HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-10-25 CDRB Packet
AGENDA
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers - Maplewood City Hall
1830 County Road BEast
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes:
a. September 27, 2011
5. Unfinished Business:
6. Design Review:
a. Wendy's, 1975 County RoadD Eas.t
7. Visitor Presentations:
8. Board Presentations:
9. Staff Presentations:
10. Adjourn
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD BEAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27,2011
1. CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chairperson Wise called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Boardmember, Jawaid Ahmed
Boardmember, Jason Larners
Chairperson, Matt Ledvina
Boardmember, Ananth Shankar
Vice Chairperson, Matt Wise
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Staff P rese nt:
Tom Ekstrand, Senior Planner
3.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
,"'">,,,>
':ij;;"
,.;i
Boardmember Lamers movecl'to apo%ve the Auqust 23.2011. CDRBrninutes as submitted.
"::,:'. <i!iP'
Ayes - All
Boardmember Lamers seconded the
The motion passed.
4.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
>,
I'i;\
Boardrnember Shankar seconded''lhe motion.
Ayes - All
The motion passed.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Dearborn Meadow East, Building Elevation Revision, north of Castle Avenue.
i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the board.
ii. Applicant, Steve Boynton, Homebridge LLC, addressed and answered questions of the
board.
Boardmember Shankar moved to denv the applicant's proposal to add six shrubs behind the
proposed twin home as an alternative to applvinq rick to the back elevation. The applicant shall
revise the plans to extend the deck and deck rail to the window wells. The heiqht of the railinq
shall be at least 42 inches.
Seconded by Boardrnember Ahmed.
Ayes - All
September 27,2011
Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes
The motion passed.
This item goes to the city council on October 10, 2011.
6. DESIGN REVIEW
a. LaMettry Collision Auto Repair, 2923 Maplewood Drive.
i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the board.
ii. Owner of LaMettry Collision, Richard LaMettry addressed and answered questions of the
boa rd.
Boardmember Shankar moved to approe the plans date-stamped July 25. 2011. for the proposed
LaMettrv Collision buildinq north of 2923 Maplewood Drive: Approval is subiect to the applicant
doinq the followinq: (additions to the motion are underlined).
1. Repeating this plan review if construction has ,not started within two years.
2. Any new light poles that are installed shall matcb;;iRose on the site presently in place.
Ai';:>
(1}0":':':-
3. An in-ground landscaping irrigation systelTl1i~Rall be'ij1J*talled as required 'by code for all
landscaped areas. The proposed evergree~1itrE';!ilp to thl?,west may not be irrigated, but the
applicant shall assure the watering of:(hese fHlJj'!!rs for their survival.
<. _"",. 'i4~li"
, ,~-';;;:\.- ',"
4. The applicant shail not plow snoXY,,2r d'u);rp'~n'~winto the city's holding pond west of the site.
,;("--'J(!~l!::,
5.. The applicant shall sUbmit~,asf{es~iWoxy,,,~han irrevocable letter of credit before the issuance
of a grading permit to c()yerth~'ifo~l.of iNstalling all required landscaping. This escrow shall
be in the amount of 150'p<lrcenl':qJf the cost of all landscaping.
;:'" i(n
6. The metal fascia for the ca~i8p~iig~all be composite metal panel in lieu of vertical flat metal
panels with vertical joints with no less than 3 feeton center horizontal iojnt in the middle is not
required and it is noted the color of the panel is qravish blue rather than the intense shown in
the photoqraphs.
7. The pre-finished metal copinq on the top of the tip UP panels and wall pack Iiqhts shall match
the color of the tip UP panels.
Seconded by Boardmember Lamers.
Ayes - All
The motion passed.
7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None.
8. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
Boardmember Shankar discussed the last city council meeting with board members.
September 27,2011
Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes
2
9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
a. Gladstone Area Streetscape
i. Ginny Gaynor, introduced Todd Hallornan to speak regarding the Gladstone Area
Streetscape discussion and answered questions of the board.
ii. Todd Hallornan, Kimley Horn & Associates, addressed the board regarding the Gladstone
Area Streetscape.
Mindy McRanel, 1890 Adele Street, Maplewood was displeased with the fact that she was
unaware of the length of the bridge project and commented that she can't use the west side of
Frost Avenue and was unaware that this project would be so disruptive. She commented on the
plantings in the middle of the round-about. She was also concerned about lack of bump outs for
parking abilities.
b. . Resolution of Appreciation for Michael Mireau .
i. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand read the resolution for Michael Mireau.
Boardmember Shankar moved to approve the resolution of appreciation for Michael Mireau.
Seconded by Boardmember Lamers.
Ayes - All
The meeting was adjourned by Acting
p.m.
10. ADJOURNMENT
September 27, 2011
Community Design Review Board Meeting Minutes
3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
James Antonen, City Manager
Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
Wendy's - Design Review
1975 County Road D East
October 14, 2011
, INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Dan Opitz, of Four Crown Inc., is proposing to rebuild the Wendy's restaurant at 1975
County Road D East. The reconstruction of the Wendy's isa result of the roadway
projects on County Road D East and White Bear Avenue., The new building will be
3,329 square feet which is approximately a 1,000 square feet smaller than the old
building. The old Wendy's building has already been demolished.
The property is guided in the city's comprehensive plan as Commercial (C) and zoned
as Business Commercial (BC), which allows for drive-through restaurants.
, Requests
To build this development, the applicant is requesting that the city approve the design
plans.
BACKGROUND
February 1, 1979: The city council approved design plans for a Burger Chef restaurant.
The building was later converted to a bank in 1981 and then into a Wendy's in 1991.
May 11, 2009: the city council approved a right-of-way-plan resolution that adopted the
proposed right-of-way expansions and assured affected property owners that the street
widening projects would not cause properties to be in violation of city code.
DISCUSSION
Design Review
Curb Cuts/Drivewavs
The current site has two access points off of County Road D. ' However, the driveway
closest to White Bear Avenue has to be removed due to the road improvements. The
site will move forward with a single access driveway off of County Road D.
Sidewalks and Trails
As part of the roadway improvements there are sidewalks along County Road D East
and White Bear Avenue contained within the rights-of-way. This building project will
have no impacts on the adjacent sidewalks.
Site Lavout
The proposed building setbacks meet code. The building would be placed 45 feet from
County Road D, 108 feet from White Bear Avenue and 43 feet from the 1-694 right-of-
way line. These all exceed the required 30-foot minimum setback. The proposed
parking lot setback from the west lot line meets code at five feet. The parking lot
setbacks are less than the typical 15-foot minimum setback on the three street sides due
to the roadway widening that took place on County Road D and White Bear Avenue.
Section 44-14 of the city ordinance allows the reduction of setbacks when a street
widening has occurred. The ordinance provides this flexibility because the roadway
widening that reduced the size of the site occurred at no fault of the property owner. The
goal of the ordinance is to allow the city to work with a property owner so they can
redevelop their site without unduly penalizing them.
In laying out the site, it was important for the building to meet the required setbacks
since the building placement impacts the traffic flow and parking setbacks. In order to
provide safe traffic flow, convenient parking, drive-up service window access and a 20-
foot-wide fire lane around the building, reducing the parking lot setbacks was necessary
as is allowed by Section 44-14.
Along Interstate 694, County Road D East and White Bear Avenue the parking lot is
setback from the right-of-way lines anywhere from 1.43 feet to 6.2 feet. Normally, a 15-
foot setback is required but because of the roadway widening the proposed setbacks
meet code. It is important to note that the parking lot will be setback between 15-20 feet
from the curb of the actual County Road D East and White Bear Avenue roadways. The
exit ramp for Interstate 694 is more than 70 feet from the north Wendy's property line.
Parkino
, City code requires restaur",nts to have one parking space for each 50 square feet of floor
space devoted to patron use. Of the 3,329 square feet building, 1,668 square feet is
devoted to patron use. This means 34 spaces are required. The applicant proposes to
provide 40 parking spaces. The proposed parking spaces meet the city's dimension and
size requirements for a high turnover use.
Landscapina
The landscape plan shows the planting of honeysuckle bushes among boulders within
the two parking lot islands. Hostas and daylilies are to be planted near the southeast
corner of the site. The rest of the non-paved site will be irrigated and covered with turf
grass.
2
Liahtinq
City code requires the submittal of a lighting and photometrics plan which ensures all
freestanding lights maintain a height of 25 feet or less and that the maximum foot
candles of illumination at all property lines does not exceed .4-foot-candles. The
submitted photometrics plan shows the applicanl'exceeding the code requirement for
illumination. The applicant will be required to submit a revised plan to reflect city code
requirements. The plan should clearly mark light types, heights and locations.
Trash Handlina
The applicant has indicated all trash facilities will be located in the northeast corner of
the site. As required by city ordinance all trash facilities need to be located within an
enclosure. The applicant's trash enclosure structure should be approved by staff.
Buildinq Elevations
The applicant had indicated the proposed building elevations reflect the standards
Wendy's has in place for new restaurants. The exterior of the building will be
constructed with a brick veneer and stucco panels. Throughout the building there will be
,stucco columns with cultured stone bases. Staff finds the proposed buildings elevations
to be an attractive design.
It should be noted that the applicant's building elevations show proposed wall sign
locations. While signs are not part of this design approval and are reviewed under the
sign permit process, the applicant's plans exceed the number of wall signs allowed by
city ordinance. The applicant should work with staff to ensure compliance with the city's
sign ordinance.
OTHER COMMENTS
Building Department: David Fisher, building official, reviewed the development proposal
and has the following comments: 1) This building is required to have a fire sprinkler
system; 2) The city health office will require a plan review; 3) The plumbing is required to
be reviewed by the state Department of Health; 4) Required to go through normal
building permit review process.
Fire Department: Butch Gervais, fire marshal, reviewed the development proposal and
has the following comments: 1) Meet all current state and local fire codes, including
sprinkler system, alarm system and hood system.
Police Department: Lieutenant Richard Doblar had the following comments:
Construction site thefts and burglaries are a large business affecting many large
construction projects throughout the Twin Cities metro area. The contractor/developer
should be encouraged to plan and provide for site security during the construction
process. On"site security, alarm systems, and any other appropriate security measure
would be highly encouraged to deter and report theft and suspicious activity incidents in
a timely manner.
Engineering Department: Michael Thompson, city engineer, has reviewed this project
and has no major concerns or recommended" conditions of approval. Mr. Thompson,
3
along with Jerry Auge from Ramsey County, have been working closely with all affected
property owners throughout the roadway construction process.
Appeals
For reference purposes, the applicant, st,aff and city council may appeal the CDRB's
.decision. An appeal shall be presented within 15 days of the CDRB decision. If the
decision is appealed, staff will schedule a hearing with the city council.
, RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve the design plans date-stamped October 10, 2011 for the new Wendy's
restaurant building located at 1975 County Road D East. Approval is subject to
the applicant doing the following:
a. ' Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project.
b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant must submit to staff
for approval the following items:
1) Revised photometric plans
2) Submit plans for the trash enclosure structure, subject to staff
approval.
3) A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required
exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the
cost of the work. '
d. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
1) Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking
lot and driveways.
2) Install all required landscaping and underground irrigation.
3) Screen or paint the rooftop mechanical equipment to match the
building color.
4) Install all required outdoor lighting.
e. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy
if:
1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
2) The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the
City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The
4
owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior
improvements by June 1 if occupancy of the building is in the fall
or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if
occupancy is in the spring or summer. '
f. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
5
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size:
Existing Use:
1 .06 Acres
Wendy's restaurant
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North:
South:
East:
West:
Interstate 694
County Road D East and Arby's restaurant
White Bear Avenue and BP gas station
Taco Bell restaurant
PLANNING
Future Land Use
Zoning:
Commercial (C)
Business Commercial (BC)
Criteria for Approval
Design Review
Section 2-290 of the city code requires that the community design review board make
the following findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not
impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will
not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or
proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the
harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and,
the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a
desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is
aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors.
Application Date
The city received the complete application for the Wendy's restaurant on October 13,
2011. The initial 60-day review deadline is December 12, 2011. The city has yet to
extend the review an additional 60 days, as stated in Minnesota State Statute 15.99 and
can do so if needed to complete its review.
6
P:ICom-DevISec2NIWendys Rebuild_1 01 011 IWendys_CDRB_1 02511
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2, Land Use Map
3, Zoning Map
4, City Council approved Right-olWay Plan Resolution, May 9,2011
5. Site Plan
6. Lighting Pian
7. Landscape Plan
8, Building Elevations
9, Applicant's Plan Submission (Separate Attachement)
7
Wendy's CORB Project Review
Location Map and Aerial Photo
Wendy's CORB Project Review
Future Land Use Map
B - Business
Attachment 3
Wendy's CDRB Project Review
Zoning Map
BC - Business Commercial
PUD - Planned Unit Development
Attachment 4
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, wasduly called and held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 11th of May 2009, at
6:30 P.M.
The following members were present:
Diana Longrie, Mayor
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Council member
John Nephew, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Council member
6. Approvlll of ROW Concept, White Bear Avenue Improvements, Project 08-13
a. City Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the report
and answered questions of the council.
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Council member Hjelle moved to approve the rioht-of-wav plan for the White Bear Avenue
Improvements. Citv Proiect 08-13. throuah adoption of the resolution.
RESOLUTION 09-05-174
APPROVING RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN
WHEREAS, the consultant representing the City of Maplewood and Ramsey County has
prepared a Right-of-Way Plan for the White Bear Avenue Improvements, City Project 08-13, which
generally consists of White Bear Avenue from County Road D to Radatz Avenue, and County Road D
from Southlawn Drive to White Bear Avenue.
WHEREAS, Maplewood City Code 44-14 applies to this road widening project and states:
S 44-14
MAPLEWOOD CODE
S(..~. 44.14. Reductions in lot sizes thl'ough IItreet widening by condemning uuthm'.
itics; adjustmlmts to lot size l'cquircmcnts of chapter.
WheJ'ovcr the width of It sh'eat right.of.way is incnmsed b)' action of any governing
authority having the right ofcondmnnation and such increa!min the width ofthe street cuuses
the nbuttiog lots to 1m made smaller than the minimum Jotiii2e permitted in this chsptcr 01'
in Ult}' other ordinance, l'lIlt! 01' regulation of the city or whore such wic1eoing crmses the
set hack of buildings existing on the abutting property to be 1~IlS than the Bctback provil\ions set
forth in this chapter (II' nny other ordinance, rule or regulation of the cit)" ",lUch l'esuJtiJlg
reduction in lot size 01' setback distance shall not be consioer"d fl violati()n ofthis chapter m'
any-other ol'dinl1nco. rule or regulation of the eit,y nnd flhall in aU )'espccts he considered to be
in contormit)' WitJl thi!'l dltlpoor and with another ori!innnc.cs, rules and rngulatiolls, Such
decn.msed 8clhnck and such d~cr(!a!;(!d lot size is valid and conshjtent with the requireml!1lts of
t.his cl;aptcl', provided that, the lot size llud solb.u;ks of the structure Oil tho lot prior to tJle
street. widening were lawful and fill uses thereof which wore lawful priol' tn sueh chmlge in
al'ca or setback pertaining t1u!reto !ll\nll continue as pel'mittr.d uses t1Ull'eAfter Ill> if !>t1ch
reductions in- :mHl lint! !;ctback had not OCCUlTed, It is further fll'O\'idod that as to, aU
uniniPl'Ovcd lots or tnets orland abutting on that portion of any road, street 0)' highway which
is widcllCdso as to reduce the aVililnblc~ 8cthack distance. the minimum setback shall he th~
setback distanC<! required by thiB chapt:eJ' less the amount ofreduction caused b)' reason of the
street wid('ning, For the admini$trntion of this section, the "amount of reduction" !lhull be
co1'1sidel'e~ to be the numbel' affeet that the norma130-footsetbnck, l3.!oJlllbJished by tWB chapter
:md any other ordinance, rult:! or regulation, as it aff~cts improved lots has been shortened by
such RLfl~ct widening,
(Code. 1982, * 36,191
Attachment 4
WHEREAS, Ramsey County is the governing agency responsible for property acquisition for City
Project 08-13.
WHEREAS, permanent easements and/or right-of-way acquisition are needed from property
owners to successfully construct the project improvements and said easements and/or right-of-way
acquisition are required to increase the width of said streets:
WHEREAS, Right-of-Way Plan approval provides assurance to property owners that impact to
properties, as a dire,ct result of City Project 08-13, will not cause violations to City Code.
WHEREAS, Right-of-Way Plan shows the current right-of-way limits and proposed acquisition
thereby clearly delineating the impacts caused by City Project 08-13.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE.IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. ApprOVeS the Right-of Way Plan for City Project 08-13.
Seconded by Councilmember Nephew
The motion passed.
Ayes - All
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed Clerk bfthe City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular
meeting of the City of Maplewood, held on the 11th day of May 2009, with the original on file in my
office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the
Approval of ROW Concept, White Bear Avenue Improvements, ~roject 08-13.
WITNESS my hand this 26th day of May 2009.
~~
Karen Guilfoile - City
City of Maplewood, M
o
-
1<""lVIlll101lI~ltIIMIUlI.d.\ojtlllCl'l>)ItUWIJot
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
~ I
1
,.1
I"
11/
~J, 111
!tft ~~
I~'
I[ --z-
~111I1l
S I ,
Attachment 5
~'" II ~III II i!l~ ~ill I i I~II~II~I I
'I!I I li~ I ~ Ii ill! I I ~l~ilill !I
III dill I i 11111'1 Ii I~I'IIIIIII
liD ! ~.~ ~ l ..~ I ,.la"1 l~
$'>~ I f( ~. ~ l!i U
aV!!Vll
I;ll;i '
liilll
""1""1
. I
dl
i~i
d.
-l
+-WI-IlTe BI!ARAVE N
WENDY'S FOUR CROWN
1975 COUNTY ROAD D, MAPLEWOOD, MN
IlAADlIKlflAll
/;1
Ji!~
r "
. . ~ t I
l ~: I I
I II I
,,' 1'1
Ii I :'
" " ':
:1: ~'
II' I
1" I
" , I '
" ,
/1: I I
,.!" I '
" ,
"I I ,
II I .
'" I '
", I
II' I
1""'_.'''..,....".,.......- .11
hD...".........'.......IK.-
..................""'..-...
....-............
__ b...,.;''#''''-
"". ~" """".:...w.u.....
I ii'll
nn
~ II I
~ ; ~
j i
I
~
~
/F,.....+
r~
,
t....... ",to
:b)' b
,
,
~+.
;~
,
"
~,
,
L.+" .Jo+ ....+ ~+ .../ co"
~ ~ g b ~ ~
I .: . oj,+ .-+ CD+ ..J>.+ .....
e< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I,'; .'",\
~+i!::.~: t t ~+ '::c" f+' ~+
~+:J~: ~+ ~+ e+ ~+ :l;~+ .~~~ .~+
L+} (h+ :cYl .....+ t.'" ~::~+.' fJ)+ tj+
f>;~i /;? ~ ~ ~ :i,~-' C, ~.
k'-~+iP' Ql+ ~:.:,: ...+ ....+ t;j+ .Jo+
~~\ ~\". Co t ~ b .~ f
" ,
~\,.J ~ i J ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ J ~ J J.J
~ c ::r/Jl t;:c.. ~ ~ 10""4'" b OJ g ~ ~
:, \ \ J
~\ -\ \~!' .....+ l;.~+ .Jo+ ....+ ....+ ......+ ....+ rc: m+ ~+ ....+ Jo+ ....+ ;:;+
"t \ ~,I,. i: [; ~ t rg ~ b ~ b g ~ :!: iD
.->. \ , .. ~.'" \J \ :-. \
\ \ ~+_'l....~~-:j! :+ ...+ ".~+ ~ ....t. ..,4+' ...+ ...,t f'!+ '.t;o+ ~+ ~:t ....+ ....+
\~<.~'!-, """, f>> ~ ~ t', ~ \ ~ ",,:: ..., ~ ~ t: e;' ~ fu
)~'~~L~~<~'11~~, ft." ~+ x:::te~'~\:ft.;;~f~'''';::~+' .~_... t,'t. ".f!!t, ~+:_', e:- 2r~+ . '-';'B.~
/ // '..t\~""" '_~..... '~':~ ,_ _'.
>,/ '''<::':,'~ :s~. ~-~-~~'f~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~=.~~-[~~~Jt~~i~~~'.~~~~~~~t~._s:~~~~+ . ci:~~:-~::;~.=}~~~~~~~:i
", ::,~: '''' "<:::::: ''>.", 0::: ,~~~ ~ = __ _ _ _ : ::=~::.::=-:::~~: ~::~==== ~~::::::::~'"::-::-_:=-~=::.::=:: ::: :~:"""-"'"'-"' ~ ~:: ~ ~::: :~: ~:: = ~: =::~ ~~ ::::':.:::::
~==~,,~=:;J') ~
IO\IIlt\Il"II(lll~I"''''''''')''''''I'I~ll''WlI''''
"
"
"
'i
""\
.):
,
,
:
......i.
'i
,
,
,
]0+
,"'"
,
,
, ,
i~
,
::-"'+:
,..
,
'-.1,
"
~
~,
b
(f~+.
'"
~'
",'
'"
g:~
~
r:;'
~,
"
1;:'
..'
'"
~,
~
",'
b
It:
w'
'"
~'
...'
~
j
;:
...'
'"
-'
t:
",'
'"
..'
'"
..'
'"
...'
"
at
'"
..'
'"
j
:..
~,
'"
~+
I::'
1;:'
~'
w'
'"
1;:'
..'
b
1::'
w'
~
~.
'"
",'
to
r:;'
f'"
...
w'
'"
~,
~
!:t
1;:'
~.
!.
-'
'"
~,
'"
ro'
"
w'
~
ro'
~~
.;"
"
w'
'"
ro'
..
~.
w'
!.
....
b
...'
~
",'
'"
..'
'"
a,'
'"
~.
e.
~
!~: ~z_
~llllll
~ I..,
~.
'->
~'
..'
'"
f!},'
w'
~
",'
"'.
?::
f"
"
~.
~,
t':
-'
"
~
;;,+
~+
w'
"
1;:'
?:.'
....
'"
l
, -'
~
~.
f
r1
Ii
<;l
:..
~,
~
...'
'"
~'
-'
t:
:;.'
'"
...'
'"
..'
b
t;.'
~'
"
w'
'"
I
~'
~'
d
..
t:'
t'
..'
~
..+
"'..
g'
.~+
..
tf
....
'"
....
b
I
WENDY'S FOUR CROWN
1975 COUNT)' ROAD D, MAPUiWOOD, MN
~1'IIOJ()MEfAlCl'Wl
...
[;;
g:'
~,
'"
..'
'"
...'
"
",'
'"
",'
..
t,'
1;:'
f'"
...
~'
..'
b
",'
'"
~'
",'
'"
",'
b
::.
!;!'
.....+ t..i
w' "
'" !.
ij. ,j.
~--"l:l
'" ~
....+ tiJ"
I: b
~,
t
",'
~
m'
'"
1:"
~,
'"'
",'
'"
v:,'
~.
ii:
...'
to
-'
;:
....
'"
",'
..
",'
..
..'
..
po'
..
..'
~,
...'
..
",'
'"
~,
~
-'
I;:
~+ ?~+
,;'v.i,!
.~~;:i
"w+:' I
;:.
",+
;;:
..4~:
!g
,,' j
1.
C'
/,1"',
g
,:I ::
I ~'
j
j
H! ~
rl/..'I
:: ~If~i"
~. " 1 :.1 ! I
~"'d ;,
~4i
....+;. f+
1;',
,g f'
v:,' ,!i~:
;,.>~~ I:,..
~'
!I
!::
-'
l::
f"
..
~+
1::'
~.
, g:"
t>>~
,If.i
,D'
~,
j
"
'!'
",'
r
,~.
;r:;
';j'
'"
~.
:..
.
~
"I:
1;:'
~,
~
-'
!;:
'!),'
.....+ .
g;
e,+
....
..
ut
'"
f!},'
..'
b
",'
b
..'
~
po'
...
..'
to
",'
'"
w'
'"
..'
..
(;.
....
~
~.
...
r:;+
",'
b
,
~
t'
,
iD+
;0
, .
.~
'::1.'
b
~
'iiJ'
...
g'
-'
;;;
~~~~~-II
Attachment 6
I
I
i
.
~'
",'
'"
w'
b
1::'
~.
~.
ro'
..
~.
b
HI
~
.
ro'
..
ro'
"
~ i
H
H
. -----'--r-
lililin! I
~ ~~~~I~
laid
11'111
Il.VI......"ll(II1~IIJl~lltll.""'IIt'.I~JlMI~I.....
III,I,IIIII!,
'I II 111111
1111111 III If II
11111111 1,111' 1111
1'1 iii 1111
II'U
III1IIII1
11111111
Attachment 7
.... ~___u~.. ..~ u_...uw~_..,,_,_,...;..~.._..~_,_ .
,
I
I
, ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'. :.~.':.:.~ .~ ~ ~=~ .~':=~~~i~.~-:~:;-~ _:::::: ~~~; ~.~.~ :~.~:-;
i1 P r1 jil" pi I'l gI '" ~ "" t" t"
II III I~~ III II !i Will ii U i! ;11 I~ ~ 'I! I i~ I~ ~ [I ~ I~
III~I II 111111 1111 II II '11h ~ II ~ ~!!
~i ~ u as ~ r m~ I I I Ji ! I II III ~ ij
i II U !I~ i Iii i II ~I i A! Iq H II
~ S~ is i II ,II ~ ~ I~ ~ II.~ J I.
i Ii iq; 11'1' i II I! III III
i ~I II ~I ~ ~ I. II I II f
8 . d ~ imnnil!
.~"Il"~
FIIIIII
S I
II
WENDY'S FOUR Cf\OWN
197$ ~UN'lV ROAD D, MAPLEWOOO, MN
WI.lSOI.H!KMrI&PU.H
:=='''''''._-.-11
;m'J~~~-
__.....~a~
""""'" ,Ist-jo'"
..... 'UN' "'''''--------lilIl-.!
Attachment 8
-
~"
_..troI_'
I;
I II '11lD III 'II
! III I
III
ijl
II
"e. llsaJll.
:I!LeIIA'nON& ~
9 II I'MClA
.'