sowev . 1 4eW4 Gd - (. A SPI�NG6 1 • �y/1{,•Iy G*'#. SGM.B l �• �.p• p s IS IV r�rR' MArEaI,�► gist a�u►rl. GLMr+or+ r�uN� AorAt+1 a•K.�+�►H� ___ - - rte_ _ h+eS'._ _ _ .. A i31�+K.K�t �l.�s SPPir� PI G 6r•` C�'�' OErS�fI� �s • Pt+� GOU.O�►G�7 9w14 6PA1GQ ASIA PI,rNb/t•►4 GI,I► ► lo' 605 1514WAFr:' NOR4VAy PING PiNN4 EtEsimC$^ g' R9 G UmLoior 4poApvlrAfv .rMW^ acf00,M•ra4A5► 4' ISR (� Rad spt,iNCt�rt 1�t.�+s "vev SFLJNPCOR I �t 0 oR �pnrP+Nrsa; �} 4NOW00lit GPWa. Mot.N4 " SNCPWCU Or j. ROyA.,Tl CPA* M^444IF1""OvTf 0 1 Yt wS ►� 3 (sMgW M114. SNbAR eAOW A4019 SAaM Al44H •6Of&►j MM•'• 2Yt • � 4rA+�•C Wrtl•E�� w1400 T1WA WPVA1r• M Zvo OA Z M°I�SHIk1•V: S�Dl.fi'K /KN FriA�INNs }ANN lAAACI. Mo►00046, ZVI set AIS 3 1 NX t..�0�r� o�PPE Fi-AN 12 Attachment 4 4 N G o N N T Y R �''. d' G COOLA % M /► i D1f6A r1 1 P IO T M Is R L D _ lop r : '� ► 1 y i fi f • �noWt�r� ' ' �� � ' � � L' 3 uD SRgNcut JA- ' a f sn+wcs fo&ui SpIcrAC$ ; ;. i uNG6N VW / \ GAS i !'i0pcwv►•I " i I 'Dt�fis A4M NOM .;•,,.. � ' �� � ro ga sowev . 1 4eW4 Gd - (. A SPI�NG6 1 • �y/1{,•Iy G*'#. SGM.B l �• �.p• p s IS IV r�rR' MArEaI,�► gist a�u►rl. GLMr+or+ r�uN� AorAt+1 a•K.�+�►H� ___ - - rte_ _ h+eS'._ _ _ .. A i31�+K.K�t �l.�s SPPir� PI G 6r•` C�'�' OErS�fI� �s • Pt+� GOU.O�►G�7 9w14 6PA1GQ ASIA PI,rNb/t•►4 GI,I► ► lo' 605 1514WAFr:' NOR4VAy PING PiNN4 EtEsimC$^ g' R9 G UmLoior 4poApvlrAfv .rMW^ acf00,M•ra4A5► 4' ISR (� Rad spt,iNCt�rt 1�t.�+s "vev SFLJNPCOR I �t 0 oR �pnrP+Nrsa; �} 4NOW00lit GPWa. Mot.N4 " SNCPWCU Or j. ROyA.,Tl CPA* M^444IF1""OvTf 0 1 Yt wS ►� 3 (sMgW M114. SNbAR eAOW A4019 SAaM Al44H •6Of&►j MM•'• 2Yt • � 4rA+�•C Wrtl•E�� w1400 T1WA WPVA1r• M Zvo OA Z M°I�SHIk1•V: S�Dl.fi'K /KN FriA�INNs }ANN lAAACI. Mo►00046, ZVI set AIS 3 1 NX t..�0�r� o�PPE Fi-AN 12 Attachment 4 4 N MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: The Effect of Multiple Dwellings on Adjacent Single -Dwelling Home Values DATE: February 7, 1985. Whenever a hearing for a multiple dwelling adjacent to single dwellings is held, neighbors always argue that their property values will . deprec i ate. To question this belief is like arguing against motherhood or apple. pie. In order to separate fact from myth, I have done some research. The following is a list of the only studies I could find in. the metro area: 1. The City of Coon Rapids (1978-81 data) --city assessor This study compares the sales ratio (assessor's value/average actual sales price) of single dwellings over the whole city versus single dwellings adjacent to apartments, double dwellings and home occupations. The result is that there was no significant difference in the value of homes. 2. The City of Brooklyn Center (1982-83 data) --city assessor This is a similar study to that done in Coon Rapids. This study also found no significant- difference in the value of single dwellings adjacent to multiple dwellings versus the average value of single dwellings city- wide. ' ity- wide.. It is interesting to note that , parks had a slightly negative effect on adjacent home values. 3. A study by the Bosclair Corporation for the City of Bloomington (1960-70 sales data from Bloomington, New Hope, St. Louis Park and Edina) This study shows that homes adjacent to multiple dwellings had a slightly higher value it 4. A study by North Star Appraisal for the City of Savage (1980 sales data from Apple Valley and Burnsville) This study was based on the effect of quad developments on adjacent single dwellings. This study also found that there was no adverse effect on the property values of adjacent homes. There was also no increase in marketing time. A survey of -adjacent homeowners found a posi ti ve attitude toward the quads. Homeowners did not feel the projects reduced their property values, polluted their vision or increased the number of undesirables in the neighborhood. 13 Attachment 5 5. A study by Lafayette and. Ri erce, Inc.--real estate appraisers for Castle Design and Deve-1 opment Co. (1984) This study is based on a proposed eight-building,64-unit apartment development in Maplewood called Sterling Glen. This study found that the apartments would not be a deterrent to the overall marketability or value of adjacent homes. 'Conclusion Council should not base denial of a multiple dwelling project on the negative effect on ad jaceft property values, unless there is something specific about a project that differentiates it from multiple dwellings in general. Available studies do.not show a negative effect on property values or marketing time of adjacent homes. cc Council Planning commission HRA CDRB Associate planners 14 PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Goff Homes, Inc. initiated an amendment to the Maplewood lComprehensive Plan from SC, service commercial to RM, residential medium density +or the +allowing -described property: This property is more comconli, described as Lot 1Block 2, Goff~s Maplewood 2nd Addition. ' WHEREAS, the procedural history af this p1em amendment is as fallowsx ' `1.The Maplewood Planning Commission held apublic hearing on , 1989, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were Igiven an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the Cit)/ Council that said plan amendment be . 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on , 1989. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described plan amendment be on the basisof the fallowing findings af fact: 1. The parcel appears to bewell suited for medium density residential development serving as atransition area between land uses. 2. The site is located adjacent to a minor arterial street. 3. The project will have no adverse effect on surrounding Adopted this day of , 1989. Seconded by Ayes -- 16 Attachment 6 _ PUrsuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of The +ol lowing members were present: The +oYlowing members were absent: WHEREAS, 8off Homes, Inc, initiated a rezoning from R-1* single to R-3, multiple-dwel1ing res ident ial for the following -described property: � ' Lot 1, Block 2, Go++ -s Mapleview 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: .' 1. This rezoning was initiated by Goff Homes, Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commissionon , 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be ~ 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on v 1989 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and. mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements" The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2.The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded' 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the communityv where applicable and the public we1fare " 16 Attachment 7 4^ The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical v e+ficient, and economical extension afpublic services and, facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted this day of , 1989. Seconded by Ayes-- STATEOF MINNESOTACOUNTY ) OF RAMSEY ) SS. ' ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) ' I, the undersigned, being. the duly qua]ified and appointed Clerk of the' Cit. o+ Maplewood' Minnesota,� do hereby certify that I have carefully compared theattached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 1989 with the original on +ile in my office, and the sanow* is a fulltrue and complete* 'transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning. ' Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1989. City Clerk City o+ Maplewood 17 0 ' MINUTES OF THE MAPL EWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY -ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA • JONF 19, 1989 I. CALL. TO ORDER Cha n► man Axdah1 called the meeting to or er at 7:30 p.m. II. ROLL. C L Commissio er Lester Axdahl Present C n�mi ss ion Michael Ayers Present Commissioner Richard Barrett Present Commissioner b ert Cardinal Present Commissioner Sc. Fiol a. Present Commissioner Lor aine Fischer Present Commissioner Denn ' s Larson Present Commissioner Mary i Sigmund ' : present Commissioner Ralph etten Absent IIIn, APPROVAL OF MINUTES An June 5, 1989 Commi ss i oner F i cher oved approval of the minutes of June 5, 198 , as su i t t ed . Commissioner yers sec on d Ayes --A;: d ah 1 , Ayers, Barrett., Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer Abstentions— Larson, Sig mond i k IV. APPROVAL 0 AGENDA Comm i ss i her Barrett moved approval of t h agenda as sub m i t t Comm i i oner S i gmund i k seconded Ayes -Ax dah 1, Ayers, Barrett, Cardin , Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmund ik V . PUBLIC HEARINGS A'. Plan Amendment and Rezoning: Duluth St. 8( Co Rd. C (Goff The staff report was presented by Ken Roberts, Associate Planners r F'lanning Commission -2- Minutes 6-19-89 Pat Goff 865 Aspen Circle, Little Canadav representing the app licant g was present at the meetings Mr. Goff said that at this time, all of the units being built by the applicant are units to be sold rather khan recited Chairman A,xdahl opened the public hearing There were no comments or questions from the publics Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: Approval of the resolution which amends the land use plan from SC to RMs Approval is based on the following findings: an This parcel appears to be wet I suited for medium density residential deve)opment and the proposal is consistent with comprehensive plan development policy for having changes in land uses at mid -block and for having similar uses fronting the same street* be This project would have no adverse effect on surrounding properties: The condominiums will have screening on all sides with the proposed vegetation thus minimizing the visual impacts of the buildings to nearby homes. (2) There would be no adverse of f ect on adjacent property values attributable to the proposed multiple dwellingso c a The traf f ic that would be generated by the P roposal can be adequately accommodated by the existing street systems 2s Approval of the resolution approving the rezoning of the property in question on the. basis that the four required findings of fact would be mete Commissioner Sigmundik seconded Ayes --Ayers Barrettl Cardinal, PI ann I no r 3- Minutc.?m A, I Q—P4 Fiola, Fischerj Larsonj Sigmundik Nays--Axdahl VI VIS I\103R PRESENTATIONS VIIS NEW V I NESS Aw Co Amendment: Garage Sizes Secre ary Olson presented t staff report on the propo d changes to the ord*nan,ce regulating garage Sizes. The commissioners iscussed the history of this or inance regulating garage sizes pertaining to the size of the house an the lots Comm issio 'r Larson mov d the Planning Commission recommend proval of he ordinance regal at,inci cja.raqe size with th addition of Item (e) under Sec. 36-77 s ating.: "Column 4 shall not exceed total above --g ade s scare footage of livable floor space. Commissioner Ca nal seconded Ayes--Axdahl Ayers , Barrett s Cardinal, Fiol as Larson S i gmund i k Nays --Fischer VIII. UNFINISHED BUSIN SS H. Code Amen 7men.t: Con ditio al Use Permit The staf report was presen, ed and discussed with the com issionerse Commi ioner Ayers moved the P anning Commission recom end approval of the ordin nce amending the art le on conditional use perm s and the def ition of "conditional use" C 'Missioner Cardinal seconded es--Axdahl q A, rss, Barrett, Ca inal Fiol as Lar ns, Sigmundik Nays --Fischer Action by Council:: MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO: City Manager Modified....,. . FROMt. Director of Community Development Rejected �,..�,�....� SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit: Co.. fids D Date DATE:' march 7, 1989 The City Council , on February 27 .1 tabled a request for a Conditional use permit on County Road D and requested a history of the zoning on the land annexed from White Bear~ Lala e . . The annexation was approved. by the .Minnesota Municipal Commission April 18, 1974. It was agreed that upon completion of the annexation process, the two cities would as . near as possible establish zoning comparable to that in existence prior to the annex at ion . The previous City of White Bear Lake zoning between the Burlington Northern right -o+ -way and South l awn Drive was R-3.) multiple dwelling. The area from South l awn Drive to the east was GB, cieneral business. On August 29, 1914, the City Council approved first reading of an ordinance to rezone the land on the north side of County Road D , between the .BN railroad anti South l awn 'Drive, to R-3, multiple dwellings On September 59 1974, the City Council gave second reading to an ordinance that rezoned this property to R-3,, except for a 100 -foot strip of land that was rezoned BC , business commercial, as is currently -shown. There is no exIplanation given in the minutes for the change in the ESC zone between first and second reading. MEM05 MEM13RANIXJM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekst rand , Associate Planner 8UB JECT : Conditional Use Permit or Rezoning L.OQAT I ON: County Road D APPLICANT: W . Wal ter Coins OWNER .Jean Turner Coins PROJECT: Maple Knoll Apartments DATE: December 27, 1988 SUMMARY Introduction in The applicant is requesting approval o+ a conditional Use permit (CUP) to construct a mu 1 tip 1 e -d we H i n g comp 1 ex on property toned BC, business commercial ( the easterly 99.5 eet of the site. See page 6.) Staff is recommending a rezoning to R-3, multiple dwelling as an alternative to clean up " the zoning map. f pl ease note that the applicant's letter on page 8 describes this project as having 66 units. Since the original Submittal in August , ' the development was redesigned because the "exception" lot is no longer to be included i n the project. Findings for Approval 1. Section 36-442 (b) requires that approval of a conditional use permit be based on the following 'ken f i nd i ngs : an The use is in conformity with the City' s comprehensive plan and with the purpose and . standards of this chapter. b . The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the pub 1 i c heal th , safety or general welfare, c M The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. d. The use would not depreciate property val lie's . e. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke , dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, wet er run -o++5 vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nUisances...' r ' ' ' ' ` - f . The use would generate only minimal vehicular traf f ic on local streets and shal l not create traffic ' congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will ' cause undue burden t��. the area propert ie�� . ^ ' The use would be.serviced by essential public services, - such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, ' schools and parks . ' h. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City" in The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic Features into the development desi 9n, ~ ' j. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, ' 2. Section 36-485 requires that approval of a rezoning be based on the four findings found in the resolution on page lO . Discussion The project meets the findings for approval ofa conditional use it or re�o��rx� ��ee �� zone ��� obsolete --it has R-3 perm ~ ' multiple dwelling zones on either side and is not consistent with the RH, residential high density designation in the CitY's land l In order t� avoid future commercial use of the land, use plan. , the BC zone shou1d be rezoned toR-3. A conditional use permit would not be needed if the rezoning is approved. -Recommendat ion ` 1. Approve 'the resolution on page lOrezoning the BC zone to R-3. 2a Take no action on the conditional use permit. CITIZEN COMMENTS t of f surveyed the 12 property owners within 350 + eet of this s to f or their comments concerning this project. 0+ the two ,replies, one had no comment and one was in f avor ,. In Favor Comment I am in f av or o+ develop mere t n this area. I have sup p ort ed, a l l .progress in this commun i ty s There+ ore , I expect approval when and i+ I choose to rezone or develop my 1.8 acres also. 3 REFERENCE Site Descr^ i tion #.. Site size: 3.2 acre «Existing land use: The site is comprised of +our^ individual lots, two of which have single dwellings . urr,oundin Land Uses Northerly: 1--694 Southerly: County Road D Easterly: A single dwelling on a lot zoned R--31 multiple dwelling residential. Westerly: Maple Ridge Apartments Past Actions 12--13-38 : The Community Design Review Board conditionally approved plans for this development« Pl nSL 1. Land use plan designation: RH, high density residential. This land use category allows up to 34 persons per net acre. 20 Proposed density: 128 persons s Permitted density: 129 persons Zoning: R-3 and BC 4, Section 36--153 ( 2. a .) lists R--3 uses in a BC zone as a "conditional use" to be approved by the City Council « kdlgoi ns .mem Attachment is Land Use Plan leap 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan Reduction 4.. Appl i cant' s Letter dated August 1 , 1.983 56 Resolution 4 Interchange ma )or Mann tit n m w a oollootor f y p w.. r � n .i. 1 • mill 0r`- ©rias ;j 3C� U M _ •�C J rte. � r ONS I ONO C ► 1 CUT � i OS •� • nH LSCI JKJR I RL c LSC. r ha go ^� � • .. O HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN 'S Attachment 1 a`o t C W m .., C O HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN 'S Attachment 1 • oA c c �►:v t+ o kee. db" 3 • o w Aae e w • 1 No cc e y 0 o 3 —•------ --- D e' s • 5 G a. •cs Ir 3G . - Pg icy •44 in , : °� co • k. oc t 77 _S7 L 9 (v7- Nowma • $•�•c7� C ; 0 W9 W 0A .080 J C .� O 4d 1 p xtp 7i� t r� �4 �- j Maple Ridge part en►ts. a • �. • a.� �; *,o _..... q ,�, . til/ L s • \.. AKNEICD ... `�?9J _ ,, ,,,:i L :1� D •�• 1741 ItfYP n _ 4A.1 • • •` f 1 4-18-74-. ' •;; ME.KE D r� '.' tt y• ? -' Bi 172 R ao AJ 7 t X ' * : �- l .e , : : j +., 1 •t,�'� ? ' t• . }JL f • f • • �'r• T .�• • Z ji r ' [ • J • (1 r • • ,�. ' S. V • ' s • .• , . T � �! { 1� � G G'. •• I • � �,. 7 � • �. '1 Sir �- � EMS 11..� . y County Road D PROPERTY TINE /ZONING MAP _ 6 Attachment 2 L6 4 Cob , �L A JQN P -r" P -C r- trLN/E-A- _ ls2 Lti..lrr tai=A�TM...•►riT wa►u� FtcX V^..C.. AJti.EA . LJC% 157- fit: "-T t OwJ t7., Pic- (-• -aT • C-o+�C.ttc..T C PARK v -n Ai.J fl Vv L r P s ,p j G016 , i Attachment 3 D 9 ,y C- Gcvca:zTG S 0 Q •� G b> 00011%G 1Jl,�I 8 a ws d 4AP ' - LICAKT PoX.� OtT,,>AtUC ^� 40 a PC.4 'p � • ? U -d *4"0 f' ja-gr - � 4 Id PC "''13'T.3 •WMM d �� .._.... - - ---Z49.1a S 89' S1' 24� W � cw __ -----9b.CIS�. - 1 aIL s ' •� .ii�.�, ;',�L.���.•�� • rf iI �.401!•� • • w 0.y _slcw.w;-...,. s� ` �. `I . Z. t• t �. - . 7 J{•N . . . r 04, Attachment 3 PODAWILTZ1.� DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 101 SOUTH 7TH AVENUE. SUITE 203. P.O. BOX 1361 ST. CLOUD, MN 56302 (612) 255.1719 5 1, 1988 RE: JEAN TURNER GOINS. N. WALTER COINS MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA To Whom It May Concern: P1ea.se consider this the request of the undersigned for a o al Use Permit to allow multi-fami1y housing in a Conditin commercial zone** The intended use - 66 units of multi -family rental housing - is in c.onformance with all relevant City plans, co, des and guidelines with the sole exception of a portion of the site is currently zoned commercial. .Furthermore: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter 2. The establishment or maintenance of. the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety o r general welfare. 3 The use shall be located, designed , maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning di strict . 4. The use shall not depreciate property values . 5. The use shall note be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential, surrounding land uses, due to noises,- glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water - po ll ut 'ion, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. • The use shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic 6. T 9 y on local streets and shall not create traff is congestion, ion unsafe access or parking needs that will g � cause undue burden to the area properties* 8 Attachment 4 AUG 0 1 10 i 7. The use shall be served by essential public serves, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilitles, schools, and parks. 8. The use shall not create excessive additional" requirements at public cost for public facilities and services* and shall not be detrimental t,o the welfare of the City. 9. The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use shall cause minimal adverse environmental effects-. Sincerely, PODAWILTZ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (As Representative for Jean Turner Goins & N. Walter Goins) �f !l J. Mi cha 1 oda ' -1"tz i JMP:sms co Jean Turner Goins N, Walter Goins 9 Pursuant to due cal 1 and notice thereof a regal ar meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly cal I ed and hel d in the council chambers in said city on'the day of 1989 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The fol I owing members were absent: WHEREAS9 N. Walter Gons initiated a rezoning from BC9 business commercial to R-3, multiple dwelling residential for the following - described property: EX E 231 FTs PART, LYING S OF HWY 694, OF E 1/8 OF SE 1/4 ( SUB J TO RD) IN SEC 34 TN 30 RN 22 WHEKL'i�`� the procedU%ral history of this rezoning is as follows: F in This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on 196 The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be 0 209 "'The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing- on 1989 to consider this reztan ingn Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to laws All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also cons a. dered reportsmo ,and recomendatins of the City staff and Planning Commissionle - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following +i.ndings of +act,., 1a 20 The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan a The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area incl uded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded The proposed change wil 1 serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public wel+are s 4w The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical e++ icient and economical extension of publ is ,services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schoolsof 10 ATTACHMENT 5 Adopted this day of , 198 Seconded by Ayes-_ STATE off' MINNESOTA } :COUNTY of RAMSE Y SSIS C z T Y aF MAPLEWOOD � I, the undersigned , being the dul y qual i f i ed and appointed clerk of the City cif Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have c ref ul 1 y compared the attached and f orego i ng extract ref minute of a regul.ar meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of 198 with the original on f i l e in my o++ ice , and the same is a f ul 1 , true and complete transcript therefrom insofar~ as the same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 198 e City C1erk City of Maplewood 11 February 22, 1989 MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Michael McGuire �... From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins. Subject: Accident Information For County Road D And White Bear Avenue And For County Road D From Hazelwood To White Bear Avenue At the February 13, 1989, City Council meeting,'the Council members requested i nformati on ' on accidents at the above -listed areas. The following number of accidents were recorded over the following years. They are broken down between property damage and personal injury accidents. COUNTY ROAD D &WHITE BEAR AVENUE Property Damage Personal Injury 1985 22 3 1986 22 3 1987 48 6 1988 38 6 1989 7 2 (1989 is through February 14 only) COUNTY ROAD D FROM HAZELWOOD AVENUE TO WHITE BEAR AVENUE 1985 0 1986 0 1987 18 1988 22 1989 2 (1989 is through February 14 only KVC: j s Total 25 25 54 44 9 0 0 0 0 1 19 4 26 0 2 Commission -4- Planning - Minutes 1-12--89 f these ut 1 i t i as been Instal 1 at ion o Cit Engineer P . " com l eted , as determined he Y • a ten--foot-wide :til i i i ty b . he applicant de ng en f eet of ea meat to City over the east t n i cion=: Seven and Lots Lot i One and T h in y lock, Ten, Dearborn Pari:: be retained over the west 2s A ut i y easeme shat i 33 eet of the r i gh -of -way to be vacated . - - Aye sAx d ah 1 Bav%ret t , C missioner Sl eaten seconde Cardinal , Dempsey, ischer, Larson, Si _und ik: , S1 etten D, Conditional Use Permit t or Rezoning: Coo Rd* Do (Maple Knol 1 Apartments) rt presented. Norman Cole, The staff repo was P representing the architect and applicant, was present at the meetings from the ub l i c on this proposal . There were no comments p Commissioner Larson moved the Planning Commission recommend 01 ution rem on i n g the ESC zone to Approval of the re_X R-3. ,on the conditional use permits Take no action A es--Axdah1 , Barrett , Commissioner Fischer seconded Y Dempsey., Cardinal 9 Fischer, Larsonj S i gmund ik , Sl etten • nal Use Permit Revision - Menar E cnd.�t�ta � Secrety Olson presented the staff re rt. �- � Mary P'rocha ti of Menards was p r nt at the meeting and answered uest i s of comm i ss • ers . answ q v the P l ann ing Comm i scion Commissioner Fischer recommend: the res tion revising s i ng the As Adopt i o of 1 ewood condi ' on a l use permit r Z28� Map r i , based on the f i nd i n required by Co C H G- g Action by Council: MEMORANDUM Endorsed, m6dified., TO: City _Manager FROM I : Director of Community Develoopment ReJ ected,,--- e.. SUBJECT: Planning Comm issin Survey Dat DATE:. July 39 1989 INTRODUCTION The City Council should decide whether they want to take any action on the Planning Commission Survey discussed at several previous meetingso The last time it was discussed, Council tabled it until after last Thursday's joint meeting* BACKGROUND The City Council previously declared Al Goin's position on the Planning Commission to be vacant, but did not authorize st.a++ to +301 the vacancy. Council -requested a survey of other planning commissions, which was reviewed at the April 6th meeting. (See attached survey.) The survey showed that planning commissions varied in size from five to ton members. The majorityg 17 of 26 cities, have seven member commissionse Since the Council last reviewed this survey, Commissioner Dempsey has resigned to take a job in Northfield. This leaves two vacancies on the Commissions RECOMMENDATION If the Council is considering a reduction in the size of the Commission, they should initiate a code amendment to do so and refer it to the Planning Commissions Otherwise, Council should authorize staff to advertise to fill the two vacancies* GOPLANCOMM Attachment: Survey 1MEHDRANDtJM TO w City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Planning Intern SUBJECT: Survey of Planning Commissions DATE: March 22, 1989 INTRODUCTION The City Council requested a survey of the size and duties of other Planning Commissions. This survey included 26 cities in the metropolitan area closest in size to Maplewood (based on the 1980 census.) or adjacent to the City. MEMBERSHIP The composition of Planning Commissions varies. from five to ten members. The majority, 17 of 26 cities, have seven member Planning Commissions. Three of the cities use alternates. DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES The general duties of the Planning Commission are to act as an advisory committee to the City Council to review applications and make recommendations on these applications and to study planning issues. Other responsibilities are as follows: reviewing all plans, policies and programs for development in order to promote orderly development. tow preparing and recommending a Comprehensive Plan as well as reviewing all Plan amendments. assisting in zoning administration and reviewing al I zoning regulation amendments. The following are special tasks not done by all the Planning Commissions: conducting long-range planning. undertaking special studies for the City Council. sitting as Boards of Review or Appeal Ism reviewing all City construction proposals over $10,000. APPL I CAT I DNS REVIEWED 1. Variances: 19 of 26 cities. 2. CUP's or SUP 'S: 26 of 26. 3. Rezoning: 26 of 26. 4- 'Code Amendments: 23 of 26. 6 of these relate only to zoning issueso 5a Platting: 26 of 26. 68 Minor subdivisions: 20 of 26 70 PUD's: 25 of 25s 8. Pub ic vacations: 9 of 26. 9. Home occupations: 12 of 25. 10. Sign permits: 6 of 260 11. Site plares ts, 20-o+ 260 128 Building perma".tst: 2 of 26. 13. Capital Improvement Programs: 10 of 26. PUBLIC HEARINGS 23 of the 26 Planning Commissions hold public hearings. In most of these cities, the City Council also held a hearingg resulting in two hearings on each cases MEETINGS Planning Commissions meet from as few as three times a year to twice a month" FINAL AUTHORITY NM In four cities, the Planning Commission had final approval authority, subject to appeal to the City Council. This authority was in regard to 1) site plan approval requiring no variances, 2) site plan approval and special use permits and 3) two cases relating to variances* PAYMENT Six cities paid their Planning Commission memberse One paid per month ($70 for members and $85 for the chairman). The other five Paid per meet ing.l.from $8 per meeting to $25 per meetings One city will begin paying their commissioners in the near future" BGPCOMM I Ilk r . .�'�f . !i ■II SII I I i i � � i � � � . II �� 1 ��I ill�l� 11 I II �j JYI iJl111illL31111111 Ell11 Moll �'.IIBIfl�I1111111�I1�lO�lllsi II I I I I I I ` I � �� 11 ISO Nil IN Or Imo.. ' � � � . I I I I � L �'; '1 ► ; :. .� II t �I i I i I 1 t.l •1 Ilion! NJ III oil I 1 11 Ell 1111 mill Nil 91 oiln. ■��c;�e���g������ ��� oil Ell 1111 oil INii o�ii I�i�� ����■���n� �■ ■ IIfl18� 1111111■� l 1�E11 X1111 I II .l ���F oil mill Ell Eli] ��II �IIIN 'nil 0 Ell nil Nil0 ■,��nm■�u1111111111 11111111111 Allis milli KIM u��.��u��i� . ��i��um■i�i� ����%��i�i�iw1111111111111iff w�:1;� �u�;�wui■ _ ��u�11 Ell �Mill ��;� �0�J. ���eni�iiiiiii ■����►�■ ■�e����■i� nil ��milli ■iii�p■ � ,IIIIIUm;IIIIu1m!l118111mI1NI1oil IIIJII1111111 ClDiilil�i0il�t3�!ItNifil�'.i�f•71�';1111111��1 i['��'='?�.����I�!!�71�;IIIM11�11�'111�11�Il11111@�u1�1111L��A1�1111�!l11Nil 111, �Il���lllil►ID .��i1�A11W�11f1A11�1W.W�,1111111lt-� �e�n i�m1�i1i�n a�oi�mmoil WIN ����cn�i�� �i111uCM11 oil N,n1111111loll w milli llimillill 11mil Imns nu�n���m����� Milli 01117 HIM 11111 "Ellin u loll Ellin nil I I ol 111 imil 111di Will I '���IINII� M! i 1�11�01 IIEII i1��r1111dW��11Ilr11�J111111�� ��IIt1111��111�v1�I1�U1�I11��I11�W��111WW�lllll�.l'��.Ii�h//i'�1�11�✓�il�llw��1111���'IG(lW�'11�W�:1 AGENDA ITEM Aotion by Co tail: MEMORANDUM Endorsed..... Modified TO: City Manager Rejected Date FROM: Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Bituminous Overlay Project --Maplewood Project 89-14 DATE: June 30, 1989 The fol lowing is a list of the recommended streets to be overlayed in 1989. Many of the streets (as in the City Heights area) are well worth saving and the overt ay is proposed for the purpose. of preventing further deter i orat ion , thus great I y extend i ng the it 1 i + e . Other streets (DeSoto, for example) are in very poor condition, and maintenance costs are very high --hence their presence on the proposed list. Street From .City Heights Jackson Kingston City Heights Agate Larpenteur 'Onacrest Summer Onacrest Agate Bellwood Jackson Summer Jackson Adolphus Rosel awn Fenton Beaumont Beaumont Fenton DeSoto Larpenteur Edgemont Larpenteur Kingston Edgemont Ari; wriglut Larpenteur Sloan Bellwood Bellwood Sloan To, cost. Summer $12,512 Agate 29260 City Heights 13,109 South 49454 Agate 69810 Adolphus 9,326 East 815304 South 39074 Jackson 39(.)72 Rosel awn 6,33. Rose lawn 20,048 Kingston 31438 Ark wright 964 Kingston 31444 Rosel awn 39205 McMenemy 24962 TOTAL COST $103,324 $120 000 was budgeted for this work. The remaining $17,000 wil I be used for crack -seal ing of Wood ynn Avenue between White Bear Avenue and McKnight Road, WCC jw T29N,R22W 7,8 91 le i/ N • 205 80 N. 4j Q16> v W O QZ 37� W cr BEL ST . DELE ST. :DOLPHUS ST. GATE ST,* .LLEN PL . RCADE ST. RIEL ST. RKWRIGHT ST. TLANTIC ST. COUNTY RD . ARCLAY ST . 35 10 [36] L / T TL E CANADA � f CONNO; CT �- ,22 X60; 2400 No i p0. 58 l '. it oa 17>1 V17NG a or N sa iN r w o w 0 K-1 0 w N to B- 5 . CO A-6 GALL AVE. K-1 F-6 GEM ST. H-2 B- 5 . 6 GERANIUM AVE . L-9 B-6 GERMAIN ST. H-3, 4 D-6 GERMAN ST. I-4 E-2, 3, '4, 5, 6 GERVAIS AVE. E, F, G, J-1, 3 GERVAIS CT. I-3 C-4, 5r 6 GLENDON ST'. L-91 10 F-4, .51 6 GORDON ST . F-6 GRANDVIEW AVE. G, H-4 A to J-4 • GREENBRI ER ST. D-5 G -3-r 4 , *5, 6 GULDEN PL . G-6 AGENDA ITEM h' AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer Modif i ReJaote SUBJECT: Beam Avenue Signals, Project 89-15 Dat DATE: June 30, 1989 Attached are three agreements with Ramsey County for traffic control signals along Beam Avenue. The three locations are Hazelwood Street, Southlawn Drive, and the south mall driveway west of White Bear Avenue. The agreements are the same as other agreements with Ramsey Count}/ in that they Would own and operate the signals after completion. ,The agreements stipulate that Maplewood would pay the cost associated with the Hazelwood and Southlawn installations. With the emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) systems this amounts to .$196,000. The Southlawn system, however, is to be paid for by the developers of Birch Run Plaza. The south mall driveway wsystem cost would be split with the county. In addition, the city would pay for most of the coordination equipment to 'interconnect the signal systems~ Mapl_-ewood Cost Summary -- Hazelwood .. $ 981000 Southlawn 8,000 South Mall Driveway 53,000 Interconnect: 331700 Total uV185,700 Tax -increment funds in the amount of $200,000 are available to fund this project. Authorization to execute the attached agreements and establishing a budget of $200,000 is recommended. KGH jc Attachment AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS AND EVP SYSTEM AGREEMENT NO. 89022 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Ramsey, Department of Public Works hereinafter ref y � erred to as the "County", and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as the "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is considered mutually desirable to install traffic control signals with street lights and install emergency vehicle pre-emption on Beam Avenue (County State Aid Highway No. 19) at Hazelwood Street, (Municipal State Aid Highway No. 112); and g y WHEREAS, the City agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System, hereinaf ter ref erred to as the "EVP System", y ' • as a part of said traffic control signals with street lights in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the County and the City will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of said traffic control signals with street lihts and EVP System as hereinafter set forth; and g y NOW, THEREFORE, U IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications andPo ro sals P and shall perform the contract administration required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute "Engineering" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The County shall perform the inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work described immediately above shall constitute "Inspection" and shall be so referred -to hereinafter, 3. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service equipment or pad shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter, 4. The City shall install or cause the installation of traffic control signals with street lights on Beam Avenue at Hazelwood Street at its own expense. Estimated construction cost is $90,000.00. 5. The City shall install or cause the installation of an EVP System on Beam Avenue at Hazelwood Street at its own expense. Estimated construction cost is $8,000.00. 6. Upon completion of the traffic control signals with street lights and EVP Systems, and a request in writing by the County, the City shall pay the County an amount equal to 3 percent of the. final construction cost for inspection. 89022 .Page 1 of 4 7. The City shall intall pr cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service equipment including any necessary extensions of power lines. Upon completion of the traffic control signal and EVP System installation, necessary electrical power for their operation shall be at the sole expense of the City. In accordance with the Policy for Lighting County Roadways, County Board Resolution 78-1394, the City shall maintain and pay energy costs of the integral street lighting. 8. Upon completion of the project, the County shall maintain and keep in repair the traffic control signal, including relamping, cleaning and painting at its expense. 9. The EVP System provided for in pargraph 5 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, revised or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: A. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of the EVP System considered necessary or desirable, ' f or any reason, shall be done by County forces, or, upon concurrence in writing by the County's Traffic Engineer, may be done by others all at the cost and expense of the City. Be Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. C. The City shall maintain and require others using the EVP System to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time the traffic signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System. Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the County immediately. D. All maintenance of Ahe EVP System shall be performed by the County and the City shall reimburse the County for actual cost thereof. The County shall submit an invoice to the City annually, listing all labor, equipment, materials and overhead used to maintain the EVP System. Labor costs, overhead and equipment costs will be at the established rates paid by the County at the time the work is performed, and material costs will be invoiced at the actual cost thereof to the County. Twenty-five per cent (256) of these costs will be added to the invoice, to cover the County's cost for supervision and administration, in accordance with the policy for Traffic Control Signal Systems, County Board Resolution 81-1001. The City shall promptly pay the County the full amount due. E. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misued or the conditions set forth in the Paragraph B above are violated, and such issue or violation continues after receipt by said party of written notice thereof from the County, the County shau remove the EVP System. - Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this paragraph, the field. wiring, cabinet wiring and other components shall become the property of the County. All infrared detector heads and indicator lamps mounted external to the traffic signal cabinet will be returned to the City. The detector receiver and any other assembly located in the traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed will not affect the traffic control signal operation, will be returned to the City. 89022 Page 2 of 4 F. All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the County, through its Traffic Engineer. G. Except for the negligent acts of the County, its agents and employees engaged in the maintenance work, the City shall assume all liability for, and save the County, its agents and employees, harmless from any and all claims for damages, actions or causes of action. arising out of the continuing uses by the City including but not limited to the operation, use and existence of the equipment for the EVP System. 10. In the event that the traffic control signal is removed for any reason from the aforementioned intersection, the physical equipment shall become the property of the County, subject to a prorata credit to the City based on a ten (10) year life expectancy. Such credit to be made on the basis of the County's entering legs of the intersection which represents 1/2 (5096) of the total cost to construct the traffic signal. In the event that the County elects to return such equipment to the City within said. ten (10) year period, the equipment shall become the property of the City and no credit to be made to either party. s 11. Participation of the parties hereto shall not be considered as fulfilling any requirem ents in future construction, upgrading and revisions of any type to the traf f is signal at this location. Future work will be in accordance with the policy for Traf f is Control Signal Systems or subsequent revisions thereto, County Board Resolution 81--1001. 12. All timing and related adjustments of the traffic control signal and interconnect shall be determined by the County through its Traffic Engineer, and no changes shall be made to these adjustments without the approval of the County. 13. Any and all persons engaged in the maintenance work to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf' of those employees so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of those employees so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. 89022 Page 3 of 4 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their signatures. In presence of: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA By Its By �. Its Date COUNTY OF RAMSEY Recommended for approval: Kenneth E. W eltzin, P.E. Director Ramsey County Public Works Department By Chairperson Board of County Commissioners Attest: _ Approved as to Form: Chief Clerk -County .~Board Date 89022 Page 4 of 4 AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS AND EVP SYSTEM AGREEMENT NO. 89023 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Ramsey, Department of Public Works, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as the "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is considered mutually desirable to install traffic control signals with street lights and install emergency vehicle pre-emption on Beam Avenue (County State Aid Highway No. 19) at Southlawn Drive, (Municipal State Aid Highway No. 117); and WHEREAS, the City agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System", as a part of said traffic control signals with street lights in accordance with the terms and conditions herleinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the County and the City will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of said traffic control signals with street Y lights and EVP System as g hereinafter set forth; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications and proposals and shall perforin the contract administration required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute "Engineering" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The County- shall perform the inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work described immediately above shall constitute "Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter, 3. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service equipment or pad shall constitute the actual -"Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 4. The City shall install or cause the installation of traffic control signals with street lights on Beam Avenue at Southlawn Drive at its own expense. Estimated construction cost is $90,000.00. 5. The City shall install or cause the installation of an EVP System on Beam Avenue at Southlawn Drive at its own expense. Estimated construction cost is $8,000.00. 6. Upon completion of the traffic control signals with street lights and EVP Systems, and a request in writing by the County, the City shall pay the County an amount equal to 3 percent of the final construction cost for inspection. 89023 Page 1 of 4 ?. The City shall intall or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service equipment 'including any necessary extensions of power lines. Upon completion of the traffic control signal and EVP System installation necessary electrical power for their operation shall be at the sole expense of the City. In accordance with the Policy for Lighting County Roadways, Count Board Resolution 78-1394, the y y City shall maintain and pay energy costs of the integral street lighting. 8. Upon completion of the project, the County shall maintain and keep in repair the traffic control signal, including relamping, cleaning and painting at its expense. 9. TheEVP System provided for in pargraph 5 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, revised or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: A. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of the EVP System considered Necessary or desirable, for any reason, shall be done by County forces, or, upon concurrence in writing by the County's Traffic Engineer, may be done by others all at the cost and expense of the City. s B. Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01., Subdivision 5 and 169.03, Co The City shall maintain and require others using the EVP System to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time the traffic signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System. Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the County im mediately. D. All maintenance of the EVP System shall be performed by the County and the City shall reimburse the County for actual cost thereof. The County shall submit an invoice to the City annually, listing all labor, equipment, materials and overhead used to maintain the EVP System. Labor costs, overhead and equipment costs will be at the established rates paid by the County at the time the work is performed, and material costs will be invoiced at the actual cost thereof to the County. Twenty-five per cent (256) of these costs will be added to the invoice, to cover the County's cost for supervision and administration, in accordance with the policy for Traffic Control Signal Systems, County Board Resolution 81-1001. The City shall promptly pay the County the full amount due. E. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misued or the conditions set forth in the Paragraph B above are violated, and such issue or violation continues after receipt by said party of written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring and other components shall become the property of the County. All infrared detector heads and indicator lamps mounted external to the traffic signal cabinet will be returned to the City. The detector receiver and any other assembly located in the traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed will not affect the traffic control signal operation, will be returned to the City. 89023 Page 2 of 4 F. All timing of said EVP Systemshall be determined by the County, through its Traffic Engineer. G. Except for the negligent acts of the County, its agents and employees engaged ed in the maintenance work, the City shall assume all liability for, g and save the County, its agents and employees, harmless from any and all claims for damages, actions or, causes of action arising out of the continuinguses by the City including but not limited to the operation, use and existence of the equipment for the EVP Systern. 10. In the event that the traffic control signal is removed for any reason from the aforementioned intersection, the physical equipment shall become the property of. the � the Count subject to a prorata credit to the City based on a ten (10) year li f e expectancy* Such credit to be made on the basis of the County's entering legs of the intersection which represents 1/2 (50%) of the e total cost to construct the traffic signal. � In the event that the County elects to return such equipment to the City within said (10)year tenperiod, the equipment shall become the property of the City and no credit to be made to either party. 11. Participation of the parties hereto shall not be considered as fulfilling any requirements in future construction, upgrading and revisions of any type to the traffic signal at this location. Future work will be in accordance with the policy for Traffic Control Signal Systems or subsequent revisions thereto, County Board Resolution 81-10010 n g Y 12. All timingand related adjustments of the traffic control signal and . o► Engineer, and no interconnect shall be determined by the County throu�,h its Traffic g , changes es shall be made to these adjustments without the approval of the County. 13. Any and all persons engaged in the maintenance work to be performed by County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that the C y h may arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of those y employees so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part � of those employees so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. 89023 Page 3 of 4 a IN WITNESS W HEREOF, the -parties have hereunto affixed their signatures. In presence of: Approved as to Form: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA By Its By Its Date COUNTY OF RAMSEY Recommended for approval: Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director Ramsey County Public Works Department By Chairperson Board of County Commissioners Attest: Chief Clerk -County Board Date 89023 Page 4 of 4 AGREEMENT FOR 'INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS, EVY SYSTEM, INTERCONNECT AND GEOMETRICS AGREEMENT NO. 89024 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Ramsey, Department of Public Works, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as the "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to install traffic control signals with street lights and install emergency vehicle pre-emption on Beam Avenue (County State Aid Highway No. 19) at Maplewood Mall South Entrance; and WHEREAS, the City agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System", as a part of said traffic control signals with street lights in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and s WHEREAS, it is mutually desirable to install interconnect along Beam Avenue (County State Aid Highway No. 19) from Hazelwood Street (Municipal State Aid Highway No. 112) to Maplewood Mall South Entrance; and WHEREAS, the County requested and the City agrees to provide a westbound left turn lane and right turn island on Beam Avenue at Maplewood Niall South Entrance, hereinafter referred to as "Geometries" as a part of said traffic control signals in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the County and the City will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of said traffic control signals with street lights, EVP Systems, interconnect and geometries as hereinafter set- forth; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications and proposals and shall perform the contract administration required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute "Engineering" and shall be so referred to hereinafter, 2. The County shall perform the inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth. Such work described immediately above shall constitute "Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3e The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service equipment or pad shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 4e The City shall install or cause the installation of traffic control signals with street lights on Beam Avenue at Maplewood Mall South Entrance. Estimated construction cost is $90,000.00. County's share is 50.00 percent. The. City's share is 50.00 percent. 89024 Page 1 of 4 5. The City shall install or cause Avenue at Maplewood Mall South Entrance cost is $8,000.00, the installation of an EYP System on Beam at its own expense. Estimated construction 6. The City shall install or cause the installation of an interconnect along Beam Avenue from Hazelwood Street to Maplewood Mall South Entrance. Estimated construction cost is $40,509.00. County's share is 16.67 percent. The City's share is 83.33 percent. 7. The City shall install or cause the installation of Geometries required for westbound right and left turns on Beam Avenue at Maplewood Mall South Entrance at the County's own expense. Estimated construction cost is $23,700.00 8. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the City, the Count shall advance to the Ci y Y City an amount equal to their portion of the project costs based on the actual bid price plus three percent (3%) of such amount for the County's share for the Cost of engineering. Such amount shall include a deduct in the amount equal to 3 percent of the City share on the actual bid price for the City share for the cost of inspection. 9. Upon final payment to the contractor and computation of the County's final p y anal share for the work provided for herein, that amount of the funds advanced by the County in excess of the County final share will be returned to the County without interest and the County agrees to pay to the City that amount of its final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the County. 10. The City shall intall or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power supply to the service equipment including any necessary extensions of power lines. Upon completion of the traffic control signal, EVP System and interconnect installation, necessary electrical power for their operation shall be at the sole expense of the City. In accordance with the Policy for Lighting County Roadways, County Board Resolution 78-1394, the City shall maintain and pay energy costs of the integral street lighting. 11. Upon completion of the project, the County shall maintain and keep in repair the geoinetrics on Beam Avenue at its own expense. 12. Upon completion of -the project, the County shall maintain and keep in repair the traffic control signal and interconnect, including relamping, cleaning and painting at its expense. 13. The EVP System provided for in pargraph 5 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, revised or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: A. All modifications, revisions and maintenance of the EVP System considered necessary or desirable, for any reason, shall be done by County forces, or, upon concurrence in writing by the County's Traffic Engineer, may be done by others all at the cost and expense of the City. Be Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. 89024 Page 2 of 4 Co The City shall maintain and require others using the EVP System to maintain a log showing the date, time and type of emergency for each time the traffic signal covered hereby is actuated and controlled by the EVP System.. Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the County immediately. D. All maintenance of the EVP System shall be performed by the County and the City shall reimburse the County for actual cost thereof. The County shall submit an invoice to the City annually, listing all labor, equipment, materials and overhead used to maintain the EVP System. Labor costs, overhead and equipment costs will be at the established rates paid by the County at the time the work is performed, and material costs will be invoiced at the actual cost thereof to the County. Twenty-five per cent (256) of these costs will be added to the invoice, to cover the County's cost for supervision and administration, in accordance with the policy for Traffic Control Signal Systems, County Board Resolution 81-1001. The City. shall promptly pay the County the full amount due. 1 E. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misued or the conditions set forth in the Paragraph B above are violated, and such issue or violation continues after receipt by said party of written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring and other components shall become the property of the County. All infrared detector heads and indicator lamps mounted external to the traffic signal cabinet will be returned to the City. The detector receiver and any other assembly located in the traffic control signal cabinet, which if removed will not affect the traffic control signal operation, will be returned to the City. F. All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the County, through its Traffic Engineer, G. Except for the negligent acts of the County, its agents and employees engaged in the maintenance work, the City shall assume all liability for, and save the County, its agents and employees, harmless from any and all claims for damages, actions or causes of action arising out of the - continuing uses by the City including but not limited to the operation, use and existence of the equipment for the EVP System, 14. All timing andrelated adjustments of the traffic control signal and interconnect shall be determined by the County through its Traffic Engineer, and no changes shall be made to these adjustments without the approval of the County. 15. Any and all persons engaged in the maintenance work to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of those employees so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of those employees so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. 89024 Page 3 of 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their signatures. In presence of: Approved as to Form: CITY OF. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA By. . Its By �. Its Date COUNTY OF RAMSEY Recommended for approval: Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director Ramsey County Public Works Department By Chairperson Board of County Commissioners Attest: Chief Clerk -County Board Date 89024 Page 4 of 4 To: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor and City Council City Manager tet'• MANAGER SALARY ADJUSTMENT July 4, 1989 Agenda Number M�� ,fiction by Counoil v Endorsed Modif �. ed...�., ... Rejected Date At the July 3, 1989 Council/Manager meeting, the City Council developed a salary and benefit package for the City Manager and directed that it be placed on a regular meeting agenda for approval. The proposal includes the following changes to the current plan, and would be effective May 1, 1989: 9 5% salary adjustment ($64,896/year to $68,140/year) • $50.00/month increase in deferred compensation ($300/month to $350/month) MAM:kaz BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING STH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI June 14, 1989 Mr. Michael McGuire City Manager 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: City Council -Request Norm Anderson Ordinance Dear Mr. McGuire: D W Fm JU11 1 9 1989 ii /-/ .W-� 1 41 Action by Council: Endorsed _._..__.... Modified Rejected Date - Please be advised that at the last council meeting, Councilperson Anderson requested a draft of a plastic packaging ordinance. Please find herein the proposed draft. The draft is based on St. Paul's Plastic Packaging Ordinance. In addition, St. Paul apparently has an advisory committee focusing on the Plastic Package Ordinance. I suggest that the staff be directed to research the present status of the advisory committee on environmentally acceptable packaging. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, & KELLY, P.A. Patrick J. e y PJK: cd ORDINANCE m ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION: PLASTIC PACKAGING Section 1. Legislative Purpose. The Council finds that discarded packaging from foods and beverages constitutes a significant and growing portion of the waste in the City of Maplewood's waste stream. Regulation of food and beverage packaging, therefore, is a necessary part of any effort to encourage or recyclable and compostable waste stream, thereby reducing the disposal of solid waste and the economic and environmental costs of waste management for the citizens of Maplewood and others working or doing business in the City of Maplewood. The Council fianber finds that plastic packaging is rapidly replacing other packaging material, and that most plastic packaging is for foods and beverages is nondegradable, nonreturnable and nonrecyclable. The Council also finds that the two main processes used to dispose of discarded nondegradable, nonreturnable and nonrecyclable plastic foods and beverage packaging, are land filling and incineration, both of which should be minimized for environmental reasons. Chemicals .hazardous to human health and to the safety of the environment are present in the composition of plastic packaging and have been found to escape into the air when this packaging is burned in incinerators, and contribute to the environmental problems associated with ash residue resulting from the incineration process. The Council therefore finds that the minimization of nondegradable, nonreturnable and nonrecyclable food and beverage packaging originating at retail food establishments within the City of Maplewood is necessary and desirable in orderto reduce the City's waste stream, so as to reduce the volume of landfilled waste, to minimized toxic by-products, of incineration, to make the waste stream less damaging to the environment, and to make our City and neighboring communities more environmentally sound places to live. The Councils find that the plastic packaging used for foods and beverages contributes significantly to litter and the disposal of litter, is more difficult to collet, and lasts indefinitel Y until picked up or cleaned up. Section 2. Definitions. As used in this Chapter, the following terms and phrases shall have the meanings as defined in this Section: (a) "Packaging" shall mean and include all food related wrappings, adhesives, cords, bindings, strings, tapes, ribbons, bags, boxes, coverings and containers; and shall further include cups, glasses and similar containers for drinking out of or for holding liquids, and plates and serving trays but shall specifically exclude plastic knives, forks and spoons sold for intended for use as utensils. 1 (b) "Environmentally acceptable packaging" shall mean and include. (1) DEGRADABLE PACKAGING: Paper or other cellulose-basedpackaging capableof being decomposed by natural biological ' or biochemical processes; (2) RETURNABLE PACKAGING: Food or beverage containers or packages, such as but not limited to, soft drink bottles and milk containers, that are capable of being returned to the distributor, such as but not limited to, dairies and soft drink bottlers, for reuse as the same food or beverage container used at least once; (3) RECYCLABLE PACKAGING: Packaging made of materials that are separable tom solid waste, by the generator or dcollection, for which there is an existing city -approved curbside recycling program operating in and making curbside pickups in the City of Maplewood. Packaging made of either polyethylene terepthalate (P.E.T.) or high density polyethylene (H.D.P.E.) shall be considered recyclable if and when it is collected for recycling in the same manner- as there stated (c) "Retail food establishments" as used in this chapter means a "food establishment as defined in the City of Maplewood Code. References made to retail food establishments in this Section are specifically defined herein to include, for the purposes of prohibitions, penalties and adverse actions against licenses, the owner of such establishment and all persons, firms or corporations operating and/or managing such establishment. Section 3. Prohibitions. No person, firm or corporation owning, operating or managing a retail food establishment located within the City of Maplewood shall do or allow to be done any of the following: (a) Within the City of Maplewood, sell or convey at retail, or possess with the intent to sell or convey at retail, any food or beverage which is placed, wrapped or packaged at any time at or before the time or point of sale in or on packaging which is not environmentally acceptable packaging; nor (b) Within the City of Maplewood, provide to retail customers, or possess with the intent to provide to retail customers, packaging which is not enviroentally acceptable packaging. (c) The presence on the premises of the retail food establishment of packaging which is not environmentally acceptable packaging shall constitute a rebuttable presumption of intent to sell or convey at retail, or to provide to retail customers packaging which is not environmentally acceptable packaging; provided, however, that this subparagraph shall not apply to manufacturers, brokers or warehouse operators, who conduct or transact no retail food or beverage business. 2 Section 4. Enforcement. The director of community planning shall have the duty and authority to enforce provisions of this chapter. Section S. Rules and Regulations. The director of community planning may upon notice and hearing promulgate such rules and regulations as he or she deems necessary to carry out the alms of this chapter and protect the health of the public, including the development of. exceptions hereafter sections for which there is no commercially available alternative and for flexible packaging, in harmony with the leg*slative purposes set forth in previous sections of this chapter. Section 6. Exemptions. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary,this chapter shall not apply to: (a) any flexible packaging of .0.25 mm (0.01 in.) or less in thickness approved by the director pursuant to rulespromulgated under previous sections; and (b) any packaging usedat hospitals or nursing homes; (c) any paper, cellophane or other cellulose -based packaging that is coated with plastic; (d) any packaging which is not environmentally acceptable for which there is no commercially available alternative as determined by the director by rule promulgated pursuant to previous sections. In determining whether there are commercially available alternatives the director shall consider (1) the availability of environmentally acceptable packaging for affected products; (2) the economic consequences to manufacturers, suppliers, retailers and other vendors of requiring environmentally acceptable packaging when available; and (3) the competitive effects on manufacturers, suppliers, retailers and other vendors involved in the sale of product brands or labels available only in packaging that is not environmentally acceptable packaging. Every rule creating an exemption under this paragraph shall be reviewed annually by thedirectorto determine whether current conditions continue to warrant the exemption. Section 7. Penalties. Each violation of any provision of this chapter or of lawful regulations promulgated under previous sections hereof shall be a et misdemeanor, for , petty which the mamum fine shall be Each day on which the violations occur constitutes a separate violation. Section 8. License Adverse Action. Each violation on any provision of this chapter or of lawful regulations promulgated under previous sections hereof shall be sufficient grounds for adverse action pursuant to Maplewood City Code against any and all licenses held by or at the retail food establishment, and by its operator. The presumptive penalty for the first appearance of such a license holder before the City Council shall be a two-day suspension of all licenses held at or by the said retail food establishment. Section 9. Smrability. If any part or provision of this chapter or the application therefore to any person, entity or circumstances shall be adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall be confined it its operation to the part, provision or application which is directly involved in the controversy in which such judgement shall have been rendered, and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this chapter or the application thereof to other persons, entities or circumstances. 4 0 Action by Council, MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modified---- ReJ ected TO: City Manager Dat FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: C. Little Addition DATE: July 31 1989 The developers of the C., Little Addition have requested to be on the City Council agenda to change the name of one of their streets, We have received no other information at this time. i I FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP (MON)07.03.1$9 10:19 NO.S PAGE 2 LAW OFFICES BIRIOGS . lqT'.) MOROAN pa*rX*5Z0XAL ABBOCIATXON *800 FIRST XATIONAL B"X bVILDINO SAX= P Aw'aL, NEnqNEsoTA amoi TELEPHON3 (012) 991-1215 TELECOPI3MR (4512) -4071 INCLUDYNO TW Z FOSME2 FYI QY+' LZVIT'T, FALMUR, DOWLrX.. RC)TMA_W & SHARE- July HARE July 3, 19$9 VIA TELECOPY Mr. Geoffrey Olson Planning Director 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Action lay Council..:' Endorsed Modif ie Rejected.. Date, Re : pity of Maplewood Mulitf amily Housing Revenue Bonds p Series 1989 (Cottages ges of Maplewood Project -- FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Tear Geoff.9 Enclosed is a resolution for consideration by the Maplewood City Council on July 10. The resolution amends the principal amount of the bonds, their final maturity date, the mandatory sinking fund schedule for the bonds, and the nominal mate of the documents. 1 will send you a final, completed copy of the resolution on or prior to Friday, -July 7. If you have any questions, please give ate a call. Very truly yours, w(� Mary M. yrset MMDg Enc co. Mary L. 1ppe l 9*?* kx womm TRADE CENTZIR SSOQ TZV.W NATIONAL A&TqK BUXIDIN4 0 1D$ O 8 15AMT PAUL, I[II'P TWDTA 5&01 SAINT 1pl&=ti, X SOYA 65101 MT�1'N A iLIB, NTKNISyOTA W404 330 - 08M FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP (MON)07003.'$9 10:20 NO.S PAGE 3 591A extract of.Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of -the . City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a. regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 10th day of July, 1989, at .� o' clock P.M. The following members were present i and the following were absents Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adaption: RESOLUTION AMENDING CERTAIN TERMS EBF THE muLTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 19$90 (COTTAGES OF 1 APLEWOOD PROJEC76*fte FHA .INS URE D MORTGAGE LOAN) AND CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly 99conded by member , and .upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adapted. FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP (MON)07.03.7$9 10:20 NO.5 PAGE 4 r RESOLUTION AMENDING CERTAIN TERMS OF THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE RE FUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1889 (COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT* - FHA INSURES MORTGAGE LOAN) AND URTAIH DOCUMENTS RBLATING THERETO RE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Maplewood, Xinnesota, as followsla 1. On May 18, 1989, this Council adapted a resolution approving the issuan.ae of $2,229,800 Multifamily Mousing Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (Cottages of Maplewood Protect - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) (the "Bonds"). 2. Juran & Moody a Inc* (the "Bond Purchaser") has Advised the City that the final commitment for mortgage insurance by the Federal Housing Administration for the Bond is in the pz iac 1pa l &u«u,,, L u i $2,FI84,100. Therefore, certain terns of the Bonds and the related documents must be amended* 3. The City hereby approves the following revisionsa (2'.) the principal amount of the Bonds shall be revised from $2,229,800 to 52,184,1Q0, (i#.) the maturity date of the Bonds shall be revised to July 1, 2021, (iii) the mandatory sinking fund schedule set forth in Section 3-1(2){A) of the Indenture of Trust between the City and American National. Bank of Saint Paul shall be revised as follows FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP (MON )07. 03. 1 89 10: 21 NO.5 PAGE 5 and (Lv) the nominal, date of , documeftts set forth in paragraph 7 { a ) through (f) of the City's resolution adopted on May 18, 1989, shall be revised to ,duly 1, 19899 4. Except as herein modif iedt all other terms and provisions of the Bonds and the related documents as previously approved shall remain in full force and effect Passed t July 10, 19894 Mayor Attest city Mayor FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP STATE of M1 NNESOTA COUNTY of RMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD (MON)07.03.1'89 10:21 NO.5 PAGE G 11 the undersigned, being the duly qualified and City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Kinnesotal Do HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached .and �3 fore oin extract of minutes with the original thereof on foregoing file in my ► off ice and that the same is a f ull v true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City � p Council of said City Y dul called and held on the date therein indieatede insofar as such minutes relate to certain amendments to the $2,184,100 Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Cottages of Maplewood Project - FHS Insured Mortgage Loan), Series 1989 WITNESS any hand and the seal of said City this qday of , 1989 City Clerk -3- i C7wsro ' MEMORANDUM Action by C o=c i i Endorsed- Tot ndorse-Ta_ Cy it Manager 111odified Director of Community Development Rejected FRDM : SUBJECT: R-3 District Date DATE s May 11 1989 .April,requested that part of the .City The City Council � on 20 , r Q starting code be presented for revew at each Council meeting, •. • _ multiple dwelling, district. The R-3. district �s with the R 3, m��l t �p he existing R-3 'hed along with a zoning map showing t � attar . 3 f existing and pl armed R-3 zones is districts . An inventory o de should be also o included Any proposed changes to the co referred to the Planning Commissions kd/R-3,mem Attachments is R-3 District 2. R-3 Inventory 3.9 Zoning Map (separate attachment) ZONING, 136.108 DIVISION 5. R-3 RESIDENCE DISTRICT (MULTIPLE DWELLING) Sec. 36-106. Multiple dwelling classircations. Multipletiple dwelling struct.unes penRitted within an R-3 R.esidenc e. District shall be classified as follows: Classification Structure containing R -3A .............. 3 do 17 unite R -3B .............. More than 17 unite R3_ C , * .. , ... , , . , , Townhouses, as defined in section 36- 124 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 906110.3-68) Sec. 36-107. Definition* of this division, "apartments" are defined as Eor the purposes multiple dwelling.structures consisting of at least three (3) attached dwelling units havingentrances from common hallways. (Ord. No. 4659 § 906.0009 4-19-79) Cross reference --Rules of construction and definitions generally, 11-41 et seq. ,r 01J. j Sec. 36-108. R-3 districts—Permitted uses. G - ZT • d ' District (Multiple Dwelling), unl other - In a -3 Residence Dis ( p • in this chapter, ter, no building or land shat ereafter be wise provi P or stru rally altered, except for one of a of the follow- ingerected Y uses: emit in divisions 3 an (1) All uses pe of this article, R-1 and R-2 Residence Dia ' ts, except ngle _famil y dwellings, du- plexes 8 or double bun ess specifically authorized by the city council. set forth ' sections 36-118 through (2) Multipledwellings, 36-123 36-120 of this divisidh (R 3A), sectio 36-121 through division A -3B), and sections -124 and 36-125 of of this d � ions of such this division 10C), setting forth the cl ficat dwell' s b size and by type. Any privilege cunduct busi- dwe 8 ulti le dwelling structures shall be li ited to such Hess lI1 tp P g orize at t time of business use as the council may auth approval of construction plans and specifications. \ . Supp.. No. 4 2223 I �z7 • District (single dwelling) 'tted in an R-1 Residence D . Yccassory ��se perms except* • -E Residence Estate District, P is rmitted In the R ( �) t'sed car lots. • including the sale of used ' n of automobiles or trucks (2) The recki 8 cars* � • prohibited in the R -E District. • ed us in the R-1 district is prop. Any' prohibited eb emended Section 3 6 (R-2, Doubl e Dwe ding District) is her y Section S. O,s follows : Section 3b-86 • Uses. � Permitted uses . The ons}� uses permitted in the R-2 Residence a. District are as follows 1. Any permitted itted us in the R-1 istrict. 2. Double dwelli gs• . s. The follo�•ing uses maypermitted by conditional . b. Conditional u use permit: Mt the R-1 District. ermitted by conditional use per 1, Any e P Section b. Se tion 36-94 is s added to the R-2 District Sec. 36-94, , Minimum floor areas. -- Residence District dwelling • floor area for each R 2 t er �f_ The lnimum habitable ed eighty (580} square fee p • be at least: five bund r g square feet per un shall Seven hundred forty (740) 'enc• or one -bedroom unit, ware feet per three-bedroom f ci y ht hundred sixty (860) sq wo-bedroom unit eight feet per four-bedroom unit. • sand forty (1,040) square •unit , one thou f llin District) is hereby amended Section 7. Section 36-108 (R-3 Multiple Dw e 8 as follows: Sec. 36-106. Uses* a as Permitted uses. The only uses permitted in the R-3 District ar a. Pe follows: •ngs including double dwellings • 1. Multiple dwel lo except single-family permitted n the R-1 Districts 2, Any use p i dwellings, .The following uses may be permitted by conditional b. Conditional uses* use permit: • erm't in the R-1 District 1. Any use permitted by Gond itlonal vs P xce t e hotel or motel. 2. Boarding or lodging house, � P 3. Nursing home. A-oh3.�.� t - ed use: a single-family dwelling* ♦ a amend as -25(Home Occupations) is hereby amSe tion 17 8. Sec. 17 21 to fol WS: Sects 17-21. License requirements. .. • require a license if any of a following •: (a) ome occupations shall Teq s each ar: • c rcumst ances would occur more than 30 day y 1. ployment of e nonresident in the home occ ation. 2. Cu\Stomers visiting the premises* e of products on the premises 3. Manuf �.ctur • ' ated wit the home occupation which 4. More tha one vehicle associ le. • ssif d as a light commercial epic is cla A vehicle(s) ,ed In the home occ ation, and parked on the premises, which exceeds a three- anter ton payload capacity. �:'subject to, but not ions re ulxing a llcen shall be J (b) Home occupations q limited to , the f of l owih2 require nts: • generate by a home occupation in greater 1, No traffic shall be � d in a residential volumes than would normall be expecte not ex - need of f -street parking shall - neighborhood. The for home occupa teed more than three of f ;*treet parking spaces spaces re- • � given time, n��addition to the parking spat tion at any 81 quired by the residents. nonresident employee shall be allowed to work on 2 , No more than one n ees who work off premises may be the remises. Non�rksldent emplo employee is parking P remises. I � an on-site employ allowed to visit OeP leave their vehicles on-site. ' off-site employees shall t 1 on-site. vehi le parked on-site, one off - if f there is no CM employee yehicle may be parked o -site. site employee • the home occ pation, including customers 3o Na vehicle 8,�sociated with o ees, shall be parked on the st et or Shall not OT employees, sidewalks or Y block svehicles used y the residents public easements. Private be included in this requirement. i� an twenty ( )percent of each area a u�valent to no more than shall be 4. An q house, including the basement an garage level/Of of the used l In the conduct of a home occupation. i ' ' ble off remises in he outside Th re shall be no change vi sl , p d i Cate the 5' � building or premises that would n appearance of the b g none si n m eting the onduct of a home occupation, other tha 8 fequirements of the City sign code. 36-108 U APLEWOOD CODE () 3 Civ lodges, fraternity and sorority ho s which do not offer p lic accommodations. (4) Boarding a lodging houses. (5) The followings pursuant special use permit granted by the council on a lication nd hearing -as provided 'in article III of this chapter: s. Hosp� • cline nursing homes and other building used for trey ent human ailments. b. Philanthropic and ch itable institutions. c. An of 'r use enumer ed or specified in article III of Y this apter relating to special use permits. (Code 1965, § 906.010; Ord. No. 245, § ��.10-3-68) Sec. 36-109. Same—Off-street parking. Each multiple -dwelling unit in the city shall have off-street P parkingspace. Parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not part of, the driveways or maneuvering space necessary to the parking areas serving such multiple dwelling. All parking spac- es driveways and other parts of the parking facilities shall be dust free and shall be surfaced with concrete or blacktop. Park- ing ar -ing requirements shall be as follows: 1� An o parking stall shall be a minimum distance of () Pen fifteen (15) feet from a dwelling unit window and five (5) feet from any side or rear property line. (2) Parking s may rkin stallnot be located within fifteen (15) feet of Y a street right-of-way, unless section 36-22 applies. ( a 3) Where garage or carport opens to a public street, the width of the driveway onto that public street shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall a series of garages open directly to that street. Where a series ofB arages face each other on a private road, the minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30) feet in order to provide visibility in backing out or turning around. (4) Parking shall also be in accordance with section 36-22. (Code 1965, § 906.070; Ord. No. 231, § 1,10-5-67; Ord. No. Supp. No. 4 2224 ZONING 136-111 245, § 4 (§ 906.030), 10-3-68, Ord. No. 555 § 2, 11.28-83; Ord. No. 585, § 5, 8-26-85) Sec. 86-110. Same -Indoor storage spaces. • undyed twenty (120) cubic feet of storage A minimum of one h n addition to normal closet space, shall be made available space, i dwellin unit. Such storage space shall be lo - for each multiple -dwelling or in the garage, sated in the same building as the dwelling unit 8 habitable area of a considered as part of the but shall not be dwelling unit. If located in the garage,it shall. be enclosed and shall not be part of the automobile parking area. (Ord. No. 245, § 5 (§ 906.040), 10-3-68; Ord. No. 577, § 1,1-28-85) Sec. 36-111. Same—Exterior surfaces. (8) All multiple dwellings s in the city shall be designed and con- structed tructed to have the equivalent of a front on each exterior surface. Supp. No. 4 2224.1 ZONING 136-114 (b) All accessory or ancilla buildings to multiple dwellings in �' i - the city, including garages and carports, shall be des gned and con structed to have substantially the same exterior surface as the prin- cipal use building. (Ord. No. 243, § 6 (§ 906.050),10-3-68) Sec. 36-112. Same—Accoustical controls, In n all multiple dwelling buildings in the city, the following stand- ards of accoustical control shall apply: ( 1) All plumbing g servin each unit shall be separated from other units by a room, closet, corridor or sound barrier. (2) party partitions and floor systems shall be of a type suffi- cient to accomplish a loss in sound transmission of not less than fifty (50) decibels determined by averaging the loss at frequencies of 125, 2509 350, 5009 7009 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 cycles. Corridor partitions shall be capable of accomplishing a loss in sound transmissions of not less than forty-five (45) decibels similarly determined. (Ord. No. 245, § 7 (§ 906.070), 10-3-68) Sec. 36-113. Saone—Garbage, refuse, etc., containers. All refuse, and d garbage containers serving multiple dwell- ings s in the cit shall be placed at the rear of the premises. In no event shall such containers be placed next to the ptreet or curb, nor shall the blaced so as to interfere with the use of adjoining propertyor to cause a nuisance or annoyance to adjoining property occupants. ants. Such containers shall be covered and maintained so as to be inaccessible to insects, vermin or animals, and shall be screened so as not to be visible from eye -level height. (Ord. No. 245, § 9 t§ 906.080),10-3.68) Sec. 36-114. Same—Density credits. All multiple dwelling structures constructed in the city are subject to minimum area and maximum density standards as set forth in sections of this chapter relating to density and area requirements. The following credits to such standards shall be allowed as follows: Supp. No. 2. 2225 136-114 MAPLEWOOD CODE and king The net acreage for calculating den - (1} Unaier Pte' re feet sity may be increased by three hundred (300) squa re kin space that is provided for each parking ided under the principal P manner under ound, which use structure, or ig?' n some other mann thereby rmit use of the grade level outside the build will the y pQ • above such underground space, for other building, ing, or a parking, open yard or recreation space. space. The net acreage for (2} Open spa calculating density may be increased by one hundred (100) square feet where twenty- five (25) Pe ipercent of the entire area is reserved n one area for recreationplay la area, or for open land, water or ponding areas subject PP b'ect to approval by the city council after consid- eration by the community design review board. ndsca ing. The net acreage for calculating density may (3) Ia F g s be increased by one hundred (100 ) square feet for each dg wellin unit where one percent of the construction cost (not including ludin land cost) is allocated to the planting of trees. This does not apply to the sodding or seeding of green areas. ' e. The net acreage for calculating density may be (4) High ria increased sed b one hundred (100) square feet for each dwell- ing unit above three (3) stories. In order to qualify for this 't all floors must have elevator service. If this credit, credit, when combined with others available in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this section, results in a reduction of yard or parking p kin space area below that otherwise required by reason ,of the dimensions and number of dwelling units in structure, then this credit shall not be allowed. (Ord. the stru � o. 245 1 10 (� 906.090), 10-3-68; Ord. No. 559, 1 12• N, 12-83) Sec. 36-115. Same --Certificate of occupancy - Before an)may be occupied by lanai , new multiple dwelling building in the city • is the owner or contractor shall first obtain from nc and such docu- ment building inspector a certificate of occupancy, certify that all requirements, specifications, special treat- - taent shall oe Y ordered or mems, screening, landscaping or any other prerequisite • nnin commission or the council have been fully !squired by the planning late. An unau- rovided or complied with and that all work is comp y p roved plans shall pre- thorized deviation or omission from city app Supp. No. 2 2226 ZONING 136-119 and thereby prevent the occu- Vtnt the issuance of such certificaterd. No. 245, § any tenants or residents. (O pancy of the structure by 114 906.100).10-3-68) Sec. 66.116.. Sam.ems--Sanitary sewer required; water connection8• • ill in the city, unless a sanitary No multiple dwelling shall be built .. Il be made • he determination of availability aha sewer is available. T ilable or requirements ava it engineer pursuant to demand by the city g Alla apartments shall be connected capable of being made available.p 12 906.110), p when available. (Ord. No. 245, 1 (§ too municipal water w jai -68) a and �agpole setbacks. $eC. 56.1 1 17. Radio toa►er, antenn • residential districts, citizen band radio towers, In all multifamily residentia flagpoles shall main towers, television antennas and flagp amateur rad rt lines. (Ord. No. 392, § 2 Q tain a five-foot setback from all property 906.120(a)),1.15 -?6) Sec. 56-118. R -SA multiple dwellings—Generally • a in the city having three (3) to Seventeen All multiple dwelling a swellings and are re - its are designated as R -3A multiple e (1?) un ovisions of sections 36-118 to 36-120 of quired to conform to the pr 0.3 •& Q i ' 'vision. (Ord. No. 245, § 13 (§ 906.200),1 this di Sec. 56.119. Sante --Density and area requirements. (a) Density. Except as otherwise modified or specified by terms variances rop�erlY considered and of this chapter' or because of V°`r i le dwelling shall con - he building site for any R -3A multiple allowed, t thousand, six hundred twenty-five list of an area of at least fifteen d the maximum S care feet. The density shall not exceed (15,62) aQ . density permitted by the land use classification andpeople Per unit designated . in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. um habitable floor area for each (b) Floor area The minim Ye hundred eighty dwelling shall be at least: fi R -3A multiple enc or one -bedroom unit; seven hun- (5$0) square feet per efficiency died forty (740) square feet per two-bedroom unit; eight hundred & pp. No. 2 2227 k J �6-119 MAPLEWOOD CODE • 0 square feet r three-bedroom unit; one thousand forty sixty (86 ) sq per (1,040) square feet per four-bedroom unit. . At least thirty - (c) Green area five (35) percent of the R-3A multiple dwelling site shall be retained for and devoted to green area; except that, adjustment may be allowed under certain clrcum- stances in connection with the administration and application of section 36-114 of this division. (d) Percentage for structure. The area covered by the R -3A build- ing in shall not exceed thirty-five (35) percent of the site area. (e) Fro y Front and requirements. Each R -3A multiple dwelling shall have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth facing any road or street. This setback shall apply to yards fronting on both streets where the building is located on a corner lot. (f) Side and rear yard requirements` (l) The minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for an R•3A multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet. (2) P Parkingspaces, garages, carports, or like structures shall be set back no less than five (5) feet from a side or rear property rty line and no less than fifteen (15) feet from a public street right-of-way. backs increased The minimum front, side and rear y {�) Set Zr tba for an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be increased of to � o exceed sev t -five (75) feet, by the most restrictive of a follow - 1 �xc Y e uireme where the lot abuts a farm resi ce, residen• ung r q tial estate, single d ing,. or double dwellin ntng district: (1) Building g ldin height: Th building settwAs, shall be increased two (2) feet for each on t th building exceeds twenty- five wenty-fve (25) feet in height. t2> Exterior wall area. Where an exterio faces residen- tiallY zoned property, the setback of the walls in- creased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet. or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) . square feet. ed R -3A multiple dwelling shall be erect jh) Height regulation. No P or structurally ucturall altered to exceed a height of thirty-six (36) feet from Supp. No. 2 2228 Y.. mss'# ORDINANCE N0. 633 • RFMI�fTS FOR INAHCE A��IDING RE�QUI 1 ORD Y40KE 3 LAND SETBACKS TO RESIDF�1'TIALL THE MAPL.EWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS • Subsection 36-27 (a) under landscaping and screening, is amended Sec on 1 • as fo's twent (20) f eet,-'fn width shall {a} A 1a copea of not less than y d are be provi where . . . 1 A nonresl den 1 use abuts a re entially-zoned property *" () . (2) A multiple dwelling u property art zoned for single or double dwellings. • hall not apple' where the The re uire is of this sub tions • s designated on 9 - oned property is be used ori S reside a ly z P P nresi ial use* t ity's land use plan for a no c -3 multi (g), under the R le district, is amended P Section 2. Subsection 36-119 as follows: ( ) Setbacks increased . g rear and setbacks for an R -3A The minimum front , side and •re y exceed seventy shall be increased , not to multiple dwelling s restrictive of the following five (75) feet , by the most abuts a farm residence, residen- . e uirements, where the lot ab zoning district: T q tial estate, single dwelling, or double -dwelling • setbacks shall be increased • Building height: ,The building exceeds twent�•- a. g two (2) feet for ea"ch one foot the building e five (25) feet in height. _ for wall faces residentially- Exterior wall area: where an exterior be .increased five b' he setback of the wall shall zoned property , t (19000) square feet, or part t for each one thousand (5) fee thousand (2,000) square feet* thereof, in excess of two • ch into a required setback mai. building addition which would encroach encroachment would. be (2) Abu 8 ermit, if such be approved by conditional use P ks and screened in a man` PP ro erty setbacks 3 consistent with surrounding p P w Board. At least 8076 to the Community Design Review residential property. .Her acceptabled from abutting of the addition shall be sGreene • shall not apply where the rest- � The requirement of this subsection designated on the Citi s (3) q is being used or is 8 dentially-zoned property use. land use plan for a nonresidential neighborhood commercial d1stlrct, -(d), under the NC. neighbon 3, Subsection 36)30 Sectio is amended as follows: - 1 - ZONING 136-121 grade, level measured from the front or.street side of such building. (Ord. No. 2451114 (1906.210),10-3-68; Ord. No. "8, § 11 7.20.78; Ord. No. 529, j 1,11-22-52; Ord. No. 551,1219-12-83) Sec. 56-120. Same—Two or more structures on one site. Where two (2) or more R -3A multiple dwelling structures are to be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall l to such buildings thirty-six (36) feet in height or less: apply than twice a No building shall be closer to another budding . e vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of the 8 Seventy-two (72) feet treasured from grade. (Figure A below) (b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty- six (36) feet measured from grade. Where both building ele- vations are windowless, this requirement may be reduced by one-third. (Figure B below) (c) Notmeasureding shall tfromoser to another grade (Figure, C below) twenty (20) fee rc ALI (Ord. No. 245, § 15 (§ 906.211)910-3-68) Sec. 36-121. R -3B multiple dwellings—Generally. dwellings in the city having more than seventeen All multiple. (17) units within one structure are designated as .R -3B multiple dwellings and ns d are required to conform to the provisions of sectio 36-121 to 36-123 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 16 (§ 946.300}, 10-3-68) Supp. No. 2 2229 f 86-122 NLAPLEWOOD CODE $ec. 36-122. Same --Density and area requirements. as otherwise modified or specified by terms (a) Density. Exceptrl considered and of this chapter, or because of variances properly n- ildin site for any R -3B multiple dwelling shall co allowed, the building twenty-five (15,625) 'st of at least fifteen thousand, six hundred Y • s, square feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum • density • e land use cla8sification and people per unit desig- perm�tted by � nated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan. (b) Minimum habitablefloor hinimum floor area for area The m each R38 multiple ul le dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty r efficiency or one -bedroom unit; seven hun- (�0) square feet per ht hundred dred forty (740) square feet per two-bedroom unit; eight duty (860) square feet per three-bedroom unit, one thousand forty (1,040) square feet per four-bedroom unit. • any R -3B he minimum land area for (e) Minimum land area T building lot weUin shall have at least one acre and the bui g multipled B shall have a width of not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. nt of the site shall least thirty-five (35) percent (d) Green area. At ' be retained for, and devoted to, green area; except that adjustment under certain circumstances in connection with the may be allowed administration and application of section 36-1.14 0f this division. 8 (e) Building round area. Building area may not cover more than thirty-five (35) percent of the ground area. requirements. The minim (f) Front yard req um front yard setback •rt 30) feet. This min- ian R -3B multiple dwelling shall be thirty ( . • be increased according to the provisions of imam setback shall aired to be su bsection 36-119(g). This setback shall not be required greater than seventy-five (75) feet. (g) ,Side and rear yard requirements. The minimum side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3B dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet, unless the lot multipled g abuts a farm residence, residential estate, single -dwelling wellin zoning district, in such ease, the mini- on double -dwelling according to the provi- sionssetback shall be increased a g of subsection 36-119(8). (1) Supp. No. 2 2230 ZONING 136-123 Regardless of building height or external wall area, the (2) Regard all not be required to be side. and rear yard setbacks sh greater than seventy-five (75) feet. (3) As Provided in subsection 36-119(f)(2). • ' n No R -3B multiple dwelling shall be erected (h) xt�� height of three (3) stories, or or structurally altered to exceed .a h g t whichever is greater, measured from the thirty-five (35) feet, front or street side of such building, unless granted a special use permit by the city • 't council. (Ord. No. 245, § 17 (§ 906.310,10.3.68, Ord. No. 448, § 1, 7-20-78. Ord. No. 5299 § 29 11.22.82; Ord. No. 551, § 3, 9.12.83) Sec. 56.123. Same—Two or more structures on oae site. Where two (2) or more R -3B multiple dwelling structures are to be erected on a single le site the following special requirements shall l to such buildings exceeding thirty-six �) feet in height: appy than .twice No building shall be closer to another building - (a) N g of the tallest building up to a maximum of .the vertical height 0 ne hundred (100) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below) • shall be closer to another building than thirty - (b} No building tease b one foot for Biz (36) feet, which distance shall inc Y each two (2) feet of height in excess of thirty-six (36) feet, up to a maximum distance of seventy-five (?5) feet of separa- tion from grade. Where both building elevations tion meas are windowless, thisone- , third. Example: 44' requirement may be reduced by - • h buildings, B = 40 of separation (Fig �g ure B below) • shall be closer to another building than twenty (c) No building b one foot for each (20) feet, which distance shall increaseY f thirty-six. (36) feet, up a feet of height in excess o four (4) maximum distance of forty (40) feet of separation measured from grade. Example: 44' high buildings, C = 22 of separa- tion. (Figure C below) M mpp. No.2 2231 136-123 MAPLEWOOD CODE s s A (Ord. No. 245, § 18 (§906.311),10-3-68) Sec. 36-124. R -3C townhouses --Generally. this section, townhouses are defined as mul- tiplethe purposes of attached ti le dwellin structures consisting of at least. three (3) P g 'n units with no one unit or major portion thereof directly dwelling , Y above or below an other unit. Such units are commonly described as row houses, patio homes or quads and are required to conform to the provisions of this section: regulation. Height regulations s (1) Height regu et forth in section g 36-119(h) of this division apply to all townhouses constructed in the city, unless varied by spec:.. use permit. fired re uirements; No townhouse structure shall (2) Area anQ be constructed in the city on an area of land less than four thousand (4,000) square feet per dwelling unit. no more than eight (8) dwelling units shall be included in a single struc- ture, P second dividing wall with separation of each unit by at least a one-hour fire rated material and with every being constructed of at least a two-hour fire rated material that extends two (2) feet above the roof and two (2) feet out from the front and back walls. The density shall not exceed the maximum density permitted by the land use classification an people ople pe r unit designated in the city's adopted com- prehensive om-prehensive plan. Supp. No. 2 2232 ZONING 18&125 1e floor �,e,a far each R•3C mul- t3) ' av�a � Unum (58x0) a� • be at jeep: five hun&ed e4htY tiPk forty en or omne-bedroom unit; seven h . • feet per eff� cY Wit• eight h s�' (740) e,qu►ae feet per two-bedroom � g dyed set r Wee - forty wait; nine hundred t8f'0) square � Pe Unit - one (940) square feet per four-bedroom f rty area. more than one principal use struc- (4) Common use a tote, yard areas ture is constructed on the same or contiguousits mmon use by occupants planned for co ants of all dwelling un ma be counted in computing required lots space per unit for Y townhouses. ' enta. Similar to section 36-119(e) of this (5) Front yard requirements. division, except that these shall refer to the total site devel- opment requirements and each dwelling unit May be UP to its articular property line with a garage, or carp° r'ti abutting P a private, not public, road. (6) Side yard requiremena total development a. As applied to the tsite, the side yardo tin width. shall be no less than twenty (20) fee . two (2) or more buildings or eight unite occur � b. mere shall be a on one lot, the sideyards ards between buildings minimum of twenty (20) feet. - . �, � applied to the total develop- ment site, the rear yard shall be a minim Ord. • Ord. No. 245, 1 19 (1906.400),10-3-68; feet in width. t 1 4-19-79; Ord. No. . 448 1 1, 7.20.78; Ord. No. 465, No 529, 13,11-22-82, Ord. No. 551, 14, 9.12-83) See. 36-125. Same --As part of planned unit development. with other types o Townhouses, together Rnf multiple dwellingt hall be eligible � dwelling attic. structures, or any combination of different • ble stru under this division, s tutee defined and classified put - and treated as a planned unit development to be Considered this chapter. (Ord. No. 245, to the rovisions oP pur- suant P f article V of th 120 3 906.410), 10-3-68, .Ord, No. 5599 1 2,12.12-83) Supp. Na 3 2233 SURVEY FOR R-3 REPORT Devel oiled Undevel oiled Location • Zone �.. Plan ---- Ac. Ac. (Vamp .Carp enteur, & Jackson R-3 RH 0 1 .6 .Larpent eur & Agate ,,t_3 RH 101 0 4-p1.e:•: idol phos St . R_3 RH 1 .q 0 Maple Manor . L,arp en t eur & , R-3 RH 392 D L.arpenteur East McMenemy Ct Road B and R-- 3 RM OS 3.6 0 Mississippi . Apartment s i Mississippi Edgerton & Rosel awri R-3 RH 2.0 0 Map a Manor Care Center • 5k il l man & A � rk:wri ht R-3 RM 7.4 G Tarry Town . S�; i l l man & Edgerton _ R 3 RH 12 m0 0Edgerton Highland 5�:: i l l man & Edgerton R-3 RH 3.8 0 Edgerton Manor Belmont & Bradley R-1 RM 6.1 Rosel awn & Arcade R-3 RH O.9 0 E,osel awn & McMenemy R-3 RM 2.3 3.5 Maple Val ley McMenemy South of F RM Cr 5s5 Bellwood McMenemy North of F FSM C � 4.6. 1_arP enteur r Larpenteur & Parkway _ R 3 R H �, , 8 0 Bennington .Wood Par -away Drive R-3 RH 0 20 .9 Golf Course Cty . Rd . C & Hwy .61 M-1 RM D 10+ - - Cty, Rd . D & Carey1 F RM 38+ --- _ - Heights Drive cty.R d .D & Hazelwood F DC D 80.2 Wo©dl ynn & Mck:.n i ght R-3 RM 2.9 4.8 Wood 7 yn n Heights TownhomeS Ct . Rd . D & Ariel F -PUD RM 0 31e3 amY lw� Ct . Rd . D & Mcr night F RM 0 .9 - sowY Wood ly nn & Ariel F-PUDRM Lyd.i a and Ariel F-P'UI) RH Radate & White Bear R-3 RM 'Rad at z -& White Sear R-3 RM -� & White Bear Radat,c. R-3 RIS CtY .Rd.. D , West of R-3 RH Sout h l awn G Park County fide D & 0 low S out h l awn R-3 RH fad at z & South 1 awn R -3C RM Mesabi F -PUD RL .Eleventh & Ariel F RH Cope : Atlantic R-3 RH Cape & Germain R --3C RM Sherren & White Bear R-3 RH Cope & Van DyV:.e R-1 RH Co . Rd . B & Van Dyke R-3 RM Co , Rd . B & Hazelwood R-3 RH Co . Rd . B & Hwy . 61 R-1 RM Co .Rd - B & English Rl -P'UD RM Burlington Northern R-2 RM & man Northern Pacific ° State Trail R-3 RH Frost & Clarence R-2 RM Frost & Walter R-1 RM Skillman & Clarence R-2 RM Sk- i 1 l man & English R-2 RM Frost & Birmingham R-3 RM 0 4.7 Cottages of G 1 ,? Maplewood 4.1 0 Concord i a Arms O.4 0 3-p1 ex 4.1 0 Lake Fridge 3.6 G Park 1 .8 0 low Sol ib.i Mapte.Ridge 0 2 . O - - G 1 ,? Brandt Project 1O .9 0 Maple N;nol 1 0 b .1 - ' 2.C .. 0 Mapl ewood Manor 3.6 G Map 1 e Park: Shore 1 .8 0 Maplewood Senior Care V w 0 3.O _ 4a2 0 Egad f ord , R i d er Adel Apts • t 2a4 04.5+ mom 0.". 4.3 - ~' 0 2a2 Sam 00.9 ew 0 2.3 0 2.8 0 3.8 - - O.5 0 Apt . ,garden tYPP ar ent eur & Clarence L. p R-1 RM 0 3.5± am- - Frost & English R-3 RM 0 9 . 5 -- - Frost Frank: R-2 RM 0 1 U .4 - - (includes 3 . acme ponding easement) Fr i sb i e &English R--3 RH 1 .O 0 English Manor .East Shore Drive R-3 RH 3.4 0 Park v i ew Ct . L.arpenteur & Century R-3 RH 0 9.5± Hi 1 1 -Murray H. S. t,arpenteur & F' -Pt. D RM0S 36.2 31 .6 Townhouses of McKnight of Maplewood & Maple Woods Estates Larp e nteur & Beebe R-3 RM 2.7 0 Southw i nds of Map ewood I Beebe -Road F R-3 , RM 0 15.7 Southw i nds of Maplewood II Holloway & Beebe F --PUD RM 12 ,1 0 Archer Heights Forest Green Hol i owaY & Furness R-3 RM 0 4.7 - - Holloway & Beebe R--3 RH 0 4.2 - - Lar Pen t eur & Beebe F RM 0 4.0 LarP enteur & Century R-3 RM 0 X0.4 OEM - Larpenteur & Sterling R-1 ,F RM 0 5 • 5 low 'Montana & Currie R-1 , PUD RM 2v5 0 Acorn Greenhouses . Condominiums McK'n i ght & Chicago R-3 RM 0 64.6 - -~ N.W. Railroad (Beaver Creel-:) .Ivy & Ferndale R-3 RM 0S � 10.3 0 Pondview Apts . .Ivy & Century R-3 RM 0 4.2 - - Caves Century Add ' n . R-1 , F RM 21w3 0 - -' g. Century R-3 RH 3.6 0Hawthorne Oakwood Manor � Maryland and & Ferndale F -PUL! RM 3.7 16.4 Seaver Creek Carriage Homes "lary 1 and & L.ak ewood R-3 RM C' 3�:� • 1 - K Mary7 and & Lakewood R--3 RM S .8 0 iiary l and W . of Lauf ewood R-` RM 0 14 Century Trailer Park R-39 �,5 0Rolling Hills �_1RM .5 Maryl and Trailer Farb:: Rr--3 St i l l water & Ferndale R-3 REQ O.3 0 Apt . , garden type Stillwater Ave. Q �-3 RH 11 t Silver Fridge Stillwater Road Maryland an d & Century Y R_ 1 RM1 ,3 1 .o Century East Stillwater Ave .& r R-3 RH 0 2 �.� Mc K%n fi g h t McKnight 7th & St i 1 1 water Rd . R-3 RH 0 � 4 ``' - .- Stillwater Rd g� 7th R-1 kH 0 2 . 4 - - Minnehaha u Century R-3 RH O .? 0 Apt. ,garden type Minnehaha & Cent"ry R-1 RH 0 6w6 Stillwater Rd & Bush R-1 RH 0 2s7 Q4 Carlton R-3 RH 0 4 .6 - momMinnehaha Minnehaha & Carl ton R-1 RH 0 1089 _ Conway & Ferndale R-3 RH 2eO 0 E�roo�:.v ew � Century R-3 RH 6.1 0 E�rook: v i ew Manor & Century Ridge Lower Afton Lforl and Road Lond i n Lane & F_FUD RM 9.6 0 Connemara Apts . Crestview Pond & McKnight _ R 3 RM 4 .? 0 McKnight T.Ho�tses t_ondin Lane & � FPULS RH 2 1 ,2 0 Mapl eh i 1 1 s Townhouses I & II Uorl and Road Mail and & Crestview F -PUD R-1 � 29.�' 1008 Crestview Forest TownDoseh Forest ..Hillwood & Dorl and F -PUD RL Crestview Drive & Londin Total s (Brand Total R -I RL 1 m5 3e9 458 w, 8 N 0 487.1 945.9 Linwood Htsm & Adrienne"s AddIn. MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Subj : City Survey Date: July 3, 1989 Introduction Ac I by Counoil g 41 Recreati "c erred o d dified,....... ]Rej ected..... Date -- At' the March 13.. 1989t City Council meeting, a discussion was held regarding the procudures for a Community Center Ref eren- dum and Park Improvements, As a result of that meeting, a packet of informational. surveys, which included samples from the City of White Bear Lake, Inver Grove Heights, and City of Shoreview, were distributed to the City Council and staff. On May 18th, the City Council approved the concept of a Community Survey and directed staff to meet with consultants to discuss the City's needs and to have a consultant present to the City Council their firm's process for a Community Survey* I Background At the June 2,, .1989, City Manager's morning staff meeting, it ,was decided to 'interview survey firms on June 20. The following firms were interviewed: Decision Resources - Dr. William Morris, Diane Traxler tk Associates of Minneapolis - President JoAnne Tomczak Minnesota Center for Survey Research - Nancy Davenport Anderson -Niebuhr Associates President Jack Anderson, Marcia Neibuhr Following the interviews and discussion by staff, it was decided to request Decision Resources return for a second interview on Friday, June 30. At the June 30th meeting with Decision Resources, staff reviewed the benefits and disadvantages of telephone surveys versusmail surveys. We reviewed the types of questions that would be in- cluded in the survey,, as well as. costs. The personal contact that is a part - of the telephone survey, which includes clarification of any of the questions, has some definite benefits over the mail survey, which also requires a great amount of time in follow-up. The cost for the mail survey versus the telephone survey is quite similar, due to the cost of postage and the amount of time in- volved in follow-up on mail surveys, The cost for telephone sur- veys, as performed by Decision Resources, is based on the number of question units, Some of the questions are considered full units, and in the case where there are sub -sections to a question or a multiple list of activities in a question (Do you partici- pate in baseball, soccer, softball, skating?) they are considered partial units. The basic cost for 400 households with sixty question units is $5,400. Additional question units are $90 each. We have invited Dr. Morris and Diane Traxler to be present at the City Council meeting of July 10 at 7:00 p.m, to furthr dis- cuss the method of surveying the city, costs, and to answer questions from the City Council. Recommendation It is recommended by staff that the firm of Decision Resources Ltd. be engaged as the Community Survey firm to do a telephone survey. Final survey questions will be reviewed by staff and Council. Cost of the survey will be a minimum $5,400, with additional costs to be approved by the City Manager, but not to exceed $10,000, Funds are to be provided from the Contingency Fund and assigned to the appropriate account, Action by . MEMnRANDUM Endorsed Modifis TO . City Manager Re j ecte� J:i rest or^ of Community tEFve Z op men t FROM: Date. SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Conditional Use Permits EIATE May 25, 1989 • - � that. the article in the. City Code ��oLiT'�C 31 tlte�':b�'1^ Bastian �n 1^eC�ll�_.t�'C� tt:a�llPr"i pertaini nc� to condition tal �.�se permits be revised. The a s �t1 t of CoUnc i member �i��t �. an's sUggpst :ions , bUt r,evisi ons are a r `e also 3 nc 1 «+fie s t a f f changes and some of the wording from the t ren _ te Pl ann ina Act. The changes are designed to p�opo_:d State e �. a �- s o hen and clarify the e►:: isting ordinance* F;ECCMMENDA T ION Approve the attacher ordinance . MEMG4 Attachmient : Ord i nance ORDINANCE NOG AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ARTICLE ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND THE DEFINIT113N OF "CONDITIONAL USE" The Maplewood City. Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. The definition of "conditional use" in section 36-6 (definitions) is amended as follows (deletions are crossed out and additions are underlined): Conditional use: "Conditional use" means a land use or development that would not be apgro2riate generally, but ma he allowed with appropriate conditions or restrictions as provided by official controls. er,.CePt*0n-Perffl*+.-8 Section 2. Article V. Conditional Use Permits is amended as follows (deletions are crossed out and additions are underlined): ARTICLE V CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Sec. 36-436: Purpose .-&"d-de++"+t+0"7 The 2urnose of a conditional use 2ermit is to 2rovide the with some discretion, based on s2eci+]'Lc standards in determinin-.2 the suitability- of conditional uses. The City is not ob-13[gaced to agprove such uses. T-wlwr*+ e -qemerw&:+y-riot-auit&WFe eon er Sec. 36-437a Conditional Uses. Conditional use permits may be issued by the city council for the ,following uses in any zoning district from which they are not perm i . teed and not spec i+ical ly y ohibited :-+ar-smy-of-the glob. +e4+&"*nV a i--P-,,Publ is util ity,, publ is service or publ is buil ding uses.--irr etmy-d +s+r+et !-when-+ attm d -t 0-b e-mee es gory -+er-the- Pub+ -i e 2.--3-.Mineral extraction 1 Heliport, library, community centers state -licensed day care or treatment center.- (unless exempted by state I church I hospital any institution of any educational 9 philanthropic or charitable natures cemetery, crematoryq mausoleum or any other place for the disposal of the human dead* 4. -S -.An off-street parking lot as a principal use in a commercial or industrial zoning districte 5.-6TPart,-portT*om of an apartment building for commercial-eim business use, intended for the buildingIs ,res idents _t such as drugstore, beauty parlors barbershop, medical office or -and similar use* 6.--7-.Pl anned unit developments (PUD) 7 .-B-. Construct ion on an out lot. Sec. 36-438. Planned unit developments generally; definitions purpose and intent; requirements; etcom (a) A "planned unit development" (PUD) is a development having two (2) or more principal uses or structures on a single parcel of land of at least five (5) acres.. A PUD may------ include townhouses, apartment projects involving more than one building, multi -use structures, such as a apartment building with retail shops at ground floor level and similar projectso A PUD may not be divided unless the density distribution approved in the PUD is assured a (b) It is the intention of this section and the other sections of this division relating to planned unit developments to provide a means to allow flexibility by substantial deviations-var+amees from the provisions of this chapter, including uses.; setbacks, height and other regal ations e Deviations, varirences may be granted for planned unit developments provided that: Certain regulations contained in this chapter should ide not appl.y to the proposed development because of the 'its unique nature .-C+-the-propesed devei-opfflemt7 , (2) The PUD They would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. (3) The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of K this chapters (4) The deviations-ver*emees would not constitute a significant threat to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of ed;jeeemt-or-nearby land .-Frotm be -detr +me"tft*-tO -the -he&:Fth T -98+etyT -more +-9-or -gem elm& + (5) The deviations verw+smees are required for reasonable and practicable physical development. and are not required sol ely,9 I for financial reasons. (c) The development shall conform to the plan as filed with the citys Any substantive changes in the plan shall require a recommendation by the planning commission and approval by the city council after a public hearing* Sec. 36-439. Out lots. (a) No building permit shall be issued for construction upon any an outlots except by conditional use permits (b) The city council shall not grant a conditional use permit for building upon any out lotg unless said out lot meets the following conditions: It meets the minimum size and frontage requirements provided for in this chapters (2) It +9-reedy-for-deYe+apmemt has the requisite public improvements. (3) The permitted density under this Code has not been transferred to another parcel and isq there+oreq sufficient to accommodate the proposed constructions (4) The out lot is not used for permanent common open space. (.5) The proposed construction can overcome or accommodate topographical problems and peculiar site characterist ics . Sec. 36-440. Appl ication . An application for a conditional use permit may be made by any *NNW person having a legal interest in the property described in the al2plic-ation. All applications shall be submitted made to the director of community development upon the form supplied by the city. The director shall not acce2t an application that is not • 3 completes Specific application requirements shall be as stated on this form, but shall include at least the fol lowin informations if__appiicable: Al I information reauired on the community des i -g -n review board app 1 icatione 2,w Written_ 'gisti+ication for an BUD deviations w .30 An abstractor*% cert if icate showin2-- i3roperty owners' names and addresses within 350 feet of the boundaries of the .00..M� 2rolperty for which the P rmit is requested* 4a Any other information required bythe director of commun development_t t . he city council or the council -s advisory bodies The appl icant shal I al so,, at the time of f il ing such appl icat ion pay a fee to the director of community development to defray administrative expenses incurred by the city in the handling of the application, which fee shall be established by the city council by ordinance from time to time. P1-rrrt T -Sha" +M9 -t he-k+"d-of-Cand +t+Omft i- -use -Proposed 7 -it 9 - i-ee at M err -the --Property 7 -I -qtr 6seep +M9 -and -seree" in 9 -+mp r evementsT at M lo+--Ut+ -and-egress -+ram -Puhr 3-+e rmerds--. e -pi-sm i -y -im+th -eo-i- -bu i 4-d+rrej -and -rem fa -cgU+fttrorts requ+red-by-the-c-+ty-7 uhf-coar�ctf--miry-+corgi*t*en-the-granttrtg-of-the-Permit-sport et dhelftemee-te- th e-s+te-p +am -app roved -at -t he -P ttb +*e -h ear*M9 -+E3tmd No-.-'595-GS-2jI-?4-f3-3* Sec. 36-441. Procedures After an application has been submitted the director of community development shall prepare ' a report and recommen- dation and submit it to the planning commission and community design review boardasa2gropriate . for a recommendation to the city council& The -planning commission and community design -review board shall take action on the ion within sixty days of their respective hearin dates, unless an extension is --a22roved in writing by -the applicant. The staff re ort and the planning commission's and community design review board's recommendations arnei staff -report shall then be forwarded to the city council. Cb) The city council shall hold at least .one public hearing on each application for a conditional use permit. This hear U shall not be held until the council has received written recommendations or re, orts from the city staff--. plannin% commission and community desi2n review board or until 60 days have ela.p sed from the res gective hearing datess The director of community development shall have *+ter a notice of the hearing has-been published in the official .newspaper at least ten (10) days before said hearingal The director city-eattrve++, shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property +aeeted -with *n-the-ett Y within three hundred fifty (350) -feet of the boundary lines .of the property upon which such use has been reques.tedg which notices are to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at I east ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. Such notice shall include the date., -.-t ime and -place of the hearing and shall describe the conditional use reguest. Failure of prol2erty -owners to receive notice shall .not invalidate any of the proceedings in this section. (c) The council may -refer the a ication back to the 21 anni commission when the council finds that spgci+ic questions,o- 2n+ormation that may affect .the final decision were no 0 commission.t *r considered by the 2tannin g commission. This procedure Afl- Ksti only be used once for each aMlication s Id) The city -council may approve, ---amend or deny-- an MPI-ication for a.conditional use 2ermit by a majority voteb .(e) All decisions by the city ---- count i I shal I be f inal excep:t that any erson ag2rieved by a decision may-, within thir days -of the decision, appeal to the county -district court Sec .36-442 Standards. e ++-me Y-9 ramt -S-C end+ t +OMS+ -Use-pe"* t -by-& tna�erttq-dotes :• *b+--Approv tend i e +e++O"+Mq-+iMd+MqSON0E& t al A conditional use germit may be approved. amended or denied based on the fol I owing standards f or approv royal , -in addition to any standards for a specific conditional use found in this chapte r: 44+--ThOM+OIMffl*tY- "+th -the- e+t Y -L 9 -e OMPIMeh ens ive chaRter 5 "el-fere 49+ The use wool d she++ be I ocated I designed I maintained constructed and operated to be in conformity eafflPSt*b+e with the city's comprehensive ve i 2 h 1an and Code of Ordinances. eaimseter-of-thst -Z art tftqa (2) The. use would not change the existing --or P-lanned character of the surrounding areas (3) 44+ The Use would she++ not depreciate property values& (4) --+S+ The use would she++ not involve any- act iv 2rocess, materials. _--eguiRmen t or methods of oR ration that woul.d be dange„mous hazardous, detrimental cyr disturbing or cause a.nuisance to any---- erson or Droperty because. of ""a"Md+"9_+SMd_"sesTes, cessive noise, glares smokes dust, odor., -fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisancess (5) *6+ The use would she++ generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would she++ not create ,traffic congestion or unsafe access or-park+ftg-meeds th-at-wi++-eeuse-emd"e-bu on extisting or proposed streets* (6) 47+ The use would she++ be served by d ea uat a essemtisi- public facilities and services, nc 1 ud i,ng Such -ors streets, police and fire protection, drainage structuresq Vater and sewer systems-, schools and parks* (7) +8* The use would she++ not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or and services. (8) 49+ The use would she++ maximize the preservation of p"semve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic -Features into the development design. (9) *+0* The use would shai4 cause minimal adverse environmental effects e (10) +++* The city council may waive any of the above requirements for a public building or utility . structure, provided the council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between governmental units of the state would be best served by such waivers MIII (b) The al2pl icant shat I have the burden of proving that the use -woLtl d meet al I of the standards reguired for -ap roval of a conditional use Rermits The city may require that the applicant provide at his or her costs any ormat i on... I n ,studies or ex ert testimony necessary.to establish whether �these standards would be met or to establish conditions for approval Sec. 36-443. Conditio*nse *e+ The city council in granting a conditional use perm., its may impose attseh-to-the-perm*tsuch conditions and gctarantees as -may -be that it considers necessarys and as supported bv the record of the proceedings. to protect .adjacent 12rop'erties and the _.publ ic interest and to achieve the oals and objectives of the comlocehensive.olang Far -+-he p -safety-emd-v#e++sre-- ---Tine (b) Conditions and guarantees may ---includebut are not I imited to, the +ollowing -:-- Control I ing the numberarea, bul k, , h.eic-;.ht-.,. illumination and location of such uses. (2) Regulating access to the.Rroperty-I with j2articular reference to vehicle and ---pedestrian safety- and convenience, traffic control and emergency- vehicle access. (3) Regulating off —street parking ---- and loading- areas.2_ including the number and width of park- inci-spaces o (4) The location and design -of utilitiesincl udin drainage. (5) Berming. fencing. screening -And 1andscal2ing. incl udin underground Mrin-koling (6) Com 2atibility of appearance with surrounding - land uses. (7) Preservation of the site's natural i -historic and scenic + eat, ures in the development desi Limitin!3-the numbert size location or lightingo+ signagel- notwithstandin% the pro -visions of Article III (sign ordinance) a (9) The location g men sions and upk-eep of open spaces 7 Increasing reguired lot size and dimensions or, setback requirements (11) compliance with any plans, Dresentedo (12) A time I imit for review of the permit.. 13) A written ag eement, gash escrow. --letter of credit or other guarantee to insure that the 2rglect will be built as app oved.. (14) Restrictive covenants Sec. 36-444. Start of construction or use. 46*- The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may grant one six-month extension of the permit if just cause is shown. This requirement shall not apply to PUDs with an approved phasing plane Such extension shall be requested in writing and f it ed with the director of community development at least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the original conditional use permit. There shall be no charge for filing such petitions The request -for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or Utilize the use permitted in the conditional use permits re"Miss i-em-+OM-ft -recomme"dat+OM -and -to -the -C+tY-eOU"C+ +-f-er Sec ..36-445. Permit durations (a) +e* Al I conditional use permits shal I be reviewed by the council within one year of the date of initial approval unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one-year reviewq the council may specify an indefinite term or spec i f i c term not to ex teed f i ve (5) years, for subsequent reviewse The council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviewss (b) A conditional use permit sh-all remain in effect as long as. the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the Agreed upon conditions and is I ater al I owed because of the city enacting or . amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming uses Sec. 36-445. Permit termination g suspension or revisions 8 (a) ff+ The council may sus;end or drpon-reatew i terminate the permit if the approved conditions fnsy have been violated or the use is no longer in effect. Where the construction of a epeers+ building or structure of a monetary value in excess of $1003000 has been Permitted, the council shall provide fora period of amortization of not less than five (5) yearsWhere public teal th , safety and welfare concerns are threatened., the ..five-year amortization period i s not required and t h e council may determine the amortization period, if any, to be allowed. The groj2erty owner of the property ul2on which t h e cond i t i ona 1 use erm i t was issued shall be notified in writing at least ten days before the meet i n . I f the ro osed termination is based on a violation of cond i t i ons the-2-roperty owners within 350 feet shall also b e notified The director of community deve,l 02 ent may issue ,s_ogorder for work in Pro2ress until the counc i i hears the matter. (b) #gf~ In the event the council in its review process decides to consider i mposi. nig additional conditions ,-or-term rrat�ror of--r�-coRd�t rar�s�--t se-perTrt , the city council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit, -sf ter-e�--nottce-.o+ thre-hear +M9 -has -e�rst-Cert-f +9* -d rys-before-sard-hteartrg : The council shall s+ -so cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the boundary lines of the property, upon which such use has been established; which notices are to be mailed to the 1 ast known address of such owners at least ten (10) days before the date of the. hearing. Sec. 36-446. ReaQ Q 1 i c at i on . fh+ Whenever an application for a conditional use permit has been eemsidered-arid denied by the city council, a similar application effecting substantially the same property shall not be considered again by the city for at least one year from the date of its denial , unless the council directs such reconsideration by at least four (4) votes. �ti---Aft-certdtttens�--uses-sh�tf}-�omp�y-with-the-req�ttre�nent s ef-szctton-S6 :6-sntf-sny-other-sppfresb�e-ordtnsr�ce-of rho-c�tq � --fin-order-to-cfeterfitrte-Hhether-t�-proposed--tt�e �z�f-Conforfi-to-the-regatrements-of-this-seottort ;-tl'te ce�rtot�-rns�r-obtain-s-gaaftfteci-co�sttftsnt-to-tcstrfq :--- �he-�rppfzosnt-shs�f-be-�tsbfe-for-the-cost--of -the con�r�t�tsRtls-ser�rrces Sec. 36-447. 443 Conditional uses to conform to terms and conditions attached to granting of permit. 9 Any use permitted under the terms of any conditional use permit shat I be established and conducted in conformity with the terms and conditions of the permit. Any change involving structural alterationg enlargements intensif icat ion of use or simil ar change not speci+ ical I Y permitted by the conditional use permit +99tied shall require. an amended permit and all procedures shal.1 apply as if a new permit were being issueds All uses existing at. the time .o+ adoption of this article-�►tr t +t ed- -use peill6m+t shat I I be considered a . s having a conditional use permit which Contains conditions which permit the land use and structures as they existed on said date. amd Any enlargement, structural alterations or intensification of use shall require an amended conditional use permit as provided for aboves Sec. 36-448. 444 Records. The director of community development shall maintain a record of all conditional use permits issuedg including information on the use, location., conditions imposed by the councils time limits, review dates and other information as may be appropriates Sec. 36-449. 445 Fil ing of permit A certified copy of any resolution approving a conditional use permit shall be filed with the, county recorder or registrar of titles. The resolution shall include the legal description of the property. -rnc+aded7 Failure to file does not effect the validity or, enforceability of the permit" Secs. 36-450 446--36-460. Reserveds Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publications Passed by the Maplewood City Council on 9 19890 Attest: City Cl erk Ayes -- Nays -- 10 Mayor