HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 07-25 City Council/Manager Workshop Packet*Times Listed Are Approximate
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:15 P.M. Monday, July 25, 2011
Council Chambers, City Hall
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
E. NEW BUSINESS (*5:15 PM)
1. Commission Applicant Interviews
a. Environmental & Natural Resources Commission
b. Community Design Review Board
c. Housing Redevelopment Authority
2. Police Space Needs Study Report
F. ADJOURNMENT
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Work Session Agenda Item E1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Sarah Burlingame, Senior Administrative Assistant
DATE: July 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Commission Applicant Interviews
a. Environmental & Natural Resources Commission
b. Community Design Review Board
c. Housing Redevelopment Authority
INTRODUCTION
The City Council will be conducting interviews of candidates for the Environmental & Natural
Resources Commission, Community Design Review Board, and the Housing Redevelopment
Authority. There are a total of three (3) openings, one on each commission/board. Each of
these vacancies are due to a resignation, therefore the individual assigned to that position will
serve the remainder of that term.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council interview the candidates as indicated in the schedule below.
The suggested questions will be submitted under separate cover to the Council. During the
interview process, Council Members should fill out their ballots. Once the Interviews have
concluded, Council Members should submit their ballots to staff, which will be tallied with the
results brought back to the Council during the regular meeting for appointment, if possible.
The schedule is as follows:
Time
Name
5:15 PM
Question Selection
Environmental & Natural Resources (1 opening)
5:25 PM
Ann Palzer
5:40 PM
Gary Kloncz
Community Design Review Board (1 opening)
5:55 PM
Jawaid Ahmed
Housing Redevelopment Authority (1 opening)
6:10 PM
Dennis Unger
Attachments:
1. Candidate Applications in order of interview schedule
Packet Page Number 1 of 19
Packet Page Number 2 of 19
Packet Page Number 3 of 19
Packet Page Number 4 of 19
Packet Page Number 5 of 19
Packet Page Number 6 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager
Dave Thomalla, Police Chief
SUBJECT: Review Preliminary Findings of Police Department Space Needs Report
DATE: July 19, 2011
INTRODUCTION
The City Council has authorized preparation of a study of space needs within the Police
Department. The architect performing the study, Larry Koch, of SEH, Inc. will be providing a
summary of the findings and options for expanding the Police Department. Mr. Koch’s
presentation will include the following topics:
1. Review of New Building Costs
2. Review of Four Options for Expansion at Existing City Hall
3. Questions / Discussion
The SEH representatives have spent a significant amount of time reviewing Police operations
and conducted a survey of personnel regarding the various needs of the various Police
functions. Attached are three options that will be reviewed and the related ways that the
buildings meet the overall department needs. A fourth option is still being developed that will
use more of existing City Hall, but further impact current operations in Citizen Services and Park
and Recreation, while requiring a full relocation of the Community Development staff. This
fourth option may be the least costly of the proposals.
Also attached is rough estimate of the cost of the various options. The options are not
exclusively comparable, as noted below:
New Building; $10.7 - $12.2 million*
• - Does not include +$3 million for site acquisition,utilities,site development costs
Option #1: $ 4.4 - $5.2 million [provides for 18 car indoor parking]
Option #2: $ 5.8 - $7.3 million [provides for 25 car indoor parking]
Option #3: $ 7.3 - $9.3 million [provides for 40-car indoor parking]
Option #4: -still being evaluated
The intent of the work session is to review options. As noted, the most expensive area, because
of the overall space needed is the indoor parking area. Chief Thomalla will report that the
highest priority to address in space needs is locker room space as priority #1a and office space
as priority #1b. The addition of the parking, while very important adds nearly $3.0 million to the
overall project, and also provides for the ability to add a shooting range. Certainly, those
additions are part of the best long-term plan, and should be included in building planning, but as
we move through this discussion, may be part of a phasing plan.
Option #4, as a fall-back plan, would reduce costs and provide the ability to make improvements
in a phased approach. As noted in each of the options, areas of expansion are in general “pods”
or expansion areas. Each of those could be phases as we move into funding discussions.
Packet Page Number 7 of 19
POLICE SPACE NEEDS STUDY
PAGE TWO
Funding Discussion
As we continue our evaluation of the Council’s goal to look at facility needs, this type of expense
and improvement will need to be incorporated into the long-range planning. While not
specifically shown in the Capital Improvement Plan, we have considered that a $3.0 - $4.0
million expenditure may occur in 2012 to 2014 to help address these needs. However, we would
need to set aside about $250,000 to $350,000 annually for 15 years to pay that type of debt.
The larger discussion will need to center around a possible referendum for the police station.
When should that be done, if selected? And, how much of a referendum should be requested?
The intent of this work session is to review the options and for the Council to begin to provide
guidance on the direction of the expansion efforts. Do we continue to explore the full/best
expansion and consideration of a referendum? Or should we look at smaller scale
improvements that might be available in our Option #4 that minimize expenses with use of
existing space, but require more departmental relocations, and could possibly be financed with
CIP Bonds that would not require a referendum?
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council discuss the issues of the Police Department space
needs and provide some input and guidance as to the direction for further analysis for either a
new Police Department Building or proceeding with an addition/re-modeling.
Attachments:
1. Option #1
2. Option #2
3. Option #2 – second level
4. Option #3
5. Probable Opinion of Cost
Packet Page Number 8 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 1Packet Page Number 9 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 2Packet Page Number 10 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 3Packet Page Number 11 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 4Packet Page Number 12 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 13 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 14 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 15 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 16 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 17 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 18 of 19
Work Session Agenda Item E2 Attachment 5Packet Page Number 19 of 19