Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 03-26 600 CMW Street ReconstructionAGENDA CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP Monday March 26, 2007 Council Chambers, City Hall 6:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA D. NEW BUSINESS E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Street Reconstruction Program F. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer SUBJECT: Street Reconstruction Program Report Council — Manager Work Shop DATE: March 20, 2007 INTRODUCTION /SUMMARY On January 8, 2007, the engineering staff presented a power point presentation (see attached printout) that detailed the current state of the City's Street Reconstruction Program. At that workshop, the City Council requested a review of the continuing years of the program. This presentation will focus on the status of our current streets within the City and report on the plans for the next 5 -6 years of the program. Options for continuing with the current or accelerated programs will be discussed. No action is proposed for this item. Background The City of Maplewood has an estimated value of over $106,000,000 in our streets. This is just for the pavement, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and medians. The remaining utilities for sewer, storm sewer and water main add additional value to the city's system. The value assumes that many streets have far exceeded their useful life. The replacement cost of our entire 132+ miles of streets is $235 million. Typically the annual street maintenance and reconstruction program should be in a range of 3 -5% of the replacement value of the street replacement costs. Thus, Maplewood should be expending $7.0 - $10.0 million to protect our street investment. In 2006, that investment was nearly $6.5 million, in the 5 t " year of a 10 -year accelerated construction program to make -up for a lack of investment in the 1990's. The City currently has 47.71 miles of streets (36 %) that are rated below a 50 on our 100 -point rating scale. A 50 rating or below typically requires a partial or full reconstruction to provide the pavement in an acceptable driving level and to establish a 35 -year to 50 -year life, consistent with our program. In previous years (2002 to 2006) we average 3.4 miles of street reconstructed per year. At that rate of reconstruction (3.4 miles per year) it would take 14 years to address all of the City's streets rated below 50. During that 14 year period, it is likely that another 7 -10 miles of streets would deteriorate into the below 50 range. Staff has prepared a proposed list of streets for the next 5 -6 years for consideration, and for the Council to identify how a program might work. The actual approval of which streets and the determination of the actual investment is normally completed as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process. The proposed plan anticipates an average reconstruction program of 5.64 miles per year with an average investment of nearly $10.0 million per year. For comparison, the City is proposing to invest the following into streets programs in 2007: Desoto Area Streets: $5,600,000 ($1,350,000 in G.O. Bond) Brookview Area Streets: $3,200,000 ($900,000 in G.O. Bond) Total 2007 Investment: $8,800,000 The 2007 Program provides the City the opportunity to continue the advanced street program but will require that the City increase the debt service levy by $194,000 in 2007 to cover the increase in bonded indebtedness. This is consistent with the CIP program adopted by the City Council in 2005. Budget Impact As noted above, it is anticipated that the City will need to increase the debt service levy by $194,000 in 2007 to cover the bonded indebtedness created by the Desoto and Brookview projects. The attached advanced program (2008 — 2013 Street Rehabilitation Plan) would likely require an annual increase in the debt service plan by approximately $40,000 - $50,000 per year. Thus, beginning with the 2009 budget (adopted during calendar year 2008), the City would likely need to dedicate an increase in the debt levy of $234,000 - $244,000 ($194,000 + $40,000 - $50,000). Beginning in 2012 or 2013, the City's debt levy would stabilize and likely not require an increase, although the difficulty in projecting construction costs, bonded debt and interest rates is difficult out 5 -6 years. It is noted that in 2007, an increase of $194,000 was a 1.3% increase in the City's levy. It should be noted that MnDOT is now estimating that their Street Construction Cost Index has jumped by 12.8% in 2005 and 17.4% in 2006, meaning that projects just 3 years ago were over 30% cheaper than under today's construction costs. While this large cost increase may stabilize, the expense to the City will potentially continue to grow. The option to continue the program at current levels (maintaining the annual increase in debt levy to bonded debt of $194,000), would require a decrease in the proposed projects in 2008 from the 4.91 miles identified. We likely would need to delay the projects at Myrtle /Sterling /Idaho and at Pond /Dorland since they are the highest average rated streets. These would be delayed until 2009, with the Beam Avenue and Carsgrove Meadows area streets delayed from 2009 to 2010; and finally, the 2010 shown program would be delayed until 2011. A third option to consider is to hold debt service at the current levels. With some debt being retired, the shown program could probably be implemented at about 33 — 50% of that shown. Thus we would implement a portion of the shown 2008 program and move the remainder to 2009. Then 40% of the 2009 program would go to 2010; with another 40% going to 2011, etc. Additional impacts will be felt on our advanced program under the MSAS account. This advanced analysis assumed that there was a substantial increase in the gas -tax, wheelage allowance, license tab fees or some other combination of funds into our account. These items are being considered at the Minnesota Legislature in this year's session. Additionally, some adjustments will need to be made to support this program in the WAC Fund, bonding and fee adjustment in the ELIF Fund with only minor adjustments in the Sanitary Sewer Fund. RECOMMENDATION No action is required on this item. It is provided as information for Council to understand the current situation with our Streets Program. The Council may wish to provide some direction on additional information as part of preparation of the annual Capital Improvement Plan and as considerations begin for allocating funds for the 2008 budget. Attachments: 1. January 8, 2007 Power Point Slides 2. 2008 — 2013 Street Rehabilitation Plan 3. 2008 — 2013 Street Improvement Plan Map 4. Analysis Sheets of 2008 — 2013 Streets Program 2 K 2008 - 2013 Street Rehabilitation Plan Cost Surrimary 70, W, 11."in, — - tUMduo !Lm!k LOMIIAM Stale A, it WAC BA S,.., LN.Irry Asic N ffit"Is 2008 Tow! trar ;all Projects in 4.91 $10,660,000 $3,759,200 $194,000 $88,300 $589,000 $371, 100 $2,390.900 $3,267.500 31% 2009 Intel to, fill Projects in 5.57 59.561,740 S1,933,200 S456,500 5103,000 5 I.083J40 $695,900 S2 489M $219%500 29% 2010 . rramr for car Projects in 5.67 $ 10,390,000 $ 2,849,000 $ 730,500 $ 234,500 $ 701,000 $ IA9,600 $ 2,385,900 $ 2,199 21% 201`1 Tou Pat so Projects in 5,52 $ 113,380M0 $ 2,750A00 $ 202,000 $ 260,910 $ 409,000 S 492,000 $ 3,686,100 5 2,347.000 0.23 Toisl I-, all Projects if, 5.59. $ 9,770,000 $ 49s.000 $ 293,100 S 293,100 $ P)6,000 $ 496,000 $ 4,956,900 $ 2.533,000 0.26 20 . Total for MI Projects it) 6.61 S 11,260.000 $ 1,287,300 $ 337,800 $ 337,800 $ 571,000 $ 571 000 $ 5,382,500 $ 3, 110,000 0,28 3187 $ 62,021.740 $ 13,574300 5 2,214,200 $ 1,317,610 $ 3,924,740 If 3,415,600 $ 21,292,300 $ 16,256,500 0.26 SA4 S 10336,957 $ 2,262,383 $ 369,033 $ 219,602 S 664,957 $ 652,600 S 3,548117 5 2.709,417 26115 ........................................................................................ ................................................................................................ . ..................................................................................... . .. . . . ....... 11-J 1..!:'GL.`7A`L.) ...... .. .... VA CINlI' • Ili ICA-• 7 7 T !;l T 1 W V 'Al A A . IW O A E 70 v Hy w i 0 0 11MAC '177 1 tin I'Alm 1 IVA al STREIFTINDEEX sit" % A I I RAl I CA I AM AWE K I AAA A On WIN .,r. 3 D: 1: COMMON! Am 1 14 Ma"HAt 1 1 ID AI AIA A I o [I; I, 011,NNIN nI, 11 1 EIIIIIAC1 ili� 1 N am, LI ;my n) j 4 CA RUTH A 11 .% A. NKMAMHA AN, • I In N&I I 1 1 1, 1, 1 At) If I hCp2jqqHqq j ,"AlKAYliNHI �n t: 4, o, (o 1 4 MIAMNA AM I Y MAI Ii. PIA, AM I & I A MMWA ON i &JANA: ' , I a I A WAA I A N N C­ I K IN A 2 1 % 10 ASMON: M . K, . 1 0 1 1 � :,.nld': CAI A 10 A I (XII AT fl. L"I ci qtjuRC "! t . Y tl (l RIYANDVII W AVE. 11 4 M'"IT A9 K V l, If � l^8. K I T its AII I CNAOI p 1 ,1 n AAA 1 !1,', K 1 (AAOf.N I G 6 NAMMM AT K W-1001 10 A 1, YAjRIaY En. A II mom AW n 'A lmliii ISWUNHAM MD I i il, J a HACAIN OIC I; Al IN 10"WHI17t1 WAY 9M) n I WHAW ul K I IIAIEICY t: E. 1, VO INO, MY 14HMCW AT u, C, D h "MIFE IN I A) laiNvah I N G, 11. I, (I HA DIN AVE it -o OAK &Its K I 16 HE , I I - If, I ARMAH u AM k" lu ~ lullow, 1 1 K i i - IvINICNGHAA G As N� I HAW[HOMA AVE;, I Is (CAKMIJr-1. 1:.1, 1 If, riuk"Cull It H 3 1 JUI I. Al I 4, R IsAKRIDGI Dis K D, "INCISM AW A It IPA I Ai 91 6 DWRMA IN A In 1 1 3; 1. A 'A C 1, h I Pill WMI IN. OVA i 1 01MY (W I K BIWAC AM C L In mumn AVE d', MM LIA I lo HIMIN I To K I III WNIWCAY IR RNm) 'j 1 s, M It, ill 1 IT Hwou , v K I III NIJHY Ill" I: � 4 10 ,vwvn AT P A MMA IN A 1% "1 AM T p I. UJINW, J, I Y NOW AM GuRy MIACIGM LAW R II 1 IRA WW CA Q I M IMMIHIA OTAN ON fa DICK' It IMAMY UH, HMO AT A K Q H 0 Iwo MCAM no c 10110 OR I !A HMO KIN o TI I I LIH 1, I. 1 PNM M • K, I W QANKT1 W 1.1. K 1 111M I KAtOWAY AVE, J, K" f, PAMUII As I W K IN TI %of 10 1 IOWA 0) c I 1 1 lwwwo I K ° I pKIF1 MIAMI •I j K h PAWNS AT, D C 5, L MAN RD I lu 1 1 "umm 14 K 1 11 1 prompit ri fd 1 'WHY 19-AW, IV, I I INDTIN RIC K, 1 12 tAIYC 1�� A K 16 ON14SHAI If I7 I I HIMIM"M LA 40 it "Vi. I I IN IIIIA AVE, K POND) Ad IJ I In MoCIONT Ol. in :: .A... 1 � a(I 1 HMO) AVE. I It 4, !o 6 V, ID Av' I I .Cl As 1111 1:1 G Al I'tionflMly Nk SAY W 4,0WOM100wi V I IT 41 6 A 11 C MA T� NY AM 1 8 INW; ME I, AH vm"WA AM A I M 0 AN CAN fol �Illln:Nlo t iJ I< , JNTAIN '.,1,. A Z b MR A" NINO ON nmKIM, W A I JAMIn DR, I I A RK1 SI A 0, 1, 1 IN I 1 1Rvv I J I 3l 57 1; R W"Y WE, Q 6 L A K 6 10 10 001 ON 11 AN WWI E a NOVI AV( It V, VJN(!I1M1 AN MAA I MEN AlA A, lo t:, It .; ,masl:n Al'! 1 3 flf., I CIA llk*Y 2, H n "AflAnD t: 1 5 As NNARI C NT. i , j 10 G DOTH Id PH � AWCA A AT CA CAYECko III N' D 4 RUN N.VVI q ' E ,-q AA IL 1 4 IT WMB DK I D 4, 1, -51 1 1 MAXIMO OR W 6 ww"Arim AM ONO 1 1 "KASHMOW 4N I I mbill I IT 'IANDIRAVd AN, o, Jt .1 W t . . AI I , KNI AAA. K In 030DI DR. K IV -: IJV471 kC K I is Imudom AN A, Q A & K u VOW I N DR. K I �1 It . . IV { AI.., h IT I.o IN, KNOIA (AR i R 'CIAMI ';I. if C It 17, Its ClMm I ININAY L: Y NVIR!" W A I Ill A v, QNC: + Wuwv qw� IV I It, K(oil M G 1 AN AV , 1 . AXIMAI AM 4 A 0 &No Vk K I/ MIYUMAN I& f V MARMN WI:. 4 r 4 "Mm ',C K C 0 1,110 IMN i N 'A iRYC R AVE AS" MAN AR D, 0 in k a h� Y CIII , p. I `it Ili Is H yy d I ACd RIMY C !H lat '�I 1 1 L. WAVY R, C to I I WI WWD DR is I , N 1, T yj SNOW)DIC I OH Pie, K IC It), IV I, in ANIMIM of .AR V K . I / 3,ik d,*0A DO N b AMT10 M INSCA IAM n K 11 1AXI MKIII ch K 11 SNOM AT. K;,:, , 1 EARN AfIF I:, i. ll. I 1 11 S(IIJOK.RiSi K, I 1,H If H vi) I Il !ANDINI[HR AVE, A I{} fl,. ( 11) 1 1, !ojIIICflACNt4 DR, II I IN I A ISMI Ad I, II �Y "WIT p D 4 "MRI RANIC DR MV ,1 1 13 Imam NO 0 G, L J A. !. Wa mom WM vv) F I I In 1H or, D n %MMMH uf?. 4 W 0 •6 H I MA: ND 1-4 4mmmA mr K G V I, I f GAIN WAR. K 4 L V, IN It 11 IA IM N KIR 00 CL F =W CFO No" Ad Q n INNN IM "'DmAmoll CA I A E I > I tWWAM, AN. K, L 1 6 %hump hK , 4 pm ! ..'t I NWAKI I I K 11 Sp M SO A 0 1 V " T If, I o 1411"i A 1 1, 5 In A MINDIA IN to I im 1 111 :4) HIM, R kWh MA K, I is A h (ANN Is AT .)DIA AT �IIWAQR EV I I 1q TIN 1N A41111, U 1 MINE H NO I E Hn it MMUH A AN K N SIMMOR Lb I. MEAA• I;! K It 1 ACtAMI k I N D'Ad) �AJMMII C:I, lk��IHI'i A !j , 1, NIMIAND RD K 101 TINIM cl I,qam, ivv: �i I DC MAMA AT I K 4 MMICM I Wnt-1,: A` . .. , D, 6 NPI'll HQI', NN if G %OWN 3, A b MAHi ( TI AC AT I I MAIN!) I I �D 'Ji MA!"WHK DR. k 1, 5 1 10 6 u MAPS M No E �Qn .I Ill MARYINILI AN I "am UL 111[':A :N AM t� If ST K I! _I I in Ik Is MIAMI M K MON Ill IA, I A, I MAIMIL A WHIR MIK K Il MMY E I TWRR cl 4 1 1 Il. 11, It MAI I,' LN K I I 11 ANDY IN K K 1 MANY Ill, t Q IN AMR MIDN M AC iJ Ef C :l; I, MARY 'd. K 1, C 9 V , Mh , I MARY! MA) F e�, 1 Is am MY WA AT I I A I I MARMN0 1 ME H 5, 6 Y vow M K 11' wo MAIHMMM DR K I! A YI Pas Projects: Year: Project Type: Total Cost Length lno: Yelir. Cost'arlas, 2003 2004 200 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201 - 1 2012 2013 6R4 -q% 2 5 2 S2 G Q 0 $4C4 M9 -4 2.5% 2,5% 216 24,0% 3.0% 3.0% 3A% 310% 3.0% 3.0% 3,0lia T: se q:v, nr% _v n -3 - 2 4 2�, - 4'. k83 4, 1 n 4v', 22 r Average CostWive for Pavement Replacement Projects: 393.000 403 413.000 423.000 434,000 445,000 4515,000 467.000 479,000 491,000 $0,000 ?2 A� raa-a�dl`nv m C -,, J r mv rr oF c b-� 20 -4 7 24 7 1 2 �2 M i 1 -r��x P.5 q 71c� rs, I �-E; �g 54 1 F, CA c . Haze. R-l� C A�e� 1 9 4 � y - 13 -c leaccns:�, r2 Z)- 62,P .3� U ti s .,4 c � 7M a Q , - 91 t�- !'a U 4 2 6 2 4 T, �l 1A 1�,4 43� . 1 4 2 13 5 4RA- 713 511 ,"`^: c'7:2 - .;i a . Nln �, 2CGS ..oz.F-O 2 - nin --5fi IIT - ­�., e3s Ig�.� I-� - a !,4 s-32 � .4 1 ,4 7 e 9 WO r , 6�, -64 - 61� a In Kenwoo Are S -Ca� Pl,Ccnv! S" 'c"O 1 4 in 2,X 4 a� -- 1� �a No I 4z �-c 4�,7 A � 2 1 SE , 588 6K li Aec is I 1 - 35 - "'44 . ;V�7 Average ClistWoo for Local Reconstruction Projects: 1.171826 1,134,379 1,136,233 1,417,875 1460,411 1.504,224 1,549.330 1,595.831 3,643,706 1,693,017 1,743,807 Hazervo Slein 2 S! �a 0-- C wu. 3 81� "It :5 9YO 6 - 1 4S7- 7 - j 2� 170 3 , - j 42 _7 r, 565, 1 - 0 , , � 7 04.23 , 5 r y- - G 0 62A ni - St ee� U h:22 e.0O2 m. e 4n S SIaI� I` 2, .-;l`: 52 C % 23C2 2: 8 0 __ 20 - 5 7, _g 2 A 1 --, S 2 `.`i�' 7 9�'� '2 ��7 26C 3,48' '314 1585444 3,693 0� 3 6 � -19 4 C - I ��P-A 4 �9' 1 83 4 n C, 0 Z Ad 5 4 1 2S! C 50 . M 3 1, 5 nZ q 1 5 9 647 - 1 S �,3 - - , -8 z 3 6�,4 4 1 IS 3 23g - H s 6 2 4 585 34 1 r, 4 c-I 7 474 4 95 . 5 1111 85 Hazercocn Snee- �I-lr - a J $1 Tr, = : 4 4 --- C 5C 20 04 - 2 15' 48-, I .... :4v. 7 r .11 1 1 C� 'A TO IT 4� Tv U 1 ,4EC 537 a - n 2,, -64 I.5F1 1 4 1 1 el Ile* 1 Ed& "j ' 1 1 6 9F 623 Sce! 3" e - V3 S�am A'd $ OCUO C, - 2 1 10s - n n" n a 2 830. 01 5cq - 4 4 7E- I �ca 0- r 4, 732 4 1.6,9y2 4 2 3 1 6-0 �5 Average CorayMile for Are : re A is Rocca once, than Prosto to 3,190,965 2,721,991 2.798,032 3,4f9,560 3,573,647 1680,8515 3,864.899 3,981.521 4,060,560 puloom 4 For Budgeting purposes use for GIFT In orovernent Tyne & Proiect Cost I We S',a-a Ar�, Rec PA.�.'a lreccnct on ..4w 8 Cie :Oi "o q are Re'v,!e 2003 2004 2006 2006 $221c,GOr- il 2 2 P 6 On, 0 Z2,a 5is' S " 4", OTO S � 230 CUM S 2,36 O'C $1 213 1382 $1 490 j0O 1 , .. -. S S r -I VOO Sa c 21M, 6R4 -q% 2 5 2 S2 G Q 0 $4C4 M9 -4 2007 2 2008 2 2009 2010 , aly-, Cn� 1 - -3 6?� �n S S� 8'Tr :� T Z7ZI CC al 15 40 N N P P 03n OM S Si UK ng", OM 1 , .. -. S S u 2011 2012 2013 n S-1 3 n Z S "O,O-D V 7K-OnQ S 1 . R-4 C I T- S' Q3000 $ ', 00 Sl - 9c,0 0 3 - .2 2008 Proposed Street Improvements White Bear Avenue...Radatz to Sworkle ................................................... ........................ . ......................................... . . . . . ........ � ii�Bisdxo Bre, A -ora," "W, PCs Is, Base Bear A -no. 7.. AM 0.84 Nil Rocon., (State Add X, 0.99 ts.330,00) Idi'lWArel Seeded so so 41 51jaw ;.Orgill, Ladish Cimil, FQmdsn Pircilect - Streets PCi Ew NIUM EIROW Mr.. Total Cost state Aid rA&q kiki! iTIBILMSY is- La" 61 Ferndale, Me Ian t Still ter Road I Ai AwO,Akr "sr PO fee Fasoiak, Sam: 34 1.6se Sic oafted FelcorlAr - (State Aid) sf,lnodo 0.30 534{1. S241sed $0 $0 $o $13,600 . .. .. ....... ...... FemdaleiGernalum Area Streets ;- _S In i $ n t4 is nwl r Rf^o,n X3 eo Si it sl ss $4 4,-C a p. �e t� r, de R­m­.n,,bt i Uw nx sk�00 �2 &if 3. n $ i e­Q $so 5 $S4 An,l Ue'an .xi Ave e 4 llqi­r,Ln1 z OX SA 00' U. 40 z 831 -2 Sol i S3 2_1 S i 9 Sly Sj,, �A� .0t Gwan, .r Are,... 5- ,4 ra! e: S22 iSO �4 4r, _S 2n sal s, n �V Gwslon S1 a.", MR t -------- Pil�o� - ent FIPPA.—,ni S=: 7 0 ;Sf SF S csio Sc ' S l $2 , $16 W 3 S23 is S32 4 i s® A verag. a par PIP for Pendafel aium Prqpis. 35:2 4SM AS G F.W.,11.1 Recurs : Rd" Replace: 0.88 $ MS000 $207,000 $34,400 $20,650 $ 294COG U% MBtte1SteflurS,?Idakc, klyme Sit t-In S Se ctn Q 2" $4 -00 U� 1 5 i s SM ar.j $ i 3orcn 3" c $1, 5&J 54' -X, 'K 3DI ,I S dr 5143, 0 5 N ldaftAs n,n S'S S sp is F0 Re_r­�_, .-h 3 � 54S S�e� U S ' 000 Sft $A $ IS M' $ r. F ".0 i - s ".1-010% ' , A .. . # Aides Fen for MunlaBderriolg1dat-spikovay elect. SiY 3,7$5 S74 - - - - Full Revonst�e d-ocall - --- ------------------- Sea $1,170,001 $0 $36,100 $G $0 A"See $701aw ZYA LarkAdros rii Burke Area Streets I ls�-,e Aid 'M-mi4 RC ­v ;.o 26 5 e 54S n le ""n srr SQ n See C% .0v 5, 1 g ""i 17 y 1 2 B6 Ana Rj 2 1 � i See Veil We V� 51, 4GO $5 '13.2 See Sin sli 2S' $lip i1i V-� OW 'n" Ker-d !s la !ic i =W:� 5 i See Je,' so Ti -0c slos A $:�i xi $3U_X 3` �e, r �e­ i. S: 5- Mo nnS ce , $5 $3 -Mo M 03�� er,51- e 71%n SSi Me n- r "1 -2 W K-3 cer 7 2c"I 14 b'S Vic CQ-1 $v,6-0 1 5 t 0 40 s i n , e r t� .2 av* Rd S� S� ilpt,il. st 7� CSP K S 5 �! Ole. S -, szr U.= iai,ne Rd S.58 11 5&3 ift2 1 5 1 i SO sZc OX sr . Q 1 7 701 "i Coe, _86, A- 2F� 1302 2s% od'S's-i n 26 S4','� Snn S� SA2 V-111 �F A�_, Ste 3- S 123, OdC lA S2 C:X $-4 K, $ �3 ol3 V3 Rin�o%!N,Zl 5en $ � K _r, 54 in r Ode 1x:4 -2 S I see SU 0S S $21 i DI , o 'i­ in a42 ...... - ------ - 51 5ss. ie S Je_ r -t i -0 WX Sir ri S� J� 2i M Alverage indst PC? for A," prisiedr: 31,3 8;m 9.83 Fee Rocoostruct. ISS - - ----------------- SZOSSOM so $MUO $58,050 $382SW S106,400 $1.235,760 $7sedw awo FrondtDortand A­ -,u 7§i n " A rsim $4 r•c)Q Se3 n i .4, 2 ie: Re Pa�! Rlitsl­­ t Z1.0 in E; A; sli S <iQ S-9 A"'i) lie r-. i 4 � 0 A,,elap, ermt, PCa tee PoosTemland Foldeir: Pa"roant Faialsendrodt 0.42 $300.000 $a so so $0 sloam W&WO IlialsM 35% White Bear Avenue...Radatz to Sworkle ................................................... ........................ . ......................................... . . . . . ........ � ii�Bisdxo Bre, A -ora," "W, PCs Is, Base Bear A -no. 7.. AM 0.84 Nil Rocon., (State Add X, 0.99 ts.330,00) Idi'lWArel Seeded so so 41 51jaw 2009 Proposed Street Improvements Lorem IvrAlh co­ P- Emot MUSS 99_r" RRMF Ia as yams t Perm A's z i- c. I r•,. I. B..m. 4�­ ­arl ­Nace�­: : Average e.ef, set for Hdref"Od Se"t• $&: 5.958 — ,.is P­;;;; fl RWUjce • (State Aidl wMMMMMHMlEM= 4X38 UZMOO $1,498,200 U2,700 We stwelled"t To-krn kwtssmu" S $o $0 EsttnL-thrr A. St. Pool WAG Fores: St 4f F 7 r pv o R, rn - 4 S S3 ' A M, _ Or COO 4 'n 0­6 -C ---- v SO �3 1,15 s%OGAw ---- ---- - $4SSAfA $20D.000 $o 4X38 UZMOO $1,498,200 U2,700 We stwelled"t To-krn kwtssmu" S $o $0 Fores: St pv o R, rn -0 M, _ Or COO 4 'n 0­6 -C 8 OT �3 . Ol 04'� Raq gi R,COPW­t, Si 1 0 , G_� S5 S 3co 3M� 3 Dwro,-•T Awe --d 24 v-8 � 4 0 1 , q r � 2 PxI a -1 360 5 I H. s5r rX, S - , — '0 4 Cc r. r. mr A' ,e 1415 027 cd 2 �i MO c 2 SQ'QUI _q i 5 PC, $71 2M S S a- - - 35- W. si 060 C-0 0 0`3 2 X pw Or c­�. :�c S" 23 21? � 0 - ' M �­ 2 n�c $1 OW "Al"i f SEX Ol 5 - 2 ��De S' X, 5 14 8, 52 i 1p llu sia icu pa:'» Ct —C, sv-; S j 0 Ine d-'2 �v­ �ot Re�p ave�-­i S4&O 0` np S�o Dc' S�X �'�"Tl �2 1 ,1101 :: 45 �Or cyvab, S: 0 Sir' Average axiw PCI her Carsgow Meaftwa Aror Streets Roye n M2 Se70 1.30 Partial Rocoretm.ese 110 V.3$4,000 $o sz?.Saa $41,00 $6 $331.800 $431.000 $408,000 355. KoN ar A,e R 7 EY� - D 9, �,ll � 9 3 C� �7 r VCU 3 m a 5, SM - ­0 65P ji.t 5 i v:N) S2i 0 S Aln c 3 �,O a C -v 51 a, ,_ e S, ,4A .:,Err' a,_vro�­E 'D �7 si 0 nr s 4­ � �X 3 il w . S 3i� 5 83 C', S" rU 51 :f 3 S ",A VM n . r !4 `l 1t`" Zu Gem. St C Z' V 15.,w rr, sn r $ l., S �c­ v. L. �4 V­� 14 -16 �01. $ 07 GoNn A �A 1 S 6. Aw" -5 56 C, A, a.. S Sl on S- Averdet WeA PO f., CA Rd C Area Streed; Feqjwt: ul 9 ReverstrucL jLecalt 1.47 Ule• oa $0 $59,400 $o $197AGG $1151.000 VA711M Idell"d W% EdgerldmMoselawn Drainage Improvements 5 7111.711 .t0 $ 741 Kohiman Lane Axed Streets. Wetprmain & Sam a 1,,te Ca'.14 X r il to Sr, 5193 Ms) UMU RrEv EX vX 3HSO 14A C 23�, 1 -re3a.a.,w i Lr 0 Pa­vr .. z 14.00Q DOO vz Koll.Ma. Cr K� _0 �. �o 'j4 so SO $ .00Q 3- O'V V. 110 C.r �v so SLn SV .':1 V rcL K va'&nra a'�j &Ai 5, SrIc $aq A $ Areragseutr 4.618 tmt. (Local) OW $I 32a• $0 S347.600 MAN $W.000 $120,000 Mrrwo ............ S$7$•$00 2010 Proposed Street Improvements Total for all Projects in 2010 2t,as9 SsT FOP SlocIoOMM 42s4%DW4G $730.600.00 $234,600,00 $ $11ires00:0o S2,385,90)ao 21% Leogth Les" C.r.. Fundin Project - Streets MLIte. 9.1b? at imp 1YRR 'nes Mqfg 60emhi: Total C-1 at--ukAot sp-mothe AN FMF sR Ley Hollows North t P ut R q so—i— DA 20% y .H A 1, 0 ty — - ------ - --- A, ... q s2i Cor 4% els 212S 0.52 F.IJ st000rtruct tstate Ard) 0.52 m1socate 462ADO . ................................................ $ as000s' . .............. so . ...... . . . . . ................... $G ..... . . . . . . Mcn) ......................... 50 .............. . — S93,000 ---- - IPt Stamich Highlands 1 Ska- PI 4C0 n - KA �t-Ar.5V6= AA An si 0 $A" lu"C-r $I pzzv `II 'ke" '.j" AA n A- V a ? A40 $90-( -6 - A� -F Rulh G1 A Inn Z' nA F A n Ln L.I�a An, n2z & 0 1 - S -- NO P r Ce A- AAw �z t nK A, FO epllnv S S3 S s"O �nn F $2o .AA T� '.k -_ Wmg 2' FAII $1 A-� An I A n n PA.� c-'f S 4' 3-In n2� olin --ne-I S%'� wu 25 S 3 0 $2 AG� A r l � "9 rc A�O Ru!a S! 4,c 4,A 02 W51i2 -2 4 71 — — ----- D - - --- es�s S u C ', sljOr 3 r - - S22 2AC S 3U�� in �_O A -emam ever, PCI (a, Slanich tfighfands Profect 46.5 6,422 1.22 full Reco. & co"nwnt Roodoo 1 22 51 ;64Q" $0 102,800 $irrAnt 384,000 5IM4,200 $492,000 n Hills & Dales Area S re-t- I Ryin A- '52 :'3 32a I-, FW Re- I-n:oI i A-00 c z S42' ' s'n SA $6 "CO $12, " 000 .0 2 Are - *'4 'J:!7 . . 45 t: e,l FO Rs--zmuc' ki S' 68 2 St S A PA .0. 14,7 01; $4 r sir'O 5'29 51 5 Doe X". S,, rna r. A .te $ G.17. ­ FI . - 7 S219n 00� $A S. 800 MA A.1'3 5'2 530 S3 000 -0 Be om Lr I 3�1 n 2 FI, r--vtr- r aci q S. $c 'A� 3C -5- 0 -2 Or 3 SIZ I) CM 5 '704: '704: An. BjIre A�& 5� nl 6 3 7Ar -3 1 4 r " ru S2�` O`Ao $A $5 CQv U m-� ' 3n SM -3 K11A A $ 000 -0 DvI.m SI 0 rn Aa R. -Re- WNC� O�a-I 28 el �,In e- 1 �1`� I I Oci r 4 7 -2 $2 - 0 000 . on Dow, P 25 .!"'MOn) Sr =. eic. c2�7 S14 In ACA Zsc r� -A - $, An -C, I! A c,!.t '8&r C 26 1' A, qrzncn$�A;�! I� �Ac� "'C �AO sc� S 12 2 K 3CO $ 3 30C. 0 Sk t7 1 4 - 3 A ru�RCA.%V,, I �-Ac S "Un 00 so S� C"'K. S13 56� t23 �' -M VQ J--I- Gr Are A r Al pnn�gn �Lnai �A` K S2 �3 S3 EOC' $5 NO.! 4.44 AAA I' J-nrt�I A,e n A Ai Et... ,3i A S r,'- -C S4 4 i. . n SE� 55.6 00 12 .n rl"$ 0�,I A !ni re 71" On, $0 $ 1 S V. -L !3 Ark Ave n A C, 2 S ��v R'.,'nrt� A! 0 A"i $ ��O Ov � 00A SC S r-A a W . $ 1 AAA 0" r -n $-- ZA A re 0 14 - R�I 4�, z AcAI: $ ReA AVV A, S 34:: 8 $ 'Ar. t 7�n $42 00P 1_ Vv V S! nA co,'. CA S I en". tG wu% S6 S�� on Sa Kro 131, Is DuVrI S! A c4 a�E S2 06- S9 r0 S7n ',3ft Ace ',ro. 17 C'ont; C< 4A 4`� A CQ11 0A 50 Ic" st Jj: S3 Go' si 5 OCO 3 A A Average orior, P(d for Hit)$ seats Area PrIdec f: 50.3 16,272 los 3.08 $4.190.000 $117.5w $617,000 $214.000 $1ASI6O0 $1,254,00 Hazelwood Avenue, fr Haze I ' Ot S� ..... .............. ........ . . . . ............... C EG Arerate exhIr PC{ for Hazelwood � ctnrk are 4,64 0 0 ,96 --- Fos Roca-, posts AWl G.1% U AIGAMI . . . . . . ......... . . ... ......... ii . . . --------- ............ . iE ii — --------- 36.401 - ------ --------- id iiii. . .................... ii; Total for all Projects in 2010 2t,as9 SsT FOP SlocIoOMM 42s4%DW4G $730.600.00 $234,600,00 $ $11ires00:0o S2,385,90)ao 21% :2011 pmwed Street improvements Total for all Projects in 201 1 2011 21,124 6.52 &N SMURNO $"SURN SMAN NDAM 5499 ND 6492 NO 53 68600 52 31NO Md, Unk WMA Ca,C. funding S€7 M - Streets 02 Net ah- QM A"MA WOM BuThs Some Ad — -- - memo - -------------------------------------- WAC ISE ............................ Ammom Mo. ------- - -- - ------ Sinshe Snood 1 Mine Ra 0 a_:• .; O�� 77 S 2 - 'C v vow Am". -W Pro do Beene Foal Kai M 04 V00 &in 0.51 500,000 SCMIGO 17Q0M $18.900 $o $0 SIMS N KNAM Area Streets A Mn �, Am : s : 24 4N C M - -w R—mv I= v MO OM I A vmmo T MOM AMC p Vow NMI V"M mom np. I KolAton. AVF E"k"t-'Co S. - -a R a 02 D M M F 0 %--"d 4 -1 S1,.-.. Of I IS Sw No 80 $1 No $2 ?&C 5 No ELM SUNG S< =`. So No,- gn': St Lzx;, .eiC A. -Wppvu. AS I m ot- Fui Ac -v e.n a3 VAIND A moo S_ 1=.:. 5 1: 0 0 -0 So 'at US PSG No OCS% A.- aig S! A- -QQ 'WN A 43 Mo C N �o Fe RemeMod "n, S:7M= C m SON No n 846N ve ON 55 ON 02 MO SUZEN STSOM 34 5 0"CMS; C, Apm & -Qw Sr. 55 MO c 22 Fa Knimoomo T=Q v sum C A AM No 0 Vim S" as AT ON S19 Mo Smi No S1140M CLU KnNom Am Unkso" A -UW & 4 to m F0 ReW%Q0 � &W 7jo SO I m 2:. +V ON 0 Kim N2= VDNO VOCT SFUCC SUNG W- 7 CWAOMM Am" R >U Mr No 53 ..FU z 34 W Fd Mommod MW m1.. - FMCK ..j4 Am No 55 S No M?W WIND IN Mo Do &A T's MO v =. a swan S; !v-Cv-A--QWnV 63 :;'jr,. & M - Fo Ammon Mocor Vow= IN PA No 50 WSW 5MM5 M4 ON v F No SITMO v 02 NO 9 Gmen 0 A 95 1 " - Ful A" -MM AM* SLn"M to VWOOQ 0 5600 STWO SM No S16 On MtE"GOO NVOCC N U 10 mmm"ve xW"&WWx& 0 UK 127 W Fa %-Ww,1KW v num to UK am A moo SU= }war d' -2-�001 Sme Al Si4i A'� 1: Bewmam & Fmf=A--Qmm-4- N US C A m Fa Mem e. a -; S ti D no OL - 1290% ON 0 Him U53 .r1 No S' 5 no SIMMIC SOT ON 3CO A F"W me &--& & -"-. Si:.. a 43 1 m m Fa Anumm M=A V aCLSSIC 'D U. VINUM A ASK MKS 512000 p Mo N"m UOOM W`. x.,. A"mr Am Amm S; -Wm v— So IN 1 ON FO AmmUM I-P SIM"M I N Mumo 0 A NO MO =2 01 ON Sn am Allow SAMOM 3M A N;A Get rT A AS to 'D FA Acenona M=0 PKIMS C 10 SIN No 0 PAO Mac SIMM 0 am so Ma so MO U, US Sollwoo! A'�' Ca"�o- 'Uo-"-%,� S! 38 us 0 IS F0 AM ._I O-on k So 73"M 1m UK No 0 WSW TU MO so ON Vo No WANT Smcmv 300 3 AArnM Mw E-c-pm. 'V,- -4 : H, M4 5 U FA MWWW. �Lmn v VZODY I T FMCK 0 Umc in= MO DO mom MIND 55100C 30:4, Janomr ;3, -POV N A Mo mf pwwm PC! 9.-' Abe So Law-vW An � og= No NA - A -A pr"n! PC I 8-S Som-mm, L. mv :r... -mppNC No. A N V. AKiMe exist Ab to, Wesnor. H,A4.xpvr4Av,Arw ProjeoV 41,3 16,044 185 P.11 A— & Aworieid Rqdaee. 2.86 K940,000 $o $94.000 $141GM0 $MSM $253,000 $2,034,600 51,07.000 30% Coyn D ty Road _aMenAiht Rd, to Lydia , Cm. ww 0 W"gh Re -30 F Momv Ro a Mo 006 - PaRms' 5WAT a VOGOO Cos Maomu 51W ✓ Mo put 57 No K STOOD 0 $A =5 00" 2 cma Mo 0 no F WMW Q -W%MAW R vM 00 - FKA;x TmAW UNION "I v Mo ON SIN8 =2 So= so No so US Mo a VM00 '01, z Be , io ro. N ... �ue Lpd,. A- =�v PC C 0 22 bpRoovs; .QWAQ 0 1 C 22 x Ax, -17 AS 539.4 O 1% Avarote -Oot PCs far Stage Aid AMinoodruction: "I 0:,726 171 Fu1I R—., ient. Aid) 0,71 S2;840A100 SMAUSM SHAN SMAO $o $145,000 $o S289.000 10% Mvwd M id r, PC 32 71 1 - No W x %W n''. to I A Oman h HMO Sam sum mom Sm No $A IN AflE orr,,o,sh.00 [', -' 5 =3 2 5 N7 x q"=W%v So vo Got f M MUM 0 HMO MOO M so Ftm Sw Mo M730C 37-`:1 LOimml M SOU 0 - 0, 48 2AT 0 No pv. Amm%M M U=c :" "a No 0 SWOM 31 SM 05 ON U5 UK A& ON Soo Mo 30` %M11 Q W�mm 0 &M% So 02 my 1 N %'° . R--v%A S, 0: XI I SO 5340. {? $0 STNO 11 NO KIM vim SAG". No No Mt, Mov; S: C='A� —SM&O An t > 1 :: —5 1 Kaw ?= c v Soo No 53 A No $ US so am H. No SMS No S M4 MO ow MVI C! COW— 26 2N Fa A-= so B"N 0 N V N No: AS A-rege ­f,,t PU AD 0554 1 46 vomob 0 $37.400. $11118 $UMMO =00 31.044A00 sotwo 20% Total for all Projects in 201 1 2011 21,124 6.52 &N SMURNO $"SURN SMAN NDAM 5499 ND 6492 NO 53 68600 52 31NO Md, 2012 Proposed Street improvements Length. L.ngm Cvnv Prooct - Streets P CI ILAX - LM-1 Eeto MIR; �dub-? &I--ml I - M-IL-a TAtAlssal iw:;Tq §gr"IP%,qr WAq 3% 3% 5% 5% Castle Ave. Casto Ave Overe sea e Axl 30: 260 0.47 nn,,if klel- oencT S•,w 4, 54 r,n ee 4, 51,380,000 sgsssst, $M700 $59d00 sloosoa $100300 WCM $199X00 M% r,m1 'ne -�z. . -.6 12 - 52 A 14 FAee'. 5 e Doc S Oc X Man- St . r n P."n 452 n Ylei ��Jl r na Ku rr"N, Sa Me SA� DX 0 EX G. { Cai P<WW vv-�o $4-0 OU S 150'+ 50 SzMlpl, 5V KIC S2 K i 000 30 K. Kulls Av v 7, n X S 'll&i K , �lljc l 35 4135 075: 0,7s $l,d"Aao 0 $32.700 33U00 $woou $56,000 $619,300 $327, J§g1 gartel Area Streets &arc & 0— EP" 1c, 4M A CA n, z 1 7% qx C M sn�, nee $v4 5,� U�, ." e" el e �. �J� n-xt E.e.,Ei 1 220 SO �c C�Olu Sa Soo Sli S 000, $,2� SU'lle DOC r- " _ . . q E.X •yee Si 4.> n It en c�J: Rc"OnVnd Lner�� Kjn�OU K6,901 Sc WO Z,f S - Me S I - n 1 Don - ,n, "rn �v' 3' -40 so I r 2C.. $ 6 20 S27 sz Doc s3v 0 e3c FnEd W ( S. 'n c R—evluc, "n $ I D.01 • S 30e V 3C.0 s2r%cl Kc Me S269 7U X, T Sl , 2R C `.Z " ='.O oc� $0 Sv--Or ze z DOC Z 12:14%n 3 DOC 30' 37 WO 1103 1.03 . ....................... $1,870400 . . so $56.100 $55100 $95,000 $96,00 $1.062.900 S561,NG 100 $4,n 5- Dw % O'ec ""V% 79 5' C S N� S�O 2 $- �Or, n1n 2 00C vl e "n; 48 3647 &6g. 69 0,64 $1.240,000 $0 $37.200 W=0 $62,009 $62k" $709,800 $372,00 S sr K" --. Sl M S16 a,-: sa:• uor in v n A MV M C e) T-ak-;•i Ci "sn' &,e j� 1 3 oer.nit-- sn vx uvu X S�� ou -.q 04' %,,vav 0 2 i ReL,ei.-u t� 7- 8" r, $ t5 40n tv nr�: NO K V nn $54 26e 0 C� n. $2 1 VX ' 0 C*sz D ,cex � : ev, i r e C W S20 'N'r n e �p S i V �6 nee $ An 10 voa D I` yn� �i e6' SO ie sn�� VA 6U� S� en, VA S- 'ne% $R 004 H"Ic-d D en �Sun s n f� fl-� S �A Wk,;^Odd D Or een)se j.-" SO �A 2 $4 Zc', S - - $42 000 4 1; Hv eve n ��v ,n UnD �3- I n n� S 00, sl'� .-e �r 3100 n S� Jell. W 4 'ecnn6� e S -C K s," 3(Y:� Si i S, n� - ew 49 7428 1 Al 141 $1,830sco $o $54,900 454,900 S $94.000 Dig 100 Femda: 5! mn,-e', $1 n. S" :C3 c. X S O"ll �n 1-;i Aie n: 6 � Fn_-,e� -J e-- ' rn n� -"�n :n�, 0� I el nn $65 O"VI Ha�,*N'un,' A- _N Deep t 3 19 Y,ee n c­ e % $n Pun R n n,'� ................ e7 . .. . .................... . . . ......... S S 2 4 0" 1� $4 X3 e !,A�q' 2013 www" Street "prow.ts igsth 1MYth Wom� ------ ..... ..... Ildt� ............... � � ............ . .................... . . .............. ............................. Project - Streets PGA Feet MOOG Guru'? Typtotangsomramt Rate MOO ow owns ss-ay'AGOr WIC F.0 se — r 114 'its TMInn �Pamvieipk 3% 3% 5% 6% LEI �Mnyan A mmeMs . vMwa Am. MM. n --.0 Q Q C n Fes F. M Rus-ol"y TANOID 0 r ME No SO PI 40 M In ns $10 No WF No W`4 01 M. 2 NWaMaKe, Plawt QJ e M An PM W K�aw v *0=0 0 GO MAO No so SO xC to am UST& WE Do 541 ow No -M 30 3 (Twe R AMA", —wom—An M an 1 13 y- v SONG 00 van MG SO WAS! $400 $8 cc 58 IN HI am MUM 36 A Mvm R. K 05 a * As P.Mum"M v moms Do ON No so 14 WE 54 NO E No 67 No Of ON Sm No M­ 5 LMewmdDr R W* A­ vom�q An — no IM -3 M Amway vxomo Go ON me N SMIX Vk MUM WA we 1266wo SWING =.: e MerEy St RoAFy AM HOMM AM A sea GIB M Po Awnim r SON: am so ACT IN T4 13..;.. 55 MAIN MAIN) 06690 $W No A, ? AWAY A 05 h 0 Wq — Pow An H me OF n Fo Anownar S GONE OF WE m* SO SUN M me EsToc $ EI IS IS 2 4 0 T Soo I am, 0 "Mmn An — Ail 4 A We am , -0 Rmam"= $ 108 Soo ME so BASE Se No 36 No ZKOW MUM 50 Goo ZW Rpny NO Fts!"ess 5. CEO G1�9 ...y 1 0 Amway V sows V8,00 SWou POE ✓ 1105— md. 54 9216 1.75 WN $210,005 $o SIZNG MIND 513ANG IMION $1,887,846 $82LO00 30% 01jayMbry Are SWAY St P..A- K 758 0 as OWMAnen"M v nD ON C14 VROM GO $"an $5 NO 59 No 39 ME SM76M IN am w 2 &My M MAO& —00 Am a 710 Go as 1. "mmad V10003 GIG EEG ME 0 WIN Of ME UNG TO ME No AT 55"m W 2 sae.g ar­&—�aw Dr —Mum% 5 W2 00 Me Pno Amusna V 10010 012 vM Go W Ora.. SO I'm 58 Too 4 May S UFFAWS; —ksyo A No 05 ps AWW Rocadons v some D o vwmc $0 v No E.No so No 38 ME 591 M0 P8100 wh, 5 OEM at pmame —AssIaSi 46 1205 am As pas "mmum 5 MAN3 am IN so 0 334K 0.1J'4= AM so FAME OMAN SKNO O'Day Bit Foo,,J os - on! A- *3 ON as Ful WroMant v SONG ON am= so 52 MC So we MAO 5A No sum WHOM M O'Day I)7 Gi He Car wo Fun wwwas; v 840000 cc ST ME so So me 52 Me 55 ON SONG SOO WE 070M P Pom An am" So —OMM a AN to yes FA ROMMOV v BONO BE? VAIM So AMC SING SEES 3 No W3 1M P90M 30'. 5 Malin INTO: —Qx Am Go as go F& RaMMY v an so M no So COO w 45 030 MW IN $1120,000 so $39,600 $39.600 GOING 569,000 374I400 WOSAOO LEI) fgrellfFe-,dale Area Streets Manowev Am E. me 9 SMVP A W E no 1 25 Fe F A Roa" er? v so me am MAGM M so No VIFES WIGN =30M SM2 =0 SMOMM N 2 MhAm Fwas. IT Amuce An Is 1320 am :0 FoAsamm, v MOMS CIE ON No $5 V3 8M V380 523 No $O No 32... 2, SUENG W A Fmmam Am immle V GMT, An M 1320 C25 To FAW"sxcl v c »,, AD am vMW F Me No WAGE UU20 MUM SM22M WHON 32'x, 4 Famel IS Q­ 5,vod Or —Afoup'sI So As HIM am w Foaumomm" v So =I am MOD No W WIPM MIKE ME coo ME We 3399 ON W11000 A : , 5 peumoo; Si ME no — FA Remmsma v SO Ta". 48 8421 163 1.63 S&M%mo So SW S40I00 $151IN S 16 1, io ii.7141m SWING (68) DennisfMcCleflend Area Streets I SAMY M few Ew — Myoo a AT K' :° r FA % V No cc 00 S*KOO s: $5 no IS v: _.- VUX In` M) SAWN 2 ames 9 &"Y& —MQ A K Am so WN QW." v No cc ON 010000 K Him FACT SAMP ShATI memo SO ON M.: 2 Monza M ­ Ava Rd — Me, 1 r 55 1163 ON K Row Aw SAIMN ON on No v S25M $7W 371500 $2 523940 ME [TO 2O':: 4 Femme & Wn AN p! — want, 52 Ip am ­ WE xwo= v us ml 122 UK= K "200 V2 6M WIND 32 52001 1125000 a�`, 1 Dernm Ln M— AS- Rd NQV L" 55 "77 ON ­ PM. Reww" A MONOC so AGE no E SUM) sows K12N OF No SOO QD SQSNG = E Fon' 9 moo AN X, MW " K �F, 522 - WE ywv" M alwas on vQQq to SQ no S''30C UWA S2 CA WE W: 1122mo m" 1 MaPO Rd vMW Q— M Tow v 1003 "L n pa Aww" P AAMo F � K'n 3*1 no La- S� M :' 6767 L28 128 S2,4000110 $o VZON "LON 5122.096 $122,660 StUCON SnMWO LWx Mw Rd 65 5200 1.00 u p too $1,7NISO $1.287,300 SM.700 $53,700 500,000 506,400 M SAW= �5­1