Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-12-13 CDRB Packet AGENDA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Tuesday, December 13, 2011 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall 1830 County Road BEast 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes: a. November 22, 2011 5. Unfinished Business: 6. Design Review: a. Kennard East Professional Building, east of 3100 Kennard Street 7. Visitor Presentations: 8. Board Presentations: 9. Staff Presentations: 10. Adjourn MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD BEAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2011 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Ledvina called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Boardmember, Jawaid Ahmed Boardmember, Jason Lamers Chairperson, Matt Ledvina Boardmember, Ananth Shankar Vice Chairperson, Matt Wise Present Present Present Present Present Staff Present: Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Wise moved to approve the aQsnda as submitted. Boardmember Lamers seconded the motioh! Ayes - All The motion passed. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Boardmember Shankar rrfOYed to approVe the October 25, 2011, CDRB minutes as submitted. Boardmember Ahmed seconded the motion. Ayes - Chairperson Ledvina, Boardmembers Ahmed, & Shankar Abstention - Boardmember Wise The motion passed. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Building Addition for the Sl. Paul Hmong Alliance Church, 1770 McMenemy Street i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report on the building addition for the Sl. Paul Hmong Alliance Church at 1770 McMenemy Street and answered questions of the board. November 22, 2011 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 1 Chairperson Ledina advised the board and audience that the board would focus their review on design issues, not the proposed driveway connection to DeSoto Street which the planning commission addressed. The following people spoke regarding the building addition for the Sl. Paul Hmong Alliance Church, 1770 McMenemy Street: 1. Architect, Puneet Vedi, Vedi Associates, Inc. addressed the board. 2. President ofVedi Associates, Inc. P.S. Vedi, addressed the board. 3. Bob Zick, North Sl. Paul, addressed the board. 4. Kao Lee, Sl. Paul Hmong Alliance Church, Maplewood, addressed the board. Chairperson Ledvina moved to approve the plans date-stamped October 26. 2011. for the parkinq lot expansion. new drivewav and buildinq additions at the Sl. Paul Hmonq Alliance Church. 1770 McMenemv Streel. The properly owner shall meet the followinq conditions: (chanqes to the conditions are in bold and underlined.l 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a permit for this expansion. 2. Before getting a grading and building permit, thelilpplicant shall provide staff with: a. A revised site and landscape plan that shows the following: (1) The applicant shall submit a revised laqgscape plan that lists the plantings proposed in the basins. The plan shouldiiipe(\jfy thepumber, species, and size of plantings. (2) The applicant must submit a revised landscape plan showing the size of the replacement trees. This plan must comply with the requirements of the tree ordinance. (3) Location of the underground irrigation system as required by code. (4) A plan for the insla!!fltioqbf a six-foot-tall, solid wood screening fence on the south, west and east sidesqfthe site where the parking lot abuts residential properties. Staff will consider a reduction in the number of trees in lieu of the screening fence. The applicant shall consider chanqes to topoqraphv to desiqn screeninq usinq fencinq. veqetation and berminq. (5) Verification that all setback requirements would be met, specifically, providing a 100- foot building setback from the north property line. (6) Addinq landscape islands in the parkinq lot to break UP the parkinq lot expansion. b. Provide a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. The erosion control plan shall meet ordinance requirements and all the plans shall meet the requirements of the city engineer. c. A trash container enclosure plan. The trash enclosure must be compatible with the building and include a 100 percent opaque gate. 3. Resod the lawn that is disturbed by construction activities. November 22, 2011 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 2 4. Construct the required trash container enclosure. 5. Install a stop sign and speed bumps on the new driveway to DeSoto Street. 6. Before obtaining permits for grading and construction, the applicant shall provide staff with a check or an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of 125 percent of completing landscaping and site improvements. 7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 8. Comply with all requirements of the city's engineering report dated November 11, 2011, by Steve Kummer, staff engineer. 9. Comply with all requirements of the assistant fire chief and building official. 10. Requirinq the applicant to submit detailed buildinq elevation plans for review and approval bv the CDRB. The applicant shall indicate color schemes. buildinq materials and other architectural details. Seconded by Boardmember Shankar. Ayes - All This item will go to the city council on Dec;@mbef1j?, 2011. The final architectural drawings and site layout should be brought back to the~D~~Jofthe final approval. b. Bartelmy Street/Meyer Street Living Streets Proposal i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand introduced the item. ii. Engineer, Steve Love gave the report on the Bartelmy Street/Meyer Street Living Streets Proposal and answered questions of the board. iii. Ramsey County, Cliff Aichinger gave a report and answered questions of the board. Chairperson Ledvina asked if anyone wanted to address the board to come forward. 1. Bob Zick, North St. Paul, addressed the board. No action is needed for this item. c. Maplewood Town Center Sign Plan Revision, for 1845 County Road D i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the board. Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the plans date-stamped November 7. 2011. for the proposed Pizza Ranch siQns at Maplewood Town Center for the Pannekoeken Huis buildinQ, 1845 County Road D East. This approval is subiect to the followinq conditions: 1. This approval is only valid if the Pizza Ranch moves into this building. If they do not, the previously approved sign criteria for Maplewood Town Center will continue to apply. November 22, 2011 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 3 2. This action does not imply the approval of any building exterior renovations since architectural design was not intended to be part of this review. The city shall consider any proposed architectural renovations subject to the usual review process. 3. This approval does not include any pylon sign changes. Seconded by Boardmember Lamers. Ayes - All The motion passed. 7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Bob lick, North St. Paul addressed the board. 8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS None 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS a. Hold or Reschedule the December 27, the meeting Tuesday, December 13, , CDRBI\Il@eting. The CDRB decided to hold hour. The one item to be discussed will be b. CDRB representation at the Boardmember Lamers to McMenemy Street. 2011, City Council Meeting will be Paul Hmong Alliance Church, 1770 10. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Ledvina at 8:10 p.m. November 22, 2011 Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes 4 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: James Antonen, City Manager Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner Chuck Ahl, Assistant City Manager Design Review-Kennard East Professional Building Legacy Parkway, east of 3100 Kennard Street December 6,2011 TO: FROM: INTRODUCTION Request/Project Description MSP Commercial, is requesting approval of site and architectural plans for the proposed Kennard East Professional Building to be located east of the applicant's existing Kennard Professional Building, 3100 Kennard Street. The primary tenant in this building would be the VA (Veteran's Affairs) Community Based Outpatient Clinic. Refer to the applicant's narrative. The city recently approved a VA clinic proposed on the north side of Beam Avenue next to Maplewood Heights Park, Though it was thought Airlake Development, Inc, would be awarded the project for this clinic on Beam Avenue, it was instead awarded to MSP Commercial. PUD Compliance The proposed building meets with the intended use for this site as a professional office building or clinic as part of the Legacy Village PUD (planned unit development), BACKGROUND July 14, 2003: The city council approved the Legacy Village of Maplewood PUD. September 12, 2005: Staff approved a lot split creating this site. Prior to this lot split, the original property included the abutting lot to the west. September 27, 2005: The community design review board approved the plans for the Kennard Professional Building DISCUSSION Architectural Design The proposed building would be a one-storystruclure to be constructed as two parts. The westerly portion would have 14,000 square feet of building area and would house the VA Outpatient Clinic, The easterly 7,210 square feet would be used by a future tenant. The proposed building would be designed to match the adjacent Kennard Professional Bvildingin materials and colors. The propoSed materials are brick, rock-face concrete block and EIFS (exterior insulation finish system) on the upper portion. Refer to the building elevations and photos of the Kennard Professional Building, Staff feels the design and materials are attractive and, by its matching appearance to the Kennard Professional Building, it would create a uniform CampUS design. Mobile MRI Trailer The applicant is proposing a mobile MRI facility to be located in a trailer west of the proposed building, Mobile facililies like this have been used several times in Maplewocd at various locations. Staff has no objection to this facility as long as il is screened from the street. The applicant has proposed trees and other landscaping to the south of the mobile MRI facility, Staff would recommend addilionallandscaping west of the trailer as well for aesthetic reasons. Refer to the attached MRI trailer details. Parking and Access City code requires 107 parking spaces, The applicant is proposing to install 147 spaces, The parking spaces would be 9 'h feet by 18 feet in size and drive aisles would be 24 feet wide as stipulated by code. Driveway access would be shared with the existing Kennard Professional Building to the west as well as a proposed driveway connection to Legacy Parkway. Trash Storage Trash storage would be inside the building accessible from the east side, If trash would be stored outdoors, the applicant would need to provide an architecturally-compatible enclosure to store trash containers. Site Lighting The proposed light intensity should be revised so it does not exceed .4 footcandles at property lines. Landscaping The landscaping is attractive and would complement that installed at the adjacent Kennard Professional Building, The tree-replacement reqvirements would be met. These were established with the approval of the Legacy Village PUD in 2003, The 2 applicant would surpass the planting requirements of the ordinance that was in place when the PUD was approved. Landscaped areas like the seeded strip along the parking lot and the pond planting areas area to be left natural once the plants take hold, In-ground lawn irrigation does not seem necessary for these areas, but the applicant shovld make sure to water all areas by hoses and sprinklers until they growth has been established, Roof-Equipment Screening Any roof-top mechanical eqvipment must be screened if it is visible to neighboring residents, Signs The PUD conditions require that a sign plan be submitted to the CDRB for approval. The applicant will submit the sign plan for review at a later time. City Department Comments Enqineerinq Comments Refer to the attached Engineering Plan Review by Steve Kummer, staff engineer with the city, dated December 2, 2011. BuildinQ Official's Comments Dave Fisher, Maplewood's Building Official, gave the following comments: . The bvilding shall have a fire sprinkler system installed. . Comply with all building code requirements. Police Comments Lieutenant Richard Doblar reviewed this proposal and had the following comments: Construction site thefts and burglaries are a large business affecting many large construction projects throughout the Twin Cities metro area. The contractor/developer should be encouraged to plan and provide for site security during the construction process, On-site security, alarm systems, and any other appropriate security meaSureS, would be highly encouraged to deter and report theft and suspicious activity incidents in a timely manner. Fire Marshal Butch Gervais, assistant fire chief/fire marshal, reviewed the proposal and requires the following be provided: . Install a fire protection system according to state and local codes . Install a fire alarm system according to state and local codes 3 . Provide a 20-foct-wide fire department access road . Install a fire department key box RECOMMENDATION Approve the plans date-stamped November 22, 2011, for the proposed Kennard East Professional Building, Approval is based on the findings for approval required by ordinance and subject to the developer doing the following: 1, Repeat this review in two years if the applicant has not obtained a building permit by that time, After two years this review must be repeated. 2, Comply with the requirements in the Engineering Plan Review by Steve Kummer and those of the Assistant Fire Chief, Building Official and the recommendation by Lieutenant Doblar, 3. Submit a plan for staff approval for the screening of roof-top mechanical equipment if they would be visible from the vpper windows of the homes to the north. Screening, if needed, shall be installed by occupancy. 4, Before obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of 150 percent of the cost of completing landscaping and other site improvements, This irrevocable letter of credit shall include the following provisions: . The letter of credit must clearly indicate that it is an irrevocable letter of credit in the name of the City of Maplewood, payable on demand, to assure compliance with the terms of the developer's agreement. . The letter of credit must allow for partial withdrawals as needed to guarantee partial project payments covered under the terms of the letter of credit. . The letter of credit shall be for a one-year duration and must have a condition indicating automatic renewal, with notification to the city a minimum of 60 days prior to its expiration. 5, All landscaped areas shall have a lawn-irrigation system installed, except for those areas proposed to be left natural. The applicant must, however, make sure to use hoses and sprinklers until turf, plant and tree growth is established, 6, If ovtdoor trash storage is used in the future, the applicant shall provide a screening enclosure that is compatible in design with the building, 7, A comprehensive sign plan shall be submitted for approval by the community design review board, 8, All work shall follow the approved plans, Staff may apprOVe minor changes, 4 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 3,5 acres Existing Use: Vacant property SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Wyngate Town Homes and Heritage Square 2no Addition Town Homes South: Legacy Parkway and Maplewood Sculpture Garden East: Southerly end of the Ashley Furniture property West: Kennard Professional Building PLANNING Land Use Plan: C (commercial) Zoning: PUD APPLlCA TION DATE The city received the applicant's complete application on November 22, 2011. State statute requires that the city act on svch applications within 60 days of the city receiving a complete application. The deadline for review is January 21,2012. p:sec3lLegacy VillagelKennard East Professional Building Design Review 12 11 te Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan/Landscaping Plan 3. Mobile MRI trailer details 4. Applicant's Narrative dated November 22,2011 5. Engineering Plan Review dated December 2,2011 6. Photographs of the Kennard Professional Building (separate attachment) 7, Plans date-stamped November 22,2011 (separate attachment) 5 i:l-< < ~ z o >-i Eo-< < U o ,...j ~ , ,3_ ~ ~. ~ ;J;: 2 ~ c e-t'!J IJ ~i ~ dl ~ ~ ~ 8~<,il J fj: <,il [J ~ Cl Cl <>: o 0:: )0- I- Z ;;;> o () W I- <>: (!):;< ~~ $:1- ;;lMJa NM\11HLnOS w 0:: ;;;> I- 2' a:: ::> LL ,', w 0:: <C ::> OZtll tIlOW _:l!: 1-0 OJ: Cl <C Attachment 1 )0- w '" :::; ~ )0- 0:: ~ 00 :::i 1"--1 "'<>: <(:;< cwo WCl(j)~ "'O::tIl:;< O<(W- n.;Zu.Cl OZO:::! O::WO::;;;> n.>::n.00 -' <( Z o O(j)(!) a::",Z <CW- ZLLCl ZO:::! WO::::l >::0.00 '" I- Z (/)U)W Za:::l!: 001- tIl_O:: W<(Z<( J:UJWn. 1-"''''<( J.33~J.S ~ o o c C o '" '" '" '" '" '< '0 ;,j t:: n o ." .S] ~2'c E g.g 'B ~.~ .....'>0-0 "2 ~a o p..... g ~d3 , c ' '022 c:-t8 E ,S': 2 0 03 h ~ :::::..2 c ~"B:: 8 ~c <1.ot'l .;!:..ot; ~~"E >::.- 0 jl~ t- d;." U ~ ~ 8~~ ~ i;"E -000 i;;@ ~ :::l;.g u_... .o"':lJlti o c .-;;~ 2 Q ~ "2 ;jJ;2 ~~.~ .~ 52 >:: 0.:1 .~ :;: ;.. -g~.~ ~ '00 G]r: t;,$ '" u-' -o;jU_ ;...E~ 8'::00 P.<";lN E~ tJ "O.<E~ ~] ~ o ;.:J 0 iL\:lZ '-<o;j" >-,1/;:::I :::: ." 0 <1.;>-'."" [fEe:: -;:I '-J ;'l 8 g ]>-..~ "6.j ~ c:",,..J <n-;:l U ~.g~ ;3'.;;. . ~'_s;:: ~]~ .,.<1"00 ~g~ ---0 ~.i'L~ <-613 ....J ;> V 0 '" Z co ~ ;; o lJ u E " '" cI:) w:.; U ~ C ~ >11 ~:i,. ~jl!l . @"'!il. . ~J;q -JQ {!" 31 3~ ~ 11'1 ,; s!;~ it.~ ;~ ~~~~g il 'I e~U 'i~ ;i, ". . " . ~f~ Ii " ~; ~~.~~.~ :2 ~~ hi! i ,i18 ",'. ~l3 1;'Sc ~ ~.: ~~~ .7p~ i ~;l~i} ~gl!" it ",5~, '" ~2"1" ll';'~!~~~ gL H ,~j,~ ,,~[t\r ~~~D~I ~A13. I l--~\- ~ 1, ". a N -I I \1 H ., ,. I, l! I j m~ ;j' "'I'I'~I"P h '1"''''.'\I'II','l' tllltiitdt: " rllllll a' { ~ :Ii HI H] H H1 tl~ .~ hI H~ ,. , " , ~ ill i q# h ,J, ,? l !. ~ s.~ ~ t!pgK ~ ~ ~~" '~'I ~ ~ J a ~b ~"~.' ,&?_ ~~ ~ . i) t ~ _ e~ ;; 1 ~; ;~ h;~~ ~; .~ n ..3 ~~. .",~' 1 4 ~ ~: ~g t~ ~B" ~ '~.' j h ~; _~~t~. i .~ i i !t~ ~3 I;d s;: ~.. g ~~ ii~ :<.~~j ~; h ~ Ii ,,~ 4~5 l'n~~ ;j' w ~ j! R ~~. .~~ ~~i ~.~~~ ~. 3?~.~ t ~ i ~~id~~ iHI~. 1;; ~.~ ~i~ ~~ ~t'd ." ")" ", ~:"i ~k~ ;'~fJ~ :H fS-~J{! <L~" 'tt: g.~~ iZz "'\s ~o ::lH <:i ;)t , ~ t i . "- ~ 1 ! h ~ ~ n __ !} z ~ 2 ~.g Ki ~,;Il:I'~..,'" ~ '['I I " ~ ',~= ," II; " E~ I", t" 'i , " 6~ t ~ ; ~I ;~~ . ~ ~~. ~~.!~; ~ ~: ~f~: f~~ : ~~ ~ ~! ~s ~~; ;~; e: i 'e is <~6:tt.i 'd !~:; ~. ~,!,j ~~" ~ u,. " .~~ tl ~;R"lt z!~ ~ ~~ ~l ~;~ ~hf ~ ! ~ ;;: ~ni ill e;tt. )1 ~ ll~. "....---.- 13\.; ~ g ,.- i ,,~ :1; i;ll!m €~.~ ~u l;Ht ::~i '~"b 1hi~ ~g,i i~~ ;5i~~ "< ~~~ p~.r !~.~ ~~~ ~lct~ ;i = ~;! ( 'it1 ii! mill! <.~ ~~~ :~~~~ is I ~~~ i~ll!! ~~ 1. ~~~ i~~;~ i! ~~ h<ot ~~~C!l ?~ ~; ~~i !~~;~ i . ~ I H I i i ~ ~I eo! I , , .~ , ~ j i ! j i tj. ~ 8_ ~ ~ I 1 I ji [;1 Attachment 3 ...... ON No o Oe- , ~ "'", "'>", r-ro ~n. ~ "413 Si:t ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ " ;; c .. o " o o u S ~ o o , o ~ o W ]j '" " ~ c: o .., "' > j!) jjj j!) " <ii ... .c: 15 "" .. 'E. W o " " . UC . . " . n 15 o ~ W E l'l o .~ -0 o. 8~ 00 ~u f-. ,0 ~~ cst ~~ 'E.2 o ~ uO iv'5 no BE u' ~."'O . . 'd . '~-8 o .~ uu . ~ - 0 Uu o . . u o " .n TIe Eo.:. . . > - . ;on iij..... .~ g o~ <oW ",E ::,Q oiii ~E ~$ 00 e..,.. Q..!1 'l):E; ~ C - 0 . . ';;:z o ' i6~ E" ,2] 0- _ 0 ~ Vl ~ ~, u: "" ON N- 00 0'" , ~ "'<ll "'m ~ ro ~a. i:: ",1ft Slj ~~ 85~ ~ a: ~ ~ .l~ - . d ~ o E . " ;; c . " 0; c 8 s . [ 5 ~ ~ c . " :i- " ~ o -" .. € rn ~ . " ,; " . . , . ~ 1> c ~ m E . E ~i Q. I,) ~ .0 .c u f- . ~ ~ 'C~ . . ~ ,Q o C o ~ <ll:5 DO g€ ~ . :!1"O . . ~ . '<ii~ 8~ ,~ (5 ~~ f,j 8 . ' .~ "G e ~~ >. ,,~ ~g 8.iU "'E ~g - ~ Om -f?E . 0 g-:s ~.~ Ql,s ~ - - 0 . . ';;4:' o ' ;l] ~g s~ c C _0-. ![!'<I) ..ertl f- . c:: o ;; ~ <ll jjj " '0 en ;t: " ..J ~ '" ~ " ii: '<f"'t 9N N- 00 9'" <0~ 00(1) '<""-:'Ci) ;'?ro CL ? ^f/ ~ I l if ~ ...dB S~ ~~ fl~ ~ a: ~ i; ~ ~ o ~ z g: .;' >' ~: . Oi Ii; .' !;:;:, . 0' o .' .' .1 <I ~I " ;; 1" * . c o o E o . o ~ 5 ~ ~ c . " Ji. " ~ . " ,?, .. " . ~ " " 0; ,; o . , o D 1> c ~ . E . 1" ~'E 8~ .0 .cu 1'-. ;rn~ li3~ ~~ c.2 sa ~~ of:; .; "~ ~~ ~~. g,~ on !:': 0. nn lij 8 . , on '0 e :co. ~~ ,?,D ~g 8.~ "'E ~g "6~ l?E o 0 ~'C K:~ <1lf:; ~ ' - 0 . . ";;:;:: ~-g ~ g "n ~e ...,.0. !!! <J) n c: o .:p .. > Ql [jj z o F ~ wi ., 0' 5\ H x, i! i :J 1:: '1ij ~ (1) .r; ~ " i.i: Attachment 4 401 N, RljBERT SmEE1, SUITE 225 ~ Sr. PAUL, MN 55101 PHONE (6511287'8888' PACSIMIU (6511 287~8889 November 22, 20 II r~ IJ~ Tom Ekstrand Senior Planner City Hall 1830 County Road BEast Maplewood, MN 55109 I Ij RE: Kennard East Professional Building Dear Mr. Ekstrand: We are most pleased to submit herewith our project paCkage for a V A Community Based Outpatient Clinic ("VA") for appropriate approvals~ MSP Metro Development Company, LLC requests the City of Maplewood to consider approval of our site and building plans, MSP Metro Development Company, LLC ("MSP") has developed many medical/professional office buildings in and around the Twin Cities, including Maplewood. We developed the Kennard West Professional Building, located at 3100 Kennard street, in 2005 which is leased in full to HealthEast for various medical clinics. The Kennard East Professional Building will be our second first class medical/professional building in Maplewood. We purchased this site from the Hartford Group in 2006 with the intention of building a phase II or "sister building" to the Kennard West project. At the time we were in the process of leasing the balance of Kennard West and it wasn't until recently that HealthEast leasEld the entire building. Once leased, we were able to shift our efforts to the Kennard East site and Submitted a lease proposal to the V A late in the spring of 2011. We were awarded the project in October of 2011. The site is large enough to accommodate a 30.000 square foot building but considering the state of today's commercial real estate market, we decidEld that a 22,000 square foot building was the right fit. The V A will occupy 14,000 square feet and the balance of fhe building, 8,000 square feet, will be marketed for lease~ WWW.MSPCOMMERClAL.NfT REAL ESIAIEDr:'VELOPMENT PROPERlY MANACEMENl 401 N, ROBfRTSIREH, SUITE 225" $T. PAUL. MN 55101 PHoNE{651j 287-8888" FACSIM", (651) 287-8889 It was always intended that these two buildings would form a mini medical campus totaling approximately 70,000 square feet and that the buildings would share access points. design features and site amenities. Our plans implement all of these ideas. We hope that you will find this proposal an exciting addition to Maplewood. Please feel free to contact us with any questions_ Thank you for your time and attention. Sicce'~ Alex Young Vice President WWW.MSf'COMMERCiAl.NEl --......~.~--~.....-~~.-~.~~-....-~_..~~~--- ________M.._.._~___.._ _..___~M._._____.M.....____~~__._~~~__~_M_ ---~--,_._~_~M_.~~._~..___.._..____M_.____~_..___~_MM..__._____~ REAL ESlATE DEVELOPMENT" PRCWERry MANAGfi.l\ENT Attachment 5 En!:lineerinQ Plan Review PROJECT: PROJECT NO: COMMENTS BY: Kennard East Professional Building 11-27 Steve Kummer, P.E. - Staff Engineer DATE: 12-2-11 PLAN SET: CDRB Submittal/Preliminary Plans dated 11.22-11 REPORTS: Storm Water Computations dated 11-21-11 MSP Comrnerical is proposing a new medical/office use bvilding and parking lot located east of the existing Kennard Professional Building at 3100 Kennard Street. A 14,000 square foot VA outpatient clinic and 7,500 square feet of additional building space is proposed along with a new 147 -stall parking lot. The site was platted as part of the Legacy Village master plan development. Hence, utility services such as sanitary, water and storm drainage have been sized for the proposed future use of this site An existing 6-inch sanitary sewer line and 8-inch water line have been stubbed to the site and are adequate for the proposed use. A pond to the east of the site has been sized control to handle the future runoff potential from this site up to 76% impervious surface, The applicant is proposing 61 % imperviovs surface, which is well within the design capacity of the pond, The applicant is also proposing infiltration best management practices (BMP's) on the site Which meet the city's engineering requirements, Site aCcess is accomplished from two directions: Connections to the Kennard Professional Building parking lot and a new access point from Legacy Parkway west of the pond. Both the Kennard and Kennard East sites have mutual access easements recorded against the properties to permit free movement between both sites and use of both accesses. Request The applicant is requesting Community Design Review Board review, This does not constitute a final review of the plans, as the applicant will need to submit construction documents for final review prior to issuing building and grading permits, The scope of this review includes aspects of site design including, but not limited to, geometrics, paving, grading, utilities, temporary sediment and erosion control and permanent storm water management. The following are Engineering review comments on the design review, and act as conditionS prior to issuing demolition, grading, sewer, and building permits: SWPPP/Erosion and Sediment Control 13) Add the following verbage to the erosion control plan "Effective erosion and sediment controls shall be in place prior to any storm events, Failure to do So will result in deduction of grading and erosion control escrow funds deducted at the authOrization of the city inspector upon notice to the developer or contractor." 14) Stipvlate procedure for grading and preparation of the infiltration basins and trenches, Protect all infiltration practices from compaction. 15) Provide biolog along the west side ofthe site 16) Provide biolog reinforcement of silt fence along east side of site. 17) Provide orange safety fencing along all sides of the site. 18) Provide inlet protection for southern inlets along Legacy Parkway and existing parking lot inlet west of the site Geometrics and Site 19) Overlay easement lines on site plan. 20) Provide analysis on the stopping sight distance and sight-lines from the proposed driveway on Legacy Parkway in relation to the embankment and vegetation proposed along the sovthern line of the site. There are concerns regarding vegetation growth around the proposed driveway access from Legacy Parkway permitting adequate sight lines from the driveway entranCe looking west on Legacy Parkway 21) Applicant may want to reconsider placement of STMH #5 in the sidewalk. Utilities 22) Coordinate connection of water service with St. Paul Regional Water Services, 23) A permit and inspection is required for connection to the existing sanitary sewer service stub and storm sewer manhole. Contact Scott Schultz at (651) 249-2430, Landscapinq 24) All native seed mixtures and plant material shall be approved by the City staff open space coordinator, Contact Virginia Gaynor at (651) 249-2416, 25) Provide rock sump or rock infiltration trench to facilitate rain garden infiltration after construction is complete. Other 26) Applicant shall submit cash escrow or letter of credit amounting to 125% of the value of the proposed parking lot grading, infiltration, and final stabilization work. 27) The developer shall submit a copy of the MPCA's construction stormwater permit (SWPPP) to the city before the city will issue a grading permit for this project 28) The Owner Shall satisfy all requirements of all permitting agencies, 29)The Owner shall sign a maintenance agreement, prepared by the City, for all stormwater treatment devices (sumps, basins, ponds, etc.),