HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 06-22 & 06-26 City Council PacketZ
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
4:30 P.M., Thursda June 22, 1989
and
60*30 P.M.. Monda June 26, 1989
Meetin No. 89-14
A. CALL TO ORDER
B* ROLL CALL
Co APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meetin No. 89-3 (Februar 13, 1989)
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Claims
2. Bud Transfer - 1988 Audit
3. Bud Transfer: Surve LELS; TSP
0 9
4. Final Pa Geranium-Ferndale Storm Sewer, Project 87-20
5. Cit Hall Maintenance Bud - Repair and Maintenance of Buildin and Grounds
6. Conditional Use Permit Renewal; 831 No. Centur Avenue - De
7. Bud Transfer - Clean Up and Demolition Costs
8. Housin Assistance Loan Pro
9. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1201 Frost Avenue (S & S Auto)
10. Tax Forfeited Land: Gall Avenue and, Lakewood Drive
F. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Insurance
Go UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Update of Cit Hall Expansion Plans and Architect Contract
2* 1990 - 1994 CIP (4 Votes)
3. Revocation of Permit,* Hause
4. Southlawn Drive Traffic
5. Code Amendment - Pipeline Setback (2nd Readin
6. Pipeline Setback Reduction: Junction Ave. (Heroff)
7. Pipeline Setback Reduction** Maplewood Meadows (Mo
8. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 2095 Larpenteur Avenue (Delor Co.)
9* Code Amendment: Occupanc Permlits (2nd Readin
10. Schedule Mee with Mana
H. NEW BUSINESS
1* Schedule of 1990 Bud Meetin
2. Proposed Settlement - Ser
3. Re to Promote Police Officer to Ser
4. Replacement of Clerk-T
5. Re to Hire Police Officer
6. Brooks Avenue Pro 88-08 *0 Schedule Assessment Hearin
ire rr�.rrrrr�r�r
7. Count Road C Water Project 88-10 - Schedule Assessment Hearin
8. Southlawn Drive Project 85-17 - Chan Order No. 3
9. Gervais Avenue Project 88-14 Chan orders
10. Brush Disposal Da
11. Variances and Variations
12. Amendment of the Sewer Element of the Comprehensive Plan (4 Votes)
I. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
20
3.
40
5*
6 0
7 9
80
90
100
J. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Code Review.* R-3 District
2*
30
4
50--
K. ADJOURNMENT OF June 22, 1988 MEETING
L* RECONVENE: CALL June 26, 1989 MEETING TO ORDER - 6:30 P*M0
M. ROLL CALL
NA UNFINISHED BUSINESS
lo 1988 Annual Financial Report and Audit
2. Assessments: Geranium/Ferndale Project 87-20
PUBLIC HEARINGS
19 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Termination: 1014 Bartelm Lane (Andrea)
29 7*o10 P*M., Code Amendment: Gara Sizes (2nd Readin 4 Votes)
3o 7:20 P*M,, Code Amendment,* Off Street Parkin ( 2nd Readin 4 Votes)
49 7:30 P.M., Lot Split and Variances: 1255 Riple Avenue (Aliperto)
5e 7:40 P*M*., Duluth and Count Road C (Goff)
a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes)
b. Rezonin (4 Votes)
6. 70#50 P.M., Duluth St. (Rainbow Cleanin
a* Communit Desi Review Board Appeal
b. Conditional Use Permit
7o 8:00 P.M. Li License: Fox and Hounds (Godbout)
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
P. ADJOURNMENT OP June 26, 1989 MEETING
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 13, 1989
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 89 - 3
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
Be ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present
George F Rossbach, Councilmember Absent
C. APPROVAL.OF MINUTES
Meeting No. 88 - 26 (October 24, 1988)
1. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meetin No. 88 -26 (October
24. 1988) as submitted.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the ,Agenda as amended:
1 Menards
2. City hall Art
3. Noise Abatement Ordinance Section 401
4. Cable
5. Open Space
6. Taxi Cab: .Howe Occupation Permit
7. Rap id Oil
� f
Mr. . is � :: �.:: r.
8. Daffodil Days
Seconded by Councilmember Juker.
Ayes - all.
E. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Anderso moved, Seconded by Councilmember Juker, Les - all, to approve
the Consent A enda, Items 1 through 18 as recommended: -
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 337 Checks #8665 - #8740
Dated 01 -12 -89 thru 01 -31 -89
58,712.88 Checks #5529 - #5636
Dated 02- 13--89
$ 9 2 ,148.9 6 Checks #5646 - #5719
Dat.ed 2-1.3--89
$ 488, 028.14 Total per attached voucher /check register
PAYROLL
$ 349, 092.75 Payroll Checks
$ 74, 079.65 Payroll Deductions
$ 423 * 172.40 Total Payroll
$ 911 20 0.5 4 GRAND TOTAL
2. 1989 Park & Recreation Fee Schedule
Adopted the 1989 Fee Schedule for Reservation of Park Facilities,
3. 1989 Park and Recreation Commission Activity Report
Accepted the Park and Recreation Commission Activity Plan for 1989.
4. Final Plat: Huntington Hills South 2nd Addition
Approved the following recommendations:
1. Approve the Huntington Hills South Second Addition final plat to create 27
single- - dwelling lots and an outlot.
2. Approve a one -year time extension for the unplatted portion of the Huntington
Hills South preliminary plat, subject to the original 8/24/88 preliminary
plat conditions that still apply:
a. City Engineer approval of final grading, utility, drainage, and erosion
control plan. These plans shall include the following:
(1) The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad
elevation and contour information for each home site, as well
as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing
styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites
that contain desirable mature trees and steeper slopes.
Deviation from the approved grading plans for each lot may be
2 2 -13 -89
permitted by the City Engineer, provided the intent of the
overall grading plan is complied with.
(2) The proposed building pads for the effected lots shall comply
with the requirements of the pipeline setback ordinance. .
(3) The recommendations in the Soil Conservation Service's letter
of 6 -5 -87 shall be followed.
b. Until Sterling Street is guaranteed to be constructed north of Linwood
Avenue, the areas either side of the Sterling Street right -of -way shall
be platted as outlots.
c. The right -of -way for "Spring Side Court" shall be extended to the west
property. line. If the property to the west (2437 Linwood Avenue) does
not develop at the same time as this site, a temporary cul -de -sac shall
be constructed entirely on the subject site. When the property to the
west does develop, the owner shall be responsible for constructing the
entire permanent cul -de -sac and for sodding the yard area on this site
encroached on by the temporary cul -de -sac.
If the applicant and the owner of 2437 Linwood Avenue
cannot agree on the location for the permanent cul -de-
sac bulb, the City engineer shall decide.
d. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement for:
(1) The construction of Spring Side Court. If Spring
Side Court will have a temporary cul -de -sac bulb,
a recording easement shall be submitted for the
area outside of the right -of -way to be dedicated
in the plat.
(2) All required utilities, except those to be con-
structed by the City as part of the Sterling Street
improvement .
' diced for an eight -foot -wide trail to Vista Hills
Park from Ma rnie Street located in the Huntington
Hills South Addition, if not completed prior to
requesting final plat approval for the Third Addition*
Resolution 89 - 2-- 7
WHEREAS, Hillwood Drive from Crestview Drive to Sterling Street
is designated a collector street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY
COUNCIL that the north side of Hillwood Drive from Crestview Drive to
Sterling Street be designated "No Parking."
3 2 -13 -89
5. Final Plats: Gonyea's 3rd through 5th Additions
Approved the Gonyea's Oak Heights Third Addition final plat.
Approved the Gonyea's Fourth Addition final plat,
Approved the Gonyea's Oak Heights Fifth Addition final plat.
6. Joint Resolution of Appreciation
Resolution 89 - 2 - 8
WHEREAS, James R. Kochsiek became a member of the Community Design
Review Board of Maplewood on July 8, 1985, and has served faithfully in
that capacity;
WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without com-
pensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has con-
sistently contributed his leadership and effort in many ways for the
benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City
of Maplewood, Minnesota, and the citizens of the City, that James R. Kochsiek
is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his
dedicated service and we wish him continued success in the future.
7. Linwood Heights Townhouses: Boarding Up Costs
Resolution 89 - 2 - 9
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 463.161, the City
of Maplewood has the authority to assess the costs of correcting a
hazardous condition on a building; and
WHEREAS, the townhouses at 657 and 659 Dorland Road have been left
vacant and unfinished because of bankruptcy proceedings; and
WHEREAS, these units have become a hazard and a nuisance; and
WHEREAS, the City caused these units to be boarded up at a cost of
$173 15.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to
the County Auditor the amount of $173.15 to be collected with property
taxes beginning in 1990 and each subsequent year until 1995, subject to
8% interest per annum, for the following described property:
Lots 2 and 3. Block 14, Linwood Heights
4 2- 13-89
8. Budget Transfer: Deputy Registrar Office
Approved a 1989 budget transfer of $1,600.00 from the General Contingency
Account to the 101- 302 - 000 - 4630 Acc ount in the Licenses and Records
Division, for the purpose of automating the Motor Vehicle transaction
proc
9. Carryover of 1988 Appropriations to 1989
Approved the following:
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION AMOUNT ACCOUNTING CODE FOR
GENERAL GG�ERSJMENT'
City Council
$ 1, 495
101 101 - 4630
Enhanced audio /visual
equipment for council
chambers
City Manager
810
101- 102 -4630
Additional cost of
personal computer for
.MIS Coordinator
Miscellaneous
4
405 -4630
Remaining costs to
complete the
installation of the new
computer system
CITY CLERK
Elections
600
101 304 - 4640
Telephone for the deaf
PUBLIC SAFETY
Administration
1,980
101 -401 -4630
Fax machine
1
101- 401 -4640
Personal computer
Police Services
6,400
101- 402 -4640
Mobile data terminal
Dispatching
6,210
101 -406 -4640
Coaxial cable from rat
room to radio tower
3
101 --406 -4640
Radio antenna and filter
2
101 -406 -4640
UHF radio receiver and
monitor
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration 60 101 -501 -4490 First part of a two- -year
storm water study to be
done in 1989
5 2 -13 -89
Engineering 350 101 - 501 -4490 Drafting table
Water System 60 201 -510 -4470 Water tower painting
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Administration 9 101 -701 -4490 Planning consultant
$157.980
10. 1988 Budget Changes - Internal Rental Changes
Approved the following- budget transfers to finance the 1988 V.E.M. Fund rental
charges
12. Financial Transfers to Close Debt Service Funds
Approved closing of the Debt Service Funds for the 1967 and 1968 GO Bonds by a
transfer of their remaining balances to the C.I.P. Fund effective December 31,
1988.
13. Financial Transfer to Close Project 85 -07
Approved a 1988 transfer of $39, 796.99 . from Project 85 -07 to Project 83 -010
14. 1988 Tax Increment Transfers
Authorized the following 1988 transfers from the Tax Increment Fund:
To Public improvement Projects Fund:
$184 for Project 85 -17 (Southlawn Avenue)
112.070 for Project 81 -20 (McKnight Road)
6 2 -13 -89
Transfer from (To)
Contingency Account
502
Street Maintenance
$(22
503
E ginee.r.ing
( 2, 900)
504
Public Works Building Maintenance
( 100)
601
Parks & Recreation Administration
( 2,980)
602
Parks Maintenance
34,320
603
Recreation Programs
C 7 , 900)
741
Community Development Administration
( 280)
702
Planning
( 280)
703
Building Inspections
1
704
Health Inspections
( 280)
Net Amount to Contingency Account
$( 1
11. Financial Transfer to Close Project 87 -31
Approved a 1988 transfer of $4,645.68 from the
General Fund to the Public Improve-
ments
Projects fund to finance the engineering
feasibility study costs for Project
87 -31.
12. Financial Transfers to Close Debt Service Funds
Approved closing of the Debt Service Funds for the 1967 and 1968 GO Bonds by a
transfer of their remaining balances to the C.I.P. Fund effective December 31,
1988.
13. Financial Transfer to Close Project 85 -07
Approved a 1988 transfer of $39, 796.99 . from Project 85 -07 to Project 83 -010
14. 1988 Tax Increment Transfers
Authorized the following 1988 transfers from the Tax Increment Fund:
To Public improvement Projects Fund:
$184 for Project 85 -17 (Southlawn Avenue)
112.070 for Project 81 -20 (McKnight Road)
6 2 -13 -89
To Park Development Fund :.
$ 96 i 100 for Project 308 (Hazelwood Park)
47 y ^00 for Project 309 (Playcrest Park)
62, 500 for Project 321 (Sherwood Park)
$551 Total
15. Annual Street State Aid and Sewer Fund Transfers:
Authorized the following 1988 transfers:
(A) From the Street Construction State Aid Fund to the Public Improvement
Projects Fund for the following projects:
$581 87 -45 Sterling Street and Schaller Drive
65,000 86 -22 Hillcrest Trunk Sanitary Sewer
3 86 -25 County Road C - White Bear to McKnight
$649 Total
(B) From the Sewer Fund to the Public Improvement Projects Fund for the
following projects:
$279, 86 -22 Hillcrest Trunk Sanitary Sewer
1, 86 -25 County Road C - White Bear to McKnight
$280 Total
16. Budget Change for City Hall Expansion
Approved that the 1989 Budget for the City Hall Expansion be reduced by
$1300.00 and the 1988 Budget be increased by $13000000
17. Waive Fees: Emergency Fund Service
Authorized the waiving of fees for special food license and the fleet license for
the trucks as requested by Emergency Fund Service, 1140 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood.
18. Police Civil Service Commission Vacancy
Authorized Staff to advertise for interested candidates to apply for the Police
Civil Cemr.,i.ssion vacancy.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional use Permit Revision and Renewal: County Road C (N.W. Bell)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Northwestern Bell Telephone /U. S. West for a revision and renewal of a condi-
tional use permit. The revision is necessary because the legal description of
the site has changed due to the applicant's purchase of all of Lot Four.
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.'
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal.
7 2 -13 -89
d. Commissioner Bob Cardinal presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Board Member Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board recommen-
dation.
f. Alma P. Fitzrt of f , Assistant Manager -Real Estate, U.S. West, spoke on behalf of
their request.
g. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following expressed their views: a.
David Fenner, 824 County Road C
h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
89 - 2 - 10
WHEREAS, U . S . West requested a revision and renewal of a conditional use
permit to construct a telephone equipment building at the following- described
property.,
Lot 4, Block 1, Gonzalez Addition
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. This conditional use permit was originally approved by the Maplewood City
Council. on December 9, 1985. The City Council renewed this permit for two
years on December 8, 1986.
2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on February 13, 1989, to
consider a revision of this permit. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given
an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning
Comtri:� s s i on .
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THt MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above -
described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the follow-
ing findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the
purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The eatablisirient or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be com-
patible with the character of that zoning district.
8 2 -13 -89
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to .present
and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general
unsl.gh -liness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only .minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and shall not create - traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs
that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets,
police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public
cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental
to the welfare of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
100 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to adherence to the site plan, dated September 19,
1988, unless a change is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
j . Gouncilmember Anderson moved that the back portion of the property be left in
its natural state.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
2. 7:10 P.M., Street vacation: Oak Avenue
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
request of dean Carpenter and City Staff to vacate Oak Avenue between Ariel and
German S c _A�-.
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
proposal.
d. Commissioner Bob Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
e. Jean Carpenter, the applicant, spoke on behalf of her request.
f . Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard.
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
9 2 -13 -89
h. Counc ilmemb er Juk er introduced the f oll owin resolution and moved its adoption:
89 -2 -11
WHEREAS, Jean Carpenter and the City of Maplewood initiated proceedings
to vacate the public interest in the Oak Avenue right -of -way, located between
the westerly right-of-way line of Ariel Street and the easterly right -of -way
line for German Street.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street
right-of-way have signed a petition for this vacation;
2. This vacation was reviewed by the ,Planning Commission on January
12 1989, The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that
this vacation be approved.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on February 13, 1989, to
consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given
an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City
Staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described street right- of-way, public
interest in the property will accrue to the following - described abutting proper-
ties:
Lots 1 through 15, Block 4, and Lots 16 through 30, Block 1,
Maplewood Addition North St. Paul
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in
the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the
following findings of fact.
1. The adjoining property owners have no interest in improving the
street.
2. The adjoining properties have adequate street access.
3. This street segment is not needed for area traffic circulation or
emergency vehicle access.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
30 7:20 P.M., Street Vacation: German Street
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of
10 2 -13 -89
Hillcrest Development to vacate German Street between Cope Avenue and Castle Drive.
They wish to create four small lot, single dwelling properties along the north side
of Cope.
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal.
d. Commissioner Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
e. Mayor Greavu . called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following expressed their opinions:
Ruth Lang, 2227 German Street
Gary Gerke, 1252 Cope Avenue
f Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its ado Lion:
89 -2 -12
WHEREAS, Hillcrest Development initiated proceedings to vacate the
public interest in the German Street right -of -way located between Castle and
Cope Avenues.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street right -of-
way have signed a petition for this vacation:
2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on .January 12,
1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that
this vacation be approved
3. The City Council held a public hearing on February 13, 1989, to
consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and
Planning commission.
WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described street right -of -way, public
interest in the property will accrue to the following- described abutting
properties:
1. Lots 1 and 30, Block 10
2. Lots 15 and 16, Block 11
3. Lot 30, Block 7
4. Lot 16, Block 6
11 2 -13 -89
All in Dearborn Park, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on
the basis of the following findings of fact.
1. Traffic from the BW, business warehouse planned
portion of this property ahould. be discourage f rom
traveling through the RM, residentia.l medium. and RL,
residential low density planned areas to the south.
2. There is no public need for this street right -of -way.
3. All adjoining property can be adequately accessed from Castle or Cope
Avenue.
This vacation - s subject to the retention of a utility easement over the
west 33 feet of the entire right -of -way to be vacated.
Seconded by. Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
4. 7:30 P.M., Conditional Use Permit or Rezoning: County Road D. Maplewood Knoll
Apartments (4 votes for Rezoning) .
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of
N. Walter Goins to approve a conditional use permit to construct a multiple dwelling
complex on property zoned (BC) Business- Commercial.
b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal.
d. Commissioner Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
e. Mike Podelwiltz, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal.
f Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following expressed their views:
Ken Bowser, 1765 E. County Road D
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this item until the property owners can
meet and reach an agreement.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian.
Councilmember Bastian withdrew his second.
Motion died for lack of a second.
i. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item for two weeks and refer it to Staff
12 2 -13 -89
for further investigation such as traffic, etc.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian.
G. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Staff Cars
Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson,
Bastian and Juker.
Nay - Mayor Greavu.
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the urchase of five (5) 1988 Chevrolet Corsairs
at average cost of $8,330 from Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. I Ayes - all.
2. "Maplewood in Motion"
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson moved to accept the bid of Sexton Printing, Inc.. for six
(6) newsletter 28 a es each issue, 10,000 copies at $15,660 and that a bud et
transfer of $4,300 from the General Contingency Fund to cover the extra costs for
6 issues,
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ordinance: Workers Compensation Coverage For Elected Officials (1st Reading)
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report,
b. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance providing workers compensation
covers a for elected officials of the City and municipal officers appointed for a
regular term of office.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
2. Maplewood Fire Fighters' Relief Association
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the amendment to the Maplewood Fire Fighters'
Relief Association, By -Laws raising the Eension from $1,100 to $1,300 12er year of
service.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Bastian.
13 2 -13 -89
Councilmember Juker abstained.
3. Dispute Resolution Center
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
be Councilmember Anderson moved to contribute $250.00 to the Dispute Resolution
Center and that after one ear the services be re--evaluated.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1810 E. County Road B (Fulk)
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal.
C. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until such time as Mr. Fulk can
appear before the Council.
Seconded by
2. Rezoning Initiation: County Road C (Mogren)
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to waive the requirement of tition si ned b 50% of the
surrounding property owners within 200 feet of the ro ert in question*.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
3. Code Amendment: Zoning Initiation (1st Reading)
a.. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Director of Community Development. Olson presented the specifics of the proposal.
c. Commissioner Cardinal presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance to amend the zoning code that
would delete the requirement fora petition of surrounding ro ert owners to apg1
for an amendment to the zoning code.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
4. Home Occupation: 2109 Lydia Avenue (Fritsche)
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal.
14 2 -13 -89
C. Mrs. Carol_ Frit sche, the applicant, who wishes to conduct a skin and hair care
salon in her home at 2109 Lydia, is asking for a variance so she does not have to
provide for the handicapped by constructing a ramp.
d. No action taken.
5. Ariel Street - County Road B to Cope Avenue - Project 88 -11
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
89 -2 -13
WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have determined final costs for the
improvement of Ariel Street - County Road B to Cope Avenue, City Project 855 -11.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be
specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel
of land abutting ors. the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City
office for inspection.
FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the
Council thereof.
Seconded by Councilmember __Anderson. _Ayes_,-- __ Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Juker
Nay - Counc i lmemb e r Bastian
C. Mayor Greavu introduced the following res olut ion and moved its adoption:
IV 89 -2 -14
WHEP A,1_1 Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council,
prepared an assessment roll for the construction of Ariel Street - County Road B to
Cope Avenue, City Project 88 -11, and the said assessment is on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED BY THE. CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of March, 1989, at the City Hall at
7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two
15 2 -13 -89
weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property
affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the
general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed
assessment roll '.s on file with the Clerk and that written or oral objections
will be considered.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Juker.
Nay - Councilmember Bastian.
6. Ferndale Storm Sewer - Project 87 -20: Schedule Assessment Hearing
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Director of Public Safety Ken Haider presented the specifics of the proposal.
C. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
89 -2 -15
WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have determined final costs of the
improvement of Boxwood Avgnue from McKnight Road to Ferndale Storm Sewer, City
Project 87-20.
NOtil, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be
specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel
of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City
office for inspection.
FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the
Council thereof*
Seconded by Councilmember Juker.
Ayes - all.
d. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
89 -2 -16
WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council,
prepared an assessment roll for the construction of Ferndale Storm Sewer, City
Project 87 -20, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA;
1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of March, 1989, at the City Hall at
7:10 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place
16 2 -13 -89
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published in the of f icial newspaper, at least two
weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property
affected by said assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the
general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed
assessment roll is on file with the Clerk and that written or oral objections
will be considered.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker.
Ayes . all.
7. McKnight Road Phase 3 - Conway to Beaver Lake Project 87 -05 - Schedule Public Hearing
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following Les olut ion and moved its adoption:
89 -3 -17
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City. of Maplewood has been authorized and
directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of McKnight Road Phase
3, Conway to Beaver Lake, City Project 87 -05 by construction of street and utility
improvements, and
WHEREAS, the said City Engineer, has prepared the aforesaid report for the
improvement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as
follows:
1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed
improvement on McKnight Road Phase 3, Conway to Beaver Lake, City Project
87 -05 by construction of street and utility improvements is feasible and
should best be made as proposed, is hereby received.
2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the
reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total
cost of the improvement of $3,371,213.11.
30 A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. at
1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 13th day of March, 19 89 , at 7:20 P . M.
to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Juker
17 2 -13 -89
Nay - Councilmember Bastian
8. Southlawn Avenue, Proj ect 85-17, Change Order Two
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
be Mayor Greavu introduced the f of lowin res olut ion and moved its adoption:
89 -2 ®1.8
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 85 -17 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Improvement Project 85 -17 Change Order Two in the amount of $7,039.95
for a total of $449,986.97.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED BY THE, CITE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing
contract by executing said Change Order Two.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
9. T.H. 36 Access. Closures
a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu moved to a2prove the concept of the access between Barclay and
Hazelwood on the north side of T.H. 360
Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
J. VISITOR PRESENTATION
1. Roger Anitzberger
a. Mr. Anitzberger questioned if the access to T.H. 36 by Ariel Street is to be
closed.
b. Staff stated that access is going to be a permanent closure.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATION
1. League of Women voters
Councilmember Anderson wished to thank the League of Women Voters for their support.
2. Menards
a. Councilmember Bastian stated he thought that when Councilmember Anderson
presented his motion to include times of operation, he feels the hour of 7:00 A.M.
is too early.
18 2 -13 -89
b. Staff stated that was not included in the Motion. It is understood Menards hours
to be 9 : 00 . M. to 9 : 00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and 10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on
Saturday and Sundays. There is no ordinance that would change the hours.
C. Council stated this could be discussed when the Conditional Use Permit .comes up
for renewal.
3 . Art
a. Councilmember Bastian requested money be set aside for purchasing art work from
the artists who display their work at City Hall.
b. No action taken.
4. Noise Ordinance
a. No discussion.
5. Cable
a. Councilmember Anderson stated he is receiving a lot of "Flack" because Council
is not putting their meetings on Cable.
b. Staff to research the cost of using Cable.
6. Open Space - Fish Creek
a. Councilmember Anderson questioned what the costs for open space.
b. Councilmember Anderson moved to instruct Staff to investigate legislative costs
for open space.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
7. Taxi Cab Home Occupation Permit
a. Councilmember Juker stated she has received complaints about Mr. Catlin violating
his permit conditions.
b. Staff to investigate.
8. Mr. Donut - Rapid Oil
a. Councilmember Juker requested the access from White Bear Avenue be researched.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None.
M. ADJOURNMENT
9:35 P.M.
City Clerk
19 2 -13 -89
Agenda Number E -1
Action by C ouncil-'sol
AGENDA REPORT
]Endorsed
Mo dif i e d ..... ir��rwrr
TO: City g Man a er Rejected.....,.
Date
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: June 16, 1989
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following
claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE.
$ 671,960.66 Checks #4401 - #4455
Dated 06 -01 -89 thru 06 -14 -89
$ 209,820.49 Checks #1165 - #1340
Dated 06 -22 -89
$ 881,781.15 Total per attached voucher /check register
$ 189,331.84
$ 47,410.22
$ 236,722.06
$1,118,503.21
Payroll Checks
Payroll Deductions
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
D F F : kaz
CITY OF' MAPI.L
FA 1
4
6 1 "1 , = t ;9
14 u 4.. 1
V0EJC
i• =:: Pk1:: ER
FO R - E I 0 .
VOUCHER/
—
• H E-C K -
V f:
! f:. c. f •.
E N-aO Ft
r 1Yf
,+
NUMI- ER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT(
AMOUN
�Jf
.t
a
t_t t 1
• :� U 1 .. �.�
_. ,� L , f X ,.. �,...,__D .1,�; , t �-t 1 c.: f �. tw4 �i �' �1
- .. , 4 t : _ yr y ; - �( ¢ - , �'
��p+:��y�:
,�t ,� .. _�.- ,
t,
v
4 4 0 Z
1 1:�� ')00
06/01/89
ME�"R�ti EMERGENCY N�:.'Y
Tt'AVE.tw ! 't�%t� !�ii.t'�it�
t
1 U. 0 0
E
44
4 1 0 4 1 .50
066
KEL C
0 F1' "IC:E U" E ;_;
1
►
16
�► '
J
- 4
1 f U
t. 6 / 0 1 8 9
jk-M0 -tla_. rj IL C:0 �
-i�'� lj��� -0 � �
� � r
_.- �
s
i
{
4 4 05
4.51 � 0 0
a �:: 01 / � £ 9
•
L A iii E T T 1 � ► �U hJ �
A W A R � �.` I) � �t ;� � i�� t� C: � 1 ��� ���
4 r= 9 U �: ;� �a
9
,,� y ,� . fr �, ��
4 6 ! � a„ x ;„ 5
�
•I
4406
54 4 0 0
016 0 1 �,�
M S TAT E RE
MOTOR � �_
1► E H . 1 C Y
�
"T
4 1-1 4 0
'M1J' � � . ��,,,, ,i 9
.! V
M j- j��.j�j, ..__.,. . .. -(� ., a- - . ,. f ... ..�, ,U y y .. ,t .. .. ...
M 1 { V (V ■ f l i . f i �.J 1w/
...... .. ._. .... « � {, +'gy p . � i .1 j, [� .t�� y (' _
f Jul T L. D 1 .i J L. R w1 i,. l L • ... _. _.
S
i,�f �•ri' '_�f - -
0 - �r ��
f• �;' =. - ..AN ( _ _. _. ..
- .._, -
4 40 8
0
06/01
BLUE C R O SS BL S
HE L FE DENTA
H e M A LtF U �[ T, 1 IN
A. 1♦ INS.
T l 4 3 . 9
-
24i
,I
6R O UR - - HE - A LJH 1 N
93 6 _ 1._ 125.
,
hI
HEALTH L. I F i:: D �� 1\11 A L
f , �-� �'� . �. 4
}'
A / R ICS!' .
3 1 1 0 C ry
".
r� i y 45,
z�+
4 41 0
8 10100
06/01/89
SHA
H C-MA DEDUCTIO
1
30!
HEAL l- I t I DE
•� , 35 3 .46
44 11
15060
06 /t39
COMM LIF INS ("
LIF I INS .
9 � £�
YJ
H E A L TH L1 1 - i.. DE
579
361
A/R INS.
1 7 . 61
'
44 1Z
5 014 0 0
0f�/01 9
MALI
1 {'
IjI
.� t . t3 �. •� �J
u r ,: / �.� `
f' #. 1 N
A W A f t �'�: -. D C Cy T i Ll C �` I f :Z �
'
-- =1`' . �
- - A «�� -� �'7� . . '� "�
,. ,
4 414
� � r »� � � .� //
1 . _ "•! _ 0
] - ;:• f s_ t x;
�v �� � 0 L.r f 6 s'
� f� :r i�'•r^. NATURAL ' "e {(. ! • - • � +) • r s i 1
4� � _ P T N O 1 • R i_. S � � U t1 fa {.., • •.1
, i }t � L � - { ; f r i�,t
1) 1't, • L i 1 • E r� t..l E
` t
1 1 3 11 . '.T 0
511.00
j a
+ i
4 4 1 +5
5 41.4 - 0 0
0 6 w« d ,9
M STATE TREASURE!--Z
MOTOR Ut:.H L i E•
t 5 � 5 ( f
1 50
1 57 4
1 �.J - 5 - 41 - 4 � t
f J
t�3 �, f __ . }__ ___ _
...< ............. ._. -. ._tyti_ ( A r R -,.7' . R .« 1 C ......... . _._.. _.
sgr.m�t
T77
I
4417
541400
. f`
I I'd . TA !. T K k t 1.1 R E R
ire � T �.i V t:. i f ►. I C I` t:. �:. ,:,
' ,} �;� :.� 1:.. ,.. •.
q . ,�,,:_ b
I
L .I
4
5 - 1 1 4 0 0
t � i �
06 ,! t .•:
MINN. � s t + s R
,..� � A T E � r1 � � %.F �.? �� E i'{
»� f J� ( { • � / + ` F t •. r ... r .
wt ! A 1 !,.' }.i t'f � Y i.. � 5..• 1 #.... t«. �
../ � (~
'.. T..J� ` x s_I 0
869
It
16
,
,{
6!
_
f
T R A 'V E L. T R A I r
I t..
I` i •i ►J 6 t i A !il S i_1 P t-' 1 E a
SUPPLIES JAN11_ -*k
.7c
w..
UP -14• JA
5w74
t
t 4
OUCHRE
C ITY OF M v
PAGE 2
! 1 /
1 w },
VC:�UC `iER/ + 1ECJ — .', RV.GISTER
8
VOUCHER/
4
N
NUM
DATE
N A M E
D E SCRIP T ION
A MOUNT
AMO
t�
: .E_,.
TRAVEL TRAIN
3
4 5« f 4
4 4 2 t�.........-
43 8 � � ... :....
-0 �• .�: � .�: � 8 1: .
K_�� ~f t ► j #.. - . , . f 1 C• f° f %�(r f`i D .
Y
D t . f= "t.? i! � � :7 F' f S S A .f:.' L E
� ' � ! t „1 �4 q 0
,
� 7 � � �, M . 0 . -
3(
4421
630
06/06
NATI F IRE PROT
A 8 0KS
111.20
141
,a3
�, ,
442
�.
5414 0
�.
0 06 ;�
M INN. S TA` E TR
STATE: D R I �' L I C r �': E S
.:�
��{ y, �; w
�. �� � �U
♦
t� 65 r 00
TAT E-' _ .#' � �C � �� t� �” �- v.. , ...
� _ �:.,..._ ... _ M f_t "C 0 R V E H L I C
�
'
4 4 24
0 440
06. / 07 /89
BR OWN AND C I S , I N a
CO NS TR U CTION C:O
173,530
1 73 5 3 z
!1
44Z!5
816"i 06
- . 07
�++tAf�LE f ..�flT �P � 3.i» �f lt�� �r.J+?�
r OFF F 7 C L t'►t.. i�
"F 1 7'5 0 a �.J0
OFFI CIALS
00
r
5 b�
1
s
4 :
541400
06107/89
MI NN. STATE TREASURER
M��r�OR VEH LIC.
11,01:5
1 +��,5. �"�
?al
311
�• µ
'���
ff ••�..�•_ y .gam
LI!"L � wi ��: a
�......... _.,.
�V +G ' ..A tl .,,r..... -. _
: ;�: M . ".:
`
• i
3
4
4 {�
140
�J ! t
W k. i, f�c .,: - + r � c T C 0 U f� 1
r i�
—
L �1 1 T {l V +�. wi �« 1 \.r r
r
1 301.
3 5
u:.
♦u.auia
� .._.. ... ,._...r_, r. _. _ ..... .. _ _ _.. ... .. a .n ... ..
. w - _- ,.nwiwu.
.✓ • r r. r ra .,t.r_ ««..
+.w.+
...... ... a._1 ....- ._ u..I. a-........... v. ic:-_:..:'
r__..'...,., v. . aJ._. a: u.. a.. n41+,_...r,:...J.ulu.L.r:v+w_.
sr sn .wi: ::.fl:.u.n.r: n::.
:... w' ..
-
11
4429
070 300
06/08/89
BEHIM LOI S
PROGRAM Sl.IPPI.IE.S
5,52
38
.: • •« r,• n+•„'•,. a+_.++«-
r +.r ...:.r-- 5..:.:.+Naw,_r n .1......,.. ».+..'r_ir^.!_..
ih,.+ rM• !+1w.a,.y.w«�.aN♦aw,•...rn..n ..._ _✓a- ._,_.. • •� .!}.+n _
a+ww.r"y.,.. , .,+. .. .- r..w!YY,_ - ..f`K!wr«IYaw:, .rr.wW.. +.
.w✓wr.w.,+ir..�n+nw.. s._.v.._: a- _rv ..,_.. ' +etu .. - . ,..." • .. .:...
,•\
..... .. ......
VV
3,
1 40
41
4451
54i 4c
/ �/
- ':
NN N ST ATE; T �{EASfJ�ifw.R
f�RC +TI�F� V�.f•� 1. IC•.
� 75'� M 7'9
42
' 1
43
144
1
44:2
722204
06/09/89
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
PERA DEDUCTION
9 , f 11 .90
146
�
. _.......... -_ ._....._. •..« •..r«.. .w_w.aw.
,. .. .r.:n...• .rr.•• ,+,wwv+
:.
+H+.rYCM+.':+wn.+e!V ^F. •... •- `•T':•.•:sT!,!M.,
PE C
v
1 � , 016 a 90
_ .• - ._ ; w
i
44.x`'
S�� ��S�3
� /�'9/ �'�
METRE WASTE C•ONT410L C0MM.1
SN ..1E WAGE T RP— AT MIENT
1 1 * 92 1 , 4•r'�„ 14
112 � 4tiJ. ' 1. 4
�sa
51
-_..., "F L ,.........
- V N - 1 1 E.: D • 'lr'i 8 1 1V r S f!" L• f` C. ;?
REPA-1-k-MAI-N-T
...... -4 1-33' 'Ifify-1-
3y ,
i
1 .531
.
REPAIR MAINT
`ir
48a00
i
'
REPAIR M A I N
1.41 .0 0
REPAIR MAINT
2 .0
REPAIR MAINT
48.00
_..
'.. w ...a _.,: ..,,.::...._
-. . .. _ . ._... _.... ,w_. .w. u, ,. _.. v... , . . ....... ..... .. .
�( _ J.L ." ]��{[ '�U( _
...... ._.._. - ...... . .. - ......_ ... .. w.... _...._.....
-.... ._ _. .._ti
«.r.. ..._ ._... . -..
REPAIR MAINT
48.00
F * I R MAI
14
REPAIR M
9
1,1 60 . 00
�F
7
4 4 _�'"`
6 1, f� Cl
���, / +r�':a �' '�`
� �; �� � � �� A #� .v i�`� �. L L `� t p A .
�._ A 1�f I� R !� � C. E'f A E
,. ,.� a . t� t�
�, 9 ,--- � � L
�, � , � , r
'6$
ro
71
44 3 6
1 90100
06
DE OF NA , U EtAL RE.:,
DN t._I C•E:.NS E:
38
8 85 •0 l}
•x
447
541 400
06 /69/59
rREAURE
MINN STA .:J
MOT VEH L IC•.
„ � x -,99 r 5
i 1 599.25
►`
'Fi
"i{
1
r�� 1 �.,
CHREG
VO CITE OF ,Y 11 F'� LWCjoC)
PAGE 3
1,
►�C. ..._
�-� � 1 / t' t-I E 1�:
C' •
, PE
VOUCHE R J
- •-
N U M BER
NU DATE NAME
DES C: !�t I P 7 I ��+ t _ 1 `• 5
AMOUNT
AMOUNT b
> t m - 1 NN. ..r TA E R A8U R: . ti ft
d _.._..
39 1090Cj 6 / 12/89 M A 'L EWO S TATE BA Ni :: FICA PA-YAD-LE,
�u
F C ON i R 1 B UT IO 7 1 138.87 f
�' 35, 548.73 1 4
A 1f
DEFERRED CCJLM,PL PAY
4442 541400 0 1 �f 8 9 MINN. sal TATE TREASU M O T O R V E H L IC: Fl E.
rr ll jjj -
PAUL.. C I T E OF
..... _
U t 1 i. I T I E S
-- :f T•
t _
,
4445 021675 06/13/89 AMICUS SYSTEMS, 4
1. 4 t
1...a ,
E'
. I
N G -�
t U � ~ , ...._ `� �� �) '�� �' 139.43 in k
4 $ f 3 / E;
tj
F L E E S S f isR
SERVICE j
444 8 7� - � � » � I V ■ �M �t i �/i +_► V ��....W.. .- +n••IyR. ..- _. _.,.,.,. .....w•_ : i"::k S y` t j '
S 414 0 0 06 /13/ 89 f I NN . S TATE TREA MO..f. R V E �-�- 3 7
10 617 94
J
1 0 3ql
,
444 � 31 O .,�G' � -
,
i O V F{ tit f E. T a<<
TRAINING N I � �' � '4
1FttI
{ 6
4 y
E *"_ -fiA 1"ib -T E: lti-
f ) �1 rw.. v'+- .r .+r__r_.a .... .Y+vr__+•.v.v ., •___• „.'✓ -.+._ i • ^.�y ._..:� ..1. • _.., n.v_ +.....•r ti �
? +-+ t
4 4!5p 1 0`80600 t36/1.a/8,.. OCTOPUS CAR �A�M _
- A ACCTS 4,
445 (00750 ��°14!'", ..... �. _.. ��.
r:
PA '.3E QRA 1 4 F.
FE E S F CiR NEf V 1 C
3 `55 , .79
X79 .79
_._., 1 ....... _
_ A N ' ' 7 '
.. ... ..... ...
_ .._ .
•
Uf - lit + A
N
___... _
1�. < `.�.l f.. A tai
_._.
I L 16 9 ,••� R A R � A � r
uTIL „ 1'15: ARC'A -
.
146
�..,TIL 1 4 !_} M lul
+�:
4454 541400 0 6 1 4 13, 9 Oil N STA i"R Iri0 Vf' F-1 #.. , - +:. E " �
j
r
OUCHREG c 1 T Y oF' M APLENOOD ' P AGE 4
r / 1 1.; "-� 14 r ,, ��U HFR /�: I iISTER �!
f JR Rlt t fir.
.. W c 14 t .
..,
NUMBE NU MB ER D AT E NAME DEOC IN T ION A A MOUNT �1
,
mil' � r' at 'T'��T�'; `' , ��� � � iM� • � �� i
1 16 1 - 5 010260 66I22/89 A. E.C. EN�II�EER� OUTSIDE ENG 185 00 1 815 o; o'
t
1166 010350 06 /2 2 /8 9 A.R. I . MECHANICAL SER VICE S RE P A IR M AI N T / :3 . 1 3985 - 7. 1 8 '
k
,�U Fa'L.1 S JANITOR
i ` { L
S .iJ ' 1 } �-S JANITOR -
�,�a
SU V E H IC�2 11.
SMALL TOOLS 48.1
i
P ROGRA M S �.�1
50 24
TE�t1AL .
M A I N T
1 1'1' 1 ��
•
! .'... :..:Y_.:._r.v...: -:M t>,.- ....:..::.: ._,•. ,....:_+...+ Y'-, i.. +4,r. «r...f.0 +.r12:y n___.: _.- a:_... .: V_Y..... n:.. ...:.r_....._.. ........:..... .....__. ._:n .,. _. _.. �'
rat -
23 90
;�. F�F'Lx �� JAN IT�iR 9.
f 1
w
11 Fp
t
MAIN M A TE R IA L 1 ,47 �� »1�. i
gf
z
roU PP L I E S OFFICE 594140 168 As 58 s
1s
3r)I � _
^ w
.. .... - ,.� i tai
._ _t ..... a,...
yy
}yam IY " "^
,
. t
1170 0 .; : 1 o.6. / . / A1. BE
KATHLEEN � RIOGRAM R .G FEES . 00 15 y 0 0 2 ;
f
1171 021.425 06 24"/89 AMERICAN PLANNING AS'S0CIATI(3N MEMBER HIF' 42.00 42. �� � � , .
1.. .. _. _._.. .. _ :
k t ,
s 1~ .��
117.3, 040+1.5 06122 ARNALS AUTO ,� ERVIC'E RE MAIN VEHICLE 1.����1
MAJ NT VE a
nt
drkj
i
1174 041500 06/22 AR TSIGN SUPPLIES EQU IPMENT 32.93 32.93
r �
1 0 0 6 / 22 8 A,,S30CIAT10N OF MET 0 TRAV TR AIN 2 00 4
FAVF'1,. '(RAIN 2 0. 0 0
j ., _ . _ __ _.__.__ W. W_....__• _ ._.._.. _ .�_...a __...w._ _.__._..___.. ..
4 . 7 1 1176 06 0 EAN =x KELLY P .A. F F1. SE RV'I _E 15 .20
i
LEGAL .& F I rC:AL _ . _
_.:. _ .
acs t.�cy
49 k !
L E GAL &w F='ISCAIr 40. ss
LEGAL. & FISCAL 20 .00 fis
j� LE a: F I C AL : i} .0�:� ;�
L. E: C:i A L a: FISCAL 470 00
L E t A �.. t� I ,_ I.• A L fir .. t 31
� Y tn1
1•E: LEGAL. �?: F=I 180. 17'p
165Y20 k �
1t�f
It! `=' T . t^ .. 1 of
UTIL 1685 ERVAI s.
1Z.1 2
_
.. _
tfw � •
A� ,eJl
1183 . . : :. ...... 1w!:. iti~ 7�.I` ♦ j}`•✓�. i -:1 A 3w' . ��+•• 'V Mr U +�. .. FEES g R SERVICE
gy � (/ .. � ,.,:.. .., -. ' � : : - .
f .. ... .. .. .. ,.. yy1a*' - ..f!� .. M ,. M . - t Yn► t•n'.Sr, ii V ! t) 7 -: ✓ : , E,
{ ZV? } ( �♦.
t .:.. ... r
,. �2y�
1 184 V 9 1 4'50 06 /ZZ /8 Yid uWN I NG F ERf1 I S I iVD • FEES F U SERVICE V I C� � � .. .. 'T ( f... - .w 3 1' .., 'F 7w:. w 37.
1 4i
,•fit• 14 • 4
13 21 4;
AA
j ' U REA U C 11 _Aut''' », L Tt"t
118 -6 6122/89 FEs
A T N I N 1JM
•.+»wnWrr+M•.!yx••wS.#Y�H AMTr1.+4is r- u,4,�i,- w -, +e _..r_.,..._r�ww.s.�,w.w .::_,_ -.. .�.._,w.,.�. _ nv
. n._nr, .,.- ry -.�_, .. --:,. ,•_ �. we_ rx. wii, ry-. ws++^.., r. ..,v- +w- w..,_..w__,.,.s- •+,..r. .wn...
•.---1,. r...,_ u�+_... r...,,,. a..-:._-..-.« n......,. �.......,,._.. n. n.•.+. M•.,. w::.-. r, r. e•.. n. r• i+„+._ r:., �, u....+• Ib. 4+ M, w'.. wa.. ...:,.nrle,.'f- ...Ha.w.4 -:t .n,!,wµ• „' ,
f _:gin. i h•.a,. .. .. :12 ....i :.'::. '1y.•NM.M
a.♦•Hy4lMM�wlr'irr•'.r..
,
34 f t 1 -, PR - �, w a;
3 11 101 0 6 / �Z/ 8 9 BUR J ER R Y PR ,��.(3t� � 4 1
$ ! 4'
b �,.♦� w .. j'�
1 ' t .. t 70; / i •r l � EMI - 'y • ' ...
i;
1 1 1 31 0 � /ZZ / 8. Y C A MP BE LL, . LYLA P R I G IS fRA � Oft
1190 11039 06 C A PI TOL RUBBER STAMP COMPANY SUPPLIES O F FICE
,.
f ,
5f
_ /.
[ L S U.P P. - t_,..I ES J .A IN 1 T u R ...... ............. ....... .,.........::.... _................._.� .t{ � ... {[ t _. _,.. _ _
1 1 9:.,. 1 3 0 560 0 6 -1 ♦ CHEMaE'ARCN CH E MICALS I 3 - 6
1 , 11 'x:3 13 6 C HI r� PE" W A B RIN G S WATE � C OO L ER i 6..a5 . ♦ 5 �6�
fi ,
.6'
RUG L !:. �t lit € t t -
RUG CLEANING is be
rr+_ m
,. .,. r. _., ..r _._ . r• ter., - Rff"A - _ 1...... .. ., .. ... _.... - .. -
( � �..• {-, J [ '(' KENN !, �'• �I (- yr( S U P P L IES •t y - fU
J4 1 1 9 6 1 6 4 . 2 0 0 0 6��..�./ 8 ' ,�` COL KL1V�ME!H 4, PRO SUP PLIES �Fe.tp67� 48. 67 1y
i
'
1197 1 151 ' 0 6 8 j COMP yp' 4 7 P ^!p (per 8 00100
s /° - �� T �:e !' � �> �� r� � / �y !.f� �� � ♦` ��' �a. �� 1 �� i � • � � i'' - . .. ` S� W M yF sN1 .. i 4
,
- =tom _' J �:_ L__ : 1 :_ == - = -�= -- - -� �_:_ � _ _ :' Y '::- - - -- . __.._ -.._� _
_._.. _ �.__ -- �--- -'- � , . ,� •^f �, +�• �r
i
i
-YOUCHREG C
CITY O
OF MAPLEla:Oc. D �
� Fa
tf
I
Rl Q 1
l ^• Ti [.. i V T l i 7 l• f'� Y G.1 `i L1 1 1
1 T.. V 1 L.. c
c ; rE r K'.
NUMBER N
NUMI:�EFt I
IAA TE �
�ti���tE �
�.�1��;�.:t� II~'T' Ii:�� A
AMOUht T A
A('�i� "Ut�1T
E
g A V E
E l L ' T R tl
P7 't
�'� .� tab / �° ! BASTIN
en
t
11 117 0
0 61 9 00 0
06 /2 2 /8 9 B
BA'rTE TI WA REH O U SE ►
► Ll1-" L VEHICLE:
15.36 j
j
J S
SUPPLIES VEHICLE:
27.75 4
43.11 1
11
1 t8 -
-
.0 6 1 / B
B (�, TO R SE TH (
(,� { � j j (� t � � �
� � (•yy � E
E : (� tit
l It
' � SJ �
yes c' — a.,.,.,».,..: ..
jai
S UPPLIES E
1
!t
S UPPLIES EQUI 1
14 1
1 w 7 4 1
2
i
.1 0
080900 0
06 / Lt., / ESA A
A : W " +�[ �(►^` �'��'`` C COMM yyy t j' ;�i j?�•� {[• `i .t �
� ([ .w. � •�j. [[ ��! } y�] �
�/�s :
- -
-
_I.
U T ;I : L. 1 902 C T if r� I? 1.
n !y .
..« n•: e-• ......- ..^...v-- .w.:+- +...+.... a- r- ... ---- ,- ,.,....- .....- ,..w..., :. ._ ....._,_../y....ttt....- ...4..• �y. �7.•t ._. -. _y. . 5' 1..:....._.: .:... n...• r«..:,:.,-^..,.. r.: w......«••.,.,.... .,.,:;.,•.••..,;-_. �,..,.,«.-...::. s
s. x +_�,..n..,+..••..:+,.w.:. -c:. -. .,,�.x•> « .
...
'( 1- 6
..; >.� .... «- r , -..... .�,.. x .... ...>r^ ,i ..a.i :. vFS'M >, aron .. ....
1
:. 0�1 UCE -1
CI O F MAPL.EWOOD
PAGE 6
l'Il
1 f't / 15/89
�! : • `
U r.1 U �:: I -J E R i �: H E:. C: f_; R E . G I '� T E �i
�^ w
9
(Si
7
2�
1 � VOUC
}4i
( p� ^ 1 �C!�
-CH
t ( } K jf r (/��(
t�f�{r (
-C
.,, .
V jj�. . ] i ce ` . t r� y t...._, ..........,..:
'
T f
..
I T " iYi:
_ _ .�
_ .._ .. _
i ,; NUMBER
NUMBER
DA E"E
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
�
aI
i
i ..... .... ....._.:...: .:.... -- _ �!' ..._.....
- rr
--l-51- . . » _,,._..-
•
._...M. .. •�.- '..� .........-
V ! 1�. /:•.
••'� , }' ..,- .._...r .r.. _ .. ..�.a.�e......,. ...+... __......-._ r,. w......._»-,., wr....-.......,..
W S:.` 1 `! t 7 ` • i 1
w»............. r_ •,....,.....- ..+- _....__._.. -.- •• ..f... {� - _ r } 1 .., � r � .1.. ' . �" f • � y� `�' t j
- t ti i. M( 1 - '1 1' 1 \, d }.,.+ 1 i_L 1`i I ... .. i T�. -. ,,...... -. _._.. ,. ,...
_ .. ....... �. ._ .... :.._ .. ..... ..
_.....__ ... .... .:... . - ....� _. '•ti" 1 lei _ ......- .. -,.-.(
,{
1 199
151 Soo
06/22/89
CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER
SUl "PLIES E'i.;,tU IPKENT
198.0
' 1
J. /:. �.� ��
152300
'+ / 3 ..'e ! �'
V
COPY D U PL l.r i 1 I t M '..1 P R �. i D r
D U f� t. I C A � 11 M G C O ti F I J
�+ �� ') X 8 5
{ r
D U P L I C A T I N G C:O" [- S
.M 0 2n;: r 2'T
908.12
1'ZOI
152400
06/22/89
COPY EQ UIPMENT, INC*
SUPPLIES EQU�.F`rE6r•f`�T
140.28)
f
U r E= L. E. S EQ (.1 I E P E:. T
50.73
191.01
_
I; 1 2
170090
_
06/2
CURLEY, ELAINE S.
PROGRAM REG I s ION
Iz ()o
12.00
,
�� 1 t:: �1�
'# �"� .
" ;�'-�?��: �► ��#I"'{-T"� �rt� n-- �t� E��E� �."I�� �' ����' I � I.
,_�,�__ _... � +.1 �.. » �`•`�'._...�.:.w _:..,.._ _.._
;;,.;
SUPPLIES OFFICE
5 .44
O FFICE 1-UPPLIES
,1�
•
E M
r i
l
�. F «
4!c f.• • •.,t' 1
t'I el
�t !
I f .
(
SUPPLIES OFFICE
r , E
f:�Uf�f - f 1 L' �� r L�
' 4, 4 r 0
� r
e. f - tr f
!
301
31
f
•1
d,
4
-r n- ...f•rMMw°n -..
. -t.
.:: •:
.... _, ,.. ....: .... �
......:... _ ::. ... -
..�
.. ..
.... Srw ^..*.F. »'a' -r: r• _ -
C [� j!''�� ++�� 'ji'. [jam {}`••
� � � � 6.: V - �� � •L 1M' M:
r ..
_. ±,jl�..a,rrY•.
-' .���:..��I: ice. :,........-
t
32
1' :,. : -�
:':'.: �...• :. ....
: ,..:; '... -' ...
-. ,.
�.
F F L I .. ,., �. E= �• E
-
a t
4..,
� t om•
1!14..4
3
35
ih �f
}` _,.:.:. .:e :._.. ..:.:.
I7R{ � 4!
... .... '.. .><,.,., t,..�.._ , r. .. j ..: .. . -:, ,,,..
� 4! �x l 4 a �+
�. .. _. ... .;:,..._:. .. _ :: .�.. .+... ,.. ,. .. _.._.. _... ... ... .._... ._. .__
A �. _ T r�: A i
<_'"'___..., .� _. ti .. �'• �'L. �y �• r �f '{' .j'' �••
� . G...1 F 0 f 1 � J [. P Y I L.• E
,.- .._...,.,._...
� 72 ...`: -( 0
l� 4.�
.._.. ,...a .s...,. .JM. » - y am• ............ ..... ..b..a.._....,.....
-� f a;.. r
36
37
38
1205
181750
u(S /4 /L.• J
DAVIDSON, M
P RE'G I;_,TRATI
-3 6.00
36.
39
IQ
12b6
0 " "
+ / I r i• /80
DI
E:QLII E MC-. {OJT OTH1.4%
L -., .00
, c J �1
fi��.
43
7. ._..,. ..._
1- ��r..�._......
��t���".�..
r .
t t..
�7�t�L 1 R.f ..,.._.<1�
.rte :.. ,t•••.�y. :�1: < _ _ _ ._ ,.
f .'..j�,. t . 1,,,i t r
T��.rfl
_ _, ,_. _.: ... �. { _ 'j' -.. '• .,; OFF . f... :. _ _.. _. .._ .. _ _ ._
r� { 4 I i... 3. ; irl O Vi (� 1 ``• E''�•
_ . _ .. ,�t._.r•• ._ :._ _
f',
[ • i
dd�
S U P PLIES OFFICE TC:E.
4 7• . 63
X
4
,
�• ,ma w
�y l� �,.g. ••�,�,�� x _
w w « � . f1J1I�"l►1
.}. �
.
. y. �f
5 0 0
�tetJ
Iqt�
` 1Z09
2 30700
06fZZf8'9
EAST S IDE. GtT.*C:
SURPE.IEF: VE:FfIC•t_.E'
f:.5x �. , •�
4 {�
U P `. L ES lE H 3. C !ter
1 s +.� �
�
��53
' I
T C L E r_ + ' L ', H
C
0
t�f
1
�
15'
t • .i i4`: -
'��������.,... -,� 3A l !.� �i:7 �tf
� T � L.1I`��r. • ��1:. •
�:4 p i ti?�..........,,.....
77
� -� it '�....- _...,.
5 7
E �;t 1211
240;2Z5
6 22 e.
tL IA , JAMES
UNIF CLOTH
;�0 . 00
20.00
1212
; -60400
06/22:/89
FAUST, DANIEL
VEHICL ALLOWANCE
5.10
' TRAVEL. TRAIN
4
455,73
12
26.0700
06/ZZ/89
EIRE NGINE:ER'I
ME'M8(lR SHIPC
1113 r95
1 .9r
••i
... _. .... ,,. ... .:. ........:.. .. ..•_
{.. .. ....
1. �.�. 1
...... 7-10 ...1.. 4,. ` / .:......,
...
�` 'j[ {y
r �'• wy
.. .... L •. .y.,. .:{y .. ....._
.
. . 1 .. .. L � ! j� A t 1.. .1 • T {: •..� t \ .1 }.� � f \ - A - - 1 � 1 '1 1 � S. � ��i � � �.-. .., t � .F. �� � f 4• ... .. - .. -
FL E ^7y� ��+•'• w' -y�• y j • ��� r f. }�� S/y' ij+' 7 } (}+(� ryT T � � {j . ,....... j}'��' 1�'••. �1 • . {}.{,f{ •� {• i �7 y�•Y�',
AH
i ..bJ -My... .... .... ...:.....
- �7 • r a fir �)
.. .... .... ...- _ .. .::_. :..i ..,.., r.r .t......: -. » ... '_..._,-
/ 1 � r Irt .Mi
__..._
1
2 7 0 150
06
FLAIL- M A S TE R COR PORATION
r.:1 U PN LI L,S V
I 37.5
4
I�
,........._...__...._. - ._._......._ _..._._._....
.,....._....._......_____......
.._._.......: ..._. _r. ..,,-- ._._._.,.._
_�. .... .,_...... ........,.._.._._._ .- _..,,.._ ......... ... ._...._.._.._._ _._.. -. ,....__,_
., ._._.....- »._._..: _.,_ � t r•., .. T ..j .rte. __ _ _ .__ .. ._ _.... _........... .. _.....
.. {.. {.,
I
Sri
12
. �
r 3
2 7 0 . 0
_ �_.�
/ !� 1
0 ..?J2'2 "� 9
� �... SERVICE . �
�.-. y� TECH CORP,
, LEEi TECH
.,..� T 1 ��•
E (� j j� jL j '{ Y
�) � "f1).i1 +.. �f1�1i k
.r, •.•,•
i }�
►.r� r
_ 2 71 �^
.7•.1
�i 1
t
.YUUC:HREG
9 V
__.,_.. - 9
CITY OF MAF'1.EIVOOD
PA
1 U
1
�
• \r.
• F 5«• LJ
�• t • l 1r. R / C � •� 1_,: �• -K i 1w G i S T E R
1
1 6
/ r
UNIf--t4RMS x CLOTH 3
34 ••3.9
' U
1 S2�
bTttpfj cm
18.5 4
11
3
VOUCHER
�..ri � .� � �.� �•+; � � � G �.,. i � � � � •,. ,. _. �
'r_
.•.... ..
nr...n_....., s_r._•,. ••. — 1 ,
_ ti .w
•... r_._..... .rwwv.._w_. -_. .... w....._+,• ...,w•+r
r
Tf M
NUMBE
NUMBE
1) C E
N AME
D ESC - I' R 1 P f I ON
AM T
AM U NT
�
b j 51
f
It:�a
1`2 .
i
fj
.
R - M E - Y - _....1- ,.._... _
R I
7
0' 0 0 ...
8
1z1s
280475
t)6 /ZZ /89
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS
MAINT MATERIAL
163.55
.55
it
?it)f
�3u
z� U
U N I= U H ir! (":L
5
1219
290450
06/22/89
FRIUCH JERRY
PROGRAM RECf FEES
5+,00
' 1 4
!iJ
1
Z8, UN I �w• �..� h M S �:rc C � L ��� r H 45.42
#3E
tr �
* <.i U N I FOR lii CLO
4 5, 4 2 13;
_ ., s.. - ,� .... CLOT
.. �.
... ........
U • } } � {(•._.• � { y�� ��,11 ti { � : �,/t,. a ,{�{�
N. -I. t , �„� 1 � M S t .�i C t- O T �` ' ` 5 : ` Z 68 �ri�
:
i i4:
1 4
ri
. o.. ✓•,.- ,.4.i:.s.. ,._ .... rw.,.,. www,.. n- i.?r_t.N+•NF+1+•i•�w:..rN
. r w
.• -.. - - �i-... -'. d t MA {w, 1 tl. '-+w i t -... .7CJ �� 4� .,..ilk �''-�.._ w,.�.. •
.�._..__...:_._,..s .� ;.yO..J�. _-..w « h./ V 'wr�t 1J 17 M � l' F.. iw ♦ �� � M � M if 11 � -�� .w 1.J MI ` 4� f.r. 1 � 7 ���
i � � .•S L�J
�44
IZ2 3 0 w / 89 G • 1- • O • A •
S t�: MEMB
1 •
_
:
73 3 02100 06 / / 89 G E NU I PA SUP EQUI N T I 15 f "��
, UFFLIES EQUIPMENT 1 5p 1 ?.5
i
' ,_....., ,.b.:._._... •:- ,.;..r.. -. . .:. .. ...........:�..�........:« - .- .,,._:....,:...,._.. �.7 V 1' �*� � � .:J F:.. � U � i i'14. !ri 1 i ��a 4
r f ._ � ' ..t .r �� � - t
• 1" 2b69 0��22/89 GI LLEN FATR1CIA PF�..�ftA I - � A I 15
air
1� V
I ZZ5 3O 0 06/ G L A DS T ON E L M ART d M MATERI 78.60
lea
1
i
_i L i .. __ _...- . ._.....,.- .,., .: _ «. ., , «, ...�_, ., ..«.,, -....- J ....�..+1: -. -..., , n w.�ws,..•,:.+«s:w.,,.- wrrw:«..- . _ .. .._ r..«_ _ _ �l)
W j o ` - ..._I # fi a:
i 4til ,4
4 11
:t f J f' 6 • •,.
i . 12 :7 310300 0�t /� t��+ GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY R MAI 0
_..._ ........_n_ ,�.._._ .....,,. - . _.. _.... _ _... .. _. V E _ .. , .._ _,
- F E F'A I R M A 1 N fi t-i .t c..
M
...... :
R MAINT V 1
41 01
F:
R EPAIR 13V T V t.. 00
l
�#
,,��y.• y ,(yr�(. Ay �., ��prft �� _ ys•R. g y p ' , y { 5 {.�{ Lt
A •Y �,.,y,..,..- ....,....«_ -__� -•
;i4i f J;
b3 �.
r P r d
�' r !' �+
1 5 41
i 1228 310 71 06/2Z/8� GO TATt: _.GNP: CALL., INC. FEE FOR ��t:.RVIC:E � bo. 90 ..j
I
_ ... ..._ ... ,._ _._
f :
I c :1 z9 3 06 / Z Z/S ll ` G. VERN N TRAI '$ E V TR A V EL TR
j� � ( y '•� 7 {� � t � (r p r :
3J
TRAVEL 1RA1NINt� �+.�•L�� �/)
9 V
__.,_.. - 9
34'
1 U
U 1V I F ►»:+ k f�! ;� S.. CLOTH 3
l
1
1 6
UNIf--t4RMS x CLOTH 3
34 ••3.9
' U
bTttpfj cm
18.5 4
11
�..ri � .� � �.� �•+; � � � G �.,. i � � � � •,. ,. _. �
�. t � �.7 '� - 2
2 5
U CL 0 1H
tH
f 2
21 { I
It:�a
1`2 .
., C: �. U T H s
sa
1
� .
.>t 1
1.3 N �. � �.� t � tai :� C �� u T �! ... �
�3u
z� U
U N I= U H ir! (":L
5
53.86
#
#aq
!! y
5, .86
27 _
_
...... �.:. r. �......,..___.._.._:., �
�, �._.. �...n__..._.. �,.;::_..«_.. �:... �...:._� Cfi l'+ii � �'E r.� � H
_ __. _: _. ..- — -- -- - --` -- — - "- -"L— . v.*mm.••N • m .^«+^
{
-dOUC.HREG CITY OF' MA�tiLr.WC10D PAGE 8 ':1
kv
5 9 14 42' 9 VOLICHER/CHECI REGISTER
,...:
12, h
C-HE M.. ..:.._ _.._. : V E • - D0ft `- ; _ _.: _ .._ 1 ..._
T F: M .T l�f "t .H E,� ; .
5
_ NUMBER NUME, DATE NAME Dr~ �C.R IPT ION AM OUNT AMOUNT 6
r
� T T 190,0 4 2 4 .00
1 _� t s t � r, A j i ., - _ ._ -..
.._ _ _ : _ � � � �' r:. �� t' -- E 1�t:3 N� t•� ._ � �-• , t.� � � r f; d �. �� F � 71
1 f1, g � 1 .
FEES FOR SF.-RV1C[':' 96t.50 4
M AI N T MATERIAL oc� 228.
: � C► , . F? , � � .: f � M - A M� A 1 A #,, P R 0 G R A M U F' P L I ►' _ _ 91- 5
AG
►, i VEHICLE: ALL0WANi:::E �� � � - 40 , ���
,
s7 +3 iC. 4J " + ' :�. . ' ;; . A d i... g R:J fi [ P R � � O R A M R E L�I F E C: �:J +� � m �� � "'1 �.+ .0 ��
7i
f' �''t ' E : t If I i ' T __.: .. M AJ N :�,, .. A _ , :. • -• ; ., _ _ , .._. w... _ _.. -._ _w • __.. w ..., .... _._4 .__...____ ......,.._.,... _ ,
SUPPLI JANITOR 1 9 ; s .
REPAIR +.'Y MA 1NT /F_ 23 r 00
,." ,. a
a. , r,.n .,.,.... t
7 z ..t l f M �� � • .i
, 1
, � y ..s
lz� /39 H. NDY HITCH �c WELDING C13. INC PuGRAM sU�''�'ur-i —
� Tr4 �':�.4�� I
1236 340050 06 /2 /89 HEALTH RESUURSES FEES FOR SERV
�� . C�G�
FEES FOR S ERVICE
ta ...: ,..... ..._ ...
' ! ( � �(� E ` {� / �,� .r ,f ,, Ht }-. L [�� - t � � f R T E �� 3 t }�' ��y [�{ ! �� - �� .
� •? 11 .f. T �+J� wl _ `if - ' '«7� . 6.�. G:. I X 4.. 1'� V 1 , � - S .. i/ - if:.i ` �..S i -•. � 1 - „ , ..t � w 0 0 V • • M V 43
.�.,! -
. .
_ 44
.
� 123 341746 06/22/89 HERTZ NANCY PROG r __ � 451
3 5! 3e
,
w
'3R 50 x
1 1 "1' ! i`.� ,/ �:. .' ;�►. -. H Ra i F M A #"�i' t O R N N R O I F U' l.. ti I[ a t.� w U X 51
' C l I L' /
1 f'UEL i3- 01L. j r6�j {54�
FUEL OIL 20.04
571 .
i O IL q -} ;
,
i.
'471 FUEL 0 1 t-_ 1
` FUEL OIL 16 '�
i ., .. L - r 7 _.., -.. .
1 { . FUEL rr L 5 r .• t���• jv{
a. w i
. 1
FUEL OIL 16.49 � , 5 �.
... ... . , -,. _ -__ 3.__..
_. ... . .� _��, ,. (_.'_'_ .. _ _- L__�% '_�.�:_tg`�R'� ,_�"'= mks "M�,elw !r`F[?K!�,.wr•!!rnnettt�. w _
r --_
f. ' �aUC:NkE
t°;
r•1'V OF !'�1APL••t•�ii�OD
`�T) ;./ /��i%
s
1 :;:9
VU1.1t.:��
:.Fi Hf- REGISTER TEFi
f
f'O R PE R. 10 D '06
i
C-
}`i��
3
C. VE- N
;t , :: �
NUM BER
DATE
NAM
DE: CR IPT I
AM OUNT
AMOUNT
6
�+ � t p� i . . ...._. _ ........ ..
_
.. ......� ... , ., .. _. �y
+fir �-
8
iU
1
. �..>-._. �_--._.._. w_._:-'---_ �,:,.._
35 0880 35 0880
�...._..._.::....,.., w...._.._ �r�.-. �..._..,._._
06 / ZZ / 8 9
�,.. �..._ �., �__._... �.. �..r.•......_,_:
HOt� GRO IN,C
��__.._.,_:,.__ �..::. �.. n.....• �.,._ �:._::,,..:._..._.;._. �......, �. Y: ��._>. r:.-.. �..>_. �.._. �.::.__....:.... w.
CON SU L TING FEtc-
��.._.. r:.__. �.. �._,..._...�._�..�..�_..w....._ .�._ _ v
1 ;j';�,
.r..._... w �., .. � ..,�.. M:::....,.._ ,_.,...,....:�.:�_:.._,..::
�:�:,.�,r„�.;..:�w_:.. ..,..,.._ �::a,:.
100
5 .:
0
H JUDITH
VEH A LLOWANCE
1;x.91
13.91
�
1 �. �..
t �., /3 r .1
Yt1 A H , t,:t`M "•
L to T ft A Y
_, t`�j
._..
15�
•1
i
8O ZOO
0 6 M me Zw-
I,G.M.A.
DU »K
�+'� ,r�
�'�
!,., 124
400
0
J . & J . TR
PROGRAM �.,UPPL tES
27 .50
27 •50
221
s f
is
_ • r r r . _ w w n••• r .•
4
}� �'}'} } + i:•'� r/ '�1� Vii• f } iy�r•• {�-
[ i,.-: � L�` .. �' tii' .`.� � � `wI "4/! � � � � f ' :t � J A � {- • � .J M.: 4' `� i : -
j t7 , r •. ._, , .__
� � �� 4. 4w- � � ., �r, 4.�
_.,. _...., . _ >.,....- .._ .. ..,- 4+. � ` . y . �5 •;«
�.... _ ....� , .., ,. f. ,•
, , . ,.. ...._. - ,+a.!.}... R �_�... ,,.,....
.-. _.,... , _- ,..<.....
24
....: � �.
i i
1�1
t 1
T
i+�•
�.f f Z ! h
'-e r' s;l 1 1 �i.. �4.! �.t :
+.i i .� 1 l.. 1 Y .. 1..
{w
R:7 "'>I'
.
...•......... w................. w<..... w<-•-+• w.+ n+r.•,:.•r.w....w........«..r.
,1
,
.,.»...,.. ..•a.....- ..,.w>.>.'+••.c .., ..... ..,
. _
nr. +.. '. su�:r - : w•..w...,.,,w+ .... u..•...... wa..- .- ....+......+.......w,•... . w.,. r.•..,.,.-_..,+,-.,_..,
.,..�..- ..w,..r......,._,.._ -._ . _._... .. ,.. ... ..,, r•+.- . »,....
^
hh
#,,,3 1:48
410350
06/22/89
KART,.S, FLINT
TRAVEL ,s: Ti
1
11.30
30
a1'
{�41
i2 41
{ _
w _ r
_ w
r
_ _ _ _
7
a
33
1 ,t
P •• .
�. ,}
r' �•' a 1,
�: 3. � 4?► 0 :
/y t ':
iFt - / .. Z / . 9
�• c i
K 4. E' 8 A T H L E T I
c. i 1�
F i . l 1 �1 l .r +.lj ...i �..:a
a ;
34
��»
ryu
4
.- <w.- ,-- ..- .- r- •.•- ••.•..•. -
..... ---- ^.+.r.. -r�
>.
.,.r.,...
,f- ��� /r••t . ( y n � ,_..::�•s. i i
}p� '..` 1.1 t 1 A 1 1 s.} tJ � ! f._ � �.. ►wF. _..._. .-_
P 1 �
_ � � >�: �
•
�
PROGRAM Si.1i- PL 1 Ems'
e:1. 0':90
3
1 3a 1
P ROGR AM S UPP L I �.�~
1 1.. 5
::.51 .7 0
_ _ ... ...
40
f 3t
i ry
1.w
P � 9
TOM
^'�clt;�AM1
'.,,<.3:..
•;
9 . 0
dt
} L
( a:>
343
133
f 341_
o�_
l 4 .
' "'�
L'
_, .
���4i'..� rte. .., _.r._
{l4
11461
1
i
f3�'
1 253
i3r'
4 0
06 / ZZ / 89
LEAGUE O F MN CITIE - < FUND
S LIL -��; .s h�l1:11t: +EELS
1 - {82.00
1 182.00
j47�
f
}48
!w r
1 ,., 1.., 4
,. ��
4f�0 565
,. •� ., r ..
U 6 / .r Z �
.. .,
LE MA I I"
_, �� YL - {;,' 3;,'+ tW r!
J U MEN S .Y L. US SES
.�^[ .-� •.�
8 („ .00
' •�_.
6 :316;
1:}i
8UBttsZe. 4 _NE�W,�EtA` ERS
� ft M��:Et+ H jH -_ E ,
�....�
1~'ULLi: HIND
t::t;.ist
�0,o0
ib41
[
1
: [
4 "iU 1b
06/22/89
LU - 1 "�., J - .,-AN14. -
..f
1 Z t,7
4 9 0Z O O
06 / Z , -' / 8 9
LrUGE L F C O.
SUPPLI E Q UIPM E NT
T .3.9
�.
+:L
1 •.`
F U �� Jj (
0 i / i. i . ! »� .•�
M. a �� A a
F f L P' 1 E{ { A ii wJ 1 �! L, E�
�
3 7 . til tr
( . a �:�
, r 5
�Ua
Ili31
lui _ ,.._
�I 1:59 -
_ _
_ _
()6/
, , n ...._ -
MAL;L. 6
1"����GRA REG . :FEES
F � � U
�.�0
104
a
1.� 60
5' 11600
06 /ZZ /8 �+
M.ASYS CORP
REPAIR a; MAt IIiiI /k:
1 ! � � �. tt .
1 , 13Z .00
}��r
Jt i
1 Z 6 1
,
� F�
5z
0 6 /ZZ /
MCCANN A S l SO+.r I A..r.E 1 I .r N
C PY14 r
964 a 50
964;50
' 2 r
a w pw.
.0"00
ca "/22/89
MCGL11RE, MICrAE,.
a LE ALLOWANCE
, " cjE� .
C�. r,
',
1
I
5301ZO
06/2/89
Ml E� ,. MYRNA
1''ROCYRAtai;a
1c; ����
�2.c:�0
,1
�1._ ,
_
_
, .V {�iUC:IARE
C I ` ' C{1= IYIAI�'�.« � ►� {::� �
PAGE 10
'
j�+H , .. .. � (` ,'j ..1 _. E �• �,
•
:� �'. C M
I Tf." M
3
NUMBER
NUMBER
DA'C'E
NAME
W SCR iF *' ION
�:'�
AMO UNT
AMOUNT
�l
I
r `
REPAIR MAIN`C /E
154 =:8
6 -45`
to
}
1 L� 5r
s E rL;
�3 ; /�►
ME ' .A L. TO �
[ ., :.. t
_..,:
_ ........_ . _.. .�, :
. _
12
1266
531675
06/22
�..
1YiE TERR
�. R I 1 T
+ f CLOT
{{ q
U � I � h t� r
20.00
20.00
� 5
1267
'7
.� 40U5
: 06/22
MI DWG: ST ANIMAL s%ERV I t_•E
i EES FOR uERV I C:E
2 , :_� r 1 .6 5
2
i
�Ifj
jig;
i
.
__ .._. , ..�
'+
��`�
�.,. ,j
�C.�/ + f'!
yy( �•.:{�.��•:..:: yam .�«..•. ; .., ._ .. ._.._f... �,..frs _. ._.<_ .. p . � �••. __ , _..._... ....: _....:
1'idf L 1'If fi�1.`��gMri1.•w
-_ .........:.._ �`' } ` �:1Ef� �» • .. _........ ..
i i.>7 1 l ;l V� _�
-.. .....
S
_....- ......_ :.'.� r
'��j'
»...•,._
}
r
,.. ..
MIKES � ,ter .. P G A S- SERVICE T
�Ehl EIS
1
�(. PF L Fw VENICLE
$3 3 1
I
t . l �.�
� 4 0 i i 0
06/
. 2. 5.+
M C OMM
i t J 1 .:1 / / i + 1 �i . I F11..
. i�
fi
[l
�f
tt
/�...r /� +:
11#�f•1w, T� ��.f I I I
OTIHLR - CON "T _( O-ST -S -. _
.�-
31
1
5517. U
0 6 /2 ;:: /89
MN REC.. �. P ARK , A SSO C I ATION O
P
r
�3,4
I1'
i� -`
E`a .0�
E _ t �
6 0
:
Fir
7
_
ry��
1�7
57r 0 090
GA EN 81809
MA IItiIT MATERIAL.
T F
M A I ICI C' M A 7 E I l I L. A
9
;35j
1274
570145
06 C22 89
MORRISON JOHN
P GRAM %S
9.00
. 9.00
t.37
:yam,.,..._._.....
j
-.,.._ :.." -- 5 1 ..- , •- »..w . 1"• , �- ...o..
- i\t-T!, _
.s. w
_
1
.���� ..- ...
ti
-_.... .. _.. ..
7
22 8
Moi JE `
'
�CI }
i t «, t�.l I M
1 .4 - C i< �
}� r,
.. � •7 w 1.� 0
t
�:_,
I
1277
6 1 0 0 30
06
M U L 1__EM, LORI E
P R OGR A MS
1 2 -
1. 00
X 4£1
.
f
47
•
t -
----....._.�. ,•
•- ___...,... Nom... :. _ .• .�. � •-, _�_ _.... , r _ _...... .__. 'i_.:..
L..k It l«If � �.4.•�.
r�l. a �
46
4 � }
�` 1 . ••�y �- ••-.- . >�:'
�?
t
12-7 9
630??25
0I6 /ZZ /89
NATIONAL BUS INE8S WOMEN ` S
I t1 A �f C L. TRAIN
' Iii
5 9 w �� �
� � �y Ems}
Sol
;
t
128
6 3 0 96 0
0 a9
N
kE.F•'A I MA I ICI`C /E..
16 6,�
R EPAIR MA I / E
16 ~
1 56
r
r
`C
'
5
REPAIR .:.: M Al Iii / E'
w ;! .
REP M A / "
1 ,, €i„3
f471
FZEPA I R � MA I HT /E
1 c. • ; E�)
r
i6d
'
r
f� l
R EPAIR :: M AI M "r' / E
16.
12-2.0
}r4,
gin#
. 1 1
640
0 89
i�1E 1...801 JEAN
S/ EH � t. L. A
L
17.71'
1
4 :.�
f
^� ,y Y V f L� J
t J f.�•� �. 2 ! L+ :
�.j ,� T j a`Si ,�. �.( .j�, [� .. y,� _.. .: -.. _........,.. .:..... _. ... .......... ... :. .-.... .. ...__.., _..... ..
N G« F. a l 4.1 i s ; 11 i T
...- ......_ ._. . ! ,�^ 'S. { :�. - }�, � .. .�•� �t•' �•' �.C". C�" C•1.
C f k..� G R !t, t R 1,.,, 1.1 1 +... ° _ :.J
•� - +y
1?7 :�_ w /� «T. . _.. ._ . .... .. . ........_
... .�«� �+''�
..... .,.- .......,. .,. .� t.� • V
_
atr
,;�
f �•r�i
s
1 _,
.. f
,/ .:_,. /8 -�
Ni►RDkUlei , SHIRLEY
F i,►...t��RAM RE:.k2if I ` TR T I
��
4 . 0�}
�� . E � E �,
.'
U TI L I «C' I S
176 .60
.."
UT 1 LI'rlc``
.:
_
'- OUCHREC;
I OF MAPLI WOOD
PAGE 1 1
11 i
' ' 6/ 15 /89
14. 2
V !-f E: { . htE R
+,
p y
VOUCHER /'
.�
3 Y
CRZC'K
N UMBER i
iU E:k
)ATE
AitE
DESC:R IPT IOf�i
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
�
6 1
6
_ t > __.._.
_
I
p Rfi �:J � t , J U i' t L. d . �.t
**-.., ,> M
f i L (� .� 7 R 11 S l.t + i' ? . l T:. ►:1
z /:1 r J�
'T y r
t t
ti
am
12
j
R EPAIR �.;: M AIN T / V
.; + /y L�
� Lr j_: � 'i
14'
REPAIR & M A 1 N / V
49
tI
r
�_. _...... ._.. , .._....
... .... ..
R t.,. P A I R 1a: M A •� N t /: �
t
„
REPAI : MA INT /V
�
R EPA i� & M A I I M i l Y
C} • -. .
ill E A R X55 A Fri
' 1
R s.7C M A I N i / Y
6.13
2 6 8 1
22i
J189
-- EQ1) i E ME NT
1288,
691600
00
STEFZ A�IUF EA
P OSTA G E.,
t ` � .
ii
C
.
:'
0
1 289
70
06 / 2 2 /89
P . C. SO LUT I ON S
S O
50
0
:i
...... >..... :.
. «. ....., .. ..,:. :.... a -. .. ,. .. _., f:'i
C i
�� _. � R Ft M ,� t..i P l.. 1 E. +.J
f�3
i34
C
r
711
Q 6/Z * Z/
PETERSO P. A.RB ARA
EtiO k _. « *'
a.29'/
711400
06/ZZ/89
PE MAINTENANCE
F 01 L
FUE O IL
5 1 .' �97
;381
��� ,. ?' �
451 � 7 2
9:3
1150.0:
06/24 4189
PHo"ros TO GO
FEE$ FOR SL
'RVICE
17.o 3
PROGRAM UF�'f�.. ' E ,
I
4.65
�r ` t
3
-..,....- v......,-.__._._.
ww. w• e.,..:_,... a.:. a..., Yrw_ w.-. r.
a. r. . diwrw.:rSrr�.:V_....._.:.a.,. _..__+- .....,,...._..
t. .•.- ,wW!.. -, .-:v of
,
. +,.......- ._: ...,... ...,.+_. -,.. iMm.+.wea+- ,ter... ,w- +++.:.+.MMw
.,_-
w.+
t i:� 'x�
720400
t l r.:• .f. c: /
PO 4 � B I N � K I } LA
� t't ± 1 � a �i A �1 R f�. to I ,�, i" f� A T I �.; N
94
9. 00
!a
0
2 8 9
R A I N D 0 U. DS
PR Go R S U P F Ll LS
451 i49
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
PROGRAM I ES
PROURA11 - I ES
6.13
a�
P S LJPP L I E S
33.
J i
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
"44•_
141, -2 .3
Hi
f
.
1...�
`�'�"1'
�r.�.�`1..1�`���
. _ ..,. I�A`t'�.al.'� t,.• „ U1�'�"'�`'_MI*`"� - �� �` "��`RV�:t:. �.�
. J, � �
I
'
it �
i 7
?��• ..�._''
.�.. I �
r 8 r.
� - 3 fJ a':. C:. {! . �
I �
i �y r_ _� 1
1 � 7t a,l � U ..t �..i �«. f) ti.
_� KARE
1 f'
E'Rt�i�t�At+1 ��E�i ���:.�..
FEES u�j
.M ��
' f
.
{
F r 0 �
r,3
i
.,
64
1298
74Z900
06i4 M 89
SAY' DAMS SONS
$UF PLIES JANITOR
; br;�
REPA MA NEHULE
3111z�5
5 7'�4
i.
7 5 O O;:a O
06/'
R E M z N G "i• t:.+ N E L k, C '1` R 1 C
S . t , S
J41
r
t. U
7-61, ._ ,_..
_
_ -t3 r- .f .F .. f �.� !
t�c U A i + Ui f :
�:1. ;j ht {~ � ` 7 E
:., . ^
Z9
;
,
.Jt >:
u, {
13
762 o
06 ,� w �: / rat9
ROYAL. DOWNS
F='R0G tAMS
� 6 10
=aE
:,!
I
Y 1:*1UCHREG
C:IT
0l= M L,Er'Wf)0D
P A G E:. 12'
1
: 2 9
- V0at fit
• 'E';
VF.NVOF3
fimE* 1
.
:V'E_ND0R, H
1 T . M
`E'F. t _.
._ .__..._..
_.__.._w ..a,...
.`
NUMBER
NUMBER.
DATE
NAME
1)1 SC.R1PT10hl
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
�
71
. ... w . �.
�..f f �� ', �` �� � t�+,'.� � F i'V � �� ::, �.4;# 4l t..� �..• I !v �� 4.Y �1 ..
t „t l' f �•, � � ..J ” f [:
'�.� M �^
� M •� +.J .
: U �
8' �
06 /7 /89
SE:EGYER MA JO O ' �
E" Eti RAM REG
17 0�
�..`
�
y
►° •:.t: ,:►
�
1i . oo
1. t��
�:��
{ l / �; �!
;E 1 �L L.AN LI , C AL. 1 T I i �i+1
;=�L1 , =�� M E: M T�E -F��:
� . ti�
50 .0 0
a.- ...�.., .. ._,rr..r. -. +r..:m.rr- w.+....
..+�,,.,,.• vP .;,
r �p- ..w v ..- ._:._. ,. ',....wr,........-- +.,._.. .�, .. _ _.._ ._. _ .._._ w
t 1 , f_
_.. _.
_ '.'C _ = f.•_...._v ....
._
.,. �._ _.
�..,.,.... ...,._.. ..._.,
iI
I 1306
8 ►:. 0 1. 15
0& / /
o IEr•, V E RS JI L L.
P ROG RA M REGISTRATI
a
1
1 5.r)t,t
h
W
sj 1 07
820650
0 21'2 89
SNY DER ` S DRUG
PRtiGRAM SUPPLIES
22.47
�{ °�
22 r 4 f
f t
'.. / ..'`��+•��, .. '. . �/ -.�`' "j!��� 'j '�'���{ _'7�
����� ,•.J .� i��L'� W OF�� (T \ +I t / � Yi �•
� { ,���•i+ jj }w�'�' � ,, j1
,rI W 7 1 :4.. 4.r. L:F� / �' � ��
.._., n.w.a_ ._.. n,. r ...._ ✓. -_, ...n. >.., wa. r
~ �e
:
SUP L
13 F E~' 1..1 F Ct F F I C E
6025
.�
�,.J U � i � � !._. ,.J •� � �'• i. -4•.�
:. - ... , ��. M 4. �;.., .. . +_,
u _ w.r >..ur_,. .ter. ». ..1_,. _. .,.,. ... . vw..,.
a .. ,._ .. �..
•1.
S U PPLIES OPF I ``E
•.•fir`.._
�
i.
SUP r-
ihr!
1
!� +QL+� ,� -pr , f -� +� }�ywy y •� �� �q� �"
i a `.r r '_J wt i V' �..' 1 �..+ , L 1 L L,r f S \ �.3 i :.1
»•�� '� ..•�!., _ j .. .. .. ..
j �f •� [� '
i j i
.... ,- r ..,,:. -
l, � ( •:J
.............
. .. ... _. _
�
;{
S U P PLIE S
U E._ E' I C E:
3.
SUP O F FIC E
3 5. 6 1
SUPPLIES OFFICE
42
SUPPLIES OFFI
117,
�43�
rl
i
3 1J PP L I E' t V I C E
!-
i 1'
tQ�e
145
SUPPL.I ES O F F I C E
P L *23% f
S U P P L I ):.' O �F• E" 1 #•
14 r r+7
•�
,� f r i f.:f.
1 46
47
t
.. ... __ ., _,... _...._,._.._.:,. _...,__...., .._. �.....,,..:- -..y -. .w..,. -�+,.. _- 4R:'..,r,... ..
- .: .. , •r.-- .,•- �•r -.-• •.•,.... yam- - `-- ..- •,•.-- •�- „- .••......._� .
__ .....�:.•�.. .� - - -
-
r
{ r'
' :3
nJ 1 �J
4 t j
t f I � t
... 1.,f _
,�+
l 1 ,�. e
0 4 � A.. e� /
r ►» '!L `( yy.�.. ! »y 1 w y!•
f� : c ' ON
S T. H 1 J� U 4.r A.. �w' � � lw� � � f J.
�}•�..- c • {�
f `.r ice .:
t..1 U 1 i L 1 !.-. ,..� OFFI ' ..
�w
� !
� �r. •.•E W
t�
i
i
..
..,
t�
..w:: ._ ..... _.._ ....,,.. _ __ .:_ .:._...,..•:. -. ..., ,_._,._.,._.
.._.CA. �f s {T p / ] .... . ...
tj EQ
.w.,_..,_.. ...,.._ ...._.,.. _....._ ,., ......,..._. ..___..,.......,. _..:..._
"..9
..>...._.•,.,...�__. ........... .._.,...._..,... .._ _....._......._...__,....,....
.. «r
1 y,r 1 1
f J
,�f4
06
S T - P AUL CANDY ,.� T0 AC•C•0, INC.
r
P RO G R A M S U P PLIES?
70.
7 0.30
55
1
3 i
i.f 2.
84
f::2 9
S T PA UL CITY OF
REPAIR M EM /FI
..
5
-
�
i 57
j�f3
3
•_r i .. ,
=, 4 s f ". #j
n.
T . PAUL R A ftS E fis t`:_ D I t A L I . � N
� l� t t f :a
1 .� �; , t� t�:..
1 �,.�. p .��
1x:14
C .. a
842 •,x::5
0 6/22 ' / 89
S TATE: UOF MIN a O7'A " -CP Pk
S UF: , S MEMBERS
-_ . {:i �
L � 06
1 63�'
J
,
r�4�1y s ;4�
�.}L7 /'�� 189
St. -A i E it T". MII�fi�4E .:!�� i ����N43{�tom.R
Mice.MB * RSt "iJ f"
�� • {���
�� r�`+.
61
6A
67
f ,�
1317
• fI _.:,.:._.__..
150
... y;y. ...,:.c�!._
r� ,z
06 /_ /8 9
, �a0 .- ` _ . ...: _._ . .._....- - - - - _...__....__...._....
aJ T i \ ' lJ ,.. i A/ A L.. •
SU P
.._ :>, 'fir.. �y/ { r� { _, {F
-. `..i -.1' 1 .. t�. 4.I ..J J 1 .7. t,�
PRO ;:1 UE-'E "'
.5 fp♦
•�,.. r L,1 l„� -•..
93 r0 0
.,.. *.,/'�...
2. _...
9 -A•0 0
_._._..._. �a
��i9
110,
71
�72
i
+ ,.f1 rf
8 1' 4 }
C� J / f / .�.+
� ,�TE:.M�J .r ER VI CrE* C01`1 fANV
� �:f' 1�s t � _, M AID! "! IU
1 I�
1 1�i
) L4
i t
.1
1
_111 oil 1111- 0
"N , �� ; .
CITY OF lei AF�L��WOO��
P AGE 1
i
i
i
E:,1
,/
/ED:�
14:29
VijUC:l-
ff t R�' !-�EC:K REGI T�.is
4.;
FOR PERIOD' 06.
S
l
_..1
_
7 � { 3fr• TIC t���•...._.:•._.._ ....,_..._.. -� [ s-• 'R + 7 F ♦7
CI R-
t 4.. 1,• 1 •. r L. 11 Af 'J f
_
.— :...,... ......... .r l . .... .... . .
t f ` 41 t
., _.
... f / t i X 7� tT••}`},,
V 1.i •t/ •,.• 1
_ _..
} r
L..
_.. __� _. v..._. « __G;t:-�y C M.,
i / e �t
• _..:r...,•_.. -..- _..
.._. -../w. HECK
I iJ M i
„•„- _.: ,
d
N U M B ER
NUMBER
DA "E"
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
A
S
t JI *� {3
�t / 2 2f+~t .}
T. .f . A tit0 P A�t� 8
9Uh I' I�1E3 Vt:.h�
4!.s6._4K:..
� . :.�,8'
g
1320
860.1 Z5
0 6& Z / 89
`f' A. SCH •..Y S UN $ , INC
M AI N T M A T ER I - L
ti::44.Z
_.__
_ �•�-
-
{i41
1
8 e.+3 { 15
{ Jrt /2t « 8 9
1 . J . T. SHIRTS
LJ N 1 0RW%3 ?: Ci..0 ! H
317.40
r
i
__
ilbi
U N I F 0 RM S S. C L 0 H
17.40
J `
?
lw`ROGRA, SU�h�'f. I E;1
i
...... . .....
... ....... . .....
� / , n,
; f
t
1322
8 G 0 3 1 5 J
0 6 / �f 2. ,/ 8 9
l . K. D. A �►
OUTSIDE F.. i ti G M 1 i... '.. ►.i
1 w '"� +J.
L
•22�
++
w..- tvi._..
•- ru,- �H.. t. w+ w.. w. w.,, ar«. v+.. �-+_. m_... w.. �._.._ rr,+ �•. e+: naw...•,.•. �r. .n..Y. + -. _ .. .� _ k ... .• .,. _ _ .. Y: •'!: -. _ v11__
_ ,. ,n _�,•�e• .• r._ it t �.t 1) E.Nf -` _« . M v: 4
t ti' ,
..
•u,�b_•• --r-w , - •«n- 1+:,
-r
,
is E
l
O U T :.: E �: j ��d
i i . v
13t1t
�
i
0U T S 1 E r
� ��r. w tt 0
j3f!
I
icol
E I tl . r
{
i. y,A ► + s.A
�+�{'� (�
.A tl.� �f ' 1 a V
/ ±. . I
i i A ] 1 " T !'
is
e.J 1,l l . i ' 1. r.J 1 1. • 4..
66 p : 5 9 ''" '
,3E1'
r
P R OG R A M S #.e
4.L"61.03
I
,/ Z
1 •-` 4
`�
►w�
#y? I 8
0 6 1f! L... �
,
A W �'� s
J H. 1 1 i Lw 1 ! K� i N 4.1 1" 0 i..• R C. E V
�"
..;t U P T'" �.,.- i E to V E H i C L E.
-
401
4
R M
5
4 2 1
REPAI MAI i' 1l
��� I
.- R • .a A _�,.N -T L I'le ...: Q� .• +� + vw w-T
Y 1 I F i F_ . #.■
w• wM.w wu Yn ..wr + y ra +
H
( �i '. r � .
�
V E l" l I C• L.. l.'". a:1
y 5 Mt 7 ,�(
0
X461
3��,'
V EH 1 C L. G.- ad
5 0, f 4 8 a if 0
7 6, •� 5 6 • 2 7
l r;
,{
1:3 z19
86'w640
06/Z'.:/89
THOMA.LLA, CAROL J .
PRQ SUPPL
1z 00
1Z. ()o
j•a,t'
E f' A,...I R _ - M A' J N T ' / _..: __
—.
.._ T,_ .. _.. _ .., . ._ T M.
_ -,.:0.
1 32" 7
6
0 6/'Z 1
'( c: i _r Y TR
Th'A
"0.0
,.`
YI
e_.. 8
900100
U 6 / 2 Z / ;N' 'fit
U N � ��;� �f !� `�� U N f_. (l� :! T �: i�
U N I l"' u R lrl `� "` C. L i 1 T h
�, .c -
U C -+�'
i1etaa
_
fl(3�
1
4+ !
� �'
1 3 2 T ' 1
9
• f •T twG
� � f :.. �:. 1 � G•G 9
N BU i 1
U t4 .�, �� �. � 1:' W •�'1 I � � .�.i �:.i j'� !'�l � � i � � �. �
~ ,. , i
, �,� 7 "� �' �....t � :'.� 0 �' F � �.,• l':
�_
1 � 4 a �« C..
- 194.2
t,3
,
106
0 G r` 2:_. ,�, f 8 �+
UN i 'V E R S AL ME i t.,• A L
2 U #- P L I Es 1,. Q. 1.1 f, t� h 1.. N f
6.4
� CSI
69
I.FU,
ltittj
1
9 0 1 450
{,j .:: 189
URD.IHA; R 0 E
PROGRAM REGISTRATION
Z5.00
z15 .f.}c:�
t
.: •J ►..
9 1 t„) 0 5 0
0 { ! / d.. ,.. / t,,,t : `
Y « W a E i i' 1 1 � .• 1'•. E A wJ t.,1 {...� t • 1 A ! E S � I N C w
i`.! U P i • L 1 E S O t' 1 J 1 + I.w
,� 0. �C 1
I `.l r 'T 1
f J3+
�71�
1 64 1
, .
;,�
�`
131 i }3
E S t � (I h� S f », � 1 Y I F,..
7 M- • u t«�
S�✓ l,:' . a „} {„j
i
s ` LL � _
wi
P A Ej E 14
{-
,jr,:.�j.,ft,
,: -,
,
9.4 .t .r
�.
I:3 r _. ��
- V 6 " . ' r `' !': : T R
C: j
is
a
1t 0 U CH c Fi f
1.
'i
r.
-�
- .+...yam _ .�. .� _ ...__. .._. .: :.. ., :
i L i �F. {y��7 (�� j • I 1y.
♦ .. � � L. .. ... .. .. V f t.. a.. ,I .. v'1 7Z L.. � � �. � t� � � t..,� t � 14 d � R.» ! �
_�...Y:._� ....� __.,.... _..__.__...... _ � t . ir. .. it.t L . �J/ !� 1{
�- «.._... -... d� ... _ .._ _ . ._,
. �» 4.. iw. L i _ t ..��.1 l ._ ,.. Li L». �� Y � l.• F•»e ~`
_. .. . ._., .-.. .. ,•.,..._ - _-• - -
_ _...
- � - *• -�,�•�
�._ - _ •'�'`• (�_/ ..
' ,
� f , �.
1, 3 3 5
tt f o 6 2 Z y .•.
9 W H I T E
l
l
.,- • -' 3 6
9 �. 15 0 0 � / �. �. ,�` t t t;; f W O R k. D OF' L E I,3 U R E
T R A V E1_. - E R A I N
is , . #`
388
t5 �
U - r C p,
7 C i S L I .�'a
7
-
� J ' I P 1.- I C. I3 i �t t1i 1..' ( �I 1 •
L»
l 1 `i G r t..,
,{ 8
j Ylt
•'I
p .
DU (}» C O
t/''�� f• `gyp
•
J .38
i
t ?:
1ti'tit
t� t:,.,
p-;05 0 . 0 j2 89 Z . � M A N l1 F Att:TU R I NG
COMPANY SUPPLIES JANITOR
� �K
2 w A 0
;•,
'
C.
q
t
In
:l -33 :
:+..t0 0 06/22/89 Z I EGLEh Z NC� .
`s '' t:
t � ra�ev
�:
.f �
r'.
�I
j
34�
,
T C�
i
„
w
371
381
,
121
j
471
{501
!
-
11rf
5�i
(5n
i
1
I :
...w -__.w. .•- r._.. w.,:.... r ..._v_.- .•._.__.�._.., _.._. ,_...,.v._,..._�. �.-.v +.. n,} 3"} Mw Y_,._+•-•.'- r^ w, w... ��. r-+-_...•_... ......__...r .:..._.,.� - ._:....,_ +..r..._..._
r�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/02/89
CHECK #10006 - CHECK #10166
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
McGUIRE, MICHAEL A.
2
BLACKSTONE, GAIL
1
ZAWACKI, KATHRYN
1
BEHM, LOIS N.
1
JAHN, DAVID J.
811.88
SWANSON, LYLE
972.01
CODE, LARRY J.
276.80
OSTER, ANDREA J.
902.28
MIKISKA, WILLIAM
172.80
FAUST, DANIEL F.
2,033.30
TAYLOR, LINDA
1
MATHEYS, ALANA K.
1,093.83
VIGNALO, DELORES A.
1
ANDERSON, CAROLE J.
1
LA MOTTE, MARLENE
182.00
AURELIUS, LUCILLE E.
1
SELVOG, BETTY D.
119.00
SCHADT, JEANNE L.
1
KELSEY, CONNIE L.
522.04
VIETOR, LORRAINE S.
972.68
HENSLEY, PATRICIA A.
562.01
JAGOE, CAROL
732.68
CARLE, JEANETTE E.
957038
OLSON, SANDRA
571.13
COLLINS, KENNETH V.
2
RICHIE, CAROLE L.
954.28
SVENDSEN, JOANNE M.
1
NELSON, ROBERT D.
1,800.50
FULLER, ELAINE
366.34
OMATH, JOY E.
972.68
MARTINSON, CAROL F.
936.68
STILL, VERNON T.
1
SKALMAN, DONALD W.
1
FRASER, JOHN
698.43
NELSON, CAROL M.
1
MORELLI, RAYMOND J.
1
STEFFEN, SCOTT L.
1
ARNOLD, DAVID L.
1
BANICK, JOHN J.
1
BOHL, JOHN C.
1
CAHANES, ANTHONY G.
1
CLAUSON, DALE K.
1
MOESCHTER, RICHARD M.
1
ATCHISON, JOHN H.
1
YOUNGREN, JOHN
1
PELTIER, WILLIAM F.
1
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J.
1
WELCHLIN, CABOT V.
1
LANG, RICHARD J.
1
RAZSKAZOFF, DALE
1
HERBERT, MICHAEL J.
1
DREGER, RICHARD C.
1
STAFNE, GREGORY L.
1,498.98
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/02/89
CHECK #10006 - CHECK #10166
EMPLOYEE NAME
BECKER, RONALD D.
HALWEG, KEVIN R.
STOCKTON, DERRELL T.
PAULOS, JR., PAUL G.
BOWMAN, RICK A.
KARIS, FLINT D.
HEINZ, STEPHEN J.
GRAF, DAVID M�
THOMALLA, DAVID J.
PALMA, STEVEN T.
VORWERK, ROBERT E.
BERGERON, JOSEPH A.
MEEHAN, JAMES
MELANDER, JON A.
SAUNDERS, SARAH
EMBERTSON, JAMES M..
WILLIAMS, DUANE J.
RABINE, JANET L.
STAHNKE, JULIE A.
BOYER, SCOTT K.
WALDT, CYNTHIA
RYAN, MICHAEL P.
FEHR, JOSEPH
NELSON, KAREN A.
FLAUGHER, JAYME L.
WEGWERTH, JUDITH A.
HAIDER, KENNETH G.
CHLEBECK, JUDY M.
MEYER, GERALD W.
KANE, MICHAEL R.
NAG E L , BRYAN
LUTZ, DAVID P.
KLAUSING, HENRY F.
SCHMOOCK, JOHN
HELEY, RONALD J.
OSWALD, ERICK D.
FREBERG, RONALD L.
CASS, WILLIAM C.
LINDBLOM, RANDY
ELIAS, JAMES G.
PECK, DENNIS L.
PRIEBE., WILLIAM
IRISH, BRUCE A.
GESSELE, JAMES T.
GEISSLER, WALTER M.
METZ, TERRY
LOFGREN, JOHN R.
ODEGARD, ROBERT D.
BRENNER, LOIS J.
KRUMMEL, BARBARA A.
STAPLES, PAULINE
JONES, L.
BOWES, WILLIAM
GROSS PAY
1,454.29
1,561.48
1,378.28
1,083.36
1,416.89
1,390.28
1,415.88
1,467.08
1,586.99
1,314.72
1,467.08
1,390.28
1,494.67.
1,512.75
662.08
1,538.10
1,354.90
1,218.18
1,130.12
1,146.40
890.17
1,561.48
882.84
1,063.10
1,263.78
530.65
2,084.50
1,087.89
1,197.48
1,342.28
824.16
1,139.40
1,197.48
992.68
1,154.28
995.20
1,161.00
1,704.68
995.09
1,469.50
1,334.28
1,331.99
1,635.08
1,570.50
1,310.28
1,286.68
959.32
1,878.90
1,067.88
486.34
1,642.28
72.00
307.50
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/02/89
CHECK #10006 - CHECK #10166
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
TRAVERS, D.
99.00
MC MANN, K.
360.00
MARUSICH, M.
320.00
ANDERSON, ROBERT S.
1
LINDORFF, DENNIS P.
1
GARRY, WILLIAM
932.52
HELEY, ROLAND B.
1
MORRISON, C.
120.00
MARUSKA, MARK A.
1
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
818.28
BURKE, MYLES R.
1,197 48
SHELDON, LEO
76.25
DREGER, KARI
50.00
DAVY, M.
40.00
WEINHANDL, K.
37.50
MCGIVERN, J.
47.50
DAMIANI, R.
25.00
GRAF, M.
385.20
PODPESKAR, KIMBERLY J.
47.50
GREEN, G.
40.00
HERBER, T.
40.00
OLSON, C.
80.00
ANDERSON, C.
45.00
BESETH -J R, RONALD
105.00
FALVEY, K.
40.00
NELSON, J.
30.00
FISCHER, PATRICIA
20.00
WARD, ROY G.
406.40
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J.
1
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M.
1
NELSON, JEAN
449.54
HORSNELL, JUDITH A.
567.94
HUTCHINSON, ANN E.
533.99
FISHER, L.
91.00
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M.
1
BARTA, MARIE L.
945.96
OLSON, GEOFFREY W.
1
MISKELL, NANCY
328.59
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L.
490.58
GENEROUS, ROBERT
333.20
ROBERTS, KENNETH
1
EKSTRAND, THOMAS G.
1
OSTROM, MARJORIE
1
CARVER, NICHOLAS N.
1
LOFGREN, R.
15.75
WENGER,. ROBERT J.
1
LACASSE, CASEY
273.00
NADEAU, EDWARD A.
1,287.32
MULWEE, GEORGE W.
1
NUTESON, LAVERNE S.
1
BREHEIM, ROGER W.
1
EDSON, DAVID B.
1
GERMAIN, DAVE
11239.04
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/02/89
CHECK #10006 - CHECK #10166
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 1
SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 1
$165,177.56
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION
CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION
AFSCME 2725
MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988
METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
L.E.L.S.
Z1 $ 6
Cl 24,045.00
U1 491.36
160.00
U3 18.00
Z2 238.00
P1 526.50
$ 31,729.90
GRAND TOTAL $196,907.46
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAYROLL CHECK ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 06/02/89
CHECK #10001
EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY
------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
ZAPPA, JOSEPH A. 24,154.28
24,154.28
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Z1 $ 12,546.12
MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK #1 2
MN STATE COMM OF REVENUE ST 812.57
$ 15,680.32
GRAND TOTAL $ 39,834.60
AGENDA REPORT
Agenda Number
.Action by Council.,
Endorse ..
Modified...
Re
T0: City Manager ,Date
FROM Finance Director
RE: BUDGE' TRANSFER - 1988 AUDIT
DATE: June 16, 1989
The portion of the audit bill allocated to the General Fund was
$5,040 higher than the budget. This was due to extra work that
the auditors did involving preparation of work papers normally
by the Finance Department staff. City staff time
prepared 1 e
available for audit- related work was limited due to th e large
increase in their workload in 1.988 (see attached activity report).
It is recommended that the Council approve a transfer from the
General Fund Contingency account to finance the audit bill.
DFF :kaz
Attachment
Y
r ip
1987
-
------- -
MO.
- - --
YTD
567
8 -
1
13
127
1,279
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT
DECEMBER 1988
1988
1
-------------
MO.
Y TO
790
8,088
1
15,885
149
1,507
100
1
11.7
1
221
2
203
3
252
2 1 624
280
3
634
5 1 394
616
6
317
3
389
4
6
77
3
164
0
47
0
48
25 317 33 389
837 8 760 9
22 230 25 266
3 39 5 47
1 30 4 53
PERCENT
Ct E
,
MO.
VTD
%
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
_ _ _
.
39%
0%
- - - - _ _ _
Number
_ _ _
of
_ _ _ _ _ _
receipts
39%
16%
Number
of
accounting entries
17%
18%
Number
of
new invoices prepared
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
17%
347o
-- ------
Number
of
- - - - --
manual checks issued
-8%
1%
Number
of
manual accounting entries
11%
21%
Number
of
computer checks issued
-3%
20%
Number
of
accounting entries
PAYROLL
23%
23%
Number
of
checks issued
-50%
113%
Number
of
new employees added
ERR
2%
Number
of
employee terminations
JOURNAL ENTRIES
32%
23%
---------
Number
of
- - - - --
entries prepared
-9%
11%
Number
of
lines included
CASH MANAGEMENT
14%
16%
---------
Number
of
- - - - --
wire transfers processed
67%
21%
Number
of
investments purchased
300%
77%
Number
of
investments sold
Action by Council.:
Endorse d.�,..�..,,
Igo dif i ed�,.,
ReJ ected......,
Date
Agenda Number �
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Staff Services Coordinator
RE: BUDGET TRANSFER
DATE: June 19, 1989
A budget transfer from the contingency account is needed in order
to fund the following expenditures which were unanticipated at the
time of budget preparation last year.
• Field Survey and Certificate of Old City Hall and Fire
Station site - $800. This survey was necessary to determine
the location of the building on the property.
• Police L.E.L.S. Arbitration - $2,.000. Interest Arbitration
for the 1989 L.E.L.S. Contract was not anticipated.
a Update of 10 T.S.P.s for Comparable worth Plan - $1,100.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize transfer of $3,900 from contingency account to account
101 -119 -4480.
GJ B : kaz
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action brC «
TO: City Manager
Endorsed��~~�~��~
FROM: Assi'stan1± City Engineer Modif ied.~���^
' Rejemted_�~�~�~�_
SUBJECT: Geran�um/Ferndale Storm Sewer., Pro'iect 87-20
Acceptance of Project Date.-'
DATE: June 19, 1989
The subject project is complete. Attached are final payment form
for the contractor and Change Orders 2 and 30
Change Order 2, in the amount of $2,648.18, was necessary to
reconstruct a driveway on Ferndale adjacent to the southerly
storm sewer. The initial restoration of the driveway was
disputed by the property owner. Change Order 3 is a summary or
compensating change order. It is a credit in the amount of
$2,249.18.
It is recommended that final acceptance of the project be made.
Approval of Change Orders 2 and 3 is recommended.
BAI
jc
Attachments
f .
Com. NO 9301 art. NO. 3 (Final)
TO City of Maplewood, Minnesota
St. Paul 1\1111n., Iv a l L S 3 - 9 8 9
This Certifies that
Meyer Contracting
Contractor
for Ferndale Street Drainage
Is entitle to Four Thousand .Three Hundred Eiphteer_ & 86/100 - -- ( 4 , 318.8
Final August 22 I 88
estimate for partiA paymcn +gin. contract -wi you dated _ 9
being
TOLTZ, KING, t)UVALL, ANDERSON
Received p avmcnt in full of above Certifi
AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED
£NGthtCCRa AND ARCHITECTS
2500 American National Bank Bldg.
N RACMIK St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
3:9 . 11
14
1
Larry D. Bohrer, P.E.
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
CONTRACT PAYMENTS CREDITS
PLUS EXTRAS I
• lus extras 28,1420
Contract pace p
All previous payments
All previous credits
Ezra No. Change Order No. 1 + 2 , 8 71
4t 44C Change order No.'. + 2
Change order No . 3 Co - 2
9
g (Comp)
Credit No.
<<
t�
AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE
Totals
Credit Balance
There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this
Certificate
31,691
01
Nr rl crr
90
76
31, 691 76
27,372 90
4,318 86
31,691 76
31,691 76
TOLTZ, K 1 NG, DUV ALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
E ng i veer s- Arch i tect s- PI a n ne r s Saint Paul,, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
FINAL
Estimate No. Period End i na ..,..,- May 22.- ..... --.19 2 Pace 1 of 1 Comm. No, -..-.93-01 ---
Project Or i gq i ne Contract Amount
Location Ma n I ew oQd . M t n ne sota .�.. _ ,._...,_._. $gip _2a$ 4 20 -
Contractor,
Total Contract Work Completed -.._..,
Total Approved Credits $
Total Approved Extra Work Completed
Change Order N o. 1 $
Cha Carder No. 2 $_2- 18--
Appr ov e d Extra Orders Amount Com p l e to d
0
Total Amount Earned This Estimate $____ 31 & 69,1_._.76.�
Less Approved Credits $
Le s s ._..,Q_ % Retained $___ 0.29
Less Previous Payments 27. 3.72.a 2-0-.
Total Deductions
Amount Due This Estimate 4-J18 ...$. .�..._.
Contractor L
Engineer
Da to
Date
E ST I MATE N Q,.,, 3 (FINAL)
FERNDALE STREET DRAINAGE
MAPL EWOOD, M I N ESOTA
COMMISS N O. 9301
1 TEM
1
CONST CATCH BASIN N0. 1
1 .00
LS
900.00
900.00
2
REM/D I SP EX CONC CURB & GUTTER
45.00
LF
6.00
270.00
3
REM/D I S P OONC DRIVEWAY APRON
1 .00
LS
200.00
200900
4
REWDISP BIT PVMT AT CB #1
5.00
SY
10000
50.00
5
CONST CATCH BASIN NO. 2
1000
LS
900.00
900.00
6
1 2 RCP CLASS 5 STORM SEWER
164.00
LF
17.00
2
.7
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
4 5.0 0
LF
2 3.10
1, 0 3 9.5 0
8
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. AFRON
6.90
SY
37.80
260.82
9
BIT PATCHING ATCB #1
1.00
LS
200900
200900
10
CLASS 5 GRAVEL FOR DW Y R EPL
66.60
TN
14.00
93 2.4 0
11
DOZER GRADING
15900
HR
6 0 .0 0
900000
8,440.72
D I V I S
ION -1-1 - N�O,E�T�-1 ERN STORM S EW ER
CONN TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN
1000
LS
500.00
500.00
1
2
BULKHEAD ENDS OF 24 RCP
1 000
LS
300900
300.00
3
CLEAR, AND GRUB TREES
6900
EA
150.00
900000
4
15 !PVC SDR 35 STORM SEWER
441900
LF
16900
7,056.00
5
4" DRAIN TILE
215.00
LF
5.00
1
6
STORM SEWER MANHOLES
6 .00
EA
800.00
4,800.00
7
CONN TO EXIST 24" DRAIN TILE
0900
LS
870900
0000
8
TOPSOIL BORROW
0.00
CY
9019
0000
9
SODDING
1550900
SY
2.00
3 ,100.00
10
REMOVE FENCE -
0000
LS
600.00
0000
11
FURNISH AND I N STAG. L FENCE
0.00
LS
1550.00
0000
17,731.00
26,171.72
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Engi veers -Arch Itects -PI anners
St. Paul, Minn. May 24. 19...$.x, Comm. No. _ 9301 Change Order No.
To
for
f or
You are hereby d rected to make "the fof I ow I ng change to your contract dated
Auous 2_2. , 19 $L„� The change and the work affected thereby Is
subject to al l contract st`I put atlons and covenants. Th is Change Order w I
C ) (decrease) ( )the contract sum by , Two T�.us_an_d. ,._w�_,
Hundred- ForJy
- - - - - - - - 1U .Do I I ars � � �_-2.2-49-2-18- .� ) .
This change order shows the actual quantities Instal led at the unit price bid
amounts (see attached Itemization) :
NET CHANGE
Amount of O r i g i n a l , Contract
Addi ti ons approved to date
Deductions approved to date
Contract amount to date
Amount of this Change Order
Rev i sed Contract Amount
(Deduct) $2,249.18
(Nos. 1 .2 ._._..._._.______._...r..1.
( Nos,
Ct (Deduct)
C
I fall Ilii �i��1 V►
B
Da to
Apprave MEYER 00NTRACT, ING
Contract
By
d Da t
TOLTZ , KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCDRPORATED
By
-e-49 - A ?040--
La D. Boh rer, P. E.
White - Owner*
Pink - Contractor
B l u e - TK DA
Yel - Field
Goldenrod - Depar
Green - TKDA M a i n File
*O nly copies needing signatures.
COMMISSION NO s
-PAGEL TWO
item Contract Quantity Unit Net
,do Description Qua to Date Difference Price Change
12,1V_ IS
I ON So- SQU THH E IJ STORM S EN ER
1
1 .00
LS
0
900000
$
0000
1
,I.,
CONST CATCH BAS IN N0. 1
2
REM /D I SP EX CONC CURB & GUTTER
40
45900
LE
+ 5
6.00
+$
30900
3
REMID I SP CONC DRIVEWAY AFRON
1
1 .00
LS
0
200.00
$
0.00
4
REM/D I SP BIT PV MT AT CB #1
5
5900
SY
0
10000
$
0000
5
CONST CATCH BASIN N0. 2
1
1900
LS
0
900000
$
0.00
6
121 RCP CLASS 5 STORM SEWER
160
164.00
LF
+ 4
17.00
+$
68.00
7
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
40
45.00
LF
+ 5
23.10
+$
115950
8
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AFRON
905
6.90
SY
- 2.6
37.80
-$
98.28
9
BIT PATCHING AT CB #1
1
1 .00
LS
0
200900
$
0000
10
CLASS .5 GRAVEL FOR DIY REPL
30
66.60
TN
+3696
14900
+$
512940
11.
D E G RAU] NQ
", __ __ k- - - -
0 __ m__l 5. Q-2-
_HR_
+
+
SUBTOTAL - D I V IS ION 1 + $1,16 7.6 2
_Y.
_S I O-N I- ERR 5IQ RM. S EW ER
1
1 .00
LS
0
500.00
$
0000
.Q.
1
.J- .- _ .h4RIIJ
CONN TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN
2
BULKHEAD ENDS OF 24 RCP
1
1 .00
LS
0
300900
$
0000
3
CLEAR AND GRUB TREES
5
6.00
EA
+ 1
150.00
+$
150.00
4
15" PVC SDR 35 STORM SEWER
453
441.00
LF
- 9
16.00
-$
144.00
5
4" DRAIN TILE
215
215.00
LF
0
5900
$
0.00
6
STORM SEDER MANHOLES
6
6.00
EA
0
800900
$
0.00
7-
CONN TO EXIST 24 DRAIN TILE
1
0900
LS
- 1
870.00
-$
870.00
8
'TOPSOIL BORROW
• 120
0000
CY
- 120
9.19
- $1,102.80
9
SODDI NG
1200
1550.00
SY
+ 350
2.00
+$
700.00
10
REMOVE FENCE
1
0.00
LS
- 1
600.00
-$
600.00
SUBTOTAL - D 1 V IS ION I
- $3,416.80
NET (MANGE ORDER - $2,249.18
C� ANG E ,QR DE R
TOLTZ , KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Engi neers -Arch itects -Pl anners
St. Paul, Minn. &y-2-4, .. 19_$4,, Comm. No. _. 9301 Change Order No.
To Mex er Contracting,
for Ferndale Street Drainage
• V.: =A� •64 1 1= •
You are hereby d1 rected to make the fol I ow i ng change to your contract dated
g,ug s t 22 . , 19 0 The change and the work affected thereby I s
subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. Th i s Change Order w i I I
(increase) ( the contract sum by Tw Tb guraa nd Six
- - - -� -� - _ 8LL O—Dol I a r s (� 2 �. 8 .,18
D i v i s i o n I- Southern Storm Sewer:
Add: 1 Lump Sum - Driveway Restoration 12. �A8 -a 1..2
Net Change Order $2,648.18
Amount of O r i g i n a l Contract
Additions approved to date
Deductions approved to date
Contract amount to date
Amount of this Change Order
Revised Contract Amount
: •0
o
2-
=-4-4-8-A-8-
B yr.
Approve
Date
Co nt r act or
By
)'J14 - 9c,
,.,> '-
D6 to
TOLTZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES., INCORPORATED
B ':: Afw t�< .
L a r D. Boh r er, P. E.
White - Owner*
Pink - Contractor
B l u e - TKDA
Yellow - Field
Goldenrod - Department
Green - TK DA Main File
*Only copies needing signatures.
RECEIVED
MAT 18 196
TeKDJLN
e er Contractino Inc.
19145 Vassar St...
Forest Lace, MN 55025
464 -79BE
TO: TOLTZ KING DWALL /T X I PRUE
0 AKRI CAN NATION.. 'AVF,. bLI v
ST PAUL MnN 55101
RE: MAPLEWOM /FERGA)LE /FINAL
DATE: day 16, 1989
DESCRIPTION
LZ, �__ si
L.tiITT
If P L�'
vQ���
(AJA'•T I T
D BFA 1TY.
w'NMl nM
1 BERKO ilTZ
�Ir*#* ��f* ��IE* �F������r�� #� * *IE��F��� * #���lEl�il *� *�� � *!1�!* �!�►�f� �# �� w � � i �# f ♦ � � � �
1 OBILIZATION 4/17 & 4/25 & 5/6
7. c5
HR
X8. i5
42 -' S4
SUPERVTSION - _5/1
C DAVID.ON
5000 IACKHYC. W /OPERATOR - -4/ 17
p �;,';�� -� DEV
❑ ACCOUNT,,�.t
C? UZZARY
1 b�. t
BOBCAT W /0PERATOR - -5 /8
L.�- -'.
TRUCK W /TRAILER /OPERATOR- -4/17
2. 00
FR
HAND-TAMPER-4/17
11 00
LU. M
50.00
5IL
REMOVAL /DRIVEWAY /DUMP CHS
1100
LLMP
26.0
LABORER - -4/17 1 5/8 & 5/12
11.01
Hsi
c . 613
SHIELY- -CLASS 5
2S.72
TON
Be LS
c:45.15
15% overhead
0.15
LUMP
245.1'3
SHEEPSF'OOT TAMPER
1100
LLIMP
110. e0
110. E-0
AIR COMPRESSOR /HAMMER
1600
LUMP
25.00
c5, 0t
TOPSOIL
3800
YARD
B. C0
24.4,0
PEDERSON -SUBCO NT RACTO R
1.00
LUMP
754.40
754.40
15% OVERHEAD
0.15
LLh P
754.40
113.16
fG . 00
s �- �� -� � ���r -��.� r �.r�+ -w. w�rw..r ���.r
r.. ��..rr � - r�.r.��r
�.► - r
� -- �.. r- - - w r .. w
c� 48.1 d
.. �. � .r - � w - r �
QLSOF �
LZ, �__ si
C) HARTLEY
vQ���
fJ FIEp!;RG
D BFA 1TY.
w'NMl nM
1 BERKO ilTZ
KIRK
BOYER
G B`��3TEt�
Cl KIK Ot.
- ----"
A'�0'OP
C BUD+;F
--j ' ,r'C�
C DAVID.ON
L] MAIN FILE
p �;,';�� -� DEV
❑ ACCOUNT,,�.t
C? UZZARY
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
' ^ WHEREAS , the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has
determined that Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer, City Project 87^-
20, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 07-20 is Complete and
maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city.
Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized.
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
.WHEREAS, the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has
heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 87-20,
Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer, and has let a construction
contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,.and
WHEREAS, it is now necessar and expedient that said
contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project E37-20
Changes Order 2 and 3.
. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that, the ma and cit clerk are hereb
authorized and di.rected to modif the existing contract b
executing said Change Orders 2 and 30
0
AGENDA REPORT
Action by C ouno i l
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collins Endorse d.,,.,�,.,�....,�.
Sub ject: City Hall Maintenance Budget — Re and Maintenance of Bui 1 d!fftfie .
and Grounds Rejecte
Date: June 19, 1989 Date,
Background
The 1989 - City Hall Maintenance budget, for the repai and maintenance of
bu i 1 d i ng and grounds, was approved at approx i. mate 1 y $2,400.
Due to emergency repairs and . a - 1 arge number of repairs required on our
heating system, this amount is inadequate. We currently have a $600 out—
standing bill to cover more 'repai . to the heating system. We also in
need of $800'to fix the tiles that are falling down i'n the Engineering,
Recreation a"nd City Clerk areas, as well as. i n the City Council chambers.
The fall tiles and the potential , for the fal l i.ng tiles are creating a
great deal of concern for the secretaries and other clerical people who
work in these areas and must be fixed immediately..
The cooling season is also upon us: We have experi:enced.problems in the
past with our cooling system and, in anticipation of problems with that
as well as normal repair and maintenance of the City Hall building and
grounds, I am requesting an additional $1,500 to cover these items.
Recommendation
It is recommended.that $3,000 be transferred from the -Conti Fund to
the City Hall Maintenance budget, Repair and Maintenance of Building and
Grounds, to cover the emergency repairs that.have been made, the current
emergency repairs that have to be made, as well as to give operating capital
for the remainder of 1989.
Action Required
Review and approval by the City Council.
KVC:js
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APpLI CANT/OWNER :
PROJECT TITLE:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
Action by Cotnoij&
MEMORANDUM �+"d"rsed^�~�=��=
Modifled_.._�._=�°
Rej emted~�~~~_~~_,
City Manager Dat
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL
831 North Century Avenue
George Dege
Dege Garden Center
June 8, 1989
SUMMARY
Renewal of the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Dege Garden
Center, regulating the use and operation of the off-street
parking lot west of the building.
BACKGROUND
On June 1, 1988, the City Council revised and renewed, this CUP,
which was originally granted in 1971, subject to 11 conditions.
(See page 5.)
Subsection 36-442 (e), states that all CUPs shall be reviewed by
the Council within one year of the date of initial approval . At
the one-year review, the Council may specify an indefinite term
or specific term, not to exceed five years for subsequent
reviews.
DISCUSSION
All 11 conditions of approval are being met.
RECOMMENDATION
Renewal of the conditional use permit for five years, for an
off-street garden center parking lot behind 831 North Century
Avenue, subject to the 11 conditions of approval required by the
City Council on June 1, 1988.
mbecup.mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. CUP approval dated June 1, 1988
X
�� _ O
E'QVBr
0
Loke
W
Y
Q
J
CASE AV
' J
a
Til
32 32 car
2 P
Y � ,3►
V v
X
LOCATION MAP
z
Q
k
Q
d
` LcAt
`
.Attachment 1
Q
I '
I I ,
�o
R L
"N
OWN* nNown
. 1 1 b' o0
177 -INS a U n =IN •
IL
Ai 839•
CV _
a') 835
Deqe Garden Center
t 825 a 831
.-I
a 817 0 _ 814 _ 819
NOW Qj
811, �. .:
804 S
— ( ) • •
5) x 805
..
5
N 4wom..M 1
�•
2 6 � 799 , •
o ..
(2 1) • .
rwy � •
•
�o •
.r.. - . •
---- ---- -- UK=
•;.. .ti .
Ld (3s)
,Z AV
2
� 19
14
C44 .. . .
S 1p
a s
�s� I Cy • •;.•, .•..
. • • • • Q
t� �5 �
u : 4 4 1
• • at
� a
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
Attachment 2
„ .. _ — i•srrsMres
SITE PLAN
4
Attachment 3
4
N
-
f
•
•
•.
•
of It
46
0
•..
'
•• ...
, ..
4044D 400
• .•r •7TH
am man --
STREET
Aqj#4
• •
L.,t
_ �rft/�'t yam' /{ •
j • •, • t ♦ •
•
•
• ,
•
•
quo
ay
.0 ,
o rvau ► j otj&f
•
�
� 1 cr11' Z S • 30'•
.
. •
Ec:jc��
'
tbU•tt
_
•
• , •
x
per • '
1
0
S� �s •
EE
•
rr.
J
>!
•
--- E x i vn 4 4
pmvi -A ous S u aft4
•
•.
i
t o
own
i
t
SITE PLAN
4
Attachment 3
4
N
12. The zero setback,to the R -1 zone to the west is justified since
. the R -1 zone is developed as a commercial parking lot.
13. The existing setback to the south lot line is justified since
the canopy is an extension of the existing building line and
removing part of the canopy to meet the setback would be less
attractive and expose storage and sales items to view.
• Y
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The site plan submitted by Mr. Dege on October 27, 1986, shall
be revised based on a survey of the south lot line and the west
line of the canopy. The revised plan and the remodeling plans
submitted on December 15, 1987, and May 23, 1988, shall be con -
sidered part of this permit, except for any change mu - rip-
proved by the Community Design Review Board..
2. The parking lot may only be used for parking for the garden
center building.
3. No commercial use for sale, storage, display or advertising
signs of garden materials, plants, or any other kinds of goods
shall be allowed anywhere on the legally described property to
which this conditional use permit is .issued or the parking lot.
46 No portion of this site or parking lot shall be used for truck
or trailer storage.
5. Review, renewal or revocation of this permit shall in accordance
with City code.
6. Any trees on the site that die must be replaced.
7. No exterior lighting or speakers shall be allowed.
.8. The canopy shall not be enclosed.for year around use.
9. Sales under the canopy or outdoors shall be limited to garden
products from March through October. No other type of sales
or storage shall be allowed.
10. Council may require removal of the canopy for additional
parking or to reduce parking demand if the Ee use changes.
11. A fence does not have to be constructed along the south lot line.
Second by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all.
b. Garage Rekoval Deadline
1. Councilmembeb Juker moved that the deadline for the garage rermoval
be September 30 �Q 99.
- - - -- -
Motion died for lack �f a second.
5 Attachment
MFM 0RANDUM
Endorsed. Action by Council:
ModiflecL__~____`
Rejected.,
Date,
'
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Budget Transfer — Clean—Up and Demolition Costs
DATE: June 14, 1989
At the May 22, 1989 Council meeting, the City authorized the clean up
of the debris from u demolished garage on a vacant lot at Sherren and
Hazelwood Avenues. The $1,100 cost of the clean up was approved to be
added to the property taxes.
On November 14, the Council authorized the demoli1tion of a burned house
at 1868 Furness Street. The-cost of this demolition,, $5,600, was also
to be added to the property taxeo.
In order to pay the bill for these two pro which have recently
been oompletedL a budget transfer of $6,700 is required.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a budget transfer of $6,700 from the contingency account to
pay for the clean up of the vacant lot at Sherreo and Hazelwood Avenues
and the house demolition at 1886 Furness Street,
'l
REQUESTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HRA TO APPLY FOR AND
IMPLEMENT A DEFERRED LOAN PROGRAM WITHIN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of
t City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly
called and held in the council chambers in said City on the
day of , 1989 at G)'/�`
L/ ~
The following members were present:
a-'Zel
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood desires to assist low-income
homeowners in making repairs to their homes for the purpose of
correcting defects affecting directly the safety, habitability,
energy conservation, or accessibility of the property; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has funds to
be used for such purposes, and will accept applications from
housing and redevelopment authorities desiring to administer
these Deferred Loan Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been duly organized
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, Section 473.123, and has all
of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, 473.193, under the
provisions of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act,
Minnesota Statutes 1976, Sections 462.411 and 462.711;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council
is hereby requested to include the City of Maplewood in an appli-
cation for state Deferred Loan Program funds, and that the
Community Development director is hereby authorized to enter into
any necessary agreement with the Metropolitan Council for
operating the Program within the City.
�A�d �on t
Seconded by
N 1 0 M 0 �*
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS.
)
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) '
%, undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed
Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that
I have carefully compared the attached and foresoing ektract of
minutes of a regular meeting of the City of MaoXewood,� held on
the day of , 198 , with the original on file in m.
c»ff ice v and the same is a full , true and complete transcript
insofar as the same relates to a conditional use permit.
Witness my hand a-s st-,tch Clerk and the corporate seal of the
City this day of , 19890
City �Clerk
Cit of Maplewood
[�
C', ��
Action by Counoi%�.
MEMORANDUM Endorsed___~__.~_
TO: City Manager Modif ied__~�____
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate planner Rejeoted~���~�-
SUBJECT: Housing Assistance Loan Program ' Dat
DATE: June 13, 1989
INTRODUCTION
In 1982, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing the
Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority (Metro HRA) to
apply for Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) funds to
participate in a home improvement program. This program provides
deferred payment loans to low-income home owners to make
livability improvements to their properties. Funds for Phase V
of this program have been appropriated by the State Legislature.
DISCUSSION
The Metro HRA administers the loan program in Ramsey County
communities. In order for the Metro HRA to apply for these funds,
they re reques ting that the attached resolution be adopted
authorizing Maplewpod's participation in the program, There are
fiveeligibility criteria which applicants must meet in order to
qualify for the program. Most notably, the improvements to the
property must be permanent while making the dwelling more safe,
habitable or energy efficient and may not exceed $9000. Since
September 1, 1985, 6 homeowners in Maplewood received a total
of $43,431 in loans in this program to improve their properties.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution
participation in the deferred
Housing Finance Agency.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
authorizing Maplewood's
loan program of the Minnesota
~ ^ c� __ 11-7
MEMORANDtJM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Renewal
LOCATION: 1201 Frgst Avenue
APPLICANT: Jonathon and Timothy Skon
OWNER: John Blake, Jr.
PROJECT TITLE: S and S Auto
DATE: June 12, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Endoroed___-�-�_
Modif iedL�_._~__
Rejeoted_~~~_~�~�'
Date
The applicants are requesting renewal of their conditional use permit
(CUP) for used car sales.
BACKGROUN '
On April 13, 1987, the City Council granted this CUP subject to
five conditions. This original approval required that the portion
of parking lot to be used for used car sales be paved.
Due to the applicant's dif+ir_u1tips in getting the parking lot
paved for car sales, the City Council , on July 11, 1988, revised
and renewed this CUP, subject to the following conditions:
1. No vehicle shall be displayed for sale until bituminous paving
and striping is provided for the vehicle sales area. After
paving is provided, no more than two automobiles shall be
di l aye d for sale at any one time that would be visible from
sp
Frost Avenue.
2. No more than four vehicles shall be offered for sale at any
time.
3. The Community Design Review Board shall approve the paving
and striping plan.
4. No cars shall be within fifteen feet of the right
unless the Community Design Review Board approves a parking
lot with a closer setback.
` 5. Vehicle parts are not to be stored outside.
DISCUSSION
Conditions have not changed regarding this use.
RECOMMENDAT
Ren of the conditional use permit for one year at 1201 Frost
Avenue to sell used cars, subject to the July 11, 1988 conditions
of approval.
TEMEMO2
Attachments
1. Location Map
28 Property Line/Zoning Map
�
I
•
0
P �- \ R PUD R
• R COUNT R a
AOAO F
R2 , .
• � ..
F R
R F
•� R •PUD a
LW .
• R
R • F MI R 2 U. FIOG1
� _ W
R F W F DEBT 14 • or M 1 R Vb Lj3C
R • ° az• R R •
Cr
• F SEXTAN Q Ll
MI r R z R
R • _ '^
R Y
• M I M I a w AV
F M1
TRWK *Al
• MI A VIFI
F M t-
Mt
R - r F . R R =
V c ® P LID t a
.A R BC
AD
(R2) o 1 L wE
QkJ AVE R3 AVE R J
CD
F
R2 R
.,.� •
Z • ,,,,,_ ,,,,• r 2) o E w000
W (R2 1
R �; '^ r• B �' R
F — F
Av / • v+ � Fit si cr AV
a F / R30 1...... r -
r F � �R °q L.Ft R R F� ►�
I
l o 591
W — R
a �t
3 lam , ' ' cc W
7ti(!I V 1
AVIE a It
F aK ' O � Q R z ; . F
j
LOCATI MAC
3 -
Attachment 1
u
r�
a ry of ST. PAID
lay) in
B
1.4
Park
co 0
I . wi
C3 a
41221
Is
1 i87
n
—, W e ire
4n
9 � '
Undeveloped Land
Z . Se scoo 0 5 54 CLr
2 ■
1E• ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■r
■
-7 3?,
in
in
PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP
Attachm
4
E /6
MEMORANDUM
- TO:
FROM:
`SUBJECTo
LOCATION:
DATE:
City Manager
Kenneth Roberts, Associate Planner
Tax For+eited Land
Gall Avenue and Lakewood Drive
June 19, 1989
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council:..
Endorsed
Modifled-�~�_��
Rejeoterl__�_~���
Dat e*
` Ramsey County has sent the City information on a parcel of land in
Section 1, Range 29, Township 22 which was forfeited to the State
of Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes. The City has
the option of formally acquiring the property, getting a use deed
' to us*0 it for a public purpose or allowing the l arid to be sold.
BACKGROUND
The Public Works Director, the Parks and Recreation Director, the
Comoounity Development Director and the Finance Director have had
��n opportunity to consider the possible future needs of the City
in this portion of Maplewood. They have determined that there
does appear to be a public pm ~pose for the parcel in question,
The property could be used for the storage of some of the extra
fill material from the construction of Playcrest park. This in
turn should help with sound abatement for the neighborhood to the
�south.
Due to the unique configuration of the property and its proximity
to the pipeline and power lines, it does not meet current City
oit and ards for single-family lots. This could present a problem
`for the City if it is purchased by an individual to try to
construct a home. Thus it appears to be in the public interest
to have City control of the land. Because of the opportunity to
inexpensively deposit some of the extra material from the park
construction and the difficulties new construction would face with
the site, staff is recommending that Maplewood get a use deed for
t he property in question.
For the City to start this process, the attached resolution must
be adopted by the City Council. The resolution authorizes the
proper City officials to make an application for the conveyance
of the parcel for public purposes.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the re of t..tt ion on page 4 to send to Ramsey County which
indicates that the City of Maplewood does want to use the
0•f ta.; forfeit l and in Section I., Range 29, Trawn sh•i a. ha 22 .
A •t~ t c h (Then •C: s
i Location Mal::)
2. e s* ca 1 L.t t i on authorizing conveyance t ca •t h e City
h:: r f o r f e i t
2
�.Z
1 `— 2636.35
r No Ace
�V
DRAINA E "M Q Q v E
— A tut C O I L
C I P L I I`
•
n
S. Z7 -� . 71 JZ7 ^
.ot /48.90 w 1 51.
oto 6 14L 40) 7334
11
� _ 6
We j . 2 3 4
�4
CA BREN NER A vE -�� ti �� E As1
107. &f. �j 1
1 tv Cot j L �Z
424 • s • S'� v. . i� z
2 �
O a
13 Q
L `�1 W 4 1
6A (4C _ s , (A --s") L Z
4 p j
�o
v � ►30 ~ r > w ►Sf
S
c ion
I LOCATION MAP
Q
N
3 Attachment 1
s it
100 ..
• IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
to '
�r
in '�
�`� 1 2.0
S
(
' / �•••p.
X6.0 ' ' R
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillilljllllI
r'r./t►
tie,
Arc
or
IA
12
n
13 `'
« ..+- �c..r � q �
� IS N
I �l
'
8G o
.
p act
3Sa� .
t!77,
4-. -p
^
0 ^
8
N
7 M
, P
A L
�0
:,L
ti�9� d
(i
010
1
�'�
..._ _ ..
-
--
- -- --
=
a�
T .o�
o
+o Rio ^
Go
_ -
PI -
+� �
SG.I ].
.... _ _ _
•L
�•
_
I
7�
�.. 4 r
•�� 7 ^L
AVE*
r '
ML
'�
i t
i �. !o w:. �,
,�;�
�- S7
_ (e s)
(8�) (e 7 )
v•
Ce)
4p o
(8 9)
o
(90)
,. J
� 9 J)
4
(9,�}•
�C � Oki � . � si
.rt
�9��
(► B)
o,
2
1 �` 0 3
4 5
N N
6 N
•7 �'
S
9
I I "' J -
IZ
DRAINA E "M Q Q v E
— A tut C O I L
C I P L I I`
•
n
S. Z7 -� . 71 JZ7 ^
.ot /48.90 w 1 51.
oto 6 14L 40) 7334
11
� _ 6
We j . 2 3 4
�4
CA BREN NER A vE -�� ti �� E As1
107. &f. �j 1
1 tv Cot j L �Z
424 • s • S'� v. . i� z
2 �
O a
13 Q
L `�1 W 4 1
6A (4C _ s , (A --s") L Z
4 p j
�o
v � ►30 ~ r > w ►Sf
S
c ion
I LOCATION MAP
Q
N
3 Attachment 1
`
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County
by resolution dated April 13, 1989, classified as nonconservation
'land,certain land lying within the limits of the City of
Maplewood; and
'
' WHEREAS, a copy of the classification resolution together
with a list of the land classified has been submitted for
ap of the classification in accordance with Minnesota
'Statutes Annotated, Section 282.01, sub. 1; and '
WHEREA8, the land is described as follows:
_ Unplatted lands - Section 01, Township 29, Range 22.,
That Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter
in Section One, described as follows: Beginning at the
Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter; thence North on the East line 1,103-69/100 feet;
' thence West parallel with the North line of said Northwest
Quarter 170 feet; thence South parallel with said East line
of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the
South line thereof; thence East on said South line to the
_ point of be�inning; except the North 217 feet of the West
150 feet thereof. PIN 01-29-22-22-0020.
WHEREAS, the City of M��plewood has determined that said land
is required for public purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said classification of
the land shown on said list as nonconservation land is hereby
approved U and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be
and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance
c�f said tax-forfeited land for public purposes; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is
authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and
appl for conveyance of said tax-forfeited land in the
Office of the Land Commissioner,,
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) `
Clerk of the City of Maplewood, do
hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a
resolution passed by the Council of the City of Maplewood at its
meeting held on the day of June, 1989.
'
City Clerk
SEAL
4 Attachment 2
4
Agenda Number F - /.
.Action by Council:,
Endorsed-. - ..
AGENDA REPORT Modified_,_,_.
Rej e ct e d..______
Date
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director lq9t-&
RE: QUOTES ON PROPERTY, LIABILITY, AND WORKERS
COMPENSATION INSURANCE
DATE: June 20,1989
Proposals were received from two insurance agencies for property
and liability coverages. Also, a proposal was received from the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for workers
compensation coverage. The City's present insurance policies
expire June 30, 19890
On April 6th, the City Council assigned markets to the Ekblad,
Pardee, Bewell Agency and to Hadtrath and Associates. Both of
these agencies submitted proposals for property and liability
insurance coverages. Our insurance consultant, Sue Bennett,
Corporate Risk Managers, Inc., has analyzed these proposals and
will present her report (copy attached) at the Council meeting.
DFF: kaz
1 06/19/89 15:08 2t 6129379308 CORPORATE RISK 02
Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. in-
7595) mitchell road • sui(a 109 • odors praidea, minnesota 55344 a ( 612 ) 937-8942 4Ab==MffAW
June 19, 1989
Mr. Daniel Faust
Finance Director
Cit of Maplewood
1.830 E. Count Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Jul 1 1989-90 Propert Insurance Renewal
Dear Dan:
The attached summar incorporates the the proposals received from Ekb1ad, Pardee &
Bewell, Inc. and Hadtrat-h & Associates, Tnc., and indicates current costs and
covera for comparative purposes.
As a result of the a q uestionnaires, Ekblad., Pardee & Sewell, Inc. were
to q uote the PENCO pro and Hadtrath & Associates were allowed the LICIT
pro due to the a competitive fee structure.
As we briefl discussed a couple of weeks a PENCO declined to offer a
proposal after intiall re underwritin data. PENCO 'indicated an
insufficient amount of time to underwrite as the reason for their
declination. Ekb1ad, Pardee & Bewell, however, did offer a q uote on the
Cit ' S public emplo bond covera and boiler covera The bond q uote
offered throu Auto Owner, however, 1.4; not q uite as competitive. as the. bond
renewal with United Piro. & Casualt Four variouq alternatAves were offered
with re to the boiler covera Quotos were received from the incumbent
carr-ler, Hartford and an alternative causer`, Western National. Quotes were
g iven on both a $500 deductible and $1,000 deductible, When compared to all
proposals offered, the boiler covera with Hartford at the current $500
deductible appears to be most competitive.
Hadtrath & Associates offered an alternative. to tf)c compl.ctc LICIT pro b
c)fferin a. q uote from USF & G on the inland marine and bollfa,.r covera The
inland marine covera would include EDP covera valuable papers, contractor's
e miscellaneous ei votin mar-"hines, 1 a enforcement bailee,
mechanics' tools, arse fine arts floater r-overa The deductible with USF & G
on these covera then would be $1,000. Currentl and with-the LM 1T renewal,
thoRe covera are includod in -the all lines annual a deductible of
$25,000/occurrent, $50,000 annual a The premium cost difference to
06/19/89 15:09 X 6 12 937 9308 CORPORATE RISK 03
Mr. Daniel Faust
June 19, 1989
Pa 2
C q
accept the inland mar Ine covera with USF & G as oppo sed to the. LM IT i , a
savin of $669, WiLh the. acceptance of the LMCIT/usr & G pro the 1989-90
total premium Includin the bond .and boiler covera i.q.; $1,900 less than the
premium paid for these covera last y ear,
Tho LWIT's workers' compensation estimated deposit- premilum has also decreased
this y ear b $25,048. Althou the estl.mated pa fi used for ratin
purposes increased this y ear, the overall rate decrease alon with the
improvement of the experience modificiiLion factor, resulted -in a substantial
decrease,
The attached workers' compensation loss data for past y ears g ives an indication
of the potential savin remainin with the retro pro Takin an avera
lo-ss y ear based upon the past five y ears, ILhere romains a potential cost
savin with the r option of approximatel $22,103.
As we briefl discussed, Dan, the y ears 1986-87 and 1984-85, to date, have been
I- h P wn rs f qR f nr Aca to. f al clukimg cosatia. The total cl..-Amc cost for tho y ear
1986-87 as of 5/1/89 has j umped from $65,393 a s of 3/1/88 to $139,939. There
is a back claim involvin a Gerald Owen which remains open with a substantial
reserve placed upon it.
The overall outcome of acceptin the LM 17 renowal as currentl written with
the exception of writin the inland marine with U & G, boil..cr covera a
with Hartford, and the retro plan wi.th the LMCIT is a total 1989-90 decrease. in
premium of $26,948.
Please let me know if y ou have an q uestloties or it I can be of further assistance,
I will be present at y our June 22 Council meetin at 4:30 P.M.
Sj ncerel
CORPORATE MANAGER St INC.
S I Is Dieken Ben tt ARM CPCU
Rii Mana
DB/
Enclosures
06/19/89 15!09 2 61 29379308 CORPORATE RISK 04
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
July 1, 1989-90 Workers' Compensation Renewal.
Ratro Option: Minimum - 43,573
Maximum - $165
Total Paid Losses
1988 - 1989 7 (7/1 - 5/1 estimated plus 25 additional for 1 NR)
1987 - 1988 $,10
1986 - 1987 $1399939
1985 1986 25 061
1984 1985 84,117
Based upon an estimated average of $53,468 losses paid in the year 1989-90,
the City of aplewood could save approximately $22,105 from the standard
premium of $124,493.
v 06/19/89 15110 6 1 2937930E CORPORATE R I S K 05
C overa g e Current Cu
current T
T""wmial & `� - - - -w
Pt open tY #
20, 749
Limit: $11,413,382
Blanket B14./Contents/RIO
All Fisk, Replacement Cost
Dedut t 1 bl e; $25, 040i0ccur.
��0,000�Aggreg�
cokp afar b LME I T
Et�P� Egu i gment 1Ne a
1
L i m i t s : $296,845
$ 1,000 Media
# 10,000 Extra Expo
Deductible: All Lines A19.
Company: LMLIT
Valgable_Rae
34
Limit: $30, 000 City Hal
beduct All Linea Agg.
Coap a n y i LNG I T
Inland Marine
HPI i4V F. ii 9. am A— d. "
Limit: 4573,962 Conti Equip4
2
$474,054 Misc. Equip.
4,B53
09 !toting Mach.
Incl.
t 7 LE Babes
Incl®
4 10,000 Herb. Tools
Incl.
S 20,000 Fine Arts
lncl6
De All Linen Aggi
Company: LKIT
Crimpm Bene Liability
99,745
Limit: $600,000 B1, P4 $c
Per sonal Injury
Deductible: All Line& Agg.
Caspany; LMCIT
N aims "80
C9!2 - r .hei %iye
34,466
Limit: $600,000 CEL 811PD
$600,000 UNIUIM
All Li nes Agg. Iced, C011P.
411 L anes Agg. Bsdw ,roil.
Company: WIT
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
&V _1 1 _!2@2 : 90 _ PROPERTY/CASUALTY RENEWAL
--wwM MM ="r. -- ' . T r =rrr
Ekblad, Pa rdee LK11 Ha.dtrath & Assoc. Hidtra & a550c.
Bevel l , Inc. Wo rk, Camp. LAIC I T LK I T/08F & 6
New L im it s 1909 - ! 990 1989 - 1990 1989 w 1990 1909 _ 1 990
N o gQote Offered 19,622 4 19,622
$11,750 a 90% LMCIT
305,973
Incl. in Intl,
Inland Marine UBE & 6
Premium $1 ,000 Oed.
Incl. Incl.
OSF & O
$1,000 Oed.
604,740
503,724
7 1 441 6
USF � 5
$1,000 Oedf
104,631 104,631
LMC
30 30,699
Y 1 1 T
pa
06/19/89 15:10
2 6129379308 CORPORATE RISK
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
J0LY_1 PROPERTY/CASUALTY RENEWAL
06
Ekblad, Pardee
MIT
Hadtrath & AssoE.
Hadtrath & Asso[
Covera Current Ca 5t
Bevoll, Inc.
Work. Camp.
LICIT
LNCIT/USF & 6
C�E n _ 1� /L i�ri lisp - M9
New Limits 1789 - 1770
66 aum ft us&&
19B9 1970
Public Officiali Liib,
6
6
L i m i t $600,000
LNUT
Deduct: All Lines A
Retro Date; 7/1/81
Compan LOCIT
Claims Made
CiaSS !8
17
17
Covera at Nature Ctr,
LKIT
Compan LNCIT
Boftd 1
2,140
1,847
1
Faithful Perforeance
lAuto Owners)
Blanket Position Bond
Limit: $50,000 All Empl.
Compan United Fire i Case
SUB-TOTAL #171,476
t 2,140
- — — — — —
-- - - - - -T
4171,203
M AS Am A6 —
$170,534
Boi er l M chi
M W. ft M MKMAne .U__r
t 5
6
Llait; $500
(Hartford)
(USF & 6)
(USF t 5)
Direct Dama
451060 v/S1,000 Ded.)
3500 Did,)
$ 1,000 Water Damp
S 1,000 Ammonia Con tiall
5 Expeditin E
5
25,000 Extra Expense
(Western National)
Deductible: $500
1$5,170 w/$1 Dad d)
Compan Hartford
Umbrella Liabilit y Currentl d ry
No Quote Off ered
Quote not y et available
Limit; 41 not Eirr
1 10,400 SIR
Workers' Com 149,541
41 4,49
124,493
124,493
Limitt, Statutor Retro Option
Retra Option
Experiende Mod, - 97 52t339 Min,
Exp. hod. 191
43,573 Min.
Compan LNCIT 1?9 Max.
165,654 MAxv
TOTALS $327,400
4 7
4124,493
4295,696
$301,410
Included lo Total
Agenda Age a u
Action by Council,
AGENDA REPORT
En d e r s e d ..�.,._...�..�..
Mo difi e d.,._,
Rej ecte d,.
TO: Mayor and City Council Dat
FROM: City Manager
Y er
g
RE: UPDATE ON CITY HALL PLANS AND ARCHITECTURAL CONTRACT
DATE: June 19, 1989
Dean Johnson and Lisa Ross of T.K.D.A. will be present at the next
Council meeting to update the City Council on the status of the
plans for the addition to City Hall and to review the revised
contract for architectural services.
No action is required on the plans, however, Council approval of
the updated contract for architectural services is recommended.
A copy of a time schedule, a memo regarding the April 20, 1989,
discussion on the City Hall plans, and a memo from Ken Haider
dealing with the contact, are attached for your information.
MAM :kaz
Attachments
M
V
TKDA
..P ..
T.OLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
p �6[Eod
MAY - 4 1989 �
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
14EhDRMDIJM
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -1893
612/292 -4400
FAX 612/292 -0083
To : a R ®f er a nce : Ma I ,ew, �� H a I ,1._.. -ulre
Copt es To G .a i I B I ackatme ...r_..............
from:
Date:
Revised May 1, 1989
Commission No. 9424_.__..._ „�,�.,_,_,_.,..,
On Thursday, Apr I 1 20, 1989, Dean Johnson and I presented the Prel Iminary
Design package to the Maplewood City Council and staff. At that time, TKDA
was author tz ed by the Council to proceed w ith design development and
construction documents for the CITY HALL EXPANSION, RECONFIGURATION AND
I MPROV EMENTS. The f ul I preliminary design package estimated by TKDA at
approximately $700,000 was presented and approved Including:
A. Enlargement of the Council Chambers as Indicated on the preliminary
floor plan.
B. Enlargement of the new basement section to approximatel 1700 sq, ft.
The general discussion w ith Council and staff was quite extensive. It Is our
understanding that action Is to be taken on the f o l l o w i n g Items. PI ease
adv I se us of any add I t I ons or rev I st ons th at shou I d be made to th I s I I st.
1 . Prov Ide Counct I w Ith a cost for replacing glass and al uminum "exit
� ^! a ! f1 do oms f rcm the south and west st des of the bu I I d ng w Ith f I ush
insulated steel doors.
2. Provide a door at the corridor adjacent to the receptionist to secure
the new passageway.
3. Determine the most cost- effective method of providing security at the
two clerk storage rooms. Investigate concrete block reinforcement
vs. alarm system.
4. Minimize the visual impact as practical for the proposed gable end
air intake louver (west elevation).
5. Match existing exterior brick and other materials.
6. Review audio-visual requirements of Council Chambers and consider
podium usage from both sides,
i
Memo -Mike McGuire .
April 21, 1989 (Rev. May 1, 1989 )
Pa ge 2
7. Address dais platform configuration and sight lines of the seated
p ub I i c. Layout seating to determine Increase from existing,
8. Consider visually "opening -up" reception area (possibly with use of
glass a t ends of counter) while minimizing visual clutter. Security
must be maintained.
9. The aoousti cs of the Counci l Chambers Tema i ns a . concern and w i I I be
addressed in greater detail at the next presentation to the Counci I.
10. ov e r a l l se c ur i ty w i th In the f a c i l f ty i s a concern as w e i 1, of ter -
hours access.
11. Consider the Installation of a bottled water dispenser rather' than an
Ew C.
12. Provide Council with views of the Council Chamber from within and
from the lobby. Drawings may be elevations or perspective sketches.
TKDA was also directed to coordinate the design of audio - visual system in the
Counc i I Chambers,
The City Manager Is concerned regarding the schedule,, TKDA Is to prov ide the
City Manager with a revised schedule.
The Council approved work scope Is broader than initially contracted for with
TKDA, and It shout d be rev i ew .ed w i th the jCJty Manager.
LR/DJ :dh
PROJECT SCHEDULE MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL EXPANSION
1988 1989
DEC 1990
JAN. FE6. MARCH APFUL m" JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. MAFICH
STUDY
PRELIMINARY
DESIGN
DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PRINTING
BIDDiNG
REVIEW & AWARD
CONSTRUCTION
C44
tu
R I
0
I -,
c
U3
%w
00
tzj
D
0
D
Lo
0
C-)
4 15>1
cli
�
REVISED 6/9199
R)
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
ti -TKDA A/E Supplemental �UBJECT: City Hall A�di on- Agreement 1
J0ATE June 19, 1989
On April 20,1989 the city council approved Schematic Design 2
along with other building changes not anticipated in the original
scope o+ services~ Since the scope of services has changed, TKDA
_ has requested a change in the A/E contract.
The proposed fee changes`are in the design and construction
documents phase and the bidding and construction services phase
of the project. The original scope of services envisioned about
$400,000 building program~ The cost estimate now is $735
The increased fee requested is based on the new estimatefor the
. schematic design approved by the cit. council. That portion of
the fee for parts of the building that did not change from the
original scope remain the same.
Approval of the A/E supplemental agreement is recommended.
KGH
jc
JUN 1 5 1984''
T.OLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
KD AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 5510 1 BUILDING
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS 612/292 -4400
FAX 612/292 -0083
June 14, 1989
city of Maplewood
1830 East county Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Attention: Mr. Kenneth G. Haider
Director of Public Works /Engineeri
' , ng
Re: l � meal t No. 1 (dated June 13, 1989 )
City Hall l an and Remodeling
T DA Coacmonission No. 9424
Dear Mr. Haider:
f ind enclosed - - =,; ,�., ,,,,a a i a + +�v, s ++
Please herewith for Y� �� �=� pp . �., �....� _ -
supplemental t (SA) No. 1 per our meeting of June 13, 1989. As
�p ++ ond" the Schematic Design Phase have been
dsscussed, only TIA services bey
adjusted to reflect the increase in work scope.
services to the date of April 17 , 1989 (0 date of Schematic
All serve
i t .and reviewal with staff) were acc� i
lfished n accordance
Des gn
Wl �
w ith our initial Agr e ement dated 27 19 8 9 . At that tine, the work
.
scope did a as authorized by council action on Ap ril 19, 1989 Zhis
revised SA one reflects a revis ion to scope after the Schematic Design*
Y
The estimated fee for nM services frar i Schematic Design gh
Construction as identified by SA No. 1 breaks dawn as follows:
Estimated
proposea
Initial
Increase based
Contract Amount
A
on Change in
(per SA No. 1
March 27 1989
Work Scope
dated June 13, 1989)
Des i and
$35,000
$27,700
$62
Construction
Documents
Bidd' and
8
6
14,700
Construction Phase
Services
Total
$43,000
$34,400
$77,400
Mr. Kenneth G. Haider
City of Maplewood
June 14, 1989
Page 2
?his "pr o d amount reflects a $1.,595 reduction frown our
initial SA. (dated. nl 20,. x.989) ` Tais reduction is for design fee which
is associat. nth tie: A
e Design and previsly included on the SA,
we hcpe this meets with your approval and if there are any questions,
please give us a call.
sincerely,
. , AIA
Project / tact
DAJ: mr
oc: Mr. Mich MoC^e
Mr:. Wes Hickson, T��A
Mr. Jim Voyen, TEA
Encl.
S Agreement No. 1
Date of Supplemental. t: June 13 1989
Contract for: Architectural and Engineering Services for the Rrject
entitled: City Hall Exransion, Reconfiguration and
Improvements
Date of Initial Contract: March 27, 1989
Consultant: Toltz, Kinc,�,, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Incorporated
This Supplemental Agreement provides for a revision to the above referenced
contract, all as hereinafter described, and unless otherwise provided herein
�1 be subject to all of the contract covenants and stipulations.
..,,.
The purpose of this Supplemental Agreement is to revise the Work Scope
and Coupensation to reflect requested changes in the Project Scope as
approved by the City Council on April 2 0 , 1989 and as attached
herewith as BIT A (yEF!rDM1ARY DESIGN SCOPE AND ESTIMATE), The
estimated construction cost as identified by nM' s Prel iminazY Design
(P,.D.) Gau u* ttal and. approved by the Council on April 20, 19 8 9 is
$735,000. (Included is a $40,000 allowance for A/V equip Tent not
referenced by the P.D. 10 )
2. ARTICLE II - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TIBIA
Revise Article II, Design Devel Phase of the initial Agreement
to base the scope of work on the expanded and approved PRELIMINARY
DESIGN subimittal and construction cost estimate. Also include design
of the audio visual system for the Council Chambers within the
approved $ budget ally ance. Revise Article II as follows:
Revise Item B, Design Deve 1 opment Phase, to read "Based on the
approved MAINAM DESIGN submittal, prepare Design Deve 1 opment
Docunen
Revise Item C. 2 . d to read "Electrical Construction (including A/V
equip 110
Revise Item D.2 to read "A total of 175 hours is assigned to site
observation; an average of approximately 7 hours per week over a
25 week period. 11
SA1 -1
30 AIMCLE III - ADDITIONAL S CES
Revise Additional Services as follows:
Delete Item A "Specialty Designs for Acoustic and Video
C 'cations, etcs may regAre outside consultants." (This will
be provided for under the Basic Services .
Revise Item C to read ":..Observation services exceeding 175
LIM
40 ARTICLE V � COMPENSATION
i.se the, compensation of the initial Agreement to increase the
Rev I� •
n Densat "ion for the in work scope.
Revise Item 1 regarding basic services, Tasks A through C, to
increase the estimated not to exceed fee from It $ 3 5 , 0 0 0" to read
11 $62 1 700" o
Revise I tem 2 re gardiM In and Construction phase to increase
�
the estimated not to exceed fee amount from 11 $8,00 0 11 to read
"$14,700 ".
Revise Item! 3 regarding period of service fran ".. twelve (12)
consecutive: - months • • • " to read " ... fourteen (14) consecutive
Tomz KENG, DUVALL, ANDERSON
l
e T. Prew, P.E.
Pies' dent
M�.chael A. McGuire
Dan A. Join, AIA
Ci � er Project Manager
tY g
SA1 -2
_ EXHIB A
SA #1
PR E .1 M.I NARY
Map 1 ew ood Ci Hal I Expansion
TKDA Commission No. 9424
April 17, 1989
The f ol.low i ng work scope descr i pt i on i s based on the PR IMINARY DES IGN
CRAW I NGS P-1 a and P -1 b dated 4/17/89, A reduced copy of these drawings are
Include for ref erence. The work has been itemized into f ive categories:
1) building addition, 2) off ice reconf iguration, 3) counci I chamber
mods f Icati ons, 4 ) other b u i l d i n g Improvements and 5) site/parking lot
Improvements.
TEN
To meet current and projected space needs, a 4,770 square foot
but l di ng addl ti on i s proposed for the west end of the f aci I ity. An
employee entrance would be created immediately west of the Council
Chamber for da i 1 y work hour use as Orel I as potent i al for "af ter hour
use" allowing access to a limited and secured area. This expansion
wool d create an enc:i osed exterior court prov idi ng natural I fight and
ventil to inner occupied spaces as well as to satisfy mechanical
vent i I atl on r eq u i reme nt s.
A. Arch i to �r,a1
The addition would be designed to match the architecture of the
a _ exi. sti ng faci 1 ity as a si ngI e- story structure w * 1 th a gab i e
}
styled metal roof system. Co n struct i on mater i al s woui d match
those currently in place to provide for c o m p a t i b i l i t y of
- - - -- -
building systems and image. Windows would be positioned to
provide natural I ight to al I of f, ices and yet be compl imentary to
the existing b u i l d i n g ' s image. A basement w 11 I be prov i de d as
- - - - - - -- - an extensi on to th e exi st i ng for hoes i ng mech an i ca I eq u i pment.
A 1 ,7 00 square f oot basement i s proposed w i th an o pt i on to add
another 900 square feet (refer to the Cost Estimate). Refer to
PI an Draw i ng P -1 a f or I ayout and funct i on and al so P -1 for
bu i I di ng excavati on
8• anicaL
HVAC. Prov ide a new ai r handi ng un i t to serve the new bu i I di ng
addi ti on. Cool i ng w i I I be accomp1 1 shed by a new a r cool ed
condensing unit located next to the exi sting one east of the
f ac i I i ty. . Heat i ng w i 1 I be w i th hot w ator f rom th e exi st i ng hot
water heati ng system. Hum idi f icati on w i I I be accompl i sh ed by a
steam h um i d i f i er.
Exh aust_Fan5 w i I I be prov i de d f or th e new . toi I ets, Coun c i I
Off ice and one Conference Roan. The toilet exhaust fan w i 1 I be
interconnected with the i ights. The Counci I of f ice and
Conf erence Room exhaust f ans w i I I be control I ed by an adj ustabl e
timer switch.
- I - 9424
p i u b i 9 New p l u m b i n g and p 1 urn b i n g f i xt ur e s will be provided
as required. i red. water for these new f i xt ur es w i I I be s u p p 1 i e d by
the existing water er service. A new hot w ater h eater w i I I be
provided ided to meet the hot water needs of these new fixtures.
Waste f r om these new f i xt u r e s w I l l be run to a new sewage
ejector • to be located i n the new basement addition, T h i s
e J . ector w i I I th en p um p w ante to th e exi st i ng sy stem. FI oor
drains In the new basement addition w i 1 I be piped to the sump
located In the existing basement ,%
Fi re :rote • on , The exi sting wet s p r i n k l e r f ire protection
system w
i f t be extended to cover the new addi ti on. it is
assumed that the exi sting water service into the b u i l d i n g has
sufficient f l o w and pressure required for proper system
operati on.
Storm S e w e r. Two catch ba s i n s w 11 1 be i n st a i l e d i n the new
co u� t y a d f or W ater runof f. These catch ba s i n s w i I 1 be p i pe d
to the t cot area to the v est of the new add i ti o
GO El ectr i ca t
Ser ice a L d_a 5tE I bu.t1gp • The exi st i ng e I ect r I c sery ice 1 s
taken underground at 120/208 volts 3 phase 4 wire from a 300kv a
uti I it Y owned, pad - mounted transformer I ocated to the east of
the building. The main switchboard is a fusible switch type
w ith 1200 ampere mai ns and two mat n sw itches rated at 400 and
amperes. The 400 amp ere main feeds air conditioning
80 0 P
equipment while the other supplies the switchboard distribution
sect i ons.
One of th e di str I but i on sw i tch es co nnect s to th a normal s i de of
an automati c transf er sw I tch w h i l e th a emerge ncy s t de of th e
sw Itch i s powered by a 7 5kw rated a ngi ne generator set.
Emergency po w I s di str i buted throughout the f ac t ity to 3
9e
-- - -
emergency power c i r c u i t breaker panel s.
High demand on the service has been recorded a t 17 0kw which i s
i
about half of the system capacity. The bu I di ng addi ti on
contempt ate d under th i s prof ect w i I I not r eq u i re el e ct r i c
sery ice upgrading.
L i hti n . General lighting of the existing spaces is provided
by use of 2 x 4 3-lamp f I uorescent deep ce 1 1 parabol is troffers
w i th energy -ef f ici ent I amps and ba I I ast s. The system 'is
property designed and in good working order. We w i I 1 provide
more of the same In the new addition.
_2_ 9.24
Power_ and _commun i cations 120 volt convenience outlets w i l I be
di str i buted th roughout th a new ad I ti on w i th adeq ua to . br anch
circuit design to avoid circuit breaker operation under normal
conditions of use.
The City owns it telephone equipment consi sting' of a Memorz
Te I ex PBX sw ! tch an d a sm a I i key sy st em w h ! ch m ov e d w i th th e
Po 1 ice Department three years ago. There are a number of d i rect
USwest I i nes for speci f is uses i ncl udi ng various computer modems
and 911 sery ice. Systems are I n good order. We w 11 1 adjust and
extend the telephone systems as necessary to accommodate the new
addition: and remodel i ng.
2. O FFICE RECON U RAT 1QN
To better sati sfy the spaci al and f uncti onal requi remonts of the ci ty
of f ices, a p proxi mate i y ,000 sq ua4 re f ee t of exi st i ng of f i ce space w 11 1
undergo some adaptive reuse and /or reconf figuration. This work also
I ncl udes a new recept i on area at the mai n I obby and mod i f i cat i ons to
the passage south of the Counci I Chambers which also serves as access
to the new l y formed courtyard. Along with this remodel i n g, the
mechani cal,, el ectr i cal and f Ire protection systems w i I I be modi f ied
to accommodate the new layout and functions. The areas of this work
is shown as shaded on Drawing P- 1 b.
A. Arch i tect r- -al
The reconfigured spaces will be designed and constructed of
si m i I ar mater i al s as the exi st i ng. Part! ti ons w i I 1 be r emov ed,
new doors and service counters provided as required to serve the
new activ ifles. Where partitions are removed or added, areas
-- may receive new floor f i n i sh and ce i l i ng material as required.
Al I new m a t e r i a l s w i l l be f i n i sh e d to match exi sting .
Fire-resistive construction wil I be uti l !zed where required by
Code to maintain separation at the proposed Engineering.
counter, as wel I as at the existing passage f ran the courtyard.
B. Me an i cat
HV AC. Remove, relocate and /or instal 1 new hot water piping,
ductwork, di f fusers, gr i I 1 es and YAV boxes as req u i red to meet
the HVAC needs of the new space conf igurati on. Existing piping
ductwork, diffusers, grilles and YAV boxes w i l l be reused
wherever possible. Provide additional or redistributed HVAC for
the equipment loads in the Print Room and other equipment areas.
F i re_Protection. Relocate and /or add sprinkler heads as
required to prov i de adequate f ire protection for the new of f i ce
conf figuration.
-3- 9424
Co F_ l ectri ca I
Power an dCoM m_Uill.�a Modify the existing e l e c t r i c a l
service distribution to accommodate the new layout. Al so
provide service to equipment which w i 1 I be located In specified
areas such as the Print and, Copy Rooms. The communication
sy st ern w i 1 1 be mo d i f led a s r eq u i red..
L i ohting Rev Ise the exi st i ng i i gh ti ng and prov fide new where
requ red to serve the reconf figured spaces.
The Council Chamber improvements are grouped into .two basic categories
as ref 1 ected by th e co st e st i mate, one 'I's m i sce I 1 aneous i m prov eme nt s
to the Ch ambers such as dal s desk, acoustical treatment, addition of a
Me d i a Roan, etc. Th second Is an expansion of the Chambers. Ref er
to Drawing P-i a for proposed layout and P -2 for Image section through
Chambers.
A. Arch i tect u
MJ sce I I aneous 1 r oy em en s, Included i s the construction of a
Media Director's Room in the southeast corner of the Council
Chambers. This roan would be accessible from the corridor and
- provide a control and storage location for audio visual
equipment associated with the Council Chambers. To improve the
acoustics, a sound - absorbing wal I covering is considered for the
side wal Is, as wet I as an acoustical spray -on texture for the
1 ow er ce i I i ng areas where sound reverberati on i s a probi em. An
I denti f icati on and v i sua l focal poi nt to the Counci i Chambers i s
proposed on the center wal I behind the Council dais desk, A
cons! derati on may be a scut ptured "mapl e I eaf " of wood or metal ,
as shown on Dr P -20
The Counci I dais desk is proposed to be expanded or redone to
provide additional seating. Th i s woul d i nvol ve modi f i ng the
pl atform and providing 4 - o d d i t i o na l microphones. The v e r t i c a l
prof He of the dais desk would be reduced from the existing
height to improve visual contact and communications with the
publ i c during meetings. A pod! um woul d be prov i ded f or the use
of guest speakers.
Expansion. The exi sting area wal i of the Counci I Chambers
(adjoining the lobby) would be removed and the Chambers extended
out about 7 feet to the edge of the existing entrance vesti buI e.
The addi ti ona l area woul d have the I ow er ce i I i ng to match the
existing. New w i ndow s woul d be added ! n the parti ti on 'to
maximize exposure al lowed by Code to the 1 obby space. The upper
porti on of wal I w i th the exi st i ng gi azed openi ng woul d remai n.
If the expansion i s not accepted, gl azed openings w i l l be added
in the existing lobby wal l .
- q - 9424
Be Mew an I ca �
Mod i fy the exi st i ng duct to i mprov e al r di str i but i on to the
expanded space. Add f ire protection sprinkler heads to the area
of new ceiling. Provide HV AC and f ire protection to the new
Media Room.
C. E ectr i c
Add I i ghtl ng I n th a expa n de d ce 11 1 ng a rea to m atch ex i st i ng an d
extend the sound system to Include this area.: Add audiovisual
systems for the new Me Room as r for th activity.
Prov I de rough- I n f or audi o/v i sua I sy stems, Al 1 A- V eq u i pment to
be f urn i shed by owner.
01HER BUILDING iMFRoyEWN
Several areas of concern have been r a i se d r ega r d i ng exi st i ng b u i I di ng
system In oth parts o the b u i l d i n g not being addressed in the
"expan sion" or "r - eoo n f i g u r ati on" -w I ssues addressed by t h i s mechanical
and e l e c t r i c a l w or k scope are Incl uded i n the construction cost
estimate, The need for an un i nterrup►t i b l e power source (UPS) is
a ddr esse'd separately In soo pe and cost.
A. Medan I ca 1
le, Provide baseboard radiation under exterior windows in
Po I i ce Rece pt i on and :Fli na nce a revs to a I I ev i ate co l d s pots
ex per i enced dur i ng i nter month s.
2, Provide h u m i d i f i c a t i o n to a l l e v i a t e static e l e c t r i c i t y and
dry air during winter months. This humidification would
be provided by a steam hum i d i f ter s u p p l i e d by a steam
boiler located i n the basement mechanical room.
-- --
3. Due to short circuiting of return air in the Clerical
Area, it i 's proposed that the two I arge return a i r gr i i I es
IV the wal Is be removed. Return air ductwork woui d then
:
instal led above the corridor ce i I i ng to transfer air
f rom the ce i I i ng return al r pl enum to the return a i r
chase. A duct fan may be required to accompl i sh this,
4. Prov i de heati ng and /or cool I ng to Pol ice Di spatch and f if e
rooms". Th i s woui d be accompI i sh e by rep I ac 1 ng t e
existing v AV boxes and ductwork with larger ones and /or
instal I ing an i ndiv +dual air condi ti oni ng unit. Further
investigation w i I I identify which approach would be most
a ppropr i ate.
a
-5- 9424
B.
E l ectr I
The needed electrical improvements identified by building staf f
to date are:
There are a number of areas (6 to 8) within the building
where octopus' dev ices are i n use to create pi aces to
plug In cord connected equipment. It i s thought that
electrical capacity Is adequate in that circuit breakers
are not tripping, but that there needs to be more
receptacles provided. Breaker tr i ppi ng has occurred due
4 ' to use of personal el ectr i ca l heaters. This Is recognized
as an unusual condition and not an electrical system
def
2* Some existing c i rcu i t breaker panel s are f u 1 1; I.e. , there
is no convenient way to add circuits, should some be
req u i red. We _have estimated the cost of adding one new
f
panel to an existing feeder.
51 TELPARK I NG J MMOYEEEN
Provide additional parking for approximately 20 pubs is vehicles on the
west end of the existing parking lot, Included i n this 20 would be
approximately 7 sta l Is which w ou l d be 1 oca to d i n f r+ont of the
bu.i i di ng, just north of the Counci I Chambers, in I ine w Ith exi sti ng
parking,
Also proposed is the expansion of the securi fencing on the south
end of the Publ is Saf ety sect i on to prov i de f or an addi ti ona l 6.
stalls,
-� - 9424
�• Q Y DES
> ♦ W ewc,05 C_- off ices
♦
CVs:: ;:
.� r • But t din Expa n s I on 4,7 -
Add Alternate for additional
800 s. f. of basement
2. Reoonf i9ur ati on of 8,000 s. f..
i of ex i sting off ice spa
3. CounclI Chambers
a. General Improv
b. Expansion
4e Other But 1 ding Improvements
a. .Pechani cal
b. Electrical
$450,000
25,000
100,000
27,000
1 8,000
40,000
14,000
5. S ite /Parks € *NF improvements
f ,
todd 20 pubs is and 6 secured sta _ . 20.QOO
TOTAL $694
Use $6
95 000
,
t 7 : ORNATE M t �
: A need has been I dente f ted fcr an Uni nterrupti bl a Power Source t UPS
' o e ons to prov 1de more backup power for the system
. .fo r comp P
.
- . while the emerge n • Ifnnn nower outages or
w nenev er the automatic tr an sf er sw itch is exe rc i se d, computers
connected,.to emergency power circuits lose on- 1 i ne vol ate l e memory.
_Th_is_._c_an be averted y b use of un i nterrupt i bl a power supply (UPS)
.
eq The est s mate is for a 3 Okv a, 3 phase rotary type UPS
- . - -• sy stem. - - --
Such a UPS sy st ern could be expected to cost upward of $60,0000
-7- 9424
(D--
Y
Y
4 F�
i
1
1
�-- I TYT
1Z
I
•..��rr�rr.
� GOIJNfiI �.
GN�lHBER�
i
J
1� � M
C
4
1
a
a
i
o-
!
4
I
M�gtN
CITY HALL PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN .�...e „
c :•w+s 1KCO�lGN�a1�o ai/o a.awo t�c+RS RECONFIGURATION P-18
• 4CAMT7T Dann • ...f.rr-you Mlr►watjiloc
O t� C1 4 Q O Q
L ff
r �s�� , .f w ►� CR ►� wM / Ar .11r • y �`!► iwf p�r�
�.... I iw.A ti v� i & �O► R a►+T. rQ III?
,Mo•s�oca• •4zr•�oti as
eras ,.� •e_.r.� "��hCrS R/��E s..►+ w/� w+typt.
1 +'• V V .•N. . "IX
VII
VIA
�Y}.+�~: �
s
of
�_ ... -. _. - w•wtiAwrr�••�••�• `•lRVVMAAf/t►�P��rrrNAlN '
tvta .�n� j� }: , „ � fihSc' 3 tt�: 3S�"'Z' K V ; ,n .: : •. J.,•. (: (..r"
— �,� t "�\ li�'4Nh'� • �i r,? �; ArtG .�iJJ�fSt�nvS.bwv�OJ'�OG�J: �..: v •r. .tJ • „„
.�.�... ' :��•��� • ��• � i�; ;,�ni . lu Y'J:rJi flY. 0 J J
. ..HV. ♦ :xh '- '- •TM,�VX/._ :Y��' 7VlWIW'7. {V.K'(: I:.\ :�: ?j .
K OCMtES K,,C/M[yvRO
Et•�Gn�E.EitS �t•+rTEC1S PLMNERS l++�+ �.ut. r++'tao+•
co•w. - - - �
1 - 1942a
t
f
taral�
PLEASE NOTE
This item has been carried over from the June 12, Meeting,
g
Please refer to that packet.
Revocation of Permit (Hause)
PLEASE NOTE:
Councilmember Bastian is to have contacted the nei
Action b Council:
Endorsed
Modified
Re
Date
re the revocation of permit*
jj t
AGENDA REPORT
TOO Cit Manager
FROM: Cit Engineer
SUBJECT: South lawn Drive Traffic
DATE: June 5 1989
AGENDA ITEM
Action b Cou
Endorsed,.......
Modif
Re ected,
Date
Attached i a letter from residents along South lawn Drive, south
of Beam Avenue, listing a number of traffic concerns, It is
apparent from the letter that the generator, of the traffic is the
Maple Knoll Townhomes. When that project was approved, the
developer was re to make a connection from the townhomes'
private,,road to South lawn Drive. This re was based on
providing ade access to the project for public safet
veh.i.cles and traffic. It was felt that a single drivewa to
Radatz and a one-directional drivewa at White Bear Avenue was
not ade for the project.
South lawn Dri was built to serve adjacent propert as well as
the Maple Knoll Townhomes. There is concern about speed, litter,
noise, and propert damage. These issues can onl be addressed
through enforcement of current laws and ordinances. The public
safet director has addressed this aspect in an attached memo.
KGH
iW
Attachments
s
a'
518/89
r
City Council
JL380 E Co. Rd, P.
Maplewood, MN. 55109
Attn: Mike McGOi re
Dear Council Chairman and members.
MAY 1 61989 D
Carl Beohmer 1
22764 Southlawn Dr.
Map i ewood . MN. 55109
777 -4819
I am writing this letter hoping to get some kind of
action s which would effectively eliminate or drastically
reduce. the traffic on Southlawn Drs Which adjoins the
service road to the Maple Knoll Apts.
SAFETY
This traffic regularly e::ceeds reasonable speed l imi + = ,
and is of ter, of a careless nature, Re oidents who live on
Southlawn Dr., children, and other pedestrians, are in
constant danger. road 1 y "blind"
The curves ors this service road are a festive
at the speed which many of these vehicles travel, and loss of
o1 of th= vehicl eL of ten occur. in the Southlawn Dr e
control
cul-de-sac, - w ,ich is often full of sand Dashed down from the
service road
PROPERTY DAMPP__Z, etc e
Traffic rs
o this servJ -ce road and Southlawn Dr. has
resulted ted in damage to both and public property -
Litter is
constant problem. I personally pick. many bags of
-r ' s litter on a week: -1y basis, and dispose of it through my
own
private rubbish service. This litter, of course, is
si htl y, and .often consists of many empty alcoholic
un g
beverage containers.
INCONVENIENCE
Traffic is heavy on Southlawn Dr. to the service road
,
going
to and from the Maple knoll Apts. at all hours of the
day,
into the late evening, and A.M. The noise level is very
bothersome
to residents on Southlawn Dr. It seems the e., hate = t
systems, many t ical "late hour" vehicles using this route
. y YP
is in need of service
I P e r - -tuna 1 1 y have seen motorist using this route
driving
off of the roadway and onto public property, and have
personally experienced property damage at my own residences
which involved the actual destruction of a privacy fence,
well onto property away from the roadway.
•
I would appreciate an opportunity to express my concerns
dealin with the matter above., and I am sure that all
ramsidents livin on Southlawn Dr. would like to have this
4"i'llatter discussed as an official matter on . the councils
.calendar,
Thank y ou ver much
Carl G. Boehmer
We the undersi as residents livin on Southlawn
Dr.,- do concur with the expressions of concern.
as stated in
the letter. above. And wish it be known that we also woLt1d
like some action taken which would improve on the e.-:istin
conditions as stated in this letter.
Address Phone Si
��.�SJ oo,,oaa S°- �4.9a...� 1 4 s
a76o'i
��� v
ZV-
low
�0.v�
�oe�
S�.c.l�. (,�Q� Qenb � C: 50 lauo �w br- 7 37 y � n
A
)a A
Y
; j c
017-
L e
'
'
( S-. '-s-
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
MEMORANDUM
Action b Cou
End ors ed,,,,.
Modifi
Dat
City M .
Director of Community Development
Pipeline Setback Ordinance
June 20, 1989
_ This is a request to readopt
ordinance. The City Council
' 1987, with a stipulation that
Council gave first reading to
..
DISCU8SION
and amend the pipeline setback
adopted the current ordinance in
it expire on July 1, 1989 .
the ordinance on June 8.
'.
This ordinance was originally adopted after the pipeline disaster
in Mouhdsview. The need has hot changed and has been further
reinforced by the recent explosion in San Bernardino, California
(Refer to the attached article.) ^
Several changes are proposed:
1. Section 9-216 has been added by the Planning Commission to
exempt buildings that wev~e constructed prior to the adoption of
the pipeline ordinance.
� 211 There has been some question as to whether garages should be
subject to the setback. A code amendment is proposed to clarify
this issue. Since an attached garage is part of the house, it
should be subject to the setback. Since a detached garage is not
part of the house and is not. genera lly used for human occupancy,
it shpuld not be subject to the setback. The attached ordinance
is amended accordingly, `
3. In section 9-218 approval of a reduced setback would be made
by the director of community development, rather than the city,
with an appeal to the city council . The current ordinance is not
clear as to who is to approve a reduced setback. Another problem
with this section has been in determining whether berms and oil
containment systems will provide enough protection to allow
encroachment into the setback. The proposed change would require
this determination to be made by an expert approved by the fire
marshal .
4. A new section 9-219 has been added to require that grading be
done to maximize the distance between any pipeline leakage and the
proposed or surrounding buildings. A pipeline leak should not be
allowed to flow towards a house.
5. Section 9-220 has been changed to require a certificate of
survey, rather than to rely on field data in locating a pipeline.
Requiring a certificate, signed by a registered land surveyor,
will provide documentation of the pipeline location in case a
dispute arises in the future.
611 Section 9 has been added by the Planni ^
i I .g Commis .ion to
' allow a reduction in setback where the building o addition = would
` be no closer to the pipeline than the prevailing ' eighborhod
~°~-^ setback. '' "
7~
Sect ion 9-222 has been added to proh ibit the irstallation of
sliding glass doors on the rear of homes�abutting ^ i li ne
= a p p
setback. This will prevent from ^ '^
' rrom creating a situation
where a homeowner will be l ed to bel ieve that he can construct a
� deck into the pipeline setback.
n
8. An amendmet to the subdivision ordinance has been added to
require that deed restrictions be added to new lots to put'
homeowners on notice that their lot is effected by th� pipeline
ordinance. �
RECOMMENDATION
Readopt the attached pipeline'setback ordinance as amended.
MEMO5
Attachments:
1, San Bernardino article
211 Pipeline setback ordinance
�� .. •• is a... • -.. I .... _ 4 'i Y `� �j L `
� • � � � '�1►. •r �• � ` a 1�� � • {� `� ;: -� - T> � , � �� � - 't� :�' � ^' • i � i 1. s 1i+ 'a a - L � �. �' � t. � " ?.t �..a
r� .'� ' -si ,a � vp
�, •I �. � ♦. s ;�... S � � � ` •+ f �- ' if. a K j= 3 �! � •.
Id
From News Services
vide food, clothing and lodging.
repaired tracks. "The train went by,
which two crewmen and two boys in
fuel.
and then I heard this loud bang. I just
a house were killed. There was a
San Bernardino, Calif.
The.gasoline leak and fireball erupted
started running," said. Leah Thomas,
"very good possibility'' the 14 -inch
Killed yesterday were a woman, a
Three people were killed Thursday
about 8 a.m, in what used to be the
10, who was waiting for her school
pipeline: was dama'ged' by the train
toddler and another adult whose sex
morning %hen a fireball from a rup-
back yard of a house — one of the
bus. "41y backpack fell off, and I got
accident, said Ken Seal, manager of
could not immediately be deter -
tured gasoline line engulfed homes
houses destroyed when the runaway
burned on my arm by the heat. I was
the Las Vegas office of the Calnev
mined, a deputy coroner said. The
and outraced fleeing children in the
train jumped the tracks on a curve on
screaming. There was smoke and
Pipeline Co., a subsidiary of the Un-
woman's body was found in the back
neighborhood where a runaway train
May 12. Seven homes had been lev-
flames."
ion Pacific Corp,
yard of a house; the other adult and
killed four people and demolished a
eled and the area fenced before the
I
:
the child were found in a room to-
row of houses two weeks ago.
fire.
A passing freight train may have ig-
One locomotive came to rest over
gethcr.
'
nited the spewing gasoline, said
the line, which is six feet under-
At least 31 people were injured, six
"It looks like a bomb went off over
Southern Pacific spokesman Bob
ground, but it didn't appear to have
As they surveyed the burning skcic-
critically. Ten homes and 18 cars
Duffy Street," City Attorrney James
Taggart. Residents have complained
dug deeply enough into the ground to
tons of their houses, residents vowed
were destroyed, and five homes were
Penman said at the scene.
that train wheels throw off' sparks as
have touched the pipe, said Ted Lo-
to leave their neighborhood and ex-
damaged in the blaze, which radiated
they round a curve and say trainmen
patkiewicz of the National Transpor-
pressed anger that authorities had
so much heat that is and pa rdcn
"It's like a nightmare," said Delores
walk alongside afterward and douse
tation Safety Board (NTSB). NTSB
not foreseen the disaster.
crops were singed two bl ocks away.
Jones, whose house was destroyed by
small fires.
investigators who examined the train
At least 10 homes with 200 people
the fire. "I haven't slept since the
train wreck. It's come back to haunt
The fire was extinguished at 4:09
wreck were returning yesterday. '
"We're all nervous wrecks," Allene
Nfuhammad said as she cuddled her
were evacuated, and the residents
me."
p.m., eight hours after the explosion.
The pipeline carries gasoline, diesel
terrified 2 -year -old daughter, Fatin.
will have to wait until at least this
evening before bang allowed back
Witnesses said the firestorm su rged
Residents said they were unaware of
and jet fuel from a tank farm in
Colton, several miles from here, to
"After the train wreck, they told us it
was safe. They were wrong. How can
into their homes, officials said. The
through the neighborhood moments
the pipeline running beneath their
southern- Nevada. It supplies the Las
we live here anymore? How can our
pipeline company said it would pro-
after a freight train roared past on the
properties until the train wreck, in
Vegas Valley with 90 percent of its
children deal with this ?"
D
c-t
ct
n
fD
c
F /
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PIPELINE SETBACK ORDINANCE.
..
The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (additions
underlined and deletions �recrossed out)x
Section 1. The Pipeline Setback Ordinance is amended and adopted
as followsx
ARTICLE XI. PIPELINE SETBACK
Sec~ 9-215. Purpose '
0 . ^
It is the purpose of this article to protect the public from the
hazards of a pipeline leak by requiring that new buildings
designed for` human use or occupancy must
meet a minimum required setback f8 J � -
c . r �- o� - 69��� - _-��-8-��_8��
Se 9-216. Applicability.
This article shall apply to apy
addition ' to be located
a pipeline. 48r^d--No--6G6----+'
new subdivision, building or
within one hundred (100) feet of
As us*0d in this article, the followinq words and phrases shal|
have the meanings ascribed to them in this section:
� Pipeline:
(1) Pipe with a nominal diameter of six (6) inches or
filar-
located in the state, that is to transport
hazardous liquids, but does not includR pipe used to
transport a hazardous liquid by gravity, and pipe used
to transport or store a hazardous liquid within a
refinery, storage, or manufacturing facility, or
(2) Pipe operated at a'' pressure of more than two hundred
seventy-five (275)'pounds per square inch that carries
gas.
`]Building: Any structure designed primarily for human use or
- occupancy, including, but not limited to businesses,
offices, residences and institutions. Decks, overhangs,
porches , or any similar attached
`�structures' shall be considered part of the building.
s h a �-/�on art
Attachment 2
Sec. 9-218. Building setback.
(a) All buildings subject to the provisions of this art cle a"d
' all newly created lots �;hall be desi d t ^ an
(j
o accommodate a
. -
of at least one hundred (100) feet from a pipeline
- frum_tke - & - r^�d�on�-h���
ff�� � itmpr tot
c��ca�-or
fu�z
cet � La ��� mc ot� - ���Lom - o/ - oLhcr - m�����t���-fuc�f���-wh�~ z
cot
c* - etr^e& �--qF|�c 6����n t� b�
- -m��
(b)
Notwithstanding - the above, the Director of COM(T)Ltnj.i,-\/
` addJtion would not be an clot-ier than th
' of neight bU i I d i!jqc
The Directorls decision may bq.�
te
.�
_
S
ec. 9- 2 2- 0� 9-2+9�r Pipeline location.
At the time of application'for a building permit, site plan
review or preliminary plat, the applicant shall provide a
I 'I "' n
::) -a n w h e n F-.-i t..t c: h 1 ::) 1 a n i s ��lr-8-��-8�f' ' - -- ---'--^^~^ 4 '"^ .`"°-"���-
Gec. Lot of record.
.
A proposed building on an undeveloped lot of record that cannot
be constructed beca�se of this article, sh 'll be allowed to be
. constructed if the building is located so as to comply with this
article as close1yas possible. The City ma' � require an oil
.
containment system, to be approved by the Ci Engineer. An
doors
IB '
Section 2. Section 30-8 (f) (12) ^s amended as follows:
(12) Pipelines. The City may require additional lot width
or depth to provide enough buildable area to meet the
pipeline setback ordinance in article XI of chapter 9.
Wherever practical, subdivisions shall be designed with
an existing pipeline along rear lot lines. A deed
within the IQC
this I ot is
subj.Rct to a pipel ine setbac-1:1- a n d t t
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and
publication.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 1989.
'
Attest: Mayor
Cit C1 erk
Ayes--
Nays--
AGENDA I TEM
AGENDA REPORT Action by Ccurj0.i1:j
Endorse,4.
Manager
TOO Cit L.L.
Modif.1
ReJectr.-d
FROM: Assistant Cit Engineer
Date
SUBJECT: Pipeline Setback Variance--Lot 15, Block- 2 Hi 1 Is and
,Eia] es (Dul Ltth and Junction)
DATE.: June 5 1989
If
The attached re for a variance from the pipeline setback
re of Ordinance 9-215 was received. There is a
miti factor in this circumstance. The topography drains
from the pipeline toward a low area on Junction Avenue and away
+ . rom the proposed house pad. However there are several adverse
1. ' : feet is a signi-fic
factors
A setback. of 55 ant reduction since
the adverse affects of an incident increase g eometricallyq rather
than proportional I y with proximity to the source. The proposed
house is on the far end of a dead-end street that ma be isolared
from direct emergency vehicle access in the event of an incident
since the pip, crossing and low area are toward the
i n t ersec t on J4
umber of potential variables such as the
In vi of the I arge n
.type . of petroleLim prodLICt being conve b the pipeline at the
time of a potential incident, weather conditionsq source of
engineering department
• '
gnition, etc.,, t . is not possible for the enc a d
to evalitate the relative safet of the proposed variance compared
It is recommended
to the setbaci, stipulated in the ordinance.
that the applicant obtain the services of a recognised eXpert in
fire safet engineering to evaluate and mak-e recommendat ions
.concerning this particular -
ESA
ic
Attachments
Bernard A. and Tamara M. Heroff
2137 Duluth Place
Maplewood, MN 55109
(Lot 15, Block 2, Hills and
Dales; Section 16)
March 5, 1989
City of Maplewood
1.830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Reduced Pipeline Setback
We, Bernard and Tamara Heroff, respectfully request that the
City of Maplewood review the attached plans, surveys and drawings
and approve a reduced pipeline setback as allowed in Chapter 9,
Article XI, sec. 9 -218, Maplewood code of ordinances.
Background: .
The previous owner of Lot 15, Ms. Merilyn Berg, initiated the
development of lots l & 15 in July of 1983 when Williams Pipeline
Company said they were willing to allow a driveway and utilities
to cross their lines (exhibit A) . Ms. ,Berg had the land surveyed
by a registered surveyor on November 1, 1983 (exhibit B). Lot 1,
the land needed for access to the northern portion of lot 15, was
to be auctioned at a Ramsey County tax forfeit land sale on Nov 4,
1983:. The City of Maplewood blocked the sale of lot 1 on the
grounds that it needed the land for holding runoff (there is no
storm sewer on Junction Ave). During the summer of 1984 Ms. Berg
worked with Ramsey County and the City of Maplewood for the
release of a portion of lot 1 large enough to combine with part of
lot 15 for the creation of a buildable lot ( exhibit C ) . The City
and County were hopefull of returning at least part of lot 1 to
the tax rolls. It was agreed that the westerly 76.67 feet m.o.l.
of lot 1 would be auctioned at the next tax forfeit land sale.
We purchased lot 15 from Ms. Berg in November of 1984, paying
a premium for the prospect of developing the new lot. We
purchased the Westerly 76.67 of lot 1 on Sept 27, 1985. We
intended to split lot 15 and build a home for ourselves on the new
lot after several years of building equity in lot 15
The Proposed Lot:
The attached drawings are derived from the registered
surveyor
10 specification (exhibit B), City of Maplewood "s aerial
topographic survey (exhibit D) and sewer plan /profile (exhibit E),
and Williams Pipeline Company "s tract map ( exhibit F) . The
pipeline locations and depths in the path of the driveway were
verified with the assistance of William's locator service.
City of 1"1 c1 J- e ood -2 March 15 1989
Exhibit G illustrates how the proposed lot and house are
located relative to surround p opertles. Drawing 1 shows the
proposed lot split, 1'Mtended to keep the house 55 feet from the
p
pipeline while mainta.in.g 20% rear yard setbacks for both tracts.
We believe the house would be protected from the hazards of a
. Pipeline eline leak at a 55 foot setback due to the topography of the
lot and adjacent land.
Drawing 2 shows the present contours of the lot and adjacent
land in the direction of the pipelines. Drawing 3 shows the same
land area after grading for a driveway and drainage for the
building site. Drawings 4,5 and 6 are profiles of the elevations
along sections A,B and C, respectively. At an elevation of 903,
the building site is 12 feet above the level o f the roadway and 10
feet above the level of the pipelines. All of the lot drains
either northerly to Junction Avenue, which flows toward the pond,
or to the pond directly. The land directly over the pipelines
also slopes toward the pond at grades varying from 12 to 26
percent. As shown in the profiles, the land between the pipelines
and the pond does not level out significantly within 100 feet of
the house. It is our contention that any leaks in the pipelines
would migrate towards the pond, which is more than 100 feet from
th.e house. Significant amounts of liquids could not accumulate on
the slopes. Even gasoline vapor, which is heavier than air, would
tend to move toward the pond area.
As we intend to live in the.house built on this proposed lot
we are truly concerned about the safety of living near the
pipelines. We are -confident that the unique contours of this lot
and with prudent construction methods (i.e. fire resistive
exteri�� , ��1� licuse will be protected from the hazards of a
pipeline leak.
Sincerely,
Bernard A. Heroff
�.
Tamara M. Herof f ``�`-
PKWY 000S • oon
tp
1p-
Keller Lake
CO � r C Cc' E
L A,
D
D
R
r cl 3
LE
0
*"E
(1) CHAMS S ST N _' ,
4k 4
40.
UL
/L
1.6
2 �- �'
FR OST
W 60 27 F EZ TO AV
y J � �
V � a
Cc FR S E AV
W
� J 62 Q. <
RIPLEY
W con
W
�. nd
eke j
z
Z
LA R' N T E UA
I Lake Phalen
30
A % I
Mi
HE R R E �4
A'nuc A j
I - a p � MMWWMM�
LAURT
s p
1-ND- i u R ;T
BUI FRI K E
A �j
6 E L
>
A V
r -
V)
uwj
01
c
a) cr-
V) LUL)
�s
I
S L
R AV su m
C0
,
dc
z
w
u
Ilk > lv�IKEFIELD
5 1- V
z
61
HIIA
PRICE
AV %>)
o L4KE �cr
bo > ,�
AV
\
AO 3 ••i ce .k°`
A O AO
p) \ ZO
A '
\ (Op t o -
o - CAW u \ G\tA V vim\ Z � , y, � I' ' \o
A AO
Alo
z ,w
,60 \ 13 f S'� •� �� ''� X
QA \ Ar
S P
N
too to II
Q�S -1 ► 1 I
co
N � V- 4 - -
RIZO
s o 0 0 0
\A 0 100
� � �2 � � �. \. � � � •, • 4 :'1 9 �, �5
.� a, 17 _ ° 6 N! 1 a
° Qj M -ts (9�� 5) 9� _ 8 >
v °) 5
50
3� 13�' `E s ► — — a
N o n
_•-
2 ` ti 1 ' 2 ' Sr
k c� 3
E�
• � 10
Of
2 0 9
O ro
2
r -�
%0 -701
w
ou �. s e
1 � �
Go
eA e r
N
WILLIAMS PIPE LINE COMPANY
ONE OF THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES
APACHE OFFICE PARK -SUITE 246
250039th AVENUE NORTHEAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421
July 26, 1983
Merilyn Berg
2137 Duluth Place
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Tract #3305
Dear Ms.. Berg
This letter will confirm our telephone conversations regarding
Lots #1 & #15, BK 2 of Hills and [)ales Subdivision. We will be
willing to grant permission to cross our easement corridor with
a drive and necessary utilities provided that adequate cover will
be maintained over the pipe lines and that the utilities, if
buried, cross under our lines with at lease a foot of separation.
If you decide to proceed with your proposed house, contact us to
secure the proper agreement. If you have any further quest ions ,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
D. L. Berry
Supervisor
Lines and Right of Ways
DLB I jmb
cc H. E. Janzen
J. R. Grisham
0 1.
PHONE (612) 633 -1555
a
x
2
r1ro
J�
�o
JOS
SqB
S93
Secrionl /{
OR IVE wily)
2 S 5D 7 5
�i
strrjcF. F&OM qou�E t T` .
1
PJ P E L i /V
EL�vAT�
tFr�
903
8918
6,1
X25
'3'VNCT; CA)
EIevATiurJ $9f
Ar r34 FT
4.
mo t`
E L EVATIO
I
_.. �3
n
SFcriaN
T
�i,��' z J rJ E S
?0O �c
19R A
2.5 5 0 , 5
lkfrrJCE FR o r�
0
>11s
�1
,
40
(Fr)
0 3
v
M
S98
$93
b88
SEcrior� C
z5 50 *7S
ST N C E o Al if ou s E (Fr)
DRIIVVI,V& �
, tt,
1 �
�� Y
T ON
i w \ \ Ste\
i
1 F, IN,
'. T / < r :
1C, 'N."
FFEr \
�
2
yo PAOPDS E
rV
j�oviE Z 5
t
�., q 9
r
i
TKA4
J`
N
/ wo IN
C
loot
i
�vE
" r
-
F
LOT FX CFP7"
s CA L 6 )rj cN : = 30 FE ET
E)CZEPt' Ytif
50VTMEAL Y 5
FT, A 1. rj R_kack
2 � H'LLS �^►�
QRLE j � RArhSE � CCvMT
r+� r #v IV p T A
�
7RACT
H
2�y0
-t e NCRTHC- Rjy
Zoo FT, t?loCk
^M
D19LE j, �E'An� Sc Y
C001v7Y 'vAi^fN So T ry
OvLEITH PLACE
,
TR /CT
w
'
�
�1 Z
f '
1
_
`
-1H
PL il
i
�vE
" r
LOT FX CFP7"
T HE 69s TEXI.V 12
FEET /9 N40
E)CZEPt' Ytif
50VTMEAL Y 5
FT, A 1. rj R_kack
2 � H'LLS �^►�
QRLE j � RArhSE � CCvMT
r+� r #v IV p T A
7RACT
�.oT 15 x«
-t e NCRTHC- Rjy
Zoo FT, t?loCk
Z H 4 L S nNQ
D19LE j, �E'An� Sc Y
C001v7Y 'vAi^fN So T ry
1 40, 10 -- I
Oil
8
� �N-
0/
m
C ON 0
E L 41 FfF
14 �
o FECT
'�'V /v 6 TIO A] /i LIE
P PEL IN E 5
00
�9:, 89
1
19
` 4
M r I
J �
9 c
9 0
906
i -
to, -
. rlel
F
CorJ7ovRS
C dN � R
7vc rI��
r
/iFTE R
AN bRAOrrv�-
ILA;
AGENDA REPORT
TO:'
1��� y��na�er~
����it�� manager
FROM:
Assistant ���
'
SUBJECT:
Pipeline Set
`
'
DATE: T�:
,J une 5, 1989
^�
Action by Council#j
Fndorse
'Modified_.�_~~��
Rejected____~___
Dat
T/e �ollowing drawing wlth field measured spot elevations was
��
''� d f om the develoer of the Maplewood Meadows'subdivi
p sion
to �� variance _
- e i v�* t�f r` i from the setback. requirements of Ordinance
9_215. The building pads of s on e us � \/
- f �h lots the side of Gal l
Avenue have an 80-foot. setbacks T h i s was allowed since there was
not omnou�� � distance to have the Stipulated 100-foot setback and
�six-foot high berms were placed as a mitigating factor. The
request is to allow decks extending ` ng another ten feet toward the
pipeline to be constr'�/ctVed .
The t. pography is such that an elevated deck would be protected ' | direct radiant t heat by the berm if the f l ames of a burninburning �spil l stayed close o e
- t d l t the level of the bottom of the adjacent
displaced.
storm mater pond and the berm was no t How**ver , under
certaln weather conditions' the burning spilled project might lift
-
flames 1ames �loft. In this-case the deck and house would be
subjected to radiant direct di t heat . Since the intensity of radiant
heat var geometrically, the heat intensity at 70 feet is
significantly ' greater than at B0 feet or 100 feet.
The oretically, the heat intensity at 70 feet distance form the
s ourc e -- - would be xapprox imatel \, twice that at 100 feet distance.
'
It is not poesibl ce for the engineering department to
quantitatively evaluate the relative safety of the proposed
variance,
It is recommended d d that the applicant retain the
services of a recognized expert in fire safety engineering to
evaluate and � ak� recommendations concerning the variance in this
particular situations
BAI
'
w�ssi�tamt ���t`� Engineer '
� Se�beck Variance--Maplewood Meadows
jc
go
A �',•• ..
P 4x ci
ire
Ofto
!2 i a • s. , - ;, a Sa
10 4w
w 1 44 4b: - ''
L. 741. 13 i • AV% v s illillilillilljllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIII `�'' �� (o3s 8 06, •
qb 10
sl 15
14
me-45 ts to
.9 IMII
1.10
--�j
it
lot go 0
it 40
x --- IIIIIIIIII�
r IF
�, , • _ �1
• �1 .�-.— .. ___..1 L_._ .M�.l....._r.....�....... 17 r
Of
mows
• �•
s�...�+rr �:... • µr �+rY� � �• is t � iS�� # 00 � � � 6. � � • � `�•.
• �. GALL. _ ILA
CIIIIi ass so 1� _ � � �.. •. �'�'. � i• � ��wr =:.+rte • �.•r - ••...•.� � �� M ��A • �� •• • ' ft 00
• •
•
,AVENUE
ti �� •
Ad 16 :�• � �
♦ . ..
t o • • • r .. w
I 1
` ..
WOW
• ;
ar
g :yip 12 13 14
2 a 3 it.4
f �
— . ,► d •
i Drs....�t �•�✓ li+�1� Eon + l •- p T• y I t I . ' s 1 l • IWO •
map Alf lob so do
1816 led
w opt
• f
Dec. I�• i1t�111� !�. 1 M•?�'?!' ii •� �
♦ lb i tea
•„
Mo
,�.,...... •.• at. M 3 7.0
wo
�� • . ice....• . • • • • • • ` .
•••'' : ` r. ±•L .� R' , � / / , C a M '^ tsr +��s) . ••'� r •J }, II. f i�:�I {' ' 1 , , �•���
• a..jw,.,._ I JCS v v ,.a _ • _.
�. o• p r o ,� ca a� o a s o u •• 1� �
4f
j 38Z.. 1- - 307.(66 �.= :--- -- ----- 5��.
#vs A A*vc P/ 81"A 6. .48 7 *O * a * E
t op
1
G -8
MEMORANDUM
TO
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:.
APPL I CANT /OWNER:
PROJECT:
DATE:
Cit Manager
Associate Planner--Tom Ek-strAnd
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL
2095 E. Larpenteur Avenue
Ronald Des Lauries
The Delor Compan
June 2, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
"-^
Action b Councirn.
Endorsed-...-,
Modif ied,
Re ected.
Dat e- __
Renewal of a conditional use permit (CUP) to continue the Del or
Compan a basement waterproofing and sewer and water
installation business. (Refer to the applicant's letter of
re on page 7.)
BAEXGROUND
This business has been in operation since 1971. On April 15,
1982, the Cit Council granted a CUP to allow this home
occupation for seven y ears (see page 8) , b which time, the
applicant intended to have his business relocated to Hugo. Due
to zoning regulations in Hugo, the applicant is no longer able to
relocate there.
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Subsections 36-442 (e) and (,+):
(e) All conditional use permits shall be reviewed b the council
within one y ear of the date of initial approval , unless such
review is waived b council decision or ordinance. At,the
one- review, the council ma specif an indefinite term
or specific term, not to exceed five (5) y ears, for
Subse reviews. The council ma impose new or
additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the
initial or subse revie A conditional use permit
shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon
are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the
cit from enacting or amending official controls to change
the status of conditional uses. An conditional use that
meets the agreed upon conditions and is later disallowed
because of the cit enacting or amending official controls
shall be considered a legal nonconforming use.
The council ma upon review, terminate the permit if the
.approved conditions ma have been violated or the use is no
longer in effect.
1
Noncom I lance with Current Home Occup Guidel ines. (Refer to
g uidelines on -pa.
g e 9.)
This business does not meet. al I of the current re for a
home occupation. The business is "grand+athered' * ' under previous
r egulations. The activities that do not compl are as follows:
is Traffic volumes are greater than would normall be expected
in a residential neighborhood, due to the applicant's trucks
and +our emplo
2a There are +our nonresident emplo Code allows one on-
site at a time.
3w The emplo sometimes park along Beebe Road. Code
re on-site parking.
4a The business use on this propert exceeds 20% of the house
and garage area. The site has a separate out-building used
as an office and a pole building.
DISCUSSION
In 1982 , the Cit Council worked with the applicant to enable him
to relocate his business within .seven y ears. The applicant made
a g ood-+ai t , ; h attempt to accomplish this goal but due to zoning
regulations in Hugo, cannot move his business to this land,
While this business does not meet the current criteria for a home
occupation, it has also not caused an problems. In the 18 y ears
it has been in operation, there have not been an complaints from
neighbors. B being located on top of the hill, the business is
secluded and screened from the public's view. In addition,
Larpenteur Avenue is not a q uite residential street.
Due to its nonconformities with Code, staff feels that this
business should eventuall be terminated. Based on the non-
nuisance nature of this business, however., the applicant should
be granted one final renewal , b which time the business must
cease at this location. The applicant has re five y ears.
Staff feels that as development is increasing around this site.,
the use should be terminated in three y ears with annual reviews
to determine the applicant's progress.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the renewal of the conditional use
basement waterproofing and sewer and water
at 2095 East Larpenteur Avenue for a period
Approval is recommended on the basis that
permit to operate a
instal I ation business
of five y ears.
2
The Cit has not received an complaints from neighbors in
.the 18 y ears the business has been in operation.
201 The business is not easil visible from Larpenteur Avenue.
3W The applicant is continuing, in good falith, to find an
alternative site for his operations,
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
is The hours of operation shat I be 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monda
through Frida
2W The maximum number of emplo that ma be permitted, other
than famil members, is four,
30 There shall be no retail sales on site.
4a The business shat 1 not be enlarged .
5W Bus iness-related parking shall be prohibited. on Larpenteur
Avenue.
6a The business shall terminate in three y ears. Annual Council
reviews shall be re to monitor the applicant's
progress,
3
BACKGROL1ND
Site DescriDt ion
1 a Lot Size: 1.03 acres
2 a Ex ist ing I and use: Singl e dwel I ing a metal storage
building, a wooden shed, garage and a small one-stor
structure used as an office b the applicant.
Surround in Land Uses
Northerl So w3'..nds of Maplewood rental townho'mes
Southerl Larpenteur Avenue. South of Larpenteur Avenue are
single dwel I ings in the Cit of St Paul
Easterl A singl e dwelling and a Maplewood water pump
station
Westerl Mounds Park Academ parking lot
DEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Plannin
I Land Use Plan Designation:
Because of the site's small size, the M, Municipal Facilit
designation for the pump station covers the site.
2w Zoning: R
Public Safe
No on- �: _:;r:: ing shoul d be al I owed on Larpenteur Avenue b
:.
emplo or customers.
mb
Enclosures*.
1. Land Use Plan Map
2. Propert Line Map
3. Appl icant's Letter dated April 21 1989
4. Council's April 15, 1982 approval
5. Home occupation guidelines
4
r
1 L•
' mow w. •- �:::.�:::
VIC%t
1. T'-
r
# 41 I ..
Rv
Q
f
- t,u •.
1
R
Hillside
LAND USE PLAN
s
now
Attachment 1
i1 l11
Y� m
M arterial Lrenteur
• _ os
LSC
4
P 4 ,
4
N
.A,
G7-
F!.t*
161
;F
EL 16 "-T
�� W= IL N WL W1 Lr 1W, xww
�A
1 . Tki
U- TIP
rL
C�
3w
SO LR INDS o
I
G 543
or
PLEWtOD
F
2ND ADDS
rl
Hillside 'School
-7
/3a.4( zen 5 04
1735 1737
1731 1733
1725 1729
0 .1 1721 1723
1715 1717
1711 1713
........... 1707 17051
701 1703
bc -5G 35-.41- 1
ole Bld
Offic
rn
oo 0! C
4p Ump House
~ i' 319.87 1689
z
f. he
Uy
IOU
1 .-13
Ch.
I C
4q�
23
7) 1 - eue:) eue / 0 1 z U v 3M
2 Ld Vpt:!" 61CU V VZ"UZ - 2135
N. 85 I- A
L -7 RES.
PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP
6 Attachment 2
Q
N
APRIL 21, 1989
THOMAS EKSTRAND, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B
MAPLEWOOD, MN. 55109
RE; HOME OCCUPATION RENEWAL
DEAR MR. EKSTRAND;
WE ARE ASKING YOU TO EXTEND THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO OPERATE A WATER.
PROOFING BUSINESS AT 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE. FOR AN ADDITIONAL FIVE YEARS.
PLEASE LET ME EXPLAINE WHY, THREE YEARS AGO I PURCHASED A FAIM TV NUGO, MN.,
WITH-.THE INTENTION OF MOVING THE BUSINESS OUT THERE, BEFORE WE PURCHASED
THE PROPERTY WE ASKED THE CITY ENGINEER IF WE COULD MOPE OUR BUSINESS TO
THAT LOCATION, AS IT WOULD TAKE UP ABOUT 1/4 OF AN ACRE, AND WE HAD PURCHASED
35 ACRES THE CITY ENGINEER GAVE US THE 0 . K .. WE THEN MORTGAGED OUR PROPERTY
AT 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE FOR THE DOWN PAYMENT ON THE HUGO PROPERTY, THE
PURCHASE TOOK APPROXIMATELY 3 TO 4 MONTHS FOR TITLE CHECKING AND ACTUAL
CLOSING ON THE PROPERTY, DURING THAT TIME THE CITY ENGINEER WAS REPLACED
BT -W NEW- ENGINEER . HE INFORMED US THAT WE COULD NOT MOVE OUR BUSINESS
TO THE FARM. WE NOW HAVE 2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE. WITH A MORTGAGE THAT WE
ARE PAYING OFF, AND THE FARM WE ARE PAYING FOR. THIS.WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN
SO BAD, BUT MY BUSINESS IS WATERPROOFING BASEMENTS, AND LAST YEAR AS YOU
KNOW, WAS VERY DRY, OUR BUSINESS,...AS WITH MANY WATERPROOFING COMPANIES, HAD
A TOUGH YEAR — NO RAIN MEANS NO WET BASEMENTS TO DRY UP,
WE ARE ASKING THE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO EXTEND OUR STAY AT LEAST FIVE MORE
YEARS' SO THAT WE CAN GET A HANDLE ON MATTERS FINANCIALLY. WE WILL COMPLY
WITH ALL RULES SET DOWN BY THE COUNCIL MEMBERS. AS OF THIS DATE THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD HAS HAD NO COMPLAINTS ON US AND WE HAVE ONLY ONE NEIGHBOR
R. FITCH, ON BEEBE ROAD, WHO HAS HAD NO COMPLAINT AGAINST US IN THE 17
YEARS THAT WE HAVE BEEN HERE,
THANK YOU FOR THE TIME INVOLVED IN REVIEWING THIS MATTER,
RESPECTFULLY,
RONALD J. DE,Si.A'tIES
2095 E. LARPENTEUR AVE.
MAPLEWOOD, MN, 55109
7 Attachment 3
i
i
pp
F-
t
•
20
Special Exception: 2095 E. Larpenteur Avenue
a.
Manager Evans presented the staff report.
b.
Councilmember Anderson moved a rove -the special exce tion permit to operate
a- business at 2095 East Larpenteur for a period of time not to exceed
seven ears, after time the business be terminated. App roval is recommended
on
the basis that:
r,
1.
The City has not received any complaints about this business from the neighbors.
20
The subject property is not easily visible from Larpenteur Avenue.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
,
1.
The hours of o eration shall be f rom 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p. m., Monday through
P
,•
Friday. �!
2.
The maximum number of employees that may be permitted, other than family members,,
is four. ti
_
3.
There shall be no retail sales from the premises.
-
4.
The business shall not be enlarged. .
5.
' on Larpenteur Avenue, related to this business, shall be prohibited.
Any parking p
6.
A fter three ears the Council shall review the applicant's operation for com—
A y
pliance with the above conditions.
Attachment 4
/.,
HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE REOUlREMENTS
. '
1. No traffic shall be genera
greater Volumes than woul d
residential neighborhood.
shall not exceed more than
for home occupation at any
parkincj spaces required by
ted by a home occupation in
normally be e:pected in a
The need for off-street par\ir`o
three off-street par�ing spaces
given time, in addition to .the
the residents. '
2^ No more than one nonresident employee shall be allowed to
work on the premises. Nonresident employees who work off
i be allowed � visit the i If
premises may �w o v s � pr�m ses.� an on-
site employee is parking on site. off-site employe�s shall
.not leave their vehicles on site. %f there is no om-site
employee vehicle parked on site, one off-site employee
vehicle may be parked on site.
3. No vehicle associated with the home occupation, including
customers or employees, shall be parked on the street or
' block sidewalks or public easements. Private vehicles used
by th�e. residents shall not be included in this r equirement~
4. An area equivalent to no more than twenty (20> percent of
/ each level of the house, including the base:nen± and gara*a`,
shall be used in the conduct of a home occupation.
5° There shall be no change visible off premises in the outside
appearance of the building or premises that would indicate
the conduct of a home occupation, other than one sign
meeting the requirements of the city sign code.
6. No more than 20% of business income shall come from the sale
of products produced off site unless approved by the city
council.
7_ No equipment or process shall be used in such home
occupation which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes,
odors or electrical interference detectable to the no/`mal
senses off the lot. In the case of electrical interference,
no equ p o r process
i ment hall be used which creates viSual
sa
' or audible interference in any radio or television receivers
off the premises, or causes fluctuations in line voltage off
the premises~
B~ There shall be no fire, safety or heaVth hazardsi.^ '
90 ' A home occun-n.1 shall not include the repalr of internnl
combustion engines, body shops, machine shops, welding,
ammunition manufacturing or other~ objectionahle uses
determined by the cit\'. Machine shops are defined as places
where raw metal is fsb/icated using machines that operate
on more than one hundred twenty volts of current.
Attachment 5
6 ?
MEMORANDUM
City TO: y
FROM: Director of Community Development
S BJECT: Code Amendment - Occupancy Permits
DATE: June 14, 1989
Action by �
Endorsed
Modif imd_�____�
Rejeoted__�_-___-
Dat
T'he City Council gave first reading to a similar ordinance on
March 2 19B9. This ordinance is needed by the buyer of the old
City Hall on Frost Avenue. Section 9-41 of the City Code
requires that a building that has been vacant for at least 30
d ays Must comp l y with all pertinent provisions of the City
Building Code. In the case of the old City Hall, this would mean
.extensive renovation, including a'sprinkler system. Staff can
see no reason to require vacant buildings to comply with current
codes when occupied buildings can be sold without complying with
current codes. In addition to the above change, sections 9-4.'2' and
9-44 have been deleted, since they duplicate section 9-26.
Section 9-43 has been moved to section 9-26 for better
i ti
organ za on.
RECOMMENDAT
Approve the attached ordinance
mb\occperm.ord
Attachment: Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN 8RDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows (additions
are underlined and deletions crossed out):
Section 1. Section 9-26 is amended as follows:
Sec. 9-26. Certificate of occupancy.
(a) No building or structure shall be used or occupied, and no
cnange in the existing occupancy classification of a
building or structmre or portion thereof shall be made until
the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy
therefore as provided herein. As required by the city, a
certificate of occupanCy is required for all occupancies,
including group R-3 and R-4 with the exception of Group M
occupancies.
(b) No change in the character of occupancy of a building shall
be made without a certificate of occupancy, as required in
�Section 307 of the Uniform Building Code. The building
official may issue a certificate of occupancy pursuant to
the intent of the above exception without certify1n9 that
the building complies with all provisions of this Code.
(c) The fees for certificate of occupancy and occupancy permits
� issued under this article shall be imposed, set, established
and fixed by the city council , by resolution from time to
time.
(d) �� der -Lh���
area surrQLAndinct any
gj .-I-and b�hfnt all debris shall be com:_...l..ete..1..y_remoyed from the
py -%emLses to the satisfaction of the buildin
Section 2. 2. Article III of Chapter 9 is hereby deleted follows:
ARTICLE III, EERT+FieATES-eF-EeeHPANe*
se-c-.-9-4+-.-feq d +red-be+ Mt--in
whufc_ur-+n-Part for~-em Y-p"rposc7-whuLsucvcr--ttxL-if
b��fJ�o�-off�c�af�-sLaL�n�-tho�t-Lhe
cump�i la.s-wiLh-aff -Pert iocnL-PruV+siunS-of-Lke-c+Ly-�uoing
Stmwc-m -etc
�i�s�- r�ar��t��f• c�t��• i• �t�- �tt���- �f�- ��q�- ��r��tc��t��� -c�f�•�tt•�•�r�•�rt� �•rt -t�t�
tW.tV+ rttc t ed -or- m ew+ P +ekc ed- b tt-i+d me-I -b e-c+eetmed tt P -sin
Sern-N-9-44-Fe "_,-v
--iretmitie- + 91f 6 5.5 4 4 -)
Spcs. 9-41,..45 - 9-6(--). Reserved.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take e++ect upon its
passage and publication.
Passed b the Maplewood Cit Council on I 1989a
Ma
Attest:
------ ----- ------- - -
Cit Cl err A -
N -_
6
Agenda Number 14 -16
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM
RE:
DATE
Mayor and City Council
City Manager:
COUNCIL /MANAGER MEETING
June 19, 1989
Action by Council:i
Endorsed
Modified�,�
Re j ect e d.
1: Date.
'l f(
At the last Council /Manager meeting it was decided that an
additional one be scheduled when all six could be present. Two
possible dates are Tuesday, June 27th or Wednesday, June 28th at
4 :30 p.m.
Please check your calendars and let me know which date is best for
you so we can schedule a meeting.
MAM : kaz
Agenda Number //—/
AGENDA REPORT
T0:
FROM:
RE:
DATE
City Manager
Finance Director
1990 BUDGET MEETINGS
June 15, 1989
4
Action by Council
Endorsed.. .,
Modified
Rejected,
Date
The timetable for the 1990 Budget provides that the ro
et will p posed
budget be formally presented to the Council at its meeting
July 10th. This is earlier than o n
past years because of the Truth
i
in Taxation provisions included n the 1988 tax bill. At this
time, it appears we will have to follow the rovisions of
p this law
because the
special legislative session for a new tax bill will
not be held until mid - September and our tax levy eeds to b
certified b August y e
y g 1st (see attached schedule }.
It is recommended that the Council schedule
edule special meetings
between July 11th and 30th to review the proposed budget. p p g Also,
it is recommended that a public hearing be scheduled for Monday,
.m. in the
October 2nd, at 7:00
p e Council Chambers.
DFF: kaz
Attachment
J ul 10 At Council meeting, 9 City Manager formally presents the Proposed 1990
Budget.
Jul 11 Special Council meetings with City Manager and Department Heads to
thru the Proposed 1990 Budget.
Jul 31
Aug 01
Finance Director certifies a tax levy based on the proposed budget
to the county auditor.
Aug 08
County Auditor certifies "no increase tax rate" and a "proposed tax
rate."
no increase tax rate" - prior year levy divided by current
year net tax capacity excluding property changes made since
the previous assessment.
" proposed tax rate" - proposed current year levy divided by
current year net tax capacity including property changes made
since the previous assessment.
Aug 14
At regular Council meeting, the final proposed tax levy is approved
by the Council.
Au g g15
Finance Director certifies a final proposed levy to the county
auditor and the date Mapl ew . 00d wi 11 hol d a publ i c budget and property
tax levy hearing . (The county auditor is to determine tax capacity
rates for the final proposed levies and notify the taxing districts
of the rates and their percent increase, if any, over the "no
increase tax rate. ")
Sep 06
Publication of public hearing otice on the 1990 Budget. Copies of
P 9
the proposed Budget made available to the public. (Notice must be
published by September 15.)
Sep 15
Deadline for the county auditor to mail a notice to each taxpayer
subject to a proposed tax increase. The notice is to include the
market value, the no increase tax -and proposed tax by taxing
district. It is also to list the time and place of the taxing
district budget hearings.
Oct 02 Public hearing and Council adoption of the 1990 Budget.
Oct 03 Finance Director prepares tax certification forms and itemization
thru of approved capital outlay for 1990 Budget administration. (Tax
Oct 06 certification due by October 25.)
Oct 18 Summary Budget Statement published in accordance with the State
Auditors guidelines.
Oct 23 Finance Director finalizes proposals for increases in license and
thru permit fees, ambulance charges and utility rates.
Oct 27
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: City Manager
RE: PROPOSED SETTLEMENT - SERGEANTS
DATE: June 19, 1989
Attached is the proposed settlement with the
Sergeants. This has been approved b the membership.
Y hip.
Approval is recommended.
MAM : kaz
Attachment
Action by Council','
Endorsed
Modified—_
Reiected�
Date
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PROPOSAL TO
POLICE SERGEANTS
May 5, 19 89
1) WAGE INCREASE: 4.0% increase over 1988 pay equity base ($120 /month)
effective 01/01/89.
2 ) LIEE INSURANCE: Increase l i f e insurance coverage from $15,000 to $25,000,
3) HEALTH INSURANCE: Increase employer contribution for dependent health
insurance by $10.000
4) OVERTIME: No overtime shall be paid for any shift extension of less than
one -half hour; unless the extension is greater than one -half
hour, then the entire shift extension shall be considered
overtime.
5) LONGEVITY: Eliminate 12 and 16 year step. Any officer promoted to
Sergeant may retain their existing longevity. Any sergeant
promoted as of 01/01/89 shall be allowed to move one step in
their normal progression during the term of this Agreement.
6) MERIT PAY: The Employer agrees to establ i sh a merit system by contri but ng
and paying out 3% of bargaining unit's total pay. No employee
shall receive over 5 %. Employees promoted on or after October
1st of each year will not be eligible for merit pay within that
calendar year. Merit pay for employees promoted prior to
October 1st shall be prorated.
7) DURATION: This Agreement shall be effective from 01/01/89 through
12/31/90, with a wage and insurance reopener on 12 /31/89.
}f -3
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins �'�c`_.-
Subject: Request to Promote Police Officer to Sergeant
Date: June 19, 1989
Background
� Action by Council:
Endorse d�... I rr i
Modified
R e j e c t e d..,._,.
Date
Sergeant Joseph Zappa retired from the Maplewood Police Department on
May 31, 1989, creating a supervisory vacancy.
The police department is currently authori zed ei g Sergeant positions.
With the vacancy that was created, the work of this vacant posi tion must be
.handled by the other seven supervisors. This is accompl'ished
extended hours and overtime.. Further complicating the shortage is the
fact that the seven Sergeants average four and one— quarter weeks vacation
each per year, and a great deal of scheduling changes have to be made plus
overtime assigned to handle assigned duties when these individuals are off.
The Civil Service Commission is currently in the process of conducting a
promoti examination . for - the rank of Sergeant.
I am requesting permission to promote one of the top three Sergeant candi-
dates from the list that will be established from this promotional examina—
tion.
Recommendation
That be given to fill the current vacancy in rank of Sergeant.
Action Req u i red
For your review and approval and forwarding to the City Council for their
review and approval..
KVC: j s
N -�
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins { �`v�
Subject: Replacement of Clerk Typist
Date June 16, 1989
Action by Council ,
Endorsed
I�od.if i ec�,
Rej ect
Date
Background
Full —Time Clerk Typist Joy Omath, who has worked for the City for the past
13 years, w i l l be retiri effective June 23, 19898
It is imperative, because of vacations and the large volume of work that
is generated during the summer, that this position be filled as soon as
possible.
I am requesting permission to begin the advertising and selection process
to fill this soon— to —be— vacant position.
Recommendation
That approval be given to post a vacancy in this position and start the
selection process.
Action Required
Approve and send to the City Council with recommendation for their review
and approval.
KVC: j s
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins
Subject: Request to Hire Police e Officer
Date: June 19, 1989
Background
.Action by Council:
Endorse
odif i e
Rejected .
Date
Sergeant Joseph Zappa retired from the Maplewood Police Department on
May 31, 1989, creating. a vacancy in the department.
Due to the . ncreased activity of the police department-and the increase
in the demands for our services, we are in need of filling the vacant
Police officer position as soon as possible. Once a candidate has been
selected and approved, it will still take - between six and ten weeks before
that individual i s able to perform police officer duties on his/her own,
n .
Recommendation
I am recommending that approval 1 be given ven to fill •
P 9 the current vacancy in
the Maplewood Police Department,
Action Required
For your review and approval and f to the City Council g y u cil for their
review and approval.
KVC: j s
i
• � f
AGENDA ITEM
r>
AGENDA REPORT AOtiO►n by Council
T"o M City Manager Endorsed
Med.ifi ed
FROM: Ass istant City Engineer Rejected
Dat e ____
S UBJECT: Brooks Avenue, Hazelwood to Germain Wa ter Main
Schedule Assessment Hearing
DATE ,dune 19, 1989
Bids f or this project w i 1 1 -be received on Friday, June 24, 1989 .
An assessment roll will be computed and presented to the counc i l
a t the June 26 , 1989, meeting of acceptable to the council.
The attached resolutions schedule an assessment hearing for July
2.4 , 1989
BAI
is
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL.
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have received bids
f or the improvement of Brooks Avenue, Hazelwood to Germain Wateir%
Main, City Project 88-08,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
or SLtch improvement aga i'nst every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard
to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy
of such proposed assessment . i n the city office for inspection,
FURTHER, the clerk shal 1 , upon completion of such proposed
assessment notify the council thereof .
RESOLUTION
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction
. of the, council,prepared an aesessment roll for the construction
of Brooks Avenue, Hazelwood to Germain Water Main, City Project
8E3-~08, and the said assessment is on file* in the office of the
city clerks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
/iAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
^
l. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of July, 1989,
at the city hall at 7 p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment
and such, time and place all persons owning property affected
by such improvement wil1 be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment"
`
2" The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of
the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the
official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and
to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said
assessment,
`3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and
place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area
tobe assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with
the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered.
• v
i
Q � !
AGENDA i 1 EM
Action b ouarat u _
AGENDA REPORT
Endorsed.
TO: City !Manage Modified
Re J ected...�
. FROM:. Assistant City Engineer N Dat
SUBJECT » Keller Park Road C Water Main, Project 88 -1 (*)
Schedule Assessment Hearing
DATE: June 19, 1989
B ids f or thi project w i 1 l be received on Friday , June 24, 1989 .
An assessment roll w i l l be competed and presented to the council
at the ..dune 26, 1989, meet- i ng of acceptable to the council,
The attached resolutions schedule an assessment hearing for
July 24, 198981
BAI
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
`
WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have received bids
fmr the improvement of Keller Parkway/ County Road C Water Main,
City Project 88�10.
` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED DY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard
1:o cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy
of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection.
' FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed
assessment notify the council thereof.
' -
- ` RESOLUTION
, ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING
WHEREAS, the clerk an the .engineer have at th di of the counci1, preparedan assessment roll f'o e r t| direction
' ��f.Ke?ler Parkway/County Road C Water Main City the construction
and the said assessment i'` « y Project 88~~10
clerk, s, on file in the offic*e of the city
~=~�'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT-RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA:
� l. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of Jul �9
at ths city h�ll �t 7:10 p~ m^ to y' 89
a«»im 'ssment and at such time upon such proposed -
aff� �ted b me an d place all �persons owning propert y
hN�� withy such improvement will be given an opportunity to be
�n'u re�ersnce to such assessment.
'. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to '
the hearing on the proposed assessment t b cause a notice of
offici�«l newspaper, at leas' two week prior oe publ 1shed in the
to mail notices to the � s to the hearing, and
t
� ,.~ e owners of all property affected by said
assessment.
3" The notice of hearing shall state the date time d
place of h�arin� the �e��ral nature of th e i v ��n
to be assessed, that the proposed assessment improvement the area
the clerk � and that written or oral objection s wz/ ro/|lzs on file with
' be considered.
/
AGENDA ITEM
�ot� � ~^
AGENDA REPORT �u�� ��
TO: City Manager Endorse
Modif��
FROM: Assistant City Engineer PLeJ ecte
D�±
SUBJECT Smuthlawm Avenue, Beam to County Road D
Project 85-17, Change Order [Y
DATE: June 19, 1989
Attached is a letter from the project engineer explaining the
circumstances of the subject change order in the amount, of
*26,920. The unit prices for Select Granu1ar Borrow and Core
E which comprise the majority of the cost, are the same
as the bid prices. The work covered by the change order is
currently complete.
tl Attached is a resolution to modify the
construction contract.
BAI
jc
Attachments
y'
,
ENGINEERS ■ ARCHITECTS N PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484 -0272
TO: KEN RAIDER AND BRUCE IRISH
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
FROM: KEN MEISTER
DATE: JUNE 9 1 1989
SUBJECT.* CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
SOUTHLAWN AVENUE S.A.P. 138- 117 -01
SEH FILE NO. 88082
Unsuitable and wet. soils were encountered from Sta. 5 +80 to the
perimeter road under the existing bituminous surface. Also, the
soil from Sta. 11 +25 began deflecting under truck traffic.
Loren Braun from Twin City Testing was contacted and he visited
the site to observe the soils (see attached report).
Loren recommended that a 2 foot subcut be performed and select
granular borrow be used for backfilling the subcut. He also
recommended installing perforated drain pipe, so that water would
not become trapped in the subgrade.
be - lags had been drilled at Sta. 5 +50 and Sta. 12 +00.
The soils report did not indicate that this soil had to be
subcut.
In preparing the plans and specifications, we assumed a minimal
amount (500 C.Y.) would have to be removed. However, an
additional amount of approximately 2800 C.Y. will have to be
removed which is why change order No. 3 is necessary.
KRM /cmb
C
SHORT ELLIOTT ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS,
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN
CHAN ORDER
ENGINEER51 ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS
222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272
Irl�M
C ity of Maplewood
DATE June 7, 1989
o
OWNERS P R O JECT NO 85-17 S . A . P . 188 - 117.01 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
PROJECT DES RIP I N Utility & St. Im provem ents on SEH FILE NO. 88082
TOTAL
out awn Ave, and Furness Parkway
EST, PRICE
PARTICIPATING
The following changes shall be made to the contract docu
$16,520.00
UNIT
8 , 400.00
ITEM UNIT
EST. TY.
PRICE
Description:
---- --
�.
2105.522
Select Granular Burrow (C,V.) C.Y.
2
5.90
2116.50.1
Core Excavation C.Y.
2
3.00
2502.501
4" PE Corr. Perf, Pi pe Drain L.F.
400
5.00
TOTAL
SAP 138-117-0
EST, PRICE
PARTICIPATING
$
$16,520.00
8
8 , 400.00
2
2 , 000.00
�L0 .pL0
Purpose of Change Order:
Unsuitable soils were encountered from sta. 5 + 80 to the perimeter road and
sta. 11 + 25 to sta. 13 + 75. The unsuitable soils are to be removed and granular
material added.
Basis of Cost. 0 ACto Xj Estimated
Attachments (list supporting documents)
Contract status
Original Contract
Net Change e Prior C.O.'s 1 to 2
Change this C.O.
Revised Contract
Time
Cost
$442 9 947.02
7 039.95
26,920.00
$476
Recommended for Approval. Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. By < < • �r
Agreed to by Contractor:
BY-
Title
Distribution
Approved for Owner:
M
Ely MN/DOT istric 9 State Aid Engineer
Contractor 2 Owner I Project Representative I
SEH Office I
SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS,
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has
he retofore ordered made Improvement Project 85-17, South lawn
Avenue, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessar .and expedient that said
contract be mod l+ied and designated as Improvement P 85-17
Change Order 3..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT''RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPL.EWOO # MINNESOTA that the ma and cit clerk are hereb
authorized and di to modif the existing contract b
executing said Change Order 3.
`
~
/ .
��
��
��_ '
AGENDA I ��
Action by Ooonoi v
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager Endorsed
Modif ied______`
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Re1ected�_�~��
Dat
SUBJECT Gervais Avenue, Project 88-14-Change Orders 1 - 4 �
DATE: June 19, 1989
Attached is a letter from the project engineer giving the nature
and amount of each of the four change orders for Gervais Avenue.
Change Order 1 was mandated by the St. Paul Water Utility. The
mandated changes are contrary to the recommendation of the
project engineer for cost effectip�ness
pro `
Change Order 2 is necessary
property owner an the south
the railroad embankment did
easement. The fill section
guardrail and additional er
required.
for traffic safety purposes. The
side of Gervais Avenue adjacent to
not agree to the proposed slope
was reduced accordingly. A cable
osion control measures are now
Change Order 3 is mandated by the St. Paul Water UtlYity. It is
contrary to the recommendation of the project engineer in terms
of cost effectiveness. If approved, Change Order 3 would have to
be financed from the hydrant fund. It is not eligible for state
aid funding since it already had "excessive" cover.
The practice of running separate connections for the domestic
supply and fire protection all the way to the main in the street,
as reflected in Change Order 4, is contrary to commonly accepted
installation of a single service branched inside the building~
If approved, it is recommended that the staff be directed to make
recovery of this cost from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation if possible.
A resolution is attached to authorized modification of the
construction contract. Work on the project has been temporarily
suspended until resolution of Change Orders 3 and 4 is made.
BAI
ic
Attachments
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
.June 15, 1989
Mr. Bruce Irish
City of Maplewood
1830 East Wrunfiy Road B
Map) ewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Change Orders No. 1, 2, 3 & 4
Gerva i s Avenue
Maplewood, Minnesota
Commission No. 9279
Dear W. Irish:
2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -1893
612/292 -4400
FAX 612/292 -0083
The fol lawtng is a review of the Change Orders needed for this protect.
This change was outlined In the St. Paul Water Department's review letter
of January 23, 1989. The new grade over the existing watermai n at Station
9 +00 w i l I be in excess of 7-1/2'. Because the street Increased the cover
over this watermain, this change order should be eligible for state aid
funds. The cost to relay this waterma i n Is as follows,
54 L F 8" DIP @ $2 0.0 0/ FT = $1.
2 EA Connect to EX Waterma i n @ $125.00/EA = $ 250.00
695 LB MJ Fittings @ $1.83/LB = $1,271.85
1 EA Air Vent @ $375/EA = -.$- 3, 500
To +a l rn c Ch ange Order No. 1 $2,976085
Because the City was unable to obtain the necessary slope easements, Mange
Order No. 2 Is needed to provide for slope stabilization, erosion control,
and guard rail. This change order Is state aid e l i g i b l e ,
400 SY Te nsa r G eogr i d SS-1
Slope Reinforcement @ $5.00 = $2,000.00
500 SY Wood Fiber Blanket @ $2.75/ SY = $1,375900
350 LF 3 -Cable Guard Rail @ $10.00 /LF = $3
2 EA End Anchor Assembly @ $285.00/EA = 570�00
Total Estimated Cost Change Order No. 2 $70445.00
Mr . Bruce 1 r I sh `
J une 15, 1989
Pa ge 2
Th Is change I s .needed because w h I I e excav a ti ng f or the water sery Ice to the
MnDOT building, we discovered that the watermai n had 12 of cover. The St.
Paul Water Ut1 I tty has determined that the watermain must be raised from
Station 11+50 t o 13+001, T h Is change order w i I I not be state aid e l i g i b l e
because the new street does not increase the amount of cover over the
w a terma i n.
150 LF 16" DIP @ $34.0 0/ FT = $5.4100000
21 LF 6" D I P @ $25.00 /FT = $ 525.00
2 EA 16" B.F. Valve @ $1,750.00/EA = $3
1 EA.6" Gate Valve @ $390.00 /EA = $ 390.00
1 EA Remove /Re i nstal I Hydrant @ $650.00 /EA = $ 650000
2 EA Connect to Exi st. WM @ $500.00 /EA = $1
2,000 LB MJ DIP Fittings @ $1950/LB = $3 0 00
Total Esti Cost Change Order No. 3 $14 0 165.00
Ch e Order ,j, Q,_,,,4
This change order adds a 4" water sere Ice to the MnDOT but t di ng at Chet r
request. A I so, a 16X8 tee and 8 G. V. w i i I naw be t o sta I I ed w t th th e
reiatd 16" Natermatn for service to their property in i ieu of the planned
16X8 wet tap.
50 LF 4" DIP @ $20.00 /FT = $1,000.00
1 EA 4" G.V. @ $350.00 /EA = $ 350.00
1 EA 8" G.V. @ $450.00 /EA = $ 450.00
50 LF 8" D i P @ $20.00 /FT = $1
1 LB MJ DIP Fittings @ $1.50 /LB = $1,8750
Total Estimated Cost Change Order No. 4 $4,675.00
Please let us know when we may proceed with construction on these Items.
S I ncerel y,
.Larry D. Rohrer, P. E.
LOB /mha
RESOLUTION
L11RECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
.WHEREAS, the Cit Council o+ Maplewood, Minnesota has
hereto+ore ordered made Improvement Project 88-14, Gervals
Avenue, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it.isi. now necessar a nd exped'ient that said
contract be mod i+i,ed and designated as Improvement Project 88-14
Change Orders 1 through 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the ma and cit clerk are hereb
a uthorized and directed to modif the existing contract b
executing said Change Orders I through 4.
�
Action by Council:
'EM.----_``
Endor ________
`
Mo dified,
_TOO City Manager `
FROM:. mental Health Official ' Re
SUBJECT BRUSH DISPOSAL DAY
DATE junea15 1989
^
INTRODUCTION '
A/`�report was requested from a council member on the feasibility of
the City sponsoring a brush disposal day this year.
D ISCUSSION '
-,'
There is a need for this type of disposal , but there are numerous _
problems in setting up such a project this year.
'
S ite
-
In Because of the mess involved and the space needed for
storage, park property and open space would not be suitablew.
'
2_ The compost sites are already overcrowded and our compost
site would not be available because of lease restrictions.
3 . When the compost site was developed, acomplete survey of
City properties was done. The only other possible location
was the site of the old City garage on Frost and Clarence.
This site is grown up with brush and trees, but it probably
could be made to work. M\/ concern is that we would have
' - brush dumped there and in Maplewood Foods' parking lot a
week before and for several weeks afterward. I say this
from my experience at the compost site.
4. There is no room in the public works yard, and we already
have a large pile of chips that we cannot get rid of.
Cost
1. The exact cost of the project would depend on thin- «olume
of brush received. Neither of these can be determined.
2" Just to be able to associate a cost with a given volume, _
Bil, Cass , MiV,.e Kane and I used a volume of 20 truckloads o+
chips and come up with approximately $5,000 for labor,
equipment and disposal.
3. Disposal seems to be another problem; the Anoka County
landfill and the NSP garbage plant will not accept them,
and the Pine Bend landfill will only take small amounts to
U be composted.
4._ They cannot be put in the City's compost pile because they
will not rot fast enough.
5° I tried, but could not get, any type of estimate of cost on
having the brush chipped and removed by a tree service.
They will only bid by the job.
6. The 20 truck loads of chips mentioned above would take a
'three-man crew five days. Bill Cass indicated that the
Street Department does have the extra manpower for this,
nor do I have the extra time to organize it
7. Since we cannot estimate what the cost would be, the Council
would have to agree to fund the project, whatever the cost.
All things considered, it does not appear practical to try and do
this on a "one time" basis. If we are to provide for brush
disposal, it should be on a permanent basis with a permanent site
that can be controlled like the compost site. One note of
encouragement is that the County hopes to have a disposal site on
line by next spring.
Take no action on a City-sponsored "brush day" this year, but
send a letter to Ramsey County supporting a permanent brush .14
disposal site.
jl
cc:: Bill Cass
Ken Haider
MEM.BRUSH
/
Action by Council:*
, '°-'"°'`'"`""'' Endorse
_ �o���le�_______
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development Rejaote
'SUBJECT: Variances and Variations Dat
%]ATEw . June 19, 1989 '
Cou Jul asked at the last meeting -for an �pXanation`
of ��e difference between variances and variations +rom the Code.
Both variances and variations are deviations from the requirements
of the Code~ A deviation from the coning chapter is called a
var A deviation from the subdivision chapter is called a
variation. There are separate findings required to approve each
one. - The findings for a variance are determined by State law.
Section 367,10, subdivision 6(2) of State law requires that the
- following +indings be made before a variance to the zoning chapter
can be gran ted:
1, Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property under consideration"
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a
variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable
use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The
plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his
property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if
granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue
hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the ordinance.
There are no findings required in State law to approve a variation
From the subdivision chapter. In this case, findings are
determined by City Code and are found in section 30-11:
"The planning commission may recommend variations from the
requirements of this chapter (subdivisions) in specific cases
which, in its opinion, do not affect the general plan or the
intent of this chapter. Such recommendations shall be
commun icated to the council in writing, substantiating the
m^"tommended variations. The council may approve variations from
th of this chapter in specific cases which, in its
o do not adversely affect the plan and spirit of this
If Council finds the use of these two terms confusing, they should
initiate s code amendment to change the word "variations" in
section 30-11 to "variances". The difference in names is only
important in drawing attention to the fact that different findings
are required for each. As you can see from the above, the
findings for a variation from the subdivision chapter are much
less stringent than +or a variance +rom the zoning chapter^.
Council may wish to have one set o + findings for both. In t h i s
case, they should initiate an amendment of section 30-11 to
require the carne +indings +ors a variation from the subdivision
chapter as are requ, i red for, a variance from the zoning chapter.
EM06
* -
MEMORANDUM Aotion by Cozuzollon
'
TO: CiLy Manager Modlf�e�~_�____
Re* eoted....__�__~
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Dat
SUBJECT:Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan--Supplementary Report
DATE: June 19, 1989
Introduction
The subject report is hereby transmitted for your review and
approval,,
The "Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan" is a separate document
but still is part of the overall Maplewood Com-rehensive Plan..
The `Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan" was prepared by a consul_
tant in 1980. The general policies of the "Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan" were approved by the Metropolitan Council .
However, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission review found
that the specific technical data required to implement the plan
was not sufficient. Maplewood, therefore, withdrew the request
for Metropolitan Council review until the additional information
was incorporated into the plan.
The lapse in supplying the requested additional information has
prompted the Metropolitan Council to refuse to consider revision
of the population density limitations of the comprehensive plan.
Furthermore, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has
indicated that approval of sanitary sewer extensions for
subdivisions may not be forthcoming without an approved compre-
hensive sanitary sewer plan'~ This would result in an effective
moratorium on development since the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency will not give the legally required permit for sewer
extensi ±he metropolitan area without a satisfactory review
from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
This report supplements the "1980 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer
Plan" and provides the additional requested technical in+oraa-
tion. The timing of construction of major trunk facilities is
updated.
The majority of the report relates to refinement of the bound-
aries of areas tributary to discharge points into the Metropol-
itan Waste Control Commission system of interceptor sanitary
sewers or another municipality's sewer system. Projections of
sewage flow are made based on the current density conversion
tables as recognized by the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan
Council's population projections.
D
Sanitary Sewer Plan 2 June 1 1989
The only impact on the comprehensive sewer plan of the reduced
number ofpeople per unit in the Density Conversion Table adopted
by the city council on March 24, 1986 relates to flow projec-
tions. This change increases the sewage +low projection rates.
Attached is the revised table from the "Comprehensive Sanitary
Sewer Plan," Table 3-4 Residential Equivalent Connection Projec-
tions with Revised Density Conversion.
In the review of the draft of the "Supplementary Report," the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission requested information to
verify compliance with the policies and goals of the Metropolitan
Devel-o ment Guide - Water Resources Mana Since the issues
relating to on-site system usage have significant planning policy
implications, it is requested that particular scrutiny of Chapter
4, `On-Site Systems" be made~ It should be noted that the
environmental health o+ficial has requested the city clerk to
revise the MPCA Individual Sewage Treatment System Standards to
the 1989 designation as Chapter 7080 +rom 6MCAR4.8040.
Recommendation
I<: is recommended that the report be reviewed and approved as a
revision to the Maplewood Com rehensive Plan,
BAI
jw
Attachment
TABLE 3 -4 - REC PROJECTIONS WITH REVISED DENSITY CONVERSION
BISTRICT
TOTAL REC
TO RAC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL . REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC TOTAL REC
TOTAL REEC
TOTAL ULT
NLAER
1989
1X90
1951
1992
1995
2w
2005
2015
REC UNITS
1
398
406
418
427
456
503
551
599
646
1593
2
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
3
12
14
15
16
20
26
33
39
45
171
4
771
773
774
775
779
785
792
798
804
931
5
124
124
124
1.24
124
125
125
125
126
132
6
156
156
1,57
157
159
162
166
169
172
233.
7
317
alt&
318
3
322
326
330
334
338
421
8
444
445
4va
44
4w
454
459
464
468
561
9
60
63
66
fa.
7
!
106
121
135
424
18
4
5
5
5
6
8
10
11
13
45
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
19
.12
21
21
21
21
21
a
22
22
23
28
13
10
11
11
12
13
15
16
18
20
14
215
218
2212
223
2'31
244
257
269
ME
537
15
64
72
79
86
106
141
175
289
244
928
16
24
25
26
26
29
33
38
42
46
133
17
33
34
34
35
37
41
45
49
53
129
18
82
85
88
92
101
117
132
148
164
475
19
34
36
37
36
42
49
55
62
69
200
20
208
208
209
210
212
216
219
223
226
298
21
187
187
M
187
186
188
188
189
189
196
22
1623
1E51
1677
1703
1781
1910
2M
2170
2300
4878
23
240
246
250
255
269
293
317
341
364
837
24
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
25
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
26
1627
1632
1637
1642
1658
1683
1709
1734
1759
2265
27
803
811
819
826
849
886
924
%1
999
1745
28
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
c9
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
4E
30
172
173
174
175
177
182
186
190
195
28E
31
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
e5
32
481
483,
404
406
418
417
424
431
439
581
33
32
33
33
33
35
36
38
40
42
7S
34
323
333
' 341
350
376
420
464
508
551
1422
35
66
67
67
67
68
69
71
72
73
101
36
11
it
11
12
14
17
20
23
27
91
37
983
992
1001•
1009
1835
1077
1120
1162
1205
2045
38
365
387
369
370
375
383
391
399
487
565
39
170
170
170
170
176
170
178
170
170
171
40
289
290
291
292
295
300
305
311
316
41E
41
161
164
167
170
179
194
209
225
240
54E
42
4725
4729
4733
4737
4748
4766
4785
4803
4822
518E
43
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
c
44
133
138
141
145
157
176
195
214
233
61
45
149
149
149
149
149
149
149
149
149
15k
46
79
79
88
81
83
87
91
94
98
172
47
457
462
468
473
488
514
548
566
592
1102
48
34
34
35
35
35
36
37
38
39
5{
49
126
127
127
128
129
132
134
136
139
18%,
50
286
295
383
311
336
378
419
461
503
132`
51
0
0
0
0
40
50
60
69
79
274
52
1
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
34
TABLE 3 -4 - REC
PROJECTIONS WITH REVISED DENSITY CONVERSION
'DISTRICT
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL. REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL REC
TOTAL L.I
NUMBER
1989
1996
1991
1992
1995
2M
2805
2810
2815
REC tlNI TEE
53
6
8
1®
12
18
27
37
47
56
24E
54
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
18
18
21
55
5
5
5
5
6
6
7
a
8
29.
56
53
58
63
68.,
82
185
129
152
175
649
57
4
9
13
18
31
53
75
97
119
55S
58
8
8
8
8
1
1
2
?
3
1j
59
46
48
40
46
48
48
48
49
40
4
60
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
61
19
19
19
19
28
28
28
21
21
2E
62
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.1
63
150
156
158
158
150
158
150
150
150
159
64
8
8
:65
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
If
66
5
5
5
6
6
7
8
9
9
2l
67
6
0
8
8
1
1
2
3
3
14
68
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
69
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
. S
7
If -
78
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
2f
71
N---- M--
6
N--- N-----
6
M - - - - --
7
- r N--------
7
-----
7
-------
8
-- N --------------
9
��-
10
NN- ��N��1--- ��-
11
-N
31
NN-i
N---
N-----
TOTAL
--------
16978
- ---
17138
17268
--- NN------- M------
17407
- ��---
17865
N- N-- NN--
18569
NN-- -- --
19274
N---
19996
N----- NN--
20700
M- MN - -Y
34764
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING THE "COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY SEWED' PLAN--
SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT" AS PART O
THE COMPREHENSI VE PLAN
WHEREAS, the city engineer has presented a su l ementar
report dated June 1989 to the "1980 pP �
and
1980 Comprehensive Sewer Plan
,
WHEREAS, the "Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan" is a part
comp rehensive v R t
of the overall com
p e plan .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CP
MAPL.EWOOD , MINNESOTA, as follows
The "Maplewood Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Report" dated ,dune 1989 . is
approved and i s adopted a pant of the
overall comprehen plan,
MEMORANDUM Action b Cou ncil:
Endo rs e
TO: Cit Manager
Modif ied
FROM: Director of Commu R
nit Development ....._,
Re ected........,
SUBJECT: R-3 District
DATE: ma 1. 1989 Date
The Ci Council on April 20, re that part of the Cit
code be presented for review at each Council meeting, starting
with the R-3., Multiple dwelling, district. The R-3 . district is
attached, along with a zoning map showing the existing R-3
districts, An inventor of existing and planned R-3 zones is
also inctudeds An proposed changes to the code should be
referred to the Planning Commission.
kd/R-3.mem
Attachments
is R-3 District
2. R-3 Inventor
3 v Zoning Map (separate attachment)
?ArTING 4 36 -108
DIVISION 5. R -3 RESIDENCE DISTRICT
(MULTIPLE DWELLING)
Sec. 36 -106. Multiple dwelling classifications.
Multiple dwelling struct.um permitted within an R-3 Residence
District shall be classified as follows:
Classification Structure containing
R•3A .............. 3* 17 unit
R -3B .............. More than 17 units
R -3C .............. Townhouses, as defined in section 36-
124 of this division.
(Ord. No. 245, § 906,10 -3 -68)
Sec. 36 -107. Definition.
For the P urposes of this division, "apartments" are defined as W
multiple dwelling structures consisting of at least three (3) attached
dwelling units having entrances from common hallways. (Ord. No.
465 § 906.0009 4- 19 -79)
Cross reference —Rules of construction and definitions generally, 11-41 et seq. ,'
j
Sec. '36 -108. R-3 districts— Permitted uses. G • tT • 0
In a -3 Residence District (Multiple Dwelling), unl other -
wise P rovi in this chapter, no building or land shal ereafter be
erected or stru urally altered, except for one or a of the follow-
_ ,
ing uses;
(1) All uses permit in divisions 3 an of this article, R -1 and
R -2 Residence Dis . ts, except ngle- family dwellings, du-
plexes or double bung ess specifically authorized by
the city council.
(2) Multiple dwellings, set forth ' sections 36 -118 through
36.120 of this divison (R -3A), sectio 36 -121 through 36 -123
of this division AA -3B), and sections -124 and 36 -125 of
this division 10C), setting forth the cl 'fications of such
dwellings by size and by type. Any privilege conduct busi-
ness in multiple dwelling structures shall be li ited to such
business use as the council may authorize at i time of
approval of construction plans and specifications.
j
Supp. No. 4 2223
�j/'ct reww�re �C Z 7
Residence District (single dwelli
Ya ccessor i ng)
y
use h permitted i n an R - 1 Re e R -E Residence Estate District, except:
is rmltted n t
{ 1 J sed car lots.
• includin the sale of used
Th e reckin of automobiles or trucks 8 sale.
of
Th g
cars.
� R -E District.
• e R -1 district is prohibited in the
An prohibited us in the �
Any
. _ D� ��,in
Section 5. Sect on 3 6 (R 2, D 1 e S District) is hereby amended
as follows:
Section 36 -86. Uses*
nI ri permitted
in the R -2 Residence
a. Permitted uses. The o }� ses p
District are as follows:
1. Any permitted us in the R - istrict.
_ 2, Double dwelli gs•
• ermitted by conditional
b.
Conditional u s. The following uses -may P
use permit:
• ditional use permit the R -1 District.
1. A a permitted b} con
Section b. Se tlon 3 is added to the R - District:.
.
Minimum floor oor areas .
Sec. 36-94. �
• r District dwelling
The each R - Residence inlmum habitable floor area fo eighty (580) square .feet er �f-
• least: five hundred e P
un shall be at lea red fort (740) square feet per
• c• or one- bedroom unit; seven hued y t hree-bedroom
f cien y square feet per
unit e hundred'sixt} (860) sq
k•o bedroom � S
• e thousand forty (1 square feet p er four bedroom unite
• unit , on
• Dist rict) is hereby amended
• (R-3 Multi ing Dist ) Section 7. Section 36 108 le Dwell
P
as follows:
Sec. 36 - 108. Uses.
• uses permitted in the R - District are as
a , Permitted uses. The only P
follows:
1 Multiple dwellings, s, inc3uding double dwellings.
• - family
2, Any use permitted in the R -1 District, except single
y
dwellings.
• may permitted by conditional � be
b . Conditional uses* .The following uses } P
use permit
it in the R -1 District
An use permitted by conditional v see perm
1. Y
2. Boarding or lodging ouse, except a hotel or motel.
g
3, Nursing home.
•
c. Prohibited use: a single - family dwelling*
n.
Se t• on S. Sec.
17 -21 to 17 -25 (Home occupations) is hereby amend as
fo1 ws:
Secti 17 -21. License requirementse
s shall requir a license if any of a fol owing
•. (a) ome occ u pa t � on q
C TCU
mstances would occur more than 30 days each y ar:
i. P Y
to ment of a nonresident in the home occ ation.
2. Customers visiting the premises.
3, Manuf&pture of products on the premises
one ve
hicle associated wit the home occupation which
4. More tha is classif d as a light commercial ehicle.
�n the
home occ ation, and parked on the
5 A vehicle(s) ed
arter ton payload capacity*
' which exceeds a ca p acit y* prem
premises,
� to but not
requiting a licen shall be subject ,
(b) Rome occupations
limited to, the followi g require nts:
1. No traffic is shall be g \nerat'e'd by a home occupation in greater
�
volumes than would normal be expec ted in a residential " off - street parking shall not ex-
neighborhood. The need �:,
ceed more
than three off- §treet parking spaces for home oc cupa-
at an iven time, n addition to the parking spaces re-
tion S 8
quired by the residents.
• n
nonresident employee shall be allowed • to work o
2. No more than one n ,
• ident em to ees who work off premises may be
the premises. Nonrks , • p m to •ee is arking
wed to visit O pre ises. I an on -site e p y P . alt m heir vehicles on -site
on -site, off -site employees shall t leave t
• •te employee veh1 le parked on -site, one off-
If there is no on
site employee vehicle may be parked o -site.
3, No vehicle
• socia ted with the home occ pation, including customers
a�
1 be p arked on the st et or block sid ewalks or
or employees,
sha ll . p
Pri vate vehicles used y the residents shall not
public easements i
be included in this requirement.
no more than twenty ( ) percent of each
4. An area equivalent to e, shall be
level /of the house, including the basement an garage,
used in the conduct of a home occupation.
/ o change visible off premises in he outside
5, There shall ben g t would 'ndicate the
ap pearance earance of the building or premises that
onduct of a home occupation, other than one sign m eting the
f equirements of the City sign code.
1 56 -108 MAPLEWOOD CODE
(3) Cfu b*� lodges, fraternity and sorority ho s which do not
offer a lic accammadatrons.
(4) Boarding a lodging houses.
(5) The following s pursuant special use permit granted by
the council on a lication nd hearing -as provided in article
III of this chapter:
a. Hos P hale, clip' nursing homes and other buildings
used for tree ent human ailments.
b. Philanthrpiic and ch itable institutions.
c. Any 2apter r use enumer ed or specified in article .III of
this relating to special use permits. (Code 1965,
§ 906.010; Ord. No. 245, § 1 2 ) JO -3 -68)
Sec. 56 - 109. Same — Off - street parking.
Each multiple - dwelling unit in the city shall have off - street
parking space. Parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not
part of, the driveways or maneuvering space necessary to the
parking areas serving such multiple dwelling. All parking spac-
es, driveways and other parts of the parking facilities shall be
dust free and shall be surfaced with concrete or blacktop. Park-
ing requirements shall be as follows:
(1) An open parking stall shall be a minimum distance of
fifteen (15) feet from a dwelling unit window and five (5)
feet from any side or rear property line.
(2) Parking stalls may not be located within fifteen (15) feet of
a street right-of-way, unless section 36 -22 applies.
(3) Where a garage or carport opens to a public street, the
width of the driveway onto that public street shall not
exceed twenty -four (24) feet in width, and in no event shall
a series of garages open directly to that street. Where a
series of garages face each other on a private road, the
minimum width separating garages shall be thirty (30)
feet in order to provide visibility in backing out or turning
around.
(4) Parking shall also be in accordance with section 36 -22.
(Code 1965, § 906.070; Ord. No. 231, § 1, 10 -5 -67; Ord. No.
Supp. No. 4 2224
ZONING 136-111
245, § 4 t§ 906.030), 10 -3 -6$; Ord. No. 5,55, § 2, 11- 28 -83;
Ord. No. 585, § 5, 8-26 -85)
Sec. 36 -110. Same— Indoor storage spaces.
A minimum of one hundred twenty (120) cubic feet of storage
.
spas ,
e in addition to normal closet space, shall be made available
for each ch multi le- dwelling unit. Such storage space shall be lo-
cated in the same building as the dwelling unit or in the garage,
but
shall not be considered as part of the habitable area of a
in unit. If located in the garage, it shall be enclosed and
dwelling §
shall not be part of the automobile parking area. (Ord. No. 245,
5 (§ 906-040),10-3-68; Ord. No. 577, § 1, 1-28-85)
Sec. 36 -111. Same — Exterior surfaces.
P e)
All multiple dwellings in the city shall be designed and con-
s
trusted to have the equivalent of a front on each exterior surface.
$upp. No. 4
2224.1
ZONING 1 36- 114
{bj All accessory or ancillary buildings to multiple dwellings in
the city, including garages and carports, shall be designed and con-
. Y
structed to have su the same exterior surface as the prin-
ci P al use building. (Ord. No. 245, 6 (§ 906.050),10 -3 -68)
Sec. 36 -112. Same - Accoustical controls*
In all multiple le dwellin buildings in the city, the following stand -
ards of accoustical control shall apply:
plumbing g
All lumbin serving each unit shall be separated from other
units by a room, closet, corridor or sound barrier.
(2) party partitions s and floor systems shall be of a type suffi-
cient to accomplish a loss in sound transmissio n of not less
than fifty (50) decibels determined by averaging the loss at
frequencies of 125, 250, 350, 500, 700, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000
cycles. Corridor partitions shall be capable of accomplishing
a loss in sound transmissions of not less than forty -five (45)
decibels similarly determined. (Ord. No. 245, § 7 (§ 906.070),
10 -3 -68)
.Seca 36 -113. Same— Garbage, refuse, etc., containers.
fuse rubbish and garbage containers serving multiple dwell
. All refuse, r city shall be placed at the rear of the remises. In no
ings in the ci p
event shall such containers be placed next to the street or curb, nor
shall the Y be placed so as to interfere with the use of adjoining g
prop erty erty or to cause a nuisance or annoyance to adjoining property
occupants. Such containers shall be covered and maintained so as to
be inaccessible to insects, vermin or animals, and shall be screened
�
so as not to be visible from eye -level height. (Ord. No. 245, § 9 ( §
906.080),10 -3 -68)
Sec. 36-114. Same— Density credits.
All multiple dwelling structures constructed in the city are
sub'ect to minimum area and maximum density standards as set
forth in sections of this chapter relating to density and area
rq
e uirements. The following credits to such standards shall be
allowed as follows:
Supp. No. 2. 2225
136-114 MAPLEWOOD CODE
1) Underground p The net acreage for calculating den-
city may be increased by three h square
( hundred (300) feet for each parking space that is provided under the principal
use structure, or in some other manner underground, which
u
will thereby permit use of the grade level outside the build-
in g, or above such underground space, for other building,
g
parking, open yard or recreation space.
Pa
(2) OPcn, s p a ce The net acreage for calculating density may be
increased by one hundred (100) square feet where twenty -
five (25) percent of the entire area is reserved in one area
for recreation play area, or for open land, water or ponding
areas subject to approval by the city council after consid-
eration by the community design review board.
() 3 Landscaping. The net acreage for calculating density may
be increased by one hundred (100) square feet for each
dwelling unit where one percent of the construction cost
(not including land cost) is allocated to the planting of
trees. This does not apply to the sodding or seeding of
.green areas.
() g 4 High rise. The net acreage for calculating density may be increased by one hundred (100) squar e feet for each dwell -
g
'n unit above three (3) stories. In order to qualify for this
1
credit, all floors must have elevator service. If this credit,
when combined with others available in paragraphs (1)
through (3) of this section, results in. a reduction of yard
or P arking space area below that otherwise required by
reason , of the dimensions and number of dwelling units in
the structure, then this credit shall not be allowed. (Ord.
No. 245, § 10 (§ 906.090), 10 -3 -68; Ord. No. 559, § 1, 12-
12 -83)
Sec. 36 -115. Same -- Certificate of occupancy.
Before any new multiple dwelling building in the city may be
Befo S .m
occupied by tenants, the owner or contra-or shall first obtain from
ct
the building inspector a certificate of occupancy, and such docu-
ment shall certify that all requirements, specifications, special treat -
nts screening, landscaping or any other prerequisite ordered or
re quired by the planning ' B nin commission or the council have been fully
re
provided or complied with and that all work is complete. Any unau-
thorized deviation or omission from city app roved plans shall pre -
supp. No. 2 2226
ZONING 136-119
vent the ies
uance of such certificate and thereby prevent the occu-
pay of. the Sts
ucture by any tenants or residents. (Ord. No. 245, §
11q 906.100),10.3 -6
Sec. 86 _ l l g. S ante— Sanitary sewer tequired; water
..
connectionse
shall be built in the city, unless a sanitary
No multiple dwelling
w r is available. The determination of availability
shall be made
se e
• engineer ursuant to demand requirements available or
by the city engin p
' made available. All apartments shall be connected .
capable of being m , No. 245, 12 (§ 906.110),
municipal $
tom al water when available. (Ord p
10-3-U)
Sec. 36 -11 7• . Radio tower, antenna and flagpole setbacks.
it residential districts, citizen band radio towers,
In all multifamily and flagpoles shall main -
amateur radio towers, television antennas a gp
tarn afive -foot setback 2
• ack from all property lines. (Ord. No. 392, § (§
906.120(a)),1- 15 -?
Sec. 36-118. 8. R -SA multiple dwellings — Generally.
All multiple are designated dwellings in the city having three (3) to seventeen
(1 ?) units
desi nated as R -3A multiple dwellings and are re-
• the isions of sections 36-118 to 36-120 of
quired to conform to P rov 10.3 -68)
this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 13 (§ 906.200)
Sec. 36-119. S a
me— Density and area requirements.
as otherwise modified or specified by terms
(a) Density. Except rl
of this chapter, or because of variances properly considered and
allowed, the building 11 con -
ildin site for any R -3A multiple dwelling shall
sist of an area of at least fifteen thousand, six hundred twenty -five
(15,625) square feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum
density permitted by the land use classification and people per unit
designated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan.
(b) Floor area.
The minimum habitable floor area for each
dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty
R -3A multiple g
(580) square feet per efficiency or one- bedroom unit; seven hun-
Bred forty (740) square e
are feet r two-bedroom unit, eight hundred
Sapp. No. 2 2227
36 -119 MAPLEWOOD CODE
sixty (860) square feet per three- bedroom unit; one thousand forty
,
(1,040) square feet per four - bedroom unit.
(c) Green area. At least thirty -five (35) percent of the R-3A
multiple dwelling site shall be. retained for and devoted to green
area; except that, adjustment may be allowed under certain circum-
stances in connection with the administration and application of
section 36 -114 of this division.
(d) Percentage for structure. The area covered by the R -3A build -
ing shall not exceed thirty -live (35) percent of the site area.
(e) Front yard requirements. EachR -3A multiple dwelling shall
have a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet in depth facing any
road or street. This setback shall apply to yards fronting on both
streets where the building is located on a corner lot.
(f) Side .and rear yard requirements.
(1) The minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for -
an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet.
(2) Parking spaces, garages, carports, or like structures shall
be set back no less than five (5) feet from a side or rear
property line and no less than fifteen (15) feet from a
public street right-of-way.
side and rear
W Setbacks increased The minimum front, s y
Lr ° setba for an R -3A multiple dwelling shall be increase o
d f to
- ive ?5 feet b the most restrictive of a follow-
l exceed sev ty f ( ) y
ing requireme where the lot abuts a farm resi ce, residen-
tial estate, single d ing, or double dwellin ping district:
(1) Building height: Th building setbacks shall be increased
two (2) feet for each on t i"uilding exceeds twenty -
five (25) feet in height.
(2) Exterior wall area: Where an exterio faces residen-
tially zoned property, the setback of the wall s in-
creased five (5) feet for eachi one thousand (1,000) square
feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000)
square feet.
(h) Height regulation. No R -3A multiple dwelling shall be erected
or structurally altered to exceed a height of thirty -six (36) feet from
Supp• No. 2 2228
ORDINANCE N0. 633
AN ORDINANCE AKENDI NG THE UQUIRDUMS FOR
SETBACKS TO RESIDENTIALLY -ZONM LAND .
THE MAPLEk 00D CITY ' COUNCI L HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
• - der landsca in
Sec on I . Subsection 36 27 (a) un P 8 and screening, is amended
as f of ws :
i (a) Ala caged area of not less than twenty (20) f ee,.t-- - fn width shall
be provi where:
(1 ) A non resz den
1 use abuts a re entially -zoned property*
dwelling u property zoned for single or double
(2) A multiple g
dwellings.
• his sub tion shall not apply
The require is of where the
t .
e 'a 1 -zoned roperty is be' used or is designated on
reside f s land use plan for a nonresi Y p t ial use*
t ity ,
t
Section 2 . Subsection 3 6 -119 (g), under the R -3 multiple district, is amended
as follows:
(g) Setbacks increased.
• ' and setbacks for an R -3A de and rear
(1) The minimum front, s� Y
multiple g
lti le dwellin shall be increased, not to exceed seventy -
f ive ( 75 feet, by the most restrictive of the following
)
require ,
ments where the lot abuts a farm residence, residen-
teal estate, single le dwelling, or double - dwelling zoning district:
•
a. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased
t o ( w feet for each one foot the bu exceeds tw enty-
five (25) feet in height*
area: where an exterior wall faces residentiall
b. Exterior wall
zoned property, ro erty, the setback of the wall shall
be increased f ive
(5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) square feet, or part
•
thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet.
• n which would encroach into a •
(2) A building addition required setback maN be approved by conditional use permit, if such
encroachment would be
cons with.surrounding property setbacks and screened in a man -
ner acceptable to the Community De n Review Board. At least 80%
•
of the addition shall be screened from abutting residential property.
'
(3) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply where the resi
' is being used or is designated on the City s
• dentially -zoned property g
land use plan for a nonresidential use.
. _ der the NC neighborhood Section 3. Subsection 36 130 (d), under commercial distinct, 8
is amended as follows:
_1-
ZONING 136-121
grade level measured from the front or street side of such building.
(Ord. No. 245, § 14 (1 906.210),10 -3-68; Ord. Igo. 448, § 1, 7- 20 -78;
Ord. No. 529, § 1, 11- 22-62; Ord. No. 561, § 2, 9- 12 -83)
Sec. 36 -120. Same —Two or more structures on one site.
Where two (2) or more R -3A multiple dwelling structures are to
be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall
apply to such buildings thirty -six (36) feet in height or less:
a No building shall be closer to another building than twice
the vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of
seventy -trio (72) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below)
(b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty-
six (36) feet measured from grade. Where both building ele-
vations are windowless, this requirement may be reduced by
one- third.. (Figure B below)
(c) No building shall be closer to another building than twenty
(20) feet measured from grade. (Figure C below)
IB
G
(Ord. No. 245, § 15 (§ 906.211),10 -3 -68)
Sec. 36 -121. R -3B multiple dwellings— Generally.
All multiple dwellings in the city having more than seventeen
17 units within one structure are designated as R -3B multiple
dwellings and are required to conform to the provisions of sections
36 -121 to 36 -123 of this division. (Ord. No. 245, § 16 Q 906.300),
10 -3 -68)
Supp. No. 2 2229
1 W -122 MAPLEWOOD CODE
Sec. 36 -122. Same -- Density and area requirements.
nsit . Except as otherwise, modified or specified by terms
(a) De y P rl idered and
of this chapter, or because of variances properly cons
allo wed, the building site for any R -3B multiple dwelling shall con -
gist of at least fifteen thousand, six hund red twenty-five (15,625) .
square feet. The density shall not exceed the maximum . density
le r unit deli
permitted by the land use classification and people per g
nated in the city's adopted comprehensive plan.
(b)
Minimum habitable fl oor area. The minimum floor area for
each R -3B multiple dwelling shall be at least: five hundred eighty
(� square
580 feet per efficiency or one - bedroom unit; seven hun-
dred forty (740) square feet per two- bedroo m unit; eight hundred
sixty (860) square feet per three - bedroom unit; one thousand forty
(1,040) square feet per four - bedroom unit.
land area. The minimum land area for any R -3B
(c) Minimum
multiple dwelling shall have at least one acre and the building
lot
shall have a width of not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet.
(d) Green area. At least thirty -five (35) percent of the site shall
be retained for, and devoted to, green area; except that, adjustment
may
be allowed under certain circumstances in connection with the
administration and application of section 36 -114 of this division.
(e) Building ground area. Building area may not cover more
than thirty -five (35) percent of the ground area.
(fl Front yard requirements. The minimum front yard setback
for an R -3B multiple dwelling shall be thirty (30) feet. This min-
imum setback shall be increased according to the provisions of
subsection 36- 119(8)• This setback shall not be required to be
greater than seventy -five (75) feet.
(g) Side and rear yard requirements.
tl)
The minimum side and rear yard setbacks for an R -3B
multiple dwelling shall be twenty (20) feet, unless the lot
abuts a farm residence, residential estate, single - dwelling
or double - dwelling zoning district, in such case, the mini-
mum setback shall be increased according to the provi-
sions of subsection 36- 119(8).
Supp No. 2 2230
ZONING 136-123
(2) Regardless of building height or external wall area, the
side and rear yard setbacks shall not be required to be
greater than seventy -five (75) feet.
(3) As provided in subsection 36- 119(f)(2).
8
(h) H ht ' rL No R•3B multiple dwelling shall be erected
or structurally altered to exceed a height of three (3) stories, or
thirty-five (35) feet, whichever is greater, pleasured from the
front or street side of such building, unless granted a special use
permit by the city council. (Ord. No. 245, § 17 0 906.310) 10 -3 -68;
Ord. No. 448, § 1 7- 20-78, Ord. No. 529,.§ 2, 11- 22 -82; Ord. No.
551, § 3, 9- 12 -83)
Sec. 36 -123. Same --Two or more structures on o - ue site.
Where two (2) or more R -3B multiple dwelling structures are to
be erected on a single site, the following special requirements shall
apply 1 to such buildings exceeding thirty -six (36) feet in height:
(a) No o shall be closer to another building than twice
the vertical height of the tallest building up to a maximum of
one hundred (100) feet measured from grade. (Figure A below)
(b) No building shall be closer to another building than thirty -
six (36) feet, which distance shall increase by one foot for
each two (2) feet of height in excess of thirty -six (36) feet, up
to a maximum distance of seventy -five (75) feet of separa-
tion measured from grade. where both building elevations
are windowless, this requirement may be reduced by Example: one -
third. E le: 44' high buildings, B = 40' of separation. (Fig-
. P
ure B below)
()
c No building shall be closer to another building than twenty
(20 ) feet, which distance shall increase by one foot for each
four (4) feet of height in excess of thirty -six (36) feet, up to a
maximum distance of forty (40) feet of separation measured
from g rade. Example: 44' high buildings, C = 22' of separa-
tion. (Figure C below)
Supp. No. 2 2231
136-123 MAPLEWOOD CODE
A� •
(Ord No. 245, § 18 Q 906.311),10 -3 -68)
Sec. 36 - 124. R - 3C townhouses — Generally.
For the purposes of this section, townhouses are defined as mul-
tip le dwelling structures consisting of at least three (3) attached
dwelling units, with no -one unit or major portion thereof directly
above or below any other unit. Such units are commonly described
as row houses, patio homes or quads and are required to conform to
the provisions of this section:
(1) Height regulation. Height regulations set forth in section
36- 119(h) of this division apply to all townhouses constructed
in the city, unless varied by - spec:.1 use permit.
(2) Area and fire requirements; No townhouse structure shat
be constructed in the city on an area of land less than four
thousand (4,000) square feet per dwelling unit. no more than
eight (8) dwelling units shall be included in a single struc-
ture, with separation of each unit by at least a one -hour fire
rated material and with every second dividing wall being
constructed of at least a two -hour fire rated material that
extends two (2) feet above the roof and two (2) feet out from
the front and back walls. The density shall not exceed the
maximum density permitted by the land use classification
and people per unit designated in the city's adopted com-
prehensive plan.
Supp. No. 2 2232
ZONING 1 36 - 125
nimutn habitable floor areal far each R•3C mul-
•
(6) Floor am The ON equsre
l be at : five h� eghtY
bedroom unit, seven h forty
feet per efficieIICy or one- ��,
square feet per two-bedroom unit; eight h undred
(740) �. m unit; nine hundred
(S60) square feet per ee- thr
forty (940) square feet per four- In unit.
(4) Common use area. Where more than one principal use struc-
ture is const on the same or contiguous lots, yard areas
_ planned for com mon use by occupants of all dwelling units
P
may be counted in comp uting required tot space per .unit for
townhouses.
requ irements. Similar to section 36- 119(e) of this
(5) Front yard raga he tota
opnnent req uirements we site devel-
division, except that these shall refer to
t
uirements and each dwelling unit may be u to
its particular property line with a garages or carpo abutting
a private, not public, road.
(6) Side yard requirement&
• e total development a , As applied. to the site, the side yard
width.
shall be no less than twenty (20) feet i • .
b. where two (2) or more buildings or eight units occur
the side ands between buildings shall be a (�
on one lot, Y
minimum of twenty (20) feet.
requ ire yard As applied to the total develop -
(7) Rear yard minimum of twenty (20)
anent site, the rear yard shall be a . Ord.
h. Ord. No. 245, § 19 (4 906.400),10 -3-
feet in width. (
No. 4489 1 i 7.20 -78; Ord. No. 465, § 1 4.19.79 Ord. No.
529, §
3 11- 22 -82; Ord. No. 551, § 4, 9- 12-83)
Sec. 36 -125. Same-- part art of planned unit development.
' her types of multiple dwelling
Townhouses, together with of yPe l • �,
combination of different types of dwel ing
structures, or any . .
' under this division, shall be eligible
tares defined and classified went ur
• red and treated as a planned unit develop P
to be considered his chapter. (Ord. No. 245,
suant to the provisions of article V of t P
120 (1 906.410) 1 10 -3-68; Ord. No. 559, 1 2 9 12-12-83)
Sapp. Na 9 2233
Skillman & Arkwright R-3 RM
Skillman &
Edgerton
R-3
SURVEY
FOR R-3
REPORT
R-3
RH
Belmont & Bradle
R-1
Devel aped
Undeveloped
'Location
R-3
Zone
Plan
Ac
Ac
Larpenteur
J ack son
& J
R-3
RH
0
1 e6
Larpenteur
& Agate
R-3
RH
lei
0
Adol phus. St
F
R-3
RH
109
0
Larpenteur
&
R-3
RH
3e2
0
:McMenem
RM
Ct Rd. D
84 Care
Ct. Road B
and
R-3
RM 3x6
0
Mississippi
DC
Woodl &
McK%*night
R-3
RM
Edgerton &
Rose lawn
R-3
RH
2uO
0
Skillman & Arkwright R-3 RM
Skillman &
Edgerton
R-3
RH
Skillman &
Edgerton
R-3
RH
Belmont & Bradle
R-1
RM
:Rose lawn &
Arcade
R-3
RH
Rosel awn &
McMenem
R-3
RM
McMenem South of
Bellwood
F
RM
McMenemy North of
Larpenteur
F
RM
Larpenteur
& Parkwa
R-3
RH
Parkwa Drive
R-3
RH
Ct Rde C
& Hw e6l
M-1
RM
Ct Rd. D
84 Care
Heights Drive
F
RM
Ct &
Hazelwood
F
DC
Woodl &
McK%*night
R-3
RM
Ct &
Ariel
F-PUD
RM
Ct &
McKnight
F
RM
7a4
12aO
3uB
6.1
009
2.3
0
0
5.8
0
0
I
0
2n9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3e5
5n5
4.6
0
20.9
10+
38+
80e2
4.8
31n3
5.9
Name
4-pl
Maple Manor
Larpenteur East
Mississippi
Apartments
Maple Manor
Care Center
Tarr Town
Edgerton Highland
Edgerton Manor
Mapl e Val I e
4� 6�
Bennington Woods
Golf Course
Woodl Heights
Townhomes,
Wood l yn n& Ar i e l F -PUD RM
L. Y d i a. and Ar i el
F -PUD
RH
R a datz & White Sear
R--3
RM
Ra datz & White Sear
R--3
RM
R adatt & White Bear
R -3
RM
Cty . Rd . D , West of
R -3
RH
Sout h l awn
0
Park
County Rd. D &
.
088
40M
Southl awn
R--3
RH
Radatz, & Southl awn
R -3C
RM
Mesabi
F--PUD
RL
Eleventh & Ar i e l
F
RH
Cope At l antic
R -3
RH
Cope & Germain
R-3C
RM
Sherren & White Bear
R -3
FAH
.Cope & Van Dyke
R-1
RH
-Co .Rd . B & Van Dyk a
R -3
RM
Co .Rd .B & Hazelwood
R--3
RH
Co . Rd . B & Hwy . 61
R -1
RM
.Co. . S & Eng l i sh R1 --PUD
RM
:.Burlington Northern
R - y
RM
& Skillman
Northern Fac i f i s
State Trail
R -3
RH
Frost & Clarence
R--2
RM
Frost & Walter
R -1
RM
Skillman & Clarence
R-.2
RM
.Skillman & English
R - 2
RM
Frost & Birmingham
R -3
RM
0
4.7
Cottages cif
0
1.?
Mapl ewood
4.1
0
Concordia Arms
0.4
0
3 -p1 ex
4.1
0
Lake Fridge
3.6
0
Park
0
.
088
40M
5 .1
16.1
Mapl a Ridge
0
2 .O
-
0
1.?
Brandt Project
1009
0
Maple Knot l
0
b 1
- -
2 w O
0
Mapl ewood Manor
3.6
0
Mapl e Farb:: Shore
1 as
0
Maplewood Senior
Care
. O
0
3.O
- -
4 w 2
0
Egad f ord ,Rider &
Adel Apts .
0
2w4
0
4.5±
- -
0
4.3
0
2n2
0
0.9 -
0
2.3 - -
o
i . S ....
0
308
O ,5
0 Apt . ,garden type
L arp en t eur & Clarence
R -1
RM
0
3.
Frost & English
R - 3
RM
0
9 . 5
- --
Frost & Frank
R -2
RM
0
10.4
- now
( i n c l u d e s 3.2
acre
pond i ng easement)
F'r ' sb i e& English
�
R -3
RH
1 0 0
D
English Manor
East Shone Drive
R--3
RH
3.4
0
Park view Ct .
Larp en t eur & Century
R -3
FAH
0
9,n.5+
H i l l- Murray H. S
Larpenteur &
F -PUD
RM 9 0S
36.
31z6
Townhouses of
.McKnight
of Map 1 ewood &
Maple Woods Estates
Lar P enteur & Beebe
R-'3
RM
2.7
Southw i nds of
Maplewood I
Beebe Road
F
�
RM
0
15.7
Southwi nds of
Map ewood I I
Holloway & Beebe
F--PUD
RM
12.1
0
Archer Heights &
Forest Green
Holloway & Furness
R--3
RM
0
4.7
-- --
Holloway owa & Beebe
� Y
R--3
RH
0
4.2
- -
Larp en t eur & Beebe
F
RM
0
4.O
L.ar P en t eur { Century
R -3
RM
0
20.4
- -
Lar P en t eur & Sterling R--1 , F
RM
0
5 e5
Montana & Currie R- 1 , PUD
RM
2.5
0
Acorn Greenhouses
Condominiums
McKnight & Chicago
R -3
RM
0
64o6
- ....
N .W. Railroad
(Beaver Creek)
Ivy & Ferndale
R--3
RM , oS
10.3
0
P'on d v i ew Apts.
Ivy y & Century
R -3
RM
0
4•
-
Caves Century Add ' n .
R -1 , F
RM
21w3
0
- -'
Hawthorne & Century
R -3
RH
3.6
0
Oakwood Manor
Maryland Ferndale
F -PUD
RM
3.7
16.4
Beaver Creek
Carriage Homes
Maryland & Lakewood
R-3
RM
0
30 •1
-
r
. Maryland & Lakewood
R--3
RM
BOB
0
Maryland W r of Lakewood R -2
RM
0
14
century Tra i 1 er Park
R
M--1
RM
55.5
0
Rolling Hills
Maryland Trailer 1 er Park:
Y
R -3
37 r 8
- a < Ferndal e
St i l l water �.
R -3
RED
O r 3
0
Apt garden type
. Stillwater Ave.
Stillwater er Road
-3
RH
11
0
Silver Ridge
Maryland � • Century
. Y
R -1
RM
183
1 00
Century East
S t i l l w a t e r Aver
R--3
RH
0
2v 2
Mc �= n i g h t
McKni
7th & St Rd r
R -3
RH
0
� _.
2 r 4
Now
St i l l water Rd gf 7th
R- i
RH
0
2 n 4
�
Minnehaha a Century ur
R -3
RH
O r7
0
Apt. ,garden type
.M i nnehaha & Century
R -1
RH
0
6 r 6
Stil 1 water Rd & Bush
R -1
RH
0
2s7
sow
Minnehaha a Carl ton
R -3
RH
0
4 r 6
_-
Minnehaha & Carlton
R -1
RH
0
10 9
Conway & Ferndale
R - 3
RH
2 v0
0.
Broot =:view A< Century
R -3
RH
681
0
Rroo�:: v i ew Manor
Century Ridge
a.
Lower Afton &
F -PUU 9
RM
0
1385
- -
'Dorl and Road
L.ond in Lane &
F -FULL
RM
9n6
0
Connemara Apts .
Crestview
�
Fond & McKnight
R -3
RM
4 r 7
0
McKnight T r Houses
Londin Lane &
F -PULE
RH
21e2
0
Mapl eh i 1 1 s
Townhouses I & II
Uorl and Road
Ma i l an d & Crestview
F _ PUL i
R-1
29 . i
1008
Crestview Forest
Townhouse
Fores
• -F'UD FtL 1 . Linwood Ht� , & H ill wood & Dorl and
Adrienne's Add n
Crestview Drive
-1 F�L 3.9 0 - --
Lond in
Totals
458.8 487.1
i
945m9
Grand Total
Agenda Number & . /
AGENDA REPORT
T0: Mayor and Council
FROM City Manager 7 y
RE: 1988 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND AUDIT
DATE: June 16, 1989
.Action by Counoil ,
Endorsed
Modif zed- --.,.
Re j ected
Date
Presentations will be made by Steve Laible, Peat Marwick Main and Company, and
our Finance Director on the following items:
1. Opinion on financial statements (page 20 of the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report);
2. Legal Compliance Audit (see attached Exhibit A);
3. Report on internal, accounting controls (see attached Exhibit B);
4. Management recommendations (see attached Exhibit C); and
5. Financial highlights of 1988 (page 6 of the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report) .
Councilmembers should bring their copy of the 1988 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report to the meeting. Also, Councilmembers may want to reread the
letters of transmittal (pages 4 -18) as they are a key part of the report.
DFF: kaz
Attachments
f
EXHIBIT A
PPeat Marwi'ck
Certified Public Accountants
Peat Marwick Main & Co.
4200 Norwest Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Independent Auditors' Report
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Maplewood, Minnesota:
We have audited the combined financial statements of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota (the City), for the year ended December 31, 1988, and have issued
our report thereon dated March 10, 1989. Our audit was made in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for compliance
audits contained in the Lecxal Compliance Audit Guide issued by the Legal
Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 6.65 and,
accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other
auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The
Legal Compliance Audit Guide covers five main categories of compliance to be
tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of
interest, public indebtedness, and claims and disbursements. Our audit
included all of the categories listed above.
The management of the City is responsible for the City's compliance with laws
and regulations. In connection with the audit referred to above, we selected
and tested transactions and records to determine the City's compliance with
those laws and regulations for which noncompliance could have a material
effect on the City's combined financial statements.
The results of our tests indicate that for the transactions and records
tested, the City complied-with those laws and regulations referred to above.
With respect to the transactions and records that were not tested by us,
nothing came to our attention to indicate that the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota had not complied with the laws and regulations referred to above.
This report is intended solely for the use of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota and should not be used for any other purpose. This restriction is
not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of
public record.
March 10, 1989
Member Firm of
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
i
EXHIBIT 6
Peat Marwick
Page 1 o f 2
Certified Public Accountants
Peat Marwick Main & Co.
4200 Norwest Center Telephone 612 341 2222 Telecopier 612 341 0202
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Independent Auditors' Report
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Maplewood, Minnesota:
We have audited the combined financial statements of the various funds and
account groups of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the City) for the year
ended December 31, 1988, and have issued our report thereon dated March lo,
1989. As part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the City's
system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered necessary
to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards.
The purpose of our study and evaluation was to determine the nature, timing
and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on
the City's financial statements. Our study and evaluation was more limited
than would be necessary to express an opinion on the system of internal
accounting control taken as a whole.
The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining a
system of internal accounting control, In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of control procedures. The objectives of a system
are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that
assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, and
that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization
and recorded properly to permit the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of inherent limitations in any system of internal accounting control,
errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also,
projection of any evaluation of the system to future periods is subject to
the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in condi-
tions or that the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate,
Our study and evaluation made for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in the sys-
tem. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system of internal
accounting control of the City of Maplewood taken as a whole. However, our
study and evaluation disclosed no condition that we believed to be a material
weakness.
We are providing in a separate exhibit our recommendations to improve adminis-
trative procedures and documentation of management information systems.
Member Firm of
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
)IRMPeat Marwick
i
1
1
EXHIBIT S
2
Page 2 of 2
We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the courtesy and assis-
tance extended to us by the personnel of the City of Maplewood during the
course of our examination, and we look forward to the opportunity to work
with you in the future,
100
March 10, 1989
ti
EXHIBIT C
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Administrative Procedures and Financial Management Records
We noted the following conditions that suggest a need to improve administra-
tive procedures in areas that involve financial management records:
• Minutes - Minutes from the period November 1988 through March 1989 were
not written, approved and posted on a timely basis (within 30 days of
Council meeting).
• Civil Service Regulations - A provision authorizing severance pay was
deleted from the Civil Service Regulations but not added to the Person-
nel Policies as planned.
• Contract Change Orders - Dollar amounts have been omitted f rom some
change orders for public improvement project contracts.
• Special Assessment Detail Records - Some records pertaining to special
assessments (cancellations, deferment and abatements) are maintained by
the City Clerk. The Finance Department has a need for fiscal informa-
tion related to special assessment actions. In addition, the City
records including delinquent special assessments shoult agree to records
maintained by Ramsey County. At the time of the audit City records did
not agree with County records and reconciliations were not being per-
formed timely or effectively. There is a need to improve the flow of
fiscal information among the County, the City Clerk's office and the
City Finance Department.
• Public Utility Records — Detail accounting records for the public util-
ity are maintained by, a clerk in the City Clerk's office. Since these
records relate more closely to responsibilities of the Finance Depart-
ment, consideration should be given to assigning the position of public
utility clerk to the'Finance Department.
The conditions noted indicate a need to examine existing work loads and /or
office automation factors and consider adding staff or equipment. We recom-
mend that the City Council direct the City Manager to make arrangements for a
more in -depth management study of the issues noted above,
Management Information Systems
We noted the following two conditions in the systems area:
• Documentation Standards - There is a need to develop uniform standards
to document changes to existing information systems programs and stan-
dards for:
- program acceptance testing;
- operator instructions; and
- uses procedures.
• Disaster Recovery - There is no formal (written) disaster recovery plan.
We are aware that the City hired an MIS coordinator in November 1988 and
expect that the new person will be addressing the conditions noted above.
^
�
} l r
,
` J
��
�
AGENDA ITEM���
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Geranium/Ferndale Storm Sewer, Projec t 87-2(-
Assessment Hearing
ATE: June 5 1989
The mailing list for the subject proje
hereby transmitted. A copy of the May
that outlines the basis of calculation
assessments is attached for references
amssessment roll is attached.
..
jc
BAI
Action by Ouuno1Ix
Endorse
Y,ndified______-
oje�toI_______.
Date
ct assessmenthearing is
1 1989, agenda report
of proposed $500 per unit
A resolution adopting the
jc
Enclosure
4
tAGENLIA ITEN
Action by Council:.
AGENDA REPORT Endorsc
Vodif ied
Rej ected.-
'TO: Ci Manager 'Date . ........... .
FROM: Director of Public: Works
SUBJECT: Storm Water General Assessment Pol ic y / GeraniLIM--
Ferndale Storm Sewer Assessments, Project 67-D
DATE: may
INTROLtUCTION
The assessment hearing for Project 87-2-N) was contineed to May 8,
1 99. The sta+f was directed to propose a spec
8 l+lc storm sewc%r
storm sewer needs 0+ the entire
assessment p oli c y for the future me the
ci t y . The adoption 0+ a g eneral policy Would then beco
basis 0+ as sessment for Geranium--Ferndale storm sewer.
BACi10%*GR0UNL1
It
• es timated that approximately $8,5 mi ll ion of trunk storm
sewer remains t o be built. This is based on construction o+
connecting P iping,$ and out for storm water control
ponds, Ian. Lateral storm
con sistent with .the city's comprehensive p .
e for i ndividual streets and is ol.ated low areas is not
drainag ystem ackbone of the storm
included. The trunk* s serves as the b im p ac ts a re lativel y large
drainage s and in g eneral
drainage areae
A number of the proposed trunk is for the
, storm s convey drainage from cos
state aid streetse Therefore, a pOrti.on o+ the these
EUT state .aid f ends ,
projects is eli for funding through Mn
directly or through an 0++ -s y stem expenditure on the
either the city& It is estimated that
count state aid s within d fro
about m state aid
funding Could be procure
Mi 11 ion o+
-f Ltnds
imatel y $7.3 mi 1 1 ion to be f ended through
This I eaves approx tion funding. There is a
special assessments and g eneral obl iga sl not b een
tal of 36'?8 gross acres 0 + land that has p y
re v
.to A- tributary to proposed trUnk- storm sewers* In
assessed and is Ci Council a breakdown
accord with comment received from the %
um density
of the number of e>111isting and potential low and me di
parcels was made . to determine requisite 0 i
unit assessment ratess
motel 4700 and 1550 e x.istng or potential low
There are approxim cels, respectively? that could be assessed.
and medium density par d;- ion s feet of hi
There are about 486 net acres or 21 .' mil 1
Project E37-20
l la y I 1 1V09
den . sity residential and commercial /industrial property that •
remains to be assesseds
all of the Cost
• recovered through special . assessments, then
If jum density
the re rates are 1-690a,00 per low or med
residential lot and 13o9 cents per s f.00t of high density
1/industrial property@ To attempt to
residential or . commercial 4 1 assessments Would impose
recover all. co sts through specia schedUling
ions an the flexibility Of
significant limitat" Ia wuld be to fund part of the cost
projects. A more work-able P
n o
through g eneral obl i g ation fundso
R ECOMMENDAT I ON
I t is recommended that the city cou ncil endorse the f ollowing
ls that have been
storm water assessment pol All parce
previously unas for storm sewer shall be assessed at the
following rates:
),Q()/unit
Low Density Residential $50C - . )/un i t
Medium Density Residential $ 5 0 • 0 . w () C
High Density Residential : 0 ,1()/s q uare foot
Commercial /Industrial : ( ).1 0 re foot
/s
Golf . courses P I a f iel ds cemeteries pares 1 . and open space are
p art : l ots or other impervious surfacing
exempt e%#.,.,cept for p % . 1 ()
ass ociated with these properties that shat 1 be assessed at $0
per s foots Churches and school bstantial
WOUI d be assessed at the
foot with the e-,-.,emption of Su
rate Of $0,010 per s
asso ciated unpaved p a field.
These rates will generate $5.25 m illion in current fUnds. To
Uld re the?
fund the balance of trunk: storm sewer needs wo
.
0 m illion of g eneral ob li g ation +inancinc3
appropriation of :t-a_ �t
. ACtiv pl y P L%rc Cn i c,r
• rec ommended that Maplewood ref more encofflP ass ing
of a trunk storm sewer s thrOL tgh seve time frame in response to
area-wide projects over a limited ti
than small loc ali-Zved projects, Larger
current problem rather mpetitively bid and have a lower
P
rojects are g enerally more Co. eering cos ts, Larger
tive and engin
percentage of administrative
ore c ost effective and g enerally produce a more
p rojects are m i s signl+icant
at products if the rate of inflation ior then the
S a onst roc ti
during the time span of trunk storm sewer c
rates should be increased proportionally.
There are 30 low density residential units tributary t o the
sessment roll is a ttached
n iUm--Ferndale storm sewer An as
Ge*ra .
assess as dlSCLISsed herein. This-
;
based upon a : Unit - asse 000 585- oo that was to
would recover $151*00w The balance of $3'.2,
Project
Ma 1 1 1 Y.HV
have been assessed would be financed through g eneral obligation
funding&
ACTION REQUIRED
Du I e to the s i g nificant reduction o+ proposed assessments and
change of basis, a new assessment hearing should be c al leds
R . esolutions to order an assessment hearing are attached.
CAI
j W
Attachments
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by
l ' the city council ���s met and heard and passed on all
~~— - f
objections to the proposed assessment or the construction of
6 er���i�/Uo/Fernd��YW� Storm Sewer as described in the files of the
city a�� Project «
t ��-2� and has amended such proposed
n: ,�
assessment as it deems just m
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, OF
MAPLEWO[]D, MINNESOTA:
-`
i^ Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is
' hereof attached hereto and made a par t ereo is hereby accepted and
~' h constitute ,
ill constitute the sp . ial assessment against the lands named
~ i d h tract of land �he��ir� included is hereby found
therein, �n e�ac r
~ - - �
to be benefited by the proposed improvemen t n t he amount of the
.assessment levied against its
2 Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual in-
st«sllm �*xtending . a period of twenty years, the first of
the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in
b interest at the rate of nine/ (9-0)
January, 1990 and shall ��r �,'==
'
!p e rcen� per annum from the date of the adoption of this assess-
men� resolutio ns �—' - per . o annum ' 7' the - first irst instal l ment shall be added inter-
- '
oast on the entire assessment f rom the date of this resolution
until December 31 19O9. To each subsequent installment when due
sh be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the
c" ` uncil to reimburse itself in th for the portion of the cost c/ s improvement ��a�
f thi i meid for from municipal funds by levying
additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the
assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the
t but t made upon any properties abutting on the
��provemen u no ? f the improvement when
improvement but not herein assessed for ,
changed conditions relating to such properties make such
assessment feasible.
-
4� To the extent that this improvement benefits .
�onabutting properties which may be served by the improwement
*�n one or more later ��utensic�ns or improvements are made, but
which are are not herein asseised therevfore it is hereby declared
be the intention of the council as authorized by Minnesota ��� ���*� ���tiCz� �� �"051, to reimburse the city by adding any
s��«m� �_
p�p�i�n of the cost �o paid i� to the assessments levied for any of
x
such later extension or improvements.
5 The �lerk shall' f orthwith transmit a certified
^ t t the �ounty auditor ��� be extended
duplicate �f this assessment o t
t d ch assessments
' t t lists of the County, and su `
don the property ax ` , . ��. _--_--'�
- -
»she1l be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
mnunicipal taxes.
`
, \
�-/
'
`
TO:, '
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATIONu�
'
APPLICANT/OW
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
SUMMARY
The *appl icant is no longer using his home for a counseling service
as a home occupation. The conditional use permit should, therefore,
B ACKGROUND be terminated.
The* applicant received initial approval for this home occupation
in June of 1983 subject to five conditions. The permit received
a five-year renewal in June of 1984 subject to continued compliance
with the original conditions of approval .
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
f i terminate th
S�ction 36-442 ( ): The council may, upon review, e
permit if the approved conditions may have been violated or the
use is no longer in effect.
Section 36-442 (g): In the event the council in its review
process decides to consider imposing additional conditions or
termination of a conditional use permit, the City Council shall
hold at least one public hearing on that permit after a notice
of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper at
least ten (10) days before said hearing.
RECOMMENDATION
Termination of the conditional use permit for a counseling service
home occupation at 1014 Bartelmy Lane, since the home is no longer
used as a counseling office.
Attachments:
1. Location Mao
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
'
x
Action by camoll I
`
�od��lo�~�~~�.�=~
MEMORANDUM
Rejeoted____���
City Manager Dat
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Termination -^ Home Occupation '
1014 Barte1my Lane ' `
Richard Andrea
May 25 1989 '
andreacup
�= Trailer Court
� I
68 (Private)
roNs !974, AV
E. MARYLAND
�.. [1]20
ST
69 _ '-
o G
� BeOYl'I'
M4 WOIIA AVE. W
0. r`.......` o
� Lake � I �
S N W
68 69 1K _ : eK
CASE '
AVE, H c
32 W b
LA. BRAND AVE.
k�. 212 F raa W D
32 3T.
TTH ,a� E i E. 7 T a •E
T 2 9 N
ac '�
BUSH "' It22w 25130 ---- 1
AV E. Cr 36 31
�.
70
I ]
M!HIJEHAHA AVE
34 ` 3
E MARG
y
F-
�' E STM
• W J
J W
. 3 M < F R E W O ° NT AVE • o
S t T = W
CON ~ AVE SERVICE R0.
1
3M
68 " - •
LOCATION MAP
2 Attachment 1
• _
J
7
MAGNQL LA AV EA
1
m f
V
.37 0.�. • (T�� Or
X50
i
�q4ac ,
f 1 Sg
•
580.
ac.
Co
f
� E M�•l�n�
JC
IS
Jjpl,
f '
mom
to
BEEN w MR^
!
3�
—_ _ SCHQ`
r4,
Its
( 1 � � ,, � f ♦ � )t V � _ - -- ! -ate +�-
f .! � r , f4 !• Z 1 � L
9 , • t � j j
2 ;
-
`4 `j
1 .11-4 molt
r
� u+
t r-
2
f j
13 4 Off_ 13✓1 4 l + i: _ j
•` 1 � + r � `� 1 h ' ' y
x.� } fit` ^�►+ i. ♦ r
{ .f 4 , •
r o or
ot
no
3
'0
ILC
4N Cy
a 6'
L l
Li
Ul 993 e�'}
3 74.1
: 1 3� CO)
► o- ( 75 ' r) 9 ac
W rl
Iglu 14 ;
1. tI C � ` 4� i;�!O 1
t ((
/ l
�J 13T E .
3J
V
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
4
N
3 Attachment 2
4 Y^, u"7,
.--
Acti by Council�
Endorsed.____-..
` MEMORANDUM Modif ......
]ReJ eoted.__-__
TO: City Manager
Dat
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Code Amendment - Garage Sizes
11.1 AT E June 14, 1989
INTRODUCTION
It was recently brought to our attention that the ordinance
limiting garage sizes seems to un+airly limit the size of
detached garages, when a small attached garage already exists.
As an example, a person with a 300-square-foot attached garage on
a 12,000-square-foot lot can only build a 480-square-foot
detached garage-_a total of 780 square feet. A person with the
same size lot and no attached garage can build a 1,000-square-
foot detached garage.
The City Cot..tncil ap.proved the current ordinance on November 14,
1987. '
EITSCUSSION
The proposed ordinance replaces a maximum area for detached
buildings with a maximum area +pr the combined area of all
detached buildin9=. and attached garages. The maximum area is
calculated by adding the old areas for "detached buildings with
an attached garage" and the areas for "attached garages". A
limit is also set on the maximum size of all attached garages and
a limit on the maximum size of all detached buildings.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached ordinance.
MEMO 11
Attachment: :Proposed ordinance
ORDINANCE NOU
AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGULATING ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 36-77 is amended as follows (deletions
are crossed out and additions are underlined):
Sec. 36-77. Accessory Buildings.
(a) The areas of accessory buildings on a lot shall be-
limited to areas in the following table:
Lot Area
(sq.ft.)
Detached Bldgs.
without an
attached garage
BcL*�ckcJ-Bfcf��o�
at e-7 e
( 3)
(4)
Attached�
--12E)
garages
of detached
1,100
and '
detached
attached
1,25(
arage
1,000 (all other bldgs.)
Under 8,000
8,000-11,999
12,000-15,999
16,000-20
21,000-41,999
42,000+
786
429
1,000
--12E)
1,000
--48(;.
1,100
--566
1,250
~-68e
1,25(
+ 250
1,000 (all other bldgs.)
768
1.188
1,000
14 �
1 ,000
1/>B<>
1,100
1660
1
1{}
1 1 250
250C).
*The total area of al I detached accessor --bUi ldi_nq shall not exceed.
the areas in C01 Umn (2) The total area of al attached garage shal I
not e.Xceed the areas in Column (3)
(b) A private garage shall not exceed sixteen feet in height as
viewed from the street.
(c) The City Council may approve an increase in height or area by
conditional use permit. However, the maximum area of any one
building shall not exceed the area allowed for an
attached garage in subsection (a) and the height shall not
exceed the height of the house.
(d) Detached garages shall not include living space. No commercial
use of a garage shall occur unless authorized by the City
Council.
^
.Section 2. Section 30-3 is amended by adding a new subsection (c) :
(c) A lot shall not be divided unless each new lot would be la
enOU to accommodate an ex s
re- in Section 36-77 (a).
Section 3. Section 9-6 (metal storage buildings) is amended by adding a
new subsection (d)&
buildin on the site comply- with the re of this
Section 4. This ordinance shall take e+fect upon its passage and
publication.
Passed by the City Council of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on the
day of , 1989. Ayes--
Nays--
Mayor
City Clerk
V - -3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJE
INTRODUCTION
City Manager
Director of Community Development
Code Amendment - Off-street Parking
June 19, 1989
^- '
Action by Council:*r
Endorse �
Modifiz'
Rejected_______
Th recent variance application for 3M brought a problem with the
City's parking design requirements to our attention - stal l sizes
are too large for employee park and too small for high turnover
uses� such as retail stores.
DISCUSSION
Several changes have been proposed to the parking design
standards, based on the standards of the Institute of
Transportation Engineers for mid-size cars. The major change is
in regard to parking stall sizes" Public parking stall widths
have been increased from half nine-foot and half ten_foot-wide
stalls to ten feet for high turnover uses and 9.5 feet for low
turnover uses. Employee spaces have been decreased to nine feet
Stall lengths have been reduced from 20 to 18 feet.
The current requirement has proven confusing for developers and
resulted in insufficient width. The wider width is particularly
important for high turnover uses, such as retail, where people
need, to open their car doors wider to get packages in. On the
other hand, employee parking is for longer periods of time and a
narrower width is acceptable.
When this ordinance was given first reading on June 8,
Councilmember Juker questioned whether apartments should be
considered high turnover uses, Such as retail centers. Based on
the standards of the Institute of Transportation Engineers,
apartments would generate significantly less traffic per acre than
` retail A high density apartment project on one acre in
Maplewood (17~9 units/acre) would generate an sverage of 99 trips
each day. A retail center on one acre would generate from
268_787 trips each day, depending on the size of the center.
Apartments, therefore, should be considered a low turnover use.
RECOMME
Appr the attached ordinance.
MEMO 12
Attachment: Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S PARKING DES IGN REQUIREMENTS
The Maplewood City C ou ncil hereby ordains as fol (additions
are underlined and deletions crossed out)
Section 1. Secti 6 - t b 1 is amended to read as follows
(b) The following mini park in -mtodul a dimensions shall be
re
90 de ree ark in (in feet) -- Refer to d is ram below
S A
Use Stall width Stall length Aisl a width
rrrwrw rrwrrni .rnrr+rrr rmrrrrr i
Customer,
h i h turn over
10
1183
24
Customer
ow turnover
9. 5
18
4
Ems 1 ogee
■ r
on 1 y
9
1 �
24
60 degree ark:: i n tin feet)
- Refer to
di bet ow
S
D
A
Use
rrrrrYr
Stal 1 width
Stal 1 1 r en9th
rqr ryirrfrrOrl�FYiirrl
Aisl a width
�
Customer,
h i h turnover 18
15w6
, 2
Customer
i ow turnover 9
1 5v6
22
Em 1 o ee
only 9'W0
45 de ark: i.n (in feet) - Re+er to di_a ram _ below
S
D
A
Use Stall width
Customer, high--turnove 10
0� I
Custom low turnover 9a5
Emgloyee . o 900
Stal l e n th Aisle width
12v6 22a6
12.6 22u6
1286 22.6
0� S
S
O� 'o
E S
D=18 A D=18 D 0 A D
90* Parkin 60' and 45* Parkin
Park ing stal I I en ma
. be reduced, b - 2.5 f eet +car degree
2 arks ing and two feet for an 2 ark ing-where the __- ing space
-abuts a curb,, sidewalk or landsca e area. All overhan (o)
areas shal I... beA,hard..surf ace or crushed rock,
"Customer, high.- turnover" uses shah I incl ude shODDinq centers
retail sales,- --f.ast food restaurants, convenience centers and
similar usesm "Customer_,_Iow turnover" uses shall include
0++ 'ices-, industrial school s churches resea mul t ipl e-
dwel I ings. motels sit-down restaurants and simil ar uses. An
te st ions on de+inin these uses shall be ref erred to the
Communitv Desi Review Board for a decision.
Empl oyee ---park i-ng ---- with -reduced stall widths must be sighed for
em2loyee ark: in onl
�b�- - -��f ��p-- ����-- percerst -of - r�tnet�- degree -perk; tfi�--spa�ees- ���t�-� -��
e��fier-�spa�es ; -- tr����e��r�g- -�t�net�- t�egree�- s�a��s- -f flr- etwr�er- �ccttp�ec�
I
"+met een-4+9+- +,eet-*MOSWO+eM9t h-4ffiees"red - are+ + e+e- "+ th-t he-stim + pi : - -�f-��t-- T*nes*-- ex-e +tts+ ve-e+ -ac %rj.. TMS
c�.t ;- ��dea��c�� -- ter— ��rd����ecf -erea ;— thee- •r-�gtt�ree�— f�r�gt� -- oaf -tfi�
sp��e- �n�t�r— t�e�retftt��t��- ��- -or��— fc�rk
���- �- A�- �- �- sps. ee�-- sh�t��-- �e-- ser��e�-- bq-- �t�e���—; ����-es-- caf— the e�
j ste
down
24 +two- we y -time++ r*c**
*9-40Me-"S
45-desree +6-4ome-"e
(c) -+d)- All parking lots shall have continuous concrete curbing
sUrrounding the exterior perimeter of the lot and drives. Park
'parking lots, that are not used in the winter, and parking lots
having twelve (12) spaces or less are exempt -From this
rLe unless re b the cit engineer for drainage
control .
(d) - +e+ All parking lots shall be continuall and properl
maintained.
e *++ I park iLng I ots and associated drivewa shat I have a
hard surf ace of bituminous or concrete. Al I parking spaces shat I
be marked with a +our-inch-wide "hairpin" striping atternip
strfm+ped -a
(f) The Cit ma a ten-+oot-wide _p or median str
ever v three or +our parkin ba to revent hi movement
diagonall across the arkin lot and to im estheticsU
(Re+er to dia below.)
0
1
I I I H V-11-1
ME
0
o
Landscaped divider
> 5,
10
lu
a C 3 < 7 _C_;5 00
MEN No
=== mm
. 3
t In shopping - centers and other large devel o ments ex ter i or
p arking - closest to the bui shall be oriented with the
arkin driwes er endicul ar to the boil din face whenever
12 racticable s
th) -Parkin stalls shall not be allowed in front of a bui l d in
entrance i+ there is no sidewalk in front of the bu .1 din
entrance
t i 3 Interl ock in or "herringbone" deli ns shall not be allowed
in pub is erk ing 1 ofs. (Fie +er to the fol l owin di rim. )
4
MEMORANDUM Action by Colmoil
Endorsed
TO: Cit Manager Mo dif i e d.,
FROM: Thomas Ek strand , Associate Planner i ]ReJ ecte
SUBJECT: LOT SPLIT AND CORNER LOT WIDTH AND AREA Dat®
VARIANCES
LOCATION: 1255 Riple Avenue
APPLICANT/OWNER: Robert D. and Kim W Al iperto
DATE: Ma 31, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The a pp l icants are re approval to split their propert to
create an.86.3-b 133.8-+oot parcel on which their house is
i twat ed and a substandard 73.7-b 133.8 --foot corner lot. This
I of spl it woul d re the +ol I owing approval s:
1-U 'A 26.3-+oot lot-width variance from the subdivision code.
The subdivision code re at least 100 feet of width for
a new corner lots
2a A 1.7-+oot lot-width variance from the zoning code. The
zoning code re at I east 75 feet of width for a
buildable lot.
3. A 140- -s --foot lot-area variance from the subdivision and
zoning codes. The corner lot would be onl 9,860 s
feet in area. Code re at least 10,000 s feet.
(Refer to the applicant's written justification on page 9.)
BAD(GROLIND
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this case on
April 3. Following that meeting, Mr. Aliperto had a surve done
that showed that the corner lot would be L73.7 feet wide, rather
than 7.6 feet wide as originall proposed: The smaller lot width
creates a lot-area variance and a variance from the 75 -foot lot-
width re in the zoning ordinances
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
in To approve subdivision variances, Council must find that the
substandard width of this proposed corner lot would not
adversel effect the general plan or spirit and intent of
the ordinances
20 To approve the zoning 'variances section 367.10 subdivision
6 (2) of State law re that Council make the following
+ indings:
a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because
of circumstances unique to the property under
consideration.
b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship" as used in connection with the qranting of
a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a
reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the
official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to
unique to his property, not created by the
landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality. Economic
considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship
if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of
the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approval of a lot split and adoption of the resolution on
page 14 approving a 26.3-foot lot-width variance and a 140-
square-+oot l variance on the basis that the corner
lot would not effect the general plan or spirit and intent
of the ordinance because:
a.
'
All required setbacks could be met.
b. The proposed lot would be similar in width with four
other substandard corner lots in the neighborhood, two
of which are on the same corner as the applicant's lot,
and two are similar in area.
Before the new deeds may be approved, the applicant shall
relocate the existing detached garage on the new interior
lot.
2. Adootion of the resolution on page 16, approving a 1.3-foot
lot-width variance and a 140-square-foot lot-area variance,
based on the findings that:
a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because
of okrcumstances unique to the property under
consideration because:
(1) The property cannot be put to a reasonable use
without the variances, because: (a) the current
width of 160 feet exceeds the width of most other
` lots in the area, and (b) the area could be met by
Jogging the lot line into the interior lot.
�
(2) The p ight of the I andowner is due to
circumstances uni to the propert not created
b the landowner, because the existing house which
was placed b a previous owner prevents moving the
lot line to the east.
(3) The essential character of the area will not be
altered, since:
(a) All re setbacks could be met to provide
propert sight lines at the intersection.
(b) The proposed lot would be similar in width
with four other substandard corner lots in
the neighborhood, two of which are on the
same corner as the applicant - s lot and two
are similar in area.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff mailed surve to the 32 propert owners within 350 feet
for their comments regarding this proposal. Of the 17 replies,
six were in favor, eight had no comment and three objected*
T ON& ce a& & J P.M Wft
in I am in favor, but, I don , 't want this to interfere with an
future plans to m propert or to an .future bu (This
response was from the prope owner to the north.)
2a I.+ the Alipertos wish to do this with their propert it's
their decision,
3" This re poses no problem I can foresee.
4w A new home there would just improve the neighborhood..
tab je tions
In We object to an building on that propert because we go
along with Cit code of 100 feet (two replies).
2. If y ou let one part break the code, then its open to al I
parties. I+ y ou give in. that creates a blind corner. That
street could be widened in the future.
Staff comment: A home on this lot would have to meet the
re 30-foot setback from each right-o+-wa line. There
would not be a blind corner. Since the setback is to the
right-of-wa line, rather than the pavement, the street can
be widened.
3a Refer to page 12 a
Staff comment: It is not fair to compare the previousl
denied lot-width variance for 1279 Riple Avenue to this
re That proposal was denied due to drainage concerns
and the appearance of overcrowding. Also., the lots were
onl 60 feet wide. (Note that Mr. Wolfe's corner lot, 1233
Riple is onl 72 feet wide.)
REFERENCE
Site Description
In Site size: 21,417 s feet
2. Existing Land Use: single dwelling and garage
Surroundin Land Uses
The propert is bounded on the west b Atlantic Street and on the
south b Riple Avenue. Single dwellings surround the
applicant's lot,
Past Action - 1279 Riple
April 25, 1983: The Cit COUncil denied a I of spl it and I ot-
width variance for 1279 Riple Avenue to create two 60-+oot-wide
b 134-foot-deep lots since approval would create drainage
problems causing a hardship to other low-l lots and would
.change the character of the neighborhood. (Refer to the Propert
Line/Zoning Map on page 7.)
,Pl anni
in Land Use Plan Designation: RL, low densit residential
2n Zoning: R-1 sing e dwel I ing residential
38 Ordinance re
a M Subsection 30-8 (f) (b) re that corner lots be at
least 100 feet wide at the established building setback
I ine and 10,000 s feet in area.
bw Subsection 36-69 of the zoning code re that all
lots in an R-I district be at least 10,000 s feet
in area and not be less than 75,+eet in lot width,
jl/ALIPERTO
Attachments
is Location Map
2. Propert Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4a Applicant's Re for Variance
5n Neighborhood surve response from R. Wolfe
6a Resolution - Subdivision variances
7 n Resolution - Zoning variances
~ ST.
F- �1 Q yNs a
�, c, • 19 � vo
z
o ......_ _....._
BEAM :: ARK AV
22
Z
z .4 � 11
.n�.
0 rij / i� W NA M
3 l�loh/man Loke U POND
Lake.
KOHLMAN 0 AV
Z N.. S
13 - CO RD ��C�� W
a
J 2 o--- -
w PALM C$)r z a
-� PALM
Y CR v 2 O Ova w N a
J -+ ' 4 W
C�T G ON R UL
NOR �� � � DEMONT AV
I PL A ZA C/R DE- MONK AV o (I) CON NOR AV
2 ALVERADD DR o ? BR00
3 SELLCREST DR S o o N AV
4 DEAUVILLE DR 22 W BRO p z
5 MERIDIAN DR � � 4� � EXTANT � ai
XTAN T AV
112 gr
60 ���� PQ W
GERVAIS AV _ Q c� a GE
GRANDVIEW AV W
P
P�OL Co VIKING pR Y
RREN A /^^�
"`�"'° Knuckle Heod L of
N COPE CT COPE AV w-
AAL Keller Lok e W
~ N o
W t G OR ��., LARK AV � N
19 4% W w o a Q- CO RD 8 g LAURIE a
a a
25 LELAND RD 0 SAND- HURST ¢ Z
I CO RD B a JUNCTION ST o x
BURKE AV
� ,Q Cr AV °
BURKE o
W O (1) CHAMBERS ST H P (I) �E AV m 00
ELDRIDGE N 3
Q v� ELDRIDG AV
Oehrline Q B
Lok @ y gELM NT Cq a e� �A A N BEL A
N
SKI W a
�., RECD
SKILLMAN A( KILLMAN AV yQ � RRI
W KENW OD o v Q N RC
3 LA AV Q
W V RN J A
Q N m MT. ON N A/
R YAN RY- J S
a w W AV 26 TR
'Q c
Q J W ' 28
a ° ° FROST IL
v AV
+
BELL o 0 0 D AN 60 i �. �-. m c
O
a o / 27 w EN TON AV N H w 1
3 0 Q � S ME R AV o SUM R
000, W ~ W 3 %.-
� Z 3 a it FRISBIE AV �y = p o
RE W 62 a RI EY N - Z v' x a
4V R E� �— x i
> 27 . � A v W ,� ��, W�4K�F /ELD Y
a Round _ Z _ m S ti `'� v11
4GSTON AV L#ke S a N W MtA AV p LAKt
Cr. t Z AV PRICE
W
Q 30 LA A TEUR AV
Lokr?h�o /erg
30
SAINT PA UL 62 s4
. 61
.:- LOCATION MAP 6 p.
6 Attachnent 1
4
N
NUNN
y Ik 0313
o EIL
L g y m
VE
Lj
•
.,..,•, ._ �o , }..• ' X254 ' 8 �� 30
o . .. t
.now
1 �. 84, ,, i i.e
1Z
��. ,:..�. ,� 1246 :.�� a ...
II I'll 1015 7
119'`' 1� =�3 };1 2 t"� ��.�
.,
.•.
I A i i q9 n I I
z IA-
XS
6 .:•i:'; �;
1 9 3 1 2 0 12 3 3 1 .i. �� r '
i 1263
'*14
i� 21 , •�q1 2
1 a 11 1221 .,.�" 1255
1 199 toil 1227 ra 0
V11V =am
.es d
- fi t • . �:... of
r
�5
30
6
or
o"
Ito ab� 0
N
94
( h
3) r
or 0
�no o
i
—_J
�= l
Ito
X37
ZONTNG: R1 = Single Family R2 = Double Dwelling R3 = Multiple Dwelling
� Lot split &width variances denied on 4-25 -83 (1279 Ripley)
�'•�������� Potential Substandard Corner Lots
. Existing Substandard Corner Lots
PROPERTY LINE' / ZONING MAP
Attachment 2
4
N
ISO t oe
f ,
Ole
- 7 - -- ` ---- -- ._
p ;;, �� .t : • r-- : -
N. 69 0 4-V 53 E. ; ; .. ,,, •y -•r• -- r -, ,'. ; ; .--- i
160.00 Plat
-•- 160.05 Men.-•• --
• • �; PrOPO4F t 4 ; _._.. .66 - -_ Drain ge -- -.-�,; - -_,; U R i r _ .39 -- Easenent .. �+____ -• ;
5 1
ILI
t
1 1
N�� , j �'
to 41 Off
IMOMM 1
1 1 �
1
33.66 :
Ci
fn C30
Ilk
CO
Q.• �� .o r 1 1 �__
OC
�Cn . C ��� �� �,�� � � ` ` � Ils i ��\ ` I. l ♦ f• \ 1 1 Opp
OM
1 . , SSA b, r
I . 1 Existing I •�
4 2 -Story
�p ,�, Stucco
�z M-1tj- 0 � ,. I
a 1255 RipleyAHe.
pp i
� V 1 �� 1 01 1•� 1 ' � 1
� (� J i -, ' �•' 16.4 r ;
1
5 '
60 5:5
.. ._�. Proposc _ 6� -- Drain - :•..��, �,and 86.34, Easement
... - -- 164.00... - - --
• --5.69 ° 41`40 "W.
P r of a Cj @• � J 1
O
tD
IZIPLEY AVENUE APR 20ag
SITE PLAN
8 A 3
Attachment
4
N
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
We, Robert D. and Kim W. Aliperto, hereby request approval from the
Maplewood City Council for a lot variance to divide the lot on which
our home is located, at 1255 Ripley Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota
55109, into two single dwelling lots. This division requires a var-
73. 7
lance because the corner lot would be -�-6 feet wide. The current par -
cel is a single dwelling parcel, 160 feet by 133.8 feet. The corner
73.7
lot af ter the division would be 1-6- feet by 133.8 feet; the remaining
�G.39
lot would be -;5.4 feet by 133.8 feet. (Please refer to the attached
maps showing the existing lot placement and the proposed lot place -
ment). Our proposal includes relocating the garage from its existing
position to a new position so that it would be on the salve lot as
the home after the division.
FACTS
110 Strict enforcement of the zoning code in this case would cause
an undue hardship because:
a. The proposed corner lot is similar in width to the majority
of developed corner properties in this vicinity. To refuse
to allow us a variance would be unfair, since allowing the
variance would merely make this property similar to surround-
ing corner lots.
b. Donald F. and Sandra J. Thompson, the owners of the home at
1254 Frisbie Avenue, which is legally described as:
W. H. FISHER'S ADDITION TO GLADSTONE, MINN.
N. 1/2 OF VAC ALEY ADJ AND FOL LOTS 15
THRU 18 BLK 1
have indicated they have no intentions of subdividing their
lot. They also indicated that they do not oppose our attempt
to subdivide our lot. Due to property improvements and add-
itions to their home, the makeup of their property is sub-
stantially different from our property.
2. The spirit and intent of zoning and subdivision codes would be
met by allowing this variance because:
9
Attachment 4
a. Approval of this request would not result in a sight dis-
tance problem at the intersection of Ripley Avenue and
Atlantic Street.
b. The proposed corner lot would have adequate yard area.
c. The existing house was constructed prior to adoption of the
city zoning codes; as such, its placement presently pre-
cludes compliance with minimum lot frontage requirements.
d. Smaller size corner lots have been developed in this neigh-
borhood; thus, the newly created lot would be in character
with the neighborhood.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
NORTH: 1254 4 Fri sbie Avenue.
NORTHWEST: 1.246 Frisbie Ave.
corner lot.
WEST: 1233 Ripley Ave.
corner lot.
Single dwelling
Single dwelling on a 72 foot wide
Single dwelling on a 72 foot wide
SOUTHWEST: 1791 Atlantic St. Single dwelling
SOUTH: 1246 Ripley Ave. Single dwelling on a 72 foot . wide
corner lot.
NOTE
Measurements were estimated using the center of the paved streets
as the starting point.
Upon preliminary approval. a survey to develop actual lot measure-
ments will be conducted.
Attachments:
Ramsey County Abstract of Title Report for Zoning Purposes
Map Showing Existing Lot Placement
Map Showing Proposed Lot Placement
Respectfully submitted,
Date:
Robert D. Al ipe to
Date: �
' _ '�
,,�., -� �..._.. x..1
Kim W. Aliperto
10
Additional Pertinent Information
1. The back entrance to the existing house would be altered to
open t o the Mo - This chan would c reate a more reasonable
access to the interior propert while allowin more privac
for the newl proposed corner propert lo
2. In addition to relocatin the g ara g e to the Easterl side of
the existin houser the g ara g e would be scaled down (2 stall
maximum) to more closel reflect the character of the existin
house.
3. The crea,tion,. of rental propert is not the intent of this pro-
posed subdivision-M
/ 2- - 6"'_
11
,ass ,��
r
CITY OF
W
w I -
1830 E. COTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
612-770-4560
September 27, 1988.
Lawrence & R. L. Wolfe 10-06-188
1233 Ripley Ave. NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY
St. Paul, MN 55109
This survey is to get your .opinion on an application the City has received to develop.
property in your neighborhood. The application is for a lot division, which would
create a corner lot with only 76 feet of frontage on Ripley Avenue (Code requires 100
feet) at 1255 Ripley Avenue. (See the enclosed maps.) The applicants are Robert
Aliperto and Kim Wiggins Aliperto.
Your opinion is needed to assist the City staff and Planning Commission in preparing
a recommendation to the City Council. Once this survey is completed, you will be
notified of any public hearings. .
Please indicate your opinion and comments below and return only this cover letter
(and any attachments on which you have written), to me in the enclosed postage —paid
envelope by October 7, 1988.
If you would like further information please call me at 770 -4560 between 8:00 A.M.
and 5:00 P.M. Thank you for your comments. They will be given careful considerat'on.
0
THOMAS EKSTRAND — ASSOCIATE PLANNER
3E/n jm
Enclosures
I am in favor of this proposal because
I have no nt . '
I object h' -
to this ro osal because
� P P
If you object, describe below, or describe on the enclosed map, any changes that would 91.
make it acceptable, how should t property be dev l ped.
a . .►
(Project: Aliperto Lot Split &Corner Lot Width Vari� e�;�T255 �R�pley Ave.
12 (Please use reverse side if more room is nee - ded)
Attachment 5
OP
AI
,Ooj
i it
.0;6
�Q of
-01
, ,
1
I�-
9 L ex
( r '
7 CAL-
13
�.v� �o -mrXo
St-ibd i v i s i on Code Variance Resolution
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeti of the
Maplewood Cit Council was dul called and held in the Counci-1 Chambers
on the da of 1989 at 7 p.m..
The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Robert D. and Kim W. Aliperto applied for variances from
the subdivision code for the +ollowing'described propert
Lot 19 and the West 33.66 f eet of Lot 20, BI ock I I W.H. FISHERS
ADDITION TO GLADSTONE, Ramse Count Minnesota and the South Half
of the adjacent vacated alle accruing thereton
WHEREAS, Section 30-8 (f) (b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances
re that corner lots have a minimum width of 100 feet and a
minimum area of 10,000 s feet of area.
WHEREAS, the applicant i's proposing a corner lot width of 73.7
feet, re a variance of 26.3 feet, and an area of 9,860 s
feet, re a variance of 140 s +eets
WHEREAS the procedural histor of these variances is as follows:
in These variances were reviewed b the Maplewood Planning
Commission on June 5, 1989. The Planning Commission
recommended to the Cit Council that said variances be
2a The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearing on
to consider these varianceso Notice thereof was
milhlished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at
said hearing . were given an opportunit to be heard and
present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations of the Cit staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the +ollowing
findings of f act
&.
is All re setbacks could be met.
2a The proposed lot would be similar in width with four other
substandard corner lots- in the neighborhood, two of which are
on the same corner as the applicant's lot, and two are
similar in area.
14 Attachment 6
Adopted this da of
Seconded b
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3 SSIN
CITY OF MAPS. EWOOD
A
1 19890
I the undersigned being the dul y q ua) if led and appointed Cl erk
of the Cit of Mapl ewood Minnesota do hereb certif that I have
careful I y compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the Cit of Maplewood, held on the da o+
1 1989, with the original on f it e in m off ice, and the
same is a +ul I true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the
same relates to a code variation,
Witness m hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the Cit
this da of 1 19896
Cit Cl erk
Cit of Maplewood
15
Variance Resol cation
I Pursuant to due cal I and not ice thereof . a regular meet i ng of the
Maplewood Cit Council was dul called and held in the council
chambers in said Cit on the da of 1989at7 p.m.
The following members were present:
The - following members were absent:
WHEREAS, Robert D. and Kim W. Aliperto applied for variances for
the fol I owing-described propert
Lot 19 and the West 33.66 feet of Lot 20, Block 1 WoHn FISHERS
ADDITION TO GLADSTONE, Ramse Count Minnesota and the South Half
of the adjacent vacated alle accruing thereto.
WHEREAS, Section 36-69 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances
re that all lot in an R-1., single-dwelling residence district,
have at least 10,000 s feet of area and 75 feet of lot width
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a corner lot which would have
9,860 s feet of area and 73.7 feet of frontage, re
variances of 140 s feet from the lot-size re and 1.3
feet from the lot-width re
WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this variance is as follows:
in This variance was reviewed b the Maplewood Planning
Commission on June 5, 1989. The Planning Commission
recommended to the Cit Council that said variance be
a
2. The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearing on
to consider this variance. Notice thereof was
published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at
said hearing were given an opportunit to be heard and
present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations of the Cit staff and P lanning
Comm 1 ss i on .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
in Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of
cit�%cumstances uni to the propert under consideration
because:
16 Attachment 7
a. The property cannot be put to a reasonable use without
- the variances, because: (1) the current width of 160
feet exceeds the width of most other lots in the area,
and (2) the area could be met by jogging the lot line
into the interior lot.
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to the property, not created by. the landowner,
because the existing house which was placed by a
previous owner prevents moving the lot line to the
easto
C, The essential character of the area will not be altered,
si��ce�
(1) All required setbacks could be met to provide
property site lines at the intersection.
(2) The proposed lot would be similar in width with
four other substandard corner lots in the
neighborhood, two of which are on the same corner
as the applicant's lot, and two are simi1ar in
area.
Adopted this day of , 198921
Seconded by Ayes--
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF RAMGEY ) SS.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOTE-1
)
I, the undersigned, being the dul y qualified and appointed Clerk
of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota do hereby certify that I have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of
, 1989, with the original on file in my office, and the
same i s a ful], true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the
same relates to these variances.
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City
this day of , 19890
City C}erk
City of Maplewood
17
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes 6-5-e9
di d whether these lots ld be id d
grand thered uses. The commission r s considered
f ront or back- of the propert
_~~~.'= -_
Housing disc Sure statement .
Commissianer '`
recommend reado ion of e pipeline setback
ordinance as prop sed b staff with the following
two additions
1. S t1 '9 218
that were con icted prior to August 10 1 198 1 7
shall be exe t -om this article.
2. Section 9 N o ithstanding the above, the
Director a also r UCe the setbac�.-- where the
building or addition ould not be an closei.--%
buildi cis.
C,ommissio Cardinal seconded
Ayers, Barrett,
Cardinal, Fiola,
Fischer
D. ment: Conditional Use Perm
`
' oner Fischer moved the Planning mmission table
this m to the next meeting due to the teness of the
h ou
Co issioner Cardinal seconded Ayes dahl ,
^' Ayers arrett ,
�
Cardin I , Fiola,
Fischer/
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Lot Split and Corner Lot Width and Area Variances:
1255 Ripley Avenue (Aliperto)
Secr Olson presented the staff report.
Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission
recommend:
-5- Planning Commission
Minutes 6-5-89
in Approval of a lot split and adoption of the
reso 1 ut i on approving a .2--6.3 l of - i d t 1
vari ance and a 14� �-- square• - f oot 1 ot--area
vari on the basis that the corner lot would
not effect the general p l a n or spirit grid
intent of the ordinance because
a . ill 1 required setback s could be met
b. The P rop osed lot would be similar in w i d e i
with four other Substandard corner lots i n
the neighborhood, two of which are on the
same corner as the applicant's lot, and
two are similar in area
Before the new deeds may be approved, the
applicant shall relocate the e:: i st i rng det ache(I
garag on the new interior lot
. Ado P t i on of the resolution approving a 1.3-foot
-.-
lot-width variance and a 140 _sgt.tare --foot 1 of
area variance, based on the f ind in4s th:_ t
�-t Strict enforcement would .cause undue
hardship be cat..ise of c ircL tmstances Un igt..tr:a
to the property under cons i derat ion
because
(1) The property cannot be put to a
reasonab use without the variances .4
because (a) the current width of
1.2-0 � feet e:•: seeds the width of most
other 1 ots in the area, and (b) the
area could be met by jogging the lot.
l i n e i. nto the interior lot .
(2) The plight of the landowner is due to
circumstances unique to the propert
not created by the landowner, becau se
the e.; isting house which was [-.)laced
by a previous owner prevent-.s mov i ri �3
the 1 of 1 ine to the east .
(3) The essential character of the area
wit 1 not be al tered, since:
( Al 1 required setbacks could be
met to provide property sight
1 ines at the intersection .
' Planning Commission
Minutes 6-5-89
(b) The prpposed lot would be
similar in +/idth with four other
substandard corner |ots_in the
neighborhood, two of which are
on the same corner-as the
applicant's lot, and two ar-e
similar in area.
d A
Commissioner 8arrett seconded yes-- A x dahl ,
Barrett,
'
Ay , Fiola,
Fischer
' 2
resented a report on the
Co — p
May 18 and Commissioner Cardinal
C ou n cil presented a p. rt - o f the Council meeting of May 22.
Big Representativ or he June 8 and 12 Council
Fischer
meetings L sc
X. STAFF PRESENTAT NS
xI A�JOU�NMENT �
" .` �
"
Meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m.
Action b Council.
Endorsed.
MEMORANE14JM Modified...
Rejected....
T Cit Manager Date,
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
LOPATI ON S. W. Corner of Count Road C and Dul uth Str%eet
APPLICANT: Goff Homes Inc.
OWNER: Rehbein-Husnick Development Co.
PROJECT: Go++"s Maple-view 2nd Addition
.DATE:: June 14, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Re 4C.
The applicant is re approval of
is A Comprehensive Plan amendment from SC, service commercial
. center to RM, residential medium densit
2. A rezoning from R1 , singl e.-dwel 1 ing residence district to
R3, soul tipl e dwel 1 ing district .
Descr-iption of the Project
The proposed development consists of two 6-unit condominium
buildings ("manor homes") on a 1.18 acre parcel (Lot 1, Block 2)
Reason for Re
Is The plan amendment is re because the SC designation
does not allow the construction of condominiums,
2. The rezoning is re as the site is currentl zoned R1
single famil residential and the construction of 12
.condominium units re an R3, multiple dwelling zoning,
BA GROUND
On August 7, 1980, the Maplewood Cit Council approved Go++,Is
Map le.view PUD subject to a number of conditions. This approval
h did not include Lot 2 (the parcel now in q uestion). It
was -felt at that time that the "frontage" road (Duluth Street)
should serve as a divide between the commercial development to the
west and the residential land to the east. Since residential uses
were initiall proposed b the applicant for this lot, it was not
included in the 1980 PUD approval .
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
_here are no specific criteria for a plan amendment decision.
Changes in the land use plan should be consistent with the
cioals policies and objectives in the City's comprehensive ple,n.
'
'Section 36-485 o+ the City Code* requires that the approval of
rezoning shall be based upon four findings. (Refer to the
+indings in the resolution on page`16).
DISCUSSION
Land. Use Transition
This property is currently designated SC, Service Commercial in
the land-use plan~ This land-use designation is intended for
commercial activities which function on a local or community-wide
scale" A w1dee variety of commercial facilities are permitted in
th distri ct., provided that the proposal is compatible with the
character and development of the neighborhood in which it is
located.
'
In review of the site and the surrounding land uses, staff has
.some reservations about the suitability of commercial development
on this corner. Allowing this property to be used for commercial
ati. ities ' while there are single-family homes on all sides,
+v « � « ould probably cause more disruption and negative impacts for the
residences than would the proposed residential development.
One of the reasons that this parcel was not included in Goff's
PUD was that the City felt that Duluth Street would serve as aa
dividing point between the commercial land uses to the west and
residential land uses to the east. While using a street as e
dividing point for different land uses may be appropriate in some
locations, it does not appear to be the best alternative in this
portion of the City. The policies in the City's land use plan
states that: "Changes in types of land use shall occur at center,
mid-block points., so that similar uxues front on the same
street. ..", The proposal to construct 12 condominium units in
this location is consistent with this design objective, as similar
uses would end up fronting on Duluth Street and a land use change
would occur at a mid. point along County Road C.
'
One of the concerns expressed by the nearby property owners With
l i the traffic that it will generate. �hiwa�ppm�osa s e ra c , The 1987
average daily traffic count for County Road C east of Highway 61
was 3300 vehicles. According to the Ramsey County Public Works
department, this volume of traffic is below the functional
capacity of the road. The Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) estimates that 1,18 acres of suburban condominium
2
-
'
`
`
'
' ^
`
development wil1 generate 73 trips per day on average. The ITE
estimates that 1.18 amcres of suburban office development w i l l
generate 352 vehicle trips per day on average" Thus it appears
that _ existing road system can handle the level of expected
`.traffic. from the condominium proposal and the amount of traf+ic
' 't|lat the proposal would generate is sIgnificant l y less than
would be generated by office development on the site...
`
�
RECOM '
1. Approve the resolution on page 15, which amends the land
use plan from SC to RM. Approval is based on the
following findings:
a.This parcel appears tobe well suited for medium
density residential development and the proposal
is consistent with Comprehensive Plan development
� policy for having changes in land uses at mid-block
and for having similar uses fronting the same street'
b. This project would have no adverse effect on
surrounding properties:
(1) The condominiums will have screening on all
sides with the proposed vegetation thus
minimizing the visual impacts of the buildings
to nearby homes.
(2) There would be no adverse effect on adjacent
property values attributable to the proposed
moultipl«e dwellings. In addition, the Ramsey
County Assessor's office has stated that it
is possible that residential properties
directly adjacent to commercial development
may not increase in value as quickly as
those lots that are farther away.
c. The traffic that would be generated by the proposal
can be adequately accommodated by the existing street
S
20 Approve the resolution on page 16 approving the rezoning
of the property in question on the basis that the four
' �r findings of fact would be met~
3
CITIZEN COMMENTS
City stof f surveyed 40 property owners within 350 feet of the
site. 0f the 19 rep l i es , one was in favor, one had no
co �
mment and 17 were opposed. The principal object were
Goff ' s fi project is not f i n i shed .
Goff had made promi that similar types of housi un its
would be built on the remainder of his property.
3s It will decrease property values in the area
S
taf f rep ly: Gee attached memorandum on page! 13.
4a It will l increase the possibility of crimes because of the
lower-.income f am i l i es
5 The buildi would be too l arge for the area
St a+ f repl All C ordinance requirements for setbacies,
bU i l d in height and overall density would be met with the-
proposal
6n 1 object to rental property
7:
There already is too much traffic on County Road Cis
Staff reply: This concern is addressed on page 3 of
the report
S . I would 1 .ik to see the natural habitat preserved.
90 The added demands to the local utility systems may be
too much of a burden on those systems .
St aff reply Adequate streets, sanitary sewe and water
serve the property in question for the proposal
10. There is
a lack of .recreation areas in the neighborhood
( c h i l d r e n are playing in the streets)
Staff reply: According to the Parks and Recreation
Director, no additional parks are planned for this area of
the C i t y . Existing parks are located at County Road C and
Cypress St reet (Kohl man Lake Park) and at Hazelwood Aven
and Barclay Street (Harvest Pare ) .
qq I chose this area to get away from apartment -type dwellings.
4
.SIFE DESCRIPTION
'
t e� i 1 18 with in� l 425 feet of 'The subject property � . acres m ��r� e �
'frontage on Duluth Street and 188.32 feet of frontage on County
`Road C. The subject property is undeveloped and has an area of
, higher ground along the west property line. There is a mix o+
'
veg etation on the site including scrub and mature trees and
shrub-type p7 ants .
SURROUNDING LAND USES
I tothewest of the subject property there is a single-
family dwelling. Farther to the west there are three other single-
�+amily homes and Lakeview Lutheran Church. To the southwest,
behind the single-family homes, is the site on which is proposed
' story office building for the headquarters of Rainbow
Cleaning Systems. Directly to the south of the site is Duluth
Btree Edgehi1l Court and Phase Three of the Mapleview PUD.
.Duluth Street is also immediately to the east of the subject
property. e t Farther to the east of the subject property are Phases
One and Two of Goff's PUD, To the north of the site is County
Road C and single-family homes on the north side of the road.
PAST ACTIONS
The Planning Commission recommended, on July 16, 1979, approval of
aw plan amendment for the realignment of the Highway 61 "frontage"
road" The Commission also recommended that the plan should
peflect the separation of lard uses by the road alignment.
The City Council approved the above amendments on July 19, 1979.
The Council also held ahearing at this time on the proposed
Highway 61 frontage road and English Street. Council ordered_
English Rtr%fmwwt as a cul-de-sac but took no action on the frontage
Goff'as Maoleview PUD and the commencing of building on the three
lots along County Road C were ' proved in 1980, The PUD approval ,
however, did not include the subject property as the proposal for
residential development on it was not consistent with the land use
- 1an .
of Goff's PUD (around Hilltop Court) and Phase Three
' d Edgehi1l Court) have subsequently been approvede '
,
�
�
PLANNING
De ns
'
Maximum allowed de�ityv. 22 people/net. acre
'Project densit 21.69 people/net acre
Land Use Policies
Land use Plan designation: SC, service commercial center. An
amendment to RM, residential medium density has been requested.
The RM land use classification is designed for single-family
homes on small lots, duplexes, townhouses, and mobile hones.
The proposed project is in compliance with Maplewood~s
- hensive Plan housing balance and mix policies fczr
the fo1lowing reasons:
1. The comprehensive pl an states:
"The City shall encourage transitional land uses,
with medium and higher-density residential development
located between low-density residential and commercial
or service land uses."
The proposed site serves as a transition between the
commercial/manufacturing land uses to the southwest and
mest, and the lower density residential areas to the
north and east.
2. In Section 74-5, comprehensive plan polic should. . X
"Accomplish transition between distinctly different
' types of residential land uses in an orderly fashion
to "*void creating a negative (economic, social or
physical) impact on adjoining developments."
Conflicts are minimized between single-family residences
to the east and west and the proposed multi -+ami1y housing
|because of changes in site topography and the applicant's
own proposal for additional berming, screening and buffering.
3. In Section 74-9, comprehensive plan policy states that the
'
'City shall uti1ize the fo1lowing:
"Residential neighborhoods shall be protected from
encroachment or intrusion of nonresidential uses
by adequate buffering and/or separation."
�11
- `
The exi re character of this area will be
further enhanced by the addition of more housing units.
This will help prevent further intrusion'from as *ell as
the negative impacts of commercial or manufacturing
��czvelop��ent which are conceivable land uses for this
r� p arcel with the SC land use designation.
40. In Section 74-12,
"High-density residential areas should be located
adjacent to or in close proximity to collectors
and arterials,"
The applicant's proposal can be considered medium-density
res idential development. Even as such, it is import/ant to
note that the site is located adjacent to a collector street
(County Road C) and is in close proximity to a principal
arterial (Highway 61).
There are two criteria for evaluating a project against the
City's housing goals - affordability and diversity.
1. The housing plan calls for the provision of 620 new housing
units to be made available to low-to-moderate income people
between 1980 and 1990. Low-to-moderate income is defined as
affordable for households that earn 80 percent or less of the
area median income. In 1988, the area median income for a
family of four was $40,700. As of October 31, 1988 888 new
low-to-moderate income housing units had been made available
in Maplewood. The excess of 268 units has been applied to the
City's modest cost housing goal that is described below.
2" The housing plan also calls for the provision of 785 new
housing units to be made available to modest-income households
between 1980 and 1990. M income is defined as affordable
+or households that earn 110 percent or less of the area median
income. As of October 31, 1988, 411 new modest-cost units had
.been made available in Maplewood. These units, together with
the excess low-to-moderate income units, leave 106 additional
' modest cost units to be provided in Maplewood by 1990.
7
w
Housing Diversity:
The housing g oals and objectives in the comprehensive plan state:
w,~he City should continue to encourage and plan +or a wide
' . of housing types."
`
.2. " City should continue to use planning principles for
'housing areas which encourage planned and developed open
"
space.
These goals should be accompanied by a policy of planning for a
certain. percentage of the City's housing stock to be somethinc.g
other than singl e-wfami1 y dwellings. In 1985, the Metropol itan
Council adopted a goal that called for each metro area community
to plan for about 41 percent of its housing units to be something
other than singl e-fami l y dwe1 l ings ~ As of September 8 , 1988,
35.6 percent of Mapl ewood 's housing units were nonsingl e fami l y
dwellings. lf the City were to be ful1y developed under its
present land use plan, about 44 percent of Mapl ewood 'ss housing
units would be something other than singl e'famil y dwel l ings .
The premises +or this. policy is that the l ong-term stability of
the community's tax base depends, in large part, upon its ability
to attract and retain residents of al l ages. To do so, a diversity
0f housing styles must be available to accommodate households in
each stage of the life cycle of housing needs, ,
In summary, this project is consistent with City housing policies
encouraging a diversit o+ housing t
gofpudamen
Attachments
1. Land Use Plan
2~ property Line/Zoning Map
3^ Site Plan
4. ' Plan
5. Staff Memo on Property Values
6^ Plan Amendment Resolution
7^ Rezoning Resolution
�
i
���I.t111Al1,9
1 •
r MaJor, colle
V
men
`4 SC — Service Comme rc i a
; M — Medium Density Residential
.-M Municipal F a c i l i t y
-RL Low Density Residential LAND USE PLA N
L'SC — Limited Service Commercial
O.S — Open Space
P — Park
BW — Business Warehouse
C — Church 9
Attachment 1
4
N
� t ' �� ���NO�1cs.s�vf —��► 3 -. - - 75
MIN 0
Cal • 4
c "+tD. m
N
- 3;� ^ ' , Lakeview
'Lutheran
40 � N
l40 Church -� ) '
-! ' .. 30
_ • Proposed
4 r Rainbow 1}
h
e Cleary r
o! �r
�r
2 is
Cie
(70)
115 Z
I T
1
•
1
GO F
44 Z A " Apr 1 4
CP
rj
co
_GON- NOR-- - - -AVE .�
- PE.•'+ED �� :x X19 , �; ._ ; + 3RD �0 s
tco '
7 44
.9� D 'JTLOT A -�
.� ., W E
AND
j
,. 17�
14
r
51 1 V
WW I
• `
w
x
v
J
P / ZONING MAP
L — Single — dwelling residential
— Planned Unit Development
— Llanz inanUTacturinq
4
N
10 Attachment 2
• t -
MN GOUNT Y F1 V G
77-41 ----�-
I
C I
' • 1 ' 6f1
• 944
• ' /
ar vlow LA NO
LOT VWVOW WOO.
• /
MNN ft., "V
, �:•�
;.. a 0 N f. f /+�� ! ht= �� LOe
V ` - , n
"IL171Pi(s 1Na4-
pot t / •frETt�IGi�- NNB
JK
T + J
x - t .
/ • ) � i � ` � ( C4 �.,_ � �l�I4TINfi �►T�?1 SCswER
0
• � � b �, ° � Isnwls �oNT �c
ter• k4ftVFL � � 0�.►1�� ��.
„ _ „ d �x nor. srvvr eavAmw
lot 44' x 72 1 4' NO
sewt� �v NO Tt1
I tA.* � NOME
" &-fL "yA'C /. �►►� ...... < �It.'AT +oN FOGS
� f /• i ��� �,MK ¢ n000un�
KA4N
r1•II OpDI►+6NT IVRaIeR
-rAi3 uLh T(0r4
.. T,.�,.aa. +r ^ �yr r• �, M r LOT Op ?A,G�o 5F OAS Ac-
' •/� . V� TO'N.- ' VWe t.l. I WO UN i rti I z D• N .
to '� ' � . •' - " NFT POMO
WL O 'a
of
C�
I�MM J _. rd. �•P�6 I 'c
f�""' ..,�, �, MWNAiPgj .VV rOpWfAPNM i3y Mlt.%+WZ w Grxa•f fr Atr�GG.
Ow' SGt7 W. Mw'I II(i St ��wtt, , MN 4sn2 (!i►Z) 4b4 - 3 ;OI
644Cfl T►trr TWIAf PLAN WA"' PPOvAaan F*'f Ma
QIZ NNt7CR MI DIOW AW rNAT S AM A►
RBGt t.AWt? ARG►tIMT NwraC:z T1+E t Aw5 CF
F1+G •iTA?� or Ni�►,+,Ne fora . f1e66 No I'IA3 t
SITE PLAN
11
I
N
Attachment 3
t
F '
G O (A O /► d G
t
t
f D is A I N A 0 L D 1 t C" 1+IT D 10 T M R IS L v
r • f1+ONR: tr(' ' tap SrLB► alc
/�P ; y •
• . a • r f �nwca -
PAA46 SPRNCp-
f MA
• � 1 � � - RED SPLDHR?R-
' 11 } • ' ialiDt.�s /►SM � oiNC �. �
1f '.•.Zj NOM ��Stt�a?�er7 ♦ice )
I '0 ro se %Cvvet7 -
A SPAt�1GE
1- FrOO4 ! t.1►+I
pt�NT' NIATE LIST
QtitArl. G LMN PN NA14* Apt Go{ ,�IA�I� _ __ -- - ZE _ �� - -
01,"141"6 6PPWlf-
1 4~OAry 15"4 so^" ASEA vNN6wr. (1N►NIn�► tv g Srlrr4iz
Z f4OFWAN Ptkf� PiNN4 R6 S RS
(i tAP'P•►bNr AP#5cv ^E f►+w^ OCZIOe rAtAs Kg
(� Rsn fpbf NanL t OA* PUW4 •• PtD SA•fNQ7R 1;t 94 on (,pl•ITP1Nt3K
�} gNpVAv pltf G4LH3. MALM4 i1 SNOWCairr " ��•� r II
Z RON�►LT7 GPr►13 M/wN�. ' "Aot, `9 11
&"W HTN . "AIL t o o�f'l•? XOf& 64aMAXOM ' *PIOV � '� Z IZ � sT�►P•E
( prnsv r WNV6N TINA GOPVATr
2 Mop KA" aew,sO * KN FOA)'Ir1U6 Mary Owl, Nt srp*t yYi" 68
AUG 3 t SM
loq°�N 06OAeO P
4
N
12 Attachment 4
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT.: The Effect of Multiple Dwellings on Adjacent Single- Dwelling Hone Values
DATE: February 7, 1985
Whenever a hearing for a multiple dwelling adjacent to single ,dwel 1 i ngs is held,
neighbors always argue that their property values will depreciate, To question
this belief is like arguing against motherhood or apple pie, In order to
separate fact from myth, I have done some research. The following is a list
of the only studies I could find in the metro area:
1. The. City of Coon Rapids (1978 -81 data) - -city assessor
This study compares the sales ratio (assessor's value /average actual
sales- price) of single dwellings over the whole city versus single d w e l l i n g s
adjacent to apartments, double dwellings and home occupations. The result
is that there was no s i g n i f i c a n t difference in the value of homes,
2. The City of Brooklyn Center (1982 -83 data) - - city assessor
This is a similar .study to that done in Coon Rapids. This study also
found no significant in the value of single dwellings adjacent
to multiple dwellings versus the average value of single dwellings city-
wide, It is interesting to note that .parks had a s l i g h t l y negative effect
on adjacent home values.
30 A study by the Bosclair Corporation for the City of Bloomington (1960 -70
sales data from Bloomington, New Hope, St. Louis Park and Edina)
This study shows that homes adjacent to multiple dwellings had a slightly
higher value
4. A study by North Star Appraisal for the City of Savage (1980 sales data
from Apple Valley and Burnsville)
This study was based on the effect of quad developments on adjacent single
dwellings. This study also found that there was no adverse effect on the
property values of adjacent homes, There was also no increase in marketing
time. A survey of-adjacent homeowners found a pos i ti ve attitude toward
the quads. Homeowners did not feel the projects reduced their property
values, polluted their vision or increased the number, of undesirables in
the neighborhood,
13 Attachment 5
50 A study by Lafayette and Ri e.rce, Inc.--real estate appraisers for Castle
Design and Development Co. (1984)
This study is based on a proposed eight — building, 64 -unit apartment development
in Maplewood called Sterling Glen. This study found that the apartments would
not be a deterrent to the overall marketability or value of adjacent hotues.
'Conclusion
Council should not base denial of a multiple dwelling project on the negative
effect on ad j aceht property values, unless there is something specific about a
project that differentiates it from multiple dwellings in general. Available
studies do not show a negative effect on property values or marketing time of
adjacent homes.
cc: Council `
Planning commission
HRA
CDRB
Associate planners
14
PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Goff ,Inc.initiated an amendment tothe-
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from SC, service c ommercia1to RM
residential-medium densit for the followin propert
This property is more commonly described as Lot 1, Block 2,
Goff~s Maplewood 2nd Addition.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as
fol,ows�
_ 1.The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing
on , 1989 to consider this plan amendment. Notice
thereo-f was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons
present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and
present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended
to the City Council that said plan amendment be '
_ 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan
amendment on v 1989. The Council considered
reports and recommendations from the planning Commission and City
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
that the above-described plan amendment be on the
basis of the fol I owing, findings of fact:
1s The parcel appears to be *ell suited for medium density
residential development serving as a transition area between land
2. The site is located adjacent to a minor arterial
3. The project wil l have no adverse effect on surrounding
Adopted this day of v 1989.
Seconded by,, A
15 Attachment 6
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and
held in the council chambers in said City on the day of
1989 t 7
' a p.m.
The following members were present:
WHEREAS, Goff Homes, Inc. initiated a rezoning from R-1, single
to R-3, multiple-dwelling residential for the following-described
property:
Lot 1, Block 2, Eoff's Mapleview 2nd Addition
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by Goff Homes, Inc., pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII o+ the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on , 1989. The Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be .
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on
, 1989 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was
published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written
statements. The Council aa1so considered reports and recommendations of
the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
_ 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose
and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the communit where applicable and the public welfare*
16 Attachment 7
4^ The proposed change would have no negative effect Lipon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and
fxacilities,'such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection
and schools.
Adopted this da of 1 19890
Seconded by Ayes--
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
�
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
}
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk
of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I'have
carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of
1989 with the original on file in my office, and
' transcript th f i f
the same iS a full, true and complete therefrom insofar as
the same relates to this rezoning.
Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City
this day of , 1989.
City Clerk
C it y of Maplewood
17
MEMORANIXJM
TO Cit Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit
LOCATION: Duluth Street
APPLICANT: Brian A. Dillon
OWNERS: Brian A. and Cind L. Dillon
James E. and Lorrain A Fenlon
PROJECT TITLE* Rainbow Cleaning S
DATE: Ma 24, 1989
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
It
Action b Council,
Endorsed
Modified
Re ected.......
Date
The applicant is re approval of a conditional use permit
(CUP) I f or a 4,925-s of f ice building. The CUP is
re becaus the proposed building would be 110 feet from the
residential district to the east.
REASON FOR THE REQUEST
Subsect ion 36-187 (b) states that in an M-1 I I ight manufacturing
district "no buil ding or exterior use , except park ing , ma be
erected,, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential
district without a conditional use permit."
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Subsection 36-442 (b) of the zoning ordinance re that ten
findings for approval be made in order to grant a CUP. (Refer to
the resolution on page 11 and to the applicant's letter on page 9
addressing these findings.)
I)ISCUSSION
Staf f -, C;1;-, y concern is that proper screening be provided al tang
the east and north side of the parking lot to buffer this
nonresidential site from the abutting residential districtse The
applicant has proposed a row of 26, six -foot -tall junipers to
provide this buffer on the east. (Refer to the landscape plan -
separate attachment.) The Design Review Board re a six -
foot-tall decorative wood fence on the north side. The Board's
conditions have been adopted b reference in the following
recommendations
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of the resolution on page 11.. approving a conditional
use permit for the proposed office building on Duluth Street.
south of Count Road C, based on the findings re b code
and subject to the following conditions:
in Adherence to the site and landscaping plans dated Ma 1
1989, with the revisions and conditions approved b the
Communit Design Review Boards,
2s This permit shall be sub Ject to review after one y ear, from
the date of approval, based on the procedures in Cit code.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staf'f mailed surve to the 27 propert owners within 350 feet
+or their comments. regarding this proposal. Of the five replies,
one was in favor, two had no comment, one stated a conditional
approval and one objected.
In Favor Comment
I have a Rainbow Cleaning S - also, don't see an problem
with traffic.
Conditional ADDroval i 123 E. County.Road C)
I would onl agree if the builder and owner put up a privac
fence six +eet high of cedar all the wa across so as to block
the view of the building from our residential houses
Staff repl The Communi-t Design Review Board is re that
a six-foot-tall,, 80% opa decorative-wood fence be installed on
the north side of the parking lot. A fence is not recommended
behind the building, since the brick structure would have a
resi dential design and would block an site activities.
Objections
I object because of added traffic on street that alread has
blind drivewa due to bends in road,
Staff repl Duluth Street is designated as a "major collector"
in the Comprehensive Plan and has been designed for the purpose
of serving the residential development to the east as well as the
commercial /industrial development to the west.
M
REFERENCE
ion.
Site Descri2t*
I . Site size: 32 .152 s f eet
2. Existing Land Use: Undeveloped. Th westerl 75 feet of the
site is the rear y ard of 1216 E. Count Road C.
Surroundin Land Uses
Northerl Single dwellings on propert zoned M-1, Light
Manu+acturing. .1230 E. Count Road C is also the,
business location of A Bear Heating and Air
Conditioning.
Southerl Duluth Street. South of Duluth Street is
undeveloped M-1 prope
Easterl Undeveloped propert that is planned for SC,
service commercial but is currentl proposed for
development with two six-unit condominium
buildings.
Westerl Lakeview Lutheran Church parking lot,
Past Action
Ma 23. 1989, the Communit Design Review Board approved site,
architectural and landscape plans and recommended approval of the
CUPS
PI anning
1. Land Use Plan designation: SC, Service Commercial
2. Zoning: M-1
il/CUPRAIN
Attachments
in Location Map
2a Propert Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan Reduction
48 Project Description Dated April 19, 1989
5. Conditional Use Permit Re Dated Ma 22, 1989
6. Resolution
7. CDRB Minutes
Go PC Minutes
9. Plans (separate attachment)
4
Interchange
Vadnais Heights
t � i
ma jor collector #,
BV
-S C
► ?
O
b _
Co. - Rd. C
i t
f
L C -.
----=
+� BW ,
Major colic
mass
BW
major arterial
Interchange
'
major
...
collect(
I�
mloor a
a
LS
.� _I
J
�-
0S
CAI r
S C _.._ R H
LS -
�VON unnuz sit■
L SC
interchange
m
t
t0
d
CD
d
L
3
HAZELWOOD
LAND USE PLAN
5 Attachment 1
4
N
l/. o • C 111-
C h �
r
v
� W � m
O C
O
•C V
low
O
r;
E
1268 1276
• 1260 & &
Lakeview Lutheran &
Church 2 1270 1278
G0 FE' APL VIEW ADD.
12 Cl 1210
o -'
f ak
— —
�' . • • �� �'� i �, - •
I .5 3 1A 3 1411 it
o ,
'�'
, S $ o
5D ; f,� Ag V.
�o N N t(/ ,
C. ♦ • w ' �'� (IOC Ti
AC 17Z
ea UILO)
fro
,, > > a ,>
JiL
61
ft,.j . . .. ...
OV
31
cit
(77 14
(' �• 4
+� k t� 6 ��O •• 101 )o o
UJ
t ow j t f k7„ , , � $�� ,,
,. f 1 O 1 2 / t c - r 10 14
7)
•I Q ~ 1 17
�8) OAP ej
p D I' I NG + Z
-/ -
Mitsubishi
jab
( 0 0 7.1 ! loo: •S/. } �� ''J 17
1 3 S— 3 3 1
' 47x Cy ' E t
o 1 a - � 9 { 4 r , 13- o • 9'
� 1 o��,.t� - lac 2283..55 .. - • S• O ; h J I C10 O J x
'A D
GO R
JCPFVVED C., o« 2 Z-qh im 6.4 �� •, -a, .. , 3RD• �• � use a� �
goo � 10 �� � '•' ; � P Q,L � � t, � A F
7; • a ..
t--Q i 9 C OUTLOT A —` 1, UL
Nis n LAND
_
.� t WET LA
1 3:� 5 3 a 35'
_._.._
.,� 101.E r
W.
CL to
37 .r
,: 14
14' o- s�)
�..-
- /
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
6 Attachment 2
4
N
•
V
W
O
O
W
SITE PLAN
7
a.
W*W& Ord &mw~
i�
w
•
sT -
o v ,
Attachment 3
4
N
0
April 19,1989
Mr. Geoff Olson, Director
Community Development
Maplewood City Hall
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
SUETOW ANO ASSOCIATES INC.
ARCHITECTS ANO ENGINEERS
2345 RICE STREET SUITE 810
ST. PAUL MILANE WOTA 66113
TEL. Slit /483 -6701
Re: Office Building for Brian Dillon
BA #8909
Dear Mr. Olson:
The following, is a Letter of Description pertaining to this project.
1. The proposed builddng is to house the headquarters of Rainbow Cleaning System, and
will contain Administrative offices, an appliance service space, a meeting and training
area, and an enclosed garage.
Rainbow Cleaning System Serves as the Minnesota distributor of Rainbow Vacuum
Cleaning Appliances.
2. This site is zoned Ml and is bounded by the M1 zone to the north west and south of the
property. An R1 zone is immediately adjacent to the east of the property.
3. The proposed building design bas been prepared to be visually compatible with potential
future residential development. The - design exhibits brick veneer, wooden trim and
sloped roofs.
4. The proposed paved driveway and parking areas contain sufficient area for a number of
automobile parking stalls 1.75 times greater than as required by City Ordinance. A
proposed future access to the adjacent Lakeview Lutheran Church automobile parking
area is also proposed.
We look forward to the Community Design Review Board's approval of this project.
a
Please advise if you have any comments or questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
BUETOW &ASSOCIATES, INC.
(2
y L. ngel
Vi Presi ent
cC. \ Brian Dillon
0
Attachment 4
MAY Q i 1989
MAY 2 2 1989
SUETOW AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS
2345 RICE STREET SUITE 210
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113
T E.L . 612/483-6701
May 22, 1989
Mr. Thomas: Ekstrand, Assistant Director
Community Development
Maplewood City Hall
1830 Bast County Road B
Maplewood, Mn. 55109
Re: Office Building for Brian Dillon
BA #8909
Dear Mr. Olson:
The following additional information has been prepared at your request in compliance with the
requirements for Conditional use Permit Applications.
We hereby request, on behalf of our client, approval of his Conditional Use Permit Application
of April 19, 1989 since it fulfills the following criteria set forth by the City of Maplewood:
(1) The proposed use is in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan as it is planned to
contain administrative offices, meeting and training spaces and service spaced conducive
to the conduct of business for Rainbow Cleaning System, Inc. (Refer also to our
Y019/89 Letter of Description).
(2) The establishment and maintenance of use will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or general welfare. Its use will encompass those described in sentence (1) above.
(3) The proposed . use is planned to be located., designed and maintained in compliance with
the requirements and nature of the Ml Zoning District in which it is located. The
building is designed to be visually compatible with potential future residential
ciP. , Ptnr , mPnt that could occur on adjacent land parcels.
(4) This new use is expected to improve adjoining property values since some adjoining
parcels do not contain building structures.
(5) The proposed use is planned not to be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present
and potential surrounding land use as described in sentences (1) and (3) above..
(6) The vehicular traffic development by this use is expected to generate vehicular traffic on
local streets typical for a headquarters building of this type and size. Street access,
parking stall numbers and ease of vehicular movement have been addressed in the
previously submitted Site Plan. Vehicular movement problems will, thus, be avoided.
(7) Essential public services, provided by the City of Maplewood, will serve this site.
(8) There will be no excessive additional public service requirements or facilities required
nor created by the establishment of this use upon this site.
9 Attachment 5
Page 2
5/22/89
(9) The existing natural site features will be preserved where possible and, especially, at the
periphery of the property, where views from adjoining uses would originate.
(10) Minimal adverse environmental effects if any, upon adjoining land use will occur with
the development of this facility and its adjoining grounds.
We look forward to the Conmi um'ty Design Review Board's approval of this project.
Please advise if you have any comments or questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
BUETOW &ASSOCIATES, INC.
Randy ngel
Vice President
cc: Brian Dillon
10
Pursuant to due cal I and notice thereof a regul ar meeting of the
Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota was dul called and held
in the Council chambers in said Cit on the da of
4 ) 1989 at 7 p .m .
The following members were present:
The +ol I owing members were absent:
WHEREAS, Brian A. Dillon initiated a conditional use permit to
build an office building in an M-1, light-manufacturing district,
within 350 feet of a residential district, at the following-described
propert
The East 150 f eet of Lot 11 W a H . HOWARDS GARDEN LOTS , Ramse
Count Minnesota l North of the following described line:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 9, Township 29,
Range 22 thence West, assumed bearing, a distance of 498.57 feet
thence South a distance of 126 feet thence Southwesterl along a
tangential curve, concave to the Northwest, the central angle
being 90 degrees, radius 300 feet, a distance of 471.24 feet
thence Southwesterl along a tangential curve., concave to the
Southeast, the cental angle being E39 degrees 13 minutes,, 15
seconds, radius 283.60 feet, a distance of 441.62 feet and there
terminating.
Except the North 230 feet and subject to Duluth Avenue over the
Southerl 30 feet thereof.
Together with
The West 75 feet of the East 225 feet of Lot 11 I W. H. Howards Barden
Lots, Ramse Count Minnesota, l North of the centerline of
Dul uth Street, except the North 230 feet thereof .
WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this conditional use permit is
as f 011 ows:
in This conditional use permit was reviewed b the Maplewood
Planning Commission on June 5, 1989, The Planning Commission
recommended to the Cit Council that said permit be
28. The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearing an
9 1989, Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said
hearing were given an opportunit to be heard and present
Attachment 6
written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations of the Cit staff and Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT
the above-described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of
the following findings--of-facts.
is The use is i,'n conformit with the Cit comprehensive plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2a The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be
detrimental to the public health, safet or general welfare.
3w The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated
to be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4a The use would not depreciate propert values.
5a The use would not be hazardous detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the
noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution.
water run-o+f vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances,
6 The use would generate onl minimal vehicular traffic on
local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe
access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the
area properties,
7w The use would be serviced b essential public services, such
as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and
parks
so The use would not create excessive additional re at
public cost for public facilities and services and would not
be, detrimental to the welfare of the Cit
90 The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
100 The use would cause minimal adverse lenv i ronmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
is Adherence to the site and landscaping plans, dated Ma 1
198.9, with the revisions and conditions approved b the
Communit Design Review Board,
2a This permit, shall be subject to review after one y ear from
the date of approval . based on the procedures in Cit Code .f
12
Adopted this da of 19898
Seconded b A
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY' SSW
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I the undersigned being the dul y q ual if ied and appointed Cl erk
of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereb certif that I have
carefull compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a
regul ar meeting of the Cit of M►pl ewood , hel d on the da of
1989, with the original on file in m office, and the
same is a f ul I true and comp ete transcript insof ar as the same
relates to a conditional use permit,
Witness m hand as such Cl erk and the corporate seal of the Cit
this da of 9 19898
Cit Cl erk
Cit of Maplewood
13
' Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes 5-23-89
2' Buil di -mounted tenant be placed within
the des sign band own on the plans.
319 �aYl signs l be set at� least 12 inches from
as
the
4. Build indi�/id�al letters not
to ex s (24") in height for
'
leased areas less inclu�ing 4,500 square
feet; or thirty (36°) in height for
leased areas la r ^�,500 square feet. Logos
are permitted. ^�
5, Tenant all consi of
of
ndividually
illuminated minum/acr\1not ced letters. Sign
letters omponents sh have exposed neon or
other lam
6. All stor fronts shall have an ss clearly
dispY . _
Boardmemb �
rHol der seconded A all
VI, DESIGN REVIEW
A. Building and Site Review: Rainbow Cleaning Systems
' Duluth Street
Randy Engel and Brian Dillon, the applicant, were present
at the meeting. Chairman Moe asked for comments from the
audience. There were no comments. Mr. Engel said that
he was in agreement with installing evergreens along the
northerly 1 o line, where the parking lot will be
located, instead of a fence. Mr" Engel said that it was
in Mr. Dillon~s business interest to keep the landscaping
attractive and well-cared for, but he did not think an
inground sprinkling. system should be required as a
condition of approval . A board member said that the
` building may be sold in the future and there may be
problems with the Upkeep of the landscaping at that time.
Boardmember Anitzberger moved approval of plans date-
stamped May 1, 1989, for the Rainbow Cleaning Systems
off building on Duluth Street, subJect to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant must obtain a conditional use permit
from the City Council before a building permit can
be issued.
' Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes 5-23-89
2. /Al trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening
enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall
be a color and material compatible with the
building. Enclosures shall be protected by
concrete-filled steel posts, or the equivalent
anchored in the ground at the front corners of the
etructu~e~ If the enclosure is masonry, the
protective posts ma be omitted.
3. Any exterior building or roof-mounted equipment
shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view.
4. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City
Engineer, shall be Submitted prior to the issuance
of a building permit for erosion control during
5. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous
areas shall have continuous concrete curbing.
Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of
repair,
'
6. If construction has not begun within two years of
l Board review hall be repeated.
approval, oa rev w s p .
7. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall ^
be directed or shielded so not to cause any undue
glare onto adjacent properties or roadways.
.
8, If any adjacent property is disturbed or property
irons removed due to construction of the site, that
property shall be restored and irons replaced by the
applice/nt.
V. Brading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject
to the City Engineer's approval~
10. All required landscape areas shall be continually
and properly maintained. All required plant
materials that die shall be replaced by the owner
within one year. All grass areas shall be sod, not
seed.
11. The landscape plan shall be revised as follows:
a. The seven Pfitzer junipers
spruce proposed east of the
shall be omitted since they
view of oncoming west-bound
Street. There shall be two
placed in this area.
and the Black Hills
entrance drive
would block the
traffic on Duluth
Norway maples
Community Design Review Board -4-
.Minutes 5-23-89 `
_ b ~ The 26 junipers proposed within the 20-foot
setback area east of the parking lot, shall be
can upright variety, at least 6 feet tall upon
planting (es the planting schedule states) .
12. A refleactorized stop sign and a handicap parking
sign shall be provided.
13~ All publIc boulevard that is disturbed due to this
construction shall be restored and resodded, not
reseeded.
14. Proper building addresses shall be installed,
sLtbject to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
-
`
15 . Signage is not part of this approval . Signs w i l l be
reviewed by staff.
16" The site plan shall be revised to provide:
A five-foot parking lot setback from the
westerly lot line;
b. A six-foot-tall, 80% opaque screen shall be
installed along the north lot line from the
northeast corner of the building to a point
even with the east edge of the parking lot.
This screen shall consist of any combination of
evergreen plantings, berming, or retaining
wall.
17. The building exterior shall be continually and
|properly maintained.
18. An inground sprinkling system shall be installed for
all landscaped areas.
19. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the deed(s)
splitting the westerly 75 feet of the site from 1216
E. COUnty Road C and the combining of this tract
with the balance of the site shall be recordeci.
..
20. The "future access" to the church parking lot to the
' west shall be subject to staff approval , The
driveway to the west lot 1ine shall not be installed
until all elements of t h i s connection are approved.
Temporary curbing, Subject to staff approval, shall
be installed in the interim to close the west end of
' the parking lot.
'
.Community Design Review Board -5-
Minutes 5-23-89
21. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee in
ax form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150° ' of
the estimated cost of any site improvements that are
not completed by occupancy,
Boardm mb Molin seconded Ayes--all
��. ding and Site Review: Maplewood Auto Service
Brent Krause.o+ Construction 70, the eneral
Contra tor of this project, and Ken ordb NAR
_ ts were present at th me v�rause
said the intended to install an derground
irrigatio system7as-the do in 11 of their
. ___ . _~~^~ WOL1 d 1zke the
~t..a `=, basement rather
than Underg OUnd so they will be more accessible,
nr. /.rause a o stated they like to
incorporate t e existing ev r9reens on the westerly
Boardmember
Eric m approval of the plans
date M , for the Maplewood Auto
Service Center at and White Bear Avenues, '
i" Approval of pi s by the Community Design
'
Review not constitute approval of a
'0 \
2D All trash o mps ter shal I be stored in
screening nclOSUre with a 1007- opaque wooden
gate and all be a lor and material
Compatibl with the b ilding Enclosures shall
be ed by conc -filled steel posts, or
the lenL, anch he ground at the
front orners.of the str tUre. If the
enclo ire is masonry, the rotective posts may
be om tted. �
3,
An y e
sha I be decorativel scr an d from
V we The desiq-n and appear_ e of the
s reening shall be subject to he Design Review
'`ova/ ,
4n An erosion control plan, accepta e to the City
Engineer, shall be submitted prior to the
issuance of a building permit for s i on
� m�-o
" controY during construction. `
Planning Commission-3_
"inutes 6-5-89
`
the time the prope-ty is d
"=""^=siouer Ayers
Planning COMM issic)n
----'e`^d °"pp''uv=*« 0
th conditional use permit
resolution ^t^o.. ror the c of a house addition
over the m=" 'age at 15 Sterling Street North
Approval is based �
findings rui' ^
ApprApproval fm_d by
. Approval code A / i or iodefinite time period.
Commissioner � �
�� er seconded Ayes--Axdahl ,
� Ayers, Barrett,
Card inal , Fiol a ,
� Fischer
B.
Conditional Use Permit: Duluth St. (Rainbow
Clecaoing Systems)
The staff report was presented by Secretary Olson
It was reported the site plan showed the driveway
were too close to the curb, which would require this
item to be resubmitted to the Community Design
Review Board for approval .
Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission
recommend adoption of the resolution approving a
conditional use permit for the proposed office
buildinc g on b uluth Street, south of County Road C
based on the findings required by code and subjec � '
to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site and landscaping plans
dated May 1 1989, with the current and future
revisions.and conditions approved by the
Community Design Review Board,
2. This permit shall be subject to review after
one year from the date of approval, based on
the procedures in City code.
Commissioner
Ayers seconded Ayes Ayers,
Barrett, Cardinal,
Fiola, Fischer
C . Code Amend t Pi pel in Setbac�--: OrdinancF--�
Secretary u/nmo
"=�.=`� staff report on this
.=qU=st to reaop d amend the pipeline setback
ordinance. The co issioners discussed the- problem
' of existing lots hi h don't meet the pipeline
setback- and, efor these property owners would
not be allowed to add� garage or addition. It was
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Michael McGuire
Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Coll i ns
Application For Liquor License
May 15, 1989
.pct i on by g ounc 11 :)
Endorsed
Modif i ed,...,_.�,
ReJ ected
Dat
Introduction
Eileen P. Godbout has made application for an intoxicating liquor 1 i cense
at 1734 Adolphus Street (Fox and Hounds)..
Background
An investigation has been' on this individual. She has. no known
contacts with the police, nor we find that she holds a liquor license
in any other establishment in the state.
Recommendation
After a careful background investi on this individual and discussions
with her, I do not find Buff i ent reason to deny. her application for an
intoxicating liquor 1 i cense,
Action Required
Application for i ntoxicating 1 i quor license for City Council review and
approval or denial 4'
KVC:js
cc City Clerk /
Liquor File ✓
89- 003540
o " I
7
,• 1
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
APPLICATION FOR EMXICArMG LIQUOR LICENSE
TSIS APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE.
Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be
doomed guilty- of perjury - and shall be punished accordingly.
In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor-
poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part.
nership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership.
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED
10 i Eileen lab,. lia- rGahnllt ,� ae Manager
( Individual owner, officerr or partner)
for and In behalf of myse l f
hereby apply for an On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at - 17 Ado
In the City of
(Give address and local description)
Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No.
96 of Maplewood.
L Give applicants' date of birth:
2 January 1954
(Day) (Month) (y "r)
S. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows:
1405 1nollwood Lane mandot& Minnesota
_1098 ivy Hill Drive, M_ endota Heights, M innesota
d. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? ye
If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio
If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner.
wa
l
b. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address._...
Charle Alfre GoBbout 1405 Knollwood Lane, Mendota Heights, Minnesota
6. what occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years?
housemaker and co- manager of The Coachm Restaurant, 1192 North Dale 1
Street, St. Paul, Minnesota ,,,�.
i•
7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner NA
If a corporation, date of incorporatio NA _www..w.a._w__......`...r.. state in
• which incorpora ______. .; amount of authorized capitalisation
amount of paid in capi tal.._....__...___._._w.__, -
if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta .._._._.. ._..�.. ._..
give purpose of corporatio _...._...__ ______...w._.�..._..._._.._�,�. _
name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each:
(Nara,) (Addhs.) (City)
If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this
State? .__.___. Number of certificate of authority
If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and
8yLavvs. •
S. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? - At
9. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified?
LsCS Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license?
Yes.
10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school?
No State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or chu rch.__.r_.._
1/3 mile
11. State name and address of owner of building...._ partnership
has owner of building any connection, directly or in-
directly, with applicant? No
12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? No
18. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application
for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details
None
• 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately
preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for
any violation of such laws or local ordinances; it so, give date and detail n e ,`...
I
16. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years
ware ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or
under Federal lAws, and if so, give date and detail None
16. Is applicant, or any of his associates In this application, a member of the governing body of the
Municipality in which this license is to be issued? N_- --o._.... If so, in what capacity?
17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest In the furniture,
fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details
AM Minnesota General Partner hi and
U&M Enterprises, Inc.
See attached copies of option and mane ement a r m t
18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment
in the State of Minnesota? __ wo, Give name and address of such establishmen
18. Furnish the ames and addresses of at least three business references, Including ne bank refer-
r-
e
enc Commercial State Bank, Sth and St . Peter Streets, St. Paul, Minnesota
• New York Tea /Syeco, 818 Vandalia, St. Paul, Minnesota
Griggs Cooper i Co., 489 N. Prior, St. Paul, Minnesota
20. Do you possess a retail dealer's Identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner
which will expire December Slat of this year? Give number of sam applied for
21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? No
22. State whether applicant intends to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on
the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice, gam-
bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei Absolutely not
23. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive
from any other business establishment?- Yes.
24. State trade name to be u Fox and Hounds
26. State name of person that will operate store._.. 1 i cant
26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number applied for
27. If off sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? _____..., If so,
state number of motor vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year
NA
28. If you are building a new building for the purposes for which this application is beiAg made, please
submit plans and specifications with this application.
28. Financing of the construction of this building will be as follows:
NA
30. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state-
went of each partner.
81. Give description of type of operation if this Is an on-sale license application (i.e. whether cock -
tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other
• pertinent data).
Lounge seating 65
Restaurant seatin 220
2 ban go at rooms seating 290
82. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the
answer to No. 81 above - Q- Aneg$r_The coaehman-Bestanrant 1 , 1 92 No Dale Street.
8t. Paul, Minnesota, last 3 years and other work experiences in like
agt,bl iahmen (Hy bon + Hst' no s e linneanta and Qouth en � lllb
St. Paul, Minnesota)
38. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State
of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations
promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and
I hereby certify that 1 have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions
are true of my own knowledge.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this (Signature o f Applicant)
28th day of g4b ry 18.x. dP
. _7 7 r ROBERT A. GEARIN
" NOTARY PUtlI.IC • MINNEBpTA
�''-'�"''"' RAMSEY COUNTY
My commtsalon sxp1m 10.5-94
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK
FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD.
CITY of MAPLEWOOD
1830 E. COUNTY RD. 6, MAPLEINOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
CITY CLERK No. V 9469
,
� DATE
DESCRIPTION
PEAWLIC.
AMOUNT
FUND
OBJECT
PROG.
DIV.
f, "
..?
C
+�
AI
T
1
1Y
r
TMAL
'J ;� G%
CHECK. CASH Q
RECEIVED BY
;''41EARiN AND SHIELY
. , , P.A.
• RAC. ACCOUNT 18879
-ArPOWWO AT LAW
,00 DEGREE OF HONOR BUILDING
ST. PAUL, MINN 55101 1 ` - /� A/ o
PAY TO THE
ORDER OF
,.� $
�. D O L L A R
N - T - •4 '
w - � Saint
Paul OfAq DRAWN AND �NELY P
S wt�irttr o ACCOUNT
.A.
110 120 5 2 3 3011
y '•, +'""' ` r ,� ��`` ►,.' ° n" Q*CK 0 DMJVWM fOA rAVMENT
ON THE ACCOUNTS
W10MIN ABOVE. ,..•t'!r"►. ... � �v /
� '! .. .. r: �..- :.••• .1wY. :.� ki1 •� '*rt e dew •.... ... ...... _ . . w „ � s: : r' ' `>•• R. • � ~
MARCH 1, 1989
CITY Or MAPLEWOOD
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
TO WHOM I T MAY CONCERN
I, THE UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT I HOLD NO INTEREST I N ANY OTHER L I QUOR
LICENSE, EITHER ON -SALE OR OFF -SALE, IN THE
STATE Of MINNESOTA OR ANY OTHER STATE.
YOURS TRULY,
or.
zo
EILEEN P. GODBOUT
•
,i
BODERMAN &ASSOCIATES
CERTIFIED P AC
MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE
OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Eileen Godbout
1405 :Knol lwood Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
WEIL WM RMAN, CPA
ANDIREW RVHLANQ. CPA
MICHAEL ARNOLD. CPA
THOMAS wAHL9EAG. CPA
We have compiled the accompanying statement of financial
condition of Eileen Godbout as of March 1, 1989, in accordance
with standards established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants.
A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial
statements information that is the representation of. the
individuals whose financial statements are presented. We have
not audited or reviewed the accompanying statement of financial
Condition and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any
other form of assurance on it.
SORE RMAN & ASSOCIATES
Certified Public Accountants
March 1, 1989
Plymouth, Minnesota
Plymouth CrtsWew OP* Budding a 12M IndultrW Park bwd • Suke 100 a Plymouth. MN SU41 9 (612) 553.9800
•JeN
E I DEEN . GODBOUT
Statement: of . Financial Condition
March 1, 1989
ASSETS
Cash
Investments
Real property
594 W* Maryland
- 572 W. Maryland
Residence
Personal effects
LIABILITIES
Mortgage payable, Commercial State Bank
Contract for deed
ESTIMATED INCOME TAXES, on the differences
between the estimated current values of
assets and the estimated current amounts
of liabilities and their tax bases
NET WORTH
0
# 1
25,000
25 , 000
137,500
13,000
202,300
$ 73,000
4,050
$ 77 , 050
6, 000
119,250
$.202,300
See noteis to f isioan ;ial a latements
pe 1 1: 37 BODERMP#q & ASSOC
P, 414
EILEEN GODBOUT •
Notes to Financial Statements
March 1, 1989
NOTE A - BASIS OF ACCOUN
The accompanying statement of' � � •
f financial cond incl
sets and liabilities of Eileen
the assets
stated at their n GodbQUt. Assets are
estimated current amounts. Asset
jointly with her husband � owned
. Charles, are reflected at
1 value or liability pr 50 $ of
tots
599 W. Ma Y operty owned j oi.nt,ly include
ryland, 572 W. Maryland, and t s
. he r esidence,
NOTE B - INVESTMENTS
The current Value
of the real property locate
572 Maryland is th d at 594 and
e estimated current fair market val
These two properties g enerate - ue.
month, `� total. rentals of $1, 8 2 S
per
NOTE C - RESIDENCE
} The estimated current .
value of the residence is its
price plus $10,000. purchase
NOTE D - MORTGAGE PAYABLE
G
The mortgage (collateralized by the residence) is payable in
monthly installments of ;500 plus interest at I/2 percent
over the prime rate.
NOTE E - CONTRACT FOR DEED
The contract for deed on 572 W. Maryland is payable in
percent.
monthly installments of ;286.70 with interest at 7 1/2