Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 02-27 City Council PacketAMENDED AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday, February 27, 1989 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 89 - 5 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 88 - 27 (November 14, 1988) __(D) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (E) CONSENT AGENDA I.. Approval of Claims 2. Time Extension: Gervais Overlook Preliminary Plat (Sec. 4) 3. Ordinance Providing Workers Compensation Coverage For Elected Officials (2nd Reading) 4. Application For Cancellation of Ambulance Bill 5. Budget Transfer For N.E.S.T. Costs 6. Grading and Watermain - Sterling St., Proj. 87 -45, Acceptance of Project 7. Signal System Painting: - - Budget Transfer 8. Plan Approval - McKnight Road, Phase III, Project 87 -05 (F) PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 - County Road D (4 Votes) Proj. 88 -12 2. 7:10 P.M., Carey Heights Drive - Proj. 88 -09 (4 Votes) 3. 7:20 P.M., Variance: Crestview Drive (Sec. 1 -28) - Schlangen 4. 7:30 P.M., Rezoning: 2811 White Bear Ave. (Sec. 2) - 4 Votes 5, 7:40 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: Roselawn Ave. (Sec. 18) - St. Paul Water Utility 6. 7 :50 P.M., Street Vacation: Cope Ave. & Duluth St. (Sec. 9) - 4 Votes For Recommendation 2 7. 8:00 P.M., Code Amendment: Zoning Initiation (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) (G) AWARD OF BIDS 1. Gervais Ave., English St. to Mn. Dot Driveway (Proj. 88 -14) (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Conditional Use Permit or Rezoning: (Sec. 34) 2. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1810 County Road B (Fulk) - (Sec. 1-4) (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Code Amendment: Pipeline Setback Ordinance 2. Contract Approval & Budget Transfer: Planning Consultant 3. Planning Commission Annual Report 4. Ariel St., Cope- Castle, Proj. 88 -15 - Schedule Public Hearing 5. Stillwater Water Tower, Proj. 86 -03 - Final Payment 6. Hillcrest Sanitary Sewer, Proj. 86 -22, Change Order No. 5 7. Remote Water Meter Contract 8. Consider Sale of Old City Hall (J) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (K) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8, 9. 10, 11. 12. (L) ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS County Road D (Maple Knoll Apts.) (M) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 14, 1988 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting 88 - 27 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order by Mayor Greavu at 7:02 P.M. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Frances L. Juker, Councilmember George F. Rossbach, Councilmember C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Present Absent Bastian arrived at 7:15 P.M. Present Present 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -23 (October 3, 1988) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 88 -23 (October 3, 1988) as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. N.E.S. T. 2. School Board 3. Flashing Signs 4. I -14, Payrate for CSO 5. I -15, Future Meeting Dates Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Rossbach moved, seconded by Councilmember approve the Consent Agenda Items E -1 through E -11 as re 1. Approval of Claims Approved payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 584,054.03 Checks #8302 - #8387 Dated 10 -11 -88 thru 10 -31 -88 70,729.42 Checks #4441 - #4578 Dated 11 -14 -88 - all $ 654,783.45 Total per attached voucher /check register 11/14 PAYROLL: $ 166,228.39 30,998.82 $ 197,227.21 $ 852,010.66 Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Suburban Home Share Program Approved the joint - powers agreement to participate in the 1989 Suburban Home Share Program and authorize the Manager and Mayor to sign the document. 9 Budget Change - Curbside Recycling Approved the recommendation to increase the estimated revenues by $15,265 to equal the Ramsey County grant money to be received for 1988, and increase expenditure accounts 101 - 703 -A480 by $980 and 101- 701 -4330 by $14,285. 4 Water District 8 Elevated Tank, Project 86 -15 Change Order Two. Resolution No. 88 - 11 - 181 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86 -15 and has let a construction con- tract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 -15 Change Order Two. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Two. 5 Cope Avenue Project 85 -26 - Award of Bids Resolution No. 88 - 11 - 182 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Brown & Cris, Inc., in the amount of $376,635.38 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Cope Avenue - Hazel Street to Ariel Street, City Project 85 -26, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Beam Avenue Trunk Watermain, Project 84 -12 - Change Order No. 5 and Acceptance of Project. Resolution No. 88 - 11 - 183 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined - 2 - 11/14 that Beam Avenue Trunk Water Main, City Project 84 -12, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 84 -12 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the City. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. 7. Approval of Election Judges Resolution No. 88 - 11 184 RESOLVED that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1988 General Election, Tuesday, November 8, 1988: Precinct #1 Karl Biebighauser, Orpha Getty Irene Ling Claire Healy Kathy Berqual Precinct #2 Precinct #8 Chairman Lorraine Fischer, Chairman Betty Berglund Rita Frederickson Nancy Behr Precinct #9 Dolores Mallet, Chairman Margaret McDonald Ruth Myckleby -Lang Bernadine Mortinson Delores Shipp Pat Thompson, Chairman Kathleen Dittel Bea Hendricks Florence Stella Helen Dickson Precinct #3 Charlene Arbuckle, Doris Broady Alice Miller Margaret Earley Richard Wolszon Precinct #4 Caroline Warner, Betty Eddy Joyce Lipinski Thelma Ling LeAnn Kaup Precinct #5 Precinct #10 Pat Werden, Chairman Chairman Mary Lou Lieder Diane Golaski Anne Fosburgh Precinct #11 Shirley Luttrell, Chairman Maxine Olson Chairman Delores Lofgren Kathy Haynes Helen King Precinct #12 Elsie Wiegert, chairman Emma Klebe Phyllis Erickson Annette LaCasse Gloria Zuercher Mary Libhardt, Chairman DeLoris Fastner Marcella Watson Raymond Getty - 3 - 11/14 Precinct #6 Kathy Supan, Chairman Gunborg Mowchan Linda Prigge Judy Widholm Sandy Jones Precinct #7 Margaret Wolszon, Chairman Betty Haas Armella Podgorski Joan Cottrell Mildred Burke Precinct #13 Jack Arbuckle, Chairman Donald Wiegert Bill Schnellman Richard Lofgren Theodore Haas Precinct #14 Marilyn Wold, Chairman Grace Locke Kathleen Tracy Marjorie Lee Elsie Anderson 8. Ordinance to Increase Hydrant Charge Rates ORDINANCE NO. 634 AN ORDINANCE AMENDINQ THE MAPLEWOOD CODE RELATING TO HYDRANT CHARGE RATES BE IT ORDAINED BY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 35 -52 of the Maplewood Code is hereby adopted to read as follows: There shall be levied a hydrant charge against all properties benefiting from fire protection created by the availability of water. Such charge shall be imposed only'within the St. Paul Water District service area where water mains are located. The hydrant charge shall be levied whether or not the property is connected to water mains. The rates shall be as follows: (1) The quarterly residential rates shall be: Single Family Dwelling $3.25 Townhouse 3.25 Duplex 6.50 Apartment 2.60 Condominium 3.25 Mobile Home 3.25 (2) Non - residential rates shall be as follows: Class A - over 300 MGY - $.08 per 1,000 gallons Class B - 0 -299 MGY - $.12 per 1,000 gallons Minimum rate - $3.25 per quarter (3) The rate for properties used jointly for residential and commercial purposes that are not metered separately shall be billed at non - residential rates. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force beginning January 1, 1989. - 4 - 11/14 9. Write -Off of Uncollectible Ambulance Bills of 1986 Approved that the $5,034.68 of ambulance bills as presented be written off as uncollectible. 10. Investment Policies Resolution No. 88 - 11 - 185 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is dedicated to the proposition that a sound investment program is an essential element of good fiscal management; and WHEREAS, it is important to have a written policy to aid in the invest- ment process; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD that the policy entitled "Investment Policy for the City of Maplewood" be adopted as the official investment policy for the City of Maplewood effective January 1, 1989. 11. Letter of Resignation: Susanne Hoyt, H.R.A. Accepted the resignation of Susanne Hoyt from the Human Relations Commission with regrets and a letter of appreciation be sent. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Financing Revisions: Cottages of Maplewood a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the change of developers for the Cottages of Maplewood.' b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Howard Rikstad, representing the developers, spoke on behalf of the change. d. Mary Ippel, Bonding Consultant, Briggs and Morgan, explained the specifics of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 11 - 186 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI- FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE PROGRAM PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AUTHORIING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO ISSUE HOUSING REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING THE - 5 - 11/14 SUBMISSION OF FINANCING PROGRAM FOR APPROVAL TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SAID PROJECT AND PROGRAM (THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act ") confers upon cities, or housing and redevelopment authorities or port authorities authorized by ordinance to exercise on behalf of a City the powers conferred by the Act, the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multi - family housing developments within the boundaries of the City; (b) The City received from The Arkell Development Corporation a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project herein- after described, through the issuance of revenue bonds as hereinafter described; (c) The City held a public hearing on December 14, 1987, on the proposal of The Arkell Development Corporation to finance the Project hereinafter described and granted preliminary approval for the Project on said date; (d) The interests of The Arkell Development Corporation in the Project will be assigned to Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership; (e)- The City has received from Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partner- ship (the "Developer ") a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act the Project originally granted preliminary approval before assigned by The Arkell Development Corporation to the Developer, and as more fully described hereinafter; (f) The city desires to: facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the develop- ment of housing facilities designed for occupancy by elderly persons; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives. (g) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development. The Project to be financed by the bonds is the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 48,000 square foot (approxi- mately) multifamily rental housing development of approximately 60 rental units located south of Woodlynn Avenue & East of Ariel Street, in the City of Maplewood, and consists of the construction and equipping of buildings thereon which will result in the provision of additional ren- tal housing opportunities to persons within the community; - 6 - 11/14 (h) The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible; (i) A public hearimg on the Project and the financing program therefor was held on December 14, 1987 and November 14, 1988, after notice was published, all as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05, subd. 5, at which public hearing all those appearing at said hearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted and considered; (j) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the acquisi- tion and construction of multi - family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $2,600,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition and construction of the Project; and said agreement may also pro- vide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the pur- chasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City, acting by and through the City, hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions; 2. At the option of the City, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be consented to by the Developer. 3. On the basis of information available to the City it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multi - family housing develop- ment within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi - family senior rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, and to promote more intensive develop- ment and use of land within the City; - 7 - 11/14 4. The Project and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the financing program by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ( "MHFA ") and subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the project; 5. In accordance with subdivision 5 of section 462C.05, Minnesota Statutes, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to submit the program for financing the project to MHFA, requesting its approval, and other officers, and employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide MHFA with pre- liminary information as it may require; 6. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer; 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval; 8. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to�the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exer- cise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City, except such property as may be expressly pledged for the security of the Bonds. The bonds shall recite in substance that Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 9. In anticipation of the approval by MHFA and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Projects and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby author- ized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 10. The actions of City Staff in causing the notice of public hearing to be published in the "Maplewood Review" are hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted. 11. The Developer shall enter into various agreements with the City which shall impose the following restrictions on the Developer and the Project: - 8 - 11/14 (a) Construction must begin by June 1, 1989. The City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is shown. (b) Contracts entered into with Contractors doing work on the Project shall provide that: (i) The Contractor shall not discriminate in the hiring or firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. (ii) the Contractor shall compensate employees with wages and financial remuneration as provided under the United States Code, Section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.44. (iii) the Contractor shall be required to employ Minnesota resi- dents in at least 80% of the jobs created by the project; and, at least 60% of the group shall be residents of the seven- county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categories shall be determined as of the date of this resolution. However' if the contractor can show that these quotas are not feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specific skills, the contractor may request the City Council for a release from the two resi- dency requirements. The requirements shall continue for the duration of the construction project. (iv) the Contractor shall be an active participant in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. (v) All provisions of these tax - exempt finance requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the Project. (c) A written opinion, with supporting justification from a qualified expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application requesting tax exempt mortgage financing to document that: (i) The Project will not adversely increase the vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the City that are existing or have received preliminary City approval over the metro- politan average. (ii) There is reasonable assurance that the Project will be able to comply with the federal, county and City low -to- moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. (d) The bond indenture for the Bonds shall require: (i) The Developer to periodically certify to the City and trustee, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. The frequency of certification shall be determined on a case -by- case basis. - 9 - 11/14 (ii) The trustee is to inform the City of noncompliance trends with federal low -to- moderate income requirements. (e) As a condition of approving the Project, a lump -sum fee at Bond closing or an annual fee over the life of the Bond will be required. The City re- serves the right to choose the fee option that will be the most beneficial to the City. This choice will be made when the final resolution for the Project and the Bonds is adopted. Factors to be taken into account will include, but not be limited to: (i) The size of the Bond issue. (ii) Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request. (iii) The number of requests. (iv) Federal arbitrage considerations. (f) The formula for each fee option is as follows: (i) Annual fee: (1) Full bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one - quarter of one percent of the bond issue shall be paid at bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (2) Prepayment of Bonds: The same as the full Bond maturity requirement, except if all of the outstanding Bonds are prepaid prior to final Bond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump -sum fee equal to the present value of the re- maining annual fee payments, from the date of pre- payment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (ii) Lump -sum fee: At Bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert, acceptable to the City. (g) 20% of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of 50% or less of the metropolitan median income, unless the Developer elects to provide 40% of the Project units complying with the 60% of median income requirement; (h) 75% of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have and adjusted gross income of not more than 110% of the metropolitan median income; and (i) 51% of the Project units shall be affordable to households which have adjusted gross incomes of no more than 80% of the metropolitan median income. - 10 - 11/14 Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all 2. 7:10 P.M., Variance: 2228 Maplewood Drive ( Citgo) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ron Urban, Citgo Fuel, for approval of a five foot side yard setback variance for a proposed pylon sign. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Mr. Ron Urban spoke on behalf of the request. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 11 - 187 WHEREAS, Ron Urban applied for a variance for the following- described property: S 100 ft. of Part of SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 Ely of Sth 61/1 and N of County Road B in Sec. 9, Tn. 29, Rg. 22 This property is also known as 2228 Maplewood Drive, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -272 (b.2.) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that pylon signs be setback ten feet from adjoining lots; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a five -foot setback, requiring a variance of five feet; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on October 17, 1988. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board on November 1, 1988. The Board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on November 14, 1988, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Community Design Review Board. - 11 - 11/14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The sign, at the reduced setback, will not alter the essential character of this locality. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since thereis no sign on the adjacent property in close proximity to this one. 3. Due to the approved redesign of the site to provide the required parking spaces and traffic flow around the building, the proposed sign location is the only available spot along the highway frontage that is not within a driving surface. Approval is subject to the applicant proving that a five -foot setback, or more, is being met by having the north property line verified by survey irons. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS None. H. U NFINISHEDJUSINESS 1. Code Amendment: Residential Garage Size (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) - 12 - 11/14 2. Variance on Conditional Use Permit: 834 No. McKnight Road (Hayes) a. Council tabled Items H - 1 and 2 until the fourth member of the Council arrives. 3. Truck Restriction Ordinance a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 635 AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING COMMIERCIAL VEHICLES /TRUCKS FROM CERTAIN STREETS, AVENUES, AND BOULEVARDS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following is added to the Maplewood Code, Article VIII, Section 29 -190: ARTICLE VIII. STREETS, ROADS, AVENUES, PARKWAYS, BOULEVARDS, ETC., WHERE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES ARE PROHIBITED Sec. 29- 190(a). Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this Chapter, shall, for the purposes of this Chapter, have the meanings ascribed to them herein: Commercial Vehicle means every self - propelled motor vehicle, other than a passenger vehicle or a vehicle used for the purpose of transporting passengers for hire, and shall include every truck, truck tractor or road tractor or combination of truck or road tractor and trailer or semi- trailer designed primarily for carrying commodities, other than people, whether laden or unladen. Gross Weight and Gross Vehicle Weight mean the actual unloaded weight of the vehicle, either a single unit truck or tractor - trailer combina- tion, plus the weight of the maximum load for which such vehicle is actually or fully loaded. Any commercial vehicle operated or driven in the City of Maplewood on streets other than state trunk highways or truck routes shall have stenciled in a conspicuous place on each side of the cab of the vehicle the gross weight of the vehicle or combined vehicles as herein defined. Passenger Vehicle means any motor vehicle designed and used for carrying of not more than eight (8) persons, including vehicles known as station wagons, but excluding motorcycles. - 13 - 11/14 Sec. 29- 190(b). Avenues, parkways, boulevards, streets and roads where commercial vehicles /trucks are prohibited. The following streets, avenues, boulevards, parkways or roads are designated to be roads upon which no person shall drive, propel or draw or cause to be driven, propelled or drawn, any truck or other commercial vehicle licensed by the State of Minnesota for a gross weight in excess of nine thousand (9,000) pounds except at intersecting street crossings, except for one block between any two (2) consecutive intersecting streets or avenues, and except where it is otherwise impossible to reach a destination for the purpose of making a delivery to or returning from any lot or premises, when necessary to do so upon or along any such street, avenue, parkway, boulevard or road in the City of Maplewood: Street or Avenue From To Gervais Avenue Hazelwood Street Kennard Street Sec. 29- 190(c). Government /emergency vehicles. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to emergency vehicles of the police department, fire department, division of public health, nor to any public utility vehicle where actually engaged in the performance of emergency duties necessary to be performed by said public departments or public utilities, nor to any vehicle owned by or performing work for the United States of America, the State of Minnesota, or the City of Maplewood. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take affect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. Councilmember Bastian arrived at the meeting at 7:15 P.M., I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1829 ,White Bear Avenue ( Hejny Rental) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Board Member Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board recommendation. d. Mr. Dave Hejny spoke on behalf of his request. e. Councilmember Rossbach moved to renew the condi equipment rental business at 1829 White Bear Avenue since requirements have been completed. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. - 14 - 11/14 H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ( Continued 1. Code amendment: Residential Garage Size (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Mayor Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 636 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGULATING ACCESSORY BUILDINGS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -77 is amended as follows: Sec. 36 -77. Accessory Buildings. (a) The areas of accessory buildings on a lot shall be limited to the areas in the following table: Lot area Detached Bldgs. Detached Bldgs. Attached (sq. ft.) without an with an attached garages attached garage garage under 8,000 768 420 768 8,000- 11,999 1,000 420 1,000 12,000- 15,999 1,000 480 1,000 16,000- 20,999 1,100 560 1,100 21,000 - 41,999 1,250 600 1,250 42,000+ 1,250 (garages) 1,250 1,250 1,000 (all other bldgs.) (b) A private garage shall not exceed sixteen feet in height as viewed from the street. (c) The City Council may approve an increase in height or area by conditional use permit. However, the maximum area of any one building shall not exceed the maximum area allowed for an at- tached garage in subsection (a) and the height shall not exceed the height of the house. (d) Detached garages shall not include living space. No commercial use of a garage shall occur unless authorized by the City Council. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 2. Variance or Conditional Use Permit: 834 No. McKnight Road (Hayes) - 15 - 11/14 a. Manager McGurre stated that this item is not needed since the previous ordinance was approved. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table Item H -2 indefinitely. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 2. Sewer Plan Amendment: South of Highwood Avenue (Gonyea - 4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Mr. Ron Christiansen, representing Dennis Gonyea, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. He further stated Mr. Gonyea had to pay $25,000 to help provide sewer to service the properties. d. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 11 - 188 WHEREAS, Dennis D. Gonyea initiated an amendment to the sewer element of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan to revise the sewer shed for Gonyea's Oak Heights Third Addition and the southerly portions of Gonyea's Oak Heights Fourth Addition and the Maida property at 2322 Highwood Avenue. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows: 1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 1987, to consider this plan amenment. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and pre- sent written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on June 8, 1987, and November 14, 1988. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: The requested south - flowing system would be consistent with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Ordinance, whereas, a north - flowing route would not be. This change would reduce the potential loss of trees and require less grading of protected steep slopes to provide sewer to the above described properties. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. - 16 - 11/14 3. Crestview 5th Addition a. Time Extension b. Revision of Preliminary Plat Conditions 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 2. Mayor Greavu moved to approve a one -year time Crestview Fifth Addition Dreliminary nlat. subiec the a. A signed developer's agreement shall be submitted to the City Engineer to assure construction of the following items: 1. All internal public improvements. 2. Construction of a quarter -mile of sidewalk along a collector street in this vicinity, if the revised trail /sidewalk plan calls for sidewalks along these streets (Sterling Street, Mailand Road or Londin Lane. If final plat approval is requested before the revised trail /sidewalk plan is adopted, the applicant shall submit a letter of credit or cash escrow for 150% of the City Engineer's esti- mate to construct a sidewalk along the west side of Sterling Street, between Mailand Road and Londin Lane. b. Approval of final grading and drainage plan by the City Engineer. c. The side property lines for the lots to front on Mailand Road shall be moved as necessary, to accommodate the exist- ing water and sewer services in Mailand Pond. All lots shall comply with minimum lot dimension requirements. The property lines shall be located at least as far from a side property line as the depth of the nearest service. d. The 100- foot -wide lots located west of proposed Crestview Drive may be reduced in width, provided minimum lot dimen- sion requirements are complied with. An additional lot may be added. e. The developer's agreement shall contain the erosion control procedures recommended by the Soil Conservation Service in their report of March 26, 1979, except for Condition 1. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 4. Kohlman Lake Overlook a. Time Extension b. Revise Preliminary Plat Conditions c. No Parking Designation - 17 - 11/14 1. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 2. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the request. 3. Time Extension and Revision of Preliminary Plat Conditions. Greavu ect to the October a. A binding contract, acceptable to the City, must be signed to guarantee year— around access from County Road D over the "haul road" until a permanent street is constructed. This contract must include a stipulation that snowplowing shall be accomplished with the same standards as required for City streets. A letter of credit may be required by the City to guarantee performance. The amount shall be determined by the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall secure any necessary permanent access easements. These easements shall permit access by the City of Maple— wood. (Phase I) As an alternative, a public street to County Road D must be guaranteed. b. The construction of Beam Avenue shall be guaranteed for Phase II. This guarantee must be a developer's agreement with the applicant or signing of construction contracts for a City project. Lot 28, Block Two, must be dropped from Phase 1. (Phase II) c. Outlot A shall be combined with the adjoining lot area if the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has not approved the canal. (Phase II) d. If the proposed canal must be eliminated, the lots in Block Four adjacent to the "canal" may be reduced to 15,000 square feet of area. If an additional lot can be created, it may be added at the time of final plat— ting. (Phase II) e. A recordable deed to transfer the title of Outlet B (dike and adjoining wetland) to the City shall be submitted. The applicant shall arrange for the inspec— tion of the dike by all affected local, state and federal authorities. Any deficiencies in the dike structure shall be corrected prior to final plat approval or be guaranteed by letter of credit. (Phase II) f. A drainage easement shall be shown on the lots adjacent to proposed Outlot B over property to be at or below 844.6 feet of elevation. All lots must have the minimum lot area outside of this easement. (Phase II) — 18 — 11/14 g. The southeasterly portion of Lot One, Block Three, may be designated as an outlot if the developer and the Vars reach an agreement to create a lot as shown on Page 18. At least 60 feet of frontage shall be transferred. The future lot shall comply with all City codes. (Phase II) h. Recording of a resolution to vacate the north three feet of the Beam Avenue and the right -of -way south and west of proposed Lot One, Block Three. (Phase II) i. The applicant shall construct a berm on the Var's property at 1140 Beam Avenue to screen their dwelling from Beam Avenue traffic, if there is enough room. This berming shall be as directed by the City Engineer. (Phase II) j. Final grading, utility, drainage and erosion control plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: (1) The provision of temporary on -site sttrm water ponding, as directed by the City Engineer, until the storm sewer system is operational. (Phase I and II) (2) Grading of the drainage and utility easement between proposed Lots Six and Seven, Block Four, to accommo- date maintenance trucks. (Phase II) (3) The proposed building pad locations and elevations shall be shown for each lot. All basement floors shall be at an elevation of 864.6•feet or greater. The approved building pad elevations may be varied from, provided the changes are not inconsistent with intent of the plan. (Phase II) (4) The sanitary sewer shall be located deep enough to accommodate as much of the property to the north as possible. (Phase I and II) (5) All areas graded but not developed shall be seeded to prevent erosion. (Phase I and II) (6) Construction traffic shall travel to County Road D. (Phase I and II) (7) Beam Avenue shall be 36 feet wide, with a sidewalk along west and south sides. k. Rename the portion of proposed "Beam Avenue" that is located northwest of proposed Lot 26, Block Two, to "Walter Street ". (Phase II) 1. Rename "Carey Heights Drive" lying west of proposed "Duluth Street" to "Edward Street ". (Phase I completed, Phase II pending) - 19 - 11/14 m. Rename proposed "Lydia Court" to a name acceptable to the Public Safety Director. (Phase II) - n. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement with required surety for all required public improvements, upgrading of the dike as necessary, construction of a berm on the Var's property (1140 Beam Avenue), erosion control and a tem- porary cul -de -sac at the end of Duluth Street. (Phase I completed, pending Phase II) o. The City must initiate a public improvement project to construct Carey Heights Drive or Frank Street (proposed as Duluth Street) north of the plat to County Road D. (Phase I) Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 4. No Parking Designation Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -11 -189 WHEREAS, Walter Street and Beam Avenue from County Road D to Highway 61 are designated as collector streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COUNCIL that upon the completion of construction, the west side of Walter Street shall be posted for no parking from County Road D to Beam Avenue and the south side of Beam Avenue shall also be posted for no parking. The restriction may be removed for the easterly por- tion at such time that the street is widened to at least 44 feet. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 5. Code Amendment: Abandoned or Junk Vehicles a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Mayor Greavu moved vehicles to the defini one Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 6. Demolition Resolution: 1866 Furness Street to add a. Manager McGuire Presented the Staff report. - 20 - 11/14 b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 11 - 190 WHEREAS, the City has received complaints on the burned -out house at 1866 Furness Street and the owner has failed to correct the violation for this property described as: Ex. North 50 feet of Lot 13, Block 4, of Hillcrest Gardens This property is also known as 1866 Furness Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the house is burned beyond repair and the owner has indicated she does not wish to repair it; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the structure is an eyesore and safety hazard to the residents of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described structure be declared a hazardous building under the pro- visions and definitions set forth in Section 463 of the Minnesota State Statutes and thereby order its demolition with the cost of said demolition to be assessed to the property taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 7. Demolition Resolution: 1343 Kohlman Avenue a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -11 -191 WHEREAS, the City has received complaints on a burned -out house at 1343 Kohlman Avenue, and the owner failed to respond to orders to correct the violation. The property is described as the: S 212 feet of Lots 67, 68, and 69 (Subj. to St) of Gardena Addition WHEREAS: 1. The house was severely damaged in the interior by a fire in 1977. 2. The owner has not responded to orders issued for repair or demo- lition, and resists all efforts of the City to contact him. 3. The fire debris and a large amount of burned garbage are still in the house. - 21 - 11/14 4. There has been no attempt by the owners to correct the situation. 5. The house appears not to have any working bathroom facilities. 6. The house is an eyesore and safety hazard to the residents of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described structure be declared a hazardous building under the pro- visions and definitions set forth in Section 463 of the Minnesota State Statutes and thereby order it demolished with the cost of said demolition and boarding -up costs to be assessed to the property taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 8. T.H. 61 Frontage Road at County Road C - Petition a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Paul Wolff, representing the property owners along the proposed frontage road, expressed their views. c. Mayor Greavu moved to order the feasibility study and budget up to $5,000 to cover the exnense_ Motion died for lack of a second. 9. Request to Replace: Dispatcher Position a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved approval to fill the position of dispatcher for the Police Department. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 10. Request for Replace: Part -Time Police Position a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved approval to fill the position of Part -Time Police Officer. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 11. Televising Council Meeting a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report b. Councilmember Juker moved to table this Item until Councilmember Anderson returns. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. - 22 - 11/14 12. Radon Alpha Track Detectors a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the Detectors and also aoorove a brndoat tranefar of Al Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 13. Play 21 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Marijo Greeman and Richard O'Connell spoke on behalf of their request to place blackjack tables in establishments that have an on -sale intoxi- cating liquor licenses. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to table the request and that the applica present evidence to the Citv's legal staff that nrnvan rhA�. ,., ,n t ..r ..,. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 14. Payrate for CSO /Paramedic a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to establish a pa rate of $9.00 per hour Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 15. Future Meeting Dates a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Rossbach _moved approval to adopt the following schedule of meetings: November 24th No Pre- Agenda Meeting (Thanksgiving Day) November 28th 7:00 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting (No Change) December 5th 4:30 P.M. to Approx. 8:00 P.M. - Meeting with City Manager to discuss Organizational Structure December 8th 4 :30 P.M. - Pre- Agenda Meeting 6 :30 P.M. - Meeting on Group Homes - 23 - 11/14 December 12th December 22nd December 26th January 5th January 9th 7:00 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting (No Change) 7:00 P.M. - Special Council Meeting in place of December 26th meeting (Main topic will be alternative methods of financing storm sewer.) 4:30 P.M. - Cancel Regular Council Meeting 4:30 P.M. - Pre - Agenda Meeting Approx. 5:30 P.M. - Attorney /Client meeting to discuss Footprint Lake lawsuit (Sommers) 7:00 P.M. - Regular Council Meeting Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. N.E.S.T. a. Councilmember Rossbach reported that N.E.S.T. is short of cash for January and is asking cities to pay promptly. 2. School Board a. Councilmember Rossbach stated for a matter of record that the School Board No. 622 wishes to have a joint clean -up day in April with the surrounding cities and the school board. 3. Flashing Signs a. Councilmember Juker stated there is a flashing sign at the car wash and also another flashing sign mounted on a truck advertising Maplewood Auto and Appliance. Are there permits obtained? b. Staff will investigate. 4. Neutered Animal Month a. Councilmember Bastian stated that April has been designated as Neutered Animal Month. 5. Homes by St. Paul Water Utility Plant a. Councilmember Bastian moved to have ordinance that would cover water nrnble J ves the city the Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. - 24 - 11/14 6. Amos Hayes Day a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following proclamation and moved its adoption: P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, Amos Haynes has been a resident of Maplewood for many, many years; and WHEREAS, Amos Haynes has given his services and dedication to his beliefs for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, Amos Haynes was an active participant in the establishment of Maplewood, first as a Village and then as a City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AND RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, wish to take this opportunity to honor Amos Haynes by declaring November 17, 1988, as AMOS HAYNES DAY. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. M. ADJOURNMENT 8:47 P.M. John C. Greavu /s/ John C. Greavu, Mayor Ayes - all. City Clerk - 25 - 11/14 Agenda Number E -1 Action by 'Coal AGENDA REPORT Endorses , Modified TO: City Manager Date, FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: February 22, 1989 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 264,462.95 $ 134,186.15 $ 398,649.08 PAYROLL: $ 166,269.53 $ 32,060.64 $ 198,330.17 $ 596,979.25 Checks #8741 - #8798 Dated 02 -01 -89 thru 02 -15 -89 Checks #5731 - #5855 Dated 02 -27 -89 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF:kaz VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0 17/8 9 1 02�' VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER VOUCHER/ -C+tEC.'K --V'E-'NDOR VENDOR 1 1 Ell ITEM NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT HOSC fr,.A-- -GtRM*A-lNE HCMA DED PAY 11 8742 401700 02/01/8.9 JOHNSON, RANDY HCMA DED PAY], 17.00 8743 650830 0'2:'/01/8`­­/ NICKELBYS RESTAURANT FEES FOR SERVICE 8 T 4 4 --- - - - _ 0 1 / 8'-: MET tF--WAS,"T-E--C-0N-MDL 1,:3 `A C. v A Y ABI--E- 8746 541400 0.-`.*/01/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES ---MTJT0TZV U-H LIC 1-1:.ES*-----*''------' 8747 140400 Olif/02/89 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY,DRIV LIC FEE 103.96 103.96 5 5 430.00 r 18Z ■ zo -40 105.50 105.50 120 8748 541400 022/ 0 2/3' MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 11,455.13 22 181 7 4 51 541400 OZ 10 18. 9 MINN. M-ATE -IRLA -ER S-lA7E DRil IC FE 23 Z 4 8750 080400 0 0/89 BLUE CROSS- BLUE SHIELD HEALTH LIFE DENT 6 26 A/R INS CONT 463.14 •7 ld -0500 27 6 1 81bi 32 0 e. 7 0 Z 789 GR'n- F REA N HC A DED P HEALTH LIFE DENT 7- ! .$0 A/R INS CONT 224. 00 32 8752 810100 02/02/89 SHARE HCMA DED PAY 1 HEALTH LIFE DENT 2 -A7R INS C.0 z 8 51 - Z' 9 8753 151150 0 0 e. 9 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS. CO. LIFE INS PAY 93.10 HEALTH LIFE DENT 579.24 A/R INS CONT 12.43 2.754 500600 0.2'/02/89 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE LTD INS 1 -75-5- 5414 U­ 0 Z /'0 3 8 9-'---- M-1 -N N'- STATE -TR E A S* U R ER - TO R --- V`T- H'--I-C-- F E E S _1��7 : 7_�_ wi 0 8756 541400 02/03/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 679.50 VI 8757 530550 012.`/03/89 METRO EAST DEVELOPMENT PARTNER FEES FOR SERVICE 100.00 7-15 -'j- -9-CF40 G E-P T . 0 F- N ATIJ R- A L--RE-S 0 U li E S''- K--LT-C--F EE S-P-AY-- Y4 - 5? 0 - /03/89 D E PT --PAIR '& 111AINT/B 20.00 '37 9 19 0.2 0 0 0 OF LABOR AND R L. 87 60 7' 20 0 r /03 /89 Pt. BL IC EMPLOYEE PERA DED PAY 9 PERA CON 13,001.17 87L*-*I1 510900 0 Jci6 S9 MAPLEWOOD ',:-,TATE BANK FICA PAYABILE '( FED INCO Iii I':- TAXES P -, l 1 9 75 .35 1 9 0 11 - 51 7 1 .7-4 5 79.50 100.00 4 UP . 0 0- 20.00 22,962.90 PAGE 1 AMOUNT 17.00 11,455.13 z 8 9 9 7 5 . 10 VOUCHREG CITY OF' MAPL17.WOOD PAGE 2 02/17/89 12:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER VOUCHER/ F . T-TR-- v V1 K I-U 3 C HE Cie,- N DO R CmEer, VENDOR i Tr---M --rill 4 CMECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 PICA e0NTRf2UTf0N9 yJ 8762 541400 02/06/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC PBL. 436.50 436.50 It 8764 541400 02/06/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC PBL.. 1 1 3 8765 560100 02106t89 M N 9 T A T-E---Cf-I M M- 81811 N E R STATE fNeOME TAX Rft. T rk 5 -9 7 4 5 8766 510900 02/06/89 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK. WAGE DEDUCTION 337.50 It 337.50 Is 2( 7 8T67 541440 02/07/89 MN STATE TREASURER SURTAX SURC14ARGE TAX PAY 604.40 604.40 2- 2,' 8 76 0 5 it f 400 02tOTtf59 MIL-NN. SiTATE TRIffAlStIRER MOTOR vepi tic rEES 7 5 15 2 1 ? 5 :0 . 8769 541400 02/07/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 564.50 8770 030400 02/08/89 ANDERSON, CAROLE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 15.98 2S 3( :4 SUPPLIES JANITOR 2.91 31 X TRAVEL & TRAIN TRAVEL & TRAIN 4.00 2.00 '7 TRAVEL. & TRAIN 2.00 3! 3f t TRAVEL. & TRAIN 7.15 36.44 3f 39 4C 877 1 8772 68iio() 541400 06"1 M%j I A 02/08/89 OFFfCE PRODUCTS MINN. STATE TREASURER TRAVEt & TRArN MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 9 9 . 0 0 1 7 9 . 0 0 41 42 11145.9 43 0 44 8773 541400 02/08/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 469.50 469.50 47 4F STT4 140400 ozio9i69 L"ERK 0-F DIS CT -C-OURT LIC FEES PSLI... -8- 7 . 0 0 Sf .00 M SC 19 . 8775 530500 0 1 2/09/89 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN SEWAGE TREATMENT 112 112,439.14 51 52 10 11 8776 541400 02/09/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PBL. 3 52 31321.05 54 L2 13 a(?( 541400 0 21-OW 8 9 M N-. ---S T A- TE-- T R SKS-tJ R E RIVERS tlC Put. 156.00 5f i5is.00 sn L4 15 8778 144700 02/10/89 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR LIC. FEES PBL. 126.00 126.00 6c 17 8779 Le 842120 02/10/89 STATE OF THE REGION TRAVEL TRAINING 60■00 61 60.00 62 63 64 19 8 u 04t400 n- Z 110 1 -.1 9 PtIlM -.--S T-AT E I R URER MOTOR VEN 1.10 PBE. 1,20Z.75 1 65 66 iC 8781 541400 02/10/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC PBL. 614.50 614.50 68 67 52 53 782 8 042111 02/10/89 KISHEL ROSE A/R AM[: 3 42* ■0 0 69 32.00 70 71 54 55 8. 7 8- 3 -14 00 -- -- O r Z 11 *31-8 -75--tf 90C NTV -EfS 'S I T - ---M N N E. IS-CYT-A- --- Tf� A i z 51 0 72 v 1 z -5 • . 0 73 74 56 37 '3784 500950 02/13/69 MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY TRAVEL & TRAIN 80.00 75 80.00 76 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 o2/17/89 12:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FUR I VOUCHER/ z 3 NUCFR---C H 1: C. K v E RDIOR" IIEM I rEM 4 CRECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 -878-5 --6--Yi3oo 2: 113 7-89 ORL W --TffEA I RE FEES FOR- DER MI-CE 740.00 940.00 9 8786 510100 02/13/89 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN. FEES FOR SERVICE 780.00 780.00 1 '.3707 542200 02/13/89 MINNESOTA TWINS FEES FOR SERVICE 658.00 658.00 8 7-8 0 Z 11-31 1 N N - to*-iAiE l'REASURER MOTOR VER Liu FEES 5 915 7- . 0 0 5 95 7 0 0 8789 541400 02"./13/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 513,5.0 513.50 87*90 540900 02/14/89 MINN. G.F.O.A. TRAVEL & TRAIN 9.00 2 Z TRAVEL & TRAIN 9.00 18.00 8791 541676 02/14/89 MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSN. FEES FOR SERVICE 198.40 198.40. 21 2 . 8 7'-5-, 8793 14 v 710315 Z 11 4 1 02/14./89 V I T 7 u R 10 1 Z� K rl"S. T'R A tJ FZ A N T PEDRO COMPANIES, THE FEES FOR SERVICE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 4Z0.00 Z.76 4Z0.00 Z! 31 2.76 3 31 5794 541400 02/14/89 MINN. STATE-TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 4 4.1589040 3- 3'. 34 8 7 b 541400 02 71478-9 MINN. SIAM TREASURER ST IE DRIV LIC-FEES ----4-44.00 444.UC 3*1 N 8 J796. 541400 02/15/89 MINN. STAT E TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES 6 31 61746.25 4( 8797 541400 02/15/89 MINN, STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES .634.50 41 634.50 4 Pi 7 913- 661750 OZ1107UY NUKINERN SIAIES POWER 0 1 1 L. 1 3 8 0 to R 0 3f --l' 4 UTIL 217 ROSELAWN 2.24 UTIL 220 ODAY 2.75 L Ll T 1 L -r-SK !I LMAN UTIL 1540 CO RD C E 2.75 UTIL 2255 RIPLEY 2.75 5 U I IL Z50.1' LONDIN UTIL 2-*621 L I NWOOD :3. 09 0 Z.75 S. UTIL 124. 3 BEAM 119.77 --U T 1 13 1 -'HMY--3 6 1 34. 13 U TIL 1698 PARKWAY 40.00 UTIL 1751 ARCADE 115.55 57:31 010200 02/*b-/-7/89 A.E.C. ENGINEERS olic 1830 cly RD B CONTRACT.PYM. 538. 54 1 918.20 6 6 1 5732 010575 02/27/89 ACE HARDWARE MAINT MATERIAL 18.74 6( SUPPLIES JANITOR 16.81 6i MAINT MATERIAL SUPPLIES JANI-rOR 7 16.24 65 7( 71 SUPPLIES JANITOR 6.65 72 S U t I ES -J-A-N I I OR • 13 . 9 6 73 SUPPLIES JANITOR 23.59 74 75 REPAIR & MAIN /D 224.10 76 j VOUCHREG 02/17/89 12:02 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER PAGE 4 F UK FE-K-1-MY -I-L�l VOUCHER/ ...... v k: pq I.. K VEND-OR 1 T E M eMEC-r 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT A 7 5733 021100 02/27/89 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SUPPLIES jANITOR BOOKS !3.30 420.35 1 SZP . 4 1 iC 420.35 0 1 5734 021200 02/27/89 AMERICAN FASTENER SUPPLIES VEHICLE 7 2.05 72-05 14 1! 1E 3 5735, 021425 0 2 f 2 17 KAM-E-Rt • AN-PtANNING A1,23 co" 0 e 1 A T f SbEs MEMBER 194.00 4 TRAVEL & TRAIN 340.00 534.00 is 5 6 5 7 3- 6 2 1 t, 00 v4f4T!89 AMERfeAN STORES UPPL -r3--VEHI - A�-.--z 1311 zc 4 . Z 3, 21 7 5737 021650 02/27/89 AMERICANA INN TRAVEL & TRAIN 44.54 22 44.54 Z3 9 0 5738 040900 02/27/89 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE ACCTS PAY 425.96 2E REPAIR & MAINT/V 296.55 27 2E 2 REPAIR & MA111-FIV 5r 4. T 811T.41 Z9 3c 3 5739 041610 02/27/89 A&S AUDIO VIDEO PRODUCTIONS CONTRACT PYM. 10.00 31 10.00 32 :6 5740 061900 02/27/89 BATTERY 'TIRE WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 35.02 33 34 '7 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 29.36 M 36 StrPFrt��l - VT---MCLE -T44. 1 6 37 10 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 50.00- 158.54 30 39 40 13 5742 080900 0;2 /27/$9 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS tj p p t: EQ U 1 P PIE lqT UTILITIES i 9. 74 140.00 ■ 41 42 44 UI 1: 1 TES 4 0 .510 45 5 UTILITES 17.52 -wl UTILITES 6.48 4 413 7 17 UTILITES ZS . 4 0 12.12 49 5c 19 DUE TO OTHER GOVN 41543.00 52 NER (3.kjvm 3 53 DUE TO OTHER GOVN 693-32 54 DUE TO OTHER GOVN\ 509.e-j SE l3 19 5 081400 02/21/89 BOYUM EQUIPMENT, INC. DUE 10 OTHER uuVN\ SUPPL VEHICLE 23 6 4 . :3 0 163.27 6 57 163.27 6C tF 17 5744 L13 090500 02/27/89 BRACKE LOUIS FEES FOR SERVICE 705.00 61 705.00 62 63 64 19 5 -5 09-1406 02127189 B-Rl IT-T-EC-H CORPORAl ION MAINI MAIERIAE 08 65 66 io 51 5746 101400 02/27/89 BUILDERS SQUARE MAINT., MATERIAL 41.64- 67 -41.64 68 69 57. 53 5747 101900 02/2•/89 BUSINESS RECORDS CORP, MN SUPPLIES OFFICE 50.75 50.75 70 71 54 55 5 ( 4 -8- 11 0 11 V277 7 1 ,-3,59 s - EQUIPMENT Z7.80 72 Z It" 0 73 74 5749 131100 02/27/89 CHIPPEWA SPRINGS FEES FOR SERVICE 9.90 75 9.90 76 il I VOUCHREG 02/17/89 12..' : 02 OF 3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER 4 CHECK -VENDOR fl, VtNL)r-TR I I-EM I IEM CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 -575 ---l-40300 02 1 Z 7 /819 CLEAN STEV Kt]Cj--S FE FOR SERVICE 1 9 FEES FOR SERVICE 13.35 Z5,70 10 it 12 0 075 1 14Z850- OZIZ7189 CHRISTYS COUNTRY STORE SUPPLIES jANITOR !?.00 • 00 13 14 5752 152300 02/27/89 COPY DUPLICATING PROD. DUPLICATING COSTGS 285.52 .285.52 is z 3 4 5753 161200 02/27/89 CRIME EYE, INC. EQUIPMENT OTHER& 551.00 551.00 zc 5 7 54 110400 OZ7Z-77089 CUR-1 IS. INDUSTRIES, lNu. S V VLHIULE-- --- ' 3.63 21 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 2.32- 41.31 22 23 24 --5T55 180100 Ozi TI-89 DAY-roNs BLUFF SHEEI ME'TAL SUPPEIES jANI'TOR 30. (ju 0 0 0 25 2c :o z] 5756 180800 0Z/27/89 DALCO SUPPLIES JANITOR 206.52 za SUPPl- ES jANTTOR 8.00- i98.5z 29 :3 5757 180900 02/27/89 DALEY, PAT FEES 3 FOR SERVICE 516.00 516.00 1 32 33 5758 190950 02/27/89 DEPT. OF TAXATION FEES FOR SERVICE 33-Z5 33,Z5 34 31 36 5759 270ozoo uZ747789 DISPOIE RESOL-010N CENIER FEES FOR SERVICE Z01:30.00 Z!au.uo 37 38 39 5760 230700 02/27/89 EAST SIDE G.T.C. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 27.24 40 SUPPCIES VEHICEE 3 7 . 6 5 41 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 46.00- 110,89 42 43 44 ----5!61 Z30900 OZ7Z 7 789 EASIMAN KOUAK UU. VUFL ICA I I NU CUS 1 5 9 U-.- 45 45 15 DUPLICATINg COSTS 201.00 •17 DUPLICA*rING COSTS 150.75 .18 97 L) U P L I CA T-I-WG- --C-O S I S 150.15 49 DUPLICATING COSTS 210.10 5c DUPLICATING COSTS 241.20 52 10 DUPE !CA I lNG COSTS 150.75 53 it ACCTS PAY 515.19 1 eizo ■ 19 54 55 8'9--'E'KER-G-EN-CY-- AP-P'*A-RA T U S--MA I .8Z .56 82. 56 SE 15 5763 250150 02/27/89 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY, INC. REPAIR MAINT/0 200.50 200.50 6c 61 5764 261200 02/21/89 FIRST TRUST ACCTS PAY 687 .75 62 62 ACCTS PAY 705 .49 1 1 393.24 64 65 50 5765 300500 02./27/89 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS CLOTH 19.47 67 UNIFORMS CLOTH 19.47 68 S CL14 9.74 69 ON R M IS K UT 53 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 9.73 70 71 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 19.47 - C --- -- --- 55 U N I - 73 F OR MF:-; -- --C-1 �'Tff lQ'.47 % UNIFORMS & C 74 LOTH 53.86 75 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 53.86 76 ----- -- - ------ u -F - --PE-R­l'0-U--1 - - -------------- 2 3 VOUCHER/ 4 3 ifl- iJ A L I't it- I !j VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 02/17/89 12:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER PAGE 6 I.-Ilih FtNlul) 1* VOUCHER/ WilECK VENDOR CHECK v 1TEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 UNIFORMS & CtOTH UNIFORMS & CLOTH S. 6 53.86 Ic UNIFORMS & CLOTH 53.86 T H -4 UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.42 UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.42 U N 1 P 0 R 118­ CLOTM 81 . 93 UNIFORMS CLOTH 45.42 UNIFORMS CLOTH 18. .5 U N-1 r- 0 R M - --2x- UNIFORMS & CLOTH 18.54 Z2 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 18.54 23 24 U 111 r u R 11 S & CLOTM UNIFORMS & CLOTH .04 27.90 21 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 27.90 UNIFORMS' & CLOTH UNIFORMS & CLO TH 27.17- 27.90 3C UNIFORMS & CLOTH 53.86- 31 737.70 32 5766 $02100 02/27/89 GENUINE PARTS SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 32.76 33 NT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 26.24 5 �59.00 36 5767 302400 02/27/89 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ACCTS PAY 1,064.75 19064.75 38 39 5768 302600 0 2 t927 tO 9 (3tADQjT0ftE--ttJMPT*R MART • PROtRAM 8UPPt.lE.oS3 2 • 9z 40 41 REPAIR 7 MAINT/B 68.15 42 71.07 43 44 6 1) 3 0 2 970'0- 0 1 21 1 e. GLENWOOD lNGL--E;-KZ- CONTR p Y 11 . i t z . 1 -5 45 5770 310300 02/27/89 GO ODYEAR TIRE COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT/V 47.00 47 48 REPAIR & MAT-14T!V 51 0 49 5771 310650 02/27/89 GOPHER RECYCLING CONTRACT PYM. 5 159738.88 52 5772 310850 02/27/89 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE TRAVEL & TRAIN 190.00 53 190.00 54 I.-S 330Z40 0 27' 8 9 PROGRAM REG FEES 1 56 15 0 0 5 se 5774 340050 09/27/89 HEALTH RESOURSES CONTRACT PYM. 14.33 6c COMIRACI- P Y-M 14 - -3 3 (;1 CONTRACT PYM: 14.33 62 CONTRACT PYM. 186.66 63 64 CONTRACI P'M a 7 • 6 6 65 CONTRACT PYM PYM. 93 .313 66 67 PY M - . - 14.3 3 68 CONTRA-ul PYM. CONTRACT PYM. 14.3 :*" 69 70 71 FEES .FOR SERVICE 2 8 6 -1 -2 72 e -rE Ej R SERVICE 4 IS. 73 FEES FOR SERVICE 14.33 11082.84 74 75 76 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ^ �" 1 .1 -r f i-A 1-1 .1 Vf'lll('.'HFRlC;HFCkp REGISTER PAGE 7 to FOR FERIVID 15 .VOUCHER/ 3 4 CHECK -VT- N JJ U K H r-.'C. K Ell�OR V q ITE TEM CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 --l-5775 *211-4 17 0 0 OZ!Z7189 HERST:RT*- j. iRAVEL TRAIN 48.91 48.91 9 10 5776 350700 02/Z7/89 HIRSHFIELDS SUPPLIES JANITOR 18.77 18.77 it 5777 350850 02/27/89 H.J.D. SECURITY REPAIR M A 111 T/ Do 155-400 13 155.00 14 is 5 T 7 .3 13 0 0 OZ127/89 NELL, jUDITH PROGROM SUPPLItS 1 16 17 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 2 3. 19 20 5-1 79 351400 OZ 7Z7789 HORWATH, TOM FEES FOR SERVICE ACCTS PAY 111.00 351.00 21 468.00 zz 23 5 380 -00 OZ7ZT1 a • . • S 4 MEMBERS r to 24 • 25 26 5781 400815 OZ/27/89 JANTZ TOOL CO. SMALL TOOLS 37.20 151. 75 2 7 28 29 5782 430400 02/27/89 KNOX LUMBER ��MALL MUE5 MAINT MATERIAL 44•83 • 30 31 32 5OPPLI L�5 JAN I I OR Z9.Y8 74.81 33 34 f 5783 430800 02/27/89 KOKESH ATHLETIC PROGRAM SUPPLIES `67.98 35 67.98 36 5784 440350 02/27/89 KRISS PRODUCTS, INC. MAINT MATERIAL -*S 81.02 37 3d 81.02 39 40 5 1 S 5 Z- G. UVZ7789 EAEURAIUKY UF URNIvRUL Uy p URAM l]FPLlE5 .7.7'79 -957. Y b 41 42 3 5786 450800 0'2 /27/$9 LAKELAND FORD SUPPLIES VEHICLE 43 SOPPLIES VEHICLe--- 45 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 10.38 46 43 5 SUPPLIES VEHICLE .336.1 494.66 4E 46 7 8 5787 4 02/27/89 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES SUBS & MEMBER 3 sc 3 sl 5; -7 . 4 0 _. 61zu -0 77 CESCIE PAPER S 1 F L L t b -OLFF-1c. E 5 - SUPPLIES OFFICE 147.69 5! SUPPLIES OFFICE 82.05 54 LIES M-1710E z o V SUPPLIES OFFICE 180.51 54 ,5 SUPPLIES OFFICE 82■05 64 S U P P L IrS Ll 377.43 6 16 7 SUPPLIES OFFICE 311.79 19641.00 6 ' , 6- WSP PT P UB L I S H IN 3 8 6! 61 PUBLISHING 49.63 6 PUBLISHING 7.11 61 6! 53 5790 510300 02/27/89 MAPLEWOOD SCREENPRINT UNIFORMS CLOTH 32.50 71 7' UNIFORMS CLOTH 32.50 65.00 TA 7: 56 5791 511330 57 0 2 / 2 7' / ED. 9 INEZ, GALE MART Y PROGRAM REG FEES 9.50 74 9.50 7! 76 to 02 3 4 6 5 6 7 �`2 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 8 02/17/89 12:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER io z VOUCHER/ 4 L; FtE C. K NUMBER VENDOR NUMBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NAME I T E lyl DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CRECK 5 AMOUNT ri 7 5T92 5793 mlii600 520500 0Z/ZTl89 02/27/89 MASYS CORP MCGUIRE MICHAEL REPATR MAINT EQUIP. VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 1 350.00 350.00 5794 521150 02/27/89 MEMOREX TELEX TELEPHONE 545.79 545.79 14 is 5 711? 13 5 30 i 50 OZ127t89 MERIT CHEV-RtItET S PPLIES VE 6. !:3 S ■ t 17 5796 540550 02/27/89 MIDWEST ANIMAL SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 1 1 5797 540720 02/217/89 MINN COMM OUTSIDE RENTAL EQUIP. 141.00 21 � 141.00 z 2 3 2.4 579-0 5T99 --54t#55 541925 02 12 7 t 0 02/ZT/99 MINNESOTA MAYORS A15350elATION 'MINNESOTA CELLULAR MEMBERSNIP EQUIPMENT OTHER 10.00 11878.00 .!0.00 25 26 2 7 28 E ri,,, d f r m E N T 0 T H Effit 135.00 29 30 5800 580320 02/27/89 M-R SIGN COMPANY SIGNS & SIGNALS 970.02 970.02 31 32 5801 610750 02/27/89 MUNICIPAL WORKER LAW BULLETIN SUBS & MEMBER 46.89 3.1 46.89 34 35 36 V4 1271-89 NATIONAt CKI E V E N I- PROGRAM- ISUPPLTES 15 0 37 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3.00 33.50 39 5 88 0:3 630800 O2l2Tt89 NCR REPATR & MITINTlE REPAIR & MAINT/E is.50 16.50 42 REPAIR & MA*IN*r/E 16.50 43 44 REPA I R & MAIN11E 175. ti t.) 45 REPAIR & MAINT/E 16.50 46 REPAIR & MAINT/E 16.50 47 48 REPALR & M A 11WT 1 t .5 v 49 REPAIR & MAINT/E 16.50 132.00 50 51 504 0- 6408t2 ftftT�09 14-8 0 t NH HA-1 AM OVERPAY 2 5Z 53 Z . 0 0 54 5805 660800 02/27/89 NORTH ST. PAUL. CITY OF UTILITES 66.00 55 56 LJ TI L 1 T E 13 57 5806 680600 02/2T/89 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR & MAINT/V 6. 13 59 610 P A 1 R & MAINT/V 0 . 6 61 REPAIR & MAINT/V 171 .64 62 63 REPAIR & MAINT/V 30.65 64 KtpAiK .x mA mr iv 6 65 REPAIR MAINT/V 6 .13 66 67 REPAIR 82c MAINT/V 6.13 6 fl MA 11 1- 1V 2 . .L 6 2 3 REPAIR MAINT/V 6.13 7p 465.88 71 72 ---- --- - 5 07 691400 --02 i 2 7 8: /A-9 fiR AISIF e ■ A C.' C. -T S PAY .5 . 7 5 . 73 9 -1.8, 7 5 74 6 7 5808 691600 02/27/89 CASTER ANDRE-A TRAVEL & TRAIN 13.17 75 13.17 76 io VOUCH REG CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD PAGE 9 02/17/89 12:02 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER - - ----- ---------- - - -------- - --- - - --------- 2 VOUCHER/ 4 CHECK VENDOR— CHECK V D O-R I I Em IIEM CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 08.09 7 1 Z 100-- Z 1 Z T /P 8 9 PITNEY -r-,-awlES E17LrT r M it. 1\11 I r ull R C H A IS E u E- 14,Z56.00 9 5810 7Z1110 02/27/89 PRO LOK SUPPLIES VEHICLE 635.76 635.76 0 1 5811 741300 02/27/89 RAMSEY CLINIC CONTRACT PYM. 46.00 13 .46.00 14 11 3 12 741560--­ 0Z/-ZT-/-cwr9­­RA-M-'o*EY CuLJNTY-- CUNTRACI- PYM zyi.00 le 11 4 CONTRACT PYM. 291.00 582.00 IE is 58 13 T4z!!G- 02:7ZT189 RAMSEY EPIERG. MEDICAL SERVICES IKAVLE- TRAI ING 180.00 zc 21 u SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 25.75 205.75 22 23 24 o 5814 T4Z900 OZIZT!av RAY DAVIS .3; SONS SUPPE tiJ EQUIPMENI SUPPLIES JANITOR 13 . z 0 15.90 Z! ZE SUPPLIES JANITOR 29.80 58.90 V 2E A 5815 743100 02/27/89 RAZSKAZOFF DALE TRAVEL & TRAINING 31.08 29 31.08 31 32 581 150500 0 L Tl;3 REEF 1NDUSIRIES MAI*N_l_ MAI-ERIAL T;34. Z.4 134 • Z4 33 34 6 7 5817 750800 02/27/89 REM INGTON'ELECTRIC FEES FOR SERVICE 185.04.. 35 185.00 36 :a :9 5818 751350 02/27/89 RICHARDS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 5.66 37 38 io PROGRAM SUPPLIES 9 .91 39 15.57 40 iz 5819 761200 02/27/89 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 60-88 41 42 43 is REPAIR MAINT/V 22.94 55 36 5820 761600 02/27/89 RONS PRINTING - REFAIR *-:r MAINI/V 8"UPPLIES OFFICE lb4.00 207.43 45 47 207.43 48 37 5821 780300 02/27/89 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.54 49 SUPPLIES OFFICE 43.24 51 52 SUPPLIES OFFICE 18.7Z 53 1�. 51 2 = .00175 02/27/89 S.E.H. ACCTS PAY 397.13 55 56 13 ACC-rs y t.5pz ■ ot, 51 SFf 5 5823 800400 02/•7/89 SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 32.43 32.43 UQ 5 8'21 810950 042/27/89 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO REPAIR MAINT EQUIPMENT 88.00 88.00 i. r- E E cc R i U4 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 4.82 191.82 oG s 1 3 -6 0 2- TZ 7 7 V 19 SPS OFF P Ku Jjc. I S s-UPPEILEJ ul-l-luE 141.48 oe 53 SUPPLIES OFFICE 147.48 70 71 54 SUPPLIES OFFICE 43.02 72 55 - ---- - .. .... ----'rS'_UP_P L I E S­ -OF F I C. L 73 56 SUPPLIES OFFICE 74 75 57 SUPPLIES OFFICE ZZ.95 76 3 4 7 to W!] L: I' - Ili IIJ i.: -At VOUCHREG 02/17/89 12:02 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER PAGE 10 1w Ii m r tL N I Ll U I !:I VOUCHER/ VE OR I T E- -M- CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT -FICE 4 .3 r- SUPPLIES OFFICE 34.31 SUPPLIES OFFICE 79.79 1- E-ts - --flff -f t E SUPPLIES- OFFICE 91 .2-5 761.86 58 4 8 402.00 fi tl-2-7- 1 09 S T P A U t -- E-, 0K 8n e PR OO -M-- -1.j PPLIES 6 9 6 9 5828 8 40400 02/27/89 ST.PAUL CITY OF DUE TO OTHER GOVN 1 1 5829 840800 02/27/89 ST.PAUL RAMSEY MEDICAL CENTER CONTRACT PYM. 29.00 29.00 5 0-:5 0 842100 02 t w STANDAR-D-SPRINO & A1L--fGNMEWT- REPAIR- MAfNT VEHICLE 6 0? -5 0 5831 8 42450 02/27/89 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING MAINT MATERIAL .141.36 141.36 5832 843500 02/27/89 STREICHERS GUNS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 92.50 ':?2.50 - TRAVE TRAfNIN6 5.00 5:8133 8503tt Otft 9 SUBUR N COMMUNITY CHANNEtS 5.00 5834 8601-00 02/27/89 T. J. AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES VE HICLE 4.8.46 - - ----- I - - HICLE ro'LIPPL -E'13-� SUPPL.11-'--'S VEHICLE 33.28 SUPPLIE=S VEHICLE 98.48 IVIAItIT 'lv!ATE-.FZTAr- P3 . gs 46, 1 .5 4 5835 860150 02/27/89 T.K.D.A. CONTRACT PYM. 3.9.53 -R -CT PYM. C n-111' A - 1 0- 39 . CONTRACT PYM. 1 CONTRACT PYM. 4 A C C; T-0----P A Y 5836 860700 02/27/89 TAUBMAN DOUGLAS VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 19.94 19.94 5838 860800 02/27/89 TEAM LAB CHEMICAL SUPPLIES JANITOR S7` .92 378.92 0.2., 1 2 T-fe--9-- ----T-H-AffF- - HAWK 11 4-S'L-P 0 LAFr-C+tEV v .40 REPAIR &- MAIN- r/v 20.40 VEHI. CL_ E PURCHASED 41 41,704.80 5839 8T1200 02/2T/89 TOLL COMPANY MAINT MATERIAL 127.73 127.73 55 15 5 8 4 0 t ZZ 0 0214718-9 1 0 M--"' 236 M 0 E., 1 t E --S-E V T C E H E PA H :T. MA I N 1 7 V 45. 65 4 . 6 5841 880800 02/27/89 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG. REPAIR & MAINT/V 3.56 3.56 3 5842 882050 02/27/89 TWIN CITY MAP CO. c-*)*LJPPI-IES OFFICE 11.66 SUPPLIES OFFICE 23.32 34.98 5843 900100 02/27/89 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTH •6.92 UNIFORMS & CLf-**ITH 25.20 1w VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 11 n*7* 1 17 lPq 1 :7!! VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FUR PERIOD 15 z VOUCHER/ 3 4 L; ti to co K VENDOR CHECK VENDOR CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 7 UNIFORMS & CLOIR UNIFORMS & CLOTH r 101,60 9 10 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 195.10 369-DBZ 11 5844 900150 02/27/89 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES SUPPLIES OFFICE 173.47 13 173.47- 14 15 5 8- tit 900170 OZ1411817— UNITED EL CTRIC COMP-ANY ACCIS PAY a 16 it r r ts 17 5846 901100 02/27/89 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 65.60 19 65.60 20 5847 910500 02/27/89 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL FEES FOR SERVICE 199.00 21 22 FEES FOR SERVICE 142.00 341.00 23 24 5848 940500 02/27/89 WEBER—TROSETH INC. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 14.00 25 1.4.0 1. 0 26 27 28 0 8 49, 5850 940TOO 942800 0 z /0 10, --14 02/27/89 E S 0 WINFIELD MITCHELL. SUPPtTES jANlTuR LEGAL FISCAL 1 Z!5 . 0:3 127.00 r 30 31 1 32 5851 960500 02/27/89 XEROX CORPORATION CONTRACI PYM. SUPPLIES OF-F ICE z . 6Z. 5.5 34 35 $2.55 5852 960600 02/Z7/89 XEROX CORP. DUP COSTS 5.24 37 38 39 DUP COSTS - 1 8.74 40 UP C 0 ;63 5 'a . 6 u 41 DUP COSTS 40.52 DUP COSTS 25.68 43 44 Dtjp COS I S 50.5Z 156. 38 45 46 5853 960700 02/27/89 YOCUM OIL CO. INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES 5 47 5 48 49 5854 9804-00 02/27/89 KATHRYN A. lZ'AWACKI PROGRAM SUPPL-LES 49.33 50 51 52 8 0 8 0 0 OZ7ZT!89 7TEGLER SUPPLIES VEHICCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 6 1 131.94 53 300.10 54 55 56 TOTAL CHECKS 57 3989649-08 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 1 7 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 02/10/89 CHECK #7296 - CHECK #7457 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY GREAVU, JOHN 477.58 ROSSBACH, GEORGE 399.42 BASTIAN, GARY 399.42 JUKER, FRANCES 399.42 ANDERSON, NORMAN 399.42 SLAVIK, THOMAS J. 1 McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 2 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 1 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 1 BERM, LOIS N. 1 JAHN, DAVID J. 811.88 SWANSON, LYLE 1 CUDE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902.28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 2,033.30 TAYLOR, LINDA 1 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 1 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 1,083.88 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 1 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 182.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 1,878.90 SELVOG, BETTY D. 274.75 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 1 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 647.66 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 1,079.51 HENSLEY, PATRICIA A. 801.83 CARLE, JEANETTE E. 879.30 OLSON, SANDRA 347.17 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 2 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 1 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 1 NELSON, ROBERT D. 1 FULLER, ELAINE 366.34 OMATH, JOY E. 1,079.51 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 1,112.26 ZAPPA, JOSEPH A. 1,561.48 STILL, VERNON T. 1,378.28 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 1,507.44 FRASER, JOHN 748.60 NELSON, CAROL M. 1 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 1,355.20 STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 1 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 1,561.48 BANICK, JOHN J. 1 BOHL, JOHN C. 1 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 1,800.50 CLAUSON, DALE K. 1,403.88 MOESCHTER, RICHARD M. 1 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 1 YOUNGREN, JOHN 1 PELTIER, WILLIAM F. 1 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. 1,347.46 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 02/10/89 CHECK #7296 - CHECK #7457 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY WELCHLIN, CABOT V. 1,327.08 LANG, RICHARD J. 1,403.88 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE 1,454.28 HERBERT, MICHAEL. J. 1,555.00 DREGER, RICHARD C. 1 STAFNE, GREGORY L. 1 BECKER, RONALD D. 1,454.28 HALWEG, KEVIN R. 1,696.28 STOCKTON, DERRELL T. 1,429.10 PAULOS, J R., PAUL G. 1,396.69 BOWMAN, RICK A. 1,473.78 KARIS, FLINT D. 1 HEINZ, STEPHEN J. 1 GRAF, DAVID M. 1 THOMALLA, DAVID J. 1,420.19 PALMA, STEVEN T. 1 VORWERK, ROBERT E. 1,467.08 BERGERON, JOSEPH A. 1,428.90 MEEHAN, J. 1 MELANDER, JON A. 1,467.08 ENGEN, MARIA 403.04 MURNANE, SARAH 395.17 EMBERTSON, JAMES M. 1 WILLIAMS, DUANE J. 1,354.90 RABINE, JANET L. 1 STAHNKE, JULIE A. 1 BOYER, SCOTT K. 999.88 WALDT, CYNTHIA 804.68 RYAN, MICHAEL P. 2,095.11 FEHR, JOSEPH 804.68 NELSON, KAREN A. 1 FLAUGHER, JAYME L. 1 WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. 491.09 HAIDER, KENNETH G. 2 CHLEBECK, JUDY M. 1 MEYER, GERALD W. 1 KANE, MICHAEL R. 1 NAGEL, BRYAN 890.63 LUTZ, DAVID P. 1 KLAUSING, HENRY F. 1 SCHMOOCK, JOHN 1 HELEY, RONALD J. 1 OSWALD, ERICK D. 1 FREBERG, RONALD L. 1 CASS, WILLIAM C. 1,704.68 LINDBLOM, RANDY 887.08 ELIAS, JAMES G. 1,334.28 PECK, DENNIS L. 1 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 1 IRISH, BRUCE A. 1 GESSELE, JAMES T. 1 GEISSLER, WALTER M. 1,310.28 METZ, TERRY 887.08 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 02/10/89 CHECK #7296 - CHECK #7457 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY LOFGREN, JOHN R. 1 ODEGARD, ROBERT D. 1,878.90 BRENNER, LOIS J. 1 KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. 486.34 STAPLES, PAULINE 1,642.28 JONES, LUTHER 72.00 TRAVERS, DANIEL L. 108.00 ANDERSON, ROBERT S. 1,100.68 LINDORFF, DENNIS P. 1,143.84 GARRY, WILLIAM 818.28 HELEY, ROLAND B. 1 MARUSKA, MARK A. 1 BURKE, MYLES R. 1 STARK, R. 99.00 WICKLEM, B. 156.00 VAN WYK, K. 10.00 HANNEGAN, A. 60.00 KOEGEL, R. 91.13 MCGIVERN, .J. 75.00 JOHANEK, T. 55.25 BURKHART, D. 70.00 PODPESKAR, K. 98.50 VAN WYK, K. 40.00 OLSON, C. 122.00 NARUSIEWICZ, M. 64.00 ANDERSON, C. 66.25 BESETH, JR., R. 158.75 KING, S. 150.50 NELSON, J. 66.25 FISCHER, P. 40.00 MARIANA, B. 64.00 FIRM, R. 62.50 WARD, ROY G. 406.40 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. 1 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. 1 NELSON, JEAN 366.34 HORSNELL, JUDITH A. 567.94 HUTCHINSON, ANN E. 570.44 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN M. 1 BARTA, MARIE L. 941.32 OLSON, GEOFFREY W. 1,878.90 MISKELL, NANCY 328.59 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. 415.38 GENEROUS; ROBERT 333.20 EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 1,399.60 OSTROM, MARJORIE 1 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 1,187.88 WENGER, ROBERT J. 1 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 1 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 1 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. 1,536.68 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 1,169.99 EDSON, DAVID B. 11185.07 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 02/10/89 CHECK #7296 - CHECK #7457 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY GERMAIN, DAVE 1 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 1,300.68 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 1,053.48 $166,269..53 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION CITY & COUNTY EMP*CR UNION AFSCME 2725 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION Z1 $ 7 Cl 23,409.00 Ul 457.47 160.00 U3 18.00 Z2 238.00 I1 525.41 $ 32,060.64 GRAND TOTAL $198,330.17 F —oz Action 'by Coimciin Endorsed MEMORANDUM Modif ied. wom Re Dat TO: Cit Manager FROM: Thomas Elf strand--Associate Planner SUBJECT T -i me . Extension--Preliminary Plat APPLICANT/OWNER: Donald Nelson PROJECT: G er- 0 v e r I ooh.. DATE: February 16, 1969 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION .1 Approve a one- time e,,.,,,tension for the Gervais Overlook preliminary plate BAC:VC.GROUND t This plat vj z-,c - - rir-i 9 i.nall y approved on Februar 13, 1984, and has since' received four time extensions. The most recent renewal was on February 8, 1988. subject to the original conditionso i ' r1% P , Condition oil­ s the Cit of Little 'Canada ordering water to the s. i. te IN A y ear, ago the app I i cant was re i ng that th i s pl at be detached from Maplewood and annexed b the Cit of Little Canada in hopes of red LICing the cash connection charge for water service. The arl icant has since dropped this re DISCUSSION The applicant hzits Submitted plans for the water main construction along Arcade. Street. to the Cit of Little Canada. Joe Chl Little . C., U cA Cit -y, Clerk, has stated that the are still waiting for the applicant's financial plan for utilit constrUCtion and for the plan for water main construction within the plat prior to doing their reviews RECOMMENDATION Approve a one- time extension for Block- One and Lots One through Eleven, Block. Two of the Gervais Overlook preliminary pl at. Approval is recommended on the basis that the developer is, makin a g ood-faith effort to c with the-conditions for approvals REFERENCE Past Actions 2-13-84: Council preliminary plat, 2-12-85: Council preliminary plat. 9-23-85: Council plat -for the five development. All has begun& approved the 20-lot single-dwelling subject to nine conditions. ' approved a one-year time extension yor this conditionally approved the Frattalone final westerly lots (Twelve through Sixteen) of the d construction conditions have been satisfied an 2-10-B6 2-9-87 and 2-8-88: Council approved one-year time extensions for the part of the Gervais Overlook preliminary plat not included in the Frattalone Addition (Block One and Lots One through El ewen, Block Two), Section 30-5 (e) states "For one year +ol I owing ___ iminar-v the SUbdivider and the Cit agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or o++iL--ial control shall appl to or affect the USe- development densit lot size lot la or d edication or platting re or permitted b the approYed a pplications Therea+ter P LIrsuant to its rewlations the pi ma extend the i2 eriod by agreement with the subdivider and SUbj to all MR%.' applicable per+ormance conditions and re it ip icatior unless Substantial ph activit and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a conse of a re to Submit a new applications W all (TI L) .Attachments: 1, Location 2. Preliminary Plat 3 Applicant's request -for ti�� extension da±e� Jan. 25, 1989 � - a . 1 - • o W I :.. o law t. � Gtrrolt � _ r o 23 s Q ----_ a J V / W �' a J � u I J 22 }� 1 l S.: t ' •♦ ... :.... Keller - a v If I A ° Lout suptxt V. t a w t E AV ; 9tLrowT 56 � fKILLYAN • I! L I. o I s 1 i TT = A -- E • : !�& cn v KOHL AN In a0AD � � W 0 .- on t s • :A1 36 DR SN[ A R E ►E AYE .• LAIM 5 ~ �'J R I LAURIE _j IL E A [�.] 25 a, O AVM T I N AVE . u RRE AVE > � �r F' ELOAIpO ion W AEL1rON C _ VE [ S KILL YA • .� F1 I. R � •- , •';'_• 1 all LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 11 Il • • 0 r. 4MMENNOW .. •• - e . 3 2 1� -naw 0 6 O K Is's � _„mss -. 6 s • 3::�.: .:; :. �p . I(V 1 10 . 1 1 yy. ♦ , • :: 1 00 N X �:. kept- ot .•, 7. PR PLAT' FOR 20 LOTS PRELIM • . • • ����` �•� -Fi 1 atted as the Frattelone : :• P • Addition on .23-85 9 4 .. Attachment 2 N ,A X LD �� C. • 1t1 2 6 Iw a 0'. ) LAW OFFICES JOHN E. DAUBNEY ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 700 LANDMARK TOWERS 345 ST. PETER STREET ST. PAU L, MINNESOTA 55102 (612) 224 -4345 JOHN E. DAUBNEY JANET C. FESLER ftAL50 ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN January 25, 1989 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Gervais Overlook Preliminary Plat Fee Owner Donald G. Nelson Our File No: 9427 Dear Mr. Olson: In response to your letter of January 10, 1989, Mr. Nelson does request a second extension for approval of the preliminary plat. is working hard with t As you know, Mr. Nelson g he City of Little 'ttle Canada for the a concerning the purchase of water from Little Canad g Gervais Overlook Development. Mr Nelson is steadily gathering the City of Little Canada, specifically an information required by y Road to the proposed • ' n In from LaBore P engineering for the water ma p ' engineering lan has been completed, and Beam Avenue. Once this P n is confident submitted to Little Canada for its review, Mr. Nelson arrangement can be reached concerning water service to the Gervais Overlook Development. • deliverance of water to the Without confirmation of a satisfactory Development, Mr. Nelson cannot secure final plat approval f rom the • ewood * I thank you for your professional courtesies City of Mapl • if you have any further questions or need in this regard, and Y additional documentation, do not hesitate to ask me for same. Very truly yours., .THE JOHN E. DAUBNEY LAW OFFICE C I Jan t C. es er Atto Heys for Donald G. Nelson JCF: kd CC: Client 5 Attachment 3 Agenda Number Action by Council - tv AGENDA REPORT Endorse odif i e Rej ecte Date TO: Ci Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: ORDINANCE PROVIDING WORKERS COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS (2ND READING) DATE: February 14, 1989 The City Council has indicated that they prefer to continue their workers compensation coverage rather than electing coverage by an accident insurance policy. On February 1, 1973, a resolution was adopted which indicated that the Council elected to have workers compensation coverage. Adoption of the attached ordinance will provide a record that will be easier to keep track of permanently. DFF:kaz Attachment ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING WORKERS COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS OF THE CITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2 -27 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances is to read as follows: 2 -27. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 176.011, Subdivision 9, Clause 5, the elected officials of the City are hereby included in the coverage of the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1989. Mayor Attest: .City Clerk Ayes - Nays - Agenda Number Z_ � � AGENDA REPORT T0: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF AMBULANCE BILL DATE: February 17, 1989 Action by Council g, End.orserl-� Mod.ifi*e ReJecte An application for cancellation of paramedic ambulance service charges has been received for Mikyung Choi. On September 12, 1988, this individual was transported to St. John's Hospital and on October 1, 1988 she was transported to St. Joseph's Hospital. In both cases she was suffering from abdominal pains, was mentally ill and had terminal cancer. Her husband has requested that the bills be cancelled due to her death and because he told the paramedics not to respond due to her mental illness. The Public Safety Director has stated that on September 12th the paramedics were legally required to transport her because she was bleeding. Therefore, this charge should not be cancelled. Also, the Public Safety Director has recommended that .the October 1st charge be cancelled because the paramedics should not have transported her based upon her.symptoms on --that day. DFF:kaz b • _ o y APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE C1iARGES NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: CITY STATE z I PATIENT'S NAME: ri ' DATE OF SERVICE: D t r rr TO rAL CHARGES.: J REASON FOR REQUEST: I. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): 2. Other a nco-o S�a e4v� 4L �j Jam o • have supplied rs this app1 i cati on i s I certify that the income information I true and accurate. Signed: o A AL � Date: Agenda Number AGENDA REPORT TO F ROM : RE: DATE: City Manager Finance Director BUDGET TRANSFER FOR N.E.S.T. COSTS February 17, 1989 Action by Council... Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date Maplewood's 1989 allocation of N.E.S.T. costs exceed the budgeted amount by $3,550. The Regional Transit Board finances the largest portion of N.E.S.T. costs and the balance is financed by fare box revenue and the three cities serviced. Attached is additional information. If the City Council wants to continue participation in N.E.S.T., budget transfer from the General Fund Contingency account in the amount of $3,550 should be approved. DFF : kaz Attachment r NORTHEAST SUBURBAN TRANSIT (NEST) BUDGET FOR C.Y. . 1989 Total operating Expenses $159 Less State (RTB) portion (60 %) - 95 e Cities' portion (40 %) $ 63,740 Farebox revenue is estimated at $23,000 for C.Y. 1989 and is included in the cities' portion. Cities' portion $ 63,740 Less farebox revenue - 23,000 Remaining funding $ 40 On a per capita basis and using the latest Metro Council population estimates, the following represents each city's share: '. "Twelve -month city Population Percentage Contribution for 1989 Maplewood 29,305 51% $20,777.40 North St. Paul 12,350 21% 8 Oakdale 16,026 28% 11, 407.20 57,681 100% $40,740.00 The cities are billed on a semi - annual basis, in February and July. The above 1989 contributions are 12 -month totals. * Cities' contributions are based upon projected farebox revenue of $23,000 in C.Y. 1989. Adjustment to the cities' contributions may have to be made in the second billing (July 1989) if actual farebox revenue differs substantially from projected farebox revenue. REVISED 2/15/89 AGENDA REPORT . AGENDA ITEM ' Action by, CounciIv Endmrsed-~�~�~�~�� Modlfied~�-~---�- 3 TO" City Manager ' ' Reje Date n=-*4t*4-"w/L ^.^Uy M//y^//eter SUBJECT: Grading and Water Main on Sterling Street, Project 87-45--Acceptance of Project DATE: February 21, 1989 ` The subject project is complete~ Attached is a letter from the project engineer and copy of final application for payment. Due to quantity changes of unit price work, the final cost is $7 less than the contract amount. It is recommended that the attached resolution that accepts the project and authorizes release of retainage be adopted. BAI jw Attachments ' RESOLUTION ACCEPTANC of PROJECT 7 WF IEREAS , the city manager for the City of Maplewood has determined that grading and water~ main to el everted storage tar on St er� l , i n*g Street, City Pr o j e c t 87-45 i c omplet e a nd recommend acceptance of the proj ect NOW, - r.HEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPL...EWOOD , MINNESOTA, that City Pro ject 87- -45 is complete err c::l maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the c Release of any retai erg a or escrow i e hereby aut h or^ i z ed 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484 -0272 February 13, 1989 Mr, Bruce Irish City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr, Irish: RE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GRADING AND WATERMAIN TO ELEVATED TANK ON STERLING STREET CITY PROJECT NO, 87 -45 SEH FILE NO, 87198.01 Enclosed is the Application for Payment No. 2 and Final froili Shafer Contracting Company, Contractor for the above referenced proj ect. The. project has been reviewed with your project representative Mr.,Jim Elias and found to be acceptable. This work has been satisfactorily completed and substantial) Y complies with the pspecifications. lans and We recommend that the City accept the ro'ect and approve p � pp ove the Contractor's Final Application for Payment. Sincerely, Kenneth R. Meister KRM /cmb Enclosure SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, MINNESOTA WISCONSIN F ED APPLICATION FOR 'PAYMENT (UNIT PRICE CONTRACT) • NO* 2 & FINAL OWNER: MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA OWNER'S PROJECT NO* 87-45 ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 87198,01 LOCATION: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA' CONTRACTOR SHAFER CONTRACTING CO., INC. CONTRACT DATE ----------- 0- SHAFER - MINNESOTA 55074 CONTRACT AMOUNT $76,589.00 -------------- CONTR. FOR GRADING a WATERMAIN TO ELEVATED TANK ON STERLING STREET -------------------- Januar 30, 1989 .P END. Final: APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT DESCRIPTION CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL 0257.406 6"-DIP WATERMAIN, CL, 53 L.F. 10 7.5 21,00 157.50 0257.408 811 DIP WATERMAIN CL 512 L.' F. 40 — 38 23.00 874.00 0257.419 12" DIP WATERMAIN L.F. 570 26.00 s 14, 742.00 CL, 52 —567 0257.416 1611 DIP WATERMAIN 8 CL, 56 9.5 50oOo 475*00 0257,606 611 R.S. GATE VALVE a BOX EACH 1 1 310..00,. 310.00 D257..608 8" R.S. GATE VALVE a BOX EACH. 1 1 420.00- 420.00 ).257.613 12" B.F. VALVE & BOX EACH 3 3 900.00 $ 25700.00 )257,63.2 FITTINGS I LB * 1300 19410 3.00 s 45230.00 ' 1 OF 3 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC* 1 1 1200.00 0257 .640. FIRE HYDRANT EACH 0257.907 CONNECT TO EXISTING EACH ' 12" WATERMAIN 750.00 0257.911 CONNECT TO EXISTING EACH 2 1.6" WATERMAIN $ 900.00 0257.913 TRENCHING AIR VENT EACH 0259.601 CRUSHED ROCK SUBGRADE TON 738 BACKFILL $ 2,583-00 0259 .901 SILT FENCE L.F. 2101.511 CLEAR AND GRUB'ROADWAY •L.S. 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y, 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW C.Y. $ 18,438.00 (CV) gp6 2105.535 SALVAGE TOPSOIL (L.V..) C.Y. 2116 .501 CORE EXCAVATION C.Y. 2535 .501 PERMANENT BARRICADES L . F. 2575 .501 ROADSIDE SEEDING ACRE 2575 0502 SEED MIXTURE 5 LBS. 2575.511 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 TON 2575.519 DISC ANCHORING ACRE 2575.523 WOOD FIBER BLANKETS S.Y. 1 1 1200.00 $ 19200.00 1 1 500.00 1 0 750.00 $ 0.00 2 2 450.00 $ 900.00 20 5 12.00 $ 60.00 610 738 3.50 $ 2,583-00 1 1 4000.00 $ _ 4,000.00 13370 13 0.9 5 $ 12, 701.50 6100 _4 4.20 $ 18,438.00 750 gp6 2.50 $ 2 50 50 1.75 $ 87.50 24 _ 24 30.00 $ 720.00. 1.4 1.5 300.00 S 450.00 70 75 5.00 $ 375.00 2 .8 3 300.00 $ 900.00 1.4 1.5 250.00 $ 375.00 100 100 2.20 $ 220.00 � i / M i ,w� '-•^'' ?AGE 2 OF 3 SHORT ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON INC. mr r L l �n i l vir r rm VIL11 1 - UU11 111Utu M M I Total Contract Amount $ 76 Total Amount Earned $ 69,433.50 Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incoporated into Work $ Contract Change Order No.. Percent-Complete $ Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete $ Contract Change Order No. Percent Compl ete $ GROSS AMOUNT DUE.......•....... $ 69 LESS % RETAINAGE......... $ 0.00 . AMOUNT DUE TO DATE............. $ 69,433.50 LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS..... $ 65 AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION.... $ 3 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. The unders i gned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) a 11 previous progress payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under- • signed i ncurred in connect with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under s a i d contract, and (2) all 'nateri al and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed i n or covered by this Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and .encumb.rances . 13a ted February 6 1989 Shafer Contracting Company, Inc. Contractor 'OUNTY OF Chi. sago } SS )TATE OF Minnesota } BY \ \ '< (Name and Title') _3efore me on this 6th day of February , 19 89 persona l l PP a ea red y Georcre W. Mattson known to me, who being duly sworn, did depose ind say that he is the Secretary of the Contractor above mentioned; ( Office - ) that he executed the above Application for Payment and Affidavit on behalf of said Contractor; end that all of the s ta�tem nts�= confai nett ^�� n are true, correct and complete. �": „� x ^ ... ,. 7 'r• 3 Comm? ; : ��.� ��,.; �� 'Ry Pu - Ls ' -f; :� � �: O� �� 4y s s i o n Exp i res ,.- > • c Publ • F'u� Nly Comm .:: -w. �:�� -. �, ; � ( Notar y i 'he undersigned. has checked the Contractor's Application i cation for Pay s hown above. pp y s e. Apart of -:his Appl i cati.on is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him nder this Contract have been applied by him to discharge in full a l l - o f his obligations in onnection with the work covered by al prior Applications for Payment. n accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the mount Due. 0 G1 ate ) - ige 3 of 3 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRI CKSON, INC. i AGENDA ITEM' -� / AGENDA REPORT (Revised) Action by Council: TO: City Manager _____ FROM: City Engineer Modlf ie��,__ Rmjec��dL~�_�__~�. SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Painting--Budget Transfer Dat DATE: February 23, 1989 MN/DOT is offering to include the city in a contract for signal system painting this spring. The city is responsible for maintenance on three systems requiring painting. The locations are: T.H. 36 and English Street T.H. 61 and Beam Avenue T.H. 120 and 3M Road The estimated cost for the three signals is $6,000. It is recommended that $6,000 be transferred from the general fund contingency account to the general fund account 101-506- 4330. KGH jc r Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55109 Telephone January 19, 1989 Mr. Bill Cass City of Maplewood 1380 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Cass: SUBJECT: Painting Traffic Signals 779 -1124 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) District 9 recently completed a routine inspection of its traffic signals on State trunk highways. One conclusion of this inspection was that the traffic signal systems at the locations listed on the attached sheet are in need of painting. According to the cited agreements, the city or county indicated is responsible for painting these traffic signals. The District'is planning to let a contract in the spring of 1989 for painting those traffic signals'-for which painting is the responsibility of Mn /DOT. The District is offering to include the traffic signal systems shown on the attached list in its painting contract on a reimbursable basis if the indicated city or county so desires. The estimated cost shown on the attached sheet is $2,000.00 per intersection. Please notify the District of your desire to include these signals in its painting project or of your intent to accomplish the painting in another manner. Please also notify the District of any activities that the city has knowledge, of which could affect the decision to paint these traffic signals at the present time. Having these signals included in the contract will involve sending a letter to the District Traffic Engineer requesting the State to do the work, and, in the case of a city, attaching a certified copy of a resolution from the city council authorizing Mn /DOT to do the work and to bill the city. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, plese contact the District Signal and Lighting Operations Engineer at 779 -1124. S %ne y, R tarr District Signal and Lighting Operations Engineer Attachment: An Equal ©pportunittj Employer � . � | AGREEMENT | AGREEMENT| | TH LOCATION | WITH | No. | 36 NGLISH GT MAPLEWOOD 61159 61 BEAM AN MAPLEWOOD 60973 120 3M ROAD MAPLEWOOD 62399 ESTIMATED COGTo $6,000.00 SEND TO: MR BILL CASS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1380 E CTY RD B MAPLEWOOD 55109 770-4550 /_' S;'- MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: McKnight Road Phase III project 87-05-- Plan Approval DATEx February 23, 1989 Actio by Omoozall:, Endor Modified.. Re4eoto��~~~~�.�~� MN/DOT iig requesting a plan approval resolution for McKnight Road, Phase III (Beaver Lake to Conway). The resolution is required before opening bids on March 10, 1989. The city council passed a similar resolution for Ramsey County on July 11, 1988 (attached). ' A public hearing for this project is scheduled for March 13, 1989" It is recommended the city council adopt the attached MN/DOT resolution approving the McKnight Road Phase III plans and specifications. KGH jw Attachments • :�� INITIALS 7. McKnight Road Phase 3, Project 87 -05 - Approve Plans .� 8 a. Manager McGuire the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 7 - 111 WHEREAS Ramsey County has prepared plans for reconstruction of McKnight Road within Maplewood from Conway Avenue to 1200 feet north of Stillwater Road. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed such plans and presents said plans to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: The reliminar plans for reconstruction of McKnight Road from p Y P Conway Avenue to 1200 feet north of Stillwater Road, State Project 62 - 668 -26, City Project 87 -05, are approved. 11iis approval is in- dependent of proposed cooperative agreements.for the construction of this project. Seconded.by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. - 13 - 7/11 Minnesota. Department of Transportation District 9 3485- Hadle Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55109 Telephone 779-1178 Februar 9, 1989 Mr. Michael McGuire Maplewood Cit Mana Cit Hall 1630 East Count Road B - Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. McGuire: SUBJECT: S.P. 5230-24 (5=45) CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS ON MCKNIGHT ROAD BETWEEN CONWAY AVENUE AND 1200 FEET NORTH OF STILLWATER ROAD IN MAPLEWOOD AND ST. PAUL GRADING, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, MISC. CONSTRUCTION AND SIGNAL SYSTEMS Transmitted herewith are Construction Plans and Special Provisions, to with a recommended form of resolution, relatin to the proposed location and construction of the above referenced project within the corporate limits of y our Cit Please review these plans and special provisions for presentation to and approval b the Cit Council. This project is scheduled for lettin on March 10, 1989. Since State Statutes re Cit consent prior to openin of bids, it is re that y ou place this matter on t . he a of y our earliest Council meetin if y ou find it necessar to have a representative from our Department in attendance at the Council meetin please call our office and advise* The resolution should be executed. CERTIFIED., and returned to our office no later than March 3, 19890 Thank y ou for y our consideration. Sincerel �,vl<ermit K. McR e. P.E. District En Enclosures An E Opportunit Employer t..3 �.:.t •..I . t..r i s L-1 e!c_A 1D PI V e n Ll e q 1. M 01 L O t,.,► Q U n L y t� o a O L.1 ' Pr~oi ec t* 88- 12 - -Pub l i c. Hearing DATE.: February 21 1989 "ransm i tted her ew i th are copies of the mailing list for the S ubject proj pUb l i c hearing. A tabulation of the estimated *xs es mien t • f or each of f ec t ed parcel h as been prepared and is .attached hereto. A copy of the agenda report s ubmitted at the January, 12 1989 meet is attached for reference. It is recommended that the attached resolution orderi the project L) e adopted. BAI is I Attachments � PROJECT NO, 88-12 BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ' D/P NO, 5946 ASSE ROLL ' ' %TEM � �% � ` ' . �� ` PER -- ' RATE ' ----------' ' - � -^ SANITARY; SEW, 'SEW. MAI���'' ` ,^� *****2,500.000 FF AT ***$19. 650 EA. = SANITARY GEW. SSERICE<S)'��� 000 . EA AT ****$1000 EA. = WATEMAIN `' ' `'` . � ^ R *****2,500.000 FF ' AT ***$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) *********0 EA AT' ****$1.000 EA. = STORM SEWEH .�' ''''�� ' ' ` . ' ***879,100,000 SF' AT ****$0,075 EA. = :.STREETS. (NEW) :`'' ' ' *****2v 500.000 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ./ STREETG ( ), '� `' *********N.000 FF AT - ***$15. 0O0 EA. = TOTAL .ASSESSMENT , AGSEGGMENT SANITARY SEW. MAIN ` �*******400.00O FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) 000 EA AT ****$1.00O EAv = ' WATER MAIN 000 FF AT ***$24.81O EA. = WATER SERVICE( G) ` . , ` ` ` . 000 EA AT ****$1 . 00N EA. = STORM SEWER �� � . ` *********0.00� , SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = - `STREETS (NEW) ' ' . ' ' *******400.000 FF AT ***$36. 500 EA. = `STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ' 000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ' TOTAL, ASSESSMENT.= . ' ` . , .SANITARY ' SEW. MAIN . *********0.000 FF ' AT ***$19.650 EA. = E���ITARY GEW.'} ' 000 EA AT ****$1,000 EA. = � �� ! ,u'` ` . `� `{ � , c� � `�" .' '' / *********0. 000 � FF' AT ***$24. 810 EA. = ,;— R�8ERVICE(G) ��'�p�/�'�� 000 EA AT ****$1,000 EA. = '.-STORM SEWER '' ' � � ****10, 554. 000 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = ..STREETS 8TREETS (NEW) � 000 FF AT ***$36. 500 EA. = � ' .STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ' TOTAL ASSESSMENT ' SANITARY SEW., MAIN . ` *********0.000 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(G) *********0.000 EA AT ****$1.00N EA. = WATER MAIN ' *********0.000 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = ' WATER SERVICE(S) *********0 EA AT ****$1.00N EA. = ' STORM. SEWER �� �,.` '` ****10 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = STREETS (NEW) *********0.0�0 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = . TOTAL ASSESSMEN PAGE 1 OF 13 02-17_1989 ASSESSMENT 04-29-22-12-0013 ***s49,125.00 ********$0.00 ***$62,025.N0 00 ***$66,196.23 ***$91,250.00 ********so. 00 **$268,596.23 04-29-22-12-0014 ****$7,86 0.00 ********$0.00 ****$9,924.00 ********$0.0N 00 ***$14,600.00 00 . 384.N0 04-29-22-13-0006 vil ********$0.00 ********$0.00 00 00 00 72 04-29-22~13-0007 ********$0.W0 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ******$786.81 ********$0100 ********$0.00 �' .PROJECT ''�Q. �, ��-�� ^ BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ��P NON 5946 . ' ` ' ASSESSMENT RQLL . ITEM ' QUANTITY � PER ` RATE " SANITARY SEW~ MAIN ` , ' *********0.000 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = ' .SANITARY SEW. SGERICE (G) ' 000 EA �AT ****$1.000 EA. = WATER:MAIN �� � '� '� ' . *********0 8 000 FF AT ***$24. 810 EA. = WATER 'SERVICE (S) , �' �� �� � 000 GA AT ****$1,000 EA. = SEWER ` � '`� �' � ` ****109043.000 ' 'SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = _STORM ' STREETS (NEW) � �� ^` ' *********0. 000 FF AT ***$36. 500 .EA. = ..STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT)' - � . 000 FF AT ***$15,000 EA~ = . TOTAL ASSESSMENT ' ` , SANITARY SEW. MAIN ' � *********0 FF AT e**$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW. RICE(S) 000 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = .WATER MAIN � *********0.000 FF �AT ***$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) *********04000 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = STORM SEWER ` ****10 SF AT ****$O.O75 EA. = , STREETS (NEW) " � *********08000 FF AT ***$66,500 EA. = ( ^ STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ******* . **N 000 FF AT ***$15 000 ^ EA ^ = TOTAL ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEW. MAIN ` ' *********0 FF AT ***$19.650 EAs = ' SANITARY SEW. .SSERICE(S) 000 EA AT ****$1. OOO EA. = ' WATER MAIN *********0. N0N FF AT ***$24. 81W EA. = �` , , ' , :.WATER SERVICE (S) ' �' ''' - ' 00� � � .. . . . ~ ~. _°, �� AT ****$1 . 000 EA. = ^'. STORM SEWER �***16 373. 000 � SF AT ****$0. 075 EA. = ' �'8TREETS (NEW) `'�^ ' � `'``' ' . `w********0. 000 FT AT ***$36. 500 EA. = ' �._STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ''� � � ` ' �*********0. 000 ' FF AT ***$15s000 EA. = ASSESSMENT .. ` SANITARY SEW. MAIN ^ '` . �00 FF AT ***$19. 650 EA, = SANITARY SEW. SSER%CE(S) ,. 000 EA AT ****$1.00O EA. = WATER MAIN ' ' .000 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) 000 EA AT ****$1@00 EAs = STORM SEWER ****18 SF AT . ****$0.07'-' -- i EA. = � STREETS (NEW) **.*******O V-100 FF AT ***$3`6,500 EA, = ..STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ' *********0.000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = � 'TOTAL AGSESSMENT = PAGE ' 2 OF 13 02-17-1989 ASSESSMENT 04-29-22- 1.3 ********$0.00 ' ********$0.00 ********$0.W0 ********$0~0N NN 00 4 04-29-22-13~0009 ********$W.00 ********$0.0N ********$0.00 ********$0.0N ******$811.43 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ******$811.43 04-29-22-13-0010 ********$0.W0 ********$N.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.0N ****$1�232.89 ********$0.00 ********$0~0N ****$1,232.89 04-29-22-13-0011 QN ********$0.00 _ ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,363.235. ********$0.00 ********$0.00 NOS BEAM ' ���� ` ''�EAM AVEN&�� IMPROVEMENT (EST) PAGE 3 OF 13 ASSESSMENT 04-28-82-13-0012 � SANITARY SEW" MAIN ` ' ' *********0.000 FF ^ � `[SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) *********0.000 EA WATER MAIN . .` _ *********W.N00 FF . ` :WATER SERVICE(S)� �! '`�. !� 000 EA ` STORM SEWER � �^�`'�''��''�`` ` ' ****14 SF ' ^ STREETS (NEW) ' ^^~^^^^^^°^ 000 FF / . , STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ^' *********0.000 FF ` TOTAL ASSESSMENT ' ` SANITARY SEW. MAIN ` ' �' ` �. ' 000 FF ' SANITARY SEW. SGER%CE(S) ' *********0.000 EA WATER MAIN ' ' `� � ` 000 FF .WATER SERVICE(S) '. .` *********0.000 EA STORM SEWER 1000 SF ST ' (NEW) 000 FF STREETS1 � � �_ �*********0.000 FF ')�� 'TOTAL ASSESSMENT =' ' ' � ! . . ' ' SANITARY SEW. MAIN *********01000 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(G) *********0.000 WATER MAIN *********0 i WATER SERVICE (S) . �'~� � ' �� ' *********0. 000 ` `STORM SEWER STREETS (NEW) � 000 .' ^ _ STREETS (RECONSTRUCTY *********0.000 TOTAL,ASSESGMENT = ' 'SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE(S)". STORM SEWER , STREETS (NEW) ' STREETS ( ,..TOTAL ASGEGSMENT.= . ._ ' - ` *********0.000 000 *********0.000 *********0.000 ****13,542.N00 *********0.000 000 FF EA FF EA SF FF FF FF EA FF EA SF FF FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$3G.500 BA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.N00 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36.500 EA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36.500 EA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1~000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36~500 EA~ = AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.0N ********$0.00 ****$1 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,089.oG 04-29-22-13-0013 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 00 ****$1,039.82 ********$0.00 ********$0.N0 ****$1,039,82 04-29-22-13~0014 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.N0 00 ****$1,089.N6 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,089.06 04-29-22-13-0015 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,N19.71 ********$0~00 ********$0.00 ****$1r013.71 ' 'SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE(S)". STORM SEWER , STREETS (NEW) ' STREETS ( ,..TOTAL ASGEGSMENT.= . ._ ' - ` *********0.000 000 *********0.000 *********0.000 ****13,542.N00 *********0.000 000 FF EA FF EA SF FF FF FF EA FF EA SF FF FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$3G.500 BA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.N00 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36.500 EA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36.500 EA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1~000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36~500 EA~ = AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.0N ********$0.00 ****$1 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,089.oG 04-29-22-13-0013 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 00 ****$1,039.82 ********$0.00 ********$0.N0 ****$1,039,82 04-29-22-13~0014 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.N0 00 ****$1,089.N6 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,089.06 04-29-22-13-0015 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,N19.71 ********$0~00 ********$0.00 ****$1r013.71 AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36.500 EA. = AT ***$15.000 EA. = AT ***$19.650 EA. = AT ****$1.000 EA. = AT ***$24.810 EA. = AT ****$1~000 EA. = AT ****$0.075 EA. = AT ***$36~500 EA~ = AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.0N ********$0.00 ****$1 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,089.oG 04-29-22-13-0013 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 00 ****$1,039.82 ********$0.00 ********$0.N0 ****$1,039,82 04-29-22-13~0014 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.N0 00 ****$1,089.N6 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,089.06 04-29-22-13-0015 ********$W.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$1,N19.71 ********$0~00 ********$0.00 ****$1r013.71 D/P NIA. 5946 PROJECT NO. 88 -12 SEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ASSESSMENT ROLL y .. a ITEM QUANTITY _ SANITARY SEW. MAIN AT .. SANITARY SEW, SSER I CE ( S) EA. = WATER AT WATER. SERV ICE ( S) EA. _ STORM SEWER AT STREETS {NEW} EA. _ STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) AT TOTAL ASSESSMENT = EA. _ SANITARY SEW. MAIN AT SANITARY SEW. SSER I CE ( S) EA. _ WATER MAIN * * * * * * * * *Ow 000 WATER SERVICE( EA. _ STORM SEWER AT STREETS ( NEW) EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) EA. _ . TOTAL ASSESSMENT FF SANITARY SEW. MAIN f *********0 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) * * * * * * ** *0.000 WATER MAIN * * * * * * * * *�►. 000 WATER SERVICE( STORM SEWER ****15 - STREETS (NEW) * * * * * * ** *0.000 - STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) • *• *• * ** *0.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEW, MAIN SANITARY SEW. SSER I CE ( S ) .WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE ( S) STORM SEWER STREETS-(NEW) STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) .TOTAL ASSESSMENT =- PAGE 4 OF 13 02- 17--1989 PER RATE ASSESSMENT FF AT ***$19,650 EA. = EA AT * * * *$ i . 000 EA. _ FF' AT ***$24,810 EA. _ EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. _ SF AT * ** *$0.07 5 EA. _ FF. AT ' ** *$36.500 EA. _ FF. AT ** *$15.000 EA. = FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. = EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. = FF - AT ** *$24.810 EA. _ EA AT * * * *$1.0 +0 EAw = SF AT * ** *$0.075 EA. _ FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. _ FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. _ 04 - 13 -0016 FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1,000 EA. -_ FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. _ EA AT * * * *$1. 000 EA. _ SF AT * ** *$0.075 EA. = FF AT * * *$36.500 EA. _ FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. _ 04-2.9-22-1 * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. _ * * * * * * * **0. 000 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. _ ** * * * *• * * *0.000 FF AT ** *$2 EA. — * ** * * * ** *0.000 EA AT * EA. — * * ** 13, 1 X34.000 SF AT ****$0,075 EA. _ * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT * * *$36.500 EA. _ * * * * * * ** *04000 FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. = 04- 29 -88 -13 -0019 04- 29 -22-13 -0018 �• * .k. * * if• •h• # �i k'1. lCl iCi * * * * * *iE-*$0. 00 ********$0. 00 1 b * * * * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$0, VD0 1 L9 * * * * * ** *$0.00 * * * * * * * *$0. 00 `9 * * * * *• * * *$0. 00 ********$0. • - ��, 00 * * * * * * * *$Ol 00 * * * *$1 436. 05 * * *- * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$0, 0 0 * * * * * * * *so. 00 * * * * ** * *$0. 0 0 * * * *$1, 113" 6. 38 * * **$1, 13" 8 PAGE 5 OF 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM ' ' '' �' ' QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT __________ SANITARY SEW. MAIN. � '' '-� 000 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) *********0.oL WATER MAIN AT WATER SERVICE(S) 000 ' STORM SEWER ' .� _ � '� ****17 STREETS (NEW) ` 000 ` STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) AT TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ' ' ' ' ` SANITARY SEW" MAIN:. *********0.0W0 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) 000 WATER MAIN ' *********0 WATER SERVICE(B). ' *********O.0O0 STORM SEWER ^` ****12 STREETS (NEW) 000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ' ' ' ^ SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) 000 WATER MAIN *********0 ' WATER SERVICE( STORM SEWER � ' ' � �. /� «�/'�'. �' i � ` � ****1 L. 472. 000 STREETS (NEW) 000 ` ' STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) `` �� ' - , ..*********0 ' TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ` ` SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW~ SSERICE(S) 000 WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 STORM SEWER ****14,825.000 STREETS (NEW) *********0.000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36^500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF 'AT ***$24~810 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA~ = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36~500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF AT ***$24~810 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.O00 EA. = FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA, = FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = EA AT ****$1.0O0 EA. = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.W0 ********$0.N0 ****$1,313.23 N0 ********$0.00 04-29-22-13-0021 00 ********$0.N0 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 04-29-22-13-0022 00 ********$0.00 ' ********$0.00 ********$0.0N 4 00 ********$0.00 14 04-29-22-13-0023 00 ********$0. 00 ********$0. CIO ********$0.00 ****$1,116.32 00 ********$0.00 6.32 ' PROJECT NO.' 88-12 BEAM � IMPROVEMENT (EST) � D/P NO` 5946 ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM. QUANTITY �'. 'SANITARY-SEW. MAIN '' *********0.000 � SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) *********0.000 WATER MAIN AT WATER SERVICE(S)_ ` � 000 , . STORM SEWER ' '.'.�' �'� '�',� _ '****13,307.000 'STREETS (NEW) EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) AT TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ' BA. = ' SANITARY SEW. MAIN .' *********N.N00 SANITARY SEW, GSFRICE(S) 000 , WATER MAIN '' *********0 WATER SERVICE(S) EA. = STORM SEWER ****14 STREETS' (NEW) *********0.000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEW. MAIN ' *********01000 SANITARY SEW. SSERlCE(S) *********O.0014_1 WATER MAIN *********0.000 WATER SERVICE(S) STORM SEWER ~.��,'� ^ ****131554.000 STREETS (NEW) �` *********0.000 .� . STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********O.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PER RATE FF AT ` ***$19.650EA^ = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = BA AT ****$1.000 BA. = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = SF AT ****$0.075 = FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = BA AT ****$1.000 EA. = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = PAGE 6 OF 13 ASSESSMENT W4-29-22-13-0024 ********$O. 0N ********$0.0N ********$0.00 00 ****$1,0N2.02 ` LA0 ********$0.00 04-29-22-13-0025 L710 00 ********$0.00 0, Oct ****$1,103.90 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$11N� , .90 N4-28-22-13-0026 ********$0.00 ********$0.NN ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ****$14 W2�.62 ********$0. 00. 00 ****$1,020.62 N4-29-22-13-0027 ` SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW. BSERICE(S) WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE (S) STORM SEWER STREETS (NEW) STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = I 000 *********0.000 *********0.000 ****13 *********0.000 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = BA AT ****$1.000 EA. = SF AT ****$0~075 EA. = FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 ********$o. 00 ******$987.56 ********$0.00 ********$0.00 y • PROJECT NO. 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) I) /P NO. 0946 ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY SANITARY SEW. MAIN AT SANITARY SEW. SSER I CE ( S) * * * * * *** *0.000 WATER MAIN * ** * ** ** *0.000 WATER SERVICE (S) * ****** **0 s 000 STORM SEWER ' .. ; # ## 1, 907 00 STREETS (NEW) * * * * * * ** *0 STREETS '(RECONSTRUCT) * * # * * * ** *0 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = EA. PER RATE FF AT * * *$ 19.650 EA. = EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. = FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. = EA AT * * * *$1.00O EA. = SF AT * ** *$0.075 EA. = FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. = FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. = PAGE 7 OF 13" 02-17 -1989 ASSESSMENT ------ - - - - -- 04- 29 -22-13 - 008 * * * * * * **$0, 00 * *******$0.00 * * * * * ***$o. oL� * * * #$1, 047.2 ********$0.00 * * * * * ** *$0. ****$1 04- 89r-EE -13 -0029 SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE(S) S TORM SEWER STREETS (NEW) STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * * * * ** *0.000 * * * * * * ** *0 0001 * * * * * * ** *0,000 * * ** 14, 864.000 - * * * * * * ** *0.000 * * * # * # ## #0.000 FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. = EA AT * * * *$1.00O EA. = FF AT ** *$84. EA. = EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. SF AT * ** *$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$3j6-500 EA. FF AT ***$15,000 EA. ********$o Oki * * * * * ** *$0. 00 * * * # # * * *$0. CIO * * #, # * * * *$0. 00 * * * *$1 119. E6 * * ** ** *$0. VD0 ***.*****$0. 00 04- 29 -E` -13 -0030 SANITARY SEW. MAIN *********04000 FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW, SSER I CE ( S) * * * * * * ** *0.000 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = WATER. MALI # # * # * # #* #0.000 FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S)...- *********0,000 EA AT ****$I . 00 EA. = STORM SEWER ****17 SF' AT * * * *$O.075 EA. = STREETS ( NEW) *********0 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) * # * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ***$15m000 EA., -= TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ** * * -x * ** $Q). 14)x:7 ********$o. 00 * * * # # * #*$o. IL)ci * * * * * * * *$o. 00 * * * * * **4)0' 00 04- 89 -EE -13 -0031 'SANITARY SEW. MAIN SANITARY SEW. SSE R I CE ( S ) WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE (S) STORM SEWER STREETS (NEW) STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) TOTAL ASSESSMENT ** * * **** *0.000 *********0 ** * # * * * * ** *0,000 ****15 # # # ** * ** *0,000 * * * * *## #0.000 FF AT ***$19,650 EA. �= EA AT * * * *$l s 0 0 EA, FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. = EA AT * * * *$1, 000 EA, SF AT * * * *$0, 0 7 ; EA. FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. = FF AT ***$15m000 EA. = CIO * * * *$1 1 "10. 6 * * * * * * * *$o.00 00 PAGE 8 OF 13 04-29-22-13-0033 SANITARY *********0 FFAT***$19.650 AT ***$19650 EA, =********$0.W0 0 2-17-1989 . '-PROJECT NOW 88-12 BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ****$1"000EA"=********$0"00 D/P NOW 5946 ' ********$0.00 WATER MAIN '' � *********0.000 FF AT ***$24.810 / ` . ASSESSMENT BOi]' WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 EA AT . ITEM � ' ' .' �' �UA��I�V� �E� ~_ ****12 RATE ___-___-__ ' ASSESSMENT __________ EA. = ******$9 52.55 STREETS (NEW) *********0.000 FT AT 04-�9-22-13-0�3� �/�``- ' SANITARY SEW. MAIN. �. *****w***0.000 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = ********$0.00 . SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) 000 EA AT ****$1.00O EA. = $0.Oil WATER MAIN *********0 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) ' *********0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = STORM SEWER ' ****16 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = ****$1,210.67 STREETS (NEW) ' *********N.000 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$N.00 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ' *********0~000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$0~0W 04-29-22-13-0033 SANITARY *********0 FFAT***$19.650 AT ***$19650 EA, =********$0.W0 ********$0.00 SANITARY SEW, [SERICE(S)*********0"000 *********0 EA AT ****$1"000EA"=********$0"00 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER MAIN '' � *********0.000 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. ********$0.0N STORM GEWER ****12 SF AT ****$N.075 EA. = ******$9 52.55 STREETS (NEW) *********0.000 FT AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ` ********* FF AT ***$15.000 EA~ = ********$0.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ' 04-29-22-13-0034 SANITARY SEW, MA-IN '***e****0 *********0 FF AT ***$19650 EA.=********$0.00 ********$0.00 SANITARY SEW"��RICE(S)*********0"000 *********0 EA AT****$1"000EA"=********$0"00 ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER MAIN '�' '' '�` *********0.000 FF AT ***$24.810EA. = ********$0.N0 WATER SERVICE(G)!," 6�EA AT ****$1OOO EA.=********$0.00 ********$0.0N STORM SEWER' i' ****11,487.000 SF AT ****$0.075 BA. = ******$864.97 STREETS (NEW) ` 000 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0"000 FF AT ***$15"000 EA" = ********$Q.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ` 04-29-22-13-0035 SANITARY SEW. MAIN ` *********0 FFAT***$19.650 EA, ********$0.00 SANITARY SEW. SSER7CE(S) *********0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 _ WATER MAIN *********0 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = ********$0.00 WATER SERVICE (S) *********0.000 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.0N STORM SEWER ****11 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = ******$874.�1 STREETS (NEW) . *********0.000 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 '. STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ********$Q.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PROJECT NO. 44--12 . BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) D/P NO. 5946 PAGE 9 OF 1 02 -17- 1949 ASSESSMENT 04-29-22-13-0036 * * * * * ** *$0. 00 * ** * **: * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *so. oti * * * * * * * *$0. Oct 04- 29 -22 -13 -0037 - -- y.00 ** * * * * * *$0, 00 * * * * * * * -X.$O, 00 * * * * * *$s0 07 * * * * * ** *$0.00 o izi 04-29-22-13-00.38 * * * * * * * * -0. cz= l. ********$0.00 ** * ** * ** 00 -- * - X93 4. 0L:: * * * * * * * *$O. oo ********$0. 00 04- * * * * * * **$0. cio &) * * * * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$7. 3 * * * * * * * *$O. tc' o * * * * * ** *457. 53' ASSESSMENT ROLL a ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE SAN ITARY SEW.. MAIN * * ** * * ** *01000 F AT * * *$19. bDO EA. = SAN I TARP SEW. SSER I CE (S) * * * * ** ** *0.000 EA AT * * * *$1. 000 EA. = WATER MAIN *** * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) -- # .000 EA AT ****$1,000 EA. = STORM SEWER ****10 SF AT ** * *$0.O7 5 EA. = STREETS ( NEW) * * * ** * ** *0.000 FF AT * * *$36. 500 EA. = STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) * * * * * * ** *0..000 FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEW, MAIN ******** FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW, SSER I CE (0) * * * * ** ** *0.000 EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. = WATER MAIN * *** * * ** *0.000 FF AT * * *$24.81O EA. = WATER SERVICE (S) *********0 EA AT * * * *$1. 000 EA$ _ STORM SEWER ****10 SF AT * * * * $.0,075 EA. -� STREETS (NEW) *********0 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. _ STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) * * * ** *** *0.001 FF AT ** *$15.0 EA. _ TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEW. MAIN * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT * * *$ 19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW. SSER I CE (S) *********0 EA AT ****$1,000 EA. = WATER MAIN * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE (S) *********0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. _ STORM SEWER ****12 SF AT ," * ** *$0.075 EA. _ STREETS (NEW) * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. =- _ STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) * * * * * * ** *0,000 FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. _ TOTAL ASSESSMENT SANITARY SEW. MAIN *********0,000 FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW, SSER I CE (S) *********0 EA AT * * * *$1. 000 EA. = WATER MAIN * * * * * *** *0.000 FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. _ WATER SERVICE (S) *********0 EA AT * * * *$1. OOO EA. _ STORM SEWER t * * * * ** *1008000 SF AT * ** *$0.075 EA. _ - STREETS (NEW) * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$36.540 EA. _ _ STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$15.000 EA. TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PAGE 9 OF 1 02 -17- 1949 ASSESSMENT 04-29-22-13-0036 * * * * * ** *$0. 00 * ** * **: * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *so. oti * * * * * * * *$0. Oct 04- 29 -22 -13 -0037 - -- y.00 ** * * * * * *$0, 00 * * * * * * * -X.$O, 00 * * * * * *$s0 07 * * * * * ** *$0.00 o izi 04-29-22-13-00.38 * * * * * * * * -0. cz= l. ********$0.00 ** * ** * ** 00 -- * - X93 4. 0L:: * * * * * * * *$O. oo ********$0. 00 04- * * * * * * **$0. cio &) * * * * * * * *$0. 00 * * * * * * * *$7. 3 * * * * * * * *$O. tc' o * * * * * ** *457. 53' . . ' . PROJECT NO. 88-22 BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ] D/P NO. �9��" ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEM QUANTITY ' . _ SANITARY SEW. MAIN' AT SANITARY GEW. 'GGERICE(S) 00N WATER MAIN AT WATER SERVICE(G) ^ ' 000 STORM SEWER AT STREETS (NEW) EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ' x��un�/nu�| *********0.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT EA. = PER BATE FF AT ***$198650 EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA~ = FF AT ***$24.81O EA. = EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = FF AT ***$36~500 EAU = FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = SANITARY SEW. MAIN *********o.o FF AT ***$19.650 EA.= SANITARY SEW.SSERICE(S)*********0 *********O.0oo EA AT ****$1.000 EA.= WATER MAIN *********0 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = '.' WATER SERVICE(S) *********0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = STORM SEWER ****10 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = STREETS (NEW) *********0.000 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEW MAIN . *********0 .000 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) *********O.0oo EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = WATER.MAIN *********0.000 FF AT **o$24~810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 EA AT ****$1.00O EA. = STORM SEWER . ' ****10 SF AT ****$0.075 BA. = STREETS (NEW) *********o,000 FF AT 500 Ek, = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SANITARY SEW.MAIN *****2,940.000 FFAT***$19.6%5 EA.= SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S)*********O EA AT ****$1.000 EA.= WATER MAIN *****2 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 EA AT ****$1.O0N EA. = STORM SEWER ***496 SF AT ****$0.075 EA~ = STREETS (NEW) *****2 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *********0.000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PAGE 10 OF 13 ASSESSMENT ********$0°00 ********$0~00 ********$0.00 ********$Q.00 ********$0.00 04-29-22-13-0041 ===== 00 00 ' ********$0.00 00 04 00 ********$0.@0 ********$0.00 ********$0.0Q 00 04-29-22-13-0043 ***$37 0 � ***$72,94l.4C) ********$0.N0 386.4,j **$107,310.00 00 **$275v408.85 PROJECT NO. 88-12 BEAM AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY SANITARY SEW. MAIN ' SANITARY SEWN SSERICE(S)*********0.000 *********0,000 WATER MAIN *********0.000 WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 STORM SEWER ` *********0.000 STREETS (NEW) *********0 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ' *******420.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ********$0.00 ' SANITARY SEW. MAIN_ *********0.000 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) *********0,000 WATER MAIN *********0 WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 STORM SEWER *********0 STREETS (NEW) *********0 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ********75.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ********$0.00 SANITARY SEW. MAIN *********0 SANITARY SEW GSERICE(G) ' WATER MAIN � ' ' *********0 WATER SERVICE(S) ' *********0 STORM SEWER *********0.000 STREETS (NEW) `�^ � ' 000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ` *******105"00N TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ' ********$0.00 SANITARY SEW, MAIN *********0 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(G) *********0.000 WATER MAIN *********0 WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 STORM SEWER *********0.000 STREETS (NEW) *********0.000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *******312.000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ********$0.00 PAGE 110F 13 PER RATE ASSESSMENT __________ 04-29-22-14-00N5 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = ********$0.00 EA AT ****$1~000 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$24.81N EA. = ********$0.No EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 SF` AT ****$0.075 EA. = ********4�0.00 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ****$6,3W0.00 ****$6,300.0@ 04-29-22-14-000G FF AT ***$19.G50 EA. = ================ ********$N.0 0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.Q0 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = ********$0.0Q EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ****$1,125.00 00 04-29-22-14-0008 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = ================ ********$0.00 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.W0 FF AT ***$24~810 EA. = ********$0.0N EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00` SF AT ****$0.075 EA. .�o FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ****$1,575.00 ****$1, 575.00 04-29-22-41-0008 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. ================ .00 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = ********$Q.j EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = ********$0.�� FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ****$4,680.00 ****$4,6B0.00 PAGE 12 OF 13 _ 02 -17 -1989 - PROJECT NO. 88--12 BEAM AVENGE IMPROVEMENT (EST) DIP NO. _5946 _ 1 y ASSESSMENT ROLL. ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT ---------- 04-29-2 SANITARY SEW. MAIN * * * * ** ** *0.000 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. _ 00 SANITARY SSER I CE (S) * * * * * * * * *01 000 EA AT ** * *$1. 000 EA. = 00 WATER MAIN * * ****** *0.000 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. =****.*$0.00 WATER SERVICE (S) *********0 EA AT ****$1,000 EA. = STORM SEWER * * * * * * ** *0.00+ SF AT * ** *$0.070 EA.._ STREETS (NEW) *********0 FF AT ***$3 EA. = IL � STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) * ** **** *88.000 FF AT * * *$1 O. 000 EA. = 1, %'3' 0. Cis:► TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * *1,:0. o o 04-29-22-41-0010 SANITARY SEW. MAIN * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$19.8 0 EA. �o. oo SAN I "GARY SEW. SSER I CE (S) * * * * * * ** *0.000 EA AT ****$1,000 EA. _ * * * * * * ** :p0. 00 MATER MAIN * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF .. AT ** *$24.810 EA. _ * * *- - - * ** �.1. 00 WATER SERVICE (S) * * * * * * ** *04000 EA AT * * * *$1. OOO EA. _ * * * * * * * *$0. 00 STORM SEWER * * * * * * ** *0.000 SF AT * * * *$O.O7%cj EA. STREETS (NEW) *********0,000 FF AT * * *$35. X00 EA, 0' STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) * * * * ** *200. 000 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ""$61 0 29 L2 - 000L 1 SANITARY SEWN MAIN * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$19.650 EA. = 00 SANITARY SEW, SSERI CE (S) * * * * * *** *0.000 EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. = WATER MAIN *********0 FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. = * ***** * *$o. 00 WATER SERVICE (S) * * * * * * ** *0.000 EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA, _ * * * * * * * * -O. oo STORM SEWER *********0 SF AT ****$0,075 EA. STREETS (NEW) * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ***$36s500 EA. =- * * * * * * * *$0. 00 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) ********86 FF AT ** *$10.000 EA. = * * * *$1, 290. 00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = * * * *$1 290. 00 04- 29 -22 -42 -0002 SANITARY SEW. MAIN, * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT * * *$194 b 5 EA. 00 SANITARY SEW. SSERICE (S) * * * * * * * * *O, 00o EA AT * ** *$1.000 EA. WATER MAIN * * * * * * * * *b.000 FF AT ** *$24.810 EA. - WATER SERVICE (S) * * * * * * ** *0.000 EA AT * ** *$18000 EA. STORM SEWER * * * * * * ** *0.000 SF AT * * * *$O.075 EA. STREETS (NEW) *********0 FF AT ** *$35.000 EA. - STREETS ( RECONSTRUCT) * * * * * ** 172. 170 FF AT ** *$15.000 EA, = * ** - `, �8`. O TOTAL ASSESSMENT �8; , 5r- / �PROJECT NO. 88-12 BEAM� AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (EST) ` D/P NO. 5946 PAGE 13 OF 123 ASSESSMENT ROLL � ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT � --------- SANITARY SEW. MAIN' *********0s ^ SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) 000 WATER MAIN *********0.000 , WATER SERVICE(S) *********0.000 STORM SEWER *****o***0.000 STREETS (NEW) 000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *******150. 000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = ' 49 PARCELS ASSESSED SANITARY SEW, MAIN 840.000 ' SANITARY SEW. SSERICE(S) 000 WATER MAIN . *a***5 WATER SERVTCE(B) 000 STORM SEWER *1- 5,���.�0� STREETS (NEW) *****5,840.000 STREETS (RECONSTRUCT) *****l,608.270 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = - 04-29-22-422-00 03 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = ********$0.00 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$24.81N EA. = ********$0.N0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.N0 SF AT ****$N.075 EA. FF AT ***$36.50N EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ****$2,250.00 ****$2,25@.00 GRAND TOTALS ============ FF AT ***$19.650 [A. = **$114,756.00 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = **$144,890.40 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.0o SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = **$1409441.95 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = **$213,160.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ***$249 122.55 **$6379370.90 - 04-29-22-422-00 03 FF AT ***$19.650 EA. = ********$0.00 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$24.81N EA. = ********$0.N0 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.N0 SF AT ****$N.075 EA. FF AT ***$36.50N EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ****$2,250.00 ****$2,25@.00 GRAND TOTALS ============ FF AT ***$19.650 [A. = **$114,756.00 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.00 FF AT ***$24.810 EA. = **$144,890.40 EA AT ****$1.000 EA. = ********$0.0o SF AT ****$0.075 EA. = **$1409441.95 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. = **$213,160.00 FF AT ***$15.000 EA. = ***$249 122.55 **$6379370.90 N0-2-L' now - ^ ` FOLDER %�`'~-~�~ ~ INITIALS � ~-zr- AGENDA ITEM ' � - ` TO: , City Manager ' FROM: Assistant City Engineer ' SUBJECT: Beam Avenue from T.H. 61 to County Road D . Project 88-12--Schedule Public Hearing DATE: January 18, 1989 Introduction The Feasibility report for the subject project is transmitted separately. It is requested that the city council schedule e public hearing on February 27, 19898 Back , The feasibility study was ordered under council initiative in April 1988. The recommendation of the feasibility study is the . construction of a 44-foot wide street with appurtenances and ut i l it ies from 450 feet west of the west right-of -way line of T.H. 61, which is where the County State Aid Highway 19 designation terminates, to' County Road D under Municipal State Aid standards. The total project cost is estimated to be $1 MSA funding w i l l finance $542,130 of the cost. The balance c/f / .requ'ire.d funding of $461,820 is proposed to be f inanced through assessments against the benefiting properties. ` � . On a collector street to be designed to MSA standards the city has previously utilized an assessment rate for street ' construction of $36.50 per front foot. The continued use of this rate for street construction may be appropriate for newly created frontage on the north-south segment of proposed Beam Avenue. However, it is thought that the use of this rate for frontage on the existing paved east-west section of Beam Avenue is inappropriate. The assessment rate for existing frontage should ref l ect the fact the existing paved street provides �access , � ' although at amarginal level of service, to existing residents. The benefit to these properties is significantly less than for � parcel s of land with newly created frontage and lots. A rate of $15 per front foot for property fronting on the existing Beam .Avenue right-of-way is proposed' The street assessment would include 44-foot wide, nine-ton design bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter. On the existing east-west section of Beam Avenue 'the curb Would be a barrier type, designed as B618 with Five foot concrete drive aprons at existing driveways. Boulevard restoration of existing ' residences. would be with sod. The newly created section Would utilize E1412 mountable curb to f a c i l i t a t e new house and driveway construction Boulevard restoration would use two strips of sod for erosion control purposes and restoration of all other Project disturbed areas with seed. The feasibility study notes that. if sidewalk is desired by the city, then it should be constructed on the north and east sides of the street. Since sidewalk construct i nn is entirely e l i g i b l e for MSA funding, the choice of - whether or not to construct sidewalk does not affect the local share financing or assessments. I+ the project is ordered, then the city council should determine if a sidewalk at no cost to the city or residents is desired. MSA i nel i g i b l e costs for storm sewer, as wel 1 as the costs for water main and sanitary sewers, are proposed to be d i r e c t l y recovered through assessments. The attached figure delineates the boundaries of the storm sewer assessment area. A rate of 7.53 cents per square foot w i l l recover required l o c a l share costs. Water main and sanitary sewer are proposed to be extended on the new north - -south segment of proposed Beam Avenue. Assessment rates of $24.81 per front foot and $19.65 per front foot over the newly created frontage w i l l recover the cost of the utility extensions. Water and sanitary sewer services will be provided to each potential lot with direct cost assessment to the owner. The following table summarizes proposed financing for the recommended construction of Phase 1 and 2, i.e, from T.H. 61 to County Road El. Assmt . Local Assmt . Assmt . Cost Share Cost Units Rate Rec overt' Street $ 54 5 FF $36 s 5O/ FF .$211 , 7C (new street) 1,986 FF 15 w OO / FF 29,790 (reconstruction) Sanitary Sewer 113 5 , 800 FF 19.65/FF 11,3 Water Main 1431910* 5 , BOO FF 24.81 / FF 143 Storm Sewer 149 1,986,700 SF O e0753 /SF 149,b Total ..$461 $648 , 960 Includes.. service construction costs. Proposed assessment would be ,by actual number at direct cost. r Y Project 88--12 3 January 18, 1989 .It is to . be noted that the proposed street assessment rates generate an estimated excess of $187,140., These funds are transferred to the street construction state aid fund account . This fund provides revenue for overlays and sea 1 c oat i n g of l o c a l streets and an additional revenue source to supplement funding of local street constructions Recommendation It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution which schedules a public hearing for this project. BAI is Attachments 1 . u od .es.. y t . . ROD ( 94160. r) _ 1 .0 se 6 21 (11) ,....• SAS I _ W fee • i tt t • C a�•«wa. t • X 1 ��� o ♦ Ui i •' y �[ W 1 Cr < items OW t - 1 p { 1� in • �• _ o• 1 G ol• •c . 1 j .14t lot •y� ill L .. .. fil a „s. — ter 100002 sue' ••� � -- � -- -- - -- — SOONER Slowed • PROPOSED STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT AREA .l • IL 1 t� w &L. ' s t /•c • t • yo :..•► 1 t t • l.ob w. , wl r • • { • ,� / 4.31•c M vs ISO Aota • , t.t •t ... f •� ; ' r � r �! t t)� I I � t � � � .✓. • /�- = � tt� � t� tt� 1♦ _, Olt � ' �. • • ��r �..� —�.... — ....•— • - ---�^ - "� ft . f ' • c� • •y e !• •— l i p •• i w ���c .`t I &C - s.s� �c• '' ,' Y M le4 Ix ' ' • Pro'�ct 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE 1 - i = - C— O U N'T' Y-- - -- - ._.__ , s Rt � T ____--- ,..,-- --.S L r -'ROAD • -R'' = "— D ' •_______. • - • — r r- T.'fi 1 16 sit goo t �!o •' •... • • . tom •1� NO Deli 67A W4 J 1 . C 1 .• �trn� .t j�,6�+►a. X 1 • . • &t•c cc I ke 11 Q~ ! �i Ql t w • get I � 1 • • t • ` • t.MM ; 1 PROPOSED N i Y • �-;� NEW STREET CONSTRUCTION • 1 �•t 3 - �'' .. T RECONSTRUCTION STREET ' - •• •V T ye ,--� -• . l • • - • •- - - • 1 • ' 1 • f mil/ j 4c � - (S1 �` - - - i • t•A 7 ; • 0 r • / 4.11.r of Lp ' f • • .• . N wv • t)••Ifi1/e•e - .N ICI .y•t `-- ,...... ._- •r C • aa�.• �..legl�o• 4�t• /.• �l _ — Fief ,� • ` +• . • •• • + • '�• ' �lflt tJ• fK • �.ltl K• t .. 1114 G ^ • • x t01 ' . • �• t •� j I yC •• �1 �.. �. ••. . Project 88--42 BEAM AVENUE RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARINES WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of 44-foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, utilities, storm-sewer and appurtenances on Beam Avenue from'450 feet west of T.H. 61 to County Road D, City Project 88-12, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on'February 27, 1989, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: ` 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct a 44-foot wide bituminous stret-mt with concrete curb and gutter, utilities, storm sewer, and appurtenances on Beam Avenue from 450 feet west of T.H. 61 to County Road D, City Project 88-12 as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same to be made. 2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. MAILING LIST PUBLIC HEARING LIST PROJECT 88_12, BEAM AVENUE FEBRUARY 27, 1989 7 P.M. k J � 1 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA Ss COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD Luc ille a E. Aure 1 ius, being first duly sworn, deposed and says: rT I am a United states citizen, over 21 years of age, and the city clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. 0 n February 13. 1989, act ing on behalf of the said c ity, I - - deposited in the United States Post Office at the City of North St. Paul, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of hearing on proposed Beam Avenue Improvement 88 -12, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing list. There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th day of February 19896 /17 /� _ Notary Publ WALTER M. GEISSLER NOTARY PlSUC a MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY 4 1"01 P 1P so 10 ON IA�r aoRWNW eqir.s 3-20-W NOTICE OF HEARING OF IMPROVEMENT ^ TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey L-71 WHEREAS, theCity Council County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be made, n {� NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the city council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following r - ` time and place within the said city: ^ DATE: February 27, 1989 '- TIME. 7 p.m. ' LOCATION: City Hall Council Chambers -~ ^ 1830 East County Road B ' , Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 The general nature of the improvement is the construction of public utilities, streets and all necessary appurtenances, City Project 88-12, in the following-described areas: ~The area generally described as 400 feet west of Highway 61 ' on the east, to approximately 2,600 feet west of Highway 61 between Beam Avenue and County Road D. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED CO OF SAID IMPROVEMENT IS $1 ^ It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, -' based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard' with reference to the proposed ' improvement should be present at this hearing. This council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 MSA. Dated this 23rd day of January, 19899 ' BY ORD R OF THE CITY COUNCIL .- ' — Luc1/|e E. Aurelius, City Clerk _ City of Maplewood Minnesota '~ Publish: Maplewood Review February 15 and 22, 1989 ~ / / /� . ��=/ - K = C1 YO 1 MAPLEWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 1 r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 612-770-4550 Dear Property Owner: _ An informal public information session will be held on Wednesday. February 22. 1989, between the hours of 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. at the council chambers, city hall, 1830 East County Road B in Maplewood. Representatives from the city's engineering department w i l l be present during this open house period to explain the general purpose and nature of the proposed Project 88 -12, Beam Avenue, West and North of Highway, 61 improvement. It is hoped that we may be able to explain and answer any questions that you may have concerning your property so that you will be well informed should you attend the public hearing on February 277 1989. Department of Public Works WDNQ/S HEIGHTS co p „o„ RD ..D.. Q i o ' p N O r V _ 0 W Vf W,4R C► ��` a S T � o ST. s 4kA+ Ir a Q Q W m ,nQ LY 01 � E e� 9 W _ Y � 3 BEAM K AV si a R AV- r J + SO A, hfAAKH 11 - u an Koh /mon Lake 6 POND > / v , Q W KCkLMA -N A1r Q C.�-� K 0 H L N A N u AV x . W z o co > RD 23 o J CO RD „ W _ a T 29N,R22W J F 2 N /. "� W a 3 23 N W (!) J C �iO = ♦. cr x J E HILL RD 10 11 PALM LM C � ct W � Q E DG ` pN. P J "'`} 3 DNNOR -4 W DE MONT AV m p CT 0 A �� � o (1) CONNOR AV ¢ 0 DE MON $ u ? ► PRO" AV �a 0 0 EL E W afiCC � W Q 22 3 a SEXTANT N 0 m XTAN T AV � Q ��� 112 GERVAIS �P AV a a GER'VAIS GEC! ll , - JERVAJS AV - - - -- C? F9 u GRANWtEW AV W \\ PKWY Q Y m VIKING DR r TLE A �L �1 RR N �� , oKE h AV GENERAL HEARING AREA PROJECT 88 -12 BEAM.AVENUE N AN COL) U7Y 2O0 54P .-14 184- Akc. S I N y N L , Ld � 1 ° oSo G 1 4h►c rn 1 �= 433 • I 1 � 1 � I 09 I low 1 Lrl O 1 1 _ + I f r , •.1 Q/Q 4- 29 -22 -12 PROJECT 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE N IDS 04- 29 -22 -12 -0013 ID.' 04- 29 -22 -12 -0014 ASSMT *NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ATTALONE M06REN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT WELLMORE J T WNLEY Is, -4 NTURE 070 COUNTY ROAD 0 3 66 SPRUCE ST iT PAUL MN 551095231 LITTLE CANADA MN 55117106: e Q/Q 4- 29- 22 PROJECT 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE ID N ? 5 a, 4 .' T 3.. 1 7 ,4 T (� s • J •34- 3 h /jam .: V. 1 .2 h b , r 130 0 H L A 33.1 , '�sb , �` �►. 4 T Lai �. r. r 4' LLJ Y. N Lu _ IT i G L E ai 13 1 4 l Fk TIP =- a 10 tt ,•' 1 I 0. ,2 o f LO,O K ot 17" S 16 r p E A I Z � i� w�• Ice l } R Ll Q/Q 4- 29- 22 PROJECT 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE ID N ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0016 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0017 �- ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE WILLIAM J ROSTAL JOINT VENTURE PAMELA M Ro TA 3066 SPRUCE ST 1211 FRANK OU T ST PAUL MN 551171061 MAPLEWOOD MN 551171063 j ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0006 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0007 �- r '- ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 i -= � FRATTALONE MOGREN KUHLMAN LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE ..JOINT VENTURE JOINT VENTUR E T 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 3066 SPRUCE ST PAUL MN 551171061 ID. 04 29 -22 -13 -0008 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0009 - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KUHLMAN LAKE. FRATTALONE MOGREN KUHLMAN LAKE .JOINT VENTURE ' JOINT VEN URE 3066 SPKU E ST =' 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 55117106:1 I D. 04 29 - 22 - 13 - 0010 I D. 04 29 - 22 - 13 - 0011 ASSMT•N0. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGRE14 KUHLMAN LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT VENTURE JOINT VENTURE 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 55117106 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0012 He 04 -29 -22-13 -0013 - - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 F-RATTALONE MOGREN KUHLMAN LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE 6 FRANK M FRATTALONE jljNT - JU T 6 T 6 0 ST * PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 55117106 ID. 04 -29- 22-13 -0014 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0015 - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 59.46 FkATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT VENTURE E FRANK M FRATTALONE FRATTALONE MOGREN JOINT VENTURE E KOHLMAN LAKE FRANK M FRATTALONE 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 55117106 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0016 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0017 �- ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE WILLIAM J ROSTAL JOINT VENTURE PAMELA M Ro TA 3066 SPRUCE ST 1211 FRANK OU T ST PAUL MN 551171061 MAPLEWOOD MN 551171063 1 11 ID* 04- 29 -22 -13 -0018 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0019 ftw ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. J ` - FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT VENTURE JOINT VENTURE 3066 SPRUCE ST 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 551171061 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0020 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0021 - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT VENTURE JOINT VENTURE - 3066 SPRUCE ST 3066-SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 55.1171061 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0022 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0023 - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMA14 LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE - JOINT VENTURE JOINT VENTURE 3066 SPRUCE ST 3066 SPRUCE ST r -• ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 551171061 ID* 0 4- 29- 22 -13 -00 24 ID. 04- 29- 22 -13 -00 25 - - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT V NTUR ET JOINT VENTURE 6 FRANK M FRATTALONE - 3066 SPRUCE 3066 SPRUCE. ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 551171061 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0026 ID. 04 -29- 2 -13 -0027 9946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. DAVID C SANFT FRANK M FRATTALONE - SUSAN C SANFT 3066 SPRUCE ST -- 2925 FRANK ST ST PAUL MN 551171061L MAPLEWOOD MN 551091074 - ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0028 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0029 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 BRUCE A SHIRLEY KIRK D ACKERMAN LORRY S SHIRLEY MARY JO ACKERMAN 2941 FRANK ST 3973 WOODVIEW DRIVE MAPLEWOOD MN 551091074 VADNAIS HEIGHTS MN 55.1274113 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0030 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0031 - ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 MICHAEL L HAWKES PATRICK H 0 BRIEN JAN ICE M HAwKES NANCY L 0 BRIEN 2957 FRANK ST 2961 EDWARD ST - - MAPLEWOOD MN 551091074 MAPLEWOOD MN 551095505 ,, - ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0032 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0033 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 J FRANK • M FRATTALONE JOHN L BERTHIAUME 3066 SPRUCE ST JOANNE B VOT -- ST PAUL MN 5 117 5 1061 99 RUSTIC JL 27 S IC LACE #217 ST PAUL MN 551171366 ID 04- 29 -22 -13 -0034 AHMT.NO. I . 04;69-12-13-0035 5946 A SMT.946 -' THOMAS J MCGRAW FRANK M FRATTALONE CYNTHIA A MCGRAW 3066 SPRUCE ST -" 2987 FRANK ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 -' MAPLEWOOD MN 551091092 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0036 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0037 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT VENTURE E FRANK M FRATTALONE VENTURE E FRANK M FRATTALONE --• 3066 SPRUCE ST 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 551171061 - ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0038 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0039 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT FRATTALONE MOGREN KOHLMAN LAKE JOINT VENTURE E FRANK M FRATTALONE VENTURE E FRANK M FRATTALONE 3066 SPRUCE ST 3066 SPRUCE ST ST PAUL MN 551171061 ST PAUL MN 551171061 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0040 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0041 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 MICHAEL R CLEVELAND WOODLYNN HOMES INC BETTY J CLEVELAND 2645 WHITE BEAR AVE 2989 CAREY HEIGHTS DRIVE MAPLEWOOD MN 551091308 MAPLEWOOD MN 551095503 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0042 ID. 04- 29 -22 -13 -0043 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 WOODLYN HOMES INC FRANK FRATTALONE E GERALD MOGREN 2645 WHITE BEAR AVE 3066 SPRUCE ST MAPLEWOOD MN 551091308 ST PAUL MN 551171061 r zbc. o 2 q7, � �� �► a �. ., � _- - - -- -- .�. � �.� • ac-. • 3 R. 63 O m m -T Sc Qt •� G� O ■ BEAM 00) 0 16N 4 1.7 4 br lk ff rA r r Q/Q 4---29-22--14 PROJECT 88-12 BEAM AVENUE 10 o A. r zbc. o 2 q7, � �� �► a �. ., � _- - - -- -- .�. � �.� • ac-. • 3 R. 63 O m m -T Sc Qt •� G� O ■ BEAM 00) 0 16N 4 1.7 4 br lk ff rA r r Q/Q 4---29-22--14 PROJECT 88-12 BEAM AVENUE 10 f L _J 1 F - = t I0. 04- 29 -22 -14 -0005 ASSMT.NO. 5946 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK 2866 WHITE BEAR AVE ST PAUL MN 551091301 ID. 04- 29 -22 -14 -0006 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ROBERT M WOJCIK E LISA R ORTT NIKOLA POPOV 1193 BEAM AVE 1185 BEAM AVE P 00 ST PAUL MN 551091006 Ma lEw D ID. 04- 29 -22 -14 -0008 ASSMT.NO. 5946 MN 551091006 r F - 2 ,L .52.4 5 cwt , r Doc.l;�830DO t� �•. r AVM _ Y �.,,,5 *ff AM - - - -- - - • 1 ri .41 o 31 z 60) Or i ! , r J � Ilk ' ,-- I c - ��- c , c t r r 44j r, CJ s= Tot A ri c, J: ►c. I �n N AZ ZONAL E�ATX V- R Eta (3 ADC S Inr»., 05740 i 4 4j ' 4 . i �1 a c. E� c • O -gy t ('� c.• r 1 n r �. L CD 0/0 4- 29 -22 -41 PROJECT 88 -12 0 BEAM AVENUE r+ ID. 04- 29 -22 -41 -0008 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ARTHUR S ROSEMARY A MAHNKE ii'FABI [AgIA4E 551091055 ID• 04- 29 -22 -41 -0009 ID. 04- 29 -22 -41 -0010 ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 PAUL A BAUGHMAN E PATRICK H C ALICE A KEENE CATHERINE A CHARAIS 1190 BEAM AVE 551091005 1200 BEAM AVE ST PAUL MN MAPLEWOOD MN 551091055 i • _ h y t_ � . • i • k. ;y BEAM r t7 • • m _ N ` - C N r N • N LA 1 Q/Q 4- 29 -22 - 42 r I• � J 5.0o Ac r N 1 Natr �i�tliry �r.tif►.1. r•.t1V %Q J i v J i J , i r r /TV • 1 1 I t PROJECT 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE N -� kn , I lb \ �r I i i r I• � J 5.0o Ac r N 1 Natr �i�tliry �r.tif►.1. r•.t1V %Q J i v J i J , i r r /TV • 1 1 I t PROJECT 88 -12 BEAM AVENUE N L . y 7 7 I F ID. 04- 29 -22 -42 -0001 ASSMT.NO. 5946 KEITH M C JUDITH E KINNING 174 BEAM AVE M 551091005 N AP WOOD LE ID. 04- 29 -22 -42 -0002 ID. 04- 29 -22 -42 -0003 - -- ASSMT.NO. 5946 ASSMT.NO. 5946 LINCOLN FETCHER & KATHLEEN J KATER DENTON M E MARILYN M VARS 1166 BEAM AVE 1140 BEAM AVE MAPLEWOOD MN 551091005 ST PAUL MINN 551091005 State Project 6230-24 (5=45) Fed. Proj. CRP 0089 (9) R E S' O L U T I O N At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of 1989, the following Resolution was offered by , seconded by , , to wit: WHEREAS the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of Minnesota has prepared: plans special provisions , and specif ica tions f or. the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 45, renumbered as Trunk Highway No. .5, within the corporate limits of the City of Ma lewood- located on McKnight Rd. from Conway Ave. to 1200 Ft. No. of Stillwater Rd.; p , g and seeks the approval thereof ; NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improvement of said Trunk Highway within said corporate limits of the City, be, and hereby are approved including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said construction. City BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the does hereby agree to-require the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within* the corporate limits of said City, on said Trunk Highway, to be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all public streets intersecting said trunk highway. Upon the 'call of the roll, * the following council members voted in favor of the Resolution: and, the following council members voted against the adoption of the Resolution: whereupon the mayor and /or the presiding officer declared the Resolution adopted.. Dated: , 1989* - - Mayor Attes t STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY - City Clerk CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I do hereb y y certif that at said meeting (of which due and legal no Lice was given) City Y of the Cit Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on the day of 1989; at which a majority of the members of said Council were P resent, the f oregoiu& Resolution was adopted. Given under my hand and seal this day of 1989s City Clerk RW1465AF. rl . ` ` AGENDA ITEM k A cti o n �� Coou�cilo . ' AGENDA REPORT --- -~' ` ^ Endorse ' TO. ' . City Manager , �oozzzec�,��_�~~� . ` Rej FROM: Ass City Engineer SUBJECT: Care. Heights Dr and Frank Street from Kohlman Lake Overlook Plat to County Road D, Project 88~09 DATE: February 21, 1989 ' . The mailing list for the Project 88-09 public hearing is hereby transmitted, A copy of the agenda report submitted at the January 23, 1989 meeting is attached for reference. It is- recommended that a through street be constructed on the Frank Street alignment with the south cul-de-sac on Carey Hei�hts Drive and connecting cross street as given under Op 3 of - he feasibility on ordering asibility report A resoluti the project is attached. BAI jw Attachments 4 1 AGENDA ITEM Action by Council. AGENDA REPORT Endorse Modifie TO: City Manager Red ecte _ • Assistant City Y Engineer Date SUBJECT: Carey Heights Drive , Kohl man Lak: a Over 1 ook: PI at to County Road D, Project 88- 09 - -Sc h ed u 1 e Pub t i c Hearing DATE: January ' 18 , 1989 I n t rod uc t i on Transmitted herewith is the f e a s i b i l i t y report for the sub j ec t project. Attached is a resolution to. schedule a public hearings Back ground_ The f eas ib.i.l .i t Y -re ort i dent i f i ed and eval uated three al, ternat i v.e . P conf i gurat i ons'' f or . a potential through street on Carey Heights Drive or immediately to the west on Fran; Streets It was f oun that a through street on Fran; Street with cul -de -sacs on Carey He drive abutting the NSF' and AMOCO easement area provides for ' acceptabl a street designs from an engineering viewpoint . Whereas, the constraints on Carey He i ghts ' Dri ve preclude an acceptable through street from an engineering viewpoint. The selected option also allows for the most cost effective development of the ent ire study areas The est i mated roj ect cost of the construction of Frank: Street .. l P f � � � X439 from Kohl man La Overloo plat at to County Road L i s 985. If , the construction of the south cul-de-sac on Carey Heights Drive is included with Fran; Street as a single city project, then the total estimated project cost is $619,045. In both cases, city cost participation of ap pro>: i mat e l y $82,700 is recommended. It is proposed that the required city financing be obtained from the e};cess financing of the. Beam Avenue project through the state aid street construction fund. The balance of funding would be through assessments as discussed in the f e a s i b i l i t y reports Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution, which. schedules a p u b l i c hearing, be adopted. DAI jw Attachment RESOLUTION ' ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of 32 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, utilities and appurtenances on Carey-Heights Drive and Frank Street from Kohlman Lake Overlook plat to County Road D, City Project 88-09, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on February 27 1989, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1 . That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct 32 foot wide bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, utilities and appurtenances on Carey Heights Drive and Frank Street from Kohlman Lake Overlook plat to County Road D, City Project 88-09, as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same to be made. 2. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said im.rovement. MAILING LIST PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVEMENT 88-09 CAREY HEIGHTS DRIVE FEBRUARY 27, 1989 7: 10 Po MW OTICE AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING PUBLIC HEARING N STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. - COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD ) Lucille E. Aurelius, being first duly sworn, deposed and says: I am a United States citizen, over 21 years of age, and the city clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. On February 10 1989, acting on behalf of the said city, I deposited in the United States post office at the City of North St. Paul , Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of hearing on proposed Project 88-09; Carey Heights Drive, Frank street and Woodlynn Avenue from County Road D to Kohl man Lake Overlook enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing list. There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Subscribed and sworn to before me this ay 19 My commission expire3 12-22-92 NOTICE OF HEARING OF IMPROVEMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ram�ey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be made, NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the city council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said city: DATE: February 27 1989 TIME: 7:10 p.m. LOCATION: City Hall Council Chambers 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 i The general nature of the improvemen t s the cons truction of Carey Heights Drive, Frank Street and Woodlynn Avenue, City Project 88-09, in the following-described areas: Between County Road D and Kohlman Lake Overlook, west of ' Highway 61. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF SAID IMPROVEMENT IS $619,04511 It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement should be present at this hearing. This council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 MSA. Dated this 23rd day of January, 19890 B ER OF THE CITY COUNCIL City of Maplewood Minnesota Publish: Maplewood Review February 15 and 22, 1989 ' � \8\� \ / /u� l PP - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 612-770-4550 r Dear Property Owner: An informal public information session will be held on Wednesday, February 22, 1989, between the hours of 3 p.m. m. and 6 p.m. in the council chambers at city hall, 1830 East County Road B in Maplewood. r Representatives from the city's engineering department w i l l be present during this open house period to explain the general purpose and nature of the proposed Carey Heights Drive, Frank Street, and Woodl ynn Avenue . street, storm sewer and utility improvement, City Project 88-099 It is hoped that we may be able to explain and answer any questions that you may have concerning your property so that you w i l l be well informed should you 1 attend the public hearing on February 27, 19890 Department of Public works PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA PROJECT 88 -09 CAREY HEIGHTS DRIVE kka -- -- I -. - SCALE 1 200' N QQ 4- 29 -22 -12 r _ 7 r ID. 04--29- 22 -12-0001 ID.. 04- 29!22-12 - t ASSMT iNO. 5948 , i � ASSMT•NU• 5948 . V I A . JR MARY IGWA A VE PEYT TALMAGE G CA 1174 COUNTY ROAD D E 551095256 1 " ST 1038 W PAUL. MN 5513.783 bC ST P ►UL MINN _ _ _ ID. 04 29 22 12 0003 ID. 04 - 2g_ 22-12 - 000 4 ASSMT *NO• 5948 ASSMT iNU. 5948 RiCHARO O BARRETT ET AL _ _ TA�.MAGE CAREY 13,74 BOUNTY ROAD E 9525f� 5510 95256 1176 COUNTY ROAD D E ST PAUL MINN 551095256 S�' PAUL MN Io. 04-w29- D • 04- 29- 22 -12 - 00 06 AjSNTiNOi 5948 - AS S`I i NO i 5948 TALMAGE CAREY WILLIAM S LAPP � RAYMOND M LAZAR AS TRUSTEES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE - 1174 Em CO RD 0 STS PAUL MN 551 095256 LAPP LAZAR LAURIE � SMITH CHARTERED PROFIT SHARING PLAN & TRUST - -- 1800 FIRST BANK PLACE MN 55 . MPLS - — 07 I�. 04 29 22 12 00 I D . 04 29-2 2-12 -00 08 ASSMT.NO• . 5948 A�SNT.ND. 5948 - HERBERT H WHITMORE JR ETAL HERBERT H WHITMORE JR E'TAL 513 NAPIER AVE W 510 NAPIER AVE W 20 MI 4902271 BENTON HARBOR MI 490227120 BENTON HARBOR ID. 04-29-22 ID*. 04- 29- 22- - 00 10 ASS MT.NO i 5948 ASNT •NL3 i 5948 . _ TW IN LAKE J NO�AK ASE � BLED EDWARD D HANSFORD JR .1170 COUNTY ROAD D E MN 553.09525 . 128 ST PAUL MN 551274013 ST PAUL _ _, IDi 04- 29-22 i2 �DO11 ID. 04 29"' - 12 -- ASSMT.NO. 5948 AS S dT i ND * 5948 - - 1 ALBERT L FLORENE O BEST DUANE H STOLP KAREN BARNHART 1188 COUNTY ROAD D E 551095256 1134 CO RD D E ST PAUL MINN ST PAUL MN 55109525 MAPLEWOOD I MPROVEMENT NAME 88-09 CHO IMPROVEMENT NO 5943 Pies ID 04 29 22 12 OU01 J ELVIA JR & MARY IW PEYTON IU33 * IOWA AVE ST PAUL MN 551173360 PROPERTY UESCRIPTIO-4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 E 100 FT OF N 158 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 0 T C E F p N D I N G P U B L I C 10 V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD I MPROVEMENT NAME 88-09 CHO IMPROVEMENT NO 5943 Pies ID 04 29 22 12 OU01 J ELVIA JR & MARY IW PEYTON IU33 * IOWA AVE ST PAUL MN 551173360 PROPERTY UESCRIPTIO-4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 E 100 FT OF N 158 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 P E N U I N G N U T I C E 0 F P U 8,L I C I m P k 0 V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME : 86-w09 CHO IMPROVEMENT NO : 5948 .0 PINS ID 04 29 22 12 0002 CARE Y TALMAGE G C 1174 COUNTY ROAD 0 E ST PAUL MINN .>51095256 PROPERTY _qw DESCRIPTI94 Jm4m SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 E X N 158FT LYING E OF CAREY HEIGHTS DRIVE AS SD D RIVE RIVE IS DESC IN DUC NO 1634533$ THE N 1443-BFT OF PART OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYING ELY OF WLY LINE OF SD DRIVE* ALSO, E 130FT OF PART OF SD 1/4 1/4 LYING S OF SD N 1443s8FTo ALSO# S 11OFT OF N 944*96FT LYING W OF SO DRIVEP OF E 9 ACRES OF SD 1/4 1/4 (SUBJ * TO ES4TS) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 P t: 14 N G Ni 0 T I C E 0 F P U 8 L I C I M P R 0 V E M E N T MAPLEWOUD IMPROVEMENT NAME : 88--09 CHO IMPRUVEMENT NO : 5948 P I N" U4 29 22 12 0003 TALMAGL CAKEY f wl.04 COUNT' ROAD D -t SI PAUL MIN 5:51095256 PROPERTY DESCRIPT104 -4w SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX N 1413 8/10 FT PART WLY OF EXTENDED CL OF RD ES4T iti DOC 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 114 OF NE 114 SUBJ TO ESIMTS) IN SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 P E IN D I N G N 0 T I C E P U 8 L I C 0 F M P R U V E h E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME 3 86-09 CND IMPROVEMENT NO : 5948 PINS 10 04 29 22 12 0004 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 S 150 FT OF N 1413 8110 FT OF PART WLY OF CL OF RD ESMT AS DESC IN D3C 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 114 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS AND ESMTS) IN S E-. C 4 TN 29 RN 22 klCHARD U 6ARRrETT ET AL x.176 COUNTY ROAD D E 551095256 ST PAUL MINN P E N D I N G N 0 T I CE: P U 8 L I C 0 F M P R0 V E M E N T MAPLEWUOD IMPROVEMENT NAME S 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO : 150948 PINS ID 04 29 12 TALMAGE LAK-EY 11714 E CO RD D S'f PAUL MN PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUBJ TO ESMTS THE S 218 84/100 FT OF N 1253 8/13 FT OF PART WLY OF CL OF RD ESMT AS DESC IN D3C 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 551095256 P E N D I N G N 0 T I C E 0 F P U 8 L I C I m P R 0 E M E N T MAPLEWOUD IMPROVEMENT NAME-— S 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO 3 5948 PI N S 04 29 22 12 0006 WILLIAM S LAPP 6 RAYMOOO M LAZAR AS TRUSTEES UA0ER THE noVISION.S OF THE LAPP LAZAR LAURIE L SMITH CHARTERED PROFIT SHARING PLAN E TRUST 1600 Flkl.�*)J BANK PLA%?W'E W MN 554021820 M P L Si PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 S 100 FT OF N 1044 96/100 FT OF PART WLY OF CL OF RD ESMT IN DOC 1634533 OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF HE 1/4 (SUBJ TO ESMTS) 14 SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 P E N u I N G" N 0 T I C E 0 F P U 3 L I C I M P R 0 V E M E N T MAPLEWGUD IMPROVEMENT NAME : 88-� 09 CHI IMPROVEMENT NO 3 5948 P INS I D Olt 2 9 ZZ 12 0007 HLR8r`_ H WHITMORE JR ETAL 51.0 NAPlt*k AVE W MI 490227120 6ENTON HARBOR PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 4m SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 224 96/100 FT OF N 834 96/100 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF 44 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 R4 22 MAPLEWOOD IMPRUVEVENT NAME 3 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO : 5948 04 29 ZZ 12 0008 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANG#t-: 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 202 FT OF N 560- FT OF E 4 ACRES OF NW 114 Of NE 114 OF SEC 4 TN 29 R4 22 HEkBERT H WHITMURE JR ETAL .510 NAPIL'R AVE W BENTON HARBOR MI 490227120 O T C E 0 F D N G P U B L C, I M P R. 0 V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPRUVEVENT NAME 3 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO : 5948 04 29 ZZ 12 0008 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANG#t-: 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 202 FT OF N 560- FT OF E 4 ACRES OF NW 114 Of NE 114 OF SEC 4 TN 29 R4 22 HEkBERT H WHITMURE JR ETAL .510 NAPIL'R AVE W BENTON HARBOR MI 490227120 N 0 T I C E a F P E N U I N G P U 8 L I I tiP ROVE MENT MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEME-NT NAME t 8D--D9 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO 3 5948 I U. 04 29 22 12 0009 Rl%-'-oHARD J NOVAK 126 TWIN LAKE BLVD ST PAUL MN 551274013 PROPERTY �aw DESCRIPTIO4 AMA& SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 EX E 160 FT THE S 100 FT OF N 358 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF NE 114 JF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 N 0 T I C E U. F P E N D I N G P U 8 L I C i M P R 0 V E M E N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME : 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO s 5948 PINS 1 u u 29 22 12 OU10 PROPERTY _00- DESCRIPT104 SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 .>UBJ TO CO RD AND WITH RD ESMT AND EX E 160 FT THE N 258 FT OF E 9 ACRES OF 14W 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 EUwAKU U HANSFORO JR 117i COUNTY ROAD 0 E ST PAUL MN 551095256 MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO 5948 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIOA 4w SECT10M 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUB TO CO RD D AN3 SUB TO P INS ID GAS PIPE LINE ESMT THE W 6 ACRES OF E 15 ACRES 3F 4W 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF 04 29 2Z 12 0011 SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 ALBERT L 4 FLORENE D 3EST 1136 il.-JUNTY ROA . D D E 55109J525b ST PAUL MiNN N 0 T I C E 0 F P E i N G P U B L I C I M P R 0 V E M E- N T MAPLEWOOD IMPROVEMENT NAME 88-09 CHD IMPROVEMENT NO 5948 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIOA 4w SECT10M 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUB TO CO RD D AN3 SUB TO P INS ID GAS PIPE LINE ESMT THE W 6 ACRES OF E 15 ACRES 3F 4W 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF 04 29 2Z 12 0011 SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 ALBERT L 4 FLORENE D 3EST 1136 il.-JUNTY ROA . D D E 55109J525b ST PAUL MiNN N 0 T I C E 0 F P N U I N G P U B L I C I M P R 0* V E M E N T MAPLEWJOD IMPROVEMENT NAME : 88-09 CHU IMPRUVEMENT NO : 5948 I D 04 29 22 12 0012 DUANE H STOP KAREN BARNHART 1134 CO RO U ST PAUL MN 551095256 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO4 Amim SECTION 4 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUB TO -CO RD D AND SUB TO GAS PIPE: LINE ESMT TiE W 5 ACRES OF E 20 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 TN 29 RN 22 /7 - 3 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: INTRODUCTION Aotion by, Council� Endor M EMORANDUM - Moozzzec��~____- V ujected~�.�_--- City Manager Dat Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Shoreland Setback Variance (Rear Yard) Crestview Drive Ronald N. and Kathleen T. Schlangen Single Dwelling January 27, 1989 SUMMARY The applicants are requesting approval of a 20-foot-setback variance from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Battle Crsek. Code requires a 50-foot setback; 30 feet is proposed. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Section 462.357 Subdivision 6 (2) of the state law requires that the following findings be made before a variance can be granted: 11 Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique tothe property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property,not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. DISCUSSION The required findings for variance approval wou1d be met. The property is unique in that the storm sewer easement prevents the placement of the dwelling any further to the w If this easement was not there, the house could be placed on the west side of the property and meet the setback from the creek. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would be met since .all other requirements of the x^horeland and environmental protection ordinances would be met as a condition of this approval . These are items such as, meeting the floor elevation requirements (the basement must have an elevation of at least 918), the submission and implementation of a water quality plan for erosion control and tree replacement (the environmental protection ordinance requires that trees be re placed to a maximum density of ten trees per acre). RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the resolution on page 12, approving a 20-foot- setback variance from the Battle Creek ordinary high water mark, based on the findings that: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because the storm sewer easement on the westerly side of the site prevents the house from being placed in such a manner to meet all setback requirements. � 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent ' of the ordinance since all conditions would be required to be met relative to erosion control, water quality management., building grade placement and tree replacement. , . .- Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall spbmit the following plans for approval b the Cit Engineer: 1. A detailed grading and drainage plan indicating existing and proposed grades. The elevation of the lowest floor shall not be lower than 918. 2. A detailed water management and erosion control plan indicating the proposed procedure for construction and showing howthe slope would be stabilized during construction. ' 3. A tree replacement plan indicating the replacement of ti-ees to a densit of ten trees per acre., 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the eleven surrounding properties within 350 feet for their comments concerning this request. Of the sight replies, two persons had no comment, four were in favor and two objected. In Favor Comments 1. When they purchased the property it (the shoreland ordinance) was not in effect--I see no problem with granting the variance. 2. The house style is compatible with neighborhood and front setback is maintained. 3. I am in favor if the house is not over two stories above ~ ground level., Staff reply: The proposed house would be one-story in the front with a one and one-half story walk-out in the rear (see Attachment Seven) . 4. Refer to the letter marked Attachment Five. ObJections 1. The lot was never a buildable lot from the beginning. Also, several neighbors feel the proposed house is higher in elevation from the ground level than any other facing the street on Crestview. If the lot is going to be taxed as a buildable lot, than they have every right to build on it. Staff reply: The lot is being taxed as a buildable lot and is large enough to be considered buildable by the zoning code. As already stated, the dwelling is now proposed to be one-story in height which would be compatible with the neighboring homes. 2. Refer to Attachment Six. Staff reply: The applicants are aware of the special drainage concerns relative to this site. They must take caution in developing their drainage plan to avoid water problems. Flooding from the creek should not be a problem as long as the basement elevation is not lower than 918 (the high water elevation according to the Watershed District is 917). The applicant's propose to realign the driveway if it would interfere with the fire hydrant. 3 REFERENCE 1. Lot area: 20,800 square feet 2. Existing land use: undeveloped Surround-in- Uses Single dwellings, except for Battle Creek to the south. 11 Land use plan designation: RL, Low Density Residential 2. Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Residential 3. Subsection 36-566 2 (b) of the shoreland ordinance requires that single dwellings have at least a 50-foot-setback from the Battle Creek OHWM. Public Works 1. The fire hydrant would have to be moved at the applicants expense if it would interfere with the driveway placement. 2. All grading and fill must be done in accordance with the City Engineer's requirements. Erosion control measures must be implemented. Other A 1. Ramsey County has no problem with this request, but ask that care be taken so there are no detrimental effects caused the creek due to erosion. 2. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources have no concerns. 3. No permit is required from the Watershed District, however, they request that proper erosion control measures be taken. mb\teschlang Attachments: 1. Location Map 2^ Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 44. Applicant's letter of justification 5. Letter from Warren Robens and Henry Dembiczak 6. Letter from Janice and Gary Sherburne 7. Front elevation 8. Resolution 4 c N Y av ERVICE DR ... c +- 11 1 L J 1 235 1 236: : 11240 J ` =�� mo CC rj J C:11 = 7 1' 1 :2251 x2271 vi I Q, 230 - --� o �_ �� L ` I 1 1L.J 1 ! 12241 1 il ........... i ! 1 ) onn , 1 222 I t Loke t I 1 `� ucs 12 ' - °r T. 2 8 N, R.22 w 35 36 > 2 +1 V N N I � Dr Q .••r~ MAY E R A JAMES D R v) J W W Q J -� O W ..f Q U 2 Z _ H V W Cr W Q Q UPPER AF RD N O 2 4 - j - LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment 1 Q N • ! ,,� hodi Td ; h 2 c�A r a' oc,. �, 3 Q ,; �0 4 y �; Gum i of r ar r o 11 5 ' 4 ' 6 o • � � BROOK y ` 10 1 12 !3 ad (t , 14 r 1 • '� -143s L11 �Z P � o i 1 33) 200.9 • � v . I cam.) 155 $ dk 147 0 �. v, 3 -Aff t7 15 Z 140 - 137 4 um�o) A low 1 31 z. J 051 / PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 II RAMSEY COUNTY =1 M =, `r1 t ► , ,� . 1 ' \ f , F ' I i � Aob 1 SITE PLAN 7 Attachment 3 i -- 4 N STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF VARIANCE APPLICATION VARIANCE REQUEST. We, Ronald and Kathleen Schlangen, are the owners of the property which is the subject of this variance request. A Maplewood zoning restriction requires that all single family homes be built no closer that 50 feet from the OHWM of Battle Creek. We are requesting a variance from this restriction to be allowed to build our home approximately 30 feet from Battle Creek; the attached site plan reveals that if this request is granted, the edge of our garage, and the edge of our elevated.porch would be approximately 30 feet from the Creek. FINDING #1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. When we purchased the property in 1983, we were aware of three limitations on build- ing our single family home: (1) a 20' wide sewer easement, (2) a deed covenant requiring a 1,500 square foot main floor (including garage), and (3) the standard 30 foot set -back. The attached site plan shows that that proposed home would meet these three restrictions. Approximately two years after we purchased the property, a fourth restriction was added. Without any notice to the undersigned, the City of Maplewood passed an ordinance requiring single family homes to be situated at least 50 feet from Battle Creek. Undue Hardship. Review of the site plan will reveal that.it is simply not possible to build a single family home which meets all four restrictions. We are asking for a variance from the 11 50 feet from Battle Creek' requirement. Situation is Unique. If it were not for the sewer easement, it would be almost certainly be possible to build a single family home 50 feet or more from Battle Creek. Ours is the only property in the vicinity which has the sewer line running _through it; to our knowledge, no one else will be asking for this kind of variance for the some reason. Nat = Caused by Landowner. We were perfectly willing and able to abide by the first three restrictions on our property. The fourth restriction, requiring the 50 foot Battle Creek. set -back, was imposed on us, without notice, after we purchased the property. We did not cause the situation which would make it impossible to build on the lot under the current restrictions. Will Not Alter Character of Locality. Viewed from the street, there will be no indication that our home will have received any kind of building variance. We are also quite sure that neither the neighbors on the right nor on the left side of our home will even be able to see :he back of our house from inside their homes; consequently, they will not be able to see how close or how for we are from Battle Creek. Retaining walls on either side of the house will protect Battle Creek from environmental damage; furthermore, it is our intention to save as much of the existing vegetation as is possible. FINDING #2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. We are trying to comply with the Battle Creek restriction to the best of our ability; the site plan attached to this application reveals that the proposed home -site is located as far away from Battle Creek as possible, without encroaching on the sewer easement or violating the 30 foot set -back requirement. It is not possible or practical to place the home on the sewer easement. Furthermore, one of the neighbors has indicated that he will not agree to a request for less than a 30 foot set -back from the property line. Retaining walls have been planned for on each side of our home, and to the extent possible the existing vegetation will be saved, which will protect Battle Creek from any environmental damage. We would really like to become homeowners in the City of Maplewood, but we need your help to do so. Under our unique circumstances, we would appreciate your approval of this variance request to allove us to build our home. Respectfully submitted: Ronald N. Schlangen fKthleen T. Schlangen 8 Attachment 4 a 26. '88 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEAR MR.JOHNSON, WE SUPPORT THE CITY GIVING A VARIANCE TO THE CREEK LIMITATION WITH THE RESERVATION THE HOUSE BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOD. BY THIS WE MEAN THE HOUSE NOT DE OF EXCESSIVE HEIGHT ON THE STREET FACE, I.E. NOT TO EXCEED THAT OF A TWO STOREY HOUSE. THIS WOULD PERMIT THEM, SHOULD THEY DESIRE, TO BUILD IN "WALKOUT FASHION" UP TO THREE STOREYS AND IS NOT IN TENDED TO LIMIT THEIR CHOICE OF DESIGN. WE HAVE WORKED WITH THE SCHLANGENS TO SUGGEST THEY REQUEST THE CREEK VARIANCE TO MAKE THIS A BUILDABLE LOT. WE HAVE M ADE THEM AWARE OF OUR CON - CERNS THEY NOT BUILD A "HOTEL SURROUNDED BY ONE STOREY HOUSES". WITHOUT THE VARIANCE THE LOT IS USELESS. WE DISCUSSEDTHE SCHLANGEN ORIGINAL REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO BUILD WITH A TWENTY FOOT SETBACK WITH OUR ARCHITECT AND HE ADVISED "DO YOURSELF AND THE SCHLANGENS A FAVOR AND REFUSE AS.IT WOULD NOT BE VISUALY ACCEPTABLE AND WOULD REDUCE YOUR -AND THEIR- PROPERTY VALUES". IT WOULD BE SOMEWHAT OF AN EYESORE. THIS PROMPTS OUR REQUEST TO LIMIT THE HEIGHT ON THE FRONT FACE. IF THEY AGREE TO THIS FURTHER LIMITATION, WE FULLY SUPPORT THEIR REQUEST. OUR CONCERNS ARE NOT LIMITED TO WHAT WE SEE FROM INSIDE OUR HOUSE. OUR STREET IS A COMPATIBLE MIXTURE OF DESIGNS AND WE WANT TO MAINTAIN THIS HARMONY WHICH CONTRIBUTES TO THE VALUE OF OUR PROPERTY. WE WOULD CERTAINLY PREFER THE LOT REMAIN VACANT BUT DO NOT FEEL THIS WOULD BE FAIR TO THEM. SIN EREL , yw RO � �J EN Y D ^ K���� 140 N. CRESTVIEW DRIVE MAPLEWOOD, MN. 55119 9 Attachment 5 4 To: Randall Johnson, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development From: Janice E. Sherburne and Gary N. Sherburne 137 N. Crestview Drive Maplewood, MN 55119 Subject: Schlangen Variance Neighborhood Survey Date: October 3, 1988 Sorry we missed your deadline of October 1 for comments on the above variance request. Our comments are: 1. The roposed setback variance (creek setback 30' rather than p nd side required 50 and no front a and variance) give us no Y problem in basic concept. proposed elevation of the house and its roof 2. We object to the line because it does not fit the standard set by the rest of the neighborhoode elevation (on my contour dra 3. Observation: The e l wings) of the cul de sac as 933'. The contour of the proposed site plan • driveway sloping down to the indicates a dri Y p g The cul de entire sac fills curb full several times annually. The drainage of N. Crestview Drive is likely to go through their garage. e back patio is at an elevation of about 4. It appears that the P ' We believe the overflow to the Battle Creek ponds at 916 the hi McKnight is at about 920'. Based on h water mark set in 9 summer of 1987, the water has already reached our yard in the summ . the 916' level once. is on Lot 5 and part of Lot 4 of Heckeroth 5. The building site Addition #2. It appears that the fire hydra nt is p laced on the line between Lots 4 and 5, which is about even with the proposed driveway. 10 Attachment 6 . � 1 -- -- - = - - - __ -_- 7 -:-- _- - --'_- - - --�_^• l ��i , 1 1 1 - " -( - -�L � ��'- 4 - t ^' -i Er' :l -� - .- fl SIL r � J L - • _ 117 ! t t -- I - ^ ._ _".. -� • � --. �_� ��._.- I C� � a- .. � �� r' +.��•+ � .�'� -- _ - � -� - FRONT ELEVATION 11 Attachment 7 4 N Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Maplewood City Council was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of , 1989 at 7 p.m. The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, Ronald N. and Kathleen T. Gchlangen applied for a variance for the following-described property: WHEREAS, Section 36-566 (2) (b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that single dwelling have at least a 50-foot setback +rom the Battle Creek ordinar high water markp WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 30-foot setback, requiring a variance of 20 feet; WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this variance is as follows: In This variance was applied for on September 21,1988. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on , 1989. The planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variance be , 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ��EWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because the storm sewer easement on the westerly side of the site prevents the house frum being placed in such a manner to meet all setback requirsments. 2^ The variance would be in keeping' with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since all conditions would be required to be met relative to erosion control, water quality menagement, building grads placement and tree replacement. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall submit the following plans +or approval b the Cit Engineer: 12 Attachment 8 a. A detailed grading and drainage plan indicating existing and proposed grades. The elevation of the lowest floor shall not be lower than 918a d b. A detailed water managemen t an erosion control plan indicating the proposed procedure for construction and showing how the slope would be stabilized during construction. C . A tree replacement plan indicating the replacement of trees to a density of ten trees per acre. Adopted this day of " 19890 Seconded b A STATE OF MINNESOTA ) / COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) 8S. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1989, with the original on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to . Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 19898 Cit 0+ Maplewood 13 Planning Commission -3- Minutes 2-6-89 4. The properties can be" better maintained and used if returned to private ownership. Commiessioner Slztten seconded Ayes --Axdehl v Ayers , ' Barrett, Cardinal v Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Sigmundik, Sletten B. Variance: Crestview Dr. (Schl,angen) Secretaw Olson presented the staff report. Ronald Schlangen, the applicant, was present at the meet inq. � d th ' Commissioner Ayers moved e Planning Commission recommend adpption of the resolution approving a 20-foot setback variance from the Battle Creek ordinary high ° water mark, based on the findings that: '- 1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because the storm sewer easement on the ` westerly side of the site prevents the house +rom being placed in such a manner to meet all setback roepuirementc. 2 0 The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since all conditions would be -' ui/ed �� be met relative to erosion control , '-` t building grade placement water quality mana�emen , and tree replacements Prior to obtaining a building permit the applicant shall submit- trie following plans for approval by the City Engineer: 1 A detailed grading and drainage plan indicating ^ existing and proposed grades. The elevation of the lowest floor shall not be lower than 918. 2 A detailed management and erosion control plan ^ � procedure for construction indicating ��e �rw���se� � and showing how the slope would be stabilized during construction. 3. A tree replacement plan indicating the replacement of trees to a density of ten trees per acre" Planning Commission -4- ` Minutes 2-6-89 Commissioner Cardinal �-_onded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers,' Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Sicamundik, Sletten ` C. Conditional Use Permit: Roselmwn Ave. (St. Paul Water Utility) Ken Haide' Director of Public Works, presented the staff report. Roger MDore Water Production Eng1neer for the City of St. Paul Water Ut.i?ity, discusseC' the conditions of the staff report with the commissioners. John Nowak, 91 East Skillman, discussed the damages incurred by homes in the neighborhood due to abuses by the contractor and he asked for assistance in collecting for these damages. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution based on the fIndings required by code and the following: 11 The use J.s in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare. 3. use would bc- located, designed, maintained, and operated tb be compatible with the character of that �oning district. The Use Would not depreciate propert val Lies 5. The use would not be hazardous v detrimental, or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, du5t, odor, . fumes, water pollution , water runoff, wibration, general unsightliness , electrical interf'erence , or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking weeds that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7^ The use would be serviced by essential public MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: City Manager Plann.ing Intern Rezonin 2811 White Bear Avenue City of Maplewood Ester Schoenber Januar 2, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION -Action b Council Endors'ed...... Re - Date The Cit Council is re a rezoning from F farm residence, to LBC I limited business commercial BACKGROUND On September 26, 1988, the Cit Council re nested staff investigate 'the rezoning of the southwest corner of Radatz and White Bear Avenues from F to LBC, to I imit the spread of high- intensit commercial use south along White Bear Avenue. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL City code re the following findin -for a rezoning: a, The proposed change is consistent with the spirit purpose and intent of the zoning code, b The proposed change wil I not substantiall injure or detract from the use of neighboring propert or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the propert adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequatel safeguarded, c" The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the communit where app icable and the public welfare, g d. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the lo efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection DISCUSSION Rezoning this propert to LBC would meet the criteria for approval outlined b code, would be compatible with surrounding development and Would be in conformance with the comprehensive pl an . RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the resolution on page 7 rezoning 2811 White Bear Avenue +rom F to LBC based on the findings required b code. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the ' � ding property owners within 350 feet their comments concerning , this rezoning. Of the eight replies, two had no comment and six were in favor, In favor comments 1 I am in favor because the property is not in conformance with adjoining zoning. 2.%amin favor but would prefer BC zone over LBC(property owner's comments), ~~ ^ Staff ,epl y: BC zoning would not be compatible with the l and use plan designations. + 3. It would enhance the commercial environment in the area. .- 4. Maybe we will get a signal light, we have had so m y accidents on Carver. ^ Staff reply: The City has already requested that the County investigate this. The County feels the current usage does not warrant signaYizxxtion, but due to the number of accidents, traffic channelization may be appropriate. 5. 1 am in favor because this is on White Bear Avenue*. � REFERENCE Sjte_[escriotion 1. Lot size: .76 acres 2. Current usage: Single dwelling Surroundin Land Uses Northerly: Radatz Avenue and sio |le dwellings. This corner is proposed for development as an auto-service center Easterly: White Bear Avenue and double dwellings Southerl Executive center office building Westerl y: A vacant I otproposed f orfuture park inglotfor the executive center and single dwel I ings Past---Action - Area On September 26,1988, Council approved a plan amendment from LGC, limited service commercial to SC, service commercial and a rezoning from LBC and BC(M), business commercial (modified) to BC, business comnmercial, for the properties to the north for an auto-service center. 1. Land use plan designations: LSC 2. Zoning: F 3. The permitted uses in a LBC district are limited to offices, medical or health-related clinics and day care centers~ Attachments 1. Land use plan map 2` Property 1ine/zoning map 3. Resolution � Pw m P MAP. !- tit sm 0 dope V m O V O --. O m cc 0 Co 0 t . not =a r erjaf Orr, SC f + Esc . few C CRI t r �- L .tr i • • o s .ter_ L 1 .ri : 0 �• �_ RN, . c --- No L LSC% � � 1 • r ha e LAND USE PLAN 1 5 Attachment 1 4 N 1 T. CouptT . t . 0 - - _` :fie __ A v Ir. e- t0 •► • If , •• 1!(i �N •• !14 . • so IF I of 0& (S79) t 1.r � 60 �G5} G r. 14 4 •. ; 410 4) 79 2847 00 •� 2 (20) ��a C22� • 2839 o •sue ►� � « i 1 so C ,GO 2829 law 0 - Moo 12 Cr �S' � o' 140' i o• • N. so• - P. I Z 6 • s o -lie a e2 LT. •1 02. • ''srw 652.53' 's . t ;44 L 11 C t_ br.s.w 3 AV E* Vic a NA ■ � - r C . �s1.s 100' 1910 to too - :� • • 2811 too 32• .4isc 04 6ac. Af ac. .i at- 46iac. . &c. ' 2810 1 ~ w lo w • .. 1 (W ( 25) :, (�s) ' „ - ,.. 2808 ) 2 140 tic 1.13 ac. .b 9 C z� o * 4 9- ' I l0 O� 0 14L !62 O o 52 SZ M 5 C� S 20� 2806 ISO# �- etc i) le � vrRE Ro. . ���• 2804 � ------ - - - - -- 4T G� 34�i I C•'J4,2'Z) !�`�4 C•lS4.so) �" " esi*+ _ -" - _ Opp � 53 P% 4 �. * i 7 ► s 2785 -- • Ica aC. •; LA E D G E SEE CO - -' in eJ ,I • - OUTLOT � PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 9 6 Attachment 2 4 N Pursuant to due cal I and notice thereof , a regular meeting of the Cit Council of the Cit of Maplewood, Minnesota -was dul called and held in the Council Chambers in said Cit on the da of 198 at 7 p.mn The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Cit of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F to LBC for the following-described propert Ex W 1685 +t the N 200 +t of Part of SW 1/4 S of Radatz Ave. and West of White Bear Ave. in Section 2 TN 29 RN 22 This propert is also known as 2811 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood WHEREAS, the procedural histor of this rezoning is as follows: in This rezoning was initiated b the Cit of M pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed b the Maplewood Planning Commission on 1 198 . The Planning Comm issioln recommended to the Cit Council that said rezoning be 3. The Maplewood Cit Council held a public hearing on 1 198 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunit to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations o•f the Cit staff and PI anning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: in The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantiall injure or detract from the use of neighboring propert or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the propert adjacent to the area incl uded in the proposed change or p an is ade y safeguarded 3a The proposed change wil I serve the best interests and conven i ences of the commun i t where app 1 i cab I e and the pub 1 i c we I + are 4a The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the I ogical off icient. and economical extension of publ is services and facilities, such as pub l.ic water, -sewers, police and fire protection and schools, Adopted this da of 198 Seconded b A STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY y SSM CITY CIF MAPLEWOOD I the undersigned being the dul y q ual if ied and Appointed Cl erk of the Cit of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereb certif that I have carefull compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Cit of Maplewood held on the da of 1 198 with the original on file in m office, and the same is a +ul I true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to this rezoning,, Witness m hand as such Clerk- and the corporate seal of the Cit this da of 9 19890 Cit Cl erk Cit of Maplewood F'I anning Commission -5- Minutes 1-12-89 Condition Two shal I be revised as f o I ows: 2. Materials in the storage y ard shat I be no more than 20% visible from the ' residential lots to the south. Be Amend Condition One of the site pl an approval to state: All fencing shall be continuall and properl maintained. Barb wire is prohibited. The fence along the south and east borders of the park�-ing lot shall be decorative wood rather than metal. The fence shall be fourteen feet in height. Commissioner Dempse seconded Ayes—Axdahl Dempsey, Fischer, Larson Na Cardinal, Sletten, Sigmundike Motion failed for lack of a majorit Those voting no felt the applicant had made changes from the original pl an . F Rezoning: 2811 White Bear Avenue The staff report was presented. Donal d Schoenberger 382 Hawes. AvenUe, Vadnais Heights, was present representing thp amplicant. Chairman AJ,.*,,dah1 asked for comments from the audience, There wasn't an who wished to comment on this re reZC-o,!--iJ.nq-, Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution rezoning 2811 White Bear Avenue +rom F to LBC based on the findings re b code, Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Ax dahl Barrett,, Cardinal Dempse Fischer Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten F- f- - � Amt1mo by CourIll 1/ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: Re Modifl City Manager ---~ J� City Engineer .D= ^ Material Extraction and Hauling Permit (CUP) Spent Lime Storage Area North of Rosel awn Avenue St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners Spent Lime Removal and Earth Dike Construction January 31, 1989 INTRODUCTION The St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners (utility) is requesting a permit required by Section 36-585 of city code to remove up to 130,000 cubic yards of spent lime per year over five year period. In addition, site improvements consisting of earthen dikes, retaining walls, and service road construction are also requested. Back Af- 1. On January 11, 1988, the city council adopted Ordinance 619 to establish uniform limitations, standards, and safeguards for construction activities within the city. This ordinance was precipitated by the severe impact on adjacent properties resulting from the utility's activities. 2. In an effort to resolve some of the issues surrounding the utility's activities, a citizen advisory committee was formed. A number of meetings were held to discuss the utility's proposal for future work on the site. (Minutes attached.) Criteria for Approval Section 36-442 (b) requires that approval of a CUP be based on the findings in the attached resolution. (See page 15.) Discussion On February 23, 1988, a Joint meeting was held with the St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners and the City of Maplewood. Several Material Extraction 2 January 31, 1989 legislators and residents also attended. At that meeting, the board agreed to recognize a citizens' advisory committee. (Minutes on page 18.) This committee has met regularly with the utility to discussall aspects of the proposed work. A number of major items are identified here. 1. Screening--this item was discussed at length by the committee and the utility. Ultimately, Park Nursery was hired by the utility to develop a plan to screen those residential properties abutting the spent lime storage area. This plan involves a series of retaining walls and tree plantings (plan attached) . The final plan was reviewed by the committee and at an information meeting with affected property owners, appeared to be acceptable. Timing of = screening installation, however, is important. The ' screening work should be started'before or at least concurrent with other proposed site work. + It should be noted that the ordinance requires certain .- setbacks; and the retaining wall and tree plantings are within the setback. This work is not part of the extraction ^ operation, but rather an attempt to mitigate the impact of the operation on surrounding property. For this reason no variance is considered. 2. Noise--the MPCA conducted noise monitoring in September 1987, and found levels exceeded State of Minnesota standards. The City of Maplewood has purchased noise monitoring equipment and intends to occasionally monitor noise levels on the site. Hours of operation are also a concern. Given the proximity of the work to homes and the long duration of the activities, limiting the hours of operation is in order. The permit would allow noise within state and federal standards between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays. No work would be allowed Saturday, Sunday, or legal holida 3. EIL(St--dLISt control has been of particular concern to many residents. Particulate monitoring has been started for the utility by the St. Paul Health Department. Property owners feel it appropriate that if the need arises an independent testing lab be available three (3) times per year to insure compliance with state standards. In addition to monitoring, several operational concerns have been addressed. The utility has paved portions of the main driveways to and from the site. This should aid in dust control on the site. The proposed specifications for the work require the contractor to control dust with calcium chloride and provide sufficient equipment including a pick up type sweeper for dust control on and off site. Material Extraction 3 January 31, 1989 4. Vibration--the utility is proposing to contract with an independent testing firm tomonitor vibration levels as a result of the construction activities. This would consist of establishing background levels prior to construction followed by monitoring during construction. The American National Standards Institute and others have established limits on vibration. 5. Dike construction items are important concerning dike construction. The first is the elevation of the dike around the north lagoon. Traditionally, the top has been approximately Elevation 895. This should be established as a maximum dike elevation. The second concern is dike construction along the north and west side of the north lagoon. A revised plan was recently submitted by the ~ utility showing two new ponds and relocation of the west dike. This arrangement appears to be acceptable if construction progresses from north to south. Recommendation Adoption of the resolution on page 15 based on the findings required by code. Material Exrtraction 4 Januar 31, 1989 REFERENCE Site Description 1. Acreage: approximately 50 acres 2. Existing land use: spent lime lagoons Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: residential Southerly: residential and water treatment plan Easterly: residential Westerly: Soo line railroad tracks 11 Land use plan designation: OS 2. Zoning: F 3° Ordinance Requirements: a. Section 36-437 allows the city council to issue a conditional use permit for mineral extraction in any zoning district. b Section 36-583 allows the city council to issue a material extraction and hauling permit in any district allowing mineral extraction. C, Section 36_588 allows the city council to grant a permit for up to five (5) years for an overall plan. Implementation of the overall plan will be by means of renewable annual permits. d. Section 36-442 (b) states that approval of a conditional use permit shall be based on the findings in the resolution on page 16. e. Section 36-442 (c) states the city council, in granting a CUP, may attach to the permit such conditions and guarantees as may be necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The initial .conditions may include a provision specifying a termination date for the permit. KGH Material Extraction 5 Januar 31 1 1989 jc Attachments: 1" Land use map 2. Zoning map 3. Site plan showing proposed dike construction 4, Appl written statement 5. Minutes of St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners and City of Maplewood joint meeting. 6. Resolution 7. Minutes of citizen advisory committee meetings .REVISED 3 - 2 10 -2 IP ■ • • • _ } F5 i E . 3 ,, 111111111111111 INt1111111�1111 � 111111 NINE ■ i NONE , ,�■,■, wom NINO os ST i .' i MES .1 1111 alga" ■11 fvry • ���•� .., Lois I do fiiififf� ffifita 0 r �� � � � r � ... fiifira � ..• � 'r � '� - �--- • • - w�FIA •�►hi:iJrlli�i�'f.�2 T :•:.i._�11' .n�3► ps•.��rr.., .�.�.� �i9. w f••r:lr. r♦S�.`i!'� w.•�rb:J^'.:ywwr.w•. •tw «.�.•� Int©rchange ME ii �i ii Now i= ii NEI ON LSC V Z 0 St. Pa'tit\ I i (tnalOf ar . Mal I I II h t 'p` 1 Interchange WESTERN HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 19 -5 r► inl�wl +'ry wA._.- •- r�.w� -+�.w .I- r• .. ♦ - ..L i i.* ', . - J. V • i, . _. I .i ' "' . !> ate liar•• lWw.'wr / •�•••v -.'► � .l.�.r � a j ,^ • • i SIR t r. i. ' ..5.. _v a 7•; '�i" w r•,' �. J f \ . ��' M ~ 14 tar i ^y �r+i - } • ti ^• . 1 � �t V. �t. •�• .. �+ ov t K ' r IF `a•rr,i•I!� ��fit 1 •, `�� •�� �•�'c,••�' ItL' .:p!"' {� '�.. •`. \,y:� .. * ���I, /f': . 1 / �•� I iu. lb • * '' '••t -:� �-4 'tom � � ��� `-1�, �i � 'r� ~ ` -� •: ,�`•' � r•� •�•�r�.�'�� ~:f r stir• �,L.ti..�• •�s �;►..� {� f ♦ � • �y� dw Olt .►�?` ` Jf ' • • �• ` 1 o . 71 ; ,f. *-� • • -.�, ,i s s•' �'� •r;,�1` } '�� fit, _ - "'+�.. =•*•� �Z -"',i r Jr �•: r:" zli �* . i 751�L ' V di to i sl, y t ?7 r,'4 KE RELOCATION er �i •'41 . • ♦ ti + , ti ll r LOCATION 02 � . • •,.. , �• , .. , �. � `,� ,3 � it to It , - • „ .�!• �• .1:+1 ' �.3i..•..rs- ► 1 r 1 C,r: •r - .4 • :• `" f' � �� � I � a 111 .. �+- J .•} i ; oil I A 7 yss qr X AMA %L rx t. i s F- �r 1,. Jti .�• i �� ,,r. ' ., - 4 { � �' '� • •� �• •� `�.�' ! ��'�t� l} �`: ►. , •it�i ' `� on • � c. / �• i�.' , f ,, � �, •• �. 1. f: J• .fie * ;�` !^s � ^• 7 �•�"'( - *� ' Zi ` ti .• -�� '•.� - • sC" r �.. •, .S> •1� y R �� '' i � ` y ` �, I� j �► ,. s .•. _ r • lI t ► } - t . r - ��T n,l �. i y �j • , •�%Y` �i.ri � /I.� r •�j /! r 1 "th r• ?ar' J'+.� !' ! ��•; �• ! • 'i_•„� +f� i # t.i�'�st tY7l►'aC 7• • �! r✓ t •{i !� �i T �` • �•�.�•( 1 ,. `1 b Is AiX �' ( !`�Z S� � ♦ � t '!• � f .tir• • �1 i �•• � �'s � '• 71 i� �� �y��ti • �. v " ♦ �� � � .r � fys ,' , r x• ,i•., J .,• I) 1� f 1 �� � �L.�1Y � iJ � R� � gat •;r. • �'Lr e�.. �: A +. •�' :Z'f .��� --- -- j�.► t �` 11: 41L J ;1► , �...�t.�1�M`. -• y •r/,,f��i{ .. ! 1� �• • . ,t{, ` •• , r : �. r„� ' ,•. ,.,',)•_ "�TwI/A 0, ► r ` `,•�• ( •••�� ;S •• j,f • / n'►�rt ...�ir+.:+.Y"�f�i '•� : q� I� , .1 ' .ry� w. R +�� + ;f [ ` lrr :, �_� H y' ' 7 4L y lid 4 ' � t /� �..r� �- ♦,/ • • w• 7 ai;. may.. , f r 'N. ..� . •� `[ . •.J � �•• �/ i f� t '' �': • .� . <'� .V ../1.. �.y�r� • rt �� , .. }�1 ^ `� 4M� a • �1a.pr�•'�J3yA�✓ • L���'��� .nom -f - •�\ J �,^ �'� �� '� ry + r t , 1 1 .. t� y�:.•r ��"."_�- -� J . .41 r7. 1, rrn, .� �,f i -. ,[.7 - ..�, �. r r '� ttf'' :���� Li '- . {��•+y �'�"/ � 1►.L� ��� =s��! .i - •.....a/ "' .. �.- ... _.� .. -'r -- �3' ^��.d� _• _ Yir..:� -a {�GY• ` �= •= �Z1�.Cri'. �. �. .-_.w.+.4.vr��.va•...wwR•« �-r .•.ati• -r. .•a..._.� -. v,.. ^" _ _ '� -•cam _ Is WILL j _ ' ' fi' : ,'1� �' '�.� 1 • - .1 11 6 _.lam' �.,�.�'.�`7 ' I r -..� • r r' t } M } •: r r I sir R: .� �ANr •mod[ • r ss `• ���•. � 1 � t � ; t J 1 rr- VJ i�"` x wbir A DAW3UNS / SUBURCAN ACK- N- • G' S I G A R D ^F IN •— — r. _ --- -- - /1 _ ! �►:--� Z.z�.as�— - — 71 imp w so o- „• •.. oto (t) �• �;i•:• ::: i•:A� ::::::: 7.OZEc. .1 �ir, a. (S� (4) (1) ,,►T•. • iiael • col �• • • • • •• , 0000• 0000 0000•- ••••••'•'•� o I .'x'/10 O'G o >: ••t: ' ' !1 1.4e •+ • 0000 ,•••i••, llce.ee•.•• r 1 It ••• P_ •Ql.e• •:• �••••• •.e.•• i ece..•• �� is o.0- • • f• • • •' • • • •" • '• • • • �• •; :::: : -• 0000•• 0000•�•;:::e•: ,0000• OZp I� �7� •'i' oc ♦� •::•••'r••••• ..•••,o..•.•diescill •e• 0000 .• / ••• �•.••• 0.000• 000...e..0• .•::; B. of W. C. • • • • • . • e e • • t Or ' 0000• ••• • ,0000• li:::::::::•••••••►•� '0000• 0000••• jC • • • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • • ... • .-0 • • .• • e�, • • • • e • • • • • • , • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • ...... -• • :: • • H - 1fo01. • �m •:::: 00!00••• .•e..e• ,••••••••••••••...•+ I Zp' a. - s<..... 93•S� I ...... ... • . 0 ............. 0 • • • • • . • ...... ........................ ...•o...... ,..........•.•..:I .... �. / (13 I =' • • ::: '•;:::: ' •:::::i •.••••••••••.•:0000• eeeedise•..e t • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • .• , 1 Imo•` •::: ••�.••0.; •• .[�;; ' •. •••. 00.00••• 0000.•• •.. e• •,.00Gas: J •t►•••: �i7b ••.•...s••••••• ' 27 / ,I.r� • ••...••..•.••••• C •..•••..••••..•....: ••OX. : • •• ,•.....•••••..•••.•••...•••• Y 41 ....41, ......... • .. . • • . • • • . • e • • • • .... • • • ..... • • ... • ... • . • .. • • • • .. • • . • . • 1 ti M Mi Ike� • • • • i • • • • �i • • . • ...... • .. • .. • • . • . • ... • • • .. • • • • • . • • • • . • • . • ' I� p, • • e�ie • • . • • Jam.. • .. • • .. • . • • • . • • • ... • • ... •• •• ::::::.. • • .. • .... . I •$ ••• ;::: •••...•.....•.•.••.••.•.•....•• • ::... • ........ • .. •• • . • • • ... • e • ... • • .... • . •,� :: 0.00• ;:::::•r''K...........••.•....••...••...•..•.....•.• G 000:00, ••••�; 0...0..00..•• O V • . • 0 • ... • • • ... • . • • . • .. • • • • • . • • .. • • . • • e • • .. • . • • • • . • .. • • • • • .. • . • ,.; ; ::::::::::::: • O n ` o C so*0 : ::::• •••....••.•.•.••..•...•.•••••.•.••.•...••..••....• 0 / so Ge co G eGoal 0 eee . .......... • • • • • ::::::::: ; ' • • • Ga �•�••....:::.•.......-clocil ........................'........:t 16 ... • . , • e e •. • o ... e e . e e . • .. a •............. • ... '.............. . oci O • • • • • •oo • ; :Go 0 0 1�•F Y J r ::1 : ::1 ::: • • 0 • • 0 e • •Go li1,S3(i� (�) •') ::i.e�e "ee• see ecce••e••eec••s.eeeee.ce0M.Gi .e• 1 ..eee • • • • • e . e .eee . e e • e • • . • o • . • . • e e e e • 1 /• • . • • • • • .. • • . • • • • .. • • . • • • . • • • • • . • • . • • • . • • • . • • • • . • • • • • • .. • . • • • ........ • . • • • • • • • • e • • • e ••.• • ; e e e c e c c e e e e e .. e. c e e c e 0• e ...so*..eee . e e• • • O.O.O.G. `tJ N•� •e . • e • ' e000. e . e e e e .. e e • s.e .. • V .'1 •• ::: •' :::::.o . i•:::: a 000000 i0 000000 i& i �� i i •io; 0 .::� !e i•• ie: a ie:::e :';': ;eon; ;•• ;!; . i•� ,l e 00*cc.00• (S.) • • . • • ` ' ... •'�• ........ ... • . • • • e 0 0 e • 0 . e e • ............ -- .}33•SS ..................... ................ a ........... • e ............ •Q• .i.. .. a .................................................... ................................... �ssi-.. .......Soal ................. ••...... �1 •. ............:::::::::..ee ...... .............. •. ........ • • . 00 • 0 • • . • • e .. • • • o ::: e c 0 0 ... e e e 0 • e • • 0 0 • • • • 7 e ' I jo a• r ::' ::. ;�: :. . Go . ' oc cl ' ;: ;::;:' :•ti ' :' ':'::� :'::::::':0::0::0::0::•::•:''f i 27 . �` ::� .....•....... I ..� .................. I ::: ••• :::::::...0.00• .0.00 . ................ Go ....... ............ .... ...................... .. • • . ............................... ooscsos'sol .•............................. ........... ... ......... . ••- .... :::: • .............. •... • .. • e ........ • .... ...... sG e . .......... . ............................. `.. •...... •.............. ............. ........... eeeeeee•e.G% escie•ec• 0.000• •.....•.ee•eeee•.e••• . " AS2�2! •Go ti•:: • :::..............e.. t ................... Go ....... ..o ............................Go ........ . • e • • .. . ............ . ...............•..................•e............e. A 11. ................................... ................. . .� .... ......... ........ . • ............................ . ....... .....•..ol • ... . •to . • . • • • . • • • • • • eee X. • e e • • • .. • • .. • 1 sait so • • • • • • • • • • • , • . • • • • • .. •:::: • eee • • .eee • . • • ' . ::�� • : c • ; ... • • • • • . • • • • • eee • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e eee .. • ... • • .. • . • • . • • .. • . • • G. • . • • . • , • • • • • ,! :: • :.8: ; :: • .eee .. • • • .. • • . • • . • • • .. • • • • . • • • • • • • f . •.e••e••.••ee.eeee...• •eee • . • • • • • • • 1 . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • e. , • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • e ... , , . • . • • . • • e; 4 . • . • • • • • • • • • • • eee . • • • • .. • • • • . e • • • ... • .. • • •:: • • •. s • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • . •to • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • . • • • eee • .. • • . • , F.• ;. ...;:::: ..................... .............. ........... • ... .:. ..•.. . . • .. . .... ... .... ..... ....... ...... ...... • .. 6 ..... .. ;:........ ... ............. 1 .............. .... ..co co r.. Go- -a ... ..............................• ..... ............ ...... vil 1 ovooce. ol cl • v .#► .. .... .... .. •� f�•�•• ..fib '►s}tRl +X ' ::. t ..,• . :•:..e. ::::.. ... •• :. .::.. .. lisce �k,c... ......e....e.e::..... ..... o a co co ..•:i -:I •...•ee.....to ••.•••.••• .0000• .•.•. , e. 0000 ••.eeeec•.••• e..e..e.• ...••.••e• �r •o so •:i �i:•i:•:i•i::fie:::::•••• •...•..•::::::::• ••••••••••.•.•••::::•.••••• , • eee • • • . • • • • • .eee • • • • • s e • • c • • • • • • • • so .eee .eee • Notes, • , ` ; ::: : : : • • • • • •eee X. • • • • • . • • • • .eee ... • • . • • • . • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • ... • • •eee ... • • • i 7 It • A'�r•• • s •• •e•.•ee•e.e.• , •.eeee.••e• •ee..eeee::e..ee••.•.••.e• •:::: stb.Xc : ::. • • • • • • • • •::::::::::: • • • • ' ' ' • • • • •. • e .• • • . • . • .. • • • ,011 ••• •• . •• .••••••••..•• • •eee..•;0...0.00••• / •eee .. • • . • .. • . • .. • .. • • • .. • ... o.. .............. •::f:: `r: :: ::::::::::::................ee.•.....................- 1 - - _ ............................................. o• • • :: • ::: e••.•.••••••.• a .••••••••••••.••• ''iiia::• --��- 11 �• • • .Ye • e . • • • • . • •; •::::.� . .. e e . e c .. e c e e . • e e • e e • e .. e . e e • • . e . e e ... • .... e . e ' • e • • e • .. • e• e e e e e e e e e e e e e •eee ••• f ................................................... ...... • •:::fi•:.....................•........................... ,p. ..... ..ti e e . •.y-•• ........ . .•• 1 `, a?~::• e . •..•e ::::::::::::: • e ••L :•i "''++rri a.�ti eis"e- ' • f •.• / • • •::: : • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •:::::::::::: . I • • • . •eee • • • • e • .eee •eee • • • • • • .. • • • . • • •eee • • . ...•e. 0.000• 0000 •••••.•••e••••••••.••••••.••••• • • . • • • • .. • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • ... • • • • • • • . •:::: • • •: • • e • .. • . • • . • .. • • • • �•� + • .. • • • eee . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • . • • • • • 0000 ••••••••••••.•.••.• Vie;;. ....eee:::.• IZ.Q pC • ♦•e. . ...e.•• • • . • • , • • • • •::eee . •eee • . • • e • • . • • • • • • • • • • .... • • . • • •eee • • • • e' • •eee . • 1 . e e e e e e. e e.•.• �!y • • . • • • • . • • • • .eee •eee . • • • • . • . • • • • • • . • e • • • • • .eee • • . • • • . • ... • . • • , - �• �I •• • •<• ...ee•• • • • . • • eee • . • • • • •eee • • .eee • • • • • • • • • .eee . • •eee • ..eee • . • • • . • • �= N h '::•b• ::..�e..e.e•e. ..:::: .•... .... • • . • ............. .0 •; ::: : .... • • • :.. • • e • • • . . ........ .. a .. • ... • . • ..........ee.e.e................e...e• •• •• • ,••.•e.... ,0000•....• �•.; •• _ J ::e•.•e.• • ti. &K Ami F5 i1 0. 000..0•.• •:::•::e.e• •via 3 t I ... •::::::::. see •: ......... e . �......... f' , to !9 t3 G S I • • ♦• • • : ; ::::::::::: ,(!) -(,) (IJ �1;��'ZI.) (21) l!•. •. :: ��'Go *:*#**see•'• e: •• •; :: • iV6 Goe ee tee•:: �• •' www. � D so "Gosse"ooessits.s. , C H 0 • • , • • . • • • • • . • t ('• so* 1 •• . •e •e6 ee • • • . e . • �'` (Jd) I i i� (22) (orf,; �J+� �57� ��'R'� �Ddi (JO� C2i�Tut'si I (11) (LL) �S)02-0 :e: ...•:::::: o * • ::::: 1 j12 OOB ,•. e a e, ........ ••;::::::: d 6 4 -�` �r-1 .��1�1►��r I , I . (:. , sce .6 .. col, ........ 1 t �► ►o so to • ::: •.• •:::::ee::: ecisese ;;::::: i'e 1 •• .e ��• c.eeee0.see•e• ocsol,.....• • . i-�1 - -r- .�•.� 1 1 , 1 r .. ..... , ��1 I�ZI23 :::::I( :::' ' ::: ' �(�� I ` :G:G:s:GsGl I ..� Go, ::• . •e..e.e •.e••ce••• (4 Ll �(•�S) .•4 ,. l _ •T 7 , '1��� .. ..... • ::::::::::see:::::::•::' 1 G I L(•') I r ; ; •: {. so. t so •............................. 1e V E R N O No . (a) a ■ r �i................ ......•:::: __ i1 •�/ ::: t i • • •� :::::::::: e•::: • .. • • • .. • .. • • • Il tl , I (�) I (••) (f )) I (� /) I (J •) (S S) : 7a, • • !-.i1.: :: e . eee .... e e •eee . e • 1 �.. 1 _ _ (S2� 7 •� - :.. . . .ee.c•i�.e•.cc0eeee.0e.ee•...ee•c• „ 0 O (L1) l�5), 9 6 , s z I _ .V5' .. e • ............ •::::::::. t I (ii 14 i IS 1•� .... .., . ....;;.......; 0; ... a e;;;: •.. e • . e.. _� - I Get •• •e• e.• .,.e•e• e0000e eeGo s.•_A_•-e�•e+e• •:::::: • IZ - _- - S 1 • .. • . • , ... • • • • •eee . • • • • •::::.. • • • c • • ` _ - - - cl ice_ �� .::o so :::..........:::::: t r T I a- �r .........: , . ... T •:::......... , I •• , I Z� 30 31 32 ... ► 1 I .......... 7ooe. ... ere .............; ....�;:::::::::::,�, s _e. so, Go.'.le. ....r........;;;;fir• •elcisce ..�s� 3 Z4 25 ZL .... 1-7 IS 1 9 12c 1 � q ,S '75• i5 � � �l.T , Go & O •• . .e• ;•.ee.e •ee.eeee.ee•;:•�;•:::: • •...•.e.e:'. -.�-� �4)'4 r . • , on-. •,,xo fee`• .... • •�.; ::::: o ..; :•:::......::::::::: ii --R -DOWN S .. • .... . • • .. • .. ... . .;; •1 .... e . e . • e ... e 0 0 . • ........ 0 .. a .. • ... . V �� •• :.: •.....••.e11 0000.• _ I • ::::::::::::::::::::;tip ..... � �, • • • • . • . • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ..eee • • • • • ` CIS) .1t J� 1. `. • •�• • •::: • • ....eee • • . e . • ` I (!7. (�Y) (.�f I .5• I 5). �' �L I ,!i �.1 • •••j0•••••.ey..•..e.....•e...•f •• • •:::::::: �..• 1 ::.:: • • • • • • • . • . • ... • • • .. • • • ....... • ..to to... • 8 S :: •::• •'Iso • 1 •••..e.•..to •••.•••. ••••..••.• ,tom Lit 10 1 •• • • , •.... •. •. •.. • • • O:O:ems •• •• ecoseci.ecece.e.e..0ee •.eeeee•.cc..c•....e•;'•0• 'S-- (7 •1$t.D•L.o.40d PI • i : ~�: •• : ;! �•!; :: i e: • i e ie:: :: �i;•�e� • � e� ;: !:::e i ire ice:; : •i'e - _ _ •- - - I - - _ T T •f . (0 - 1 ... eee0.e e.0ee.• .0..ee• ...ee.• .....e••.:....•ee S 1 1 1 I �S 1 Lam:• I �J�1 tA. c�lt� O' o .. ... ..•e..e ..e.ee e..•ee .eee.. .....• .•..• • °' e•e• •• •.ecce•• ••ee•ee•••• ,•ee...•e..•..• I V 155; j �1 I _ e• • ... . I� ' �5 1 �i7 • 0,� .. • • ••�(1e . e • . • e • c e *:so ... c • . • • . • a. ; .e.l I �•.et ' (10) .,ei 1 J • .. • . •o , • • • • • • • ... • ; • .. • • ... • • . • .. • .. • • ... • • ... • .. • • • . • • 11 .. - �• wow • e e eee .. c e . • e • . c • e • . c . e e .eee a .. Is osso col Its_ 6 �- r_ 1.1 ! - -•- - T--- I •; .aa>�toll,,� - o , - t t t 2415 _,ts4.0 .. --�� --T ` ,►�f♦ 11R � Ir 11 I in 1 1- "__T�-�� �•5. .,�b 16 1w '1 6 1 4 R ,. A, ; • • ; y ro r 2 1� r , ' —..�, 4 ..,. I ,� ! ,� to I • i �' t O4 to , IM C I ! �' A. 1' � 22� -� ---- � •� • v Fyl RG ��'•.J'..0 +� ol: _WOOD �� *�-_ i►3.c5..�.)• �. ► it •~ 1 _ • _ _ 0 A, --f APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO EXTRACT AND HAUL SPENT -LIME 1. Owner/Operator:.' Saint Paul Board of Water Commissioners 400 City Hall Annex 25 W. 4th Street Saint Paul, MN 55102 2. Legal Description of Extraction Property: Attached 3. Certified Abstract of Adjacent Landowners: Attached 4. Appropriate Maps, Aerial Photographs, etc.: a.&b.) Physical relationship to community and site topography See attached aerial photo and topography Exhibit "A" c.) Description and quantity of material extracted See attached copy of University of Minnesota Civil Engineering report of March 26, 1987, for description of material; Exhibit licto Quantity to be excavated: 1988 contract - 90-130,000 cubic yards 1989 it- 90-130,000 is" 1990 it- 90-130,000 it. " 1991 to- 90-1309000 " 1992 to- 90-130, 000 " d,) Area Water Table. Water table approximately 23' to 24' below ground surface See attached Braun Engineering Soils report dated May 31, 1988; Exhibit "D" -2- 5. Purpose of the Operation: Excavation is required to , provide space for disposal of spent - lime and centrifuge centrate water from the Utility's water softening op eration. The coagulation, flocculation and sedi- mentationP rocess of the water softening operation is an essential part of the overall treatment process. The sedimentation process is an essential part of the pre-treatment for purification of the water that provides a safe and potable supply for the Utility's 380,000 customers in the Saint Paul Metropolitan area. 6. Estimated Time Required to Complete Operation: The disposal of spent -lime and centrifuge centrate water will be an on- oing process that will continue into the forseeable future. g The application is for a period of five (5 ) years, after which PP another application will be made, as per Section 36-588(a) of the Material Extraction and Hauling Ordinance. Reference attached proposed 1988 spent -lime hauling contract (Section XI which states that the 1988 portion of the permit will end July 1, 1989) 7. Plan of Operation, Including Processing, Equipment, Location of Plant, Source of Water, Disposal and Reuse of Water: The 1988 P Plan of Operation) location of extraction to be performed and operations restrictions on the excavator /hauler are fully covered in the 1988 contract. • source and reuse of water is not a part of the The disposal, w extraction process. Any excess water is routed through normal process back to the Water Treatment Plant. 8. Travel Routes to and from the Site: Reference erence Exhibit "B" and Section Vlll b. of the proposed 1988 contract for hauling routes, entrances and exits, and staging areas. -J- 9. Plans for Drainage, Wind and Erosion Control, Site Security, Sedimenta.tion'and Dust Control: Reference de attache- Proposed 1988 -Contract Sections IV, V, VII A & B for dust control and particulate monitoring. In addition, the Water Utility is working with the Saint Paul Public Works Department to oil the main traveled road through the lagoon area, see attached Exhibit "B". The Water Utility Engineering Unit is researching the total lagoon area for other dust control measures, such as paving portions of the main road and installation of "mud" grates. The extraction site is entirely fenced. The intent of the extraction is not to remove or disturb naturally existing soils. The -material extracted has been deposited over a period of time from the water softening operation. 10. Geology Report: - of geology report site, adjacent to neigh - Reference attached COPY g gY b Braun Laboratories, boring property, as preparedY dated May 31, 1988. 11 Rehabilitation Plan for Lagoon Area, using Photographs, Maps, and Surveys: a,) Existing contour map aerial topography map showing relocation of See attached a large lagoon dike relocation to the nor north and away from r� ides main concentration of houses; Exhibit A . This coinc • Utility 's plans for reduced activity in the with the Water Y large homes by establishing the lagoon area closest to t princl • pal spent-lime/centrifuge centrate ' water basins fur- ther er awayfrom those homes. It is the Utility's to plan minimize the area needed for settling of spent -lime solids. ' and Hauling Contract specification (Section The 1938 Extraction requires that the contractor correct and restore any VII 6) re q revious condition. damaged area to at least its P The Water Utility ilit has begun seeding previously damaged grass areas and will continue to repair damaged areas. has agreed to furnish visual screening for The Water Utility g areas . The Utility property owners adjacent to the lagoon 'stance has retained Park Nursey to provide information and asst to adjacent property and the Utility, on appropriate live screening. The proposed live screening will effectively isolate the lagoons visually all from the adjacent houses and will reduce noise, and particulate concerns. -4- A design for screening has been prepared by Park Nursery, reviewed and agreed to by adjacent property owners, and a copy of the final. design is attached and marked Exhibit"E". The Water Utility, as a part of the screening design, Proposes to construct a Lof f elstein wall to augment the screening where the terrain requires. A copy of the proposed wall layout is shown on attached Exhibit "F". Cross-sections of the wall layout along the south side of the large lagoon and east side of the small lagoons is attached and marked Exhibit "G". The wall design has been reviewed by Mr. Marry Schroeder, registered Architects see attached statement and brochures* The con- struction of the Lof felstein wall and screening placement is planned for the fall of. 1988, or: earlier if weather conditions permit. The wall and screening planned will necessitate the excavation of spent -lime, the placement of earth fill, and the relocation of the spent -lime discharge line. These activities will require that construction work take place directly adjacent to neighboring property. The Water Utility requests a waver of Extraction Ordinance Section 36-595 a, b, c, and d to allow construction of visual screening facilities. As areas of the extraction site become available for rehabilitation the Water Utility will submit a plan for reviews 12. Citizen Advisory Committee: A citizen advisory committee has been established to deal with resolving conflicts, responding to complaints, etc. The Utility 1 g has demonstrated its intent to comply with the permit requirements by modifying the excavation/hauling contract to meet the concerns of the adjacent property owners. , Roger A. Mohror, Production Division Manager, (ph. 612-489-1051) has been designated as the responsible party in charge. Emergency after -hour numbers are 489-1600 (Treatment Plant) and 298-6888 (Distribution Office)* 39C •_� ------------- I It 4b Ll \� ( 1J I • p �� D I n 0_ CJ 117 Cl CI I] Cl I p I I� �� � ❑ t. l -L :•, \`\ ..i i � , t ❑ i �[ ! � Irk U uj I I I _ I' I \' 1 l° oCj CJS Ej. I ,! I �w 1oil JJ , D oD lJ ,r � 1 Dr -1 u LU 1, C ! rr}}a Ft LI C3 o . D -o FJ I L I I-] 9 =7 IN,i] h ' El 0 n j 0'- �3 1 VN CC O i \ �g > W CcW I ¢ f `�•� / ,� ice' ��� \ � � = rn W / i ` �• \ W • moi'' • 1 / : �_~ / ~ '� 11 \ �, � ".. i ,I , E Xl+ I 1� ir \ r Fj I SrT- 6t ___ ASW • i'" • � - ; . '~ .... .�_.� _ ..�.. •.•►-...y_r. _..... _.. _. .. ... ..- .. ._ _�.__ -�. ,. .. qtr �_ ^_ ' HCl _..•�_,.r� :��' . '^ - . •�', .� ,�,.►�,,.: •,, /,,. . `i ,. �• #� r r� • l�.% 1'. • ,' _:\ 1� ..•�.A q .:, r to�•,�,1tt ," 't i1 Jam: 13'3 j IYI l,►7 -_`r��= !41 :_ ..: - Zp 1� ' � ` � . •, , � : Y. •. -' • ;'; ,:; . • � • . � .. �+ wt� r.. av - � �... ..�--.-�. . dam. •; • 1. •, . � . tom• �Na� y�; • SrT- 6t ___ y • •. .L _ , • �•.. , y� ,• •'i•. • r. , .b ..'- '� •w. • O '1 {r •{,w •• 7 - r• � I. ; ,r. a,? - 1..J rV{• - 'r_ r- . -,A ^ f , ; .( . ,�. • • , - �. ,•. ,� •• , • .• - • .! , .. ' aF' ,�•' , ♦ 1j. I • . r •+ ,t , • • .'� '• &" �. 1 • . _ 1 •% . ! . •, • j-, ...4 :�1 . . �,.. ' : � : •' 1 •, ! t ^ , 1 •, -•t , 'L , ` yt � , 1 -� v 41 . . ti. ' r . . i N Y t .. J _ • . r �' S -a• - .. ,: ...✓ I� • ',.. i a ~ ' '•• • � ' • r . t/ ,•f r, •• b'• a. •t , ' _ �3'•' tit '• '' F •• � -.w,••e.� I t •� 1'h. •, .sh# r .i•• • . - `a' • a 1 •• .� '. .t. i.. . ;• - '.. r•' - , a� �q.{,," ./; ••,/, ,aa; ``f f. :^+ a,1 •� '. •,r_ •.. i�'9► t. � , ,1 ti✓rl'��1 . • � • `A: iw�. ♦ '•• r . •+••►4� e 1 ♦ _ .'i r.• ` i �. � ••r .•-! _•iM r. '1 >!w'11•`r' a •W rw.0 •!.• . �.� _y, `'�'-p--••,,N ,a !�„•. v �. 3 �. I•.t ��ri, 7• •t' f! ` .. _ , .y , .� •• ' ' {• .,�: !.. '.}, a •/-,, r ../ ' �,�� '•-„ ,•r •! a ` ' • •• `i' 7. M •' " ..t .�' ' ,r . . e > ♦ . S y 0 • • 't a r W �� • L •J. • ,,,.T +•' 't . •�• • n J Y' - I + t 1 ; ' • ' .A -I r '"'! � Y; ~r- wt, of, R�a,r i116At-.�'(j .! .tom s :. '` nw.r1. _ . .,s . l.Jia". •r �' �•- a ••r•• 'f • .•• �.-.`ir 'J ' .a • ' c. ' ' i 'i • �.., j 'Y -- (moi i • • > i. ` 7 �••`.•i {A' �f r•�. •�'_' i la�,J..• ��` %!�}y\,Ila •''d; -t,, C�`F"R �,t•r '♦til (r• ` - ..M' �. ��.. •'�.'♦ .Y';'. %,1 If.'tl �_ •-Y 's ` • ''• , •i , ( �•. .-' F�. t � • J �I •�••• t• 4; tYr :.♦ r •I , 'a,'. ♦ y 'i• r' , 1 Y' _ 1 .�.. j Y' • ►•, !Y ► t , i �-' �I i ! 1 • F a. 1• K4.� t�. �1✓t�'� .r � �d• r i L, , i" - :j .7F� e'-�• •► J� T: G •1 +f t ♦` • 4� .a �' .f�,:.'± a' .%:,''• ► '•' i ♦' �`' k t ♦ } A �o , ..-•�a.. ffti, .+ j;a1•,! ...' Sr ^i 1.-, �,•� y►�-1 ► a•r 'r� T -t t•• :�'.� 1'1 `.. ,'�'•j' ♦!`� { '•fi.. '♦ �'t-' �� , . .1 + 3 3 •' :S. '• 1- *';• ♦.,1 - '�. .t mi • _ -'iv•• .11. .til 'f I '..i".' v, , a.''1�•,f 1.� '`"r, -'1 lla j•;„✓• � �..� �i'•4• - IV J.., r•' , ; . , '� .♦,' ., '• �.J :.... W .• �• •1 , - I !` �/Q -j -� i! l ,,� ..., l { , . ,♦ A. ±- a. i 9 .♦ '�.�.. (� •. ' ! i t ... r j +yl�w •r i�,..�Nw..q y}{+..'.waG. •r• . -. .r. ........• - ' Irf ' ,1,Y > ,\ it ;f:. j `r ^ fid ' „'' .� •,_. •� j;.w-10.♦ y,p'�_ '. a •I I � JY, •� .(a •t'. 1 r �' \1'+��-'_- - i t' 5 ,'11- a ♦ ''S, t �' • •« +'._ ''ti. T is lr i .1► •I . '40 ''�'�M r • a '. r : • ( .� '..'3' �.Y•}*' • dy}'• ,. ar ` S� 4, . r •f a rte. /. .,+ • •7• w - IN VV. 41 i. �/i... �r r1'. R. G• Y g I:�'� • R^`tI� -v •yam J',1 } T..: ',~ .. .Z k �+ •,`• -03 j p • ► t,ljr,�' r :. rK` .ra A .. C .l ,'y t�:,w, i• t ar' ''. 3 •t _ 1 r • • 11' a • :! j w T t }+a.'',3.,�y, �•'r-r.irr., {., '• ..fir r .JZ�•j `.+Jt•�r♦►�.•3• j } ",t..l ►: r .i is ".,",�5, w.j':i /'I I }y'Y+ ��.. �..z 'MV- 3.•• v�`'rt �•''/ •♦ .'�rr• •�''. .� •l• ��:ry•�r •.• ri a. f r _ -!•.. •+tf.a, :•7 ' :r c? y q4 Yji': '�j+y4 s. 4•►'. �7l/'�r't�,ti• y ,� r.1••! ,1 �►.. • r.: c� 1 t i •,s . •,w •• L + •!? !+�:a•r t� .r r,' + 1�.x:�t,51,. y ' '�1 jt4., t.• b •� • i•'/1 .a t :i •�. y. 4 4i , �.N Y J' `►t�• �`' �J ~ ! L. R •• a '}� 1i':' ,..+ l �}{►•'w•.` %�,. ' •i, w •/ •y '.,,.F.i . y h 't�t T�,r` •� t '. d, �.� 'r • t t • •r ;:. f ? • ~'. - 4 - .• 1,� y�' +� J ' ., • , • , �, c . v. 1, 1 r 4� '. �a.�J�� , `• •f � • ' �','�••�.f� J �•J•k•� _ri; •V • •'s t,•. ,� • •. J , • ' . . , • i i i' '_ t ' •" r , t .. ! of - .'!;`!`M�. 1: j!!t,, �� ft'%"'.:"-?N''�i.�,,t 1.. � � '"'; 1rM .. i' �a'7`. j^= ••fl! .i . ..'y'ti.•♦ryf � .� ,.•• y -s ' f•.• • 41. -moi: / .:• •» �, • ' '� ' ;t`'r„ �•^.- i -'(a . ? '`•. T, L `►'r• �;i: _ f �,y'aj•. �' jr.�Y •';, r : .t.,�r , • . ry�M'... ' �1.S� i JC�.i' �r� •• �M} �,• r .l'V� 'f'' y'Yi'� �. r' •+t ,, t i r'• '. • S. . j• y .�' v.X•_ 'r tY `VS :s ''� .. •- t.ri. I "t :�• ►, • „ .• a+�. rt • • 4 ti, " �F - ,� , O , ... - •fir �j�t ` d , ,� .cu. , . 1 s iii f :.'l. 1Ot .4 'St 'r. �,r 4 e.� ') �t�.�,,� . f�•.t i•�'Y .f• 1i •».P :t .....�' R�K �4; J�'n� ��.f !� �' r} �t'� W . �'�[ •. •_(« \ f••K r.�. -i• ' -a• �: • I�' "� �Y•.:. �...j 'k i • •r }/ .�� »•�'S - �i ;�",M�'�r' ' ,»►•i.-.trr.�sA••..w!•••' to i .2 i • f! i- i •.v. }., r i , �' t/;..- r ;., ,J,� , ,� >rd, ,7. :l' �•t i 1►•'1 1f1 .•C �'! _ _ ♦q1` i' - . •r• _. - '.j- • _ • ,.1. ' 'Kq.. �. ' �at•.•'s•.�.��:r� •t,'G �t''�+�jt.� t'i .�'+ A �.'.'' r� i1 T.. 3 y r » J, -r ��Y �'�•�_. . f ',�./t• •�� ♦ - •:3 r � :•� y► .i' .'t 'I'r`��t� 'r'.. w. �z' 11 , •s +.. • ..I • .,• 1 t ' �.,i ttliaf'j r r.r ft. ' a • ,,' t' .�T,. ,. •-l•�►L• ..•j, r^ , ' .. •' .'� ,, rw! y . r. ` -7 4 •` s .t'. r y ` i. . Ja' r S � f T• �/� t`� \I'-( • a�',F.•."}t S 1 �,,1 1 '.i._. 7•�►. t�. ,r • .i, .•.V' .aA ! • _ , .i •.. jj �: 3. •.at. '.�I. _ •r •/ • '��. "1.1�-ti f•%,.-0, , .r iR ,•.r.'tr?"YiY{,�j�►! '!> ,}.� �•'♦:S' .� .- .� •:1jr• .R,: `'` - � 'y' .�,.It '�. :~ , .y ec .xa, •�'• .,n �'Y ,.�,: '� )• a. •.r.- .�►, •a ,a.• f i, H i. ' a• 1-i. -t'•` i . ;• u • I. •,. r - �. A,-� I` ' a•'r ` r � , •.•►k '!i.. �rt°••R Jy •Sz ,� .t, "f �`� ,'I J _ I,S frdt• • , $. r _!�'�. .�'. •3, -� �, L :.: .0 , ...� t y •» 1� �. • ! r . • •So . . : �,:.+ •'3l `,P:'.. / .J , .1 ,• w j•. t $`t •. :rr:• .a,. � ,k!.�•.: r r :r. -f r. . ~ .. .• ..t } .•,, t • •�►• i ..� ~ S •S ...Z'� '. • 1 ? a f :� u ' ' ,A� ' '! L -•:.• , ' , r . • " t .. i :� .•.:•. ., rt:". , I.• � � , '1' ,- J`�•//(� •' 1'• - .. ` •-• iy •'` 7, _ "�%• f`• •••• ,..' "�� '�: i r• 11~ .�• ;. •. f ► +' ! r�.. � I•. j I. O' !t y .... . • .*�'•-M; .••••`1M,'tr�.�!~••/�'. ,•!' M.'F;i'•' •t �.�, ,,f f='':.'J•rf •* a�fii!' vi :♦!yi '•f'tY•• 'I "r� .•,%. ! •{�.'• ♦ :'C ;�•� • 1•' , . •`�• 7 �• yi'-• 'f �.. ,� �`•>',(•3 •t vim.' -r �� . •` •. O ••:-A,W-f{.',W •- i',-' •it.3+y��'�y'• ''; �r �' ' y -x i• 1: `i. r a ► �'~ '� I. ` il. X 7i _i .-•�ji.' �•� �� dry}I.if�+�" ,1.r'.v. • r' '"w i f •p`.~'�'♦.•�'.J JS'�1• ..+�J ..*'' ��K.a,. •�,�••.:ti�' ,- '+it ` . +Y * •.•.►' '+A r�,rSi. tit'y���, • ' i 'ta f ...• .1 ✓r .. '%i ..�., t/ ".•S' •NSM `P -'•. ✓' d -i l •••R.'- •'/ ♦ r +t I •i� it '• J �..'d r ,1. , :f?' v y '.♦+�.�: :� '�: ► r + , • . j.''t•/rl••;j • •n - r� •!, -/ tka a,..' •7■ !• r• rr.40o 7t; t w r .. , i w . e , :a . . ..� +�f. .as3=' 1' �•Z• f�• • •1Ar. -A, �.'•.� ",� ,L •,�• �. •r••�(� x•1'11:.%* C '•'i•• `%,' �,-• .� .._ �• IL J 7�• . '�. :4 y, - .1 �L . �v i _ ',` 7 �• j �•'C, r �• r �.`-i `,s. !•` y, i•, f.,*, - *. � V,4 �J- �l'1v '4 %'�T".1 1t.�.IPc •f`�,'�� {�'W » !i� '��. -A f-. �•1".� �� 4� ` r' � � . 7�Nr ♦ L• •� '♦t_.+J ',+i .+t _a_• ,�t. I• /Ij>. ••jv • - .\.� ♦ .-fr ♦ i • •. ;._`j.y,.rt.,� J•rjr ` r, } .«a ;1��,;If,v7�� !�- •� 'f}'� �`{�'y. ^ J.'•'�'•1ZS� •f{•ti ��+.f,a"'r'•: f�V •l, t� •{ J ♦_�i1'P ;.. +., .2' ' :'1i a. ;�� ! ,' it M "` ; ��' k •' - • .� IW '�• • f'Y .:�y." �s•- 4 s+� ri.•. .";ql ♦ . •�'�i 3'��' ��! +.1 0r 1a 1 •a: .�:!•J_; yI- I.� - �' "a ♦, f, -'/,'X'- .� r"' •• r 1. .r• t1+ !�w.• _O' tt- '.•1 a~'^ /� fir. %�• t' S• •r .:ts.�`"'..�' ..� :�J rA-O` _, ' . .�/•S71r;_� L +r,4f .a}$••►M•'♦ .. _ 'IK.y';•�•� •Ij`f 7r�e •rl •.�-'Ii.d r. f• _ Ijr�f }.�'•t �,;y'+, I, R1. -"" .T .w:,�vt r'ile ;K - 4Y •�•^••�•�r'••a a,• '{r-,j��• n► '�.. ,; •r •. '1_ 1. R ` s r j•' J • 4 fir' � + • - ? A 77��3 1 7!: .rG y k f • �'�+ { �. ' t ' 1►�.. ( T t / rte• � ,.ViN j'i �•x T - j.* ••� - y :t l��./�' t '.i� t3,''. • t .,' fr' .•JF••s.�t•.'A - ;� K ;:!i. -' !� f i'Y ;•tea lJl. s' •r i 'r .v -i �a,i , M• �`i : } ',� •f -•tjfi' .�. J' y . J. d . � f. , i 1yj .j -i ♦�' ,, • • '•� ) r k ,,.,.:,, 01 fir.' 7; 1 *. + . •�. f - 7'. .• . +j. •C. , -f.. • � • ' w.•' 4. �•+. 1 . >.. , �, : r ."� . yet' r •{'`(L �J! 1�' 16. ­# «tt. Zi w• .p • r, W +j.1 * ;, .t �` ' • •; 'Y • ±... ��rrr ! t ♦ t : . ! tt' Tq • `a • ' r r ii ^t •� • a y � y + t . fk L . C -y' I 1 ' ,. .j' ' 'f' J r , r `� 1 i •� t 1 - - v,,. • i .. j ♦ .• w 'f r . rl j T • 7 .. •• . 'i . .l �� ..- 1 ..►» art'► ♦- • •, • t .C� % 1. ... 77 .. t1'.r..: M1) \ • ^ % a.' •r • " +i•'•'• - • ' ,j : r L,_ r t, !• '1, . .y- A i • _ ..�. • -a �T • +f /�►• . r� • • . -T♦ . ''t . ♦Y • ' rZ el 'If •i. 1 f _r .°=' '. N4.+� ♦r i R,-�. !' Z / a 't • • a <7" - �, r,__ . I. j 7/a; i .'i . I LO I'l , 1��. . tr r rf • • . -,'' 1, t^ Joe P.. �� . 1:1 V . .- '­­ �F i -, 0 - ''�:_s..• +!.. -• ..:r a•. ... ?• • �• ..'`f .• :-t, a, !: 1't 1.-� , '^., ! .%• "!♦ a•f t" • . .. ♦ %r • , 0- t !• . . 11 a,%(.- ,- , • -` 'yt " •' -i. .1 / .t ".� • r • yf. I. i, -r'•_` + _ �,. ",, •a '1 r' ` • r . , ► . '►I A- .ey '�S1 u L..i ' 1. rt.r. - •r �• e 1. _ tar �,• ,;t fM,y� r '•/t ' t :• , .1 i „ - . , . . .. %N6 .. v A, . . I . . . - I $6I .. .. ..P # :. r • . it st ..r � • . . - .. 5 i ' ,r.* • , . • • . . , ` .. • a . �' .' „f , • .,•►r»•Htw}.�,,�-.rV,A uM. • r.,Ity,1t�,•C _4;A tV .j%o.r•M'rAi. I`I','•� . •`.~"1MI '�%rw .. - • - 7". • r . !1' 6 'r�i✓•.r.N'V� ne„ ir•"'• . . , ' : , } ... - . ` _ 1. * .- . P. ;::� . I - I .;- , I . . I . . I . . % . . - . . . . �, - , , , I . A . . : x . I . . I . . I . . . . .. , . . . . . . . . I . •` `' .. , yrs • • • r /_ i•,. -.M • . - . . * .t r { .J ^r • 1 3 t , t r. a • I i _ :s :' :4. f. : ' ��) •t,�,; _i -Y •- t; t~•�'; -A?`. -ti . •.r'. ., '%, ';r •�r 'J+tf�f ti` r! ,• • •s tiM i "•ti' •!'ti a.;r"YI i'►;.i h ; ' i+ ,1 • a jL, .a f'j, .. . f 1 'J' 1 -•1't 1 3-! e.' ka. •r .• . 0. •( r t . a ' a • + r ' , •' • , • • ,a.. -,%$,.•\I T . ,. r p 7 • � 1 i /.. '(,,..., I•• .ie . ^I. .. a�• .' -r. a, • .3. % r _ !a•. ''�. -.< ir-�,. _ •- a.�. 4.,.r ` yK.�`i, r' aafi i- - -K _ _ ♦ • .". J - ' a I • •r• tr..1 I •�' . . ! 4: . r 'f, . Y j , ' ' •L 3 0. R� `•r.� r�''` ��^ . Yr.�a�.+G'�`. r ,Sir' :•. f 11 l�'y«..'• •• , 1 'y. %. lS ��! : I1.+� �,'jc �•r :w iil (i - .+a, -.r - .,.4' r . •tr Y . � ' +' . •�•' sa,,�M. y' �i. y,X a ,.,a• .1' •''i. . -1•J; - y� . . !.•.t .. ..•,'. . . / . .%-''... , r..e.•I•r;,;,I,': -' . . . I w .► '!!'/ ••, )• �'`.,,lr" 'x`.14 !`.� _ 4 t�•��'� . • •' r,`. •�{� ' 1�/� . O• -A ,/fes• •� • >� •.S, , .,�'M Y 33 7 r.+ fr'-'-{. e"-t; A`. N,7•. •)•/'. l .•:, 'I, ,'/; �"c'�a I• •. J1'• '�•' .If . I. 7 i 'I.. ,._ , , ' •f* .r ♦ i.' _ '• - '.iG,v�• 1'e'. a , .J,.. 4 •h.•'.'' �To" v >.. } • ' . rf'. . �. O.,...�i..Yy .1%1'j.1w l.':ti • .' a j_ . - •i ..'}. -- r��V+' f; . x"r• j' .0 "s '".. . •S• T..Ka . te..♦ %• , 1 .1 . .a t �� A 'I,i }.• .'� +.• ' ��•. S;r•.r r.'► �/t•' , ?. .f! ,� �.-' �.;, i"'f 't .j..�� .r„ ,";•�*r> IL �f, • •' f � .r,a .o >,. L� e' � • ;* �' . '`� i••F�i` '%a,i(•�• i � t!�'�-'•-•�+'a"""•"^• r: .' � ,i r r�le At r - i' + • -• • it • i'�••i. •J� ,•� /•�' .i ' w„�.+.wiJ�YtM••'. •♦► .. 1 - -•t{. r ;fr, 1 t ' J + 1 -• •; `~• l ' .a , �, t•ti,' T .. �, _ 1 J� _ ✓ + i .n r .. -_ . J ,•, :�� it ,• _' .. �'�� • •r.•.'1�t •+r't� ••t'.'• -•ti � '�'� •\+moi � 1>'�e ;'~ :� r \.. ?v!': r,�, •' ;try• , i' •�. .�,- •• •,• '. r 1' r. {'�. .i � • �• ✓F! .. � •s aA ,•-a, ?•��'.' .' •�• ,,. t ..� ' ) '- � � .. -"'1� .• '� 1 `./ + r • ''- �, ''•i t .`;,�. •�' 4• ' 3� '• '�7 '`. .,. •'.. I,r a J � . •:t t. '�. •�� ,i-'} �• ' �'*' • •! r\' ,� . •, � A ,r�.l: �j�`( �.. 7 .i•�• r. ` f� ., ♦ f t 4•' I,i•- 'i, ',, '. _ � J1•a~1•� ..a •�' r r'1,� •-! %It 'i►• .� �.• r• a; � , .� ,,''•` • a � � .�. _ .- • .. ,� �'' '• t t .�•• '.�.:ly .. !s..�;t ..- '. • •• � '�'�'+L� - .i 4 • � � � �. •j , •t : `'4i• J'\.: ' J 1 •' . y� �••p '•t - •i '•'�`4 ... • w, _ It•�, ••, I j 1'� .' .\"� �•S' a. .• 1� ,.�'tC •,•fit, �/yt�`. ._ ,�, � • a f. ! �* j t. �� '�I • r • J r +• . '•'r�� a t • 4.,• w : 7, ( ,•7, f • r i • f ',•.: I/ • •�I r f .< i %i. ; ; ♦F."t. >• , r Z.+ f + r . `� `•s. . , i� ,••�, .i �' l t`a. Y , Y .R ♦ a j ., a . •+��.• . f 1 >•t. ,,. '1\ r, 1';' i.' a�,L• fi • :� ! ;. •gyp \ 4, S )J1 - •(.� 'I �r .'� - S+ t! , ';1 }'.ati •'• ': �•I, !t �[`' - ,f i i -� «• -! )•; ;� ,t .�• r{'Ii •ri t, 1 �' / r. .' t • t• \ j ` f' :.•1 �. ` . ti . T. ' • • K 41 'y t. t tk� r �.ra, • ,�• •% k t ._ -Y �.'w•'-, t • .' -_r •' 1 •`\ �! �' t , t • ...fir. 1 ,r• . • , y r t •• �••• t f!' f •' I, M 11 'Ai.ilt^ a .�. +�Y • . �j ► i! �; '� • r, • •� Ft ;' t •t. �d/Y'• zi .IJ* •t. � 'l �,, ', ` %� ♦ ♦ �] •� , .•' }', :^'�- .i a l,'i .. F. � 1•. +.� ' r I •r � � �' ••• �+• •� � • `` it is , •' wti r M, a! t . it. i.. ..�, ! , �. �•. �- .. .,irt• i • j• ••' f /C r {,' `i, 1y t -f. x �L ►' S• .. ''� t , '� i *' .11 �� •,� a v .. �.� `.d �i,• • r. , �: s 1'M'� r ~ • r it 4 t' 1 - .. i • '. : Y 1 i�li''� ►�' i •.r` .P t.t �"Si' �� ••') ♦` ••`r ••., ' �� f �...\ r� / \• 'i `. '� h. t ' • /! �� ✓ .. �,/�, '� +•�_ Ly,rt.•j ,,. •• .� •,� �� -.�\ ��� ■1 •at ,.-' l ^ t ••, •�- TL:'ti 'zi13.r� •i •a • yz t l� ' a.. t / •'� a' «• ♦ ( 'T y • �• , r ♦. ' _ �,j c r , t ,� ,,: i v-1 _ •c ( '; -r r•t.} ,tik1 ♦,.rj'�'•n t i'.fr•.:`,�'• `�: ,»1. t' •;;..t;},-! ' �1-+ f2'• 2• •� •.•f, %;; w+f/rir_ .. •y -di *' .r~.: , •+- i „ 48 't �+tti4 p.a .i• .`�>'',' 0` ;� ,.{C_4jr ` i • ; yi1.r .r: •t �� i��� `l. is At . > 1{•, r:t• 1r} �y •�' •, it t .- -t ,.• _ .� :, +r.• i' _ `� . 1 S' ,fit •�'' ' 7 '. >� ��J}}tr =•� •' �i �: t .. / `•�l ,;•.T / i;•�• y, ,1 •`� ,'••} .' -16 + .��`�' 1../. M ) j .i , . • t f r r !� t• •': � ` . a/�.IMI♦ I rr. •`� , • T•' a,�. •� r •1 +- �'•j. •'t•` '"�• _ '•� 'r• • •� + 1• -C �, • iwR'{•9•- �.a. •.i �• y•f • �� . �. ,,j • .fr f .��������`fti�• .J "l •. + - t .t I� .-tea'-If 'y' i�• .�a► r i. • , 1 �.j,' r,t'• t. a,• •„t .-♦ j .r�„ j �, •C�. a 'f rl•� r. - \ r: i ' Y<- .t'• \a•_tyi, ,l _ •S' �..• _ ► •t a, '•'r t•• 1 ' .. -'I . • .. ! + •,�1 ,t •� :•�, y A ••'• �. i. ,. •- . ' '�� �.' �.T 1 -•• •r�.•t r. _i .,. ' . '� 1'• -Y• y .�- '.v: '� I'*•• -4 �••t �i•�,t�+• ..1i •.. �i. C,'a ,jr �, �i '1- A, I�► 'v d 'l.r.al �..hi 1 ..� ♦•, atl�' . +t �r jI� • • ,.. t i -!f. •�( ► .t• •,. 'r�l.,-. r i .a«., .• , • 16- i�• % f •a 1 ' If .:: ��.4 .s n. .•Cr.. i"'fr �,.4 -► • r. •( / .� •ir •r r .''1 {-1 . .�• y r�1 •��'\ •' ` t. j• .,' .,t., t• \•:r r t .`' r-'►�' r , �Yt r' f' 11 f7�w• .•:1 I ' r % •r' ., .l • ' I` i y• t•i y.I • 't - , • J� ... .•�\ 'r '[ }• w .r tt ` { _. `,, `� .• ..L ` wa / ' •.•'' f •.• '{ J••' �. i'J - l'. IT"'' `•' M t i" ••► • f 71 j •• r t �• f j f� 'i i�� %L •r Y t i t • \y ' ' • � '• '� - � 1•.1( K��� Fes^ � IL • ��' Iii • •- ♦ I.I. � '• • , • f `r •F • • a • r i. `04•�.1; �",s .�}"�! w .ti T'.:1 i t• 1 j , �1Y • !: -. •* •rte; ` .• y'•�-�1 t .. :.0 ;,. - , � •,J /+ - w, ` t -.•r•J #•�•+ .' 1'•'� ; �"' . i .i •� J�. - •• .. ,n t .. y y� Olt • � r r • s � . h �• MRS yT • Y �,� .l r' �{:.. tii[1 •'! • Y.y,. _` '•�. w. fi• - .J a .l, .. ♦ ;•, •' •� � ', . � � •.. 1 ~ _} � '} .} � r. w i .. .•�.►• ••Y r . t KI; fAl WOO' -'fir - f f, :}.,- - • • '\ Ole 07. 7N\ L • r 10 4 JOINT MEE'T'ING ST PAUL BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS AND CITY OF MAPLEWOOD February 23, 1988 Attending: Rep. Sarna Rep. Morrison Rep. Price Rep. Valento Tom Mogren,. Board of Water Commissioners, S t . Paul Delah Bochroch, V -P Board of Water Commissioners, St. Paul Michael McGuire, Maplewood City Manager Kenneth Haider, Maplewood Public Works Director Jacquelyn Benjamin, Maplewood Neighbor Carolyn Peterson, Maplewood Neighbor John C. Greavu, Maplewood Mayor Jerome Segal, City of St. Paul, Asst. City Attorney Mac Meade, Maplewood Review Norman Anderson, Maplewood Councilmember Julian Empson, Urban and Local Affairs Committee Administrator Urszula Gryska, Secretary The meeting- began at -1:10 P.M. Reps. Sarna and Morrison made opening statements as to what they expected to accomplish and why the meeting was called. Mike McGuire handed out a handout which is enclosed. Mr. McGuire explained that the Water Treatment Plant had been in the same location for many years and that it was about three years ago that neighborhood complaints and concerns started to be raised. Approximately one year ago, in January 1987, that the situation became intolerable in the words of the neighbors and it was suggested that the city of Maplewood get involved in the solution of the problem and improve the conditions and address the concerns of neighbors. In April of 1987 there was a neighborhood meeting with some of the Maplewood officials and out of that meeting carne a list of concerns and damages from the residents, contents listed in handout. At that meeting it was decided that there should be a meeting with the representatives of the Water Board and the meeting was held on August 5, 1987, results of meeting are in the handout. Petition was presented to the City Council requesting that the Council initiate special legislation that would give suburban representation on the Water Board, also a decision was made that there should be a joint meeting with the Water Board and the Maplewood City Council and State Representatives and Senators* Agenda of the meeting is in the handout . and the attendance is also included. At that time the idea of legislation was discussed and later pursued. There was also an ordinance that was developed through those meetings, Ordinance No. 619. Maplewood is willing to compromise to something short of representation as long as they can resolve their problems, would like an advisory board to address the concerns of the neighborhood. The complaints have been coming to Maplewood for three years. They realize that not all of the problems can be resolved right away but they would like to resolve the problems with the hauling and the dust. St Paul Board of Water Commissioners presented their side of the issue. Felt Board is not unresponsive. to the residence. The two groups were having problems before with negotiating to reach a satisfactory contract. Legislation was initiated at that time to get suburban representation on the Board. Explained that the current contract is a retail contract with the city of Maplewood. Issue of contract never resolved. Negotiations have resumed on the contract issue. It was agreed by both parties that the contract issue was a separate one and not the focus of this mee ting . Water Board took the concerns of the residents that were presented to them, reviewed them and did what they could at that time to help to alleviate if possible, the concerns of the people. . The October meeting was helpful and informative. Disposal of the by-product is still being a problem and being studied to determine which is the best system to implement to remove the solids from the water. Under consideration is a system that would remove 90% . of the solids, which would reduce by 90% the amount of solids in the lagoon, which in turn.would reduce hauling by 90%. Deport done by a consultant is enclosed. Centrifuging would impact the lagoon by reducing the solids by 50% immediately. Water Commissioners were never informed that there were problems and dissatisfaction among the residents. Hauling is possible after the frost is out of the ground until the hauling is completed or until winter. Primary disposal is land spreading. There is. no increase in residential building in the area recently. After the meeting with neighbors, residents indicated that activity at' the plant increased. - The increase was explained as needed in order to remove the lime from the lagoon. Excavation -was being supervised by staff to ensure that the contractor conformed to the regulations'. Hauling was done on residential streets. An alternative is a street that is not considered to be residential. Centrifuges, if placed into operation would reduce the amount of hauling to about 8 trucks per day. It is possible to have centrifuging equipment operational by July of this year. Problem is finding a place to dump the lime that would be left. Stock ;piling is not allowed due to fear of damage to the land. Representation on Water Commission wzuld allow 'the residents to voice their concerns to the Board and hopefully would expedite the solution to the problems . St. Paul expressed concern. that representation by. Maplewood would invite a similar request from the other areas that the Water Commission services and felt that it would lead to conflict of interest concerns i.e. contrac t negotiations. St. Paul agreed to establish an advisory board. Both cities agreed to identify a person to act as a complaint officer. St. Paul will have an on site person and Maplewood will have one off site. There was a specification of what short range, mid range, and long range goals are. Short range are the hauling, contracting. Mid range are the centrifuge removal. Long range is the filtration process. March 9, 1988 was designated as a due date for a report outlining what St. Paul intends to do. The meeting was adjourned at 2:40 P. M. = RESOLUTION WHEREAS, St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners initiated a conditional use permit For material extraction and hauling at the following' -described property: The East 1/2. of the Northwest 1/4 lying East of the St. Paul Water Works and the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 lying South of the St. Paul Water Works, Section 189 Township 299 Range 22. And the North 130 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, and the North 270 feet of the East 442.68 Feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, Section 18, Township 299 Range 22. The North 900 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 lying West of Highway 10-62. A strip of'land 60 feet wide adjacent, parallel and to the east of the present right-of-way belonging to said Board of Water Commissioners lying in the Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 and in the Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 and in the North 1/2 of Southeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 187 Township 29, Range 22, and a strip of land 65 feet wide, adjacent, parallel, and to the east of the present right-of-way, lying in the South 1/2 of Southeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of said Section 18, Township 29, Range 22. A strip of land 100 feet wide over and across (from Northeasterly to the Southwesterly course) the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4, and the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/of Section 18, Township 29, Range 22, according to U.G. survey thereof. Being a strip of land 50 in width on each side of the conduit line as adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners of said City of Saint Paul. That part of County Road B from the West line of McMenemy to the East line of St. Paul Water Works right-of- way. And that part of Rosel awn Avenue from the West line of Highway 10-62 to the East line of Minneapolis -St. Paul Saulte Ste. Marie. That part of County Road B 800 feet East of Rice Street to 100 feet West of DeSoto Street, WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council held a public hearing to consider this revision on , 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present .t said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and Present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described conditional use permit be on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 15 1 The use is in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare. 3. The use would be located designed, maintained, and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental, or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference, or other nuisances. ° 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced *by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools, and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the city. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with Article X, material extraction and hauling ordinance. ' 2. Adherence to the site plans for dike construction and screening. 3a The top of any dike shall be at or below Elevation 895 MSL. 4. Dike construction shall' be accomplished starting on the north and proceeding southerly. 5. Installation of the screening shall begin before or concurrently with any other work. 16 6. Noise from any equipment, machines, or other activity is permitted from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. No noise is permitted on Saturday, Sunday, or legal holidays, 7. Dust shall be controlled on and off the site utilizing the following techniques or whatever other measure may be appropriate to avoid a nuisance: a. Sweep paved areas on and off site with a pick up type sweeper on a regular basis. b. Unpaved roads shall be oiled or treated with a wetting agent such as calcium chloride as needed to control dust c. Other dust control measures may be employed for specific activities. 8. Conduct a particulate monitoring program of long duration to establish background levels prior to commencing operations and continuing monitor throughout the time there is activity on the site. The results of this program will be made available for review on a regular basis. If specific questions arise concerning this program the utility, at their expense, will contract with an independent testing firm to verify results. 9. The utility shall engage an independent testing firm to conduct a vibration monitoring program. This program shall establish background vibration levels, recommend reasonable vibration standards based on accepted industry criteria, and monitor vibration during activities on the site to insure compliance. 10. The utility shall provide a contact person or persons that has the authority to resolve problems and is available to address citizen concerns. 11. All written material and plans submitted with the utility's application are part of the permit unless specifically altered by these conditions. 17 ���rcr ;�, 19^�' Advisor"�At at �+':�ter Ut ili ty i•- • :2• - ,i ,");"a: ..ar.. J:�c},.1� �e .Ln ;,,A= ra, C,Iarerc--� an!J I-iiry Oser, Fc.- terson, ion. Al, 3erer, itov-r h r o r t1r. Meeting started :-.ith st:-te.nant; cam' �K ACtat�:�1� ,;f ikdvisory bo -rd Tom iii.: The kur-.ose wits st;,te., ir. tl�e i4at�r i),;�,rd Resolution, t+� improve cation has to ha pan c? b;- + ho �� a ' p �� _ , �►n ti s �nitiatec3 .�,, V r L-)ar<<. beighbors carr exrr-ss their concerns, n"; be able t be irvc?vel it: the solvinof theseFroblems, Lr-,ar_ ing directly fro:a ;,he peor1e. %ir. Eller,3 has '..11th lietro Waste Gontrll Years at •• 3 t'.es�• tr'*.a t�:ert ��lr.rlt . IIn w��rk�-d with e e:auip .e rt, there is c tc our r.r ab, i -n- PLO- . z. Gurt:• B.: The lig ��•�l a U� �:�I: t 1k J o�` i• t J- ? 1<. = ,- t b^' t ��'�� . r,�- ,. Y I . by c4 r- _�t�r. of "rob�e.�:S is +,t�P r �N +•; .- ,T �1 t. bro.zd r �•..��, t..•t. apt iry v s the operation of stiff the.,i3laly� ��t c_.. Urnt they takA 1'1 11 frar tI: i s site nd br d r. ' t)a crk dirt in f}1p r:J t4.3. -La! o1' 1,,w r. i. rh t n,-': cii: } -,; e, .ate. lof nois4► . Ii: Oct . ivir , Moe rem r �z i:�. ru• . ti�}rr c�...l r. .,�, • t + C ..1� i a..V.. r ..l till- VIJ �:, anti hbors, hip•. :�i :►�;rer stig.� t�,:i that i��•at fr�':,� the zleiEhbovgood -here b -i Cori:ntirici: ti or f� * t%,Y!AP r, ':Dater Board a r.,- nt-.% hbors . If we resolve azT problems thrcu!-h this; Alvisor,,r C�:r.:.�.tte�► ii; lI our actior, b�% taker_ c^- fore thr,-. 'water Board kind kdo: ted: Ti,e P�:tr,-:-c;tior. ordinance carne out of the t• meetir. I hive cone^r2: •bout !P ttirs i r:t :tion ::r. t:1-., eater Board for ;�i�,:�,? W00 . T1i_: i;coF1A affected din �ct1J rlced a �t-�j.ce iri i.r:�ble:�1 solving. I see 3 areas whe---rc we need to word:: 1. A d v i s ry% C:a.. t' %e eXtraction :wrr haulin or;er- Qtian. 39 ne resentatlo:. Cf i•;a; le��*god ori 5 liy�i .��stPr hoard.e hive cair_ts o resideris w�lkinr - oi-� t1���et �,t:a �r�.r:: c; . r�;,; ; r.,�;'r'. ��:'' 11:::x! thrown at t;:c u fry: track -r�iee ls. Bylers: �.�:,5*:r�P fly uiir. ''>>T• �::- ;-'^�•il.A be id riot fly a1 •-J,.-• T^n :r V�LIr F-.& � t;^`d•r -.2�' �•�t �•.1 �/'../ �t .�1 � /�. 1. iii a r \ • zr u'1 .'^. .i t :.�, .•;<�ra ��� _+.►�-r � r.,. :�t }_ f• :. �� r;�� tr .,:ks t^ store I would n :t ham: Y _..�1. �: t�• �:i J ;�i'i�ra7 ' 1' .' �1•�• -.. ',.%- I I "'.: & to C!�3_ '•♦ • � t 'rl� \ ' � 1.. J j •_ t. c^•4�;itt/_� 1s ar. hor.�-�t uff" rt t-: .:^t.t1� ��e thii •� :Ir•� •• �. ilt..: ^ �� T;'1i 2' �.'•!'� ��1Jr. u�• .~ti,� .. • i.1i v .Ll'.. `~.i��. ? .�.. ��! �Zn•n • C ,l v l�;•i i� �. ast, year w s i �C'o ti.,,cyS ��.. T' e• �. .► C Yea • .�t'iv. • • 1 J .Sy .•.a i. ���. /,� �• �� ��i V �{►:/� J• 1 `•�. :� �rl� V L - r t , •-1 ,• , - �., �•, j �, 1 ( • . ; • , ,...•�- 1 , ; , L • ,., • • ,.'. i j•• \j f J, `j t 1 , A r .L - r T . �y ..� . 1 1 i .� ►� :/iL. ✓ !� •. t- ♦t1 �✓ `. ...J 1d J i --A . _.t„ r c. a : C' n a. • _ C jj C 1. t' 1 Cs f ' - J ;_� ''''. L �r:r• ii: �I';;; t? I .� V- *1Axji:.er o1 4rno.ks ii�aulir � _:••�t �_ ;,�ie l �o:�r r Lie♦ st :.f' ..;�.�t r;,3 lore :� 'I' _)':. U�'f'}1 t^r; . ;,'�Z :t,,.1 .1r�;. r . GTiir•V: 'rhi8 !•ldv!jDr. �r l:._�'i n �G, 11iit�l. d t'Z.�I i J. ,r t��e '^4�'• t�5 t `�_.••� �' �r :�•1 Ara „- L _ 1'� ra ♦ '� l , ' • \ � �% J �! r v _ •.. ?••! � � .L � �� � t ,tai. � � . ► •: � t • r J + wa �. � 1 1 .. l ! � , 1 � .` l � ` Y • � 1 0l welt.Lt ,w'_1en i I U,; Lo. ►A L1 .. V�•,.I'C� .:�:t,::I k:tili tr •1L•, �� Cc' .• .1 , a. .• . ♦. v .: 1�'r, I e • O'd Gt. v � 1 Wj t,, +, n , .nis yam• `l,.,i,,.�,. J r.,.E-1,t. ��zr 'C.e;t.b�l .Y' _._� �,e t,,,•� �” nad'c1 bokri? . It .11C- that 1 4111 b�. :,:::�e -� to serve for I - m tr . Tom An.: At the r.:etine FehrurrTr 3 ;lith, meM�t,F-i• �,+ c_�..:._�.t tee of H:;•_l;f., �f. P/�r:1•.�... sentatives that c :1 .t-0 f',.':• tl:^ rtili to do 3 things as a foorl stek:� to trry to re- s�lve the ;rob C r::} -81, r ��r r: a dvi s r:r�f Co.' i1:i t to e , • :::� thu Ater Board set s uI . its .newt �!••ct1.r �n ?-2�, 'I lio i ; t�_ im, r Cyt-: corainuric:�ti or_ and t� #'or•. r: for dis- ubsi -,, ":2, Utilit-r t.-) riatre C, I-erson to w''. co:m,laints c��u.ld ..be addre sse . l�,r, l�ohror i.s sub„ itteJ L:s tvhe . person to cal 1. I! hL, t44. r. ronsibility that neighbor's concerns be 3. �.ater Board t-- s ubluit a brief :summarj of what steps and acts ons the -,r w.)u ld fore s:•(% ir_ th snort, mcg I111AT, nd lent` ter:r., we have sublritted Vd s to ;,:1cc-t cr:.�unit,tee of t;�:* 1cgi:�lature, ar:i the infor::l&t1-�r. is ging out to Maplewood • The legi sac ture is u ttempti rv• to Cet us to :Dave our j ro a— le�.s rega-'aved. Thi- is rc�od begirniiz. G�.r,,- ir:,?icy to :I tI<<�: t Maplewood h�,s no �.r_- tenticr �f shuttir.L d:;.::; the water utilit f If tr:r p-ople, do not believe this is suffi_Ci�T.t, wo% it ulc9 like t` hear thAir i,de s. Ian: optimistic, 'age 2 Yx3 r ch c, 1988 Ad vi s pry G o^Imi t tm e r e a t i r Garr: If you can re s ulve problems with this Advisory Board tha t is fi ne . I would hope you w�Juld use t�Zis comr,�i ttee to air,lans so when t;ae permit comes up b-foro the City Council the residents will already be aware of tho► Flan. Ci tizer5 would also be ar'vi sons to City Council. Torn: we are, committed to eget it resolved. (handout was passed around titlea Mitigation Of Lai ���r �l .r�. tiorwl Feeble:, ,;P Lre rot coir -f, to ask for a vote on theve i roposa.ls , and it is not an all-inclusive list. Fare 1 I. B. Long. rile:::: we will con ti rLcl to wrest we t4r t11is year. I. 5crA4erir_ * could t y ein artificial barrier, vrood^r like alonrf fzratewa-r, or some other t;�� o�' r .t�.��r r:l� rtir:�-, lik, trent: tD f ,,,, bcrri^ i, ,, si-� t :.� . � o �_ . r fo �ur.d a. d _ �. . Carc,lyr, F. The. re c- ?lbor; have Mint and di�.c„ .�a3this,ax's �rrp• t,_� t d Iii♦ J w .� ►i A ._ •.. . V not want r w X11. We►�rou.Id 11.1e berm ;lith roes of �vQr r,� ,l -is sty:--.;YPre :1 to blo-'c out the sit^ from view of r ,r �iomAs - Torn: we would have to plan it so theses w.:)uld rot Ze cuaraina� e �,rcble� • �P w:;"? c have to do a stud. -,T Prd look at it soon. On the scuth side, of the large lagoon tiler± f s lV.ck of ~race, arki not much, room for a berT.::reF I w )ndp.r if the resi-lkerts would want the * ..rm �n the it tan 44 . Clarence 0. I believe they want it or. vo 'r 1w nd. Tole.: 'e -.t.��- to f ►.11 cut ir_t l.l;e la- cor, : re -a F,nf' iocz t- Dur line further noxttY -.ir.,' bt,i .. • • •� r 1 �.`� �; u �rays. {�crE_cni nL o� mac: is..�.:.. �r Ro�c,1a•�r.. 1i: 4 Z. Screcr-I- - ,r. ci�:r.- �',til�' ��'17.:VP*r _. hom T.%il�• `�` •!'�'41d •i��%., 1J CJ j: .Ltr►i1 _.i^�, ,J11�rf� ��cC�r Z� J.'iJ t`J �1.1 �� Lr'J��j�l' ♦il!r� t1,- •1x'71 I'• ��^i��? rati•�� tc be fore fir,• coi�trac .1:: w,�uic' ?:i'.vr% to award a c: ntr$ct. I w�u 3 like to -. r A.- �� �'�, +�c►n►t !`• = -'�R O 3• C C c r ���� �.���1�►1� f�� will -U L^ :'Il\ ti V �•i1.,�, �_, 'r, �/ ser _ \. n.... f.fo t s a ,,. �.� <• • CA t•* f -)rA .:+,-. r "' t 1'E.Ct-;�- r, r� + �r c.2: '-TZ • T : r;c :� �'i `� }._j. � r �; ,i��� o v:3ci B r n � r1rt�r•- ��.:�•% .� for t' c:r ra yr. T so:�r r s bot ��.r. T. iii?. t C R . �, :• .� . J r n' 1`..l: I1hd t ^iii: ::� �� ufl •j.. �.�.� It mr re ji nu s�.l`.� � ►�� `til V _-.'1G J�Ci_ h1t� l" 1 �. • • 3, .2.. Cie r.tr ifu ,& i r L•r Hca l . dc will continue to water, but reduce t1;e 1VL'Iu.•11;e of rr: t ir to lagoors, redt,ce tho r.Pe:? for httulinr; it away. I . �;; Iei•s mei:tics::�� t::� l�.r., ��� hatiTe r:c., \�.�i ll cull for exc uvetir.r; �'ra. out of areas 4 — 6,000 lott:cis. In tg 7 we haulid 7,C'00 loads OUt of there., w'e do r -)t };� tf� all. :�f t1,e data •,rc; r.�ed to r�.d.:cie the 1 alilii-,�; 1jr-,l )1,�,� 4,000 lo::.:::,. Centel_ fuge .gill. reduce the volixTie . suf'f'icientlt to allow us to o oelow t* ��,C�C}C! 1.o�d until we hava that System runnin- . Nor= C-►uld it be hauled out by train? Tom:' we are workir: • on sites for ru es ivi r� this material `:h s c lly c�.F t►.zr . rig 1-0 uhlo- ding it. It is used -to increase the phof soil gar:A in land. fills to help LZ, -,rove sail, thn-,r mix it xtiith solid waste. de. will use all Foo-sible opti oris �: r.d -ref nir. ze use. of lagoons by year round hauling with ee.� ntrifu� e . We nerd to find disposal situ ani' :►ox•k �.rf th stste agencies, t �h, State nealth, to rte t spot to put it into more. of land fill ope, rh V iyil. ;ail would have th have site near tract- s to unload. 1x'. Lirle rs: east Control has a :nen in Lorth i��kota who takes sludge a►4a;,r for e ,• , r pre cio .. 3 ��•�rch 9, 1�P. tj 1 -1, -of ;��ti- s���r;;! C ^:::j.ttee Tom: The urea to st J-Lur►,-1 c t l.r�uld be to redi.;ce the v )hzle of line, � Centrifuge mater-- ials r•rr? cL-Pture lid:: at Vie plant using. the additive polymer to reduce the water doing out to lar-oor_s. I. A. b. t� ;:'.-.t is n�cessarv. to -th-=t ccnt,r^.;t►-r work- 1•1thin cin':: -pct I.Lours. _ a : �:� �; Po. , .,�i� �..<, r T4 .....� _. ��_. ._ �: .,... ��� c.�rr.�z 1 s � -. �. -• i1 • w ,Y �� 1.�, n z � !; e �c!z�c� _ c to �.�, c .� r. is�' ! t��� t 1' _'._ .. J :i -• Li .i 1. _ .. __ r:L • 1� - �✓�' .... ��.1a^� l.i►j� �i« r Vr i j .'{•!m J + f • 1 L V��¢r : •r i l the v hriul out on w� (:'i' .`:• ,•,', ;i." .T= �, �Yj l-lewW od , ♦ a�~�n� V ,;.trt-r t(i 1 ^- ';de �, s- %rit^ ir-fct�'mat;o / as to thA bo- st way to go . V�I . .i 1. / ,.. . .,��►t • orae ing'.Iasi! / ( ,�• �. -'V •1 Lcf ir} s, ��l;Lrch?, ? 5. Contact For -r b�r��• t-, •,-t ar t on th!, In r C rA1 n• Th- nes t. h�, r'> �l • r'� ' _�- t�,., h - r,! In thm T :4rm�.t be 7 t -, r, 1..il-*. Tom: w� �.; 1 ::� .-t t t ���� :t i.� `'� bl r ' 80 wr% hoi e t1�AI�� •,�� 1I not be the .:mount t^ h=:u1. T , t Lz,ry I, r I _ON - L,* Toy.. r ���._ �� i.�`�1�, �.,,1 t.; be c�►r;,idc;re�. It riouid ?o,.., o�T contraot, rr.d w,)u d av-- tob•; d�►r.� ��r'1w .. •?link schPd .zl•:3 . Tj:e�•e vi 11 be nirir xrn ;activity wlonE; west of r� :uses, �.nc' roe,? t^ �:� t�w3��j �r.;l-,� :�� r.�c�ss'tr�T. .1c� l,-.� Chior�.dl^ or s,-rayin to cortr�l .• ,, .,�. lc ��-i.. �r�' i `' iJ- is b •r -.e :. 2. Cry ti ;C. .ti �.�_ .._ ..1:�k .Ln �, . .�. I. 3 1l'� �• 2�i� • l I. ��:� e ,,.� r W i +.1 r i c �� ��_� I zJ. s t r: 431.1 l A �: t ;; t e. jq:� t e r �a t y 1 f t p Will ci'` Y dust if contrr; '3t•.,r j,. s n, t , I-.:� u..3uCt c �:�t fry. � .�.� f _ � . �� �, Z.1� c'-+nt� .c � or calcill". cl;lori3t. kr.. .rrDnds. IV. A. 1. We 011 rz:ini:dzvf% trucks on road, -3 b,• horses. -20 we will have 3t. Amil Henith or Twin Citi* Testi-rip,chec�: on vibration i e will m e t with bot'z 3bpjewoo�l and hamse�- C ��znty about traffic patterns. lql , L. 2. Contrxct,ir not to leave .a ;nes sy : ite . We wi 11 chsck,,-them. 'SII, L. 1_ctivity to occur as far away from h�•ases as I:ossible. ^- " ` +..rr•ry� ..r„-....�N^.•p•;r_.;*..; -.01- , -"_ R .. .tw,�..... -... ..,,.s• ac.:• - - �. Minutes of March 23, 1988 Meeting at Water Utility Present: Norm Anderson, Gary Bastian, Clarence Osen, Bill Erigman, Roger Mohror, Mr. Eyler, Tom Mogren, and Carolyn Peterson. Minutes were approved from March 99 1988 meeting. Carolyn Peterson passed out a response sheet from the neighbors to the mitigation of lagoon operational problems, and this was discussed. Mogren: Staff will review .noise level request and will get back to this committee. b. At the last meeting we addressed trucks parking and warming up before 7. We would allow trucks into our gates and into a staging area to wait. Roger: There would be no start-up of work prior to 7, but part of the solution is to have trucks line up on water dept. property. Gary: Do trucks stay on site overnight? Roger: That depends on the contractor. Some trucks load the previous Might. If the contractor owns trucks he could have the option to leave them on site overnight. Garp: If they drove in that morning they would be. warm. Mogren: If they come too soon and can't got in it' s not good to line up on the street and they ahould line up on water dept. property. Roger: I believe they only worked about 6 times on Sat. last year. Toward the end they wanted to wrap up the work. Mogren: What would be the impact on - us if we stated no hauling on Sat.? Roger: You extend the hauling and lengthen it out. 41or; I understand whey you are trying to limit the hours of work. If we restrict them it will drag on longer. Get it done as fast as we can. reps: We -could put a plank in the contract that would indicate that the contractor can only haul on a Sat. with the approval of the water utility, and we would bring it back to this group to got your approval) and to talk of where they would be hauling . Also, the hours, and why he requests to haul on a Sat. Gary: When is contract to be let? How about if we say no Sat. work in Icy or June, and see if the berm goes . up, and then take your suggestion of bringing it into this committee. Maybe after Jure or July, or Sept, or Oct. when you are not out in Tarda as much. Mog ren: What if we would assure you that the contractor cannot haul on -Sat. without approval of --the water utility? We have to be able to handle this by-product, and a .lot deP® nds - on how the- centrifuge operates. Mr. Mohror will explain, and we hops to oporate on the lower level of loads. We will tell you the facts and where we are heads o and we would have to approve the rest of summer. Clarence: May and June no Sat, h urs, PP Gary: Extend that through the 4th of July. Mog ra Suggest Y P n: S est the open the gate shortly before 7, and no hauling until 7. We will meet with the county soon on traffic. 2. Mogren: Roger is the contact person at the water utility. Roger: But :no 24 hours a daffy • Clarence: Sylvan St, is the reason we tire askirig 24 hours a day. Mogren: When the minutes are mailed to you of this meeting, I will provide you with the telephone Pa els hone number to dispatcher* Any calls they can not handle, they can contact me at hone, at any t inns . Roger: If there was hauling being done in the middle of the night it was not water utility* Clarence: This was what people said, and it should be checked on. Caro nt Sometimes a tunp was running at night at the lagoons, or early morning. 1y p Mogren: No equipment is to be started A off hours. Page,2 Minutes of March 23, 1988 Meeting 3. Xogren: I asked staff in preparing contract to provide a minimum level of safety And;-) -capture more material at the plant. No more hauling than we have to., We do not know how successful we, will be in centrifuging but we are moving ahead. T119 higher range of load3 hauled . would be if we are not very successful at capturing material, and that would be around 6,000 loads, -a slight reduction from last year. 4,000 loads is not unreasonable if it works and we do not have failures of the system. In the Pa )-mit we would indicate much the same information to the Counbil. We will not know how successful we will be, but we will be providing them with the same type infor- mation. We would think it would be easier for the contractor to pick up the mater- ial at theP lant than from the lagoons. Rails are used for a lot of equipment coming in. (Listed several products that come in by rail.) Bill: How about hauling out the sludge by rail? Mog ren: This was mentioned. at the previous meeting. one thing that has to be done is we will have to to more active with the state agencies in disposing of lime. If we hauled by rail it would be disposed of in a land fill. PCA would have to review this. We would have somebody represent the water utility to go to PCA, DNR and Health Dept. and remove obstacles. Gary: i Can you recharge lime and use it again? Roger* When they re cal c if ie d lime much of the material had to be sent out to fill. Mog ren: Centrifuge takes out more solids. We will consider every possibility of getting it disposed in a land fill. It is difficult to handle when it is wet. BJ. Mo ren: Re ardi the berm, Roger has contacted the city forester and they would g g, � be able to assist use We have to work around their schedule. I talked with the forester, and one thing he cautioned was to not have standing Roger: water ground trees. We dould plant large trees to start.. The problem is, when you use road for trues we. will have to widen out road and relay the pipes on a new road. This would cause noise behind the ,homes. (Roger had drawings showing possible location of tree toa,►e and be a terrace could be built half -way up the banks.) Mo ren: What is the best time to accomplish thin? (A disoussion on heat of summer B but maybe later, and if they were wad to r e d it would be o. k. ) would not be good, y � • Forester ave me names of some pitta trees which would be suitable. The beat Roger: 8 trees would be Eastern Arborvitae, Ponderosa Pine, or Colorado Spruce. Mg o ren: Tell the ns ighbors survey people may come and look into . the plan. • side of small lagoons we would have to get data of where property line i Roger: on East g For Rose lawn, I t Y talked with Ramsey Co, and they are scheduled to replace the bridge in .1991. They will raise Rose lawn about 2 ft. and if we plant trees before then they would probably have to be replaced. we need to check with the county on their plan. Pr � P Gary. S a ar • You can di large tree with a tree spade now, and if you water it you have a g survival rate.(There was a discussion of whether trees could be planted by Rose - good aurvi . ear and the possibility of them having to be moved.) Rose - lawn this y , 2 . Mog re n. • The information we have is that a filter press is capable to capture 90 9 5% of solids. To me that is a technology that would offer a great amount of relief. It is conceivable that we could greatly diminish the amount we have to haul. Minnea- temThe will probably bo going to contract on the building polis is studying that a Ys . Y but are havingother problems now on the handling of the filter cake. They have come m that the are trying to work out and overcame. It is prudent up with some problems Y � If it appears to follow the progress of Minneapolis for somo assurance of auace8s. PPg tura that amount of solids, I would have no problem recom- mending can ca �r+e can do that p of Dater. During this year they will make a decision of which mending it to the .Board the will o. The centrifuge will capture 50-55% of solids, We believe this is realistic. In the interim We will spend $300,000way� g to $moo 000 on these other syatoms. With that we believe it 8 will have good im.pa et on the lagoon system. We want to get out of the le system you operation too. Regarding the Michigan operations, every y tem goon pe eve havo to deal with the byproductp that articular plant is generating, etc. Every facil- ity i n different. We have based our decision on studying other plants. 1 Page 3 Minutes of March 23, 1988 Mee tir:g B.2. Garys Grating to clean tires seems to take care ofroblem at some Mogren: We would like to to P sites i n look at those . Maplewood, St. Paul Health Dept. Mogren: St. Paul Health De t. would rform t ].Rte matter in the air. At 0 P � testing on particu- ct, meeting they were not prepared. They will do air monitoring to capture dust particles. Is there a standard for diesel fumes? e Check with PCA. I do not , anticipate construction on dikes and hauls will be � ng away from houses. That Should help considerably. Call Mr. Mohror ifou have a 8.'1. we will have more y problem, staff to monitor the project and dust control. We will -make more efforts to see it is enforced. No compactors. Rog©r: No .dikes to be built so there should not be f a need, Clarence: They never used compactors before in building dikes. Rollers were not so bad Trucks on B. Mogren: We will be asking for a meeting with 30Y CO. engineer for traffic and Maplewood, so we can address everythingon hauls activities o Rose - lawn and Sylvan, � n B, Ro9e- Damaged site to be restored. Roger: I know the machinery you are talking about & it is ours..' We will take care of that. We used it when we hauled spent limo 0 ps t NSP. B. Residents request. that Maplewood have the testing equipment to monitor not e s , dust particles, and diesel fumes. Gary: I will check with Maplewood,' and ut it on the ase nda for our Cit Council. P City meeting. Review of water utility spent lime removal plan. Mogren: We want to r vol- ume of 1 sine of o 8 educe the vol g ng out t the lagoons. Wo are moving ahead to the centrifuge in the blue building across the street. This will take the water treatmentbyproducts through the centrifuge and capture solids. You still have some water going out to � lagoon a - g tea:. There will be less water, and less solids, so less volume going S to the lagoon system. In addition, we have a tank on site that is used as a spent lime holding tank. We will try to have a contract al thickemr. which will hold material we take. out of treatment plant and concentrate volume of solids in the treatmentrod- uvt before we Bend i o � t over to be processed sed in . the centrifuge . In the holding tank through the addition of the agent polymer to the byproduct we can conce ntrats the solids to 15-20% solids, and get a contractor to haul right out of that tank in a liquid state in a tank truck instead of an open truck. We believe we will capture it here in the centrifuges, but because they will not be operational until July we will try hauling out in a liquid state as Boon as load restrictionsQ o off. This operation does not hags to do with extraction or excavation, so we do not anticipate this operation will come under the Maplewood ordinance. This will not be included in the plan, but it does impact traffic. Norm: Have you ever contacted the U of M if they have any thoughts of removing liras by other means? Mogren We worked with U civil engineer on this byproduct to determine its applica- tion and its feasibility of land epre'ding. It would take away the concerns of people who thought it should not be spread on land. Some uses are in agriculture, Using it in land fill as a buffer, or putting it in a land fill alone and covering it with ground. Norm: Could it be used to combat acid rain? Mogren: Volume needed to adjust ph would not be that significant. If used to greater extent it would not look very good. In time it may be looked at by our government, Our plan is to get hauling from holding tank. That is the first thing we con implem- ent. mpPlem- ent. If we do not do that we can do nothing until July. Roger: May 15 we will begin the centrifuge ` Mogren: Hauling from holding tank will minimize lime sludge going to lagoons. Rogers Hauling from holding tank is total capture. Mogren: When centrifuge is operational, contract will give water utility option of one contract with 2 different hauling contracts. Water utility can direct contractor to haul from from plant or centrifuge or lagoons. Rogers Contractor will haul on yearly basis of 24,800 cu. yds (6 trucks per day) to 49,060 all. Vda (12r-20 1.rucke Per day) 0 April 20, 1955 Meeting of Advisory Co=ittes Resolution requested of the following: 1. 50 dba noise levels in the residential yards surrounding the W.U. 2. Contractor hours of ?: CO a.m. to 5:00 Pomo 3. Vo Saturday work through July 4. After July 4, if the contractor sees a necessity- for Sat. Work he will apply to W.U., stating purpose of work, what it will involve, and length of the work, If W.U. agrees this is a nsa ce s s itYt Roger r Mohror will bring this re qus st to the meeting of this advisory cottee for approval or disapproval. 4. Staging area for trucks prior to loading at 7:00 a.m. 5. Berm and tress. Suit a drawing of the plan to the surrounding neighbors for approval, along with an approximate time frame. • 6. Truck traffic pattern.,, 7, Noise and particulate monitor. Health study on effects of breatkirg lime dust on a long-term basis. Envirormaental study on lime sludge in ground water. 8. 2/; hour phono number to contact. g, Explain "damaged site be restored." (statement in Mitigation of Lagoon Operational Problems. p. 3) Minutes of April 27, 1988 Meeting of Advisory Committee Present -at , John Nowak, Bill E ngma n, Carolyn Peterson, Ray Eyler, Tom Mogren, Roger Mohror, and Norm Ande rook. Meeting began with a discussion of MPCA noise control rules and a copy was passed out. Mogren: The Utility intends to monitor noise to determine if thio is a problem. The standmrds will be complied with, We will do everything we can to suggest ways we can do better than the standard to minimise noise in the area. Carolynv How often will you xonitor? Mogren: I will meet in May with the Health Dept. and they will provide me with ih-- formation of how they will do this and show as equipme at they have. If we ha -re to, we will lease equipment. The contractor will be required to meet requirements of law. We will go through the standards with the contractor. We have to go through the permit prone a s first. Nowakt Will inighbors have ai7 input on when monitoring will be done? Mogren: A lot will depend on the contractor. If contractor is not complying we will , have to :monitor every day. We will monitor from the day he begins to deter- mine if he is complying with the standards, and from that dete rains how often we need to monitor. . Contractor hours. Mohror: I see no problem with 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the beginn1mg art -of the contract. I would proppse we would handle it like the issus of Sat. P work. Prior to Aug. 1 set l3as.•i.t to work until 5, and thou re-evaluate, Norms What happens if we would get a real wet season? Mohror: That would be a problem. After Aug. we may have to ask that the contract- or be allowed to work until 6. Mogren: We look at creating a certain amount of room. We do.: snot know when the beginning of the contract will be., so we can gime a time whe n 4orking later will not be rweeasary, or Sat. We have awarded a contract for intercepting material before it goes to the line ponds. We will set a aiand a maximum which may haye to be hauls d. Mohror: We probably cannot get contract started until Aug. 1. It depends on the contractor and how well he is organized. Mog rens If we applied for the permit May 1, how long would it take to get permit? Norat I do not think it will take a long time unless Maplewood would have to in- vestigate it. The biggest barriers would be settled right bora. whatever you settle here I think can be agreed upon. Mohror: I think the contract will be started between July and Aug.. 1. _ Mogren: Let us put a date on the time of work hours. _ Nowak: I do not want to change the time from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mogren: our intention is to haul from the NE corner. Could we go to 6 if work is w not near the houses?. Mohror: There is not ouch room up in the NE corner for trucks to go in and out:" Mo eh: We can agree to look. at that again to find out how this Would work out. Noras' *It has been suggested that trucks. go through plant property. ., Mo ren; Area where we have the most potential for staging. is_ i way .between Rose - g . lawn and B Mohror: I talked with the county. They will not get involved in how truckx go. Mr. Haider -amd -V -propose empties would come in on Roselawn and fill and go out -on Be' They P could line u in the area .of the dikes. No equipment would operate until T, Trucks 'could stage in NW corner. below ego . E man: Could they have so awry trucks lined up there the ht. before? Mo n: Mavy of the trucks are owmr operated, and we are also trying to avoid maintenance .vn site lers Gould most. of trucks be staged on WU property and only 3-4 in production -area so there is no delay? Page 2 April 27, 1988 Meeting Mohror t We could stage a small amount of trucks in IE cor. mr. Maybe b. _ Mogren: We will work on that proposal and contact contractor to see if this is un - , '=•reasonable: Lot me find out what it would take. : `Se rn And trees. Mohror showed survey sheet of houses and al fields, dated April 26 With -this we should be. able. to plan a reasonable plot of berm. Mogren: The further up the slope we plant the more benefit there will be to Deigh- bors. • We should have a proposal for the next *eating* Carolyn: When you have a drawing of your proposal I would like to call a meting of the neighbors affected by this to have them review it. Noise & partiaulates in air. Mogreni ; I talked to _ MF CA to get information on air quality standards. The way to proceed is to first go out and ' gather air -borne material. Then analyze it to see if there is a problem. - Carolyn: On windy days there is a lot of dust and lime blowing. in the air oven with no work going on. Mogren: We would be so pleased when we no longer need to use lime ponds and cant do more restoration. 24 hour a day numbers Which can be ca lIe d are t Tie a tme nt Plant 489-1600 Distribution Yard 298-6888 Water - utility employees would be available to go out and investigate a problem. Nowak' Do you log calls? - Mogre n: We log people, who go out to inve st i.ga te. We could sake it a *requirement that if a neighbor called that call be docume zte d and notify Mr. Hohror, . _ 'Explain cod site be -restored." Mohror: This is of a long and short tern'mature. There will be ropair this year to establish as Where it has sufferred da�aage and re8tore the site so it is not bare ground. Longer term would be the planting of trees. Mogren: When staff can tell us, we will not be using an. area that has been disc turbe d we ,an return it to a more natural - to . We will ha -i -9 ta.tt.z r. oontrolc thi.w- yearbast year contract was a disaster, We were frustrated ourselves. Soil test borings. Mohror: Maybe 4 will be taken in random areas around bank of property as part of permit requirements. Maplewood wask far it in all pe rzits: Raklic. Mohror: We would like to try a method MiD apolis uses. Three time is this simmer we would like to rake, aerste p and MOT material aro wod in lagoons, and ge t it to dry better. Minneapolis . believes they can inarssse the evapora tion by stirring it up. It would take maybe. 3 days eseh occasion of I time is caro4ns Minneapolis is in an industrial arae so it doss ndt bdther anyow. I hate to see them doing this so close to air bow s e . (Shoved picture of Large mach - ice -dbing this in 1-88.) There- teas s let of noise mss► it and our houses were -closed-'up in Jan. Get the beth built .and trig. pl:►nted -first. NO2*n't We could try it an it, a` b0i: d !'tet be Irl* 1rtit 8 or 8:30 vazz. ` We would be willing t6 611jin. to ! oeftittga est aid ha" re quire om . menta ' of notes. We Would � b trr it bret��t it �cedwoi the mbar of loads having to be hauled out to %0010. SPe nt : lin . Mogre n: We took bids for ha 00 tate rw rrm within plant arenas • .. and are now in process of award iii that outrta't • W322. bav* is t at 6h Toll, of �,iin de Ylt OL1ti to Z,ag OOBs . � - � � � . �� � ' � • �; � �' � • -' � �- � � - �- . ,► - . - - Mohror:06 Ce intrif swill be onUli.0but +�� .15• . we O"e to haws ee tttr i f �s at least • month prior to t � lse0.."� WS . gatti�ag eon�re `std � � � �tsr�.il ng within the plant, Mr.. Egesa.'tr3ggered. ��i. tbWgbt . on ha n� from nt -tank and cs rrttilbdo go sett td Ries St, f . an removedaP's . aidertmg a roadway to Rios St. - Idea is. to bring trucks in off Ries. ga. X. l 8R 04ek8 a 12 ft. ~- Mohrar t .. ng .- roadway, Wo will be in soon _and Qontzadtor x3.11 do fog- ttg . 1 way ro y. g_ Sylvan sd.- ve Mor n: I haet with of 11til:t� : as tilt ' certain a of ob3s�as time have j► ewwt.f _ �t f acs li.tro Planes we Can forzati n pr y and. Ma l pro od tip � t s Ah oriU044 to amw true t a r*te shone . . brim to . thi• grasp pis L I P. nv otbe r Adtl t int i ars : • ....: Pond in this area. There. bQ„ f r• ... ti May 25, 1988 Minutes, o� i�'U Advisory Committee Meeting ler Chair. Norm Anderson, George Rossbach, Bill Engman, Clarence Present: Ray EY y Osen, Roger Mohror, and Carolyn Peterson. Committee reviewed minutes of last Meeting e Carolyn Nterson gave Roger Mohror two additions or changes to be made to his minutes. One regards an addition to his York b the contractor, and the neighbors want in the record that statement on Saturday Y Mr. gre suggested Mo n s ested the procedure of the contractor contacting the WU with any request to do Saturday work after J d the to be brought bef ore this co, � � ane reqommi for consideration* The change involved Age ndra 4 being come eted to read that WU re - se ntati�re s made t re P his re ue st. A copy of this addition and change is attached. . q resolution. Bill Engman states he saw a grain truck going Final mitigation list from the truck. Rose lawn on 11, uncovered, and lime dust was flying East on � o this. Mohror: Trucks are to be covered. I will check into Osen: Tanker trucks do not make as much noise. Mohror. Area West of small lagoons is being seeded and the whole area is being re- stored. We werewatering there one day. have a • �.. Be rm and. a' . . Mohror: There was a misleading comment that we would draw- ing ready for today. We have been out surveying property lines, and I had a re vie w H said. he would like to have the committee members think with Mr. Mogre n last. Friday. e 8 about i1.1 . out some aspects of this job. There is no problem and we w g o ahead. One thing of there are very mature trees that already exist* Some i s, on a numbs r of these lots lots maybe could not see the lagoons as it exists now. To plant the trees low B o as _ would put the trees down ao low, and we would have to riot to disturb existing trees _plant higher. Let us think think about it and give us some direction* What do you side of large lagoon is no neighbors think? The south s problem with. trees and berm• Q a e - archite ct will meet with WU Thursday, and ve ori11 got t advie• from him on A Ira ads c p ornm3.tted to doing this project to your satisfaction. how to handle this. I�4r. . Mog re n i s c We could nail a special meeting next week for interested people to tell them what we have learned:, and to get their input. Carolyn:olyn. I would interested peoples • ld be in favor of such a meeting,. and invite inters pe P and trees should be located. It was decided A discussion followed of Where barna architect an Thurs- that Carolyn would meet with WU representatives and the landscape arc 0 onto the neighbor's yards to Bet their per - day for a tour of the banks and t0 g up Thursday, ?:00 p.m. A meeting. of interested people was set for J u� 2, T y, P at the WIT conference room. The landscape a archite ct will meet with us and will bare s drng awi of his proposed plan for our inspection* educt- or: I talked with I''h'. Mogren about the $500 d Contractor insurance . Mohr ore and he said not to be concerned about this . The contractor i' liable for this. That. is his problem. ct prope This letter came Ose n : InsuraDCe Co. is going to come out and ins pe P Pa about a month ago. ad us and he was waiting for infor- Caro n: I talked on the phone with the � � Mo re n � requested. d. I asked him to contact Mr. • Q :Dation from Mr. Mogren, which he had req has Withheld from again. Can the $500 deductible come out of the . amount Mr. Mogren the contractor?. \ Mohror= I would assume $o. ,Carolyn: (To . Mr. . Mohror) Do you reme mbe r about how maw t iabe s you were called for wa s .,shaking our houses? in 1987 complaining the large comma Mohror Ido remember bei called about this and going .: I don't have any number. down and makj g them stop the compactor* a e this damage has for asking is the insurance sia adjustors y Carolyns Iii reason believe that the majority of the over a period o f .time . The � ighbor a been happening of the compactor* That was the f iir st our homes was eauaed in 1987 by the use ` on ride damage to Neighbors who litre across the street and even year the compactor was usfd. Ne ig _ ;.- _ _ _- .. ... .r. - - s, ;; �X:; ..r,t.•. • is .: .,'•• .. , '. `,•+ •I.. �i•r{'•�•• ,rti i ../ =',f �. .j 'V' ,\„-j"t'-i' ♦ • •'�.• • •• . • i- .. •(,_: :± t•. .•.t .,; .r^ K_'1I .' . .` A .. f �i-, r ~ • Y •�.'.••�w.yj��” � .,.j 1 ,i• '+�,'.:.j'F�.\--•�.ti^•.D..' .C'_'. :.."T" ��' �tiy.'- ,._ 1:. :: � .•e • _•Z: ,.'. •4i .Jw�S'.1 *-.?w� Y r ~ •,�•i._. rf• 7 1: 7{ t .►,•• r ..i •• '?i T�.-Z - : _ • s' .. _ . .... •. �+.1. ♦�..�w •-. • :=.•.f I •• i _ . •,,.a. •!•...►� :•7 �. ,ri1�•iy' r •Y� N..,.Cj }.► •'i 1- .i•�^� wit �«•i r .. __ ..�.-ri wr. _y. ,•r .' •.• . '`.f moi,.• .A•..,i .j►. ..••N. •• .... , 'S"t`i •. v rC'iei:.Z-'•K •Ky•il_y it.<<.1 .7 �iaF •:•_• _ y .! l "_- :i i . =r -. �. 0 2 I 25 1988, Minutes of Advisory Committee )*sting Page ' streets cad me ask what was causirg the terrible ahak.ing, and that it fe It like lle. an earthquake.. I know that I called Roger at least 15 times to complain of the com- , pactor ahs�kins our house and I know several other neighbors called hila many times Mohrors In 4 weeks the road from Rice should be done • when it is not raining the trucks Will use . that road. • It is a red Osens One noiaey. truck goes by about 6:15 a. m. and crake s me up. _ truck. Mohror: I will' check into that* o int the ponds* A discussion of neighbors saying they don t Raking of : Zime p i rakingdome because a large machin has to be used, ng noise and making a me s e around the lagoon. - . better if we rake ponds in the giummer. It did Mohr o r s We would got a be drying . Minns a - You have to try things to see how they work. not work last wiener. (Jan..) - - olio is raking --their ponds, in a p - � compare Minneapolis' location to our location here Carolyn* But you can't � a -and the do not have neighborhood. Minneapolis is in a commercial area,,. y . residential ig . the problems we do • _ 3p� solids he to dries out the rest does not want t0 dry. 25 Eyler: After t p are ha title d out of the fields* • . Dorms Whare do you haul the lime? of the location. Mohror. We are ha�.ng it to farm fie Ids, I dont know the name The formers want it badly. FA Carolyn Peterson ,N _ _ � • • . -7 _ •;7 �v � .I jr +lam• • • ..• .Y r• •.. / \' • ..t , • j�� t �.. i .. .- .•.. - • i e••. �,,,�' .� •Y' •.~..� • � tii •;►.tLw�q'-•+q�1��•�.i�+w+j(.SG�.%: S7I�•�i:��RC; i. �t•�}� P•� �1'9.' w '� � y •: _ '_. �• 1 •Ij „l: -•R'�,r ..� �` � rM 1 7. y.T • L �� %• •... 1y ,; .. �•.,. S • t •�• . �. .. •w ♦.►..i •��►•tAt+S • �. 1►. �.;t ,+•� •�'.•: t� •�. e;,jl'too-% Uwat �,I ,� �./` \.�►; y ii M •� `,t� ��{���``S � T.� 1 ♦ ... �• � .wi ♦.► ..� '- � �.. j•�: �� L w S� '. � i � ��Ni��1 1�i7�Jh .• `� q ~ � .•. �• t r � +� .�. wA -�K. 'r .N, •ii • f . � ••. _ _ • � ^moi'' ��. �� .�`:.:.... ... • . _.' • . ' -. ,�:../ v ', .�► �_ � .tit•• 'u.'.' �" .r �,. . •.s f.. r' : � r• .Y . aitriw 1 !� � + i't i*� ��`,S : `- +...' M''=iY- wk r �. �.. y� ' � : • ` •.., . • . = . • •t• .tom �I :�+ -.-ri . ��Y-a�C � '��' -�' �� � y •�' iC .. . «' 4 ' ,t �t i��%�;�,� ;� � •,� • �; `�T ' . y`"l. �"4� � .'1/ � +. �. � •� ` - b` ..•... .r.. l.'S � ��. • ..� ..-y y+y� �:.�.•►�.•••• f.- , ,�� _ . ..� .. • r -r lam„ � . � �.ni:- 'l► .. ..� «..y ti.'r.. id..� �+r.-D• .... .4 .� " +"�.� f r 1Y ' ..�r � �.�� �, .y�_ `' wJ 4 • i V ...� . i.�!rL..�+• •+� L►.�-ir :.• w+i. .ii.:wi...IR. �•1•. �• . �. _ i w i�T7� 3. �a±i! r`� '�i% dv s Committee of April 27, 1�FY1" - - Comment's.. on. minutes of Advisory p �`" . Nir �ioh r add the following to the minuted ,� 'above Aee"We quest, -: • W ,,i• •`•:.� + .t h � ^� � Q or Aar �ma to O�t tee � • . ..•, ,,,•tt • ' • r' ... t j .. .,1 : • •�* � ! re r• yL �:-A;♦ f• '~ m�re& ±r, it •r•�' .1• p {♦.•` i 1. ��• •r� / T, 1 f •f 1 t atur+'.� '1.^{t. •i r•{ •.` .rt • J; TI O•it •' i •1.. • •., �t `. } , 1 .'►' S?'% rC •►'- • ! a the March coza:nit►tee ' MOOng, 4n K (Add).wbeeA discussed t t i . 1 .j ! r .�1 l: l► ►.,} , .• fL'1+ .• .:.{..;•. . t ,t '/ •1 i• ,} • ti ' ' •}'�-.�♦'.�� �) �en. Agr�e�• , .( �r'rl. t• `�.~,'�t �' •� ••? •1.=1' •••• I•, -_ T ` .• .• I ,., •7 �1•t1 r�= �'L1, fr� \ 1 '. i � ���' '•1' � . • •• j� up a•nt.+t6. .•.%. ]. '! t `r••+• {l•.).• 1• •ir 1' % ,+ J �' ..T T is • • . 'ter J ,•.if _A1)a,.:,con*ractor see s a nece ssity for Saturday rk. h$;. � 1 a&P ':' , �= k what it will involve., -and t purpose of work,, olve, . and is ngth o� . _ to the .'dater. ,iTtil�..ty,, stair pure , i - .`,� the �i ter Utility a roes this. is a, necessity, Kogan/h'':_:will the, cork projeC' �jia:.�,f 4 8 :.� .0 , 7. ... ' brie this re test rt.h� committee meeting .for approval. or., disapproval......./s,:.,.•, �z g. rM tie rda I to :r N o rak irg of spent -lime. t e 1.acir "mom. i.ttee members" with"Water Utility rapresert- Change 2nd .sentence by. r p • on th,i , . o,=ittee„ as neighborhood and �ap'lewood rerr a se uta gives did rot, .make atives s' c � .. . tho sb re qua.,; Ar L :s to to mo nt s .� •Y' r a�.•s. - a• \7!•x•:1 .T;; tr .; _ •� " - -t "- r �►„takinglace. It re wires a lams hole©y machine.,. • e obiaC,t..to Uds raki� p • .., pe " i Ihe,y , ., , . rt is not l��i. 1. to.•.campare , this to the I.i.rrle8 lis o rs on. are an . _ I watched the 'large, zacUne. do industrial •area,..where. _it AP.Pi. not bother a gone. g .� T thin "rakin " •sake meek in Januarys 1988, and it was noisey even with our house.. a.. and it "rake d!t a]..Z. closed : .cause o w.� me r.: Come over and inspect -the shuc�ge p / ? { . . _ o e level of the l ime• to - the level . i n r• and see if you;,can t�3.]. aft difference i n th the otherp onds rich were , ',not raked. I see no difference. _.... Carolyn Peterson ..:., a '88 July ?, 1988 Mr. Mike McGuire City Manager Maplewood City Hall Maplewood, NN 55109 Res Advisory Commj.ttee to Water Utility Dear 0: The Advisory Committee met on July 6, and we were very pleased that Gary Bastian, Norm Anderson, George Rossbach, and Ken Heider were present. I'am sending you a copy of the minutes I took at this meeting for your file,, because Maplewood is involved in the planning of the retaining gall to be built, and I thought it might be good for you, to have on record the conversation between Ken Haider and the landscape arehiteat* Would you please make. copies of these minutes and pass them on to Gary, dorm, George, and Ken, and anyone else who might have an interest. OnPa ge 2. No. 3, a discussion of paving the haul road. We request that oiling or paving of the haul road be listed in the. permit issued to the water utility as a condition to be mat be f ore arjy hauling is begun this year, There has been no work done on the ponds, so they have had all year to pave this haul road. All they have done is talk about doing it. When the permit is prepared would you mail a copy of it to the Advisory Committee members so we have time to read it through? We have talked about an agreement between Maplewood and the eta to r utility where the utility would agree to be res- ponsible es-Ponsible for maintenance and upke e p , ate. of the retaining gall, replacing of arborvitae that might die, etc. Is 202e0ne preparing this agreement, and if go, we would like to be co n - suite d. Very truly yours, elf, t Carolyn` Peterson July 6, 1988 Minutes of Advisory Committee Meeting Present: Roger Niohror, Ray Eyler, Bill Engman, John Nowak, Carolyn Peterson, George Rossbach, Ken Raidwe, Norio Anderson, and Gary Bastian. David Reid. Review minutes of May 25 meet Roger: All items on mitigation list can be taken care of in a contract, which will be brought before the Maplewood City Council shortly. E n Nowak and Peterson had written Mr. Mohror and requested that his minutes for the May 25 Advisory Committee, - which read: AGENDA ITEM N0. 2 &3o --F 1 Resolution of Mitigation List. All mitigation list items have been resolved, etc* be changed to read: All mitigation list items have been discussed, and solutions to the problems have been proposed. Af to r a discussion of this matter, Mr. Eyler suggested that the minutes be changed to read: "All mitigation list items have been discussed by this committee, and pro- . g posed_ solutions to the several items have been agreed upon by the neighborhood re si- -dents and the water utility." This was . agreed upon as acceptable. i Reid resented, a drawirC of a preliminary plan for the screening project. David P t and myself. There is a retain - David: This is a prelim3.r.�ary plan by the residents � inn wall and arborvitae had to screen the neighbors on Jackson &Skillman. The slope drops from 20 am 10 feet and the fence. is down below. The retaining Wall would P be built up on Pe y, P WU ro rt planting the hedge, and moving the fence on top of the wall, and filling in the bank, bringing land out from yards to arborvitae hedge and _ P� rovidi screening view of the ponds. On Skillman we do not meed a retaining wall and several yards d have a lot of trees, so there will be a single row of arborvitae . lour. Along Skillman from 91 - 111 is a slope where retaining o n the back of their � wall is necessary, and the property line fence will have to be relocated. The hedge and the road and along 117 4W167 needs dome fill where there on the line would be bey. ' i a ditch. This would make planting get away from the . road so trucks do not brush e UP against trees. Wall could be a wall of blocks, L - shaped to hold dirt, dra n well, and are easy to install. Worm: How high? Ve • 0 0 feet. etation can grow into the wall and will get some green on Dave . Up t 2 g o The lime sludge pipe which run along property would the walk to prevent erosion. � P to the wall would be right on top of it. Whether road needs be moved ,out, otherwise put Slope w1.11 0 or not has not been resolved. A s i rg le wall will be p up Pe . be moved d 1 be drainage. 2011 Jackson has no interest in arything taper a little so there will g feels he is screened ha►ppe Hing . His house is set back and he has several trees. He out enough now. Carol n: How about on the South side of Sxlllman? c T . to these ole y.et. I wanted to talk to Roger first. Dave: I have not talked people will discuss this. There are some evergreen trees on North aide now. Carolyn: But they are real small. Norm: How much slope would there be on 20 feet? Dave: 1 _ 3 at a of t 20 feet would go back 7 feet. WU has used this typ steepest. wall at Qadns i s Heights* On N side of Hwy 36 at a golf course rear Snelling is an example, Nowak: Would WU be doing back filling? from back fill o up. Pressure of dirt keeps blocks Eyle r s Would have to ba as you g eliding out. • We will robably have a contractor do the job. Roger. P • What is the time frame of when this will occur? fall* Nowak. o too far i n future. Wall could take place this Roger: The wall is probably not ain. It might not be advisable to do planting this fall. Depends on r L Pace 2 July b, 1988 lutea of Advisory Committee Dave: It is a good time to plant evergreens in fall. Availability of trees might be a question. Carolyn: Would you sod out to trees in yards? Dave: Either sod or seed. Sod is not available now. If time is right seed would be advisable . Nowak: ThepP i e to be replaced carries lime sludge out to ponds. Why is it behind houses where it fills in the ponds with lime close to our homes, and you have to exca- vate more ©f to n behind the houses? Eyler; It carries water out and fine the hole in the pond. I don't think it puts more lime close to hoUBe s. We have not put anything into lagoons this year except on Sunday s. We might be able to stop that also. Carolyn: In talks with the m ighbor s, we would rather have sod put in than seed. � Eyler: Whatever we do, our intention Would be to put it down and have it grow. Roger: Contractor would start in one place and go to anther. Raider: On retaining wall, we would want to review this plan. On a wall that high, you ne e d to really analyze if this would do the job. Dur building inspector ,-ill do � an analaeis. On Mails over 4 feet high we. require this. Too many f s il, so we would _ is checked `out an engineer, to stand 20 feet high. The last 10 years we want this � have had many of them go down. t s say and I doe not how thick the wall Will be . If you get a lot of moisture, y they free $e , would they hold up? Dave: I have some photos showing walls that high. • would look better than a concrete wall. Have you given thought f o more George: This screen along Rose lawn? Roger: That is next on our agenda. Carolyn: es taken • How about a shade tree for neighbors who lose their shade. from trees down on the bank? Not too many are affected, but we are. res our beyond onsibility. I think it is enough we are planting Roger. We Would get Y P the h'° dge 'our shade . You never gave Carolyn: But it is be caus4 of your problem we are losing � the neighbors hbors when you raised the a consideration to what impact it would have on g dikes up so high. That is the reason all of this screening is necessary. Nowak: When they come in to fill will they use a compactor? etc. , I think there will have to be compaction Roger: Depending on the contractor, . used, but it does not have to be vibratory. , , Would it • established what process would residents have here? Nowak: If damage i s � be the same as other claims? Roger: I Would aes=e so. Contractor would have to be insureds Eyler: Any more questions for David? Thank you, David. • I have lked to our engineering division and asked 3. Paving haul road.. Roger. � them to look into paving of haul roads Maybe part of it would be p ave d this year) or ed, We Would be improving road d for dust control. H o wa k : O i li ng would be a te► mp o ra ry fix. Rogers We might have to oil it every year. Nowak s Residents cofeel that f or 2 - 3 years it could be fine , and then it would uld gradually Start slippier' St. Paul streets are oiled. They Roger:• have oiled roads for 100 years • will you pave the road?. We Would like it paved bef ore you start haul When y Fa t would Carolyn: we be in hauling . In the beat now i Roger: We Would like to do oiling before g be good to do it. mane was being purchased. • le of meet ou ings back you said an air quality Nowak. A c p Als o a noise monitor was ordered Wks e Rogers Yea , through the health department* moo• the getting a lot of dust erosion off the Carolyn: People on Sk�.I.].man to 11 us y are and this Could this be monitored now? barge sludge p Year. Nowak. • And determine if this is a health hazard. Roger** We would takea base test . 4 , • . Page 3 Judy 6, 1988 Minutes of Advisory Committee � 4&5. Planta trees on Roselawn & Co. Rd. Be Roger: We could go to the gate on Rose lawn Ave . Haider: seyCo. f s in P rope ss of replacing bridge on Rose lawn. They may widen Ram Rose lawn to North. It might be advisable to wait until their plans are final. Er�gmans Whose re ap ons ibility are the weeds growing on N. side of Rosa lawn? ler: County would be responsible for those on roadway. �B There is a water main there we will Roger: We will look at planting on Co. Rd. have to consider. Carolyn: he want. Will you meet with the people living there and see what they area. Roger: The permit requires us to make certain plans, �. Drawing of restored g i look. but it is hard for us to envision just how the completed area win Nowak: We would want what Dave drew, and a cro.ss profile, so if a prospective buyer wanted to see the plan he could. Raider: You will be presenting enti to Maplewood City Council proposals, and this would It would be the basis f or issuing a permit. The planning ,fie on file with Maplewood. depart me nt, Geoff Ole on, would have the file. The permit will spell out the on- going rocess, and so every year it woto s8 uld be updated. Nowak: People want to be able y to 8 P ook. P ' potential buyer that this is how it will 1 Georgie : Will those dikes stabilize now? n plant . a tion goes, and if we can stop we ca p - Roger•. It depends on how the mining opera a o s , and the aide slopes would �rega to to . h last meet - �' Atte deductible. Roger: I am not quite certain What you mean. 7' $500 he contractor is responsible. I would i I told you I talke d with Mr . Mog re n, and t could come from the money Mr. Mogren withheld from contractor. imagine the money Carolyn: Can you check with Mr. MogTeII on this? Roger: I will. Eyler: k7 other questions? Carolyn: Trucks speeding on Roselawn. Roger: Call the police • talk with the Chief and have h.im check into it . Haider: I w3.11 and said trucks are speeding and Someone on Roselawn called nye Last night Carolyn:� Shake houses when they speed. start at 4 a.m. Also told that they Raider* * I will c411 police and get them to monitor. the lime cake into a truck* Roger:0 an July 15 the centrifuge will start and dropoP Carolyn: What noise does the centrifuge make? he man Roger: The noise should not bother ar7one. It is all enclosed, and only t standing next the *&chime should hear it. � � ; • on use Maplewood City Hall for our next me t n . .Bastian. I make a mot i we P Eyler: Meeting set for August 24. Haider: I will reserve a room for you at City Hall then. 110wak: When will you apply for permit? We will g Roger:• ll o for permit very soon, within 2 weeks. Carolyn Peterson August 24, 1988, Meeting of Advisory Committee 8 9.88 Present: Norm Andersons. Bill Engman,'Ken' Haider; George R:ossbach, Ray Eyler, Roger Mohror, and Carolyn Peterson. Meeting at Maplewood City Offices. Minutes of the Judy* 6 meeting were sent to each member, and asked for approval. Carolyn: In the July 6 minutes David Reid stated that 2011 Jackson St. has no interest in the proposed ac,#eening project. Mr. Hackman called me on July 8, and informed me that he does want to be included in the plan, and 2rr. Mohror was informed. July 6 minutes'were approved. ' Roder Mohror had cross sections of the project and they were shown for observation. Exhibit G is going to be With the permit application for the excavation permit. The wall will be 2 ft. wide. All of the material will be filled and compacted behind the homes. We will try to keep the equipment small, and we x111 have to have releases from each of the home owners. There mgy be trees grow on the slope which owners may want to keep. George: This will be one Wall rather than a terrace? Mohror.,,- Yea. The second page is a profile of where the Kell x111 end. At Duea's the trees will be l row` on their side of fence. Page 3 is So. side of lame lagoon. The first drawing of John Hackman hams. We x111 have to fill into the lagoon area and re- locate the pipe. We will abandon one that is in place and relay new pips. George: Filling considerably N.'of present location? Mohror: Yes. P.L. is Property Line. Trees x111 be on WU side of fence. Now pipe will be out about 10 ft. from wall. Carolyn: We need to have a meeting of interested property owners so they can see these cross sedtion plana. Mohror: We could set s meeting at Parkside Fire Station. I will call Carolyn Peterson Thursday when I check any calendar. .Carolyn: Will they get started on the project this fall? Mohror: I hope so. We Want to get the filling down behind the homes so any settling that will occur will have happened before planting. We are.hoping to just narrow up the road on East side of small lagoon. The cost is about $40,000 for trees clone. Ken: The wall they picked is e food product. Norm: Does Park Nursery Brox their own trees? George: They probably have to ordeir them from other growers because of the size of this project.. Insurance damage cl%�ms to homes: Mohror: I talked with Tom Mogren and the WU received a letter from the contractor's insurance co., and they see no reason why they are responsible. The City Attorney wrote a return letter and asked them to explain why they have no responsibility. There should be a reply in a Meek to 10 days.. The retainage on the contract can not be Heid by the City to pay the X500 deductible, but if e settlement is not reached this may have to go to court on these issues. Ken: We have been through this on city business and find this to be true. Carolyn:You are saying the $500 would have to come direct from the contractor? Mohror: There may have to be a court case to determine who is liable. In answer to questions about the centrifuge: We are doing experiments with the centrifuge to get a better rate of recover. We x111 get better recovery in winter -time. Carolyn: Who will keep us posted on the insurance claim? Mohror: Mr. Mogren will reply when he hears from the insurance co. Eyler: Next meeting of this committee set for 4th Ked. in October, the 26th. Shrubs for dike Wall near Co. Rd. Bi Mohror: I have talked with Dave Reid about this, and we would plant trees on WU property. WU is p1a � �io revise the dike system there. The dike still be moved and X11 not be as high as it is now, This would be in 1988-89 plan. Fj Page 2 August 24, 1988 Meeting of Advisory Committee Paving haul road: out ft. off Rose lawn 0 or: The plan is moving ahead. We would pave auays, ab 30� M hr P on the haul road, and also 3-100 f t, in from Co Rd. B. and oil the rest of the haul r now. road'f 0. This should help solve, dirt going out on the streets, as the paved _ portion would be kept t and Washed. We would move the entrance on Co. B so the P trucks Would g0 on the paved portion longer and Wheels Would get cleaned off before they go out on B. s orf ce has to be Ken: Paved surfaces with bumps in it Will help, but the paved kept clean. M0 or: Street sweeper should be on job to solve problems. hr PB Carolyn: Are you planning this paving for this fall? �a Mohror: We are hoping to have it done this 1. f 1 • there is no more discussion I would like to adjourn this Meeting. Syler. If t e Carolyn Peterson JAN, o 9 in December 19, 1988, Advisory Committee Meeting at Maplewood City Hall Present: Ken Haider, Roger Mohror, Ray Eyler, Clarence Osen, Norm Anderson, Colleten Engma n, Carolyn Peterson, and Peter Kischel, St. Paul Health Dept. Ray Ey� ler Chair. Minutes of August Advisory Committee meeting approved as submitted and mailed. 2. Use of dike roads when hauling: Mohror: Hauling will be on existing dikes as they are now. I believe the question was if dikes to be built on North lagoons will be Carolyn*Q used for hauling as a 2 -way rood. Mohrors (Showed drawing of 2 new dikes) Yes, roads on dikas around lagoons would be used for excavating. The question Was, could dikes be moved to North more, and roads would be further away from houses. We reviewed this request and we decided dikes need to be where the are proposed. It is necessary for utility to have dikes because the dike is over a 90 in. conduit. It is causing too much pressure there ,. � ,, a f ,�.• �,-ienci problems with the on this conduit and has ,.o be mcw"Pd e_f. W_ a_.. a og . conduitsettling.. It i s necessary to move dikes over and a lot of lime will be moved a nprWay. We will abide by the provisions of the extraction ordinance in doing this work. Noris: Has the entry been mooed on County Road B? Mohror. Yes , • it has been moved. We have filled the hole in the dike to the North so we can move lime there if we have too The Utility has 2 90 -inch conduits. The conduit to the North is under the high dike. It is necessary. to take this dike s � down so it i not so hen on the conduit. It settles at joints and could be a problem, in times • not here toda is out of town, but he says it is unacceptable Carolyn. John: Nowak is T � dikes so close to their houses . I wish he were to speak for self. to have the 2 dike s Mohror: You are doing a good job of stating his wishes. Carolyn. Just Bo • you know that he feels very strongly about this, and we join him.. Y I am remembering just one f � year 8 o in Oct, Nov. , and Dec.,1987, how the Water Util- ity , itjr hauled in fill dirt in a frenzy of activity to raise this same dike about 2 5 f t . o show this work. Are you telling us you did not test this and I have photographs t conduit t see ee how much of a load it could hold, that you just hauled in all that fill on top of c and, wit and now f ind that it cannot hold the weight, so you have the to move the dike off the top of the conduit? . moved to protect the conduit. The Utility is committed to Mohror. It has to � m � its o eration to l.i�ait a s much as possible the amount of material put out in change p the lagoons. We have cut our discharge by at least 50%. cu. Carolyn. How can that your t be when permit application lists 90,000 am 130, 000 ft. lime . t o be removed for the next 5 years? Mohror: We cannot be sure how touch we will have to removes Clarence If dike could be moved 100 ft, North it would help. . o desi n would o. It could be physically constructed Ken: I t i s a question of h w g i either wayt but this is probably a value Judgment* • construct the dike at the NF corner .first and put in the first Mohror: We will constru ie nt t have the two lagoons in a raw. We ori 11 follow lagoon. It would. be more efficient P the extraction ordinance in all points. Minneapolis has decided to abandon its fil- ter presses. There are filterpresses that are operative in other cities. Colleen: Would they give ary reason why they abandoned it? Mohror: Costo Eyler: It is a very com- • Nadia used is not always conducive ducive to material extracted.. plicated system: good reason w these two lagoons cannot be located to Carol ns .Can you give us a g � a to s 3� large lagoon where you have plenty of room that 8 ng ways the Northeast end of g g away from the homes? Page 2 Dedember 19, 1988, -Advisory Committee Meeting Mohror: oure osition is that we have no question of changing our position, and we con- tinue to have it. Carolyn: Your. stated purpose was to get this dike and lagoons away from the horns. Clarence: For 25 years you were good neighbors, and for the last 7 or so years you have been terrible neighbors. It is like you said you were going to please the neigh- bors, and now you are saying the sae ighbors be damned. Eyler: The and result Should be reward enough. Mohror: Ray can discuss this with staff. Ken: There could be efficiencies to putting them side by side at the NE and, Eyler: I will talk with Tom Mogren -about it. Carolyn: We want to get back to having a good neighbor. 3.Dike ee survey: elevations - : Mohror: We could take a survey along the South side of Y g large lagoon. Water Utility will not raise dikes in the rear future. But if we can notg e t a permit we will have no place to put the lime . Carolyn. • We are not blocking your permit, but we want a permanent plan we can live with. • Let us get it corrected now and do it right. This is something we will have Clarence: g to live with. • we assume the to of dike is equal 811 the way around? Is the aim to have Ken: Can P it the same? • e ed the dike higher to the North because that is where the lime comes in, Mohror . You neIs builds up there.9 and then flattens out* 4. Particulate monitoring: Mohror: Mr. Peter Kischel is from the St.. Paul Health Dept,, and is also an individual contractor. The WU is having him do testing. Kischel. (Showed 8 • picture of sound monitor) We are setting up a sound monitor at vari- ous sits. P e We set u the meter and run it a full day until 4:30 P . M. It monitors background sound in area. Once work starts we Will do it again and see how much noise • noise regulations. L10 and L50 levels cannot exceed 6 goes up, and if we violate any g affects monitor. We out of an hour** It depends on we a the r , or wind over 12 mph a min. will put information together and report on it. Poohs? Norm: Arm big plans for South lagoons? and into the Mohror: west of lagoons we have done some work in ditch dredging, Pump lagoon to dry. We have to clean out the basin near Roselawn probably summer of 89. until spring to get background information and noise le l�ip the 1. Apar tic �ls. We will test off and on p � . to monitor i s set up on Wiest t of small lagoons , and one . to the middle on South side of No ula th la itis being used, about 6 ft. high. _ r goon. A PM 10 monitor Monitors or will be left there for a number of years. WU owns the monitor on South side Filter paper fits on late, is fiber glass, and this is char4ed every of North lagoon. Fil p pe P g and wei hed. Then it is analyzed to see how much lime is there 21,, hours, vacuumed out and what heavy metal its in it. ? Carol a: Will you run to sts on any me taZg found. y Ki •schel. i have - ve started to check into this. There are no results ret. : Mohror: I am assured that whoever answers phones will have 5. Night phone numbers have instruction sheet works d proper instructions if arty neighbors phone in* We will �Rogera call Ro or Carl Streed if they cannot answer quest on. up for phone people so they o tion timi : Mohror: We want the Wall and screening not to be delayed ed and 6 • C onstruc � o ahead. WU has specifications now. We can have them that excavation permit would g Skillman simultaneously. The wall behind 4 homes on Skill requires vires that we fill run together - out into lagoon, so contractor will have to till in first. They will have to pretty much go simultaneous. t? Carolyn: When 'do you think this work will sty' will pro o our f idle st. When we get the permit we p Mohror: WU has agreed to cooperate t 15 and ould refer the excavationMay teed to do the work. I w prefer to begin no later then 1 It takes 2 months to, advertise for contract. 2 weeks beyond and that to get maybe May . it in order. - • o As art of our application for permit we are 7. Iarge lagoon restoration. Mohror: P he WU cannot give ��ng 8 good effort to do a restoration screening around homes. T yet, We have to know how the 2 d ike s will be arr- ow an exact answer on restoration ye a the South Bide of large ground cover n aged first. The WU has in mind to gut in gr . . Page 3 December 19, 1985 Advisory Committee YAOting lagoon when 'we are through working with the 2 lagoons to North. Colleen: How about Roselawn? until this work is • Ramsey Co. will be widening Roselawn and we have to wait Mohror. y done. g. Pine tree plantings..- west of small lagoons: Mohror: I had ny assistant go out and - look at this area. On West edge of property there is no room for trees. We are deal West of railroad for holding ponds, but it is not accomplished. ing with buying property es � 8 and planting of trees by fall of 8.9. We will be using The wall will be built in 19 9, P ill do vibration . a bulldozer on South side of large lagoon to fill in lagoon. We w to st Ing before ore work is done , and monitor also during work. Mohror: We h _ 9, Paving and haul road oiling have paved the portion in from Roselawn . he rest of the road in the spring when weather permits. and also Co. Rd B. and will oil � y Asphalt paving done b Roselawn and 8. Any material on tires would drop off and this t. Road will be oiled before any work is done. would be swept. 10. Misc: Sylvan St. holding pond* Ken; A permit was granted for a year. Pond . P d into a nuisance . A fence may have to be erected in must be kept clean and not turns wit as to what happens time. We f eel it` is covered pretty well, and we will revie during the year. (.Ken gave me a copy of the permit.) Date of next meeting discussed* bl.3-c hearing on permit? Do we need the Advisory Kens When can we schedule the pu on Horth Committee to meet first to agree lagoon, or shall we take this up in public hearing? o wanted us to work out these items in this Committee so Carolyn. We understood you . when the public bearing came there would not be a big controversy* . anxious to et going on this .and get it settled. Mohror. We are g you a month ago and told you at that time Carolyn: The Advisory Committee met with Y g W discussed � sin the .North area was unacceptable. e the present plan for the 2 lagoon go a month ago you knee a couple of alternatives s and asked you to check on this. , g thisP lan was unacceptable to the Neighbors. Next meeting set for January 18, 19890 Notes taken & prepared by: Carolyn Peterson January 18, 1989, Meeting of Advisory Committee at Maplewood City Hall Present: Ray Eyler, John Nowak, Bill Engman, Carolyn Peterson, Roger Mohror, Norm Anderson, Ken Haider, Gary Bastian, George Rossbaeh. Ray Eyler, Chair. The minutes of the December 19, 1988) mee thng were approved. Mohror: The neighbors had asked about the lagoon and ponds being put in at the large lagoon, and objected to the p©nd further to the South. We have had an alternative plan drawn up for your approval. ( New plan shown to committee.) The road on top of the South dike VoU*1d be used for maintenance by WU, and would not be a haul road. There Would be no exit on �Loselawn of trucks, only on County -Road B. The main exit and entry road, we believe, will be on B, because that is where the excavation work will take place . Carolyn: Can you show me on the drawing where the trucks will cross over to new dike? Mohror: We are not just sure where the main cross-over will be. They are going to take down the existing dike and move it over. We will use that material to construct the new dike. we will tell the contractor to only use the road close to the corner near the houses while they are doing the work on South side of the large lagoon. Haider:' Loaded trucks will come in on the North end on Co. B and should stay as far North a aos sible . This whould help the traffic near houses. P o be a 2 year ro a et starting this summer, ' 89. _Mohror. Relocation of the dike would y p � , We would get i way this sumer and finish next year. Nowak:, The Last time you excavated on South end, the sludge settled and slid. Mohror: Yes, the lime is unstable on that end. Norms Do slashed hed lines on South end. of lagoon indicate the new wall & road? (Mohror: Yes.) Would the lagoons proposed be large enough for future nee dsy Mohr 6r: dr: We envision that with the centrifuge this should take care of our future needs. The centrifuge has been pretty successful. It has ran the last 5 days with- out any discharge. s char e . If we do not put it out there we do not have to haul it away. We x ill be combiningcontracts on the wall and excavation in one contractor so there will be co-ordination. Nowak: They will start up work at the same time on both projects? Mohror. Work s g • k hould begin on everything at one time. I can give you some information on the testing pr o# ram. The first of particulate meters is set up just North of Rose— lawn. The one behind homes on large lagoon needs a pole to be set up first. It will be just Ea s t of Rice home. When we go in to do the work we will have to have releases from every "resident to work on their property. What happens if we cannot get per- mission? Carolyn: I think we have talked with most neighbors and they approve. . y door to door and et neighbors to sign releases. Ray. Best way probably is to god r � where • Would there be an advantage to have a mass signup? If you had a meeting Haider . everyone could talk about it and ask que sti ons , and if a few people were not there you could contact them individually* o about Rays One que tion is to your knowledge, do all of the people in your area know s , the work that will be going on'' one The have not all been to meetings, and do not all get the Carolyn. Not every Y minutes of these meetings. . the easements alongwith notice of the meeting to every resi- Gary. You could send out it dent before meeting, and they could talk with neighbors about . Mohror: When can we set the meeting for Fla ening Co s s ion? • da cancelled Jan. meeting , and next one is Feb. 6. It Haider: Martin L. King holiday could go to City Council on Feb. 13. of Jan. to schedule tea ighbors meeting about the easements the end Mohror: I will try or first few days of Feb. Gary: I need an update on the insurance claims. Mohror. • WU agreed to serve as a clearing agent to take requests to the insurance co. o the contractor and the insurance co. denied the claims. for � Gary: What is left for them then? Mohror: Courts. I wish we had a better answer. Page 2 January 18, 1989 meeting of Advisory Committee Gary: It is a liability question. The policy should change with the new contract. Mohror: We hold the contraftor totally liable for any damages, public and private. (A discussion of whether new lagoons will. meet future needs.) As fear as we know, the new lagoons should be large enough to meet the needs. It is the . WU intention to move its operations away from the homes area, and to go to the NE . end of large lagoon. If we were to clean out the small ponds we would use them for water holding, but that is not in the m'ear future . We Will try to do what we can. (There was a Suggestion that proposed property W of railroad be used for lime aludge and old small sludge ponds be used for water holding.). The City of Maplewood is against this approach for lime sludge, and Dean's and Zittel' s have asked that the property not be used for lime sludge. Ken: The eost of doing that would be excessive. Nowak: Explain to me what will happen before the meeting with neighbors. Mohror: We are going to have City Attorney draw up a release form and send or hand deliver it be f ore the meeting so that at the meeting they will understand what it is about. Releases will go from the house E of Rice residence, and then S on Jackson. Meeting adjourned. 1 ii nute s taken and prepared by: Carolyn Peterson 4 Planning Commission - - MinuteS. 2-6-89 Commissioner Cardinal �_-oded Ayes --A,., , Ayers, lBarrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischery Signmundik, Sletten C. Conditional Use Permit: Rose1awn Ave. (St. Paul Water Utility) ted the staff Ken Haider. Director of Public Works, presented n Engineer for the � reort. Roger Moore, Water Productio Ciry of St. Paul Water Utilityd , discu�sethe conditjons of the staff report with the commissioners, ~ John Nowak, 91 East Skillman, discussed the damages ' incurred by homes in the neighborhood due to abuses by the contractor and he asked for assistance in collectinp for these damages. ' Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution based on the ` findings required by code and the following: 1 The use is in conf�rmity with the ��ity's ^ d - comprehensive plan and with the purpose an standards of this chapters ld maintenance of the use wou 2 The establishment or ma '~ ~ not be detrimental to the health, sc-fety, or general welfare. 30 uwouldbe located, designed, maintained and operated t b be compatible with the character of ihat zoning district. 4.0 The use WOUld not depreciate property vialues. 5^ The use would not he hazardousv detrimental, or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smokev dust, odor, fumes, water (pollution, water runoff, ��ibration, ' general unsightlinessv electrical inter+erence, or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traf+ic on I ocal streets and shall not create traffic congestic»nv unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area prope*rties. l� be ��r�i�e� �� essential public ^� 7F��wr ���e ���»� ° ' - - - - services, such as streets, police, f i�� protection, , Planning Commission Minutes 2-6-89 A andutilities° schoolsv and parkss. 8 would not create excessive addi�ional The use *vou -��-zubl'�c ^ ��st fmr public +acilities requirements - p -- -- d ould not be detrimental to the a�d services, �n w welfare of the City. 90 The use would preserve and incorporate tr`� site's natural and scenic features into the development design` 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental � effects. . . Approval is subject to the following conditions , 1, Compliance with Article X, material extraction and hauling ordinance. Adherence to the site plans for dike construction and screening~ 3. The top of any dike shall be at or below the elevation of the present dike. 4~ Dike construction shall be'accomplish ed starting on the north and proceeding southerly. 5 Installation of the screening shall begin before or ^ other rk wo . concurrently with �nScreening shall be replaced as deemed necessary by Cit--,-' staff. he 6 Noise from any equipment, machines, or other ^ permitted from 7 a m to 5 p m., Monday activity is perm ^ ^ ^ - Saturday through Friday. No noise is permitted��n , Sunda.v, or legal holidays. 7 Dust shall be controlled on and off the site ^ ut i l iz ing the +x:ol l owing techniques or whatever other ��t to avoid a nuisance: ������� maybe appropriate as Sweep'paved areas on an d �f� site with a pick up ��p� 1�wowe�� mor on aregu]ar basin�^ l � � oiled d or treated w/i th a b ~ Unpaved -roads �h� � � � wetting omgwp,+ such as calcium chloride as needed to control dust* ' c ' Other dust control trol measures may be employed for specific act ivit imVs ' Planning Commission Minutes -b-89 Umm Conduct a particulate monitoring program of Iong duration to establish background levels prior to commencing operations and continuing monitor, throughout the time there is activity on the site, The results of* this program will be made aVa 11 abl e for review on a regular basis. If specific qt..testio*ns arise concerning this program the util ity, at their ex,pense,-will . contract * with an independent testing firm to verify results. 90 The Litility shall engage an independent test inc.; firm to conduct a vibration monitoring program. This prograrrn shal I establish back -'ground vibration level s recommend reasonable vibration standards based on accepted industry criteria, and monitor vibration dUrin�Li activities on the site to insure compliances City staff shall be teept aware of and agree with the evaluat'ion of the vibration* c.) The Util itY shall provide a contact person or persons that has the authority to resolve problems and is available to address citizen concernse 1.1. All written material and plans submitted with the Lttility-'s application are part of the permit unless specifically altered by these conditions. 1990 construction plans shall be laid out at the time of the permit renewals Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--A,,,.*.dahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer Sigmundik Sletten Elm Code Amendment: Zoning Initiation The staff report was presented and discussed with the commissioners. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance which revises the definition of effected property owners to mean only the owners of the property to be rezonedq rather than the property owners within 200 feets Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--Axdahl s Ayers ., Barrett 9 Cardinal I hemp seyq Fiola, Fischer,, Sigmundik I Sletten MEMORANDUM ' TO: City Manager FROM: Planning Intern Robert Generous SUBJECT: Street Vacat ion LOCATION: Cope Avenue and Duluth Street APPLICANT: Peter J. Schmelz and City Staff DATE: January 31,.19a9 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.The applicant isrequesting vacation ofthe Cope Avenue and Duluth Street right-of-ways abutting his property for additional land. 2. City Staff is requesting the vacation of the remainder of the unimproved stre6t right-of-ways for Cope Avenue and Elul th Street. (See Attachment 2^) CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Chapter 412.851 of state law states that "Council may, by resolution, vacate any street . . . if it appears in the public interest to do so DISCUSSION The Cope Avenue and Duluth Street right-of-ways are not needed for area traffic circulation, nor to provide access for any of the abutting properties. These properties are serviced by the frontage road or Atlantic Street. If these properties are returned to private ownership, then they may be better maintained and used by the adjoining property owners. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the resolution on Attachment 3 to vacate those portions of the Cope Avenue and Duluth Street rights-of-way requested by the applicant, subject to the following condition: Retention forautility easement of the south thirty feet of the west 110 feet of Block 14 and the south thirty +eet of the east thirty feet of Block 15 and the north 157 feet of the east thirty feet of the east 255 feet of B]ock 10, all in Clifton Addition. 2. Approve the resolution on Attachment 4 which vacates the unimproved Cope Avenue and Duluth Street rights-of-way requested by staff, subject to the following conditions: an Retention of a utility easement over the north 45 feet of the Cope Avenue right-of-way between the west right-of-way line of Atlantic Street and the center line of Duluth Street. b, Retention of a utility easement over the westerly fifteen feet of the east half of the northerly 127 feet of the Duluth Street right-of-way, south of the south right-of-way line for Cope Avenue. Approval is in the public interest because: 1. The City has no plans to improve these streets. 2. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 3. These street segments are not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access. 4. The properties can be better maintained and used if returned to private ownership. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff sent neighborhood surveys toproperty cwnerswithin350 feet of the street vacation proposed by Mr. Schmelz. Of the three surveys sent, one was in favor and one opposed. The person opposed stated that the the City should vacate the entire Cope Ayenue and Duluth Street right-of-ways. The whole unused street can be vacated and the adjacent property owners would take better care of the area. REFERENCE DESCRIPTION Or RIGHT-OF-WAY � Duluth Street is a unimproved sixty -+cot -wide right -o+ -way with a ' water main 12 feet west and parallel tothe street center line. Cope Avenue is a unimproved sixty -foot -wide right -o+ -way, except the easterly 230 feet which is 63 feet wide, with awater main 12 feet north and parallel to the street center line. Both ° right-of-ways have sanitary sewers at the street center line. LAND USES SURROUNDING DULUTH STREET North: Countryside Volkswagom and Embers Restaurant East: Apartment buildings South: Single -dwelling residences West: Menards PUBLIC WORKS The public works department does not foresee future construction of Cope Avenue or Duluth Street in this area. mb\bgschmel Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Resolution 4. Resolution 91 PAIJrI CR � f3�3 -T W N R 7R L� ,� AV `'7� � o (1) CpNNOR AV g V DE— MON BR00 a o N . N gpOoKs� p c3 � � Q � SEXTANT X f' P } IIZ GERVAIS AV ----- a = v RANOVIEW �n PKWY m VIKING M RR A Ki G diiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillIlIllillIlilljllllllllllllllllI -_---_- N T COPE P E AV COPE C Keller Lake � � LARK � N a � 1 � a o RD B� � � LAURIE Q CO Q RD � SAND- HURST 25 CrI.ELAND Z \1moo Q JUNCTION ST J o �i VR Q gURKE o . ,� � P ��� �£ AV 0� (I) CHAMBERS ST AV N ELORIOG E 3 J Qv 8 F'W Q Z M q Q BE l AV, na S►ct �- � a x yE AV ? SKILIMAN AV o AV V RYAN / RY- N A/ nC � A, N Vf Q N � � J J dop FROST a now� F- N h N m W 14 60/27 1N WFEN V! TON AV f - S ME R AV W S LOCATION MAP ' 4 Attachment 1 lA(005. •c I (1.'17 ems•} Toit I = 1.5.. 313 C 'ti v�� " " I t �T�Zi.�b' Aete�• -- 201:0 .40 -- — N I 17' I dA I 3bPir t-t5l CIS In �. ' Excs ss 4ak' " 1200 Cn rg 'I 6 r- !4 .L 1180 �z� •�� 1233 dw ! rw J Ga opo ,. 110 ' _ Z 9 0' 40 ' � , - " ... . . .. . .' • : l` .•. .%• .moi i i • •.'�'`ii • ` • �. l:..i •' :•:: i •�•i i �• •• Ali :•i ::i . O 4C s .bbac t,ls1� 7)1 r E�,I 1 .,�• v opo 6 17 i t� ( t ' 2 5 20 + 7 28 2 a.a i 1 i ! ; I I - 255' - � N •�' _ 2266 ' 2,275 � -v 2280,1 •C �pt �i If 10! � a l -7 a' + 2 I40 40 b �i 3 .1 o :.. 2 JR 0 At■ ■-■ ■ ■r5 2254 ... �. LARK ' � Z 1 � D 40 4p 'Np7—JM- 1 i 7 S 5 �' � 1 � Ila i ( .� -.r o7a (4� •� ��*1T is i ?•� I 5 ; 26 T 2�s 129 . 1J -- - — •� - — - — — OWN�,. , T -, 1= 1 I 1 Street vacation proposed by' Affir/A/M Street vacation proposed by staff : • • •.�: PROPERTY LINE 5 / ZONING MAP Attachment 2 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of v 1989, at 7 p.m. The fol I owing members were present: The +ol I owing members were absent: WHEREAS, Peter J. Schmelz initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the +ollowing-described property: The South thirty feet of the West 110 feet of Block 14 and the South thirty feet of the East thirty feet of Block 15 of the unimproved Cope Avenue right-of-way, and the North 157 feet of the East thirty feet of the East 255 feet of Block 10 of the Duluth Street right-of-way. WHEREAS, the procedUral history o . + this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on , 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be . 3. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1989 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above-described street'right-of- ways, public interest in the property will accrue to the following_ described abutting properties: Subject -to easements the following West 110 ft. of Blocks 14 and 17 and East 240 feet of Blocks 15 and 16. Part of FOL tracts SELy of. Hwys. 36 and 61 EX S 100 ft. part of SW 1/4 N of CO RD B part of SE 1/4 W of Clifton Addn. S of L 107 FT I N of S L of Blk 15 SD ADD extended and N of Heinemann's Bel leview and in Clifton Add" EX E 240 FT BLKS 15 and 16 and EX E 255 FT Block 10 also the W 225 FT of E 255 FT of N 30 FT of %)LK 10 EX N 30 FT & EX S 174 FT the W 225 FT of E 255 FT of Blc»ck 10, all in C|ifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota. � Attachment 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: I a The City has no pl ans to improve these streets. 2. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 3, These street segments are not needed for area traffic cirCulation or emergency vehicle arcess. - . 4 The properties can be better maintained and used if returned to private ownership. Thisvezation is subject to the retention of the South thirty feet of the West 110 feet of Block 14 and the South thirty feet of the East thrity fest of Block 15 and the North 157 feet of the East thirty feet of the East 255 feet of Block 10, all in Clifton Addition. Adopted this day of I 1989a STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ' COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS. ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1989 with the original on fi1s in my office and the same is e full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to vacation of , Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1989. City Clerk City of Maplewood , Minnesota 7 Pursuant todue call and notice therxeof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council chambers in said City on the day of v 1989, at 7 p.m" The following members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, the Cit. of Maplewood initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following -described property: The Cope Avenue right-of-waybetween the west right-of-wayline of Atlantic Street and the center line of Duluth Street, and the unimproved northerly 127 feet of the East half of the Duluth Street right -of -way, south of the south right-of-way line of Cope *venue, WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on ' 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be 2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1989 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above-described , public interest in the property will accrue to the following -described abutting properties: The East 290 feet of W 400 ft. of Blocks 14 and 17. Subject to Rds. the South 200 ft. of E 260 ft. of Block 14" N 1/2 of vac. alley adj. and Lots 16 through 30, Block 11. All in Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above-described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: in The City has no plans to improve these streetsm 2a The adjoining properties have.adequate street accesso 3a These street segments are not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access. � Attaohment4 4 a The properties can be better maintained amd used if returned to private ownership. This vacation is subject to the following: ' ` a. Retention of a utility easement over the North 45 feet of the Cope Avenue right-of-way between the West right- of-way line of Atlantic Street and the center line of Duluth Street. b. Retention of a utility easement over the westerly fifteen feet of the East half of the 'northerly 127 feet of the Duluth Street right-of-way, south of the South right -o+ -way I ine + or Cope Avenue. Ir . Adopted this day of , 1989. Seconded by Ayes -- Jig - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY } GS. ' ) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned , being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certi-fy that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the day of , 1989 with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there+rom insofar as the same relates to vacation of ^ Witness my hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 1989. ^ -,� City Cl erk City of Maplewood, Minnesota Planning Commission -2- Minutes 2-6-89 VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Street Vacation: Cope Ave. & Duluth St The staff report was presented. Peter Schmelz, the applicant, was present at the meeting and discussed his request with the commissioners. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: 1 l o� the resolut^'on to vacate those portions ^ Approval of the Cope Avenue and Duluth Street rights-of-way - ' following requested b�/ the applicant, subject to the f o req condition: Retention for a utility easement of the south thirty feet of the west 110 feet of Block 14 a`- d the south thirty feet of the east thirty feet of Block 15 and the north 157 feet of the e~� thirty -feet of the east 255 feet of Block JC)l all in Clifton Additions 2 Approval of the resolution which vacates the ' unimproved Cope Avenue and Duluth Street rights-of- way requested by staff, subject to the following conditions: a. Retention of a utility easement over the north 45 feet of the Cope Avenue right-of-way between the west right-of-way line of Atlantic Street and the center line of Duluth Streets b. Retention of a utllity easement over the westerly fifteen feet of the east half of the northerly 127 feet of the Duluth Street right- c»f-way, south of the south right-of-way line for Cope Avenue. Approval is in the public: interest because: 1. The City has no plans to improve these streets~ 2, The adjoining properties have adequate street accesse not needed -For ���� 3s These street segments are traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access. Planning Commission -3- Minutes 2-6-89 4. The properties can be better maintained and used if returned to private ownership. C;ommissioner Sletten seconded Ayes��dah1vAyers, Barrett, Cardinal, l a Dempsey, ��i o , Fischer, Sigmundik, Sletten B~ Variance: Crestview Dr. (Schlangen) Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Ronald was present at the meetinp. Schlangen, the applicant, Commissicmer Ayers moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution approving a 20 -foot setback variance from the Battle Creek ordinary high water markn based on the findings that: 1 Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because e ^ th storm sewer storm on the westerly side of the site prevents the house from being placed in such a manner to meet all setback requirements. A. ^ The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance since all conditions would - be required to be met relative to erosion control ° water quality management, building grade placement and tree replacement. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall submit the following plans for spprowal �y ��e City Engineer: 1 A detailed orading and drainage plan indicating ^ exd r`�des e existing and proposed grades. The elevation of th lowest floor shall not be lower than 918. 2 A detailed water management and erosion control PI ~ ^ indicating the proposed procedure +or construction and showing how the slope would be stabilized during constructic»n. 3. A tree replacement plan ' indicating the replacement of trees to a density of ten trees per acres MEMORANDUM Amtion bY01 TO: City Manager FROM: DirectorofCommunity Developm nt fi—��~��- SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Zoning Initiation --~�-~� ]� DATE: January 25, 1989 -'~ _~~��~�~�~�' Dat INTRODUCTION Staff is requesting an amendment to the zoning code that would delete the requirement for a petition of surrounding property owners to apply for an amendment to the zoning code, including rezonings. The zoning code currently requires that a rezoning application include a petition signed by at least 50% of the property owners within 200 feet of the property to be rezoned, unless it is initiated by the City. If the rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan, staff will initiate the rezoning, thereby avoiding the petition requirement. E1.11* SCU&3S-I ON The current petition requirement has served no purpose. The f the petition i t id the time d �x ense of purpose o e pe on s o avo e e an p processing an application and holding a hearing if a rezoning is not supported b at least 50% f the surrounding property owners y eas o g within 200 feet of the property to be rezoned. While there are only one or two requests each year to waive the petition requirement, the City has never denied a request, even when the surrounding property owners have opposed the waiver. The most recent example occurred on December 12, when the City Council waived the petition requirement for Amoco Oil to apply for a rezoning at the southeast corner of White Bear and 11th Avenues. Amoco Oil could not get a petition signed because of neighborhood opposition. Several neighbors appeared at the meeting to oppose the waiver~ Council , however, felt that a hearing should be held. If the petition is not going to be used, it should be eliminated to save staff time in preparing a report on the waiver request, Council time in hearing the request, and the applicant's time in trying to get the necessary signatures. A petition of surrounding property owners is not required for a rezoning application in most cities" Staff surveyed the 20 cities closest to Maplewood in size and found that only New Brighton, which is a relatively developed city, requires such a petition. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance which revises the definition of effected property owners to mean only the owners of the property to be rezoned, rather than the property owners within 200 feet. GOMEMOZONE ORDINANCE NO* AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE PETITION REQUIREMENTS FOR A REZONING THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.Sections 36-481and 36-482are amended as follows (deletions are crossed c�and additions are underlined): Section 36-491. Initiating.,-Generallys An amendment to this chapter, including an amendment to the zoning map, may be initiated by the city council ° the planning commission, the city staff or by petition of affected property owners, who are hereby defined to be the owners of the propert.y. to be rezoned An amendment not initiated by the planning commission shall be referred to the planning commission mission for study and report and may not be acted upon by the city council until it has received the recommendation of the planning commission on the proposed amendment or until sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date of reference of the amend- ment without a report by the planning commission. (Code 1965, Subsections 915.0109 915.020; Ord. No. 238, Subsection 4, 4-18- 68) Section 36-482. Same --Petition of affected property owners. The director of community development shall , upon petition o+ the oviners of the _property to be rezo fift *58*-PerezML change- fix a date for a hearing. Such petition shall be accompanied by an abstractor's certificate showing the names and addresses of all property owners within three hundred fifty (350) feet f28ef'-feeL of the property to be rezoned._S"eh-pctiL*urr-and The Petition and certif icate shall be filed with the director of community development and shall be accompanied by a completed application form and payment of a fee to defray the expenses of advertisingv public hearing and other expenses incurred by the City in the handling of the petition. The amount 0f such fee shall be imposed, set, established and fixed by the City Council, by resolution, +romo time to time. (Code 1965, Subsection 915.010) Section 2. This ordinance shall take.effect upon its passage and publication. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes-- Mayor - -r Planning Commission Minutes 2-6-89 8 Conduct a particulate monitoring program of long ^ duration to establish background levels prior to commencing operations and continuing monitor throughout the time there is activityon the site. The -results of this proqram will be made available for review on a regular basis. If specific questions arise concerning the utility this program , at their expense, will contract with an independent testing firm to verify r'esults. 9 The .tility shall engage an independent testing firm ^ to c�~~duct a vibration monitoring program. This pro ='- m shall establish background vibration levels, recommend reasonable vibration standards based on accepted industry criteria, and monitor vibration durinL:'i activities on the site to insure compliance. City staff shall be kept aware of and agree with the evaluation of the vibration. 10 The utilitv shall provide a contact person or ^ pe'��ons that has the aUthority to resolve problems ` and is available to address citizen concerns. 11 All written material and plans submitted with the ^ utility's application are part o4 the permit unless specficaly altered by these conditions. 1990 construction plans shall be laid out at the time of the permit renewals Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes--Axdahl , Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal , Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, Sigmundik° Bletten D~ Code Amendment: Zoning Initiation The staffreport waspresented and discussed with the commissi ' ers. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance 'which revises the definition of effected property owners to mean only the owners o+ the property to be rezoned v' rathewr^ than the property owners within 200 +eoet . Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes-~~Axdm:hl v Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal v Dempsey, Fiol a , Fischep v Sigmundik , S] ett^sn Planning Commission 4M-7- >1inutes 2-6-89 , Adopt Rules of Procedure The Commission discussed and revised the Rules 0F . y,rocedure. . Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning C . ission table ' 0 oa this item until taff researches other City commissions Rules of Procedure regarding absence/removal cl'auses. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes--AxdahlAye rs, Barrett, Cardinal, Dempsey, Fiola, Fischer, SiqMundik, Sletten � F. Elect Vice -Chairperson ' Commissioner Cardinal mowed the Planning Commission ^ recommend that Lorraine Fischer be reappointed as vice- ' - chairperson. ` ��'mmis��ione. Sigmundik eeconded Ayes--Axdah\ v Ayers, Commissioner Barrett, Cardinal v Dempsey, Fiola, Finschery Sigmundikv. Sletten VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Annual Report The annual report was discussed. Commissioner Fischer move Planning ann d the ing Commission accept the annual report, declare Mr. ��oins' position vacant and 'thorize staff to advertise +or a replacement" � - Ayers �'�e���o^hl ' Commissioner Barrett seconded , , Barrett, Cardinal , Dempseey v Fiu»] a " Fischer, Sigmundik , Sletten Ix, COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS -A. Council Meet i ng' -January 23, 1989x Frank Dempsey P. Representative +or the February 13 Council Meeting: Bob Cardinal , . . ' _ . . ° � AGENDA ITEM � . AGENDA REPORT Action byv ' ` � TO: CityManager Endorse _ Modif ied.�~�~�~_� FROM: Assistant City Engineer Rejected SUBJECT: Gervais Avenue, English Street to MN/DOT Drivewav"= Project 88-14--Award of Bid . DATE: February 21, 1989 Attached is a letter of recommendation of award of bid from the project engineer and tabulation of bids for project 88-14. It is recommended that the attached resolution of award of bid to ' Danner, Inc. be adopted. BAI ' jo Attachments ' y i i T.OLTZ, KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-1893 612.-'292-4400 FAX 612/292-0083 December 3 0, 1988 Mr. Bruce Irish, Assistant City Engineer City of iia p I ew cod 1830 East County Road .6 Maplewood,, Minnesota 55109 Re: Gervais Avenue Improvements, City Project 88-14 Ma p I ewood, Minnesota Com m i s's i o n No,- 9279 Dear Mr. Irish: The bid openi ng for the referenced project was held at 9:00 AM, Wednesday, December 21, 1988. The following Is a I i st i ng of bids received: Co ntr act o Danner, Inc. $285,243.1 0 Forest Lake Contracting $303,03284.7 3 Lametti & Sons, Inc. $307,951 .00 C. W. HouI e, I na, $308,238.31 Rice Lake Contracting $308,408.11 Richard Knutson, Inc. $308,800.7 3 Shafer Contracting $313,281o90 Total Asphal t Const. $316,965.85 Austin P. Ke I ler Const. $318,423.0 0 Lake Area Ut i I i ty $320,134.26 0 & P Contracting $323,440.50 F. M. Frattai one $326,083.7 0 Hoist Excavating $331,166.00 Albrecht Excavating $334,156950 Northwest Asphalt $338,47 0.50 Alexander Construction $353,260.51 Carl Bol ander & Sons $356,v609950 Progressive Contractors $357.9537,a20 Engineer's Estimate $330,243.00 It is recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder Danner, Inc,,., In the amount of $285,243.10. A copy of the tabulation of bids In enc! osed. Sincerely yours, Larry D. Rohrer, P. E. LDB:adh j GERV A I S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 MAPL EWOOD, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 9279 BIDS OPENED: DECPI BER 21, 1988 9:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER MSA INELIGIBLE 1 REM. DI SP EX 18 X 16 FM TEE ETC 2 REM EXISTING MANHOLE 3 CONN TO EXISTING MANHOLE 4 CONN TO EXIST 6" SERVICE PIPE 5 611 PVC SCH 40 SERVICE C/O 6 611 PVC SCH 40 SS SERVICE PIPE 7 811 PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 8 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 0-101 DEPTH 9 1211 PVC SDR 35 SS 10-121 10 12f1 PVC SDR 35 SS 12-141 11 12" PVC SDR 35 SS > 141 12 121' DIP CL 50 SJ SS PLAN D E PTH 13 1511 PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 14 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE 16 41 DIA MANHOLE 0-101 DEPTH 17 EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE > 101 18 - 12t1 OUTSIDE DROP Ill 1 I :.j!_: : L.___.._II111 1L 11fILl L,U1111tL.1:11L, L _l:Ll ._fit d11.l1__.' ll. :I I: .:.. I.: 1.1 ... 1__. PAG E 1 TOL TZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENG I NEI` -ARCH I TECTS-PLANNERS TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error In this I i ne on original bid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DANNER, INC. FOREST LAKE CONTR. LAMETT 1 8 SONS, INC. QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 .00 LS 1.00 LS 3.00 EA 1.00 EA 1.00 EA 45.00 LF 235.00 LF 290.00 LF 280.00 LF 250.00 LF 650.00 LF 20.00 LF 170.00 LF 1755.00 LF 45.00 TN 6.00 EA 11.50 LF 1.00 LS DIVISION 1 1- WATERMA I N- MSA INELIGIBLE 1 WET TAP, INCL TEE AND GV 2.00 EA 2 811 DIP CLASS 52 WATERMA I N 110.00 LF 3 CONN TO EXIST 811 W ATERMA I N 1.00 LS DIVISION III - STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 121' RC PIPE SEWER CL V 2 1511 RC P 1 PE S EW ER CL V 3 18/1 RC P I PE SEW ER CL V 4 241t RC P I PE SEWER CL 5 2.1 X 31 BOX CATCH BAS IN 6. CATCH BASIN (MANHOLE) AS DET 7 24" RC PIPE CULVERT CL IV 8 24" RC PIPE APRON 9 5111 SPAN RC PIPE ARCH CULVERT 10 5111 SPAN RC PIPE ARCH APRON 11 REM/REPL 12" VCP SS 12 POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 13 RANDOM RIP RAP CL 11 14 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 15 COARSE FILTER AGG FOR BEDDING 104.00 LF 162.00 LF 280.00 LF 141.00 LF 2.00 EA 5.00 EA 132.00 LF 2.00 EA 254.00 LF 2.00 EA 31.00 LF 32.00 LF 10.00 CY 45.00 SY 60.00 CY 3500.00 3,500.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 900.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 10.00 450.00 13.00 3,055.00 22.00 6,380.00 24.00 6,720.00 26.00 6,500.00 28.00 18,200.00 25.00 500.00 24.00 4,080.00 1.00 1,755.00 10.00 450.00 1100.00 6,600.00 80.00 920.00 2000.00 2,000.00 62,710.00 2000.00 4 , 000.00 18.00 1 ,980.00 4000'00. 400.00 ------------ 6,380.00 15.00 1,560.00 17.00 2,754.00 19.00 5,320.00 24.00 3,384.00 850.00 _ 1,700.00 1000.00 5,000.00 30.00 3,960.00 600.00 1,200.00 70.00 17,780.00 800.00 1,600.00 25.00 775.00 20.00 640.00 45.00 450.00 3.00 135.00 15.00 ------------ 900.00 62.00 47,158.00 4200.00 4,200.00 400.00 - 400.00 400.00 1,200.00 100.00 100.00 300.00 300.00 14.00 630.00 14.00 3,290.00 13.50 3,915.00 13.90 3 , 892.00 16.00 4,000.00 16.80 10, 920.00 75.00 1o500.00 17.00 2,890.00 1.30 2,281.50 14.00 630.00 965.00 5,790.00 62.00 713.00 2000.00 2p000.00 48,651 .50 2300.00 4,600.00 20.00 20200.00 125.00 125.00 ------------ 6,925.00 22.75 20366.00 22.75 3,685.50 22.75 6,370.00 25.10 3,539.10 .550.00 1,100.00 890.00 4,450.00 31 ;90 4,210.80 600.00 1,200.00 83.00 21 ,082.00 1050.00 2,100.00 32.00 992.00 11.60 371.20 40.00 400.00 2.50 112.50 14.00 840.00 52,819.10 3805.00 3,805.00 428.00 428.00 267.50 802.50 320.00 320.00 305.00 305.00 12.65 569.25 12.61 2,963.35 16.11 4,671 .90 16.44 4,603.20 17.61 4,402.50 17.83 11 ,589.50 36.07 721.40 21.08 3,583.60 2.78 4 , 878.90 13.00 585.00 1360.00 8,160.00 95.00 1,092.50 1720.00 1 , 720.00 55,201.60 2500.00 5,000.00 24.72 2,719.20 200.00 200.00- 7,919.20 00.007,919.20 22.52 2,342.08 20.60 3,337.20 19.90 5,572.00 22.74. 3,206.34 600.00 1,200.00 1140.00 50700.00 27.26 3,598.32 500.00 10000.00 67.41 17,122.14 896.00 1,792.00 44.85 1,390.35 16.80 537.60 45.00 450.00 3.20 144.00 12.80 ------------ 768.00 ------------ 48,160.03 3000.00 3,000.00 1000.00 1..000.00 800.00 21,400.00 200.00 200.00 250.00 250.00 17.00 765.00 21.00 4,935.00 24.00 6,960.00 24.00 6,720.00 24.00 6 , 000.00 24.00 15,600.00 33.00 660.00 27.00 4,590.00 1.00 1,755.00 10.00" 450.00 1100.00 6,600.00 50.00 575.00 1700.00 1 ,700.00 . ------------ 64,160.00 3000.00 6,000.00 20.00 2,200.00 500.00 500.00 ------------ 8,700.00 22.00 - 2,288.00 23.00 3,726.00 25.00 7 , 000.00 28.00 3,948.00 600.00 119200.00 1000.00 5,000.00 31.00 4,092.00 900.00 1p800.00 70.00 17,780.00 1300.00 2,600.00 60.00 1,860.00 10.00 320.00 40.00 400.00 2.00 90.00 20.00 1,200.00 53,304.00 • GERVAI S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 MAPL EWOOD, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 9279 BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21, 1988 9:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE PAGE 2 TOL TZ, KING, DUV ALL ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENG i NE ERS- ARCH ITE CTS- PLANNERS TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error in this line on original bid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DANNER, I NC. FOREST LAKE CONTR. LAMETTI b SONS, INC. QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES 1.00 LS 3000.00 2 REM/D I SP CONC CURB & GUTTER 90.00 LF 2.00 3 REM/D I SP CHAIN LINK FENCE/POST 715.00 LF 1.00 4 REM/D I SP 24" CM CULVERT PIPE 61.00 LF 3.00 5 REM/D I SP 1811 DIP FORCEMA I N 140.00 LF 5.00 6 COMMON EXCAVATION 10014.00 CY 1.50 7 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 1546.00 CY 1.50 8 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION 115.00 CY 3.00 9 GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 10260.00 CY 4.00 10 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) 500.00 CY 8.00 11 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 5200.00 TN 8.00 12 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BINDER 43.50 TN 160.00 13 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BASE 49.30 TN 160.00 14 RECYC BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 13.00 15 RECYC BASE COURSE MIXTURE 820.00 TN 13.00 16 BIT MATERIAL FOR WEAR COURSE 54.00 TN 160.00 17 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 15.00 18 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 820.00 GA 2.00 19 CONCRETE WALK 6250.00 SF 2.00 20 CONCRETE CURB $ GUTTER B624 2480.00 LF 5.50 21 6" D I RV EWAY PAVEMENT 30.00 SY 25.00 22 BITUMINOUS CURB 340.00 LF 5.00 23 CHAIN LINK FENCE 570.00 LF 10.00 24 METAL BRACKET ASSEMBLY 3.00 EA 300.00 25 SODDING TYPE B 200.00 SY 3.00 26 SEEDING 2.00 AC 200.00 27 SEED MIXTURE NO. 500 100.00 LB - 3.50 28 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 4.00 TN 200.00 29 - COMM FERTILIZER 10-10-10 1000.00 LB 0.30 30 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 6+06 1.00 LS 1500.00 31 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 11+85 1.00 LS 1000.00 32 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX 5.00 EA 200.00 33 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE 11.80 LF 80.00 DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 PERMANENT BARR I CADES 16.00 LF 2 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW PAINT 1250.00 LF J BID SUMMATION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE D I V I -S I ON 11 WATERMA I N- MSA INELIGIBLE DIVISION I I I- STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 3,000.00 180.00 715.00 183.00 700.00 15,021.00 2,319.00 345.00 41,040.00 4,000.00 41 ,600.00 6,960.00 7,888.00 12, 090.00 10,660.00 8t640.00 13,950.00 1,640.00 12,500.00 13p640.00 750.00 1 ,700.00 5,700.00 900.00 600.00 . 400.00 350.00 800.00 300.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 944.00 213,015.00 30.00 480.00 0.40 500.00 980.00 3000.00 1.25 1.00 3.60 9.00 1.06 1.06 4.00 3.55 5.00 6.75 129.00 129.00 11.00 11.00 129.00 12.37 1.10 1.40 5.20 25.00 3.00 7.00 40.00 4.00 325.00 3.00 200.00 0.28 800.00 800.00 100.00 70.00 3,000:00 112.50 715.00 219.60 l..260.00 10,614.84 1,638.76 460.00 36..423.00 2,500.00 35,100.00 5,611.50 6,359.70 10,230.00 9,020.00 6,966.00 11,504.10 902.00 8,750.00 12,896.00 750.00 1 ,020.00 3,990.00 120.00 800.00 650.00 300.00 800.00 280.00 800.00 800.00 500.00 826.00 175,919.00 13.50 216.00 0.57 712.50 ------------ 928.50 4200.00 4,200.00 2.20 198.00 1.30 929.50 4.00 244.00 12.70 1,778.00 1.50 15,021 .00 1.50 2,319.00 3.00 345.00 4.20 43,092.00 4.50 2t250.00 6.87 35,724.00 125.00 5,437.50 125.00 6,162.50 9.45 8,788.50 9.40 7,708.00 125.00 6,750.00 16.90 15,717.00 1.20 984.00 1.26 7,875.00 4.88 12,102.40 17.00 510.00 2.75 935.00 6.65 3,790.50 36.00 108.00 3.50 700.00 140.00 280.00 2.38 238.00 125.00 500.00 0.29 290.00 2100.00 2,100.00 1800.00 1,800.00 150.00 750.00 95.00 1,121 .00 190,747.90 25.00 400.00 0.72 900.00 ------------ 1,300.00 5000.00 5,000.00 3.00 270.00 1.00 715.00 5.00 305.00 10.00 1 ,400.00 1.00 10,014.00 2.00 3,092.00 3.00 345.00 4.00 41,040.00 6.00 3,000.00 5.60 29,120.00 125.00 5,437.50 125.00 6,162.50 9.50 8,835.00 9.40 7,708.00 125.00 6,750.00 17.00 . 15,810.00 : 1,20 984.00 1.40 8,750.00 5.00 12,400.00 22.00 660.00 3.00 1,020.00 6.70 3,819.00 40.00 120.00 2.50 500.00 300.00 600.00 5.00 500.00 125.00 500.00 1.00 1,000.00 1500.00 1,500.00 1200.00 1,200.00 100.00 500.00- 100.00 1,180.00 ------------ 180s.237 .00 50.00 800.00 .0.60 - 750.00 ------------ 1,550.00 62,710.00 48,651 .50 55r201.60 64,160.00 6,380.00 6,925.00. 7,919.20 8,700.00 _ 47,158.00 52,819..10 48,160.03 53,304.00 213,015.00 175,919.00 1900747.90 180,237.00 980.00 928.50 1,300.00 1 ,550.00 330,243.00 285,243.10 303,328.73 307,951.00 . GERV A i S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 MAPL DIOOD, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 9279 BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21 , 1988 9:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE 3 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENG I NE ERS- ARCH I TE CTS- PLANNERS TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error in this I i ne on original bid C.W. HOULE, INC. RICE LAKE CONTR. RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. SHAFER CONTRACT I NG QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 REM. DI SP EX 18 X 16 FM TEE ETC 1.00 LS - 4900.00 4,900.00 4000.00 4,000.00 3119.00 30119.00 5000.00 5,000.00 2 REM EXISTING MANHOLE 1.00 LS 1400.00 1,400.00 500.00 500.00 400.00 400.00 500.00 500.00 3 CONN TO EXISTING MANHOLE 3.00 EA 500.00 1p500.00 450.00 1,350.00 524.33 1,572.99 250.00 750.00 4 CONN TO EXI ST 6" SERV I CE PI PE 1.00 EA 650.00 650.00 250.00 250.00 150.00 150.00 200.00 200.00 5 6't PVC SCH 40 SERV ICE C/O 1.00 EA 210.00 210.00 250.00 250.00 330.00 330.00 300.00 300.00 6 6" PVC SCH 40 SS SERVICE. PIPE 45.00 LF 20.00 900.00 12.00 540.00 13.36 601.20 16.00 720.00 7 8" PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 235.00 LF 19.00 4,465.00 17.80 4,183.00 9.88 2,321 .80 16.00 3,760.00 8 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 0-10 1 DEPTH . 290.00 LF 15.00 4,350.00 20.00 5,800.00 13.67 3,964.30 19.00 5,510.00 9 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 10-121 280.00 LF 17.00 4,760.00 20.00 5,600.00 15.24 4,267.20 20.00 5,600.00 10 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 12-141 250.00 LF 19.00 4,750.00 25.75 6,437.50 17.15 4,287.50 22.00 5,500.00 11 12" PVC SDR 35 SS > 141 650.00 LF 24.00 15,600.00 25.75 16,737.50 20.14 13,091 .00 24.00 15,600.00 12 12" D i P CL 50 SJ SS PL AN DEPTH 20.00 LF 28.00 560.00 31.00 620.00 21.85 4370'00 28.00 560.00 13 1511 PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 170.00 LF 20.25 3,442.50 37.90 6,443.00 18.81 31,197.70 21.00 3,570.00 14 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL 1755.00 LF 0.01 17.55 0.50 877.50 2.65 4,650.75 4.50 7,897.50 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE 45.00 TN 8.50 382.50 8.50 382.50 9.09 409.05 14.00 630.00 16 4t DIA MANHOLE 0-101 DEPTH 6.00 EA 945.00 5,670.00 1000.00 6,000.00 873.83 5,242.98- 1900.00 11p400.00 17 EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE > 101 11.50 LF 61.00 701.50 55.00 632.50 59.91 688.97 170.00 1,955.00 18 12" OUTSIDE DROP 1.00 LS 910.00 -w-w--w-wwww 910.00 1500.00 ------------ 1 ,500.00 928.00 ----w-----w- 928.00 1200.00 --w--www---- 1,200.00 55,169.05 62,103.50 49,659.44 70,652.50 DIVISION 11 - WATERMAIN - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 WET TAP, I NCL TEE AND GV 2.00 EA 2450.00 4,900.00 2650.00 5,300.00 2541.00 5,082.00 2700.00 5,400.00 2 8" DIP CLASS 52 "WATERMAIN 110.00 LF 21.50 2,365.00 20.00 2,200.00 15.87 1,745.70 20.00 2,200.00 3 CONN TO EXIST 8" WATERMAIN 1.00 LS 400.00 400.00 • 450.00 ------------ 450.00 250.00 ------------ 250.00 250.00 --------w--- 250.00 ------------ 7,665.00 7,950.00 7,077.70 7,850.00 DIVISION 1 1 1 - STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 12" RC PIPE SEWER CL V 104.00 LF 17.00 %768.00 21.25 2,210.00 13.58 1,412.32 18.00 1,872.00 2' 15" RC PIPE SEWER CL V 162.00 LF 18.50 2,997.00 22.10 3,580.20 14.77 2,392.74 20.00 3,240.00 3 181' RC P1 PE SEWER CL V 280.00 LF 20.50 5,740.00 23.50 6,580.00 16.37 4,583.60 23.00 6,440.00 4 24" RC PIPE SEWER CL 1 1 1 14.1 .00 LF 24.50 3,454.50 27.25 3,842.25 19.07 2,688.87 26.00 3,666.00* 5 21 X 31 BOX CATCH. BAS 1 N 2.00 EA 570.00 1 ,140.00 700.00 1 ,400.00 656.00 1,312.00 850.00 1,700.00 6 CATCH BASIN (MANHOLE) AS DET 5.00 EA 720.00 3,600.00 925.00 4,625.00 874.20 4,371.00 1500.00 7,500.00 7 24" RC PI PE CULVERT CL IV - 132.00 LF 29.50 3,894.00 28.60 .3,775.20 23.06 3,043.92 23.00 3,036.00 8 24" RC PIPE APRON.'. . 2.00 EA 570.00 1,140.00 550.00 %100.00 613.00 1,226 .00 550.00 1P100.00 9 51 " SPAN RC PIPE ARCH CULVERT 254:00 LF 76.00 19,304.00 70.00 17,780.00 76.95 19,545.30 65.00 16,510.00 10 51" SPAN RC PIPE . ARCH_ APRON 2.00 EA 1125.00 2,250.00 1000.00 2,000.00 1184.50 2..369.00- 900.00 1,.800.00 11 REM/REPL 12" VCP SS 31.00 LF 46.00 1,426.00 70.00 2,170.00 25.39 787.09 26.00 806.00 12 POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 32.00 LF 13.00 416.00 15.00 480.00 23.31 745.92 15.00 480.00 13 RANDOM RIP RAP CL 11 10.00 CY 50.00 500.00 50.00 - 500.00 46.90 469.00 40.00 400.00 14 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 45.00 SY 4.00 180.00 3.00 135.00 11.98 539.10 2.00 90.00 15 COARSE FILTER AGG FOR BEDDING 60.00 CY 12.50 750.00 12.00 ------------ 720.00 6.48 ------------ 388.80 16.00 ------------ 960.00 ------------- 48,5590'50 50,897.65 45,874.66 49..600.001. PAGE 4 GERVAI S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 TOLTZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED COMMISSION NO. 9279 ENG I NEERS- ARCH I TECTS-PL ANNERS BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21, 1988 9:00 AM TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error in this I i ne on original bid C.W. HOULE, INC. RICE LAKE CONTR. RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. SHAFER CONTRACTING ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE E XTE N S I 0 N UNIT PRICE E XTEN S ION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PR 1 CE EXTENSION DIVISION IV STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES 1.00 LS 1350.00 1,350.00 1000.00 1 ,000.00 15000.00 15,000.00 2500.00 2,500.00 2 REM/DI SP CONC CURB & GUTTER 90.00 LF 4.00 360.00 3.00 270.00 2.91 261.90 2.00 180.00 3 REM/D I SP CHAIN LINK FENCE/POST 715.00 LF 1.50 1,0720-50 3.00 2,145.00 2.06 1,472.90 1.00 715.00 4 REM/DI SP 24" CM CULVERT PIPE 61.00 LF 9.00 549.00 8.00 488.00 6.98 425.78 4.00 244.00 5 REM/D I SP 18" DIP FORCEMA I N 140.00 LF 16.00 2,240.00 10.00 1 0400.00 10.05 1,407.00 5.00 700.00 6 COMMON EXCAVATION 10014.00 CY 1.84 18,425.76 1.74 17,424.36 1.00 10,014.00 0.90 9,012.60 7 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 1546.00 CY 2.25 3,478.50 2.00 3,092.00 1 .68 2,597.28 0.90 1,391 .40 8 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION 115.00 CY 4.00 460.00 4.00 460.00 3.99 458.85 6.00 690.00 9 GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 10260.00 CY 3.85 39,501 .00 3.75 38,475.00 4.89 50,171 .40 3.40 34,884.00 10 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) 500.00 CY 7.00 3,500.00 8.00 4,000.00 10.06 5,030.00 6.50 3,250.00 11 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 5200.00 TN 6.35 33,020.00 6.68 34,736.00 5.50 28,600.00 6.75 35,100.00 12 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BINDER 43.50 TN 150.00 6,525.00 135.00 5,872.50 125.01 5,437.94 148.00 60,438.00 13 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BASE 49.30 TN 145.00 7,148.50 135.00 6,655.50 125.01 6,162.99 148.00 71,296.40 14 RECYC BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 11.40 10,602.00 9.87 90,179.10 9.45 8,788.50 10.85 10,090.50 15 RECYC BASE COURSE MIXTURE 820.00 TN 11.50 9,430.00 9.87 8,093.40 9.40 70,708.00 10.85 8,897.00 16 BIT MATERIAL FOR WEAR COURSE 54.00 TN 150.00 8,100.00 135.00 70290.00 125.00 6,750.00 148.00 7,992.00 17 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 12.50 1.1,625.00 12.87 11,969.10 16.90 15,717.00 14.15 13,159.50 18 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 820.00 GA 1.25 1p025.00 1 .10 902.00 1.20 984.00 1.20 984.00 19 CONCRETE WALK 6250.00 SF 1.45 9,062.50 1.22 70625.00 1.77 11,062.50 1.60 10,000.00 20 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER B624 2480.00 LF 5.45 13,516.00 5.65 14,012.00 5.34 13,243.20 5.90 14,632.00 21 6" D I RVEWAY PAVEMENT 30.00 SY 35.00 1,050.00 17.50 525.00 19.47 584.10 27.00 810.00 22 BITUMINOUS CURB 340.00 -LF 4.25 1 ,445.00 3.00 1,020.00 2.75 935.00 2.75 935.00 23 CHAIN LINK FENCE 570.00 LF 7.40 4,218.00 7.00 3,990.00 6.65 3,790.50 6.50 3,705.00 24 METAL BRACKET ASSEMBLY 3.00 EA 49.00 147.00 36.00 108.00 52.67 158.01 100.00 300.00 25 SODDING TYPE B 200.00 SY 3.-00 600.00 3.00 600.00 2.00 400.00 1.50 300.00 26 SEEDI NG2.00 AC 450.00 900.00 250.00 500.00 1000.00 2,000.00 2000.00 4,000.00 27 SEED MIXTURE NO. 504 100.00 LB 5.50 550.00 3..00 300.00 1.75 175.00 3.00 300.00 28 MULCH MATER -IAL TYPE 1 4.00 TN 200.00 800.00 150.00 600.00 300.00 1,200.00 125.00 500.00 29 COMM FERTILIZER 10-10-10 1000.00 LB 0.35 350.00 0.25 250.00 1.00 1,000.00 0.30 300.00 30 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 6+06 1.00 LS 1175.00 1,175.00 750.00 750.00 796.00 796.00 1100.00 1 ,100.00 31 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 11+85 1.00 LS 975.00 975.00 750.00 750.00 761.00 761.00 1200.00 1,200.00 32 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX 5.00 EA 100.00 500.00 85.00 425.00 50.00 250.00 125.00 625.00 33 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE 11.80 LF 115.00 1;357.00 125.00 1,475.00 110.00 1 ,298.00 160.00 1,888.00 195,057.76 186s,381.96 ------------ 2040640.85 ---------- - 184,119.40 DIVISION V= STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 ' PERMANENT BARRICADES 16.00 LF 57.00 912.00 25.00 400.00 18.63 298.08 35.00 560.00 2 • 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW PAINT 1250.001F 0.70 875.00 - 0.54 675.00 1 .00 1,250.00 0.40 500.00 ------------ 1,787.00 ------------ 1 ,075.00 ------------ 1,548.08 ------------ 1,060.00 BID SUMMATION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE 55,169.05 62,103.50 49,659.44 70,652.50 DIVISION 11 - WATERMA I N - MSA INELIGIBLE 7,665.00 7,950.00 7,077.70 7,850.00 DIVISION I I I - STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE 48,559.50 50,897.65 45,874.66 49,600.00 DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 195,057.76 186p381.96 204,640.85 184,119.40 DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 ,787.00 1,075.00 1,548.08 1,060.00 308,238.31 308,408.11 308,800.73 313,281 .90 GERVAI S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 MAPLEWOOD, MI NNESOTA . COMMISSION NO. 9279 BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21 , 1988 9: 00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEIdER - MSA INELIGIBLE PAG E 5 TOL TZ, KING, DUV ALL,. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENG I NEERS-.ARCH I TECTS- PLANNERS TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error In this I i ne on original bid TOTAL ASPHALT CONST. AUSTIN P. KELLER LAKE AREA UTILITY 0 8 P CONTRACTING QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PR I CE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 REM. DI SP EX 18 X 16 FM TEE ETC 1 .00 LS 5500.00 5,500.00 5000.00 5,000.00 3895.00 3,895.00 3000.00 3,000.00 2 REM EXISTING MANHOLE 1.00 LS 500.00 500.00 500.00 -500.00 500.00 500.00 450.00 450.00 3 CONN TO EXISTING MANHOLE 3.00 EA 250.00 750.00 1500.00 4,500.00 750.00 2,250.00 450.00 11,350.00 4 CONN TO EX ST 6" SERV ICE PIPE 1.00 EA 100.00 100.00 500.00 500.00 190.00 190.00 450.00 450.00 5 6" PVC SDH 40 SERVICE C/O 1.00 EA 200.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 328.00 328.00 800.00 800.00 6 6" PV C SCH 40 SS SERV ICE PIPE 45.00 LF 15.00 675.00 14.00 630.00 11.00 495.00 20.00 900.00 7 8" PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 235.00 LF 14.00 3,290.00 13.00 3,055.00 10.80 2,538.00 16.00 3,760.00 8 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 0-101 DEPTH 290.00 LF 17.00 4,930.00 16.00 4,640.00 13.85 4,016.50 19.00 5,510.00 9 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 10-12' 280.00 LF 19.00 5,320.00 16.00 4,480.00 15.35 4,298.00 20.00 5,600.00 10 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 12-141 250.00 LF 20.00 5,000.00 16.00 4,000.00 16.85 4,212.50 22000 5,500.00 11 12" PVC SDR 35 SS > 141 650.00 LF 23.00 14,950.00 16.00 10,400.00 22.00 14,300.00 27.00 17,550.00 12 12" DIP CL 50 SJ SS PLAN DEPTH 20.00 LF 45.00 900.00 21.00 420.00 25.00 500.00 32.00 640.00 13 15" PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 170.00 LF 28.00 4,760.00 17.00 2,890.00 24.50 4,165.00 22.00 3,740.00 14 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL 1755.00 LF 3.00 5,265.00 3.00 5,265.00 3.00 51,265000 0.10 175.50 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE 45.00 TN 10.00 450.00 10.00 450.00 12.00 540.00 8.00 360.00 16 4f DIA MANHOLE 0-10t DEPTH 6.00 EA 1150.00 6,900.00 1200.00 7,200.00 1200.00 7,200.00 1200.00 7,200.00 17 EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE > 10' 11.50 LF 85.00 977.50 70.00 805.00 60.00 690.00 70.00 805.00 18 1211 OUTSIDE DROP 1.00 LS 3000.00 ------------ 3,000.00 1200.00 ------------ 1,200.00 2640.00 ------------ 2,640.00 1400.00 ___--------- 1,400.00 63,467.50 56,235.00 58,023.00* 59,190.50 DIVISION 11 - WATERMAIN - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 WET TAP, INCL TEE AND GV 2.00 EA 2500.00 5,000.00 1200.00 2,400.00 3095.00 61,190.00 2500.00 5, 000.00 2 8" DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 110.00 LF 20.00 2,200.00 19.00 2,090.00 21.00 20310.00 26.00 2,860.00 3 CONN TO EXIST 8" WATERMAIN 1.00 LS 250.00 ------------ 250.00 900.00 ------------ 900.00 500.00 ------------ - 500.00 500.00 ---------..-- 500.00 7,450.00 51,390.00 9,000.00 8,360.00 DIV IS ION I I I - STORM SEWER - MSA EL IG IBLE 1 12" RC PIPE SEWER CL V 2 15" RC PI PE SEWER CL V 3 18" RC PIPE SEWER CL V 4 24" RC PIPE SEWER CL III 5 21 X 3' BOX CATCH BAS I N 6 CATCH BASIN (MANHOLE) AS DET 7 24" RC PIPE CULVERT CL IV 8 24" RC PI PE APRON 9 '51 " SPAN RC PIPE ARCH CULVERT 10 51 " SPAN RC PIPE ARCH APRON 11 REM/ RE PL 12" VCP SS 12 POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 13 RANDOM RIP RAP CL II 14 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 15 COARSE FILTER AGG FOR BEDDING 104.00 LF 162.00 LF 280.00 LF 141.00 LF 2.00 EA 5.00 EA 132.00 LF 2.00 EA 254.00 LF 2.00 EA 31.00 LF 32.00 LF 10.00 CY 45:00 SY 60.00 CY 20.00 2,080.00 22.00 3,564.00 24.00 6,720.00 26.00 3,666.00 900.00 1,800.00 900.00 4,500.00 30.00 3,960.00 550.00 1,100.00 75.00 19,050.00 1000.00 2,000.00 50.00 1,550.00 30.00 960.00 50.00 500.00 3.00 135.00 10.00 600.00 52,185.00 16.00 1,664.00 17.00 2,754.00 20.00 5,600.00 22.00 3,102.00 800.00 1,600.00 1200.00 6,000.00 22.00 2,904.00 625.00 1,250.00 80.00 20,320.00 1000.00 2,000.00 100.00 3,100.00 10.00 320.00 30.00 300.00 6.00 270.00 15.00- 900.00 52,084.00 15.00 1,560.00 16.00 2,592.00 18.00 5,040.00 22.00 3,102.00 650.00 1,300.00 1190.00 5,950.00 34.00 4,488.00 640.00 1 ,280.00 94.00 23 ,876.00 1285.00 2,570.00 115.00 3,565.00 15.00 480.00 40.00 400.00 3.00 135.00 18.00 1,080.00 57,418.00 23.00 2,392.00 24.00 3,888.00 25.00 7,000.00 27.00 3,807.00 850.00 1,700.00 1100:00 5,500.00 30..00- 3,960.00 800.00 1p600.00 68.00 17,272.00 1500.00 3,000.00 42.00 1p302.00 15.00 480.00 40.00 400.00 1.00 45.00 10.00 ------------ 600.00 52,946.00 1. PAGE 6 GERV A I S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 TOL TZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED COMMISSION NO. 9279 ENG I VEERS- ARCH I TECTS-PL AWJERS BIDS OPENED: DECEMBE.? 21, 1988 9:00 AM TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error i n this I i ne on or i g i na l bid TOTAL ASPHALT CONST. AUSTIN P. KELLER LAKE AREA UTILITY 0 b P CONTRACTING ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES 1.00 LS, 3000.00 3,000.00 2000.00 2,000.00 1000.00 1 ,000.00 875.00 875.00 2 REM/D I SP CONC CURB b GUTTER 90.00 LF 1.50 135.00 4.00 360.00 3.00 270.00 3.00 270.00 3 REM/DI SP CHAIN LINK FENCE/POST 715.00 LF 0.50 357.50 2.00 1,430.00 1.10 786.50 1.00 715.00 4 REM/Dl SP 24 f1 CM CULVERT PI PE 61.00 LF 10.00 610.00 10.00 610.00 5.00 305.00 3.00 183.00 5 REM/D I SP 1811 DIP FORCEMA I N 140.00 LF 15.00 2,100.00 10.00 1 ,400.00 10.00 1,400.00 4.00 560.00 6 COMMON EXCAVATION 10014.00 CY 1.48 14,820.72 1.60 16,022.40 1.74 17,424.36 1.75 17,524.50 7 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 1546.00 CY 1.68 2,597.28* 3.00 4,638.00 2.00 3,092.00 2.00 3,092.00 8 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION 115.00 CY 3.95 454.25 3.00 345.00 3.00 345.00 3.00 345.00 9 GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 10260.00 CY 4.22 43,297.20 5.00 51 ,300.00 3.75 38,475.00 5.00 51 ,300.00 10 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) 500.00 CY 5.85 2,925.00 10.00 5,000.00 6.75 3,375.00 6.60 3,300.00 11 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 5200.00 TN 6.60 34,320.00 7.00 36,400.00 6.45 33,540.00 6.11 31,772.00 12 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BINDER 43.50 TN 135.00 5,872.50 135.00 5,872.50* 148.00 6,438.00 138.00 6,003.00 13 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BASE 49.30 TN 135.00 6,655.50 135.00 6,655.50 148.00 7,296.40 138.00 6,803.40 14 RECYC BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 9.87 9,179.10 9.87 9,179.10 12.00 11 ,160.00 10.40 9,672.00 15 RECYC BASE COURSE MIXTURE 820.00 TN 9.87 8,093.40 9.87 8,093.40 12.00 9,840.00 10.34 8,478.80 16 BIT MATERIAL FOR WEAR COURSE 54.00 TN 135.00 7,290.00 135.00 7,290.00 148.00 7,992.00 138.00 7,452.00 17 WEAR 1 NG COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 12.78 11 ,885.40 12.87 11,969.10 13.45 12,508.50 18.59 17,288.70 18 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 820.00 GA 1.15 943.00 1.10 902.00 1.10 902.00 1.32 1,082.40 19 CONCRETE WALK 6250.00 SF 1.80 11 ,250.00 1.50 9,375.00 1 .40 8,750.00 1.48 9,250.00 20 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B624 2480.00 LF 5.50 13,640.00 5.00 12,400.00 5.55 13,764.00 5.76 14,284.80 21 6" D I RVEWAY PAVEMENT 30.00 SY 20.00 600.00 20.00 600.00 22.00 660.00 18.70 561.00 22 BITUMINOUS CURB 340.00 LF' 2.50 850.00 2.50 850.00* 3.30 1,122.00 3.25 1,105.00 23 CHAIN LINK FENCE 570.00 LF 7.00 3,990.00 7.00 3,990.00 7.70 4,389.00 7.32 4,172.40 24 METAL BRACKET ASSEMBLY 3.00 EA 50.00 150.00 50.00 150.00 40.00 120.00 40.00 120.00 25 SODD 1 NG TYPE B 200.00 SY 2.40 480.00 3.00 600.00 4.40 880.00 2.75 550.00 26 SEEDING 2.0.0 AC 230.00 460.00 300.00 600.00 358.00 716.00 110.00 220.00 27 SEED MIXTURE NO. 500 100.00 LB 2.45 245.00 2.50 250.00 3.30 330.00 2.75 275.00 28 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 4.00 TN 160.00 640.00 155.00 620.00 148.00 592.00 165.00 660.00 29 COMM FERTILIZER 10-10-10 1000.00 LB 0.20 200.00 1 0.20 200.00 0.30 300.00 0.34 340.00 30 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 6+06 1.00 LS 1800.00 1, 800.00 1000.00 1, 000.00 1725.00 1, 725.00 1000.00 1P000.00 31. RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 11+85 1.00 LS 1200.00 1,200.00 1000.00 1,000.00 1750.00 1 ,750.00 1000.00 1 ,000.00. 32 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX 5.00 EA 75.00 375.00 100.00 500.00 95.00 475.00 75.00 375.00 33 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE 11.80 LF 200.00 2,360.00 ------------ 90.00 1 ,062.00 ------------ 200.00 ------------ 2,360.00 100.00 1 ,180.00 ------------ 192,775.85 202,664.00 194,082.76* 201,810.00 DIVISION V- STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 . PERMANENT BARRICADES 16.00 LF 25.00 400.00 50.00 800.00 28.00 448.00 24.00 384.00 2 411 BROKEN LINE YELLOW PAINT 1250.00 LF 0.55 687.50 ------------ 1.00 1,250.00 ------------ 0.93 1,162.50 ------------ 0.60 750.00. 1,087.50 2,050.00 1,610.50 ------------ 1 ,134.00 BID SUMMATION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE 63,467.50* 56,235.00 58,023.00* 59,190.50 DIVISION 11 - WATERMA I N - MSA I NEL -IG IBLE 7,450.00 5,390.00 9,000.00 8,360.00 DIVISION III - STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE 52,185.00 52,084.00 57,418.00 52,946.00 DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 192,775.85 202,664.00 194,082.76* - -201,810.00 DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 ,087.50 2,050.00 1,610.50 1,134.00 316.,965.85* 318,423.00 320.,134.26* 323,440.50 GERVAI S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 MAPL EWOOD, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 9279 • BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21, 1988 9:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 REM. D i SP EX 18 X 16 FM TEE ETC 1 .00 LS 2 REM EXISTING MANHOLE 1.00 LS 3 CONN TO EXISTING MANHOLE 3.00 EA 4 CONN TO EX ST 6" SERV ICE PI PE 1.00 EA 5 611 PVC SCH 40 SERVICE C/O 1.00 EA 6 6/1 PVC SCH 40 SS SERVICE PIPE 45.00 LF 7 811 PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 235.00 LF 8 1211 PVC SDR 35 SS 0-101 DEPTH 290.00 LF 9 1211 PVC SDR 35 SS 10-121 280.00 LF 10 1211 PVC SDR 35 SS 12-14' 250.00 LF 11 1211 PVC SDR 35 SS > 14' 650.00 LF 12 1211 DIP CL 50 SJ S S PL AN DEPTH 20.00 LF 13 15/1 PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 170.00 LF 14 GRANUL AR BEDD I NG MATER I AL 1755.00 LF 15 COARSE FILTER AGG REG ATE 45.00 TN 16 41 DIA MANHOLE 0-10f DEPTH 6.00 EA 17 EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE > 101 11.50 LF 18 1211 OUTS 1 DE DROP 1.00 LS PAGE 7 TOLTZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENG I NEERS- ARCH I TE CTS -PL ANNERS TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error in this I i ne on original -bid F.M. FRATTAL ONE HOL ST E XCAV AT I NG ALBRECHT EXCAVATING NORTHWEST AS PH AL T UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 3470.00 3,470.00 300.00 300.00 500.00 1,500.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 20.00 900.00 13.50 3,172.50 15.50 4,495.00 16.50 4,620.00 17.50 4,375.00 18.50 12,025.00 20.00 400.00 19.00 3p230.00 0.40 702.00 11.00 495.00 990.00 5,940.00 54.00 621.00 1500.00 1,500.00 DIVISION 11 - WATERMAIN - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 WET TAP, 1 NCL TEE AND GV 2.00 EA 2800.00 2 8t1 DIP CLASS 52 WATERMA I N 110.00 LF 16.00 3 CONN TO EXIST 8" WATERMAI N 1.00 LS 300.00 DIVISION I I I - STORM SEWER.- MSA ELIGIBLE 1 1211 RC PIPE SEWER CL V 104.00 LF 2 1511 RC PIPE SEWER CL V 162.00 LF 3 1811 RC PIPE SEWER CL V 280.00 LF 4 241i RC P I PE SEWER CL I 11 141.00 LF 5 21 X 31 BOX CATCH B AS I N 2.00 EA 6 CATCH BASIN (MANHOLE) AS DET 5.00 EA 7 24" RC PIPE CULVERT CL IV 132.00 LF 8 24" RC PIPE APRON • 2.00 EA 9 5111 SPAN RC PIPE ARCH CULVERT 254.00 LF 10 5111 SPAN RC PIPE ARCH APRON 2.00 EA 11 REM/REPL 1211 VCP SS 31.00 LF 12 POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 32.00 LF 13 RANDOM R I P RAP CL 11 10.00 CY 14 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 45.00 SY 15 COARSE FILTER AGG FOR BEDDING 60.00 CY 47,945.50 3600.00 3,600.00 500.00 500.00 300.00 900.00 350.00 350.00 500.00 500.00 9.30 418.50 9.30 2,185.50 12.65 3,668.50 12.65 3t542.00 12.65 3,162.50 16.00 10,400.00 23.00 460.00 16.00 2,720.00 4.50 7,897.50 10.00 450.00 1100.00 6,600.00 80.00 920.00 1700.00 1,700.00 49,974.50 5000.00 5,000.00 1600.00 1,600.00 900.00 2,700.00 400.00 400.00 190.00 190.00 15.00 675.00 14.00 3,290.00 15.00 4,350.00 17.00 4,760.00 19.00 4,750.00 23.00 14;950.00 32.00 640.00 22.00 3,740.00 3.50 6,142.50 14.00 630.00 1000.00 6,000.00 60.00 690.00 1400.00 1,400.00 61,907.50 4350.00 41,350.00 230.00 230.00 350.00 1 ,050.00 230.00 230.00 240.00 240.00 15.00 675.00 15.00 3,525.00 15.50 4,495.00 16.50 4,620.00 18.00 4,500.00 20.00 13,000.00 14.00 280.00 20.50 3,485.00 3.00 5,265.00 12.00 540.00 1200.00 7,200.00 80.00 920.00 1850.00 1,850.00 56,455.00 5,600.00 3200.00 6,400.00 2900.00 5,800.00 7000.00 14,000.00 1 ,760.00 17.60 1 ,936.00 19.00 2,090.00 14.50 1,595.00 300.00 420.00 420.00 400.00 400.00 300.00 300.00 ---- - --- - - - - - 7,660.00 7t660.00 - - - -------- ------ 8,756.00 --- --- 8,290.00 ------------ ----------- 15,895.00 20.00 2,080.00 21.00 3,402.00 22.00 6,160.00 27.00 3,807.00. 890.00 1,780.00 890.00 4,450.00 29.00 3,828.00' 575.00 1 ,150.00. . 74.00 18,796.00 940.00 1,880.00 112.00 3,472.00 12.00 384.00 25.00 250.00 1.00 45.00 9.00 ------------- 540.00 52,024.00 18.00 1 ,872.00 19.00 3,078.00 22.00 6,160.00 29.00 4,089.00 550.00 1,100.00 ..660.00 3,300.00 32.00 4,224.00 600.00 1,200.00 88.00 22,352.00 1100.00 2,200.00 40.00 1,240.00 13.50 432.00 30.00 300.00 2.50 112.50 10.50 ------------ 630.00 52,289.50 19.00 1,976.00 20.00 3,240.00 23.00 6,440.00 29.00 4,089.00 725.00 1,450.00 900.00 4,500.00 32.00 41224.00 700.00 1 ,400.00 79.00 20,066.00 900.00 1,800.00 32.00 992.00 10.00 320.00 35.00 350.00 2.00 90.00. 10.00 600.00 51v537.00 20.50 2,132.00 20.50 3,321.00 22.50 6,300.00 26.00 3,666.00 800.00 1,600.00 1100.00 5,500.00 30.00 3,960.00 525.00 1,050.00 78.00 191,812.00 1600.00 3,200.00 53.00 1,643.00 23.00 736.00 44.00 440.00 3.00 135.00 30.00 1,800.00 55,295.00 PAGE 8 GERV AI S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 TOLTZ, KING, DUV ALL, ANDERSON MAPL EWOOD, MINNESOTA AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED COMMISSION NO. 9279 ENG 1 NEERS- ARCH I TECTS-PL ANNERS BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21, 1988 9 :00 AM - TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error In this I i ne on original bid F. M. FRATTALONE HOLST EXCAVATING ALBRECHT EXCAVATING NORTHWEST ASPHALT ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTI TY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PR i CE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES 1.00 LS 2420.00 2,420.00 18000.00 180000.00 4000.00 4,000.00 3000.00 30000.00 2 REM/D I SP CONC CURB & GUTTER 90.00 LF 1.00 90.00 3.50 315.00 2.00 180.00 3.00 270.00 3 REM/D1 SP CHAIN LINK FENCE/POST 715.00 LF 2.00 1,430.00 2.20 1 ,573.00 1 .10 786.50 5.00 3,575.00 4 REM/DI SP 24" CM CULVERT PIPE 61.00 LF 5.00 305.00 5.50 335.50 4.00 244.00 10.00 610.00 5 REM/DISP 18" DIP FORCEMAIN 140.00 LF 6.00 840.00 7.70 1,078.00 14.00 1,960.00 12.00 1,680.00 6 COMMON EXCAVATION 10014.00 CY 2.85 28,539.90 2.50 25, 035.00 1.25 12p517 .50 3.10 31, 043.40 7 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 1546.00 CY 2.00 3 , 092.00 3.00 4p638.00 3.00 4p638.00 2.10 3s,246.60 8 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION 115.00 CY 3.50 402.50 3.50 402.50 3.00 345.00. 2.10 241.50 9 GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 10260.00 CY 4.40 45,144.00 4.40 45,144.00 5.25 53,865.00 3.50 35,910.00 10 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) 500.00 CY 5.00 2, 500.00 7.70 3t850.00 6.00 31,000.00 9.00 4 , 500.00 11 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 5200.00 TN 7.25 37,700.00 5.80 30,160.00 6.60 34,320.00 6.15 31,980.00 12 BIT MATER 1 AL FOR RECYC BINDER 43.50 TN 148.50 6,459.75 130.00 5,655.00 130.00 5,655.00 125.00 5,437.50 13 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BASE 4.9.30 TN 148.50 7t321.05 130.00 6,409.00 130.00 60409.00 125.00 6,162.50 14 RECYC BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 11.99 11 ,150.70 9.90 9,207.00 12.60 11,718.00 14.10 130,113.00 15 RECYC BASE COURSE MIXTURE 820.00 TN 11.99 9p831.80 9.90 8,118.00 12.60 10,332.00 14.10 11,562.00 16 BIT MATERIAL FOR WEAR COURSE 54.00 TN 148.50 8,019.00 130.00 7,020.00 130.00 7,020.00 125.00 6,750.00 17 WEAR i NG COURSE MIXTURE 930.00 TN 13.48 12,536.40 17.75 16,507.50 1.4.50 13.,485.00 15.30 14,229.00 18 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 820..00 GA 1.10 902.00 1.25 1p025.00 1 .05 861.00 1 .50 1 , 23 0.00' 19 CONCRETE WALK 6250.00 SF 1.41 8,812.50 1.35 8,437.50 1.38 8,625.00 1.30 8,125.00 20 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B624 2480.00 LF 5.89 14,607.20 5.30 13,144.00 5.80 14,384.00 5.50 13,640.00 21 6" D I RVEWAY PAVEMENT 30.00 SY 23.10 693.00 21.00 630.00 17.50 525.00 18.00 540.00 22 BITUMINOUS CURB 340.00 LF 3.30 1,122.00 2.90 986.00 3.10 1,054.00 3.00 1 ,020.00 23 CHAIN LINK FENCE 570.00 LF 7.32 4,172.40 7.00 3,990.00 7.40 4,2i 8.00 7.00 3,990.00 24 METAL BRACKET ASSEMBLY 3.00 EA 39.60 118.80 38.00 114.00 300.00 9.00.00 40.00 120.00 25 SODDING TYPE B 200.00 SY 3.00 600.00 3.65 730.00 3.00 600.00 3.00 600.00 26 SEEDING 2.00 AC 750.00 1p500.00 315.00 630.00 650.00 1,300.00 110.00 220.00 27 SEED MIXTURE NO. 500 100.00 LB 3.25 325.00 3.65 365.00 4.50 450.00 3.00 300.00 28 MULCH MATER 1 AL TYPE 1 4.00 TN 175.00 700.00 315.00 1,260.00 300.00 1,200.00 150.00 600.00 29 COMM FERTILIZER 10-10-10 1000.00 LB 0.50 500.00 0.55 550.00 0.50 500.00 0.35 350.00 30 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 6+06 1.00 LS 1500.00 1 , 500.00 800.00 800.00 1200.00 1,200.00 2300.00 2,300.00 31 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 11+85 1.00 LS 1700.00 1 ,700.00 800.00 800.00 1200.00 1p200.00 900.00 900.00 32 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX 5.00 EA 90.00 450.00 100.00 500.00 100.00' 500.00 100.00 500.00 33 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE 11.80 LF 125000 ------------- 1,475.00 75.00 ------------ 885.00 100.00 1,180.00 150.00 1,770.00 216,960.00 218,294.00 ------------ 209,172.00 ------------ 209,515.50* DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 PERMANENT BARR1 CADES i6.00 LF 19.95 319.20 22.00 352.00 _ 125.00 2,000.00 35.00 560.00 2 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW PAINT • 1250.00 LF 0.94 1,175.00 ------------ 1.20 ------------ 1 ,500.00 1.00 ------------ 1,250.00 -0.60 750.00 1 ,494.20 1,852.00 3,250.00 ------------ 1,310.00 BID SUMMATION DIVISION 1 - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE 47,945.50 49,974.50 61,907.50 56,455.00 DIVISION 11 - WATERMA I N - MSA INELIGIBLE 7, 660.00 8,756.00 8,290.00 15,895.00 DIVISION 1 I 1 - STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE 52,024.00 52,289.50 51p537.00 55,295.00 DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 2160960.00 218,294.00 209,172:00 209,515.50* DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 ,494.20 1,852.00 30250.00 13,310.00 326,083.70 331,166.00 334,156.50 338,470.50* GERV A I S AVENUE, CITY PROJECT 88-14 MAPL EWOOD, MINNESOTA COMM I I S S I ON N0. 9279 BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21 , 1988 9:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 REM. D I SP EX 18 X 16 FM TEE ETC 2 REM EXISTING MANHOLE 3 CONN TO EXISTING MANHOLE 4 CONN TO EXIST 6" SERVICE PIPE 5 6" PVC SCH 40 SERVICE C/O 6 6" PVC SCH 40 SS SERVICE PIPE 7 8" PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 8 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 0-101 DEPTH 9 1211 PVC SDR 35 SS 10-121 10 12" PVC SDR 35 SS 12-14' 11 1211 PVC SDR_ 35 SS > 141 12 12" DIP CL 50 SJ SS PLAN DEPTH 13 1511 PVC SDR 35 SS PLAN DEPTH 14 GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL 15 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE 16 41 DIA MANHOLE 0-101 DEPTH 17, EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE > 101 18 12" OU TS I DE DROP DIVISION 11 - WATERMAIN - PdSA INELIGIBLE 1 WET TAP, INCL TEE AND GV 2 8" DIP CLASS 52 WATERMA 1 N 3 CONN TO EXIST 811 WATERMA I N DIVISION III - STORM SEWER - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 1211 RC PIPE SEWER CL V 2 1511 RC PIPE SEWER CL V 3 1811 RC PIPE SEWER CL V- 4 24+' RC PI PE . SEWER CL I I I 5 21 X 31 BOX CATCH BAS IN 6 CATCH BASIN (MANHOLE) AS DET 7 24" RC PIPE CULVERT CL IV 8 24" RC PIPE APRON 9 51" SPAN RC P IPE ARCH CULVERT 10 5111 SPAN RC PIPE ARCH APRON 11 REM/REPL 12" VCP SS 12 POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 13 RANDOM RIP RAP CL 11 14 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 15 - COARSE FILTER AGG FOR BEDDING PAGE 9 TOL TZ, K I �)G, DUV ALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCI RTES, INCORPORATED ENG I NEERS- ARCH I TECTS- PL ANNERS TABULATION ,OF BIDS *Denotes error i n 'thi s I i ne ' on original b i d ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CARL BOL ANDER 8 'SONS PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1.00 LS 5620.00 5,620.00 1.00 LS 214.00 214.00 3.00 EA 385.00 1,155.00 1.00 EA 161.00 161.00 1.00 EA 285.00 285.00 45.00 LF 12.30 553.50 235.00 LF 12.05 2,831.75 290.00 LF 15.00 4,350.00 280.00 LF 15.50 4,340.00 250.00 LF 16.30 4,075.00 650.00 LF 17.15 11,147.50 20.00 LF 23.80 476.00 170.00 LF 18.00 3 , 060.00 1755.00 LF 2.70 4,738.50 45.00 TN 12.30 553.50 6.00 EA 1250.00 7,500.00 11.50 LF 80.00 920.00 1.00 LS 1630.00 1,630.00 53,610.75 2.00 EA 3470.00 6,940.00 110.00 LF 21.00 2,310.00 1.00 LS 1020.00 ------------ 1,020.00' 1,057.50 26.90 10t270.00 104.00 LF 21.40 2,225.60 162.00 LF 23.55 3,815.10 280.00 LF 25.70 7,196.00 141.00 LF 30.00 4,230.00 2.00 EA 867.00 1,734.00 5.00 EA 1125.00 5,625.00 132.00 LF 32.00 4,224.00 2.00 EA 952.00 11,904.00 254.00 LF 93.10 23,647.40 2.00 EA 1725.00 31.00 LF 59.00 _3,450.00 1,829.00 32.00 LF 28.00 896.00 10.00 CY 64.20 642.00 45.00 SY 6.40 288.00 60.00 CY 16.60 996.00 62.702.10 3500.00 3,500.00 500.00 500.00 450.00 1,350.00 350.00 350.00 250.00 250.00 23.50 1,057.50 26.90 6,321.50 28.00 8,120.00 28.00 7,840.00 28.00 7,000.00 28.00 18,200.00 60.00 1,200.00 31.50 5,355.00 4.50 7,897.50 12.00 540.00 1260.00 7,560.00 110.00 1,265.00 850.00 850.00 79,156.50 2500.00 5,000.00 25.00 2,750.00 350.00 350.00 ------------ 80,100.00 ----------- 8,100.00 23.00 2,392.00 24.00 3,888X0 26.00 7,280.00 33.50 4,723.50 700.00 .1,400.00 1300.00 6,500.00 33.00 4,356.00 715.00 11,430.00 84.00 21, 336.00 1350.00 2,700.00 27.00 837.00 15.50 496.00 35.00 350.00 2.00 90.00 18.00 1,080.00 58.858.50 5000.00 5,000.00 900.00 900.00 600.00 1,800.00 400.00 400.00 350.00 350.00 16.10 7240'50 14.80 3,478.00 18.35 5,321.50 19.50 5,460.00 21.00 5,250.00 23.00 14,950.00 35.00 700.00 28.60 4,862.00 3.00 5,265.00 15.00 675.00 1500.00 9,000.00 70.00 805.00 1800.00 1,800.00 66,741 .00 2400.00 4,800.00 16.80 110848.00 400.00 400.00 7,048.00 18.00 1,872.00 19.00 3,078.00 21.00 5,880.00 24.00 3,384.00 800.00 1,600.00 1000.00 5,000.00 28.10 3,709.20 555.00 1,110.00 91.80 23,317.20 1165.00 2,330.00 72.60 2,250.60 9.60 307.20 35.00 350.00 3.20 144.00 16.00 960.00 55,292.20 GERV A I S AVENUE, C 1 TY PROJECT 88-14 MAPL EWOOD, MINNESOTA COMMISSION I.O. 9279 BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 21, 1988 9:00 AM ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE 1 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES 2 REM/D I SP CONC CURB & GUTTER 3 REM/D I SP CHAIN LINK FENCE/POST 4 REM/DI SP 24" CM CULVERT PIPE 5 REM/DI SP 18" DIP FORCEMAI N 6 COMMON EXCAVATION 7 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 8 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAV ATI ON 9 GRANULAR BORROW (LV) 10 TOPSOIL BORROW ( LV ) 11 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 12 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BINDER 13 BIT MATERIAL FOR RECYC BASE 14 RECYC BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 15 RECYC BASE COURSE MIXTURE 16 BIT MATERIAL FOR WEAR COURSE 17 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 18 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 19 CONCRETE W AL K 20 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER B624 21 6" DIRVEWAY PAVEMENT 22 BITUMINOUS CURB • 23 CHAIN LINK FENCE 24 METAL BRACKET ASSEMBLY 25 SODDING TYPE B 26 SEEDING 27 SEED MIXTURE NO. 500 28 MULCH MATER i AL TYPE 1 29 COMM FERTILIZER 10-10-10 30 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 6+06 31 RELOCATE HYDRANT STA 11+85 32 ADJUST EXISTING V ALV E BOX 33 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE DIVISION V = STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE 1 PERMANENT BARRICADES 2 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW PAINT BID SUMMATION DIVISION I - SANITARY SEWER - VSA INELIGIBLE_ DIVISION If - WATERMAIN - MSA INELIGIBLE DIV I S I ON I I I- STORM SEWER - MSA EL IG I BLE DIVISION IV - STREETS - MSA ELIGIBLE DIVISION V - STREETS - MSA INELIGIBLE PAGE 10 -TOL TZ, K I NG, DUV ALL, ANDERSON AND A,>,d RTES, I NCORPORATED ENG I VEERS- ARCH I TECTS- PL ANNERS TABULATION OF BIDS *Denotes error in this l 'i ne on original bid ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CARL BOL ANDER b SONS PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS Q U AN T I TY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE E XTE N S I O N 1.00 LS 4000.00 4,000.00 5000.00 5,000.00 6500.00 6,500.00 90.00 LF 3.50 315.00 1.00 90.00 2.50 225.00 715.00 LF 1.50 1 ,072.50 1.00 715.00 6.00 4,290.00 61.00 LF 7.00 427.00 7.00 427.00 7.00 427.00 140.00 LF 13.00 1,820.00 14.00 1,960.00 38.70 5,418.00 10014.00 CY 1.55 15,521.70 1.20 12,016.80 3.05 30,542.70 1546.00 CY 2.05 3,169.30 1.20 1 ,855.20 3.05 4,715.30 115.00 CY 3.00 345.00 2.50 287.50 6.20 713.00 10260.00 CY 6.90 70,794.00 5.20 53,352.00 5.05 51,813.00 500.00 CY 10.00 5,000.00 7.50 3,750000 9.50 4,750.00 5200.00 TN 6.40 33,280.00 6.75 35,100.00 5.55 28,860.00 43.50 TN 126.50 5,502.75 140.00 6,090.00 125.00 5,437.50 49.30 TN 126.50 6,236.45 140.00 6,902.00 125.00 6,162.50 930.00 TN 12.40 11p532.00 12.00 11,160.00 9.45 8,788.50 820.00 TN 12.40 10,168.00 12.00 9,840.00 9.40 7,708.00 54.00 TN 126.50 6,831.00 140.00 7,560.00 125.00 6,750.00 930.00 TN 14.50 13,485.00 17.00 15,810.00 16.90 15,717.00 820.00 GA 1.00 820.00 1.30 1,066 .00 1 .20 984.00 6250.00 SF 1.22 7,625.00 1.50 9,375.00 1.50 9,375.00 2480.00 LF 5.65 14,012.00 6.00 14,880.00 5.95 14,756.00 30.00 SY 17.50 525.00 30.00 900.00 25.00 750.00 340.00 LF 3.00 1,020.00 3.00 1 ,020.00 2.75 935.00 570.00 LF - 7.12 4,058.40* 7.50 4,275.00 6.65 3,790.50 3.00 EA 38.52 115.56 50.00 150.00 36.00 108.00 200.00 SY 3.20 640.00 3.00 600.00 3.00 600.00 2.00 AC 316.00 632.00 100.00 200.00 295.00 590.00 100.00 LB 2.65 265.00 3.00 300.00 2.45 245.00 4.00 TN 166.00 664.00 150.00 600.00 155.00 620.00 1000.00 LB 0.20 200.00 0.25 250.00 0.18 180.00 1.00 LS 1750.00 1,750.00 850.00 850.00 1810.00 1 ,810.00 1.00 LS 1400.00 1,400.00 700.00 700.00 970.00 970.00 5.00 EA 100.00 500..00 125.00 625.00 125.00 625.00 11.80 LF 135.00 1 ,593.00 110.00 ------------ 1 ,298.00 175.00 ------------ 2,065.00 ------------ 225,319.66* 209,004.50 227,221 .00 16.00 LF 38.00 608.00 15.00 240,00 35.00 560.00 1250.00 LF 0.60 750.00 1.00 1,250 .00 ------------ 0.54 ------------ 675.00 ------------ 1 ,358.00 1,490.00 1,235.00 53,610.75 79,156.50 66p741.00 10,270.00 8,100.00 7,048.00 62,702.10 58,858.50 55,292.20 225,319.66* 209,004.50 227,221 .00 1,358.00 1,490.00 1,235.00 ;tip ?r,n i1 iSFs _6n9.5n - 357 .537.20 . . RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the/ 2 bid of Danner, Inc. in the amount of $ 85,243.10 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Gervais Avenue from English Street to MN/DOT driveway, City Project 88-14, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. 0 MEMORANIXJM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit or Rezoning LOCATION: County|Road D APPLICANT: N. Walter Goins OWNER: Jean Turner Goins PROJECT:Maple Knoll Apartments DATE: December 27, 3.988 SUMMARY Introduction Action by �gol Modified...... Date - 1. The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to construct a multiple -dwelling complex on property zoned BC, business commercial (the easterly 99.5 feet of the site. See page 6.) Staff is recommending at rezoning to R-3, multiple dwelling as an alternative to "clean up" the zoning map. 2. Please note that the applicant's letter on page 8 describes this project as having 66 units. Since the original submittal in August, the development was redesigned because the "exception" lot is no longer to be included in the project. Findin2s for AP roval 1. Section 36-442 (b) requires that approval of a conditional use permit be based on the following ten findings: a. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. b. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. C, The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. d. The use would not depreciate property values. e. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, dueto the noises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. f. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will ' cause undue burden to the area properties. g. The use would be serviced by es(sential public services, such as. streets p/ lice, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. hThe use would not create excessive additional ^ recIL/ iremnts at public cost for public facilities and seryi c�'�e— and wold not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. i. The use would preserve and incprporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. j. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. ^ 2 Section 36-485 requires that approval of a rezoning be based on the four findings found in the resolution on page 10 The proJect meets the findings for approval of a conditional use permit or rezoning. The BC zone is obsolete --it has R-3, multiple dwelling zones on either side and is not consistent with the RH residential high density designation in the City's land use P '~ n In order to avoid future commercial use of the land, the BC zone should be rezoned to R-3. A conditional use permit 4,4ould not be needed if the rezoning is approved. 1. Approve the resolution on page 10 rezoning the BC zone to R-3. ' 2. Take no action on the conditional use permit, CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 12 property owners within 350 feet of this site °or their comments concerning this project. Of the two replies, one had no comment and one was. in favor. In Favor Comment-- I am in favor of development in this area. I have supported all progress in this community. Therefore, I expect approval when and if I choose to rezone or develop my 1.8 acres also. 2 REFERENCE Site Descriotion 1. Site size: 3.2 acres 2. Existing landuse: The site is comprised of four individual lots, two of which have single dwellings. ,;UrrOUndinci Land Uses Northerly: I-694 Southerly: County Road D Easterly: A single dwelling on a lot zoned R-3, multiple � dwelling residential . ^ Westerly: Maple Ridge Apartments Past Actionc-� The Community Design Review Board conditionally approved plans for this development. ` 1. Land use plan designation: RH, high density residential . This land use category allow� up to 34 persons per net acre. 2. Proposed density: 128 persons Permitted density: 129 persons 3. Zoning: R-3 and BC 4, Section 36-153 (2.a.) lists R-3 uses in a BC zone as a "conditional use" to be approved by the City Council. kd/goins.mem 1. Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan Reduction 4. Applicant's Letter dated August 1, 1.988 5. Resolution 4 Interchange Interchange I I•principalar erinl 694 H Vadnais Heights S — —�- major ._. —M _ _ _ _—_ — = =,,� • o o I e,otor BVD 1 ' RB . - iCDMillorDCo I �, collector' �. ^ _ I • . ' '' . — • o -� _ _J:J mayor collector4 E �Inof- ©rjal 1 Rm 1 _C I o � � -SC1 kil 0 R El L 0S I pew 1 Gold. C 1; I' I VC o rrterld? 8C '-41 i Jr. S r---- �_ _ o S 1 R C OS m �.' . 1� � .-- • S C R H . _ _ / BW- / `• �.l 1 •.�. ' 1♦ 1♦ PJM' P I I '„ "�'� a o i!• a i CM - ...-�• �•• w --- R L L S C 108 Rm Major colle .. ri 3i vB IF i RL i --• t��' R� Oo C sac s st JK 01 M a ■ at s ,•.+ .• BW"4'~_�' � � Qw LSC. I M .7 _ H gh ay 36 i rte el M i I In r ha o . m�1 a ••_ � C13 C t C i " > v m v < w L C O a0 C V m M • Q O E , HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN 5 Attachment 1 . ` ._..._.__,.. _ ' "' J UAL. � •� ! • ^ r o Atcdpv N o i�Cd. Me • No cc c y K A aca'• 0 CY-A_ _ " • _ D o' 1 1 3G. L • .. • • ~ -' • • • I Z 5 06 ao �v i + co fn Aj ;. .a.,►. 1 nc• , $4.0 C O Film RIMMM1933 23e� S.06Oa•c ",' •�o� 080� ac Co 40 O xFa • 7 ek�l D Mapl a Ri dge Apartments.Vi z., �� �. . •,a -u 7. (�,� ��� /e.�a . 1?9� ' + : • G :� 1741 _._.. yEYP FIN EIGD W b L. IE V II -74-R Pao ,�..,, -+ , r r• •..", N1 q D LIFW 00 0 ' �" v': '•' +. 172 a F 0 T A 01 County Road D J PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 'Q 6 Attachment 2 a I • I i c j � � V NDS � ,1 •�- �.I.�.•�1 f'L•..Li �P �— t 1. _ �J i Q'L Q RC�bSLa 'T N iZ GCr t,.L .� E-1.- - is �L Lti-1 t T <�Y AST to �1- 42. GjJ 1 t..O t o,.!'C� W 1T H t; t.J ...2 � PAN J'LP� tL I - U- Ll fZx x' V -#- C_T t O 6.1 P BAST �1t7 Z t�.ltG Z -'D �d.CG �. Cx"fCJ+ �O>•�. : rn:� C�•�1C.. 1 1'f -O y I � 4 h UC,%►4 T PCi �� r _ �i�•l��-tom E. RL "I ll� (� d . •O a L �_ � 4. L.� `- ` � \ /'� I O WALL. AV/ ��}� GotJ.�e--V • C. •Q a � t ! wA.� � t ` ucq►rr FY -*-C- I•• J v . , _ SwtMMtN P w t` . • � . LK,KT Rx.� -� r t l I •! • G' -d "ICI" PCJLX. 0 �• - f�A'SCILJRY- WA,L� • •O FOS? '�, ��T Pt:xl. - - - ---2401. S 139 0 S1• Z4' W --� `- moo. o' _� •- -- -°1 •• 0 • '`• . . ♦1 •� •,; SCS ••� • � �+ • ►_• � S 1`� ^ ' ' . • -� � ; • \•7 - .. r SITE PLAN Attachment 3 PODAWILTZ � CORPORATION 101 SOUTH -7TH AVENUE, SUITE 203. P.O. BOX 1361 ST. CLOUD, MN 56302 (612) 255.1719 LAS 1, 1988 DEVELOPMENT RE: JEAN TURNER GOINS N. WALTER GOINS MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA To Whom It May Concern: Please consider this the request of the undersigned for a Conditional Use Permit to allow multi -family housing in a commercial zone. The intended use - 66 units of multi -family rental housing- is in conformance with all relevant City plans, codes, and guidelines' with the sole exception of a portion of the site is currently zoned commercial. Furthermore: 1. The use is in conformity with the city's Compr ehens i ve Land Use Plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2 The establishment or maintenance of the use shall not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use shall be located , designed , maintained and P o erated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use shall not depreciate property values. 5 The use shall note be hazardous , detrimental or disturbing to present and potential, surrounding land uses due to noisesr- glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, waterpollution, water runoff , vibration, general unsightliness electrical interference or other nuisances. T use The shall generate only minimal vehicular traffic 6. on local streets and shall not create traf f i.c congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties* 8 Attachment 4 AUG 0 1 10 1�4- 'i. il 1, 19 88 Page Two 7. The use shall be served by essential public serves, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools, and parks. 8. The use shall not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and shall not be detrimental to. the welfare of the City. 9. The use shall preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design . 10. The use shall cause minimal adverse* environmental effects. Sincerely, PODAWILTZ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION As Representative for Jean Turner Goins a N. Walter Goins) j. Mi cha 1 oda-r-i-itz i JMP : sms c: Jean Turner Goins N. Walter Goins Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of theCity of Maplewood, Minnesota was duly called and held in the council. chambers in said city on the day of , 1989at 7 p.m. The followJU .ng members were present: The following members were absent: WHEREAS, N. Walter Goins initiated a rezoning from BC, business commercial to R-3, multiple dwelling residential for the following - described property: � EX E 231 FT. PART, LYING S OF HWY 694, OF E 1/8 OF . SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN SEC 34 TN 30 RN 22 WHE. �he �roce�ura� -ii story of this rezoning is as follows: + 1. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning '- Commission on , 198 . The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1989 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof , was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed change will not sbstantially inJure or detract u from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the ' public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical , efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 10 ATTACHMENT 5 Adopted this I day of , 198 . Seconded by Ayes-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed clerk of the City of Maplewood Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City of Maplewood held on the day of , 198 with the original on file in my offjce, and the same is a full , true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the.same relates to this rezoning. Witness my hand as such clerk and the corporate seal of the city this day of , 198 . City Clerk- City lerkCity of Maplewood 11 F' 1 an n i n g Commission Minutes al 1 at i on of these utilities has been Inst m l eted as determined by the City Engineer" co p � b w The applicant nt deeding a _ten -foot -wide util ity he Cit over the east tern feet of easement to t Y One and Lot Thirty, Bloc, :. Seven and Lotsr, Th i rtYq Block Ten, Dearborn Parks A utility easement shall be retained over the west � �-• "_ - 33 feet of the right of waY to be vacated . seconded Ayes--A:•:dahl Bal^rett , Comm i ss i oner� S1 etten se Cardinal Dempsey , .Fischer. Larson , Sigmund ik: , Sl etten D, Conditional Use Permit or Rezoning: Co. fid. Do ( Maple Knol 1 Apartments) The staff report e ort was presented. Norman Cole, ect and app 1 i cant , was present at representing the arch it the meeting. There were no comment from the public on this proposal . Commissioner Larson moved the Planning Commission recommend rezoning i n g the ESC zone to j.. Approval of the resolution . R-3. f - Tat --e no action on the conditional use permits conded Ayes --A:: dah l , Barrett. , Comm i. ss i ones^ Fischer Se Cardinal , Dempsey, F i scher , Larson , Sigmundik , S1 etten E. Conditional Use Permit Revision - Men and s Secr .,et ��� - -y Olson Presented the staff report. =on s was resent at the meeting and Mary Prochaska a of Menard • P answered questions of COMMIS s overs . Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: he resolution A . Adoption of t revising the -� Maplewood conditional use permit for 2280. • P u i red b codes Elr i ve based on the findings req Y TO: FROM'm SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PROJECT: MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional 'Use Permit Renewal 1810 E. County Road B Roger Fulk Fulk Manufacturing, Inc. January 25, 1989 Action by Council: Mod1fi e�~~~~~~~~__ ReJeot The applicant is requesting renewal o+ a conditional use permit for an M-1, light manufacturing use within 350 feet of a residential zone. BACKGROUND On October 24, 1988, Council renewed and revised this CUP. The requirements for additional landscaping were dropped, since the new sod and existing mature trees provided adequate landscaping. Council gave the applicant three months to construct an eight- fcot-tall screening fence between the original shop building and the shed to hide trash containers. DISCUSSION The wooden screening fence between the shed and the original shop building has still not been constructed. The applicant has explained that the fencing was not accomplished due to health reasons and failure to get bids for the job from fencing companies. Mr. Fulk has indicated he can have the fence installed within three month if the Council would grant another time extension. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use permit for three months for a machine shop within 350 feet of a residential district at 1810 East County Road B, subject to trash enclosure being provided as required by code, or an eight-+oot-ta1l, 100% opaque screening +ence shall be installed between the original shop building and the shed to the south along the *east lot line. All tra\sh containers shall be kept between these two buildings. Total screening of all trash receptacles may be, required in the futurev depending on the development of the adjacent lot to the southwest. �EF[%RENCE PAST ACTION 1.Council originally granted aCUP forthe applicant's first building on September 10, 1979. A CUP was issued for the newer concrete block shop building on February 13, 1984. Four renewals were granted. The present conditions of .approval are: a. The hours of operation shall generally be between 5:00 ` a.m. and 10:00 p.m. b.All equipment and machinery shall bestored indoors" CIO All +ire sa+ety regulat:ions shall be met. d. All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed from the premises` e. Adherence to the site plan, dated January 6, 1984, unless a change is approved by the City~s Community Design Review.Board. 2^ On January 24, 1984, the Community Design Review Board conditionally approved the site plan for this projects Condition two required that if the trash duspster is kept outside, it shall be stored in masonry enclosures with a 100% opaque wooden gate according to ordinance, and shall be a color and material compatible with the building. Location and design shall be subject to staff approval* On January 25, 1988, Council renewed this CUP for six months, subject to: 110 Landscaping being installed in accordance with the approved plan. 2. Trash enclosures as required by code, or the construction of an eight -foot -tall, 100% opaque decorative wood screening fence between the original shop building and the shed to the south. All trash containers shall be kept between these two buildings. The construction of the fence is an interim remedy for screening. Total screening of all trash receptacles may be required in the future, depending on the development of the adjacent lot to the southwest. ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Subsection 36-187 (b)x No building or exterior use, except parking, shall be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permits � sections 36-442 (e, f and g) state the fo11owing x (e+) All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the Council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by Council decision or ordinance. At the one year ar review, the Council may specify an inde+inite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years~ for subsequent reviews. The Council may impose new or additional conditions upon the permit at the time of the initial or subsequent reviews. A ronditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions agreed upon are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the City from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Any conditional use that meets the agreed upon conditions and is later disallowed because of the City enacting or amending official controls shall be considered a legal nonconforming (f) The Council may, upon review, terminate the permit if the approved conditions may have been violated or the use is no longer in effect. Where the construction of a special building or structure of a monetary value in excess of twenty-five thousand ($251000.00) has been permitted the Council shall provide +or a period of amortization of not less than five (5) )/ears. Where public health, safety and welfare concerns are threatened, the five-year amortization period is not required and the Council may determine the amortization period, if any, to be allowed. (g) In the event the Council in its review process decides to consider imposing additional conditions or termination of a conditional use permit, the City Council shall hold at least one public hearing on that permit after a notice of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days before said hearing, The Council shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the boundary lines of the property; upon which such use has been establishedwhich notices are to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. njm/Fulk Attachments: 1, Location Map 2^ Property Line/Zoning Map 3, Original Site/Landscape Plan original • ,_ it.• IA . 'j W KOHL -MAN AVE. . AVE. „ Y C 23 A0 _= • v EOGEHILL R0. vi dC ~ z OEMONT 4 AVE. W) R OK AVE.11 ii 0 ! of AV II1h AVE. O �• gEx ,IAJ NI AY. IFU VAI Rva! AV y E. •. �' G ANOVIEw AVECCUR T 3E IKI OR. ISTlE AVL SHERREN AVE RREN A E. DE AVE. OPE AVE. ~~ ARK AVE. �' • LARK LVE. L ~ a LAURIE R0. 'Cl LAURIEJ Ft l •'�:' 25 : AVE.C _(D5 %40W 64 rf Y > oc AVE } • U K E7 ELDR100 ��JAVE. �• Nin x000 �''�I �I J vi DUBLIC �r )RKS / 64 eLa- IBELMONliT oc AVE. N SKILL MA N o AVE. _ MAlo� ir th Q�' Ros rr0oo AVE. •: i do FRI CV. 29 �. 281-= 1 5 s• «k Y% R J F- 44 W W r O 5 A � 2 Wad a ti a /d rs�E Y AYE + w W CW r < �- 2 9 ^ I AV E n Last e- " z - I E ` W Z z 3 = i PRICE z_►VE IC E. AY G AVIL•„.. F] F-1 LOCATION MAP " Attachment 1 ' J n n e y ?:=a� .•� 1850 � Ki '- 1n ...:•: >: r.::. Shoe •-_ ::::: �....: . 1 ! � •.•:• '�:.• ass; ;. , � � : r � C' � 1 . f:�:= =i.. �:•: ' i i 2_ � � � 111 r ' 1 . ,1 �05 F 3 40 :�:�::�:�:� • 1 � 111 17 moi' �, 7 ALTA FULK MANUFACTURING, INC. i to �r 742 --k c �'! 1 •J/1�'�-� i or t'r� p ' L.�'�Z ter_• J + ' _ /i ' n pq the w • Ae' . y' . ' - �r-•�•�'�: .•!.� Mme..• �• ��� r �� • • • •• J PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q 5 Attachment 2 �•. do 60 , do ,• . • Y TOP County Road 9 '� • •.` 3— r• •t+rz r• . _ _ �• i •- ••• • ,+•• _ • r • .• . • • • • 1 4•- + ..• .+. •.- . r. •� ••i •� .r • _ �.�� .� w err f • w- .�.-�- r• -w• • �- rr.�+... ��� �• _ So V •..-.�+•� -7 •� 4as 11 I •. • two • Irr. •• ,.s e o. .. r • I a w _ • , ` •,, 411, do,.• ,• , •• w w •' •• `to • 1 • . • N •• r •- • •• • go tit CY-1 .0. • - . •, -, • • r ILIap' I ,• • 1• •, ✓ • t. �" �, • tj '1 '+ Exletlnp "'' Spruce - ►�•�.:y:•.,•�•� ;i:' . 1 1 � ewJn.�-t �• ,tial Ito ,�l•�.u.j:l•,% �•�� � ' 1 � 1 •� Poo to / V� ,.��. • •4�•!` �,CI ./,.1 .•, •• in I to . •tn ft I Q _ { r W •• do 0 r IA fit X11 ••�• ,:1 •1 10 �. •r •t �..►' 11. (Y It • •• • w '' • ' • •• CD its;.trtsill�•� OIC►+n.r�% �T `l' New Shop / 1 • •. F—' ,t 1 •• • '� t•i . �^ n 1 f'/ • ,• 1. •; :, _gyp._.. ~ to '41 J. 1 �1' •1 '�. 1•• 1 •fir •�•' 1'� ••.�• . ✓; t' . • •1 to "t /010� • / Ott Mt•< /tom .t , , ; •''.� '.. dO' or - I "% 1 tt1'ti� IFIL/ -IA1 ' • •- •--.L.%.i1I11�•��C� 4t •�. i •• •� tl .. � •. .i , � Y v fZ '-� ,. •� 1 11 .I O dop I • O 1. • Original ShopLU 11. r • • • • . Building 1 —' , Ir a• ,; • 11 I F x i e t i n g t'�n• 1 r,•,r_111If rM 1C ;� No Req u i recd - � �• 111 ,1 Oorage / • • ' ' � •• . '�1 8—foot—tall till• •1;;1 screening fence ♦go y 1 xlslln 1111 +�_ — ShodJ. 11���111 to a to Igo \• - te.goIts Ic"I It 'lip �-+ Required stogy age area for trash -- SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 � MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FR[� Director of COmmunity Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Pipeline Setback Ordinance DATE: February 101 1989 REQUEST Action by Councilo 0. Modified....... Date Councilmember Bastian requested that staff amend the pipeline setback ordinance to exempt unenclosed decks from the required setback. The reason for this request is becauseof a problem with .he Maplewood Meadows plat on County Road D and Gall Avenue. There are several lots on the south side of Gall Avenue that have only enough room between the street and the pipeline setback to construct a house. Adding a deck 'would encroach into the setback. BACKGROUND The pipeline setback ordinance requires a 100 -foot setback between apipeline and a building. The ordinance states that decks are considered part of the building. This setback can be reduced where: 1. The building would be protected from the radiant heat of an explosion by berming or other physical barriers; 2. A 100 -foot setback would be impractical or unnecessary because of existing geography, streets, lot lines or easements; and 3. There will be an oil containment system or where the City finds that a leak would accumulate within the setback area. In the case of the Maplewood Meadows plat, the City approved a reduced setback of 80 feet, provided that berming and an oil containment system are provided. DISCUSSION The purpose of the setback is to protect aadjacent b ilding from a fire caused by the ignition of liquidfrom a leaking pipeline. After consulting with several sources, the City decided that 100 feet would provide a relatively safe setback for a building. The Maplewood fire marshall feels that a deck would decrease this protection, since a deck is often more susceptible to fire than the main building, because of the more readily combustible materials used. The City should look at each encroachment into the 100 -foot setback on a case-by-case basis, rather than allowing all unenclosed decks to encroach into the setback by right. The City can than determine if there is adequate berming and oil containment facilities to allow for an encroachment into the setback. Take no action on the code amendment. Advise the developer of the Maplewood Meadows plat to request City approval for the construction of decks within the 80 -foot setback. The application should include the specific lots requested and a cross-section drawing showing the relative heights of the pipeline, berming, and homes with proposed decks. GO/MEMO2 attachment: Maplewood Meadows preliminary plat � 1ERSTA rE H1GHW Ay -- — NO 6 • ''` - 94 11 12 - 13 1410 �••r 9 - - •� _ double -fronting 1 ots \ _� \ e 1, ,-, d '' S - 4 3 2 1 1 \� .Vsr f � am •r � fl err a•••a• wl.. •.n✓ •►•a N + •• •w .• f zs_ 17 GALL u b0 W •il •A •O - •O W •O {Q i0 f0 1t 1�.. a/ • �� _ _ - \ AJ 14 _ - 0. w -- -- ----- -�_-- --�_- _-N_- __ - L �- •_ -_ _- - - r- _- _ OWN, - Mae -ai J At_t &r W _ _ - �• - - iiar !! r .haa r star r •A i •ata v .!� • �+-r 1 �r r ii�.r ins r w � ' 1 • 2 •� it ` !I � �i ,Standard-si zed --t� ----1- ------ -- - -- ---- 6a� aaa 0060■ ■�aai'a■ra■ T� fit: 60��0 aaa6 ■0aaa 06660aaaa■ aaaii6a6a 66060006 ones* 46600 was •a.•t.araa.oi■■■■r■ .■.ri • � . - � - r .. _ _ • � �� - .- r - - - w. . - - - - - - r _ _ .- - � _� rte• _ _. __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._, _ _ _ � � _ _. _ � . -� �aM •w til .w1 ••••••• a.r •.•• ._/ • 1 - - -� • _ � _. ..�•....r .• w • • - %T-� 1 ' •� OWWT • Cmm c I: ovnot o �: own= E own= s 1 • curcm ounaw i , ovnot ounot J • ounat . - - •_uOlfRatftilL ---••---•••---.q-• ___-_- _-_---L-___--- gooblOOMMTOW ROBERT TILSEN'S HEIGHTS NO. 9 ----- 80 .-foot setback line Location of Amoco Pipeline 80 -foot setback line MAPLEWOOD MEADOWS Preliminary Plat 3 0 Attachment 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Contract Approval and Budget Transfer: Planning Consultant DATE: February 14, 1989 ~ INTRODUCTION This is a request to approve the attached contract with BRW to u| date and edit the Comprehensive plan. A budget transfer of $10,980 is also requested to pay for the consultant. Amtioc byCouncil1 EndorseL Modifie The City Council authorized the hiring of a planning consultant to update and edit the Comprehensive Plan last September. The Council , Planning Commission, and Park and Recreation Commission met last October and madefurther suggestions for changes. The final work program was written up and sent out as a request for proposal to three planning firms. (See attached request for proposal.) The Planning Commission interviewed each consultant and recommends that BRW be hired at a cost of $19,980. DISCUSSION $9,000 was budgeted in 1.988 and carried over, to 1989 for a planning consultant. An additional $10,980 is needed to cover the cost in the contract. The higher contract cost reflects the additional work requested at the joint meeting in October. Approve the attached contract to hire BRW and approve a budget transfer of $10,980 to finance the cost. GO/memo5 Attachments: 1. Request for Proposal 2^ Contract 3~ Planning Commission Minutes REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The City of Maplewood is requesting'proposals to update itt comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan consists of a principal document'of approximately 194 pages" This document consists of background information, population forecasts, a land use plan, a 'Community facilities plan, a parks plan` a housing l d implementation plan Three other plan, a major street p an an an . documents are adopted by reference: 1. An 84 -page capital improvement program adopted in 1988. 2. A comprehensive sewer plan, done by TKDA in 1980. This plan is cu.rently being updated by the City engineering department. � . 3. A transportation plan done by Barton-Aschmnan in 1979. The proposed update should accomplish the following: v 1. Reduce the size of the principal document to 1/2-1/3 of '- its current size if possible, while meeting all of the elements required by the Metropolitan Land Use Planning ` Act. 2. Consolidate goals and objectives so they are clear, useable and relevant. 3. Create a format that is clear and easy-to-use by non- professionals. 4. Update basic statistics, such as population forecasts, ' maps of existing conditions, such as existing land use, and outdated policies and programs, such as housing goals. 5. Undate Updatethe street and sidewa lk plans, based on drafts prepared by City staff. 6. Revise the parks plan based on a reduced ultimate City population and a determination by the parks commission as to which proposed parks acquisitions are still realistic. 7. Compare the land use and zoning classifications to determine their compatibility. 8. Any additional recommendations for change that become apparent. Writing style should be clear, concise and easy -to -read by non- professionals. Final submission should include 25 copies of the document. Please indicate whether you can provide a disk of the document compatible with � Attachment 1 Word Perfect software run on an IBM clone computer. Please submit the following to Geoff Olson, Director of Community Development, 1830 E. County FRoad Bv Maplewood, MN 55109 by November 25, 1988: 1. A maximum cost with an hourly time and materials cost. Costs should include meetings with staff as necessary and at least one meeting each with the Planning Commission, Parks Commission, HRA and*City Counciln 2. References of other cities that you have done similar work for, incTuding at least one sample document. 3. An estimated completion time. A copy of the principal document is enclosed. You may call Geoff Olson at 770-4560 if you Ihave any questions. GOPLANUP 3 SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made effective as of the day of , 89 -b and between City of Maplewood ("Client"), and BRW, Inc., also known as 19 y BRW. Planning, Transportation and Engineering, Inc. ("BRW"), a Wyoming cor- porat i on RECITALS WHEREAS, Client desires to retain BRW to provide certain services with respect to Client's project known as the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Update (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, BRW agrees to provide such services upon the terms and con- ditions contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Services. BRW agrees to perform in a good and professional manner the tasks described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and such additional tasks as may be described on an Addendum executed by the parties hereto in substantially the form of Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (The tasks, whether described on Exhibit A hereto or in an Addendum, are individually referred to hereinafter as a "Task" and are collectively described as the "Services.") BRW shall perform the Services as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed, by virtue of this Agreement and the performance thereof, to have entered into any partnership, joint venture or other relationship with the Client. 2, Additional Services* From time to time hereafter, the parties hereto may a ree to the performance by BRW of Additional Services with respect to the Property. Any such agreement shall be set forth in writing in an •pit B and shall be executed by the Addendum in substantially the form of Exhibit respective parties prior to BRW's performance of any Services thereunder, except p as may be provided to the contrary in Section 3 hereof. Upon proper completion and execution of any such Addendum, such Addendum shall be incorporated into this Agreement and shall have the same force and effect as if the terms of such p Addendum were a art of this Agreement as or i g i nal 1 y executed. The performance o f Services pursuant to an Addendum shall be subject to the terms and conditions og f this Agreement except where the Addendum provides to the contrary, in which case the terms and conditions- of any such Addendum shall control. In all other respects, an Addendum shall supplement and be construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 3. Performance of Additional Services Prior to Execution of Addendum. Thearties hereby agree -that situations may arise in which services other than p y those described on Exhibit A are desired by Client and the time period for the completion of such Services makes the execution of an Addendum impractical prior 1 Attachment 2 to the commencement of BRW's performance of the requested Services. BRW hereby agrees that it shall perform such Services upon the oral request of Client, pending execution of an Addendum, at the hourly rates specified on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 4. Staffing by BRW. The Services shall be performed on behalf of BRW by William Weber. BRW may, in its discretion, assign additional individuals to assist in the performance of the Services. 5. BRW's Representations. BRW hereby represents and warrants that it or its employees and agents have all necessary licenses to perform the Services, have inspected the Property, and are qualified to perform the Services. 6. Client's Responsibilities. Client shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of BRW: a. Designate in writing a person to act as the Client's represen- tative with respect to the Services. The Client's designee shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the Client's policies and decisions with respect to the Services. b. Furnish BRW with all information, criteria, objectives, sche- dules and standards for the Project and the Services. c. Arrange for access to the Property as required for BRW to per- form the Services. d. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, and other documents prepared by BRW and render decisions regarding such documents in a timely manner to prevent delay of the Services. . 7. Fees. BRW shall perform the Services for the fees specified on Exhibit F attached hereto and made a part hereof (or as specified in an Addendum) plus Reimbursable Expenses as hereinafter defined. As used herein Reimbursable Expenses include but are not limited to the following expenses incurred by BRW in the interest of the Project: expense of transportation in connection with the Project; expense of reproductions, postage and handling; expense of renderings, models and mock-ups requested by the Client. 8. ownership and Use of Documents. Documents, diagrams, sketches, sur- veys, design calculations, working drawings and any other materials created or otherwise prepared by BRW as part of its performance of this Agreement are instruments of BRW's service for use solely with respect to the Project and unless otherwise agreed, BRW shall retain all ownership rights, including copyright rights. The Client may retain copies, including reproducible copies, of BRW' s drawings, specifications and other documents for information and reference in connection with the Client's use of the Project. The drawings, specifications and other documents shall not be used by the Client or others on other projects, for additions to the Project or for completion of the Project by 2 others, unless BRW is adjudged to be in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing. Distribution of documents to meet regulatory or for simi- lar purposes in connection with the Project shall not be viewed as publication in derogation of BRW's reserved rights. 9. Termination and Suspension. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven (7) days' written notice if t -he other party fails substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party terminating the Agreement. Failure of the Client to make payment as provided herein shall be considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination. If the Client suspends the Services for more than thirty (30) consecutive days, BRW shall be compensated for Services performed prior to the notice of such suspension. When the Services are resumed, BRW's compensation shall be equitably adjusted to provide for BRW's expenses resulting from the interruption and resumption of the Services. The Client may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven (7) days' written notice to BRW if the Project is permanently abandoned. BRW may terminate this Agreement by written notice if the Services are suspended for more than ninety (90) consecutive days, or if the Project is abandoned by the Client for more than ninety (90) consecutive days. If this Agreement is terminated through no fault 'of BRW; BRW shall be compensated for Services performed prior to termination, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due, together with BRW's expenses which are directly attributable to termination and which are not otherwise paid. 10. Insurance. BRW shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this Agreement and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages and in the amounts described below. BRW shall furnish evidence, satisfactory to the Client, of all such policies. During the term hereof, BRW shall take out and maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies: (a) Comprehensive public liability insurance, including automobile and property damage, insuring the Client . and BRW against loss or liability for dam- ages for personal injury, death or property damage arising out of or in connec- tion with the performance by BRW of its obligations hereunder, with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit for personal injury, death or property damage in any one occurrence. (b) Such workmen's compensation and other similar insurance as may be required by law. (c) Professional liability insurance with minimum liability limits of $500,000.00. 11. Notices. All notices or communications permitted or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, 3 postage prepaid, for mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed, if to a party of this Agreement, to the address set forth next to such party's signature at the end of this Agreement, or if to a person not a party to this Agreement, to the address. designated by a party to this Agreement in the foregoing manner. 12. Taxes, The Client shall be responsible for all state and local gross receipts, sales, use, value added or personal property taxes, however designated, or amounts in lieu of the above taxes paid or payable by BRW, including i ndemni f cation for any interest or penalty assessed against BRW for these taxes through no fault of BRW. The Client also agrees to furnish BRW upon request, with any exemption certificates., proof of payment or other documen- tation requested by BRW. 13, Assignment. Neither party to this Agreement shall assign any right or obligation hereunder in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. No assignment or transfer of any interest under this Agreement shall be deemed to release the assignor from any liability or obliga- tion under this Agreement, or to cause any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a secondary liability or obligation. 14. Amendment, Modification or Waiver. No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or term of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing, signed by the party or parties to be bound, or such party's or parties' duly authorized representatives) and spe- cifying pe- cifying with particularity the nature and extent of such amendment, modification or waiver. Any waiver by any party of any default of the other party shall not effect or impair any right arising from any subsequent default. Nothing herein shall limit the remedies or rights of the parties hereto under and pursuant to this Agreement. 15. Severable Provisions. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect to the transactions ons contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter. 17. Captions, Headings and Titles. All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections to which they apply. 1 . As used herein, where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural and vice versa and masculine, feminine and neuter expressions shall be interchangeable. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be affected by any determination as to who is the drafter of this Agreement, this Agreement having been drafted by mutual agreement of the parties. 4 18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counter- parts,, each of which shall be one and the same Agreement and shall become effec- tive when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party. 19. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for herein shall inure to and bind, the par- ties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided that this sec- tion shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment otherwise prohibited by this Agreement. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and it does not create a contractual relationship with or exist for the benefit of any third party, including contractors, subcontractors and their sureties. 20. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minesota; provided, however, that it is agreed and understood that any applicable statute of limitations shall commence no later than the substan- tial ubstan- tial completion by BRW of the Services. it IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. CLIENT By Its Dated: 700 South Third Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 5 EXHIBIT A Services 1.0 EDIT CERTAIN PLAN ELEMENTS 1.1 Coordination Meeting with City Staff Meet with the Director of Community Development to discuss the details of the upcoming work and review the existing document. 1.2 Planning Framework Goals Edit the material which is already in the Plan for brevity and clarity. Rewrite and reword as necessary. No substantial new material will be introduced or the basic goals changed. 1.3 Neighborhood Concept Edit the material which is already in the Plan for brevity and clarit . Rewrite and reword as necessary. No substantial new material will be introduced or the basic direction changed. 1.4 Forecast of Population, Households, and Employment Update this chapter using forecasts from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council. 1.5 General Land Use Plan Objectives and Policies Edit the material which is already in the Plan for brevity and clarity. Reword and rewrite as necessary. No substantial new material will be introduced or the basic goals or policies changed. City staff is asked to calculate the approximate amount of developable land remaining in the City by type of development for inclusion in the plan. Consultant will compare those figures with the forecast of population, households, and employment by time period. 1.6 Streets Plan Incorporate a summary of the updated Streets Plan. Because this docu- ment was recently updated by City staff, no additional analytic or policy work will be done by the planning consultant other than selecting exerpts for a summary. No additional graphic work will be performed. 1.7 Sidewalks Plan Incorporate a summary of the updated Sidewalks Plan. Because this document was recently updated by City staff, no additional policy or graphic work will be done on it by the planning consultant. 1.8 Community Facilities Element Edit the .material which is already in the Plan for brevity and cl ari ty. No substantial new objectives, policies, or graphics will be introduced. 1.9 Implementation Plan Edit the existing Implementation Plan for brevity and clarity and also remove or replace elements which are obsolete. 2.0 REVISE CERTAIN PLAN ELEMENTS 2.1 Base Map Prepare a base map for use in the parks plan and the housing plan. It is assumed that the City will lend to the planning consultant a good quality acetate of a map showing the present pattern of streets and lots in the City. Add title block, scale, etc. 2.2 Parks Plan Prepare a map showing existing parks and public open space (including school playgrounds) in Maplewood using information supplied by City staff. Tour the existing parks with City staff. Review metropolitan and county park plans that may affect Maplewood. Meet with the Parks Commission to discuss present and forecast park needs. Revise the parks plan based on a reduced ultimate City population, including a parks plan map, park development standards, and parkland acquisition policies and procedures. 2.3 Housing Plan 2.3.1 Description and Analysis of Housing Stock: Describe the households and housing stock of the community using 1980 Census data with an acknowledgment that such infor- mation is outdated but will be revised when the 1990 Census data becomes available. Include housing cost and rental data as obtained through the Metropolitan Council. Include other housing information that may be supplied by City staff such as: (a) an estimate of the current number of housing units by type (b) publicly assisted housing units (e.g., Section 23 leased housing, public housing) and households (e.g., Section 8 rent assistance certificates) 7 (c). current Maplewood housing assistance activities, and (d) an indication of locations of "distressed" housing. It is requested that the City staff estimate the amount of residentially zoned land available for development in Maplewood by residential type (single-family, multi pl e -f ami ly) . Compare they potential additional number of housing units to the fore- cast by the Metropolitan Council for additional housing units. Analyze the above data with regard to: (a) housing type, cost, and condition (b) residential land use and availability (c) relationship to adjacent communities and the metropolitan area (d) relationship to Metropolitan Council plans and policies 2.3.2 Numerical Housing Goals Propose numerical housing goals: (a) Total housing units forecast (b) Affordability levels Low- and moderate -income Modest -cost Middle- and upper-income (c) Target populations (d) Housing units by type (e) Number of units proposed for rehabilitation and demolition 2.3.3 Housing Policies Remove all policies which have become outdated as a result of the major changes in state and federal housing assistance that have occurred during the 1980s. Edit other objectives and policies for brevity and clarity. Introduce new policies as deemed necessary to meet the Metropolitan Council's housing plan guidelines, -including: (a) Low- and moderate -income affordable housing (b) Market -rate housing (c) Housing diversification 8 (d) Housing maintenance, rehabilitation, and redevelopment (e) Residential development and land use (f) Local fiscal initiatives (g) Neighborhood strategies 2.3.4 Implementation Programs Address the following subjects in the Maplewood housing imple- mentation plan: (a) Housing assistance and production programs (b) Housing maintenance, rehabilitation, and redevelopment (c) Local fiscal initiatives (d) Official controls 3.0 REVIEW WITH ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS 3.1 City Planning Commission Submit draft copies of the document to the Planning Commission for their review prior to a meeting at which the draft plan will be discussed. 3.2 Parks. Commission Submit draft copies of the document to the Parks Commission for their review prior to a meeting at which the draft parks plan will be discussed. 3.3 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Submit draft copies of the document to the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority for their review prior to a meeting at which the draft housing plan will be discussed. 3.4 Twin Cities Metropolitan Council City staff will be responsible for submitting copies of the plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review along with the appropriate plan amendment review forms. Thelannin consultant will be available for meetings with the p 9 Metropolitan Council staff to discuss the document. 9 3.5 City Council Submit draft copies of the document to the City Council for their review prior to a meeting at which the draft plan will be discussed. 4.0 FINAL REVISIONS AND DOCUMENT PREPARATION 4.1 Revisions Make changes as directed by the Director of Community Development based upon the comments of the City Council, Planning Commission, Parks Commission, and Metropolitan Council but within the limits of the contract, as it may be amended. Submit the document for final review by the Director of Community Development. 4.2 Document Preparation Prepare and submit 25 copies of the final document including a copy of the text on computer disk in a format compatible with an IBM microcom- puter (ASCII format), 10 EXHIBIT B Addendum No. to Services Agreement This Addendum to that certain Services Agreement dated. , 198_, is made effective as of — , .198 .3. by and between the under- signed ned parties. The Addendum immediately preceding this Addendum was dated 198 . 1. Services to be provided: 2. Fees: lit 3. Schedule: By Its Dated: BRW, Inc. By Its Dated: 11 700 South Third Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 EXHIBIT C BRW, INC. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES TRANSPORTATION AND.PLANNING STUDIOS 1988 CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Principal Principal Vice President Sr. Associate Associate Sr. Professional (William Weber) Professional II Professional I Supervisor/Sr. Technician Technician III Technician II Technician I 12 $120.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 65.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 37.50 32.50 30.00 22.50 EXHIBIT D Fees A detailed budget of person -hours and dollars has been developed for each sub - task of the project and is shown by the table below. We propose to complete the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan Update for a cost not to exceed $19,980, including labor costs and direct expenses. If the work requires less time than shown on the project budget, the cost to Maplewood would be reduced accordingly. We would bill the City on a monthly basis and expect payment within 30 days. Professional services would be billed according to charge rates established for each employee classification, and other expenses such as photocopying would be billed at our cost. For purposes of the budget below, we have used average hourly rates for three employee groups: Senior Professional, Graphic Technician, and Word Processor. Actual hourly rates would be as shown on Exhibit C. Hourly rates are subject to change in April 1989. BRW is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and can furnish such documentation at the request of the City. MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE BUDGET A: Hours by Employee Classification Senior Graphic Task Pro. Tech, Typist Cost Base Map; Staff Meeting 8 16 $ 960 Planning Framework Goals 4 240 Population Forecast 4 1 262 Land Use Plan; Implementation Plan 24 4 1,528 Housing Plan 70 8 49376 Sewers Plan 8 16 832 Parks Plan 64 24 8 45736 Community Facilities 24 8 15616 Sidewalks Plan 2 1 142 Meetings Staff 24 15440 Commissions/Council 20 15200 Revisions and Copying 8 16 4 19048 Cover Design and Printing 4 32 15200 Totals 264 88 50 $19,1580 Hourly Rates 13 $60 $30 $22 MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE BUDGET (CONTINUED) Hours by Employee Classification Senior Graphic Task Pro. Tech., Typist Cost Total Labor Cost Direct Expenses NOT -TO -EXCEED COST $15,840 $2,640 $1,100 $199580 nnn 14 $19,980 -6- Planning Commission Minutes 1-12-89 Go Planning ConsUl tint Selection 10 Yaggy Colby Associates 2. BRW 3, Hoisington Groep The commissioners interviewed the three planning consultant firms. Ron F i c;cUS and Dave Maroney, , gaVe a presentation and were interviewed representing Yaggy Colby Associates. _ Bill Weber gave a presentation and was interviewed representing BRW. Fred Hoisington gave a presentation and was interviewed representing Hoisington Groep, Inca The commissioners voted b (6-88W '2 -Hoisington Group) to recommend hiring BRW as the conSUl t ant firm . 1989 Annual Report Co issioner S1 etten moved to recommend that th .. comma Sion seat h-e'.Vd by Al Goo rrS , unoccLIp ied le to his out -of- - wn absence for educational purpose , be dPc 1 areci Vccant an begin the process of f i l 1 i nq i s seat on the commission. Commissioner R L, sev seconded yes --A:-: d ah 1 Barrett , Cardinal , Demf-)sey, , Fischer, Larson, Sigmund ik S1 rtte"" VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 X . COMMISSION PRESENTAT ONS A. Council Me ings : December and January y B . COUnc i 1 e e t i n g 1-:'3--89: Fran: mpsey X . S_r AFF PR ENTAT I ONS • xi . AD•JO LAMENT M et i n g adjourned at 12:12 a. m. Attachment 3 TO: FROM. SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Council Planning Commission 1988 Annual Report January 4.F 1989 T- 3 .Action by Council, Endorse Modif ied Rejected,.. Date Section 25-23 (5) of 'City code states that one of the duties of the Planning Commission is: "to review, prepare and make report to the City Council by December thirty-first of each year regarding the City comprehensive plan, along with recommendations for changes which the Commission may deem desirable. " 1988 PLAN AMENDMENTS There were twelve amendments to the comprehensive plan in 1988 compared to nine in 1987. Amendments PC Action Council Action Maplewood Highlands Plat street plan change Approved Approved 2228 Maplewood Dr. (HCO3 RM to LSC Approved Approved Century and Seventh (Dege Garden Center) RL to SC Approved Approved Stillwater Road ( Lincoln Park Seniors) C to RH Approved Approved 2829-47 White Bear Avenue ( Midwest Auto Mall) LSC to SC Approved Approved Gervais Avenue Sewer Plan Approved Approved Larpent eur Avenue & Sylvan St. P to OS Approved Approved Holloway Avenue ( Delete between Beebe Road and Furness Street) Denied Denied Sewer Plan: Gonyea' s Oak Hts. Approved Approved Eouthlawn Dr. & Radatz Ave. ( Brandt ) Approved Approved (with revision) Amendments PC Action Council Action Gervais Avenue Housing Denied LSC to RH Lower Af ter Rd. and McKnight Rd, Denied Denied' 1989 WORK PROGRAM An on-going concern with the comprehensive plan has been to get approval from the Metropolitan Council of the revisions to the density conversion table that were approved by the City in 1986. Met Council is holding this up until the City completes its sewer plan. The Engineering Department has completed the plan and is preparing to submit it to the Metropolitan Council* The major task for 1989 will be to updates edit, and reduce the size of the comprehensive plan. A spring tour is planned again this year. The Commission would also like. to participate with the HRA and HRC in planning for seniors through a publication from the Metropolitan Council called ",'Blueprint for Action." ATTENDANCE RECORD OUT OF 18 MEETINGS Les Axdahl 16 Lorraine Fischer 16 Richard Barrett 18 Dennis Larson 13 Mary Sigmundik 14 Bob Cardinal 17 Ralph Sletten 11 Sue Fiola 11 Al Goins 8 Mike Ayers 13 Frank Dempsey (appointed during the year) 16 out of 17 Al Go ins has temporarily moved to Boston for educational ' I purposes. . He does not plan to be back until June. He has requested a temporary leave of absence* * In order to avoid quorum problems, we recommend that Mr. Goins .be replaced. If Mr. Go ins returns and d wishes to rejoin the Commission, he should be given special consideration when there is another opening* RECOMMENDATION Accept the Planning Commission's Annual Report, declare Mr. Go ins' position vacant and authorize staff to advertise for a replacement. mb/89report.mem C 14 Ways to Build A Better Planning Commission he Institute for Education in Local Government in Berkeley, California, suggests 14 ways to improve your local planning commission. 1. Build and adopt bylaws and pro- cedures, and stick to them. 2. Develop and make available to anyone who wants them good and reliable information, data, and maps. 3. Prepare and maintain an adequate general plan, refer to it, and make and implement decisions that are consistent with its policies. �4. Annually re-examine what you are doing as a commission, how well you are doing it, and how to do it better. 5. Outline a year's work on active planning and stick to it. Don't con- fuse development -permit process- ing (plan review) with real planning. 6. Ask to participate in preparing the planning agency's budget. �7. Meet periodically with your city council or county board to ex- change ideas and to assess your mutual objectives. S. Consider a public forum every year or so. Ask people (your "clients") how things are going and what they want done (if anything). 9. Tell your staff what you want, how you want material presented to you, etc. Don't be a passive com- missioner waiting for the "experts" to tell you what to do next. 10. Attend some short courses on new planning techniques or the latest in land use law, and expect your staff to do the same. 11. Tour about as a commission to see what others are doing. Sometimes you will be uplifted to find out how many light years ahead of your neighbors you really are, and sometimes you'll get some ideas worth borrowing. 12. Appoint a commission representa- tive to appear before the elected body when it is necessary to ex- plain or sell an action. Don't expect staff to do your job. 13. Lobby for good planning. If you don't, who will? 14. Take time to orient new commis- sioners to the job. Remember how tough it was to get the hang of it when you were a new member of your commission. J ~ � . Planning Commission ~6- Minutes 1-12-99 GConsultant Selectio nning ' in Y BRW 3.^°^ ^ = ^ ` .� iewed the three planninq The .e ~~..~_--_ ._ _ int interviewedconsultant +irmsa Ron Fiscus and Da e Marone gave a presentation and were rep senting Yagg Colby Associatesm Bill Weber ve a presentation a was interviewed BRW. Fred H , ington gave a presentation interviewed repre ing Hoisington Group, Inc. 6 2 (6 BRW 2-Hoi ton Group) to commissioners voted- - ~�-ommend hiring BRW as the consultant fir�. H. 1989 Annual Report ' Commissioner Sletten moved to recommend that the ' commission seat held by Al Goj ns , unoccupied due to his-, out-of-town absence for educational purposes, be declared vacant and begin the process of fillinq this seat on the commission. Commissioner ElemApsey seconded yes --A xdahl , Barrettn Cardinal, Dempsey, ' Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten IX.Co SSION PR ENTATIONS Alp Co cil �leetinqs: December 12 and January 9 Frank- Dempsey ~^ ST'AF PRESENTATIONS U~ A JOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 12:12 a.m. I.e ' AGENDA ITEM � ' . Action by Council* AGENDA REPORT . Endorsed- Modifierl— TON City Manager Rejecte Date FROM: Assi.stant City Engineer SUBJECT: Ariel Street from Cope Ave to Castle Avenue, Project 88 -15 --Schedule Public Hearing / . DATEx February 21, 1989 ' The feasibility report for the subject project is hereby transmitted. The attached resolution schedules a public hearing for March 27, 1989. BAI jw Attachment RESOLUTION . . ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLICHEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Ariel Street from Cope Avenue to Castle Avenue, City Project 88-15 by construction of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, associated utilities, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Ariel Street from Cope Avenue to Castle Avenue, City Project 88-15, by construction of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, associated utilities, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will 'consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of thecost of the improvement according toMSAChapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $130,200.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the cit|''hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 27th day of Marchv 1989, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall.give mailed and published notice of said hearing and iinprovement as required by law. TOx FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: . 7 - AGENDA ITEM___��'_�-� AGENDA REPORT Aot1mu by Council:,'. City Manager ---------�-��~�� ModifimdL._~~~~�~� City Engineer Rejected---. Date - Stillwater Water Tower, ProJect 86 -03 --Final Payment February 21, 1989 The Stillwater water tower and appurtenant construction is complete. The contractor is requesting final payment at this time. This project was completed long after the specified completion date. Due to equipment problems and delays, the city's engineer spent extra time inspecting the work. This time amounts to $8,000. It is felt that this cost should be absorbed by the contractor since his delays caused the extra engineering cost. It is recommended that final payment in the amount of $13,395.44 ($21,395.44 less $8,000) be made to Hydrostorage, Inc. KGH jc I AAW FISH ENGINEERS 1 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS February 16, 1989 Mr, Ken Haider, D.P.W. City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr, Haider: 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272 RE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 6 ELEVATED TANK CITY PROJECT NO: 86-03 SEH FILE NO: 86151 All punch list items for the above referenced project have been completed. Attached is the Contractors application for final payment in the amount of $21,395.44. This amount includes the $800.000 deduct for Change Order No. 4 but does not include the $8,000.00 deduct for costs sustained by Maplewood. Hydrostorage, Inc. has objected to the City recovering these costs as detailed in their December 21, 1988 letter (attached). Their reason is that Autocon Industries, who caused the delays, was indirectly specified due to the required compatibility of the new controls to the inplace equipment. Autocon Industries may infact given the lowest bids to Hydrostorage due to their direct compatibility, but the subcontract agreement should have defined Autocon's contractual responsibilities and obligations which were not carried out nor enforced by Hydrostorage. As a result of Autocon's failure to perform and respond to construction related problems the City incurred costs in manually operating the booster station during the control failures. The $8,000.00 represents only costs associated with our work and our subconsultant (EMA) in responding to trouble shooting control problems. This cost does not include our costs related to telephone transmission problems nor costs of City personnel. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN FES 1 7 1389 Mr. Ken Haider, D.P.W. Page #2 February 16, 1989 We recommend the project be accepted and that final payment be made to Hydrostorage, Inc. in the amount of $21,395.44 minus any cost incurred by the City as a result of malperformance on the part of the Contractor. Change order No. 4 should be approved and signed by the City and the amount of previous payment reviewed against City ledgers for accuracy. Sincerely, r David J. Pillatzke, P.E. DJP/cmb Enclosure cc: Mr. Dean Bach, Hydrostorage, Inc. r CHANGE ORDER ENGINEERS 1 ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272 OWNED City of Maplewood, MN DATE 12-08-88 OWNERS PROJECT NO. 86-03 CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 PROJECT E T DESCRIPTION District No* 6 -- Elevated Tank SEH FILE NO. 86151 The following changes shall be made to the contract documents Description: Deletion of four (4) intermediate obstruction lights from elevated tank Delete $800.00 Purpose of Change Order. The lights were deleted since the tank is in a residential area and the lights could be a nuisance.. Basis of Cost: CX Actual o Estimated Attachments (list supporting documents) Contract Status Original Contract Net Change Prior C.O.'s 1 to 3 Change this C.O. Revised Contract Time Cost 11094,000.00 + 18,399-00 800-00 1,111,599*00 Recommended for Approval: Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, lnc. David J. Pillatzke, P. E: Agreed to by Contractor. Approved for Owner: Hydr to age, Inc. City of Maplewood, MN By By CONTRACTING ENGINEER Title By Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative 1 SEH Office 1 SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CNI FF L I 10 A c-? L HENDRICKS-ON INC, MINNESOTA I'VISC 01''4 5" � AGENDA ITEM ' ---'---' Action by Cooncilo . AGENDA REPORT Endoroed~�~�_�=� To: City Manager Modlfled�~~~�~ . Ro�ectad��_�~~~�� FROM: Assistant City Engineer ~ Da~ SUBJECT: Hillcrest Sanitary Sewer, Project 86 -22 --Change Order 5 DATE: February 21, 1989 Change Order 5 for Project 86-22 was approved on September 12, 1988, prior to actual construction on the basis of an estimate of the costs for replacement of street on old McKnight Road between Ivy and Maryland. A copy of the agenda report presented at that time is attached for reference. The project engineer has submitted a final change order based on the actual quantities constructed. The final change order includes several . miscellaneous items in addition to the replacement of old McKnight Road. A letter from the project engineer and the proposed change order are attached. It is .recommended that Change Order 5 be approved. Since the construction is essentially complete, it is appropriate to reduce the retainage to one percent. A resolution for this purpose is attached. BAI jc Attachments ' . - (lj PROJECT NO. FOLDER NO. INITIALS -� AGENDA ITEM -1 1 r AGENDA REPORT C�,:�r TO City Manager F FROM: Assistant City Engineer ____ ..SUBJECT: 'H i l 1 crest Sanitary Sewer, , Project 86 -2? --Change Order F, i Ct.,d • McKnight Road Mar land to Ivy --Cooperative Agreemen Mc �.n g Y est e DATE: September 61 1988 INTRODUCTION The H i l 1 crest ' San i terry Sewer improvement requ i red the removal of the e: i st i ng pavement on "old" McKnight Road between Mary] and Avenue and the railroad traces immediately south of Ivy Avenues ' Due to the time constraints necessitated by .the pl 4tnned construct ion of Mcf=;night Road by Ramsey County, the reconstruction of the roadway was not specified as part of the Hillcrest Sanitary Sewer contract. Proposed agreements with the contractor, Ramsey County Pub l i c Wore s Department staff , and St . F'aul Public Works Department staff have been negotiated. The rat i f i cat i on ' of these proposed agreements is the subject of this report. BACF=::GROUNEi "Old" McK%night Road between Maryland and Ivy is to be given to Maplewood and St. F'aul for ownership and maintenance by Ramsey County after the completion of the new alignment for Mc[:**night Road. ' The basic premise of the tern --back: agreement is that Ramsey County sh ou 1 d turn over an improved road e:: c 1 us i ve of t h e costs Map! ewood would have incurred to restore the road as it previous] y eA.isted . A copy of -the proposed cooperative agreement is attached. The proposed cooperative agreement specifies that Ramsey County will reimburse Maplewood V211037.87, out of t h e total cost of $63,951 ,951 to reconstruct an improved roadway section of 36 feet -Face-to--face bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter and appurtenances. A copy of the proposal f rom the contractor, Minn[-*::ota E.:cavating, is attached as Exhibit .D in the proposed cooperative agreements Mck:night Road between Maryland and Ivy has been a gravel surfaced toad since it was opened to traf f i c l ast f al 1 Al though significant :efforts have been made to maintain the serviceability of the roadway, the users of the road and adjacent residents have endured dust , pothol es , and mud f or about a year . It is right that the roadway be permanently reconstructed prior to winter* However, Ramsey County will not be able to execute the proposed cooperative agreement until late September and City of St. Paul w i l l require until . about early November for rat i f i c at i on of t h e cooperative agreement . If construction is delayed until all L 6 . parties ies have been executed the -cooperative agreement , then weather^ . cond i.t ions would probably be unacceptab l e f or a qual i ty job . .. RECOMMENDATION Tt'is recommended that'the proposed cooperative agreement be approved. A .resol ut ion authorizing execution of the cooperative agreement is attached. Furthermore" it is recommended that the modification of the Hi 1 1 crest Sanitary Sewer , Project 86—:2.2- , contract be made by Change -'Order 5 in the amount of approx imatel y $63.,951 construction cost at -this time. Approval of the change order • prior to the execution of the cooperative agreement by Ramsey County and St. Paul is justified and warranted by the e:: t ens i ve F period during which. the roadway has been unsurfaced and the limited per^iod of acceptable weather left this year. A resolution to modify the construction contract by Change Order is attached. Jc Attachments C♦ Agreement No. 88014 RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MAPLEWOOD AND ST. PAUL Agreement between: Estimated cost The County of Ramsey, to Ramsey Y -- Count $219037,879 , the City of Maplewood. Right of way to be returned to and City of St. Paul respective Cities, Maplewood to and between: I restore street, St. Paul to operate the Cities of Maplewood and maintain street. and St. Paul , Re: Old McKnight Road (County Road 164) from Maryland Avenue to East Ivy Avenue Surface restoration and ownership turnback to 1he respective cities of Maplewood and St,, -'Paul with operation by St. Paul. Ac THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the City of Ma lewoodp Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Maplewood," and by and between the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "St. Paul" and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, McKnight Road (County State Aid Highway No. 68) is being reconstructed on a new alignment under separate cooperative agreements with Maplewood, No. 87007 and St. Paul, No. 87008; and WHEREAS, McKnight Road (County Road 164) from Maryland Avenue at the southeast corner of Section 23, Township 29 N, Range 22 W, to East IvY Avenue 1311.70 feet - north along the east line of Section 23, Township 29 N, Range a 22 Wt hereinafter known as Old McKnight Road will no longer serve a count need (See Exhibit A)•. and y WHEREAS, the, County, Maplewood and St. Paul desire to revoke the County Road status of this portion of Old McKnight Road and turn it back to the cities for operation as a city street; and WHEREAS, the previous surface on Old McKnight Road was in poor shape; and WHEREAS, plans for the relocation of McKnight Road include the reconstruction of Old McKnight Road from the C&NW Railroad north to East Iv Avenue and west on East Iv y Ivy Avenue to match the St. Paul East Ivy Avenue improvement project; and WHEREAS, a Maplewood utility contract has reconstructed theaggregate base, and i WHEREAS, Maplewood has a contractor engaged in their utility project who will complete the proposed reconstruction by change order; and WHEREAS, the reconstructed Old McKnight Road's primary function will be that of a city street. serving primarily St. Paul street needs. NOW,. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED. AS FOLLOWS: 1. Maplewood shall prepare plans, specifications, special provisions and change orders for the reconstruction of Old McKnight Road by their utility contractor Minn - Kota Excavating, Inc. 2. Plans for the proposed improvement shall be reviewed and approved by St. Paul prior to construction. 3. Maplewood shall supervise and inspect the construction and be responsible for all things and costs associated therewith except for the construction cost of bituminous surfacing which shall be paid for by the County. 4. It is estimated that the County cost participation will be $21,038.87 based on the estimatedquantities . and contract unit prices for bituminous surfacing items attached as Exhibit B. 5. St. Paul shall, from time to time, monitor the construction and upon substantial completion of the construction, St. Paul shall review the work and accept in writing its conformance with the intent of the plans and specifications. Items of work not acceptable to St. Paul, shall be identified in writing by St. Paul so that those items may be satisfactorily completed by the contractor, 6. Upon completion of the construction and acceptance by St. Paul, Maplewood shall p all furnish a completed Exhibit B based on the Engineers certification of quantities of materials actually incorporated into the -surfacing, and Maplewood shall then be paid - by the County., . 70, Maplewood shall provide "As Built" plans to St. Paul for the road as reconstructed including all Maplewood utilities within the right of way. 8. The County shall provide to St. Paul copies of all plans and records pertaining to this portion of Old McKngiht Road in its possession. • 9. Upon written acceptance of substantial completion of the work by the St. Paul Director of Public Works, St. Paul shall operate and maintain the reconstructed street with its drainage facilities and boulevards. However the operation and maintenance 'of the remaining utilities within the right of way shall be the responsibility of the respective ownerships: 10. Normal operation and maintenance of Old McKnight Road by St. Paul shall be in consideration of the reconstruction of Old McKnight Road by Maplewood and the County and said operation and maintenance shall be without cost to Maplewood and/or the County. ills St. Paul shall not assess or otherwise recover its operating and maintenance costs from property in Maplewood. 88014 Page 2 of 3 ° 12. Maplewood hereby grants unto St. Paul authority to regulate, permit and administer all things ..necessary for the operation of Old McKnight Road from Maryland Avenue to East'`'Ivy. Avenue as a St. Paul municipal street. 13. Maplewood shall not repair, modify or otherwise alter their utilities within the right of way without first obtaining appropriate permission from St. Paul 14. Future major maintenance and or reconstruction, if necessary, may be performed as agreed to. at such time by St. Paul. and Maplewood. 15. Upon execution of this agreement, acceptance of the construction by St. Paul and payment by the County to Maplewood, the County shall undertake all. actions necessary to revoke the County Road designation of the subject Old McKnight Road. All County interest in the right of way shall be turned back to Maplewood and St. Paul as their respective interests • may appear, and the County will have no further responsibility for said road. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed. CITY OF MAPLWOOD, MINNESOTA THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY By By • Chairperson Its Board of County Commissioners By . Attest; Its Chief Clerk -County Board Date CITY OF ST. PAUL, - MkNESOTA By - - Its By Its Date • Date Approved as to Form: Assistant County Attorney Recommended for approval: Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. Director Ramsey County Public Works Department 88014 Page 3 of 3 U EXHIBIT A No 88014T W4 ., s W cacao END S.�4.P. 62-668-18 ~ � � m 30 LARPENTEUR WON! J AVE. � � v� NAVE. � W one IDAHO AVE. J Lr 29NR22WW � Li AV l' . a � � 14 13- c' 23 24. cat:� CL ' 0 cr '00 68 AVE 4vE. t� ~ S.A.R BRIDGE ?22 62543 AVE* 01 Z r ��GPGO � � �O • �2 � ,ASE, �� . ,. � ���C'�.� ��MAPLEWOOD � i�v f.z) IVY AVE.e0o avE, � �, 68 Trailer 4vE. R- I64 Court 2324 ' P AVE. X2625 MARYLAND J E. �ROSE C� EAANIUm ST. PAU L 1D I E, iESSAaiNf BBC1 er0 BEGIN. S.A.P.S.A.P.62-668-18 AVE �- o -womasmLahe 3: � 'N AVEcc W � AVE. � Q 6E � � 1 V) AVE• = � '� � DC H w a N O O � .��l.� �W.. y O � C� W 32 P WW Z 0P4 J BRAND ST sk S71� to 0 Od o Bituminous Surfacing , 1-i" Bituminous Base 1—itt Bituminous Wear Tack Coat Agreement 88014 F�hWit. B Quantity Unit Costs Estimated Final Price Estimated Final 395 Ton $23.00 = $ 91085.00 407 Ton .25.00 = 10,175.00 231 Gal 2.00 = 462.00 Sub Total = $19 722 00 Total Project Cost Estimated Final $63,951.00 Less Mobilization Sub Total -4 000.00 59,951.00 Less Surfacing Remainder 19 722.00 40,229.00 Pro Rata Share ' of Mobilization . Surfacing $4000 x 19, 722/59,951 = $1,315.87 Estimated x = Final Remainder (Aggregate base, concrete curb & gutter, minor drainage improvements & restoration) $4000 x 40,229/59,951 = $2,684.13 Estimated x = Final Summary rrrrrrrr ■ Ramsey County Costs for Surfacing Estimated Final Surfacing Items $19,722.00 ProRata Mobilization Total 11315,87 $21,037o87 Maplewood Costs' for' Remainder (Aggregate, curb & gutter, drainage,& restoration) .. :: Sub Total $40,229.00 Pro Rata Mobilization 21684.13 Total $42,913.13 .. r $63,951.00 • • • .. o es • t EXHIBIT B Sheet 2 E CEl:'E. D AUG 41988 8/1/88 ' PROPOSAL HILLCREST TRUNK SANITARY S • E;WER PROJECT NO: 86-22 SEH FILE NO: 87113 MCKNIGHT ROAD BETWEEN MARYLAND& RAILROAD . 3 6 ' WIDE.RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL . STR EET WITH B6-24 CURB &GUTTER ITEM - QUANTITY �of3it.Jxq�-�,aN UNIT UNIT .. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT �� 12 R.C.P. CL V ! L.S. �ooa. oo Tqo oc� .00 904 L.F. Z6 Z�o32. o0 CATCH BASIN W/CASTING (R -3067V) 2 EACH i000.00 Z.000•00 MANHOLE. W/CASTING (R -3067V) 1 EACH D th D.00 (foo . 00 CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE OR CATCH BASIN 2 EACH 200.00 �oc� • o0 BITUMINOUS CURB 120 L.F. Z••7S . Z�p _ � • ov 3 O B6-24 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ... • 209 5 '' L.F. (o.�o t3y08 „ • 4 CONCRETE WALK 95 S•F 1.90 •°0 CONCRETE "V" GUTTER I' .- EACH poca. o 3 � 8 0 . 2.0 3000.c�o CONCRETE DRIVEWAY • 6" .THICK 76 TON Z,S•oo AGGREGATE BASE CL 5 263 TON Q. 5o _ Zq9 E3. S0 1-1/2" BITUMINOUS BASE 395 TON 23.00 _ q o � �• o0 �� 1-1/2 BITUMINOUS WEAR 407 TON-- 25.01 J0 !? .vo TACK COAT . 231 GAL. 2.00 _ � � •z.00 SOD .31500 S.Y. 2.00 �►Qao . o0 SEED ` � Pia P94owqi,, 0.1 00 ACRE 80000 v . - - 0 �, S c, t o • •oma • TOTAL: HID UNIT PRICES EXCEPT FOR ITEMS MARKED BY* SUBMITTEDHY: ONTRA R /h//vN 4t;rA vAroq �% PRTc�s uo-�-�p ASE- 0 y Id y 4 RESOLUTION AP'P'ROVING COOPERATIVE -AGREEMENT WITH RAMSEY COUNTY AND ST . PAUL WHEREAS the city eng i neer hes presented Cooperative Agreement Number 88014 concerning the restoration and ownership .turn--bacif of McKnight Road between Maryland Avenue and, Ivy Avenue, and WHEREAS ,. the city engineer has recommended the cooperative agreement for approval NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT -RESOLVED BY -THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAF'LEW001:1 , MINNESOTA that the mayor and city c 1 erg; ' are hereby author i ed to execute said cooperative agreement . -e ^� RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has her^etof are ordered made Improvement Project 86- � and has i et a construction contrLAct pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4^9; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 - Ch an g e Order 54. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD , MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby author^ i -Zed : and directed to modify the e:: i st i ng contract by executing sa-i d Change Order 5. r 122EA51 Li1Itf c AIVA()A ROAU, 51 PAW. M1NNES01A S 511 612 484.0271 RE: Maplewood, Minnesota Hillcrest Trunk Sanitary Sewer Project 86-22 SEH File No. 87113 City of Maplewood 1830 County Road 8 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 • ATTN: Mr. Ken Haider Dear Mr. Haider: Enclosed are: 1. Application for Payment No. 1 1 . 2. Five copies of CO #5 (please return P 3 signed copies when approved) . 3. Letter from Minn-Kota's Bonding Company. P Y- To the best of our • knowledge all quantities shown on the application are final. This includes quantities listed for Change Orders 1 through 5% Previous quantities on Change Order 1 through 5 were estimated. The Contract is not being fina-led at this time because sodding and seeding was installed late in the season. We believe the City should retain some amount to cover repairs that . spring a P at may be needed in the s p g f ter the growing season begins, Accordingly, we recommend payment of this application why ch includes 1 percent retainage amounting to $86357-63. Sincerely, Donald G. Christoffersen DGC / me Enclosures. )lA W'IV t )N51N FFR 1 8 1VQ i DER QRCHANGE . ENGINEERS Al ARCHITECTS t PLANNERS 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484-0272 a Cit of Maplewood DATE January 111�19�39 OWNER y OWNERS PROJECT NO. 86-22 CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 PROJECT DESCRI rT10N Hi 11 crest Trunk Sanitary Sewer SEH FILE NO. 87113 The following changes shall be made to the contract documents Description: * 1. Construct McKnight Road between Plaryl and & R/R tracks 2. Remove' unusable material from wetland 3. Replace sanitary s ewer services 4. Remove & rel ay existing 24" storm sewer * See Supplement Purpose of Change Order.- Establish rder.Establish unit prices and amounts Basis of Cost: cX Actual o Estimated Attachments (list supporting documents) Contract Status Original Contract & application item adjustments Net Change Prior C.O.s to Change this C. 0. Revised Contract Recommended for Approval: Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc. Agreed to by Contractor: Approvcu ► u► ►c► . Mi -nn -Kota Excavating., Inc. Time Cost 757 ,886.00 .11,413.17 66,463.97 .limp 1 1 4AA RIS 7AI 1 d By By Title - - BY Distribution SHORT ELLIOTT r ry r l lit INC. Contractor 2 Owner l Project Representat: t o 1 SEN OffiCe 1 ,,; T PA ! %L, r SUPPLEMENT TO CHANGE ORDER #5 HILLCREST TRUNK SANITARY SEWER PROJECT NO: 86-22 SEH FILE NO, 87113 1. McKnight Road residential street 36' wide with concrete curb and gutter. Description Unit Est,, Final Unit Total of Item Qty. Qty. Price MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 11438 $4000.00 $ 4575.00 12" RCP CL V L.F. 94 146 28.00 .4088.00 CATCH BASIN W CAST, EA, 2 4 1000.00 4000.00 MANHOLE W CASTING EA, 1 1 1600.00 1600.00 CONNECT TO EXIST EA, 2 2 200.00 400.00 BITUMINOUS CURB L.F. 120 52 2.75 143.00 B6-24 CONE CURB & GUTTER L.F. 2095 2150 6.40 13760.00 4" CONCRETE WALK S.F. 95 432 1.90 820.00 CONCRETE "V" GUTTER EA, 1 0 3000.00 -- 6" CONCRETE DRWAY. S.Y. 76 88.6 25.00 2215.00 AGGREGATE BASE CL5 TON 263 114.68 9.50 1089.46 1 1/2" BIT. BASE TON 395 369 23.00 8487.00 1 1/2" BIT., WEAR TON 407 400.44 25.00 10011.00 TACK COAT . ' GAL 231 235 2.00 470.00 SOD S:Y. 3500 1.100 2.00 2200.00 SEED AC 1.0 0.1 800.00 800.00 TOPSOIL BORROW C.Y. 400 341 13.00 4433.00 $59092.26 2. Remove unsuitable material from wetland as directed by Field Order # 1 Work performed on December 11, 1987 and April 7, 8 and 12, 1988. Negotiated Amount $2676.63 3. Replace 6" sanitary sewer services as requested by owner. Negotiated Amount $3566.58 4. Remove and relay existing 24" storm sewer torovide clearance ce for ne sanitary sewer. Item Quantity Unit Unit Amount Backhoe & Operator 6 Hrs. $130.00 $ 780.00 Pipelayer 6 Hrs-, 20.00 120.00 Foreman w pickup 2 Hrs. 45.00 90.00 Fee 148.50 Total Amount $ 1138.50 Total Amount Change Order ##5 $66463.97 ` . RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement project 86-22 and has let a construct'on contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86-22 Change Order 5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MA'LEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized.and diret-ted to modify the existing contract by . executing said Change Order 5. FURTHERMORE, reduction of retainage for Project 86-22 to one percent is authorized. y l MEMORANDUM j TO a Citi n er~ Action by Councilla a y FF -Z011: City Engineer ��da��ed� y Modified 'OUBJECT tt Remote Water Me -ter Contract Date.. 1:1 A. -F E February 21 1989 St p Paul Wat er Ut i 1 i t y is requesting Maplewood enter into an agreement to install r^emote--r eading water meters. 1 -he instal l ation woUl d be made by St a Paul at their cast . The agreement commits Maplewood to buy the equipment if we someday switch to a whol esal e -type contract . Approval of the contract is recommended. E:::CH jw February 10, 1989 Mr. Ken Haider City Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B I Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Remote Meter Program for Maplewood Dear Mr. Haider: Enclosed are three copies of an agreement for installing Remote Metering Systems in the city of Maplewood. At the present time, only the cities of Maplewood and Lauderdale have not returned their signed agreement. We look forward to Maplewood's favorable response on the Remote Meter Program. If I can assist or answer any questions regarding the Remote, Meter Program, please call me at 298-4166. VEJ / kf encls. \0 Yours very truly, n Verne E. Jacobsen Secretary - Board of Water commissioners 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 BERNIE R. BULLERT Supt. of Water Distribution ROGER A. MOHROR Water Production Engineer I r DISTRIBUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA fY�,a• � i j' j R: r� :. r I• �,� � Y)�C� 777 4 1 }tn F 1;� �� t •'If BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS ni7s'l�. �Fj �� F t � r! Y ` HOMAS;D. MOGREN ROGER J. GOSWITZ, PRESIDENT General M. ag r I DEBORAH Y. BACHRACH, VICE PRESIDENT VERNE EST S EN ,•, : i AssiStntG kiqnager } , .:. ,, ry� T- --- --- , s �a �': RAYMON(.. EYLER r <' t THOMAS R. DIMOND z; }'d �tY, ;�N:��yi�y Y'�.��i�„w��'YY�•T ;''�tr ��ii �+��ry?,'� 4i •Y'1fe+.:. �i �r� .e ► f ���y �'°^9��!''r""-�"gNri+rnR ��'li�l'�;,'F^. l.F". - ',yy �y ?t `fix¢ ,�� o,� >: �•• �_ , A� r KIKI SONNEN . ', ;:ft M y { j `� i �. .r G. ��'��t. A .r. 1•.�}r/.��j.A• —••S ...^prN•.. - .. ,t . , 1 � �•^ 5..µn' .. .. `ry; �,.1�� �_ _ ; .. .F�1=F /��5: PUMPINGLAKES RIVER - TREATMENTISSISSIPPI . February 10, 1989 Mr. Ken Haider City Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B I Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Remote Meter Program for Maplewood Dear Mr. Haider: Enclosed are three copies of an agreement for installing Remote Metering Systems in the city of Maplewood. At the present time, only the cities of Maplewood and Lauderdale have not returned their signed agreement. We look forward to Maplewood's favorable response on the Remote Meter Program. If I can assist or answer any questions regarding the Remote, Meter Program, please call me at 298-4166. VEJ / kf encls. \0 Yours very truly, n Verne E. Jacobsen Secretary - Board of Water commissioners 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 BERNIE R. BULLERT Supt. of Water Distribution ROGER A. MOHROR Water Production Engineer I r DISTRIBUTION v 1 . I.nstal l ati on Schedule: To accommodate the Water Utility's meter reading and billing cycles, the following installation schedule shall be maintained: Meter Approximate Calendar Dates Route Routes for Quantity of for Providing Group Meter Conversion Installations Meter Installations *I Saint Paul III J1 -J34 39900 .ralcon Heights, Saint Paul. Lauderdale Al, A6-A8,--A23-A42 29240 . Subtotal 62140 Saint Paul V19 V29 V4, V6 -V349 42540 ' V3602 V383 V411 V459 V48 Maplewood K273 K29 -K32, L29, L311 L33 -L38, S34 -S36, .S46, S47 S53, S549 S56, 1252 T31 -T362 V3, V59 V359 V379 V392 V401 V42 -V44, V46, V479 V49-'162 59390 . Subtotal - 9.193U 'Test St. Paul Q6, Q15, Q17 -Q33, R17, R20 -R23, R24 -R27, R33 . R35 -R529 R59, R60 4,385 Mendota Heights R28 -R321 R34, R53 -R58 R0' -1-R70 2,345 Subtotal 6,730 . TOTAL 22,800 - 4 - 1/03/89 to 4/28/89 5/01/89 to 8/05/89 8/07/89 to 10/28/89 CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR REMOTE METERING SYSTEMS This Contract Agreement made and entered into this day of 1988, by and between the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, a municipal utility located in Ramsey County, Minnesota, hereinafter called the "Board" and the City of a municipal corporation located in. County, Minnesota, hereinafter called "City". WITNESSETH: That the said parties, in consideration of mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, have agreed to and with each other as follows: 1. Term of Contract: This Contract Agreement shall be for a term of 31 years from the date of execution hereof, unless terminated earlier as herein- after provided. 2. Remote MetSystems,: a. A remote metering system consists of a water meter, a remote meter reading receptacle and a connecting cable. The.Board agrees to furnish and install remote metering systems for all water service accounts 4 i thin the City which a-,(-- two (2) inch and smaller in size. b. The Board shall furnish, install and retain title to all the remote metering systems with full responsibility to maintain the systems in accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Board and in effect within the City of Saint Paul. Should the City convert to the purchase of water at whole- sale from the Board or develop an alternate rater supply sys}em for the City, then and in that case all remote metering systems shall be purchased by City from the Board. Payment shall be made to the Board in accordance with the following provision and tendered to the Board within 90 days after the alternate water system is implemented by the City. c. The price to be paid shall be determined by the actual cost of furnishing and installing the remote metering system as of the actual date of installation, and shall include labor, equipment, material and overhead. These costs shall be amortized at an annual rate of 3.33 percent based upon a service life of 30 years. For illustration purposes only, if the system had been installed in 1987, actual remote metering system costs would have been as follows: - 5/8" — 3/4" Remote Metering System 96.71 3/4" Remote Metering System 109.06 1 " Remote Metering System 130.01 1 1/2" Remote Metering System 280.36 ,2" Remote Metering System 337.86 3. Supplement to Agreements: This*Contract Agreement is supplemental to any other existing agreement which may exist between the City and the Board, and is intended to apply only to the installation and maintenance of the remote metering systea.s being install.zd by the Board for convenience of the Board and the properties served by it. 4. Effective Date of Contract: The date of making and entering into this Contract Agreement. and the date of execution thereof shall be the date when the Director of the Department of Finance of the City of Saint Paul countersigns this document. This Contract Agreement shall not be binding. upon either party until the same has been accepted by resolution of the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul, the Council of the City of Saint Paul, and the Council of the City of - 2 - IN WITNESSWHEREOF, The parties hereto have executed these presents in triplicate the day and year first above Written. . CITY OF MINNESOTA By Mayor By City Manager ' BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF APPROVED: THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA By Thomas D. Mogren, General Manager Roger J. Gosuitz, President By Verne E. Jacobsen, Secretary Approved as to form: COUNTERSIGNED: Assistant City Attorney Eugene A. Schiller, Director of Finance and Management Services