Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 10-23 & 10-26 City Council PacketA MMIDED AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P*m*9 Monday, October 23, 1989 and 4 :30 P.M., Thursday, October 26, 1989 Council Chambers, Mun .cipa". Building No. 89 -2Meeting 4 A. CALL TO ORDER B POLL CALL C • APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1 • Minutes of Meet - ng No. 89 -13 (June 82. M+nutes of Meeting _ and 12, 1989) Jo. 89 22 (October 9 and 12, 1989) (Coes wilfortheOctober26, 1989 Meeting) P . 1 be available 30 m nutes, Special. Council. Meetings Octobersober 4, 1989 . D • APPROVAL OF AGENIDA E. CONSYNT AGENDA 1 ApprovQ7. of Claims 2, Time Ex-tens --Lon: Beaver Creek Apartments34T--',me Extensi on: Torgerson Addition40TimeExtension: Hazel Ridge P.U.D. 50 Gond i t.onal Use P ermit Renewal: Highway 61 (Frattal.one) 6. Conditional Use Perm-it Renewal: . 2683 Geranium Avenue (Hecht el.; 7. Change Order 1 - Brooks Avenue Projectect 88--Q83• Payment of Parking Area .i n Pleasantview ParkF:.na: Payment: Pa. rating Interior of Co e -$- 1Q. Budget Transfer: Legal p Avenue Wate Tank F* PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M*, Roseiawn Avenue, T.H. 49 to Jackson, . son, Pro,lect $7 -01 (4 Votes) 2 • 7:45 P • M. , Al.ley Vacation and Pre1. i ' m3nary Plat: Sheryl's Addition 3* 8:00 P.M., Variance: 1780 County Road D (Da- y s Inn) 4. 80-15 P. M* , 2271 White Bear Avenue (Fleming) a. C.D.R.B. Appeal b. Conditional Use Permit 5* 8 :45 P.M*, Conditional Use Permit: 2207 McAfee Circle 6. 9:00 P.M., , Cond-.it_.ona"]. Use Permit: 1357 Coe Avenue ' p e ue (Corner Kick) 7 • 4 :15 P. M. , White Bear and 11th Avenues (Amoco oil a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Rezoning (4 Votes) C* Lot Div.is 1_on Go AWARD OF BIDS H. UNFIT-;ISHED BUSI?FESS 1. Ban on New 14otor Fue:, Stations 2. Pre 1 ir-sina ry Plat:, Seasons Park 3. C.D.R.B. Appeal: 2714 Highwood Avenue (Carver) 4. Preli.m.inary and Final Plat Reconsideration: Wo odlynn Heights Townhomes No. 4 Nettleton) 5. Environmental Protection Ordinance a. Code Amendment (2nd Reading) b Resolution (Application Fee For Woodlot Alteration Permit) 6. 1iorator -1_ur1 on yew. Pre l.iinary Plat Applications Z. ITTH BUSIITESS 1 • Registered Land Survey: Highway 61 and Kohl man Avenue (Bartlett) 20 Code Amendment: Truth -In --Sale of Housing (1st Reading) 3. C.D.R.B. Appeal: English Place (English Street & Highway 36) 4. Schedule Public Hear-.ng : Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87-32 5. Schedule Public Hearing: Roselawn Avenue, I-35E to Arcade, Project 89-03 6. Meeting Schedule for Balance of Year. 7. Request for Stop Sign: City He.A*-ghts Drive and Summer. S. Review Code Ordinance Sec. 2-23, City Council Compensation J. VISITOR PRE S EINTAT TONS Ke COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 20 3* 4* 50 6* To 80 90 1011 Lo ADI MINI STRATI'VE PRESENTATIONS 1. R.V. Ordinance Discussion 20 30 4* 50 M. ADJOUPIDIENT OF MEETING MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 4:30 P.M., Thursday, June 8, 1989 and 7:00 P.M., Monday, June 12, 1989 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 89 -13 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 4:32 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Arrived at 4:43 P.M. Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Absent C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 89 -2 (January 23, 1989) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 89 -2 (January 23, 1989) as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Council /Park Board Meeting 2. Ramp on Highway 694 3. Old City Hall Plaque 4. Dirt on Streets 5. Recycling: Plastic 6. Dog Ordinance 7. Meeting with Manager 8. Maplewood Mall 9. Edgerton Street 10. Easements 11. Bulk Storage 12. Garbage Fees 13. Add: Reschedule 6 -15 -89 Workshop Session 14. Place Code Amendment 14 -4 before Item H -2 15. Storm Water Area Tour with Engineer Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 1 06 -08 -89 E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Anderson moved, seconded by Mayor Greavu, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda Items E -1 through E -6 as recommended: 1. Approval of Claims Approved the Claims as follows: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 363,933.74 Checks #6440 - #6515 Dated 05 -12 -89 thru 05 -31 -89 90,211.91 Checks #1010 - #1145 Dated 06 -08 -89 ' 454,145.65 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: 170,044.13 Payroll Checks 32.542.58 Payroll Deductions 202,586.71 Total Payroll 656,732.36 GRAND TOTAL 2. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1810 County Road B (Fulk) Approved the renewal of a conditional use permit for one year for a machine shop within 350 feet of a residential district at 1810 East County Road B, subject to Council's previously imposed conditions. 3. Planning Commission's Resignation Accepted the resignation of Frank Dempsey from the Planning Commission and apssed the following resolution. Resolution No. 89 -6 -83 WHEREAS, Frank Dempsey has been a member of the Planning Commission of Maplewood Minnesota, since January 25, 1988, and has served faithfully in that capacity until April 17, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience, insights, and good judgment; and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and 2 06 -08 -89 WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed his leadership, time, and effort for the benefit of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Frank Dempsey is hereby extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him continued success in the future. 4. Time Extension: Cave's English Street Second Addition Approved a one year time extension for Cave's English Street Second Addition planned unit development subject to the original conditions of approval. 5. Donations to Maplewood Nature Center Accepted the $50.00 donation from the Lawrence Kaiser Auxiliary -Post 8901, and the 200.00 donation from the Weaver Elementary School, and place them in the Jim's Prairie Fund (403- 814- 323 - 4720). 6. Resolution - National Night Out - 1989 Resolution 89 -6- 84 WHEREAS, the National Town Watch Association is sponsoring the 6th Annual edition of a special, coast -to -coast community crime prevention event on August 8, 1989, called "National Night Out" - America's Night Out Against Crime; and WHEREAS, Maplewood plays an essential role assisting the Maplewood Police through its cooperative crime prevention efforts in Maplewood and is supporting the "National Night Out" locally; and WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens in Maplewood be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and the positive impact that their participation can have on reducing crime and drug abuse in our neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, "National Night Out" provides an opportunity for Maplewood to join together with thousands of other communities across the country in support of safer neighborhoods and to demonstrate the success of cooperative crime prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, neighborhood awareness, spirit and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out" project and key components in helping the Maplewood Police Department to fight crime and drug abuse; NOW, THEREFORE, WE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, do hereby call upon all of the Citizens of Maplewood to join the Maplewood Police Department and the National Town Watch Association in supporting and participating in the 6th Annual "National Night Out" on August 8th. FURTHER, LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT I, THE MAYOR OF MAPLEWOOD, do hereby proclaim Tuesday, August 8, 1989, as "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" in Maplewood, Minnesota. 3 06 -08 -89 F. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Walter Street, Project 84 -14 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report,. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the bids. Councilmember Bastian arrived at 4:43 P.M. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution 89 -6- 85 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Ro -So Contracting in the amount of $43,768.75 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Walter Street, Fenton Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 84- 14, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. Councilmember Bastian abstained. 2. City Vehicles a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mavor Greavu Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Plan Amendment - Gervais Avenue (BBY Partnership) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. City Attorney Kelly advised the Council of the procedures that can be taken c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. Resolution 89 -6 -97 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS DENYING APPLICATION OF BBY INVESTORS FOR A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, BBY Investors, a Minnesota general partnership, hereinafter BBY, has, on or about October 3, 1988, made application to the City of Maplewood, hereinafter City, for an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehensive Land Use Plan, hereinafter CLUP, a 4 06 -08 -89 Conditional Use Permit, hereinafter CUP, for a Planned Unit Development, hereinafter PUD, and Community Design Review Board, hereinafter CDRB, approval of a 426 unit multi- family housing development on approximately 31 acres lying north of Gervais Avenue and being legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 1, Mapleridge Mall; and the East half and West half of Lot 1, E.G. Roger's Garden Lots; and Lot 2, except the South 300 feet thereof, E.G. Roger's Garden Lots, hereinafter the subject property; and WHEREAS, the CLUP designation for the subject property is LSC, limited service commercial, and the zoning code designation is LBC, limited business commercial, and BBY seeks an amendment of the CLUP from LSC to RH, residential high- density; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the BBY application is as follows: 1. BBY's application was dated, filed and initiated October 3, 1988; and 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission denied the CLUP amendment and CUP request on November 21, 1988, based upon the following: a. The developer [BBY] does not consider Mr. Kavanaugh's property to the west; b. The developer [BBY] has not shown the need for development of rental property on this site; c. Traffic problems would be created on Highway 36; and d. The developer [BBY] has not shown a phasing plan for the gradual development of the property; and 3. The CDRB approved the BBY plans date - stamped November 19, 1988, on November 29, 1988, subject to approval of a CLUP amendment and approval of a CUP by the City Council; and 4. A public hearing before the City Council on the BBY application was held December 12, 1988, but, because of the lateness of the hour, was continued to January 5, 1989; and 5. BBY subsequently requested an indefinite continuance of the public hearing beyond January 5, 1989, to facilitate extension of their option to purchase the subject property; and 6. A public hearing before the City Council on BBY's application was held and concluded March 2, 1989; and 7. At the conclusion of said March 2, 1989, public hearing, it was moved and seconded to approve the amendment of the CLOP from LSC to RH, which motion failed, o ayes 5 nays; and 8. Immediately upon taking the vote to approve amendment of the CLUP, the City Council adjourned, without more; and 5 06 -08 -89 9. On March 13, 1989, the City Council passed a motion to reconsider its action on BBY's application pursuant to 6(d) of the Maplewood City Council Rules of Procedure; and 10. On March 20, 1989, BBY initiated a lawsuit against the City seeking, among other things, to restrain the City Council from reconsidering its prior action on BBY's application; and 11. On March 27, 1989, BBY moved the Ramsey County District Court for a Temporary Restraining Order, hereinafter TRO, prohibiting the City Council from reconsidering its action on BBY's application, which motion the Court took under advisement; and 12. On March 27, 1989, while the District Court deliberated the BBY motion for a TRO, the Maplewood City Council reconsidered its previous action on the BBY application by adopting a motion to deny said amendment to the CLUP and referring to its staff the responsibility of drafting a proposed set of findings based upon the contemporaneous record and documentation; and 13. On March 28, 1989, the Ramsey County District Court entered its TRO restraining the City from approving and /or adopting findings on BBY's application and setting a hearing on a temporary injunction for April 21, 1989; and 14. On May 22, 1989, the Ramsey County District Court dissolved the TRO dated March 28, 1989, permitting, therefore, the adoption of these findings and conclusion. NOW, THEREFORE, upon all the records, files, documents, testimony, and the arguments of counsel, the Maplewood City Council being fully advised, makes the following: ISVIG UI*V1101341 1. That 426 units of high density multi - family housing proposed on this 31 acre tract is incompatible with the immediate contiguous land uses to the northwest, the west, and the south. 2. That to amend the CLUP from LSC to RH would render the CLUP designation in conflict with the official controls of the zoning ordinance and therefore illegal. 3. That the representations of BBY as to traffic impact from the proposed project upon traffic on Gervais Avenue, White Bear Avenue, and TH 36 are inconsistent with the knowledge and experience of the Council. 4. That BBY failed to establish that there has been a substantial change in circumstances as to the subject property and surrounding neighborhood as to warrant amending the CLUP from LSC to RH. 5. That BBY failed to establish that there was an erroneous basis for the 6 06 -08 -89 amendment of the CLUP in 1983 as to the subject property when said CLUP was amended from RH to LSC, consistent with the zoning thereon. 6. That BBY failed to establish that the City had any housing needs that BBY's proposal would satisfy. 7. That the mere reference to housing objectives as set forth in CLUP are insufficient and inadequate to justify an amendment thereto. 8. That the mere expenditure by BBY of time and money in preparation of this application and development plans is, by itself, insufficient and inadequate to provide a rational basis for a CLUP amendment. 9. That the present CLUP designation and zoning classification will result in a commercial use of the subject property thereby expanding the City's tax base without a corresponding demand for increased municipal services. Upon the above -cited findings of fact, the City Council makes the following: CONCLUSION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD: 1. That the application of BBY for an amendment of the CLUP from LSC to RH is hereby denied. 2. That the application of BBY for a CUP for a PUD is hereby denied because the Council cannot make the first finding required thereunder that the proposed use is conformity with the City's CLUP. 3. That the burden of proof for the necessity of an amendment to the CLUP is that of the applicant and has not been met here. 4. That the 1983 amendment of the CLUP as it pertains to the subject property was valid and BBY's challenge thereto is untimely and without standing. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 2. Fish Creek Estates: a. Three Code Variations b. Approval of a "Relaxed Urban" Street Design c. Preliminary Plat 1. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 2. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 3. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the application for preliminary plat 7 06 -08 -89 rrDnl wnrl Il.+.e nlr Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. Revocation of Permit - House Recreational Vehicle a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. The following persons presented their opinions regarding the recreational vehicle permit: David Edsfall, 312 Forest Avenue Jeff House, 2090 East County Road D David Supon, 3050 Hazelwood c. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this Item until Mondav night' Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. H. NEW BUSINESS 1. 1990 -1994 Capital Improvement Plan (4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to table this Item for two weeks until the meeting of June 22, 1989. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. Code Amendment - Pipeline Setback (First Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. c. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. d. Councilmember Bastian moved to amend the Proposed ordinances by adding subsections to 9.218. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian; Nays - Councilmember Juker. e. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance amending the pipeline setback ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 8 06 -08 - 891! `'' 2. Pipeline Setback Variance Lot 15, Block 2, Hills and Dales Addition - Duluth and unction. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the request. c. Bernard Heroff, 2137 Duluth Place commented on the request. d. Mayor Greavu moved to table for staff to investigate the possibility of Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Pipeline Setback Variance - Maplewood Meadows a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Bruce Mogren, representing the developers of Maplewood Meadows spoke on behalf of their request. c. Mayor Greavu moved to table for two weeks. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 5. Southlawn Traffic a. Manager McGuire requested this item he tabled for two weeks. b. Councilmember Juker moved to table Item H -5 for two weeks. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. White Bear Avenue and Burke Street - Street Light Request a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Council instructed staff to request Northern States Power Company to install the street light at White Bear and Burke. Councilmember Bastian left the meeting at 7:15 P.M. 7. Time Extension: Home Occupation (2095 Larpenteur Avenue) a. Manager McGuire stated the applicant has requested this be tabled until Monday's meeting. 8. Motor Fuel Station Moratorium a. Councilmember Juker moved to extend the motor fuel station moratorium until August 28, 1989. 9 06 -08 -89 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson Ayes - all. b. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. 9. City Clean Up Day a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. No action taken. 10. Cable -- History of Maplewood a. Manager McGuire stated Councilmember Anderson wishes that the history of Maplewood be on Cable TV. b. Councilmember Anderson Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 11. Code Amendment: Off- Street Parking (First Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance amending the City's parking design reouirements. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson; Nay - Councilmember Juker. 12. Reschedule June 5, 1989, meeting a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved that the joint meeting with the Council, Planning Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission be rescheduled to June 29, 1989, 6:00 P.M.. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. I. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Council /Park Board Meeting a. Councilmember Anderson stated his concerns can be discussed at the 6 -29 -89 meeting. One of his concerns is if there is enough parking at the City's park sites 2. Ramp on Highway 694 a. Councilmember Anderson was at the Maplewood Mall and all the new development around the Mall, the City has better look into easier access to Maplewood especially 10 06 -08 -89 entering Maplewood from the ramp at 694. His concerns are also when the semi phones at various locations in the area are not functioning. 3. Old City Hall Plaque a. Councilmember Anderson stated there is a plaque hanging in Old City Hall. Shouldn't it be removed. b. Staff will retrieve the plaque. 4. Dirt on Streets a. Councilmember Anderson is concerned with the dirt put on streets by developers. b. Staff will investigate. 5. Recycling - Plastics a. Councilmember Anderson stated Maplewood should join the other cities and ban plastic containers. b. Council directed this item be placed on the next agenda. 6. Dog Ordinance a. Councilmember Anderson stated dogs are running constantly. b. Staff will investigate. 7. Storm Water Area Tour with Engineers a. Councilmember Anderson stated he would like the Council to take a tour of the storm water areas. b. Staff will set a date. 8. Meeting with Manager a. Councilmember Juker questioned when the Council will meet with the Manager. b. Councilmember Juker stated she will table this discussion until Monday night meeting. 9. Maplewood Mall a. Councilmember Juker stated there was a police officer stationed at the Mall, since that officer retired will another be assigned to that duty. b. Staff stated another officer has already been assigned to that duty. 10. Edgerton Street 11 06 -08 -89 a. Councilmember Juker questioned if something is being done at 2177 Edgerton b. Staff is proceeding. 11. Easements No discussion. 12. Bulk Storage a. Councilmember Juker questioned why Bulk Storage did not provide a bond when required to do so for the construction and for clean up of the property. b. Staff will investigate. 13. Garbage Fees a. Mayor Greavu requested staff to research what license garbage haulers charge their customers or various rates. b. Staff stated the City can publish the list of contractors but not the rates. J. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Code Review - R -3 District No discussion. K. ADJOURNMENT OF JUNE 8, 1989 MEETING. 7:30 P.M. L. RECONVENE: CALL JUNE 12, 1989 MEETING TO ORDER M. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued) 3. Revocation of Permit - House: Recreational Vehicle Permit a. Manager McGuire stated this item had been tabled from the June 8, 1989 meeting to allow time for Councilmember Bastian to meet with residents. b. Councilmember Bastian stated he had not been able to establish a meeting date 12 06 -08- 89/06- 12 -89' with the residents and moved this Item be tabled to June 22, 1989. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7. Time Extension: Home Occupation (2095 East Larpenteur Avenue) a. Manager McGuire stated the applicant has asked this be tabled for two weeks. b. Mayor Greavu moved to table this Item until the June 22 1989. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. N -A PRESENTATIONS 1. Parks and Recreation Commission a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks and Recreation Odegard presented the Parks and Recreation Commission report. c. Cathy J. Tollefson, 2587 Pond Avenue, one of the applicants, answered questions from the Council. d. Mayor Greavu Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. e. Michael D. Fieberger, 498 Morris, the applicant, answered questions from the Council. f. Mayor Greavu moved to appoint Michael D. Fieberoer to the term ending December 31, 1989. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. N. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Geranium /Ferndale Storm Sewer Project 87 -21 - Assessment Hearing a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the adoption of the proposed assessment roll for the Geranium /Ferndale Storm Sewer Project 87 -21. b. City Attorney Patrick Kelly explained the procedures for the public hearing to adopt the assessment roll. c. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal. 13 06 -12 -89 e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Mary Jane Schuller, 2648 Geranium Avenue Guy Peterson, 2707 Geranium Avenue Bernadine Mortenson, 2638 Geranium Avenue William DeMoully, 2645 Geranium Avenue g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Bastian moved to deny the assessment procedures and refer it to staff for alternatives to assessments. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson and Bastian; Nags - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Juker. Motion failed. i. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this Item until June 26. 1989, when there will be a full Council. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 2. 7:10 P.M. Rezoning (4 Votes) and Preliminary Plat: C. Little Addition. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Alan Kretman, Gemstone Development, Inc., to rezone the property on County Road B west of Arcade Street and for preliminary plat approval for 25 single family lots. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson and Director of Public Works presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Commissioner Lorraine Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Al Kretman, Architect, and Dennis Peck, developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. g. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following were heard: Resident, 688 East County Road B Terry Petersen, 2190 Payne Avenue Doug Apsahl, 2182 Payne Avenue Lester from Wayne and Janice Frankenberg, 696 East County Road B h. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 14 06 -12 -89 '` i. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. 89 -6 -86 WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Gemstone Development Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 15, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 12, 1989, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter. The subdivision meets all ordinance requirements. 2. The proposed rezoning does not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood. The proposal respects the use of the adjacent property and is reasonably consistent in terms of lot size and width with such adjoining properties. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, and the general public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon or result in any change to the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. All but on- site.public utilities are already in place and drainage is adequately accommodated. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. j. Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the preliminary_ plat of C. Little 1. Final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans must be approved by the City Engineer. 2. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be designated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. 15 06 -12 -89 Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied. with. 3. Submit a signed developer's agreement with required surety for all required public improvements, erosion control, and tree planting to the City Engineer. This agreement shall include a requirement for the placement of temporary fencing, during construction, around trees to be saved. 4. Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community development before grading or construction begins or final plat approval is given. This plan must designate the trees that are to be removed, those that are to be retained, and those that are to be replanted. 5. The provision of on and off -site drainage easements as required by the City Engineer. 6. Revise "Kenwood Drive" to "Greenbriar Court ". 7. Restriction placed in agreement that recreational vehicles must be garaged. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 3. 7:20 P.M., conditional Use Permit: 1580 Sterling Street (Jamieson) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting pertaining to a request of Donald and Colleen Jamieson, 1580 Sterling, for approval of a conditional use permit to construct an addition to their home over the existing garage. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. d. Donald Jamieson, 1580 Sterling, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents or opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Donald and Colleen Jamieson initiated a conditional use permit for construction of an addition over the existing garage at the following described property: Ex N 80 feet, Lots 10 and 11, Block 2, Bradley Oaks 16 06- 12 -89` This property is also known as 1580 Sterling Street North, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on June 5, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 8, 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained, and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental; or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises; glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 17 06 -12 -89 1. This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. 2. All code requirements shall be met. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 4. 7:30 P.M., Code Amendment: R 6 District (Second Reading 4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed code amendment in the R6 District. This amendment would have no substantial effect on the code. It is mainly to rectify some outdated language. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. d. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. e. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 643 AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY USES IN THE RE, RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36 -82 is hereby amended as .follows (deletions are crossed out): Section 36 -82. Accessory uses. Prohibited uses. Any accessory use permitted in an R -1 Residence District (single dwelling) is permitted in the RE, residence estate district. Any prohibited use in the R -I district is prohibited in the RE district. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon is passage and publication. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 5. 7:40 P.M., Hazelwood Heights a. Rezoning (4 Votes) b. Variations c. Preliminary Plat 18 06 -12 -89 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., for rezoning property located on County Road C and Hazelwood from F, farm residence district, to R -1, single dwelling residence district; approval of a preliminary plat for 13 lots known as Hazelwood Heights; and two lot width variations. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the improvement. 4. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. 5. Sam Cave, representing Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 6. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. 7. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 8. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., has initiated a rezoning from F, farm residence district, to R -1, single - family dwelling residence district, for the following described property: The West 578 feet of the South 1,310 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, except the North 800 feet and except the West 264 feet of the South 330 feet. This property is also known as 1585 County Road C, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Ed Cave and Sons, Inc., pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on May 15, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 8, 1989, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 19 06 -12 -89 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 9. Mayor Greavu moved to the two lot width variations for Lots 2 and 13 Block 1 Hazelwood Heights on the basis that: 1. They would not adversely affect the plan or spirit of the subdivision regulations. 2. The street is located to meet the sideyard setback to the existing house. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 10. Mayor Greavu 1. Approval of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans by the City Engineer. 2. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. 3. Submit a signed developer's agreement with required surety for all required public improvements, the off -site storm sewer, erosion control and tree planting to the City Engineer. 4. The provision of drainage easements as may be required by the City Engineer. 5. Approval by the Director of Parks and Recreation of the off -site grading and location of the storm sewer to the pond. 6. Payment of a deferred sanitary sewer assessment of $1,284. 7. Change "Hazelwood Court" to "Germain Court ". 20 06 -12 -89 Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 11. Councilmember Juker moved to request staff to explain the difference between variations and variances. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. 7:50 P.M., Rezoning (4 Votes) and Preliminary Plat Beth Heights Addition a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Chad D. Lemmons for approval of a preliminary plat to create 52 single - dwelling lots and three outlots on the north side of Linwood Avenue. Outlot A would be a walkway access to Vista Hills park, Outlot B is the water tower site and Outlot C is proposed to be bought by the City of St. Paul as a buffer for the police department's shooting range to the east. Staff is recommending the rezoning from F, farm residence to R -1, single dwelling residential for compatibility with the Land Use Plan. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Chad Lemmons, the developer, spoke on behalf of the proposal. f. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following residents expressed their views: James Kayser, 2516 Linwood Avenue Adele Vordenbrugger, 2578 Linwood Dave Rydel, 2596 Linwood g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from F, farm residential to R -1 Single Dwelling for the following described property: The southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. This rezoning was initiated pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 21 06 -12 -89 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning commission on May 23,,- 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said rezoning be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 12, 1989 published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. i. Councilmember Anderson moved approval of the Beth Heiqhts Addition preliminary 1. Approval of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, and street plans by the City Engineer. 2. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain desirable mature trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. 3. Submit a signed developer's agreement with required surety for all required public improvements, dedication of necessary easements, erosion control, and tree planting to the City Engineer. 4. Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development before grading or construction begins, or final plat approval is given. This plan must illustrate the trees that are to be removed, 22 06- 12 -89` those that are to be retained, and those that are to be replanted. 5. Deed restrictions shall be filed on Lots 1 -5, Block 1, "prohibiting construction of any deck or addition attached to the dwelling, within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline, unless the building would be protected from the radiant heat of an explosion by burning or other physical barrier as required by code." 6. All present outbuildings associated with the existing dwelling shall be removed. The existing dwelling shall be removed or relocated to meet setback requirements on Lot 7, Block 2, or if this dwelling is to remain in its present location, the lots to the north shall be adjusted so a 31- foot rear -yard setback can be met from the proposed north lot line. 7. Dedication of Outlot A and Lot 1, Block 1 to the City for a parking lot for Vista Hills Park, in lieu of park availability charges. 8. The City awarding contracts for the Sterling Street improvement project or the developer constructing sanitary sewer to the existing sanitary sewer in Linwood Avenue. 9. Deeding Outlot B to the City. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. 8:00 P.M., Variances: 3M Center a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of 3M for approval of a variance for all of 3M Center to continue using parking spaces that measure 9 by 18 feet. The following variances are being requested: 1. One -foot parking stall width variance; 2. One -foot parking stall length variance when open parking stalls would abut a curb; 3. Two -foot parking stall length variance for parking ramp spaces (since there would be no bumper overhand). b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Bob Owens, Transportation Engineer for 3M Center, spoke on behalf of the request. e. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its 23 06 -12 -89 adoption: WHEREAS, 3M Company applied for a variance for the following described property: VAC STS ACCRUING & FOL: L I B 1 CARLTON PK LS 3 -12 ELLEN GROVE EX LS 1 &2 B 8 & EX PT SELY OF HWY OF LS 1,15 & 16 B5; ALL OF TANNERS LAKE OUTLOTS & EX S 290 FT OF E 168.84 FT OF W 188.84 FT; PT W OF CARLTON ST OF S 2/3 OF W 1/2 OF E 3/4 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 & EX N 785 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4; THE NW 1/4 & EX N 5 AC; THE W 1/8 OF NE 1/4 & EX NSP CO SUB STA & EX PT SLY OF HWY 94; THE SW 1/4 (SUBJ TO ESMTS & HWYS) IN SEC 36 TN 29 RN 22. This property is also known as 3M Center, Maplewood; WHEREAS, Section 36 -22 of the maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that parking spaces be at least ten feet wide by 20 feet deep, except that half of the total number of spaces may be nine feet wide; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing stalls that are 18 feet deep by nine feet wide, requiring a variance of one foot of stall width and two feet of stall depth; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was applied for on May 23, 1989. 2. This variance was reviewed by the Maplewood Community Design Review Board of May 23, 1989. The Board recommended to the City Council that said variance be approved. 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on June 12, 1989, to consider this variance. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described variance be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because 3M Center has been developed in a manner to fit future parking facilities within the established complex, based on Maplewood's previous parking code that did not specify a stall size minimum. The allocated parcels of land for future parking, therefore, would not accommodate stalls of the currently required size. The stall lengths and widths are limited by the existing building and street locations. 2. The variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance since the proposed parking facilities would be for the exclusive use of 3M Center. Any potential operational problems involving this facility would involve 3M and its employees without public involvement. 24 06 -12 -89 3. The ordinance permits nine - foot -wide stalls for "owner- occupied multiple dwellings ". Since 3M owns and occupies 3M Center, the nine - foot -wide stalls would, therefore, be consistent with the intent of the ordinance. 4. 3M's parking spaces would be consistent with the proposed parking ordinance. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Larry Bordson, 1733 Agate a. Mr. Bordson stated the land on Adolphus just north of Larpenteur that is used for ponding is being sold as tax forfeited lands. Is there a possibility that the City investigate acquiring the land. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize staff to contact Ramsey County regarding this orooerty. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. P. ADJOURNMENT OF JUNE 12, 1989 MEETING 9:53 P.M. City Clerk 25 06 -12 -89 MITWTE5 OF MAPLE1400D CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.H., Monday, October 9, 1989 and 4:30 P.M., Thursday, October 12, 1939 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 39 -22 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Miun_cipa- Building, and was called to order at 7:02 P.M., by Mayor Greavu. B. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmerber Present Gary W. Bastian, Council member Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF 14I1TUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting 130. 89 -9 (Apr ,-.l_ 6 and 10, 1989) Councilmember Anderson moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 89 -9 Apra -1 6 and 10, 1989) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes of Meeting No. 89 -10 (April 10 and 24, 1989) Councilmember Bastian moved that the M" nutes of Meet;.ne No. 89 -10 (Apr 20 and 24. 1939) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 3. Minutes of Council /Manager Workshop (August 13, 1989) Councilmember Anderson moved Workshop (August 18. 1989) a Seconded by Mayor Greavu. the Minutes of Council /Manager Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmember Anderson, Juker and Rossbach Councilmember Bastian abstained. 1 10 -9 -39 APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Gall Street 2. Brush Burning 3. Allen Anderson - Water Problems 4. Larpenteur Avenue - Width 5. Inflatable Domes 6. Fire Department Study 7. State Research Lab 8. Convenience Stores - Fuel Pumps 9. County Road B, Between Cub Foods and Dental Building 10. Item E -7 be -removed. 11. Recreational Vehicles Seconded by Counc.'.'_member Bastian. Ayes - all E -A APPOINTMENTS 1. Planning Commission Appointments a. P €anager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Gary Gerke, candidate for position on Planning Commission, answered questions from the Council. c. Will Rossbach, 1386 E. County Road C, a candidate spoke on behalf of being appointed to the Planning Commission. d. Councilmember Anderson moved to and Wiliam Rossbach, 1356 E. Count Seconded by Councilmember Bastian E. CONSENT AGENDA n as Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmen:bers Anderson, Bastian. and JuLer. Councilmember Rossbach abstained. Council removed E -11 from the Consent Agenda to become I -S. Councilmember Anderson mov 1. Approval of Claims Approved the Claims as follows: all, to 0 as rec 2 10 -9 -89 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 541,588.17 Checks X14827 - #4895 Dated 09 -14 -89 thru 09 -29 -89 178,610.95 Checks #2177 - #2271 Dated 10 -09 -89 720,169.12 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL; 169,675.28 Payroll Checks 33,011.63 Payroll Deductions 202,686.91 Total Payroll 922,856.03 GRAND TOTAL 2. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 2691 White Bear Avenue (Maplewood Covenant Church). Approved a renewal of the conditional use permit for an outpatient adolescent chemical dependency center at 2691 White Bear Avenue for five - years subject to the original conditions of approval. 3. Conditional Use Permit Termination: 2239 Hillwood Avenue (Smith) Approved the termination of the conditional use permit for a cleaning business home occupation at 2239 Hazelwood Street, since the applicants sold their business and will no longer be conducting this business at that location. 4. Time ..tension: Miggler Addition Preliminary Plat Approval of a one -year time extension for the Miggler Addition preliminary plat subject to the September 26, 1988, conditions of approval. 5. Budget Transfer: Public Works Approved a transfer of $5,196.25 from the general fund contingency to Public Works Administration Account 101 -501 -5630 to cover the unbudgeted costs of computer hardware and software of which $4,779.00 will be reimbursed later by the state aid office. 6. Donation to Nature Center Accepted the donation of $50.00 from the Maplewood Oakdale Lions Club for the purpose of purchasing candy for the Maplewood Nature Center's Halloween haunt Program (101- 604 -4120) on Monday, October 30, 1989. 3 10 -9 -89 Removed from Agenda. 8. Certification of Election Judges Resolution No. 89 - 10 - 160 RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of Election Judges for the 1989 General Election, Tuesday, IOVember 7, 1989: Precinct No. 1 Precinct No. 8 Karl Biebighauser, Chairman Irene Ling Claire Heap* Kathy Be-rqual Precinct No. 2 Pat Thompson, Chairman Kathleen Ditte'_ Florence Stella Helen Dickson Precinct No. 3 Charlene Arbuckle, Chairman Doris Broady Alice Miller Richard Wolszon Precinct No. 4 Caroline Warner, Chairman Betty Eddy Joyce Lipinski LeAnn Kaup Precinct No. 5 Elsie Wiegert, Chairman Emma K1ebe Phyllis Erickson Annette LaCasse 4 Betty Berglund, Chairman Phyllis Lofgren Rita Frederickson Nancy Behr Precinct No. 9 Bernadine Mortinson, Chairman Delores Schipp Margaret McDonald Ruth Myckieby -Lang Precinct No. 10 Pat Werden', Chairman Mary Lou Lieder Diane Golaski Anne Fosburgh Precinct h?o. 11 Shirley Luttrell, Chairman Maxine Olson Delores Lofgren Helen King Precinct No. 12 Mary Libhardt, Chairman.. Deloris Fastner Mildred Dehen Marcella Watson 10 -9 -89 Precinct No. 6 Kathy Supan, Chairman Gunborg Mowchan Linda Pr-igge Judy Widholm Sandy Jones Precinct No. 7 Margaret Wolszon, Chairman Armella Podgorski Joan Cottrell Mildred Burke Betty Haas 9. Budget Transfer - "Maplewood In Motion" Precinct No. 13 Jack Arbuckle, Chairman Donald Wiegert Bill Schnellman Richard Lofgren Precinct No. 14 Marilyn Wold, Chairman Grace Locke Elsie Anderson Margaret Earley Approved a budget transfer of $1,550 from the Contingency Account to fund a sixth and final issue of "Maplewood In Motion" for November and December. 10. Cancel Budget Hearing Cancelled the budget hearings that were established. 11. Certification of Delinquent Sewer Accounts Discussed under Item I -8. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M., Upper Afton Road, Project 56 -07 (4 Votes) a. 15ayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing to consider the improvement of Upper Afton Road, fi.om McKnight Road to Century Avenue. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. C. City Attorney Patrick Kelly explained the proceedings of the public hearing. d. Assistant City Engineer Irish presented the specifics of the proposed improvements. e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following area residents e:_pressed their opinions: Emil Wi.twicke, 92 Dennis Lane Ray Schriber, 16 Ferndale Ed Vitek, 2507 Upper Afton Road 5 10 -9 -89 James Sullivan, 2647 Upper Afton Road Pauline Howland, 2663 Upper After Road Rita Brenner, 2673 Upper Afton Road Mr. Janisch, 2673 Upper Afton Road Ralph Nordstrom Vern Tischler, 2689 Upper Afton Road Tony Bekavac, 48 Mayhill Road Dean Larson, 77 Farrell St., presented a petition requesting -resurfacing of side streets f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 - to - 161 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, water main, and appurtenances on Upper Afton Road from McKnight Road to Century Avenue, City Project 86 -07, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice dully given was duly held on I°tonday, October 9, 1989, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NO ?d, THEREFORE, BE IT P,ESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF *L4PLE4700D, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, water mein, and appurtenances on Upper Afton Road from McI: night Road to Century Avenue, City Project 86 -07, as described in the notice of eharing thereof, and orders the same to be made. 2. The City Engineer is des:i_gnated Engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and speci.fications for the making of said improvement. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. h. Councilmember Anderson moved to instruct Staff to contact Ramse County regarding parking lots on their property; flashing liPhts at Crosswall.s and further instructed Staff to investigate the possibility of an overlay project for the streets in the area. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - &'.l. 2. 8:00 P.P -i., P-celimi_nary Plat: Seasons Park 6 10 -9 -89 a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Sherman Boosalis interests, Inc., for approval of a preliminary plat for 20 single family lots known as Seasons Parr: Addition to Maplewood. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Director of Public Works Haider answered questions regarding the drainage system. e. Director of Community Development Olson presented the Planning Commission report. f. Mario Cocchiarella, representing the developer, Sherman Boosalis Interests, Inc., spoke on behalf of the proposal. g. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Joseph Zappa, 2522 Flandrau, stated the easement for right of way signed by the City and the Oswalds was not legal. John Oswald and Karen Oswald empressed the same opinion as Mr..Zappa. Mr. John Kavanaugh, owner of Lot B on the proposal. Mr. Bill Burns h. Counc_lmember Rossbach moved to continue this hearing for two :peeks October 23, 1989) in order to obtain more data. Seconded by Counc_lmeniner Bast -an. Ayes - alt. 3. 3:15 P.M., Conditional Use Permit Revision: Linwood Heights a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public bearing regarding the request of Sue Clemens (Edina Realty) that the conditional use permit for the project be revised to allow the conversion of 23 one bedroom units to two bedroom units. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. C. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal and presented the Planning Commission report. d. Bill McCrumb, Architect and builder for the project owned by Metfopolitan Federal Bank, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 7 10 -9 -89 e. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolutions and moved its adoption: 89 - 10 - 162 WHEREAS, the metropolitan Federal Bank has initiated a conditional use permit to revise the Linwood Heights PUD in Maplewood, Minnesota, described as follow: All of the lots in the Linwood Heights and Adrienne's Addition plats. WHEREAS. the procedural history of the CUP is as follows: 1. This CUP was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commissi.on on Septenber 18, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council. that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 9, 1939. Not_ce thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning. Commission. PLOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE 14APLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described cond- 7tional use permit is approved to a'_low a change in the linwood heights PUD unit mix from 62 one - bedroom and 22 two- bedroon units to 34 one- bedrootn and 50 two- bedroom urcts on the basis of the folloe: ins f- ndings of fact: 1. Revisions to the PUD are in conformity with the intent of the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. If the maximum allowable density established by the comprehensive plan is exceeded at all, it should not warrant a change in public land use policy. 2. The revisions to the PUD will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The Linwood Heights Townhomes will remain compatible with the character of the zoning district and the area. There SJ, -ill. be no changes to the existing site plan or the exterior of townhomes. 8 10 -9 -89 i 4. The use will not depreccate property values. Tile CUP approval will encourage completion of the project and sale of the remaining townhomes. '.. 5. The PUD revisions use will not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential land uses due to noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The small increase in the number of people due to the bedroom conversions will generate only minimal increases in vehicular traffic on local streets and will not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that w4li .. cause undue burden to the area properties. In the worst case scena:.o, the increase in people density will generate cnly 3.3 additional trips dur:'_ng the p.m. peak hour. Incomplete off- street parking areas will be required to be completed. 7. The PUD is already served with all essential public services. 3. The use will. not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for pub L_c facilities and services; and c:,i J -i not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The PUD w-ll continue to preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features. There t.il- be no change in the site plan or exterior design of townhomes. 10. The use will cause no adverse env_ronmental effects. Approval is subject to comp-et-on of the off- street parking and andscap:i.ng imp ;.overients in acco_ dance w:th the originally app ='oved PUD plan, dated June 17, 1981 as amended, and the July 14, 1981 landscape plan. by December 31, 1989. A deviation from the maximum allowed density is approved, oil the basic, that: 1. Certain regulations contained in th`_s chapter should not apply to the proposed development because of its unique nature. 2. The PUD would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 9 10 -9 -89 3. The planned unit development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. 4. The deviations would not constitute a significant threat to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of nearby land. 5. The deviations are required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are not required solely, for financial reasons. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 4. 5:45 P.M., 1244 Kohlman Avenue (Durand) a. Rezoning (4 Votes) b. Conditional Use Permit 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Lawrence and Sandra Durand to rezone 1244 Kohlman Avenue from R -1, Single Family Residential to M -1, Light Manufacturing for a conditiona- use permit to allow the rezoned parcel to be used for tree storage. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Commun_.ty Development Oison presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. The applicant, Larry Durand, spoke on behalf of his proposal. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposa_. The following voiced their opinions: John Buesing, 1247 Kohlman Avenue Sandra Durand, 2964 Chippewa (one of the applicants) Robert Emerson, 1257 Pohlman Avenue Bruce Mogren, representing Edith Peltier, 1250 Kohlman 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Bastian moved that property along Kohlman remain residential. Motion died for lack of a second. S. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the rezoni.ng subject to the front portion of property be R -1 and back portion, after a survey, be Rezoned 14-1, Light Manufacturing, and a'-so approved the conditional 10 10 -9 -89 use permit. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Motion failed. Ayes - Mayor Greavu and Councilmember Bastian. Nays - Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach. 9. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 - 10 - 163 WHEREAS, Lawrence and Sandra Durand initiated a rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Residential to M -1, Light Manufacturing for the following- described property: Lot 6 of Koh ?.man's Lakeview Addition This property is also known as 1244 Kohiman Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as fo1lows: 1. This rezoning was initiated by Lawrence and Sandra Durand pursuant to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances. 2. T:-.<s rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 12, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that Lot 6, except the northerly 15,000 square feet, be rezoned to I1 -1. 3. The Maplewood C-* -ty Council held a public hearing on October 9, 1987 to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that all of Lot 6 of Kohlman's Lakeview Addition, except the northerly 15,000 square feet, be rezoned to F, Farm residence on the basis of the following find: -rgs of fact: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, 11 10 -9 -89 ii i purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the characte_ of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, effi- cient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Counci.lmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. 9:00 P.M., Woodlynn Heights a. Preliminary Plat b. Final Plat 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mack Nettleton for preliminary and final plat approval to create four townhouse lots and an outlot. 2. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specif4cs of the proposal. 4. ISack Nettleton, the developer, spoke on behalf of his request. He expressed his concerns for the necessity of sidewalks. 5. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following expressed their views: Charlotte Brooker, 2172 Woodlynn Dale Jansen, 2227 Woodlynn, President of the Woodlynn Townhouse Association 6. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 7. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the preliminary plat for Woodlynn Heights 12 10 -9 -59 Tovnhomes No. 4 subject to the following condition: 1. Resolution of the grading and drainage concerns on the property in question to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Councilmember Bastian moved to include sidewalks in the motion. Motion died for lack of a second. Voting on original motion. S. Mayor Greavu move Heights Townhomes No. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker and Rossbach. tday - Councilmember Bastian. prove the f.nal plat of ect to the conditions of preliminary plat being completed. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. 9:15 P.M., Street Vacation - Netnorlin Court (4 Votes) a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Mack Nettleton to vacate the right of way fo_- Netnorlin Court south of Woodlynn and west of Mciinight Road. b. Manager•mcGui_re presented the Staff report. C. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal and also presented the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following erpressed their opinions: Chuck Rega "i, 2206 Woodlynn Mack Nettleton, the applicant Ike Rutherford, 2048 Netnorlin Court Joe Peterson, 2223 Lydia Charlotte Brooker, 2172 Woodlynn e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Anderson moved to table this Item for further information until the next meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. I' 'o- Greavu moved to wa_.ve the Rules of Procedures and e--tend the meeting past the 13 10 -9 -89 Aline. Seconded by Counciinember Anderson. Ayes - all. 7. 9:30 P.M., Tay Increment Financing a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding Modification of development program for Development District No. 1 and Modification of Tar Increment Financing plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District 1.10. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 of the City of Maplewood. b. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. C. Mary Ippe_, Bond.ng Consultant, Briggs and Morgan, presented the s>pecifi.cs of the proposal. d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adopt-on: 89 - 10 - 164 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRA14 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, AND APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 -2. HOUSINC DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPME14T DISTRICT NO. 1 -3 WWITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 110. 1 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Map- ecaood, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows. Section 1. Recitals 1.01. It has been proposed that the City adopt a modified Development Program with respect to Development District No. 1, and modify the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing district No. 1 -3 and Economic development District No. 1 -3, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended. 1.02. The Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared a modified Development Program for Development District No. 1, and has caused to be prepa ed mod- fications to the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development 14 10 -9 -89 District No. 1 -3, defining more precisely the increased project costs to be included in Development District No. 1 and describing the action to be undertaken by the City to aid the development of Development District No. 1. 1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption of the modified Development Program relating to Development District No. 1, and the modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3,. including, but not limited to, notification of Ramsey County and Independent School District No. 622 and Special Intermediate School District No. 916 and the holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law. Section 2. DiistrictNo. 1 Economic Devol Modi.ficat'. District No. District No. velopment Program for Development n of Tar. Increment Financing Plans for 1 -2. Housinv District No. 1 -3 and 2.01. The Council hereby adopts the modified Development Program for Development District No. 1 and the modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3. The City is not modifying the boundaries of Development D=istrict Pio. 1 nor the boundaries of Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3. Section 3. Findings for the Modification of the Tan Inc inancing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2 H istrict No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. "1 -3. 3.01. Economic Development District No. 1 -2 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 when established were established as economic development districts within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12. The City reaffirms the findings previously made with respect to the establishment of Economic Development District No. 1 -2 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3. 3.02. Housing District No. 1 -3, when established, was established as a housing district within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 11. The City reaffirms the findings previously made with respect to the establishment of Housing District No. 1 -3 and the findings previously made with respect to the establishment of Housing District No. 1 -3. 3.03. The Council finds that the proposed development, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. The specific basis for such finding being: Private investment will not finance the development activities set 15 10 -9 -59 out in the Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Deve - opment District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1- 3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tar, increment financing so that other development will occur within Development District No. 1. 3.04. The Council further finds that the modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole. The specific basis for such finding being: i) Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 are properly zoned; ii) The Tax Increment Financing Plans will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. 3.05. The Council further finds that the modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District Ido. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of Development District No. 1 by private enterprise. The specific basis for such finding being: The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within Development District no. 1. Section 4. Approval of the Modified Development Program and the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans. 4.01. The mod-Cfi.ed Development Program for Development Distr -_ct No. 1, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Cier1:, and the modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Economic Development District No. 1 -2, Housing District No. 1 -3 and Economic Development District No. 1 -3 are hereby approved and adopted. 4.02. The Staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. G AWARD OF BIDS 16 10 -9 -89 None Mayor Greavu adjourned the October 9, 1989 Meeting at 11:00 P.M. Mayor Greavu reconvened the meeting at 4:35 P.M., Thursday, October 12, 1989. ROLL CALL John C. Greavu, Mayor Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Absent H. UITINISHLD BUSINESS 1. Review Assessment Appeals: Water Distr- -ct 8 - Project 86 -15 a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented each request for an assessment appeal. c. Mayor Greavu moved to approve Staff's recommendation on the assessment appeals for Project 36 -15. Seconded by Councilmember Juke::. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker May - Councilmember Bastian. d. Councilmember Bastian moved defe-ment of the assessments where there o no water available. Motion d:'-ed for ?ack of a second. I. NEEW BUSINESS 1. Community Design Review Board Appeal: 2714 Highwood Avenue (Carver) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table for two weeks and instructed Staff to notify the neighbors of the appeal. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Juker. Nay - Mayor Greavu 2. Schedule Public Hearing: County Road B at Rice Street, Project 89 -05 17 10 -9 -ga a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 -10 -165 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of County Road B - -Rice to 1200 feet east, City Project 89 -05, by construction of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described; I?04i, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MI'_iITESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of tine C-_ty Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on County Road B- -Rice to 1200 feet east, City Project 89 -05, by construction of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby recei ved. 2. The Counc_.i will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all o -_- a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,917,300. 3. A publ_c hearing will be held -n the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 13th day of November, 1989, at 8:15 P.M. to cons -der. said improvement. The City Cierl: shall g've marled and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - a'_1. 3. Approve Plans: Workhouse Sanitary Sewer, Project 89 -09 a. Manager mcGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 - 10 - 166 18 10 -9 -89 WHEREAS, pursuant to allocation of funds in the 1989 budget, plans and specifications for workhouse sanitary sewer, Project 89 -03, have been prepared by the City Ergineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOS?, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of wh;ch are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bullet4n an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened at the City Hail and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bcd bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hex -eby autho"_-ized and inst-_ucted to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place specified, and to tabulate the b -_ds received. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 4. Proclamation on Supporting Red _ Ribbon Campaign a. Manager McGui -re presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved the adoption of the following proclamation: WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse in this nation has reached epidemic stages, and the 15- to 24- year -old age group is dying at a faster rate than any other age group; and WHEREAS, it is imperative that visible, unified prevention education efforts by community members be launched to reduce the demand for drugs; and WHEREAS, the Partnership and the National Federation of Parents for D,:ug- Free Youth are sponsoring the National Red Ribbon Campaign offering citizens the opportunity to demonstrate their commitment to drug-free lifestyles; and 19 10 -9 - -09 67 5 WHEREAS, this annual Red Ribbon Campaign wil: be celebrated in every community 9.n America during Red Ribbon Week, October 22-29., 1989; and WHEREAS, President George Bush and Mrs. Barbara Bush are the National Honorary Chairmen and Governor and Mrs. Rudy Perpich are the State Honorary Chairmen to provide this community focus on a drug -free America; and WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious, institutions, service organizations, youth, physicians, senior citizens, military sports teams, and individuals will demonstrate their comni.tment to drug -free, healthy lifestyles by wearing and displaying red ribbons during this week-long campaign; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, further commits its resources to ensure the success of the Red Ribbon Campaign; MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Maplewood does hereby support October 22 -29, 1989, as Red Ribbon Week and encourages its citizens to partic_ pate in drug prevention education activities, making a visible statement that we are strongly committed to a drug -free community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood encourages all of its citizens to pledge: "My choice—drug free." Seconded by Counc=.imember Anderson. Authorization to Hire C.S.O. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. Ayes - all. b. Mayor Greavu moved approval to hire a permanent fu17. -t;_me Community Service Officer as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Project Budget Adjustments Ayes - all. a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to discuss Project 83 -07 separately. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.. c. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the following project budget adjustments: Project 87 -20, Ferndale Street Storm Sewer 20 10 -9 -89 Budget Adjustment of $7,000 be established to cover the final engineering costs of the project. Project 87 -32 Budget adjustment of $4,000 be established to cover remaining feasibility study and public hearing costs. Project 84 -14, Walter Street Budget adjustment of $17,500 be established to cover 1989 engineering expenditures and final payment to RoSo Contracting. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson and Juker. Play - Councilmenber Bastian. d. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the budget adjustment for Project 83-07, Beaver Creek Storm Sewer, in the amount of $3,000 to cover anticipated ieeal fees. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 7. Waiver of Moratorium a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Greavu moved to waive the moratorium on preliminary plat apps--'cations for Cave's Century 5th Addition as the grad9ng is completed, util'_ 'I.ties have been installed and there were no t=ees. Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 8. Certificat__on of Delinquent Sewer Accounts a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved i_ts adoption: 89 - to - 167 RESOLVED that the City Clark is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached list of delinquent sewer rental charges and hydrant charges, said list made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1989, collectible in 1990, and which listing includes interest at the rate of e_ght (8) percent on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $92,588.80 21 10 -9 -89 Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 9. Property Acqus'_tion, Lot 21, Block 1, Netnorlin Addition a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Anderson moved acq Addition, at a purchase price estima uisitiion of Lot 21, Block 1, Netnorlin at 56.750.00. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 - 10 - 168 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County has classified ac non - conservation land, certain land lying With".n the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, a copy of the classification resolution together With a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 20 "2.01, sub. 1; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has determined that said land is required for drainage purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said classification of the land . shown on said list as non- conservation land is hereby approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper City officials be and hereby are authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax forfeited and for drainage purposes; and BR IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance of said tax forfeited Land in the office of the Land Commissioner. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember- Anderson moved to reconsider previous Council action and requ -re a cash escrow for Woodlynn Heights No. 4 Addition. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 10. Environmental Protection Meeting a. Manager McGu_.re stated that Director of Community Development Olson 22 10 -9 -59 had met with area developers and would be presenting an ordinance to Council. 11. Resolution: Glacier Assessments a. City Attorney Kelly stated a settlement regarding Glacier Corporation for the Frost Avenue Project 83 -01 assessments, had been reached. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 89 - 10 - 169 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 85 -1 -3 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, adopted January 14, 1985, the special assessments for the construction of Frost Avenue Project 83 -01 were levied agai.nE;t property described by County Aud_'.tor's Code No. 16 29 22 41 0031; WHEREAS, $52,028.35 of the aforesaid assessment was judged to not benefit the property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MIiNESOTA, that the assessment for Frost Avenue Project 88 -01 against the property described by County Auditor's Code No. 16 29 22 41 0031 be correctly certified to the Auditor o Ramsey County by deleting therefrom the amount of $52,028.35. Total amount to be assessed is $120,000.00. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Gall Street a. Councilmember Bastian stated he had received a call from a resident regarding water drainage on his property from another property. b. Staff stated they were aware of the problem. 11. Recreation. Vehicles a. Councilmember Bastian questioned if there is an ordinance in the future regarding the storing of recreational vehicles in front yards. b. Staff- stated it will be on the neat agenda. 2. Brush Burning 23 10 -9 -89 a. Councilmember Anderson stated residents are requesting brush burning permits. b. Staff stated such a permit is illegal. Only permits for recreational fires are allowed. 3. Alien Anderson - Water Problem a. Councilmembe_- Anderson stated that Allen Anderson, 1410 Cope Avenue, had a water stub in removed when the street was constructed. b. Councilmember Anderson moved to waive the Rules of Procedure to tale action on Mr. Anderson's water problem.- Seconded by Mayor Greavu. c. Councilmember Anderson moved that the Ci the cost of the water stub in replacement. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. 4. Larpenteur Avenue Width Ayes - all. reimburse Mr. Anderson for Ayes - all. a. Councilmember Anderson stated that along Larpenteur Avenue there are different widths. If the County constructs a 52 foot width west of Edgerton, when will east of Edgerton be widened? b. Staff stated probably not for quite a while. 5. Inflatable Dome No discussion. 6. Fire Department Study No discussion. 7. State Research Lab Bu__lding a. Councilmember Juker stated when the State received approval for their building there was supposed to be a right -turn lane on the4.r own property. Mow, she stated, they are going through residential property and have constructed curbs, etc. b. Staff stated that was only for emergency use and be chained off. Staff will investigate. 3. Convenience Stores - Fuel Pumps 24 10 -9 -39 i a. Councilmember Juker stated her concerns regarding the amount of convenience stores with fuel pumps. She questioned if something could be done to : -imit the development of such businesses. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to refer this to Staff for the feasib_ lit of a total moratorium on future Uas stations and remove such permitted use from the ende hnnk- Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all. 9. Property on County Road B between Cub and the Dental Lab a. Councilmember Juker stated that there looks like a lot of digging has taken place on County Road B east of Cub Foods and does not look good. b. Staff is aware of the problem and will investigate further. C. Councilmember Anderson stated his concerns about developers changing the character of the land and never returning it to the original- condition if development is not completed. 10. Remove Item E -7 E -7 removed from Consent Agenda. il. Recreational Vehicles Discussed after Item K -1 L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None. M. ADJOUR MT? 1.l'_' CF OCTOBER 12, 19 ^09 MEE' IIG 6:28 P.M. City Ci 25 10 -9 -89 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 4, 1989 CONFERENCE ROOM A The meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. b 'Ma or Greavu. Present were. y y Mayor Greavu Councilmembers Anderson, and Rossbach City Manager McGuire St. Paul Pioneer Press Representatives: Nancy Connor Ann Baker The purpose of the meeting o discussgwasus media coverage and circulation withtherepresentativesoftheSt. Paul Pioneer Press. There was general discussion regarding the confusion that results from have ngMaplewoodnewsappearinthreedifferentcommunitysectionsof ' and how to the Pioneer Press, improve the coverage of Maplewood news. It was decided that. the reporter would contactact the City Manager and variousdepartmentheadsonaregularbasistofindoutwhatwas ' going on in the CityandthattheCityofficialss-hould feel free to contact the reporter with anynews. The meeting was- adjourned at 5:15 p.m. AGENDA-REPORT Agenda Number E -1 Action by Council:1 Endorsed.. Modified . Reiected__ TO: City Manager. FROM Finance Director ` RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: October 16, 1989 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following. claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 309,862.70 Checks #4896 - #4935 Dated 10 -02 -89 thru 10 -11 -89 121,399.69 Checks #2281 - #2418 Dated 10 -23 -89 431,262.39 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL. 171,040.56 Payroll Checks 33,616.86 Payroll Deductions 204,657.42 Total Payroll 635,919.81 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. DFF: kaz V aUCHREG C I -Y OF MAPL.EWOOD PAGE 1 I 10/ 1Z /89 14:3: VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 10 VOUCHER/ C -H E-C K-- _.--- __-- V -E N U R_ C H : K E N D u R I T E M ITEM G H E C: K NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT FICA PAYABLE 7 ,• 2 7 .5-= FED INC TAX PAY 20,195.25 FICA CUNSiRIL-; 7,ZZ7.5.6 34,650.37 4897 560100 10/02/89 MN STATE COMMISSIONER ST INC TAX PAY 71999-07 71999 .07 a; 4 3 5..__.._,...... 4.3. D l .0 -/ u Z 15.9 -- _ WISCONSIN DEPT 's- OF' REVENUE - . ST INC TAX PAY 1 c& A . 9 6 1.696946 Ii - 4599 90OZ75 10/0Z/89 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY DED PAY 6 *31.50 _ 631.50 4` 00 541400 101/0Z/89 MI NN . STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LIC FEES 169839.55 16,839.55 s MINN'"' STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 791.00 ... 791 r00..... 4902 550350 10/02/89 SUBURBAN UTILITIES TRAVEL TRAIN 40.00 40.00 4903 460300 10/02/89 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI-1'IES WORK COMP INS 31,123.Z5 311 1Z3.Z5 4 9'04'---- D3D4C3D 10>/03/89 ANDERS0N CAR0LE PROGRAM SUPPLIES w..._ 1 SUPPLIES JANI'{"OR 3a; SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES EQUIP 10.07 40.54 i:,8 4905 541400 10/03/59 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST' DRIV LIC FEES 57'3,50 573.50 4906 r._.- 541400 10/03/89 MINN.. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LIC S=EES 131,003.07 141 i.i Jl 49 7^ 4 Y Utz r ro 4-r MT NiV . ,TA TE TR EA UR ER S T D R-1 V L I C FEES 4903, 541400 10 /04 /89 MILAN. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LTC FEES 91259.21 4909 510100 10/04/89 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN. FEES FOR SERVICE 3, X551 00 31355.00 U T_I L -- 9 8 . , _ UTIL 1677 E.DGE.RTON 85.02 UTIL 1200 STERLING 3.90 UTIL Z100 LARPENT 84.6 UTIL 1530 CORDD 31599.:4 41162.66 IJy 4 i i 140440 i0I0 lS .-_..__._.C;LER.K...- C E'.__D_I.STR_ICT -COURT CNTY---- DRI -V -- LIC- .FEE ._..._.... l3s' 00_. l tf! 4...911 . 2 290330 10 01/59 FRET GHT HOUSE FEES FOR SERVICE r S 4 C Z 2 , 4 bill16 4913 751350 10/05/89 RI VERTOWN TROLLEY FEES FOR SERVICE 140,00 140.00 NN . .ST A. TE MTR VEH . _ LI C ._ . FEES 10, t f i 491-95 541400 10/05/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 453.50 453.50 4' 1c 190400 10/06/89 DEFT a OF NATURA L RESOURSES DN R LTC FEES. 59 000 59.00 iu 41 w ...._..___._ . 45024 5816513 10/09/89 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM ISSN SEWAGE TREATMENT* 112,439.14 111,8, 4 r14 P.ONER. .... _ _ .UTIL ..1 8 ;R,D ...._.._,._...._.:..: _ _..... r •~ ..._.. ....._.. W._....._:.._..w_. :_w._ __._..-_ UTIL 1830 CORDB 6,615.68 UTIL 1248 BEAM 11 _ x.74 U T L.L i 8 .-_ IOW -.. 8 6 . _.-- . Y_..- .- _ a %. r - 05 UTIL 1698 PKWY 39.65 UTIL 1751 ARCADE 109r73 VOUCHREG lo/IZ/89 14:3 12E LTTTL i6 40 1/Z L:U ' CITY .OF MAPL.EWOOD VOUCHER/ C 1EC cEGTSTEI WAGE 1 1 i39 VOUCHER/ UTIL. 1 ?F 0 ADOLPHUS r 40 18 2 5 A D O LP H t . ti..__ -._ . 41V1 5j NUMBER VENDCR- a,l VEND- UTIL 1945 PROSPER 19 ITEM CHECK 3 5 7T I L_ . 4 _N S 1P.A Ut x... NUMBER DATE NA ME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 y2 r G • 7 r !1 r fir t'}wg^ Apo _ .... .,...r,.........,._...... 1" „ V ate. G 1' 1 Lr 6.._:,.. w. ,.....,_ ... ..,.,.................." " . m . ...•.....,..,,..,........«,,....:. ..,. ,...a..,..- .,- .,...,.,„.,, 1 r 47 UTIL 618 FARRELL r3 4R UTIL 2019 BEAM 115 R?' G i, r` g 10 9, 4918S 720600 10/0618* 9 POSTMASTEk POSTAGE -SEWER BILL G , V V 0 r 0pp V r10 4919 541400 10/06/89 MI NN w STATE TREASURER MTR VEH L.IC FEES 79328600 70328600 12 13 14 lei T 0 15 I t g i i:,0-0 17 4921 941050 10/09/89 WEST ST, PAUL O F TRAVELI TRAIN r 16 19 srl TRAVEL :.. TRA1N 15. ... 20 21 TRAVEL. TRAIN 37,50 22 t TRAVEL TRAIN 3T.50 23 7 g 57 24 TRAVEL TRAIN 18 r75 1 rani 25 26 2,i 27 22 1V7S4 TO ORTNERN STATES -PION R UT It" E s I;3r 1695 BEELE 21 •8-6 2z9 30 74 UTIL 95 LARD'S 92 31 Ly L L r 32 332d r UTIL . T4 1 LA R D 248.. 34 UTIL 10 8 0 CORDC, r i291 U T 11_ 14 0 E R V A 36 UTIL 1882 ESHURE 55.37 3$ UTIL 1985 A R C A U E r227 7 39 131 40 41WUTIL2250MCMENEMYD.B 42 U T L L 7 4 i E L L E R i y t 43 i3, 35 UTIL .1 0=S LKEU 0` 44 45 f, , 4923 661754 10/09/89 NORTHER N STATE POWER UTIL 68 STERLING 46 47 w ...._..___._ . 45024 5816513 10/09/89 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM ISSN SEWAGE TREATMENT* 112,439.14 111,8, 4 r14 P.ONER. .... _ _ .UTIL ..1 8 ;R,D ...._.._,._...._.:..: _ _..... r •~ ..._.. ....._.. W._....._:.._..w_. :_w._ __._..-_ UTIL 1830 CORDB 6,615.68 UTIL 1248 BEAM 11 _ x.74 U T L.L i 8 .-_ IOW -.. 8 6 . _.-- . Y_..- .- _ a %. r - 05 UTIL 1698 PKWY 39.65 UTIL 1751 ARCADE 109r73 LTTTL i6 40 1/Z L:U ' t 812 `Y UTIL 1662 DEMONT 5, r T i39 UTIL. 1 ?F 0 ADOLPHUS r 40 18 2 5 A D O LP H t . ti..__ -._ . 41V1 UTIL 1845 PROSPER X41.6,03a,l UTIL 1945 PROSPER 19 20.60 Ail- 1' 7T I L_ . 4 _N S 1P.A Ut x... r I UTIL 2001 BRADLEY 37,45514rUTILD}5 EDGFRTC y2i_ I UTIL .1 ., , A T`L A NT i C _ w r 47 UTIL 618 FARRELL 6.60. 4R UTIL 2019 BEAM 115 R?' w ...._..___._ . 45024 5816513 10/09/89 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM ISSN SEWAGE TREATMENT* 112,439.14 111,8, 4 r14 P.ONER. .... _ _ .UTIL ..1 8 ;R,D ...._.._,._...._.:..: _ _..... r •~ ..._.. ....._.. W._....._:.._..w_. :_w._ __._..-_ UTIL 1830 CORDB 6,615.68 UTIL 1248 BEAM 11 _ x.74 U T L.L i 8 .-_ IOW -.. 8 6 . _.-- . Y_..- .- _ a %. r - 05 UTIL 1698 PKWY 39.65 UTIL 1751 ARCADE 109r73 VOUCHREU CITY OF MAPLEWOOD FADE 3 10/12/89 14.32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER }a FOR PERIOD 10 VOUCHER/ 'I i T E h1 _ 17` k MCHECK 51. NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 4.928 4929 4.931 541400 10/10/39 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 633.00 638.00 MTR VEH LIC FEES 1 4932 661750 10/11/89 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTIL. 1540 C4RDC I U T I L 15 3 L A R P S ... s y UTI L Z 17 ROSEL.AWN UTIL 2258 CONWAY 107.83 UTIL 707 SKILLMAN 2.75 1,f) UTIL 2925 WHBE:AR U T. I .. •` S 1t H L..A R . __._... 157.13 151. U_TTL -2`6 1"L I N W C 1D.. FEES FOR S UTIL 2255 RIPLEY UTIL 29+9+1 WH %EAR 156.19 81223.83 1j 4 fsl 0T5 `,_.. 1DI10/ NATI i iA1, INSTITUTE t hl TRAVEL TRAM! 0 C 5 5.04 4,1 4 21 41,1 541400 10/10/89 MINN. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LIC FEES 5, 445. Sys 4 5 . #S MAIN" MATERIAL 774.11 5 541400 10/10/59 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC S=EES 504.50 504.50 i 541400 10I14/ MINK. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LIC FEES 5,59 7,0 _ 5_,.5.97 -.55 0 3 a. CA I4.931 541400 10/10/39 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 633.00 638.00 MTR VEH LIC FEES 1 4932 661750 10/11/89 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTIL. 1540 C4RDC 2.75 UTIL 220 ODAY 2.75 s'' 1 UTI L Z 17 ROSEL.AWN UTIL 707 SKILLMAN 2.75 UTIL 2501 LONDON 2251 001oz04 1 U_TTL -2`6 1"L I N W C 1D.. FEES FOR S UTIL 2255 RIPLEY w 2.75 s 311UTIL19+02 CORDB 96.81 117.21 13 4933 630755 10/11/89 NATIONAL INSTITUTE: ON T7 `_MTNN -: _'S_TA TRAVEL TRAIN CT__FE.E.E ,._, .._ _ - -_ti .. , « _w_..,_ 1:,; 95,00 r .... .« .._ 5 5.04 4,1 4 21 41,1 4x,3_4._...".."' v 4'r-4 T1 8-9— TE—T R ESA S U'R E R S T D R. IV_ I l G M lly( 4935 5541404 110/11/39 MMINN. STATE TREASURER MMTR VEH LIC FEES 113,145.77 113,143.77 2251 0 01oz04 110/23189 AA. E. C M ENGINEERS FFEES FOR S 3, 051.54 ; GR a S.S.. p N_I. - b3lMAIN" MATERIAL 7 74.11 554 SUPPLIE$ VEHICLE 55 SUFP'L.IES JANITt3 16 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 443.6 ow 1.1VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WAGE 4 ry 1110/12/89 t4:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER ' FOR RER x i.D . , VOUCHER/ I _.. OHECk,._ lENOi R :HECk; 'VENDOR I i` :M _ ITEM—— OHrGk: ~ 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT ffJ 0 2288 042600 10/23/89 ASSN. OF TRAIN OFFICERS OF MN TRAVEL TRAIN 250000 250.00 12 13 2289 OA -0700 10/23/89 BAHT JAMES C. FEES' FOR SERVICE 1,985.63 i , 985.6.3 14 15 0._ " _-1 s SUPPLIES VEHICLE 43.14 'A A MAINT MATERIAL ry w7 20 i f•' SUPPLIES VEHICLE _ .._.9 . .4. .. . ..._. • 21 1 1 7 7r 2291 030300 10/23/89 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY LEGAL FISCAL 4.49 23I E ....__.. . 2292 080325 10/23/89 BLACKSTONEs GAIL TRAVEL & TRAIN 140.31 140,31 78 l3j 2293 080900 10/23/89 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS UTILITIES~ 24.54 30 OTHER CONST COSTS 21843.50 32 33 34 2294 0$1.300 10/23/89 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 165.04 35 ... tg 2295 090500 10/23/89 BRACKE, LOUIS CONTRACT PYM. 420.00 420.00 say; 39 t` R LY T F ]-R 1 LTT 3 AEI CE F EP A I R f A I TrT.I_...__r_ 41 r 42 2297 091450 10/23/89 BROWNING - FERRIS IND. FEL.S F'L ft SERVICES 101. 0 143 X44 FEES FOR SERVII CE _ .7 . 1 . ... 45 I 46 47 6 2298 101400 10/23 /89 BUILDERS SQUARE MAINT MATERIAL 27.27 27.27 ds 2299 101950 10/23/89 BYERLYS PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES 13.43 13 :.43 f S-0 0 1 10 0 550 10 / 2 3 119 C - Al RE-- , I N C * S U P P L I E S JANITOR .4 . 4 7 . _.. _ _....._ _.. _.... _....._ .... -_ ------ _..4 . ....4 53 54 2301 130550 10/23/89 CHEMLAWN, INC. REPAIR MAINT BLDG. 321.60 321.60 5 t 57 2302 130700 10/23/89 CHINESE LATERN PROGRAMS 285.60 255.60 5e i 5g i F 461 : :_.1,0 1072'3189 CHIPPEW'A 'SPRIN-GS FEES FOR _SER,V10E _. 8..i_...y,..._... 61 1 62 71 i 2304 140205 10/23/89 CLEAN STEP RUGS RUG CLEANING 25.70 25.70 64 14 2305 1 5 0 8 0 0 10/[ r 3 7 89 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE CONTRACT PYM. 10.00 10.00 67 Ali u 9 0 i {/23 /8 'COMM 55ONER OF TRANSPORTA Y N REPAIR .MAIN /E. . .._. .`,y 69 i 70L' 1 54 23107 152300 10/23/89 COPY DUPLICATING PROD. SUPPLIES OFFICE 150.00 150.00 72 73 2305 152400 10/23/89 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. OTHER IMP PURCHASED 44.62 ld SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 40.93 85.55 ' F: VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 "i 10/12/89 14:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER F.0R-PERIO VOUCHER/ ITEM I I EM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 61 81ol-- ... ....... . .. - ....... ... . ..... 1-01 2_31 8'9'- D A I -c 0 SUPPLIES -JANITOR ........ 2310 180900 10/23/89 DALEYV PAT 1 2FEESFORSERVICEltzlz.00 12000 3 2311 181300 10/Z3/89 DATA DISPATCH FEES FOR SERVICE 5.81 28.81 141 i BOO 1OI 319 DAMES WATER EGlUIMEhiT.. '"MAINTENANCE*' MAINTENANCE 32z.zo 3j644.40 7-313 19 0 D E N C E-N T_ER R O'G R A- M S- 36.38 36.38 2314 220170 10/23/89 DURANDILAWRENCE PLANNING DEPOSITS 14.75 14.75 9j 2315 230225 10/23/89. E.K.QUEHL SUPPLIES OFFICE 34-56 34.56 IF Z:3 D70— 1072-73-7uy EXS-F—SJ-D-E-G—vT-.-C a 2317 230900 10/23/89 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY DUPLICATING COSTS 24.57 DUPL'I C'A T I N_ G C 0 S T 8' DUPLICATING COSTS 108 ill DUPLICATING COSTS 68.80 DUPLICATING COSTS 1z:..85 DUPLICATINGDUPLICATING COSTS 103.19 491.40 Z318 231650 10/Z3/89 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE SUPPLIES OFFICE 86099 EQUIPM.,ENT OTHER 453. 2319 250200 I0 /Z:3/89 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC, MAINTENANCE 130.00 OTHER CONSTRUCTION ......... .. 69 118.00 69Z48,00 2320 Z60400 10/Z3/89 FAUST, DANIEL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 07' 14.07 Z2Z-1 73005 0-0-'- 7Z"-'3-T8_9— 6 N'T FOR ME_-'__v_CL 0 T H'--"-**'— 3 6 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 53:86 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 53.86 UNIFORMS' UNIFORMS CLOTH 53.86 UNIFORMS CLOTH 45,4Z LOTH--- 4 4 '22 UNIFORMS CLO,rH 45.42 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 45,42 uNIrF'0RMS'-&'_'CLOT_f4- 45.4 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 34,39 UNIFORMS &. CLOTH 34.39 N I F-0 R] lS2_--& C L'07 H-__-__ UNIFORMS & CLOTH 34,39 UNIFORMS & CLOTH UNIFORMS' 8i 5 4' UNIFORMS & CLOTH 1 5 UNIFORM$ CLOTH 18-54 VUUCHREG CITY OF MAP1 EWOOD PAGE 6 a 10/ 12/89 14:3 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER.e R 2 VOUCHER/ 4 HE C .. -_ .... VENDOR' ` C: HE. C V E NqD O R T M 1..T 1:. M t Et 5 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT s i7 6 8 Rj UNIFORMS & CLOTH. 13.54 10 91 UNIFORMS, & CLOTH c N -I F OR MS . CLOTH 195" 13 UNIFORMS CLOTH 19.47 t4 t l UNIFORMS CLOTH 19,47 15 ,p 13 Ma -_ CL iH 16 17 14 UNIFORMS CLOTH 9 , 74 85 r 40 18 19 15 4 5 r:: A, DAVIIi TRAVEL TRAINING v 20 21 22 181 2323 302600 10/2:'3/89 GLADSTONE LUMBER MART. SUPPLIES JANITORS 24.95 23 ? 24 1 MAINT MATERIAL 174.40 373.7`5 26 27 ' 21; r. } .. .. 3 0 1 5 10 7 2 t `? G1_E N SHE -FN i 1 : ,, u ._ v.. - ..._ ...... , .:.. M . `..: .. 2s 2325 302900 10/23/89 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD FEES FOR SERVICE 41.26 41.26 s' 25 33 i ,7F 2326 310650 10/231/89 GOPHER DISPOSAL FEES FOR SERVICE 69259.68 6v2159.68 35 1271 i 12 - 36 3 v FEES FC R. SE I1 C E ?8 , NA lN A AY ! 38n' 2328 340050 10/23/89 HEALTH RESOURSES FEES FOR SERVICE 28.66 139 1` '1 40 31 _F_EE_S _:F'1I{ ...'SE.F LC:E.._. m _ - _. 4.T ..___ 1 a FEES FOR SERVICE 14.33 as 1 44 1.. 40lili i0I 3t 9 HEJ1 Y RENTAL, INt OUTSIDE RENTAL EQUIPM- C-'NT` .Dt ` :.._Iiu 45 46 I3i 2330 350025 10/23/89 HICKS, DOUG PROGRAM REG FEES' 15.00 15.00 Fj 423:31 350800 10 /23/89 HO I S INGTON GROUR INC . PLANNING DEPOSITS X90.24 .. 0.Z >0 5 TRAVEL' . 53 -T HO R S NEL L ... U D I TH T'RA'IN 60_. U U- .............. 1411 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 18.90 54 1,421 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12..78 91.68 56 4,, 1. . • . r 158A,,; x.333 351400 10/23/89 HORWATH, TOM CONTRACT PYM. 11155.00 1 , 155 oOO 59 i a i "_ :. : ''' TRAVEL' _ _ 60 I TRAIN . _ . 1.9 5 . +.:0.D 1,. . Wd x..33 10'/Z3189--- I . C. . A . i 62 1f1 2335 390300 10/23/89 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES JANITOR 1 .42 s3 50 2336 400150 10/23/89 J . &J . TROPHIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 180.00 180.00 66 67 1 1GI43789 JrL. SHIELY CO. MAINT MATERIAL 1 959...0 70 2338 400700 10/23/89 J.P. FURNITURE: , INC:. REPAIR MA INT /E 95.00 95.00 71 3.39 410435 10/23 /89 KELLEY MIKE PROGRAM REG FEES 14.00 Cy 741,4. 0 76 j VOUC:HREG CITY OF. , MAPL.EWOOD PAGE 7 ( r - . 3 R/C:HECK REGISTER ! > 10/ 1./'+ 1...., VI.UC:HER - .. ._ _.. ._. _ __... ...:.. __ -. __ __ FOR PERIOD 10' a VOUCHER/ SHE C K : } VEN -II OR . --C H E'CK' 4_..._ _ V -END O R_.. -_._. _. _.. I T E M ITEMEM C HEC K NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT rE FR+ GRAM BUPF"L;I E __, 9_.28. 1 0 43c7300 IOI.3 /9 IN+GWLAN S PROGRAM, ,SUPPLIES 4.62 13. 15...00 _- 15.00 '33 2342 460300 10/23/89 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES WORKERS COMP INS 95 609.00 9, 609.00 Z3 43r . ~' lt3 343 480650 10;`2 - /89 LOMBARD I , DAVE PROGRAM REG FEES s 7 44 `- 0 00 U/ .73 LUGER LUMDE r C. MAINT MATERIAL X5.6 MAINT MATERIAL 49.92 FAINT MATERIAL 72.00:f MAINT MATERIAL 68.0 >; MAINT MATERIAL 72.00 347.5Z M :AC : U : Iq -is A » 3 U'B IS_ ..... 2346 500500 10/23/x9 M.J.F. MASONRY CONSTRUCTION LAND IMPROVEMENT 29950.00 21950.00 , 2 47 0 580 10 23f39 M. P. H. INDUSTRIES EUUI.PMENT OTHER 1 x#85.00 - 1, 435.00 361 V I T "5 S C E » 0 0 FEES FOR SERVICE z8z .00 658.00 its X349 5 30a 10 3/ iYIARfiIN MC ALLI ST SEES FOR SERVICE 54__.00..._ _. _.._._ _ _ _.. _ 45_.0 4i1 42 2350 511600 10/Z3/8? MASYS CORP TRAVEL & TRAIN 40.00 43 REPAIR MAIN..r. _ ._ . w 1_1'97ii - $5 REPAIR & MAINT /E 11132:00 29369.,00 461dii 1 T AV TRAINC,.75. IRE'S 1 HAEL R EL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 350.00 615.75 3 i 2353 540225 10/23/89 MIDWEST ANIMAL SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE n . . . 1 806.18 1 . ..__8.....0. 6.18 r 2354 540325 10/23/89 MIDWEST4 GANG INVEST. ASSN. TRAVEL TRAIN 130.00 130.00 r _Wr__ .._ ._... - _- _., a_.._..K .__.. .,., v.._,._ ... , 4 fi 4 0 52.3.5.5 54060 1 i23/8 MxLL RS T"AMI _. -.ME_A S._ _.:. EE ....EC k.- ..SE_ .vLC.E. Z356 541900 10/23/89 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT o "rHER IMPROVEMENTS 48.87 48.87 m ._. _.._....... .._ ..._.... _...._.._ _..n..._ ........ ................. 2357 541925 10/93/89 MINNESOTA CELLULAR TELEPHONE 9.15 - 9.15 b i Z35 5 4 :; 5 t I 3 7 9 M l hi hl E S O TVDOO B 00 K S'-____-'___-_-- z 3 115 9 551200 10/23/89 MN NATURALIST ASSOCIATION SUB $.& Mf MBER`a 60.00 60.00 ,e 2360 551400 10/23/8? MN PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT .OTHER 2981Z,z a j V OUC:HREC 2377 710400 10/23/89 cII OF i APL. WOOD BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PAGE 3r 10/12/89 14x 32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER 2:378 720780 10/23/89 PRENTICE HALL INC. BOOKS 42.53 42.53 VOUCHER/ 1.,51 t T-' r- ______T''I O__.._.___.1..023' HE C,i }. .. ,... ... V ND'01R CHECK."- 1 ECK. V F..ND OR TEM _.. - ......... . -._. _.,..... I T.hl w.: .._..........«...,».. -.,w.. HEGF; NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT RAMSEY EMERG. MEDICAL SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 501.75 501.75 PSG RA S t P 1"M - i, 2362 570090 10/Z3/39 MOGREN BROS* MAINT MATERIAL 16.00 SUPPL I E5 JANITOR MAINT MATERIAL 16.00 MAINT MATERIAL 139-152 i...- ,... -.w... r•..... n.,. e... r. e•..•.....w..._..... .,,. o...+.-.....-.. n...,.,............................. wa...... ww.. w.............. .w..._..„.+.,...w.....,.w.w.... ..w..........:.:..,...•...M. Y w .. ..,.e.+r............, MAINT MATERIAL 130.00 MAINT MATERIAL 16,00 MAINT MATERIAL. 5 . .. i '' %i MAINT MATERIAL 16.00 504.64 E ' ! 2364 5'i0500 10/3/ MOTOROLA, INC SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 140. 140000 i- -i 2365 610200 10/23/89 MULWEE, GEORGE TRAVEL TRAIN 5.21 t -1 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 10.66 15.87 2366 630700 10/23/ $39 NATIONAL CHEMSEARCH SUPPLIES VEHICLE 104.25 104.25 7f j ?a 16T JJi V 4 I1 2ti:J ! 89 N4R G, (Url (' mEN 1 0I-F14 w ... 1L 7.00 187.60 2365 640550 10/23/89 NELSON, JEAN VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 13.00 13.00 l X36'9 640600 10/23/89 NELSON! KAREN A TRAVEL TRAIN 51.33 51.3 X711 3 I r 0r-vERT r FEES FOR S E R V I .0 E 0.0. f 086 FI3 .. 2371 660275 10/23/89 NO.ST.PAUL- MAPLEWOOD ROTARY SUBS MEMBERS 100.00 100.00 E 2372 661105 10/23/89 NORTH STAR TURFS INC. MAINT MATERIAL 137.00 MAINT MATERIAL 200.00 357.00 R.i t7 i 2373 662200 14/23/89 NORTHWEST FABRICS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 99.45 99.45 325.00 325, 00` i`1 2375 670500 10/2 3/8'9 NUTE.SON, LAVE'RNE VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 84 .76 14f TRAVEL & TR'AI'N .:1.7...05__ i471 TRAVEL & TRAIN 61.01 362,82 CT ELEl 1, iEROTT "_.:.. ASSN: ES......CIITUtfiIT.. _- ..-_ t0 : 2377 710400 10/23/89 PEOPLES ELECTRIC: BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 49935.57 4,985o57 152 2:378 720780 10/23/89 PRENTICE HALL INC. BOOKS 42.53 42.53 1.,51 t T-' r- ______T''I O__.._.___.1..023' T- - l- .___: P- RO 3E_ I .O iA.C..R 3 E:E- ._.._.____. _ . _ . _ _ ___... _. _ ... FEES FO•R___- SEHV -1_CE . _ - -. ____.__ l' 5fj 23810 742114 10/23/89 RAMSEY EMERG. MEDICAL SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 501.75 501.75 0 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 9 6 10/12/89 14:32 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PE'Rl'O'D 10 VOUCHER/ C-H -CK—_VEND0 _R _C _HLX ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 0-- 9SUPPLIES ''V'E H -I C LE'' .00 238Z 743100 10/4 3/89 RAZSKAZOFF, DALE UNIFORMS & CLOTH 103.00 103.00 12 13 0 1 2383 761200 10/23/89 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 146.22 146.22 2 0.0 5. 0 - R 0 G RA M EG FEES -15T81' "' l- R, O'.E H RE N B'A C H', JIM :ES 1 ti j Z 3 8 5 76Z300 10 8 9 ROYAL DOWNS FEES FOR SERVICE 34.50 91 5 F` EE S- -'F'O R__ -S`E_RV -I -C E6 FEES FOR SERVICE 42" T 00' 7 FEES FOR SERVICE 39.00 162.00 9 PROGRAM REG FEES 7.50 0 2386 770850 10/23/89 RYDEENj DAVE 7650 1072378 --RYD` R I NS`P`O-R'TA-T-I-O7N-—- —-_O`UT'S-I DE-'-R E'NT-AL__EQU7I_P___'____ _r3Z 1-32 OD7-- 13 14 23819 780300 10/23/89 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC* SUPPLIES OFFICE 3.96 3.96 33 6 2389 780350 10/23/89 SE.Hs OUTSIDE ENG'FEES 9,781.7 l E,7 OUTSID.7 ENG FEES 11947.68 136 FEES'- -4O_U_TS'TD`E__'EN'G 37 9 39 0 2390 790150 10/23/89 SCHMOOCK, JOHN UNIFORMS CLOTH 201100 20.00 40 41 2391 790500 IO/Z3/89 'SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA TRAVEL TRAIN 180. 0 1 lao 4.00 42 44 14 Z 3 9 Z 8 10450---- -10 M 78 9 --SH-ER]4Al"-00fS-A LAN N-1-NG--DE-PO',9-rT-S`---- _ .. - _,:.T'. _ . . _ f. 6 45 461 15 X471 2393 820290 10/23/89 SKWERESI TOM PROGRAM REG FEES 20.00 20.0.0 1 2394 SZO610 10/23/89 SNELLING COMPANY R.EPAIR -MAINT/B 96.00 96,00 9Jt C'Etoz 11 SUPPLIES OFFICE 4 lie 12 SUPPLIES OFFICE 109.45 SUPPLIES -OFFICE 14 SUPPLIES OFFICE 7,97 `=I 95 SUPPLIES OFFICE. 51.1i th 46 S U P P'L'I' ES. -OF F'I C-E___--_-' 3-2-' 7 Z--__________-_-__—'l 47 SUPPLIES OFFICE 181.30 0 58 SUPPLIES OFFICE 38.07 SUPPLIES OFF I CE----'-- 66 49 SUPPLIES OFFICE 125 04 66 67 SUPPLIES OFFICE 647wZ41 Z396 840400 10/23/89 ST,PAUL CITY OF FEES FOR SERVICE 147.80 147.80 70 71 72 4 00ST. PAUL MEDICAL CENT[.-'R FEES FOR'SERVICE 73 FEES FOR SERVICE 74v00 74 571 761 iVOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 10 k] 10 12 819 14 3. 2, VOUCHER/CHECK REGIS TE R FOP' PEPI'06- 1 ' t"O' VOUCHER/ CHECK-'' VENDOR- CHECK' VENDOR' ITEM MA CHECK" NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPT10N AMOUNT AMOUNT j--2398, 841400 TRAVE 9 10, 2399 8435715 10/23/89 STRtICHERS GUNS SUPPLIES RANGE 203.34 203.34 2400 850600 10/Z3/89 SUPERAMERICA SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT* 63.99 4 FUEL OIL 16.17 somi6 17 2401 8-51550 10/23/89 SYSTEMS SERVIC5 COMPANY REPAIR MAINT/U 345,,45 345,45 2015; 1 3 f 9" 11 - I.... . I r9UPPLIES _lFFICE 74 2 SUPPLIES OFFICE 238:02 3 191 SUPPLIES OFFICE 51 630 24 SUPPL 46 184.9 ij 7i 2403 866100 10/23/89 O PARTST. J. AUTO SUPPLIES VEHICLE 58.86 S UPPLI 4 '94- 29 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 8: 8z 30 SUPPLIES JANITOR 17.95 130.57 321 25 33 1,16 2404 860125 10/23/89 T.A. SCHIFSKY SONS, INC MAINT MATERIAL 259Z9 34 35 7 1 MAINT MATERIAL 160 .00 36 MAINT MATERIAL 1, 134.00 1,553.2 37 qj 38 2405 860315 10/Z3/89 T.K.D.A. ou"rsIDE ENG FEES 121.70 ao, 0'U`TSl'D- -'ENG'--FEE9-'- 0 i OUTSIDE ENG FEES 41114.4 42i 43 OUTSIDE ENG FEES 9549821 14 OUTSIDE ENG FEES 45 2406 860650 10/23/89 TARGET STORES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 89.95 46i 47 48 3 S `U'P P-L 1 -E S F F It E- l' 491 SUPPLIES *OFFICE 2.16 SUPPLIES OFFICE 2.16 52 OFFI'CE' SUPPLIES 53 SUPPLIES OFFICE 2.16 54 55 SUPPLIES OFFICE 2.16 SUPPLIES OFFICE 2.16. 107.2 583 60 T K A N E A W'I--*,'l N S' POL'AR CHEV VEHICL'E'S P'URCHASt-D'- 4 0 61 REPAIR & MAINT/V 47.76 119694.76 62 63 64 491--7408 65 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT' 19:40 63.40 sfi 67 68 5?i - ------ - - TRUCK UTILITIES 'MFG. REPAIR MAINT/V 69 REPAIR & MAINT/V 31.56 70 71 REPAIR & MAINT/V 41.65 35.26 72 4,i, 73 2410 882800 10/23/89 TWIN CITY TRANSPORT FEES FOR SERVICE 265.00 265.00 75 76 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 11 10/12/8-9 14 :32 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 10- 2 3 3 VOUCHER/ 4 4 END C- R_.._.— C`HE-C`K V"E N D OR I T EX ITEM CHECK 5 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 7 6 8 U. WEST COMMU.NI.C.AT.L.ONS ._. TEi:.EPHONE: ,S.0 s4i --8'9'0'90"0'--,----1-07 2-3 /a a TELEPHONE 50.594 10 s TELEPHONE 50 .94 2 C` E L E F' E-i C.j hi E ". ___ _.. .._._ ..___._______._ 54.44 3 11 TELEPHONE. 27 7 . SS 15 12 TELEPHONE 1 071 .90 6 13 1 TELEPHONE _, 4S . 74 171. 14 TELEPHONE 45.74 15 TELEPHONE. 4 , :74 16 TEL EP H "0 N E- 4S .7 4 _ 2111 17 TELEPHONE: 4G' .74 18 TELEPHONE 48.74 241 1y TELEPH0NE S . 8-- ;. 20 TELEPHONE 34.65 21 TELEPHONE. 34.68 7 . fiELE'PI4 -FNE _- ..._....-...._... 22 X6.57 23 TELEPHONE S .04 24 TELEPHONE 34.68 31f 25 TELEPHONE. 4.0 w`331 26 TELEPHONE 338 .97 341 27 TELEPHONE 273 64 361 28 _. _ ___ ______ ______ __ ._T E_L_E P H O NE. _— ' . s 5 37 29 TELEPHONE. 53 , GD 38 30 TELEPHONE 50.88 3s , 40 TELEPHONE. _._ 1 32 TELEPHONE 47.5 42 3 TELEPHONE 1' 1 . G4 , 43 i4 3 2412 900100 10/23/89 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS & CLOTH 146.40 46 3a UNIFORMS & CLOTH 4.2.30 481 37 SUPP'LIES._.`EUUIPMEN.fi -_ .10$000... ....._ _. 4 ! 38 UNIFORMS & CLOTH _ .110.. 60 5u 39 UNIFORMS i CLOTH 71 40 U N I FOR MS CLOTH __ .5. _M,9. 41 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 186495 !4 42 SUPPLIES OFFICE _ 18.00 56 .... UNIFORMS 5743 44 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 9:95 ,a M5 45 UNIFORMS + CLOTH ZZ7.55 066 o QZ eu 47 2415 900600 10 /Z3/89 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 73.00 br j, fi 48 SUPPLIES EQUIPME.NYT M"021 °- 'o01 63 5U 414 910500 10/Z3./89 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL FEES FOR SERVICE 346900 51 FEES FOR SERVICE 199 .Ott 6,4as Y..'_ __, _ ._._ - " "'- ,...._.-._.._ --.- 4..,--- ._.....,u......._._.- ,. ._ ..._....,_._._... _ ..._._... . k FEES FOR aERV t -C -. ._ _ .... Y.. O -_ w_ .._...... $ 7 -a0--F 6 70 VI 53 1 54 x:415 940600 10/Z3/89 WELCHLIN, CAD30T TRAVEL TRAIN 21,66 21 .66 r2 55 7;i 5v Z416 950150 10/Z3/89 WOODBURY MECHANICAL. SEWER PF -.R 150,09 ADD 74 7J A5T _ - r.ln.. , _.. ..-... ..n,.,e,., .,mei.,..si- a.mmh«. wwwxa.aprr !azR." __.___... L..,_.a— .....,.,,,._. ..... -,: — 1._,_.. -,n. „,,,. ,..... - ,.+,w;.....fww...r. ,- e....me.. ..x.S.".^^c'MF .*n"i'* °i °r'Fw'...''ni' 77*" k' SnCIR "'F+¢tTAfaAR""*mP.HT ltl* '. +m'°"Mh'Y`Te'rmt'nwia aP•mY.x r" ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/13/89 CHECK #11897 - CHECK #12053 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY McGUIRE, MICHAEL A. 21782.34 BLACKSTONE, GAIL 11510.90 WEILAND, ELIZABETH 11181.30 ZAWACKI, KATHRYN 11034.10 BEHM, LOIS N. 1,034.10 JAHN, DAVID J. 901067 SWANSON, LYLE 11073.53 CUDE, LARRY J. 276.80 OSTER, ANDREA J. 902.28 MIKISKA, WILLIAM 172.80 FAUST, DANIEL F. 21033.30 TAYLOR, LINDA 11050.28 MATHEYS, ALANA K. 11083.88 VIGNALO, DELORES A. 11'083.88 ANDERSON, CAROLE J. 11308.68 LA MOTTE, MARLENE 210.00 AURELIUS, LUCILLE E. 1,878.90 SELVOG, BETTY D. 238.00 SCHADT, JEANNE L. 11038.92 KELSEY, CONNIE L. 633.39 VIETOR, LORRAINE S. 972.68 HENSLEY,, PATRICIA A. 572.57 JAGOE, CAROL 732.68 CARLE, J EANETTE E. 21075.53 OLSON, SANDRA 520.13 RONGSTAD, CARO.LEE 113.50 PALANK, MARY KAY 732.68 COLLINS, KENNETH V. 21084.50 RICHIE, CAROLE L. 997.93 SVENDSEN, JOANNE M. 1,469.48 NELSON, ROBERT D. 11800.50 FULLER, ELAINE 419.58 MARTINSON, CAROL F. 11056.59 STILL, VERNON T. 11378.28 SKALMAN, DONALD W. 11442.72 FRASER, JOHN 909.48 NELSON, CAROL M. 21043.71 MORELLI, RAYMOND J. 11367.91. STEFFEN, SCOTT L. 11460.95 ARNOLD, DAVID L. 11617.48 BANICK, JOHN J. 11568.86 BOHL, JOHN C. 11397.42 CAHANES, ANTHONY G. 11800.50 CLAUSON, DALE K. 11403.88 MOESCHTER,,RICHARD M. 11455.66 ATCHISON, JOHN H. 11403.88 YOUNGREN, JOHN 11756.02 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/13/89 CHECK #11897 - CHECK #12053 EMPLOYEE NAME PELTIER, WILLIAM F. SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS J. WELCHLIN, CABOT V. LANG, RICHARD J. RAZSKAZOFF, DALE HERBERT, MICHAEL J. DREGER, RICHARD C. STAFNE, GREGORY L. BECKER, RONALD D. HALWEG, KEVIN R. STOCKTON, DERRELL T. PAULOS, J R., PAUL G. BOWMAN, RICK A. RYAN, MICHAEL P. KARIS, FLINT D. HEINZ, STEPHEN J. GRAF, DAVID M. THOMALLA, DAVID J. PALMA; STEVEN T. VORWERK, ROBERT E. BERGERON, JOSEPH A. MEEHAN, JAMES MELANDER., JON A. SAUNDERS, SARAH EMBERTSON, JAMES M. WILLIAMS, DUANE J. RABINE, JANET L.. STAHNKE, JULIE BOYER, SCOTT K. WALDT, CYNTHIA FEHR, JOSEPH NELSON, KAREN A. FLAUGHER, JAYME L. WEGWERTH, JUDITH A. HAIDER, KENNETH G. CHLEBECK, JUDY M. PRIEFER, WILLIAM MEYER, GERALD W. KANE, MICHAEL R. NAGEL, BRYAN LUTZ, DAVID P. KLAUSING, HENRY F. SCHMOOCK, JOHN HELEY, RONALD J. OSWALD, ERICK D. FREBERG, RONALD L. CASS, WILLIAM C. GROSS PAY 1,617.48 1,327.08 1,343.54 1,403.88 1,454.28 1,454.28 1,617.48 1,416.83 1,467.70 1,946.33 1,378.28 1,205.83 1,388.21 1,677.27 1,390.28 1,540.01 1,467.08 1,659.45 1,446.32 1,467.08 1,480.00 1,703.00 1,467.08 756.58 1,538.10 1,354.90 1,048.35 1,029.48 1,013.62 804.68 902.28 1,048.68 1,067.88 599.02 2,084.50. 1,087.88 985.48 1,219.80 1,342.28 1,022.92 1,132.68 1,200.84 1,001.77 1,154.28 1,128.28 1,159.32 1,704.68 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/13/89 CHECK #11897 - CHECK #12053 EMPLOYEE NAME ZACK, TODD LINDBLOM, RANDY ELIAS, JAMES G. PECK, DENNIS L. PRIEBE, WILLIAM IRISH., BRUCE A. GEISSLER, WALTER M. METZ, TERRY LOFGREN, JOHN R. ODEGARD, ROBERT D. BRENNER, LOIS J. KRUMMEL, BARBARA A. STAPLES, PAULINE JONES, LUTHER TRAVERS, DANIEL ANDERSON, ROBERT S. LINDORFF, DENNIS P. GARRY, WILLIAM HELEY, ROLAND B. MARUSKA, MARK A. SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES LECOUNT, TERRY SCHNEIDER, GREGORY BURKE, MYLES R. SHELDON, LEO HANNEGAN, ANDREA MILLER, SHERRAL DREGER, KARI FORD, JENNIFER GRAF, MICHAEL MEYERS, PETRA, DONAHUE, SCOTT RAHN, CARY WARD, ROY G. TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS J. GREW- HAYMAN, JANET M. NELSON, JEAN HORSNELL, JUDITH A. HUTCHINSON, ANN E. FISHER, LYNE DOHERTY, KATHLEEN'M. BARTA, MARIE L. OLSON, GEOFFREY W. SUNDGAARD, L. MISKELL, NANCY LIVINGSTON, JOYCE L. ROBERTS, KENNETH GROSS PAY 378.00 1,532.72 1,334.28 1,770.66 1,448.16 1,694.44 1,394.75 995.08 925.48 1,87.8.90 1,067.88 486.34 1,642.28 72.00 81.00 1.,132.68 1,132.68 992.68 1,209.48 1,639.10 818.28 460.00 468.00 1,197.48 20.00 128.63 125.00 112.88 70.00 17.50 90.00 100.00 137.00 406.40 1,372.68 1,157.49 379.65 567.94 819.52 91.00 1,067.22 954.28 1,878.90 183.00 328.59 543.86 1,047.30 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAYROLL CHECKS ISSUED FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10/13/89 CHECK #11897 - CHECK #12053 EMPLOYEE NAME GROSS PAY EKSTRAND, THOMAS G. 11467.71 BERNIER, SHAWN 300.00 OSTROM, MARJORIE 11563.08 CARVER, NICHOLAS N. 11187.88 LOFGREN, ROSANNE 31.50 WENGER, ROBERT J. 11286.28 LA CASEE, TELLY 105.00 LA CASEE, CASEY 168.00 NADEAU, EDWARD A. 11215.76 MULWEE, GEORGE W. 11152.68 NUTESON, LAVERNE S. 11536.68 BREHEIM, ROGER W. 11178.48 EDSON, DAVID B. 11174.28 GERMAIN, DAVE 11174.28 MULVANEY, DENNIS M. 11288.68 SPREIGL, GEORGE C. 11167.88 171,040.56 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 $ 71057.50 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION 25..1105.00 AFSCME 2725 491.36 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS 19 -3988 160.00 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC 18.00 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 191.00 L.E.L.S. 594.00 33,616.86 GRAND TOTAL $204,657.42 L' f r Act ion by Council. l Endorsed,.. ediz 1.ed.. MEMORANDUM Re ° ectec.m Da. to TO: City Manager FROM: Shawn Bernier Planning Intern SUBJECT: PUD Time Extension . LOCATION: Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street APPLICANTS /OWNER: The Knights Group (Ken Gervais) PROJECT: Beaver Creek Apartments DATE October 9, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting a one -year time extension for the Beaver Creek Apartment planned unit development (PUD)1 The property is located at the northwest corner of Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street. (Refer to the letter on page 7.) BACKGROUND February 11, 1985: The City Council approved the original conditional use permit for this PUD. October 24, 1988:. The City Council approved the revision of the conditional use permit for the PUD. This included changing the conditions of approval for the PUD. (Refer to the minutes . on page 4.) DISCUSSION The applicant has complied with all of the conditions of approval. Staff is not aware of any concerns or problems with this project. RECOMMENDATION Approval of a one -year time extension for the Beaver Creek Apartments PUD subject to the October 24, 1988 conditions of approval. Attachments 1. Location Map 2, Site Plan 3. October 24, 1988 City Council Minutes S BTIMEXTEN 1 s R i : . (PUU) ;I BC F i R3 R3 AVIV R2) F F R 3 A vt J R t R R F MI 21 Pool M2 r ate, K RD R 3 r / 1 R3 _ BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS --} tip.. "rti•.v:'•,: WUU) 00 LR c --- BEAVER CREEK CONDOMINIUMS at R 3 A vaAr. AtiO p Ai R t PUD) R,.,,r+ L F STERLING GLEN QUADS a.tir. A 1vt / L R i F J Q R a 7 c j* i R R A 1 ..,, w t 5 t A+.t R Av r A A R z Y L C ;c R R L . a R F F 1 R • BC • LOCATION MAP Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street 2 1 Li Attachment 1 I % too ZZ" lb 00, I•• M S PRAIRIE 0 of .00 0, lop .0j. p 40 Op 0.0 0, 4 0.00. It 0 OFOp got - 0 Op Future Building p Op • . 00 4 0 &ITZ DATA to r fok O-mPft 4w armqV, 0 t 1% . r/•, • F.4" a pw jj r11 r >< I 0 Iowa do 01 41 A41 ILN DIN; 1% A Finished Buildings Art or PIP ft. 16% • ft% • PRELIMINARY UTILITY IICWidAfIC 1 ' -BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS 0 N •KITCH PLAN 02 • w"Wova" ivy It bx or so 1 4j t: trL SITE PLAN BEAVER CREEK APARTMENTS Attachment 2 j 518 Cop Avenue Assessment Appeal a. Act Manager Haider presented the Staff report. b. Mayor Gre 4 moved the recommendation of taff and approve the revisions to Coe Avenue F 'ect 85 -26 assessments Seconded by Councilmem r Rossbac Ayes Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Juker, and Rossbach Nay Councilmember Bastian. 6. Gervais Avenue Truce Restriction a. Acting M ager Haider presented the St -f report b. Co zC(1) member Juker moved first reading of a ordinance rester ict i n l-.raf- c il des i. luiLed streets. \, econded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. P.U.D. Time Extension and Revision of Conditions: Beaver Creek Apartments a. Acting Manager Haider presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following; resolution and moved its adoption: 88--10 -.178 WHEREAS, the City, of Maplewood initiated a cond.i ti.oiill use pei- i i t revision to amend the Beaver Creek Apartment planned unit developiiieia PUD) at the following- described property: 1'hli L pee r t of t --he Near thwes.t 1/4 of the Sou tIieast 1/4 .1 y i iii; southeaterly of a line from the Northeast corner of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 to a point on the west Line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 and 450 feet south of the original C. St . P. M. & 0. Ry. . right of way also the Scar L11- wes t 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; all in Section 24, 'I'ol-vii sh i p 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, subject to street right -of -way. This property is more commonly described as northwest of Ivy Avenue and Ferndale Street. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use Perin i t. i_s (,is follows: 1. The City Council approved the original conditional use hermit for this PUD on February 11., 1985. 210 The Maplewood City Council colisidered the above- refereliced con- ditional use permit revision on October 10, 1988. 10/24 attachment 3 NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE Iff RESOLVED BY THE MAPLI11-WOOD CITY COUNC I I that the above -- described conditional use permit revision be approved 01 the bas i s of the following findings -of -fact 1. The use is' in conformity with the City's comprehensive elan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 40 The use would nd)t de rec. i a t.e 'O rer - , va l liesI11ty • 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the 110 ises, glare, smoke, dust, odor, felines, water peal. l ut:. i on , wNt er 1A111-()( (, , vibration, general unsiglitliness, electrical inLeri erence car other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.. i 7. The use would be serviced by. essential public services, such as x streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural ;m(l scenic features into the development design. The use would Ci1lISe (111. 11i l adverse e1V1 r011'lt X11 c((c t .4-46J.U. Approval is subject to the following conditions 1. The northerly facing roof area for the northwest structure nlcly drain to Jim's Prairie, provided predevelopment runoff levels are not exceeded. All other impervious surface area shall drain away from Jim s Prairie 2. No herbicides, pesticides or fertilizers shall be applied to any area that drains to the prairie, unless the type, amount and location are approved by the City. 3. The emergency exit road shall be constructed from the 3partnlent-, project to Maryland Avenue to support emergency vehicles and the pathway shall be paved from the apartments to the proposed pr i -- vaLe street hi the condominium project pr i car to the i ssillim.c. ()f all occupancy permit. A public easement for emergency vehicle 5 1024 jg access shall be recorded from the apartment parking lot to f Maryland Avenue, over-the proposed path and future private street in the Beaver Lake condominium project. The emergern.cy vehicle access must be maintained and kept free of obstruc- tions by the respective property owners. 4. Before an occupancy permit is issued, a statement shall be recorded with the property, granting the City the right to burn Jim's Prairie and maintain the fence along the south boundary of Jim's Prairie that is located approximately Five feet into the apartment property. The language of this state- ment shall be approved by the City. 5. Approval includes the site plan enclosed in the JC-1n11f-1ry 161 1985 staff report. Any changes that result in an increase in .density or-change in building type or site plan shall require a public hearing and approval by the City Council G. This approval supersedes the conditioIls of initial ,_Ipprov ll ; granted February 11, 19850 Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all. 20 /HRC Commissioner Liaison a. Ac 'ng Manager Haider presented the Staff r ort. b. Counci member Juker moved to approve th f ollo•tino as recommended 1. Aband the policy of having an ppointed commissioner serve as a li 'son between the HRA d HRC. 2. Author. a.e t . e. IIRA and IIRC -o independently advertise rind r'c.CO111111c..11d t OUnc. L.1 Lhe cho i.c:c 1. car a comm ss on (2, r t_c> t c p I l c resigned Commi. ioner P ey. Seconded by.Councilmember erson. Ayes - all. 3. Holloway - Schedule Public He ring a. Acting Manager II 'der presented the Staff report, b. Mayor Greavu troduced the folixwing resolution and moved its adoption: 88 -10 -1 WHERE the City engineer for the City o laplewood has been been authoriz d and directed to prepare a report with reference to the i 111prove- ment o Holloway AMILIC, Beebe to Furness, Ci.t ), Project 87 -14, b), c on struc ion of a bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter Lind u ti ties, and 6 1 0/24 /433 138 Design & Development Co. Inc. 2419 No. Margaret St. North St. Paul, MN 55109 Phpne 770 -6138 October 9, 1989 City of Maplewood 1830 E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, Mn 55109 Att: Shawn Beriner Re: Beaver Creek Apt. PUD Dear Shawn: Please ask the City Council to extend our Beaver Creek Apa.rtr.ent PUD. r---. 'Thank you, Ge- rvai s ter Zqual Housing Opportunity i s %.a a a ...a. FROM: Shawn Bernier - Planning Intern SUBJECT: Time Extension - Preliminary Flat LOCATION: Desoto Street and Ripley.Avenue APPLICANT: Donald and Lorraine Torgerson OWNERS: Donald and Lorraine Torgerson, Erik.Oelker, Jean Edholm, John Lund, Leo Markfort, and Dennis Cummins PROJECT: Torgerson Addition DATE: October 2, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicants are requesting a one -year time extension for the Torgerson Addition preliminary plat. The property is located east of Desoto and north of Ripley Avenue. (Refer to letter on page 9*) BACKGROUND On,October 24, 1988, the City Council conditionally approved the Torgerson Addition preliminary plat for seventeen.residential lots. (Refer to the.October 24, 1988, City Council minutes on page 6.) DISCUSSION The applicants have been delayed in proceeding with this development due to the unavailability of a storm 'sewer system. The Roselawn- Edgerton storm sewer project will have a public hearing November 16, 1989. If the storm sewer project is approved by the City Council, then one of the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat will have been met. If the project is not approved, the applicant Would have to phase the subdivision with on -site ponding.. In addition, The applicants are having difficulty in negotiating the purchase of the land for the right -of -way for the new Ripley Avenue at Desoto Street. The applicants recently hired a fee appraiser to assist them in negotiating for the purchase of the land. There has not been any changes to the City Code or Comprehensive Plan that warrant any changes to the October 24., 1988 conditions of approval. RECOMMENDATION Approval of a one -year time extension. for the Torgerson Addition preliminary plat subject to the October 24, 1988, conditions of approval. Attachments 1. Location Map 2 Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Proposed Preliminary Plat 40 Minutes from October 24, 1988 Council Meeting 5, Applicants Letter of Request SBTORGERSN mb i d 1 49 c: n u ii E91 35 10 36] LITTLE CANADA ll Q--l!j LOCATION MAP 3 2400 N. sA iNr At tc -tch yen t; 1 6f GPNon poOon PKWY L Keller Lake 60 / Rourd PA UL Q LN 75 75 1 75 -751 1 75 455.r. t C' 92 L L_. Alm/ -AVE. t ifirA 13 7LA27 33 3 L o 0 o a CC 15 0 -N4-AC. co of F' /•w i L ep f 1854 c`w Vacated Street Easement 546536 4 tic 1848, , I 1 1 ON u' ,. 1838 Y, 24a` Proposed Split Line - '' 1'1830; 1c) i81 o 378c , r-% D y G o ON 1297 ° 3 4 fl 111 ( ! a a V% " ( 8 2 2 - w ( 1 1798 4 SUMRISF 0 1 I vwwra 1790 c 0 U )t r v (: •,f 0101789. , _ s2 21 co toS3.4 YA AVF 01 M Moog cc 01 o ' G,1-4 y Ao - p 66 0 1c o Fib i20.'I IZ0.7 I 3 4l Z r L17815004 • 1780 z_ -- -• ^— oT o + 3 (o 3 20 3 vr 4 cc 5 J23 ., z, , 17 t - - 6 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 nccaci,mcnc 2 4 N OD ult 88ac Ck It s so 90 0 g) 501 3 ° ; 3 ! C3 2 3 3). 3 4) 3 S O7 t?J C4) s r s 1 81 o eo e5 IQ 0 oil 57 ow", P O n A v o E. 40 a, - 7 rI ,s 1 18 59 4 f.- 512 522 526 o o 9. 1., o L 9Z L o• aL s ll 02 5 7 G ( 1 N (11856 `J I ,; M D wag- M 502 _ 00S r 3 D S D n) q/21 n 2L of F' /•w i L ep f 1854 c`w Vacated Street Easement 546536 4 tic 1848, , I 1 1 ON u' ,. 1838 Y, 24a` Proposed Split Line - '' 1'1830; 1c) i81 o 378c , r-% D y G o ON 1297 ° 3 4 fl 111 ( ! a a V% " ( 8 2 2 - w ( 1 1798 4 SUMRISF 0 1 I vwwra 1790 c 0 U )t r v (: •,f 0101789. , _ s2 21 co toS3.4 YA AVF 01 M Moog cc 01 o ' G,1-4 y Ao - p 66 0 1c o Fib i20.'I IZ0.7 I 3 4l Z r L17815004 • 1780 z_ -- -• ^— oT o + 3 (o 3 20 3 vr 4 cc 5 J23 ., z, , 17 t - - 6 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 nccaci,mcnc 2 4 N sK r.ai• ars++. w..• •ON . .. M w co«s M l T 1 t1 t 1NM/ 1 t A f roa s wd.-.-c-. - n a1 •L. 4" mf c e 0 E urN w u Io sag i• • e -•a "` • 41101% N GINEERING at f..r/.w• / r. COMPAN0 INC. s" n . . P R ELMN A R Y PLAT taah rr 000. %NOON *MAI 1. BE LWl 9)U AVE j DON TORGERSON PROPRTY I L r 1 i a!r• f •o.es 3 i I i 3 i . I • / ! va ao.n....E 1 d r arltarrc t at an a.ommomac d a•s/.s A. 2L laimmar Q-4, ammummom- j 1 1 A 1 t t• f L~ 1 1 1/ K '`•t r t\ I1 1' T 1 i • I1 _y Yl+.Y___ )irlt'ti H v t= t 1' : \I L7 1 - • ! t jummomm# 2s. am" t Irc la! hoot Inwood . ao, 1.0 M M f•. a.sa b ,+.a at a. a.rft 4n 6.0% at am r1 ILl1 t t L ; • low, of •..o... ""A a+io.dmit t d or owano t i d a.e a mummL a.•. 11. suep b. a•q• - AD OUTLOT A I i i AW 0 1 r I 2 I C tttrA sL*#MAtY r *. r.& ..tA M. Lei Is .c S I 4 IIs •I aWI.R t 1•.iM I & K- 1 t IIrs f. .sa 11 /!! out I I.I L l7_ _ t >t , a1 /./- I t! K- 1 3 cr1 rat Aft AM~ i . \ 1 I l.1 /. *wn.fa 1 I &"A" EST •i• ••at 1•..• • 11 Ivtaaat art .•al. .. •t 401 r+r SO 0 50 100 190 1 3 to* Ool A 7 t 1 7 1ima..r1 t N I Ll i ad 1 I .•. .ry. 11• f .I t AVE to t r t. t r 04 pop t as W-0 OUTLOT 8 X) vn/ N tw di 0, Ate~ 3,j 1------- - - - - -- i to RIf•l[T AVE. arcs. c-t- r--------------- - - - - -- i r---------------- 1 t 1 Iii .) t r11J.. It 1 11.. 1 o t 1 i 1 + C+ 1 Ai_ sK r.ai• ars++. w..• •ON . .. M w co«s M l T 1 t1 t 1NM/ 1 t A f roa s wd.-.-c-. - n a1 •L. 4" mf c e 0 E urN w u Io sag i• • e -•a "` • 41101% N GINEERING at f..r/.w• / r. COMPAN0 INC. s" n . . P R ELMN A R Y PLAT taah rr 000. %NOON *MAI a.... « a DON TORGERSON PROPRTY I L r 1 i a!r• f •o.es 3 coo Laf7 r. t a rrKl 1. taJRatrr+U t E . a.la1..LSMA WVV F" 4 it 1000 l b. a. r'rel.:imInary Flat b. t)t.i.liLy J outirig Approval C. 11alf-Width Street Variation d. Cul -de -sac Variation d the me for a public. hears np, rc;arding 1. Mayor Greavu convene Torgerson for approval of a prelimi -- the request of Donald and Lorraine create 17 single dwelling lots and two outlots; to route r plat tonayp, es along a corridor with more than eight percent grade; two utilitl g variations from the platting code . 1 Develo ment ' Olson presented the Staff report. 2. Director of Community p r Fischer resented the Planning Commission report. 3. Commissioner P j applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 4. Mr. Don Torgerson, the app P t Greavu called for Proponents and opponents. The following 5. Mayor I F r voiced their opin ions: t Julie Cummins, 1790 Desoto fi Mary Bullich, Edina Realty 4` Gary Bos t rom , 546 Bellwood Resident at 526 Bellwood Resident at 556 Bellwood z. Resident at 539 Bellwood 6• Mayornor Greavu closed the public hearing. E' y H 7. Coun cilrnemUer .Anderson moved to authorise the construction o storm Burr sewer aloe the 1 4 to 20 percent slope, located east of ro posed the basis that due to the extreme f osed cul -de -sac, onStreetandther• ractical lace to route the required storm to . ra h there is no othero sewer. r - Ma or Greavu, Councilmembers Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes V Juker and Rossl)ach . Anderson, Na -- Councilmember N- Istian . 10/24 6 Attachment 4 1 8. Councilmember Anderson moved to deny the requested vai i tlt i oii.s the platting code to create a tem poran half width street -Ind n tei» )c r ry cul.-- de_S1gC in excess of 1,000 fleet of len th oli the basis t int a. Approval would adversely affect the spirit of the subdivision code and the comprehensive plan , because Public saf. ety' s ability to provide timely emergency vehicle service (--oul d be hampered or jeopardized . b. A full - width, through street is a reasonable alternative. n This alternative was planned for by the City when approval di -ion to the north and thewasgrantedfortheT in Oaks Ad t_ Markf ort Addition to the west . c. Approval is not essential to the reasonable development of this subdivision d. Council has required full -- width, through streets to lie gllaranteed across adjoining properties (as ii Condit ioll of approval for other similar proposals. Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson , Juker and Rosst.)C1C 1 hay - Councilmember Bastian. 9. Mayor Greavu moved to approve the ` orgerson Addition pr lirnin iry lat, sub 'ect to satisf action of the. f ollowin conditions bef ore a pl i -- cation for final plat approval a. The City signing a contracts) to construct the downstream drainage improvements to outlet this and a joining propert} to Round Lake.. The City Engineer may approve a phased develop- ment plan, provided the applicant can demonstrate that on -site podding capacity will be adequate to maintain predevelopment storm water flows from this site. Any lot or street area not included in the initial phase shall be platted as an outlot. until adequate storm water capacity i s provided . The ent- i re right -of -way for Burr Street and Ripley Avenue shall be plat. Led and constructed with the first phase. 1). C.i t.y or -,1ppl icarit acqui.si.ti.on of the_ 35 by 163± foot parcel needed to construct Ripley Avenue as a full - -width Street , through to Desoto Street . If a City project , the appl _icr3nt shall pay the cost of the feasibility study and all other City expenses to acquire this right-- of -wav, including attorney's fees . c. Substitute a drainage easement for Outlot B. The property lines for the adjoining lots shall be extended through the easement to the south or east boundaries of the site. The easement shall include all area that would be up to. one foot above the approved 100 -year storm design elevation for this pond . This easement shall also 1 ine up w i. th tI, cx i st i n; drainage easement on the properties to the east. 7 10/214 1. d . Outlot A shall be combined t; i th an cad jaceIlt. property. A deed stall be in the possession of the ad,)O1 n i ng proper t y owner before the plat is signed by the City. The deed. to transfer ownership of this outlot shall stipulate that this property is to be combined with adjoining property to form one parcel , to be described by one property Uix description number. e. The following street names shall be shown: 1) The north half of the existing Ripley Avenue right- of-way shall be shown between the west line of Bradley Avenue and the east boundary of the site. 2) "Ripley Avenue" shall be shown west of the south extension of the west line of proposed Lot one, Block One, 3) The remainder of the through street shall be named Burr Street ". t 4) The cul -de -sac shall be named "Summer Court ". f. Reduce the width of Lots One, Five and Six, lil m l; 'I%., , to the minimum permitted to maximize. the rear yard area for Lots Three and Four g. City Engineer approval of final grading, drainage, utility lan These plans shall include, butanderosioncontrolsP not be limited to: 1) Identification of the trees to be saved. These trees shall also be identified on the site. py 2) Revision of the grading plan and /or install storm sewer along the north boundary of the site t-o insure that drainage from this site does not flow into the properties to the north. 3) Where possible to obtain grading easements on adjoin- ing property, make a more gentle transition along the site boundary to the lots adjoining to the north and northeast. r 4) Provide surve}• evidence that Ripley Avenue will line existing ectupwithRileAvenue , west of DeSoto St r . 1 r, h. Submission of signed developer's agreement an(] surety f or all required public improvements, including but not limited to: a full -width street through to DeSoto Street and on- site utility and drainage improvements; any required tree planting; erosion control measures; relocation of the NSP r utility pole that will be within the new Ripley Avenue right -of -way, and, relocation of the driveway for 1822 DeSoto Street to Ripley Avenue. i Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers s Anderson, Juker and Rossbach . 8 Nay -- CotInC .i I (11t'flll)('I' Bast. I X n. t 10/24 Kenneth Roberts Re: Preliminary Plat City of Maplewood Torge.rson Subdivision 1830 E. Co. Rd. B Desota & Ripley Sts. Maplewood, MN 55117 Dear. Mr. Roberts, The above mentioned preliminary plat was approved by the City of Maplewood in October of 1988. Per your letter, it is necessary that I request a 1 year extension and I am requesting this .for the .following reasons in addition to other extenuating circumstances: 1 I have been delayed because of the uncert.ai.nty on the storm sewer problem. The staff has indicated they would like more answers to the question prior to me proceeding with my project. 2. I have had difficulty in negotiating the right of way for Ripley at Desota street. I recently hired a fee appraiser to assist me in negotiating or condemnation proceedings. T.he staff is well aware of the problem in dealing with the owners to the south of my property. Based on but not limited to the two major :pr. ob lems cited above, I am asking your of: f ice and the count' i l t.o J),rallc Iny request. Sincerely, Don Torgerson 9 Attach,iien l 5 mMCS { TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/OWNER. PROJECT. DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM E - Action by Colancil., City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner F-indorsed Time Extension—conditional. Use-Permit Modif,ied..... 2696 Hazelwood Avenue Health East Rejected DatHazelRidgePlannedUnitDevelopment e October 16, 1989 00060 The applicant is requesting a time extension for the conditional Use permit that authorizes the Hazel Ridge planned unit development of community-service uses, offices and the Hazel Ridge Seniors' Residence. BACKGROUND on. August 7, 1980, Council approv ed the use of the former Hazelwood School for community service programs, 'including home health care, community education, chemical dependency and family counseling and day care. In 1985, Council expanded the 1980 permit to include the Hazel Ridge Seniors' Residence. A one-year time extension was granted in May, 1986. A two-year time extension was granted on September 28, 198.70 DISCUSSION Hazel Ridge is now at 840 occupancy. According to the conditions of approval additional parking may be required if, when at '950 occupancy, parking proves to be inadequate. A one-year renewal would, therefore, be appropriate. There is no problem at this time. RECOMMENDATION Approve a one-year time extension for the Hazel Ridge planned unit development, subject to the original May 13,, 1985 conditions of approval. kd Attachments 1.0 Location Map 2* Hazel Ridge PUD LOCATION MAP z NAttachmentOne i l +1 wry: ',• ; ,,, , i'"" r, ' ...• , ! ltd . i t I r r f ! 1. HAZEL RIDGE PUD Attachment Two 3 N 4 N TO FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM Endorsed 14odiified. . Rejected...., City Manager Date Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal Highway 61 between Beam Avenue and County Road D F. M. Frattalone Excavating, Inc. Conway Rosell, Frank Frattalone, Gerald Mogren and Robert Mogren Mineral Extraction October 16, 1989 SUMMARY The applicant is requesting renewal of a conditional use permit for mineral extraction. The permit was granted in 1982, renewed for five years on July 25, 1983, and renewed again. for one year on October 10, 1988, subject to compliance with the original conditions. (See page 4.) CODE REQUIREMENTS Subsection 36 -407 states that approval of a conditional use permit under this article shall be for a period not to exceed five years and shall be renewable for a three -year period thereafter. An overall plan for mineral extraction will be reviewed by the City Council. Implementation of the overall plan shall be by means of renewable annual mineral extraction permits. Subsection 36- 442(e) requires that all conditional use permits be reviewed by Council. one year from the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by Council decision or ordinance. At the one year review, Council may specify an indefinite term or a specific term, not to exceed five years, for subsequent reviews. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use permit for mineral extraction north and northwest.of Gulden's Restaurant, west of Highway 61, for one year, subject to compliance with the original conditions and Obtaining an annual permit from the City Engineer. kd Attachments 1. Location Map 2, Property Line /Zoning Map 30 6 -28 -82 Conditions of Approval 1 1 94 VAUNAIS HEIGHTS WH i r- o w - 0 J BEAM AAN CT. Ln cr Koh 1q; on / l 0 Lake j % 1- I)fN KOHL MAN AVE ti COUNTY R 0 A D C J IN Z JD 41 D J W V1 i 0 l' a w - tJ w Vl: cr tn BR00K AVE 2 1 cb cr a cr w Q L7 1 m 11 SE. T - N 01 G E R VA i S AV E. G ANDYIE AVE L KING !7D R YJ SHE RRE N AVE - -- - r I L 0 P E J l___ _ 'AVE Xe ller - L A R K AVE ' n L ARK O k e , Z 5, B O U N T Y ___ -___ J LU R I E R D u R t 0 ° LELAN `_L'" 't` 25 IAND LOCATION MAP 2 Attachment 1 PROPERTY LINE"/ ZONING. MAP 3 ALtachinenl. 2 4 N o A. Adherence to the requirements and s ,_andards set forth in Section 917 Mineral Extraction) of the City Code. Be County Road D or Highway 61 be used exclusively for access to the subject site. C. In accordance with Section 917.060 (4), annual mineral extraction permits must be obtained from the City Engineer. A plan for each year's operation shall be approved by the City Engineer. Annual permits shall designate the area, total acreage to be excavated, quantity of material to be removed, and specific ..erosion control measures. D. All excavation'shall.be in accordance with each year's approved plan. No deviations shall be allowed without prior approval from the City Eng inee r . E o ! ° `' E. There shall be no explosive detonations of any kind on the site. z F: A suitable structure or method of operation must be employed to remove excess 'dirt -f ram truck bodies and ' tires rior to exitin onto a publicPgP right-of-way.,-- roves G. A variance: be granted allowing operation beyond.the 30 -foot zone established in Section 917.070 (2 D). of City Code. If the variance is not granted, grading operations must comply with the above Code by ceasing 30 feet from property' lines. _- -- H. The permit holder is responsible' for acquiring any permits f rom other agencies. I. All grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared by Harry S. Johnson Companies, Inc., received April. 28, 19820 II.. Approval of.the.three variances on the basis that: A. The site is not adjacent to developed property with established grades. B. The owners intend to construct energy efficient earth- sheltered structures. The steeper slopes (2:1) are necessary for this type of development. C.- Erosion control techniques will be required to stablize soils during and after mining operations. 3. The following Planning Commission recommendation was given: Commissioner Kishel moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the approval of a special use permit for mineral extraction, subject to the followingK conditions: 1. Adherence to the requirements and standards set forth in Section 917 (Mineral Extraction) of the City Code. 2. County Road D or Highway 61 be used exclusively for access to the subject site. 30' In accordance with Section 917.060 (4), annual mineral extraction permits must be obtained from the Director of Public Works.. A plan for each year's 4 6/28 Attachment 3 Action, by Council &I Endorsed. MEMORANDUM il M0d.ifiec . TO: City Manager Re j ected FROM Shawn Bernier, Planning Intern. D I' _ eSUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Home Occupation LOCATION: 2683 Geranium Avenue APPLICANT: Ms. Lou Hechtel PROJECT: Ceramics Classes DATE: October 9, 1989 S U14MARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting renewal of the conditional use p ermittogiveceramicclassesinherhomethreeorfourdaysaweek. Refer to letter on page 7.) Classes are held Monday afternoon and evenings, Wednesday evening, and Saturday afternoon. BACKGROUND On January 25, 1988, the City Council approved this home occupation for one year subs ect : to compliance with section 36 .66(4 ) of the City Code and all fire safety requirements ORDINANCE PROVISIONS Subsection 3 6 -442 (3) . All conditional use permits shall be reviewed by the Council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by Council decision or ordinance. At the one -year review, the Council may specif y an indefinite term or specific term, not to exceed five (5) years, for subsequent reviews. DISCUSSION The applicant.is in compliance with the conditions of approval. Staff is not aware of any problems with this home occupation. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use permit for the home occupation at 2683 Geranium Avenue for ceramic classes for five years subject to the original conditions of approval. Attachments: l. Location Map 2 Property Line /Zoning Map SBHOMEOCC 1 R R2) t PUD) R r"" ' ._.._._ .f' • i t V iAKE RD R 3 a a. ipu v R3 „/ r y,.• F- R,3 C F:•A24 I. \ Z R2 •t-• R3 PUZ) MaHrt.A'v0 R (PU0 R P c F E3 ;• , 4 , R t "t) 1 8c(V) CHI R R •A,T + AVE CF R r: F F • :. 1 •I , 8c R R w R 3 • R `R ; M i M1` W* A-V LA R 8c M2 M2 G MATC N L I NE LOCATION MAP ' Attachment 1 Q N 0, j D o 07 A T5 Am J3 146 4 t" To cc if U00 AVE as A-on 1 a, ZC63?. .52 k A R Y L A N too 69) co qqr 01 CA, C41 4 et, 19 -34: jc>0 Up r2657 1-7 L.-F A0644• zo04• -11 4s 21 0 dot ni . , • K ~', ,,' 1,00/ C la QG) 119 212F p; In cc VIA 6 ti to 03 A r N, ( -- 74 fn Cj 46 3a) • \ cb. `, \° dft :04) C) IL 69 c.. law 01 C+ 2) lop g # A& (44) JF PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP Attachmetit 2 JV rn lb mwbmWW 49.5 3 3 7 dw of too OMP 269 14 2683 s f. mop t 1 .9ol 100 L A. A,, la QG) 119 212F p; In cc VIA 6 ti to 03 A r N, ( -- 74 fn Cj 46 3a) • \ cb. `, \° dft :04) C) IL 69 c.. law 01 C+ 2) lop g # A& (44) JF PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP Attachmetit 2 AGENDA I TEM - 7 AGENDA REPORT TOz City 'Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Brooks Avenue Water Main, Project 88-08 Change Order One DATE z October 16, 1989 Action by Council:. Endorsed Mod if ied. Rejected Date Introduction Attached is proposed Change Order One for the subject project in the amount of $1,175. Attached is a resolution to authorize the change order, Back c-iround During construction, the property owner on the north side of the street finally agreed to provide'ten feet of right-o*+-way to mak-e Up the standard 60 foot right-of-way. There were two dead trees in this dedicated right-o+-way. The property owner requested that the trees be removed as part of the project. The complete removal of these dead tress also eliminates potential city liability.. The trees were removed for a total of $5008 The, remaining items were existing sanitary sewer service and manhole frame repair. They were damaged through no fault of the contractor. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. BA I is Attachments RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Counc i 1 of Map] ewood , Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 88-0.8 and has let a Iconstruction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 , and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be mod i. f ied! and designated as Improvement Project 8E3- 08, Change Order One, NOW , T -H BEFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAC' LEWDOD , :MINNESOTA. that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by ex editing said Change Order One in the amount of $1,175. CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAPLEWOOD 9 M I NNESOTA Project Name: Brooks Avenue Water Main. - Change Order No.: I Project No.: Se-08 Date: 10-16-89 Contractor: Meyer Contracting The following changes shall be made in the contract documents: Unit Description Unit Quanti t Y Price Total Tree Removal from Right - EAn 2 250 500 Sanitary Sewer Service Repair Adjcast Sanitary Sewer Manhole Total Contract Status Original - Contract: Net Change of Prior Change Order No. to No. Change This Change Order: Revised Contract: Approved. Approved Agreed to by Contractor by A Its /I _01f _V EA a . 2 275 550 EA • 1 125 125 so 1,9175 Time Cost 31,996o52 Mayor En in r Titl e 0800 1 1175s00 33.171 •52 MEMORANDUM Z- Action by Counoii'.14 E. ndorsed... Modif ied R e j ecte Date... io - L, To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recrea Sub i Oo Payment of Parking Area 'in Pleasantview Park Date ,e October 9, 1989 Introduction it is requested that the City Council approve the payment of 3,936,62 for the city's share of the construction of a parking lot at Plea,santview Park with funds provided from the PAC Neighborhood Fund, Background During the discussion of the Maplewood Highlands development 6. sout.h of Pleasantview Park, the contractor was in need of a cul- de-sac at a street adjacent to Pleasantview Park, During the developer's agreement proceedings, we discussed the need for access to the park, and parking that could be prov ided by the cul-de-sac. It was agreed that we would permit a cul-de-sac partially on park. property, and in exchange the developer would fill, grade, and construct eleven parking spaces for the park and extend a trail from the parking lot to the present trail in Pleasantview Park. Park funds would be used to pay for curb construction and the asphalt for the eleven parking spaces. Recommendation it 'i's requested that the Maplewood City Council authorize the transfer of $3,,936.62 from the Highwood Neighborhood PAC Fund for the payment of a parking facility in Pleasantview Park, c: Lu Aurelius MAGENDAITE 6' 9 Action by CounoU-s MEMORANDUM 4 TO City Manager Endorsed,.., Iff-odif iled.. FROM: Public Works Coordinator Re* ected...... Date SUBJECT a inal Payment--Painting o+ Interior o+ Cope Avenue ........ a---No. Water Tank 0DATEN October 16, 1989 Rainbow, Inc. has success+ully completed the painting o+ the interior o+ the Cope Avenue water tank in accordance with the speci+ ications. An appl ication +or + in al payment, together with lien waivers, has been received. On August 14, 1989, the council approved Change Order 1 in the amount o+ $5,935. This amount should have been $7,567 (see attached letter and change order) . The di++erence ($1,632) is shown on the application +or +inal payment is shown as Change Order 2. Original Budget Amount Original Contract Amount Change Order I Change Order 2 Final Contract Amount Pr eviOLAS Payments Final Payment Amount 110100ON00 E32 10 10 a 00 51935uOO 1_ -9 532 s.00 89,577xOO 41a475n60 481101n40 Approval o+ Change Order 2 and +inal payment in the amount o+ 48,101.40 is recommended. WCC is Attachment 511 Eleventh Avenue SouthAECENGINEERS4DESIGNERSMinneapolis, Minnesota 55415 CHANGE ORCER, No. Orze Corx, Avenue 612/332-8905 DATE OF ISSUANCE: Juty 24, 79891 OUIVFER-'S PROJECT NO. 5008-4-13 - 22 (, 6oweAey) ENGINE-ER: AEC E0'iqinRAa.-,-t,6 & 511 -.-- flt -i--Avenue South 5 415 COVFRACT FOR: ENGINEER ' S PROJIET T Nj. 500-6- 6- 13 Hyd,-wpU vou a*Lk,.. d't %i!C'{...:tad- to nulee, -t'-Ze 'i ot-C.VG/.Y q chanc4e,6 -in the, DE- .mot R-- Lr' PT'r0N,, jrl, I - JL 6 , I16%, D--v Waze, to a SP- 01, cuzd appe j t,,4D wat-6 Kopr,)er,s Ht-Gucod Epox y at 8. 0 fr . L OF CHANGE OFEF-R: ker-u-t,,i- artd co- Aeptace coat,rtq. AT T,40 F-:NT-S: (L-. t di.-,)cwrP-.rzt,6 , Ljppo4;Unq changp tette,-pt dated Juey 1989. I.te,1n.6 one & CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TICS 0,74c xi;b-%ac T-,nr-- Corz'vLlct P'q'ice -)tnaZ CL C),"-/- doute- PAev-i.ou.-' C$Iat -ge 0,--zu.te-#, No. 0 to No. 0 Net. rJAirt a. 41tom pttev tge c),,ot(je PAJ-0,1 to - ,,A, Change T te See, corzt, -O'C t' Net -4j Ckwy-Lqe, (),qj Net jj5 0 7/ app.,ft-ove-ki cilang-ea T-,n-e, ot date PRECO Jok-zn R. FIt P.E. APPROVED: AF'PR(-X/(---Tj: by by bq C Branch Office: 13807 Village Mill Drive • Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • 804/379-3944 if V;t { RAIN90'W INC. 7324 - 36th avenue north minneapolis, minnesota 55427 612) 535-4041 ED Commercial & Industrial Painting Contractors July 20 1989 SUL 2 A 1989 AEC Engineers & Designers 511 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 A'r*rENT I ON -:—Jack Kollmer RE: Maplewood 1*5 MMG HUdropiller Dear Jack: Rainbow, Inc. proposes to supply all labor, material and equipment to sandblast and coat miscellaneous areas as prescribed below. Item 1 Dry Well Tube Sandblast SP-6 Commercial Blast 1st coat Koppers Hi gaurd at 4-6 Mils Oft 2nd coat Koppers Hi gaurd at 4-6 Mils Oft Lump Sum: $1,323.00 Note: Safety belt rail will be removed and re-installed so as not to damage slide. Item 2 Grinding and Caulking of Dry Well Tube Lump Sum: $19612e00 Item 3 Re-caulking of StifFner Rings Approximately 20 hours of time required, Lump Sum: $740 a 00. Item Lt Equipment.Set-Up and Venting Lump Sum: $832*00 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, 75 6 74 RAINBOW, INC, Mike DeBuhr Project Manager MO/cs 511 Eleventh Avenue*SouthAECENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332-8905 REVISED APPLICATION NO. T;-PEE 13 11 / FINAL PAV NT TO C- o Map- cod, K' ta.. ContAac,t 4o.,v Intz.,i-&4ot Cteacninq, Re q & Pa,i&tjnq o,6 1.5 *,G &P-evated (Akite.& TanJ2. Cope Avenue- Tourt A 7 f Nd. 5008- ENGINEEWSS ----P)tbject, Fo,,t Ckb.,-da azcoffP '_.-- -vwuok'L ;d-w, d-o o,60- Aug..,vA 1, 1989 TotaZ ContAact changtra, o-.tde..tt,-L) 89,577.00 89,577.00 GRoSS AT DF T W 89,577.00 RaWbow, nom.. LESS PREY PAYPENTS 41P47/5-60 I ICAION 48v101.4THISAPFT 0Invo.,ce No. 27115R MOUNT WC Invo-ice Dated Branch Office: 13807 Village Mill Drive • Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • 804/379-3944 CONTRACTOR'S Schedu-&, o-6 VaL.,Le Ubfdz Coffpteted Item urzi;t P', Arrount Quan Arwun. it I • St tL Repae&*G6 and NIA 4o270.00 100.0 -a 4.9 270. 00 Repu,A o ew_,ction _w r NIA 340.00 1 100. 0,06- 11 840.00 ma,-*d2.,6 & 3. I 4arzdjDia,,Wwatinq j NIA 769600.06 100.0%, 76 600.00 4. ExtaP&joT 4anctbta,4t/,6q. .6t. N/A 300.00 100. 0% 300.00 82.9010.00 82,010.00 To- O..?t"Umz rttqact 5. Ckangje, O.,Ptde.,*L No. I NIA Repa,,A & Repatce, Coatin9 5,935.00 100. 0-0011, 5,935.0. G. Change OAdzt No. NIA 11632.00 100.0%, 1,632.00 Repay Ic;c,,> Epoxy cauba. TotaZ ContAact changtra, o-.tde..tt,-L) 89,577.00 89,577.00 GRoSS AT DF T W 89,577.00 RaWbow, nom.. LESS PREY PAYPENTS 41P47/5-60 I ICAION 48v101.4THISAPFT 0Invo.,ce No. 27115R MOUNT WC Invo-ice Dated Branch Office: 13807 Village Mill Drive • Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • 804/379-3944 Ac-1-1-on by Ccuncilo ed3f Rejected—, AGENDA REPORT Date TO: City Manager FROM: Staff Services Coordinator a RE: BUDGET TRANSFER - LEGAL DATE: October 16, 1989 INTRODUCTION A budget transfer off$ 26,480 is requested for legal expenditures. BACKGROUND The latest estimate of 1989 legal expenditures of $125,850 as Outlined in the 1990 proposed budget exceeds the initial 1989 budgeted amount of $99,370. The requested budget transfer will bring the 1989 budget in line with the projected reestimate. RECOMMENDATION Approval of a budget transfer of $26,480 from the Contingency Account to Account 101 - 103 -4480. GJB: kaz AGENDA ITEM Action by Council:i AGENDA REPORT Endo.T;,sed Modif ied. TO: City Manager Re -i ected FROM: Assistant City Engineer Date. SUBJECT: Bowl awn Avenue, T.H. 49 to Jackson Street, Project 87- 0 -- -P'ub l i s Hearing/Approve Plans DATE: October 12, 19:89 Introducti--on The -publ is hearing mail ing I ist for the subject project is herewith transmitted. Attached is a resolution t.o order the prof ect by execution of a cooperative agreement with Ramsey Count-y. Resoluti ons approving the street .and bridge construction plans,, which are presented for review and approval, are also attached Background rwrrrrrrrnn A copy of the September 19, 1989 agenda report is attached for reference. Recommendation It is recommended that the proposed improvements be approved by adopting the attached resolutions. ESA iw Attachments 6, TO FROM toSUBJECTS DATE: AGENDA ITEM -T - AGENDA REPORT City Manager Assistant City Engineer Roselawn Avenue ,9 . TeHm 49 to Jackson Street Project 87-01, Schedule Public Hearing September 19 ,1 1989 Introduction Action by Council: Endorsed Modified Rej ected Date A copy of the f easibil ity report (design memorandum) prepared by the consultant engineer retained by Ramsey County for this project is attached. This agenda report represents proposed financing of the city's share of the estimated project costs. A resolution to schedule a pub ]-i-c hearing is attacheds Background The consultant engineer was given authorization by Ramsey County to.prepare a quite detailed set of preliminary plans, which are currently available for review. By the proposed date of the publ is hearingj a f inal set of pl ans, shoul d be avail abl e for approval. The proposed improvements include a 40-foot wide bituminous roadwayoadway with concrete curb and gutter and bridge replacements No sidewalk is proposed at this time. However, the proposed bridge wool d be bui I t to accommodate a 44-+ oot w i de street p I Lis a side Wal k an the north side-. The boul evard wool d be graded to accommodate a future f ive-f oot wide concrete sidewal k It. is P P osed to sign and stripe the roadway as no parking on either with a 12 foot lane in each direction and an eight -foot wide 0der an each side. The provision of a striped no parkingshou % shoul der wil I al *1 ow for reasonabl e bicycl e and pedestrian use of the roadway at this times It is proposed to extend a 12 inch water I ine from the Little Canada feeder main just east of the Soo Line tracks to Rice Street. Services would be provided as requested, or as apparently needed for future developments At this time ,9 the issues that are not satisfactorily resolved a involve the slope easement on the water utility property necessary to widen the road and raise the grade on the road (f or c earance over the Soo Line tracks.) . A section of modular precast concrete block retaining wal I is proposed to maintain the spent I ime sl udge I agoon entrance drive and al I ow a screening tree planting areas An agreement with the water util ity has not Project :87-01 2 September 19 ,9 '1989 been reached roncernii-nig acquisition of.right-of -way and/or slope easements -and replacemennt a)+ trees that must be -removed for the. S I op easement and retain i ng al I it, The cost est i mates do not Include costs -for tree planting or a sign* I cant amount for right-o-f-way acqu2'sit.idn.. If the water utility refuses to provide trees in the planting area on top of the proposed retain in g . wal I i or reel acement trees in the slope f i 1, 1, areas,, then 4 significant addition in project costs would be necessary Staff members of the water Utility have indicated that they perceive the existing trees on Rosel awn as an adequate screen f or the ent 3. me Ss,p I ludge, lagoonsiD In the event that tree p) ant Ing costs are added to the project,, Map lewDod would pay ,75 per-cent of these costs according to Ramsey purchase County cost 'part2cipation pol icys If it is necessary to p or condemn right-o+-way then Maplewood incurs all costs according to Ramsey County cost participation pol icy. If the issue is c:ircumvented by the construction of add itional. retaining wal I voith ve-hicl e and pedestrian barriers, then -Mapl ewood wool d al so Pay 75 percent of the additional costs 4l The potential -for increasing the project cost due to these issues does . not affect proposed assessments. A summary of proposed assessments is attached. Proposed . assessments are based on standar%d policya Residential properties would be assessed $1125 and $500 each lot for street and storm sewers respectivelys Commercial and other nion-RL or RM properties would be assessed at S1.5 /front foot, and $0.10/square foot for street and storm sewer, e 41 'Water main assessment is proposed at $30 per front respect iv I y foots The p roposed water main assessment would recover the projected costs of extension of trunk water main to Rice Streets The costs of water and sewer service stubs woul d be f ul I y Irecovered through assessments to the benefited property* A summary of current estimated- costs and local share + inane inci is given an the following tablie: ESTIMATED CITY COSTS AND PROPOSED FINANCING Project Assessment MSA Off System Gen .Oblig. cost* Recovery Financ ing Financing Street $3009700 659000 .$2359700 5,9 000 480W $104, . C) oo Storm Sewer 15,9000 Water Main 491000 499000 Service Stubs 22 22.000 two Total $386,700 $141,000 $235,700 $109000 Project cost is estimated construction cost with 25 percent t" for engineering and administra 2 on (18 percent Ramsey County and seven percent Maplewood)* Project 87-01 3 September, 19, 1989 Recommend at ion it is rsecommended that the council adopt the attached resoI Ut icon that sets a public hearing. for this project BSA I Jc Attachments RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREASj the c'Ity, envineer for the City Of Maplewood has been authbri.zed acidd dir.ected to prepare a report with reference to th I e improvement a+ Rosellawn Avenue from Rice Street: (T.H. 49) to Jackson Street, City Proiect 87-01.,, by construction of roadway with concrete curb and utter,, bridgeg storm sewer, water mains 9 and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared. the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW THEREFORE41 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD41 MINNESOTAj as +01lows: The report © the rity engineer advising this council that . the pr The improvement on Rosel awn: Avenue from Rice Street T.H. 49) to Jackson Street., City Project 87-01, by construction of roadway with concrete curb, and gutter, bridgeq storm sewerg feasible and should best be water main, and appurtenances, is made as proposed, is hereby received& 2., The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in waccordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improveme nt cost of the according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total improvement of $9709000:8 3a A pubic hearing will . be held in the council chambers A. P i of the I city ha l I at 1830 East County Road B on Monday the 23rd day of October,, 19E39,1 at 7 p.m. to consider said improvements The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said ed by laws hearing and improvement as requir STATE OF MINNESOTA DE, , THEN T OF TRANS P ©RT T I ON AND COUNTY OF" RAMSEY' IDEPARTHENT OF A)BLIC VORKS for Roselawn Avenue (CSAH 26) from Rice Street to .45 mile east of Rice Street in Maplewood Improvementent _ Replace Bridge 6629 over Pr opo s p Soo Line Railroad Track; reconstruct: Ros a lawn Avenue between Rice Street and .45 mile east of Rice Street a State Projects S.P. 62- 626 -03, M.S.A.P, 138- 020 -06 St 062MinnesotaProject: BROS 9 t 1 DM21802 I Hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the lays of the State of Minnesota. ^ Marvin L. Sorvals Date:... 2.. - 'L4 aw 9 1 Reg. No, 13380 DESIGN, MEMORANDUM TABLE OF CONTENTS am TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION DES CRIPTION OF 'EXISTING FACILITY DESCRIP'l1u" uk PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT STAGING ESTIMATED COSTS & FUNDING SOURCES ALTERNATE CONSTRUCTION OPT IOT' S - ROAD CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS - BRIDGE ALTERNATE . . ADVANTAGESGES DISADVANTAGES, RECOMMENDATIONS ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Project Plan and Profile Map T ical Section - Road Figure 2 - Proposed YP edFigure3 - Propos Typical Section - Bridge Page 1 . DM21s02 Page No 1. 2. 2. 2. 4. 8. 8. 10, 10 11. 11. DESIGN MEMORANDUM AVENUE FROM RICE STREET TO .45 MILE-EAST OF RICE STREET ROEELAWN COUNTY OF RAMSEY INTRODUCTION This Design Memorandum for Roselawn Avenue from Rice Street (T . H 49) to has been prepared and submitted in accordance 45 mile en t of Rice. Street P P WI*Eh the approved Highway Development Process by Ramsey County PublicProject Works Department . PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Tie proposed project is Roselawn Avenue (CSAH 26) from Rice Street (T-H,, 49) to .45 mile east of Rice Street. The project is located in the City of 8Maplewoodandis45mileinlength. The location is illustrated in Figure 1, ProJect-Plan & Profile Map. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITY Roselawn Avenue is currentl y a two lane , 30 f oot wide , undivided road . although the width does not provide Parking is not prohibited on the road, al g sufficient space for parking onkin the paved surface* The surface of the road is or bicyclebituminous. There are no pedestrian facilities along the road. y 20 feet. The 1987 average daily night -of -way width varies from 63 to 1 traffic tADT count on Roselawn Avenue from Rice Street to Jackson Street was 3300, The projected ADT for 2007 is 5300. Heavy commercial vehicles are Page 2 . DM21802 r seven - percent of the current ADT. Traffic counts were conducted by Ramsey County Pub 1 is Works Department. Bridge Has £629, located 0.2 mile east of Rice Street, Was reconstructed in 3.96 and carries traffic on Roselawn Avenue over a Soo Line Railroad Companyan track. It consists of seven steel beam spans supported on a timber structure on a 20 degree skew. Deck width (out to out) is 31.2 feet and length is 3.23.5 feet. There are no sidewalk provisions on the bridge. The vrtile cal clearance between the track and the. underside of the bridge is 23 feet.. Soo Line officials have indicated this track vill continue to be used. the poor condition of the steel beams of the bridge, a maximum five Due to p l - ton gross load restriction is currently in effect. Truck and bus traffic must us:e alternate routes between Rice Street and 1 -35E. The posted speed limit on .Roselawn Avenue is 30 miles per hour. The terrain is rolling. Land use adjacent to Roselawn Avenue is St. Paul Water pUtility, Soo Line Railroad Company, commercial areas at the intersection of Roselavn !Avenue at Rice Street and single family residences east of the bridge. The p p rinci al land owner along the segment, St. Paul Water Utility, has a treatment plant on the south side of Roselawn Avenue. Lime sludge from the water treatment operation is pumped to an area north of Roselawn Avenue to stillin g basins. A service road used by trucks and equipment extracting lime from the stilling basins is adjacent to and parallel with Roselawn Avenue. Figure l) 4 on the south side of Roselavn Avenue, a massive earth reinforced concrete grater reservoir is , located adjacent to Roselawn Avenue. Two major water es 90 inch conduits) ass beneath Roselawn Avenue at approximate supply lines P right angles just east of the existing bridge. Page 3 . 3?M21SO2 6,.5 feet wide. (Figure 2) side slopes wary from 3 borizontal to 1 vertical in most areas, to 2.5 t tal to 1 vertical in areas of large fills. Boulevard slopes are at hOr ZOn Page 4 . DH218 02 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT The existing bridge No. 6629e on Roselawn Avenue east of Rice Street will1 ew, three span structure (No. 62559) to continue the grade be .replaced with a p separat:.ion beeen the railroad track and Roselawn Avenue. The length of the a.tel 360 feet and the roadway width is 44 feet. A 6 foot bridge is, approximately wi de sidewalk will be constructed on the north side. A type J concrete rail pipe railing will be constructed on the south side. A ra ii sng and s two p g . and pipe railing will be constructed on the north side of the concretet:e parapet a P p g bridge- .. 'F.i g,1Lre A The superstructure of the bridge will consist of 36 inch prestressed con - crete beams and a 9 inch thick reinforced concrete deck. The structural ca- pac ity will Vertical clearance under the bridge will be 23 feet ssinlmum and borizo ntai clearance from the centerline of track will be 25 feet to eliminatemate the 'need for crash walls on the piers. close proximity of the two 90 inch St. Paul water conduits, Due to the p a sugered piles will be used to minimize disturbance to these conduits. The e s will be 14 inch diameter, concrete filled piles approximately 60 feet pil ep designed for 60 ton capa city. he bridge will be 40 feet wide, with a 12 f oot The road east and west of t g s Wide travel lane a six foot wide reaction lane and B624 concrete curb an gutter. The boulevard on the north side will be 13 feet wide. This provides fora 6.5 foot grassy area behind the curb a .future 5 foot concrete sidewalk to for rounding*. The south boulevard will be grass and and 1.5 feet at the p g 6,.5 feet wide. (Figure 2) side slopes wary from 3 borizontal to 1 vertical in most areas, to 2.5 t tal to 1 vertical in areas of large fills. Boulevard slopes are at hOr ZOn Page 4 . DH218 02 The pavement section will be percent towards the new curb and gutter . T P with the centerline elevation being 0.48 feet higher than parabolic 3n shape elevation on each side. A minimum of two feet will be provided the gutter e rb and fixed obstructions such as utility poles, road between the face of cu _ Signs, nr faire hydrants* selaun avenue approaches R ice Street, it will be widened to accom- As Ro le turning right. At the Rice Street intersection, Roselawn modate vehi of two 12 foot wide travel lanes, one ii*11 be 46 feet wide, consisting Avenue a .• lane on the north side of Roselawn Avenue, a six foot 12 foot vide right turn t io n space on .the south sidede of Roselawn Avenue and two foot wide VI reaction P be at 15 to 1 and Is iae Of the road. The taper ws. run from gutters on each sX11 . 0 to 3 +00• Thirty -flve foot radii will tie into existing curb on station 2+10 f Rice Street. An existing chain link fences located on the the east side o selawn at Rice Street, will be removed from the public right south side of Ro of w ay and placed on private property* is Jackson Street Permanent con - The eastern terminus of the project, and 300 feet east of Beaumont 11 occur between Rice Street n structlon vi oin -t, Roselawn will taper fr om 40 feet wide to the exist - Street. from this p be n Street, Bituminous curb will e 3ng 34 foot v idth at the west side of Jackso Zed in this temporary .section to better convey surface runoff* utilized of 2 feet higher than The design grade for Roselawn Avenue is an average 3.5 feet higher at the bridge. This raise will help flatten out existing and d e and is necessary at the br g driveway grades at the east end of the project railroad to insure proper clearancmen s e. Grades match existing pave over the 8t .both Rice Street and Jackson Street. DM21802 Page 5 . 0 i m arking will be prohibited on the south side of Roselawn Avenue between Rice Street and Beaumont Street. On the north side of Roselawn Avenue parking will. he .prohibited from Rice Street to approximately 300 feet east of Beaumont Street .the eastern term ,u.s of the project. costly iti a t,on of dag;e s, assure the structural integrity of To, avoid cos y g concrete water reservoir, and provide adequate boulevard the earth reinforced Vldths the road centerline will be shifted six feet to the north between sta- tans 7 0 and 16 +00 to 20 +00. This will result in the need to con 7+00 to 11 + 0 typeakeys 8strukeystoneoretainin wall along the south side of the sludge basin PPserviceroad. 'The mall will be approximately 270 feet long and average 10 feet in he -fi ght. Placement will 'be at 45 feet north of the street centerline, or S feet mouth of the service road. This will result in a 12 foot wide flat propertyareanorthofthe line where -trees are proposed to be planted. The new tree line will replace the trees lost due to construction and act as a screen for th e line sludge basins. Discussions with St. Paul Water Utility g are necessary to work out funding of these improvements. The proposed center- lane of construction will =catch the existing centerline at the Rice Street Intersection and in the temporary construction portion at the project's east- t erly terminus. middle of the Because of the road shift at the mid project, six feet of addi- x right-of-way will need to be acquired along the north side of Rose awn lt3ona rig y Avenue* The property. located between Soo Line Railroad and Beaumont Street, s a is owned by St. Paul Water Utility. Page 6 . DM21802 The design section for Roselawn Avenue will consist of 1.5 inches of 2341 bituminous wearing course, Zinches of 2331 bituminous binder course, . modified 3.5 riches of 233.1 bituminous base courseqcourse 7 inches. of Class, 5 aggregate base, w. Granular borrow varies from 6 and a variable depth of select granular borrow. a to 4 . 5 f ee t at the Soo Line bridge* Inches : t Rice tree speed ,11 :e C miles per hour based on stopping sight distance Des 9A . 3.5 feet height of eye and 0. 5 feet height of object, The subgrade for t n design sigma V20 is 3469000* R value was determined to be 17 and the ten ton equivalent is 21 inches for Rased on these numbers,. the required granular q ih has a Roselawn. Avenue r 'The- design: sectio n detailed in the prevous paragraph i required a3ent equal t0 21.375 inche s which exceeds the grsnuiar a quiv . new lighting is proposed ou Roselawn Avenue. Existing lighting located N© n g . poles will require relocation due to on polesoles will be retained. Some s widening of the street. Rice Street is proposed by Mn/ DOT in 19909 the same time Improvement to R Avenue is scheduled. Mn /DOT plans to construct new concrete curb and Roselawn . the entire roadway gutter with 35 foot radii at Roselawn and then overlay . Storm sewer will be constructed on the west side of Rice Street with new catch It and a pipe stubbed to the ea st pick up Roselawn storm drain- to bas sns bui tin 15 inch culvert under Roselawn at Rice Street will be re- age. The axis g moved by MnjD pT and ditches filled along the east side. A traffic signal will also be installed at the intersection. i D1421802 page 7 • PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS posed as. part of the R oselawn Avenue Improvements. Storm sewer i s pro Dint at Beaumont Street. Catch Storm water flows east and west of the high p in are therefore necessary at Jackson Street, on the east side basins. asins and pip S o Line Railroad- and at Rice Street* Pipe sizes vary the S from 15 inch f the outlet on the east side of diameter ;for c -atch basin.. leads to 18 inch for l 1. s o w a 2 inch and 3 inch culvert under Roselawn will nee to the t racks be extended -dueue to widening of the road* xistin water main in Roselawn Avenu e consists of 12 inch pipe from east E $ 0o Line Railroad to .Jackson S treet. To facilitate future development Of the S proposes to extend 12 inch water west f the tracks, the City . of Maplewood p P the north side of Roselawn to Rice Street. The pipe will be iman along. and south at Rice to allow future connection without disruption stubbed north will be to Roselawn Avenue* water services w P rovided to businesses. PROJECT STAGING The upgrading of lto se lawn Avenue vi ll involve several stages of construc. water maing storm sewer, pavement, t ion , Since the street will receive new complete closure of the street to thru the Soo Line Railroad, cornpl and a bridge at traffic will be necessary. bituminous pavement from the The first step will be to remove the existing r main and storm sewer construction can then begin on either end. roadway • Ovate y con- Some depending on depths. S ome filling may be necessary to of the pr sever near the bridge since design grades are as much as 3.5 feet struct storm sew Higher than existing. 1 Page 8 • DM218 02 Access must be maintained at all times to individuals living at the east send o f the project 8nd to the Water Utility Purification Plant located just Trucks extractingmastofthebridge. Tr 8 lime from the sludge basins must be allayed access at all -timles. y; es have been installed, including necessary gas, tele- once all ut.i1 t . Z an. cable TV replacement, final street grading can take place. phone, 8 . P g soil f rom the boulevards is requirede of existing to Striping and stockpiling P Ciea =ing and grubbing of trees and brush within the slope limits can be Accoinplished at the same time reset is. being widened ar d raised, substantial quantities of Because the street $ Select granular borrow material will be utilized in f i11 will be necessary,* 8e 1 g the areas directly beneath the driven roadway. In the boulevards and side slopes, common borrow material (i.e. , silty sands, clayey sands) will be used* compacting of the subgrade, aggregate base ruate- After proper and complete p g ral can be placed. This would be followed by concrete curb and gutter, final grad he aggregate base, and placement of the three bituminous layers grading oft Sodding of disturbed residential boulevards: and needing all other areas arin driveways and stripping the new roadway pavement would take place. Rep g Y s ould be necessary along with placement of signs along the route. Existing gates would be re chain link fencing and vehicular g Laced in their originalP 3ocatons . 1 1 Page 9 . i 13M21802 7 i 3 i y ESTIMATED COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES ro osed: s e =st. aLed r Cost $970,000* The costs are divided as The w r ,p p ollo s: ALTERNATE CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS an ROAD An alternate construction o p tion for the road is its repair* The subgrade of the road is not adequate, there are drainage problems and the width of the road would be narrower than co unt y state .aid standards specify. Repair of the road with an overlay would be only a short -term measure to improve the pave- w rrect drains ent surface. The overlay would not co a or width deficiencies on g this section of Roselawn Avenue, For the se reasons, repair of the road has been rejected from further consideration. MM218O2 page 10. State Federal Transp or- 8ridge tation County Replace- bridge State Aid Total meet Bondin Highway Maplewood Bridge, removal, ol.00O 200000 Construct Bridge with Sid :ewal on one side 3809000 3049000 769000 construct Roadway 496,C0O 2149100 283,900 Storm Sewer 72, 00 58,000 14,000 TOTAL ..... ®..; 9.709000 3049000 769000 2929100 2979900 This estimate is basedd on federal bridge replacement funds, county state ld highway funds, state transportation fundstrap and Ramsey County's policy for cost participation. Estiumated '9 ear of construction is 1990. ALTERNATE CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS an ROAD An alternate construction o p tion for the road is its repair* The subgrade of the road is not adequate, there are drainage problems and the width of the road would be narrower than co unt y state .aid standards specify. Repair of the road with an overlay would be only a short -term measure to improve the pave- w rrect drains ent surface. The overlay would not co a or width deficiencies on g this section of Roselawn Avenue, For the se reasons, repair of the road has been rejected from further consideration. MM218O2 page 10. 3t would be possible to reconstruct Roselawn Avenue to a width other than es is not required to accommodate 40 feet A wider road, of four travel lan , anti f ate d vol a of traffic on R oselawn Avenue. A eider road to accom- the ed unnecessary. A goad 36 feet wide date k pan:, bath ZaL, des was:.. Consider sa o an ar ht foot wide parking: lane on one nth fog -t i.de tray *l lanes , g sub two ,foot wide gutters on each sidee could be constructed. This option aide oval bicycle travel as would the 40 a oui d n, of However, accommodate two directs Y ached bicycle path would require foot alternative* Construction of a det Y i n add. tion to that proposed. riet .VZ. .r, ALTERNATE CONSTRUCTION OPTIONS .= BRIDGE The • grade separation of vehicle users and trains is desirable to be main- 3. • ehabiiitatng the existing bridge is ed at this location. The option _son of z ta.n it.s the best alternative. not ct.:cal. Therefore, replacing ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Advantages of this improvement project are many. The most important will traveling public. The b foot reaction lane 1be wder safer roadway for the tra g P ether side will act as bike paths and allow cars to pull over in an emer- on c situation. The added boulevard wid th on the north will accommodate a gen of f is . The grade raise will flatten future ..fconcretesidewalk or pedestrian tr f the project. At Rice Street, the steep driveway slopes at the east end o p J out p . 11 match the. improvements proposed new curb, p avement, and right turn lane vi b o Line Railroad will be wider and cap- DM21802 Page 11. 4 4 Z 7 i a r Page 12 . DM218o2 and New concrete curb and gutter able of supporting truck and bus traffic. runoff more efficiently, thereby a lim- w.11 handle stor;a water storm sewer ati n o f ; water main to Ripe .street- will y ditches and ewale s . The extens io mng s: dev e 1 .merit in the are a 3.;d tease s p =ov de for future eeda a p ro used project are the costs of all the improve P - MI.Saadvantages Of the P P this report. Also, a substantial Estimai.ed costs are an In nert s. s number of .gees will be cleared due to .raising and widening the road. The two 4driveway entrance a to the lime sludge basins vili become steeper due to the e proposed keystone retaining wall vement, Some routine maintenance of th p p along the sludge basin service road will be necessary. outweigh the disadvantages, it Because the advantages of the project far 8 is recommede d the #provements be done as detai led in this report. The main bridge with a structurally sound in replacement of the deficient bri g reason being P ehicles . Also, the of carrying truck, bus, and firefighting v bridge capableable Roselawn is in poor condi tion and in need of adequate drainage pavement of provi.sions,. 4 4 Z 7 i a r Page 12 . DM218o2 z too e $adM two KCw COO V 3u. 033 Cr. W-wvw v w WWI I W.'% 4o* r - r ) tj 03 I M. v kmm!" F to Ste. 234 73 ROSELAWN AVENUE (CSAH No. 26 Rice St. to Jackson St. PLAN and PROFILE Donestroo Anderlik A Associates v, te: Jan. 1989 N o. CV-mm. 21802 Fia. 860 vmo Or 860 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 91 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. 19 20 21 22 23 SE 24 25 ROSELAWN AVENUE (CSAH No. 26 Rice St. to Jackson St. PLAN and PROFILE Donestroo Anderlik A Associates v, te: Jan. 1989 N o. CV-mm. 21802 Fia. ON_ A/W Esc. DEGot 0. Ommm amm, T—, I N, 3.3 Ver.-33' 6060 13# 2 12@ 2U- 1- PROFILE GRAD;D, P.G.+0.02 0.00 B-624 CONC. 3: CURB & GuTTE P.C. + 0. 2.00 P.G. -0-0 P a r 0 b o 1;.C.0 r OwFuturte conc. Ll 1/2* PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUSWO.K lyp, WEARI.NG COURSE SPEC. 2341 MOD. Y TOP 2SOIL " PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS As/ SOD OR SEED BINDER COURSE SPEC.. 2331 N PEC 0 ONO SIDE SLO C.—C'sFIC AREAS2.5:1 :N 5. - - TYPICAL SECTION SCALE: 1" =10 ROSELAWN AVENUE Rice St. to Jackson St. Street c) 3" PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE SPEC. 2331 7" AGGREGATE BASE. CL6 5 ELECT GRANULAR 70RROW VARIABLE DEPTH R/W EX.. . Irftnsonestroo, AoseneA4 Anderilk Associates St. P@#A MIRM90• u.. Comm. 19e 9 FF NO. 20ote: 21802 9. 520_8" 0 "1 6'-0" 2" 6' 0, 6 10' -0" 22'--0" 12'- -0" PIPE PAIUNG SLOPE 02' /FT. SLOPE .02' /Ft. SLOPE .015' /Ft. CONCRETE PARAPET ----- 9" SLAB PROFILE GRADE 36" PRESS "Rt SEW rC CONCRUE 6EA',5 22' -0" 1 11 9.84 12' -0" 108.00 ROSELAWN AVE. CSAH 26) WORKLINE SLOPE .015' /Ft. SLOPE .02' /Ft. 2 ' 7 '- 2 -4" " I 5 SPACES @ 8' -2" = 40' -10" CENTER SPAN all- ' 4 SPACES @ 10' -2 1/Z' = 40' -10" ENO SPANS SECTION OF FINISHED BRIDGE FLOOR SCALE 0 Si ROSELAWN AVENUE Rice St. to Jackson St. Street Improvements PIPE RAILING CONCRETE RAILING I TYPE J w 2' tf1 IMNe • AitAll el• 9onestroo Rosene Anderilk d VAssociates sl; art YfnnWNte Dote: J'AN. :999 3Comm. 2'? -2 Fig. NO' mm we b i i f W J Q, Im:_ LITTLE CANADA VZY Q, I ) ELpRI BELMON SK ILL M1 M T. V OOD AN GENERAL ASSESSMENT AREA ASSESSMENT AREA ROSELAWN AVENUE PROJ.87 -01 RICE ST. (TH 49) TO JACKSON ST. SCALE N/A F- Z O W W A rr t N Na i o An I N W mm dow Mm 4sm Mb mb Mm _ lea 4D am am V t r0FO? 470 _ ozo i t foe JL • 1 1© o • 9• -•.. t tn t1 V 3. G.1 I cG o ice 1. Oj a a do o o Oo5 _ o: 300 0 65a7 j7 / All 11V 4 4 1 ' Q. 18 29- — ASSESSMENT AREA ROSELAWN AVENUE PROJ.87 -01 RICE ST. (TH 49) TO JACKSON ST. SCALE 1" = 400' cNr 1 Irv- or r • / lot ' 4) (Z4 5 94 7 trip i D/ a _ - C I-1 - 51.7 40) co to O low z o io . 3) 5 o 8 . o• %til. C. 1 Q N • y 1 I a I V • AL5 • 1% ow or Ior j4 LD s 6 51 so G"? 1. Oo bo do Q-Q ASSESSMENT AREA ROSELAWN AVENUE PROJ. 87 -01 RICE rST, (TH 49) TO JACKSON ST. WSW SCALE 400' 12, f Q -Q 18- 29 -22 -31 ASS SMENT AREA POS.ELAWN AVENUE PROJ. 87---Ol RICE ST. (TH 49) TO JACKSON ST. SCALE ln _ 400' U MOLA i 401.8 G •71. too .. 1 Vab 1 1 Z.i L4- N NyW. T lk,00• too 3(Z 3) h 41MM 0 cew 2-- ID a 7 (3 ° its C 010Gj 9 qmmw. ED 4:) — -!"- 84tP 41 416 12 t 4v - f vi V* 33 r C 13 rr 6( ) t 4 lcrt'At- °Ja0u.. o y f 0 (3'q) 14) 14 (4 3) t (•4 4) t3:5- Q r p 66 r. t' too •• -2 o i t` 0% F EN70N AVE . 71.80 4 -24 •50 • ^+ Ctir10sOX2207 . , t 3 S) 50 ` 55 5A75T 1 P M P!N G alp 4-1) N 0 i 1 C i t of St -Paul •c: , i r 4s ac • Ij`o r8 In Q -Q 18- 29 -22 -31 ASS SMENT AREA POS.ELAWN AVENUE PROJ. 87---Ol RICE ST. (TH 49) TO JACKSON ST. SCALE ln _ 400' U 4 24 1, 111 70 87 A f It" 4W St ID I't w . . 1-1 $ 1 0 A A. 11 s••aY 3 r a ", fi f I or. Z. 1 • r.y... ,• ISM e %' • . . t Q I •_ , • • . !. •• •. w a 03 • y O r 7.0 i V •.. . . .. / L ig IPA 320 4 1 3 0. 1 ; 1 1 1G i ' . 1q o fa 10 11 tZ 13 14. - t j- — a o "D i i • •. t • 1 t vA • .e •ss Q82 4.13 & ST • - r I _ 's; ,'. Opp a c • 41 s low 3 low I • 4L •} • ? •' p , 141 3 t % a - t 1 • 3 i ' g t 1 s 9 , : Z 13 30 w t •- 1 2 /3 •• • t.m a r °• 14 0 2 ( 5.5 o is T 1 N 41 1r s 2g now i T r ti rr 30 . .1 h 3) Z° It 31 . 18 29 22 32i s ASSESSMENT AREA SCALE OSELAWN AVENUE PROJ. 87 -01 1 ^ = 400' RICE ST. (TH 49) TO JACKSON ST. r+ PAGE 3 OF 2 D/p NO& 09 -19 -1989 PROJECT ND. 87--01 RDSELAWN -RICE TO JACKSON PROJECT SUMMARY SEC -1 jj- T- 29- R- C2- Qty -23 4 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER MN RATE. ASSESSMENT M1- MM -NM STREET - RESIDENTIAL 0.000 UNIT AT 1, 1.25, 000 EA. STREET - COMMERCIAL 848,v 000 F. F. AT 15,000 EA. _ 129 7201500 STORM SEWER 000 UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ 0.00 MATER MAIN 848.000 Pa F. AT 30.000 EA. = 259 440.00 MATER SERVICE -6111 000 EACH AT 19,40&000 EA. _ 1, 4009 00 MATER SERVICE-2" 0013 EACH AT 1,500,000 EA. _ 11500,00 SEWER SERVICE-6" 0100 EACH AT 29500.000 EA. _ 0.00 SEC -1 fl- T-- 29- R- 22 -GQ -24 5 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STREET -REST DENT AL 3.000 UNIT AT 19125m000 EA. _ 393375, 00 STREET- -COMMERCIAL 11 159.000 F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ 171 385.00 STORM SEXIER 39000 UNIT AT 5000 000 EA. = 1, 500.00 MATER MAIN 0.000 F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ 0.00 VATER SERVICE-6" 0.000 EACH AT 1, 400.000 EA. _ 0.00 WATER SERVICE -2" 000 EACH AT 11500.000 EA. = 0.00 SEWER SERVICE -6" 0.000 EACH AT 21500a000 EA. _ 0.00 SEC- 18-- T- 29- R- 22 -00-31 8 PARCELS ASSESSED M ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STREET-RESIDENTIAL 7.000 UNIT AT 19 125.000 EA. = 7,875. 00 STREET- -COMMEERCIAL 650.000 F. F. AT 15.0O0 EA. = 99 750.00 STDRM SEWER 7.000 UNIT AT 500e000 EA. = 31500.00 WATER MAIN 0.000 F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ 0100 MATER SERVICE- 6" 0.000 EACH AT 1,400,000 EA. MATER SERVICE- 2 " EACH AT 19500a0@0 EA. SEWER ERVICE- 6 " 0.000 EACH AT 29500a000 EA. SEC .18- T- -29 -R -22- 012 -32 5 PARCELS ASSESSED IN I I ITEM QUANTITY PER w- RATE ASSESSMENT STREET - RESIDENTIAL 000 UNIT AT 1,125a 000 EA. _ STREET - COMMERCIAL 934.000 F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ STORM :SEWER 0.000 UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ VATER MAIN 796.000 F. F. AT 30.000 EA. = 23,880-00 WATER SERVICE -6" 4.000 EACH AT 1, 40Ql. 000 EA. _ J, 600.00 WATER SERVICE -2" 4.000 EACH AT 1,500,000 EA. _ 69 000.00 SEWER SERVICE -6" 3.000 EACH AT 295009000 EA. = 71500,00 O I?!P NO. 009 -19 -1989 No. B7-41 ILA T JACKS t g k PAS i j 89-19 -1989 DIP NO* VJAH M CHECK LIST STREET-- RE6ISENTIAL. - UNIT C j21 _ STET -CM ERCIAL - F.F. 3) = SM 5F3£R -.UNIT m 41 = ATER MAIN - Fe F. 51 _ uATER SERVICE -V 6) = IPTER SERVICE-28 C13 . 7) = SEAR S I . 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 COL 7 P1 H tL +. 18- 29--22 - 23-04 i 8. '88 380.00 @m m, 1i.88 8.80 I, 80 0.80 8.80 i 8 -29- 22-23 -5 1 L 88 1.00000 0.8a 18- 29- 22 -23-M6 8. 1,. X8.8$ e0 328,* 88 8.88 8. Ae 8. oe 1.8- x}-22- 23-87 22 8.80 8. Qe 18 -29-22 -24-1 18- 29- '2- 24 -88 i2 : 8. Q 0 0. Qe 8.08 18- 29 -22 -24 -0017 1 sees e. 6e e. era e . +a 18- 29-22 -24 -0019 1. t 9418 2.88 8.88 @. e a 8. 0 Q. 80 18 -29-22 31-Mi la 8. @e low 8.08 8.00 8. Q 0 Q. 00 18- 29 -2z -31 -802 l, 1.88 8.00 e. Q8 8.8N 8.80 18- 29- 22- 31--80 3 X8.88 1. Se 8.00 8.88 I8- 29- 22 -3I-- 4 1.0 8.80 1.80 8.60 e. ea 8.00 A l 8 18 -29-22 -31-5 l no. 1. Q 8.00 eon 0.8e 8.00 18-29-22-31-0024 e 1.80 1. e e. 6e e. +a e. +e 18- 29- 22 -31 -M 88 00 8.00 0, eo 8.00 0. ee 1.8 - 2g- 22- 31--8S r2 8.08 1 e, as e. e. ea e. a 8 -29- 22-32 -8Q1 sees 12.88 8.08 8.88 8.80 0. Q 0 8. 18-29-22-32-M4 i.80 1b8. 168.00 oe1. ea i. e 1. eye 18- 29-22 -32- 8 8.80 118.88 8.88 118.08 1 1.80 8.80 22 -32 -0211829- e 318.88 518188 2. 80 2,00 x.80 GRAND TOTALS 18.88 359.1.88 M 08 1644.00 5.60 5.00 3.88 D/P NO. ITEM STREET—RESIDENTIAL STREET — COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERV I CE -2" SEWER SERVICE -60 TOTAL ASSESSMENT STREET—RESIDENTIAL STREET — COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER. SERV I CE— * WATER SERVICE—B" SEWER SERV I CE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT STREET — RESIDENTIAL STREET - COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET- RESIDENTIAL STREET - COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" MATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PROJECT NO. 87--01 ROSELAWN —RICE TO JACKSON ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE @.@Q71@ 1 @ @. on @0@ 328. @ @ UNIT F. F. UNIT F. F. EACH EACH EACH AT AT AT AT AT AT AT 1,125o@00 EA. 15.000 EA. 5@@. @@0 EA. 30.000 EA. 1,400,000 EA. 1, 500.000 EA. 2,500a 0 00 EA. UNIT AT $1,125o@00 EA. F. F. AT ** *$15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT * *$500. @ @O EA. _ F. F. AT * * *$3 @. 00O EA, EACH AT $1,400s0@0 EA. _ EACH AT $1, 500.000 EA. _ EACH AT $2950@a@00 EA. UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA. _ F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500v @00 EA. _ F. F. AT 30. @00 EA. _ EACH AT 19400-000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 500.000 EA. EACH AT 2,500o000 EA. _ UNIT AT F. F. AT UNIT AT F. F. AT EACH AT EACH AT EACH AT 1,125,000 EA. 159000 EA. 500o@00 EA. 30. 000 EA. 11400o@00 EA. 1,500,000 EA. 21500a@00 EA. PAGE 1 OF 6 09 -19 -1989 ASSESSMENT 18- 29 -22 -23 -0004 18- 29- 22- 23 — @ @05 1, 5Q Q. OQ 79 400. 00 18- 29- 22- 23 - 0006 0.00 s 1, 800.0@ 0.00 18- 29 -22 -23 -0007 4, 920. 00 141760-00 P X10. LTEM STREET - RESIDENTIAL STREET -- COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN 44ATER SE RV I Imo: —S ". ATER SERVICE-2" SEWER SERVICE—G" TOTALSSESMENT = STREET— RESIDENTIAL STREET- COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN MATER SERVICE -611 44ATE:R SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL :ASSESSMENT = STREET7RESIDENTIAL STREET STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TDTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET --RES I DENT I AL STREET - COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER 44ATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PROJECT NO. 87 -01 ROSELAWN -RICE TO JACKSON ASSESSMENT ROLL QLMT I TY PER wo UNIT AT 122,49 200 F. F N AT MQ U I T A'I' 0 F. 'F'. AT 0.000 EACH AT EACH EACH AT EA. _ EACH AT 000 0.Oe0 0.000 0.000 000 0.OQt0 000 RATE M I p 125s ZQQN EAR. 15,00000 EA* . 50Ot 000 EA. 30. s: .` 1, 400.000 EA. 19500s@00 EA. _ 2-9500,000 EA. _ UNIT AT 11, • 25, 00 EA & _.. F. F. AT 15,o 000 EA. — UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 1,400o000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 500.000 EA. _ EACH AT 29500s@00 EA. _ UNIT AT 19125.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 19400,000 EA. EACH AT 1,500.000 EA. _ EACH AT 29500,000 EA. _ UNIT AT 1,125o@00 EA. _ F. F. AT 15s000 EA. UNIT AT 500.000 EA.. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. = EACH AT 1, 400.000 EA. _ EACH AT 19500s@00 EA, EACH AT 2,500,000 EA. _ PAGE 2 OF 6 09 -19 -1989 ASSESSMENT 18- 29 -22 -24 -0001 11830, 00 0.00 1, 830.00 18- 29 -22 -24 -0002 159555,00 15,555,00 18- 29 -22 -24 -0017 1, 125.00 500.00 0. eel 11625,00 18- 29 -22 -24 -0018 11125,00 500.00 1,625-00 STREET --RES I DENT I AL STREET- CDMMERCI AL STORM SEWER VATER MA I N VATER SERVICE --.6" MATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET- -RES I.DENT I AL STMEET- COMMERCT A .. STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -621. 4fATE R SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -60 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET- RESIDENTIAL STREET—COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MA I N MATER SERVICE-611 WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE —G. TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET—RESIDENTIAL STREET-COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" MATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT N0. 87-81 ROSELAWN —RICE TO JACKSON ASSESSMENT ROLL GUANTITY 000 0.000 000 1000 0. o00 o 000 000 1.000 000 000 PER RATE UNIT AT 14,125a 000 EA. _ F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 506w060 EA. F. F. AT 001 000 EA. _ EACH AT 1,1400,o 000 EA. = EACH AT 1,9500a 000, EA. EACH AT' 2, 500.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 17125,000 EA. _ F. F. AT 159000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. EACH AT 11400a@00 EA. _ EACH AT 1,500,000 EA. _ EACH AT 2,500.000 EA. _ UNIT AT F. F. AT UNIT AT F. F. AT EACH AT EACH AT EACH AT 11125m000 EA. 15.000 EA. 500,000 EA. 30.000 EA. 11400m@00 EA. 19500a000 EA. 21500a@00 EA. UNIT AT 1,125o@00 EA. F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. EACH AT 1,400,000 EA. EACH AT 1,500,000 EA. EACH AT 29500,000 EA. _ PAGE 3 OF 6 09 -19 -1989 ASSESSMENT 18- 29 -22 -24 -0019 11 1 `5.0 1 s0.00 500.00 s0.00 so. 00 11625,00 18- 29 -22 -31 -0001 500, k -0 s0.00 1, 6`5.00 18- 29 -22 -31 -0002 500,00 sO.00 00 11625,00 18- 29 -22 -31 -0003 1, 125. 00 s0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 11625-00 D/p NIL ITEM STREET — RESIDENTIAL STREET -- COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MA I N WATER SERVICE --6" 44ATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -618 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET -REE I DENT I AL STREET — COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET -- RES I DENT I AL STREET - -COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER VATER MAIN WATER SE RV I EE -6" WATER SERVICE -211 SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET- RESIDENTIAL STREET- COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER VATS R MA I N WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PROJECT X10. 87-01 ROSELAWN -RICE TO JACKSON ASSESSMENT ROLL 12UANTITY o. 000 0. X00 0.000 0.000 000 000 000 0. 000 000 PER RATE Q0Ewd0ffxdMN- r M UN I T AT I s 125.000 EA. _ F. Fw AT 15.000 EA. ON I T AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 19400,000 EA. _ EACH AT 11500o@00 EA. _ EACH AT 29500.000 EA. UNIT AT Pr F. AT UNIT AT F. F. AT EACH AT EACH AT EACH AT 11,: 125.000 EA. 15.000 EA. 500.000 EA. 30.00.0 EA. 1,400,000 EA. 19500s000 EA. 2,500,000 EA. UNIT AT 1,125o@00 EA. = F. F. AT 15.000 EA. = UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 19400.000 EA. EACH AT 19500,000 EA. _ EACH AT 21500e@00 EA. _ UNIT AT 1,125o@00 EA. F. F. AT 159000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. = F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 19400e@00 EA. EACH AT 1, 500.000 EA. _ EACH AT 21500e000 EA. _ PAGE 4 OF 6 09 -19 -1989 ASSESSMENT 18- 29 -22 -31 -0004 11125,00 0.00 500.00 so, 00 1, 625.00 18- 29 -22 -31 -0005 19125, 0.0 0.00 500. 100 19625,00 18- 29 -22 -31 -0024 s0. 00 0. o0 0. in 11625,00 18- 29 -22 -31 -0025 11125-00 0.0o 500.00 0.00 0.00 s0.00 0.00 1, 625.00 STREET -- TRIDENT I AL ST REET--COMMERC I AL STORM SEWER MATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER BE RV, ICE -6" TOTAL. = 4qSSESSMENT STREET - RESIDENTIAL STREET - EDMMERCI-AL STORM SEWER WATER MA I N WATER SERVI CE -611 WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER SERVICE- -6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = STREET° -RESIDENTIAL STREET - COMMERCIAL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2" SEWER BERV I CE —:6" TOTAL ASSESSMENT STREET- bRES I DENT I AL STIREET-I OMMERC I AL STORM SEWER WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE -6" WATER SERVICE -2.# SEWER SERVICE -6`" TOTAL ASSESSMENT = PROJECT NO. 87 -01 ROSELAWN —RICE TO JACKSON ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE e 00 Q. 000 0.000 0 x#00 ei. 000 0.000 Qi00 000 168.000 1.000 UNIT AT 11125o000 EA. = F. F. AT 1. X00 EA. NAM UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F.F. AT 30v@00 EA. EACH AT 1,400,000 EA. _ EACH AT 19500o@00 EA. _ EACH AT 29500m000 EA. _ UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA. _ F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 400.000 EA. = EACH AT 1,5009000 EA. = EACH AT 21500o@00 EA. = UNIT AT 1,125o@00 EA. _ F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. F. F. AT 30.000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 400.000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 500.000 EA. EACH AT 2, 500.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 1, 125.000 EA. = F. F. AT 15.000 EA. = UNIT AT 500.000 EA. _ F. F. AT 3@m000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 4 @0.000 EA. EACH AT 19500o@00 EA. _ EACH AT 21500o000 EA. _ PAGE 5 OF b 09 -19 -1989 ASSESSMENT 18--29 -22 -31 -0042 99750, ele 0.00 9, 750-. 00 18- 29 -22 -32 -0001 890.00 18- 29 -22 -32 -0004 180. Q 0 a * *$0. OBI 18- 29 -22 -32 -0008 0.00 2,520.00 0.00 5,040.00 11400.00. 11500. 00 2,500-00 1 , 960. 00 I1!'P NO. ITEM PROJECT CVO. 87 -01 ROSELAWN —RICE TO JACKSON ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY STREET - RESIDENTIAL *0.000 STREET 'COMMERCIAL 510.000 STORM SEWER 44ATER MAIN MATER MAIN e00 VATER SERVICE -6" 000 MATER SERVICE -2" 1.000 SEWER SERVICE-6" 000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT = 3, 591.000 STREET —RES I DENT I AL STREET - COMMERCIAL 510.000 STORM SEWER EA. 44ATER MAIN 51 0,m 00el WATER SERVICE -6 2.000 WATER SERV ICE- 2 " 2.000 SEWER SERVICE-611 EA. = TOTAL .ASSESSMENT AT 22 PARCELS ASSESSED y STREET -RES I DENT IAL 10.000 STREET -- COMMERCIAL 3, 591.000 STORM SEWER 10.000 MATER MAIN EA. VATER SERVICE -S " AT WATER SERVICE -2 11 5.000 SEWER SERVICE -6" TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT PER RATE UNIT AT 1, 125.000 EA. F. F. AT 15.`000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA. = F. F w AT 30v000 EA. _ EACH AT 19'4009000 EA. EACH AT 19,500a 000 EA. EACH AT 29500o@00 EA. _ UNIT AT 1,1256000 EA. = F. F. AT 15.000 EA. _ UNIT AT 500.000 EA • _ F. F. AT 30.000 EA. EACH AT 11400s000 EA. _ EACH AT 1, 500.000 EA. _ EACH AT 29500,000 EA. _ UNIT AT F. F. AT UNIT AT F. F. AT EACH AT EACH AT EACH AT 11125s000 EA. 15.000 EA. 500.000 EA. 000 EA. 19400s000 EA. 1, 500.000 EA. 2, 500.000 EA. FRUt b Ur b 09 -19 -1989 ASSESSMENT 18- 29 -22 -32 -0021 1, 770. OQ 3, 540.00 8, 210.0 18- 29 -22 -32 -0025 7,650,00 0.00 2,800,00 3, 000.00. 1 59000.00 339750-00 GRAND TOTALS 111250,00: 531865, 00 57 000.00 499 320.00 71500s@0 77500a 00 1419435,00 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS., after due notice, of public hearing on the construction of bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter bridge,, storm. sewer , water main, and appurtenances on Rosel awn Avenue from Rice 'Street (T.,H,. 49) to Jackson Street, City Pro Ject 87-ftOl a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the not Yoe duly given was duly held on October 23, 1989, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW,, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,, as follows: is That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct bituminous roadway with concrete curb and .gutter, bridge,, storm sewer,, water main, and appurtenances on Rose lawn Avenue from Rice Street (T.H. 49) to Jack son .Street, City Project 87-01., as described in the notice of hearing thereof.) and orders the same to be made. 2e The execution of a cooperative agreement with Ramsey County for said improvement is hereby authorized. RESOLUTION WHEREAS s p l ans. + ors Project N ea . S U P a 62- 626 -03 Bridge No p 62559 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross -- sect ions for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County State did Highway Nos 26 within the I imits . o+ the city as a Federa.] Aid. project have been prepared and presented to the citys NOW , THEREFORE s BE I T RESOLVED: That said plans b e in al i things approved . RESOLUTION WHEREAS , p l an s f or Project. No . S v A. P. 62- 626 --04 showing proposed alignment. prof i 1 es grades and cross- --sect ions f or the construction, reconstruction ors i mp movement of Caen t y Et at e Aid Highway No. 26 within the limits the city as a Mate Aid project have been prepared and presented to the city. NCW I THEkEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in a l l things approved, f Action . bar Council ei Endorsed Modified,., Rejected...,.... MEMORANDUM Date TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Alley vacation and Preliminary Plat LOCATION Cope Avenue, between Ariel.and German Streets APPLICANT /OWNER: Willard Morton PROJECT TITLE: Sheryl's Addition DATE:: October 16, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting the approval of a preliminary plat for seven single- dwelling lots and the vacation of an unused alley. Refer to the maps on pages 5 and 6 and the applicants' letter on page 7.) BACKGROUND August 1985: Nancy Anderson (the former property owner) petitioned the City Council for the improvement of Cope Avenue Summer 1989: Cope Avenue was constructed from Ariel Street to Hazel Street. DISCUSSION Alley Vacation The property owners on both sides of the alley have requested its vacation. It is not needed for traffic circulation or property access. The northerly one -half, however, is needed to plat the property into seven lots. Preliminary Plat r The platting of this property appears straight forward. The seven single dwelling lots meet all requirements for width and area. The streets and utilities were installed with the Cope Avenue public improvement project. Additional grading must be done on the low area along the south lots lines of lots 4 and 5 for drainage purposes. This will probably result in the removal of some the trees. i RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the resolution on page 8 to vacate 'the alley between German and Ariel Streets, south of Cope Avenue. Approval is in the public interest because a. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. b. This alley segment is not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access. C* The alley right -of -way is not needed and Maplewood's policy has.been to vacate alley rights -of -way whenever Possible. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval a. Approval of the final Vrading, drainage and erosion control plans by the City Engineer. b. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. c. Submit a signed developer's agreement with the required surety for erosion control and any tree planting required to the City Engineer. d. Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the Director of Community Development. This plan must illustrate trees over eight inches in diameter that are to be removed, those that are to be retained, and those that are to be replanted. 2 REFERENCE 3 2P 24 25 627 28 291301 y4) Ij - 0 rld T -S 3 57 9 8, 0 X7 4 3 2 10' 2 lr L 4 RAU lb 2t3 24 6.27 28129 3 f.." N.Property in question 4 2f; 1 1 18 19 20.21 2223' 2627 28 2930 VAc 4 40 AO ,3r/ 1.5 114 13112YNIO 9 B 7 6 5 c 3 op 4 AVE 6 -3 .30 0 .3 Z---T J-71-o7 C. o 5 3 Z) 5 k(% ( '08 If 6zQY (5 O2 - 2 v x yx IL IVA x q V) 2,33)0 1 2All (3? . SPTeyproposedforvacation 10 554.14co V A CA TF, D VOC 44 ?-8-4Z 1 43 (0. 5 L 71 C3 4 13 lfir—q si 6/ M (10-1 h Coo) 0138) (98 5 M* 1 6 t` t- 13 3-3 4- (8 4) ($ 5) < 66 _75-0Z 15 C3 9) 14 LAURI E 10 7 j L c Zj&2-l" (9 2 J. 84.52 Its 18. (Z NJgi ( 100 Ld) 57.3 4- 1 I — — F: ass 9 135 + l(pl.SZ fn V) "S A CAI 1 (74) 'n07 (4 7) % ( 8 7) 0 2- 7) 135 150. 0 2 0* UjF3 (h amass* Z LLJ U.) 13177) L t UU ? 0 120, cr 0 6 13 .10 t43 04) Q1% co (I X J31-06 13 13038) LA. 09) ( 89) 07-39 cc 3 t- cr/35. (01 04C'0 um) Uj I4. 3 0 4 it ILI 55 s— fr3l4(79) 5 5 10'1'15384-53 135Q31 t4le). co ro 610 liz <rl Z 3 IL < - 9 410 1,315, 1 5s. 1 6z9133.5 01) 6Ln (7 Z 0 Z5 SO) U C* 4- 9, ( 1 Z) LA.0 Iq < (I 0a), 7 7 CL 72a < 3 3 4 oz 144-1( IL—) Z.1 1-1.3 -t 140 3) 0 3 C>() f5 I 1,z. I 15 26 Q 0+ 0' on 5 0 75 10 Z 3 135 40 6 135 co 13-4.?- 4 Ld /3A?,4 7 35) N C) R T z GL 38) 13 ,F 5 8 j^ (S 3) 12 (a .7 o o (3 4) 10 (3,3) o 14 Z. zi 5 4 9 10 3 3) 113Z.34 O) x.4.9 4 1 10 { 4 35 9 IL ul (3 Z) V1 (}-1, rl z . o 13; I I 407r-52, V1 5 E C,0 N D 11Uj , Co (A14 9) 4 2 l3r - 0 - T-- 4` ' 1% ROAD 90.15 7S•3 75 6 0 (43) -1 (4-4) co 05) 0 47 2r` 3 4 5 Iv 90 ity water towe T 7rp1it21224526n' 727. 28 29 6u) Lai 3 op 4 AVE 6 -3 .30 0 .3 Z---T J-71-o7 C. o 5 3 Z) 5 k(% ( '08 If 6zQY (5 O2 - 2 v x yx IL IVA x q V) 2,33)0 1 2All (3? . SPTeyproposedforvacation 10 554.14co V A CA TF, D VOC 44 ?-8-4Z 1 43 (0. 5 L 71 C3 4 13 lfir—q si 6/ M (10-1 h Coo) 0138) (98 5 M* 1 6 t` t- 13 3-3 4- (8 4) ($ 5) < 66 _75-0Z 15 C3 9) 14 LAURI E 10 7 j L c Zj&2-l" (9 2 J. 84.52 Its 18. (Z NJgi ( 100 Ld) 57.3 4- 1 I — — F: ass 9 135 + l(pl.SZ fn V) "S A CAI 1 (74) 'n07 (4 7) % ( 8 7) 0 2- 7) 135 150. 0 2 0* UjF3 (h amass* Z LLJ U.) 13177) L t UU ? 0 120, cr 0 6 13 .10 t43 04) Q1% co (I X J31-06 13 13038) LA. 09) ( 89) 07-39 cc 3 t- cr/35. (01 04C'0 um) Uj I4. 3 0 4 it ILI 55 s— fr3l4(79) 5 5 10'1'15384-53 135Q31 t4le). co ro 610 liz <rl Z 3 IL < - 9 410 1,315, 1 5s. 1 6z9133.5 01) 6Ln (7 Z 0 Z5 SO) U C* 4- 9, ( 1 Z) LA.0 Iq < (I 0a), 7 7 CL 72a < 3 3 4 oz 144-1( IL—) Z.1 1-1.3 -t 140 3) 0 3 C>() f5 I 1,z. I 15 26 Q 0+ 0' on 5 0 75 10 Z 3 135 40 6 135 co 13-4.?- 4 Ld /3A?,4 7 35) N C) R T z GL 38) 13 ,F 5 8 j^ (S 3) 12 (a .7 o o (3 4) 10 (3,3) o 14 Z. zi 5 4 9 10 3 3) 113Z.34 O) x.4.9 4 1 10 { 4 35 9 IL ul (3 Z) V1 (}-1, rl z . o 13; I I 407r-52, V1 5 E C,0 N D 11Uj , Co (A14 9) 4 2 l3r - 0 - T-- 4` ' 1% ROAD 90.15 7S•3 75 6 0 (43) -1 (4-4) co 05) 0 47 2r` 3 4 5 Iv 90 PROPERTY LINE i ZONING MAP 5 ATTACHMENT 2 8,75 0 26 Q 0+ 0' PROPERTY LINE i ZONING MAP 5 ATTACHMENT 2 ts. 11 •w '.tea ,r.' 1 n - ^+... y s +. r ar YI'. T•i!1'Olt'•.il•"=/JI+>M, F pe 1-_^'' i. R. i, yt• M+' M' iVAI 'i.1'/r!'' „:'Ij,,.',,•I!WY p•'••t• Yr'^..:; M•• ... r i ti. ' t i...p wok y++ yird 1 .+"y° ` i ww,y2 r•K' b,{i ipp1 ! ; *. = r. ' . WW1. Irk + •t 4••.I •i wr7 ±'• e. ? l .• ' ` 4 :. j • .. 7 ^+IN'RY}i+`{, tG '1`41GG•YMAt['':+yt: • . *W +\.y:AryjIl 'Ar M, w M . • +Mr!/•+T ! i; .rl.c x. r”. i.y.. _ W • _ , o 14 LL pn W = _ NCC V a s m Q UJ W a o `' r z 1= Y' 1 U ij{ N .'4 W o zW w ,` F- x` Wit., ua, iA i o ww gn Q ` y! r. V wot1m r a• . o O a a i ~ W J 4 ... Ix .. a2 a C 13S 10 3NII uv3 • r z 13315 edH o -13 f_ _ 4 ; ! \ ( tf _ c C e 4 uj 0 2 Sy ` i t b a V. c c c r. v ro W 98 6 Fes- } a. W ^ p t 1 t, v J c C v f. 40 v V 1VN e' o S 086 v d t e c e pi a oa r e0 a e ro tft • u C h. . C C O .1 do LJ N. jlr V 4 v t Q, O •1 095 to j 110, d' e i r ' F` vy I! I' • . 1 1 / r i N M 08, vs: I - zl R i 13381S N bW 8 30 0 r 0f 6 ATTACHMENT 3 0 ' nnJ i w 4 ; ! \ ( tf _ c C e 4 uj 0 2 Sy ` i t b a V. c c c r. v ro W 98 6 Fes- } a. W ^ p t 1 t, v J c C v f. 40 v V 1VN e' o S 086 v d t e c e pi a oa r e0 a e ro tft • u C h. . C C O .1 do LJ N. jlr V 4 v t Q, O •1 095 to j 110, d' e i r ' F` vy I! I' • . 1 1 / r i N M 08, vs: I - zl R i 13381S N bW 8 30 0 r 0f 6 ATTACHMENT 3 0 ' t s 5«..e.;...r c.. a.. :.w«t.w.r;.::r.L.s...:.A.•' lc .w:ru•+.aNCY'f+^..u,......... t s s : Oft s f y ._: _..__. _....._.rte., ,... __. -. ,.... .._ ... ,-_.. _... v tv CA CA V-o x t A. fA A.0 C-1 f CA, Ir r y j t ir 'i' .•may i t r 1 4 ° 5 ! r r, \err i F i f F tt R C ` • 7 L h . T 3 1 ` •.. t `5 -. .fit VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Willard Morton, Tom and Denise Kloes initiated proceedings to vacate the public.interest in the alley between German and Ariel Streets, south of Cope Avenue WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: Lots. One and Two, Block one, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows 1. A majority of the owners of property' abutting said alley have signed a petition for this vacation 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 21 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 30 The City Council held a public hearing on October 23, 1989 to consider this vacation Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law & All persons present at,this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports.and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described alley, public interest in the property will accrue to the following- described abutting properties: Lot One, Block One and Lot Two, Block One, Smith and Taylors Addition to North St. Paul. Attachment 5 8 B. Alley Vacation and Preliminary Plat: Sheryl Is Addition Ken. Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report for this requested preliminary plat for seven single- dwelling lots and the vacation of an unused alley, Donald Campbell, surveyor and representing the applicant , said the grading on this site wa done in conjunction with another project arid: the f .i nz,11. g rad i lly is complete at this time Mr. Campbell said they would comply with all of the conditions of the staff recommendation. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: 10 Approval of the resolution to vacate the alley between German and Ariel Streets south of Cope Avenue. Approval is in the public interest because: a. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. b. This alley segment is not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency veil i c I access. C. The alley right -of- -way is not needed and Maplewood' s policy his been to vaca tc, a l l ey rights -of -way whenever possible 2. Approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval: a. Approval of the final grading, drainage and erosion control plans by the City Engineer. b. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. 110tx: i n(J styles shall be illustrated which II1iniinize 10 Planning Cbinmission -4- Minutes 10- -2--89 grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this appr. oved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. c.. Submit a signed developer's . a.greement with the required surety for erosion control.and any tree planting required to the.City Engineer, d. Approval o.f a tree removal and planting plan by the Director. of Community Development. This plan must illustrate trees over eight inches in diameter that are to.be removed, those that are to be retained, and those that are to be replanted. Commissioner S 1 e tten seconded byes -- 11xc -h 1 , Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, S igmundik, Sletten C. 1357 ` ope Avenue ( Corner Kick Soccer ) P rking Authorization Co I itional Use Permit Secretary Olson presented the staff report for this requested conditional use permit for a 3,066 - square-foot acid i t i on proposed on the front of the Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center. City Council authorization for 151 fewer. parking spaces is also requested. Secretary Olson said the majority of the neighbors' comments objected to any future liquor License being issued to this business t A commissioner asked `if liquor establishments in Maplewood are located adjacent to residential prope rties. Staff said \ 1 iquor y be adjacent (ruch as adjoining back yard:) to residential roperties, but there are none located on the same street. Tom Hope, the oVner of the property, said he did not wan the condition prohibiting the sale of alcoho c beverages included in the recom endation. 11r. Hope said he did not have to be a specific as he has been about future . use of 11 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION. APPLICANT/ OWNER. PROJECT TITLE: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstrand Associate Planner* Pylon Sign.Height Variance 17.80 East County Road D Maplewood Hotel Corporation Days Inn September 20, 1989. Ac-Lion by Council: Endorsed Modiffied Rejected.. Date--- The applicant is requesting approval of a 50-foot sign height variance, I The existing pylon sign is 50-feet-tall; the proposed sign height is 100 feet. Refer'to the applicant's letter on page 8 BACKGROUND In December 1987, the Days Inn requested a sign code amendment that would allow taller signs by conditional use permit. Their 10 request at that time was for permission to erect a 75-foot-tall pylon sign. On December 22, 1987, the Design Review Board recommended denial of the proposed amendment. The applicant then dropped this request and erected a 50-foot-tall sign instead. The maximum sign height permitted by codede is 50 feet. This maximum height can only be used when the sign is setback at least 75 feet from the front lot line, CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Section 36 7.10, subdivision 6(2) of State law requires that the following findings be made before a variance to the zoning chapter of City Code can be granted: 11 Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 20 The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official -controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances . unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character, of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance,, DISCUSSION There are no circumstances unique to this property that would cause the.applicant. "undue hardship" if code was met. The problem is that the Days Inn does not have freeway frontage givin g it the exposure desired. This is not a unique problem for this site. It is one shared by many businesses that are near a freeway .or highway, but not close enough for clear visibility of their sign. OFStatutealsostatesthattheplight of the landowner must be found to be due to circumstances "unique" to the property, not created by the landowner. This situation was created by the developer by the mere placement of the motel on a site that .does not have freeway exposure. Staff realizes that this is a particularly difficult situation for a motel which depends on being visible from the freeway, however, under the statute, there is no basis for approval. Furthermore, granting this variance would set a precedent making it difficult, if not impossible, to prevent similar requests by businesses that desire.freeway or. highway visibility. RECOMMENDATION Denial of the request by the Days Inn for a 50 -foot sign height. variance to increases their pylon sign height to 100 feet, on the basis that. 1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. The circumstance, being the lack of freeway frontage, is not a unique problem for this site,, but shared by many properties. 2 The applicant's dilemma of lack of freeway visibility was created by the original developer by building on a site that does not have the exposure desired for a motel. 3. This property is being put to a reasonable use under the conditions allowed by.the official controls. 4. According to.state statute, economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 2 REFERENCE Site Description 1. Site size: 6.88 acres 2.0 Existing Land Use: Days Inn Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land.is zoned or planned for commercial development. Maplewood Mall is located to the east and southeast, Toys R Us is under construction to the northeast and Birch Run Station is under construction to the southwest. The remaining adjacent land is undeveloped. Past Action 9- 13 -82: Council approved a 22 -foot sign height variance for Denny's Restaurant and the Cricket Inn (now the Days Inn) at I -94 and Century Avenue, to allow a 5.0- foot -tall pylon. (80 feet was requested) . 1- 14 -85: Council approved a 21 -foot sign height variance for the Sinclair station at 2158 Rice Street to allow a 50-- foot -tall pylon sign. (58 feet was proposed) . Planning 1. Land Use.Plan designation: DC, Diversified Center 2. Zoning: BC, Business Commercial TEDAYSINN Attachments 1 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4 . Sign Sketch 5. Applicant's letter of justification dated August 11, 1989 3 SINCLAIR STATION Sign height variance approved on 1.14 -85 } IR R wrts 4.ow4 G-) LIM owra JL PAYS lNrl SITF r DFNNY'S RESTAPRANT-F)AYS PINI (formerlv Cricket Inn) Sign variance approved on.9-13-q2) t LOCATION MAP 4 qIVA it's Attochment. 1 III I . 1 0 N Pon R—OA--D- FA- r _ ..._VV_ ... .._ 1 , 7 le h 5 . U•zo• 53713 fV I Ln 01 S.42 ac• , 01 L, , .CHILDREN S C) Aj 00 P A LACE 2 1 a i 10 3 50 cc. S. 0 4 a.c 5 S . 44' S d.,4' Cii 5 ! ') C'"' E _ $ K t 3.3 p. 21 yB k _i'l t 4 New. r: of ?J P. Tr at-n m 1 55 oh Et' N / V) My / N 10.66 me- W 0 Eserrco Oil ,. $ o,.. c ZoQ4gL8 0 r- cr\ DAYS INN c 2 C) 2 A t ^ 0 ,p , • OV S h t K h 100 Q1 to m M M 0c, L o c /7.9i• x'7.19 ` y N i MAHLEVVUUL) MALL 1.31.5 DO: o o 1 OOD V PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP on Atta icnient 2 4 N 9 90,•?F.sS 656'05'. t `... ` of - k v _. S5'Ob'S "i ,V - '''Of•'O .SSa'SF // :` -,0(7 sa c fJUU, /,/ 'vnv )Su•ny t Y t~ or /For/ ;ti «,n_-o F__ _._______.` Y.__-_. _.._- .._.•._ I__._______________ _--- -. - - -- h 4h ry t',OS >: /uiFV ' /fU,P, Sasu:o -. -_ ,_ : --..; '......,., O r0)y •jlinc'J D JJ! /j0 i'. f•! +.vrS '";.1.>:rs .....,,,.+•+. o s N j A It IC Cl 9 es ke tD t i sly , .vi,„ i • _` - , s -tom- . '-- ' ""1c,yy`- -- _'• LL r - _._._...1 .. - _.....__ .._._.___ -_ t - j -- -• --- r±.. rte.,` // • i Q • •:•': •:• :••::;• Vii': • ;Y:: ••'•' :; : •Y;•. •I•. + :1• •! /: _ l \ Y \: ' / Y• •••' :••'''• Y•{•Y}• •:Y: S• • `+'' : ::••Y• .:Y;a•:' • :::•. :Y; •:•:'Y•:••'••': :':•• i: :Y; :-:•Yi;:1•:'' ': .. •'`+G'f, , .,.. / t ::: • •: :•' : ' 1• • < i -Y •' Y• • : i• • •: YY Y• ,:•• •; :Y Y;ii •• i 'yl \ •. :.+ \ bw} I Q .• : :•::• :•; i .fir ` +• y \ • • • Y;• :• • :Y ' : ::•'• %Y:i : i :.:. •... :• :. ± + %. •':. ;':t, - ` • , / / / ' i ••' Y • • ! Y• • :IY :••.• • • •,• lw i.•• •YI ••I ••i• YY`' •' i' i•! •/ Y • • ,•,.,'•1 Y +.: •Y Y•• ::•Y•• • Y• . •444 • .: .• ;• Y' : Y'• l l / 4 , Oa b V S' // % 34s •a SIGN LOCATION o a 1 10 \ . SITE PLAN 6 Attachment 3 4 N PROPOSED SIGN 0 0 Attachment 4 4 N August 1 1, 1989 City o6 Maptewood Torn E k6 tAand 1 830 F. county Road 6 Mapt ewo o d, MN 5 5 1 U y To Wftom It May C o nc ern : The intent o6 thi6 tetten .,s to pt ead m y care kr1 the ()act t{zat oven the pays t two years o6 owning the Va yes Inn we have nec ekv ed n.umenou/5 compta4,nt/s {nom cups toni en,s an pote ntiak cu/s tom efL,5 that our Ho e. .4-6 ex nerve -y hand o We have t.,,L ' ed to d ca -e. w.t.t h tFLtis p)LobZem kyt many way ,6, itoweven we stk't ' Have peop.f e c ito 4oavc this area a6ten "giving. up„ and go on dowfi the Woad to othvL hotet6 . We have at, o had num enous compta chits 6/toni 3M C onpmatl(o rz who would titze to u/ se u/s m.oke but when new guest.s -try to ()-Oid u,s they have a hand -time. Conti equeiitCY, toe. to.5 e a 6a4-4. 6 han.e of the4'A bu.5.,ne.s,s and the 6 tony -u nepea-ted at ofhen bins ne6 6 e6 . When thi.6 hotel. wars on,g,naUy a Hotc'day I nil -C nece4- mono comptaint,6 about the tocat 'Coit than aU the o-thuL Hott'.day I rtn,6 combined. Now with the new bu,itding/s go4.fzg up around ups, we w-c* be v- *- AtuaUy hidden 6Aom att d.OLection/s and compte-te -'y 64oin the 64eeway arid we have been adv.4-*,6 ed by Days I iir,i I fi,te, ,Liiat.'orzat Headqua.nten.5 t[tat imperative that we do .6 ometh-Oig - imnied4 ateky. They liav e n e ee,t.v ed many comptaint6. n /s 4- . <-t ftas ud a 1i -ca# y be { 6k')id, t 1 c,.urivc'rt t c zc c' on the tnavete)L6 wltb w.4-'.6 ft to be our gue -s t6 atld o z -tho f)vt 5 oii colto aiig ht Live in the tnetno area acid in4-g li t w4- 6 h to conic) ()o f o(I. r ens aunant on enteAtainrnent -rt the evertkrtg . Vun nequest (-.6 that we be penm-i-tted to nai6 e oui eunneiit 6 -tg jt 6nom 5 0 6eet to 10.0 6eet; it wo ut d go a t o izg way -towan d s n, ern e d y,trt y the inconv4.ence to ou L custornen3 and p,tea6 e ou.rc. con.potia-t c cct)-,tome.73 such ass 3M and othen6 . It woutd be coii6kde4ed a taiidma.i k) .Such a5 the Hotiday Inn 6 kg n on 351V 9 3b kn Ross eve.. e Ma)i y bins -t 11 C, /S 5 C 5 around the Hotiday Inn advekt.,s e that they are rtext door to the Hotiday Inn, two btocfz,s east o6 the Hot-c* day I itii, etc.. tt14,N1 .tile new Maplewood C)Lo6,sing Cen-ten open4 -)ig /s oojt, malty otiien bu SIOIC/5 5 C/S wcXt have the same pnobtem we are expvLtenc.rty a,id tiik.5 woutd cvLtainty be a bk.g . help to the.c .,s, po-terzt -iaZ. eu stoinvL -. that the Bunt:ngton Coat Sto,te J6 u6 t acno6 s the s -tn.e c t ()Aoo' tllc Da.y6 Inn on that the Pannefzoefze i Re6taunaiit 4.'s f.U6 t 110ntlt 06 -tile Da.y6 Inn on maybe in the 6 the Maps' ewood Matt k,5 1 U5 t ac "Lo/s 6 the 6tnee-t {nom the Days I n)i. 8 Attachment 5 4, t • f ..,;t 1 Lir r,, 5. -,:, . n >'1t,Z tl•: i f1%.s':::.1! «i fly ..4 iti,: r!:3R:i4 i.'i. I am sune many a{y you have expen.enced t nn o l o{ nt f not being abte to a .6 env.-'ee on bu sti 1ess when you had tnave.2ed many houn6 an wene juet not aeeustarned to a i ane.a za you can cen.ta- i.nty empathize w4*:t{t aun tn.ave- Urig 6n4*e.nd6 . Many a6 aun kacax bu6ine6,s peopte have asfzed ua w hy we have not dune 6amething about out vi,6.bixtity and even peopke wwLf2ing fan the e,ty have 6 ai.d t{rat we /s houkd gel a vaniarlce 6on a ti.ig h en 6 ig n . I thaniz you {pan youh cansidenat o i. stncen:eky, Rbnakd L. RingXirtg ` Pne.6 ident Mapxewaad Hotex Conpanation R LR/ c6 I Community Design Review Board --9- Minutes 9-26-89 17. External speakers shall be directed away from re idential areas and the sound shall not exceed 50 cibel.s (normal conversation level) at the resi ntial property line. 180 The wid ning of the westerly curb cut along Cope Avenue i not permitted. 19. The statio hours shall conform to existing code. 20. The vents for the underground fuel tanks shall be at least 200 feet from t1, residential district to the west. The `City Council may approveprove a lesser setback if the developer, %can prove that the typography.or exi "sting or proposed buildings will prevent fumes from reaching a residential lot line. 21. Approval of a conditional use permit by the City Council for the expans,'on of a nonconformin g use. 22 If a drive -up telephone is to be replaced on the property, it shall be lo ated away from the adjacent residential prop'igrty. . One shall not be used if its location would interfere with traffic circulation. 23. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does no,` constitute approval of.a building permit. 24. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form Qeptable to stastaff, , In the amount of 150% of th estimated cost of any site improveme is that are not completed by occul_)(.ii c:y . The appl' ant shall also provide staff with proper document tion, to be approved by the City Attorne which.allows staff access onto the propert to finish work that may not be completed. Boardmembe Molin seconded Ayes -- -all VI. DESIGN REVIEW Al Sign Variance - Days Inn - 1780 E. County Road D Ron Ringling, owner of the Days Inn, asked the Board to consider the poor location and financial problems of the Days Inn when considering this pylon sign height variance - request. 1,1r. Ringling said they have had numerous complaints from businesses when their guests Community Design Review Board -10- Minutes 9-26-89 are unable to locate Days Inn. Mr. Ringling discussed with board members other.iocations which may be favorable for. signage for his hotel. Boardmember'Molin moved denial of the request by the Days Inn for a 50 -.foot sign height variance to increase their pylon sign height to 100 feet, on the basis that: 1. Strict enforcement of the code would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. The circumstance, being the lack of freeway frontage is not a unique problem for this site, but shared by many properties 2, The applicant's dilemma of lack of freeway visibility was created by the original developer by building on a site that does not have the. exposure desired for a motel. 3. This property is being put to a reasonable use under the conditions allowed by the official controls. 4. According to state statute, economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the. property exists under the terms of the ordinance Boardmember Anitzberger seconded Ayes- -Moe, Mol in , Anitzberger Nays -- Erickson Holder VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS VIII.BOARD PRESENTATIONS IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS X. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m. ction by council Endorsers odifi ed..; MEMORANDUM Rej -d TO: City Manager Date, FROM Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CDRB Appeal LOCATION: 2271 White Bear Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Joseph L. Fleming PROJECT TITLE: Fleming's Service Center DATE October 13, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION James and Marion Glassel, of 1775 East Lark Avenue,. are appealP gtheCommunityDesignReviewBoard's approval of the Flemin g Service Center site remodel. The proposal is to redevelop the existing fuel station with a new facility that would include a convenience store two express lube bays, four regular service'' ba g y s a car wash and fuel islands. (Refer to their-letter on page 3.) BACKGROUND On.September.26,.1989, the Review Board approved plans for this. project and recommended approval of a conditional use permit See pages 12 -14.) The Board recommended that the existing driveway to Lark Street next to Mr. and Mrs. Glassel's property be allowed to remain, . but that it be screened from their view by a decorative wood fence. ORDINANCE PROVISION Subsection 25 -65 (b) provides that the Review Board's decision shall be final, unless appealed to the City Council by the applicant, City Staff or any affected erson within ten days afterpYtheBoard's decision. DISCUSSION The following is in response to Mr. and Mrs. GlasselIs concerns:., 1. The 20 -foot- setback requirement, mentioned in the gnei hbor -- hood survey.on page 5, referred to a parking lot /drive lane setback variance that the applicant had requested when he first made application. The plan has since been revised. The approved site plan complies with all setback requirements. The 20- foot - setback rule does not pertain to.the existingdiagonaldrivewayatthesouthwestcornerofthesitewhich is on County right- -o f -way . ' 2.. The design and placement of the fence is subject to Staff approval. Code subsection - " pP coon 9 3 (6) requires that fences shall. be constructed and maintained in a workmanlike manner." These requirements would provide a safeguard against an inadequate fence design and maintenance problems. 3. The site plan is inaccurate in showing of the existing catch basin within the driveway to Lark Avenue. This catch basin is actually in the grass between Mr. Fleming's andthe Glassel's driveways Regardless of this, the grading and drainage plan was required by the. Board to be subject to the City Engineer's approval. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the City Engineer must. approve this plan. An additional condition of approval, however, may be warranted that would require Mr. Fleming to verify that the existing catch basin west of his building is connected to the storm sewer. If it is not, the proper repairs should be made. 4 The petition beginning on page 6 did not have any influence in the Board's approval of this project. The Board felt that the drive should remain since it is already existing and there was not sufficient evidence demonstrating that this driveway was, -a nuisance. The Board, furthermore, required the extension of the screening fence toward the south to provide better screening of this driveway. RECOMMENDATION Condition 7 of the Design Review Board's motion shall be revised by, adding the requirement that "Mr. Fleminq shall verify that the existing catch basin west of his building is connected to the storm sewer. If it is not, the proper repairs should be made." No other changes to the Board's motion are recommended. TEFLEMING3 Attachments 1 Letter of appeal dated October 6, 1989 20 Applicant's Petition date.stamped September 21, 1989 3& CDRB minutes dated September. 2 6, 1989, 2 PAGE 1 Appeal: Flemings Service Station 1JAMESANDMARIONGLASSEL. 1775 EAST LARK AVENUE .- MAPLEWOOD t MN 55109 777 7393 October 69 1909 1111ap l ewood C1, ty. . Staff 1 G30 E. County Road B Map 1. ewood , 111\J 55109 Gent 1 e men This letter is to ' app a1 the Community Design Review Board's approval of September 26, 19899 regarding the expansion plans for. Fl.eming's Service Station. We wish to have this issue reopened for the following reasons 1.. The drive to Lank Avenue does not meet code It is not 20 feet from our property, and at one spot it is only 9 feet from our dr- 1 VP was or i g i na l l y brought up by Tom Fkstrand i. n h i s iEst;tC-''r ca f' .1i_ily (: 1909 tC0p.y attachead) . Since then, the matter has been ignored, and it must be addressed before approva 1 i s g i ven. E? 1P Regar d 1 e,;s of the status of the driveway, a privacy fence wi l 1 be L)u i l t the two properties. We have no assurance regarding the quality of the proposed fence, only that the material is. to be rcaugh cedar. " We find that many other fences in the community are very unsightly, mostly because they are of poor quality and have' been poorly maintained. A fence such as the one between the Keller Lake Menards Lumber and their neighbors would be satisfactory. A statement requiring regular maintenance by the station should also be included 1 n the plans. The posit i on i ng of the fence is also of concern. We want a definite placement of the fence before the board gives their approval to this plan. We spoke with the developer about the fence and he agreed to do whatever we fe l.t was necessary, i nc l ud i ng moving the driveway. He has now backed down on this, and obviously roes .not want to spend any money to do the job-in an aesthetically pleasing manner. 3. Curbing was promised along the existing driveway by the developer. This i.s . necessary to insure that the water runoff from the Flemming 1_)r- opc-'r- t:y aloes not flow onto our property as it has done in the past. Ttic- j existing catch basin shown on the Plan i s not on the driveway as shown. Furthermore, an existing catch basin on the Fleming properr ty allegedly is not even connected to the storm sewer system. ]"'he entire drainage plan must be reexamined and these issues resolved in writing to insure that Fleming does not back, 3 Attachment 1 a 1 : Flemings Service Station dawn on his commitment. He is already stating that these i ssues ar E-r c_olar) t,y Problems. L+ . We did not have a copy of the recommendations at the last meeting held can September 26, 1989 , which included a petition to keep the drive oper`r . As a result we were unable to comment on it. Af ter exarrr i n t: i o1 of this petition, it is c l ear. that it proves our point that this r_orrier is I1.mproperly being used. for business traffic. 4rrrt.) 1 frig shows that the petition includes names from areas tt t Crave no reason whatever to use this access. Some *.of these )games are from streets such as Cope Avenue, White Bear Aver--1UP_ , i -ie- — ;ab i Avenue, Highway 61 north of Highway Sb, . Sherren Avc ?ntac= -3 , I iowsa - r - d st i-eet , and German Street. White Pear and Cope Avenue adrir esses, of course , a l ready have direct. access to Flemming s station. All the others mentioned would b.e forced to cross either White Bear, or Cope Avenues to use the Lark Avenue access. Furthermore, there are, signatures from the cities of Rosevi l lei W ate B r Lake, North St. Paul, and Shoreview. it i s hard to understand why these individuals would drive so far out of their way to use the Lark Avenue access., Another. problem with the petition is that many of the names do not have complete addresses. As a result 9, we have no way of verifying these I 3 T)e f- i n -i 1 .l y , one of the addresses listed is 1775 Lark Avenue. This is OUR address . We d i d no t sign the petition and the person named does riot live here. If t:h i E -. t i t: ion has had any i 11 f l U n c e on the dcls i. gn board's der_• i s i ori, we ask that they take a closer look at i t . In summary, we ask that the Community Design Review Board revoke their- approval of this building plan. Sincerely, L James n: i-rd Marion G 1 arse l M CITY ul t 1AP1,.E.W00,.D 183 0 E COUNTY RO. D B 11APLEWOOD, h1INNE5C YTA 55109 FFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G 12.770-4'560 r• - -' -_ - - - - -- _ - rrrr..r.rrl wrrrwrrr.rr 11r1 James P• & Marion Gl asset 1775 Lark Ave. Date: July 6, 1989 Map lewood, MN 55109 NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY This survey is to get your opinion on an application the.City has received to develop property in your neighborhood. The application is for the remodeling of Fleming Service and gas stations. The.present building would be removed, and a new station with a car wash and service stalls would be built. A setback variance is required since the building 'would only be 32 feet from the residential zone to the west (code requires 50 feet) and the parking lot /drive lane would be 5feet from the west lot line (code requires 20 feet), See the enclosed maps.) The applicant i's Joe Fleming. Your opinion is needed to assist the City staff and Planning Commission in pre- p I ari.ng a recommendation to the City Council. Once this survey is completed, you will be notified of any public hearings. Please indicate your opinion and comments below and return only this cover letter and any attachments on which you have written), to me in the enclosed postage — paid envelope by July 17, 19890 If you would like further information, please call me at 770 -4560 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Thank you for . your . comments. . They will be given careful consideration. TOM EKSTRAND — ASSOCIAT PLANNER BK Enclosure(s) I am in favor of this proposal because T hn%lc no comment. I object to this proposal because If you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this project acceptable. If no changes would make it acceptable, how should this property be developed? c See oth.er side 7 PROJECT: Flemin 's Service Use reverse side if' m ' s ) more room s needed. 5 i s 21 19 r t r F'ETITION IN FAVOR OF KEEPING DRIVEWAY FROM PROSPERITY AVEm INTO ; FLEMING'S AUTO SERVICE NAME OF STREET SIG ATURE 000 • t clti r pe 1 t , r G L cr u 1 -- -- A-0/ L f f t E fft1 EI iJ S t Attachm nt 27 L G r pA' k r i PETITION IN FAVOR OF KEEPING DRIVEWAY FROM PROSPERITY AVE. INTO ; F1' MI NQ' S AUTO SERVICE lb NAME OF STREET SIGNATURE 00 3 c_ t Y4 oilr M 4 r r t Y ZT clX01AI r 14-( o r N CWky\ r PETITION IN FAVOR OF KEEPING DRIVEWAY FROM FFiOSFERITY AVE. INTO FLEMiNO'B AUTO 8ERVICE NAME OF STREET SIGNATL' ° mew- s. 1 3 Y cc; CtZ2 m2Sctib * v c 12u oc'c Eli n Sher S5/ /3 /t•`- 30 / 4P/:.C oc m lrJs/0 C E 0 as(45 3 3-ye ljqyo o t OIL c4ecoew i i PETI TI.ON I N FAVOR . OF KEEPING DRIVEWAY FROM PROSPERITY AVE. FLEM I NG 5 AUTO SERVICE , NAME OF STREET SIGNATURE: 1/5 III's 4CL bsc. c l .- 27 Rct 64tiz sw dh r s t vvt C Z 3 7s Zzz, 7 l6B 3s "g7 INTO 70/ Sl,G, i'-^J CGiu- l t.YZ y c, ,Du ie/ Aj7 wvo l te W t 0 r\j, rff7l ix 1 t Yn o wcL n1l SS o q m.ss,ti m.a -P w m i 1 ltwovo co YlAA PC S 0 9 h 1k 9 Iloor mets S oru 3L w 2/oo3 low, Lou IY17 zz e,21 i.,t e 170/ E . Co aA,E z4z, W',,:Je Bey kve poba pro.5(eh i o, 1. h 1 Q eas¢h Ave-% 10 NAME OF STREET SI,GNATURE 1751 E . fi e- t 3D 7Y( c oll Z 76G H 3G z33 cr4:5 tC lee 1w 7344 r cil 2a Cash -1e O1S r K z2...7 2 J -i • 14,l-7zk" Si. 12 Community Design Review Board -6- Minutes 9- 26--89 prop6rty to finish work that may not be completed. 24. Three speed bumps shall be placed on the driveway from Cope Avenue as shown on the "phasing" plan. This driveway shall have a sign ,pit the Cope. Avenue curb cut. reading "Service Drive Only" A "No Exit" sign shall be posted at .the north end of this drive near the building/to discoura e exitsg g to Cope Avenue. ' 25. A three and one half foo sidewalk shall be installed along the rear, of the building. 26. Roof vents shall b'e a color to match buildin g roof. as much .as possible`,; Roof vents shall be consolidated as near, as possible along the common walls to limit the number of vents. 270 The "phase I diagonal driveway" shall be eliminated. Boardmember Holder /seconded Boardmember Ericson moved the motion be amended to include No. 28./- Grading plan s bj ect to staff approval. Boardmember of in , Ayes--all The moti as amended was voted on. Ayes- -all B. Site Redevelopment - Fleming's Service Center 2271 White Bear Avenue Bob Fields, representing the applicant, discussed the revised plans with the board members. Mr. Fields displayed pictures of a new product called brick block,` which would be used on the upper portion of the building on top of the three feet of rock block, which would be used on the bottom portion of the building. Mr. Fields asked that they be allowed to use a cedar fence material on the roof screening to accomplish continuity with the entire building. Mr. Fields asked that consideration be given to the hours of operation for this proposal, since it was reviewed in advance of the newly .revised fuel ordinance, and he asked that the requirement for a conditional use permit be eliminated. Mr. Fields also asked that Condition 22, relating to the elimination of the driveway to Lark Avenue, be deleted since he felt 13 Attachment 3 Community Design Review Board -7-- Minutes 9-26-89 that this would result in becoming a condition of the conditional use permit. Mr. Fields said they would install speed bumps or signage for the driveway to accommodate the adjoining property owner. Mr. Fields said new curbing and catch basins would be' installed.which should prevent the neighbor's property from experiencing any flooding problems. Cheryl Glassel, speaking for. James Glassel of 1775 Uirl Avenue, said they are concerned about vehicle lights shining into Mr.. Gl.assel's residence and she asked that the driveway be removed. Ms. Glassel also asked for details. on the proposed trash enclosures. Ms.-Glassel said she wanted to go on record as being against any hours of operation after 10 p.m. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the site plan date - stamped September 61 1989, and building elevations and landscape plans date- stamped August 11, 1989, for Fleming's Service Center at 2271 White Bear Avenue, subject to the following conditions 1. All trash dumpsters shall be.stored in screening enclosures with a 1004 opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material to match the building. The design, placement and size of the enclosure shall be subject to staff approval. No refuse, old tires or waste of any kind shall be kept outside of the enclosure. Any enclosure for the storage of tires shall be kept,locked. 2. Any exterior building or roof- mounted equipment shall be decoratively screened and hidden from view and be subject to Board approval. 3. Parking areas shall be striped with a "hairpin" design and all bituminous areas shall have continuous concrete curbing. Non -grass bumper overhangs that are at least 2.5 feet wide shall be provided as required by code for all 15.'5-foot- deep parking stalls. Parking lots shall be kept in a continual state of repair. 4. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, Board review shall be repeated. 5. Site lighting shall be provided. All outdoor illumination shall.be downlighted so as to prevent undue glare from being directly visible on any adjacent street or on property that is used or Community.Design Review Board -8-- Minutes 9-26-89 planned for residential use. No light source shall be directly visible from any residential area or public street and light levels shall not exceed one foot - candle at a residential property line. 6. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due to construction of the site, that property:shall be.restored and irons replaced by the applicant. 7. Grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plans shall be.subject to the City Engineer's approval. 8.. All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. 949 The screening fence shall be revised for staff approval to be extended along the west side of the Lark Avenue driveway. 10, Reflectorized stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided. 1a. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this, construction shall be restored and resodded. 120 Proper building addresses shall be installed, subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal. 13. Signage if not part of this approval. Sign proposals shall be approved by staff, unless City Council or Review Board approval is required. 140 The sidewalk along White Bear Avenue shall taper to meet the driveway grade.at the new driveway crossing. 15. The building shall have an exterior on all four sides of brick- shaped concrete block.: The color shall be an earthtone resembling natural brick. The flat concrete block fascia proposed on the south and east sides of the building shall be, replaced with a fluted concrete block, colored to be compatible with the building. 160 An inground sprinkling system shall be installed for all landscaped areas. 15 Community Design Review Board -9 -- Minutes. 9 -2 6--89 17. External speakers shall be directed away from residential areas and the sound shall not exceed 50 decibels (normal conversation level) at the residential property line. 180 The widening of the westerly curb cut along Cope Avenue is not permitted. 19. The station hours shall conform to existing code. 20 The vents for the underground fuel tanks shall-be at least 200 feet from the residential district to the west. The City Council may approve a lesser setback if the developer can prove that the typography or existing or proposed buildings will prevent fumes from reaching a residential lot line. 21. Approval of a conditional use permit by the City Council for the expansion of a nonconforming use. 22. If a drive -up telephone is to be replaced on the property, it shall be located away from the adjacent residential property. One shall not be used if its location would interfere with traffic circulation 23. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not constitute approval of a building permit. 240 The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. The applicant .shall also provide staff with proper documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney, which allows staff access onto the property to. finish work that may not be completed. Boardmember Molin seconded Ayes- -all VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Sign Variance d\- Da s nn 1780 E. County Road D Ron Ringling, wn r of the Days Inn, asked the Board to consider the p oYz location and financial problems of the Days Inn w1ien.considering this pylon sign height variance re test. Mr. Ringling said they have had numerous laints from businesses when their guests MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 2271 White Bear Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Joseph L.. Fleming PROJECT TITLE Fleming's Service Center DATE: October 11, 198'9 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 10 The applicant is requesting approval of. a conditional use permit (CUP) to redevelop his fuel station with a new facility including:.a convenience store, two express lube bays, four regular service bays, a car wash and fuel islands. 2. The recently adopted -fuel station ordinance prohibits fuel stations and repair garages within 350 feet of residential districts This makes the station a nonconforming use. A CUP, is required to expand a nonconforming use BACKGROUND Code Requirements Subsection 36 -151 (2.i.3.) states that in a BC district, major fuel stations or public garages shall not be permitted within 350 feet of areas planned for residential use in the City s land use plan. Subsection 36 -17 (e) states that no existing building or premises devoted to a use not permitted in the.district in which such building or premises is located shall be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered, unless 1. Required by law or government order; or 2. There would not.be a significant affect, as determined by the City through a conditional use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. Design Review Board Action On September 26, 1989, the Review Board approved plans for this project and recommended approval of the CUP. The Board recommended that the existing driveway to Lark Street be allowed to remain, but must be screened from the neighbor's view by a decorative wood fence. The question of this driveway being allowed to remain was. the neighbors main contention concerning this proposal. DISCUSSION Staff finds no reason to deny the CUP. The site plan proposes to place the fuel pumps and building further away. from the adj acent home lessening any potential nuisance from the fuel service activity. The proposed screening fence, furthermore, would provide an additional buffer to the.existing hedge. The grading would correct an existing drainage problem RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the enclosed resolution on.page 11, approvin g a conditional use permit to redevelop a fuel station and repair garage at 2271 White Bear Avenue, based on the conditions required by ordinance. Approval is subject to the following conditions; Adherence to the site plan date stamped September 6, 19890 2. This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of .approval, based on.the procedures in City code. 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff mailed surveys to the 31 property owners within 350 feet for their comments regarding this, proposal Of the twelve replies, one had no comment, five were in favor and six objected. It should be noted that these survey rep-lies were submitted Prio r to, the revised-site-Plan which eliminates all variances. In Favor Comments 1. I am in favor because it looks as though they have it well landscaped and attractive. 29 It,is a better looking station with better business for the area. A good improvement for the City. 3, It provides more service to our employees (Specialty Engineering),, 40 Look more modern, make more jobs,, be more competitive with big oil who take profits and pay some exec in some other state $1,000,000. Objections 1. Meet the present code. 2 Refer to the letter on page 8. Staff reply: Item 4 -- The City Council. originally required the installation of a fence, but did not state where. The fencing was not shown as part of the landscape plan on file. 3. We do not need another car wash. We do not need another gas station. They.are building a large one on B and White Bear Avenue. Would like to see Lark.be on a cul -de -sac as we were promised years ago, What are rules and laws f or, if they are not followed. 4. While support Fleming's business, the surrounding property should be preserved. 5. No objection to improving the property, but oppose the driving lane variances. I object because of code variances. I am in favor if no variances in driving lanes. b. Refer to the letter.on page 9. I' F 3 REFERENCE Site Description 1 Site s l*ze,: 1, 19 acres 2. Existing Land Use. Fleming's Service Center Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Cope Avenue and McDonald's Restaurant Southerly: White Bear Avenue, Prosperity Avenue and Realty'World Ea,sterlyo. White Bear Avenue Westerly Single dwelling and the Ramsey. Clinic Medical Center Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: SC, Service Commercial 20, Zoning: BC, Business Commercial FLEMING2 Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan Survey response dated July 18, 1989 5. Survey response dated July 25, 1989 60 Applicant's Petition date stamped September 21, 1989 7* Resolution N LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment , N IU POND1 KONL.MANc"j AV W KOHLMAN AV x W i co U tzo 23 T 29N.R22w p i Cr t; Cr W W EDG ENILL RD 10 11 1 uv' w z 1) CONNOR Ay 2 D E M01YT 4 A V I- m 0 g u r- BROOKS AV a ELE a SEXTANT AV XTAN T AV r AV a GERVAIS GERVAIS AV d GRANOVIEW 2 AV _ w Co VIKING OR Y TLE AV VL 3 H R R N z Knuckle Neo ohe AY CT COPE AV w- - = COPE _ AV w E K AV w Q Ir LARK N1 N in 3 LAURIE cc Y w u LA rilE NO R0 SANG- HURST Cr z AV n t n z W Y CO AD P C- E AV BURKE 0 1 m ELORIOG E AV C, r- j S p A QW) W BEL A f ISKILLMAN AV r f KA R RAVcrC.-) Q 5 u QQ° 4 Q': S F,<>0 D / AV S AV tN RY- N AJ Sr" V, a N P a D W a I S ME R AV W a SUM E f, W Qt' Y Cr HE AV 1 S o Cr W 12i o Al C Q a 4A X a 4 m RIPLEY C.) AZ o z x i iC L. 3 Y a K I NCi S T O N AV w HIA Ilk AV ' Cf AV w o LliK ZtJ a PRICEa i W w a 2 g Cr NTEUR AV m LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment , N en a n , I + y t4T• ?1A 11 .rO 34 •? `f I 9 . Aw.1 fir•- fit- - -- - l.c - - ts- ,,r {' •,fir -' - JI _ r coy QzRA C) 3 N 4% 3 - INSO i C1 : }:: r i -Y. 0 2 r2 . S i 1r t • (6-27T) t2 e 5T « > tea' Z t _ j (% &J o f fn L fint let 00 43 7 , LARK 84 r4 Nt "1 9 C — -us S_ ; — 61 1;,, pn 9 - ` Z P ^ 1 a n 13 _ C 47 y 1"50 two 91W fin 2 iZU. , 3 q t J 75 - +s - rl r i (• fzoi 1 C t L •t to m bf%z 67 i.0 14A.J DOG t ®9 tz .j Z .4 V A, z r— I TIN ell 01 2-) 4t Q- k -Q Z- St iL. t- zl i 20 _ zZ7 c.s VA' zes 4 •: _ yACa7Ea- - - •.,j _DOC. °z 1-,z1(V o o zo _ W 6 Z ac, is ^ Igl A '^ r VAC poi 4' _- - S A N D H t x4.9 l a c. 020U21 ; in , Z n z , t n-70 4 r'. 41 b i p) n < ,Q11- . _ Z — — — — — -- -- — p AC Q V mop 04 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 Fn i C01' L AYE 277VO , L)n51ux; cut'b Cut t,i I x; c x.ti .Ur in • 6' CLx+c ltiDtCN. 6 i 00 loom, bE 1 P ovd. / -0- / If 4 410 NEW SIATIOlYSTOIZE . Ce 17 -0' AL ECiUll, 1 8Ux 5EE DE r AIL 6. Cuic nwM dip 1 riow t HIGH 6' L tIC 1 lvplCA- r., I SMEN ,,,,... .... , ...Y FENCE of i 39 )i p1?I,EwAi Rit1Jv ExIS1 irx; 5,167 .` p/* tub Cul S SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 N I ob ' ec t to this proposal. because: is Noise and trash are already a. problem. This proposal will reswl t in additional noise, conglomeration of flying papers, dirty rags, oil cans, tires, etc.. 20 The Ramsey Clinic to the north extends the entire width of our lot with a setback of only 17 or 18 feet. I.f the proposal materializes; the east side w i l l also c lose in on our property, thus further devaluating our home. 3. Access to the sta.t i on from Lark and Prosperity has been permitted by the City of Clap l ewood . It was not i n the Ramsey County plans when White Bear Avenue was. improved, nor was it wanted by them. it has resulted in an area of speeding automob i l.es and an abundance of trash. 4. We were promised a -screening fence when the station was built. It never materialized. The existing 10' high hedge shown on the map was planted by us and is on our property. When we retire, we may wish to remove it for more garden space. 5. IF CODES ARE NOT ENFORCED, THEY ARE MEANINGLESS. The way.-this property.should be deve I o ed is Within the codes.' 20 Remove the drive from Lark and Prosperity. The intersec- tion of Lark, Prosperity and White Bear Avenue was closed to prevent traffic from entering White Bear Avenue at this busy and dangerous area. 31 Install the screening fence we were promised. 4. Provide adequate drainage. We wi l 1 no longer tolerate flooding of our - basement because of water draining from Flemings parking -lot and Lark Avenue. JUL 1 8 117" 8 Attachment 4 l Attachi ent 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Joseph L. Fleming initiated a conditional use permit to expand his service station at the following - described property: Registered Land Survey Number 258, Tract B This. property is also known.as 2271 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional -use permit is as follows: 11 This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on 198 The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be 20 The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 198 Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to.be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above - described conditional use.permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of- -fact: 10 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. 20 The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 30 The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 17 Attachment 7 6. The use would be.served by. adequate public facilities and services , including streets , pol ice and fire protection, drainage structures, water and.sewer systems, schools and parks. 1 710 The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use.would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 100 There would. not be a significant -a f f ect on the development of the parcel as zoned Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated September 6, 198.90 I 2, This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of. approval, based on the procedures in City code. Adopted this day of 19890 tff:] Planning Commission 6 Minutes 10-2-89 La on, Sigmundik, Sletten D. Conditional Use Permit: 2271 White Bear Avenue Fleming) Secretary Olson presented the staff report for this requested conditional use permit to redevelop a.fuel station with a new facility including: a convenience store, two express Tube bays four regular service bays, a car wash and fuel islands. A commissioner asked whether the fuel storage tanks had been inspected for compliance to pollution requirements. Joe Fleming, the applicant, said the tanks were installed in 1973 and soils testing was done in the past. Mr. Fleming said that some contamination was found and all of the tanks will be replaced at this time. Chairman Axdahl asked for comments- r r -oi t.,IIc" public There were no comments. Mr. Fleming said the addition of catch basins on the curb lines should prevent . any flooding problems on the neighbors' property. Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution approving a conditional use permit for a fuel station and.repair garage at 2271 White Bear Avenue, based on the conditions required by ordinance. Approval is subject to the i ul l owing conditions: 10 Adherence to the site plan date- stamped September 6, 19890 2. This permit shall be subject to review after one year f r oin the cute of a prov<a 1 , t >-Y:c d on the procedures in City code. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes --- Axdcalzl , Barrett, Cardinal Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten 19 w s Fi F- $ Action by Council MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO: City Manager ®f3ed FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner fie• SUBJECT : Conditional Use Permit ee LOCATION: 2207 McAfee Circle Date APPLICANT/OWNER: Scott and Julie Hoffman. DATE. September 26, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Request The applicant has applied for a conditional use ermit in orderrder toconstruct.a deck into the required setback along County 'Road B. Reason for the Request Section.36 -70 of the City-Code states "A conditional use e ' p rmit may be given to construct an addition to a single dwellingg when such addition, or part thereof, extends into a minimum setback." The corner of the garage which would abut the proposed deck is thin feet from the property line along Count RoadYgy B. The position of the house in relation to County Road B is such thatthe, corner of the proposed deck, if aligned with the side of the garage, would encroach ten feet into the required thirty foot setback. Thus a conditional use permit is required to constructthedeckonthesouthsideofthehouseasproposed DISCUSSION The home has a sliding glass door and a 2 x 12 deck ledger boardOard on the south side in anticipation of a deck being added. The addition of a deck on the south side of the house would not ' hinder traffic visibility, depreciate property values or cause adverse environmental effects. In fact, the deck as p lanned will incorporate the site's existing features into its design. One concern with this property that was raised ,by three of the surrounding property owners ' Y • g P p y was that the grass in the ditch area of County Road B has not been kept mowed. The Environmental Health Officer will investigate this complaint, RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution on page 9 approvin g a conditional use permit for the constructionuction of a deck in the required setback for 2207 McAfee Circle subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the submitted plans, dated August 18 1989g , unless a change is approved by City staff. o V ' 0 0 u 0 E 0 e° m o u m 0 0 o ao E E Rrin 1pal 11 er a1 I k L h Almon AVI IRL` tor- 7---B W. j M ; X, minmin Onrl©rlai NAM 0 SHERWOOD GLEN LAND USE PLAN a MMM ATTACHMENT 1 4 N t © m ao Q Q C _ W cc m L SHERWOOD GLEN LAND USE PLAN a MMM ATTACHMENT 1 4 N j PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 5 ATTACHMENT 2 202 r SITE PLAN 6 J u v z ATTACHMENT 3 8 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT ATTACHMENT 5 fir. c i '•I .. I V { ' ` • ' .. . pZA eduu5 b C VIC G b A o -- --• e Pu 6Lt c_ r, i _ t` bL V l -lam' pp TIE c ran t t- c bew (AAInTfA iran - , s 5oz r\ce 8 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT ATTACHMENT 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Scott and Julie Hoffman initiated a conditional use permit to construct a deck in the required setback at 2207 McAfee Circle; This property is also known as Lot 17, Block One, Cave. s English Street Addition, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 21 1989, The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on October 23, 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an Opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the. following findings -of -fact: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, r{ constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not ' change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous hazardous detrimental disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any, person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -Off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other ii nuisances. 5. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire p rotection drainage structures water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 9 ATTACHMENT 6 The use would not create excessive.additional costs for public facilities,or services. The use would maximize thepreservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the.development design. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Adherence.to the site plan, dated August 18,'1989, unless a change is approved by City staff. Approval of all building plans and issuance of.an building permit'by the building inspector prior to the start of construction. No permanent walls or roof shall be permitted with the deck in the setback encroachment area. , The storage area under the deck shall not be heated and shall not be used for living space, unless approved by the City building official. No lighting shall be permitted which glares or shines on the public right-of-way. This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City code. Adopted this day o f 10 1 1989, 2- 40 The storage area under the deck shall not be heated and shall not be used for living space, unless approved by the City building official. 5. No lighting shall be permitted which gLares or shines on the public right-of-way. 640 This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval, based oii the procedures in the City code. Planning Commission. -3-- Minutes 10- 2-89 Commissioner Cardinal seconded. Ayes-- Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten Be Alley Vacation and Preliminary Plat: Sheryl's Addition Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report for this. requested preliminary plat for seven single - dwelling lots and the vacation of ar?-unused alley. Donald Campbell, surveyor and representing the applicant, said the grading on this site was done in con j unction with another project and the final g racking is complete at this time Mr. Campbell said they would comply with all.of the conditions of /the staff recommendation. Commissioner Fischer moved the P16tnning Commission recommend:. 141 Approval of the resolution to vacate the alley between German and Ari.el,,',Streets., south of Cope Avenue. Approval is in the public interest because: a. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. b. This alley segment is not needed for area traffic circulation or emergency vehicle access. c. The alley right -of -way is not needed and Maplewood's policy has been to vacate alley rights -of --way whenever possible. 2. Approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following onditions being satisfied before final plat appr al: a. App oval of the final grading, drainage and er sion control plans by the City Engineer. b. The grading plan shall include a proposed uilding pad elevation and contour information for each home site. Hous i.nq styles shall be illustrated which Iliinimize q. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager. Mods f 0 ed...., FROM Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rejected SUBJECT Conditional Use Permit and Parking Date Authorization :4 LOCATION. 13 57 . Cope Avenue APPLICANT /OWNERS: Sue and Tom Hope PROJECT TITLE: Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center Addition DATE: October 11, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1. The applicants are requesting approval of a conditional use permit. for a 3,066- square -foot addition proposed on the front of the Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center. This new space would provide support services for the soccer facility. such as a store, office, lounge and snack bar. A CUP is required since the addition would be within 350 feet of the residential district to the south. 2 City Council authorization for 151 fewer parking spaces is also requested. Cade requires 257 spaces; 106 are currently, provided. No additional spaces are proposed with this addition. BACKGROUND When the building was approved, City Code required a CUP for any construction within 200 feet of a residential district. A CUP was not required then since the building was placed over 200 feet back from the residential district to the south. Code now requires a CUP if.the construction would be closer that 350 feet to a residential district. PARKING REQUIREMENT Section 36-22(a)(6) requires that there be one parkin g spaceace for each 200 square feet, or portion thereof, of floor area for recreational uses. CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL Section 36 -442 requires that in order to approve a CUP, findings one through nine, as listed in the resolution on page 12, must be made. DISCUSSION (CUP, parking authorization, and liquor license) Staff finds no problem with the proposed addition's proximity to the residential district to the south. The addition would only be eight feet closer to the street than the existing building, which is 202 feet back from the center line of Cope Avenue (the residential boundary.) This would not have any negative effect or .impact on the appearance of the .building. The parking ordinance requires that the applicant provide over twice the number of stalls presently.in place. Staff feels that an authorization for the 157 fewer Spaces should be approved since the proposed addition is. for support services for soccer games and, therefore, should not significantly increase the need for.more parking. Also, there have not been any traffic problems reported. The ordinance, furthermore, is too general Code requires this ratio for all recreational uses, whether the use is billiard hall, video arcade, bowling alley or, in this case, an indoor soccer center. Staff would recommend that if a parking problem develops the applicant should restripe the parking lot with 9.5- foot -wide stalls for customers and 9- foot -wide stalls for employees, which the new parking code allows. The primary .objection to this proposal is over the requested liquor license, not the building expansion. Approval of the CUP should be conditioned upon prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages. There are presently no liquor establishments located across from residential homes that would cause noise and.traffic problems for homeowners. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approval of a conditional use permit for one year for a building setback of 190 feet from the adjacent residential district for an indoor soccer-center at 1357 Cope Avenue, based on the findings required by code and since the proposed addition would only be eight feet closer to the front lot line than the existing building. Approval is subject to the following conditions: as, Adherence to the site plan, date stamped August 21, 1989, . b. There shall not.be any sale of alcoholic beverages. 20 Approval of a parking authorization for 151 fewer parking spaces, based on the following: a. There have not been any complaints received indicating parking problems at the Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center; b. The proposed addition would not be a significant traffic generating use, but only a-support area for the facility. C. A large part of the area is soccer field. 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff mailed surveys to the 26. property owners within 350 feet for their comments regarding this proposal. of the eleven replies, four were in favor, one had no comment and six objected I am in favor, except for the alcoholic beverages. We have our share. of speeding autos on Cope Ave. now. We do not need the alcohol with it object ions i. We question the fact.-that alcoholic beverages need to be sold at Corner Kick. 20 I am opposed to selling alcoholic beverages on.the site. I believe it will increase traffic and parking problems because the patrons will not leave. the site after the game. If the sale of alcoholic beverages was dropped from the proposal - I would not object to it. 3.0 There is currently a noise and traffic problem that develops during soccer indoor season. This is due to younger people drinking in the parking lot after their recreation. Reckless driving, burning rubber, speeding out of the area. I Object to the Liquor License!!,' Consider the environment of the residents affected. Staff reply: The Director of Public Safety has stated that there have not been any traffic or parking problems reported. 4. This is a. recreational facility not a liquor lounge - Enough, g traffic and noise as it is! Not very controlled as to speed limit! 5. It will promote more late night traffic and increased loitering in the parking lot after games. our only real objection is the serving of alcohol on the premises, 6. Refer to the letter beginning on page 10. 4 REFERENCE Site Size - 3.6. acres u rrou nd i nq Land Uses Northerly: Highway 36 Southerly: Cope Avenue and single dwellings Easterly: Abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad line Westerly: Proposed English Place Shopping Center site Past Action September 18, 1984: The Community Design Review Board approved plans for the soccer center. September 12, 1989: 1 The Community Design Review Board approved plans for the proposed addition and recommended.approval of the CUP Planning 1. Land Use Plan designation: LSC, Limited Service Commercial 20 Zoning: M -1, Light Manufacturing 3. Section 36 -187 (b) of the M -1 district regulations states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted within 3503 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit. 7 ,l TESOCCUP Attachments 1. Sherwood Glen Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3, Site Plan 4. Applicant's Statement of Purpose dated August 2, 1989 5 Neighbor's survey response 60 Resolution 7. Plans date stamped August 21, 1989 (separate attachment ) 5 i r Q _ o V o 411111, a u o Eo -- o E r. r E B W 'S'` to ei.hen a ....c # flllo IPs1_ r er ei ,_ i =- 491 - 1 h . Yw T" t,ch - 9._ _._ , 1 t 1 LsC tiSC h nM w _ L .. a . ! • 1d t ' Tt C r f a tor' ric alts a . ' n`i' •` -- `l d t ON KX 0 p 1 of S C .._....... i o 05 • ti m n r" at I Of 181 dMI N o b. 0 W m m . r L SHEnWOOD GLEN.. LAND USE PLAN Attachment 1 6 Q N f Sc zoo dob•' i 1 f l zz ac r; 3 S3' • w J•I. 111 0 Yom.: .. : ti. ,•,;/vf.1 /. '% i' . ^.' •,, C C R'WJ KICK NDOOR SOCCER CENTER • 7S ,... , ti s 37' .3 ss,s • lq 14 i . T.0 iS iv h 42 S S 3 r: _ 1 W 134.8 13. 4 D D.1 18 1324 1332 7 elk i0•0a S9•, p 10 a g Z Li1 F Iz 13 3 14 Moo ,O+ 7 B o 6 a 3 z 2t 23 1 7 elk i0•0a S9•, p 10 a g Z Li1 1 A VEa. 40 • cc 0., (7J 7 S0 y t tj o s s ? b s L 6* 0) 1? 16 99 % 60 Co c t' r F Iz 13 3 14 is lb r t It 20 it 2t 23 1 1 A VEa. 40 • cc 0., (7J 7 S0 y t tj o s s ? b s L 6* 0) 1? 16 99 % 60 Co c t' r z o e r J ' l ROAD 15 jb 11 18 to 2,3 t, 2 2 4 r1 !1,` 111\ ••.\ /1r\ -" OW PROPERTY LINE / ZONING _MAP Attachment 2 3 14 is lb 1-7 16 It 20 it 2t 23 1 IC I Tz o e r J ' l ROAD 15 jb 11 18 to 2,3 t, 2 2 4 r1 !1,` 111\ ••.\ /1r\ -" OW PROPERTY LINE / ZONING _MAP Attachment 2 of Purposeose for the P ropu ed E:-pansien of the Statement P Property at 1357 Cope Ave. As the business of our. tenant, Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center , Inc. has ma to red , it has. become apparent that the exl 9 Ppstirsu ort area, specifically the retail store and snack bar portions, are not b.ig enough to adequately handle the wants and needs of either the business or its customers . The purpose of the expansion is. to. provide the additional space necessary to provide the c:u c_; tome r s w i th the service that they desire and the business with the revenue that it needs. The added space will be !sP to increase the retail soccer equipment store, expand the snack b ar seatin. 9 and service area. and as. a lounge serving alcoholic and non - alcoholic beverages. owners, we feel that these modif icatlons to As property the facility are in .e °ping with the original purpose of the business and the building.. That purpose being to provide a lace whe r e people can play and en ioy indoor sor_ ` a r and other indoor acti`i Lies . We do not believe th. t t_h _.O modif i.cati.ons will resu 1 t . i n a vastly expan, d number of custoj 'ners or any increased traffic or parking problems. leRather, they are intended to provide a more .amenab environment for our existing customers. We would be more than hapoy to discuss the e:pans t on plans and purpose whenever it is con'.' OF 1 o w I Thom, 'As Hooe 9 Attachment 4 AU821 FA i Co W-" he2 l* 1h A (,lL) d a s / .,o f CA. c i'h.s S Soccer c I.C+. f h e 0 wrons v -2_, 1411h I }S C ,. C e .r. C, Chi' c tG oii2S e soccer ovi^ Ovle ss ws I S do Sl e C vs ,4 -iea chi/ WC) r' lo r)ie3 r.. w W/. - %I se ccP/' f 7th-117 erpe.nS -fherE eo DS ychi r'e n e -- , 114 pC A-kr d ^ n rh j ! ! 10 Attachment 5 Ile - %ccer C.6/1 e/` Svcce r.'S 9'rowiKS r T di h i l lv, nee 4 dur Ow h wt /, n S t n vv ns vl ehu f 004 43 Seri& d , 71tk yQ v nce) C#lvr fy10s f c l/e S Ur i/7S Ir' /wv /l% 7 r c C)1)6 e r t)64 Et.?1 der I- WHEREAS,, Sue and Tom Hope initiated a conditional use permit to construct an addition onto the front of the Corner Kick Indoor. Soccer Center .which would be 19 0 feet .away from the adjacent residential district at the following- described property: Except the W 398 ft; that part south o.f Hwy 36 and west of ry rw. of the nw 1,/4 of the sw . 1/4 (subject to rd) in Sec 10, Tn 298 R. N22. This property is also known as.1357 Cope Avenue, Maplewood; WHEREAS, the:.procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows 1. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September 18, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be 2. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on 1989. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to.law.. All persons present at said.hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and.recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. STOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL THAT the above - described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following findings -of -fact: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and Code of. Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 30 The use would not depreciate property values. 40 The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 12 Attachment 6 50 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would . not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets, s . The use would be served by adequate public facil ities and services, :including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and. parks. 70 The use would ..not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8 The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 90 The use.would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The proposed addition would only be eight feet closer to the front lot line than . the existing building. Approval is subject to the following conditions 10 Adherence to the site plan, date stamped August 21, 1989. 2. There-shall not be any sale of alcoholic beverages. Adopted this day of , 19890 cup.res 13, Planning. Commission MI*nut0s 10-2-89 0-4- c %ading on sites that contain trees to be rpr ,erved. Deviation from this approved gradl,g plan may be permitted by the City Enginetx, provided that the intent of the overall ading plan is complied with. a C Submit a sighed developer's agreement with the required.s.rety f6rerosion control and any tree plant%i required to the City Engineer,, d Approval of a ttee removal and planting plan by the Director of Co' unity DevelopmentMM This plan must illustrate trees over eight inches in d,i'a'meter that are to be removed, those that,..,"are to be retained and those that are to be,/'replanted cominissione Sletten seconded Aye,;--Axd Ail., Barrett Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, r C-; o I I Sigmundik, Sletten Co 1357 Cope Avenue (Corner Kick Soccer) Parking Authorization Conditional Use Permit Secretary Olson presented the staff report for this requested conditional use permit for a 3,066-, square-foot addition propo . sed on the front of the Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center. City Council authorization for 151 fewer parking spi-icel. is also requested. Secretary Olson.said the majority of the neighbors' comments objected to any future liquor license being issued to this business. A commissionerasked -if liquor establishments in Maplewood.are located adjacent to residential properties. Staff said liquor ec--:.,t iit).] I I Inc. I It---, III(Ay be adjacent (such as adjoining back yards) to residential properties, but there are none located on the same street. Tom Hope, the owner of the property, said he did not want the condition prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages included in the recommendation. 111r. Hope said he did not 1-iave to be as specific as he has been about future use of Planning Commission -5- Minutes 1.0 --2- 89 this addition and he does not feel this issue should be considered until 'such time as a liquor license is applied for. Mr. Hope s-1 :i d tYc wc.a i n agreement with the balance of the conditions of the staff recommendation. Chairman Axdahl asked for any comments from the public. There were no comments. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: 10 Approval of a conditional use permit for one year for a building setback of 190 feet from the adjacent.residential district for an indoor soccer. center at 1357 Cope Avenue, based on the findings required by code and. since the proposed addition would only be. eight feet closer to the front lot line than the existing building. Approval is subject to the following conditions: a. Adherence to the site plan, date- stamped August 21, 19890 20 Approval of a parking authorization for 151 fewer parking spaces, based on the following a. There have not been any complaints received indicating parking problems at the Corner Kick Indoor Soccer Center. b. The proposed addition would not be a signi f icant tra f f is . generating use, . but only a support area for the facility. If a parking problem arises in the future, ,the City Council may require that the applicantant sisal_ l restripe the parking lot with 9.5-toot-wide spaces for customers and 9 -foot -wide spaces for employees.. i Commissioner Fiola seconded Commissioner Fischer amended the motion adding to Item 2. a. - "A large part of the building is a soccer field with a low density of players.." Commissioner Fiola seconded Ayes-- Axdzihl, I3 rr. ctt , C1-i rid I 11-1 l , Fiola, 1- ischcr, 6- Larson, Sigmundik, Sletten D. Conditional. Use Permit: 2271. White Bear Avenue Fleming) Secretary Olson presented the staff report for this requested conditional use permit to redevelop a fuel station with a new facility including: a convenience store`, two express lube bays, four regular service bays, a car wash and fuel islands. A commissioner asked' >.,Yhether the.' fuel storage tanks had been inspected for compliance to pollution requirements% y Joe Fleming, the applicant, said the tanks.were installed in 1973 and soils ,-testing was done in the past. Mr. Fleming said. that some contamination was found and'`,., a l l of the tanks will be re laced at this time Chairman Axdahl asked for comments from the public, Theme were no ,/comments, Mr. Fleming said the 6Ldd ition of atch basins on the curb lines shoul.d re any "floodingg . problems on the neighbors , y property',,, i Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recomi ond adoption of the re o.lt_t.l.on approving a conditional use permit for a fuel station and repair garage at 2271 White .Bear Avenue, based on the conditions required by ordinance. Approval is subject to the f of l ow illy conditions: 10 Adhere e to the site lan date-stampedPP Septem er 61 19 8 9 . 2. This ermit shall be subject to review after one ear from the date of approval, 1)(--u,ed (;)ji the procedures in City code. Commis loner Sletten seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Barrett, Car diiial , Fiola, Fischer, Larson, S igmund ik, Sletten t a; Aketi an bb (C -oqX1n.(bJ i Endorsee., - MEMORANDUMe j eoted.., Date City ManagerToY - FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Plan Amendment, Rezoning and. Lot Division LOCATION: 2462 -56 White Bear Ave. APPLICANT: Amoco Oil .Company (Kris Kristufek) DATE: October 13, 1989 INTRODUCTION Request The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1 A plan amendment from LSC, limited service commercial to SC, service commercial. 20 A rezoning from F, farm residential to BC, business commercial. 3. A lot division to create a 272 -foot lot on White Bear Avenue (lot 1 on the site plan) and a 263.02 -foot lot to the east lot 2 on the site plan). Reason for the . Request The current land use classification of LSC limits qas sales to two dispensers on one island to service up to four vehicles at one time. Maintenance, such as car washing, is not allowed. Description of the Project The project would consist of the following: 1. A convenience store building with four gas dispensers in front, covered by a metal canopy. 2. A car wash building. BACKGROUND 10- 28 -88: Application was made. 12- 15 -88: Council established a six -month moratorium on new applications.for motor fuel stations and directed staff to revise and update the City's motor fuel station ordinance. Council also waived the petition requirement for a rezoning for Amoco. (Since then, Council deleted the petition requirement for all rezonin s . g ) 6- 12789: Council extended the moratorium until August 28, 19890 9- -11 --89: Council approved the motor fuel station ordinance. A hearing for the Amoco proposal was scheduled for this meeting. Amoco requested that it be deleted to give them time to complete several studies requested by staff. 10-12-89: Council requested an opinion from,staff on eliminating motor fuel stations from the zoning ordinance. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL 1. comprehensive Plan amendments: There are * no specific findings required for amendment to the Plan, Staf f recommendations.are based on whether the change would be consistent with the goals and objectives in the Comprehensive Plan and,whether the change would have less adverse effects or more benefits to the City and surrounding land uses than the current land use classification. 485 of City Cod20Rezoning* Section 36 e gives six c riteria to use in considering a rezoning or amendment to the zoning code: The council or planning commission shall, among other things: a. Assure itself that the proposed change is.consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of this chapter (zoning). b.. Determine that the.proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use. of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. Determine that the proposed change will serve the best interest and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. d. Consider the effect of the proposed change . upon the logical,, efficient, and economical extension of public.services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools, e. Be guided.in its study,, review and recommendation by sound standards of subdivision practice where applicable, f. Impose such conditions, in addition to those required, as are necessary to assure that the intent of this chapter is complied with,.which conditions include, but not be limited tomayi , r harmonious design of buildings, planting and its maintenance, a sight or sound screen, the minimizing of noxious, offensive or hazardous elements, and adequate standards of.parking and sanitation. ALTERNATIVES 1. Rezone the.:site to BC(M), business commercial modified and approve a conditional use permit for a minor motor fuel, station. 2 This would. require the developer to reduce the dispensers to two on one island and drop the car wash. This would be consistent with the LSC land use designation. with the tank.vents bein within 200 feet of a residential area. If the lot division is approved, the property owner should be required to-dedicate an additional 17 feet of-property along the north 84,41 feet of the White Bear. Avenue frontage to line up. with the street right -of --way to the south. A cash connection charge of $46,170 should also be required with the lot split in lieu of assessments for 11th Avenue, sanitary sewer and water.. 2 Deny the requested plan amendment and rezoning DLS CUSSION This site would not meet a requirement in the motor fuel station ordinance that major motor fuel stations shall not be permitted within 350 feet of areas planned for residential use on the City's land use plan. (The property to the south is developed with a single - family home and is designated on the City's land use plan for.RL, residential low density.) The proposed ordinance also requires that tank vents not be within 200 feet of a residential area unless the Council finds that proposed buildings would prevent fumes from reaching the residential area. The vents on this project would be 45 feet from the residential lot line to the south. The vents were originally proposed on the north side of the site, 176 feet from the south lot line. There is a car wash building that may hinder the spread of fumes to the south if the vents were relocated to the north lot line. The proposed location would cause a problem from the odor. Staff requested that the developer provide three additional studies to evaluate . the impact.of a plan amendment - a traffic study, an appraiser's report and a soils study. The first two have been done. (See studies on pa es 22 and 32.) The soils study is not complete as of this writing. RECOMMENDATION Deny the land use plan amendment and rezoning on the basis that the station would violate a requirement of the motor fuel station ordinance that prohibits major motor fuel stations within 350 feet of land planned for residential use. 3 Staff surveyed the 20 property owners within 350 feet of the site Of the 13 replies, five were in favor, one had no position and seven objected. Comments from those in favor. I feel my property does not have.much residential value and would like to sell it commercially with limited restrictions." 2 416 White Bear Ave. - Mil lete ) With the provision that the median cut is directly across from our exit, or else I would prefer to see no median cut at all." 2480 White Bear. Ave. - dental clinic) . Development'i.n this area in the past years have changed from what we have experienced as a good area for residential living to now where the property should be zoned for BC property" (.2456 White Bear Ave. - Edmund and Margaret Berggren) Comments from the owner with no position: Present zoning is certainly not appropriate. It would seem more appropriate to address how the entire quadrant will be used at the time this is granted" (2515 White Bear Ave. - rental home owned byDainPension . Investors ) Comments from those objecting: It will devalue my property" (1937 Gervais Ave. - Gusinada). Object because of the many accidents at this corner. More traffic, more accidents. Right hand turn lanes might help. What about the many retarded and handicapped that.get on and off busses at this corner every day" (2500 White Bear Ave. - Fernow). Proposed project could cause a safety problem to residential adjacentacent properties. ` p perties. Piecemeal development requires too many curb cuts along White Bear Ave., which is not compatible with present and projected traffic. Property should be developed with one developer between 11th Ave. and Gervais Ave. and should be zoned LBC or BC. This will allow the City and County more control over the type of development and access from White Bear Ave. 2428 White Bear Ave. - Berkowitz). The land between 11th Ave. and Gervais should be developed as one parcel" (2444 White Bear Ave. - Kult.. Also refer to their letter on page 17.) We do not need a Oil Company there. We have enough of those around. Any other way except the Oil Co." (1955 Gervais Ave. - Benick) . 4 Staff comment: The courts have.ruled that the City cannot deny an.application solely on the basis of whether the business is needed. The market will determine whether the station will be needed. Refer to the letter on page 19 from 2434 White Bear Ave. -- Donald Berggren and the petition on page 21 5 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Gross area: Lot one - 1..05 acres Lot two - 1.23 acres Existing land use: two single- dwelling homes that would be removed Property Owners: 2456 White Bear Ave.: Edmund Berggren (resident). 2462 White Bear Ave.: White Bear Ave. Partnership. (taxpayer) Gerald Proulx (fee owner) SURROUNDING LAND USES Single- dwelling homes to the south and east, a dental clinic to the north, Mapleridge Shopping Center to the northwest and Montgomery Wards office to the west. PAST ACTIONS 12- -15 -88 : The City Council waived the requirement for a . rezoning petition.for this application. (This requirement has since been dropped.) PLANNING LSC, Limited Service Commercial definition: The limited service commercial center classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale.. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc., would be prohibited. Other land uses of a medium intensity nature, such as gas sales with no vehicle repair or maintenance and with no more than. two pumps on a single island to service up to four vehicles at one time, may be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards as defined in the zoning code" (P ga e 18 -3 1) . The SC, service commercial classification is defined as follows: This commercial classification is oriented to facilities which are local or community- wide scale. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of a high- intensity nature, such as fast food restaurants, discount sales outlets, gas stations, and light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. The objective of establishing this district is to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and development of the neighborhoods in which they are located" (page 18 -31) . MEMO6 Attachments 10 Land Use Plan map 2.0 Property Line /Zoning Map 3, Site Plan 40 Applicant's letter of justification 5. Letter: Ramsey County Traffic Engineer 60 Letter: Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District 70 Letter: ..Catherine Kult 8. Letter:. Donald Berggren 9. Letter. Merrill Lynch 100 Letter: Kults and Berggrens 110 SEH traffic study 12. Property value study: Kenna 13 . Plans (separate attachment) 7 Interchange Vadnals Heights N PA 1 talor . collector B) s c 4, O 1 r of'-fl d. c v — - LSC L B p .......... w cos Major colle - c)tnr___ —r-, O U O O U O ri E HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN s lilt erchango 694 major mintQ=0rn=inown a ..a =a=a I L col IoCt A .N r ..y b 1 ff_lnor-art so Li 1-11 M iR. - os C cA, t r T R Q SC. -y _ _ RH • L5 fir a r tit sac fir• . .f _ 1 to r ha 9e { N Q Co m tY3 r N Attachment l 0 V1 U U C .- 11J O U O O U O ri E HAZELWOOD LAND USE PLAN s lilt erchango 694 major mintQ=0rn=inown a ..a =a=a I L col IoCt A .N r ..y b 1 ff_lnor-art so Li 1-11 M iR. - os C cA, t r T R Q SC. -y _ _ RH • L5 fir a r tit sac fir• . .f _ 1 to r ha 9e { N Q Co m tY3 r N Attachment l 1 6 17 18 19 20 21J D-E-M 0 N.T o S5 4b Lq f < 3 7 36 f - 15. 1 G,) 3j+ -4 .3 7 to . 9 0 aw . 4- .6 27 +345) 3 (z 2) I o Y 4 . -7 (o ac-,. Co ow Foods Dental c l in i c ON Rai nb ` ' q o + 14x5 f Ll u Ea, 0 ra, 3 D o c 1813.5 1 2 779, Street ESmf. We 711.8 8' - - - - - - - i - -,.,p f 5 -• "'-- - .. , ..._ _ .._ ......_ - - S': }r' Re":•.•a .'$...1 ." • i• '.'••ii :oL .::.'.,LL' tii •.'ib..:: :' :•i • • • r }i •a• iiiiiii 2462 :,,,,. •:•::::...:: ... • .,.... r:: LL• L . • . • i' : .ti• •s•: ••- tip}.} q X. • w . :. :• :.:•: :: w1: 00 310 2456 00 35 i . : :: : •era. . 2444 i 2 L 2434 0 0 y LJ 1 1 1 2428 (14) 3s ,, 4 4 cu. 17.9 8 v ,C S. 4411 o L 33 AS Montgomery Wards office !- 41 a. / In 3 5 1 3 o Z eo t 7 3 5 ra J 5 125 .• 4f,. i IOLBa3i ZE R VA 13 _ 1 . 4(V" 4& s PROPERTY LINE-/ ZONING MAP 9 Attachment 2 pw _wwvw 4 N J•s•i- •:lS ra nil l .t • 11 ti. ..''•'1 'T i... ' r,•.. w• w ..• . . i :.a. . ... • r• •r. •• •••r`•'. :: ` • 1 -• i < i i i s . i r _ ` / f .a • • . • : i, s . 11TH AVERS rua. • arar r w•.•. r.•.__w.i. .s ... .o w_w.. ••arr v.r ••••s. .-:.-w - - - -a w.w-.w sw.i•.ir .`r•w F may. . w ww w. w_ • • .. • •. ~.+` aY. M ! + • revL rw. r. r .w + iJ •.ate . w W - E yam• r nn •. •• r.• r .r 4 aS•ewelelfAGGCSS I MEOW 1/ 1Mal ry WTI M at 's eaars e' r xz.ct s a rt' r w. r r r. w r r r r • r r •.. w• rw r r r r,_r r r r rrM rr• r IM UTA LOT A.F" LDT 1 soz3 i ar. tv Am:- LC)T ! "As" wr. t1! A.G.: MOM TOTJM. OQ,"" Of. I" AG. AIM* at OOWD" allR DM AM" 4= W. turn Qrwrsr• sw= ar O-S TOM 1bd0 D t!I". i.t1 rw Nat CWQ?*AAH _a!'. 9.8% CA.40P'Y *44" 81F. 4.^ lA-MO POOTP'FWr 9.94U Ow. rj% Q OCNIKLTAKM OU PROYEM !a /GRT1iI=T Um. . S or. ZI. • w +.... w.a rsar.o.. oe..a r.s. afl?T1 /A R7lGtIf11 Ml iii 'AFf3Q 4& 1LOl9 LLt C 3t+C?IC CC1 UlX DG w w+Me F&KX, VD 4 WACM z J MY Zap DQ Tlq Y''-- PAMM F aDA," DW MCT oa. oc rfiDP'Ct i •fC: - RJM Eii AJO OAiEiOMI. Dl w 1. au 1 /vu 1 M1.x11MOOfJ IiN SITE PLAN 10 Attachment 3 4 N AMOCO SITE 11T11 WHITE BEAR AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA The subject site is currently zoned F-Farm/Residential. an currently contains two wood frame houses and out buildings. Amoco Oil Company intends to split the subject property into A-1WO roughly eqUal lots and construct and operate *a motor fuel stat.ion with a detached car wash on the westerly lot. The easterly lot will be sold,. The applicant feels the Comprehensive Plan change is ju.stif.i.(--(i due to the change in character of the area from 11O.Sidential to rocs Lly commercial ov.er the years. White Bear Av(--!nue- has, become. a heavily traveled route throughout this a I rea with traffic counts .in excess of 17,000 cars per day. The-re are commercial properties to the north and a major fii.Oiwtay Lo the south. I'lle property is surrounded by existing and/or potential commercial development 4 the desirability of the property of the property*for residenti.al use, All necessary infrastructure is already in place and the use should not require expansion of existing service, OCT 2.8 1988 AAAY1 1 se CountyRam DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3377 North Rice Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55126 612) 484 -.9104 Divisions of: Engineering Maintenance RAMSEY .CQUr8m Mobile Equipment Environmental Services May 30, 198.9 Mr.. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road.B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Amoco Station - White Bear Avenue and 11th Street Th.e. Ramsey County Public Works department has reviewed the proposed site plan for the Amoco Station at White Bear Avenue and 11th and offers the following comments: 1. The northern most driveway on White Bear Avenue should be eliminated from the plan. Vehicles northbound on White Bear Avenue turning left onto Gervais /11th frequently back up from this intersection. Therefore, left turns into this driveway would have to be made from the inside thru,lane immediately south of the intersection, causing potential backup through the signalized intersection. 20 The median opening on 11th is not recommended as shown on the plans. The type of opening.shown requires vehicles to sto P in the through lane to left turn onto the site. Because the median is wide in this area it may be possible'to remove portions of the median and provide a left turn lane into the site. However, 11th Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the City of Maplewood and any decisin regardin g the median opening would be up to the city, The developer will be required to acquire an entrance p e:.mi t from Ramsey County Public Works Department for his entrance on White Bear Avenue. If you have any further questions, please give me a call. Daniel. E. Soler Acting Traffic Engineer DES :ptd 12 Attachment 5 RAMSEY SOIL aNO WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Dairy canior of Minnesota 2015 Rica Street Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Telephone: (612) 488 -1476 WHINIV IN tJIJ I Fi SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT O i•; 1r1 ._.' °1.)(_7r.i (, t t :.V 1.•: 1C 11 t ! t.i :.,t_.,'-xi ' c. .: .1; :tjrt. :;t_qi t , l::i :, f..:. c, t: ! ='1: tti t: r r,w i t I rl z ... .: , t. iE rrt:. Count Oi_L t.lI. yeti :i.rict:i. {:ate c h ?x,rne:i:1.. tY ; -iIA. L .,r t- r r.':;t':L rn z r .r: •.: C. c; RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Dairy Center of Minnesota 2015 Rice Street Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Telephone: (612) 488 -1476 To: Rokert Johnson, District Site Plan /I7lat Review Committee Chairman Froill: Tom Petersen, Conservation District N'1ana(,-Ter Date: January 11, 1989 Stiblect: Amoco Oil Company Lot Split and Rez()Ile I. Zntro(itictlorl The attkiched request for revieW is from the City of i-laplewood. Amoco ail Company isPY re(1tle.stlilg a permit to rezone and split a lot at the southeast corner of White Beer Avenue rind I Ith Street (see location map). The exlsting Z()I1in(T IS Farm/Residential single TamilY mAmoco is seeking i Commercial zone status. II. Soil (awl Site Associated Water Resources Soils: The Ramsey County Soil Survey in(hcates that the folloN,ving soil map in(T unitsl 111(1y he f`()t1I1(I on site (see attached C0111pLIter generated soils nlap). `rhe soils infoI- I11atioll coil taIned 1I1 this report should not be used for site specific regulation or construction suitability analysis. The soils information in this report and the soils survey are intended for general land LISC', planiling Only. Any potential soils related limitation must be alltillfied site specifically by a lolls CI1gllielcr. 8 7C - Urb an Land'r'au egarI Complex, 3 to 1J o slopes. Tile major -Ly of this nrlappinb flint is listed as being "urban lands," i.e. soils that have been altered by urban development. The remainCler of the mappinj Unit consists of Watikegan and associated soils.1 In general, the Waukegan soils are well stilted to development. However, the subsoils have a high permeability rate a11d may present a problem to containing a chemical spill. 85 8C - Urban Land /Chetek Complex, 3 to 15 Io slopes. The ma'orit of this mappingJYpPg unit IS listed as helm "urban lands," i.e. soils that have been altered by urban development. The remainder. of the mapping unit consists of Chetek and associated soils.1 In general the Chetek tic)Ils are silltable for development. As with. the Waukegan soils, the subsoil profile has excessive pernict"Iblllty. This excessive perm .eabillty I11ay present a potentia alproblemit chenlickll Spill Were to OC;CUr. Water Resources: There are no water resources on site. All drainage will be directed to storm sewers-. Storm sewers in this area lead to a branch of Ramsey County Iaitch No. 18. 1 soli survey of Vtashlllt(I1 4,tl( Ramsey Count y- ANAN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 14 Robert Johnson Pale ? January 11, 1989 III. Stimnitiry and Recommendations The coarse textured nature of the subsoils may present a potential for rapid infiltrarion of chemicals. This in turn may lead t o a grOLindwater contamination potential. Soil erosion should not be a si`,n i flc int problem oil this site CILIe to the fairly level topobraphy. However, eroded s()lls sll()tlld he confined to the site. I belie\te that the illajor sedimentation COIIC;CI'Il SholllCl be soils. being tr4acked from the site by construction vehicles. The fine textured top soils of this site fire very plastic and thus trackable. I'he proposed site is wittlin the IZ tn sey- vashir;toli Metro 'Vatcrsl ecl District aC1d dogs fit into the permit criteria. Please call me at the District Office if you have any questions. 15 16 1i{ .L : i'- ...f. i Y .. ., Y r: J. :!':h /I lA'J`• a Iy X Aw .N` . V" A... :151 t.. i .S•: .. ..: 1 T' I: '1 "•L . .. .- of :\•:.: : ( r::. t a : .. r i i .,.. .. ' J.. • • T' 111• -Yr 7:. ; ; .. ..5: s Oii •:• f.. •• y F. 1' r j r sr. lre. SrI.Y. 4 r.•: i ..'. 7. r :::. J. A •x J' • T yr.. J w : \.: • Ir.Y.. tY•••• •Fev`- g' " A'. • A'` x A1T Y • jx s t } .; .• ...y . »... Y::~ :::.1' r.:: f t 3• .w, { r Y• :.: 1..i j C s_.t ice.. :.:+ L I RiC> 1mM1 J T:. ?% •X .':. j #sy .: \. tf.r, Y•i: .. y u w I ", w 11• a• X.tt Yi.{L. A jL• .S 1 V _ A A A V4% s.rr v Aw Al w •' ! aq i or ammol wn • t•, w.r,nn. vwd. J ... , S NO % / r7JUrlefr.1e11•r 1rt r Vd, 1•' , r• '•• - vw r r.n• ' i , t to % •'11•YraM.t S'., .. fir.: A :' i 'i s•• NO Aasr s f ---- Xfrlafafai: _.-..',,.m• ° a1a°a.. or soa a f•r u vWff . rs rr}r ••r•5 i.••.: '1''} f x ,r I a. ( 1, Z : I '• t' T .\ . 1 ar s Jl:. ••,5 i.V,. yj :, ya''' :'S Y'' r8 r }:: `• '':.5 w 1s+aii.s L•'+•' A 4-.-t n =fu's'• rr f i S . i r:: r.•. wv. u•. v: vv- rrt•::::::•.•vas::7.:.t• ;+ 3 a ^err T.:. ^t 7' T y Y ^nr..5.. •..,r........«.......... •.... •a.n 1 all as No av,• t aissss:cra L • y.. 3Zft d 444sr ss+'A. :.-i 1 ii t1•L ^]Z' t -: 65 = ..Y a te' r • as :: !, ` .. A.Z^ S'r ... 1'. - t.• -f,aarra ! L l.A z on l crlr Ly $ Ir jN ji/ y. q j is ta 7 t ' i •i a+ i 1 9 . r• Y• 1. . -r _,.... , ter t . . •: a.+ ar • r•1 r f:Y A•'I' •' ..: Y.: NOW J .. rrY .. • ... I AN. an r' r ... ! ... 1Gia .•ii•• rrArrf•M tL.1.aJ•1,,71iid>1r11. 4 »^ - -W -- dil. t,••AY ••',YI+i: 1 iias:•' -'_ - - I' - t.f:i 1i1'Y tArR73 YY.I1C 16 P - c..r- r 00 Attachment 7 17 My objection because of the tweet four operation close to a residential area ,wich would leave our area open to un- wanted intruders espec.ialy during the late hours . I'm also concerned how the remainder of -the property. would be developed by Amoco. (Bas t of prop ds ed. site ) Allowing Amoco. to build on -the proposed site would lessen our chances to an interested developer who ,would rather dew ve l op the whole area . Ia is o understand that it is not in keep- ing with the 6it-,y of Maplewood's land use. plan Those of us along White Bear Ave .between 11th ave and r.4rvis have had this area listed for nearly two years ,we would like to see it all goes. a.sone unit not to be broken up piece tmeal. Finally, the ma j orit, of +he home owners are for a develop- er to come in and deve op this area Thank you for your attention in this matter. Respectfully Donald D.Berggren A '4 White Bear, Ave . Mlap l ewood , hin *55,1090 19 Attachment 8 tJ Buinet j a MAPLEWOOD OFFICE 1856 BEAM AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 612) 770 -3711 g 7 Dear Sirs, Please find enclosed, some information on a new listing we have in Maplewood, We hope you will find this useful, At this time we have 17+ acres, with a total of ?g acres ava l able. The property is located at White Bear Ave, and Hwy.36 with frontage on both. Although the property is residential at this time, it has great potential being completely surrounded by commercial. Our sellers have agreed to market their properties as one parcel. The area is experiencing substantial growth at this time. We esti- mate the car count on White Bear Ave., alone to be i n excess of 21,000 per day. Along with Hwy 36, the exposure is unlimited. Our property is located within 6 blocks of Maplewood Mall (now being expanded), several "strip" malls, St. Johns Hospital East, and many rest- aurants. Freeway access is excellent to both downtown St. Paul and Minnea- polis. The qua 1 i.ty of 1 i f i n Map 1 ewood i s second. to none We. are c 1 ose to several recreational activities, including shopping, movies, lakes, and parks. The North St. Paul, Maplewood School district is among the fin." est in the state. . Also there is a wide range of housing alternatives, all in clean quiet neighborhoods. If you would like any further information regarding the development site, please feel free to call. We also have information on a few other sites in the area, both larger and smaller. We look forward to being at your service. Best Wishes, Tammy Skweres N1_ll vnr_h RPa I ty. rri _ 770 -3711 TS /df 20 Attachment 9may +u.wrNj QEAl1040 December 22,1988 To Whom It May Concern Vie the undersigned, as ad acent propertyJpperty owenrs, are opposed to theproposedAmocodevelopmentonthecornerroertat11 ' Bear .Ave. for the f P P y 11th and Whitefollowingreasons: 1) 24 hour operation a) Noise (especially normal uiquiet hours. ) b) With incre-ased exposure to the ublicp we fear the possibility of vandalism., 2) It goes against future proposed guidelines, regarding200footsetbackoffuelventsfromresidentia1property. B) We feel concerned about the future use of the balance ofthepropertyinquestion, Although we do aropposethis ' P particularar deve.lopment for the reasonsstatedabove, we would not oppose a total lan of d e on White p development forthefrontagelhiteBearAve., bound by 11th and Gervais. Sincerely, Roger Don a-1 d., Ber 99 ren f i atherine Ku t Editn Berggren. 1 ROSALIE A VALENTO CTARY pUBLIO -MIt NIESOTA ANOKA POUNr 0('1 M =XPIRES OCI IU 1991 Y y 21 Attachment 10 P$ 0 rA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 222 E -4ST L! ".3, ST PAUL, kl/NNESOTA 55117 612 484 -0272 September 14, 1989 RE: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AMOCO STATION SE CORNER OF WHITE BEAR AVENUE /11TH STREET. SEH FILE NO. 90055 Mr . Geoff Olson Planning Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: SEH, Inca has completed its Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review for the proposed Amoco Gas Station and convenience store to be located at the southeast corner of White Bear Avenue `and 11th Avenue in Maplewood.. Our analysis includes a determination of project traffic generation and distribution ercenta e ofpg pass -by versus "new trips, overall impact to traffic volumes on White Bear Avenue and 11th Avenue, and review of the roposed site design. p p As you requested, we have also made a com arison between traffic volumes generated by the proposed project and an estimation of volumes that could be generated if the site were to be developed under its present zoning classification of limited service commercial. For.further comparison purposes, trip generationPpgaton of an office project on this site was also identified. Project Description The proposed project consists of four asg dispensers, a convenience store of 1,560 square feet, and a car wash of 1,932 square feet. The west side of the project is adj scent to WhiteBearAvenue, which is a four -lane arterial with continuous leftturnlanesbothnorthandsouthof11thAvenue. The north sideoftheprojectisadjacentto11thAvenuelanewhichisafour - facility with a raised median along the project frontage., P J ge, and . single eastbound and westbound left turn tan ' es at White Bear Avenue, Eleventh Avenue tapers down to a two -lane facilityyapproximately200' east of the proposed service station.. Adentalclinicislocatedacross11thAvenuefromthe ' roect. The east side of the project i p p s adjacent to an existing single family home, which would be removed. The property would then bepYbe reparcelized, and would become a future development site. A single family home also exists to the south of the sit e, and is expected to remain. 1111 '1 '1 WA I At 111 tit )l•'?( F ' J )t4 ?r P IN1' c ( IN' 1N 22 Attachrnent 11 Mr. Geoff Olson September 14 1989 Page #2 In addition to the service station /convenience store ro osalpPthedeveloperisalsorequestingthattheCityofMaplewood approve a rezoning of the property from Limited Service Commercial (LSC) to Service Commercial (SC). LSC zonin g allows only two gas dispensers on one island... Therefore, the rezoningis.necessary in order for this project to.be approved. Trip Generation Traffic generation for the proposed project is estimated as shown below: J w ADT A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Inbound 958 81' 85 Outbound 958 79 80 Total: 1916 160 165 ADT . - Average Daily Traffic This trip generation was derived using tri p g eneration rates fromtheITETripGenerationManualforservicestationsand convenience stores. The traffic generation was not increased duetothecarwashsincethis. type of car wash is an accessorytheservicestation. It's impact Y o p will consist of making. theAmocoStationamorepopularoutletatwhichtopurchase' as n very Tittle traffic will p g and be generated for the sole purpose of using the car wash. This is reflected in the rates for theservicestationand.convenience store. Trip Distribution Traffic volumes were distributed based on thee location and thenatureofdevelopmentinthesurroundingareaaswellasthelocationofothergasstationslocatedincloseeproximity, ThenearestgasstationstothenorthincludeaCitoStationlocatedat. northwest corner of White Bear Avenue and Count and a station north of the Y Road C Rainbow Food Center which is currentlybeingremodeledforSuperAmerica. The two nearest as ' g stationstothesoutharelocatedsouthofTrunkHighway36. A 'Phillipsps76Stationislocated. on the west side of White Bear Avenuewhilea. Fina Station is located along the east side. Thee FinaStationoffersafairlylarge - sized convenience store. other considerations include the level of pass-by trip (vehiclesYp ( es already on surrounding streets, enroute. to another destination and the location of access points to nearby commercial sites. 23 Mr.. Geoff Olson September 14, 1989 Page ##3 Inbound traffic to the Amoco Station was estimated to enter the site as follows: 15% 40% 20 %. 25% This distribution was I below: S from f rom from from ased the the the the on urrounding land uses Access points to nearby commercial sites Pass by trips -- Studies have shown ht at an average amount of pass -by traffic to convenience stores makes up 45% of the total trip generation, ipgon. Pass -by trafficsforgasstationsaverages58% of the • g e total tripgeneration. Therefore, a conservative average of thesetwopercentages, 50 %, has been used for the oseurthis. study. p P of Location of.nearest service station /convenience /convenience stores. Only 15% of the inbound traffic to the project was assumed tocomefromthenorth. This is the result of twSouthboundtrafficwill o f actors : 1) pass two other service stations (CitgoandsuperAmerica) on the west sidee of White Bear Avenue, .whichwillrequirerightturnmovementsintothe • 2 stationnstead ofleftturnmovementsAtleasthalfofthesouthbou. instead d tri s,totheservicestationswillbepass-bpstriYps m eaning that driverswillcontinuetothe. south, east or west, allowing them to alsomakearig egress turn out of the stations to the n orthturningressande . The right g s will be preferred by most driversespeciallyduringpeakhours. ' Forty percent (40%) of the inbound prod ect traffic is estimatedtocome. from. the. south (northbound White Bear • due: to the .easy right turn Avenue). This 1sYgingressfornorthboundtrafficaswellasthefactthatthisprojectwouldbethe • station to the White Bea closest serviceBearAvenue /Trunk Highway 36 interchange, located less than 1/4 mile south • of the project. North South West East several factors which are listed 24 Mr. Geoff Olson September 14, 1989 Page #4 Twenty percent (20%) of the inbound project traf f is is expected to come from the west via Gervais Avenue, while 25% is expected to arrive from. the east on 11th Avenue . This reflects the tendency of residents in the surrounding neighborhood and employees at nearby industries (Montgomery. Ward) to stop at the service station /convenience store closest to their home or p lace Of work. at the beginning or end of their trip rather than stopping in the middle of a trip. In the event that multi-familydevelopmentoccurswestoftheMapleridgeShoppingCenter (north of Gervais Avenue), the inbound traffic from the west mayincreaseslightly, while the percentage of inbound traffic from the east of the project may decrease slightly, Outbound traffic distribution is slightly different than in bound to reflect the destination of northbound pass -by trips enroute to 1 694 and the Maplewood Mall area: 25% to the North 30% to the South 20% to the West 25% to the East Outbound traffic to the south is slightly higher thanYg to thenorth, reflecting the close proximity of the site to TrunkHighway36tothesouthandtheresultantdrawoftraffic. Distribution to the east is slightly highergy than the west (250versus20 %) due to the concentration Of multi-family dwellingunitseastofArielStreet. As revs g previously stated, a multi- familydevelopmentwestoftheMapleridgeShoppingCentermayshiftdistributionslightly, Y the sli g y, resulting in an equal percentage ofoutboundtripsheadedtowardtheeastandwest. Back round Traffic Volumes, Figure A shows the background traffic volumes • o umes on White BearAvenueand11thStreet. The White Bear Avenue traffic countsweretakeninJuly, 1989, while the 11th Street traffic counts' were made in August, 1989. A.M. and p.m. peak hour volumes makeUpapproximately10% of the ADT. Project Traffic Impacts Figure B shows the driveway volumes and turning movements basedOnthetripgenerationanddistributionofthero 'ect. Nonep ofthepeak. hour turning movements are high enough to createg a capacity shortage at surrounding intersections. However the southbound left turn movement into the southerly driveway isYy not 25 an optimal turning movement since there is no southbound left turn lane, and vehicles in the northbound. left turn lane may be queued beyond the driveway. If this occurs, southbound through traffic will -be temporarily. delayed. Over time the difficulties of this situation may result in an increased volume of southboundturnmovementsat11thStreet, where drivers can then make a right turn into the site. The. total project traffic on White Bear Avenue south of 11th Street is 671 average daily trips, 56 a.m. peak hour trips and 59 P.m.- peak hour trips. Of these, approximately 50% (45% for the convenience store and 585% for the service station), can be expected as pass -by trips. The "new" traffic along White. Bear Avenue constitutes a one percent (.1 -°s) increase in total traffic volumes along this segment of the roadway. The same increase is expected to the north of 11th Avenue. The increase in traffic volumes along 11th Avenue east of white Bear Avenue is expectedtobethreepercent (3o) An. even smaller increase will occur west of White Bear Avenue, since the ro'ect volumes arpJ e lower,_ while the background volumes are heavy, especially duringdurin thepeakhoursduetothefactthattheMontgomeryWardbuildingnthe .asoutheastcornerhas main acce ss off 11th Street g Com arison with Service Commercial Zoning As previously stated, the proposed ' approximately 1 p p protect generates pp y ,916 average daily trips, 160 a.m, peak hour tripsand165pp.m..peak hour trips. If the site were to remain undertheLimitedServiceCommercial (LSC) zoning designation, g on, one ofthedevelopmentpossibilitieswouldbeaneighborhoodretailtailcenterwithaconveniencestoreandpumps, ass o the LSC zonin ciated . Un designation, g p p der g g , a maximum of one island with two gasdispensersispermitted. A 12,500 square foot neighborhood as dispensers g oodretailcenterwithtwogpenserscanbeexpectedtogeneratetripsasfollows. ADT A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Inbound 1095 56 132Outbound109532130Total: 2190 89 262 This represents a 14% increase in ADT a 4 • o 4o decrease n a.m. peak. hour traffic, and a 59-s increase i.n p.m. peak hour traffi cwhencomparedwith.the proposed Amoco service station /convenience 26 Mr. Geoff Olson. September 14, 1989 Page ##6 store. Another consideration that should be taken into account is the percentage of pass -by trips at a retail center I of this size, A conservative estimate of pass -by traffic in this instance would be 15 %. This is due to the.fact that this type of center is much more likely to be the ultimate destination of a trip rather than a stop enroute to another destination. Therefore, traffic impact of this type of project would be greater than that of the proposed service station, result" in approximately a three to four percent increase over exist' ngtrafficvolumesonWhiteBearAvenueanda4$ increase over existing volumes on ll.th Avenue and Gervais Avenue The largest size office building which could be 'accommodatedomodated onthesitehasbeenestimatedat18,000 square feet based on theCityofMaplewood's setback and Parking requirements. An officebuildingofthissizecanbeexpectedtotripsfollows: g as ADT A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Inbound 190 40 8 Outbound 190 6 39 Total: 390 46 47 Virtually none of the. trips to a general office buildi ng arepass -by trips, therefore, all of the ro ' ect rPt aff. ' c must becounted. toward the increase in traffic along heg surroundingarterials. In addition, a larger proportiongPP of office traffic n can be expected to use White Bear Avenue to et to site g and from the approximately 80 %). This is due to the.fact that an ' officeprojectwillnotdrawfromthesurrounding. neighborhood (11thAvenueandGervaisAvenue) to the same extent as a ' servicestationorretailcenter. Traffic volumes on Gervais and 11thAvenuewouldincreaselessthan1- as a result of an officeproject, while volumes on- White Bear .Avenue would increaseapproximately1percent Site Plan Review Several concerns with regard to access - • parkin have been i on -site circulation and g identified. i.ed . They are as follows: 1. The median opening t the westerly • g e ly access off 11th Street saconcern. As shown on the site plan, this opening would beawkwardfordriverstonegotiate, and would cause traffic to 27 Mr..-Geoff Olson September 14, 1989 Page ##7 slow down in the through -lane on 11th Avenue. The median opening would allow drivers to pull out. into the middle ofthestreetandwaittocompletetheirleftturnmovement leaving a portion of the vehicle obstructing he thrg oughlane. Westbound traffic turning left into . the 'site at thislocationwillalsopausein. the median break, waiting o complete their turn. This situation g creates awkward turningmovementsandasignificantlygreaterpotentialfor accidents. Therefore, the City ish toYmaY allow thedrivewayasaright -in /right -out access only, 2. It is very unlikely hat Ramseyy County will permit_ twodrivewaysalongWhiteBearAvenue. The northerly drivewayistooclosetotheintersection Y veway and will create conflictswhendriverswishtogetintothenorthbound .lefteft turn laneortheinsidethroughlaneafterexitinghesiteviadriveway. Deletion of g this this driveway . wi. l l not a l ter tripdistributionintoandoutofthesiteitwouldonlymoreoutboundtripstothe shift P southerly access, where drivershaveasaferopportunitytoetintotheir ' g e r desired lane oftravelpriortotheintersection. The 'southerly drivewaylocatedanacceptabledistance veway is tance from 11th Avenueapproximately1851fromcurbof11thAvenuetocurbofthedriveway) and should not be shifted to the north, 3. During our meeting f Septembergpber 71 we were informed that thelocationofthepetroleumstoragetanksmaybe comply with a ro Y changed to p posed zoning ordinance modification whichwouldrequireadistanceof200' 1 between • a residentialpropertylineandundergroundpetroleumstorage. Whendeterminingthelocationofthestoragetanks ' must be iven to • g. consideration g the driveways which the deliver semi- trucks will use, and the maneuver habilitybothwithin thedrivewaysandonthesite. In their currentt location on thesiteplanitappearsthatasemi. -truck etrol • p eum delivery) can gain access to the site from White Bear Avenue n area; h a d gettotheunloadinghowever, it appears very difficultforthetrucktoexitthesiteunlessthe ' right turn on driver makesg• 11th Avenue, and travels through theresidentialareatotheeastto g get back to White BearAvenue. Any other attempts to exit the site wouldon -site traffic. congest 4. The inside radius of the ac • accesses to White Bear Avenueshouldbeincreasedto15feettofacilitatemovements. itate turning W 5 The northerly vacuum island. should be designed with a five foot (51) radius on the outside corner in order to facilitate turning movements into the car wash stackinglane. 6 East of the entrance to the car wash, the -stacking lane should be reduced to to feet in width to assist drivers in aligning their vehicles properly. 7. It appears that a four foot (4' sidewalk i ' s providedbetweenthebuildingandtheparkingon.both the east and west sides of the convenience store.. If drivers allow their vehicles to overhang the sidewalk, the remaining width couldbereducedto2 -3 feet g This width would not be adequateforthedoor -swing of the building entrance. A solution tothisconcernwouldbetoeitherincreasethewidthofthe sidewalk, eliminate' parking in front of the doorthehandicapspaceclosetothe or move. door, placing the striped ramp portion of the space directly in front . of the doorway, 8 An additional concern with regard tog the northerly drivewayonWhiteBearAvenueisthefactthatdriverswillcrossthroughthegaspumpareaenroutetoconveniencestoreparking.. This creates conflicts with pedestrians in the gaspumparea. 9. There is a potential oint of • P conflict approximately halfthedistancebetweenthecarwashandthesoutherlydriveway, as vehicles exiting the car washgs will be n theopposinglaneoftravel, and will need to transition to th correct lane as they proceed to the driv e eway. This could beapointofon.site congestion with inbound traffic, We are pleased that we could be of assistance to you in thisproject. Please do not hesitate to contact myself u y or Glen VanWormerifyouhaveanyquestionsorneedadditionalinformation. Sincerely, i Cin Gray Transportation Planner CG /wrc 29 I 1 W Z W J Q Q W m W f-- 2 0 0 0 T 0 0 Lo V) M N t-- T O fO V ) O L J 0) N T PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING VOLUMES ON WHITE. BEAR AVENUE AND, 11TH STREET IE A 30 MAPLEWOOD it F r `t:$4i Et 1r i +,r,.i, cSd$X,y, x' .: % t•Lr?.:: t7, co O N O r-- N OLo t-- C'\! Co 0 Lo N T 1 W Z W J Q Q W m W f-- 2 0 0 0 T 0 0 Lo V) M N t-- T O fO V ) O L J 0) N T PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING VOLUMES ON WHITE. BEAR AVENUE AND, 11TH STREET IE A 30 MAPLEWOOD it F r `t:$4i Et 1r i +,r,.i, cSd$X,y, x' .: % t•Lr?.:: t7, 10/1/1 192/16/17 co T N N qt N 0 qt c Lo co co co Ln co 134/.11/12., 134/ 1 1 / 12 tt 58./5/558./5/5 N cv N cc) r-- N L O In N co cy) N W Z W J Q Q W. CIO W H I WW, 0 r-- Lo r- N N 00 4 M 1r- aa/a /a ss /a /a 268/22/24 279/24/24 101 9 9 PROJECT LOCATION AMOCO STATION DRIVEWAY AND INTERSECTION- VOLUMES MAPLEWOOD 321/26/27 230/19/19 31 AAW p'n m-- - - - sw- s H E1VCtNElR51 ARCHRECTS /PLANNERS tt N cv N cc) N In I. N cy) NNM M o0 N cy) PROJECT LOCATION AMOCO STATION DRIVEWAY AND INTERSECTION- VOLUMES MAPLEWOOD 321/26/27 230/19/19 31 AAW p'n m-- - - - sw- s H E1VCtNElR51 ARCHRECTS /PLANNERS JOHN J. KENNA REAETOR 212 iII)N'EST I'I:UI•:RAL 111AX;. Veit) i•;, i --Ii -' m KTlt a. r ItictI.It'r •I:.`.t:i•;aiY,ti•r sT. I' I'I., INIENI '. 4iu101 APPRAISALS I I September 19 , 1989 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 Fast. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55149 SEP 2 0 1989 EWrAI3I.04111HO IN lE3Kfi PHONE: 222- 5l481S RE: Amoco Oil proposal, 11th & white Bear Avenue impact on the adjoining residential properties. Dear Mr. Olson: At your request.I have considered the proposal mentioned above, as you described. Also considered are the impacts of a smallerofficeprojectandamultiplefamilyresidentialuse. ASSUMPTIONS 1. That the proposal does meet.all set back requirements, 2. That the landscaping is designed to provide a reasonable bufferbetweenthesubjectpropertyandtheresidentialpropertysouth of the site, including fences. 30 That signs and lights on the property are in accordan ce withth city ordinances. 4. That all normal precautions regarding pollution of air and land are considered. 5. That the proposed station is not open 24 hours and not a facility for auto repair and storage. 6. There will be no outdoor audio advertising, g 7. That an auto service station with 2 dispensers is allowed underthepresentlanduseplan. 8. That the proposed project exceeds the normally allowed of gas dispensers Y wed number P and includes a single car wash which is also not allowed. 9.. That a neighborhood shopping center or office building' ould be an allowed use under the present land use plan. 32 Attachment 12 f JOHN KENNA REAETOR 212 tiilI)K E)AT FEDERAL F3LIX. R1-.* ALI . I: .STA'r l -. 1U) F.. FIvrIi taiTItEF:"rI2 I Itc I >I;Ir r' tit.,c: t:titl:tiT ST. PAT.'L, MINN. 4-15101 EwrAiBumi m IN isso PHONE: 222 -5885 September 19, 1989 Mr.. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development Page.2 1.0. That a multiple family use (apartments or townhomes) would be allowed under the present land use plan. 11 The present zoning is Farm /Res.idential (single family),, y), COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DEVELOPMENT In analyzing the information*available'it becomes obvious that any of the allowed uses for the commercial development of the property are going to cause a depreciation in the value of the adjoining and near by residential tracts. The land use in this area is becoming more commercial and that is to be expected with Highway 36 just south. White Bear Avenue has become a route to Maplewood Mall to the north. A project like the mall normally causes commercial interest in the surrounding areas. Other businesses in this area are also causing a higher traffic count. This traffic count will naturally bring interest I n commercial development. The land use plan may be contributing to the. roblem bP y not continuing the commercial use to the south. No natural buffer exists between the designated commercial and residential land use. If the business usage was extended south along White Bear Ave.. the other properties would have alternatives as the residential value decreases. Under the present plan the least negative impact on the. e adjoining homes would be a small office building, Typical office hours of 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM would not create the evening trafficandnoiseoftheproposedservicestation. From.a developerspers vlew the return on investing in an office building may not be as attractive and may reduce the value of the and. This area is in the midst of a predictable transition to commercial development. Many other residential dwellings alongWhiteBearAvenueareexperiencingthesamenegativesituationn intheresidentialvalue. Though an office use would probably causethe. least, all the considered commercial or business uses willresultinadegreeofdepreciationtothesinglefamilydwellings, g y ellings. 33 IN ele KENNA 111 1.A E'T 011 2Ai. 212 MIDWEST ~ iEi . . F- WrAni.xmuED zri 1Hl43fI I2I•:.i[. E'ST.k'rl; 50 I:. FIi --rII S T H EwF.T 11111C)NE: 22'2 -P 8mgI'12O1'1:I2'r" t,v.c;I;.tl;v•rT. ]PAT ... "1., NiIN:`'.lUl September 19, 1989 Mr. Geoff Olson Dixecfor Of Communit Y Deve Page. 3 Iopment MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT A multiple family use such as townhomes or apartments are notknowntocausedepreciationonmedium • This t Priced single family homes. type of use would likely be the best alternativenative far the area A f it is to remain a residential district in the future. According to the information you provided the likely zoningwouldallowmediumdensityapartmentsortownhouses. TPabout25apartmentunit his would townhomes, s with 5 unit buildings or 17 There may not be enough developer g land at the proposed site to inter. per in townhouses which't interest a ypically include some lawn andrecreationareasaswe11asvisit ' no 5 unit a artmen or Parking. There are .virtuallyPtbuildingsbuilttodayinareascomthesubject, land and construction parable to adjoining land were n costs won t permit it. Ifavailableandthealloweddensitwerincreaseditwouldbecomesomewhat e hat more. attractive. CONCLUSION Consideration should be ivg en to the long term use of theentirearea. While 'it is unlikelylikely that a single developer wouabletonegotiatewiththenu ld be tuber of individual owners, the firstparceldevelopedmaysetthedirection • for the remainder. In myopinionthe ,.highest and best use of t ' he White Bear Avenue franta eisnotsinglefamilyresidences, gThelandvalueswarrantamoreproductiveuseofthearea, The Amoco entirely out of lace proposal would not bePinthislocationnorwoulditnecesscauseanegativeinfluenceonthefutarily tracts, ure development of other If you require additional informationnformation ar have any questionsPleaseadvise. Respectfully submitted, ohn T. Kenna 34 I Action by Council MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO City Manager Modified .......... 1 FROM: Director of Community Development Re'ectedSUBJECT: JBanonNewFuelStations DATE: October 16, 1989 Date INTRODUCTION The City Council, on October 12, proposed that • motor fuel stat ionsbedeletedfromthezoningcode. The effect of this change wouldbetoprohibittheconstructionofanynewmotor I fuel stationsExistingstationswouldbe11grandfathered" in as nonconf orming - uses and could continue to operate. City Code requires aconditionalusepermittoexpandanonconforminguseand a findingthat "There would not be a significant effect on the developmentof.the parcel as zoned." The City Council adopted the motor fuel station ordinance onSeptember11, 1989,o The purpose of this ordinance4 is to retheuseandlocationionofmotorfuelstations DISCUSSION Staff concurs that motor fuel stations are a unique and potentially troublesome use, especially around residential uses, This is why the City recently adopted a special ordinance toregulatetheiruseandlocation.. In order to ban new motor fuel stations, the City Attorney feelsthatthereneedstobeatietopublichealthandwelfare. Since we just passed an ordinance establishing conditions i * n whichmotorfuelstationscanbeallowed, 't would be difficult to justify a ban in terms of public health, safety or welfare. TherearealsonewFederalandStateregulationsdealingwithundergroundtanksandleaks. It would be particularly hard tojustifyhownewstationsmeetingournewordinance . could be foundtobeworsethanotherconditionaluses , such as public garages or ausedcarlots. many of the new stations are. well designed andlandscaped, such as the new FINA station on White Bear Avenue andCountyRoadB. It is even more difficult to ban stations on the basis that theCityfeelsthatthereisnoneedformorestations.. The courtcaseof 'Metro 500 versus Brooklyn Park found that a City may notdenyausesimplybecausetheyfeelthattherearetoomanyof 'aparticulartypeofuse. In the Brooklyn Park case there werethree , astationsononecorner. Metro 500 pplied for . a conditionalusepermitforthe. fourth corner and was denied by the City on thebasisthatthereweretoomanystationsononecorner. The courtruledinfavorofMetro500, SENT BY: BANN I GAN AND KELLY.' ELLY ; 10 -16 -89 4. • 34PM 6122238019 --) BANNIGAN & KELLYt P.A. AYTortNEY3 AT LAW 400 MIDWEST FEDriRAL BUILDING OYU AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 53101 6 12) 224-2781 JOHN F. RAMNIOAN. jpti PATRICK J, KIILLLY JAMI'a JANET M. WIL98 #91 October 16 1989 Mr. Geoff o1wn Director of Co i . Fl g . 1830 East County. Road B Maplewood, MN'5510'9 RE: Motor Fuel Station 612 7'?04597 ; # 2 FAX «1 g) =3 -8019 Agar Mr. olsoni Pursuant to our telephone conversation you asked the foll owing; is it possible to eliminate motor fuel StAttipns by ordinance? Answer; NQ. For verification of research I have cont Fled the League of MinnesotaChios. There are no ordinances in eaastence that totalty eliminates motor fuel stations fromamunicipalitybasedsolelyonthetheoryofnuisanceorharmfulactivity, The controlstandardsforhazardousundergroundthatarecurrentlyreguistedandgovernedbyE.P.A., star regulations and state statutes. Motor fuel stations, a use pursuant to zoning regulations may be regulated andcontrolled. Courts have consistently upheld regulation by zoning because of the nexus withpublic, health and safety. Elimination of motor fuel stations other than by zoning may expose the municipalitytocommerceclauseviolationsandrestraintoftradeviolations. RespectfultY submitted, BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. Patrick J. Kelly PJK:Cd Action by. Councir, nx °., MEMORANDUM Moth TO City Manager Re j ectea FROM: Director of Communitynity DevelopmentSUBJECT: Date Seasons Park Preliminary latDATE; yOctober161989 The .City Council tabled actionn on a request forapprovalforSeasonsPark. Council preliminary plat questions: re quested information on two 1. Should the Cit y participatee in the .costs of improvements, the Off-site as requested by the develo p er ? 2. Are the deeds rantin easement o g g th e City a permanent. ver the north 33 feet of the road right-of '' propertyY valid? Memos, from the Director of Public Works and Cityrespondingtothesequestions Attorne Yareattached, MEM04 Attachments: 1. Memo: Director of Public Works2. Memo: City Attorney3StaffReport: October 2, 1989 AGENDA REPORT FROM: „ .;'l. "f ".y Engineer Att c c:r.:! Is <z report by the level o er s engineer that es'k z mgt esthecostn-f in-st A l 1 :i. ng the recommended pond out l et nananalyss addition g . watersheds i s presented., Basedth-i s an'a ! } i `r the developeroper has SUggested l i n c:c..ct ! e p tt ing the pond Wit i ty . The analysis in. the report. wasper +ni -rxied c- r-ording to accepted engineering t ncl r~ds and dop. sr.Jn+ l rm.. that. nne -Mh.a 1 + the rUnof f comes rom c i t ro erYRp tyx zany proposed- clevel capments re .ir .. . t aratd F ,. :. q , drainage improvements th.: l r r c :.. c uts i de tine deve 1 oper- s property SO n thedeveloper has been re U i red past, the q to constrUCt storm sewer toAdeqtc 't : e ! } serve his site. The city his c ' y scat participatedinthecost . +or draining areas Outside the ro .cisp e d d cj v e 1 o p m en t o P::GH c Attachment d 2 t - SCHOELL. & MADSON INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS r...- SOIL TESTING 10550 WAYZAT'A BOULEVAR0 M,NNETONKA, MN 55343 -5482 612) 54Er -7601 FAX 16121546-9065 October 4, 1989 Mr. Mario Cocchi arel la Sherman- Boosal i s Companies I P.O. Box 1482 Minneapolis, MN 55440 -1482 Subject:. Seasons Park Addition to Maplewood Dear Mario: The estimated cost of constructing storm sewer from the pond in the p ark to the pond southwest of the Gervai s /Kennard intersection is as follows: Estimated Construction Cost $16,545 See attachment for details) Contingencies (10 %) 12655 Engineering 29500 Total Estimated Cost $20,700 The construction cost is based on using 12 -inch diameter PVC pipe for storm sewer and seed with mulch restoration in the park. Attached is an aerial contour plan indicating the areas tributary to the pond in the park. Normally, drainage improvements are considered to benefi t all properties within the corresponding watershed and the cost5 of the improvements are shared. on a pro rata basis based on the runoff from each property.: Runoff i's directly proportional. to the product of the land area (A) and runoff coeffi ci ent C). Following is a tabulation of the areas and runoff coefficients for the properties tributary to the park pond. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION • EGUAL- OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER J I SCHOELL.. & MADSON, INC. Mr. Mario Cocchi arel !a -2- October 4 1989 Area, A Average Runoff % of Property Ir Water- hc d La cres Coefficient, C CA Total CA Season Park Addition to Map l ewood Subdivision 3.33 0.48 1.60 33.7 City Park 9.24 0026 2.50 50.7 Church 1.98 0.31 0.61 12.9 Area North. of Subdivision 0.49 0.26 0.13 2.7 15.04 4.74; 100.0 The cost of the storm sewer outlet from the pond should be shared based on the above percentages. It ,s likely not feasible to obtain participation from the church and area north of the subdi vi son and those costs would have to be paid by either the City or Sherman- Boosal i s. Please. contact us if you have any. questions. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & h1ADSON, INC. Kenneth Adolf 4 SCHOELL & NAADSONIINC. Job No. ENGINEERS * SURVEYORS PLANNERS Da Sheet .—of- S.0IL TESTING Project F By Subject. Ck'd I-V-111 - I cc7—/ All P 7- ect' 7 C C QOCT,10A) C05r . 0 V16 ZI 00 1 too q C? r 2 AAS C 7 G. 5 -, ocy 2 100 Pi LAA)L 70 L. __. 1 - - -- g __771 4 a DO CO I-V-111 - I cc7—/ All P 7- ect' 7 C C QOCT,10A) C05r . 0 BY 4 j X22 *'S w --awe c.:,. a>,c. i''• _ - r..N .n.+. w ""`.ita t Rn 1 w. u'Cd'Z 4 its r 'at l t 1f.2.. ,,..._.. ....... A . Mi Mi nnaso t. VIC c aiA«#1 .,J...__...._/.,...... tin 1 1 a 1 Co oratf on 106 q V 1&4141 of d .._..._..... .. .._......./a.r.,..,.,......row ZD a c.r r-y++'+r l h.0S w v "itg r 11, 41 1„ ue v' the 314 t o v% i Jw t"ttp of !Aa 'o+rl ' , r rh ei ifM ,Irt t >! f t #c r+l NNri, 1+ ..w i lrrt l vt the vll' fit t h m .c w nA vt rl+ the rvre44 u l"M* N Y / . L...................1... ,., r>» t, uJAAI ,Klttl its.. ,uid .t1. ## r 1 i +rt i h Ni+!/Cl i +'d, 4,......a._....rll rtv r* Oru t. ckpea A , cKjrt p .+. a R rt G ivA tt 440 Ak r I Ahl Many P/ 4 tic KSJ r rte ttt puares '! nwli • F1 ra.+tT, u LIAR mrl,,....Orr Jw. "M.a..JJ Lucwat! i brwxa. lot 11.41 coo ld f . n na t asr v ,.f ra a, i:.•,r d a Jd mat, t rtait r s ;L man *ht Staeatt 1Ln Voa rigtiti oari tt nt aver, I under, acres and 1 Qwg11 the fo:Icwfnq: Ths north VI rttiy thm (33) faex of t.Me !torts+ one -half (1/2) of tha 44im ant -half EsJ2; of Lot 3 Ea G. oVsr! Sd!`otl 1 Lem. 1) , : 1 ~f `D s ` u 5 i 3T3 r iNrrr'h ij,, i'• -• ..,ate,, , r r.a .. a. 1t" 1/(( 1 M ' • L11 Ty t Gr j ua,• .i ..a N,Mrinl A 'I ZA1 4iii it1 Y43 , • IT SAW' AV714LD SO fiii; 02013 $ wj& m t+ ptr 267-22?* T4 Zug 47* W b ite WCA . 140 kwwju4 wm&*Ad uw& tAxw4 t y41"W kx o 6cla+¢i r esleysotrs ta>iL , Iwr ., snid 1 y pt r memmd p%rd, tart nwomjwn O In C:Uftr=? tstsl. ?A +zSd f tf , ;CPO Pam Ye t tt Way tF and yru r "Amm uvi#AAP. a p1wimex-ve Ur zn Calw+t y 0y .......... tl ++ Y' .,•....Y , ». dry .. .__ ....Y....._.._.:..,.......,.. l.._. a!+l' mow•. v "' .. 1 itD.i d t rrone.lt s,rO aawa.. ....++aw . wsw.- •....... w....r. _....... ..rwvw,t...ra.s. a.. .. ....r... •. •....ra.rt ...... w.. . rw Jai .t,.tiu•a lc. f., the f+crim. wW Icho 'Favaull•I ths famfelwt tteatruni volt, I ...._._ _. „ .,.,...__.....,.....— 4xd oe'imakrdod 1610 +,sale hs.• .. yprN ue't e+ 1/*"1d_..__.........,.,. .. ,....,.,...:...........,.. LAA t*w M*rw1 TrGte.l 'i r4T "W _ 404 First i 1 dust Bids. ri Pti. , vtlur jvimc L A:L.1,9tyi. tS'Ji4 „1ty os wtil'a rJtarr Rai :ter man. 1%w ofto 1< ft-m $=wand -040 +MW" w 1w wr .ftma to ;16;..; fl. •- 7 61'2"'7704.597; # i s In C:Uftr=? tstsl. ?A +zSd f tf , ;CPO Pam Ye t tt Way tF and yru r "Amm uvi#AAP. a p1wimex-ve Ur zn Calw+t y 0y .......... tl ++ Y' .,•....Y , ». dry .. .__ ....Y....._.._.:..,.......,.. l.._. a!+l' mow•. v "' .. 1 itD.i d t rrone.lt s,rO aawa.. ....++aw . wsw.- •....... w....r. _....... ..rwvw,t...ra.s. a.. .. ....r... •. •....ra.rt ...... w.. . rw Jai .t,.tiu•a lc. f., the f+crim. wW Icho 'Favaull•I ths famfelwt tteatruni volt, I ...._._ _. „ .,.,...__.....,.....— 4xd oe'imakrdod 1610 +,sale hs.• .. yprN ue't e+ 1/*"1d_..__.........,.,. .. ,....,.,...:...........,.. LAA t*w M*rw1 TrGte.l 'i r4T "W _ 404 First i 1 dust Bids. ri Pti. , vtlur jvimc L A:L.1,9tyi. tS'Ji4 „1ty os wtil'a rJtarr Rai :ter man. 1%w ofto 1< ft-m $=wand -040 +MW" w 1w wr .ftma to ;16;..; fl. •- 7 61'2"'7704.597; # MEMORANDUM To City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Gervais Avenue APPLICANT: Sherman- Boosalis Interests, Inc. PROJECT: Seasons Park Addition to Maplewood DATE: October 2, 1989 SUMMARY DISCUSSION Trees In spite of the fact that virtually all of the existing on -site vegetation will be eliminated to accommodate the subdivision, there is very little opportunity, given the shape and dimensions of the property, to reduce the loss of trees. The only options available to minimize such losses include closer conformance of the Flandrau Street .grades to existing topography and the enlargement of lots. The density guarantee provision of the Environmental Protection Ordinance, however, precludes the loss of lots to save vegetation. While most vegetation is not.of the highest quality, any preservation would have a positive impact on lot values. Demont Avenue Lots Lot B could be divided into two new lots fronting on to Demont Avenue. While this would .reduce the privacy enjoyed.by 2522 Flandrau and 1694 Demont, there is adequate width on the undeveloped Demont Avenue right --o f -way for a driveway, The fire code will require a 12- foot - wide, all weather.driveway, since a house would be further than 150 feet from the street. In addition, there are water- service stubs for two additional lots on Lot "B ". Lots "A" and "B" are proposed to be retained by the two current owners and not sold to the developer. This is why these two lots were not.included in the plat. RECOMMENDATION Approve the preliminary plat for Seasons Park Addition to Maplewood subject to the following conditions being satisfied: 1, Approval of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street.plans by the City Engineerr. 2. The grading plan shall include a proposed building dgp elevation.and.contour information for each homesite as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize rading g on sites which contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted b the CitY Y Engineer, provided the intent.of the overall grading plan is I with. 3. submit a signed Developer's.Agreement with required suretyY for all required public improvements, erosion control and tree planting to the City Engineer, includin g an eight-foot-.. wide trail on the recommended easement, south of Lot 20. 4. 5. 6. Approval of a tree removal and planting of Community Development before grading begins or final plat approval is.given. illustrate the trees that are to be remi to be retained and those that are to be Revisions to the future Flandrau Street rof ile to conformp more closely to the natural grade and allow for some tree preservation. Provision of a 12- foot -wide trail easement from ro osedpP Flandrau Street on or along the south line of Lot 20 to. provide a subdivision connection to Four. Seasons Park. An eight- foot -wide asphalt trail to be installed by the developer. plan to the Director or construction This plan must oved, those that are replanted. 2 7. Provide an outlet for the pond.west of the plat, with appropriate easements to a confirmed City storm drainage system. REFERENCE Site Description The subject property consists of 6.55 acres, having a north /south dimension of 1, 12 5 feet and an east /west dimension of 330 feet for that portion of.the site lying northerly of Victory in Christ Free Lutheran Church. The.property has 195 feet of frontage on Gervais Avenue. It has undulating topography with a high elevation of nearly 940 on.the north end and low elevations of around 916 on or near proposed Lots 6 and.13. The northerly end of the.site drains south and easterly to a small wetland that appears on the air photos as, perhaps, a Type 3 Wetland The center of the site consists of a small pothole that has no outlet. Neither are protected wetlands but the Watershed District has expressed a concern about filling the Type 3 in a manner that would decrease storage volume. Protecting of this wetland for storage could eliminate Lot 13, Vegtation A considerable amount of the site is wooded, especially that portion lying north of the church. The south end of the property near Gervais Avenue is also wooded. Two larger oaks stand immediately east of the church parking lot and both are proposed to be saved. Much of the on -site vegetation consists of - cottonwood /poplar and box elder but there appear to be several and perhaps many oaks that should be incorporated with the subdivision. No specific tree information is available upon which..to make an assessment of valuable trees to be lost. The developer proposes to grade nearly the entire site which will result in the loss of virtually all vegetation. Surrounding Land Use North: A single- family residence West:. Four Seasons Park and Victory in Christ Free Lutheran Church South: Industrial Fast: Vacant with single -- family adjacent to Gervais Avenue. The property to the east is the site of a proposed 426 -unit apartment project, currently under litigation. 3 PLANNING Comprehensive Plan Desianations The Comprehensive . Plan calls for RL- l ow- -density residential development for the subject property. It is surrounded on the west by P-park; north by OS -open space; east by LSC- -1 irnited service commercial; and south by BW- business warehouse. The open space designation connects the wetlands to the east with Four Seasons Park. Zoning The subject property is zoned R -1, single - family residential as is the property immediately to the west Properties to the east are zoned LBC and R -1 (near Gerva i s Avenue) . Lands to the north are zoned R -1 and to the south M -1. The proposed development meets all zoning ordinance requirements. Street Access to Lot "B" Section.9 -1 of City Code states that "no building permits will be issued for any construction within the City, unless the building site is located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and maintained as a City street, or unless provision for street construction has been made in full compliance with this Code, and in no case.until grading work, as provided in this Code, has been completed and certified to the clerk.by the city engineer; except that, in isolated instances, the Council may enter into an agreement with a property owner for special. handling of an unusual situation,.which agreement shall be recorded so as to run with the land affected." The key word in this section is "adjacent ". Lt is not defined in the ordinance. The dictionary defines it as follows: Close to; lying near. 2, Next to; adjoining." A house on Lot "B" would be close to Flandrau Street and Demont Avenue, but would not adjoin. Courts generally use the most permissive definition when there is doubt TRAFFIC The subject property will have access to Gervais Avenue which is designated as a Major Collector by the Comprehensive Plan. Gervais Avenue has more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional residential trips. 4 mb \Seasons . mem Attachments : 1. Neighborhood Land Use Plan 2 . Property line/zoning mapp3PreliminaryPlat 4. Ramsey- Wa- shington Metro Watershedershed Dlstrlot letter5. Resolution 5 Interchange princ Interchange 111! 11110.11 1pal arterial 694 Vad.nais Heights i SIC M IN AR in u a it in iff waygm n r a r ar ®er irr i poi nCo. R D t collector BW VRBI 00 major ,,,,. 1a) 10collectorAo «•r.cwoop 4- elor collector _ p - co - ml or a erlaiLqf ! S I SC j r Qz A _ BW L._.. + + . R m r pc Q Ra ri RIL Z Q ot. rto ' i CA , t J M R L1. I 'J . LSC ' I Rm 1 • L,. S • 111 1 OSo . W C J SC• RNisoror —p 1 LS 0 RL Major cols `+ r + t 1 t R- _ 4 t IMwinu,r,p.,p n R L . QO c W ,. fir` , .. c t t ) ± tLSC. HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN no Attachment 1 N allp4Ivrynn1 c 1 c C, fi n e r h a e9 46- C 0 m c o L. m 0 m E c HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN no Attachment 1 N GS) c•... fn 1 ( Ini is 76 ac 37i 11 5)M l 4) t2 It 0 0 06) 38) 13 L J 10 t22. 4 244) E 44 ) IS? r) rp 9 (i n 1s 410) ca Z, t"3 ,o V is P L j "I d LW Ib m e 7 t _ l too ioa r t e5 14 _ o a i i .L... Qso. i42) 1 a QV list 34.15 Olt 1a ...... S rd, JF A -T 330-SID, - oa •c . 3 12.1 tic 3 •t P. APL woao 2 37 me 1 2 3 4 5 Ir S7 BAC)OKS ^ ^vr L t o 1 '10 .9 e 040 t) oz m s • 1 0 8 tO 0c O % ni BC e5, 8 03 w.19, 1.17 • . 3 9 Z) As 4 i s-4 7.71 a.ss u o QQ23) o L.So acf0v 050 O fig, ono :. Gt! » _ • K c 30) d4 7 2 - AVE. ° 1 •' ~' s li S• 3+) 4 s 6 -7 3 (35) (3G) (3 *7) t !) *Z- 4411 ('41) (40) (W) (38) Ji 3 12 II lD 9 w=,jw a 0 c- O ' o c3 0 mamma S ( 4.93 ac. I.60 TAQoto (4.) o L 0 030 oz t7 l 135 y i s ®r ®t ii to ua s at 'it o r _ .nt Y ir! 1^.6D t. 331•itS' - all. 3 i i I MW 4(.Sazs 1412,619, too* 321-1s, 1 7 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Attachmentacent 2 1 _ a • — .c it 4 A r tr 1 O C, N C• qw s VI . • s 1 I T cn op 1 t 3 :• ! • it • bi it ,` t !' ! 1 •, e g 1 . i i • r Z 1 •• } S• ! +• Its d N o o Y ° r7 Mt)Nr r t lot ' Pttachmcnt 3 Geoff Olson Midboard Community Development Department 1830 E. Co. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Seasons Park Addition At Gervai s and Flandrau Street Dear Geoff: 2785 White Bear Ave., Suite 210 iV' aplewe o ct f Mn. 5.5109 612)779 - 2207 Thank -unu for referring the above mentioned project for Watershed District review. I have examined the plans and the property and have several comments regarding the proposal. M first comment is in regard to the proposed storm sewer extension leading to the pondYgPP on the southeast side of the site. The illustration of the storm sewer plan shows the storm sewer outletting at an elevation of approximately 918. We would require that the storm sewer be extended to the normal level of the pond which. appears to be more in the area of 914. we do not have a normal level on this pond and would rely on your office or public works to establish this elevation. My second concern is in re and to the proposed filling of the small wetland on the northeast comer of the site. Although small in size, we have identified this as a Type 3 Wetland The district is concerned about filling of .any proposed wetlands of type 3, 4, and 5..Our primary. concern is to insure that adequate storm -water storage volumes are maintained within the sub watershed. Our recently completed Phalen Chain of Lakes drainage plan requires a total of 192 acre feet of storage within this sub watershed. Before allowing this wetland Billing we would want to be assured that this storage volume is maintained. The project would require a Watershed District permit for grading and plat approval; the permit application s enclosed for the applicant. A copy will also be mailed to Sherman Boosalis Companies. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns regarding our comments. Sincerely, Clifton . Aichinger Administrator Attachment 4 i SUBDIVISION CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Sherman - Boosalis Interests, Inc. applied.for a variation from the subdivision code for the following- -described property The east 1/2 of Lot 31 S.A. Rogers Garden Lots WHEREAS , Section 30-8 (f) (1) (a) (2) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires at least 60 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 33 feet of frontage, requiring a variation of 27 feet. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this variation is as follows 1. This variation was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on September, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said variation be 2. The Maplewood City. Council held a public hearing on 1989 to consider this variation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above- described variation be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. There is an unusual hardship on the land. 20 The. variation would not adversely effect the plan and spirit of the subdivision ordinance. Attachment 5 10 j Planning Commission.-5- Minutes 9- -18 --89 Cha irm n Axdahl asked for comments f ram , the public.. There w re. no comments. Commission r Fischer moved the Planning ommission recommend: 1. Approval f the resolution rezo ing all but the. northerly 5, 000-square-.f eet., s determined by survey, of of 6 from R -1 to -1. 20 Approval of t e resolution pproving a conditional use permit for one year, bj ect to the following conditions: a. A bufferyard of n t less than 10 feet in width shall b 1 Gated and maintained along the east and s th property lines of Lot 6 and the north y zoning boundary. Within the buf ferya o . mechanical equipment may be operated r la dscape materials stared. b. Access to he Gomm rcial portion of Lot 6 shall be from Maple ood Drive, not Kohlxnan Avenue. c. The h urs of operatio shall be lim ited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday. d. S rage shall.be limited to the southerly M p rt i on of Lot 6, Koh l ma.n ' s Lakeview ddition, as determined.b survey. Commiss' ner Sletten seconded Ay -- Axdahl, Aye s, Barrett, Car final , F'iol a , Fischer, Sletten E. Preliminary Plat: Seasons Park Secretary Olson presented the staff report for preliminary plat approval for 20 . single - family lots Chairman Axdahl asked for comments from the public. John Oswald, owner. of Lot A, said the City put a sewer and water line on his property without any easement, rights. Mr. Oswald then sold this property to the City for $1. t Planning Commissionion -6- Minutes 9- 18-89 John Cavanaugh, owner of Lot B, said ' a deed for an easement . was filed in 19760, Mr. Cavanaugh said he was assessed for water service when the water. service was stubbed in. 'Mr. Cavanaugh said the neighbors to the north would not agree to.an :easement. Mario Cocchiarella, representing the developer Sherman -- Boosalis Interests, Inc., said they will plan the grading to save as many trees as possible. Mr. Cocchia.rella ..said a plan for the drainage may be to divert the water into the pond and back into Flandrau Street to reduce the flow of storm water and make this a feasible project. Mr. eocchiarella asked that the. developer who develops the adjoining property be required to install some kind of a screen between the properties) Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recommend:.' A. Approval of the resolution which approves a variation to Section 30.8 (f) (1) (a) (2) of City code to allow Lot "B" to have 33 feet of frontage on Demont Avenue, rather than the 60 feet required by ordinance. Approval is on the basis that: 1. There is an unusual hardship on the land. 2. The variation would not adversely effect the plan and spirit of the subdivision ordinance B. Approval of the preliminary plat for seasons Park Addition to Maplewood, subject to the following conditions being satisfied 10 Approval of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans by the City Engineer. 2 The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each homesite as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites which contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with.. 1? Planning Commission ~7_ Minutes 9--18 -89 3. Submit a signed Developer's Agreement with required surety for all required public improvements,.erosion control and tree planting to the City Engineer,..including an eight- foot -wide trail on the recommended easement, south of Lot 20. 4 A pP roval of a tree removal and planting plan to the Director of Community Development before grading or construction begins or final plat approval is given. This plan must illustrate the trees that are to be removed, those that are to be retained and those that are to be replanted. 5, Revisions to the future Flandrau Street profile to conform more closely to the natural grade and allow for some tree preservation* 60 Provision of a 12 -foot -wide trail.easement from proposed Flandrau Street on or along the south line of Lot 20 to provide a subdivision connection to Four Seasons Park.. An eight foot -wide asphalt trail to be installed by the developer. 7. Provide an outlet for.the pond west of the plat, with appropriate easements to.a confirmed City storm drainage system* Commissioner Sletten seconded Commissioner Fischer moved to amend the motion amending: A. Approve the resolution which allows construction of a house on an unimproved street and approves a variation to Section 3 0.8 (f) 1) (a) ( of City code to allow Lot "B" to have 33 feet of frontage on Demont Avenue, rather than the 60 feet required by ordinance. Commissioner Sletten seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Sletten 13 Action by Counoi l.v Endorsed Modified MEMORANDUM e j ected,,. TO: City Manager Date. FROM Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Appeal of Review Board Fencing Requirement LOCATION: 2714 Highwood Avenue APPLICANT/ OWNER. Harold Carver PROJECT TITLE: Metal Storage Building DATE October 17, 1989 4110 i Z_4 INTRODUCTION Mr.. Carver is appealing the Community Design Review Board's requirement for the installation of an 80- foot -long screening fence on the west side.of his new metal.storage building. Mr. Carver feels that since the building was constructed at 'a lower grade elevation.than originally planned, it is not.very visible from the neighbor's property to the west and, therefore, should not warrant the construction of the screening fence. The applicant also feels that the existing evergreens to the west of the Cellular /One tower site driveway are providing adequate screening. (Refer to the letter on page 6,) BACKGROUND On February 14, 1989, the Community Design Review Board approved plans.for this metal storage building. Condition four required- of a screening fence along the west side of the building to. screen the building from the adjacent neighbor. On April 24., 1989, the City Council granted a conditional use permit to allow this building. On September 12, 1989, the Board denied Mr. Carver's request to have the requirement for the screening fence waived. CODE REQUIREMENT Subsection 36 -153 (2fl)f requires that a conditional use permit may..be obtained for metal buildings in a BC, Business Commercial district, but it must be found that the building would be substantially screened to be 800 opaque as viewed from streets or residentially zoned land. DISCUSSION The_, screening requirement should not be waived, based on theordinance. Even with the lower grade of the building, approximately 60% of the building is . still visible from 2684Highwood , Avenue. Staff does not feel however, that a fence is necessarily the only alternative for a screen or buffer, If the applicant is willing to substitute lantin spg instead of constructing the fence, evergreen trees could be P lamed west ofthebuildingtoprovidescreeningthatwouldrowtallereach Y ear. With plantings, ho wever, enough would have to be put in so as to provide a, screen that is at least 800 opaque andsix- feet - tall.. Some grade modification may be needed asY well to create a flat area for planting. RECOMMENDATION Mr. Carver shall provide screening as previously required, Y q, exceptforthemodificationthatevergreensmaybeagyplantedlntstead. In either case, the screening shall be at least six- feet -tall and 800 Opaque upon installation and shall run . the 8'0-foot-length --len th as previously required. TE CARVER Attachments 1,0 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Site Plan 4. Applicant's letter of appeal dated September 19 1989P , 2 mm for colltvc I or RL S E 4 Qw "a ftm "m 8 mm wow ftmVOr0 I%OC.% Ot RLCO s R L . CD m noLL 011e c IlAiar-calfacrt T as w im )w 0 0 Inor C0110C )r R l.. minor O S r Collec7or Inor collector C1 1 c fi va Do m uk *4 'w Ew K w7w Iw VW ilecic .r cc 1 ` S C RSchool Scarch Aroa 112 hill© Radlus 0 0 CIS r , x . HIGIIWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 3 Pd f O 4,0 - 7M- 0 IM 12- It IN-= C& A V t V13 ,- toy -- D two' 1"7• ot4 -4 vc IL Jv A0 1 fir t• t • a t t t 0 1 t J t t • Cr U e r O r Z? 47 41 it PROPERIY L ZONING MA P Li ` Attachment 2 i 3 y t . o 148 . ol e O _ i• I l p. l SITE PLAN 5 . L11 l 2 G 0`9 V At Lac:IiE eii t. 3 f, I COMPLETE AU-TOMOTIVE FACILITIES B00'y WORK • PAINTING 40 FRAME WORK Em,;iNc • TRANSMISSION BRAKES *SLOPE wpRK CARVER GENERAL REPAIR. INC. 2730 HIGHWOOD AVENUE ST PAUL. MINNESOTA 551 19 6) 2) 73 1.9655 / 739.1 265 AUTO BODY: (61 2) 739 -3496 9>,1cMaplewoodCommunityDesignDetember1P 89ReviewBoard 1830 Ef County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Gentlemen: I would like to appeal the '"ept. 12 , 1989 r_ e vJL CW boards decision on the eighty foot fence, on t e wes t side of Harold L. Carvers storage -e buildin gT. YoLr own staff has .inspected the property, agreeing the fence would serve no ..beneficial screening. The existirl -; evergreen trees provide subs tans ial screening. Therefore I would like the matter Rereviewed. FOR: Harold L. Carver Robert J . Carver 6 Attachment 4 Community Design Review Board --5 Minutes 9- -12 -89 a Permitting this sign would set a f or the precedent prol iferation of additional signs of this type by the other tenant in this auto center\ This would be cont r Y to the. intent of the !`gn code,. which re Tres comprehen ive.sign.plans or multi- tenant centers to \avoid differ' ng types of signsns and sign clutter,* bol The proposed sign uld not be compatible in design and mate s with the two approved pylon signs. 2. Approval of the S logo n the front of the convenience stor one S logo may be used on the east side of t canopy, e revised open sign base for the pylon sign 1' permitted since it would allow enter driver vls bi:l ity of traffic and pedest ans. 30 Approva of the repainting of th front of the convenience store.as ro osepp d. Boardmember Molin seconded Aye --5 Nays - -1 E. Landscaping /Screening Appeal - Carver General Repair Robert Carver was present representing the applicant. Mr. Carver.said eight evergreen trees were planted. Staff said he had reviewed the site and the building is still visible from the neighbor's property. Marguerite Merz, the adjoining property owner, said the evergreen trees do not screen her property and she would like the fence installed. Ms. Merz said the existing.trees planted by the MCI tower developer do not provide enough screening. Ms. Merz said there is a steep embankment on the south and west as a result of the storage building and she feels it is a danger. Staff discussed the possible future problems i.f, the fence is installed on Ms. Merz's property and she sells the property at a later time. The board members discussed whether.. a fence would provide any screening since it.,would sit in .a low area. Secretary Ekstrand said he felt the fence would do some.good, but not enough to warrant a fence being required. Ms. Merz eked if trees could be planted in the place of a fence if the fence is not required. A board member said.the fence was a condition of approval .for the building and he felt it should be required. Boardm.ember Erickson moved the Review Board require a fence as required on February 14, 1989, and that the fence be placed on the west lot line of Mr. Carver's property. Boardmember Deans seconded Ayes - -4 Nays - -2 VI DESIGN REVIEW A. Olive Gar en Restaurant - Birch Run St ion Site Jerry Rich.a ds of General Mills was resent representing The olive Garden Rest rant. Mr. Richards said he had r viewed the conditio of the staff recommendation ' he was in'agr ement with them. Mr. Richards said tY plans were be ng reviewed at present and.the project s set to be n within the next few weeks. Boardmember Molin,m.ved ap oval of plans date- stamped August 22,1989, for the ive Garden Restaurant, subject to the follow ng conditions: 10 Approval of plans y the Community Design Review Board does.not c titute approval of a building permit. 2. All,trash dum tens s 11 be stored in screening enclosures wi h a 100% paque wooden gate and shall. be a c for and ma rial compatible with the building. nclosures she 1 be protected by concrete- f'lled steel pos or the equivalent, anchored 'n the ground at e front corners of the structur If the enclosur is masonry, the protect' e posts may be omit ed. 3. Any e erior building or roof - ounted equipment shal be decoratively screened and hidden from vie Screening is subject to Board approval. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat LOCATION: 22151. 22.17, 22191 2221 Woodlynn Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Mack Nettleton PROJECT: Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 4 DATE: September 12 , 1989 9"04MW4 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting preliminary and final plat approval tocreatefourtownhouselotsandanoutlotforabuildingunderconstruction. (See the plan on page 7. ) The four -unit townhouse structure has been constructed. This . plat is needed to allow each unit..to,have separate ownership, The outlot is forp the common driveway to access the units. The outlot will be owned andcontrolledbythehomeowners' a's.sociation. BACKGROUND April 22, 1985: The City Council conditionally approved a preliminary and final plat for the first of several four -unit townhouse structures that have been constructed by the applicant. December 81 1986: The City Council approved a reliminar latPYPforWoodlynnHeightsTownhomesNo. 2 subject to a number of conditions One of the conditions for final plat approvalWoodln P pP 1 of the y n.Heights Townhomes No. 2 was Sidewalks will be required along Woodlynn Avenue with any future platting." April 13, 1987: The City Council approved the Woodl ynn Heights N o 2 final plat . October 24, 1988: The City Council approved a preliminary and final plat for Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 3. The sidewalkdewalkinstallationrequirement (from the approval of the Woodlynn Heights Townho Y g mes No. 2) was waived with this plat as no development was immediately adjacent to that site and it was expected that a city -wide policy for financing sidewalk construction would be addressed soon after by the City Council, DISCUSSION Two issues need to-be resolved with this development prior to the approval of the final plat - site grading and drainage, and sidewalks. Grading and Drainaqe According to the City Engineerin Department, the propertyquestionhastopographic P p p Y in q and drainage problems which need to be corrected. It is recommended that the applicant successfullyresolvethegradingproblemsonthesitetothesatisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the City granting the final plat. 011 #a ,1T_, 7 1 "Ir A condition of approving the Woodl 2nnHeightsTownhouseNo. Plat was " Y g p sidewalks will be required along Woodlynn avenue with any future platting." Mr. Nettleton, however, believes that the property owners on the south side of.Woodlynn Avenue should participate in the cost. He is unwillin to commit to the construction of an • y sidewalk until the City Council discusses a city -wide policy for financing sidewalk construction, in review of the tape recordings of the December 8 1986 CityCouncilmeeting, it was found that Mr. Nettleton was told that sidewalks would be required by the City Council along he north psideofWoodlynn g Avenue in conjunction with development of the townhomes. This is because it was felt that the retail area to the west-of these -sites acts as a destination point for pedestrians in the area. Additionally, the segment of Woodlynn Avenue ad'7 oinin theg property in question is designated a collector street which should have a sidewalk on at least one side of the street. No sidewalks have been installed along this portion of Woodlynn Avenue to date. With.all this in mind, it now appears appropriate to have the applicant install a sidewalk along the north side of Woodlynn Avenue from McKnight Road to the west end of the Woodlynn Townhomes No. 3 development. This is so there will not be sidewalk segments which lead to nowhere or are not connected to other sidewalks when they are constructed. Additional sidewalks should be constructed with future plats. RECOMMENDATION A.. Approve of the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 4 preliminary plat subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval: 1 Resolution of the grading and drainage concerns on the property in question to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 20 A developer's agreement and cash escrow in a form and amount satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided to the City before final plat approval for the installation of a 5- foot -wide concrete sidewalk alon g the north side of Woodlynn Avenue from McKnight Road to the west property line of the Woodlynn Townhomes No. 3 development. B. Table the approval of the final plat until all of the conditions contained herein for the preliminary plat are met. 2 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Area .97 acres (42f468 square feet Existing land use: four -- unite townhouse structure Existing easements: NSP and Amoco easements are located on the north 207 feet of the site SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Undeveloped property, planned for RM, residential medium density use. East: a four -unit townhouse structure built.by the applicant. South: Woodlynn Avenue. Across the street are single dwellings, West: a four unit townhouse structure built by the a licant. pp PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: RM, residential medium . densit Y Zoning: R3, Multiple dwelling residential.district. Attachments 1. Location Map 20 Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Proposed Preliminary and Final Plat kenrmemo4 3 W 0 a J kE cr w F- w w 275 to kis AV N AV 23 „G, AV AV - - cn c z f— Q cn w LA JRIE RD r 125 Z B" (n •. Mt' 5 -')Ate! AVJ NORTH SA IN r PAUL LOCATION MAP W Q Q 12 4 Attachment I U94 Q N r JJ Lo 65 H/ TE BEAR LAKE D-8 ( 11) BRENWOCD CURVE cr Q ca G A L AV w a Wt ODLYNN AV E BRENNER AW d wC R tgtS7 W W 0 a J kE cr w F- w w 275 to kis AV N AV 23 „G, AV AV - - cn c z f— Q cn w LA JRIE RD r 125 Z B" (n •. Mt' 5 -')Ate! AVJ NORTH SA IN r PAUL LOCATION MAP W Q Q 12 4 Attachment I U94 Q N 57.67 574 4 Ij 4 4, 43! 143 5 4) 613 5. 173- t loa IZ&• 12 C), WC0L 33 33 A I ar— 5 6 7 H E 1, H D An 'n ro CD in rn cli T W ES tto 3 50 r .340GDO 030 Cor, I 8) O. L A L. 10 1 10 163.34 Ax 3 G o 3 0 Cj D 00) T LOT A 4 &;1 Ito, Ito, 77 Ito* 110' Ito* 160. 0) 4.0 1. U) 5 0 6 7 vi 8 0 0 B 0, r 12-) t 30) 34) '0 A 0 w 0 10WATERrn J# PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP Attachment 2 57.67 574 4 Ij 4 4, 43! 143 5 4) 7) WC0L N 4 5 6 7 H E 1, H WOO D LY IN HEI GHTS ^4 0 T W ES 8) O. L A L. A L . A 163.34 AxCjD 00) T LOT A 4 &;1 Ito, Ito, 77 Ito* 110' Ito* 160. 0) 4.0 1. U) 5 0 6 7 vi 8 0 0 0-* 0 z 23 12-) t 30) 34) '0 A 0 w 0 4.41 c 4-3b. " , . -a11co %n 0 It N 35) r-) C37) io -4-5. ,1 1 4 2-5' A. 4 P2$) co 9 16 17 6 19 n 0 (9 0 21 22 a C. C, A 0. 10 g5 - o r 1 0 4) 517: 38 80 6 4 • 10 r 3 • 1.21 ac . kn . 3 3 a. c. cl, r 97 ac, Z, (14% zoo 0 jg4q 3?1 21 .4 ... i-i 0.5r. 76 411.49 I 1 '0 14 00 20 4 210 ( 2 Z-) 0 0 02') D! C. rn 14 15 1 - N S 2 p) lkz 12 1:3 c 0 C- 81757' too* r- 0 --- ----7kl 3 3 C) 14.(o'l CDCC 1'? 0 2 At a 17 AL v III cl-'c 41 ZA23 voc- 3 8 (0 4i, 5.14 78 3 173 " Dew- jt) 70Z429 1-12-fal 2 2 SO r* 36 Doc 37 7 -70 -T rp03co94 . ld- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 13 105- 46) 0-5, 00. to T 30' 100 L; 100, 4 11 30 3 6 2 3 I> PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP Attachment 2 BOUNDARY SURVEY AND PROPOSED PLAT OF WOODLYNN HEIGHTS TOWNHOMES NO. 4 DESCRIBED AS: LOT 3. BLOCK 1. wOODLYNN HEIGHTS TOwNHOMES NO. 2 b1.b1 24.00 24.00 1 6 Attachment 3 o' cv f i O o z Iw 1 0 coe+ o C n o H c rs G 0- z o V i44; i O ~ O co34O1 ) 2 3 4 J < 0 4 O. . rr I r r- fr-r rte• Y • '7 1 I r PROPOSED T0'V NH0MES I16.0o atb.o Q f 143.34 O v O v 6 Attachment 3 Planning Commission -3- Minutes 9-18-89 C* L t 22 of Netnorlin Addition shall be re uired to be combined with Parcel #02-29- 22-il-0013 adjoining it on its east side so that they have. one parcel identification number.` 'Lots .18, 19 and 21/of Netnorlin Addition"-shall be required to.be combined with one parcel identification number. Lot 21 must be acquired bythe applicant. d* Payment of deferred; ,assessments on Lots 18-22 of $1,546.80, 2. In addition, prior to City. approval of a lot reconfiguration for,.;"Lots 18, 19 and 21, the applicant shall,re.donstruct the curb and gutter along the south side of Woodlynn Avenue so that it is continuous and 'shall regrade and seed the public boulevard. This shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 30 Change th address of 3048 Netnorlin Court to 2234 Woodlynn venue. e7/' Commissio.ne Sletten seconded Ayes--Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, ",\Cardinal, Fiola, Fischer, Sletten CO Preliminary and Final Plat: Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No, 4 Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report., Mr. Roberts said, after reviewing the tapes of the City Council meeting of December 8. 1986, that sidewalks would be required by the City Council along the north side of Woodlynn Avenue in conjunction with development of the townhomes. Mack Nettleton, the applicant, said if sidewalks are required for his previous development on Woodlynn Avenue, all developers should be required to provide sidewalks for their previous developments. Mr. Nettleton said he didn't think it was ethical or legal to require him to provide sidewalks for his previous developments A commissioner asked what the Planning Commission's past policy had been regarding these townhouses. Staff said the Planning Commission did not have conditions on the previous Woodlynn Heights townhomes requiring Planning Commission -4- Minutes 9 -18 -89 sidewalks,, The sidewalk requirement issue was initiated by the City Council, Commissioner Ayers moved the Plannin g Commission recommend: A. Approval of the Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 4 preliminary plat subject to the following conditions being satisfied before final plat approval: 1. Resolution of the grading and drainage concerns on the property in question to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2 A developer's agreement and cash escrow in a form and amount satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided to the City before final p lat approval for the installationn o t a 5 -foot -wide concrete sidewalk along Woodlynn Heights Townhomes No. 4 preliminary plat. f B. Table the approval of the final plat until all of the conditions contained herein for the preliminary plat are met. Commissioner Fiola seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Ayers, Barrett, Fiola, Fischer, Sletten Nays --- Cardinal D. Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit: 1244 Kohlman Avenue `,,Durand) Secretary 01,son presented the staff. -- report for this requested rezoning and conditional use permit to allow the rezoned parcel to be used br tree storage. A commissioner aske, what would prevent other kinds of storage on this pr perty in /the future Staff said a conditional use perm It is- /required which would limit th use of the property, Lawrence Durand said /hp had polled the adjoining property owners a d /they we e in agreement with this requested rezoning and conditional use permit. Mr. Durand said alb. access onto this,, property will be by his existing./landscape business property. Mr. Durand said the pr "operty had been zoned M -1 until approximately 1985. TO FROM: SUBJECT: DATE City Manager Director of Community Development Code Amendment -- Environmental Protection Ordinance October 11, .1989 INTRODUCTION The City Council directed staff to revise the environmental protection ordinance to provide more protection for significant trees. Council also wanted a survey of other cities' tree preservation ordinances. DISCUSSION The proposed ordinance gives the City more authority to preserve significant natural features, especially Large trees and woodlots. The following is ,a summary of major changes: 149 Section 9 -187: The ordinance would apply to-anyone alteringg a s igni. f scant .natural feature The current ordinance only applies to developments subject to . Councilor Community Design Review Board approval. 2 Section 9 -188 (definitions): Several definitions of significant types of natural features have been added. The size of significant or large trees is increased from 4 to 8 inches in diameter. 310 Section 9 -189: The density guarantee would be revised to allow the City to reduce the maximum allowed densit in they land use plan by 330 or increase the minimum lot area to 15., 000 square feet to preserve a significant natural feature. The current ordinance does not allow the City to protect some significant natural :features, particularly clusters of large trees, where their preservation would result in the loss of a developer's density. Most of the controversy surrounding the environmental Protection ordinance has centered around lot sizes and densities The following are a sample of average lot sizes for several plats in the "leg" Beth Heights 22,942 Huntington Hills South 25,636 Maplewood Highlands 19,446 Maidment Terrace 14,282 Highwood 1st -phase 15,560 Highwood 2nd phase 17,424 Gonyea's 1st and 2nd phases 16,840 Pleasantview Park 19,781 4. Section 9 -190: A tree plan is required showing which large trees and woodlots will be preserved. The City may hire a tree expert, at the developer's expense, to evaluate this plan if needed. 50 section 9- -191.. would require a woodlot alteration P ermit to alter a woodlot. Currently, removal of a woodlot is legal and requires no permit, 60 Section 9 -193 (5) : . New standards for tree cuttin g and replacement have been added, as well as a fencing and signage requirement during construction In addition to the proposed ordinance a tree reservation survey. eyis. included on page 10, the Eden Prair.i.e tree replacement policyy on page 11 and an article from "Zoning News , on suburban tree. ordinances on page.17. Staff is also handing ut the attachmentchment on page 19 from "Lasting Woodlands" with each buildin g permit involving tree removal. Several meetings were held with developers last springppg on a preliminary draft of this ordinance. A meeting as heldg on October 9 with • h a representative of the Builders Association of Minnesota and two local developers, Their changesp have been included.. Copies of this report will be sent to them precedingthemeeting. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached ordinance and resolution.establishin g an application fee of $50 for a woodlot alteration P ermit . kd\envir.ord Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2 Tree Preservation Survey 30 Eden Prairie Tree Replacement Policy 4, Zoning News 50 Lasting Woodlands" handout 6o Newspaper Article 70 Letter: Calvin Pipal 80 Resolution - Application Fee 90 Planning Commission Minutes 2 ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS the following o..revisions to Chapter 9, Article IX of the City code*-- Environmental Prot.ecti.on.ordinance (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out): Section 1.. Sections 9-187 through 9-193 (1) are amended as follows: Section 9-187., Applicability. This article shall apply to any person or use that would alter a si cant natural feature. enifl ;J P „1,r7;14 i i Q A* hii-i-Irlincs to he annnwre the% A nn z t use nn not to eXGeecd t,.Ao,xn t: I i re- A r r, wh on 13 rgzn =ha(aGuGhes t t A 10= 'Fit i n n Public and semi- ublic ro`ects such as streets,_L utilities and asks whether built by a Public agency or Private developer,- shall be sublect to this article; exc that the City Council ma v waive these requirements where there would.be a.---qneater ublic need for the Proi ect than to meet the requirements of this article. A public hearing shall be held be-fore declaring such a waiver. The PropertVL owners within 350 feet of the site shall be notified at least 10 days before the hearing.. Section 9-188. Definitions, Bluffline. A line delineating a top of a slope with direct drainage to a protected water, connecting the points at1 which the slope becomes less than eighteen (18) percent, More than one bluffline may be encountered proceeding landward from .a protected water.} Critical area: The Mississippi River Corridor Area bounded by Carver Avenue, 1-494 and the city limits, yn Gover; .4. A h t unt the vert.442;,;44 proiec-,tion --% G f t h 49 h~ r a n Gh nd f- n I j area of Wnr- a- ea usu esse-d as Direct drainage: Drainage into a protected water without an intervening pond or wetland, DripLline: The farthest distance aroundound and awa from the trunk of a tree that rain or dew will fall directly to the 3 Attachment I round from the leaves or branches of that tree. Erosion: The general process by which soils are removed by flowing surface or subsurface water or wind. Gross soil loss The average annual total amount of soil material carried from one acre of land by erosion.. Large tree: Any health . tree that has a trunk diameter four feet above the round of at least 8 inches, other than a box elder cottonwood o lar or anv other undesirable tree as determined -b the Director of Community Development. Pipeline: An underground line of pipe includ6 associatedg pumps, valves, control devices and other structures utilized for conveying liquids gases, sewage or other finely divided solids from one point.to another. Protected water Formerly referred to as public waters, means any water defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, Subdivi.sion 14. Retaining wall: A structure utilized to hold a slope in a position which it would not.naturally remain in. Sediment: Suspended matter carried by water , sewagee or other liquids. Significant natural feature: a sicrnificant water bod large tree a woodlot a significant slojoe, or a site of historical or archeological significance that has been recorded with the State. Si.iCfnificant slope:- A natural slope of 25 ercent or more rode over an area at least 200 feet in len th (to to bottom) and 500 feet in width (side to side. Significant water body: A water bodv shown on the Cit Y Drainage Plan or a water bo.dy over one acre in area. Slope:. The inclination of the natural surface of the land from the horizontal; commonly described as a ratio of the length.to the height. Stricture Anything manufactured, constructed or erected which.is normally attached to or positioned on land including portable structures. Substation:. Any utility structure, other than lines pipelines, poles he -l.es or towers. Terrace: A relatively level area bordered on one or more sides by a retaining wall. 4 at least one Cl 3-F GUr es or areater oursedian14 Utility.: Electric, telephone, telegraph,.cable television, water, sanitary and storm sewer, solid waste, gas or similar service operations, Vegetation: All plant growth, especially trees, shrubs, mosses or grasses. Water body: Any lake stream pond, wetland or river. Wetland: Any land which is seasonably wet or flooded, including all marshes, bogs, swamps or floodplains. Wood.lot: A treed area of at least one -half acre of which at least 2 5 0 of the area includes larcte trees,, Sec. 9- 1.89. Dt ffect on densit rrahar, The city may reduce the maximum allowed densit on that art only of. the development that has a signi ficant natural feature where such reduction would save all or part of a si nificant natural feature. However, rectardless of the requirements in this article the maximum allowed dens,.i,tv shall not be reduced below 67% of the allowed density in the city's land use plan for multiple dwellings. The minimum lot size shall not be increased above 15 ,000_-.-square feet for sin le dwellings, Any required densitv reduction or increase in lot size must save a significant natural the feature. The Cit y Council ma y requireuire clustering of dwellings In the form of town- houses, quads, e apartments or similar uses, where it is necessary to preserve s,ignificantL natural features . 5z ; nC%1 P f ;4m tt-- Ation as part nf- an DIVISION 2 SITE PLANNING REQ,"TTI -IRE M N ADMINISTRATION RiSection9 -190. Treet -e plan required. A tree plan shall be required with any Citv application which would result in the loss of lar e trees or all or art of a woodlot. This _.plan shall show the existing woodlot identify-the sizes and species of anv larcfe trees and indicate which trees are to be removed. The applicant shall show on the tree—plan and on the site the limits of P-roposed......cfrading----activity near a large tree or woodlot to be preserved. These grading-limits shall not encroach upon the drip-lines of the trees to be----preserved in the woodlot. Cit staff may submit the plan to a tree expert for a 5 recommendation, An costs shall be aid for bv the developer, Sec. 9 -191. Woodlot alteration permit. a A woodlot.alteration'...app,lication shall be submitted to the Director 'of Communitv Development. for any alteration of a woodlot that is not reviewed in another a lication. The applicant shall submit a tree - plan and any other information needed to determine compliance with this article, Specific requirements shall be stated on an application form in the office of the Director of Community Development An application fee shall be established by the Cit Council by resolution from time -to -time fb), T he Director of Communit Develo ment ma a rove a woolot alteration permit which complies with this article. The Director's decision,.may be amDealed to the City Council . in writing by an effected party within ten days of the 0 rector's written decision. Sec, 9 -192 Conditions of Approval. The City may require conditions of -a royal to insure compliance with this article. DIVISION 3. APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 9 --1- -1 1930 Approval =i±:= I standards . Any re-quest to alter a significant natural feature must meet the following standards: Az tho 1} General standards, a. All plans and the The conduct of all grading., landscaping, structure placement, and street routing shall be consistent with And to the maximumm dam+ -or+- ; rZjbd6 a fir#- r nr•o f the City's comprehensive plan, and. a s v i 1 i 4it for development in the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area, the Maplewood Critical Area Plan, b. The proposed development shall not lessen existing public access to and along a protected water. Ce C. The proposed development shall be designed, constructed and maintained to avoid causing: 1 AGGGI erated Erosion. 2. Pollution, contamination or siltation of water bodies or storm sewers. 3. Flooding. 4. Ground water contamination. 50 Alteration of significant natural features . d Development shall not substantially diminish the scientific, historical educational, recreational or aesthetic value of unique natural areas, plants and animals, which are registered with the state as such, and shall.not substantially alter the their reproductive cycles hgz GnPC_ es el, Views of protected waters from buildings or p ublic streets shall not be impaired bythe placement of advertising signs. Section 20 The current Subsection 191 (5), now 193 (5), is amended as follows: 5) Trees. a. Development shall be designed to preserve 1arfe trees and woodl.ots where such--preservation would not effect the public health, safety or welfare. -h- The City may rohibt removal of all or Dart of a woodlot or large tree subject to the limitations in Section.36- 189. In addition nothin in this article shall prevent building.on an existing lot of record Provi ded that such buildin shall be desi ned to save as many. trees as possible, This decision shall be based on, but not limited to the following criteria: 1. Size 20 Species, health and attractiveness of the trees, including: a) sensitivity to disease, fib) life span. c) nuisance characteristics d) sensitivity to site grading. 3. Potential for transplanting. 4. Need for thinning a woodlot. 5. Effect on the functioninq of a development. 7 60 The Public health safety and welfare. thAt over nnreved h z r - tzh e G i t t r..r. b. If lame trees are cut, the density of trees shall . be restored to that which existed before development, but in no case shall the applicant be required to.raise the density above ten (10) trees per acre, unless part of a required planting screen. _- +. A- -- o c re.a 36. -. shall he varied in at l c t t 1.rr1 1 c.b If any large tree in a woodlot is cut, damaged or the area within the tree's dri line has been encroached u on b radn e ui ment without Cit authorization the City mav require Dlanting of two new treesO In addition if the Citv determines that a damaged tree will Probably not survive it shall be removed b the developer. Anv trees recfuired to be--planted shall be varied in Species, shall maximize the use of species native to the area shall not include any siDecies under disease epidemic and shall be ha,rdv under local conditions. Trees shall be at least 2 1f2 inches in diameter for deciduous trees and.,,.eicfht feet tall for coniferous trees. e.d-.- An trees required to be-planted shall be re laced if..thev die or appear to be d in within one vear of Dlanting bv the erson responsible for the Plantincf f. Before-anv construction or,,---cfrading takes place, s.nowfencing or erosion control fencincf shall be laced around the borders of woodlots or the dri lines of large trees to be preserved. Signs shall be placed alone this fence line prohibiting grading beyond the fence line. A TREE PRESERVATION SURVEY St of f Surveyed b suburban cities Circle Pines was al so i nc l Uded at the . City CO nc i i ' s regUest . Each city was as[ .-: ed for-their tree% p reservat i can req u i r.emen t s . only two cities , Burnsville and Eden Prairie , have city --wide .tree preservation ordinances. Tf-ie f cal 1 caw J. fey c i t i eE7; hz.Ave no tree preserv t i on. ordinances Coon F a? a d : , ' 1 ym.outh , Brooklyn Center , Fr i d 1 ey , Blaine , Crystal y New Brighton, New Hope , App 1 e Val 1 ey, , South St . F'aUl , Map l e Grove, Col Um.b 18 H i. ghts , West St. Paul , Shoreview, North- St. Paul , c1a kdal e., Woodbury , Newport , Little Canada, and Circle Fines The f of 1 ow i. nq cities have a limited tree preservation ord i nonce n Roseville requires a condi`tio`nal Use permit to cut . trees with at last- a 6-inch. diameter in shore% and areas. Cottage Grove has a similar ordinance to Maplewood, but it only applies to designated critical area 1 and al onq the Mi sis ippi River T h e f 01 !owing cities have a city --wide tree preservation ordinance: Bur^nsvi l l e has a similar ordinance to Maplewood, except that any tree with a diameter of at least 2-1/2 inches that is cut must be replaced , UP t o a maX i MUM of 15 trees per acre. Vadne i s He i. ght . requires tree preservation, butt has no specific r,egU i rement s or required replanting. Eden Prairie has the most detailed tree replacement policy of any of the c: i t. i. ec-S surveyed. A copy is attached . It appears to be d if icul t and t. ime-conSU.ming to admin inter because of its c omp l e i t y. VJh ite Bear Lake is considering an ordinance to regulate cutt ing trees b inches or more in diameter. 10 Attachment 2 w TREE REPLACEMENTEMENT POLICY P As PURPOSE It i s the intent and desire of the City to protect, P reserve and enhance the natural environment and beauty of Eden Prairie by encouragin 9 the resourceful and prudent development of our existing woodland areas. To create an incentive. for good planning, design, and development, the Tree Replacementacement P P ' P Policy shall serve as a basis for project review in the promotion of tree preservation and /or determining the required replacement of significant. trees. When reviewin g new development projects, either commercial or residential, City Staff attempts through design to preserve and protect natural site ch aracteri st ics ..such as wooded. areas, hills, and ponds' However, it is nott always P ossible and/or f easi b le to save 100% of any exi sting significant natural site characteristic. Because of this, a tree replacement of is has been developed, P P y B . BACKGROUND In developing the Tree Replacement Policy, Staff had to determiney ine the following items 1. Define significant tree. A significant tree is defined as a tree of 12. inches in diameter or greater whose mature height will be greater than 30 feet lesexamCP oak, maple, basswood, etc.) or a tree of 8 inches in diameter or more whose mature • height is usually less than 30 feet (example s ironwood, cedar /juniper, etc.). 20 Which species of trees shall be replaced? Deciduous hardwood trees which shall be replacedaced i n udpincludes oak, maple, basswood, ash, ironwood,, etc.. In addition, coniferous trees shall also be replaced if they meet the specific size requirement. Diseased trees shall not be subject to tree replacement. It 'I's the re spon s i bl i ty of the developer to submit a certified tree inventorydepicting: a. The size, species, and condition of all trees reatg e r than12inchesindiameterwhosematureheightwillbereater than 30 feet (examples: 9 oak, maple, basswood, ash, Colorado Spruce, etc.). b. The size, species, and condition of all trees ratege er than 8 inches in diameter whose mature height is usually less than 30 feet (examples: ironwood, cedar /juniper, etc.). 11 Attachment 3 B ased on th i s tree inventory, the actual tree loss will be calculated and the amount of rep l aceme nt .determined . To reduce the amount of tree replacement req u i red , the proponent may opt to relocate those trees which are suitable. It wi 11 be the. responsi.bi,l ity of the City Forester to make the final determination. as to the . number and types of trees which shall be replaced and /or relocated. 3. At what point (percentage) is a si ni fi cant woodgwooded area substantially altered by tree removal . For a wooded site, short of acquisition by the Cit y, some tree removal is probably unavoidable and reasonable to expect as ' a part of development of the land. By only replacing significant trees, a substantial amount of vegetation under this size could be removed without replacement. This fact alone allows considerable latitude in the reasonable development of property. Generally, the smaller the percentage of the overall wooded p orton of the site that is removed, the less the change in the character of. this site; a nd therefore, the less the percentage of replacement necessary to preserve the character of the site. The larger the percentage of removal of trees of the total wooded area the greater the change in the character of the site and the larger the percentage of tree replacement required to help mitigate the change9insitecharacter. Staff, therefore, suggests that for any removal of the significant trees on a site, a proportion of the trees shall be replaced on a diameter (caliper) inch for diameter inch basis. CO TREE REPLACEMENT The first 100 caliper inches of tree removal from a site shall b e replaced 100% with the remaining caliper inches replaced on a ro ort ionate basi . fpPs The proportion of tree replacement shall diminish from 100% replacement at 60% loss down at a c.on sta nt rate to the 100 caliper inch mark. Trees removed outside of an approved construction plan would continue to be rep 1 aced at 100% on an area inch per area inch basis. 1. Tree Replacement Calculations The amount of tree replacement i s based upon the total amountpot of caliper inches of significant. trees removed from the site divided bythetotalamountofcaliperinchesofsignificanttreeson -site. General provisions of this policy include; a. The first 100 caliper inches removed from an site hys .all be replaced 100 percent. b. If the percent of caliper inches removed is greater than or equal to 60 percent, the caliper inch rep l acement shall be100percent. 12 t 20 Tree Replacement Formu 1 a Total. Caliper Inches Rem.ovPd = Percent Caliper' Inches Removed Total Cal iper Inches Percent Caliper Inches Removed x Tree Replacement Factor 1 *66) Percent Tree Replacement Total Caliper Inches Removed 100 Total Cal iper Inches Replaced by Percentage Total Caliper Inches Replaced by Percentage x Percent Tree Replacement) + 100 = Total Caliper Inch Replacement Examples a. .95 Caliper Inches Removed 400 Total Caliper Inches 95 400 = 23.75% Regardless of percentage, because the total amount of tree removal is less than or equal to 100, tree. replacement shall be 100% or 95. caliper inches. b. 367 Caliper Inches Removed 743 Total Caliper Inches 367 49,39 49.39% x 1.6 6 = 81.98' 367 - 100 = 267 267 x 81.980 + 100 318.88 or 319 Caliper Inches Replacedp C. 811 Caliper In ce s Removed 923 Total Caliper Inches 811 9 = 87.86% Because the percentage of trees removed i s 9 reater than or equal to 60% the amount of tree replacement shall be 100% or 811 caliper inches. 3 . Replacement Locations Once the amount of tree replacement has been determined the proponent will be required to submitt o landscape plan detailing the location, type, and size of trees to be replaced. This plan will be required prior to first reading by the City Council. 13 Locations in which tree replacement shall occur are as follows: a. Site restoration areas including steep es. slo P b Lot yard areas. C . out lots or common areas. d• Buffering between different land. use and/or activ * t ' yes. e. Entrance monuments. f • Adjacent park or. community spaceYenPPe ( be coordinated by the Planning Staff and the Community Services Staff). 40 Sizes and Types The minimum size of tre.es which shall be ' givenven cred t for tree replacement are a 3" deciduous tree or an 8' coniferous tree, excepttthatinsteepsloerestoration, P P i on, using 2 1/ 2 size trees, credit will be given. No replacement credit will be given forg shrubs._.. or ornamental trees. The attached list describes the types of trees suitable to be planted in Eden Prairie. Tree designatedTreesesgnated ..for replacement shall be of a similar variety of the trees which were removed when applicable and /or available. ENFORCEMENT In Multi - family, Office, Commercial or Industrial development s, thedeveloperwillberequiredtofollownormallandscape Eden bonding procedures' ures asintheCityofPrairie 's Land scape /Screening Procedures andRequirements. • In. Single Family Residential subdivisions the procedure shall be asfollows: 1. To determine the cost of the trees to be replaced, the developer should either provide the City with a contract for the replacement of the trees or two nursery estimates. If a developer fails to give nursery estimates or provide the City with a copy of an actual contract for installation of the trees, then the City will estimatebasedonitsknowledgeofthe y q e approximate price per caliper inch todeterminethetotalcost. 2. Proponent will be requiredired to submit • q surety at 1 1/ 2 Mmes the .costofthetreereplacementSuretyshalleitherbeabondl credit cash or. a ett er of n assurance of an escrow with a title company, 3• The City will provide one landscapepe inspect ion each year (usually inthefall) for each individual -project.. At that time the amlandscapingnstalledwill amount of 9 1 be determined. one complete growingseasonafterthe1stinspectionabsubsequentbond .amount willl1 bereleasedifincompliancewiththedeveloper's agreement and ' Code. The balance of P g CitythesuretywillberetainedbytheCityasaguaranteefortreereplacementand /or completion. 14 r Should any of the landscaping material not be. installed, the City will retain the associated bond. amount which shall be placed into a Natural Resources Fund. The purpose of the Natural Resources Fund shall include but- not 1 imited to the purchase of landscaping to be placed within the adjacent neighborhood or c orrmu n i ty park. In addition to the number of. trees being removed as part of construction the proponent w i l l also be liable for the replacement of those' trees directly at or near the construction limits which may .die as a direct result of this construction activity. In order to protect the City and future homeowner against additional tree loss, the proponent will be required to. bond. for those trees which have been designated: as being saved but due to their proximity to any construction activity, may not survive. The number of caliper inches of "questionable ". trees shal 1 be calculated and a subsequent bond amount included,-as part of the tree rep i.acement bond At the time of final inspection for the replacement trees, these "questionable" trees wii l also be inspected. After this inspection, the proponent will be contacted regarding any additional tree replacement and /or tuning for the bond release. 15 a SHADE TREES - la.r e trees 30+ feet mat ruehei ht Norway Maple - Acer platanoides cut tiears 'Cleveland' Red Maple - Acer rubrum cul t i vars - Northwood' Fi redance' Silver Queen Silver Maple (seedless) - Acer saccharinum Silver Queen Sugar Maple - Acer saccharum cut itvar - 'Green Mountain' River Birch - Betul a ni gra Hac kberry - Cel t i s occi dents 1 i s Black Ash - Fraximus ni 9 ra Green Ash - Fraxinus Penns y lvanica cu l ti vars - "Newport ` , 'Bergeson 'Marshall's Seedless eess Pa tmo re , IS umm i t Ginkgo Ginkgo bi 1 oba (male only) Honeylocust - Glenditsia tricanthos ' i nerm s Kentucky Coffeetree - Gymnocladus dioic us Ironwood Ostrya virginiara White Oak - Quercus a 1 ba Swamp White Oak - Quercus bicolor. Pin Oak Quereus pal ustri s Northern Red Oak - Quercus rubra American Linden - Ti l i a ameri Gana Li ttl el ea f Linden Ti 1 i a Gorda t a cul ti vars Gl enl even' , Greenspi re Redmond Linden - Ti 1 i a ameri can 'Redmond' a Conifer Trees Balsam Fir - Abi es bal samea White Fir Abi es concol or European Larch - La r i x dec i d ua Black Hills Spruce Pi cea l auca ' De9 nsata Austrian Pine - Pi nus ni gra Ponderosa Pine - Pi nus ponderosa Norway Pine Pi nus res i nosa Scotch Pine - Pi nus syl vestri s White Pine - Pinus strobus Douglas Fir - Pseudotsu a menzi es i i Canadian g Hemlock -- Tsuga canadensi s 16 p ,s; • *. JANUARY 1989 Ne .i } rj = 1 t: •irA 3u , i ,:q,. b , .,t,!" t'•`Ai ! '4 *sy, t : 4 +ti4 ° a:k., . t • % g`p+j !!• +" !f4t R < "S v++ta ',1,, ,F` ,1- ,, 1+'"y. `l » rv, . t,t. • « t_ , Yt' 1!M ~ •ii ". Ih' i &' «`MSjt .n s`,K' .,tom 1 z. L4 x o- .y. e.. 1 f u.,- tf y !'v, d . ,;:' ',. ;1`,. •:w Ntiu•, ++,z; ;. . ,r '!'; y, ."q. ,a•J'a 7 M `n4 i . y'? yI ^a: ;::, y' +Y ,. ' 1. r a..r.. .1; f.. " `.K '., `.. a i ` t i?`% 4 • « '" , j T11< ;a`F/h s r';!' R} -p"/ hn .,! a:j ° . 4 -; a.:: PLANNING a`.b``if .ZP`y% • y j. " f ii» ' +` "t :tai yr +1.r. - t ":' !t••. _,.' ,e:y >.••'&,; ';r: *i :a,.. ". 4 a'.,r5, ,y3;; J i F.f 1` `t, r ^4- :t .. :i :.. «`.y.. 4'• v ": .Yd- F. .. r+.;.fi r L ..:'i•' +ia jam. ,. -lt w:: <ii .y. tti"y.;-4;.,,f+11;.3N:'r°;1*_ ri4ii.!?A`'. A;:` E'y'. ' ;.,`q_ >t:, .";:':, ,.'vat:it v'I•t f i„',.. '"*'yj'.,.. • • . . g.+ ti 1136. A Tree G1*0NVS I11 Suburbia In Pinellas County, 1--'lorida., before the county adopted a tree preset vatic_)n cuclC b1lildCl tiwoulcl market riew homes by showing off a mode with extensive landscaping and large trecs..1 -titer, after all tilt; 11011le sites were sold off, builders Would clear the rcmainklg tracts, put up homes arid tell stunilCd lio.illcbuyers that landscaping was their responsibility. Such clear - cutting practiccs are not unique to Florida. A recent study by 'free Atlanta, a conservation group, shows that the oletrc pol itan area lases the e(luivalcnt of up to 50 acres of WoOdkil)(Is PC[- &1y during tilt prime building season. Arid the U.S. 0cparnilerat e3f Agric: dturc: Cstim.atc:s du.tt many ()f the Washington, D.C. suburbs have lost up to half of their woodlands over the last 30 years. (See graph.) The CorltlnuCCl loss of woodlands has forced many cities to adopt ordinances to protect trees from indiscriminate clearing for land development. A large nunlb-er of tree protection ordinances were enacted during the 1970s. However, many of these codes did not work out. Many cities did not have adequate Staff to police the protection of trees. They required developers to identify large trees oil site plans but were unable to determine whether trees were actually saved. Some cities Ise) (mind that graclilil, activitic"s and titility excavations later killed those trees that were supposed to be saved. Many cities also discovered that it was politically infeasible to adopt strong ordinances that might stop developrllcnt or require modifications of plans in order to protect trees. Hie second generation of tree protection ordinances sill-1plifies the process of tree preservation and goes further than the I 970 codes. The cities featured below all have good tree preservation programs. They all conduct inspections, many have staff or consulting arborists, and all have experience in the administration of tree protection codes. Lake Forest, Illirlois his affluent suburb oil Chicago's North Shore has taken tree Preservation seriously for a long tir-ne. For the last nine years, it lilts been do signated a ""free City" by the National Arbor Day Foundation. In 1987, the city's tree protection program gained national attention following a fight between Mr. T, the television actor, and the city council. Irumcdiately after moving to Lake Forest, Mr: T chopped down over .100 oak trees on his estate, reportedly to relieve allergies. The city COLHICII COndCillilCd file '101011 as 44outragCOtIS destruction." At file tittle, Like I=orest's tree preservation code applied only to new clevelopincilts ancl, thei-c:fure, (11d not apply to Mr. T's prOPer•ty. I'lle city's code now prohibits the mass rci-noval of trees from all 11Cw building Site!) controls the removal of existing trees from front yards within 35 feet of the road right - of -way. Tile controls on clearing of construction sites apply to all of the city's buildable lots arid to the protection of all trees at least 12 inches in diarlleter at breast height. Trees may be removed in a "construction area" that includes the building envelope, driveways, and utility lines. Builders Must stake out a building envelope plus 20 feet, acces.sways, and areas for utility trenches. All large trees outside of this area must be preserved. To protect existing trees, the city's cock establishes a preservation area" extending 35 feet in depth along any lot line facing a public street. Permits are required for the removal of any trees 12 inches in diameter or larger within this area. Permits may be granted if the tree is diseased, dead, or dying, or if tree preservation would create ,in economic hardship on the property owner. Even if Such permits are granted, the owner may be required, at the disc: rehon of the dircciOr t}f parks, fmcstry, and public: wm-ks, it) replace 1110se: trees removed with others no less than four inches in cliarlleter. Flllt011 County, Georgia The county board of commissioners adopted a tree preservation ordinance in 1985. The code applies to all new development except for single - family home construction. According to Edward Macie, Fulton County Arborist, the ordirlarice has been highly effective in protecting thousands of existing trees arid requiring the planting of tens of thousands of new trees. Ac:c:oiding to Macie, flexibility has been the key ingi- client to the county's protection program. As code administrator,. he Acres of Trees iri Selected Areas of Subrrrl);m Washington Anne Prince Arundel George~ x County County County 209 150 50 Q Psi kn Ic 000 CN CN Sc}u:cc. U.S Forest Semite 17 CO ON ` C1% ON Attachment 4 Q kn T / V' V \ a\ S.-t.r v4 i1i has bmi given discretion in negotiatiri€; which trees must be protected ;Intl which irl;ly bc: t-c111mcd. 1*11e Code doles licit I C(IL ire 111;11 ;Ill trots lac I)rctiCIA,C 1, but, when tree~ are reillovcci, they rllust he replaced. Tile tree protection criterila apply to any land- clearing, grading, or construction activities. Tree protection and IZI,ndscapc plans I11uSt be submitted with other construction plans and rllust :sllmv \vhic'h trees will be prescrvcd. mcthods OfgLlalfdillj; trCCS JUTArll; tre)I SSMC (Mil, pruposcd utility trenches) acid areas to be graded or landscaped. Tlhe protection of" trees clues not end with tale submission of plans in l'ulton.County.. Construction activities must be altered to lir»it the arlloullt of grading or clearing within the vicinity of protected trees. TlICSc trccs must be fenced off tea 1~cep heavy equipment from inadvertently danmgkig a tree's root system. The protected arca includes all the area tmicath the tree's Canopy drip lille. The drip line: is a vertical line extending from the outer surface of a trc;e's branch tips clown to the ground. Hilton Head Island, SOLIth Cal-olilla Milton Ifcad's ordinance is gcared not only to preserving trees but also to maintaining the diversity of tree Specie~ on the island. Developers arc I-equircd to do a complete count of all trees on a site and d.QCU1Ile1lt tilleir size and species. The results of the count a-re used to calculate the number of trees that must be preserved, based oil a mini.nlurll standard of 900 adjusted caliper inches oftrees per acre of pervious surface area. The ordinance also establish.cs tile mix of species that must be retained oil the site:. ,I Ile island's goal is to rllatrltatrl (he approximate composition of tree species that existed on the undisturbed site. For example, a developer cannot destroy a stand of oak trees unless there are enough remaining hard`vocicls tea Provide: tilt; appropriate balance of hardwood trees to the rather types of trees on the site:. The town's code also addresses the problem of lots that were cleared of trees years ago but never developed. Developers of these sites are required to plant trees to meet a minimum Ilulllber of tree caliper inclies per acre. Finally, (lie ordin.lnce requires individual hoincowncrs to Maintain the trees on thcir lot. Sally Krebs, (lie town's natural resource coordinator, spends two days a -wcck doing inspections of sites. "If a tree dies or is hit by a car, it's got to be replaced — period." Agoura Hills, California In response to the removal of vast numbers ofoak trees in Los Angeles County,'the city of Agoura Hills passed strict oak preservation guidelines that prevent even (he pruning of oak tree limbs larger than two inches in diameter without an oak tree permit. The ordinance also requires a permit for the removal of any oak tree. Susan Kelsey, Agoura Hills' oak tree consultant, notes that the planning coinmission will approve rcmoval only when reasonable use of the site %yould be completely inhibited by prescrvation of the trees. f=our new oaks mwl t be plarltccf fm c;tc h o;11•: that is rcllloved. During construction, all oak trees rllust be surrounded by a five- foot -high chain link fence placed at least 15 fect beyond the trunk. If a proposed building or sidewalk encroaches into this prolec:tlon imlIC, the: CitJ11"S (Mk trcc: COIISultant I11ust be on the site at all (Imes that work in the protected zone is being dolic. III S01110 C ;ISC'S, huildln s linve 11;id to 1i' rC'ticsi ziie l tliirinQ construction ill order to save oaks. Kelsey points out that -over the last 100 years, there's been incredible, intentional devastation of the oaks. Now, we've recognized the importailce of saving our n;l(liral resources." Wctit Blc milfleld 'I'(m liship :lace Novi. rie•hig:Ir1 III MIC1119 ;III. C01111111111111CS ;lie lA ing ,Ic ps it) PI CIN 'r VC At M)"11 ;111d arc• ls. Wuxi 13immil ield Towntihil) :md Novi I ve• design;Itcd woodland areas oil of f icial wo.c dkmd malm Dc\-elopmcnt that tales place in these areas must comply X11111 the woodlands protection ordinarlCC. III ` CS1 B100111field, the extent tee which devc:1opillcilt n1;IN. Clicrm ch lilto the woc diand ;irt` ;i depends can (lie Ccclloplic ; 11 scnsili\ itv cif the aica. For C.Ich pw poscd dcvc•Ic)1Ii1i(-111, (lic• OWI1S1111) s wuOdiand revie", bt);Ifd LICICrrlliriCS a -tolerance paint--- --illc number of trees that can be rcinovcd witliout dcstroVing the woodland character of tilt site. In areas that have exccliclit soils kand are l oplil;lted bN' f;ISt- growing s.l)ecics of trees. the: begird rn;1y I)CI-11111 tile re-11lM-411 .0f up to 50 percent of the trees can (lie site. I lowevcr, ill dCHC'.11c.• ecological areas, the board may restrict this removal to' mily !t) percent of the total number of ti s. Novi's ordinancc protects woodland areas 1)), rc•clucing re:quircd Im sizes and allowing cluster devc1oprllclit when the majority of tilt property is within a bona fide woodland 'Ire'll. For example.. in the town's residential estate district, tilt• reeluircki lot sizes can be reduced [1,0111 Mie ;tCI-C (o erne•- thiltl acre where wooded areas will he preservc•d. Beath the West Bloom field and Novi ordin'llices 1111P lsc' monetary penalties on property owners found to have viols w' d the woodland protection regulations. West B100111f iced 'llscl rc(luires that devc1opers post a bond equal to 60 per tfCC e}I) lie: site as a condition of site plan ;ippro val. If the dcvcl()l)c:r destroys trees in excess of the number allmvcd, the: bmid money-is devoted to supplemental landscaping of the ;site. 1-0111 Bird. planning director for West Bloonlf field, says that this step is tak -crl as a last resort. "'The best enforcement mechanism is to Illarntarn a vigilance on the propcc ty throughout the devc1oprllent process.'* Ill recent }cars, CUr11r11unrtrCS have: dC\'CI I)Cd SOphisOC I(Cd approaches to protecting trees from both the bulldozer and [lie overly exuberant residential tree pruner. Remit codc.•s dcnion.watc i1111e7vat 011 ;Ind flcxiblity in kend (10TIO11HICIII regal ;preens in the intc•rc:st cif pi- c•scrving trees. The tree clydI Ili lice ill Bellevue. Washington, pc . ill its 111) tc1 ;r 10 pClLe•11t reduction in the number of required parking Spaces for the: retention of over 15 percent of tilt significant trees (m site. Ill Orlando, Florida,,thc city council may require a proposed ; subdivision to cluster homes in carder to protect Ole trcc•s can site. Finally. Pleasant gill, California, has found that public relation techniques, such as the awarding of tree preservaticlrl plaques, greatly enflance public support for tree protection. Lake Comity, III., Adol)ts PCI- Fol- 111nlice I()illllg List month, Lake County adopted ;I new perfcar111;Ilice Z0111n1-1 ordinance for the 200 square miles of unincorporated land ill tilt county. In a 20 to 3 vote. the county board cndorse(I the.• controversial ordinance that has been ovrr five years in the 111:1 , IIIg . The l?cr for niarice zoninr cO IICCpt was intloduced in 1.A-C C omit ' by L ;Inc• Kcn&Q. tilt• comm-'s f0i mer lir t'tt r ,t. 1'1.11111111:. The rllt lC! rJin.InCc• that ;Il l•,irs in 11c•nt i :)..'11 bvc)l;. Perfiormonc e. Zcyrir fr . was originally prepared for adoption in Lake Count\•. However. the taunt)' delayed approval of the new Toning cede because of tile ohiccilons cif a number of municipalities. ipalities. LNSTING WOODLNNUS PRESENTS.. A Dozen Very Basic Things 111,11ich Developers.. and Builders Should Know in Order to Avoid Killing Trees and to avoid the laivsuus that would result from such killings) 1. _:The roots are. the most important part of a tree. 2. Tree roots rnusr have oxygen(!) in order to function. Covering roots with dirt or water can deprive roots of vital oxygen supplies, especially roots of oak trees. 3. The key feeder roots of most trees (especially of oak trees) are in the top 6 -12 in. of soil. The myth of "deep rooted trees" is just that: .a myth. Even side roots from the short tap root" of an oak slant upward to get to oxygen and rain water. 4. The feeder roots of trees are mostly in a large, shallow disc,that is 2 -4 times the area covered by the crown. In other words, the roots usually extend far beyond the branches! 5. Grading dirt over the feeder roots of trees anywhere under their branches (and often beyond) suffocates the feeder roots and kills all or most of the crown in 1 -3 years. 6. Grading dirt away from the root zone of trees removes their feeder roots and does great injury to the crown within 1 -3 years. It kills the nearly invisible hair roots. 7. If you can see roots of a tree., which you have cut, you have already done considerable damage to the tree: it is like seeing a pulsing artery in a flesh cut on a human. 8. Compaction of soil under trees (especially by. bulldozers working an area, and by repeated parking of cars, pickups and trucks by construction people) is almost as deadly.to trees as coverinb their roots with soil. The compaction deprives the hair roots. of oxygen. 9. a protecting "tree well" (e.g. a stone wall) around the trunk of a tree while coverinb the surrounding area with dirt is a fool's project. It does no good at all. 10. Trenching to install utilities cuts a tree's roots. Multiple trenches can sever most of a tree's roots. Remember, it is the roots of a tree, not its top, which are most important. 11. Changing rides so that temporary or permanent ponding of water occurs usually results in suffocation. of all roots in the pond due to lack of oxygen, and the trees die. 12. Wounding ak trunks and branches an time from early spring to late summergy usuall y results in oak wilt infecting the tree in areas where oak wilt disease exists. The infection will usually spreadread through grafted root systems to the whole clump of oak trees surrounding b the infected tree. Bulldozers and "Bobcats" easily create wounds in oaks. Prepared by Donald C. Willeke, Attorney at Law, Willeke & Daniels, 201 Ridgewood Avenue, Minneapolis, MN. Mr. Willeke is Chairman of the Minnesota State Shade Tree Advisory Committee. fie is a Director of the American forestry Association and of Lasting Woodlands, Inc. Lasting Woodlands, Inc. is a non - profit corporation. Call Chris Siems, President, at 612 - 439 -3356. 19 Attachment 5 Construction Damage Prevention: On -Site Strategies On this page we lay out a series of steps that are essential to construction site tree preservation. These steps should become an .integral part of the building process. Unfortunately (fortunatety for us forest - lovers!), each woody is different and generates its own questions pertaining to individual tree tolerances. For example: Which tree blocks should be saved? How should traffic be directed on the site? These questions are best answered by a qualified, professional consultant. The help of a consultant often pays for. itself by saving a builder's valuable time and by increasing property values. Tree preservation can be viewed as a four step process. Each step should be integrated into every building project. 1. Develop a lot plan that pinpoints tree blocks to be preserved. The builder who says, "I'll try to save as many trees as I can" will inevitably seeY one tree after another damaged or destroyed due to "accidents" or "miscommunications. „ Know what you are trying to accomplish and which tree blocks you want to preserve before an ortion of the construction project begins. The expertise of a consultant isYP especially valuable during this phase. 2. Partition off designated areas with snow fencing, flagging, and signs. Block off the areas you wish to preserve with snow fencing and flagging. Post signs that state that there is to be no filling, scraping, or trenching of the soil , and noggP drivin g or parking in these designated areas. This may seem somewhat severe but it is the only sure way to let contractors and buyers know that you are serious about preserving those. trees. A side benefit of your efforts is the positive image it will project; it says that you -are taking every precaution to preserve trees. 3. Explicitly communicate instructions to every contractor on the site. Nearly ve builder we've spoken to voices one common problem: It's impossibley • every signals andtobeonthesiteeverysecond, and it only takes one contractor to nuss the g damage designated tree blocks. There are two ways to combat this problem. Conspicuous fencin g g naandsi a make acceptable traffic flow and on -site practices very clear to everyg contractor entering. the site. Second, if possible, tree preservation practices should be a written component in the contract with each contractor. Once again this seems somewhatP harsh but it goes a long way toward getting the desired results. 4. Monitor the health, and vigor of trees during and after construction. Even the most woodland- sensitive construction can place trees under some stress, and the effects of this stress sometimes aren't apparent immediately. Check the health of reserved trees eriodic"y to make sure they have maintained their vigor. wilting leaves isPP the first sign of construction damage. If this occurs, contact a tree -care expert immediately. Once again, this is a great way to make it clear to everyone that you are serious aboutg saving trees. It is also one step you can take to avoid construction damage liability. These steps may seem like the entail a lot of extra work, but when you integratePYY them. into your regular building process, they will become a routine part of each building project. That's what we're striving for: A network of builders for whom tree preservation comes as naturally as fran1ing or sheathing. ote: Eachfiurure issue o will contain an article-that more t roughly develops the steps and ideas expressed in this piece. If you have any questions about construction damage, please cal! Christian Siems at 439 -3356. We can link you up with professionals that can help you .That's what our network is for! 20 . ii c r+ c ra Construction Damage Liability,6--Straight Talk by Donald C. WiUeke, Attorney and Counselor at Law, and a Director of the American Forestry Association Developers and contractors face a potentially expensive problem if they disregard the damage which can occur when homes are built on wooded lots.. Often nonsuspecting homebuyers purchase a newly constructed home on a lot containing what appear to be large, healthy trees. Then, to their dismay, m' a year or two some of the trees start to show signs of distress: brunches die, and sometimes whole trees collapse in mid - season. The ) homeowners' first :impulse is to talk to their city forester or to call some tree care company. From such tree experts they get the bad news: "Four tree roots were buried with new fill, and the trees are goners. "' d d f th h 'firs t t the builderTheStanarreactionoescomeowncrsisttogeveryangrya who sold them the, home or did the construction, and then to go out, get a lawyer and sue. Liability of builders to homeowners for tr a loss is based upon several theories. 1) That the builder knew or should have known that damage would result to the trees from construction activities but acted. negligently. It is no defense that the builders did not in fact know. General Motors. was supposed to know that Corvairs could blow up. Building cars. is its business, and it is supposed to know how to do the job right. 2) That the builder knew of the dage or potential damage and did.not tell the nonsuspecdn ma g buyers. ` This is, to use the unpleasant legal term, simply "fraud." 3) That the builder breached the contract he or she had with the homeowners, either to build the home properly, or to, sell them an already constructed home with what appeared to be healthy trees on the property. 4) That the builder violated consumer protection laws in selling the homeowners a defective product, or "hoodwinked" the homeowners by neglecting to tell them that the product had a latent defect that would only show up at a later date. Liability of the builder (on any of the above counts) can be quite expensive. Several builders have had to pay sums equal to the price of the lot on which the home stood. Some of the builders have been able to bring in excavating contractors and make them share some of the liability, but it is still the builder's primary responsibility to know how to "do it right" and then to follow through and actually see that it is done right. Failure to observe that simple rule can be very, very expensive. one lawsuit (and the legal fees a builder has to pay for defense) can wipe out the profit on many homes. 21 Minneapo US St Saturday June. 7/1986 f y ', ._ tom' Y <. . Y ^.( + •'•• / { , . ;i• ti •• .• {' • ., . M*-• },.,Y • • 'r I'r V' r•v «, a•f f '',0 . 1,,•.,.,r 4 _ ` ri ,,;' ?! i rdfNK - ',1 I'.;C` r • rYM. 1 !'•r JI ' lA' s i r• rt . • t ' p ,y L. 1• . + • f . • lr., 4 L . " '+ l ; 1 • S . S ' . } ,, , • ' ,i 1 r '- ,,. y 4 P3 U, r ••., t'• ..4;ti,•'. ' t 7: 1, .M4i: '' ', 1l rJ'`, r i , !+ r _i ' s.' * ^' 1 ! • ,, ''a Ye_ -. ;,r ',"' 1 t : y <" • ., 7 y r f 1,1 . r l ^tEt},Jlt (itlj` • r } • •• 1 i 1 a+, R. {N .1, •Sf y x• 14 '"•r. f '/ t '1l ' • • • 1 L7 1+'n,r,r ••• Y f , } t r , , ['.. ` ; 1 TTT 3 f •''• • ( • _ _ fir 'j '}Y( , ' •. , .. • 'i•4•. 1 t•. •S j ti• 1S Valli 11421 M I, A. ` rf 1 • . -' ,• .. • * . .. ''..•• ; . 1', *j'•• +• ' • r '.t r d fl t, /,• , •. ,•... f .'• t• . I . , , t f , N "Y.....'^" w1 • v i. w.r•.• L f ........ '.r .. l+ . i { r •I"' . Stall Photo by Donna Torok Of the 14 trees that once shaded Andrea and Gordon Weber's lot, all that r ©mains is the woodpile on which their children are playing. f r s r can , 1 t t. ', , 1 dismayed m'e buyers learn B Ingrid Sandstrom the wide canopies of l oak and ash "We were heartsick." he Bald. "It ; ; .;' S ; • By g Staff Writer trees with trunks 18 to 30 inches In was almost like a loss of a family member when the trees camediameter . - -' . `• s ,,...'' ,, •. Gordon and Andrea Weber had down. We lost their shade and we 1l 1 '' --•''" ' ' •• privacy. .The trees Kent : . ' .Y., saved a long time for their dream When the leaves came out that lost p y fir ,. , , r.r,• .• .. • 4 house. They shopped carefully for 9 sprink, their ic t looked Just as the across the back of our lot at the •;.,•, •,i •• ' , •. ++ w give their three builder had said it would --- like a bottom of a hill. Now when we sit + •+j.s 1y lot E tr a t wouldl r •'' r ... •ar+Y• °'mar .; . w children room to play, with trees park, Gordon Veber s•zld. But by on our desk, everyone behind us on a ... -VAA fy Ory %.-. big enoubh to strode the house and the next sprinK, the beautiful trees the hill is looking down right at us. ""f' "' ;,Y,.,; ,'• ?1* jP `: ,, - r'"r"+^•. yard. were dead, killed by a land .., ,,.. Y• .• ,... '" *4.*A fj'.,w,dA0 ..,' w- r••L:.... -*.. y 'r development contractor who, What happened to the webers Is not • ~• • ,;. , r''T'..•'• - t',.G""'"''''t"``•e i , 1 +- •% '.+., g1p',.j "i.,4+ t i ty,• 1 "' 1.'1. •." +'r y . •- They found just the right spot. !n, experts later determined, had plied • uncommon in the Twin Cities area, r•' (j •- "" – . '- " • : - - (- ' alt later killed by till dirt. r,;tS•.•1.+. "''F ""= hlaple Grove and, in the winter of ^ ;;dirt four to six feet deep around tht When the Webers' house large was under construction, the backyard 1981, their house was built under(.. 1,: 7 trees, suffocating their roots. I Trees continued on page 2S had a row of large trees -- - l ie be home b refinancers The narrowing rate Rap added to her about misleading advertising (by doubts, since she already had a loan lenders or bullders ),•' said Herschel the rates dipped below 10 percent March, the lowest in nearly ell; at 121.', percent — "no! had,' she Elkins• chief of the consumer IFS- years. noted. i ;ut it's tt;e cost of refinancing section of the state attorney f;encr- and financing tt,,at is discouraging al's office, "but I am hearing a lot of They were Kapp} with the lc but some homeowners and surprising disappointment." rates," he said, points and oth fees added so substantially . to t' others. lie has heard from people who I haven't run across an), complaints bought or refinanced homes when fees continued on p.rf;e 3S 22 t achment 6 lilDY2 r' Y ' Zr.. 'YA V z' *aw'•YL 91/! +• +. E rvA . t".J Y 1rL_'ff. •w • r1 t .r. ^, iii, y]yt,."w 'TyT"' ; j •1„i '• ,,„, • R', r, ' .% .i ' ' ••, ..• .ni ,•,` ,.. r s~ ` . * rt•.,^ }rr , , t! . i/ , . to A . r...,'' _' __ VI' rte^ 4- t 1gSt`, . f + • i._ r. " tip'` . " ".,+',..• . '-! • Y' " t1 ' •jy a "r"1. t 1+ rl i T, r`. 5• t` l (` 4 , •1 ` C.,;2 . 'K „'r 1,•„ ."' I"A '` fj, r t .`' 4'.' .., . j L .•' { ,, • ' WT 44 , ` a J 1 v • ft 3- i : '- - r , t •; . ' e -. t t M `.. +! r,•, d ' , ,. • . • \ *f. • ., . , . • fr t 4t. ?„ • - '••. j ' t• C ; e..•... -- !, r.-.y - ' lt: r:~ Z• . ] t„ j v tip' It J i j if': , r.+r • •! ` • , .: i.• • Ord f `.;., r. r t .. .`J: s 4' rpt j, • . i M 1 r t M i . 1, . . i' , `'.+. .r•' 7` r il ,f a Y `1 411 t: • w M j t/y 1` i .•- 1 ` •` r • t # - '1 . ! • i t i \.. J• , ` ! ' I V , , 'S i , {`,' yy t t ! , J• Kr! 1tiIy.Y ; V, R . . S y /"_.Y,,,•'«, • f : s t' 1 i . •• ! . ,,, • (.. R - r ?' lr'7<" ,r t r Ir`er t f j r , r. Y •gat •. '•i•'i• f ; \' - ` i."y..w.,,i a.r.. .1 k- ••:.Sa •^..• ... '. t t •1 ^ .. If M ! ' A , •' 1 l +'• • . NL rte -.4 { J • I• w: 1. ,, - r1.,'•a ^ , •. fr4 r y ( + t., r y1 , •'•!:...., r r.. .t ry. •.f4e ~ _•'•i.` -L t • 1 ' y, • , ! `'%• . 'r', • ' v L, 1 !' /' /• , .• _•.. r• C . f/' y%Y"•. L•,.. Ili w :. .v.lti1: J' • ;. t , +' ,•1'+V•` ~• ,i +'''!.^l , ' > .+• I. ~, 64, J'`'"' -,:t i.M.,„ A: is"%"'f 1.•`,.•.,,jj//.. t * ..,,11 ^ ' w. K"'''i rf • ..: w%.Y 4k•' .' ",pax .+ .. r • , .• };. . .-", , A"'`'r>'•i ..,,.'+""^' .rMY .•i" , t[•:Y," lt'w''. T ..•` p 1.1 i ,T ') 4 ir:.l • • `'`: '4l:• ~ a.. r ! .!•..• •., . r w .€ - • '•j \`' Kw' f.• f,} ` 1 • `,' yi c Vj/ / •; ,. +r M`,7•'.•vr' +• f ". KV I ": .4'•"' ..I..VW ~ tt`',`,. j''•~• vl,/.'.1i ti,•. •, -,.r•7"•. - ` • iJ", •..1 i u.• •. A. i,•r. T J'f•'•""s. .:y{ -' '- 1`.., %•t•,.`,•:•i+.•...•' -r• a t.. j •• ^ +.'., i-'`•1•`.•.•t,'r• ,• .'r•'` a /y'::•• f Ll ;.: t "' 1 ' • l `.a ` 'J * . , ' • 1 . ,• "+t •+!' ' '•r•b„ ,.•. • ` ti X :a.:. • ,.'!; `` w t, ly . r tT ! l: '.•' i{ .•. ° .4• • /".. t' 3 ` '{' ,.! S,' ,,'.• ••. K o .._ ,.I r t " ,:,\. ! 1 \. .. ,. . ' • IL lip- t Stull Photo by Donald Dinck To save oak trees around this house In Bloomington -,, the developer made surd that old root system were not suffocated by new till dirt.. Preserving trees becomes a Very Trucks and other equipmentTreesContinuedfrompageISexpensiveproposition.!" Graham shouldn't be parked under trees said.. "To save the trees, you're using because exhaust and hot gases can said Don Willeke, a lawyer and inches of soil over a tree's root more land, and then If you have to harm the trees, an.d the equipment chairman of the state Shade Tree system, which spreads beyond the fence the trees, you're getting to a can compact the ground. Wounds or Advisory Committee. leaf line, usually will cause most point where people (with rno erase scratches In ca,'aks should be mature trees to die within two year's. Incomes) can't afford the houses on immediately treated with a seating, 1 would say It's a very major Contractors often spread dirt to level them." compound. problem," he said. "1 think it's done a sloped lot, but the compacted soil all the time around the area, and 1'd can cut of( the oxygen supply to the Graham said his firm puts snow French and Shirley suggest calling In say we're losing millions of dollars tree's fine hair roots. Because trees fences around trees to protect them landscape' architects or tree worth of trees." crap store a tat of energy, It can take from harm and to keep vehicies specialists to help determine which two to three years for them to die. from driving across the roots if the trees are valuable and worth caving. Armed with testimony from ground has to be graded near a Most communities In the area have prominent tree specialists and 9 Cutting roots for a foundation or mature tree, his company builds a city foresters who can recommend nursery and forestry experts, the for sewer or utility lines may kill the well around the base of the tree to appropriate consultants, Shirley said. Webers sued the land developer, part of the tree fed by those roots. If allow the roots to get the air Ivey Their case was resolved out of court the rooLi are heavily disrupted, the need. "People get professional advice and they received a cash settlement whole tree may die. "I don't when they're making plans for their of about $20,000. recommend building a house very Some trees do have to come down homes for any number of things," close to a tree, because without the because they are In the middle of a French said. "it costs a lot of money That paid for removing. the dead root system, some or all of the tree lot, "but we try to minimize loss," to take a tree down, and It only takes trees and planting a few will die," French sald. "Sometimes Graham said. "Stilt. It gives me an a professional a few minutes to give replacement ones — two ash trees, a people have actually built their eerie feeling to have to cut down a advice about saving one." Norway maple, a clump birch and house around a tree, or a deck 200-year-old tree." an American linden — trees around a tree. That's a poor Home buyers should ask the described by the Webers' lawyer as Investment." Willeke and French, by string the consultants for references and check buggy whips "with diameters of 2 to problem of construction-kilted trees, the references. "Minnesota tacks 3 Inches. But because of Maple in the case of oaks, which often " are holding up a rightful flag." said some sort of monitoring or minimum Grove's heavy clay soil, three of the are considered the most desirable Glen Shirley, who has been standards for this trade." French. trees died. So they keep pinnting trees on wooded lots, nny kind of cut ! Bloomington's city formter for 14 said. new ones. or nick In a tree can Invite (tie years. "There should be more Insects that carry oak wilt disease, t awareness on the public's account", It all else /alts, there are legal Dead trees often are passed off by particularly In May and June, remedies. builders or developers as French said. "Bark beetles can feed Shirley. who was hired Just as Dutch ' unavoidable, caused by oak wilt or on even the healthiest elm trees, elm dtsease was moving into "Minnesota courts have been other disease, said John Daniels, causing Dutch elm disease," he said. Bloomington, has since seen trees in conscious of the difference between Willeke's law partner, who "But a healthy. oak can't be damaged his city killed by what he calls "cut a shade tree and mere timber," represented the Webers In their by oak wilt unless there Is n wound and fill" land - development work for % Daniels said. "There are cases going lawsuit. But in many cases the In the tree -- even the smallest houses. But the good word back to the 1970s that recognize that deaths are preventable, experts say. wound or broken branch." apparently is spreading, he "Id, and a tree on a residential or lately he's seeing more developers commercial lot is shade and has a 1 think the way building practices A home site dotted with mature trees spending time and money to save value that Is different from a certain have been In Minnesota, a lot of usually Is more expensive than a trees. 'x' number of board feet." trees have been lost due to cleared lot, but unless the trees are construction that didn't have to be avoided and protected, "You may Before buying a wooded lot, Why would anyone Rant to save a lost," said David French, head of the just he buying a lot of very green potential buyers should talk to the tree anyway? Plant Pathology Department at the firewood," Wlileke saald. "it's sad land developer as well as the builder University of Minnesota, who was because you cannot replace a 100- to determine which trees are going "Trees Soften the landscape and among those called In to confirm the year -old or 200 -yenr -old tree. It It to be saved and protected. French make It more attractive. They dlagnosls on the Webers' trees, dies, you'll never see Its like agaln, said. If the base of a tree trLnk on provide wind protection, shadlniti and unless you live a lot longer than t the lot Is not enlarged, or If no cooling In summer." F=rench said. There are a lot of builders who do hope to." buttress roots can be seen, s::spect.a "In the fall, they drop their leaves take care, and with knowledge and land fill. and we have to rake them and so , care. this doesn't faave to happen," Thomas Graham, of Graham they give us exercise." French staid. Development Co., 19 one of several The trees that are to be S-1ved should local land developers who be fenced — "And I d.on't moan The deaths of otherwise healthy consclousty work to preserve trees putting a little piece of v.•Ire around • . , trees can be attributed to several on home sites, said French, who ha3 the stem of the tree," French sald. construction related causes: advised Grahnm on tree "You could stilt bring into that with a preservntlon for several years. bulldozer." 1 Putting more than three or four 23 Lovely town hurries ate atilscer'it to park tvtt paths, Ftamtcs 21114`5, 24y baths, walkout f garage, near Downtown on bus line. Priced fro Direcilons: Cty. Rd. 18 to Medicine Ut. Rd., Hours: Open Sat. thry Th Other times by appoint PHEASANT 2426 Ni Gii 5 GLEN.-..- Rcaltor Quality BI RU EM Ga Now you too can enjoy, the relaxing atmospher Lakeside Court home built by Mary Anderson. Mary Anderson homes are for discriminating buye to using only quality materials. And when it comes Rheem is the worlds largest maker of gas water hea and quality team up for a dependable, energy effic Models in lakeside Courts, Plymouth, are open 1:1 Monda Ihre +ugh Friday, There are a few Lake I, avall,ll,le, I R )M i I (x),(XX)• Call Mert Jacobson 553.1101 LAKESIDE COURTS: Dir. 494 to Co. 9 East t mi. to Zachary lane, 1 mi. N. to Schmitt Lake Rd., It-it S blacks to forest View lane and It-11 4 ltimeks to I tke;•side (mutt nin e•l. Mary Anderson Hones 8901 Lyndale Ave. S., Bloomington, Pho t The °ass is an4 t C l.. l l Kel ql. ' to ••''•••' , M ' : 'w •y '. i,i,. , l ... IN And at Kenwood Isles Condominium Seniors, our home owners rejoice in freedom. Finding; time, now for shot and Calhoun Square, v1 al.ks around I wellness classes at.the adjacent Y\X1( i A move to Kenwood Isle's Is well de: you think. Just ask an)'one who lives t And tic sure to visit our six KE 1V V V COMMUNITY SERVICE EXECUTIVE PROGRAM 521 -11 -01 3M Center St. Paul, Minnesota 55144 612/736 3930 September 19, 1989 Mayor and Council C-Ity of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN .55109 Ladies and Gentlemen: My wife and I are residents of Maplewood,, We own. a home at 530 i arnie Street, which 1 s 3ust south of Lower Afton Road. The purpose of this letter is to voice our strongfortheproposedordinancerelating-to preservat ionion of large trees. A conflict in our schedule prevents usfro bei n g p r esent at the hearing on September 25. We built our home last year. We purposely sought an area which was naturally wooded. We worked with our contractorGordieHoweofMasterpieceHomes) to r of the large reserve as many ge trees on the lot as we could.. He was veryhelpfulandcooperativeindoingthis . Some of the builders in our area • have been very serous about preserving the large trees*. Masterpiece Homes andAmericanEstateHoniesaregoodexamplesofthis. Yet wehave. seen developers and builders crowd homes together on .relatively small 1 g Y lots in wooded areas, which means that most of the trees.on these lots have to be destroyed, We have seen builders trenchench for utilityity 1 i nes beneath the drip line of large trees and then have seen these samelargetreesdieoneortwoyearslater, We have seen wherebuildershavepiledfillaroundthebaseoftreesandthenhaveseenthetreesdieayearortwolaterbecausethefillpreventsairfromgettingtothe9roots, 24 Attachment 7 v Mayor and Council /City of Maplewood September 19.,.1989 Page 2 We believe that large trees are a very valuable natural resource which should be preserved . to whatever extent possible. They add much to the beauty of the area and they are sanctuaries for birds and wildlife. Trees also do much to serve as wind breaks in the wintertime. even when they have no leaves and therefore cause us to expend less on heating energy than we would otherwise. We applaud the time, talent, research, and thoughtful effort which.have gone into the proposed ordinance; we urge your adoption of it. We believe that Maplewood can be a leader i n . an area which has long needed attention but which very few communities have done anything about. In the words of the poet, Joyce Kilmer, "Only God can rake a tree." Let us not needlessly destroy this precious creation i n the guise of ,, progress." Sincerely, Calvin W. Pipal CWP : dg 25 26 Attachment 8 Planning Commission Minutes 8- -21 -89 VII NEW BUSINESS A. Code.Amendment Environmental Protection ordinance Secretary Olson presented the staff report regarding the revision of the Environmental Protection ordinance to provide more protection for significant trees. A commissioner asked staff if a developer.cuts a number of the original mature trees, could the developer replace these trees.with a small number, of conifers and still fulfill the requirements of the ordinance. Staff said the density could be reduced by 20 %, as opposed to the current ordinance which does not allow the City to save any trees. A commissioner asked how long a period of time a developer was responsible for replacing existing trees which may be damaged by.grading equipment. Staff said they must determine at the time the grading inspection is done what trees must be replaced. The chairman asked if anyone from the audience wished to speak. There were no comments. Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the revised Environmental Protection ordinance. Commissioner Ayers seconded Ayes -- Ayers, Barrett, Cardinal, Fiola, Sigmundik, Sletten 27 01 bi r Act '.i, r Endorsed Mod. l i e MEMORANDUM Re j ecte , date TO • City Manager FROM: Ken.Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Registered Land Survey LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Highway 61 and Kohlman Ave. APPLICANT /OWNER: Donald and Irene Bartlett DATE: October 12, 1989 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting the approval of a registered land survey (RLS) to divide one parcel into three lots. The purpose is to allow Angus Meats, the house at 1236 Kohlman Avenue and the cabins south of Angus Meats to be sold as separate lots BACKGROUND April 19, 1973: The City Council approved a 125.0- square -foot addition to the Angus Meats building subject to: 1. The installation of a walkway along the west side of the building expansion area; 2e Extending the paved parking area on the west side an additional 30 feet to the south; 3. The required off - street parking spaces shall be designated and properly - marked. DI.S CUS S I ON The lots of meet all City ordinance requirements. Ten feet of additional right -of -way would be dedicated for Kohlman Avenue. This is because Kohlman Avenue currently has forty feet of. right -of -way and City standards usually require sixty feet of right -of -way for a. pub! ic street. This dedication is shown as Tract D on the submitted plans as shown on page 6. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the parking lot so that it is expanded to the south, including the addition of a backing area and a dumpster pad. He is also proposing to remove the driveway to Kohlman Avenue and some of the existing blacktop on the north side of the parking area. As noted in the background portion of this report, the parking lot was required to be expanded and marked as a condition of approval for the building expansion in 1973 The elimination of the street access to Kohlman Avenue should be safer for vehicles due to the hill and sight lines on Kohlman Avenue, Staff has noted that a portion of the area designated for parking and for the dumpster pad. on the .submitted plans currently has a dirt surface. City Code requires a paved surface and striping ..for of f- street parking areas . In addition, the dumpster is stored on'the grass by the southwest corner' of'. the :building. Section 36-27(e) of City Code requires that .,-100% opaque .enclosures be 'placed around all trash containers. Staff is recommending that a trash enclosure be added to this site to meet this code requirement. The Community Design . Review Board requires stop signs for all parking lots. Thus it has been. recommended that a state- approved. reflectorized stop sign be installed along the north side of the driveway as shown on the site plan. RECOMMENDATION Approve the registered land survey, subject to the following conditions being completed prior to the City signing of the RLS. As an alternative, the applicant may submit an escrow in an amount. and form suitable to staff to ensure that all of the conditions of approval are met. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Submittal to the City of a signed deed for Tract D the northern ten feet of the property) for additional Kohlman Avenue right -of -way. The dirt areas of the parking lot and the dumpster pad shall be surfaced with bituminous and shall be subject to the approval of City staff. The parking lot shall be striped in such a manner which is consistent with the City's off- street parking regulations.. Such a plan shall be subject to City staff approval. The trash dumpster shall be stored in a screening enclosure with a 100% opacjue wooden gate and shall be a color and material compatible with the Angus Meats building The enclosure shall be protected by concrete- filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structure, as required by Code. If the enclosure is masonry, the protective posts may be omitted. The enclosure plans shall be subject to the approval of City staff, The installation of a state - approved, reflectorized stop sign on the north side of the driveway. 0 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Gros .area (total) 47,167o20 square :feet (1,w08- acres) Tract "Ar' 16,462,20 square feet (. 3 8 acre ) Tract "B" : .8 , 058 7 0 square feet 18 acre) Tract "C" 21,096,80 square feet (*48 acre) Tract "D" : 11 54 9.50 square feet (. 104 acre) TOTAL 47 , 167.9 20 square feet (1,08 acres) Existing land uses:, An us Meat Market, a nonconforming single family dwelling and cabins SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Kohlman Avenue and a office building East: Single family dwellings South: Graystone Landscaping, Inc. West: Highway 61 and Kohlman Lake Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan kenrmemo8 3 pop emu VADNA /S NE /GHTS CO RD "oM 19@ ........ , , I I I * * I * , * ................... Q v r o ST. 19. W E-A M Akwk AV ,... i .. .... :°f . , '',1 4A I 41 Az 22 Q Q void : 3 Koh /mon Lake / Lai . sovolo, cr 4 KO LMAN 13 AV w Co RD C a { Cn 4n 23 - a w j PALM N OLLJCR R N CT DE- I AV (1) 404YNOR AV 'r \ GT22 EXTANT 112 GERVAIS P AV > now "Wo PKWY LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment I GRANDVK:W oC VIKINGo . 4 44j 97 N. B. B. CO. 00 0 9!i yl b •t- t0 Z.7 V•40 fu 10 I ; 3Si N ,•U . ti 3 . -- II Ii (O4.o 60) 7 7 Ttp 1 w z MIS. W 15 4 *17 Z If l 2720 r. 2.7tlo do . ,' ` (3) .) l 1 c . . 49 ac ' 1 Angus Meats (-440)19 v 1236 `4 q N U& I r . 1247"A 1257 1263 ' ly Proposed Split U ne , OP 2700 _ ..» E12500 --Ko H L MAN A YX -o V. rl 6 9 o j0 !j A . n " , i • ` l . 3 I ac it 5 `. .30 &C . 1 JO • AC o s AXr G 1 7 I 13 9 W- loll 3 ' Ali ' 0 11 Z) i A •1 2688 I . XI 1,.) .017. N 3 -ry 3) F / _ 7v 49- S yo _._ . "T"" j C) fors• '' a l+ / t •iuc I gn .,, 5 _i fl 3 1 4 ( Z 11 wooft 1 f 1 n + 1.0 11 0 -7 - /'I1 - 4, 5O 7- 3 32 +3-a :3: 1 :n' 33 40 A4 1 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 0 Attachment 2 4 N PROPOSED REGISTERED LAND 'SURVEY. NQ. 1111» I've')' wN,I (rrayHrlt.) rill. INw) ill Ilw I•Irllu,wt I,r1 Ih'. N "oil 1.1 11.1111ut1 t f ",'r ilrrly (lnitlolt '. '. t 211111 IN•t Owletty /1N,d •'1" a1 -",• ° "'rti t,at. 14NI1, IN SSI off. 14111 •`'•. , 1 hr tlt,y cert11'y 111nT Ih1A ilun Allowil allrvoy wide toy ou.nr t1w l,rt .orty • •! "'r' • I1. ^II 1114 "1.l 1,11 1114, al luthl•J ,I wvt 1118"14,1. (. \ ..• • a ,+ Ilial ihr .M•,.vrlllt lt,nti nr the '1'rt1r1'A Ahr••u hve-q -4161 will 1%, $.A ", "1N• ruwl '17• i1',llir„ rilCt M •• 1, •h { r 1I 111 +rnv111 n( 01u 11CItirtt - &I 1.+91911 !lrvcv by It,•alev 1'uunly• 0.0 of 1. oa f. 1ira'wvJ all corners etwn on this MIM that said a 14 l + 1 r wAtsOr• / 12 /lit16iliu1J -1; :filinivnn uiitaioJlll/uKSOt+1 aiiwr,iiimyy6 W71223S tTFi'e'a""" A'4 is Imit! Sltrveying toleplrone (612) 129.71167 / S 47Sh Nanninr Ave., ' IyCM% 11. 0. Ions 111772 _ White Nuar iniv, M $51111 s—• 1 .f • ~ , .„• t 117r1i: a tlle irvariu spawnr+ spn huroon ern rorereticeJ to file Naauer County I • 44' +\t_ •f'r•,•t•s'a• p t:oortlinato Systuw' •/ ••••;% 1 • t• 88a/\ • ^ 10 11 to to AM it to for J6 HO to 4 w 1a. p . Ir <~ • •: X• % L • %• : `• ' :••••'• • ;••: ' ..• • • f T _` • al. a off , a a , ` 1.C+< I ' lot { rMWIMAw: • lArtytnae0. w 1110 : %:;:•' %', :•••`'.•:;: •t' • AwaY! fl • • , a to Q • • • • 11 1 O I i;• .':'' •• •1.H •M • p ' I1f ..•.1..a i 'D . a v 4• :'• '.? ;` ' rooft tw%"• a 1.H•ao 4wt ton • • ' • u 111 r, ;,.• :; • A it J~ f to a Ip 1. fit K •0000. 1YrA'11• M ~` •.. . ' tM1e ' I 609 V64 h4W46 64 00 j• • •, p, • . reNlr.A1I'e lAwlv,t.1 i y w " r 1..°a a. sevart 111 12 i CaH• 14-11 11sa tAa»t R V • r l off• ••aa •a.•a a:O -, • 0 • • • • r • 0 • • •, • • • II .±al. ••• • • w o w • • e • O • • • • • • t, • . r % 0 • • • L to •• • • •t1. '• • • • {• / • rr • ••• • • O• • .• wolf•• 1. r 9X 6—nlV 6 PAPOPICP-7-Y I— I IVE WtIT uNt of t' sea•1rWe tkas Ira •/./ roNfLMAIM eAAttTeMt ,AwesCAOtse INC / ocT N P11V6 fee r aleeTM KAl!• I'. te' ( LOT Ye M ry 1e• tM+.[ f •w1 Me t e 1I w•, son 1rpFV.atwT,•eywe 1lausev tt . H•ry w v a...1.. far •t•••1. j 9iill 10!• too" 0901 A •tI v•• lwow •,0! ITat ' 1 CA, wo 41811 p1iV•. /1tV•11rpVt /verAtR of 1t 1 tN•{t II c 1/4 coawllt a C1 tIC19O1 I ti'1eon) 94CTION . r,8e,11.0 t f...• U pot .' COUNTY ROAD utt2,.,y• •t.lutsa+' •tom C -" Ma•M a!Se esta as _ rule ttA• Seas 1 a••tt /e 00 eascer•ttewe AttACwte Lw- SITE PLAN A Attachment 3 4 N j t Action by Cou- nall:. MEMORANDUM n..ored Mod 1f ie ; TO: City Manager e j i FROM: Director of Community Development ected ..... SUBJECT: Truth-in-Sale of Housing ordinances DATE: October 5, 1989 . SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The City Council asked the Housing and Redevelopment Authority HR.A) to consider the adoption of a truth -in -sale of housing ordinance. This type of ordinance requires the disclosure or correction of housing maintenance code violations as a condition of.the sale of a residential property. The purpose of this type of ordinance is to disclose code violations and other housing defects to, prospe.cti.ve.buyers. If code compliance is included, there is the additional benefit of improving the City's housing stock and maintaining.property values. ALTERNATIVES There are three alternatives: 1 Disclosure only Independent inspectors would document housing code violations and other defects but compliance would not be required. The inspection report would have to be made R available when a residential building is shown and a copy given' to a buyer. This system is used by St. Paul, South St. Paul and Minneapolis. 20 Disclosure and Compliance as a Condition of Sale The Cities of New Hope and St. Louis Park use this alternative. Richfield is considering a similar ordinance. City :inspectors do all the inspections and require compliance as a condition of a sale. If code violation cannot be corrected before the closing, an agreement between the buyer and seller to do the work later must be submitted' to the city. These cities use city inspectors, rather than independent inspectors to do all the inspections. The insurance for independent inspectors may not cover code compliance, 3. Disclosure -as a Condition of Sale with Compliance Later This alternative is a hybrid of the first two and is recommended by staff on a trial basis for one y ear. Independent inspectors, hired by the homeowner, would disclose code violations and other housing defects. When i i i the disclosure report is filed with the City, a.City inspector would contact the owner to arrange for code compliance. The sale of the house, however, would not be conditioned on compliance.. DISCUSSION - Truth- in- housing.would help to protect home buyers and could help to ma inter i.n' the quality of housing in the City, particularly if code compl. i''ance is included. A disclosure . only program relies on the owner's discretion for code compliance. Given the older age, the larger number of homes and the larger number of code violations in the central cities, a disclosure only. system is probably the only practical program for the central cities. The trend in the suburbs is to include code compliance to avoid the housing problems of the central cities. The problem is in how.to implement code enforcement. St Louis Park and New Hope use city inspectors for all inspections. Richfield is considering hiring housing inspectors. Maplewood would have to do the same if we were to do all the inspections. The proposed ordinance is a compromise. It relies on independent inspectors to prepare a disclosure report, which includes City code requirements. City inspectors however, would do the follow -up work for any code enforcement.needed. Since the Maplewood housing code for single dwellings only covers the exterior property and dwelling, the enforcement work may be limited enough to be handled by existing personnel. This program should be tried for one year and reevaluated to determine if existing city p- ersonnel have been able.to handle the extra work and whether, we have been able to achieve compliance without tying it to the sale of the house. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt the attached truth -in -sale of housing ordinance and reevaluate it after it has been in effect for one year. 2. Adopt the attached resolution on page 10 establishing a 15 filing fee for each report. REFERENCE RESOURCE PERSONS 11 Minneapolis, St. Paul South Sto Paul, New Hope and St Louis Park have adopted some type of truth -in- housing code. Each of these communities has had their code in effect for at least ten years. These cities are convinced that their codes have improved routine maintenance of property. They also believe that they have resulted in the correction of numerous small deficiencies that could have led to larger problems. The requirement for disclosure of deficiencies to the code has also been well received by perspective home buyers. 2. Staff also spoke with Keith Holm, the Vice President of the Minnesota Board-of Realtors. Mr. Holm supports any effort on the part of cities to require disclosure of code deficiencies provided that the responsibility for any undisclosed problems does not transfer to the real estate agent. j 3. In the 1988 session of the legislature, a bill was introduced by Representative Alice Johnson of Spring Lake Park regarding housing disclosure The proposed law would require every seller of residential property to complete a disclosure questionnaire form and warranty that to the best of their knowledge there are no other problems than those noted with the property. The bill, however, did not get much support and is currently dead. Representative Johnson said that she may introduce the bill again in.the future but she is not sure when that might be. The housing inspector for New Hope believes that this law would complement their code compliance inspection program, because some code deficiencies are not detectable by an inspector. LAWSUITS An inspection cannot guarantee that a major problem will not occur. The inspector can only respond to the items that can'be seen. Even though the disclosure report clearly states that no guarantee is being made by the inspector, if a major problem arises, the buyer will likely attempt to recover damages from the seller, realtor and the City, particularly if the inspector is City employed. Both New Hope and St. Louis Park have been sued because an undetected problem arose after the buyer took possession., However, neither of these cities was held liable for damages because the inspectors made a reasonable attempt to disclose the deficiencies in these dwellings. 3 Enforcement o f a requirement for a housing inspection, prior to a home being shown to a perspective buyer will be difficult, at least untilthe code's existence is common knowledge among realtors .Sales that involve a contract -for -deed may never be able to be discovered until after the fact, if then. However, once the housing.inspection requirement is common knowledge, the real estatesales industry should be able to be relied upon for enforcement. The St. Paul Board of Realtors estimates that about 60 to 70 percent of the sales in the St. Paul area are handled by realtors. A housing inspection is in the realtor's interest, because its existence may reduce their liability exposure in the event a problem does arise after the sale of a property. Advertisement of the housing inspection requirement in the City's newsletter,, sewer bill inserts and sale -by -owner magazines should improve compliance among persons who choose not to sell their property through a.realtor. Minneapolis reports 100% compliance in better neighborhoods and 70 to 75% in poorer neighborhoods. 3 Inspections; St. Paul, Minneapolis and South St. Paul use city - licensed, independent inspectors for disclosure inspections. The average cost to the homeowner ranges from $80 to $110. If these cities were to require follow. -up compliance inspections, the fee paid by the seller to the independent contractor would at least double, possibly triple, depending upon the number of follow -up inspections needed There are no delays in inspections. St Paul has 42 licensed inspectors. Minneapolis has 65. St. Paul receives 4,500 to 6,000 truth -in- housing reports each year. New Hope and St. Louis Park use city employees to administer their programs. These communities subsidize the cost of their programs. They each charge $35 per property inspected. in St. Louis Park,!an inspector is kept busy on a full -time basis with housing inspections while in New Hope a certified building inspector charges about one -half of her time to their program. J About 250 to 300 inspections are made in New Hope each year. The City's annual subsidy for this service is estimated to be about 10,000 to $121000. Structures 'Inspected in Other Cities The code in ;New Hope applies to all residential units. The St. Paul code applies to single dwellings, townhouses, condominiums and mixed uses with two or fewer residential units. St. Louis Park and Minneapolis cover only single and double dwellings. South St. Paul's code only applies to single dwellings. 4 Emphasis of Code Code Compliance: The New Hope and.S.t..Louis Park.codes require the correction of all cited code deficiencies before the sale.of a residential property, unless an agreement is reached with the buyer to.assume responsibility. In which case, a compliance date for reinspection after possession by the buyer is set up which gives the buyer time to make the.required repairs.. Richfield is considering a similar ordinance. The age of Maplewood's housing is similar', to that of New Hope .and St. Louis Park. These cities use this program primarily.to upgrade and maintain their housing stock . Disclosure` Versus Compliance South St. Paul, St. Paul and Minneapolis have chosen not to require the disclosed deficiencies to be corrected. Code compliance :may not be cost - effective in many cases due to the age and number',of dwellings. Because of the potential for significant code deficiencies, these cities adopted their codes to inform unsuspecting home buyers of any major deficiencies before a financial commitment is made. These cities believe that once`.code deficiencies are disclosed, the sale price will be adjusted accordingly and the purchasers may take care of the problems on their own. TRUTH.MEM mb Attachments 1. Truth-in-Sale of - Housing Ordinance 2. Resolution for Fees 3., Owner - occupied Housing Maintenance Code 4.. Rental Housing Maintenance Code 5, St. Paul ' s disclosure form WRDINANCE 14 4. An ordinance Concerning Truth -in- sale -of- Housing THE . MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS T Section 1. Article XII, Truth -in- Sale- of- Housin g Ordinance is hereby added to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances. Article XYI Truth -in-- Sale -of- Housing Ordinance. Sec. 9-235. `` Purpose, The purpose of this article is to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to promote decent, safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations by requiring the disclosure of code deficiencies and housing information and defects as a condition of the sale'of housing. Information on code deficiencies would then be used by City inspectors to re quire compliance,, Sec 9 -2 3 6 . Definitions . For the purpose of this article, the following terms are defined as follows: Contractual agreement: An agreement, written or otherwise, between a buyer and seller for the conveyance of, or the t intent to convey, all or part of a housing unit or residential building. A contractual agreement shall include, but not be limited to, an earnest money contract, deed or purchase agreement. Housing unit: A single dwelling, a double-dwelling unit a townhouse unit, a.condominium unit (as defined by Minnesota Statutes), or any other attached housing unit designed for t the occupancy of one family. Owner:' A person having a vested interest in the housing unit or residential buildin g in question, including his orrg her duly- authorized agent or attorney, before a sale. Sale: ;The conveyance of a housing unit or residentialg building to a new owner, Residential building: A building containing one or more housing units. Sec. 9 -237.( Applicability. This article shall not apply to any newly constructed housi ng or residential building when the title is conveyed to the first owner, except that no owner shall convey or contract to convey a newly. - constructed. housing unit or residential building without first providing-t,o tthe buyer, a list of the names addresses and 6 f iir telephone numbers -of all of the contractors and subcontractors who constructed the building. Sec 9.-238.''0 Truth . in -Sa.le of Hous ing Disclosure Report. j a) An owner. shall not show a housing unit or residential building to a. prospective buyer without publicly displaying and making available a truth- in -sale of } housing disclosure report at the housing unit or residential building at the time of showing. In addition, a contractual .agreement shall not be executed without a copy of the disclosure report being issued to the buyer A copy of such report must be filed with the City to be valid. b) A housing disclosure report shall be on a form from the City which includes 1) A disclosure by a City- certified housing inspector.' ns ectorgp of violations of all City ordinances pertaining to existing housing and any other specified housing defects. Such ordinances shall include, but not be limited to, owner- occupied or rental housing maintenance codes, siding ordinances, dunk removal and hazardous buildings. 2) A signed statement by the owner that .includes the following information a. Any damage to the housing unit or building or its contents by flooding or sewer backup due to flooding, and any evidence of chronic water seepage of which the owner has knowledge. b. The nature, extent and cause of any water seepage or flooding of any portion of the property of which the owner has knowledge. c. Whether or not there are pending housing orders from the City regarding the property. S d. Whether there is a homestead classification in regard to real estate taxes payable. e. Any other known defects or problems that are not visible or apparent. f. Whether the property is subject to the Cit 's pipeline or shoreland ordinances, y g. The location and status of all known wells, including a map, statin g whether the well is in use or abandoned and sealed. 7 a) An owner.shall not show a housing unit or residentialto .a entlalbuildingprospectivebuyerwithoutpubliclyandmakingavailableatruth -in -sale ofhousingdisclosurereportat • p the housing unit. orresidentialbuildingatthetime ' of showing. Inaddition, a contractual agreementgeement shall not be executedwithoutacopyofthedisclosurere • port bung issued tothebuyer. A copy of such re port must be filed withththeCitytobevalid. b) A housing disclosure report shall be on a form from thepitywhichincludes:. 1) A disclosure b City-certifiedYa housing inspectorOfviolationsofallCityrdinances ex sting housin Y pertaining toggandanyotherspecifiedhousingidefects. Such ordinances shall g include, but notbelimitedto, owner-occupied-or • r p ed•or rental housing ; maintenance codes, siding ordinances jandhazardogancesunk removal us buildings. 2) A signed statement by the owner that includes thefollowinginformation: a. Any damage to the housing nit • g or building oritscontentsbfloodinggorsewerbackupduetoflooding, and an evidencee of chronicwagerseepageofwhichtheownerhas - knowledge. b• The nature extent and cause of any waterseepageorfloodingofanyportionoftpropertofwhich he Y the owner has knowledge, Co. Whether or not there are • pending housingordersfromtheCityregardingheg .property , d. f e f. g• Whether there is a homeste ad classificationinregardtorealestatetaxespayable.. Any other known defects or problems that are ; not visible or apparent, i i' i Any deed restrictions or. 'covenants runningwiththeproperty, Whether the property is subject t pipeline/ s to the City ,sphorelandorfloodplainordinances 7 i h. The location and status of all known wells including a map, stating whether the well is in use or abandoned and sealed. i. Whether the propert y adj acentisadjent to a hi gh - voltage transmission line.. If so, the disclosure form shall include the followin g statement "The subject ro ert is locatedppy near a high-voltage electric transmission line. Purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on possible potential i adverse health effects caused by the exposure. ` to a magnetic field generated by high-voltageglines. Although much more research is needed { before the question of whether magnetic fields actually cause adverse health effects can be resolved, the basis for such an hypothesis is established.. At this time' no risk assessments have been made." fl c) A truth -in -sale of housing isclosure' r valid g report shall be id for no more than one year front date of approval by the . City However, i f the City findy s that the circumstances of occupancy following the issuance of such report involve possible substandard maintenance or.= abnormal wear and tear, a new inspection ma y be ' required by the Director of Community DevelopmentYpt In order to.maintain.a valid report. f. Sec. 9-2390 Limitations, a) In making a housing inspection, it shall11 be assumed that any concealed facilities that are not viewed are ' i adequate based on the functional operationspions of the facilities and the condition of the equipment that is viewed no other warrant is expressed or implied, p b) Nothing in a truth -in -sale of ho using disclosure reportshallbedeemedtoindicatethataresidential ' building.. or housing unit meets all minimum g orbuildinstandards } that the report in any way may constitute a warrant oftheconditionofthehousingevaluatedTheinspectorwarrantsthatheorshe p has utilized reasonable careanddiligenceininspectingthebuildingndhasgfound no ,instances of.noncomplLance with the it ' ems containedinthereportorwithapplicableitemscontainedin City Code, except as specificallypy stated therein. Sec . 9 -2 4 0 Certificate of Competency-, p y• a a) No person shall fill out a truth-in-sale ' in sale of housingdisclosurereportwithoutossessinvalidpga certificate of competency, issued by the City* . The City will only a pp rove housing inspectors that have i passed competency tests as truth -in- housing evaluators in the cities of Minneapolis or St. Paul. The housing inspectors must submit certification papers to the City:, of Maplewood from the city where they are certified as truth -in- housing evaluators. Each inspector must also be licensed in the City of Maplewood. The City of Maplewood may then issue a certificate of competency which is valid for one year. The City may issue renewals of all such certificates. In case any certificates of competency shall lapse for a period of one year or more, then it shall be necessary for the person who held-such certificate to reapply to the City for renewal of such certi.f icate No holder of a certificate of competency shall allow said certificate to be used by another person. b) The City , Council . may revoke the certificate of z competency of a housing inspector for cause *. Written notification sent to the mailing address used in his or. her application for the certificate of competency shall be sent to the inspector at least ten days before the hearing listing the date, time and place of hearing andg o f the specific reasons for the suspens ion . The Community Development Director may, at his or her discretion, suspend the certificate of competency of a housing inspector pending a suspension hearing, Sec.' .9-241. Housing Evaluation Fees, The City Council shall establish by resolution, from time to time, ,a fee schedule for filing of truth -in -sale of housingdisclosurereportswiththeCity. Sec. 9-2430 Enforcement, Any failure by the owner to comply with the requirements of this article shall constitute a violation of the Code and a misdemeanor. In addition, if a house is sold without com 1 inPY g with this article, the current owner shall be required to bringthe.-housing unit or residential building into compliance with applicableCity Codes. Section 2 This ordinance shall take effect on April 1 199p 00 i i I i 9 10 Attachment 2 i f fs ARTICLE VII. OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE r Sec. 9 -134. Short title. This article shall be cited as the owner occupied housing mainte- nance code. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.010,1-22-81) Sec. 9 -131. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to establish minimum standards for the maintenance of . exterior areas of owner occupied housing, as well as interior areas of attached owner occupied dwellings. The general objectives shall include the following: 1) To protect the character and stability of residential proper- ties within the city; 2) To correct and prevent housing conditions that adversely affect or are likely to adversely affect the life, safety, general welfare and health, including the physical, mental and social 4 well- being of persons occupying dwellings within the city; 528 i j t i i! BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -134 3) To provide minimum standards ' for the maintenance of ex- isting residential. buildings and to revert deteriorationeterioration andblight., (Ord. No.. 496, § 215.020 1 -22 -51 t Sec. 9 -132. Applicability scopeYan This article shall apply to exterior areas of owner occupied dwell - ings and interior areas of attached owner occupied dwellings. heconstruction, repair or alteration of.residential ert shallroPPYall cam - ply with the provisions of this article and • the building and codes. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.030 1 22 SI) Sec. 9 -133. Rules of construction, j j For the purposes of this article the followingowing rules of construc- tion shall apply: 1) Words used , in the present tense include the future; words inthemasculinegenderincludethefeminineandneuter- the singular number includes the plural an • P d the plural. the singular. 2) Where terms are not defined in this sectionection and are defined , in the building bode or zoning cg ode, they shall have the meanings ascribed . g to them in the building code or zoningg 3) where terms are not define ' d in this article or in the building Y or zoning code, their common dictionary definitionsrYos shall apply. (Ord. No. 496, § 215..040, 1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -134. Definitions. For the purposes of this article the followinglowing .words, terms andphrasesshallhavethemeaningsrespectivelyascribedthissection: to th e by Approved, as applied to a material device tion shall m or method of construc- tion, approved by the enforcement officer under theprovisionsofthisarticle, or approved by other authority designatedbylawtogiveapprovalinthematterinquestion g Attached dwellings shall mean two 2 _ O or more dwelling units physically attached in construction such as condomin' iums, town- houses; double dwellings and quads. 529 12 i I i 9 -134 MAPLEWOOD CODE Building code shall mean the building code of the city, including the fire code. Dwelli ng unit is a single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent prwi- sions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. Enforcement officer shall mean the city manager or his author - ized representative. Exterior property areas shall mean open. space on the premises under the control of owners. of such premises. Extermination shall mean the control and elimination of rodents, or other pests by eliminating their harborage places; by removing or making inaccessible materials that may serve as their feed, by poi son spraying, fumigating, trapping or by another recognized and legal pest elimination method. Owner shall mean owner or owners of the freehold of the premises } or lessor estate therein. i. j Premises shall mean a lot, plot or parcel of land including the building or structures thereon. Workmanlike shall mean the standards of the trade. or industry involved. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.0401 1.22.81) Cross reference- -Rules of construction and definitions generally, § 1 -41 et seq. Sec. 9- 135. Exterior property areas. a Sanitation. All exterior property areas shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from any accumulation of refuse or garbage. b) Free from noxious weeds and pests. All exterior property areas shall be kept . free from species of weeds or plant growth, rodents, vermin or other pests which are noxious or detrimental to the public health. (Ord. No. 496, §.215.050, 1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -136. Exterior of structures. a) The exterior of all structures and accessory structures includ- ing detached garages, shall be maintained in a workmanlike state of maintenance and repair. 530 ; f i I 1:3 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -139 b) Every exterior wall shall be free of holes, breaks, loose or rotting boards or timbers, falling or loose stucco or brick, or sub- stantial amounts of peeling paint. c) All doors and windows shall be maintained in good repair, fit reasonably well within their frames, and be free of open breaks or holes..(Ord. No. 496, § 215.060, 1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -137. Interior areas of attached owner occupied dwellings. - a) The interior of every dwelling shall be maintained in clean I and sanitary condition, free of accumulations of garbage an(] refuse. s b) The interior. of every dwelling shall be maintained free from infestation of noxious insects, rodents and other pests. c) All plumbing systems shall be properly installed, connected and maintained in good working order, and must be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects. d) The storage of hazardous flammable liquids shall be prohib- ited. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.070,1-22-81) Sec. 9 -138. vacated dwellings, The owner of any dwelling which has been declared unfit for human habitation or which is otherwise vacant for a period of sixty 60) days or more, shall make same safe and secure so that it is not hazardous to the health, safety and welfare of the public and does not constitute a public nuisance. Any such dwelling open at doors and windows, if unguarded, shall be deemed to be a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public and a public nuisance within the meaning of this article. Upon failure of the owner to comply, the city may have such dwelling made safe and secure and assess the cost to the owner. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.080, 1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -139. hazardous building declaration. If a dwelling has been declared unfit for human habitation and the owner has not remedied the defects within a prescribed reason- able time, the dwelling may be declared a hazardous building and treated consistent with the provisions of state law. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.09011- 22 -81) . 531 14 i 9 -140 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 9 -140. Enforcement officer. It shall be the duty of the enforcement officer to enforce the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.100, 1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -141.: Inspection of dwellings generally. 1 The enforcement officer shall be authorized to make or cause to be made inspections to determine the condition (')f dwellings and premises in order to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the public. The enforcing officer, or his designated representatives, shall, with the permission of the owner, be authorized to inspect the exterior areas of any premises and the interior areas of attached dwellings at any reasonable time for the purpose of performing his duties under this article. If the owner, operator or person in posses- sion. of the dwelling shall refuse to consent to the inspection and there is probable cause to believe that .a violation exists on that particular premises, a search warrant may be obtained. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.110,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9-142. Compliance order. Whenever the enforcement officer determines that any dwelling or the premises, fails to meet the provisions of this article, he may issue a compliance order setting forth the violations of the article and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violations. This compliance order shall: 1) Be in writing; 2) Describe the location and nature of the violations of this article; 3) Establish a time for the correction of such violation and notify of appeal recourse; 4) Be served upon the owner. Such notice shall be deemed to be properly served upon such owner if a copy thereof is: a. Served upon him personally; or. b. Sent by registered or certified mail; or C. Upon failure to effect notice through a. and b. as set out in this section, posted. at a conspicuous place in or about the dwelling which is affected by the .notice. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.1209 1- 22 -81) 532 15 f BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9.93 t r- Secs. 9- 77- -9 -90. Reserved. ARTICLE VI. RENTAL ROUSING MAINTENANCE CODE Seca 9 -91. Short title. This article shall be cited as the rental housing maintenance code. Ord. No. 486, § 214.010,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -92. Purpose; objectives. The purpose. of this article is to assume a minimum level of standards and levels of maintenance for rental housing in the city. The general objectives shall include the following; 1) To protect the character and stability of residential proper- ties within the city. 2) To correct and prevent housing conditions that adversely affect or are likely to adversely affect the life, safety, general welfare and health, including the physical, mental and social well -being of persons occupying dwellings within the city. 3) To provide minimum standards for cooking, heating and sanitary equipment necessary to the health and safety of occupants of the buildings. 4). To provide minimum standards for light and ventilation, necessary.for health and safety. 5) To provide minimum standards for the maintenance of ex- isting residential buildings, and to thus prevent deteriora- tion and blight. (Ord. No. 486, § 214-020,6-5-80) Seca 9 -93. Applicability and scope. ' This article shall apply in the city to rental housing only. The construction, repair or alteration of residential property shall com- ply with the provisions of the rental housing maintenance code. Any alterations thereof or changes of use therein, which may be caused directly or indirectly by the enforcement of this Code, shall be done in accordance with applicable sections of the building code and zoning code. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.030, 6 -5 -80) 5.11 9-94 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 9 -94. Rules of construction. For the purposes of this article, the following rules of construc- tion shall apply: 1) words used in the present tense include the future; words in the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter; the singular number includes the plural and the plural the singular. 2) where terms are not defined in this article and are defined in the building code or zoning code, they shall have the mean- ings ascribed to them in the building code or zoning code. 3) Where terms are not defined in this article or in the building or zoning code, their common dictionary definitions shall control. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.040(1)- --(3), 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -95. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words, terms and phrases. shall have the following respective meanings ascribed to them by.this section: . Approved, as applied to a material, device or method of construc- tion, shall mean approved by the enforcement officer under the provisions of this article, or approved by other authority designated by law to give approval in the matter in question. Basement is that portion of a building between floor and ceiling, which is partly below and partly above grade, but so located that the vertical distance from grade to floor below is less than the vertical distance from grade to ceiling. . Building code shall mean the building cede of the city, including the fire code. Cellar is that portion of the building between floor and ceiling which is wholly or partly below grade and so located that the verti- cal distance from grade to floor below is equal to or greater than the vertical distance from grade to ceiling. Dwelling unit is a single unit providing complete, independent r living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provi- sions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. 512 17 i BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -95 Enforcement officer shall mean the city manager or his author - ized representative. Exterior property areas shall .mean open space on the premises under the control of owners or operators of such premises. Extermination shall mean the control and elimination of insects z rodents or other pests by eliminating their harborage plinces, by removing or making inaccessible materials that may serve as their feed, by poison spraying, fumigating, trapping or by another recog- nized and legal pest elimination method. Grade shall mean the vertical location of the ground surface. Gross floor area is the sum of the horizontal areas of the several floors of all buildings on a lot, measured from the exterior faces ,of exterior walls or from the center line of walls separating two (2) buildings. Habitable space (room) is space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating or cooking. Bathrooms, toilet compartments, closets, halls, storage or utility space, and similar areas are not considered habit- able space. Infestation shall mean the presence, within or contiguous tP g. oa dwelling or premises, of noxious insects, rodents, vermin or other pests. Multiple dwelling. a building or portion thereof containing two 2) or more dwelling units. Dccupant shall mean any person living and sleeping in a dwelling unit or having actual possession of said dwelling or rooming unit. Openable area shall mean that part of a window or door which is available for unobstructed ventilation and which opens directly to the outdoors. ' Operator shall mean any person who has charge., care or control of a multiple residence or roorning house, in which dwelling units or ' rooming units are let or offered for occupancy. lOwnershallmeanownerorownersofthefreeholdofthepremises or lesser estate therein, a mortgagor or vendee in possession, as- signee of rents, receiver, executor, trustee, lessee or. other person, f 9 -95 MAPLEW00D CODE firm or corporation in control of a building, including their manag- ers and agents. t Person shall mean an individual, firm, corporation, association or partnership. Plumbing or plumbing fixtures shall mean water heating facili- ties, water pipes, gas pipes, garbage disposal units, water closets, waste pipes, sinks, installed dishwashers, lavatories, bathtubs, shower baths, installed clothes - washing machines or other, similar equip- ment, catch basins, drains, vents, or other similarly supplied fix- tures, together with all connections to water, gas, sewer or vent lines. Premises shall mean a lot, plot or parcel of land, including the building or structures thereon. Rental dwelling. Any building or portion thereof which is desig- nated or used primarily for residential purposes, which is rented or 4 leased to another and not owner- occupied. Residence building shall mean a building in which sleeping ac- commodations or sleeping accommodations and cooking facilities as a unit are provided. Residential property shall mean a building in which sleeping acoommodations or sleeping accommodations and cooking facilities as a unit are provided. Rooming house shall mean any residence building, or any part thereof, containing one or more rooming units, in which space is rented by the owner or operator to three (3) or more persons who are not husband or wife, son or daughter, mother or father, sister or brother of the owner or operator. Rooming unit shall mean any roam or group of rooms forming a single habitable unit used or intended to be used for living and sleeping, but not having standard kitchen facilities. Supplied shall mean installed, furnished or provided by the owner or operator. Ventilation shall mean the process of supplying and removing air y by natural or mechanical means to or from any space. 514 19 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -97 Workmanlike. Whenever the words "workmanlike state of main- tenance. and repair are used in this chapter, they shall mean the standards of the trade or industry involved. Yard shall mean all ground, lawn, court, walk, driveway or other open space constituting part of the same premises as a residence building. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.040(4),6-5-80) Croes reference -- Rules of construction and definitions generally, 1 -41 et seq. Sec. 9796, Exterior property areas. All properties in the city under this article and the owners thereof shall comply with the following requirements: 1) Sanitation. All exterior property areas shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from any accumula tion of refuse or garbage. 2) Grading and drainage. All premises shall be graded and maintained so as to prevent the accumulation of stagnant water, except in natural occurring ponding areas on said premises, or within any building or structure located thereon. 3) Removal of snow and ice. The owner of a multiple family dwelling shall remove, or cause to be removed, all snow and ice from parking lots, driveways, steps and walkways on the premises, which may create a hazard to the public. 4) Free from noxious weeds. All exterior property areas shall be kept free from species of weeds or plant growth which are noxious or detrimental to the public health. 5) Insects and rodents. Every owner of a dwelling shall be responsible for the extermination of noxious insects, rodents, vermin or other pests in all exterior areas of the premises. 6) Accessory structures. All accessory structures, including de- tached garages, shall be maintained structurally sound and in good repair. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.060,6-5-80) 7) t,,. - 1 .- , Sec. 9 -97. Exteriors of structures. All properties in the city under this article and the owners thereof shall comply with the following requirements: f 515 9 -97 MAPLEWOOD CODE 1) Foundations, walls and roofs. Every foundation, exterior wall, roof and all other exterior surfaces shall be maintained in a workmanlike state of maintenance and repair: a. The foundation elements shall adequately support the building at all points. b. Every exterior wall shall be free of holes, breaks, loose or rotting boards or timbers, falling or loose stucco or brick, substantial amounts of peeling paint and any conditions which might admit moisture to the interior portions of the walls or. to the interior spaces of the dwelling- c. The roof shall be tight and have no defects which admit rain, and roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent rain water from causing dampness in the walls. 2) Stairs, porches and railings. a. Every outside stair, every porch and every appurtenance attached thereto shall be so constructed as to be safe in use and capable of supporting a load as determined in the building code, and shall be kept in sound condition and good repair. b. Every flight of stairs which -is more than four (4) risers high shall have hand rails which are to be so located as determined by the building code; and. every porch which is more than eighteen (18) inches above grade shall have rails so located and capable of restraining a horizontal pressure, as determined by the provisions of the build- ing code. 3) Windows, doors and hatchways. Every window, exterior door and hatchway shall be substantially tight and shall be kept in sound condition and repair. a. Every window shall be fully supplied with window panes which are without open cracks or holes. b. Every window sash shall be in good condition and fit reasonably tight within its frame. c. Every window, other than a fixed window, .shall be ca- pable of being easily opened and shall be held in an open or closed position by window hardware. 516 21 r i i BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -98 d. Every exterior door, door hinges or door latch shall be in good condition, e. Every exterior door, when closed, shall fit reasonably well within its frame. { f. Every window, door and frame shall be constructed and maintained in relation to the adjacent wall construetions, as to exclude rain, and substantially to exclude wind from entering the dwelling. g. Every hatchway shall be so constructed. and maintained as to prevent the entrance of rodents, rain and surface drainage water into the dwelling. h. Every door available as an exit in a dwelling shall be capable of being opened from the inside, easily and with - out the use of a key, or special knowledge or effort. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.07016-5-80) Sec. 9 -98. Interior structures. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall meet the following requirements: 1) Free from dampness. All cellars, basements and crawl spaces shall be maintained- reasonably free from dampness to pre- vent conditions conducive to decay and deterioration of the structure. 2) Structural members. The supporting structural members shall be maintained structurally sound; that is, showing no evi- dence of deterioration and being capable of bearing; imposed loads in accordance with the provisions of the building code. 3). Interior stairs and railings. a. All interior stairs shall be maintained in sound condi- tion and good repair by replacing treads and risers that evidence excessive wear or are broken, warped or loose. Every inside stair shall be so constructed and maintained as to be safe to use and capable of supporting a load, as' determined by the provisions of the building code. b. Every stairwell and every flight of stairs, which is more than fou_ (4) risers high, shall have handrails or railings so located in accordance with the provisions of the build- ing code. 517 22 9 -98 MAPLEWOOD CODE c. Every handrail or railing must be firmly fastened and must be maintained in good condition. Properly secured railings, capable of bearing normally imposed loads as determined by the. building code, shall be placed on the open portions of the stairs, balconies, .landings and stairwells. 4) Bathroom floors. Every toilet room floor surface and bath- room floor surface shall be constructed and maintained so as to be substantially impervious to water and so as to permit such floor to be easily kept in a clean'and sanitary condition. 5) Sanitation. The interior shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from accumulation of refuse or garbage. 6) Insect and rodent harborage. The owner of every dwelling shall be responsible -for the extermination of noxious insects, rodents, vermin or other such pests whenever an infestation exists in. the interior of the dwelling. 7) Interior walls, floors, ceilings and woodwork. All interior walls, floors, ceilings and associated woodwork or trim must be maintained in a sound condition and in a workmanlike repair. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.0809 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -99. Basic facilities. The following facilities shall be required in every occupied dwell- ing unit in the city under this article: L) K'i.tchen.facilities. Every kitchen shall include the following. a. A kitchen sink in good working condition, properly con - nected to an approved water supply system, which pro - vHes at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated running water under pressure, and which is connected to an approved sewer system. b. Cabinets .or shelves for the storage of eating, drinking and cooking equipment and utensils and for food that does not require refrigeration for safekeeping; and a counter or table for food preparation. Said cabinets or shelves and counter or table shall be adequate for the permissible occupancy of the dwelling unit and shall be of sound construction, finished with, surfaces that are 518 23 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -99 easily cleanable and that will not impart any toxic or deleterious` effect to food. c. A stove or similar device for cooking food, and a refrig- erator or similar device for the safe storage of food, which are properly installed with all necessary connec- tions for safe, sanitary and efficient operation; provided that, such stove, refrigerator or similar devices need not be installed when a dwelling unit is not occupied and when the occupant is expected to provide same on occu- pancy, in which case sufficient space and adequate con - nections. for the installation and operation of said stove, refrigerator or similar device must be provided. 2) Toilet facilities. within every dwelling unit there shall be a nonhabitable room with an entrance door which affords pri- vacy to a person within said room and which room is equipped with a flush water closet in good working condition. Said flush water closet shall be equipped with easily cleanable surfaces, shall be connected to an approved water system that at all times provides an adequate amount of running water under pressure to cause the water closet to operate properly, and shall .be connected to an approved sewer system. 3) Lavatory sink.. within every dwelling unit there shall be a lavatory sink. Said lavatory sink may be in the same room. as the flush water closet, or if located in another room, the lavatory sink shall be located in close proximity to the door leading directly into the room in which said water closet is located. The lavatory sink shall be in good working condition and shall be properly connected to an approved water supply system and shall provide at all times an adequate arnount of heated and unheated running water under pressure and Shall be connected to an approved sewer system. Water iiflets for lavatory sinks shall be located above the overflow rim of { these facilities. 4) Bathtub or shower within every dwelling unit there shall be a room which affords privacy to a person within said room and which is equipped with a bathtub or shower in good working conditions. Said bathtub or shower may be in the C same room as the flush water closet, or in another room, and 519 24 9 -99 MA.PLEWOOD CODE shall be properly connected to an approved water supply system and shall provide at. all times an adequate amount of heated. and unheated water under pressure, and shall be connected to an approved sewer system. Water inlets for bathtubs shall be located above the overflow rim of these facilities. 5) Door locks and security. All exterior doors of dwelling shall be equipped with functional locking devices. Multiple family dwellings shall be furnished with door locks as fellows: a. For the purpose of providing a reasonable amount of safety and general welfare for persons occupying multi - ple family dwellings, an approved security system shall be maintained for each multiple family building to con - trol access. The security system shall consist of locked building entrance or foyer doors, and locked doors lead- ing from hallways into individual dwelling units. Dead- latch type door locks shall be provided with lever knobs or door knobs) on the inside of the building entrance doors and with key .cylinders .on the outside of the build - ing entrance doors. Building entrance door latches shall be of a type that are permanently locked from the out- side and permanently unlocked from the inside. b. Every door that is designed to provide ingress or egress for a dwelling unit within a multiple family building shall be equipped with an approved lock that is a dead -. locking bolt that cannot be retracted by end pressure; provided, however, that such door shall be openahle from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. f) Removal of basic equipment or facilities. No owner, opera- tor or occupant shall cause any facility or equipment, which is required under this ordinance, to be removed from or shut off from any occupied dwelling unit, except for such tempo- rary interruptions as may be necessary while actual repairs or alterations are in progress, or during temporary emergencies. 7) Connection to water and sewer system. Every kitchen sink, lavatory basin, bathtub or shower and water closet required under the provisions of this section shall be properly con- 520 25 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS 9 -100 nected to a public water and sewer system or to an approved private water and sewer system and shall be supplied with _ hot and cold running water. 8) Water heating facilities. Every dwelling shall have supplied water heating facilities which are installed in an approved manner, properly maintained, properly connected with hot water lines, and .which are capable of heating and delivering water to such a temperature as to permit an adequate amount of water to be drawn at every required kitchen sink, lavatory basin, bathtub, shower and laundry facilities or other similar units at a temperature of not less than one hundred twenty 120) degrees Fahrenheit. 9) Heating facilities. Every dwelling shall have heating facili - ties. The. owner of said heating facilities shall be required to see that said heating facilities are properly installed, safely maintained, and in good working condition. Said facilities shall be capable of safely and adequately heating all habit- able rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms located therein, to a temperature consistent with state and federal guidelines at three (3) feet above the floor at all times when occupied. 10) Operation of heating facility and incinerator. Every heating or water heating facility and incinerator must be installed and must operate in accordance with the requirements of the building code. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.090,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -100. Installations and maintenance. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall meet the following requirements: 1) Plumbing fixtures. Every waterline, plumbing fixture and drain shall be properly installed, connected and maintained in working order, and must be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects and capable of performing the function for which it was designed. All repairs and installations must be made in accordance with the provisions of the building code. 2) Plumbing systems. Every stack, waste and sewer line shall be so installed and maintained as to function properly and be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects to prevent 521 26 9 -100 MAPLEWOOD CODE structural deterioration or a health hazard. All repairs and installations must be made in accordance with the provisions of the building code. 3) Heating equipment. Every space heating, cooking and water heating device located in a dwelling shall be properly in- stalled, connected, maintained and capable of performing the function for which it was designed in accordance with the provisions of the building code. 4) Electrical service, outlets, fixtures. All dwelling units shall be supplied with electrical service that is adequate to safely meet the electrical needs of the structure in accordance with the provisions of the building code. Every electrical outlet and fixture shall be installed, maintained and connected to the source of electrical power, in accordance with the provi- sions of the building code. 5) All facilities and equipment. All required equipment and all building space and parts in every dwelling shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the building code. All housing facilities shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition so as not to breed insects and rodents or produce dangerous or offensive gases or odors. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.100, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 8 -101. Light and ventilation. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall meet the following requirements: , t..- 1) Natural light in dwellings, Ever dwelling unit shall have atYg C ;1 least one window of approved size facing directly to the outdoors or to a court; provided that, if connected to a room Lk or area used seasonably (e.g. porch), then adequate daylight must be possible through this interconnection. 2 Light in nonhabitable work space. In multiple dwellings, every furnace room, and all similar nonhabitable work space shall have one supplied electric light fixture available at all times. 3) Light in public halls and stairways. Every public hall and inside stairway shall be lighted at all times with an illumina- 522 27 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS 9 -102 tion of at least five (5) lumens per square foot in the darkest portion of the normally traveled stairs and passageways. 4) Electric. outlets required. All dwellings shall have an ade- quate number of electrical outlets and electrical lighting fix - tures for normal usage, subject to the approval of the electri- cal inspector. 5) Adequate ventilation. Every dwelling shall have at least one window which can be easily opened or such other device as will adequately ventilate the dwelling. 6) ventilation and light in bathroom and water closet com- partment. Every bathroom and water closet .compartment shall have at least one window for light and ventilation, except that no window shall be required in bathrooms or water closet compartments equipped with an approved ven- tilation system. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.110,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -142. Minimum standards for safety from fire. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall comply with the applicable provisions of the fire prevention ordinances of the city and the following additional standards for safety from fire: 1) Exclusion of residence building from storing flammable liq- uid. No dwelling shall be located within a building contain- ing any business handling, dispensing or storing flammable liquids with a flash point of one hundred (100) degrees Fahr- enheit, as defined by the 1976 Edition of the NFPA Life Safety Code #101. 2) Exits. All exit requirements of the building code shall be complied with. 3) Cooking and heating equipment. All cooking and heating + equipment, components and accessories, in every heating, cooking and water heating device shall be maintained free from leaks and obstructions, be properly vented and kept functioning properly so as to be free from fire, health and accident hazards. All installations and repairs shall be made in accordance with the regulations of the building code. 523 28 9-102 MAPLEWOOD CODE 4) Smoke alarms. Approved U.L. smoke alarms,. which are func- tional and in good working order, shall be provided in all dwellings, where required by state law. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.120, 6 -5 -80) Cross reference- --Fire prevention and protection, Ch. 12. Sec. 9 -103. Responsibilities relating to the maintenance of dwelling units. All properties in the city under this article., and the owners or occupants thereof, shall comply with the following requirements: 1) Maintenance of private areas. Every occupant of a dwelling shall keep in a clean and sanitary condition, that part of the dwelling and premises thereof, which he occupies, controls or uses. 2) Maintenance of shared or public areas. Every owner of a dwelling, containing two (2) or more dwelling units, shall maintain in a clean and sanitary condition the shared or public areas of the dwelling and premises thereof. 3) Disposal of garbage and refuse. Every occupant of a dwell- ing shall dispose of all his rubbish in a clean and sanitary manner consistent with chapter 16 of this Code. 4) Use and operation of supplied plumbing fixtures. Every occupant of a dwelling shall keep the supplied plumbing fixtures therein clean and sanitary.and shall be responsible for the exercise of reasonable care in their proper use and operation. 5) Installation and care of plumbing fixtures furnished by occupant. Every plumbing fixture furnished by the occupant shall be properly. installed; maintained in goad working; con - dition; clean and sanitary; and, free from defects, leaks or obstructions. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.130, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -104. Rooming houses. No person in the city shall operate a rooming house or shall occupy or let to another for occupancy any rooming unit in any rooming house, except in compliance with the provisions of this section: 524 29 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS 9 -104 1) Water closet, hand lavatory and bath facilities. At least one water closet, lavatory basin and bathtub or shower, properly connected to an approved water and sewer system and in good working condition, shall be supplied for each four (4) rooms within a rooming house wherever said facilities are shared. All such facilities shall be located within the resi- dence building served and be directly accessible from a com- mon hall or passageway to all persons sharing such facilities. Every lavatory basin and bathtub or shower shall be sup- plied with hot and cold water at all times. 2) Minimum floor area for sleeping purposes. Every room oc- cupied for sleeping purposes by one person shall contain at least seventy (70) square feet of floor area. Every room occu- pied for sleeping purposes by two (2) or more persons shall contain at least fifty (50) square feet of floor area for each occupant t.h.ereof. 3) .fed linen and towels. The operator of every rooming house shall change supplied bed linen and towels therein at least once a week and prior to the letting of any room to another occupant. The operator shall be responsible for the mainte- nance of all supplied bedding in a clean and sanitary manner. 4) Shades, drapes, etc. Every window of every rooming unit shall be supplied with shades, draw drapes or other devices or materials which, when properly used, will afford privacy to the occupant of the rooming unit. 5) The operator of every rooming house shall be responsible for the sanitary maintenance of all walls, floors and ceilings, and for the sanitary maintenance of every other part of the room- ing house; and he shall be further responsible for the sanitary maintenance of the entire premises, where the entire struc- ture of building within which the rooming house is contained is leased or occupied by the operator. 6) Every water closet, flush urinal, lavatory basin and bathtub or shower shall meet the design standards of section 9 -99 of this article and shall be located within a room or rooms which: a. Afford privacy and are separate from the habitable rooms. 525 9 -104 MAPLEWOOD CODE b. Are accessible front. a common hall and without going outside the rooming house. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.1.40, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -105.. Vacant and unfit dwellings. . The owner of any dwelling in the city, which has been declared unfit for human habitation, or which is otherwise vacant for a pe- riod of sixty (60) days or more, shall make same safe and secure so that it is not. hazardous to the health, safety and welfare of the public and does not constitute a public nuisance. Any vacant dwell - ing open at doors or windows, if unguarded, shall be deemed to be. a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public and a public nuisance within the meaning of this article. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.150, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -106. Hazardous buildings. In the event that.a dwelling in the city under this article has been declared unfit for human habitation and the owner has not reme- died the defects within a. prescribed reasonable time, the dwelling may be declared a hazardous building and treated consistent with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.1601 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -107. Enforcement officer. It shall be the duty of the environmental health official and his authorized representatives to enforce the provisions of this article. Authorized representatives shall include the building inspectors, the director of public safety or his representatives, or the health officer. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.170, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -108 -. Inspections. ' The enforcement officer shall be authorized to make or cause to be made inspections to determine the condition of dwellings and premises in the city under this article in order to safeguard the 1 health, safety and welfare of the public. The enforcing officer, or his designated representatives, shall be authorized to enter any dwell- i '-- ing or premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of perform- ing his duties under this article. If the owner, operator or person in 526 31 BUILDINGS , ND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -110 possession of the dwelling shall refuse to consent to the inspection and there is probable cause to believe that a violation exists within the particular structure, a search warrant may be obtained. (Ord. No. 486 § 214.1809 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -109. Access by owner or operator. Every occupant of a dwelling in the city un(ler this article! Shall give the owner or operator thereof, or his agent or employee, access to any part of such dwelling unit, rooming unit or its premises, at reasonable times, for the purpose of affecting inspection and main- tenance, making such repairs, or making such alterations as are necessary to comply with the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.19016-5-80) Sec. 9- 110. Compliance orders. Whenever the enforcement officer determines that. any dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit in the city under this article, or the premises surrounding any of these, fails to meet the provisions of this article, he may issue a compliance order setting forth the viola- tions of the article and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violations. This compliance order shall: 1) Be in writing. 2) Describe the location and nature of the violations of this article. 3) Establish a time for the correction of such violation and notify of appeal. recourse. 4) Be served upon the owner, his agent or the occupant, as the case may require. Such notice shall be deemed to be properly served upon such owner, agent or upon any such occupant, if a copy thereof is: a. Served upon him personally, or b. Sent by registered or certified mail to his last known address, or c. Upon failure to effect notice through a. or b. above, as set out in this section, posted at a conspicuous place in or about the dwelling which is affected by the notice. Ord. No. 486, § 214.200,6-5-80) 527 l 32 0 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 9 -111. Variances. Appeals of interpretation or variance under this article shall be made to the city manager. If not satisfied, further appeal may be made to the board of adjustments and appeals according to estab- lished city procedures. The board will hear requests for variance and interpretation .of this article. The board may grant va riances in instances where the strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under, consideration, and when it is demonstrated that such action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent.of this article. (Ord. No. 486, g 214.2109 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -112. Violations. Any person, firm or corporation failing to comply with the provi- sions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and subject to prosecution. (Ord., No. 486, § 214.211, 6 -5 -80) Secs. 9- 113 -9 -129. Reserved, 33 St. Paul Truth -In -Sale of Housing Disclosure Report Carctully rcaa this encuc report) Page - of - Notice: A copy of this Report must be publicly displayed at the premises when the house is shown to prospective buyers, andacopyofthisReportmustbeprovidedtothebuyerpriortothetimeofsigningaPurchaseAgreement. THIS REPORT IS NOT A WARRANTY, BY THE -CITY OF ST. PAUL OR EVALUATOR OF THE FUTUREUSEFULLIFE, OR THE FUTURE CONDITION OF ANY BUILDING COMPONENT OR FIXTURE. Address of Evaluated Dwelling: Owner's Name: Listing Agent and Agency: MO, Type of Dwelling: Single Family Duplex Townhouse 0 Comments: \C, . o 0 This report is NOT VALID unless the following eclaration is signed on the ' 8 gn a ongtnal copy submitted to the buyer. HOMEOWNER/AGENT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: I, THE OWNER OR AGENT OF THE OWNER, DECLARE THAT AS OF TMS DATE, THERE ARE'. R E N OT,_._. CODEVIOLATIONORDERSPENDINGONTHISPROPERTYFROMTHEDIVISIONOFPUBLICHEALTHHOUSINGCODEENFORCEMENTOROTHERST. PAUL CITY AGENCIES. a n I FURTHER DECLARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE FOLLAN ON REGARDING ANY FLOOD DAMAGE, SEWER BACK -UP OR WATER SEEP E A THIS 111 . TY tsyNJA) Signature of the - ' - .. ` u ' 8 .Iaer-or Owners Age t Date This Report: I. is intended to provide basic information to the home bu er and seller 'or to c ' • Y prior the time of sale. Minimum standards for this report are ascontainedintheSaintPaulHousingMaintenanceCode (Chapter 34). This report WILL NOT be used to enforce the uiremerqnts of theHousingMaintenanceCode, however, this evaluation form will be used by the Fire Department to determine if there is icompliancewithth therequirementsforahard -wired smoke detector in single farruly residences. 2. is not warranty, by the City of St. Paul, of the condition of the building r an build' • 8 Y mg component, nor of the accuracy of this report. 3. covers only the items listed on the form and only hose items visible at the timeY of the evaluation. The Evaluator is not required to ignite theheatingplant, use a ladder to observe the condition of the roofing, disassemble items or evaluate inaccessible areas. d. The lender, FHA or VA may have different standards. S, is valid for one year from the date of issue and only or the owner namedY on this report. 6. Questions regarding this report should be directed to the evaluator. 7. Complaints regarding this report should be directed to the Division of Public Health ' Truth - n - Sale of Housing, 553 Cedar Strret, St. Paul, MN 55 101, Phone No. 298A I S3. EVALUATOR: DATE: 34 Attachment 5 Rev 9/89 teeny Addrus: •, otM Meets minimum u iCS with . p •tM minimum oussng u rcments. B Below minimum acquirements • the item is below minhum Housin Code uirem8nq u ts. C" = Comments - the item cannot be adequately evaluated or it has scxnc deficiency, • insufficient y, twt the def ciency istomaketheitembelowminimumrequirtments. lH" = Hazardous - the item in its present condition may endan etyg the health and safety of the occupant. Y" = Yes N « No « NB , "C" Any 1tem marked of "H" must have a written comment about the item. Additional comment sheets may be attached if needed. Item # Comments BASEMENT /CELLAR 1. Stairs and Handrails ........................... 2. Basement/cellar floor . ................... . 3. Foundation ....................... 4. Evidence of dampness r ...... .. . o stainingng _... 5. First floor,. floor system ................... .. . 6. Beams and columns , ............... . ELECTRICAL SERVICE(S) # of Services 7. Service size: Amps: 30 60 100 150 Other Vol ts: 115 115/230 8. Electrical service installation/grounding ... . 9. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures . . . PLUMBING SYSTEM 10. Floor drain(s) .......................... ...... 11. Waste and vent piping 12. Water piping 13. Gas piping .................................... 14. Water heater(s) installation ... ....... . ...... . 1 S. Water heater(s) venting ..................... 16. Plumbing fixtures ........... ................ . HEATING SYSTEM 17. Heating plant(s): Fuel: Type: a. Installation, and visible condition b. Viewed in operation .......................... c. Combustion venting The Evaluator is not required to ignite the beating plant(s). 18. Additional heating unit(s) Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition ........... . . b. Viewed in operation ...................... . c. Combustion venting KITCHEN 19. Walls and ceiling ........................... 20. Floor condition and ........ . ceding height ... 21. Evidence of dampness or staining ........ . 22. Electrical outlets and fixtures .............. 23. Plumbing fixtures 24. Water flow ................................ 25. Window size and operable area ........... 26. Window condition ........................ 27. Additional Comnts EVALUATOR: 35 DATE: Page .____. of _____ Rev 9189 th•In -dale of Housing Disclosure', Report carefully read this entire report) Page _ of publicly displayed at the premises when the house is shown to prospective buyers, andtothebuyerpriortothetimeofsigningaPurchaseAgreement. v'TY, BY THE CITY OF ST. PAUL OR EVALUATOR OF THE FUTURE COIVDTTION OF ANY BUILDING COMPONENT OR FIXTURE. icing: L amity Duplex Townhouse ' C)\ o , following declaration is signed on the original copy submitted to the buyer. LIRE STATEMENTi NER, DECLARE THAT AS OF TMS DATE, THERE ARE ARE NOT. -. CODESPROPERTYFROMTHEDIVISIONOFPUBLICHEALTH, HOUSING CODE. CITY AGENCIES. F MY KNOWLEDGE, THE FOLLO rl ON REGARDING ANY FLOODRSEEATFflSP u, ant rr o the home buyer and seller prior to the time of sale. Minimum standards for this report are asienanccCode (Chapter 34). This re P port WILL NOT be used to enforce the requirements of theLsevaluationformwillbeusedbytheFireDepartmentto ' determine if there is con liance with theforinsinglefamilyresidences. p the condition of the building or an buildin eon • Y g component, nor of the accuracy of this report. and only those items visible at the time of the evaluation. ne Evaluator is not u' ' req 2red to ignite the condition of the roofing, disassemble items or. evaluate inaccessible areas. rnt standards. c and only for the owner named on this report. directed to the evaluator. x directed to the Division of Public Health, Truth - in - Sale of Housing, 5 Cedarcdar Str cct53.g , DATE: 36 Rev 9/89 0 IQ rropeny AWMSS: j%_2 AkJ .0 ryv- kAU_ij4 _3 kJ6-k k-., M " s Mots minimum u - o m acs wi « .. _ F t ht , cm in m um ous ng uUrements. 8 Below min" requirements - tk item is below minimum Housing Code u' C" g rrcq uem en ts. C = Comments - I the item cannot be adequately evaluated or it has some deficiene • insufficient to make y, but the deficiency s the item below minimum requirements. H" = Hazardous - the item in its presm t condition may endangerYg he health and safety of the occupant. Yes N .. No Any item marked "B ", "C" or "H" must have a written comment about the. item. Additional comment sheets may be attached if needed. Item # Comments BASEMENT /CELLAR 1. Stairs and Handrails ............. ...:... . 2. Basement/cellar floor ............. . 3. Foundation ................... ........... 4. Evidence of dampness or staining . S. First floor, floor system ............... . 6. Beams and columns ..... i .................... ELECTRICAL SERVICE(S) # of Services 7. Service size: Amps: 30 60 100 150 - Other,_____ Volts: 115 115/230 8. Electrical service installation/groundin S . ...... 9. Electrical wro.. ng, outlets and fixtures ......... PLUMBING SYSTEM 10. Floor drain(s) . ............................... . 116 Waste and vent piping ............... ... . 12. Water piping . 13. Gas piping . 14. Water h eaters) installation .................. . 15. Water heater(s) venting ..................... 16. Plumbing fixtures ...................... .... . HEATING SYSTEM 17. Heati • ng plant(s): Fuel: Type; a. Installation and visible condition ............ b. Viewed in ' operation .......................... C. Combustion venting .......................... The- Evaluator is not required to ignite the h g eating plants) 18. Additional heating unit(s) Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition .............. b. Viewed in operation ......... . ............... . C. ' Combustion venting .......................... KITCHEN 19. Walls and ceiling ............................ 20 Floor condition and ...... . ceiling height _ 21. Evidence of dampness or staining ........ . 22. Electrical outlets and fixtures ............. 23. Plumbing fixtures ......................... 24. Water flow . ............................... 25. Window size and openable area ............ 26. Window condition ........................ 27. Additional Comments ................... EVALUATOR: 37 DATE: Ala Page - of _____ Rev 9/89 h-opcity Addreu: r t M" = Meets tninimm roquircmenu "B" = Below mumimum uirements C Comments "H" = HuWdous "Y" = Yu "NN= No Item # Comments. LI'VTNG AND DINING ROOM {S) 28. Walls and ceiling .......................... 29. Floor condition and ceiling height ......... 30. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 31. Electrical outlets and fixtures . ...... . 32. Window size and openable area ........... 33. Window condition ................ . HALLWAYS, STAIRS AND ENTRIES X. Walls, ceilings and floors .................. 35. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 36. Stairs and handrails to upper floors ....... 37,. Electrical outlets and fixtures ............. 38. 'Window condition ........................ 39. Smoke detector(s) ......................... . Properly located ............................ ..._ Hard -wired . . .............................. . BATHROOM (S) # of: Full Partial 40. Nulls and ceiling ......................... 41. Floor condition .......... ................ . 42. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 43. Electrical outlets and fixtures .............. 44. Plumbing fixtures .......................... 45. , Water flow . .......................... .. . 46. Window size and openable area or mechanical exhaust ....... ............... . 47. Condition of windows or mechanical exhaust................................... SLEEPING ROOM (S) No. of: 48. Walls and ceiling height .................. .._ 49. Floor condition, area, and ceiling height . . 50. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 51. Electrical outlets and fixtures ............. 52. Window size and openable area ........... 53. Window condition ........ . condition .. ...... . ENCLOSED PORCHES AND OTHER ROOMS Evaluator shall identify each additional room separately and comment when necessary.) 54. Walls, floor condition and ceiling height.. 55. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 56. Electrical outlets and fixtures ........ . 57. Window condition . ........................ . ATTIC SPACE (Visible Areas) 58. Roof boards and rafters ................... 59. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 60. Electrical wiring/outletVfixtures ........... 61. Ventilation . ............................... 62. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ...•....... EVALUATOR: cof 4 PVo DATE: Rev 9/89 Pr oM.y Addmss: M" = mecu minimum MqubTments Below Minimum fcquuements C" = Comment *H"= Hazadous • "Y" = Yes "N-= No Item # nu_ EXTERIOR (Visible Areas) Comme 63. Foundation ..........................1 64. Basement/cel.lar windows ............. 65. Drainage (grade) . .. ................... . 66. Esc to ri or walls 67 Doors (frames/stornslsc.reens) 68.. Windows. (frames/stonms/screens) 69. Open porches, stairways and decks 70. Cornice and trim ...................... 71. Roof covering and flashing .... . 72. Gutters and downspouts .. • .......... . 73. Chimneys ................ / 74. Electrical outlets, fixtures and service / entrance .............................. GARAGE 5. Roof structure and covering .......... . Wall structure and covering ........... 7 Slab condition ...................... . 7 . Garage doors ...... _ .............. . Electrical wiring, ouflets and fixtures ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ...... Important Notice 1. Any single family residence in St. Paul must have at least one smoke detector connected to the electrical system. The detector must be located car sleeping rooms. Far mote information call Fire Prevention, 228 -6230 2. All raiMcadcrs connected to the sanitary sewer system must be disconnected. For more information. call Public Works, Sewer Division; 298 -5421. 34, Any house built before 1950 may have. lead paint or4 in it. If children eat lead paint, they can be poisoned. For more information call Division of blic Health, 292 -7746 C City of SL Paul or the Evaluator are not responsible for the determination of the presence of airborne ' po pre rborn panicles such as asbestos, noxious gases. uch as radon or other conditions of air quality that may be present, nor the conditions which may cause the above. S. If this building Is used far any purpose other than a single family dwelling, it may be Illegally toned. To. help you determine legal uses under the toning ordinance, contact the Zoning Administrator at 9g2 8 -4584. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE NOT MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ST. PAUL] HOUSING. THEIR. INCLUSION ON THIS FORM IS ONLY TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO THE BUYER. NO DETERMINATION IS MADE WHETHER THE ITEMS MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ENERGY INFORMATION Type of Insulation Approx. NV INSULATION Inches NA 81. Attic Insulation ........................ 82. Wall Insulation ........................ 83. Kneewall Insulation ............ ..... 84. Rim Joist Insulation .................. 85. Storm Doors .................. ....... . . NV Not Visible 86. Storm Windows .... ......... NA Not Applicable WEATHERSTRIPPING 87. Doors .. ............................... 88. Windows .............................. FIR E P L A C EIW OOD ST O VES 89. Dampers installed in fireplaces 90. Installation ............................ 91. Condition ....... ... ................... I hereby certify that the above report is made in compliance with the St. Paul Housin g PCode, Chapter 34 and that I have utilized the care and diligence, reasonable and ordinary, for meeting the certification standards prescribed by theTruth - In -Sale of Housing Ordinance, Chapter. 189. I have found no instance of non - compliance with the items listed above as of the date of Phis report, except.those designated herein. Page of Evaluator Signature 39 Phone Number Date Rev 9/89 MINUTES OF THE TRUTH- IN- HOUSING'FORUM Special Meeting of the Maplewood HRA) Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 SEPTEMBER 51 1989 1 CALL TO OR ER Chairman Fi Cher c rlled the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. 20 ATTENDANCE HRA Commis i7geoass: Lorraine Fischer, Dale Carlson City Staff. 4f Olson, Ken Roberts 30 DISCUSSION A. Geoff Olson presented the staff report regarding a truth -in- housing ordinance and discussed the variety of ordinances in effect in the metropolitan area. Representatives from realtors associations and various realty firms presented statements. In general they expressed their firm support for the concept of truth- in- housing ordinances requiring disclosure and their opposition to mandatory code compliance. Keith Holm, Executive Vice President of St. Paul Area Realtors Association, 325 East Roselawn Avenue, Maplewood, said his organization does not support truth - in- housing. disclosure if it is attached to code compliance. Mr. Holm discussed the cost and liability problems. to real estate agents when attaching code compliance to this proposed ordinance Karen Christopherson, Government Affairs Director for State of Minnesota Board of Realtors, said that approximately 500 of housing stock in Maplewood is over thirty .years old and would have code deficiencies. The manager of Merrill Lynch Realty in Woodbury said he is against this ordinance because of code compliance which he feels will affect buying power and home. prices. Jack Larson, Manager of Edina Realty in Maplewood, said he is concerned with the ordinance if it includes code compliance. Mr. Larson said escrow may be a problem with lenders, since lenders want all escrow fixed before closing. Mr. Larson is in favor of truth -in- 2- housing with disclosure. Mr. Larson also mentioned the. consistency consideration since all inspectors are not equal Dan Niezgocki, a Maplewood resident and a truth -in- housing evaluator licensed in St. Paul, So, St. Paul, and Minneapolis, said he is in favor of the truth -in- housing disclosure but he is against code compliance. Mr. Niezgoc.ki said he is concerned with inspectors being able to obtain insurance if this ordinance is approved with code compliance. In response to a question from a commissioner, Mr. Niezgocki said there are some controls in place to reprimand inspectors who are not performing their inspection duties as required.. Steve Jelinek, a licensed building inspector and real estate broker, said code compliance would be based on the housing maintenance code, not the much larger uniform building code. Commissioner Fischer stated there appeared to be some misunderstanding among those present regarding what compliance would be necessary. The ordinance as proposed did not refer to Uniform Building Code compliance but to the City's housing maintenance code compliance, much of which would be addressed by normal realty practices, yard maintenance, etc.. After further explanations and questions about what would be entailed,.it began to appear the remaining areas of major concern would be exterior siding. Commissioners Fischer and Carlson stated they did not recall any provisions for compliance at the discussion of the last meeting, which was reflected by the minutes. Karen Christopherson suggested the realtors meet with staff before the next HRA meeting to further discuss this proposed ordinance. Ms. Christopherson said she would contact Geoff Olson to schedule this meeting. 4o INTERVIE FOR HRA PPLICANT Commission s F' cher and Carlson interviewed Stephen Jelinek, an ap icant for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 5, ADJOURNMENT HRA Chair an Fis Sher adjourned the meeting at 9:35 p.m. MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ` OCTOBER 10, 1989 10 CALL TO ORDER Chairman ischer cal d the meeting to order at 7:05 p.M. 29 ROLL CALL HRA Commissio a S. Lorraine Fischer, Dale Carlson, Tom Co ell City Staf Geoff elson, Ken Roberts 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Truth -in- Housing Ordinance Geoff Olson presented the staff report concerning the adoption of a truth -in- housing ordinance. Dan Niezgocki, a Maplewood resident and a truth -in housing evaluator, asked if this ordinance would apply to residential single - family homes only. Geoff Olson said this proposed ordinance would apply to all residential properties. Karen Christopherson of.the Minnesota Board of Realtors. acknowledged Geoff Olson for his tie and efforts in his prior meeting with a number of the realty members.. Commissioner Dale Carlson moved the Maplewood rousing and Redevelopment Authority: 10 Adopt the truth -in -sale of housing ordinance and reevaluate it after it has been in effect for one. year 2. Adopt the resolution establishing a 15 filing: fee for each report. Commissioner Tom Connelky seconded Ayes -- -all 3. APPROVAL OF XI TES A. November 15, 19 8 Commissione Ca lson moved approval of the minutes of November , 1.98 as submitted. HRA Minutes 10 -10 -89 4- Commissioner Connelly seconded Ayes- -all Da Per Diem for Board Members Afte discussion by the commi inners, the consensus of the c ission was to have a annual dinner with the: other mmissions and City ouncil. 80 Interviews for\New Commission,Aembers Ken Roberts info Ned he co issioners that Steve Jelinek has withdrawn hi for appointment to the HRA.and, also, that he was unabcon act Evan Coobs and does not know if Mr. Coobs is a andidate for appointment. Commissioner Fischer s 'd she was contacted by a housing inspector who asked i t e HRA would be interested in, a tour demonstrating the d ies f a housing inspector. The truth- in -hous g ordina ce, as it appl.i.es to mobile homes, was discus ed . Ken R erts said .e would investigate which jurisdicti n will handl the mobile home area regarding the p oposed truth -i n housing ordinance. Gary Pearson d Larry Whitcomb w re interviewed as possible HRA commissi members. Commi s s ione Connelly moved. the HRA commend to the City Council the appointment of Gary Pears and harry Whitcomb to the HRA to fill the two existing va 4ncies. Commissioner Carlson seconded Ayes- -all 69 U.nf inished Business A. Truth- in- H(ous:,ng Ordinance At this time the comma- .scion :re:ltroduced the proposed truth -in-housing ordinance and discussed the possibility of including the owner's disclosure of private covenants. Commissioner Carlson moved the inclusion on page 7 of the roposed truth -in- housing ordinance of Item (b) (2) P ' f. Disclosure of any private covenants that run with the property. Commissioner Connelly seconded Ayes - -all INTRODUCTION p Steve Lammlein, 1308 Cope Avenue, and Anna Roberts, 1332 Cope Avenue, have submitted appeals of the Community Design Review Board's September 26, 1989 approval of the plans for English Place at the southeast corner of English Street and Highway 36. Specific reasons for their appeals were not given, but they felt that the City Council should have an opportunity to review this proposal since this project would have an impact on their property. (Refer to the letters on pages 5 and 6.) BACKGROUND On December 22, 1988, the City Council granted a CUP for this use. On October 25, 1988, the Community Design Review Board approved the design plans as submitted by Marcor Properties, Inc. the original applicant. On September 26, 1989, the Review Board approved the plans for this project subject to 27 conditions. (See pages 7-10.) ORDINANCE PROVISION Subsection 25 -65 (b) provides that the Review Board's decision shall be final, unless appealed to the City Council by the applicant, City Staff or any affected person within ten days after the Board's decision. DISCUSSION Since the neighbors appealing the board's decision have not yet stated their reasons, we cannot make a recommendation at this time . TEENGLISH2 Attachments 1. Location Map 2, Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Letter of appeal from Steve Lammlein dated October 6, 1989 50 Letter of appeal from Anna Roberts dated October 6,,1989 6, Design Review Board motion dated September 26, 1989 7. Plans date stamped September 20, 1989 (separate attachment) p i V © ` D o In urchan U rct n I F, Y 34 _ _ Ajio Del- r irni t L g C ART j _ _ . If x ion 1 0 os 1 m 1 n r R r 1 o r i n o at tA i N 33 a q Y4? rjq-'7a L 41 1A pal r X521 ° z 1 LLJJ AV E. s o I ) R1 t E' ' l 1 l i " I V' O I• 111r N o o t r I• a t L• AV E. s o I ) R1 t E' ' l 1 l i " r • r J a i T•I} . r 1 t ,j . pp AL all j1fl—*;-J L-L! AD o'CI LL rL f r a t • \ A Jt ; .. --- ^.. ate."."_ -• . 1 _ SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 41:7 0-7Z Ob i oo ••.,tom Jr11 S) •• 0.q,1 j", St E 1 I h a.• Lj IF iT•,ec^s'7rTS- '+- _'1C" ^..' . .ir•+-- •te r•w.r ,,..- ' SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 i i 5 Attachment 4 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 I. CALL T ORDER t Chairman oe called the meeting to rder at 7 p.m. II.. ROLL CALL Donald Moe. Pre s e Tom Deans Abse t Marvin Erickson Pre ent Roger Anitzberge Pr sent Michael Molder P esent Daniel Molin resent III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. The minutes of S tember 12, 1989, were amended correcting the of on Item E..Landscaping /Screening Appeal - Carve Gen ral Repair to Ayes - -4 Nays - -2. Boardmember rickson oved approval of the amended minutes of eptember 1 , 19890 Boardmemb Anitzberger econded Ayes- -all IV. APPROVAL OF A ENDA Secretary E strand moved the agen a be amended to cancel Item 6. B. Sign Plan Revision - A T & T at the St. Paul Business ,C nter East on I -35E at th applicant's request. Boardmem er Anitzberger moved approval of the agenda as amended. Boardm tuber Holder seconded V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Architectural, Site and Landscape Plan Revisions -- English Place, Southeast Corner. of Highway 36 and English Street Dick Erntz of A & E Properties of Stillwater, Inc. said he had met with the neighbors and discussed this proposed center. Mr. Erntz said the neighbors are concerned with the removal of trees from the rear of the proposed building, therefore., he is proposing that as many existing trees be preserved as possible. Mr. Erntz said the neighbors are concerned with traffic noise, and he said there are considerable existing trees between his property and.the highway 7 Attachment 6 Community Design Review Board --2- Minutes 9- 2.6-89 right -of -way and these trees would remain to buffer the traffic noise. Mr. Erntz said the pump island would be moved closer to the building and they have done a realignment of the driveway and propose dense landscaping to prevent the headlights from shining onto the neighbors homes. Chairman Moe asked for comments from the public. Secretary Ekstrand read a letter submitted to him from Steve Lamml ien stating his concerns. Mr. Lamml ien' s concerns were that the driveway grade for Cope Avenue be such that headlights do not shine toward homes; grade elevation be as low as.possible and that a designated grade elevation with no changes be required; two rows of staggered trees along Cope Avenue; more specific landscape plan; more attractive building materials be used as in Marcor plan; if building will be phased, the later phase should be subject to neighbors' comments and.to Review Board approval; Review Board approval be subject to agreement with the applicant in writing, all plans must be approved by the Review Board. Anna Roberts, 1332 Cope Avenue, asked that this development have uniform signs, commented on fencing requirements and commented on the location of driveway. Ms. Roberts asked that the materials be maintenance - free to assure that this development is maintained. Jim Grealish, 1326 Cope Avenue, said he di d not want toi 3 k see this project started.but stopped later because of problems with it. Ted Kopel, 1336 Cope Avenue, said he is concerned that traffic will become a problem on Cope Avenue and, asked if general traffic could be discouraged from using Cope Avenue. Mr. Erntz said he would install speed bumps if the Board requires them. Mr. Erntz also said he would match building roof colors for roof vents as much as possible. Boardmember Anitzberger moved approval of plans date - stamped September 21, 1989, for English Place, a multi - tenant commercial center, subject to the following conditions: 8 3 - Approval of Tans by the Community Design Review 1. P Board does not constitute approval of a budding permit. s shall be stored in screening 2 All trash dumpstei and enclosures Stith a 100% opaque wooden ,gate , be a color and material compatible with the shall rotected b bu..d.ng. Enclosures shall be P y co ncrete- filled steel posts, or the equivalent anchored in the round at the front corners of the g structure. The southerly dumpster, enclosure is allowed since it would be within the 30 -foot not 1 of line* minimum setback from the south n or roof- mounted equipment 30 Any exterior buildi q decoratively screened and hidden f ram shall be dec Y e vertical board screening fences for the view . Th wall mo unted HVAC units shall be at least 80%. and shall be. tall enough to totally hide opaque screens shall be the same the units. These Wooden color as the building. o tan acceptable to the City 4.. An erosion contr 1 p P shall be submitted prior to the issuance Engineer, erosion control during of a building permit for construction* striped in a double- -stripe 5z Parking areas shall be •p , hairpin" ' des i n and all bituminous areas shall g parkin lots have continuous concrete curbing.. g ntinual state of repa ir. shall be kept in a eo begun within two years of 60 If construction has not g approval Board review shall be repeated. lighting shall be provided. 7. Site security g g and Security lighting fixtures on the south y g southeast sides of the building shall n. ot be walls mounted These lig illum inatehtingfixturesmust this back portion of.the site by lightingP s the parking lot and standards erected acros aimed towards the building. All lighting standards on the site shall not exceed 15 feet In height. No source shall be directly visible from any light . • 1 area or public street and light levels residential P t a residential shall not exceed one foot candle a property line property is disturbed or property g . If any adjacent prop Y site irons removed due to construction of the , A Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes 9-26-89 that property.shall be restored and irons replaced by the applicant. i 9. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 10. f - All required landscape areas shall be continually and properly maintained. 11. All required plant materials that die shall be replaced by the owner within one year. 12. The plans shall be revised for staff approval as follows: a. All turning.radii at driveway entrances shall be at least ten feet, The Cope Avenue entrance does not meet this requirement. b. The site shall be graded so that the floor elevation of the structure is as low as is practical for proper drainage and access grades. C* The fuel service area shall be moved as close to the building as practical, while maintaining proper drive lanes, in order to conceal this area as.much as possible from 1308 Cope Avenue. 1340 Ref l ectori z ed stop signs and handicap parking signs shall be provided. 14. All public boulevard that is disturbed due to this construction shall be restored and resodded. 15. Proper building addresses shall be installed, subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal. 16. Signs are not approved through review. A comprehensive sign plan shall be submitted to the Board for approval. 170 Five -foot -wide concrete sidewalks shall. be constructed along both street frontages on the right --of -way next to the lot lines. The English Street sidewalk is not needed north of the entrance drive. The sidewalk must taper to meet the driveway grade at all driveway crossings. The sidewalks shall be extended to the. easterly lot line along Cope Avenue, to the street curb along 10 t Community Design Review Board 5- Minutes 9- 26-89 English Street and to the street curb along Cope Avenue. 18. The building exterior and HVAC screens shall be continually and properly maintained. 19. An inground sprinkling system shall be installed for all landscaped areas. 20. The landscape plan shall be resubmitted ,to the Review Board for approval as follows a. There shall be no trees or shrubs or fencing provided within a 25 -foot sight triangle at both intersections or within the right -of- way; b. The landscaping /screening along the entire Cope Avenue frontage shall be at least six- feet-tall, 8 0 % . opaque upon installation; c. The shrubs proposed along Highway 36 shall be replaced with five Skyline Locust planted 30 feet on center. d. The materials and design of the retaining walls shall be submitted. 21, The applicant shall obtain approval from MnDOT to drain into the state right -of -way. 22* The applicant shall provide the following items , subject to the City Engineer's approval: a. Additional pavement to provide a north -- bound left -turn lane on English Street. The total width of English Street in this area shall be at least 48 feet, b. As part of this widening, the s".gnal system loop detectors must be properly located with lane striping and directional arrows provided. 23. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form acceptable to staff,, in the amount of 150 %.of the estimated cost of any site improvements that are not completed by occupancy. The applicant shall also provide staff with proper documentation, to be approved by the City Attorney, which allows staff access onto the t Community Design Review Board -6- Minutes 9- -26-89 property to finish work that may not be completed 241 Three speed bumps shall be placed on the driveway from Cope Avenue as shown on the "phasing" plan This.driveway shall have a sign at the Cope Avenue curb cut, reading "Service Drive Only".. A "No Exit" sign shall be posted at the north.. end of this drive near the building to discourage exits to Cope Avenue. 25. A three and one -half foot sidewalk shall be installed, along the rear of the building 26. Roof vents shall be a color, to match building roof as much as possible. Roof vents shall be consolidated as near as possible along the common walls to limit the number of vents. 4 27. The "phase I diagonal.driveway" shall be eliminated. Boardmember Holder seconded Boardmember Erickson moved the motion be amended to include .No 28. - Grading.plan subject to staff approval. Boardmember viol in Ayes- -all The motion as amended was voted on. Ayes--all Site Redevelopment - Fleming's Service Center 2271 White Bear Avenue B', Fields, representing the applicant, discussed the rev gd plans with the board members. Mr. Fields disptlay' ,pictures of a new product,-.called brick block, which wotice used on the upper , port .ion o f he building on t p. of the three feet of rock block, which I would be used on "t e bottom,, portion of the building, Mr,, Fields asked thaw they-":., hey be allowed to use a cedar fence material on the of screening to accomplish continuity. with the., enti building . t Mr. Fields asked that consid er: ion be given 'to the hours of ope tion for this propo %al, since it was reviewed i ' advance of the newly,,, rev Ped fuel ordinan ,e and he asked that the re.quireAient for a condi onal use permit be eliminated.'-----.Mr,, fields alsof. ask dr that Condition 22, relating to the- el iimXnaton of t driveway to Lark Avenue, be deleted s ince 'he.,, f e l t 12 TO FROM: AGENDA REPORT City. Manager Assistant City Engineer AGENDA ITEM 1 Action by Counoilli Endorsea..,...... Modif ied.- Rej ected Date SUBJECT: Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87-32--Schedule Public Hearing DATE: October 12 a) 1989 Introduction This is a request to schedule the resumption of the subject public hearings For reference, a copy of the feasibility report originally submitted in April, 1988 is herewith transmitteds Background The August 89 1989 agenda report for this project presented the revised financing requested,when the May 1988 public h ear- i-n-g- was tabled. The August 8, 1989 agenda report requested a public hearing during mid-September, 1989. As explained in the August 22, 1989 agenda report, it was found that a November public hearing date would be more expedient. A date of Thursday, November 30, 1989 was selected. However, the use of either John Glenn or Gladstone School . which is ..required to accommodate the size of the- public hearing, is unavailable +or November 30, 1989, as well as a number of other potential dates The use of John Glenn Middle School for Monday, November 20, 1989 is available. Arrangements have been made with District 622 to reserve John Glenn facilities for November 20,, 1989 beginning at 7 p.m. Recommendation It is recommended that the council set a special meeting on Monday, November 20, 1989 at 7 p.m. to continue the Footprint Lake storm sewer public hearing, A resolution for this purpose is attached. BAI jw Attachment RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING engineer for t h e City Of Map l ewood has WHEREAS, the city eng i n r with ^ef erenc e been authorized and directed to prepare a cart n i sh Street , nt of the area rough l y bounded by to the i mproveme d Ryan Avenue , city Project Ger vai s Avenue, White Bear Avenue, an y 87~32 by Constructt i on of storm sewer, and l has prepared the of oresa i d HEREAB the said citysky end i Weer P ,e p the im rovement herein describe report for P NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY cauNc I L OF MA PLEWOOi MINNESOTA, as follows engineer advising this Council 1, The. report of the city en 9 bounded by improvement of the area roughly that the proposed p e Rear Avenue , and Ryan English Street , 8erva i s Avenue, Whit sewer i s Project 87--34 , by construction of storm se . Avenue, C.ty ro,e ro osed , i s h ere b y received . f eas i b l e and should best be made as p f the f t resa i d improvement i n The council wil 1 confider of ited re ort s and the assessment of ben accordance with the p cost cif the itnprc vement art for al 1 or a port i on of the st of th ep `op y Cha ter 429 , at an estimated Iota co according t o M8A p i m rovement of $1 , 444 , 200 . held at Sohn 81 enn M i dd 1 e A publ is he ring, w.l 1 be a the ount Road 8 , Mapl ewood on Mond y , Bch ©ol at 1 .5b j East. O Y consider sa i d of November , 1x+89 , at ? p . m t o 20th day shat 1 give tnai 1 ed and p b 1 fished rove ent . 'h e c . t y c 1 er u i red b 1 aw . p note. ce of said hearing and improvement as req TD'. FROM BUBJECT MATE AGENDA ITEM L0' AGENDA REPORT Catty Manager Assistant City Engineer Rose l awn Avenue, Arcade Street to Interstate Project 89-03--Schedule Public Hearing October 12, 1989 Introduction Actiono by Cao i:U. Endorsed WWWROOM edifle ed.. ..Z"WAs Rejected Date 5E The feasibility report for the subject project is herewith transmitted. This report summarizes city costs and proposed financing. It is requested that a public hearing be scheduled* Background The proposed street reconstruction is to be done cinder a. cooperative agreement with Ramsey County. A 40 -foot wide bituminous street , with stripped eight --foot wide shoulders and concrete curb and gutters on each side, is recommended. A f i ve- f-Dot wide concrete sidewalk is proposed f or the north side of the street This section is essentially the same as recommended and approved for County Road C from T . H . 61 to Haz el wood . The storm drainage system required for Rosel awn Avenue utilizes the major elements of the Edgerton /Rosel awn Trunk: Storm Sewer,, Project 85-08. The public hearing for. Edgerton /Rose l awn Storm Sewer held on May 2 , 1988 , was tabled i ndef i n i tel y pending a review of alternative financing methods. The Edgerton /Rosel awn Etor'~m Sewer -feasibility report was ordered in March 1985, to eval uate means to prevent flooding at the Edgerton ponds located between Ripley and Rosel awn and to accommodate anticipated reconstruction of Edgerton Street by Ramsey County Since the proposed Rose l awn Avenue improvement includes the Edgerton /Rose l awn Trunk Storm Sewer except for the storm sewer on DeSot o Street south of Dose l awn Avenue, it is recommended that the hearing for Project 85--08 be terminated and consideration of the storm sewer be made part of the public hearing for Rosel awn Avenue, :Project 89--03. The area tributary to the proposed trunk:: sewer on DjeSoto is excluded from the hearing area of the Rosel awn Avenue improvements as shown on the attached map. The Deaoto Street trunk storm sewer would most economically be constructed as part of a future reconstruction of DeSot o Street. Since the Edgerton /Rose l awn Storm Sewer hearing, the council has. i.mpl emented a uniform assessment policy for collector streets and storm sewers Attached is a copy of the summary of assessments Project 89-03 2 October 12 1989 based on the -adopted pol icy of $500 and $1125 per RL or FPM residential. unit for storm sewer and street, respect ivel y Al I other I and uses,, extcept fo r par 1k.. and cemetery, are assessed at 0,,1-0 per square foot and $15 per front +oot. for storm sewer and street .j respect ivel y Due to the minli,mal impervious surf acing in parks and cemeteries,,, a storm. sewer, assessment rate of $0.025 per square foot is warranted. The same rate of $15 per front foot For street is used for park or cemetery a The feasibility report gives the Maplewood share of estimated construction costs for street, storm sewer, and water main Ire I construction costse As noted in the feasibility report, pro# 1 erns have been experienced with the existing sanitary sewer. At this time the television 'inspection of the ex fisting sanitary sewer has n-at been completed so the limits of sanitary sewer reconstruction are not definitively known. However based on the problems experienced by the utility foreman in the maintenance of this I ine, it is a reasonably conservative estimate that most of the segment from Kenwood Drive West to DeSoto Street would r requirereplacement. A peliminary estimate of $1029000 construct cost for sanitary sewer has been developedu The +.ol lowi-ng table gives a summary of local costs and f inancing The engineering and administrative costs include 18 percent of constiruction cost payable to Ramsey County as well as seven percent of construction cost for city staff time. Under the proposed cooperative agreement all easement and right-o+-way acquisition is the responsibility and cost of the city. Compared with the 1988 feasibility report for Edgerton /Rosel awn Trunk Storm- Sewer, the cost for storm sewer and pond ing easement is signi'+icantly reduced. This is due to a revision of the plan, The storm water pump station is currently proposed to be located on Edgerton Street adjacent to the ponds at Ripley Avenue. it would discharge to a shallow gravity storm sewer on the DNR trail that would.convey the water to Round L anti e. In this manner, the cost of acquiring a storm water pond in the Maple Hills Golf Course is eliminated. The shallow gravity sewer on the DNR trail versus the deep out+all previously proposed also saves significant construction costs, The only negative feature of the change of the preliminary design is that should Maple Hills Golf course be developed for high density housing a separate storm sewer pumping station would be necessarys The proposed gravity storm sewer out fall is sized for such a future connections The major factor in reducing the proposed local storm sewer cost 721.,000) compared with that presented in the 1988 Edgerton /Rosel awn Storm Sewer ($1,5959000) is the cost participation of Ramsey County. Previously, it was planned to receive a credit when Ramsey County upgraded Rosel awn or Edgerton Project E39--03 3 October 12, 1989 for part of the cost of providing the storm sewer system and outf al l s Sionce the actual reconstruction of Rosel awn Avenue istobedonewiththestormsewerconstrwucti. on , y ams.ey Count w i l l d ir ectl y share in the costs. - duel etion of the trunk storm sewer 1 ine on DeSoto south, of Rosel awn Avenue al so decreases the 1 ocal cost for Storm sewer. However , the area tributary t o DeSot b Street storm sewer has been deleted from the assessment recovery computations and financing, Pecommendat ion it is, recommended that the publ is hearing for Project £3.5 -0E beterminated . It is recommended that a new ubl, is hearingn for9MoselawryAvenueandassociatedtrunkstormsewerProjectbe schedul ed . Due to the 1 arge size of the assessment area , arrangements have been made f or the use of the Edgerton Elementary School f or Thursday, November 16, 19 39 , beginning at 7 P am = It i.s r%ecommend ed that the attached resolution be adopted, BAI is Attachments w0wI a + II) 2400 No ICY Q) I HEARING AREA PROJECT 89 -83 EDGERTON /R:OSELAWN IMPROVEMENT SA /NT 112\) on P feller LoA 60) i i Va r % %o and e 9o- t II " PA C ROSELAWN AVENUE, ARCADE TO 35E PROJECT 89-03 LOCAL COST AND FINANCING SUMMARY Sanitary Water Storm Sewer Main Item Street* Sewer** Reconst . keconst . Total Construct ion Cost 306,400 4469000 102,000 24,000 8799200 Engineeringing and Adm in i smart i on 76,9600 111,500 25,500 69200 219 , 800 Easement and R . cjht- of -Way 114,000 163,500 Room 1741500 Total Cost 394,000 721,1000 1279500 31,000 1,2739500 Assessment Recovery 138,000 6039000 7419000 Mn /DDT M8A Off System Transfer 256,;000 2569000 General Obligation Financing 118,000 now 118,000 Sanitary Sewer Deprec at i on Fund 127,500 Room 127 9500 Hydrant Fund 319000 31 1000 Total Financing 394,000 721,000 127,500 319000 19273,500 E. xcess width f curb and gutter, walk, and walls. Storm sewer, pond construction, and Round Lake, outf al 1 PAGE I OF 3 D/P NO. 6016 PROJECT NOB .89-03 EDGERTONAOSELAWN IMP PH I (P) PROJECT SUMMARY SEC-17—T-29—R-22700-13 ITEM STORM SEWER (RL—RM) STRM SEW (RH—COMM) STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) STREET (RL—RM) STREET (ALL OTHERS) SEC-17—T-29—R-22-00-1.4 ITEM STORM SEWER (RL—RM) STRM SEW (RH—COMM) STRM SEW (CEMETA RY /PARKS) STREET (RL—RM) STREET (ALL OTHERS) SEC-17—T-29—R-22-0(2-22 ITEM STORM SEWER (RL—RM) STRM SEW (RH—COMM) STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) STREET (RL—RM) STREET (ALL OTHERS) SEC-17—T-29—R-22-00-23 ITEM STORM SEWER (RL—RM) STRM SEW (RH—COMM) STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) STREET (RL—RM) STREET (ALL OTHERS) SEC— 17—T-2%—R-22-00-24 ITEM 49 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY 50.000 000 19 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY 13, 000 87 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY 111939,000 000 Ox@OO 01000 65 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY 259,525,000 4n000 983,620 22 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE 10-04-1989 ASSESSMENT UNITS AT **$500s000 EAU = * *$i5, 000.00 SF AT 0wl00 EAU 0.00 SF AT 0*025 EAU 6,488,13 UNIT AT 17125.000 EAU 117250,00 FF AT 15,000 EAU 0,00 PER RATE ASSESSMENT UNITS AT **$500x@00 EAU — * * *$9, 500.00 SF AT 0a,100 EAU = 0.00 SF AT 0a 0`5 EAU = 6,488,13 UNIT AT 1,125w000 EAU 141625,00 FF AT 15v000 EAU 0,00 PER RATE ASSESSMENT UNITS AT **$500a000 EAU = **$44,000v00 SF AT 0,100 EAU = 1-, 193.90 SF AT OaZ25 EAU = 6,488,13 UNIT AT 1,125w000 EAU = 4,500m00 FF AT 15,000 EAU = 141754,.-50 PER RATE ASSESSMENT UNITS AT **$500m000 EAU = **$48,000,00 SF AT 0al00 EAU 0.00 SF AT Oa0 25 EAU 6,488,13 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EAU = 4,500m00 FF AT 15m000 EAU 141754,.-50 PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER (RL—RM) UNITS. AT 5001s000 EAU 5, 000.00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 9311150,000 SF AT 0,100 EAU 115.00 STRM SEW (CEMETARY /PARKS) 4091972m000 SF AT 0n025 EAR = 101249,,30 STREET (RL—RM) UNIT AT 1,125,000 EAU 11,250m00 STREET (ALL OTHERS) 435,100 FF AT 15,000 EAU 69 526, 50 PAGE 2 OF 3 D/P N0,w 6016 UNITS AT 500s@00 10-04-1989 PROJECT NO. 89-03 EDGERTON/RDSELAWN IMP PH I (P) SF AT 0,100 PROJECT SUMMARY 461231. 80 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) 1000 SF SEC-17—T-29—R-22-09-31 46 PARCELS ASSESSED EAR = 0&00 STREET (RL—RM) J.a 000 ITEM QUANTITY PER 1,125,000 RATE 11125wOO ASSESSMENT 105-a 680 STORM SEWER (RL—RM) UNITS AT 500s000 EAR 241000s00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 1061600.0000 SF AT 0x 100 EAR STRM SEW. (CEMELTARY /PARKS) 18,2,r081,wQl00 SF AT Oo@25 EAR = 41552,03 STREET (RL—RM) UNIT AT 1,125.000 EA. = 91000,00 STREET (ALL OTHERS) 0 FF AT 15s000 EAR SEC— 1 7—T-29—R-22— 0W -32 ITEM 5 PARCELS -ASSESSES} QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER, (RL—RM) I i2's 000 UNITS AT 500s@00 EAR = 61000,00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 4621318-a 000 SF AT 0,100 EAR = 461231. 80 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) 1000 SF AT Oo025 EAR = 0&00 STREET (RL—RM) J.a 000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EAR = 11125wOO STREET (ALL OTHERS) 105-a 680 FF AT 15s000 EAR = 161585,20 SEC-17—T-29 R-22-00-34 ITEM 47 PARCELS ASSESSED 12UANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER (RL—RM) 000 UNITS AT 500,000 EA. = 28,0000100 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 000 SF AT OelOO EAR = 0800 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) 0v 000 SF AT OnO25 EAR 907o,30 STREET (RL—RM) 08000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EAR 111250,00 STREET (ALL OTHERS) 139.000 FF AT 15,000 EAR 2,085,00 SEC-17—T-29—R-22-90-41 ITEM mwm 76 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER (RL—RM) 000 UNITS AT 5OOxOOO EA, = 13541 0001a 00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 51, 0622 000 SF AT 0.100 EA. = 5,106.20 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) 36,292,000 SF AT 0,025 EAR = 907o,30 STREET (RL—RM) 10.000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EAR = 111250,00 STREET (ALL OTHERS) 139.000 FF AT 15,000 EA, = 2,085,00 SEC-17—T-29—R-22-00-42 ITEM 1 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER (RL—RM) 000 UNITS- AT 500,000 EAR = 0.00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) SF AT 0,100 EAR 0,00 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) 1,9 957.1 150.000 SF AT 0,025 EAR = 481928, 75 STREET (RL—RM) UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA, 0.00 STREET (ALL OTHERS) I, 470;w 150 FF AT 15,000 EAR 221052, 2 5 Is PAGE 3 OF 3 D/P NO. 6016 PROJECT NO., 89-03 EDGERTON/ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 (P) PROJECT SUMMARY SEC-17—T-29—R-22-012-43 ITEM 48 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE 10-04-1989 ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER (RL—RM) 5lwOOO UNITS AT 500m000 EAU = 25,500,00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 4301785.000 SF AT 0,100 EAR 013 STRM SEW 4CEMETARYIPARKS) 624,685m000 SF AT 0,025 EAR 151617,13 STREET (RL-RM) 000 UNIT AT 1,125a@00 EAR = 0800 STREET (ALL OTHERS.) @OLA FF AT 15,000 EAR 0.00 SEC-17—T-29—R —01-2-44 ITEM 78 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER (RL—RM) 170000 UNITS AT 500s000 EA. = 81500100 STRM SEW (RH—.COMM) 4301785.000 SF AT 0,100 EAR = 43,078.50 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PQRKS) 9091097s000 SF AT 0a025 EA, = 22, 727.43 STREET (RL—RM) 0,000 UNIT AT 1, 125.000 EAR 14-1,00 STREET (ALL OTHERS} 000 FF AT 15m000 EAR 6,372.00 SEC-18—T-29-R-22-00-14 ITEM 2 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER .(RL—RM) 20,000 UNITS AT 500m000 EAR 11l, 000.00 STRM SEW TRH—COMM) 301744.000 SF AT 0m100 EA, = 31 074.40 STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) FF SF AT 0x025 EAR 0&00 STREET (RL—RM) 0,000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA, 14-1,00 STREET ( ALL OTHERS) 424x800 FF AT 15,000 EA, 6,372.00 SEC-1.8—T-29—R-22-00-41 ITEM 21 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM 'SEWER (RL—RM) 20,000 UNITS AT 500m000 EAU = 11l, 000.00 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) 241,022,000 SF AT 0,.100 EAU 24,102,20 STRM SEW (CEMETARYIPARKS) FF SF AT 0,025 EA, 0&00 STREET (RL—RM) 6,000 UNIT AT 11125s000 EA. 6,75V".1.00 STREET (ALL -OTHERS) FF AT 15m000 EA, GRAND TOTALS 566 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY STORM SEWER (RL—RM) *******535n000 STRM SEW (RH—COMM) *29265,16210,m SM STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) *4,13789802a@100 STREET (RL"mmRM) 008 STREET (ALL OTHERS) *****4,1558o350 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT PER RATE ASSESSMENT UNITS AT **$500.000 EAU = *$267,500, 00 SF AT EA. = 226,1562,w 00 SF AT 0a025 EA. = 1091470,v@5 UNIT AT 17125a@@@ EA, = 699750U,60 FF AT 15e000 EAU = 68,375.25 741,1657n30 PROJECT NO, B9-03 D /P ND., 6016 DUPHT1 TY CHECK L I ST EDGE RTON/ ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 ( P ) RAGE 1 OF 1E 10 -04-1 389 C -1) = STORM SEWER ( RL -RM) -- UNITS COLO. a) STRM SEW ( RH- -OOMM) - SF 3) = STRM SEW CEMETARY /PARKS) - SF COL: 4) - STREET RL -RM) - UNIT COL. 5 1 = STREET ALL QTHE RS) - FF PIN No COL I COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17-29-22-13-0006 @v-.00 . on 00 O f 7-29-22-1 3 -O 7 Igoe 0100 ib.f 0 oleo 0. 0 L• Igoe oa a 00100 L•. f o 1800 0000 00-00 0000 o. 0o 17- E9-- 2: -13- 0010 1000 0 a 00 0.0o a 00 oleo 17-29-212-13-0011 1100 Or 00 Oa 00 Oa 00 0L 00 17-- 9-- Ems. -1.s- .001. I i oe o. eo 0600 o f eo oleo 7-29-2&-1 3-001 ..t I. oe 17- 29 -22-13 -0014 1.00 0.00 0 a 00 1.00 o. 00 2100 0800 0000 f .0th 0000 17-29-22-13-0016 1 a 00 0. oo 0400 1.00 0.00 17-29-.22-13-0017 1 a, 0 Oa 00 o. eo e m 00 0000 11-00 Or Oa 0o 0800 0 17-29-22-13-0019 1 • 00 oa eo @m oo 0000 oleo 17-29-22-13-0020 1800 O r 00 Oro@ 0000 @ 100 17- 29- 2.L -13 -00 1 1800 Oa 00 Oa 0o 0000 o. 00 17-29-22-13-0027 Igoe Or too 00 00 10800 0000 17-29-22-13-0028 Igoe 08 00 Or 00 0000 0400 17-29-222- 1 3--0029 1100 0.00 0.0o 0000 0400 17-29-22-13-0030 1.00 0.00 0.00 0a 00 o« 00 17-29- 22--13 -00, 1 1, m O r O a o0 O.00 17- R3 -22 -13 -0032 1000 OL D 0000 0.00 0.0o 17-R9-22-13.0033 11100 00 08 00 0800 0.100 17-229-.22-13-0034 1800 0.0o @. 00 0800 0800 1"7-29-22-13-0035 I.00 O a 00 oleo 1 r S. 0 0000 17-29-22-13-0036 1 a 00 Oa 00 O.0o 1800 0a 00 17 --L9- 2.2 -13-- 0037 1100 o. eo 0.00 Igoe o r eo 17-29-2Z- 13-0038 1100 0.0o 08,00 0800 0600 17 -29_i -13- -0039 1800 O 0000 0.00 o. 00 17--E9- -22- -;13- -0040 1 a 00 0400 0800 0.00 0. oo 17- -A29 -22_I 3-10041 I.0 0200 0400 el. a 1L.s 17- E9- 22 --.13- -0042 1.00 0000 0400 0.00 0.0o 17- -29- 22--13 -0043 1100 0000 0000 0800 0.Oo 17-29-22-13-0044 I. o0 0200 of 00 04 00 0« 00 17- 29--22 -13 -0052 1100 Oa 0o 0a 0o 0.0o 0.00 17-29-22-1.3-0054 1 a 00 Oa 00 0. 00 0a eo 0.00 17-29-R2-13-0055 1.00 Or oo 0000 0.00 0r 00 1000 0a 00 oleo 0000 0800 17-- .E9- E2--13 -0058 11000 os 00 0. eo 0.00 0r 00 17--29-22-13-0059 1400 0a 00 0000 1,600 0a 00 17 -E 3- L- 13 -00f 0 1000 0 r 00 0 a 00 1000 0.00 17- 29- -22 -113 -0061 Igoe 00 00 08,00 Igoe os oe 17-- 23-- 2.2 -13-0062 1200 0 r 00 0000 1600 0600 17-- 25 -22 -13 -0063 Igoe 0a 00 08 00 0000 0800 17-29_22-13-0064 Igoe 0.0o 0000 0.00 on 00 17- 29- 82--13 -0066 1000 oleo Oa 00 0000 0800 17- 29- 22--13 -0067 Igoe 0.00 of 00 0600 0800 17- 29- 22 --1.3 --0070 1000 0.00 Oa 00 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-13-0071 1.00 01000 0 r eo 0.00 oleo 17--429 -i2 -14 -0032 1.00 Oa 00 0800 0000 0. eo PROJECT NOs 8 9 -03 EDGERTON / ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 (P) AGE c OF 1 e. 10 -04 -1989 D/P NOr 6016 OUANT 1 TY CHECK LIST COL. 1) STORM SEWER RL -RM) -UNITS COL. 2) = STRM SEW RH -COMM) -- SF COL. -3) = STRM SEW CEMETARY / AARKS) - SF COL. -4) STREET ( RL RM ) - UNIT COL. 5 = STREET ( ALL OTHERS) - FF PIN NO& COL 1 COL E COIL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17-- 89- -EE -14-- -003 3 @ s 00 0400 0.00 oleo 17-29-22-14-0034 0800 @aoe 0r oo 17-29-82-1.4-0035 1, 00- 0e ft 0.000 Or 00 oleo 17-729`22 -14 --0036 1 r; u 00' 0060 O.00 Or 17-29-22,14-0037 1 ones 0: 00 10,000 0.00 17-- 29-- 22 -14 -+ 038 Igoe 0s, 00 1 s 0o 0.0o 17- -29 -E2 -14 -0039 1100 elm, 00 1 r 00 of 00 17-29-22-14-0040 1..: 80 0w 0 04 00 1100 0r 00 17-29-22-14-0050, 1100 O r 0o oleo i. 0o 0400 8 -1+- 1.00 0800 Or 00 1 r 0. e0 7- -29 --EL -- 1'4."-0052 1 r 00 0400 0.00 1.00 0 r 00 17-29-122-14-0053 Igoe 0r 00 0r 00 f s 00 0r 00 17-29-22-14-0.054 is 00 fpm 00 0 00 1 r 00 fir o0 17-29-,22- 14-0055 1100 0xi 00 0. o0 1.0e 0400 17-29-22-14-0079 1.00 on 010 0800 1 r 00 oleo 17-29-22--14 -0080 i r 00 0r 00 0.0o 1100 01.00 1'7- -29- -22-14 -0081 1'r 00 0IV 00 0.00 1800 es 00 17- -29- -2 -14- -008: 1100% 0800 0. 00 1800 0 r 00 17- 29--22 --2- --0002 1.0 0/ 00 0400 0r 00 0.00 17- -29- -22 -22 -0003 1.;"1 0000 0n 0o 0000 0r 00 17- -29- 22`22--0004 1 s e@ 0r 00 0.00 0400 @m 00 172-29- 22 -22- -000, 1100 0r 00 Or eo 0000 0600 17-29-42-2-22 -0006 1 sa 00 oleo 0 r 00 oleo o r 00 17-29-22-22-0007 1100 0 r 00 oleo 0 r eo 0 r 00 17-29-22-22-0008 1800 O r 00 0.00 oleo o r eo 17-29-22-22-0009 1-800 oleo 0 r 00 oleo 0 r 00 17-29-22-22--0010 Igoe 0 r 00 o. eo 0.00 ore o 17-29-22-22-0013 Igoe 0 r 00 0.00 0.00 0000 17-- 29- -22 -22 -0014 1000 0 s 00 0l 00 0.00 O.e0 17- -29- 22-- 2E- 0015 i'm oo 0r 00 0000 06 00 0s eo 17- 29--22--22 --0016 1100 0: 00+ 0000 0000 0.00 7- 29 -22 -22 -0017 @r ee 11939.00 or eo or eo oleo 17-29-22-22-0018 1. oe 0.00 0+r eo 0.00 0.00 17- 29 -E2 -28 -0019 1100 0.00 040000 O r 00 O r 00 17-29-22-22-0020 1100 0 r 0+0 0.00 0.00 0400 17729-22-22-0022 1000 o. 00 0000 0000 Or 00 17-29-. 2-22 -22-0023 1600 0 r 00 oleo 0 r 00 0900 17-29-22-22-002424 1100 O r 00 0800 0 r e o 0000 1 f- 89- -22 -22 -0085 I r oe oleo 0.00 @ r oo o. eo 17- '29- --22 -EE- -0026 1100 Or 00 0.00 0r 00 0.00 17- 29-- 2E--2E -0027 1.00 0000 0.00 @ r oo 0800 17--89--22 --22 --0028 21 00 0000 0r 00 0r eo 0 4- 00 17- 29- -2E-2E-0029 1 s oo @ w 00 0000 0400 o f 00 17-29-22-22-0030 1100 0000 0900 0.00 0800 17 --89-.2-22 -0031 1900 0. Der 0r O0 ev 00 0r oo 17 -29- 22-E2 -0032 Igoe 0 r 00 O s 00 0000 O r 00 17- -29- -22- - 22- -0033 1.00 @ woo oleo 0t r 00+ 0000 17-29-22-22.0035 1100 0r 00 0. 0O 0s 00 02 00 17- 29 -22 -22 -0036 1000 0 0 00 o• eo 0100 o r eo 17-29-22-22-0037 1000 0 r 00 oleo 0000 0000 PROJECT CVO. 89--03 EDGERTON/ ROSELAWN IMP PH . PAGE 3 OF 12 10 -04 -1989 P NOs 6018 QUANT.I TY CHECK LIST COL.. 13 = STORM SEWER 4 RL-RM 3 - UNITS COL. 2 = STRM SEW 4 RH- -00MM) - SF COL. 3) = STRM SEW ( CEMETA RY / FA RKS) - SF COL. 4) = STREET 4 RL-RM.) -- UNIT COL.. 5) = STREET (ALL OTHERS) - FF PI-NPI-N NOAN COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17-29-22-122 41- 0038 11 00 0 s 00 Os 00 0.00 0100 17"29 -22 -22 -0041 1.00 0., 00 0000 0.00 0000 17 -29 -22--22 -0042 la 60 am-ft 0. oo 0.00 00,00 17-29-22-22-0043 1100 @ w 0o oleo 0.00 17-29-P-2-22-0044 11000 0.0o oleo oleo @Soo 17- .29 -22 -22 -004 i . 00 0000 0000 on DO 0.00 17 -29- 22--22-0046 1 s 00 0000 0. oo 0.00 0000 17-29-22-22-0047 i . @@ 0. oo 0000 On Q40 0800 17- -29- -22 -22 -0048 i s @@ 01000 00,00 0000 0.00 17 --29- .22--22 --0049 1200 0.00 0000 O.00 0800 17"'29-22 -.22-0050 800 Os 00 0.00 0. 00 0000 i 7- -E9- 22--22 -0051 11000 @100 1 0800 000.0 0400 17-29-22-22-0052 IV 00 0.00 0000 0000 0000 17 -23-- 2--22--•0053 1100 0.00 of 00 0800 0.00 17-29-22-22-0054 1000 0000 0000 0800 0000 17- 29- -22-- EL - -00 5 1800 0000 0800 0000 on 00 1 29 L2 -E2- 0056 1 i O0 0000 oleo 0.000 0000 17-29-22-22-0057 1000 0000 09 00 0800 on oo 17- -29 -22 -22 -0058 1100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0o 17- -29- ,2c --22 --0059 1100 0 r 00 0000 0000 0.00 17- 29- -22 -22 -0060 IS . 4. oo o. eo el. 00 0100. 17-- 9 -22 -E2 -@061 1 # 00 0800 0.110 Oa. OQ1 0.00 17-25-22-22-0062 0200 0. oo iZE. 00 0.000 17- 29 -22 -22 -006 3 1.00 0000 0. oo 0.0o 0.00 17-- 29- i2--22 --0064 1100 @ s oo @goo 0000 o. eoy, 17- x..9"22 -.2i -0065 1000 @g oo 01 . Q1 Q1 0. i.0 17-29-22-22-.0066 1.00 0.00 0800 0000 0.00 17-29-22-22-0068 i 00 0000 0.00 0200 on 00 17-29- -22 -22 -0069 1800 0600 0. oo 0800 0 0 00 17-- 29- 22-_22 -007 0 1000 0100 @. oo O. eo 0100 17- -.2'9--2; -22 -0071 i s oo 0000 0.00 0.00 0100 17-29-u2N2: 1-22-0073 i s 00 0000 0.00 0400 0100 17-- 29 -..2 `x2 --0074 1 a 00 0000 0.1600 0s DO 0000 1 7- -29--22- -22-0075 0000 0800 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-22-0076 1000 0. DO O.00 0600 O.00 17- -29 -22- 22--0077 1.00 0.00 on ell 0 f 00 17-29- 22--22 -0078 1800 On 0800 0.00 0100 17 --29 -2 -22--0079 1.00 00 0000 0.00 0.00 0000 17-- 29 -22 -22 -0080 1.00 0s 00 0000 0.00 Om 00 17-29-22-82-0081 11000 0.00 0800 0.00 0200 17-- 23--22 -22- -0082 1000 0.00 0000 of 00 Oi O0 17- 29- -22 -22 --0083 1000 oleo @s 00 0800 0000 17-29 22-22-0084 1000 0000 0.00 0800 04100 O s o0 0.00 0000 0.00 17- 9 -22 -22 -0088 i s 00 0000 0000 0.00 0200 17- 29- -2.2- -22 --0087 1800 0000 0000 @moo 0.00 17- 29 -22 -22 -0088 11900 0000 0. 00 0400 0000 1.00 0.00 01600 0800 0.00 17- -29- -22-- 22--0090 1000 0000 of 00 00 00 0400 8` -, .I30E RTO V I ROS.Lf W 1 IMP 'H 1 (P l 'Gk 4 OF 1 PROJECT N 10-04-1989 D/P NO, 6016 N DUANT.1 TY CHECK L I ST COL. 1 I = STORM SEWER RL -RM ? - UNITS COL, 2) = STRM SEW (RH- COMM) -- SF COL., 3) - STRM SEW (CEMETHRY /PARKS) SF EOL„ -4) STREET L- M); --,,UNIT COL. 5) = STREET tALL OTHERS) - FF NDw, C-01- 1 COL. 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17- -29- 2E--22 -0091. ez, 01 10- 0 Zoe@ ev e@ oleo IV-00 o. eo @S 00 oleo 0000 1. o0 0 f 0o o. 00 0000 0200 17-29-22-22-0103 I's !Be 0000 0000 0000 0400 17-- 29-- 22 -22- 0106 2,00 @a 00 0.00 oleo 0.00 1000 0000 oleo 0000 1000 0000 owe@ laselo 0800 17- 29- i..2- 2 -000:a Y.Ps 4310, 0z 00 iL ;i o• 2m, 00 00 0l 0.0 0 0 00 0 9 00 17 -2922 23 -0005, Ni et Q eel el i Q i L' 17-29-22-23-0006 0.00 0000 0. eo 0.00 17- 29_2 -23 -0007 1000 0i 00 0900 0.00 0000 17- -29 -2E -23 -0008 2 * 00 amoo 08 00 @ t 00 0100 17- -29° .2.E- E3- -.0009 1100 on 00 0.00 of 00 0400 17-29-22-2;3-0010 1 i is i V L` t.• i Z.• mow' 17 29- 22- 23- -0011 laze of 00 0000 0800 on 00 17- 29 -2 -R3 -0012 1 s 0 01100 0000 0000 0.00 17-29-22-23-0013 in 00 138619, 0.00 e+i 00 0.00 17- 29 -2 3-0014 I S 0 03160 @I 00 o. 00 0.0o 17- 29- 22- 23- 0015 Inez 0s 0o 0i 00 12i 0.00 17- 29 -22 -i2 -00.6 1:00 oleo 0600 o. e@ 0800 17-29-422-23-0017 1.00 0000 01000 0800 0s 00 17-29-R2-R3-001 8 1000 iii 00 e m oo elm Q10 oleo 17- -29°-2 -E3- -0019 11080 00 0.00 i 00 0800, 17-29-22-23-10020 1., @0 0.0o ON 00 0.00 0100 17-E9-22.23-0021 1 ; 2119. 0000 oleo 0 i 00 0000 17-- 29•- -22 -23 --0022 1.00 0000 0.00 0000 0000 17-R9-22-23-0023 1100 0i 00 0.00 0000 0.00 17-- 29 -R2 -23 --0024 1,800 0000 0000 0. oo 0.00 17- 9 °22- -23 -0020 1.00 0.00 0i 00 0.00 on 00 7-29-2s2-23-00 1000 0.00 0 s 00 0800 0.100 17-29-.22-23-0027 I. ors o. eo 0,000 0000 @loo 17- 9- -- - 1000 0.00 o. oo o s coo oleo 17-29-,22-23-0029 1000 0i oo 0000 00 00 0.00 17-- .29- 22 ---23- -0030 1100 0800 0800 0000 0900 17- 29--22 --23 -00,31 Igoe 0000 0s 00 00 00 0100 17-29-22-23-0032 1000 0800 0. 00 0.00 oleo 17-29-22-23-0033 I.00 @m oo 0000 0000 0400 17-25-22-23-0034 1.800 o f 00 0. eo 0 s 00 0900 1-7-129-22-23-0035 1.000 0i 00 0800 0800 0100 17 -29- 22--23 -0036 1.00 0000 01100 0i 00 0400 17 -29- 22--23 -0037 1.00 01000 0100 0.00 0000 17- 29- -22 -23 -0038 1.00 0. eo 0.0o 0i 00 0.0o 17-29-22-23-0039 1800 0000 01600 0000 0000 IL 7-29-22-23-10040 2, 00 oleo 0 s eo 0.0o 0800 17- 29- 22 -23 -0041 1800 0.00 ell 00 00 00 01.00 17- -29- 22r -23-0042 11000 0.00 0.00 0000 17-29-22-23-0043 i s QUO 0400 0000 0000 0.00 i a oo o. eo t @. oL17-k-29-217-k-29-22-23-0044 17- 29- 22- 23-0045 1 a 00 ai oo Oa oo oleo oleo PROJECT MO. .89 -03 EDGE RTON/ ROSELAWN IMP FAH 1 P) PAGE 5 OF 1 10- 04-198J D/P NO* 6016 0 QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL.. 11 = STORM SEWER RL -RM) --- UNITS LC 0L-a a STRM SEW I RH -COMM) - SF COL. 3) = STRX SFW (EMETARY /PARKS) SF COL. -4) - STREET R - M) - UNIT COL a 5) = STREET (ALL DTNERS ) - FF PI NOS, COL 1 C-. COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 00 17--29- 2E- .3 -47, 0 a i os eta. 17- -29 -22- 23--0048 ow 061 es 00 ol 00 17- E9 -22 -E3 -0049 4 as a am. ez 00,00 era ego 17-29-22-23-0050 a 0 ella 00 oleo oleo 17-29-2-2-23-0051 17-29-22-23-0052 1. ee @s oo 0000 0000 17- 29-'22 23-005,3 6,000 0000 Qua oo 00 00 o. eo 7-29-22-23-00554 I'm 00 01000 oleo o. eo 0800 17-29-22-23-0055 04100 1 20. 78 17-29 -p2-23 -0056 3s, N 00 L.. . 7 17-29-22-23-0057 3., aw 00 08 01a, 11,00. 123.78 s z oleo 39411.00 e a oo 123s 16 17- 29-22 -23 -0059 0000 0000 220114. ISO 0000 247v56 310-00 04,00 oleo 0000 123,78 2.4 00 0000 1800 120a 78 17- 29 -22 -23 -0062_ 010 a 0 0600 o. eo 17- -29 --2x.. 23 --0063 2X@01 a. o o 0000 fir 00 0000 17-29-22-23-0064 5* 00 Or eo 0000 or eo o. eo 17-29-22-23-00655 1000 er o@ r oa 00 o. eo 17-29-22-24-0001 01. 0 84185.. 00 @aee 0800 o v 00 17- 29- -22 --E4 -0002 a W 87073s, OLA 0800 0000 0400 17- -29- -22-24- -0003 o a -00 0000 15 718.00 Oleo 0:00 17-29-22-24-0004 10,00 @r oo 54637a OO 0800 0000 17-- 29-E2- 24--0005 @ a oo 51878.00 oleo 0 r 00 0.00 17- 29 -2L--2 ,4`0006 0800 7'9014r 00 0000 0a 00 oleo 17- -23- -2`- -24 -00 7 01 100 597. 8 r @O 0000 0:00 oleo 17-29-22-24-0008 0000 2@4617.00 0000 0, 00 17-29-22-24-0009 fit. . 3 9'76.8-., 00 @ g oo 0800 on 00 17-29-22-24-0010 o. eo 4500,00 0000 ear oo era eo 17-29-22-24-0011 1 offiz o• eo 0000 1 r 00 0000 17-29-22-24-0012 1100 oleo oleo 11000 o. ego 17-29-22-:24-00 13 1 a. Q. 1 a on 00 17- 29-22 --24 —•0014 i . R.. oleo 1100 om ego 17-29-22-24-0015 1000 et. oo oleo 1800 oleo 17-- .29- 22--24 --0018 1100 oleo 0800 1000 0,100 17 -29- 22--24 -0017 1800 @. oo 0000 i . oo o. eo 17- -8'9 -22 -24 -0018 1400 oa ego 08 00 1100 0400 1. oo oleo o. oo 1800 o. 00 17 29-22-24-0020 1800 @. oo oa oo 1900 of e o 17 --29- 22--84 -0021 one@ 180774 0.00 @. oo 0800 435.10 17- 29- 22 -24-. 0022 0900 44800a00 @a oo @. oo 0000 17 -29- 22'-31 -0001 1600 0 a eye+ oleo 1800 @a 00 17-29-22-31-0003003 0.. 00 1 066000 00 00 00 era oo 0000 17- 29 -E2- 31--0004 2100 @g ego o. e o i a oo 0800 17- 29- -22 -31 -0005 1100 0000 oleo 1800 08 00 17--29 - 22--31 -0006 1000 0200 oleo 1400 oleo 17-- 29 -22 -31 -0007 2s00 @m oo oleo 1400 0800 17-29-22-31-0008 1 s oo 0000 eta oo 1. oo or oo 17-29-22-31-0009 110,0 0a 00 o. e o Qua eo PROJECT NO. 89 -03PAR EDGERTON/ ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 t P ? PAGE 6 OF 12 10 -04 -1989 O!P NO, 6016 OUANTI TY CHECK LIST COLA 1 } = STORK SEWER 4 RL--RM 3 - UNITS CDL N 2 3 ST RM SEW (RH- COMM) -- SF COL. 3} = STRM SEW (CEMETARY /PARKS) - SF COL. 4 } _ STREET ( RL-- RM) -- UN I T COL. 5 } = STREET 1LL OTHERS) - FF PIN NO. a, LI 1. COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17-29-22-31-0010 1.0@ 0 1.00, @. 00 17- 29 -2 -31 -.0011 aw W. 0« 00 Og 00 0400.00 17-29-22-31.0012 @0 @. @@ 0.00 0000 0i 00 17- 29- 22--31 -0024 o. eo 0000 18 :081 i 00 01000 0000 17-29-22-31-0025 1800 0000 0600 o. oo 0l 00 17-29-22-3.1-0026 1000 0000 @. 00 0200 0 i 00 17 -29- 22--31 -0027 1.0@ 01100 0.00 0800 17- 29- -22 --31 -003 I'v 00 Ole (B0 0800 0.00 0 .00 17-29-2-2-31-00,31. ,31. i w 0 i of oo of e'er` 17-29-22-31-0032 1000 @see Om 0 @. 00 of e0 17-29-22-31-0033 1.00 0000 @. @0 oleo 0.00 17-29-22-31-0034 1000 0.00 @ g 00 00.00 0.0o 17- 29-- 22- 31#-0035 1,:00 0800 fit. 00 0800 0800 17-- 29- -22 -31 -0036 1100 04100 0.00 @i 00 Oi 00 17-- 29 -22 -3_ 1 --00 7 4 0 000 0000 @ moo oleo 17- 29- 22- 31 --00, 8 1,800. 1 0100 @. 00 0800 O i 00 1000 0800 0. @o 0.0o 0. eo 17-29-22-31-0040 1 i @0 0000 0000 0.00 oleo 17-29-22-31-0041 1.00 0* 00 @. 00 oleo 0100 17- 29 -22 -31 -0042 1 01000 0. @0 0000 ol 171-29-22-31-0043 1100 0 r 00 0.0o @. 00 0 i 0.0 17-29-22-31-0045 1000 oleo o i 00 0000 0000 17-29-22-31-0046 1 i @@ @ • 00 0800 0 8 00 0000 17-- 29- -22 -31 -+0047 1 i 00 0. @0 00 00 @i 00 0.100 17- 29- 22--31 -0048 1000 0.00 0000 oleo 01100 17-29-22-31-0049 1100 of 00 04 00 @ 00 0. 00 17- 29- -22 --31 -0050 1000 0000 0800 @. @0 0000 17-- 29- 22- -31 -0051 1800 0. @0 0900 Oi 00 0.00 17-29-22-31-0052 1400 Oi @0 @. @0 @. @0 17- 29- 22- 31 -0053 1800 @. 00 0.00 @i 00 0.00 17 -89 -22-31 --0054 1100 @i 00 0800 @. oo Oleo 17-29-22-.31-005-5 1100 @. 00 Oi 00 0.00 0000 17-29-22-31-00566 1.00 0000 0000 0 4 00 01100 17-29-22-31-005-9 1.0@ 0000 @i eo 0000 01.00 17- -E9- -22 -.31 -0060 1100 @. oo 0800 0800 01600 17- 29 -22 -31 -0061 11900 0 i 00 0.00 0800 0. e o 17-29-22-31-0062 1 i 00 @. @0 @. oo @. eo 0100 17- 29 -22 -31 -0063 1800 0000 0800 0000 0i 00 17-- 29- 22- 32 -0 001 8. @0 0.00 0800 0.00 293, 23 17--- 29 -22 -32 -00@2 1000 0800 0000 @. 00 0800 17- 29- 22.32--0003 14100 0.0@ 01000 0000 00 00 17-29- -22 -32 -0004 0.00 462318.00 0. @0 0000 8181 45 17-29-22-32-0005 2000 0100 @. 00 1. @0 0100 17 -29- 22--34 --0001 2000 e. @0 oleo 0000 0000 17-- 29- -22 --34 -0002 1800 0000 0000 @. 00 01,00 17 -29-- 22--34 --0003 2.00 0000 0000 0.00 Oi 00 17-29-22-34-000404 1, oo @. oo 0.00 Oi eo 0800 17--29 - 22--34 -0005 i i e@ @i @0 00 00 Oi e o 01000 17-29-22-34-0006 1000 0. @0 0. @@ 0. @e+ 0100 17-29-22-34-0007 1.00 0000 0000 0.00 0000 PROJECT NO. 89 -03 EDGERTONI ROSELAWN IMP PH i (P) PAGE 7 OF 12 1 -04 -1989 D/P NO. 6016 QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM SEWER (RL -RM) - UNITS COL. 2) = STRM SEW (RH -COMM) - SF COL. 3) STRM SEW (CEMETARY /PARKS) - SF COL. 4) STREET t RL -RM l -- UNIT COL. 5 ) = STREET ALL OTHERS) - FF PIN NO.- COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL. 4 COL i 17- 29 -22 -34 -0008 1.00 0.00 17-29-22-34-0009 1 r oo @ r 00 0.0 0 @. 00 0000 17-29-22-34--0010 1..00 0.00 0000 0000 0.00 17-29-22-34-0011 1 s lbe, of 00 0000 O. eo 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0012 1800 0r e0 0400 0.0o 0800 17-29-22-34-0013 1.00 O. eo 0800 0400 0400 17-29-22-34-0014 1900 0.00 0800 0800 0800 17-29-22-34-0015 1.00 0.00 0.00 0000 0000 17- 29 -22- 34 -0016 1800 0l 00 0.00 0.00 0800 17-29-22-34-0017 1800 0.00 0400 0400 0000 17- 89 -22 -34 --0018 2000 0.00 0.00 0000 0. eo 17 -9- 22--34 -0019 2100 0.00 0.00 0800 0000 17- 29 -22 -34 -0020 1800 0.00 0.00 0.00 0000 17- 29 -22 -34 -0044 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 17- -E9 -22 -34 -0047 4.00 0.0o 01600 0.00 0800 17-29,22-34-0048 1000 0a 00 00,00 0200 0.00 17-29-22-34-0049 1800 00 00 01000 0600 0.00 17-- 29- 22- 34- 0050 1100 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 17-- 29 -22 -34 --0001 1000 0.00 0.00 Or 00 0.00 17 -29- 22-34 -0052 1100 0000 0.00 0400 0400 17-.29-22-34-0053 1100 0400 0.00 0000 0.00 17-29-22-34-0054 1000 0400 0r 00 0800 0000 17- 29 -22 -34 -0055 1.00 0800 0.00 0. 00 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 --0056 1800 O« 00 0.00 O.00 0.00 17-29-22-34-00577 1.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 17- 29- 22-34 -0008 1000 0000 01000 on 00 0800 17-89-82-34-0059 2000 of 00 O.00 01000 0000 17 -29- 22--34 -0060 2. oo 0.00 on Ott 0000 0000 17- 29 -22 -34 -0062 2.00 0000 01000 0.00 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0063 1000 0. eo 0.00 0000 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0064 1.00 0.00 0200 0.00 0600 17 -29- 22-34 -006, 1000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0066 1100 0800 Or 00 Or 00 0000 17--29 -22 34 -0067 1.00 0.00 O.00 0900 0.00 17- -29- 22-34- -0068 1900 0800 oleo 0400 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0069 1000 0000 0000 0800 0800 17- -29 -22- 34--0070 1100 0800 0.00 0600 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0071 1100 0.00 0.00 0000 0000 17- 29 -22 -34 -0076 1600 0000 0200 0.00 0.00 17- 29 -22 -34 -0077 1.00 0400 0400 Or OO 0. e0 17- 29- 22 -41- -0001 0.00 5 1062.00 0.00 0.00 139.00 17- 29 -22 -41 -0002 1100 0000 0000 O.00 0.00 17-29-22-41-0003 0900 0000 0800 1600 0600 17 -29- 22--41 -0004 0.00 Or 00 0.0e 1.00 0.00 17- 29 -22 -41 -0005 0000 0.00 0000 1800 08,00 17- 29 -22 -41 -0006 O.00 0000 0800 1000 0800 17-- 29 -22 -41 -0007 0000 0.00 0.00 1400 0.00 17- 29 -22 -41 -0008 0000 0400 0800 1.00 0000 17-29-22-41-0009 O.00 0.0o 0.00 1100 0800 17- 29 -22 -41 -0010 1000 0000 0.00 1000 0000 89- EDGERTONl ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 i P 3 PAGE. 8 OF 12 PROJECT NO. 10 -04 -1989 D/P NO. 6 016 OUANT I TY CHEEK LIST COL. 13 = STORM SEWER (RL -RM) - UNITS COL. 2) ST RM SEW RH -COMM ) - SF COL. 3) ST RM SEW CE ETARY /'ARKS) -- SF COL. 4) = STREET. (RL -RM ) -- UNIT COL. 5 3 = STREET (ALL OTHERS) - FF PIN NO. VOL 1 COL, 2 COL. 3 COL. 4 COL r 17--9--E2_41-0011 1 00'+. Ott 0.00 1 00 0000 17-29-22-41-0012 1000 a 00 0. 00 1.00 0.00 17- 29- -22-41 -0013 1200 0.00 oleo o l eo oleo 17--29-- 28 -41 -0014 1000 0000 0000 0000 0.00 17- -29--22 -41 -0015 11900 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-41-0016 1.00 @g 00 0800 01,00 0.00 17-29-22-4.1-0017 1000 0000 0800 0. eo 0800 17- -89 -22 -41 -0018 14 Oil 0000 0.00 0.00 0000 17-29-22-4,1-0019 11800 0000 0000 01100 0.010 17-- 89-- 28--41 -0080 1800 01500 o. 00 0.100 0.00 17-29-22-41-0021 1.00 0.00+ 0900 0000 0.00 17- 89 -22 -41 -0022 Imea, 0000 0000 0400 0800 17 -29- -EL 41 -0023 1 Soo 01000 0000 0900 on oo 17- .29 -22 -41 -0024 1000 oleo om oar oleo 0600 17-- 123- 22 -41- -002 1800 0.00 0900 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-41-0026 1000 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 17- -29- -E2-41 -0087 1000 0.00 @ g 00 0.00 01600 17-- 89- 82-4.1- 0088 1.000 0.00 0.00 0000 0800 17 -89-- 88--41 --0089 1800 0.00 0.00 0800 0400 1100 0800 0.00 0000 0." 00 17- 1:29 -22-41 -0031 1.00 e. 00 0100 0000 oleo 17- 29'-22 -41 -0032 1100 10000 0600 0000 0200 17-29-22-41-0033 1800 0400 0800 0.00 0.00 17- E9- -E8 -41 -0034 1000 0600 01300 00010 0.010 17-29,22-41-0035 1 » o@ 0.0o 0000 oleo 0.00 17- 29 -88 -41 -003 1000 o. eo 0.00 0800 0.00 17- -89-88- 41-0037 1000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 17-29-22-41-00388 1 m o0 0.00 0.00 0000 0900 17-29-22-41-00399 1000 0.00 0.00 10000 0. eo 17-89-22-41-0040 11800 000.0 0.00 0.100 0900 17- 2-9- -22-41 -0041 1100 of o 01000 oleo oleo 17-29-22-41-0042 1800 0.00 0.1010 0.00 10.00 17-- 29- 22- 41- 1004,E 11000 1'0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17-29-22-41-0044 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0000 10.00 17-29-22-41-0045 1..00 0.0o 0.00 0.0o 0800 17-,29-22-41-0046 0.0o 0000 01000 0.0o 1'7-29-22-41-0 047 1.00 0000 0000 0 8 00 0.00 17- -29 -22- 41--0048 1000 0. 00 0.010 0.00 10.010 17-29-.22-41-0049 11010 0100 0.00 0200 0.010 1.00 0.00 0000 0. oo 0000 17- 89 - -41 -01001 1.00 0.00 0. o0 0000 0000 17- 89`- EE--41 -00.8 1000 0400 0.00 08100 10800 17--89 -E8 -41 -0+053 1000 0.00 0600 0.010 0600 17-- 89 -82 -41 -0054 1.00 0000 0000 0000 0.00 17-29-22-41-0055 1000 0.010 0.00 0.00 0.00 17--89- 88 -4.1 -0058 1000 0800 0.00 0.00 0400 17-29-22-41-0057 1100 0000 0.00 0. 00 0.00 17-29-22-41-0058 0000 0.00 36292.010 0000 0000 7-29-22-41-0060 1800 0.0o 0.00 0. 00 0. eo 17- 29- 82 -41-- 01062 1000 0400 0000 10600 0.00 PROJECT Nil. 89-03 EDGE RTON/ ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 R } PAGE 9 OF 12 10 -4- i 989 DIA NCI. 6016 6 OUANTI TY CHECK LIST COL. 1} = STORM SEWER RL -RM} - UNITS COL. 2 } - STRN SEW ( RH -COMM ) - SF COL, 3} STRM SEW (.CEMETARY /PARKS) - SF COLS' 4 } _STREET ( RL--RN ) - UNIT COLO 51 - STREET (ALL OTHERS) - EF PIN . NOw COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17- 29- 22- 41--0063 Ci 00 of Ott Oi e0 Oi Ott oleo 17-29-,22-41-0064 1000 0i 00 0400 0000 0000 17-29-22-41-10065 1800 o f eta 0800 0.00 0400 17- 29 -22 -41 -0066 11900 0i 00 0000 0400 0i 00 17-R9-22-411-0067 1000 @Soo 0. oo @S 0th 17-29-22-41-00680068 1.00 0i eo 08 00 0.00 0.00 17 -29 -22 41--0069 i i 00 0800 0900 0i 00 0i 00 17-29-22-41-0070 1000 04 00 0000 0• e0 0i eo 17 -29- 22--41 -0071 1000 0i 00 Oi 00 01000 Oi 0o 17- 29 -22 -41 --0072 1000 Oi 00 0400 01,00 0.00 17-29-22-41--0073 1.00 0800 0 i 00 0.1 0 0800 17-- 29 -22 -41 --0074 100000 0i 00 0i oo on 00 0.00 17- 29- -22 -41 -0075 1 i 00 0000 0 i 00 O i 00 0800 17- 29 -22*-41 --0076 1000 0i 00 oleo 0800 oleo 17- 29 -22-41 -0077 i i 00 0800 0.00 0000 0000 17°- 29- 22-41- -,0078 1400 0i 00 0000 0200 0.100 17-29-22-42-0001 0.00 0. iZ o 1 ` 571 v0i 00 0000 1470,15 17-29-22-43-0002 oa 00 0000 40110.00 0000 00 00 17- 29- 22 -43-0003 0800 0.0o 79273.00 0w 00 0.00 17- 29--0.2-- 43--0004 2600 0 i 00 0400 08 00 0000 17- 29 -22 -43 -0005 1000 0.00 0000 0.00 0.0o 17- 29- 2-2 -43-0006 1900 Oi 00 Oi 00 Oi 0o 0. e0 17-29-22-43-0008 0000 0 i 00 174240m00 0400 0 i 00 17- -29 -22 -43 -0009 2 0O 0900 0i 00 0800 0000 17-29-22-43-0010 2 i 00 0000 0 i 00 0000 0000 17- 29 -22 -43 -0011 21-00 0000 0400 0.00 0. 00 17- -29- -E2 -43 -1012 2w@0 0i eo 0600 0800 0a oo 17-29-22-43-0013 2400 0i 0th 0000 0800 0000 17--29-- 22- -43- -0014 i w 00 0800 0 i 00 0.00 oleo 17- E9- -ma2-43 --0010 1000 00 00 0900 0000 0800 17 -29-22-43 -0016 1000 0.00 0000 0.00 0R 00 17-29-22-43-0017 11000 0800 0i eo 0.00 0000 17-29-22-43-0018 1800 0.00 0 i 00 oleo O i 00 17-29-22-43-0019 1800 0 i 00 0.00 oleo 0 i 00 17-2.9-22-43-0020 1.00 oleo 0i 00 0i 00 0000 17- -E9-- 2--43 -0021 1100 0i 00 0800 0i 00 0000 17- 29- 22 -43-002 1800 0.0o oleo. 0 i 00 0. 0o 17- 29--22- -43 -0023 1.00 @m oo 0i 00 0000 0r eo 17-29-22-43-0024 1400 0 i 00 0w 00 0.00 o f 00 17 --29- 22--43 -0020 1800 00 00 0w oo oleo 0800 17 -29 -22-43 -0027 1000 0 i 00 oleo 0 i 00 0800 17- 29 -22 -43 -0028 11000 0i 00 0000 0w 00 0.00 17-29-22-43-0029 1000 0 f 00 0000 0 i 00 oleo 17--23 -22 -43 -0030 1200 @v 00 0w 00 @goo 0i 00 1.7--29- 22--43 -0031 11000 oleo 0.00 oleo 0.00 17- 29-- 22 --43-0032 1000 0.0o 0i 00 0000 0000 17--29 -- 22--43 -0033 1200 0000. 0i 00 0i 00 0.00 17- •29- E2 -43 -0034 1800 0 i 00 0. oo @g oo 0. eo 17- 29- 22 -43- .00.35 1800 e i 00 0000 oleo 0600 17- 29- 22- 43- -0036 1000 0.00 0i eo 0i 00 01,00 PROJECT NO. 85--03 EDGER TON / ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 (P) PAGE 10 OF 12 D/A NO, 6016 1.0 -04 -1989 DDANT I TY CHECK LIST COL, 1) = STORM SEWER (RL -RM) - UNITS COLa 2) = STRM SEW RH -COMM) -- SF COLS 3) = STRM SEW CEMETARY /PARKS) . SF COL* 4) = STREET ( RL -RM) - UNIT STREET (ALL OTHERS) - FF PIN NOW COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 1'7- -E 9--2?- -43 -003? 1 00 0800 0000 0000 O.00 17 --29- 22--43 -0038 1 S 00 0. 00 0.00 0800 0. eo 1'7- 29 -22 -43 -0039 1 eke @ • oo o. eo 0.00 17-29 -22 -43 --0040 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0800 1.7a-- 29- -28 -43 --0041 1.00 0.00 0000 0800 0000 1°- E9 - -43 --0048 1200 080 000 0400 Of 00 47-- 29- 22--43 -0043 0.00 0. e0 0. eo 0800 17- 29 -22 -43 -0046 1.00 0000 0.00 0800 0400 0.00 Of OO 0. 0o17-29-22-43-0048 1.00 0.00 0800 0. 00 0.00 17-29-22-43-0049 Inoo 0 f 00 0000 0000 0.00 17-29-22-43-0050 1000 04,00 0.00 0400 oa 0017-29-22-43-0051 oleo 0.00 331056.00 0000 06000 17- 29- 22--43 --0002 1200 0000 es 00 01,00 0.00 17- 29 -iz-2-43 -0055 2000 0.0o 0000 01000 oleo 17- 29 -E2 -44 -0001 0.00 6000.00 0f 00 01000 080017 --29-L.L.. -44 --0002 0000 547. 0.00 0 f 00 fit. 00 jy]++ 0 0800 100.00000 0f 00 0000 Of 00 oleo 12400 s 00 0.00 0800 080017-- E9- 22- 44- -0005 1.00 0000 0.00 0.00 om 00 17-29-22-.44-0006 1100 0800 0000 0.00 0. QUO17-- 29- 22 -44- -0007 1800 0f 00 0f 00 0.00 0.0017- -25- 22- 44--0008 2400 O.Oo oleo 0000 17-- E9 -22 -44 -0005 0000 0800 909097.00 0000 0f 0017-29-22-44-0011 4.00 0800 0800 04,00 0.0017 -29 -22-44 -0012 0.00 80537 a OO 01000 0000 0.0017- E9- -2E -44 -0013 1800 0600 01000 0f 00 0.0017--29- i2-44 -0014 1100 0000 0000 0.00 Of 0017 -29- -2 -44 -0015 Lf 00 0.00 0.00 o. 00 0.0017- 29--i2 -44 -0016 Of 00 9675.00 0900 Of 00 0.0017-- 29- -ii -44 --001 I 0200 10,x`0.00 0800 0800 0.80017-- 25- -22 -44 -0018 0000 17603.00 0000 0800 000017 -29 -22 44 -0019 1 f 00 0800 0400 O f 00 oleo17-29-22-44-0020 1.00 0.00 0000 00 00 0.00 17 29-22-44-002 1 1.00 Of 0o 0. 00 Of 00 oleo17-29-22-44-0022 100000 0.00 0f O0 01000 0800 17-- E3- 22--44 -0023 0800 31244v00 0.00 L'f 00 08 00 17-29-22-44- 0053 01100 4526 x 00 0000 0800 0.00 17- 29- 22--44 -0094 0.00 4616.00 0000 0f O0 0900 17- 29- -E2 -44 -0055 0.00 4616.00 0800 0000 Of 00. 17-29-22-44-0096 oleo 4756 w 00 oleo O f oo 0 f 00 17- 29 -22 -44 -0097 0600 4586.00 0.00 0000 0400 0.00 4616.00 0f 00 0400 0600 17-29-22-44-0099 0200 4616.00 0000 0100 0f 00 17- -E9- 2 --44 -010 + 01000 4756.00 0000 0.00 oleo 17- 89 -E2 -44 -0101 0000 4481.00 0f 00 0.00 0800 17-29-22-44-0 1 L02 0,800 4596.00 - 0000 0800 o v oo 17 -29 -22-44 -0103 0.00 4 741.00 0000 0000 00 00 17- 29-22-44 -0104 O.00 4461.00 oleo 0.00 080017-29-22-44-0105 0000 4586.00 0000 0000 0f O0 PHUt 11 U 10-04-1989 D/P NO, 6016 DUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM SEWER (RL-RM) UNITS COL. R) STRM SEW (RH-COMM) SF COL. 3) = 'STRM SEW (CEMETARY/PARKS) SF COL. 4 - STREET RL-RM') - UNIT COL. 5) STREET ALL OTHERS) - FF PI N NOIN COL I COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 17-29-22-44-0106 Olt 00 4616vOO emoo 0800 oloo 17-29-22-44-0107 0., 00 461-6*00 onoo 0800 08,00 17-29-22-44-0108 Q. 00 4756,00 oleo emoo 0900 17-29-22-44-0109 omoo 4481,,00 04.00 00 00 0800 17-29 -22-44-01110 0800 4596,00 01000 08,00 oloo 17-29-22-44-0111 0000 474loOO 0000 0. 00 0000 17-2.9-22-44-0112 0000 4481o00 0.00 onoo 0000 17-2.9-22-44-0113 0000 4506,00 0. 00 0900 0800 17-29-22-44-0114 On o@ 4616200 0000 0000 0w00 17-29-22-44-0115 on 00 46.16m.00 oleo 0000 0000 17-29-4222-44-0116 61600 4726xOO 0800 0200 0100 17-29-22-44-0117 oleo 4506.00 oleo on -00 oloo 17-29-22-44-0118 0106 4616000 onoo 0200 0600 17-29-22-44-0119 ooze 4616.00 0000 owft 0000 17-29-22-44-0120 01000 4726g,00 0800 0800 oloo @Soo 4481800 01000 01.00 oloo 17- -29 -22- 44'0.122 10000 4596,00 oleo 0000 0000 17-.29-22-44-0123 4741.00 oleo 0000 0100 17-29-28-44-0124 0100 0000 4481,00 oleo 0000 0l00 . 17-29-22-44-0125 oleo 4481,,00 0800 oleo o. o0 1'7-29-22-44-0126 oleo 4596o00 0000 oleo 0800 4741o00 0100 0000 oloo 17-29-22-44-0128 0 0 00 4481o00 0800 0000 0400 1'7-29- IE2- 44-0129 oleo 4526,00 0800 0000 0800 17-29-22-44-0130 oleo 4616,00 oleo onoo 00,0 17-29-22-44-0131 e. o0 4616.00 oleo oleo O. o0 17-2-19-22-44-0132 0,000 4726,00 oleo @moo oloo 17-29-22-44-0133 oleo 4481oOO oleo @moo 0000 17-29-22-44-0134 0000 4886,00 0000 oleo 0. 00 17-29-22-44-ZI35 oleo 4741o00 0.00 0800 0000 17-29-22-44-0136 0000 4481,00 0000 0600 0800 17-0-9-22-44-0137 oleo 4506, 00 oleo oleo oleo 17-29-22-44-0138 0,500 4616sOO 0900 0900 0.00 17-29-22-44-01 9 0000 46166 O0 oleo 0000 oleo 17--9 -22-44 -0140 Ono@ 47226v00 @woo oleo 0800 17-29-22-44-0141 0000 4506a,00 e. 00 0200 0.00 17-29-22-44-0142 oleo 4616,00 oleo oleo 0900 17-29-22-44-0143 0000 4616a,00 04,00 0000 oleo 17-29-22-44-0144 @goo 4726nOO oleo 06,00 oloo 17-29-22-44-0145 onoo 4481o00 0. e0 0800 0600 17-29-22--44-0146 oleo 4886n00 oleo 0000 01,00 17-.29-22-44-0147 @moo 4741oOO @w 00 0.00 0800 17-29-22-44-0148 oleo 4481,00 0800 onoo oloo 1,8-29-22-14-0007 oleo 30744,00 0000 08,00 190800 18-29-2.2-14-0008 0000 01000 onoo oleo 234,80 18- 29 -22 -41 -0001 Imoo. ov 00 @goo 1600 oleo 18-29-22-41-0002 Igoe @woo 0000 1900 0.00 113-29-22-41-0003 0000 oleo Igoe 0800 18-29-2.2-41-0004 Igoe 01,00 0400 Igoe oloo 1B-29-22-41-0005 Igoe oloo @. ego 1 goe 0800 PROJECT Na. 89--03 EDGERI -UN/ ROSELAWN IMP PH 1 ( P ) QUANTITY .CHECK LIST PAGE 12 OF 10-04-1989 COL. 1 _NORM SEWER I RL --RM) - UNITS COL. 2 3 - ST RM SEW RH -COMM) -- SF COL. 3 3 = STRM SEW CEMETARYIP ARKS) SF COL, 4) ' (RL— RM ) - UNIT COL. 5) = STREET GALL OTHERS) - FF PIN MC. COL I COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 ia SO 13,00 0000 00 00 182 3- -41- 7 1, 0, W11 es, @a 0000 0800 0400 s Y es eia coo Vr oV o. eV 18- 29 -22 -41 -0009 1.600 QR. 00 o. eo 0000 0000 18-29-22 * 4 1 -100 10 1000 o. eo O. eo 0000 0.00 o. eo @goo 0200 or 00 o. 00 @. o @. oo 18-29-22-41-0013 1 r 00 6808 @• oo on 00 18- E9- -E2 -41 --0014 1 s 00 0 a '00 o. ft @. oo oleo 18-- 29 -22- 41- -0015 1 a--2S -- 22 ? --fit 1- -0015 oleo o l eo 1000 18- 2S- GL--41 -0017 22 1 0.0 i t i . IL s o 1 8--29 -41- 0018 1.00 0900 o. 00 0000 o. eo 18-29-22-41-10019 1.00 0000 0000 Qt. oo 18-29-22-41-0020 @r oo 0000 o. oil 18- 23 -22 -41 -0021 e. oo 241022a.00 of oo @r oo o. eo GRAND TOTALS 535, 0:0 2285820.00 4378802.00 62m00 4558.35 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FORPUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS., the city engineer +,or the City of Maplewood has been author *,zed and directed to prepare a report with re+erence to the improvement of Rosel awn Avenue from Arcade Street to Interstate 35E,1 City Project .89-03, by construction o+ bituminous Street with concrete curb and gutter, s,idewalk,, storm sewer, water main, and sanitary sewer reconstruction together with trunk storm sewer outf al I to serve area roughl V bounded by Larpenteur Ave*nue,, Arcade Street,, County Road B, and Interstate 35E9 and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described.: NOW ,9 THEREFORE9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA9 as follows: is The report. of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed 'improvement on Rosel awn Avenue from Arcade Street to Interstate 35E., City Project 89-03, by construction of bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk 9 storm sewer,, water main,, and sanitary sewer reconstruction together with trunk storm sewer out fall. to serve area roughly bounded by Larpenteur Avenue, Arcade Street, County Road B, and Interstate 35E is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2u The council Will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for al I or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,252,400a 3,o A public hearing wil I be held at Edgerton School at 1929 Edgerton Street on Thursday, the 16th day of November 9 1989, at 7 pm. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. A G E N D A R E P 0 R T TO: Mayor and City Council membersmembers FROM: City Manager RE :' Council Meetin g Date's for Balance of 1989 DATE: October 17 1989 AGENDA NO. Action by Council, a4 End orsed Mod1f oa Re j coed Date The following re the d • g, dates for Council Meetings that areWeshouldreviewthesedatesand currently scheduled. add or delete: Monday October 23, 1989 7.00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting Thursday October 26, 1989 4. • 30 p.m. Regular Council Meeting Monday October 30 1988 4.30 p.m. Council/Managerg Meetin g Monday November 13, 1989 7. • 00 p.m. Regular Council Meeting Thursday November 16 1989 40. 30 p.m. Regular Councilgncl Meeting Monday November 27 19.89 7.00 p.m. Regular Councilg Meeting Thursday November 30, 1989 4.30 p.m. Regular Council Meeting Monday December 11, 1989 7•Q0 p.m. Regular Council Meetin g Thursday December 14, 1988 4.30 p•m. Regular Council Meeting Monday December 25, 1989 No Meeting - Holiday Thursday December 28, 1989 4.-30 p.m. Regular Council Meeting rj AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael • M Action by CounallM. From McGuire Chief of Policece Kenneth U. Collins. Subject: Request For Stop Endorsed,...... Date: n Ci ty Hei ghts Dri ve & Summer 'o 1eOctober16, 1989 eoe Introduction Residents in the area of City Heights • a stop ghts Drive and Summer have requested thatpsignbeplacedacedinthissarea, The request t approximately 15 young q t is being made becauseygschoolchildrenwaitfortheschoolbusalocation, t this Mrs. Tom Carl strom, 1828 Onacre st Curve, presented the attached etitionsignedbyarearesidentssupportinghela p Heights Drive at Summer, g p cement of a stop sign on City Background Our records reveal that there have been no accidents at this intersectionorinthisimmediateareaduringtheastthreeeyears. Recommendation This matter be reviewed and sent to the City Council for action. Action The City Council review this matter and approve placement of a St signonCityHeightsatSummer, p g KVC: j s i n c..; t a 11 e d a t t. h e i. n t e I,,- c I: i. o ri t: ';f 1•1 e.i. g h c; n c u fn fn e I c.. t r e e s J g hi t. is eM 'at p 1. e V.j o c:I cl c t. o 1::) 1:.-1 Ji. n g t. 1--i e t I--- a f f i. c c-) 1-1 C.' J. t. V-1 b --.- r C) I 4t Ile4 ' el 23 vq- 3e 74 Opp) .' IN, 911 q o SOF5CTPI - oa " 1-7 &T . 7?7. 6 F 1 OcAl-\ Cl 5 9. --oelg cP 9 c76 177o< c-:' ) e p t e fn b e r 21 , l. I:? E *3 ':/:' VJ e t..t 1" . I cl r f.: w cl ut 5 g nja i. ri s-i t 1. 1. e cl at t t. 1--i c--.! n A: e I*-* fzi e c..: i. c) ri f ldeli.gl--ftss zand Sum-if-ler- i rl IVI a 1.-) 1. e V%l c:I c-) d 1: 0 Fleight.ii-ii 1:3 e -f c) r i. t ervl-Hrs. si t. r-- e e J'c v 589 17 3 q) 1,3 I ...... ........ ........ 117 7 1 l v Oncti.c.r 0 Rek-0/es 7—e-10 0Iff or 7 4 P C'n CLCI• -ems"- ti: 7z 7 C ^e'iiRd7 CCGt C& F'l...# C) I'-,I E ygv' -d-a ( S y a 6 y 5 6 /-., 3 Yes 1-5Z-, 51,3 y -q- 3 1u3 261 6 X33 y'9 -9.s 7 Cl C) We, -t.-. Vi e (::I r- 1: 1 cl I.J. I.... z-t g r' e e e t'' (::-) u( e e zt, p g rli. g n e (I f- (m I- c-1. J.n j. r:) j t 1y .1 13ns A 11. e c-1 at tl ... I i I r- e c:-! e • o r- Jf:.i ri C' i.y) v I ... I e i. g In -t.*. F-: J. rl a p 1. e w c-) d s t c-i I.:-) ri g t 1--i e I: r-- {-x f Jl. c. 1% ENAMEPHC11H. I ........... .......... I ..... ... . ......................... el 00 Wt4Ae 70if 5 k;)3 o q S'GG 1. r : .mac.. ' r f 4 9,6 16 0000, loona000 It 9 0 41C St as 7Y 17 September 24, 1989 We the undersigned, agree we would like to see a stop sign ins.alled at the intersection of City Heights and Summer streets in -Maplewood, stopping the traffic on Heights before it enters onto Gummer street. NAME' PHDNE aA4 (4 v 3 og 7 E v wto vL e,.,e lle- 6 ^- IfL16, j. 1.:-) Tc -17Z PjP 3 7 0 4-8 8 15. ol - Mae 17. rs 5r(4 -\ 19. - 20. 0epI: e fri t) e- r "s2: 1. J. 9 c.- t o e e at s. g r) W r) cl e F.. J. g I ... I (A ....a g I,,-- e vi v.4 t..t I cl i. r1 i:.; '# . a 1. 1. e c I at of F-leigintiis ourid S t..t fn rn e r- t r 2 2 t s o r e tf:) tA) C i. ... j s t ci 1::) 1:7).J. n g t 1--i e t. I---- a f -1": J. c-) n C.' i t. I e i. g h tX - u (n fn e I,- I-*-- e enteI..- s c) n t o tvc , ,q , a, y T., -d v r- Jig fi CAA X_. U I -3 1„ a. -+h H-6 T7/ q7 C ; + H e j`, h r `t i' `i - `I 7 E o 1 tis N yd9- S3 `!z 5 It. 41- Ll 3 7 leg I. C) l2n t C Qtcfc atit / )73OC' -%l e i. 6 1736 0 1. C.? la mm 1 8 -7 g . S ya9 -ion y8 si8/ l l ' I 0 `rd p t fn b e r- g r e t (::-j i:.; e e a t (.-j pt1--i e ut I.-I (I e I e (A ..k g r" e e V%1 e V-11 C:) LWe tt (n (n e I s . I, e t IsnofC' i t. y I ... I e J. g h t:. s-.- a n -tinis. t a 1. 1. e d a t t h e i. n I: e I .i e c: t i. c. ... ... • W % a p 1. (.-! w (::-.I c). st.cipp).-ing t1--Ie CM FI e J. g h t. 1-.:, "r,, c) r ervt.er-is oritc) ":-3uumner nJ 0 to r woo to OUAt 17q qc J is 00 lab OAO. 1t_qk)0/. e", 7 7 3 .4 3 ii qrp_ 0 92 • r„ tVa. 6m, re 983 J. 771-3S1s3 Ul '- ,' i -7 CCn rvhUv lu f/- to f3 a ul dal . crcr a t ?,e. vir, / -P9a 170 1 to to -4 /Jw to ..- .., -.t j;'a -5 l j ,(ems i° >` 2 (' to y88- d AGENDA ITEM Chief Collins is at Conference and will present this at the me Action by Council eting. Endorsed,,,.... Modif Rej ected,-... Date